You are on page 1of 647

M.Mani C.

Shivaraju Editors

Mealybugs
and their
Management in
Agricultural and
Horticultural crops
Mealybugs and their Management
in Agricultural and Horticultural crops
M. Mani C. Shivaraju
Editors

Mealybugs and their


Management in
Agricultural and
Horticultural crops
Editors
M. Mani C. Shivaraju
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research Indian Institute of Horticultural Research
Bangalore, India Bangalore, India

ISBN 978-81-322-2675-8 ISBN 978-81-322-2677-2 (eBook)


DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2

Library of Congress Control Number: 2016930104

Springer New Delhi Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London


Springer India 2016
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or
part of the material is concerned, specically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of
illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microlms or in any other physical way,
and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software,
or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specic statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in
this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor
the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material
contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.

Printed on acid-free paper

Springer (India) Pvt. Ltd. Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.
com)
Dedicated to my wife Vijayarani who was
involved with the work on mealybugs.
She had helped me to carryout extensive
surveys for mealybugs in different crops in
India. She has also played a major role in
nalising the draft on Mealybugs and their
Management in Agricultural and
Horticultural crops.
Foreword

Crop protection in the present day is as important as crop production. Pests


have plagued mankind from the beginning and will continue to vex the people
and thwart all their endeavors to the end. Mealybugs are sap-sucking insects
named for the powdery secretions covering the bodies. Mealybugs are soft-
bodied insects covered with waxy coating. They are sessile insects. They are
phloem feeders and suck the sap from all plant parts and also transmit some
plant disease thus causing serious economic losses to economically important
crop plants. Many of the mealybugs are arboreal and some are subterranean
feeding on the roots. They are windblown, and the spreading of mealybugs is
facilitated by wind. Within 2 days of hatching, they are also covered by waxy
coating making them hard to get killed with chemicals. Hence they are called
as hard to kill insects.
Mealybugs mostly live in protected habitats. They are found in cracks,
crevices inside the fruit clusters, lower surface of the leaves, etc. Since they
live in concealed plant parts, the chemicals will not reach the target pests
making chemical control ineffective. Many a time, mealybugs become abun-
dant in the fruiting phase of the plants. Several applications of insecticides are
needed for mealybug control. Thus frequent application of insecticides for
mealybug control leads to residue problem on the fruits, making unt for
export and hazardous to domestic market.
This book covers all the basic and applied aspects of the mealybug species
ultimately useful to implement the integrated mealybug management in differ-
ent agricultural crops. The book covers the information on identication of the
mealybugs, morphology, cytogenetics, taxonomy, molecular characterization
for identication, biology, damage, mealybugs as vectors, seasonal develop-
ment, natural enemies, culturing of mealybugs, ant association, control mea-
sures, insecticide resistance and mealybug management in different crops.
This book on Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural and
Horticultural crops is rst of its kind since there is no comprehensive book
covering all aspects of mealybug available in the world. This will serve as a
guide for crop growers, state goverment ofcials and other stake holders
industry, besides researchers and students engaged in mealybug research and
development activities.

Indian Council of Agricultural Research N.K. Krishna Kumar


New Delhi 12, India,
July, 2014

vii
Preface

Mealybugs throughout the world cause a variety of economic problems. The


most obvious damage is caused by the sucking habits of these insects. Heavy
infestations often cause stunting or death to the plant host. At times, mealy-
bugs have toxins and act as vectors of certain viruses detrimental to plant life.
Information on morphology, cytogenetics, taxonomy, molecular charac-
terization for identication, morphology, biology, damage, mealybugs as vec-
tors, seasonal development, natural enemies, culturing of mealybugs, ant
association, control measures, insecticide resistance etc are covered in this
book. It also deals with the all the mealybug management practices, which
include monitoring of mealybugs, use of pheromones, cultural practices,
chemical control and biological suppression available in the world.
We tried to accommodate almost all the important information generated
on the mealybugs up to 2014. A complete list of mealybug occurring in dif-
ferent crop growing regions of the world is also covered in this book, which
will be ready reckoner for the crops. We sincerely hope that this book will
provide useful information to many entomologists and students working on
mealybugs. It is a pleasure to thank all those people who gave help, sugges-
tions and encouragement in the preparation of our book Mealybugs and their
Management in Agricultural and Horticultural crops.

Bangalore, Karnataka, India M. Mani


C. Shivaraju

ix
Acknowledgements

The beatitude and euphoria that accompanies successful completion of any


task would be incomplete without the expression of appreciation of simple
certitude to the people who made it possible to achieve the goal by their
encouragement and support. We heartily thank Dr. N. K. Krishnakumar,
Deputy Director General of Horticulture, Indian Council of Agricultural
Research, New Delhi, for his technical guidance. We are immensely grateful
to Dr. Amrik Singh Sidhu, Director, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore, for his genuine guidance, impeccable and scholarly advice, recur-
ring encouragement, sustained interest and above all his affectionate way of
dealing with things throughout the course of writing the book. We wish to
express our extreme and profound sense of gratitude to Dr. Ameriksingh
Siddu, Director, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore.
Karnataka, India, for his valuable suggestions and useful guidance. We take
this opportunity to convey our sincere thanks to Dr. Abraham Verghese,
Director, National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Insects Resource,
Bangalore, for the encouragement to write this book.

xi
Contents

1 Introduction ................................................................................... 1
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Part I Mealybugs

2 Morphology ................................................................................... 7
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju
3 Cytogenetics ................................................................................... 19
Ramakrishna Sompalaym, Kokilamani A. Lingarajaiah,
Raju G. Narayanappa, Jayaprakash,
and Venkatachalaiah Govindaiah
4 Taxonomy ....................................................................................... 55
M. Mani
5 Molecular Identification of Mealybugs ....................................... 75
K.B. Rebijith, R. Asokan, and N.K. Krishna Kumar
6 Biology............................................................................................ 87
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju
7 Culturing of Mealybugs ................................................................ 107
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju
8 Mode of Spread of Mealybugs ..................................................... 113
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju
9 Damage........................................................................................... 117
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju
10 Mealybugs as Vectors .................................................................... 123
R. Selvarajan, V. Balasubramanian, and B. Padmanaban
11 Economic Importance................................................................... 131
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju
12 Ecology ........................................................................................... 141
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju
13 Natural Enemies of Mealybugs .................................................... 149
A.N. Shylesha and M. Mani

xiii
xiv Contents

14 Semiochemicals in Mealybugs...................................................... 173


N. Bakthavatsalam
15 Ant Association .............................................................................. 199
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju
16 Methods of Control ....................................................................... 209
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju
17 Insecticide Resistance and Its Management in Mealybugs ....... 223
T. Venkatesan, S.K. Jalali, S.L. Ramya, and M. Prathibha
18 Mealybug Alikes ............................................................................ 231
M. Mani and Shaheen Gul

Part II Management of Mealybugs in Agricultural


and Horticultural Crops

19 Rice ................................................................................................. 239


Gururaj Katti
20 Wheat ............................................................................................. 247
Srinivasa Babu Kurra, Jeyakumar Ponnuraj,
and Shyam Prasad Gogineni
21 Barley ............................................................................................. 249
M. Mani
22 Groundnut ..................................................................................... 251
G. Harish and M.V. Nataraja
23 Sunflower ....................................................................................... 257
K.S. Jagadish, Chandrashekar, H. Basappa,
G. Basana Gowda, and Y.G. Shadakshari
24 Pulses .............................................................................................. 263
S.K. Singh, S.D. Mohapatra, and P. Duraimurugan
25 Soybean .......................................................................................... 267
M. Mani
26 Cotton ............................................................................................. 271
V.S. Nagrare, S. Kranthi, Rishi Kumar, B. Dharajothi,
M. Amutha, and K.R. Kranthi
27 Jute and Allied Fibre Crops ......................................................... 283
M. Mani and S. Satpathy
28 Sugarcane....................................................................................... 287
R. Jayanthi, J. Srikanth, and S.N. Sushil
29 Fruit Crops: Apple ........................................................................ 297
M. Mani
30 Fruit Crops: Pears ........................................................................ 303
M. Mani
Contents xv

31 Fruit Crops: Plum ......................................................................... 307


M. Mani
32 Fruit Crops: Peaches .................................................................... 311
M. Mani
33 Fruit Crops: Persimmon .............................................................. 313
M. Mani
34 Fruit Crops: Passion Fruit ........................................................... 317
M. Mani
35 Fruit Crops: Apricot ..................................................................... 319
M. Mani
36 Fruit Crops: Pistachio and Almond ............................................ 321
M. Mani
37 Fruit Crops: Strawberry .............................................................. 327
M. Mani
38 Fruit Crops: Grapevine ................................................................ 329
M. Mani and U. Amala
39 Fruit Crops: Citrus ....................................................................... 353
C.N. Rao, V.J. Shivankar, K.J. David, M. Mani,
and A. Krishnamoorthy
40 Fruit Crops: Guava ....................................................................... 377
M. Mani
41 Fruit Crops: Mango ...................................................................... 385
M. Mani
42 Fruit Crops: Papaya ..................................................................... 395
M. Mani, M. Kalyanasundaram and C. Shivaraju
43 Fruit Crops: Pineapple ................................................................. 411
M. Mani
44 Fruit Crops: Avocado .................................................................... 419
M. Mani
45 Fruit Crops: Banana ..................................................................... 423
B. Padmanaban and M.M. Mustaffa
46 Fruit Crops: Sapota ...................................................................... 429
M. Mani
47 Fruit Crops: Pomegranate ........................................................... 433
M. Mani
48 Fruit Crops: Ber ............................................................................ 439
M. Mani
xvi Contents

49 Fruit Crops: Custard Apple ......................................................... 443


M. Mani
50 Fruit Crops: Phalsa....................................................................... 447
M. Mani
51 Fruit Crops: Litchi ........................................................................ 449
M. Mani
52 Fruit Crops: Jackfruit .................................................................. 451
M. Mani
53 Vegetable Crops ............................................................................. 455
A. Krishnamoorthy and M. Mani
54 Tuber Crops ................................................................................... 471
M. Mani, M. Kalyanasundaram, C.A. Jayaprakas,
E.R. Harish, R.S. Sreerag, and M. Nedunchezhiyan
55 Ornamental Plants ........................................................................ 495
V. Sridhar, L.S. Vinesh, and M. Mani
56 Orchids ........................................................................................... 525
N.K. Meena, R.P. Medhi, and M. Mani
57 Medicinal Plants ............................................................................ 535
V. Sridhar, L.S. Vinesh, and M. Mani
58 Plantation Crops ........................................................................... 543
Chandrika Mohan, P. Rajan, and A. Josephrajkumar
59 Rubber ........................................................................................... 557
Mani Chellappan
60 Cashew ........................................................................................... 561
V. Ambethgar
61 Oil Palm ......................................................................................... 569
P. Kalidas
62 Spices .............................................................................................. 573
S. Devasahayam and T.K. Jacob
63 Mulberry ........................................................................................ 579
J.B. Narendra Kumar, M.A. Shekhar, and Vinod Kumar
64 Tobacco .......................................................................................... 589
M. Mani and G.N. Rao
65 Jatropha ......................................................................................... 591
M. Mani
Contents xvii

66 Forage Crops and Grasses ........................................................... 595


Narendra S. Kulkarni and M. Mani
67 Forest Plants .................................................................................. 607
R. Sundararaj and M. Mani
68 Glasshouse, Greenhouse and Polyhouse Crops .......................... 621
K. Gopalakrishna Pillai
69 Root Mealybugs ............................................................................. 629
Maicykutty Mathew and M. Mani
70 Coffee ............................................................................................. 643
P.K. Vinod Kumar, G.V. Manjunath Reddy, H.G. Seetharama,
and M.M. Balakrishnan
List of Tables

Table 4.1 List of mealybug species with eld-identifying


characters with their respective images .............................. 59
Table 4.2 List of mealybug species, correct identity of which
led to a successful biological control. ................................ 72
Table 5.1 Primers employed in DNA barcoding of mealybugs ......... 80
Table 5.2 Maximum composite likelihood estimate
of the pattern of nucleotide substitution from
29 species of mealybugs..................................................... 81
Table 10.1 Mealybug transmitted plant viruses ................................... 127
Table 13.1 List of predators recorded on the mealybugs ..................... 154
Table 13.2 List of some important encyrtid parasitoids
of mealybugs ...................................................................... 166
Table 13.3 List of entomopathogens and entomopathogenic
nematodes recorded on mealybugs .................................... 168
Table 14.1 Pheromone compounds identied from different
species of mealybugs.......................................................... 178
Table 19.1 List of mealybug species recorded on rice
in different regions of the world ......................................... 240
Table 20.1 List of mealybugs recorded on wheat ................................ 248
Table 22.1 List of mealybugs reported on groundnut
in different countries .......................................................... 252
Table 24.1 List of mealybugs recorded on pigeon pea......................... 264
Table 25.1 List of mealybugs recorded on soybean ............................. 268
Table 26.1 Mealybug species recorded on cotton in different
regions of the world............................................................ 272
Table 27.1 List of mealybugs recorded on Kapok
in different countries .......................................................... 284
Table 28.1 List of mealybugs recorded on sugarcane
in different regions of the world ......................................... 288

xix
xx List of Tables

Table 29.1 List of mealybug species infecting apple


in different regions of the world ......................................... 298
Table 30.1 List of mealybugs recorded on pears
in different countries .......................................................... 304
Table 38.1 Mealybug species recorded on grapevine
in different regions of the world ......................................... 330
Table 38.2 List of insecticides recommended to control
mealybugs .......................................................................... 340
Table 39.1 List of mealybug species recorded on citrus
in different regions of the world ......................................... 354
Table 40.1 List of mealybugs recorded on guava
in different countries .......................................................... 378
Table 41.1 List of mealybugs recorded on mango
in different countries .......................................................... 386
Table 42.1 List of mealybugs recorded on papaya
in different regions of the world ......................................... 396
Table 42.2 List of natural enemies on Paracoccus
marginatus .......................................................................... 400
Table 43.1 List of mealybugs recorded in pine apple
in different countries .......................................................... 412
Table 45.1 List of mealybugs recorded on banana
in different countries .......................................................... 424
Table 46.1 List of mealybugs recorded on sapota
in different countries .......................................................... 430
Table 47.1 List of mealybugs recorded on pomegranate
in different regions of the world ......................................... 434
Table 48.1 List of mealybugs recorded on ber
in different countries .......................................................... 440
Table 49.1 List of mealybugs recorded on custard apple
in different countries .......................................................... 444
Table 51.1 List of mealybugs recorded on Litchi
in different countries .......................................................... 449
Table 52.1 List of mealybugs recorded on Jackfruit
in different regions ............................................................. 452
Table 52.2 Nipaecoccus viridis and its natural enemies
on Jack fruit ........................................................................ 452
Table 53.1 List of mealybugs recorded on tomato
in different countries .......................................................... 456
List of Tables xxi

Table 53.2 List of mealybugs recorded on eggplant ............................ 458


Table 53.3 List of mealybugs recorded on okra in
different countries .............................................................. 461
Table 53.4 List of mealybug occurring on different
vegetable crops ................................................................... 464
Table 54.1 List of mealybug species reported on cassava
in different regions ............................................................. 472
Table 54.2 List of natural enemies recorded on P. manihoti,
F.virgata, and Ph.solenopsis infesting cassava................... 476
Table 54.3 List of mealybugs recorded on tuber crops
other than cassava............................................................... 487
Table 55.1 List of some mealybugs recorded on different
ornamental plants ............................................................... 496
Table 56.1 List of mealybugs reported on orchids
in different regions ............................................................. 526
Table 57.1 Various medicinal and aromatic plants infested
with different mealybugs .................................................... 538
Table 58.1 Mealybugs recorded on Palms ........................................... 544
Table 58.2 List of mealybugs recorded on cocoa
in different countries .......................................................... 550
Table 58.3 List of mealybugs recorded on tea ..................................... 554
Table 59.1 List of mealybugs recorded on rubber
in different countries .......................................................... 558
Table 60.1 List of mealybugs recorded on cashew
in different countries .......................................................... 562
Table 61.1 List of mealybugs recorded on oil palm
in different countries .......................................................... 570
Table 62.1 List of mealybug species recorded on
different spice crops ........................................................... 574
Table 63.1 List of mealybug species recorded on mulberry
in different regions in the world ......................................... 580
Table 64.1 List of mealybugs recorded on tobacco.............................. 590
Table 66.1 List of mealybugs attacking the grasses
and fodder crops ................................................................. 596
Table 67.1 List of mealybug species infesting
different forest plants ......................................................... 614
Table 69.1 List of other root mealybugs on different
host plants in different countries ........................................ 630
Table 70.1 List of mealybugs recorded on coffee from
different countries .............................................................. 644
About the Editors

Dr. M. Mani is an agricultural scientist with over


35 years of R&D experience in the entomological
research. He has served in Indian Council of
Agricultural Research and Tamil Nadu Agricultural
University. His focal subject is pest control in hor-
ticultural crops including grapes. He has done work
on mealybugs for 35 years. Currently, he is an
Emeritus Professor of ICAR, New Delhi. He got
seven awards including lifetime achievement for
his contribution to the research in horticulture ento-
mology. He is associated with ve scientic bodies.
The author has published two books in 2013: (1) A Wonder Predator
(Cryptolaemus) by Lap Lambert Academic Publishing Company, Germany
(2) The Grape Entomology by Springer.

Dr. C. Shivaraju has worked extensively on insects


infesting several agricultural and horticultural
crops in Indian Institute of Horticultural Research
and National Bureau of Agriculturally Important
Insects both located at Bangalore. Particularly, he
contributed signicantly in research on eucalyptus
and papaya pest management. He has co-authored
two books: A Wonder Predator (Cryptolaemus) and
The Grape Entomology.

xxiii
Introduction
1
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Mealybugs belong to the insect group that is fungus called sooty due to which a signicant
commonly known as scale insects; They have infestation of mealybug creates a black, sticky
soft segmented oval bodies, but without an outer mess. Most of the economically important mealy-
shell. Mealybugs (Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha, bug species are known to be associated with
Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae, and Putoidae) are long lists of host plants, and the development of
small, soft-bodied plant sap-sucking insects. The high population density, which eventually would
name mealybug is descriptive of the insects kill the host plant. Plant growth conditions may
body, which is covered by a white sticky powder strongly affect the development of the mealybug.
resembling cornmeal. Their common name is Flowering and fruiting phases of plant support
derived from the mealy wax secretion that usu- heavy mealybug population. Likewise, hot
ally covers their bodies (Kosztarab and Kozr weather favors rapid multiplication resulting in
1988). Because of their appearance, mealybugs the outbreak of mealybug population.
are often confused for cushionscale insects or Many of the mealybugs show sexual dimor-
woolyaphids. Unlike their close relative scale phism but parthenogenetic mode of reproduction
insects, mealybugs retain their legs throughout is also observed in some species of mealybugs.
their lives. Mealybugs may be oviparous or viviparous or
Mealybugs feed on a variety of herbaceous ovoviparous. The eggs are usually laid in loose
and woody plants, including the angiosperm, masses of cottony wax or felt-like ovisacs. Some
gymnosperm, and fern families. Most of the species bear living young. Only newly hatched
mealybugs are arboreal and some are subterra- mealybugs, also called as crawlers, are not cov-
nean feeding on the roots. They are phloem feed- ered with wax coating, moving from one part to
ers and suck the sap from all plant parts and also another within the plant and also between plants;
transmit some plant disease, thus causing serious this is the most vulnerable stage for chemical
economic losses to economically important crop control. They are windblown, and the spreading
plants. Mealybugs take in great quantities of plant of mealybugs is facilitated by wind. Within two
uids and therefore excrete a lot of liquid waste days, they are also covered by waxy coating,
called honey that supports the growth of a black making them hard to get killed with chemicals.
There are three nymphal instars in female and
four in male mealybugs also covered with wax.
M. Mani (*) C. Shivaraju
Adult male and female mealybugs are completely
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India different from each other. Adult female mealy-
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in bugs are characteristically elongate, oval, soft,

Springer India 2016 1


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_1
2 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

and with distinct segmentation measuring as some chemicals to be unsustainable. Furthermore,


much as 89 mm in length. They are wingless many of these products are increasingly unac-
and their mouthparts are thread-like, inserting ceptable because of their human toxicity and low
through the plant tissue to suck juices from the selectivity; some are no longer available and oth-
host, thereby causing damage. The adult male ers are targeted for reduction under national pro-
has a pair of long opaque wings, slender body, grams and regulations for sustainable use of
and two multisegmented antennae that are about pesticides, in light of their risk or hazard assess-
half the body length and a pair of halters with ments (Charles et al. 2006; Franco et al. 2004;
hooks. It bears two white, long anal laments. Walton et al. 2006). Since they live in concealed
Adult males are about 1.5 mm in length. They are plant parts, the chemicals will not reach the target
active iers but have abortive mouthparts and pests, often making chemical control ineffective.
take no food. Their role in life is to y and nd a Many a time, mealybugs become abundant in the
female to mate. Females release a pheromone to fruiting phase of the plant. Multiple applications
attract the winged males. Females are abundant of insecticides are needed for their control. Thus,
in elds while male mealybugs are so rarely frequent application of insecticides for mealybug
available. They reproduce sexually and partheno- control leads to residue problem on the fruits
genetically. The males, seldom seen, are delicate. making them unt for export and hazardous to
Outwardly, mealybug species look similar. domestic market.
However, each species has distinct biological However, mealybugs have a very rich natural
and morphological characters. Identication enemy complex. Biological control of mealybugs
of mealybugs is based upon adult females. is widely recommended. It includes several gen-
They constitute the second largest family of eral predators like coccinellids, chrysopids,
Coccoidea, with more than 2000 described lycaenids, drosophilids, and cecidomyiids.
species and ca. 290 genera (Ben-Dov 2006; Mealybugs are known to be attacked by several
Downie and Gullan 2005). parasitoids, mainly the encyrtids and some other
Economic losses resulting from mealybug parasitoids like aphlelinids, platgasterids, braco-
infestations have increased over a period of years. nids, pteromalids, eulopids, eucilids, and sig-
In response, there has been a cosmopolitan effort niphorids. Many are host specic and very
to improve control strategies and better under- effective against mealybugs. In the case of undis-
stand mealybug biology and ecology as well as turbed or uninterrupted broad-spectrum and del-
their role as vectors of plant pathogens (Daane eterious chemicals, the local natural enemies play
et al. 2012). an important role in the population regulation of
For the most part in their life stages, mealy- mealybugs. Many a time, the local natural ene-
bugs are covered with waxy coating, including mies appear a little late when mealybug popula-
eggs, making the control with chemicals difcult. tion reaches very high numbers. Some local
Mealybugs mostly live in protected habitats. natural enemies have their own limitations like
They are found in cracks, crevices inside the fruit hyperparasitism or reach a biotic balance.
clusters, lower surface of the leaves, etc. Hence Addition of these local natural enemies to the
they are called as hard to kill insects. crop ecosystem may not enhance the natural par-
Chemical control is still the most common asitism or predation to bring down the mealybug
control tactic used against mealybug pests. population effectively. Exotic natural parasitoids/
However, the cryptic behavior of mealybugs, predators from other countries help extensively
their typical waxy body cover, and clumped spa- to suppress mealybugs sometimes completely. It
tial distribution pattern render the use of many is proved in the case of several mealybugs, par-
insecticides ineffective. Repeated insecticide use, ticularly alien mealybugs. For the biological con-
especially of broad-spectrum chemicals, also trol, a thorough knowledge on mealybugs is
adversely impacts mealybugs natural enemies. highly essential, and identication up to species
Insecticide resistance has also caused the use of is mandatory.
1 Introduction 3

Only very few books are available on Ben-Dov Y (2006) Scales in a family/genus query.
Family pseudococcidae & genus. Available at http://
mealybugs: Mealybugs of California by
www.sel.barc.usda.gov/calecgi/chklist.exe? Accessed
McKenzie (1967), Australian Mealybugs by 14 Aug 2008
Williams (1985), Mealybugs of Central and Charles JG, Cohen D, Walker JTS, Forgie SA, Bell VA,
South America by Williams and Granara de Breen KC (2006) A review of grapevine leafroll asso-
ciated virus type 3 (GLRaV-3) for the New Zealand
Willink (1992), A Systematic Catalogue of the
wine industry. The Horticulture and Food Research
Mealybugs of the World (Insecta, Homoptera, Institute of New Zealand Ltd, Auckland
Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae and Putoidae): With Daane KM, Almeida RPP, Bell VA, Walker JTS,
Data on Geographical Distribution, Host Plants, Botton M, Fallahzadesh M, Mani M, Miano JL,
Sforza R, Walton VM, Zaveizo T (2012) Biology
Biology and Economic Importance by Ben-Dov
and management of mealybugs in vineyards. In:
(1994), and Mealybugs of Southern Asia by Bostman NJ et al (ed) Arthropod management in
Williams (2004). They deal mostly with the taxo- vineyard pests, approaches, and future directions.
nomical aspects of mealybugs in different Springer Science + Media B.V., pp 271307. doi:
10.1007/978-007-4032-7-12
regions. Efforts have been made to present infor-
Downie DA, Gullan PJ (2005) Phylogenetic congruence
mation comprehensively about all basic aspects of mealybugs and their primary endosymbionts. J Evol
of mealybugs and also management tactics Biol 18:315324
known for mealybug species affecting different Franco JC, Suma P, da Silva EB, Blumberg D, Mendel Z
(2004) Management strategies of mealybug pests of
crop plants in different countries. Section I of the
citrus in Mediterranean countries. Phytoparasitica
book presents a generalized description of mor- 32:507522
phology, cytogenetics, taxonomy, molecular Kosztarab M, Kozr F (1988) Scale insects of Central
characterization, biology, damage, ecology, natu- Europe. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht
McKenzie HL (1967) Mealybugs of California. University
ral enemies, ant association, control measures,
of California Press, Berkeley, 525 p
insecticide resistance, pheromones, etc. Section Walton VM, Daane KM, Bentley WJ, Millar JG, Larsen
II deals with management practices of mealybugs TE, Malakar-Kuenen R (2006) Pheromone-based mat-
in different crops. ing disruption of Planococcus cus (Hemiptera:
Pseudococcidae) in California vineyards. J Econ
Entomol 99:12801290
Williams DJ (1985) Australian mealybugs. British
References Museum (Natural History), London, 431 p
Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- Natural History Museum, Southdene Sdn. Bhd., Kaula
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Lumpur, 896 p
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- Williams DJ, Granara de Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic of Central and South America. CAB International,
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p Wallingford, 635 p
Part I
Mealybugs
Morphology
2
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Mealybugs are characterised by their bodies mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero


being covered with mealy or wax secretions. has sensory equipment on its antennae that can
They are elongate to oval in shape with distinct detect, by olfaction and contact, chemicals
segmentation (head, thorax and abdomen). released by the plant. Nine different types of sen-
Mealybugs are often characterised as having a silla have been identied on the antenna of the
white, mealy or powdery secretion covering both cassava mealybug. Antennae are remarkable in
dorsal and ventral surfaces of their body. Species Allomyrmococcus Takahashi and other genera of
that occur in concealed habitats such as leaf the tribe Allomyrmococcini, in which they are
sheaths of grasses either lack this secretion or often as long as the body and densely covered in
have only small amounts of it. Marginal areas of slender setae.
their body have a series of protruding lateral wax
laments. These laments may be absent, con- Eyes In certain Pseudococcus species, there are
ned to the posterior one or two abdominal seg- tiny loculi or discoidal pores associated with the
ments, or occur around the entire body margin. A eyes, and these structures appear to have some
lamentous secretion often is produced that taxonomic signicance.
encloses the eggs and at least part of the body.
General morphology of the mealybugs is based Mouthparts The rostrum or beak is a cone-
on common species, and morphological charac- shaped structure that lies approximately between,
ters vary slightly from species to species in and slightly anterior to, the front coxae. As a gen-
mealybugs (McKenzie 1967; Williams 2004). eral rule, the rostrum is approximately one-third
longer than broad, although in some species it is
almost as broad as long. The anterior sclerotised
2.1 Head portion of the mouthpart is the clypeus, including
the internal framework of the tentorium, mandi-
Antennae Antennae are well developed in bles and maxillae bases. The clypeus varies in
adults, normally with ve to nine segments, shape from species to species and may, at times,
except in a few forms where they are reduced to be on taxonomic signicance. The labium
mere two-segmented tubercles. The cassava appears to be three segmented. The basal seg-
ment is quite small and inconspicuous, compris-
M. Mani (*) C. Shivaraju ing a small, sclerotised piece at each side, which
Indian institute of Horticultural Research, constitutes the cone. In mealybugs, there are
Bangalore 560089, India three segments clearly visible on the anterior
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 7


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_2
8 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

surface of labium. The basal segment usually may be long or short. If they are long, they may
possesses three pairs of setae. At the tip of the extend to or slightly beyond the tip of the claws
apical segment, there is a pair of minute setae that and may be either knobbed or setose at the api-
are usually stiff and spine-like, but because of ces. Digitules less than half the claw length are
their small size they are not shown in the accom- usually setose.
panying illustrations. Immediately anterior to
these apical setae on the anterior surface there are Translucent Dots or Pores They occur on the
usually four pairs of subapical setae. On the hind femur and tibia of quite a few mealybugs.
remainder of the medial and apical segments
there are varying numbers of setae, which reach Clypeolabral Shield In some species, an anterior
their greatest numbers in members of the tribe extension to the clypeolabral shield is present.
Allomyrmococcini associated with herdsmen
ants. There are only two pairs of anterior setae on
the posterior surface of the apical segment in sub- 2.3 Abdomen
family Pseudococcinae, whereas there are three
such pairs of setae in the subfamilies Trabutininae, Dorsal Ostioles The most characteristic feature
Rhizoecinae and Sphaerococcinae. One pair of of the family Pseudococcidae is the occurrence of
the subapical setae is grooved on the labium of two pairs of slit-like openings on the body dor-
Phenacoccus manihoti. sum, here designated as dorsal ostioles. The pos-
terior pair lies within the boundaries of the
seventh abdominal segment, and the anterior pair
appears to belong to the foremost part of the pro-
2.2 Thorax thorax. The edges of the ostioles are invaginated
to form anterior and posterior lips, and these are
Spiracles The spiracles in the Pseudococcidae usually beset with setae and trilocular pores.
are represented by two thoracic pairs only. The When a living mealybug is disturbed or irritated,
anterior pair of spiracles is located in the inter- a globule of liquid is often discharged from one
segmental membrane between the prothorax and or more of these ostioles.
the mesothorax. In the same manner, the poste-
rior pair of spiracles indicates the border between
the mesothorax and the metathorax. In a few spe- Cerarii These structures number at most 18
cies of Antonina and certain other grass-infesting basic pairs. A cerarius is often composed of two
forms, the spiracles are noticeably enlarged, or more conical to lanceolate setae and a compact
sclerotised and often have a conspicuous crescent group of trilocular pores. Each cerarius produces
of crowded trilocular-type pores situated around a lateral wax lament when viewed alive. The
the lateral margin of the atrium. Usually, how- number of cerarii may vary even between species
ever, the spiracles are essentially the same size in the same genus or cerarii may be absent
and shape throughout the family. entirely. Sometimes a cerarius may consist of
only a single conical seta or there may be multi-
Legs A principal leg character was considered ple conical setae. In some species, there are addi-
to be the presence or absence of a denticle or tional, intermediate cerarii present and the cerarii
tooth on the plantar surface of the claw. This may appear to form a continuous row, when it is
tooth has, at its very highest development, a quite difcult to determine the number of basic pairs.
insignicant character, yet it correlates very Usually in the second and third instars, the cerarii
closely with other characters, which in their total- are more clearly dened so that the total number
ity dene the genera that may be referred to as the can be veried. In some cerarii, the conical setae
Phenacoccus series. The claws bear two apically may be replaced by agellate setae surrounded
spatulate or setose digitules that arise, one on by trilocular pores, or a cerarius may contain one
each side, from near the claw bases. The digitules conical seta and one agellate seta. It has been a
2 Morphology 9

Generalised and semidiagramatic drawing representing morphological structure of mealybugs (Courtesy: Williams DJ)
10 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

custom to refer to the rst three cerarii on the Circulus The circulus when present consists of
head as the frontal, preocular and ocular cerarii. a simple, sclerotised ring enclosing an area of
They are numbered from the anterior end down- variable size. It may be situated on the venter in
wards, as are all body characters. Each of the full the intersegmental fold between the fourth and
complement of cerarii is numbered as C118, with fth abdominal segments, or on the fourth
C1118 occurring on abdominal segments I abdominal segment above. It encloses an area
VIII. The segmentation on the thorax is some- which is free from pores and setae.
times not clearly dened but by tracing the lateral
ends of the intersegmental lines when possible, it Pores and Ducts Several different types of pores
seems that there are two cerarii present on each and ducts on the body may be recognised in the
thoracic segment (C510) and four on the head Pseudococcidae, which include bitubular and trit-
(C14). There are many species with 17 pairs of ubular (sometimes called bi- or tritubular cera res),
cerarii, when C2 (the preocular pair) is missing. trilocular, minute circular (sometimes called sim-
When only a single pair of cerarius is present, it ple disc pores), multilocular (sometimes called
is located on the anal lobes only (C18). Some spe- discoid or genacerores) and quinquelocular types.
cies possess additional, dorsal cerarii.
Trilocular Pores or Swirled Pores They are
Anal Ring The anal ring (anal opening) in the usually present in species of the family
Pseudococcidae is situated on what is here inter- Pseudococcidae. Occasionally, they are larger on
preted as the tenth abdominal segment. The anal the dorsum than on the venter and in some spe-
ring usually lies on the dorsal side of the body situ- cies of Rastrococcus, those in and near the cerarii
ated close to the posterior apex of the abdomen. In are different in shape and size to others elsewhere
some cases, it may be displaced anteriorly on the on the body. Some trilocular pores in Antonina
dorsum and lie some little distance from the poste- and Chaetococcus are as deep as they are wide.
rior apex of the abdomen, and in rare instances it
may be displaced posteriorly to the venter. The Discoidal Pores These are usually minute, sim-
anal opening is usually surrounded by a more or ple, circular pores present in varying numbers over
less sclerotised ring that normally bears six or the dorsum and venter. In some species of
more slender setae. In this sclerotised band in most Dysmicoccus, the discoidal pores have a granular
members of Pseudococcidae appears numerous surface. The rim of each pore may be thin or con-
irregular pores. In a few instances, the ring is much spicuously wide and heavily sclerotised. In the
reduced, the sclerotization is slight and the pores genus Stricklandina, there are normal minute
are absent. pores present and others with thick sclerotised
rims and a granular or tessellated surface.
Anal Lobes The anal lobes are situated on the Occasionally, discoidal pores are oval, as in some
more or less protruding posterior areas of the species of Eurycoccus. In Hordeolicoccus, some
ninth abdominal segment. On the ventral surface, species possess remarkably large discoidal pores,
they possess at the apex usually the longest body each about the same size as a multilocular disc
seta, here designated as anal lobe seta. On the pore. An unusual type of discoidal pore is described
dorsal surface of each anal lobe is a cerarius, herein for some species of Exallomochlus, in
probably more prominent than others along the which the centre of the pore is extended.
body margin because of more trilocular pores,
slender auxiliary setae, two to several stout coni- Tubular Ducts There are many variations in the
cal setae and often a sclerotised dorsal surface. tubular ducts. The presence or absence of oral
rim ducts is sometimes difcult to decide
Vulva The presence of vulva is an indication of because, although the rim may be present, it may
full maturity of the adult female. It is important as not be elevated from the surface of the derm, as in
a landmark to indicate the exact position on the Leptococcus species. Sometimes, oral collar
venter of the anterior margin of the ninth and pos- tubular ducts possess indistinct rims, which are
terior margin of the eighth abdominal segments. discussed in this chapter.
2 Morphology 11

Microducts Structures that appear as minute present with two conical setae in the abdominal
dots on the surface of the cuticle are actually segment IX. Normally, one trilocular disc pore is
microducts. They may be common throughout present in the cerarian zone of each segment.
the Pseudococcidae. Head: Six jointed antennae, average measure-
ments of the segments in are I, 22; II, 21; III,
Ostioles Normally, they are present as two pairs 17; IV, 16; V, 16; VI, 55. Eye is about 15 in
and lie submedially on the dorsum but in the diameter at the base and 7 high. Beak is conical,
Allomyrmococcini they are situated on the lateral on an average 62 long and 40 wide at the
margins, when the sclerotised lips are base. Thorax: Average measurements of posterior
prominent. leg (in ) are as follows: trochanter, 30 19;
femur, 68 27; tibia, 55 18; tarsus, 65 15;
Body Setae Most pseudococcids have at least a claw, 16; tarsal digitule, 23; claw digitule, 15.
few small dorsal setae, and some are quite setose. Both anterior and posterior spiracles are about 6
In certain species the setae are very slender, while in diameter at atrium and about 15 long.
in others they may be stout and conical or lanceo- Abdomen: Anal ring is situated in between two
late, often the same size as that in the cerarii. anal lobes, 26 in diameter; anal ring setae are 44
Rarely the stout setae may be truncated apically, long on an average. Apical setae are 135 long
and at times they may be borne upon a sclerotised on an average. Anal lobe bar is weakly sclero-
process. The setae on the venter are usually slen- tised. Dermal structures: Only one trilocular disc
der, and normally are situated in transverse rows pore is present in each lip of both the anterior and
on the abdominal segments, in a group anterior to the posterior pairs of ostioles. Trilocular disc
the clypeus, and on areas designated as sternal in pores, about 3 , are present in transverse rows on
the thoracic segments. Infrequently the setae are
of taxonomic value at the species level.

Bitubular Cerores and Tritubular


Cerores They are structures peculiar to the sub-
family Rhizoecinae, and in southern Asia they are
present in the genera Rhizoecus and Geococcus.

2.4 Morphology of Various


Instars of Both Sexes
of the Mealybug

Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) is taken as


model for detailed descriptions of the nymphs
and adults of both sexes. Seven types of glandular
structure are described, and their roles, mainly in
the production of waxy secretions, are discussed
(Ghose 1971).

2.4.1 First-Instar Nymph


Fig. 2.1 First-instar nymph of M. hirsutus. E eye, AS
At this stage, the male and the female cannot be anterior spiracle, B beak, TDP trilocular disc pore, PS
posterior spiracle, TD tarsal digitule, CD claw digitule,
distinguished. They are elongate to oval, on an
ALB anal lobe bar, APS apical seta, AO anterior ostiole,
average 390 long and 180 wide; anal lobes are PO posterior ostiole, AR anal ring, ARS anal ring seta
prominent (Fig. 2.1). Only one pair of cerarii is (Courtesy: Ghose SK)
12 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

both dorsum and venter, but more in the former.


Their approximate numbers are dorsal abdominal
segments IX, 4; VIII, 4; VII, 8; VI, 6; V,5; IV, 7;
III, 6; II, 6, metathorax, 10; mesothorax, II; pro-
thorax, 14; head, 10; and ventral abdominal seg-
ments IX, 0; 2 in each of the segments VIII, VII,
VI, V, IV and III; II, 4; metathorax, 5; mesotho-
rax, 4; prothorax, 2; head, 4. The rst instar
nymph differs from other nymphal instars with
the absence of tubular ducts.

2.4.2 Second-Instar Female Nymph

Body is oval with anterior end slightly broader


and rounded; anal lobes are prominent, on an
average 620 long and 360 wide (Fig. 2.2).
Four pairs of cerarii with two conical setae on the Fig. 2.2 Second-instar female nymph of M. hirsutus.
abdominal segments VIIX are present. The cer- CIR circulus, ORD oral rim duct
arian setae of the other abdominal segments are
elongated and slender. Usually, two ducts of oral
rim type and three trilocular disc pores in each mesothorax, 35; prothorax, 40; head, 20; and
cerarian zone of segments IX and VIII and two ventral abdominal segments IX, 4; VIII, 2; VII,
disc pores in the ceracian zone of all other 4; VI, 6; V, 4; IV, 6; Ill, 4; II, 5; metathorax, 9;
abdominal segments are present. Head: Six mesothorax, 14; prothorax, 15; head, 5. Tubular
jointed antennae, average measurements in are ducts of oral rim type about 8 long and 5 wide
I, 35; II, 23; III, 33; IV, 21; V, 21; VI, 62. Eye are present on dorsum. Their numbers are abdom-
about 21 in diameter at the base and 9 high. inal segments IX, 2; VIII, 2; VII, 0; VI, 3; V, 4:
Beak is conical, on an average 83 long and 52 IV, 4; III, 5; II, 4; metathorax, 6; mesothorax, 7;
wide at the base. Thorax: Average measurements prothorax, 10; head, 3. Only one duct is present
of posterior leg in are trochanter, 42 24; in the venter of abdominal segment VIII.
femur, 85 35; tibia, 70 23; tarsus, 70 l8;
claw, 21; tarsal digitule, 34; claw digitule, 19.
Anterior spiracle is about 29 long and 10 2.4.3 Third-Instar Female Nymph
wide at atrium; posterior one is about 32 long
and 10 at atrium. Abdomen: Anal ring 41 in Body is oval with anterior end slightly broader
diameter; anal ring setae 64 long on an average. and rounded; anal lobes are prominent, on an
Apical setae 173 long on an average. A moder- average 1.095 mm long and 0.678 mm wide. Five
ately sclerotised bar is present in each anal lobe. pairs of cerarii are present on the last ve abdom-
Circulus is present. Dermal structures: Anterior inal segments, usually with two conical setae in
pair of ostioles with two trilocular disc pores and each. Anal lobe cerarii each with three trilocular
one seta on each lip; posterior ones each with disc pores and one oral rim duct and the remain-
three pores and one seta on the upper lip and two ing each cerarius with two disc pores and one
pores on the lower lip. Trilocular disc pores are oral rim duct are present. Head: Seven jointed
present on both dorsum and venter. Dorsal pores antennae, average measurements in are I, 45; II,
measure 4.04.4 and ventral ones 3.23.6 39; III, 31; IV, 26; V, 27; VI, 30; VII, 74. Eye is
wide. Their approximate numbers are dorsal about 25 in diameter at the base and 15 high.
abdominal segments IX, 6; VIII, 9; VII, 15; VI, Beak is conical, on an average 98 long and 52
II; V, 12: IV, 12; III, 10; II, 10; metathorax, 20; wide at the base. Thorax: Average measurements
2 Morphology 13

of posterior leg in are trochanter, 66 34; rax, 23; mesothorax, 36; prothorax, 42; head, 20;
femur, 127 53; tibia, 121 30; tarsus, 87 26; and ventral abdominal segments IX, 4; VIII, 11;
claw, 27; tarsal digitule, 36; claw digitule, 24. VII, 12; VI, 13; V, 10; IV, 10; III, 12; II, 12; meta-
Anterior spiracle is about 34 long and 13 thorax, 15; mesothorax, 28; prothorax, 24; head,
wide at atrium; posterior one is 36 long and 13 13. Tubular ducts of oral rim type are present
wide. Abdomen: Anal lobes are prominent; anal mostly on dorsum and a few on venter. Ducts on
ring on an average is 60 in diameter; anal ring dorsum are 9 long and 6 wide. Ventral ducts
setae are 84 long; apical setae is 209 long on are about 3/4 wide of those in dorsum. Their
an average. Anal lobe bar is moderately sclero- approximate numbers are dorsal abdominal seg-
tised. Dermal structures: Ostioles can be found ments IX, 6; VIII, 11; VII, 4; VI, 10; V, 11; IV, 14;
with a few trilocular disc pores. Anterior pair III, 14; II, 14; metathorax, 21; mesothorax, 27;
with three pores and one seta on each lip; poste- prothorax, 19; head, 7; and ventral abdominal seg-
rior ones with three to four pores and zero to one ments IX, 0; VIII, 2; VII, 2; VI, 2; V, 2; IV, 2; III,
seta on each lip. Dorsal setae are of two sizes, 3; II, 3; metathorax, 2; mesothorax, 6; prothorax,
longer and stout, and shorter and thin. Ventral 6; head, 4. Tubular ducts are of oral collar type,
body setae are longer and agellate. Circulus is 3.54.0 long and 1.5 wide, mostly distributed
about 33 long. Trilocular disc pores, 3.23.6 , in the marginal and submarginal areas of venter,
are present on both the surfaces of the body but rarely found on dorsum. Their approximate num-
more on dorsum. Their approximate numbers are bers in venter are abdominal segments IX, 0; VIII,
dorsal abdominal segments IX, 14; VIII, 15; VII, 2; VII, 4; VI, 5; V, 4; IV, 4; III, 4; II, 7; metathorax,
32; VI, 19; V, 18; IV, 19; III, 30; II, 30; metatho- 10; mesothorax, 8; prothorax, 4; head, 4.

Third-instar female nymph of M. hirsutus (Green). Adult female of M. hirsutus. MLDP multilocular disc
OCD oral collar duct, ORD oral rim duct pore, VUL vulva
(Courtesy: Ghose SK)
14 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

2.4.4 Adult Female former being predominant in the dorsum and the
latter in the venter. Oral rim ducts of dorsum are
Body is ovoid, slightly broader and rounded at larger than those of venter and more or less
the anterior end, on an average 1.7 mm long and arranged in transverse rows, about 9.5 long and
1.1 mm wide, attaining larger size (3.2 mm l.7 45 in diameter at the opening. Their approxi-
mm) with maturity. Anal lobes are prominent, mate numbers are abdominal segments IX, 12;
particularly in young adults. Six pairs of cerarii VIII, 20; VII, 10; VI, 22; V, 32; VI, 35; III, 34;
in the abdominal segments IVIX, usually with I1, 36; metathorax, 54; mesothorax, 62; protho-
two cerarian setae are present; occasionally a rax, 42; head, 18. A few rim ducts of venter are
third one is present in the cerarii of segments VIII found in the marginal and submarginal regions of
and IX. Segment IV has generally only one cerar- the body. Their numbers are abdominal segments
ian and one stout and longer setae on one side, IX, 2; VIII, 4; VII, 3; VI, 5; V, 5; IV, 7; III, 7; II,
the other cerarius has two normal cerarian setae. 6; rnetathorax, 4; mesothorax, 7; prothorax, 8;
Cerarii are without auxiliary setae except the anal head, 4. Oral collar ducts of venter are variable in
lobe pair. Each cerarius of segment IX has 56 size, 2.42.8 in diameter at opening and on an
trilobular disc pores and three oral rim ducts. average 10.5 long. The ducts of the dorsum are
Head: Antennae appear to be nine jointed generally smaller. These ducts are much more
because of a pseudo-articulation in the terminal numerous (six to seven times) in the adult than in
joint. Average measurements in are I, 54; II, 54; the third nymphal female. Multilocular disc
III, 52; IV, 34; V, 41; VI, 40; VII, 39; VIII, pores, 5 in diameter, are restricted to the sub-
37 + 56. Eye is about 32 wide at the base and 22 marginal and median regions of venter, mainly in
high. Beak is conical, on an average 141 long the abdominal segments VIIX.
and 86 wide at the base.
Thorax: Average measurements of posterior
leg in are trochanter, 97 36; femur, 217 68; 2.4.5 Second-Instar Male Nymph
tibia, 227 32; tarsus, 100 27; claw, 33; tarsal
digitule, 49; claw digitule, 31. Tarsal digitule, of Body is oval with anterior end slightly broader
the anterior legs are unequal, one is about 49 , and rounded; anal lobes are prominent. Average
whereas the other is about 42 . Anterior spiracle body size in the early stage is 625 long and 390
is about 51 long and 26 wide at atrium, and wide. It increases greatly and attains 970 438
posterior one 55 long and 29 wide. at the end of the feeding period. Normally, one
Abdomen: Anal ring on an average is 72 in pair of cerarii present are in the abdominal seg-
diameter; anal ring setae is 154 long; anal lobe ment IX; generally each with two and rarely stout
bar is moderately sclerotised; apical setae are 251 conical setae, one auxiliary seta, one microduct of
on an average. Dermal structures: Anterior pair oral collar type and one trilocular disc pore.
of ostioles with nine to ten trilocular disc pores Segment VIII is occasionally with one or two cer-
and one to three setae on each lip are present; arian setae in each. The cerarian setae of other
posterior one with 912 pores and 14 setae on segments are slender and elongated. Generally,
each lip. Body setae are of two sizes on both dor- two disc pores and one collar duct are present in
sal and ventral surfaces, the ventral ones being each cerarian zone of other segments. Head: Six
generally longer. Circulus is about 77 long. jointed antennae, but the joints cannot be recog-
Trilocular disc pores are more numerous and nised as and when the antennae of third-instar
larger on dorsum, about 4 , whereas those on male nymphs develop inside this instar. Average
venter measure about 3 . These pores are much measurements of the segments in are I, 32; 11,
more numerous (above 20 %) in the adult than in 27; III, 34; IV, 20; V, 22; VI, 62. Eye is about 22
the third-instar females. Tubular ducts are of two in diameter at the base and 10 high. Beak is
types: oral rim ducts and oral collar ducts, the conical, on an average 94 long and 57 wide at
2 Morphology 15

the base. Thorax: Average measurements of pos- imate numbers are dorsal abdominal segments IX,
terior leg in are trochanter, 46 26; femur, 9; VIII, 9; VII, 18; VI, 13; V, 15; IV, 16; III, 22; II,
98 38; tibia, 84 20; tarsus, 74 18; claw, 21; 19; metathorax, 20; mesothorax, 44; prothorax,
tarsal digitule, 34; claw digitule, 20. Anterior spir- 32; head, 26; and ventral abdominal segments IX,
acle is about 29 long and 8 wide at atrium; 4; VIII, 5; VII, 10; VI, 9; V, 8; IV, 7; III, 8; II, 7;
posterior one about 31 long and 9 at atrium. metathorax, 11; mesothorax, 21; prothorax, 16;
Abdomen: Anal ring on an average is 36 in head, 17. The microducts are of oral collar type,
diameter; anal ring setae are 66 long; apical about 7 long, present on both dorsum and ven-
setae are on an average 172 long. Anal lobe bar ter. The ducts in dorsum are wider (3.23.6 )
is moderately sclerotised. Dermal structures: than those in venter about 2.4 ; their numbers are
Three trilocular disc pores and one to three setae dorsal abdominal segments IX, 2; VIII, 5; VII, 2;
on both upper and lower lips of anterior pair of VI, 2; V, 2; IV, 5; III, 3; II, 7; metathorax, 4; meso-
ostioles and two to three pores and zero to one thorax, 6; prothorax, 5; head, 4; and ventral
seta on each lip of the posterior pair are present. abdominal segments IX, 0; VIII, 1; VII, 3; VI, 4;
Circulus is present. Trilocular disc pores are about V, 3; IV, 2; III, 2; II, 2; metathorax, 2; mesothorax,
3 and more numerous on dorsum. Their approx- 2; prothorax, 2; head, 3.

Second-instar male nymph of M. hirsulus. OCD oral Third-instar male nymph of M. hirsutus. ANT antenna, AS
collar duct anterior spiracle, MLDP multilocular disc pore, AO ante-
(Courtesy: Ghose SK) rior ostiole, PO posterior ostiole, AT anal tube, WL
wing-bud

2.4.6 Third-Instar Male Nymph the antennae of fourth-instar male become prom-
inent, as and when these are formed inside the
Body is oval, more rounded at the anterior end, antennae of third instar. Mouthparts are absent.
on an average 1.138 mm long and 0.504 mm Eyes are not discernible.
wide. Sclerotisation is in general very weak. Thorax: Two small wing buds more or less at
Head: Segmentation of antennae is obscure, right angles to the lateral margins of the mesotho-
with the average length being 276 . The joints of rax. Legs are short in comparison with body
16 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

length, with a few pointed setae. Average mea- present in between the abdominal segments
surements in are trochanter, 52 32; femur, IXX, but its opening on dorsum or venter is not
112 43; segmentation of tibia, tarsus and claw is discernible. Near the posterior end of the abdo-
not well differentiated, their combined length and men, six to seven setae are arranged transversely.
maximum breadth being 175 31. Tarsal and Marginal and submarginal areas of segment IX
claw digitules are absent. Anterior spiracle is dorsally with ve to six more or less transversely
about 29 and posterior one is 29 long and 14 arranged setae are present.
wide. Dermal structures: Both anterior and posterior
Abdomen: Anal ring is absent. A well- pair of ostioles are present. Trilocular disc pores
sclerotised anal tube, 23 long and 26 wide, is are absent.

Fourth-instar male nymph of M. hirsutus. WP wing pad Adult male of M. hirsutus. CS coronal suture, DS
Digitiform seta, QDP quadrilocular disc pore, PS penial
sheath, PW part of wing, PSG penta locular stellate gland,
DE dorsal eye, LE lateral eye, VE ventral eye
2 Morphology 17

Multilocular disc pores: It is 5 in diameter, Dermal structures: Both anterior and posterior
found on both dorsum and venter. Their numbers pairs of ostioles are present, with two multilocu-
are dorsal abdominal segments IX, 1; VIII, 4; lar disc pores and one seta on each lip of posterior
VII, 11; VI, 3; V, 4; IV, 4; III, 9; II, 4; metathorax, pair. Multilocular disc pores, 5 in diameter, are
2; mesothorax, 6; prothorax, 13; head, 8; and present on both dorsum and venter. Their num-
ventral abdominal segments IX, 0; VIII, 2; VII, 3; bers are dorsal abdominal segments IX, 0; VIII,
VI, 3; V, 3; IV, 4; III, 2; II, 2; metathorax, 8; 3; VII, 9; VI, 3; V, 4; IV, 4; III, 4; II, 4; metatho-
mesothorax, 7; prothorax, 6; head 0. Microducts rax, 5; mesothorax, 3; prothorax, 12; head, 0; and
are of oral collar type, about long, present on ventral abdominal segments, IX, 0; VIII, 2; VII,
both dorsum and venter. Ducts of dorsum are 2; VI, 2; V, 2; IV, 3; III, 2; II, 4; metathorax, 5;
about 3.2 wide, whereas those of venter are mesothorax, 5; prothorax, 4; head, 0. Microducts
about 2.4 . Their numbers are dorsal abdominal are of oral collar type, about 7 long, present on
segments IX, 0; VIII, 7; VII, 5; VI, 10; V, 10; IV, both dorsum and venter. The ducts of dorsum are
14; III, 19; II, 19; metathorax, 14; mesothorax, 4; much wider (about 3.2 ) than those of venter
prothorax, 16; head, 4; and ventral abdominal (1.82.4 ) arranged more or less in transverse
segments IX, 0; VI, 3; VII, 4; VI, 7; V, 5; IV, 5; rows. Their approximate numbers are dorsal
III, 8; II, 4; metathorax, 5; mesothorax, 2; protho- abdominal segments IX, 0; VIII, 13; VII, 10; VI,
rax, 6: head, 3. 13; V, 13; IV, 17; III, 17; II, 11; metathorax, 8;
mesothorax, 4; prothorax, 30; head, 4; and ven-
tral abdominal segments IX, 0; VIII, 4; VII, 8; VI,
2.4.7 Fourth-Instar Male Nymph 8; V, 8; IV, 12; III, 01; II, 0; metathorax, 0;
mesothorax, 0; prothorax, 10; head, 0.
Anterior end of the body is round, narrowing Adult males are only of macropterous form,
gradually on the posterior end, on an average on an average 1.055 mm long, including the pro-
1.061 mm long and 0.340 mm wide. Head, thorax jected penial sheath, and 0.310 mm wide. Head:
and abdomen are more differentiated than the Ten jointed antennae, average measurements in
previous instar; sclerotisation is weak. Head: Ten are I, 39; II, 66; III, 79; IV, 69; V, 66; VI, 63; VII,
jointed antennae, average measurements in are 67; VIII, 67; IX, 58; X, 71. The antennae are
I, 34; II, 46; III, 34; IV, 24; V, 27; VI, 29; VII, 32; clothed mainly with digtiform setae, up to about
VIII, 37; IX, 34; X, 74; second segment is the 39 ; a few thicker specialised digtiform setae are
broadest. Mouthparts are absent. Eyes are not present on the last three apical segments, the lon-
discernible. Thorax: Average measurements of gest ones being 39, 49 and 49 on segments VIII,
hind leg in are trochanter; 60 29; femur, IX and X, respectively. Coronal suture is well
128 44; tibia, 142 28; tarsus, 101 25; claw, developed. Dorsomedian sclerite is weakly
16; tarsal and claw digitules are absent. Anterior sclerotised. Three pairs of eyes are present: dor-
spiracle is about 26 long and 13 wide at sal, ventral and lateral. The average diameter of
atrium; posterior one is about 31 long and 16 the dorsal and ventral pairs is 30 and 34 , respec-
at atrium. Wing pads are obliquely attached to tively. Lateral pair is 25 in diameter at the base
the mesothorax. Abdomen: In segment X, six to and 18 high on an average. Mouthparts are
seven setae are transversely arranged on dorsum. absent. Thorax: One pair of wings, on an average
Two marginal setae are on dorsum on each side 0.92 mm long and 0 .42 mm wide; each wing has
of segment IX, the longest one about 63 , and four to ve sensory setae near the basal region;
two corresponding ones on venter about 17 . average measurements of the posterior leg in
Anal tube, apparently without an external open- are trochanter, 62 26; femur, 216 39; tibia,
ing, is present in between segments IX and X, 22 283 23; tarsus, 99 19; claw, 34; tarsal digitule
long and 26 wide. Penial sheath of adult male is very slender, 34. As in antennae, legs are
is visible as and when it is formed inside this clothed with both digitiform and slender-pointed
stage. setae, their maximum length being 31 and 21 ,
18 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

respectively. The inner distal end of tibia has disc pores are present on each side of the
three spines. Tarsus has three to four spines at the abdominal segment IX. In the centre of each clus-
inner distal end. Anterior and posterior spiracles ter, there are eight to ten disc pores of smaller
are about 21 wide at atrium, their lengths being dimension (about 4 in diameter) and three long
23 and 26 . Abdomen: Penial sheath is about 179 setae, two of which on an average are 260 long.
long and 70 at the widest portion and 6.5 at Around the central zone 3844 disc pores, 5 in
the projected tip, which is rounded. It has two diameter, are present.
distinct median lobes, each more or less triangu-
lar in shape. Dermal structures: Only posterior
pair of ostioles is present. Quadrilocular disc References
pores, 4.85.6 in diameter, are present on both
dorsum and venter; numbers on dorsum are Ghose SK (1971) Morphology of various instars of both
sexes of the mealy-bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus
abdominal segments IX, 0; VIII, 4; VII, 2; VI, 2;
(Green) (Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera). Indian J Agric
V, 3; IV, 2; III, 2; II, 11; metathorax, 0; mesotho- Sci 41(7):602611
rax, 0; prothorax, 816; head, 4; and ventral McKenzie HL (1967) Morphology and classication.
abdominal segments IX, 0; VIII, 3; VII, 3; VI, 3; Mealybugs of California, University of California
Press, Berkeley, pp 3640
V, 3; IV, 3; III, 0; II, 2; metathorax, 2; mesotho-
Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
rax, 48; prothorax, 48; head, 0. Two dorsal Natural History Museum, Southdene Sdn. Bhd., Kaula
clusters of stellate or tail-forming pentalocular Lumpur, Malaysia, pp 1821
Cytogenetics
3
Ramakrishna Sompalaym, Kokilamani A.
Lingarajaiah, Raju G. Narayanappa, Jayaprakash,
and Venkatachalaiah Govindaiah

3.1 Introduction Schraders interpretation was later conrmed


experimentally with a mealybug, for example,
The coccoids which include mealybugs are a rel- Pseudococcus obscurus and/or Planococcus citri
atively small group of highly specialized hemip- by Brown and his associates (Brown 1958, 1959,
teran insects. They are parasitic on plants and 1963, 1964, 1965, 1969; Brown and Nelson-Rees
quite sedentary in behavior (Miller and Kosztarab 1961; Chandra 1962, 1963a, b; Brown and Nur
1979; Gullan and Kosztarab 1997; Mani 1989; 1964; Baer 1965; Nur 1963, 1966a, b, 1967;
Kondo et al. 2008). The chromosome system of Brown and Weigmann 1969). Earlier cytological
coccoids is of special interest because it is char- scrutiny had been reviewed by White (1973) and
acterized by chromosomal heterochromatization certain aspects of coccoid chromosome systems
or elimination of the paternal endowment of especially their possible role in the involvement
chromosomes during early embryogeny of the in the chromosome imprinting processes, have
male in the majority of scale insects. The rst been aptly dealt with by Brown (1977) and
cytological insight into the nature of this remark- Brown and Chandra (1977), about certain unusual
able system came from the pioneering cytology features by Nur (1980, 1990), and about recent
described by Schrader (1921, 1923a). Subsequent achievements made with respect to biochemical-
studies by Hughes-Schrader (1948) have pro- based cytology by Prantera and Bongiorni (2012).
vided insightful thoughts into the explanation of Enormous and extensive cytological and genetic
the genetic and evolutionary implications of studies of mealybugs belonging to worldwide fauna
paternal heterochromatization that could serve are available (Little 1957; Carter 1962). However,
as an intermediate stage between regular diploidy the efforts on the systematic and cytogenetic aspects
and true male-haploidy. of Indian coccoids are very limited. There have

Jayaprakash
Department of Zoology, Bangalore University,
R. Sompalaym (*) K.A. Lingarajaiah
Bengaluru 560 056, India
Department of Zoology, Bangalore University,
Bengaluru 560 056, India Centre for Applied Genetics, Bangalore University,
e-mail: srkbuz@ymail.com Bengaluru 560 056, India
R.G. Narayanappa V. Govindaiah
Department of Biotechnology, KSOU, Centre for Applied Genetics, Bangalore University,
Mukthagangotri, Mysore 570 006, India Bengaluru 560 056, India

Springer India 2016 19


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_3
20 R. Sompalaym et al.

been sporadic reports that provide incomplete and during successive divisions. In the absence of
contradictory information pertaining to Indian kinetochore-based cell divisions that prevail in
fauna for their chromosome systems (Tulsyan coccoid chromosome systems, and also, in order
1963; Dikshith 1964, 1966; Chauhan 1970, 1977). to accommodate the occurrence of karyotypic
changes, Brown (1961) assays chromosome frac-
ture and fusions in the place of the prevalent
3.2 Mealybug Chromosomes nature of chromosomal rearrangements. It was
also envisaged that simple breakage can deter-
All coccoids possess holocentric chromosomes, mine increase or decrease in chromosome num-
that is, diffuse centromeres (Hughes-Schrader bers unless a breakagefusionbridge cycle
and Ris 1941). Inverse meiosis is a second ances- intervenes to eliminate the breakage points.
tral condition manifested in coccoids that is also Species relationships can be explained by cit-
shared with the other closely allied aphids (Ris ing chromosome variability occurring with
1942; Hughes-Schrader 1944, 1948). respect to either chromosome numbers or mor-
Although the cell cycle sequence is different phology. Brown (1961) insists upon spontaneous
from that of typical meiosis, results are the same; occurrence of chromosome breakage resulting in
each of the four chromatids of meiotic bivalents abundant availability of ruptured chromosomes
reaches one of the four nuclei produced by meio- for increase in the diploid numbers either by
sis. Coccoids are also manifested by those systems chance or incurred by selection. There are an
in which at least some of the females are produced abundant number of cases dealing with karyo-
parthenogenetically, in addition to the usual bisex- typic changes incurring based on chromosome
ual mode of reproduction. They are considered to fragmentation in mealybug genomes (Nur et al.
have unique chromosome systems and they offer 1987; Cook 2000).
enormous potential in our understanding of prob- Changes in chromosome numbers with respect
lems such as chromosome imprinting and differ- to pseudococcid species have been reported to be
ential regulation of homologous chromosome sets in the range of 8 to 64 and that ranges within coc-
(Chandra 1971; Chandra and Brown 1973). coids are rather small compared to other insect
Chandra (1971) suggested for the rst time that groups (Hughes-Schrader 1948; Nur et al. 1987).
there are some similarities and also contrasts Until now, 115 cytogenetically studied species of
between mammalian X-chromosome inactivation mealybugs belonging to 44 genera have been
and the inactivation of paternal chromosomes in made known (Gavrilov 2007; Gavrilov and
mealybugs. These include genomic imprinting, Trapeznikova 2007, 2010). Eventhough, the dip-
facultative heterochromatization, and differential loid number of chromosomes ranges from 8 to 64,
regulation of homologous chromosomes. the modal number seem to fall on 10 (Plate 3.6
Subsequently, Brown and Chandra (1977) have Fig. 4, 6, 8). Few mealybugs showed intrageneric
drawn attention to emphasize that coccoids are at variation in their chromosome numbers; for exam-
the pinnacle of an evolutionary pyramid of cytoge- ple, in genera such as Antonina (2n = 12, 16,
netic variants and complexity. In order to under- 24 + Bs), Nesopedronia (2n = 18, 14, 10) and
stand these variations in chromosome mechanics, Trionymus (2n = 16, 10, 8), such instances can be
it becomes essential briey to review pseudococ- cited as useful in taxonomic and phylogenetic con-
cid chromosomes. siderations of the genus. Accessory chromosomal
elements (B-chromosomes) were found in several
species of mealybugs (Nur et al. 1987; Gavrilov
3.3 Chromosome Numbers 2004). But, the detailed investigation of
and Chromosome Forms B-chromosomes has been done only in
Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret; Nur 1962a,
Coccoid chromosomes lack specied centro- 1966a, b). The majority of pseudococcids possess
meric regions. It appears obvious to point out that 2n = 10 (Nur et al. 1987; Moharana 1990; Nur
chromosome fragments perpetuate themselves 1990; Gavrilov and Trapeznikova 2007, 2010).
3 Cytogenetics 21

Excepting Planococcus citri and a few other spe- species. Based upon female pachytene chromo-
cies, the number of species studied based on meric sequences, Raju (1994) made an initial
employing recently evolved cytogenetic tech- attempt to describe karyotype and comparison of
niques is very low. One of the reasons cited was three species of the Indian genus Planococcus
the difculties incurred in procuring enough cells (viz. P. citri, P. lilacinus and P. pacicus) essen-
for the preparation of chromosomes and of under- tially based on differential banding patterns, but
standing of chromosome basics for detailed cyto- was unable to identify individualistic karyotypes
logical analyses. For cytological investigations of because of lack of discriminating cytogenetic fea-
Indian mealybug taxa, Parida and Moharana tures (Plates 15). Gavrilov (2004a, 2007) and
(1982) and Moharana (1990) attempted to enu- Gavrilov and Trapeznikova (2007, 2010) have
merate chromosome numbers based on conven- made elaborate studies resulting in the elucidation
tional cytological techniques and they were also of the karyotype for more than 25 species of
able to present preliminary assessments of karyo- Russian mealybugs based on squashing techniques
morphological features for more than 20 different for chromosomal preparations. Nur et al. (1987)

Plate 3.1 Planococcus citri


22 R. Sompalaym et al.

Plate 3.2 Planococcus lilacinus

were able to describe the karyotype of about 80 Mckenzie 1967 (California), Drozdovskiy 1966
different species of mealybugs that were collected (Russia), Brown 1961 and Hughes-Schrader 1935
from various parts of Africa, America, and a few (USA), and Schrader 1923a (USA) have contributed
from South Asia. Tremblay et al. 1977 (Italy), enormously to the eld of mealybug cytogenetics
3 Cytogenetics 23

Plate 3.3 Planococcus pacicus

in the form of karyological studies. In an attempt complements did not provide any discriminative
to analyse mealybug chromosome morphology, cytological signatures other than suggesting that
chromosome preparations were studied through they belong to and qualify themselves as belong-
the uorescent microscopy using appropriate dyes ing to the Lecanoid type of chromosome system
(e.g., Quinacrine Mustard (QM)/QM dihydrochlo- (Jaipuriar et al. 1985; Venkatachalaiah and
ride), and it was found that these chromosomal Chowdaiah 1987; Venkatachalaiah 1989).
24 R. Sompalaym et al.

Plate 3.4 Planococcus pacicus

3.4 Telomeres and C- Bands C-staining proles along the length of each chro-
mosomal fragment in the complement.
It is of interest to note that with particular impor- Employing classical C-staining protocol upon
tance to the diffuse nature of centromeric systems Planococcus citri metaphase chromosomal prep-
manifested by coccoid chromosome morphology arations, it was expected to highlight constitu-
it was expected to display discriminative tively heterochromatic sites in the complement.
3 Cytogenetics 25

Plate 3.5 Planococcus citri


26 R. Sompalaym et al.

Plate 3.6 Representatives of other pseudococcids

But the cursory observations led in demonstrat- this chromosomal component may offer convey-
ing that the C-specic bands were found speci- ing information about its cytogenetic context.
cally identifying the telomeric region specicity The situation acquires a genetic signature due to
in the metaphasic chromosomal complement and its co-orientation pairings during late meiotic
this situation was ascribed as T-bands (male or female) chromosome synaptic processes
(Venkatachalaiah 1989; Raju 1994). However, (Plate 3.7 Fig. 6, 7, 8, 9).
the results obtained by Venkatachalaiah (1989) Ferraro et al. (1998), in their attempt to local-
and Raju (1994) pertaining to C-banded stainings ize C-banded regions at P. citri chromosomal
at telomeric ends of each chromosome in the preparations, found evidence regarding
complement were irrespective of a particular C-positive bands localizing at the telomeric
chromosome type (whether of mitotic, meiotic, regions of all chromosomes in the complement.
or polyploid nuclei) or sexes (males or females), When they further insisted upon prior exposure
and thus, they contend that these cytological to CMA3 (chromomycin A3) -methyl green and
markers could be representing a particular type subsequent exposure to C-staining protocols, the
of constitutive heterochromatic component. The implicit C-bands were found correspond to telo-
intense stainability at the telomeric regions in the meric region-specic areas. This has led them to
chromosomal content allows one to assay that infer that these results could, however, representing
3 Cytogenetics 27

Plate 3.7 Representatives of other pseudococcids showing NOR- entities and C-band regions

GC-rich specic spots on chromosomes. From the point of view of cytology, telomeres
However, when they insisted further upon are marked by specialized DNA and protein
H33258 uorochrome to live cells prior to components that usually decorate the chromo-
C-staining, they recovered images almost imitat- some ends or other specic loci. In several
ing C-banded telomeric-specic regions. Thus eukaryotes, their occurrence and prevalence has
they were able to interpret the failure to nd a been tested, wherein they have been found com-
dull appearance, instead of bright bands at the posed of simple tandem pentameric (TTAGG)
specied locales, and those of brighter and repeats localizable at specic chromosome loci
intense bandings could represent condensed con- accompanied by complex subtelomeric struc-
stitutive heterochromatic regions, leading them tures in close apposition (DAiuto et al. 2003; De
to insist that there could be more DNA congre- Lange 2005). A large number of molecular cyto-
gated per unit length per chromosome than in the logical studies have led to the implication that
euchromatic zones. Moreover, some of the telo- telomeres of eukaryotes are usually composed of
meric regions being positive to DAPI stainings, it conserved short tandemly repeated GC-rich
was inferred that the presence of AT-rich sequences. This kind of sequence conservation is
sequences were embedded within the predomi- reected as a common mechanism for telomere
nantly GC-rich regions of individual region biosynthesis. This mechanism specically
chromosomes. dictates and involves the activity pattern of a
28 R. Sompalaym et al.

telomerase, a ribonucleoprotein DNA poly- tion of TTAGG repeats decorating at chromo-


merase enzyme that compensates any further loss somal interstitial regions. Because of their
of terminal sequences at every replication round resistance to higher doses of ionizing radiation, a
by adding short tandem GC-rich sequences onto unique feature characterizing the mealybug
the chromosome ends (Greider 1995). genome and this extraordinary chromosomal
Studies in various insect species demonstrated phenomena could as well serve as an asset
characteristic presence towards the notion that towards relegating them to be considered as a
TTAGG repeats are an ancient motif traceable in radiation-resistant coccid.
Arthropoda and that those pentameric TTAGG Mohan et al. (2012) further attempted to test
repeats that could have been originated from the responses with still higher doses of ionizing radia-
vertebrate TTAGGG hexamers (Frydrychov tion exposure on P. citri genomes and were thus
et al. 2004; Vitkova et al. 2005). able to utilize this opportunity to suggest that
Cytogenetic scrutiny undertaken by Mohan mealybug genome may well serve as a unique
et al. (2011) with regard to Planococcus citri genetic system. The results of their explorations
chromosomes have enabled them to delineate the revealed that especially pounding concentration
presence of a characteristic pattern of telomeric on the centromeric property that was eventually
sequences and also some of their placements recognized as sites of activity sporadically spread-
upon the respective interstitial loci and the con- ing over the length, and in spite of this enormity
stitutive presence of active telomerases was there is no signicant loss of the genetic material.
detected and this was achieved by introducing Furthermore, with respect to the mealybug
single primer PCR and Southern hybridization genome, it was considered to contain highly toler-
protocols upon cytological preparations. The able radiation doses as high as 1100 Gy. Presently,
results so obtained suggest that in particular, P. it is apparent that mealybug genomes may serve as
citri chromosome complement seemed to pro- very efcient agents of the DNA repair machinery
vide as an efcient chromosome marker to system that ensures proper healing of double-
demarcate the chromosomal loci at the site of the strand breaks (dsb) invaded by ionizing radiation.
mechanism of formulation of TTAGG repeats at Despite several special qualities,proclaimed as
their respective chromosome ends. In addition, containing, for example, of telomeric repeats
this study was also aided in identifying and thus along with interstitial sites of chromosomes and
disclosing whether some unrelated low copy with respect to maintenance and sustainability of
repeats, called Intercept TTAGG Sequences telomeres to higher radiation effects, some authors
(ITS) were displaying identiable spots based on believe regardless of the vulnerability of the telo-
their presence, thereby intercepting the repetitive meric-independent mechanism it could also be
elements. It is well known that P. citri genomes operating in a P. citri genetic system.
are bestowed with diffuse centromere (holocen- Thus, the occurrence of C-heterochromatin
tric) activity and as a consequence of this nature occupying telomeric regions of chromosomes
there could be an obvious presence of multiple deserves some comments. In its usual courses of
centromeric zones occupying the length along other cases, incidentally pertaining to holocentric
individual chromosomes. Utilizing this extraor- chromosome systems, it was possible to ascribe
dinary condition, in view of these genetic pecu- that C-heterochromatin is preferentially located
liarities persisted with elegant DNA repair at or near telomeres (Muramoto 1980; Camacho
machinery that ensures the protection of addi- et al. 1985; Papeschi 1998; Panzera et al. 1992).
tional chromosomal elements localizing at inter- According to Heitzs (1933) equilocal hetero-
stitial zones; and thus they aptly recognize these chromatin distribution hypothesis, it was
sites as putative zones. Surprisingly, following inferred that the C-banding material in both
X-ray irradiation upon these broken chromo- homologous and nonhomologous chromosomal
somal ends it was disclosed that some loci were sets tends to congregate at homogeneous and
characteristic and were tagged with the associa- homologous regions, thereby occupying similar
3 Cytogenetics 29

kinds of cytological sites, and thus probably rep- (Nucleolar Organizer Region) specicities on
resented by either telomeric and/or centromeric metaphase chromosomes. These results point to
sequences. Schweizer and Loidl (1987) have pro- have driven them to ascribe that the FISH tech-
posed a model that explains how nique might help in identify with P. citri chromo-
C-heterochromatin enhances and leads to adher- somes at specic zones on all chromosomes
ence of such chromosomal zones conning and/ except at one pair in the complement. But silver
or inducing towards effecting interchanges of nitrate staining specicity had enabled in speci-
heterochromatic material between nonhomolo- fying at a single pair in the complement but char-
gous and homologous chromosomes in the com- acteristically demonstrating the site at which
plement and thus leading towards annealing into bearing very prominent macer-shaped, silver
a common platform resulting in such situation nitrate stainable entities, irrespective of their ori-
that they belong to as though in a monocentric gin whether of euchromatic or heterochromatic
type of chromosome system; that also insists chromosomal pair (Plate 3.7 Fig. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5).
upon those of chromosomal regions with holoki-
netic activity that do not t into this model. In
view of the limited information gathered from 3.5 B- Chromosomes
other homopteran examples, an effort was made
to dene that the nature and kind of telomeric During the courses of systematic cytological
components that were found enhanced to estab- study in the case of Pseudococcus afnis chro-
lish as a C-banded heterochromatin. Moreover, mosomal complement that possesses supernu-
Panzera et al. (1992) and Prez et al. (1997) merary B chromosomes which were transmitted
based on their limited experience offer the opin- without the reduction during spermatogenetic
ion, especially of Triatoma meiotic systems, that courses that were found exhibiting a strong mei-
the tendency of the heterochromatin component otic drive, in such processes (Nur 1962a, b,
inferring to change in accordance with from one 1969). Prior to spermatogenesis, the B chromo-
chromosome to another or from proximal to dis- some was heterochromatic, but during prophase I
tal sites of the same chromosomes within a com- of spermatogenesis it became evident that even
plement. However, this characteristic cytological less condensed than the euchromatic set (i.e.,
feature was found on preferential localization of negatively heteropycnotic) and this change in
telomeric heterochromatic content of some condensation property apparently makes this sit-
instance cases alone probably thereby reecting uation possible for the Bs to segregate with the
upon C-banded components. These proposals are euchromatic set and be transmitted over to 90 %
in congruence with those of the Schweizer and of the offspring. Nur and Brett (1985, 1987,
Loidl (1987) hypothesis, but this type of chromo- 1988) have presented subjective data supporting
somal behavior is not in any way agreeable to that acquisition of the condensation property of
certain terms with other instance cases analyzed As and Bs during spermatogenesis seemed to
from other homopteran examples for the said infer that this situation is due to the presence of
purposes including the coccoid chromosome genotype that affects the rate of transmission of
systems. the Bs in males. However, it is somewhat clear
Ferraro et al. (1998) had undertaken an elobo- that this situation became evident because of the
rate proceedings in view of eliciting and appro- inuence of this genotype which has affected the
priating the preponderance of the ribosomal condensation property of B, but not the property
cistrons and upon highlighting of their cytologi- of heterochromatization. However, Klein and
cal localization based on the mealybug chromo- Eckhart (1976) theorized that difference between
somal preparations. This analysis had led to the Bs and regular chromosomes of Pseudococcus
results so obtained by means of the FISH tech- afnis could be due to changes occurring at the
nique and of subsequently staining the same with DNA sequences level. Another probable reason
silver nitrate solution for localizing NOR sighted was the differences observed between the
30 R. Sompalaym et al.

A and B sets that could be due to the occurrence licate or having replicated once, the euchromatic
of DNA of the two types of heterochromatin that sets replicated several times (Lorick 1970; Nur
being methylated. Thus, the percentage of 1966c, 1970, 1972).
5-methylcytosine in the DNA of P. afnis was The sex-specic association of the microor-
found to be higher in males than in females, and ganisms has led to the suggestion that they may
higher in females without Bs than in females with have a role in sex determination (Buchner 1965).
Bs (Scarbrough et al. 1984). However, the precise nature and role of endo-
symbionts in normal development has not been
clearly assessed. Biochemical and morphological
3.6 Polyploidy analyses of isolated endosymbionts have estab-
and Endosymbionts lished their prokaryotic characteristics (Houk and
Grifths 1980; Ishikawa 1989). The 16 s rRNA
In most species of mealybugs the polar bodies re- gene sequences of several homopteran insect
enter the egg and contribute to or give rise to endosymbionts including those of certain species
large polyploid cells (mycetocytes) that house of mealybugs and aphids, have been considered
intracellular bacterial symbionts (Brown 1965). for their role in the prevalence of phylogenetic
In some mealybugs, cells formed by polar bodies relationships among those species probed for
1 and 2 are known to be totipotent. In male those purposes (Munson et al. 1991, 1992;
mealybugs and in other coccoid families, one Kantheti 1994). However, the nature and extent
portion of the genome becomes heterochromatic of type of expression of the concerned gene
and the other becomes euchromatic (genetically inquisition during the course of insect develop-
active) in several tissues or organs (Tremblay ment are not clearly explained. Buchner (1965)
and Caltagirone 1973). These include the midgut, reported that extracellular symbionts are present
the Malpighian tubules, the salivary glands, in the females of Stictococcus but absent in the
oenocytes, and serosa (Nur 1967, 1972). One males. Most coccoids contain intracellular bacte-
characteristic of most of these tissues is that their ria or yeastlike symbionts present in the cyto-
nuclei later become polyploid as a result of endo- plasm of special cells, the mycetocytes (Tremblay
reduplication or endomitosis (Plate 3.6 Fig. 3, 5, 1977, 1989). The origin of the mycetocytes is of
9). During oogenesis, polar bodies do not degen- interest because it may vary between, as well as
erate; instead they re-enter the egg cell, and fuse within, families. Therefore, it appears probable
with each other and also with some of the cleav- that the origin of mycetocytes may have an
age nuclei and form polyploid cells called myce- important bearing on the pseudococcid genetic
tocytes. These mycetocytes are invaded by system (Hughes-Schrader 1948).
certain maternally transmitted microorganisms Interestingly, Kantheti et al. (1996) reported
generally referred as symbionts. Mycetocytes an isolation of the 16S rRNA gene sequenced
harboring such symbionts form an organ called segment, designated as P7 from an embryonic
mycetomes whose function is not known (Brown cDNA library of Planococcus lilacinus, which
1965; Nur 1977). Such symbionts are transovari- was found to be an encouraging attempt and by
ally transmitted to the next generation and thus hybridizing to the genomic DNA of females to
show maternal inheritance (Buchner 1965). the assay, but not to that of males. Interestingly
Euchromatization, however, is apparently not an P7 showed no hybridization to nuclei of either
essential step in the development of these tissues, sex, raising the possibility that it was extrachro-
because these types of tissues involved may vary mosomal in origin. Using electron microscopic
between congeneric species. Moreover, the fre- images, especially of P7 clones but not of P3,
quency of cells in which euchromatization occurs annealing was found to the adult female abdomi-
sometimes varies between individuals. However, nal organ called mycetomes. Electron micros-
in those nuclei in which the paternal genome copy has disclosed the presence of symbionts
remained heterochromatic, it usually did not rep- within the mycetocytes. Sequence analysis
3 Cytogenetics 31

showed that P7 is a 16 s rRNA gene conrming These bizarre genetic systems are of immense
its prokaryotic origin. P7 expression is detectable help in our attempt to understand further upon the
in young embryos of both sexes but the absence occurrence of a variety of sex-determining mech-
of P7 in third instar and adult males suggests that anisms prevailing in scale insects in the light of
the designated gene containing isolated gene their inherent property of inverse meiosis effec-
sequences assay and hence, consideration of pro- tively driving them through the efforts of holoki-
visional endosymbionts are the subject and object netic chromosome mechanics. Most species of
of sex-specic elimination/acquisition type of coccoids are bisexuals with extreme sexual
operating processes. dimorphism but due to precariousness of male
populations at times, some of them have become
parthenogenetic. These complex genetic systems
3.7 Mechanism of Sex appear invigorating due to the involvement of
Determination both the bisexual as well as the parthenogenetic
mode of reproduction. Another noteworthy fea-
In many species, sex determination is associated ture is inicted on them due to the deliverance of
with the inheritance of a heteromorphic chromo- quadrinucleate spermatid formation in many
some pair in one sex. However, not all species mealybug (bisexual) chromosome systems. It is
have evolved from a common ancestor that pos- thus possible to surmise that the various types of
sessed such an heteromorphic sex chromosome meiosis that were confronted within the scale
set. Rather, XXXY sex determination appears insect examples could have arisen in a derivative
to have arisen independently many times in evo- form or in a succeeding form from that of primi-
lution from the XXXO type form. The XXXY tive homopteran (aphidcoccid line) examples
sex chromosomes of ies and mammals also including aphid chromosome systems (XXXO
arose independently, but, the underlying mecha- system). It is thus possible to note that during the
nisms of sex determination are quite different and derivation processes it became inevitable in view
difcult to predict except in molecular terms. of the penchant situation prevailing with those
Coccoids are a unique and very peculiar group participants driving in through to the equatorial
of insects in view of their possessing a highly orientation of meiotic bivalents at rst meiosis
variable mode of sex-determining mechanisms. and of the preponderance of prereduction at
This situation becomes evident through the chiasma.
course of studying complex meiotic processes
incurred in a few select examples analyzed thus
far. Thus, this situation has led to the creation of 3.8 XXXO System
some academic interest by some earlier cytolo-
gists to pursue further upon attempting under- Sex determination in primitive coccoids could
stand the intricacies of meiosis and mitosis. have taken its initiation based on the XX ()XO
Interestingly, White (1973, 1978) took special () type of sex-determination mechanism.
interest in accommodating this opportunistic sit- Consequent upon this exigency, oogenesis is of
uation prevailing in mealybugs (scale insects) conventional type progressing through inverse
summarily termed as aberrant genetic systems, meiotic pathways, whereas spermatogenesis is
and Nur (1980) proclaimed unusual chromo- highly modied in most coccoids, mealybugs in
some systems but recent views indict them particular. In view of this unique situation, vari-
either as the more diverse or asymmetric able modes of expression pathways become
genetic system. Serendipity, as applied to these imminent as represented among analyzed primi-
scale insects, which are characterized by posses- tive margarodid examples. Currently, cytological
sion of a peculiar genetic system, was not found records have become known from margarodid
in any other animal system of comparable nature. assemblage of species that include taxa belong-
32 R. Sompalaym et al.

ing to Margarodidae, Ortheziidae, and Putoidae. cies of Puto demonstrated conventional meiotic
The cytological descriptions of these primitive chromosomal features. These species follow a
groups of species characteristically reveal that typical heterogametic mode of sex-determination
the sex of progeny is predetermined prior to and mechanisms, in which the males usually possess
at spermatogenesis; spermatozoa with the one chromosome less than that of females; char-
X-chromosome produce females and spermato- acteristically the example includes Puto species,
zoa lacking it produce males (Nur 1980). In this 2n = 1413; Puto albicans, 2n = 2019; and
extent, Brown (1977) placed primary emphasis Callipappus rubigonosus, 2n = 1413 (Brown
upon the coccoid chromosome system imparting and Cleveland 1968; Hughes-Schrader 1944).
the implicit nature of acquiring adaptive special- There are other taxa in which spermatogenesis is
ization and the same was found reected in the highly modied as was shown in meiosis of
progression of meiotic processes which in turn Protortonia and Matsucoccus gallicola dening
enabled categorizing into three types: (1) multiple sex chromosome systems. Surprisingly,
Margarodid assemblage, (2) Lecanoid types, and the only other report in which no morphologi-
(3) Diaspidid systems (Plate 3.8). In some cally identiable sex chromosomes were shown
Margarodid examples studied, spermatogenesis is represented by an example showing cytologi-
resembles that of conventional oogenesis, as is cal features for the whole Ortheziidae family,
especially evident in the case of Puto. Some spe- comprising 2n = 16 in both sexes (Brown 1958).

Plate 3.8 Representatives of other families of scale insects


3 Cytogenetics 33

3.9 Lecanoid System (i.e., imprinting) of and the activity status (of het-
erochromatization), of which the earlier process
In the Lecanoid chromosome type of coccoids seems likely to be an effective one at the ancestral
that exhibit a peculiar situation among coccoid stock and this attribute might reect in bringing
chromosome systems is one in which one hap- about differential condensation activity of the con-
loid set of chromosomes acquires heteropycno- cerned chromosomes. At this juncture, Brown (1977)
sis during the developmental course and also in felt that this situation appeared premature to the-
the germline cells. Those cells destined to become orize about or make any generalization unless
males acquire this status probably from mid- substantial molecular data were made available.
blastula onwards and persist through to adult life.
In the females, both sets of chromosomes in the
cell remain in the euchromatic state throughout 3.9.1 Parthenogenesis (Unisexual
the developmental course (Schrader 1921, 1923b; Reproduction)
Schrader and Hughes-Schrader 1926). The basis
for such an extraordinary situation in the mealy- While further pursuing the nature of the evolu-
bug chromosome is in the procession of acquisi- tionary trend involved during the course of sexu-
tion of the mechanism of heteropycnosis in male ality of scale insects, Hughes-Schrader (1948)
embryos and this involvement facilitates func- asserted that the prevalence of the parthenoge-
tional inequalities with respect to males that may netic mode of reproduction could be due to con-
point towards proclaiming them as physiological cordance with a higher incidence of disparity in
haploids, even though they have a duplex set in their reproductive potential. Thus, Hughes-
their nuclei (Plate 3.6). Brown and his group Schrader (1948) was able to discriminate bisexu-
have ventured into delineating the processes and als from those parthenogenetic ones and further
involvement of genetic mechanics of genomic suggested the appraisal of three fundamental
inactivation and of cytogenetics of heterochro- types of parthenogenetic products in them. Since
matinization processes in the genome (examples then, there have been considerable amounts of
include Planococcus, Phenacoccus, coccoid cytogenetic information procured by
Maconellicoccus, etc. of the family Brown and his associates that also afrmed that
Pseudococcidae and Laccifer of Kerridae). It is this situation based on cytogenetic surveillance
of interest to learn more about and probe further which acquired an innovative stimulus and pros-
the processes of heteropycnosis of the paternal pects including overall frequency of both bisex-
composition of the Lecanoid chromosomes and ual and parthenogenetic life cycle analysis from
as such it becomes imperative to note that this set among the select taxa of Coccoidea (Schrader
passed through the male phase but expressivity 1923b, 1931; Brown and Bennett 1957; Brown
was conned only to genetic male zygotes. 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966; Nur 1963, 1967, 1969;
Brown and Nur (1964) demonstrated earlier Hartl and Brown 1970). Subsequently, White
through their hybridization experiments that in (1973), who placed greater emphasis upon the
hybrid male embryos the mechanisms of hetero- parthenogenetic mode of reproduction and fur-
chromatinization of the paternal set can occur in thermore, on the implication and validity of het-
the cytoplasm of the foreign cell and thus this erosis during the courses of haplo-diploidy to
mechanism is not neccessarily a species-specic diplo-diploidy, was a matter of great antiquity.
characteristic, because heterochromatinization This and other cumulative studies (White 1978)
progression processes occur after several divi- have moved towards arriving at a conceptualiza-
sions of cleavage, and the paternal set must tion relating to efciency of homozygosity that
somehow seemed to have been marked (or would more likely to have an effective impact
learned) which could have been done or did prior upon haplo-diploids rather than diplo-diploidy.
to the entry of sperm into the egg (Chandra and Brown (1977), Hughes-Schrader (1948), and Nur
Brown 1975). Of the two processes, the marking (1971) have drawn inclinations towards suggesting
34 R. Sompalaym et al.

that it was at the cost of fragility and precarious- mated to have actively participated about eight
ness of males and of their implicit nature of effec- times during the course of evolutionary history
tiveness upon population measures, thereby (Brown 1965; White 1973). It was also felt that
imposing greater inconvenience on the part of the frequency of males (through Arrhenotoky) in
life-cycle strategies. Consequently, this kind of such populations was determined by the fre-
adaptiveness could have been driven towards an quency of haplo-diploids that arose in such con-
alternative mode of reproduction. Thus, the par- siderations. It is thus characteristic of any group
thenogenetic modes could be initiated by means with haplo-diploidy becoming much more
of adapting and involving either of Arrhenotoky inclined towards responding to the oppressive
or Deuterotoky or Thelytoky. But it was at the impact of environmental factors that accrued in
greater behest of Nurs (1969, 1970) concerted which sex ratio potential was deemed to have
efforts that had enabled him in eliciting and cat- been highly variable and it was also found to dif-
egorizing parthenogenomes each exhibiting dis- fer from species to species and even to the extent
tinct types of expression pattern. Subsequently, of genetic strains or of population level extremes.
Nur (1980) was also instrumental in document-
ing a revised format for parthenogenetic modes
of expression based on the following strategies: 3.11 Sex-Ratio Potential
whether the unfertilized eggs develop into males
(Arrhenotoky); or females (Thelytoky) or both In a majority of animal systems studied for the
(Deuterotoky); whether the males are haploid or prevalence of genetic-based sex-determining
diploid; and whether rst meiotic products mechanisms the extent was revealed of separate
between bivalents and oogonia remain the same sexes that direct each whether to become male or
(Gonoid thelytoky) or different (agonoid female, whereas in some taxa, hermaphroditism
thelytoky). may serve the primary mode of reproduction.
Whether a homomorphic (XXXX) or hetero-
morphic (XXXO) mode of sex determination
3.10 Arrhenotoky prevails in them, the sex ratio proportion seems
to be maintained in a harmonious manner (in a
Arrhenotoky is also called as haplo-diploid or 1:1 ratio). In such cases, where conventional dip-
haploid parthenogenesis in which males arise loidy exists, fathers and mothers often obtain
from unfertilized eggs. Males of haplo-diploids equal tness potential through to their sons and
may be referred to as impaternate because they daughters and hence, no sexual conict. But in
have no fathers. From the classical genetic point the case of alternative genetic systems, it becomes
of view, haplo-diploid species may have been essential to involve Trivers and Hares hypothe-
involved in recombinational processes (and sis (1976) that advocates the probabilities pre-
hence, Mendelian in character) inasmuch as they vailing for reproductive success of sons and
behave much to the same extent as those of sex- daughters that can differ markedly from parents.
limited characteristics, but possess no To that extent, they made a proposal in which
Y-chromosome. This, in a way, projects as a sort males and females were drawn into evolutionary
of male heterogamety in genetic characteristics; forces over the aspects of sex-allocation theory
on the other hand, Thelytoky offers a non- that depends on the inclusion and involvement of
Mendelian material thereby propelling it as a a particular genetic system (e.g., haplo-diploidy
reproductive devise. Haplo-diploidy or paternal genome elimination). In such
(Arrhenotoky), on the other hand, is a method of instances, a different set of reproductive trends
sex determination as well as a reproductive sys- seemed to follow in compliance with any biased
tem that involves replacement of an original sex- genetic transmission event that ensues which in
determining mechanism by an entirely new one turn can offer scope for the eventuality of sexual
under extraordinary circumstances. Hence, it conict. With particular reference to mealybug
could have occurred rarely in nature and was esti- examples, it becomes imperative to address the
3 Cytogenetics 35

DusingFischer formula (1976) that insists upon lies in the female germline tissues, suggesting
tness consequences of male and female off- that paternally inherited genes may still have the
spring that can vary with respect to the direct ability to inuence the fate of paternal chromo-
inuence or under duress of genetic and/or envi- somes in the germline but not in soma.
ronmental factors, even though selection prefers Scale insects consequently exhibit consider-
operating in such a way as to bring each into an able variations in their expression patterns based
equilibrium state. These generalizations can evi- on genetic and sex-determining mechanisms, in
dently be tested upon certain cases wherein genes spite of exhibiting similarity in their life-style
in fathers are only transmitted through daughters, strategies (Gullan and Kosztarab 1997; Nur
with sons being of no reproductive potential to 1980; Ross et al. 2011). Due to compulsions of
males. On the other hand, females gain tness their adaptive specializations imposed upon the
benets through both sons and daughters thereby morphology of male and female coccoids, how-
on demand for a possible expression of conicts ever, they differ enormously in terms of certain
over sex ratio. Orienting primarily towards other anatomical features. As is well-known
genetic consequences, the conventional diplo- among scale insects, males are winged hence
diploidy (XXXX system), becomes appar- motile, but with fragile stature although they
ent, in which case they still attempt to maintain a have a short life span based on acquisition of no
rigid sex ratio in the form of 1:1 because mothers feeding habituation, which may eventually suc-
and fathers do not vary through to the contribu- cumb to shortage of male populations. In con-
tions of daughters and sons and hence no sexual trast, females are robust, ornamental, and
conict. However, in unusual situations pertain- sedentary in habituation but have a longer life
ing to scale insects either haplo-diploidy or pater- span and are engrossed with gluttonous feeding
nal genome elimination (PGE) are offered as habits that might propel them to do better in con-
interesting but in extremity for an eventuality (as trolling sex-ratio propensities (Bull 1983).
the case may be). Earlier, Hughes-Schrader (1948) predicted that
On the other side, scale insects exhibit a dif- even though scale insects are besieged with vari-
ferent array of genetic systems, including haplo- able life-cycle strategies leading towards variable
diploidy as well as PGE offering as extremities. modes of genetic schemes, impulsively adaptive
The case of the mealybug (example Planococcus specialization could have driven them to acquir-
citri), provides an ideal system to pursue and ing Thelytoky and hermaphroditism. In fact
probe the kind of involvement and promotion of imposition of such kind of dwellings could have
sexual conict that it exhibits. It has PGE wherein been forced to serve as a clever device to dis-
the male component is in possession of haploid pense with the shortage of males. However,
nuclei, is (either it heterochromatized or) elimi- Brown (1977) contends that in spite of the com-
nated from meiotic cell lineage, and it is present plexities of several chromosome systems within
in somatic cells but untranscribed (Nur 1980). In the scale insects genetic systems, he contem-
terms of genetic mechanisms, the role of genomic plates acquisition of adaptive specialization, in
imprinting may be crucial. Scale insects are turn expanding towards acquiring exponential
known to represent the case in point of genomic taxonomic diversications. However, Nur (1980)
imprinting and imprinting of a paternal chromo- asserts that the fragility of the males may serve as
somal set alone is affected and also acts as a a primary instrument in an easing-out progres-
marker system for sex-determination mecha- sion during the courses of acquisition of a par-
nisms. In the case of mealybug paternal chromo- ticular mode of life-style activities or by adapting
somes especially of Lecanoids it is essential to to a particular chromosome system in succession.
point out that they remain in a latent state during The results obtained based on P. citri, have driven
the course of cell lineages. However, they get James (1937, 1938) and Nelson-Rees (1960) to
transmitted at the cost of a selective advantage. address that in Lecanoids, it appears possible to
Intriguingly, in P. citri, the site of genomic ascribe that females might play an impressive
imprinting of the paternal set of chromosomes role in selection and maintenance of sex-ratio
36 R. Sompalaym et al.

variability by their so adapting towards changes females prior to mating (James 1938; Ross et al.
and at times realigning to overcome any shortage 2010a). An increased understanding of sex allo-
of males. Changes in the sex ratio result in rein- cation theory in mealybugs might therefore yield
forcement of certain changes in developmental insightful opportunities to probe further into the
phases in the females which probably would potential ramications that drive in eliciting evo-
make arrangements towards shifting in the pro- lutionary advantages operating in proceeding
portion of procuring the requisite number of eggs towards extraordinary modes of sex-
and further upon imposing and resetting the determination mechanisms. The results obtained
paternal component onto the gambit of hetero- by Ross et al. (2011) upon P. citri experimenta-
chromatinization drive and in addition in an tions seem to point out appropriate levels that
effort to furthering towards a certain proportion were maintainable based on the role of high tem-
of eggs to be obtained profusely or curtailment. perature, older age at matings, and the starvation
All these adjustments mean amending changes in level, all of which seem to impress during the
contemplation within the scope of remodeling course of the consideration of sex-allocation the-
themselves towards acquiring and procuring a ories. These results may have inuenced changes
sufcient number of males. of expression patterns of female-biased sex
Consideration of imparting environmental ratios. But, they also propose that the effect of
forces upon such forces is based on the popula- temperature seemed rather weak and upon the
tion structure of offspring in responding to tness inuences of food restriction could have strongly
potential which would otherwise be driven implicated in reduced longevity and a transaction
towards differential expression patterns based on of the unusual schedule of male and offspring
the part of engrossing of established conict production across a female reproductive
drawn between parents and offspring. It is known lifetime.
that natural selection operates on those ratios in
which propelling forces rest on whether the par-
ents or offspring are in driving mode (Shuker 3.12 Recent Innovation Made
et al. 2009). It is also suspected that the offspring in Mealybug Genomes
can manipulate the sex-ratio potential thereby
affecting the sex allocation pattern. 3.12.1 Some Molecular Features
Trivers and Willard (1973) have conceived of
a pertinent opinion that environmental factors Heitzs (1928, 1929) unleashing of the opera-
could present oppressive effects on parents with tional denition of the term heterochromatin in
the possibilities of parental interference in an terms of its role in cell-cycle progression has trig-
effort to adjust sex allocation efcacy in the sex- gered momentum in cell biology to roll on
ratio potential. Environmental conditions experi- towards its own toll. This situation came as a
enced by parents can have direct interference natural ingredient for Brown (1966) to elicit suc-
during the course of sex allocation decisions pos- cinctly the ubiquitous nature of heterochromati-
sibly in one of two ways: either directly inuenc- nization serving as a pillar to the cytogenetic
ing parental conditions, or indirectly maintaining conundrum. While nurturing functional strate-
environmental factors as a cue to offspring t- gies, he succumbed to subdivide heterochromatin
ness. In P. citri, several environmental factors into two types: constitutive heterochromatin
have been explored especially pertaining to (CH) and facultative heterochromatin (FH).
embryogeny and other biological features of As a constituent of chromosomal architecture,
female reproduction. These measures include the constitutive heterochromatin comprises consid-
role of population density (Varndell and Godfrey erable portions of the genome in higher eukary-
1996; Ross et al. 2010a, b), impact of tempera- otes that include specialized chromosomal
ture (James 1937; Nelson-Rees 1960), and age of domains that are endowed with repetitive DNA
3 Cytogenetics 37

sequence specicities (e.g., centromeres, telo- for the study of genomic imprinting, operating at
meres, and nucleolar organizer regions). CH at the level of a gene and/or at a single chromosome
the molecular level is marked by distinctive or a whole chromosome set, wherein inactivation
structural changes incurred at the level of DNA of (1) one of the two X chromosomes in female
sequences, and with active participation of con- mammals and (2) a male haploid set of mealybug
stituent histones, and consequently upon its chro- chromosomes in a complement, serve as a unique
matin remodeling. In addition, recruitment of example for the consideration of epigenetic
HP1 (heterochromatin protein 1) at times serves phenomena.
as an essential ingredient of heterochromatin There is good evidence that the control of
structure. The interactions and dimerization transcription involves active participation of var-
activities of HP1 with that of DNA sequences, ious proteins which bind specically to methyl-
RNA, and histone moieties using appropriate ated DNA, wring in histone modication
combinations bring about repressive chromo- complexes, and eventually in local chromatin
somal complexes. This situation is thought to be remodeling processes.
widespread in many eukaryotic genomes and in Considering these features, the differential
some instances, this appears to be a conserved chromatin formation during the course of chro-
genome component lending its role appropriately mosome inactivation processes in the case of
from yeast to mammals (Nokayama et al. 2001; mammalian females and in the case of the pater-
Nielsen et al. 2001). The CH could also be diag- nal chromosomal set in male mealybugs repre-
nosed by highly methylated DNA sequences, sents a very clear case and an outstanding genetic
and/or histone modications that are enriched manifestation offered in the studies pertaining to
with, for example, methylated lysines an effort to understand the modes and methodol-
(H3K9Me3) and yet in depleted form in the case ogies involved during such processes (FH
of both H3K4Me3 and acetylated H4 (acH4). formation).
As the name implies, facultative heterochro- This exceptional situation offers immense
matin comes into force or effectiveness upon academic help in eliciting more on these topics;
their need to undertake any exigency purposes Lakhotia (2004) made efforts to shortlist achieve-
(such as gene regulatory activities). FH is a ments dwelling upon ongoing excitements that
euchromatic component but upon developmental prevail in the arena of epigenetical phenomena
cues acquires a highly compacted chromatin contributing towards the current phase of knowl-
structure to transform itself into an heterochro- edge available regarding heterochromatinization
matic comportment. In its native state, FH is progression. Several recent reviews have been
devoid of repetitive DNA sequences. Facultative forwarded detailing the prospects of mechanisms
heterochromatin differs from constitutive hetero- and functioning of various epigenetical programs
chromatin with respect to DNA sequence rear- that incorporate during gene regulatory activities
rangements but not at the nucleosomal level. At (Surani 1991; Li 2002; Cairns 2007; Kouzarides
the nucleosomal level, FH has many molecular 2007; Skiniotis et al. 2007; Bell and Spector
features similar to CH. From the pointing of its 2011). Of particular signicant and recent prog-
impaction among higher organisms and in cyto- ress are achievements heralded in the case of epi-
genetic context, FH affects only one of two genetic regulatory activities during genomic
homologous loci or homologous chromosomes, imprinting programming of the mammalian
or homologous chromosomal set. X-chromosome (Sado et al. 2005). On the other
Genomic imprinting is dened as a parent-of- hand, the present review focuses on recent
origin specic expression of selected or affected achievements made in our current understanding
gene(s), and has generally been associated with of the role of DNA methylation, histone modi-
specic changes in DNA methylation proles cations, and some points upon the chromatin
and in histone modication processes. Even remodeling processes pertaining to genomic
though there are numerous examples available analysis (e.g., Planococcus citri /P. lilacinus)
38 R. Sompalaym et al.

essentially based on chromosome organization of DNA methylation patterns. Vertebrate exam-


have been targeted to serve as a model genetic ples, on the other hand, have been shown as dem-
system. onstrating having acquired in the range of higher
levels of 5mC activities and were evidently docu-
mented, especially from among several higher
3.12.2 On Biochemical Paradigm animal examples. However, Bird (2002) is of the
opinion that it was not possible to corroborate
The regulation of gene expression plays a pivotal this situation to the same level of methylation
role in expediting complex phenotypes and in processes prevailing by 5Me between the verte-
differential expression patterns of epigenetic brate level to that of an insect system. The avail-
mechanisms, in which the role of DNA methyla- able data indicate varying levels of methylation
tion has been considered as playing an essential processes that do not seem to point out any con-
role in depiction of variable modes of operation served function. For example, the role of CpG
elicited during the course of chromosomal methylation as an epigenetic mark responsible
mechanics. In order to understand better the for genomic imprinting has been clearly estab-
functioning of DNA methylation processes is to lished in some mammalian examples (Feil and
learn more about its modes and methods and that Khosla 1999). Evidently, the case of human inac-
reect upon an operative course during distribu- tive X-chromosome in the female somatic chro-
tion patterns in the genome of interest. Cytosine mosomal complement serves as an ideal one for
DNA methylation has been demonstrated in sev- such kind of enquiry.
eral eukaryotic organisms and has been demon- On the other hand, the role of DNA methyla-
strated to play inquisitive roles in various tion in insects is still in its infancy. Thus, this
developmental activities. Variable portions of the situation could reect upon their leading a high
genomes are being subjected to the operative part diversity of life-cycle strategies prevailing from
of methylation with the help of 5-mehtylCytosine among individual cases pursued in each instance
(5mC) along the lengths of DNA sequence moi- for said purposes. The familiar one is the case of
ety. DNA methylation has been cited in numer- Drosophila melanogaster, in which DNA meth-
ous physiological functions depending on the ylation seems to be representing in an elusive
kind of model organisms utilized for said purpose way, because overall mechanisms prevail upon
and upon redesigning particular experimental developmental phases and more non-CpG meth-
protocols. Presence of DNA methylation in and ylation processes controlled by the role of Dnmt2.
around promoter regions is generally been In contrast, the case of Mamestra brassicae, a
thought to be associated with gene silencing pro- cabbage moth, based on HPLC analysis demon-
cesses and the loss of such kind of methylation strates the higher level of DNA methylation,
processes is reported to be accompanied by vir- which appears considerably closer to the stan-
tual transcriptional activation. dard level cited with respect to certain vertebrate
Several ideal examples can be cited inciting examples. Methylation experiments including
activities based on a methyl-transferase enzyme restriction enzymes as a parameter showed that
conglomerate that operates during such instances CpG sites were more spread out in the genome,
that have been profusely documented in several dispensing more towards the outer C of the
vertebrate and plant examples. In animals, the 5-CCGG-3sequences. However, results based
spectrum of methylation levels and patterns is on transposons are intriguing because mobile ele-
projected to reect upon a broader range and also ments are harboring and/ or congregating at or
indicate a highly variable mode of expression. proximal to repetitive sequences that seem heav-
Excepting cases such as Caenorhabditis elegans ily methylated, as was shown effectively in some
and Drosophila melanogaster, most invertebrate vertebrate and plant examples. However, a very
examples are reported in specicities reected in interesting case was that of Myzus persicae, a
indicating possession of a low to moderate level peach-potato aphid, wherein the enzyme systems
3 Cytogenetics 39

have been amplied drastically due to spurious to control the whole of the inactivation program
developmental activities of insecticide (E4 & (Cattanach 1974; Lyon 1999; Brown et al. 1991).
FE4) resistance genes and thus, forcing upon Characteristically, the mammalian inactive
detoxifying esterases that have been spurred up X-chromosome shows a typical characteristic
due to spurt in DNA methylation processes (Hick organization as scored by micrococceal
et al. 1996; Field et al. 2004). Overt expression endonuclease treatment, because transcriptional
patterns of CpG methylation in these cases might factors do (or can) not bind to its condensed
have reected upon the amplication events of domains (Pfeifer and Riggs 1991). On the other
the concerned genes, the situation of such kind hand, chromosomes play a different role in view
may be considered reecting upon the mechanics of the situation that coccoid genomes have
of methylation processes associated with the offered as a readily packed and amenable mate-
copious presence of DNA transposons as was rial of chromosome research in any cytogenetic
found necessary in the cases of several verte- and/or biochemical exploration activities.
brates and in transgene experiments carried out One of the unique features while characteriz-
in plants (Feil and Khosla 1999; Field 2000). ing genomes is to introduce an enhancing mecha-
The historic ndings of Schrader (1921, nistic driving so as to yield differential
1923b) and Hughes-Schrader (1948) in which organization of homologous chromosomal sets
male chromosomes were found to be character- dwelling in one point of reference which allows
ized by the presence of a haploid chromosomal one to pursue gratuitously such as, for example,
set acquiring precocious condensation property to pursue more upon the mechanisms of sex-
and thus, becoming inactive ones (in Lecanoids) determination, genomic imprinting processes,
or put into an ordeal of genomic elimination (in and into inactivation progression (Hughes-
Diaspidids) during the course of embryogenesis. Schrader 1948; Chandra and Brown 1975;
Brown and Nelson-Rees (1961) described such Peterson and Sapienza 1993). For example, the
an event occurring by elaborating on chromo- mealybug genome is unique because it is in pos-
somal mechanics imposed upon heterochromatic session of unusual chromosomal characteristics,
components by means of undergoing a faculta- involving diffuse centromeric organization
tively heterochromatinization program. (holokinetic activity) that encompasses inverse
The condensation property of the paternal meiotic processes, leading to a signaling of an
chromosomal set of mealybug chromosomes is unorthodox mode of cell-cycle manipulation in
correlated in parallel with the expression for males (Hughes-Schrader and Ris 1941; Brown
maleness. In mealybugs and other coccoids, and Nur 1964; Nur 1990). Thus, some of these
radiation-induced chromosomal fragments are unusual genetic bounties could have driven
not lost during mitosis but persist as stable enti- Chandra and his collaborators in attempting and
ties in nuclei of both sexes, demonstrating that exploring further these genomic contents (e.g., P.
the centromere is diffuse and that freshly broken lilacinus or P. citri) at the DNA sequence level
chromosomal ends can still form telomeres or and of modied version of bases in the DNA
telomerelike structures and regulate associated sequence organization.
functions (Brown and Nelson-Rees 1961; Employing appropriate but standardized bio-
Chandra 1963a). When broken chromosomes chemical protocols (Jamaluddin et al. 1979;
were transmitted by fathers to their sons, each Achwal and Chandra 1982; Achwal et al. 1983,
chromosomal fragment underwent heterochro- 1984; Karnik 1983; Deobagkar et al. 1982, 1986)
matization progression suggesting the presence have enabled their fruitful extraction of total
of multiple centers of chromosome inactivation. nuclear DNA content based on an Indian
This situation contrasts with the condensation Planococcus genome. These assays were utilized
property exhibited in mammalian females, for the purposes of studying the primary nature of
wherein the inactive X-chromosome is identi- methylation status by means of HPLC and chro-
able with a single center of activity and is thought matography which enabled disclosing the pres-
40 R. Sompalaym et al.

ence of signicantly higher amounts of 5-methyl methylation processes and were found to occur
cytosines in some portions of the genome. This about 2.5 times more frequently than those show-
was veried by dinucleotide analysis in which ing female specic methylation sequences.
5-mC seemed over represented with respect to Bisulphite modied DNA samples revealed an
other sequences (viz., CpA, CpT, CpC). interspersion of CpG and non-CpG methylation
Unusually higher amounts of 6-mAdinosine among sex-specic methylated sequences. This
(6-mA), 7-mGuanosine (7-mG) were also study also pointed out that there were more non-
encountered (Deobagkar et al. 1982). Achwal CpG methylates and/or at least twice as many
et al. (1983) reported a new protocol to isolate sex-specic methylated sequences found in
and characterize antibodies raised specically to males than in females. They thus based on those
5-mC, 6-mA, and 7-mG, a situation rarely found sequences that there could be offering a closer
in higher eukaryotes at that time. With the use of association between sex-specic methylated
immunobiochemical approaches they were able sequences located in transcriptionally silent chro-
to evaluate the samples to the same level of con- matin zones and those assays resistant to DNase I
tention to that of higher eukaryotic samples (viz., zones.
Drosophila, Human, etc.). Scarbrough et al. (1984) studies were based
Devajyothi and Brahmachari (1989, 1992) on the differential levels of 5-mC in the males
present evidence of obtaining homogeneous and females of Pseudococcus calceolariae and P.
extraction of DNA-methyl transferase enzyme obscurus and thus they were able to relate their
that were found specic to the test material ndings and that these results driving them to
(Planococcus citri/ P.lilacinus). The enzyme arrive at conclusions that males display higher
extracts exhibited a proactive mode of action and incidences of methylated sequences than those of
found preference for salt extraction techniques, female samples. Kantheti (1994) describes, with
because that appeared equivalent to routine the help of specic antibodies raised against
extraction protocols utilized in the case of mam- 5-mC, that there were more 5-mC localization
malian methylase assays. These results demon- spots identiable on male cells than on female
strate that the enzyme assays have had high ones in the case of P. lilacinus. There were also
specicities for denatured DNA substrates. two more studies reported on Planococcus citri
Mohan et al. (2002) using random stretches of P. (Bongiorni et al. 1999; and Buglia et al. 1999)
lilacinus DNA sequences, the technique of which whose genomic exploration of P. citri samples
was found to be helpful in delineating repetitive related to the prevalence of sex-specic cytosine
sequence analyses that were inferred as higher specicities but arrived at conicting inferences.
than those of other conventional sequences and Khosla et al. (1996) present evidence suggest-
were also found much higher than those of ing existence of specic DNA fragments that
Drosophila samples scrutinized and compared were perhaps offering to serve as a primary sig-
wherein GCs were found less frequent. Thus, nal during the elaborate mechanism as a contrib-
they infer based on this situation that seemed uting factor towards chromosomal imprinting
promising for the considerations upon inuenc- activities. Chromatin organization of Planococcus
ing on CpG dinucleotide sequence frequencies lilacinus was chosen for the purpose of extrapo-
which was found exclusively in those genomic lating rather than to consider offering as contrib-
samples. Methylation specic arbitararily primed utory factors to their functional spectrum.
(MS-AP), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and Digestion of P. lilacinus samples with micrococ-
subtraction hybridization protocols were found cal nucleases showed 35 % of the male genome
helpful to Mohan and Chandra (2005) and thus to samples were different and the same were
describe the isolation and sequencing of sex- assayed and found to be more resistant to the
specic CpG methylation sequences that were introduction of enzymatic activities; as such
prevalent in genomic DNA samples of P. lilaci- these samples were designated nuclease resistant
nus. These sequences showed male specic chromatins (NRCs) fractions. This component
3 Cytogenetics 41

was present invariably in both sexes and through- towards processing of the heterochromatization
out the genome. However, cloned NRC DNA program. It was also felt that some nrc51 frac-
contained A + T rich sequences that were found tions were not accessible to MNases even in
revealing some homology towards that of sam- euchromatic chromosomes. For the same they
ples of mouse - satellites. Salt fractionation offer the suggestion that these sequences might
techniques revealed that these sequences were have been inferred to contribute towards
found to be matrix-associated. Based on these centromeric-type activity; instead, they were
experiments, they were tempted to offer some found to be dispensed with all along the length of
solutions in the form of those DNA sequences the chromosomes. It was well known that a sin-
present explicitly in NRC fractions and it was gle inactivation center exists in the case of the
possible to infer that this sample would serve as a mammalian inactive X-chromosome, in contrast
resource material for a future course of genetic to the situation prevailing in the mealybug chro-
studies. Thus, Khosla et al. (1996) ndings thus mosomes exhibiting multiple centers along the
are directed towards offering these parameters length of individual chromosomes that serve as a
that could as well be serving as a mode of strategy model system for the chromosomal inactivation
and further to consider them as putative centers program. In the light of these ndings, these are
for initiation of facultative heterochromatization the distribution specicities for nrc50 and nrc-
processes. However, they also cautioned that there 51fractions over the mealybug chromosome sam-
are other contributory factors that they might ples and considering them for their presence in
interact with this grand executive operation. In the the form of several heterogeneous NRCDNA
meanwhile a thorough scrutinization is necessary fragments and of enrichment within the unusu-
and required in an extensive way prior to arriving ally organized chromatins of the male would
at any kind of generalization in this regard. raise the possibility of examining them and per-
With the help of southern hybridization and haps serving as putative nuclear sequence loci in
FISH techniques, Khosla et al. (1999) provide the form of expression of multiple inactivation
results proclaiming the extrapolation of NRCs centers.
and further about prevalence of subdivisions of Extending these experiments as an extrapola-
these fractions in the form of two middle repeti- tion undertaken by Khosla et al. (1999), they pro-
tive sequences, designated as nrc50 and nrc51 vide descriptions based on their explicit pattern
samples. It was also found that they were differ- of expression of this unusual chromatin organiza-
entially organized within NRC composition and tion designated as NRC fractions during the
more interestingly they have enabled distinguish- course of cytologically identiable regions and
ing the sexes based on the placement of differen- during spermatogenesis and especially over
tial proximity. The NRCs were also found sperm nuclei even though their expression was
resistant to both MNase and DNAase I treatment on a maternal background. Furthermore, it was
and thereby enable exhibiting indistinct patterns made possible for them to infer that this compo-
that may help in identifying two sexes. Their nent can perpetuate through mitotic and meiotic
enrichment in NRC accounted to contain 50 and progression.
83 % for nrc50 and nrc51 type, respectively. It also appeared interesting that differential
Thus, 2530 % of samples remain resistant in chromatin organization forms procured from the
males but none in females. It has been shown samples of the mealybug (Planococcus lilacinus)
consistently that NRC is associated with the provide an important biochemical tool in consid-
nuclear matrix. On a nuclear matrix isolation eration of assessing and identifying maleness or
platform regarding male and female sample femaleness based on the presence or absence of
nuclei, it was found evident that the NRC frac- NRCs from the total genomic organization. Thus,
tions were present only in males but not in based on this important biochemical discovery, it
females. They further imply that it is the pater- was made possible for Khosla et al. (2006) to
nally derived hypomethylation set that drives hypothesize and suggest a biochemical model
42 R. Sompalaym et al.

that may be able to answer some of the vexing 3.12.3 Molecular Cytogenetics
problems confronted by geneticists included dur-
ing the course of understanding genomic imprint- HP-1 (Heterochromatin Protein-1) is a nonhis-
ing mechanics. They are of the opinion that by tone chromosomal protein with two highly con-
regulating NRC as a discriminating organization served domains. The amino terminal
in the paternal/maternal genome, it becomes pos- chromodomain (CD) has the capacity to bind
sible to discriminate male- oriented cells from either mono-, di-, or tri-methylated histone moi-
those of females while attempting to recognize ety (e.g., lysines) of H3 or H4 or others. The car-
facultatively heterochromatinized chromatin boxy terminal chromoshadow (CS) domains
organization in one or the other sex. At this junc- are involved in mediating protein protein inter-
ture, their inference was to ascribe that in the pre- actions (Eissenberg and Elgin 2000; Lachner
ceding zygote formation, the zygote is in et al. 2001). Historically, HP-1 was identied and
possession of the paternal genome in the form of isolated originally based on Drosophila melano-
the NRC positive state and as such, the status of gaster polytene chromosome heterochromatin
heterochromatin is in the form of negative effect. regions and subsequently, were procured from
Subsequent to sixth cleavage divisions, the said several other sources and from several other
NRC-positive paternal genome acquires hetero- organisms, considering these format posed us as
chromatization status based on the developmen- the basis for isolation and they were acquainted
tal decision made at some point in the ooplasm, through to the cloning experiments. By raising
in order to acquire a decision either to procure or antibody (CIA 9) against those subdivisions of
lose heterochromatin mediating proteins, thereby several homologues were procured. HP-1 are
acquiring a specic functional role based on a highly conserved and play a role in gene silenc-
NRC-positive or negative fraction. ing efforts in a diverse range of organisms (Singh
Subsequently, Mathur et al. (2010) present a and Georgatos, 2002). There appear to have been
genomic organization of another pseudococcid, instances wherein euchromatic zones require
Maconellicoccus hirsutus, thereby evaluating the HP-1 s for stabilization of their elongating tran-
obvious presence of the effective NRC fraction scripts (Vakoc et al. 2005).
and its mode of association with that of nuclear Epstein et al. (1992) were keen on extrapolat-
histone matrix content. They insist based on pre- ing the molecular biology of HP-1 and their ef-
vious experience that the afnity patterns ciency towards cloning and thus isolated several
between NRC and histone matrix form an impor- patterns of expression from Drosophila HP-1
tant binding property for a meaningful differen- homologues and the same were used to compare
tial expression especially eliciting developmental with samples drawn from several other sources
courses promoting the paternal mode of inheri- wherein their genomes were known towards
tance. The exhaustive study revealed by means of exhibiting heterochromatin programs in which
extraction and the identication of H3K27Me3, the role of HP-1 takes dominance. Because they
H4K20Me3, and H3K9Me3 proteins in both in knew that the degree of similarity between chro-
male- and in female-based samples and with a modomains (of polycomb) and HP-1 at the
signicant enrichment of H3K27M3 in the nucleic acid level it was found sufcient to detect
nuclear matrix of males compared to that of and isolate other genes from other organisms
females form an important and critical contribu- using low-stringency nucleic acid hybridization
tion. This particular biochemical component (Singh et al. 1991). Epstein et al. (1992) were
seems pointing towards and directing a cell-based exploring the possibilities of procuring HP-1
signal for a male sex-specic discriminating fac- homologues from several other sources; however,
tor. Furthermore, the analysis of cytologically they preferred to examine HP-1 s from mealybug
sorted nuclei indicates the presence of NRC in genomes because it was well-known that these
nuclei with different DNA content including the scale insect provide a robust example for such kind
haploid nuclei from males, is another interesting of consideration and thus may serve as a suit-
phenomenon disclosed in this genome. able target (Hughes-Schrader 1948; Nur 1990).
3 Cytogenetics 43

Thus, the coccoid genetic system is well recog- chromatin suppression. An extension of such
nized as one of the rst examples to pursue for kind of exploration made on the mealybug
examining parent-of-origin (parental imprinting) genome (P. citri) was represented and shown by
specic effects; subsequently, other examples intense staining of DAPI; but male cells were
were perused for said purposes including humans highlighted by discrete staining localization
(Solter 1998). But Epstein et al. (1992) were able rather than that of interphase nuclei. Only ecks
to describe their attempts by means of molecular of stainability marks were found over the euchro-
characterization of two chromodomain- matic portions, but the representation at the male
containing proteins called PCHET-1 and prometaphase stage was by and large very clear
PCHET-2 (for putative coccid heterochromatin (Cowell et al. 2002). Thus, they made an asser-
proteins 1 and 2), from the mealybug genome, tion towards this effect that the role played by the
Planococcus citri. They were able to prepare HP-1 protein in silencing of concerned genes is
cDNA encoding these proteins realized in clon- thought to be a conserved function (Nokayama
ing and in which it was shown that PCHET-1 et al. 2001; Nielsen et al. 2001).
seemed to have more potential than that of Recent studies on methylated histones have
PCHET-2. This fusion product was later utilized revealed that the level of methylation of the spe-
for exploring the expression patterns of cic lysines may have an important functional
PCHET-1 in other mealybug tissues and it was consequence for the assembly of heterochroma-
conrmed that it assisted in a male tissue-specic tin formation. Acetylation and methylation are
manner. However,, the specicities of tissue dis- the two types of post-transcriptional modica-
tribution of this protein may suggest the most tions known that have been identied in histones
sought after gene, but it was not at the level of (Wu et al. 1986). The histone code is a sugges-
correlating to the extent of identifying the male- tion made in which covalent modications may
specic heterochromatic chromosomal set. be brought about by the kind and mode of the
Moreover, PCHET-1 was not found traceable on participation of chromosomal proteins and as
female cells. Thus, they opine that PCHET-1 in such, a modication will have effects on driving
combination with other factors may help in pro- towards tissue-specic expression patterns.
viding a role for the sex-determination device. Kourmouli et al. (2004) have made observations
Many decades of concentrated work on het- that on the N-terminal tails of lysine 20 of H4, it
erochromatization in terms of cytological and is trimethylation of this lysine that occurs; but if
molecular characterization reveal that this chro- it is dimethylation of lysines it was shown to be
mosomal component (whether constitutive or associated with euchromatic portions of the
facultative) consists based on a macromolecular genomes (Fang et al. 2002; Kourmouli et al.
mould in the form of a repressive chromatin com- 2004). Furthermore, Kourmouli et al. (2004)
plex (Spofford 1976). It is well known that meth- have reported that in the murine examples, the
ylation of lysine 9 of H3 by Suv (3)9 methyl trimethylated lysine 20 of H4 (but not the Me(2)
transferase creates a binding site for HP-1 (CD) K20H4) establish specic relationships in the
resulting in the formation of a repressive protein presence of Suv(3)9 histone methyl transferase
complex; since it was considered the most robust activity, with that of Me(3)K9H3 thereby
histone modications known. accounting for epigenetic crosstalk between H3
While attempting to elicit mutual relation- and H4. Extension of such kind of study revealed
ships existing between heterochromatin, HP-1, that in the coccoid examples analyzed as a target
and trimethylated lysine 9 of H3 (Me(3)K9H3) as for action it was expounded that its expressivity
a requirement in analyzing X-chromosome inac- was observed on the facultative heterochroma-
tivation program is resolvable us in the mamma- tized paternal chromosomal set. They made a
lian examples including humans, Cowell et al. detailed assessment of this situation by means of
(2002) observed that there were elevated levels DAPI stainings where the heterochromatic
of trimethylation at the notied sites resulting in component forms a brightly stained property
44 R. Sompalaym et al.

(Epstein et al. 1992; Bongiorni et al. 2001; geted for such an exploration in order to delineate
Kourmouli et al. 2004). In the female mealybug chromosomal differences, especially pointing out
cells, Me(3)K20H4 is found scattered uniformly DNA sequences pertaining to differences occur-
throughout the chromosomal set. ring at the organizational level, to the extent of
Most imprinted loci may have key regulatory identifying methylated and nonmethylated
elements that are methylated on one of the paren- chromosomes.
tal chromosomes. For several of these differen- Bongiorni et al. (1999) have made a detailed
tially methylated regions, recent studies establish account of the structural organization in respect
that the unmethylated chromosome has a special- to both males and females, and the paternal
ized chromatin organization that is characterized derived haploid set was found to be
by nuclease hypersensitivity. In such a situation, hypomehtylated to that of the maternally derived
the question is raised as to whether associated chromosome. In males it is the paternally derived
chromatin features regulate the allele specicity hypomethylated haploid set that is heterochroma-
of DNA methylation at those imprinting control tized. To their surprise, in female embryos, half
regions. of the chromosomal complement was under-
Taking cognizance of a lead from the bio- methylated and thus, they inferred that the under-
chemical front that was well demonstrated from methylated chromosomal set in females
the reports of Scarbrough et al. (1984) and represented was of paternal origin, emphasizing
Devajyothi and Brahmachari (1992) and its rele- that DNA methylation could be at the basis of
vance to the possibility of establishing preva- imprinting phenomena at the chromosomal level.
lence of relationships between two states, DNA Thus they suggest that the two haploid sets are
methylation processes and chromosome imprint- imprinted by parental-of-origin-specic DNA
ing phenomena in the coccoid genetic system is a methylation with no correlation with the known
jerk in our understanding of chromosome gene silencing properties of the base
imprinting phenomena and is considered monu- modication.
mental in coccoid genetic research. In order to In their next venture (Bongiorni et al. 2001),
probe further this important component of scale they carried out experiments based on western
insects, Prantera and his team (2012) have initi- blotting and immunolocalization with uorescent
ated unearthing several molecular cytogenetic microscope-level observations upon mealybug
complexities. Following is a descriptive account genome P. citri. Their intuition was to identify a
of their research accomplishments. cross-reactive protein epilope whose properties
In order to probe and enlighten based upon suggest that of a homologue of Drosophila HP-1,
implications of molecular and chromosomal present in this species. By analyzing the distribu-
level investigations undertaken by Bongiorni tion patterns upon immunouorescence spottings
et al. (1999) who made a beginning towards they could infer the distribution of this HP-1-like
prevalence of procuring knowledge of the P. citri protein in male and female cells during the cell
genome of Italian origin. They utilized the RE/ cycle and in the early embryogenesis. It was evi-
NT technique (restriction enzyme directed in situ dent to point out this (HP-1-like) protein colocal-
nick translation) upon exploring of DNA izes with male-specic heterochromatin, thereby
sequence-level organization, thereby extrapolat- implying that this protein plays a role in the pro-
ing the P. citri chromosome (Ferraro et al. 2001). cess of facultative heterochromatization.
Concentrating specically based on MSPI and its However, they allay some doubts as to the
methyl-sensitive isoschizomer HPa II when used nature of the presence of P. citri HP-1-like pro-
as nicking agents, led them to make incisions into tein in embryos of both sexes which had led them
the genome by exposing organizational differ- to infer a protein factor was involved in the rec-
ences prevailing between homologous chromo- ognition of the imprint signal, suggesting that at
somes and subchromosomal regions (Prantera least there could be another factor provision
and Ferraro 1990). The P. citri genome was tar- which was found to be involved in the induction
3 Cytogenetics 45

of facultative heterochromatization and thus this exclusion of the heterochromatic chromosomes


factor should be male-limited in characteristics. from genetic continuum.
Moreover, as to the nature of C-banding staining, Earlier experience was driven to understand
it was not a strict cytological correlative measure that the HP-2 protein, a homologous HP-1 part-
to assign any heterochromatic role. It is well ner acquired from the D. melanogaster genome,
known that C-bands always coincide with consti- acts as a dominant suppressor of PEV, therefore
tutive heterochromatic composition. demonstrating a role involved in the structure
In their next exploration of coccoid chromo- and maintenance of heterochromatin structural
some systems, Bongiorni et al. (2004) concen- integrity. Implying the foregoing concept, Volpi
trated on detailing the inverted meiotic cycle et al. (2007) wanted to probe more of its effec-
established by means of indirect immune- tiveness upon the mealybug (P. citri) genome.
uorescent tapping. This issue drew special fea- With the help of an antibody raised against
tures because P. citri genetics revolves around Drosophila HP homologue epilope samples, they
diffuse centromeres and inverted meiosis. This acquired the set that was able to present cross-
study also focused specically on second meiotic reactive epilope and thus they designated the
division in which the male cell-cycle was mani- product as an Hp-2-like protein. Following the
cured by monopolar spindle activities and as a life-cycle patterns through to the male phase of
part of this special system, they dwelled more on the mealybugs revealed that they became with
the mode of meiotic drive enforced upon this acquainted with a heterochromatinized chromo-
genetic system. They were more interested and some set containing the requisite amount of anti-
engrossed on interpretation of meiotic spindle body deposition that was estimated by
activity in which the cytological preparations immunouorescent scanning. During the obser-
made were based on the use of an antibody that vations of the euchromatic chromosomes, HP-2-
was directed against insect tubulin. like impressions were sometimes traceable over
Earlier, Hughes-Schrader (1948) suggested the telomeric regions. The interplay between
the prevalence of monopolar spindle during male HP-2-like and HP-1 was critically examined
meiosis and interpreted that heterochromatic based on the introduction of ds RNAi experi-
chromosomes are the ones participating in such ments. Knocking out HP-1-like protein expres-
kind of activity. However, based on the introduc- sion with the introduction of the RNAi method
tion of recent protocols (Bongiorni et al. 2004) did not prevent the association of HP-2-like with
upon P. citri meiosis revealed that the spindle is facultative heterochromatization, thereby endorsing
associated with the euchromatic set facilitated by that the latter and its presence by binding to chro-
enhanced staining by DAPI that distinguishes matin is independent. They also utilized that this
each set by differential uorescent stainability. property extended to the processes of condensa-
The monopolar spindle could originate either tion or decondensation upon other cell types.
from a lack of centromeric duplication or from It is now certain that the HP-2-like protein
the lack of separation of duplicated centrosomes. binding to chromatin is a perquisite for faculta-
These authors were of the view that the formation tive heterochromatization assembly and it indeed
of a monopolar spindle and the lack of microtu- poses an interesting possibility that this compo-
bule binding by heterochromatic chromosomes nent must be tested by inactivation of HP-2-like.
are a necessary condition to ensure the noninde- Hp-2 antibody signals aggregate over distinct
pendent segregation of homologous chromo- chromatin areas, which identify the future chro-
somal sets at the second meiotic division. The mocenters after they have already been bound by
nonindependent assortment at the reductional HP-1-like. This suggests that the recruitment of
division together with the degeneration of the HP-2-like to the potential heterochromatic
heterochromatic spermatid nuclei formulate a domains depends on the presence of HP-1-like.
basis of the strong meiotic drive that leads to In adult tissues, where the heterochromatization
46 R. Sompalaym et al.

reversal occurs, the HP-2-like epitope is lost by lagging, abnormal condensation, segregation
the chromocenter remnants before the HP-1-like, defects), more so on structural maintenance com-
which thus seems to be insufcient to anchor ponents (SMCs).
HP-2-like to chromatin. It has also become evi-
dent that the strict colocalization of HP-2-like
with the chromocenter is not abolished in HP-1- 3.12.4 Chromatin Remodeling
like knockout embryos.
Molecular results based on some mammalian In many diverse organisms, gamete formation
examples, also including the mealybug genome, originates in a cytoplasmic, but highly conserved
were obtained independently by Kourmouli et al. structure, known as germ-line cysts. Germ-line
(2004) and Schotta et al. (2004) in an experiment cysts (or saclike structures) are composed of a
to certify the effect that Me(3)K9H3 employing group of cells; it is apparent that they took their
Me(3)K20H4 through the participation of HP-1 initiation from a single cell that underwent syn-
promoting heterochromatin formation appears to chronous cell divisions followed by incomplete
be a global-level event. But what was not clear cytokinesis. Modication of the chromatin struc-
about this was how HP-1 modulation is involved ture is one of the main epigenetic regulations con-
during gene activation processes in the case of ceived to carry out its operation in order to
the mealybug genome (P. citri; Bongiorni and undertake unique gene expression modalities. The
Prantera 2003; Bongiorni et al. 2007; Kourmouli male germ-line cyst is the organ that facilitates
et al. 2004). In contrast, acetylation of histone H4 executing the meiotic and/or post-meiotic mode
(AcH4) was found to be absent on the male- of gene regulation activity sharing during gameto-
specic heterochromatization processes (Ferraro genesis. The germ-line cyst morphogenesis
et al. 2001), whereas the depleted level of activa- acquires the responsibility of delivering the
tion of AcH4 was observed in the case of human respective genomic content to their destined sites.
X-chromosome inactivation (Jeppesen and Male meiosis of scale insects is interesting
Turner 1993). The foregoing issues have driven because meiotic sequence progressions proceed
to an understanding with a suggestion that Me(3) in accordance with those of inverse meiosis.
K9H3 via HP-1 to the Me(3)K20H4 pathway in Thus, during male meiosis each spermatogonial
an evolutionarily conserved mechanism of action precursor cell nucleus produces a bunch of syn-
for an epigenetic route to silencing large chromo- chronously dividing spermatogonia in a cytoplas-
somal domains by facultative heterochromatiza- mic cyst. Each spermatogonium divides four
tion (Chadwick and Willard 2004). times to produce a cyst of 16 primary spermato-
While establishing the prevalence of Me(3) cytes which then undergo two meiotic divisions.
K9H3 to HP-1to Me(3)K20H4 relationships in the Subsequently, each spermatogonium undergoes
case of P. citri genomes, Bongiorni et al. (2007) the rst equational and then the second reduction
proceeded further to interrelate the position of the division, which is characterized by specialized
HP-2-like protein (PCHET-2) based on RNAi movements directed and dictated by some
experiments. With the intermediation of ds RNAi unknown sources. But recent studies undertaken
(Fire et al. 1998) and by interference of knocking by Buglia and Ferraro (2004), Buglia et al.
down PCHET-2 in P. citri embryos, it was resolved (2009), and Bongiorni et al. (2009) have pro-
that the consequential depletion of the heterochro- vided some clues to learn more about the extent
matization pathway resulted in deheterochromati- and nature of expression, wherein these chromo-
zation with respect to gut cells and Malpighian somal movements were maintained and manipu-
tubules, whereas Hp-1 and Me(3)K20H4 in the lated by the monopolar spindle in which
same nuclei are either dispersed or absent. microtubules make physical connection with the
Embryos treated with ds RNAi (double-stranded euchromosomal set, rather than with the hetero-
RNA interference) targeting PCHET-2 also exhibit chromatic component as was contended earlier
chromosomal abnormalities (such as chromosome by Hughes-Schrader (1948). Even though Sciara
3 Cytogenetics 47

chromosomes practice monopolar spindle activi- H4K20Me3. This was found to be a consistent
ties, it seemed to be maintained through the expression pattern until the spermatid formation,
occurrence of monokinetic activity wherein mei- thereby demonstrating the supremacy of histone
otic products were manicured by sister-chromatid modications throughout the male part of the
cohesion (Esteban et al. 1997). meiosis. This situation is in congruence with that
By utilizing antibody-specic tracings, Buglia of Khosla et al. (1999, 2006) observations and of
and Ferraro (2004) describe an immunouores- their proposals advocating the presence of NRCs
cent staining protocol backed by enhanced active on paternal cell lineage until sperm maturation.
participation of fusomal elements, such as By now, it seems evident by pointing out that by
F-actin, included in the elaborate descriptions of the end of spermatogenesis PCHET-2 may be
factors that demarcate local morphogenesis losing its grip. Bongiorni et al. (2009) contend
essentially demarcating the cytoplasmic compo- that the presence and supremacy of H3K9Me2 &
sition of the male germ-line cysts. The co- 3 methylation processes dominate throughout the
localization of all these factors is an indication of course of gametogenesis, and with respect to the
the triggering action that could be measured by content of these proteins, they are in disagree-
densitometric proles which further enable in ment with the contention of Buglia and Ferraros
providing descriptions about the prevalence of (2004) observations. This pertains to the quan-
two kinds of sperms emerging but equipped with tum of differential distributions regarding
variable loads with respect to individual sperm euchromatic spermatids, because these products
content. take their origin from a single meiotic event.
A continuing search by Bongiorni et al. (2009) However, Buglia and Ferraro (2004) strongly
proceeded towards extrapolating procurement of dene that values they procured were essentially
the resources to be used during the gametoge- based on densitometric tracings, citing differing
netic processes and seemed to be in possession values with respect to H3K9Me2 & 3 and of
until early embryonic development. CIA9.
Immunolabeling of such components in order to In their subsequent study, Buglia et al. (2009)
probe has enabled identifying the presence of have elaborated mustering of resources pertain-
protein components such as H3K9Me2 & 3, ing to the development of female phases of
H4K20Me3, HP-2, and PCHET-2-like, that were gametogenesis of P. citri. Their results provide
concentrated in the paternal part of the meiotic the presence of a proteic component; this time the
stages throughout, but not in the female line to presence of HP1 and Su (var) 39 (a different
the extent of oocyte formation. On the other chromosomal protein), makes all the more impor-
hand, there were no traces of these modiers in tant contributions occurring during female gam-
the female gametogenesis. The redistribution of ete formation. Pertaining to the deposition of
epigenetic signaling marks in spermatids might variable contents of eggs it was found to contain
be related in the tracings of the processes con- two different kinds of cell inclusions, deposited
cerned with the establishment of parental imprint- in eggs, thereby categorizing in such a way as to
ing. Bongiorni et al. (2009) narrate the modes of act differently upon different ages of females.
operation through to the entry of sperm into the Based on these biochemical characteristics,
oocyte environment, where they are in posses- females with 40-days older age were considered
sion of distinct H3K9Me2 and 3 methylation as a younger group and those of 80-days old as an
marks that were found in the early pronucleus. older (aged) group. The ndings of larger
Observations were made of such kind of effect amounts of epigenetic factors accumulated in the
during the course of spermatogenesis indicating group of aged females in comparison to the
the presence in the form of heterochromatic com- younger ones was found to be an important
ponents decorated by H3K9Me2 & 3 and deciding factor. These studies have led to the
PCHET-2. Regarding the euchromatic compo- supposition of playing as a primary role based on
nent, it was shown containing HP-2-like and differential maternal contribution.
48 R. Sompalaym et al.

It was observed that the concept of genomic lated that the role of the mothers cytoplasmic
imprinting phenomena seemed to be lending environment might have been inicted by impo-
effective support in the cases of both Sciara and sition of environmental disturbances. Thus, dur-
coccoids, that the primary sex determination ing routine life-style courses, a one-to-one ratio
mechanism relied upon considering conse- in the case of sexually reproducing and one-to-
quences of occurrence of chromosome imprint- none in the case of parthenogenetic system, the
ing (Chandra and Brown 1975; Brown and sex ratio will operate in an expected line.
Chandra 1977). It also appears obvious in the However, if any change is incurred with respect
case of mealybugs, that possibly it was at the to the sex ratio it could possibly be envisioned
instance of mothers that enable directing and dis- and perceived as operating under constraints due
criminating the sex of her offspring. In addition, to the external forces that thrust upon maternal
the extension of this provision should yield environmental cues.
mechanistic support to the concept that mater- Currently, the mechanism of the genomic
nally controlled sex determination could also imprinting phenomenon is still unclear although
give way or leverage for control of the progeny the role of PCHET-2 and histone modications
sex ratio. Earlier, Nelson-Rees (1960) had con- seems evidently involved in effecting the faculta-
tended that the sex ratio in mealybugs uctuates tive heterochromatization process in the case of
among females and is markedly inuenced by the mealybug genome (P. citri). Females may
mothers age at conception towards the brood. In volunteer and might offer to alter the concentra-
both sexually reproducing and in parthenogenetic tion of those proteins in their eggs to their con-
mode of reproduction, the imprinting process ini- tention so as to modulate the sex ratio of their
tiates at and in the egg cytoplasm at the time of broods. Along this line, Buglia and Ferraro
the fertilization program. (2004) and Buglia et al. (2009) observations
Parental genomic inuences on the fate of off- point towards the situation that under the varied
spring development are evident in both inverte- concentration of CIA9-based positively stained
brate and vertebrates. Maternal effects are protein and of those of observations pertaining to
commonly mediated through deposition of the the eggs of females possessing variable amounts
cytoplasmic transcripts essaying protein products of proteins and at variable ages prior to mating
in oocytes during oogenesis in the female germ- should bring forth more differences in the egg
line. These then exert their effects on the fertil- chamber. They also apprise that females would
ized eggs and drive impulses upon early produce male-biased offspring whereas the oppo-
embryonic developmental processes (De Robertis site effect of maternal aging prior to mating was
et al. 2000; Gosden 2002), unlike some mamma- also observed in other studies.
lian examples that may provide guidelines for Prantera and Bongiorni (2012) postulated that
any kind of eventuality (Li et al. 2008). However, the embryonic cytoplasm at the blastoderm stage
there are no specic studies undertaken pertain- determines whether the paternal chromosomes,
ing to the operating mechanisms responsible for which are marked by DNA hypomethylation and
maintenance of genomic methylation imprints, H3K9me3 methylation marks, could be able to
even though the P. citri genome may serve as drive towards undergoing heterochromatization
very good material for such kind of expeditions. processes or not, and thereby giving rise to a
In view of this trepidation, it is possible to male or female embryo, respectively. Given the
infer that the mother can embark upon an initia- causative role and presence of PCHET-2 on
tion or directing a particular path towards the male-specic heterochromatin formation and
choice of her offspring and its bestowing effec- also based on the amount of PCHET-2 in the
tiveness on the sex-ratio potential. In promulgat- developing embryo, may prefer it as a crucial
ing the imprinting phenomenon, in terms of factor to drive the embryo either towards male-
evolutionary consequences with reference to a ness or femaleness. It is already envisioned that
choice-based progeny sex ratio, it was also postu- the effectiveness of facultative heterochromatini-
3 Cytogenetics 49

zation makes its presence in the seventh cleavage References


division onwards regarding male embryos and
moving in the form of a wave from one pole Achwal CW, Chandra HS (1982) A sensitive immuno-
chemical method for detection of 5mC in DNA frag-
towards the other, suggesting a graded distribu- ments. FEBS Lett 150:469472
tion on the part of PCHET-2. Inasmuch as Achwal CW, Iyer CA, Chandra HS (1983)
PCHET-2 could not possibly be observed either Immunochemical evidence for the presence of 5mC,
in sperm or in ooplasm, its presence only in the 6mC and 7mG in human, Drosophila and mealybug
DNA. FEBS Lett 158:353358
embryo should be at the courtesy of an early de Achwal CW, Ganguly P, Chandra HS (1984) Estimation
novo synthesis under the control of above-said of the amount of 5 methylcytosine in Drosophila
maternal factors. melanogaster by photoacoustic spectroscopy. EMBO
Investigations pertaining to nding answers to J 3(2):263266
Baer D (1965) Asynchronous replication of DNA in a het-
several questions have been raised and are still erochromatic set of chromosomes in Pseudococcus
pending for clarity with respect to our current obscurus. Genetics 52:275285
understanding of mealybug genomes and of their Bell JT, Spector TD (2011) A twin approach to unraveling
possibly related roles in expression patterns of epigenetic. Trends Genet 27(3):116125
Bird A (2002) DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic
chromosomal facultative heterochromatization memory. Genes Dev 16:621
(inactivation) processes. However, the molecular Bongiorni S, Prantera G (2003) Imprinted facultative het-
and cytogenetic data acquired by both the Indian erochromatization in mealybugs. Genetica
and the Italian investigators offer us highly com- 117:271279
Bongiorni S, Cintio O, Prantera G (1999) The relationship
mendable efforts since these contributions have between DNA methylation and chromosome imprint-
driven towards arriving at a mutual interest in the ing in the Coccid Planococcus citri. Genetics
form of a common platform of subjective 151:14711478
comprehension. Bongiorni S, Pasqualini B, Taranta M, Singh B, Prantera
G (2007) Epigenetic regulation of facultative hetero-
As part of a supposition made by Prantera and chromatinization in Planococcus citri via the Me(3)
Bongiorni (2012) and with those of the Khosla K9H3-HP1-Me(3)K20H4 pathway. J Cell Sci
et al. (2006) and Mathur et al. (2010) opinion that 120:10721080
NRC composition may have been inuenced by Bongiorni S, Mazzuoli M, Masci S, Prantera G (2001)
Facultative heterochromatization in parahaploid male
DNA hypomethylation and histone H3K9Me3 mealybugs: involvement of a heterochromatin-
methylation mark and furthermore, upon such a associated protein. Development 128:38093817
drive seemed to have made markings and then Bongiorni S, Fiorenzo P, Pippoletti D, Prantera G (2004)
spread over the whole of paternal but not mater- Inverted meiosis and meiotic drive in mealybugs.
Chromosoma 112:331341
nal chromosomes. Then, in the cleavage embryos, Bongiorni S, Pugnali M, Volpi S, Bizzaro D, Singh B,
some maternal factor(s) present in the ooplasm Prantera G (2009) Epigenetic marks for chromosome
might be able to regulate the imprinting process imprinting during spermatogenesis in coccoids.
by means of having acquired the requisite amount Chromosoma 118:501512
Brown SW (1958) The chromosomes of an Orthezia spe-
of PCHET-2 that gradually spreads from one cies (Coccoidea- Homoptera). Cytologia 23:429434
pole towards the other end of the developing Brown SW (1959) Lecanoid chromosome behavior in
embryo. A critical amount of regulated PCHET-2 three more families of the Coccoidea (Homoptera).
will then determine whether the paternal Chromosoma 10:278300
Brown SW (1961) Fracture and fusion of coccid chromo-
imprinted chromosomes will become heterochro- somes. Nature 191:14191420
matic, thus picking up the path leading towards Brown SW (1963) The Comstockiella system of chromo-
male embryonic development or will remain some behavior in the armored scale insects (Coccoidea:
euchromatic, thereby losing repressive histone Diaspididae). Chromosoma 14:360406
Brown SW (1964) Automatic frequency response in evo-
modications and NRCs, and that eventually by lution of male haploidy and other coccid chromosome
not acquiring the requisite amount of markers, systems. Genetics 49:797817
hence rely on the path leading towards female Brown SW (1965) Chromosomal survey of the armored
embryonic development. and palm scale insects (Coccoidea: Diaspididae and
Phoenicococcidae). Hilgardia 36:189294
50 R. Sompalaym et al.

Brown SW (1966) Heterochromatin. Science 151:417425 Chandra HS (1962) Inverse meiosis in triploid females of
Brown SW (1969) Developmental control of heterochro- the mealybug, Planococcus citri. Genetics
matization in coccoids. Genetics 61(No. 1, part 2, 47:14411454
Suppl):191198 Chandra HS (1963a) Cytogenetic studies following high
Brown SW (1977) Adaptive status and genetic regulation dosage paternal irradiation in the mealybug.
in major evolutionary changes of coccid chromosome Planococcus citri I. Cytology of X1 females and the
systems. Nucleus 20:145157 problem of lecanoid sex determination. Chromosoma
Brown SW, Bennett FD (1957) On sex determination in 14:310329
the Diaspine scale Pseudaulacaspis pentagona (Targ) Chandra HS (1963b) Cytogenetic studies following high
(Coccoidea). Genetics 42:510523 dosage paternal irradiation in the mealybug.
Brown SW, Chandra HS (1977) Chromosome imprinting Planococcus citri II. Cytology of X1 females and the
and the differential regulation of homologous chromo- problem of lecanoid sex determination. Chromosoma
somes. In: Goldstein L, Prescott DM (ed) Cell biology 14:330346
a comprehensive treatise, Academic press, New York, Chandra HS (1971) Inactivation of whole chromosomes
vol 1, pp 109189 in mammalian X-chromosomes. Nature 253:165168
Brown SW, Cleveland C (1968) Meiosis in the male of Chandra HS, Brown SW (1973) Regulation of
Puto albicans (Coccoidea-Homoptera). Chromosoma X-chromosome inactivation in mammals. Genetics
24:210232 78:342349
Brown SW, Nelson-Rees WA (1961) Radiation analysis Chandra HS, Brown SW (1975) Chromosome imprinting
of a lecanoid genetic system. Genetics 46:9831007 and the mammalian X chromosome. Nature
Brown SW, Nur U (1964) Heterochromatic chromosomes 253:165168
in Coccoids. Science 145:130136 Chauhan NS (1970) Genetic evidence of an unorthodox
Brown SW, Weigmann LI (1969) Cytogenetics of the chromosomal system in the lac insect, Kerria lacca
mealybug Planococcus citri (Risso). Chromosoma (Kerr). Genet Res 16:341344
28:255279 Chauhan NS (1977) Gene expression and transmission in
Brown CJ, Lafreniere RG, Powers VE, Sebastio G, Kerria lacca (Kerr). Heredity 38:155159
Balabio A, Pettigrew AL, Ledbetter DH, Levy E, Cook LG (2000) Extraordinary and extensive karyotypic
Craig IW, Willard HF (1991) Localization of the X variation: A 48-fold range in chromosome number in
inactivation centre on the human X chromosome in the gall-inducing scale insect Apiomorpha (Hemiptera:
Xq13. Nature 349:8284 Eriococcidae). Genome 43:255263
Buchner P (1965) Endosymbiosis of animals with plant Cowell IG, Aucott R, Mahadevaiah SK, Burgoyne PS,
microorganisms. Inter science, New York Huskisson N, Bongiorni S, Prantera G, Fanti L,
Buglia GL, Ferraro M (2004) Germline cyst development Pimpinelli S, Wu R, Gilbert DM, Shi W, Fundele R,
and imprinting in male mealybug Planococcus citri. Morrison H, Jeppesen P, Singh PB (2002)
Chromosoma 113(6):284294 Heterochromatin, HP1 and methylation at lysine 9 of
Buglia GL, Predazzi V, Ferraro M (1999) Cytosine meth- histone H3 in animals. Chromosoma 111:2236
ylation is not involved in the heterochromatization of DAiuto L, de las Heras JI, Ross A, Shen MH, Cooke H
the paternal genome of mealybug Planococcus citri. (2003) Generation of a telomere-based episomal vec-
Chromosom Res 6:13 tor. Biotechnol Prog 19:17751780
Buglia GL, Dionisi D, Ferraro M (2009) The amount of De Lange T (2005) The protein complex that shapes and
heterochromatic proteins in the egg is correlated with safeguards human telomeres. Genes Dev
sex-determination in Planococcus citri (Homoptera: 19:21002110
Coccoidea). Chromosoma 118(6):737746 De Robertis EM, Larrain J, Oelgeschlager M, Wessely O
Bull JJ (1983) The evolution of sex determining mecha- (2000) The establishment of Spemanns organizer and
nisms. Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park patterning of vertebrate embryo. Nat Rev Genet
Cairns BR (2007) Chromatin remodeling! Insights and 1(3):171181
intrigue from single molecule studies. Nat Struct Mol Deobagkar DN, Muralidharan K, Devare SG, Kalghatgi K,
Biol 14(1):19891996 Chandra HS (1982) The mealybug chromosome system
Camacho JPM, Belda J, Cabrero J (1985) Meiotic behav- I: unusual methylated bases and dinucleotides in DNA
iour of the holocentric chromosomes of Nezara virid- of a Planococcus species. J Biosci 4:513526
ula (Insecta: Heteroptera) analyzed by C-banding and Deobagkar DN, Shankar V, Deobagkar DD (1986)
silver impregnation. Can J Genet Cytol 27:490497 Separation of 5-methylcytosine-rich DNA using
Carter W (1962) Insects in relation to plant diseases. immobilized antibody. Enzyme Microb Technol
Interscience Publishers/Willey, NewYork, 8:97100
pp 247265 Devajyothi C, Brahmachari V (1989) Modulation of DNA
Cattanach BM (1974) Position effect variegation in the methyl transferase during the life cycle of a
mouse. Genet Res 23:291306 Planococcus lilacinus. FEBS Lett 250:134138
Chadwick BP, Willard HF (2004) Multiple spatially dis- Devajyothi C, Brahmachari V (1992) Detection of CpA
tinct types of facultative heterochromatin of the human methylase in an insect system: characterisation and
inactive X-chromosome. PNAS 101:1745017455 substrate specicity. Mol Cell Biochem 110:103111
3 Cytogenetics 51

Dikshith TSS (1964) Chromosome behaviour in Laccifer Gavrilov IA, Trapeznikova IV (2010) Karyotypes of six
lacca (Kerr) Lacciferidae-Coccoidea. Cytologia previously unstudied European mealybugs
29:337345 (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Comp Cytogenet
Dikshith TSS (1966) Spermiogenesis in Laccifer lacca 4(2):203205
(Kerr) (Lacciferidae-Coccoidea). Cytologia Gosden RG (2002) Oogenesis as a foundation of embryo-
31:302308 genesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 186:149153
Drozdovsky EM (1966) On chromosomal sets in some Greider CW (1995) Telomerase biochemistry and regula-
coccoids (Homoptera: Coccoidea). Entomologicheskoe tion. Cold Spring, NewYork, (CSH Laboratory Press),
Obozrenie 45(4):712714 [In Russian] pp 3568
Eissenberg JC, Elgin SC (2000) The HP-1 protein family: Gullan PJ, Kosztarab M (1997) Adaptations in scale
getting a grip on chromatin current opinion. Genet insects. Annu Rev Entomol 42:2350
Dev 10:204210 Hartl DL, Brown SW (1970) The origin of male haploid
Epstein H, James TC, Singh PB (1992) Cloning and genetic systems and their expected sex ratio. Theor
expression of Drosophila, HP-1 homologs from a Pop Biol 1:165190
mealybug, Planococcus citri. J Cell Sci 101:463474 Heitz E (1928) Das Heterochromatin der Moose I. Jahrb
Esteban MR, Campos MC, Perondini AL, Goday C Wiss Bot 69:762818
(1997) Role of microtubules and microtubule organiz- Heitz E (1929) Heterochromatin, chromocenter, chromo-
ing centers on meiotic chromosome elimination in mere. Ber Deutsch Bot Ges 47:274
Sciara ocellaris. J Cell Sci 110:721730 Heitz E (1933) Die Herkunft der chromocentren. Planta
Fang J, Feng Q, Ketel CS, Wang H, Cao R, Xia L, 18:571636
Erdjudumat-Bromage H, Tempst P, Simon JS, Zhong Hick CA, Field LM, Devousluire AL (1996) Changes in
Y (2002) Purication and functional heterochromatin the methylation of amplied Esterase DNA during loss
of SETs a nucleosomal histone & lysine 20- specic and reselection of insecticide resistance in Peach-
methyl transferase. Curr Biol 12:10861099 Potato aphids, Myzus Persicae. Insect Biochem Mol
Feil R, Khosla S (1999) Genomic imprinting in mammals: Biol 26:4147
interplay between chromatin and DNA methylation. Houk EJ, Grifths GW (1980) Intracellular symbionts of
Trends Genet 15:431435 the Homoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 25:161187
Ferraro M, Buglia GL, Romano F (2001) Involvement of Hughes-Schrader S (1935) The chromosome cycle of
histone H4 acetylation in the epigenetic inheritance of Phenacoccus (Coccidae). Biol Bull 69(3):62468
different activity states of maternally and paternally Hughes-Schrader S (1944) A primitive coccid chromo-
derived genomes in the Planococcus citri. Chromosoma some cycle in Puto sp. Biol Bull 87:167176
110(2):93101 Hughes-Schrader S (1948) Cytology of coccoids
Ferraro M, Epifani C, Bongiorni S, Nardone AM, Parodi- (Coccoidea: Homoptera). Adv Genet 2:127203
Delno S, Prantera G (1998) Cytogenetic character- Hughes-Schrader S, Ris H (1941) The diffuse spindle
ization of the genome of mealybug Planococcus citri attachment of coccoids, veried by the mitotic behav-
(Homoptera, Coccoidea). Caryologia 51(1):3749 ior of induced chromosome fragments. J Exp Zool
Field LM (2000) Methylation and expression of amplied 87:29456
esterase genes in the aphid Myzus persicae (S). Ishikawa H (1989) Biochemical and molecular aspects of
Biochem J 349:863868 endosymbionts in insects. Int Rev Cytol 116:145
Field LM, Lyko F, Mandrioli M, Prantera G (2004) DNA Jaipuriar SK, Teotia TPS, Lakhotia SC, Chauhan NS
methylation in insects. Insect Mol Biol (1985) A reinvestigation of the lecanoid chromosome
13(2):109115 system in Kerria lacca (Kerr). Cytobios 42:263270
Fire A, Xa S, Montgomery MK, Kostos SA, Driver SE, Jamaluddin M, Philip M, Chandra HS (1979) A rapid and
Nelin CC (1998) Potent and sporadic genetic interfer- gentle method for the salt extraction of Chromatin.
ence by double stranded RNA in C. elegans. Nature J Biosci 1:4959
391:306311 James TC (1937) Sex ratios and the status of the male in
Frydrychov R, Grossmann P, Trubac P, Vtkov M, Pseudococcinae (Hemiptera: Coccidae). Bul Entomol
Marec F (2004) Phylogenetic distribution of TTAGG Res 28:429461
telomeric repeats in insects. Genome 47(1):163178 James TC (1938) The effect of the humidity of the environ-
Gavrilov IA (2004) Taxonomic and cytogenetic studies of ment on sex ratios from over-aged ova of Pseudococcus
scale insects (Homoptera: Coccinea) of European citri (Risso) (Hemiptera: Coccidae). Proc R Entomol
Russia. Proc Zool Inst RAS 300:7782 Soc Lond: Ser A Gen Entomol 13:7379
Gavrilov IA (2007) A catalog of chromosome numbers Jeppesen P, Turner BM (1993) The inactive X-chromosome
and genetic systems of scale insects (Homoptera: in female mammals is distinguished by a lack of his-
Coccinea) of the world. Isr J Entomol 37:145 tons H4 acetylation, a cytogenetic marker for gene
Gavrilov IA, Trapeznikova IV (2007) Karyotypes and expression. Cell 74:281289
reproductive biology of some mealybugs (Insecta: Kantheti P (1994) Studies on a female-specic cDNA
Coccinea: Pseudococcidae). Comp Cytogenet clone and chromatin organization in a, Planococcus
1(2):139148 lilacinus. Ph.D thesis. IISc, Bangalore
52 R. Sompalaym et al.

