Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By:
RAJARAM JOSHI
Shanker Dev Campus
Campus Roll No.: 1204/063
T.U. Regd. No.: 7-2-31-535-2003
Second Year Exam Roll No.: 2486
Kathmandu, Nepal
September 2013
RECOMMENDATION
This is to certify that the thesis
Submitted by:
Rajaram Joshi
Entitled:
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT OF
COMMERCIAL BANKS IN NEPAL
(With Special Reference to NIBL, HBL, EBL & NABIL)
by:
Rajaram Joshi
Entitled:
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT OF
COMMERCIAL BANKS IN NEPAL
(With Special Reference to NIBL, HBL, EBL & NABIL)
And found the thesis to be the original work of the student and written
According to the prescribed format. We recommend the thesis to be
accepted as partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of
Master of Business Studies (MBS)
Viva-Voce Committee
I hereby declare that the work reported in this thesis entitled Working
Capital Management of Commercial Banks in Nepal (With Special
Reference to NIBL, HBL, EBL & NABIL)" submitted to Office of the Dean,
Faculty of Management, Tribhuvan University, is my original work done in the
form of partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of
Business Studies (MBS) under the supervision of Joginder Goet of Shanker
Dev Campus, T.U.
..
Rajaram Joshi
Shanker Dev Campus
Campus Roll No.: 1204/063
T.U. Regd. No.: 7-2-31-535-2003
Second Year Exam Roll No.:2486
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This thesis has been prepared to fulfill the partial requirements for the degree
of Masters of Business Studies (MBS) of Tribhuwan University. For this, I
would like to acknowledge the effort of Office of the Dean, Faculty of
Management, T.U., for offering such a great course in our syllables to enhance
the quality of management education in the country.
This product of research, definitely is my original work, would not have taken
this shape without sincere help and continuous encouragement from different
respectable persons. I feel my duty to remember and express my heartfelt
acknowledgement to those all.
First, I would like to extend my cordial thanks and deep gratitude towards my
reverent supervisor Joginder Goet for his kind guidance & encouragement
throughout the research work. I am grateful to Saroj Joshi, Niranjan Sigdel &
Lekhnath Paudel very good friend of mine. I would like to express my sincere
thanks to the staff of library of and administration of Shanker Dev Campus
whose kind cooperation has made it possible to complete the work.
I also cannot forget the co-operation behavior of the staffs of concerned banks
for their great support in providing the data.
Finally I would like to thank to my all family members who always encouraged
and inspired me to prepare this research work, especially to my wife Bunu
Timsina Joshi for her great support and help to prepare this thesis.
Rajaram Joshi
ABBREVIATIONS
Talking about the history of bank, an institutional banking system came into
existence in Nepal only in the 19th century. Nepal Bank Limited was the first
financial institutional of Nepal established on the 30th of Kartik 1994. Being a
commercial bank, it focuses on income generating and profit maximization. As
it was only one commercial bank, it has to look the economic condition of
country. Only one Nepal Bank Limited was not sufficient to look all the sector
of country. So in 2013 B.S. another bank named Nepal Rastra Bank was
established as the central bank. Similarly the 2nd commercial bank Rastriya
Banijya Bank was established as the second commercial bank of Nepal in
Magh 10, 2022 B.S., under Rastriya Banijya Bank Act 2021. This act is now
revised as Commercial Bank Act 2031. B.S. Accepting deposits, granting loan
and performing commercial banking functions are the main motto of
commercial bank (Commercial Bank Act, 2031). For the development of
industry, commerce and trade, Nepal Industrial Development Corporation was
established under Industrial Development Corporation Act 2016. For the
development of agricultural section, Agricultural Development Bank was
established on Magh 7th 2024 B.S., under the Agricultural Bank Act 2024 B.S.
The government of Nepal observed the necessities of rapid development of the
country for which it has adopted liberalized economic policy, laissez fair
economy and encouraged foreign investment. The government formed
Foreign Investment & Technology Act 1981 A.D. which was later revised as
Act 1992 A.D. by new elected democratic government(Foreign Investment
and Technology Act, 1992). The joint venture bank was introduced in Nepal in
2041 B.S. with the establishment of Nepal Arab Bank Limited. It was
established with joint venture of U.A.E bank, financial institution of Nepal.
The second joint venture bank, Nepal Indosuez Bank Limited was established
in 6th Magh 2042 B.S. Similarly, others joint venture banks like, Nepal
Grindlays Bank Limited on 16th Marg 2043, Himalayan Bank Limited on 2049
B.S., Nepal State Bank of India Limited on 2050 B.S., Nepal Bangladesh Bank
Limited on 2051 B.S., Everest Bank Limited on 2051 B.S., Bank of
Kathmandu on 2052 B.S. and Nepal Bank of Celon Limited on 2052 B.S. have
been established. Till now other commercial banks have been also established.
Among them majority of banks are established in joint venture banks. A joint
venture is the joining of forces between two or more enterprises for the purpose
of carrying out a specific operation industrial or commercial investment,
production or trade (Gupta, 1984: 15).
Joint venture banks play an important role for economic development of nation.
They have been adopted new banking technique, management like
hypothecation, syndication lending policies, tale banking credit card, master
card from international banking technique. They render various services to
their customers in order to facilitate their economic and social life. Joint
venture banks are operating in Nepal in an act as commercial banks are
operating and performing their work under the direction and supervision of
Nepal Rastra Bank. Nowadays, there are many joint venture banks and other
financial institutions, but there are little opportunities to make fair investment.
Meanwhile, the banks and financial institutions are offering competitive
deposit and credit interest rate. So to survive in the spirited banking market,
one should follow the fundamental principles of sound investment policy with
minimum risk and maximum profit.
At present, about a dozen of the commercial banks are operating in Nepal and
are playing important role in the economic development of the country.
The name of the Bank has been changed to Nepal Investment Bank Limited
upon approval of Banks Annual General Meeting (AGM), Nepal Rastra Bank
and Company Registrars office with the following shareholding structure.
The sample banks viz. Nepal Investment Bank Limited (NIBL), Himalayan
Bank Limited (HBL), Everest Bank Limited (EBL) and NABIL Bank Limited
(NABIL) seen well in comparison to other Commercial banks on the account of
their performance and profitability as well. It is the question of the study that
whether there is any relationship of working capital management with regard to
their performance and profitability among these banks.
So, following are the major problems that have been identified for the purpose
of this study.
What is the banks image in relation to working capital?
What are the major factors affecting the management of working capital
of NIBL, HBL, EBL and NABIL?
Which of the current assets are more problematic in NIBL, HBL, EBL
and NABIL?
What is the lending pattern of loan and advance and other investment?
What are the components of working capital, which affect the operating
income of NIBL, HBL, EBL and NABIL?
threatens the solvency of enterprise as well as affects its growth. On the other
situation, banks have to adopt suitable strategies for their existence. They
management is the crux of problem to prepare the proper strategy on its favors.
So the study might be helpful for the management of the concerned bank as
well as it might be valuable for the researcher, scholars, student who wants to
CHAPTER - II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Review of Literature means reviewing research studies or other related
Proposition in related area of the study so that all the past studies, their
conclusions and deficiencies may be known and further research can be
conducted. Under this section of the study the conceptual review related to the
working capital management, the review of Journals and articles and the review
of the thesis have been presented.
Working Capital refers to the resources of the firm that are used to conduct
day-to-day operation that makes business successful. In simple words working
capital is the excess of current Assets over current liabilities. Working capital
has ordinarily been defined as the excess of current assets over current
liabilities. Without cash, bills cannot be paid, without receivable the firm
cannot allow timing different between delivering goods to services and
collecting the money to pay for them, without inventories the firm cannot
engage in production nor can it stock goods to provide immediate deliveries.
As a result of the critical nature of current assets the management of working
capital is one of the most important areas in determining whether a firm will be
successful. Need of working capital is directly related to firms growth. The
term working capital refers to the current assets of the firms those items that
can be converted into cash with in the year. Net working capital is defined as
the difference between current assets and current liabilities (Hamption and
Wagner, 1989: 34).
