Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lexi Grubbs
Ms. Burke
26 January 2017
English 11: Honors American Literature
The Spokesperson of The Civil Rights Movement: Malcolm X or Martin Luther King?
The civil rights movement that occurred in the 1960s can be considered to be one of the
most influential social justice topics in the United States of America. In this time frame, two civil
rigts activists brought to light their own unique opinions on the issue: Malcolm X and Dr. Martin
Luther King. While King and X both held strong, influential viewpoints on the issue of black
civil rights, X offers more worldly, personable opinions on the topics at hand that show the
fierce, resilient mindset of the African American demonstrators. Evidence in this can be found
through his (Malcolm X) opinion pertaining to the concepts of self-defense and acceptance
Malcolm X expressed a toleration for self-defense that Dr. King did not agree with. X
states in his speech, The Ballot or the Bullet, that violence should be mutual when in
commission. Im nonviolent with those who are nonviolent with me. But when you drop that
violence on me, then youve made me go insane, and Im not responsible for what I do. This
quote describes how X avoided hostility until the aggression was imposed upon him by
somebody else; King claimed in speech, Nonviolence: The Only Road to Freedom, that
the mere protection of ones home and person against assault by lawless night riders does not
provide any positive approach to fears and conditions that provide violence... He means that
under no circumstance is violence acceptable, even in a rally for civil rights and equality. X holds
a more acceptable approach in this scenario because he believes violence should not be
Grubbs 2
encouraged, but it is a notion that can be used if need be. As stated in Kings speech, many
African Americans did not join the movement because of the feared consequence that would be
faced if they used defense. Additionally, Dr. King stated the following about the direction that
violence is leading people, It was the talk of fearful men, saying that they would not join the
nonviolent movement because they would not remain nonviolent if attacked. Now the climate
had shifted so that it was even more popular to talk of violence, but in spite of the talk of
violence there emerged no action in this direction. In this quote, Dr. King claims that men are
not even using the violence for which they advocate in a way that guides them towards freedom.
In laymens terms, the advocates that promote forceful tactics use it as their first method of
defense rather than using their words. While, yes, words allow a more peaceful way to handle
situations, actions show the true colors of humans. A man can sound one way but act another.
That being said, Malcom X holds a point that stands truer: be the man that you truly are in order
In addition to the mens arguments on self-defense, Dr. Martin Luther King and Malcolm
X further hold opinions on the character of their fellow man, particularly the white men of the
time. There are certain instances throughout Kings speech where he directly generalizes men
based on some aspects of their life. In one section of his speech, for example, King is speaking
about riots that occurred in the south. He says the following about how they were put to an end,
So far, only the police through their fears and prejudice have goaded our people to riot. []This
demonstrates that these violent eruptions are unplanned, uncontrollable, temper tantrums brought
constantly faced with biased and prejudice for something so trivial as the color of his skin, is it
fair to make an assumption, a cruel at that, about men because of their skin color, job, or area in
Grubbs 3
which they live? Why stoop down to the level of your enemy? This is only a single example of
Kings categorizing found in this speech among others. Yes, this is not uncommon for the people
of the world to do, but in some instance, especially one like this, there is no room for making
upsetting, broad judgments. Malcolm X goes so far as to point out that this is not a war on the
actions of the white man, but simply a war on the oppression of man, stating, It doesn't mean
that we're anti-white, but it does mean we're anti-exploitation, we're anti-degradation, we're anti-
oppression. And if the white man doesn't want us to be anti-him, let him stop oppressing and
exploiting and degrading us. Whether we are Christians or Muslims or nationalists or agnostics
or atheists, we must first learn to forget our differences. X communicates that the African
Americans are not limited to this abuse, but so are those of different religions, ethnicities,
citizenships, and so much more; there could very well be a white man being degraded in one of
the groups mentioned! In his statement, X explicitly tells the audience of the fact that the people
following him are not anti-white in away, rather they are against acts that repress any form of
human rights. There is no crude generalizations in this statement; there are no negative messages
in his message. Also, there is no confinement to forms of oppression in the country, being that he
states that he is against more than the one mentioned prior. With all of that, X proves further
proves that his assessment is more acceptable, fierce, and dynamic than that of Martin Luther
King.
Though the war on segregation was a success, there are still many injustices present
inside of the United States that have not been solved. In the past year, two movements have come
about in the United States that have changed the dynamic of equality: Black Lives Matter and
Blue Lives Matter. In each, a specific side, either Police officers or the African Americans of the
country, is being treated unfairly. They are being killed, assaulted unlawfully, and protested
Grubbs 4
against. Also, in another example that has just occurred, women have begun protesting in the
capital in order to ensure that their rights will remain intact with the new president. They are
afraid that all of the rights that they hold, such as the right to have an abortion, are going to be
forcefully stripped from them. It is true, oppression is still an issue. The crude generalization
made about each party mentioned only assists in adding to frustrations to the battles. This is a
prime example of how Malcom Xs outlook could be used to calm the annoyance of the people
Through his opinion on the issues pertaining of self-defense and acceptance amongst
minorities throughout the nation, Malcolm X provided a more relatable viewpoint that shows his
looking out for both racial and religious oppression alike. He used a more human approach to
convey his message to the public. He lacked the crude generalizations that Martin Luther King
included in his speech. For those reasons, it shows that X offers more worldly, personable
opinions on the topics at hand that show the fierce, resilient mindset of the African American