Kantheti P, Jayarama KS, Chandra HS (1996) Mckenzie HL (1967) Mealybugs of California with tax-
Developmental analysis of a female-specic 16S onomy, biology and control of North American spe-
rRNA gene from Mycetome associated endosymbi- cies ( Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae).
onts of a mealybug, Planococcus lilacinus. Insect University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles,
Biochem Mol Biol 26:9971009 p 525
Karnik PS (1983) Correlation between phosphorylated H Miller DR, Kosztarab M (1979) Recent advances in the
1 histone and condensed chromatin in Planococcus study of scale insects. Annu Rev Entomol 24:127
citri. FEBS 163(1):128130 Mohan KN, Chandra HS (2005) Isolation and analysis of
Khosla S, Kantheti P, Brahmachari V, Chandra HS (1996) sequences showing sex-specic cytosine methylation
A male-specic nuclease- resistant chromatin fraction in the Planococcus lilacinus. Mol Gen Genomics
in the Planococcus lilacinus. Chromosoma 274(6):557568
104(5):386392 Mohan KN, Ray P, Chandra HS (2002) Characterization
Khosla S, Augustus M, Brahmachari V (1999) Sex- of the Planococcus lilacinus, a model organism for
specic organization of middle repetitive DNA studying the whole chromosome imprinting and inac-
sequences in the mealybug Planococcus lilacinus. tivation. Genet Res 79(2):111118
Nucleic Acids Res 27(18):37453751 Mohan KN, SandhyaRani B, Kulashrestha PS, Kadandale
Khosla S, Mendiratta G, Brahmachari V (2006) Genomic JS (2011) Characterisation of TTAGG telomeric
imprinting in the mealybugs. Cytogenet Genome Res repeats, their interstitial occurrence and constitutively
113:4152 active telomerase in the Planococcus lilacinus
Klein AS, Echardt RA (1976) The DNAs of the A and B (Homoptera; Coccoidea). Chromosoma 120:165175
chromosomes of the Pseudococcus obscurus. Mohan KN, Jun G, Kadandale JS (2012) Mealybug as a
Chromosoma 57:333340 model for studying responses to high doses of ionizing
Kondo T, Gullan PJ, Williams DJ (2008) Coccidology. radiation. Curr Topics Ionizing Rad Res 6:101116
The study of scale insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Moharana S (1990) Cytotaxonomy of Coccoids
Coccoidea). Revista Corpoica Ciencia y Tecnologa (Coccidea: Homoptera). In: Sixth international sym-
Agropecuaria 9(2):5561 posium of scale insect studies, Part II, Cracow, Poland,
Kourmouli N, Jeppesen P, Mahadevhaiah S, Burgoyne P, August 612. Agricultural University Press, Cracow,
Wu R, Gilbert DM, Bongiorni S, Prantera G, Fanti L, pp 4754
Pimpinelli S, Shi W, Fundele R, Singh PB (2004) Munson MA, Baumann P, Clark MA, Baumann L, Moran
Heterochromatin and trimethylated lysine 20 of his- A, Vogtlin DJ, Campbell BC (1991) Evidence for the
tone H4 in animals. J Cell Sci 117:24912501 establishment of aphid eubacterial endosymbionts in
Kouzarides T (2007) Chromatin modications and their an ancestor of four aphid families. J Bacteriol
function. Cell 128(4):693705 173:63216324
Lachner M, OCaroll D, Rea S, Mechtler K, Jenuwein T Munson MA, Baumann P, Moran A (1992) Phylogenetic
(2001) Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creatsa relationships of the endosymbionts of mealybugs
binding site for HP-1, proteins. Nature 410:116120 (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) based on the 16s rRNA
Lakhotia SC (2004) Epigenetics of heterochromatin. sequences. Mol. Phylogenetics and Evolution
J Biosci 29(3):219224 1:2630
Li E (2002) Chromatin modications and epigenetic Muramoto N (1980) A study of the C-banded chromo-
reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat Rev somes in some species of heteropteran insects. Proc
Genet 3:662673 Japan Acad Scien phys and BiolScien 56:126130
Li X, Ito M, Zhon F, Youngson N, Zuo X, Leder P, Nielsen SJ, Oulad-Abdelghani M, Oritz JA, Remboutsika
Ferguson Smith AC (2008) A maternal zygotic effect, E, Chambon P, Lesson R (2001) Heterochromatin for-
Zfp57, maintains both maternal and paternal imprints. mation in mammalian cells. Interactions between his-
Dev Cell 15:547557 tones and HP1 proteins. Mol. Cell 7:729731
Little BA (1957) General and applied entomology, 3rd Nelson-Rees WA (1960) A study of sex predetermination
edn. Edition Harper and Row Publishers, New York, in the mealybug Planococcus citri (Risso). J Exp Zool
pp 165173 144:111137
Lorick G (1970) Differential DNA synthesis in hetero- Nokayama J, Rice JC, Strahl BD, Allis CD, Grewal SI
chromatic and euchromatic chromosome sets of (2001) Role of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in epi-
Planococcus citri. Chromosoma 31:1130 genetic control of heterochromatin assembly. Science
Lyon MF (1999) Imprinting and X-chromosome inactiva- 292:110113
tion. Results Prob Cell Different 25:7390 Nur U (1962a) A supernumerary chromosome with an
Mani MS (1989) Indian insects, 1st edn. Satish Book accumulation mechanism in the lecanoid genetic sys-
Enterprises, Agra, pp 103105 tem. Chromosoma 13:249271
Mathur V, Mendiratta G, Ganapathi M, Kennady PK, Nur U (1962b) Sperms, sperm bundles and fertilization in
Dwarkanath BS, Pande G, Brahmachari V (2010) An a mealybug, Pseudococcus obscurus Essig
analysis of histone modications in relation to sex- (Homoptera: Coccoidea). J Morphol 111:173199
specic chromatin organization in the mealybug Nur U (1963) Meiotic parthenogenesis and heterochroma-
Maconellicoccus hirsutus. Cytogenet Genome Res tization in a soft scale, Pulvinaria hydrangeae
129(4):323331 (Coccoidea: Homoptera). Chromosoma 14:123139
3 Cytogenetics 53

Nur U (1966a) Harmful supernumerary chromosomes in a Prez R, Panzera F, Page J, Suja JA, Rufas JS (1997)
mealybug population. Genetics 54:12251238 Meiotic behaviour of holocentric chromosomes:
Nur U (1966b) The effect of supernumerary chromo- Orientation and segregation of autosomes in Triatoma
somes on the development of mealybugs. Genetics infestans (Heteroptera). Chromosom Res 5:4756
54:12391249 Peterson K, Sapienza C (1993) Imprinting the genome:
Nur U (1966c) Non replication of heterochromatic chro- imprinted genes, imprinting genes and an hypothesis
mosomes in a mealybug Planococcus citri (Coccoidea- for their interaction. Annu Rev Genet 27:731
Homoptera). Chromosoma 19:439448 Pfeifer GP, Riggs AD (1991) Chromatin differences
Nur U (1967) Reversal of heterochromatization and the between active and inactive X chromosomes revealed
activity of paternal chromosome set in male mealy- by genomic foot printing of permeabilized cells using
bug. Genetics 56:375389 DNase I and ligation mediated PCR. Genes Dev
Nur U (1969) Harmful B-chromosome in a mealybug. 5:11021113
Chromosoma 28:280297 Prantera G, Bongiorni S (2012) chromosome cycle as a
Nur U (1970) Translocations between euchromatic and paradigm of epigenetics. Genetics Research
heterochromatic chromosomes and spermatocytes International ID : 867390:111
lacking a heterochromatic set in male mealybugs. Prantera G, Ferraro M (1990) Analysis of methylation and
Chromosoma 29:4261 distribution of CpG sequence in human active and
Nur U (1971) Parthenogenesis in Coccoids (Homoptera). inactive X-chromosome by in situ nick translation.
Am Zool 11:301308 Chromosoma 99:1823
Nur U (1972) Diploid arrhenotoky and automictic thely- Raju NG (1994) A study of the chromosomes in three spe-
toky in soft scale insects (Lecaniidae: Coccoidea: cies of Indian. Dissertation, Bangalore University,
Homoptera). Chromosoma 39:381401 Bangalore, Planococcus. M.Phil
Nur U (1977) Maternal inheritance of enzymes in the, Ris H (1942) A cytological and experimental analysis of
Pseudococcus obscurus (Homoptera). Genetics the meiotic behavior of the univalent X-chromosome
86:149160 in the bearberry aphid Tamalia (d'hyllaphis) Coweni
Nur U (1980) Evolution of unusual chromosome systems (Ckll.). J Exptl Zool 90:267326
in scale insects (Coccoidea: Homoptera). In: Blackman Ross L, Pen I, Shuker DM (2010a) Genomic conict in
RL, Hewitt GM, Ashburner M (eds) Insect cytogenet- scale insects: the causes and consequences of bizarre
ics. Royal Entomological Society, London, pp 97117, genetic systems. Biol Rev 85(4):807828
278 Ross L, Langenhof MBW, Pen I, Beukeboom LW, West
Nur U (1990) Heterochromatization and euchromatiza- SA, Shuker DM (2010b) Sex allocation in a species
tion of whole genome in scale insects (Coccoidea: with paternal genome elimination: clarifying the role
Homoptera). Development supplement:2934 of crowding and female age in the mealybug
Nur U, Brett BLH (1985) Genotypes suppressing meiotic Planococcus citri. Evol Ecol Res 12:89104
drive of a B-chromosome in the mealybug Planococcus Ross L, Dealy EJ, Beukeboom LW, Shuker DM (2011)
obscurus. Genetics 110:7392 Temperature, age of mating and starvation determine
Nur U, Brett BLH (1987) Control of meiotic drive of the role of maternal effects on sex allocation in the
B-chromosomes in the mealybug, Planococcus afnis. mealybug Planococcus citri. Behav Ecol Sociobiol
Genetics 115:499510 65:909919
Nur U, Brett BLH (1988) Genotypes affecting the con- Sado T, Hoki Y, Sasaki K (2005) Tsix silence xist through
densation and transmission of heterochromatic modication of chromatin structure. Dev Cell
B-chromosomes in the mealybug, Planococcus afnis. 9:159165
Chromosoma 96:201212 Scarbrough K, Hattman S, Nur U (1984) Relationship of
Nur U, Brown SW, Beardsley JW (1987) Evolution of DNA methylation level to the presence of heterochro-
chromosome number in mealybugs (Pseudococcidae: matin in mealybugs. Mol Cell Biol 4:599603
Homoptera). Genetica 74:5360 Schotta G, Lachner M, Sarma K, Ebert A, Sengupta R,
Panzera F, Alvarez F, Sanchez-Rufas J, Prez R, Suja JA, Reuter G, Reinberg D, Jenuwein T (2004) A silencing
Scvortzoff E, Dujardin JP, Estramil E, Salvatella R pathway to induce H3-K9 and H4-K20 trimethylation
(1992) C-heterochromatin polymorphism in holocen- at constitutive heterochromatin. Genes Dev
tric chromosomes of Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: 18:12511262
Reduviidae). Genome 35(6):10681074 Schrader F (1921) The chromosomes of Pseudococcus
Papeschi AG (1998) C-banding and DNA content in these nipae. Biol Bull 40:259270
species of Belastoma (Heteroptera) with large differ- Schrader F (1923a) The origin of the mycetocytes in
ences in chromosome size and number. Genetica Pseudococcus. Biol Bull 45(6):279302
76:4351 Schrader F (1923b) A study of the chromosomes in three
Parida BB, Moharana S (1982) Studies on the chromo- species of Pseudococcus. Archiv fr Zellforschung
some constitution in 42 species of scale insects 17:4562
(Coccoidea: Homoptera) from India. Chromosome Schrader F (1931) The chromosome cycle of Protortonia
Information Service 32:1820 primitiva (Coccidae) and considerationof the meiotic
54 R. Sompalaym et al.

division apparatus in the male. Z Wiss Zool Pseudococcidi (Homoptera: Coccoidea). Bollettino
138:386408 del Laboratorio di Entomologia Agraria Filippo
Schrader F, Hughes-Schrader S (1926) Haploidy in Icerya Silvestri. Portici 34:113135
purchasi. Z Wiss Zool 128:182200 Trivers RL, Hare H (1976) Haplo-diploidy and the evolu-
Schweizer D, Loidl J (1987) A model for heterochromatin tion of the social insect. Science 191:249263
dispersion and the evolution of C-band patterns. Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of paren-
Chromos Today 9:6174 tal ability to vary sex ratio of offspring. Science
Shuker DM, Moynihan AM, Ross L (2009) Sexual con- 179:9092
ict, sex allocation and the genetic system. Biol Lett Tulsyan GP (1963) Studies on chromosome number and
5:682685 spermatogenesis in the lac insect Laccifera lacca
Singh PB, Georgatos SD (2002) HP1: facts, open ques- (Kerr). Curr Sci 32:374375
tions and speculation. J Struct Biol 140:1016 Vakoc CR, Mandst SA, Okachak BA, Blobel GA (2005)
Singh PB, Miller JR, Pearce J, Kothary R, Burton RD, Histone H3 lysine methylation and HP-1gamma are
Paro R, James TC, Gaunt SJ (1991) A sequence motif associated with transcription elongation through mam-
found in a Drosophila heterochromatin protein is con- malian chromate. Mol Cell 19:381391
served in animals and plants. Nucleic Acids Res Varndell NP, Godfray HCG (1996) Facultative adjustment
19:789794 of the sex-ratio in an insect (P. citri: Pseudococcidae)
Skiniotis G, Moazed D, Waitz T (2007) Acetylated his- with paternal genome loss. Evolution
tone tail peptides induce structural rearrangements in 50(5):21002105
the RJC chromatin remodeling complex. J. Biol Chem Venkatachalaiah G (1989) Characterization of heterochro-
282:2080420808 matin in chromosomes of Planococcus citri. XIII All
Solter D (1998) Imprinting. Intl J Dev Biol 42:951954 India Cell Biology Conference and Cell Biology
Spofford J (1976) In: Ashburmer & Novitski E (eds) Symposia. CCMB, Hyderabad
Position effect variation in Drosophila. Academic Venkatachalaiah G, Chowdaiah BN (1987) Air-drying
Press, London, pp 9551018 technique for the preparation of mosquito chromo-
Surani MAH (1991) Genomic imprinting: developmental somes. Nucleus 30(1, 2): 4446
signicance and molecular mechanism. Curr Opin Vitkova M, Karl J, Traut W, Zrzavy J, Marec F (2005) The
Genes Dev 1:241246 evolutionary origin of insect telomeric repeats
Tremblay E (1977) Advances in endosymbiotic studies in (TTAGG)n. Chromosomal Res 13:145156
Coccoidea. Va. Polytech. Ins. State University. Res Volpi S, Bongiorni S, Prantera G (2007) HP2-like protein:
Div Bull 127:2333 a new piece of the facultative heterochromatin puzzle.
Tremblay E (1989) Coccoidea endocytobiosis. In: Insect Chromosoma 116(3):249258
endocytobiosis: Morphology, physiology, genetics, White MJD (1973) Animal cytology and evolution, 3rd
evolution (eds.W. Schwemmler and G. Gassner). CRC edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 961
Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 145173 White MJD (1978) Modes of speciation. W. H. Freeman,
Tremblay E, Caltagirone LE (1973) Fate of polar bodies San Francisco
in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 18:421444 Wu RS, Penuaz HT, Hatch CI, Bonner WM (1986)
Tremblay E, Tranfaglia A, Rotundo G, Iccarino FM Histones and their modications. CRC Crit Ren
(1977) Osservazioni comparate su alcune specie di Biochrem 20:201263
Taxonomy
4
M. Mani

The insects coming under Hemiptera, Phenacoccinae, and Rhizoecinae (Downie and
Sternorrhyncha, Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae, Gullan 2005). This estimate was recently revised
and Putoidae are named as mealybugs (Williams in light of integrated molecular and morphologi-
2004). Following the application by Miller cal data, and only two subfamilies emerged:
(1975b), the family-group name Pseudococcidae Pseudococcinae and Phenacoccinae (Hardy et al.
(Cockerell 1905) was placed on the Ofcial List 2008). Molecular studies may either verify this
of Family-Group Names in Zoology (Melville grouping or show a different picture. By the study
1983) (type genus Pseudococcus Westwood of prokaryotic primary endosymbiont
1840). A (1968) attempted a higher classica- (P-endosymbiont) nucleotide sequences, Thao
tion of the Pseudococcidae based on a study of et al. (2002) showed that Antonina pretiosa
the characters of adult males of 17 species. The Ferris, presently included in the Sphaerococcinae,
scale insects are generally divided into two is closely related to the blue-green or blue-black
groups, namely the archeococcids and the neo- mealybugs of the genera Amonostherium
coccids. The archeococcids possess two to eight Morrison and Morrison, Australicoccus Williams,
pairs of abdominal spiracles, which are absent in Melanococcus Williams, and Nipaecoccus Sulc.
the neococcids (Koteja 2008). The family These genera are included in the Trabutininae, as
Pseudococcidae (mealybugs) belongs to the neo- discussed by Koteja (1974a, b).
coccid group. Pseudococcidae constitutes the second largest
After extensive studies on the labium of 84 family of Coccoidea, with more than 2000
species of Pseudococcidae, Koteja (1974a, b) described species and ca. 290 genera (Ben-Dov
proposed that the family is composed of four sub- 2006; Downie and Gullan 2004). Pseudococcids
families: Trabutininae, Rhizoecinae, occur in all zoogeographical regions of the world.
Sphaerococcinae, and Pseudococcinae. This Pseudococcids are distributed in different geo-
classication has gained wide acceptance. A graphical regions as follows: Australasian region
recent phylogenetic study, based on the analysis (459 spp.), Afrotropical region (298 spp.),
of nucleotide sequence data, supported the exis- Nearctic region (424 spp.), Neotropical region
tence of three subfamilies: Pseudococcinae, (283 spp.), Oriental region (431 spp.), and
Palearctic region (710 spp.). Of the described
species, pseudococcids are most abundant in the
M. Mani (*) Palearctic region and least numerous in the
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Neotropical area. There are about 2000 species of
Bangalore 560089, India mealybugs worldwide. In southern Asia, 353
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 55


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_4
56 M. Mani

species of mealybugs have been recorded under considerable taxonomic value. This is exempli-
61 genera of which 105 species occurred in India ed in certain species of Chorizococcus and
with maximum species reported from Karnataka Spilococcus. The distance between the base of
(40 species) followed by Tamil Nadu (35 spe- one antenna and that of the other is of consider-
cies). India is rich in species of Formicococcus able value in separating species, particularly in
Takahashi (10 spp.), Antonina Signoret (six spp.), certain members of Rhizoecus. Most coccidolo-
Dysmicoccus Ferris (12 spp.), and Paracoccus gists have placed little taxonomic emphasis on
Ezzat and Mc Connell (six spp.). The genera, the eyes of mealybugs. However, the presence or
which are endemic to the Indian region, are absence of eyes in Rhizoecus and related genera
Aemulantonina Williams, Coccidohystrix has proved to be taxonomically useful. The
Lindinger, Eriodes Green, Lankacoccus labium varies considerably in shape and form
Williams, Pedronia Green, and Pseudantonina and may be elongate and slender in some species,
Green (Williams 2004). while in others, it is short and broad; in certain
Identications of mealybugs in practically all species, there appear to be signicant differences
cases are based upon the adult female. A sum of in the shape of both the basal segment and the tip
the morphological characteristics of the mealy- of the rostrum. Some species exhibit a sclerotized
bug used in identication of species belonging to area on the derm just anterior to the clypeus. In
family Pseudococcidae are as follows: Anal ring some instances, this has been of taxonomic assis-
is always present, divided longitudinally into two tance. The body form normally elongate; legs are
halves, each with single inner and outer rows of normally present and usually well developed.
angular cells and three setae; in a few instances, Considerable taxonomic emphasis has been
the ring is very much reduced, the sclerotization placed on the mealybug legs in the past by certain
is slight, and the pores apparently are nearly or coccidologists. Denticle or tooth on the plantar
completely lacking. Two pairs of dorsal ostioles surface of the claw offers an especially excellent
are normally present in the adult female. In some key character for the recognition of this series of
species, the number of these structures may be genera. Although the denticle or tooth still gener-
reduced, or they may be entirely lacking; thus, in ally is quite helpful in dening the members of the
some forms, the posterior pair is clearly present, genus Phenacoccus, it cannot be completely relied
but the anterior pair is lacking; in a few forms, upon as exemplifying this group alone. In many
the ostioles seem to be lacking in the adult but are species of Chorizococcus and Spilococcus, this
present in the rst stage. Others lack ostioles in tiny denticle or tooth on the claw is present, and
all stages; nevertheless, the totality of their char- it occurs in combination with other characters
acters places them in this family. The antennae that are not at all typical of the Phenacoccus series.
have been used in diagnoses of mealybug genera The body is normally with lateral groups of
for a long time and even for species separation. pores and has enlarged, conical setae, which form
Hence, more emphasis has been placed on the cerarii, that at times are evident only on the anal
antennal structure than on any other physical lobes, occasionally lacking, normally with pores
detail. In Antonina and related genera and species of the trilocular type present, rarely lacking.
of Eumyrmococcus, antennae may be reduced to Tubular ducts of a distinctive type are normally
one or two segmented stubs. It has been noted present as cylindrical invaginations in the derm,
that in certain genera, exclusive of Rhizoecus, the tube usually more heavily sclerotized at its
Geococcus, and Pygmaeococcus, where the opening, and with one side of the inner end of
antennae are noticeably short, small, ve to six tube showing a delicate lamentous prolonga-
segmented, and geniculate, the comparative slen- tion. Combinations of these characters will dene
derness or stoutness of the normal cylindrical the few aberrant forms of mealybugs that are
antenna in relation to its length has proved of known to exist.
4 Taxonomy 57

Translucent dots or pores on the hind femur 1. Place the entire specimen in a 6-ml., 1-in.
and tibia have denite signicance for species handled porcelain casserole dish approxi-
segregation. In some mealybug forms, each hind mately half-lled with Essigs Aphid Fluid
coxa bears a cluster of pores at its base, and the (see formula below), cover with 1-inch
area in which these occur is usually wrinkled. watch glass, and heat (120130 F) to dis-
This pore cluster is taxonomically important for solve (1015 min). A lateral incision made
differentiating certain species. The trochanter between the mid- and forelegs will help to
usually possesses a long seta at inner distal end clear the specimens more rapidly.
and the variation in its length and thickness 2. Remove the porcelain dish from the hot plate
proved to be a useful distinguishing character in and tease out the body contents while the uid
species of the Allomyrmococcini. The stoutness is still hot.
or slenderness of the pseudococcid legs in rela- 3. Transfer the cleared specimen to a droplet of
tion to their length has proved to be of much gum-chloral hydrate or chloral-hydrate
taxonomic importance. medium (see formula below). Apply a cover
Clypeolabral shield structure seems to reach slip and heat the slide on hot plate until the
its greatest development in certain bamboo- medium boils slightly. The specimen is then
feeding species of the tribe Serrolecaniini, and conditioned for examination under the com-
sometimes reaches almost the same length as the pound microscope. (Polyvinyl alcohol is also
clypeolabral shield. The structure is now known considered a good temporary-type medium.
to occur in many species but sometimes it is The specimens should be transferred from
barely perceptible. The extension is present Essigs Aphid Fluid directly into the solution.)
mainly in grass-infesting species and occasion- Valuable specimens are recoverable from this
ally in mealybugs feeding on the other groups of medium for permanent embedding in Canada
monocotyledons but, apparently, never in balsam, although this should not be delayed
dicotyledon-infesting species. longer than 3 or 4 months.
Cerarii situated on the dorsum of the body,
their total number, the number of enlarged coni-
cal setae, the presence or absence of auxiliary
setae, and the presence or absence of the accom- 4.2 Permanent Mounts
panying sclerotization have proved to be impor-
tant specic taxonomic characters. The following steps are used in the preparation of
Ventrally, the anal lobe is often sclerotized, permanent pseudococcid mounts:
and the character of this pigmentation is some-
times used as a taxonomic feature at the generic 1. Place the entire specimen in a 6-ml., 1-in.
and specic levels. handled porcelain casserole dish approxi-
The presence or absence of a circulus is mately half-lled with Essigs Aphid Fluid
exceedingly helpful as a key character within a (see formula below), cover with 1-inch
genus. At times, they vary in size, form, or num- watch glass, and heat (120130 F.) on a hot
ber to such a degree as to be of taxonomic value. plate until the body contents are dissolved
In some genera, several circuli may be present. (30 min to 1 h). A lateral incision made
between mid- and forelegs will help to clear
specimens more rapidly.
4.1 Temporary Mounts 2. Remove the porcelain dish from the hot plate
and tease the body contents while the uid is
The following steps are used in the preparation of still hot. If the specimen is not thoroughly
temporary pseudococcid mounts: cleared, tease out the loosened body contents
58 M. Mani

and transfer the specimen to a fresh solution of 6. Transfer the specimens to cellosolve in a clean
Essigs Aphid Fluid. Add three or four drops of depression slide and leave in this solution for
the prepared staining solution, consisting of not less than 5, preferably 20, min.
either acid fuchsin, lignin pink, or erythrosine 7. Transfer the specimens to xylene in a clean
(stain No. 2) (see staining solution formulae depression slide and wash thoroughly for 1 or
below), or even more of this solution if a deeper 2 min.
staining is desired. Heat again until the speci- 8. Place the specimens in a droplet of Canada
mens have absorbed the stain (1530 min balsam on a glass-cover slide and apply the
depending on the specimens involved.) cover slip. Use as little balsam as possible to
3. Transfer the specimens directly into a clear facilitate examination under the compound
6-ml porcelain casserole dish half-lled with microscope, especially under the oil-
tetrahydrofuran (C4H8O) and tease out the immersion magnication.
remaining body contents and excess stain.
Leave the specimens in tetrahydrofuran for The formula used to prepare Essigs Aphid
not more than 5 min, since prolonged periods Fluid is as follows:
may cause shriveling. In the case of very frag-
ile specimens, add a few drops of tetrahydro- Lactic acid (reagent grade 85 %) 20 parts
furan to the Essigs Aphid Fluid before Phenol (saturated in distilled H2O) 2 parts
transferring straight to tetrahydrofuran; this Glacial acetic acid 4 parts
will prevent shriveling. Water (distilled) 1 part
4. Transfer directly into Canada balsam and
apply the cover slip. Specimens should be The formula used to prepare chloral-hydrate
transferred rapidly form tetrahydrofuran to medium is as follows:
balsam, as little carry-over of tetrahydrofuran
as possible. Air bubbles are often left under Gum arabic 1g
the cover glass because the solution evapo- Dextrose 1g
rates quickly, but they will ultimately work Chloral hydrate 10 g
their way to the edge of the cover glass. It is
advisable to burst these bubbles with a needle Iodine crystals 1/10 g
dipped in tetrahydrofuran solution before Glycerin 1 cc.
placing the mount on heat to cure. This curing Water (distilled) 1 cc.
should not be done at more than 100 F, and
30 min to 1 his required to sufciently harden The formulae used in preparing the staining
the mount. solutions Nos. 1 and 2 are as follows:
5. When the balsam has hardened, the cover slip
may be ringed with shellac or other suitable No. 1 Essigs Aphid 15 ml.
Fluid
media to prevent later fracturing of the bal-
Acid fuchsin (2 % aqueous 20 drops
sam. It is good to remember that the clearing solution)
and straining process cannot be hurried. No. 2 Essigs Aphid 15 ml.
However, when the specimens are properly Fluid
cleared and stained and the mounting tech- Acid fuchsin (2 % aqueous 20 drops
niques are mastered, excellent mounts will solution)
result. Because of the high volatility of tetra- Lignin pink (2 % aqueous 20 drops
solution)
hydrofuran, some of the smaller and more
Erythrosin (2 % aqueous 20 drops
delicate mealybugs tend to collapse when
solution)
transferred into it. In such a case, step 3 should
be modied as follows:
4 Taxonomy 59

Staining solution No. 1 gives excellent results. the Australian mealybugs by Williams (1985),
One slight drawback, however, is that the speci- and the mealybugs of Central and South America
mens from certain lots may begin to fade after 3 by Williams et al. (1992). A systematic catalog of
or 4 months. Preliminary observations made over the mealybugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera:
approximately a 2-year period indicate that the Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) has
staining solution No. 2 tends to overcome this data on geographical distribution, host plants,
feature, at least to some degree. It is interesting to biology, and economic importance by Ben-Dov
note that the species vary in their response to (1994) and the mealybugs of Southern Asia by
staining, some turning to darker red than others Williams (2004). The above keys may be referred
after the same time in the staining solution. This for identication up to species level.
has been advantageous in certain instances, espe-
cially where two species are mixed on a single
host and are indistinguishable from each other 4.3 Field Identication of Major
when collected in the eld. In such instances, the Species of Mealybugs
specimens may be easily segregated by species
before they are mounted. All mealybug species resemble each other to the
Brief instructions for slide-mounting scales untrained eye, so it is very important that an
and mealybugs have also been provided by the expert is brought to identify the mealybug spe-
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) cies involved. The following characteristics are
in their Systematic Entomology webpage. Keys useful for eld identication. The adult female
available in the identication of mealybugs are mealybug is considered for the identication of
the mealybugs of California by McKenzie (1967), body shape, size, and color (Table 4.1):

Table 4.1 List of mealybug species with eld-identifying characters with their respective images
Mealybug species Field characters Images of mealybug
Antonina graminis (Maskell) (Rhodesgrass mealybug)
Broadly oval to circular body; rotund in lateral view; dark
purple or brown body; without lateral wax laments;
enclosed in a white, felted sac that turns yellow with age;
usually with a long, slender, white waxy tube protruding
through a hole in the ovisac at the posterior end of the body.
Usually present on the crown or nodes of the grass host.
Ovoviviparous; rst instars are cream colored; legs absent.

Noxious bamboo mealybug (Antonina pretiosa)


Adult body, brown; about 23 mm in length; immature
stages (i.e., crawlers) yellow; generally found at the nodal
regions of various bamboos. Sooty mold occurring at the
nodal regions and long wax laments arising from the nodal
areas are common symptoms.

(continued)
60 M. Mani

Table 4.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Field characters Images of mealybug
Coccidohystrix insolita (Green) (Brinjal mealybug)
Adult females are light yellowish green in color with many
long glassy laments; very little dorsal wax; secretes a
white, waxy ovisac up to six times as long as the body of the
female; immature stages with no secretion of thick layer of
mealy wax; the body being shiny yellow-green with
submedian gray spots on two abdominal and one thoracic
segments.

Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) (Pineapple pink


mealybug)
Body oval or rotund; pink or pink-orange; legs yellowish
brown; body covered by thin layer of white mealy wax
allowing body color to be visible, without bare areas on
dorsum; dorsal ovisac absent, a few lamentous strands on
venter; with 17 pairs of conspicuous lateral wax laments,
often slightly curved, posterior pairs longest, one third to
one half as long as body, anterior laments shorter than
posterior pairs. Occurring on all parts of plant, usually in
protected area. Ovoviviparous; eggs pink.

Dysmicoccus neobrevipes (Beardsley) (Pineapple gray


mealybug)
Body oval or rotund; gray or gray-orange; legs yellowish
brown; body covered by occulent white mealy wax,
without bare areas on dorsum; dorsal ovisac absent; a few
lamentous strands on venter; with 17 pairs of conspicuous
lateral wax laments, often slightly curved, posterior pairs
longest, one third to one half as long as body, anterior
laments shorter than posterior pairs. Primarily occurring on
the above-ground parts of the host. Ovoviviparous.

Dysmicoccus boninsis (Kuwana) (Gray sugarcane mealybug)


Body elongate or elongate oval; body gray; legs yellowish
brown; covered by white mealy wax, without bare areas on
dorsum; dorsal abdomen covered by lamentous ovisac;
with four to six short lateral laments, posterior pair longest
and thickest. Usually present in leaf sheaths of sugar cane or
other grass host. Oviparous; eggs yellow.

(continued)
4 Taxonomy 61

Table 4.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Field characters Images of mealybug
Ferrisia gilli (Gills mealybug)
Body 25 mm in length and pinkish grey in color; often
covered with white wax secreted from a pore, creating the
appearance of two stripes (darker areas) on their backs.
Larger nymphs and mature females produce a network of
white laments (510 mm) that protrude from the back of
the insect.

Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) (Striped mealybug)


Body elongate oval; body dark gray; legs dark brown;
covered by white mealy wax; with a pair of dark dorsal
stripes on the body measuring 45 mm in length with two
long tails; body covered with long slender crystal like
laments/glossy threads in all directions; without lateral
laments. Usually ovoviviparous; eggs hatch immediately
after laying.

Hypogeococcus pungens (Granara de Willink)


Body rotund to elliptical; rounded in lateral view; body pink
to pink-yellow; legs light yellow; dorsal ovisac present in all
instars, covering entire dorsum; very lamentous; mealy
wax lightly dusted over body; lateral laments absent.
Occurring on all above ground parts of plant, often in
clumps at nodes, usually in protected areas. Oviparous; eggs
pink, hatch soon after being laid.

Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) (Pink hibiscus mealybug)


Adult female elongate oval; 3 mm in length; body pink in
color sparsely covered with white waxy coating; no to few
lateral (side) wax laments; body fringe absent; no stripes
on the back; body uid dark red; anal laments short; ovisac
irregular and beneath the body; ovisacs covering orange eggs
while crawlers are orange to light brick red in color. Feeding
causes twisted or distorted foliage.

(continued)
62 M. Mani

Table 4.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Field characters Images of mealybug
Nipaecoccus nipae (Maskell) (Coconut mealybug)
Body round; somewhat at dorsoventrally; body red to
brown-orange; covered by thick white or yellow-orange
wax, without bare areas on dorsum; dorsal ovisac absent;
with ten to 12 pairs of broad lateral wax laments, posterior
pairs longest and thinner; anterior pairs broad and conical,
longest lament about one fourth as long as body. Primarily
occurring on foliage of host. Apparently ovoviviparous;
dorsum with ve to eight waxy laments similar in shape
and size to those on lateral areas of thorax and head.
Specimens turn black in 70 % alcohol.

Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) (Lebbeck/Spherical


mealybug)
Body round or broadly oval; somewhat attened
dorsoventrally; purple; covered by thick white, creamy, or
pale yellow wax, without bare areas on dorsum; ovisac
covering dorsum; probably with ve or six pairs of lateral
wax laments. Primarily occurring on foliage and fruits of
the host. Apparently oviparous; eggs purple; dorsum
probably with waxy laments. Specimens turn black in 70 %
alcohol.

Acute mealybug (Oracella acuta)


Body red to pink; about 3 mm in length; without side
(lateral) wax laments. Generally found both underneath
bark and on needles of hosts.

Palmicultor browni
Body reddish brown to pink; about 3 mm in length; with
side (lateral) wax laments; no ovisac produced.

Palmicultor palmarum (Maskell) (Palm mealybug)


Body round or broadly oval; somewhat attened
dorsoventrally; body red-brown; some specimens covered by
thick occulent mealy wax, others with less dense wax,
without bare areas on dorsum; ovisac absent; with eight to
14 or 15 lateral wax laments, posterior laments longest
and broadest, sometimes coalescing, laments on anterior
thorax and head shorter and thinner, posterior pair about 1/8
length of the body. Primarily occurring on foliage of the
host.

(continued)
4 Taxonomy 63

Table 4.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Field characters Images of mealybug
Palmicultor lumpurensis
Body grayish pink, about 3 mm in length, with large
amounts of white wax visible on host plant; body with few
side (lateral) wax laments; no ovisac produced.

Paracoccus marginatus (Williams and Granara de Willink)


(Papaya mealybug)
Body light yellowish white; 23 mm in length, with many
lateral (side) wax laments; ovisacs present with greenish
yellow eggs; wax pattern on body lacking any stripes on its
upper surface (i.e., dorsum); ovisac position is beneath and
behind the body and can be as much as twice as long as the
body; female adults also possess a series of short waxy
caudal laments less than a quarter of the length of the body
around the margin. When preserved in 80 % alcohol, P.
marginatus turn black within 2448 h.

Phenacoccus madeirensis (Green) (Madeira mealybug)


Body oval; somewhat attened dorsoventrally; body gray;
legs red; covered by thin, white, mealy wax, with dark
dorsosubmedial bare spots on intersegmental areas of thorax
and abdomen; these areas forming one pair of dark
longitudinal lines on dorsum; ovisacs present with yellow
eggs; ovisac covering entire dorsum; with 18 pairs of lateral
wax laments, posterior pairs longest, about the same length
or less length of the body.

Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) (Solenopsis mealybug/


cotton mealybug)
Body oval, often quite large (5 mm); somewhat rounded in
lateral view; dark green almost black; legs red; covered by
thin, white, mealy wax, with dark dorsosubmedial bare spots
on intersegmental areas of thorax and abdomen; these areas
forming one pair of dark longitudinal lines on dorsum;
ovisac absent from dorsum, but well developed ventrally;
with 18 pairs of lateral wax laments, posterior pairs
longest, up to the same length of the body. Normally
occurring on the crown of the host; surface of lateral
laments rough.

(continued)
64 M. Mani

Table 4.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Field characters Images of mealybug
Phencoccus solani (Ferris) (Solanum mealybug)
Body with short laments; absence of long tails; absence of
stripes on the body; fringe present; no ovisac; similar to Ph.
solenopsis, but in P. solani on the other hand, bare spots
absent; and it has a medial wax crest with faint submedial
bare areas on the abdomen forming a pair of extremely faint
longitudinal lines on dorsum.

Phenacoccus manihoti (Matile-Ferrero) (Cassava mealybug)


Female mealybugs are ovoid; 0.51.4 mm in length;
rose-pink and dusted with white, powdery wax; the eyes are
relatively prominent; legs are well developed and of equal
size; body segmentation is apparent; very short lateral and
caudal white wax laments in the form of swellings that
produce a toothed appearance to the body outline; body is
usually covered with a waxy, with tufts of occulent waxy
secretion at posterior end and around the margins. The
species always reproduces parthenogenetically.

Phenacoccus aceris (Apple mealybug)


Adult female 34 mm in length; with a sage green body
color visible through the white waxy coating; tails on the
caudal end of the mealybug are shorter than those of grape
mealybug; and the body color (green vs. pale purple)
distinguishes it from grape mealybug.

Phenacoccus herreni (Cox and Williams)


(Cassava mealybug)
Very close to Ph.manioti, but yellowish; reproduces
bi-parentally.

Phenacoccus peruvianus (Bougainvillea mealybug)


Adult females (about 3 mm in length); elongate oval;
grayish-white; lack marginal wax laments; produce
relatively long, white waxy ovisacs on the leaves and stems
of their host plants.

(continued)
4 Taxonomy 65

Table 4.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Field characters Images of mealybug
Phenacoccus parvus (Morrison) (Morrisons small
mealybug)
Body oval to elongate, light yellow covered with thin white
wax powder with peripheral small wax laments of uniform
size (1718 mm); without bare areas; ovisac absent dorsally,
present ventrally, long and cylindrical, up to three times
length of body; with 18 pairs of lateral wax laments, all
about same length, about 1/8 or less length of body.
Occurring on roots and foliage of host.

Planococcus citri (Risso) (Citrus mealybug)


Body oval; slightly rounded in lateral view; body yellow
when newly molted, pink or orange-brown when fully
mature; legs brown-red; mealy wax covering body, not thick
enough to hide body color; with dorsomedial bare area on
dorsum forming central longitudinal stripe (more obvious
than on P. cus); ovisac ventral only, may be two times
longer than body when fully formed; with 18 pairs of lateral
wax laments, most relatively short, often slightly curved,
posterior pair slightly longer, laments anterior of posterior
pair small, posterior pair about 1/8 length of body.
Oviparous; eggs yellow.

Planococcus cus (Signoret) (Vine mealybug)


Body oval; slightly rounded in lateral view; body yellow
when newly molted, pink or orange-brown when fully
mature; legs brown-red; mealy wax covering body, not thick
enough to hide body color; with dorsomedial bare area on
dorsum forming central longitudinal stripe (not as obvious
as on P. citri); ovisac ventral only, may be two times longer
than the body when fully formed; with 18 lateral wax
laments, most relatively short, often slightly curved,
posterior pair slightly longer, laments anterior of posterior
pair small, posterior pair about 1/8 length of body.
Oviparous; eggs yellow.

(continued)
66 M. Mani

Table 4.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Field characters Images of mealybug
Planococcus kraunhiae (Kuwana) (Japanese mealybug)
Body oval or rotund; slightly rounded in lateral view; dark
purple or red; mealy wax covering body, not thick enough to
hide purple body color; dorsomedial bare area either absent
or unobvious; ovisac not described in literature; 18 lateral
wax laments, most relatively short, straight, posterior pair
slightly longer, laments anterior of posterior pair small,
broader than on P. citri, posterior pair about 1/8 length of
body; surface of lateral laments rough.

Planococcus lilacinus (Cockerell) (Coffee mealybug/


Oriental mealybug)
Body rotund; conspicuously rounded in lateral view;
brownish red or tan; mealy wax covering body, in thick
segmental clumps on mature females; body color evident at
segmental lines; with dorsomedial bare area on dorsum
forming central longitudinal stripe or oval area; ovisac
absent; with 18 lateral wax laments, broad, convergent,
posterior pairs sometimes curved, others straight, all
laments about same length, about 1/8 length of body.
Primarily occurring on the fruit, stems, and foliage of host;
specimens have been reported on the roots of coffee.
Ovoviviparous; rst instars pale maroon; surface of lateral
laments rough.

Planococcus minor (Maskell) (Pl. pacicus Cox)


The mealybug undergoes four development stages for the
male and three for the female. The total developmental
period (egg to adult) lasts 2830 (28.79) days for the male
and 2830 (33.70) days for the female. The female lays
7132 eggs/mass for its entire life span. A male to female
ratio of 1:4.43 is recorded. Adult male lives shorter (14
days) than the female (411 days).

(continued)
4 Taxonomy 67

Table 4.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Field characters Images of mealybug
Pseudococcus calceolariae (Maskell) (Citrophilus
mealybug)
Body oval; slightly rounded in lateral view; dark in color,
red when crushed; ostiole uid red; mealy wax covering
body, usually thick enough to hide body color except on
intersegmental lines; with longitudinal lines on dorsum
formed by bare areas occurring in submedial and
submarginal areas; ovisac ventral only; with 17 lateral wax
laments, most relatively short, straight except posterior
pair, which may be slightly curved, posterior pair longest,
about 1/4 length of the body. Primarily occurring on foliage,
stems, and fruit of host. Oviparous; eggs yellow or orange;
surface of lateral laments rough.

Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi (Gimpel and Miller)


(Jack Beardsley mealybug)
Body light grayish in color and oval, slightly rounded in
lateral view; about 3 mm long with 17 lateral wax laments,
becoming progressively longer posteriorly of the body; anal
laments equivalent to body length or more; ovisac ventral
only covering hind part of the body; no stripes on the back;
body contents crushed are reddish brown; mealy wax
covering body, not too thick enough to hide the body color.

Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Tozzetti) (Long-tailed


mealybug)
Body oval, slightly rounded in lateral view; body color
variable from light yellow to gray, mealy wax covering body,
thin enough so that the body color shows through; with three
longitudinal lines on dorsum, with single, broad dorsomedial
line, with two thin submarginal lines; ovisac absent, with 17
lateral wax laments, with posterior pairs conspicuously
longer than others, posterior pair as long as or longer than
body.

(continued)
68 M. Mani

Table 4.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Field characters Images of mealybug
Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrhorn) (Grape mealybug)
Body oval; slightly rounded in lateral view; body dark
orange or pink; body contents crushed dark orange; ostiole
secretion light orange; mealy wax covering thin enough so
that the body color shows through; sometimes with faint,
wide medial longitudinal line on dorsum; ovisac encloses all
but head of female; with 17 lateral wax laments, becoming
progressively longer posteriorly, anterior pair about 1/8
width of the body, straight, unusually thin, posterior pair
longest, varying from 1/4 to 1/2 length of body. Oviparous;
eggs orange.

Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) (Obscure mealybug)


Body oval; slightly rounded in lateral view; pink or light
purple; mealy wax covering usually thin enough so that the
body color shows through; without longitudinal line on
dorsum; ovisac encloses all but head of female; with 17
lateral wax laments, becoming progressively longer
posteriorly, anterior pair about 1/8 width of body, straight,
unusually thin, posterior pair longest, varying from 1/4 to
1/2 length of body. Oviparous; eggs yellow.

Rastrococcus iceryoides (Green)


Body oval to round; slightly rounded to convex in lateral
view; light yellow; legs light yellow; mealy wax covering
thick, in median area forming medial longitudinal ridge on
thorax and abdomen; without longitudinal bare areas on
dorsum; ovisac ventral, copious, tilting posterior end of
female off of host substrate when fully developed, similar in
appearance to cottony cushion scale (Icerya purchasi
Maskell); lateral wax laments variable in number,
coalescing through time, when separate, broad at base
narrowing to rounded point at apex, ultimately forming
plate-like fringe around body, anterior laments nearly 1/2
as long as width of the body, posterior laments slightly
longer than others, about 1/4 length of body. Oviparous;
eggs honey yellow.

Rastrococcus invadens
Ovoviparous; a tuft of hairs in the anterior region; lateral
laments increase in length from anterior to posterior region;
infestation conned to midrib of the leaves.

(continued)
4 Taxonomy 69

Table 4.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Field characters Images of mealybug
Rastrococcus mangiferae
Similar to R invadens, body without tuft of hairs in the
anterior region; lateral laments increase in length from
anterior to posterior region.

Rhizoecus and Ripersiella


Very small mealybugs (12 mm in length); body white to
yellowish white; lacking side (lateral) wax laments. Roots
infested with ground mealybugs generally have areas of
white wax present and these mealybugs may be visible with
use of a hand lens.

Saccharicoccus sacchari (Cockerell) (Pink sugarcane


mealybug)
Body elongate oval, often quite large (7 mm); convex in
lateral view; body pink; mealy wax thin, allowing body color
through; without longitudinal bare areas on dorsum; ovisac
ventral; lateral wax laments normally absent, one short pair
may be visible in the newly matured adult females.

Vryburgia amaryllidis (Bouche) (Lily bulb mealybug)


Body elongate oval, sometimes quite large (up to 4 mm);
slightly rounded in lateral view; body light to dark purple;
ostiole secretion clear or light yellow; legs pale; mealy wax
thin, allowing body color through; without longitudinal bare
areas on dorsum; ovisac large, covering body of female; with
two pairs of caudal wax laments, posterior pair longer and
broader than anterior pair, conical about three or four times
longer than the anterior pair, posterior pair about 1/8 length
of body. Occurring at bases of leaves of Haworthia and aloe
and similar hosts; also on the roots and bulbs of other
liliaceous host. Oviparous; eggs pink; surface of lateral
laments rough.

(continued)
70 M. Mani

Table 4.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Field characters Images of mealybug
Vryburgia brevicruris (Short legged mealybug)
Small mealybugs (23 mm long); red to purple; lacking side
(lateral) wax laments; two thick wax laments arising from
tip of the abdomen.

Vryburgia trionymoides (DeLotto)


Color pinkish-purple; with a light coating of white wax over
the body; and thick white laments arising from the tip of
the abdomen. The pinkish-purple body color may be
obscured by the powdery wax coating.

Stemmatomerinx acircula
Body gray with white wax; about 23 mm long; some wax
seems to be lamentous; no lateral wax laments produced.

Trionymus haancheni (Barley mealybug)


Adult female is quite small reaching a length of
approximately 1/5 in. (5 mm); body in some cases covered
with a white waxy secretion that extends as thin wispy
laments along the edges of the body and at the posterior
end; body shape elongate-oval, segmented, rather slender,
and with well-developed legs.

The number of wax laments protruding from The second type is root mealybugs/soil mealy-
the side of the body. bugs/subterranean mealybugs living in the soil
Presence and length of wax laments at the and feeding on the roots.
end of the body (i.e., terminal wax laments).
Color of eggs (if present).
Presence of an ovisac (a waxy mass covering 4.4 Role of Taxonomy
the eggs). in Management
Stripes on the body. of Mealybugs
Color of uids when crushed.
Success in pest management tactics including the
There are two types of mealybugs. One is leaf biological control programs depends on the cor-
mealybugs/foliar mealybugs/arboreal mealybugs rect identication of both the biological control
infesting the plant parts above the ground level. agent and the pest species. In last few decades,
4 Taxonomy 71

there have been more than ve major outbreaks Acerophagus coccois Smith (Bento et al. 1999).
of mealybugs causing alarming damage to crops, The most trenchant point concerning the parthe-
as a result of accidental introduction. nogenetic species P. manihoti is that an outbreak
The pink cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus could occur in southern Asia with the accidental
manihoti Matile-Ferrero, appeared on cassava in introduction of just a single immature specimen.
Africa in 1973 and soon spread throughout the Following the introduction of the cassava mealy-
whole cassava belt. To locate the source of this bug into Africa, another introduced mealybug
mealybug and to compare it with a morphologi- appeared in West Africa in 19811982, causing
cally similar species, which causes almost identi- extensive damage to fruit trees including mango.
cal damage to cassava in northern Brazil and This mealybug was initially identied as an
Guyana, required a considerable amount of time. undescribed species already known from India
Specimens from Africa and northern South and Pakistan and was later described as
America on the microscope slides showed wide Rastrococcus invadens Williams (Williams 1986).
variation in characters, and the method adopted This species is usually scarce in some parts of
to ascertain any limits to this variation required India because it is controlled by the natural ene-
rearing cultures in the laboratory at different tem- mies (Narasimham and Chako 1988); the intro-
peratures. This method normally induces wide duction of the encyrtid Gyranusoidea tebyi Noyes
morphological variation in mealybugs, helping to from India to West Africa and its swift control of
determine the limits of environmentally induced the mealybug are hailed as another biological
variation (Cox 1982; Cox and Williams 1981). control success (Neuenschwander et al. 1994).
The knowledge that the species in Africa was Another mealybug species was introduced
pink-bodied and uniparental and the species from accidentally to the Caribbean area in 199394
northern Brazil and Guyana was yellow-bodied and has since then spread beyond, eventually
and biparental (later described as Phenacoccus reaching USA. This damaging species was rap-
herreni Cox and Williams) was obscured initially idly identied by taxonomists as Maconellicoccus
because the specimens used for this study were hirsutus (Green); its biological control was
dead and had been preserved in spirit, obscuring described in detail by Kairo et al. (2000), with
the body color. When the two species could be discussion of the costs and benets. M. hirsutus
identied satisfactorily on the microscope slides, is widely distributed throughout the southern
it became apparent that the pink cassava mealy- Asia, Africa, and other parts of the Old World
bug, P. manihoti, was present in Paraguay and including Australia, and is still causing damage
Bolivia (Williams et al. 1981); hence, a search for in some parts of India. The introduced natural
natural enemies could be implemented there. The enemies, mainly the parasitoids Anagyrus kamali
introduction of the parasitoid Apoanagyrus lopezi Moursi (already known in the Old World) and
(De Santis) from South America to Africa and the Gyranusoidea indica Shafee, Alam and Agarwal
success of the biological control program against (collected in Egypt), and the predator
P. manihoti were well documented by Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant, have
Neuenschwander and Herren (1988) and Herren brought the mealybug under control. In response
and Neuenschwander (1991). Thus, the taxo- to this outbreak, an identication manual for the
nomic information can be retrieved in case the area (Watson & Chandler 1999) and a taxonomic
mealybug introductions originate from this area. study of all the instars of M. hirsutus (Miller
Phenacoccus manihoti remains a threat to the 2002) were produced.
cassava areas of southern Asia, as does the yellow Yet another mealybug is causing concern in
cassava mealybug, P. herreni, which still causes the Caribbean area Paracoccus marginatus
problems in South America. Reduction of P. her- Williams and Granara de Willink, described from
reni populations is now under way, mainly Mexico and parts of Central America as recently
through the introduction of the parasitoids as 1992, has become a serious pest in the
Apoanagyrus diversicomis (Howard) and Caribbean islands, where it attacks numerous
72 M. Mani

Table 4.2 List of mealybug species, correct identity of which led to a successful biological control
Country of accidental Introduced parasitoid for classical biological
Mealybug species introduction control
Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero Africa Apoanagyrus lopezi (De Santis)
Phenacoccus herreni Cox and South America Apoanagyrus diversicornis (Howard)
Williams
Rastrococcus invadens Williams West Africa Gyranusoidea tebyi Noyes
Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green USA Anagyrus kamali Moursi
Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Caribbean islands Acerophagus papayae Noyes and Schauff
Granara de Willink Pseudleptomastix mexicana Noyes and Schauff
Anagyrus loecki Noyes and Menezes
Paracoccus marginatus Williams and India Acerophagus papayae Noyes and Schauff
Granara de Willink Pseudleptomastix mexicana Noyes and Schauff
Anagyrus loecki Noyes and Menezes

plant species, especially papaya (Carica papaya). come under the existing keys, it may be named as
The mealybug has now reached the southern a new species.
USA. A search for natural enemies in Mexico
(Becker 2000) located three parasitoids that are Acknowledgement Dr. Sunil Joshi, Principal Scientist,
now in use in controlling the mealybug. An off- NBAIR, Bangalore is acknowledged for providing
information.
shoot of the biological control program has been
a detailed study of all the instars of P. marginatus
by Miller et al. (2005). The mealybug had
References
affected Carica papaya and several other plants
in Guam, Sri Lanka, Palau, India; in all countries, A SA (1968) Morphology and taxonomy of the adult
the species was rapidly identied as P. margin- males of the families Pseudococcidae and Eriococcidae
atus by taxonomists facilitating quick introduc- (Homoptera: Coccoidea). Bull Brit Mus (Nat Hist)
Entomol Suppl 13:1210
tion of the parasitoids.
Arve S, Patel KG, Chavan S (2012) Phenacoccus sole-
Table 4.2 shows a list of mealybug species, nopsis: the white menace to global agriculture: popu-
which were introduced in some countries, and the lation dynamics, biology and chemical control of
parasitoid, whose correct identity led to a suc- mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley on
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. LAP LAMBERT Academic
cessful classical biological control.
Publishing, 156 p
The examples mentioned above show that the Beardsley JW (1965) Notes on the pineapple mealybug
new pest species that may have escaped detection complex with descriptions of two new species
at quarantine inspection of imported plant (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Proc Hawaii Entomol
Soc 19(1):56
material can be quickly recognized by the taxon-
Becker H (2000) Three alien wasps may curb scale pest.
omists and accurately identied. The taxonomists Agric Res 58:1617
can also suggest the correct area of the origin of Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
the pest and report whether any existing speci- bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
mens in slide collections were parasitized, so that
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
the precise collection localities can be searched importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
for natural enemies for use in classical biological Ben-Dov Y, Miller DR, Gibson GAP (2006) ScaleNet: a
control. This information requires access to database of the scale insects of the world. In: United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA). http://
important reference collections of insects and to
www.sel.barc.usda.gov/scalenet/scalenet.htm
the relevant taxonomic literature. The above eld Borchsenius NS (1947) On the taxonomic signicance of
guides and taxonomic information are to be morphological characters of mealybugs (Coccoidea,
referred for the quick tentative identication up Pseudococcus). Akad Nauk Dok SSSR (Moscow) (In
Russian) 58:21092110
to the species level. If the specimen does not
4 Taxonomy 73

Bento JMS, de Moraes GJ, Bellotti AC, Castillo JA, Koteja J (1974b) On the phylogeny and classication of
Warumby JF, Lapointe SL (1999) Introduction of par- the scale insects (Homoptera, Coccinea) (discussion
asitoids for the control of the cassava mealybug based on morphology of the mouthparts). Acta Zool
Phenacoccus herreni (Hemiptera Pseudococcidae) in Cracov 19:267325
north-eastern Brazil. Bull Entomol Res 89:403410 Koteja J (2008) Xylococcidae and related groups
Borchsenius NS (1948) Notes on Pseudococcus com- (Hemiptera: Coccinea) from Baltic amber (In English;
stocki (Kuw.) and some allied species (Homoptera; Summary in Polish). Pr Muz Ziemi 49:1956
Coccidea), with descriptions of three new species. Mani M, Joshi S, Kalyansundaram M, Shivaraju C,
Bull Ent Res 39:417421 Krishnamoorthy A, Asokan R, Rebijith KB (2013)
Borchsenius NS (1949) Fauna of USSR Homoptera, A new invasive Jack Beardsleyi mealybug, Pseudococcus
Pseudococcidae. Akad Nauk Zool Inst 38(7):383 jackbeardsleyi (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on papaya
Cockerell TDA (1905) Some Coccidae from the Philippine in India. Florida Entomol 96(1):242245
Islands. Proc Davenport Acad Sci 10:127136 McKenzie HL (1967) Mealybugs of California with tax-
Cox JM (1982) Revision of the New Zealand onomy, biology and control of North American spe-
Pseudococcidae (Homoptera: Coccidea) with an cies (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae).
experimental study of morphological variation. Thesis University of California Press, Berkeley, 524 pp
submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Melville RV (1983) Opinion 1247 Dactylopius Costa,
the University of London and for the Diploma of (Nov. 1829) and Pseudococcus Westwood, 1840
Membership of the Imperial College, London, 388 pp (Insecta Homoptera): designation of type species. Bull
Cox JM, Williams DJ (1981) An account of cassava Zool Nomencl 40:7780
mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) with a Miller DR (1999) 2002. Identication of the Pink Hibiscus
description of a new species. Bull Entomol Res Mealybug Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green)
71:247258 (Hemiptera: Stemorrhyncha: Pseudococcidae). Insecta
Downie DA, Gullan PJ (2004) Phylogenetic analysis of Mundi 13:189203
mealybugs (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae) Miller DR (1975) Dactylopius Costa, 1835 and Pseudococcus
based on DNA sequences from three nuclear genes, Westwood, 1840 (Insecta Homoptera): proposed desig-
and a review of the higher classication. Syst Entomol nation of type-species under the plenary powers with pro-
29:238259 posed suppression of Diaprosteci Costa, 1828. ZN. (S.)
Downie DA, Gullan PJ (2005) Phylogenetic congruence 2056. Bull Zool Nomencl 31:146153
of mealybug and their primary endosymbionts. J Evol Miller DR, Miller GL, Hodges GS, Davidson JA (2005)
Biol 18(2):315324 Introduced scale insects Hemiptera: Coccoidea) of the
Ezzat YM, McConnell HS (1956) The mealybug tribe United States and their impact on U.S. agriculture.
Planococcini (Pseudococcidae: Homoptera). Bulletin Proc Entomol Soc Wash 107(1):123158
A (Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station), Narasimham AU, Chako MJ (1988) Rastrococcus spp.
University of Maryland, Agricultural Experiment (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and their natural ene-
Station, College Park, no. 84, 108 p mies in India as potential biocontrol agents for R.
Ferris GF (1950) Atlas of the scale insects of North invadens Williams. Bull Entomol Res 78:703708
America (series V). The pseudococcidae (Part I). NBAII (2011) Annual report, National Bureau of
Stanford University Press, Stanford, 278 p Agriculturally Important Insects (ICAR), Post Box
Gullan PJ, Martin JH (2003) Sternorrhyncha (jumping No. 2491, H.A. Farm Post, Bellary Road, Bangalore
plant-lice, whiteies, aphids and scale insects). In: (Karnataka, India), 136 p
Resh VH, Carde RT (eds) Enclyclopedia of insects. Neuenschwander P, Herren HR (1988) Biological control
Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 10791089 of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti, by
Hardy NB, Gullan PJ, Hodgson CJ (2008) A subfamily- the exotic parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi in Africa.
level classication of mealybugs (Hemiptera: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 318:319333
Pseudococcidae) based on integrated molecular and Neuenschwander P, Boavida C, Bokonon-Ganta GA,
morphological data. Syst Entomol 33(1):5171 Herren HR (1994) Establishment and spread of
Herren HR, Neuenschwander P (1991) Biological control Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes and Anagyrus mangicola
of cassava pests in Africa. Annu Rev Entomol Noyes (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), two biological
36:257283 control agents released against the mango Mealybug
Keifer HH (1946) Isopropyl alcohol and phenol used in Rastrococcus invadens (Homoptera: Pseudocaccidae)
entomological mi9cro-technique. J Econ Entomol in Africa. Biocontrol Sci Technol 4:6169
39(5):655666 Neuenschwander P, Herren HR (1988) Biological control
Kairo MTK, Pollard GV, Peterkin DD, Lopez VF (2000) of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti, by
Biological control of the hibiscus mealybug, the exotic parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi in Africa.
Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green (Hemiptera: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 318:319333
Pseudococcidiae) in the Caribbean. Integr Pest Manag Thao ML, Gullan PJ, Baumann P (2002) Secondary
Rev 5:241254 (-Proteobacteria) endosymbionts infect the primary
Koteja J (1974a) Comparative studies on the labium in the (-Proteobacteria) endosymbionts of mealybugs mul-
Coccinea (Homoptera). Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii tiple times and coevolve with their hosts. Appl Environ
Rolniczej w Krakowie 27:1162 Microbiol 68:31903197
74 M. Mani

Watson GW, Chandler LR (1999) Identication of mealy- Williams DJ (1985) Australian mealybugs. British
bugs in the Caribbean Region. CAB International, Museum (Natural History), London, 431p
Egham, 40 pp Williams DJ (1986) The identity and distribution of the
Westwood JO (1840) Synopsis of the genera of British genus Maconellicoccus Ezzat (Hemiptera:
Insects. [Appendix to]. An introduction to the modern Pseudococcidae) in Africa. Bull Entomol Res
classication of insects, founded on the natural habits 16:351357
and corresponding organisation of different families, Williams DJ, Granara de Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs
vol. 2, London, Longman, Orme, Brown, Green, and of Central and South America. CAB International,
Longmans, Paternoster-Row. 158 p Wallingford, 635 pp
Wilkey RF (1962) A simplied technique for clearing, Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
staining and permanently mounting small arthropods. Natural History Museum/Southdene Sdn. Bhd,
Ann Entomol Soc Am 55(5):606 London/Kaula Lumpur, 896 p
Williams DJ, Cox JM, Yaseen M (1981) The cassava Williams DJ, Granara de Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs
mealybug and its parasites in Paraguay and Bolivia. of Central and South America. CAB International,
Biocontrol News Inf 2:88 Wallingford, 635p
Molecular Identication
of Mealybugs 5
K.B. Rebijith, R. Asokan, and N.K. Krishna Kumar

Insects are the numerous life forms that have cap- has been a monumental task which calls for the
tured the attention of human beings since ancient availability of more specialists and funding. But
times. In the same context, proper classication with the dwindling interest in taxonomy and fund
and identication of life forms has been a chal- availability, the classication and identication
lenge, and a plausible method of classication of various life forms, particularly insects, has
was established by Carlous Linnaeus, a Swedish been a major challenge to the scientic commu-
botanist who published Systema Naturae in 1758. nity. With the advent of molecular biology and
However, the Linnaeus system of classication molecular tools, the identication of life forms,
was not based on evolutionary relationships including insects, has become quick, precise and
among the target groups. Later, Darwins The easy. The development of species-specic mark-
Origin of Species in 1859 changed the way life ers enables even a non-specialist to identify
forms were classied, where the identication, insects to the species level.
description and explanation of the diversity of
the organisms had come to be known as system-
atics. According to Mayr and Ashlock (1991), 5.1 Methods of Classication
systematics is the scientic study of the kinds and and Identication
diversity of organisms, and any and all relation-
ships among them; taxonomy, on the other hand, 5.1.1 Linnaean System
was the theory and practice of the classication
of organisms. It took 200 years for taxonomists Taxonomists assess the physical characteristics
to describe the 1.7 million species on the earth, that a set of species shares and selects the most
which is only 10 % of the total number of species representative species to be the type for each
estimated. In this context, identication of insects genus, and the most representative genus to be
the type of the family and so on. Individual speci-
mens are deposited in museums to serve as a ref-
K.B. Rebijith R. Asokan (*) erence for that species and genus. When new
Division of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of species are found with similar traits, they are cat-
Horticultural Research, Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: rebijith@gmail.com; asokaniihr@gmail.com
egorized as part of a known species as a new spe-
cies, or as a new genus, depending on how closely
N.K.K. Kumar
Indian Council for Agricultural Research,
the new specimens resemble the type. The reli-
New Delhi, India ance of types results in dramatic changes if a
e-mail: ddghort@gmail.com taxonomist re-evaluates a group and decides that

Springer India 2016 75


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_5
76 K.B. Rebijith et al.

some members do not belong and suggest that the ing to higher extinction rates and the introduction
group name must be changed. of invasive species of pests. Therefore, there is a
need for faster species identication and infor-
mation about their biodiversity for conserving
5.1.2 Cladistics them before they vanish from the face of the
earth. Undoubtedly, the contribution of morpho-
During the 1980s, another classication method logical taxonomy is enormous, but it also has
called cladistics, which is based on the evolution- some drawbacks, such as the following:
ary histories of organisms, was proposed. This
method is based on phylogeny, whereas the Incorrect identication due to phenotypic
Linnaean system is not. plasticity and genetic variability between dif-
ferent taxa of mealybugs
There are many morphologically cryptic taxa
5.1.3 Phylocode which are common in many groups
Morphological examination is time consum-
In this system, the genus name is removed, and ing and is often effective only for a particular
species name is shortened and hyphenated with life stage or gender (mostly in adult females in
their former genus name or given numeric case of mealybugs). As a result, many cannot
identication. be identied
Although modern interactive versions repre-
sent a major advance, the use of keys require
5.2 Shortfalls in Morphological high level of expertise that often lead to mis-
Identication identication (Hebert et al. 2003a)
Taxonomists have always looked for discon-
Mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) are the tinuous character variations that could signal
major pests in a wide range of agricultural crops divergence between species. The debate on
as well as ornamental plants worldwide (Millar threshold values employing molecular identi-
2002; Miller et al. 2002, 2005). These sap- cation for interspecic divergence is also
sucking insects have been studied intensively for true in the case of morphology-based
decades because of the economic losses they identication.
cause to agriculture through direct physical dam- Early identication of new invasions is an
age to crop plants, as well as by vectoring many important aspect in preventing the spread.
plant pathogenic viruses, which in turn decreases Rapid and accurate identication of mealy-
yield quality (Meyer et al. 2008 and Nakaune bugs is not easily accomplished with conven-
et al. 2008). The family Pseudococcidae consists tional taxonomy. Taxonomy separation of
of more than 2000 described species in 270 gen- many species occurring together can be dif-
era (Downie and Gullan 2004). Current estimates cult, particularly for the nymphal stages that
suggest that the earth may have anywhere from are primarily involved
10 to more than 40 million species of organisms,
but only about 1.7 million of them have actually Hence, there is a need for an adjunct tool that
been described. It includes over 7,50,000 insects, facilitates rapid identication of species where
and it took 250 years for taxonomists to catego- molecular identication, popularly called DNA
rize all 1.7 million species, which comprise only barcoding, becomes handy. The concept of
10 % of the total species on earth (Hebert and DNA barcoding was proposed by Hebert et al.
Gregory 2005). Classifying the remaining 90 % (2003b, c) as a rapid and precise way for species
of the unidentied organisms will require more discrimination of a broad range of biological
time and expertise of taxonomists to complete specimens using a selected 658-bp fragment of
this monumental task. Economic development the 5 end of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxi-
and increased international commerce are lead- dase-I (mtCO-I) gene (Fig. 5.1).
5 Molecular Identication of Mealybugs 77

Fig. 5.1 (a) Organization of genes in mitochondrial and primer region (brown) with amino- and carboxy-
genome. (b) Arrangements of barcode region with mito- terminal spanning inside
chondrial membrane with barcode region (blue in colour)

5.2.1 Uses of DNA Barcoding cies whether abundant or rare, native or inva-
sive, engendering appreciation of biodiversity,
Works with fragments: Barcoding can identify locally and globally (Stoeckle et al. 2004).
a species from bits and pieces. When estab- Opens the way for an electronic hand-held
lished, barcoding will quickly identify unde- eld guide, the Life Barcoder: Barcoding links
sirable animal or plant material in processed biological identication to advancing frontiers
foodstuffs and detect commercial products in DNA sequencing, miniaturization in elec-
derived from regulated species (Stoeckle et al. tronics, and computerized information storage
2004). (Stoeckle et al. 2004).
Works for all stages of life: Barcoding can Demonstrates value of collections: Compiling
identify a species in its many forms, from eggs the library of barcodes begins with the multi-
and seed, through larvae and seedlings, to million specimens in museums, herbaria, zoos
adults and owers (Rebijith et al. 2012). and gardens and other biological repositories
Unmasks look-alikes: Barcoding can distin- (Stoeckle et al. 2004).
guish among species that look alike, uncover- Speeds up writing the encyclopaedia of life:
ing dangerous organisms masquerading as Compiling a library of barcodes linked to the
harmless ones, and enabling a more accurate vouchered specimens and their binomial
view of biodiversity (Asokan et al. 2011). names will enhance public access to biologi-
Reduces ambiguity: Written as a sequence of cal knowledge, helping to create an on-line
four discrete nucleotides CATG along a encyclopaedia of life on earth, with a webpage
uniform locality on genomes, a barcode of life for every species of plant and animal (Stoeckle
provides a digital identifying feature, supple- et al. 2004).
menting the more analog gradations of words,
shapes and colours (Stoeckle et al. 2004). The core idea of barcoding is based on the fact
Democratizes access: A standardized library that short pieces of DNA vary only to very a
of barcodes will empower many more people minor degree within the species, and that the
to call by name the species around them. It variation is much less between different species.
will make possible the identication of spe- Therefore, a threshold value of variation could be
78 K.B. Rebijith et al.

characterized for each taxonomic group (212 mitochondrial, is unlikely to yield data that are
%), above which groups of individuals do not balanced, universally acceptable, or sufcient in
belong to the same species, but form supra- taxonomic scope to recognize many species lin-
species taxon. Therefore, unknown individuals eages (Rubinoff 2006). Mitochondrial cyto-
could be assigned to a species level. chrome c oxidase subunit I (mtCO-I) gene
sequence is suitable for this role because its
mutation rate is often fast enough to distinguish
5.3 Targets for Molecular closely related species, and also because its
Identication sequence is conserved among conspecics and a
lack of recombination. mtCO-I sequence differ-
5.3.1 Mitochondrial DNA ences are too small to be detected between closely
related species; more than 2 % sequence diver-
Mitochondrial (mt) DNA (Fig. 5.2) has a long gence has been detected between such organ-
history of use at the species level; recent analyses isms, proving the barcode effective. However,
suggest that the use of a single gene, particularly the rate of evolution of cox1 is very slow.

Fig. 5.2 Flowchart showing steps in DNA barcoding of mealybugs, from collection to sequence deposition in iBOL
5 Molecular Identication of Mealybugs 79

5.4 Advantages of Using phenol:chloroform method and (d) salting out


Mitochondrial Genome method.

Haploid mode of inheritance, and it supports 5.5.1.1 Direct Buffer Method


less recombination A single insect can be crushed in 50200 L
Mitochondrial genome does not have introns YNES (50 mM TrisHCI, pH 7.5, 0.4 M NaCI,
Universal primers are robust, which can 20 mM EDTA, 0.5 % SDS), STE (0.1 M NaCI,
amplify 5 end in most of the animals, includ- 10 mM Tris, pH 8.61 mM EDTA), GES (0.1 M
ing insects glycine, pH 9, 50 mM NaCI, 1 mM EDTA, 1 %
Rapid evolution allows the discrimination of -mercaptoethanol, 0.5 % Triton X-100) or
not only closely related species but also phylo- CTAB (100 mM TrisHCL, pH8,1.4 M NaCI, 20
graphic groups within a single species mM EDTA, 2%CTAB, 0.2 % -mercaptoethanol)
In animal mitochondrial genome, the 13 pro- buffer. The sample is to be incubated at 94 C for
tein coding genes are better targets because of 12 min, with the cell debris to be precipitated by
rare insertions and deletions (indels) spinning it at 13,000 rpm for 1 min. The extracted
By identifying amino acid substitution pat- DNA is to be stored at 20 C.
terns of mtCO1, it is possible to assign any
undened organisms to a higher taxonomic 5.5.1.2 Spot-PCR Method
group before examining nucleotide substitu- A single insect should be crushed on a positively
tions to determine its species identity charged nylon membrane soaked in a 50-mM
NaOH and 2.5-mM EDTA solution, and then
allowed to dry. A small portion (ca. 3 mm2) of the
5.5 Collection spotted membrane is to be cut out and placed in
and Morphological 1050 L TNES, STE, GES or CTAB buffer
Identication (described above). The sample can then be incu-
bated at 95 C for 10 min and cooled on ice.
Mealybug specimens can be collected in 95 % Extracted DNA can be stored at 20 C.
ethanol and kept at 80 C (deep freezer) until
further work. Morphological identication can 5.5.1.3 Phenol/Chloroform Method
be carried out by a taxonomist. Whenever possi- DNA from a single insect can be extracted using
ble, it is better to analyse at least three specimens the modication of a general procedure for
collected from each of the host/locality for extraction with phenol (Sambrook et al. 1989;
reproducibility. Sambrook and Russell 2001). The insect is to be
crushed and incubated at 40 C in 0.6 mg/mL
Proteinase K and 300 L TNES buffer for 418
5.5.1 Genomic DNA Isolation h. DNA can then be puried by washing with
organic solvents: once with a chloroform:isoamyl
Total genomic DNA can be extracted from indi- mix (24:1 v/v); once with a chloroform:phenol
vidual mealybugs using a non-destructive method mix (1:1 v/v) and once with chloroform only.
(Hajibabaei et al. 2006), while voucher speci- DNA can then be precipitated with absolute etha-
mens are required to be mounted on glass slides nol. Extracted DNA can be stored at 20 C.
and deposited with any of the National Insect
Repository such as the National Pusa Collection 5.5.1.4 Salting-Out Method
(NPC) or the Indian Agricultural Research DNA from a single whole insect can be extracted
Institute (IARI), Delhi. Various DNA isolation using the protocol of Sunnucks and Hales (1996)
protocols are available, namely (a) direct TNES with minor adjustments, including the following:
buffer method, (b) spot-PCR method, (c) the insect can be incubated at 40 C in 0.6 mg/mL
80 K.B. Rebijith et al.

Proteinase K and TNES buffer; and the samples DNA Analyzer; Applied Biosystems, USA) using
can be left for at least 1 h at 20 C during pre- PCR specic primers, both in forward and reverse
cipitation of the DNA with absolute ethanol. directions. Homology search and sequence align-
Extracted DNA can be stored at 20 C. ment can be performed employing the NCBI-
BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and
BioEdit version 7.0.9.0 (Hall 1999), respectively.
5.5.2 Polymerase Chain Reaction All the sequences generated in the respective
studies need to be deposited in the NCBI-
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was developed GenBank and the Barcode of Life Data systems
by Kary B. Mullis (Mullis and Faloona 1987) and (BOLD) (Table 5.2).
has radically changed molecular research and
diagnostics (Caterino et al. 2000). PCR involves
the in vitro synthesis of large amounts of DNA 5.6 Nuclear Copies
copies from a single starting molecule and of Mitochondrial Genes
employs short single strands of DNA (1830
nucleotides) called oligomers or primers (Table There is a possibility that a pseudogene is being
5.1) to select a region of specic interest from the amplied if the study encounters the following
DNA. Once the primers are annealed to the DNA, anomalies (Zhang and Hewitt 1996):
Taq DNA polymerase builds a complementary
strand extending from the primer by incorporat- More than one bands, or different bands, are
ing free deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP: constantly produced during PCR
base + deoxyribose sugar + phosphate) molecules amplication.
in the reaction mix. Two primers that anneal on Background peaks or sequence ambiguities
complementary strands are used, with the Taq are constantly found when sequencing.
extending the region between them. The reaction The DNA sequence contains data which will
mixture is cycled between different temperature unexpectedly change the polymerase transla-
optima for the different stages of reaction of tion of the sequence, such as unusual frame-
denaturation, annealing and elongation. This pro- shifts, insertion/deletion or stop codons.
cess is repeated in a number of cycles (usually The DNA sequence is particularly more diver-
3040), and the DNA thus produced increases gent than expected.
exponentially (Saccaggi 2006). Phylogenetic analysis results in unusual,
unexplained or contradictory tree topology.

5.5.3 Sequence Analyses In the recent past, DNA barcoding has gained
and Submission importance in the species diagnosis of animal
species, but has some difculty with certain
The amplied products can be eluted using an insects. This is probably due to its inconsistency
extraction kit according to the manufacturers in amplifying the 5- mtCOI region; however, a
protocol, and the sequencing can be done in an total of 178 mtCOI sequences for 29 mealybug
automated sequencer (ABI prism 3730 XL species are available with the NCBI-GenBank.

Table 5.1 Primers employed in DNA barcoding of mealybugs


mtCO-I Sequence Amplicon Size (bp) Reference
LCO-1490 5-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3 658 bp Folmer et al. (1994)
HCO-2198 5-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3
PcoF1 5- CCTTCAACTAATCATAAAAATATYAG-3 649 bp Park et al. (2010a)
LepR1 5- TAAACTTCTGGATGTCCAAAAAATCA-3
5 Molecular Identication of Mealybugs 81

Table 5.2 Maximum composite likelihood estimate of and biotypes (Shufran et al. 2000). In this regard,
the pattern of nucleotide substitution from 29 species of
sequence analyses revealed that the specimen of
mealybugs
a single species, namely Planococcus cus,
A T C G Crisicoccus matsumotoi, Phenacoccus solani
A - 10.58 2.19 2.4 and P. aceris, from various geographic regions
T 8.03 6.15 1.07
and hosts often showed substantial genetic differ-
C 8.03 29.68 1.07
ence, possibly reecting cryptic species over-
G 18.04 10.58 2.19
looked by current taxonomy classication (Park
The nucleotide frequencies are 0.367 (A), 0.484 (T/U),
et al. 2011). However, further studies are required
0.1 (C) and 0.049 (G). The transition/transversion rate
ratios are k1 = 2.247 (purines) and k2 = 2.805 (pyrimidines). in this direction to clarify these potential cases of
The overall transition/transversion bias is R = 0.443, cryptic mealybug species (Fig. 5.4).
where R = [A*G*k1 + T*C*k2]/[(A + G)*(T + C)]. Codon
positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd + Noncoding
5.7 Limitations of DNA
Barcoding Employing mtCOI
All the above species could be clearly differenti-
ated on the basis of the 5- mtCOI barcode (Fig. Following are the limitations of DNA barcoding
5.3), which is a valuable tool for the identica- employing mtCOI:
tion of these serious insect pests, an approach
complementing classical taxonomy. An insight Limitations in resolving species at species
into the sequence analyses revealed that the G.C boundaries in some groups where nuclear
content in the barcode region is very low (14.9 ribosomal regions are suitable.
%) and is the lowest from any insect species, mtCOI does not show much variation in
which is in total contrast to other lineages (3353 plants, except for some algae.
%) (Min and Hickey 2007; Park et al. 2011). Introgression: mtCOI is largely maternally
Interestingly, the low G.C frequency is more pre- inherited, and usually as a single copy. Hence,
dominant at the third codon (wobble position), it has one fourth the population size of other
than the rst and second position. Among various nuclear genes, has a different inheritance pat-
life forms, the G.C content (12.6 %) for tern and is more sensitive than nuclear genes
Atrococcus paludinus is the lowest value, which to population bottlenecks. mtDNA introgres-
is even lower than bacterial genomes whose G.C sion confounds the boundaries between other-
content is in the range of 1775 %. The lowest wise distinct lineages; such introgression
G.C content (1733 %) occurs in bacterial spe- between species could lead to inaccurate
cies with small genome sizes, especially the identications.
endosymbionts of insects, such as aphids Maternal inheritance: The full effect of mater-
(Andersson and Kurland 1998; Moran et al. nal inheritance on rates of molecular diver-
2008). The lower G.C content in insects such as gence in mtDNA is not predictable, and
scales and mealybugs, feeding on plant sap, a diet therefore the failure rate of DNA barcoding is
which is very decient in organic nitrogen, pos- also unpredictable. mtDNA is inherited mater-
sibly can be explained as an evolutionary adapta- nally, but not in bivalve molluscs which dis-
tion to less nitrogen and relatively less nitrogen is play double unpatented mtDNA inheritance. It
required for A.T than G.C pair. is also evident in a wide range of the taxa
DNA barcoding can be used as an acceptable infrequent paternal inheritance.
system for molecular identication of species in Low recombination: The general absence of
its distinct life stages and forms (Foottit et al. recombination will lead to the persistence of
2010; Rebijith et al. 2012), host-associated population structure long after the barriers
genetic differences (Brunner et al. 2004), dis- which created the structures are removed and
crimination of cryptic species (Smith et al. 2006) gene ow is restored. Therefore, it is not pos-
82 K.B. Rebijith et al.

99
Planococcus kraunhiae (12)
99
Planococcus lilacinus (6)
96
Planococcus ficus (4)

99 JF965419_Planococcus minor
99
Planococcus citri (9)
99
Crisicoccus pini (2)
99
Atrococcus paludinus (3)
99
Pseudococcus calceolariae (7)
99
Dysmicoccus lepelleyi (7)
99
65 Pseudococcus cryptus (5)
98
Pseudococcus com stocki (9)
99
Paracoccus marginatus (7)
99
Balanococcus takahashii (2)
99
Crisicoccus matsumotoi (19)
99
Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi (8)
99
Pseudococcus viburni (3)
99
Dysmicoccus brevipes (3)
99
Dysmicoccus neobrevipes (15)
99
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (4)
99
Palmicultor lumpurensis (3)
99
Ferrisia virgata (2)
99
Ferrisia malvastra (4)
HM474183_Heliococcus puerariae
99
Dysmicoccus wistariae (2)
99
Pseudococcus longispinus (12)
99
Phenacoccus aceris (11)
99
Heliococcus kurilensis (7)
HM474263_Phenacoccus avenae
99
Phenacoccus solani (9)

0.01

Fig. 5.3 NJ tree with bootstrap support (1000 replicates) matsumotoi, Phenacoccus solani and P. aceris showing
showing clusters of species for mtCOI sequences. Distinct two distinct groups with >90 % bootstrap support. The
clades for 29 species of aphids can be seen in the gure, in numbers indicated in brackets represent the individuals
which four species, namely Planococcus cus, Crisicoccus analysed in the corresponding species

sible to estimate species boundaries which tent mutation rate, such as the proposed 23 %
would have been estimated from a broader divergence to correlate with species limit on a
data set. consistent basis. Speciation, uniquely driven
Mutation rate: For the DNA barcode to be by changes in mtDNA or speciation event,
used as standalone, there should be a consis- necessarily alters the mtDNA haplotypes.
5 Molecular Identication of Mealybugs 83

Fig. 5.4 Neighbour joining (NJ) showing intra-specic variation in the barcode region for four species of mealybugs,
namely Planococcus cus (a), Phenacoccus solani (b), Crisicoccus matsumotoi (c) and P. aceris (d)

Heteroplasmy: This refers to the classical barcoding initiative of the animal kingdom will
view of mitochondria functionally haploid produce about 100 million sequences and will be
with multiple identical copies. However, sin- available through GenBank.
gle nucleotide differences are common in An international database called BOLD
some species and are also abundant in some, (Barcode of Life Data system) organizes the
especially at the restriction sites. sequence data on species identication, which
Compounding genetic factors: Coinheritance was initially developed as an informatics work
factors that bias single mitochondrial inheri- bench for a single, high-volume DNA barcode
tance and most obvious are (a) mitochondrial facility. Later, the same has been selected by
selection either on the barcoding gene itself or the Canadian Barcode of Life Network (www.
on the other linked genes; (b) cytoplasmically bolnet.ca) to barcode all the eukaryotic life of
inherited bacteria like Wolbachia and some Canada, and subsequently, it has been adopted
Rickettsia which alter the inheritance factors by major barcode communities like birds,
(Rubinoff et al. 2006). shes, lepidoptera, etc. BOLD provides an inte-
Identication depends on the intra- and inter- grated bioinformatics platform that supports all
specic genetic variations. phases of analytical pathway from specimen
Difcult to resolve, recently diverged species collection to a tightly validated barcode library.
that arose through hybridization. It also provides a vehicle for collaboration
No single gene is conserved in all domains of across research communities by coupling exi-
life and exhibit enough sequence divergence ble security and data entry features with web
for species discrimination. based delivery. A copy of all sequences in
BOLD is also sent to NCBI, DDBJ, and EMBL
There are about 52 million sequence records as soon as the results are ready for public
available currently, and it is expected that the release.
84 K.B. Rebijith et al.

5.8 Other Targets for Molecular In addition to the above reterotransposons, R1


Identication of Insects and R2 have been in the 28S rRNA genes of most
insects, are associated with arthropods, and are
5.8.1 Ribosomal DNA usually precisely located at the same nucleotide
position within the 28S rRNA gene. Most of the
Ribosomes are the major components of cells R2 elements are located about 74 bp upstream
that are involved in translating the mRNA into from the site of R1 insertions. R1 and R2 do not
proteins. Ribosomes consist of both proteins have long terminal repeats and block the produc-
and RNAs. The ribosomal RNA (rRNA) regions tion of functional rRNA, since there are many
that are conserved and more variable regions rRNA genes, and R2 are kept from invading by
can serve as both slow and fast clocks in identi- miRNA/siRNA. Usually, R1 and R2 do not have
fying and unravelling the molecular phylogeny. accumulated mutations that would make them
In eukaryotes (including insects), the genes inactive.
encoding both 18S and 28S rRNA are clustered
as tandem repeats in the nucleolus; in most ani-
mals, there are 100500 copies of rDNA in the 5.8.2 Satellite DNA
nuclear genome in tandemly repeated transcrip-
tion units. The repeated transcription unit is Satellite DNA may consist of a large fraction of
composed of a leader promoter region known as the total DNA in an insect. Microsatellites are
external transcribed spacer region (ETS), 18S usually species specic, and evolve at very high
rDNA coding region, internal transcribed spacer rates. Satellite DNA can also be used for species
region (ITS), 28S rDNA coding region and an identication and analysis of populations.
internal non-coding transcribed spacer region
(IGS). In addition to the above, R1 and R2 retro
transposable elements are found in specic 5.8.3 Nuclear Protein Coding Genes
locations (Fig. 5.5).
Different portions of the repeated transcrip- A variety of protein coding loci have been used
tion units evolve at different rates in the nuclear in molecular systematics, and some of them are
genome; a higher degree of polymorphism is listed below:
found in the non-coding segments (IGS, ITS,
ETS), and the most variable part of the repeated 1. alpha amylase 2. acetyl choline esterase 3.
unit is IGS, which contains reiterated sub-repeats actin 4. alcohol dehydrogenase 5. arylphorin
ranging from 50 to several hundred base pairs in 6. cecropin 7. chorin 8. dopa carbaxylase 9.
length. The coding regions of the repeated unit elongation factor 1 alpha 10. esterase 11. glyc-
change relatively less and can be used for sys- erol 3 phosphate 12. glycerol 6 phosphate
tematic studies of higher taxa or for ancient lin- dehydrogenase 13. guanylate cyclase 14. glo-
eages. Ribosomal RNA genes undergo concerted bin family genes 15. histones 1 and 4 16.
evolution so that the sequence similarity of the hunch back 17. kruppel 18. luciferase 19.
members of an RNA family is expected to be lysozyme intron 20. myosin alkali light
greater within species than between species. chain intron 21. nullo 22. opsin 23. period 24.

18S 28S
IGS ETS ITS

Fig. 5.5 Gene organization of ribosomal genes


5 Molecular Identication of Mealybugs 85

phosphogluco isomerase 25. phosphoenol RAPD data clearly separated the species into
pyruate carboxy kinase 26. prune 27. copper, two groups (Serce et al. 2007).
zinc superoxide dismutase 28. sodium channel 2. Seven species of mealybugs (Ps maritimus,
para locus I 29. snail 30. timeless 31. triose- Ps.vibruni. Ps.longispinus, Ps.calceolariae,
phosphate isomerase 32. vestigial 33. white Pl.cus, Pl.citri, Ferrisia gilli Gullan) were
34. wingless 35. xanthine dehydrogenase 36. identied using a Multiplex PCR based on the
yolk protein 1 and 2 37. zeste. mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit
gene (Daane et al. 2011).
3. There was a slight difference in morphologi-
5.9 Limitations cal characters in the populations of
Planococcus cus, indicating that there are
May be heterozygous and present in low copy two different populations of the same species
numbers. in Tunisian vineyards. Likewise, in the molec-
Many genes contain large introns that makes it ular analyses, two separate clades were
difcult to amplify more than one exon. revealed in the neighbour-joining phyloge-
Many single-copy loci are actually are present netic tree, supporting the morphological stud-
in more than one copy. ies and suggesting there are two distinct
Pseudogenes may create problem if compari- populations of grape vine in Tunisia, which
sons are made inadvertently. might be two different biotypes (Mansour
et al. 2012).
Even with all the limitations, the molecular
identication of insects employing mtCOI is
gaining momentum, and as of now it can be an
effective adjunct tool for the integrated taxon- References
omy. Many barcoding initiatives are beginning to
take shape, such as the recent initiative on Andersson SG, Kurland CG (1998) Reductive evolution
of resident genomes. Trends Microbiol 6:263268
Barcoding of butteries of India funded by the Asokan R, Rebijith KB, Singh SK, Sidhu AS, Siddharthan
Department of Biotechnology. With the increase S, Karanth PK, Ellango R, Ramamurthy VV (2011)
in international trade on agricultural produces Molecular identication and phylogeny of Bactrocera
where the danger of introduction of invasive spe- Species (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla Entomol
94:10261035
cies looms large, DNA barcoding is going to play Brunner PC, Chatzivassilious EK, Katis NI, Frey JE
a vital role in the quick identication of insect- (2004) Host associated genetic differentiation in
pests at the port of entry. As ambitiously envis- Thrips tabaci (Insecta: Thysanoptera), as determined
aged, the development and deployment of the from mtDNA sequence data. Heredity 93:364370
Caterino MS, Cho S, Sperling FAH (2000) The current
hand-held sequencer, which is supported by the state of insect molecular systematics: a thriving tower
global networked database, is going to revolu- of Babel. Ann Rev Entomol 45:154
tionize the way we identify insects that are Daane KM, Middleton MC, Sforza R, Cooper ML, Walton
already described, along with the new ones. VA, Walsh DB, Zaviezo T, Almeida PP (2011)
Development of a multiplex PCR for identication of
vineyard mealybugs. Mol Ecol Evol
40(6):15951603
5.10 Applications Downie DA, Gullan PJ (2004) Phylogenetic analysis of
mealybugs (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae)
based on DNA sequences from three nuclear genes,
1. The relationship of six mealybug species (Pl. and a review of the higher classication. Syst Entomol
citri, Pl.cus, P.ovae, Ps.longispinus, Ps.vibruni, 29:238259
Ph.aceris) was studied using randomly amplied Folmer O, Black M, Hoe W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994)
polymorphic DNA-polymerase chain reaction DNA primers for amplication of mitochondrial cyto-
chrome c oxidase I from diverse metazoan inverte-
(RAPD-PCR) in Turkey. Cluster analyses of brates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3:294299
86 K.B. Rebijith et al.

Foottit RG, Maw HEL, Pike KS, Miller RH (2010) The Park DS, Suh SJ, Oh HW, Heber PDN (2010) Recovery of
identity of Pentalonia nigronervosa and P. caladii van the mitochondrial COI barcode region in diverse
der Goot (Hemiptera: Aphididae) based on molecular Hexapoda through tRNA-based primers. BMC
and morphometric analysis. Zootaxa 2358:2538 Genomics 11:423
Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Park DS, Suh SJ, Hebert PDN, Oh HW, Hong KJ (2011)
Hebert PDN (2006) DNA barcodes distinguish species DNA barcodes for two scale insect families, mealy-
of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A bugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidea) and armored scales
103:968971 (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Bull Entomol Res
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence 101:429434
alignment editor and analysis program for Windows Rebijith KB, Asokan R, Krishna Kumar NK, Srikumar
95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:9598 KK, Ramamurthy VV, Shivarama Bhat P (2012) DNA
Hebert PDN, Gregory TR (2005) The promise of DNA barcoding and development of species-specic mark-
barcoding for taxonomy. Syst Biol 54:852859 ers for the identication of Tea mosquito bugs
Hebert PDW, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003a) (Miridae: Heteroptera) in India. Environ Entomol
Biological identication through DNA barcodes. Proc 41:12391245
Roy Soc Lond B 270:313321 Rubinoff D (2006) Utility of mitochondrial DNA bar-
Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR (2003b) codes in species conservation. Conserv Biol
Biological identications through DNA barcodes. 20:10261033
Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 270:313322 Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K (2006) A genomic
Hebert PDN, Ratnasignham S, deWaard JR (2003c) perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial
Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 DNA for Barcoding identification. J Hered 97:
divergences among closely related species. Proc Roy 581594
Soc Lond Ser B 270(Suppl. 1):S96S99 Saccaggi DC (2006) Development of molecular tech-
Mansour R, Cavalleri V, Mazzeo G, Lebdi KG, Russo A niques to identify mealybugs (Hemiptera:
(2012) A morphological and molecular characteriza- Pseudococcidae) of importance on grapevine in South
tion of vine populations (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae) Africa. University of Pretoria, Pretoria
from Tunisia. J Entomol Acarol Res 44(e5):2427 Sambrook J, Russell M (2001) Molecular cloning: a labo-
Mayr E, Ashlock PD (1991) Principles of systematic zool- ratory manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
ogy, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York Press, New York
Meyer JB, Kasdorf GGF, Nel LH, Pietersen G (2008) Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular
Transmission of activated-episomal banana streak ol cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring
(badna) virus (bsolv) to cv. Williams banana (musa sp.) Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1659p
by three mealybug species. Plant Dis 92:11581163 Serce CU, Kaydan MB, Kilincer AN, Ertunce F (2007)
Millar IM (2002) Mealybug genera (Hemiptera: Investigation of mealybug (Hemiptera: Coccoidea:
Pseudococcidae) of South Africa: identication and Pseudicoccidae) species from Turkey by
review. Afr Entomol 10:185233 RAPD. Phytoparasitica 35(3):232238
Miller DR, Miller GL, Watson GW (2002) Invasive spe- Shufran KA, Burd JD, Anstead JA, Lushai G (2000)
cies of mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and Mitochondrial DNA sequencedivergence among
their threat to US agriculture. Proc Entomol Soc Wash greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae) biotypes: evidence
104:825836 for hostadapted races. Insect Mol Biol 9:179184
Miller DR, Miller GL, Hodges GS, Davidson JA (2005) Smith MA, Woodley NE, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W,
Introduced scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) of Hebert PDN (2006) DNA barcodes reveal cryptic
the United States and their impact on us agriculture. host-specicity within the presumed polyphagous
Proc Entomol Soc Wash 107:123158 members of a genus of parasitoid ies (Diptera:
Min XJ, Hickey DA (2007) DNA barcodes provide a Tachinidae). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
quick preview of mitochondrial genome composition. 103:36573662
PLoS ONE 2(3), e325 Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM (2004)
Moran NA, McCutcheon JP, Nakabachi A (2008) Identication of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS
Genomics and evolution of heritable bacterial symbi- Biol 2(10), e312
onts. Ann Rev Genet 42:165190 Sunnucks P, Hales DF (1996) Numerous transposed
Mullis KB, Faloona FA (1987) Specic synthesis of DNA sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I-II in
in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. aphids of the genus Sitobion (Hemiptera: Aphididae).
Methods Enzymol 155:335350 Mol Biol Evol 13:510524
Nakaune R, Toda S, Mochizuki M, Nakano M (2008) Zhang DX, Hewitt GD (1996) Nuclear integrations: chal-
Identication and characterization of a new vitivirus lenges for mitochondrial DNA markers. Tree
from grapevine. Arch Virol 153:18271832 11:247251
Biology
6
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

A few generalizations on the biology of mealy- citri (Risso). To attract adult males, the females
bugs are derived primarily from the detailed stud- emit a sex pheromone. Female mealybugs mate
ies of the work previously done on common multiple times and the number of times they mate
mealybug species. There are slight variations in also affects the egg production. Parthenogenetic
the biology of mealybugs among the species. reproduction is also observed in many mealybug
species, while in some others, reproduction is by
both sexual and parthenogenetic means.
6.1 Reproduction Most mealybug species reproduce sexually, as
well as lay eggs. However, some species such as
The mature or gravid adult female begins to grow in Phenacoccus solani Ferris, Phenacoccus parvus
size as the ovaries develop, ending at about 45 mm Morrison and Ferrisia malvastra (McDaniel)
in length and far less dorso-ventrally attened. The reproduce parthenogenically and others, for exam-
adult male is about 1.5 mm in length, with long ple, Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Tozzetti)
wings, a brown-coloured body and two multi-seg- and Antonina graminis (Maskell) are ovovivipa-
mented antennae that are about half the length of rous. Two different genetic systems may be found
the body. Mealybugs have the lecanoid type of the in mealybugs; the more common corresponds to a
paternal genome elimination system, where both particular type of haplodiploidy known as paternal
sexes develop from fertilized eggs (i.e., diploidy), genome elimination in which both males and
but during the early stage of development of the females develop from fertilized eggs. The male
male, the paternal half is deactivated through het- develops from a zygote containing one haploid
erochromatinization. This system suggests that the genome from his mother and one haploid genome
females would produce a male-biased sex ratio from his father, but only the maternal genome is
when alone and a more female-biased sex ratio transmitted to the offspring via the sperm, because
when grouped with other females. Mealybug repro- the set of chromosomes of paternal origin becomes
duction can be quite variable. For some mealybugs, heterochromatic and genetically inactive. Male
mating is probably necessary, although facultative mealybugs are thus functionally haploid, owing to
parthenogenesis has been reported for Planococcus heterochromatization (parahaploidy). The other
genetic system is thelytokous parthenogenesis, in
which there are no males and therefore no mating
M. Mani (*) C. Shivaraju
occurs. There are no sex chromosomes in mealy-
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India bugs; sex is probably determined by a functional
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in haploidy/diploidy mechanism, which seems to be

Springer India 2016 87


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_6
88 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

dependent on the behaviour of a set of chromo- The male is holometabolic and develops
somes and not on a single chromosome. If hetero- through four stages, egg, larva (two nymphal
chromatization of an entire set of chromosomes instars), pupa and adult, while the female is
takes place during the cleavage stage of embryo- hemimetabolic and develops through three
genesis, the embryo will develop into a male, or stages, egg, larva (three nymphal instars) and
otherwise into a female. Spermatogenesis is char- adult.
acterized by inverse meiosis and the absence of
chromosome pairing and genetic recombination
where the genome of the mother determines the 6.1.1 Oviposition
heterochromatization of the inherited paternal
chromosomes in mealybug embryos. According Mealybugs may be oviparous, viviparous or ovo-
to this model, heterochromatization is controlled viparous. Although variable, the pre-oviposition
by a maternal factor, with the maternally derived period is 45 days in general. In most of the
chromosomes imprinted so that they do not suffer mealybugs like Pseudococcus longispinus,
the fate of the male chromosome. Sex determina- Ferrisia gilli Gullan, Dysmicoccus brevipes
tion in mealybugs, and consequently the sex ratio, (Cockerell) and Heliococcus bohemicus Sulc.,
is known to be inuenced by temperature and the eggs are laid by the adult female among the la-
age of the mother. The effect of the temperature or mentous secretion of the ovisac formed by the
the age of the mother on the sex ratio of the off- pores on the adult's body. Wax secreted by the
spring is attributed to a change in the ratio between numerous pores and ducts around the ovi-
the numbers of oocytes with and without the positional opening plays an important role in
maternal factor. forming a waxy sac around the laid eggs. The
6 Biology 89

ovisacs are somewhat variable in their structure, depending on the species, environmental condi-
depending upon the species of the mealybug. tions and food supply. It has been reported rang-
Several types of ovisacs have been recorded, ing from about 50 to over 800. In the absence of
varying from one covering the entire female adult males, the virgin females of Planococcus
body, to one covering only half or perhaps the minor (Maskell) do not produce eggs.
last two abdominal segments, to one which is
entirely ventral. These ovisacs are normally
deposited on the shoots, fruits, owers, leaves, 6.1.2 Incubation
underneath the bark and the cracks and crevices
of the plant stem and arms. The eggs hatch between 4 and 10 days, depend-
The eggs are oval and can be seen with the ing on the temperature and humidity. Hatching
naked eye, while the colour of the eggs varies percentage ranges from 80 to 90 %.
with the species. The normal oviposition period
of female mealybugs is 68 days, but it differs
depending upon the species and climatic condi- 6.1.3 Nymph
tions. They are in close proximity in the ovisac.
Female mealybugs are capable of mating multi- Mealybugs generally have three larval instars for
ple times on the same day and the female repro- females and four for males. Each of these stages
ductive output is unaffected by multiple resembles the previous one, except for an increase
copulations. As many as 600 eggs can be laid by in size and the amount of wax secreted. Usually,
one female, but the number of eggs varies accord- immature males are slightly longer and more
ing to the mealybug and the host species. Freshly slender than females.
laid eggs vary in colour in different species, for
example, the eggs are orange in case of
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green), violet in case 6.1.4 First-Instar Nymph (Both
of Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead), yellow in Sexes)
case of most of the mealybugs like Planococcus
citri (Risso). However, the colour changes The eggs hatch into rst-instar nymphs or crawl-
slightly before hatching, and the size also varies ers and are vulnerable to insecticidal applica-
in different species. In the case of M. hirsutus, the tions. This stage usually has proportionally very
eggs are 0.340.38 mm in length and the width large legs and antennae compared with other
ranges from 0.17 to 0.20 mm. Most of the mealy- instars and often there are fewer antennal seg-
bugs are oviparous and they lay eggs in the ovi- ments than in the adult. This crawler is often
sac. But some mealybugs are ovoviviparous quite mobile and usually migrates to other hosts,
(depositing live rst instars); for example, or at least to diverse areas of the parent host.
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) bears live There is no reliable character to distinguish
young, producing as many as 908 crawlers. These between the male and female at this stage. The
ovoviviparous females produce little or no ovisac mean duration of the rst instar is about 67
and apparently shield their young for a short time days; there is not much variation between male
by covering them with their abdomen. This char- and female instars, but it can vary under different
acter is particularly true of Puto, a genus which, conditions of temperature and humidity. When
for the most part, is ovoviviparous. Planococcus viewed from above, it seems elongate oval in
lilacinus (Cockerell) also lays the crawlers shape, but is extremely at from the side. The
directly, while Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) lays rst-instar nymph is often free from the waxy
eggs which hatch immediately after laying. The coating which usually develops at the later stages
number of offspring produced per female varies of growth.
90 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

6.1.5 Second-Instar Nymph (Both instar male is about 1 day, but it again varies
Sexes) according to temperature and humidity condi-
tions for different species.
The second-instar nymph emerges through a slit
in the medio-dorsum of the head and thorax of
the rst-instar skin. The legs and antennae are 6.1.7 Fourth-Instar Male
still proportionally larger compared to the adult
body and often there are fewer antennal segments The fourth instar of the male is produced in a
than in the adult. During this stage, it is possible cocoon and is known as the pupa. The third skin
to differentiate between the sexes, for by the end that is shed is again shoved to the back of the
of this instar, the males produce a lamentous sac cocoon. This instar differs from the previously
or cocoon over their bodies. The rostrum of the mentioned one; it has two longer, backwardly
male is lost after the rst moult, making the rec- directed wing pads, more antennal segments (ten-
ognition of the second-instar male quite simple. jointed, normally the same as the adult) with a
The second nymphal stage of the female is char- few pointed setae and three pairs of eyes. At one
acterized by the presence of six jointed antennae, point between this instar and the next, a break in
four pairs of cerarii in the abdominal segments the posterior part of the cocoon is formed and the
VIIX and the oral rim ducts are restricted to the fourth shed skin is pushed outside. The duration
dorsum. In the second stage, the male only has of the fourth instar/pupa is about 6 days, but it
one pair of, rarely two pairs of, cerarii and tubular again varies under different conditions of tem-
ducts of oral collar type both on the dorsum and perature and humidity.
the venter. Mean duration of the second instar is
about 67 days, but not much variation is seen
between male and female instars, though it can 6.1.8 Adult Female
be variable under different conditions of temper-
ature and humidity. The adult female is almost similar to the third-
instar female nymph. The third-instar female has
seven-jointed antennae and ve pairs of cerarii in
6.1.6 Third-Instar Nymph (Both the abdominal segments VIX, but the adult
Sexes) female has nine-jointed antennae, six pairs of
cerarii in the abdominal segments IVIX., valvu-
The second-instar skin is shed in the same man- lar opening and multilocular disc pores in the
ner as the rst, producing the third-instar nymph. venter. The fourth-instar female emerges in the
In female specimens, these instars begin to take usual manner to become an adult. The female
the normal shape of the adult. Legs and antennae nymph can be distinguished from all of the
are approximately in proportion to the body size, nymphal instars by the presence of a vulva and it
when compared with the adult and the antennal is often very large and distorted from the eggs or
segments are normally, but not always, the same nymphs which she carries in her abdomen. The
in number as in the mature forms. The duration of female nymph has various types of pores on its
the third instar in females is usually about 8 days, body; the circular multilocular and pentagonal
but it can vary under different conditions of tem- quinquelocular pores are believed to function in
perature and humidity. In the male, the second the production of the lamentous ovisac, whereas
skin is shoved to the posterior portion of the the normally more abundant trilocular pores
cocoon; the third-instar male is called the pre- function in the production of the white powdery
pupa and is usually much smaller and more elon- secretion, characteristic of mealybugs. The exact
gated than the third instar female. It also differs function of any of these pores has yet to be con-
because it has wing pads, no rostellum and more rmed and the precise morphological structure of
antennal segments. The duration of the third- the various types of tubular ducts is still unknown.
6 Biology 91

In certain mealybug species, such as Ferrisia vir- these of Pula are very dark brown or almost black
gata, it is believed that the enlarged tubular ducts in colour. Leg size is also quite variable:
produce thin crystalline rods, but the importance Antoninoides have very small, reduced legs;
of the smaller tubular duct remains a mystery. Discococcus have slightly larger legs;
The setae of the cerarii are apparently impor- Phenacoccus, Spilococcus, Chorizococcus and
tant in supporting the laments; again, in most others bear proportionately normal sized legs;
adult female mealybugs, two pairs of dorsal cavi- and the numerous Puto species bear very enlarged
ties or ostioles, as they are called, can be located and robust legs. The adult females of Antonina
submarginally. The posterior pair is on the seventh are totally without legs (apodous); on each sur-
abdominal segment and the anterior pair is appar- face of the posterior part of the trochanter, there
ently on the head. As previously mentioned, the are normally two, sometimes three, small clear
ostioles, when irritated, seem to function in the spots which are sensory in function. On the tarsal
secretion of globules of body uid, perhaps as a segments and on the claw, mealybugs normally
defensive mechanism. It is also believed that these have a pair of spatulate setae, but these are some-
dorsal openings function in the exit of honeydew times absent. The use of these setae is not known,
for consumption by ants. The laments which may but it seems logical to assume that they, in some
be seen so often on the lateral margins of many way, function in clinging to the substrate. The
mealybugs are apparently produced by the clusters vulva, which is always present in the adult
of trilocular pores surrounding the cerarii. female, is the genital opening and functions in
Other structures of the adult female are the copulation and egg laying. In some instances,
antennae, the eyes, mouthparts, legs, spiracles, more than one male is able to mate with a single
vulva, circulus, anal ring, anal lobes, body setae female at one time.
and cerarii. The antennae of mealybugs are li- The anal rings are often of various shapes in
form, with the terminal segments characteristi- different mealybugs, but they all function in waste
cally longer and wider than the preceding ones. elimination. As previously mentioned, these
There is a slight noticeable tapering of the anten- wastes, which are in many instances detrimental
nae from the rst segment to the last and the to the mealybug, are propelled long distances
antennal segmentation varies in number from two from the body by the rapid contraction of the
in some species of Antonina to nine in certain walls of the anal cavity. It is also possible that the
species of Phenacoccus. Antennal shape is anal ring serves as an exit for honeydew intended
important in the eld identication of some sub- for ant consumption and that the long setae of the
terranean mealybugs. The unusually short genic- ring serve as standards to hold the honeydew
ulate antennae of Rhizoecus, Pygmaeococcus and secretion before it is consumed by the ant.
Geococcus are easily recognized, particularly The adult female measures 2.652.80 mm in
when compared with the normal, straight anten- length and 1.751.85 mm in width, and the
nae of most other genera, which makes their eld females are wingless and as they mature, become
identication quite simple. There are often some more sessile. The female mealybug has a soft,
enlarged setae on the apical, two antennal seg- oval and attened segmented body, but the divi-
ments, which apparently act as special sensory sion between the thorax and the abdomen is not
setae. These setae differ from the other antennal distinct.
setae, being larger in diameter and more rounded
at the tip. The eyes of mealybugs are compound
and they function only in distinguishing between 6.1.9 Adult Male
light and dark.
The legs of mealybugs have a characteristic The fth-instar male refers to the adult which is
colour. For example, the legs of Rhizoecus and very complex morphologically and only the easily
Misericoccus are white, those of many species of recognized characteristics are discussed here.
Phenacoccus and Spilococcus are red, while There are two or three known primary types of
92 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

dermal pores occurring on male pseudococcids. antennae, such as Palmicola palmarum (Ehrhorn).
The rst type is normally clustered in a circular The male has six eyes a ventral pair, a lateral
group on the posterior lateral margin of each side pair and a dorsal pair. The eyes of most males are
of the ninth abdominal segment. In Phenacoccus dark red, with the smaller lateral pair protruding
gossypii Townsend and Cockerell, there is, in more than the other two. The mouthparts of the
addition to the pair of pore clusters on the ninth male are almost nonexistent and are completely
abdominal segment, another pair on the eighth non-functional. All that remains of the mouth is a
segment. These pore groupings apparently form small circular opening found at the posterior mar-
the wax of the long caudal laments. The pores gin of the ventral part of the head. Normally,
which make up these clusters are circular with a there is one pair of wings which develope from
ve-pointed star-shaped lumen, are called stellate the mesothorax; these wings possess two longitu-
pores. Most of the stellate pore clusters also have dinal veins, the anterior one being the radius and
long slender setae, which apparently act as central the posterior one being the media. There is also a
bases for the wax of the caudal laments. It is felt complex of minute basal veins called the costal
that the long anal lobe setae of the females might complex of wing veins. There are three forms of
also function in this manner. The male caudal males, the rst form has fully developed wings
laments of Puto arcloslaphyli Ferris and Puto (macropterous); the second form has wings, but
decorosus McKenzie, herein described as new, they are reduced and nonfunctional (brachypter-
show a seta in the middle of the long waxy la- ous); and the third form is wingless (apterous).
ments. In Phenacoccus gossypii Townsend and Examples of the rst form are Phenacoccus gos-
Cockerell and Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni sypii Townsend and Cockerell, Planococcus cilri
Tozzetti), the above characteristic was observed in (Risso), Puto lalicribellum Mc- Kenzie
the females. Other types of pores have also been Saccharicoccus sacchari (Cockerell); of the sec-
found on the males and are scattered over the body ond form is Palmicola palmarum (Ehrhorn); and
surface. These are called dermal disc pores and of the third form are Puto ambiguus (Fullaway),
name the number of loculi they contain. These P. echinalus McKenzie and P. pacicus
may vary from three to ve in number with four McKenzie. A pair of halteres is present on the
being normal, and it is further pointed out that metathorax; they are slender projections adorned
these structures are by no means at, but rather are with one or more setae at their tips. The normal
recessed into the derm, with several small protru- number of apical setae is one, but four have been
sions from the central part of the loculi. on each haltere in Puto yuccae (Coquillett). The
Body setae are also characteristic in the male. apical setae, whether four or more in number, are
Just as the normal lanceolate setae of the female re-curved in such a manner so as to hook into a
are present, so also are the thick, nger-like circular pocket in the posterior part of the
digitiform setae described by Beardsley. The lat- forewing.
ter are normally the most common of the two There are two pairs of spiracles in the male,
types; they predominate on both the surfaces of just as in the female, but in the case of the male
the body, the legs and especially the antennae. there is often a much more strongly developed
The digitiform setae, which are presumably peritreme. The legs of most males are quite simi-
sensory in function, are very similar to those on lar to those of the females, although they are usu-
the last two segments of the female mealybugs ally proportionately much longer and more
antenna. slender. The tarsus of the male has two segments
One pair of dorsal ostioles is present on the rather than the normal single segment of the
submarginal portion of the seventh abdominal female, although in most cases the additional
segment and corresponds to the posterior pair of segment is quite small and appears as a slightly
ostioles on the female. The antennae of the adult sclerotized ring. The digitules of the tarsal claws
male normally have ten segments, but occasion- of most males differ from the spatulate type of
ally there are species which have nine-segmented the female in being slender and setiform. The
6 Biology 93

claw is normally without a denticle. The external the young ones are produced over a period of up
genitalia in male is relatively simple, consisting to 2 months. On average, there are 170 offspring
of a large penile sheath, a conspicuous vertical per female during the spring and about 150 in the
slit and the penis or aedeagus. The penile sheath summer. The rst-instar nymphs are motile, but
is normally large and sclerotized with a posterior the succeeding instars are sessile and produce the
apical projection; this projection maybe of vari- felted wax covering from which a characteristic
ous shapes, but is usually broadly oval. On the excretory tube protrudes. A generation may take
ventral surface of the sheath, there is a noticeable 46 weeks, depending upon temperature and
slit from which the aedeagus often protrudes, is location.
normally tube-shaped and curves downward. The
penile sheath is apically of various shapes, from
broad as in Pseudococcus fragilis Brain, to very 6.2.2 Brevennia rehi
sharp and pointed as in P. longispinus (Targioni-
Tozzetti). The male of Puto yuccae (Coquillett), Reproduction of B. rehi Lindinger is mainly by
as well as many others of the Puto group, is quite thelyotokous parthenogenesis, viviparous parthe-
different from the normal Pseudococcid male. nogenesis and, to some extent, by oviparous sex-
The primary differences noted were eight pairs of ual reproduction. The oviposition period has
eyes, four setae on each halter, a toothed and been reported to be 24 days and the total num-
bifurcate aedeagus and a denticle on the claw. ber of eggs laid by a female varies from 42 to
The adult male has a brown-coloured body, 144, although up to 350 eggs has also been
bears two white, anal laments and is about recorded. The eggs are hyaline to yellowish-
1.5 mm in length. The development of the egg to white or pinkish-white and are elongate oval in
an adult male or female mealybug takes about shape. They are laid in groups in between the leaf
2426 days, but this can vary for different species sheath under the mealy covering; the incubation
under different climatic factors in different host period ranges from a few minutes to 39 h, with
plants. The population of the male mealybug is the hatchability of the eggs varying from 41.7 to
generally very low, compared to the females; the 93.5 %. The newly hatched nymphs are crowded
male to female ratio varies from 1:5 to 1:8, but within the waxy threads for 610 h before they
again, this is highly variable for different disperse to various parts of the same plant. The
species. pale yellowish nymph is active and the body gets
The biology of the mealybug varies with dif- covered with the waxy material on the second
ferent temperature conditions. The number of day. The nymphal period varies from 3 to 4
generations is quite variable in the weeks, where the mature females lay eggs for
Pseudococcidae; there are eight life cycles in about the same duration. The male nymphs grad-
approximately 1 year. In most of the Puto spe- ually develop wings after the rst few moults and
cies, however, only one generation occurs annu- emerge as small, active, ying insects; they are
ally and in Puto sandini Washburn, a high-altitude rarely seen and generally mate with females
species, there is one generation every 4 years. before dying a day or two after their emergence.
Adult females are wingless, robust, pink and
oval.
6.2 Biology of Important
Mealybug Species
6.2.3 Cataenococcus ensete
6.2.1 Antonina graminis
Ensete root mealybug C. ensete Williams and
The mealybug A. graminis (Maskell) reproduces Matile-Ferrero is a serious pest in southern
unisexually and up to ve generations are pro- Ethiopia. The females are viviparous and pro-
duced each year. Eggs hatch within the body and duce 253 nymphs/females. The average duration
94 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

of the rst-, second- and third-instar nymphs was non-sexual reproduction occurs. In summer,
16.2, 18.1 and 19.7 days, respectively. The aver- both the species produce living young over a
age lifespan of the adult female is 49.9 days. The 34-week period, with the Dysmicoccus neobre-
body length and width of the adult female mealy- vipes produces 346 offspring per individual and
bugs ranged between 2.94 mm and 2.53.5 mm, D. brevipes produces 246. The rst, second and
respectively, when measured inclusive of the wax third instars or larval stages last for 1026 days,
covering. Adult female mealybugs could not sur- 622 days and 724 days, respectively. Thus, the
vive more than 3 weeks in the soil in the absence total nymphal period varies from 26 to 55 days,
of plant materials. with the average being about 34 days. The pink
form starts reproducing parthenogenetically
about 25 days after the third moult, whereas the
6.2.4 Coccidohystrix insolita gray form produces males in about a 1:1 ratio
and mating is necessary for reproduction.
The adult female has very little dorsal wax and Unmated females may live for nearly 4 months
secretes a white, waxy ovisac up to 6 times as long awaiting fertilization. There are multiple over-
as its own body, which is more typical of some lapping generations, with the life cycle of some
Coccidae. The immature stages do not secrete a being at least twice as long as that of others,
thick layer of mealy wax, the body being shiny reared under similar conditions. Adult females
yellow-green with submedian grey spots on two are plump and have a convex body, and are pink-
abdominal segments and one thoracic segment. ish in colour. Lateral wax laments are usually
The female and male nymphs of C. insolita, less than one fourth as long as the breadth of the
reared in mass on sprouted potato tubers, at 22 body and those towards the back of the insect are
and 33 Cand 6096 % RH, completed ecdysis at half as long as the body. The fecundity of the
the age of 13.92 and 14.60 days, respectively. female was 658.58 nymphs/ovisac and the pre-
The ratio of female:male was 3.24:1. Starvation larviposition period for adult females lasts for
of impregnated females had no adverse effect on about 27 days. The larviposition (giving birth to
their oviposition. The increase in age of impreg- larvae) period lasts for an average of 25 days,
nation from 5 to 40 days in females had little they give birth to about 234 progeny, but may
effect on the preoviposition and oviposition peri- produce up to 1000 crawlers. It may then live for
ods and the incubation period of eggs. Fecundity another 5 days before dying. The duration of the
is about 261 days and the longevity varies from adult female life varies from 31 to 80 days, aver-
17.66 to 51.6 days. Thirty- to forty-day-old aging about 56 days. Male pineapple mealybugs
females showed 7788 % and 9699 % reduction do not exist in Hawaii; they are observed from
in oviposition period and fecundity, respectively. Brazil. Male pineapple mealybug males are dis-
tinguished from the gray pineapple mealybug
males by the difference in the number of anten-
6.2.5 Dysmicoccus spp. nal segments. The pineapple mealybug has eight
antennal segments and the gray pineappple
There are two separate species of Dysmicoccus mealybug has ten. In addition, the pineapple
found on pineapple plants. The pink mealybug mealybug has short clavate setae on its body and
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) which repro- appendages instead of the digitiform setae that is
duced non-sexually and the gray mealybug found on gray pineapple mealybugs. The dura-
Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Beardsley which was tion of the adult female life varies from 31 to 80
bisexual. D. brevipes reproduces non-sexually days, averaging about 56 days, where, the pre-
through a process called parthenogenesis in larviposition, larviposition and post-larviposi-
which females birth female larvae without fertil- tion periods last for an average of 27, 25 and 5
ization by males in Hawaii. In areas such as days, respectively. They give birth to about 234
Brazil, where males are present, both sexual and progeny, but may produce up to 1000 crawlers.
6 Biology 95

Another species Dysmicoccus boninensis yellow) remain motionless for 1015 min before
(Kuawana) is oviparous. The eggs are laid in a moving to the tender parts of the plant to x them-
cottony ovisac and hatch in about 10 days. The selves for feeding. The average duration of the rst
nymphal period ranges from 18 to 26 days and instar is 6.7 days and it takes about 4.4 days from
the males are necessary for reproduction. rst moult to cocoon formation in MarchApril. In
Dysmicoccus carens Williams was viviparous the cocoon, males moult three times and their
with four nymphal instars preceding the adult development inside the cocoon takes about 9 days.
stage. The life cycle of the mealybug ranges from The total nymphal period is about 20 days in
48.2 to 63.8 days when reared on CoC 671 or Co males. Thus, an adult male emerges from the
740. The mean fecundity is the lowest (117.6 cocoon after the fourth moult and is ready for cop-
crawlers/adult female) when reared on Co 6907 ulation a little after emergence. The male adults
and the highest (230.6 crawlers/adult female) on live for 13 days. Females undergo three nymphal
C 740. The longevity of males is 34 days. The instars and pass through incomplete metamorpho-
longevity of females is the greatest (32.3 days) on sis. The duration of the rst, second and third
Co 740 and the shortest (18.0 days) on CoC 671. instar was 7, 6 and 6 days, respectively. Total dura-
The mean duration of the rst instar varies from tion of the nymphal stage in females averages
4.8 days on CoC 671 to 6.1 days on Co 6806. The between 43.2 and 92.6 days at 28.9 and
duration of the second instar is the shortest 16.6 deg C, respectively, while in males it aver-
(4.1 days) on CoC 671 and the longest (5.8 days) ages to 25.4 days at 26.5 C. The total lifespan,
on Co 7704. The duration of the third instar was from the egg stage to the end of the adult stage,
the shortest (5.1 days) on CoC 671 and the lon- averages about 76.2154.6 days in females as
gest (6.1 days) on Co 6806. The duration of the opposed to 1947 days in males. The male:female
fourth instar ranged from 13.5 days on Co 6907 sex ratio is 1:1.87. Adult females are apterous with
to 15 days on Co 7704. two long prominent waxy laments at the poste-
rior end and with a lot of waxy or glossy hair over
the body which is covered with white waxy pow-
6.2.6 Ferrisia virgata der. They have fairly long, dark stripes on the dor-
sum of the posterior end of the body.
Reproduction in F. virgata (CklI.) is by both sex-
ual and parthenogenetic means, but the latter is
more common in this species. The courtship lasts 6.2.7 Ferrisicoccus psidii
for 130 min and the copulation time ranges from
15 to 20 min. The males prefer young adult In F. psidii Mukhopadhyay and Ghose, the duration
females and mating occurs only once during the of the rst nymphal stage ranges from 4 to 11 days.
lifespan of the female. The longevity of the female The second- and third-instar female nymphs com-
is about 50 days and the fecundity ranges from 300 plete their moulting at the age of 15.5 and
to 700 eggs per female. The eggs are deposited in 21.35 days, being 66.8 and 60.0 % at the age of
groups, rarely singly and are usually concealed 1317 and 1922 days, respectively. In he second,
under the body. They are oval and buff to light yel- third and fourth instars, males moult at the age of
low in colour. Since the eggs are laid in an 13.28, 14.71 and 18.69 days and are around 69.4,
advanced stage of embryonic development, they 62.4 and 68.5 % developed at the age of 1114,
hatch soon after the oviposition in a very short 1316 and 1720 days, respectively. The colour of
time and are therefore seldom seen. Under normal the crawlers and all the nymphal instars of females
conditions, the egg hatching percentage is about are rosy, creamy pink, pinkish chocolate and choc-
95 %. The egg period lasts about 28.14 min. Pre- olate; waxy dusts are found on their dorsum, the
oviposition, oviposition and post-oviposition peri- quantity progressively increasing with the progress
ods are 6.4, 8.1 and 1.5 days, respectively. Upon of their development and the stage. Nymphal
hatching, the crawlers (0.34 mm long and light instars of females secrete 78 pairs and 13 pairs of
96 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

marginally waxy tassels, mostly abdominal. All the ized by well-developed wing pads and lasts for
instars of females and the second instar of males about 57 days. The duration of development,
secrete a tubular and waxy anal process. from egg to adult in case of the female and the
male, is 30.3 and 28.7 days, respectively. The
pre-ovipositional period ranges from 6 to 7 days
6.2.8 Kiritshenkella sacchari and the ovipositional period ranges from 7 to 9
days, while the fecundity ranges from 426 to 573
The eggs of K. Sacchari (Green) are laid in a eggs. Adult males are orange coloured, minute
chain containing nearly 120 smooth eggs beneath and very active. The longevity of adult females
the abdomen of the female. The incubation period range between 13 and 16 days and for males
is 14 h when the average temperature is 27.8 C between 3 and 5 days.
and humidity is 63 %. Freshly emerged nymphs
remain beneath the abdomen of the mother for a
short while, after which they turn restive and 6.2.10 Nipaecoccus viridis
move about to settle in the vicinity of the mother.
The total life cycle is completed in 18.6 days dur- Adult females of N. viridis (Newstead) are rather
ing April. large and have black or purplish bodies. They
appear to be at, having short laments around
the margin, whereas the males are winged with
6.2.9 Maconellicoccus hirsutus long antennae. The eggs are laid in clusters and
enclosed in a protective, cottony mass. A female
Parthenogenesis was the main mode of reproduc- lays about 300500 eggs in its life time; the eggs
tion in M. hirsutus (Green), but sexual reproduc- are purple in colour and hatch in 1020 days and
tion was also observed. Freshly laid eggs are soon envelope themselves in the uffy material.
translucent and yellowish or light orange in The nymphs are amber coloured with whitish,
colour. They are elongated and oval in shape. As waxy coating around the margins. Female nymphs
the incubation period advances, the translucent moult thrice and complete their life cycle in 68
eggs become pinkish in colour before hatching. weeks, while the males moult four times and after
The incubation period varies from 5 to 7 days; passing through a pre-pupal stage, emerge as
and the hatching percentage of the eggs is about winged adults. The average developmental peri-
90 %. The rst-instar nymphs are usually yellow ods of males and females are 18.19 and 16.19 days,
to orange in colour with reddish compound eyes. respectively. The average pre-oviposition, ovipo-
The neonate larvae are oval in shape and are sition and fecundity are 7.33 days, 8.33 days and
highly mobile; during this stage, males and 176.33 eggs, respectively.
females are indistinguishable. The duration of the
rst-instar nymph lasts for 79 days. The body is
pinkish in colour with white, thin and waxy 6.2.11 Paracoccus marginatus
secretions on the body. The duration of the
second-instar nymph lasts for 68 days; at the A single female of Pa. marginatus Williams and
end of second instar, the female nymphs moult as Granara de Willink is known to lay about 230
usual, like the previous instars, but the males 400 eggs in an ovisac. The ovisac, developed
secrete a cottony puparia around their body. The ventrally, is three to four times the length of the
duration of the last instar of the female nymph body and is entirely covered with white wax. Egg
lasts for 810 days. The third-instar male nymphs laying usually occurs over a period of 12 weeks.
are recognized by denuding the puparia, distin- The eggs are greenish-yellow and egg hatching
guished by the presence of two small wing buds. occurs in about 10 days. The males have four
This instar lasts for 12 days, with an average of instars; the rst-instar nymphs are called crawlers
1.4 days. The last instar male nymph is character- and the duration of the rst-, second-, third- and
6 Biology 97

fourth- instar in the male nymph at 25 C was 6.5, 9.08 days, 67.42 eggs per female and 4.57 days,
6.6, 2.4 and 41 days, respectively. The fourth respectively. The longevity of the adult females
instar is produced in a cocoon and is referred to range from 47 to 55 days and the species repro-
as the pupa. Adult males tend to be pink in colour, duces parthenogenetically.
especially during the pre-pupal and pupal stages,
but appear yellow in the rst and second instar.
The duration of the rst-, second- and third- 6.2.14 Phenacoccus herreni
instar of the female nymph in the mealybug was
6.5, 5.5 and 5.2 days, respectively at 25 C. The Phenacoccus herreni Cox and Williams is a sex-
species is known to reproduce both sexually and ually reproducing mealybug. The rst instar
parthenogenetically. Males have longer develop- nymphs (crawlers) complete their development
ment time (2730 days) than females (2426 in an average of 7.7 days, the second instar aver-
days). The mean longevity of adult males and ages to 5.1 days and the third averages to 5.6 days.
females was 2.3 and 21.2 days respectively. The Adult females live for an average of 24.8 days,
adult female body is greenish-yellow, dusted with the oviposition period averaging about
with mealywax and not thick enough to hide the 18.4 days. The males passed through two
body colour without discrete bare areas on the nymphal instars, a pre-pupal stage and a pupal
dorsum and with many short waxy laments stage before becoming adults; these average at
around the margin of the body. around 7.5, 6, 2.8 and 3.1 days, respectively. The
ratio of females:males was 3:1. Reproduction
was exclusively sexual; oviposition begins 3 days
6.2.12 Phenacoccus aceris after pairing and the females deposit an average
of 773.6 eggs each. Initially, the crawlers are
Female Ph. aceris Signoret starts laying 200500 found mainly on the growing point of the plant,
eggs in a cottony ovisac during a 2-week period. from which they disperse down the stalk, settling
The eggs are oval and lemon-yellow in colour. nally on the lower surface of the leaves.
The ovisacs contain up to several hundred eggs.
The rst instar nymph is lemon-yellow, but with
bright red eyes. The nymphs gradually disperse 6.2.15 Phenacoccus madeirensis
to nearby plant tissues. Soon after they begin
feeding, they develop a granular white waxy cov- The total duration of development of the female
ering with laments at the caudal end, which is Phenacoccus madeirensis Green is 30 days at
typical of mealybugs. The adult female has a sage 25 C, 46 days at 20 C and 66 days at 15 C. The
green body, which is visible through the white, developmental time of males was 39 days lon-
waxy coating. The tails on the caudal end of the ger than females. Adult longevity at 25 C for
mealybug are shorter and the colour of the body males and ovipositing females was 3 and 20 days,
ranges from greenish to pale purple. respectively. Females at 20 C produced the high-
est number of eggs (500 eggs/female).

6.2.13 Phenacoccus bengalensis


6.2.16 Phenacoccus manihoti
At 28.832 C and 8896 % RH, the nymphs of
P. bengalensis Pramanik and Ghose complete In the case of Ph. manihoti Matile-Ferrero, no
their ecdysis at the age of 20.01 days and all of males are observed and reproduction is by thely-
them become adult females. The females start tokous parthenogenetic means. The eggs are
oviposition at the age of 3142 days. The pre- enclosed in an ovisac of felted waxen threads and
oviposition and oviposition period, fecundity and about 700 eggs are laid by one female. The adult
incubation period of eggs are 14.20 days, females mean longevity is 34.3 days. The dura-
98 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

tion of the egg stage, rst instar (crawler), sec- produces a sac with a cottony covering protrud-
ondfourth instars and the adult stage averages ing from the anal end of the body. The incuba-
about 8.0, 4.5, 4.1, 4.2, 5.2 and 20.2 days, respec- tion period of the eggs is 6.6 days; the female
tively. The mean generation time is 28.48 days. nymphs moult three times, while the males
moult four times. The freshly emerged rst
instar nymphs are oblong in shape. The average
6.2.17 Phenacoccus peruvianus duration of the rst-, second- and third-instar
nymphs is 4.8, 5.6 and 6.4 days, respectively,
Adult females are elongate oval in shape, are with the total nymphal duration being 16.8 days
greyish with a green tinge and covered in a thin in females. The rst- and second-instar nymphs
layer of white mealy wax. They lack marginal are pale yellow in colour and oblong-shaped.
and caudal wax laments, which are well devel- During the third instar, a white waxy substance
oped in other mealybug species. No males are covers the dorsal body surface. The adult
observed in the case of Ph. peruvianus Granara female is oblong in shape, light to dark yellow
de Willink and they reproduce parthenogeneti- in appearance and is wingless. The pre-
cally. Eggs are laid in the highly conspicuous oviposition, oviposition and post-oviposition
white, waxy and elongate ovisacs that form dense periods are recorded as 4.3, 8.0 and 2.7 days,
groups on the undersides of the foliage and on the respectively. The female adult survives for
stems. The nymphal instars are pale orange in 15.5 days and the entire lifespan lasts about 31
colour. days. A pair of dark spots on the thorax and
three pairs on the abdomen forming two longi-
tudinal stripes are noticed. Male mealybugs
6.2.18 Phenacoccus saccharifolii have two nymphal instars. The mean duration
of the rst and second instar is 4.0 and 5.3 days,
The female Ph. saccharifolii Williams secretes respectively. At the end of the second nymphal
the ovisac probably from the accessory glands instar, the males construct the puparia. The
one or two days prior to oviposition. The gravid pupal duration ranges from 6 to 7 days. The
female lays about 700 eggs in a single ovisac in total development of the female is complete in
batches. By the time the last batch of eggs is laid, about 26 days, while that of male takes about
the body of the female is raised to a vertical posi- 18.33 days. The sex ratio is 1:1.29.
tion with the anterior end attached to the substra-
tum by the oral bristles. The female dies soon
after oviposition. The incubation period lasts for 6.2.20 Planococcoides njalensis
56 days. The total life cycle is completed in
2528 days. This mealybug, Pl. njalensis (Laing) is biolog-
ically variable. Some of the forms exhibit a
strong parthenogenetic habit, so that males are
6.2.19 Phenacoccus solenopsis not necessary, whereas the others require males
for reproduction. Fecundity is very low, aver-
Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) is observed aging only about 36 young ones per female
to be ovoviviparous; the adult female is capable over a 20-day adult lifespan. The eggs hatch
of reproducing only if she mates with a male. P. within a few moments of being laid. There is
solenopsis lays about 500 eggs in the ovisac; no ovisac, only a few thin laments being pro-
they are minute, oval in shape and light yellow vided by the female for temporary protection
in colour. The eggs are smooth, translucent of the young. The life cycle is completed in
oblong in shape with tapering ends. It retains its about 42 days and there are about eight genera-
eggs in the body until they are ready to hatch. It tions in a year.
6 Biology 99

6.2.21 Planococcus citri Coccidoxenoides perminutus Girault at ve tem-


peratures between 18 and 30 C. The intrinsic
The female Pl. citri (Risso) lays yellowish-white rates of increase (rm) for both species were simi-
eggs within the ovisac. There may be 300800 lar, reaching maxima at 25 C (rm = 0.169 for P.
eggs in one mass and the eggs are oval and glossy. cus; rm = 0.149 for C. perminutus). The net
They hatch within 610 days; the nymphs are replacement rate (Ro) of P. cus was higher than
yellow, oval-shaped with red eyes and covered that of C. perminutus at all ve temperatures
with white waxy particles. The female nymphs tested. The Ro of P. cus reached a maximum at
have four instars, while the males have three 21 C (308.87 days) and that of C. perminutus at
instars and a pre-pupal stage. Only the males can 25 C (69.94 days). The lower and upper thresh-
produce a cottony cocoon and pupate. The male old temperatures for development of P. cus are
nymphs are elongated and narrower in appear- estimated at 16.59 and 35.61 C, respectively.
ance than females and often occur in a loose The lower threshold for the development of C.
cocoon. A female nymph is full grown in 68 perminutus was 8.85 C, but the upper threshold
weeks with three moults. The male is winged, could not be determined as there was no turning
greyish in colour and midge-like with long anten- point on the graph. Both the insects were well
nae. The male nymphs spin cotton-like cocoons, adapted to the temperatures. An average of 360
23 weeks after hatching and pupate before eggs per female was recorded.
transforming themselves into winged adults with
four moults, completing many overlapping gen-
erations in a year. The total life cycle of this 6.2.23 Planococcus kenyae
mealybug is completed in 3035 days. Citrus
mealybug populations are generally composed of An adult female of P. kenyae (LePelley) produces
equal numbers of males and females. The females more 150 progeny. The eggs are laid in a small,
are wingless, white to light brown in colour, with light ovisac and hatch in about 1.5 days, but this
brown legs and antennae. The body of adult period varies with climatic conditions from 1 h to
females is coated with white wax and bears a 45 days. The development from the egg to the
characteristic faint gray stripe along the dorsal adult stage requires about 36 days for the female
side. Short waxy laments can be seen around the and 33 days for the male.
margins of their oval body, with a slightly longer
pair of laments present at the rear end. The
females live for up to 29 days, depending on the 6.2.24 Planococcus krunhiae
host plant. The males are similar in colour to
females and have two long backward-projecting In the case of Planococcus krunhiae Kuwana, the
white wax threads. The adult males are winged duration of development from the egg to the adult
and thus capable of ying to new host plants for stage takes 35 days at 28.7 C and 80 % RH. The
the purpose of mating. Following their emer- duration of the egg and the nymphal stage is 4
gence, males live for 12 days, during which they and 20 days, respectively. Female lays about 150
are incapable of feeding. The males are short- eggs per female. Male mealybug takes 25 days to
lived, ranging from 2 to 4 days after the nal complete life cycle. Egg hatchability is about
nymphal moult. The females, however, live for 95 %.
3040 days.

6.2.25 Planococcus minor


6.2.22 Planococcus cus
The eggs of passionvine mealybug Pl. minor
Life table analyses were conducted for (Maskell) are yellow, minute and are protected in
Planococcus cus (Signoret) and its parasitoid an ovisac. At 29 C, the eggs hatch in 5.7 days.
100 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

The duration of the rst and second instar(female), called a pre-pupa, is contained in a cocoon that
the second instar (male), the third instar(female), begins forming toward the end of the second
the third instar (m) and the fourth instar(M) are instar. The fourth stage of the immature male is
6.6, 7.2, 6.4, 6.9, 2.6, 5.9 days, respectively. The the pupa; it is elongated and light reddish-brown.
females take 30.8 and males take 27.5 days, At 30 C, a generation may be produced in 2729
respectively, to complete the development cycle. days.
Fecundity is about 180 eggs and the male:female Adult females and males emerge at the same
ratio ranges from 1:1.54 to 1:2.75. time, from late June to mid-July for the rst
(overwintering) generation and late August to
mid-September for the second (summer) genera-
6.2.26 Pseudococcus comstocki tion. Adult females are present for a total of 46
weeks and oviposit for about 1 week after mat-
Pseudococcus comstocki (Kuwana) is known as a ing. The males survive for only a few days after
pest of pome and stone fruits and certain orna- emerging. The overwintered eggs hatch from
mental plants. There are two, three, or even four mid-April through May and the nymphs (crawl-
generations per year, depending to some extent ers) migrate from the oviposition sites to their
on climate. Generally, there is little overlapping feeding sites on terminal growth and to the under-
of broods until late in the season. Overwintering sides of the leaves of trees and shrubs. This hatch
is in the egg stage within the cottony ovisac. is completed by the petal-fall stage of pears. The
Overwintering eggs are laid as early as October, nymphs that hatch from these overwintered eggs
even in the milder climates, such as that of cen- are active from roughly early May to early July.
tral California. The overwintering eggs generally As the nymphs approach the adult stage, they
start hatching in late spring; they are elliptical tend to congregate on older branches at a pruning
and bright orange-yellow in colour. They are laid scar, a node, or at a branch base, as well as inside
in jumbled masses along with the waxy lamen- the calyx of pears. The second (summer) genera-
tous secretions in protected places such as under- tion nymphs are present from about mid-July to
bark crevices, near pruning cuts and occasionally mid-September.
in the calyx of fruits. The summer-generation
eggs are laid from mid-June through late July and
the overwintering ones from mid-August to 6.2.27 Pseudococcus cryptus
October. The summer-generation eggs have an
incubation period of about 11 days; the females Egg development time in Ps. cryptus (Ps.citricu-
produce an average of 200300 eggs, although lus) Hempel decreases with increasing tempera-
some individuals produce up to 700. The young ture and ranges from 2.4 days at 16 C to 1.0 days
females develop through three instars, after at 28 C. The total development time of nymphs
which they are capable of being fertilized and decreases from 54.9 days at 16 C to 17.4 days at
oviposition follows after 1015 days. The rst- 28 C and 19.3 days at 32 C. P. cryptus shows an
and second-larval instars of the female and the ovoviviparous reproductive behaviour and hence
male mealybug are virtually indistinguishable. the egg period is combined with the rst-instar
They appear similar to adult females, except that nymph. By tting linear models to the data, the
they are smaller, more oval-shaped, lack the long lower developmental threshold temperatures for
body laments and are more orange-yellowish the egg to the rst nymphs, second nymphs, third
because they have a lesser amount of wax cover- nymphs and from the egg to the third nymphs are
ing them. The rst-instar female crawler is at calculated as 8.7, 12.8, 13.1 and 12.1 C, respec-
and pale yellow but become darker over time. tively. The thermal constants are 198.6, 84.7,
The second and third instar females are similar in 69.8 and 296.3 degree-days, respectively, for
appearance, but become progressively browner each of the above stages. The non-linear model
and redder. The third instar of the immature male, based on a Gaussian equation, used to predict the
6 Biology 101

relationship between development rate and tem- similar to that of the other mealybugs. At the end
perature, is well described for all the stages. In of the second instar, the males produce cocoons
addition, the adult longevity decreases from (pupa) over their bodies. The third moulting takes
80.4 days at 16 C to 31.3 days at place within the cocoon; the fourth instar, also
32.0 C. Furthermore, the pre-oviposition and known as pupa, is characterized by well-devel-
oviposition periods show a pattern similar to that oped wing pads. Only males pupate and develop
of longevity. Overall, P. cryptus has a maximum into adult males. The male development, includ-
fecundity of 111 eggs per female at 28 C, which ing the nymphal and pupal stages, ranges from 18
declines to 102.7 eggs per female at 32 C. to 20 days with a mean of 19.10 days. The adult
female mealybugs are very sluggish and are simi-
lar to the nymphs. The male mealybugs are rare,
6.2.28 Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi tiny and active. They have a pair of wings and two
long waxy caudal laments at the posterior end of
The Jack Beardley mealybug Ps. jackbeardsleyi the abdomen, similar to the other mealybugs.
Gimpel and Miller is oviparous and lays yellow- They are y-like insects, do not feed and die soon
ish eggs. The eggs are laid in a mass within a after they mate. The females complete the life
loose, thin and waxy sac behind their abdomen. cycle in 2529 days, with a mean of 26.20 days
The ovisac is a little elongated and the number of and while the males complete their development
eggs laid by a single mealybug ranges from 650 to in 2326 days, with a mean of 24.40 days. There
900 with a mean of 775.60. They are in close is a variation in the developmental period from
proximity within the white ovisac. Freshly laid eggs to adults in the mealybugs, depending on the
eggs were yellowish, smooth and oval with weather and host plants.
slightly tapering ends, but they turn a darkish yel-
low before they hatch. The incubation period is
58 days, with a mean of 5.37 days at 25 1.8 C 6.2.29 Pseudococcus longispinus
and 7085 % RH. The nymphs remain in the egg
sac for a day or two after hatching, before crawl- The female Ps. longispinus (Targioni-Tozzetti)
ing about the plant in search of food. Newly produces around 200 live young (which she
hatched mealybugs (crawlers) are quite active. deposits under her body) over a 23-week period.
The crawlers, once they begin feeding, secrete a During summer, the life cycle is completed in
white, waxy material that covers their body and around 6 weeks and in about 12 weeks in winter.
produces approximately 34 leg-like laments Long-tailed mealybugs produce live young, but
around the perimeter of the body. The nymphs are do not produce an ovisac. The eggs are straw yel-
light yellow and six-legged with oval, attened low at rst, but deepen in colour before hatching.
and smooth bodies. The females change only The eggs (20240) may hatch as soon as they are
slightly in appearance, except for growing in size laid, giving the impression that the young are
to about one sixth or one fourth of an inch when born, rather than hatched. The crawlers are at,
fully grown. The females of this species have oval, light yellow in colour and six-legged insects
three larval stages (or instars); similar to the other with smooth bodies. Soon after beginning to
mealybugs, the male and female nymphs are feed, they exude a white, waxy covering over
indistinguishable in the rst instar, but by the end their bodies. The differentiation between the
of the second instar, it is possible to differentiate male and the female begins only after moulting.
between the sexes. Female mealybug nymphs are The male nymphs stop feeding near the end of the
similar to that of adult female mealybugs, except second stage and migrate towards a protected
the latter are larger in size. The females become place where they secrete waxy cocoons in which
adults after the last moult; the female nymphal they complete their development. The females go
period ranges from 18 to 21 days with a mean of through three stages to adulthood, but change
20.82 days. The males have four nymphal instars, little in appearance.
102 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

6.2.30 Pseudococcus mandio has ve. The pre-oviposition period is 12 days and
the eggs laid by the gravid females are observed on
At 25 C, 80 % RH and constant light, the female the underside of their abdomens. Fecundity ranges
Ps. mandio Williams has three nymphal instars, from 200 to 300 eggs per female; they are creamy
with average durations of 9.2, 5.7 and 6.5 days, yellow and covered with mealy powder. The rst-
respectively and their average lifespan is 17.8 days. instar nymph is cream-coloured and after the rst
The males have two instars, which last an average moult, the cream-yellow colour changes to light
of 8.9 and 5.2 days, with the average pre-pupal and pink. The nymphs feed together for some time and
pupal periods of 12.5 days, and an average adult a few days before the second moult, the nymphs
lifespan of 2.1 days. The pre-oviposition period developing as males spin a cocoon. Such male
lasts 4.7 days and each female lays an average of nymphs descend from the stalk of young plants and
302.2 eggs. The average incubation period is pupate in the leaf sheaths, while the female nymphs
3.8 days, with 99.4 % eclosion. The life cycle from remain feeding on the leaves. This stage lasts for
oviposition to adult emergence is 25.2 days for 67 days. The pre-pupa appears pink in colour and
females and 30.4 days for males. lasts for 2 days. In the case of males, the pupa is
distinguished from the pre-pupa by the presence of
wing pads. The pupa moults once again to attain the
6.2.31 Pseudococcus maritimus adult form; the adult male is a small, delicate and
alate insect with a reddish-pink body. The lifespan
Both sexes of Ps. maritimus (Ehrhorn) are capable of the male is only days. In the case of females, the
of mating multiple times on the same day and on light pink second-instar nymph is covered by mealy
sequential days. Median times between copula- secretion and this stage lasts for 6 days. Third instar
tions are short (<10 min) on the rst day that the nymph is light pink and covered with copious secre-
males are presented with the females, but tend to tions of wax. The yellowish-brown adult female is
increase with sequential copulation events. densely covered with wax, very sluggish and sel-
Unmated females live for up to 19 weeks, as mat- dom moves away from the spot of feeding. The
ing and oviposition result in reduced longevity. lifespan of the adult female, including the pre and
The eggs that are laid are yellow to orange in post-gestational period, is 2527 days.
colour and are within an egg sac. The crawlers are
yellow to orange-brown in colour. There is a stron-
ger winter dormancy in the egg and crawler stages, 6.2.33 Pseudococcus viburni
so that the seasonal development is attuned to a
deciduous host. Overwintering usually takes Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) (=Pseudococcus
places ordinarily in crawlers and unhatched eggs obscurus Essig; Ps. afnis (Maskell)) has four or
in the loose cottony ovisac. With the rst warm ve generations per year on citrus, depending on
weather of early spring, these nymphs move to the the climate. It overwinters in all stages, with mod-
swelling buds and feed on the tender shoots; on erate retardation from cold weather. Each female
reaching maturity, they begin to oviposition around deposits up to 500 eggs during the rst 12 weeks,
June or July. The mature females tend to move to which accumulate in a loose caudal egg sac. They
the trunks or protected crevices of the rough bark hatch in about 8 days under summer conditions
to oviposition. It is this brood which, by feeding on and maturity is attained in about 42 days, fol-
the leaves and the fruits, causes the damage. lowed by oviposition after several weeks.

6.2.32 Pseudococcus saccharicola 6.2.34 Rastrococus iceryoides

Parthenogenesis and sexual reproduction are the The female R. iceryoides Green lays eggs only
common modes of reproduction in this species. after fertilization. The pre-oviposition period
While the female undergoes four instars, the male lasts for 79 days and the oviposition lasts for
6 Biology 103

7 days. About 500 eggs are laid in the white may be found swarming from below the mother,
ovisac and the fecundity averages to about 800 which tend to give an impression that the mealy-
eggs. The incubation period is 6 days. Females bug is viviparous. The crawler extricates itself
moult three times, while males moult four from one end of the egg, the eggshell sticking on
times to become adults. The females take its posterior end. The rst-instar nymphs are tiny,
2030 days and males 1825 days to complete transparent and pink in colour and very active.
the life cycle. This stage lasts for 5.3 days. During the second-
instar nymphal period, the body grows in size and
the antennal length increases to 0.36 mm due to
6.2.35 Rastrococcus invadens the addition of a segment. The stage is completed
in 4.83 days. The duration of the third-instar
The mealybug, R. invadens Williams completes nymph is 17.2 days. Ovarian development is
eight generations in a year. The female and completed in 13.8 days while one generation is
male nymphs complete development in 34.67 completed in 54.7 days.
and 38.16 days, respectively, during winter at
1521 C and in 24.6332.67 days or 27.63
36.18 days at 1833 C during February to 6.2.37 Trionymus haancheni
November, the optimum being during June
July at 2731 C in females and during May The adult female Trionymus haancheni McKenzie
June at 2733 C in males. The male:female is quite small, but is visible to the eye without
ratio ranges from 2.13:1 to 3.3:1. The maxi- magnication, reaching a length of approxi-
mum pre-reproductive period and oviposition mately one fth of an inch (5 mm). The eggs are
period and minimum fecundity are 2029 days, laid in loose, cottony wax. These cottony egg
3445 days and 165 (145175) in nymphs, sacs are usually laid on the lower part of the
respectively, in winter. The minimum pre- plant, close to the roots and were also observed
reproductive period and the maximum fecun- under the leaf sheaths of the plant. A single
dity are 1418 days and 204 (180235) days in female can lay as many as 256 eggs in a single
nymphs, respectively, in September and the ovisac during a week. Reproduction occurs asex-
minimum oviposition period (2835 days) ually in the absence of males. The eggs are pink-
occurs in April. red and not visible to the naked eye. Eggs hatch
producing the crawlers (the most mobile nymphal
stage, which disperse to nd suitable sites for
6.2.36 Saccharicoccus sacchari feeding on plant sap). The crawlers can also be
transported to other plants by wind, people, or
In the largely parthenogenetic mode of reproduc- animals; they develop through several successive
tion, alate males are not uncommon, though nymphal instars that resemble small adults, each
apterous forms are also observed in the case of of which have legs and can actively move, until
Sa. sacchari (Cockerell). With a pre-oviposition the mature adult stage is reached and the cycle
period of 13.83 days, a single female is capable repeats. The number of generations in Idaho is
of depositing nearly 1,000 eggs. The eggs are still unknown but all the instars can be found at a
smooth, yellowish, cylindrical, with both ends single time on a plant host. The number of gen-
rounded. A single such batch may contain a max- erations is not known, but all the stages have been
imum of 262 eggs. The nymphs hatch within found co-existing on infested plants. Coupled
34.15 h and before hatching, the eggs become with a short generation time, the ability to repro-
soft and elongated. Sometimes, no eggs may be duce asexually can allow mealybug infestations
noticed and only orange coloured tiny crawlers to increase quickly to damaging levels.
104 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

6.3 Biology of Root Mealybugs 6.3.2 Paraputo sp.

6.3.1 Geococcus citrinus Kuwana They are bisexual and can be ovoviviparous or
viviparous. The favourable period for their repro-
This is a bisexual species. The females lay the duction is around AugustOctober, with 30 nymphs
eggs in masses or chains. These eggs are pearly per female mealybug. The nymphs develop into
white, translucent and elongate oval in shape. both male and female adults. The males are charac-
The average incubation period is 12.20 days. In terized by one pair of wings, are shorter in size than
Gococcus citrinus, a single female is known to the females and occur in very few numbers. The
lay about 113188 eggs, with an average of females are plump, convex in shape and covered
128.2 eggs. There are three nymphal instars for with white waxy mealy substances. They develop
the females; the nymphs are elongate oval, white by undergoing three nymphal instars, while the
in colour and cluster on the roots to feed. The males undergo four growth stages. The life cycle of
duration of the rst-, second- and third-instar the females takes 33.543.7 days, while that of the
nymphs lasts for an average of 7.3, 5.6 and males take 29.339.5 days.
5.8 days, respectively. The size of the nymphs
increases with the instars. In males, the pupal
stage lasts for 5 days. The adult females are 6.3.3 Cataenococcus ensete
elongate oval, white and wingless with a seg-
mented body. The females live for about Adults of enset root mealybug C. ensete (Williams
12.78 days. The adult males are light brown in and Matile-Ferrero) are viviparous and produce
colour and have only one pair of narrow, elon- 156383 nymphs, and their total lifespan is 94113
gated and opaque wings with a round outer mar- days. This species has three nymphal stages; the
gin. The males live for a maximum of 5 days. development of the nymph to the adult mealybug
Unlike other mealybugs, G.citrinus nymphs and takes 54 days on average and the lifespan of the
adults do not produce honeydew; hence usually adult root mealybug is 50 days. The average dura-
these are not associated with ants. The total life tion of the rst-, second- and third-instar nymphs
cycle of G. citrinus and Geococcus coffeae is 16.2, 18 and 20 days, respectively. The average
Green are 28.8 days and 33.8 days, respectively. lifespan of the adult female is 50 days.
In case of Rhizoecus hibisci Kawai and
Takagi, the eggs are laid in white, loose, waxy,
elongate ovisacs which are about 2 mm long and 6.3.4 Rhizoecus amorphophalli
can easily disintegrate when disturbed. Each ovi-
sac contains up to 80 eggs, which usually hatch Rhizoecus amorphophalli is the noxious pest
within 24 h. Nymphs (immature stages) are infesting the stored tubers of elephant foot yam,
creamy-white. They closely resemble the adults, taro and tannia. The ovoid, pale white eggs are laid
but are signicantly smaller. Adult females are in clusters inside the egg sac and turn light brown
creamy-white, elongate and covered in a pow- on hatching. The average length and breadth of the
dery wax that is deposited on the roots and the eggs are 187.80 m and 102.50 m, respectively.
soil; these deposits are often the rst sign of After eclosion, the rst-instar larvae (crawlers)
infestation. Adults and nymphs feed on the roots moved out of their ovisac, actively searching for
of the host plants, but may also be found within suitable feeding sites on the tubers. The crawlers
the root ball and on the inner surface of the plant are oval and semi-translucent with three pairs of
container. The males are extremely rare and are legs and paired eyes, measuring 183 m in length
unlikely to be seen. There can be several over- and 98 m in width. They prefer to hide out in the
lapping generations throughout the year and crevices or depressions of the tubers and on settle-
their numbers can multiply rapidly under favour- ment produce mealy substance to create waxy
able conditions. laments over their body. The rst instar lasts for
6 Biology 105

47 days. The second-instar larva is 270 m long Bartlett BB (1978) Pseudococcidae. In: Clausen CP (ed)
Introduced parasites and predators of arthropod pests
and 124.74 m wide and is semi-translucent with
and weeds: a world review. USDA-ARS, Washington,
a shiny body. The second-instar larva lasts for an DC, pp 137170
average of 4.82 days and before undergoing next Chong JH, van Iersel MW, Oetting RD (2004) Effects of
moulting, they settle either on the previous site or elevated carbon dioxide levels and temperature on the
life history of the Madeira mealybug (Hemiptera:
on another suitable site on the tuber and cover
Pseudococcidae). J Entomol Sci 39:387397
themselves with mealy laments. The third instar Coumara Radja N (1985) Studies on the biology and con-
is relatively larger, measuring 429.47 m in length, trol of rice mealybug, Brevennia rehi (Lindinger)
193.2 m in width, and the duration of this instar (Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera). MSc thesis, Tamil
Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore
is 46 days and the sex differentiation is obvious at
Daane KM, Rodrigo PP, Almeida, Bell VA, Walker JTS,
the end of this stage. The female nymphs moult Botton M, Fallahzadesh M, Mani M, Miano JL, Sforza
normally, but the male instar produces a cottony R, Walton VM, Zaveizo T (2012) Biology and man-
puparium around its body.. The pupal stage lasts agement of mealybugs in vineyards. In: Bostanian NJ
et al (eds) Arthropod management in vineyard pests,
for an average of 2.50 days and the males trans-
approaches, and future directions, Springer Science+
form into winged adult forms. They undergo a Media B.V., Dordrecht, pp 271307. doi
radical change during their life cycle the wing- 10.1007/978-007-4032-7-12
less nymphs transform into winged adults. The Jayanthi R (1986) Mealybugs. In: David H, Easwaramoorthy
S, Jayanthi R (eds) Sugarcane entomology in India.
adult female body is oval, whitish, wingless and
Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, pp 259275
sparsely covered with white mealy substance. The Kamariya NM, Patel VN (2011) Biology of mealy bug,
length and width of adult females are 867.19 m Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) on cotton. J Cotton
and 368.88.78 m, respectively. After mating, the Res Dev 25(1):115118
Kim SC, Song J-H, Kim D-S (2008) Effect of temperature
adult females secrete an ovisac of white waxy sub-
on the development and fecundity of the Cryptic
stance in about 714 h and egg laying begins 37 h Mealybug, Pseudococcus cryptus, in the laboratory.
after this process. The eggs are laid in a bead- J Asia-Pacic Entomol 11(3):149153
shaped pattern, but later they are found in a disar- McKenzie HL (1967) Biology (Life history, Annual
Successions) morphology and classication.
rayed and scattered manner under mealy covering.
Mealybugs of California. University of California
Oviposition is completed in about 38 h with a Press, pp 2427, 3640
maximum fecundity of 79 eggs and the females Milena Varela A, Belloti AC (1981) Some aspects of the
are not able to survive more than 4 h after egg lay- biology of and observations on a new mealybug of
cassava Phenacoccus herreni (Homoptera:
ing. At 32.2235.10 C and 5565 % humidity, all
Pseudococcidae) in Colombia. [Spanish]. Revista
the eggs hatch after about 69 days of incubation. Colombiana de Entomologia 7(1/2):2126
Mishra D, Mukhopadhyay AK, Pramanik A (2004)
Biology of the mealybug Phenacoccus bengalensis
Pramanik and Ghose, 1999 (Homoptera:
References Pseudococcidae). Uttar Pradesh J Zool
24(2):155159
Addis T, Azerefegne F, Blomme G, Kanaujia K (2008) Mukhopadhyay AK (2005) Study on the biology of the
Biology of the enset root mealybug, Cataenococcus mealybug, Ferrisicoccus psidii. Ann Plant Protect Sci
ensete and its geographical distribution in Southern 13(1):239240
Ethiopia. J Appl Biosci 8(1):251260 Nakahira K, Arakawa R (2006) Development and repro-
Alam S, Karim ANMR (1981) Rice mealybug, Brevennia duction of an exotic pest mealybug, Phenacoccus
rehi in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Zool 9(1):1726 solani (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) at three constant
Ali M (1995) Bionomics of sugarcane mealybug, temperatures. Appl Entomol Zool 41:573575
Kiritshenkella sacchari (Green) (Homoptera, Nikam ND, Patel BH, Korat DM (2010) Biology of inva-
Pseudococcidae). Pakistan J Zool 27(1):1519 sive mealy bug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley
Awadallah KT, Ammar ED, Tawk MFS, Rashad A (1979) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on cotton. Karnataka
Life-history of the white mealy-bug Ferrisia virgata J Agric Sci 23(4):649651
(Ckll.) (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae). Deutsche Pegoraro RA, Bellotti AC (1994) Biological aspects of
Entomologische Zeitschrift 26(1/3):101110 Pseudococcus mandio Williams (Homoptera:
Ayyar TVR (1939) The rice mealybug in South India. Pseudococcidae) in cassava [Portuguese]. Anais da
J Mysore Agric Exp Union 17:179188 Sociedade Entomologica do Brasil 23(2):203207
106 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Pramanik A, Ghose SK (1993) Experiments on the biol- Sahoo AK, Ghosh AB, Mandal SK, Maiti DK (1999)
ogy of the brinjal mealybug, Coccidohystrix insolita Study on the biology of the mealybug, Planococcus
(green) (Pseudococcidae: Homoptera). Ann Entomol minor (Maskell) Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera).
11(1):1518 J Interacademicia 3(1):4148
Rajendra A (1974) The biology and control of Vennila S, Deshmukh AJ, Pinjarkar D, Agarwal M,
Saccharicoccus sacchari Ckll. (Hom: Pseudococcidae) Ramamurthy VV, Joshi S, Kranthi KR, Bambawale
the pink mealy bug of sugar cane in Sri Lanka. Ceylon OM (2010) Biology of mealybug, Phenacoccus
J Biol Sci 11(1):2328 solenopsis on cotton in Central India. J Insect Sci
Razak TA, Ananthi DV, Jayanthi R (1994) Biology of the 10:119
sugarcane mealybug, Dysmicoccus carens Williams Walton VM, Pringle KL (2005) Developmental biology of
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). J Entomol Res vine mealybug, Planococcus cus (Signoret)
18(2):169174 (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), and its parasitoid
Saha A, Ghosh A (2001) Biological studies on the mealy- Coccidoxenoides perminutus (Timberlake)
bug, Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) on various host (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). African Entomol
plants. Uttar Pradesh J Zool 21(1):7578 13(1):143147
Culturing of Mealybugs
7
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Culturing of mealybugs is essential to rear the laboratory in different countries on potato tubers
natural enemies, particularly parasitoids and and cucurbit fruits for the purpose of mass breed-
predators for use in the eld. Biological control ing of their parasites and predators (Ahmad and
programmes of mealybug species have relied on Ghani 1970). Large-scale multiplication of the
sprouting potatoes, pumpkins and butternut for mealybug for mass production of natural enemies
rearing of both mealybugs and their natural ene- was done on potato sprouts and pumpkin (Ahmad
mies. The ability to mass-rear the mealybugs is a and Ghani 1970. The rearing of Ferrisia virgata
vital step towards the culturing and colonisation (Cockrell) on brinjal has been reported by Rawat
of its natural enemies. An inexpensive mass- and Modi in India.
rearing technique and a nutritionally efcient but
simple diet have to be developed for the mealy-
bugs. The nutritional regime should be capable of 7.1 Potato Sprouts
producing and supporting great numbers of
mealybugs at low cost. An important requirement The use of potato sprouts as an insectary host for
for mass-rearing substrate is a long shelf life, the mealybugs culture was discovered by H. S.
which obviates the regular provision of fresh Smith and E. J. Branigan of the State insectary of
food. In this regard, butternut, pumpkins and USA (Branigan 1916). It was later modied by
sprout in potatoes have been found as suitable Smith and Armitage (1920), who found that
substrates for the mass-rearing of mealybugs white sprouts which developed in subdued light
(Johnson and Giliomee 2011). and at temperatures of 21.122.2 C were highly
In the large-scale production of mealybugs, acceptable to the mealybugs (Fig. 7.1).
potato sprouts or ripe pumpkins have been used The production method of P. citri on potato
in several countries. For mass rearing, a pure cul- sprouts is described in detail, as given by Fisher
ture of Planococcus citrii (Risso) must be main- (1963). The variety Red Bliss Triumph is pre-
tained in an isolated room solely for infesting ferred to Bounty or White Rose because it pro-
work (Finney and Fisher 1964). Species of duces sturdy sprouts highly acceptable to the
mealybugs have been satisfactorily reared in the mealybug and its natural enemies.
Potatoes after harvest should be stored for
more than 3 months at 2.2 C. Fans have to be
M. Mani (*) C. Shivaraju
provided to facilitate the circulation of air, which
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India reduces the temperature uctuation throughout
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in the storeroom, and also reduces the decay

Springer India 2016 107


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_7
108 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Fig. 7.1 Culturing of mealybugs on potato sprouts (Fisher 1963)

fostered by humidity. Planting trays are made of mum (properly bleached) potato sprouts.
redwood and their outside dimensions are Continuous weak light causes sprouts to become
18 4. Soil used is sandy silt, obtained from excessively etiolated and too much light causes
riverbed. Trays and soil can be sterilised prior to excessive leaf growth. Excessive long sprouts are
re-use. Approximately 3 months after harvest or pruned to 12 lengths. The time from planting
when sprouts begin to appear, the tubers are until infesting with mealybugs is usually 21 days
ready for planting. Medium to large-size sound in summer and 30 days in winter and in early
whole potatoes are used, and 2526 tubers are spring (Fig. 7.2).
placed about apart and on a layer of soil in Crawlers are removed from producing trays
the tray. They are covered with slightly damp- by allowing them to crawl into freshly cut short
ened soil. Immediately after planting, trays are leafy terminals of Switches of Pittosporus
placed on the racks of a thoroughly cleaned room undulatum placed among the sprouts. Schinus
and watered. Trays should be lled with brimful molle (California pepper) is also used in autumn.
of water every 4 or 5 days and watering should be Approximately 6 h after placing them on the
discontinued after the sprouts have been infested. trays of mealybugs, the switches are removed
Temperatures of 21.123.3 C appear to be opti- from the food room and placed on the fresh
mum for facilitating sprout growth and relative sprouts in the production from where the mealy-
humidity of 6084 % have given good results, bug crawlers move on to the sprouts as the
provided there is proper airow through the cul- switches dry out. During the transfer periods,
ture room. Control of light intensity in order to trays are not watered; light intensity is increased
minimise leaf growth and chlorophyll develop- and temperature is adjusted to 26.6 C. Another
ment is a critical factor in the production of opti- method is to remove every third tray in the row
7 Culturing of Mealybugs 109

Fig. 7.2 Mass production of mealybugs on potato sprouts

and replace it with a tray containing long sprouts preferred host for the mass rearing of Oleander
that can be carefully bent over to interlace with mealybug Paracoccus burnerae (Brain) (Johnson
the over-producing sprouts of adjoining trays. and Giliomee 2011).
Stock from one mealybug tray will infest from 20 In India, the rearing of mealybugs on potato
to 25 trays. The optimum temperature for con- sprouts has been standardised by Joshi. The fol-
tinuous culture of mealybugs lies between 20 and lowing are the steps involved: (1) Procurement of
23.8 C (Fisher 1963). Sprouting potatoes are the medium-sized potatoes with well-developed
110 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

eyes. (2) Cleaning with tap water and keeping in Cucurbita maxima Gil. (Mineo 1967). The prop-
a basin lled with sterilised sand. (3) Covering agation of citrus mealybugs on ripe pumpkins, C.
potatoes with sand and water moderately. (4) moschata D., has been outlined by Chacko et al.
Within a week or two, the sprouts grow to a (1978) and Singh (1978). The pumpkins with
length of 34 in.. (5) Removing the potatoes from ridges and grooves and a small stalk are selected,
sand and washing them with tap water. (6) which makes the handling easy. To prevent rot-
Keeping them in sunlight for a day so that the ting, the pumpkins are treated with 0.1 % beno-
sprouts turn green. (7) Infesting one sprout with myl (1 g/L). The wounds, if any on the pumpkin,
ve gravid females of mealybug. (8) Keeping are plugged with melted parafn wax. Ovisacs on
infested potatoes at 27 C and 5060 % relative P. citri /M. hirsutus are distributed over the pump-
humidity (R.H.). kin fruits or crawlers are dusted on the fruits. In
due course, the crawlers settle on all sides of the
pumpkin. The infested pumpkins are kept on
7.2 Pumpkin small tripod stands, which can be arranged in the
racks. In about a month, the mealybug population
The rearing of P. citri on cucurbits in USSR was covers the whole pumpkin. A temperature of 25
rst reported by Sysoev (1953). In Sicily (Italy), C is to be maintained in the rearing room
the mealybug P. citri was reared on pumpkin, (Chacko et al. 1978; Singh 1978) (Fig. 7.3).

Fig. 7.3 Rearing of mealybugs on pumpkins


7 Culturing of Mealybugs 111

7.3 Host Plants 7.4 Diets

The mealybugs are cultured on host plants. Initial Attempts were also made to rear the mealybugs
culturing is always done on natural host plants. on articial diet. Rearing the cassava mealybug,
Sometimes mass culturing is also done on the Phenacoccus manihoti, was done on a dened
host plants. A mass production protocol is avail- diet (Calatayud et al. 1998).
able for the production of papaya mealybug
Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de
Willink on potato sprouts. However, it was very References
difcult to maintain potato plants in high-
temperature areas where spoilage of potatoes is a Ahmad R, Ghani MA (1970) A note on the rearing of
scale insects and mealybugs on potato tubers and
concern. Alternatively, a mass production tech-
cucurbit fruits. Tech Bull Commonw Inst Biol Control
nique has been developed using Hibiscus canna- 13:105107
binus for mass production of the papaya Branigan EJ (1916) A satisfactory method of rearing of
mealybug. Seeds were procured locally. Before mealybugs for use in parasite work. Calif State Hort
Comm Monthly Bull 5:304306
sowing, the seeds were spread on paper and
Calatayud PA, Delobel B, Guillaud J, Rahb Y (1998)
allowed to dry under sunlight for 13 h. Trays of Rearing the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti
45 cm 30 cm 13 cm (l w h) with four to six on a dened diet. Entomol Exp Appl 86(3):325329
holes in the bottom to drain out excess water Chacko MJ, Bhat PK, Rao LVA, Deepak Singh MB,
Ramanarayan BP, Sreedharan K (1978) The use of the
were lled with a mixture of sand, soil and farm-
lady bird beetle, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, for the
yard manure (1:1:1) up to 9 cm and H. cannabi- control of coffee mealybugs. J Coff Res 9:1419
nus seeds were sown for culturing the plants Finney CL, Fisher TW (1964) Culture of entomophagus
under laboratory conditions. The seeds started to insects and their hosts. In: DeBach PD (ed) Biological
control of insect pests and weeds. Chapman and Hall,
sprout within 2 days and attained a height of
London, pp 328353
40 cm within 2025 days, which is the suitable Fisher TW (1963) Mass culture of Cryptolaemus and
stage for infestation with papaya mealybug for Leptomastix, natural enemies of citrus mealybugs.
mass production purposes. Paracoccus margin- Bull Calif Agric Exp 797:39
Helen M, Chikkanna S, Balasaraswathi J, Ravikumar N,
atus, placed on 2025-day-old seedlings, was
Sakthivel N, Bindroo BB (2013) Hibiscus cannabinus
allowed to develop to the second instar, at which L. (Malvaceae) as an alternate host plant for mass-
time the plant was cut and transferred to plastic rearing of Paracoccus marginatus Williams and
containers having one thin layer of absorbent cot- Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and
their exotic parasitoids. In: Proceedings of 13th work-
ton covered with one layer of tissue paper. Based
shop of the IOBC Global working group on mass rear-
on the number of 2nd-instar mealybugs present, ing and quality assurance, Bangalore, India, 68 Nov
parasitoids were released at a ratio of 2:1 (para- 2013, pp 3940
sitoid to mealybug) into each container after Johnson T, Giliomee JH (2011) Evaluation of citrus, but-
ternut and sprouting potatoes as mass rearing sub-
which the cage was covered with muslin cloth.
strates for oleander mealybug, Paracoccus burnerae
For production of 20,000 parasitoids on the (Brain) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Afr J Biotechnol
mealybug using potatoes, the approximate cost 10:83208344
was Rs. 8700, whereas culturing done on H. can- Mineo G (1967) Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. Observations
on morphology and bionomics. Bull Inst Ent Agric
nabinus would require about Rs. 6700. It is con-
Oss Fitopat Palermo 6:99143
cluded that culturing of papaya mealybugs on H. Singh SP (1978) Propagation of a coccinellid beetle for
cannabinus is easy, economical and suitable for the biological control of citrus and coffee mealybugs.
tropical conditions and allows more effective Scientic Conference, CPA, Dec 1978, 2 p
Smith HS, Armitage HM (1920) Biological control of
mass production of the mealybug and its parasit-
mealybugs attacking citrus. Calif Agric Exp Stn Bull
oids (Helen et al. 2013). 9:104158
Sysoev AT (1953) The possibility of combining biological
and chemical methods in the control of pests of agri-
cultural crops. Dok Vseseovuz Akad Selkhoz Nauk
Lenin 18:2631
Mode of Spread of Mealybugs
8
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Mealybugs spread through various means. Local


and short-distance dispersal of mealybugs is facili- 8.2 Trade and Commerce
tated by air currents, ant movements, farm labour-
ers and farm implements. Long-range dispersal/ Dispersal is likely to occur more rapidly over
movement of mealybugs is usually accomplished longer distances with the movement of infested
by transport of infested plant material. Cotton plants in trade. The rapid spread from one coun-
mealybugs have the propensity to spread through try to another is most likely to be due to move-
natural carriers such as raw cotton, linted cotton ment of mealybugs in trade. Both the obscure
seeds, wind, water, rain, birds, human beings, ants mealybug Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) and
and farm animals. They have immense potential to the parasitoid are the new world species that
emerge as crop pests, thereby causing severe eco- coevolved in Chile and transported to Europe
nomic damage to a wide range of crops and pose a before the nineteenth century, arriving on the
grave threat to agriculture in the new area. roots and foliage of new world potatoes. The
spread of the papaya mealybug Paracoccus
marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink
8.1 Planting Material was also aided by the transport of the papaya
fruits infested with mealybugs from one state to
Infestations often begin with the purchase of another in India. Most of the invasive pests
infested plant material. The mealybug is pas- like Phenacoccus manihotti (Matile-Ferrero),
sively dispersed with the infested planting mate- Rastrococcus invadens Williams, Paracoccus
rial. Mealybugs are not noticed as they hide in marginatus etc. spread through the sale of plant-
protected sites, such as cracks and crevices in ing material, fruits or plants to other countries.
bark, leaf axils, root crowns, stems, under the
leaves and so on, when the population is very
low. The dispersal mechanism of rhizome- 8.3 Personnel
feeding root mealybugs is facilitated by the
movement of infested suckers. Plants with their associated insects must have
been carried to new areas by people for many
centuries, and people still carry the infested plant
M. Mani (*) C. Shivaraju
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, material, as seen by numerous quarantine inter-
Bangalore 560089, India ception records.
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 113


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_8
114 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

8.4 Irrigation Water 8.10 Ants

Root mealybugs spread through irrigation water Among the arthropods, ants have also been
from one spot to another. Besides, ood irriga- reported to disperse many mealybug species.
tion carries fallen leaves and other debris infested Ants are likely to carry the young mealybugs
with mealybugs from one spot to another. called as crawlers. Ants are known to transport
the mealybugs from plant to plant, between and
within elds, thus facilitating mealybug disper-
8.5 Air Currents sal. In California, it is often possible to see ant
Camponotus actually carrying the mealybugs
Some of the crawlers may be dispersed over lon- from its host plant, directly into the ants nest.
ger distances by air currents. Sticky trap collec- Ants are the primary or sole means of mealybug
tions revealed that Dysmicoccus neobrevipes dispersal in pineapple. Pheidole megacephala
Beardsley and D. brevipes (Cockerell) are dis- (F.) are seen carrying mealybugs from one pine-
persed by wind. In India, Paracoccus marginatus apple plant to another. The big-headed ant (P.
had spread very fast by wind dispersal of crawl- megacephala.), Argentine ant (Linepithema
ers from the state of Tamil Nadu to others. Aerial humile (Mayr)) and re ant (Solenopsis geminata
dispersal could be important in the colonization (F.)) are commonly found in the Hawaiian pine-
of mealybugs of new areas. apple agroecosystem, where they tend the mealy-
bugs for honeydew. These ants, especially P.
megacephala, have been blamed for dispersing
8.6 Animals mealybugs.