Every business needs capital for two purposes. The first requires for long term
purpose which is called Fixed Capital. Such funds are required to create
production facility. Investment in plants, machinery, land, building etc. comes
under production activity. Investment in these assets represents that part of
firms capital which is block on a permanent or fixed basis. Such assets are not
purchased with the objective of resale.
To operate business, a firm also needs another type of capital which is known
as Short Term Capital or Working Capital. The funds required for purchased of
raw material, payment of wages and another day to day expenses etc. is called
as Working Capital. Similarly, the investment required for work-in-progress,
raw material, finished goods, sundry debtors, bills receivable etc. also comes
under working capital. The investment for the working capital may be
transferred into cash within a short period, generally a year. So it is also called
Circulating Capital or Revolving Capital or Floating Capital. Generally, the
capital required for running day-to-day operation of a business is called
Working Capital. It is concerned with current assets and current liabilities.
Asset of an essentially short term nature is known as Current Assets. It is a
short term investment. Current assets are expected to be converted into cash
within a short period. Those assets which are either readily available cash or
are convertible into cash within a short time relatively during the normal course
of business are known as Current Assets. The examples of current assets are
cash in hand, cash at bank, bills receivable, sundry debtors inventory,
prepayments, loans and advances etc. Current liability is another part
concerned with working capital. Those liabilities which are expected to have
been paid within a short period are known as Current Liabilities. The examples
of current liabilities are bank overdraft, sundry creditors, bills payables,
outstanding expenses, received in advance cash credit etc.
The word working means work at present. So, working capital is capital
working at present. Technically, working capital management is an integral
part of overall financial management (Khan and Jain; 1999:15.2). It represents
that part of fund that circulates from one form of current assets to another form
in ordinary course of business. For example, cash is used to purchase raw
material which creates stock of finished goods which, in turn, is sold for cash.
Therefore, working capital management is concerned with problems that arise
within attempting to manage the current assets, current liabilities and the
interrelationship that exists between them (Kulkarni, 1990:374).
II. Goodwill
A firm with sufficient working capital can provide the payment within time to
employees, workers and creditors. In such a case, there is no complaint against
the firm. As a result, it helps a firm in creating and maintaining goodwill.
d) Rapidity of Turnover
Turnover represents the speed with which the working capital is recovered by
the sale of goods. If the turnover rate is high, lower amount of working capital
will be sufficient and vice-versa.
f) Seasonal Nature
If raw materials are expected to fall short of demand throughout the year for
some reasons, the enterprise has to buy the materials in bulk involving huge
fund i.e. working capital to make it sure that the production process will not be
interrupted during the entire year.
g) Dividend Policy
The firm having satisfactory level of earning capacity may generate cash profit
from operation. The need for working capital can be met with the retained
earnings. A firm which declares dividend and distributes large proportion of
cash irrespective of its profit need larger amount of working capital than that
which retains larger part of its profits and distributes lower amount of cash
dividend.
k) Business Cycle
Business fluctuations lead to cyclic and seasonal change which in turn, cause a
shift in the working capital position particularly for temporary working capital
requirement. During the upswing of business activity, the need for working
capital is likely to grow to cover the lag between sales and receipt of cash as
well as to finance purchases of additional material to cater to the expansion of
the level of activity. The downswing phase of business cycle has exactly an
opposite effect on the level of working capital requirement.
l) Production Policy
The quantum of working capital is also determined by production policy. In the
case of certain lines of business, the demand for product is seasonal, that is,
they are purchased during certain months of the year. During the slack season,
the firms have to maintain their working force and physical facilities without
adequate production and sale. When the peak period arrives, the firms have to
operate at full capacity to meet the demand. In this situation, it can either
confine its production only that period when goods are sold or follow a steady
production policy. The former policy does not need more working capital than
the latter does. A production policy in tune with the changing demands may be
preferable.
n) Level of Taxes
The first appropriation out of profits is payment or provision for tax. Tax
liability, in a sense, is a short-term liability payable in cash. An adequate
provision for tax payments, therefore, is an important aspect of working capital
planning. If tax liability increases, it leads to an increase in the requirement of
working capital and vice-versa.
b. Internal Factors
Lending policy of bank: Great quantity for long-term investment needs
high liquidity and if short-term loan policy, low liquidity.
Management capacity: If management is efficient & ready to bear risk,
low liquidity.
Strategic planning & funds flow situation: Liquidity depends upon
planning, & strategy. Current A/C needs high liquidity & payment. On
the other hand fixed deposit needs low liquidity.
c. Moderate Policy
This is the policy that lies between relaxed and restricted policies. In this
policy, a firm holds the amount of current assets in between the relaxed and
restricted policies. Both risk and return are moderate in this policy.
Figure: 2.1
Alternative Current Assets Investment Policies
Figure: 2.2
Aggressive Financing Policy
b. Conservative Policy
This is the policy in which all of the fixed assets, all of the permanent current
assets, and some of the temporary current assets of a firm are financed with
long-term capital. This is a very safe financing policy and, therefore, not very
appropriate from the standpoint of profit.
Figure: 2.3
Conservative Financing Policy
At the limit, a firm could attempt to match exactly the maturity structures of its
assets and liabilities. Inventory expected to be sold in 30 days could be
financed with a 30-day bank loan; a machine expected to last for five years
could be financed by a 5-year loan; a 20-year building could be financed by a
20-year mortgage bond; and so forth. In this policy, generally, the firm finances
permanent current assets with long term financing and temporary with short-
term financing. It means the firm matches the maturity of financing sources
with an assets useful life. It lies between the aggressive and conservative
policies.
Figure: 2.4
Maturity Matching Policy
Need of working capital is directly related to firms growth. A firm can have
different level of current assets to support the same level of output. The level of
current assets can be measured by relating current assets to fixed assets. Its
proportion upon the fixed assets of the firm indicates the working capital policy
of the firm namely conservative and aggressive in two extreme ends. Dividing
current assets by fixed assets gives Current Assets to Fixed Assets (CA/FA)
ratio. Assuming a constant level of fixed assets, a higher CA/FA ratio indicates
a conservative current assets policy and a lower CA/FA ratio means an
aggressive current assets policy assuming other factors to be constant. A
conservative policy implies greater liquidity or lower risk, while an aggressive
policy indicates higher risk and poor liquidity (Panday, 1999.:822). Higher
level of current assets implies greater liquidity and solvency of the firm. There
is less risk of technical insolvency, but a considerable amount of funds will be
tied up in current assets, which causes to lower the profitability. On the other
side, to have a higher profitability, a firm can take an aggressive current assets
policy maintaining lower level of current assets, which will lower the solvency
of the firm and the level of risk in the same manner. Thus the reasonable
approach is to balance the cost of maintaining current assets and risk associated
in such a way that the tradeoff between risk and return is minimized.
Figure: 2.5
Alternative Current Assets Policies
A
Conservative Policy
B
Level of current assets
Average Policy
C
Aggresive Policy
Van Horne (2000) another well known expert of financial management and
writer in his book Financial Management and Policy, has given the concept
of capital management, it is usually described as involving the administration
of these assets namely cash, marketable securities, receivables, inventories and
the administration of current liabilities. It means the working capital
management is concerned with the problem that arises in attempting to manage
the current assets, the current liabilities and the inter-relationship that exist
between them. He has also described the different methods for efficient
management of cash and marketable securities and various models for
balancing cash and marketable securities. For the management of receivable,
different credit and collection policies have been described and various
principles of inventory have been examined for inventory management and
control.
Mahat has defined that working capital management is one of the important
pillars of corporate finance. However, Nepalese industries are facing difficulty
in their survival by the cause of recession, which can bring best and worst in
corporate finance such an environment should be efficient enough to cope with
the possible worst happenings in future for working capital management. He
has said that managing the working capital resources for a profit making
industries are routine affairs of just making payment and arranging collection
of debtors. In contrast, the company in debt trouble, it is rather difficult to meet
its working capital gap by way of debt financing, the company should have to
bear interest, which may cause to increase in the percentage of operating
expenses to the turnover and depletion in the profits. Therefore, spontaneous
sources of working capital will be a better source for working capital in order
to improve its performance.
