Judicial Candidate Ratings

Oct-12
Responses
Total with No
Response Contact Excellent Good Fair Poor Contact
Nadine L. Allen 485 295 190 39%
Integrity, Character, Objectivity 128 43% 105 36% 48 16% 14 5%
Legal Experience, Knowledge, Ability 82 28% 92 31% 93 32% 28 9%
Respect for and Courtesy to Litigants, Counsel and
Witnesses 176 60% 76 26% 30 10% 13 4%
Diligence 98 33% 93 32% 69 23% 35 12%
William D. Bell, Sr. 479 69 410 86%
Integrity, Character, Objectivity 30 43% 18 26% 15 22% 6 9%
Legal Experience, Knowledge, Ability 23 33% 21 30% 16 23% 9 13%
Respect for and Courtesy to Litigants, Counsel and
Witnesses 37 54% 20 29% 7 10% 5 7%
Diligence 23 33% 23 33% 15 22% 8 12%
Stephen L. Black 485 113 372 77%
Integrity, Character, Objectivity 81 72% 23 20% 8 7% 1 1%
Legal Experience, Knowledge, Ability 76 67% 26 23% 7 6% 4 4%
Respect for and Courtesy to Litigants, Counsel and
Witnesses 78 69% 23 20% 9 8% 3 3%
Diligence 77 68% 25 22% 9 8% 2 2%
Penelope R. Cunningham 481 143 338 70%
Integrity, Character, Objectivity 95 66% 35 24% 7 5% 6 4%
Legal Experience, Knowledge, Ability 75 52% 53 37% 8 6% 7 5%
Respect for and Courtesy to Litigants, Counsel and
Witnesses 111 78% 23 16% 3 2% 6 4%
Diligence 88 62% 42 29% 7 5% 6 4%
R. Patrick DeWine 485 283 202 42%
Integrity, Character, Objectivity 103 36% 105 37% 49 17% 26 9%
Legal Experience, Knowledge, Ability 97 34% 106 37% 55 19% 25 9%
Respect for and Courtesy to Litigants, Counsel and
Witnesses 113 40% 109 39% 37 13% 24 8%
Diligence 127 45% 95 34% 38 13% 23 8%
Patrick T. Dinkelacker 487 293 194 40%
Integrity, Character, Objectivity 223 76% 44 15% 12 4% 14 5%
Legal Experience, Knowledge, Ability 181 62% 81 28% 23 8% 8 3%
Respect for and Courtesy to Litigants, Counsel and
Witnesses 240 82% 37 13% 10 3% 6 2%
Diligence 220 75% 52 18% 15 5% 6 2%
 Responses
Total with No
Response Contact Excellent Good Fair Poor Contact
Patrick F. Fischer 488 252 236 48%
Integrity, Character, Objectivity 200 79% 26 10% 13 5% 13 5%
Legal Experience, Knowledge, Ability 204 81% 32 13% 10 4% 6 2%
Respect for and Courtesy to Litigants, Counsel and
Witnesses 196 78% 38 15% 12 5% 6 2%
Diligence 201 80% 35 14% 9 4% 7 3%
Leslie E. Ghiz 481 124 357 74%
Integrity, Character, Objectivity 30 24% 20 16% 34 27% 40 32%
Legal Experience, Knowledge, Ability 20 16% 31 25% 29 23% 44 35%
Respect for and Courtesy to Litigants, Counsel and
Witnesses 26 21% 30 24% 17 14% 51 41%
Diligence 26 21% 35 28% 26 21% 37 30%
Martha H. Good 478 63 415 87%
Integrity, Character, Objectivity 23 37% 9 14% 15 24% 16 25%
Legal Experience, Knowledge, Ability 15 24% 11 17% 13 21% 24 38%
Respect for and Courtesy to Litigants, Counsel and
Witnesses 21 33% 14 22% 11 17% 17 27%
Diligence 16 25% 10 16% 14 22% 23 37%
Steven E. Martin 486 353 133 27%
Integrity, Character, Objectivity 255 72% 66 19% 20 6% 12 3%
Legal Experience, Knowledge, Ability 271 77% 63 18% 10 3% 9 3%
Respect for and Courtesy to Litigants, Counsel and
Witnesses 251 71% 54 15% 27 8% 21 6%
Diligence 278 79% 56 16% 12 3% 7 2%
Heather S. Russell 480 202 278 58%
Integrity, Character, Objectivity 117 58% 37 18% 22 11% 26 13%
Legal Experience, Knowledge, Ability 100 50% 58 29% 24 12% 20 10%
Respect for and Courtesy to Litigants, Counsel and
Witnesses 111 55% 45 22% 20 10% 26 13%
Diligence 113 56% 52 26% 22 11% 15 7%
Bruce B. Whitman 482 142 340 71%
Integrity, Character, Objectivity 89 63% 29 20% 13 9% 11 8%
Legal Experience, Knowledge, Ability 91 64% 34 24% 10 7% 7 5%
Respect for and Courtesy to Litigants, Counsel and
Witnesses 97 68% 22 15% 13 9% 10 7%
Diligence 92 65% 30 21% 15 11% 5 4%
John M. Williams 475 136 339 71%
Integrity, Character, Objectivity 104 76% 23 17% 4 3% 5 4%
Legal Experience, Knowledge, Ability 89 65% 34 25% 9 7% 4 3%
Respect for and Courtesy to Litigants, Counsel and
Witnesses 112 82% 18 13% 2 1% 4 3%
Diligence 105 77% 22 16% 5 4% 4 3%