Mealybugs are known to cling to wild and domes-


tic animals. They get transported by the move- 8.11 Stage of the Mealybugs
ment of animals. and Dispersal

The female mealybugs being wingless and some


8.7 Transport even legless, are not highly vagile and always
have restricted distribution. Adult males and
The mealybugs clinging to the vehicles entering newly emerged rst-instar nymphs of most
from the infested orchards get transported to the mealybug species display active dispersal. Adult
other orchards. male mealybugs are winged. First-instar nymphs
(crawlers) have been found to possess numerous
characteristics that are considered as adaptations
8.8 Implements/Equipment for dispersal behaviour, including long legs and
antennae. After hatching, crawlers are very active
The dispersal of mealybugs is facilitated by farm and move to the upper leaves and tips of the plant,
implements/equipment during farm operations. and also from one plant to another. They move at
Harvesting equipment from the infested orchard a speed of 1.525 in. per minute. Other instars
carries the mealybugs from one place to another. remained immobile for the greater part of their
lives, infesting mainly the midrib, lateral veins
and growing points of the food plant. Only males
8.9 Farm Labourers of this insect have a winged life stage. First- and
second-instar nymphs of Pseudococcus longispi-
Farm labourers move from one orchard to nus (Targioni-Tozzetti) were found in sticky plate
another, especially at harvest time. Mealybugs traps erected around a commercial Josephine
are transported through their clothes, disposable pear block in Victoria, Australia. Of those
wares and shoes. trapped, 89 % were rst instars and 11 % second
8 Mode of Spread of Mealybugs 115

instars. Adult males are winged and capable of reducing the abundance of M. hirsutus with the
weak ight, but were caught on only 2 of the natural enemies, it would appear that many such
76 days of trapping. It is unlikely that the winged avenues for dispersal became ineffective.
males use the wind to assist them in dispersing to Presently, the spread of M. hirsutus is largely
new locations. Numbers of instars found in the limited to the transfer of mealybug life stages on
traps were positively related (p < 0.05) to the plants that are moved or especially ovisacs or
wind speed and to the square of the daily maxi- adult females on equipment. The cotton mealy-
mum temperatures. bug Ph. solenopsis was observed in 2006 and has
spread like wildre covering entire India within a
short time. Initially, hardly any parasitism was
8.12 Availability of Host Plant reported, but the absence of the parasitoid like
Aenasius bombawalei (later reported) aided in
Most of the mealybug species like spread of the mealybugs.
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green), Paracoccus
marginatus, Planococcus citri (Risso),
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead), Ferrisia virgata 8.14 Phoretic Method
(Cockerell), Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley,
Pseudococcus longispinus and Planococcus Reproductive females of the ant Acropyga epen-
lilacinus are highly polyphagous and known to dana Snelling participating in the ights are
attack hundreds of host plants aiding the spread known to carry the mealybug Rhizoecus colom-
of the mealybugs easily within the country. biensis (Hambleton) between mandibles indicat-
However, oligophagous cassava mealybug ing vertical transfer of mealybugs with their ant
Phenacoccus manihotti rst reported in 1973 hosts. Mealybugs and other scaled insects are
from Congo had become established in the whole known to cling to other insects like locusts and
cassava belt area by 1986, mainly due to the get dispersed during swarming. In another pho-
availability of cassava plants cultivated contigu- retic method, eggs and nymphs of Maconellicoccus
ously over a vast area in Africa. hirsutus were being transported by nymphs and
adult females of another mealybug, Ferrisia vir-
gata (Cockerell), in India.
8.13 Absence of Natural Enemies

There were several outbreaks of mealybugs. 8.15 Root Mealybugs


Mealybugs are usually well regulated by natural
enemies. Absence of natural enemies, particu- Under moist conditions, young root-mealybugs
larly in the case of invasive mealybugs, aids in or nymphs are active. They move short distances
the build-up of mealybugs and their spread rap- to adjacent plants. They may crawl from pot to
idly within the country. Most of the mealybugs pot via drainage holes. They are slow moving in
establish themselves easily in the new area and irrigation water, thereby facilitating the spread.
spread to the adjoining areas, in the absence of However, their dispersal potential is usually
naturally occurring predators, parasitoids and limited. Infestations often begin with the pur-
pathogens. Presence of natural enemies of M. hir- chase of infested plant material.
sutus has essentially stopped the natural spread
of the mealybug from the isolated desert region
to other areas of California. In 1999, millions of 8.16 Accidental Introduction
crawlers were produced per tree subject to an
array of methods of transport, including being The vine mealybug Planococcus cus (Signoret)
windblown or mechanically transferred by vehi- is an old world species that was accidentally
cles, trees, shrub pruning equipment, etc. By introduced into California in the early 1990s and
116 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

then it quickly spread to all major grape-growing countries, causing severe damage. Since its
areas. The mango mealybug Rastrococcus accidental introduction into the island of Grenada
invadens Williams was accidentally introduced in in 1994, Maconellicoccus hirsutus, native of
Africa in the early 1980s from South East Asia South Asia, has been inexorably spreading
into Ghana and later spread to most of the African throughout several Caribbean islands.
Damage
9
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Mealybugs throughout the world cause a variety amino acids and other nitrogen compounds
of economic problems. The most obvious dam- (Franco et al. 2000; Gullan and Martin 2003;
age is caused by the sucking habits of these Silva and Mexia 1999; Tonkyn and Whitcomb
insects. The damage caused by the mealybugs is 1987). Thus, except for sucrose hydrolysis,
linked to sap intake. Heavy infestations often food digestion is hardly necessary. However,
cause stunting or death of the plant host. At times, organic compounds in phloem sap need to be
mealybugs have toxins and act as vectors of cer- concentrated before they can be absorbed, and
tain viruses detrimental to plant life. this occurs in the lter chamber, a specialized
component of the digestive system, which
enables the direct passage of water from the
9.1 Feeding Process anterior midgut to the Malpighian tubules,
and Endosymbionts thereby concentrating food in the midgut (Terra
and Ferreira 2003). The residue of ingested
Mealybugs are phloem feeders. As they feed, phloem sap, after digestion and assimilation in
they produce a sugary excretion (honeydew) the insect gut, is released from the anus as a
that supports the growth of sooty mould. sugar-rich material, the honeydew. Up to 90 %
Mealybugs feed by inserting their stylets of the ingested sugars may be egested in this
through the plant tissue to suck up sap from way (Mittler and Douglas 2003).
either phloem or mesophyll, or both. Males ter- Mealybugs have an obligatory association
minate their feeding towards the end of the sec- with prokaryotic endosymbionts, probably
ond nymphal stage. Generally, stylet because of the suboptimal nutrition furnished by
penetration is accomplished by the secretion of phloem sap, which lacks essential nutrients.
solidied saliva that forms a sheath around the These endosymbionts are believed to be
stylets. Similarly to other members of the sub- important for the nitrogen and sterol require-
order Sternorrhyncha, which includes scale ments of their hosts and may play a role in resis-
insects, aphids, psyllids and whiteies, mealy- tance to microbial pathogens or in detoxication
bugs consume a diet containing mainly carbo- of plant secondary compounds (Baumann 2005;
hydrates as well as limited amounts of free Gullan and Kosztarab 1997). Within their body
cavities, mealybugs have a structure, the bacteri-
M. Mani (*) C. Shivaraju ome, which comprises specialized cells, the bac-
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, teriocytes, which harbour the primary
Bangalore 560089, India endosymbionts, that is, the P-endosymbionts
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 117


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_9
118 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

(Kono et al. 2008; Thao et al. 2002). The in the eld. For example, the citrus mealybug has
P-endosymbionts have the unusual property of been found on plants from 70 botanical families,
containing prokaryotic secondary endosymbi- 60 % of which are characterized as non-woody
onts, the S-endosymbionts, within their cyto- plants, whereas on the international scale, this
plasm (von Dohlen et al. 2001). During male mealybug is a pest of subtropical and tropical
development, the bacteriome progressively crops, such as citrus, persimmon, banana and
degenerates in the prepupa and pupa, and became custard apple, or it damages various types of
almost unrecognizable in the adult male (Kono plant species in interior landscapes, greenhouses
et al. 2008). in particular. Another example of the apparent
contradiction between the long lists of host plants
and the narrow ranges of damaged crops is the
9.1.1 Host Plants case of Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel; although
this mealybug is known from 35 host plant fami-
The various species of plants and animals have lies (Ben-Dov 2006), in Israel it causes damage
characteristic climatic requirements for growth, only to citrus trees. Under low pressure of natural
survival and reproduction, requirements that enemies, for example, when they spread in new
limit their geographic distribution, abundance environments, mealybugs are observed on rela-
and interactions with other species (Gutierrez tively large numbers of host plants, in contrast
et al. 1993). Mealybugs feed on a variety of her- with the situation when there is effective biologi-
baceous and woody plants, including the angio- cal control.
sperm, gymnosperm and fern families. However,
most of the species with known hosts develop on 9.1.1.1 Direct Damage
herbaceous plants, especially grasses (Poaceae) Mealybugs are phloem feeders that use long,
and composites (Asteraceae) (Ben-Dov 2006; slender mouthparts to suck out plant uids. Most
Kosztarab and Kozr 1988). As expected, infor- of the mealybugs can feed on the trunk, stem,
mation on the host ranges of mealybugs is mainly leaves, owers or fruits, and some on roots.
derived from observations of species of economic However, differences in the amount of damage
importance. Most species are apparently oligoph- caused by each species are often related to those
agous or stenophagous or monophagous, and factors that determine population size (e.g., num-
some are polyphagous (Ben-Dov 2006; Kosztarab ber of annual generations and female fecundity),
and Kozr 1988). However, such a characteriza- preferred feeding locations and temperature tol-
tion is problematic. Most of the economically erances. As the mealybugs feed, they excrete
important species are known to be associated carbohydrate-rich honeydew, which can accumu-
with long lists of hosts, and their performance late on the leaves and in the grape clusters, espe-
varies widely, ranging from development of high cially in late summer and early fall. The mealybug
population density, which eventually would kill icks honeydew away from its location, but it
the host plant, to poor development that renders still accumulates on the plant. It has long been
the survival of the population for several genera- noted that honeydew serves as a substrate for the
tions questionable. Plant growth conditions may development of sooty mould fungi that can result
strongly affect the success of the population: in further plant damage. For table-fruit growers,
under irrigation and fertilization, plant species any live or dead mealybugs and the honeydew or
become favourable hosts of mealybugs, whereas sooty moulds will cause cosmetic damage to fruit
in different environments the performance is usu- cluster and reduce its marketability. In most dried
ally poor. During laboratory studies, many of the fruits, juice and wine grapes, the contamination
mealybug pest species could be easily reared on from a small mealybug population, and the resul-
alternative hosts, such as potato sprouts or tant honeydew droplets, will not cause economic
squashes, which are not colonized by mealybugs damage. Although honeydew can be dissolved by
9 Damage 119

light rain and will dry in warm temperatures, problem to pineapple. Perhaps one of the most
when mealybug populations are severe, honey- important of these diseases is swollen shoot of
dew can accumulate to form a hard, wax-like cacao, transmitted by several mealybug vectors,
layer that covers the infested plant. A copious including Planococcoides njalensis (Laing) and
amount of honeydew gives the bark of the plant a Ferrisia virgala (Cockerell). This virus causes
water-soaked appearance. excessive damage to cacao trees each year.
Feeding damage can result in defoliation and,
after repeated annual infestations, cause vine
death. There are morpho-histological changes in 9.2 The Origin of Mealybug Pest
the plants due to the infestation of mealybugs on Status
plants like ramie (Boehmeria nivea), mulberry
(Morus alba), roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa var. Similarly to other insect pests, mealybugs have
altissima) and mesta (Hibiscus cannabinus) diverse origins, including endemics, immigrants
infested with nymphs of Maconellicoccus hirsu- and mutants (Kim 1993). An indigenous species
tus (Green). Morphologically, linear growth of may become a serious pest: when a susceptible
the stem and petiole was arrested and their thick- crop species is introduced into the area, follow-
ness was increased. The leaf lamina was mark- ing environmental disturbance or as a result of
edly reduced and distorted. Histologically, the stress conditions. Invasive mealybug species
cells were enlarged and suffered reduced ligni- may attain pest status as soon as they success-
cation. There was an increase in the number of fully colonize a new territory, and affect nega-
stomata, which varied in the different plants. tively crop yield, which may happen when they
Mealybug (Rastrococcus invadens Williams) encounter a susceptible host, either local or
infestation of fruits caused a signicant reduction exotic. Planococcus citri (Risso) is an intro-
in weight and size of mango fruits, and also ash duced pest in most citrus-growing areas of the
content, crude bre and reducing sugars in Sri globe. It may weaken young citrus saplings, but
Lanka (Tobih et al. 2002). barely affects the growth of fruit-bearing trees;
the damage is mainly due to fruit infestation.
9.1.1.2 Indirect Damage Two mealybug population trends were shown to
In most of the regions, the transmission of occur in citrus orchards in the Mediterranean
viruses, rather than mealybug feeding or contam- region (Franco et al. 2004): (1) outbreak dynam-
ination, is the primary concern. Several species ics, whereby the percentage of infested fruits
of mealybugs are vector-virus disease in crops (mainly by Pl. citri) typically increases expo-
like banana, blackpepper, grapevine, cocoa, pine- nentially, with maximal values higher than 30 %
apple, sugarcane etc. Severe infestations can being recorded during mid- to late summer, and
result in defoliation, cluster infestation and rot, as (2) non-outbreak dynamics, whereby the per-
shown for a Planococcus cus (Signoret) infesta- centage of infested fruits does not increase sig-
tion. There is a slight leaf chlorosis and phloem nicantly or, alternatively, exhibits only a small,
disruption. Grapevine leafroll virus infections relatively linear increase, with maximal values
impact the berry development and growth by lower than 30 %. Three major causes may lead
delaying budbreak, owering and berry matura- to mealybug outbreaks: (1) a recent invasion by
tion, including changes in colour, reduced sugar an exotic mealybug species, (2) the application
content and increased acidity in fruit juice. of non-selective pesticides, which disrupt the
Mealybug toxins are rather important in some biological balance, and (3) the effect of environ-
areas. The pineapple wilt in the Hawaiian Islands mental factors that might inuence the tritrophic
involves the pineapple mealybug, Dysmicoccus interactions among host-plant/mealybug/natural
brevipes (Cockerell), which is a serious economic enemies.
120 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

These were subdivided by Franco et al. (2004) The mechanisms involved in these two types of
as follows: outbreaks were discussed by Hardin et al. (1995),
and studied by Franco et al. (2004) with regard to
1. Recent invasion by exotic mealybug species the mealybug pests of citrus. Environmental fac-
(a) Lack of control by natural enemies tors (Cause 3) may also directly and indirectly
2. Application of non-selective pesticides affect the tritrophic interactions that develop
(a) Mortality differences between pests and between mealybugs, their host plants and their
their natural enemies natural enemies, thereby initiating mealybug out-
(b) Indirect effects of pesticides on natural breaks. Several mechanisms may be involved.
enemies, for example, elimination of their Host-plant characteristics may favour or be detri-
prey mental to the development, reproduction and sur-
(c) Effects on predator and parasitoid host vival of mealybugs (Boavida and Neuenschwander
interactions 1995; Calatayud et al. 1994b; Leru and Tertuliano
(d) Trophobiosis positive indirect effects of 1993; Nassar 2007; Tertuliano et al. 1993;
pesticides on pests, mediated through Wysoki et al. 1977; Yang and Sadof 1995). The
changes in the host plant resistance mechanisms of the host plant may
(e) Hormoligosis positive direct effects of become involved in both the xation (antixeno-
pesticides on pests sis) and the development of the mealybug (anti-
(f) Effects of pesticides on insect behavior biosis) (Tertuliano et al. 1993). Tertuliano and
(g) Effects of pesticides on interspecic com- Leru (1992) concluded that the different levels of
petition among phytophagous species of resistance to the cassava mealybug, P. manhioti,
different taxa which were observed in different varieties of cas-
3. Effect of environmental factors (tritrophic inter- sava, were not associated with the concentrations
actions: host-plant/mealybug/natural enemy) of amino acids or sugars, with the ratios between
(a) Host-plant susceptibility and/or host- these concentrations, or with the compositions of
plant characteristics amino acids obtained from leaf extracts. The
(b) Water stress identication and assay of cyanogenic and phe-
(c) Nitrogen fertilization nolic compounds in the phloem sap of cassava
(d) Weather and the honeydew of the cassava mealybug were
(e) Mealybug defences, for example, carried out by Calatayud et al. (1994a). Yang and
encapsulation Sadof (1995) showed that variegation in Coleus
(f) Mealybug refuges from natural enemies blumei could increase the abundance of the citrus
Spatial refuge (cryptic behavior), for mealybug, P. citri. Sadof et al. (2003) found that
example, under the bark and on roots the life-history characteristics of P. citri on
Temporal refuge: ant interactions Coleus blumei were not correlated with total
Other factors that may affect natural ene- amino acids and sucrose contents in stem exu-
mies, for example, intraguild predation dates, but were correlated negatively with the
and interference, hyperparasitoids proportions of shikimic acid precursors and posi-
tively with those of other nonessential amino
Cause 1 is well documented with regard to acids. Host-plant characteristics can also inu-
mealybug outbreaks and is mainly driven by the ence the performance of the natural enemies of
combination of host susceptibility and absence of mealybugs (Serrano and Lapointe 2002; Souissi
natural enemies in the invaded region (Ben-Dov and Leru 1997; Yang and Sadof 1997). Water-
1994; Blumberg et al. 1999; Muniappan et al. stressed plants may favour the population
2006; Nakahira and Arakawa 2006; Roltsch et al. increases of mealybugs (Calatayud et al. 2002;
2006; Williams and Granara de Willink 1992). Gutierrez et al. 1993; Lunderstadt 1998).
The use of non-selective pesticides (Cause 2) Mealybug life-history parameters/damage
may lead to resurgence and secondary outbreaks. may also be inuenced by the levels of nitrogen
9 Damage 121

fertilization and leaf nitrogen concentration; high Blumberg D, Ben-Dov Y, Mendel Z (1999) The citriculus
mealybug, Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel, and its
nitrogen concentrations were shown to lead to
natural enemies in Israel: history and present situation.
enhanced performance of the citrus mealybug, P. Entomologica Bari 33:233242
citri (Hogendorp et al. 2006). The antibiotic Boavida C, Neuenschwander P (1995) Inuence of host
resistance of two varieties of cassava mealybug plant on the mango mealybug, Rastrococcus invadens.
Entomol Exp Appl 76:179188
increased with the addition of nitrogen (Leru
Calatayud PA, Rahbe Y, Delobel B, Khuonghuu F,
et al. 1994). Survival of immature sugarcane Tertuliano M, Leru B (1994a) Inuence of secondary
mealybugs, S. sacchari, increased to a maximum compounds in the phloem sap of cassava on expres-
at a soluble nitrogen concentration of 320 mg L1 sion of antibiosis towards the mealybug Phenacoccus
manihoti. Entomol Exp Appl 72:4757
in sugarcane, and decreased at higher levels,
Calatayud PA, Tertuliano M, Leru B (1994b) Seasonal
whereas mealybug size increased with increasing changes in secondary compounds in the phloem sap of
nitrogen concentration over the whole tested cassava in relation to plant genotype and infestation by
range (Rae and Jones 1992). Weather conditions, Phenacoccus manihoti (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae).
Bull Entomol Res 84:453459
especially temperature and relative humidity, are
Calatayud PA, Polania MA, Seligmann CD, Bellotti AC
major ecological factors that affect both mealy- (2002) Inuence of water-stressed cassava on
bugs and their natural enemies (Chong and Phenacoccus herreni and three associated parasitoids.
Oetting 2007; Gutierrez et al. 1993, 2008a; Entomol Exp Appl 102:163175
Chong JH, Oetting RD (2007) Intraguild predation and
Nakahira and Arakawa 2006). Encapsulation
interference by the mealybug predator Cryptolalemus
may adversely affect the degree of biological montrouzieri on the parasitoid Leptomastix dactylopii.
control exerted by mealybug parasitoids, as it Biocontrol Sci Tech 17:933944
may either prevent the establishment of exotic Franco JC, Silva EB, Carvalho JP (2000) Mealybugs
(Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae) associated with citrus in
parasitoids in new regions or reduce parasitoid
Portugal. ISA Press, Lisbon (in Portuguese)
efcacy (Blumberg 1997). The cryptic behavior Franco JC, Suma P, da Silva EB, Blumberg D, Mendel Z
and tending of mealybugs by ants may, respec- (2004) Management strategies of mealybug pests of
tively, originate spatial and temporal refuges citrus in Mediterranean countries. Phytoparasitica
32:507522
from natural enemies. Several other factors may
Gullan PC, Kosztarab M (1997) Adaptations in scale
affect mealybugs natural enemies, which include insects. Annu Rev Entomol 42:2350
intraguild predation and interference (Chong and Gullan P, Martin JH (2003) Sternorrhyncha (jumping
Oetting 2007), and hyperparasitoids (Moore and plant lice, whiteies, aphids, and scale insects). In:
Resh VH, Card RT (eds) Encyclopedia of insects.
Cross 1992).
Academic, Amsterdam
Gutierrez AP, Neuenschwander P, Vanalphen JJM (1993)
Factors affecting biological control of cassava mealy-
References bug by exotic parasitoids a ratio-dependent supply-
demand driven model. J Appl Ecol 30:706721
Hardin MR, Benrey B, Coll M, Lamp WO, Roderick GK,
Baumann P (2005) Biology of bacteriocyte-associated
Barbosa P (1995) Arthropod pest resurgence: an over-
endosymbionts of plant sap-sucking insects. Annu
view of potential mechanisms. Crop Prot 14:318
Rev Microbiol 59:155189
Hogendorp BK, Cloyd RA, Swiader JM (2006) Effect of
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
nitrogen fertility on reproduction and development of
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homptera: Coccoidea:
citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri Risso (Homoptera:
Pseudoccocidae and Putoidae) with data on their geo-
Pseudococcidae), feeding on two colors of coleus,
graphical distribution, host plants, biology and eco-
Solenostemon scutellarioides L. Codd. Environ
nomic importance. Intercept, Andover
Entomol 35:201211
Ben-Dov Y (2006) Scales in a family/genus query.
Kim KC (1993) Insect pests and evolution. In: Kim KC,
Available at http://www.sel.barc.usda.gov/scalecgi/
McPheron BA (eds) Evolution of insect pests: patterns
chklist.exe?Family=Pseudococcidae&genus .
of variation. Wiley, New York
Accessed 14 Aug 2008
Kono M, Koga R, Shimada M, Fukatsu T (2008) Infection
Blumberg D (1997) Parasitoid encapsulation as a defense
dynamics of coexisting beta- and gammaproteobacte-
mechanism in the Coccoidea (Homoptera) and its
ria in the nested endosymbiotic system of mealybugs.
importance in biological control. Biol Control
Appl Environ Microbiol 74:41754184
8:225236
122 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Kosztarab M, Kozr F (1988) Scale insects of Central Silva EB, Mexia A (1999) Histological studies on the sty-
Europe. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht let pathway, feeding sites and nature of feeding dam-
Leru B, Tertuliano M (1993) Tolerance of different host- age by Planococcus citri (Risso) (Homoptera:
plants to the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Pseudococcidae) in sweet orange. Entomol Bari
Matile-Ferrero (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae). Int 33:347350
J Pest Manag 39:379384 Souissi R, Leru B (1997) Effect of host plants on fecun-
Leru B, Diangana J, Beringar N (1994) Effects of nitrogen dity and development of Apoanagyrus lopezi, an endo-
and calcium on the level of resistance of cassava to the parasitoid of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus
mealybug P manihoti. Insect Sci Appl 51:8796 manihoti. Entomol Exp Appl 82:235238
Lunderstadt J (1998) Impact of external factors on the Terra WR, Ferreira C (2003) Digestive system. In: Resh
population dynamics of beech scale (Cryptococcus VH, Card RT (eds) Encyclopedia of insects.
fagisuga) (Hom., Pseudococcidae) in beech (Fagus Academic, Amsterdam
sylvatica) stands during the latency stage. J Appl Tertuliano M, Leru B (1992) Interaction between cassava
Entomol/Zeits Angew Entomol 122:319322 mealybugs (Phenacoccus manihoti) and their host
Mittler TE, Douglas AE (2003) Honeydew. In: Resh VH, plants amino-acid and sugar contents of sap. Entomol
Card RT (eds) Encyclopedia of insects. Academic, Exp Appl 64:19
Amsterdam Tertuliano M, Dossougbete S, Leru B (1993) Antixenotic
Moore D, Cross AE (1992) Competition between two pri- and antibiotic components of resistance to the cassava
mary parasitoids, Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes and mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti (Homoptera,
Anagyrus mangicola Noyes, attacking the mealybug Pseudococcidae) in various hostplants. Insect Sci Appl
Rastrococcus invadens Williams and the inuence of a 14:657665
hyperparasitoid Chartocerus hyalipennis Hayat. Thao ML, Gullan PJ, Baumann P (2002) Secondary
Biocontrol Sci Technol 2:225234 (gamma-proteobacteria) endosymbionts infect the pri-
Muniappan R, Meyerdirk DE, Sengebau FM, Berringer mary (beta-proteobacteria) endosymbionts of mealy-
DD, Reddy GVP (2006) Classical biological control bugs multiple times and coevolve with their hosts.
of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Appl Environ Microbiol 68:31903197
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the Republic of Tobih FO, Omoloye AA, Ivbijaro MF, Enobakhare DA
Palau. Fla Entomol 89:212217 (2002) Effects if eld infestation by Rastrococcus
Nakahira K, Arakawa R (2006) Development and repro- invadens Williams (Hemiptera; Pseudococcidae) on
duction of an exotic pest mealybug, Phenacoccus the morphology and nutritional status of mango fruits
solani (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) at three constant Mangifera indica. Crop Prot 21:751761
temperatures. Appl Entomol Zool 41:573575 Tonkyn DW, Whitcomb RF (1987) Feeding strategies and
Nassar NMA (2007) Cassava genetic resources and their the guild concept among vascular feeding insects and
utilization for breeding of the crop. Genet Mol Res microorganisms. In: Harris KF (ed) Current topics in
6:11511168 vector research, vol 4. Springer, New York
Rae DJ, Jones RE (1992) Inuence of host nitrogen levels von Dohlen CD, Kohler S, Alsop ST, McManus WR
on development, survival, size and population- (2001) Mealybug beta-proteobacterial endosymbionts
dynamics of sugarcane mealybug, Saccharicoccus contain gamma-proteobacterial symbionts. Nature
sacchari (Cockerell) (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae). 412:433436
Aust J Zool 40:327342 Williams DJ, Granara de Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs
Roltsch WJ, Meyerdirk DE, Warkentin R, Andress ER, of Central and South America. CABI, Wallingford
Carrera K (2006) Classical biological control of the pink Wysoki M, Izhar Y, Swirski E, Gurevitz E, Greenberg S
hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) in (1977) Susceptibility of avocado varieties to long-
southern California. Biol Control 37:155166 tailed mealybug, Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni
Sadof CS, Neal JJ, Cloyd RA (2003) Effect of variegation Tozzetti) (Homoptera- Pseudococcidae), and a survey
on stem exudates of coleus and life history character- of its host plants in Israel. Phytoparasitica 5:140148
istics of citrus mealybug (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Yang JS, Sadof CS (1995) Variegation in Coleus blumei
Environ Entomol 32:463469 and the life history of citrus mealybug (Homoptera:
Serrano MS, Lapointe SL (2002) Evaluation of host plants Pseudococcidae). Environ Entomol 24:16501655
and a meridic diet for rearing Maconellicoccus hirsu- Yang JS, Sadof CS (1997) Variation in the life history of
tus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and its parasitoid the citrus mealybug parasitoid Leptomastix dactylopii
Anagyrus kamali (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Fla (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on three varieties of
Entomol 85:417425 Coleus blumei. Environ Entomol 26:978982
Mealybugs as Vectors
10
R. Selvarajan, V. Balasubramanian,
and B. Padmanaban

Mealybugs are well-known sap-sucking insects 10.1 Feeding Behaviour


which transmit plant viruses. They are omnipres- of Mealybugs
ent, polyphagous, can cause more damage as
pests and are less uncommon as virus vectors. Mealybugs are found in moist and warm cli-
The feeding behavior of these vectors has pro- mates. They are less mobile on plants than other
found ecological and evolutionary implications groups of vectors, such as aphids and leaf hop-
for the viruses they transmit, as the acquisition pers, a feature that makes them relatively inef-
and inoculation of viruses occurs during vector cient as virus vectors. They spread from one plant
feeding. In most cases, there is an intimate rela- to another when in contact with them, and crawl-
tionship between the virus and its vector, and no ing nymphs move more readily than adults. Adult
transmissions occur without the insects feeding females can be extremely polyphagous and feed
in a specic manner. This feeding behavior often by sucking on plant sap. The stylet pathway to
causes considerable economic loss to agriculture the phloem is intercellular and contains several
through direct damage to crops and via virus intracellular punctures (Calatayud et al. 1994).
transmission (Golino et al. 2002; Miiler et al. These bugs have less control over ne stylet
2002). They are considered pests as they feed on movements than aphids and produce fewer
the plant juices of economically important crop (820/h) and longer intracellular punctures (20 s)
plants, and also act as vectors for several plant along the entire route to the phloem (Calatayud
viral diseases. The transmission of the plant virus et al. 1994; Cid and Fereres 2010). Mealybugs
species belonging to Caulimoviridae and rarely produce brief probes; they often reach the
Closteroviridae by different species of mealy- phloem after a single probe, and it takes a rela-
bugs is furnished in detail in this chapter. tively long time to reach the phloem. Some mealy
bugs are unable to tap into the phloem sieve ele-
ments even after a period of 20 h, but most are
able to reach the phloem in 16 h (Calatayud
et al. 1994; Cid and Fereres 2010). Mealybug sty-
lets are exceedingly long and are coiled within
R. Selvarajan (*) V. Balasubramanian their body when they are not feeding.
National Research Centre for Banana,
This unique morphology of their mouth may
Tiruchirapalli 620 102, India
e-mail: selvarajanr@gmail.com explain the propensity of mealybugs to make a
single stylet insertion and their inability to reach
B. Padmanaban
ICAR-National Research Centre for Banana, the phloem quickly, as is seen with other
Tiruchirappalli 620 102, India hemipterans. Once in the phloem, the mealybugs

Springer India 2016 123


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_10
124 R. Selvarajan et al.

may continue to feed from the same sieve tube aphid transmitted viruses; apparently, the virus is
for several days. Xylem ingestion is also a pre- carried on or near the stylets of the mealybug.
dominant feeding behavior for some mealybug
species (Calatayud et al. 1994; Cid and Fereres
2010). 10.3 Plant Viruses Transmitted
by Mealybugs

10.2 Types of Transmission 10.3.1 Viruses of Caulimoviridae

Mealybugs are phloem feeders, and a minimum Nineteen species of mealybugs belonging to 13
inoculation time of 15 min is needed for success- genera are known to occur on Musaceae (Watson
ful transmission. The virus persists through the and Kubiriba 2005). The Banana streak virus
moult, and for 23 days in starved or feeding vec- (BSVs) (Fig. 10.1a) is transmitted by Planococcus
tors. All mealybug-transmitted viruses appear to citri (Risso) and Saccharicoccus sacchari
have a semi-persistent mode of transmission (Cockerell), both of which colonize bananas
based on retention times; however, the Grapevine (Lockhart et al. 1992). Sugarcane bacilliform
leafroll-associated virus 3 (GLRaV-3) was found virus (SCBV) is serologically related to BSVs
in the salivary glands of its mealybug vector, (Lockhart and Autrey 1988), and is reported to be
suggesting a circulative mode of transmission transmitted from sugarcane to banana by
(Cid et al. 2007). Mealybug-transmitted viruses Saccharicoccus sacchari (Cockerell) (Lockhart
appear to have a high rate of acquisition and a and Olszewski 1993). Experimental transmission
low rate of inoculation (Cid and Fereres 2010). of BSVs has also been demonstrated with the
Ants that tend to carry the mealybugs may move pink pineapple mealybug Dysmicoccus brevipes
them from one plant to another (Sether et al. (Cockerell) (Kubiriba et al. 2001) and
1998), and occasionally, long-distance dispersal Pseudococcus comstocki (Kuwana) (Su 1998).
by wind may also occur. An important factor Ferrisia virgata (striped mealybug) (Fig. 10.1b)
contributing to the slow rate of spread is that has been found to be able to transmit the Banana
newly infected trees are not infective for some streak Mysore Virus (BSMYV) from banana to
weeks, or even months, and the virus may not banana (Selvarajan et al. 2006). Meyer et al.
become fully systemic in large trees for at least 1 (2008) reported that the transmission of activated
year. Temperature-mediated mealybug activity episomal Banana streak OL virus (BSOLV) to
may be an important variable in transmission cv. Williams banana (Musa sp.) by three mealy
efciency, and the virus spread can occur through bug species, viz. Dysmicoccus brevipes,
the airborne dispersal of young, GLRaV-3- Planococcus citri and P. cus.
infected crawlers (Cabaleiro and Segura 1997). Planococcus citri transmitted episomal
Cacao swollen shoot virus (CSSV) is transmitted BSOLV and the Banana streak GF virus
in a semi-persistent mode, meaning that the virus (BSGFV) from tissue-culture derived plants of
is taken up into the vector's circulatory system FHIA-4 to cv. Williams plants. Using FHIA-TC
but does not replicate within it (Dzahini-Obiatey 10 as the donor plant for transmission, the vector
et al. 2010). The feeding period required for the transmitted a 100 % episomal BSOLV to
acquisition of the virus is a minimum of 20 min, Williamss plants after 3 months, and the num-
but optimally 24 days (Posnette and Robertson bers of mealybugs feeding on individual recipi-
1950). Once acquired, the virus can be transmit- ent plants during the inoculation access period
ted within 15 min, but optimal transmission (IAP) ranged from 2 to 25 (Meyer et al. 2008).
occurs 210 h after acquisition. No transmission Episomal BSVs were transmitted by D. brevipes.
of the virus occurs through the mealybug eggs. At 3 months post transmission, the virus was
The relationship between the CSSV and mealy- detected and symptoms had appeared. Due to the
bugs has some similarities to the non- persistent reluctance of the mealybugs to move to Musa spp.,
10 Mealybugs as Vectors 125

a b c

e f g

h i j

Fig. 10.1 (a) Electron micrograph of BSV; (b) Ferrisia Electron micrograph of GVB; (g) Vine mealybug; (h)
virgata feeding on banana; (c) Pink pineapple mealybug, Symptoms of BSV in banana; (i) GLRaV infected grape-
Dysmicoccus brevipes; (d) Gray pineapple mealybug, D. vine; (j) Symptoms of mealybug wilt of pineapple
neobrevipes; (e) Electron micrograph of GLRaV; (f)

the low numbers survived the inoculation access et al. 2008). The fact that none of the mealybug
period; the virus was transmitted from the TC-5 species were able to transmit integrated BSOLV
to the William banana. However, no episomal from the FHIA-4 to Williams proves that the inte-
BSGFV could be transmitted by D. brevipes from grated form of BSV is not likely to be transmitted
the FH-4 donor to the recipient plants (Meyer by mealybugs; even highly efcient mealybugs
126 R. Selvarajan et al.

such as P. citri were unable to transfer any inte- PMWaV-2 infection and mealybug feeding are
grated viral sequences to the receptor plants. necessary for the development of mealybug wilt
Episomal BSV in tissue culture-derived tetra- disease (Hu and Sether 1999a, b; Sether and Hu
ploids is highly transmissible by efcient mealy- 2002a, b). All pineapple plants with wilt disease
bug vectors to Cavendish varieties. have PMWaV-2 infections, but not necessarily
Cocoa swollen shoot virus (CSSV), a badna- PMWaV-1 infections (Hu et al. 1997; Sether and
virus, is transmitted by at least 14 species of Hu 2002a). Several species of ants are associated
mealybugs of the family Pseudococcidae within with mealybugs (Beardsley et al. 1982; Carter
the Coccoidae (Roivainen 1976), but 1963). These ants assist in the establishment of
Planococcoides njalensis and Planococcus citri mealybug colonies, consuming the honeydew
are the most important vectors (Dongo and produced by the mealybugs (Petty and Tustin
Orisajo 2007). Piper Yellow Mottle Virus 1993), and can have a suppressive effect on the
(PYMV) is transmitted by the citrus mealybug, natural enemies of mealybugs (Jahn 1992).
Planococcus citri (Lockhart et al. 1997). Bhat Sether et al. (1998) reported that presence of ants
et al. (2003) reported that PYMV could easily be was correlated with an increased rate of virus
transmitted by the mealybugs (Ferrisia virgata) spread when caged with D. brevipes. All stages
from naturally diseased black pepper to healthy of D. neobrevipes acquire PMWaV, although
seedlings of black pepper. The initial symptoms vector efciency decreased signicantly in older
of the disease, like vein clearing and chlorotic adult females; the probability of a single third-
mottle, could be seen in 14 of the 20 test plants in instar immature transmitting the virus was 0.04.
5 weeks after inoculation. Macanawai et al. Both the species of the mealybugs acquired and
(2005) reported that the Taro bacilliform virus transmitted the PMWaV from infected pineapple
(TaBV) is transmitted by Pseudococcus material.
solomonensis. The Grapevine leafroll disease is caused by
grapevine leafroll-associated viruses (GLRaVs)
(Fig. 10.1e). These viruses are common in vine-
10.4 Viruses Belonging yards worldwide, and are often associated with
to Closteroviridae vitiviruses that are involved in the rugose wood
complex of grapevines. Ten mealybug species are
Mealybug-vectored viruses often exist as a com- known as vectors of one or several of these grape-
plex of viruses, such as the mealybug wilt of vine viruses, including the apple mealybug
pineapple complex, which is made up of three Phenacoccus aceris, which is widespread, and is
pineapple mealybug wilt-associated viruses able to transmit the Grapevine leafroll-associated
(PMWaV) (Sether et al. 1998, 2005; Sether and virus-1 and -3 (GLRaV-1 and -3). Vitiviruses,
Hu 2002a, b) and Grapevine leafroll-associated namely Grapevine virus A (GVA), Grapevine
viruses. Mealybug wilt of pineapple is a major virus B (GVB) (Fig. 10.1f), Grapevine virus D
constraint in the global production of pineapple (GVD) and Grapevine virus E (GVD), infect
(Carter 1934, 1942; Rohrbach et al. 1988; grape vines, and these are transmitted by the
Wakman et al. 1995). Carter (1934, 1942, 1949, members of several insect genera (Pseudococcus,
1962) found an association between mealybugs, Planococcus, Phenacoccus, Heliococcus,
particularly the pink pineapple mealybug, Neopulvinaria, Parthenolecanium, Cavariella
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell), (Fig. 10.1c) and Ovatus) in a semi-persistent manner (La
and the gray pineapple mealybug, D. neobrevipes Notte et al. 1997; Rosciglione et al. 1983; Garau
(Beardsley) (Fig. 10.1d), and wilt throughout the et al. 1995). Tsai et al. (2010; Le Maguet et al.
pineapple-growing regions of the world. 2012) studied the virusvector specicity analy-
PMWaV-1 infections are correlated with growth sis for mealybug transmission of GLRaVs. Plants
reductions of the plant crop (Sether and Hu infected with several GLRaVs virus species were
1998), and yield reductions in the ratoon crop. screened for vector transmission by the mealybug
10 Mealybugs as Vectors 127

Table 10.1 Mealybug transmitted plant viruses


Virus, genus and family Vector species Mode of transmission Reference
Banana streak virus sps, Dysmicoccus brevipes, Semi-persistent Meyer et al. (2008),
Badnavirus, Caulimoviridae Planococcus citri, Pl. cus, Kubiriba et al. (2001),
Pseudococcus longispinus, Selvarajan et al. (2006)
Ferrisia virgata
Sugarcane bacilliform virus Saccharicoccus sacchari Semi-persistent Lockhart et al. (1997)
sp. Badnavirus,
Caulimoviridae
Piper yellow mottle virus; Planococcus citri Semi-persistent Lockhart et al. (1997),
Badnavirus, Caulimoviridae Pseudococcus elisae Bhat et al. (2003)
F. virgata
Taro bacilliform Badnavirus, Pseudococcus solomonensis Semi-persistent Macanawai et al.
Caulimoviridae (2005)
Schefera ringspot virus Planococcus citri Semi-persistent Lockhart and
(SRV) Olszewski (1996)
Cacoa swollen shoot virus, Planococcoides njalensis, Pl. Semi persistent Roivainen (1976)
Badnavirus, Caulimoviridae citri, F. virgata
Pineapple mealybug wilt Dysmicoccus brevipes Semi-persistent Sether et al. (1998)
associated virus-13; (Cockerell)
Closterovirus; Closteroviridae D. neobrevipes
GLRaV-1, 39; Ampelovirus, Heliococcus bohemicus, Semi-persistent Tsai et al. (2012)
Closteroviridae Phenacoccus aceris Signoret,
Planococcus cus
Pseudococcus longispinus,
Pseudococcus viburni,
Pseudococcus calceolariae,
Pseudococcus maritimus, Pl.
citri
Grapevine virus A, B, D and Pseudococcus, Planococcus, Semi-persistent Garau et al. (1995), Le
E, Vitivirus, Betaexiviridae, Phenacoccus, Heliococcus Maguet et al. (2012)
Little Cherry Virus 2 Phenacoccus aceris Semi-persistent Raine et al. (1986)
Closterovirus, Closteroviridae

species Planococcus cus and Pseudococoucus (AAP) and peaked with a 24-h AAP, after which
longispinus. The results revealed that P. longispi- the transmission rate remained constant. In addi-
nus had transmitted the GLRaV-9 to the inocu- tion, the GLRaV-3 was found not to have been
lated plants, and showed that 18 % of the transovarially transmitted from infected females
inoculated plats were positive for GLRaV-9, but to their progeny (Table 10.1).
none of the inoculated plants were found positive Mealybugs are less mobile on the plant com-
for GLRaV-5, tested 9 months after the inocula- pared with groups of vectors such as aphids and
tion. Planococcus cus transmitted the GLRaV- leaf hoppers, a feature that makes them relatively
1,3,4,5,9 and GVA. This study showed that there inefcient as virus vectors. Mostly, the mealybug-
was no evidence of mealybugGLRaV specic- transmitted viruses appear to have a semi-
ity. Tsai et al. (2008) reported that the vine persistent mode of transmission based on
mealybug (Planococcus cus) (Fig. 10.1g) trans- retention times. Mealybug-transmitted viruses
mits GLRaV- 3 in a semi-persistent manner. First appear to have a high rate of acquisition and low
instars were more efcient vectors than adult rate of inoculation. Mealybug-vectored viruses
mealybugs, but the GLRaV-3 transmission lacked often exist as a complex of viruses, such as the
a latent period in the vector. Virus transmission mealybug-associated viruses. Badnaviruses such
occurred with a 1-h acquisition access period as PYMV, BSVs TaBV and CSSV have been
128 R. Selvarajan et al.

shown to transmit by different mealybug species. 34 years (Fig. 10.1j) (Crowdy and Posnette
In all of these studies, the interaction of the 1947). The impact of mealybug feeding and
mealybug vector with the virus and the host is Pineapple mealybug wilt associated virus-1
lacking; hence it is necessary to generate funda- (PMWaV-1), PMWaV-2 infection on pineapple
mental knowledge about the interaction of the yield and the spread of PMWaV-1 and mealybug
vector, the host and the virus system to develop wilt of pineapple (MWP) were evaluated under
effective disease management strategies for viral eld conditions; the results showed a 35 % reduc-
diseases. Epidemiological studies are also tion in yield when compared with PMWaV-free
required to predict the spread of the plant viruses plants (Sether and Hu 2002b). If MWP develops
through mealybugs, and the changing climatic during the rst 3 months of the plant crop, it can
conditions need to be considered while develop- lead to a 55 % reduction in average fruit weight,
ing forecasting models of disease spread. compared with fruits from PMWaV-free plants.

10.5 Loss Due to Mealybug- 10.6 Management


Transmitted Virus Diseases
The best way to manage the virus diseases trans-
Comprehensive analysis of yield loss due to mitted by mealybugs is to ensure that purchase of
mealybug infection has not been carried out in planting material is from virus-tested and virus-
many of the crops, however, the infection of free mother plants, and the control of
mealybug-transmitted viruses leads to drastic vectors mealybugs.
yield losses have been reported. Estimated yield
losses of between 7 % and 90 % have been attrib-
uted to the banana streak disease in different References
parts of the world (Harper et al. 2004; Lockhart
et al. 1998; Davis et al. 2000; Daniells et al. Beardsley JW Jr, Su TH, McEwen FL, Gerling D (1982)
Field investigations on the interrelationships of the
2001). In India, a yield loss of 49.48 % has been
big-headed ant, thegray mealybug, and pineapple wilt
recorded in cv. Poovan (Mysore, AAB) due to disease in Hawaii. Proc Hawaii Entomol Soc
BSV (Fig. 10.1h) (Thangavelu et al. 2000). In 24:5167
banana, the yield loss due to BSV is inuenced Bhat AI, Devasahayam S, Sarma YR, Pant RP (2003)
Association of a badnavirus in black pepper (Piper
by the cultivar, the virus species infecting, and
nigrum L.) transmitted by mealybug (Ferrisia virgata)
environmental conditions. Grapevine leafroll dis- in India. Curr Sci 84(12):15471550
ease occurs in all the major grape-growing Cabaleiro C, Segura A (1997) Field transmission of grape-
regions of the world, causing reductions in pro- vine leafroll associated virus 3 (GLRaV-3) by the
mealybug Planococcus citri. Plant Dis 81:283287
ductivity and quality of both wine and table
Calatayud PA, Rahbe Y, Tjallingii WF, Tertuliano M, Leru
grapes. B (1994) Electrically recorded feeding-behavior of
Infected grapevines (Fig. 10.1i) result in cassava mealybug on host and nonhost plants. Entomol
reduced berry yields, delayed maturity and poor Exp Appl 72:219232
Carter W (1934) Mealybug wilt and green spot in Jamaica
pigmentation. Estimated yield losses of as much
and Central America. Phytopathology 24:424426
as 3040 % due to Grapevine leafroll disease has Carter W (1942) The geographical distribution of mealy-
been recorded (Maree et al. 2013). In addition, bug wilt with notes on some other insect pests of pine-
the disease agent has been implicated in certain apple. J Econ Entomol 35:1015
Carter W (1949) Insect notes from South America with
types of graft incompatibility and young vine
special reference to Pseudococcus brevipes and
failure. Cacao swollen-shoot virus (CSSV) mealybug wilt. J Econ Entomol 42:761766
infects cacao trees and has a major effect on crop Carter W (1962) Insects in relation to plant disease. Wiley,
yields. Within 1 year of infection by CSSV, the New York, pp 238265
Carter W (1963) Mealybug wilt of pineapple: a reap-
yield decreases by 25 % and by 50 % within 2
praisal. Ann N Y Acad Sci 105:741764
years. The infected trees are usually killed within
10 Mealybugs as Vectors 129

Cid M, Fereres A (2010) Characterization of the probing to grapevine by Phenacoccus aceris. Phytopathology
and feeding behavior of Planococcus citri (Hemiptera: 102:717723
Pseudococcidae) on grapevine. Ann Entomol Soc Am Lockhart BEL, Autrey JC (1988) Occurrence in sugarcane
103:404417 of a bacilliform virus related serologically to banana
Cid M, Pereira S, Cabaleiro C, Faoro F, Segura A (2007) streak virus. Plant Dis 72:230233
Presence of Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 in Lockhart BEL, Olszewski NE (1993) Serological and
primary salivary glands of the mealybug vector genomic heterogeneity of banana streak badnavirus:
Planococcus citri suggests a circulative transmission implications for virus detection in Musa germplasm.
mechanism. Eur J Plant Pathol 118:2330 In: Proceedings of international symposium on genetic
Crowdy SH, Posnette AF (1947) Virus diseases of cacao improvement of bananas for resistance to diseases and
in West Africa. II Cross-immunity experiments with pests, Montpellier (FRA), 1992/09/7-9. Breeding
viruses 1A, 1B, 1C. Ann Appl Biol 34:403411 banana and plantain for resistance to diseases and
Daniells JW, Geering ADW, Bryde NJ, Thomas JE (2001) pests. CIRAD-FLHOR, Montpellier, pp 105113
The effect of Banana streak virus on the growth and Lockhart BEL, Olszewski NE (1996) Schefera ringspot
yield of dessert bananas in tropical Australia. Ann virus, a widely distributed mealybug-transmitted bad-
Appl Biol 139:5160 navirus occurring in Schefera and Aralia. Acta Hortic
Davis RI, Geering ADW, Thomas JE, Gunua TG, 432:196200
Rahamma S (2000) First records of Banana streak Lockhart BEL, Autrey LJC, Comstock JC (1992) Partial
virus on the island of New Guinea. Aust Plant Pathol purication and serology of sugarcane mild mosaic
29:281 virus, a mealybug transmitted closterolike virus.
Dongo LN, Orisajo SB (2007) Status of cocoa swollen Phytopathology 82:691695
shoot virus disease in Nigeria. Afr J Biotechnol Lockhart BEL, Kiratiya-Angul K, Jones P, Eng L, De
6:20542061 Silva P, Olszewski NE, Deema N, Sangalang J (1997)
Dzahini-Obiatey H, Domfeh O, Amoah FM (2010) Over Identication of Piper yellow mottle virus, a mealybug-
seventy years of a viral disease of cocoa in Ghana: transmitted badnavirus infecting Piper spp. in south-
from researchers perspective. Afr J Agric Res east Asia. Eur J Plant Pathol 103:303311
5:476485 Lockhart BEL, Ndowora TC, Olszewski NE, Dahal G
Garau R, Prota VA, Boscia D, Fiori M, Prota U (1995) (1998) Studies on integration of banana streak
Pseudococcus afnis mask., new vector of grapevine Badnavirus sequences in Musa: identication of
trichoviruses A and B. Vitis 34:6768 episomally-expressible badnaviral integrants in Musa
Golino DA, Sim ST, Gill R, Rowhani A (2002) California genotypes. In: Frison EA, Sharrock SE (eds) Banana
mealybugs can spread grapevine leafroll disease. Calif streak virus: a unique virus-Musa interaction?
Agric 56:196201 Proceedings of workshop of the PROMUSA Virol.
Harper G, Hart D, Moult S, Hull R (2004) Banana streak Working group held in Montpellier, France, 1921 Jan
virus is very diverse in Uganda. Virus Res 1998
100:5156 Macanawai AR, Ebenebe AA, Hunter D, Devitt LC,
Hu JS, Sether DM (1999a) Etiology of mealybug wilt of Hafner GJ, Harding RM (2005) Investigations into the
pineapple. In: Abstracts in Xth international congress seed and mealybug transmission of Taro bacilliform
of virology. Sydney, Australia, p 321 virus. Aust Plant Pathol 34(1):7376
Hu JS, Sether DM (1999b) Mealybugs and pineapple Maree HJ, Almeida RP, Bester R, Chooi KM, Cohen D,
mealybug wilt associated virus are both necessary for Doljam VV, Fuchs MF, Golino DA, Jooste AE,
mealybug wilt (Abstr.). Phytopathology 89:S70 Martelli GP, Naidu RA, Rowhani A, Saldarelli P,
Hu JS, Sether DM, Liu XP, Wang M, Zee F, Ullman DE Burger JT (2013) Grapevine leafroll-associated virus
(1997) Use of a tissue blotting immunoassay to exam- 3. Front Microbiol 4:82. doi:10.3389/
ine the distribution of pineapple closterovirus in fmicb.2013.00082. 2013 Apr 16
Hawaii. Plant Dis 81:11501154 Meyer JB, Kasdorf GGF, Nel LH, Pietersen G (2008)
Jahn GC (1992) The ecological signicance of the big- Transmission of activated-episomal banana streak OL
headed ant in mealybug wilt disease of pineapple. PhD (badna) virus (BSOLV) to cv. Williams banana (Musa
thesis, University of Hawaii, Honolulu sp.) by three mealybug species. Plant Dis
Kubiriba J, Legg JP, Tushemereirwe W, Adipala E (2001) 92:11581163
Vector transmission of Banana streak virus in the Miiler JG, Daane KM, McElfresh JS, Moreira JA,
screen house in Uganda. Ann Appl Biol 139:3743 Malakar-Kuenen R, Guillen M, Bently WJ (2002)
La Notte P, Buzkan N, Choueiri E, Minafra A, Martelli GP Development and optimization of methods for using
(1997) Acquisition and transmission of grapevine sex pheromones for monitoring the mealybug
virus A by the mealybug Pseudococcus longispinus. Planococcus cus (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in
J Plant Pathol 78:7985 Californian vineyards. J Econ Entomol 95:706714
Le Maguet J, Beuve M, Herrbach E, Lemaire O (2012) Petty GJ, Tustin H (1993) Ant (Pheidole megacephala F.)-
Transmission of six ampeloviruses and two vitiviruses mealybug (Dysmicoccus brevipes Ckll.) relationships
130 R. Selvarajan et al.

in pineapples in South Africa. Acta Hortic cies of mealybug (Dysmicoccus spp.). Phytopathology
334:387395 88:12241230
Posnette AF, Robertson NF (1950) Virus diseases of cacao Sether DM, Melzer MJ, Busto J, Zee F, Hu JS (2005)
in West Africa. VI. Vector investigations. Ann Appl Diversity and mealybug transmissibility of ampelovi-
Biol 37:363377 ruses in pineapple. Plant Dis 89:450456
Raine J, McMullen RD, Forbes AR (1986) Transmission Su HJ (1998) First occurrence of Banana streak badnavi-
of the agent causing little cherry disease by the apple rus and studies on its vectorship in Taiwan. In: Banana
mealybug Phenacoccus aceris and the dodder Cuscuta streak virus: a unique virusMusa interaction?
lupuliformis. Can J Plant Pathol 8:611 Proceedings of the Workshop PROMUSA Virology
Rohrbach KG, Beardsley JW, German TL, Reimer NJ, Working Group, pp 2025
Sanford WG (1988) Mealybug wilt mealybugs and Thangavelu R, Selvarajan R, Singh HP (2000) Status of
ants on pineapple. Plant Dis 72:558565 banana streak virus and banana bract mosaic virus dis-
Roivainen O (1976) Transmission of cocoa viruses by eases in India. In: Singh HP, Chadha KL (eds) Banana:
mealy bugs (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). J Sci Agric improvement, production and utilization. Proceedings
Soc Finl 48:433453 of the conference on challenges for banana production
Rosciglione B, Castellano MA, Martelli GP, Savino V, and utilization in 21st century, AIPUB, NRCB, Trichy,
Cannizzaro G (1983) Mealybug transmission of grape- India, pp 364376
vine virus A. Vitis 22:331347 Tsai CW, Chau J, Fernandez L, Bosco D, Daane KM,
Selvarajan R, Balasubramanian V, Padmanaban B, Almeida RPP (2008) Transmission of Grapevine
Sathaimoorthy S (2006) Vector transmission of banana leafroll-associated virus 3 by the vine mealybug
bract mosaic and banana streak viruses in India. In: (Planococcus cus). Phytopathology 98:10931098
Proceeding of International symposium on Tsai CW, Rowhani A, Golino DA, Daane KM, Almeida
Management of vector-borne viruses held at RPP (2010) Mealybug transmission of grapevine lea-
ICRISAT, Hyderabad, 710 Feb 2006, p 110 froll viruses: an analysis of virusvector specicity.
Sether DM, Hu JS (1998) Corollary analyses of the pres- Phytopathology 100:830834
ence of pineapple mealybug wilt associatedvirus and Tsai CW, Daugherty MP, Almaida RPP (2012) Seasonal
the expression of mealybug wilt symptoms, growth dynamics and virus translation of grapevine leafroll-
reduction, and/or precocious owering of pineapple associated virus 3 in grapevine cultivars. Plant Pathol
(Abstr.). Phytopathology 88:80 61:977985
Sether DM, Hu JS (2002a) Closterovirus infection and Wakman W, Teakle D, Thomas JE, Dietzgen RG (1995)
mealybug exposure are necessary for the development Presence of clostero-like virus and a bacilliform virus
of mealybug wilt of pineapple disease. Phytopathology in pineapple plants in Queensland. Aust J Agric Res
92:928935 46:947958
Sether DM, Hu JS (2002b) Yield impact and spread of Watson GW, Kubiriba J (2005) Identication of mealy-
Pineapple mealybug wilt associated virus-2 and mealy- bugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on banana and
bug wilt of pineapple in Hawaii. Plant Dis 86:867874 plantain in Africa. Afr Entomol 13:3547
Sether DM, Ullman DE, Hu JS (1998) Transmission of
pineapple mealybug wilt-associated virus by two spe-
Economic Importance
11
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Mealybugs are widely distributed phytophagous discoloured welts on the rind of the fruit,
insects, often with broad host ranges. There are ower, etc.
approximately 2000 described mealybug species 2. Mealybugs excrete copious quantities of hon-
worldwide. According to Millar et al. (2002), 158 eydew, which is a substrate for the fungus,
species of mealybugs are recognized as pests. sooty mould. Sooty mould is black in colour
Mealybug is a pest, which can have a consider- and may stain the fruit/ower decreasing the
able negative economic impact on a wide range packout percentage as well as causing a delay
of crops and ornamentals. In the last 30 years, in fruit colour development. Photosynthetic
there have been several major outbreaks of potential, especially of young trees, may be
mealybugs causing alarming damage to crops, as negatively affected if sooty mould infection is
a result of invasion/accidental introductions. severe.
Losses and costs of controlling mealybugs in 3. Mealybug is a phytosanitary pest in some
Georgia (USA) in 1996 were estimated at about export markets (USA, Japan) and if found on
$9.8 million. Damage and costs of controlling the fruit/ower destined for these markets can
pink hibiscus mealybug in the United States were result in rejection of the consignment and
recently estimated at $700 million annually. In could place these important markets at risk for
South Africa, costs for control of vine mealybug the future.
in vineyards were estimated at around $100 per 4. Mealybugs act as vectors of plant virus dis-
hectare per season. Most notorious mealybug ease causing heavy losses. Several mealybugs
species are polyphagous, and have become seri- are responsible for transmission of Grapevine-
ous pests of different crops under different leafroll-associated virus (GLRaV), and the
environments. virus infection was predicted to spread with
Economic damage can happen in four ways: the economic impact of Grapevine-leafroll-
associated virus-3 (GLRaV-3) infection
1. A high population of mealybug can lead to exceeding 10,000 dollars per ha, annually in
fruit, ower/leaf drop, fruit/ower deforma- South Africa.
tion (high shoulders) and development of
Mealybugs spread between continents through
M. Mani (*) C. Shivaraju
international trade. In the United States, there are
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India 350 species of mealybugs. Approximately 70 %
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in of the 66 mealybug species that are considered as

Springer India 2016 131


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_11
132 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

pests are invasive. Invasive mealybugs in also known to transmit the virus known as cholo-
California are serious pests of several economi- rotic streak (Williams 2004). Birendracoccus
cally important crops. There are several other saccharifolii (Green) is a major pest of sugarcane
mealybugs that reveal the extent of damage and in India and a vector of spike disease (Ali 1962).
economic losses. In New Zealand, most of the Coccidohystrix insolita (Green) has been a seri-
known 114 species of mealybugs are found only ous pest of brinjal, egg plant/aubergine, in Bihar,
on native plants. Three cosmopolitan and inva- West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Kerala and several
sive Pseudococcus species are frequently occur- other states in India (Williams 2004). Economic
ring pests of horticultural crops in the country, damage by mealybugs on brinjal was reported in
where they account for more than 99 % of the Pakistan and also in other Asian countries (Arif
mealybug fauna in orchards and vineyards et al. 2009).
(Charles 1993). In France, scale insects, includ- Dysmicoccus boninsis (Kuwana) is a wide-
ing mealybugs, represent 31 % (Streito and spread pest of sugarcane causing economic dam-
Martinez 2005) of the newly introduced species age (Ben-Dov 1994). Dysmicoccus brevipes
in recent years, although all mealybug pests on (Cockerell) is a well-known pest of pineapples
grapevine are native (Sforza 2008). Likewise, in worldwide and also coffee. It acts as vector of
many countries, there were serious economic pineapple wilt in Hawaii and several other coun-
losses caused by mealybugs. tries. It is one of the principal pests of mango in
Rhodesgrass mealybug, Antonina graminis Okinawa. D. brevipes was reported on oilpalm-
(Maskell), has been a major pest of many pasture infesting leaves, inorescence and ripe fruit
grasses and lawns, and to some extent on bam- bunches in India (Ponnamma 1999). Dysmicoccus
boos in various parts of the world. It had com- neobrevipes (Beardsley) is common in Hawaii
pletely destroyed thousands of acres of good and also in southern Asia. It has caused severe
pasture land. Injury is rst indicated by the stunt- loss to tube rose growers in India. Dysmicoccus
ing and reduction in the overall size of individual grassii (Leonardi) has been reported as a pest of
grass clumps, with darkening of the leaves and banana in Canary Islands (Beardsley 1964a, b)
eventual death of the host plant. Death of seed- and heavy infestations on plantain in Nigeria.
ling plants is known to occur in about 3 weeks. Ehrhornia cupressi (Ehrhorn) is a serious pest,
Conventional control is difcult because of the which caused the destruction of cypress hedges
position of the mealybug on its host. The success in California (Herbert 1920).
in controlling this mealybug in Texas is by the Gilli mealybug Ferrisia gilli (Gullan) is the
introduction of the parasitoid Neodusmetia sang- primary pest of pistachio covering over 3000
wani (Subba Rao) from India (Dean et al. 1979). acres of pistachios in California. It is also known
The cost of the control programme was estimated to attack and cause huge losses to a wide range of
at that time at $0.2 million, resulting in the sav- crops such as almonds, grapes, stone fruits.
ings of about US$200 dollars per annum. The striped mealybug Ferrisia virgata
Subsequently, colonies of the parasitoid have (Cockrell) has been of some concern to several
been sent elsewhere in the New World. Heavy countries. In the past few years, however, heavy
infestations of the mealybug Antonina pretiosa infestations were noticed on many ornamental
(Ferris) produce unsightly condition of the bam- plants. This has caused some alarm as this spe-
boo (McKenzie 1967). Brevennia rehi (Lindinger) cies is reported as an important pest, especially to
is an important pest of rice in India, Pakistan, cotton. It is found normally above ground on the
Burma, Indonesia, Bangladesh and some other foliage where it causes the usual honeydew-sooty
countries causing severe loss of the crop espe- mould-type damage. During severe weather con-
cially in the dry seasons. Grains from mealybug- ditions, in Africa at least, it may move to the
infested plants did not develop properly and that crown and roots of its host. This mealybug is
they tasted bitter, and if present in normal food, found on a wide range of hosts. It caused eco-
they spoilt the avour after being cooked. It is nomic losses to citrus, guava, custard apple,
11 Economic Importance 133

mango, cotton, pomegranate, pummelo, tuberose, to 100 % loss in grapevine and mulberry. It is also
pepper, jackfruit, poinsettia, Acalypha, known to attack other crop plants, guava, pome-
Caesalpinia, etc. in India (Mani and granate, custard apple, acid lime, Phalsa, hibis-
Krishnamoorthy 1993), as well as pepper in India cus, ber, sapota, okra, etc. in different countries.
and jute in Bangladesh. Formicococcus robustus Introduced natural enemies, mainly the parasit-
(Ezzat and McConnell) is only known from the oid Anagyrus kamali (Moursi) (already known in
Indian region but it is sometimes intercepted at the Old World) and Gyranusoidea indica (Shafee,
port inspection elsewhere. Although a polypha- Alam and Agarwal) and the predator
gous species, it is frequently found on mango, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant), have
and in Pakistan it is reported as a serious pest. brought the mealybug under control in Egypt,
Kiritshenkella sacchari (Green) is known to West Indies, the United States, etc.
cause severe loss to sugarcane growers in India. Maconelicoccus hirsutus was detected in teak
Another example that indicates the high eco- plantations in 2004 in the Banderas valley in
nomic importance of a polyphagous mealybug is Mexico. A biological control programme was
the pink hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus initiated in May 2004 to release 210,000 of the
hirsutus (Green). This mealybug is indigenous to predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri on 150 ha of
southern Asia, and actually is considered a poten- land. Damage to trees was reduced by 92 % (Villa
tially serious pest in the United States, because of Castillo 2006). Mizococcus sacchari (Takshashi)
its extremely broad range of economically impor- was very injurious to sugarcane in Taiwan
tant hosts, including citrus, ornamentals, vegeta- (Takahashi 1928). Its presence in European and
bles and the native American ora. It was rst Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization
reported in the Western Hemisphere in Hawaii in (EPPO) countries would probably affect export
1984, and later in Grenada in 1994; subsequently markets, since it is regulated as a quarantine pest
it has spread rapidly through the Caribbean by many countries in other continents.
islands and to southern California (1999) and Nipaecoccus viridis (Maskell) is widespread
Florida (2002). Without control, the economic throughout tropics and subtropics causing eco-
impact of M. hirsutus to U.S. agriculture has nomic losses to numerous crop plants including
been estimated at $750 million per year (Hall citrus, pomegranate, guava, grapes, ber, jackfruit,
et al. 2008). The same pink hibiscus mealybug mango, custard apple and pummelo in several
was introduced accidentally to the Caribbean counties. In India, it is a pest of stored potatoes.
area in 199394, and has since spread beyond, Cotton is often attacked, when gall-like swellings
eventually reaching the United States. This dam- appear on terminal shoots, and tea is often heav-
aging species was rapidly identied by taxono- ily infested. On Artocarpus spp., large aggrega-
mists such as Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green); tions of the mealybug lead to drying of the shoots.
its biological control was described in detail by In South Africa, N. viridis is a major pest of cit-
Kairo et al. (2000), with discussion of the costs rus, and in Okinawa it is one of the principal pests
and benets. M. hirsutus is widely distributed of mango. When rst introduced into Jordan in
throughout southern Asia, Africa and other parts 1993, apparently without natural enemies, infes-
of the Old World including Australia. M. hirsutus tations sometimes resulted in total loss of the cit-
is reported as a vector of virus disease on cocoa rus crop. In Egypt, a severe outbreak of N. viridis
in Zanzibar and other plants in East Africa, which occurred on lebbak trees. Niapecoccus nipae
causes growth arrest and branch distortion (De (Makell) has become serious pest of avocado and
Lotto 1967). Maconellicoccus hirsutus gets guava in Hawaii (Zimmerman 1948) and Puerto
ranked as one of the most important polyphagous Rico (Martorell 1940). The species is now con-
mealybugs in southern Asia, especially in India trolled successfully in Hawaii by the parasitoid
still causing damage in parts of India (Mani et al. Pseudophycus uitilis (Timberlake). Nipaecoccus
2011). The pink hibiscus mealybug is a major nipae was also known to cause serious damage to
pest of grapevine in peninsular India causing up coconut in Bermuda (Bennet and Hughes 1959).
134 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Palmicultor palmarum (Ehrhorn) is reported calyxes of apple and pears grown for export has
to infest 5 % of coconut palms in Bangladesh and caused concern in Australia and New Zealand
India. The species attacks the spear leaves of oil (Ward 1966). Phenacoccus madeirensis (Green)
palm in India. It sometimes occurs deep in the is a common polyphagous mealybug in much of
brous material covering palm stems, where it is the New World, Africa and the Pacic region.
difcult for chemical insecticides to penetrate. This mealybug is injurious to potatoes (Solanum
Paracoccus marginatus (Williams and Granara tuberosum) in Peru, and the growth of associ-
de Willink) causes serious economic losses to the ated sooty moulds causes malformation and
tune of several crores of rupees to more than 90 damage to leaves of other plants in Japan,
plant species particularly to the papaya, tapioca where it has been reported recently. It has
and mulberry damage in more than 53 countries invaded India recently and found to be severe
including India. Paracoccus marginatus has on tapioca.
become a serious pest in the Caribbean islands, Phenacoccus manihoti (Matile-Ferrero)
where it attacks numerous plant species, espe- appeared on cassava in Africa in 1973, and soon
cially papaya. The mealybug has now reached the spread throughout the whole cassava belt. The
southern United States. The mealybug reached introduction of the parasitoid Apoanagyrus lopezi
Guam and Palau on C. papaya; these islands are (De Santis) from South America to Africa and
possible sources for future incursions into the the success of the biological control programme
Pacic area and southern Asia. Biological control against P. manihoti had been well documented by
of Pa. marginatus with Acerophagus papayae Herren and Neuenschwander (1991). The tre-
(Noyes and Schauff) saved the silk, papaya and mendous success is credited with preventing the
tapioca industry from the loss worth to 2000 malnutrition of millions of Africans and may
crores rupees in India alone (Mani and Shivaraju well be the most important example of classical
2012). Similar economic benets were realized biological control ever. Zeddies et al. (2001) cal-
in several other countries. Hatting (1993) reported culated the total costs and benets of this biologi-
Paracoccus burnerae (Brain) as the most impor- cal control programme for 27 African countries
tant pest on citrus in South Africa. over a 40-year period (19742013) under differ-
Phenacoccus aceris (Signoret) has become a ent scenarios, such as transport, loss of crop and
serious threat to apple, pear, plum and other fruit even the price of maize as a possible substitute.
trees in Miane, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Based on the total cost of biological control at
California and South Africa. The parasitoid US$ 47 million, the benets from different sce-
Allotropa utilis (Muesbeck) was introduced to narios range mainly from 199:1 (or US$ 9.4 bil-
British Columbia where it became well estab- lion) to 430:1 (or US$ 202 billion). Although the
lished. This was considered one of the outstand- initial cost of identication of the mealybug was
ing successes of classical biological control. negligible, there was a taxonomic advantage in
Phenacoccus gossypii (Townsend and Cockerell) that the costs included funds set aside for a study
is widely distributed in many countries. It is a of the mealybugs of Central and South America
pest of numerous owering plants in nurseries by Williams and Granara de Willink (1992).
and greenhouses, and in natural environments. Phenacoccus manihoti remains a threat to the
This mealybug, which is most often found on the cassava in the areas of southern Asia, as does the
foliage of its host, apparently causes as much yellow cassava mealybug, P. herreni, which still
damage to its host plants. Phenacoccus solani causes problems in South America. Reduction of
(Ferris) has probably been introduced recently P. herreni populations is under way, mainly
and is now established in southern Asia. There through the introduction of the parasitoids
are reports that it is a pest of stored potatoes in Apoanagyrus diversicomis (Howard) and
North America, and heavy infestations have been Acerophagus coccois (Smith) (Bento et al. 1999).
found on tobacco in Zimbabwe. Presence of The most trenchant point concerning the parthe-
Phenacoccus graminicola (Leonardi) under the nogenetic species P. manihoti is that an outbreak
11 Economic Importance 135

could occur in southern Asia with the accidental Planococcus citri (Risso) is one of the most
introduction of just a single immature specimen. cosmopolitan mealybugs. It is considered a seri-
Phenacoccus solani (Ferris) and Ph. solenop- ous pest of citrus in many parts of the world dam-
sis (Tinsley) are examples of invasive pests of aging many other eld crops in tropics and
annual crops; they cause heavy damage to green subtropics as well as greenhouse in temperate
pepper in Israel and cotton in the Indian subcon- regions. The mealybug is known to attack mainly
tinent (Ben-Dov 2005; Hodgson et al. 2008; subtropical fruit trees and also olive under
Nakahira and Arakawa 2006). The damage Mediterranean climate conditions and ornamen-
caused by mealybugs is linked to sap uptake, tal plants in interior landscapes in cooler zones
honeydew secretion and associated sooty mould (Ben-Dov 1994; Franco et al. 2004). The citrus
development, toxin injection and virus transmis- mealybug has become a key pest in the mint and
sion, although the presence of the insects may tarragon industry in Israel. This cosmopolitan
itself lead to economic losses (Franco et al. 2000; species was probably the rst recorded as pest in
McKenzie 1967; Panis 1969). The cotton mealy- southern Asia. Chemical control of this insect is
bug, Phenacoccus solenopsis, native of the amazingly difcult. Planococcus citri is known
United States (New Mexico) invaded several to cause up to 38 65 % damage on various citrus
countries Central America, the Caribbean and species (sweet orange, acid lime and lemon),
Ecuador (Argentina, Brazil, Ghana, Colombia, pummelo, guava, grapes (60 % loss), ber, sapota,
Nigeria, Asia (Pakistan, India and China)). It is a pomegranate, custard apple, crossandra, coffee,
major pest posing a severe threat to the cotton etc. in India (Manjunath 1986; Mani 2001).
crop in India and vegetable growing areas of Biological control of P. citri with natural enemies
Thailand and several ornamental plants in many saved several citrus orchards in India, the United
countries. This mealybug caused economic dam- States, Italy, Australia and South Africa.
age in India and Pakistan reducing the yields up Planococcus is also listed as a vector of Ceylon
to 450 %. Phenacoccus solenopsis caused a loss cocoa virus in Sri Lanka and also Grapevine virus
of several lakhs of rupees to cotton growers in (GVA). Planococcus cus (Signoret) is a pest of
India alone. Phenacoccus gossypii (Townsend grapevine in the Mediterranean region, South
and Cockerell) is widely distributed in many Africa, Pakistan, Argentina, Georgia and
countries. It is a pest of numerous owering California, causing heavy losses to grape grow-
plants in nurseries and greenhouses, and in natu- ers. It also transmits the grapevine leafroll virus.
ral environments. This mealybug, which is most Planococcus kenyae (Le Pelley) is popularly
often found on the foliage of its host, apparently known as coffee mealybug. It has caused heavy
causes as much damage to its host as the citrus losses to coffee growers in Uganda, Tanzania and
mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso). Heavy Kenya (Bigger 2009).
infestations of Ph. solani have been recorded on Planococcus lilacinus (Cockerell) is one of
tobacco in Zimbabwe. the most common in southern Asia and reports of
Phenacoccus saccharifolii (Green) is known damage vary. It is known to attack and cause seri-
to attack sugarcane in India, Nepal and Pakistan. ous economic losses to cocoa, guava, ber, citrus,
In Bihar (India), infestation causes leaves and black pepper, cashew, pomegranate, guava,
internodes to become drastically reduced so that sapota, coffee, chow chow, mango, etc. (Mani
the cane can resemble a spike. Young sugarcane 2001). Planococcus lilacinus is known to trans-
plants have been severely damaged by this spe- mit Ceylon cocoa virus in parts of Sri Lanka.
cies in West Bengal (India). Planococcoides Planococcus cus is a serious pest of grapevine
nijalensis (Laing) is the dominant vector of the in the Mediterranean region, South Africa,
cocoa swollen shoot virus in African countries. It Argentina, Georgia and Pakistan. It is also found
is also known to attack cashew, Annona, silk cot- transmitting GVA and grape leafroll virus (Ben-
ton, pineapple, Acacia, Albizia, Caesalpinia, Dov 1994; Daane et al. 2006; Zada et al. 2008).
Erythrina, coffee, Clerodendron, etc. Planococcus minor (Maskell) is a common
136 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

species on economically important plats particu- a pest in greenhouses and nurseries, but is also
larly cocoa throughout its geographical range. found out of doors in warmer areas. It has been
Trees (Cupressus and Juniferus) infested with reported as a pest of avocados, grapes and citrus.
Planococcus ovae (Nasonov) suffer from dieback Severe infestations have been reported on black
of twigs, heavy accumulation of honey dew and pepper in India. The mealybug is a target pest for
decline of trees in Italy (Ben-Dov 1994). classical biological control in Australia, and the
Planococcus kraunhiae (Kuwana) is widely species has caused damage to avocados in Israel
spread in California, Taiwan, China, Japan dam- in recent years. It also acts as a vector of grape
aging fruit tress such as pears, grapes, persim- leafroll virus. The orchid mealybug Pseudococcus
mons, banana, citrus, gs, etc. Planococcus microcirculus (McKenzie) has caused many
minor Maskell is a common species of many eco- problems to orchid growers (McKenzie 1967). It
nomically important plants including cocoa. is found primarily on the roots of its host but
Planococcus ovae (Nasanov) is widely distrib- crawls to the foliage and leaf sheaths when infes-
uted in Neotropical and Palaearctic regions on tations become heavy. The type of damage is the
Anthurium, Cupress and Juniperus trees. Infested normal form of unsightly contamination with the
trees suffer from dieback. production of honeydew during heavy infesta-
Several members of the genus Pseudococcus, tions. Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrhorn) is
for example, Ps. calceolariae (Maskell), Ps. lon- another species important primarily to grapes and
gispinus (Targioni-Tozzetti) and Ps. viburni pears in some countries. The presence of these
(Signoret), are important pests of apple, pear and mealybugs on the ripe marketed grapes results in
vineyards in New Zealand (Charles 1993), serious economic loss to the growers. Heavy
whereas around the Mediterranean they are con- infestations cause the grapes to crack, allowing
sidered mainly as pests of citrus, persimmon and mould contamination. Pseudococcus viburmi
several other subtropical fruits (Franco et al. (Signoret) is most common in tropical and tem-
2004). Pseudococcus comstocki (Kuwana) is a perate areas but it is not widespread in southern
serious pest on apple, mulberry, pears, peach in Asia. It may have been overlooked, however,
the United States and Japan. The citriculus owing to its cryptic habit of living on roots. In
mealybug, Pseudococcus cryptus (Hempel), is a Australia, it causes damage to lawns and tubers,
major pest of citrus in the east Mediterranean and is a target species there for classical biologi-
region, and it attacks coffee roots in Asia and cal control. It is causing damage to Californias
South America (Ben-Dov 1994; Williams and coastal vineyards.
Granara de Willink 1992). It is widespread and a Following the introduction of the cassava
polyphagous mealybug species and appears to be mealybug into Africa, another introduced mealy-
kept under control by natural enemies in southern bug Rastrococcus invadens (Williams) appeared
Asia. Citrus and coconut are its favourite host in West Africa in 198182, causing extensive
plants, and infestations are known to occur on oil damage to fruit trees including mango (Williams
palm in India. It is widely distributed in Southeast 1986b). This mealybug was already known from
Asia, Tropical Africa, Middle East Meditrranean India and Pakistan (Narasimham and Chako
and South America. It is particularly a pest of cit- 1988). Rastrococcus invadens is usually scarce in
rus in Israel and the pest was controlled with the parts of India because it is controlled by natural
introduction of Clausenia purpurea (Ishii). enemies. The introduction of the encyrtid
Pseudococcus fragilis (Brain) was rst found in Gyranusoidea tebyi (Noyes) from India to West
California and rapidly became a serious pest of Africa, and its swift control of the mealybug
citrus to the point that it threatened the industry; there, is hailed as another biological control suc-
it also became a serious pest in Abkhazia of cess (Neuenschwander et al. 1994). Rastrococcus
USSR. iceryoides (Green) is causing serious damage to
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Tozzetti) mango from India, and other fruit trees, and it is
is distributed worldwide. This mealybug is often also a pest of cotton. At present, it is distributed
11 Economic Importance 137

throughout India and eastwards to Thailand and bug, but it has caused signicant damage to orna-
Malaysia. It has also reached East Africa, where mental bougainvillea plants in Britain, ruining
there have been reports of damage in inland parts their aesthetic appearance and reducing their
of Tanzania and Malawi. Rastrococcus iceryoi- market value. Large mealybug populations cause
des is also known to cause serious damage to necrosis of the foliage, leaf loss, dieback and
Kapok trees in Tanganyika. Saccharicoccus sac- moulds grow on the excreted honeydew.
chari (Cockerell) is distributed wherever sugar- Mealybug is a pest, which can have a consider-
cane is grown, particularly Hawaii, Egypt, able negative economic impact on a wide range
Somalia, Costa Rica, etc. In southern Asia, it has of crops and ornamentals.
been rated as one of the most important mealy- There are some ground-inhabiting mealybug
bugs attacking sugarcane, which is the main species of undetermined economic importance
source of sugar and alcohol. It is also a possible belonging to the genus Rhizoecus and Geococcus.
vector of rice diseases in Cuba and India. Puto pilosellae (Sulc) is a pest of strawberries
Spilococcus mamillariae (Bouche) is a common (Kosztarab and Kozar 1988). These species are
pest of ornamental succulent plants. almost impossible to control. They are capable of
Trionymus radicicola (Morrison) caused causing serious economic damage to some crops,
severe damage to sugarcane in Cuba when areas namely alfalfa, strawberry, banana, pepper, cof-
of sugarcane dried out due to heavy population of fee, etc. Rhizoecus americanus (Hambleton) is
the mealybug on the roots. Trionymus townesi often a serious pest in Florida nurseries and
(Beardsley) is also known to attack rice and sor- recently it appeared in Italy, where it infests orna-
ghum. In the Philippines, infested upland rice mental plants. Paraputo leveri (Green) has been
crops have been reported to show depressed recorded as damaging roots and killing coffee
areas; plants in these areas were apparently plants in Papua New Guinea (Williams 1986a).
stunted and yellowish. Vryburgia rimariae Paraputo theaecola (Green) is found on tea roots,
(Tranfaglia) is a pest of economic importance in apparently in large numbers in North India. It is
greenhouses in Italy. also a severe pest on the roots of Taraktogenos
One of the most common groups of insects kurzii, a plant that produces a valuable oil.
attacking ornamental plants is mealybugs. There Paraputo banzigeri sp. lives on the roots causing
are about 275 species of mealybugs known to be the death of Dimopcarpus longan. Paraputo
present in the continental United States. leveri (Green) is already known from much of the
Mealybugs are prevalent pests in greenhouses tropical Pacic region and southern Asia. In
and interior plantscapes such as shopping malls, Papua New Guinea, it is found on the roots of
conservatories, hotels and ofce buildings. coffee, where it is protected under a layer of the
Mealybugs cost growers and retailers millions of fungus Diacanthodes philippinensis and eventu-
dollars per year in control and crop damage or ally kills the trees.
loss. Damage is caused by mealybugs feeding on Rhizoecus cocois (Williams) is a hypogeal
host tissues and injecting toxins or plant patho- species known from India, where it occurs on
gens into host plants. In addition, mealybugs coconuts, causing roots to dry up and young
secrete a waste product, honeydew, which is a plants to show loss of vigour. Rhizoecus dianthi
syrupy, sugary liquid that falls on the leaves, (Green) is a serious pest of African violets in
coating them with a shiny, sticky lm. Honeydew California (Snetsinger 1966) and a major pest of
serves as a medium for the growth of sooty mould greenhouse plants in Europe. Rhizoecus kondonis
fungus that reduces the plants photosynthetic (Kuwana) is one of the most widespread and eco-
abilities and ruins the plants appearance. Feeding nomically important subterranean mealybugs in
by mealybugs can cause premature leaf drop, die- California, where it is a pest of alfalfa, prune
back and may even kill plants if left unchecked. trees and strawberry plants and also caused
There is almost no information published on the severe damage to citrus in Japan. Rhizoecus
economic importance of bougainvillea mealy- amorphophalli (Betrem) was recorded from
138 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Trivandrum, Kerala (India), on the roots of ele- Some mealybug species may be manipulated
phant foot yam, Amorphophallus sp., ginger, as benecial insects in conservation biological
Dioscorea and rhizomes of Curcuma domestica control tactics. For example, the cupress mealy-
stored for seed purposes. Rhizoecus amorpho- bug, Planococcus vovae (Nasonov), which
phalli sucks the cell sap from the tubers, and occurs on cupress trees (Cupressus spp.) grown
severely infested deformed tubers of elephant in windbreaks, serves as an alternative host for
foot yam, taro, tannia nd no place in the market, natural enemies of mealybug pests in surround-
nor do they accept for cooking, causing economic ing citrus orchards and cocoa plantations (Cox
loss in India. 1989; Ho and Khoo 1997; Franco et al. 2004).
Rhizoecus americanus (Ferris) is a soft- Mealybugs have been also used as benecial
bodied, sucking insect that attacks the tips of insects in biological control of weeds. For exam-
roots. It is very common in Florida and other ple, Hypogeococcus pungens (Granara de
southern states. However, if shipped in plants, it Willink) was successfully introduced from
continues to thrive indoors and in greenhouses. Argentina into Queensland (Australia) for the
These creatures are dangerous to plants and are control of Harrisia cactus (Eriocereus martini)
often ignored as insignicant or misidentied as and related plants (Williams and Granara de
mycorrhiza. Willink 1992). In southern Asia, Trabutina ser-
Geococcus coffeae (Green) is found through- pentina (Green) is conned to Tamarix spp. in
out most of southern Asia, often killing plants in Pakistan and India. Heavy infestations of the
several counties, where it has been introduced. mealybug cause withering of the plant, and the
Heavy infestations of Geococcus johorensis mealybug has the potential for biological control
(Williams) in Malaysia cause the yellowing and of Tamarix wherever the plants have gained weed
early dieback of the leaves. Xenococcus acropy- status. The mealybug Hypogeococcus festerianus
gae (Williams) was found causing damage to the has been used to control Harrisia cactus, a major
roots of grapes in India. weed in central Queensland.
Several mealybug species are vectors of viral Mealybugs have also provided food for
diseases of various crops: banana, black pepper humans; the biblical manna, one of the food
(Bhat et al. 2003), cocoa (Dufour 1991), grapevine sources consumed by the Israelites during their
(Tsai et al. 2008), pineapple (Sether and Hu 2002), wandering in the wilderness of Sinai, is believed
rice (Abo and Sy 1998) and sugarcane (Lockhart to have been the honeydew excretion of the
et al. 1992). In such cases, mealybugs may be eco- manna mealybug Trabutina mannipara
nomic pests even at low densities. For example, (Hemprich and Ehrenberg) (Ben-Dov 2006;
several mealybug species are responsible for Miller and Kosztarab 1979).
GLRaV-3 transmission to grapevine, which has
been shown by the strong positive correlations
between mealybug numbers and infection levels in References
the following season. The virus infection was pre-
dicted to spread rapidly within the vineyard, with Abo ME, Sy AA (1998) Rice virus diseases: epidemiol-
ogy and management strategies. J Sustain Agric
50 % infection occurring in years 6, 8 and 11 for
11:113134
high, intermediate and low infection rates, respec- Ali SM (1962) Coccids affecting sugarcane in Bihar
tively. The economic impact of GLRaV-3 infec- (Coccidae: Hemiptera). Indian J Sugar Res Dev
tion in sensitive varieties exceeded $10,000 per ha 6:7275
Arif MI, Raq M, Ghaffar A (2009) Host plants of cotton
by years 7, 9 and 12, and protability was suf-
mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis): a new menace to
ciently affected to justify replanting by year 11 cotton agro ecosystem of Punjab, Pakistan. Int J Agric
(Walker et al. 2004). Transmission of pineapple Biol 11(2):163167
wilt by Dysmicoccus spp. and cocoa swollen shoot Beardsley JW (1964a) Notes on the pineapple mealybug
complex with descriptions of two new species
by Planococcoides njalensis (Laing) had resulted
(Homoptera, Pseudococcidae). Proc Hawaiian
in heavy crop loss in some countries. Entomol Soc 19:5568
11 Economic Importance 139

Beardsley JW (1964b) Notes on the pineapple mealybug Franco JC, Suma P, da Silva EB, Blumberg D, Mendel Z
complex, with descriptions of two new species (2004) Management strategies of mealybug pests of
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Proc Hawaiian citrus in Mediterranean countries. Phytoparasitica
Entomol Soc XIX(1):5568 32:507522
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- Hall DG, Roda A, Lapointe SL, Hibbard K (2008)
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Phenology of Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera:
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- Pseudococcidae) in Florida based on attraction of
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic adult males to pheromone traps. Fla Entomol
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686p 91:305310
Ben-Dov Y (2005) The solanum mealybug, Phenacoccus Hatting V (1993) Mealybugs and cottony cushion scale on
solani Ferris (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), citrus in South Africa. Citrus J 3:2022
extends its distribution range in the Mediterranean Herbert FB (1920) Cypress bark scale. Bull US Dep Agric
basin. Phytoparasitica 33:1516 Bureau Entomol Wash 838:122
Ben-Dov Y (2006) Scales in a family/genus query. Herren HR, Neuenschwander P (1991) Biological control
Available at http://www.sel.barc.usda.gov/scalecgi/ of cassava pests in Africa. Annu Rev Entomol
chklist.exe? Family=Pseudococcidae&genus. 36:257283
Accessed 14 Aug 2008 Ho CT, Khoo KC (1997) Partners in biological control of
Bennet FD, Hughes IW (1959) Biological control of cocoa pests: Mutualism between Dolichoderus tho-
insect pests in Bermuda. Bull Entomol Res racicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and
50:423436 Cataenococcus hispidus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae).
Bento JMS, de Moraes GJ, Bellotti AC, Castillo JA, Bull Entomol Res 87:461470
Warumby JF, Lapointe SL (1999) Introduction of par- Hodgson C, Abbas G, Arif MJ, Saeed S, Krar H (2008)
asitoids for the control of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Sternorrhyncha:
Phenacoccus herreni (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), an invasive mealybug
north-eastern Brazil. Bull Entomol Res damaging cotton in Pakistan and India, with a discus-
89(5):403410 sion on seasonal morphological variation. Zootaxa
Bhat AI, Devasahayam S, Sarma YR, Pant RP (2003) 1913:135
Association of a badnavirus in black pepper (Piper Kairo MTK, Pollard GV, Peterkin DD, Lopez VF (2000)
nigrum L.) transmitted by mealybug (Ferrisia virgata) Biological control of the hibiscus mealybug,
in India. Curr Sci 84(12):15471550 Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green (Hemiptera:
Bigger M (2009) A geographical distribution list of insects Pseudococcidae) in the Caribbean. Integr Pest Manag
and mites associated with coffee derived from litera- Rev 5:241254
ture published before 2010. Available at www.ipmnet- Kosztarab M, Kozar M (1988) Scale insects of Central
work.net/commodity/coffee_insects.pdf. Accessed 16 Europe. Akdeiai Kiado, Budapest, 456 p
July 2013 Lockhart BEL, Autrey LJC, Comstock JC (1992) Partial
Charles JG (1993) A survey of mealybugs and their natu- purication and serology of Sugarcane mild mosaic
ral enemies in horticultural crops in North Island, New virus, a mealybug-transmitted closterolike virus.
Zealand, with implications for biological control. Phytopathology 82:691695
Biocontrol Sci Tech 3:405418 Mani M (2001) Biological control of fruit crops. In:
Cox J (1989) The mealybug genus Planococcus Reddy PP, Verghese A, Krishna Kumar NK (eds)
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Integrated pest management in horticultural ecosys-
(Entomol) 58:178 tems. Capital Publishsing Company, New Delhi,
Daane KM, Bentley WJ, Walton VM, Malakar-Kuenen R, pp 93107
Millar JG, Ingels CA, Weber EA, Gispert C (2006) Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1993) Bionomics and man-
New controls investigated for vine mealybug. Calif agement of the striped mealybug, Ferrisia virgata
Agric 60:3138 (Ckll.) A world review. Agric Rev 14:2243
De Lotto G (1967) A contribution to the knowledge of the Mani M, Shivaraju C (2012) Invasive papaya mealybug,
African Coccoidea, Homoptera. J Entomol Soc South Paracoccus marginatus and its biological control an
Afr 29:109120 overview. J Biol Control 26(3):201216
Dean HA, Schuster MF, Boling JC, Riherd PT (1979) Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A, Shivraju C (2011) Biological
Complete biological control of Antonina graminis in suppression of major mealybug species on horticul-
Texas with Neodusmetia sangwami (a classic exam- tural crops. J Hortic Sci 6(2):85100
ple). Bull Entomol Soc Am 25:262267 Manjunath TM (1986) Recent outbreaks of mealybugs
Dufour B (1991) Place and importance of different insect and their biological control. In: Jayaraj S (ed)
species in the ecology of Cssv (Cocoa swollen shoot Resurgence of sucking pests. Proceedings of national
virus) in Togo. Caf Cacao Th 35:197204 symposium, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University,
Franco JC, Silva EB, Carvalho JP (2000) Mealybugs Coimbatore, pp 249253
(Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae) associated with citrus in Martorell LF (1940) Some notes on forest entomology.
Portugal. ISA Press, Lisbon (in Portuguese) Carib For 1:2324
140 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

McKenzie HL (1967) Mealybugs of California with tax- Streito JC, Martinez M (2005) Nouveaux ravageurs, 41
onomy, biology and control of North American spe- espces depuis 2000. Phytoma La Dfense des vg-
cies (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae). taux 586:1620
University of California Press, Berkeley, 534 p Takahashi R (1928) Coccidae of Formosa. Philipp J Sci
Millar JG, Daane KM, McElfresh JS, Moreira JA, 36:327347
Malakar-Kuenen R, Guillen M, Bentley WJ (2002) Tsai C, Chan J, Fernandez L, Bosco D, Daane KM,
Development and optimization of methods for using Rodrigo RP (2008) Transmission of grapevine leaf
sex pheromone for monitoring the mealybug roll-associated virus 3 by the vine mealybug
Planococcus cus (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in (Planococcus cus). Phytopathology 98:S159
California vineyards. J Econ Entomol 95:706714 Villa Castillo J (2006) The use of biological control to
Miller DC, Kosztarab M (1979) Recent advances in the control forest pests in Mexico. [Spanish] El uso de
study of scale insects. Annu Rev Entomol 24:127 control biologico para el control de plagas forestales
Nakahira K, Arakawa R (2006) Development and repro- en Mexico. Forestal XXI 8:1112
duction of an exotic pest mealybug, Phenacoccus Walker JTS, Charles JG, Froud KJ, Connolly P (2004)
solani (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) at three constant Leafroll virus in vineyards: modelling the spread and
temperatures. Appl Entomol Zool 41:573575 economic impact. Horticulture and Food Research
Narasimham AU, Chako MJ (1988) Rastrococcus spp. Institute of New Zealand Ltd, Mt Albert
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and their natural ene- Ward A (1966) Mealybugs (Hemiptera: pesudococcidae).
mies in India as potential biocontrol agents for R. Acta Entomol Sin 28:444446
invadens Williams. Bull Entomol Res 78:703708 Williams DJ (1986a) Scale insects (Hmoptera: coccoidea)
Neuenschwander P, Boavida C, Bokonon-Ganta Gado A, on coffee in Papua New Guinea. Papua New Guinea.
Herren HR (1994) Establishment and spread of J Agric For Fish 34:17
Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes and Anagyrus mangicola Williams DJ (1986b) Rastrococcus invadens sp. n.
Noyes (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), two biological (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) introduced from the orien-
control agents released against the mango mealybug tal region to West Africa and causing damage to mango,
Rastrococcus invadens (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) citrus and other trees. Bull Entomol Res 76:695699
in Africa. Biocontrol Sci Technol 4:6169 Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Panis A (1969) Observations faunistiques et biologiques Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
sur quelques Pseudococcidae (Homoptera, Coccoidea) London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
vivant dans le midi de la France. Ann Zool Ecol Anim Williams DJ, Granara de Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs
1:211244 of Central and South America. CAB International,
Ponnamma KN (1999) Coccoids associated with oil palm Wallingford, 635 p
in India a review. The Planter 75(882):445451 Zada A, Dunkelblum E, Assael FJC, Silva EB, Protasov
Sether DM, Hu JS (2002) Closterovirus infection and A, Mendel Z (2008) Attraction of Planococcus cus
mealybug exposure are necessary for the development males to racemic and chiral pheromone baits: ight
of mealybug wilt of pineapple disease. Phytopathology activity and bait longevity. J Appl Entomol
92:928935 132:480489
Sforza R (2008) Les cochenilles sur la vigne. In: Les rava- Zeddies J, Schaab RP, Neuenschwander P, Herren HR
geurs de la vigne. Eds Feret, Bordeaux, pp 188210 (2001) Economics of biological control of cassava
Snetsinger R (1966) Biology and control of root feed- mealybugs in Africa. Agric Econ 24:209219
ing mealybugs on Saintpaulia. J Econ Entomol Zimmerman EC (1948) Homoptera: Sternorrhyncha.
59:10771078 Insect Hawaii 5:1464
Ecology
12
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

12.1 Macro-environmental this, for its only restriction is the distribution of


Preferences its host, Artemisia (Compositae). It is found in
high mountains at altitudes of 10,000 ft to low
Mealybugs are much more numerous than might coastal regions of 30 ft. It is also commonly
be expected. Most people know of them as com- found in dry chaparral areas.
mon garden and nursery pests, but few realize the
enormous native fauna which exist. Mealybugs
are found in areas ranging from the low moist 12.2 Microenvironmental
coastal regions to the high snow-covered areas. Preferences
They are found from elevations of 200 ft to alti-
tudes of over 12,000 ft above mean sea level. Do mealybugs show the wide diversity of host
They are found in salt marshes and hot, dry desert plants. The general groups of plants infested
sands. In these different environments, certain are perennial and annual owering plants
types of mealybugs are found more frequently (angiosperms), grasses, conifers and some
than others. In the very high altitude regions, ferns.
conifer- and perennial-inhabiting Puto and grass
sheath-infesting Trionymus are most likely to be
found. In the moist coastal regions, root- and 12.2.1 Perennial Flowering Plants
soil-inhabiting Rhizoecus and grass-infested
Trionymus are common. In the dry, arid deserts, Mealybugs are most commonly found in peren-
foliage- and root-inhabiting Phenacoccus and nial plants. In some regions, every possible niche
Spilococcus are numerous. These regions are not is utilized on the perennial hosts. In one instance,
restricted to the genera mentioned above, nor are in San Diego County, an Artemisia plant was
the genera restricted to just these regions infested with Rhizoecus gracilis McKenzie on
(McKenzie 1967). the roots, Phenacoccus antemisiae Ehrhorn on
There are some mealybugs which have no par- the crown, Spilococcus corticosus McKenzie
ticular environmental preference. Amonosterium under the bark and Amonostherium lichtensioides
lichtensioides (Cockerell) is a good example of (Cockerell) on the foliage. Perennial foliage-
infesting mealybugs, although common in the
M. Mani (*) C. Shivaraju eld, are predominately noticed in greenhouses
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, and backyard gardens. On foliage and stems,
Bangalore 560089, India mealybugs apparently prefer tight, enclosed
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 141


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_12
142 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

areas, for they are normally found in the leaf or yuccae (Coquillett) or Puto decorosus McKenzie
stem axils. Infestations on fruits are usually usually just cling to the bark in any way possible.
enclosed in the calyx area. On the foliage, mealy- Mealybugs of the Phenacoccus type may also be
bugs such as Planococcus citri (Risso), found encysted in the centre of the trunk of the
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni-Tozzetti) perennial plant itself. Perhaps these pseudococ-
and P. obscures Essig are common. cids gain entrance into this area through cracks in
Stems and twigs of perennials are also good the bark, but they appear to be completely
areas for mealybug colonies. Normally, the enclosed by the plant tissue. Phenacoccus arte-
mealybugs are found wedged into the cracks and misiae Ehrhorn is an example of this type of
crevices of the bark, again showing a preference mealybug.
for tight areas. Stems and twigs of plants are not Very often, the plant parts, both above and
nearly as important as roots, crowns and leaf below the ground, are utilized by certain boring
axils, but mealybugs such as Spilococcus eriogoni insect larvae. Commonly, if these boring tunnels
(Ehrhorn), Phenacoccus delectus Ferris and P. are pulled open, heavy infestations of certain spe-
alleni McKenzie are occasionally found restricted cies of mealybugs will be discovered.
to the branches. Most often, branches are an Phenacoccus eremicus Ferris seems to depend
overow area from the heavily infested leaf axils. upon the cerambycid boring tunnels for its total
The habitat of the mealybugs may be divided existence during detrimental weather. When
into two parts: the part which is above the ground snow is on the ground or temperatures are consis-
(arboreal) and that which is below the ground tently above 100 F, these mealybugs are found
(hypogeal). Very heavy infestations often occur only in the cerambycid tunnels. Apparently, the
below the ground. Frequently, this area becomes tunnels are an ideal setting for this pseudococcid,
so heavily contaminated with mealybugs that for the empty cavities surrounding the beetle
they often overow onto the roots. It should be larva are quite often completely full of mealy-
noted that only very rarely does this overow of bugs in all stages of development. During more
soil-inhabiting mealybugs move to the plant parts favourable weather conditions, infestations out-
above the soil surface. Many species of mealy- side of the tunnels are quite common.
bugs are entirely restricted to the root region.
These mealybugs can be divided into two types:
those that inhabit the main, large roots, and those 12.2.2 Annual Flowering Plants
that restrict themselves to the small eshy roots.
Cracks and crevices are the common areas of Mealybugs infesting annual plants are unique in
infestation on the main roots, but on the eshy that their host is present for only a small part of
roots, infestations may occur in any area where the year. The location of these mealybugs during
there is a vacant space. Species commonly col- that part of the year when their host plant is
lected in the large root areas are Phenacoccus absent is still a question. This is still a mystery.
solani Ferris, P. artemisiae Ehrhorn, For example, a very heavy infestation of
Chorizococcus polyporus McKenzie, Puto paci- Phenacoccus eschscholtziae McKenzie was
cus McKenzie, Chnaurococcus trifolii (Forbes) found in early April on a large variety of annual
and many more. Species found in the second hosts. But no mealybugs were found on plant
group are usually representatives of the genus parts either above or below the ground after 2
Rhizoecus, with R. falcifer Kunckel d'Herculais, months. Probably the annual-infesting mealy-
R. gracilis McKenzie and R. kondonis Kuwana as bugs, the disappearance of the pseudococcid with
good examples. its host, are still a mystery. Infestations on annual
Infestations of moderate- to small-sized hosts are localized in the subterranean areas, and
mealybugs usually occur in cracks and crevices there are mealybugs that are commonly found on
on the bark, whereas large species such as Puto the foliage of such hosts.
12 Ecology 143

12.2.3 Grasses roots or the foliage of the conifer are the areas of
early development and the bark is merely a rest-
Mealybugs are found on grasses in three areas: ing place for later development where no feeding
the foliage, crowns and roots. Most of the mealy- occurs. In the case of Puto sandini Washburn,
bugs inhabit the leaf-blade sheath of the grass which infests Engelmann spruce, Picea engel-
plant. This type of pseudococcid is especially mannii, in Utah, at elevations of 10,00011,200
adapted to its habitat in that it is dorsoventrally ft, this mealybug goes through a very compli-
attened, allowing it to t comfortably in its cated 4-year life cycle involving annual multiple
sheath environment. Trionymus is the most com- migrations. As a demonstration of the complexity
mon genus of this type, with T. dolus Ferris, T. of the life cycle, here is what happens during the
smithii (Essig) and T. festucae (Kuwana) being rst year. The mature adult females produce the
good examples. Mealybugs are found on the leaf rst-instar nymphs under the bark chips on the
surfaces of the Gramineae. Again, Trionymus is a bole of the tree. These nymphs migrate from the
good example of this type of infestation. Some bole to the duff at the base of the tree in late
mealybugs are found in the crown regions of September where they remain under the snow
Gramineae, for example, Discococcus spp. Some until sometime in May. At this time, they migrate
mealybugs are found at the nodes of the grass back up the tree to the foliage where they feed
stems, for example, Antonina graminis (Maskell). until mid-July. At this time, they migrate back
Some of these mealybugs feed on the tender ter- down the bole and hide in the bark crevices. In
minal roots of the grass, where they are exposed September, many specimens go back to the foli-
to the surrounding soil with little or no waxy pro- age again where they feed intermittently until late
tection. Cryptoripersia, on the other hand, occurs September. They then move down to the ground,
in the same area on the roots, but is covered by a crawl into the duff where they remain until the
tough, felted sac. Another root area is inhabited following May. This type of migration seems fea-
by Discococcus spectabilis McKenzie. The sible for other conifer-infesting Puto because in
mature adult females of this mealybug form their some California species there are known records
ovisac at the base of the plant just a few millime- of infestations in the duff, on the bark and in the
tres below where the roots were rst produced foliage.
from the culm base. Areas other than the bark of conifers are also
infested. The foliage region is particularly well
inhabited. In most instances, the mealybugs are
12.2.4 Conifers found at the bases of the needles. As far as is
known, the total life cycle of these species is
The genus Puto contains several species which spent in the region of the foliage. Some species
inhabit various types of conifers. Most of them found in the foliage area are Crisicoccus pini
have been found only in the cracks in the bark or (Kuwana), Dysmicoccus pinicolus McKenzie, D.
under the rocks and fallen logs. This host posi- ryani (Coquillett), Ehrhornia cupressi (Ehrhorn),
tion is quite extraordinary because it would seem Puto cupressi (Coleman) and Spilcoccus implica-
virtually impossible for the mealybugs to gain tus Ferris. Root infestations in coniferous trees
any nourishment from such inanimate objects. are not common.
Some of these pseudococcids have been found on Fern-inhabiting mealybugs are not at all
the bark at the base of the trunks of redwood trees common. Rhizoecus pritchardi McKenzie is,
well over 150 ft tall. The bark in this area would however, a species which is often found on
undoubtedly be over ten times thicker than the the roots of maidenhair fern, and is perhaps
length of the mealybug stylets. more commonly associated with the roots of
Perhaps these late-instar nymphs were able to African violet. Several other mealybugs are
sustain themselves completely on nutrients gath- also found on, although not restricted to, vari-
ered in the early parts of their life history. The ous types of ferns in nurseries. Perhaps the
144 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

most common species in this category is cially temperature and relative humidity (RH),
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni- are major ecological factors that have been found
Tozzetti). Several species of Pedronia are to severely affect mealybugs and their natural
restricted to ferns in Hawaii. enemies.

12.2.5 Inanimate Objects 12.4.1 Overwintering

Occasionally, mealybugs are found in association Temperature is the driving force for mealybug
with nonbiological objects, especially during development. Many mealybugs overwinter as
winter. Misericoccus arenarius (Done and second-instar nymphs, although adult females,
Steinweden) is often found under the rocks or rst-instar nymphs and eggs also can full this
cracks in the rocks during the winter period. function (Miller 2005). For example,
Phenacoccus colemani Ehrhorn is commonly Phenacoccus azaleae Kuwana overwinters as a
found in the pits and crevices under the lava rocks. second-instar nymph within a wax cocoon (Xie
Heliococcus stachyos (Ehrhorn) is found under et al. 1999), Planococcus vovae as rst and sec-
the rocks deeply embedded in cracks in the rocks. ond instars (Francardi and Covassi 1992),
Wooden boards also serve as the habitat of some Pseudococcus viburni as rst instar in bark crev-
mealybugs. Chorizococcus rostellum (Hoke) is ices, and rarely as second or third instars
commonly found under the wooden boards. (Kosztarab 1996), and Pseudococcus maritimus
(Ehrhorn) as eggs and rst instar under the bark
(Geiger and Daane 2001). Ps. maritimus and Pl.
12.3 Host Plant Position cus overwinter primarily under the bark of the
trunk and cordon, with some of the population
Mealybugs show preference to certain positions found underground on the roots.
within the plant. Development of mealybug pop- The temperature has an impact on the devel-
ulation can be related to the plant growth and opment times and temperature thresholds for dif-
development. The mealybugs are relatively abun- ferent species. The number of generations of the
dant more on the fruits than on the other plant mealybug varies with the species, locality and
parts. This is true in several fruit crops. Mealybugs climatic factors. Most mealybug species are uni-
are found under loose bark and also on aerial or bivoltine, although some are reported to have
roots in the case of grapevine when fruit bunches as many as eight generations per annum in green-
are not available. Congregation of mealybugs is houses. There are ten generations of Planococcus
observed in the nodal region of the stem. They minor in a year, eight during FebruaryNovember
are seen usually on the lower surface of the and two during NovemberJanuary; M. hirsutus
leaves, more near the veins in the leaf. Mealybugs had ten generations per year in India. For exam-
are seen in large numbers on the fruits and are ple, Pseudococcus maritimus will have two gen-
rarely seen on the leaves and trunk in the case of erations in Californias interior valleys, whereas
custard apple. In ornamentals, the mealybugs are Planococcus cus can have seven generations in
distributed on the leaves, terminal shoots and the same region but is reported to have only three
ower buds. Some arboreal mealybugs extend generations per year in Italy. Similarly, Pl. citri in
their feeding on the parts just below the soil. Brazil has six generations per year in the south,
but up to 11 per year in the northeast where
grapes are produced throughout the year (two
12.4 Seasonal Development harvests per season). Other than Ps. maritimus
and H. bohemicus, there does not appear to be
Abiotic and biotic factors play a major role in the winter dormancy for the mealybugs. There is also
seasonal development of mealybugs besides the a variation in the seasonal feeding location and
phenology of the crop. Weather conditions, espe- movement on the plant among and within spe-
12 Ecology 145

cies, depending on factors such as regional tem- were registered at intervals of 2 h for 24 h on two
peratures and vineyard management practices, as separate days in July and September, respec-
described for Ps. maritimus and Pl. cus. The tively. In both the months, there was a high peak
mealybug population overwinters primarily of activity at sunset and a lower one at sunrise; in
under the bark of the trunk and cordon, with July, the peaks were separated by many hours of
some of the population found underground on the low catches, whereas in September the morning
roots, especially when tended by ants. There is no peak was much higher and the morning and eve-
diapause. On warm days, development may occur ning peaks were somewhat closer together than
during the winter months, with completion of the in July, owing to the shorter day length.
rst generation almost entirely under the bark. In tropical countries, the mealybugs occur on
From spring to summer, the Pl. cus population the plants throughout the year. Development of
follows the movement of plant resources from mealybug population can be related to the plant
roots to shoots to leaves. Four to ve generations growth and development. The mealybugs will be
are completed and population density can relatively abundant more on the fruits than on the
increase rapidly, although high summer tempera- other plant parts. The population is low in winter
tures, in excess of 40 C, may slow the growth of and rainy seasons and higher in summer months.
the population and increase mortality. As berries There was a highly signicant positive correla-
ripen and sugars develop, mealybugs move into tion of maximum and minimum temperature and
the berry clusters, rst attacking those near the a highly signicant negative correlation of morn-
vine cordon. The rapid population increase in ing and evening relative humidity and a nonsig-
summer is followed by an equally rapid decline nicant negative correlation of rainfall with
after harvest, resulting from biological controls mealybug population in vineyards in South India.
and abiotic mortality associated with high tem- They manage to survive under loose bark, feed-
peratures and vine senescence. ing at bases of spurs and callus tissue at the site of
The optimal temperature for populations of girdles in the off-season. In the absence of rains,
the cassava mealybug is between 20 and 30 there is a sudden spurt in the mealybug popula-
C. The cassava mealybug has poor survivability tion in dry seasons. Females of the mealybug
during rainy season because it is washed off the Glycycnyza turangicola are enclosed in a capsule
plant and drowns. The preferred temperature formed by hardened honeydew. This specializa-
range for the vineyard mealybug Planococcus tion is regarded as an adaptation to desert condi-
vitis (Nied.) was 1634 C, and this preference tions where humidity is extremely low in the
was unaffected by relative humidity. Linear Amudarya plain.
velocity increased with rises in the temperature. Heavy sporadic rains and cool temperatures of
Individuals that had been preconditioned at 95 % less than 20 C result in the temporary reduction
RH showed no consistent preference when pro- in the mealybug population. The pest population
vided with a choice of relative humidities, but build-up coincides with a high temperature of
those that had been desiccated avoided low 3040 C, low humidity (less than 40 %) and
humidities. The degree of humidity is probably fruit development.
perceived over the whole body. The mealybug is There is also a variation in the seasonal feed-
photonegative, and the reduced compound eyes ing location and movement on the vine among
are probably the photoreceptors. A rough sub- species and within species depending on regional
stratum was generally preferred to a smooth one. temperatures and vineyard management
Temperature appeared to be the main factor practices. There is no diapause, and slow devel-
determining the behaviour of the adults, and ori- opment may occur during the winter months
entation in relation to temperature, light, humid- under South Indian conditions. M. hirsutus was
ity and contact is mainly achieved by klinokinesis, active during winter also, without hibernation but
klinotaxis and orthokinesis. Catches of the male was most active during MarchOctober on roselle
mealybug, Pseudococcus calceolariae (Mask.), around West Bengal. In North India, the mealy-
146 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

bug M. hirsutus on mesta overwintered in over- The ensete root mealybug Cataenococcus
lapping stages in the capsules of mesta beneath ensete Williams and Matile-Ferrero is a major
the persistent calyx and epicalyx of the old and pest in the ensete-growing regions of southern
dried plants and also in the soil during December Ethiopia. The ensete root mealybug, was
and January, when food plants were not avail- observed between 1054 and 2977 meter above
able. Mealybugs developed from a fraction of sea level (masl). Its infestation was severe only
third-generation eggs that did not enter winter between 1400 and 2200 masl. The highest infes-
diapause. tation (53.6 %) was recorded between 1600 and
Water-stressed plants have been reported to 1800 masl (Addis et al. 2010).
favour the increase in the mealybug population.
High nitrogen application enhances the results in
increase in the population of mealybugs. 12.4.2 Dispersal
In Java, Ferrisia virgata appears in large num-
bers during dry seasons of the year. It is more Adult male mealybugs are winged. The rst-
abundant from February to May in Philippines. instar nymphs (crawlers) have been found to
In Saudi Arabia, three generations were observed possess numerous characteristics that have been
in a year, early June, early July and August, and considered adaptations for dispersal behaviour,
the population increased with each generation. It including long legs and antennae (Gullan and
overwintered between January and early June as Kosztarab 1997). Adult males and newly
an adult female in the cracks and crevices of emerged rst-instar nymphs of most mealybug
trunks and branches and also on the fallen leaves. species display dispersal actively. Most mealy-
The female mealybug also migrated to the soil in bugs remain relatively stationary throughout
winter. The peak activity of F. virgata was their life (Miller 2005). However, some species
observed during JuneSeptember in West Bengal. move to different areas of the host for overwin-
On a number of host plants, it was most active tering, feeding, mating, ovipositing and moult-
during AugustNovember and MarchApril but ing (Franco 1994; McKenzie 1967; Miller 2005).
was very much reduced during December The occurrence of seasonal movements within
January (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 1993). the host has been reported for various mealybug
Several environmental factors inuence the pop- species, especially those associated with woody
ulation of F. virgata. Numerous records refer to plants such as Pl. citri, Ps. calceolariae, Ps.
heavy attack by F. virgata after prolonged viburni and Ps. longispinus in citrus (Franco
drought. The mealybug is favoured by dry 1994; Nestel et al. 1995); Pl. cus and Ps. mari-
weather in Java. The most important factor was timus in grapevine (Geiger and Daane 2001;
atmospheric humidity which exercises an indi- Godfrey et al. 2003); Pl. vovae in Juniperus spp.
rect effect through its inuence on parasitic fungi. (Francardi and Covassi 1992) and Ph. azaleae in
Temperature did not appear to have much effect bunge prickly ash (Xie et al. 1999). Franco
on F. virgata in Java. But a signicant positive (1994) suggested that immature feeding stages
correlation was found between the population of mealybugs on citrus tend to search for and to
density and daily maximum and minimum tem- settle at the major sinks, for example, growing
peratures in Saudi Arabia. Wind inuences the fruits, of the host plant in each phenological
dispersal and establishment of F. virgata in addi- period. We believe this hypothesis may also
tion by walking of the mealybugs. Windy areas explain the migratory movements of other
are highly susceptible to attack which is more mealybug species within various hosts. For
severe on hill tops than in valleys. F. virgata example, Pl. kraunhiae Kuwana was reported to
attacks the weak plants easily and spreads quickly feed on bacterium galls because they are sinks
on the younger plants exposed to sun and pro- for assimilates and have more nutritious phloem
tected from wind. It appears to prefer below sap and parenchyma than do normal plant tissues
5,000 ft altitude. (Yamazaki and Sugiura 2005). Other nymphal
12 Ecology 147

stages and adult female mealybugs are wingless, wild animals may aid the passive dispersal of
and some even legless; hence, they are not highly mealybugs (Kosztarab and Kozr 1988).
vagile, often xed to plants by their mouthparts Transport of nursery plants (ornamentals and
and always have a restricted distribution. fruit plants) infested with mealybugs aids the
However, the cassava mealybug (Phenacoccus spread of mealybugs from one location to
manihoti), rst reported in 1973 from the Congo another location.
areas of Kinshasa and Brazzaville, had become Among arthropods, ants have also been
established throughout the whole cassava belt of reported to disperse many mealybug species
Africa as far south as Mozambique by 1986 on (Gullan and Kosztarab 1997; Malsch et al. 2001;
the single plant genus Manihot (Herren and Ranjan 2006). Ants transported mealybugs from
Neuenschwander 1991). Mealybugs, particu- plant to plant between and within elds, thus
larly crawlers, having legs move limited dis- facilitating mealybug dispersal; adult females
tances within the plant and also between the and immatures of some mealybug species, asso-
plants (Kosztarab and Kozr 1988). Nevertheless, ciated with the ant genus Acropyga Roger, are
if conditions are favourable, crawlers usually carried by queens in their mandibles when found-
settle on the natal host plant, often close to their ing new colonies (Williams 1998). Associations
mother, which leads to an aggregative distribu- among invasive species of ants and mealybugs
tion (Gullan and Kosztarab 1997; Nestel et al. can be important in their success in new locations
1995). Similarly to most scale insects, crawlers (Helms and Vinson 2002). It is also observed that
are the mealybugs main dispersal agents, even mealybugs and other scale insects cling to locusts
though the mortality is very high (Gullan and during swarming. Misra (1920) reported another
Kosztarab 1997). First-instar mealybugs are eas- phoretic method of eggs and nymphs of
ily transported by the wind (Gullan and Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) being trans-
Kosztarab 1997). However, Williams and ported by nymphs and adult females of another
Granara de Willink (1992) reported that mealy- mealybug Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell).
bugs were believed to be distributed by air cur- All these methods are responsible for the local
rents over only short distances. In addition, and short-distance dispersal. Long-range disper-
dispersal strategies may be more passive, and sal of mealybugs is usually accomplished by the
crawlers of several species have been found to transport of infested plant material. Many species
exhibit behaviours that increase the chances of of mealybugs have been widely distributed by
wind dispersal and to use wind dispersal to commercial trafc, mostly carried on imported
migrate for several kilometres (Washburn and plant material (Williams and Granara de Willink
Washburn 1984). In India, Paracoccus margin- 1992). Papaya mealybug Paracoccus marginatus
atus spread very fast by wind dispersal of crawl- had spread very fast through the transport of
ers from the state Tamil Nadu to other states. fruits infested with mealybugs from Tamil Nadu
Crawlers from several species have also been to other states in India. Plants and their associ-
found to be able to survive without food for ated insects must have been carried to new areas
extended periods, which should again enhance by people for many centuries and people still
their dispersal success (Gullan and Kosztarab carry infested plant material, as shown by the
1997). Male and female nymphs do not differ in numerous quarantine interception records.
their dispersal behaviour or in their dispersal Because of their cryptic habits and small size,
success when dispersal is via crawler locomo- mealybugs are difcult to detect at borders dur-
tion. All the mealybug instars can be transported ing quarantine inspections, especially if their
on infested leaves blown by the wind. In addi- population density on plants is low (Gullan and
tion, water, bed-soil, humans and domestic and Martin 2003).
148 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

References Kosztarab M, Kozr F (1988) Scale insects of Central


Europe. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht
Malsch AKF, Kaufmann E, Heckroth HP, Williams DJ,
Addis T, Azerefegne F, Alemu T, Lemawork S, Tadesse E,
Maryati M, Maschwitz U (2001) Continuous transfer
Gemu M, Blomme G (2010) Biology, geographical
of subterranean mealybugs (Hemiptera,
distribution, prevention and control of enset root
Pseudococcidae) by Pseudolasius spp. (Hymenoptera,
mealybug, Cataenococcus ensete (Homoptera:
Formicidae) during colony ssion? Inst Soc
Pseudococcidae) in Ethiopia. (Special Issue: Bananas,
48:333341
Plantains and ensete II.). Tree For Sci Biotechnol
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1993) Bionomics and man-
4(1):3946
agement of the striped mealybug, Ferrisia virgata
Francardi V, Covassi M (1992) Biological and ecological
(CklI.) a review. Agric Rev 14(1):2243
notes on Planococcus vovae (Nasonov) (Homoptera,
Mckenzie HM (1967) Ecology in mealybugs of California.
Pseudococcidae) living on Juniperus spp. in Tuscany.
University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 1622
Redia 75:120 (in Italian, English abstract)
Miller DR (2005) Selected scale insect groups (Hemiptera:
Franco JC (1994) Citrus phenology as a basis to study the
Coccoidea) in the southern region of the United States.
population dynamics of the citrus mealybug complex
Fla Entomol 88:482501
in Portugal. In: Tribulato E, Gentile A, Reforgiato G
Misra CS (1920) Tukra disease of mulberry. Report of the
(eds) Proceedings of the international society of citri-
proceedings of the third entomological meeting held at
culture, Acireale, Italy, 1992. International Society of
Pusa on 3rd to 5th February 1919, pp 610618
Citriculture 3:929930
Nestel D, Cohen H, Saphir N, Klein M, Mendel Z (1995)
Geiger CA, Daane KM (2001) Seasonal movement and
Spatial distribution of scale insects comparative
distribution of the grape mealybug (Homoptera:
study using Taylors power-law. Environ Entomol
Pseudococcidae): developing a sampling program for
24:506512
San Joaquin Valley vineyards. J Econ Entomol
Ranjan R (2006) Economic impacts of pink hibiscus
94:291301
mealybug in Florida and the United States. Stochast
Godfrey K, Ball J, Gonzalez D, Reeves E (2003)
Environ Res Risk Assess 20:353362
Biology of the vine mealybug in vineyards in the
Washburn JO, Washburn L (1984) Active aerial dispersal
Coachella Valley, California. Southwest Entomol
of minute wingless arthropods: exploitation of bound-
28:183196
ary layer velocity gradients. Science 223:10881089
Gullan PJ, Kosztarab M (1997) Adaptations in scale
Williams DJ (1998) Mealybugs of the genera
insects. Annu Rev Entomol 42:2350
Eumyrmococcus Silvestri and Xenococcus Silvestri
Gullan P, Martin JH (2003) Sternorrhyncha (jumping
associated with the ant genus Acropyga Roger and a
plant lice, whiteies, aphids, and scale insects). In:
revision of the subfamily Rhizicinae (Hemiptera;
Resh VH, Card RT (eds) Encyclopedia of insects.
Coccodea, Pseudococcidae). Bull Nat Hist Mus Lond
Academic, Amsterdam
Entomol 67:164
Helms KR, Vinson SB (2002) Widespread association of
Williams DJ, Granara de Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs
the invasive ant Solenopsis invicta with an invasive
of Central and South America. CABI, Wallingford,
mealybug. Ecology 83:24252438
635 p
Herren HR, Neuenschwander P (1991) Biological control
Xie Y, Zhao J, Guo Y, Li Y, Zhang H, Guo Y (1999) The
of cassava pests in Africa. Annu Rev Entomol
biology of Phenacoccus azalea Kuwana, a pest of
36:257283
bungle prickly ash (Zanthoxylum bungeanum Maxim)
Kosztarab M (1996) Scale insects of northeastern North
forest in northern China. Entomology 33:377382
America: identication, biology and distribution.
Yamazaki K, Sugiura S (2005) Hemiptera as cecido-
Virginia Museum of Natural History, Martinsville
phages. Entomol News 116:121126
Natural Enemies of Mealybugs
13
A.N. Shylesha and M. Mani

Mealybugs are found attacked by various natural Syrphidae, Cecidomyiidae, Chamaeyiidae and
enemies in nature. The outbreak of mealybugs Drosophilidae (Diptera) are known to feed on
was observed in many instances with the applica- the mealybugs besides the spiders, mantids,
tion of broad-spectrum insecticides, which might ground beetles, assassin bugs, predatory stink
have disturbed the activity of natural enemies bugs, minute pirate bugs and predatory thrips.
particularly parasitoids and predators. This They are polyphagus feeding on a variety of
clearly indicates the importance of natural ene- mealybugs. Naturally occurring predators are
mies in the regulatory role of the mealybug popu- capable of suppressing the mealybugs on several
lation. In fact, there is a very rich natural complex occasions.
on arboreal mealybugs, but there is a poor natural
enemy complex, particularly natural predators or
parasites on root mealybugs. Withdrawal of 13.1.1 Coleoptera
insecticides results in the reappearance of natural
enemies, thereby regulating the mealybug popu- 13.1.1.1 Coccinellidae
lation. The natural enemies of the pests can be Both adults and larvae feed voraciously on all
divided into three categories depending on how stages of the mealybugs including the egg masses.
they feed on the pests. They are predators, para- The larvae of many predatory coccinellids are
sitoids or pathogens. covered with white waxy laments very similar
to the mealybugs. The adults are brightly
coloured. The eggs are oval shaped, yellow and
13.1 Predators very small. The larvae are voracious feeders
though the adults are also known to feed on the
Insects belonging to Coccinellidae (Coleoptera), mealybugs. Development from egg to adult bee-
Chrysopidae and Hemerobiidae (Neuroptera), tle takes 2530 days at 25 C. The species belong-
Lycaenidae and Noctuidae (Lepidoptera) and ing to genera Cryptolaemus, Brumus,
Aspidimerus, Stictobura, Orcus, Diomus, Nephus,
Sidis, Parasidis, Pseudoscymnus, Hyperaspis,
A.N. Shylesha (*)
ICAR-National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Scymnus, Sasajiscymnus, Exochomus,
Insect Resources, Bangalore 560 024, India Brumoides, Cleophora, Harmonia etc. are some
e-mail: anshylesha@gmail.com of the important predators of mealybugs. Among
M. Mani the coccinellids, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Mulsant was extensively used to control a variety
Bangalore 560089, India
of mealybugs throughout the world.
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 149


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_13
150 A.N. Shylesha and M. Mani

Cryptolaemus montrouzieri about 30 days at a temperature of 25 C. During


Cryptolaemus montrouzieri is native of Australia her lifespan, a female can lay up to 400 eggs.
popularly known as the Australian ladybird bee- The eggs are deposited within the egg masses of
tle, often referred to as the mealybug destroyer. the mealybugs. Cryptolaemus eggs are brighter
Adult beetles are about 4 mm long, oval in shape, and quite larger. The larvae are covered with
black in colour with a light brown head and pos- long white wax laments. At rst sight, they
terior. Cryptolaemus larvae grow up to 13 mm very closely resemble the mealybugs. However,
long and are covered with long, white, waxy la- Cryptolaemus larvae move faster and are more
ments. The Cryptolaemus preys upon several uffy in their appearance. The larvae will eat
species of mealybugs. It is less effective when each other whenever the food availability is poor.
the temperature is below 20 C or when the For pupation, the larvae will go to a hidden
humidity level is low (<40 % relative humidity place. The pupae look very similar to the larvae,
(RH)). Cryptolaemus prefers a warm and humid quite larger and somewhat more uffy (Mani
climate. The egg to adult development takes et al. 1991).

Cryptolaemus on mealybugs Nephus includens

Hyperaspis trilineata Mulsant can, during her lifetime, lay from 300 to 400
Hyperaspis trilineata Mulsant is a principal pred- eggs. The larvae are covered with white waxy
ator of Saccharicoccus sacchari (Cockerell). It is laments, very similar to that of mealybugs. The
reported to have a peculiar type of egg that is at beetle larvae are ufer and can run faster. The
rst at and resembles a whitey larva. They are larvae are often little in the crop because they are
laid singly and are hatched in 810 days. The very small and often found in the egg mass of the
young larvae feed for a time on mealybug crawl- mealybug. The eggs of mealybugs are oval
ers before developing their cottony covering. shaped, yellow and very small, but in practice not
About 3 weeks are required for larval develop- visible. Both adult beetles and larvae eat mealy-
ment followed by pupal development and adult bugs. When a mealybug is eaten, the dead
emergence. remains can be seen on trees as white uffy mat-
ter. The larvae mainly feed on eggs and young
Nephus includens Kirsch mealybugs. They can consume up to about 100
Nephus includens Kirsch is a predator of the cit- eggs per day or about 50 young mealybugs.
rus mealybug. Adult beetles are dark; they have
four orange/yellow spots on their backs. They are Scymnus coccivora Ayyar
about 2 mm in size. Its eggs are laid in the egg Scymnus coccivora Ayyar is known to feed on
mass laid by the mealybug. The female beetle several species of the mealybugs. Adults are light
13 Natural Enemies of Mealybugs 151

brown in colour measuring 1.7 1.3 mm in size. 1.2 and 5.2 days, respectively, and the total life
The pale yellow eggs are deposited singly in the cycle is completed in 23 days. The sex ratio is
colony of mealybugs. The grub has instars. Long 1:1. A single grub S. coccivora was known to
waxy strands develop on the later stage of the consume 308 eggs or 62 nymphs or 6.55 adult
grub. The pupa is oval and light brown in colour mealybugs (Mani and Thontadaraya 1987).
fringed with short brown hairs. The egg, grub,
prepupal and pupal stages occupy 4.1, 4.2, 9.5,

C. sexmaculata B. suturalis H. octomaculata Nephus regularis S. coccivora

13.1.2 Neuroptera length, usually on the underside of a leaf.


Immediately after hatching, the larvae moult,
13.1.2.1 Chrysopidae then ascend the egg stalk to feed. The larvae are
Green lacewings are delicate insects 14- to 12- spindle shaped, some camouaged within the
in. long with a wingspan of 6 to >65 mm, and the host mealybugs. They are voracious predators.
largest forms are tropical. Adults are often seen Larvae of green lacewings found feeding the
around the foliage. They are characterized by a early stage of mealybug nymphs. A single larva
wide costal wing venation, which includes the of Mallada boninensis is capable of consuming
cross veins. The bodies are usually bright green 350500 nymphs in its development. The spe-
to greenish-brown, and the compound eyes are cies belonging to genera Chrysopa, Chrysoperla
conspicuously golden in many species. The and Mallada are the well-known predators of
wings are usually translucent with a slight irides- mealybugs. The stalked eggs of the green lace-
cence; some have green wing veins or a cloudy wings are commonly seen in many plants
brownish wing pattern. Eggs are deposited at infested with sucking pests including mealy-
night, singly or in small groups; each female bugs. Chrysoperla carnea is used to control the
produces approximately 100200 eggs. Each mealybugs in green houses. They carry the trash
egg is hung on a slender stalk about 1 cm in over their bodies.

Life stages of green lacewing

Adult Eggs Larva on mealybugs Larva carrying trash


152 A.N. Shylesha and M. Mani

Mallada boninensis veins are forked. The larvae of the brown lace-
A single larva of M. boninensis was able to prey wings belonging to genus Hemerobius, and
about 345, 490 and 560 nymphs of Ferrisia vir- Sympherobius prefer to prey the early stage of the
gata, Planococcus lilacinus and P. citri, respec- mealybugs, though they are known to feed all the
tively (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 1990). three nymphal instars of the female mealybugs.
The rst-instar larvae of Sympherobius fallax
Chrysoperla carnea consume the second stage of the long-tailed
The larvae of the Ch. carnea grubs were found as mealybug P. longispinus more than any other
active predators on the mealybugs, and the preda- stages and did not eat the fourth (adult) stage,
tory grub preyed on all the stages of the mealy- while the second-stage S. fallax preferred the
bug. A single larva was known to consume 378 third-stage mealybugs. The third-stage S. fallax
eggs or 730 nymphs, or 95 adult females of P. also preferred the third-stage mealybugs. In the
citri. choice experiment, the rst-stage larval predators
preferred the second-stage mealybugs signi-
13.1.2.2 Hemerobiidae cantly more than the other two stages, while the
Hemerobiidae is a family of the Neuropteran second- and third-stage predators preferred the
insects commonly known as brown lacewings. third-stage mealybugs signicantly more than the
These insects differ from the somewhat similar second and the fourth stages. Darkness had a
Chrysopidae (green lacewings) not only by the marked effect on the feeding efciency of all
usual colouring but also by the wing venation. stages of S. fallax. The number of mealybugs
Hemerobiids have numerous long veins that are eaten in the light was signicantly greater (Gillani
lacking in chrysopids. Some of the costal cross et al. 2009).

Larva of Sympherobius Adult Sympherobius

13.1.3 Lepidoptera same wing can be seen; in some specimens, this


spot is slightly diffused. On the underside, it is
13.1.3.1 Lycaenidae pale, silky, brownish-white; fore- and hindwings
The Apey Spalgis epeus Westwood is a small crossed by numerous, very slender, short, sinu-
buttery found in Asia. It gets its name due to the ous, transverse, dark brown strigae, which are
face resemblance of ape that can be seen from the outwardly slender edged with brownish-white of
head-on view of the pupa. The male is dull brown a shade paler than that of the ground-colour. Both
on the upperside and slightly darker towards the the wings have an anticiliary dark brown line on
apex of the forewing; also a more or less quadrate the inner side with similar edging. Forewing, in
whitish spot beyond the apex of the cell on the addition, has an oval white spot beyond the cell.
13 Natural Enemies of Mealybugs 153

The cilia of both the fore- and hindwings are of slightly paler brown. In the forewing, the cell and
the same shade as that of the ground colour of the apex are darker, with a white spot similar to that
wings. The antenna, head, thorax and abdomen in the male but larger, beyond the apex of the cell;
are pale brown in colour, and the club of the in most specimens, it is extended diffusely out-
antennae is ochraceous at apex; beneath are the wards and downwards. The hindwing is similar
palpi and thorax brownish-grey and the abdomen to that of the male. The underside is as precise as
pale brown in colour. In female, the upperside is in the male.

Life stages of Spalgis epeus

Second instar caterpillar Third instar caterpillar Final instar caterpillar Adult buttery

The lycaenid predator Spalgis epeus was com- ing to Drosophilidae, Cecidomyiidae, Syrphidae
monly associated with the natural control of the etc. are known to attack the mealybugs. The
mealybugs Rastrococcus iceryoides, Planococcus dipteran larvae feed voraciously on the
lilacinus, Pl. citri, Ferrrisia virgata, Paracoccus mealybugs.
marginatus etc. The larvae of Spalgis epeus were
observed to predate on root mealybug colonies 13.1.4.1 Cecidomyiidae
especially those at the base of the stems In this family, the larvae of a large number of spe-
(Devasahayam et al. 2009). Although Spalgis cies are predaceous on the mealybugs. These
lemolea was a common natural enemy of insects are very tiny, usually only 23 mm in
Phenacoccus madeirensis infesting cassava in length. The adults, which are very tiny, fragile
Africa (Herren and Neuenschwander 1991), its midges, locate colonies of appropriate prey. The
potential utility as an effective biological control eggs are laid near the base of the mealybug host;
agent was thwarted by its erratic occurrence. At the larva tunnel underneath the host and feed on
2530 C and 4060 % RH, the mean duration of the eggs or developing coccid nymphs. As the
the egg, larval and pupal stage of Spalgis epeus small, maggot-like larvae are incapable of mov-
on Pa. marginatus is 3.5, 12.0 and 10.3, respec- ing to considerable distances, there usually has to
tively, and the mean duration from egg to adult be a fair population of the prey present, before
emergence was 26 days, and it takes 24 days on the adults will lay eggs. The life cycle is com-
Pl. citri to complete the life cycle (Dinesh et al. pleted in 25 days. The total number of eggs
2010). As for the predatory potential of S. epeus, deposited by the female averaged 36 during her
the total number of papaya mealybugs consumed very short lifespan, which averaged 2.3 days. The
during the larval stage was 4,115 eggs, 281 larvae of Dicrodiplosis manihoti Harris were
nymphs and 77 female adults. found to prey on the egg masses of the cassava
mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti in the Congo
and Senegal. Kalodiplosis pseudococci Felt has
13.1.4 Diptera given signicant control of D. brevipes in con-
junction with two parasitoids. Triommata coc-
Several dipterans are found as predators in the cidivora Felt plays a supplementary role in
concealed mealybug niche. The insects belong- regulating the mealybug population.
154 A.N. Shylesha and M. Mani

13.1.4.2 Chamaeyiidae 13.1.4.4 Syrphidae


Chamaeyiidae is a small family of acalyptratae Syrphid larvae are predatory on the mealybugs
ies. The larvae are the predators of the but are of minor importance (Table 13.1).
mealybugs.

13.1.4.3 Drosophlidae 13.1.5 Other Predators


Larvae of the predatory drosophilids are found
feeding on the colonies of nymphs. They play a The rat Millardia meltada meltada gnawed
supplementary role in regulating the mealybug through the lower dry leaf sheaths and devoured
population. the mealybugs Saccharicoccus sacchari at the
nodes of sugarcane.

Pirate bugs feed on the mealybugs Crab spiders feed on the mealybugs

Table 13.1 List of predators recorded on the mealybugs


Predator species Mealybug species
Coleoptera, Coccinellidae Coccidohystrix insolita
Anegleis cardoni (Weise)
Brumoides suturalis (Fab.) M. hirsutus, P. lilacinus, F. virgata, Ph. solenopsis,
Pa. marginatus, Coccidohystrix insolita (Green)
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant Many mealybug species
Coleophora pupillata (Schonherr) Several mealybugs
Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fab.) Ph. soleneopsis, F. virgata, Pa. marginatus
Curinus coeruleus Mulsant Nipaecoccus nipae (Maskell)
Chilocorus stigma (Say) Pl. citri
Chilocorus nigrita (Fabricius) S. sacchari
Chilocorus sp. Pa. marginatus
Chilocorus bipustulatus L. Phenacoccus mespili Ben-Dov
Decadiomus bahamicus (Casey) Pl. citri
Diomus notescens (Blackburn) Several mealybugs
Diomus hennesseyi Fiirsch Ph. manihoti
Exochomus aviventris Mader Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero
Exochomus troberti Mulsant Phenacoccus manihoti
Exochomus avipes (Thunberg) Phenacoccus manihoti
Exochomus concavus Fursch Phenacoccus manihoti
Exochomus metallicus Korsch Planaococcus citri (Risso)
(continued)
13 Natural Enemies of Mealybugs 155

Table 13.1 (continued)


Predator species Mealybug species
Exochomus nigripennis (Erichs.) Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead)
Exochomus melanocephalus (Zubkoff) Saccharicoccus sacchari (Cockerell)
Harmonia octomaculata (F.) Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley
Harmonia maindroni Sicard Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green), P. lilacinus,
Coccidohystrix insolita (Green)
Hippodamia convergens (Gurin-Mneville) Ph. solenopsis
Hippodamia variegata Goeze Ph. solenopsis
Hyperaspis limbatus Casey Saccharicoccus sacchari (Ckll.)
Hyperaspis silvestri Weise Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell)
Hyperaspis trilineata Mulsant Saccharicoccus sacchari
Hyperaspis onerata (Mulsant) Phenacoccus herreni Cox and Williams
Hyperaspis egregia Mader Planococcoides njalensis (Laing)
Hyperaspis marmottani (Fairm.) Phenacoccus manihoti
Hyperaspis senegalensis hottentotta Mulsant Phenacoccus manihoti
Hyperaspis raynevali (French) Phenacoccus manihoti
Hyperaspis aestimabilis Mader Phenacoccus manihoti
Hyperaspis pumila Muls. Phenacoccus manihoti
Hyperaspis onerata (Muls.) Phenacoccus manihoti
Horniolus vietnamicus Miyatake P. lilacinus
Midas pygmaeus Blackburn Ps. calceolariae
Nephus vetustus Weise Phenacoccus manihoti
Nephus regularis Sicard Ph. solenopsis, Coccidohystrix insolita
Nephus reunion (Fursch Pseudococcus sp.
Nephus bipunctatus (Kug.) N. viridis
Nephus bilucernarius Mulsant Nephus bilucernarius Mulsant
Pesudoscymnus pallidicollis (Mulsant) M. hirsutus
Platynaspis strictica philippenensis Korchefsky Planococcus kenyae (LePelley)
Pseudoscymnus pallidicollis (Mulsant) Pl. citri
Pullus pallidicollis (Mulsant) P. lilacinus, Pl. citri
Sasajiscymnus quinquepunctatus (Weise) Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de
Willink
Scymnus binaevatus Mulsant Pseudococcus calceolariae (Maskell)
Scymnus coccivora Ayyar M. hirsutus, P. lilacinus, F. virgata, Ph. solenopsis,
Pa. marginatus
Scymnus nubilus Muls. M. hirsutus
Scymnus syriacus F. virgate
Scymnus gratiosus Wiese M. hirsutus
Scymnus severini Weise P. lilacinus
Scymnus margipaliens Muls. D. brevipes
Scymnus couturier G. Ph. manihoti
Scymnus sp. Geococcus citrinus Kuwana
Scymnus avifrons Blackburn Pl. citri
Scymnus (Pullus) uncinatus Sicard D. brevipes
Scymnus pictus Gorham D. brevipes
Coleoptera, Nitidulidae S. sacchari
Carpophilus marginellus Motsch
(continued)
156 A.N. Shylesha and M. Mani

Table 13.1 (continued)


Predator species Mealybug species
Coleoptera, Lathridiidae M. hirsutus
Melanophthalma carinulata Motsch
Diptera, Cecidomyiidae Planococcus kenyae, Planococcoides njalensis
Coccodiplosis coffeae (Barnes) (Donald)
Coccodiplosis citri Barnes Phenacoccus manihoti
Cleodiplosis koebelei (Felt) D. brevipes
Diadiplosis koebelei (Koebele) Several mealybugs
Diadiplosis coccidivora (Felt) F. virgate
Dicrodiplosis manihoti Harr. Phenacoccus manihoti
Dicrodiplosis sp. Planococcus citri, P. lilacinus, N. viridis
Gitona sp. F. virgate
Kalodiplosis koebelei (Felt) Ps. calceolariae
Kalodiplosis pseudococci (Felt) D. brevipes
Kalodiplosis coccidarum (Felt) Ph. herreni
Lobodiplosis pseudococci Felt D. brevipes
Triommato coccidivora (Felt) P. lilacinus (Risso)
Vincentodiplosis pseudococci D. brevipes
Diptera, Chamaeyiidae R. iceryoides, P. lilacinus, Brevennia rehi
Leucopis luteicornis Malloch.
Leucopis sp. F. virgate
Leucopis ocellaris Mall Pseudococcus comstocki
Leucopis alticeps Czerny Phenacoccus mespili Ben-Dov, P. citri
Diptera, Drosophilidae P. citri, P. lilacinus, S. sacchari, Phenacoccus
Cacoxenus (Gitonides) perspicax (Knab) manihoti
Rhinoleucophenga capixabensis sp. nov. Dysmicoccus brevipes
Domomyza perspicax (Knab) P. citri, Brevennia rehi (Lindinger)
Diptera, Syrphidae
Ocyptamus argentinus Curr. F. virgata
Xanthogramma javana Wd. F. virgate
Allobaccha eclara (Curran) Phenacoccus manihoti
Diptera, Chloropidae Brevennia rehi (Lindinger)
Anatrichus pygmaeus Lamb
Neuroptera, Chrysopidae M. hirsutus
Apertochrysa sp.
Anisochrysa basalis Walker Pl. citri
Anisochrysa boninensis (Okaomota) Coccidohystrix insolita
Brinckochrysa scelestes Banks M. hirsutus
Ceratochrysa antica (Wlk.) Phenacoccus manihoti
Chrysopa ramburi Schneider Ps. Calceolariae
Chrysopa sp. Phenacoccus manihoti, N. viridis
Chrysoperla carnea (Stephans) P. citri, F. virgate
Chrysopa lacciperda (Kimmis) P. citri, Ph. solenopsis, Ph. mespili
Chrysoperla rulabris (Burmeister) Ps. longispinus (Targioni Tozzetti)
Chrysoperla zastrowi Sillemi (Esben-Petersen) Pa. marginatus
Chrysopa lateralis Guerin Pl. citri
(continued)
13 Natural Enemies of Mealybugs 157

Table 13.1 (continued)


Predator species Mealybug species
Oligochrysa lutea (Wlk.) Ph. solenopsis
Mallada boninensis (Okamota) Many mealybugs
Plesiochrysa lacciperda (Kimmins), Pl. citri
Neuroptera, Hemerobiidae Ps. calceolariae
Sympherobius amicus Navas
Sympherobius barberi (Banks) Ps. longispinus, P. citri
Sympherobius pygamaeus (Rambur) M. hirsutus
Psectra iniqua (Hagen) Rastrococcus invadens Williams
Neuroptera, Coniopterygidae M. hirsutus
Conwentzia psociformis (Curtis)
Cryptoscenea australiensis (Enderlein) Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret)
Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae Planoccuus kenyae, F. virgata, P. manihoti
Spalgis lemolea Druce
Spalgis epeus West wood P. citri, P. lilacinus, Ph. solenopsis, Pa.
marginatus, Coccidohystrix insolita, Nipaecoccus
nipae
Lepidoptera, Pyralidae P. citri
Laetilia coccidivora (Comstock)
Lepidoptera, Momphidae S. sacchari
Batrachedra sp. near psilopa Meyrick
Lepidoptera, Noctuidae P. lilacinus
Eublemma sp.
E. geyri Rild M. hirsutus
E. trifasciata Moore M. hirsutus
Autoba silicula Swinhoe M. hirsutus
Hemiptera, Coreidae M. hirsutus
Geocoris tricolor (Fab.)
Hemiptera, Miridae F. virgate
Deraeocoris sp.
Hemiptera: Anthocoridae Ph. manihoti
Cardiastethus exiguus Poppius

13.2 Parasitoids 13.2.1.1 Encyrtidae


Major parasitism in the mealybugs involves mem-
13.2.1 Hymenoptera bers of the wasp family Encyrtidae. The encyrtids
are koinobiont endoparasitoids, so that the parasit-
The parasitoids belonging to families Encyrtidae, ized mealybug continues to live for a few days, to
Aphelinidae, Platygastridae, Pteromalidae, grow and even to reproduce to some extent. This
Braconidae, Eucoilidae, Signiphoridae and time gap between parasitization and deterioration of
Eulopidae are known to attack the mealybugs. the physiological condition enables the mealybug to
Among them, encyrtids, aphelinids and platygas- confront the immature individual parasitoid by
trids play a major role in the regulation of encapsulation. The encapsulation is a common
mealybugs. immune defense mechanism that involves the for-
mation of a capsule around the parasitoid egg or
158 A.N. Shylesha and M. Mani

larva; it is usually composed of host blood cells and full-grown parasitoid emerges through an exit hole
the pigment melanin. The capsule may kill the para- at the distal part of the cocoon, leaving the lid
sitoid and thus prevent successful parasitism behind. Full development of the parasitoid takes
(Blumberg 1997). Various levels of encapsulation place inside the mealybug. Adult parasitoids feed
have been shown to occur in different mealybug themselves by piercing the young instars of the
species, in response to parasitism by encyrtids mealybugs and sucking from their bodies. By
(Blumberg 1997; Blumberg and van Driesche 2001; doing so, they can extend their lifespan. This feed-
Chong and Oetting 2007; Giordanengo and Nenon ing behaviour kills the young mealybug-instars.
1990; Sagarra et al. 2000). Conversely, encyrtid Parasitized mealybugs turn into a yellow/orange
parasitoids may use superparasitism as a strategy to cocoon and become hard (like mummies). These
overcome the immune response of unsuitable hosts mummies are difcult to see, because of their
(Blumberg et al. 2001). Besides superparasitism, small size. In this period, a female can lay about 80
other factors also affect the frequency of parasitoid eggs, most of them in the rst weeks of her life.
encapsulation including: (a) host and parasitoid spe- Anagyrus is a large genus of the family
cies; (b) the hosts physiological age and condition; Encyrtidae that attacks the mealybugs. Some
(c) the host and parasitoid origins (or strains); (d) important species like Anagyrus aegyptiacus, A.
the rearing and/or ambient temperature; and (e) the dactylopii, A. kamali, A. pseudococci play the
host plant species and stress conditions (Blumberg major role in suppressing the mealybugs. Other
1997; Calatayud et al. 2002). encyrtids, namely Leptomastidea abnormis,
Noyes and Hayat (1994) recorded 49 encyrtid Leptomastix dactylopii, Acerophagus papayae,
species as parasitoids of mealybugs in India. The Apoanagyrus lopezii, Aenasius bambawalei and
family Encyrtidae dominates the parasitoid com- Aenasius advena Comp., are found to be very
plex of mealybugs. Anagyrus, Apoanagyrus, effective parasitoids of mealybugs.
Adolescentus, Aenasius, Leptomastix,
Leptomastidea, Blepyrus, Gyranusoidea, Anagyrus antoninae (Timberlake)
Praleurocerus, Mahencyrtus, Acerophagus, It is an internal gregarious parasite of Antonina
Coccidoxenoides, Epidinocarsis, Neodusmetia, graminis. It is oriental in origin but common in
Hambletonia, Pseudaphycus and Alamella are Hawaii. It is active in cooler and high-humid areas.
some of the important genera under encyrtidae The female mates soon after the emergence and
attacking the mealybugs. They are sexually dimor- starts laying eggs immediately. Attack is on the
phic and both males and females are different from gravid female mealybugs. The stalked eggs are
each other. The males are smaller than the females unattached and free in the body uids of the mealy-
and have hairy antennae. The females have a bright bug and are hatched in 34 days. The larval and
band across the abdomen. The encyrtids are known prepupal stages cover 810 days. The pupal stage
to attack nymphs and adults of mealybugs. Each takes about 68 days, and the total life cycle is
species tends to specialize in terms of the stage of completed in 18 days. Up to seven adult parasites
development of the host. Certain species like emerge per mealybug and the sex ratio is 1:1. It is
Blepyrus insularis, Coccidoxenoides perminutus, carried out very well under Florida conditions.
Acerophagus papayae prefer earlier stage that is
58-day-old nymphs (early Second instar) for par- Neodusmetia sangwani (Subba Rao)
asitization, whereas species like Anagyrus dacty- It is an internal gregarious parasitoid of Antonina
lopii, Leptomastix dactylopii etc. prefer graminis and is native to India. Adult females are
1520-day-old mealybugs (third instar and young brachypterous and males are winged. They live
adult female). They breed very well when they are only for 2 days. The female produces up to 55
exposed to the preferred stage. The duration of the progeny. The sex ratio is 1:7. Life cycle is com-
life cycle is about 3 weeks at 25 C. Mealybugs pleted in 1723 days. Normal dispersal is very
that are parasitized turn into small cocoons, a little slow since the females are wingless. It has done
darker in colour than live mealybugs. The young very well under Texas conditions.
13 Natural Enemies of Mealybugs 159

Neodusmetia sangwani Hambletonia pseudococcina

Pseudaphycus mundus Gahan Blepyrus insularis


It is mainly a parasitoid of Dysmicoccus boni- It is also another internal parasitoid of F. virgata,
nensis, native of Lousiana. It attacks all stages of preferring to parasitize the early instars of the
the mealybug except the rst-instar nymphs. It mealybugs. It performs very well in glasshouse
deposits eggs in the body uids of the mealybug. crops infested with F. virgata (Mani and
From 2 to 15 min is required for oviposition. It Krishnamoorthy 1991).
takes 1618 days to complete the life cycle. It is
solitary in small mealybugs but lays up to 19 Coccidoxenoides perminutus
eggs on larger mealybugs. It did very well Coccidoxenoides perminutus Girault (Pauridia
against D. boninensis in sugarcane elds at peregrina Timberlake, Coccidoxenoides peregri-
Hawaii. nus (Timberlake)) is an endoparasitoid of
Planococccus citri widely present throughout the
Hambletonia pseudococcina Compere world. Coccidoxenoides perminutus alone or
It is bisexual in Brazil and unisexual in Columbia. along with other natural enemies is capable of sup-
The unisexual race was found to be relatively pressing P. citri. Besides Pl. citri, it also attacks
successful against D. brevipes in Hawaii. It is a Pseudococcus longispinus, Pl. cus and
solitary parasitoid. The females attack half- Pseudococcus viburni. Adult parasitoids are black
grown mealybugs and takes 2430 days to com- in colour with noticeable translucent wings, with
plete the life cycle. relatively long antennae and are approximately
3 mm long. Females lay their eggs into the rst
Aenasius advena three instars but prefer the second instar of Pl. citri
Aenasius advena Comp is a solitary internal par- and are able to lay 6090 eggs each. The eggs
asitoid of Ferrisia virgata. It occurs in large num- develop into pupae within the mealybug slowly
bers at times on F. virgata in guava and other crop feeding off the host. About 16 days after egg lay-
ecosystems in India and elsewhere. It prefers ing, adult C. perminutus wasps emerge from
15-day-old mealybugs and the lifecycle is com- pupae, and are immediately ready to mate and
pleted in about 18 days. Along with C. montrouz- continue the cycle. The speed of the lifecycle is
ieri, A. advena gives the perfect control of F. dependent on temperature and humidity. Generally,
virgata on guava and other crop ecosystems in C. perminutus adults are active for about 7 days
India. and are most effective at temperatures between 20
and 30 C and humidity between 50 and 90 %.
Each female lives for approximately 7 days.
160 A.N. Shylesha and M. Mani

Anagyrus fusciventris (Girault) bright blue eyes. Males are black in colour. Both
It is a parasitoid of Pseudococcus longispinus. sexes are about 3 mm in size. Mealybugs that are
Females are grey-brown in colour and have

Coccidoxenoides perminutus Anagyrus fusciventris

parasitized turn into small cocoons, a little darker rate of three to four per day. The eggs hatch in 44 h
in colour than the live mealybugs. It prefers larger and the lifecycle is completed in 18 days at 27 C.
instars for parasitization. The females lay one egg
per host; from each parasitized mealybug, one Leptomastix dactylopii Howard
adult wasp will emerge. The lower temperature It is widely used against Planococcus citri.
threshold for the parasitoid is 18 C. The parasit- Besides P. citri, it also breeds well on Pl. cus.
oid development from egg to adult takes about 3 It is a small yellow-/brown-coloured parasitic
weeks at a temperature of 25 C. Full development wasp with distinctively long dark antennae. It is
of the parasitoid takes place inside the mealybug. about 3 mm long. Males are smaller and darker
Adult parasitoids feed themselves by piercing the than females. The antennae of the females are
young instars of the mealybugs and sucking from bended; the antennae of the males are hairy. Eggs
their bodies. By doing so, they can extend their life are laid in the third instar and in the young adult
span to about 2 months. This feeding behaviour female mealybug. The females deposit one egg
kills the young mealybug instars. inside the mealybug body. A female lays about 100
eggs. After hatching, the young larva of the parasit-
Anagyrus pseudococci (Girault) oid eats the mealybug from inside out. The parasit-
Anagyrus pseudococci (Girault) is native of ized mealybugs turn into a yellow-brown cocoon
Mediterranean areas. It is known to attack Pl. citri and become hard (like mummies). The lower tem-
and Ps. citriculus. It attacks all the nymphal stages perature threshold for Leptomastix dactylopii is
and the adult females but prefers the third instar of the 20 C, but the optimal temperature is 26 C. At
mealybug. About 45 eggs are laid per female at the 25 C, this development takes about 1517 days.

Anagyrus pseudococci Leptomastix dactylopii


13 Natural Enemies of Mealybugs 161

Leptomastix epona The adult parasite emerges from a circular exit hole
It is a parasitoid of Pseudococcus viburni (Ps. af- at the proximal end of the cocoon, leaving a lid on
nis) and Spilococcus cactearum. Adult wasps are the mummy. It mainly parasitizes older instars of
brown-black with thin, long, black antennae. Their Ps. viburni and Spilococcus cactearum. It lays one
wings are mainly translucent with slight dark bands. egg per mealybug. Mealybugs are killed by the
Leptomastix epona is 3 mm in size. Mealybugs that growing larva approximately 10 days after parasit-
are parasitized turn into yellow cocoon like mum- ization. Lower temperature threshold for
mies, easily distinguishable from live mealybugs. Leptomastix epona is 15 C.

Leptomastix epona Pseudaphycus maculipennis

Acerophagus maculipennis Pseudaphycus malinus


Pseudaphycus maculipennis (Acerophagus mac- It is an internal parasitoid of Pseudococcus com-
ulipennis) was shown to be an arrhenotokous, stocki believed to be a native of Japan. It develops
synovigenic, gregarious endoparasitoid of as a solitary parasite in smaller mealybugs but
Pseudococcus viburni. Both females and males gregarious in larger mealybugs. Females deposit
lived for 16 and 11 days, respectively, when fed about 100 eggs in 410 days. Incubation is com-
either honey-agar or mealybug honeydew. pleted in 3 days, larval development in 8 days and
Relatively, large instars (third instar or adult pupal stage in 10 days.
females) were preferred for oviposition; mated
females parasitized more mealybugs than Leptomastidea abnormis
unmated females, and the progeny sex ratio Leptomastidea abnormis mainly parasitizes
favoured females by 3:1. Egg load increased with Planococcus citri. It is a grey-yellow parasitic
age from emergence to day 8, averaging 23 wasp, 0.751.5 mm in size; dark bands are clearly
mature eggs per female. Mean realized daily visible across the wings. Males are smaller than
fecundity never exceeded 5, with a mean lifetime females and have hairy antennae. The females
fecundity of 46 eggs per female. Parasitized have a bright band across the abdomen. The para-
mealybugs remained alive for about 5 days and sitized mealybugs turn into a yellow/orange
then mummied. Total development period was cocoon and become hard. Leptomastidea emerges
2021 days (larva 45 days, prepupa 3 days, from a circular hole in the proximal end of the
pupa 89 days). A mean of 3.0 parasitoids per mummy. Eggs are laid in the rst and second
mealybug were reared after individual parasitism instars of its host, one egg per mealybug. The
events, increasing through superparasitism inconspicuously stalked eggs are laid in the body
(either self or conspecic) to nine parasitoids per uid of the mealybugs and are hatched in 3 days.
mealybug when hosts were exposed to competing The tailed larva complete the development in 8
females. days and the lifecycle is completed in 17 days at
162 A.N. Shylesha and M. Mani

26 C. Mealybugs are killed by the larva of the is a tiny small wasp with yellowish body, trans-
parasitic wasp, growing inside the mealybug. parent wings and grey/bluish eyes with three
Leptomastidea can survive temperatures up to black triangular spots in the forehead. The male
40 C. parasitoid is much smaller than the female para-
sitoid. This parasitoid affects mainly the second
Acerophagus papayae stage after hatching from the egg. Each female is
It is a solitary endoparasitoid of papaya mealy- capable of laying 50 eggs in its lifetime of 35
bug Paracoccus marginatus A. It parasitizes the days. Normally, single egg is laid inside a mealy-
early-stage (II instar) nymphs of the mealybug. It bug; occasionally more than one egg is also laid.

Acerophagus papayae Leptomastidea abnormis

Anagyrus dactylopii Anagyrus indicus


It is the principal parasitoid of Nipaecoccus viri- The gregarious encyrtid parasitoid, Anagyrus
dis and Maconellicoccus hirsutus. It parasitizes indicus, oviposits in all three nymphal stages
all the nymphal instars but prefers third-instar and in the adult female stage of the spherical
nymph and adult female. They are sexually mealybug, Nipaecoccus viridis. But it prefers
dimorphic. Males are small, black with branched to the third nymphal and the adult female
antennae. Females are larger and brown in colour; mealybugs. The parasitoid development was
complete their life cycle in 15 days. the fastest, the number of parasitoids emerging
was the greatest and the ratio of female to male
Anagyrus aegyptiacus parasitoids was the highest following oviposi-
It is a solitary parasitoid of N. viridis. Females tion in the third nymphal and the adult female
deposit eggs in all the three nymphal instars and hosts.
hatch them in 4 days. There are six larval instars.
The complete life cycle covers 16 days. Anagyrus ananatis
The encyrtid A. ananatis (Subba Rao) prefers to
Anagyrus kamali parasitize adult females of Dysmicoccus brevi-
It is a solitary internal parasite of Maconellicoccus pes. It is capable of parasitizing up to 27 mealy-
hirsutus. The female deposits stalked eggs; the bugs. It can be found attacking the mealybugs in
attachment to the host derm is visible as an exter- the presence of ants, although its impact on
nal protrusion. The eggs hatch in 4 days. There mealybug mortality is low. When ants are
are six larval instars. The combined prepupal and absent, the parasitoid is highly effective in low-
pupal stages cover only 3 days. The life cycle is ering the mealybug populations in pineapple
completed in 18 days at 25 C. plantings.
13 Natural Enemies of Mealybugs 163

Anagyrus indicus Gyranusoidea tebygi

Gyranusoidea tebygi periods recorded were 18, 17, 16 and 14 days for
It is a native parasitoid of Rastrococcus invadens the rst, second, third and fourth nymphal instars,
Williams in India. The introduction of respectively. Oviposition commenced within
Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes into Togo and Benin 24 h of emergence and lasted effectively for 6
was capable of eliminating R. invadens. It repro- days, during which 95 % of its eggs were laid and
duced on rst, second and third instars and it 1012 large hosts were killed through host feed-
avoided hosts that were already parasitized. Host ing. Sex ratio is 1:3.
feeding was occasionally observed. Sex ratios of
the offspring were male biased in smaller hosts, Aenasius bambawalei
as opposed to being female biased in larger hosts. It is a solitary endoparasitoid of Phenacoccus
Females had longer developmental times than solenopsis Tinsley in India and Pakistan. Egg and
males, developed faster in larger mealybugs than larval stages of the parasitoid are not visible
in smaller ones and were always larger than the being an internal feeder, but swelling and poor
males emerging from the same host instar. Their movement of the parasitized mealybugs were
size increased with the instar of the host at ovipo- observed after 23 days of parasitization. The
sition. About 90 % of all ovipositions in second- parasitized mealybugs transformed into dark-
and third-instar nymphs resulted from an attack brown mummies within 47 days. The pupae of
with multiple stings, starting with a sting in the A. bambawalei Hayat were barrel shaped with
head of the host for the most part. dark-brown colour. Duration of the pupal period
ranged from 5 to 8 days. Adults emerged by cut-
Apoanagyrus lopezii ting a circular small hole on the mummies after
Apoanagyrus (Epidinocarsis) lopezi (De Santis) completion of the pupal period. The adults of
is a species of the parasitic wasp native to Central both the sexes are shiny black in colour. Males
America. It is used as a biological control agent were smaller than females. The maximum devel-
against the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus mani- opmental time was recorded for the second-instar
hoti Matile-Ferrero in Africa. The parasitoid is host nymph as compared to the third instar. The
found to parasitize and complete development in males developed faster than the females in all
all developmental instars of Ph. manihoti. host stages. The overall sex ratio was 1:2. The
However, the parasitoid mortality was high maximum number of female wasps developed at
(15 %) when the development took place in the third-instar nymph (59.6 %), and it was con-
rst nymphal instar of the host. Complete devel- cluded that the third-instar host nymph appeared
opment from egg to adult emergence was pro- to be the most suitable host stage for mass
longed in smaller hosts, and the developmental rearing.
164 A.N. Shylesha and M. Mani

Clausenia purpurea Ishii supplementary role in suppressing the


It is a known parasitoid of Ps. citriculus and Ps. mealybugs.
comstocki. It attacks the rst and second mealy-
bug instars. Males are rare. Each female deposits Allotropa burrelli
about 200 eggs in 1520 days. Life cycle is com- Allotropa burrelli Mues. is a gregarious parasit-
pleted in 2530 days. oid of Pseudococcus comstocki (Kuw.), with
incubation stage averaging 9.5 days and larval
Hungariella spp. stage averaging 6.5 days. There is a single larval
H. pretiosa (Timverlake) is known to attack Ps. instar; prepupa averaging 2.0 days; pupa averag-
fraglis. It is a solitary internal parasitoid of the ing 13.0 days. The sex ratio has ranged from 2:1
second-instar mealybug nymphs. Most of 100 to 3:1, with females predominating. The adults
200 eggs per female are laid during the rst day are small and short lived, and oviposit at random
of its life. The egg enlarges eightfold before in the host body cavity. There is no preoviposi-
hatching. Incubation and larval period are 6 and tion period. All nymphal stages of the mealybugs
17 days, respectively. The life cycle is completed are attacked, but a preference is shown for those
in 23 days. Sex ratio is 1:1. H. peregrina at least half grown. The life cycle ranges from 26
(Compere) is attacking Ps. longispinus. to 38 days, with an average of 31 days.