Major Findings:
The average major components of the current assets i.e. cash and bank
balance, loan and advance are higher in NIBL, money at call or short
notice, government securities and miscellaneous assts are higher at
SCBNL.
The liquidity position of sample banks are analyzed with the current
ratio and quick ratio has highest current ratio and SCBNL has highest
quick ratio.
Correlation between government securities and total deposit of sample
banks are not significant; it shows that there is not close relationship
between two variables. But there is highly significant correlation
between loan and advance and total deposit of NABIL, NIBL and
SCBNL. The banks have better utilization of their loan and advance and
total deposit. There is positive correlation between cash and bank and
current liabilities and highly significant in NABIL, NIBL and SCBNL.
Therefore, the banks have been better utilization of their cash and bank
balance and current liabilities.
The composition of working capital are cash and bank balance, money
at call or short notice, loan and advance, government securities and
miscellaneous current assets are significantly different. There is
significant difference in composition of working capital among NABIL,
NIBL and SCBNL. Since, the mean value of loan and advance on total
current assets of sample banks are significantly high and invest their
fund in income generating sector.
The liquidity position of the sample banks current ratio is not
significantly different. But quick ratio is significantly different in
liquidity position of NABIL, NIBL and SCBNL. The mean value of
current ratio of NIBL is higher than NABIL and SCBNL but quick ratio
of SCBNL is higher, however, liquidity position of SCBNL is better.
Major Recommendations:
SCBNL segregates very low portion in the loan and advance, so it is
unable to maximize the shareholders value. SCBNL should increase
loan and advance portion. The bank should improve its current
investment policy about loan and advance.
All the sample banks liquidity position is not good. Their current and
quick ratio is lower than normal standards. So they have faced liquidity
problem. It is better, as soon as SCBNL, NABIL and NIBL try to
maintain the standard by increasing current and quick assets.
By adopting the matching working capital management policy instead of
adopting conservative policy these banks can improve their profitability
in the short as well as in the long run.
All of three banks need to utilize the outsiders as well as insiders fund
effectively and efficiently on order to keep all the stakeholders happy.
As the service of these banks have been limited to urban and semi urban
regions of the nation, they should imitate some measures to widen their
reach to the people of rural areas,
These banks should also focus on research and development activities in
order to retain and keep their position up, as more and more players are
entering into the limited market of banking industry of Nepal.
Major Recommendations:
The companies should formulate appropriate working capital policies as
per their need, invest idle fund in marketable securities, and adopt
definite credit and collection policies.
The researcher suggests the companies to initiate steps towards
minimizing administrative and operating expenses, maintain proper
relation and interaction among production, marketing and sales
departments.
It is suggested to develop appropriate information system in determining
exact need of working capital.
There should be training, participation in the management conferences,
foreign enterprises tour etc. for employees in order to increase their
efficiency.
Dahal (2010) has done a research on A Case Study of a Working Capital and
its Impact with reference to NIC and NABIL Bank
Main Objectives:
To analyze the liquidity, assets utilization, long term solvency and
profitability position of Banks.
To study the current assets and current liabilities and their impact on
liquidity and profitability.
To provide appropriate recommendation and suggestion for the
improvement of the working capital management and enhancing the
profitability scenario of Nepalese commercial banks.
Major findings:
The average cash and bank balance percentage and loans and advances
percentage are higher in NIC than NABIL. But the average government
securities percentage is higher in NABIL than NIC.
The liquidity position of NIC is better than NABIL. The trend of
Liquidity ratio i.e. quick ratio and cash and bank balance ratio of both
banks are decreasing. The both banks tried to reduce its idle money,
however, it is shown that the liquidity position of NIC is always better
than NABIL. It means NIC is bearing Lower risk, which mean lower
profits in commercial banks; higher liquidity is not always the cause of
Lower profitability.
NABIL has better turnover than NIC. Thus NABIL has better utilization
of deposits in income generating activity than NIC. However, NIC is
utilizing its saving deposit in loans and advances more effectively than
NABIL.
Profitability measures the efficiency of the firm. The profitability
position of NABIL is far better than NIC although the interest earned by
NABIL and NIC is equal.
The average long term debt to net worth ratio of NABIL is higher than
that of NIC. So NABIL has higher proportion of outsiders claim in total
capitalization than NIC or NABIL has more risky and aggressive capital
structure than NIC.
Correlation between cash and bank balance and current liabilities in
NABIL bank is positive which shows the positive relationship between
two variables. On the other hand, coefficient of correlation between cash
and bank balance to current liabilities in case of NIC also shows positive
relationship. After considering the probable error there is highly
significant relationship between net working capital and net profit in
both banks.
The mean value of current ratio and quick ratio of NABIL are
statistically different than NIC. But the cash and bank balance to deposit
ratio are not significantly different.
The mean value of interest earned to total assets ratio is not significantly
different, but net profit to total assets and net profit to total deposit are
significantly different of NABIL and NIC.
Major recommendations:
The large portions of total current assets of both NABIL and NIC banks
have cover by loans and advances and it is decreasing in NABIL and
increasing in NIC. As, banks should give priority to invest their fund on
loan and advances to get higher return, NABIL has not as much of loans
and advances proportion on total current assets than NIC. So, NABIL
should seriously adjust its policy of investment on loans and advances.
Total deposits turns over position of studied banks are less than one
which is not satisfactory. Fixed deposits and savings deposits turn over
position are satisfactory on both NABIL and NIC banks. Though, saving
deposits turns over of both NABIL and NIC is satisfactory, NABIL is
not utilizing short term fund of outsiders more effectively than NIC.
Although interest earned to total assets ratio is equal on both banks, net
profit ratio is higher in NABIL than NIC. It may be due to higher cost
on NIC. So, NIC should give an attention of reducing cost of operation
so it can have least operation cost, which further maximize its
profitability and maximize shareholders return.
The average current ratio of NIC is higher than that of NABIL. It helps
to conclude that the liquidity position of NABIL is worse than that of
NABIL. So NABIL should give attention to increase the current assets
to build ability to meet its current obligation.
Due to the large amount of term debt and low net worth the proportion
of outsiders claim in total capitalization is higher in NABIL. NABIL
has more risky and aggressive capital structure than NIC. Though both
banks use high short term liabilities to cover total capital, NABIL should
decrease the long term to increase the degree of protection against long
term creditors and to protect total capital against long term debt.
Major Findings:
The net working capital of NBBL is negative in some year so the
sufficient amount of working capital for operational requirement for
NBBL in case of EBL, the net working capital is positive.
There is very high variability of net working capital maintained by
NBBL and EBL.
In case of EBL fluctuation of the study period, this shows that EBL is
more efficiency than NBBL.
The profitability position of NBBL is better than EBL.
Correlation between investment on government security and total
deposit of EBL is highly significant. It shows that there is close
relationship between investment on government securities and total
deposit of EBL. However, it is not significant in case of NBBL.
While testing the hypothesis of composition of working capital, it has
been observed that the mean value of proportion of cash and bank
balance, loan and advance and government securities of NBBL and EBL
are not statistically different.
While testing the hypothesis of liquidity management it has been
observed that the mean value of current ratio, quick ratio, and cash and
bank balance to deposit ratio of NBBL and EBL are not significantly
different. It shows that liquidity management policy of these banks is
significantly difference.
While testing the hypothesis of profitability position, it is observed that
the mean value of net profit to total assets, net profit to total deposit and
interest on to total assets of NBBL is not statistically different from that
of EBL.
Major Recommendations:
The loan and advances percentage as a part of current assets of EBL was
in the increasing trend. So, it should review, its policy are to reverse the
trend, as they are most productive assets. On the other hand the average
loan and advances percentage as a part of current assets of NBBL was
just more than EBL. So, it should increase the percentage by adopting
new policies.
The standard liquidity ratio should be 2:1, but the low liquidity ratio of
both banks suggests that they should enhance their liquidity position by
keeping optimum current assets.
Both of the banks had low average turnover on total deposits which is
less than one. Due to low turnover non earning idle funds might be high
on these banks. So, these banks should give proper attention on the
utilization of idle funds in more productive sector.
Low return on assets of EBL suggests that it should cut down its
operating cost in order to maximize its profitability.
Both the banks need to utilize the outsiders as well as insiders fund
effectively and efficiently in order to keep all the stakeholders happy.
These banks should also focus on research and development activities in
order to retain and keep their position up, as more and more players are
entering into the limited market of banking industry in Nepal.
As the services of these banks have been limited to urban and semi
urban areas of the nation they should imitate some measures to widen
their reach to the rural areas.
CHAPTER - III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The study aims to portraying accurately on the working capital (or current
assets and current liabilities) and its impact on overall financial position of
sample banks. It is based on recent 5 years data from F/Y 2064/065 to
2068/069. The study has been conducted to assess the existing situation of
working capital management of commercial banks and describe the situation
and events occurring at present. The research design followed for this study is
basically a historical, empirical and descriptive-cum-analytical.
H) Return on Equity
This ratio measures the efficiency of the bank in optimally utilizing the
shareholders equity in generating profit. Higher the return on equity indicates
that the bank has adopted aggressive working capital policy, and thus the bank
is risk taker.
Where,
N = Number of items in the series.
X = mean
X = Variable
C) Coefficient of Variation
Karl Pearson developed this measurement to measure the relative dispersion. It
is used in such problems where we want to compare the variability of two or
more series. It is denoted by C.V. and is obtained by dividing the arithmetic
mean to standard deviation. Thus,
D) Coefficient of Correlation
The correlation analysis refers to the techniques used in measuring the
closeness of the relationship between the variables. It helps us in determining
the degree of relationship between two or more variables. It doesn't tell us
anything about cause and effect relationship. It describes not only the
magnitude of correlation but also its direction. The coefficient of correlation is
a number, which indicates to what extent two things (variables) are related to
what extent variations in one go with the variations in the other.
The value of coefficient of correlation as obtained shall always lie between +1,
a value of 1 indicating a perfect negative relationship between the variables,
of +1 a perfect positive relationship, and of no relationship when correlation
coefficient is zero. The zero correlation coefficient means the variables are
uncorrected. It is defined by Karl Pearson as:
E) Probable Error
The probable error denoted by P.E. is used to measure the reliability and test of
significance of correlation coefficient. Significance of relationship has been
tested by using the probable error (P.E.) and it is denoted by the following
model:
F) Regression Analysis
Regression is a statistical method for investing relationships between the
variables by the establishment of an approximate functional relationship
between them. It is considered as a useful tool for determining the strength of
relationship between two or more variables. The regression line of Y on X is
given by;
G) Trend Analysis
A widely and most commonly used method to describe the trend is the method
of least square. Let the trend line between the dependent variable y and the
independent variable x (i.e. time) be represented by;
Yc = a + bx (i)
Where,
a = y intercept or value of y when x = 0
b = slope of the trend line or amount of change that comes in y of a unit change
in x.
This chapter has the purpose of fulfilling the main objective of the present
study. So this is the crucial part of this study. This chapter of has divided into
three sub parts. The first part presents secondary data analysis, like as total
assets financing, composition of debt, gross and net working capital status of
selected Banks analyze which includes size, structure and utilization of current
assets and current liabilities, liquidity and profitability position, relation
between current assets and total assets as well as fixed assets, financing
policies etc. of Banks. Second part focuses on presentation and analysis of
primary data and finally third part presents major findings of the analysis.
The above table and figure show the method adopted by the banks to finance
the total assets. The table reveals that each bank gives predilection to debt
capital than equity capital while financing the total assets. Thus, the total assets
of each bank can be considered risky. Looking individually, the equity capital
of NIBL has followed increasing trend and thus has ranged from 7.61% in the
fiscal year 2007/08 to 7.71% in the fiscal year 2011/12. Similarly, the debt
financing of the bank has ranged from 92.39% in the fiscal year 2007/08 to
92.29% in the fiscal year 2011/12. In average, NIBL has financed the total
assets by 7.76% inside fund and 92.24% outside fund. Also, the coefficient of
variation in inside funding is 5.84% and that in outside funding is 0.45%.
However, the percentage of debt financing in total assets of HBL has decreased
during the period and the percentage of equity financing has increased
simultaneously. The equity financing to total assets of HBL has ranged from
6.40% in the fiscal year 2007/08 to 8.65% in the fiscal year 2011/12. Likewise,
the debt financing to total assets has gradually decreased from 93.60% in the
fiscal year 2007/08 to 91.35% in the fiscal year 2011/12. In average, HBL
financed 7.60% of the total assets through equity capital and 92.40% of the
total assets with debt capital.
Similarly, the percentage of equity financing in EBL has fluctuating the
percentage of debt financing has also irregular. The equity capital has ranged
from 5.61% in the fiscal year 2007/08 to 6.55% in the fiscal year 2011/12, and
debt capital has ranged from 94.39% to 93.45% in the same fiscal year. In
average, the equity capital and debt capital have represented 6.38% and 93.62%
of the total assets respectively.
Alike in EBL, NABIL has practiced to deduct the internal fund and increase
the outside fund while financing the total assets. The equity financing in
NABIL has ranged from 7.55% in the fiscal year 2007/08 to 7.12% in the fiscal
year 2011/12 and debt financing has ranged from 92.45% to 92.88% in the
same fiscal year respectively. In average, NABIL financed 7.14% of the total
assets through equity capital and 92.86% of the total assets through debt
capital. The coefficient of variation on equity financing is 5.19%, indicating
quite uniformity and debt financing is 0.40%, indicating high uniformity.
Comparatively the debt capital representation is extensively higher than the
equity capital in all the selected banks, and thus represents much risk in total
assets of the bank. In addition it can be considered that the total assets of HBL
and NABIL are much riskier than that of NIBL and NABIL, since the debt
capital representation in EBL and NABIL is higher.
Figure: 4.2
Total Debt Composition
The above table and Figure show the financing policy of the banks through
debt. The table depicts that all the banks have extensively used short term debt
than long term debt. The use of long term debt does not cross 5% of the total
debt capital. Looking each bank, NIBL has not used long term debt in the fiscal
year 2007/08 to 2011/12. Thus, long term debt represents 1.84% in lowest to
2.27% in highest. In average the long term covers only 2.01% of the total debt
capital however the coefficient of variation is 8.06% indicating high
inconsistency. The long term debt financing percentage and short term debt
financing percentage, however, in HBL are in fluctuating trend and thus the
long term debt financing percentage has ranged from 0.87% in the fiscal year
2011/12 to 1.90% in the fiscal year 2007/08. The short term debt financing
percentage has ranged from 98.10% in the fiscal year 2007/08 to 99.13% in the
fiscal year 2011/12. In average, the long term debt financing and short term
debt financing have represented 1.64 % and 98.36% of the total debt capital.
Similarly, the long term debt capital percentage has followed decreasing trend
and the short term debt capital percentage has followed increasing trend for the
first four fiscal years in EBL. The short term debt capital and long term debt
capital have represented 98.43% and 1.57% of the total debt capital in average.
Similarly, the mobilization of long term debt in NABIL is quite higher than that
of NIBL and thus has ranged from 1.84% in the fiscal year 2007/08 to 2.27% in
the fiscal year 2011/12. It seems that use of long term debt percentage in
NABIL has been increasing trend up to year 2009/10. Simultaneously, the short
term debt percentage has been in decreasing trend up to year 2009/10. Short
term debt has ranged from 96.50% in the fiscal year 2007/08 to 99.12% in the
fiscal year 2011/12. In average, the short term debt and long term debt
represent 2.93% and 97.07% of the total debt. Also, the variation in long term
debt financing percentage is extensively higher than that of short term debt
financing.
Considering the composition of total debt capital, it can be assumed that the
working capital of the banks is much riskier, since uses of higher short term
debt demands repayment in every few month, which ultimately desires higher
liquidity and thus can cause bankruptcy in case of low current assets. Further,
the interest rates on short term debt fluctuate widely than in long term debt.