Anarhopus sydneyensis Timberlake Allotropa citri


It is native of Australia known to parasitize Ps. It can parasitize all stages of Pseudococcus cryp-
longispinus. It is a solitary parasitoid preferring tus. It prefers the rst- and the second-instar
to attack the third-instar nymphs and the life nymphs. The lower developmental threshold
cycle covers 1 month. temperature and thermal constant of A. citri for
the rst- and second-instar nymphs of P. cryptus
Tetracnemoidea inica (Ayyar) were 10.1 C and 518.1 degree-days (DD),
It is a solitary parasitoid of Planococcus lilaci- respectively.
nus. It attacks all the nymphal instars but prefers
5-day-old nymphs, which yielded higher number Allotropa suasaardi
of parasitoids and also female progenies. It takes Allotropa suasaardi Sarkar and Polaszek is a par-
2633 days to complete the life cycle (Mani and asitoid of Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero
Krishnamoorthy 1995). on cassava in Thailand. The mean developmental
time was shorter and a higher number of progeny
13.2.1.2 Platygastridae were produced in Dysmicoccus neobrevipes fol-
Parasitoid wasps, belonging to the hymenopteran lowed by Ph. manihoti.
family Platygastridae (sometimes incorrectly
spelled Platygasteridae), are mostly very small Allotropa japonica
(12 mm), black and shining, with elbowed Allotropa japonica is a platygastrid parasitoid of
antennae that have an eight-segmented agellum. Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green). It oviposits on
The wings most often lack venation, though they all the three nymphal stages and the adult female
may have slight fringes of setae. Several species mealybugs. Freshly laid eggs of A. japonica are
of the genus Allotropa are known to attack very small, elongated, whitish and transparent.
mealybugs. They complete the life cycle in 25 They become more or less spherical after 24 h.
days at 25 C. It oviposits on all the three nymphal Incubation period ranges from 4 to 6 days, the
stages and on the adult female mealybugs. It pre- average being 5.5 days. Usually one to three eggs
fers 1015-day-old mealybugs (second and early are found in a parasitized mealybug. The larval
third instar nymphs) for parasitization. Adults are development is completed in 46 days, there is
small and short lived (Mani and Krishnamoorthy but one larval instar with ten body segments.
1989; Clancy 1944; Gilliat 1939). They play a Prepupal and pupal periods last for 23 days and
13 Natural Enemies of Mealybugs 165

1290 days, respectively. The total life cycle of Adult aphelinids may feed on honeydew
A. japonica sp. n. is completed in 25.5 days. exuded by their hosts or on secretions issuing
Adults are small and short-lived. Longevity of from the wound caused during oviposition. The
the adults ranges from 7 to 11 days. The males eggs of aphelinids are often stalked. A number of
have long, hirsute, moniliform antennae, while endoparasitic species have an apneustic caudate
the females have shorter and distinctly clavate primary larva. Those that are endoparasitoids
antennae. Mating and oviposition takes place (e.g. Coccophagus) have larvae with neither spir-
readily. The adults exhibit a very good searching acles nor a functioning tracheal system. Some
capacity. A maximum of 238.16 parasitoids was species pupate inside the living host within a
obtained when the third-instar nymphs of 15 days pupation chamber, which becomes lled with air.
old were offered to A. japonica sp. n. for parasit- There is some evidence that the air inside this
ization (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 1989) chamber is derived from the hosts tracheal sys-
tem as in the Encyrtidae. Parasitoids emerge by
Allotropa utilis Muesbeck cutting a hole through the integument of the host
It is an internal, solitary parasitoid of nymphs of mummy; but if the mealybug has a delicate cov-
Phenacoccus aceris (Signoret) and Ph. pergandi ering, they push their way out from beneath it.
Ckll, native of Nova Scotia. It is reported to have The adults of some such species lack functional
a single generation. It attacks the smaller nymphs mandibles. Overwintering is normally as a
from July to October. Eggs laid in the body uid mature larva or pupa. The Aphelinidae are very
of the mealybugs increase sixfold during incuba- unusual in that the males and females may have
tion. Overwintering is by immature larvae in the different ontogenies. The females of such species
parasitized mealybugs. Pupation occurs in the always develop as primary endoparasitoids of
spring. The adult emergence takes place in May mealybugs.
from the overwintering host nymphs.
Coccophagus gurneyi
13.2.1.3 Aphelinidae It is quite polyphagous and is native of Australia.
Along with Encyrtidae, this family provides It is a solitary internal parasitoid of all the
most of the biocontrol agents. Aphelinids are nymphal instars of Ps. fragilis, Ps. comstocki and
small, soft-bodied parasitic wasps, yellow or Ps. longispinus. Coccophagus gurneyi Compere
brown in colour and do not typically exceed has a complex developmental biology. The
1.5 mm in length. The larvae of the majority are female-producing eggs are laid free in the body
the primary parasitoids on mealybugs. They are uids of the mealybug, where they hatch in about
found throughout the world in virtually all habi- 4 days at 27 C. The larva develops in 10 days
tats and are extremely important as biological followed by a 2-day prepupal stage and an 11-day
control agents. With regard to their biology, pupal stage. The total duration goes up to 44
Aphelinidae more closely resemble Encyrtidae. days. The male-producing egg of the parasitoid is
Characters uniting the family Aphelinidae are not deposited in the developing larva of the female
apomorphic; that is, they are not uniquely parasitoid. It gave a good control of Ps. fragilis in
derived. The characters of Aphelinidae are com- South Africa and Chile.
plete notaular lines of the mesoscutum; trans-
verse or broad petiole (propodeum); long 13.2.1.4 Other Families
marginal; short stigma; and short or absent post- There are species belonging to the families
marginal wing veins; and third valvula distinctly Braconidae, Eucoilidae, Signiphoridae,
separated and articulated with third valvifer. Eulopidae and Pteromalidae that are known to
These character combinations might also serve to attack the mealybugs but are of minor importance
differentiate Aphelinidae from other families of (Table 13.2).
Chalcidoidea.
166 A.N. Shylesha and M. Mani

Table 13.2 List of some important encyrtid parasitoids of mealybugs


Parasitoid Mealybug
Hymenoptera, Encyrtidae Maconellicoccus hirsutus
Anagyrus kamali Moursi
Apoanagyrus (Epidinocarsis) lopezi (De Santis) Phenacoccus manihoti
Anagyrus ananatis Gahan Dysmicoccus brevipes
Hambletonia pseudococcina Compere D. brevipes
Anagyrus aegyptiacus Moursi Nipaecoccus viridis
Anagyrus dactylopii (Howard) M. hirsutus and N. viridis
Anagyrus pseudococci (Gir.) Planococcus citri
Anagyrus fusciventris (Girault) Pseudococcus longispinus
Anagyrus loecki Noyes and Menezes Paracoccus marginatus and Phenacoccus madeirensis
Anagyrus punctulatus Agarwal Saccharicoccus sacchari
Anagraphus sp. P. citri
Pseudectroma sp. Pseudococcus viburni
Acerophagus maculipennis (Mercet) Pseudococcus viburni
(Pseudaphycus maculipennis)
Acerophagus notativentris (Girault) Ps. longispinus
Arhopoideus peregrinus (Compere) Ps. longispinus
Anarhopus sydneyensis Timberlake Ps. longispinus
Leptomastidea abnormis (Girault) Pl. citri
Leptomastix dactylopii Howard Pl. citri
Leptomastix epona (Walker) Pseudococcus afnis and Spilococcus cactearum
Pseudleptomastrix mexicana Noyes and Schauff Pa. marginatus
Praleurocerus viridis (Agarwal) Rastrococcus iceryoides
Pseudaphycus phenacocci Yasnosh Phenacoccus mespili
Pseudaphycus utilis Timberlake Nipaecoccus nipae
Pseudaphycus malinus Gah. Ps. comstocki
Pseudaphycus angelicus (Howard) Pseudococcus maritimus
Acerophagus notativentris (Girault) Pseudococcus maritimus
Apoanagyrus (Epidinocarsis) lopezii De Santis Phenacoccus manihoti
Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes Rastrococcus invadens
Gyranusoidea indica Shafee, Alam and Agarwal M. hirsutus
Praleurocerus viridis (Agarwal) Rastrococcus icerioides
Acerophagus papayae Noyes and Schauff) Paracoccus marginatus
Aenasius bambawalei Hayat Penacoccus solenopsis
Aenasius advena Comp. F. virgata
Aenasius abengouroui (Risbec) Planococcus njalensis
Cheilonerus sp. M. hirsutus
Alamella ava (Agarwal) M. hirsutus
Tetracnemoidea indica Ayyar Planococcus lilacinus
Acroaspidia myrmicoides (Comp and Zinna) F. virgata
Blepyrus insularis (Camp.) F. virgata
Bothriocraera bicolor (Comp and Zinna) F. virgata
Chrysoplatycerus splendens How. F. virgata
Neodiscodes martini Comp. F. virgata
Neodusmetia sangwani (Subba Rao) Antonina graminis
(continued)
13 Natural Enemies of Mealybugs 167

Table 13.2 (continued)


Parasitoid Mealybug
Tananomastix abnormis Gir. F. virgata
Zarhopalus inquisitor How. F. virgata
Neodusmetia sangwani (Subba Ra) Antonina graminis
Rhopus nigroclavatus (Ashmead) Brevennia rehi
Leptomastix nigrocincta Risbec Coccidohystrix insoilta
Leptomastix nigrocoxalis Compere Coccidohystrix insoilta
Leptomastix epona (Walker). Spilococcus cactearum
Leptomastidea abnormis (Girault) Pl. citri
Leptomastix dactylopii How Pl. citri
Pseudleptomastrix mexicana Noyes and Schauff Pa. marginatus
Alamella ava Agarwal Pl. citri
Coccidoxenoides perminutus (Timberlake) Pl. citri
Platygasteridae Pl. citri
Allotropa citri Mues.
Alltropa japonica sp. nr M. hirsutus
Allotropa burrelli Mues. Pseudococcus comstocki
Allotropa utilis Mues. Phenacoccus aceris
Allotropa convexifrons Mues. Pseudococcus comstocki
Allotropa mecrida (Walker) M. hirsutus, P. citri
Leptacis sp. Pseudococcus sp.
Braconidae
Phanerotoma dentata (Panzer) M. hirsutus
Trioxys angelica Hal F. virgata
Eucoilidae M. hirsutus
Leptopilina sp.
Signiphoridae M. hirsutus
Chartocerus walkeri sp. nr.
Chartocerus spp. C. insolita
Aphelinidae M. hirsutus
Aphelinus sp.
Erioporus aphelinoides (Comp.) M. hirsutus
Coccophagus caridei (Brethes) Planococcus citri
Coccophagus sexvittatus Hayat Rastrococcus invadens
Coccophagus sexvittatus Hayat Rastrococcus iceryoides
Coccophagus gurneyi Comp. Ps. calceolariae
Coccophagus pseudococci Compere C. insolita
Eulopidae F. virgata
Syntomosphyrum zygaenarum Ferriere
Aprostocetus ajmerensis (Khan and Shafee) C. insolita
Pteromalidae F. virgata
Anysis alcocki Ashm.
Catolaccus crassiceps (Masi) C. insolita
168 A.N. Shylesha and M. Mani

13.3 Entomopathogens the mealybugs. Pathogenicity of many of the


pathogens have not been seen on mealybugs.
The wax cover and the secretion process are Some of the records might have resulted from
involved in mealybug defence against natural saprophytic growth on the dead mealybugs. A
enemies particularly the pathogens. Among the total of 13 pathogens were reported in different
microbes, only the entomopathogenic fungi are countries (Moore 1988).
recorded as causing natural infection against the Neozygites fumosa Speare was found to be a
mealybugs and these records are sparse and con- very important natural agent in regulating the
fused. The pathogens of the mealybugs appear to mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrer
be restricted as yet to the Zygomycotina and in Congo (Le Ru 1986). Development of epizoot-
Deutromycotina and the former to the class ics appeared to be inuenced by a relative humid-
Zygomycetes. The class contains two orders, ity of 90 % or more, minimum daily temperatures
namely Mucorales and Entomophthorales. greater than 20 C and the mealybug density.
Table 13.3 records a number of pathogens from Adult mealybugs are more susceptible than the

Table 13.3 List of entomopathogens and entomopathogenic nematodes recorded on mealybugs


Pathogens/nematodes Mealybugs
Entomopathogens
Fusarium pallidoroseum (Cooke) Sacc Phenacoccus solenopsis
Fusarium equiseti (Corda) Sacc Coccidohystrix insolita
Verticillium lecanii (Zimm.) Paracoccus marginatus
Lecanicillium (Verticillium) lecanii (Zimm.) Phenacoccus solenopsis, M. hirsutus
Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorokin Root mealybugs (Planococcus sp., Planococcus
citri, P. lilacinus, Dysmicoccus brevipes and
Ferrisia virgata
Metarhizium anisopliae Maconellicoccus hirsutus
Metarhizium sp. Dysmicoccus boninsis
Pseudomonas uorescens Migula Paracoccus marginatus
Beaveria bassiana (Bais-Criv) Vuill Paracoccus marginatus
Neozygites fumosa (Speare) P. citri, Phenacoccus sp., Phenacoccus manihoti
Cladosporium sp. Phenacoccus herreni Cox and William
Entomophthora fumosa Speare Planococcus citri
Entomophthora fresenii (Nowak.) P. citri, F. virgata, Nipaecoccus nipae
Aspergillus parasiticus Speare Saccharicoccus sacchari, Dysmicoccus boninsis,
Planococcoides njalensis (Laing)
Aspergillus fIavus Link Pseudococcus calceolariae (Maskell)
Dysmicoccus boninsis (Kuwana) Saccharicoccus
sacchari (Cockerell)
Cephalosporium sp. Planococcoides njalensis (Laing)
Cladosporium oxysporum Berk and M.A. Curtis Planococcus citri (Risso)
Conidiobolus pseudococci (Speare) Pseudococcus calceolariae
Hirsutella sphaerospora H.C. Evans and Samson Rastrococcus invadens
Entomopathogenic nematodes
Steinernema thermophilum Ganguly and Singh Phenacoccus solenopsis
Steinernema meghalayensis sp. n. Phenacoccus solenopsis
Steinernema riobrave Cabanillas, Poinar and Raulston Phenacoccus solenopsis
Steinernema harryi. sp. n. Phenacoccus solenopsis
Heterorhabditis zealandica Poinar Pseudococcus viburni
13 Natural Enemies of Mealybugs 169

immature mealybugs. Besides Neozygites cause 72 % reduction in the mealybug population


fumosa, the fungi that have been conrmed as (Pa. marginatus).
pathogenic to mealybugs are Hirsutella sphaero- Root mealybugs: Drenching of 3 % Neem
spora, Verticillium lecanii, Aspergillus parasiti- seed kernel extract (NSKE) and Verticillium leca-
cus and possibly Cladosporium oxysporum. nii Econil 7 g/L) was effective against the root
Entomophthora fumosa caused up to 58.1 % mealybugs (Smitha and Mathew 2010).
mortality of the third-instar nymphs and adult
Planococcus citri (Risso) in a period of high rain-
fall and humidity in the wet season in January 13.4 Entomopathogenic
(Murray 1978). The fungal pathogen Metarhizium Nematodes
anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorokin was found to cause
79.6 % reduction in the mealybug population, 30 Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) have
days after the treatment under laboratory condi- potential for biological pest control and have
tions (Devasahayam and Koya 2000). Beauveria been successfully used in several countries in soil
bassiana (Bals.) Vuill and Metarhizium aniso- and cryptic pest control. It is hypothesized that
pliae (Metschn.) Sorokn, Lecanicillium lecanii the rarity of infestation by nematodes is related to
(Zimm.) Zare and W. Gams and Isaria fumosoro- the wax shield. Stuart et al. (1997) found a varied
seus (Wize) were found pathogenic to susceptibility of Dysmicoccus vaccinii Miller and
Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green at 15 and Polavarapu to several nematode species; they
20 C. The fungus Beauveria bassiana (Bals.- showed that the removal of the waxy coating
Criv.) Vuill. was found to cause high mortality in from the mealybug did not inuence their suscep-
short time periods in adult females of the mealy- tibility to Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar.
bug Dysmicoccus texensis (Tinsley) (Andalo Heterorhabditis bacteriophora has been success-
et al. 2004). Fusarium pallidoroseum caused fully shown to kill mealybugs. Planococcus citri
8095 % mortality of Ph. solenopsis (Monga was found to be the most susceptible to
et al. 2010). The fungal pathogen Lecanicillium Steinernema yirgalemense and Heterorhabditis
(Verticillium) lecanii was found to be pathogenic zealandica, causing 97 % and 91 % mortality,
to Ph. solenopsis in Tamil Nadu (Banu et al. respectively.
2010). Cadavers of Ph. solenopsis infected with In Western Cape Province, South Africa, an
Fusarium pallidoroseum (Cooke) Sacc were col- isolate of Heterorhabditis zealandica, has
lected from Haryana and Punjab during 2007 resulted in mortality of Pseudococcus viburni
2010. In the laboratory, F. pallidoroseum caused (Signoret) up to 80 % after 48 h. All stages of P.
8095 % mortality of P. solenopsis (Monga et al. viburni beyond crawlers appeared to be suscepti-
2010). The fungal pathogen Lecanicillium ble to the nematode infection. Hence, the control
(Verticillium) lecanii was found to be pathogenic in the eld should take place when the intermedi-
to Ph. solenopsis in Tamil Nadu (Banu et al. ates and adults are most abundant (Stokwe and
2010). Malan 2010). In India, Steinernema thermophi-
In vitro application of Verticillium lecanii, lum caused 83 % mortality of the mealybug (Ph.
Beauveria bassiana, B. brongniartii and Solenopsis) within 72 h after inoculation at 50 IJ/
Metarhizium anisopliae at single dose (1 107 mL and 100 % within 48 h at 500 IJs/mL.
conidiospores/mL) against P. citri inicted a Steinernema riobrave and S. harryi n. sp. pro-
mortality of 91.1, 75.5, 66.6 and 45.3 %, respec- duced intermediate mortality of about 66 %
tively. Verticillium lecanii at ve doses (ranging within 60 h at 500 IJs/mL. Emergence was
from 1 105 to 1 109 conidiospores/mL) caused observed only in 16.6 % of the mealybug cadav-
a mortality of 45, 65, 80, 90 and 95 %, respec- ers infected with S. thermophilum and S. harryi
tively (Saranya 2008). Pseudomonas uorescens sp. nr. Entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema
Migula, a common Gram-negative, rod-shaped glaseri was also known to cause mealybug mor-
bacterium, as foliar application, was found to tality under laboratory conditions.
170 A.N. Shylesha and M. Mani

The nematode Steinernema carpocapsae Chong JH, Oetting RD (2007) Specicity of Anagyrus sp
nov nr. sinope and Leptomastix dactylopii for six
(Weiser) was found to cause high mortality in
mealybug species. Biocontrol 52:289308
short time periods in adult females of the mealy- Clancy DW (1944) Biology of Allotropa burrelli, a gre-
bug Dysmicoccus texensis (Tinsley) (Andalo garious parasite of Pseudococcus comctocki. J Agric
et al. 2004). The aqueous suspension of EPN Res 69:159167
Devasahayam S, Koya KMA (2000) Evaluation of ento-
(JPM3) was more efcient with 70 % control
mopathogenic fungi against root mealybug infesting
efciency on the root mealybug Dy. texensis black pepper. In: Abstracts, Entomocongress 2000,
(Alves et al. 2009). Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Association for Advancement of Entomology,
Poinar strain HC1 was known to cause 100 % Trivandrum, 58 Nov 2000, pp 3334
Devasahayam S, Koya KMA, Anandaraj M, Thomas T,
mortality in the inoculated coffee mealybug com-
Preethi N (2009) Distribution and bio-ecology of root
plex (Rodriguez et al. 1998). Dysmicoccus texen- mealybugs associated with black pepper (Piper
sis is an example for the coffee root mealybug. nigrum Linnaeus) in Karnataka and Kerala, India.
Greenhouse results demonstrate that the aqueous Entomon 34:147154
Dinesh AS, Venkatesha MV, Ramakrishna S (2010)
suspension (JPM3) was more efcient with 70 %
Development, life history characteristic and behaviour
control efciency. of mealybug predator Spalgis epeus (Westwood)
(Lepidoptra: Lycaenidae) on Planococcus citri (Risso)
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). J Pest Sci 83:339345
Gillani WA, Copland M, Raja S (2009) Studies on the
References feeding preference of brown lacewing (Sympherobius
fallax Navas) larvae for different stages of long-tailed
Alves VS, Moino Junior A, Santa-Cecilia LVC, Rohde C, mealy bug (Pseudococcus longispinus) (Targioni and
da Silva MAT (2009) Tests for the control of coffee Tozzetti). Pak Entomol 31(1):14
root mealybug Dysmicoccus texensis (Tinsley) Gilliat RC (1939) The life history of Allotropa utilis
(Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae) with Heterorhabditis Mues., a hymenopterous parasite of the orchard
(Rhabditida, Heterorhabditidae) [Portuguese]. Rev mealybug Nova Scotia. Can Entomol 1:160163
Bras Entomol 53(1):139143 Giordanengo P, Nenon JP (1990) Melanization and encap-
Andalo V, Moino Junior A, Santa-Cecilia LVC, Souza GC sulation of eggs and larvae of Epidinocarsis lopezi by
(2004) Compatibility of Beauveria bassiana with its host Phenacoccus manihoti effects of superpara-
chemical pesticides for the control of the coffee root sitism and egglaying patterns. Entomol Exp Appl
mealybug Dysmicoccus texensis Tinsley (Hemiptera: 56:155163
Pseudococcidae) [Portuguese]. Neotrop Entomol Herren HR, Neuenschwander P (1991) Biological control
33(4):463467 of cassava pests in Africa. Ann Rev Entomol
Banu JG, Suruliveru T, Amutha M, Gapalakrishnan N 36:257283
(2010) Susceptibility of cotton mealybug, Paracoccus Le Ru B (1986) Epizootiology of the entomophthoraceous
marginatus to entomopathogenic fungi. Ann Plant fungus Neozygites fumosa in a population of the cas-
Prot Sci 18(1):247248 sava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti (Hom,
Blumberg D (1997) Parasitoid encapsulation as a defense Pseudococcidae). Entomophaga 31:7989
mechanism in the Coccoidea (Homoptera) and its Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1989) Life cycle, host stage
importance in biological control. Biol Cont suitability and pesticide susceptibility of the grape
8:225236 mealybug parasitoid, Allotropa japonica sp n. J Biol
Blumberg D, Franco JC, Suma P, Russo A (2001) Control 3:79
Parasitoid encapsulation in mealybugs (Hemiptera: Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1990) Predation of Mallada
Pseudococcidae) as affected by the host-parasitoid boninensis on Ferrisia virgata, Planococcus citri and
association and superparasitism. Boll Zool Agr Bachic P lilacinus. J Biol Control 4:122123
SerII 33(3):385395 Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1991) Breeding of Blepyrus
Blumberg D, van Driesche RG (2001) Encapsulation rates insularis (Hym., Encyrtidae) on Ferrisia virgata
of three encyrtid parasitoids by three mealybug spe- (Hemip., Pseudococcidae). Entomon 16:275277
cies (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) found commonly Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1995) Inuence of different
as pests in commercial greenhouses. Biol Cont stages of oriental mealybug, Planococcus lilacinus
22:191199 (Ckll.) on the development, progeny production and
Calatayud PA, Polania MA, Seligmann CD, Bellotti AC sex ratio of the parasitoid, Tetracnemoidea indica
(2002) Inuence of water-stressed cassava on Ayyar. J Insect Sci 8(2):192193
Phenacoccus herreni and three associated parasitoids. Mani M, Thontadaraya TS (1987) Biological studies on
Entomol Exp Appl 102:163175 the grape mealybug predator Scymnus coccivora
(Ayyar). J Biol Control 1:8992
13 Natural Enemies of Mealybugs 171

Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A, Sivaraju C (1991) A wonder- Sagarra LA, Peterkin DD, Vincent C, Stewart RK (2000)
ful predator. Lambert Academic Publishing, Immune response of the hibiscus mealybug,
Deutschland, 310 p Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green (Homoptera:
Monga D, Kumhar KC, Kumar R (2010) Record of Pseudococcidae), to oviposition of the parasitoid
Fusarium pallidoroseum (Cooke) Sacc. on cotton Anagyrus kamali Moursi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae).
mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley. J Biol J Ins Physiol 46:647653
Control 24(4):366368 Saranya C (2008) Evaluation of biocontrol agents against
Moore D (1988) Agents used for biological control of Citrus mealybug Plannococcus citri. M.Sc thesis sub-
mealybugs (Pseudococcidae). Biocontrol News Inf mitted to Bharathidasn University, Tiruchirapalli
9:209225 Smitha MS, Mathew MP (2010) Management of root
Murray DAH (1978) Population studies of the citrus mealybugs, Geococcus spp. In banana cv Nendran.
mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso), and its natural Pest Manag Hortic Ecosyst 16(2):108119
enemies on passion-fruit in south-eastern Queensland. Stokwe NF, Malan AP (2010) Potential use of entomo-
Qld J Agric Anim Sci 35(2):139142 pathogenic nematodes for biological control of
Noyes JS, Hayat M (1994) Oriental mealybug parasitoids mealybugs on apples and pears. SA Fruit J 9(3):38
of the Anagyrini (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). CAB 39, 42
International, Oxon, 554 p Stuart RJ, Polavarapu S, Lewis EE, Gaugler R (1997)
Rodriguez I, de Martinez de los M, Sanchez L, Rodriguez Differential susceptibility of Dysmicoccus vaccinii
MG (1998) Field comparison of the effectiveness of (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) to entomopathogenic
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora strain HC1 for the con- nematodes (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae and
trol of mealybugs (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) on Steinernematidae). J Econ Entomol 90:925932
coffee [Spanish]. Rev Prot Veg 13(3):195198
Semiochemicals in Mealybugs
14
N. Bakthavatsalam

A semiochemical (from Greek semeon meaning 1978). In Italy, the sex pheromone released by
signal) is a generic term used for a chemical females of Planococcus citri (Risso) was
substance or mixture that carries a message for extracted from unmated females (Rotundo and
purpose of communication. Semiochemical com- Tremblay 1976). The identication of sex phero-
munication can be divided into two broad classes: mones of several mealybug species has facilitated
communication between individuals of the same the development of monitoring techniques and
species (intraspecic) or communication between management tactics based on these compounds.
different species (interspecic). It is usually used However, experience shows that the efciency of
in the eld of chemical ecology to encompass tactics such as mass trapping, mating disruption,
pheromones, allomones, kairomones, attractants, and lure and kill may be constrained by a lack of
and repellents. Many insects, including parasitic knowledge of basic features of the life history
insects, use semiochemicals, which are natural and mating behavior of male insects and the
chemicals released by an organism that affect the mechanisms involved in their interactions with
behaviors of other individuals. Pheromones are pheromone sources. A comprehensive account of
intraspecic signals that aid in nding mates, pheromones of coccoids was provided by
food and habitat resources, warning of enemies, Dunkelblum (1999) in the book Pheromones of
and avoiding competition. Interspecic signals Non-lepidoteran Insects.
known as allomones and kairomones have similar
functions.
The existence of female sex pheromone in a 14.1 Mealybug Pheromone
coccid, Matsucoccus resinosae Bean and Characteristics
Godwin, was rst demonstrated by Doane (1966),
followed by other coccid Aonidiella aurantii These pheromones all share a number of desir-
(Makell) (Tashiro and Chambers 1967). able characteristics and also some undesirable
Identication and synthesis of sex pheromone characteristics for use in pheromone trapping.
in A. aurantii became a turning point in the pher-
omone research for the coccoids (Roelofs et al. Sex pheromones are very powerful attractants
for male mealybugs. The males hide and live
in protected areas and are not harmed by the
N. Bakthavatsalam (*) insecticides. Using pheromones even small
National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Insects, populations can be detected at earlier stages of
Bangalore 560024, India occurrence.
e-mail: nbakthavatsalam@yahoo.com

Springer India 2016 173


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_14
174 N. Bakthavatsalam

The standard rubber septum-type pheromone pressure is high. When used in management
lures remain attractive for 23 months under systems, they are often combined with neonic-
eld conditions, minimizing the number of otinoids, insect growth regulators, or other
lure changes required throughout one season. biopesticides.
The lures require only a tiny dose of phero- Pheromone traps were used to determine, for
mone (0.025 mg or less), which will help to example, mealybug species composition,
keep lure manufacturing costs down. relative seasonal abundance, and density. In
The chemical structure of each pheromone is the vineyards infested with mixed mealybugs,
different; therefore, each pheromone speci- using traps activated with pheromones, it was
cally attracts only its own species. Sometimes found that Planococcus cus was more
in the orchards with more than one mealybug abundant than Planococcus citri in Italy (Ortu
species, pheromones could be combined to et al. 2006).
lure or to attract several species simultane- The ability of the pheromone control pro-
ously (Waterworth et al. 2011). grams to target a specic pest and not harm
Multi-season plastic Delta traps are sugested pollinator bees and benecial insects pays big
for monitoring and mass trapping most inva- dividends.
sive insect pests. This can also be an advantage and a disadvan-
Most pesticides require direct contact with the tage that mealybugs have been caught in traps
mealybug; hence, it will not be effective located over one quarter mile from the nearest
against those under the bark. Many of the known infestation.
softer insecticides are not able to penetrate The sensitivity of the multiplex polymerase
the waxy exterior; however, pheromones are chain reaction (PCR) to identify adult males
volatile molecules dispersed through the air collected in pheromone traps was shown, with
and sensed by the insect without requiring reliable identication of Pl. cus aged for 6
penetration-reach target spot. days in pheromone traps (Daane et al. 2011)
A possible alternative to visual sampling, which
may both decrease monitoring time and increase
the sensitivity of mealybug detection meth- 14.2 Techniques for Isolation
ods, is the use of pheromone-baited traps. of Pheromones
Specically, pheromone traps were more sensi-
tive than visual methods for detecting mealybug The pheromones of moths, due to their larger
infestations. The number of insects caught on size, were easily identied using the electrophys-
traps was correlated with mealybug abundance iological and analytical techniques; however, it is
in the eld indicating that pheromone traps difcult to identify the pheromones from mealy-
can be used in place of laborious, and annual bugs mainly due to their smaller size and avail-
sampling to monitor the mealybug populations. ability in lesser quantity of pheromones. Large
A second benet of the pheromone use over numbers of virgin females of mealybugs were
conventional broad-spectrum pesticides was required for the extraction of the female sex
that the ecological balance and natural preda- pheromone (Rotundo and Tremblay 1976). The
tor populations were preserved. Secondary large-scale production of mealybugs is done on
pest populations often surge later in the season potato sprouts or ripe pumpkins in several coun-
when broad-spectrum pesticides are used tries (Smith and Armitage 1920; Joshi et al. 2010;
because the pesticides kill natural predators Ahmad and Ghani 1970; Chacko et al. 1978).
of the primary pest, but with the use of phero- Behavioral attributes such as age of the calling
mones pest resurgence was contained. females and inuence of photo/scoto phases and
Vine mealybug pheromones are often inte- host plants complicate the process of pheromone
grated into pest management systems, particu- identication in mealybugs. For the isolation
larly for the rst several years when pest and identication of coccoid sex pheromones,
14 Semiochemicals in Mealybugs 175

continuous mass rearing of virgin females is might be the translucent pores on the hind legs
required, along with the sufcient numbers of coxae (metathoracic legs) (Gullan and Kosztarab
males for bioassays. Sexual separation of males 1997). The source of pheromone gland was sus-
was done either through the mechanical separa- pected to be the abdominal glands for several
tion using a water spray/brush or through the species of mealybugs. The pygidial glands were
application of juvenoids, which selectively pre- identied as the pheromone-producing glands,
vent male maturation. Pheromone production in the secretions of which are released through the
virgin females of Pseudococcus calceolariae was anus via a fragile duct. The production of phero-
not appreciably affected by the juvenile hormone mone and the response of the males to the phero-
treatment (Rotundo 1978). Compounds such as monal glands vary with the rearing conditions.
dichlorvos, triprene, RO 103108, etc. have been Feral mealybugs produce and respond to com-
used for the collection of females. pound 1, whereas lab-reared adults reared on
As a rst stage in research on the nature of potato sprouts produce and respond to both the
the female sex pheromone of the citrus pest compounds (Zada et al. 2003). For the collection
Pseudococcus calceolariae, a method was of pheromone, entrapment method using adsor-
described for collecting and extracting the phero- bent compounds such as tenax, Porapak Q or
mone from the air above virgin females reared on cold trapping was followed. The pheromone
potato sprouts in the laboratory; virgin females gland extracted with glacial acetic acid or abso-
sexed by insect growth regulators (which pre- lute ethanol was the most attractive pheromone
vented the development of males) and main- formulation for Planococcus citri (Hwang and
tained with or without food produced pheromones Chu 1987b). The plants that release volatiles
for about 16 days. Out of three absorbent materi- (such as lemon) need to be avoided as laboratory
als tested, Poropak Q proved to be the most effec- host to keep away the possible interference of
tive in absorbing the pheromone, which was these plant volatiles in the pheromone collection.
eluted from it with ethyl ether and concentrated Potato tubers or potato sprouts are considered to
by distillation or evaporation of the solvent in be the best rearing media for the collection of
nitrogen and the active fraction was subjected to pheromone.
gasliquid chromatography. All pheromone sam-
ples were evaluated by bioassay on the Poropak
in an olfactometer into which males were intro- 14.4 Behavior of Male Mealybugs
duced, or on lter paper in a petri dish containing
males (Rotundo et al. 1979a, b). In the course of The male mealybugs are known to y about one-
rearing Pseudococcus comstocki (Kuw.) on ripe half mile. The adult males usually respond to the
pumpkins in a laboratory in Japan, it was found pheromone gland secretions, and this was con-
possible to separate the sexes by the simple expe- rmed through electrophysiological and behav-
dient of wrapping the pumpkins on which the ioral studies. The daily rhythms of pheromone
mealybug was being reared in a double-folded production and the responsiveness of males were
sheet of tissue paper. Only the male nymphs very important. The males of P. citri were inac-
crawled into the paper. Adult males crawled out tive in scotophase but were very active for 30 min
from the papers and began to y soon after a after the beginning of photophase. However, the
lamp was lit (Negishi et al. 1980a). activity ceased after exposure to light. Besides
the adult males, immature stages of mealybugs
also respond to the pheromones of the female.
14.3 Pheromone Glands Second-instar nymphs of mealybugs (Pl. citri,
Ps. cryptus, N. viridis, and Pl. cus) responded to
The site of production and release of sex phero- the conspecic female sex pheromone directing
mones in female mealybugs have not yet been the males themselves to a suitable pupation site
determined, although it has been suggested that it near conspecic non-sibling mature females,
176 N. Bakthavatsalam

thus preventing in breeding. Male nymphs are Males of Pl. citri, Pl. cus, and Ps. comstocki are
not attracted to heterospecic female phero- morning iers, whose ight begins just after sun-
mones; the repellency of heterospecic sex pher- rise (Moreno et al. 1972, 1984; Ortu and Delrio
omones to males directed to look for a pupation 1982; da Silva et al.2009a, b, c; Zada et al. 2008);
site to avoid close contact with heterospecic males of Maconellicoccus hirsutus and
females (Mendel et al. 2003, 2012). Pheromotypes Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) y mainly
were also known to occur in Planococcus cus around sunset (Francis et al. 2007); and males of
(Signoret) (Kol-Maimon et al. 2010). The males Ps. calceolariae y both in the early morning and
of Pseudococcus calceolariae on citrus were able late afternoon (Rotundo and Tremblay 1976).
to move against the wind in a zigzag progression Moreno et al. (1984) suggested that the daily
(a klinotactic response), even in the absence of cycle of Pl. citri male ight activity is determined
pheromones. In still air, they responded to the by the scotophase period and its onset in response
pheromone source (a wad of cotton wool bearing to exposure to light. In light of the ndings of
100 u l of an ether extract of females), from Moreno et al. (1984) and O. Bar-Shalom and
within a radius of about 3 cm. In the presence of Z. Mendel (unpublished data), an endogenous
wind at the optimal speed (0.5 m/s) carrying the circadian rhythm, imprinted by the photoperiod,
pheromone, they moved directly toward the pher- may also be involved. Recently, Mendel et al.
omone source, even from a distance of over 1 m (2008) and da Silva et al. (2009a, b, c) studied
(a tropotactic response) (Rotundo et al. 1980). seven mealybug species of the genera
The turntable olfactometer method appeared to Planococcus, Pseudococcus, and Nipaecoccus to
be the most efcient to study the attractiveness of estimate for how long and at which physiological
the female sex pheromone of Planococcus citri age the mealybug males are sexually active.
to adult males. Forty 618-day-old females pro- Adult males take 3040 h to achieve sexual
vided a sufcient pheromone source, and red maturity before being able to y or to mate. Most
color sticky card was the most attractive. During mature males live for 23 days, during which
the scotophase, there was little ight by males; mating opportunities may be continuously avail-
they were attracted to the pheromone with an able, but searching for a mate by ight is limited
obvious peak within 30 min after the beginning to 24 h per day. The nding that mealybug
of the photophase. Male activity ceased 2 h after males appear to y only after exposure to day-
exposure to light (Hwang and Chu 1987b). The light suggests that visual cues also may be
responses of males to the extracted fractions involved in male ight and mate location.
showed that virgin females of both species Findings of recent experiments aimed at studying
Pseudococcus calceolariae and Planococcus the effects of the color and design of sticky traps
citri had no circadian rhythm of sexual activity baited with sex pheromone on male captures sup-
but emitted the pheromone consistently and con- port this hypothesis (Franco et al. 2008a). The
tinuously throughout the day until mated lack of simple eyes in apterous males of poly-
(Rotundo and Tremblay 1980). morphic species of mealybugs, such as S. sac-
chari (A 1968), is also an indirect evidence
that vision might be involved in male mealybug
14.5 Male Flight and Mate ight and mate location. As in other neococcoid
Location families, mealybug males typically have a pair of
dorsal and ventral simple eyes plus a pair of
In light of the pattern observed among the few smaller lateral ocelli (A 1968; Gullan and
species whose sex pheromones were identied, Kosztarab 1997). There is a lack of clear knowl-
mate location by mealybug males seems to rely edge about the functional aspects of this bizarre
mainly on chemical cues, that is, adult females of visual system. Duelli (1985) suggested that the
biparental mealybug species utilize sex phero- eyes in scale insect males are positioned in a
mones to attract males (Dunkelblum 1999). horizontal ring around the head because the
14 Semiochemicals in Mealybugs 177

males body axis is maintained almost vertical bug Pseudococcus viburni (Millar et al. 2005b),
during ight. The main purpose of the eyes would grape mealybug Pseudococcus maritimus
be to monitor the presence of females in conjuc- (Ehrhorn) (Figadre et al. 2007), passionvine
tion with pheromones. mealybug Planococcus minor (Maskell) (Ho
Unlike neotenic adult females, male mealy- et al. 2007), Japanese mealybug Planococcus
bugs are active iers, do not feed, and they live kraunhiae (Kuwana) (Sugie et al. 2008), long-
only a few days. The response of males of differ- tailed mealybug Pseudococcus longispinus
ent ages to a synthetic pheromone and virgin (Millar et al. 2009), Madeira mealybug,
females was tested. In the petri dish bioassay, Phenacoccus madeirensis Green (Ho et al. 2009),
class I males (up to 10 h after eclosion) and less citrophilous mealybug Planococcus calceolariae
than 20 % of class II males (1029 h after eclo- (Maskell) (El-Sayed et al. 2010) and Dysmicoccus
sion) responded to the pheromone or virgin grassii Leonardi (de Alfonso et al. 2012).
females. On the other hand, most of class III All known mealybug pheromones are mono-
males (29 or more hours after eclosion) showed a terpenoid esters, mostly of simple acids.
clear response. After eclosion, most P. citri males However, most of them are irregular non-head-
need to complete a period of sexual maturation of to-tail monoterpenoids, with unusual connections
at least 30 h before they can respond to the sex of two isoprene units (Millar and Midland 2007).
pheromone and mate. Without mating, the maxi- The majority of naturally occurring isoprenoid
mal lifespan of males was approximately 5 days compounds that have been identied have
and 50 % of males lived only up to 4.4 days 14,head-to-tail linkages between isoprenoid
(25.0 0.5 C). Most P. citri males have less than units, whereas most irregular terpenoids with
3 days to nd a receptive female and mate with non-head-to-tail linkages have been found in
her. However, since P. citri males only y within a members of the plant family Asteraceae (Rivera
period of approximately 4 h after sunrise, the total et al. 2001). Non-head-to-tail isoprenoid com-
effective time available for mate location by ight pounds are produced in three biosynthetic reac-
is only less than 12 h (da Silva et al. 2009a, b, c). tions, that is, cyclopropanation, branching, and
cyclobutanations (Thulasiram et al. 2008). Millar
and Midland (2007) suggested that terpenoid bio-
14.6 Identication/Isolation synthetic pathways in mealybugs are distinctly
of Pheromones different from the typical terpenoid pathways
found in other organisms, representing a variety
Using sophisticated analytical and bioassay of enzymes that can catalyze cyclizations and
instruments such as gas chromatographymass rearrangements. On this basis, and considering
spectral detector (GCMS), gas chromatography that mealybug endosymbionts are believed to be
electroantennogram detector (GCEAD), vibra- important to the nitrogen and sterol requirements
tional circular dichroism (VCD) spectroscopy, of their hosts and may play a role in physiologi-
and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spec- cal processes such as resistance to microbial
troscopy, the sex pheromones of some economi- pathogens or detoxication of plant secondary
cally important species of mealybugs have been compounds, we tend to speculate that these
identied and synthesized. These include the enzymes may originate, at least in part, from
Comstock mealybug Pseudococcus comstocki mealybug endosymbionts. Thus, for example, a
(Negishi et al. 1980b), citrus mealybug variety of symbionts associated with bark beetles
Planococcus citri (Bierl-Leonhardt et al. 1981), are capable of producing compounds that are
vine mealybug Planococcus cus Signoret used as pheromones. Spectroscopically, phero-
(Hinkens et al. 2001), citriculus mealybug mones have been isolated and identied from
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel (Arai et al. 2003), several species of mealybugs. A list of phero-
pink hibiscus mealybug Maconellicoccus hirsu- mones identied for several species is given in
tus (Green) (Zhang et al. 2004), obscure mealy- Table 14.1.
178

Table 14.1 Pheromone compounds identied from different species of mealybugs


Sl. No. Species Chemical identied Identication reference Synthesis references
1 Crisicoccus matsumotoi 3-methyl-3-butenyl-5-methyl-hexanoate Tabata et al. (2012) Tabata et al. (2012)
(Siraiwa)
2 Maconellicoccus hirsutus Trans-1R,3R-chrysanthemyl (R)-2-methyl Zhang et al. (2004) Zhang et al. (2004); Zhang and Nie (2005)
(Green) butanoate and (R) lavandulyl (R) methyl
butanoate (93:1)
(R)-2-isopropenyl-5-methyl-4-hexenyl Zhang and Nie (2005)
(S)-2-methylbutanoate [common name is
(R)-lavandulyl (S)-2-methylbutanoate] and
[(R)-2,2-dimethyl-3-(1-methylethylidene)
cyclobutyl]methyl (S)-2-methylbutanoate
[which we refer to as (R)-maconelliyl
(S)-2-methylbutanoate
3 Phenacoccus madeirensis Trans (1R,3R)-chrysanthemyl (R)-2-methyl- Ho et al. (2009)
Green butanoate and (R)
lavandyly(R-methylbutanoate
4 Planococcus citri (Risso) (+)-(1R)-cis-2,2,-dimethyl 3-isopropenyl Bierl-Leonhardt et al. Kukovinets et al. (2006); Zada et al. (2004); Passaro and
cyclobutane methanol acetate (1R,3R) (1981, 1982) Webster (2004); Chibiryaev et al. (1991); Odinokov et al.
3-isopropenyl-2,2-dimethyl cyclobutane (1991); Serebryakov et al. (1986); Wolk et al. (1986);
methyl acetate Odinokov et al. (1984a, b); Carlsen and Odden (1984);
Bierl-Leonhardt et al. (1981)
5 Planococcus minor E-2-isopropyl-5-methyl-2-hexadienyl acetate Ho et al. (2007) Millar (2008); Ho et al. (2007)
(Maskell)
6 Planococcus cus S-lavandulol and (S)-(+)-lavandyl senecioate Hinkens et al. (2001); Ujita and Saeki (2008); Zada and Dunkelblum (2006);
(Signoret) Zada et al. (2001); Zada and Harel (2004); Zada et al. (2003), Millar et al.
Zada et al. (2003) (2002), Hinkens et al. (2001)
7 Pseudococcus comstocki R-3-acetoxy,2,6-dimethyl-1,5,-heptadiene Negishi et al. (1980b) McCullough et al. (1991); Baeckstroem and Li (1990);
(Kuwana) 2,6-dimethyl-1,5-heptadien-3-yl acetate Bichina et al (1982) Kang and Park (1990); Skatteboel and Stenstroem (1989);
Larcheveque and Petit (1989); Fall et al. (1986);
Baeckstrom et al. (1984); Nakagawa and Mori (1984);
Bierl-Leonhardt et al. (1982); Mori and Ueda (1981);
Uchida et al. (1981)
N. Bakthavatsalam
Sl. No. Species Chemical identied Identication reference Synthesis references
14

8 Pseudococcus cryptus (1R3R)-3-isopropenyl-2-2- Arai et al. (2003) Nakahata et al. (2003)


Hempel dimethmylcyclobutylmethyl-3-methyl-3-
butenoate
9 Pseudococcus Chrysamthemyl 2-acetoxy-3-methylbutanoate Unelius et al. (2011); Unelius et al. (2011); El-Sayed et al. (2010)
calceolariae (Maskell) El-Sayed et al. (2010)
10 Pseudococcus maritimus (R, R)-trans-(3,4,5,5-tetramethyl cyclopent-2- Figadre et al. (2007) Figadre et al. (2007)
(Ehrhorn) en-1-yl) methyl 2-methyl propanoate
11 Pseudococcus viburni (1R,2R,3S)-(2,3,4,4-tetramethyl cyclopentyl)- Millar et al. (2005b) Hashimoto et al. (2008); Millar and Midland (2007)
(Signoret) methyl acetate
12 Pseudococcus kraunhiae 2-isopropylidene-5-methyl-4-hexen-1-yl Sugie et al. (2008)
(Kuwana) butyrate
Semiochemicals in Mealybugs

13 Pseudococcus longispinus 2-(1,5,5-trimethylcyclopent-2-en-1-yl)ethyl Millar et al. (2009) Millar et al. (2009)


(Targioni Tozzetti acetate
14 Planococcus minor 2-isopropyl-5-methyl-2,4-hexadienyl acetate Ho et al. (2007) Ho et al. (2007)
(Maskell)
15 Dysmicoccus grassii ()-(R)-lavandulyl propionate and acetate de Alfonso et al. (2012)
Leonardi
179
180 N. Bakthavatsalam

14.6.1 Planococcus citri 14.6.3 Planococcus kraunhiae

In Italy, the sex pheromone released by females A sex pheromone component of the Japanese
of Planococcus citri was extracted from unmated mealybug, Planococcus kraunhiae was isolated
females by ethanol, diethyl ether, or petroleum and identied. A crude extract of the pheromone
ether. Extracts in ethanol, diethyl ether, or petro- obtained by airborne collection was rst fraction-
leum ether placed on lter paper or hydrophilized ated with Florisil column chromatography. The
poly(methyl methacrylate) discs elicited high active fraction was further puried by HPLC, and
attraction and pairing responses in the males an active component was isolated by preparative
(Rotundo and Tremblay 1976, 1982). P. citri GC. The purified compound was determined
pheromone is a cyclobutane compound. to be 2-isopropylidene-5-methyl-4-hexen-1-yl
butyrate by GCMS and NMR analyses showing
the attraction activity to adult males of P.
14.6.2 Pseudococcus calceolariae kraunhiae in the eld (Sugie et al. 2008).

Headspace volatiles collected from virgin


females of the citrophilous mealybug, Ps. calceo- 14.6.4 Planococcus cus
lariae, containing the main female-specic
compound is identied as [2,2-dimethyl-3-(2- The existence of pheromones was detected in the
methylprop-1-enyl)cyclopropyl]methyl 2-ace- females of mealybugs Planococcus cus
toxy-3-methylbutanoate (chrysanthemyl (Signoret) by Rotundo and Tremblay (1982). The
2-acetoxy-3-methylbutanoate). The other two sex pheromone of Planococcus cus has been
compounds are identied as [2,2-dimethyl-3-(2- identied as a single component, (S)-lavandulyl
methylprop-1-enyl)cyclopropyl]methanol (chry- senecioate (LS) 2a. Males were equally attracted
santhemol) and [2,2-dimethyl-3-(2-methylprop to either (S)-2a or racemic 2a, indicating that the
-1-enyl)cyclopropyl]methyl 2-hydroxy-3-meth- unnatural enantiomer does not inhibit male behav-
ylbutanoate (chrysanthemyl 2-hydroxy-3-methyl ioral responses. Female mealybugs also produced
butanoate). Traps baited with 100 g and 1,000 (S)-lavandulyl, but mixtures of racemic 1 with
g indicated that 100 g of chrysanthemyl 2-ace- racemic 2a were less attractive to male mealybugs
toxy-3-methylbutanoate captured 4- and 20-fold than racemic 2a alone. In eld trials, lures loaded
more males than traps baited with virgin females with 100 g doses of racemic 2a attracted males
(El-Sayed et al. 2010). The absolute congura- for at least 12 weeks (Millar et al. 2005a).
tion of the sex pheromone of Pseudococcus
calceolariae was determined to be (1R,3R)-[2,2-
dimethyl-3-(2-methylprop-1-enyl)cyclopropyl] 14.6.5 Phenacoccus madeirensis
methyl (R)-2-acetoxy-3-methylbutanoate NMR,
derivatization reactions, chiral GCMS, and com- Two compounds in Ph. madeirensis Green were
parison with synthetic chiral reference com- identied as trans-1R, 3R-chrysanthemyl (R)-2-
pounds were used to determine the absolute methyl butanoate and (R) lavandulyl (R)-methyl
conguration of this compound. Traps baited butanoate in a ratio of 3:1. The structures of two
with 1,000 g of the pheromone compound pheromones differ signicantly.
caught 367 times more males than traps baited
with virgin females. A mixture of stereoisomers
of pheromones can be used for eld trapping 14.6.6 Pseudococcus comstocki
without adverse effects on trap catches (Unelius
et al. 2011). Pseudococcus comstocki pheromone is an aliphatic
acetate. The sex pheromone produced by females
of the Ps. comstocki Kuwana, was isolated and
14 Semiochemicals in Mealybugs 181

identied as 2,6-dimethyl-3-acetoxy-1,5-hepta- Captures of male M. hirsutus showed that phero-


diene. Synthetic pheromone showed a potent mone with the naturally occurring (R)-maconelliyl
activity in laboratory bioassay and eld test (S)-2-methylbutanoate and (R)-lavandulyl (S)-2-
(Negishi et al. 1980b). methylbutanoate [R-S conguration] was most
attractive and that pheromone with the unnatural
S-S conguration was less attractive. An inhibi-
14.6.7 Pseudococcus maritimus tory effect was observed when R-R and S-R were
combined with naturally occurring R-S blend.
In Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrhorn), an irregu- Thus, S conguration on the acid moiety elicits
lar non-head-to-tail monoterpenoid was identi- attraction, whereas the R conguration induces
ed as (R,R)-1-trans 3,4,5,5,-tetramethyl inhibition. However, the attractive activity shows
cyclopenta-2-en-1-yl) methyl-2-methyl propi- some degree of tolerance toward chirality change
onoate (Figadere et al. 2007) and Zou et al. in the alcohol portion of the pheromone molecules
(2010) observed that racemic mixture of trans- (Zhang et al. 2006).
alphanecrodyl isobutyrate is more attractive than
(RR) or (SS) enantiomers.
14.6.11 Planococcus minor

14.6.8 Pseudococcus longispinus The sex pheromone of the mealybug, Planococcus


minor, was isolated by fractionation of crude
The sex pheromone of the long-tailed mealybug pheromone extract obtained by aeration of virgin
Ps. longispinus, identied as 2-(1,5,5-trimethylc females. The pheromone was identied as the
yclopent-2-en-1-yl)ethyl acetate, represents the irregular terpenoid, 2-isopropyl-5-methyl-
rst example of a new monoterpenoid skeleton. 2,4-hexadienyl acetate, by mass spectrometry,
A [2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement was used in a microchemical tests, and (1)H NMR spectros-
key step during construction of the sterically con- copy. The stereochemistry of the pheromone was
gested tetra alkyl cyclopentene framework assigned as (E) by comparison with synthetic
(Millar et al. 2009). standards of known geometry. The compound
was highly attractive to males in laboratory bio-
assays, whereas the (Z)-isomer appeared to
14.6.9 Crisicoccus matsumotoi antagonize attraction (Ho et al. 2007).

Most of the mealybug pheromones are carboxyl


esters of monoterpene alcohols; however, a hemi- 14.6.12 Pseudococcus viburni
terpene pheromone (3)-methyl-3-butenyl 5 meth-
ylhexanoate was identied from Crisicoccus The sex pheromone of the obscure mealybug, Ps.
matsumotoi (Siraiva) (Tabata et al. 2012). viburni, consists of (1R*,2R*,3S*)-(2,3,4,4-
tetramethylcyclopentyl)methyl acetate, the rst
example of a new monoterpenoid structural motif
14.6.10 Maconellicoccus hirsutus in which the two isoprene units forming the car-
bon skeleton are joined by 22 and 34 con-
The two chiral centers in the sex pheromone of nections rather than the usual 14 head-to-tail
pink hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsu- connections. This highly irregular terpenoid
tus, could elicit different male responses. The chi- structure, and the irregular terpenoid structures of
ral center in the acid moiety of the pheromone related mealybug species, suggests that these
seemed to be more critical than the alcohol portion insects may have unique terpenoid biosynthetic
of the pheromone molecule for attractiveness. pathways (Millar et al. 2005b).
182 N. Bakthavatsalam

14.6.13 Dysmicoccus grassii cated and expensive than that of racemic


compounds but, fortunately, racemic pheromones
In Dysmicoccus grassii, a main pest of Canary can be used because the unnatural stereoisomers
Islands banana, the principal components have no behavioral effect and, therefore, are
()-(R)-lavandulyl propionate and acetate in a benign (Zada et al. 2008). A unique case is the
6:1 ratio were identied by volatile collection pheromone of M. hirsutus; it contains a chiral
and GCMS analysis from aeration of virgin acid function that must have the correct chirality
females. (R)-lavandulyl propionate induced a for biological activity (Zhang and Amalin 2005;
stronger attractive effect when compared with Zhang et al. 2006). The passionvine mealybug is
(R)-lavandulyl acetate (de Alfonso et al. 2012). strongly inhibited by the (Z)-stereoisomer of its
Although the males of several mealybug spe- pheromone, suggesting that this compound may
cies are attracted to the females, sex pheromones be the pheromone of a related sympatric species
are yet to be identied (e.g., Phenacoccus herreni (Millar 2008). Unlike moths and beetles, which
(Cox&Williams)). are generally sensitive to isomers (structural and
chemical) of their pheromone components,
mealybugs are less sensitive to stereoisomers. In
14.7 Synthesis of Pheromones/ practice, this means that the use of mixture of iso-
Pheromone Production mers of the pheromone will be effective for con-
trolling most of the mealybug pheromones.
14.7.1 Pheromone Production Moreover, mealybugs are responsive to small
amounts (doses of about 1 mg) of the phero-
Pheromones must be isolated, identied, and mones (Millar et al. 2005b; Zhang and Amalin
synthesized before any basic or practical studies 2005; Sugie et al. 2008), so that potentially it is
can be performed. Entomologists and chemists possible to achieve pheromone-based control at
must cooperate closely in order to achieve these relatively low costs. Not all the mealybug sex
goals. Despite the availability of modern analyti- pheromones are commercially available. In fact,
cal equipment, the identication of natural most of them, except for those of the citrus
mealybug sex pheromones remains a difcult mealybug and the vine mealybug, are synthe-
and laborious task. Mealybugs are small or tiny sized only for research in small (milligram)
insects that release minute quantities of phero- quantities. The citrus mealybug pheromone, for
mone; therefore large numbers must be reared, example, which has a rather complex structure,
and often tedious separation of virgin females has been synthesized via a variety of routes, but it
must be done to collect sufcient amounts of still is not available in large quantities (hundreds
pheromone for isolation and identication. Males of grams) required for mating disruption. At
having a short lifespan of at most a few days are present, only commercial lures for monitoring
required for bioassay, either by attraction tests or are available. Because of the worldwide eco-
by GCEAG (gas chromatography electroanten- nomic importance of the mealybugs, there is a
nography). All known mealybug pheromones are need to improve the efciency of pheromone
monoterpenoid esters, mostly of simple acids. synthesis and to make the pheromone available
Unlike moth sex pheromones, the mealybug for control application. A series of analogs of this
pheromones are not homologous compounds; pheromone was prepared, in order to nd a less
their structures vary signicantly, and three types expensive attractant (Liu et al. 1995; Dunkelblum
of structures have been found so far: open chain et al. 1987), but most of them were insufciently
esters, cyclobutane derivatives, and cyclopentane attractive, except for a homologue in which a
rings. All mealybug pheromones, except the Pl. cyclobutaneethanol moiety replaced the cyclobu-
minor and Pl. kraunhiae pheromones, are chiral tanemethanol moiety in the natural pheromone.
compounds. Generally, enantioselective synthe- The homologue displayed about 40 % attractive-
sis of chiral compounds is much more compli- ness as compared with the pheromone, and in
14 Semiochemicals in Mealybugs 183

some eld tests it was as active as the latter (1R cis-3-isopropenyl-2-2-dimthyl cyclobutane
(Dunkelblum et al. 1987). The advantage of the methyl acetate) was found to attract males effec-
homolog is that its synthesis is easier and less tively (Dunkelblum et al. 1986). Alcohol analogue
expensive than that of the pheromone. Some (1R-cis)-3-isopropenyl-2-2-
pheromone analogs of the Comstock mealybug, dimethycyclobuanemethal) was an effective
Pseudococcus comstocki Kuwana, were also syn- attractant to P. citri, and homologue (1R-cis)-3-
thesized and tested in the eld (Uchida et al. isopropeny-2,2 dimethyl cyclobutane ethylacetate
1981; Bierl-Leonhardt et al. 1982). 2,6-dimethyl- at 2,000 g per dispenser was equal to 500 g
1,5-heptadien-3-yl acetate and three of its ana- pheromone (Dunkelblum et al. 1986). Analogue
logues of the sex pheromone of Pseudococcus of pheromone of P. citri, (+)-(1R)-cis-2-2-
comstocki (Kuw.), a pest of agricultural crops dimethyl-3-isopropenyl cyclobutano methanol
including apple and pear, were synthesized and acetate was synthesized using starting material cis-
evaluated for their attractiveness to males. All pinoic acid or cis-pinonic aldehyde, which were
four compounds were found to be the effective obtained from cheap -pinene and conversion of
attractants for the insect, but the synthetic sex the pinonic derivatives to pinononic derivatives
pheromone showed a two- to seven fold higher was achieved through Hundsdiecker reaction.
activity than the analogues (Uchida et al. 1981). Pinononyl aldehyde was used for synthesis of
pheromone through Wittig reaction (Dunkelblum
et al. 2002). Structural analogue of (+) cis-
14.7.2 Synthesis of Pheromones (1R)-(3)-isopropenyl-2-2-dimethyl cyclobutane
methyl acetate, the sex pheromone of P. citri, was
Through modications of acetoxy group, several synthesized and eld-tested in grapefruit orchards
pheromone analogues were synthesized for and the most active analogue was (+)-(cis-(1R)-
different species of mealybugs. A synthetic 2-(3-iso-propenyl-2-dimethyl cyclobutane ethyl
pheromone would provide a much more econom- acetate (Dunkelblum et al. 1987).
ical, convenient, and useful survey tool. Synthesis
of pheromone compounds of Pl. minor, Pl. citri, 14.7.2.2 Maconellicoccus hirsutus
and Ps. viburni was done successfully (Millar The sex pheromone of M. hirsutus, Maconelliol,
2008; Ho et al. 2007; Kukovinets et al. 2006; was synthesized in steps from Alpha pinene, and
Millar and Midland 2007). the key step was the dehydration of steps 57
through the intermediate 6 (Zhang et al. 2004).
14.7.2.1 Planococcus citri
The mealybug sex pheromones that have been 14.7.2.3 Pseudococcus viburni
identied generally are complex molecules, An improved diastereoselective synthesis of
which are relatively difcult to synthesize on a (1R*,2R*,3S*)-1-acetoxymethyl-2,3,4,4-
large scale. Nevertheless, because male mealy- tetramethylcyclopentane 1, the sex pheromone of
bugs are so exquisitely sensitive to the phero- Pseudococcus viburni, was described and the key
mone, with lures containing only a few step was diastereoselective catalytic hydrogena-
micrograms remaining active for at least several tion of the tetrasubstituted double bond in
months under eld conditions, widespread use of 2,3,4,4-tetramethyl-cyclopent-2-enone 4 to give
pheromone-baited traps for monitoring mealy- the thermodynamically less favored cis-2,3,4,4-
bugs is economically feasible. For example, 1 g tetramethyl-cyclopentanone 3a (Zou and Millar
of racemic pheromone is sufcient to prepare 2011). The pheromone of P. viburni was also syn-
50,000 lures or more @20 g per lure. thesized from pentalactone (Hajare et al. 2010).
In Pl. citri, (1R,3R)-3-isopropenyl-2,2- In the obscure mealybug Ps. viburni,
dimethylcyclobutanemethyl acetate (C12H20O2) 2,3,4,4-tetramethylcyclopentyl)methyl acetate
was identied, and a simple synthesis path was was identied as the sex pheromone. The active
developed in Israel, and the synthesized material compound has a number of isomers, and all were
184 N. Bakthavatsalam

made to conclusively verify the identity of the traps baited with virgin females. A mixture of
insect-produced compound. An efcient synthe- stereoisomers of the pheromone compound can
sis of the active compound, capable of being be used for eld trapping without adverse effects
scaled up to produce multigram quantities, was on trap catch (Unelius et al. 2011).
then developed. The pheromone was eld-tested
in California vineyards and nurseries, and by col- 14.7.2.5 Pseudococcus longispinus
laborators in South America and New Zealand. A single compound was unique to the headspace
The pheromone is extraordinarily active, with of the sexually mature female Ps. longispinus.
lures loaded with sub-milligram quantities The rst reported synthesis involves a polyphos-
remaining attractive to male mealybugs for sev- phoric acid-mediated cyclization of isobutyl
eral months. In South Africa, The sex pheromone 2-butenoate. The cyclopentenone was then con-
for P. viburni was recently identied and synthe- verted into the allylstannane after being reduced.
sized in South Africa. There was a positive and A short and efcient synthesis of the mealybug
signicant relationship between the fruit infesta- pheromone was developed from readily available
tion and number of P. viburni adult males caught iodoketone with an overall yield of 21 %. The
in pheromone-baited traps (r2 = 0.454, P < 0.001) pheromone has been shown to have extremely
in pome orchards. The action threshold level was high biological activity; in lures, just 25 g of the
estimated to be 2.5 male P. viburni caught per racemic pheromone can attract males for more
trap per fortnight at an economic threshold of 2 than 3 months (Bakonyi 2012). The synthesis
% fruit infestation. This monitoring method was of a recently identied and highly active sex
less labor-intensive, more accurate, and quicker pheromone of Ps. longispinus, was reported by
than the current visual sampling and monitoring Kurhade et al. (2013).
techniques (Mudavanhu et al. 2011).
14.7.2.6 Pseudococcus comstocki
14.7.2.4 Pseudococcus calceolariae The synthesis of the acetate of
Traps baited with 1001,000 g of racemic chry- 2,6-dimethylhepta-1,5-dien-3-olthe sex phero-
santhemyl 2-acetoxy-3-methylbutanoate cap- mone of the Comstock bughas been carried out
tured 420-fold more males than traps baited by condensing isobutenyl lithium with
with virgin females. In Chile, a single dose of 3,4-epoxy-2-methylbut-1-ene and acetylating
100 g was known to capture 1,171 males, the 2,6-dimethylhepta-1,5-dien-3-ol formed. The
whereas none were captured in control traps. An overall yield of pheromone was 46 % (Ishchenko
isomeric mixture of synthetic 3 proved to be et al. 1989). The synthesis of racemic versions of
highly attractive to male mealybugs in the eld in pheromones of Ps. comstocki was done through
New Zealand and in Chile. Male mealybugs were reductive lithiation of allyl phenyl thioesters
highly attracted to the racemic material and this followed by transmetallation, producing allylme-
will greatly facilitate the development of the tallics, which react selectively with carbonyl
pheromone for monitoring and control of this compounds at the most on least-substituted ter-
pest, because racemic 3 can be readily synthe- minus and the latter results in cis-olen
sized from commercially available intermediates (McCullough et al. 1991).
(El-Sayed et al. 2010). This activity of 1R,3R)-
[2,2-dimethyl-3-(2-methylprop-1-enyl)cyclopro-
pyl]methyl (R)-2-acetoxy-3-methylbutanoate in 14.8 Commercial Development
Pseudococcus calceolariae was further conrmed of Pheromones
by testing synthetic stereoisomers of the com-
pound as lures in traps for adult male mealybugs. Currently, of these seven pheromones, only the
Traps baited with 1,000 g of the pheromone vine mealybug Pl. cus pheromone is commer-
compound caught 36 times more males than cially available, but Millar is working to transfer
14 Semiochemicals in Mealybugs 185

the manufacturing technology to companies that Place the rubber septum containing the phero-
produce pheromone products. None of the phero- mone (lure) inside the trap on top of the sticky
mones are protected by patents; therefore, all are coating on the bottom panel.
freely available for the commercial development.
Companies also need to know that there is a sub- 14.9.1.2 Trap Placement
stantial market for these products, so growers Tie the trap to the plant at 23 feet above
should communicate their needs to company rep- ground level. Traps baited with virgin
resentatives to expedite the entry of mealybug Pseudococcus comstocki females, placed in
pheromone traps into the market place. Ps. comstocki-infested fruitless mulberry
Chemist Aijun Zhang in Beltsville, MD, trees about 9 ft above ground level, had
developed the pheromone of M. hirsutus, which caught an average of 225 Ps. comstocki
mimics the female mealybugs scent, according males compared with 6 ft by each of the
to a news release. South Carolina Scientic Inc., other traps (Moreno et al. 1972). Make sure
of Columbia, SC, will market the chemical. The leaves and shoots are not obstructing the
sex pheromone, placed inside sticky traps, effec- entrance into the trap. Do not hang it too low
tively monitors and traps male mealybug. By lur- or too high in the canopy.
ing males to traps, the pheromone would provide Place the trap at the center of the block for
a much more useful detection tool. Relatively surveying the largest area possible.
high concentrations of the pheromone repel
males away from the source, disrupting mating. 14.9.1.3 Labeling Traps
However, natural enemies of the mealybug are Label the trap with the block name and
not attracted to the scent, so biological control row number, where the trap was placed
would not be compromised (http://www.the- and the dates it was set out in the field and
grower.com/news/rm_to_market_pink_mealy- removed.
bug_ pheromone_117886474.html#sthash. Label the outer side of the trap with the fol-
2KIGfvcv.dpuf). Commercial lures of Ps. longis- lowing information: date of placement (DOP),
pinus and Ps. maritimus also became available vineyard and block name, row and vine num-
from Suterra LLC (Bend, OR) in 2010. ber, and lure (L) type. When you remove the
trap, write the date of removal (R). Use a per-
manent marker.
14.9 Traps
14.9.1.4 Trap Density
Pheromone traps can attract the mealybugs Place one trap per hectare or one per smaller
within one-quarter mile from the trap site. orchard.

14.9.1.5 Trapping Season


14.9.1 Trapping Guidelines Placement of traps based on the information
gathered on the seasonal activity more
14.9.1.1 Trap Assembly closely in the locality. In California, place-
Obtain or purchase a red Delta trap, preferably ment of traps begins in late March to June
with a white sticky bottom panel for ease of (depending on region) and trapping is con-
viewing mealybugs. tinued through October or until the rst rain
Assemble the trap by folding in the side edges in vineyards.
to reduce the size of the openings.
186 N. Bakthavatsalam

14.9.1.6 Checking Traps bugs in mulberry ecosystem (Bichina et al. 1982).


Check traps every 2 weeks for the presence of Pheromone-baited traps with larger trapping sur-
mealybugs on the sticky surface. faces (green Delta, Pherocon IIB, and Pherocon
V) captured more males of Maconellicoccus hir-
14.9.1.7 Trap Replacement sutus per trap than those with smaller surfaces
Replace the trap when it becomes soiled. (Jackson and Storgard Thinline), and fewest
Lures are effective for a maximum of 8 weeks. males were captured by Storgard Thinline traps.
If no male mealybugs are found, new pheromone However, Jackson traps captured as many or
lures can be placed into old traps. Do not for- more males per square centimeter of trapping
get to re-label the new trap and note when new surface than those with larger surfaces, and the
lures are placed in the trap. time required to count males in Jackson traps was
signicantly less than in green Delta, Pherocon
IIB, and Pherocon V traps. Although all trap
14.9.2 Types of Traps designs accumulated some debris and nontarget
insects, it was rated as light to moderate for all
Multi-season plastic Delta traps are used for designs. The Jackson trap is most suitable for
monitoring and mass trapping the mealybugs. monitoring M. hirsutus populations. In addition,
These Delta traps areresistant to severe weather unlike the other traps evaluated, which must be
conditions. They are very easy to assemble and replaced entirely or inspected in the eld and
collapse at for storage. Hwang and Chu (1987a) then redeployed, only the sticky liners of Jackson
developed an effective, cylindrical, and transpar- traps require replacement, enhancing the ef-
ent plastic trap (diameter 8 cm and length 8 cm) ciency of trap servicing (Vitullo et al. 2007).
with white sticky card (8 12.5 cm) inserted at Adhesive traps, baited with virgin females of
the bottom, and traps placed at 100 cm and above Maconellicoccus hirsutus and placed on hibis-
caught more than 50 % of males. Commercially cus, captured more males than did unbaited traps
developed traps with more surface such as green (Serrano et al. 2001).
Delta, Pherocon IIB, and Pherocon V captured The color of the pheromone trap inuenced
more males than other traps (Vitullo et al. 2007). the numbers of males of Pseudococcus comstocki
Delta sticky traps, baited with 50 or 200 g of LS (Kuw.) caught. Multi-season plastic Delta traps
were used to determine the daily ight pattern are available in red and white. Generally, yellow
and the seasonal ight activity including vine traps with sticky surfaces were effective in trap-
plant infestation for P. cus (Zada et al. 2008). A ping males. Pheromone traps baited with green
method is described for handling sticky trap Delta, Pheroxin IIB, and Pherocon V trapped
cards and evaluating catches, using the sex pher- more males in Maconellicoccus hirsutus.
omones of Planococcus citri and Pseudococcus Moreover, Jackson traps captured more adults
comstocki (Fargerlund and Moreno 1974). In per square centimeter (Vitullo et al. 2007). The
USA and Japan, 2,6-dimethyl-1,5-heptadien-3-yl color preference was red = dark
acetate was identied in Ps. comstocki and a syn- green = black > green > yellow > white. According
thetic material was prepared in the Moldavian to Hwang and Chu (1987a, b), red color sticky
area of the USSR. The sticky traps proved very cards are the most attractive to the males of
successful in attracting and catching male mealy- Planococcus citri.
14 Semiochemicals in Mealybugs 187

Triangular tent-shaped Yellow trap Yellow traps

14.10 Pheromone-Based damage. Monitoring for mealybug infestation is


Management Tactics quite labor intensive as mealybugs are often
located in the protected areas of plants like bark
Sex pheromones of insects, including mealybugs, crevices and leaf axils. Pheromone traps may be
are natural compounds emitted by virgin females used as an early warning tool for grape growers
in order to attract conspecic males for mating. to monitor mealybug activity and to detect the
The sex pheromones are effective in extremely initial establishment of mealybug colonies. The
small quantities; they are nontoxic and can be traps are baited with female mealybug phero-
applied in various ways. Unlike pesticides, these mone impregnated in a rubber lure. The traps are
chemicals are species specic and do not affect placed within the vine canopy to attract winged
benecial insects. The behavioral impacts of the male mealybugs. When the mealybug population
semiochemicals are limited to the target pest is small, using a sex pheromone trap to attract
organisms. The potential of mealybug sex phero- winged males is far more efcient than trying to
mones as an alternative and ecologically friendly search vines over a large area for hidden females.
means for monitoring and control is important The male mealybugs can y about one-half mile,
and promising. Sex pheromones are used in lures and it can be wind-blown much further. Mealybug
for monitoring, for detection of outbreaks, and monitoring methods involve examination of spe-
for population management. Monitoring systems cic plant parts for live individuals, and detection
provide vital information for the timing of insec- of honeydew, sooty mold, or ant activity (Franco
ticide applications. Population levels can be et al. 2004a, b; Millar et al. 2005a). Sampling
reduced or controlled by mass trapping, mating procedures have been developed for several
disruption, or lure and kill. The success of these mealybug species and various crops, such as the
methods depends on the availability of the phero- citrus mealybug, Pl. citri (Martinez-Ferrer et al.
mone, and on an appropriate formulation and 2006), the grape mealybug, Ps. maritimus
deployment. In contrast to the extensive use of (Geiger and Daane 2001), or the sugarcane
sex pheromones in controlling beetle and moth mealybug, S. sacchari (Allsopp 1991; Debarro
pests, sex pheromones are yet to be used to a 1991). However, the cryptic occurrences of
great extent in controlling the mealybugs. mealybugs as well as their typical clumped spa-
tial distribution (Allsopp 1991; Martinez-Ferrer
et al. 2006; Nestel et al. 1995) make monitoring
14.10.1 Monitoring laborious and often impracticable. Population
estimates based on the level of male capture in
Sampling is a key element of mealybug manage- pheromone-baited traps are considered more
ment, because of the need for real-time informa- convenient (Millar et al. 2005a). Much work has
tion on the mealybug population and the potential been done to optimize these sampling methods,
188 N. Bakthavatsalam

especially in relation to trap design, trap color, Information on the level of male capture in spring
type of dispenser, pheromone dose, and bait lon- or early summer by application of pheromone
gevity and range (Francis et al. 2007; Franco traps is used to predict mealybug density or per-
et al. 2004a, 2008a, 2009; Millar et al. 2002; centage of fruit infestation and consequently to
Vitullo et al. 2007; Walton et al. 2004; Zada et al. assist in the decision making for the purpose of
2004, 2008). Nevertheless, the use of pheromone the citrus mealybug management (Franco et al.
traps as a monitoring tool for mealybug damage 2001). The analogous compound, 1R cis-3-
risk assessment depends on the existence of a isopropyl-2-2-diemthyl cyclobutyl methyl acetate
reasonable relationship between the number of was impregnated at 2,000 g in each dispenser
males captured in pheromone-baited traps and almost equaling 500 g of pheromone of Pl. citri
other mealybug infestation parameters, as to monitor the mealybugs (Franco et al. 2004b). In
recorded by other means, usually, visual sam- Mediterranean Basin, the best time for releasing
pling. A linear relationship was found to exist the natural enemies Cryptolaemus montrouzieri
between the vine mealybug, Pl. cus (Walton Muls. and Leptomastix dactylopii How. for the
et al. 2004), and the citrus mealybug, Pl. citri control of Pl. citri in citrus orchards was deduced
(Franco et al. 2001). However, this correlation from mealybug population monitoring by means
may be affected by different factors, including of traps containing the sex pheromone of P. citri
the weather, the activity of natural enemies, and (Panis 1981).
the phenological gap between male captures and
infestation level (Franco et al. 2001, 2008a). 14.10.1.3 Pseudococcus longispinus
and Pseudococcus viburni
14.10.1.1 Pseudococcus comstocki Positive and signicant relationship exists
The seasonal ight activity of Ps. comstocki in between pome fruit infestation and number of Ps.
California was monitored with sex pheromone vulbuni in pheromone traps baited with phero-
traps (Meyerdirk and Newell 1979). In the mone, and pheromone monitoring was done to
Moldavian area of the USSR, a synthetic material estimate the action threshold, which was esti-
of sex pheromone proved very successful in mated to be 2.5 male Ps. viburni (Mudavanhu
detecting not only the presence of Ps. comstocki et al. 2011). Lures containing 25 g per lure was
but also the information on its population density attractive to Ps. viburni and Ps. longispinus.
in mulberry ecosystem (Bichina et al. 1982). Racemic mixtures of S-lavandulyl senecioate and
Pheromone of Ps. comstocki containing (S)-lavandulyl isovalerate recorded good capture
2,6,-dimethyl-1,5,-heptadient at the rate of 200 (Zada et al. 2008). Operational parameters of
g per trap, placed at a height of 1.52 m, was able traps baited with the pheromones of three
to trap the adult males, and used for recording the mealybug species were optimized in nurseries
uctuation of daily and seasonal ight dynamics producing ornamental plants. All pheromone
(Smetnik and Rozinskaya 1988). doses (1320 g) attracted Ps. longispinus and
Ps. viburni males, with the lowest dose (1 g)
14.10.1.2 Planococcus citri attracting the fewest males for both species.
Monitoring population densities of Planococcus Lures containing 25-g doses of either phero-
citri in citrus ecosystem was based on male mone had effective eld lifetimes of at least 12
capture using traps baited with female sex phero- weeks. Pheromone traps were used to detect
mones. Pheromone of Pl. citri was used for the infestations of Ps. longispinus throughout the
early detection of the pest occurrence in citrus season and to track population cycles. When
elds (Ortu and Delrio 1982). In Israel, the sea- pheromone-baited traps for Ps. longispinus were
sonal population uctuations and trends of Pl. compared with manual sampling, trap counts of
citri were monitored (Hefetz and Tauber 1990; male mealybugs were signicantly correlated
Tauber et al. 1985) and traps were being used in with mealybugs counted on plants in the vicinity
conjunction with biological control methods. of the traps (Waterworth et al. 2011).
14 Semiochemicals in Mealybugs 189

14.10.1.4 Planococcus cus 14.11 Mixed Mealybugs


Vine mealybug Pl. cus pheromones are placed
in traps and used to deduct the infestation of Often in eld conditions, more than one mealy-
mealybugs. Typically, they are effective in bug species complex exist, necessitating the use
detecting new infestations. A sex pheromone of blend of more than one pheromone for trap-
produced by female mealybugs is used inside ping multiple species. The same generic lure can
each trap to attract adult males nearby. The males attract three species of mealybugs, which would
enter seeking the females and become trapped cut costs for growers by allowing them to deploy
inside. Although they may be designed in differ- a single pheromone trap rather than three. Lures
ent shapes, tent-shaped red traps are recom- loaded with a mixture of the pheromones of Ps.
mended. In eld trials conducted by Millar et al. longispinus, Ps. viburni, and Pl. citri were as
(2002), it was observed that the rubber septa attractive to Ps. viburni and Ps. citri as lures with
loaded with 100 g of racemic pheromone was their individual pheromones. Response of Ps.
able to effectively capture the males of Pl. cus longispinus to the blend was decreased by 38 %
for a period up to 12 weeks, and Delta traps were compared with its pheromone as a single compo-
more effective than double-sided adhesive sticky nent. This should not affect the overall efcacy
cards (Millar et al. 2002). of using these lures for monitoring the presence
of all three mealybug species simultaneously
14.10.1.5 Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Waterworth et al. 2011). Trapping indicated a
The pheromone was used to attract the males of sharp peak in male citrophilus mealybug ight
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Vitullo et al. 2007). activity in mid-February with a gradual decline
Laboratory-prepared (R)-lavandulyl (S)-2- thereafter. Long-tailed mealybug ight activity
methylbutanoate and (R)-maconelliyl (S)-2- increased during March and peaked in late April
methylbutanoate blended in a ratio of 1:5 on when trapping ceased. Higher numbers of
rubber septa impregnated with a dose of 110 g citrophilus mealybug males (36,764) were
were attractive to males of M. hirusutus for a trapped than long-tailed mealybug (693).The
period of 21 weeks (Zhang and Amalin 2005). It dominant species was the longtailed mealybug,
was found that the mixture of lavandulyl and identied on 92 % of infested fruit. Citrophilus
maconellyl in a 1:5 ratio signicantly attracted and obscure mealybugs (Ps. viburni) were identi-
more males of M. hirsutus and was used to track ed on 3 % and 5 % of infested fruit, respectively
the geographical dispersal of the species (Shaw and Wallis 2011).
(Gonzalez-Gaona et al. 2010).

14.10.1.6 Phenacoccus madeirensis 14.11.1 Mating Disruption


The pheromones trans-1R,3R-chrysanthemyl
R-2-methylbutanoate and R-lanadulyl R-2- Mating disruption seems to be more advanta-
methylbutanaoate have shown the effectiveness geous in mealybugs than in Lepidoptera as
in attracting males of P. madeirensis (Ho et al. mealybug females are sessile and cannot migrate
2011). from one area to another as moths do. On the
other hand, mating disruption of mealybug pests
14.10.1.7 Pseudococcus viburni presents problems, especially because the com-
Pheromone-baited traps have been used in New plex structure of the pheromones prevents large-
Zealand to detect Ps. viburni in apple orchards scale synthesis. The vine mealybug pheromone is
(Bell et al. 2005). the only mealybug pheromone that can readily be
190 N. Bakthavatsalam

synthesized in one step from two commercial ping, but not signicant enough to cause any
starting materials, so that it can be prepared in reduction in the infestation on fruits in
large quantities, sufcient for eld work, includ- Mediterranean countries (Franco et al. 2003).
ing mating disruption (Ujita and Saeki 2008; Similarly in Israel and Portugal, signicant
Walton et al. 2006). When the pheromone was reduction of male numbers can be achieved by
applied to the leaves as a sprayable microcapsule mass trapping with sticky plate traps (30 cm 30
formulation, crop damage was reduced from 9 to cm) baited with 200 g of pheromone used at a
11 % in control plots to 34 % in treated plots; rate of one per citrus tree, although fruit infesta-
however, the effective life of the formulation tion did not reduce signicantly. Therefore, as
presents a technical problem that needs to be the pheromone trapping system used cannot
solved. The efciency of the pheromone formu- reduce the number of attracted males effectively,
lation in the eld declined after 3 weeks, indicat- it is most likely that many of them originated
ing that more than four applications per season from outside the subplot. In fact, males are
were needed. The proximity of the mealybug attracted to the pheromone source from ranges up
sexes on emergence may also impair the success to at least 100 m (Branco et al. 2006; Franco et al.
of mating disruption (Walton et al. 2006). Mating 2004a). On the other hand, the higher level of
disruption in Planococcus kraunhiae through the mating observed in mass-trapping plots early in
use of pheromone, 2-isopropyliden-5-methyl-4- the spring, when the mealybug density is usually
hexenyl butyrate controlled the mealybug popu- very low, suggested that mass trapping led to a
lations in the eld in Japan (Teshiba et al. 2009). strong attraction of males from outside the sub-
There was a lesser density of Planococcus cus plots. In light of this nding, it was postulated
on leaves of vines treated with plastic dispensers that early in the season, when the male popula-
with 100 mg each of synthetic sex pheromone tion is usually low, the attraction of males to the
than the control; however, the difference was not edge of the orchard by using attractannihilate
signicant (Cocco et al. 2011). Due to its effec- tactics combined creates a male vacuum inside
tiveness in traps, developing the pheromone to the plot and, consequently, reduces mating and
control vine mealybug populations (Planococcus infestation (Franco et al. 2004a).
cus) using mating disruption was pursued
(http:// advancinggreenchemistry. org/ catch-all/ 14.11.2.2 Maconellicoccus hirsutus
mating-disruption-as-a-pest-management-tool- The quantum of pheromones produced through
in-californias-wine-industry/). synthesis was not sufcient to use for mass
trapping and mating disruption. However
recently, Chemist Aijun Zhang in Beltsville, MD,
14.11.2 Mass Trapping developed the pheromone, which mimics the
female mealybugs scent, and South Carolina
An articial lure might also enable the development Scientic Inc., of Columbia, SC, will market the
of mass trapping and mating disruption technology chemical. There is also a second potential control
for managing this pest, which would complement strategy (http://www.thegrower.com/news/rmto
the ongoing biological control eradication efforts. market pink mealybug pheromone_117886474.
In addition to their use for detection and monitoring html#sthash.2KIGfvcv.dpuf).
of insect populations, pheromones also have a
potential use in insect control, for example, by 14.11.2.3 Pseudococcus calceolariae
mating disruption or attract-and-kill technologies. In 1975, a mass-trapping experiment was carried
out against Pseudococcus calceolariae (Mask.),
14.11.2.1 Planococcus citri which was causing heavy damage on citrus near
Pheromones are yet to be exploited to a great Salerno, Italy; 79 traps baited with 1,538 virgin
extent for mass trapping of mealybugs. There females were placed in 25 orange trees over an
was a signicant reduction in the population of P. area of 1 ha in a single orchard, and they caught
citri when pheromone was used for mass trap- about 300,000 males of the species. Populations
14 Semiochemicals in Mealybugs 191

were sampled in 19751978 in order to assess the The sex pheromone of mealybugs may be
long-term effect of the traps on population used by their natural enemies as a kairomonal cue
dynamics. Up to 1976, a sevenfold reduction in in host or prey selection. Anagyrus pseudococci
captures of males and a tenfold decrease in popu- sp.n. is an effective parasitoid of vine mealybug
lations on fruits in this orchard were registered. Pl. cus and citrus mealybug Pl. citri. Anagyrus
Flight peaks of Ps. calceolariae occurred in mid- pseudococci in California vineyards was attracted
May, mid-July, and late September. It was not to the pheromone ((+)-lavandulyl senecioate
possible to determine from the experiments (LS)) of Pl. cus (Millar et al. 2002; Franco et al.
whether the decline in Ps. calceolariae was due 2008c) but Anagyrus pseudococci sp.n. was not
to either the earlier catches of males in the traps attracted to the pheromone ((+)-(1R,3R)-cis-2,2-
or sudden increases in populations of coccinellid dimethyl- 3-isopropenyl-cyclobutanemethanol
predator (Rotundo et al. 1979a, b). acetate (PcA, namely, planococcyl acetate) of P.
citri (Franco et al. 2008c, 2011; da Silva et al.
14.11.2.4 Planococcus cus 2009a, b); and this kairomonal response was an
The use of synthetic sex pheromones, such as innate behavior trait. An interesting aspect of this
those found in Suterras CheckMate products program is that a parasitoid of the vine mealybug
for mating disruption of vine mealybug, aims to (Anagyrus pseudococci) may be attracted to the
prevent adult males from mating. The use of mealybug pheromone as a host-nding cue,
degree-day models, pheromone traps, and eld resulting in greater levels of biological control.
observations are helpful for detecting the earliest There is a minimal risk of parasitoids being
colonies of mealybugs. By preventing mating caught if lures are deployed in triangular tent-
and subsequent egg laying, vine mealybug popu- shaped Delta traps. It was also found that the
lations can be dramatically reduced to below presence of Pl. cus sex pheromone signicantly
economically damaging levels. increases the parasitization rate of Pl. citri colo-
nies by Anagyrus pseudococci. (Franco et al.
2008b). In eld trials in Portugal, Italy, and
14.11.3 Kairomonal Response Israel, the rate of parasitism by A. pseudococci
was improved through the use of pheromone
The pheromone-lled air also acts as kairomones (Franco et al. 2001). In Sicilian orchards (Italy)
for several predators and parasitoids. The sex infested with Pl. cus, the number of captured A.
pheromone emitted by mealybug virgin females pseudococci females per trap was signicantly
provides reliable information on the location of a higher in LS (sex pheromone (S)-(+)-lavandulyl
potential host for mealybug parasitoids, because senecioate (LS)-baited traps resulting in the
of the sedentary nature of mealybugs. enhancement of the parasitoid performance
Furthermore, because of the typical clumped spa- (Mansour et al. 2010).
tial pattern of mealybugs, the sex pheromone will Pheromone-based mating disruption of vine
also be a convenient chemical cue by which the mealybug indicated that the treatment had no
parasitoid can efciently locate aggregates (colo- negative effect on the level of parasitization
nies) of hosts, which are expected to emit a stron- (Walton et al. 2006) with Pl. cus by A. pseudo-
ger pheromonal signal than that of single virgin cocci. The kairomonal response of Anagyrus
females (functional response). Thus, sex phero- pseudococci sp.n. could be explored in connec-
mones of mealybugs could serve as a novel and tion with biological control tactics, by enhancing
efcient tool to support the classical biological parasitization of Pl. citri as a component of inte-
control of invasive mealybug species, by identi- grated pest management strategies, by means of a
fying, in the region of origin of the target species, similar approach to that used against aphid pests
parasitoids that could be the potential candidates (Powell and Pickett 2003). Rotundo and
for use in the biological control program (Franco Tremblay (1975) reported that traps baited with
et al. 2008c). virgin females of Ps. calceolariae captured sig-
192 N. Bakthavatsalam

nicant numbers of the encyrtid Tetracnemoidea (Pseudococcus calceolariae) sex pheromone


peregrinus (Compere) (=Tetracnemoidea traps that were being monitored at heavily
peregrina(Compere); Arhopoideus peregrinus). infested mealybug orchards. It is quite conceiv-
A kairomonal response of the encyrtid able that the high numbers of parasitoids in pher-
Pseudaphycus maculipennis Mercet to the sex omone traps and the low numbers of citrophilus
pheromone of the obscure mealybug, Ps. Viburni, mealybugs in fruit at harvest indicated that it was
was also observed in eld experiments with pher- an effective biological control agent in these
omone traps (Bell et al. 2008). Two species of properties (Shaw et al. 2012).
mealybug parasitoids were caught in traps baited
with the sex pheromone of Ps. cryptus in a citrus
orchard in Japan (Arai 2002). Cassava plants 14.12 Dogs for Monitoring
infested with the mealybugs are attractive to the Mealybug Incidence
parasitoids such as Aenasius vexans Kerrich,
Apoanagurus diversicornis, and Acerophagus Dogs have been trained to detect the presence of
coccois Smith. A compound O-caffeoylserine is females of grapevine mealybugs in California.
attractive to the parasitoids of mealybugs The 3-month-old puppies of Golden retriever
(Calatayud et al. 2001). have been frequently exposed to the pheromone
In New Zealand, Acerophagus maculipennis, component of grapevine mealybugs and when
a recently introduced biocontrol agent, has been they are around 2 years old, they are fully trained
recorded from sex pheromone traps of its target to identify the presence of mealybugs. The dogs
host, obscure mealybug (Pseudococcus viburni). are capable of identifying even the twigs with the
Alamella mira Noyes, an accidentally introduced females. This method of using dogs olfactory
parasitoid in New Zealand, was captured on senses has resulted in saving of crops worth sev-
sticky bases in citrophilus mealybug eral millions besides saving the environment.

Dog squad strategies being considered to stop the vine mealybug


14 Semiochemicals in Mealybugs 193

14.13 Future Prospects semiochemicals for the complex pheromone


species in any crop will be advantageous to
The pheromones for only a few of species the farmers and such generic pheromone or
such as Planococcus citri and M. hirsutus semiochemical will also be of commercial
were isolated, identied, and used in other success for the entrepreneurs.
countries. Use of these pheromones as a moni- For the effective management of mealybug,
toring tool will be a great boon for the farmers mating disruption and inoculative releases of
to identify the initial stages of infestation. parasitoids (such as Anagyrus pseudococci)
However, the pheromone for several impor- were considered as effective strategies for the
tant invasive species such as Paracoccus mar- management of mealybugs in vineyards
ginatus Williams and Granara de Willink and (Daane et al. 2008). This will enable environ-
Phenococcus solenopsis Tinsley needs to be mental friendly, healthy, and safe methods of
identied for eld monitoring. Besides moni- mealybug management of the future.
toring the incidence, the pheromone may also In India, the pheromones were seldom used
be used to study the spread of the mealybug, though pheromones for several Indian species
for example, the dispersal pattern of P. mar- have been identied elsewhere. A concerted
ginatus and Pseudococcus jackberdsleyi effort is needed to use pheromones for
Gimpel and Miller can be easily documented monitoring and for mating disruption of the
in time and space. mealybug species by the plant protection
There are several species of potential inva- experts. The entrepreneurs should take efforts
sives such as Phenacoccus manihoti, and the either to import the pheromone or to develop
identication of pheromones for these species facilities for indigenously synthesizing the
will enable us to monitor the entry of this spe- pheromones and market at a cheaper rate in
cies into India. It will be worthwhile to isolate, order to guarantee the continuous availability
identify, and synthesize these pheromones for of pheromones to the farmers.
the quarantine monitoring throughout the Wherever the pheromones were not identied
world. Installations at ports, airports, and for the species, both indigenous and exotic,
other entry points will enable in the early efforts must be made to identify and synthesize
detection of these mealybugs. pheromones that can be useful for monitoring
The technique for the isolation, identication, the pests, which can be effective tools for quar-
and characterization of mealybug pheromones antine monitoring and population studies.
has been standardized over the years, enabling Awareness should be brought to the farmers
us to identify the pheromones for any species. and the pest management experts on the scope
Moreover, the synthesis of pheromones for a of using the pheromones for effective man-
few species has been accomplished. However, agement of mealybugs.
the ability to synthesize pheromone on a large Work has to be initiated on the role of plant
scale remains an unfullled task resulting in volatiles in the attraction of mealybugs and
the use of pheromone only for monitoring, their natural enemies, which can be used both
and not for the mating disruption and mass for monitoring of pest and natural enemies
trapping. Efforts are needed to develop shorter and for reinforcing the natural enemy
synthesis schemes for the effective synthesis populations.
of pheromones in both quality and quantity. Collaborative efforts between countries need
Often the infestation of complex species of to be made through international funding to
mealybugs was encountered in many crops, isolate, identify, and synthesize pheromones
thus necessitating the identication and use of of potential invasives for quarantine screen-
generic pheromones. Generic pheromone or ing, a prophylactic measure of biosecurity.
194 N. Bakthavatsalam

References Calatayud PA, Auger J, Thibout E, Rousset S, Caicedo


AM, Calatayud S, Buschmann H, Guillaud J, Mandon
N, Bellotti AC (2001) Identication and synthesis of a
A SA (1968) Morphology and taxonomy of the adult
kairomone mediating host location by two parasitoid
males of the families Pseudococcidae and Eriococcidae
species of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus herreni.
(Homoptera: Coccoidea). Bull Brit Mus (Nat Hist)
J Chem Ecol 27:22032217
Entomol 13(Suppl):1210
Carlsen PHJ, Odden W (1984) Synthesis of the female sex
Ahmad R, Ghani MA (1970) A note on the rearing of
pheromone of the citrus mealybug, Planoccus citri
scale insects and mealybugs on potato tubers and
(Risso). Acta Chem Scand B 38:501504
cucurbit fruits. Technical Bulletin, Commonwealth
Chacko MJ, Bhat PK, Rao LVA, Deepak Singh MB,
Institute of Biological Control, 13, pp 105107
Ramanarayan BP, Sreedharan K (1978) The use of the
Allsopp PG (1991) Binomial sequential sampling of adult
lady bird beetle Cryptolaemus montrouzieri for the
Saccharicoccus sacchari on sugarcane. Entomol Exp
control of coffee mealybugs. J Coff Res 9:1419
Appl 60:213218
Chibiryaev A, Rukavishnikov AV, Tkachev AV, Volodarskii
Arai T (2002) Attractiveness of sex pheromone of
LB (1991) New synthesis of the sex pheromone of the
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel (Homoptera:
mealybug Planococcus citri from a -pinene. Zh Org
Pseudococcidae) to adult males in a citrus orchard.
Khim 27:12091213
Appl Entomol Zool 37:6972
Cocco A, Coinu M, Lentini A, Serra G, Delrio G (2011)
Arai T, Sugie H, Hiradate S, Kuwahara S, Itagaki N,
Mating disruption eld trials to control the vine
Nakahata T (2003) Identication of a sex pheromone
mealybug Planococcus cus. IOBC/WPRS Bull
component of Pseudococcus cryptus. J Chem Ecol
67:215221
29:22132223
da Silva EB, Fortuna T, Franco JC, Campos L, Branco M,
Baeckstroem P, Li L (1990) A one pot procedure for the
Zada A, Mendel Z (2009a) Does the parasitoid
deoxygenation of , -unsaturated ketones and a syn-
Anagyrus pseudococci respond to the sex pheromone
thesis of the mealybug pheromone. Synth Commun
of major host-mealybug species? IOBC/WPRS Bull
20:14811485
41:147
Baeckstrom P, Bjorkling F, Hogberg HE, Norin T (1984)
da Silva EB, Fortuna T, Franco JC, Campos L, Branco M,
Cross-coupling of vinyl cuprates and allylic halides
Zada A, Mendel Z (2009b) Kairomonal response of a
and synthesis of the Comstock mealybug pheromone
parasitic wasp to the sex pheromone of the vineyard
via photooxidation of 2,6-dimethyl-2,5-heptadiene.
mealybug. IOBC/WPRS Bull 41:7982
Acta Chem Scand B 38:779782
da Silva EB, Mouco J, Antunes R, Mendel Z, Franco JC
Bakonyi JM (2012) Improved synthesis of the longtailed
(2009c) Mate location and sexual maturity of adult
mealybug pheromone. Masters theses, Paper 231.
male mealybugs: narrow window of opportunity in a
http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/gstheses/231
short lifetime. IOBC/WPRS Bull 41:39
Bell VA, Walker JTS, Shaw PW, Wallis RD, Suckling
Daane KM, Bentley WJ, Millar JC, Walton VM, Cooper
DM, Millar JG (2005) Mealybug monitoring and the
ML, Biscay P, Yokota GY (2008) Integrated manage-
use of sex pheromone in Hawkes Bay & Nelson apple
ment of mealybugs in California vineyards. Acta
orchards. HoRt Res internal report no 17359, 12 pp
Hortic 785:235252
Bell VA, Suckling DM, Walker JTS, Millar JG, Manning
Daane KM, Middleton MC, Sforza R, Cooper ML, Walton
LA, El-Sayed AM (2008) Obscure mealybug phero-
VA, Walsh DB, Zaviezo T, Almeida PP (2011)
mone is the kairomone of an introduced parasitoid in
Development of a multiplex PCR for identication of
New Zealand. In: Proceedings of XXIII international
vineyard mealybugs. Mol Ecol Evol
congress on entomology, 612 July 2008, Durban
40(6):15951603
(Abstract). Available at http://www.ice2008.org.za/
de Alfonso I, Hernandez E, Velazquez Y, Navarro I, Primo
pdf/proceedings.pdf
J (2012) Identication of the sex pheromone of the
Bichina TI, Kovalev BG, Smetnik AI, Vaganova LD
mealybug Dysmicoccus grassii Leonardi. J Agric
(1982) A test of the pheromone of the Comstock
Food Chem 60(48):1195911964
mealybug [Russian]. Zashchita Rastenii 10:46
Debarro PJ (1991) Sampling strategies for above and
Bierl-Leonhardt BA, Moreno DS, Schwarz M, Fargerlund J,
below ground populations of Saccharicoccus sacchari
Plimmer JR (1981) Isolation, identication and synthe-
(Cockerell) (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae) on sugar-
sis of the sex pheromone of the citrus mealybug,
cane. J Aust Entomol Soc 30:1920
Planococcus citri (Risso). Tetrahedron Lett 22:389392
Doane CC (1966) Evidence for a sex attractant in females
Bierl-Leonhardt BA, Moreno DS, Schwarz M, Forster
of the red pine scale. J Econ Entomol 59:15391540
HS, Plimmer JR, DeVilbiss ED (1982) Isolation, iden-
Duelli P (1985) A new functional interpretation of the
tication, synthesis, and bioassay of the pheromone of
visual system of male scale insects (Coccida,
the comstock mealybug and some analogs. J Chem
Homoptera). Experientia 41:1036
Ecol 8:689699
Dunkelblum E (1999) Scale insects. In: Hardie J, Minks
Branco M, Jactel H, Franco JC, Mendel Z (2006)
AK (eds) Pheromones of non-lepidopteran insects.
Modelling response of insect trap captures to phero-
CAB International, Oxon, UK, pp 251276
mone dose. Ecol Model 197:247257
14 Semiochemicals in Mealybugs 195

Dunkelblum E, Ben-Don Y, Goldschmidt Z, Wolk JL, May vine mealybug sex pheromone improve the
Somekh L (1986) Synthesis and eld bioassay of the biological control of the citrus mealybug? IOBC/
sex pheromone and some analogues of the citrus mea- WPRS Bull 38:9498
lubug Planococcus citri (Risso). Bollatino de- Franco JC, Silva EB, Cortegano E, Campos L, Branco M,
laboratorio di Entomologia Agraia Filippo Silvestri Zada A, Mendel Z (2008c) Kairomonal response of
43(Suppl):149154 the parasitoid Anagyrus spec. nov near pseudococci to
Dunkelblum E, Ben-Don Y, Goldschmidt Z, Wolk JL, the sex pheromone of the vine mealybug. Entomol
Somekh L (1987) Synthesis and eld bioassay of some Exp Appl 126:122130
analogs of sex pheromone of citrus mealybug, Franco JC, Zada A, Mendel Z (2009) Novel approaches for
Planococcus citri (Risso). J Chem Ecol 13:863871 the management of mealybug pests. In: Ishaaya I,
Dunkelblum E, Zada A, Gross S, Fraistat P, Mendel Z Horowitz AR (eds) Biorational control of arthropod pests.
(2002) Sex pheromone and analogues of the citrus Springer Science + Business Media B.V., Dordrecht,
mealybug, Planococcus citri: synthesis and biological pp 233278. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2316-2_10
activity. IOBC WPRS Bull 25:19 Franco JC, da Silva EB, Fortuna T, Cortegano E, Branco
El-Sayed AM, Unelius RC, Twidle A, Mitchell V, Manning M, Suma P, La Torre I, Russo A, Elyahu M, Protasov
LA, Cole L, Suckling DM, Flores MF, Zaviezo T, A, Levi-Zada A, Mendel Z (2011) Vine mealybug sex
Bergmann J (2010) Chrysanthemyl pheromone increases citrus mealybug parasitism by
2-acetoxy-3-methylbutanoate: the sex pheromone of Anagyrus sp. near pseudococci (Girault). Biol Control
the citrophilous mealybug, Pseudococcus calceolar- 58(3):230238
iae. Tetrahedron Lett 51:10751078 Geiger CA, Daane KM (2001) Seasonal movement and distri-
Fall Y, Vanbac N, Langlois Y (1986) Synthesis of the pher- bution of the grape mealybug (Homoptera:
omone of the Comstock mealybug via a sila-cope Pseudococcidae): developing a sampling program for San
elimination. Tetrahedron Lett 27:36113614 Joaquin Valley vineyards. J Econ Entomol 94:291301
Fargerlund J, Moreno DS (1974) A method of handling Gonzalez-Gaona E, Sanchez-Martinez G, Zhang A,
card traps in mealybug, scale surveys. Citrograph Lozano-Gutierrez J, Carmona-Sosa F (2010)
60(1):2628 Validation of two pheromonal compounds for moni-
Figadere BA, McElfresh JS, Borchardt D, Daane KM, toring pink hibiscus mealybug in Mexico. Agrociencia
Bentley W, Miller JG (2007) Trans a-necrodyl isobutyrate, (Montecillo) 44(1):6573
the sex pheromones of the grape mealybug Pseudococcus Gullan PJ, Kosztarab M (1997) Adaptations in scale
maritimus. Tetrahedron Lett 48:84348437 insects. Annu Rev Entomol 42:2350
Francis A, Bloem KA, Roda AL, Lapointe SL, Zhang A, Hajare AK, Datrange LS, Vyas S, Bhuniya D, Reddy DS
Onokpise O (2007) Development of trapping methods (2010) Enantiospecic synthesis of sex pheromone of
with a synthetic sex pheromone of the pink hibiscus the obscure mealybug from pantolactone via tandem
mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera: conjugate addition/cyclization. Tetrahedron Lett
Pseudococcidae). Flor Entomol 90:440446 51(40):52915293
Franco JC, Russo A, Suma P, Silva EB, Dunkelblum E, Hashimoto K, Morita A, Kuwahara S (2008)
Mendel Z (2001) Monitoring stratagies for the citrus Enantioselective synthesis of a mealybug pheromone
mealybug in citrus orchards. Bolletino di Zoologia with an irregular monoterpenoid skeleton. J Org Chem
Agraria e di Bachicotura 33(3):297303 73:69136915
Franco JC, Suma P, Silva ED, Mendel Z (2003) Hefetz A, Tauber O (1990) Male response to the synthetic
Management strategies of mealybug pests of citrus in sex pheromone of Planococcus citri (Risso) (Hom.:
Mediterranean countries. Bull OILB/SROP 26(6):137 Diaspidae) and its application for population monitor-
Franco JC, Gross S, Silva EB, Suma P, Russo A, Mendel ing. J Appl Entomol 109:502506
Z (2004a) Is mass-trapping a feasible management Hinkens DM, McElfresh JS, Millar JG (2001)
tactic of the citrus mealybug in citrus orchards? An Identication and synthesis of the sex pheromone of
Inst Sup Agron 49:353367 the vine mealybug, Planococcus cus. Tetrahedron
Franco JC, Suma P, Silva ED, Blumberg D, Mendel Z Lett 42:16191622
(2004b) Management strategies of mealybug pests of Ho HY, Hung CC, Chuang TH, Wang WL (2007)
citrus in Mediterranean countries. Phytoparasitica Identication and synthesis of the sex pheromone of
32(5):507522 the passionvine mealybug, Planococcus minor
Franco JC, Antunes R, Lemos R, Pinto A, Campos L, Silva (Maskell). J Chem Ecol 33:19861996
EB, Branco M, Mendel Z (2008a) Do mealybug males Ho HY, Su YT, Ko CH, Tsai MY (2009) Identication and
respond to visual cues when approaching pheromone synthesis of the sex pheromone of the Madeira mealy-
sources? In: Branco M, Franco JC, Hodgson CJ (eds) bug, Phenacoccus madeirensis Green. J Chem Ecol
Proceedings of the XI International Symposium Scale 35:724732
Insect Studies, Oeiras, Portugal, 2427 September Ho HY, Ko CH, Cheng CC, Su YT, Someshwar P (2011)
2007. ISA Press, Oeiras, Portugal, pp 230231 Chirality and bioactivity of the sex pheromone of
Franco JC, Fortuna T, Silva EB, Da Suma P, Russo A, Madeira mealybug (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae).
Campos L, Branco M, Zada A, Mendel Z (2008b) J Econ Entomol 104(3):823826
196 N. Bakthavatsalam

Hwang JS, Chu YI (1987a) The development of sex pher- male mealybug. In: Branco M, Franco JC, Hodgson CJ
omone traps for the citrus mealybug, Planococcus (eds) Proceedings of the XI International Symposium
citri (Risso). Plant Prot Bull (Taiwan) 29(3):297305 Scale Insect Studies, Oeiras, Portugal, 2427
Hwang JS, Chu YI (1987b) A bioassay method of the sex September 2007. ISA Press, Oeiras, Portugal, p 121
pheromone of the citrus mealybug, Planococcus Mendel Z, Jasrotia P, Protasov A, Kol-Maimon H, Zada AL,
citri (Risso). [Chinese]. Plant Prot Bull (Taiwan) Franco JC (2012) Responses of second-instar male
29(3):307319 nymphs of four mealybug species (Hemiptera:
Ishchenko RI, Veselovskii VV, Moiseenkov AM, Cheskis Pseudococcidae) to conspecic and heterospecic
BA, Kovalev BG (1989) Synthesis of the racemic sex female sex pheromones. J Insect Behav 25(5):504513
pheromone of Pseudococcus comstocki. Chem Nat Meyerdirk DE, Newell IM (1979) Seasonal development
Comp 25:118119 and ight activity of Pseudococcus comstocki in
Joshi MD, Butani PG, Patel VN, Jeyakumar P (2010) California. Ann Entomol Soc Am 72(4):492494
Cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley Millar JG (2008) Stereospecic synthesis of the sex pher-
A review. Agric Rev 31:113119 omone of the passionvine mealybug, Planococcus
Kang SK, Park CS (1990) A synthesis of ()-3-acetoxy- minor. Tetrahedron Lett 49(2):315317
2,6-dimethyl-1,5-heptadiene, the sex pheromone of the Millar JG, Midland SL (2007) Synthesis of the sex phero-
Comstock mealybug. Org Prep Proced Int 22:627629 mone of the obscure mealybug, the rst example of a
Kol-Maimon H, Levi-Zada A, Franco JC, Dunkelblum E, new class of monoterpenoids. Tetrahedron Lett
Protasov A, Eliyaho M, Mendelb Z (2010) Male 48(36):63776379
behaviors reveal multiple pherotypes within vine Millar JG, Daane KM, McElfresh JS, Moreira JA,
mealybug Planococcus cus (Signoret) (Hemiptera; Malakar-Kuenen R, Guillen M, Bentley WJ (2002)
Pseudococcidae) populations. Naturwissenschaften Development and optimization of methods for using
97(12):10471057 sex pheromone for monitoring the mealybug
Kukovinets OS, Zvereva TI, Kesradze VG, Galin FZ, Planococcus cus (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in
Frolova LL, Kuchin AV, Sprikhin LV, Abdullin MI California vineyards. J Econ Entomol 95:706714
(2006) Novel synthesis of Planococcus citri phero- Millar JG, Daane KM, McElfresh JS, Moreira JA, Bentley
mone. Chem Nat Comp 42(2):216218 WJ (2005a) Chemistry and applications of mealybug
Kurhade SE, Siddiah V, Bhumiya D, Reddy DS (2013) sex pheromones. In: Petroski RJ, Tellez MR, Behle
Synthesis of a sex pheromone of the long tailed mealy- RW (eds) Semiochemicals in pest and weed control.
bug, Pseudococcus longispinus. Synthesis 45:16891692 American Chemical Society, Washington, DC
Larcheveque M, Petit Y (1989) Preparation of enantio- Millar JG, Midland SL, Mcelfresh S, Daane KM (2005b)
merically pure -hydroxy esters and -hydroxy alde- (1R,2R,3S)-(2,3,4,4-tetramethylcyclopentyl) methyl
hydes. Application to the enantiospecic synthesis of acetate, a sex pheromone from the obscure mealybug:
the sex pheromone of the mealybug Pseudococcus rst example of a new structural class of monoter-
comstocki. Bull Soc Chim Fr 1:130139 penes. J Chem Ecol 31:29993005
Liu F, Li W, Wang Y, Lin J (1995) Convenient syntheses of Millar JG, Moreira JA, McElfresh JS, Daane KM, Freund
some analogs of the sex pheromone of citrus mealy- AS (2009) Sex pheromone of the longtailed mealy-
bug, Planococcus citri (Risso). Synth Commun bug: a new class of monoterpene structure. Org Lett
25:38373843 11:26832685
Mansour R, Suma P, Mazzeo G, Buonocore E, Lebdi KG, Moreno DS, Reed DK, Shaw JG, Newell I (1972) Sex lure sur-
Russo A (2010) Using a kairomone based attracting vey trap for Comstock mealybug. Citrograph 58(2):43, 68
system to enhance biological control of mealybugs Moreno DS, Fargerlund J, Ewart WH (1984) Citrus
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) by Anagyrus sp. near mealybug (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae) behavior of
pseudococci (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) in Sicilian males in response to sex-pheromone in laboratory and
vineyards. J Entomol Acarol Res 42(3):161170 eld. Ann Entomol Soc Am 77:3238
Martinez-Ferrer MT, Ripolles JL, Garcia-Mari F (2006) Mori K, Ueda H (1981) Pheromone synthesis. Part
Enumerative and binomial sampling plans for citrus XLV. Synthesis of the optically active forms of
mealybug (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in citrus 2,6-dimethyl-1,5-heptadien-3-ol acetate, the pheromone
groves. J Econ Entomol 99:9931001 of the Comstock mealybug. Tetrahedron 37:25812583
McCullough DW, Bhupathy M, Piccolino E, Cohen T Mudavanhu P, Addison P, Ken LP (2011) Monitoring and
(1991) Highly efcient terpenoid pheromone synthe- action threshold determination for the obscure mealy-
sis via regio and stereo controlled processing of bug Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) (Hemiptera:
allylthiums generated by reductive lithiat. Tetrahedron Pseudococcidae) using pheromone-baited traps. Crop
47:97279736 Prot 30(7):919924
Mendel Z, Dunkelblum E, Branco M, Franco JC, Kurosawa Nakagawa N, Mori K (1984) Pheromone synthesis. Part
S, Mori K (2003) Synthesis and structure-activity rela- 69. New syntheses of (R)-(+)-3-acetoxy-2, 6-dimethyl-
tionship of diene modied analogs of Matsucoccus sex 1,5-heptadiene, the pheromone of the Comstock
pheromones. Naturwissenschaften 90:313317 mealybug. Agr Biol Chem Tokyo 48:27992803
Mendel Z, Protasov A, Zada A, Assael F, Jasrotia P, Franco Nakahata T, Itagaki N, Arai T, Sugie H, Kuwahara S
JC (2008) Longevity and sexual maturity of an adult (2003) Synthesis of the sex pheromone of the citrus
14 Semiochemicals in Mealybugs 197

mealybug, Pseudococcus cryptus. Biosci Biotechnol Identication of the California red scale sex phero-
Biochem 67:26272631 mone. J Chem Ecol 4:211224
Negishi T, Ishiwatari T, Asano S (1980a) Sex pheromone Rotundo G (1978) Mass isolation of virgin females of
of the Comstock mealybug, Pseudococcus comstocki Pseudococcus calceolariae (Mask.) (Homoptera,
Kuwana; bioassay method, male response-habits to Coccoidea) by the use of a juvenile hormone (Italian).
the sex pheromone [Japanese]. Jpn J Appl Entomol Bollettino del Laboratorio di Entomologia Agraria
Zool 24(1):15 Filippo Silvestri Portici 35:162168
Negishi T, Uchida M, Tamaki Y, Mori K, Isiwatari T, Asano Rotundo G, Tremblay E (1975) Sull attractivit delle
S, Nakagawa K (1980b) Sex pheromone of the comstock femmine vergini di due specie dePseudococcidi
mealybug, Pseudococcus comstocki Kuwana: isolation (Homoptera: Coccoidea) per un Imenottero parassita
and identication. Appl Entomol Zool 15:328333 (Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea). Boll Lab Entomol
Nestel D, Cohen H, Saphir N, Klein M, Mendel Z (1995) Agrar F Silvestri Portici 32:172179
Spatial distribution of scale insects comparative study Rotundo G, Tremblay E (1976) Simple extraction and bio-
using Taylors power-law. Environ Entomol 24:506512 assay of the female sex pheromone of the Citrus mealy-
Odinokov VN, Kukovinets OS, Isakova LA, Zainullin bug, Planococcus citri. Ann Appl Biol 82(1):165167
RA, Moiseenkov AM, Tolstikov GA (1984a) New Rotundo G, Tremblay E (1980) Evaluation of the daily rate
synthesis of the sex pheromone of Planococcus citri of sex pheromone release by the females of two mealy-
(Risso). Dokl Akad NaukSSSR+ 279:398401 bug species (Homoptera Coccoidea Pseudococcidae).
Odinokov VN, Kukovinets OS, Isakova LA, Zainullin Boll Lab Entomol Agrar F S Portici 37:167170
RA, Moiseenkov AM, Tolstikov GA (1984b) Rotundo G, Tremblay E (1982) Preliminary report on the
Ozonolysis of alkenes and study of reactions of poly- attractivity of the synthetic pheromone of Planococcus
functional compounds.43. Synthesis of (1R,3R)-(+)- citri (Rs.) (Homoptera:Coccoidea) in comparison to vir-
cis-1-acetoxymethyl-3-isopropenyl-2,2- gin females. Boll Lab Entomol Agrar F S 39:97101
dimethylcyclobutane sex pheromone of grape mealy Rotundo G, Gaston LK, Horey HH (1979a) Collection
bugs (Planococcus citri) and its (1S,3S)-()-cis- and purication of the female sex pheromone of
enantiomer. Zh Org Khim 27:555558 Pseudococcus calceolariae (Homoptera: Coccoidea).
Odinokov VN, Kukovinets OS, Isakova LA, Zainullin RA, Bollettino del Laboratorio di Entomologia Agraria
Moisunkov AM, Tolstikov GA (1991) Ozonolysis of Filippo Silvestri. Portici 36:160171
alkenes and study of reactions of polyfunctional com- Rotundo G, Tremblay E, Giacometti R (1979b) Final
pounds. 43. Synthesis of (1R 3R)-(+)-cis-acetoxy-methyl- results of mass captures of the citrophilous mealybug
3-isopropenyl-2,2-dimethyl cyclobutane- the sex males Pseudococcus calceolariae (Mask.) (Homoptera
pheromone of grape mealy bug (Planococcus citri) and its Coccoidea) in a citrus grove. Boll Lab Entomol Agrar
(1S, 3S)- ()-cis enantiomer. Zh Org Khim 27:555558 F S Portici 36:266274
Ortu S, Delrio G (1982) Osservazion sullimpiego in Rotundo G, Tremblay E, Papa P (1980) Short-range orien-
campo del feromone sessuali di sintesi di Planococcus tation of Pseudococcus calceolariae (Mask.) males
citri (Risso) (Homoptera: Coccoidae). Estratto da (Homoptera Coccoidea) in a wind tunnel. Boll Lab
Redia 65:341353 Entomol Agrar F S Portici 37:3137
Ortu S, Cocco A, Lentini A (2006) Utilisation of sexual Serebryakov EP, Suslova LM, Moiseenkov AM, Shavyrin
pheromones of Planococcus cus and Planococcus SV, Zaikina NV, Sorochinskaya AM, Kovalev BG
citri in vineyards. Bull OILB/SROP 29:207208 (1986) Terpenes in organic syntheses. 1. Synthesis of
Panis A (1981) Mealybugs (Homoptera, Coccoidea: (1R,3S)-1-(acetoxymethyl)-3-isopropenyl-2,2-
Pseudococcidae) within the framework of integrated dimethylcyclobutane (sex pheromone of the citrus
control in Mediterranean citrus-growing [French]. Rev mealybug) from verboxide. Ser Khim 7:16031607
Zool Agric Pathol Veg 78(3):8896 Serrano MS, Lapointe SL, Meyerdirk DE (2001)
Passaro LC, Webster FX (2004) Synthesis of the female Attraction of males by virgin females of the mealybug.
sex pheromone of the citrus mealybug, Planococcus Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera:
citri. J Agric Food Chem 52:28962899 Pseudococcidae) Environ Entomol 30(2):339345
Powell W, Pickett JA (2003) Manipulation of parasitoids Shaw PW, Walis DR (2011) Pheromone trap and crop
for aphid pest management: progress and prospects. infestation monitoring of mealybug species in Nelson
Pest Manag Sci 59:149155 apple orchards. N Z Plant Protect 64:291
Rivera SB, Swedlund BD, King GJ, Bell RN, Hussey CE, Shaw P, Wallis D, Charles J (2012) Recent records of the
Shattuck-Eidens DM, Wrobel WM, Peiser GD, mealybug parasitoid Alamella mira Noyes
Poulter CD (2001) Chrysanthemyl diphosphate syn- (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) captured in citrophilus
thase: isolation of the gene and characterization of the mealybug (Pseudococcus calceolariae) sex phero-
recombinant non-head-to-tail monoterpene synthase mone traps in Nelson. The Weta 42:3437
from Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium. Proc Natl Skatteboel L, Stenstroem Y (1989) Facile synthesis of
Acad Sci U S A 98:43734378 racemic 3-acetoxy-2,6-dimethyl-1,5-heptadiene, the
Roelofs WL, Gieselmann MJ, Carde AM, Tashiro H, sex pheromone of the Comstock mealybug. Acta
Moreno DS, Henrick CA, Anderson RJ (1978) Chem Scand 43:9396
198 N. Bakthavatsalam

Smetnik AI, Rozinskaya EM (1988) A new method is Pseudococcidae) in nurseries producing ornamental
introduced. Zashchita Rateni Moskva 3:4243 plants. J Econ Entomol 104(2):555565
Smith HS, Armitage HM (1920) Biological control of Wolk JL, Goldschmidt Z, Dunkelblum E (1986) A short
mealybugs attacking citrus. California Agric Expt Sta stereoselective synthesis of (+)-cisplanococcyl ace-
Bull 9:104158 tate, sex pheromone of the citrus mealybug
Sugie H, Teshiba M, Narai Y, Tsutsumi T, Sawamura N, Planococcus citri (Risso). Synthesis 4:347348
Tabata J, Hiradate S (2008) Identication of a sex Zada A, Dunkelblum E (2006) A convenient resolution of
pheromone component of the Japanese mealybug, racemic lavandulol through lipasecatalyzed acylation
Planococcus kraunhiae (Kuwana). Appl Entomol with succinic anhydride: simple preparation of enan-
Zool 43(3):369375 tiomerically pure (R)-lavandulol. Tetrahedron-
Tabata J, Narai Y, Sawamura N, Hiradate S, Sugie H Asymmetry 17:230233
(2012) A new class of mealybug pheromones: a hemi- Zada A, Harel M (2004) Enzymatic transesterication of
terpene ester in the sex pheromone of Crisicoccus racemic lavandulol: preparation of the two enantiomeric
matsumotoi. Naturwissenschaften 99(7):567574 alcohols and of the two enantiomers of lavandulyl sene-
Tashiro H, Chambers DL (1967) Reproduction in the cioate. Tetrahedron-Asymmetry 15:23392343
California red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Homoptera: Zada A, Dunkelblum E, Assael F, Harel M, Cojocaru M,
Diaspididae). I Discovery and extraction of a female sex Mendel Z, Pellizzari G (2001) Identication of a sec-
pheromone. Ann Entomol Soc Am 60(6):935940 ond sex pheromone component of the vine mealybug.
Tauber O, Sternlicht M, Hefetz A (1985) Preliminary Boll Zool Agrar Bach 33(275):281
observations on the behavior of male Planococcus Zada A, Dunkelblum E, Assael F, Harel M, Cojocaru M,
citri exposed to the synthetic sex pheromone, with ref- Mendel Z (2003) Sex pheromone of the vine mealy-
erence to its applicability for population monitoring. bug, Planococcus cus in Israel: occurrence of a sec-
Phytoparasitica 13:148 ond component in a mass-reared population. J Chem
Teshiba M, Shimizu N, Sawamura N, Narai Y, Sugie H, Ecol 29:977988
Sasaki R, Tabata J, Tsutsumi T (2009) Use of a sex Zada A, Dunkelblum E, Harel M, Assael F, Gross S,
pheromone to disrupt the mating of Planococcus Mendel Z (2004) Sex pheromone of the citrus mealy-
kraunhiae (Kuwana) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). bug Planococcus citri: synthesis and optimization of
Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 53(4):173180 trap parameters. J Econ Entomol 97:361368
Thulasiram HV, Erickson HK, Poulter CD (2008) A com- Zada A, Dunkelblum E, Assael F, Franco JC, da Silva EB,
mon mechanism for branching, cyclopropanation, and Protasov A, Mendel Z (2008) Attraction of
cyclobutanation reactions in the isoprenoid biosyn- Planococcus cus males to racemic and chiral phero-
thetic pathway. J Am Chem Soc 130:19661971 mone baits: ight activity and bait longevity. J Appl
Uchida M, Nakagawa K, Negishi T, Asano S, Mori K Entomol 132(6):480489
(1981) Synthesis of 2,6-dimethyl-1,5-heptadien-3-ol Zhang AJ, Amalin D (2005) Sex pheromone of the female
acetate, the pheromone of the Comstock mealybug pink hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus
Pseudococcus comstocki Kuwana, and its analogs. (Green) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae): biological
Agric Biol Chem Tokyo 45:369372 activity evaluation. Environ Entomol 34:264270
Ujita K, Saeki K (2008) Process for preparation of 2-isop Zhang AJ, Nie JY (2005) Enantioselective synthesis of the
ropenyl-5-methyl-4-hexen-1-yl 3-methyl-2-butenoate. female sex pheromone of the pink hibiscus mealybug,
PCT Int Appl Patent WO 2008075468 Maconellicoccus hirsutus. J Agric Food Chem
Unelius CR, El-Sayed AM, Twidle A, Bunn B, Zaviezo T, 53(7):24512455
Flores MF, Bell V, Bergmann J (2011) The absolute Zhang AJ, Amalin D, Shirali S, Serrano MS, Franqui RA,
conguration of the sex pheromone of the citrophilous Oliver JE, Klun JA, Aldrich JR, Meyerdirk DE,
mealybug, Pseudococcus calceolariae. J Chem Ecol Lapointe SL (2004) Sex pheromone of the pink hibis-
37(2):166172 cus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus, contains an
Vitullo J, Wang S, Zhang A, Mannion C, Bergh JC (2007) unusual cyclobutanoid monoterpene. Proc Natl Acad
Comparison of sex pheromone traps for monitoring Sci U S A 101:96019606
pink hibiscus mealybug (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Zhang AJ, Wang SF, Vitullo J, Roda A, Mannion C, Bergh
J Econ Entomol 100:405410 JC (2006) Olfactory discrimination among sex phero-
Walton VM, Daane KM, Pringle KL (2004) Monitoring mone stereoisomers: chirality recognition by pink
Planococcus cus in South African vineyards with sex hibiscus mealybug males. Chem Sens 31:621626
pheromone-baited traps. Crop Prot 23:10891096 Zou YF, Millar JG (2011) Stereoselective synthesis of the
Walton VM, Daane KM, Bentley WJ, Millar JG, Larsen obscure mealybug pheromone by hydrogenation of a
TE, Malakar-Kuenen R (2006) Pheromone based mat- tetra substituted alkene precursor. Tetrahedron Lett
ing disruption of Planococcus cus (Hemiptera: 52(32):42244226
Pseudococcidae) in California vineyards. J Econ Zou YF, Daane KM, Bentley WJ, Millar JG (2010)
Entomol 99:12801290 Synthesis and bioassay of racemic and chiral trans-
Waterworth RA, Redak RA, Millar JG (2011) Pheromone- alpha-necrodyl isobutyrate, the sex pheromone of the
baited traps for assessment of seasonal activity and grape mealybug Pseudococcus maritimus. J Agric
population densities of mealybug species (Hemiptera: Food Chem 58(8):49774982
Ant Association
15
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

The classic antaphid mutualistic relationship were also observed on grapevines in Europe in
has long been observed by naturalist and ento- association with Phenacoccus aceris (Signoret;
mologist alike, and several studies were con- Sforza 2008).
ducted on the actual/benets and factors involved
in these associations. This type of relationship
between ants and other insects is known to occur 15.1 Benets to Mealybugs
in a number of homopterous groups, especially in
the mealybugs. In the case of mealybugs, the Benets derived by mealybugs are more numer-
degree of dependence on the ants may vary from ous than might be expected.
strong and almost necessary associations to
weak, casual seasonal relationships. The associa-
tion of ants with the mealybugs resulted in the 15.2 Protection from Natural
hypothesis more the ants, more the mealybugs. Enemies
Ants are often associated with mealybugs as hon-
eydew consumers. Hemiptera-tending ants are Ants protect mealybugs from their natural ene-
mostly species of the subfamilies Myrmicinae, mies; this is a very important and long-realized
Dolichoderinae, and Formicinae (Degen and aspect of mealybug benet. Natural enemies are
Gersani 1989; Mittler and Douglas 2003). easily disturbed by movements of the ants. Ants
Samways et al. (1982) reported that 11 % of the are naturally hostile to any quick or obviously
123 ant species identied in citrus orchards in harmful movements around the honeydew
South Africa were associated with mealybugs. sources (Herzig 1938; Nixon 1951). The disrup-
Some mealybugs have an obligatory association tion of the activity of natural enemies by ants pro-
with ants: all Southeast Asian myrmecophilous vides a temporal refuge for mealybugs (Gutierrez
mealybugs have been collected only with ants of et al. 2008). Ants have long been known to aggra-
the genera Acropyga, Dolichoderus, or vate mealybug populations and other honeydew-
Polyrhachis, which attend the mealybugs either producing insect species by disrupting the natural
in subterranean nests or on aerial plant parts biological controls on these species.
(Gullan and Kosztarab 1997). Aboveground nests Ants deter the natural enemies of mealybugs.
There are numerous examples of ants deterring
M. Mani (*) C. Shivaraju the predators and parasites of mealybugs. For
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, instance, ants also reduce parasitism of the cas-
Bangalore 560089, India sava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 199


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_15
200 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Matile-Ferrero (Cudjoe et al. 1993). A wide vari- attending the sucking pests. In Kenya, C. mon-
ety of natural enemies are known to prey on pine- trouzieri, released for the control of Planococcus
apple mealybugs. Ants protect mealybugs from kenyae (LePelley), was eliminated by ants
their natural enemies (Gonzlez-Hernndez et al. (Anderson 1926). The ant Pheidole punctata
1999). In the eld, Pheidole megacephala (F. Smith) was known to destroy the larvae and
(Fabricius) had a positive association with adults of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant
Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Beardsley and a nega- preying on Planococcus citri in South Africa
tive association with the predators of mealybugs (Kirkpatrick 1927). The ineffectiveness of C.
(Jahn and Beardsley 2000). Collectively, P. mega- montrouzieri against Planococcus citri (Risso) at
cephala deters predators from attacking D. neo- Liguria (Italy) was due to the attack of ants such
brevipes. Ants are known to attack the parasitoids as Tapinoma erratium nigerrimum Oryl and
and predators of scales and mealybugs while Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr (Constantino 1935).

Mealybugs and ants on a fruit Ants attending the mealybugs


of noni (Morinda citrifolia)

The presence of Argentine ant, I. humilis, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) showed that
appeared to be partly responsible for the failure all C. montrouzieri introduced were killed and
of Cryptolaemus to become permanently estab- removed in 132.5 min. The mealybugs that asso-
lished in Bermuda (Bennett and Hughes 1959). ciated with ants are indeed protected from attack
In India, the failure of establishment of C. mon- by their predatory natural enemies, although
trouzieri in the mealybug-infested citrus orchards mealybugs and ants do not have an intimate asso-
of Assam was due to the activity of ant Oecophylla ciation (Lai YiChun and Chang NiannTai 2007).
smaragdina (Fab.) (Narayanan 1957). The con- There was an interaction involving the pink
trol of P. citri with Cryptolaemus was made inef- mealybug Sacchariococcus sacchari, the ant
fective in the presence of ant attendants (Panis Camponotus compressus (Fabricius), and the
and Brun 1971). Loss of results with C. mon- predator C. montrouzieri in sugarcane (Srikanth
trouzieri was caused by I. humilis in France et al. 2001). C. montrouzieri was found more in
(Greathead 1976). The ants Cremaster and numbers and proved successful against the
Iridomyrmex were known to prey on C. mon- mealybugs in the absence of ants (Van der Goot
trouzieri (Collins and Scott 1982). The failure of 1948; Murray 1982). In South Africa, the control
ant control is detrimental to biological control of of ants like I. humilis and Anoplolepis custodiens
citrus mealybug (Singh 1978; Narayanan 1957). F. aided the predator C. montrouzieri to give very
The observation of the protective behavior of P. good control of P. citri (Greathead 1971). Poutiers
megacephala against the attack of C. montrouz- (1922) also suggested protecting C. montrouzieri
ieri on the pink hibiscus mealybug from I. humilis in France.
15 Ant Association 201

Protection of mealybugs from predators

Associations among invasive species of ants However, some mealybug predators, such as
and mealybugs are very important in their suc- coccinellids, apparently become tolerated by ants
cess in new locations (Helms and Vinson 2002). by mimicking the waxy body cover of the mealy-
The Argentine ant Linepithema humile (formerly bugs (Daane et al. 2007). This condition of para-
Iridomyrmex humilis) (Mayr) is an example of an sitepredator adaptation is often observed. The
invasive ant species that is a signicant pest in type of ladybird beetle larva is usually very mealy
both natural and managed habitats, and it is com- in appearance and blends in well with its pseudo-
monly associated with mealybug outbreaks coccid host. Thus, the parasite or predator spe-
(Daane et al. 2006; Silverman and Brightwell cies is well adapted to the use of ant-attended
2008). hosts. Ladybird beetle predators are often found
Saying that ants protect mealybugs from among formicid attendants. Ants seem unable to
natural enemies does not necessarily mean that recognize the ladybird beetle larva as a predator.
ants are attacking the natural enemies to save There is, therefore, little doubt that the seemingly
honeydew as a food resource. Ants deter the nat- mimetic resemblance of the beetle larva to the
ural enemies of mealybugs (Jahn and Beardsley mealybug is an aid to its more perfect predaceous
1994; Rohrbach et al. 1988). The encyrtid para- habitat. Another possible mealybug parasite
sitoid Anagyrus ananatis Gahan of pineapple adaptation has been noted in a species of y
mealybug is not only scared away from when larva. This larva apparently remains outside its
ants are present but they are also rarely killed by hosts body and extracts food externally. This
predators such as the ladybird beetles. When ants habit would seem to make it readily susceptible
are absent, the parasitoid is highly effective in to the attack by ants. In order to overcome the
lowering the mealybug populations in pineapple problem, the larva is always found completely
plantings. Ant and mealybug interactions were hidden beneath the mealybug, and only when the
studied in a pineapple eld near Honolu on the host insect is removed can the larva be seen.
island of Maui, Hawaii. Big-headed ant Pheidole
megacephala was found to have a positive asso-
ciation with gray pineapple mealybug 15.3 Ant Constructions
Dysmicoccus neobrevipes but no association
with Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell). Sticky Ants protect the mealybugs from adverse weather
trap collections revealed that D. neobrevipes and by building earthen shelters around them and
D. brevipes are dispersed by the wind. The posi- moving them to protected places; and some ant
tive association between P. megacephala and D. species actively construct shelters for mealybugs
neobrevipes was not due to ants transporting that provide some protection from unfavorable
mealybugs but could have resulted from ants environments and natural enemies (Franco et al.
deterring natural enemies or removing honeydew 2000; Helms and Vinson 2002; McLeod et al.
(Gary and Beardsley 2000). 2002). There are two main types of ant construc-
202 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

tions which are important to mealybugs. The rst drops of rain, although the tent itself is in no way
is the actual ants nest and the second is the so- waterproof. Second, the tent, which has only one
called carton or ant tent. The latter is not important very small entrance, is important in shielding the
in California, although Wheeler (1926) mentioned mealybugs from large parasites. Apparently, the
several instances of carton nests in North mealybug parasites are unable to either nd the
America. Ant-nest isolation of the mealybugs is tent entrance or push their way through. Although
considered quite important and has been observed there are many records of tent parasitism, the rate
on several occasions in California. In one instance, of incidence is much lower than where no protec-
Phenacoccus artemisiae Ehrhorn was found in tion is afforded.
some of the upper chambers of a Crematogaster
nest. These mealybug specimens were found at
least 2 ft from the nearest host plant and in two 15.4 Removal of Honeydew
instances were being transported in the mandibles
of an ant. This particular collection was made in Ants prevent the accumulation of honeydew by
early February, which is a time of very low insect consuming it (Jahn and Beardsley 1994; Rohrbach
activity and high precipitation rate. The mealybugs et al. 1988). Honeydew accumulation, and the
were quiescent for the most part and were found in sooty mold that can grow on honeydew, may be
close contact with one another on the ceiling of ant detrimental to mealybugs. These ants, especially
nest chambers. It seems likely also that parasite P. megacephala, have been blamed for protecting
protection would be important. them against their natural enemies while remov-
Fungus is also a parasite of mealybugs, ing the excess honeydew produced by the mealy-
although infestation is not normally observed bugs (Gonzlez-Hernndez et al. 1999).
until the pseudococcid has been mounted; when One of the direct benets of ant association to
examining mealybug preparations, however, fun- mealybugs is shown in relation to the production
gus infestation is often seen. Ant-nest protection of honeydew and the subsequent contamination
from a highly humid environment is therefore an of the honeydew and source insect with sooty
important factor in mealybug welfare and is prob- mold. Because this fungus contaminant is often
ably directly connected with protection from fun- the cause of mass destruction of mealybugs, cer-
gus contamination. Protection from harsh winter tain adaptations have been made to rid the mealy-
conditions is perhaps the most important factor of bug of the secretion. Ants remove honeydew
ant-nest benet to mealybugs in California. from mealybugs, thereby preventing fungi from
For the most part, ant tents are important in the attacking mealybugs, and the removal of honey-
tropical areas, where two primary types are found. dew prevents contamination, which may be espe-
The rst is constructed with the silk-forming cially detrimental to rst-instar nymphs (Cudjoe
glands of the ant larvae. The adult, which has no et al. 1993; Daane et al. 2006, 2007; Gullan and
silk gland, holds a larva in its mandibles and forces Kosztarab 1997; Moreno et al. 1987). Rohrbach
the immature form to produce its silken product in et al. (1988) hypothesized that honeydew feeding
the desired area. The ant genus Oecophylla is well by ants could benet mealybugs by preventing
known for this habit. The second type of tent is the accumulation of honeydew on the mealybugs
made of earth, paper formed by the ant, and themselves. Presumably, immature mealybugs
leaves. Any or all of these materials may play a get stuck in honeydew and die if ants do not
role in the tent construction. The tents are nor- remove it. Phenacoccus alieni McKenzie is
mally built over mealybug colonies which may known to squirt a small globule of honeydew
have as many as 1,200 individuals. Tent dimen- from the anus to a distance of over 4 in.. This
sions have been recorded up to 4.5 2.3 in. distance is at least 20 times the total length of the
Mealybug-derived benets are twofold. First, insect and shows that mealybugs are quite capa-
the tent provides some protection from direct ble of ejecting honeydew to distances well out of
15 Ant Association 203

the range of their personal contamination. When nest. Ants are the primary or sole means of
ants are in attendance, they remove the honeydew mealybug dispersal in pineapple. Illingworth
as described above, thus eliminating the problem (1931) observed P. megacephala carrying mealy-
of sooty-mold contamination. Because of this, bugs from one cage of pineapples to another. The
ant-attended mealybug colonies are quite often big-headed ant Pheidole megacephala. (F.),
very dense with little distance between individu- Argentine ant Linepithema humile (Mayr), and
als to allow for honeydew ejection. re ant Solenopsis geminata (F.) are commonly
However, in Californias coastal vineyards, found in the Hawaiian pineapple agroecosystem,
Argentine ants increased densities of the obscure where they tend pink pineapple mealybugs
mealybug Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret), pri- (PPM) and gray pineapple mealybugs (GPM) for
marily by removing the honeydew that impedes honeydew. These ants, especially P. megaceph-
the movement of crawlers. Meanwhile, the larvae ala, have been blamed for dispersing mealybugs
of C. montrouzieri successfully forage in patches (Gonzlez-Hernndez et al. 1999).
of high mealybug density. One hypothesis is that
larvae of C. montrouzieri, being also covered
with waxy structures, successfully mimic mealy- 15.6 Benet to Ants
bugs and avoid detection by ants. Furthermore,
when approached by an ant, the coccinellid larva Access to honeydew has been shown to enhance
stops moving and lowers its body against sub- the rate of increase of ant colonies. Honeydew
strate, thus better resembling a sessile mealybug. accounts for more than half of the diet of many
The ants move around the larva, and stroke it temperate wood ants (Formica spp.), and it is the
with their antennae like they stroke the mealy- dominant food source of some subterranean ants
bug. After failing to obtain the honeydew, the ant (Mittler and Douglas 2003). Mealybug exudates/
moves away. Densities of C. montrouzieri were honeydew is highly acidic (pH 3) with fructose
higher on ant-tended vines, where there were (45 g), glucose (20 %), and other sugar contents
more mealybugs (Daane et al. 2007). in negligible quantity (02 %) per 100 g of solids
Ants stimulated increased feeding by mealy- (Ashbolt and Inkerman 1990). The normal ant
bugs; tending by the ants may have other effects mealybug association when observed in the eld
that alter mealybug densities: It may also improve is seemingly quite simple. The ants, which may
the mealybugs habitat or tness (Daane et al. be of various genera, normally move busily from
2007). In the presence of ants, mealybugs are one mealybug specimen to another. When a
able to ingest larger quantities of sap (Degen and mealybug is contacted, the ant begins to fondle
Gersani 1989). In several instances, ant-tended the mealybug with its antennae just as it might
mealybug colonies will be much larger than colo- fondle its own brood.
nies of the same mealybug species on the same The ants rest their heads on the dorsum of the
host that are not tended by ants. Therefore, out- mealybugs near the area of the ostioles for hon-
wardly the ants presence must be of some benet eydew. Mealybugs extrude a solution from their
to the mealybug, either directly or indirectly. ostioles when disturbed. This is possibly a
defense mechanism. When Phenacoccus echeve-
ria McKenzie is purposefully disturbed, it
15.5 Transportation of Mealybugs extrudes two small globules of honeydew through
its posterior ostioles. An ant then comes along
Ants are known to transport the mealybugs from and within a few seconds ingests all of the
plant to plant between and within elds, thus extruded honeydew. It is clear that ants benet
facilitating mealybug dispersal. In California, it from mealybugs in receiving honeydew from
is often possible to see ant Camponotus actually them, which is added to the ants food supply.
carrying from its host plant, directly into the ants The amount that ants rely on honeydew for their
204 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

existence varies greatly with the species involved. 15.7 Predatory Effect of Ants
Some ants seem almost entirely unknown
whether this adaptation to aid in procuring hon- A nal direct benet not often realized, but per-
eydew, or whether this is the normally in an adap- haps a factor of importance in the understanding
tation to aid in procuring honeydew or whether of the biological control of mealybugs, is that
the normally indigestible wax is actually used in some ants actively regulate the population size of
ants diet. their hosts. It has been demonstrated that certain
ant species will actually keep the mealybug pop-
ulation down to a size which they can control,
thus eliminating production of honeydew. The
ants regulate any excessive build-up of popula-
tion by killing a number of mealybugs, and con-
suming the mealybugs is considered a supplement
to the protein portion of the ant diet (Way 1963).
This habit is also of importance in eliminating
sooty-mold contamination in the mealybug col-
ony. Some ant species may switch between tend-
ing and preying on mealybugs (Degen and
Gersani 1989; Mittler and Douglas 2003; Way
1963). The predatory role of ants on the mealy-
bugs is very meager in the regulation of
mealybugs.
Globule of honeydew

A third and nal benet has been mentioned 15.8 Strange Aspects of Ant
earlier and deals with the use of associated Mealybug Associations
mealybug as a source of protein. Although preda-
ceous non-honeydew-consuming ants are not Exceedingly unusual observations were made by
known to attend mealybugs just for protein, some Bunzli in relation to an association between the
ants, which have both honeydew-consuming and mealybug Neorhizoecus coffeae (Laing) and the
predaceous habits, will occasionally kill mealy- ant Acropyga paramaribensis (Borgmeier). The
bugs and use them for protein. In nutritional eggs and immature mealybugs were kept in
value, honeydew is more complete than might be chambers with eggs and larvae of the ant. The
expected. It may contain free amino acids, immature female mealybugs apparently served as
amides, proteins, many minerals, and B vitamins honeydew sources. When the mealybug matured,
(Way 1963). The honeydew may vary greatly in it no longer produced honeydew and was then
its content depending on the species of mealy- transported by the worker ants to a separate
bug, the host plant, the age of plant, the part of mealybug chamber. The eggs that are laid by the
plant upon which mealybugs are feeding, and the mature females are then carried back to the brood
length of time that the insect feeds. Normally, a chambers. This association is not too unusual.
complete diet of honeydew will not compensate The extraordinary part of the relationship is the
for a protein deciency in the ant, and supple- fact that the winged virgin female ants, when
mentary protein must be added to correct the leaving the nest on their nuptial ight, always
situation. carry in their mandibles a fertilized female
There are several records of ants keeping mealybug. This mealybug will soon be the begin-
mealybugs pseudo wax-free. Ants might use ning of the honeydew source of a newly formed
mealybug wax for some nutritive value. Acropyga nest.
15 Ant Association 205

Another exceptional transport association is Hawaii. Ant and mealybug populations in


described by Reyne (1954) in Java. In this case, infested plots increased gradually and appeared
mealybug Hippeococcus is especially adapted to be strongly inuenced by the phenology of the
with long raptorial legs and sucker-like digitules pineapple plants during the rst fruit crop.
for clinging of Dolichoderus ants. When dis- Unusually heavy rainfall caused the dramatic
turbed, the highly mobile immature mealybugs reduction in ant populations observed then.
climb onto the bodies of the ants and are carried Highest ant population levels occurred about 3
into the nest where large colonies of mealybugs years after planting, when all untreated plots
are maintained. became nearly uniformly infested. The incidence
In California, an exceptional relationship of mealybug wilt was higher when the ants and
existed between the mealybug, Cryptoripersia mealybugs were more (John et al. 1982).
salina (Ehrhorn) and the ant Crematogaster. The
mealybugs are enclosed in a white-felted sac at
maturity under rocks. When a rock was over- 15.9 Management of Ants
turned, the mealybugs were all in one large cham-
ber in the ants nest and were in great numbers, The association of ants with the mealybugs by
mostly matured mealybugs. Once the rock had giving protection to natural enemies, transport of
been overturned, masses of ants poured from the mealybugs, and removal of honeydew from the
lower tunnels of the nest in pursuit of their hon- mealybug colonies has resulted in an increase in
eydew symbionts. Within a matter of 15 min the mealybug population. It serves the basis to
the mealybug chamber had been emptied of its develop the hypothesis more the ants, more the
mealybug contents. mealybugs. Hence, it is necessary to check the
Another unusual observation was made in activity of ants in the suppression of mealybugs.
Modoc County involving an association between According to Mansou et al. (2012), the ants
the mealybug Phenococcus colemani Ehrhorn Tapinoma nigerrimum constitute a threat to bio-
and the ant Formica subpolita. This mealybug is logical control of Planococcus cus (Signoret)
very often found in cracks and pits on the under- and Pl. citri in the orchards in Italy by either the
side of larvae rocks. When the mealybug-infested encyrtid parasitoids Anagyrus pseudococci
rock was distributed, associated ants hurriedly (Girault) and Leptomastix dactylopii (How.) or
tore the mealybugs, waxy sacs and all, from their larval stage of the coccinellid predator
rock habitat and carried them into cracks in the Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, and hence an ade-
soil. The ants removed the mealybug so rapidly quate control of the ants is highly recommended
that, in order to collect sufcient numbers of the before the release of any of these natural
mealybugs, the ants had to be removed rst. enemies.
Another unusual observation was made in General ant control measures may be adopted
Nevada. Ants were busily tending their mealybug to suppress the activity of ants. It has been sug-
host in the usual fondling manner. In this case, gested to apply a band of diazinon granules
the mealybugs were withholding their honeydew around the plant about 1 ft from the main stem.
supply from the ants. The ants, however, had Other control measures include destruction of ant
overcome this problem by butting the abdomen holes, red ant nests, and skirting of trees after
of the mealybug with their heads, thus causing fruit harvest, which prevents the ant migration
the honeydew to ow from the mealybug osti- through side branches. After the patrolling (up
oles. The ants then consumed the solution. and down) of ants on the trunk is stopped, the
There was another kind of interrelationships beetles can be released (Singh 1978). It was also
of big-headed ants, mealybugs, and spread of suggested that ants should be prevented by rub-
mealybug wilt disease. The big-headed ant, bing magnesia or powdered tale in a 4-in.-wide
Pheidole megacephala (Fabricius), is the domi- band at the time of liberation of Cryptolaemus
nant ant species in most of the pineapple elds in (Constantino 1935). Mealybug-infested custard
206 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

apple plants were applied with sticky bands an acceptable level in 23 years. The baits need
which had helped to prevent the movement of to be placed in the eld during budbreak (March
ants (Murray 1982). BHC solution (5 g/l) was to June, depending upon location in the state) at a
poured into the anthills prior to the release of C. rate of 1520 bait stations (UC bait station) per
montrouzieri against Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) acre (Nyamukondiwa and Addison 2011). Ants
in guava orchards (Mani et al. 1990). In the can also be managed by applying tanglefoot
orchards where ants were partially excluded, a every 12 weeks.
signicant reduction in citrus mealybug popula-
tions and damage could be observed (Villalba
et al. 2006). Applying a 6 % solution of chlorpy- References
riphos to the base of the vine and supporting
stake and to the surrounding soil gave the best Anderson TJ (1926) Report of entomologist. Rep Dept
Agric Kenya 135147
results.
Ashbolt NJ, Inkerman PA (1990) Acetic acid bacterial
Liquid ant baits were evaluated for the control biodata of the pink sugar cane mealybug
of Argentine ants Linepithema humile (Mayr) Sacchariococcus sacchari and its environs. Appl
and associated mealybug pests (Pseudococcus Environ Microbiol 56(3):707712
Beardsley JW, Su TH, McEwen FL, Gerling D (1982)
species) in commercial vineyards. In all trials,
Field investigations of the interrelationships of the
liquid baits were an insecticide dissolved in 25 % big-headed ant, the gray pineapple mealybug, and
sugar water. In 2002, a liquid bait thiameth- pineapple mealybug wilt disease in Hawaii. Proc
oxam, mixed at 0.0001 % (active ingredient, Hawaii Entomol Soc 24:5167
Bennett FD, Hughes IW (1959) Biolgoical control of
A.I.) was delivered in ground-based (site 1) and
insect pests of Bermuda. Bull Entomol Res
canopy-based (site 2 and 3) dispensers that were 50:423436
recharged every 2 weeks and cleaned every 4 Chun LY, Tai CN (2007) The association of pink hibiscus
weeks, and deployed at rates of 160 (sites 1 and mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) with
bigheaded ant Pheidole megacephala (Fabricius) on
2) and 620 (site 3) dispensers per hectare. There
hibiscus [Chinese]. Formosan Entomol 27:229243
was a signicant reduction of season-long ant Collins L, Scott JN (1982) Interactions of ants, predators
densities in liquid bait treatments at all sites and and the scale insect Pulvinariella mesembryanthem on
of mealybug densities at two of three sites; crop Carpobrotus edulis, an exotic plant naturalized in
Western Australia. Aust Entomol Mag 8(5):7375
damage was signicantly lower in the liquid bait
Constantino G (1935) Unnemicodel contonela degli-
treatment at all sites. Similarly, studies in the agrumi: Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. Acireale R
pineapple eld showed that eradication of the Staz Sper de Fruttic e Agrumic Bol (ns) 6:7
ants reduced the population of mealybug Cudjoe AR, Neuenschwander P, Copeland MJW (1993)
Interference by ants in biological control of the cas-
(Beardsley et al. 1982).
sava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti (Hemiptera:
Gourmet ant bait (Innovative Pest Control Pseudococcidae) in Ghana. Bull Entomol Res
Products, Florida USA), containing 1 % diso- 83:1522
dium octaborate tetrahydrate toxicant, dissolved Daane KM, Sime KR, Hogg BN, Bianchi ML, Cooper
ML, Rust MK, Klotz JH (2006) Effects of liquid
in 25 % sucrose solution to make 0.5 % A.I., was
insecticide baits on Argentine ants in Californias
overall the most preferred bait for Argentine ants coastal vineyards. Crop Prot 25:592603
Linepithema humile (Mayr), common pugna- Daane KM, Sime KR, Fallon J, Cooper ML (2007)
cious ants Anoplolepis custodiens (F. Smith) and Impacts of Argentine ants on mealybugs and their
natural enemies in Californias coastal vineyards. Ecol
cocktail ants Crematogaster peringueyi (Emery)
Entomol 32:583596
during spring, summer, and autumn, and on some Degen AA, Gersani M (1989) Environmental effects on
occasions being signicantly more preferable to activity and honeydew collection by the weaver ant
ants than the control solution. Management of Polyrhachis simplex (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)
when attending the mealybug Trabutina sp
Argentine ants is important in mealybug manage-
(Homoptera, Pseudococcidae). J Zool 218:421432
ment in a vineyard because the ants will protect Franco JC, Silva EB, Carvalho JP (2000) Mealybugs
the mealybugs. Ant baits, placed in approved dis- (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae) associated with citrus in
pensers, can reduce Argentine ant populations to Portugal. ISA Press, Lisbon (in Portuguese)
15 Ant Association 207

Gary CJ, Beardsley JW (2000) Interactions of Ants McLeod P, Diaz J, Vasquez L, Johnson DT (2002) Within-
(Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Mealybugs plant distribution and sampling of mealybugs in plan-
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) on Pineapple. Proc tain var. FHIA 21. Trop Agric 79:150153
Hawaii Entomol Soc 34:161165 Mittler TE, Douglas AE (2003) Honeydew. In: Resh VH,
Gonzlez-Hernndez H, Johnson MW, Reimer NJ (1999) Card RT (eds) Encyclopedia of insects. Academic,
Impact of Pheidole megacephala (F.) (Hymenoptera: Amsterdam
Formicidae) on the biological control of Dysmicoccus Moreno DS, Haney PB, Luck RF (1987) Chlorpyrifos and
neobrevipes (Cockerell) (Homoptera: diazinon as barriers to argentine ant (Hymenoptera,
Pseudococcidae). Biol Control 15(2):145152 Formicidae) foraging on citrus trees. J Econ Entomol
Greathead DJ (1971) A review of biological control in the 80:208214
Ethiopian region. Common Inst Biol Control Tech Murray DAH (1982) Effects of sticky banding of custard
Comm 5:162 apple tree trunks on ants and citrus mealybug
Greathead DJ (1976) A review of biological control in Planococcus citri (Risso) (Pseudococcidae,
western and Southern Europe. Common Inst Biol Hemiptera) in South Eastern Queensland. Queensland
Control Tech Comm 7:182 J Agric Animal Sci 39:141146
Gullan PJ, Kosztarab M (1997) Adaptations in scale Narayanan R (1957) A note on the performance of
insects. Annu Rev Entomol 42:2350 Cryatolaemus montrouzieri Bul. in citrus orchards at
Gutierrez AP, Daane KM, Ponti L, Walton VM, Ellis CK Burnihat (Assam). Tech Bull Commonw Inst Biol
(2008) Prospective evaluation of the biological control Cont 9:137138
of vine mealybug: refuge effects and climate. J Appl Nixon GEJ (1951) The association of ants with aphids and
Ecol 45:524536 coccids. Commonwealth Institute of Entomology,
Helms KR, Vinson SB (2002) Widespread association of London, 36 p
the invasive ant Solenopsis invicta with an invasive Nyamukondiwa C, Addison P (2011) Preference of forag-
mealybug. Ecology 83:24252438 ing ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) for bait toxicants
Herzig J (1938) Ameisen und Blattlause. Ztschr f Angew in South African vineyards. Crop Prot 30:10341038
Ent 24:367435 Panis A, Brun J (1971) Biological control tests against
Illingworth JF (1931) Preliminary report on evidence that three species of psuedococcidae (Homoptera:
mealybugs are an important factor in pineapple wilt. Coccoidea) in green house. Revue Zool Agric Path
J Econ Entomol 24:877889 Veg 70:4247
Jahn GC, Beardsley JW (1994) Big-headed ants, Pheidole Poutiers R (1922) Lacclimitation de Cryotolaemus mon-
megacephala: interference with the biological control trouzieri Muls. Dans le midi de la France Ann des
of gray pineapple mealybugs. In: Williams DF (ed) Epiphyt 8:318
Exotic ants: biology, impact and control of introduced Reyne A (1954) Hippeacoccus, a new genus of
species. Westview Press, Oxford, pp 199205 Pseudococcidae from Java with peculiar habits.
Jahn GC, Beardsley JW (2000) Interactions of ants Leyden Rijks Mues Van Natuurlijke His Zool Meded
(Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and mealybugs 32:233257
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) on pineapple. Proc Rohrbach KG, Apt WJ (1986) Nematode and disease
Hawaii Entomol Soc 34:181185 problems of pineapple. Plant Dis 70:8187
John W, Jr B, Sip TH, McEwen FL, Gerling D (1982) Rohrbach KG, Beardsley JW, German TL, Reimer NJ,
Field investigations on the interrelationships of the Sanford WG (1988) Mealybug wilt, mealybugs, and
big-headed ant, the gray pineapple mealybug, and ants of pineapple. Plant Dis 72(7):558565
pineapple mealybug wilt disease in Hawaii! Proc Samways MJ, Nel M, Prins AJ (1982) Ants (Hymenoptera:
Hawaiian Entomol Soc 24(1):5167 Formicidae) foraging in citrus trees and attending
Kirkpatrick ZW (1927) Biological control of insect pests honey-producing Homoptera. Phytophylactica
with particular reference to the control of common 14:155157
mealybug in Kenya colony. In: Proceedings of the Sforza R (2008) Les cochenilles sur la vigne. In: Bordeaux
South and East Africa Agricultural Conference 1926, Feret (ed) Les ravageurs de la vigne, pp 188210, 389
pp 184196 p
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A, Singh SP (1990) The impact Silverman J, Brightwell RJ (2008) The Argentine ant:
of the predator, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant, challenges in managing an invasive unicolonial pest.
on pesticide-resistant populations of the striped mealy- Annu Rev Entomol 53:231252
bug, (Ckll.) on guava in India. Insect Sci Appl Singh SP (1978) Propagation of a coccinellid beetle for
11(2):167170 the biological control of citrus and coffee mealybugs.
Mansou R, Suma P, Mazzo G, Pergola AS, Pappalardo V, Scientic Conference, CPA, 2 p
Lebdi KG, Russo A (2012) Interactions between the Srikanth J, Easwaramoorthy S, Kurup NK (2001)
ant Tapinoma nigerrimum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Camponotus compressus F. interferes with
and the main natural enemies of vine and citrus mealy- Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant activity in sugar-
bugs (Hemipotera: Pseudococcidae). Biocontrol Sci cane. Insect Environ 7:5152
Technol 22(5):527537
208 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Van der Goot P (1948) Biologishe bestrijding van vitte Pseudococcidae), in citrus orchards [Spanish]. Boletin
luis (Phenacoccus iceryoides) on kofe n de foradja- de Sanidad Vegetal Plagas 32(2):203213
landen (Ziuid Colebes). Meded Alg Proefstn Landb Way MJ (1963) Mutualism between ants and honeydew-
64:12 producing Homoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 8:307344
Villalba M, Vila N, Marzal C, Garcia Mari F (2006) Wheeler WM (1926) Ants, their structure, development
Inuence of inoculative releases of natural enemies and behaviour. Columbia University Press, New York,
and exclusion of ants in the biological control of the 663 p
citrus mealybug Planococcus citri (Hemiptera:
Methods of Control
16
M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Mealybugs pose a serious threat to several agri- ior of mealybugs may provide a spatial refuge
cultural and horticultural crops throughout the from natural enemies and harsh environmental
world. They are a major problem in greenhouses conditions (Berlinger and Golberg 1978;
and nurseries, where they often cause severe eco- Gutierrez et al. 2008a). This type of plant coloni-
nomic damage. It seems surprising that such a zation makes mealybugs practically invisible
delicate soft-bodied insect is so difcult to con- during the latent population phase. However, dur-
trol. There are, however, several reasons which ing outbreaks, the population boils over from
may account for this fact. the refuge and becomes conspicuous. In addition,
Mealybugs developed several different other species have the habit of spending their
defense mechanisms. Many of the species tend to entire lives deep in the soil, protected almost
establish themselves in protected sites, such as from insecticidal materials.
cracks and crevices in bark, leaf axils, root Mealybugs are noted for the production of
crowns, nodes of grass stems, under fruit sepals dermal wax secretions. Adult mealybugs and the
and within fruit navels, between touching fruits nymphal instars are covered with waxy coating.
or fruits and leafs, and in tunnels bored by insect Also the eggs of mealybugs, protected by the
larvae in roots and stems (Franco et al. 2000; waxy lamentous secretions of the ovisac, are
Kosztarab and Kozr 1988). This cryptic behav- almost impossible to reach with insecticides.

M. Mani (*) C. Shivaraju


Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 209


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_16
210 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

Eggs protected with waxy ovisac Adult mealybug covered with Mealybug crawlers not covered
waxy coating with waxy coating

The waxy secretion is the most common con- control of some mealybugs. The purpose of this
spicuous trait of the mealybug family. It is a com- study is not to give specic recommendations for
plex system that serves different functions, and mealybug control. It will be dealt under the
which is produced by the epidermal wax glands respective crops. General methods of mealybug
and transported to the body surface via ducts, control are summarized in this chapter.
pores, and secretory setae of various types (Foldi
1983; Gullan and Kosztarab 1997). The main
components of the wax of ve mealybug species 16.1 Decision-Making System
(Planococcus citri (Risso), Pl. cus (Signoret),
Pl. vovae, Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel, and The ve key elements ought to be considered in a
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead)) were trialkyl decision-making system in the management of
glycerols and wax esters. The wax cover is mealybug population are (1) information on
believed to prevent water loss. The hydrophobic mealybug density, perhaps obtained late in the
property of the wax enables the mealybugs to season, in case of overwintering population; (2)
escape drowning or becoming swamped by water awareness of the population distribution in the
in their typical cryptic sites. The ovisac, which is target area; (3) information about the density of
also a wax secretion, is considered to be an adap- the relevant natural enemies; (4) the density of
tation that protects the offspring from both wet associated insect species, which may increase the
and dry conditions, and that may also provide an damage or render the activity of the natural ene-
attachment to the host plant. Tubular ducts and mies; and (5) the risk of the spread of mealybug-
multilocular disc pores, respectively, produce transmitted viral disease. In this chapter, the
long hollow and shorter curled laments, which current knowledge needed to take actions and to
make up the ovisac and the male cocoon (Cox suggest solutions for different situations is
and Pearce 1983; Foldi 1983). The white wax of reviewed. Based on such knowledge, the grower
mealybugs is strongly light reective and may may select the appropriate control tactics.
reduce desiccation. In some cases, the wax also
serves to cover the honeydew droplets and to pro-
tect the mealybugs from contamination by their 16.2 Monitoring
own honeydew and defensive exudates (Gullan
and Kosztarab 1997). Normally, chemicals are Vigilance is important to eliminate them before
used to control the mealybugs. However, the there is a major outbreak of mealybugs.
crawler stage is not covered with wax, and as a Monitoring for the incidence of mealybugs is a
consequence, this is perhaps one of the most sus- prerequisite to initiate the management practices.
ceptible stages of mealybug to chemicals. On the There are no simple and effective methods to
other hand, natural enemies have given excellent visually monitor the mealybugs, and the process
16 Methods of Control 211

itself can be time consuming and laborious. As and, therefore, the most effective timing for the
exemplied for Pseudococcus maritimus, the management options.
accuracy of monitoring the plant material will
depend on the mealybug population density, and
the number of samples needed for an accurate 16.3 Cultural Method
count is often high because most of the mealy-
bugs have a clumped distribution pattern, often A number of cultural controls are practiced and
being found on only a small percentage of the these vary greatly among regions. Crop sanita-
plants. The appropriate sampling program will tion is useful in reducing the mealybug popula-
also vary throughout the season, depending tion. Before applying the insecticides/pesticides,
largely on mealybug location as there are periods manual removal of the uffy nests and most of
when much of the population is hidden (e.g., the insects is advisable. It greatly increases the
under bark) rather than exposed (e.g., on leaves). chance on complete elimination of the mealy-
In addition, as species have different numbers of bugs. Removal of the weeds harboring the mealy-
annual generations and preferred feeding loca- bugs eliminates the source of mealybug
tions throughout the season, there is not a single infestation. For example, crop sanitation includ-
sampling procedure appropriate for all the mealy- ing the removal of weeds was useful in the con-
bugs. In most cases, signals of an infested plant trol of Heterococcus pulverarius (Newstead)
can be used to aid the sampling program. First, (Dietz and Harwood 1960) and H. nigriensis
ants are closely associated with the mealybugs, Williams (Harris 1961). Burning and plowing the
and their presence can help select the plants for crop after harvest result in very little reoccur-
further sampling. Second, honeydew on the rence of the mealybugs. The control of certain
leaves can also be a good signal; a large popula- garden mealybugs may be done simply by host-
tion hidden under the bark will excrete enough ing the plants down with a strong stream of water
honeydew that the infested trunk region will have (Michelbacher et al. 1959). Although this seems
a darker, wet appearance. Third, as mealybug rather unorthodox, the control is fairly success-
numbers build up, their feeding damage may ful, especially if this treatment is used at regular
cause leaves to turn yellow or brown and drop intervals. In the case of woody plants, mealybugs
from the plant. Finally, during the harvest time, are found underneath the bark of the trunk, cor-
fruits in direct contact with the spurs or trunk are don, spurs, and canes. These locations provide
more likely to be infested, and by selecting these some protection from insecticides, natural ene-
fruits, a higher mealybug count can be made A mies, and environmental conditions. Stripping
faster sampling method is to use sticky traps the bark exposes the mealybugs to these mortal-
baited with sex pheromone to lure in and trap the ity factors. The infested bark should be destroyed
adult winged males. It has long been known that rather than left in the row middles as the mealy-
sexually mature female mealybugs like bugs can move back. Cover crops have been used
Planococcus citri emit a sex pheromone to attract to improve soil health and lower-pest densities by
the winged adult males. These pheromones can increasing the natural enemy numbers or
be synthesized and used in the eld for monitor- diversity.
ing the mealybugs. Thus, the monitoring provides Parasitoids that attack the mealybugs could
essential information for making decisions indi- utilize oral nectaries of some cover-crop species
cating the presence and the numbers of mealy- as a food source to increase adult longevity.
bugs and their enemies occurring in nature; the Generalist predators, such as the lacewings and
degree of natural control by insects, which prey some ladybird beetle species, might also utilize
upon or parasitize the mealybugs; whether the these oral food resources as well as herbivores
mealybugs are high enough to require treatment; in the cover crop as alternate prey. Overly vigor-
the lifecycle stages of any mealybugs present ous plants can increase mealybug populations in
212 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

two ways. First, excess nitrogen has been shown mealybugs because the mealybug waxy covering
to increase the size of mealybug females and the repels polar chemicals (Walton et al. 2004).
number of eggs in each ovisac. Second, the Insecticides, with contact and also systemic
increased foliage associated with overly vigorous activity, are still primarily used to control or reg-
plants provides better shelter for the mealybugs ulate the mealybug populations.
by reducing temperatures inside the vine leaf Normally chemicals are used to control the
canopy, and may reduce the amount of applied mealybugs. There are great similarities among
foliar insecticide that reaches the mealybug. the insecticide arsenals used to control mealybug
Controlling plant vigor is, therefore, a practice species on different crops. In principle, three
that can help improve mealybug control. main modes of insecticide application are
adopted: (1) foliage cover spraying for manage-
ment of aboveground populations; (2) applica-
16.4 Physical Control tion of insecticide solution to the soil to enable it
to penetrate to the root zone, so as to combat sub-
The following physical control measures can be terranean colonies; and (3) chemigation by appli-
adopted to reduce the mealybug population on cation of systemic compounds via the irrigation
the plants: (1) ushing mealybugs off the leaves system (Chemigation), for example, drip irriga-
with water can provide immediate relief but will tion. Insecticides are also used against mealybugs
simply displace the mealybugs; (2) rubbing off by smearing them on the stem or main branches.
and crushing the colonies with a cloth; (3) mealy- For example, swabbing of grapevine trunk/stem
bugs can also be removed by dipping a cotton with chlorpyriphos is recommended to control
swab in alcohol or ngernail polish remover; (4) the mealybugs. Two other, less common, tech-
discarding heavily infested plants; and (5) prun- niques are fumigation, usually applied for eradi-
ing infested tissue off infested plants. cation, for example, with methyl bromide, and
slow-release strips to prevent colonization.

16.4.1 Hot Water Treatment


16.5.1 Neonicotinoids
A quarantine treatment is needed to prevent the
entry and spread of mealybugs like Planococcus More recently, an effective group of compounds
citri (Risso) and Pseudococcus odermatti Miller has been found, which combines toxicity to
and Williams infesting limes. A 20-min, 49 C mealybugs with safety to other non-targeted
hot-water immersion treatment is effective in organisms; they are the neonicotinoids. These
killing all the mealybugs without affecting the compounds act on the central nervous system and
fruit quality (Gould and McGuire 2000). easily replace carbamates, organophosphates, or
pyrethroids, since there are no records of cross-
resistance associated with them. These systemic
16.5 Chemical Control compounds show high effectiveness against
mealybugs. Examples include dinotefuran
Waxy insects such as mealybugs and scale insects applied to the canopy; acetamiprid applied by
are difcult to kill using contact insecticides smearing on the stem or the branches (Gross
because the waxes produced by these insects et al. 2000; Larrain 1999); and imidacloprid and
form a physical barrier preventing chemical pen- thiamethoxam that are introduced by watering
etration. It is essential that the mealybug is killed the soil (Daane et al. 2006; Fu Castillo et al.
promptly, but the cotton-wool cover can repel 2004; Grout and Stephen 2005; Martin and
any insecticide sprayed onto it; therefore, often a Workman 1999; Sazo et al. 2006). The insecti-
wetting agent in the insecticide spray is required. cide arsenal that is both suitable for organic farm-
Many contact insecticides are ineffective against ing and able to cope effectively with mealybug
16 Methods of Control 213

pests does not exist in practice. Since the growers organophosphates such as malathion, diazinon,
will need to treat small hot spots of the mealybug, tetraethyl pyrophosphate (TEPP), and dimefox
it is expected that some soft insecticides will be have been used with partial success but they are
used and that more than one application may be not in use now due to one reason or the other.
needed to selectively eliminate such hot spots. They may be extremely hazardous or can develop
When these hot spots are treated, several points resistance (Madsen and Westgard 1962).
should be taken into account: (1) the hot spots are Malathion is primarily used in the control of gar-
expected to be in areas that are practically free of den and nursery mealybugs (Michelbacher et al.
problematic mealybug populations; they actually 1959). TEPP, another organophosphate, has
constitute oases for parasitoids and predators; effectively controlled P. citri, Ps. longispinus,
therefore, the ratio of mealybug to natural enemy and Ps. maritimus (Jefferson and Pritchard 1961).
populations in the hot spots should be considered Some old organophosphates, such as dichlorvos
before initiation of any control operation; (2) an and chlorpyriphos, are still being used against
insecticide will be applied when augmentation mealybugs because they certainly are much less
with predators is not useful or cannot be imple- dangerous. Many of the chlorinated hydrocar-
mented; (3) a low-residue short-life insecticide is bons, such as dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane
the most appropriate; (4) an augmentation of (DDT), lindane, aldrin, dieldrin, and endrin, and
natural enemies will be needed if the hot spots the organophosphate (parathion) are not in use
are too numerous. now due to various reasons. Eventually, however,
most of these materials became less effective
16.5.1.1 Application Timing also. Organophosphates, such as chlorpyrifos,
Application timing is critical to control mealy- acephate, dichlorvos, and diazinon, and, to a
bugs with most insecticides. Exposed mealybugs lesser extent, carbamates, such as aminocarb,
are more easily killed than those under the bark, carbaryl, thiodicarb, or methomyl, are broad-
and the smaller stages are more susceptible than spectrum nerve insecticides, which have been
the larger mealybugs. This is especially true for used against mealybugs that colonize the plant
insecticides with a short residual period. Much canopy since the early 1960s (Gonzalez et al.
research, therefore, has been aimed at proper 2001; Shafqat et al. 2007). These insecticides
application timing and development of materials when applied in high volume could successfully
with better penetration into the protected habitats overcome the obstacles that make mealybugs
of mealybugs. Applications with systemic insec- hard to kill. The obstacles are as follows: (1) their
ticides near bloom are often used, as the insecti- hydrophobic wax cover, which repels hydrophilic
cide moves quickly in the plants. insecticides; (2) their tendency to feed in hidden
and protected parts of the plant; (3) their typically
dense colonies; and (4) the frequent overlapping
16.5.2 Foliar Spray of generations. Effective control is achieved
when most of the mealybug population is in the
The dispersive habit of the crawler should make dispersive crawler stage or the young nymphal
it more susceptible to insecticides than the later instars, and when the host plant does not provide
developmental stages that live in sheltered sites. effective shelter. However, satisfactory control is
Spray application is to be timed to coincide with often difcult to achieve over an extended period.
the crawler stage as it would be effective and These chemicals have detrimental effects on the
would also permit the use of less persistent environment as a whole and on natural enemies
chemicals. in particular (Anand and Ayub 2000; Babu and
Not many specic insecticides are available Ramanamurthy 1998; Meyerdirk et al. 1982).
against all the species of mealybugs, but para- The multivoltine character of the pest mealybugs
thion was primarily used as spray and dust in and the frequent application of inefcient control
commercial agriculture. In the earlier years, measures accelerate the development of insecti-
214 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

cide resistance (Flaherty et al. 1982). Systemic and thereby improve the insecticide efcacy
organophosphates such as dimethoate could (Cranshaw et al. 2000; Morishita 2005). Summer
overcome some of these obstacles (Grout and oil emulsions/mineral oils are particularly effec-
Stephen 2005; Meyerdirk et al. 1982; Prasad tive in the control of mealybugs on ornamental
et al. 1998). Chlorpyrifos-impregnated strips are plants. Applications should be made at regular
applied to protect banana bunches from the intervals of 13 weeks (Michelbacher et al.
mealybug infestation or applied as stem barriers 1959). Combinations of these oil emulsions with
for the control of ants (Addison 2002; Gross et al. contact insecticides are quite effective in the con-
2001). trol of garden and household mealybugs. Neem
Newer materials, with more novel modes of oil, horticultural oil, and insecticidal soaps are
action, have also gained in popularity, including often regarded as organic or non-chemical
neonicotinoids, insect growth regulators (IGRs), methods, but this is not completely accurate.
botanicals, and biosynthesis inhibitors. However, they are safer than the insecticides.
Application of spirotetramat 6 . oz/acre + adju- They will not provide absolute control over
vant (Ventre 0.25 % v/v) 44 . oz/acre at a spray mealybugs but can drastically reduce their popu-
volume of 137 gal/ac was able to reduce the lations. ChilliGarlic extract is also used to con-
bunch infestation with mealybugs to 3 % fruit trol the mealybugs.
damage and there was little to no honeydew in
that treatment. A major difference between the Botanicals
older and newer materials is the importance of Neem has natural insecticidal properties but is
coverage. As mentioned, a portion of the mealy- biodegradable and non-toxic to several naturally
bug population is often under the bark and, for occurring parasitoids and predators. It works by
some species, on the roots. Many of the older making the leaves unpalatable to the mealybugs.
foliar sprays did not effectively contact and kill Neem is to be sprayed like other contact insecti-
mealybugs in these more protected locations. cides. Spraying should be in such a way that the
Some of the more novel materials have systemic undersides of all leaves are covered. In organic
properties, applied either through the irrigation agriculture, azadirachtin, an IGR chitin inhibitor
system or as a foliar spray. For organic or sustain- derived from the Indian neem tree, may be used
able farming programs, neem, light mineral oils, in similar modes (Irulandi et al. 2001). Pyrethrins
lime sulfur, citrus products, and fatty-acid soaps and rotenone replaced some of the old com-
have been used. pounds in organic agriculture with limited effec-
Another historical difference is that the earlier tiveness. Neem products have a repellent effect
materials were often broad spectrum and killed on some mealybugs. Neem oil is effective for
more than just the targeted mealybugs. The mealybug suppression. Neem oil is generally
extensive use of DDT and other synthetic insecti- considered safe for humans, pets, and plants
cides to control leafhoppers apparently disrupted unlike usual chemical insecticides. Neem oil is
the natural control of the mealybug P. an all-natural organic insecticide. Unlike the
maritimus. toxic chemicals, neem oil interrupts the pest
reproduction cycle and is, therefore, useful in
16.5.2.1 Oil Emulsions/Mineral Oils/ eliminating mealybugs from the plants. Mix
Botanicals 5 ml (1 oz) of pure neem oil with 2.5 ml (1/2 oz)
of a mild liquid soap and 1,000 ml of water (four
Oils cups). Mix neem oil and liquid soap rst and
Oils have long been used for the control of scale then add water. Mix it thoroughly and spray.
insects but they have been ineffective against Neem oil solution smothers the mealybugs;
mealybugs. However, the integration of narrow therefore, complete coverage of all the plant
rened oils with other insecticides was suggested parts is essential. Repeat every 57 days until the
as a means to dissolve the insects wax covering infestation comes under control. Bug Buster is a
16 Methods of Control 215

botanical solution for mealybugs. Two sprays of Dishwashing soap can be used as an effective
Bug Buster are recommended; rst, at a dose of remedy for mealybugs. According to evergrow-
45 ml/l of water at an interval of 35 days and ing.com, combine one tablespoon of dish soap
thereafter, at an interval of 715 days. Bug with one pint of warm water. Mix the solution in
Buster acts as a contact as well as systemic a spray bottle and coat the plants with a layer of
against mealybugs; it penetrates the waxy cover the solution. The soap penetrates the protective
of the insects body and eventually kills them; waxy coat created by mealybugs and kills the
and it disrupts the structure and permeability of pests. Check all areas of the plant, including the
the insect cell membranes. Disruption of cell underside regions, for infestation. Spray every
wall damages the cells resulting in quick killing region of the plant to ensure complete
of the mealybugs. Hence, Bug Buster is very eradication.
effective for all the stages of mealybug, as it is
biodegradable and safe for humans; compatible
with most of the bio-pesticides/-fertilizers; free 16.5.3 Soil Drench
from harmful synthetic chemicals and water sol-
uble; acts as systemic as well as contact against Soil drenching with malathion and parathion
mealybugs; non-hazardous; safe to humans and were partially effective against root mealybugs.
pests; and non-polluting, eco-friendly, and no Heavy infestations of Rhizococcus pritchardi
residual toxicity. Because it is a combination of McKenzie on roots of African violet have been
active natural extracts, there is no possibility of successfully controlled by drenching the potted
developing resistance (http://www.ehow.com/ plants dimethoate (Snetsinger 1966). At present,
list_7578648_home- remedies- mealybugs. the mealybug management is based on chemical
html#ixzz2sd1mn MBI). Unripe fruit extract of treatments, primarily with neonicotinoid insecti-
the plant Balanites aegyptiaca showed inhibition cides (e.g., imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, clo-
of the mealybug Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) thianidin). These are typically applied as a soil
after the third day of spraying. No mealybugs drench directed to the roots. Soil drench applica-
were observed on the leaf on the seventh day of tions of imidacloprid is highly effective in reduc-
the application (Wabale et al. 2010). About 90 % ing the mealybug populations, particularly when
mortality of Planococcus citri was obtained with applied at 0.525-g ai/vine makes it extremely
pepper and eucalyptus extract at 3,500 ppm effective. In California, the mealybugs were also
(Ahmadi et al. 2012). controlled when imidacloprid was applied
through irrigation lines or into furrows (Sazo
Horticultural Oil et al. 2006). A further benet of soil drenching is
Horticultural oils are petroleum distillates. They that the insecticide is transported to the pest with-
are to be applied underneath leaves, on pots, and out harming the predators and parasitoids and
areas surrounding the plants. These oils (if not can be applied before they are active. Under this
phytotoxic) should not be applied to plants when condition, imidacloprid could be used to kill
temperature is greater than 85 F or in direct mealybugs on the roots of the plants. Imidacloprid
sunlight. soil treatments have good residual activity and
the control is sustained even up to 2 years.
Insecticidal Soaps Systemic insecticides are applied preventa-
Insecticidal soaps are a solution of synthetic tively to the growing medium as a drench or as a
pyrethroids mixed with a mild detergent made granule for uptake or absorption via the roots and
from petroleum products. These soaps (if not then translocated throughout the plant through
phytotoxic) should be applied underneath leaves, the vascular system. Most systemic insecticides
on pots, and areas surrounding the plants and are translocated through the plant via the transpi-
should also be used on greenhouse vegetables. ration stream, which is the movement of water
216 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

through the plant by means of the xylem- or in the best control of Planococcus citri (Risso)
water-conducting tissues. They are primarily infesting the gardens (Bivins and Deal 1973).
active on phloem-feeding insect pests with pierc-
ingsucking mouthparts, such as mealybugs, as
these insect pests feed exclusively within the 16.5.4 Insect Growth Regulators
xylem vessel elements or phloem sieve tubes.
During the feeding process, these insects with- The chemicals having the IGR activity are used
draw and ingest lethal concentrations of the sys- to reduce the mealybug population. For example,
temic insecticides active ingredient and are the IGR ZR-777 (prop-2-ynyl 3,7,11-trimethyl-
subsequently killed. There are a number of (2E,4E)-dodecadienoate), gave good control of
advantages associated with using drench or gran- nymphs in all instars of Planococcus citri (Risso)
ular applications of systemic insecticides com- receiving 0.01 % sprays. One foliar application
pared to foliar sprays. For instance, drench of ZR-777 gave good control of Pseudococcus
applications reduce exposure to workers and longispinus (Targ.) and Phenacoccus solani
natural enemies, such as parasitoids and preda- Ferris after 5 days of application. The IGRs, such
tors. In addition, systemic insecticides are trans- as buprofezin, a chitin-synthesis inhibitor, or kin-
located through the plant vascular system oprene, which mimics juvenile hormone, were
including the xylem and phloem, protecting the sought as replacements for organophosphates
growth that would have been missed when apply- and carbamates in controlling mealybugs; they
ing a contact insecticide, as well as any new have been considered a suitable alternative
growth following the application. This may pro- because they exhibit low human toxicity. They
vide protection for extended periods of time. are more selective to many benecial species and
Furthermore, applying systemic insecticides as they are specically targeted at processes
drenches reduces the amount of material lost due involved in particular stages of mealybug devel-
to evaporation, light degradation, and irrigation opment. However, many of the IGRs are toxic to
(wash-off). ladybeetles (James 2004; Cloyd and Dickinson
2006). Buprofezin is a commonly applied IGR
16.5.3.1 Soil Application against mealybugs (Muthukrishnan et al. 2005);
Soil application of granular insecticides, namely however, its effectiveness is mainly limited to
phorate, disyston, and aldicarb, has been recom- eggs and young stages, so that the adult females
mended to control the mealybugs. Phorate has may escape the consequences of the treatment.
been used in the control of Heterococcus pulver- Buprofezin also suffers from the same limitations
arious (Dietz and Harwood 1960), Ferrisia vir- as other foliar-sprayed compounds. Buprofezin
gata (Ckll.), Planococcoides njalensis (Laing), (Applaud) is emerging as a prime control tool for
and Ps. comstocki (Kuwana) (Abrahao and mealybugs. When applied, for three seasons, the
Mamprim 1958). Disyston has been used in the chemical works extremely well for the mealy-
control of Dysmicoccus brevipes (Ckll) (Carter bugs. It is an IGR, and great control is achieved
and Gortner 1958). while allowing benecial insects to continue
Aldicarb granules applied in soil resulted in feeding with no notable disruption. Chlorpyriphos
excellent control of Maconellicoccus hirsutus is by far the most popular pre-harvest material,
(Green) (Mani and Thontadarya 1991). In but buprofezin can also be applied post harvest.
Shanghai region, aldicarb (5 %) granules mixed The IGR Applaud provides effective control of
in soil around the ornamental succulent other sucking pests like soft scales, ash whitey,
Kalanchoe blossfeldiana plant roots or 40 % etc. The active ingredient, buprofezin, is
omethoate 100 poured over the roots resulted in extremely effective against crawler and nymph
97 % control of Planococcus citri (Tang et al. stages of these pests by inhibiting chitin biosyn-
1992). Aldicarb when applied as 10 % granules thesis. Application of the juvenile hormone ana-
into the soil with a drench of l water/plant resulted logue epofenonane (RO 103108) at 10 ppm,
16 Methods of Control 217

together with adjuvants, inhibited the male and impacts of the semiochemicals are limited to the
female development of Pseudococcus calceolar- target pest organisms. The potential of mealybug
iae (Mask.) (Rotundo 1978). sex pheromones as an alternative and ecologi-
cally friendly means for monitoring and control
16.5.4.1 Pesticides Known to Control is important and promising. Sex pheromones are
Mealybugs used in lures for monitoring, for detection of out-
Pesticides that are known to control mealybugs breaks, and for population management.
are as follows: acephate, acetamiprid, azadi- Monitoring systems provides vital information
rachtin, bendiocarb, bifenthrin, buprofezin, car- for the timing of insecticide applications.
baryl, chlorpyrifos, clothianidin, Population levels can be reduced or controlled by
cyuthrin + chlorpyrifos, cyuthrin + imidaclo- mass trapping, mating disruption, or lure and kill.
prid, diazinon, dimethoate, fenpropathrin, onic- The success of these methods depends on the
amid, uvalinate, imidacloprid, kinoprene, availability of the pheromone and on an appropri-
lambda-cyhalothrin, malathion, permethrin, pyri- ate formulation and deployment. In contrast to
proxyfen, S-kinoprene, and thiamethoxam. the extensive use of sex pheromones in control-
ling the beetle and moth pests, sex pheromones
16.5.4.2 Precautions are not yet employed in the control operation of
Pesticides can provide short-term control but are scale insects (Franco et al. 2009).
not recommended for long-term control because
mealybugs often persist in hard-to-reach areas.
Mealybugs are most susceptible to chemicals 16.6 Biological Control
when they are in the crawler stage. A waiting
period of at least 2 weeks after using pesticides Although it is apparent that many problems arise
before releasing the biological control agents is when chemicals are applied for the control of any
needed. High-volume wet sprays are needed in insects, some of these aftereffects warrant special
order to penetrate the waxy coating that protects mention in the case of mealybug control. Often
mealybugs. It may take a series of applications at when applications of insecticides are made for
10- to 14-day intervals to control mealybugs. the control of certain mealybugs, instead of caus-
Repeated use of the same pesticide or the pesti- ing a decrease in the mealybug population, an
cide combination more than three times in a row outbreak is also noted. The density of a Japanese
should be avoided. mealybug, Planococcus kraunhiae, on Japanese
persimmon fruit was higher in plots frequently
16.5.4.3 Pheromone-Based treated with cypermethrin than that in the
Management Tactics untreated plot. The number of mealybugs found
Sex pheromones of insects, including mealybugs, on Fuyu, a non-astringent cultivar, was higher
are natural compounds emitted by virgin females than that on Hiratanenashi, an astringent culti-
in order to attract conspecic males for mating. It var (Morishita 2005). This is usually because the
has long been known that sexually mature female insecticides have little effect on the mealybug,
Planococcus citri emit a sex pheromone to attract but eliminate the natural enemies, which were at
the winged adult males. These pheromones can one time holding the mealybug population in
be synthesized and used in the eld. Several check. At times, certain insecticides control the
chemicals have been identied to attract the mealybugs; however, with the decrease of com-
mealybugs like P. citri, Maconellicoccus hirsu- petition, other pests, particularly mites, increase.
tus, etc. The sex pheromones are effective in This second pest may become a more serious pest
extremely small quantities; they are non-toxic than the rst. Finally, it has often been noted that,
and can be applied in various ways. Unlike pesti- although a chemical may give excellent control
cides, these chemicals are species specic and do for a short time, the mealybug population, when
not affect benecial insects. The behavioral building up again, will reach an even higher level
218 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

than it had attained before the chemicals were mealybugs and conrmed to be pathogenic; they
rst applied. The frequent use of insecticides and include Aspergillus parasiticus Speare,
labor for mealybug control has made their cost to Cladosporium oxysporum (Berk and Curt.),
the grower still greater. Hirsutella sphaerospora H.C. Evans and Samson,
Mealybugs have many natural enemies, and Neozygites fumosa (Speare) Remaudire and
including parasitic wasps, arthropod predators, Keller (Browning 1994; Delalibera et al. 1997;
and entomopathogenic fungi. However, parasit- Le Ru 1986; Moore 1988; Samways and Grech
oid encyrtids and predatory ladybird beetles 1986).
(Coccinellidae) are the most common natural
enemies of mealybugs, and a tremendous amount
of research has been done in this area, much of it 16.6.1 Classical Biological Control
quite successfully.
Mealybug-parasitizing encyrtids are primary Biological control of mealybugs has been prac-
endoparasitoids, most of them undergo solitary ticed for many years; it involves three main tac-
development. Coccidoxenoides, Gyranusoidea, tics, that is, classical biological control,
Leptomastidea, Leptomastix, Pseudaphycus, and augmentative releases, and conservation biologi-
Tetracnemoidea are examples of encyrtid genera cal control. Species are considered invasive if
of mealybug parasitoids (Charles 1993; Franco they are transported outside their native range
et al. 2000; Noyes and Hayat 1994; Rosen 1981). and become established, spread, and adversely
A number of predators contribute to mealybug affect the environment. Since the mealybugs are
control. Few specialize on mealybugs, whereas the most invasive species, classical biological
most are generalists that prey on any small, soft- control has been frequently employed against
bodied arthropods. Sometimes, the naturally them. Moore (1988) reviewed the natural ene-
occurring parasitoids, including encyrtids and mies used against mealybugs in biological con-
aphelinids, and predators, such as coccinellids, trol programs worldwide. According to Moore,
lacewings, cecidomyiids, and drosophilids, play more than 70 species of parasitoids have been
a major role in the suppression of the mealybugs. introduced against mealybugs, and at least 16 %
Invasive mealybugs are often being controlled of the introduced parasitoids were considered to
excellently with the introduced parasitoids and initiate substantial or complete control. Most of
predators. Coccinellids accept a wide range of the introduced parasitoid species were encyrtids,
food, but they complete the larval development but species of Aphelinidae and Platygastridae
and produce viable progeny only if they consume proved to be successful on several occasions.
their essential food. Four genera of Chilocorinae Often a single parasitoid was considered to be
(Brumus, Aspidimerus, Stictobura, and Orcus) responsible for the success, even when more than
and six genera of Scymninae (Diomus, Nephus, one was introduced. Noyes and Hayat (1994)
Sidis, Parasidis, Cryptolaemus, and reviewed the use of encyrtids for biological con-
Pseudoscymnus) prey preferentially on mealy- trol of pest mealybugs and found that out of a
bugs (Iperti 1999). Other important groups of total of 385 importations of encyrtids, targeting
predators are brown lacewings (Neuroptera; 22 mealybug species, about 24 and 7 % were
Hemerobiidae) and predatory gall midges considered to give partial or successful control in
(Diptera; Cecidomyiidae). The most well-known the eld and in greenhouses, respectively. With
predator is the mealybug destroyer, Cryptolaemus regard to predators, Moore (1988) analyzed the
montrouzieri Mulsant, which is native to use of C. montrouzieri separately from that of
Australia. other mealybug predators. This ladybeetle has
As sap feeders, mealybugs are not likely to be been used many times against at least ten differ-
exposed to viral or bacterial infections (Moore ent species of mealybugs and was considered to
1988) and only a few species of entomopatho- give substantial or partial control in about 19 %
genic fungi were reported to be associated with of the introduced predators; on some occasions, it
16 Methods of Control 219

has been regarded as an outstanding biological (Bokonon-Ganta et al. 2002), the pink hibiscus
control success. Of the other 46 predator species, mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) in
mostly coccinellids, as well as cecidomyiids, the Caribbean and California (Roltsch et al.
chrysopids, hemerobiids, and lycaenids used in 2006), and the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus
biological control of mealybugs, only the cecido- marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink in
myiid, Kalodiplosis pseudococci Felt, was Palau (Muniappan et al. 2006). It is important to
regarded as having given signicant control, note that successes were mostly achieved in trop-
when used against Dysmicoccus brevipes ical regions where the target area for classical
(Cockerell) in Hawaii in conjunction with two biological control and the area of origin of the
parasitoids. Stiling (1993) showed that the major introduced parasitoids displayed similar climatic
reason for the failure of introduced natural ene- conditions. In a few cases, modeling has been
mies to reduce the pest population is related to used as a tool to analyze actual systems and to
climate (34.5 %). Moore (1988) analyzed the rea- identify major constraints, in order to improve
sons for the failure of both parasitoids and preda- the biological control of mealybugs. For exam-
tors of mealybugs to become established in ple, the model developed by Gutierrez et al.
biological control programs. In the case of para- (2008a) predicted that the parasitoid A. pseudo-
sitoids, Moore cites the following documented cocci would have a larger impact on the vine
reasons: (1) incorrect identication of the target mealybug P. cus than either L. abnormis or C.
mealybug species; (2) the target was a native spe- montrouzieri, and that biological control of the
cies; (3) hyperparasitism; (4) failure of the para- mealybug in California would require additional
sitoid to adapt to unfavorable climates; and (5) species of natural enemies and/or could be
other reasons, such as interference with ants, use achieved by reducing the size of the spatial-
of pesticides, and small numbers of individuals temporal refuge. In another use of a modeling
released. With regard to predators, Moore (1988) approach, Gutierrez et al. (2008b) concluded that
listed six main reasons for failure: (1) no adapta- the biological control of the vine mealybug might
tion of the released species to climate; (2) effect be adversely affected by climate change.
of the pesticides; (3) density of the prey; (4) Gutierrez et al. (1993) developed a tritrophic
effect of the host plant; (5) inability to reach the model of the cassava system and used it to explore
prey; and (6) effects of the other organisms. The the basis for the successful control of the cassava
lack of adequate food resources for natural ene- mealybug P. manihoti in Africa by the exotic
mies within or near to agroecosystems may limit parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi (DeSantis), and
the performance of biological control agents also to examine the causes for the failure of the
against mealybugs. For example, Davies et al. related parasitoid E. diversicornis (Howard) to
(2004) observed that the survival and reproduc- establish itself.
tion of Coccidoxenoides perminutus Girault, a
parasitoid of the citrus mealybug Pl. citri, were
signicantly inuenced by the nature of the nec- 16.6.2 Augmentative Control Tactics
tar on which the parasitoid was fed. In light of
these results, it was suggested that the habitat The rst known case of an augmentative biologi-
management, for example, by providing suitable cal control program dates back to before 1917 and
nectar sources for adult parasitoids, might be a was aimed at controlling the citrophilus mealybug
means to conserve and enhance C. perminutus Ps. calceolariae, a pest of citrus in Southern
activity in the eld. In recent years, successful California, by using the coccinellid predator C.
classical biological control programs against montrouzieri (Luck and Forster 2003; van
mealybugs have targeted the cassava mealybug, Lenteren 2006). Since then, this Australian lady-
Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero in Africa bird beetle has been commonly used in various
(Neuenschwander 2001), the mango mealybug, countries on diverse crops (Copland et al. 1985;
Rastrococcus invadens (Williams) in West Africa Franco et al. 2009), and is actually one of the few
220 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

species of natural enemies commercially avail- of the migration of natural enemies from a long
able for the biological control of mealybugs by distance. Therefore, information about the natural
means of augmentative tactics. Augmentative enemy density, late in the season, may be achieved
releases of L. dactylopii and C. montrouzieri by setting up traps baited with mealybug colonies,
against Pl. citri have been reported to be effective with or without the sex pheromone (with respect
in several Mediterranean countries and in other to each individual case).
citrus-growing areas, such as Australia and Application of chemicals alone does not solve
California. However, Mendel et al. (1999) released the mealybug problem in many cases. Many a
5,00010,000 individuals of L. dactylopii or time, more than one control method is needed to
10,00050,000 individuals of A. pseudococci per manage the mealybugs.
hectare and obtained no signicant impact both
on the mealybug infestation and on the fruit dam-
age. When the mealybug population is low, the
References
population densities of its specic natural ene-
mies, especially the predators, are also low. Abrahao JT, Mamprim O (1958) Conchonilha da rail do
Parasitoids, which are better tted to survive at cafeeiro. Biologico 24(12):268271
low mealybug densities, may nd it difcult to Addison P (2002) Chemical stem barriers for the control
of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in vineyards. S
reach their hosts in their most appropriate refuges,
Afr J Enolo Vitic 23:18
and these small colonies may also be well pro- Ahmadi M, Amir-Beshalli B, Hossssieni SZ (2012)
tected by ants. Furthermore, the parasitoids of Evaluating the effect of some botanical insecticides on
tropical or subtropical mealybug species do not the citrus mealybug Planococcus citri (Risso)
(Hemiptera; Pseudococcidae). Afr J Biotechnol
tolerate Mediterranean climate winters very well.
11:1162011624
However, inoculative or inundating releases of Anand P, Ayub K (2000) The effect of ve insecticides on
parasitoids may compensate for their low sur- Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) (Homoptera:
vival. Augmentation of the parasitoid population Pseudococcidae) and its natural enemies Anagyrus
kamali Moursi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), and
in spring, when mealybugs leave their typical ref-
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant and Scymnus
uges for new colonization sites on the host plant, coccivora Aiyar (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Int Pest
may improve the mealybug/parasitoid ratio Cont 42:170173
(Mendel et al. 1999). Since the population density Babu TR, Ramanamurthy G (1998) Residual toxicity of
pesticides to the adults of Scymnus coccivora Ayyar
during this season is low, the released parasitoids
(Coccinellidae: Coleoptera) a predator on mealybugs
tend to disperse over a rather large area in their on grape. Indian J Plant Prot 26:9698
search for mealybug colonies (Mendel et al. Berlinger MJ, Golberg AM (1978) Effect of the fruit
1999). The kairomonal response of the parasitoids sepals on the citrus mealybug population and on its
parasite. Entomol Exp Appl 24:238243
to the mealybug sex pheromone can be utilized to
Bivins JL, Deal AS (1973) Systemic insecticides for con-
keep the released individuals in the targeted area. trol of Citrus mealybug in gardenias. Calif Agric
The parasitoids search for mealybugs in the vicin- 27(8):56
ity of the pheromone-release points (Franco et al. Bokonon-Ganta AH, de Groote H, Neuenschwander P
(2002) Socio-economic impact of biological control of
2008); therefore, we may increase the intensity of
mango mealybug in Benin. Agric Ecosyst Environ
parasitization in the treated plots. Another tactic 93:367378
that may be considered involves measurement of Browning HW (1994) Early classical biological control
the population of natural enemies in the managed on citrus. In: Rosen D, Bennett FD, Capinera JL (eds)
Pest management in the subtropics: biological con-
area. Advance acquisition of information should
trol a Florida perspective. Intercept, Andover
be considered in order to plan augmentation of Carter W, Gortner WA (1958) The translocation of radio-
natural enemies in the coming growing season. It active (S35) Bayer 19639 in pineapple plants. J Econ
is expected that if there was considerable mealy- Entomol 51(6):905907
Charles JG (1993) A survey of mealybugs and their natu-
bug mortality in a particular plot, it could be
ral enemies in horticultural crops in North Island, New
because of the activity of parasitoids and preda- Zealand, with implications for biological control.
tors that had survived in this plot and not because Biocontrol Sci Technol 3:405418
16 Methods of Control 221

Cloyd RA, Dickinson A (2006) Effect of insecticides on viburni (Signoret), (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae).
mealybug destroyer (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Rev Frutic 22:1726
parasitoid Leptomastix dactylopii (Hymenoptera: Gould WF, McGuire RG (2000) Hot water treatment and
Encyrtidae), natural enemies of citrus mealybug insecticidal coatings for disinfesting limes of mealy-
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). J Econ Entomol bugs. Stored Prod Quart Entomol 93:10171020
99:15961604 Gross S, Gefen D, Rotman N, Tadmor U, Zemer B, Gotlib
Copland MJW, Tingle CCD, Saynor M, Panism A (1985) A, Gefen Y (2000) Chemical control of the spherical
Biology of glasshouse mealybugs and their predators mealybug (Nipaecoccus viridis) (Newstead) in citrus.
and parasitoids. In: Hussey NW, Scopes N (eds) Alon Hanotea 54:234240 (in Hebrew)
Biological pest control: the glasshouse experience. Gross S, Biraty Y, Gal S (2001) Using powdery and
Blandford, Poole microcapsular preparates to decimate ant popula-
Cox JM, Pearce MJ (1983) Wax produced by dermal tions on citrus trees. Alon Hanotea 55:219221 (in
pores in three species of mealybug (Homoptera, Hebrew)
Pseudococcidae). Int J Inst Morph Embryol Grout TG, Stephen P (2005) Use of an inexpensive tech-
12:235248 nique to compare systemic insecticides applied
Cranshaw W, Jevremovic Z, Sclar DC, Mannix L (2000) through drip irrigation systems in citrus. Afr Entomol
Observations on the biology and control of the haw- 13:353358
thorn (two-circuli) mealybug, Phenacoccus dearnessi Gullan PJ, Kosztarab M (1997) Adaptations in scale
(King). J Arboric 26:225229 insects. Annu Rev Entomol 42:2350
Daane KM, Bentley WJ, Walton VM, Malakar-Kuenen R, Gutierrez AP, Neuenschwander P, Vanalphen JJM (1993)
Millar JG, Ingels CA, Weber EA, Gispert C (2006) Factors affecting biological control of cassava mealy-
New controls investigated for vine mealybug. Calif bug by exotic parasitoids a ratio-dependent supply
Agric 60:3138 demand driven model. J Appl Ecol 30:706721
Davies AP, Ceballo FA, Walter GH (2004) Is the potential Gutierrez AP, Daane KM, Ponti L, Walton VM, Ellis CK
of Coccidoxenoides perminutus, a mealybug parasit- (2008a) Prospective evaluation of the biological con-
oid, limited by climatic or nutritional factors? Biol trol of vine mealybug: refuge effects and climate.
Control 31:181188 J Appl Ecol 45:524536
Delalibera I, Humber RA, Bento JMS, DeMatos AP Gutierrez AP, Ponti L, dOultremont T, Ellis CK (2008b)
(1997) First record of the entomopathogenic fungus Climate change effects on oikilotherm tritrophic inter-
Neozygites fumosa on the cassava mealybug actions. Clim Change 87:167192
Phenacoccus herreni. J Invert Pathol 69:276278 Harris E (1961) Distortion of guineacorn (Sorghum vul-
Dietz SM, Harwood RF (1960) Host range and damage by gare) caused by a mealybug Heterococcus nigeriensis
the grass mealybug Heterococcus graminicola. J Econ Williams, in northern Nigeria. Bull Entomol Res
Entomol 53(5):737740 51(4):667684
Flaherty DL, Peacock WL, Bettiga L, Leavitt GM (1982) Iperti G (1999) Biodiversity of predaceous coccinellidae
Chemicals losing effect against grape mealybug. Calif in relation to bioindication and economic importance.
Agric 36:1516 Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:323342
Foldi I (1983) Structure and functions of the integumen- Irulandi S, Kumar PKV, Seetharama HG, Sreedharan K
tary glands of mealybugs Pseudococcidae and of their (2001) Bioefcacy of neem formulations alone and in
secretions. Ann Soc Entomol Fr 19:155166 combination with synthetic insecticide against mealy-
Franco JC, Silva EB, Carvalho JP (2000) Mealybugs bug, Planococcus citri (Risso) on Coffea. J Coffee Res
(Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae) associated with citrus in 29:5660
Portugal. ISA Press, Lisbon (in Portuguese) James DG (2004) Effect of buprofezin on survival of
Franco JC, Silva EB, Cortegano E, Campos L, Branco M, immature stages of Harmonia axyridis, Stethorus
Zada A, Mendel Z (2008) Kairomonal response of the punctum picipes (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Orius
parasitoid Anagyrus spec. nov near pseudococci to the tristicolor (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), and Geocoris
sex pheromone of the vine mealybug. Entomol Exp spp. (Hemiptera: Geocoridae). J Econ Entomol
Appl 126:122130 97:900904
Franco JC, Zada A, Mendel Z (2009) Novel approaches Jefferson RN, Pritchard AE (1961) Pest control guide for
for the management of mealybug pests. In: Ishaaya I, California greenhouse plants and owers. Calif Agr
Rami Horowitz A (eds) Biorational control of arthro- Expt Stn Ext Ser Leaf 134
pod pests. Springer, Dordrecht/New York, Kosztarab M, Kozr F (1988) Scale insects of Central
pp 233278 Europe. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht
Fu Castillo AA, Miranda Blanco JL, Osorio Acosta G, Larrain PS (1999) Effect of chemigation and painted
Martinez Carrillo JL (2004) Chemical control of applications of imidacloprid (CondorReg.) upon
mealybug Planococcus cus Signoret (Homoptera: Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) (Homoptera:
Pseudococcidae) in table grapes. Agric Techn Mex Pseudococcidae) populations in table grapes. Agric
30:101105 Techn Santiago 59:1325 (in Spanish)
Gonzalez RH, Jorge Poblete G, Gerardo-Barria P (2001) Le Ru B (1986) Epizootiology of the entomophthoraceous
The tree fruit mealybug in Chile, Pseudococcus fungus Neozygites fumosa in a population of the cas-
222 M. Mani and C. Shivaraju

sava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti (Hom, Noyes JS, Hayat M (1994) Oriental mealybug parasitoids
Pseudococcidae). Entomophaga 31:7989 of the Anagyrini (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). CABI,
Luck RF, Forster LD (2003) Quality of augmentative bio- Wallingford
logical control agents: a historical perspective and les- Prasad K, Divakar BN, Hegde NK, Ganigara BS (1998)
sons learned from evaluating Trichogramma. In: van Nature of damage and efcacy of insecticides against
Lenteren JC (ed) Quality control and production of mealybug, Ferrisia virgata (Ckll.) on black pepper
biological control agents: theory and testing proce- cuttings. Pest Manag Hortic Ecosyst 4:5253
dures. CABI, Wallingford Roltsch WJ, Meyerdirk DE, Warkentin R, Andress ER,
Madsen HF, Westgard PH (1962) Behavior and control of Carrera K (2006) Classical biological control of the
the grape mealybug on pears. J Econ Entomol pink hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus
55(6):849850 (Green), in southern California. Biol Control
Mani M, Thontadarya TS (1991) Effect of soil application 37:155166
of systemic granular insecticides on the population of Rosen D (1981) A new species of Pseudaphycus (Hym,
grape mealybug and its natural enemies. Pestology Encyrtidae), with notes on the Angelicus group.
XV(7):2430 Entomophaga 26:251263
Martin NA, Workman PJ (1999) Efcacy of insecticides Rotundo G (1978) Mass isolation of virgin females of
for longtailed mealybug control. In: Proceedings of Pseudococcus calceolariae (Mask.) (Homoptera,
the fty second New Zealand Plant Protection Coccoidea) by the use of a juvenile hormone [Italian].
Conference, Auckland Airport Centre, Auckland, New Boll Lab Entomol Agrar Filippo Silvestri Portici
Zealand, 1012 Aug 1999. Wine Industry Association, 35:162168
Western Australia Samways MJ, Grech NM (1986) Assessment of the fun-
Mendel Z, Gross S, Steinberg S, Cohen M, Blumberg D gus Cladosporium oxysporum (Berk and Curt) as a
(1999) Trials for the control of the citrus mealybug in potential biocontrol agent against certain homoptera.
citrus orchards by augmentative release of two encyr- Agric Ecosyst Environ 15:231239
tid parasitoids. Entomol Bari 33:251265 Sazo L, Pizarro E, Araya JE (2006) Effect of the form of
Meyerdirk DE, French JV, Hart WG (1982) Effect of pes- application of imidacloprid on control of the long-
ticide residues on the natural enemies of citrus mealy- tailed mealybug Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni
bug. Environ Entomol 11:134136 & Tozzetti) on avocado and its impact on Neoseiulus
Michelbacher AE, Swift JE, Davis CS, Hall DH, Raabe californicus (McGregor) in Chile. Bol San Veg Plagas
RD (1959) Ridding the garden of common pests. Calif 32:483490
Agric Expt Sta Ext Servo Circ 479:3031 Shafqat S, Munir A, Mushtaq A, Kwon YJ (2007)
Moore D (1988) Agents used for biological control of Insecticidal control of the mealybug Phenacoccus
mealybugs (Pseudococcidae). Biocontrol News Inf gossypiphilous (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), a new
9:209225 pest of cotton in Pakistan. Entomol Res 37:7680
Morishita M (2005) Effect of bark-scraping, dormant Snetsinger R (1966) Biology and control of a root-
spray of petroleum oil and applying pesticide in late infesting mealybug on Saintpaulia. J Econ Entomol
spring on density of Japanese mealybug, Planococcus 59(5):10771078
kraunhiae (Kuwana), in persimmon. Annu Rep Kansai Stiling P (1993) Why do natural enemies fail in classical
Plant Prot Soc 47:123124 biological control programs. Am Entomol 39:3137
Muniappan R, Meyerdirk DE, Sengebau FM, Berringer Tang SJ, Qin HZ, Wang JM, Gu P (1992) Studies on the
DD, Reddy GVP (2006) Classical biological control mealy-bug Planococus citri (Risso). [Chinese].
of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus J Shanghai Agric Coll 10(1):4452
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the Republic of van Lenteren JC (2006) How not to evaluate augmentative
Palau. Fla Entomol 89:212217 biological control. Biol Control 39:115118
Muthukrishnan N, Manoharan T, Thevan PST, Anbu S Wabale AS, Jadhav VG, Vane AD, Nale BV (2010)
(2005) Evaluation of buprofezin for the management Efcacy of Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Delli leaf
of grape mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus extracts against mealybug Ferrisia virgata (Ckll.).
(Green). J Entomol Res 29:339344 Asian J Exp Biol Sci Spl :112114
Neuenschwander P (2001) Biological control of the cas- Walton VM, Daane KM, Pringle KL (2004) Monitoring
sava mealybug in Africa: a review. Biol Control Planococcus cus in South African vineyards with sex
21:214229 pheromone-baited traps. Crop Prot 23:10891096
Insecticide Resistance and Its
Management in Mealybugs 17
T. Venkatesan, S.K. Jalali, S.L. Ramya,
and M. Prathibha

Mealybugs throughout the world cause a variety used only once and hence pesticide applications
of economic problems and are called hard to kill are required to be repeated many times. This situ-
pests of fruit trees. Insecticides also play a criti- ation may lead to the development of insecticide
cal role in the management of mealybugs. resistance. As a result, many insecticides had
Currently, a fairly broad selection of insecticides failed to check the mealybugs. Further, different
namely organophosphates, carbamates, neonic- classes of insecticides provide various active
otinoids, insect growth regulators and keto-enols ingredients and their efcacy may be reduced if
are being used against mealybugs. However, insecticide resistance develops.
many insecticides are ineffective due to the cryp- Many insecticides do not provide adequate
tic behaviour of mealybug, its typical waxy body control of mealybugs because of the inherent
cover and clumped spatial distribution pattern. nature of mealybugs. Mealybugs are noted for the
Waxy coatings protecting the eggs, nymphs and production of dermal wax secretions. Adult
adults of mealybug make it almost impossible for mealybugs and the nymphal instars are covered
insecticides to reach them, and also there is a pos- with a waxy coating. In addition, the eggs of
sibility of development of insecticide resistance. mealybugs, protected by the waxy lamentous
Furthermore, available pesticides in the market secretions of the ovisac, are almost impossible to
may not be adequate to manage the mealybugs if reach with insecticides.