Table: 4.3
Gross Working Capital Status
(Rs. in Millions)
FY NIBL HBL EBL NABIL
GWC Growth GWC Growth GWC Growth GWC Growth
% % % %
2007/08 23232.53 7.89 32945.08 13.92 21262.47 34.51 26966.50 22.51
2008/09 24953.98 7.40 35449.46 7.60 26788.84 25.99 36534.72 35.48
2009/010 25234.48 1.12 38368.12 8.23 36489.68 36.21 43206.40 18.26
2010/011 26445.90 4.80 41655.25 8.57 40919.67 12.14 51370.70 18.89
2011/012 24239.53 4.58 43882.90 5.34 42727.95 4.42 55239.67 7.53
Mean 24,619.88 5.16 38,460.16 8.73 33,637.72 22.65 42,663.60 20.53
S.D. 1,385.03 2.70 4,447.01 3.16 9,271.55 13.93 11,382.31 10.05
C.V.% 5.63 52.33 11.56 36.20 27.56 61.50 26.68 48.97
(Source: Appendix I)
Figure: 4.3
Gross Working Capital Status
The above table and figure present the gross working capital, i.e. current assets,
situation of the bank. Clearly, the gross working capital of the banks has
gradually increased during the periods. The gross working capital of NIBL has
increased from Rs. 23232.53 millions in the fiscal year 2007/08 to Rs.
24239.53 millions in the fiscal year 2011/12. In average, the bank has
maintained Rs. 24,619.88 millions working capital. And the coefficient of
variation in the working capital is 5.63%, indicating quite inconsistency.
Further the growth rate of working capital has varied from 7.89 % in the fiscal
year 2007/08 to 4.58% in the fiscal year 2011/12. In average, the growth rate of
working capital is 5.16%. Likewise, the working capital of HBL has been
increased from Rs. 32945.08 millions in the fiscal year 2007/08 to Rs.
43882.90 millions in the fiscal year 2011/12. In average the working capital of
HBL is Rs. 38,460.16 millions. Also, the growth rate of working capital has
ranged from 13.92% in the fiscal year 2007/08 to 5.34% in the fiscal year
2011/12. The average growth rate in gross working capital of bank is 8.73 %,
however, the inconsistency in growth rate is higher.
Similarly, the gross working capital of EBL has increased from Rs. 21262.47
millions in the fiscal year 2007/08 to Rs. 42727.95 millions in the last year.
Consequently the growth rate in gross working capital of EBL has ranged from
34.51 % in the fiscal year 2007/08 to 4.42% in the fiscal year 2011/12. In
average, the gross working capital of EBL is Rs. 33,637.72 millions and the
growth rate is 22.65%.
Alike in other banks, the working capital of NABIL is lowest, Rs. 26966.50
millions, in the fiscal year 2007/08 and by the arrival of the fiscal year 2011/12,
it has been raised to Rs. 55239.67 millions. In average, the working capital in
NABIL is Rs. 42,663.60 millions and the coefficient of variation is 26.68%,
indicating high inconsistency. Similarly, the working capital of the bank has
grown up by 7.53% in lowest in the fiscal year 2010/11 and by 35.48% in
highest in the fiscal year 2008/09.
Summarizing the analysis, it can be concluded that the banks have paid attention
to increase the gross working capital to have sound liquidity management.
Among the four banks, NABIL has highest gross working capital however HBL
has left behind NABIL in raising the gross working capital.
Table: 4.4
Net Working Capital Status
(Rs. in millions)
FY NIBL HBL EBL NABIL
NWC Growth NWC Growth NWC Growth NWC Growth
% % % %
2007/08 2848.78 21.25 2168.41 25.34 1331.42 19.87 2652.73 21.42
2008/09 2920.88 25.30 2730.10 25.90 1860.74 39.76 3439.16 29.65
2009/010 3482.45 19.23 2667.68 -2.29 2388.47 28.36 4450.56 29.41
2010/011 3245.46 6.80 2877.35 7.86 3000.65 25.63 3430.14 -22.93
2011/012 3132.44 3.89 2732.42 5.04 3105.47 3.50 3597.25 4.87
Mean
3126.0 15.29 2635.19 12.37 2337.35 23.42 3513.97 18.88
S.D. 255.10 9.40 272.05
56.75 753.60 13.28 640.02 29.00
C.V.% 8.16 61.45 10.32
91.75 32.24 56.70 18.21 123.57
(Source: Appendix I)
Figure: 4.4
Net Working Capital Status
The above table and Figure show the net working capital of the banks. It is
clear that the net working capital of NIBL is in increasing trend within the five
year periods. The net working capital of such bank is lowest, i.e. Rs. 2848.78
millions, in the fiscal year 2007/08 and highest, i.e. Rs. 3482.45 millions, in the
fiscal year 2009/10. In average, the net working capital of the bank is Rs.
3126.00 millions, and has grown up by 3.89% in lowest in the fiscal year
2011/12. The highest growth rate is 25.30% in the fiscal year 2008/09. In
average the net working capital of the bank has been raised by 15.29%,
although the current assets, gross working capital, and current liabilities of the
HBL have increased during the periods, the net working capital has fluctuated
during the periods. This indicates that increment in the gross working capital
and the increment in short term debt have differed. The net working capital is
lowest, Rs. 2168.41 millions, in the fiscal year 2007/08 and highest, Rs.
2877.35 millions, in the fiscal year 2010/11. In average, the net working capital
of the bank is Rs. 2635.19 millions and the increment is 12.37 % annually.
However, the net working capital in EBL has increased by near about 3 times
within the five year periods and thus has reached to Rs. 3105.47 millions in the
fiscal year 2011/12 from Rs. 1331.42 millions in the fiscal year 2007/08. In
average, the net working capital of EBL is Rs. 2337.35 millions and the growth
rate in such capital is 23.42 % in average.
Alike in NIBL, the net working capital in NABIL is also in increasing trend
and thus has reach Rs. 2652.73 millions in the base year 2007/08 to Rs.
3597.25 millions in the final year 2011/12. Also, the growth rate of NWC has
ranged from 21.42% in the fiscal year 2007/08 to 4.87% in the fiscal year
2011/12. In average, the NWC is Rs. 3513.97 millions and average growth rate
is 18.21% and the coefficient of variation in NWC is 123.57%, indicating
inconsistency.
The table clearly indicates that the banks have given more concentrations in
increasing the current assets by greater amount than increasing the current
liabilities. Thus it can be concluded that the banks are following aggressive
working capital policy, since the short term debt has been extensively used to
finance current assets. Even though the net working capital of NABIL is
highest, the growth rate in net working capital of EBL is highest, from which it
can be considered that EBL has paid greatest attention in increasing net
working capital than other does.
Table: 4.5
Working Capital Financing Policy
Bank Fiscal Year Mean S.D. C.V. %
The above table and Figure depict the working capital financing policy of the
banks. The table shows that the banks use extensive amount of short term debt
to finance the gross working capital. The financing of working capital in NIBL
through short term debt is in fluctuating trend, although it is higher, and thus
has ranged from 86.03% in the fiscal year 2007/08 to 97.88% in the fiscal year
2006/07. In average, NIBL has financed 92.74% of the working capital through
short term debt and the coefficient of variation in such financing is only 4.66%,
indicating consistency in the financing policy.
Alike in NIBL, the short term debt financing in working capital has fluctuated
in HBL as well. In average, HBL has financed 92.86% of the total working
capital through short term debt, and the coefficient of variation in such
financing policy is only 0.50%, indicating consistency. The short term debt to
working capital of bank is highest, 93.42%, in the fiscal year 2007/08 and
lowest, 92.30%, in the fiscal year 2008/09. Likewise, the short term debt has
covered 91.19% of the working capital in lowest in the fiscal year 2011/12, and
92.97% of the working capital in highest in the fiscal year 2007/08 of EBL. In
average, EBL has financed 92.72% of the working capital through short term
debt. Similarly, the short term debt to working capital of NABIL has been
fluctuated during the periods, and thus is maximum, 93.32%, In 2010/11 and is
lowest, 89.70%, in the year 2009/10. In average, the short term debt has
covered 90.99% of the total working capital of the bank, and the coefficient of
variation in the ratio is only 1.55%.
The coefficient of variation indicates high uniformity ratio in the policy.
Further, the extensive use of short term financing indicates that the banks are
risk taker and thus demand higher liquidity. Among the four banks, HBL can
be considered as the higher risk taker bank, since the utilization of short term
debt capital percentage on working capital is highest.
Figure: 4.6
Working Capital to Total Assets
The above table & Figure present the ratio of working capital to total assets of
the bank. The working capital to total capital of NIBL has been in fluctuating
trend. The ratio is 97.13% in lowest in the fiscal year 2010/11 and 98.02% in
highest in the last fiscal year. In average, the working capital has covered
97.54% of the total assets of the bank and the coefficient of variation in such
coverage is 0.439%, indicating uniformity. The uniformity in the ratio is also
verified by the paltry increment in growth rate of the ratio, i.e. from 9.2% in the
fiscal year 2007/08 to 9.2% in the fiscal year 2011/12. Similarly, the presence
of working capital in total assets in HBL has also varied throughout the
periods, and thus is maximum, 98.29%, in the fiscal year 2007/08 and
minimum, 97.51%, in the fiscal year 2010/11. In average, 97.86% of the total
assets of HBL are covered by working capital. Also, the working capital to
total assets of EBL has ranged from 99.21% in the fiscal year 2007/08 to
98.67% in the fiscal year 2008/09. In average, the ratio is 98.92% and the
variation in ratio is 0.02%, indicating high uniformity.
Likewise, the representation of total assets by working capital in NABIL has
ranged from 98.95% in the fiscal year 2007/08 to 98.75% in the fiscal year
2011/12. In average, 98.62% of the total assets of the bank have been covered
by working capital and the fluctuation in such coverage is only 0.020%. In
addition, the growth in ratio has ranged from 0.38% in the fiscal year 2007/08
to 0.25% in the fiscal year 2011/12.
On the basis of working capital to total assets, it can be concluded that NIBL
has high liquidity, since the ratio is highest in NIBL, and HBL has low
liquidity. However, all the banks differ in paltry in the ratio.
Table: 4.7
Cash Reserve Ratio
FY NRB NIBL HBL EBL NABIL
Req. CRR Excess CRR Excess CRR Excess CRR Excess
2007/08 5.00 5.02 0.02 5.92 0.92 2.94 -2.10 6.00 1.00
2008/09 5.00 5.43 0.43 5.13 0.13 4.56 -0.44 8.37 3.37
2009/010 5.00 6.70 1.70 6.76 1.26 14.26 8.76 9.03 3.53
2010/011 5.50 6.04 0.54 6.76 1.26 15.53 10.03 3.02 -2.48
2011/012 5.50 6.34 0.84 6.79 1.29 14.93 9.43 5.97 0.47
Mean 5.906 6.27 10.44 6.48
S.D. 0.68 0.74 6.15 2.37
C.V.% 11.51 11.75 58.92 36.64
(Source: Appendix I)
Figure: 4.7
Cash Reserve Ratio
The above table & Figure measures the liquidity of the bank to ensure the
security of the deposit holders. The table shows that the cash reserve ratio
maintained by NIBL is above the minimum standard set out by NRB in all the
fiscal years. The CRR of NIBL has followed increasing trend from the year
2007/08 and thus is maximum, 6.34%, in the fiscal year 2011/12 and is
minimum, 5.02%, in the fiscal year 2007/08. In average, NIBL has kept
5.906% CRR within the five year periods, and the coefficient of variation in
such ratio is 11.51%. Like as NIBL, HBL has also fully implemented the
direction of NRB regarding the minimum cash reserve ratio, and thus has
exceeded the minimum ratio in each fiscal year. The CRR of HBL is highest,
6.79%, in the fiscal year 2011/12 as well as lowest, 5.13%, in the fiscal year
2008/09, and in average the CRR is 6.27%. In contrast, fiscal year 2007/09 and
2008/09, EBL cannot meet the minimum CRR of NRB and thus represents
poor liquidity management. The CRR of EBL in the first fiscal year 2007/08,
i.e. 2.94%, is far below the minimum CRR, 5%, and in the fiscal year 2011/12,
i.e. 14.93%, is far above the minimum CRR. Whatever, in average the CRR of
EBL is 10.44% and the coefficient of variation in the ratio is 58.92%,
indicating high inconsistency. However, NABIL has not met the minimum
standard of NRB in the fiscal year 2010/11., which may be pernicious to
security of deposit holders. The CRR maintained by NABIL has ranged from
3.02% in the fiscal year 2010/11 to 9.03% in the fiscal year 2009/10, and in
average the ratio is 6.48%.
Comparing four banks, it can be concluded that the NIBL is advanced to other
banks in managing liquidity. Next to NIBL, HBL has managed the liquidity
better than other banks, while EBL is inferior in managing liquidity. Thus it
can be inferred that NIBL is quite success in managing working capital to have
sound liquidity position.
The above table & Figure present the achievement of the banks in terms of
return on equity and the relationship of ROE with the equity growth. The table
shows that the return on equity of NIBL has fluctuated during the periods. The
ROE is highest, 19.95%, in the fiscal year 2010/11 and lowest, 13.45%, in the
fiscal year 2011/12. In average, the bank achieved 15.79% of the equity capital
as return. Also, the growth rate of working capital has ranged from 15.25% in
the fiscal year 2007/08 to 22.96% in the fiscal year 2010/11. Likewise, the
return on equity of HBL for the fiscal year 2007/08 is 22.91%, which has
increased to 25.03% in the fiscal year 2008/09, further has decreased to 13.34%
in the fiscal year 2011/12. In average, the return on equity is 20.09%, which
indicates that HBL has generated Rs. 20.09 from Rs. 100 mobilization of
equity capital to finance working capital. Also, the coefficient of variation of
27.83% in the ratio indicates quite uniformity in the ratio. However, the
relationship of return on equity on equity capital growth is in inverse order. In
other words, the return on equity has increased in the year when the equity
capital growth has decreased in the same year compared to that in the previous
year. Also, the ROE of EBL has ranged from 24.67% in the fiscal year 2007/08
to 29.45% in the fiscal year 2011/12, and in average the ROE is 27.25%,
indicating generation of Rs. 27.35 return from Rs. 100 investment of equity
capital. Finally, the growth rate of working capital has ranged from 24.67 % in
the fiscal year 2007/08 to 29.45% in the fiscal year 2011/12.
Similarly, the ROE of NABIL has been found to be in irregular trend and thus
has ranged from 29.70% in the fiscal year 2010/11 to 32.94 in the fiscal year
2009/10. In average, NABIL has generated 31.34% of equity capital as return.
In addition, the growth rate on equity capital of the bank has ranged from
9.71% in the fiscal year 2007/08 to 39.46% in the fiscal year 2011/12, and thus
has no perfect inverse relationship with ROE.
Thus, it can be said that HBL is following perfect aggressive working capital
policy, since the principle of working capital states that when the return on
equity increases and equity capital decreases, the working capital is said to be
aggressive. However, in other bank there is no such strong inverse relationship.
Although, it cant be ignored that, the remaining banks are also following
aggressive working capital policy.
Table: 4.9
Correlation & Regression Analysis between Net Profit & Net Working Capital
Correlation between Net Profit & NWC Regression Equation
Bank R r2 P.E. 6 P.E. Remarks
NIBL 0.1301 0.0169 0.2965 1.7793 Significant NP = 937.065 + 0.372
NWC
HBL 0.7405 0.5484 0.1362 0.8174 Significant NP = 327.60 + 0.16 NWC
EBL 0.5783 0.3345 0.2008 1.2045 Significant NP = 205.94 + 0.15 NWC
NABIL 0.9993 0.9986 0.0004 0.0026 Insignificant NP = -124.93 + 0.32NWC
(Source: Appendix II)
The above table shows the relationship between the net working capital and the
net profit after tax. The table delineates that the net profit of EBL and HBL has
positive relationship with the net working capital. NIBL and NABIL have
Negative relationship with the net working capital thus net profit
increases/decreases with the increment/decrement in net working capital with
respect to EBL and HBL. The correlation between net profit and net working
capital of NIBL is 0.1301, HBL is 0.7405, EBL is 0.5783 and NABIL is
0.9993. Also, the coefficient of determination indicates that 1.69%, 54.84%,
33.45% 99.86% variation in net profit of NIBL, HBL, EBL and NABIL
respectively has been explained by change in net working capital.