T. Venkatesan (*) S.K. Jalali S.L. Ramya


M. Prathibha
National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources,
Bangalore 560024, India
e-mail: tvenket12@gmail.com

Springer India 2016 223


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_17
224 T. Venkatesan et al.

Eggs protected with waxy ovisac Adult mealybug covered with Mealybug crawlers not
waxy coating covered with waxy coating

The waxy secretion is the most common con- cals are used to control the mealybugs. However,
spicuous trait of the mealybug family. It is a crawler stage is not covered with wax, and hence,
complex system that serves different functions. this is perhaps one of the most susceptible stages
It is produced by the epidermal wax glands and of mealybug to chemicals. However, the crawler
transported to the body surface via ducts, pores stage is available only for a few days. Control
and secretory setae of various types (Foldi 1983; failure does not always imply resistance, and it is
Gullan and Kosztarab 1997). The main compo- wrong to conclude that the mealybugs have
nents of the wax of ve mealybug species developed resistance to insecticides. Mealybugs
(Planococcus citri (Risso), Pl. cus (Signoret), most frequently cause concern by their presence
Pl. vovae, Pseudococcus cryptus (Hempel) and on horticultural crops destined for export mar-
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) were trialkyl kets. However, relatively few insecticides can be
glycerols and wax esters. The wax cover is used on fresh fruits without exceeding residue
believed to prevent water loss. The hydrophobic tolerances set by those markets. This restricted
property of the wax enables the mealybugs to range of permitted insecticides increases the risk
escape drowning or becoming swamped by of resistance and the potential economic impact
water in their typical cryptic sites. They are cov- that it could bring about. Flaherty et al.. (1982)
ered with a powdery wax that repels water-based reported that insufcient control measures and
insecticide solutions. The ovisac, which is also a multivoltine nature of mealybugs may speed up
wax secretion, is considered to be an adaptation the development of insecticide resistance. If an
that protects the offspring from both wet and dry insecticide has provided good control sometime
conditions, and it may also provide an attach- back but fails to effect adequate control of the
ment to the host plant. Tubular ducts and multi- mealybugs over the use of the chemical for a
locular disc pores, respectively, produce long number of years, then it is concluded that the
hollow and shorter curled laments, which make mealybug has developed resistance to that par-
up the ovisac and the male cocoon (Cox and ticular insecticide. Many a time it is not so in the
Pearce 1983; Foldi 1983). The white wax of case of mealybugs. Mealybugs are capable of
mealybugs is strongly light reective and may becoming resistant to insecticides, and it should
reduce desiccation. In some cases, the wax also not be assumed resistant until tenfold of resis-
serves to cover the honeydew droplets and to tance is observed (Valles et al. 1997; Khan et al.
protect the mealybugs from contamination by 2013). However, documentation of insecticide
their own honeydew and defensive exudates resistance in mealybugs across the globe is very
(Gullan and Kosztarab 1997). Normally, chemi- scanty.
17 Insecticide Resistance and Its Management in Mealybugs 225

17.1 Monitoring of Insecticide et al. 2005; Khan et al. 2013). Further, knowledge
Resistance of the target pest populations with respect to their
susceptibility levels to different insecticides and
While insecticides have greatly improved human how much they vary among locations can be
health and agricultural production worldwide, taken as a clue to the genetic potential for resis-
the use of insecticides has been limited by the tance development. Hence, there is a need to
evolution of resistance in many major pests, document the geographical variation of natural
including few that became pests as a result of the populations of mealybug susceptibility to insecti-
application of insecticides (Mallet 1989). cides. Further, determining a diagnostic dose for
An important component of resistance man- each test insecticide from the generated baseline
agement strategies is the ability to effectively data is needed for facilitating future resistance
monitor susceptibility levels in pest populations monitoring of mealybug (Sanderson and Roush
to insecticides. Determining dosage response of a 1992; Denholm et al. 1996).
target pest populations or species to particular
insecticides would be very useful for monitoring
insecticide resistance in mealybugs. In general, 17.2 Dosage Mortality Test
various metabolic resistance mechanisms work in Mealybugs
by detoxifying insecticides through oxidative or
hydrolytic reactions to reduce or eliminate the For establishing baseline data to different insecti-
toxic activity of insecticide. This is a dynamic cides, different stages of mealybugs were treated
process in insect populations where resistance as per the mode of action of each insecticide.
levels rise and fall according to exposure regimes Mixed stages including immature and adults of
and selection pressures (Castle et al. 1996; the mealybugs were tested for susceptibility to
Horowitz et al. 2002), which ultimately increases chlorpyrifos, dimethoate, methomyl, and imida-
the resistant individuals in the eld. Georghiou cloprid. Only immature stages were tested with
and Taylor (1986) suggested that a number of buprofezin because of its activity as a chitin syn-
factors inuence resistance development in pest thesis inhibitor that interferes with the develop-
populations including biological, ecological, ment of immature stages of susceptible insects
genetic and operational. Regular exposure to pes- (Nilima et al. 2012). There are different bioassay
ticides allows selection of individuals that are techniques which are followed for determining
naturally resistant to pesticide and develop resis- the baseline toxicity of different insecticides.
tance to survive. When a pesticide is used for the
rst time, a small proportion of the pest popula-
tion may survive exposure to the material due to 17.3 Petri Dish Bioassay
their distinct genetic makeup. These individuals
pass the genes that are responsible for resistance Susceptibility to contact insecticides (e.g. bupro-
to the next generation. Subsequent uses of the fezin, chlorpyrifos, dimethoate and methomyl)
pesticide increase the proportion of less suscep- that are applied on foliar was assessed using an
tible individuals in the population. Through this established petri dish technique (Prabhaker et al.
process of selection, the population gradually 2006a, b; Nilima et al. 2012). Morishita (2006)
develops resistance to the pesticide. also followed plastic petri dish technique in
Lack of systemic management plans may also which rst-instar nymphs of Planococcus
account for the development of resistance kraunhiae (Kuwana) were transferred onto a kid-
(Bushra et al. 2014). Different agro-ecological ney bean leaf on 1.5 % agar gel in a plastic petri
factors such as the presence of refugia, which dish. A petri dish which contained 2040 nymphs
harbour less resistant or susceptible individuals, was sprayed once with 6 ml of insecticide through
could dilute resistant gene frequencies (Sayyed a spraying tower on day 2 (rst instar), day 9
226 T. Venkatesan et al.

(second instar), day 16 (third instar) or day 25 ple, rates as low as 48 g/ha (active ingredient,
(adult), and examined for susceptibility to a.i.) of ethyl parathion provided grape mealybug
insecticide. control (Frick 1952). Eventually, these materials
became less effective. Ps. maritimus developed
resistance to parathion in the San Joaquin Valley,
17.4 Systemic Bioassay Technique California, USA (Flaherty et al. 1982). A similar
parathion resistance in the mealybugs had been
To determine baseline toxicity data of imidaclo- reported in South Africa (Myburgh and Siebert
prid, a systemic uptake technique was used as 1964). It has been reported that there could be a
described by Prabhaker et al. (2006a) and Nilima potential for resistance to buprofezin and hence it
et al. (2012). Discriminating doses are expected is recommended for twice in a year around the
to kill 100 % of a susceptible population but 0.1 world.
% of resistant individuals (French-Constant and
Roush 1990).
17.5.3 Planococcus citri (Risso)

17.5 Insecticide Resistance A strain of Planococcus citri from citrus groves


in Different Mealybugs near Limassol, Cyprus, with a long history of
spray treatments, developed a low level of resis-
17.5.1 Pseudococcus viburni tance to several organophosphorus insecticides;
this ranged from 1.6-fold to malathion and 2.8-
In New Zealand, mealybugs were found to fold to diazinon (Serghiou 1983). Further, the
develop resistance due to extensive and regular mealybug was reported to develop resistance to
use of insecticides. The obscure mealybug chlorpyrifos, prothiofos and kinoprene from
Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) (=Pseudococcus 1991 to 1992 (Walker et al. 1993). The develop-
afniss (Maskell) was reportedly resistant to ment of resistance to chlorpyrifos by citrus
dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) in mealybug, Pl. citri, was reported in Israel
Hawkes Bay in 1959 (Congdon and Morison (Mendel et al. 1999).
1959). Following anecdotal records of resistance
to parathion-methyl in the 1970s, resistance to
chlorpyrifos was reported in the 1990s, with 17.5.4 Planococcus kraunhiae
signs of cross-resistance to prothiofos (Charles and Pseudococcus cryptus
et al. 1993). A residual bioassay was used to
measure the responses to chlorpyrifos of two Methyl bromide fumigation was conducted for
populations of Ps. afnis from pome fruit in quarantine control of Planococcus kraunhiae
Hawkes Bay. One population of Ps. afnis (Kuw.) and Pseudococcus cryptus (Hempel)
exhibited a 24-fold level of resistance compared (Pseudococcus citriculus Green) on mandarins to
with the other population (Charles et al. 1993). develop a disinfestation treatment for export
from Japan to the USA. Susceptibility of all
stages of the pests to methyl bromide fumigation
17.5.2 Pseudococcus maritimus showed that all stages of P. kraunhiae were more
(Ehrh.) resistant than those of P. citriculus, and that the
most resistant stage was 5-day-old eggs of Pl.
The organophosphates including parathion were kraunhiae. LD50s and LD95s for 5-day-old eggs
extensively used for the control of the mealybugs were 26.4/m3 and 31.8 g/m3, respectively. A
from the 1940s to the 1990s (Frick 1952; fumigation standard (48 g/m3 of methyl bromide
Tranfaglia and Viggiani 1981; Grimes and Cone for 2 h at 15 C or above with 32 % or below
1985). These materials were effective; for exam- loading) was established on the basis of the data
17 Insecticide Resistance and Its Management in Mealybugs 227

from susceptibility tests (Misumi et al. 1994). against mealybugs in Tunisian vineyards. Mixed
Planococcus kraunhiae were collected from life stages of Pl. cus were tested for susceptibil-
places with conventional insecticide spraying and ity to all insecticides except for buprofezin,
an insecticide-free orchard. LC50 of the rst- which was measured against early and late instars
instar Hashimoto population and the resistance (rst, second and third). Variations in susceptibil-
ratio at LC50 of the other populations collected ity to each insecticide among sample sites showed
from conventional spraying orchards to that of a 7-fold difference for buprofezin, 11-fold to
the insecticide-free orchard were, respectively, chlorpyrifos, 9-fold to dimethoate, 24-fold to
0.637 ppm and 8.012.2 for cypermethrin, 1.15 methomyl and 8.5-fold to imidacloprid (Nilima
ppm and 6.07.8 for methidathion and 0.029 ppm et al. 2012).
and 15.420.2 for acetamiprid. The susceptibility
to prothiofos and methidathion decreased as the
growth stage advanced, whereas susceptibility to 17.5.7 Planococcus minor
acetamiprid remained high (Morishita 2006).
Thirumurugan and Gautam (2001) determined
the LC50 values for different insecticides and the
17.5.5 Maconellicoccus hirsutus relative resistance of Planococcus minor
(Maskell) (Pl. pacicus Cox) to various insecti-
The adult pink mealybug, Maconellicoccus hir- cides in relation to predatory beetle, Scymnus
sutus (Green), showed resistance to lambda- brunnescens (Motsch). The predators were more
cyhalothrin, pirimiphos-methyl, triazophos, resistant to endosulfan (0.07 %) than mealybugs.
pronil and decamethrin when tested under
laboratory and semi-eld conditions (Anand
and Ayub 2000). Eggs, crawlers, early nymphs, 17.5.8 Phenococcus solenopsis
late nymphs and adults of the pink hibiscus
mealybug, M. hirsutus, were tested for their In Pakistan, Bushra et al. (2014) reported insecti-
susceptibility to methyl bromide in 2-h labora- cide resistance in P. solenopsis (Tinsley) for
tory fumigations at ambient conditions (25 C, selected organophosphates and pyrethroids. The
95 % RH). Based on probit analysis of dose resistance ratio were in the range of 2.713.3-
response data, no signicant differences were fold for chlorpyrifos, 11.630.2-fold for profeno-
observed among susceptibilities of the crawler, fos, 10.646.4-fold for bifenthrin, 5.825.2-fold
early-stage or late-stage nymphs or adults at for deltamethrin and 4.125.0-fold for
either the LC50 or LC99 level, but late-stage lambda-cyhalothrin.
nymphs were more tolerant than early-stage
nymphs in a separate paired comparison test
(Zettler et al. 2002). 17.6 Resistance Management
and Prevention Strategy

17.5.6 Planococcus cus Management strategies aimed at reducing or pre-


and Planococcus citri venting resistance will help conserve existing
products for ongoing use (Charles 1996, 2004).
Planococcus cus (Sign.) has the innate ability to The general strategy is to reduce the selection
develop resistance (Castle et al. 1996; Horowitz pressure for resistance by optimum spray timing,
et al. 2002). Mansour et al. (2010) reported that accurate delivery of insecticides and rotation of
methidathion was more effective against the products with active ingredients from different
mealybugs Pl. cus and Pl. citri and cautioned chemical groups and used in a planned pro-
that the mealybug is likely to develop resistance gramme. This is combined with management
to methidathion, which was most widely used practices for the crop and shelter trees that aim to
228 T. Venkatesan et al.

reduce mealybug numbers and improve insecti- detoxifying enzymes and molecular mechanism
cide coverage. Details are provided below: of resistance by detecting different insecticide
resistance alleles, namely sodium-gated channel,
Mark spot infestations of mealybugs during KDR (Knock down resistance) and Ache.
harvest. Conne sprays to the infested crop
area: do not spray shelter or other areas around
the orchard unless there is a clearly identied References
source of pest infestation.
Be aware of mealybug natural enemies and Anand P, Ayub K (2000) The effect of ve insecticides on
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) (Homoptera:
take actions to protect them.
Pseudococcidae) and its natural enemies Anagyrus
Insecticide use must be designed to keep the kamali moursi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), and
mealybug population small enough to prevent Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant and Scymus coc-
signicant infestation of fruit. Spray only civora Aiyar (Coccinellidae). Int Pest Control
42(5):170173
when essential for control.
Bushra S, Sarfraz Ali S, Haz AA (2014) Resistance in
Follow industry codes of conduct where mealybug Phenococcus solenopsis Tinsley
appropriate. Comply with label rates. (Homoptera: Psedococcidae) in Pakistan to selected
Use correct application procedures, observing organophosphates and pyrethroids insecticides. Crop
Prot 66:2933
correct tractor speeds and spraying conditions
Castle SJ, Henneberry TJ, Prabhaker N, Toscano NC
to obtain good insecticide coverage. Calibrate (1996) Trends in relative susceptibilities of white ies
sprayers at least once per season. Follow spray to insecticides through the cotton season in the
programme recommendations. Imperial Valley, CA. Proc Beltwide Cotton Conf
2:10321035
Mealybugs are difcult to kill with insecti-
Charles JG (1996) Mealybug resistance management
cides. They also often live deep inside cracks strategy. In: Bourdot GW, Suckling DM (eds) Pesticide
and crevices in trees, or inside fruit or fruit resistance: prevention & management. New Zealand
bunches where they are protected from con- Plant Protection Society, Lincoln, pp 172176
Charles JG (2004) Mealybug insecticide resistance man-
tact with insecticides. High-volume applica-
agement strategy. http://resistance.nzpps.org/index.
tions of insecticides are essential for mealybug php?p=insecticides/mealybug
control and should be sprayed to run-off. Charles JG, Walker JTS, White V (1993) Resistance to
Mealybug control should not be attempted chlorpyrifos in the mealybugs Pseudococcus afnis
and P. longispinus in Hawkes Bay and Waikato pip-
with a low-volume application technology.
fruit orchards. In: Proceedings of the forty sixth New
Identify mealybugs present and learn their life Zealand Plant Protection Conference, Christchurch,
cycle. Apply insecticides when the most vul- New Zealand, 1012 Aug 1993, pp 120125
nerable stage (crawlers) is prevalent. To mini- Congdon NB, Morison L (1959) Mealybug resurgence in
Hawkes Bay orchards. N Z J Agric 99:481487
mise this risk, use strictly in accordance with
Cox JM, Pearce MJ (1983) Wax produced by dermal
label instructions. Avoid using this pesticide pores in three species of mealybug (Homoptera,
exclusively all season. The potential for resis- Pseudococcidae). Int J Inst Morph Embryol
tance to Applaud has been long recognised 12:235248
Denholm I, Cahill M, Byrne FJ, Devonshire AL (1996)
and it is generally recommended around the
Progress with documenting and combating insecticide
world that it is not used more than twice a resistance in Bemisia. In Gerling D, Mayer RT (eds)
year. Bemisia: 1995. Taxonomy, biology, damage, control
Use a range of insecticides, especially if mak- and management. Intercept Ltd., Andover, Hants,
Great Britain, pp 577603
ing more than one application per season.
Flaherty DL, Peacock WL, Bettiga L, Leavitt GM (1982)
Chemicals losing effect against grape mealybug. Calif
Efforts should be made to determine insecti- Agric 36:1516
cide resistance across the geographical popula- Foldi I (1983) Structure and functions of the integumen-
tary glands of mealybugs Pseudococcidae and of their
tions and different species of mealybugs. Further,
secretions. Ann Soc Entomol Fr 19:155166
adequate in-depth research should be done on French-Constant RH, Roush RT (1990) Resistance detec-
biochemical aspects especially quantication of tion and documentation: the relative roles of pesticidal
17 Insecticide Resistance and Its Management in Mealybugs 229

and biochemical assays. In: Roush RT, Tabashnik BE Nilima P, Carmen G, Steven JC (2012) Baseline suscepti-
(eds) Pesticide resistance in arthropods. Chapman & bility of Planococcus cus (Hemiptera:
Hall, New York, pp 438 Pseudococcidae) from California to select insecti-
Frick KE (1952) The value of some organic phosphate cides. J Econ Entomol 105(4):13921400. doi:http://
insecticides in control of grape mealybug. J Econ dx.doi.org/10.1603/EC11340
Entomol 45:340341 Prabhaker NS, Castle J, Byrne FJ, Henneberry TJ,
Georghiou GP, Taylor CE (1986) Factors inuencing the Toscano NC (2006a) Establishment of baseline
evolution of resistance. In: National Research Council susceptibility data to various insecticides for glassy-
(ed) Pesticide resistance: strategies and tactics for winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca coagulata Say
management. National Academy Press, Washington, (Homoptera: Cicadellidae), by comparative bioassay
DC, pp 157169 techniques. J Econ Entomol 99:141154
Grimes EW, Cone WW (1985) Control of the grape Prabhaker N, Castle SJ, Toscano NC (2006b) Susceptibility
mealybug, Pseudococcus maritimus (Hom.: of immature stages of Homalodisca coagulata
Pseudococcidae), on Concord grape in Washington. (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) to selected insecticides.
J Entomol Soc Br Columb 82:36 J Econ Entomol 99:18051812
Gullan PJ, Kosztarab M (1997) Adaptations in scale Sanderson JP, Roush RT (1992) Monitoring resistance in
insects. Annu Rev Entomol 42:2350 greenhouse whitey (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) with
Horowitz R, Kontsedalov S, Denholm I, Ishaaya I (2002) yellow sticky cards. J Econ Entomol 85:634641
Dynamics of insecticide resistance in Bemisia tabaci: Serghiou CS (1983) The citrus mealybug, Planococcus
a case study with the insect growth regulator pyri- citri Risso carob moth, Ectomyelois ceratoniae
proxyfen. Pest Manag Sci 58:10961100 Zeller, pest complex on grapefruit and its chemical
Khan AAH, Shad SA, Akram W (2013) Resistance to control. Tech Bull Agric Res Inst Nicos Cyprus 56:17
conventional insecticidesin Pakistani populations of Sayyed AH, Attique MNR, Khaliq A (2005) Stability of
Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae): a potentia- eld selected resistance to insecticides in Plutella
lectoparasite of dairy animals. Ecotoxicology xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) from Pakistan.
22:522527 J Appl Entomol 129:541547
Mallet J (1989) The evolution of insecticide resistance: Thirumurugan A, Gautam RD (2001) Relative toxicity of
have the insects won. Trends Ecol Evol 4(7):1 some insecticides to mealy bug, Planococcus pacicus
(November) (Pseudococcidae, Hemiptera). Ann Plant Prot Sci
Mansour R, Youss FE, Labdi KG, Rezgui S (2010) 9(1):135136
Imidacloprid applied through drip irrigation as a new Tranfaglia A, Viggiani G (1981) Problems of integrated
promising alternative to control mealybugs in Tunisian control in vine-growing in Italy. Boll Zool Agrar
vineyards. J Plant Prot Res 50:314319 Bachic 16:8589
Mendel Z, Gross S, Steinberg S, Cohen M, Blumberg D Valles SM, Koehler PG, Brenner RJ (1997) Antagonism
(1999) Trials for the control of the citrus mealybug in of pronil toxicityby piperonyl butoxide and S, S,
citrus orchards by augmentative release of two encyr- S-tributyl phosphorotrithioate in the German cock-
tid parasitoids. Entomologica 33:251265 roach (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae). J Econ Entomol
Misumi T, Kawakami F, Mizobuchi M, Tao M, Machida 90:12541258
M, Inoue T (1994) Methyl bromide fumigation for Walker JTS, White V, Charles JG (1993) Field control of
quarantine control of Japanese mealybug and citrus chlorpyrifos-resistant mealybugs (Pseudococcus af-
mealybug of satsuma mandarin [Japanese]. Res Bull nis) in a Hawkes Bay orchard. In: Proceedings of the
Plant Prot Serv Jpn 30:5768 forty sixth New Zealand Plant Protection Conference,
Morishita M (2006) Susceptibility of the mealybug, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp 126128
Planococcus kraunhiae (Kuwana) (Thysanoptera: Zettler JL, Follett PA, Gill RF (2002) Susceptibility
Thripidae), to insecticides evaluated by the petri dish- of Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Homoptera:
spraying tower method [Japanese]. Jpn J Appl Entomol Pseudococcidae) to Methyl Bromide. J Econ Entomol
Zool 50(3):211216 95(6):11691173
Myburgh AC, Siebert MW (1964) Experiments on
parathion-resistant mealybugs. Deciduous Fruit
Grower 14:190193
Mealybug Alikes
18
M. Mani and Shaheen Gul

The insects belonging to the family Pseudococcidae also called mealy scales. Yet another group belong-
and Putoidae are called true mealybugs (Williams ing to the genus Ceroplastodes is also being
2004). There are several insects (Coccoidea) simi- wrongly quoted as mealybug (Bhatnagar et al.
lar in appearance, and they are to be called as 1984). The scale insect Stictococcus vayssierei is
mealybug alikes only. By mistake, many of the also commonly called as mealybug-infested cas-
scales belonging to genera Drosicha, Icerya, sava. The following scales are also mistaken as
Perissopneumon (Margarodidae) and Pulvinaria, mealybugs and come under the category of mealy-
Chloropulvinaria, Megapulvinaria, Ceroplastodes bugs look-alike. Icerya genistae (Hempel),
(Coccidae), Dactylopius (Dactylopiidae), Pulvinaria acericola (Walsh and Riley), Pulvinaria
Eriococcus (Eriococcidae), Stictococcus ericicola (McConnell), Pulvinaria psidii
(Stictococcidae), etc. were quoted as mealybugs in (Maskell), Pulvinaria urbicola (Cockerell),
literature. In India, Drosicha mangiferae (Green) Neopulvinaria innumerabilis (Rathvon),
belongs to the Margarodidae and is popularly Philephedra tuberculosa (Nakahara & Gill),
called as mango mealybug, but truly speaking, it Protopulvinaria pyriformis (Cockerell),
should not be called as mealybug. Many species Milviscutulus mangiferae (Green), Ceroplastes
belonging to the genus Icerya (Margarodidae) are ceriferus (Fabricius), Ceroplastes rusci (Linnaeus),
also called mealybugs, like the cottony Icerya Ceroplastes cirripediformis (Comstock),
aegyptiaca (Douglas), and is wrongly called as Ceroplastes dugesii (Lichtenstein), Ceroplastodes
breadfruit mealybug in Pacic Atolls. Another cajani (Maskell), Ceroplastes oridensis
group belonging to genera Pulvinaria, (Comstock), Ceroplastes rubens (Maskell),
Chloropulvinaria, Megapulvinaria, etc. are also Eriococcus azalea (Comstock), Eriococcus quer-
similar to mealybugs when they produce ovisacs, cus (Comstock) and Dactylopius confuses
and are often mistaken as mealybugs. They are (Cockerell). Gregoporia distincta sp.n.
(Eriococcidae) is wrongly named as a mealybug
from material found on a grass of the cereal type in
a reserve in the Western Caucasus (Dantsig 1979).
M. Mani (*)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in
S. Gul
Sher-E-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences
and Technology of Kashmir, Srinagar, India
e-mail: Shaheen.gul@rediffmail.com

Springer India 2016 231


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_18
232 M. Mani and S. Gul

18.1 Breadfruit Mealybug: Icerya et al. (2006) reported Icerya aegyptiaca as mealy-
aegyptiaca bug infestation on Santalum album.

Icerya aegyptiaca is quoted as breadfruit


(Artocarpus spp.) mealybug in Pacic nations. 18.2 Icerya seychellarum
Heavy infestations of the pest, which kills young
leaves and stems, can reduce fruit yields by 50 % In Egypt, Icerya seychellarum (Westwood)
and may even kill mature trees. Insecticides (Margarodidae, Homoptera) was reported as
could not be used for fear of polluting water sup- common white mealybug/ornamental palm
plies. Rodolia cardinalis was used to control the mealybug on Cycas revoluta Thunb (Cycadaceae).
breadfruit mealybug, Icerya aegyptiaca. A preda- Adult female is orange red or brick red, obscured
tory ladybird beetle Rodolia limbata (Blackburn) by a granular covering of waxy secretion, which
from Australia was introduced in the Federated may be either bright canary yellow or white,
States of Micronesia (FSM), where control of the tinged with yellow. It is reported to breed on
mealybug was spectacular. This success was many species of Acalypha, Acacia, Artocarpus,
repeated in Kiribati, the Marshall Islands and Casuarina, Citrus, Cocculus, Cynodon, Croton,
Palau, where similar problems have been caused Cassia, Dodonaea, Grevillea, Morus, Mangifera,
by the mealybug (Waterhouse 1991). This is also Magnolia, Olea, Psidium, Pyrus, Pterospermum,
quoted as Egyptian mealybug Icerya aegyptiaca Rosa and sugarcane (Saccharum ofcinarum)
(Douglas) and reported several fruits and orna- (Rao 1950). Sundararaj et al. (2006) reported its
mental plants in India (Rao 1950). Sundararaj infestation on S. album. The important tree spe-
18 Mealybug Alikes 233

cies affected by this insect include Acacia Incidence of Drosicha mangiferae on ash-
nilotica, A. tortilis, Casuarina equisetifolia, wagandha was reported as mealybug infesta-
Dodonaea viscosa, Grevillea robusta, Morus tion in Jammu and Kashmir, India. The pinkish
alba and Mangifera indica (Sundararaj and nymphs and female adults suck the sap from
Muthukrishnan 2008). the twigs, leaf stock and also along the midrib,
and the infestation was mainly concentrated
on the terminal part of the shoot. Sumnius ves-
18.3 Perissopneumon ferox tita and Cryptochaetum were known to attack
D. mangiferae. In western Uttar Pradesh,
Perissopneumon ferox Newstead is also similar to Drosicha mangiferae has one generation a
mealybug in appearance. Rodolia fumida and year and diapauses in the egg stage in soil for
Leptus sp. were recorded from Malihabad (Singh about 7 months.
1993). Perissopneumon ferox was reported as a The so-called mango mealybug D. stebbingi
new mealybug, Perissopneumon ferox was predated by several coccinellids, but none of
(Margarodidae, Homoptera), on mangoes from these natural enemies were found to give ade-
Uttar Pradesh, India. Heavy infestation of the quate control of D. stebbingi (Rahman and Latiff
pseudococcid P. ferox on mango was seen in 1944, Wadi and Batra 1964, Singh 1993).
Uttar Pradesh, India. Two predators, the cocci- Beauveria bassiana was found infecting nymphs
nellid Rodolia fumida and the Erythraeid Leptus of Drosicha mangiferae in the eld, and the
sp., were seen preying on P. ferox (Srivastava and pathogen was found infecting the margarodid in
Verghese 1985). Perissopneumon tamarindus orchards in ve localities in India. In eld trials
Green was also reported as a mealybug on ber on infested mango panicles, spray application of
and other crops in India (Butani 1973). a suspension having 4.8 106 conidia/ml reduced
populations of D. mangiferae by 33.3100 % in
10 days (Srivastava and Fasih 1988).
18.4 Drosicha spp. An integrated approach involving cultural,
mechanical and chemical methods is ideal for the
Drosicha stebbingi Green and Drosicha mangif- management of mango mealybugs. Raking of
erae are popularly called mango mealybugs soil four times (May, June, August and October)
besides Perissopneumon ferox. Mealybug alikes, in Uttar Pradesh afforded the best control of egg
Drosicha mangiferae (Green) and Drosicha dal- hatching of the margarodid Drosicha mangiferae;
bergiae Green was recorded as mealybugs on 30 % of the eggs hatched, as compared with 68 %
pomegranate and papaya in India. Mealybug for no treatment (Chandra et al. 1989). Complete
alikes, Drosicha stebbingi Green, D. mangiferae control could be obtained by the use of grease
(Green) (Pruthi and Batra 1960), Drosichiella bands round the trunks from the second week of
tamarindus Green and Perissopneumon tama- December. An alternative method proved to be
rindus Green (Butani 1973) were reported as banding with coal tar, which remains effective for
mealybugs on ber in India. Drosicha stebbingii only a relatively short period (Prasad and Singh
Green on forest plants is reported as a mealy 1976). Sticky bands were found to remain effec-
bug occurring throughout the sal (Shorea tive for only a short time (up to 15 days after
robusta) forests of north India. It was also application). The commonly used bands of mix-
quoted as mealybug on Tectona grandis and ture of rosin and castor oil (4:5) and coal tar and
Albizia spp. in India (Joshi 1992). Drosicha grease (2:1) prevented the nymphs from ascend-
mangifera was also recorded as a mealybug pest ing for only up to 56 days after application.
on black nightshade (Solanum nigrum L) and Field tests were carried out in Hissar, India, and
Indian gooseberry (Phyllanthus emblica) from revealed that the slippery band of alkathene sheet
Uttar Pradesh, India. was most effective of all in blocking the ascend-
234 M. Mani and S. Gul

ing nymphs, as an average of 2.79 nymphs per effective against gravid females of the pest.
sample area were able to cross it every alternate Spraying of acephate, methyl demeton, mono-
day as compared with 407.3 nymphs on untreated crotophos, quinalphos, dimethoate and phos-
trees (Lakra et al. 1979). A 30-cm-wide polyeth- phamidon at 0.08 % was able to keep the
ylene band tied round the tree 50100 cm above population of mealybug D. mangiferae under
the ground and with its lower edge plastered over check.
with mud was sufciently slippery to prevent the
passage of Drosicha stebbingi nymphs and much
cheaper than the conventional sticky band (Bindra 18.5 Stictococcus vayssierei
and Sohi 1974). The double girdle band of alk-
athene was more effective as it stopped the few Stictococcus vayssierei Richard has been reported
nymphs of Drosicha mangiferae that managed to as root mealybug of cassava (Manihot esculenta)
cross the rst band (Srivastava 1980). in Cameroon (Ngeve 2003). The larvae and adults
Trunk sprays of quinalphos, diazinon and attack young feeder roots of germinating cut-
methyl parathion at 0.0.750.15, 0.050.1 and tings, causing extensive leaf-fall, wilting, tip die-
0.050.1 % in Haryana were highly effective back and death of plants. Plants that escape early
against ascending rst instar nymphs that had infestation develop normally and tuberize, but the
collected below bands. In Bihar, alkathane mature tuberous roots are small and become cov-
banding was followed by three to four applica- ered with the root scale, making them unattract-
tions to the trunk of 0.04 % malathion or three ive to market. In severe infestations, a mature
of 0.03 % dimethoate, 0.03 % phosphamidon, tuberous root of about 40 cm long may harbour
0.04 % diazinon or 0.05 % thiometon during up to 500 mealybugs. It is most severe during the
January. All these insecticides were equally dry season in lateritic and clayey soils, in elds of
effective when applied to the shoots (after band- depleting fertility and in thinly prepared land
ing of the trunks) in late February and early where planting has been done on the at. The
March. Diazinon and thiometon were too expen- prevalence of the pest in the semi-humid forest
sive for their use to be recommended (Prasad region of Cameroon increased from 12.5 % in
and Singh 1976). Field tests carried out in Delhi 1990 to 87.5 % in 1999. S. vayssierei infestation
indicated that diazinon was the most effective was more severe (30 mealybugs/hill) when cas-
compound and was signicantly superior to sava was planted on the at than when planted on
monocrotophos and chlorpyrifos, both of which, ridges (16 adults/hill). Plants also sprouted better
however, gave fairly satisfactory control of the (91 %) when cassava was planted on ridges than
pest (Srivastava 1980). Infested trees were when planted on the at (71 %). Root yields (31.4
sprayed once, with acetamiprid at 100 g/100 L t/ha) and root numbers (7 roots/hill) were also
of water against rst instar in the second week higher in cassava planted on ridges than in those
of February in Pakistan (Karar et al. 2009). grown on the at (24.5 t/ha and 4.5 roots/hill,
Against Drosicha mangiferae on guava, fenitro- respectively). For plants grown on the at, the
thion at 0.1 % was the most effective treatment, improved clones suffered the least attack by S.
followed by phosalone at 0.07 %, quinalphos at vayssierei, clones 8017 and 8034 showing the
0.05 %, monocrotophos at 0.04 %, parathion- most tolerance (19 and 22 females/hill, respec-
methyl at 0.05 %, and bromophos-ethyl at 0.07 tively) when compared with the local, Meyiboto
% and phosphamidon at 0.03 %. Phenthoate at (49 females/hill). Stictococcus vayssierei was
0.05 %, dimethoate at 0.03 % and malathion at more severe when cassava was intercropped;
0.1 % were less effective (Dalaya et al. 1983). there were 40, 48 and 59 mealybug adults per hill
Among 24 insecticides that were tested against when cassava was intercropped, respectively,
Drosicha mangiferae in Haryana, quinalphos at with maize, groundnuts or maize and groundnuts
0.025 % and fenitrothion, carbophenothion and combined. By contrast, maize suffered no yield
parathion-methyl, each at 0.05 %, were highly depression when intercropped with cassava. S.
18 Mealybug Alikes 235

vayssierei is a major threat to cassava production 18.7 Drosicha dalbergiae


in Cameroon and neighbouring Central African
countries. It calls for emergency integrated con- Drosicha dalbergiae (Stebbing) has been reported
trol measures. With poorly enforced quarantine as almond mealybug in Kashmir, India (Malik
regulations, and the unrestricted movement of et al. 1972). The eggs are laid in clusters and cov-
vegetative planting stakes from one country to ered with cottony ovisacs, exhibiting silky touch
the other in Africa, this pest is likely to become and appearance. The freshly laid eggs are yellow-
an epidemic if strong measures are not taken to ish in colour and oval shaped, which later on
control its spread. The effects of season, rainfall turns brownish in colour during hatching. The
distribution and soil type on oviposition and adult female of D. Dalbergiae is brownish grey in
insect development need to be further studied so colour, devoid of wings, sluggish and similar in
as to determine whether it is the physical or shape as it is in last nymphal instar. Its body is
chemical properties of the soil that play such dif- covered with ash white mealy powder with three
ferential role in pest prevalence and severity. pairs of small black legs. However, males are
Finally, the mechanism of cultivar tolerance to more active and smaller in size with a pair of
pest infestation could be studied to throw light on wings. The pest passes through one complete
plant traits and cultural conditions that could be generation in a year.
exploited in screening cassava clones for yield The pest feeds on both aerial and underground
and pest tolerance. Such studies could lead to the parts of almond plants, colonizing in the collar
early release of improved, mealybug-resistant region of the tree in crevices and at wounded sites
varieties to growers. Orientations for future (Masoodi et al. 1988). On migration to the aerial
research are discussed. Monocropping is recom- parts of the plant, the pest feeds on the plant
mended in areas where pest impact is very severe. phloem and excrete honeydew that cover the
Also, disinfestation of cuttings with insecticidal leaves, trunk and fruits, thus making the fruit
bioproducts should be exploited to reduce pest unmarketable due to development of black sooty
impact. Finally, rhizosphere biocontrol agents mould and sickly appearance.
such as endomycorrhizae should be studied to The management strategy involves with
determine their usefulness in controlling the pest
under farming conditions in Cameroon (Ngeve Raking of the soil around the base of the
2003). infested trees so that egg masses get exposed
to the sun and get killed.
Application of sticky bands around the tree
18.6 Pseudaspidoproctus fulleri trunk so as to check the nymphs from crawling
up the trees (four parts of castor oil and ve
Pseudaspidoproctus fulleri (Homoptera: parts of resin) 0.51 m above the ground level
Margarodidae), has been reported as mealybug during the month of May. It will remain effec-
in Mauritius. Cynodon dactylon was found to tive for a period of 2 weeks after which it
be the preferred food plant of the pest. should be repeated.
Destruction of the plant where it grows as a The soil application of carbaryl (10 % dust)
weed with herbicides is suggested as a method will keep the mealybug population under
of controlling the pest. The predator Rodolia check.
chermesina was observed consuming large Insecticidal spray of methyl-o-demeton
numbers of the pest, and the parasitoid (0.02 %) will exhibit maximum mortality of
Cryptochetum monophlebi is also mentioned as almond mealybug.
a potential biological control agent (Rajabalee The combined effect of carbaryl (10 % dust)
and Banymadhub 1990). and dimethoate (0.03 %) applied as soil drench
236 M. Mani and S. Gul

and foliar spray, respectively, plays a signi- Prasad VG, Singh RK (1976) Prevalence and control of
mango mealy bug Drosicha stebbingi (Green) in
cant role in suppression of the pest (Shaheen
Bihar. Indian J Entomol 38(3):214224
et al. 2014). Pruthi HS, Batra HN (1960) Some important fruit pests of
North West India, Indian Coucil Agricultural Rearch
(ICAR) Bull No. 80, New Delhi 113 p
Rahman KA, Latiff AM (1944) Description, bionomics and
control of the giant mealybug Drosicha stebbingi
References (Homoptera, Coccidae). Bull Entomol Res 35:197209
Rajabalee A, Banymadhub N (1990) Preliminary notes on
Bhatnagar VS, Jadhav DP, Pawar CS (1984) Parasitoids of the mealybug Pseudaspidoproctus fulleri Cockerell
pigeonpea mealy bug, Ceroplastades cajani Mask. Int (Homoptera: Margarodidae), a new introduction to the
Pigeonpea Newslett 3:45 Island of Mauritius [French]. Revue Agricole et
Bindra OS, Sohi BS (1974) A note on control of the Sucriere de lIle Maurice 69(13):6061
mango mealybug in the Punjab. Indian J Hortic Rao VP (1950) Iceryine scale insects recorded from the
31:102103 orient. Indian J Entomol 12:3966
Butani DK (1973) Insect pests of fruit crops and their con- Shaheen G, Zahoor B, Ahmad AS (2014) Management of
trol. Pesticides 7:3335 almond mealy bug, Drosicha dalbergiae Stebbing by
Chandra A, Bhati DPS, Singh KM (1989) Note on the chemical intervention. Ann Plant Protect Sci 22(1):2226
effect of soil raking and irrigation on survival and Singh SP (1993) Biological control of pests. In: Chadha KL,
hatching of eggs of mango mealy bug, Drosicha man- Pareek OP (eds) Advances in horticulture III. Malhotra
giferae Green. Curr Agric 13(12):103104 Publishing House, New Delhi, pp 15911616
Dalaya VP, Rajput SG, Mali AR, Mohite PB (1983) Srivastava RP (1980) Efcacy of alkathene bands to pre-
Comparative efcacy of insecticides against guava vent ascent of mango mealybug nymphs on mango
mealy bug Green. Indian J Plant Protect trees. Indian J Entomol 42(1):122129
11(1/2):138139 Srivastava RP, Fasih M (1988) Natural occurrence of
Dantsig EM (1979) A new peculiar genus of mealybugs Beauveria bassiana, an entomogenous fungus on
(Homoptera, Coccoidea, Eriococcidae) from the mango mealybug, Drosicha mangiferae Green. Indian
European part of the USSR [Russian]. Trudy J Plant Pathol 6(1):810
Vsesoyuznogo Entomologicheskogo Obshchestva Srivastava RP, Verghese A (1985) Record of a new mealy-
61:4647 bug, Perissopneumon ferox Newstead (Margarodidae:
Joshi KC (1992) Handbook of forest, zoology & entomol- Homoptera) on mango from Uttar Pradesh, India.
ogy. Oriental Enterprise, Dehradun, 383p Entomon 10(2):184
Karar H, Arif MJ, Sayyed HA, Saeed S, Abbas G, Arshad Sundararaj R, Karibasavara LR, Sharma G, Muthukrishnan
M (2009) Integrated pest management of mango R (2006) Scales and mealybugs (Coccoidea:
mealybug (Drosicha mangiferae) in mango orchards. Hemiptera) infesting Sandal (Santalum album Linn.).
Int J Agric Biol 11:8184 Entomon 31(3):239241
Lakra RK, Kharub WS, Singh Z, Lakra RK, Kharub WS, Sundararaj R, Muthukrishnan R (2008) Sucking pest
Singh Z (1979) Comparative efcacy of some banding complexes of sandal and their host range in South
materials against mango mealybug, Drosicha mangif- India. In: Gairola S, Rathore TS, Joshi G, Arun Kumar
erae Green. in Haryana. Indian J Entomol AN, Aggarwal P (eds) Proceedings of the national
41(2):170176 seminar on conservation, improvement, cultivation
Malik RA, Punjabi AA, Bhat AA (1972) Survey study of and management of sandal (Santalum album L.).
insect and non insect pests in Kashmir. Horticulture Brilliant Printers, Bangalore, pp 111120
3:2944 Wadi SR, Batra HN (1964) Pests of tropical and subtropi-
Masoodi MA, Bhagat KC, Koul VK (1988) Drosicha dal- cal fruit trees. Entomological society of India, New
bergiae Green (Coccidae: Homoptera) a new pest of Delhi, pp 464466
almond in India. Ann Biol 4:12 Waterhouse DF (1991) Possibilities for the biological
Ngeve JM (2003) The cassava root mealybug (Stictococcus control of the breadfruit mealybug, Icerya aegyptiaca,
vayssierei Richard) (Homoptera: Stictococcidae): a on Pacic Atolls. Micronesica (Suppl. 3):117122
threat to cassava production and utilization in Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Cameroon. Int J Pest Manag 49(4):327333 Natural History Museum/Southdene Sdn. Bhd,
London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Part II
Management of Mealybugs in Agricultural
and Horticultural Crops
Rice
19
Gururaj Katti

19.1 Mealybug Species rice mealybug species Brevennia rehi has under-
gone several modications across space and time
Mealybugs are injurious to rice in several coun- (CABI 2003). At rst, the rice mealybug
tries. Among the species, Brevennia rehi Brevennia rehi was recorded as Ripersia sacchari
(Lindinger) is widely distributed across the world Green by Lefroy (1908), attacking rice in India,
in South and South East Asia, North America and and later, Brevennia rehi was conrmed as the
Australasia (Table 19.1). In a recent report also, valid name for the rice mealybug by Miller (1975).
the rice mealybug has been listed as one of the It has become a primary pest in Bihar, and also in
important pests of rice in Bangladesh (Ahmad other rice-growing states such as West Bengal,
et al. 2011). It is found to cause heavy loss to the Orissa, Bihar, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu,
growers in India and Pakistan. Identication of Karnataka, Kerala and Maharashtra (CIE 1979).

Brevennia rehi (Photo credit: Lyle Buss, University of Florida)

19.2 Damage sheaths, resulting in yellowish curled leaves,


stunting and wilting of rice plant. The mealybug
Both the adults and nymphs are found in seden- populations can be easily noticed in the eld as
tary colonies and suck sap from stems and leaf they are covered by a distinct waxy and powdery
coating. Also, ants frequent the mealybug-
G. Katti (*) infested plants, and sometimes carry the mealy-
Indian Institute of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, bugs to healthy plants. The insect pest attacks
Hyderabad 500030, Telangana State, India rice during the tillering and stem elongation
e-mail: gururajkatti@yahoo.com

Springer India 2016 239


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_19
240 G. Katti

Table 19.1 List of mealybug species recorded on rice in different regions of the world
Species Country/Region Reference
Brevennia rehi (Lindinger) Israel, Iraq, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan Ben-Dov (2008)
and Brazil
Syns: Heterococcus rehi (Lindinger); Bangladesh Alam et al.(1979), Alam and
Heterococcus tuttlei Miller and Bhuiyan (1964)
McKenzie; Rhizoecus cynodontis Nepal Pradhan (1981)
Bodenheimer; Brevennia femoralis
Taiwan Liu and Tao (1988)
Borchsenius
Australia and Papua New Guinea Williams et al. (1981)
India Narayan and Ram (1985), Radja
(1985), Velusamy and Babu
(1986), Gopalan et al. (1987a),
Ghode and Mishra(1988),
Lakshmanan et al. (1988),
Raguraman et al. (1991), Jayarani
and Velusamy (1994)
Bangladesh, Pakistan and Williams (2004)
Philippines
USA Miller and McKenzie (1970)
Chlorozococcus mireorum Matile Cameroon Ben-Dov (1994)
Ferren
Chorizococcus ilu Williams Williams (1970)
Bangladesh Alam and Karim (1981)
Dysmicoccus boninsis (Kuwana) Taiwan and China Liu and Tao (1988)
USA Miller and McKenzie (1970)
Bangladesh Alam and Karim (1981)
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) Williams (1970)
Dysmicoccus oryzae (Wijati) Java Williams (2004)
Bangladesh Alam and Karim (1981)
Formicoccus lingnani (Ferris) Malaysia and Thailand Williams (2004)
Geococcus oryzae (Kuwana) Williams (1970)
Bangladesh Alam and Karim (1981)
Nipaecoccus graminis (Maskell) Williams (1970)
Bangladesh Alam and Karim (1981)
Novaniliacoccus oryzae Ghosh & India Williams (2004)
Ghise
Paracoccus ilu (Williams) Fiji and New Zealand Ben-Dov (2008)
Planococcoides lingnani (Ferris) China Ben-Dov (2008)
Bangladesh Alam and Karim (1981)
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Philippines Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus saccharicola Takahashi Australian and Oriental region Ben-Dov (2008)
Bangladesh Pathak and Khan (1994)
Malaysia and Thailand Williams (2004)
Pseudorhodania oryzae Tang China Ben-Dov (2008)
Saccaharicoccus sacchari (Cockrell) Williams (1970)
Bangladesh Alam and Karim (1981)
Trionymus ceres Williams India and Pakistan Williams (1970; 2004)
Bangladesh Alam and Karim (1981)
19 Rice 241

stages of the rice crop. The infested plants appear develop properly and have a bitter taste; if present
stunted and scorched. High incidence inhibits in normal food, they spoil the avour after being
panicle emergence, and plants may even dry. cooked. The pest is also known to transmit the
Grains from mealybug-infested plants do not virus known as chlorotic streak (Williams 2004).

Damage by Brevennia rehi

19.3 Factors Inuencing the rice nurseries, which provide the main source
Incidence of Mealybugs of infestation. The alternative hosts include
Cynodon dactylon, Cyperus rotundus,
The prevalence of dry period, presence of grassy Echinochloa crus-galli, Echinochloa colona,
weeds, well-drained soils and upland/rain-fed Panicum repens and Paspalum scrobiculatum.
environments are major factors inuencing the The mealybug damage is found mainly conned
mealybug incidence. Increased temperature and to upland and rain-fed environments, particularly
wind velocity and decreased relative humidity in elds with uneven soil surface where the plants
have been reported to increase the incidence of B. grow in relatively dry soil patches. It occurs in
rehi (Radja 1985). Also, the pest infestation is great number during the rainy season.
more severe in unirrigated and upland elds
(Mammen 1976; Pradhan 1981). The planting
dates and irrigation regimes also inuenced the 19.4 Extent of Losses
incidence of rice mealybugs. Early planting and
continuous pounding of irrigation water at 5-cm The rice mealybugs cause heavy losses to crops
depth throughout the growing period resulted in in Bangladesh, India, and Thailand. High density
lower intensity of rice mealybug infestation (>100 mealybugs/hill) causes plants to wilt and
(Gopalan et al. 1987a). Also, type and dosage of die. Despite being a traditional pest in the upland
nitrogenous fertiliser applied affected infestation paddy in the eastern states of Orissa and West
levels: higher levels of nitrogen increased the rice Bengal, there are few reports on the quantica-
mealybug infestation, whereas the application of tion of the extent of rice mealybug incidence or
raw coir pith, raw sugarcane trash and farmyard its damage in India. Banerjee (1956) reported
manure reduced the infestation (Backialakshmi incidence of mealybugs from Midnapore, Nadia,
1994). During the off season, rice mealybugs sur- 24 Parganas, Bankura, Murshidabad and
vive on a variety of grasses, later spreading into Jalpaiguri districts of West Bengal. Satpathi et al.
242 G. Katti

(2005) reported an average damage up to 7 % in timely destroying of the infested plants are useful
the rice-growing areas of West Bengal. Ghode in preventing its spread and impact.
and Mishra (1988) reported a serious outbreak of
its occurrence in Dhenkanal, Cuttack and Puri
districts of Orissa state, the affected areas being 19.6 Varietal Resistance
4,000 ha, 2,780 ha and 303 ha, respectively.
Velusamy and Babu (1986) observed a severe Traditional/local varieties and improved culti-
attack of mealybugs in an area of 100 ha of rice in vated varieties showed low levels of resistance
the Pudukottai district of Tamil Nadu, India. The (Alam et al. 1979; Heinrichs 1983). Radja (1985)
population of adults and nymphs was 650750/ and Gopalan et al. (1987b) reported varieties
hill and the affected plants failed to produce pan- such as IET 8616, AS 89090 and IET 12798 with
icles. Later in two villages of Tamil Nadu, low infestation after screening them under eld
extremely severe incidence of mealybug popula- conditions. Mallikarjuna Rao (1987) found that
tions was reported up to 91.1 per tiller (Nalini TNAU 80030, TM 1087 and CO 43 were toler-
et al. 2011). There was yield reduction in ant, with the outer leaf tip turning yellowish,
extremely stunted rice plants at a population level despite high bug population, while TNAU 831520
of 50 mealybugs/hill (Backialakshmi 1994). The and TNAU 831521 were found to be resistant and
association of high mealybug incidence with the moderately resistant, respectively. Further stud-
occurrence of sheath rot disease further aggra- ies identied more resistant sources such as Ptb
vates the yield reducing potential of this pest in 33, IR 56 and IR 58, Tending, Badal 2, Rathu
rice (Alam and Karim 1981; Lakshmanan et al. Heenati, Ptb 21, Sufaida 172, IR 42 and IR 72,
1988; 1991). Rice mealybugs are also associated Senawee, Sufaida 172, DR 52 and ARC 575
with rice chlorotic streak viruses as the transmis- (Jayarani 1992: Jayarani and Velusamy 1994:
sion studies with the bug were positive. There Backialakshmi 1994). The studies on resistance
have been reports of widespread and severe out- mechanism indicated that feeding by rice mealy-
breaks of rice mealybug infestation with associa- bug resulted in a marginal increase in total phe-
tion of sheath blight and sheath rot diseases in nolic content and a large increase in total sugars,
Bangladesh during the drought years of 1950, reducing sugars, non-reducing sugars, isoleucine
1957, 1966, 1972 and 1979 (Alam et al. 1979). and proline content of the rice plants (Gopalan
Both traditional and improved varieties showed et al. 1987c). Resistant varieties had low total
infestation, and the crop losses were estimated at nitrogen, low potassium and high calcium con-
30 % because of the combined effects of drought tents compared with the moderately resistant and
and mealybug. Pradhan (1981) mentioned B. rehi susceptible varieties (Mallikarjuna Rao 1987).
as a pest of rice in the Terai belt of Nepal which Antixenosis and antibiosis were also reported,
included areas of Sarlahi, Bara, Parsa, Rautahat resulting in low oviposition and egg hatchability,
and Dhanusha. Rice mealybug has also been slow nymphal development, reduced adult lon-
reported as tuttle mealybug-infesting Bermuda gevity and low fecundity. Steam distillate extracts
grass (Cynodon dactylon) in USA (Ben-Dov of resistant varieties adversely affected the ovipo-
2012). sitional behaviour and were toxic to crawlers
(Lakshmanan and Velusamy 1991).

19.5 Management
19.7 Cultural Control
It is difcult to control B. rehi because of its pro-
tective waxy covering over its entire body and a Removal of alternative hosts in the vicinity of the
secure position in between the stalks and leaf eld is recommended to prevent pest multiplica-
sheath; however, early detection of the infesta- tion (Ayyar 1939). It is also advised to infested
tion in the nursery as well as pulling out and plants at the post-panicle initiation stage, burying
19 Rice 243

them in the soil and replanting to prevent further parathion-methyl and demeton (Anantanarayanan
spread of the pest (Alam et al. 1979). Early plant- and Abraham 1957), malathion (Wahed 1959;
ing and regular irrigation had also resulted in Alam 1965), demeton-S-methyl (Alam 1965;
lower levels of mealybug infestation (Pradhan Mallikarjunaa Rao 1987), diazinon, phosphami-
1981; Radja 1985; Gopalan et al. 1987a). The don, fenthion and fenitrothion (Alam 1965;
application of organic products such as raw sug- Alam et al. 1979; Radja 1985; Lakshmanan et al.
arcane trash and farmyard manure reduced the 1991), dicrotophos (Alam et al. 1979), dimetho-
infestation (Backialakshmi 1994). ate (Radja 1985; Gopalan et al. 1987d; Radja
1985), monocrotophos (Mallikarjunaa Rao
1987), Chlorpyriphos and isofenphos as seed
19.8 Biological Control treatment (Rajamani et al. 1987) and phorate as
furrow treatment (Rajamani et al. 1987) were
Few natural enemies have been recorded as poten- recommended for the control of B. rehi. The
tial enemies of different stages of rice mealybugs, organocarbamate insecticides found effective
and no eld release studies have been made. The included fenobucarb (Radja 1985), carbofuran
parasitoids recorded so far are Ceraphron sp., and carbosulfan as seed treatments (Rajamani
Adelencyrtus sp., Cheiloneurus sp., Doliphoceras et al. 1987) and carbaryl as an ovicide (Gopalan
sp., Mayeridia sp., Parasyrphophagus sp., et al. 1987d).
Xanthoencyrtus sp., Rhopus fullawayi, Gyranusa
sp., Aprostocetus sp., Chrysochoris sp., Desostenus
sp., Tetrastichus sp., Lymaemon sp., Callitula sp., References
Diparini sp. and Thysanus sp., while predator spe-
cies include Anatrichus pygmaeus Lamb, Ahmad H, Ahmed A, Kamal NQ, Mia TMA (2011) Final
Report on Consulting Service for Conducting Pest
Domomyza perspicax (Knab), Leucopis luteicor-
Risk Analysis (PRA) of Rice (both Production and
nis Malloch and Scymnus sp. (Cherian et al. 1935; Storage Level) in Bangladesh. Government of the
Ayyar 1939; Manjunath 1968; Prakasa Rao and Peoples Republic of Bangladesh Ministry of
Das 1971; David and Ananthakrishnan 2004; Agriculture quarantine services strengthening pro-
gramme department of Agriculture Extension,
Raguraman et al. 1991; Pathak and Khan 1994 and
Dhaka-1215, 119 p
Backialakshmi 1994; CABI 2003). Recent surveys Alam MZ (1965) Insect pests of rice in East Pakistan and
to explore parasitoids associated with B. rehi con- their control. Agric Inf Ser 3:643655
ducted in two villages of Tamil Nadu, India, Alam MZ, Bhuiyan SR (1964) Studies on the biology of
rice mealybug, Ripersia oryzae Green in East Pakistan.
revealed ve encyrtids, among which Rhopus
In: Alam MZ, Ahmed A, Alam S, Islam Md AA (eds)
nigroclavatus (Ashmead) was dominant. Overall, Review of research, division of entomology, 1947
the parasitisation percentage ranged from 5.09 to 1964. B. Press, Dacca, pp 121122
39.39 %. Emergence of parasitoids per host was Alam S, Karim ANMR (1981) Rice mealybug, Brevennia
rehi in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Zool 9(1):1726
more from adults (17.8 %). The parasitoids were
Alam MZ, Alam MS, Karim ANM (1979) Rice mealy-
more active from the last week of July to the end of bug outbreak in Bangladesh. Int Rice Res Newslett
August but weakened during September due to a 4(5):20
decline in the B. rehi population. The other minor Anantanarayanan KP, Abraham EV (1957) The control of
the rice mealybug, Ripersia oryzae GV in the Tanjore
parasitoids recovered were Adelencyrtus coxalis
delta of the Madras State. Madras Agric J 45:4753
Hayat, Mahencyrtus assamensis Singh and Ayyar TVR (1939) The rice mealybug in South India.
Agarwal and Anagyrus gracilis (Hayat 1970). J Mysore Agric Exp Union 17:179188
Backialakshmi T (1994) Varietal resistance to and damage
potential of rice mealybug, Brevennia rehi (Lindinger)
(Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera). MSc(Ag.) thesis, AC &
19.9 Chemical Control RI, Killikulam
Banerjee SN (1956) On the incidence of paddy pest in
Several insecticides belonging to organophos- West Bengal. Proc Zool Soc Calcutta 9(2):6583
Basu AC, Banerjee SN (1965) The control of Ripersia
phates - parathion (Santhanaraman 1952),
oryzae Green, a mealybug of paddy plant in West
carbophenothion (Basu and Banerjee 1965), Bengal. J Econ Entomol 58:621623
244 G. Katti

Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- Lakshmanan P, Kumar SM, Indira K, Velusamy R (1991)
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Loss of rice grain yield and seedling vigour due to
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- sheath rot and mealybug interaction. Int Rice Res
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic Newslett 16(6):2
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p Lefroy MH (1908) Notes on Indian scale insects. Indian
Ben-Dov Y (2008) The rice mealybug, Brevennia rehi Depart Agric Mem Ent Ser 2:111137
(Lindinger, 1943): new synonyms, and new distribu- Liu TS, Tao CC (1988) An unrecorded rice mealybug of
tion records (Hemiptera, Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae). Taiwan. [Chinese]. Bull Taichung District Agric
Bull Soc Entomol Fr 113(1):8588 Improv Stn 20:6166
Ben-Dov Y (2012) ScaleNet. World Wide Web electronic Mallikarjuna RP (1987) Further studies on rice mealybug,
publication, 5 September 2012 Brevennia rehi (Lindinger) (Pseudococcidae:
CABI (2003) Crop protection Compendium. CAB Hemiptera). MSc (Ag.) thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural
International, Wallingford, www.cabi.org/cpc University, Coimbatore
Cherian MC, Krishnaswamy PN, Ramachandran S, Mammen KV (1976) Occurrence of rice mealybug in
Sundaram CV (1935) The soorai disease of paddy. Kerala. Int Rice Res Newslett 1(2):1415
Madras Agric J 23:397400 Manjunath TM (1968) New records of some parasites and
CIE (1979) Distribution maps of plant pests, No. 401. predators of rice mealybug, Ripersia oryzae Green
CAB International, Wallingford (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Curr Sci 37:354355
David BV, Ananthakrishnan TN (2004) General and Miller DR (1975) A revision of the genus Heterococcus
applied entomology. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing, Ferris with a diagnosis of Brevennia Goux (Homoptera:
New Delhi, 1184 p Cooidea: Pseudococcidae). Tech Bull US Dept Agric
Ghode MK, Mishra RP (1988) Outbreak of rice mealy- 1497:161
bug, Brevennia rehi (Lindinger) during Kharif 1987 in Miller DR, McKenzie HL (1970) Review of the mealybug
Orissa. Plant Prot Bull (Faridabad) 40(1):35 genus Heterococcus (Homoptera: Coccoidea:
Gopalan M, Radja NC, Balasubramanian G (1987a) Pseudococcidae) with the description of a new
Effect of different planting dates and irrigation regimes species. Ann Entomol Soc Am 63:438453
on the incidence of rice mealybug, Brevennia rehi Nalini T, Manickavasagam S, Yadav RS (2011) Field inci-
(Lindinger). Madras Agric J 74(45):225227 dence of rice mealybug Brevennia rehi (Lindinger)
Gopalan M, Radja NC, Balasubramanian G (1987b) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and its gregarious para-
Screening rice varieties for resistance to mealybug. sitoid Rhopus nigroclavatus (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera:
Int Rice Res Newslett 12(4):18 Encyrtidae). Plant Arch 11(2):809812
Gopalan M, Radja NC, Balasubramanian G (1987c) Narayan R, Ram SV (1985) Observations on the outbreak
Biochemical changes in rice plants infested with of rice mealybug during 1982 in Bihar. Plant Prot
mealybug. Int Rice Res Newslett 12(4):45 Bull, India 37(1):45
Gopalan M, Raja NC, Balasubramanian G (1987d) Pathak MD, Khan ZR (1994) Insect pests of rice.
Ovicidal activity of insecticides on eggs of Brevennia International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, 89 p
rehi Lindinger. Madras Agric J 74(2):9498 Pradhan SB (1981) Rice mealybug and its alternate host
Hayat M (1970) Studies on the genera of the family plants. Int Rice Res Newslett 6(4):1112
of Signiphoridae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidioidea) Prakasa Rao PS, Das PK (1971) New records of some
recorded from India. Entomophaga 15(4):387399 natural enemies of rice mealybug, Ripersia oryzae
Heinrichs EA (1983) Status of screening for resistance to Green (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Oryza
the thrips, caseworm, leaffolder. rice bugs and mealy 8:111112
bug. Paper presented at the International Rice Research Radja NC (1985) Studies on the biology and control of
Conference, 1822 April 1983 at IRRI, Manila, rice mealybug, Brevennia rehi (Lindinger)
Philippines (Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera). MSc thesis, Tamil
Jayarani S (1992) Genetic evaluation for mealybug, Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore
Brevennia rehi (Lindinger) (Hemiptera: Raguraman S, Saroja R, Manickavasagam S (1991) New
Pseudococcidae) resistance in rice varieties. MSc parasitoid record on the rice mealybug, Brevennia rehi
(Ag.) thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Lindinger (Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera). Indian
Coimbatore J Entomol 53(1):170171
Jayarani S, Velusamy R (1994) Resistance to rice mealy- Rajamani S, Pasulu IC, Dani RC, Kulshreshtha JP (1987)
bug in white backed planthopper resistant rice variet- Evaluation of insecticides and plant products for the
ies. Int Rice Res Newslett 19(2):13 control of insect pests of rainfed upland rice. Indian
Lakshmanan P, Velusamy R (1991) Resistance to sheath J Plant Prot 15(1):4350
rot (ShR) of breeding lines derived from Oryza ofci- Santhanaraman T (1952) Some experiments on the con-
nalis. Int Rice Res Newslett 16(6):89 trol of the rice stem borer (Schenobius incertulas
Lakshmanan P, Manokaran T, Mohan S (1988) Role of Wlk.) and the rice mealy bug (Ripersia oryzae Green).
mealybugs on sheath rot disease manifestation in rice Plant Prot Bull 4:83100
plants. Trop Pest Manage 34(3):356357 Satpathi CR, Mukhopadhyay AK, Katti G, Pasalu IC
(2005) Integrated management of upland rice insects
19 Rice 245

in West Bengal. (National Agricultural Technology Williams DJ (1970) The mealybugs (Homoptera,
Project) NATP RRPS-22. Monograph No. 1. BCKVV, Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae) of sugarcane, rice and
Kalyani, p 46 sorghum. Bull Entomol Res 60:109188
Velusamy R, Babu PCS (1986) Occurrence of rice mealy- Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
bug in Tamil Nadu, India. Int Rice Res Newslett Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
11(4):35 London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Wahed AT (1959) Pests of paddy and their control mea- Williams DJ, Radunz LAJ, Brookes HM (1981) The rice
sures with special reference to resistance. In: mealybug Brevennia rehi (Lindinger) now recorded
Proceedings of the First International Rice Breeding from Australia and Papua New Guinea (Hemiptera:
Training Centre, Dacca, February 1628, pp 113118 Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae). J Aust Entomol Soc 20:46
Wheat
20
Srinivasa Babu Kurra, Jeyakumar Ponnuraj,
and Shyam Prasad Gogineni

20.1 Species include several important crops, such as alfalfa,


barley, clover, rye and wheat (Malumphy 2011).
Mealybugs are injurious to wheat (Triticum vul- The Haanchen barley mealybug, Trionymus
gare) in Ukraine, Hungary, Italy, Tibet, California, haancheni McKenzie, has been detected in wheat
Armenia, India etc (Table 20.1). in large areas of Idaho (http://www.agri.state.id.us/
The mealybug species which occur in the Categories/PlantsInsects/RegulatedAndInvasive
cottonwheat cropping system in north India Insects/Documents/Haanchen%20 Barley11.pdf)
are solenopsis mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis (Fig. 20.1).
(Tinsley), pink hibiscus mealybug In India, the wheat crop of 1030 days old was
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) and striped found attacked by the mealybug M. hirsutus
mealybug Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) (Jat et al. (Monga 2007). The 10 ha of wheat crop in village
2010). Among these, Ph. solenopsis is the most Jodhkan, district Sirsa (Haryana), has been found
predominant species. The occurrence of mealy- infested with mealybugs. In district Fatehabad,
bug Maconellicoccus hirsutus was observed on the infestation of the mealybug was observed on
wheatmustard cropping areas in Punjab, India, wheat around which cotton stalks infested with
and the incidence declined by end of December, mealybugs are kept (Monga 2007). The mealy-
probably due to low temperature (Monga 2007). bug was seen on wheat but was not proliferating
Phenacoccus parvus Morrison is among the as it could not establish on the wheat crop. It was
plants grown close to infested Lantana camara in seen migrating through stubbles and heaps of
Queensland (Swarbrick and Donaldson 1991). cotton stalks, and even developmental stages of
Phenacoccus hordei (Lindeman) has been the mealybug were seen on wheat during
reported from Britain. It is a root-feeding species December, at two places, namely, Sahidanwali
that occurs throughout Europe and its hosts (Abohar) and Katiawali (Malot) of Ferozepur
district in Punjab state, India.

S.B. Kurra (*) S.P. Gogineni 20.2 Management


ICAR-Indian Institute of Millets Research,
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad 500030, India
e-mail: bkurra@hotmail.com To manage this pest, the following pest manage-
J. Ponnuraj ment strategy was advocated in north zone, cov-
ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, ering the state of Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad 500030, India in India.

Springer India 2016 247


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_20
248 S.B. Kurra et al.

Table 20.1 List of mealybugs recorded on wheat


Mealybug Species Country Reference
Euripersia amnicola (Borchsenius) Ukraine Ben-Dov (1994)
Euripersia tomalinii (Newstead) Palaearctic region Ben-Dov (1994)
Heterococcus tritici (Kiritshenko) Ukraine Ben-Dov (1994)
Peliococcus turanicus (Kritshenko) Palaearctic region Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus evelinae (Tereznikova) Hungary, Italy Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) India Jat et al. (2010)
Phenacoccus tergrigaorianae (Borchsenius) Armenia Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcoides lindingeri (Bodenheiemr) Egypt, Israel Ben-Dov (1994)
Rhizoecus tritici (Borchsenius) Ukraine Ben-Dov (1994)
Trionymus haancheni (McKenzie) Idaho, California (http://www.agri.state.id.us/Categories/
PlantsInsects/RegulatedAndInvasiveInsects/
Documents/Haanchen%20Barley11.pdf)
Tibetococcus triticola (Tang) Tibet Ben-Dov (1994)
Trionymus ascripticius (Williams) Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Trionymus utahensis (Cockerell) California Ben-Dov (1994)

50 EC (500 ml), quinalphos 25 EC (800 ml),


acephate 75 SP (800 g), chlorpyriphos 20 EC
(2000 ml), per hectare in 125150 l of water with
manually operated knapsack sprayer or 75 l with
the shoulder- and tractor-mounted sprayers for
the control of mealybugs is advocated in India.
It is advised to rotate the insecticides of different
groups in two consecutive sprays. In case of
severe infestation, the sprays at 57-days interval
are to be repeated.

Fig. 20.1 Wheat leaf damaged by the mealybug

20.2.1 Cultural References


Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the
Alternate host plants growing on eld bunds,
mealybugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera:
water channels and wastelands in the area are Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on
to be uprooted and destroyed during the off geographical distribution, host plants, biology and eco-
season of cotton. nomic importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
Jat MC, Babu KS, Sharma AK (2010) Mealybug an
The uprooted infested plants in cotton elds/
important pest in cotton-wheat cropping system.
water channels should be thrown to far-off Wheat Barley Newslett 3(2):6
areas to check further spread of mealybugs. Malumphy C (2011) Barley mealybug Phenacoccus
hordei (Lindeman) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), new
to Britain, with an updated key to native Phenacoccus
species. Entomol Gaz 62(3):165171
Monga D (2007) Mealybug infestation in Wheat in
20.2.2 Chemical Measures Haryana. Posted on www.ncipm.org.in/mealybugs/
MealybugHaryana.doc
Swarbrick JT, Donaldson JF (1991) Host range studies
The use of the following insecticides, carbaryl 50
with the lantana mealybug (Phenacoccus parvus
WP (1 kg), thiodicarb 75 WP (250 g), profenophos Morrison). Plant Prot Q 6(2):6869
Barley
21
M. Mani

21.1 Species host. Coupled with a short generation time, the


ability to reproduce asexually can allow mealy-
The Haanchen barley mealybug (Trionymus bug infestations to increase quickly to damaging
haancheni McKenzie) was rst detected in levels (Fig. 21.1).
Northern California as a pest of cv. Haanchen
barley in the 1950s. At that time, the mealybug
developed large populations on part of 15,000 21.2 Damage
acres of barley in California, causing damage and
hampering harvesting operations due to the These damage symptoms are caused by mealy-
sticky honeydew (Osborn 1951). It has recently bugs injecting toxic saliva into the plant. Both
been detected in the Northern Plains and Pacic nymphs and adults feed with sucking mouthparts
Northwest barley production areas (Alvarez and reduce the amount of chlorophyll in the
2004). Seriousness of T. haancheni was reported leaves, causing extensive yellowing and brown-
in Idaho, Montana, and Alberta. The mealybug ing of foliage, reduced vigor, and root damage.
outbreak in Idaho in 2003 caused millions of dol- Heavy infestations in commercial elds eventu-
lars in damage to barley. This insect has been ally kill the plants. Early signs of Haanchen
detected in wheat, but it primarily damages bar- mealybug infestation include cottony-like wax
ley. Haanchen mealybug infestations in irrigated secretions at the plant base, often accompanied
barley have been widespread throughout many by extensive honeydew deposits and black sooty
northern Montana counties in 2007. Crawlers can mold. Abundant, sticky honeydew was the rst
also be transported to other plants by wind, peo- sign of mealybug infestation when detected. The
ple, or animals. Crawlers develop through sev- mealybug excretes honeydew, affecting grain
eral successive nymphal instars that resemble quality and also harvesting operations. The
small adults, each of which have legs and so can Haanchen mealybug is apparently able to survive
actively move, until the mature adult stage is winter, where it is protected by soil and plant
reached and the cycle repeats. The number of material. Mild winter conditions in southeast
generations in Idaho is still unknown, but all Idaho during the past few years perhaps explain
instars can be found at a single time on a plant increased population densities. One could also
speculate that outbreaks are related to the elimi-
M. Mani (*) nation of mealybug parasitoids after the applica-
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, tion of insecticides directed against other barley
Bangalore 560089, India pests such as cereal leaf beetle, cutworms, and
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 249


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_21
250 M. Mani

Fig. 21.1 Barley mealybug and mealybug damage in the barley eld

aphids (http://www.agri.state.id.us/Categories/ insecticides, perhaps might provide some control.


PlantsInsects/RegulatedAndInvasiveInsects/ Repeated applications are needed to reduce infes-
Documents/Haanchen%20Barley11.pdf). tation levels.
Tillage may be a viable alternative for reducing
populations of Haanchen mealybugs. Seed treat-
21.3 Management ments, which include Cruiser 5 FS (0.5 oz/cwt) or
Gaucho 480 F (0.751.0), may offer proactive
The concealed feeding habit of T. haancheni, and control of Haanchen mealybug in future spring
the fact that the eggs are protected inside the cot- plantings. Proactive seed treatments should be
tony ovisacs, would further complicate manage- used for insects only if you have had a history of
ment attempts and limit the insecticide use in yield loss from a particular insect. Either tillage or
barley because insects sheltered under leaf seed treatments should be viewed as proactive
sheaths or ovisacs would be protected from con- options producers may consider for future plant-
tact sprays. ings against Haanchen mealybug. (http://wiki.bug-
The most basic elements of an integrated pest wood.org/HPIPM:Haanchen_Mealybug).
management program are lacking for this pest. Biological control with parasitoids and preda-
Currently, no insecticides are registered for use tors has been the most effective and long- lasting
against this mealybug on barley. However, insec- management option. Two parasites were recorded
ticide lambda-cyhalothrin with a surfactant on Haanchen mealybugs at Idaho. The more
(Activator 80) applied at the tillering stage of bar- dominant and numerous parasite was a Rhopus
ley reduced mealybug populations by 60 % when spp. Few predators were observed in Idaho dur-
compared with an untreated control. Mealybug ing the outbreak of the mealybugs.
control in other crops typically targets the small,
highly mobile crawler stage because it tends to be
more vulnerable than the later, larger life stages. References
Applications often are timed for the week after
egg laying begins so as to kill the nymphs Alvarez JM (2004) Trionymus haancheni McKenzie: a
new pest of barley in Idaho. Online. Plant Health Prog.
before they develop to the egg-laying adult stage.
doi: 10.1094/PHP-2004-0315-01-HM
Foliar-applied contact insecticides that also have Osborn F (1951) Insect pest survey. Calif Dep Agrice Mon
fumigant action (so that the chemical penetrates Bull 40:150155
to insects behind leaf sheaths), or systemic
Groundnut
22
G. Harish and M.V. Nataraja

22.1 Mealybug Species favorable environmental conditions, the plants


were found infested by mealybugs at alarming
Mealybugs are injurious to groundnut found in population levels of 23 nymphs per nodule. They
many countries (Nandagopal and Prasad 2004). feed on nodules and cut off the nutrient supply to
The species of mealybugs that are known to plants (Singh et al. 1986). In Taiwan, D. brevipes
infest groundnut in different countries are listed was discovered to infest on the basal part and roots
in Table 22.1. of some groundnuts in a eld near a pineapple
plantation. The infested plants showed leaf yel-
lowing and wilting, and marked growth retarda-
22.2 Damage tion (Huang et al. 2002). All stages of mealybug
were feeding on roots up to a depth of 22 cm. A
The damage symptoms produced by groundnut symbiotic relationship was observed between
plants due to infestation of mealybugs vary mealybug and ant, Monomorium spp., which are
depending on the mealybug species, part of plant found in huge numbers attending mealybugs at
which it attacks, and stage of the crop. The dam- infestation sites (Rajagopal et al. 1982). Das and
age symptoms for each mealybug species attack- Ray (1988) reported that this mealybug can cause
ing groundnut are given below (Fig. 22.1af). yield loss up to 25 % in groundnut.

22.2.1 Dysmicoccus brevipes 22.2.2 Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell)


(Cockerell)
Ferrisia virgata is commonly known as striped
Dysmicoccus brevipes is commonly called as mealybug and is found attacking groundnut
pineapple mealybug and is found on the roots of (Ahmed and Hasan 2009). The mealybug was
the groundnut. It lives in colonies underground, also found associated with pods, pegs, green
and few may be seen on foliage. If found on foli- succulent stems, and branches at the transitional
age, they can be seen infesting the under surface of zone of stems, roots, and on abaxial surfaces
the leaves (base and on either side veins). Under of lower leaves. The nymphs and adult females
suck sap from underground pods, pegs, stems,
G. Harish (*) M.V. Nataraja and branches and underside of the lower leaves,
Directorate of Groundnut Research, causing enormous damage to groundnut crops
Junagadh, Gujarat, India (Anonymous 2003; Ahmed and Hasan 2009).
e-mail: hari4065@gmail.com

Springer India 2016 251


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_22
252 G. Harish and M.V. Nataraja

Table 22.1 List of mealybugs reported on groundnut in different countries


Species Region/Country Reference
Dysmicoccus arachidis sp.n. India Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) Many countries Lepage (1938), Hosny (1940),
Williams (1985), Williams and
Watson (1988), Williams and
Granara de Willink (1992),
Ben-Dov (1994)
Taiwan Huang et al. (2002)
India (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Rajagopal et al.(1982), Singh
Tripura) et al. (1986), Das and Ray (1988)
Dysmicoccus lepelleyi (Betrem) Indonesia Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus mallis De Lotto Uganda Ben-Dov (1994)
Ferrisia consobrina Williams and Australian, Ethiopian, Neotropical Ben-Dov (1994)
Watson and Pacic region
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) Asia, Africa, Australia and Pacic Anonymous (1975), Williams
Islands, North, South and Central (2004)
America, Bangladesh
India (Gujarat) Anonymous (2003)
Formicoccus polysperes sp.n. India Williams (2004)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) Caribbean, Africa, South East Asia, Chang and Miller (1996), Hoy
Northern Australia et al. (2011), Williams (1996)
India (Andhra Pradesh) Rao and Srinivasan (1987)
Paracoccus marginatus William and Ghana Cham et al.(2011)
Granara de Willink India (Tamil Nadu) Selvaraju and Sakthivel (2011)
Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley Central America, Caribbean, Lysandrou et al. (2012)
Ecuador, Chile, Argentina, Brazil,
and China
India (Gujarat) Unpublished
Planococcus bendovi sp.n. India Williams (2004)
Planococcus furcisetosus Mamet Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus japonicus Cox China Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus lilacinus Cockerell Asia, Africa Hill (1975), Cox (1989),
Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus mali Ezzat and McConnell Planococcus mali Ezzat and Williams (2004)
McConnell
Planococcus minor Maskell Ben-Dov (1994),
India Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus calceolariae Maskell Mauritius DEmmerez de Charmony and
Gebert (1921), Williams (1985),
Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus spp. Africa, South and Central America, Hill (1975, 1983)
and Australia

22.2.3 Maconellicoccus hirsutus colonies are often found feeding on underground


(Green) plant parts like the taproot, pegs, and pods, result-
ing in reduced growth and development of pods.
Maconellicoccus hirsutus is commonly known as Mealybugs pierce and suck sap from the plant tis-
pink hibiscus mealybug and reported on ground- sue, resulting in stunted plant growth. In Australia,
nut from Florida along with other host plants heavy mealybug infestation was observed in
(Hoy et al. 2011). In groundnut, mealybug poorly drained areas, resulting in the collapse of
22 Groundnut 253

Fig. 22.1 (a) Roots infested with mealybugs, (b) (e) Mealybugs feeding on stem, (f) Eggs inside the protec-
Mealybugs feeding on leaves, (c) Mealybugs on either tive pouch (ovisac)
sides of vein, (d) Pegs and pods infested with mealybugs,
254 G. Harish and M.V. Nataraja

groundnut kernels, and they turn into black (http:// occurred during February and March months
www.daff.qld.gov.au/26_14460.htm). (Rao and Srinivasan 1987). In Gujarat, F. virgata
was observed on harvested groundnut plants in
the month of May (Anonymous 2003). In Ghana,
22.2.4 Paracoccus marginatus Paracoccus marginatus was found infesting ground-
William and Granara de nut during July to March months (Cham et al.
Willink 2011). In Sind and Punjab provinces of Pakistan,
Phenacoccus solenopsis peak population was
Paracoccus marginatus William and Granara de observed during the rst week of September on
Willink is commonly called as papaya mealybug groundnut (Abbas et al. 2010; Lysandrou et al.
and is also known to infest groundnut, and its 2012). It was also recorded during June to October
degree of infestation recorded was below 15 % in (2012) in Junagadh district of Gujarat.
Tamil Nadu, India (Selvaraju and Sakthivel
2011). It was also reported infesting groundnut
from Akraman and Nsawam regions of Ghana 22.4 Management
(Cham et al. 2011).
Managing mealybugs on groundnut crop requires
a holistic approach through proper integration of
22.2.5 Phenacoccus solenopsis several pest management tactics such as cultural,
Tinsley mechanical, physical, biological, behavioral, and
chemical measures.
Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley is commonly
called as solenopsis mealybug, a polyphagous
pest known to multiply on different host plants, 22.4.1 Cultural Control
including groundnut. In Australia, it was found
attacking groundnut (http://www.daff.qld.gov. Crop should be kept free from weeds and
au/26_14460.htm). In India, it was rst time alternate hosts harboring the mealybugs.
recorded infesting GG-20, a variety of groundnut Plants should be maintained in healthy condi-
during kharif, in 2012 in Junagadh district of tion and avoid water stress.
Gujarat. These mealybugs were also found asso-
ciated with pods, pegs, green succulent stems,
and branches. 22.4.2 Mechanical Control

Ant colonies that are located near the soil sur-


22.2.6 Pseudococcus spp. face are to be destroyed during land
preparation.
It is found to infest foliage of groundnut in Africa,
Australia, Central America, and South America
(Hill 1983). 22.4.3 Biological Control

Conservation and release of the natural enemies


22.3 Seasonal Development such as coccinellids (Cryptolaemus montrouz-
ieri Mulsant; Brumoides suturalis (Fabricius)
The seasonal occurrence of the mealybugs varied and Scymnus coccivora Ramakrishna Ayyar),
largely from one region to another. In Andhra syrphids and lycanid, and Spalgis epeus
Pradesh, India, D. brevipes was reported to occur (Westwood) in general for all the mealybugs,
on groundnut during September and October and also release of host-specic parasitoids
months (Singh et al. 1986), whereas M. hirsutus for the respective mealybugs.
22 Groundnut 255

Foliar spray of Verticillium lecanii (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in two ecological zones


of Ghana. Res Zool 1(1):17
(Zimmerman) or Beauveria bassiana (Bals.-
Chang LWH, Miller CE (1996) Pathway risk assessment:
Criv.) (2 108 cfu/ml) at 5 g/ml/l of water is pink mealybug from the Caribbean. Planning and Risk
effective during high humid months in reduc- Analysis Systems, Policy and Program Development,
ing the population of mealybugs (Tanwar et al. APHIS, USDA, USA
Cox JM (1989) The mealybug genus Planococcus
2007).
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist
58(1):178
DEmmerez de Charmony D, Gebert S (1921) Insect pests
22.4.4 Chemical Control of various minor crops and fruit trees in Mauritius.
Bull Entomol Res 12:181190. doi:10.1017/
S0007485300045004
Chemicals such as pirimiphos-methyl or tri- Das BB, Ray S (1988) Insect pest incidence of groundnut
azophos are effective against rst instar in Tripura. Indian J Entomol 50(3):387388
mealybugs (Persad and Khan 2000). Soil Hill DS (1975) Agricultural insect pest of the tropics and
their control. Cambridge University Press, London,
application of aldicarb at 1 kg a.i./ha 15 days
516 p
after sowing, followed by a spray of chlorpy- Hill DS (1983) Agricultural insect pests of the tropics and
riphos at 0.5 kg a.i./ha at the base of the plants their control, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press,
was also recommended (Das and Ray 1988). London, 746 p
Hosny M (1940) On coccids found on roots of plants in
Use dichlorovos (0.2 %) in combination with
Egypt. Bull Ministry Agric Egypt 237:21
sh oil rosin soap (25 g/l) as the spray helps to Hoy MA, Hamon A, Nguyen R (2011) Pink Hibiscus
control the mealybugs (Tanwar et al. 2007). Mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green). http://
Drenching with chlorpyriphos 20 EC at 2.5 edis.ifas.u.edu
Huang SH, Wong CY, Cheng CH (2002) A newly recorded
ml/l, or apply 5 % malathion dust at 25 kg/ha,
insect pest, pink pineapple mealybug (Dysmicoccus
is also advised to control the mealybugs on brevipes (Cockerell)) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae),
groundnut. infesting on the roots of peanut in Taiwan [Chinese].
Plant Prot Bull (Taipei) 44(2):141146
Lepage HS (1938) Catalgo dos Coccdeos do Brasil.
Revista do Museu Paulista, So Paulo 23:327491
Lysandrou M, Ahmad M, Longhurst C (2012)
References Management of mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis
Tinsley in cotton with a new sap feeding insecticide
Abbas GM, Arif J, Shaq M, Aslam M, Saeed S (2010) Sulfoxaor. J Agric Res 50(4):493507
Host plants, distribution and overwintering of cotton Nandagopal V, Prasad TV (2004) World list of insects and
mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis, Hemiptera: non-insect pests of groundnut and their natural ene-
Pseudococcidae). Int J Agric Biol 12(3):421425 mies, Technical bulletin. National Research Centre for
Ahmed KN, Hasan MR (2009) Sudden outbreak of Groundnut (ICAR), Junagadh, India, 9 p
mealybug and armoured scale causing severe damage Persad A, Khan A (2000) The effect of ve insecticides on
to economic crops in Bangladesh. http://www.aap- Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Homoptera:
pbckv.org/journal/archive/6%20Sudden%20out- Pseudococcidae) and its natural enemies Anagyrus
break%20of%20mealybug.pdf kamali (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) and Cryptolaemus
Anonymous (1975) A brief review of work done on the montrouzieri and Scymnus coccivora (Coleoptera:
white grub Holotrichis cansangunea Blanch in Coccinellidae). Int Pest Control 42(5):170173
Gujarat. White Grub Newslett 1:4144 Rajagopal D, Siddaramegowda TK, Rajagopal BK (1982)
Anonymous (2003) A new pest on groundnut. NRCG Incidence of pineapple mealy bug, Dysmicoccus brevi-
Newslett 2(2):1 pes (Cockerell) on rhizobium nodules of red gram and
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- groundnut. J Soil Biol Ecol 2(2):9798
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Rao DVS, Srinivasan S (1987) Maconellicoccus hirsutus
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- (Green), a new mealybug pest of groundnut in Andhra
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic Pradesh. Entomon 12(2):115
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, UK, 686 p Selvaraju NG, Sakthivel N (2011) Host plants of papaya
Cham D, Davis H, Ofori DO, Owusu E (2011) Host range mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus Williams and
of the newly invasive mealybug species Paracocccus Granara de Willink.) in Tamil Nadu. Karnataka J Agric
marginatus Williams and Granara De Willink Sci 24(4):567569
256 G. Harish and M.V. Nataraja

Singh TVK, Goud TR, Azam KM (1986) Attack of mealy- cies from southern Asia. Bull Entomol Res
bug, Dysmicoccus breviceps on groundnut. Indian 86:617628
J Entomol 48(3):358 Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Tanwar RK, Jeyakumar P, Monga D (2007) Mealybugs Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
and their management, Technical bulletin no. 19. London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, New Williams DJ, Granara de Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs
Delhi, 16 p of Central and South America. CAB International,
Williams DJ (1985) Australian mealybugs. British London, 635 p
Museum (Natural History), London, 431 p Williams DJ, Watson GW (1988) The scale insects of the
Williams DJ (1996) A brief account of the hibiscus mealy- tropical south pacic region, part 2: the mealybugs
bug Maconellicoccus hirsutus, a pest of agriculture (Pseudococcidae). CAB International Institute of
and horticulture, with descriptions of two related spe- Entomology, Wallingford, 260 p
Sunower
23
K.S. Jagadish, Chandrashekar, H. Basappa,
G. Basana Gowda, and Y.G. Shadakshari

In recent years, the mealybugs are found to infest likelihood of severe incidence of this mealybug
sunower crop in different sunower-growing on sunower crop in Punjab, Haryana and Gujarat
regions. Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) whenever this pest causes severe damage to cot-
(Basappa 2007; Jagadish et al. 2008), ton crop (Basappa 2008).
Maconellicocus hirsutus (Green) (Basappa 2008;
Rathod et al. 2008) and Paracoccus marginatus
(Williams and Granara de Willink) (Jagadish 23.1 Bionomics
et al. 2010) are known to attack sunower in
India. In Australia also, Ph. solenopsis was found The total developmental period of egg to adult P.
attacking sunower (http://www.daff.qld.gov. solenopsis on sunower was completed in 2030
au/2614460.htm). Phenacoccus madeirensis days and the fecundity of female was about 500
(Green) is also known to infest sunower (Bend- 650 nymphs (Basappa 2008; Chandrashekar
Dov 1994). 2011; Anonymous 2011). Around Bengaluru,
Phenacoccus solenopsis is the major mealy- India, the mealybug infestation initially appeared
bug species attacking sunower particularly in the rst week of January and gradually
grown nearer to cotton in India. It is found severe increased as the season advanced. Then it
on sunower in different parts of Karnataka increased abruptly to reach 156.20 in the 15th
(Bengaluru, Chitradurga, Bellary, Haveri, standard week (915 April). Later, the mealybug
Bagalkot, Koppal and Gadag districts), Andhra population declined gradually and reached
Pradesh (Nandyal, Kadri, Anantapur, Karimnagar, 113.78 in the 18th standard week (30 April5
Gouraram, Ranga Reddy and Hyderabad), May). The mealybug population remained nil
Maharasthra (Akola, Aurangabad and Jalna dis- during kharif and rabi seasons (JuneDecember)
tricts) and Tamil Nadu (Coimbatore, Tirupur, (Chandrashekar 2011). It was signicantly posi-
Erode, Salem and Namakkal districts). There is a tively correlated with maximum temperature
(0.870**) and sunshine hours (0.509**) and neg-
atively correlated with rainfall (0.177) and
K.S. Jagadish (*) Chandrashekar G.B. Gowda
Y.G. Shadakshari morning (0.627**) and evening (0.743**) rel-
University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, ative humidity. The population of the encyrtid
Bengaluru 65, India parasitoid (Aenasius bambawalei Hayat) was
e-mail: jagsan_san@yahoo.co.in also signicantly positively correlated with P.
H. Basappa solenopsis population (0.985**) and weather
Directorate of Oilseeds Research, ICAR, parameters, namely maximum temperature
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad 30, India

Springer India 2016 257


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_23
258 K.S. Jagadish et al.

(0.845**) and sunshine hours (0.493). The et al. 2008; Chandrashekar 2011; Basappa 2008).
regression coefcient of the mealybug and its Different ant species were found to transfer
parasitoid with weather parameters indicated that P. solenopsis from one sunower plant to another,
the population dynamics of mealybug and para- and also found to provide protection to the mealy-
sitoid was dependent on weather parameters to bug from predators, parasitoids and other natural
the extent of more than 70 % (Chandrashekar enemies (Chandrashekar 2011). Ants were
et al. 2012). responsible for quick colonization of P. solenop-
At Raichur in Karnataka, India, peak infesta- sis to newer areas (Saini et al. 2009) (Fig. 23.1).
tion of P. solenopsis was observed from October
to November, while no incidence was found from
June to September (Anonymous 2011). At 23.3 Damage
Hyderabad, India, maximum population of
mealybug was noticed on sunower from April Incidence of Ph. solenopsis is observed on sun-
to August (Basappa 2008). High temperatures ower a week after germination onwards, up to
along with low humidity are congenial for rapid maturity stage, but the level of damage varies
growth and multiplication of P. solenopsis, while with different phenological stages of the crop.
high-intensity rains and wet spells adversely Sunower is highly susceptible to mealybug
affect its infestation (Saini et al. 2009). attack in the seedling stage. One adult can cause
typical symptoms of curling of leaves, stunted
growth, deformation and death of plants, within
23.2 Ant Association 30 days of germination. At this stage, it could
with Mealybugs cause 100 % crop loss. If infestation occurs at
vegetative stage, symptoms of curling of leaf,
Ten species of ants, namely Paratrechina longi- stunted growth and deformation without death of
cornis (Latreille), Myrmicaria brunnea plant were observed, but the plant could not pro-
(Saunders), Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus), duce owers; however, it could cause 100 % loss
Tapinoma melanocephalum (Fabricius), in patches. If incidence is at the reproductive
Camponotus sericius (Fabricius), Solenopsis stage of the crop, it affects ower buds and ow-
geminata (Fabricius), Anoplolepis gracilipes ers, leading to deformation of head without seed
(Smith), Camponotus compressus (Fabricius), set. In some cases, partial seed setting is also
Monomorium latinode (Mayr) and Oecophylla noticed with about 50 % yield loss (Anonymous
smaragdina (Fabricius), were found attending to 2011; Basappa 2008; Chandrashekar 2011;
the mealybug P. solenopsis in sunower (Jagadish Rathod et al. 2008). The overall appearance of

Fig. 23.1 Ants attending to the mealybugs (a) Monomorium pharaonis (b) Camponotus compressus
23 Sunower 259

the plant was bushy and stunted, with the infested tors was observed from February to April
plants showing a reduction in their height, as around Bangalore (Chandrashekar 2011).
compared to the uninfested plants (Jagadish et al. Activity of natural enemies associated with
2009). Sunower yield in Tamil Nadu slipped to mealybug was more during April to June 2008,
700 kg/acre from the normal yield of 10001200 and later its population was reduced to mini-
kg/acre, mainly due to the mealybug infestation mum around Hyderabad (Basappa 2008).
in the entire growing belt (Anonymous 2009; Lecanicillium lecanii (Zimm.) Zare & Gams
Suresh et al. 2010). At Akola, Maharashtra, 60 % was found to be highly pathogenic to P. sole-
reduction in sunower seed yield was reported in nopsis. At an initial inoculum of 1 104 conidia
the case of Morden variety due to mealybug mL1, lethal time (LT50) was 3.77 and 2.51
attack by Rathod et al. (2008) (Fig. 23.2). days for nymphs and adults, respectively
(Gulsarbanu et al. 2009) (Figs. 23.3 and 23.4).

23.4 Natural Enemies


23.5 Management
Among the natural enemies, the parasitoid
Aenasius bambawalei Hayat found an impor- 23.5.1 Under Glasshouse Conditions
tant one, commencing its activity from the sec-
ond fortnight of January onwards and the Profenophos 50 EC (0.05 %) and buprofezin 25
parasitization was observed up to last week of SC (0.025 %) were signicantly superior in
June. No parasitization was recorded from rst reducing the population of mealybug on sun-
week of July up to second week of January. ower under glasshouse condition
Parasitization percentage ranged between 0.00 (Chandrashekar 2011). Methomyl was also found
and 52 % (Chandrashekar 2011; Basappa effective against mealybugs with lowest popula-
2008). Seven predators, namely Cryptolaemus tion, followed by dichlorvos, dimethoate,
montrouzieri (Mulsant), Brumoides suturalis acephate, azadiractin and malathion (Anonymous
(Fab.), Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fab.), 2011). Basappa (2008) also reported that dichlor-
Scymnus coccivora (Ayyar), Spalgis epeus, vos (2 ml/L), chlorpyriphos (2 ml/L) and pro-
Coccinella transversalis (F.) and Chrysoperla fenophos (1 ml/L) gave more than 8090 %
zastrowi, were found attacking Ph. solenopsis reduction in the mealybug population at 3 and 7
(Basappa 2008; Chandrashekar 2011; days after treatment. Proper preparation of spray
Anonymous 2011; Joshi et al. 2010; Jagadish solution and coverage are more important in the
and Shadakshari 2009). Peak activity of preda- effective management of mealybug on sunower.

Fig. 23.2 Phenacoccus solenopsis on sunower


260 K.S. Jagadish et al.

returns of Rs. 10,230 and Rs. 10,119, respectively.


Dimethoate recorded higher cost-to-benet ratio
(1:24.37), followed by profenophos (1:22.19),
acephate (1:20.69) and methomyl (1:14.21).
Based on the incremental cost-to-benet ratio,
dimethoate, profenophos, acephate and methomyl
were suggested for the management of P. solenop-
sis in sunower (Chandrashekar 2011).
Aenasius bambawalei is a potential of the
encyrtid parasitoid which can be exploited in
managing Ph. solenopsis.
Fig. 23.3 Aenasius bambawalei

References
Anonymous (2009) Mealybug hits sunower yield. The
Hindu Business Line, August 31, p 1
Anonymous (2011) Annual Report of AICRP (sunower)
for 201011, Directorate of oilseeds research, ICAR,
Hyderabad, 215 p
Basappa H (2007) Changing scenario of insect pests of
sunower in India, Proc Winter School on Integrated
insect pests and disease management in irrigation
crops, held at College of Agriculture, UAS, Raichur
(Karnataka), 21 November 2007 to 11 December
2007, pp 625636
Basappa H (2008) Biodiversity of arthropods and verte-
brates in sunower ecosystem. Paper presented in Dr.
Fig. 23.4 Cocoons of A. bambawalei Leslie C. Coleman memorial National Symposium on
Plant protection, UAS, Bangalore, 46 December 2008
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
The fungal pathogen Verticillium lecanii was
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
able to bring about 50 % reductions in the mealy- ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
bug population. Biopesticides may be effective importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
under moderate levels of incidence along with Chandrashekar (2011) Bio-ecology and chemical control
of the mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley
natural enemies (Basappa 2008).
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) infesting sunower
(Helianthus annuus L.). MSc. (Agri.) thesis in
Agricultural Entomology submitted to University of
23.5.2 Under Field Conditions Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, 126 p
Chandrashekar, Jagadish KS, Shadakshari YG, Basan
Gowda G (2012) Ecology and host range of the mealy-
Profenophos 50 EC (0.05 %), methomyl 40 SP bug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera:
(0.04 %), dimethoate 30 EC (0.06 %) and dichlo- Pseudococcidae) in sunower eco-system. In:
rovos 76 WSC (0.15 %) were found to be most Proceedings of national seminar on Recent trends in
Pest management and conservation of our Natural
effective in controlling the mealybug on sunower
Enemies organized by the PG and Research
under eld conditions (Chandrashekar 2011; Department of Zoology, V.O. Chidambaram College,
Anonymous 2011). The insecticides can be used Thoothukudi-628008, from 1516 March 2012, p 3
after initiation of mealybug attack, and second Gulsarbanu J, Surulivelu T, Balamurugan M, Amutha M,
Gopalkrishanan N (2009) Natural occurrence of ento-
spray can be applied after 10 days of rst applica-
mopathogenic fungi in mealy bug, Phenacoccus sole-
tion if the pest population persists (Anonymous nopsis Tinsley in India. In: Proceedings of national
2011). Methomyl 40 SP (0.04 %) and profeno- symposium Bt Cotton: Opportunities and Prospects,
phos 50 EC (0.05 %) recorded maximum net CICR Nagpur, 121 p
23 Sunower 261

Jagadish KS, Shadakshari YG (2009) Sunower mealy Pseudococcidae) on sunower in Karnataka. Insect
bug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Homoptera: Environ 16(3):134135
Pseudococcidae) and its parasitization by Aenasius Joshi MD, Butani PG, Patel VN, Jeyakumar P (2010)
bambawalei Hayat (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), DOR Cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley- a
Newsletter, September, p 7 review. Agric Rev 31(2):113119
Jagadish KS, Shadakshari YG, Jagannatha DP, Karuna K, Rathod PK, Mane PN, Lande GK, Sable YR (2008) First
Geetha KN, Puttarangaswamy KT (2008) Role of ant record of mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green)
(Hymenoptera: Formicidae) fauna in sunower on sunower in western Vidharbha (MS). Insect
(Helianthus annuus L.). Paper presented in Dr. Leslie Environ 14(1):18
C. Coleman memorial National Symposium on Plant Saini RK, Palaram SS, Rohilla HR (2009) Mealybug,
protection, UAS, Bangalore, 46 December 2008 Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley and its survival in
Jagadish KS, Shadhanaikural A, Chandru R, Shadakshari cotton ecosystem in Haryana. In: Proceedings of
YG (2009) Biochemical and morphological changes national symposium Bt Cotton: opportunities and
due to mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley prospects, Central Institute of Cotton Research,
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) infestation on sunower Nagpur, 1719 November, 150 p
(Helianthus annuus L.). Insect Environ 15(1):2830 Suresh S, Jothimani R, Sivasubrmanian P, Karuppuchamy
Jagadish KS, Chandrashekar, Shadakshari YG, Jagannatha R, Samiyappan JI (2010) Invasive mealybugs of Tamil
DP (2010) Papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Nadu and their management. Karnataka J Agric Sci
Williams & Granara DeWillink (Hemiptera: 23(1):69
Pulses
24
S.K. Singh, S.D. Mohapatra, and P. Duraimurugan

24.1 Pigeon Pea 24.94 2.27 C with 70.11 13.10 % relative


humidity, respectively. The sex ratio of male to
24.1.1 Species female was 2.07 in the eld (Borad and Bhalani
1997). Coccidohystrix insolita attained major
Mealybugs are found to infest pigeon pea (red pest status in pigeon pea with the introduction
gram) (Cajanus cajan) in India, Trinidad, Africa of new varieties and necessitating management
and Ghana (Table 24.1). Several scale insects practices (Ganapathy et al. 1994). The mealy-
have been misquoted as mealybugs of pigeon pea bug was found infesting leaves, owers and
in India (Bhatnagar et al. 1984; Shaw et al. 1999; pods. The mealybug was found more devastat-
Singh 2004). ing in Vamban, Tamil Nadu, India.
The damage caused by Coccidohystrix
insolita was characterised by the presence of
24.1.2 Bionomics large congregation of nymphs and adults with
their body covered with white mealy coating
Mode of reproduction of Planococcus cajani is on the under surface of the leaf. The affected
sexual and oviparous. Incubation period of eggs leaflets turn yellow and drop off. The plant
is 5.2 days. The female and male nymphs moult becomes stunted initially. Severe incidence
thrice and four times, respectively, in 18.41 and causes wilting and drying of plants. The
16.26 days at 28.129.9 C and 8493 % rela- movement of ants and development of sooty
tive humidity (RH). Coccidohystrix insolita mould were observed on the mealybug-infested
caused damage to pigeon pea in Gujarat and plants (Durairaj and Ganapathy 2000).
Tamil Nadu, India. The eggs were off-white, Maconellicoccus hirsutus has been reported to
oval and found within the protective cottony cause 15 % plant infestation on pigeon pea in
ovisac. The male and female bugs passed Gujarat, India.
through four and three nymphal instars, respec- Mealybug crawlers were observed on the
tively. It takes 42.14 and 59.49 days for males lower surface of leaves, causing damage by
and females at the eld temperature of sucking the cell sap. In severe infestation, the
pest was found covering the whole leaf surface.
Severely affected plants were stunted. Honeydew
S.K. Singh (*) S.D. Mohapatra P. Duraimurugan excreted by nymphs and adults supported the
Indian Institute of Pulses Research, growth of sooty moulds on leaves and shoots,
Kanpur 208024, India giving blackish appearance to leaves (Patel et al.
e-mail: singhskkanpur@gmail.cm

Springer India 2016 263


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_24
264 S.K. Singh et al.

Table 24.1 List of mealybugs recorded on pigeon pea


Mealybug Species Country/Region References
Coccidohystrix insolita (Green) India Nair (1975), Atwal (1976)
(Centrococcus insolitus (Green)) Gujarat, India Patil et al. (1985), Rai et al. (1988)
Tamil Nadu, India Durairaj and Ganapathy (2000)
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) India Rajagopal et al. (1982)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) Haryana, India Gautam and Saxena (1986)
Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Ghana Cham et al. (2011), Shylesha et al.(2011)
Granara de Willink Karnataka, India Tanwar et al. (2007)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) Gujarat Patel et al. (1990), Rajadurai and Thyagarajan
(2003), Persad and Khan (2006)
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) Ben-Dov (1994)
Nipaecoccus lamentosus India Nair (1975)
(Cockerell) Syn: Pseudococcus
lamentosus Cockerell
Phenacoccus madeirensis Green Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley India
Planococcus cajani Mukherjee and India Mukhopadhyay and Mukherjee (2005)
Mukhopadhyay
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Trinidad Francis et al. (2012)
Planococcus kenyae (LePelley) Africa http://www.infonet-biovision.org/default/ct/94/pests
Rastrococcus iceryoides (Green) India Williams (2004)

1990). Paracoccus marginatus was reported to 24.3 Mung Bean


cause 25 % damage to pigeon pea in Tamil Nadu.
In Haryana, nymphs and adults of the mealybug Geococcus coffeae Green was found sucking the
Ferrisia virgata were found mainly on the ino- leaves, stem and pods of mung bean (green gram)
rescences, causing withering and dropping of (Vigna radiata) (Kooner 2006). Root mealybugs
owers. On heavily infested plants, the popula- D. brevipes and Geococcus coffeae have been
tion of F. virgata ranged from 1 to 2/leaf, 2 to 3/ reported to cause damage to green gram in India.
ower and 10 to 13/inorescence (Gautam and
Saxena 1986). In Bangalore, India, Dysmicoccus
brevipes was found infesting the root nodules of 24.4 Cowpea
red gram in southern India There were two to
three mealybugs per nodule. All stages of the Dysmicoccus brevipes (David and
mealybug were observed, and infestation was Ananthakrishnan 2004), Maconellicoccus hirsu-
noted at the depth of up to 22 cm. More than 80 tus (Persad and Khan 2006) and Geococcus spp.
% of the plants were infested. The ant (Mathew et al. 2011) are known to infest cowpea
Monomorium sp. was found to be attracted to (Vigna unguiculata) in India.
sites of mealybug infestation (Rajagopal et al.
1982) (Fig. 24.1).
24.5 Beans

24.2 Chickpea Paracoccus maraginatus was found infesting


beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Ghana (Cham
Ferrisia virgata was found damaging chickpea et al. 2011), Florida (Walker et al. 2003), Sri
Cicer arietinum by sucking the sap of the Lanka (Galanihe et al. 2010), Palau (Muniappan
leaves. et al. 2006) and Hawaii (Ronald et al. 2007).
24 Pulses 265

Fig. 24.1 Mealybug damage to pigeon pea: (a) P. solenopsis on pigeon pea, (b) P. marginatus on pigeon pea and
(c) P. maraginatus on Phaseolus vulgaris

24.6 Blackgram montrouzieri can be used to control the mealy-


bugs in general. Host-specic parasitoids are
Dysmicoccus brevipes was known to infest black available for the control of mealybugs. For exam-
gram (Vigna mungo) in India (David and ple, Acerophagus papayae Noyes and Schauff
Ananthakrishnan 2004). for P. marginatus can be used to control the
P. marginatus.

24.7 Management
References
24.7.1 Chemical Control
Atwal AS (1976) Agricultural pests of India and South-
East Asia. Pests of pulse crops. Kalyani Publisher,
Monocrotophos (0.04 %) + kerosene oil (0.05
Ludhiana, 175 p
%) + soap (0.02 %) and ethion were found to be Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
highly effective in controlling Coccidohystrix bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
insolita in pigeon pea in South Gujarat (Rai et al. Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on
geographical distribution, host plants, biology and eco-
1988). More than 95 % reduction in eld popula-
nomic importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
tion of C. insolita was observed with applications Bhatnagar VS, Jadhav DP, Pawar CS (1984) Parasitoids of
of lambda-cyhalothrin, dichlorvos and profeno- pigeonpea mealybug, Ceroplastades cajani Mask. Int
phos in Tamil Nadu (Durairaj and Ganapathy Pigeonpea Newslett 3:45
Borad PK, Bhalani PA (1997) Bionomics of mealybug,
2000). Methyl parathion (0.03 %), quinalphos
Coccidohystrix insolita (Green) on pigeonpea. Gujarat
(0.05 %), monocrotophos (0.04 %), cypermethrin Agric Univ Res J 22(2):5762
(0.009 %), endosulfan (0.075 %), diazinon (0.05 Cham D, Davis DLH, Obeng O, Owusu E (2011) Host
%), chlorpyrifos (0.05 %) and decamethrin [del- range of the newly invasive mealybug species
Paracocccus marginatus Williams and Granara De
tamethrin] (0.00125 %) caused 89.2, 88.1, 68.0,
Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in two ecologi-
33.9, 32.1, 30.5, 30.0 and 7.9 % mortality of cal zones of Ghana. Res Zool 1(1):17
C. insolita, respectively, on the treated leaves David BV, Ananthakrishnan TN (2004) General and
(Patel et al. 1989). applied entomology. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing,
New Delhi, 1184 p
Durairaj C, Ganapathy N (2000) Evaluation of certain
synthetic insecticides for the control of pigeonpea
24.7.2 Biological Control mealybug, Coccidohystrix insolites (G.). Pestology
14:4446
Francis MA, Kairo WTK, Roda AL, Oscar E, Liburd OE,
There are many parasitic wasps and various preda-
Polar P (2012) The passionvine mealybug, Planococcus
tory insects that feed on mealybugs. Cryptolaemus minor (Maskell) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), and its
266 S.K. Singh et al.

natural enemies in the cocoa agroecosystem in Persad A, Khan A (2006) Attractiveness of hibiscus
Trinidad. Biol Control 60:290296 mealybug to different plant species. Insect Environ
Galanihe LD, Jayasundera MUP, Vithana A, 11(4):175176
Asselaarachchi N, Watson GW (2010) Occurrence, Rai AB, Patel KG, Jhala RC, Patel CB (1988) Chemical
distribution and control of papaya mealybug, control of mealybug, Coccidohystrix insolita (Green)
Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), (Pseudococcidae: Homoptera) infesting pigeonpea in
an invasive alien pest in Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res Ext South Gujarat. Gujarat Agric Univ Res J 14:39
13(3):8186 Rajadurai S, Thyagarajan V (2003) Mulberry sap sucking
Ganapathy N, Durairaj C, Jehangir KS (1994) Outbreak pests. Indian Silk 42(4):58
of the coccid pests in Tamil Nadu. Int Chick Pigeonpea Rajagopal D, Siddaramegowda TK, Rajagopal BK (1982)
Newslett 1:37 Incidence of pineapple mealybug, Dysmicoccus brevi-
Gautam RD, Saxena HP (1986) New record of white pes (Cockerell) on rhizobium nodules of redgram and
tailed mealybug, Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell). groundnut. J Soil Biol Ecol 2(2):9798
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on pigeonpea. Int Ronald A, Mach TH, Fukad A, Conant P (2007) Papaya
Pigeonpea Newslett 5:3940 Mealybug Paracoccus marginatus Williams and
Kooner BS (2006) Insect pests and their management. In: Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae).
Advances in Mungbean and Urdbean. Indian Institute New Pest Advisory. http://www.hawaiiag.org/hdoa/
of Pulses Research, Kanpur, pp 335401 npa/npa04-03-PMB.pdf. Accessed 2014
Mathew MP, Abraham CT, Smitha MS, Soumya KC Shaw SS, Veda OP, Badaya AK, Parsi SK (1999) An out-
(2011) Weeds as hosts of root mealybugs, Geococcus break of mealybug Ceroplastodes cajani (Maskell) in
spp. Insect Environ 17(1):3435 the Nimar region of Madhya Pradesh, India. Int Chick
Mukhopadhyay AK, Mukherjee G (2005) Biology of the Newslett 6:4546
mealybug, Planococcus cajani Mukherjee & Shylesha AN, Rabindra RJ, Bhumannavar BS (2011) The
Mukhopadhyay (Pseudococcidae: Homoptera). Uttar papaya mealybug Paracoccus marginatus
Pradesh J Zool 25(2):195198 (Coccoidea:Pseudococcidae). In: Proceedings of the
Muniappan R, Meyerdirk DE, Sengebau FM, Berringer National consultation meeting on strategies for
DD, Reddy GVP (2006) Classical biological control deployment and impact of the imported parasitoids of
of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus papaya mealybug classical biological control of
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the Republic of papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) in India,
Palau. Fla Entomol 89:212217 Bangalore, pp 18
Nair MRGK (1975) Insect and mites of crops in India. Indian Singh SK (2004) New record of mealybug Ceroplastodes
Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, 405 p cajani from Kanpur. Insect Environ 10:21
Patel IS, Jose VT, Shah AH, Patel UG (1989) Laboratory Tanwar RK, Jeyakumar P, Monga D (2007) Mealybugs
evaluation of some newer insecticides against mealy and their management, Technical bulletin no. 19.
bug, Coccidohystrix insolita G. of pigeonpea. National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, New
Pestology 13(4):1314 Delhi, 110012, 16p
Patel IS, Dodia DA, Patel SN (1990) First record of Walker A, Hoy M, Meyerdirk DE (2003) Papaya mealy-
Maconellicoccus hirsutus as a pest of pigeonpea bug. University of Florida Featured Creatures. http://
(Cajanus cajan). Indian J Agric Sci 60:645 creatures.ifas.u.edu/fruit/mealybugs/papa. Accessed
Patil GM, Shah AH, Patil MV, Patil CB (1985) First 2014
record of Coccidohystrix insolita (Green) as a pest of Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
pigeonpea in South Gujarat. Gujarat Agric Univ Res Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
J 11:61 London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Soybean
25
M. Mani

Mealybugs are reported to be injurious to soy- feed on plant juices. These whitish crawlers are
bean in India, Kentucky (USA), Sri Lanka, seen attached to the roots (http://extension.entm.
Indonesia, and so forth (Table 25.1). purdue.edu/pestcrop/2011/issue14/index.html).
Pseudococcus sorghiellus has been found in Planococcus citri was known to suck the sap
association with elds that exhibit symptoms from stem at pod formation stage in Maharashtra,
similar to potassium deciency (yellowed leaf India (Jadhav et al. 1996). The development of
margins and stunted plants), often in elds that Pl. citri and the parasitoid Anagyrus pseudococci
recently hosted alfalfa. It seems that this mealy- (Girault) was better on soybeans than on
bug species is fairly common on other plant spe- Streptocarpus hybridus or Aeschynanthus ellipti-
cies, reported from Indiana, Illinois, and cus (Copland et al. 1993). The average develop-
Pennsylvania. The mealybug species is often mental periods of males and females of N.
found to be tended by ants, which eat the honey- vasatator on soybean were 15.46 and 14.62 days,
dew excreted by the mealybugs and in turn pro- respectively. The average preoviposition, ovipo-
tect the mealybugs from predators. Similar to sition, and fecundity were 7.66 days and 78.67
other mealybugs in appearance, these small, eggs on soybean (Saha and Ghosh 2001).
whitish insects live beneath the soil surface and

Pseudococcus sorghiellus on soybean

M. Mani (*)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 267


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_25
268 M. Mani

Table 25.1 List of mealybugs recorded on soybean


Mealybug species Region Reference
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) Ben-Dov (1994)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) Singapore Williams (2004)
Geococcus coffeae Green Ben-Dov (1994)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) Indonesia Williams (2004)
India Rajadurai and Thyagarajan (2003)
Nipaecoccus vastator (Mask.) Madhya Pradesh, India Srivastava (1972)
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Maharashtra, India Jadhav et al.(1996)
Sri Lanka Williams (2004))
UK Copland et al. (1993)
India Williams (2004)
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrhorn) USA Gimpel and Miller (1996)
Pseudococcus sorghiellus (Forbes) Kentucky, Ohio, and Iowa (USA) Tooker (2011)
Pseudococcus sociabilis Hambleton Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)

Potassium deciency symptoms could be a sign of Mealybugs, soybean root


mealybugs below
(Photo credit: Ohio State University)

Dysmicoccus sp. was found to suck the sap


from root and rhizome nodules of soybean grown
References
in sandy soil in Karnataka. The infestation on Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
nodules and taproot began during second fort- bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
night of September and continued up to the last Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
week of October. The population of mealybugs ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
ranged from 6 to 25 per plant. Severely affected Copland MJW, Perera HAS, Heidari M (1993) Inuence
plants showed stunted growth (Thippaiah and of host plant on the biocontrol of glasshouse mealy-
Kumar 1999). bug. Bulletin OILB/SROP 16(8):4447
25 Soybean 269

Gimpel WF Jr, Miller DR (1996) Systematic analysis of Saha A, Ghosh AB (2001) Biological studies on the
the mealybugs in the Pseudococcus maritimus com- mealybug, Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) on various
plex (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Contrib Entomol host plants. Uttar Pradesh J Zool 21(1):7578
Int 2(1):163 Thippaiah M, Kumar NG (1999) Dysmicoccus sp.
Jadhav RG, Madane NP, Kathamale DK (1996) Record of (Pseudococcidae: Homoptera): a pest of soyabean in
soybean as a new host in India for citrus mealybug. Karnataka. Insect Environ 5(2):70
Insect Environ 2:90 Tooker J (2011) A new pest to consider: trochanter mealy-
Rajadurai S, Thyagarajan V (2003) Mulberry sap sucking bug. http://www.farms.com/FarmsPages/
pests. Indian Silk 42(4):58 Commentary/DetailedCommentary/tabid/192/
Srivastava OS (1972) Soybean, a new host record of Default.aspx?NewsID=43316
mealybug, Nipaecoccus vastator (Mask.) (Hemiptera: Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Pseudococcidae) in India. Indian J Entomol Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD.,
34(3):251252 London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Cotton
26
V.S. Nagrare, S. Kranthi, Rishi Kumar,
B. Dharajothi, M. Amutha, and K.R. Kranthi

26.1 Mealybug Species 26.2 Damage

Mealybugs are injurious to cotton in India, Mealybugs are small sap-sucking insects that cause
Pakistan, China, Brazil, Australia, Ethiopia, severe economic damage to cotton. They attack
USA, Emerald and so on. (Table 26.1). Among different parts of the growing cotton plant, namely
the mealybug species, the solenopsis mealybug main stem, branches and underdeveloped owers
Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley was found to that produce bolls of smaller size. The boll opening
cause severe economic damage in all nine major when adversely affected result in serious reduc-
cotton-growing states of India, resulting in loss tion in yield. Excretion of honeydew attracts ants
worth of US $1620 million while reducing and also contributes to the development of black
yields up to 50 % in the affected elds in 2007 sooty mould. Plants severely affected with sooty
(Nagrare et al. 2009). Paracoccus marginatus mould have the appearance of burn symptoms.
Williams and Granara de Willink also caused An infested cotton plant shows the symptoms
havoc on cotton around Coimbatore district of such as white uffy mass on underside of leaves,
Tamil Nadu. Besides these two mealybugs, near growing tips, along leaf veins and on stem,
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead), Maconellicoccus distorted or bushy shoots. Plants infested by
hirsutus (Green), Ferrisia virgata Cockerell, mealybugs during vegetative phase exhibit symp-
Ferrisia malvastra (Mc Daniel) in central India toms of distorted, bushy shoots, crinkled and/or
and Rastrococcus iceryoides (Green) in south twisted bunchy leaves and stunted plants that dry
India were also reported on cotton in traces. completely in severe cases.

V.S. Nagrare (*) S. Kranthi K.R. Kranthi


Central Institute for Cotton Research,
Nagpur 440010, India
R. Kumar
Central Institute for Cotton Research, Regional B. Dharajothi M. Amutha
Station, Sirsa 125055, India Central Institute for Cotton Research, Regional
e-mail: vs.nagrare@gmail.com Station, Coimbatore 641003, India

Springer India 2016 271


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_26
272 V.S. Nagrare et al.

Table 26.1 Mealybug species recorded on cotton in different regions of the world
Species Region/Country References
Ferrisia consobrina Australia, Ethiopia, Williams (2004)
Williams and Watson Neotropical and
Pacic region
Ferrisia malvastra (Mc Daniel) India Jhala et al. (2008), Suresh and Kavitha (2008a)
Ferrisia virgata Cockerell India Saminathan and Jayaraj (2001), Suresh (2008),
Vennila et al. (2010a), Anonymous (2010),
Nagrare et al. (2011), Tanwar et al. (2011),
Nagrare et al. (2012), Anonymous (2013b)
Brazil Torres et al. (2013)
Cambodia Williams (2004)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) India Misra (1920), Dhawan et al. (1980),
Muralidharan and Badaya (2000),
Suresh (2008), Nagrare et al. (2009),
Pinjarkar et al. (2009), Vennila et al. (2010b)
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) India Misra (1920), Vennila et al. (2010b), Nagrare
et al. (2011), Thomas and Ramamurthy (2011)
Paracoccus burnerae (Brain) Ethiopian region Ben-Dov (1994)
Paracoccus marginatus India Anonymous (2008), Amutha et al. (2009),
Williams and Granara de Willink Banu et al. (2010), Dharajothi et al. (2010),
Tanwar et al. (2010),
Jeyarani et al. (2011), Nagrare et al. (2011),
Sakthivel et al. (2012)
Argentina Granara de Willink (2003)
Paracoccus solani Australia, Peru and Ben-Dov (1994)
Ezzat and McConnel Costa Rica
Phenacoccus madeirensis Green India Shylesha and Joshi (2012)
Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley China Wang et al. (2009), Wu and Zhang (2009),
Zhang et al. (2010)
India Dutt (2007), Hodgson et al. (2008), Jhala et al.
(2008), Thomas et al. (2008), Anonymous (2009),
Bhosle et al. (2009), Dhawan and Saini (2009),
Dhawan et al. (2009), Hanchinal et al. (2009),
Kumar et al. (2009a), Monga et al. (2009),
Nagrare et al. (2009), Saini et al. (2009),
Bisane et al. (2010), Suresh et al. (2010),
Vennila et al. (2010b), Hanchinal et al. (2011),
Kumar et al. (2011), Tanwar et al. (2011)
Pakistan Zaka et al. (2006), Muhammad (2007),
Hodgson et al. (2008), Abbas et al. (2009),
Afzal et al. (2009), Abbas (2010), Abbas et al.
(2005), Abbas et al. (2010), Ashfaq et al. (2010),
Khuhro et al. (2011), Sahito et al. (2011)
Brazil Silva (2012)
Ethiopia Anonymous (2013a)
USA Fuches et al. (1991)
Australia Admin (2010), Charleston and Murray (2010),
David and Charleston (2010), IPPC (2010)
Emerald and Burdekin Admin (2010)
Nigeria Akintola and Ande (2008)
Sri Lanka Prishanthini and Laxmi (2009)
(continued)
26 Cotton 273

Table 26.1 (continued)


Species Region/Country References
Peliococcus turanicus (Kritshenko) Palaearctic region Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus minor Maskell Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus neomaritimus Kiribati and Ben-Dov (1994)
Beardsley Marshall Islands
Rastrococcus iceryoides (Green) India Suresh and Kavitha (2008b), Anonymous (2012)
Rhizoecus macgregori Hambleton Mexico Ben-Dov (1994)
Spilococcus eriogoni (Ehrhorni) California, Mexico Ben-Dov (1994)

P. soleneopsis P. marginatus F. virgata

26.2.1 Mealybug Damage to Cotton (148.30 on FH-901), 17 September (141.10 on


Plants Chandi) and 30 September (189.10 on NIAB-
78). However, the highest overall mean popula-
Late-season infestations during reproductive tion (62.34) was recorded on variety NIAB-78
crop stage result in reduced plant vigour and (Sahito et al. 2011).
early-crop senescence.

26.4 Seasonal Incidence


26.3 Varietal Resistance/
Susceptibility Phenacoccus solenopsis appeared on cotton crop
12 months after sowing and remains till harvest
In Pakistan, there was a highly signicant varia- of the crop in Pakistan (Sahito et al. 2011). In
tion in the population of mealybug on 15 varieties Pakistan, maximum mealybug population (Ph.
of cotton crop, namely Cris-134, Chandi, FH-901, solenopsis) was recorded when the temperature
CIM-473, CIM-499, Shahbaz, TH-57/96, was in the range of 30.539.5 C (Khuhro et al.
NIAB-111, CIM-496, Hari dost, Okra leaf, 2011). In Punjab, India, the highest eld infesta-
Sindh-1, NIAB-78, Bt cotton and Okra desi. The tion recorded was mostly in the 30th meteoro-
peak populations were recorded on 8 June 2008 logical week with 14.9, 31.5 and 26.9 % in
(8.80 on TH-57/96), 23 June (43.20 on NIAB- Bathinda, Muktsar and Ferozepur districts,
111), 7 July (57.00 on Cris-134), 21 July (20.40 respectively. In Faridkot, the highest eld infesta-
on Bt), 5 August (36.00 on Sindh-1) and 18 tion of 10.2 % was recorded in the 34th meteoro-
August (72.60 also on Sindh-1), 3 September logical week. Mealybug infestation was positively
274 V.S. Nagrare et al.

Ph. solenopsis Pa. marginatus N. viridis

correlated with temperature, whereas negative during the seventh meteorological week, which
correlation was observed with relative humidity coincides with the higher population of mealy-
and rainfall (Dhawan et al. 2009). bug. Mealybug population was signicantly and
It appeared that high rainfall has washed away positively correlated with maximum temperature
all the small crawlers. Moreover, the high rainfall (0.775) and negatively correlated with other
has favoured the growth of entomopathogens on parameters. Among predators, chrysopids were
the mealybugs. It is evident that enough humidity signicantly correlated with relative humidity
favours the multiplication, but the intense rainfall (0.289) and others were non-signicant. The
adversely affects the spread and reduces the mealybug parasitoid cocoons were positively
intensity (Jeyakumar et al. 2009). In Raichur, correlated with maximum temperature (0.421)
Karnataka, India, mealybug infestation started but negatively correlated with other meteorologi-
appearing in September and gradually increased cal parameters (Hanchinal et al. 2010).
as the crop growth advanced. The population was
0.50/10-cm apical shoot in the 38th meteorologi-
cal week and progressively increased throughout 26.5 Natural Enemies
the season. The population reached to 115.42/10-
cm apical shoot in the third week of January and 26.5.1 P. solenopsis
thereafter increased suddenly to reach 180.42/10-
cm apical shoot in the seventh meteorological 26.5.1.1 Parasitoids
week. Later on, the infestation of mealybug The encyrtid parasitoid Aenasius bambawalei
declined gradually and reached to 146.64/10-cm Hayat was recorded on Ph. solenopsis-infesting
apical shoot in the 14th meteorological week. In cotton and other crops in India (Hayat 2009). It
general, predator population was low during the was reported from north and central India
cropping season. Maximum population of cocci- (Tanwar et al. 2011), Haryana (Ram Pala et al.
nellids, chrysopids and spiders were 0.14, 0.13 2009), Punjab (Dhawan et al. 2011), Tamil Nadu
and 0.16 per plant, respectively, during the sea- (Sankar et al. 2011; Amutha et al. 2009),
son. Parasitoid cocoons ranged between 0.52 and Karnataka (Hanchinal et al. 2009), all in India,
20.02 %. The activity of the parasitoid Aenasius Pakistan (Arif et al. 2011a) and China (Chen
bambawalei started during the 44th meteorologi- Hua-Yan et al. 2010). The parasitoid seems host
cal week and later on increased gradually to reach specic, having excellent searching ability in
the peak during seventh to ninth meteorological attacking mealybugs in colonies as well as those
weeks. Highest parasitoid (20.65 %) was recorded present solitarily on different host plants of
26 Cotton 275

mealybug (Ram Pala et al. 2009). The parasitoid 26.5.2 M. hirsutus


took 1214 days to complete its development
in the host. A female parasitoid parasitized In central India, M. hirsutus was found parasit-
38163 mealybugs during its life of 1135 days. ized by Encyrtus aurantii (Geoffroy), Anagyrus
Third instar nymph of Ph. solenopsis is found dactylopii (Howard) and Anagyrus mirzai
suitable for the breeding of A. bambawalei. Agarwal and Alam (Pinjarkar et al. 2009).
In progeny, the male and female ratio was 1:2
(Fand et al. 2011).
26.5.3 Paracoccus marginatus
26.5.1.2 Predators
Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) was also known On the papaya mealybug Paracoccus margin-
to feed on mealybug crawlers. In Pakistan, atus, the local predator Spalgis epeus being the
Cheilomenus sexmaculata, Coccinella septem- dominant predator feeds efciently on the ovisacs,
punctata, Brumus suturalis and Hippodamia con- nymphs and adult mealybugs (Nagrare et al. 2011).
vergens were found as potential predators of Ph. Aenasius bambawalei Hayat, Anagyrus kamali
solenopsis (Arif et al. 2011b). Six species of coc- Moursi, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant),
cinellids, i.e. Scymnus coccivora Ayyar, Nephus Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens), Verticillium
regularis Sicard, Brumoides suturalis Fabricius, lecanii (Zimmermann) and Beauveria bassiana
Hippodamia variegata Goeze, Cheilomenes sex- (Vuillemin) are potential natural enemies of Ph.
maculata Fabricius and Coccinella septempunc- solenopsis (Joshi et al. 2010).
tata L., were associated with Ph. solenopsis in
and around Hisar, Haryana (Kedar et al. 2011). In
Tamil Nadu, the lycaenid predator Spalgis epeus 26.5.4 Other Mealybugs
was found associated with cotton mealybugs
(Suganthi et al. 2009). The Australian ladybird Cacoxenus perspicax Knab, Cheilomenes sex-
beetle Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant) maculata, Scymnus sp., Nephus regularis etc. are
was found to feed on colonies of Ph. solenopsis. present on N. viridis in different ecosystems that
C. montrouzieri, having a remarkable predatory feed on naturally occurring mealybug infestation.
potential, can be used for suppressing the popula- These predators and parasitoids have to be con-
tion of mealybug Ph. solenopsis (Nagrare et al. served and used for effective pest management so
2009; Ghafoor et al. 2011; Solangi et al. 2012). that the indiscriminate use of insecticides can be
avoided.
26.5.1.3 Pathogens
Cadavers of Ph. solenopsis infected with
Fusarium pallidoroseum (Cooke) Sacc were col- 26.6 Management
lected from Haryana and Punjab during 2007
2010. In the laboratory, F. pallidoroseum caused 26.6.1 Chemical Control
8095 % mortality of Ph. solenopsis (Monga
et al. 2010). The fungal pathogen Lecanicillium Organophosphates, such as chlorpyriphos and
(Verticillium) lecanii was found to be pathogenic profenophos, resulted in 100 % wipeout of
to Ph. solenopsis in Tamil Nadu (Banu et al. P. solenopsis population followed by triazophos
2009). Entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema 40 % emulsiable concentrate (EC) (98.99 %),
thermophilum was known to cause 83 % mortal- dimethoate 30 % EC (97.43 %), ethyl parathion
ity of mealybugs within 72 h after inoculation at 50 % EC (97.09 %), quinalphos 25 % EC
50 IJ/ml and 100 % mortality of mealybugs (96.26 %) and acephate 75 % soluble powder
within 48 h after inoculation at 500 IJs/ml (Kumar (SP) (96.26 %). Nitrosoguanidines, such as
and Sudershan 2011). thiodicarb (95.05 %), acetamiprid (86.06 %),
276 V.S. Nagrare et al.

thiomethoxam (78.21 %) and imidacloprid biological control of Ph. solenopsis in India


(74.00 %), also gave better control of mealybugs. (Gautam et al. 2009; Tanwar et al. 2011). It has
Neem oil 0.03 % EC (77.13 %) and a herbal played a very signicant role in keeping mealy-
product (Cal-MB) (72.00 %) comparatively per- bug population under control. Natural parasitiza-
formed well, whereas Verticillium lecanii (61.20 tion of more than 90 % at many locations in India
%), Beauveria bassiana (55.02 %) and the insect plays a key role in reducing the mealybug infesta-
growth regulator (IGR) Buprofezin 25 % suspen- tion in north and central India (Tanwar et al.
sion concentrate (SC) (64.32 %) showed moder- 2011; Pinjarkar et al. 2009). During 2008 in
ate mortality. Synthetic pyrethroid cypermethrin Haryana state, due to the activity of A. bambawa-
10 % EC (60.00 %) showed moderate mortality, lei, the mealybug population was reduced signi-
whereas fenevelerate 20 % EC (35.00 %) and cantly, and its parasitism went up to 64 % (Ram
deltamethrin 2.8 % EC (29.82 %) were least Pala and Saini 2010; Kumar et al. 2009b; Ram
effective (Nagrare et al. 2011). Kumar et al. et al. 2009). The extent of mealybug parasitiza-
(2009a) also stated that profenophos at 1,250 ml, tion by A. bambawalei in cotton was 25.7855.87
monocrotophos at 1,250 ml, chloropyriphos at % in Punjab (Dhawan et al. 2011; Sharma et al.
3,000 ml, quinalphos at 2,000 ml, acephate at 2010). In cotton elds of Gujarat, A. bambawalei
2,000 g, thiodicarb at 624 g and carbaryl WP at was observed on Ph. solenopsis with average
2,500 g/ha were found effective as spot sprays parasitization 37 % during AugustSeptember
against Ph. solenopsis. The insecticides acephate 2008 (Jhala et al. 2009). In Tamil Nadu, A. bam-
and chlorpyriphos proved effective in reducing bawalei was found causing up to 76 % parasitism
the population of Ph. solenopsis by 72.34 and on Ph. solenopsis (Amutha et al. 2009; Sankar
68.60 % respectively after three spray applica- et al. 2011). A. bambawalei was the dominant
tions (Kumar et al. 2012). Surulivelu et al. (2010) parasitoid on Ph. solenopsis in the cotton-growing
reported that imidacloprid, acetamiprid, thio- areas of Karnataka (Hanchinal et al. 2009). In
methoxam, dimethoate, trizaophos, pronil and Andhra Pradesh, parasitization by A. bambawalei
acephate applied at 37, 51, 65 and 98 days after was in the range of 826 % (Saroja 2009).
sowing had effectively controlled Pa. marginatus In Pakistan, A. bambawalei was found parasit-
population in south India. Most of the effective izing Ph. solenopsis up to 48 % (Arif et al.
organophosphates are extremely to moderately 2011a). In Pakistan, the parasitism ranged
toxic according to World Health Organization between 79 and 93 % in pesticides-free cotton
(WHO) classication and are detrimental to sev- elds, whereas the parasitism did not exceed 8 %
eral important natural enemies. Biorationals, (Solangi and Mahmood 2011) in pesticide-
such as neem oil, Verticillium lecanii, Beauveria applied cotton elds. A. bambawalei was reported
bassiana, buprofezin and slightly-to-moderately on Ph. solenopsis in Guangdong and Hainan
hazardous insecticides (according to WHO clas- Provinces, China (Chen Hua-Yan et al. 2010). In
sication), such as acephate and buprofezin, can the areas where the parasitoid is absent, culturing
be a part of mealybug management strategy in and release of A. bambawalei is advocated for the
light of ecological safety. suppression of Ph. solenopsis.
At Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth
(MPKV), Rahuri, the treatment with Metarhizium
26.6.2 Biological Control anisopliae at 2,000 g/ha was observed to be most
effective by recording a minimum of 87.46
26.6.2.1 Phenacoccus solenopsis mealybugs/5-cm shoot tip length/plant as com-
The parasitoid A. bambawalei is able to keep Ph. pared to 322.06 mealybugs/5-cm shoot tip in
solenopsis under check in India, Pakistan and untreated control. The higher seed cotton yield of
China. Its natural parasitization on Ph. solenopsis 1,521 kg/ha was obtained in a treatment with M.
could reach more than 90 % at many locations, and anisopliae at 2,000 g/ha as compared to 913 kg/ha
this is the most successful example of fortuitous in the untreated control (Kharbade et al. 2009).
26 Cotton 277

26.6.2.2 Paracoccus marginatus However, during peak boll formation stage,


Acerophagus papayae Noyes and Schauff was mealybugs can establish colonies but are initially
found to be highly effective against P. marginatus restricted to a few plants along the border rows,
on cotton in south India (Dharajothi et al. 2011). adjacent to the source of infestation and thus can
be effectively managed through early detection
26.6.2.3 Other Mealybugs and initiation of interventions to control early
Release of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri is recom- stages of infestation. If timely scouting and
mended for the control of other mealybugs such appropriate control measures are not initiated,
as M. hirsutus and F. virgata. cotton crop is likely to be severely damaged with
mealybugs. The package involves with

26.7 Sustainable Mealybug Regular monitoring for incidence of the


Management mealybugs is to be done.
Removal of the weeds that grow on eld
Detail packages of practices have been developed bunds, water channels and wastelands.
by Kranthi et al. (2011) available at http://www. Border crops like pigeon pea/sorghum/maize
cicr.org.in/PDF/Packageof practicesformanag- are to be raised around cotton elds and crop-
ingmealybugoncotton.pdf. Mealybug crawlers ping as a strip after ve to six rows of cotton may
spread through human interventions such as also prevent mealybug infestation and spread.
spraying, irrigations and frequent movement Removal of mealybug-infested cotton plants
through the infested area. Therefore, disturbing with more than one twig infested and destruc-
mealybug-affected plants should be avoided. It is tion by burning.
important to remember that young cotton plants Conservation and release of parasitoids A.
can overcome mealybugs and it is better not to bambawalei and A. papayae, which has a good
resort to chemical sprays on young plants that potential in the control of the Ph. solenopsis and
have slight infestation of the mealybugs in early Pa. marginatus, respectively, in cotton ecosystem.
vegetative stages of the crop. It has been observed The entomopathogenic fungi, Metarhizium
that the mealybugs were unable to establish colo- anisopliae, Beauveria bassiana, Verticillium
nies on the cotton crop during early vegetative lecanii and Fusarium pallidoroseum are to be
and peak vegetative stages. All over the country, tried against Ph. solenopsis.
several parasitoids, predominantly A. bambawalei, If more than 20 plants/acre exceed Grade II
and coccinellid predators are now found to keep (at least one stem completely colonized with
mealybug populations under control, thereby pre- mealybugs) by mealybug infestation, chemi-
venting spread and damage. Insecticides such as cal control measures may be initiated.
profenophos, chlorpyriphos and monocrotophos, The insect growth regulator buprofezin is
which are being commonly used for mealybug effective in control. Insecticides such as acephate
control, destroy the parasitoids and predators and can be used as soil application near the root zone.
can result in mealybug outbreaks. Therefore, Insecticide application should start rst on the
insecticide applications should be avoided until neighbouring plants and then as spot applica-
peak boll formation stage, so as to allow further tion near the root zone, base of the plant and
establishment of the parasitoid and predator other infested parts.
complex in the ecosystem. Eco-friendly insecti- Avoidance of application of hazardous insecti-
cides such as neem oil-based botanicals and cides such as methyl parathion (classied by
insect growth regulator buprofezin can be used, if the WHO as Class 1a: extremely hazardous),
necessary, in the initial stages so as to keep monocrotophos, dichlorvos, methomyl, triazo-
mealybugs under check while causing minimum phos and methyl demeton (Class 1b: highly
disturbance to the ecosystem. hazardous).
278 V.S. Nagrare et al.

References at Multan. Paper presented in 5th ICAC international


cotton advisory committee held at Lahore, Pakistan,
2325 February
Abbas G (2010) Taxonomy, ecobiology and management
Arif MJ, Gogi MD, Abid AM, Imran M, Shahid MR,
of mealybug on cotton in Pakistan. PhD thesis submit-
Husain S, Arshad M (2011b) Predatory potential of
ted to Faculty of Agriculture University of Agriculture
some native coccinellid predators against Phenacoccus
Faisalabad, Pakistan, 166p
solenopsis, Tinsely (Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera). Pak
Abbas G, Arif MJ, Saeed S (2005) Systematic status of
Entomol 33(2):97103
new species of genus Phenacoccus Cockerel
Ashfaq M, Noor AR, Mansoor S (2010) DNA-based char-
(Pseudococcidae), a serious pest of cotton Gossypium
acterization of an invasive mealybug (Hemiptera:
hirsutum L. in Pakistan. Pak Entomol 27:8384
Pseudococcidae) species damaging cotton in Pakistan.
Abbas G, Arif MJ, Saeed S, Karar H (2009) A new inva-
Appl Entomol Zool Tokyo 45(3):395404
sive species of genus Phenacoccus Cockerell attack-
Banu GJ, Surulivelu T, Balamurugan M, Amutha M,
ing cotton in Pakistan. Int J Agric Biol 11(1):5458
Gopalakrishnan N (2009) Natural occurrence of ento-
Abbas G, Arif MJ, Ashfaq M, Aslam M, Saeed S (2010)
mopathogenic fungi in mealybug, Phenacoccus sole-
The impact of some environmental factors on the
nopsis (Tinsley) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in
fecundity of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley
India. In: Proceedings of national symposium on Bt
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae): a serious pest of cotton
cotton; opportunities and prospectus, CICR, Nagpur,
and other crops. Pak J Agric Sci 47(4):321325
1719 November, 150p
Admin (2010) Exotic mealybug species a major new
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
pest in cotton. Published: February 12, 2010. http://
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
thebeatsheet.com.au/mealybugs/exoticmealybugspeci
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
esamajornewpestincotton/Accessed on 25 May 2010
ical distribution, host plants biology and economic
Afzal M, Rahman SU, Siddiqui MT (2009) Appearance
importance. Intercept Ltd, Andover, 686 pp
and management of a new devastating pest of cotton,
Banu GJ, Surulivelu T, Amutha M, Gopalakrishnan N
Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley in Pakistan. In:
(2010) Laboratory evaluation of insecticides and
Proceedings of Beltwide cotton conference, San
biopesticides against Phenococcus solenopsis and
Antonio, TX, pp 58
Paracoccus marginatus infesting cotton. J Biopest
Akintola AJ, Ande AT (2008) First record of Phenacoccus
3(1):343346
solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on
Bhosle BB, Bhede BV, Patange NR, Patait DD (2009)
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis in Nigeria. Agric J 3(1):13
Mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis) a new threat to
Amutha M, Dharajothi B, Surulivelu T, Gopalakrishnan N
cotton production in Marathwada region of
(2009) Natural parasitism on mealybug Phenococcus
Maharashtra. In: Proceedings of national symposium
solenopsis and Paracoccus marginatus at Coimbatore.
IPM strategies to combat emerging pests in the current
CICR Newsl 25:5
scenario of climate change, College of Horticulture
Anonymous (2008) Annual report (20082009) of Central
and Forestry Central Agricultural University, Pasighat,
Institute for Cotton Research, Regional Station,
Arunachal Pradesh, 2830 January, p 37
Coimbatore, India, 78p
Bisane KD, Khande DM, Aherkar SK (2010) Occurrence
Anonymous (2009) Mealybug species attacking Bt cotton
of mealybugs in Vidarbha region of Maharashtra.
is exotic? Crop Care 35(1):81. Available online at
Indian J Entomol 3:202204
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/mealybug-
Charleston K, Murray D (2010) Exotic mealybug
speciesthe-bt-cotton-killer-is-exotic-experts/490540/0
species a major new pest in cotton. Queensland
Accessed on 30 December 2010
Government. The Beat sheet. Accessed online on 30
Anonymous (2010) Mealybugs (non solenopsis). http://
Sept 2010 at http://thebeatsheet.com.au/pests/mealy-
www.cottoncrc.org.au/industry/Publications/Pests_
bugs/exotic-mealybug-species-a-major-new-pest-
and_Benecials/Cotton_Insect_Pest_and_Benecial_
in-cotton/
Guide/Pests_by_common_name/Mealybugs-Other
Chen Hua-Yan, Cao Run-Xin, Xu Zai-Fu (2010) First
Accessed on 30 December 2010
record of Aenasius bambawalei Hayat (Hymenoptera:
Anonymous (2012) http://www.crida.in/naip/comp4/
Encyrtidae), a parasitoid of the mealybug, Phenacoccus
images/PAD%202011-12%20August.pdf
solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from
Anonymous (2013a) http://portal.cbit.uq.edu.au/pestnet/
China. J Environ Entomol 32(2):280282
SummariesofMessages/Crops/Plantation crops/
David M, Charleston K (2010) Exotic mealybugs
Cotton/Mealybugs_cotton_Ethiopia.asp
conrmed on cotton in Central Queensland 2010.
Anonymous (2013b) http://tnaucottondatabase.word-
The Australian Cotton Grower 31(1):2526.
press.com/2012/03/13/tailedstripedmealybug/
Dharajothi B, Surulivelu T, Gopalakrishnan N, Manjula
Arif MI, Wazir S, Raq M, Ghaffar A, Mahmood R
TR (2010) Mealybugs in cotton and their manage-
(2011a) Incidence of Aenasius bambawalei Hayat on
ment. Central Institute for Cotton Research, Regional
mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley and its
Station, Coimbatore, Folder, 6p
hyperparasite, Promuscidea unfasciativentris Girault
26 Cotton 279

Dharajothi B, Surulivelu T, Sonai Rajan T, Valarmathi R Hanchinal G, Patil BV, Basavanagoud K, Nagangoud A,
(2011) First record on the establishment of the parasit- Biradar DP, Janagoudar BS (2011) Incidence of inva-
oid Acerophagus papayae Noyes & Schauff on sive mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley) on
Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de cotton. Karnataka J Agric Sci 24(2):143145
Willink in cotton. Karnataka J Agric Sci Hayat M (2009) Description of a new species of Aenasius
24(4):536537 Walker (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), parasitoid of the
Dhawan AK, Saini S (2009) First Record of Phenacoccus mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley
solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in India. Biosystematica
cotton in Punjab. J Insect Sci (Ludhiana) 3:2126
22(3):309310 Hodgson CJ, Abbas G, Arif MJ, Saeed S, Karar H (2008)
Dhawan AK, Singh J, Sidhu AS (1980) Maconellicoccus Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Sternorrhyncha:
sp. attacking arboreum cotton in Punjab. Sci Cult Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), an invasive mealybug
46:258 damaging cotton in Pakistan and India, with a discus-
Dhawan AK, Singh K, Aneja A, Saini S (2009) Distribution sion on seasonal morphological variation. Zootaxa
of mealy bug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley in cot- 1913:135
ton with relation to weather factors in South-Western IPPC (2010) Solenopsis mealybug in parts of central and
districts of Punjab. J Entomol Res 33(1):5963 northern Queensland. IPPC ofcial pest report, no.
Dhawan AK, Singh K, Saini S, Aneja A, Singh J (2011) AUS-36/1, AUS-36/1. FAO, Rome. https://www.ippc.
Parasitizing potential of parasitoid (Aenasius bam- int/ Accessed on 24 December 2011
bawalei) on mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis) in Jeyakumar P, Tanwar RK, Singh J, Singh S, Dhandapani A
cotton (Gossypium spp.) and weed plants. Indian (2009) Impact of weather factors on cotton mealy bug,
J Agric Sci 81(1):9799 Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley. In: Proceedings of
Dutt U (2007) Mealybug takes away glory of Bt cotton. national symposium IPM strategies to combat emerg-
Available at http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/ ing pests in the current scenario of climate change,
aug2007/2007-08-24-insdutt.asp College of Horticulture and Forestry Central
Fand BB, Gautam RD, Suroshe SS (2011) Suitability of Agricultural University, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh,
various stages of mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis 2829 January 2009, p 39
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) for development and Jeyarani S, Banu JG, Ramaraju K (2011) First record of
survival of the solitary endoparasitoid, Aenasius bam- natural occurrence of Cladosporium cladosporioides
bawalei (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Biocontrol Sci (Fresenius) de Vries and Beauveria bassiana (Bals.-
Tech 21(1/2):5155 Criv.) Vuill on two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus
Fuches TW, Stewart JW, Minzenmayer R, Rose M (1991) urticae Koch from India. J Entomol 8(3):274279
First record of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley in cul- Jhala RC, Bharpoda TM, Patel MG (2008) Phenacoccus
tivated cotton in the United States. Southwestern solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera Pseudococcidae), the
Entomol 16:215221 mealybug species recorded rst time on cotton and its
Gautam RD, Suroshe SS, Sudhida G, Saxena U, Fand BB, alternate host plants in Gujarat, India. Uttar Pradesh
Gupta T (2009) Fortuitous biological control of exotic J Zool 28(3):403406
mealy bug, Phenacoccus solenopsis a boon for Jhala RC, Solanki RF, Bharpoda TM, Patel MG (2009)
Indian growers. Ann Plant Prot Sci 17(2):473474 Occurrence of hymenopterous parasitoids, Aenasius
Ghafoor A, Saba I, Khan MS, Farooq HA, Zubaida Amjad bambawalei Hayat and Promuscidea unfaciativentris
I (2011) Predatory potential of Cryptolaemus mon- Girault on cotton mealybugs, Phenacoccus solenopsis
trouzieri for cotton mealybug under laboratory condi- Tinsley in Gujarat. Insect Environ 14(4):164165
tions. J Animal Plant Sci 21(1):9093 Joshi MD, Butani PG, Patel VN, Jeyakumar P (2010)
Granara de Willink MC (2003) New records and host Cotton mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley a
plants of Phenacoccus for Argentina (Hemiptera: review. Agric Rev 31(2):113119
Pseudococcidae). Revista de la Sociedad Entomolgica Kedar S, Saini RK, Pala R (2011) Record of coccinellid
Argentina 62:8082 predators associated with solenopsis mealybug,
Hanchinal SG, Patil BV, Bheemanna M, Hosamani AC Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera:
(2009) Incidence of mealybug Phenacoccus solenop- Pseudococcidae) from Haryana. J Entomol Res
sis Tinsley and its natural enemies on cotton in 35(3):245246
Karnataka. In: Proceedings of national symposium on Kharbade SB, Navale PA, Mehetre SS, Chandele AG
Bt-cotton: opportunities and prospectus, CICR, (2009) Evaluation of bio-pesticide against mealybugs,
Nagpur, 1719 November, 150p Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) on Cotton. In:
Hanchinal SG, Patil BV, Bheemanna M, Hosamani AC Proceedings of national symposium on Bt-cotton:
(2010) Population dynamics of mealybug, opportunities and prospectus, CICR, Nagpur, 1719
Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley and its natural ene- November, p 89
mies on Bt cotton. Karnataka J Agric Sci Khuhro SN, Kalroo AM, Mahmood R (2011) Survey and
23(1):137139 management of cotton mealybug Phenacoccus sole-
nopsis (Tinsley) on cotton and other host plants in
280 V.S. Nagrare et al.

different districts of Sindh (Pakistan) in 2010. In Pinjarkar DB, Vennila S, Ramamurthy VV, Kranthi KR,
World Cotton Research Conference-5 held at Mumbai Ghodki BS, Deshmukh AJ (2009) Diversity and abun-
from November 711 dance of Hymenopteran parasitoids of mealybugs in
Kranthi KR, Nagrare VS, Vennila S, Kranthi S (2011) rainfed cotton. In: Proceedings of the national sympo-
Package of practices for mealybug management. sium on Bt Cotton: opportunities and prospects held
ICAC Rec 29(1):1.4.11 at Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur,
Kumar HK, Sudershan G (2011) Bioefcacy of Indian 1719 November, pp 127128
strains of entomopathogenic nematodes against differ- Prishanthini M, Laxmi VM (2009) The Phenococcus
ent homopterans under laboratory conditions. Indian solenopsis. Department of Zoology, Eastern
J Nematol 41(2):197200 University, Sri Lanka. Available at http://www.daily-
Kumar R, Kranthi KR, Monga D, Jat SL (2009a) Natural news.lk/2009/07/01/fea30.asp Accessed on 31
parasitisation of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley October 2011
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on cotton by Aenasius Ram P, Saini RK (2010) Biological control of solenopsis
bambawalei Hayat (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). J Biol mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley on cotton:
Control 23(4):457460 a typical example of fortuitous biological control.
Kumar R, Pal V, Jat MC, Monga D, Jat SL (2009b) Studies J Biol Control 24(2):104109
on mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley on Ram P, Saini RK, Vijaya (2009) Preliminary studies on
transgenic cotton in North India. Indian J Entomol eld parasitization and biology of solenopsis mealy-
71(2):125129 bug parasitoid, Aenasius bambawalei Hayat
Kumar S, Kular JS, Dhaliwal LK (2011) Seasonal abun- (Encyrtidae: Hymenoptera). J Cotton Res Dev
dance of mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley) 23(2):313315
on Bt cotton in Punjab. Acta Phytopathologica et Sahito HA, Lanjar AG, Nahiyoon AA, Kajjak AS, Memon
Entomologica Hungarica 46(1):115127 SA, Bhugro M (2011) Seasonal Occurrence of
Kumar R, Nitharwal M, Chauhan R, Pal V, Kranthi KR Phenacoccus Solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera:
(2012) Evaluation of ecofriendly control methods for Pseudococcidae) and its natural enemies on different
management of mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis in varieties of cotton crop. Pak J Entomol Karachi
cotton. J Entomol 9(1):3240 26(1):1724
Misra CS (1920) Some pests of cotton in north Bihar. Saini RK, Ram P, Sharma SS, Rohilla HR (2009)
Report of Proceedings of 3rd entomological meeting, Mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley and its
Pusa, February 1919, Vol. 2, pp. 547561 survival in cotton ecosystem in Haryana In:
Monga D, Kumar R, Pal V, Jat MC (2009) Mealybug a Proceedings of national symposium on Bt-cotton:
new pest of cotton crop in Haryana: a survey. J Insect opportunities and prospectus, Central Institute of
Sci 22(1):100103 Cotton Research, Nagpur, 1719 November, 150p
Monga D, Kumhar KC, Kumar R (2010) Record of Sakthivel P, Karuppuchamy P, Kalyanasundaram M,
Fusarium pallidoroseum (Cooke) Sacc. on cotton Srinivasan T (2012) Host plants of invasive papaya
mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley. J Biol Mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Williams and
Control 24(4):366368 Granara de Willink) in Tamil Nadu. Madras Agric
Muhammad A (2007) Mealybug: cotton crops worst J 99(79):615619
catastrophe published by the Centre for Agro- Saminathan VR, Jayaraj S (2001) Evaluation of botanical
Informatics Research (CAIR), Pakistan. http://agroict. pesticides against the mealybug, Ferrisia virgata
org/adss/MealyBug_Report.aspx Accessed on 30 May Cockrell (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) on cotton.
2010 Madras Agric J 88(7/9):535537
Muralidharan CM, Badaya SN (2000) Mealybug Sankar C, Marimuthu R, Saravanan P, Jeyakumar P,
(Maconellicoccus hirsutus) outbreak on herbaceum Tanwar RK, Sathyakumar S, Bambawale OM,
cotton (Gossypium herbaceum) in Wagad cotton belt Ramamurthy VV, Anupam B (2011) Predators and
of Kachch. Indian J Agric Sci 70:705706 parasitoids of cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus solenop-
Nagrare VS, Kranthi S, Biradar VK, Zade NN, Sangode V, sis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in
Kakde G, Shukla RM, Shivare D, Khadi BM, Kranthi Perambalur district of Tamil Nadu. J Biol Control
KR (2009) Widespread infestation of the exotic mealy- 25(3):242245
bug species, Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) Saroja DGM (2009) Incidence of mealybug Phenacoccus
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on cotton in India. Bull solenopsis Tinsley and its parasitoids on cotton. In:
Entomol Res 99(5):537541 Proceedings of national symposium IPM strategies to
Nagrare VS, Kranthi S, Kumar R, Dharajothi B, Amutha combat emerging pests in the current scenario of cli-
M, Deshmukh AJ, Bisane KD, Kranthi KR (2011) mate change, College of Horticulture and Forestry
Compendium of cotton mealybugs, 52 p, CICR, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, Arunachal
Nagpur Pradesh, 2830 January, p 42
Nagrare VS, Deshmukh AJ, Nandeshwar SB, Nandeshwar Sharma S, Virk JS, Rabinde K, Naveen A, Mahal MS
YV, Kranthi S (2012) Three minor pest recorded on (2010) Monitoring studies on natural parasitization of
cotton in Central India. CICR Newsl 27(4):6 cotton mealy bug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley, by
26 Cotton 281

parasitoid, Aenasius bambawalei Hayat in Punjab. bulletin 22. National Centre for Integrated Pest
Indian J Ecol 37(2):226228 Management, New Delhi, 22p
Shylesha AN, Joshi S (2012) Occurrence of Madeira Tanwar RK, Jeyakumar P, Singh A, Jafri AA, Bambawale
mealybug Phenacoccus madeirensis Green OM (2011) Survey for cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus
(Hemiptera:Pseudococcidae) on cotton in India and solenopsis (Tinsley) and its natural enemies. J Environ
record of associated parasitoids. J Biol Control Biol 32(3):381384
26(3):272273 Thomas A, Ramamurthy VV (2011) On the diagnostics of
Silva CAD (2012) Occurrence of new species of mealy- mealybug occurring on cotton, spherical mealybug
bug on cotton elds in the States of Bahia and Paraba, Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) (Hemiptera:
Brazil. Bragantia Campinas 71(4):467470 Pseudococcidae). Munis Entomol Zool 6(1):455459
Solangi GS, Mahmood R (2011) Biology, host specicity Thomas A, Chaudhary B, Singh J, Ramamurthy VV
and population trends of Aenasius bambawalei Hayat (2008) Preliminary observations on the non-target
and its role in controlling mealy bug Phencoccus sole- insect communities in Bt cotton. Indian J Entomol
nopsis Tinsley at Tandojam Sindh. Paper presented in 70(4):400402
5th ICAC international cotton advisory committee Torres CS, Oliveira MD, Torres JB (2013) Host selection
held at Lahore, Pakistan, 2325 February and establishment of striped mealybug, Ferrisia vir-
Solangi GS, Lohar MK, Abro GH, Buriro AS (2012) gata, on cotton cultivars. Phytoparasitica 41(1):3140
Biology and release of exotic predator Cryptolaemus Vennila S, Deshmukh AJ, Pinjarkar D, Agarwal M,
montrouzieri Mulsant on mealybug Phenacoccus sole- Ramamurthy VV, Joshi S, Kranthi KR, Bambawale
nopsis Tinsley at Tandojam. Sarhad J Agric OM (2010a) Biology of the mealybug, Phenacoccus
28(3):429435 solenopsis on cotton in the laboratory. J Insect Sci
Suganthi A, Kalyanasundaram M, Mahalaksmi V (2009) 10:115119
A buttery predator on cotton mealy bugs. Online edi- Vennila S, Ramamurthy VV, Deshmukh AJ, Pinjarkar DB,
tion of Indias National Newspaper The Hindu Agarwal M, Pagar PC, Prasad YG, Prabhakar M,
Thursday, November 12 Kranthi KR, Bambawale OM (2010b) A treatise on
Suresh S (2008) Cotton mealybug complex. In Proceedings mealybugs of Central Indian cotton production sys-
of the National Consultation on Mealybug tem, Technical bulletin no 24. National Centre for
Management. Central Institute for cotton Research, Integrated Pest Management, New Delhi, 39p
2829 January, Nagpur, India, pp 1517 Wang YP, Wu SA, Zhang RZ (2009) Pest risk analysis of
Suresh S, Kavitha PC (2008a) New records of Coccoidea a new invasive pest Phenacoccus solenopsis, to China.
in India. In: Branco M, Franco JC, Hodgson CJ (eds) (in Chinese; Summary in English). Chin Bull Entomol
Proceedings of the XI international symposium on 46(1):101106
scale insect studies, Oeiras, Portugal, 2427 September Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of Southern Asia. The
2007. ISA Press, Lisbon, p 322 natural history museum, London, and Southdene.
Suresh S, Kavitha PC (2008b) Seasonal incidence of eco- SDN BHD, Kuala Lumpur, 896 pp
nomically important coccid pests in Tamil Nadu. 285 Wu SA, Zhang RZ (2009) A new invasive pest,
291 In: Branco M, Franco JC, Hodgson CJ (eds) Phenacoccus solenopsis threatening seriously to cot-
Proceedings of the XI international symposium on ton production. Chin Bull Entomol 46(1):159162
scale insect studies, Oeiras, Portugal, 2427 September Zaka SM, Saeed S, Bukhari SA, Baksh E (2006)
2007. ISA Press, Lisbon, 322 p Mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis (Homoptera:
Suresh S, Jothimani R, Sivasubrmanian P, Karuppuchamy Pseudococcidae): a novel pest of cotton in Pakistan.
P, Samiyappan R, Jonathan EI (2010) Invasive mealy- In: Proceedings of 34th Pakistan (SAARC) countries
bugs of Tamil Nadu and their management. Karnataka science conference, University of Veterinary and
J Agric Sci 23(1):69 Animal Sciences, 810 February 2006. Lahore,
Surulivelu T, Sonai Rajan T, Dharajothi B (2010) Pakistan, p 32
Insecticidal inuences on papaya mealybug Zhang R, Wang Y, Yalan L (2010) Discovery of a new
(Paracoccus marginatus) in cotton. CICR Newsl invasive mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley
6(1):7 (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in China. In: Potential
Tanwar RK, Jeyakumar P, Vennila S (2010) Papaya invasive pests workshop held at Miami, Florida, 1014
mealybug and its management strategies, Technical October 2010, 71p
Jute and Allied Fibre Crops
27
M. Mani and S. Satpathy

27.1 Mealybug Species sorrel (Hibiscus sabdariffa) have been reported


to be damaged by mealybugs (Pollard 1995).
Mealybugs are injurious to bre crops such as Mealybug infestation was also observed on jute
jute (Corchorus capsularis and Corchorus olito- in Dacca. In Bangladesh, F. virgata is known as a
rius), mesta (Hibiscus sabdariffa and Hibiscus pest of jute (Corchorus olitorius), causing the
cannabinus), roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa var. formation of barky fibre. Nipaecoccus viridis
altissima), sorrel (Hibiscus sabdariffa) and is also known to infest Corchorus capsularis
kapok/silk cotton (Ceiba pentandra). (white jute) (http://www.plantwise.org/
In India, the mealybug species Ferrsia virgata KnowledgeBank/Datasheet.aspx?dsid=36335.).
(Cockerell), Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead), Kapok (Ceiba pentandra) is a large deciduous
Pseuducoccus lamentous (Cockerell) and tree, best known for the bre produced by its fruit
Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) are known to (Table 27.1).
attack jute. Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) Rastrococcus iceryoides is a serious pest of
and Ph. solenopsis are also reported on mesta Kapok trees, in Tanganyika. No reports followed
(Kundu et al. 1959; Ghose 1961; Tripathy and a record of introduction of C. montrouzieri in
Ram 1971; David and Ananthakrishnan 2004; Tanganyika (Ritchie 1935). Planococcus lilaci-
Satpathy et al. 2009). Maconellicoccus hirsutus nus (Cockerell), Paracoccus marginatus Williams
was reported on H. cannabinus and H. sabdariffa and Granara de Willink Maconellicoccus hirsu-
in Egypt (Hall 1921). Paracoccus marginatus has tus, Rastrococcus iceryoides and Planococcoides
been reported on silk cotton in south India njalensis (Laing) are also known to infest attack
(Tanwar et al. 2010). In the Caribbean islands, Kapok trees. Rastrococcus invadens was also
recorded on Ficus sp. in Sri Lanka (Galanihe and
Watson 2012).