The probable error in the relationship between these two variables is 0.2965,
0.1362, 0.2008, and 0.0004 and the six times probable error is 1.7793, 0.8174,
1.2045, and 0.0026 in NIBL, HBL, EBL and NABIL, respectively. Since, the
value of r is greater than the calculated 6 P.E. of NIBL and EBL, it can be
considered that the relationship between net profit and net working capital is
statistically significant in these banks, and thus net profit increases with the
increase in net working capital and vice-versa. On the other hand the value of
r is smaller than the calculated 6 P.E. of HBL and NABIL, it can be
considered that the statistically relationship between net profit and net working
capital is not significant in case of these banks, and thus net profit is not
increases with the increase in net working capital and vice-versa.
Further, the regression line of net profit on net working capital indicates that
the net profit increases by Rs. 0. 37 in NIBL, Rs. 0.16 in HBL, Rs. 0.15 in
EBL, and Rs. 0.32 in NABIL with per rupee increment in net working capital,
if the other variable of the respective banks remains constant.
Since the value of r is greater than the value of 6 P.E. in each bank, certainly
there exists statistically significant relationship between net profit and short
term debt in each bank. And, thus net profit increases/decreases with the
increase in decrease in short term debt. Thus, the bank will earn more profit by
using higher short term debt to finance the working capital. Consequently, the
regression line of net profit on short term debt indicates that net profit of the
NIBL increases by Rs. 0.09, HBL increases by Rs. 0.02, EBL increases by Rs.
0.01, and NABIL increases by Rs. 0.03, if the respective variable remains
constant.
To verify this statement, the probable error and 6 P.E. have been determined.
The probable error in the relationship is 0.0619, 0.2908, 0.2858 and 0.0351 and
the 6 P.E. is 0.3713, 1.7447, 1.7150 and 0.2108 in NIBL, HBL, EBL and
NABIL respectively. The relationship between these two variables is
statistically insignificant in NIBL, HBL and EBL, since the value of r is
lower than the value of 6 P.E, and statistically significant in NABIL, since the
value of r is greater than the value of 6 P.E. Hence net profit may not increase
by Rs. 0.10 in NIBL and Rs. 0. 06 in HBL, and certainly increases by Rs.0.15
in EBL and Rs. 1.16 in NABIL with per rupee increment in long term debt, as
the regression line specifies, if the respective variable remains stable.
Figure: 4.9
Trend Analysis of Net Working Capital
Table: 4.16
Role of Working Capital
No. of Respondents Total
Responses High Level Middle Level Shareholder No. %
Employee Employee
Highly 4 4 8 16 67
Important
Important 0 2 4 6 25
Not so 0 2 0 2 8
Important
Total 4 8 12 24 100
(Source: Field Survey, 2013)
The table manifests the responses of the surveyed respondents regarding the
magnificent of the performance role of the working capital for sound financial
management. The table emblazons that the entire high level employee
considered as working capital role to be highly important for the financial
management of the banks. However, only 4 out of 8 middle level employees
have considered as highly important, and only 8 out of 12 shareholders have
considered being most crucial for financial management. Likewise, 2 out of 8
middle level employees and 4 out of 12 shareholders have considered the role
of working capital as only important for efficient financial management of the
banks. In contrast, 2 out of 8 middle level employees have considered role of
working capital weighs not so important role for the success of financial
management of banks.
In overall, the majority of the respondents, 16 out of 24, indicating 67% of the
total respondents, have considered the performance role of working capital is
highly important for smooth running of business. Likewise, only 25% (6 out of
24) and 8% (2 out of 24) of the respondents give the response that the
performance role of working capital is important and not so important for
business respectively. Thus, considering the overall majority and the majority
of each category of the respondents, it can be assumed that the role of working
capital is highly significant in financial management of the bank.
Figure: 4.12
Role of Working Capital
4.2.3 Responsibility to Manage Working Capital
A well managed working capital is the necessity of every business
organization. Now, to clear the query that who is responsible to manage an
effective working capital, the respondents were asked on this regard. The
responses were obtained as shown in Table 4.17.
Table: 4.17
Responsibility to Manage Working Capital
No. of Respondents Total
Responses High Level Middle Level Shareholder No. %
Employee Employee
Top Level 4 6 10 20 83
Management
Middle Level 0 2 2 4 17
Management
Lower Level 0 0 0 0 0
Management
Total 4 8 12 12 100
(Source: Field Survey, 2013)
The table delineates that the entire high level employees have agreed that the
top level management is obliged for the effective management of working
capital. To substantiate this fact, 6 out of 8 middle level employees and 10 out
of 12 shareholders have also stated that the top level management is most
responsible for the management of working capital. In contrast to the above
statement, just 2 out of 8 middle level employees and 2 out of 12 shareholders
have claimed that the middle level management should be much onus for the
effective management of the working capital.
In overall, the majority of the total respondents, 20 out 14 (83%) have stated
that high level management is responsible for managing working capital.
Likewise, 17% respondents stated that middle level management should be
responsible to manage working capital whereas nobody pointed out Lower
Level Management to be responsible for working capital. Paraphrasing the
analysis, it can be considered, on the basis of the overall majority and the
majority of each category, the top level management should be most
responsible for the effective management of working capital.
Figure: 4.13
Responsibility to Manage Working Capital
4.2.4 Working Capital Policy
There are three types of working capital viz. aggressive, moderate and
conservative. The policy depends upon the nature of the business. So, to know
which type of working capital befits in bank, the respondents were asked on
this regard. The responses obtained from them are presented in the table: 4.18.
Table: 4.18
Working Capital Policy
No. of Respondents Total
Responses High Level Middle Level Shareholder No. %
Employee Employee
Aggressive 4 8 6 18 75
Moderate 0 0 4 4 17
Conservative 0 0 2 2 8
Total 4 8 12 24 100
(Source: Field Survey, 2013)
The table depicts that entire high level employees are in the opinion that the
bank should following aggressive working capital policy, which means that the
banks should finance its fund mostly through the debt capital, especially using
the short term debt. Also, the entire middle level employees have supported this
opinion. However, only 6 out of 12 surveyed shareholders have buttressed this
view. In contrast, 4 out of 12 shareholders have opined that the bank should
adopt moderate working capital policy, which indicates that the bank should
use the equity capital and debt capital in equal proportion to meet the fund
requirement. Finally, 2 out of 12 shareholders has stated that the bank should
adopt conservative working capital policy, indicating the equity capital should
be higher than the debt capital to reduce the risk that can arise from outside
financing.
In overall, it has been revealed that 75% of the respondents think that
aggressive working capital is the best policy for the bank, whereas 17% and 8%
of the respondents think that moderate and conservative policy is the best
policy respectively. Considering the majority of the respondents, it can be
assumed that the aggressive working capital policy would be the best policy for
the bank for having sound financial management.
Figure: 4.14
Working Capital Policy
4.2.5 Impact of Working Capital on Profitability
To know the degree of impact of working capital on profitability, the
respondents were asked whether working capital affects on profitability or not.
The responses obtained are presented in the following table.
Table: 4.19
Impact of Working Capital on Profitability
No. of Respondents Total
Responses High Level Middle Level Shareholder No. %
Employee Employee
Yes 4 6 6 16 67
No 0 0 2 2 8
Dont Know 0 2 4 6 25
Total 4 8 12 24 100
(Source: Field Survey, 2013)
The table shows that the entire high level employees, 6 out of 8 middle level
employees and 6 out of 12 shareholders are in the view that certainly the
working capital has affect on the profitability of the bank in some extent. In
contrast to this view, 2 out of 12 shareholders has opined that the working
capital policy has no relationship with the profitability of the bank, while 2 out
of 8 middle level employees and 4 out of 12 investors have opined have been
bewildered with this question and said that they have no idea on this issue.