27.2 Damage
M. Mani (*)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India The mealybug infestation in India went up to
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in 80 % in case of jute with average intensity of
S. Satpathy 23 in 04 scale. The plant infestation in mesta
Central Research Institute for Jute and Allied Fibres, was 60 % with average intensity of 4 in the
Barrackpore, Kolkata 700120, India 04 scale.
e-mail: satpathy.iivr@gmail.com

Springer India 2016 283


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_27
284 M. Mani and S. Satpathy

Mealybugs on roselle plant

P. marginatus on Silk cotton

Table 27.1 List of mealybugs recorded on Kapok in dif- In M. hirsutus-infested roselle (Hibiscus sab-
ferent countries
dariffa var. altissima) plants, the number of pods
Mealybug Species Country Reference averaged 13.43/plant, the number of seeds 10.57/
Deltococcus tafaensis Ghana Ben-Dov pod and the percentage germination of the seed
(Strickland) (1994)
78.61, as compared with 24.40 pods/plant, 27.83
Maconellicoccus hirsutus Thailand Williams
seeds/pod and 87.63 % germination in uninfested
(Green) (2004)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Ben-Dov
plants (Ghose 1971). Maconellicoccus hirsutus is
(1994) emerging to be a major pest of mesta, particularly
Planococcus indicus India, Ben-Dov in the peninsular India. It causes bunchy top
(Avasthy & Shafee) China (1994) which is a serious malady of mesta crop. The
Planococcoides Ben-Dov bre crops Hibiscus sabdariffa var. altissima
nijalensis (Laing) (1994) (roselle), H. Cannabinus and Boehemeria nivea
Parcoccua marginatus India Mani et al have been reported to be the major hosts of
Williams and Granara de (2012)
Willink mealybugs in West Bengal, India, and Bangladesh
Planococcus lilacinus Indonesia Williams (Ghose 1972a; Singh and Ghosh 1970). The
(Cockrell) (2004) reduction in bre yield of roselle is to the extent
Rasrococcus iceryoides Thailand Williams of 21.4 % (Ghose 1971) to 40 % (Raju et al.
(Green) (2004) 1988). The salivary toxin injected during feeding
27 Jute and Allied Fibre Crops 285

causes characteristics distortion of leaves, short- against M. hirsutus because of its habit of feeding
ening if internodes and bushy top symptom in inaccessible parts and waxy covering of the
(Singh and Ghosh 1970; Ghose 1972b; Williams body (Williams 1996). Any pesticide used against
1996). Infestation by mealybug, M. hirsutus, M. hirsutus should be carefully selected to avoid
reduces the linear growth of the stem and petiole injury to its natural enemies, since they are likely
and markedly reduces the size, distort the mesta to be important in helping to keep populations at
leaves, causing bunchy top symptoms (Dutta low levels in the long term. The farmers used
et al. 1951), causing 1520 % reduction in bre wide array of insecticides without any apprecia-
yield (Das and Singh 1986). Its infestation causes ble result against Ph. solenopsis. On the other
damage to both bre and seed crop. Ferrisia vir- hand, insecticide spray suppressed the natural
gata has also been reported to induce stiffness of enemy activity, resulting in build-up of the
the ramie plants which makes the extraction of mealybug population (Satpathy et al. 2009).
bres by machine very difcult. In Bangladesh, it Cryptolaemus montrouzieri is a very good candi-
caused 6570 % infestation of mesta plants (Jalil date for the biological control of M. hirsutus and
and Kabir 1971). There was an outbreak of Ph. F. virgata, and this predator can be utilised for the
solenopsis in jute and mesta in West Bengal. The suppression of mealybugs. Acerophagus papayae
plant infestation in jute (cv. JRO524) was 6080 can be utilised for the control of P. marginatus
% with an average intensity of 23 in 04 scale, and so also Aenasius bombavale for Ph. solenop-
while it was 60 % and 40 %, respectively, in the sis in bre crops.
case of mesta (cv Local). Analysis of weather
factors indicated that the warm and dry weather
condition during summer might be the predispos- References
ing factor for the mealy outbreak in jute and
mesta (Satpathy et al. 2009). Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
27.3 Natural Enemies importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
Das LK, Singh B (1986) Economic control of
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) infesting mesta.
The coccinellid predators Brumoides suturalis
Indian J Agric Sci 56(5):373375
(F.) and Scymnus nubilus (Muls.) and the encyr- David BV, Ananthakrishnan TN (2004) General and
tid parasite Anagyrus sp. are the important natu- applied entomology. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing,
ral enemies on M. hirsutus. Six species of ants New Delhi, 1184p
Dutta N, Mukherjee PK, Gupta NS (1951) Preliminary
were found attending M. hirsutus in West Bengal,
observations on the incidence of Phenococcus hirsu-
India (Ghose 1970a). In Andhra Pradesh, India, tus Gr. and its effect on the growth of H. subdariffa
Spalgis epeus (Westwood), Hyperaspis maindroni Lin.var. altissima Hort. India. Indian J Agric Sci
Sicard, Autoba silicula Swinhoe and 21:231237
Galanihe LD, Watson GW (2012) Identication of
Brinckochrysa scelestes Banks were found prey-
Rastrococcus rubellus Williams (Hemiptera:
ing on eggs and nymphs of M. hirsutus, an impor- Pseudococcidae) on mango: a new record to Sri Lanka.
tant pest of kenaf (mesta) (Rao et al. 1984). Tropical Agric Res Ext 15(2):710
Ghose SK (1961) Studies on some coccids of economic
importance of West Bengal, India. Indian Agric
5:5778
27.4 Management Ghose SK (1970a) Predators, parasites and attending ants
of the mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green)
Sprays of methyl demeton at 0.2 % were found (Pseudococcidae, Hemiptera). Plant Protect Bull India
22(3):2230
highly effective in controlling populations of M.
Ghose SK (1970b) Chemical control of the mealybug,
hirsutus on roselle Hibiscus sabdariffa (Ghose Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) (Pseudococcidae,
1970b). The chemicals have limited effectiveness Hemiptera). Plant Protect Bull India 22(3):1721
286 M. Mani and S. Satpathy

Ghose SK (1971) Assessment of loss in yield of seeds of Rao PRM, Kanakaraju A, Apparao RV, Azam KM (1984)
roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L. var. altissima Wester) Predators on mealy bug of mesta. Q Newsl FAO Asia
due to the mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus Pac Plant Protect Commission 27(4):12
(Green) (Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera). Indian J Agric Ritchie AH (1935) Report of the entomologist. Tanganyika
Sci 41(4):360362 Department of Agriculture Report for 1934, pp 7383
Ghose SK (1972a) Biology of the mealybug Satpathy S, Gotyal BS, Ramasubramanian T,
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) (Pseudococcidae, Bhattacharyya SK, Laha SK (2009) Mealybug infesta-
Hemiptera). Indian Agric 16(4):232332 tion in jute and mesta crop a case study. In: National
Ghose SK (1972b) Morpho-histological changes in some symposium on climate change, plant protection, and
economic plants due to the infestation of mealy bug, food security interface, West Bengal, Kalyani, 1719
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (green) (Hemiptera: December 2009, p 78
Pseudococcidae). Indian J Agric Sci 42(4):329334 Singh MP, Ghosh SN (1970) Studies on Maconellicoccus
Hall WJ (1921) The Hibiscus mealybug (Phenacoccus (Phenococcus) hirsutus Gr. causing bunchy top in
hirsutus Green). Bull Minis Agric Egypt 17:128 mesta. Indian J Sci Indus 4(2):99105
Jalil AFMA, Kabir AKMF (1971) Some studies on Tanwar RK, Jeyakumar P, Vennila S (2010) Papaya
Pseudococcus virgatus Ckll. infesting Mesta and mealybug and its management strategies. Technical
Kenaf in East Pakistan. Agric Pak 22(2):237240 Bulletin 22, National Centre for Integrated Pest
Kundu BC, Basak KC, Sirkar PB (1959) Jute in India- a Management, New Delhi, 22p
monograph. Indian Central Jute Committee, Calcutta, Tripathy RL, Ram S (1971) A review of entomological
pp 159170 researches on Jute, Mesta. Sunnhemp and allied
Mani M, Shivaraju C, Sylesha AN (2012) Paracoccus bres. ICAR technical bulletin no. 36. New Delhi:
marginatus, an invasive mealybug of papaya and its Indian Council of Agricultural Research
biological control. J Biol Control 26(3):201216 Williams DJ (1996) A brief account of pink hibiscus
Pollard GV (1995) Pink hibiscus mealy bug in the mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera,
Caribbean. CARAPHIN News 12:12 Pseudococcidae), a pest of agriculture and horticulture
Raju AK, Rao PRM, Apparao RV, Reddy AS, Rao KKP with description of two related species from Southern
(1988) Note on estimation of losses in yield of mesta Asia. Bull Ento Res 86:617628
due to mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green. Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Jute Dev J 8(1):3435 Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Sugarcane
28
R. Jayanthi, J. Srikanth, and S.N. Sushil

28.1 Mealybug Species chari was reported for the rst time in Cuba along
with observations on three other species, includ-
Mealybugs are widespread throughout the ing S. sacchari (Williams et al. 2001).
sugarcane-growing tracts of the world but all of Kiritshenkella sacchari (Fig. 28.1bc) and
them seldom attained major pest status (Tohamy Antonina graminis are also commonly encoun-
et al. 2008). According to Williams (1970), 30 tered in Tamil Nadu, India. The incidence pattern
species of mealybugs are known to attack sugar- of these three species revealed that K. sacchari
cane in different regions of the world (Table has the potential to emerge as an important pest,
28.1). Nine species of mealybugs are known to especially under drought conditions. While
occur in India. A detailed compendium on the Dysmicoccus carens (Fig. 28.1de) was observed
Indian species of sugarcane mealybugs with infesting the foliage of sugarcane hybrids,
respect to their biology, factors inuencing their Pseudococcus sp. was observed on sugarcane
buildup, crop damage, and management aspects rootlets (Jayanthi et al. 1995). Pseudococcus sac-
has been documented by Jayanthi (1986). The charicola was reported from south Andaman on
pink mealybug Saccharicoccus sacchari sugarcane leaves (Veenakumari and Mohanraj
(Fig. 28.1a) is the most ubiquitous species in 1995). Dysmicoccus carens was recorded in
India. Outside India, S. sacchari on sugarcane Andhra Pradesh by Rao et al. (2008).
was reported from Alexandria and Egypt (Hafez
and Salama 1969; Mesbah et al. 1976). It may be
native to Eastern Africa but was also reported to 28.2 Damage
occur in Formosa, Malaysia, Philippines, Java,
Hawaii, Samoa, Australia, Syria, Egypt, Madeira, Nymphs and adults suck the sap from leaves,
Argentina, Peru, British Guiana, Mexico, nodes, and internodes of canes. Severe infesta-
Caribbean Islands, Mauritius, South Africa and tion results in yellowing of leaves, stunting of
East Africa (Clausen 1978). Kiritshenkella sac- canes and poor germination in the case of S. sac-
chari attack.
R. Jayanthi (*) J. Srikanth Loss of sap may kill the young shoots in the
ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, case of Ps. saccharicola or may result in a marked
Coimbatore 641007, India setback in cane growth, ultimately leading to
e-mail: jayajanani21@yahoo.com total drying of the crop as evident in instances of
S.N. Sushil Ph. saccharifolii infestation. The stalks on which
ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, the mealybug colonies have fed and perished can
Lucknow 226002, India

Springer India 2016 287


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_28
288 R. Jayanthi et al.

Table 28.1 List of mealybugs recorded on sugarcane in different regions of the world
Mealybug species Region/Country Reference
Antonina graminis (Maskell) Williams (1970)
Hawaii Pemberton (1938)
India Ahmad (1942)
Sri Lanka Kumarasinghe (2003)
Texas Riherd (1950)
Cannococcus ikshu Williams and Papua New Guinea Ben-Dov (1994)
Watson
Chorizococcus rostellum (Lobdell) Williams (1970)
Chorizococcus talipikanus Williams Papua New Guinea Ben-Dov (1994)
and Watson
Dysmicoccus boninsis (Kuwana) Indonesia and Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) India Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus carens sp.n. India Williams (1970)
Dysmicoccus cryptus (Hempel) Williams (1970)
Dysmicoccus trispinosus (Hall) Williams (1970)
Eumyrmococcus smithii Silvestri China and Japan Williams (2004)
Exallomochlus hispidus (Morrison) Indonesia, Java and Malaysia Williams (2004)
Formicococcus lingnani (Ferris) Indonesia Williams (2004)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) Williams (1970)
Heliococcus summervillei Brookes Australia and Pakistan Ben-Dov (1994)
Kiritshenkella sacchari (Green) [= Cuba Williams et al. (2001)
Ripersia sacchari (Green)] India Ayyar (1919)
Pakistan Ali (1995)
Bangladesh, Burma, India, and Williams (2004)
Pakistan
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) Williams (1970)
Madagasia cincinnata sp.n. Williams (1970)
Mizococcus sacchari Takahashi Williams (1970)
Taiwan Williams (2004)
Neoripersia ogasawarensis (Kuwana) Ogasawara Islands Ben-Dov (1994)
Paracoccus eastopi Williams Nigeria Williams (1970); Williams (2004)
Paracoccus spinulosus (De Lotto) Williams (1970)
Uganda Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus hargreavesi (Laing) Williams (1970)
Ethiopia Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus parvus Morrison Ethiopian, Neotropical, and Pacic Ben-Dov (1994)
region
Phenacoccus saccharifolii (Green) Williams (1970)
India Green (1908), Isaac and Misra
(1933)
India, Nepal, and Pakistan Williams (2004)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Williams (1970)
Planococcoides lindingeri Egypt and Israel Ben-Dov (1994)
(Bodenheimer)
Planococcoides lingnani (Ferris) China Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Trinidad Francis et al. (2012)
(continued)
28 Sugarcane 289

Table 28.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Region/Country Reference
Planococcus variabilis (Hall) Williams (1970)
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Williams (1970)
Tozzetti)
Pseudococcus saccharicola Takahashi Australian and Oriental region Ben-Dov (1994)
British Virgin Islands Wheeler et al. (2010)
India Ahmad (1942)
Pruthi and Rao (1942)
Bangladesh Williams (2004)
Rhizoecus albus James Williams (1970)
Rhizoecus epicopus (Williams) Barbados Ben-Dov (1994), Williams (1970)
Saccharicoccus sacchari (Cockerell) Australia Mungomery (1932)
Barbados Bovell (1921)
British Guiana Bodkin (1913)
Costa Rica Anonymous (1912)
Cuba Hutson (1918)
Egypt Hall (1922)
India Isaac and Misra (1933)
Jamaica Gowdey (1926)
Madagascar Frappa (1935)
Mexico Van Zwaluwenburg (1926)
Porto Rico Van Dine (1913)
Samoa Swezey (1924)
South Africa Dick (1953)
Uganda Hancock (1926)
Williams (1970)
India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Sri Williams (2004)
Lanka, and Malaysia
Trionymus ceres Williams India and Pakistan Williams (1970), Williams (2004)
Trionymus internodii (Hall) Egypt and Israel Williams (1970)
Trionymus pygmaeus De Lotto Asia Williams (1970)
Trionymus radicicola (Morrison) Columbia and Jamaica Ben-Dov (1994), Williams (1970)

be recognized by residues of wax, honeydew, and juice signicantly in cv. Co 1148 (Atiqui and
sooty mold that persist for months (Jayanthi Murad 1992).
1986.
Severe infestation of S. saccchari in canes
reduced sucrose content by 24.1 % and brix by 28.3 Factors Inuencing Buildup
16.2 % (Kalra and Sidhu 1964). Varietal reaction
in terms of infestation levels and yield and qual- Agroclimatic conditions and crop management
ity parameters due to S. sacchari infestation have factors are known to have impact on the mealy-
been elucidated by Jayanthi (1991). In Uttar bug abundance, both positively and negatively.
Pradesh, India, S. sacchari infestation reduced While dry conditions generally favor mealybugs,
sugar brix, sucrose, purity, and available sugar rainfall exerts a negative inuence, apparently by
content by 10.64, 16.44, 6.14, and 12.92 %, dislodging colonies in detrashed crop and pro-
respectively but did not affect the volume of cane moting the growth of entomopathogenic fungi.
290 R. Jayanthi et al.

Fig. 28.1 Mealybugs of sugarcane

However, Ph. saccharifolii was observed to relation with incidence in Andhra Pradesh, India.
multiply rapidly with the onset of monsoon Water stress conditions, small dry spells,
(Mohammad Ali 1962). In general, conditions neglected ratoons and repeated ratooning
that are least favorable for the vegetative growth enhanced infestation (Rao et al. 2009). Mealybug
of the sugarcane plant appear to be most favor- abundance is also known to be inuenced by
able for the increase of S. sacchari. Reduction in plant factors such as the nature of leaf sheath.
S. sacchari populations was observed with Varieties with loose clasping leaf sheath harbor
enhanced levels of irrigation in drip-irrigated higher levels of mealybug populations than those
plots (Parsana et al. 1994). Ratoons were not sus- with tight clasping leaf sheath. Self-stripping
ceptible as a general rule; on the other hand, the varieties are less prone to mealybug infestation.
plant crop of some commercial hybrids was more According to Jayanthi (1991) and Jayanthi et al.
susceptible than the ratoon counterparts (Jayanthi (1994), stem hardness was not found to inuence
1991). Saccharicoccus sacchari outbreak colonization by S. sacchari; some biochemical
occurred in years of moderate temperature during parameters were related to infestation by S. sac-
MarchApril, and temperature had a positive cor- chari. Ants, generally found associated with
28 Sugarcane 291

mealybugs, have been shown to interfere with Mealybug-tolerant clones were identied in a
predator activity (Srikanth et al. 2001), thereby series of other screening studies with clones and
possibly enhancing the mealybug density. standard varieties at different locations (Abdullah
2009; Abdullah et al. 2006a, b, 2010). In studies
with 43 germplasms against S. sacchari in Egypt,
28.4 Varietal Susceptibility C 46-117, Co 237, Co 290, Co 997, CP 31-294,
CP 34-38 and CP 52-43 were classied as resis-
No truly resistant varieties are available because tant (Solouma 2002). The varieties Giza 96/74
mealybugs are capable of infesting any sugarcane and Ph 8013 were less susceptible to S. sacchari
genotype. However, higher levels of infestation based on percent infested internodes and number
are often observed in genotypes with loose clasp- of mealybugs per stalk (Tohamy et al. 2008).
ing leaf sheath. The commercial varieties CoC
671 and CoA 7601 with tight clasping leaf sheath
always registered low incidence of S. sacchari 28.5 Natural Enemies
(Sithanantham 1973; Mehta et al. 1981). The
genotypes Co 740, Co 6806, Co 8014, CoC 671, About 16 parasitoids, 13 predators and the
and CoA 7601 showed tolerance to S. sacchari entomopathogenic fungus Aspergillus parasiti-
(Anonymous 1992). In Assam, the varieties cus were recorded in different parts of India
CoBLN 9101, 9102, 9103, Co 6806, C0Jor-1, (Jayanthi 1986). The encyrtid Anagyrus punct-
C0Jor-2 and Co 740 were relatively resistant to S. ulatus Agarwal was found to be the most impor-
sacchari (Borah and Dutta 1995). Although none tant parasitoid in regulating the pest population
of the 24 sugarcane varieties screened were free in Gujarat; the parasitoid showed positive
from nymphs of S. sacchari, lowest densities of results in augmentative studies (Kapadia et al.
nymphs/internode were found on CoN 84136 and 1995). The activity of the parasitoid was noticed
CcN 84134, while the highest were on Co 87004 to be highest in July and lowest during
(Parsana et al. 1995). Similarly, none of the 17 NovemberDecember (Parsana et al. 1996). In
genotypes evaluated against borers and sucking Maharashtra, Chilocorus nigrita (F.) was found
pests in Maharashtra, India, were found to be attacking S. sacchari (Dorge et al. 1972). In
resistant to S. sacchari (Hole et al. 2009). The Uttar Pradesh, six parasitoids and four preda-
sugarcane cultivars Q 63 and Co 6501, catego- tors, including Batrachedra sp. near psilopa
rized as being lightly infested by S. sacchari and Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Momphidae), were
scale, showed higher quantities of phenols at har- reported on S. sacchari (Nigam 1983; Singh
vest compared to the other heavily infested culti- et al. 1997). The cecidomyiid predator
vars, namely Co 671, Co 6806, Co 740, and G Dicrodiplosis sp. was also recorded on S. sac-
229 (Jayanthi and Goud 2001). Differential bio- chari in Andhra Pradesh (Reddy and Aziz
logical parameters of D. carens observed on the 2000). The natural enemies of S. sacchari found
sugarcane genotypes Co 740, Co 7704, C 6806, in the neighboring Sri Lanka were listed by
CoC 671, and Co 6907 under laboratory condi- Rajendra (1974). Of these, the predatory droso-
tions indicated differential susceptibility of the philid Gitonides (Gitona) perspicax Knab, lar-
genotypes to the mealybug (Razak et al. 1994). vae of the nitidulid Carpophilus marginellus
Nine promising clones and a commercial cultivar Motsch. and ve encyrtid parasitoids of a genus
were considered susceptible to S. sacchari in near to Microterys were important in control-
Bangladesh. Lower infestation levels in clones I ling mealybug populations in the eld. The rat
155-91 and I 209-91 indicated that these might be Millardia meltada meltada gnawed through the
chosen as promising material to develop com- lower dry leaf sheaths and devoured the mealy-
mercial cultivars (Taleb and Rahman 2004). bugs at the nodes (Rajendra 1974).
292 R. Jayanthi et al.

28.6 Management 1997); fenvalerate 0.4 % and malathion 10 % as


dust formulation signicantly reduced S. sac-
Mealybugs assume pest status sporadically, chari populations (Deka et al. 1999); spraying
apparently under localized favorable conditions, of phosphamidon (0.05 %) or dimethoate (0.05
some of which are elucidated above. Unlike other %) during the seventh and eighth months of
sucking pests such as woolly aphid, scale or crop growth was effective against S. sacchari
pyrilla, outbreaks of mealybugs have rarely been (Thirumurugan et al. 2002). High mortality of
encountered in proportions that warranted sys- S. sacchari was observed when infested plants
tematic and organized control measures. were treated with acephate (95.00 %) and acet-
However, control methods have been evaluated amiprid (96.66 %) (Tewari and Yadav 2005).
under specic situations which when practiced as The plant product PLEXIN, a mixture of plant
a package (Srikanth et al. 2012) would be useful oils and tobacco decoction, at 1 % concentra-
in containing them. tion was superior to other lower concentrations
in controlling the sucking pests of sugarcane,
including mealybugs (Chelvi and Kandasamy
28.6.1 Cultural Control 2010). In Sri Lanka, dipping cane setts in 0.1 %
gamma benzene hexachloride (BHC) before
Routine adoption of certain cultural practices planting failed to control S. sacchari (Rajendra
such as avoidance of overdoses of nitrogenous 1974). Among six insecticides, methomyl 90 %
fertilizers, planting of uninfested setts, clean soluble powder (SP) was effective in reducing
cultivation, removal of known alternative hosts the joints per stalk infested by S. sacchari in
near sugarcane elds and detrashing in severely Egypt (Ebieda et al. 1998). Malathion applied
infested grown-up crop ensures reduction in 30 days after the release of Trichogramma eva-
mealybug proliferation and perpetuation (David nescens (Westwood) effectively controlled both
et al. 1986). In Egypt, increasing the row spac- Chilo agamemnon and S. sacchari and reduced
ing had resulted in a decrease in the population the incidence of infested joints and dead tops
of S. sacchari. Ratoon crops harbored greater (Khewa et al. 2006).
levels of mealybug infestation. Burning of dry
leaves left in the eld integrated with ood irri-
gation after harvesting sugarcane signicantly 28.6.3 Biological Control
reduced percent infested internodes and num-
ber of mealybugs per plant (Tohamy et al. Two releases of the predator Chrysopa scelestis
2008). Banks at 10,000 eggs/ha at a 15-day interval
resulted in the highest predation rates of S. sac-
chari (Chelvi and Kandasamy 2009).
28.6.2 Chemical Control Augmentation and/or introduction of natural
enemies, particularly the predatory coccinellid
Application of 0.050.1 % ethyl parathion Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant, were
(Kalra and Sidhu 1964), malathion (Singh and resorted to in several countries for the control of
Avasthy 1973) and phosphamidon at 3 kg a.i./ S. sacchari with positive and negative results. It
ha (Shah et al. 1977) after detrashing of leaves was the principal natural enemy of S. sacchari
has been reported effective in the suppression in Costa Rica but did not survive the cold winter
of the mealybugs. Subsequently, monocroto- (Anonymous 1912); it played an active role in
phos, dichlorvos, demeton-S-methyl, malathion keeping down the mealybug population in the
and quinalphos were 1.09, 1.09, 1.89, 2.39 and Malay States (Malaysia) (Muir and Swezey
3.05 times, respectively, as toxic as endosulfan 1917). However, attempts to control S. sacchari
based on LC50 values (Duhra and Singh 1986); in Egypt in 19221924 through its releases were
carbofuran 3G at 1 kg a.i./ha was found to mini- not successful (Hall 1927). Imported from
mize the incidence of S. sacchari (Pandya Egypt in 1933, the predator was ineffective in
28 Sugarcane 293

Somalia (East Africa) as it failed to penetrate (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) attacking sugar cane in
Egypt. Sugar Cane Int 5:2426
under leaf sheaths where the mealybugs congre-
Abdullah M (2009) Incidence of some major insect pests
gate (Chairamonte 1933). In Hawaii, some con- to sugarcane clones in Bangladesh. Indian Sugar
trol of S. sacchari was achieved with its 59(3):1726
introduction in 1893 (Pemberton 1948, 1964). Abdullah M, Rahman MA, Biswas MM (2006a) Reaction
of some promising sugarcane clones to major insect
When C. montrouzieri was introduced with two
pests under eld condition. Indian Sugar
other predatory coccinellids, namely Hyperaspis 55(10):3742
sp. and Nephus sp., from India in 19681969, Abdullah M, Biswas MM, Siddiquee MNA (2006b)
and the encyrtid Anagyrus saccharicola Response of some promising sugarcane clones to
major insect pests of sugarcane. Indian Sugar
Timberlake (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) was
56(3):2328
introduced from East Africa in 1970 against S. Abdullah M, Alam MA, Rahman MA (2010) Tolerance
sacchari in Barbados, only the parasitoid had status of commercial varieties to major insect pests of
been recovered. Rapid spread, aided by addi- sugarcane. Indian Sugar 59(10):3138
Ahmad T (1942) Report of the second entomologist
tional releases, led to 8.39.7 % parasitism in
(Dipterist) in charge of the scheme for research on
differential rainfall areas by 1972 (Alam 1972). insect pests of sugarcane. Scientic Report of the
Interference by the attendant ant Camponotus Imperial Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi,
compressus F. (Fig. 28.6f) through physical for 19401941, pp 6465
Alam MM (1972) The establishment of Anagyrus sac-
removal of stages of C. montrouzieri (Srikanth
charicola Timb. (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) in
et al. 2001) could be one of the reasons for the Barbados, West Indies, against the sugarcane mealy-
predators limited success. Anagyrus sacchari- bug, Saccharicoccus sacchari (Ckll.)
cola Timberlake releases against S. sacchari in (Hemiptera:Coccidae). Entomophaga 17(4):357363
Ali M (1995) Bionomics of sugarcane mealybug,
ve governorates of upper Egypt during 1999
Kiritshenkella sacchari (Green) (Homoptera,
2000 led to the parasitoids rapid establishment Pseudococcidae). Pakistan J Zool 27(1):1519
and spread with considerable increase in the Anonymous (1912) The sugarcane mealybug in Costa
rates of parasitism (Abd-Rabou 2002; Tohamy Rica. Bol Fom San Jose, Costa Rica. 7:466469
Anonymous (1992) Sugarcane coccoids. Sugarcane Breed
et al. 2008).
Inst Newsl 11(3):12
The imported C. montrouzieri and Aphycus Atiqui MUA, Murad H (1992) Assessment of loss in
terryi Full. were undoubtedly responsible for a sucrose content of sugarcane due to sugarcane mealy-
large measure of control of gray sugarcane bug, Saccharicoccus sacchari Ckll. J Insect Sci
5(2):196197
mealybug Dysmicoccus boninensis in Hawaii
Ayyar TVR (1919) Some south Indian coccids of eco-
(Williams 1931). When introduced into Guam nomic importance (a). J Bombay Nat Hist Soc
from Hawaii in 1926, the predator was occasion- 26(2):621628
ally found to feed on D. boninensis (Swezey Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
1940). In British Guiana, the predator was intro-
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
duced for trials against the mealybug misidenti- ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
ed as Pseudococcus calceolariae (Bodkin importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
1913). The preceding examples illustrate the Bodkin GE (1913) Insect injurious to sugarcane in British
Guiana and their natural enemies. J Board Agric Br
necessity and usefulness of identication and
Guiana 7:2932
introduction of candidate biological control Borah BK, Dutta SK (1995) Varietal reaction of sugarcane
agents not only across nations or continents but to pink mealybug Saccharicoccus sacchari (Cockerell)
also within the country for effective control of infestation. J Agric Sci Soc NE India 8(1):100102
Bovell JR (1921) Insect pests and fungoid diseases, etc.
mealybugs.
Rept Dept Agric Barbados 191819. pp 2227
Chairamonte A (1933) Entomological notes on sugarcane
growing in Italian Samaliland. Agric Colon
References 27:220222
Chelvi CT, Kandasamy R (2009) Field efcacy of
Chrysopa scelestis Bank against sugarcane mealy bug
Abd-Rabou S (2002) Efcacy of the imported parasitoid,
Saccharicoccus sacchari Cockerell. Coop Sugar
Anagyrus saccharicola (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae)
41(1):3739
for the biological control of Saccharicoccus sacchari
294 R. Jayanthi et al.

Chelvi CT, Kandasamy R (2010) Field efcacy of plant Hancock GLR (1926) Annual report of the assistant ento-
products (PLEXIN) for the control of sugarcane suck- mologist. Annual Report of the Department of
ing pests. Coop Sugar 41(11):7579 Agriculture 1925, Entebbe, Uganda, pp 2528
Clausen CP (1978) Introduced parasites and predators Hole UB, Jadhav SR, Teli VS (2009) Evaluation of sugar-
of arthropod pests and weeds: a world review. cane genotypes against major pests. Ann Pl Prot Sci
USDA Hand Book No 480, Agricultural Research 17(2):493494
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington Hutson JC (1918) Some insect pests in Cuba. Agric News
DC, 545 p XVII(421):186187
David H, Easwaramoorthy S, Jayanthi R (1986) Sugarcane Isaac PV, Misra CS (1933) The chief insect pests of sugar-
entomology in India. Sugarcane Breeding Institute, cane and methods for their control. Agric Livest India
Coimbatore, 564 p 3(4):315324
Deka MK, Gupta MK, Singh SN (1999) Effect of differ- Jayanthi R (1986) Mealybugs. In: David H,
ent dust formulations of insecticides on the incidence Easwaramoorthy S, Jayanthi R (eds) Sugarcane ento-
of sugarcane insect pests. Indian Sugar mology in India. Sugarcane Breeding Institute,
49(5):357361 Coimbatore, pp 259275
Dick J (1953) The mealybug and sugar cane. Interim Jayanthi R (1991) An evaluation of the interactions
report on Natal investigations. S Afr Sugar between the sugarcane coccoids and their host plant.
J 37:317323 Ph.D. Thesis, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore,
Dorge SK, Dalaya VP, Pradhan AG (1972) Studies on two India
predatory coccinellid beetles, Pharoscymnus horni Jayanthi R, Goud YS (2001) Phenolic content in sugar-
Weise and Chilocorus nigritus Fab., feeding on sugar- cane stem as related to infestation by Coccoids. Indian
cane scales Aspidiotus glomeratus G. Labdev J Sci J Agric Res 35(3):198201
Tech B (Life Sci) 10(3/4):138141 Jayanthi R, David H, Goud YS (1994) Physical characters
Duhra MS, Singh DP (1986) Relative toxicity of some of sugarcane plant in relation to infestation by
insecticides to the sugar cane mealybug. Sugar Cane Melanaspis glomerata (G.) and Saccharicoccus sac-
6:1011 chari (Ckll.). J Entomol Res 18(4):305314
Ebieda AMM, Badr ST, Ali MK (1998) Studies on sugar- Jayanthi R, David H, Goud YS (1995) Species composi-
cane pests: I eld evaluation of certain insecticides tion and pest status of the mealybugs infesting sugar-
against the economical sugarcane insects alone and cane in Tamil Nadu. Bull Entomol (New Delhi)
their concurrent infestations in upper Egypt. Ann 36(1/2):100106
Agric Sci Moshtohor 36(3):18891901 Kalra AN, Sidhu AS (1964) Sugarcane mealybug,
Francis MA, Kairo WTK, Roda AL, Oscar E, Liburd OE, Saccharicoccus sacchari Ckll., and its control. Proc
Polar P (2012) The passionvine mealybug, All India Conf Sugar Cane Res Dev Workers
Planococcus minor (Maskell) (Hemiptera: 5:557559
Pseudococcidae), and its natural enemies in the cocoa Kapadia MN, Parsana GJ, Butani PG (1995) Field recov-
agroecosystem in Trinidad. Biol Control 60:290296 ery of Anagyrus punctulatus Agarwal, a parasitoid of
Frappa C (1935) Les insectes nuisibles a la canne a sucre the sugarcane mealybug. Indian Sugar 45(6):361362
a Madagascar. Bull Econ Madagascar 3:221230 Khewa MM, Ebaid GH, Shalaby MS, Mansour ES (2006)
Gowdey CC (1926) Report of the government entomolo- Impact of releasing Trichogramma evanescens
gist. Annual Report of the Department of Agriculture (Westwood) and chemical insecticides on the infesta-
1925, Kingston, Jamaica, pp 1012 tion by Chilo agamemnon and Saccharicoccus sac-
Green EE (1908) Remarks on Indian scale insects chari (Cockerell) in sugarcane eld. Ann Agric Sci
(Coccidae), Part III. With a catalogue of all species Moshtohor 44(2):717726
hitherto recorded from the Indian continent. Memoirs Kumarasinghe NC (2003) Insect fauna associated with
Dep Agric India Entomol Ser 2:1546 sugarcane plantations in Sri Lanka. J Environ Biol
Hafez M, Salama HS (1969) Biological studies on the 24(4):359368
sugar cane mealybug, Saccharicoccus sacchari Ckll., Mehta UK, Jayanthi R, David H (1981) Occurrence of
in Egypt (Hemiptera-Homoptera:Coccoidea). Bull pink mealybug on certain early maturing sugarcane
Soc Entomol Egypte 53:499516 varieties. Pestology 5:910
Hall WJ (1922) The outbreak of Pseudococcus sacchari Mesbah HA, Fahmy IS, El-Deeb AS, Gaber AA, Nour AH
Ckll., on the sugar-cane of Egypt. Ministry of (1976) The susceptibility of ten sugar cane varieties to
Agriculture Egypt, Technical & Scientic Service, infestation with borers and mealybugs at Alexandria,
Bulletin no. 26, Cairo, p 16 Egypt. Bull Entomol Soc Egypt 60:403411
Hall WJ (1927) The introduction of Cryptolaemus mon- Mohammad Ali S (1962) Coccids affecting sugarcane in
trouzieri Muls. in Egypt. Bull Entomol Res Bihar (Coccidae: Hemiptera). Indian J Sugar Cane Res
17:385392 Dev 6(2):7275
28 Sugarcane 295

Muir F, Swezey OH (1917) The cane borer beetle in host Antonina graminis (Maskell) (Homoptera-
Hawaii and its control by natural enemies. Report of Coccidae). Fla Entomol 33:1822
Work of the Experiment Station of the Hawaiian Sugar Shah AH, Vaghela NV, Patel AJ, Bhatt JP (1977)
Planters Association. Entomological Series, Bulletin Economics of insecticidal control of sugarcane scale
no. 13, Honolulu, 102 p insect and mealy bugs in Gujarat. Sugar News
Mungomery RW (1932) Report of Assistant Entomologist, 9:7880
Bundaberg. 32nd Annual Report, Bureau of Sugar Singh K, Avasthy PN (1973) Integrated control of sugar-
Experimental Station, Queensland, pp 5557 cane pests and diseases. Indian Sugar 25:373386
Nigam H (1983) Complex of biotic agents associated with Singh A, Solanki RS, Malik K (1997) First record of
pink mealybug of sugarcane, Saccharicoccus sacchari Batrachedra sp. near psilopa Meyrick (Lepidoptera:
Ckll. in Tarai region of Uttar Pradesh. Indian J Entomol Momphidae) as a parasite of sugarcane mealy bug.
45(3):321 Insect Environ 3(2):3637
Pandya HV (1997) Control of sugarcane borers, mealy- Sithanantham S (1973) Varietal incidence of the pink
bugs and scale insects in Gujarat. Coop Sugar mealybug, Saccharicoccus sacchari (Ckll.) in sugar-
28(10):745746 cane during different ages. Coop Sugar
Parsana GJ, Malavia DD, Koshiya DJ (1994) Effect of 4(11):583586
drip irrigation on incidence of insect pests of sugar- Solouma AG (2002) Screening of sugarcane breeder
cane. Gujarat Agric Univ Res J 20(1):1517 materials to infestation with the pink mealybug,
Parsana GJ, Butani PG, Kapadia MN (1995) Varietal pref- (Saccharicoccus sacchari Ckll.) under eld conditions
erence of the sugarcane mealy bug, Saccharicoccus in Egypt. Ann Agric Sci Moshtohor 40(1):535540
sacchari (Cockerell). Indian Sugar 44(10):761762 Srikanth J, Easwaramoorthy S, Kurup NK (2001)
Parsana GJ, Butani PG, Kapadia MN (1996) Parasitism of Camponotus compressus F. interferes with
the sugarcane mealybug, Saccharicoccus sacchari Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant activity in sugar-
(Cockerell) in relation to the weather parameters. cane. Insect Environ 7(2):5152
Gujarat Agric Univ Res J 21(2):141143 Srikanth J, Salin KP, Jayanthi R (2012) Sugarcane pests
Pemberton CE (1938) Occurrence of the grass mealybug and their management. Sugarcane Breeding Institute,
Antonina indica Green on sugarcane. Hawaii Planters Coimbatore, 88 p
Rec 42(2):107108 Swezey OH (1924) Notes on insect pests in Samoa.
Pemberton CE (1948) History of the Entomology Hawaii Planters Rec 28(2):214219
Department Experiment Station. Hawaiian Sugar Swezey OH (1940) A survey of the insect pests of culti-
Planters Association 19041945. Hawaii Planters Rec vated plants in Guam. Hawaii Planters Rec
52:5390 44:151182
Pemberton CE (1964) Highlights in the history of ento- Taleb MA, Rahman MA (2004) Screening of some
mology in Hawaii 17781963. Pac Insects advance clones of sugarcane for their resistance
6(4):689729 against major insect pests. J Agric Rural Dev (Gazipur)
Pruthi HS, Rao VP (1942) Coccids attacking sugarcane in 2(1):8994
India. Indian J Entomol 4:8788 Tewari RK, Yadav RA (2005) Bio-efcacy of newer insec-
Rajendra A (1974) The biology and control of ticides against black bug (Cavelerius sweeti) and
Saccharicoccus sacchari Ckll. (Hom: Pseudococcidae) mealybug (Saccharicoccus sacchari) of sugarcane.
the pink mealy bug of sugar cane in Sri Lanka. Ceylon Indian J Entomol 67(2):175177
J Sci Biol Sci 11(1):2328 Thirumurugan A, Venkatachalam SR, Durai R (2002)
Rao CVN, Rao NV, Bhavani B, Naidu NV (2008) Management of mealy bug, Saccharicoccus sacchari
Dysmicoccus carens, a new species of leaf mealybug (Cockerell) in sugarcane in Tamil Nadu. Plant Prot
infesting sugarcane in Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Plant Bull (Faridabad) 54(3/4):89
Prot 36(2):308309 Tohamy TH, El-Raheem AAA, El-Rawy AM (2008) Role
Rao CVN, Rao NV, Bhavani B, Naidu NV (2009) Survey of the cultural practices and natural enemies for sup-
and surveillance of sugarcane insect pests in Andhra pressing infestation of the pink sugarcane mealybug,
Pradesh. Indian J Plant Prot 37(1/2):2428 Saccharicoccus sacchari (Cockerell) (Hemiptera:
Razak TA, Ananthi DV, Jayanthi R (1994) Biology of the Pseudococcidae) in sugarcane elds at Minia
sugarcane mealybug, Dysmicoccus carens Williams Governorate, Middle Egypt. Egypt J Biol Pest Control
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). J Entomol Res 18(1):177188
18(2):169174 Van Dine DL (1913) Report of the entomologist. Bulletin
Reddy DJ, Aziz SA (2000) Record of Dicrodiplosis sp. on of the Sugar Producers Association of Porto Rico,
sugarcane mealybug. Insect Environ 6(3):104 Experiment Station, August 5, Rio Piedras pp 2546
Riherd PT (1950) Biological notes on Anagyrus antoni- Van Zwaluwenburg RH (1926) Insect enemies of sugar-
nae Timberlake (Hymenoptera-Encyrtidae) and its cane in western Mexico. J Econ Entomol
19(4):664669
296 R. Jayanthi et al.

Veenakumari K, Mohanraj P (1995) Occurrence of the Planters Association Experiment Station, Honolulu,
mealy bug Pseudococcus saccharicola Takahashi Hawaii 400 p
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) on sugarcane, Williams DJ (1970) The mealybugs (Homoptera,
Saccharum ofcinarum Linnaeus a new record from Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae) of sugar-cane, rice and
the Andaman Islands, India. Entomon 20(1):65 sorghum. Bull Entomol Res 60:109188
Wheeler AG Jr, Evans GA, Vandenberg NJ (2010) Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Pseudococcus saccharicola Takahashi (Hemiptera: Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
Pseudococcidae) in the British Virgin Islands: rst London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Western Hemisphere records, with records of a co- Williams DJ, de los Martinez Rivero MA, Campo MS
occurring lady beetle, Hyperaspis scutifera (Mulsant) (2001) Mealybugs on sugarcane in Cuba with a dis-
(Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Proc Entomol Soc Wash cussion of a new record for the New World (Hem.,
112(4):565575 Pseudococcidae). Entomol Mon Mag
Williams FX (1931) Hand book of insects and other inver- 137(1640/1643):7376
tebrates of Hawaiian sugarcane elds. Hawaii Sugar
Fruit Crops: Apple
29
M. Mani

29.1 Species tine concern. Besides, the pest excretes a honey-


dew substance, which can then be a suitable
Mealybugs have been reported to cause damage source for sooty mold to develop. It is this sooty
to apples in New Zealand, South Africa, Japan, mold that can result in rejection or downgrading
New York, Florida, and California (Table 29.1). of the fruit. It is also known to transmit little
cherry disease (Raine et al. 1986; Eastwell and
Bernardy 2001). The presence of Phenacoccus
29.2 Seasonal History graminicola Leonardi under the calyxes of apple
and pears grown for export has caused concern in
The apple mealybug Phenacoccus aceris Sig. Australia and New Zealand (Ward 1966).
overwinters as a second-instar nymph in a cocoon
under scales or in cracks of the bark. Feeding is
done by inserting the proboscis into plant tissues 29.4 Natural Enemies
(bark or leaves) and sucking the plant sap. They
emerge from overwintering sites very early in the The parasitoid Pseudaphycus avidulus (Brthes)
spring, feed on twigs, mature to the adult stage from Argentina and Chile has been collected in
(male and female), and mate. They begin to lay apple orchard infested with Ps. viburni. Other
eggs in early May in central Washington. Only natural enemies observed are Pseudaphycus
one generation was observed in a year. maculipennis (Mercet), Anagyrus pseudococci
(Girault), A. novickyi Hoffer, A. punctulatus
Agarwal and Alam [A. diversicornis (Howard)],
29.3 Damage Leptomastix epona (Walker), Chartocerus sp.,
and Pachyneuron sp. (Kreiter et al. 2005).
Mealybugs take shelter in leaf axils, under bark, The obscure mealybug Pseudococcus
and in the calyx of the fruit. Sucking sap will to viburni, a polyphagous cosmopolitan pest, prob-
some extent devitalize the tree. In addition, the ably got introduced to New Zealand through
apple mealybug can directly infest and feed on commercial trade. Natural enemies included
fruit, possibly becoming a direct pest or a quaran- Ophelosia bifasciata Girault and O. charlesi
Berry (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) and the
M. Mani (*) predatory larvae of Cryptoscenea australiensis
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, (Enderlein) (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae)
Bangalore 560089, India
(Charles et al. 2004).
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 297


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_29
298 M. Mani

Table 29.1 List of mealybug species infecting apple in different regions of the world
Mealybug species Region/Country Reference
Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrhorn) New Zealand McKenzie (1972)
Pseudococcus fragilis Brain, South Africa Myburgh et al. (1975), Swart
Pseudococcus obscurus Essig. (1977)
Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) South Africa Stokwe and Malan (2010)
France Kreiter et al. (2005)
New Zealand Charles et al. (2004)
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni South Africa Stokwe and Malan (2010)
Tozzetti) Japan Morimoto (1976)
Pseudococcus calceolariae (Maskell) South Africa Stokwe and Malan (2010)
Japan Morimoto (1976)
Pseudococcus comstocki (Kuwana) Japan Morimoto (1976)
New York and California
Planococcus citri (Risso) Florida
Phenacoccus aceris Sig. Nova Scotia Gilliatt (1935/1936)
British Columbia Madsen and Proctor (1982),
Marshall and Pickett (1944);
Marshall (1953), Kozar et al.
(1989)
Dysmicoccus debregeasiae (Green) Bangladesh Williams (2004)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus mespili (Signoret) France and Russia Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus graminicola Leonardi Australia and New Zealand Ben-Dov (1994)

Mealybugs on the calyx of the fruit Sooty mold on apple

Anagyrus pseudococci Leptomastix epona


29 Fruit Crops: Apple 299

29.5 Monitoring sprays should reduce the population if they have


emerged from their overwintering sites. The
There are no formal schemes for monitoring the period of crawler emergence in early to mid-June
apple mealybugs. When they are abundant, the is likely another vulnerable point in the life cycle.
egg sacs are quite apparent and will give an indi- Conventional insecticides and insect growth regu-
cation if control is required later. In some cases, lators used against the grape mealybug Ps. mariti-
only a few areas in an orchard may have suf- mus are likely effective. In organic orchards, the
ciently heavy populations to merit control. neem insecticides, timed for crawler emergence,
appear to provide some control. Spray practices
(e.g., high gallonage) that cover the undersides of
29.6 Management the leaves and crevices in the bark will likely be
more effective. Once they begin feeding, mealy-
29.6.1 Chemical Control bugs are not very mobile, and they will not move
around to contact a sparsely applied spray.
Mealybugs appear to emerge in the spring and Avoiding pesticides that destroy parasitoids
move onto young developing shoots to feed. As should also help keep this species at a low level.
the fruit develops and the leaves toughen up (if
not controlled), they can move into the calyx of
the fruit and then into the heart of the apple. They 29.6.2 Biological Control
need to be controlled before they are able to move
into the calyx of the fruit. Aminocarb (Matacil 75 29.6.2.1 Phenacoccus aceris
% wettable powder (WP)) at 1.5 lb/100 gal was Parasitoids are likely the most effective biocon-
best, followed by phosmet (Imidan) at 1 lb against trol agents of the apple mealybug P. aceris. The
Ps. maritimus in New Zealand. Nine applications best-known parasitoid is Allotropus utilis
of each insecticide tested were made between Muesbeck, a platygastrid wasp discovered and
petal fall and harvest (McKenzie 1972). In named in 1939 in Nova Scotia (Gilliatt 1939;
S. Africa, although the mealybugs were present Muesbeck 1939). This species was exported to
in many orchards, they were well controlled in British Columbia where it became well estab-
most of the cases, and serious infestations were lished. This was considered one of the outstand-
associated with inefcient or infrequent spray- ing successes of classical biological control. In
ing. Mealybugs Ps. fragilis and Ps. viburni Washington, the parasitic wasp Anagyrus sp. was
appeared to be under good control through inten- found attacking a heavy infestation of apple
sive spray regimes (Myburgh et al. 1975). A mealybug in an organic orchard. A high percent-
description is provided for ten recommended age of the overwintering generation was parasit-
insecticides on their formulations, concentra- ized. In S. Africa, Pseudaphycus malinus Gah., a
tions, dosages, times of application, and with- good host-searching parasitoid, was released by
holding periods (Swart 1977). pinning sheets of paper bearing parasitized mum-
If mealybug is a cause for concern, then moni- mied mealybugs produced in the laboratory to
toring can be a valuable tool. Monitoring can the fruit trees; about 2000 adult parasites emerged
assist managers to make decisions on the timing per sheet, and three sheets were usually required
of sprays when thresholds are exceeded. If insec- for each moderately infested apple tree and two
ticides are required, they are best applied early in sheets per pear tree. The best time for application
the season when the mealybug crawlers and of the sheets proved to be during the second- and
nymphs emerge. Clothianidin is one of the few third-nymphal instars of the pest in the spring;
registered products for control of mealybugs in this method was found to control even heavy
apples. Dormant, petal-fall, summer, and posthar- infestations in orchards when used for two suc-
vest sprays for Ph. aceris are recommended in cessive seasons, and chemical applications could
British Columbia. Dormant or delayed dormant be reduced gradually from the third season
300 M. Mani

onwards. Since Pseudaphycus malinus is highly


susceptible to chemical insecticides, these should
not be applied within 10 days before or 15 days
after releasing the parasitoid (Morimoto 1976).

29.6.2.2 Pseudococcus viburni


Five primary hymenopteran parasitoid species
were reared from P. viburni-infesting apples.
Pseudectroma sp. was the predominant parasitoid
species recovered, accounting for 84.3 % of the
total number of primary parasitoids reared. No
predators were recovered from the infested apple
fruit in S. Africa. In Western Cape Province, South Pseudaphycus maculipennis
Africa, an isolate of Heterorhabditis zealandica
Poinar was found to cause mortality of P. viburni
up to 80 % after 48 h. The life cycle of H. zea- The rst release into New Zealand was made in
landica was completed in a period of 810 days, February 2001 when it became the rst biocon-
during which relatively few nematodes penetrated trol agent to be released under the Hazardous
the mealybugs. This can be attributed to the rela- Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act
tively small size of the adult female mealybug 1996 (Charles 2001).
(6 3 mm) in comparison with that of the nema- Approximately 750,000 P. maculipennis were
tode (0.7 0.03 mm). Once penetrated inside the released in 41 pipfruit orchards in Hawkes Bay,
mealybug, the nematode can grow within a few Nelson/Motueka and Auckland, and to the
days to the same length as, and even longer than, Wellington Botanic Gardens between 2001 and
the mealybug. All stages of P. viburni beyond 2004. At least a year later, mealybug infestation
crawlers appeared to be susceptible to nematode was controlled with a recovery rate of 83 % in
infection. Hence, control in the eld should take Hawkes Bay and 60 % in the Nelson orchards
place when the intermediates and adults are most and from the Wellington Botanic Gardens, indi-
abundant (Stokwe and Malan 2010). cating that the parasitoid has a solid foothold in
In New Zealand, Ps. viburni probably might New Zealand. Pseudaphycus maculipennis have
have got introduced through commercial trade. It dispersed since their release at a natural rate of
has been an important pest of pipfruit (the term about 200 m/year (Charles et al. 2004). In New
pipfruit refers to apples and pears, because of Zealand, the parasitoid Pseudaphycus maculip-
the small hard seeds (pips) in the centre of the ennis was attracted to the synthetic sex-
fruit) in Hawkes Bay for at least 50 years pheromone-baited traps. The presence of P.
(Charles 1989). Pseudaphycus maculipennis maculipennis in pheromone traps suggests recog-
(Mercet) (Hym: Encyrtidae) is host-specic and nition of the host female sex pheromone as kairo-
an internal parasitoid of Ps. viburni, and has mone. The nding of the kairomonal activity in
reportedly provided good control of obscure the parasitoid has simplied monitoring to deter-
mealybug in France and the Republic of Georgia. mine the post-introduction establishment of the
It is a facultatively gregarious endoparasitoid; it biological control agent (Bell et al. 2006).
is a koinobiont, ovipositing in one developmen-
tal stage of the mealybug (usually the third-instar 29.6.2.3 Pseudococcus maritimus
female, although second instars and adult The impact of native natural enemies on popula-
females are also attacked) and emerging from tions of the grape mealybug Pseudococcus mari-
the next (usually the adult). Male and female timus (Ehrhorn) in apple and pear orchards was
wasps often emerge from the same mealybug. assessed using a combination of techniques,
29 Fruit Crops: Apple 301

including exclusion cages, limb-banding, and Gilliatt FC (1936) Observations on the mealybug,
Phenacoccus aceris Sig. Can Entomol 68:133
visual inspection of shoots and fruits. The com-
Gilliatt FC (1939) The life history of Allotropa utlilis
plex of native natural enemies (which included Mues., a hymentoperous parasite of the orchard mealy
two encyrtid parasitoids, namely Pseudaphycus bug in Nova Scotia. Can Entomol 71:160161
websteri Timberlake and Mayridia sp.), a cocci- Grasswitz TR, Burts EC (1995) Effect of native natural
enemies on the population dynamics of grape mealy-
nellid beetle (Hyperaspis lateralis Mulsant), and
bug Pseudococcus maritimus (Homop; Pseducoccidae)
a chamaemyiid y (Leucopis verticalis Malloch) in apple and pear orchards. Entomophaga
provided a reasonably good control in orchards 45(1):105117
that had not been treated with insecticides for 12 Kozar F, Humble LM, Foottit RG, Orvos IS (1989) New
and little known scale insect (Homoptera: Coccoidea)
years. However, surveys indicated that most of
from British Columbia. J Entomol Soc BC 86:7077
these species were absent from orchards regu- Kreiter P, Delvare G, Giug L, Thaon M, Viaut M (2005)
larly sprayed with pesticides (Grasswitz and First inventory of the natural enemies of Pseudococcus
Burts 1995). viburni (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae). [French]. Bull
Soc Entomol Fr 110(2):161164
Madsen HF, Proctor PJ (1982) Insects and mites of tree
fruits in British Columbia. Ministry of Agriculture and
References Food, Victoria, pp 170
Marshall J (1953) A decade of pest control in British
Bell VA, Walker JTS, Suckling DM, Manning LA, El Columbia. Proc Entomol Soc BC 49:711
Sayed AM, Shaw PW, Wallis DR, Miller JG, Shaw PV Marshall J, Pickett AD (1944) The present status of the
(2006) Trapping obscure mealybug (Pseudococcus apple mealybug, Phenacoccus aceris Sig., in
viburni) and its natural enemy Pseudaphycus maculip- British Columbia and Nova Scotia [Note]. Can
ennis (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) in apple orchards Entomol 76:19
(Poster Abstract). N Z Plant Protect 59:64 McKenzie DJ (1972) Control of codling moth, leaf roller
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- and mealybug in apples. Orchardist N Z 46(5):155
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Morimoto R (1976) A study of the biological control of
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- Comstock mealybugs, Pseudococcus comstocki
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic Kuwana. Rev Plant Prot Res 9:7289
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover. 686 p Muesbeck CFW (1939) A new mealybug parasite
Charles JG (1989) Pseudococcidae, mealybugs (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Can Entomol
(Homoptera). In: Cameron PJ et al (eds) A review of 71:158160
biological control of invertebrate pests and weeds in Myburgh AC, Rust DJ, Stubbings D (1975) Mealybugs on
New Zealand 18741987, Technical Communication apples and pears. Deciduous Fruit Grower
10. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 223236 25(7):176179
Charles JG (2001) Introduction of a parasitoid for mealy- Raine J, McMullen RD, Forbes AR (1986) Transmission
bug control: a case study under new environmental of the agent causing little cherry disease by the apple
legislation. N Z Plant Prot 54:3741 mealybug Phenacoccus aceris and the dodder Cuscuta
Charles JG, Allan DJ, Rogers DJ, Cole LM, Shaw PW, lupuliformis. Can J Plant Pathol 8:611
Wallis DR (2004) Mass-rearing, establishment and Stokwe NF, Malan AP (2010) Potential use of entomo-
dispersal of Pseudaphycus maculipennis, a biocontrol pathogenic nematodes for biological control of mealy-
agent for obscure mealybug. N Z Plant Prot bugs on apples and pears. SA Fruit J 9(3):3839, 42
57:177182 Swart PL (1977) Mealybugs: more economic manage-
Eastwell KC, Bernardy MG (2001) Partial characteriza- ment on apples and pears. Deciduous Fruit Grower
tion of a closterovirus associated with apple mealybug- 27(6):186191
transmitted little cherry disease in North America. Ward A (1966) Mealybugs (Hemiptera: pesudococcidae).
Phytopathology 91:268273 Acta Entomol Sinica 28:444446
Gilliatt FC (1935) A mealybug, Phenacoccus aceris Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Signoret, a new apple pest in Nova Scotia. Can Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD.,
Entomol 67:161164 London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Fruit Crops: Pears
30
M. Mani

30.1 Species pest in pear orchards because of the destruction


of its natural enemies by the frequent application
Mealybugs are injurious to pears in Korea, of organochlorine and organophosphorus insecti-
Tasmania, New York, Australia, New Zealand, cides (Morimoto 1976).
Chile, China, Washington, Yakima and so forth
(Table 30.1). Pseudococcus longispinus (Tar-Toz.)
and Pseudococcus viburni (Ps. obscurus Essig.) 30.3 Management
have been reported in commercial pear orchards of
South Africa (Myburg et al. 1975; Swart 1977). Although mealybugs were present in many
orchards, they were well controlled in most cases,
and serious infestations were associated with inef-
30.2 Damage cient or infrequent spraying. Pseudococcus
viburni (P. obscurus) appeared to predominate
The Comstock mealybug Pseudococcus com- under intensive spray regimes, whereas the propor-
stocki (Kuwana) poses two major concerns for tions of P. longispinus increased under light or no-
pear processing industry of New York. First, the spray programs (Myburg et al. 1975). Pseudaphycus
emergence of crawlers and adult females from malinus Gah., a good host-searching parasitoid,
the calyx of pears at packhouses creates a nui- was released during the second and third nymphal
sance to workers. Second, pears to be made into instars of the pest in the spring; this method was
puree typically are not peeled or cored by the found to control even heavy infestations in orchards
processors, so infestations can result in unaccept- if used for two successive seasons, and chemical
able contamination of the product. Another cause applications could be reduced gradually from the
of concern to pear growers is that honeydew third season onwards. Around 2000 adult parasites
secreted by crawlers is a substrate to sooty molds emerged per sheet, and two sheets were usually
growing on the fruit surface. These molds result required for each moderately infested pear tree
in downgrading of the fruit and therefore an addi- (Morimoto 1976). Notes are provided for each of
tional cause of economic loss. In Japan, Ps. com- the ten recommended insecticides, and their formu-
stocki has become the most regularly occurring lations, concentrations, dosages, times of applica-
tion, and withholding periods are given for the
M. Mani (*) control of mealybugs (Swart 1977).
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Heterorhabditis zealandica Poinar was known
Bangalore 560089, India to cause mortality on Pseudococcus viburni in
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 303


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_30
304 M. Mani

Table 30.1 List of mealybugs recorded on pears in different countries


Mealybug Species Region, Country References
Crisicoccus matsumotoi (Siraiwa) Korea Park et al. (2010)
Dysmicoccus prochilus Williams Tasmania Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus wistariae (Green) New York and China Ben-Dov (1994)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus aceris (Signoret) Nearctic and Palaearctic region Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Furness (1976), Stokwe and
and Chile Malan (2010), Charles (1993),
Curkovic et al. (1995)
Pseudococcus comstocki (Kuwana) Korea, New York, USSR, and Japan Seo et al.(2010), Agnello
et al.(1992), Dantsig and
Shtundyuk (1975), Morimoto
(1976)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Florida
Pseudococcus calceolariae (Maskell) New Zealand and South Africa Charles (1993), Wakgari and
Giliomee (2004)
Planococcus kraunhiae (Kuw.) Korea Park et al.(2010)
Pseudococcus longispinus India Williams (2004)
(TargioniTozzetti) South Africa Myburg et al.(1975), Swart
(1977)
Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrhorn) Washington and Yakima Miller et al.(1996), Warner
(2000)

South Africa up to 80 % after 48 h. All stages of References


P. viburni beyond crawlers appeared to be sus-
ceptible to nematode infection. Hence, control in Agnello AM, Spangler SM, Reissig SM, Lawson DS,
the eld should take place when the intermedi- Weires RW (1992) Seasonal development and man-
agement strategies for comstock mealybug
ates and adults are most abundant (Stokwe and (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in New York pear
Malan 2010). orchards. J Econ Entomol 85(1):212225
Acceptable control of Pseudococcus com- Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
stocki in pears grown for processing in New York bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
could be attained with one or two sprays of ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
parathion-methyl, diazinon, or methomyl, timed importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
to coincide with each generation of larvae; Charles JG (1993) A survey of mealybugs and their natu-
double-sided tape traps on the scaffold branches ral enemies in horticultural crops in North Island, New
Zealand, with implications for biological control.
are the recommended monitoring tactic for the Biocontrol Sci Technol 3(4):405418
timing of sprays. Heavily infested orchards with Curkovic ST, Barria PG, Gonzalez RR (1995) Preliminary
no history of control measures may initially observations on insects and mites on grapes, pears,
require a total of three or four insecticide applica- plums and persimmons detected with corrugated band
traps [Spanish]. Acta Entomol Chilena 19:143154
tions, but this number can be reduced in subse- Dantsig EM, Shtundyuk AV (1975) Comstocks mealy-
quent years (Agnello et al. 1992). bug in the south of the maritime province [Russian].
The appearance of grape mealybug Ps. Zashchita Rastenii 2:28
Maritimus in stone fruit orchards in the Yakima Furness GO (1976) The dispersal, age-structure and natu-
ral enemies of the long-tailed mealybug, Pseudococcus
area is reported. Best control results are achieved longispinus (Targioni-Tozzetti), in relation to sam-
by applications of organophosphate and oil at the pling and control. Aust J Zool 24(2):237247
delayed dormant to prepink stage and imidaclo- Miller RH, Dunley JE, Hill WB (1996) IPM in pears: the
prid at petal fall. Green lacewing can be used for grape mealybug problem. Good Fruit Grower
47(3):3537, 40
biological control (Warner 2000).
30 Fruit Crops: Pears 305

Morimoto R (1976) A study of the biological control of Stokwe NF, Malan AP (2010) Potential use of entomo-
Comstock mealybug, Pseudococcus comstocki pathogenic nematodes for biological control of mealy-
Kuwana. Rev Plant Prot Res 9:7289 bugs on apples and pears. SA Fruit J 9(3):3839, 42
Myburg AC, Rust DJ, Stubbings D (1975) Mealybugs on Swart PL (1977) Mealybugs: more economic manage-
apples and pears. Deciduous Fruit Grower 25(7): ment on apples and pears. Deciduous Fruit Grower
176179 27(6):186191
Park DS, Leem YJ, Hahn KW, Suh SJ, Hong KJ, Oh HW Wakgari WM, Giliomee JH (2004) Mealybugs and their
(2010) Molecular identication of mealybugs parasitoids in apple and pear orchards in the Western
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) found on Korean pears. Cape Province, South Africa. Afr Plant Prot
J Econ Entomol 103(1):2533 10(1):711
Seo HH, Lee JY, Jung HW (2010) Fruit appearance Warner G (2000) Mealybug shows up in soft fruit. From
improvement by using lter-attached paper bags in grapes, to pears, and now soft fruits, grape mealybug
Niitaka pears. Hortic Environ Biotechnol continues its advance. Good Fruit Grower 51(6):21
51(2):7377 Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Fruit Crops: Plum
31
M. Mani

31.1 Species

Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) is reported as


pest of plums in Chile (Gonzalez et al. 1996)
(Fig. 31.1). In Porterville, Tulare County,
California, Pseudococcus comstocki (Kuw.) has
been reported from a total of 65 food plants,
including plum (Meyerdirk and Newell 1979).
The Comstock mealybug P. comstocki was also
observed in the Odessa region of the Crimea
(USSR) on plum (Romanchenko and Belskaya
1981). In Apsheronsk Peninsula, Azerbaijan Fig. 31.1 Pseudococcus viburni as pest of plums in Chile
SSR, USSR, Phenacoccus mespili Sign. was
shown to be a pest of many fruit crops, including
cherry plum. In Chile, plums were found infested
with P. viburni and its associated ant, Iridomyrmex 31.2 Damage
humilis (Mayr) (Curkovic et al. 1995).
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) was found in a In Chile, obscure mealybug P. viburni in plums
plum orchard in Auckland, New Zealand, in and apples move into the fruits during a long
November (Richmond and Cowley 1998). migratory process that precludes a proper control
Rhizoecus kondonis Kuwana is a subterranean timing (Gonzalez and Volosky 2004).
pest of plums and other crops, primarily in the
Sacramento Valley of California. Signicantly,
more R. kondonis were found 15.245.7 cm deep 31.3 Management
in the soil (averaging 8.3/1240 cm3 soil core sam-
ple) compared with depths of 015.2 cm (averag- 31.3.1 Chemical Control
ing 2.2/sample) (Godfrey and Pickel 1998).
Pseudococcus viburni is reported as pest of
plums in Chile. Corrugated trap bands attached to
M. Mani (*) the trunk were necessary to monitor the incidence
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, of mealybugs. The insecticides were evaluated
Bangalore 560089, India mostly as postharvest treatments: chlorpyrifos,
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 307


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_31
308 M. Mani

chlorpyrifos-methyl, diazinon, dimethoate, mixture Uzbekistan laboratory, reared locally, and dis-
of dimethoate and methidathion, fenamiphos, imi- tributed in the Odessa region. This parasitoid had
dacloprid, methidathion, omethoate, oxydemeton- been already observed in Odessa, but it multi-
methyl, parathion, profenofos, and prothiofos. plied slowly, and regular releases were necessary
Postharvest treatments as high-volume sprays during the period of appearance of the second
(handguns) signicantly reduced insect popula- instar nymphs of each generation. Mass releases
tions. However, survival rates under bark as well of parasites had begun in 1977, and the effective-
as on plum roots made it necessary to apply com- ness reached 76.896.8 % in 1978. No releases or
plementary sprays in October and in December other control measures were undertaken in 1979,
January, both periods corresponding to extensive and infestation declined rapidly, parasitism being
migratory ows to the bunches and fruits. In this 98 %. Subsequent observations showed that
context, the control of P. afnis with trunk and soil Pseudaphycus readily became established in the
applications of chlorpyrifos proved necessary Odessa area and provided sufcient control for
(Gonzalez et al. 1996). Application of sprays of articial rearing and release to be discontinued.
diazinon, methidathion, and profenofos after the Since the outbreak appeared to have been due to
fruit harvest against Pseudococcus viburni (P. af- the importation of infested pomegranates, quar-
nis) was evaluated on table grapes and plums in antine measures were taken to ensure that such
Chile. These treatments considerably reduced pest imports were free from the mealybug
population levels. Nymphal mortality was greater (Romanchenko and Belskaya 1981).
than mortality of mature females (Gonzalez et al.
1995). In Chile, a new approach to minimize risks 31.3.2.3 Azerbaijan SSR, USSR
is suggested through control programs against P. In Apsheronsk Peninsula in the Azerbaijan SSR,
viburni in plums starting at the postharvest season, USSR, Phenacoccus mespili Sign was shown to
followed in the next early spring season with the be a pest of peach, apricot, quince, cherry plum
chitin inhibitor buprofezin. The use of neonicoti- [Prunus divaricata], cherry, bird cherry, apple,
noid insecticides is also under development to pear, and ash [Fraxinus]. The pest had two com-
include acetamiprid, imidacloprid, thiacloprid, plete generations and a partial one per year. The
and thiamethoxam (Gonzalez and Volosky 2004). rst generation developed in about 65 days and
The efcacy of spring and postharvest treatments the second in about 45.2 days. The most impor-
of insecticides (chlorpyrifos, ethoprophos, and tant natural enemy was the encyrtid Pseudaphycus
carbofuran) against P. viburni in plum orchards phenacocci Yasnosh that parasitized about 73.8
(cv. Larry Anne) in Chile is also discussed % of the pest population in late August and
(Gonzalez et al. 2001). September. Other parasitoids recorded were
Aphycus hadzibejliae Trjapitzin and Allotropa
mecrida (Walker), while the predators were
31.3.2 Biological Control Chilocorus bipustulatus L., Chrysoperla carnea
(Stephens), and Leucopis alticeps Czerny
31.3.2.1 California (Ibadova 1985).
In California, exotic parasitoids Allotropa burrelli
Mues., A. convexifrons Mues., and Pseudaphycus 31.3.2.4 Chile
malinus Gah were found to be successfully estab- Pseudococcus viburni (Ps. afnis) has become an
lished on Ps. comstocki (Meyerdirk and Newell economically important pest of Japanese plums
1979). in Chile. At harvest, a higher number of fruits are
infested inside the pedicel cavity. Mid-to-late
31.3.2.2 Crimea (USSR) season cultivars are often infested, and oviposit-
In the Odessa region of the Crimea (USSR), for ing females occur on fruits from mid-January.
control of the Comstock mealybug Ps. comstocki Postharvest treatments with chlorpyrifos,
on plum, Pseudaphycus was introduced from the methidathion, and a mixture of dimethoate and
31 Fruit Crops: Plum 309

chlorpyrifos are recommended for control of the afnis (Maskell) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), with
diazinon, methidathion and profenofos. Agric Tecnica
mealybugs (Gonzalez 1991).
(Santiago) 55(2):9598
Gonzalez RH, Curkovic ST, Barria PG (1996) Evaluation
of the efcacy of insecticides against mealybugs in
References plums and grapes (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae).
[Spanish]. Rev Frutic 17(2):4557
Gonzalez RH, Jorge Poblete G, Gerardo Barria P (2001)
Curkovic ST, Barria PG, Gonzalez RH (1995) Preliminary
The tree fruit mealybug in Chile, Pseudococcus
observations on insects and mites on grapes, pears,
viburni (Signoret) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae).
plums and persimmons detected with corrugated band
Revista Fruticola 22(1):1726
traps [Spanish]. Acta Entomol Chilena 19:143154
Ibadova SI (1985) The apple mealybug Phenacoccus mes-
Godfrey LD, Pickel C (1998) Seasonal dynamics and
pili Sign and its natural enemies in the Apsheronskiy
management schemes for a subterranean mealybug,
Peninsula [Russian]. Izv Akad Nauk Azerbaidzhanskoi
Rhizoecus kondonis Kuwana, pest of alfalfa. Southwest
SSR Biol Nauk 1:3236
Entomol 23(4):343350
Meyerdirk DE, Newell IM (1979) Importation, coloniza-
Gonzalez RH (1991) Mealybugs (Homoptera:
tion, and establishment of natural enemies on the
Pseudococcidae), a new pest of Japanese plums in
Comstock mealybug in California. J Econ Entomol
Chile [Spanish]. Rev Frutic 12(1):37
72(1):7073
Gonzalez RH, Volosky FC (2004) Mealybugs and fruit
Richmond JE, Cowley JM (1998) Pineapple mealybug in
moth: quarantine problems affecting fresh fruit exports
New Zealand? Orchardist 71(7):71
[Spanish]. Rev Frutic 25(2):4162
Romanchenko AA, Belskaya NM (1981) The Comstock
Gonzalez RH, Curkovic ST, Barria PG (1995) Postharvest
mealybug in the Odess region [Russian]. Zashchita
control of the grape and plum mealybug Pseudococcus
Rastenii 4:41
Fruit Crops: Peaches
32
M. Mani

Comstock mealybug, Pseudococcus comstocki the second in about 45.2 days. The most impor-
(Kuwana), has been reported on peaches in tant natural enemy was the encyrtid Pseudaphycus
Illinois. Egg masses are commonly present on phenacocci Yasnosh which parasitized about
fruits, limbs, and bases of new shoots. 73.8 % of the pest population in late August and
Phenacoccus mespili Sign. is known to be a pest September. Other parasitoids recorded were
of peaches in the Azerbaijan SSR, USSR (Ibadova Aphycus hadzibejliae Trjapitzin and Allotropa
1985).In Apsheronskiy Peninsula in the mecrida (Walker), while the predators were
Azerbaijan SSR, USSR, the pest had two com- Chilocorus bipustulatus L., Chrysoperla carnea
plete generations and a partial one per year. The (Stephens) and Leucopis alticeps Czerny
rst generation developed in about 65 days and (Ibadova 1985).

Mealybug on fruits Mealybug on shoot

Reference
Ibadova SI (1985) The apple mealybug Phenacoccus mes-
M. Mani (*) pili Sign., and its natural enemies in the Apsheronskiy
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Peninsula [Russian]. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk
Bangalore 560089, India Azerbaidzhanskoi SSR Biologicheskikh Nauk
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in 1:3236

Springer India 2016 311


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_32
Fruit Crops: Persimmon
33
M. Mani

33.1 Species Prestidge et al. (1989) surveyed pest incidence on


persimmons and found that a range of mealybug
In Japan, Planococcus kraunhiae (Kuw.) and species were present on the fruit at harvest in
Phenacoccus pergandei Ckll. were present on the New Zealand. Pseudococcus longispinus is a
buds in a concentrated distribution in a persim- potential quarantine pest of persimmons, for
mon orchard (Ueno 1971). Pseudococcus viburni example, on New Zealand fruit exported to Japan
(Signoret) (P. obscurus Essig) is known to attack (Steven and Sale 1985). In Chile, Pseudococcus
persimmon in southern France and Italy viburni is known to infest persimmons (Curkovic
(Tranfaglia 19721973). In Israel, Planococcus et al. 1995).
citri (Risso) settles under the sepal and the con-
nection between fruit and leaves. It sucks the
fruits, and the honeydew causes black knots.
Ants are the main transferring factor of the
mealybugs, and they protect them against preda-
tors and parasitoids (Izhar 1999; Dunkelblum
et al. 2002). There was an outbreak of mealybug
Planococcus kraunhiae (Kuwana) on persim-
mons treated with a synthetic pyrethroid cyper-
methrin (Morishita 2005a, b). Recently, the
damage caused by Pl. kraunhiae is increasing on
persimmons. This might be due to the develop-
ment of resurgence that occurred when natural
enemies population decreased with the use of Planococcus kraunhiae
synthetic pyrethroids (Tsutsumi 1997). In New
Zealand, Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni-
Tozzetti) and Ps. calceolariae (Maskell) were In Japan, persimmons infested by Pl.
reported on persimmons (Charles 1993). kraunhiae and Phenacoccus pergandei Ckll.,
overwintered individuals of both species were
present in early spring on the buds, those of the
M. Mani (*) rst species were signicantly more abundant
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, on the topmost buds of the twigs than on those
Bangalore 560089, India lower down, while those of the second were
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 313


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_33
314 M. Mani

distributed more or less evenly on all buds. Neonicotinoids were the most toxic to the Pl.
Over the whole orchard, the frequency distribu- kraunhiae on persimmon, followed by organo-
tion of immature individuals appeared to cor- phosphates, while the synthetic pyrethroids were
respond to a concentrated distribution. Within a less effective in Japan (Morishita 2006).
tree, the frequency distribution of the number A mean LT 99 of Ps. longispinus at 44 C was
of individuals per bud varied with density; 74.2 min, which decreased to 15.1 min at 54
when it was low, it corresponded to Poissons C. Hot water immersion appeared to be a poten-
curve, but when it was high (more than about tially useful disinfestation method. The mortality
0.5/bud), it could be tted to the concentrated response of Ps. longispinus on persimmons to hot
type. The same trend was observed in both spe- water immersion treatments between 44 and 54
cies (Ueno 1971). C was examined. The calyx of the persimmon
Ferrisia gilli, Gills mealybug, is a newly was found to offer thermal protection for
described species of mealybug that is spreading P. Longispinus, resulting in lower insect mortal-
throughout California, infesting many stone ity under the calyx compared to that on the out-
fruits and also persimmons (Gullan et al. 2003). side of the fruit (Lester et al. 1995). Koide et al.
Parasitoids that include wasps in the genera (2009) predicted the hatch timing of the mealy-
Pseudaphycus, Chrysoplatycerus, and Anagyrus bug Pl. kraunhiae in persimmon orchards using
have been shown to effectively reduce Gills the effective accumulated temperature calcula-
mealybug populations on persimmon crop sys- tion simulation of the JPP-NET in Aichi.
tems where pyrethrin-based insecticide use is Hot air treatment of P. longispinus on persim-
very limited. mons achieved 99 % mortality of the mealybug
with 12.4 h at 44 C, which reduced to 4.5 h at 47
C and 3.8 h at 50 C (Dentener et al. 1996).
33.2 Management Treatment at a 47 C-persimmon esh tempera-
ture for up to 3 h after a 2-h warm-up period, fol-
Application of chlorpyrifos (5 %) and diazinon (4 lowed by immediate cold storage, has the
%) applied around the trunk gave excellent results benecial effect of delaying the onset of chilling
against ants. All the treatments greatly reduced injury in persimmons while causing only slight
the population of mealybug P. citri (Izhar 1999). internal and external damage to the fruit (Woolf
There are three generations of Japanese mealy- et al. 1997). Therefore, a combined heat-to-cold
bug, Planococcus kraunhiae, on persimmons storage treatment may be effective for disinfesta-
each year. Chemicals are to be applied usually in tions of P. longispinus on persimmons. An esti-
June and August when rst instar nymphs, the mated treatment time of 3.3 h (including a 2-h
most susceptible to insecticides, appear. The den- warm-up period) at 44 C, followed by a 40-day
sity of Japanese mealybug, Planococcus cold storage at 0 C, was needed to achieve 99 %
kraunhiae, on Japanese persimmon fruit was mortality (Dentener et al. 1997).
higher in plots frequently treated with cyperme- Cryptolaemus montrouzieri was introduced
thrin than that in the untreated plot. The number into Japan for the control of Planococcus
of mealybugs found on Fuyu, a non-astringent kraunhiae on persimmon (Ishi 1940).
cultivar, was higher than that on Hiratanenashi,
an astringent cultivar. The following additional
control measures should be taken in heavily References
infested orchards: (1) eliminating overwintering
nymphs by scraping away the tree bark, (2) Charles JG (1993) A survey of mealybugs and their natu-
ral enemies in horticultural crops in North Island, New
spraying the tree with petroleum oil in winter,
Zealand, with implications for biological control.
and (3) applying pesticides from late April to Biocontrol Sci Technol 3(4):405418
early May when overwintering nymphs move to Curkovic ST, Barria PG, Gonzalez RR (1995) Preliminary
the top of shoots (Morishita 2005a, b). observations on insects and mites on grapes, pears,
33 Fruit Crops: Persimmon 315

plums and persimmons detected with corrugated band Morishita M (2005b) Resurgence of Japanese mealybug,
traps [Spanish]. Acta Entomol Chilena 19:143154 Planococcus kraunhiae (Kuwana), in persimmon
Dentener PR, Alexander SM, Lester PJ, Petry RJ, induced by a synthetic pyrethroid cypermethrin
Maindonald JH, McDonald RM (1996) Hot air treat- [Japanese]. Ann Rep Kansai Plant Prot Soc
ment for disinfestation of lightbrown apple moth and 47:125126
longtailed mealy bug on persimmons. Postharv Biol Morishita M (2006) Susceptibility of the mealybug,
Technol 8:143152 Planococcus kraunhiae (Kuwana) (Thysanoptera:
Dentener PR, Bennett KV, Hoy LE, Lewthwaite SE, Thripidae), to insecticides evaluated by the petri dish-
Lester PJ, Maindonald JH, Connolly PG (1997) spraying tower method [Japanese]. Jpn J Appl
Postharvest disinfestation of light brown apple moth Entomol Zool 50(3):211216
and longtailed mealybug on persimmons using heat Prestidge RA, Holland PT, Clarke AD, Malcolm CP
and cold. Postharv Biol Technol 12:255264 (1989) Pesticides for use close to and during harvest of
Dunkelblum E, Zada A, Gross S, Fraistat P, Mendel Z persimmons. In: Popay AJ (ed) Proceedings of the
(2002) Sex pheromone and analogs of the citrus 42nd New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Conference,
mealybug, Planococcus citri: synthesis and biological New Plymouth, New Zealand, pp 195199
activity. Bull OILB/SROP 25(9):213220 Steven D, Sale PR (1985) Insect control trials on persim-
Gullan PJ, Downie DA, Steffan SA (2003) A new pest mons. In: Hartley MJ (ed) Proceedings of the 38th
species of the mealybug genus Ferrisia Fullaway New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Conference,
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from the United States. Rotorua, New Zealand, pp 203206
Ann Entomol Soc Am 96:723737 Tranfaglia A (19721973) Studies on Homoptera
Ishi T (1940) The problem of biological control in Japan. Coccoidea I on the discovery in Campania of
Proc 6th Pac Sci Congr 4:365367 Pseudococcus obscurus Essig, a species new to the
Izhar J (1999) Preliminary experiment to control ants as a Italian fauna [Italian]. Bollettino del Laboratorio di
transferring factor of millibug (Pseudococcus citricu- Entomologia Agraria Filippo Silvestri Portici
lus, Planococcus citri) in persimmon [Hebrew]. Alon 30:294299
Hanotea 53(12):490492 Tsutsumi T (1997) Effect of mospilan on the control of
Koide T, Suzuki H, Kuwayama S, Yamaguchi K (2009) Japanes mealybug on persimmon tree (Japanese).
Prediction of the hatch timing of the mealy bug Noyaku Jidai 174:2729
Planococcus kraunhiae (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) Ueno H (1971) Studies on the scale insects that attack the
in persimmon orchards using the effective accumu- Japanese persimmon Diospyros kaki
lated temperature calculation simulation of the JPP- L. II. Interrelationships between overwintered larvae
NET in Aichi [Japanese]. Ann Rep Kansai Plant Prot of the Japanese wisteria cottony mealybug,
Soc 51:115116 Planococcus kraunhiae Kuwana, and the elongate cot-
Lester PJ, Dentener PR, Petry RJ, Alexander SM (1995) tony scale, Phenacoccus pergandei Cockerell, in the
Hot-water immersion for disinfestation of lightbrown orchard [Japanese]. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool
apple moth (Epiphyas postvittana) and longtailed 15(4):211214
mealy bug (Pseudococcus longispinus) on persim- Woolf AB, Ball S, Spooner KJ, Lay Yee M, Ferguson IB,
mons. Postharv Biol Technol 6(3/4):349356 Watkins CB, Gunson AF, Forbes SK (1997) Reduction
Morishita M (2005a) Effect of bark-scraping, dormant of chilling injury in the sweet persimmon Fuyu dur-
spray of petroleum oil and applying pesticide in late ing storage by dry air heat treatments. Postharv Biol
spring on density of Japanese mealybug, Planococcus Technol 11:155164
kraunhiae (Kuwana), in persimmon [Japanese]. Ann
Rep Kansai Plant Prot Soc 47:123124
Fruit Crops: Passion Fruit
34
M. Mani

34.1 Species

Planococcus citri (Risso) was recorded on pas-


sion fruit in Queensland, Australia. Numbers of
P. citri were lowest in September, increasing to
peak populations in JanuaryJune (Murray
1978). Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) was
reported on passion fruit in Florida (Hodges
et al. 2005).

34.2 Natural Enemies

Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. was the most


abundant predator on P. citri in Australia.
Harmonia octomaculata (F.), Chrysopa sp. and
Oligochrysa lutea (Wlk.) were less common pas-
sion fruit mealybugs. Parasite activity was insig-
nicant on P. citri. Attack by a fungus similar to
Entomophthora fumosa caused up to 58.1 %
mortality of third instar nymphs and adults in a
period of high rainfall and humidity in the wet Mass of mealybugs on passion fruit
season in January (Murray 1978).

M. Mani (*)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 317


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_34
318 M. Mani

References vention and management. Proc Fla State Hortic Soc


118:215217
Murray DAH (1978) Population studies of the citrus
Hodges AC, Hodges GS, Wisler GC (2005) Exotic scale
mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso), and its natural
insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) and whiteies
enemies on passionfruit in south-eastern Queensland,
(Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Florida tropical fruits: an
Australia. Qld J Agric Anim Sci 35(2):139142
example of the vital role early detection in pest pre-
Fruit Crops: Apricot
35
M. Mani

35.1 Species 35.2 Damage

Pseudococcus maritumus (Ehrhorn) is a problem The damage caused to apricots is due to excretion
on apricot in the USA (Anonymous 1980). of honeydew by Ps. maritumus. Colonies are
Phenacoccus mespili (Sign.) is known to be a formed in the depression around the stem end of
pest of apricot in the Azerbaijan SSR, USSR the fruits, and honeydew produced run over sides
(Ibadova 1985). Phenacoccus aceris (Signoret) of apricots. The black smut fungus that grows in
is also known to attack all deciduous fruit and nut the honeydew gives the fruit an unsightly appear-
trees, including apricots in Nearctic and ance. In addition, the honeydew gives the fruit a
Palaearctic regions (Ben-Dov 1994). Ferrisia vir- reddish tint. As apricots are picked relatively
gata (Cockerell) is also known to attack apricots ripe, it is not possible to remove the honeydew by
in Egypt. the normal washing procedure. The fruit is not
suitable for fresh shipment, and processors of
unpeeled halves consider the contaminated fruit
as culls.

35.3 Seasonal Development

Pseudococcus maritimus on apricots over winter


act as crawlers within white cottony egg mass
deposit by adult females. These egg masses are
found on the trunk and main limbs of the tree in
protected places such as cracks and depressions
in the bark. During spring, shortly after the tree
blooms, the crawlers become active and leave
their overwintering quarters. Newly hatched
Pseudococcus maritumus mealybug crawlers are about 0.06 in. long, pink
to salmon colored, coated with a white powder
M. Mani (*) wax, and very mobile. The crawlers usually con-
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, gregate the base of the young shoots at this time,
Bangalore 560089, India apparently feeding on tender tissue. Sedentary
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 319


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_35
320 M. Mani

nymphs are pink to purple with waxy laments As dormant spray, horticultural mineral oil is rec-
giving them a whitish cast. Adult females resem- ommended at 12 gal/100 gal water (48
ble nymphs and are about 0.19 in. long and quite gal/a) + diazinon (Diazinon AG500) at 1 pint/100
mobile. Later in the season, mealybugs may pro- gal water (1.53 pints/a) for control of mealybug.
duce copious amounts of honeydew. They reach A prebloom spray application of insecticides
maturity by MayJune. Receptive females release diazinon (50 W) at 1 lb/100 gal water (4 lb/a) and
a pheromone to attract males. Adult males appear phosmet (70 W) at 0.751 lb/100 gal water (4.25
rst, mate with last instar nymphs or adult lb/a) is given before leaves begin to curl, and
females and die, and females deposit eggs in the before petal fall. Diazinon (50 W) at 1 lb/100 gal
cracks of the bark. The eggs hatch and crawlers water (4 lb/a) and imidacloprid (1.6 F) were rec-
of the second generation move to both foliage ommended at 2 oz/100 gal water (48 oz/a) is
and fruit during June and early July. It is at this recommended as petal fall spray for the control
time that the mealybugs colonize around the stem of mealybugs (Madsen and Mcnelly 1960).
end of the fruit. Apricots are usually harvested in
July, and after the fruit is picked, the mature,
mated females migrate to sheltered areas, lay References
eggs, and die in the egg sac. The eggs hatch in
September, but the crawlers remain within the Anonymous (1980) Pseudococcus maritimus [Distribution
map]. Distribution Maps of Plant Pests 1980. Map 404
old egg mass until the following spring (Madsen
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
and McNelly 1959). bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
ical distribution, host plants, biology, and economic
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
35.4 Management Ibadova SI (1985) The apple mealybug Phenacoccus mes-
pili (Sign.) and its natural enemies in the Apsheronskiy
Treatments timed to the spring emergence of Peninsula [Russian]. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk
crawlers were effective and were preferred to fall Azerbaidzhanskoi SSR. Biologicheskikh Nauk
1:3236
or winter sprays. Diazinon was found to be effec-
Madsen HF, McNelly LB (1959) Mealybug on apricot.
tive against the mealybug on apricots. Weekly Calif Agric 13:1314
sprays of horticultural oil, neem oil, and use of Madsen HF, McNelly LB (1960) Control of the grape
insecticidal soap work well against mealybugs. mealybug on apricots. J Econ Entomol 53(3):354357
Fruit Crops: Pistachio and Almond
36
M. Mani

36.1 Pistachio (Pistacia vera) 36.1.1 Damage

Gills mealybug Ferrisia gilli Gullan is a primary Mealybug feeding results in the production of
pest of pistachio in California. Mealybug infesta- large amounts of honeydew that acts as a sub-
tion causes a decrease in nut quality because of strate for black sooty mold. Stems, leaves, and
increased shell staining and possibly smaller ker- clusters in trees are often covered in honeydew
nel size. Mealybug populations are at their high- and sooty mold. Thick layers of sooty mold on
est at the time of harvest. Ferrisia gilli is a leaf surfaces reduce photosynthesis. Mealybugs
relatively large mealybug that feeds by sucking have a great afnity for feeding within the pis-
plant juices of almond in California. Mealybug tachio cluster. They use piercingsucking
control is achieved through a dormant or June mouthparts to suck out plant juices, extracting
application of buprofezin, which is highly effec- carbohydrates and other nutrients intended for
tive against immature stages and can reduce nut development. This causes a decrease in nut
mealybug populations in a manner that is rela- quality because of increased shell staining and
tively safe to predators and parasites. possibly smaller kernel size. During the late
Alternatively, chlorpyrifos provided excellent spring through harvest, mealybug is particu-
control when sprayed in the dormant season and larly found feeding within the cluster where
would likely do the same in season. Parasitoids they cause losses in quality and possibly yields.
include wasps in the genera Pseudaphycus, Harvesting is also affected when severe hull
Chrysoplatycerus and Anagyrus. These parasit- damage causes nuts to dry up and shrivel on
oid species have been shown to effectively reduce the tree.
Gills mealybug populations where pyrethrin-
based insecticide use is very limited.

M. Mani (*)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 321


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_36
322 M. Mani

Adult female mealybug Fruit infestation Mealybug infestation of nut


clusters

36.1.2 Seasonal Development

Gills mealybug has three generations per year in


California. After harvest, adult female mealybugs
migrate to the main tree scaffolds and trunk
where they aggregate and give the wood a white,
bearded appearance as if draped in cotton candy.
Then they produce crawlers that seek out pro-
tected places in cracks and crevices to overwin-
ter. During budbreak, the overwintering nymphs
migrate to the swelling buds and begin to feed.
They continue feeding at the interface between Aggregation of mealybugs on tree trunk
the previous years wood and the current years
growth until May, when the overwintering mealy- 36.1.3 Management
bugs reach maturity and move to the rachis.
Between late May and mid-June, the adult 36.1.3.1 Stopping the Spread
females give live birth to crawlers of the rst of Mealybug populations are at their highest at the
two in-season generations that feed on the pista- time of harvest. A lot of equipment is moving
chio hull. The rst generation is present from through orchards, and that equipment is typically
early June through mid-July and the second from moved locally from orchard to orchard and from
mid-July through harvest. Whereas the overwin- county to county. Growers and harvesters are to
tering generation has low survival rates through- be educated on turn to advice their equipment
out the winter, the two in-season generations are operators to recognize infested orchards and
noted for their exponential growth rates such that wash down the equipment prior to leaving
one mealybug per cluster in May can result in infested sites. Tarping loads coming from infested
hundreds of mealybugs per cluster at harvest. orchards are needed to keep the infested leaf
trash from blowing out during transport.

36.1.4 Cultural Control

There are no cultural controls known to affect the


density of Gills mealybug or the damage it
causes to pistachios. However, cultural controls
such as washing equipment (especially harvest
equipment) when leaving infested orchards is
essential for decreasing the rate of orchard-to-
orchard spread of this new pest.
Mealybugs on buds
36 Fruit Crops: Pistachio and Almond 323

36.1.5 Chemical Control 36.1.6 Biological Control

Monitoring of mealybugs on the trees is an Several species of predators and parasitoids can
important step to make treatment decisions. At suppress Gills mealybug densities. Predators
budbreak, search for mealybugs is to be done at include green lacewings and a small brown coc-
the bases of new buds on trees known to be previ- cinellid (ladybird) beetle whose larva mimics the
ously infested. Treatment decisions are to be appearance of a mealybug. Parasitoids include
made by determining the number of adult female wasps in the genera Pseudaphycus,
mealybugs per cluster in late May. An average of Chrysoplatycerus, and Anagyrus. These parasit-
three mealybugs per cluster in May is sufcient oid species have been shown to effectively reduce
to cause a 15 % reduction in the value of the crop Gills mealybug populations where pyrethrin-
at harvest. It is advised to look for mealybug based insecticide use is very limited.
infestations in fall after harvest, and mark areas
in the orchard where they occur so that their pop-
ulations can be monitored the following spring. If
adult females are found in clusters in May, a
treatment aimed at crawler emergence may be
warranted.
The best time to nd new mealybug infesta-
tions is the period from early fall through mid-
winter when populations are at their highest.
Before trees become dormant, it is advised to
look for sooty mold on leaves and for mealybugs
within the clusters. Once the leaves have fallen,
look for white aggregations of mealybugs on the
trunks and undersides of main scaffolds. If
mealybugs are found, mark and follow up on
these locations the following spring. Parasitized mealybug
The most effective timing for insecticides is
when most mealybugs are in the crawler stage of
the rst generation, which for the lower San
Joaquin Valley is around early to mid-June. Be
sure to monitor clusters to determine crawler
emergence. Applications later in the season are
more variable in effectiveness. Postharvest treat-
ments are not recommended because this is when
biological control is most active, no damage
occurs to the crop in winter, and there is already
high winter mealybug mortality. The insecticide
buprofezin 34.5 oz is very effective when used
while mealybugs are in the crawler stage of the
rst in-season generation. Acetamiprid 2.3
4.1 oz is effective against second-generation
crawlers in mid-to-late July. Predatory larva on the mealybug
324 M. Mani

36.2 Almond (Prunus dulcis)

Ferrisia gilli is a relatively large mealybug that


feeds by sucking plant juices of almond in
California. Feeding on almonds causes sufcient
stress to induce midsummer defoliation of trees.
Large amounts of honeydew, which acts as a sub-
strate for sooty mold, can also damage trees by
blackening the surfaces of leaves, and thereby
rendering them photosynthetically inactive. Due
to the rapid spread of this mealybug to numerous
counties in California, Drosicha dalbergiae
(Stebbing) has been wrongly reported as almond
mealybug in Kashmir, India (Shaheen et al.
Aggregation of mealybugs on the trunk of almond
2014).
F. gilli primarily overwinters in the immature
stages in cracks and crevices under bark on the
trunk and main scaffolds of the tree. Smaller
numbers were also found hiding underneath the 36.2.2 Biological Control
bark of limbs and underneath bud scales.
Mealybugs appeared to be in the second instar Biological control was the primary cause of the
stage. The percentage of spurs infested with mealybug disappearance. Bark samples from the
mealybugs started to decrease from January trunk during the winter showed a combination of
through the rst of March. During this time, the parasitoids and predators. These included at least
mealybugs were still in their overwintering sites two species of parasitoid wasps, lacewing larvae,
under bark on the trunk and other parts of the and a predatory beetle. The two species of wasps
tree. Sometime during the early weeks of March, were reared repeated times from mealybug mum-
the mealybugs migrated out of their overwinter- mies from October 2004 through spring 2005.
ing sites, resulting in 40 % of the spurs being Parasitoids appear to overwinter inside mealybug
infested with at least one mealybug on the 18 mummies on the bark of the tree, and then emerge
March evaluation date. At this time, most mealy- as temperatures warm up in the spring. Parasitoids
bugs were medium-sized nymphs. After 18 include wasps in the genera Pseudaphycus,
March, mealybug populations began to decrease Chrysoplatycerus, and Anagyrus and have been
as mealybugs became more evenly distributed in shown to effectively reduce Gills mealybug pop-
the tree, and the mealybug populations were ulations on almondgrape crop systems where
reduced by predation, parasitism, and other natu- pyrethrin-based insecticide use is very limited.
ral causes of mortality. By late June and early They found the mealybugs on their own (indicat-
July, mealybugs had developed into the adult ing that they are something already established),
stage and began to reproduce. Soon thereafter, that they survive the winter, and that each parasit-
and without the inuences of any insecticides, oid is capable of producing multiple offspring
the mealybug populations disappeared such that from each mealybug. The predatory beetle found
we did not nd a single mealybug during the was a small, mottled brown coccinelid. Larval
remainder of the year. stages mimic mealybugs due to white brous
36 Fruit Crops: Pistachio and Almond 325

secretions that cover their bodies. The California control is achieved through a dormant or June
gray ant (eld ant) also interacts heavily with F. application of buprofezin, which is highly effec-
gilli. Field ants are attracted to mealybugs and tive against immature stages and can reduce
were often found in close association with them. mealybug populations in a manner that is rela-
It is likely that predation on the crawler stages tively safe to predators and parasites.
that appeared in mid-June could explain the Alternatively, chlorpyrifos provided excellent
abrupt disappearance of the mealybugs for the control when sprayed in the dormant season and
remainder of the season, especially since there would likely do the same during in-season.
were lots of eld ants, no insecticides were used, Dormant treatments, however, would be pre-
and there were no mealybug mummies left ferred since they should be relatively safe to para-
behind that would indicate populations were sitoids due to their state of dormancy inside of
reduced through parasitism. mealybug mummies.

36.2.3 Chemical Control References

Trees treated with chlorpyriphos were the only Gullan PJ, Downie DA, Steffan SA (2003) A new pest
species of the mealybug genus Ferrisia Fullaway
trees to have signicant reductions compared to
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from the United States.
the untreated control. During April and May, Ann Entomol Soc Am 96:723737
once overwintering mealybugs had molted, it Shaheen G, Zahoor B, Ahmad AS (2014) Management of
resulted in an excellent control of the pest by almond mealybug, Drosicha dalbergiae (Stebbing) by
chemical intervention. Ann Plant Prot Sci
buprofezin, followed by chlorpyriphos. Mealybug
22(1):2226
Fruit Crops: Strawberry
37
M. Mani

37.1 Species affected with the viral disease. The symptoms


not only occur on younger leaves of small, cir-
The mealybugs Pseudococcus viburni (Maskell) cular to irregularly shaped translucent spots
and Heliococcus bohemicus Sulc are known to with more intensely chlorotic central portions,
attack strawberries in Southern France (Kreiter but also in the unevenly chlorotic character and
et al. 2004; 2005). Strawberries are known to be malformation of older leaves and in the ulti-
damaged by Planococcus citri (Risso) in mate general dwarng of heavily infested
Florida. Mealybugs (Pseudococcus spp.) have plants. The roots of strawberry plants were
been shown to be primarily responsible for known to be infested with the mealybug
symptoms which for a number of years have Rhizoecus kondonis (Kuwana) in California
been appearing on strawberry plants grown in (McKenzie 1967). Puto pilosellae (Sulc) is
the greenhouse, and which in certain respects known to infest strawberries in Central Europe
bear a strong resemblance to those of plants (Kosztarab and Kozar 1988).

Pseudococcus viburni on strawberry C. montrouzieri on Ps. viburni

M. Mani (*)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 327


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_37
328 M. Mani

37.2 Management Kreiter P, Graille G, Thaon M, Lanza R, Tamonte M,


Germain C, Germain JF, Hantzberg H (2004)
Biological control against two mealybugs, newly pres-
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri was used to control ent on Strawberries in Southern France. [French].
the mealybugs Pseudococcus viburni and Phytoma 568:3840
Heliococcus bohemicus on strawberries in Kreiter P, Delvare G, Giuge L, Thaon M, Viaut M (2005)
First inventory of the natural enemies of Pseudococcus
Southern France (Kreiter et al. 2004).
viburni (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae). [French]. Bull
Soc Entomol Fr 110(2):161164
McKenzie HL (1967) Mealybugs of California. University
References of California Press, Berkeley, 525 p

Kosztarab M, Kozar M (1988) Scale insects of Central


Europe. Akdeiai Kiado, Budapest, 456 p
Fruit Crops: Grapevine
38
M. Mani and U. Amala

Mealybugs have been reported as serious pests in and Planococcoides robustus sp.n. (Ezzat and
North America, South America, Canada, Mexico, McConnell) in Karnataka in 1976 (Puttarudraiah
USSR, France, South Africa, Australia, Italy, and Murthy 1976). Prior to 1980, occasional
New Zealand, Chile, Middle East countries, etc. losses occurred as a result of localized infesta-
(Table 38.1). Economic losses resulting from tion, and usually disappeared in the following
mealybug infestations on grapes have dramati- year. But in the early 1980s, economic losses on
cally increased in India. As many as seven spe- grapes in Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra,
cies are known to attack grapevine in India (Mani Karnataka and to some extent in Tamil Nadu led
et al. 2008). Mealybugs are considered to be the to the rediscovery of pink hibiscus mealybug,
most important pests of grapevine in India par- which was also reported on a wide range of host
ticularly in Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil plants in peninsular India. From the mid-1980s
Nadu and Karnataka. onwards, mealybugs have become persistent
Historical perview on mealybugs in India pests in peninsular India (Satyanarayana 1981;
that the pink hibiscus mealybug Maoconellicoccus Mani 1986; Reddy and Narayana 1986; Azam
hirsutus (Green) as Phenacoccus hirsutus 1983; Srinivasan 1987). Extensive use of insecti-
(Green) was rst reported on grapes in 1919 cides in vineyards might have resulted in the out-
(Fletcher 1919, 1923), spherical mealybug break of mealybugs in the late 1980s (Manjunath
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) as Pseudococcus 1985). Grape production is often adversely
corymbatus (Green) in 1932 (Fletcher 1932) and affected due to the mealybugs, with the extent of
also as Pseudococcus lamentosus (Cockerell) in damage being as much as 90 % in extreme cases.
Punjab in 1946 (Anonymous 1946), striped Apparently, it could be due to the disruption of
mealybug Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) in Tamil natural enemies of mealybugs by broad-spectrum
Nadu in 1958 (Raman 1958), N. viridis in 1965 insecticides. In fact, mealybug infestation
(Subba Rao et al. 1965) and Pseudococcus sp. in increased with the increased use of insecticides,
Andhra Pradesh in 1974 (Tejkumar et al. 1977) particularly organophosphates.

M. Mani (*) U. Amala


Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 329


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_38
330 M. Mani and U. Amala

Table 38.1 Mealybug species recorded on grapevine in different regions of the world
Species Region Reference
Asterococcus muratae (Kuw.) USA Lambdin (1983)
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Ckll.) Brazil Daane et al. (2012)
India Mani (1986)
Ferrisia malvastra (McDaniel) S. Africa Walton and Pringle (2004); Iordanou (1974)
Argentina Tryapitzyn and Tryapitzyn (1999)
Ferrisia gilli (Gullan) USA Gullan et al. (2003)
Geococcus coffeae (Green) Ben-Dov (1994)
Heliococcus bohemicus (ulc.) Hungary Jakab and Szendrey (1989)
Italy Camporese (1994)
France, Germany Sforza et al. (2003)
Switzerland Kozar et al. (1994)
Macoonellicoccus hirsutus (Green) India Reddy and Narayana (1986)
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) India Mani (1986)
Peliococcus turanicus (Kritshenko) Palaearctic region Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus aceris (Sign.) Italy Jablonowski (1917)
Phenacoccus hystrix (Baer) Germany Wunn (1928); Zillig and Neimeyer (1929)
Phenacoccus madeirensis (Green) Yemen Marotta et al. (2001)
Phenacoccus solani (Ferris) S. Africa Walton and Pringle (2004); Iordanou (1974)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Egypt Bodenheimer (1944)
France Bonnemaison (1962)
Hungary Anonymous (1917)
Italy Jablonowski (1917)
Israel Avidov and Swirski (1950)
Spain Ruiz Castro (1938); Cabaleiro and Segura (1997)
S. Africa Joubert (1943)
Turkey Aykac and Erguder (1972)
UK Brotherston (1914)
USA
California Golino et al. (2002)
USSR Pintz (1932); Chochiya (1941); Rozanov and
Loseva (1963); Niyazov (1969); Kurdyukov and
Alan (1973)
Brazil Morandi Filho et al. (2007); Cabaleiro and
Segura (1997)
Chile Gonzalez (2003); Artigas (1994)
Australia CSIRO (2001)
Planococcus cus (Sign.) France Panis and Trevillot (1975)
Italy Transfaglia (1976); Forte et al. (2008)
S. Africa Whitehead (1961); Walton and Pringle (2004b)
USSR Dantsig (1977)
Yemen Marotta et al. (2001)
Iran
Iraq, Israel, Lebanon,
Libya, Egypt
Tunisia Mahfoudhi and Dhouibi (2009)
Turkey Kaydan and Klncer (2005)
(continued)
38 Fruit Crops: Grapevine 331

Table 38.1 (continued)


Species Region Reference
Brazil Foldi and Kozar (2006)
Argentina Cordo et al. (2004); Manuel de Borbon et al.
2004)
California Gutierrez et al. (2008); Daane et al. (2011)
Mexico Gutierrez et al. (2008); Daane et al. (2011)
Uruguay Willink et al. (1997)
Chile Gonzalez (2003)
Transcaucasus Rzaeva (1985)
Apsheronskiy Ibadova (1985)
Peninsula
Planococcus vitis (Nied.) Argentina Stanzin (1916)
Egypt El Sayed et al. (1962)
France Bernard (1914)
Germany Thiem (1925)
Italy Lotrionte (1920)
Israel Berlinger (1977)
S. Africa Niedielski (1969)
USSR Afanassiev (1915)
Planococcus kraunhiae (Kuw.) Japan Shraiwa (1935)
Planococcus bakeri (Essig.) California Flebut (1922)
Planococcus lilacinus (Cockrell) India Williams (2004)
Planococcus minor (Maskell) India Williams (2004)
Planococcoides robustus (Ezzat and India, Bangladesh, Williams (2004)
McConnel) Pakistan
Pseudococcus cryptus (Hempel) Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus comstocki (Kuw.) USA Flaherty et al. (1976)
Pseudococcus longispinus (TarToz.); Australia De Castella and French (1929); CSIRO (2001)
P. adonidum (L.) New Zealand Cox (1977); Charles (1981)
S. Africa Joubert (1943); Walton and Pringle (2004b);
Iordanou (1974)
UK Brotherston (1914)
USSR Fedorov (1926)
Chile Gonzalez (2003); Artigas (1994)
California Golino et al. (2002); Daane et al. (2008a)
Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrh.) S. Africa Joubert (1943)
Chile Gonzalez (1982); Gonzalez (2003)
California Frick (1952); Flaherty et al. (1976); Golino et al.
(2002)
Pseudococcus viburni (Sign.) New Zealand Fisher (1983); Cottier and Jacks (1952); Daane
et al. (2007)
Pseudococcus obscurus (Essig.) Chile Artigas (1994); Gonzalez (2003)
South Africa Myburg et al. (1973); Walton and Pringle (2004);
Iordanou (1974)
Australia CSIRO (2001)
California Golino et al. (2002); Daane et al. (2008a)
Australia Gullan (2000)
Rastrococcus iceryoides (Green) Ben-Dov (1994)
Rhizoecus falcifer (Kunkell) USA
Xenococcus annandalei (Silvestri) India Williams (2004)
332 M. Mani and U. Amala

In the mid-1990s, the spherical mealybug leaves and shoot tips. As the mealybugs feed,
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) was also reported they excrete carbohydrate-rich honeydew that
to cause occasional losses in some vineyards in also serves as a substrate for the growth of sooty
South India. A localized infestation of mould on leaves, shoots and bunches. Sooty
Xenococcus annandalei (Silvestri) in 1996 was mould inhibits photosynthesis and affects the
also reported in North Bangalore (Rajagopal growth and development of vine. Second, it
et al. 1997) and Planococcus minor (Maskell) adversely affects the fermentation process and
(Planococcus pacicus (Cox) in Punjab (Batra subsequently taints the wine. The damage pro-
et al. 1987). But in mid-2000, citrus mealybug duced by mealybugs is due to the presence of
Planococcus citri (Risso) was reported to cause one or more of the following: the cottony ovi-
severe losses in Maharashtra and Karnataka par- sac, eggs, nymphs, adults, honeydew or sooty
allel to M. hirsutus (Mani and Kulkarni 2007). mould. Honeydew often drips onto the fruit
Due to awareness on the use of harmful broad- from the mealybugs feeding on the foliage
spectrum insecticides by farmers, increased use above the clusters. Honeydew is colourless and
of selective chemicals and biopesticides, grape syrupy when rst exuded; it later becomes
mealybug populations decreased noticeably in darker because of the sooty mould. Grape ber-
late 2000 in India. Although individual vineyards ries in an infested bunch do not develop nor-
suffered losses due to mealybugs, the problem mally and are shrivelled. Bunches having sooty
became considerably less severe, and in many mould-coated berries will be unsightly, thereby
cases treatments were reduced or eliminated. losing its market value due to cosmetic damage
Still, individual vineyards suffer from mealy- to the grape clusters; they are poor in quality
bugs, which require treatments. and unt for human consumption. The grape
mealybug alone caused 50100 % yield losses
in the eld (Azam 1983). The pest attack weak-
38.1 Damage ens the grown-up vines. The mere presence of
mealybug colonies and sooty mould causes cos-
Mealybugs are phloem feeders that use long, metic damage to grape cluster. In case of severe
slender mouthparts to suck the sap from the mealybug infestation, young vines often die.
trunk, cordons, buds, spurs, aerial roots, leaves, Difference in the amount of damage caused by
shoots, nodes, ower panicles and bunches. each species is often related to population size,
Infestation of the growing point, especially with preferred feeding locations and temperature
the pink mealybug, results in malformation of tolerances.

Symptoms of Mealybug Damage

P. citri leaf damage Pink mealybug shoot damage Mealybugs on nodes


38 Fruit Crops: Grapevine 333

Spherical mealybug egg Pink mealybugs Mealybugs on aerial roots


mass on the bark of the trunk

Bunch damage Honeydew on berries

Honeydew can be dissolved by light rain and roots; and the affected vines show reduced
will dry in warm temperatures; however, when vigour, shortening of fruit-bearing canes and
infestations are very severe, it can accumulate to reduction in size of fruit bunches and yield.
form a hard, wax-like layer that covers the Like most other grape pests, grape mealybugs
infested plant material and results in defoliation, prefer vigorous vines. Thus, vines most likely to
and repeated annual infestations result in vine be infested are outside rows, since these are nor-
death. Fruit clusters in direct contact with spurs mally the most vigorous. Weak vines may har-
or trunk are more likely to be damaged. bour mealybugs, but heavy populations are
Generally, the table grapes suffer very heavily normally found mainly on fairly vigorous vines.
in comparison with raisin and wine grapes. The In general, the mealybug infestations are con-
table grape vineyards are usually more easily ned to few vines, while others are clean. But
infested because of the greater use of pesticides when there is outbreak, all the vines are likely to
to ensure clean fruits. This sometimes interferes be infested. Many a time, the infestation is local-
with natural control factors. Area under wine ized. In a given area, one vineyard may be heav-
grapes has started increasing recently in India. ily infested while many others may be completely
The mealybug also poses a serious threat to free from mealybugs under the same conditions.
wine grapes. It is very difcult to process the Grape bunches that touch old wood have signi-
fruits for raisin and wine if the bunches are cantly higher damage and mealybug densities.
heavily infested with mealybugs. The root The majority of mealybugs are always found in
mealybugs Xenococcus annandalei and protected locations (under the bark of the trunk,
Planococcoides robustus in India also cause spurs or canes), indicating the need for chemical
damage occasionally by sucking the sap from or biological controls that can penetrate these
334 M. Mani and U. Amala

refugia (Chris and Kent 2001). Mealybugs are mealybug population in JulyAugust (Mani
also known to transmit Grapevine-leafroll- 1986; Balikai 1999b).
associated virus (GLRaV) on grapevine in many The seasonal incidence of mealybug was
countries. Recently, the diseases have been found expressed in terms of standard weeks. A popula-
damaging wine grapes in peninsular India. The tion of 25.0 colonies per vine was observed dur-
vine mealybug as a vector of GLRaV is yet to be ing the 14th standard week, and thereafter it
established in India. declined and reached to a minimum of 7.4 colo-
nies during the 22nd standard week due to April
pruning effect. From the 24th standard week,
38.2 Seasonal Development again it started increasing and reached to a peak
during the 36th standard week (14.5 colonies/
In India, the mealybug occurs on the grapevine vine). From the 39th standard week, it again
throughout the year. Seasonal development of started declining and reached to a minimum of
mealybugs depends on the phenology of the crop. 5.0 colonies during the 44th standard week due to
Development of mealybug population can be September pruning effect and once again started
related to vine development. After pruning in increasing steadily in the fruiting season and
SeptemberOctober (fruit pruning), the mealy- reached a peak of 32.4 colonies per vine during
bugs remain low on the trunk, cordons and stem the 10th standard week (Katke 2008) (Fig. 38.2).
up to the rst fortnight of December. In general, A similar type of seasonal development of M.
the mealybug population starts increasing from hirsutus was observed on grapes in Andhra
mid-December onwards. During January, they Pradesh (Azam, 1983: Babu and Azam 1987) and
migrate from the trunk, cordons and shoots to also in Maharashtra (Anonymous 1992; Koli
ower panicles and then developing berries. It 2003). The development of other important
attains its peak population before the harvest of mealybugs like Planococcus citri and
bunches during MarchApril. The grapevine is Nipaecoccus viridis also follows a similar pattern
pruned usually in AprilMay (foundation prun- in south India.
ing) (Fig. 38.1). Mealybugs remain on the leaves, Fletcher (1919) reported that M. hirsutus had
stem and trunk from April to September. The ten generations per year in India. The number of
mealybug population is usually low from June to generations of the mealybug varies with the spe-
September coinciding with the rainy season. In cies, locality and climatic factors. There is also
the absence of rains, there is a sudden spurt in the variation in seasonal feeding, location and

500
Number of mealybugs / plant

450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep

Seasonal incidence of grape mealybugs

Fig. 38.1 Seasonal Incidence of grape mealybugs in India


38 Fruit Crops: Grapevine 335

Fig. 38.2 Seasonal incidence of grape mealybug in Bijapur

movement on the vine among species and within 38.3 Varietal Susceptibility
species depending on regional temperatures and
vineyard management practices. There is no dia- Grape varieties that produce clusters close to the
pause, and slow development may occur during base of shoots so that the fruit touches the old
the winter months under south Indian conditions. wood are likely to have more heavily infested
Temperature is the driving force for mealybug clusters than varieties where clusters hang more
development (e.g., Chong et al. 2008), although freely. Early-maturing varieties are much less
development times and temperature thresholds likely to have serious fruit damage than the late-
differ among the species. Heavy sporadic rains maturing varieties. Cane-pruned varieties are a
and cool temperatures of less than 20 C result in little less likely to be infested seriously than spur-
temporary reduction in the mealybug population. pruned canes. Among commercial grape variet-
The pest population build-up coincides with high ies, none was found free from its attack. Seedless
temperature of 3040 C, low humidity (less than cultivars with tight lling of the clusters have
40 %) and berry development. more infestation than the seeded and loosely
The population is low in winter and rainy lled clusters. Raman (1958) observed more inci-
seasons and higher in summer months (Reddy dences of mealybugs in Pachadraksha (Bhokri)
and Narayana 1986; Babu and Azam 1987; and Thomspon in seedless ones but less incidence
Mani and Thontadarya 1987a, b; Manjunath in Black Prince, Phakdi, Anab-e-Shahi and
1985). There was a highly signicant positive Bangalore Blue. More or less incidence of mealy-
correlation of maximum and minimum tempera- bug in different varieties could also be a chance
ture and highly signicant negative correlation factor.
of morning and evening relative humidity and
non-signicant negative correlation of rainfall
with mealybug population in vineyards (Mani 38.4 Monitoring
and Thontadarya 1987a, b; Koli 2003). They
manage to survive under loose bark, feeding at The control strategy of this pest requires an effec-
bases of spurs, callus tissue at the site of girdles tive monitoring of the population dynamics,
in the off season. which is affected by various abiotic and biotic
336 M. Mani and U. Amala

factors. There are no dened effective methods to 38.5 Management


visually monitor the vineyards. Most of the
mealybugs have a clumped distribution pattern Mealybugs are hard-to-kill pests on several crop
within the vineyard, often being found on a small plants. Good decision to manage the grape
percentage of vines initially. Many mealybugs mealybugs depends on the knowledge about pre-
are present under the bark, on the leaves. Presence vious history of mealybug damage in any given
of ants is the indication of the sucking pests vineyard. Sometimes, infestations develop rap-
including the mealybugs that are closely associ- idly with little warning. Sound decisions also
ated with ants. Second, the honeydew, which is depend on close monitoring of potentially dam-
clear, sticky, glistening in appearance, is depos- aging populations.
ited in small drops. Later, as the mealybugs grow, Prevention is better than cure. This principle is
droplets of honeydew become larger and sooty highly applicable in the management of grape
mould begins to grow on the honeydew. Early mealybugs. Chemical control at crawler stage
detection is important. The suggested procedure (mobile) could be appropriate, as they do not
is to examine the leaves and trunk of grapevine have waxy coating and are exposed during their
plants in the areas that are likely to be infested migration. However, they are slow in their move-
based on previous experience. ment and almost stationary on the vines in the
Mealybug reproduction can be quite variable. later stages. Since the adult bugs hibernate in the
For some vineyard mealybugs, mating may be bark, cervices and collar region of the vines,
observed, but not mandatory always. In those mechanical control could be quite effective as
cases of sexual reproduction, a specic faster they are more amenable for mechanical and bio-
sampling method is the use of sticky traps baited logical control.
with sex pheromone to lure in and trap the adult Repeated insecticide use also adversely affects
winged males. Researchers have shown that trap the mealybug natural enemies (Walton and
counts can be used to predict damage in vine- Pringle 1999). For these reasons, effective
yards (Walton et al. 2004) and, in some instances, species-specic work and environmentally safe
population density (Francis et al. 2007). It has control tools to work in combination with or as
long been known that sexually mature female on alternative to insecticide programme need to
mealybugs may emit a sex pheromone to attract be developed (Daane et al. 2008b).
the winged adult male mealybugs (Rotundo and Biological control is the only answer for adult
Tremblay 1972; Rotundo et al. 1979) and these mealybugs as they develop the waxy coating. In
pheromones can be synthesized and used in the the chemical control programme, specic insecti-
eld to attract males, as was shown with P. citri cides that only kill mealybug crawlers or early-
(Bierlleonhardt et al. 1981; Rotundo and instar nymphs, but not their predators, should be
Tremblay 1982). Numerous sex pheromones included. Cultural, mechanical, biological and
have recently been identied in the mealybugs chemical methods of control have to be inte-
including M. hirsutus and P. citri (Zhang et al. grated to manage the mealybug population, thus
2004) and are being tested; and management preventing the loss caused by mealybugs.
tools to detect vineyard mealybug populations
have been devised. Some of these synthetic sex
pheromones are commercially available; how- 38.5.1 Cultural Control
ever, both conventional sampling and pheromone
trapping have advantages and disadvantages and, A number of cultural controls are practised,
for that reason, both methods should be used. which vary greatly among the regions, and a few
38 Fruit Crops: Grapevine 337

have been sufciently evaluated. Compact 38.5.2 Mechanical Control


bunches are likely to get heavily damaged.
Thinning of fruits is followed to remove the clus- Debarking and rubbing the vine stems with a stiff
ters that come in direct contact with the trunk or cloth soon after October pruning and pasting
cordon. Removal of leaves covering the bunches them with a mixture of copper oxychloride and
to prevent the movement of mealybugs from leaf chlorpyriphos can minimize the mealybug popu-
to bunches is necessary. Similarly, trellising sys- lation. Debarking to remove the mealybugs alone
tems for cane-pruned cultivars result in grape is known to reduce 40 % damage in the fruiting
clusters that hang away from the trunk and cor- season. Chemicals applied without debarking do
dons, and this reduces cluster infestation. Harvest not control the mealybugs effectively. Application
date also has an impact on the mealybug infesta- of a sticky substance tacktrap, containing 76 %
tion levels, which can be higher in cultivars har- polyisobutylene, to the shoot on either side of the
vested later in the season because of greater cluster peduncle to a length of 5 cm, was found to
exposure time to the later mealybug broods. reduce the mealybug infestation by 50 %.
Early pruning of grapes in August-September in Another sticky material, bird tangle foot, was
India helps them to escape from the mealybug known to reduce the percentage of infested
attack in the fruit season coinciding with the win- bunches from 30.5 to 14.5 (Reddy and Narayana
ter month, December. Removal of remaining 1986). These sticky materials prevented the
mealybug-infested fruits after harvesting helps to crawlers of mealybug reaching the bunch.
reduce the population of mealybugs. Farmers
heap the pruned materials infested with mealy-
bugs near the grape gardens for fuel purposes. 38.5.3 Chemical Control
After drying, mealybugs migrate from the pruned
materials to the main plants. Then all the pruned Control measures must be applied when the
materials from mealybug-infested gardens are mealybugs are small, to kill a high proportion of
collected and destructed in April/May and again them. If the treatment is delayed, the percentage
in October. Overly vigorous vines can increase of reduction becomes smaller and smaller. Once
mealybug populations in two ways. First, excess half grown, controls are not believed worth
nitrogen has been shown to increase the size of applying. The majority of mealybugs are always
mealybug females and the number of eggs in found in protected locations (under the bark of
each ovisac. Second, the increased foliage asso- the trunk, spurs or canes), indicating the need for
ciated with overly vigorous vines provides better chemicals that can penetrate these refugia.
shelter for mealybugs by reducing temperatures Historically, pesticides have been a large part
inside the vine-leaf canopy and may reduce the of vine mealybug control. Early programmes
amount of applied foliar insecticide that reaches included potassium cyanide, sodium cyanide and
the mealybug. Hence, proper irrigation schedul- sulphur fumigation (Nougaret 1920; Shak and
ing and nutrient application are to be done for Husni 1939), which gave way to the chlorinated
maintaining the required growth at least not to hydrocarbons (e.g., dichlorodiphenyltrichloro-
increase the mealybug population. Weedy vine- ethane (DDT)) and organophosphates (e.g., para-
yards are most likely to contain more mealybugs. thion) from the 1940s to the 1990s (Frick 1952;
Hence, weeds and alternate host plants acting as Tranfaglia and Viggiani 1981; Grimes and Cone
a source of mealybugs inside and nearby outside 1985b). These materials were effective; for
the vineyard should be removed. example, rates as low as 48 g (a.i.) per ha of ethyl
338 M. Mani and U. Amala

parathion provided grape-mealybug control susceptible than the larger mealybugs. This is
(Frick 1952). Eventually, these materials became especially true for insecticides with a short resid-
less effective (Flaherty et al. 1982) and many ual period. Most research, therefore, has been
were ultimately banned from use. aimed at proper application timing and develop-
Many organophosphates are still effectively ing materials with better penetration into the
used (Gonzalez et al. 2001; Walton and Pringle mealybugs protected habitats. Dormant season
2001; Sazo et al. 2008). Newer materials, with or early spring application takes advantage of the
more novel modes of action, have also gained leaess vine, but mealybugs are in more pro-
popularity and include neonicotenoids, insect- tected locations. Applications with systemic
growth regulators, botanicals and biosynthesis materials near bloom are often used as the insec-
inhibitors (Daane et al. 2006; Sunitha et al. 2009; ticide moves out quickly to the leaves. After
Lo and Walker 2010). A major difference bloom, foliar materials should be applied beneath
between the older and new materials is coverage. the leaf canopy and aimed towards the grape
As mentioned, a portion of the mealybug popula- clusters and interior canes. In addition to the pos-
tion is often under the bark and, for some species, sibility of berry spotting, fresh market table
on the vine roots. Many of the older foliar sprays grapes possess a dull haze or dust on the skin,
do not effectively contact and kill mealybugs in termed bloom and the use of some insecticides
these more protected locations. The more novel can remove the bloom and lower the crop value.
materials have systemic properties, applied either Nevertheless, insecticides are the primary control
through the irrigation system or as a foliar. For tool for the mealybug control. Chemicals are to
organic or sustainable farming programmes, be applied through soil or can be sprayed to check
neem, light mineral oils, lime sulphur, citrus the mealybug populations.
products and fatty acid soaps have been used, but
these products have provided mixed results 38.5.3.1 Foliar Applications
(Srinivas et al. 2007). It is the most common method of applying insec-
Another historical difference is that the earlier ticides to control the mealybugs. Chemicals are
materials were often broad spectrum and killed effective if the sprays are applied when the mealy-
more than just the targeted mealybugs. Flaherty bugs are in the dispersive crawler stage and when
et al. (1982) stated that extensive use of DDT and the food plant affords the least shelter. Treatment
other synthetic insecticides to control leafhop- before the bud-burst stage and again after ower-
pers, etc. apparently disrupted the natural control ing reduces the mealybug population below the
of grape mealybugs. Other researchers have since economic threshold. Sprays of methidathion and
discussed the impact of broad-spectrum insecti- dimethoate against Pseudococcus maritimus
cides on mealybug natural enemies (e.g., Mani (Ehrh.) on grapevines (of the Thompson seedless
1986; Walton and Pringle 2001; Mgocheki and variety) in California resulted in 100 % control
Addison 2009). The cosmopolitan goal of man- (AliNiazee and Stafford 1972). The best control
aging vineyards with fewer broad-spectrum pes- of P. citri on grapevines was obtained with
ticides along with the development of resistance dimethoate, malathion or trichlormetaphos all at
to common pesticides (Flaherty et al. 1982; 0.2 % (Kurdyukov and Alan 1973). Three sprays
Charles et al. 1993) has fuelled the use of more of 0.075 % dichlorvos for controlling mealybugs
novel materials and research to improve mealy- (Pseudococcus sp.) on table grapes were applied.
bug controls. The rst was applied seven days before and the
For most materials, application timing is criti- second was 7 days after the beginning of harvest;
cal (Daane et al. 2012). Control measures are to the third spray 2 weeks later enhanced control
be taken at bud-burst stage, if any mealybugs are (Swart and Barnes 1975).
found during the previous harvesting. Exposed Currently, in North America, insecticide pro-
mealybugs are more easily killed than those grammes are based on the use of one or more of
under the bark, and the smaller stages are more the following insecticides: imidacloprid (a neo-
38 Fruit Crops: Grapevine 339

nicotinoid applied as a systemic near-bloom lowest mealybug population with increased cost-
time), buprofezin (an insect-growth regulator to-benet ratio (Biradar et al. 2006). Methomyl
applied as a foliar in late spring or early summer), @ 500800 g a.i/ha was found to be very effec-
acetamiprid (a foliar-applied neonicotinoid tive and gave high returns (Raguraman and
applied from late spring to harvest), clothianidin Premalatha 2006).
(a third-generation neonicotinoid applied as
either a foliar or systemic from late spring to har- 38.5.3.2 Dipping of Grape Bunches
vest), spirotetramat (a tetramic acid that acts as a Dipping of grape bunches for two minutes in any
lipid biosynthesis inhibitor and is applied from one of the insecticides, namely phosalone (2
late spring to early summer, or as post harvest) mL/L), monocrotophos (1.25 mL/L) or dichlor-
and chlorpyriphos (an organophosphate that is vos (mL/L) mixed with 25 g/L of sh-oil soap,
still used as a delayed dormant or post-harvest was highly effective in controlling mealybugs on
application) (Bentley et al. 2008). Prothiophos at bunches. Dipping in insecticide solution mixed
30 g/100 L or 1 mL/L afforded very effective with sh-oil rosin soap resulted in the scorching
control of the mealybugs throughout the season of berries at the blossom end due to the accumu-
(Prince and Fisher 1982). In the United States, lation of the mixture, but spraying was safe.
foliar application of buprofezin and chlorpyri- Though efcacy of insecticides was more by dip-
phos brought 82.7 and 85.0 % reduction in clus- ping than spraying with dichlorvos, both the
ter damage. Buprofezin is less expensive and methods of application were equally effective
provides excellent control. It is an insect-growth (Reddy and Narayana 1986).
regulator, most effective against smaller mealy-
bugs undergoing insect moults (Daane et al. 38.5.3.3 Soil Drenching
2008b). In India, dichlorvos was the most com- Chemigation (application of chemicals through
monly recommended chemical against mealy- irrigation) is an environmentally safe and the
bugs (FIP 1982). Foliar application of buprofezin most effective to control mealybugs. Imidacloprid,
at 1125 ml/ha reduced the nymphal and adult a systemic transluminar insecticide and also thio-
populations and bunch infestation of M. hirsutus methoxam (applied through the irrigation water
and increased the fruit yield (Muthukrishnan and taken by the vine roots), has been used in
et al. 2005). Buprofezin 25 SC @ 1125 ml/ha several countries and excellent control of mealy-
along with sh-oil rosin soap @ 3125 g/ha fur- bug has been obtained for a longer time.
ther improved the control of mealybugs on Imidacloprid provides greatest reduction of
grapes. Application of buprofezin does not affect 9093 % in cluster damage when applied through
the locally occurring natural enemies of vine drip irrigation (Daane et al. 2008b). In the drip-
mealybugs in India. Three sprays commencing irrigated vineyards, a four to six pretreatment
from the rst fortnight of January and subsequent irrigation prepares the soil; imidacloprid is then
sprays applied at ten days interval with dimetho- applied through irrigation system, and 6- to 8-h
ate 30 EC at 1.7 mL + sh-oil rosin soap at 5 g/L post-treatment irrigation is used to move the
also gave the highest protection from mealybugs insecticide in the root zone. Single application of
(Katke 2008). Application of spirotetramat 6 imidacloprid in spring through drip irrigation
.oz/acre + adjuvant (Vintre 0.25 %v/v) and 44 systems at rates of 0.75 g a.i. or higher per plant
.oz/acre (spray volume 137 gal/ac) were able to is known to reduce the mealybug abundance by
reduce the bunch infestation with mealybugs to 3 more than 99 % during the entire season and even
% and there was little to no honeydew in that for two seasons providing population pressures
treatment. Vintre dissolves mealybug-excreted remain low (Patricia Larrain 1999; Lo and Walker
wax to improve pesticide penetration, knock- 2011; Fu Castillo et al. 2004; Mansour et al.
down and control, deep within bark crevices. 2010; Mani et al. 2008). Imidacloprid provides
Diafenthiuron @ 8001600 g/ha recorded the 3060 % reduction in cluster damage when
340 M. Mani and U. Amala

applied through furrow irrigation (Daane et al. Table 38.2 List of insecticides recommended to control
mealybugs
2008a, b, c). In the furrow method, the vineyards
are prepared by ploughing a furrow area to Chemical Reference
expose the surface roots, followed by 1-day Buprofezin Muthukrishnan et al. (2005);
pretreatment irrigation. Imidacloprid is applied Mani et al. (2008); Bentley
et al. (2008); Daane et al.
into the furrows using the herbicide spray rig, and (2008a, b, c)
the application is followed by 1-day post-treat- Silwet L-77 Tipping et al. (2003)
ment irrigation. In the furrow method, there is a Imidacloprid Patricia Larrain (1999);
more widespread root zone that makes the deliv- Bentley et al. (2008);
ery of insecticide to the entire root zone difcult Gonzalez et al. (2001);
Daane et al. (2008a, b, c);
and results in a more dilute application and poor
Sunitha et al. (2009)
uptake of applied imidacloprid. Irrigation of both Azadirachtin Verghese (1997); Mani et al.
pre- and post-imidacloprid application is critical (2008)
and this is very difcult to properly manipulate Nimbecidine Koli (2003)
with furrow irrigation system. Neem-seed kernel Balikai (1999a); Koli (2003)
Soil application of granular insecticides, extract (NSKE)
namely phorate, carbofuran, thiodematon, fen- NSKE + soap powder Katke (2008)
sulfothion or bendiocarb (6 or 10 kg a.i./ha), once Neem oil Beevi et al. (1992)
after each pruning, was found to be ineffective in Neem oil + soap Katke (2008)
powder
reducing the mealybug infestation. However, one
Petroleum oil Michelakis and Hamid
application of granular insecticide aldicarb @ 50
(1995)
g/vine around the base of the plant at the time of
Fish-oil rosin soap Reddy and Narayana (1986)
October pruning protected the bunches com- Parathion Grimes and Cone (1985a);
pletely from mealybug infestation for 34 months AliNiazee and Stafford
(Anonymous 1984; Mani and Thontadarya 1991). (1972)
Though it is an excellent chemical for the mealy- Methyl parathion AliNiazee and Stafford
bug control in both April- and October-pruned (1972)
crops, the time of application (to be applied Permethrin Grimes and Cone (1985a)
immediately after pruning) is a critical factor, and Malathion Grimes and Cone (1985a);
Su and Wang (1988);
the farmers may not adhere strictly to the applica- Baskaran et al. (1999)
tion time and may apply the chemical to the vines Methidathion, AliNiazee and Stafford
particularly in the fruiting stage (many growers supracide (1972)
become aware of the damage at that stage, which Dimethoate AliNiazee and Stafford
will result in high residue problem). There are (1972); Shreedhar Rao et al.
(1988); Su and Wang (1988);
many restrictions in using aldicarb in the vine-
Baskaran et al. (1999); Sazo
yard ecosystem in India. A list of insecticides et al. (2008)
recommended to control mealybugs is given in Dimethoate + Fish-oil Katke (2008)
Table 38.2. rosin soap
Methomyl Mani et al. (2008); Balikai
(1999a); Raguraman and
Premalatha (2006)
38.5.4 Monitoring of Ants
Chlorpyriphos Mani et al. (2008); Bentley
et al. (2008); Hatta and Hara
Ants are known to attack the predators of scales (1992)
and mealybugs while attending to the pests. Dichlorvos Mani et al. (2008); Balikai
Therefore, it is necessary to check the activity (1999a); Shreedhar Rao
of ants prior to the release of Cryptolaemus. et al. (1988); FIP (1982)
General ant control measures like destruction of Dichlorvos + sh-oil Mani (1990); Beevi et al.
rosin soap (1992)
ant holes and ant nests, application of sticky
(continued)
38 Fruit Crops: Grapevine 341

Table 38.2 (continued) as a 6 % solution to control the honeydew-feeding


Chemical Reference formicid Iridomyrmex humilis gave good results.
Clothianidin, Bentley et al. (2008) By controlling the formicid, infestation levels of
spirotetromat Pseudococcus afnis, a pest of grapes, could be
acetamiprid signicantly reduced (Phillips and Sherk 1991).
Phenthoate Aida et al. (2010)
Diazinon Ripa and Rojas (1990)
Aldicarb Anonymous (1984); Mani
(1986)
38.5.5 Biological Control
Monocrotophos Shreedhar Rao et al. (1988);
Beevi et al. (1992); Mealybugs are called hard-to-kill pests of fruit
Tejkumar et al. (1977); FIP trees. There are several reasons that may account
(1982) for this fact. Chemical control of grape mealy-
Fenitrothion Anwar (1991) bugs was ineffective (Ripa and Rojas 1990).
Methyl demeton Beevi et al. (1992) Perhaps the most important factor is the habitat
Triazophos Persad and Khan (2000) of the mealybug. Mealybugs live in protected
Pirimiphos-methyl Persad and Khan (2000);
areas such as cracks and crevices of bark, at bases
Salazar et al. (2010)
of leaf petioles, on the undersides of leaves and
Phosphamidon Satyanarayana et al. (2003)
inside the fruit bunch. Eggs of the mealybugs,
Diafenthiuron Biradar et al. (2006)
Fenvalerate FIP (1982)
protected by waxy lamentous secretions of ovi-
Prothiophos Lo et als (2009); Swart and
sac, are almost impossible to reach with insecti-
Barnes (1976) cides. Late-instar nymphs and adult female
Thiamethoxam, Sunitha et al. (2009) mealybugs are not affected by foliar application
acephate of insecticides since they are covered with waxy
coating. Insecticides are limited in their effective-
bands around the tree trunk and chlorpyriphos ness, because vine mealybugs can feed on all sec-
0.05 % into the anthills are to be adopted to sup- tions of the plant and portion of the population
press the activity of the ants. After the patrolling remains protected from insecticide sprays under
(up and down) of ants on the trunk is stopped, the the bark or on the roots resulting in the build-up
beetles are to be released. In eld trials in a vine- of mealybug population (Daane et al. 2003).
yard in San Luis Obispo County, California, Mealybugs are also known to develop resistance
between 1989 and 1990, the use of chlorpyriphos to commonly used insecticides.

Natural enemies of grape mealybugs

A. dactylopii L. dactylopii S. coccivora C. perigrinus

A number of natural enemies are known to ists. Few fungal pathogens are also known to
attack vine mealybugs throughout the world. infect mealybugs in nature. However, mealybugs,
Many of the parasitoids are mealybug species being sessile insects, are more amenable to bio-
specic, while most of the predators are general- logical control.
342 M. Mani and U. Amala

38.6 Maconellicoccus hirsutus destroyer, Australian ladybird beetle, Crypts


and Cryptolaemus. It has often provided spec-
Natural enemy complex is very rich on vine tacular control of heavy infestations of mealy-
mealybugs in absence of insecticide sprays. Six bugs on various horticultural crops. Though
parasitoids and seven predators have been associ- several local predators are known to attack the
ated with M. hirsutus in India. The parasitoids are vineyard mealybugs, culturing and releasing
Anagyrus dactylopii (Howard), Allotropa sp. nr. them did not provide adequate control of mealy-
japonica (Ashmead), Gyranusoidea mirzai bugs. Biological control using the Australian
(Agarwal), Alamella ava (Agarwal), Leptopilina ladybird beetle Cryptolaemus montrouzieri is
sp. and Chartocerus sp. nr. walkeri (Hayat). The found practicable and successful to control
predators are Scymnus gratiosus (Wiese), almost all the grape mealybug species in India.
Scymnus coccivora (Ayyar), C. montrouzieri, Field release of laboratory-reared Cryptolaemus
Chrysopa sp., Spalgis epius (Westwood), montrouzieri beetles are found to be effective in
Cacoxenus perspicax (Knab) and Triommata suppressing the population of the pink mealybug
coccidivora (Felt). Among these, A. dactylopii M. hirsutus in vineyards (Reddy and Narayana
and S. coccivora were of considerable impor- 1986; Manjunath 1986; Mani and Thontadarya
tance. A. dactylopii caused up to 70 % parasitism 1988a; Srinivasan and Sundara Babu (1989).
in nature (Mani et al. 1987). C. montrouzieri, Adults and larvae can be released in the eld
though occurring in large numbers in other eco- for the suppression of pests. Adults upon release
systems, is not commonly found attacking the soon produce sufcient offspring to clear the
mealybugs in vineyard ecosystem. Biological mealybugs. However, the release of larvae is pre-
studies were made in the natural enemies by ferred to adults when the mealybug infestation is
Mani (1986). The major parasitoid A. dactylopii conned to few plants. Usually, the releases are
is able to complete the life cycle in 15 days time made from 8.00 AM to 10.00 AM and from 3 to
(Mani and Thontadarya 1988c) and can be reared 5 PM. The best time for the release of predatory
on 1520-day-old mealybugs (Mani and beetles is the evening as the predators settle down
Thontadarya 1989). Allotropa japonica can be immediately. It is advised to release Cryptolaemus
reared on 1520-day-old M. hirsutus (Mani and during JuneAugust to clear the residual mealy-
Krishnamoorthy 1989), and the larva of S. coc- bug population so that the grape plants will be
civora was known to consume 308 eggs or 62 free from the mealybug damage in the main fruit-
nymphs or 6.55 adult mealybugs (Mani and ing season (JanuaryApril) (Mani et al. 2008).
Thontadarya 1987a, b). Green lacewing adults However, many grape growers did not get the
are frequently abundant on grapevines harbour- desired level of control with the release of C.
ing mealybugs and other sucking insects. montrouzieri mainly due to the lack of proper
Lacewing adults are attracted to the mealybug planning of the time of releasing the predator.
honeydew, but it is not known to what degree Considering the interference of pesticides, preda-
their egg laying and subsequent control of mealy- tor, production time, availability of C. montrouz-
bug is inuenced by the presence of mealybug. A ieri from commercial insectaries and mild
positive and signicant relationship between the weather factors in both the laboratory and the
dominant parasites Anagyrus dactylopii (Howard) eld, releasing of the predator C. montrouzieri in
and M. hirsutus was observed. July is highly preferable for the suppression of
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant) was mealybugs. During July September, weather
used to control mealybugs in many countries. C. factors prevailing in both the laboratory and eld
montrouzieri has been ranked second in impor- conditions favour the activity of the predator
tance only to Rodolia cardinalis (Mulsant). It is ensuring its production and efciency. There is
popularly known as Australian mealybug less/no application of insecticides during this part
38 Fruit Crops: Grapevine 343

of the year (off season) facilitating the non- dactylopii may not be useful in controlling the
interference with the predator. Almost 3 months pink mealybug since it is present already in
are available for the predator (JulySeptember) nature and has attained biotic balance. Anagyrus
to clear the residual population of mealybugs kamali (Moursi), an encyrtid parasitoid, caused
present on the vines. A mean of 97.67 % reduc- 8090 % reduction in population density of pink
tion in the bunch infestation was obtained with hibiscus mealybug at release sites in Egypt,
the release of C. montrouzieri in July (Fig. 38.3). Caribbean Islands and the United States. This
Depending upon the severity of infestation, the parasitoid is to be tried against M. hirsutus in
beetles have to be released. A release rate of vineyards in India.
5,000 beetles/ha is recommended to suppress the Lecanicillium (Verticillium) lecanii
pest population. Two to three releases are to be (Zimmerman) and Metarhizium anisopliae
made annually depending upon the severity of (Metch) are known to cause mortality of mealy-
pest infestation. The releases have to be made bugs (Katke 2008; Humber and Soper 1981). The
early in the season. The rst generation develops pathogen V. lecanii (Zimmerman) was isolated
from the released beetles. The second generation from whiteies and developed as a biopesticide
denitely brings down the pest population. As a named as Phule bugicide at Mahatma Phule
prerequisite for release, spraying of insecticides Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India,
has to be discontinued for 23 weeks prior to the for the control of mealybugs. A dosage of 20 g
release of the predator. It is better to release less formulated material/10 L of water is recom-
number of beetles at many places in unit area of mended to control the mealybugs. Two to three
the vineyard rather than more number of beetles sprays at 15-day intervals in rainy season are
at few places. needed. Addition of milk powder 5 g/10 L water
Anagyrus dactylopii is the naturally occurring helps to improve the control of mealybugs. Foliar
parasitoid on Maconellicoccus hirsutus in India. sprays of fungal pathogens, namely Beauveria
Inundative augmentation by ooding the chosen bassiana (Bals.) Vuill and Metarhizium aniso-
area with large numbers of particular natural pliae, in the rainy season under humid conditions
enemy is intended to exert rapid control of the were also found to infect the mealybugs.
pest in the present generation and prevent or Verticillium lecanii WP (Wettable Powder) @ 0.3
bring down the possible damage to host. % was found to be best against nymphs and
Conservation of the native A. dactylopii through adults of grape mealybug in Maharashtra (Koli
parasite-friendly insecticides like dichlorvos or 2003). The fungus was known to cause 80 %
buprofezin is to be done. Inundative release of A. mortality of some sucking pests at 2 105 cfu/mL

Fig. 38.3 Seasonal incidence of grape mealybug in Bijapur


344 M. Mani and U. Amala

dose in Maharashtra state within two weeks Province and Georgia, P. citri was effectively con-
(Jayachakravarthy 2002). Fish-oil rosin soap (0.5 trolled by the release of C. montrouzieri (Aykac
%) with V. lecanii (0.4 %) was the safest and and Erguder 1972) (Dzhiviladze 1979).
most suitable treatment against grapevine mealy- The main parasite of P. citri infesting grapes is
bug, M. hirsutus (Shelke 2001). Anagyrus pseudococci (Girault), which occurs in
the south of European Russia and in Soviet
Central Asia and which destroys up to 75 % of
38.7 Planococcus citri (Risso) the coccid population in areas not treated with
insecticides (Niyazov 1969). Leptomastix dacty-
Besides Spain and Brazil, Planococcus citri lopii (Howard) is an effective encyrtid parasitoid
(Risso) is injurious to grapevine in the Soviet of citrus mealybug Planococcus citri (Risso).
Union. The main parasite of P. citri is Anagyrus The parasitoid can be multiplied on the
pseudococci (Girault), which occurs in the south laboratory-bred P. citri, P. lilacinus (Cockerell)
of European Russia and in Soviet Central Asia and P. minor (P. pacicus) (Cox). L. dactylopii
and which destroys up to 75 % of the mealybug was recovered in large numbers from P. citri
population in areas not treated with insecticides. infesting wine grapes in Maharashtra. It gives
Allotropa mecrida (Walker), the second most scope of utilizing L.dactylopii to control P.citri in
important parasite, was reared from the mealy- vineyards in Maharashtra and Karnataka. It has
bug in Turkmenia, and in Georgia it is responsi- given excellent control of P. citri in citrus in India
ble for up to 20 % parasitism. In 1960, (Krishnamoorthy and Singh 1987) and guava
Leptomastidea abnormis (Girault) and ecosystems in India (Mani 1994). Alternatively,
Leptomastix dactylopii (Howard) were intro- inundative releases of the local Coccidoxenoides
duced into Georgia and subsequently into perminutus can be done to suppress P. citri since
Turkmenia from the United States. In it can be multiplied easily in large numbers and it
Transcaucasia and Soviet Central Asia, Thysanus is a major parasitoid of P. citri in citrus ecosys-
(Chartocerus) subaeneus (Forster) is responsible tem in India (Mani 1994).
for up to 1820 % parasitism of Allotropa
mecrida. Others are Coccinella septempunctata
(Linnaeus), Hyperaspis polita (Weise), Scymnus 38.8 Pseudococcus longispinus
apetzi (Mulsant), S. subvileosus (Goeze), S.
bipunctatus (Kug.) and S. biguttatus (Mulsant), Currently, Ps. longispinus infests a small number
which were noted in Turkmenia. The larvae of of vineyards in Californias coastal region.
Leucopis (Leucopomya) alticeps (Czerny) and Recent surveys found Trachelomonas sydneyen-
Chrysoperla carnea (Stephen) destroy virtually sis (Playfair), Tetracnemus peregrina (Compere),
all stages of the mealybug (Niyazov 1969). Acerophagus angelicus (Howard), Anagyrus
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri has given excellent pseudococci, Leptomastidea abnormis (Girault),
control of P. citri in several ecosystems in many Leptomastix dactylopii (Howard) and
countries. Extensive eld trials were conducted in Coccidoxenoides perminutus (Girault) attacking
Karnataka and Maharashtra in India on the use of this mealybug (Daane et al. 2008a).
Cryptolaemus for the control of P. citri mealybug
on grapevine. Cryptolaemus montrouzieri proved
to be very useful in suppressing the mealybug in 38.9 Planococcus cus
the grape gardens (Mani and Krishnamoorthy
2008). In USSR, C. montrouzieri was one of the As many as 20 natural enemies were recorded on
most effective predators introduced into Black Sea P. cus infesting grapes. Natural enemy complex
Coastal area for the control of P. citri in the vine- consists of the parasitoids, namely Angyrus sp.,
yards (Niyazov 1969). In the vineyards of Tokat Coccidoxenoides perminutus (Girault),
38 Fruit Crops: Grapevine 345

Leptomastix dactylopii (Howard) and the preda- 38.12 Calendar-Based Practices


tors (Mulsant), N. angustus (Casey) and N. qua- for Grape Mealybug
drivittatus (Mulsant). Biological control was Management in India
severely hampered by the presence of a variety of
ant species. Ant control has been achieved using Collection and destruction of the mealybug
chemical-stem-barrier treatments. Control of P. infested bunches at the time of harvesting in
cus with the mass releases of Coccidoxenoides MarchApril.
perminutus was at least as effective as the cur- Removal of loose bark and destruction of the
rently used chemical control programme in South debarked material in April/May.
Africa (Walton and Pringle 2004). Collection and destruction of all the pruned
material from mealybug-infested gardens in
April/May and again in October.
38.10 Other Mealybugs Removal of weeds and alternate host plants
harbouring mealybugs in and around the vine-
C. montrouzieri can also take care of other mealy- yards throughout the year.
bug species infesting grapes in India, which are Early pruning in AugustSeptember usually
Nipaecoccus viridis, Pseudococcus citriculus results in escape of the crop from the mealybug
and Ferrisia virgata. attack as compared to late pruning in
DecemberJanuary.
Monitoring and destroying the mealybug col-
38.11 Integration with Chemicals onies as and when seen on the trunk, stem, etc.
from November to February.
The pesticides often interfere with the activity of Locating the ant colonies and destroying them
the predatory beetle. To ensure the best effective- with drenching of chlorpyriphos 20 EC @ 2.5
ness of predators beetles in controlling grape mL/L or dusting with malathion, since the
mealybug, it is absolutely essential to release the ants are associated with the build-up of mealy-
beetles only in spots having adequate mealybug bug population.
population and avoid spraying insecticides that Swabbing/washing of trunk and cordons with
are lethal to the predatory beetles. Indiscriminate 2 mL of chlorpyriphos 20 EC + 2 g of sh-oil
and frequent sprays of different pesticides proved rosin soap in a litre of water in AprilMay and
detrimental to the establishment of the predatory again in October.
beetles in vineyards. Soil drenching with imidacloprid 200 SL at
Commonly used fungicides and acaricides, the basins around the trunk through drip irri-
namely copper oxychloride, mancozeb, sulphur, gation @ 400 mL/ ac in AprilMay and again
captafol, carbendazim, bordeaux mixture, dico- in the rst week of December.
fol, abamectin, etc., are found to be very safe to Foliar spray with buprofezin @ 1.25 mL/L
C. montrouzieri. Dichlorvos, chlorpyriphos and after 30 days of soil drenching depending on
buprofezin are found harmless to the ladybird the incidence of the mealybugs.
beetle. These pesticides can be applied safely Releasing the Australian ladybird beetle
without affecting the activity of the beetle. Fish- (Cryptolaemus montrouzieri) @ 5000/ha in
oil rosin soap and most of the botanical origin AugustSeptember to clear the mealybug
pesticides are also found to be very safe to the population present on the plants and again by
ladybird beetle (Mani et al. 2008; Mani and mid-December, if necessary.
Thontadarya 1988b). Alternatively, two to three foliar sprays of
Verticillium lecanii/Beauveria bassiana
8
(2 10 cfu/mL/g) @ 5 g/L at 15 days interval
346 M. Mani and U. Amala

in the rainy season (JulyAugust) can also be Balikai RA (1999a) New record of alternate host plants of
grape mealy bug. Insect Environ 5(2):81
given.
Balikai RA (1999b) Seasonal incidence of grapevine,
One or two applications of dichlorvos 76 % mealybug in North Karnataka. Insect Environ
EC (2 mL/L) from mid-February to the rst 4(4):148149
week of March, if necessary, depending upon Baskaran RKM, Lakshmi LG, Uthamasamy S (1999)
Coccids and their management in guava intercropped
the incidence of mealybugs and time of har-
with coconut. Pest Manage Hortic Ecosyst
vesting or one jet spray of water can also be 5(1):2831
given on the bunches if the mealybugs are still Batra RC, Brar SS, Khangura JS, Dhillon WS (1987) A
present just prior to harvest to dislodge the new record of Planococcus pacicus Cox.
(Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera) as a pest of grapevine in
mealybugs.
India. Punjab Hortic J 27(34):250251
Beevi ND, Janarthanan R, Natarajan K (1992) Efcacy of
some insecticides against Maconellicoccus hirsutus
(Green) on mulberry. J Insect Sci 5(1):114
References Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
Afanassiev AP (1915) Russian viticulture in 1915. Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
Messenger Viticult Odesssa XXX:114, 3652, ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
114141 importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, p 686
Aida H, Mohammad 1, Saber F Moussa1, Ahmed H, Abo- Bentley WJ, Varela LG, Zalom F, Smith RJ, Purcell AH,
Ghalia, Sayed A Ahmed (2010) Efciency of certain Phillips PA, Haviland DR, Daane KM, Battany MC
insecticides on the population(s) of the pink hibiscus (2008) Grape: pest management guidelines. University
mealybug Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) and their of California IPM Pest Management Guidelines:
natural enemies under the eld condition in Ismailia Grapes, Insects and Mites Publication 3448. University
governorate. Egypt Acad J Biol Sci 2(2):1117 of California Press, Berkeley
AliNiazee MT, Stafford EM (1972) Control of the grape Berlinger MJ (1977) The Mediterranean vine mealybug
mealybug on Thompson Seedless grapes in and its natural enemies in southern Israel.
California. J Econ Entomol 65(6):1744 Phytoparasitica 5:314
Anonymous (1917) Vine coccids in Hungary Rev. Viticult Bernard L (1914) Technique of methods of control of
Paris XLVI:270 insect pests of vine. J.B. Boilliere etls, Paris, 364 p
Anonymous (1946) Short notes and exhibits. Indian Bierlleonhardt BA, Moreno DS, Schwarz M, Fargerlund
J Entomol 7:237242 J, Plimmer JR (1981) Isolation, identication and syn-
Anonymous (1984) Woes of grape growers of Anantapur. thesis of the sex pheromone of the citrus mealybug,
The Hindu, dated 7 Dec 1984 Planococcus citri (Risso). Tetrahedron Lett
Anonymous (1992) A report submitted to the research 22:389392
review committee meeting in agricultural entomology Biradar AP, Kabadagi CB, Patil DR (2006) Evaluation of
and nematology for 199192. Mahatma Phule Krishi Diafenthiuron 50 SC (Polo) against grape mealy bug,
Vidhyapeeth, Rahuri, (Maharashtra), 19 p Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green). Int J Agric Sci
Anwar A (1991) Effect of spraying of insecticides on 2(2):470471
mealy bugs attack. Bull Penelit Hutan 541:710 Bodenheimer FS (1944) Note on the coccoidea of Iran
Artigas JN (1994) Entomologa econmica, Insectos de with descriptive of new species (Hemiptera:
inters agrcola, forestal, medico y veterinario, vol 1. Homoptera). Bull Soc Found Ier Ent 28:85100
Ediciones Universidad de Concepcin, Concepcin, Bonnemaison FS (1962) Les ennemis a nimaux desplants
1126 p cultives et des forets, vol 3. SEP, Paris, 1502
Avidov Z, Swirski E (1950) Control of citrus mealybug on Brotherston RP (1914) Mealybug on vines. Gardners
grapevines by organophosphate preparations. Chron., Lond IV:349
Hassadeh 30:716718 Cabaleiro C, Segura A (1997) Field transmission of
Aykac MK, Erguder TM (1972) A study of control mea- grapevine leaf roll associated virus 3 (GLRaV-3) by
sures against Planococcus citri (Risso) in the vine- the mealybug Planococcus citri. Plant Dis
yards of Tok at Province. Sams BioI Zir Mucad Arast 81:283287
Enstit 43:171172 Cabaleiro C, Couceiro C, Pereira S, Cid M, Barrasa M,
Azam KM (1983) Losses due to pests in grapes. Indian Segura A (2008) Spatial analysis of epidemics of
J Ent (Special Issue) 2:387389 grapevine leaf roll associated virus-3. Eur J Plant
Babu TR, Azam KM (1987) Studies on biology, host Pathol 121:121130
spectrum and seasonal population uctuation of the Camporese P (1994) Prime osservazioni sulla biologia di
mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) on Heliococcus bohemicus Sulc nei vigneti del veneto.
grapevine. Indian J Hortic 44(34):284288 Mem Soc Entomol Ital 72:195200
38 Fruit Crops: Grapevine 347

Chacko MJ, Bhat PK, Rao LVA, Deepak Singh MB, Daane KM, Cooper ML, Triapitsyn SV, Walton VM,
Ramanarayan EP, Sreedharan K (1978) The use of Yokota GY, Haviland DR, Bentley WJ, Godfrey KE,
ladybird beetle, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, for the Wunderlich LR (2008b) Vineyard managers and
control of coffee mealybugs. J Coffee Res 8:1419 researchers seek sustainable solutions for mealybugs,
Charles JG (1981) Distribution and life history of the a changing pest complex. Calif Agric 62:167176
long-tailed mealybug, Pseudococcus longispinus Daane KM, Bentley WJ, Millar JG, Walton VM, Cooper
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in Auckland New ML, Biscay P, Yokota GY (2008c) Integrated manage-
Zealand vineyards. N Z J Zool 8:285294 ment of mealybugs in California vineyards. Acta
Charles JG, Walker JTS, White V (1993) Resistance to Hortic 785:235252
chlorpyriphos in the mealybugs Pseudococcus afnis Daane KM, Bentley WJ, Smith RJ, Haviland DR, Weber
and P. longispinus in Hawkes Bay and Waikato pip- E, Gispert C, Battany MC, Millar JG (2011) Vine
fruit orchards. In: Proceedings of the forty sixth New mealybug. In: Bettiga L, Bentley WJ (eds) University
Zealand plant protection conference, Christchurch, of California grape pest management manual.
New Zealand, pp 120125 University of California Press, Oakland, pp 125135
Chochiya AS (1941) Propagation of Symherobious in Daane KM, Rodrigo PP, Almeida, Bell VA, Walker JT,
Abkazhia (Russia). Sparav Vop Karant Rast 9:79 (d. Botton S, Fallahzadesh M, Mani M, Miano JL, Sforza
RAE32: 101) R, Walton VM, Zaveizo T (2012) Biology and man-
Chong JH, Roda AL, Mannion CM (2008) Life history of agement of mealybugs in vineyards. In: Bostman NJ
the mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera: et al (ed) Arthropod management in Vineyard pests,
Pseudococcidae), at constant temperatures. Environ approaches, and future directions. Springer
Entomol 37:323332 Science + Media B.V., Dordrecht, pp 271307.
Chris AG, Kent MD (2001) Seasonal movement and dis- doi:10.1007/978-007-4032-7-12
tribution of the grape mealy bug (Homoptera: Dantsig EM (1977) The nomenclature and distribution of
Pseudoccidae): developing a sampling programme for some harmful species of coccids (Homopera;
San Joaquin valley vineyards. J Econ Entomol Coccoidea). Entomol Checkol Obozrenie 56:99102
94(1):291301 De Castella F, French C (1929) Mealybug Dactylopius
Cordo H, Logarzo G, Braun O, Di Iorio O (2004) Catalog longispinus, a potential vine pest. J Dept Agrie Vie
of phytophagus insects of Argentina and their associ- XXVII:427433
ated plants, Impreso en San Miguel de Tucuman, Driesche RG, Van Bellotti AC, Castillo J, Herrera CJ
Argentina, 734p (1990) Estimating total losses from parasitoids for a
Cottier HRA, Jacks H (1952) Control of the grape house eld population of a continuously breeding insect, cas-
mealybug (Pseudococcus maritimus Ehrh. sava mealybug, Phenacoccus herreni (Homoptera:
(Wellington). N Z J Sci Tech 34:266276 Pseudococcidae) in Colombia, S.A. Fla Entomol
Cox J (1977) Survey of mealybug species (Homoptera: 73(1):133143
Pseudococcidae) in Auckland orchards and vineyards. Dzhiviladze KN (1979) Use of biological methods in
N Z J Agric Res 20:259261 Georgia. Zashch Rast 5:28
CSIRO (2001) Australian Insect Common Names. http:// El Sayed MT, Soliman AA, Salama HS (1962) On the
www.ento.csiro.au/aicn/ chemical control of the grapevine mealybug,
Daane KM, Malakar-Kuenen R, Guillen M, Bentley WJ, Planococcus (Pseudococcus) vitis (Nied) (Homoptera:
Bianchi M, Gonzalez D (2003) Abiotic and biotic pest Pseudococcidae). Bull Soc Entomol Egypt 46:467472
refuges hamper biological control of mealybugs in Fedorov SI (1926) Pests of vines in the crimes in 1925
California vineyards. In: Proceedings of the 1st inter- 26. Vesnik vinodel Ukrai XXVIII:2225
national symposium on biological control of arthro- Fisher PW (1983) Mealybug control in grapes. In:
pods, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1418 Jan 2002, Proceedings of 36th N. weed and pest control confer-
pp 389398 ence Christchurch, New Zealand, pp 145147
Daane KM, Bentley WJ, Walton VM, Malakar-Kuenen R, Flaherty D, Jensen F, Nakata J (1976) Grape mealybug.
Millar JG, Ingels CA, Weber EA, Gispert C (2006) University of California Agriculture Extension,
New controls investigated for vine mealybug. Calif Barkely, CA, A 0038, 13 p
Agric 60:3138 Flaherty DL, Peacock WL, Bettiga L, Leavitt GM (1982)
Daane KM, Sime KR, Fallon J, Cooper ML (2007) Chemicals losing effect against grape mealybug. Calif
Impacts of Argentine ants on mealybugs and their Agric 36(5/6):1516
natural enemies in Californias coastal vineyards. Ecol Flebut AJ (1922) The grape mealybug. Mon Bull Calif
Entomol 32:583596 State Dept Agric Sacramento XI(7):611
Daane KM, Cooper ML, Triapitsyn SV, Andrews JW, Fletcher TB (1919) Report of the imperial entomologist.
Ripa R (2008a) Parasitoids of obscure mealybug, Scientic reports of the Agricultural Research
Pseudococcus viburni (Hem.: Pseudococcidae) in Institute, Pusa, 19181919, pp 86103
California: establishment of Pseudaphycus avidulus Fletcher TB (1923) Report of imperial entomologist.
(Hym.: Encyrtidae) and discussion of related parasit- Scientic reports of the Agricultural Research
oid species. Biocontrol Sci Technol 18:4357 Institute, 192219923, pp 6175
348 M. Mani and U. Amala

Fletcher TB (1932) Report of the imperial entomologist. Humber RA, Soper RS (1981) Isolation, preservation and
Scientic reports of the Agricultural Research identication of entomopathogenic fungi. In: Rogerts
Institute, for 19301931, pp 8792 DW (ed) Entomopathogenic fungi. Allenheld Osmum,
Foldi I, Kozar F (2006) New species of Cataenococcus Mont Clair
and Puto from Brazil and Venezuela, with data on oth- FIP Hyderabad (1982) Studies on seasonal occurance of
ers species (Hemiptera:Coccidea). Nouvelle grape pests around Hyderabad. Research reports, fruit
RevuedEntomologie 22:305312 improvement project, p 493
Forte V, Duso C, Borgo M, Pozzebon A (2008) Effects of Ibadova SI (1985) Bioecological characteristics of the
pesticides on the grape mealybug Planococcus cus grape mealybug (Planococcus cus Signoret) in the
(Homoptera Pseudococcidae) in North-Eastern Italy Apsheronskiy Peninsula [Russian]. Izvestiya
[Italian]. Giornate Fitopatologiche 2008, Cervia (RA), Akademii Nauk Azerbaidzhanskoi SSR,
1214 marzo 2008. 1:211218 Biologicheskikh Nauk 4:6669
Francis A, Bloem KA, Roda AL, Lapointe SL, Zhang A, Iordanou N (1974) Chemical control of grape berry moth.
Onokpise O (2007) Development of trapping methods Tech Pap Agric Res Inst Cyprus 5(7):88
with a synthetic sex pheromone of the pink hibiscus Jablonowski J (1917) Scale insects as vine pests and their
mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera: relationships with other cultivated plants. Mon Bull
Pseudococcidae). Fla Entomol 90:440446 Agric Intell Plant Dis Rome VIII:316317
Frick KE (1952) The value of some organic phosphate Jadhav SS (1993) Life history of grape mealy bug,
insecticides in control of grape mealybug. J Econ Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) (Hemiptera:
Entomol 45:340341 Pseudococcidae) at different temperatures.
Fu Castillo AA, Miranda Blanco JL, Osorio Acosta G, Maharashtra J Hortic 7(1):1629
Martinez Carrillo JL (2004) Chemical control of Jakab J, Szendrey L (1989) On the presence of Heliococcus
mealybug Planococcus cus Signoret bohemicus Sulc in vineyards of the Hves region) (in
(Homoptera:Pseudococcidae) in table grapes[Spanish]. Hungarian). Nvnyvdelem XXV
Agric Tecnica Mex 30(1):101105 Evolyam:460464
Golino DA, Sim ST, Gill R, Rowhani A (2002) California Jayachakravarthy G (2002) Bioefcacy of fungal bioagent
mealybugs can spread grapevine leafroll disease. Calif Verticillium lecanii (Zimmerman) Vigas against some
Agric 56:196201 sucking pests. M.Sc. (Agri.) thesis, Mahatma Phule
Gonzalez RH (1982) The white mealybug on grapes. Rev Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra (India)
Fruiticola 4:37 Joubert CJ (1943) Mealybugs on vines. Bulletin of the
Gonzalez RH (2003) Mealybugs of agricultural and quar- Department of Agriculture of South Africa 243
antine importance in fruit orchards in Chile (Hem.: Katke M (2008) Seasonal incidence, biology and man-
Pseudococcidae). Rev Fruticola 24:517 agement of grape mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsu-
Gonzalez RH, Poblete JG, Barria PG (2001) The tree fruit tus (Green) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Ph.D.
mealybug in Chile, Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret), thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad,
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Rev Fruticola India
22:1726 Kaydan MB, Klncer N (2005) Natural enemies of
Grimes EW, Cone WW (1985a) Control of the grape Phenacoccus aceris (Signoret) (Hem.:
mealybug, Pseudococcus maritimus (Hom.: Pseudococcidae) and their population dynamics and
Pseudococcidae), on Concord grape in Washington. determination of effects on mealybug population
J Entomol Soc B C 82:36 [Turkish]. Bitki Koruma Bulteni 45(14):7997
Grimes EW, Cone WW (1985b) Life history, sex attrac- Koli HR (2003) Seasonal incidence and management of
tion, mating, and natural enemies of the grape mealy- grape mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green).
bug, Pseudococcus maritimus (Homoptera: M.Sc. (Agri.) thesis, Mahatma Phule Krishi
Pseudococcidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 78:554558 Vidhyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra (India)
Gullan PJ (2000) Identication of the immature instars of Kozar F, Guignard E, Bachmann F, Mani E, Hippe C
mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) found on cit- (1994) The scale insect and whitey of Switzerland
rus in Australia. Aust J Entomol 39:160166 (Homoptera: Coccoidea and Aleyrodoidea). Bulletin
Gullan PJ, Downie DA, Steffan SA (2003) A new pest de la socit entomologique Suisse 67:151161
species of the mealybug genus Ferrisia Fullaway Krishnamoorthy A, Singh SP (1987) Biological control of
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from the United States. citrus mealybug with an introduced parasite,
Ann Entomol Soc Am 96:723737 Leptomastix dactylopii in India. Entomophaga
Gutierrez AP, Daane KM, Ponti L, Walton VM, Ellis CK 32:143148
(2008) Prospective evaluation of the biological control Kurdyukov VV, Alan MN (1973) Damage caused by cit-
of vine mealybug: refuge effects and climate. J Appl rus mealybug Pseudococcus citri on grapevine and its
Ecol 45:524536 chemical control. Zash Rast 26:2630
Hatta TY, Hara AH (1992) Evaluation of insecticides Lambdin RL (1983) A revision of the genus, Asterococcus
against pests of red ginger in Hawaii. Trop Pest (Hemip: Cerocckcidae). Proc Entomal Soc Wash
Manage 38(3):234236 85:297308
38 Fruit Crops: Grapevine 349

Lo PL, Walker JTS (2010) Good results from a soil- Mani M, Thontadarya TS (1991) Effect of soil application
applied insecticide against mealybugs. N Z of systemic granular insecticides on the population of
Winegrower 14:125127 grape mealybug and its natural enemies. Pestology
Lo PL, Walker JTS (2011) Soil applications of two nicoti- XV(7):2430
noid insecticides to control mealybugs Mani M, Thontadarya TS, Singh SP (1987) Record of
(Pseudococcidae) in vineyards. N Z Plant Prot natural enemies on the grape mealybug,
64:101106 Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green). Curr Sci India
Lo PL, Bell VA, Walker JTS (2009) Maximising the effec- 56:624625
tiveness of insecticides to control mealybugs in vine- Mani M, Kulkarni NS, Banerjee K, Adsule PG (2008)
yards. N Z Plant Prot 62:296301 Pest management in grapes. Extension Bulletin No. 2,
Lotrionte G (1920) La cocciniglia grigia della vite La NRC For Grapes, Pune, 50 p
Nuova Agricultura del Lazia, Rome VIII:42 Manjunath TM (1985) India- Maconellicoccus hirsutus
Mahfoudhi N, Dhouibi MH (2009) Survey of mealybugs on grapevine. FAO Plant Prot Bull 33(2):74
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and their natural ene- Manjunath TM (1986) Recent outbreaks of mealybugs
mies in Tunisian vineyards. Afr Entomol and their biological control in Resurgence of sucking
17(2):154160 pests. In: Jayaraj S (ed) Proceedings of national sym-
Mani M (1986) Distribution, bioecology and management posium. TNAU, Coimbatore, pp 249253
of the grape mealybug, Macone/licoccus hirsutus Mansour R, Youss FE, Lebdi KG, Rezgui S (2010)
(Green) with special reference to its natural enemies. Imidacloprid applied through drip irrigation as a new
Ph.D. thesis, USA, Bangalore, 201 p promising alternative to control mealybugs in Tunisian
Mani M (1990) Rid the grape-vine of mealybug. Indian vineyards. J Plant Prot Res 50(3):314319
Hortic 35:2829 Manuel de Borbon C, Gracia O, Gomez Talquenca GS
Mani M (1994) Effectiveness of the exotic encyrtid para- (2004) Mealybugs and grapevine leafroll-associated
sitoid, Leptomastix dactylopii How. in the control of virus 3 in vineyards of Mendoza, Argentina. Am
mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso) in guava J Enol Viticul 55:283285
orchards. J Entomol Res 18(4):351355 Marotta S, Harten A, Van A, Mahyoub MA (2001)
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1989) Feeding potential and Mealybugs on agricultural crops in Yemen. Bolletino
development of green lacewing Mallada boninensis de zoologia Agraria e di Bachicoltura 33(3):
(Okamoto) on the grape mealy bug, Maconellicoccus 233238
hirsutus (Green). Entomon 14(1 & 2):1920 Mgocheki N, Addison P (2009) Interference of ants
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (2008) Biological control of (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with biological control of
Planococcus citri (Risso) on grapevine with the vine mealybug Planococcus cus (Signoret)
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri in India. Indian J Plant (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Biol Control
Prot 36:125127 49:180185
Mani M, Kulkarni NS (2007) Citrus mealybug Michelakis S, Hamid HA (1995) Integrated control meth-
Planococcus citri (Risso) Homoptera; ods of the citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso)
Pseudococcidae)- a major pest of grapes in India. in Crete, Greece. Isr J Ent 29:277284
Entomon 32:235236 Millar JG, Daane KM, McElfresh JS, Moreira JA,
Mani M, Thontadarya TS (1987a) Record of mealy bug Malakar-Kuenen R, Guillen M, Bentley WJ (2002)
species on grapevine in Karnataka. Curr Sci 56:1192 Development and optimization of methods for using
Mani M, Thontadarya TS (1987b) Development and feed- sex pheromone for monitoring the mealybug
ing potential of the coccinellid, Cryptolaemus mon- Planococcus cus (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in
trouzieri Muls. on grape mealybug, Maconellicoccus California vineyards. J Econ Entomol 95:706714
hirsutus (Green). J Biol Control 1:1922 Morandi Filho WJ, Botton M, Grtzmacher AD, Fajardo
Mani M, Thontadarya TS (1988a) Field evaluation of TVM, Prado E (2007) Vetor Encoberto, cochonilhas
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. in the suppression algodonosas em videira. Revista Cultivar Hortalias e
of Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green on grapevine. Frutas, Pelotas, pp 2829
J Biol Control 2:1416 Murray DAH (1982) Effects of sticky banding of custard
Mani M, Thontadarya TS (1988b) Studies on the safety of apple tree trunks on ants and citrus mealybug
different pesticides to the grape mealybug natural ene- Planococcus citri (Risso) (Pseudococcidae,
mies, Anagyrus dactylopii (How.) and Scymnus coc- Hemiptera) in South Eastern Queensland. Qld J Agric
civora Ayyar. Indian J Plant Prot 16:205210 Animal Sci 39:141146
Mani M, Thontadarya TS (1988c) Biology of the grape Muthukrishnan N, Manoharan T, Thevan PST, Anbu S
mealybug parasitoid, Anagyrus dactylopii (How) (2005) Evaluation of buprofezin for the management
(Encyrtidae: Hymenoptera). Entomon of grape mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green).
13(34):211213 J Entomol Res 29(4):339344
Mani M, Thontadarya TS (1989) Development of the Myburg AC, Whitehead VB, Daiber CC (1973) Pests of
encyrtid parasitoid Anagyrus dactylopii (How.) on the deciduous fruits, grapes and miscellaneous other hor-
grape mealybug Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green). ticultural crops in South Africa. Entomol Memoir
Entomon 14:4951 27:2034
350 M. Mani and U. Amala

Niedielski (1969) Diseases of fruit trees in Crimea(ii) the citri (Homoptera: Coccoidea) in comparison to virgin
vine Coccus vitis L., 2.Cf. J Entomol Soc S Afr females. Bollettino del Laboratorio di Entomologia
38:125130 Agraria Filippo Silvestri 39:97102
Niyazov OD (1969) The parasites and predators of grape Rotundo G, Gaston LK, Shorey HH (1979) Collection and
mealybug. Zashch Rast 14:3840 purication of the female sex pheromone of
Nougaret RL (1920) Sulphur fumigation for the control of Pseudococcus calceolariae (Homoptera: Coccoidea).
mealybug (Pseudococcus bakeri, Essig) on grape Bollettino del Laboratorio di Entomologia Agraria
vines in the vineyard. Mon Bull Calif Dept Agric Qld Filippo Silvestri Portici 36:160171
9(2631):8385 Rozanov AA, Loseva VG (1963) The vine mealybug and
Panis A, Trevillot R (1975) Control of the mealybug in its parasites. Zashch Rast 3:53 (cf. RAE, 52:595)
French Mediterranean vineyards Prog. Agricole viti- Ruiz Castro A (1938) Experiments in the control of pseu-
cole 92:470473 dococcus citri on the grapevine. BoloPat Veg Ent
Patricia Larrain S (1999) Effect of chemigation and Agric 8:162170
painted applications of imidacloprid (CondorReg.) Rzaeva LM (1985) Parasites and predators of the grape
upon Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) (Homoptera: mealybug (Planococcus cus Signoret) and introduc-
Pseudococcidae) populations in table grapes [Spanish]. tion of new natural enemies into the eastern
Agricultura Tecnica (Santiago) 59(1):1325 Transcaucasus [Russian]. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk
Persad A, Khan A (2000) The effect of ve insecticides on Azerbaidzhanskoi SSR Biologicheskikh Nauk
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Homoptera: 4:3439
Pseudococcidae) and its natural enemies Anagyrus Salazar A, Gerding M, Luppichini P, Ripa R, Larran P,
kamali (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) and Cryptolaemus Zaviezo T, Larral P (2010) Biologa, Manejo y Control
montrouzieri and Schymnus coccivora (Coleoptera: de Chanchitos Blancos. Bol. INIA 204. Instituto de
Coccinellidae). Int Pest Control 42(5):170173 Investigaciones Agropecuarias (Chile), 59 p
Phillips PA, Sherk CJ (1991) To control mealybugs, stop Satyanarayana G (1981) Problems of grape production
honeydew-seeking ants. Calif Agric 45(2):2628 around Hyderabad. Andhra Pradesh grape growers
Pintz YI (1932) Notes on vine pests III. Helenendorf. Ent. association, Hyderabad, 60 p
Kab. Koop.Vinogr. Kondordiz 136 p. (Cf RAE(A) Satyanarayana C, Babu RKY, Manjunatha M (2003)
21:911) Preliminary studies on botanicals against
Prince RW, Fisher PW (1982) Mealybug control in grapes. Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green). Insect Environ
In: Proceedings of 35th New Zealand weed and pest 9(3):114115
control conference, 910 Aug 1982, pp 3638 Sazo L, Araya JE, Cerda J (2008) Effect of a siliconate
Puttarudraiah M, Murthy E (1976) Planococcoides sp. nr. coadjuvant and insecticides in the control of mealybug
robusta, a mango root mealy bug and its control. Curr of grapevines, Pseudococcus viburni (Hemiptera:
Res 5:205207 Pseudococcidae). Ciencia e Investigacion Agraria
Raguraman S, Premalatha K (2006) Field evaluation of 35:177184
methomyl against mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsu- Sforza R, Boudon-Padieu E, Greif C (2003) New mealy-
tus (Green) and predatory coccinellid, Cryptolaemus bug species vectoring grapevine leaf roll-associated
montrouzieri Mulsant in grapes. Pest Res viruses-1 and-3 (GLRaV-1 and-3). Eur J Plant Pathol
J 18(1):2830 109:975981
Rajagopal BK, Viraktamath CA, Nachi Gowda V (1997) Shak M, Husni M (1939) The ideal spray emulsion for
Incidence of ant associated mealybug Xenococcus the control of scale insects on citrus in Egypt. Bulletin
annandalei (Homoptera: Peudocooidae) on grapes in de la Socit Fouad I dEntomologie 22:357395
India. Entomon 22:165166 Shelke RK (2001) Biology and biointensive methods of
Raman KR (1958) A new pest of importance on grapevine management of grapevine mealy bug, Maconellicoccus
in Madurai district. S Indian Hort 6:6466 hirsutus (Green). M.Sc. (Agri.) thesis, Mahatma Phule
Ranga Reddy A, Narayana LK (1986) Biology of Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra (India)
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. Coccinellidae, a Shraiwa H (1935) Studies on mealybugs infesting pear in
predatory beetle of mealybugs. Indian Grape Japan. Kontyu 9:6375
J 2:4052 Shreedhar Rao A, Sreeramalu M, Azam KM (1988)
Ripa SR, Rojas PS (1990) Management and biological Comparison of certain insecticides with other insecti-
control of the white vine mealybug. Revista Fruticola cides against grape mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hir-
11:8287 sutus (Green). Pestology 12(11):2223
Rotundo G, Tremblay E (1972) Studies on a sexual phero- Singh SP (1978) Propagation of a coccinellid beetle for
mone of Planococcus citri (Risso) (Homoptera, the biological control of citrus and coffee mealy bugs.
Coccoidea). I. Bollettino del Laboratorio di In: Scientic conference, CPA Dec 1978, 2 p
Entomologia Agraria Filippo Silvestri Portici Srinivas T, Prasad KS, Shekhar MA, Manjunath D (2007)
30:217230 Evaluation on neem based formulations vis-a-vis
Rotundo G, Tremblay E (1982) Preliminary report on the dichlorvos against Meconellicoccus hirsutus. Uttar
attractivity of the synthetic pheromone of Planococcus Pradesh J Zool 27:1320
38 Fruit Crops: Grapevine 351

Srinivasan TR (1987) Studies on biology and control of Nazionale Italiano di Entomologia, Portiei sorrento,
grape mealybug, Maconelicoccus hirsutus (Green) 1015 May 1976, pp 9193
(Homoptera : Pseudoccoccidae), M.Sc., (Ag.) thesis, Tryapitzyn SV, Tryapitzyn VA (1999) Parasitoids of
TNAU, Madurai, 109 p mealybugs (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae) on culti-
Srinivasan TR, Sundara Babu PC (1989) Field evaluation vated grapes in Argentina, with description of a new
of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant, the coccinel- species of the genus Aenasius Walker (Hymenoptera,
lid predator against grapevine mealybug, Encyrtidae) [Russian]. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green). S Indian Hortic 78(1):174180
37:5051 Verghese A (1997) Colony number, size and reproductive
Stanzin R (1916) The White cochineal of the vine potential of the grape mealybug, Maconellicoccus hir-
(Pseudococcus vitis) in the provinces of Mandaza and sutus (Green) on laboratory host, pumpkin. Insect
La Rioja (Argentina). Int Nat Rev Sci Pract Agric Environ 2(4):139140
Rome VII:173 Walton VM, Pringle KL (1999) Effects of pesticides used
Su TH, Wang CM (1988) Control measure for the citrus on table grapes on the mealybug parasitoid
mealybugs and latania scale insects of grapevine. Coccidoxenoides peregrinus (Timberlake)
Plant Prot Bull (Taiwan) 30(3):279288 (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). S Afr J Enol Viticult
Subba Rao BR, Sangwar HS, Abbasi OA, Singh Y, Ksheer 20:3134
Sagar AM (1965) New records of hymenopterous Walton VM, Pringle KL (2001) Effects of pesticides and
parasites of Nipaecoccus vaster Maskell (Homp. fungicides used on grapevines on the mealybug preda-
Coccidae) a serious pest of citrus from India. Indian tory beetle Nephus boschianus (Coccinellidae,
J Entamol 22:109110 Scymnini). S Afr J Enol Viticul 22:107110
Sunitha ND, Jagginavar SB, Biradar AP (2009) Walton VM, Pringle KL (2004) A survey of mealybugs
Bioefcacy botanicals and newer insecticides against and associated natural enemies in vineyards in the
grapevine mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus Western Cape Province, South Africa. S Afr J Enol
(Green). Karnataka J Agric Sci 22(3):710711 Viticul 25:2325
Swart PL, Barnes BN (1975) Improved mealybug control Walton VM, Daane KM, Pringle KL (2004) Monitoring
on table grapes with a quick-breakdown insecticide. Planococcus cus in South African vineyards with sex
Decid Fruit Grow 25(1):4, 68 pheromone-baited traps. Crop Prot 23:10891096
Swart PL, Barnes BN (1976) Mealybug on table grapes: a Whitehead VB (1961) Insect enemies of the mealybug on
most effective insecticide for the control of the vine grapevines. Decid Fruit Grow 10:123127
mealybug, and the economic implications of three- Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
and four-spray programs. Decid Fruit Grow Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
26(10):378382 London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Tejkumar S, Aftab Ahmed M, Dhramaraju E (1977) Willink MCG, Scatoni IB, ETerra AL, Frioni MI (1997)
Occurrence of the mealy bug, Pseudococcus spp. A Cochinillas harinosas (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae)
serious pest of grapevine around Hyderabad. Indian que afectan plantas cultivadas y silvestres en Uruguay.
J Entamol 39:189190 Agrociencia Montevido 1:96100
Thiem H (1925) The most important coccids injurious to Wunn H (1928) Observations on coccids Bad. 81. Z
orchards and vineyards in Germany Biol. Reiehsanst, Angew Ent ii(6):321322
Land-u-Forstw. Flugbl 77:4 Zhang AJ, Amalin D, Shirali S, Serrano MS, Franqui RA,
Tipping C, Bikoba V, Chander GJ, Mitcham EJ (2003) Oliver JE, Klun JA, Aldrich JR, Meyerdirk DE,
Efcacy of Silwet L-77 against several arthropod pests Lapointe SL (2004) Sex pheromone of the pink hibis-
of table grape. J Econ Entomol 96(1):246250 cus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus, contains an
Tranfaglia A, Viggiani G (1981) Problems of integrated unusual cyclobutanoid monoterpene. Proc Natl Acad
control in vine-growing in Italy. Bollettino di Zoologia Sci U S A 101:96019606
Agraria e di Bachicoltura 16:8589 Zillig H, Neimeyer L (1929) An outbreak of the mealy-
Transfaglia A (1976) Considerationson the morphological bug, Phenacoccus hystrix (Bar) in the vine region of
afnities between Planococcus citri and P. cus (SigJ Mmosel. Saar and Ruwere Aab Biol Reichsanst
(Homoptera : CoecoideaL In Alii XI Congresso XVII:67102
Fruit Crops: Citrus
39
C.N. Rao, V.J. Shivankar, K.J. David, M. Mani,
and A. Krishnamoorthy

39.1 Mealybug Species pink hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsu-


tus, the spherical mealybug, Nipaecoccus viridis,
Mealybugs have become an increasing threat to the striped mealybug, Ferrisia virgata and the
the cultivation of citrus, causing serious losses oriental mealybug, Planococcus lilacinus are
throughout the world (Table 39.1). Among them, important in India. Planococcus citri is univer-
the citrus mealybug (CM), Planococcus citri, the sally present on citrus.