In overall, two-third (67%) of the respondents stated that certainly working
capital policy highly impacts the level of profit earning. However, 8% of the
respondents said that working capital does not affect profitability, whereas 25%
of the respondents remained neutral. Analyzing the majority of the respondents,
and the majority of each category, it can be categorically said that working
capital policy of the bank has high impact on its profitability.
Figure: 4.15
Impact of Working Capital on Profitability
In total, most of the respondents have agreed that working capital has impact
on risk of the company. About two-third of the respondents (67%), 16 out of
24, stated that working capital policy affects the risk of the company,
approximately 17% of the respondents and 16% of the respondents said that
working capital policy does not have impact on risk of the company and
remained neutral respectively. Thus, on the basis of the overall majority and the
majority of each category of respondents, it can be concluded that working
capital policy certainly affects the risks of the banks.
Figure: 4.16
Working Capital and Risk
4.2.7 Liquidity Position
Since the liquidity ratios plays a crucial role in paying debts and preventing
company from turning bankruptcy, the respondents were asked whether the
liquidity position of the bank is appropriate. The responses obtained are
presented in the following table 4.21.
Table: 4.21
Liquidity Position
No. of Respondents Total
Responses High Level Middle Level Shareholder No. %
Employee Employee
Yes 2 2 4 8 34
No 2 6 6 14 58
Dont Know 0 0 2 2 8
Total 4 8 12 24 100
(Source: Field Survey, 2013)
The table shows that only 2 out of 4 high level management, 2 out of 8 middle
level management, and 4 out of 12 shareholders are in the view that the banks
are maintaining satisfactory level of liquidity. In contrast, 2 high level
employees, 6 middle level employees and 6 shareholders are in the opinion that
the banks are not maintaining adequate liquidity to meet the obligations and
thus it might jeopardize the credibility owned by the bank to depositors,
investors and other related bodies. However, 2 shareholders have said nothing
on this issue.
In overall, it can be considered that the liquidity position of the bank is not so
good. Almost more than half of the respondents (58%) said that the liquidity
position of the bank is not appropriate. Similarly, one-third of the respondents
(34%) stated that the liquidity position of the bank is appropriate, whereas 8%
(2 out of 24) remained neutral. This deduction has also been substantiated by
the secondary data of the observed banks, since only two observed banks have
met the minimum CRR in all the observed periods.
Figure: 4.17
Liquidity Position
Figure: 4.18
Working Capital Investment Policy
4.2.9 Factors Affecting Working Capital
On the basis of the responses collected from the respondents, the different
indicators which influence the working capital of the bank most has been
ranked as follows in the table 4.23.
Table: 4.23
Most Influential Factor of Working Capital
Influencer Basis Rank Total Weight Mean Overall
1 2 3 4 5 6 Weight Rank
Nature and Total 12 10 2 0 0 0 24 87 1.53 1
Size of High Level Employee 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 3 1.5 1
Business Middle Level Employee 6 2 0 0 0 0 8 5 1.25 1
Shareholder 4 6 2 0 0 0 12 11 1.83 1
Total 0 0 2 0 14 8 24 93 5.19 5
Current Assets High Level Employee 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 11 5.5 3
Policy Middle Level Employee 0 0 2 0 4 2 8 19 4.75 5
Shareholder 0 0 0 0 8 4 12 32 5.33 5
Total 2 2 14 6 0 0 24 268 3.17 3
High Level Employee 0 0 2 2 0 0 4 7 3.5 2
Credit Policy
Middle Level Employee 0 0 4 4 0 0 8 14 3.5 4
Shareholder 2 2 8 0 0 0 12 15 2.5 3
Total 0 4 4 16 0 0 24 237 3.47 4
Growth and High Level Employee 0 0 2 2 0 0 4 7 3.5 2
Expansion Middle Level Employee 0 2 2 4 0 0 8 13 3.25 3
Shareholder 0 2 0 10 0 0 12 22 3.67 4
Total 10 8 2 2 2 0 24 171 2 2
High Level Employee 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 3 1.5 1
Profit Margin
Middle Level Employee 2 4 0 0 2 0 8 10 2.5 2
Shareholder 6 2 2 2 0 0 12 12 2 2
Total 0 0 0 0 8 16 24 194 5.64 6
High Level Employee 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 11 5.5 3
Level of Taxes
Middle Level Employee 0 0 0 0 2 6 8 23 5.75 6
Shareholder 0 0 0 0 4 8 12 34 5.67 6
CHAPTER -V
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary
The primary goal of the developing country like Nepal is to develop economy
rapidly and to promote the welfare of the people and nation. So, very recently,
Nepal has adopted the path of economic liberalization for the sake of the
economic growth of the nation. The development process of a country involves
the proper mobilization and deployment of available resources. Financial
institutions assist in the economic development of the country and are
considered as the catalyst. Commercial banks are the major financial
institutions that occupy quite an important place in the framework in the
economy development sectors as well as in saving and investment sectors.
Commercial banks are the suppliers of finance for trade and industry and play a
vital role in the economic and financial life of the country. After the
implementation of the open market policy, joint venture commercial banks are
opened as private banks. The liberal trade and investment policies have
facilitated joint venture banks to invest in Nepal. Joint venture bank has been
helpful in transferring foreign investment and advanced technology from one
country to another. The establishment of joint venture banks gave a new
horizon to the financial sector of the country.
The main objective of the study is to study the working capital management of
banks, especially in Nepal Investment Bank Limited, Himalayan Bank Limited,
Everest Bank Limited and NABIL Bank Limited. To fulfill this objective of
this study and other specific objective as described in chapter one, an
appropriate research methodology has been developed which includes the ratio
analysis as financial tools and trend analysis, correlation coefficient as
statistical tools. The major ratio analysis consists of the composition of
working capital position, liquidity position, turnover position, capital structure
position and profitability position. Under these, main ratios and their trend
position are studied in the chapter five. In order to test the relationship between
the various components of working capital, Karl Pearsons correlation
coefficient r is calculated and analyzed.
To achieve the objectives of the study, both the primary data and secondary
data have been analyzed. The primary data has been collected by collecting the
opinions of the respondents through questionnaire, while the secondary data
have been extracted from the annual reports of the respective banks. Further,
both financial tools and statistical tools have been effectively utilized to get the
result.
Finally, the major findings have been extracted from the analysis of primary
and secondary data, and the conclusion has been made on the basis of major
findings. For the enhancement of the credit management of the sampled banks,
the recommendations have been given, considering the major findings and
conclusion, at the end of the study.
5.2 Conclusions
Working capital is regarded as the lifeblood and nerve of a business concern
and is essential to accommodate the smooth operations of any organization.
Under and over allocation of working of working capital is harmful to an
enterprise to achieve its primary objectives. Therefore, maintaining optimal
level of working capital is the crux of the problem as it is strongly related to the
tradeoff between risk and return. The following major conclusions have been
drawn:
5.3 Recommendations
On the basis of major findings and the conclusion drawn, the following
recommendations, which will undoubtedly enhance the banks performance,
are made;
Positive working capital represents the sound financial management of the
banks. Similarly, the negative working capital represents the poor
financial management. In case of concerned Banks, positive working
capital is found during the study period. This bank should be maintained
optimum size of current assets and liabilities.
The banks should follow moderate policy, to minimize the risk. They
should use equity capital as well in the same level of debt capital.
The banks should use the long term debt capital instead of large amount of
short term debt capital to reduce the risk.
The banks should follow the cash reserve ratio directed by NRB to
minimize the liquidity risk.
The observed banks should promote fixed deposit to lessen the immediate
requirement of cash and thus having sound working capital management.
Considering the cash and bank balance, the bank should increase the
portion of cash and bank balance in total assets.
Similarly, the observed banks should effectively mobilize their total
assets, shareholders equity and total deposit to maximize its profit and
sustain in long run. Also, these bank needs to reduce its cost of services to
maximize their profit.
The bank needs to adopt the best capital structure that will best suit its
interest and thus maximizes profitability and liquidity and minimizes cost.
Finally, the banks need to have highly positive relationship between loan
and advances with total deposit and loan and advances with net profit.