Life stages of Planococcus citri

Adult male Adult female Egg mass Nymphs

C.N. Rao (*) V.J. Shivankar K.J. David M. Mani A. Krishnamoorthy


Central Citrus Research Institute, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Nagpur 440033, India Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: nandikesh70@gmail.com

Springer India 2016 353


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_39
354 C.N. Rao et al.

Table 39.1 List of mealybug species recorded on citrus in different regions of the world
Species Region/Country References
Crisicoccus matsumotoi (Siraiwa) India Williams (2004)
Philippines Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) India Williams and Watson (1988)
Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Middle East Ben-Dov (1994)
Columbia Kondo et al. (2008)
USA Ben-Dov (1994)
Japan Borchsenius (1956); Ben-Dov (1994)
Russia Borchsenius (1949); Borchsenius (1956)
Argentina Granara de Willink (1991)
Crisicoccus chiponensis (Takahashi) Taiwan Williams (2004)
Crisicoccus matsumotoi India Williams (2004)
(Siraiwa)
Dysmicoccus lepelleyi (Betrem) Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus debregeasiae (Green) India, Bangladesh, Williams (2004)
Nepal, Sri Lanka
Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Beardsley India Williams and Watson (1988),
Williams and Granara de Willink (1992),
Williams (2004)
Australia Ben-Dov (1994), Williams and Watson
(1988)
Brazil Williams and Granara de Willink (1992),
Ben-Dov (1994)
Pakistan Williams (2004)
Philippines, Sicily Ben-Dov (1994)
Ferrisia consobrina Williams and Australia, Ethiopia, Ben-Dov (1994)
Watson Neotropical and Pacic region
Ferrisia terani Argentina Ben-Dov (1994)
Williams and Granara de Willink
Ferrisia malvastra (McDaniel) India Williams and Watson (1988), Williams
and Granara de Willink (1992), Williams
(2004)
Australia Williams and Watson (1988)
South Africa Ben-Dov (1991), Ben-Dov (1994)
Argentina Williams and Granara de Willink (1992);
Ben-Dov (1994)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) India Ali (1968), Williams and Watson (1988),
Williams and Granara de Willink (1992),
Williams (2004), Mani and
Krishnamoorthy (2008)
Australia Williams (1985), Ben-Dov (1994)
South Africa Ben-Dov (1994)
Columbia Kondo et al. (2008)
Bangladesh Williams (2004)
USA Ben-Dov (1994)
Argentina Granara de Willink (1979/1991)
(continued)
39 Fruit Crops: Citrus 355

Table 39.1 (continued)


Species Region/Country References
Formicococcus latens sp. n. India Williams (2004)
Formicococcus robustus India Williams (2004)
(Ezzat and McConnell) Bangladesh Williams (2004), Ben-Dov (1994)
Geococcus citrinus Kuwana China, Japan Ben-Dov (1994)
Geococcus coffeae Green India Green (1922)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) India Williams (1996), Williams (2004),
Williams and Watson (1988), Williams
(1985), Mani and Krishnamoorthy (1999)
Australia Brookes (1964), Williams and Watson
(1988), Ben-Dov (1994)
Kenya Williams (1986a), Ben-Dov (1994)
Central Africa Williams (1986a)
Saudi Arabia Matile-Ferrero (1984)
USA Chang and Miller (1996)
Bangladesh Williams (2004), Ben-Dov (1994)
Columbia Kondo et al. (2008)
Nipaecoccus brasilicus Brazil Ben-Dov (1994)
Williams and Granara de Willink
Nipaecoccus lamentosus (Cockerell) Iran Khalaf and Aberoomand (1989)
Nipaecoccus nipae (Maskell) India Williams and Granara de Willink (1992)
Mexico Williams and Granara de Willink (1992),
Ben-Dov (1994)
USA Ben-Dov (1994)
China Ben-Dov (1994)
Argentina Williams and Granara de Willink (1992),
Ben-Dov (1994)
Portugal Carvalho and Aguiar (1997)
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) India Ali (1957), Williams and Watson (1988),
Mani and Krishnamoorthy (2002)
Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Iraq Abdul Rassoul (1970)
USA Sharaf and Meyerdirk (1987)
Middle East Ben-Dov (1985)
Bangladesh, China, Japan Ben-Dov (1994)
Taiwan Lo and Tao (1966)
Israel Bar Zaki et al. (1988)
Jordan Sharaf (1997)
Bhutan Williams (2004)
Paracoccus burnerae (Brain) India Ben-Dov (1994)
South Africa Ben-Dov (1994)
Yemen Marotta et al. (2001)
Paracoccus glaucus (Maskell) New Zealand Ben-Dov (1994)
Paracoccus interceptus Lit India Williams (2004)
Malaysia, Thailand Williams (2004)
Philippines Lit (1997)
(continued)
356 C.N. Rao et al.

Table 39.1 (continued)

Species Region/Country References


Paracoccus marginatus Mexico Miller and Miller (2002)
(Williams and Granara de Willink) USA Ben-Dov (1994),
Miller and Miller (2002)
Ghana Cham et al. (2011)
Palau Muniappan et al. (2006)
Florida Walker et al. (2003)
Sri Lanka Galanihe et al. (2010)
Paracoccus tripurae Williams India Williams (2004)
Phenacoccus madeirensis Green Many countries Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero Ethiopia and Ben-Dov (1994)
Neotropical region
Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley India Suresh and Chandra Kavitha (2008)
Pakistan Arif et al. (2009)
USA McKenzie (1967)
Phenacoccus solani Ferris Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus tucumanus Neotropical Ben-Dov (1994)
Granera de Willink
Planococcus citri (Risso) India Williams (2004), Ben-Dov (1994);
Krishnamoorthy and Singh (1987)
Australia Williams (1985); Ben-Dov (1994)
South Africa Ben-Dov (1994)
USA Ben-Dov (1994)
Argentina Granara de Willink (1991); Ben-Dov
(1994)
Morocco Abdelkhalek et al. (1998)
Hawaii Bartlett (1977)
Queensland Murray (1978)
Black Sea coast Rubtsov (1954)
France Pussard (1938); Panis (1979)
Spain Martinez-Ferrer et al. (2003)
Italy Ortu and Pruta (1985)
Israel Bartlett (1977)
Portugal Ferriera (1939)
Peru Bartlett (1977)
Chile Gonzalez and Rojas (1966)
Palestine Bodenheimer (1951)
Cyprus Krambias and Kontzonis (1980)
Greece Argyriou (1974)
Brazil Gravena (2003)
Sudan Tag Elsir and Osman (2011)
Turkey Ozkan et al. (2001)
Bermuda Bartlett (1977)
Portugal Franco and Marotta (1999)
Yemen Marotta et al. (2001)
European Russia, Soviet Niyazov (1969)
Central Asia, Turkmenia,
Georgia
Pl. kraunhiae (Kuwana) California Smith and Armitage (1931)
(continued)
39 Fruit Crops: Citrus 357

Table 39.1 (continued)


Species Region/Country References
Planococcus minor (Maskell) India Williams (2004); Ben-Dov (1994)
Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Fiji Williams and Watson (1988); Ben-Dov
(1994)
Madagascar Ben-Dov (1994)
Mexico Williams and Granara de Willink (1992);
Ben-Dov (1994)
Uruguay Granara de Willink et al. (1997)
New Zealand Williams and Butcher (1987); Cox (1987)
Argentina Granara de Willink (1991)
Planococcus lilacinus (Ckll.) India Mani (1995a, b)
Philippines Williams (2004)
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcoides robustus Bangladesh, India, Pakistan Williams (2004)
(Ezzat and McConnell )
Plotococcus minutus (Hempel) Brazil Ben-Dov (1994)
Plotococcus neotropicus Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
Williams de Granara
Pseudococcus baliteus Lit and India, Thailand, Indonesia, Williams (2004)
Calilung Vietnam
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel India Williams (2004)
(Pseudococcus citriculus Green) Sri Lanka Green (1922)
Pseudococcus citriculus Green USA Williams and Granara de Willink (1992)
Micronesia Beardsley (1966)
Israel Blumberg et al. (1999a, b))
Bhutan, Bangladesh, Williams (2004)
Indonesia, Nepal, Philippines,
Malaysia, Sri Lanka
Israel Ragusa and Swirski (1977)
Japan Itioka and Inoue (1996)
Israel Rosen (1967)
Pseudococcus calceolariae (Mask.) California Luck and Forster (2003)
New Zealand Cox (1977)
Italy Rotundo et al. (1980)
Portugal Franco and Marotta (1999)
Pseudococcus comstocki (Kuwana) Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel India, Thailand Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus fragilis Brain Italy Viggiani (1970)
California Smith and Armitage (1931)
Abkhazia Stephanov (1935)
Italy Viggiani (1970)
(continued)
358 C.N. Rao et al.

Table 39.1 (continued)


Species Region/Country References
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni India Williams (2004)
Tozzetti) Australia Williams (1985); Ben-Dov (1994)
Philippines Lit and Calilung (1994)
USA Ben-Dov (1994)
Java Betrem (1937)
China Ben-Dov (1994)
Italy Marotta (1987)
Israel Wysoki et al. (1977)
Morocco De Lepiney and Mineur (1932)
Portugal Franco and Marotta (1999)
Ps. comstocki (Kuw.) California
Pseudococcus kikuyuensis James Sudan,Kenya Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus maritimus Ehrh. USSR Timofeeva (1979)
Pseudococcus odermatti India Williams (2004)
Miller and Williams Hawaii, USA, China, Miller and Williams (1997)
Japan, Bahamas
Pseudococcus pseudolamentosus Java Williams (2004)
Betrem
Pseudococcus trukensis Beardsley Caroline Islands Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) Portugal Franco and Marotta (1999)
(Ps. obscurus (Maskell)) California Bartlett (1977)
Puto yuccae (Coquillet) Texas Ben-Dov (1994)
Rastrococcus iceryoides (Green) India Ali (1968), Sinha et al. (1985), Williams
(1989); Williams (2004), Ben-Dov (1994)
Kenya Williams (1989)
Bangladesh Williams (2004), Williams (1989),
Ben-Dov (1994)
Sri Lanka Green (1922), Williams (2004), Ben-Dov
(1994)
China Ben-Dov (1994)
Rastrococcus invadens Williams India Williams (1989), Ben-Dov (1994)
Ghana Williams (1989), Ben-Dov (1994)
Bangladesh Ben-Dov (1994)
Sri Lanka Williams (1989), Williams (2004),
Ben-Dov (1994)
Africa Williams (1986b)
Rastrococcus mangiferae (Green) India Ali (1968), Ben-Dov (1994), Williams
(2004)
Sri Lanka Green (1896), Ben-Dov (1994), Williams
(2004)
Malaysia, China Ben-Dov (1994)
Rastrococcus rubellus Williams Malaysia, Indonesia Williams (2004)
Rastrococcus spinosus (Robinson) India Williams (1989), Williams (2004)
Bangladesh Williams (1989), Williams (2004)
Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam Williams (2004)
Rastrococcus vicorum Williams and Malaysia Williams (2004)
Watson
Rhizoecus kondonis Kuw. Japan, China Kawai and Takagi (1971)
Huang et al. (1983)
39 Fruit Crops: Citrus 359

39.2 Damage with mealybugs and sooty mould lose the mar-
ket value (Bindra 1970; Rao et al. 2001). In
Nymphs and adult mealybugs suck the sap from recent years, the incidence of mealybugs caus-
shoot, leaf, bark, stem, owers and fruits. Fruit ing losses to citrus has been reported from pen-
production is often adversely affected due to insular India (Krishnamoorthy and Singh
the mealybug damage in citrus. There is an 1987), the north-east region (Pathak et al. 1999;
upward trend in the build-up of mealybugs Shylesha and Pathak 1999) and Punjab (Arora
adversely affecting the growth of citrus plants et al. 1999) on different citrus cultivars.
of all ages from young seedlings to grown-up Maconellicoccus hirsutus is known to inject
trees, which occasionally attain epidemic forms toxic saliva into the plant while feeding, which
in citrus. In addition, the sticky honeydew results in malformation of leaf and shoot
excreted by the mealybugs serves as a substrate growth, stunting and occasional death. Leaves
for the growth of sooty mould interfering with show a characteristic curling, while heavily
photosynthesis (Butani and Srivastava 1999). infested plants have shortened internodes lead-
The mealybug infestation on citrus plants ing to resetting or a bunchy top appearance
ranged from 38 to 65 % in India. Fruits covered (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 1999).

N. viridis on lime P. citri on lime F. virgata on pomelo M. hirsutus on lime

39.3 Seasonal Incidence population densities (Meyerdirk et al. 1981). In


grapefruit groves, mealybugs persist in high
Mealybugs are most common during the spring numbers throughout the summer and into the fall.
and early summer. Several overlapping genera- Reproduction in the greenhouse can occur year-
tions occur in a year. Mealybugs prefer humid round, leading to continuous populations of
conditions and are most often found in groves mealybugs. In India, F. virgata was found
planted on heavier soils or closely planted trees throughout the year though it prefers dry weather,
where a great deal of tree shading occurs. and a prolonged period of drought may result in
Damage is most severe during summer months. heavy outbreak of pest, when the insects move
In central India, the pest incidence was heavy even more below and inhabit the roots (Butani
during FebruaryMay (74.89100 %) and low and Srivastava 1999).
during monsoon, which is during August
October (57 %). Heavy infestation during April
May causes more than 50 % fruit drop of Ambia 39.4 Natural Enemies
(Kalidas and Shivankar 1994). In North Eastern
Hilly region of India, 2.974.3 % infestation was Several natural enemies have been identied that
recorded on various citrus species (Pathak et al. are effective in controlling the citrus mealybug.
1999). For sampling underneath, the calyx is the Leptomastidea abnormis (Girault), Leptomastix
best place to search when there are extremely low dactylopii Howard, Chrysoplatycerus splendens
360 C.N. Rao et al.

Howard and Anagyrus pseudococci (Girault) are Nephus sp., Chrysopa sp., Micraspis cardoni
common wasps of P. citri. Some mealybugs are (Wse.), Pseudaspidimerus uttami Kap.,
susceptible to infections by the entomopatho- Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. and Spalgis
genic fungus, Entomophthora fumosa. Common epeus Westwood were recorded on mealybugs
predators include the brown lacewing, in Kodagu, Karnataka (Singh 1990).
Sympherobius barberi (Banks), and the green Coccidoxenoides perminutus (Timberlake),
lacewing, Chrysopa lateralis Gurin, trash bugs, Mallada boninensis (Okamoto), Plesiachrysa
syrphid y larvae, and the scale-eating caterpil- lacciperda (Kimmins), Anisochrysa basalis
lar, Laetitia coccidivora, the Australian ladybird Walker and Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.)
beetle, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant, the (Krishnamoorthy and Mani 1988a,1989a, b;
little mealybug-eating lady beetle, Decadiomus Krishnamoorthy and Mani 1988b) were
bahamicus (Casey) and the pictured ladybeetle, recorded in Karnataka. In Assam, C. montrouz-
Scymnus avifrons Melsheimer, which feed pri- ieri and Entomophthora fumosa Speare were
marily on mealybugs. Two other lady beetles, observed on P. citri (Chowdhury and Majid
Chilocorus stigma (Say) and Olla abdominalis 1954). In central India, Cacoxenus perspicax
var. plagiata (Say), occasionally feed on mealy- and Promuscidea unfasciativentris were
bugs (Muma 1954). observed on P. citri. C. montrouzieri is known to
In India, Anagyrus sp., Blepyrus insularis consume about 3,300 eggs of P. citri. The eggs
(Cam.), Diversinervus sp., Tetrastichus sp., as well as other stages of mealybug are essential
Microterys sp., Cryptochaetum sp., Scymnus in the diet for successful development of the
coccivora Ayyar, Pullus pallidicollis Mst., predator (Oncuer and Bayhan 1982).

Cryptolaemus on P. citri Adult Cacoxenus perspicax Maggot C. perspicax

Scymnus larva on P. citri Mallada larva on P. citri Cryptolaemus on P. citri


39 Fruit Crops: Citrus 361

39.5 Varietal Tolerance/ 39.6.2 Cultural Control


Susceptibilty
Processes such as pruning of affected shoots dur-
In Meghalaya, three micropropagated varieties, ing winter, opening up of the canopy from the
namely Assam lemon (Citrus limon (L.) Burm. centre to allow sufcient sunlight interception
f.), Satkara (C. macroptera Montrouz) and below the canopy, destruction of ant colonies in
pumelo (C. grandis Osbeck), were found to be the orchards as they act as the carriers of mealy-
highly resistant to P. citri (2.9517.72 % leaf bugs to their feeding sites and raking of the soil
infestation), which can be used as rootstock. Soh around the trunk during summer months help in
bitara (C. sinensis L.) and sweet lime (Sour the desiccation of eggs and exposure of the mealy
mutant) (C. limmettioides Tanaka) were found to bugs to natural enemies. The smearing of sticky
be moderately resistant (20.6530 % leaf infesta- band of 78 cm around the trunk at about 0.5 m
tion) and Indian wild orange (C. indica Tanaka) height from the ground during the second week
was found to be moderately susceptible. The of December helps to trap the ascending nymphs,
varieties Jaintia lemon, C. limon, Khasi papeda, and the debarking and destruction of the harbour-
C. latipes (Swingle) Tanaka, Adajamir, C. assa- ing population help in checking the pest
mensis R.M.Dutta and Bhattacharya, Volkamer (Shivankar and Shyam Singh 2000; Michelakis
lemon, C. volkameriana Tan. and Pasq., Khasi and Hamid 1995). Thorough cleaning of equip-
mandarin, C. reticulata Blanco and Sohmyndong ment and harvest materials helps in preventing
and C. jambhiri Lush were found to be highly the spread of mealybugs from an infested grove
susceptible to P. citri and suffered 61.274.3 % to other plant parts (Kerns et al. 2004). In
foliage infestation (Pathak et al. 1999). California, banding the trees with sticky tree-
tangle foot or baiting for ants is recommended to
protect citrus plants from the Argentine ants that
39.6 Management interfere with the activity of natural enemies

An integrated approach is needed to manage the


mealybugs in citrus orchards (Franco et al. 2004). 39.6.3 Chemical Control

Chemical control of citrus mealybugs is often an


39.6.1 Monitoring inefcient management strategy due to their
habit of hiding in crevices between foliage and
Sampling of the mealybugs prior to fruit coloni- fruit. Horticultural soaps and oils can be effective
zation is difcult during the spring and it is an in controlling mealybugs; they are most effective
obstacle to mealybug management. Monitoring if applied before an infestation. Applying soaps
population densities is based on the male capture and oils kills mealybugs that are exposed, but
using traps baited with female sex pheromones. may not reach those that are hidden in well-
At the orchard level, the diverse population den- concealed areas. High-pressure water sprays are
sity between the plots allowed signicant linear moderately effective in achieving control. A
relationship in certain trapping periods between powerful force pump and penetrating insecticide
male capture and fruit infestation. Information can be used to control mature insect populations.
on the level of male capture in spring or early Repeated application of horticultural soaps for
summer by application of pheromone traps may young insects has also been recommended. Pre-
be used to predict the mealybug density or the and post-bloom spray applications are recom-
percentage of fruit infestation and consequently mended for management of mealybugs.
to assist in the decision-making for the purpose Applications made before spring ush have been
of citrus mealybug (CM) management (Franco found to be the most effective strategy for citrus
et al. 2001). mealybug management. After the spring ush,
362 C.N. Rao et al.

sprays should be applied immediately after most Chemical control of Pseudococcus longispi-
of the eggs have hatched to prevent the crawlers nus was most effective if sprays were applied
from hiding themselves in crevices when the mealybugs were in the dispersive
The intervention threshold for P. citri on crawler stage and when the food-plant afforded
Nagpur mandarin was reported to be 510 % the least shelter. A two-spray programme with
infested fruits in summer and 15 % infested fruits applications in August and late November effec-
in autumn (Shivankar and Shyam Singh 2000). tively controlled a dense infestation on citrus. An
Spraying of 1.5 ml dimethoate + 2.5 ml kerosene overall pest management programme has been
oil in 1 l water or 1 ml carbaryl + 1 ml kerosene developed for citrus, in which all the insect pests
oil or 2 ml malathion in 1 l water checks mealy are controlled by combinations of natural ene-
bugs effectively. Spraying with chlorpyriphos mies and insecticides as required. Outbreaks of
0.05 %, carbaryl 0.1 % or fenitrothion 0.05 % Ps. longispinus and other secondary pests are
(Jadhav et al. 1997; Jadhav and Pujari 1999) and controlled by sprays of aminocarb and metho-
also with 2 ml dichlorvos + 25 g sh oil rosin myl. These two insecticides prevented the resur-
soap in 1 l water resulted in 75 % of reduction in gence of the mealybug in the subsequent
mealybug population. Since the pest harbours generation that occurred when malathion was
under the loose bark, debarking by treating with used (Furness 1977). N. viridis is susceptible to
chlorpyriphos and methyl parathion (both at 4 treatments of methidathion and chlorpyriphos.
ml/l) helps in minimizing the pest population On heavy infestations, repeated treatments are
(Mani and Krishnamoorthy 1996). The settling of essential (Bar Zaki et al. 1988). Effective control
crawlers on the plant was reduced by swabbing it was achieved by Mospilan (acetamiprid 20 solu-
with carbaryl (1 %), used for trunk borer man- ble powder (SP)) 0.05 % and 0.075 % sprayed on
agement (Shylesha and Pathak 1999). small fruits or by 0.3 % chlorpyrifos at both
Chlorpyriphos performs very well against the cit- stages of the development of N. viridis (Gross
rus mealybug; but, since this product is especially et al. 2000).
harmful to parasitoids, it is not considered to
have a good t in the integrated pest management
(IPM) programmes, where parasitoid conserva- 39.6.4 Insect Growth Regulators
tion is emphasized.
Citrus oil mixed with chlorobenzilate is effec- Buprofezin, an insect growth regulator, showed
tive against rst-instar nymphs of the mealybugs strong ovicidal activity resulting in more than 80
in an integrated control programme (Meyerdirk % inhibition of egg hatch and 9199 % nymphal
et al. 1981). On grapefruit in the Spanish Province mortality of P. citri (Mendel et al. 1991). It was
of Castellon against Planococcus citri, spot treat- an effective treatment and should be considered
ments on the trunks and main branches of the trees for the citrus mealybug control to avoid destruc-
provided complete control. The products tested tion of parasitoids.
contained 50 % fenitrothion, a mixture of 50 % The addition of narrow-range crop oil, NR-415
fenitrothion + 40 % dimethoate, 50 % omethoate, at 1.0 gal/ac, appeared to be benecial for initial
40 % methidathion, 40 % dimethoate or 50 % mealybug knock-down, especially for the slower-
dichlorvos (Limon de la Oliva et al. 1972). In acting insecticides such as buprofezin. ZR-777
California, dimethoate remained effective for 3 (prop-2-ynyl 3,7,11-trimethyl-(2E,4E)-dodecadi-
months against Planococcus citri (Risso), a seri- enoate), which exhibits high morphogenetic
ous pest attacking the greenhouse crops. activity against the species of Homoptera, gave
Soil injection of imidacloprid (Admire) at 16 good control of nymphs in all instars receiving
and 32 oz/ac appeared to have a very good activ- 0.01 % sprays (Staal et al. 1973). In grapefruit
ity against P. citri (Kerns et al. 2004). orchards, 0.0250.10 % kinoprene, 0.025 %
39 Fruit Crops: Citrus 363

CGA-13353 [ethyl 3-methyl-4-[4-(phenylmethyl) nymphs and least effective against adults (French
phenoxy]-2-butenoate] and 0.0250.10 % and Reeve 1979). In Egypt, the insect growth
epofenonane (Ro 103108) gave good control of regulator methoprene (Altosid) applied by spray-
citrus mealybugs compared to the control that ing on the infested citrus leaves at 0.01 and
was obtained with 0.06 % dimethoate. In tests on 0.05 % gave satisfactory suppression of popula-
the efcacy against specic life stages, both tions of the citrus pest Planococcus citri.
insect growth regulators and conventional insec- Concentrations of 0.1 and 0.5 % gave 100 % sup-
ticides were most effective against rst-instar pression of mealybugs (Hamdy 1984).

Leptomastix dactylopii

39.6.5 Biological Control Greece, Guernsey, Ireland, Italy, Jersey,


Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia,
Pesticides were frequently used, often unsuccess- Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Tunisia,
fully to control the citrus mealybugs (Shrewsbury UK indoors/outdoors and Mediterranean area.
et al. 2004). On the other hand, natural enemies The Brazilian encyrtid parasitoid, Leptomastix
proved to be effective against several mealybug dactylopii How., is a highly specialized parasit-
species attacking citrus. oid of the citrus mealybug Planococcus citri. It is
a very efcient parasitoid and particularly good
39.6.5.1 Citrus Mealybug at seeking out mealybugs in their natural hiding
Planococcus citri places. Because of this trait, Leptomastix is able
The encyrtids, Leptomastidea abnormis and to control mealybugs in low-density infestations.
Leptomastix dactylopii, and the coccinellid, This parasitoid multiplied in 1520-day-old P.
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, are the three natural citri (Krishnamoorthy 1988) and P. lilacinus
enemies frequently used for biological control of (Mani 1995a). The mummies of L. dactylopii
the citrus mealybug Planococcus citri (Cadee could be stored for about 20 days at 15 C and
et al. 1997). These three encyrtids are used in 7080 % RH. It is to be released at 7,500 wasps/
several countries including Austria, Belgium, ha as three releases of 2,500 wasps/ha at intervals
Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, of 2 weeks.
364 C.N. Rao et al.

California Florida
Biological control efforts against the citrus C. montrouzieri was introduced into Florida in
mealybugs, chiey P. citri, in California started 1930 for the control of P. citri on citrus and bulbs.
with the introduction of C. montrouzieri in 1891 Despite permanent establishment, it failed to sur-
1892. It readily cleaned up the infestations but vive in sufcient numbers from year to year for
subsequently proved to be generally slow in adequate control (Bishop 1931; Watson 1932;
response and unable to survive in winter eventu- Muma 1954).
ally persisting only along the coast (Clausen
1915). Complete control of P. citri in some Hawaii
orchards in California was obtained with the con- P. citri was partially controlled by C. montrouz-
tinued liberations of large numbers of C. mon- ieri that was accidentally introduced in Hawaii
trouzieri (Smith 1919). After being colonized in (Bartlett 1977).
citrus mealybug-infested orchards in California,
these ladybird beetles sometimes showed remark- USSR
able ability to destroy many kinds of mealybugs C. montrouzieri was used to control P. citri in
(Hoyt 1912). Later, great interest was stimulated Black Sea coast (Rubtsov 1954). In the Soviet
in this method of periodic colonization. Union, Planococcus citri (Risso) is injurious to
Subsequently, many insectaries were established over 20 species of plants, including Citrus. The
and periodic colonization of Cryptolaemus main parasite of P. citri is Anagyrus pseudococci
reached a peak in the 1920s against citrus mealy- (Gir.), which occurs in the south of European
bugs. Ten beetles per tree during summer were Russia and in Soviet Central Asia and which
adequate for the control of most of the infesta- destroys up to 75 % of the coccid population in
tions of the mealy bugs. More than 40 million areas not treated with insecticides. Allotropa
beetles were released over some 50,000 acres of mecrida (Wlk.), the second most important para-
citrus during 19261927 (Essig 1931). In 1928, site, was reared from the coccid in Turkmenia in
over 42 million beetles were released in citrus in 1967 and is responsible for up to 20 % parasitism
California. An average of 23 adults were released in Georgia. In 1960, Leptomastidea abnormis
per tree and over one million trees received lib- (Gir.) and Leptomastix dactylopii. How were
erations (Beckley 1956). In addition, the number introduced into Georgia and subsequently into
of outbreaks of P. citri was reduced due to the Turkmenia from the United States (Niyazov
presence of Cryptolaemus (Clausen 1956). The 1969).
outstanding reduction in citrus mealybug was
related to the peak period of Cryptolaemus activ- France
ity. The predator was more active in late April C. montrouzieri was introduced in France from
and the activity started decreasing in June as the California in July 1918 against P. citri (Turinetti
mealybug population declined (Bartlett 1957). It 1921). The predator became established and pro-
was, however, rated as partial control (Debach duced a marked reduction in the numbers of P.
and Hagen 1964). In the later years, the citrus citri. But its overwinter survival was low
mealybug was kept under check by the periodic (Marchal 1921; Anonymous 1922; Poutiers
colonization of C. montrouzieri along with the 1922; Marchal and Pussard 1938). An outbreak
encyrtid Leptomastix dactylopii Howard of P. citri at Cap dAntibes was checked by C.
(Beckley 1960). The Brazilian encyrtid parasit- montrouzieri without any liberation of the preda-
oid, Leptomastix dactylopii How., was utilized in tor at that time. It might be due to the develop-
the suppression of the mealy bug Planococcus ment of adapted strain from the beetles released
citri in USA (Fisher 1963). earlier in the 1920s (Pussard 1938).
39 Fruit Crops: Citrus 365

Spain Introduction of C. montrouzieri from Sicily into


Planococcus citri is a major pest of citrus in Campania region of mainland Italy was made.
Spain (Martinez-Ferrer et al. 2003). C. montrouz- Since 1973, the predator survived at released sites
ieri became established some time before 1928 and spread subsequently to a large citrus area of
and good results were obtained. Periodic coloni- Angri-Corbera. In 1977, Cryptolaemus was found
zation was also successful in controlling the to be abundant in this area and some localities
mealybug (Gomez 1932). Repeated releases of around Portici (Mazzone 1977). In Sardinia,
C. montrouzieri, when the mealybug resumes 12,000 individuals of the coccinellid were liber-
activity after winter, were suggested (Limon de ated in ve releases. The use of C. montrouzieri
la Oliva and Blasco Pasaral 1973). P. citri was and other biocontrol agents led to a drastic reduc-
also controlled by C. montrouzieri in citrus tion in the use of synthetic insecticides against P.
orchards of Valencia except in winter (Carrero citri on citrus (Fronteddu et al. 1996). In Sicily, C.
1981). In Malaga (Spain), the biological control montrouzieri was mass-reared and released against
of P. citri was successful when the infestation P. citri on citrus (Raciti et al. 1995). New introduc-
with citrus mealybug on the fruit became lower tions of Leptomastix dactylopii How. to the
than 5 % for at least 2 months after the C. mon- Campania region of Italy and Sicily were made in
trouzieri release. With the data collected, a prob- 1974, and the encyrtid became established in some
ability model was designed based on the logistic Citrus-growing areas (Mineo and Viggiani 1976).
regression method, which allowed to dene the The Brazilian encyrtid parasitoid, Leptomastix
release doses suitable for every initial-incidence dactylopii How., has been utilized in the suppres-
level of P. citri (Olivero et al. 2003). In Spain, sion of the mealy bug Planococcus citri in the
there were decreasing populations of P. citri due Island of Procida and Italy (Luppino 1979).
to the presence of natural enemies, chiey C.
montrouzieri (Villalba et al. 2006). Israel
Attempts were made to establish C. montrouzieri
Italy by importing it from Egypt in 1924 (Bodenheimer
The permanent establishment of C. montrouzieri and Guttfeld 1929) and later in 1941 and 1958
was achieved in certain warm areas, through a but without success in permanent establishment
number of importations beginning from 1908 (Bartlett 1977).
(Constantino 1935). In Nervi, the predator
although got established and spread, it was not Portugal
found in abundance (Capra 1927; Paoli 1927). In C. montrouzieri was introduced from Spain in
Sicily, C. montrouzieri was released in more than 1929. The released beetles had survived in the
1,000 citrus orchards and satisfactory control was eld and spread but the predator did not give
achieved (Liotta and Mineo 1963). Good control complete control of P. citri (Ferriera 1939).
was also achieved in 1964 when the predator was
liberated in August. After a month, it has spread to Peru
220 yards, and after 2 months to 550 yards provid- The predator, Leptomastix dactylopii, introduced
ing complete control (Liotta and Mineo 1965). from USA did not establish on P. citri on infest-
Thus, the control was achieved by periodic coloni- ing citrus (Wille 1936). Leptomastix dactylopii
zation, which helped to overcome winter mortality has also been used to control P. citri in Peru
(Mineo 1967). In Sardinia, the introduction and (Bartlett 1977).
release of Cryptolaemus with Leptomastix dacty-
lopii have resulted in the reduction of the number Chile
of sprays from three to one in 1981 (Ortu 1982). C. montrouzieri was colonized in 1931, 1933 and
The predator has adapted satisfactorily to the cli- 1939. It proved effective when released in large
mate of Sardinia (Ortu and Pruta 1985). numbers, but it was to be liberated each year
366 C.N. Rao et al.

since it did not establish permanently (Duran declined from 313.84/plant in August 2005 to
1944; Gonzalez and Rojas 1966). 2.63/plant in October 2005 following the release
of C. montrouzieri at 30 larvae/plant in August
Australia 2005 (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 2008). Several
The predator was brought from New South Wales green lace wings preying on mealybugs have
in 1902 to Eastern Australia for the control of the been reported from India (Krishnamoorthy and
citrus mealybugs. It was readily established and Mani 1988a).
effective control was obtained. Its introduction is The encyrtid parasitoid Coccidoxenoides
regarded as the outstanding biological control peminutus played a dominant role in the suppres-
success (Wilson 1960). sion of P. citri on acid lime and lemon in India
(Mani 1994). The parasitoid was multiplied on
South Africa 510-day-old laboratory-bred P. citri. Several
The liberations of C. montrouzieri were made in plant products and deltamethrin were found to be
the citrus mealybug-infested orchards from early safer to C. perminutus. The exotic parasitoid
January, and good control was obtained in every Leptomastix dactylopii was imported from West
instance (Bishop 1931). The biological control of Indies to India during 1983 for trials against P.
the citrus mealybug by C. montrouzieri was rated citri (Nagarkatti et al. 1992). Releases of L. dac-
as complete control in South Africa (Greathead tylopii gave excellent control of P. citri causing
1971). Allotropa kamburovi sp. n., recovered up to 100 % parasitism in citrus orchards in
from Planococcus citri (Risso), is derived from Karnataka (Manjunath 1985; Krishnamoorthy
citrus in Western Transvaal, South Africa and Singh 1987; Nagarkatti et al. 1992;
(Annecke and Prinsloo 1977). Cryptolaemus Krishnamoorthy 1990). L. dactylopii released in
montrouzieri is used in augmentation programme April 1984 was recovered in large numbers from
in the control of P. citri on citrus in South Africa P. citri infesting acid lime and lemon in 1991
(Moore and Hattingh 2004). 1992 (Mani 1994). Later L. dactylopii was recov-
ered from P. citri infesting several horticultural
Palestine crops (Krishnamoorthy and Mani 1989c).
No practical success in the control of P. citri was Dichlorvos, dicofol, several fungicides and plant
observed with C. montrouzieri (Bodenheimer products are safer to L. dactylopii (Mani et al.
1928, 1951). 1993). When L. dactylopii and C. perminutus
were found together, with the latter one playing a
India dominant role in suppressing P. citri. However,
During 19631965, the release of the coccinell- L. dactylopii is known to prefer the late-nymphal
lid, C. montrouzieri, did not result in establish- instars of P. citri (Krishnamoorthy 1988), while
ment in the citrus orchards, located 20 miles C. perminutus is known to attack preferentially
away from Gauhati, India. It might be due to the the early-nymphal instars (Krishnamoorthy and
activity of the ant Oecophylla smaragidina Mani 1988b). L. dactylopii had not displaced the
(Narayanan 1957). A release rate of ten beetles local C. peminutus in Bangalore. Under this situ-
per Coorg mandarin orange tree was suggested ation, C. perminutus was largely responsible for
for the control of citrus mealybug in Karnataka the control of P. citri in both the orchards. Similar
(Singh 1978). Following the release of C. mon- control of P. citri on grapefruit was achieved in
trouzieri at 2000/acre (ac) on acid lime plants, the April when C. perminutus was abundant in
population of mealybug (P. citri) was declined October in Texas (Dean et al. 1971). The same
from 126.64 in August 2003 to 0.4/plant in parasitoid has also been used to control P. citri in
November 2003. A mean of 99.68 % reduction in Peru and Bermuda (Bartlett 1977). In India, the
the mealybug population on acid lime was mealybug infestation was rst noticed in the sec-
achieved by the predator within 3 months of its ond week of February on lemon in India. The
release (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 2007). In the mean number of mealybugs per ve shoots was
pummelo orchard, the population of P. citri 1342.4, and initial samples, collected on 16
39 Fruit Crops: Citrus 367

February 1991, yielded both L. dactylopii and C. main pest of citrus, was controlled by the natural
perminutus. Both the parasitoids were active up enemies including C. montrouzieri (Ozkan et al.
to the second week of May. C. perminutus was 2001).
always found to emerge in larger numbers than L.
dactylopii from all the samples collected from Morocco
February to May. It was particularly abundant in In Morocco, P. citri is a major pest of citrus
March/April, and a mean maximum of 318.5 orchards. The predator C. montrouzieri was used
parasitoids emerged from the samples collected to control the mealybug pest (Abdelkhalek et al.
on 1 April 1991. In the case of L. dactylopii, a 1998).
mean maximum of 49.2 adults were recovered
from the samples collected on 2 March 1991. Bermuda
There was a marked reduction in the mealybug The encyrtid parasitoid L. dactylopii has also been
population, which was negligible in the second used to control P. citri in Bermuda (Bartlett 1977).
week of May.
39.6.5.2 Japanese Mealybug
Cyprus Planoccoccus kraunhiae
C. montrouzieri was imported from California An isolated infestation of P. kraunhiae on citrus
and releases were carried out in 1954 and 1960 disappeared following the release of C. mon-
resulting in temporary establishment, but the bee- trouzieri in Southern California (Smith and
tles did not survive the winter (Greathead 1976). Armitage 1931).
The Brazilian encyrtid parasitoid, Leptomastix
dactylopii How., has been utilized in the suppres- 39.6.5.3 Oriental Mealybug
sion of the mealy bug Pl. citri (Krambias and Planococcus lilacinus
Kontzonis 1980). The oriental mealybug appeared on 3-year-old
acid lime plants at Indian Institute of Horticultural
Greece Research (IIHR) farm, Bangalore in September
P. citri disappeared in 1933 as a pest after the 1998. The initial sampling done on 19th
introduction of the predator from Spain (DeBach September did not yield any natural enemy. Since
and Argyriou 1967; Pelakasis 1974). Recoveries C. montrouzieri is known to feed on P. lilacinus,
were also made following the introductions in releases of C. montrouzieri were made on 20th
1965 and 1969 (Argyriou 1974). September and 10th October at 20/plant. Prior to
the release of the predator, ants attending the
Brazil mealybugs were checked. A mean of 160.50
C. montrouzieri was used as a biological control mealybugs/shoot was observed when the study
agent against P. citri in Brazilian citriculture was initiated. The mealybug population had
(Gravena 2003). The Brazilian encyrtid parasit- started declining following the release of C. mon-
oid, Leptomastix dactylopii, has been utilized in trouzieri. It was found in negligible numbers by
the suppression of the mealy bug Planococcus mid-November 1998 and ceased to be a problem
citri in several countries. from January 1999. The cecidomyiid T. coccidi-
vora was also observed but in negligible numbers
Turkey in India.
C. montrouzieri was introduced into Turkey and The mealybug (P. lilacinus) population was
compared with native races in the control of P. rst observed in April 1991. More than 35 % of
citri in citrus orchards. There were no signicant fruits were found infested with P. lilacinus. The
variations in the cold hardiness, prey consump- population of L. dactylopii ranged from 2.46 to
tion capacity and other biological characteristics 6.00, but T. indica was observed in large numbers
of native and introduced races of C. montrouzieri ranging from 14.45 to 96.00. Due to the action of
(Yigit and Canhilal 1998). In Turkey, P. citri, the both the parasitoids, especially T. indica, the
368 C.N. Rao et al.

mealybug population was reduced by the end of 1931). The application of burlap bands around
July. The mealybug did not appear up to the trunks of infested trees attracted the mealy-
December 1991 (Mani 1995b). The 5-day-old P. bugs to congregate beneath the bands to oviposit.
lilacinus was found suitable for the breeding of T. The bands also attracted the coccinellids, thereby
indica (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 1995). increasing the intensity of predation. In San
Francisco, serious infestations of P. fragilis were
39.6.5.4 Citriculus Mealybug invariably controlled by C. montrouzieri (Smith
Pseudoccoccus cryptus 1928). In Abkhazia of USSR, complete control
(Ps. citriculus) of P. fragilis was secured in 1933 by releasing
In Israel, the imported C. montrouzieri released 1520 adults on severely infested tree or ten
in 1924 did not successfully establish adults on slightly infested tree. The coccinellid
(Bodenhiemer 1928). It was again released in thrived throughout the summer and autumn with-
1941 (Mason 1941) and 1958 (Rosen 1967), but out being affected by high humidity and torren-
there were no reports of permanent establish- tial rain or the maximum temperature of 35 C
ment. Four parasitoid species, Allotropa burrelli, (Stephanov 1935). Also in Chile, C. montrouzieri
A. convexifrons, Pseudaphycus malinus (from was utilized against P. fragilis. Pseudococcus
central Asia) and Anagyrus sawadai (from fragilis is recorded for the rst time in Italy on
Japan), were introduced into Israel during 1996 Citrus in the Province of Salerno in 1969. The
1997 against P. cryptus. Only Allotropa convexi- heaviest infestation was on the fruits of orange,
frons and Anagyrus sawadai successfully lemon and mandarin. P. fragilis appeared to be
parasitized P. cryptus and therefore were released controlled effectively by natural enemies, espe-
in the eld. So far, only A. sawadai has been cially the encyrtid Hungariella pretiosa (Timb.);
recovered. A considerable reduction in popula- Dendrocerus laevis (Ratz.) and an aphelinid of
tion densities of the pest has been recorded since the genus Coccophagus were also recovered
May 1998 in the major release site (Blumberg from the mealybug (Viggiani 1970).
et al. 1999a, 1999b).
Pseudococcus calceolariae
39.6.5.5 Citrophilus Mealybug Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, initially introduced
as a classical biological control agent for
Pseudococcus fragilis Pseudococcus calceolariae, in southern
(= P. citrophilus; P. gahani) California, was unable to survive in sufcient
Release of C. montrouzieri was made in 1916 in numbers to provide control without augmenta-
Southern California and it provided some control tion. C. montrouzieri is still commercially avail-
of P. fragilis. At Los Angles County, 4,000,000 able and being used in citrus to suppress the
adults were released over an area of 4,775 acres mealybug pests (Luck and Forster 2003).
at ten per tree. Although prolonged cool damp
weather at rst delayed the activities, the control 39.6.5.6 Obscure Mealybug
for the season later became entirely satisfactory. Pseudoccoccus obscures (Ps.
Over 350,000 adults were released in 3-weeks viburni)
time against P. fragilis in California. Infestation The mealybug responded well to periodic releases
appears to be less severe than the previous years of C. montrouzieri in citrus orchards of California
(Anonymous 1929). The rst release was sug- (Bartlett 1977).
gested between 1st and 15th April when the eld
temperature was 70 F and rainfall was low. 39.6.5.7 Grape Mealybug
Liberations were continued up to September
(Armitage 1929). The beetles released at rst Pseudococcus maritimus
increased to controlling numbers in the progeny C. montrouzieri did not give sufcient results in
of rst generation of adults. Banding citrus trees the control of P. maritimus on citrus (Timofeeva
beneted C. montrouzieri (Smith and Armitage 1979).
39 Fruit Crops: Citrus 369

Nipaecoccus lamentosus of C. montrouzieri at 30 larvae/plant in August


Nipaecoccus lamentosus (Syn: Pseudococcus (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 2008). Nipaecoccus
lamentosus) has been recorded on limes in Iran. viridis (N. vastator) (Mask.) is considered to be
There were four generations annually in the Fars one of the most serious pests in Iraq, where it
region. Cryptolaemus montrouzieri has been attacks various economic plants especially citrus,
imported from northern Iran and has proved to be mulberry and Ziziphus spp. Peaks of activity by
effective as a biological control agent of P. la- predators and parasites of the mealybug occurred
mentosus (Khalaf and Aberoomand 1989). between 15 May and 15 June for Exochomus
nigripennis (Erichs.), Dicrodiplosis sp., Anagyrus
39.6.5.8 Long-Tailed Mealybug pseudococci (Gir.) and Marietta picta (Andre),
Pseudococcus longispimus and in SeptemberOctober for Nephus bipuncta-
(= P. adonidum) tus (Kug.), Chrysopa sp., Dicrodiplosis sp., A.
Sporadic outbreaks of the mealybug were often pseudococci and M. picta (El-Haidari et al. 1978).
reduced by the imported parasitoids and preda- N. viridis invaded Israel during 1984. Anagyrus
tors including Cryptolaemus (Debach and indicus was introduced in Israel and Jordan. The
Fleschner 1947). C. montrouzieri was used dur- parasitoid has established well on N. viridis in cit-
ing 19591965 against P. longispinus, but the rus plantations in both the countries (Bar Zaki
information was not available regarding the et al. 1988).
establishment (Bartlett 1977). In Italy, C. mon-
trouzieri got established against P. longispinus on 39.6.5.10 Striped Mealybug Ferrisia
oranges (Paoli 1927). But the predator was not virgata
effective against the mealybug in Morocco (De Following the release of C. montrouzieri at 30
Lepiney and Mineur 1932). larvae/plant in August in the pummelo orchard,
the population of F. virgata declined from
39.6.5.9 Spherical Mealybug 248.85 in August to 7.57/plant in October (Mani
Nipaecoccus viridis and Krishnamoorthy 2008) (Table 39.1).
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) was a severe pest
on acid lime in India. Over a dozen parasitoids 39.6.5.11 Pink Hibiscus Mealybug
were recorded on N. viridis in India. Anagyrus Maconellicoccus hirsutus
dactylopii How. was found parasitizing up to 90 Release of C. montrouzieri reduced the mealybug
% in the eld (Ali 1957; Subba Rao et al. 1965). population from 39.4 in January to 1.3 in mid-
A severe infestation of N. viridis (= Pseudococcus March on acid lime in Karnataka, India (Mani
corymbatus) in Andhra Pradesh (India) on citrus and Krishnamoorthy 1999).
was wiped out with the liberation of ten beetles
per tree (Tirumala Rao and David 1958). Breeding
and release of C. montrouzieri were suggested for
obtaining control in early summer when N. viri-
References
dus (= Pseudococcus lamentosus) were high (Lo Abdelkhalek L, Afellah M, Smaili C (1998) Biology and
and Tao 1966). The predator became well estab- biological control of Planococcus citri R. (Hom.,
lished against the mealybug in Hongkong Pseudococcidae) on citrus in the Loukos region of
(Simmonds 1971). The population of N. viridis Morocco [French]. Mededelingen Faculteit
Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische
declined from 221.3 on 16th March to 1.40/plant Wetenschappen. Universiteit Gent 63:483488
on 10th June 1994 due to the action of C. mon- Abdul Rassoul MS (1970) Notes on Nipaecoccus vastator
trouzieri and Anagyrus spp. in acid lime orchard (Maskell) (Coccidae: Homoptera): a serious pest of
in Karnataka, India (Mani and Krishnamoorthy citrus trees and various plants rst record from Iraq.
Bulletin (Iraq Natural History Museum) 4:105108
2002) (Table 39.1). In the pummelo orchard, the Ali SM (1957) Some bio-ecological studies on
population of N. viridis declined from 165.48 in Pseudococcus vastator Mask. (Coccoidea:
August to 6.85/plant in October with the release Hemiptera). Indian J Entomol 19:5458
370 C.N. Rao et al.

Ali SM (1968) Coccids (Coccoidea: Hemiptera: Insecta) Betrem JG (1937) De morporphologie en systematiek van
affecting fruit plants in Bihar (India). J Bombay Nat enkele vande vooraamste witte-luizensoorten van
Hist Soc 65:120137 Java. [Morphology and systematics of some of the
Annecke DP, Prinsloo GL (1977) A new species of principal mealy bug species of Java. (Hom. Cocc.)] (In
Allotropa Foerster (Hymenoptera: Platygasteridae) Dutch; Summary In English). Archief voor de
parasitic in the citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri Kofecultuur in Nederlandsch-Indie 11:1118
(Risso) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), in South Bindra OS (1970) Citrus Decline in India. Jt. Publi. of
Africa. J Entomol Soc South Afr 40(1):105108 PAU/OSU/USAID, Ludhiana, pp 925
Anonymous (1922) Rapports summarires surles Travaux Bishop HJ (1931) Biological control of citrus mealybug.
accomplish dans les laboratories at comptes rendus Fmg S Afr Reprint No. 64, 7 p
des missiiars dEtudes. Ann Epiphyties Paris Blumberg D, Ben-Dov Y, Gross S, Drishpoun Y, Mendel
XII:421441 Z (1999a) Outbreaks and biological control of the cit-
Anonymous (1929) County agricultural commissioners riculus mealybug Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel in
notes. Mon Bull Dept Agric Calif 19:373380 Israel in the past and present revaluation and current
Argyriou LC (1974) The coccoids of citrus in Greece. Ab situation. [Hebrew]. Alon Hanotea 53(4):155160
Awamia 37:5765 Blumberg D, Ben-Dov Y, Mendel Z (1999b) The citricu-
Arif MI, Raq M, Ghaffar A (2009) Host plants of cotton lus mealybug Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel and its
mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis): a new menace to natural enemies in Israel- History and present situa-
cotton agroecosystem of Punjab. Pak Int J Agric Biol tion. Entomol Exp Appl 33:233242
11:163167 Bodenheimer FS (1928) Contributions towards the knowl-
Armitage HM (1929) Timing of eld liberations of edge of citrus insects in Palestine 1. Preliminary report
Cryptolaemus in the control of citrophilus mealybug on the work of the Palestine Breeding Laboratory at
in the infested citrus orchards in Southern California. Petahtikwa, 192427. Palestine Citrogr 1:316
J Econ Entomol 22:910915 Bodenheimer FS (1951) Citrus entomology in the Middle
Arora PK, Batra RC, Sharma DR, Vij VK, Mehrotra NK East with special reference to Egypt, Iran, Palestine,
(1999) Insect pest status in Kinnow mandarian under Syria & Turkey. Dr. W. Junks, S. Gravenhage, p 663
different plant spacing. In: Proceedings international Bodenheimer FS, Guttfeld M (1929) On the possibilities
symposium on citriculture held at Nagpur during, of biological control of Pseudococcus citri Risso in
November 2327, pp 931934 Palestine. Ztschr f Angew Ent 15:67136
Bar Zaki I, Peleg BA, Chen CH (1988) The spherical Borchsenius NS (1949) Insects Homoptera. suborders
mealybug infesting citrus in Israel. In: Goren R, mealybugs and scales (Coccoidea). Family mealybugs
Mendel K (eds) Proceedings of sixth international cit- (Pseudococcidae). Vol. VII. (In Russian). Fauna
rus congress, Tl Aiv, March 611, pp 10831086 SSSR. Zoologicheskii Institut Akademii Nauk
Bartlett BR (1957) Biotic factors in natural control of cit- SSSR. N.S. 38:1382
rus mealybugs in California. J Econ Entomol Borchsenius NS (1956) Contribution to the question of
50:753755 the species composition of scale insects harming citrus
Bartlett BR (1977) Pseudococcidae. In: CP Clausen (ed) in Israel (Insecta, Coccoidea). (In Russian).
Introduced parasites and predators of arthropod pests Zoologicheskii Zhurnal Moscow 35:863867
and weeds a world review. U.S. Department of Brookes HM (1964) The Coccoidea (Homoptera) natu-
Agriculture handbook no. 490, USDA, Washington, ralised in South Australia: a second annotated list.
pp 137169 Trans Roy Soc S Aust 88:1520
Beardsley JW (1966) Insects of Micronesia (Homoptera: Butani DK, Srivastava KP (1999) Citrus entomology. In:
Coccoidea). Insect Micronesia 6:377562 Srivastava KP, Ahlawat YS (eds) Pest management in
Beckley WC (1956) Biological control for 195556, 29th citrus. Research Periodicals and Book Publishing
Annual Report, Associates Insectary, Santa Paula, House, Rainbow Processors and Printers, New Delhi,
California, Oct 31 pp 33171
Beckley WC (1960) Report on biological division for Cadee N, Alphen JJ, Van M (1997) Host selection and sex
195960. 33rd Annual Report, Associates Insectary, allocation in Leptomastidea abnormis, a parasitoid of
Santa Paula, California, Oct 31 the citrus mealybug Planococcus citri. Entomol Exp
Ben-Dov Y (1985) Further observations on scale insects Appl 83(3):277284
(Homoptera: Coccoidea) of the Middle East. Capra F (1927) Aggiunte e correzioni al catalogus
Phytoparasitica 3:185192 Coleopteroum Regionis Palearctidae. Endomychidal e
Ben-Dov Y (1991) First record of Ferrisia consobrina coccinellidae. Bull Soc Entomol Ital 59:152160
Williams & Watson (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Carrero JM (1981) Entomopages of citrus coccids in the
Pseudococcidae) from Southern Africa. J Entomol province of Valencia. In: Proceedings of the interna-
Soc South Afr 54(1):8586 tional symposium IOBC/WPKS on integrated control
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- in agriculture and forestry, Vienna 812 October,
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: 1975, pp 521526
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- Carvalho JP, Aguiar AMF (1997) In: Citrus pests in the
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic Island of Madeira (In Portuguese). Pragas dos citrinos
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
39 Fruit Crops: Citrus 371

na Ilha da Madeira. Secretaria Regional de Agricultura, Franco JC, Marotta S (1999) A survey of mealybugs
Florestas e Pescs, Madeira, 411p (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae) in citrus
Cham D, Davis H, Obeng Ofori D, Owusu E (2011) Host groves in Continental Portugal. Entomologica
range of the newly invasive mealybug species 33:191196
Paracocccus marginatus Williams and Granara De Franco JC, Russo A, Suma P, Silva EB, Dunkelblum E,
Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in two ecologi- Mendel Z (2001) Monitoring strategies for the Citrus
cal zones of Ghana. Res Zool 1(1):17 Mealybug in Citrus orchards. Boll Zool Agrar Bachic
Chang LWH, Miller CE (1996) Pathway risk assessment: 33(3):297303
pink mealybug from the Caribbean. Animal and Plant Franco JC, Suma P, Silva EB, Blumberg D, Mendel Z
Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of (2004) Management strategies of mealybug pests of
Agriculture, Riverdale, 61 p citrus in Mediterranean countries. Phytoparasitica
Chowdhury S, Majid S (1954) Handbook of plant protec- 32:507522
tion. Department of Agriculture, Assam Publication, French JV, Reeve RJ (1979) Insect growth regulators and
Shillong, 177 p conventional insecticides for suppression of citrus
Clausen CP (1915) Mealybugs of citrus treesty. Calif mealybug. Southwest Entomol 4(3):238243
Agric Sta Bull 258:291310 Fronteddu F, Canu D, DAmico R, Delpiano N, Fancello
Clausen CP (1956) Biological control of insect pests in the F, Nanni G (1996) Applications of integrated control
continental United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, methods in citrus cultivation: biotechnical control
California, Technical Bulletin No 1139, 151 p against Ceratitis capitata and biological control of
Constantino G (1935) Unnemicodel contonela degli- Planococcus citri [Italian]. Inf Fitopatol 46:3439
agrumi: Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. Acireale Furness GO (1977) Chemical and integrated control of the
R. Staz. Sper de Fruttic e Agrumic Bol. (n.s.) 6:7 p long-tailed mealybug, Pseudococcus longispinus
Cox J (1977) Survey of mealybug species (Homoptera: (Targioni-Tozzetti) (Hemiptera: Coccidae) in the
Pseudococcidae) in Auckland orchards and vineyards. River land of South Australia. Aust J Agric Res
N Z J Agric Res 20(2):259261 28(2):319332
Cox JM (1987) Pseudococcidae (Insecta: Hemiptera). Galanihe LD, Jayasundera MUP, Vithana A,
Fauna of New Zealand. Duval CT (series ed.), 11. Asselaarachchi N, Watson GW (2010) Occurrence,
DSIR Science Information Publishing Centre, distribution and control of papaya mealybug,
Wellington, New Zealand, 229 p Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae),
De Lepiney J, Mineur JM (1932) Les parasites du an invasive alien pest in Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res
Myoporum dans la region de Rabat. Bull Soc Sci Nat Ext 13(3):8186
Maroc 11:137 Gomez CF (1932) El Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls.
Dean HA, Hart WG, Ingle S (1971) Citrus mealybug, a Parasito del Pseudococcus citri Risso. (ed) Estac.
potential problem on Texas grapefruit. J Rio Grande Fitopatol. Agr. de Lavante Valencia 2, 58 p
Valley Hortic Soc 25:4653 Gonzalez RH, Rojas SP (1966) Estudio analitoco del con-
DeBach P, Argyriou LC (1967) The colonization and suc- trol biologico de plages Agricolas en Chile. Agric
cess in Greece of some imported Aphytis spp. (Hym. Tech 26:133147
Aphelinidae) parasitic on citrus scale insects. (Hom. Granara de Willink MC (1979) Contribucin al estudio de
Diaspididae). Enomophaga 12:325342 las cochinillas harinosas (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae)
DeBach P, Fleschner CA (1947) Biological control of en ctricos de la Provincia de Tucumn. (In Spanish;
long tailed mealybug. Calif Citrag 33:2224 Summary In English). Jornados Fitosanitarias
DeBach P, Hagen KS (1964) Manipulation of entomopha- Argentinas 1:125160
gous species. In: Debach P (ed) Biological control of Granara de Willink MC (1991) Economically important
insect pests and weeds. Chapman and Hall Ltd., mealybugs found in Argentina: recent species and new
London, pp 429458 list of hosts. (In Spanish). Boletin de la Academia
Duran ML (1944) Natural enemies of the genus Nacional de Ciencias (Cordoba, Argentina)
Pseudococcus established in Chile. Ag Tec (Santiago, 59(3/4):259271
Chile) 4:102 Granara de Willink MC, Scatoni IB, Terra AL, Frioni MI
El-Haidari HS, Aziz FI, Wahab WA (1978) Activity of (1997) Mealybugs (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae) that
predators and parasites of the mealybug, Nipaecoccus affect crops and wild plants in Uruguay, updated list
vastator (Maskell) in Iraq [Arabic]. Yearbook of Plant of the host plants.]. (In Spanish). Agrociencia
Protection Research, Iraq Ministry of Agriculture and 1(1):96100
Agrarian Reform. 1974/1976, pp 4146 Gravena S (2003) Ecological management of the citrus
Essig EC (1931) A history of entomology. Macmilan Co., mealybug, with emphasis on the biological control by
New York, 1029 p coccinellid species Cryptolaemus montrouzieri
Ferriera L (1939) A luta contra Pseudococcus citri Risso [Portuguese]. Laranja 24:7182
eo problem geral da luta biologica. Palestras Agron Greathead DJ (1971) A review of biological control in the
2:1747 Ethiopian Region. Commonwealth institute of bio-
Fisher TW (1963) Mass culture of Cryptolaemus and logical control technical communication, no. 5.
Leptomastix natural enemies of citrus mealybugs. Bull Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham
Calif Agric Expt No. 797, 39 p Royal, Slough, 162 p
372 C.N. Rao et al.

Greathead DJ (1976) A review of biological control in Krishnamoorthy A (1988) Host range, development and
western and Southern Europe. Commonwealth insti- sex ratio of Leptomastix dactylopii on different stages
tute of biological control technical communication, of citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri. J Biol Control
no. 7. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham 2:811
Royal, 182 p Krishnamoorthy A (1990) Evaluation of permanent estab-
Green EE (1896) Catalogue of Coccidae collected in lishment of Leptomastix dactylopii (How.) against
Ceylon. Indian Museum Notes 4:210 Planococcus citrii (Risso) in citrus orchards in India.
Green EE (1922) The Coccidae of Ceylon. Part V. Dulau Fruits 45:2932
& Co., London, pp 345472 Krishnamoorthy A, Mani M (1988a) Records of green
Gross S, Gefen D, Rotman N, Tadmor U, Zemer B, Gotlib lacewings preying on mealybugs in India. Curr Sci
A, Genfen Y (2000) Chemical control of spherical 58:155156
mealybug (Nipaecoccus viridis) (Newstead) in citrus. Krishnamoorthy A, Mani M (1988b) Coccidoxenoides
Alon Hanotea 54:234240 peregrina: a new parasitoid of Planococcus citri in
Hamdy MK (1984) On the effectiveness of Altosid against India. Curr Sci 58:466
the citrus mealybug Planococcus citri (Risso) (Hom. Krishnamoorthy A, Mani M (1989a) Recovery of an
Pseudococcidae). Z Angew Entomol 97(2):162167 exotic parasitoid, Leptomastix dactylopii How. from
Hoyt AS (1912) Natural control of citrus mealybug. Calif Planococcus citri (Risso) infesting some horticultural
State Commun Hortic Mon Bull 1:231234 crops. J Biol Control 3:125
Huang BK, Qiu JH, Jiang F (1983) A study of the citrus Krishnamoorthy A, Mani M (1989b) Coccidoxenoides
root mealybug a new insect on citrus in China peregrina: a new parasitoid of Planococcus citri in
[Chinese]. J Fujian Agric College (Fujian India. Curr Sci 58:466
Nongxueyuan Xuebao) 12(3):183193 Krishnamoorthy A, Mani M (1989c) Record of green lace
Itioka T, Inoue T (1996) The role of predators and atten- wings preying on mealybugs in India. Curr Sci
dant ants in the regulation and persistence of a popula- 58:155156
tion of the citrus mealybug Pseudococcus citriculus in Krishnamoorthy A, Singh SP (1987) Biological control of
a satsuma orange orchard. Appl Entomol Zool citrus rnealybug. Planococcus citri with an introduced
31(2):195202 parasite Leptomastix dactylopii in India. Entomophaga
Jadhav VB, Pujari CV (1999) Field evaluation of some 32:143148
insecticides and plant oils against citrus mealybug Limon de la Oliva F, Blasco Pasaral J (1973) Prelimineries
(Planococcus citri Risso). In: Proceedings of interna- for the study of natural control and measures to use
tional symposium on citriculture held at Nagpur dur- against pests of citrus in the northern part of the
ing November, 2327, pp 902904 Levante regions with a view to the establishment of a
Jadhav VB, Raijadav SB, Pujari CV (1997) Chemical programme of integrated control. Bol Inform Plagas
control of citrus mealybug (Planococcus citri Risso). 199:6986
In: Proceedings of national symposium on citriculture Limon de la Oliva F, Blasco Pascual J, Vicente Lopez S,
held during November 1719 at NRCC, Nagpur, Verniere Fernandez C (1972) Control tests against the
India, pp 362363 citrus mealybug on citrus[Spanish]. Bol Inform Plagas
Kalidas P, Shivankar VJ (1994) Final report of the project 99:5765
Studies on Chemical Control of Insect Pests of Liotta G, Mineo G (1963) Prove dilotto biologica artici-
Nagpur Mandarin with special reference to Citrus ale control lo Pseudococcus citri. Boll Inst Entomol
Blacky, psylla and leaf miner. NRCC, Nagpur, 35 p Agran Oss Vet Fitopat Palermo 5:316
Kawai S, Takagi K (1971) Descriptions of three economi- Liotta G, Mineo G (1965) Tests for articial biological
cally important species of root-feeding mealybugs in control of Planococcus citri (Citrus mealy bug). Boll
Japan (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Appl Entomol Inst Entomol Agrar Oss Fitopat Palermo
Zool 6(4):175182 25:129142
Kerns D, Wright G, Loghry J (2004) Citrus mealybug Lit IL (1997) New records and additional notes on
(Planococcus citri). http://cals.arizona.edu/crops/cit- Philippine mealybugs (Pseudococcidae, Coccoidea,
rus/insects/citrusinsect.html Hemiptera). Philipp Entomol 11:3348
Khalaf J, Aberoomand GH (1989) Some preliminary Lit IL, Calilung VJ (1994) Philippine mealybugs of the
research on the biology and biological control of genus Pseudococcus (Pseudococcidae, Coccoidea,
mealybug in Fars province of Iran. [Persian]. Entomol Hemiptera). Philipp Entomol 9:254267
Phytopathol Appl 56(27):9399 Lo PKC, Tao CC (1966) The natural enemies of
Kondo T, Ramos-Portilla AA, Vergara-Navarro EV (2008) Nipaeoccus lamentosus (Cockereli) in Taiwan.
Updated list of mealybugs and putoids from Colombia J Taiwan Agric Res 15:5356
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae and Putoidae). (In Luck RF, Forster LD (2003) Quality of augmentative bio-
Spanish). Boletin del Museo de Entomologia de la logical control agents: a historical perspective and les-
Universidad del Valle 9(1):2953 sons learned from evaluating Trichogramma. In:
Krambias A, Kontzonis A (1980) Establishment of Quality control and production of biological control
Leptomastix dactylopii (How.) in Cyprus. Fruits agents: theory and testing procedures. CABI Pub,
35:783785 Cambridge, MA, pp 231246
39 Fruit Crops: Citrus 373

Luppino P (1979) Lotta biologica per la difesa deglis gru- Mason FR (1941) Notes on mealybugs and their parasites.
metii si controlla il Planococcus citri utilizando at Annual report of the Department of Agriculture and
Leptomastix dactylopii. Informetere Agriri Fisheries for one year ended March 31, Jerusalem,
35:31833186 pp 415
Mani M (1994) Recovery of the indigenous Mazzone P (1977) Recent distributions of Cryotolaemus
Coccidoxenoides peregrinus and the exotic montrouzieri in Campania. Boll Lab Entomol Agrar F
Leptomastix dactylopii in lemon and acid lime S Portici 34:225227
orchards. Biocontrol Sci Tech 4:4952 McKenzie HL (1967) Mealybugs of California with tax-
Mani M (1995a) Comparative development, progeny pro- onomy, biology, and control of North American spe-
duction and sex ratio of the exotic parasitoid cies (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae).
Leptomastix dactylopii howard (Hym., Encyrtidae) on University of California Press, Berkeley, 526p
Planococcus lilacinus and P. citri (Homop., Mendel Z, Blumberg D, Ishaya I (1991) Effect of
Pseudococcidae). Entomon 20(I):2326 buprofzin on Icerya purchasi and Planococcus citri.
Mani M (1995b) Studies on the natural enemies of orien- Phytoparasitica 19:103112
tal mealybug Planococcus lilacinus (Ckll.) Meyerdirk DE, French JV, Chandler LD, Harts WD
(Homoptera : Pseudoccidae) in India. J Entomol Res (1981) Effect of commercially applied pesticides for
19(1):6170 control of the citrus mealybug. Southwest Entomol
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1995) Inuence of different 6:4952
stages of oriental mealybug, Planococcus lilacinus Michelakis S, Hamid HA (1995) Integrated control meth-
(Ckll.) on the development, progeny production and ods of the citrus mealybug, planococcus citri (risso) in
sex ratio of the parasitoid, Tetracnemoidea indica crete, Greece. Israel J Entomol 29:277284
Ayyar. J Insect Sci 8(2):192193 Miller DR, Williams DJ (1997) A new species of mealy-
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1996) Mealy bug problem bug in the genus Pseudococcus (Homoptera:
on fruit crops. Indian Hortic 41(3):4345 Pseudococcidae) of quarantine importance. Proc
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1999) Maconellicoccus hir- Entomol Soc Wash 99:305311
sutus on acid lime in India. Insect Environ 5:7374 Mineo G (1967) Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. Observations
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (2002) Biological suppres- on morphology and bionomics. Bull Inst Entomol
sion of spherical mealybug Nipaecoccus viridis Agrar Oss Fitopat Palermo 6:99143
(Newstead) (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae) on acid lime Mineo G, Viggiani G (1976) On the acclimatisation in
in India. Entomon 27:423424 Italy of Leptomastix dactylopii, a parasite of the citrus
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (2007) Biological control of mealybug [Italian]. Inf Fitopatol 26(5):1315
Planococcus citri (Risso) on acid lime with Moore SD, Hattingh V (2004) Augmentation of natural
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant in India. Entomon enemies for control of citrus pests in South Africa: a
32:221223 guide for growers. SA Fruit J 3:4547, 51, 53
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (2008) Biological suppres- Muma MH (1954) Lady beetle predators of citrus mealy-
sion of the mealybugs Planococcus citri (Risso), bugs. Citrus Magazine, April, pp 1617
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) and Nipaecoccus viridis Muniappan R, Meyerdirk DE, Sengebau FM, Berringer
(Newstead) on pummelo with Cryptolaemus mon- DD, Reddy GVP (2006) Classical biological control
trouzieri Mulsant in India. J Biol Control 22:169172 of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A, Srinivasa Rao M (1993) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the Republic of
Toxicity of different pesticides to the exotic parasit- Palau. Florida Entomol 89:212217
oid, Leptomastix dactylopii How. Indian J Plant Prot Murray DAH (1978) Effect of fruit y sprays on the abun-
21:9899 dance of the citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri
Manjunath TM (1985) Leptomastix dactylopii in India. (Risso), and its predator, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri
Biocontrol News Inform 6:297 Mulsant, on passion-fruit in south-eastern Queensland.
Marchal P (1921) Utilization des coccinelles contre les Qld J Agric Anim Sci 35(2):143147
insectaries nuisibles aux cultures dans le midi la Nagarkatti S, Singh SP, Jayanth KP, Bhumannavar BS
France. CR Hebdom Acad Sci Paris 172:105107 (1992) Introduction and establishment of Leptomastix
Marchal P, Pussard R (1938) Acclimatation de dactylopii 9Hym., Encyrtidae) against Planococcus
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. C R Acad Agric Fr spp. in India. Indian J Plant Prot 19:102104
34:972976 Narayanan R (1957) A note on the performance of
Marotta S (1987) An annotated list of the Italian mealy- Cryatolaemus montrouzieri Bul. in citrus orchards
bugs. Boll Lab Entomol Agrar F S Portici at Burnihat (Assam). Technical bulletin
43:107116 Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control No.
Marotta S, Harten A, Van Mahyoub MA (2001) Mealybugs 9, pp 137138
found on agricultural crops in Yemen. Boll Zool Agrar Niyazov OD (1969) The parasites and predators of grape
Bachic 33(3):233238 mealybug [Russian]. Zashchita Rastenii
Martinez-Ferrer MT, Garcia-Mari F, Ripolles Moles JL 14(11):3840
(2003) Population dynamics of Planococcus citri Olivero J, Garcia E, Wong E, Marquez AL, Garcia S
(Risso) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in citrus groves (2003) Dening a method to determine the release
in Spain. Bull OILB/SROP 26:149161 dose of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. based on
374 C.N. Rao et al.

the incidence of Planococcus citri Risso in citrus Sharaf NW, Meyerdirk DE (1987) A review on the biol-
orchards. Bull OILB/SROP 26:163168 ogy, ecology and control of Nipaecoccus viridis
Oncuer C, Bayhan N (1982) An investigation into feeding (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Misc Publ Entomol
capacity and list of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. Soc Am 66:118
Turkiye Bitki Koruma Dergesi 6:8590 Shivankar VJ, Shyam Singh (2000) Citrus insect pests.
Ortu D (1982) Observations on Planococcus citri (Risso) NRCC Publication, Nagpur, 252p
in citrus plantations in Sardina. Studi Sassaresi Shrewsbury PM, Bejleri K, Lea Cox JD (2004) Integrating
29:199209 cultural management practices and biological control
Ortu S, Pruta R (1985) Short remarks on the recent intro- to suppress citrus mealybug. Acta Hortic
duction of entomophagus insects to protect Sardinian 633:425434
citrus and grapes. Frutula Entomol (198485) Shylesha AN, Pathak KA (1999) Integrated management
7&8:115123 of major insect pests of Khasi mandarin in Meghalaya.
Ozkan A, Gurol M, Uysal H, Celik G, Akteke SA, Eray N, In: Proceedings of national symposium on citriculture,
Aytekin H, Arslan M, Kaplan M, Dalka Y, Akyel E, held at Nagpur during November 1719, pp 332334
Tuncer H (2001) Integrated pest management in citrus Simmonds FJ (1971) Report on a tour of Asian and Pacic
orchards in Antalya (19951999)[Turkish]. Bitki commonwealth countries. September 1970January
Koruma Bulteni 41:135166 1971. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham
Panis A (1979) Mealybugs (Homoptera, Coccoidea: Royal, Slough, 85 p
Pseudococcidae) within the framework of integrated Singh SP (1978) Propagation of a coccinellid beetle for
control in Mediterranean citrus-growin [French]. Rev the biological control of citrus and coffee mealybugs.
Zool Agric Pathol Veg 78(3):8896 Scientic conference, CPA, December, 2 p
Paoli G (1927) Gasi topatologici deservati in Liguria Singh SP (1990) Biological suppression of pests in fruit
nella primavera estate 1927. Boll Staz Patol Veg crops. In: Proceedings of the Indo-USSR joint work-
Roma 7:382387 shop on problems and potentials of biocontrol of pests
Pathak KA, Rajasekhara Rao K, Mishra M, Gupta SG, and diseases held at Bangalore during June 2628, 294
Yadav DS (1999) Integrated management of citrus p
mealy bug, Planococcus citri (Risso) in micro- Sinha PK, Sayeed MZ, Dinesh DS (1985) A report on the
propagated plantlets in Meghalaya. In: Proceedings of mealyugs (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), their host
international symposium on citriculture, held at plants and natural enemies at Bhagalpur. Proc Nat
Nagpur during November 2327. pp 956960 Acad Sci, India 55(B)(II):1317
Pelakasis CD (1974) Historical review of biological con- Smith HS (1919) On some phases of insect control by bio-
trol of citrus scale insects in Greece. Bull WPRS logical method. J Econ Entomol 12:288292
13:1419 Smith HS (1928) The native home of citrophilus mealy-
Poutiers R (1922) Acclimitation de Cryptolaemus mon- bug. J Econ Entomol 21:435436
trouzieri Muls. Dans le midi de la France. Ann Epiphyt Smith HS, Armitage HM (1931) Biological control of
8:318 mealybugs attacking citrus. Calif Univ Agric Exp
Pussard R (1938) Acclimatisatison Cryptolaemus mon- State Bull 509, 74 p
trouzieri Muls. C R Hebd Seane Acad Agric Fr Staal GB, Nassar S, Martin JW (1973) Control of the
24:974976 citrus mealybug with insect growth regulators with
Raciti E, Tumminelli R, Campo G, Cutuli G (1995) juvenile hormone activity. J Econ Entomol
Strategies of integrated defence in citrus crops 66(4):851853
[Italian]. Informatore Agrar 51:7376 Stephanov EM (1935) The biological method of control-
Ragusa S, Swirski E (1977) Feeding habits, post- ling pests of plants in Abkhazia. Rev Appl Entomol
embryonic and adult survival, mating, virility and 8:80
fecundity of the predacious mite Amblyseius swirskii Subba Rao BR, Sangwar HS, Abbasi OA, Singh Y, Ksheer
(Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on some coccids and mealy- Sagar AM (1965) New records of hymenopterous par-
bugs. Entomophaga 22(4):383392 asites of Nipaecoccus vastator (Maskell) (Homoptera:
Rao KR, Shylesha AN, Pathak AK (2001) Spatial dynam- Coccidae), a serious pest of citrus spp from India.
ics of citrus mealybug Planococcus citri Risso at Indian J Entomol 27:109110
medium high altitudes of Meghalaya. Indian J Hill Suresh S, Chandra Kavitha P (2008) Seasonal incidence of
Farm 14(2):4852 economically important coccid pests in Tamil Nadu. In:
Rosen D (1967) Biological and integrated control of citrus Branco M, Franco JC, Hodgson CJ (eds) Proceedings of
pests in Israel. J Econ Entomol 60:14221427 the XI International Symposium on Scale Insect
Rubtsov IA (1954) Citrus pests and their natural enemies, Studies, Oeiras, Portugal, 2427 September 2007. ISA
Izd. ANSSR, Moscow-Leningrad, 260p (Russian) Press, Lisbon, pp 285291, 322 p
Sharaf NS (1997) Host plants and natural enemies of Tag Elsir EA, Osman EA (2011) Abundance of the citrus
mealybugs and other related Homopterans, with spe- mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso), on some citrus
cial reference to the spherical mealybug Nipaecoccus species, in the Gezira State (Sudan) and the efcacy of
viridis (Newstead), in Jordan. Dirasat Agric Sci the petroleum spray oil D-C TronReg. Plus in its
24(3):383390 control. IOBC/WPRS Bull 62:132
39 Fruit Crops: Citrus 375

Timofeeva TV (1979) A parasite of the maritime mealy- Williams DJ (1989) The mealybug genus Rastrococcus
bug. Zashch Rastenii 6:45 Ferris (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Syst Entomol
Tirumala Rao V, David LA (1958) The biological control 14(4):433486
of a coccid pest in South India by the use of beetle Williams DJ (1996) A brief account of the hibiscus mealy-
Cryptolaemus montoruzieri Muls. Indian J Agric Sci bug Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera:
28:545552 Pseudococcidae), a pest of agriculture and horticul-
Turinetti L (1921) LAcclimation des Insects auxiliaries. ture, with descriptions of two related species from
Rev Hist Nat App Paris, Tere Partie 2:216221 southern Asia. Bull Entomol Res 86:617628
Viggiani G (1970) Pseudococcus fragilis Brain Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of Southern Asia. The
(Homoptera Pseudococcidae) on Citrus in Campania. Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
(Preliminary notes.) [Italian]. Boll Lab Entomol Agrar London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
F S Portici 28:5560 Williams DJ, Butcher CF (1987) Scale insects (Hemiptera:
Villalba M, Vila N, Marzal C, Garcia Mari F (2006) Coccoidea) of Vanuatu. N Z Entomol 9:8899
Inuence of inoculative releases of natural enemies Williams DJ, Granara de Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs
and exclusion of ants in the biological control of the of Central and South America. CAB International,
citrus mealybug Planococcus citri (Hemiptera: London, 635 p
Pseudococcidae), in citrus orchards [Spanish]. Boll Williams DJ, Watson GW (1988) The scale insects of the
Sanidad Veg, Plagas 32:203213 tropical South Pacic region. Pt. 2: the mealybugs
Walker A, Hoy M, Meyerdirk DE (2003) Papaya (Pseudococcidae). CAB International Institute of
Mealybug. Univ. Florida Featured Crea-tures. http:// Entomology, London, 260 p
creatures.ifas.u.edu/fruit/mealybugs/papa Wilson F (1960) A review of biological control of insects
Watson JR (1932) Report of the department of Entomology and weeds in Australian and Australian New Guinea.
Fla Agr Expt Sta Ann Rot 193031, pp 7080 Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control
Wille JE (1936) The biological control of some pests in Technical Communication, no. 1, 102 p
Peru. Boll Dir Agric Peru 6:2223 Wysoki M, Izhar Y, Swirski E, Gurevitz E, Greenberg S
Williams DJ (1985) Australian mealybugs. British (1977) Susceptibility of avocado varieties to the long-
Museum (Natural History), London, 431p tailed mealybug, Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni
Williams DJ (1986a) The identity and distribution of the Tozzetti) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), and a survey
genus Maconellicoccus Ezzat (Hemiptera: of its host plants in Israel. Phytoparasitica
Pseudococcidae) in Africa. Bull Entomol Res 5(3):140148
76:351357 Yigit A, Canhilal R (1998) Introduction into East
Williams DJ (1986b) Rastrococcus invadens sp. n. Mediterranean region of cold-tolerant ecotypes of the
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) introduced from the citrus mealybugs predator [Cryptolaemus montrouz-
Oriental Region to West Africa and causing damage to ieri Muls. (Col.:Coccinellidae)], some biological
mango, citrus and other trees. Bull Entomol Res properties and their adaptation to the region [Turkish].
76:695699 Bitki Koruma Bulteni 38:2341
Fruit Crops: Guava
40
M. Mani

40.1 Species foliage and fruit also become covered with large
quantities of sticky honeydew which serves as a
Mealybugs are reported to be injurious to guava medium for the growth of black sooty moulds.
in India, Bangladesh, Taiwan, South Africa, The sooty moulds and waxy deposits result in the
Egypt, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Hawaii etc (Table reduction of photosynthetic area. Ornamental
40.1). plants and produce lose their market value.

40.2 Damage 40.3 Seasonal Development

Nymphs and adults suck the sap from leaves, stem In Taichung, Taiwan, populations of both nymphs
and fruits. In addition, the sticky honeydew and adults of Planococcus citri on guava were
excreted by the mealybugs serves as a substrate large in the cool dry months from November to
for the growth of sooty mould interfering photo- April and small in the warm wet months from
synthesis. Severe mealybug infestation causes July to September. Nymphal populations had 4 or
heavy economic losses (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 5 marked peaks between November and April,
1993). In the case of Maconellicoccus hirsutus, considered ideal times for insecticide applica-
the mealybug injects toxic saliva into the plant tions. There was a negative relationship between
while feeding which results in malformation of mealybug populations and temperature. Incessant
leaf and shoot growth, stunting, and occasional rainfall and heavy pruning of trees also had
death. Leaves show a characteristic curling, while adverse effects on populations (Liu and Chang
heavily infested plants have shortened internodes 1984). In India, the mealybugs are found through-
leading to rosetting or a bunchy top appearance out the year on guava plants but the population
(Mani and Krishnamoorthy 2001). Infestations of was found in greater numbers in summer months
Ferrisia virgata remain clustered around the ter- (February-June).
minal shoots, leaves and fruit, sucking the sap
which results in yellowing, withering and drying
of plants and shedding of leaves and fruit. The 40.4 Management

M. Mani (*) Most of the insecticides do not provide adequate


Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, control of the guava mealybugs due to their con-
Bangalore 560089, India cealed habitat and waxy coating over the body.
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 377


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_40
378 M. Mani

Table 40.1 List of mealybugs recorded on guava in different countries


Mealybug species Country/region Reference
Chlorozococcus alami India Khalid and Shafee (1998)
Khalid & Shafee
Crisicoccus hirsutus India Williams (2004)
(Newstead)
Deltococcus aberiae Kenya, South Africa Ben-Dov (1994)
(Delotto)
Dysmicoccus bispinosus Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
Beardsley
Dysmicoccus brevipes Indonesia Williams (2004)
(Cockerell) Bangladesh Ullah et al. (1993)
Dysmicoccus bispinosus Spain Angeles Martinez et al. (2006)
(Beardsley)
Dysmicoccus India Williams (2004)
debregeasiae (Green)
Dysmicoccus lepelleyi Indonesia, Williams (2004)
(Betrem) Philippines, Vietnam
Exallomochlus camur Philippines Williams (2004)
sp.n.
Exallomochlus hispidus Malaysia Williams (2004)
(Morrison)
Ferrisia neovirgata Khalid India Williams (2004)
& Shafee
Ferrisia virgata (Ckll) India Mani and Krishnamoorthy (1993)
Bangladesh Boucek and Bhuiya (1990)
Italian Somaliland Chairomonte (1933)
South Africa Villiers and de Stander (1978)
Yemen Marotta et al. (2001)
Pakistan Williams (2004)
Ferrisicoccus psidii India Mukhopadhyay (2005)
Mukhopadhyay & Ghose
Maconellicoccus hirsutus India Baskaran et al. (2007), Jalaluddin and Sadakathulla (1998)
(Green) Egypt Hall (1926)
George Town, Grand
Cayman.
Italian Somaliland Chairomonte (1933)
Philippines, Malaysia Williams (2004)
Nipaecoccus nipae Hawaii Ben-Dov (1994)
(Maskell)
Nipaecoccus viridis India Hayat (1981), Williams (2004)
(Newstead)
Paracoccus marginatus India Tanwar and Jeyakumar (2010)
Williams and Granara de Sri Lanka Galanihe et al.(2010)
Willink
Australia www.planthealthaustralia.com.au
Paracoccus interceptus Philippines Williams (2004)
Lit.
Phenacoccus Mexico Ben-Dov (1994)
pseudopumilis Hadzibejli
Phenacoccus sp. Bangladesh Boucek and Bhuiya (1990)
(continued)
40 Fruit Crops: Guava 379

Table 40.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Country/region Reference
Phenacoccus parvus Ethiopian, Ben-Dov (1994)
Morrison neotropical & Pacic
region
Phenacoccus peruvianus Los Angeles County http://ucanr.edu/blogs/pestnews/index.
Granara de Willink cfm?tagname=Bougainvillea% 20mealybug
Planococcus citri (Risso) India Mani and Krishnamoorthy (1989)
Bangladesh Ullah and Parveen (1993)
Taiwan Liu and Chang (1984)
South Africa Joubert (1964)
Egypt El-Sebae and El-akkari (1977)
UK Tingle and Copland (1988)
Planococcus lilacinus India Mani (1995a)
Ckll.
Malaysia Williams (2004)
Planococcus minor Bangladesh Boucek and Bhuiya (1990)
(Maskell) = Planococcus Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Williams (2004)
pacicus Cox Vietnam, Thailand
Planococcus psidii Cox Malaysia Williams (2004)
Planococcus psidii sp. UK Cox (1989)
nov.
Pseudococcus baleiteus Thailand Williams (2004)
Lit.
Pseudococcus cryptus Bangladesh, Bhutan, Williams (2004)
Hempel Indonesia, Malaysia,
Sri Lanka, Vietnam
Pseudococcus Thailand, Sudan, Williams (2004), Ben-Dov (1994)
jackbeardsley Gimpel and Kenya
MilleR
Pseudococcus sp. Pakistan Muhammad Sarwar (2006)
Pseudococcus longispinus Ben-Dov (1994)
(Targioni Tozzetti)
Rastrococcus sp. Bangladesh Boucek and Bhuiya (1990)
Rastrococcus monachus Malaysia Williams (1989)
sp. nov.
Rastrococcus iceryoides India Mani and Krishnamoorthy (1998)
Green
Rastrococcus invadens Nigeria Ivbijaro et al. (1992)
Williams Bangladesh, India, Williams (2004)
Philippines
Rasrococcus monachus Malaysia Williams (2004)
Williams
Rasrococcus spinosus Cambodia, Malaysia, Williams (2004)
(Robinson) Philippines
Rastrococcus vicorum Malaysia Williams (2004)
Williams & Watson
380 M. Mani

Application of insecticides also eliminates the the parasitoids and predators are able to suppress
important naturally occurring bioagents resulting the mealybugs on guava (Mani and
in the outbreak of mealybugs. On the other hand, Krishnamoorthy 1990a, 2007; Manjunath 1986).

Leaf damage P. lilacinus on guava Pa. marginatus on Guava Fruit damage

40.4.1 Maconellicoccus hirsutus the reduction in the population of M. hirsutus


was 44.1 (180.0/infested shoot) and 68.4
Atso, an inorganic oil emulsion spray at 3 %, (120.8/infested shoot) percent for the same
gave good control of M. hirsutus on guava in period in Periyakulam, Tamil Nadu, India
India (Jalaluddin and Sadakathulla 1998). C. (Baskaran et al. 2007 ).
montrouzieri undoubtedly reduced the infes-
tation of M. hirsutus on certain trees includ-
ing guava in Egypt (Hall 1926 ). Due to release 40.4.2 Planococcus citri
of C. montrouzieri against M. hirsutus, on
guava at 20/plant, there was a reduction in the It is a polyphagus pest causing severe damage
mealybug population from 918.50/plant to to guava at times. In nature, C. montrouzieri
4.60/plant within a month of release of the appeared along with other natural enemies in
predator (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 2001). the mealybug infested orchards and brought
Releases of S. coccivora at 15 grubs per down the mealybug population in India
infested shoot took 42 and 56 days from the (Manjunath 1986; Mani and Krishnamoorthy
release to bring down the population of M. 1990a, b). In some guava orchards, P. citri was
hirsutus by 38.2 (158.2/infested shoot) and found suppressed by S. epeus, C. lacciperda
68.6 (80.6/infested shoot) percent, respec- and C. montrouzieri in nature (Mani and
tively, while at 15 adults per infested shoot, Krishnamoorthy 1990a).

Natural enemies of guava mealybugs

Cryptolaemus clearing the Aenasius advena Scymnus coccivora


mealybugs
40 Fruit Crops: Guava 381

Releases of the exotic parasitoid Leptomastix May to 1.42 in September, 1990. The mealybug
dactylopii were found to be highly effective population was negligible after September, 1990
against P. citri in guava orchards (Mani 1994). In to December, 1991 (Mani 1994).
a guava orchard in Bangalore North, initial sam- In another guava orchard also in Bangalore
ples collected on June 14, 1990 revealed the pres- North, a mean mealybug population of 1954
ence of exotic parasitoid L. dactylopii but at a was observed in February 1991. A total of
very low level. At the same time, the mean mealy- 2,000 L dactylopii was released in February,
bug population was 1,084. This was due to indis- 1991. The parasitoid was recovered only after
criminate application of insecticides like methyl the releases made in March. The samples col-
parathion, monocrotophos and BHC against P. lected between 23rd March and 10th May, 1991
citri. However, after the suspension of insecti- yielded a large number of adult L dactylopii
cidal sprays, the population of L. dactylopii (Table). However, the local natural enemies like
started increasing. It was found in large numbers C. Natural enemy complex of P. citri consisted
between 23rd July and 4th August, 1990. Natural of the encyrtid parasitoid, Coccidoxenoides per-
enemy complex of P. citri consisted of the encyr- minutus (Timberlake), the gregarious platygas-
tid parasitoid, Coccidoxenoides perminutus terid Allotropa sp. besides L. dactylopii. In
(Timberlake) and the gregarious platygasterid general, C. perminutus was observed in small
Allotropa sp. besides L. dactylopii. C. perminutus numbers in the present study. But, Allotropa sp.
was observed in small numbers, but, Allotropa emerged in large numbers in the late samples
sp. emerged in large numbers in the late samples collected in August-September, Chrysopa sp.
collected in August-September. Indigenous pred- and C. montrouzieri Muls. remained at a very
ators like the lycaenid Spalgis epeus Westwood low level throughout the study. P. citri once
and Chrysopa sp. were noticed in very low num- found in very high numbers in February, 1991
bers. Due to build-up of the population of the almost completely disappeared by the end of
parasitoids especially L. dactylopii, the popula- May 1991, and the mealybug was kept under
tion of P. citri gradually declined from 1,084 in check up to December, 1991 (Mani 1994).

Allotropa sp. Coccidoxenoides perminutus

Neem oil and pongamia oil (both at 4 %) are 10 days after the rst) (Hussain and Puttaswamy
recommended for the control of P. citri on guava; 1996).
they caused 93.23 and 89.39 % mortality of the At Taichung, Taiwan, insecticide treatments
pest, resp., 10 days after the second spray (applied were generally more effective against nymphs
382 M. Mani

than adults. Spray applications made two or three guava orchards (Krishnamoorthy and Mani
times at intervals of 710 days prior to popula- 1988). A single larva of M. boninensis was able
tion build-up gave the best control. Application to prey about 345, 490 and 560 nymphs of F. vir-
of omethoate, methidathion, formothion and gata, P. lilacinus and P. citri respectively (Mani
dimethoate at various rates gave effective control and Krishnamoorthy 1990b). Blepyrus insularis
of P. citri. However, treatment with mixtures of bred very well on 510 old nymphs of F. virgata
malathion with methidathion or formothion, each (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 1991). The key para-
applied at half the rate when used alone, gave sitoid A. advena could be conserved by the appli-
effective and economic control, without being cations of diazinon, phosalone and dichlorvos
phytotoxic (Liu and Chang 1984). (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 1992).
Introduction of parasitoids gave improved Cryptolaemus montrouzieri was released
biological control of P. citri in a large glasshouse against F. virgata on guavas in the guava orchards
stocked with guava plants in the UK, supple- in India in 1987. C. montrouzieri along with the
menting that achieved by the coccinellid predator local natural enemies Aenasius advena Compere
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. Following parasit- and Scymnus coccivora Ayyar effectively con-
oid release, there was evidence of pest population trolled the mealybugs within 50 days of release.
regulation on guava with reduced and stabilized The control of the striped mealybug was rated as
mealybug numbers and stable percentage parasit- outstanding (Mani et al. 1990). F. virgata
ism. The mean temperature during one sampling appeared in severe form on guava in the poly-
period was signicantly correlated with percent- house in 2006 in Bangalore North. A mean of
age parasitism 2 months later, indicating that 146.38 mealybugs/plant was observed on 5th
temperature has a major impact on parasitism March 2006 which declined to 0.96/plant on 7th
efciency. The encyrtid Leptomastidea abnormis May 2006 following the release of C. montrouz-
was responsible for about 90 % of the parasitism ieri. Cryptolaemus montrouzieri was the only
observed; the remainder was by another encyrtid, natural enemy recorded on F. virgata during the
Leptomastix dactylopii (Tingle and Copland study period. No other natural enemy was
1988). recorded on F. virgata infesting the potted guava
plants in the polyhouse (Mani 2008).
According to Zimmerman (1948), F. virgata
40.4.3 Ferrisia virgata was rst recorded in the Hawaiian Islands in
1898 but was a widespread and common pest in
Prothiophos, either alone or with mineral oil the Islands long before this. It is no longer com-
(0.5 %), gave better control of F. virgata than did mon in the Hawaiian Islands as it has been con-
malathion (the standard insecticide), the differ- trolled by the coccinellids Cryptolaemus
ence being evident from 8 days after application. montrouzieri, Olla v-nigrum and Azya luteipes,
Harvest residues were negligible. Mineral oil together with the syrphid, Alloagrapta obliqua.
(1 %) alone was also more effective than mala- At the beginning of a local outbreak, severely
thion but it caused leaf scorch followed by defo- infested branches should be cut and burnt imme-
liation. An ant barrier was ineffective (Villiers diately (Schmutterer 1969).
and de Stander 1978).
Aenasius advena Comp. and Blepyrus insu-
laris (Cam.), S. coccivora, Mallada boninensis 40.4.4 Planococcus lilacinus
(Okamoto), Brumus suturalis (F.) and Spalgis
epeus (Westwood), C. sexmaculata were Cryptolaemus montrouzieri supplements the
recorded on F. virgata (Mani et al. 1990). local natural enemies Brumoides suturalis
Chrysopa lacciperda (Kimmis) and Chrysoperla (Fabricius), Scymnus coccivora, Spalgis epeus
carnea were observed on F. virgata and P. citri in Westwood in clearing the population of P. lilaci-
40 Fruit Crops: Guava 383

nus in guava orchards (Mani 1995). P. lilacinus 40.5 Mixed Mealybug


was rst observed in January, 1990, on guava. Populations
Malathion (5 %) dust was applied around the
trees and ant holes to check the activity of ants. C. montrouzieri is recommended to control the
The mealybug population remained very high mixed mealybug population on guava.
from January to July. About 200 adult beetles
were released on guava variety selection 113
infested with P. lilacinus since only about ten References
trees Predators per ten shoots were affected. Both
the predators, viz., S. epeus and C. montrouzieri Angeles Martinez M, De Los Suris M, Blanco E (2006)
Mealybug (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) fauna associated to
were also found throughout the study. However,
plants of interest: II. Fruit trees. [Spanish] Fauna de
S. epeus appeared in considerable number from chinches harinosas (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) asociada a
June onwards and cleared mealybugs. The plantas de interes: II. Arboles Frutales 21(2):109113
mealybug population declined rapidly, and by the Baskaran RKM, Mahendhiran G, Suresh K (2007) Field
evaluation of Scymnus coccivora Ayyar for the man-
end of September several infested fruits were
agement of guava mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsu-
cleared from mealybugs by S. epeus (Table). At tus Green. J Entomol Res 31(2):137140
the same time, P. lilacinus was found in abun- Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
dance in Block No. 9 where the natural enemies bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
were absent due to hectic activity of black ant,
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
Camponotis compressus (F.). importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
Boucek Z, Bhuiya BA (1990) A new genus and species of
Pteromalidae (Hym.) attacking mealybugs and soft
scales (Hom. Coccoidea) on guava in Bangladesh.
40.4.5 Nipaecoccus viridis Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 126: 15161519,
231235
Alamella ava Agar was found parasitizing N. Chairomonte A (1933) Entomologist notes on fruit tree
viridis infesting guava plants in India (Hayat growing in Italian Somaliland. Agric Colon
27:383385
1981).
Cox JM (1989) The mealybug genus Planococcus
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Bull Br Museum
(Natural History), Entomol 58(1):178. 61
40.4.6 Rastrococcus iceryoides El-Sebae AH, El, El-akkari MM (1977) Studies on the
chemical structure and insecticidal activity
(Green) II. Efciency of locally formulated spray mineral oils.
Alexandria I. Agric Res 19:131138
The encyrtid Praleurocerus viridis (Agarwal) Galanihe LD, Jayasundera MUP, Vithana A,
and S. coccivora were found very effective in Asselaarachchi N, Watson GW (2010) Occurrence,
distribution and control of papaya mealybug,
reducing the population of R. iceryoides in Tamil
Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae),
Nadu (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 1998). an invasive alien pest in Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res Ext
13(3):8186
Hall WJ (1926) The hibiscus mealybug, Phenacoccus hir-
sutus (Green) in Egypt in 1925 with notes on introduc-
tion of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. Minist Agric
Egypt Bull 70:115
Hayat M (1981) Taxonomic notes on Indian Encyrtidae
(Hymenoptera; Chalcidoidea). Colemania 1:1334
Hussain MA, Puttaswamy VCA (1996) Management of
citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri Risso on guava
using botanical oils. Insect Environ 2(3):7374
Ivbijaro MF, Udensis N, Ukwela UM, Anno-Nyako FV
(1992) Geographical distribution and host range in
Nigeria of the mango mealy bug, Rastrococcus
Praleurocerus viridis
384 M. Mani

invadens Williams, a serious exotic pest of horticulture Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (2001) Suppression of
and other crops. Insect Sci Appl 13(3):411416 Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) on guava. Insect
Jalaluddin SM, Sadakathulla S (1998) Effect of Atso oil Environ 6(4):152
emulsion sprays in the control of mealy bug Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (2007) Recent trends in the
Maconellicoccus hirsutus infesting guava fruits. biological suppression of guava pests in India. Acta
Entomon 23(2):151152 Hortic 735:469481
Joubert CJ (1964) Mealybugs on vines. Bull Dept agric Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A, Singh SP (1990) The impact
South Africa 243: 20 p of the predator, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant,
Khalid M, Shafee AS (1998) Five new species of on pesticide-resistant populations of the striped mealy-
Pseudococcidae (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from North bug, (Ckll.) on guava in India. Insect Sci Appl
East India. Indian J Syst Entomol 5:6573 11(2):167170
Krishnamoorthy A, Mani M (1988) Records of green Manjunath TM (1986) Recent outbreaks of mealybugs
lacewings preying on mealybugs in India. Curr Sci and their biological control in Resurgence of sucking
58:155156 pests. In: S Jayaraj (ed) Proceedings of National sym-
Liu TS, Chang DC (1984) Population uctuations and the posium. TNAU, Coimbatore, pp 249253
control of citrus mealy bug on guava plants [Chinese]. Marotta S, Harten A, Van Mahyoub MA (2001) Mealybugs
Chinese J Entomol 4(1):8795 found on agricultural crops in Yemen. Bollettino di
Mani M (1994) Effectiveness of the exotic parasitoid Zoologia Agraria e di Bachicoltura 33(3):233238
Leptomastix dactylopii in the control of Planococcus Mukhopadhyay AK (2005) Study on the biology of the
citri in guava orchards. J Entomol Res 18:351355 mealybug, Ferrisicoccus psidii. Ann Plant Protect Sci
Mani M (1995) Studies on the natural enemies of orien- 13(1):239240
tal mealybug, Planococcus lilacinus (Ckll.) Sarwar M (2006) Occurrence of insect pests on guava
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in India. J Entomol (Psidium guajava) tree. Pakistan J Zool
Res 19(1):6170 38(3):197200
Mani M (2008) Polyhouse efcacy of Cryptolaemus mon- Tanwar RK, Jeyakumar VS (2010) Papaya mealybug and
trouzieri Mulsant for the suppression of Planococcus its management strategies. NCIPM Techn Bull 22, 26 p
citri (Risso) on grapes and Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) Tingle CCD, Copland MJW (1988) Effects of temperature
on guava. J Insect Sci 21:202204 and host-plant on regulation of glasshouse mealybug
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1989) Record of Blepyrus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) populations by intro-
insularis (Cam.) on Ferrisia virgata (Ckll.) in India. duced parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Bull
Curr Sci 58:644 Entomol Res 78(1):135142
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1990a) Natural suppression Ullah GMR, Parveen A (1993) Coccoid pests (scale
of mealybugs in guava orchards. Entomon insects and mealybugs) and their host-plants on
15(34):245247 Chittagong University campus - a checklist.
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1990b) Predation of Mallada Bangladesh J Zool 21(1):181182
boninensis on Ferrisia virgata, Planococcus citri and P Ullah GMR, Alam MS, Das HR (1993) Some aspects of
lilacinus. J Biol Control 4:122123 biology of pineapple mealybug, Dysmicoccus brevipes
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1991) Breeding of Blepyrus (Cockerell) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Chittagong
insularis (Hym., Encyrtidae) on Ferrisia virgate University Studies, Science 17(1): 7781
(Hemip., Pseudococcidae). Entomon 16:275277 Villiers EA, De Stander GN (1978) Control of the striped
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1992) Contact toxicity of mealybug Ferrisia virgata on guavas [Afrikaans].
different pesticides to the encyrtid parasitoids Aenasius Citrus Subtrop Fruit J 541:1617
advena and Blepyrus insularis of the striped mealybug Williams DJ (1989) The mealybug genus Rastrococcus
Ferrisia virgata. Trop. Pest Manag 38:386390 Ferris (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Syst Entomol
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1993) Bionomics and man- 14(4):433486
agement of the striped mealybug, Ferrisia virgata Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
(Ckll.) a world review. Agric Rev 14:2243 Natural History Museum, London, UK and Southdene
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1998) Regulation of SDN. BHD, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 896 p
Rastrococcus iceryoides (Green) on guava. Insect Zimmerman EC (1948) Homoptera: Sternorrhyncha.
Environ 4:71 Insects Hawaii 5:1464
Fruit Crops: Mango
41
M. Mani

41.1 Species Pakistan etc (Table 41.1). So-called mango


mealybugs in India belonging to family marga-
Mealybugs are reported to be injurious to mango rodidae are discussed under chapter mealybugs
India, West Africa, Central America, Ghana, alike in Section 1.
Florida, India, Indonesia, Hawaii, Sri Lanka,

R. iceyroides R. mangiferae R. invadens

41.2 Damage (Mani et al. 1995; Pramanik and Ghose 1991). In


the northern part of Malawi, on the border with
41.2.1 R. iceyroides Tanzania, infestation of mangoes by R. iceyroi-
des was reported to cause severe damage to
It is serious pest of mango in India and Africa. mango trees. Later the infestation by the mealy-
Mealybugs are known to cause serious damage to bug extended up to 18 km into Malawi from the
the mango leaves, owers and fruits. Fruits cov- Songwe River border (Luhanga and Gwinner
ered with mealybugs are unt for marketing 1993).

M. Mani (*)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 385


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_41
386 M. Mani

R. iceryoides on mango fruit Ra. rubellus on fruit

Table 41.1 List of mealybugs recorded on mango in different countries


Species Region/country Reference
Crisicoccus hirsutus (Newstead) India Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus bispinosus Beardsley Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockrell) Bangladesh Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus grassii (Leonardi) Neotropical Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Beardsley Philippines Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus nesophilus Williams & Watson Austroriental and Pacic Ben-Dov (1994)
region
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) India Godse and Bhole (2003)
Pakistan Williams (2004)
Benin Germain et al. (2010)
Formicoccus mangoferacola sp.n India Williams (2004)
Formicoccus corbetti Takahashi Malaysia Williams (2004)
Formicoccus (Planococcoides) robustus Bangladesh, India Williams (2004)
Ezzat & McConnell comb
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) Yemen Marotta et al. (2001)
Egypt Bodkin (1931)
India
Mexico Rosas-Garcia and Parra-
Bracamonte (2011)
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) India Anonymous (1987)
Pakistan Williams (2004)
Nipaecoccus nipae (Makell) Ben-Dov (1994)
Paracoccus interceptus Lit. Benin Germain et al.(2010)
Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Ghana Cham et al. (2011)
Granara de Willin Florida Walker et al. (2003)
Palau Muniappan et al. (2008)
India Jacob Mathew (2011); Shylesha
et al. (2011)
Indonesia Muniappan et al. (2008)
Hawaii Ronald et al. (2007)
Sri Lanka Galanihe et al. (2010)
Australia www.planthealthaustralia.com.au
Paraputo corbetti (Takahashi) Malaysia, Indonesia Williams (2004)
Paraputo leveri (Green) Thailand Williams (2004)
(continued)
41 Fruit Crops: Mango 387

Table 41.1 (continued)


Species Region/country Reference
Paraputo mangiferae (Betrem) comb n. Indonesia Williams (2004)
Paraputo latebrae sp.n Malaysia Williams (2004)
Phenacoccus madeirensis Green Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus parvus Morrison Queensland Swarbrick and Donaldson (1991)
Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley Benin Germain et al. (2010)
Planococcoides robustus Ezzat & India Puttarudriah and Eswaramurthy
McConnell (1976); Godse and Bhole (2003)
Planococcus citri (Risso) India Godse and Bhole (2003)
Florida Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus cus (Signoret) Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus lilacinus (Cockrell) Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel Philippines, Thailand, Williams (2004)
Nepal
Pseudococcus elisae Borkhsenius Central America, Hawaii Beardsley (1986)
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Ben-Dov (1994)
Tozzetti)
Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) Philippines Williams (2004)
Rastrococcus invadens Williams India Narasimham and Chacko (1988);
Godse and Bhole (2003)
Togo in Africa Agricola et al. (1990)
Malaysia, Philippines Williams (2004)
West Africa Vogele et al. (1991)
Nigeria Ivbijaro et al. (1992)
Malawi Luhanga and Gwinner (1993)
Benin, Gabon, Ghana, Neuenschwander et al. (1994)
Nigeria, Sierra Leone and
Zaire
Rastrococcus iceryoides (Green) India Ghose (1961); Ali (1970);
Varshney (1985); Tandon and Lal
(1978); Rawat and Jackmola
(1970); Narasimham and Chacko
(1988); Mani et al. (1995)
Malawi Luhanga and Gwinner (1993)
Bangladesh, Malaysia, Williams (2004)
Nepal
Rastrococcus mangiferae Green India Ali (1970); Varshney(1985);
Narasimham and Chacko (1988)
Malaysia, Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
Rastrococcus spinosus (Rob.) Pakistan Ausaf and Ahmed (1973)
Indonesia, Philippines, Williams (2004)
Thailand, Malaysia,
Bangladesh, Brunei,
Cambodia
Rasrococcus rubellus Williams Malaysia Williams (2004)
Sri Lanka Galanihe and Watson (2012)
388 M. Mani

41.2.2 Planococcoides robustus (Pitan et al. 2002). After its appearance at the
eastern border of Cote dIvoire in 1989, the
It was found infesting the roots of mango in the mango mealybug, R. invadens rapidly became a
Kolar district of Karnataka, India. The mealy- nationwide constraint in mango production. On
bugs were enclosed in a parchment-like covering farmlands, 100 % yield losses could be reached
produced by a symbiotic fungus, but in May the so that infested orchards or trees were destroyed
surface of fruits that touched the soil was covered by farmers (Hala et al. 2004). The mango mealy-
with mealybug in various stages in the life- bug species are serious pests on mangoes in
history. Ants were seen to carry nymphs, which South Africa and result in considerable nancial
were active in the soil at this time (Puttarudriah losses due to the downgrading of mango fruits
and Eswaramurthy 1976). (Lagadec et al. 2009).

41.2.3 Rastrococcus invadens 41.2.4 Maconellicoccus hirsutus

It was accidentally introduced into the West In Mexico, M. hirsutus was observed on Tommy
African region in the early 1980s, has become a Atkins, Haden, Manila, Ataulfo, Keitt, and Kent
serious pest of mangoes in several African coun- cultivars. Presence of insects was observed on
tries (Vogele et al. 1991). The spread of R. terminal buds and fruits in trees, as well as sur-
invadens in Nigeria was limited to Lagos, Ogun rounding weeds (Rosas-Garcia and Parra-
and Oyo States of the humid south-west contigu- Bracamonte 2011).
ous with the Republic of Benin. The frequency
with which infested plants were being felled,
burnt or sprayed with synthetic chemicals sug- 41.3 Natural Enemies
gested that the presence of R. invadens caused a
degree of panic by growers (Ivbijaro et al. 1992). 41.3.1 Rastrococcus iceryoides
On mangoes in the eld in Togo, all instars of R.
invadens were seen to stretch out the abdomen Several natural enemies were recorded on R.
from the leaf surface at a right angle if the leaves iceryoides in Northern India. Anagyrus pseudo-
were exposed to bright sunlight. In the labora- cocci Girault, Gyranusoidea sp., Praleurocerus
tory, the degree of lifting was found to be related viridis Agarwal, Allotropa sp., Microterys avus
to temperature. The reaction started at about 34 (Howard), Dinocarsis sp., Metastenus concinnus
C and reached a maximum at 37 C. Temperatures Walker, Cybocephalus sp., Scymnus coccoivora
measured in the eld on leaves exposed to bright Ayyar, Monomorium oricola (Jerdon),
sunlight were 34.541.1 C, indicating that the Coccophagus sp. and Proctolaelaps sp. were
reaction of the mealybug to high temperature can recorded from Malihabad in UP. But A. pseudo-
be interpreted as a heat-regulating mechanism cocci was found to be an important parasitoid of
(Agricola 1993). In Benin cv. Quinte WAS R. iceryoides (Tandon and Lal 1978; Rawat and
heavily infested with R. invadens and the cv. Jackmola 1970; Shafee et al. 1975; Sinha et al.
Gouverneur was slightly infested. The pre- 1985). Up to 42 % parasitism was observed in
reproductive period of R. invadens on the heavily nature in UP (Tandon and Lal 1978). According
infested tree was shorter and total offspring pro- to Narasimham and Chacko (1988), parasitoids:
duction greater than on the uninfested tree. Plant Anagyrus sp. nr. dactylopii (How.), Anagyrus sp.
genotype had the importance on R. invadens size nr inopus Noyes and Hayat., Coccophagus sex-
and survival (Boavida and Neuenschwander vittatus Hayat, Coccophagus sp. (pseudococci
1995). Protein, fat, carbohydrate, ash, crude bre group), Praleuricerus viridis (Garwal), Allotropa
and moisture contents were depleted with sp., predators: Nephus sp., Leucopis sp.,
increase in mealybug population on mango plants Cacoxenus perspicax (Knab.), Spalgis epeus
41 Fruit Crops: Mango 389

Westwood, Scymnus coccivora Ayyar, 41.4.2 Rastrococcus iceryoides


Coccidodplosis sp., Didiplosis sp. and predatory
ants: Camponotus sp., Myrmicaria brunnea Rastrococcus iceryoides on mango was mostly
Saunders and Oecophylla smaragdina (F.) were kept under check in India by the predators chiey
known to attack R. iceryoides. Mani et al. (1995) C. montrouzieri in India (Manjunath 1986). Field
reported that the parasitoid Anagyrus pseudo- releases of C. montrouzieri were found very
cocci (Gir.) and the predator Cacoxenus perspi- effective in controlling R. iceryoides. The per-
cax (Knab.) were important natural enemies on centage of mealybug infested fruits was more
R. iceryoides in mango ecosystem. An individual than 70 % on varieties like Gola and Kallapady
C. montrouzieri was known to consume about prior to the release of the predator. Field releases
350 mealybug eggs or 500 nymphs during its lar- of C. montrouzieri were made in JuneJuly
val development. In West Bengal, Chartocerus 19921993. Following the release of C. mon-
walkeri, Aprostocetus sp., Promuscidea unfasci- trouzieri, there was signicant reduction in the
ativentris, Anagyrus pseudococci and Anagyrus percentage of infested fruits on all 15 varieties. In
mirzai were recorded on R. iceryoides (Das and May 93, the mango varies like Langra, Totapuri,
Sahoo 2005). Jehangir, Gola, Black Andrews, Maharajaja,
Pasanth and Janardhan Pasand were free from the
mealybug infestation (Mani et al. 1995). In the
41.3.2 Rastrococcus mangiferae eld, adult females were effectively controlled
by three species of chalcidoid parasitoids,
In India, Anagyrus sp., C. montrouzieri and nymphs by the predatory coccinellid Scymnus sp.
Spalgis epeus Westwood were recorded on R. and the contents of ovisacs by a predatory ceci-
mangiferae (Narasimham and Chacko 1988). domyiid in India (Pramanik and Ghose 1991).

41.3.3 Rastrococcus invadens 41.4.3 Rastrococcus invadens

Coccophagus sp., Anagyrus sp., Gyronusodea Both physical and chemical control procedures
tebygi Noyes, C. montrouzieri, Spalgis epeus practiced by farmers have been ineffective
Westwood, Psectra inigua Hagen were recorded against R. invadens. It was observed that the
on R. invadens in India. Anagyrus sp. and G. mealybug is closely related to a complex of natu-
tebygi are worth trying parasitoids for trials ral enemies as parasitoids Gyranusoidea tebigi
against R. invadens in Africa (Narasimham and and Anagyrus mangicola in African counties
Chacko 1988). In West Bengal, Chartocerus sp., (Hala et al. 2004).
Azotus sp. [Ablerus sp.] and G. tebygi were The parasitoid Gyranusoidea tebygi native of
recorded on R. invadens (Das and Sahoo 2005). India was introduced into Togo in Africa in
November 1987 and released as a biological con-
trol agent against the mealybug on mangoes.
41.4 Management Establishment, spread and effectiveness of the
encyrtid were very good, resulting in satisfactory
41.4.1 Planococcoides robustus control (Agricola et al. 1990). In Togo and Benin,
both G. tebygi and Anagyrus mangicola were
Disulfoton as granule was applied to the soil capable of eliminating the mealybug (Moore and
monthly for a year, the plants were watered Cross 1992). The model predicted that the addi-
weekly, and the affected plants which had suf- tion of Anagyrus sp. to a system already contain-
fered desiccation and leaf-fall, showed signs of ing G. tebygi would lead to little improvement in
revival in India (Puttarudriah and Eswaramurthy the suppression of R. invadens (Godfray and
1976). Waage 1991). G. tebygi was released in Benin,
390 M. Mani

Gabon, Ghana, Nigeria, Sierra Leone and Zaire. important than the effect of G. tebygi (Bokonon-
In Togo, this parasitoid was established in all Ganta and Neuenschwander 1995).
areas infested by R. invadens. In addition, it In Nigeria, G. tebygi was released in 1991. By
established itself without previous release in 1997 and 1998, G. tebygi was found to have
Congo and Cote d'Ivoire. A. mangicola was crossed all agro-ecological barriers to colonize
released in Benin, Gabon and Sierra Leone since the entire area of infestation nationwide. During
1991 and by mid-1993 was recovered from a few this period, the populations of R. invadens had
sites. It seemed locally established in southern greatly decreased from between 11.0 and 98.0
Benin (Neuenschwander et al. 1994). mealybugs per leaf in 1991 to between 0.0 and
The mealybug population's potential rate of 18.2 mealybugs per leaf in 1998 (Pitan et al.
increase ranged from 0.066/day to 0.078/day. 2000). The population density of G. tebygi was
The potential for increase of the parasitoid was found to be negatively but signicantly corre-
double that of its host. In southern Benin, the lated with mango mealybug population and posi-
population density of R. invadens decreased dur- tively correlated with mango fruit yield.
ing the rainy seasons and peaked during the dry Parasitism was highly correlated with mealybug
seasons. Mealybug eld sex ratios were extremely population and yield, and was considered a major
variable, and the impact of such variability on the factor in the control of the pest and the subse-
mealybugs potential rate of increase was anal- quent increase in mango fruit yield. Rainfall did
ysed. The populations of the exotic encyrtid G. not have a signicant impact on yield, mealybug
tebygi, introduced into Benin in 1988 for control population or sooty mould score (Pitan et al.
of the pest, were synchronized with the mealybug 2002). In Ibadan, Nigeria, signicantly higher
populations. The spatial patterns of parasitism numbers of infested trees and mealybug popula-
distribution in relation to the host population tion, and signicantly lower parasitism levels
density were either independent or directly were found on mango trees in exhaust areas,
density-dependent, both at the tree level and for compared with others. Pollution level was corre-
larger zones. In the two orchards studied, mealy- lated with mealybug population (positively) and
bug populations eventually collapsed and disap- parasitism (negatively) in 2000 and 2007.
peared. It is concluded that the biological control Whereas mealybug population gradually built up
of the mango mealybug by G. tebygi was achieved on hitherto clean trees where pollution sources
by non-equilibrium local dynamics, and should were relocated, parasitoid activity seemed to be
be evaluated in a metapopulation perspective enhanced by the relocation of smoke sources.
(Boavida and Neuenschwander 1995). The effectiveness and conservation of the para-
In Benin, within 3 years, G. tebygi had colo- sitoids may therefore depend on the air quality
nized the entire area of infestation, and was found around the infested trees (Pitan 2008).
on practically all infested mango trees as well as Mango mealybug R. invadens an exotic pest of
other infested host plants. The percentage of mango was achieved with the release of parasit-
infested mango trees declined from 31 % in 1989 oids in African countries. Most producers attrib-
to 17.5 % in 1991. Average mealybug densities uted the observed improvement of mango
declined steadily from 9.7 females/48 leaves in production to the success of biological control.
1989 to 6.4 females/48 leaves in 1991. In multi- Based on production estimates by producers, the
ple regression analyses, based on 23 meteoro- negative impact of the pest on plant production
logical, agronomic and plant variables, the and the positive impact of the introduced natural
duration of the parasitoid's presence proved to be enemy were demonstrated. Interviewed mango
the major factor. It inuenced mealybug popula- producers gained on average US$ 328 per year by
tion densities and sooty mould incidence, which the biological control programme. Extrapolated to
in turn, affected the production of new leaves. In all producers of Benin, a yearly gain of US$ 50
all analyses, the impact of rainfall, for example, million in mango production was estimated. The
on the sooty mould or the mealybug was less value of accrued benets was estimated at US$
41 Fruit Crops: Mango 391

531 million over a period of 20 years. The total 41.5.3 Ferrisia virgata
cost of the biological control of mango mealybug
was estimated at US$ 3.66 million, which included At times, fruits were found covered with F. vir-
initial costs in other African countries and the gata in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. C. montrouz-
introduction of the natural enemy from India, ieri was suggested for the suppression of the
resulting in a benetcost ratio of 145:1 for bene- mealybug (Anonymous 1987).
ts in Benin alone (Bokonon-Ganta et al. 2002).
The mango mealybug species are serious pests
on mangoes in South Africa and result in consid- References
erable nancial losses due to the downgrading of
mango fruits. Application of thiamethoxam at the Agricola U (1993) Behaviour of the fruit-tree mealybug
Rastrococcus invadens Williams (Hemiptera:
point of drip irrigation was most effective, result-
Pseudococcidae) at high temperatures in Togo.
ing in approximately 90 % of the crop being of [German]. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft
export quality. The untreated control plots fur Allgemeine und Angewandte Entomologie
yielded signicantly less fruit of export quality 8(46):771774
Agricola U, Agounke D, Fischer HU, Moore D (1990)
(Lagadec et al. 2009).
Biology of the mealybug Rastrococcus invadens
Williams (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and its control
with Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes (Hymenoptera:
41.5 India Encyrtidae) in Togo. Mitteilungen der Deutschen
Gesellschaft fur Allgemeine und Angewandte
Entomologie 7(46):647652
C. montrouzieri was found to be very effective in Ali M (1970) A catalogue of the oriental coccoidea. Part
suppressing R. invadens during April 1995 in IV. Bull Indian Mus 5(2):71150
Karnataka. Due to the release of C. montrouzieri Anonymous (1987) Annual report of all India coordinated
research project on biological control of crop pests and
on mango plants in February 1995, there was
weeds. Tech Doc No 20, 236 p
99.44 % reduction in the meal-bug population R. Ausaf R, Ahmed H (1973) Comparative toxicity of some
invadens from second week of February to the organophosphorus and carbamate insecticides to the
rst week of April on mango cv. Alphonso. The mealy bug, Rastrococcus spinosus (Rob.). Pak J Zool
5(2):205206
mealybug population showed 102.82 % increase
Beardsley JW Jr (1986) Taxonomic notes on Pseudococcus
in the same period on the control plants (Mani elisae Borkhsenius, a mealybug new to the Hawaiian
and Krishnamoorthy 2001). fauna (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Proc Hawaiian
Entomol Soc 26:3133
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
41.5.1 Rastrococcus spinosus Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
Salithion [2-methoxy-4H-1, 3, 2-benzo ioxa- importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
Boavida C, Neuenschwander P (1995) Inuence of host
phosphorine 2 sulphide], fenitrothion, carbaryl,
plant on the mango mealybug, Rastrococcus invadens.
dimethoate, methyl-parathion and phosphamidon Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
were 26.6, 1.2, 1.2, 1.1, 0.9 and 0.7 times as toxic 76(2):179188
to Rastrococcus spinosus, respectively, as mala- Bodkin GE (1931) Entomological service. Rep Palestine
Dept Agric For 19271930, pp 4855
thion, for which the LC50 was 0.4458 % (Ausaf
Bokonon-Ganta AH, de Groote H, Neuenschwander P
and Ahmed 1973). (2002) Socio-economic impact of biological control of
mango mealybug in Benin. Agric Ecosyst Environ
93(1/3):367378
Bokonon-Ganta AH, Neuenschwander P (1995) Impact of
41.5.2 Nipaecoccus viridis the biological control agent Gyranusoidea tebygi
Noyes (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on the mango
Release of Cryptolaemus grubs has cleared mealybug, Rastrococcus invadens Williams
mealybug colonies on mango at Hindupur (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), in Benin. Biocontrol
Sci Tech 5(1):95107
(Anonymous 1987).
392 M. Mani

Cham D, Davis H, Ofori DO, Owusu E (2011) Host range Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A, Pattar GL (1995) Biological
of the newly invasive mealybug species Paracocccus control of the mango mealybug, Rastrococcus iceryoi-
marginatus Williams and Granara De Willink des (Green) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Pest
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in two ecological zones Manage Hortic Ecosyst 1:1520
of Ghana. Res Zool 1(1):17 Manjunath TM (1986) Recent outbreaks of mealybugs
Das BK, Sahoo AK (2005) Record of parasitoids of some and their biological control in Resurgence of sucking
scale and mealybug pests of mango from West Bengal, pests. In: Jeyaraj S (ed) Proceedings of National sym-
India. J Biol Control 19(1):7172 posium. TNAU, Coimbatore, pp 249253
Galanihe LD, Jayasundera MUP, Vithana A, Marotta S, Van Harten A, Mahyoub MA (2001) Mealybugs
Asselaarachchi N, Watson GW (2010) Occurrence, found on agricultural crops in Yemen. Bollettino di
distribution and control of papaya mealybug, Zoologia Agraria e di Bachicoltura 33(3):233238
Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), Moore D, Cross AE (1992) Competition between two pri-
an invasive alien pest in Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res mary parasitoids, Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes and
Ext 13(3):8186 Anagyrus mangicola Noyes, attacking the mealybug
Galanihe LD, Watson GW (2012) Identication of Rastrococcus invadens Williams and the inuence of a
Rastrococcus rubellus WILLIAMS (hemiptera: pseu- hyperparasitoid Chartocerus hyalipennis Hayat.
dococcidae) on mango: a new record to Sri Lanka. Biocontrol Sci Tech 2(3):225234
Trop Agric Res Ext 15(2):710 Muniappan R, Shepard BM, Watson GW, Carner GR,
Germain JF, Vayssieres JF, Matile-Ferrero D (2010) Sartiami D, Rauf A, Hammig MD (2008) First report
Preliminary inventory of scale insects on mango trees of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus
in Benin. Entomologia Hellenica 19:124131 (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), in Indonesia and India.
Ghose SK (1961) Studies on some coccids (Coccoidea: J Agric Urban Entomol 25(1):3740
Hemiptera) of economic importance of West Bengal, Narasimham AU, Chacko MJ (1988) Rastrococcus spp.
India. Indian Agric 5(1):5779 (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and their natural ene-
Godse SK, Bhole SR (2003) Mango mealybug fauna of mies in India as potential biocontrol agents for R.
Konkan Region of Maharashtra. Insect Environ invadens Williams. Bull Entomol Res 78:703708
9(4):157 Neuenschwander P, Boavida C, Bokonon-Ganta A, Gado
Godfray HCJ, Waage JK (1991) Predictive modelling in A, Herren HR (1994) Establishment and spread of
biological control: the mango mealy bug (Rastrococcus Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes and Anagyrus mangicola
invadens) and its parasitoids. J Appl Ecol Noyes (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), two biological
28(2):434453 control agents released against the mango mealybug
Hala N, Kehe M, Allou K (2004) Incidence of the mango Rastrococcus invadens Williams (Homoptera:
mealy bug Rastrococcus invadens Williams, 1986 Pseudococcidae) in Africa. Biocontrol Sci Tech
(Homoptera; Pseudococcidae) in the Ivory Coast. 4(1):6169
[French]. Agron Afr 16(3):2936 Pitan OOR (2008) Variations in the population of the
Ivbijaro MF, Udensis N, Ukwela UM, Anno-Nyako FV mango mealybug Rastrococcus invadens (Homoptera:
(1992) Geographical distribution and host range in Pseudococcidae), and its parasitism, in relation to
Nigeria of the mango mealy bug, Rastrococcus smoke pollution. Int J Trop Insect Sci 28(3):119125
invadens Williams, a serious exotic pest of horti- Pitan OOR, Akinlosotu TA, Odebiyi JA (2000) Impact of
culture and other crops. Insect Sci Appl Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes (Hymenoptera:
13(3):411416 Encyrtidae) on the mango mealybug Rastrococcus
Jacob Mathew (2011) Status of papaya mealybug on rub- invadens Williams (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in
ber in Kerala. In: Proceedings of the National consula- Nigeria. Biocontrol Sci Tech 10(3):245254
tion meeting on strategies for deployment and impact Pitan OOR, Mwansat G, Akinyemi SOS, Adebayo OS,
of the imported parasitoids of papaya mealybug, Akiniosotu TA (2002) Effect of mango mealybug and
Classical biological control of papaya mealybug sooty mould attack on mango and the impact of the
(Paracoccus marginatus) in India, p 60 released Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes on yield. Fruits
Lagadec MD, Le Louw CE, Labuschagne C (2009) The (Paris) 57(2):105113
control of scale insects and mealybugs on mangoes in Puttarudriah M, Eswaramurthy S (1976) Planococcoides
South Africa using neo-nicotinoids. A review of the sp. nr. Robustus- a mango root mealybug and its con-
experimental work from 2001 to 2005. Acta Horticult trol. Curr Res 5(12):205207
820:549557 Pramanik A, Ghose SK (1991) Observations on the biol-
Luhanga WW, Gwinner J (1993) Mango mealybug ogy of the mango mealybug, Rastrococcus iceryoides
(Rastrococcus iceryoides) on Mangifera indica in (Green) (Pseudococcidae, Homoptera). Ann Entomol
Malawi. FAO Plant Prot Bull 41(2):125126 9(1):2530
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (2001) Evaluation of Rawat RR, Jackmola SS (1970) Bionomics of the mango
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. (Coleoptera: coccid Rastrococcus iceryoides (Green) (Homoptera;
Coccinellidae) in the suppression of Rastrococcus Pseudococcidae). Indian J Agric Sci 40:140144
invadens Williams on mango. J Insect Sci 14:6364
41 Fruit Crops: Mango 393

Ronald A, Heu, Mach T Fukada, Patrick Conant (2007) plants and their natural enemies at Bhagalpur. Proc
Papaya Mealybug Paracoccus marginatus Williams Nat Acad Sci India 55:1317
and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Swarbrick JT, Donaldson JF (1991) Host range studies
New Pest Advisory. http://www.hawaiiag.org/hdoa/ with the lantana mealybug (Phenacoccus parvus
npa/npa04-03-PMB.pdf Morrison). Plant Protect Quart 6(2):6869
Rosas-Garcia NM, Parra-Bracamonte GM (2011) Tandon PL, LaL B (1978) The mango coccid, Rastrococcus
Incidence of the pink hibiscus mealybug in mango cul- iceryoides Green (Homoptera, Coccidae) and its natu-
tivars from Nayarit, Mexico [Spanish]. Acta Zoologica ral enemies. Curr Sci 47:4648
Mexicana 27(2):407418 Varshney RK (1985) A review of Indian coccids
Shafee SA, Alam SM, Agarwal MM (1975) Alig Mus (Homoptera: Coccoidea). Orient Insects 19:1101
Univ Publ (Zool. Ser.) Ind Ins Type, 245 p Vogele JM, Agounke D, Moore D (1991) Biological con-
Shylesha AN, Rabindra RJ, Bhumannavar BS (2011) The trol of the fruit tree mealybug Rastrococcus invadens
papaya mealybug Paracoccus marginatus Williams in Togo: a preliminary sociological and eco-
(Coccoidea:Pseudococcidae). In: Proceedings of the nomic evaluation. Trop Pest Manage 37(4):379382
National consulation meeting on strategies for deploy- Walker A, Hoy M, Meyerdirk DE (2003) Papaya
ment and impact of the imported parasitoids of papaya Mealybug. University of Florida featured Creatures.
mealybug classical biological control of papaya http://creatures.ifas.u.edu/fruit/mealybugs/papa
mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) in India, pp 18 Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Sinha PK, Sayeed MZ, Dinesh DS (1985) A report on the Natural History Museum/BHD, London/Southdene
mealybugs (Hemiptera:Pseudococcidae), their host SDN/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Fruit Crops: Papaya
42
M. Mani, M. Kalyanasundaram, and C. Shivaraju

42.1 Species 42.2 Papaya Mealybug:


Paracoccus marginatus
Mealybugs are reported to be injurious to papaya
plantation in several countries (Table 42.1). Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de
Papaya hardly suffers heavily from insect dam- Willink popularly known as papaya mealybug
age in India until the recent introduction of the (PMB) has invaded several countries and dam-
mealybug Paracoccus marginatus Williams & aged many economically important crop plants
Granara de Willink which had caused heavy loss (Muniappan et al. 2008; Shylesha et al. 2011a). It
to papaya growers (Muniappan et al. 2008). is hard to kill pest with conventional insecti-
cides because of protected habitat and waxy coat-
ing over the body.

42.2.1 Origin and Distribution

Paracoccus marginatus Williams & Granara de


Willink is native to Mexico and/or Central and
North America (Miller et al. 1999; Watson and
Chandler 1999). Since its rst description in 1992
from new tropical region, P. marginatus has spread
to several Caribbean islands and central and south
America (Miller et al. 1999; Matile-Ferrero et al.
2000; Kauffman et al. 2001b; Watson and Chandler
Planococcus citri on papaya 1999; Miller and Miller 2002), Mexico (Williams
and Granara de Willink 1992); U.S. Virgin Islands
(CABI/EPPO 2000); The Dominican Republic
M. Mani (*) C. Shivaraju (CABI/EPPO 2000) and Grenada in 1994, Antigua
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
and Barbuda (CABI/EPPO 2000), Saint Martin
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in (Pollard 1999) and The British Virgin Islands in
1996 (CABI/EPPO 2000); USA (Florida) (Pollard
M. Kalyanasundaram
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, 1999; Miller and Miller 2002; Walker et al. 2006),
Coimbatore 641003, India Haiti, St. Kitts and Nevis (CABI/EPPO 2000); St

Springer India 2016 395


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_42
396 M. Mani et al.

Table 42.1 List of mealybugs recorded on papaya in dif- Barthlemy (Ben-Dov 2008), Guatemala (Ben-
ferent regions of the world
Dov 2008), Haiti (CABI/EPPO 2000), and
Species Country Reference Guadaloupe (Ben-Dov 2008) in 1998; French
Dysmicoccus Brazil Culik et al. (2006) Guyana (Ben-Dov 2008), Guiana (Ben-Dov 2008),
grassii Cuba Angeles Martinez et al. Guadeloupe (Matile Ferrero and Etienne 1998),
(Leonardi) (2001)
Cuba (CABI/EPPO 2000), and Puerto Rico in
Dysmicoccus Austro- Ben-Dov (1994)
1999 (CABI/EPPO 2000); Barbados (CABI/EPPO
nesophilus oriental
Williams & and 2000); Belize (Ben-Dov 2010), the Cayman Islands
Watson Pacic (CABI/EPPO 2000), Costa Rica (Ben-Dov 2010),
region Cayman and Montserrat in 2000 (CABI/EPPO
Ferrisia virgata Ben-Dov (1994) 2000), Nether lands Antilles (CABI/EPPO 2000),
(Cockerell)
the Bahamas and Guam in 20022003 (Meyerdirk
Maconellicoccus Florida Anonymous (2003)
hirsutus (Green)
et al. 2004); Palau in 2003 (Anonymous 2003;
Niapecoccus Ben-Dov (1994) Muniappan et al. 2006) and neighbouring islands
nipae (Makell) in the Pacic (Meyerdirk et al. 2004); Hawaii-Maui
Planococcus and Oahu in 2004 (Heu and Fukada 2005; Heu
citri (Risso) et al. 2007), the Northern Marianas (Tinian) in
Planococcus Trinidad Francis et al. (2012) 2005, and the Northern Marianas (Tinian) in 2005.
minor (Maskell) In Africa, it was reported in Ghana in 2009
Phenacoccus India (Cham et al. 2011). It was noticed in South and
solenopsisTinsley
South East Asian region during 20082009. In
Pseudococcus India Mani et al. (2013a, b)
jackbeardsleyi May 2008, it was recorded in Java, Indonesia and
Many Ben-Dov et al.(2001)
Gimpel and countries spread to Bali and Sulawesi Islands (Muniappan
Miller et al. 2008; 2009). It was also reported in July
Paracoccus Ghana Cham et al. (2011) 2008 in Colombo and Gampaha districts in Sri
marginatus India Cham et al. (2011); Lanka (Galanihe et al. 2010), Joyedpur in
Williams and Shylesha et al.
Granara de (2011d); Tanwar et al.
Bangladesh; Phnom Penh in Cambodia in 2010,
Willink 2010; Mani Manila in Philippines in 2008; Thailand in 2010
Chellappan (2011a); (Muniappan et al. 2009). The pest was rst
Muniappan et al. reported from Negeri Sembilan and Selangor in
(2008); Jacob Mathew
(2011)
Malaysia in February, 2009 (Muniappan et al.
Florida Walker et al. (2003),
2008; Mastoi et al. 2011 ) and Taiwan in 2010
Miller and Miller (Chen et al. 2011) and Maldives very recently.
(2002) In India, it was found at Coimbatore in July
Sri Lanka Galanihe et al. (2010) 2008 in Tamil Nadu (Muniappan et al. 2008;
Malaysia Mastoi et al. (2011) Regupathy and Ayyasamy 2009; Suresh et al. 2010).
Puerto Pantoja et al. (2007) Since July 2008 from Coimbatore in Tamil Nadu, it
Rico has spread subsequently neighbouring states such
Indonesia Muniappan as Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra,
et al.(2008)
Kerala, Tripura, Jorat and Orissa in India (Shylesha
Hawaii Ronald et al. (2007)
et al. 2011c; Rabindra 2010; Krishnamoorthy and
Palau Muniappan
et al.(2006) Mani 2011; Sajeev 2011; Jacob Mathew 2011;
Pseudococcus Ben-Dov et al.(2001) Mani Chellappan 2011a; Chandele et al. 2011; Lyla
viburni and Philip 2010; Krishnakumar and Rajan 2009;
(Signoret) Mahalingam et al. 2010; Suresh et al. 2010).
Pseudococcus Ben-Dov et al.(2001)
longispinus
(Targioni
Taxonomy Paracoccus marginatus Williams &
Tozzetti) Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)
42 Fruit Crops: Papaya 397

specimens were collected rst in 1955 in Mexico, stem. While feeding, it injects a toxic substance
but it was described in 1992 from the specimen into the leaves resulting in curling, crinkling,
collected in neotropical region (Belize, Costa rosetting, twisting and general leaf distortion
Rica, Guatemala and Mexico) by Williams and (Miller et al. 1999; Walker et al. 2003; Heu and
Granara de Willink (1992) and re-described by Fukada 2005; Pantoja et al. 2007). Heavy
Miller and Miller (2002) and also Angeles mealybug infestations render fruit inedible. Due
Martinez and De Los Suris (2005). Miller and to the build-up of thick white waxy coating and
Miller (2002) gave a complete description of all sooty mould development on the honeydew
the stages of the papaya mealybug. excreted by mealybug, infested fruits get reduced
market value. Fruits may fail to develop normally
Damage Papaya mealybug infestations are typi- and may be unusually small. Such fruits eventu-
cally observed as clusters of cotton-like masses ally shrivel and drop (Tanwar et al. 2010; Heu
on the above-ground portion of plants. Paracoccus et al. 2007). Some economically important crops
marginatus damages various parts of the host such as papaya, mulberry, cotton, cassava, citrus,
plant including the leaves, stems, owers and sweet potato, peas and beans, okra, eggplant,
fruits. P. marginatus may show very similar guava and ornamentals such as hibiscus,
symptoms to pink hibiscus mealybug Jathropha, Allamanda, Acalypha were severely
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) (Pollard damaged by P. marginatus (Miller and Miller
1999). The insect sucks the sap by inserting its 2002; Mccomie 2000; Meyerdirk et al. 2004;
stylets into the epidermis of the leaf, fruit and Shylesha et al. 2011b).

Damage by P. marginatus

Ecology Mealybug occurs throughout the year ably does not tolerate cold conditions (CAB
but is active in warm dry weather. Prolonged International 2001). Heavy rains caused mortal-
drought with scanty rainfall and less number of ity of PMB especially of the crawlers stage.
rainy days favour the faster multiplication
(Ayyasamy and Regupathy 2010). During the
rainy season, papaya mealybug populations 42.2.2 Host Plants
decreased drastically because heavy rain washed
the insects off the plants. However, mealybugs It is highly polyphagus insect pest that can dam-
sheltered within unopened leaves and other hid- age large number of tropical and subtropical
ing places survived and built up their numbers fruits, vegetables and ornamental plants (Miller
again during the warm, dry weather. The climatic and Miller 2002). According to Muniappan et al.
preferences of P. marginatus have been docu- (2008), it was known to infest plants belonging to
mented well, but its occurrence in countries 22 families from Asia. Galanihe et al. (2010)
located 30 C from the Equator suggest that prob- recorded more than 40 plant species in Sri Lanka
398 M. Mani et al.

compared to 55 plants species recorded in Florida prevent the movement from one state to other
(Walker et al. 2003). Paracoccus marginatus states within the country (Tanwar et al. 2010).
attacks over 60 species of plants including eld
crops, fruit trees ornamentals, weed and scrub 42.2.4.2 Cultural Control
vegetation in India (Shylesha et al. 2011b). Planting material free from mealybugs is to be
used. In the initial stages of appearance of mealy-
bug, collection and destruction of infested plant
42.2.3 Natural Enemies parts are to be carried out (Ayyasamy and
Regupathy 2010; Tanwar et al. 2010).
It has never gained status as pest in the native
home of Mexico, Central and North America 42.2.4.3 Chemical Control
probably due to presence of endemic natural Chemicals were used desperately when there was
enemy complex (Walker et al. 2003). The papaya outbreak of mealybugs, and other methods were
mealybug became pest when it invaded the not available immediately. A number of insecti-
Caribbean region mainly due to the absence of cides like monocrotophos, methyl demeton,
natural enemies. Spalgius epeus Westwood was dimethoate, acephate, methomyl, fenthion, imi-
the predominant natural enemy on papaya mealy- dacloprid, thiomethoxam, dichlorovos, quinal-
bug damaging several host plants in South India phos, profenophos, fenitrothion, carbaryl,
(Thangamalar et al. 2010). Cryptolaemus mon- chlorpyriphos, diazinon, malathion, buprofezin
trouzieri Mulsant a general predator of mealybug were used against papaya mealybug (Tanwar
was also recorded occasionally on papaya mealy- et al. 2010; Regupathy and Ayyasamy 2009;
bug in India and elsewhere. Parasitoids of P. mar- Mahalingam et al. 2010; Banu et al. 2010; Suresh
ginatus from Mexico and Caribbean are listed by et al. 2010). They give short-term control but
Schauff (2000). Four species of chalcidoid para- chemical control is difcult and requires repeated
sitoids and two predators were found attacking application of the insecticides (Tanwar et al.
PMB in Malaysia (Mastoi et al. 2011). 2010; Ayyasamy and Regupathy 2010;
A total of 22 natural enemies occurring either Galanihe et al. 2010). The chemicals were
naturally/introduced were reported on papaya recommended for the control of the mealybug
mealybug in different countries (Mani et al. until the biological control agents could be
2012; Table 42.2. introduced.

42.2.4.4 Biopesticides
42.2.4 Management Fish oil rosin soap, azadirachtin and white min-
eral oils were found partially effective against
Mealybugs are difcult to control because they papaya mealybug. The three fungal pathogens
live in protected areas such as cracks, crevices Verticillium lecanii (Zimm.), Beauria bessiana
and under the bark of their host plants. Most of (Bals.) and Metarhium anisopliae (Metsch.) were
the stages including eggs of mealybug are cov- known to cause 4050 % mortality of P. margin-
ered with waxy secretions that protect them. An atus (Banu et al. 2010).
integrated pest management (IPM) approach
involving cultural practices, legal, chemical and 42.2.4.5 Biological Control
biological control is advisable. Though several methods were available, excel-
lent control of mealybug was obtained with use
42.2.4.1 Legal of biocontrol agent throughout the World
Strict quarantine measures are needed to prevent (Meyerdirk 2000). In the case of PMB also, out-
the entry of mealybug infested planting materi- standing control was achieved with use of para-
als/fruits/owers from other countries. Domestic sitoids in several countries (Mani et al. 2012;
quarantine measures are to be strengthened to Shylesha et al. 2011c).
42 Fruit Crops: Papaya 399

Parasitoids of P. marginatus

A. papayae P. mexicana A. loecki

42.2.4.6 Guam Rico, and released in Guam from June to October,


P. marginatus was reported in April 2002; Survey 2002. Establishment of the parasitoids was con-
of P. marginatus in Guam before the release of rmed within a month of release at the sample
the parasitoids showed that there were no local sites and releases were continued at other geo-
parasitoids recorded on this mealybug. A few graphical locations across the Island. A reduction
coccinellids such as C. montrouzieri and of over 99 % of PMB was observed about a year
Chilocorus nigrita (Fabricius) were however of introduction of these parasitoids. By August
found feeding on it. They were not capable of 2003, the population of PMB declined to a level
suppressing the populations of P. marginatus. which was hard to nd in the eld. Almost all
The parasitoids, Acerophagus papayae, Anagyrus papaya, Plumeria spp. and Hibiscus spp. plants
loecki and Pseudleptomastix mexicana totalling recovered and no symptoms of damage were
46,200 individuals were introduced from Puerto noted at that time (Meyerdirk et al. 2004).

A. papayae on P. marginatus Coccons of A. papayae


400 M. Mani et al.

Table 42.2 List of natural enemies on Paracoccus marginatus


Family and species Country References
Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae India Shylesha et al. (2011d); Tanwar et al.
2010; Jothi et al. (2011); Ayyasamy
and Regupathy (2010); Chandele et al.
(2011); Qadri (2011); Nakat et al.
(2011); Kalyanasundaram et al.
(2011); Muniappan et al. (2008);
Jacob Mathew (2011)
Acerophagus papayae Noyes and Schauff Indonesia Muniappan et al. (2008)
Sri Lanka Galanihe et al. (2010)
Malaysia Mastoi et al. (2011)
Puerto Rico Pantoja et al. (2007)
Indonesia Muniappan et al. (2008)
Hawaii Palau Ronald et al. (2007)
Florida Muniappan et al. (2006)
Mexico Kaushalya et al. (2008), Miller and
Miller (2002), Meyerdirk and
Kauffman (2001)
Anagyrus loecki Noyes India Shylesha et al. (2011d); Tanwar et al.
2010; Jothi et al. (2011); Ayyasamy
and Regupathy (2010); Chandele et al.
(2011); Qadri (2011); Nakat et al.
(2011); Kalyanasundaram et al. (2011)
Muniappan et al. (2008); Jacob
Mathew (2011)
Indonesia Muniappan et al. (2008)
Sri Lanka Galanihe et al. (2010)
Malaysia Mastoi et al. (2011)
Puerto Rico Pantoja et al. (2007)
Indonesia Muniappan et al. (2008)
Hawaii Palau Ronald et al. (2007)
Florida Muniappan et al. (2006)
Mexico Kaushalya et al. (2008); Miller and
Miller (2002)
Meyerdirk and Kauffman (2001)
Apoanagyrus californicus Compere Mexico Meyerdirk and Kauffman (2001)
Puerto Rico Pantoja et al. (2007)
(continued)
42 Fruit Crops: Papaya 401

Table 42.2 (continued)


Family and species Country References
Pseudleptomastrix mexicana Noyes and India Shylesha et al. (2011d); Tanwar et al.
Schauff 2010; Ayyasamy and Regupathy
(2010); Chandele et al. (2011); Qadri
(2011); Nakat et al. (2011);
Muniappan, et al. (2008);
Kalyanasundaram et al. (2011)
Indonesia Muniappan et al. (2008)
Sri Lanka Galanihe et al. (2010)
Malaysia Mastoi et al. (2011)
Puerto Rico Pantoja et al. (2007)
Florida Miller and Miller (2002)
Indonesia Muniappan et al. (2008)
Hawaii Palau Ronald et al. (2007)
Florida Muniappan et al. (2006)
Mexico Kaushalya et al. (2008)
Guam Meyerdirk and Kauffman (2001)
Meyerdirk et al. (2004)
Pseudaphycus sp. Mexico Meyerdirk and Kauffman (2001)
Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae India Shylesha et al. (2011d); Tanwar et al.
Spalgis epius (Westwood) 2010; Jothi et al. (2011); Jonathan
et al. (2011); Thangamalar et al.
2010); Krishnamoorthy and Mani
(2011); Chandele et al. (2011); Nakat
et al. (2011)
Coleoptera: Coccinellidae India Shylesha et al. (2011d); Tanwar et al.
2010; Nakat et al. (2011); Jothi et al.
(2011); Ayyasamy and Regupathy
(2010); Jonathan et al. (2011)
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant Malaysia Mastoi et al. (2011)
Palau Muniappan et al. (2008)
Hawaii Ronald et al. (2007)
Florida Anonymous (2010)
Guam Meyerdirk et al. (2004)
British Virgin Island CAB International (2001)
Nephus bilucernarius (Mulsant) Hawaii Ronald et al. (2007)
Scymnus taiwanus (Ohta) India Shylesha et al. (2011d); Tanwar et al.
2010; Nakat et al. (2011); Chandele
et al. (2011); Jonathan et al. (2011);
Hawaii Ronald et al. (2007)
Brumoides suturalis Fabricius Hawaii Ronald et al. (2007)
Hyperaspis silvestrii Weise Hawaii Ronald et al. (2007)
Curinus coeruleus Mulsant Hawaii Ronald et al. (2007)
Cheilomenus sexmaculata (F.) India Jonathan et al. (2011)
Coccinella transversalis Fabricius India Jonathan et al. (2011)
Neuroptera: Chrysopidae India Shylesha et al. (2011d); Tanwar et al.
Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) 2010; Ayyasamy and Regupathy
(2010)
Apertochrysa sp. Malaysia Mastoi et al. (2011)
(continued)
402 M. Mani et al.

Table 42.2 (continued)


Family and species Country References
Diptera: Syrphidae India Shylesha et al. (2011d); Tanwar et al.
Ischiodon scutellaris F. (2010); Jonathan et al. (2011)
Entomopathogenic fungi India Shylesha et al. (2011d); Ayyasamy
Metarrhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) and Regupathy (2010)
Verticillium lecanii (Zimm.) India Shylesha et al. (2011d); Ayyasamy
and Regupathy (2010); Jonathan et al.
(2011); Mani Chellappan (2011b)
Paecilomyces pictus India Ayyasamy and Regupathy (2010)
Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) India Shylesha et al. (2011d)
Neozygytes India Shylesha et al. (2011d)
Chilocorus nigrita Fab Guam Meyerdirk et al. (2004)
Mexico Gonzalez et al. (1999)

42.2.4.7 Palau papayae (4,800) were released in October, 2009.


The pest was reported in March 2003, and was After 3 months, A. papayae established in all the
causing serious damage to papaya plumeria, sites and subsequently PMB was controlled to
Hibiscus and many other plants. Very few C. level of 90100 % by December, 2009
montrouzieri larvae and adults were encountered (Wahundenya et al. 2009).
on P. marginatus in the survey. The parasitoids A.
loecki, P. mexicana and A. papayae totalling 42.2.4.9 Mexico
24,586 were imported from Puerto Rico, and Biological control appears to be the main factor
released in Palau from August 2003 to June 2004. keeping the mealybug species under control in
Establishment of parasitoids was conrmed Mexico. The most important natural enemies
within a month. A. loecki and A. papayae were the encyrtids, Anagyrus spp., Acerophagus
appeared to be promising biological control spp. and Apoanagyrus spp. The general predators
agents of PMB in Palau. No eld recovery of P. such as Chrysopa spp. and Chilocorus spp. were
mexicana was made in spite of several eld also encountered in low densities on PMB
releases. The reduction of the papaya mealybug (Gonzalez et al. 1999; Walker et al. 2006).
population density levels below detectable levels
was observed in a 6-month period following the 42.2.4.10 Puerto Rico and Dominican
introduction of these exotic parasitoids. Republic
Following the successful implementation of a Paracoccus marginatus was rst intercepted
classical biological control program, the risk of from Puerto Rico in 1995, and by 1998 it was
this mealybug spreading to other islands in the found to be distributed throughout Puerto Rico
Republic of Palau and to neighbouring with a higher density on the west side of the
Micronesian Islands has been considerably Island (Sez 2000). During 20012002, severe
reduced (Muniappan et al. 2006). infestation of papaya mealybug required several
insecticides applications to control pest (Pantoja
42.2.4.8 Sri Lanka et al. 2007). USDA-APHIS found that the ve
The PMB was reported on a large number of parasitoid species, Anagyrus loecki, Apoanagyrus
plant species in Columbo and Gampha district in californicus, Acerophagus sp. and Pseudophycus
Sri Lanka for the rst time in 2008. It has caused sp and Pseudleptomasix mexicana brought about
worst damage in papaya growing districts of Sri a 99.7 % reduction in papaya mealybug popula-
Lanka. A classical biological control work was tions in the Dominican Republic, and a 97 %
initiated in 2009. Three parasitoids A. loecki reduction in Puerto Rico, with parasitism levels
(2,000), P. mexicana (3,200) and Acerophagus of 35.558.3 % (Kauffman et al. 2001a;
42 Fruit Crops: Papaya 403

Meyerdirk and Kauffman 2001). However, Insects, Bangalore during JulyOctober, 2010.
Acerophagus sp. emerged as the dominant para- After ascertaining the safety in quarantine, these
sitoid species in both Puerto Rico and the three parasitoids were distributed to different
Dominican Republic (Meyerdirk and Kauffman states in India. Acerophagus papaya has done
2001; Ramirez and Sez 2002; Walker et al. exceedingly well in Karnataka & Andhra Pradesh
2003; Arnold 2001; Kauffman et al. 2001b). ( Shylesha et al. 2011c; Krishanamoorthy et al.
2011; Qadri et al. 2011), Maharashtra (Pokharkar
42.2.4.11 Florida et al. 2011; Mundale and Nakat 2011; Chandele
Paracoccus marginatus was discovered in et al. 2011; Nakat et al. 2011), Tamil Nadu
Florida 1998. The USDA Animal and Plant (Kalyanasundaram et al. 2011; Jonathan et al.
Health Inspection Service (APHIS) and USDA 2011), Kerala (Mani challappan 2011b; Jacob
Agricultural Research Service (ARS) initiated Methew 2011; Sajeev 2011), Orissa (Shylesha
a classical biological control programme for et al. 2011a) and Tripura state (Agarwala 2011)
the papaya mealybug. Four genera of encyrtid state in India.
endoparasitoid wasps specic to the mealybug C. montrouzieri was found colonizing on P.
were collected in Mexico by USDA and ARS marginatus in India (Shylesha et al. (2011b),
researchers and Mexican cooperators as poten- Malaysia (Mastoi et al. 2011), Palau (Muniappan
tial biological control agents: Acerophagus et al. 2008), Hawaii (Ronald et al. 2007), Florida
papayae, Anagyrus loecki, Anagyrus californi- (Walker et al. 2003), Guam (Meyerdirk et al.
cus and Pseudaphycus sp. (USDA 1999, 2000; 2004) and British Virgin Island (CAB
Meyerdirk and Kauffman 2001). A fth col- International 2001) but proved ineffective in
lected species was later reared and identied as checking the mealybug populations.
Pseudleptomastix mexicana (Noyes and
Schauff 2003). The rst releases of these four 42.2.4.13 Caribbean Islands
parasitoids were made in Florida in October As an exotic introduction to the Caribbean
2000 (Walker et al. 2003) and again released in islands, there were good prospects for control of
2003 (Meyerdirk 2003). Although it is believed P. marginatus by hymenopteran parasitoids origi-
that these parasitoids are established in the nating from its area of origin in Central America
released areas, Acerophagus papayae had (Pollard 1999).
higher per cent parasitism than A. loecki and
there is no recovery of P. mexicana (Kaushalya 42.2.4.14 Malaysia
et al. 2008). Paracoccus marginatus was reported for the rst
time in Malaysia on papaya, cassava, eggplant,
42.2.4.12 India jatropha and hibiscus plants. Four species of
Paracoccus marginatus invaded India in 2008 chalcidoid parasitoids were observed parasitizing
and has become severe on several agricultural the PMB. Acerophagus papayae was the major
and horticultural crops. The potential economic parasitoid of PMB. Two common predators
loss due to this pest ranges from 60 to 80 % in namely Apertochrysa sp. and Cryptolaemus
papaya. The parasitoids Acerophagus papayae, montouzieri were also found feeding on PMB
Pseudleptomastix mexicana and Anagyrus loecki (Mastoi et al. 2011).
from USDA-APHIS Puerto Rico were shipped to
India. A total of 3,429 of A. papayae, 1,485 of P. 42.2.4.15 Taiwan
mexicana and 516 of A. loecki were received by P. marginatus was found damaging papaya in
National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Taiwan for the rst time in 2011. A. papayae was
404 M. Mani et al.

useful in controlling the papaya mealybug in 42.3 Jack Beardsley Mealybug,


Taiwan. Bio-control is to be initiated for the con- Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi
trol of PMB (Chen et al. 2011). Gimpel and Miller

42.2.4.16 Indonesia Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi was found colo-


The papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus nized on papaya in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka in
was recorded in Indonesia (Java) in 2008. India (Mani et al. 2013b), Pseudococcus jack-
Introduction of parasitoid, A. papayae is to be beardsleyi is distributed throughout the neotropi-
carried out in controlling the papaya mealybug in cal region and a few countries in southern Asia
Indonesia (Herlina 2011). (Williams and Watson 1988). It was originally
described as Pseudococcus elisae collected on
42.2.4.17 Ghana banana in Hawaiii by Beardsley (1986). It has
Real Metarhizium is a biopesticide that contains been re-described as the Jack Beardsley mealy-
the active ingredient Metarhizium anisopliae bug- Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi in 1996 by
ICIPE 69 (3%w/v) at 3.0 ml real metarhizium/l Gimpel and Miller (1996). Thus Pseudococcus
of water is known to cause about 75 % mortality jackbeardsleyi Gimpel & Miller is the valid name
of P. marginatus. Application of Real metarhi- but Pseudococcus elisae Borchsenius, cited by
zium at 3 ml/l is recommended for farmers for Beardsley (1986) is a misidentication of
use in the management of the papaya mealybug Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi, discovered by
in Southern parts of Ghana. Gimpel and Miller (1996).

Jack beardsley mealybug Fruit damage by JMB Leaf infestation by JMB

42.3.1 Damage coccinellids were found actively feeding on the


Jack Beardsley mealybug on many papaya
Jack Beardsley mealybugs were found scattered gardens. They were identied as Cryptolaemus
on the leaves, owers, fruits and trunk of papaya montrouzieri (Coccinellidae), Mallada boni-
plant. Heavy colonization was not found on papaya nensis (Okamoto) (Chrysopidae) and Spalgis
plants in the eld. However, in the laboratory, it epeus Westwood (Lycaenidae). Among the
was found in colonies. Like any other mealybug predators the Australian ladybird beetle was
JMB is also phloem feeder. They suck the sap found in large numbers. All stages of C. mon-
from various parts of the host plant including the trouzieri were found amongst the mealybug
leaves, stems, and fruits (Mani et al. 2012). colonies indicating natural colonization on
JMB. Number of larvae ranged from 18 to 30
per papaya leaf. Similarly they were found
42.3.2 Natural Enemies feeding on the mealybugs infesting fruits,
trunk and ower panicles. As many as 300 lar-
A total of three predators were recorded on vae of C. montrouzieri were also found per
JMB. Larvae of green lacewings, lycaenids and plant (Mani et al. 2013a).
42 Fruit Crops: Papaya 405

Colonization of C. montrouzieri on Jackbeardsley Mealybug

Both adults and larvae of C. montrouzieri the population of mealybugs. Hence the reduc-
were found feeding on all the stages of JMB both tion of the mealybugs was attributed mainly to
in the eld and laboratory. A single predatory the action of/by all the three predators particu-
larva had consumed 3.83 (24), 13.75 (1214), larly C. montrouzieri (Mani et al. 2013a).
68.88 (6173) and 172.50 (164179) mealybug Williams and Watson (1988) state There are no
nymphs of 10 days old during the development of records of actual damage but the species is
rst, second, third and fourth instar, respectively. polyphagous and, in the absence of suitable natu-
The larva of C. montrouzieri took 13.85 days to ral enemies, it could be injurious. No classical
complete its development on JMB. The predator biological control attempt has been made for the
took 29.30 days on JMB (Mani et al. 2013a). Jack Beardsley mealybug, and possibly it is kept
under control by the local natural enemies in the
invaded countries (Muniappan et al. 2011).
42.3.3 Biological Control Hence there is no need for any panic for the new
invasive P. jackbeardsleyi in India (Mani et al.
Among the natural enemies C. montrouzieri was 2013a).
found in large numbers followed by S. epeus and
M. boninensis. The results on impact of natural
enemies on the population of JMB on papaya are References
presented in table 3. A mean of 16.6 mealybugs/
plant was observed in mid May 2012. Following Agarwala BK (2011) A preliminary report of the papaya
mealy bug Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera:
the appearance of the mealybugs, the natural ene-
Pseudococcidae) in Tripura. In: Proceedings of the
mies have also started appearing on JMB. The National consulation meeting on strategies for deploy-
mealybug population steadily increased to 179 in ment and impact of the imported parasitoids of papaya
the mid August, and thereafter steadily declined mealybug, Classical biological control of papaya
mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) in India, pp 4546
to 1.72 in the rst week of December. The natural
Amarasekare KG, Mannion CM, Epsky ND (2008) Host
enemies were observed throughout the study Instar susceptibility and selection and interspecic
period. The population of C. montrouzieri competition of three introduced parasitoids of the
reached peak of 65.62/plant in August. During Mealybug Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera:
Pseudococcidae). Environ Entomol 39:15061512
the same period, the mean of 10.00 Spalgis epeus
Angeles Martinez M, De Los Suris M (2005)
and 4.10 M. bonensis/plant were recorded. All Morphological comparison of Paracoccus marginatus
these three predators particularly C. montrouzieri (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) presents in cassava and
played a major role in the suppression of JMB on papaya Cuban eld. [Spanish] Comparacion morfo-
logica de Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera:
papaya. Statistical analysis revealed that there
Pseudococcidae) presentes en plantaciones Cubanas
was no signicant inuence of weather factors on
406 M. Mani et al.

de yuca y frutabomba. Revista de Proteccion Vegetal papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) in India,
20(3):165168 pp 4344
Angeles Martinez M, De Los Blanco E, Perez I (2001) Chen ShupeI, Wong Jenyu, Wu Wenjen (2011) Preliminary
New mealybug hosts of Dysmicoccus ferris (Hem., report on the occurrence of papaya mealybug,
Pseudococcidae) genus in Cuba. Revista de Proteccion Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de
Vegetal 16:23 Willink, in Taiwan. J Taiwan Agric Res
Anonymous (2003) Papaya mealybug, Paracoccus mar- 60(10):7276
ginatus in Palau, Pest Alert, Plant Protection Service, Culik MP, Martins D, Dos S, Gullan PJ (2006) First
Secretariat of the Pacic Community, Fiji, No. 31, 1 p records of two mealybug species in Brazil and new
Anonymous (2010) Paracoccus marginatus. potential pests of papaya and coffee. J Insect Sci
Ebookbrowse.com/paracoccus marginatus.pdf- (Tucson) 6:623
d27631074, 12 Nov 2010 Francis MA, Kairo WTK, Roda AL, Oscar E, Liburd OE,
Arnold J (2001) Parasitic wasp could curb mealybug. Polar P (2012) The passionvine mealybug,
ARS News and Information, United States Department Planococcus minor (Maskell) (Hemiptera:
of Agriculture, August 2001 Pseudococcidae), and its natural enemies in the cocoa
Ayyasamy R, Regupathy A (2010) Need and scope for agroecosystem in Trinidad. Biol Control 60:290296
insecticide resistance management for the invasive Galanihe LD, Jayasundera MUP, Vithana A,
papaya mealy bug Paracoccus marginatus Williams Asselaarachchi N, Watson GW (2010) Occurrence,
and Granara de Willink in small scale papaya farming distribution and control of papaya mealybug,
system in Tamil Nadu, India. Resist Pest Manag Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae),
Newslett 19(2):2328 an invasive alien pest in Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res
Banu JG, Suruliveru T, Amutha M, Gopalakrishnan N Ext 13(3):8186
(2010) Susceptibility of cotton mealybug, Paracoccus Gimpel WF, Miller DR (1996) Systematic analysis of the
marginatus to entomopathogenic fungi. Ann Plant mealybugs in the Pseudococcus maritimus complex
Protect Sci 18:247248 (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Contrib Entomol Inst
Beardsley JW (1986) Taxonomic notes on Pseudococcus 2:1163
elisae Borchsenius, a Mealybug New to the Hawaiian Gonzalez HJ, Villanueva A, Millar DR (1999) Parasitoides
Fauna (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Proc Hawaiian del piojo harinoso delpapayo, Paracoccus marginatus
Entomol Soc 26:3134 Williams Granara de Willink (Homoptera:
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- Pseudococcidae), en Mexico. Memorias del XXII
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Congreso Nacional de Control Bio-lgico, Oct 1999,
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- Montecillo, Mexico
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic Herlina L (2011) Introduction of parasitoid, a new con-
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p cept in controlling papaya mealybugs Paracoccus
Ben-Dov Y (2008) Scale Net, Paracoccus marginatus. 17 marginatus in Indonesia (Indonesian). Journal
September 2008, http://www.sel.barc.usda.gov/cata- Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian 30:8797
logs/pseudoco/Paracoccusmarginatus.htm Heu RA, Fukada MT (2005) Papaya Mealybug,
Ben-Dov Y (2010) ScaleNet, Paracoccus marginatus. Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de
Accessed online 22 July 2010 at ,http://www.sel.barc. Willink (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), State of
usda.gov/catalogs/pseudoco/Paracoccus marginatus. Hawaii, Department of Agriculture, New Pest
htm Advisory No. 0403, 2 p
Ben-Dov Y, Miller DR, Gibson GAP (2001) Scale net, Heu RA, Fukada MT, Conant P (2007) Papaya mealybug,
Scales in a Country Query Results. Accessed online Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de
22 July 2010 at, http://www.sel.barc.usda.gov/scalecgi Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococ-cidae). State of
CABI/EPPO (2000) Paracoccus marginatus. Distribution Hawaii New Pest Advisory. Department of Agriculture
maps of plant pests, Map No. 614. CAB International No. 0403 March 2007
with EPPO. 2 p Ronald A Heu, Mach T, Fukada, Patrick Conant (2007)
Cham D, Davis H, DanieL Obeng OI, Owusu E (2011) Papaya Mealybug Paracoccus marginatus Williams
Host range of the newly invasive mealybug species and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae).
Paracocccus Marginatus Williams and Granara De New Pest Advisory. http://www.hawaiiag.org/hdoa/
Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in two ecologi- npa/npa04-03-PMB.pdf
cal zones of Ghana. Res Zool 1(1):17 CAB International (2001) Crop protection compendium.
Chandele AG, Nakat RV, Pokharkar DS, Dhane AS, CAB International, Wallingford
TambolI ND (2011) Status of papaya mealybug, Jacob Mathew (2011) Status of papaya mealy bug on rub-
Paracoccus marginatus W & G (Hemiptera: ber in Kerala. In: Proceedings of the National consula-
Pseudococcidae) in Maharashtra. In: Proceedings of tion meeting on strategies for deployment and impact
the National consulation meeting on strategies for of the imported parasitoids of papaya mealybug,
deployment and impact of the imported parasitoids of Classical biological control of papaya mealybug
papaya mealybug, Classical biological control of (Paracoccus marginatus) in India, p 60
42 Fruit Crops: Papaya 407

Jonathan EI, Karuppuchamy P, Kalyanasundaram M, mulberry Morus spp. Karnataka J Agric Sci
Suresh S, Mahalingam CA (2011) Status of papaya 23:182183
mealybug in Tamil Nadu and its management. In: Mani Chellappan (2011a) Impact of Acerophagous papa-
Proceedings of the National consulation meeting on yae Noyes and Schauffon Paracoccus marginatus
strategies for deployment and impact of the imported Williams and Granara de Willink in Kerala. In:
parasitoids of papaya mealybug, Classical biological Proceedings of the National consulation meeting on
control of papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) strategies for deployment and impact of the imported
in India, pp 2433 parasitoids of papaya mealybug, Classical biological
Jothi BD, Surulivelu T, Rajan TS, Valarmathi R (2011) control of papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus)
First record on the establishment of the parasitoid in India, pp 8283
(Acerophagus papayae Noyes and Schauff) of papaya Mani Chellappan (2011b) Status of papaya mealybug,
mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de
Granara de Willink) on cotton. Karnataka J Agric Sci Willink in Kerala. In: Proceedings of the National
24:536537 consulation meeting on strategies for deployment and
Kalyanasundaram M, Karuppuchamy P, Divya S, impact of the imported parasitoids of papaya mealy-
SakthiveL P, Rabindra RJ, Shylesha AN (2011) bug, Classical biological control of papaya mealybug
Impact on release of the imported parasitoid aceroph- (Paracoccus marginatus) in India, pp 4042
agus papayae for the management of papaya mealy- Mani M, Shivaraju C, Sylesha AN (2012) Paracoccus
bug Paracoccus marginatus in Tamil nadu. In: marginatus, an invasive mealybug of papaya and its
Proceedings of the National consulation meeting on biological control. J Biol Control 26(3):201216
strategies for deployment and impact of the imported Mani M, Shivaraju C, Kalyanasundaram M, Sunil Joshi,
parasitoids of papaya mealybug, Classical biological Asokan R, Sumana K, Krishnamoorthy A (2013a)
control of papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) Investigations on the new invasive Jack Beardsley
in India, pp 6872 mealybug Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi Gimpel and
Kauffman WC, Myerdirk DE, Miller D, Schauff M, Miller on papaya, Carica papaya L. in India. Paper
HernandeZ HG, Jimenez JAV (2001a) Papaya mealy- presented in the International Symposium on Insect
bug biological control in Puerto Rico and Dominican Science, Bangalore, 1417 Feb 2013
Republic. ESA annual meeting 2001: An Mani M, Joshi S, Kalyanasundaram M, Shivaraju C,
Entomologica1 Odyssey of ESA Krishnamoorthy A, Asokan R, Rebbith KB (2013b) A
Kauffman WC, Meyerdirk DE, Warkentin R, Alvarez P, new invasive Jack Beardsley Pseudococcus jackbeards-
Abud A (2001b) Biological control of papaya mealy- ley Gimpel and Miller (Heiptera; Pseudococcidae) on
bug in the Caribbean safeguarding the US Poster papaya in India. Fla Entomol 96(1):242245
Presentation. International Organization for Biological Mastoi MI, Azura AN, Muhammad R, Idris AB, Ibrahim
Control, Bozeman, Montana, 25 Aug 2001 Y (2011) First report of papaya mealybug Paracoccus
Krishanamoorthy A, Mani M, GangavisalkshI PN, marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from
Gopalakrishna Pillai K (2011) Classical biological Malaysia. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 5(7):12471250
control of papaya mealybug Paracoccus marginatus Matile Ferrero D, Etienne J (1998) Paracoccus margin-
using exotic parasitoid, Acerophagus papayae. In: atus Williams & Granara de Willink, a new introduc-
Proceedings of national symposium on harnessing tion in Guadeloupe and to Saint-Barthelemy
biodiversity for biological control of crop pest, (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae). [French] Paracoccus
abstract, 2525 May 2011, NBAII, Bangalore, p 101 marginatus Williams & Granara de Willink, nouvelle
Krishnakumar R, Rajan VP (2009) Record of papaya introduction en Guadeloupe et a Saint-Barthelemy
mealy bug Paracoccus marginatus infesting mulberry (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae). Revue Francaise
in Kerala. Insect Environ 15(3):142 dEntomologie 20:142
Krishnamoorthy A, Mani M (2011) Occurrence of papaya Matile-Ferrero D, Etienne J, Tiego G (2000) Introduction
mealybug Paracoccus marginatus in Karnataka: IIHR of two important pests to French Guiana:
perspective. In: Proceedings of the National consula- Maconellicoccus hirsutus and Paracoccus marginatus
tion meeting on strategies for deployment and impact (Hem., Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae)[French]. Bulletin
of the imported parasitoids of papaya mealybug, de la Societe Entomologique de France
Classical biological control of papaya mealybug 105(5):485486
(Paracoccus marginatus) in India, pp 3739 Mccomie LD (2000) Progress Report on the Papaya
Lyla KR, Philip BM (2010) Incidence of papaya mealy- Mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) project in St.
bug Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Kitts and Nevis. Presented at Procicaribe Cipmnet
Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Kerala. Meeting 2000, Kingston, St Vincent, 1718 Aug 2000
Insect Environ 15(4):156 MeyerdirK D (2000) Review of mealybug biological con-
Mahalingam CA, Suresh S, Subramania NS, Murugesh trol successes. In: Proceedings of a technical meeting
KA, Mohanraj P, Shanmugam R (2010) Papaya and workshop on biological control of Papaya
mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus a new pest on Mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus, Basseterre, St
Kitts, 2526 July 2000
408 M. Mani et al.

Meyerdirk DE (2003) Control of Papaya Mealybug, Proceedings of the National consulation meeting on
Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae): strategies for deployment and impact of the imported
environmental assessment (Supplement). Center for parasitoids of papaya mealybug, Classical biological
Plant Health Science and Technology, National control of papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus)
Biological Control Institute, Plant Protection and in India, pp 7981
Quarantine, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Noyes JS, Schauff ME (2003) New Encyrtidae
Service, United States Department of Agriculture, (Hymenoptera) from Papaya Mealybug (Paracoccus
Riverdale, MD marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink)
Meyerdirk DE, Kauffman WC (2001) Status on the devel- (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Pseudococcidae). Proc
opment of a biological control program for Paracoccus Entomol Soc Wash 105:180185
marginatus Williams, papaya mealybug, in the Pantoja A, Abreu E, Pena J, Robles W (2007) Paracoccus
Caribbean. Paper presented at IV International marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink
Scientic Seminar of Plant Health. Veradero, Cuba, (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) affecting papaya in
1015 June 2001 (abstract) Puerto Rico. J Agric Univ P R 91(3/4):223225
Meyerdirk DE, Muniappan R, Warkentin R, Bamba J, Pokharkar DS, Nakat RV, Tamboli ND, Dhane AS (2011)
Reddy GV (2004) Biological control of the papaya Papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Willams
mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: and Granare de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)
Pseudococcidae) in Guam. Plant Protect Quart and its natural enemies in Maharashtra. In: National
19(3):110114 symposium on harnessing Biodiversity for biological
Miller DR, Miller GL (2002) Redescription of Paracoccus control of crop pests- abstracts, NBAII, Bangalore,
marginatus Williams, D. J. and Granara de Willink, p 29
(Homoptera:Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), including Pollard GV (1999) Update on new pest introductions.
descriptions of the immature stages and adult male. Paracoccus marginatus. CARAPHIN News 18:7
Proc Entomol Soc Wash 104(1):123 Qadri SMH (2011) Central Silk Board initiatives in tack-
Miller DR, Williams DJ, Hamon AB (1999) Notes on a ling the menace of papaya mealy bug (Paracoccus
new mealybug (Hemiptera:Coccoidea: marginatus) in Mulberry. In: Proceedings of the
Pseudococcidae) pest in Florida and the Caribbean: National consulation meeting on strategies for deploy-
the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus ment and impact of the imported parasitoids of papaya
Williams and Granada de Willink. Insecta Mundi mealybug, Classical biological control of papaya
13:179181 mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) in India, pp 4750
Mundale M, Nakat R (2011) Successful control of papaya Qadri SMH, Shekhar MA, Vinod Kumar, Narendra
mealybug using Acerophagus papayae in farmers Kumar JB (2011) An impact and constraints on the
eld. In: National symposium on harnessing establishment of Acerophagus papayae for the man-
Biodiversity for biological control of crop pests- agement of papaya mealybug in mulberry ecosystem.
abstracts, NBAII, Bangalore, p 27 In: National symposium on harnessing Biodiversity
Muniappan R, Meyerdirk DE, Sengebau FM, Berringer for biological control of crop pests- abstracts, NBAII,
DD, Reddy GVP (2006) Classical biological control Bangalore, p 37
of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Rabindra RJ (2010) NBAII pioneers successful classical
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the Republic of biological control of papaya mealybug. NBAII
Palau. Fla Entomol 89:212217 Newslett 11(2):1
Muniappan R, Shepard BM, Watson GW, Carner GR, Ramirez A, Sez L (2002) Papaya mealybug (Paracoccus
SartiamI D, Rauf A, Hammig MD (2008) First report marginatus) in Puerto Rico. Biological Control
of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Laboratory, Dept. Agriculture of Puerto Rico. Training
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), in Indonesia and India. Workshop Papaya Mealybug Biological Control
J Agric Urban Entomol 25(1):3740 Program, 2325 Oct 2002, SanJuan, Puerto Rico, 7 p
Muniappan R, Shepard BM, Watson GW, Carner GR, Regupathy A, Ayyasamy R (2009) Need for generating
Rauf A, SartiamI D, Hidayat P, Afun JVK, Ziaur baseline data for monitoring insecticide resistance in
Rahman AKM (2009) New records of invasive insects new invasive mealy bug Paracoccus marginatus
(Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha) in Southeast Asia and Williams and Granara de Willink (Insecta: Hemiptera:
West Africa. J Agric Urban Entomol 26:167174 Pseudococcidae), the key pest of papaya and biofuel
Muniappan R, Shepard BM, Watson GW, Carner GR, crop, Jatropha curcas. Resist Pest Manag Newslett
Rauf A, Sartiami D, Hidayat P, Afun JCK (2011) New 19:3740
records of invasive insects (Hemiptera: Sez L (2000) Parasitoides naturales de la chinche hari-
Sternorrhyncha) in southern Asia and West Africa. nosa de la papaya, Paracoccus marginatus (Williams y
J Agric Urban Entomol 26(4):167174 Granara de Willink) y parasitoides naturales e
Nakat RV, PokharkaR DS, Dhane AS, TambolI ND (2011) importadosde la chinche harinosa rosada del hibisco
Biological impact of Acerophagus papayae (N & S) (Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) en dosregiones en
on suppression of papaya mealybug Paracoccus mar- Puerto Rico. Masters thesis, University of Puerto
ginatus (W & G) in Pune region of Maharashtra. In: Rico, MayaguezCampus, 80 p
42 Fruit Crops: Papaya 409

Sajeev TV (2011) Classical biocontrol of Papaya mealy bugs of Tamil Nadu and their management. Karnataka
bug Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: J Agric Sci 23:69
Pseudococcidae): the forestry prespective. In: Tanwar RK, Jeyakumar, Vennila S (2010) Papaya mealy-
Proceedings of the National consulation meeting on bug and its management strategies. NCIPM Technical
strategies for deployment and impact of the imported Bulletin 22, 26 p
parasitoids of papaya mealybug, Classical biological Thangamalar A, Subramanian S, Mahalingam CA (2010)
control of papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) Bionomics of papaya mealybug, Paracoccus margin-
in India, pp 6162 atus and its predator Spalgius epeius in mulberry eco-
Schauff ME (2000) Parasitoids of the Papaya Mealybug system. Karnataka J Agric Sci 23:3941
(Paracoccus marginatus). Systematic Entomology US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health
Laboratory, USDA, ARS, National Museum of Inspection Service (1999) Control of the papaya
Natural History, Washington, DC, 205560111068 mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Homoptera:
Shylesha AN, DhanyavathI PN, Shivaraju C (2011b) Pseudococcidae). Environmental Assessment, October
Mass production of parasitoids for the Classical 1999, Riverdale, MD
Biological Control of Papaya mealybug Paracoccus US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health
marginatus. In: Proceedings of the national consula- Inspection Service (2000) Control of the papaya
tion meeting on strategies for deployment and impact mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Homoptera:
of the imported parasitoids of papaya mealybug, Pseudococcidae). Environmental Assessment
Classical biological control of papaya mealybug (Supplement), June 2000, Riverdale, MD
(Paracoccus marginatus,) in India, pp 6367 Wahundenya I, Wijesekara A, Bhandara KANP, Galaniha
Shylesha AN, Joshi S, Rabindra RJ, Shekhar MA, LD (2009) Papaya mealybug control in Sri Lanka,
Narendra Kumar, Dhanyavathi PN, Shivaraju C Personal Communication
(2011a) A successful case study of classical biological Walker A, Hoy M, Meyerdirk DE (2003) Papaya
control of papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus. Mealybug. Univ. Florida Featured Creatures.http://
National symposium on harnessing Biodiversity for creatures.ifas.u.edu/fruit/mealybugs papaya mealy-
biological control of crop pests- abstracts, NBAII, bug.htm. Accessed on 29 Sept 2008
Bangalore, p 99 Walker A, Hoy M, Meyerdirk D (2006) Papaya mealybug
Shylesha AN, Rabindra RJ, Shekhar MA, Vinod Kumar, (Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de
Narendra Kumar, Krishnamurthy A (2011c) Impact of Willink (Insecta: Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)).
Classical biological control of the papaya mealybug EENY- 302. Featured Creatures. Entomology and
Paracoccus marginatus using Acerophagus papayae Nematology Department, Florida Cooperative
in Karnataka. In: Proceedings of the National consula- Extension Service, Institute of Food and agricultural
tion meeting on strategies for deployment and impact Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
of the imported parasitoids of papaya mealybug, Watson GW, Chandler LR (1999) Identication of
Classical biological control of papaya mealybug Mealybugs important in the Caribbean Region.
(Paracoccus marginatus) in India, pp 7378 Commonwealth Science Council and CAB
Shylesha AN, Rabindra RJ, Bhumannavar BS (2011d) International, CARINET, 40 pp
The papaya mealybug Paracoccus marginatus Williams DJ, Granara De Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs
(Coccoidea:Pseudococcidae). In: Proceedings of the of Central and South America. CAB International,
National consulation meeting on strategies for deploy- Wallingford, England, 635 p
ment and impact of the imported parasitoids of papaya Williams DJ, Watson GW (1988) The scale insects of
mealybug classical biological control of papaya the tropical south pacic region Part 2 The
mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) in India, pp 18 Mealybugs (Pseudococcidae). CAB International
Suresh S, Jothimani R, Sivasubrmanian P, Karuppuchamy Institute of Entomology, The Cambrian News Ltd.,
P, Samiyappan R, Jonathan EI (2010) Invasive mealy- Aberystwyth
Fruit Crops: Pineapple
43
M. Mani

43.1 Species South America. Dysmicoccus brevipes is known


to attack pine apple in several countries including
Pineapple plants worldwide are infested with India. This mealy bug generally occurs in moist
mealybugs feeding on the plant sap. Pink pine- tropical areas where pineapples are grown. It has
apple mealybug (PPM) Dysmicoccus brevipes been a prominent pest in Mauritius, tropical
(Cockerell), and grey pineapple mealybug (GPM) Africa, the South Pacic Islands, Hawaii, and the
Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Beardsley are the Philippines, Taiwan, and in common in the West
mealybugs associated with pine apple plant Indies, South and Central America, with its dis-
(Beardsley 1964). PPM is the most widely dis- tribution extending into Florida and Louisiana in
tributed mealybug on pineapple worldwide the United States (Table 43.1). Dysmicoccus bre-
(Williams and Watson 1988). It was thought by vipes has become an increasing threat to pineap-
Ferris (1950) to be of North American origin, ple cultivation in Kerala, West Bengal and Assam
whereas, Carter (1935) considered it native to in India.

Dysmicoccus brevipes D. neobrevipes

M. Mani (*)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 411


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_43
412 M. Mani

Table 43.1 List of mealybugs recorded in pine apple in different countries


Mealybug species Region Reference
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockrell) Several countries Ben-Dov (1994)
India, Indonesia, Philippines Williams(2004)
Dysmicoccus mackenziei Beardsley Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus neobreipes Beardsley Several countries Ben-Dov (1994)
Malaysia Williams (2004)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) Ben-Dov (1994)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) India, Malaysia Williams (2004)
Phenacoccus hargreavesi (Laing) Ethiopian Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus madeirensis Green Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcoides nijalensis (Laing) Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Florida Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus minor Maskell Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel Singapore Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Tozzetti) Ben-Dov (1994)
Trionymus internodii (Hall) Israel Ben-Dov (1994)

43.2 Damage the sweet liquid called honeydew that makes


the pineapple fruit sticky and black coloured
D. brevipes is common on the roots of pineapple from an associated fungus called sooty mould.
and large colonies develop on the stems just In Hawaii, D. brevipes is known to occur in
above ground level. The mealybugs may spread two forms with distinctive body colours and biol-
upwards to feed in the oral cavities, on both ogies, and with different capacities to produce
small and mature fruit, and on the crown leaves. disorders or disease in pineapple plants (Carter
The leaves turn bright pink with some degree of 1936). Pink pineapple mealybug (PPM) D. brevi-
accidity. The leaf tips turn brown, curl down- pes and grey pineapple mealybug D. neobrevipes
ward and the leaf margins show a light inward are the primary vectors of Pineapple Mealybug
curving. Later, these symptoms become more Wilt Associated Virus (PMWaV). On the Cook
pronounced. Ultimately, the plant wilts and dries Islands of Atui and Mangaia, D. brevipes (whose
with downward browning due to necrosis on leaf dissemination is assured by ants, mainly Pheidole
tips. Finally, the leaf tips dry up completely, and megacephala) could seriously affect the develop-
the bright pink turns completely dull. ing pineapple industry. And honeydew secretion
Correspondingly, the roots cease to elongate and by the mealybugs causes a decay of the maturing
collapse. Often, new roots appear above the old fruits. In conclusion, four types of damage are
ones, and, concurrently, the renewed aerial possible on pineapple: (1) the transmission of
growth associated. Sometimes, infected plants pineapple wilt (also called mealybug wilt and
recover from the ailment, and normal new leaves edge-wilt); (2) the production of chlorotic areas
come out at the centre. Mealybugs attack in basal where there has been prolonged feeding and the
portion and in fruit as well (Mandal 2009). The underlying tissues have been exhausted; (3) dam-
plants exhibit stunted appearance and size of age to the bottom of the pineapple by the feeding
fruits are reduced. Mealybugs may cause pine- of large mealybug populations which makes the
apple growers problems because they may impact bottom slices unmarketable and may cause the
the size of pineapple fruit due to withdrawal of rotting and leaking of the fruits; and (4) mealy-
plant nutrients; they produce large volumes of bug stripe which results from the feeding of a
43 Fruit Crops: Pineapple 413

short section of each of 3 or 4 inner whorl leaves. low and by the collapsing of the water storage
It is characterized by streaks of pale green to yel- tissues within these streaks.

Mealybug damage on pineapple

43.3 Behaviour lowering the mealybug populations in pineapple


plantings (Hill 1983).
Pineapple mealybugs are secretive in habit and
usually inhabit the base of their host plants such
as the lower portions of stems and the butts of 43.5 Management
pineapple plants, These sites of attack differ from
that of grey pineapple mealybugs which are nor- Mealybug control often focuses on the control of
mally found on the aerial parts of its hosts such as caretaking ants that are essential for the proper
leaves, stems, aerial roots, and ower and fruit development of pineapple mealybugs. They pro-
clusters. vide the mealybugs for shelter, protection from
predators and parasites, and keep them clean
from detritus that may accumulate in the secreted
43.4 Natural Enemies honeydew and be deleterious to the colony.
Because of the essential role of the ants, manage-
There are many natural enemies known to attack ment practices often include the control of tend-
D. brevipes. Parasites include Aenasius cariocus ing ant species. Without the ants, mealybug
Compere, Aenasius colombiensis Compere, populations are small and slow to invade new
Anagyrus ananatis Gahan, Euryhopauus propin- areas and the eld would be free of a serious
quus Kerrich, Hambletonia pseudococcina mealybug infestation. Three ant species are
Compere and Ptomastidae abnormis (Girault). responsible for maintaining mealybug popula-
Predators include Cryptolaemus montrouzieri tions on pineapple.
Mulsant, Lobodiplosis pseudococci Felt, Nephus Carter (1967) asserted that it is essential to
bilucernarius Mulsant, Scymnus (Pullus) unica- rst control ants in the pineapple elds prior to
tus Sicard and Scymnus pictus Gorham. Although control of pine apple wilt. Ant control relies
many natural enemies to the pineapple mealybug heavily on bait preparations since insecticides are
are present, they exhibit minimal control if pro- used most efciently and selectively in this form
tective ants are tending the mealybug colony. The (McEwen et al. 1979). Insecticidal baits are a
encyrtid Anagyrus ananatis preferred to parasit- common and effective method of controlling
ize adult females of Dysmicoccus brevipes. It is ants. Amdro (hydramethylnon) and insect growth
capable of parasitizing up to 27 mealybugs regulators are the most promising chemicals for
(Gonzlez et al. 2005). It can be found attacking ant control in pineapple (Reimer et al. 1990).
mealybugs in the presence of ants, although its When ants encounter a fence or wall they are
impact on mealybug mortality is low. When ants likely to travel the course of the fence rather than
are absent, the parasitoid is highly effective in up and over the fence to forage on the other side.
414 M. Mani

Physical barriers such as ant fences running par- residual effects. The thick, waxy coating on
allel to the eld periphery are partially successful mealybugs makes insecticide penetration dif-
in keeping ants out of the eld, and subsequently cult. Even the use of systemic insecticides is fre-
controlling mealybug populations. quently impractical for mealybug control.
Pineapple industry, however, still needs an alter-
native for diazinon that can be used on mature
43.6 Cultural Control fruit prior to fruit harvest.
Dipping the basal portion of the planting
Previously infested elds should be turned over material in methyl parathion @ 0.02 to 0.05 % or
and all crop residues removed and burnt. Crop monocrotophos @ 0.02 % as a prophylactic mea-
residues and grass roots left in the eld may har- sure and application of carbofuran 3G @ 15 to 17
bour mealybug populations until the new crop kgha-1 in affected elds or phorate 10G @ 1.75
has developed enough to support a mealybug kgaiha-1 at 100 DAP can effectively control
population. Field borders should be kept clean of pineapple mealybug (Anonymous 2007). It indi-
weeds and debris that may support mealybugs cated that the basal portion of the planting mate-
between plantings. Weeds also provide alterna- rial needed double prophylactic measures
tive food sources that maintain ant populations (phorate 10 G and neem cake ground application
between periods where mealybug infestations are at 100 DAP and 180 DAP respectively), and
small. A common cultural practice is to allow a three times manual weeding helps to protect from
eld to lie fallow for 612 months after post- mealybug infestation (Mandal 2007). According
ratoon knockdown. This period is referred to as to the Pineapple Technical, PNB Krishi
the inter cycle. Shortly before replanting, the Samachar, Punjab National Bank expressed their
eld is burnt to remove pineapple trash. views that BCR in pineapple cultivation may be
1.92 and invest rupee return (IRR) may be more
than 50 % (Anonymous 2007).
43.7 Chemical Control

Granular formulations of commercial products 43.8 Biological Control


30 kg aldicarb/ha, 60 kg thiofanox/ha or 60 kg
carbofuran/ha, gave the best results against Elimination of tending ants from pineapple elds
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Ckll.) (Menezes et al. with the ant bait has led to improved mealybug
1977). Malathion or diazinon is still used for suppression by their natural enemies. In a sense,
direct mealybug control in pineapple, when ant the pineapple industry already uses biological
control does not result in a sufcient reduction in control to manage wilt disease transmitted by
mealybug populations. The chemical control of mealybugs. When ants are controlled through
mealybugs is not easy. Complete coverage of a chemical means, mealybug populations are regu-
pineapple plant with insecticides not possible. lated by the myriad of natural enemies found in
Mealybugs tend to be deep in leaf axils, under the pineapple elds. However, parasites became
sepals of blossoms, or inside of closed blossom established but did not provide adequate control
cups where they are protected from insecticidal of mealybugs particularly in the presence of ants.
sprays (Jahn 1995). According to Hu et al., spray-
ing of quinalphos @ 0.025 %, fenitrothion @
0.05 %, fenthion @ 0.05 %, chlorpyriphos @ 43.9 Hawaii
0.05 %, dimethoate @ 0.05 % or monocrotophos
@ 0.05 % is done carefully so that the chemicals Attempts to establish effective natural enemies of
should reach the base and also the sides of the the pineapple mealybug were conducted over a
plant. Among non-systemic organophosphates, long period but with little success in the early
diazinon provided a minimum of 30 days of years. A number of the species imported speci-
43 Fruit Crops: Pineapple 415

cally against this mealybug did not propagate pseudococcina Comp., were imported from Brazil
readily on the Hawaiian form, nor was establish- in 19351936 and further stocks of the latter spe-
ment secured with a long list of general preda- cies from Venezuela and Colombia. It was found
tors, among which were about 12 species of that the H. pseudococcina from Brazil, which is a
Hyperaspis and 6 species of Scymnus, presum- bisexual race, would not propagate on the
ably well adapted to attack on this mealy bug. Hawaiian D. brevipes, but the stock from
Some minor degree of control was attributable to Venezuela, which reproduces parthenogeneti-
the establishment of the cecidomyiid predator, cally, was well adapted to it. Both of the above
Vincentodiplosis pseudococci (Felt), imported species became established (Carter 1937).
from Mexico in 1930, and to a few of the numer- Anagyrus ananatis Gahan (Hymenoptera:
ous coccinellids that had been imported as gen- Encyrtidae) is the most common solitary, endo-
eral mealybug feeders (Fullaway 1924, 1933; parasitoid of PPM in Hawaii. The parasitoid has
Swezey 1925; Carter 1935; Zimmerman 1948). provided partial control of PPM in association
Mealybug species Pseudococcus bromelias on with other natural enemies. Field parasitization
pineapple was kept down by C. montrouzieri in of PPM by A. ananatis in the presence of ants can
Hawaii (Fullaway 1922). The encyrtid be as high as 9.9 %. It was present in all pineap-
Euryrhopalus schwarzi (How.) (=pretiosa ple elds surveyed and parasitized ant-tended
Timb.) and the cecidomyiid Dicrodiplosis guate- mealybugs (Gonzalez et al. 1999). Because of its
malensis Felt, both imported in 1935 from host specicity, abundance, and persistence, A.
Guatemala, have been reported as established. ananatis was chosen as a candidate for an aug-
Two encyrtid parasites, Anagyrus coccidivorus mentative biological control project targeted
Dozier to A. ananatis Gahan and Hambletonia against PPM (Gonzlez-Hernndez et al. 1999).

Anagyrus ananatis Hambletonia pseudococcina

Mass production of a desired biological agent 14.8 C, they had emergence rates comparable to
is crucial to the implementation of any augmen- the control after 8 weeks, which indicated high
tative biological control program. The ability to survival rates at that temperature.
store reared biological control agents provides an
opportunity to manufacture them during low
demand periods and utilize them during high 43.10 Florida
demand periods. It also permits synchronized
eld releases of natural enemies during the criti- Although D. brevipes was only of very minor sig-
cal stages of pest outbreaks. Anagyrus ananatis nicance on a few small pineapple plantings in
prepupal and pupal stages could be stored for Florida, stocks of Hambletonia pseudococcina
over 6 weeks at 15 C without affecting their Comp. were imported from Puerto Rico in 1943
eclosion rate. When immatures were stored at 1944. The 1943 releases of very small numbers
416 M. Mani

were unsuccessful, but 374 adults released at 43.15 Taiwan and Bonnin Islands
three sites in 1944 resulted in establishment at
Sebring, Florida. C. montrouzieri was imported for the control of
D. brevipes but was only partially successful in
Taiwan and Bonnin Islands (Sakimura 1935).
43.11 Puerto Rico

Anagyrus coccidivorus Doz. and Hambletonia 43.16 Africa


pseudococcina Comp. were received from Brazil,
via Hawaii in 19371938. The rst was propa- The ladybird beetle was introduced into South
gated in the insectary and over 7,000 adults Africa in 1900. Later it became established on
released in the eld. Despite releases continuing other crops but it was not effective against D. bre-
into 1940, there have been no recoveries. vipes on pineapple (Greathead 1971). The preda-
Although only two females of the unisexual race tor was colonized on D. brevipes in pineapple
of Hambletonia pseudococcina were received plantations in West Africa (Mallamaire 1954).
alive, about 7,000 adults were reared and
released. Establishment of H. pseudococcina
occurred readily and eld populations built up 43.17 Virginia
rapidly (Bartlett 1939).
Mass releases of C. montrouzieri were made to
control the heavy infestations of Pseudococcus
43.12 Jamaica comstocki on pineapple in Virginia but the preda-
tor proved ineffective against the mealybug
There have been no reports of establishment of (Haeussler and Clancy 1944).
Hambletonia pseudococcina, Hyperaspis sp.,
and Diomus sp., imported from Hawaii in 1939.
References

43.13 Philippine Islands Anonymous (2007) Pineapple technical, PNB Krishi


Samachar, Punjab National Bank (http://www.pnbkri-
shi.com/index.htm)
The predators Cleodiplosis koebelei (Felt), Bartlett KA (1939) Introduction and colonization of two
Scymnus margipaliens Muls., and Hyperaspis sil- parasites of the pine apple mealybug in Pouerto Rico.
vestrii Weise were all established from Hawaiian P R Univ J Agric 23:6772
Beardsley JW (1964) Notes on the pineapple mealybug
importations in 1931, but reports as to their effec-
complex, with descriptions of two new species
tiveness are not available. In Philippines, C. mon- (Homoptera:Pseudococcidae). Proc Hawaii Entomol
trouzieri was introduced against pineapple Soc XIX(1):5568
mealybug from USA in 1928 but establishment Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
was reported only at one locality (Rao et al. 1971).
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
43.14 Mauritius Carter W (1935) Studies on biological control of
Pseudococcus brevipes (Ckl.) in Jamaica and Central
America. J Econ Entomol 28:10371041
In Mauritius, biological control efforts against D. Carter W (1936) Insects and plant diseases. Hawaii
brevipes centred on C. montrouzieri which was Entomol Soc Proc 9:159170
imported from South Africa during 19361939. Carter W (1937) Importation and laboratory breeding of
two chalcid parasites of Pseudococcus brevipes Ckll.
A total of 1,949 individuals were released in 19
J Econ Entomol 30:37072
sites in 19391940. No eld recoveries were Carter W (1967) Insects and related pests of pineapple in
made (Mamet 1949). Hawaii. Pineapple Research Institute, Honolulu
43 Fruit Crops: Pineapple 417

Ferris GF (1950) Atlas of the Scale Insects of North technology interface, on 2829 December 2007.
America, Series 5: vii-f-278 p Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Kalyani,
Fullaway DT (1922) Insect problems of pineapple indus- Nadia, West Bengal, pp 116
try. Hawaii For Agric Honolulu 19:512 Mandal D (2009) Eco-friendly management of mealybug
Fullaway DT (1924) Insect collecting in Panama. Hawaii and wilt in pineapple. J Plant Protect Sci 1(1):4043
Forest Agric 21:9498 McEwen FO, Beardlsey JW Jr, Hapai M, Su TH
Fullaway DT (1933) Division of entomology. Hawaii (1979) Laboratory test with candi date insecticides
Forest Agric 30:5559 for control of the big-headed ant, Pheidole mega-
Gonzlez HH, Pandey RR, Johnson MW (2005) cephala (Fabricius). Proc Hawaii Entomol Soc
Biological characteristics of adult Anagyrus ananatis 23(1):119123
Gahan (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), a parasitoid of Menezes EB, Suzuchi J, Batista LB, Ismael AJ (1977)
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) (Hemiptera: The use of granular insecticides for the control of the
Pseudococcidae. Biol Control 35:93103 pineapple mealybug, Dysmicoccus brevipes
Gonzlez-Hernndez H, Reimer NJ, Johnson MW (1999) (Cockerell, 1893) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae)
Survey of the natural enemies of the pineapple mealy- [Portuguese]. Anais da Sociedade Entomologica do
bugs (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Biocontrol Brasil 6(2):287294
44:4758 Rao VP, Ghani MA, Sankaran T, Mathur KC (1971) A
Greathead DJ (1971) A review of biological control in the review of the biological control of insects and other
Ethiopian Region. Common Inst Biol Control Tech pests in South East Asia and Pacic region. Common
Common 5, 162 p Inst Biol Tech Control 5, 142 p
Haeussler GJ, Clancy DW (1944) Natural enemies of Reimer NJ, Beardsley JW, Jahn GC (1990) Pest ants in the
comstock mealybug in the eastern states. J Econ Hawaiian Islands. In: Vander Meer RK, Jaffe K,
Entomol 37:503509 Cedena A (eds) Applied myrmecology: a world per-
Hill DS (1983) Dysmicoccus brevipes (Ckll.). In: spective. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 4050
Agricultural insect pests of the tropics and their con- Sakimura K (1935) Transportation of predaceous cocci-
trol, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, nellids from Saipan to Bonin islands and Formosa.
p 214 Kontyu 9:7682
Jahn GC (1995) Gray pineapple mealybugs, Dysmicoccus Swezey OH (1925) Records of introduction of benecial
neobrevipes Beardsley (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), insects in the Hawaiian islands. Hawaii Planters Rec
inside closed pineapple blossom cups. Proc Hawaii 29:369376
Entomol Soc 32:147148 Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Mallamaire A (1954) Les Homopteres nuisibles aux plan- Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN/BHD,
tes, utiles en Afrighe occidentale. S Afr For Sci London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
13:19195 Williams DJ, Watson GW (1988) The scale insects of the
Mamet N (1949) An annotated cataloque of the coccoidea tropical South Pacic region, Part 2, The mealybugs
of Mauritius. Bull Mauritius Inst 3:181 (Pseudococcidae). CAB International, Willingford,
Mandal D (2007) Eco-friendly management of mealybug, 260 p
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell), in Pineapple. In: Zimmerman EC (1948) Insects of Hawaii. V. University
Abstract of national symposium on plant protection of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, 464 p
Fruit Crops: Avocado
44
M. Mani

44.1 Species

The long-tailed mealybug Psudococcus longispinus


(Targioni Tozzetti) had been reported to be injurious
to avocado in South California (Flanders 1940;
1944), Israel (Wysoki et al. 1976), Chile (Sazo et al.
2006), New Zealand (Blumberg and van Driesche
2001; Zulhendria et al. 2012) and also in Los
Angeles. The vine mealybug Planococcus cus, is
also a serious new exotic pest in California known
to attack avocados. Planococcus citri (Risso) was
recorded on avocado in Israel (Dunkelblum et al. Pseudoccocus longispinus on Avocado
2002). Planococcus citri, Maconellicoccus hirsutus
(Green) and Paracoccus marginatus were known to
infest avocado Florida. F. virgata is also known to 44.2 Damage
attack Persea americana (http://www.plantwise.
org/KnowledgeBank/Datasheet. aspx?dsid=23981). Mealybugs suck phloem sap from avocado.
Parcoccus marginatus is known to infest avocado, When abundant, they can reduce tree vigour. The
and so also Nipaecoccus viridis (http://www.plant- infested plants are found with sticky honeydew
wise.org/KnowledgeBank/Datasheet.aspx? and blackish sooty mould that fouls fruit. New
dsid=36335). The mealybugs known to infest scion grafts on old (top-worked) trees have some-
includes Dysmicoccus impararlis sp.n. in India times been damaged by long-tailed mealybugs
(Williams 2004), Ferrisia consobrina Williams & abundant during late winter to early spring. In
Watson, Planococcus citri, Niapecoccus nipae Israel, no damage by Ps. longispinus to avocado
(Makell) in Hawaii, Phenacoccus graminicola was recorded before the 1950s, but since then,
Leonardi and Puto barberi (Cockrell) (Ben-Dov the biological equilibrium appears to have been
1994). upset in plantations near cotton elds, by the
adverse effect on the natural enemies of the
mealybug of chemical treatments applied to
M. Mani (*) cotton. In avocado plantations heavily attacked
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, by the mealybug, the variety Hass was the most
Bangalore 560089, India heavily infested, followed in order of decreasing
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 419


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_44
420 M. Mani

susceptibility by Nabal, Fuerte and Ettinge encyrtids Acerophagus notativentris (Girault),


(Wysoki et al 1977). On grafted avocado trees, Arhopoideus peregrinus (Compere) and
long-tailed mealybugs are an important problem Anarhopus sydneyensis Timberlake are known to
at Los Angeles. In recent years, much grafting parasitize long-tailed mealybug.
has been done in the coastal areas on varieties. Long-tailed mealybugs were at one time seri-
The scions are covered with paper bags to keep ous pests of avocado trees in San Diego County,
the direct sunlight off the tender, new foliage. California but they have generally been ade-
Long-tailed mealybugs were found to establish quately controlled by the parasitoids introduced
on the scions. The shade afforded by these bags to combat them. The parasitoids however, are not
makes it possible for the mealybugs to attack this giving adequate protection for the scions on newly
foliage, and unless they are controlled, the mealy- grafted trees. Although the parasitoids will even-
bugs usually kill the scion. The mealybugs were tually wipe out an infestation of mealybugs, on
found to be just as abundant on the scions of trees grafted trees they do not work sufciently rapidly
which were shaded by parasols as they were on to prevent the destruction of the scions once they
those scions covered by bags. Every spring, ten- are attacked. Therefore insecticides must be relied
der terminal sprouts, in shady portions of avo- upon for control. Insecticidal dusts by a small
cado trees, are attacked by long-tailed mealybugs, hand duster sometime before the foliage appears
but these infestations have not been considered to on the scions. The dust may be applied immedi-
be of practical importance. A similar infestation ately after grafting and before the graft is covered
on the scion of a grafted tree, however, results in with the usual paper bag. It should be applied not
its death. only to the top of the stump, but also 5 or 6 inches
down the sides, especially in the section where the
scion is inserted. The sealing material which is
44.3 Management applied for this purpose forms a bridge over
which the mealybugs and attending ants may gain
Mealybugs are widely distributed in tropical and access to the scion. The stumps of trees which
subtropical regions. They are usually found in have been resealed should again be treated with
cracks and crevices and other sheltered locations insecticides (Walter Ebeling and Pence 1948).
on the fruit surface, and can be difcult to control Regular liberations of C. montrouzieri were
using topical chemical treatments. Conserving the made to reduce the mealybug infestation
natural enemies is advised to control most mealy- (Flanders 1940, 1944). The peak populations of
bug populations. Selectively controlling ants causes P. longispinus occurred in late spring and early
long-tailed mealybug populations to decline and summer; numbers declined in autumn and winter
can prevent outbreaks. Dust on the plants is to be and were usually lowest in April. The integrated
reduced since the dust interferes with natural ene- programme includes the release of Hungariella
mies of the mealybug. Pesticide application is not peregrina (Comp.) (rst introduced into Israel in
advised for mealybugs on avocado. 1954 and the main parasite of Ps. longispinus);
the introduction (from Australia) and establish-
ment of Anagyrus fusciventris (Gir.), another
44.4 Biological Control parasite of the mealybug; and limitating the
sprayings from aircraft near avocado plantations.
Mealybug predators include green lacewing As a result of limiting aerial sprays of cotton near
(Chrysoperla spp.) larvae, pirate bugs, preda- avocado, and the release of natural enemies, the
ceous y larvae, and lady beetles, such as the long-tailed mealybug population and its damage
mealybug destroyer (Cryptolaemus montrouz- were greatly reduced (Swirski et al. 1979, 1980).
ieri). Parasitic wasps are especially important in In Los Angeles, Cryptolaemus beetles are lib-
controlling outbreaks because the wasps special- erated under the paper bags, and immediately try
ize on mealybugs and reproduce rapidly. The to leave the bag without attacking the mealybugs.
44 Fruit Crops: Avocado 421

For some reason they will not stay under the pression and compression are followed by expo-
bags. The parasites, if they should nd the mealy- sure to ethanol vapour under decompression. The
bugs, would not be able to result in their death response of Hass avocado (cv. Hass) to MSDD
rapidly enough to prevent the destruction of the treatment for control of long-tailed mealybug
initial growth of foliage which is so vital to the (Pseudococcus longispinus) was investigated.
development of the scion. The prevention by the The best treatment for the most resistant life stage
parasites of the spread of incipient infestations of (2nd/3rd instars) was 90-min MSDD treatment
mealybugs is sufcient for control as far as the with 371 mg L1 ethanol. Early and late season
avocado tree as a whole is concerned, but on the Hass avocados were subjected to MSDD treat-
newly foliaged scions of grafted trees, prevention ments (with 371 mg L1 ethanol), or in air (con-
or immediate control is desirable. It is necessary, trol). Following the treatments, early season fruit
therefore, to turn to insecticides for the answer to were ripened at 20 and 25 C. Half of the late sea-
this problem. The long-tailed mealybugs appear son fruit were ripened at either 20 or 25 C, and
to the most abundant in late winter and early the remainder were stored at 5.5 C for 6 weeks,
spring, their numbers decreasing as summer then ripened at 20 C. There were no signicant
approaches. This period happens to coincide with difference in quality and rot incidence between
the period of greatest activity in the grafting of non-treated controls and MSDD-treated fruit. The
avocado trees. main disorders found were stem-end and body
rots, vascular browning and esh greying for the
stored fruit. There were also no signicant differ-
44.5 Insecticide Needed ences in fruit respiration rate or ethylene produc-
tion. Thus, MSDD was shown to be a potentially
Since prevention of attacks by the mealybug dur- soft disinfestation treatment for surface pests of
ing the entire late winter early spring period is the avocado (Blumberg and van Driesche 2001).
desired goal, an insecticide with a prolonged
residual effect against the young mealybug crawl-
ers, likely to become established on the grafted References
trees, might logically be, expected to be the solu-
tion to the problem. The insecticide mixtures were Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
applied with a paint brush to the top of the avo-
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
cado stumps and for 3 or 4 inches down the side. ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
It is especially important to apply the insecticides importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
thoroughly to the area around each scion, both on Blumberg D, Van Driesche RG (2001) Encapsulation
rates of three encyrtid parasitoids by three mealybug
top of the stump and down the side. Imidacloprid
species (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) found com-
(Condor Forte 200 SL) applied to the foliage monly as pests in commercial greenhouses. Biol
was efcient in controlling P. longispinus in both Control 22:191199
locations during the 2004 season in Chile. Dunkelblum E, Zada A, Gross S, Fraistat P, Mendel Z
(2002) Sex pheromone and analogs of the citrus
Applications to the trunk were not efcient against
mealybug, Planococcus citri: synthesis and biological
long-tailed mealybugs, apparently due to the activity. Bulletin OILB/SROP 25(9):213220
reduced absorption and translocation in the trees Flanders SK (1940) Biological control of long tail mealy-
at both locations (Sazo et al. 2006). bug on citrus and avocado. Calif Citrogr 25:146
Flanders SE (1944) Control of long tailed mealybug on
avocados by hymenopterous parasites. J Econ Entomol
37:308309
44.6 Quarantine Treatment Sazo L, Pizarro E, Araya JE (2006) Effect of the form of
application of imidacloprid on control of the long-
tailed mealybug Pseudococcus lingispinus (Targioni
Metabolic stress disinfection and disinfestations
& Tozzetti) on avocado and its impact on Neoseiulus
(MSDD) is a potential quarantine treatment in californicus (McGregor) in Chile. Boletin de Sanidad
which a combination of cycles of rapid decom- Vegetal Plagas 32(4):483490
422 M. Mani

Swirski E, Wysoki M, Yizhar J, Gurevitz E, Greenberg S Wysoki M, Izhar I, Swirski E, Gurevitz A, Greenberg S
(1979) The honeydew moth (Cryptoblabes gnidiella) (1976) Damage, host [range] and susceptibility of avo-
and the long-tailed mealybug (Pseudococcus longispi- cado varieties to the long-tailed mealybug
nus) in avocado plantations [Hebrew]. Alon Hanotea (Pseudococcus longispinus Targ. Tozz.)[Hebrew].
34(2):8386 Special Publication, Agricultural Research
Swirski E, Izhar Y, Wysoki M, Gurevitz E, Greenberg S Organization, Israel 65:8190
(1980) Integrated control of the long-tailed mealybug, Wysoki M, Izhar Y, Swirski E, Gurevitz E, Greenberg S
Pseudococcus longispinus (Hom.: Pseudococcidae), (1977) Susceptibility of avocado varieties to the long-
in avocado plantations in Israel. Entomophaga tailed mealybug, Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni
25(4):415426 Tozzetti) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), and a survey of
Walter Ebeling, Pence RJ (1948) Control of the green- its host plants in Israel. Phytoparasitica 5(3):140148
house thrips, long-tailed mealybugs and June Beetles Zulhendria F, Jamiesona LE, Pererab CO, McDonalda
on Avocados. California Avocado Society 1948 RM, Connollya PG, Quekb SY, Woolfa AB (2012)
Yearbook 33:9395 The effect of metabolic stress disinfection and disin-
Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The festation (MSDD) on Hass avocado fruit physiology
Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN/BHD, and mortality of longtailed mealybug (Pseudococcus
London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p longispinus). Postharv Biol Technol 64:138145
Fruit Crops: Banana
45
B. Padmanaban and M.M. Mustaffa

45.1 Species semi-persistent manner by the mealybug,


Planococcus citri. There was severe crop and
Mealybugs are injurious to banana in India, yield loss due to viral disease transmitted by the
Africa, Florida, West Indies, Hawaii and Canary mealybugs (Jones 1994; Lockhart 1994).
Islands etc (Table 45.1). Planococcus cus was able to transmit Banana
streak OL (badna) virus (BSLOV) (Meyer et al.
2008).
45.2 Damage

Arboreal mealybugs are found infesting leaf 45.3 Varietal Susceptibility


sheath and bunches. The mealybugs infest devel-
oping bunches and affects the growth very badly. Highest percent incidence of root mealybugs was
Plannococcus citri and Phenacoccus solenopsis recorded in Wynad District Kerala, India. Among
were found to damage banana cultivars in Tamil the cultivars, Nendran (AAB) was the most sus-
Nadu, India. Geococcus coffeae and Geococcus ceptible but Palayankodan (AAB) and
citrinus are also known to damage to the roots of Kodappanillakunnan (AB) were completely
banana cv. Nendran (AAB) and also Rasthali devoid of root mealybug infestation (Smitha and
(AAB) in Kerala, India. Root mealybug infesta- Maicykutty 2007).
tion leads to symptoms like creamy white discol-
ouration of the last unfurled leaf and the leaf
remaining unopened for longer duration, with a 45.4 Natural Enemies
burnt-like appearance at the tip. The feeder roots
are found to be severely damaged with dead root Anagraphus sp. has been reported as a common
hairs. Mealybugs infest on the root portion and parasitoid of Plannococcus citri infesting banana
affect the absorption of nutrients from the soil. In in India.
India, the banana streak virus is transmitted
mostly through planting materials, but also in a
45.5 Management

B. Padmanaban (*) M.M. Mustaffa The waxy coating of the mealybug creates prob-
ICAR-National Research Centre for Banana, lem in getting desired results on mealy bug
Tiruchirappalli 620 102, India mortality with to insecticides. Therefore, use of
e-mail: bpadmanabannrcb@gmail.com

Springer India 2016 423


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_45
424 B. Padmanaban and M.M. Mustaffa

Table 45.1 List of mealybugs recorded on banana in different countries


Species Region/country Reference
Cataenococcus ensete Williams & Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Cataencoccus larai Williams Columbia, Mexico Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) Taiwan Huang and Chien (1969)
Nigeria Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Dysmicoccus grassii (Leonardi) Southern Asia and Williams (2004)
Canary Islands
Nigeria Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Dysmicoccus lepelleyi (Betrem) Indonesia and Vietnam Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus neobreipes Beardsley Vietnam Williams (2004)
Exallomochlus liti sp.n. Philippines Williams (2004)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) India Williams (2004)
Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Geococcus coffeae Green Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
India Ben-Dov (1994)
Geococcus citrinus Kuwana India Ben-Dov (1994)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) India
Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Neochavesia caldasiae (Balachowsky) Columbia and Trinidad Ben-Dov (1994)
Neochavesia eversi (Beardsley) Columbia Ben-Dov (1994)
Nipaecoccus nipae (Maskell) Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Niapecoccus viridis (Newstead) Vietnam Williams (2004)
Parputo anomalus (Newstead) Tanzania Ben-Dov (1994)
Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Paracoccus burnerae (Brain) Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Paracoccus marginatus Sri Lanka Galanihe et al. (2010)
Williams & Granara de Willink
Phenacoccus parvus Morrison Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) India
Planococcus citri (Risso) India & Florida Ben-Dov (1994)
Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Planococcus cus (Signoret) Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
(continued)
45 Fruit Crops: Banana 425

Table 45.1 (continued)


Species Region/country Reference
Planococcus kraunhiae (Kuwana) California, Taiwan, Ben-Dov (1994)
China & Japan
Planococcus lilacinus (Cockrell) India Williams (2004)
Planococcus minor (Maskell) West Indies Francis et al. (2012)
Philippines Williams (2004)
Planococcus musae sp. nr. Nigeria Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Planococcus musae Matile-Ferreo & Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Williams Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Pseudococcus columbianus Borchsenius Columbia Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus comstocki (Kuwana) Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel Malaysia Williams (2004)
Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Pseudococcus elisae Borchsenius Caribbean region Vargas Calvo and Cubillo Sanchez
of Costa Rica (2010)
Hawaii Beardsley (1986)
Pacic region & Williams (1988)
Southern Asia
Pseudococcus longispinus Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
(Targioni Tozzetti) Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Pseudococcus microadonidum Beardsley Seychlles & Ben-Dov (1994)
Caroline islands
Pseudococcus pergrinabundunus Brchaenius Columbia Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus solomonensis Williams Solomon Islands Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudirhizoecus proximus Green Columbia Ben-Dov (1994)
Rasrococcus iceryoides (Green) India Williams (2004)
Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Rasrococcus invadens Williams Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)
Saccharicoccus sachari (Cockerell) India
Africa Watson and Kubiriba (2005);
Matile-Ferreo and Williams (1995)

second one 15 days before harvest), and that the


biocontrol control agents will be of great use. The
whole tree should be treated. If it is necessary to
ant population present near mealybug colony has
reduce costs, the second application can be made
to be cleared.
to the fruits only (Huang and Chien 1969). The
crop residues infested with mealybugs has to be
Arboreal Mealybugs Spray infested areas with
destroyed. Australian lady bird beetle,
dichlorovas 76 EC @ 2 ml + 2 g of sh oil rosin
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant for the arbo-
soap in a litre of water is to be done for the control
real mealybugs in general, and the hymenopteran
of arboreal mealybugs. Treatment against D. bre-
parasitoid Leptomasitx dactylopii How. specic to
vipes in banana should begin 30 days before har-
P. citri are recommended for their control in India.
vesting, that two applications should be made (the
426 B. Padmanaban and M.M. Mustaffa

mealybugs (Smitha and Maicykutty 2007). In


vitro application of Verticillium lecanii,
Beauveria bassiana (Bals.-Criv.) Vuill. and B.
brongniartii (Saccardo) Petch and Metarhizium
anisopliae (Metchnikoff) Sorokin at single dose
(1 107 conidiospores/ml) against P. citri inicted
mortality of 91.1, 75.5, 66.6 and 45.3 % respec-
tively. Verticillium lecanii at ve doses (ranging
from 1 105 to 1 109 conidiospores/ml) caused
a mortality of 45, 65, 80, 90 and 95 % mortality
respectively (Saranya 2008). Entomopathogenic
P. citri damage
nematode, Steinernema glaseri is also known to
cause mealybug mortality under laboratory
conditions.

Acknowledgement Thanks are due to Mr. R. Govindaraj


JRF for assistance.

References
Beardsley JW (1986) Taxonomic notes on Pseudococcus
elisae Borkhsenius, a mealybug new to the Hawaiian
fauna (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Proc Hawaiian
Entomol Soc 26:3134
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
Ferrisia infestation ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
Francis MA, Kairo WTK, Roda AL, Oscar E, Liburd OE,
Polar P (2012) The passionvine mealybug,
Planococcus minor (Maskell) (Hemiptera:
Pseudococcidae), and its natural enemies in the cocoa
45.6 Root Mealybugs agroecosystem in Trinidad. Biol Control 60:290296
Galanihe LD, Jayasundera MUP, Vithana N,
Asselaarachchi GW, Watson N (2010) Occurrence,
Since suckers are suspected to be the possible distribution and control of papaya mealybug,
source of infestation, spread of this serious pest Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae),
(Geococcus spp.) is to be checked by prevention an invasive alien pest in Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res Ext
13(3):2010
of use of suckers from infested areas within and
Huang T, Chien HS (1969) Chemical control of banana
outside the state. Dipping of suckers in boiled mealybug (Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell)) (VII)
water for 10 s helps to destroy the live stages of [Chinese]. Plant Prot Bull (Taiwan) 11(3):123132
mealybug adhered to the sucker. Soil drenching Jones DR (1994) Risks involved in the transfer of banana
and plantain germplasm. In: Jones DR (ed) The
with chlorpyriphos 20 EC @ 2.5 ml per litre of
improvement and testing of Musa: a global partner-
water in the root zone helps to reduce the root ship. Proceedings of the rst Global conference of the
mealybug population. Sodium silicate was the International Musa testing Program held at FHIA,
best in reducing mealybug population on the Honduras, 2730 April 1994, INIBAP, Montpellier,
France, pp 8596
roots. Drenching of 3 % neem seed kernel extract
Lockhart BEL (1994) Banana streak virus In: Plotez RC,
(NSKE) and Verticillium lecanii (Zimmerman) Gentmeyer GA, Nishijima WT, Rohrbadr KG, Ohr
(Econil 7 g/l) were also effective against root HD (eds) Compendium of tropical fruit diseases.
45 Fruit Crops: Banana 427

American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, -National conference on Banana held at Tiruchirapalli,
Minnesota, USA, pp 1920 2528 October 2007, pp 1819
Matile-Ferreo D, Williams DJ (1995) Recent outbreaks of Vargas Calvo A, Cubillo Sanchez D (2010) Evaluation of
mealybugs on Plantain (Musa sp.) in Nigeria including two modalities of management of the pseudostem
a new record for Africa and a description of a new spe- after the harvest on the growth, production and health
cies of Planococcus Ferris (Homoptera: of banana plants (Musa AAA) [Portuguese].
Pseudococcidae). Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique Agronomia Costarricense 34(2):287297
de France 100:445449 Watson GW, Kubiriba J (2005) Identication of mealy-
Meyer JB, Kasdorf GGF, Nel LH, Pietersen G (2008) bugs (Hemiptera::Pseudococcidae) on banana and
Transmission of activated-episomal Banana streak plantain in Africa. African Entomol 13(1):3547
OL (badna) virus (BSLOV) to cv. banana (Musa Williams DJ (1988) The distribution of the Neotropical
sp.) by three mealybug species. Plant Dis mealybug Pseudococcus elisae Borchsenius in the
92(8):11581163 Pacic region and Southern Asia (Hem.-Hom.,
Saranya C (2008) Evaluation of biocontrol agents against Pseudococcidae). Entomologists Monthly Magazine
Citrus mealy bug, Plannococcus citri. M.Sc. thesis sub- 124:123124
mitted to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirapalli, India Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Smitha MS, Maicykutty PM (2007) Root mealybug a Natural History Museum, Southdene Sdn. Bhd., Kuala
new pest problem on banana in Kerala. Abstracts Lumpur, 896 p
Fruit Crops: Sapota
46
M. Mani

46.1 Species tion on sapota was attributed to the predatory


activity of C. montrouzieri (Mani and
Mealybugs are found injurious to Krishnamoorthy 2008).
sapota (Manilkara zapota (Forberg)/Acharas
zapota) in India, Florida, Indonesia, Philippines,
Malaysia, Cambodia, Singapore, Vietnam and 46.3.2 Rastrococcus invadens
some West African countries (Table 46.1).
The mealybug R. invadens was recorded in seri-
ous form on sapota in May 2002 in Bangalore
46.2 Damage North, India. The coccinellid predator
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant was released
Sapota leaves are found infested with against R. invadens on sapota. The population of
Rastrococcus invadens. Fruits were found cov- the mealybug declined from 507.6/shoot to 0.0 in
ered with P. lilacinus. Shoots with leaves are mal- 2 months time. The decline in the mealybug
formed due to M hirsutus. Both leaves and fruits population on sapota was due to the predatory
are found damaged by P. citri. activity of C. montrouzieri (Mani et al. 2004).

46.3 Management 46.3.3 Planococcus citri

46.3.1 Maconellicoccus hirsutus The two encyrtid parasitoids Coccidoxenoides


perminutus (Timberlake) and Leptomastix dacty-
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri is found useful to lopii How. are useful in the suppression of P. citri
control M. hirsutus on sapota when released @ on sapota in India. In a sapota orchard located in
20/plant on sapota plants infested with mealy- Bangalore North, the mealybug infestation was
bugs. The mealybug population declined from noticed in the rst week of January on 3-year-old
54.20/plant on April 23 to 1.50/plant on June sapota at the Indian Institute of Horticultural
15 in 2003. The decline in the mealybug popula- Research Farm, Bangalore North. The mean
number of mealybugs per shoot was 82.50, and
M. Mani (*) the activity of the encyrtid parasitoids was
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, observed from 9th January to 20th February. A
Bangalore 560089, India mean maximum of 36.41 parasitoids emerged
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 429


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_46
430 M. Mani

Table 46.1 List of mealybugs recorded on sapota in different countries


Mealybug species Region/country Reference
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockrell) India Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus lepelleyi (Betrem) Indonesia Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus neobreipes Beardsley Philippines Williams (2004)
Exallomochlus hispidus (Morrison) Malaysia Williams (2004)
Exallomochlus philippinensis sp.n. Philippines Williams (2004)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) India Williams (2004)
Formicoccus matileae sp.n. Cambodia Williams (2004)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) Philippines Williams (2004)
Florida Hodges et al. (2005)
India Mani and Krishnamoorthy (2008)
Paracoccus marginatus Williams and India
Granara de Willink
Planococcus citri (Risso) India Mani and Krishnamoorthy (1997)
Planococcus lilacinus (Cockrell) India Williams (2004); Dhara Jothi and
Tandon (1991)
Planococcus minor Maskell Indonesia & Vietnam Williams (2004)
Rasrococcus iceryoides (Green) India & Singapore Williams (2004)
Rastrococcus invadens Williams India Mani et al. (2004)
West African countries Agounke et al. (1988)

from samples collected on 15th January. The cor- collected on 3rd March revealed the presence of
relation and regression analysis indicated a the exotic encyrtid parasitoid, Leptomastix dacty-
highly signicant relationship (r = 0.958) between lopii How. The parasitoid was found to be active
P. Citri (Y) and the parasitoid C. perminutus. The up to the rst week of April, 1996. The mealybug
regression equation tted with the mealybug population of 112.41 observed on 11th March
population (Y) and the parasitoid (X1) was: had declined to 2.16 on 4th April. Statistical anal-
Y = 20.5092 + 0.3912 X1. Abiotic factors (except ysis revealed that the parasitoid, L. dactylopii had
the minimum temperature) did not have any sig- a highly signicant relationship with the popula-
nicant relationship with P. citri. The decline in tion of P. citri (r = 0.969) during March-April.
the mealybug population from 156.4 in January The regression equation tted with the mealybug
to 2.05 in February 1996 attributed due to the population (Y) and the parasitoid (XI) was:
activity of the parasitoid C. perminutus (Mani Y = 7.56555 + 0.7644 XI. The relationship of the
and Krishnamoorthy 1997). mealybug population with any of the weather
In yet another orchard at llHR Farm, Bangalore parameters was not signicant. Hence, the reduc-
North, Planococcus citri was observed in the rst tion in the mealybug population during March
week of March, 96 on sapota. A mean of 94.37 April may be due to the activity of L. dactylopii
mealy bugs per shoot was observed. The samples (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 1997).
46 Fruit Crops: Sapota 431

R. invadens damage on sapota P. lilacinus on sapota

46.3.4 Planococcus lilacinus Hodges AC, Hodges GS, Wisler GC (2005) Exotic scale
insects (Hemiptera: coccoidea) and whiteies
(Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Florida tropical fruits; an
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri is highly effective in example of vital role early detection in pest prevention
reducing the populations of P. lilacinus and also and management. Proc Fla State Hortic Soc
the above other mealybug species on sapota. 118:215217
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1997) Suppression of
Planococcus citri (Risso). Pest Manage Hortic Ecosyst
3(1):4547
References Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (2008) Field efcacy of
Australian ladybird beetle Cryptolaemus montrouzieri
Agounke D, Agricola U, Bokonon-Ganta HA (1988) Mulsant in the suppression of Maconellicoccus hirsu-
Rastrococcus invadens Williams (Hemiptera, tus (Green) on sapota. J Biol Control 22:471473
Pseudococcidae), a serious exotic pest of fruit trees Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A, Pattar GL (2004) Efcacy of
and other plants in West Africa. Bull Entomol Res Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant in the suppres-
78:695702 sion of Rastrococcus invadens Williams on sapota.
Dhara Jothi B, Tandon PL (1991) Present status of sapota J Biol Control 18:203204
pests in Karnataka. Paper presented at National semi- Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
nar optimization of productivity and utilization of Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN/BHD,
sapota held at Navasari, India, 18 October 1991 London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Fruit Crops: Pomegranate
47
M. Mani

47.1 Species fruits, resulting in yellowing of leaves and shed-


ding of owers and tender fruits. Fruits covered
Mealybugs are injurious to pomegranate in India, with the mealybugs lose their market value. Fruit
Sri Lanka, South Africa, Florida, Iran, Palestine, infestation with the mealybugs ranged from 25 to
Israel, and USSR, etc (Table 47.1). 100 % with a mean of 56.55 % in South India
(PDBC-ICAR 1994; Karuppuchamy 1994).
Bagging of pomegranate fruits for the control of
47.2 Damage fruit borers had increased mealybug infestation
(N. viridis) (Shevale and Kulgud 1998).
Both nymphs and adult female mealybugs caused
considerable damage to the pomegranate by
sucking the sap from the leaves, owers and

Flower damage by M.hirsutus Fruit damage by P.lilacinus Cryptolaemus feeding


on M. hirsutus

M. Mani (*)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 433


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_47
434 M. Mani

Table 47.1 List of mealybugs recorded on pomegranate in different regions of the world
Mealybug species Region/Country Reference
Crisicoccus theobromae Malaysia Williams (2004)
Williams & Watson
Dysmicoccus grassii Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
(Leonardi)
Dysmicoccus neobreipes Thailand Williams (2004)
Beardsley
Ferrisia consobrina (Ckll.) India Williams (2004); Mani and Krishnamoorthy (1996)
Ferrisia virgata (Ckll.) India Nayar et al. (1976); Karuppuchamy (1994)
Pakistan Williams (2004)
Heliococcus destructor Palaearctic region Ben-Dov (1994)
Borchsenius
Maconellicoccus hirsutus India Mani and Krishnamoorthy (1991)
(Green) Maldives Williams (2004)
Nipaecoccus viridis India Mani and Krishnamoorthy (1990)
(Newstead)
Paracoccus ferrisi Ezzat & Mexico Ben-Dov (1994)
McConnel
Paracoccus marginatus Sri Lanka Galanihe et al. (2010)
Williams and Granara de Florida Walker et al. (2003)
Willink
Peliococcus trsipinosus Kenya Ben-Dov (1994)
(James)
Phenacoccus solenopsis
Tinsley
Planococcus citri (Risso) Soviet Union Niyazov (1969)
Iran Bodenheimer (1944)
Palestine Rivnay (1945)
Israel Rivnay (1960)
USSR Niyazov (1969)
Egypt EL-Rahn et al. (1974)
India Mani and Krishnamoorthy (1991, 2000)
Florida Hodges et al. (2005)
Planococcus dorsopinosus Philippines, India, Williams (2004)
Ezzat & Mc Connel Thailand
Planococcus lilacinus India Mani and Krishnamoorthy (1990); Ananda (2007); Balikai
(Ckll.) (2000)
India Tanwar et al. (2010)
Pseudococcus comsocki Ben-Dov (1994)
(Kuwana)
Pseudococcus cryptus India Williams (2004)
Hempel
Pseudococcus lamentosus France Frappa (1931)
Ckll.
Pseudococcus longispinus Africa Moawad et al. (2011); Wohlfarter et al. (2010)
(Targioni Tozzetti), Ps.
maritimus & Pl. citri
Pseudococcus comstocki Uzbekistan Sheffer (1974)
(Kuw.)
Pseudococcus maritimus http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/les/datastore/391-534.pdf
(Ehrhorn)
47 Fruit Crops: Pomegranate 435

47.3 Seasonal Development methoxam, dimethoate, dichlorvos + Fish Oil


Rosin Soap (FORS), dimethoate + FORS
The incidence of mealybugs was more from recorded signicantly higher per cent reduction
March onwards and gradually reached to a peak of mealybug population and nally afforded
with 11.33 per 30 cm shoot per plant during sec- 71.97, 69.24, 72.74, 70.76 and 73.37 % reduc-
ond fortnight of April in North Karnataka. From tion over untreated control. But at the end of 14
June onwards, there was gradual decline in days after treatment (DAT), all insecticides were
mealybug population (Ananda 2007). Morning inferior to the treatment which received 10 grubs
relative humidity recorded signicant and posi- of Australian ladybird beetle Cryptolaemus
tive (r = 0.5956) relationship, while evening rela- montrouzieri Mulsant recorded signicantly
tive humidity recorded negative and signicant higher per cent reduction (94.09) of mealybugs.
relationship (r = 0.57499) with incidence of Among all treatments, dimethoate + FORS
mealybug Pl. lilacinus infesting on pomegranate recorded higher (73.37) per cent reduction of
in Karnataka, India. Both maximum and mini- mealybugs over untreated control. Dimethoate
mum temperatures had positive and was next best treatment which recorded 72.48 %
non-signicant (r = 0.3750, r = 0.1872), relation- reduction of mealybugs over untreated control
ship with mealy bugs, but rainfall and number of (Ananda 2007).
rainy days had negative and non-signicant rela- Bufrofezin can be recommended for use
tionship. Among all regression factors listed, against Pseudococcus maritimus on pomegran-
only morning and evening relative humidity were ates. Lannate is effective, but a single spray will
found to exert signicant inuence on incidence only control the part of the population moving
of mealy bug; their inuence differed signi- between the bark and the fruit, which is never
cantly when considered individually. Among the more than half. The mealybugs hidden between
above factors morning and evening relative fruit or inside the ower end are protected from
humidity inuenced to the tune of 35 and 33 %, the spray. Materials with better residual action
respectively (Ananda 2007). Mani and are to be registered in pomegranates (Carroll
Krishnamoorthy (1990), Karuppuchamy (1994) et al. 2006).
and Shevale and Kulgud (1998) also reported
incidence of mealybug Ferrisia spp. more abun- Biological Control Biological control is effec-
dant during March to June which is also a fruiting tive unless disrupted by ants and insecticidal
period. application. Cryptolaemus montrouzieri supple-
ments other local natural enemies in clearing the
mealybug species on pomegranate in India (Mani
47.4 Management and Krishnamoorthy 1990; Ananda et al. 2009).

Cultural Collection and destruction of the


infested twigs and leaves and burying them; 47.4.1 Planococcus lilacinus (Ckll.)
Removal of the plants which serve as alternate
hosts for the mealy bugs. Spalgis epeus Westwood, Hyperaspis maindronii
Sic., Scymnus severini Weise. Eublemma sp.,
Chemical Phosphamidon (0.03 %), monocro- Leucopis lutecornis Malloch and Anagyrus sp.,
tophos (0.1 %), malathion (0.04 %) and dimeth- Triommata coccidivora (Felt.), Spalgis epeus
oate (0.03 %) gave effective control of F. virgata Westwood, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls.
(Butani, 1976). According to Ananda (2007), 3 Scymnus coccivora Ayyar and Cacoxenus per-
and 7 days after treatment imidacloprid, thia- spicaux (Knab) were reared from P. lilacinus.
436 M. Mani

Only S. epeus and Cryptolaemus montrouzieri 47.4.2 Planococcus citri


were found very efcient in clearing the mealy-
bug populations (Nair 1975; Mani and Leptomastix dactylopii How. and
Krishnamoorthy 1990; Mani 1995). Coccidoxenoides perminutus (Timberlake) were
The encyrtid parasitoid Tetracnemoidea found to be effective in suppressing the popula-
indica (Ayyar) played a signicant role in reduc- tions of P. citri on pomegranate (Mani and
ing the mealybug population on pomegranate in Krishnamoorthy 2000). In a pomegranate
India (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 2000). The orchard at Bangalore North, initial samples col-
mealybug P. lilacinus was observed in the last lected on 1st June 1996 yielded the two encyrtid
week of June and the number of mealybugs per parasitoids (i.e.) Leptomastix dactylopii How.
plant (four shoots) was 180.30 at that time. The and Coccidoxenoides perminutus but in small
initial sampling had yielded large number of the numbers. At that time, mean number of mealy-
encyrtid T. indica. A mean maximum of 90.20 bugs per plant (four shoots) was 1,280.50. C.
adults of T. indica was recovered from the sam- perminutus was always found to emerge in large
ples collected on 25th June, 1997. The parasitoid numbers than L. dactylopii from all the samples
was found to be active up to the last week of Aug. collected during the study period. A mean maxi-
The population of P. lilacinus had gradually mum of 92.10 adults of C. perminutus had
declined from 180.30 on 25th June to 4.50 on emerged from the samples collected on 21st
22nd August 1997. March 1996. In the case of L. dactylopii, a mean
In yet another pomegranate orchard at maximum of 21.10 adults were recovered from
Bangalore North, P. lilacinus was rst noticed in the samples collected on 15th March. Both the
August, 1991. The mealybug population per- parasitoids were active up to the end of March
sisted for about four months. The decrease in 1996. Only the drosophilid predator Cacoxenus
mealybug population was attributed mainly to perspicax (Knab) was collected in very negligi-
the action of Spalgis epeus Westwood and C. ble numbers. Due to build up of parasitoids espe-
montrouzieri to certain extent. Triommata coc- cially C. perminutus, the population of P. citri
cidivora (Felt) was also observed in smaller num- had declined from 128.50 on 1st March to 8.10
bers throughout the study (Mani 1995). on 3rd April, 1996. The mealybug ceased to a
According to Ananda (2007), the treatment problem from April 1996 onwards. Though L.
which received 10 grubs of C. montrouzieri dactylopii and C. perminutus were found
recorded signicantly higher per cent reduction together, the latter one played a dominant role in
(94.09) of mealybug P. lilacinus in India. suppressing P. citri on pomegranate.

Coccidoxenoides perminutus Leptomastix dactylopii Parasitized mealybug


47 Fruit Crops: Pomegranate 437

In the Soviet Union, the main parasitoid of P. 47.5 Use of Verticillium lecanii
citri is Anagyrus pseudococci (Gir.), which
occurs in the south of European Russia and in Verticillium lecanii is known to infect the mealy-
Soviet Central Asia and which destroys up to 75 bugs infesting pomegranate in India. It is a cos-
% of the coccid population in areas not treated mopolitan fungus on insects. V. lecanii is known
with insecticides (Niyazov 1969). as white- halo fungus because of the white
mycelial growth on the edges of infested insects.
The conidia (spores) of V. lecanii are slimy and
47.4.3 Maconellicoccus hirsutus attach to the cuticle of insects. The fungus infects
insects by producing hyphae from germinating
Releases of the predator C. montrouzieri were spores that penetrate insect integument, and the
found to be very effective in controlling M. hirsu- fungus then destroys the internal contents and
tus on pomegranate in India (Mani and insects die. Treatments were imposed after the
Krishnamoorthy 1991). initiation of sufcient infestation of mealybug in
nymphal stage. It is seen from Table 4.1 that, all
the doses of V. lecanii i.e. 26 g/l of water effec-
47.4.4 Ferrisia virgata tively checked the built-up of mealybug popula-
tion up to 10 days after application and these
Scymnus coccivora and C. montrouzieri were treatments were found signicantly superior over
found to reduce the population of F. virgata in the untreated control at 3,7 and 10 days after
Tamil Nadu, India (Karuppuchamy 1994). application. All the V. lecanii treatments could
not cause mortality of the pest at 2 days after
application. The pest mortality was less (22.61
47.4.5 Pseudococcus maritimus 43.28 %) at 3 days after application than that
(39.3284.28 %) was observed at 7 days after
Mealybug biocontrol consists mainly of two application. It indicated that V. lecanii acts slow
kinds of parasitoids on Pseudococcus maritimus. initially and required at least 3 days to cause
The encyrtid parasitoids that help control mealy- lethal effect. On the basis of effectiveness of V.
bugs in grapes are also effective in pomegran- lecanii 4 g/l of water seemed to be optimum for
ates. Ladybird beetles with larvae similar in the effective management of mealybugs on
appearance to Cryptolaemus have been observed. pomegranate (Kulkarni et al. 2007). Effectiveness
The smaller encyrtid parasitoids rst appear of V. lecanii conidia and ltrates against
under the bark in the rst mealybug generation. Planococcus citri in vitro was reported by
There are probably ve parasitoid generations for Gonzalez et al. (1995).
each mealybug generation, as in grapes. The last
parasitoid generation occurs in mealybugs which
have already deposited half of an egg mass. The References
second encyrtid generation begins by parasitizing
crawlers under the bark and on the leaves, includ- Ananda N (2007) Seasonal incidence and management of
sucking pests of pomegranate. M.Sc. thesis submitted
ing those protected by the Dictyna spider webs.
to the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad,
The larger parasite typically attacks large mealy- 59 p
bugs under the bark, so it appears late in each Ananda N, Kotikal YK, Balikai RA (2009) Management
generation. Biological control is effective unless practices for major sucking pests of pomegranate.
Karnataka J Agric Sci 22:790795
disrupted by Lannate or by ants (Devin et al.
Balikai RA (2000) Status of pomegranate pests in
2006). Karnataka. Pest Manage Hortic Ecosyst 6(1):6566
438 M. Mani

Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1991) Maconellicoccus hir-
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: sutus on pomegranate. Entomon 16:103
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1996) Mealybug in pome-
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic granate.The Hindu, 13 June 1996, p 28
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (2000) Biological suppres-
Bodenheimer FS (1944) Notes on the coccoidea of Iran sion of mealybugs Planococcus citri (Risso) and
with descriptions of new species of Planococcus Planococcus lilacinus (CK11) on pomegranate in
(Hemiptera: Homoptera). Bull Soc Fouad Ier Ent India. Indian J Plant Prot 28(2):187189
28:85100 Moawad SS, Hassan SA, Al-Barty AM (2011)
Carroll D, Puget B, Higbee B, Quist M, Magallenes O, Enumeration and estimation of insect attack fruits of
Smith N, Gjerde A, Schneider K (2006) Pomegranate some cultivars of Punica granatum. Afr J Biotechnol
pest management in the San Joaquin Valley. http:// 10(19):38803887
ucce.ucdavis.edu/les/datastore/391-534.pdf Nair MRGK (1975) Insects and mites of crops in India.
EL-Rahn WAA, Salam MA, Wahab AA, Kedr H (1974) ICAR, New Delhi, 185 p
Evaluation of insecticides for the control of pomegran- Nayar KK, Ananthakrishnan TN, David BV (1976)
ate buttery and citrus mealybug and their effects on General and applied entomology. Tata McGraw-Hill
physical and chemical characteristics. Indian J Agric Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, 589 p
Sci 44:862865 Niyazov OD (1969) The parasites and predators of grape
Frappa C (1931) Sur la presence a Madagascar de mealybug [Russian]. Zashchita Rastenii
Pseudococcus lamentosus Ckll. Cochenillenuisible 14(11):3840
aux Caers. Rev Path Veg Entomol Agric PDBC-ICAR (1994) Annual report of project directorate
17:305311 of biological control for 199394, Bangalore, India,
Galanihe LD, Jayasundera MUP, VithanaN GW, Watson 281 p
N (2010) Occurrence, distribution and control of Rivnay E (1945) Notes on encyrtidae from Palestine with
papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: description of a new species. J Entomol Soc Sthn
Pseudococcidae), an invasive alien pest in Sri Lanka. Agric 8:117122
Trop Agric Res Ext 13(3):710 Rivnay E (1960) Notes on the parasites of Planococcus
Gonzalez E, Martinez MA, Delos L, Martinez B (1995) citri in Israel. Ktavim 10:223224
Effectiveness in vitroculture of Verticilliutn lecanii Sheffer VV (1974) The destruction of Comstocks mealy-
against Planococcus citri. Revista de protection vegeta bug [Russian]. Zaschita Rastenii 5:43
10(3):265268 Shevale BS, Kulgud SN (1998) Population dynamics pest
Hodges AC, Hodges GS, Wisler GC (2005) Exotic scale of pomegranate Punica granatum Linnaeus. In:
insects (Hemiptera: coccoidea and whiteies Proceedings of rst national symposium on pest man-
(Hemiptera:Aleyrodidae) in Florida tropical fruits; An agement in horticultural crops, IIHR, Bangalore,
example of vital role early detection in pest prevention and pp 4751
management. Proc Fla State Hortic Soc 118:215217 Tanwar RK, Jeyakumar P, Vennila S. (2010) Papaya
Karuppuchamy P (1994) Studies on the management of mealybug and its management strategies, Technical
pests of pomegranate with special reference to fruit Bulletin 22, National Centre for Integrated Pest
borer, Virachola isocrates (Fabr.). Ph.D. thesis, TNAU, Management, New Delhi, 22 p.
Coimbatore, India Walker A, Hoy M, Meyerdirk DE (2003) Papaya
Kulkarni SR, Kadam JR, Chavan AP (2007) Preliminary Mealybug. University of Florida Featured
studies on the efcacy of Verticillium lecanii Creatures. http://creatures.ifas.ufl.edu/fruit/mealy-
(Zimmermann) against mixed populations of mealy bugs/papa
bugs. Pest Manag Hortic Ecosyst 13(I):6364 Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Mani M (1995) Studies on the natural enemies of oriental Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
mealybug Planococcus lilacinus (Ckll.) London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
(Homoptera:Pseudococcidae) in India. J Entomol Res Wohlfarter M, Giliomee JH, Venter E (2010) A survey of
19:6170 the arthropod pests associated with commercial pome-
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1990) Outbreak of mealy- granates, Punica granatum (Lythraceae), in South
bugs and record of their natural enemies on pomegran- Africa. Afr Entomol 18(1):192199
ate. J Biol Control 4:6162
Fruit Crops: Ber
48
M. Mani

48.1 Species ber and quality of fruits (Butani 1973). The infes-
tation with M. hirsutus on the growing point has
Mealybugs are injurious to ber (Zizyphus mauri- led to the malformation of shoots and leaves at
tiana L.) in India, Egypt, and Jordan etc (Table Bijapur in India. On an average, there were 80.6
48.1). colonies per plant, each colony having 17.8 indi-
viduals. On an average, there were 80.6 colonies
per plant, each colony having 17.8 individuals.
48.2 Damage Similarly 15.4 egg masses covered with white
waxy mealy matter were observed per plant.
In recent years, mealybugs have become an Based on the market price of infested and healthy
increasing threat to the cultivation of ber in penin- fruits, there was a net monetary loss of Rs. 25,800/
sular India. Mealybugs become serious pests in ha accounting for 33.33 % loss due to mealybug
Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil infestation (Balikai and Bagali 2000). The orien-
Nadu and Gujarat in India. Severe infestation of tal mealybug Planococcus lilacinus appeared in
mealybugs and subsequent development of sooty serious form on ber in 1990 and 1991 in Bangalore
mould affect the growth and fruiting capacity of North (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 1996).

M. hirsutus on Ber N. viridis on Ber Ovisac of N. viridis opened


revealing pink eggs

M. Mani (*)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 439


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_48
440 M. Mani

Table 48.1 List of mealybugs recorded on ber in different countries


Species Country Reference
Cataencoccus mazoensis (Hall) Zimbabwe Ben-Dov (1994)
Cococcidohystrix (Centrococcus) insolitus (Green) India Williams (2004)
Crisicoccus hirsutus (Newstead) India Williams (2004)
Ferrisia virgata (Ckll) Ben-Dov (1994)
Heliococcus ziziphi Borchenius China Ben-Dov (1994)
Maconellicoccus (=Phenacoccus) hirsutus (Green) Egypt Hall (1926)
India Mani (1993); Patil et al. (1996);
Mani et al. (2007)
Pakistan Williams (2004)
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) Jordan Meyerdirk et al. (1988)
India Shah et al. (1981); Mani (1993)
Pakistan Williams (2004)
Iraq EL Haidari et al. (1976)
Niapecoccus lamentosus (Cockrell) Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus citri (Risso) India Mani (1993)
Planococcus lilacinus (Ckll.) India Tandon and Verghese (1987);
Mani (1993); Mani et al.(2007)
Pseudococcus sp. U.K. Barnes (1935)
Pseudococcus hibisci Hall Egypt Hall (1921)

48.3 Natural Enemies oid Aprostocetus purpureus (Cam.) and the


lycaenid predator S. epeus were also recorded
The parasitoids namely Angyrus dactylopii on P. lilacinus (Mani 1993).
(How.), Anagyrus mirzai Agarwal, Alamella
flava Agarwal, Gyranusoidea flava Shaffee
et al., Coccophagus sp., Chartocerus sp. and 48.4 Management
the predators A. dactylopii (How.), A. mirzai
Agarwal, Alamella flava Agarwal, The mealybugs on ber are difcult to control with
Gyranusoidea flava Shaffee et al., insecticides. On the other hand, they are more
Coccophagus sp., Chartocerus sp. and three amenable for biological control by parasitoids
predators were recorded on N. viridis infesting and predators. The mealybugs on ber were kept
ber in India. Among them, Anagyrus spp. and under check by a complex of natural enemies in
Spalgis epeus are of considerable importance. Iraq (EL Haidari et al. 1976). Releases of C. mon-
Two parasitoids Coccidoxenoides perminutus trouzieri supplement the local natural enemies in
(Timberlake) and Allotropa sp. and the preda- controlling all the four mealybug species on ber
tor Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant) were in India (Mani 1993; Mani and Krishnamoorthy
recorded on P. citri infesting ber. The parasit- 1996; Mani et al. 2007).
48 Fruit Crops: Ber 441

Chartocerus sp. Anagyrus indicus

48.4.1 N. viridis natural enemy except C. montrouzieri was


observed on M. hirsutus. There was no signi-
Infestation on N. viridis was noticed in August in cant inuence of abiotic factors on the mealybug
Bangalore North on 12-year-old trees of the vari- population during the study period. The decline
ety Umran. Mean mealybug population was in the mealybug population on ber was attributed
128.5 prior to the suspension of insecticidal due to the predatory activity of C. montrouzieri
sprays and release of the predator C. montrouz- (Mani et al. 2007).
ieri. The activity of the predator was observed
throughout the study. Grubs were seen feeding
on N. viridis 15 days after release and a maxi- 48.4.3 Planococcus citri
mum population of 4.5 grubs per sample was
observed 45 days after release. The population of Planococcus citri was observed on ber plants in
the local natural enemies especially Anagyrus December 1990 in Bangalore North. The mealy-
spp. started building up attacking N. viridis heav- bug population ranged from 186 to 263 with a
ily. By the rst week of October, the mealybug mean of 242.5 per sample. Initial samples
population declined to very low level and subse- revealed the absence of L. dactylopii but C. per-
quently the pest disappeared (Mani 1993). In minutus and C. montrouzieri were observed in
Jordan, Anagyrus indicus Shaffee et al. was intro- December. The activity of L. dactylopii was seen
duced to suppress the mealybug N. viridis on only a month after the release, and continued up
Zizyphus sp. (Meyerdirk et al. 1988). to the end of February 1991. The local parasitoid
C. perminutus had emerged in large numbers,
and a maximum of 40.3 per sample was observed
48.4.2 Macinellicoccus hirsutus in the second week of February. C. perminutus
rather than L. dactylopii was mainly responsible
Following the appearance of the pink mealybug for the control of P. citri (Mani 1993).
M. hirsutus, the coccinellid predator
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. was also
observed along with the mealybugs on ber in 48.4.4 Planococcus lilacinus
India. There was reduction in the population of
the mealybug from 62.50/plant on January 1, The parasitoid Aprostocetus purpureus (Cam.)
2002 to 0.85/plant on January 21, 2002. No other and the lycaenid predator S. epeus were recorded
442 M. Mani

on P. lilacinus (Mani 1993). There was reduction Hall WJ (1921) The Hibiscus mealybug Pseudococcus
hibisci (Hemip.). Bull Soc En dEgypt Cairo,
in numbers of P. lilacinus from 45.40/shoot in
XIV:1729
December 1994 to 0.40/shoot in rst week of Hall WJ (1926) The Hibiscus mealybug, (Phenacoccus
January 1995 due to the predation of S. epius in hirsutus Green) in Egypt in 1925 with notes on the
Karnataka (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 1996). introduction of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls.
Minist Agric Egypt Bull 7, 15 p
Mani M (1993) Studies on mealybug and their natural
enemies in ber orchards. J Biol Control 7:7580
References Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1996) Biological suppres-
sion of oriental mealybug Planococcus lilacinus on
Balikai RA, Bagali AN (2000) Population density of ber. Pest Manage Hortic Ecosyst 2:4950
mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) on ber Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A, Pattar GL (2007) Suppression
(Zizyphus mauritiana) and economic losses. Agric Sci of pink mealybug (Maconellicoccus hirsutus) on ber
Dig 20(1):6263 (Zizyphus mauritiana). Indian J Agric Sci 77(2):135
Barnes HF (1935) Some new coccids causing gall Meyerdirk DE, Khasimuddin S, Bashir M (1988)
(Cecidomyidae). Bull Entomol Res 26:525530 Importation, colonisation and establishment of
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- Anagyrus indicus (Hym.: Encyrtidae) on Nipaecoccus
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: viridis (Horn.: Pesudococcidae) in Jordan.
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- Entomophaga 33:229237
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic Patil P, Patil BV, Patil PV (1996) Insect pests of ber in
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p North Karnataka. South Indian Hortic 44:113
Butani DK (1973) Insect pests of fruit crops and their con- Shah AM, Patel CB, Patel VJ (1981) Ber, a new host
trol. Pesticides 7:3335 record of mealybug Nipaecoccus vastator (Mask.) in
EL Haidari HS, Aziz FI, Whahab WA (1976) Activity of Gujarat. Indian J Entomol 43:453454
predators and parasites of the mealybug, Nipaecoccus Tandon PL, Verghese A (1987) New insect pests of certain
vastator (Maskell) in Iraq. Yearbook of pl. Prot Res fruit crops. Indian J Hortic 44:121122
Iraq for 197476, pp 4146 Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Natural History Museum, Southdene Sdn. Bhd., Kaula
Lumpur, 896 p
Fruit Crops: Custard Apple
49
M. Mani

49.1 Species 49.2 Damage

Mealybugs are highly injurious to custard apple Fruits are completely covered with mealy-
(Annona spp.) in India (Mani and Krishnamoorthy bugs. When the population explodes, the
1989). Murray (1982) reported high level of infes- mealybugs are seen on the trunk and leaves
tation with P. citri on custard apple trees in but rarely. They cover the entire fruit reducing
Australia. In Caribbean islands, both Annona squa- the market value. Severe mealybug infestation
mosa and A. muricata were found severely infested causes heavy economic losses (Mani and
with M. hirsutus (Kairo et al. 2000) (Table 49.1). Krishnamoorthy 1989 ).

Fruit damage by F. virgata Fruit damage by P. citri Fruit damage by M. hirsutus

M. Mani (*)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 443


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_49
444 M. Mani

Table 49.1 List of mealybugs recorded on custard apple in different countries


Mealybug species Region/country Reference
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockrell) Thailand Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus grassii (Leonardi) Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus lepelleyi (Betrem) Indonesia & Malaysia Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus neobreipes Beardsley India, Philippines & Vietnam Williams (2004)
Hawaii
Dysmicoccus viatorius sp.n Philippines Williams (2004)
Exallomochlus hispidus (Morrison) Indonesia Williams (2004)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) India & Pakistan Williams (2004); Mani and
Krishnamoorthy (1989); Dorge and
Murti (1970); Savaliya et al.(2008)
Formicoccus (Panoccoides) robustus India Williams (2004)
Ezzat & McConnell comb
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) Caribbean islands Kairo et al. (2000)
India, Indonesia, Philippines, Williams (2004); Mani and
Singapore, Thailand & Vietnam Krishnamoorthy (1989); Babu and
Azam (1987); Murthy and Babu
(1996)
Florida Hodges et al. (2005)
Niapecoccus agathidis Williams Guadeloupe Ben-Dov (1994)
Niapecoccus lamentosus (Cockrell) Ben-Dov (1994)
Niapecoccus nipae (Makell) Ben-Dov (1994)
Paracoccus interceptus Lit. Philippines Williams (2004)
Paracococus marginatus Williams Florida
and Granara de Willink Caribbean Meyerdirk and Kauffman (2001)
Planococcoides nijalensis (Laing) Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus lilacinus (Cockrell) Indonesia, Malaysia & India Williams (2004); Shukla and Tandon
(1984b)
Planococcus citri (Risso) India Mani and Krishnamoorthy (1989)
Australia Murray (1982)
Planococcus minor Maskell India, Malaysia & Philippines Williams (2004); Shukla and Tandon
(1984b)
Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel Philippines & Malaysia Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus jackbeardsley Gimpel Vietnam Williams (2004)
and Miller India Shylesha (2013)
Hawaii Beardsley (1986)
Pseudococcus lepelleyi Betrem Java Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Ben-Dov (1994)
Tozzetti)
Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrhorn) Nearctic & Neotropical Ben-Dov (1994)
Rasrococcus spinosus (Robinson) Malaysia Williams (2004)
Rasrococcus iceryoides (Green) India Williams (2004)
Rasrococcus invadens Williams Ben-Dov (1994)
Trionymus lonipilosus De Lotto Tanzania Ben-Dov (1994)
49 Fruit Crops: Custard Apple 445

49.3 Seasonal Activity (Ckll.) (Dorge and Murti 1970). Dimethoate,


phosphamidon, monocrotophos and dichlorvos,
In peninsular India, mealybug population started all at 0.05 %, gave the best control of Planococcus
appearing in the last week of May and continued minor (P. pacicus) on custard apple (Annona
up to November. Peak infestation coincided with squamosa) However, when cost was also consid-
fruiting phase. In Andhra Pradesh (India), the ered, phosphamidon and dichlorvos were recom-
greatest populations of M. hirsutus were found mended for the control of the pest (Shukla and
on A. reticulata in June (Murthy and Babu 1996). Tandon 1984a). Spraying of diazinon or mono-
The pest prefers dry weather and heavy incidence crotophos at 0.1 % or 5 % neem seed kernel
often occurs following periods of prolonged extract or 3 % neem oil suspension was found
drought. effective against custard apple mealybugs
(Jayaraj and Ananthan 2009). Buprofezin can
also be tried against the custard apple
49.4 Natural Enemies mealybugs.

The parasitoids namely Anagyrus dactylopii


How. and Aenasius advena Compere were col- 49.5.3 Biological Control
lected from M. hirsutus and F. virgata, respec-
tively but parasitism did not exceed 5 % in both More than one species of mealybug commonly
cases. Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. and occur at a time on custard apple in peninsular
Spalgis epeus Westwood are found feeding on India. The Australian ladybird beetle
the custard apple mealybugs in India (Mani and Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant is highly
Krishnamoorthy 1989). Mealybug predators polyphagous known to prey on many species of
(especially Oligochrysa lutea (Wlk.), mealybug species on custard apple. Releases of
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. and Syrphus C. montrouzieri were made @ 30 larvae/plant
sp.) were recorded on P. citri. Parasitism of P. twice at 15 days interval resulted in the mealybug
citri by Leptomastidea abnormis (Gir.), was low, population (F. virgata and M. hirsutus) decline
and was unaffected by banding in south-eastern from 2450.90/plant in June to 5.20 in August dur-
Queensland (Murray 1978). ing 2000. In the custard apple orchards, C. mon-
trouzieri effectively controlled the mealybugs
within 75 days (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 2007).
49.5 Management In Queensland (Australia), C. montrouzieri was
found colonized on P. citri in custard apples
49.5.1 Mechanical (Smith 1991).
Leptomastix dactylopii is excellent parasitoid
The application of sticky bands to the trunks of of P. citri. In India, the exotic L. dactylopii was
custard apple trees in south-eastern Queensland recovered in smaller numbers from P. citri infest-
reduced the numbers of ants (Pheidole mega- ing custard apple in 2004 after initial release
cephala (F.)) in the trees and resulted in lower, made in citrus orchards 1983 in the same location
though still unacceptably high, levels of infesta- (Mani et al. 2007). However in 2006, the parasit-
tion by Planococcus citri (Risso) (Murray 1978). oid was recovered in large numbers from P. citri
infesting custard apple causing up to 70 % para-
sitism. Presence of L. dactylopii indicated that
49.5.2 Chemical there is some scope of exploiting L. dactylopii in
the suppression of P. citri infesting custard apple
Application of 0.1 % malathion applied at 6.5 in India. In Australia also, L. dactylopii played a
litres/tree caused the greatest reduction in num- major role in suppressing P. citri on custard apple
bers of the striped mealybug Ferrisia virgata (Smith 1991).
446 M. Mani

Crypyolaemus Spalgis epeus Cocoons of L. dactylopii

Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A, Gangavisalakshi PN (2007)


References Natural parasitisation by the exotic parasitoid,
Leptomastix dactylopii Howard on Planococcus citri
Babu TR, Azam KM (1987) Studies on biology, host on custard apple. J Biol Control 21:157158
spectrum and seasonal population uctuation of the Meyerdirk DE, Kauffman WC (2001) Status on the devel-
mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) on opment of a biological control program for Paracoccus
grapevine. Indian J Hortic 44(34):284288 marginatus Williams, papaya mealybug, in the
Beardsley JW (1986) Taxonomic notes on Pseudococcus Caribbean. Paper presented at IV International
elisae Borchsenius, a mealybug new to the Hawaiian Scientic Seminar of Plant Health, Veradero, Cuba,
Fauna (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Proc Hawaiian 1015 June 2001 (abstract)
Entomol Soc 26:3134 Murray DAH (1978) Population studies of the citrus
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso) and its natural
mealybugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: enemies on passion-fruit in south-eastern Queensland.
Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data Qld J Agric Animal Sci 35:139142
on geographical distribution, host plants, biology Murray DAH (1982) Efcacy of sticky banding of custard
and economic importance. Intercept Limited, apple tree trunks on ants and citrus mealybug,
Andover, 686 p Planococcus citri (Risso) (Pseudococcidae:
Dorge SK, Murti TK (1970) Control of mealybugs Hemiptera) in south east Queensland. Qld J Agric
(Ferrisiana virgata Ckll.) on custard apple with mod- Animal Sci 39:141146
ern insecticides in Maharashtra State. Plant Prot Bull Murthy GR, Babu TR (1996) Seasonal uctuation of
India 22(3):4047 mealybug on custard apple and grape. J Res ANGRAU
Hodges AC, Hodges GS, Wisler GC (2005) Exotic scale 24:8791
insects (Hemiptera: coccoidea) and whiteies Savaliya SD, Butani PG, Gedia MV, Prasad TV (2008)
(Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Florida tropical fruits; an The bionomics of the striped mealy bug F. virgata, a
example of vital role early detection in pest prevention major pest of custard apple. Ann Plant Prot Sci
and management. Proc Fla State Hortic Soc 16(2):389392
118:215217 Shukla RP, Tandon PL (1984a) Use of insecticides for the
Jayaraj J, Ananthan M (2009) Managing mealybug men- control of Planococcus pacicus Cox, a mealy bug on
ace in custard apple. Hindu, Thursday, 03 Sept 2009 custard apple. Entomon 9(3):181183
Kairo MTK, Poolard GV, Pterkin DD, Lopez VF (2000) Shukla RP, Tandon PL (1984b) Insect pests on custard
Biological control of the hibiscus mealybug, apple. F.A.O. Plant protection. Bulletin 32:31
Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green (Hemiptera: Shylesha AN (2013) Host range of invasive Jack Beardsley
Pseudococcidae) in the Caribbean. Integr Pest Manag Pseudococcus jackbeardsley Gimpal and Miller in
Rev 5:241254 Karanataka. Pest Manage Hortic Ecosyst 19(1):106107
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1989) Occurrence of mealy- Smith D (1991) The use of Leptomastix dactylopii
bugs and their natural enemies on custard apple around Howard (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) to control
Bangalore, S. India. J Biol Control 3(1):77 Planococcus citri (Risso) (Hemiptera:
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (2007) Field efcacy of Pseudococcidae) in custard apples in Queensland. Gen
Australian ladybird beetle, Cryptolaemus montrouz- Appl Entomol 23:38
ieri in the suppression of mealybugs on custard apple. Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Indian J Plant Prot 35:217219 Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Fruit Crops: Phalsa
50
M. Mani

Phalsa (Grewis asiatica Linn.) is cultivated in nellid Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Musant and
certain pockets of northern and peninsular India. the lycaenid Spalgis epeus Westwood were found
The pink hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus clearing the populations of the mealybugs on
hirsutus (Green), is known to occur on the leaves, phalsa in the eld (Mani and Krishnamoorthy
owers and fruits of phalsa in India. The cocci- 1996).

Mealybug damage to phalsa Cryptolaemus clearing the mealybugs

Reference
M. Mani (*)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1996) Reccord of two insect
Bangalore 560089, India pests and their natural enemies on phalsa. J Insect Sci
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in 9(2):182

Springer India 2016 447


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_50
Fruit Crops: Litchi
51
M. Mani

Mealybugs are injurious to litchi (Litchi chinensis) Table 51.1 (continued)


in Thailand, China, Japan, Indonesia, Singapore Mealybug species Country Reference
etc (Table 51.1). Pseudococcus CIE (1975)
comstocki
(Kuwana)
Table 51.1 List of mealybugs recorded on Litchi in dif-
Pseudococcus China http://www.
ferent countries
jackbeardsleyi plantwise.org/
Mealybug species Country Reference Gimpel and KnowledgeBank/
Dysmicoccus Thailand Williams (2004) Miller Datasheet.
lepelleyi aspx?dsID=45087
(Betrem)
Paracoccus Thailand Williams (2004)
interceptus Lit.
Planococcus China, Ben-Dov (1994)
litchi Cox Japan & References
Thailand
Planococcus Vietnam Williams (2004) Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
lilacinus bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
(Cockrell) Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
Pseudococcus Ben-Dov (1994) importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
viburni Cox JM (1989) The mealybug genus Planococcus
(Signoret) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Bull Br Museum (Nat
Pseudococcus Indonesia & Williams (2004) Hist) Entomol 58(1):178
baleiteus Lit. Thailand CIE (1975) Distribution maps of plant pests. Pseudococcus
Pseudococcus Singapore Williams (2004) comstocki [Distribution map]. Map 338. CIE, London
cryptus Hempel Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Planococcus Cox (1989) Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
litchi sp. nr. London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
(continued)

M. Mani (*)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 449


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_51
Fruit Crops: Jackfruit
52
M. Mani

52.1 Species 52.2 Damage

Mealybugs are injurious to Jackfruit (Artocarpus In India, severe infestation of the spherical
heterophyllus) in India, Vietnam, Bangladesh, mealybug was observed on shoots of jack fruit.
Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Tonga, Caroline islands, The mealybugs suck the sap, leading to drying of
Solomon islands etc (Table 52.1). shoots in severe cases; fruits were also covered
with mealybugs (Mani and Krishnamoorthy
1997).

F. virgata on foliage N. viridis damage to shoot & fruit

M. Mani (*)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 451


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_52
452 M. Mani

Table 52.1 List of mealybugs recorded on Jackfruit in different regions


Mealybug species Region/Country Reference
Dysmicoccus grassii (Leonardi) Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus neobreipes Beardsley Thailand Williams (2004)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) India Ghose (1961)
Yemen Marotta et al. (2001)
Hordeolicoccus nephalii (Takahashi) Vietnam Williams (2004)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) Ben-Dov (1994)
Niapecoccus viridis (Newstead) India Ghose (1961); Saha and Ghosh
(2001); Mani and Krishnamoorthy
(1997)
Bangladesh & Malaysia Williams (2004)
Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Sri Lanka Galanihe et al. (2010)
Granara de Willink Malaysia Mastoi et al. (2011)
India Mani Chellappan (2011)
Phenacoccus madeirensis Green Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcoides robustus (Ezzat & Ben-Dov (1994)
NcConnel)
Planococcus minor Maskell Malaysia Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus colliculosis Williams Tonga Ben-Dov (1994)
& Watson
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Ben-Dov (1994)
Tozzetti)
Pseudococcus marshallensis Caroline islands Ben-Dov (1994)
Beardsley
Pseudococcus solomonensis Williams Solomon islands Ben-Dov (1994)
Rasrococcus invadens Williams Ben-Dov (1994)
Rasrococcus spinosus (Robinson) Malaysia Williams (2004)

Table 52.2 Nipaecoccus viridis and its natural enemies on Jack fruit (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 1997)
No. of healthy mealybugs/shoot No. of natural enemies emerged/shoot (Mean S.D.)
Date of sampling (N. viridis) A. dactylopii C. perspicax
8-3-1996 24.96 3.18 16.46 2.52 0.42 0.14
18-3-1996 16.15 2.47 15.07 2.02 1.53 0.37
27-3-1996 0.10 0.02 0.58 0.23 0.22 0.03
SD standard deviation

52.3 Management mum of 16.46 and 1.53 of A. dactylopii and C.


perspicax respectively were collected on 8th
Local natural enemies are able to check N. viridis March and 21st March respectively. Mealybug
in India. The natural enemy complex consisted of population declined from 24.96 on 8th March to
a primary parasitoid, Anagyrus dactylopii (How.) 0.10 on 27th March (Mani and Krishnamoorthy
(Encyrtidae, Hymenoptera) and a drosophilid 1997) (Table 52.2).
predator Cacoxenus perspicax (Knab). A maxi-
52 Fruit Crops: Jackfruit 453

Angyrus dactylopii Cacoxenus perspicax

strategies for deployment and impact of the imported


References parasitoids of papaya mealybug, Classical biological
control of papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus)
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- in India, pp 8283
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1997) Suppression of spher-
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- ical mealybug, Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead)
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) on jack fruit. Entomon
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p 22(2):161163
Galanihe LD, Jayasundera MUP, Vithana A, Asselarachi Marotta S, Harten A, Van Mahyoub MA (2001) Mealybugs
N, Watson GW (2010) Occurrence, distribution and found on agricultural crops in Yemen. Bollettino di
control of papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Zoologia Agraria e di Bachicoltura 33(3):233238
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), an invasive alien pest in Mastoi MI, Azura AN, Muhammad R, Idris AB, Ibrahim
Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res Ext 13(3):8186 Y (2011) First report of papaya mealybug Paracoccus
Ghose SK (1961) Studies on some coccids (Coccoidea : marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from
Hemiptera) of economic importance of West Bengal, Malaysia. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 5(7):12471250
India. Indian Agric 5(1):5779 Saha A, Ghosh AB (2001) Biological studies on the
Mani Chellappan (2011) Impact of Acerophagous papa- mealybug, Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) on various
yae Noyes and Schauff on Paracoccus marginatus host plants. Uttar Pradesh J Zool 21(1):7578
Williams and Granara de Willink in Kerala. In: Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Proceedings of the National consulation meeting on Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Vegetable Crops
53
A. Krishnamoorthy and M. Mani

53.1 Tomato (Lycopercicon 53.1.2 Management


esculentum)
53.1.2.1 Chemicals
Mealybugs are injurious to tomato in several In the greenhouse, mealybugs (Pseudococcus
countries (Table 53.1). Phenacoccus solenopsis spp.) on tomatoes were suppressed with the
Tinsley was found to be an important pest of application of 20 % vermicompost extract
tomato in North, Central and South zones in India (Arancon et al. 2007; Edwards et al. 2010).
(Mohindru et al. 2009). Repeated chemical treatments were needed to
control Pseudococcus viburni in the Netherlands
(Schoen and Martin 1999). In Hungary, syner-
53.1.1 Damage gized pyrethrins afforded the best control of
Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrh.). The insecti-
Mealybugs remove the sap from plants and cause cides methomyl, phorate and oxamyl gave very
them to become weak. When mealybugs infest satisfactory and permanent control of mealybugs
tomato plants, they leave behind a honeydew (Ordogh 1983). Insecticidal soaps effectively
residue that attracts other insects, such as ants. control mealybugs, by stripping them of their
The pants are covered with black sooty mould. protective coating. Mealybugs on tomato are
Plants suffering from mealybug infestation will killed with the application of Dawn dish deter-
begin to turn yellow. Mealybugs like gent. Home remedies are often preferred because
Maconellicoccus hirsutus have toxic saliva that they protect fruit from harsh chemicals (Angela
distorts plant growth and affects their aesthetic LaFollette 2014).
value. Economic damage by mealybugs on
tomato was reported in Pakistan (Arif et al. 53.1.2.2 Biological Control
2009). Phenococcus solenopsis Aenasius bambawalei
Hayat is a potential biocontrol agent causing par-
asitism up to 30 % in India (Mohindru et al.
2009). About 77 % parasitism by A. bambawalei
was noted on P. solenopsis infesting tomato in
Pakistan (Khuhro et al. 2011).
A. Krishnamoorthy (*) M. Mani
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: akmurthy@iihr.ernet.in

Springer India 2016 455


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_53
456 A. Krishnamoorthy and M. Mani

Table 53.1 List of mealybugs recorded on tomato in different countries


Species Region/Country Reference
Coccidohystrix insolita (Green) Karnataka, India Gopalakrishna Pillai et al. (2011)
Dysmicoccus boninensis (Kuwana) Brazil Mark and Penny (2005)
Dysmicoccus neobreipes Beardsley Ben-Dov (1994)
Ferrisia consobrina Williams & Watson Australian, Ethiopian, Ben-Dov (1994)
Neotropical & Pacic
region
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) Bangladesh Ben-Dov (1994)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) USA
Paracoccus lycopersici Ezzat & Mexico Ben-Dov (1994)
McConnel
Paracoccus marginatus (Williams India Tanwar et al. (2010); Mani Chellappan (2011);
and Granara de Willink) CPPS (2012); Agrawal (1953)
Ghana Cham et al. (2011)
Florida Walker et al. (2003)
Sri Lanka Galanihe et al. (2010)
Hawaii Ronald et al. (2007)
Phenacoccus madeirensis Green Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero Africa http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/40173
Phenacoccus parvus Morrision Ethiopian, neotropical Ben-Dov (1994)
& Pacic region
India Williams (2004)
Queensland Swarbrick and Donaldson (1991); Marohasy
(1997)
Phenacoccus solani Ferris Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley Punjab (India) Mohindru et al. (2009)
Pakistan Arif et al. (2009)
Brazil Culik and Gullan (2005)
India Gopalakrishna Pillai et al. (2011);
Ashwathanarayana Reddy and Asosh Kumar
(2004); Anand Persad and Ayub khan (2006);
Suganthi et al. (2009)
Brazil Mark and Penny (2005); Culik and Gullan (2005)
Planococcus citri (Risso) UK Shariful and Jahan (1993)
Bangladesh
Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrh.) Hungary Ordogh (1983)
USA Gimpel and Miller (1996), CIE (1980)
Pseudococcus elisae Borkhsenius Hawaii Beardsley (1986)
Kiribati, Tuvalu, Williams (1988)
Papua New Guinea,
Philippines, Indonesia,
Brunei, Malaysia &
Thailand
Pseudococcus jackbeardsley Malaysia Williams (2004)
Gimpel and Miller Hawaii Beardsley (1986)
Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) Netherlands Schoen and Martin (1999)
France Kreiter et al. (2005)
Brazil Mark and Penny (2005)
Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
Rhizoecus falcifer Kunckel d Herculais Ben-Dov (1994)
53 Vegetable Crops 457

Coccidohystrix insolita Tomatoes grown in bird predator, Cryptolaemus grubs to 6.47.0


polyhouse were observed to be attacked by two mealybugs/plant as compared to 176.4 mealy-
species of mealybugs, Ph. solenopsis and C. bugs/plant in the check. The insecticides such as
insolita in Bangalore North. Phenococcus sole- buprofezin, profenophos and spirotetramat were
nopsis was the predominant mealybug attacking also found to be equally effective, and on par
all parts of the plants. The mealybug population with C. montrouzieri in controlling the Ph. sole-
was reduced with the release of Australian lady- nopsis (Gopalakrishna Pillai et al. 2011).

Ph. solenopsis on tomato Ph. madeirensis on tomato Cryptolaemus larva

Paracoccus marginatus The parasitoid Sri Lanka, Thailand, Vietnam; Palaearctic: China,
Acerophagus papayae Noyes could be used to Saudi Arabia (Ben-Dov 2013). Coccidohystrix
control Pa. marginatus on tomato in India as it insolita has been a serious pest of brinjal
proved to be highly effective against the above (Solanum melongena) in many parts of India
mealybug infesting other crops. including Bihar (Lall et al. 1976), West Bengal,
(Chaudhuri 1976) and Kerala (Gopinathan et al.
Pseudococcus viburni Two potential biological 1982). Economic damage by mealybugs on brin-
control agents, the predator Cryptolaemus mon- jal was reported in Pakistan (Arif et al. 2009).
trouzieri and the parasitoid Leptomastix epona,
were considered for the use in controlling the Damage Both nymphs and adult mealybugs suck
mealybug Ps. viburni infesting tomato in the sap from leaves and tender shoots. Heavy clus-
Netherlands (Schoen and Martin 1999; Germain tering of mealybug C. insolita usually is seen
et al. 2003). Biological control of Ps. viburni was under surface of leaves as a thick mat with waxy
undertaken in greenhouses in France using a par- secretion. They also excrete copious amount of
asitoid wasp from Chile (Kreiter et al. 2005). honey dew on which the fungus sooty mould grow.
Affected plants appear sick and black, resulting in
Planococcus citri Anagyrus pseudococci is reduced fruiting capacity. If the ower blooms are
potential parasitoid of Planococcus citri infesting attacked, the fruit set is affected. When the fruits
tomato (Shariful and Jahan 1993). are infested, they can be entirely covered with the
mealybug. The infestation may lead to fruit drop
or the fruits remain on the shoots in a dried and
53.2 Brinjal/Egg Plant/Aubergine shrivelled condition. It is also a notorious pest of
stored potato tubers. The stored tubers are found to
Mealybugs are injurious to brinjal in many coun- be infested during July and October, when sprout-
tries (Table 53.2). The brinjal mealybug C. insol- ing of the buds takes place. Coccidohystrix insolita
ita has been recorded in Afrotropical: Kenya, was active in September-March on brinjal but
Madagascar, Rodriques Island (Mauritius), South found during April-August on alternative wild
Africa, Tanzania, Zanzibar; Australasian: Western host plants such as Solanum nigrum and Solanum
Samoa; Oriental: Bangladesh, Burma xanthocarpum, and had a mean life-cycle of 15.06
(=Myanmar), India, Laos, Pakistan, Philippines, days in India (Lall et al. 1976).
458 A. Krishnamoorthy and M. Mani

Table 53.2 List of mealybugs recorded on eggplant


Mealybug species Region/country Reference
Coccidohystrix insolita Philippines Lit et al. (1998)
(Green) Bangladesh, India, Lall et al. (1976); Williams (2004); Krishnamoorthy and
Sri Lanka, Thailand Mani (1996)
Guam Moore et al. (2014)
Western Samoa Williams and Watson (1988)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) Philippines Lit et al. (1998)
India, Malaysia Williams (2004)
Pakistan
Maconellicoccus hirsutus India Anand Persad and Ayub khan (2006)
(Green) Trinidad Francis et al. (2012)
Paracoccus marginatus Ghana Cham et al. (2011)
(Williams and Granara de Florida Walker et al. (2003); Miller and Miller (2002)
Willink)
Sri Lanka Galanihe et al. (2010)
Palau Muniappan et al. (2006)
Hawaii Ronald et al. (2007)
Malaysia Mastoi et al. (2011)
Puerto Rico Pantoja et al. (2007)
Caribbean Meyerdirk and Kauffman (2001)
India CPPS (2012); Mani Chellappan (2011); Tanwar et al. (2010)
Paracoccus solani Ezzat & Australia, Peru, Ben-Dov (1994)
McConnel Costa Rico
Peliococcus trsipinosus Kenya Ben-Dov (1994)
(James)
Phenacoccus madeirensis Ben-Dov (1994)
Green Pakistan Williams (2004)
Phenacoccus parvus Ethiopian, Ben-Dov (1994)
Morrision neotropical
& Pacic region
Phenacoccus solani Ferris Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus solenopsis Pakistan Arif et al. (2009)
Tinsley India Jagadish and Shadakshari (2009); Tanwar et al. (2010)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Florida
Bangladesh http://www.aappbckv.org/journal/archive/6%20Sudden%
20outbreak% 20of% 20mealybug.pdf
Planococcus lilacinus Ben-Dov (1994)
(Cockrell)
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Philippines Lit et al. (1998)
India Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus longispinus Africa http://www.infonet-biovision.org/default/ct/94/pests
(Targioni Tozzetti)

53.2.1 Natural Enemies ris Sicard, Spalgis epeus (Westwood) (Ben-


Dov 2013 ), Cryptolaemus montrouzieri
A total of 23 species of hymenopterous para- (Puttarudriah and Channa Basavanna 1953 )
sitoids (Noyes 2013 ), fungus Metarhizium are associated with C. insolita. Anisochrysa
anisopliae (Chaudhuri 1976 ) , Fusarium equi- bonensis (Okaomota), Brumoides suturalis
seti (Corda) Sacc. (Gopinathan et al. 1982 ), (Fabricius), Hyperspis maindroni, Leptomastix
predators, Anegleis cardoni (Weise); nigrocoxalis Compere, Leptomastix lyciae
Hyperaspis maindroni Sicard, Nephus regula- Noyes and Hayat were known to attack C.
53 Vegetable Crops 459

insolita in Karnataka, India (Krishnamoorthy Keller was observed on the mealybug,


and Mani 1996). The fungal pathogen Coccidohystrix insolita infesting egg- plant in
Neozygites fumosa (Speare) Remaudiere & Philippines (Villacarlos 2000 ).

Coccidohystrix insolita on brinjal leaf

Varietal Tolerance Five aubergine lines/variet- gave excellent control of C. insolita in Andhra
ies were screened for resistance to C. insolita. An Pradesh (Tirumala Rao and David 1958) and
accession PI-381272-2 was found to be resistant Karnataka (Krishnamoorthy and Mani 1996) in
to C. insolita (Lit et al. 1998). India.

Paracoccus marginatus Heavy infestation can


53.2.2 Management cause defoliation and even death of the plant.
Two rounds of spraying were given starting from
Chemicals It is advocated to spray any one of owering stage at an interval of 10 days using
the following insecticides at 15 days intervals: knapsack hydraulic sprayer (Aspee, Mumbai)
dimethoate (Lall et al. 1976), malathion 0.1 % with a spray uid volume of 500 l ha1.
(Bhatti et al. 1975), profenofos 50EC @ 1 ml/l to Application of Pseudomonas uorescens @ (10 g
control Coccidohystrix insolita. The fruit yield l1) against Pa. marginatus in brinjal recorded 72
and return per rupee invested on plant protection % reduction in the mealybug population 10 days
were also high in dimethoate 30EC @ 0.5 after rst spray and 80 % reduction after the sec-
ml/l + NSKE 3 % (17.13 t/ha and 20.08) followed ond spray. Pseudomonas uorescens treatment
by profenofos 50EC @ 0.5 ml + azadirachtin 1EC gave signicantly higher yield than B. bassiana.
@ 1 ml/l (15.67 t/ha and 15.18) (Saminathan Signicant difference was also observed on the
et al. 2010). Castor-oil-based soft soaps were as yield of brinjal between the control plot (20.50 t
effective as sh oil soap recording 74.3077.14 ha1) and other treated plots. Spinosad and Fish
% reduction in the population of Ph. solenopsis oil rosin soap (FORS) recorded the highest yield
as compared to 88.6 % reduction with imidaclo- of 38.50 t ha1, 35.25 t ha1 respectively, followed
prid and spinosad (David et al. 2010). by P. uorescence (26.15 t ha1), B. bassiana
(25.92 t ha1) and combination of P. uorescence
and B. bassiana (25.80 92 t ha1). Interestingly,
53.2.3 Biological Control higher BCR was observed for FORS treatment
(6.71) with a net income of Rs. 299,985/ (Janaki
Coccidohystrix insolita A single larva of C. et al. 2012). The parasitoid Acerophagus papa-
montrouzieri was known to consume about 1100 yae Noyes could be effectively used for the sup-
nymphs of C. insolita. Release of C. montrouzieri pression of Pa. marginatus on brinjal.
460 A. Krishnamoorthy and M. Mani

Paracoccus marginatus on eggplant

and even from the stem of the plants. The insect


53.3 Okra heavily sucks the sap from the plant and renders
it weak, feeble and dehydrated. In severe cases
Mealybugs are injurious to okra in Pakistan, development of sooty mould takes on honeydew
India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Ghana, Trinidad produced by mealy bugs. The sooty mould
etc (Table 53.3). reduces the photosynthetic ability of the plants.
The fruits infested with mealybugs are inferior in
Damage Both nymphs and adults suck the sap the marketability.
from leaves, ower buds, petioles, twigs, fruits

Ph. Solenopsis on okra Pa. marginatus on okra M. hirsutus infesting okra


53
Vegetable Crops

Table 53.3 List of mealybugs recorded on okra in different countries


Mealybug species Country Reference
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) http://www.plantwise.org/KnowledgeBank/Datasheet.aspx?dsid=23981
Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley Pakistan Mustafa et al. (2009); Arif et al. (2009)
Hisar, Haryana, India Sharma (2007)
Maharashtra, India Sharma et al. (2008)
Punjab, India Satnam Singh et al. (2012)
Karnataka, India Jagadish and Shadakshari (2009)
Paracoccus marginatus (Williams and Coimbatore, India CPPS (2012)
Granara de Willink) Sri Lanka Galanihe et al. (2010)
Ghana Cham et al. (2011)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) India Singh and Ghosh (1976); Mani (1986)
USA
Planococcus citri (Risso) Bangladesh http://www.aappbckv.org/journal/archive/6%20Sudden% 20outbreak% 20of% 20mealybug.
pdf
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Trinidad Francis et al. (2012)
461
462 A. Krishnamoorthy and M. Mani

53.3.1 Management recommended. The hymenopterous parasitoid,


Aenasius bambawalei was able to parasitize Ph.
Phenacoccus solenopsis To check the spread of solenopsis up to 7080 % on okra (Sharma 2007).
mealybug, the weeds infested with mealybugs Brumus suturalis F. was collected on Phenococcus
growing adjacent to road sides, pathways, water sp. from the elds of the cotton, okra in Sindh
channels and waste lands should be removed. In Agriculture University, Tandojam (Khuhro et al.
case of severe infestation, spraying with 1.25 l of 2008). Spraying of insecticides if parasitized
profenophos 50EC or 2.0 l of quinalphos 25EC mealybug mummies are observed is to be
or 625 g of thiodicarb 75WP in 500 l of water is avoided.

Healthy Ph. solenopsis on okra Mealybug parasitized by A. bambawalei

Paracoccus marginatus The parasitoid


natural enemies increased from 0.3 to 3.8/plant.
Acerophagus papayae could be effective for the
The reduction of mealybug population in chow-
suppression of Pa. marginatus on brinjal and
chow eld was mainly due to the combined
other crops bordering brinjal elds.
action of C. montrouzieri and other local natural
enemies including Scymnus coccivora and the
M. hirsutus Cryptolaemus montrouzieri can be
drosophilid Cacoxenus persipicaux
used to control M. hirsutus infesting okra.
(Krishnamoorthy and Mani 1998).

53.4 Chow-Chow

The oriental mealybug, Planococcus lilacinus


was observed in severe form on Chow-chow
(Sechium edule) in Bangalore North during
October 1994. Due to release of the coccinellid
predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, the mealy-
bug population was reduced from 149.3 to 6.1/
plant in 42 days while the mean population of Chowchow fruit showing infestation by Pl. lilacinus
53 Vegetable Crops 463

53.5 Beans found infesting cauliower growing close to


infested Lantana camara in Queensland
In New Caledonia, the mealybug Ferrisia virgata (Swarbrick and Donaldson 1991).
on the beans (Phaseolus) was controlled by C.
montrouzieri (Cockerell 1929).
53.8 Chillies

53.6 Peas Paracoccus marginatus on Capsicum annum in


Ghana (Cham et al. (2011), Hawaii (Ronald et al.
C. montrouzieri is used to control the mealybugs 2007), India (Mani Chellappan 2011), Sri Lanka
on peas. The reduction in insect attachment force, (Galanihe et al. (2010), and on Capsicum fructe-
on plant surfaces covered with the crystalline scens in Ghana (Cham et al. (2011), Florida
wax, is explained by the decrease of the real con- (Walker et al. 2003) and Palau (Muniappan et al.
tact area between setal tips of beetle C. montrouz- 2006) were reported. Phenacocus solenopsis was
ieri and the substrate (Gorb et al. 2008). also found infesting.
Capsicum annuum L. in India (Tanwar et al.
2010). Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero
53.7 Cauliower was recorded on capsicum in Zaire (Leuschner
et al. 1978). Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrhorn)
The incidence of mealybug Planococcus lilaci- has been reported on peppers. Bougainvillea
nus (Cockrell) on cauliowers was reported. mealybug Phenacoccus peruvianus was recently
Severe infestation led to stunted plant growth, found infesting chilli peppers in Los Angeles
withering and reduced ower size (Loganathan County (http://ucanr.edu/blogs/pestnews/ index.
and Suresh 2001). Phenacoccus parvus was cfm?tagname=Bougainvillea%20mealybug).

Pa. marginatus on hot pepper [Capsicum](Gimpel and Miller, 1996) Ph. peruvianus on chilli peppers
(Photo by Gevork Arakelian)

53.9 General Management trol of caretaking ants that are important for the
of Mealybugs in Vegetables proper development of mealybugs. Without the
ants, the populations are small and they spread to
Plant protection measures are of limited effec- new areas and elds would be slow and free from
tiveness against mealybugs because of its habit of serious infestations of mealybugs. Therefore,
hiding in crevices and the waxy covering of its management of mealybugs often includes the
body. Mealybug control often involves the con- control of ant species (Table 53.4).
464 A. Krishnamoorthy and M. Mani

Table 53.4 List of mealybug occurring on different vegetable crops


Mealybug species Vegetables Region/Country Reference
Chlorozococcus pusillus Potato Kenya, Uganda Ben-Dov (1994)
(De Lotto)
Chlorozococcus pusillus Sweet potato Kenya, Uganda Ben-Dov (1994)
(De Lotto)
Coccidohystrix insolita Potato Pakistan Williams (2004)
(Green)
Dysmicoccus boninsis Sweet potato Ben-Dov (1994)
(Kuwana)
Dysmicoccus brevipes Potato Africa http://www.infonet-biovision.org/
(Cockerell) default/ct/94/pests
India Khan (1984)
Capsicum Ben-Dov (1994)
Artocarpa utilis Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus neobreipes Pumpkin Ben-Dov (1994)
Beardsley
Dysmicoccus cucurbitae sp. Pumpkin India Khan (1984)
n.
Dysmicoccus lepelleyi Artocarpus edulis Williams (2004)
(Betrem)
Dysmicoccus grassii Chow chow Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
(Leonardi)
Dysmicoccus lepelleyi Artocarpus edulis Asia Williams (2004)
(Betrem)
Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Onion Philippines Williams (2004)
Beardsley
Eupersia gerbace Danziga Onion Korea, Mongolia Ben-Dov (1994)
Ferrisia consobrina Potato Australian, Ethiopian, Ben-Dov (1994)
Williams &Watson Neotropical & Pacic
region
Phaseolus vulgaris Ben-Dov (1994)
Ferrisia virgata (Ckll) Cucurbita maxima http://www.plantwise.org/
Pumpkin, Cucurbita KnowledgeBank/Datasheet.
pepo aspx?dsid=23981
Sweet potato http://www.plantwise.org/
KnowledgeBank/Datasheet.
aspx?dsid=23981
cowpea http://www.plantwise.org/
KnowledgeBank/Datasheet.
aspx?dsid=23981
Okra, sweet potato, http://www.plantwise.org/
pumpkin KnowledgeBank/Datasheet.
aspx?dsid=23981
Dolichos, Coccinia Ben-Dov (1994)
indica
Formicoccus (Panoccoides) Pumpkin Pakistan Williams (2004)
robustus Ezzat &
McConnell comb
Geococcus coffeae Green Chillies Ben-Dov (1994)
Sweet potato India Williams (2004)
potato Ben-Dov (1994)
(continued)
53 Vegetable Crops 465

Table 53.4 (continued)


Mealybug species Vegetables Region/Country Reference
Heliococcus phaseoli Phaseolus Sierra Leone Ben-Dov (1994)
(Laing)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus Phaseolus vulgaris, USA
(Green) Brassica oleracea,
Pumpkin, Squash,
Tomato
Sweet potato Bangladesh
Dolichos Ben-Dov (1994)
Artocarpus altilis Caribbean Etienne et al (1998)
Artocarpus communis (manatee.ifas.u.edu/comm-hort/
pdf/pest-topics/InsectPHMHosts.
pdf)
Macrocepicoccus loranthi Drumstick Guyana Ben-Dov (1994)
Morrison
Nipaecoccus nipae Potato Bangladesh Begum and Begum (1995)
(Maskell)
Nipaecoccus viridis Potato India David and Ananthakrishnan
(Newstead) (2004); Williams (2004)
Paracoccus ferrisi Ezzat & Chillies Mexico Ben-Dov (1994)
McConnel
Paracoccus burnerae Potato Ethiopian region Ben-Dov (1994)
(Brain)
Paracoccus marginatus Luffa cylindrical Ghana Cham et al. (2011)
Williams and Granara de Curcubita sp. Ghana Cham et al. (2011)
Willink
Palau Muniappan et al. (2006)
Benincasa hispida India Mani Chellappan (2011)
Dolichos lablab India Mani Chellappan (2011)
Achyranthus aspera India Tanwar et al. (2010)
Amaranthus India Mani Chellappan (2011)
Phaseolus vulgaris USA
Cucumis melo Florida
Brassica oleracea Maldives Williams (2004)
Peas India
Phenacoccus madeirensis Potato Ben-Dov (1994)
Green Amaranthus Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus parvus potato Ethiopian, neotropical Ben-Dov (1994)
Morrision & Pacic region
Amaranthus Ethiopian, neotropical Ben-Dov (1994)
& Pacic region
Chillies India Williams (2004)
Phenacoccus pumilus Amaranthus Ben-Dov (1994)
Kritshenko
Phenacoccus solenopsis Several vegetables Pakistan Arif et al. (2009)
Tinsley
Phenacoccus solani Ferris Potatoes stored on a Oklahoma Anonymous (1979)
farm
(continued)
466 A. Krishnamoorthy and M. Mani

Table 53.4 (continued)


Mealybug species Vegetables Region/Country Reference
Planococcus citri (Risso) Brassia oleracea, Ben-Dov (1994); Williams (2004)
Cucumus melo,
pumpkin
Planococcus kraunhiae Faba bean & Broad Narai and Murai (2002)
(Kuwana) bean
Planococcus lilacinus Brassica oleracea India David and Ananthakrishnan
Cockerell (2004); Williams (2004)
Planococcus minor Potato Thailand Williams (2004)
(Maskell) Amaranthus Trinidad Francis et al. (2012)
Sweet potato Trinidad Francis et al. (2012)
Dioscorea sp. Trinidad Francis et al. (2012)
Colocasia sp. Trinidad Francis et al. (2012)
Pumpkin India Anand Persad and Ayub khan
(2006)
Cucumber, lettuce, Florida http://entnemdept.u.edu/
pepper, pumpkin, and creatures/orn/mealybug/
tomato, asparagus, mealybug.htm
beans, beets, cabbage
Brassica oleracea, Ben-Dov (1994)
Pumpkin, Chow
chow, Chillies
Sweet potato Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus Potato Ben-Dov (1994)
calceolarieae (Maskell)
Pseudococcus elisae Potato Pacic region and Williams (1988)
Borchsenius Southern Asia
Pseudococcus Chillies Brunei Williams (1988)
jackbeardsley Gimpel and Potato, Ivory gourd Hawaii Beardsley (1986)
Miller
Pseudococcus longispinus Several Vegetables Many countries Gillani et al. (2009)
(Targioni Tozzetti) Potato Israel Wysoki et al. (1977)
Potato Ben-Dov (1994)
Chillies Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus trukensis Bread fruit Ben-Dov (1994)
Bearsley
Pseudococcus viburni Potato UK Copland et al. (1993)
(Signoret) Potato South America Charles (2011)
Beet root, pumpkin, Ben-Dov (1994)
Chow chow
Rasrococcus iceryoides Dolichos Ben-Dov (1994)
(Green) Pumpkin India Williams (2004)
Vryburgia brevicruris Potato Australia, California, Ben-Dov (1994)
(McKenzie) Israel
Phaseolus vulgaris Australia, California Ben-Dov (1994)
& Israel
53 Vegetable Crops 467

53.10 Mechanical and Cultural 53.12 Chemical Control


Control
Chemical insecticides cannot be out rightly
The practices include removal of heavily infested rejected from mealybug pest control schedule.
shoots and fruits and destroying them, proper But selection of insecticides, which are compara-
sanitation in polyhouses and in the eld, use of tively safe to the insect natural enemies, should
clean planting materials will help in preventing be taken into consideration. Mealybug manage-
the mealybug infestations and removal of alter- ment includes locating the ant colonies and
nate host as well as weed plants in and surround- destroying them with drenching of chlorpyriphos
ing areas. 20 EC @ 2.5 ml/l or dusting with malathion; spot
treatment with any recommended insecticides
such as chlorpyriphos 0.05 % or carbaryl 0.05 %
53.11 Biological Control or fenitrothion 0.05 %; spraying with insecticidal
soap or horticultural oil or sh oil resin soap @ 2
Biological control of mealybugs is a promising, ml/l of water; soil drenching with imidacloprid
most effective long term solution and alternative 200 SL through drip irrigation @ 400 ml/ac;
to chemical control in commercial green house foliar spray with IGR buprofezin @1.25 g 1 g/l
crops to mealybug infestations to a large extent after 30 days of soil drenching; when parasitized
and also to limited scale in the elds. A number mealybugs or predators are present, spraying
of natural enemies, including several parasitoids with dichlorvos @ 2 ml/l, dimethoate @ 2 ml/l,
and predators are known to attack mealybugs chlorpyiphos @ 2 ml/l, imidacloprid @ 0.75 ml/l
even when their population densities is low and at 15 days interval and; use of dichlorvos (0.2 %)
they continue to attack the mealybugs, keeping in combination with sh oil rosin soap (25 g/l) as
their population at low level or wipe out the spray.
mealybug population. Biological control by
release of predators has been proved very suc-
cessful. The important predators of mealybug References
nymphs are coccinellid beetles such as
Cheilomenes sexmaculata, Scymnus coccivora Agrawal NS (1953) Life history of Phenacoccus insolitus
Green (the brinjal mealybug). Curr Sci 22:214
and Nephus regularis. Among predators,
Anand Persad B, Ayub Khan (2006) Attractiveness of
Australian ladybird beetle Cryptolaemus mon- hibiscus mealybug to different plant species. Insect
trouzieri has been used successfully to reduce Environ 11(4):175176
large populations of mealybugs in India. It is Angela LaFollette (2014) How to get rid of mealy bugs on
tomatoes with Dawn Dish Soap. http://www.ehow.
considered as one of the important predator of
com/how_12028758_rid-mealy-bugs-tomatoes-
many mealybug species occurring in greenhouses dawn-dish-soap.html#ixzz2sd0lkLp7
and interior landscapes. The other biocontrol Anonymous (1979) A mealybug (Phenacoccus solani)
agents reported to be found effective against Oklahoma new state record. Cooper Plant Pest Rep
4(16):260
mealybugs are Anagyrus pseudococci,
Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Yardim EN, Oliver TJ, Byrne
Leptomastix dactylopii, Coccidoxynoides per- RJ, Keeney G (2007) Suppression of two-spotted spi-
minutus for Planococcus citri and Anagyrus der mite (Tetranychus urticae), mealybug
kamali for Maconellicoccus hirsutus. The micro- (Pseudococcus sp.) and aphid (Myzus persicae) popu-
lations and damage by vermicomposts. Crop Prot
bial agents Verticillium lecanii and Beauveria
26(1):2939
bassiana are also effective during high humid Arif MI, Raq M, Ghaffar A (2009) Host plants of cotton
months in reducing the populations of mealy- mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis): a new menace to
bugs. Identity of mealybugs and selection of cor- cotton agroecosystem of Punjab, Pakistan. Int J Agric
Biol 11(2):163167
rect biocontrol agents play a major role in
Ashwathanarayana Reddy N, Ashok Kumar CT (2004)
suppressing the mealybugs. Insect pests of tomato Lycopersicon esculentum Mill
468 A. Krishnamoorthy and M. Mani

in eastern dry zone of Karnataka. Insect Environ aphid (Myzus persicae) (Sulz.), citrus mealybug
10(1):4041 (Planococcus citri) (Risso), and two spotted spider
Beardsley JW Jr (1986) Taxonomic notes on Pseudococcus mite (Tetranychus urticae) (Koch.) attacks on toma-
elisae Borkhsenius, a mealybug new to the Hawaiian toes and cucumbers by aqueous extracts from vermi-
fauna (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Proc Hawaiian composts. Crop Prot 29(1):8093
Entomol Soc 26:3134 Etienne J, Matile-Ferrero D, Leblanc F, Marival D (1998)
Begum S, Begum A (1995) On the life cycle of the potato First record of the mealybug Maconellicoccus hirsutus
mealybug, Pseudococcus nipae Maskell. Bangladesh (Green) from Guadeloupe; present state of this pest of
J Zool 23(2):251252 crops in the French Caribbean (Hem., Pseudococcidae).
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- [French]. Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique de
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: France 103(2):173174
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- Francis MA, Kairo WTK, Roda AL, Oscar E, Liburd OE,
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic Polar P (2012) The passion vine mealybug,
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p Planococcus minor (Maskell) (Hemiptera:
Ben-Dov Y (2013) ScaleNet. Coccidohystrix insolita. Pseudococcidae), and its natural enemies in the cocoa
Accessed 16 Dec 2013. URL: http://www.sel.barc. agroecosystem in Trinidad. Biol Control 60:290296
usda.gov/catalogs/Pseudoco/Coccidohystrixinsolita. Galanihe LD, Jayasundera MUP, Vithana A,
htm#Coccidohystrixinsolita Asselaarachchi N, Watson GW (2010) Occurrence,
Bhatti DS, Kadyan AS, Singh R (1975) Biology and distribution and control of papaya mealybug,
chemical control of the brinjal mealybug, Centrococcus Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae),
(Phenacoccus) insolitus (Coccidae: Homoptera). an invasive alien pest in Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res
Haryana J Hortic Sci 4:182185 Ext 13(3):8186
Cham D, Davis H, Ofori DO, Owusu E (2011) Host range Germain C, Kreiter P, Thaon M, Gory P, Capy A, Fave C,
of the newly invasive mealybug species Paracocccus Fournier C, Chabriere C, Vantalon C, Trottin-Caudal
marginatus Williams and Granara De Willink Y, Leyre JM, Visserot X (2003) Development of a
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in two ecological zones method for biological control of Pseudococcus viburni
of Ghana. Res Zool 1(1):17 in greenhouse tomato using entomophagous insects
Charles JG (2011) Using parasitoids to infer a native [French]. Colloque international tomate sous abri, pro-
range for the obscure mealybug, Pseudococcus viburni tection integree agriculture biologique, Avignon,
in South America. Biocontrol 56(2):155161 France, 1718 et 19 septembre 2003, pp 9095
Chaudhuri S (1976) Metarrhizium anisopliae (Metch.) Gillani WA, Copland M, Raja S (2009) Studies on the
Surokin on brinjal mealybug and its use in the biologi- feeding preference of brown lacewing (Sympherobius
cal control of the pest. Curr Sci 45(1):34 fallaxNavas) larvae for different stages of long-tailed
CIE (1980) Pseudococcus maritimus. [Distribution map]. mealybug (Pseudococcus longispinus) (Targioni and
Distribution Maps of Plant Pests. 1980. June, Map Tozzetti. Pak Entomol 31(1):14
404. Gimpel WF, Jr. Miller DR (1996) Systematic analysis of
Cockerell TDA (1929) Cryptolaemus montrouzsieri the mealybugs in the Pseudococcus maritimus com-
Mulsant and its allies. J Econ Entomol 22:271 plex (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Contrib Entomol
Copland MJW, Perera HAS, Heidari M (1993) Inuence Int 2(1):163 p
of host plant on the biocontrol of glasshouse mealy- Gopalakrishna Pillai K, Ganga visalskhy PN,
bug. Bull OILB/SROP 16(8):4447 Krishnamoorthy A, Mani M (2011) Utility of
CPPS (2012) Classical biological control of papaya Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant) for the manage-
mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus in Tamil Nadu ment of solenopsis mealybug, Phenacoccus solenop-
extension folder. Centre for Plant protection Studies, sis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on tomatoes
TNAU, Coimbatore 641003, 6 p in polyhouses. Presented at National Symposium on
Culik MP, Gullan PJ (2005) A new pest of tomato and Harnessing Bio-diversity for biological control of crop
other records of mealybugs (Hemiptera: pests, NBAII Bangalore, 2526 May 2011
Pseudococcidae) from Espirito Santo, Brazil. Zootaxa Gopinathan PV, Beevi NN, Nair MRGK (1982)
964:18 Occurrence of Fusarium equiseti (Corda) Sacc. as a
David BV, Ananthakrishnan TN (2004) General and fungal parasite of brinjal mealybug Coccidohystrix
applied entomology. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing, insolita (Green). Entomon 7(1):120121
New Delhi, 1184 p Gorb E, Voigt D, Eigenbrode SD, Gorb S (2008)
David PMM, Rajkumar K, Razak TA, Nelson SJ, Nainar Attachment force of the beetle Cryptolaemus mon-
P, Baskaran RKM, Rajavel DS (2010) Efcacy of cas- trouzieri (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) on leaet sur-
tor oil-based soft soaps against cotton mealy bug, faces of mutants of the pea Pisum sativum (Fabaceae)
Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley on brinjal. Karnataka with regular and reduced wax coverage. Arthropod
J Agric Sci 23(1):169170 Plant Interact 2:247259
Edwards CA, Arancon NQ, Vasko-Bennett M, Askar A, Jagadish KS, Shadakshari YG (2009) Sunower mealy-
Keeney G, Little B (2010) Suppression of green peach bug, Phenacoccus solenopsisTinsley (Homoptera:
53 Vegetable Crops 469

Pseudococcidae) and its parasitization by Aenasius strategies for deployment and impact of the imported
bambawalei Hayat (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). DOR parasitoids of papaya mealybug, Classical biological
Newsl, September 2009, p 7 control of papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus)
Janaki I, Suresh S, Karuppuchamy P (2012) Efcacy and in India, pp 8283
economics of biopesticides for the management of Mark PC, Penny JG (2005) A new pest of tomato and
papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Williams other records of mealybugs (Hemiptera:
and Granara de Willink) in brinjal (Solanum melon- Pseudococcidae) from Esprito Santo, Brazil. Zootaxa
gena L.). J Biopestic 5(1):8790 964:18
Khan JDK (1984) India-pineapple mealybug on potato. Marohasy J (1997) Acceptability and suitability of seven
FAO Plant Prot Bull 32(3):113 plant species for the mealybug Phenacoccus parvus.
Khuhro SN, Lohar MK, Nizamani SM, Abro GH, Khuhro Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
RD (2008) Biology of lady bird beetle, Brumus sutur- 84(3):239246
alis Fabricius (Coleoptera:Coccinellidae) on cotton Mastoi MI, Azura AN, Muhammad R, Idris AB, Ibrahim
mealy bug, Phenacoccus sp. Pak J Agric Agric Eng Vet Y (2011) First report of papaya mealybug Paracoccus
Sci 24(2):5358 marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from
Khuhro SN, Kalroo AM, Mahmood R (2011) Survey and Malaysia. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 5(7):12471250
Management of Cotton Mealybug Phenacoccus sole- Meyerdirk DE, Kauffman WC (2001) Status on the devel-
nopsis (Tinsley) on cotton and other host plants in dif- opment of a biological control program for Paracoccus
ferent districts of Sindh (Pakistan) in 2010. In World marginatus Williams, papaya mealybug, in the
Cotton Research Conference, 5 held at Mumbai from Caribbean. Paper presented at IV International
711 Nov 2011 Scientic Seminar of Plant Health, Veradero, Cuba,
Kreiter P, Germain C, Visserot X, Capy A, Fave C, Thaon 1015 June 2001
M, Giuge L, Gory P, Hantzberg H, Chabriere C, Leyre Miller DR, Miller GL (2002) Redescription of Paracoccus
JM, Fournier C, Rodriguez F (2005) Trials for biologi- marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink,
cal control of Pseudococcus viburni in tomato green- (Homoptera:Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), including
houses in France [French]. Phytoma 579:4852 descriptions of the immature stages and adult male.
Krishnamoorthy A, Mani M (1996) Suppression of brinjal Proc Entomol Soc Wash 104(1):123
mealybug Coccidohystrix insolita with Cryptolaemus Mohindru B, Jindal V, Dhawan AK (2009) Record of par-
montrozieri. Insect Environ 2:50 asitoid on mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis in
Krishnamoorthy A, Mani M (1998) Biological control of tomato. India J Ecol 36(1):101102
oriental mealybug, Planococcus lilacinus (Ckll.) on Moore A, Gillian W, Bamba WJ (2014) First record of
chow-chow. In: Parvatha Reddy R, Verghese A, Eggplant Mealybug, Coccidohystrixinsolita
Krishna Kumar NK (eds) Advances in IPM for horti- (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), on Guam: potentially a
cultural crops, pp 207209 major pest rst record of egg plant Mealybug,
Lall BS, Yazdani SS, Alam M (1976) Studies on the biol- Coccidohystrixinsolita (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae),
ogy and relative efcacy of some new insecticides on Guam: potentially a major pest. Data J 2:e1042 (23
against brinjal mealybug Centrococcus insolitus Jan 2014) 7/BDJ.2.e1042 (le:///H:/First%2
Green. Labdev J Sci Technol 11(1/2):68 0record%20of %20Eggpla.htm)
Leuschner K, Nwanze K, Carlos Lozano J (1978) Muniappan R, Meyerdirk DE, Sengebau FM, Berringer
Preliminary observations of the mealybug (Hemiptera: DD, Reddy GV (2006) Classical biological control of
Pseudococcidae) in Zaire. In: Proceedings cassava the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus
protection workshop CIAT, Cali, Colombia, 712 (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the Republic of
November 1977, pp 195198 Palau. Fla Entomol 89:212217
Lit IL Jr, Caasi-Lit M, Calilung VJ (1998) The mealybugs Mustafa A, Gulham Zafarullah S, Muthammad S (2009)
(Pseudococcidae, Coccoidea, Hemiptera) of eggplant Seasonal history and biology of cotton mealybug
(Solanum melongena Linn.) in the Philippines. Philip Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley. J Agric Res
Entomol 12(1):2941 47(4):423431
Loganathan M, Suresh S (2001) A record of mealybug, Narai Y, Murai T (2002) Individual rearing of the Japanese
Planococcus lilacinus (Cockrell) (Pseudococcidae mealybug, Planococcus kraunhiae (Kuwana)
:Hemiptera) on cauliower. Insect Environ (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) on germinated broad
7(1):1112 bean seeds. Appl Entomol Zool 37(2):295298
Mani M (1986) Distribution, bioecology and management Noyes JS (2013) Universal Chalcidoidea database. Query
of grape mealybug Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) result for parasitoids of Coccidohystrix insolita.
with special refrence to its natural enemies. Ph.D. the- Accessed 14 Dec 2013. URL: http://goo.gl/Wp2J7c
sis, UAS, Bangalore Ordogh G (1983) Host plants of Pseudococcus maritimus
Mani Chellappan (2011) Impact of Acerophagous papa- (Ehrhorn, 1900) and possibilities of control
yae Noyes and Schauff on Paracoccus marginatus [Hungarian]. Novenyvedelem 19(5):202206
Williams and Granara de Willink in Kerala. In: Pantoja A, Abreu E, Pena J, Robles W (2007) Paracoccus
Proceedings of the National consulation meeting on marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink
470 A. Krishnamoorthy and M. Mani

(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) affecting papaya in w w w. h i n d u . c o m / s e t a / 2 0 0 9 / 1 1 / 1 2 / s t o -


Puerto Rico. J Agric Univ P R 91(3/4):223225 ries/2009111250181400.htm
Puttarudriah M, Channa Basavanna GP (1953) Benecial Swarbrick JT, Donaldson JF (1991) Host range studies
cocinellids of Mysore I. Indian J Entomol 15:8796 with the lantana mealybug (Phenacoccus parvus
Ronald A, Heu, Mach T, Fukada, Patrick Conant (2007) Morrison). Plant Prot Quart 6(2):6869
Papaya Mealybug Paracoccus marginatus Williams Tanwar RK, Jeyakumar P, Vennila S (2010) Papaya
and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). mealybug and its management strategies. NCIPM
New Pest Advisory. http://www.hawaiiag.org/hdoa/ Techn Bull 22, 26 p
npa/npa04-03-PMB.pdf Tirumala Rao V, David LA (1958) The biological control
Saminathan VR, Senguttuvan T, Gajendran G (2010) of a coccid pest in South India by the use of beetle
Combined efcacy of neem and insecticides against Cryptolaemus montoruzieri Muls. Indian J Agric Sci
brinjal mealybug, Coccidohystrix insolita (Green). 28:545552
Madras Agric J 97(7/9):273274 Villacarlos LT (2000) Two Neozygites species
Schoen L, Martin C (1999) A new type of scale on (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales) infecting aphids
tomatoes. Pseudococcus viburni, a potential green- and mealybugs on Leyte island. Philip Entomol
house pest [French]. Phytoma 514:3940 14(1):3136
Shariful K, Jahan IM (1993) Inuence of honeydew of Walker A, Hoy M, Meyerdirk DE (2003) Papaya
citrus mealybug (Planococcus citri) on searching Mealybug. University of Florida Featured Creatures.
behaviour of its parasitoid, Anagyrus pseudococci. http://creatures.ifas.u.edu/fruit/mealybugs/papa
Indian J Agric Sci 63(11):743746 Williams DJ (1988) The distribution of the neotropical
Sharma SS (2007) Aenasius sp. nov., an effective parasit- mealybug Pseudococcus elisae Borchsenius in the
oid of mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis) on okra. Pacic region and Southern Asia (Hem.-Hom.,
Haryana J Hortic Sci 36(3/4):412 Pseudococcidae). Entomol Monthly Mag
Sharma OP, Bhosle BB, Deshpande GD, Bambawale OM, 124:14881491
Jagtap GP, Bhede BV, More DG, Patange NR (2008) Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Pest records on transgenic cotton in the Marathwada Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
region. Indian J Plant Prot 36(2):186191 London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Singh MP, Ghosh SN (1976) Studies on Maconellicoccus Williams DJ, Watson GW (1988) The scale insects of the
hirsutus (Green) causing bunchy top in mesta. Indian tropical South Pacic region. Part 2. The mealybugs
J Sci 4:99105 (Pseudococcidae). CAB International, Wallingford,
Singh S, Sharma R, Kumar R, Gupta VK, Dilawari VK 260 p. [In English]. [ISBN 085198 607 2]
(2012) Molecular typing of mealybug Phenacoccus Wysoki M, Izhar Y, Swirski E, Gurevitz E, Greenberg S
solenopsis populations from different hosts and loca- (1977) Susceptibility of avocado varieties to the long-
tions in Punjab, India. J Environ Biol 33(3):539543 tailed mealybug, Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni
Suganthi A, Kalyanasundaram M, Mahalaksmi V (2009) Tozzetti) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), and a survey
A buttery predator on cotton mealybugs. Online edi- of its host plants in Israel. Phytoparasitica
tion of Indias National Newspaper The Hindu 5(3):140148
Thursday, 12 Nov 2009. Available on-line at http://
Tuber Crops
54
M. Mani, M. Kalyanasundaram, C.A. Jayaprakas,
E.R. Harish, R.S. Sreerag, and M. Nedunchezhiyan

Mealybugs are injurious to tuber crops, mainly cassava, and 6 species of mealybugs known on
cassava (Manihot esculenta), and to some extent cassava in West Africa. Mealybugs are most inju-
to taro (Colocasia esculenta), yam (Dioscorea rious in South America. In the 1970s, the cassava
spp.), sweet potato (Ipomea batatas Lam.), tan- mealybug appeared and threatened to decimate
nia (Xanthosoma sagittifolium), elephant foot the African cassava industry (Greathead 1978).
yam (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius), yam bean An account of mealybugs attacking cassava in
(Pachyrrhizus erosus), and enset (Ensete Neotropics and Africa is given by Cox and
ventricosum). Williams (1981). Paracoccus marginatus
(Williams and Granara de Willink) invaded sev-
eral countries and caused severe damage to cas-
54.1 Cassava sava (tapioca), particularly in India (Shylesha
et al. 2011). Stictococcus vayssierei (Richard
54.1.1 Species [Homoptera: Stictococcidae]), wrongly called as
cassava root mealybug, is really cassava root scale
Mealybugs are highly injurious in South America, (http://www.cabi.org/iscbeta/datasheet/118988).
Africa, India, Hawaii, Philippines, and Thailand According to Parsa et al. (2012), a total of 24 spe-
(Table 54.1). According to Williams (1978), 10 cies of mealybugs are known to attack Manihot
species of mealybugs are known in the world on esculenta. A list of mealybug species reported on
cassava in different regions is given in table.
Among the mealybug species, Phenacoccus
M. Mani (*) manihoti, Phenacoccus herreni, and Paracoccus
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, marginatus are reported to cause heavy loss to the
Bangalore 560089, India cassava industry.
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in
M. Kalyanasundaram
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University,
54.1.2 Phenacoccus manihoti
Coimbatore 3, India
C.A. Jayaprakas E.R. Harish R.S. Sreerag
The cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti
Central Tuber crops research Institute,
Trivandrum 17, India (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), is one of the most
severe pests of cassava in the world. Phenacoccus
M. Nedunchezhiyan
Regional Centre of Central Tuber Crops Research manihoti, the neotropical species (South
Institute, Dumuduma, Bhubaneswar 751 019, India America), was accidentally introduced to Africa

Springer India 2016 471


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_54
472 M. Mani et al.

Table 54.1 List of mealybug species reported on cassava in different regions


Mealybug species Country/Region Reference
Dysmicoccus bispinosus Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
(Beardsley)
Dysmicoccus brevipes Ben-Dov (1994)
(Cockerell)
Ferrisia consobrina (Williams Ben-Dov (1994)
and Watson)
Ferrisia tereani (Williams and Argentina Ben-Dov (1994)
Granara de Wilink)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) India Williams (2004)
Congo Matile-Ferrero (1978)
Colombia Castillo and Bellotti (1990)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus The United States manatee.ifas.u.edu/comm-hort/pdf/pest-topics/
(Green) InsectPHMHosts.pdf
Paracoccus marginatus Ghana Cham et al. (2011)
(Williams and Granara de India Mani Chellappan (2011)
Willink)
Sri Lanka Galanihe et al. (2010)
Palau Muniappan et al.(2006)
Puerto Rico Pantoja et al. (2007)
Florida Miller and Miller (2002)
Indonesia Muniappan et al. (2008)
Malaysia Mastoi et al. (2011)
Thailand Saengyotl and Burikam (2011)
Phenacoccus gossypii (Tinsley) Colombia Milena Varela et al (1982)
Phenacoccus herreni (Cox and Latin America Dorn et al.(2003a)
Williams) South America Calatayud et al. (2001)
Colombia Castillo and Bellotti (1990)
Northeastern Brazil Bento et al. (2000)
Colombia Castillo and Bellotti (1990)
Phenacoccus madeirensis Malawi Borowka et al (1997)
(Green) Colombia Castillo and Bellotti (1990)
India Shylesha and Sunil Joshi (2012)
Phenacoccus manihoti Tanzania Mtambo (1995)
(Matile-Ferrero) Zambia Chakupurakal et al. (1994)
Zimbabwe Giga (1994)
Ghana Cudjoe et al. (1992)
Congo Reyd and le Ru (1992)
Ibadan, Nigeria Schulthess et al. (1991)
Sierra Leone James (1987)
Gabon Boussienguet et al. (1991)
Zaire Hennessey et al. (1990)
Bolivia, Brazil, and Lohr et al (1990)
Paraguay
Ivory Coast Minko and Bekon (2005)
Zambia Chakupurakal et al. (1996))
Malawi Borowka et al. (1997)
Colombia Castillo and Bellotti (1990)
Uganda Nweke (2010)
Hawaii Beardsley (1978)
(continued)
54 Tuber Crops 473

Table 54.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Country/Region Reference
Phenacoccus solenopsis The United States Ben-Dov et al.(2012)
(Tinsley)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Congo Matile-Ferrero (1978)
Planococcus furcisetosus Ben-Dov (1994)
(Mamet)
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Trinidad Francis et al.(2012)
Pseudococcus elisae The Philippines Lit et al.(1990)
(Borchsenius)
Pseudococcus longispinus Ben-Dov (1994)
(Targioni Tozzetti)
Pseudococcus mandio Paraguay, Bolivia, and Pegoraro and Bellotti (1994)
(Williams) Brazil
Pseudococcus maritimus Nearctic and neotropical Ben-Dov (1994)
(Ehrhorn)
Pseudococcus viburni Ben-Dov (1994)
Puto barberi (Cockerell) Neotropical Ben-Dov (1994)

in the early 1970s, and it has become naturalized (Matile-Ferrero 1978; Neuenschwander et al.
throughout sub-Saharan Africa. Phenacoccus 1991; Williams and Granara de Willink 1992;
manihoti, an oligophagous mealybug, is consid- Zeddies et al. 2001).
ered as the major pest on an international scale

Distribution of P. manihoti on cassava Parsa et al. (2012)


474 M. Mani et al.

Phenacoccus manihoti Ants attending cassava mealybug

Damage to cassava by P. manihoti

54.1.3 Damage terminal shoots, yellowing and curling of


leaves, reduced internodes, stunting, and weak-
Damage includes destruction of terminal shoots ening of stems used for crop propagation. The
and expanded leaves by sucking of sap (and mealybug feeding reduced new leaf production,
possibly by the introduction of a salivary toxin), and assimilation and allocation of dry matter to
leading to short internodes, small leaves, and storage roots. Yield of severely infested cassava
sometimes die-back. The economic damage is plants was lost between 9 % and 46 % during
partly from the loss of fresh leaves (which are the dry season. At the beginning of the rainy
edible) and partly from the loss in root yield. In season, mobilization of reserves from storage
some parts of Bas-Zaire, complete defoliation roots for regrowth caused temporary root yield
of cassava plants by the mealybug was observed losses of up to 75 %. Yield losses at harvest,
(Ezumah and Knight 1978). When P. manihoti measured 12 months after planting, were
feeds on cassava, it causes severe distortion of 5258 % in infested plants (Schulthess et al.
54 Tuber Crops 475

1991). In the absence of its natural enemies and Duration of rainfall had a lower effect, and rain
other control measures, this damage can reduce lasting 50 min or less caused less than 10 %
yields by more than 80 % (Nwanze 1982). reduction (le Ru and Iziquel 1990a).
Phenacoccus manihoti spread in Zaire occurs
over an area of 560,0002 km, mainly in regions
54.1.4 Varietal Susceptibility with a dry season of at least 90 days. Within the
region, the pest occurs principally in areas hav-
No cassava cultivars are known to be fully ing low green-leaf biomass, toward the end of
resistant to P. manihoti (Calatayud and Le R the dry season. Mealybug populations reached
2006). However, the Incoza variety was the catastrophic levels mostly during prolonged
most tolerant, followed by the Moudouma and periods of drought. The exotic parasitoid A.
Zanaga varieties. Dikonda, Kataoli, 3 M8, and lopezi has spread over 130,0002 km in western
1 M20 were highly susceptible (Tertuliano Zaire and southern Shaba, where no further
et al. 1993). The resistant clone 70,453 slows mealybug outbreak has since been recorded
down the buildup of mealybug populations and (Hennessey et al. 1990). In Nigeria, predicted
tolerates well the attack by mealybugs in Zaire yield losses in wet years were small, because
(Anonymous 1985). rainfall suppressed the population of P. manihoti
directly and enhanced the ability of the plant to
compensate for the feeding damage. In contrast,
54.1.5 Ecology losses in dry years were higher because of the
direct negative effects of water stress on photo-
In Ibadan, population peaks of P. manihoti usu- synthesis, which were compounded by the much
ally occurred during the second half of the dry larger population of P. manihoti that developed.
season (JanuaryApril). Apoanagyrus lopezi In Nigeria, the introduced encyrtid parasitoid A.
was the only natural enemy that was found dur- lopezi is the most important factor controlling
ing the whole year, and also in high densities the population of P. manihoti in the dry season,
(Hammond et al. 1987). In Congo, temperature and rainfall, directly or possibly via diseases,
appeared to be the most inuential factor on the during the rainy season. A. lopezi regulates P.
development time and on the capacity for manihoti in Nigeria, despite the disruptive effect
increase, which was highest (0.214) at 30 C of rain-induced mortality, drought effects on
and 75 % RH. Variations in abundance appeared host abundance, and predation by native cocci-
to be related primarily to the thermal conditions nellid beetles (Gutierrez et al. 1988). Severely
prevailing during the outbreak. Early multipli- infested cassava plants were lost between 9 %
cation of mealybug, beginning in July, under the and 46 % during the dry season, compared to
inuence of low temperature, would thus occur the pest-free plants. At the beginning of the
slowly, each generation being distinct with rainy season, mobilization of reserves from
clearly dened intervals in between, whereas a storage roots for regrowth caused temporary
late outbreak occurring under the inuence of root yield losses of up to 75 % (Schulthess et al.
high temperatures would develop more dramati- 1991). The population of Ph. manihoti was
cally, with a rapid succession of generations (le extremely low in all areas of Bolivia, Brazil, and
Ru and Fabres 1987) 1985. It was found that Paraguay, but there was a period of increase
intensity of rainfall seemed to be the most effec- from August to December (Lohr et al. 1990). In
tive factor, causing about a 22 % reduction. the Congo, during the wet season, torrential rain
476 M. Mani et al.

kept the populations at a low level by washing of the P. manihoti was observed in the Congo in
the insects (especially the crawlers) off the 1987. The development of the epizootic
plants. In the dry season, populations built up appeared to be more closely related to the fre-
rapidly, and outbreaks occurred, but these were quency of rainfall than to total rainfall.
rapidly reduced by the corresponding increases Conditions were highly favorable when the air
in the populations of natural enemies and in humidity was consistently greater than 90 % for
interspecic competition for the food plants, at least 5 h per day (le Ru and Iziquel 1990a;
from which many of the leaves had fallen, as a le Ru 1986).
result of the outbreaks (Fabres 1981). In Zaire,
the most important factor favoring multiplica-
tion and intensifying injury to the plants was hot
dry weather and dry eroded soil. The most effec-
Table 54.2 List of natural enemies recorded on P. mani-
tive control measures are therefore any cultural
hoti, F.virgata, and Ph.solenopsis infesting cassava
ones that help to conserve soil moisture, such as
Species Country References
erosion control, elimination of brush res, and
Phenacoccus manihoti
use of organic material as mulch or incorporated
Hyperaspis Nigeria Umeh (1983)
into the soil (Ezumah and Knight 1978).
marmottani (Fairm.)
Hyperaspis Congo Kiyindou et al.
senegalensis (1990)
54.1.6 Natural Enemies hottentotta
(Mulsant)
Explorations for the natural enemies of P. mani- Hyperaspis Congo Reyd and le Ru
raynevali (French) (1992)
hoti within its native range in South America
Hyperaspis Malawi Borowka et al.
(Bolivia, Brazil, and Paraguay) revealed the aestimabilis (Mader) (1997)
presence of four hymenopterous parasitoids Hyperaspis pumila Nigeria Iheagwam
(Angyrus sp. nr. pullus, Parapyrus manihoti sp.nr., (Mulsant) (1981)
Apoanagyrus diversicornis (Howard) Hyperaspis onerata Zaire and Bennett and
(Epidinocarsis diversicornis), Apoanagyrus (Mulsant) Congo Greathead (1978)
(=Epidinocarsis) lopezi (DeSantis), twelve pred- Ceratochrysa antica Nigeria and Barnard and
(Wlk.) Angola Brooks (1984)
ators, and one entomopathogenic fungus
Chrysopa sp. Nigeria Iheagwam
(Table 54.2), out of which the parasitoid
(1981)
Apoanagyrus lopezi appeared to be one of the
Exochomus Central le Ru and
most promising (Lohr et al. 1990; Pijls and Van aviventris (Mader) Africa Makosso (2001)
Alphen 1996; Noyes 1984). Apoanagyrus lopezi Congo Kiyindou et al.
takes 18 days to complete one generation (Odebiyi 1990)
and Bokonon-Ganta 1986). Exochomus troberti Malawi Borowka et al.
(Mulsant) (1997)
Exochomus avipes Gabon Boussienguet
(Thunberg) (1986)
54.1.7 Pathogens
Exochomus Congo Fabres and
concavus (Fursch) Matile-Ferrero
The epizootiology of the entomogenous fungus (1980)
Neozygites fumosa (Speare) in the populations (continued)
54 Tuber Crops 477

Table 54.2 (continued) 54.1.8 Management


Species Country References
Nephus vetustus Gabon Boussienguet 54.1.8.1 Chemicals
(Weise) (1986) Dimethoate, monocrotophos, diazinon, methida-
Coccodiplosis citri Gabon Boussienguet thion and methidathion + bromopropylate were
(Barnes) (1986)
more effective against P. manihoti as foliar sprays
Congo Fabres and
Matile-Ferrero
(Akinlosotu 1983; Anonymous 1989; Atu and
(1980) Okeke 1981a). Ten months after application,
Dicrodiplosis Congo and Harris (1981) methidathion, phosphamidon, and diazinon had
manihoti sp.n Senegal signicantly increased tuber yields, giving 25.6,
Cacoxenus Gabon Boussienguet 26.3, and 32.3 t/ha, respectively, compared with
perspicax (Knab.) (1986) 17.9 t/ha for the control (Atu and Okeke 1981b).
Allobaccha eclara Gabon Boussienguet Three applications of neem kernel water extract
(Curran) (1986)
(NKWE) at weekly intervals protected cassava
Diomus hennesseyi Malawi Borowka et al.
(Fiirsch) (1997) against established early-instar nymphs of P.
Scymnus couturier Ivory Coast Minko and manihoti (Mourier 1997).
G. Bekon (2005)
Spalgis lemolea Nigeria Iheagwam
(Druce) (1981) 54.1.9 Biological Control
Cardiastethus Congo Fabres and
exiguus (Popp) Matile-Ferrero
In the 1970s, the cassava mealybug P. manihoti
(1980)
Ferrisia virgata
appeared and threatened to decimate the African
Blepyrus insularis Congo Fabres and
cassava industry, and Greathead (1978) had out-
(Cam.) Aenasius Matile-Ferrero lined the biological control program to be followed
advena (Comp.) (1980) in Africa. To tackle the mealybug problem, two
Phenacoccus gossypii species of Apoanagyrus have been introduced
Scymnus sp., Colombia Milena Varela from South America into Africa as biological con-
Chrysopa sp., et al. (1982) trol agents against the cassava mealybug Ph. mani-
Coccidophilus sp.,
Ocyptamus hoti in 1981. About 50, 000 adults of Apoanagyrus
stenogaster (Will.), (formerly known as Epidinocarsis lopezi) were
and Kalodiplosis released in Congo, Gambia, Guinea-Bissau,
coccidarum (Felt.).

Parasitoids of Phenacoccus manihoti

Apoanagyrus lopezi Apoanagyrus diversicornis


478 M. Mani et al.

Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Togo, Zaire, and ited with preventing the malnutrition of millions of
Zambia during 19811984 for the biological con- Africans and may well be the most important
trol of Ph. manihoti on cassava. Later, they were example of classical biological control ever.
introduced into cassava elds in over 100 locations
throughout sub-Saharan Africa. Apoanagyrus
lopezi was released in Nigeria in November 1981. 54.1.10 Congo
The spread of the parasite in a large cassava-grow-
ing area of Nigeria was at 5170 km/year, and Three severe outbreaks of Ph. manihoti have
became established in 16 African countries. A occurred since 1976. Phenacoccus manihoti pop-
reduction in the number of mealybugs to below the ulations declined greatly in the second year after
injury level was observed in every zone colonized the release of A. lopezi. (Hennessey and Muaka
by A. lopezi. In those zones, mealybug populations 1987; Hennessey et al. 1990).
reached peak densities of 1020 per terminal cas-
sava shoot or less, as compared with more than
1500 per shoot before the introduction of the para- 54.1.11 Nigeria
site. The introduction of this parasitoid into Africa
in the 1980s reduced high infestations by 90 %, Apoanagyrus lopezi was imported in 1981 from
becoming a highly successful case of classical bio- Paraguay into Nigeria for the biological control
logical control. Apoanagyrus lopezi is an efcient of Ph. manihoti (Lema and Herren 1985). Within
biological control agent across several ecological 3 years, it dispersed over 200,000 km2 in south-
zones of the African cassava (Neuenschwander western Nigeria, occupying 70 %98 % of all
and Hammond 1988). The wasp has been effective elds (Herren et al 1987). The impact assessment
in bringing the mealybug under control and revealed that 89 % of all sampled cassava tips had
reduces yield loss by 2.5 t per hectare. The suc- no individuals of P. manihoti at all
cessful control of the cassava mealybug problems (Neuenschwander and Hammond 1988;
has raised cassava yields and turned cassava into a Hammond and Neuenschwander 1990).
cash crop that is now spreading throughout Africa.
Zeddies et al. (2001) calculated the total costs and
benets of this biological control program for 27 54.1.12 Gabon
African countries over a 40-year period (1974
2013) under different scenarios, such as transport, The exotic encyrtid parasitoid Apoanagyrus
loss of crop, and even the price of maize as a pos- lopezi was introduced in Gabon for the biological
sible substitute. Based on the total cost of biologi- control of the cassava mealybug Ph. manihoti in
cal control at US$ 47 million, the benets from 1986. The establishment of the parasitoid after
different scenarios range mainly from 199:1 (or introduction showed a speed of dispersal of
US$ 9.4 billion) to 430:1 (or US$ 202 billion) 70120 km/year (Boussienguet et al. 1991).
(Williams and Granara de Willink 1992). Each
dollar spent on the mealybug control project
brought returns worth at least US$150 to the 54.1.13 Ghana and Ivory Coast
farmer. The overall economic benet of control-
ling the mealybug has been estimated at between P. manihoti in Ghana and Ivory Coast. P. mani-
US$9 billion and US$20 billion. Pedigo (1999) hoti populations were signicantly lower where
commented that the tremendous success is cred- A. lopezi had been present. In the savanna zone,
54 Tuber Crops 479

tuber yield losses due to P. manihoti in the 54.1.16 Zambia


absence of A. lopezi were tentatively estimated at
463 g/plant in the savannah zone. When A. lopezi From 1984 onward, parasitoid A. lopezi and some
was present, the increase in yields was 228 g/ coccinellid predators were released into Zambia.
plant or about 2.48 t/ha in the savannah region Between 1986 and 1990, populations of P. mani-
(Neuenschwander et al. 1989). hoti declined by, on average, 5.8 times, and the
biological control of the P. manihoti in Zambia
was successful (Chakupurakal et al. 1994).
54.1.14 Malawi

P. manihoti was conrmed damaging cassava in 54.1.17 Southeast Asia


Nkhata Bag, Malawi, and Apoanagyrus lopezi
was introduced in 1985. Parasitism by P. manihoti remains a threat to the cassava areas
Apoanagyrus lopezi rose to 50 % (Nyirenda of southern Asia. P. manihoti was rst detected in
1988). Wherever Apoanagyrus lopezi had been Thailand in 2008 (Winotai et al 2010). Yields dur-
present for 2 years or more, P. manihoti popula- ing the March/April 2010 harvest reported a drop
tions were reduced by seven times of about 25 %, and economic losses resulting
(Neuenschwander et al. 1991). from mealybug damage were expected to be 2.8
billion Baht. With the appearance of the mealy-
bug, the Department of Agriculture estimated
54.1.15 Tanzania losses of 40 %50 %, adding up to more than
US$150200 million in crop damage in the rst
The endoparasitic wasp, Apoanagyrus lopezi, year alone. Further, it was also detected in Vienam,
was introduced into Tanzania in 1988. By 1991, Lao PDR, Cambodia, Myanmar, and threatens to
A. lopezi was well established in all regions, and engulf regions of cassava-growing plots. Cassava-
the population of P. manihoti declined, and has growing areas of southern China, Indonesia, and
since remained low (Mtambo 1995). Philippines are considered vulnerable (Muniappan
et al. 2009; Wu and Wang (2011).

Cassava stem infested with P. manihoti in Thailand. Apoanagyrus lopezi from Benin to Thailand
480 M. Mani et al.

A. lopezi (500) that once saved Africas cas- declined sharply with the onset of rains (Van
sava farmers was brought on a ight from Benin Driesche et al. 1990).
to Bangkok. The Department of Agriculture is
now raising and releasing a quarter of a million
wasps in Thailand. The rst ofcial release began 54.1.20 Varietal Resistance
in July in the countrys northeast Tony Bellotti.
Instead of 10 years, it takes only a year or so to In Colombia, six clones (CM 21772, SG 100
respond (Paul Cox 2010). 54, SG 2503, CM 60683, CM 52631, and SM
5408) were identied tolerant or moderately
resistant to P. herreni, which can cause yield
54.1.18 Phenacoccus herreni losses up to 88 % (Bellotti and Vargas 1991).

P. herreni causes yield losses in cassava in South


America, attacking the young shoots and causing 54.1.21 Natural Enemies of P. herreni
rosetting, stunting, and shoot and stem malfor-
mations (Bellotti 1983). Parasitoids In Colombia, P. herreni was found
parasitized by the encyrtids Acerophagus coccois
(Smith) and Anagyrus (Epidinocarsis) diversi-
54.1.19 Ecology cornis. The combined action of the parasitoid
species present caused 54.9 % mortality in the
The mealybugs are spread largely by wind and by mealybug population as estimated by a new ana-
the movement of infested plant material (Bellotti lytical method (Van Driesche et al. 1990; Castillo
1983). P. herreni densities in Colombia were and Bellotti 1990). In Colombia, the main para-
highest in the dry season. Mealybug densities had site was Anagyrus sp. (9.2 %) in 1981 and
Acerophagus coccois (73 %) in 1982.

Acerophagus coccois Aenasius vexans


54 Tuber Crops 481

(Bellotti 1983). Preferential oviposition by Acerophagus coccois and Aenasius vexans were
Anagyrus diversicornis and Acerophagus coccois introduced from Venezuela. By the end of 1996, a
was second and third instar nymphs and adult total of 35,930 parasitoids had been released. In
mealybugs. Bahia, A. diversicornis was recovered at 130, 234,
304, and 550 km from its release site after 6, 14,
Predators Six species of coccinellids, including 21, and 33 months, respectively. Acerophagus
Hyperaspis notate and H. onerata, were discov- coccois was recovered at 180 km from its release
ered in cassava elds infested with P. herreni in site, 9 months after release. Aenasius vexans,
Colombia (Carrejo et al. 1991; Castillo and however, did not disperse at all, despite being
Bellotti 1990; Sullivan, et al.(1991). The syrphid consistently recovered at its release site. In
Ocyptamus sp. was frequently found consuming Pernambuco, 9010 parasitoids were released from
eggs of P. herreni (Castillo and Bellotti 1990). In October 1995 onward. Acerophagus coccois and
Colombia, the main predator was found to be Aenasius vexans were recovered up to 40 km from
Ocyptamus stenogaster (Will.) forming 68 % of the release sites after 3 and 5 months of their ini-
all natural enemies in 1981 and Kalodiplosis coc- tial releases, respectively (Bento et al. 1999). The
cidarum (Felt) (11.6 %) in 1982 (Bellotti 1983). impact studies conducted between 1994 and 1997
indicated that at least 85 % of the parasitoids
Fungi P herreni, in May 1994, at Cruz das found in those elds were composed of the
Almas, Bahia, Brazil, were found to be infected recently introduced species Apoanagyrus diversi-
with Neozygites fumosa (Delalibera et al. 1997). cornis, Aenasius vexans, and Acerophagus coc-
In Colombia, a pathogenic fungus, Cladosporium cois. Apoanagyrus diversicornis was found in all
sp., was observed on P. herreni, being most effec- elds during most of the experimental period,
tive at high host densities (Bellotti 1983). whereas Acerophagus coccois and Aenasius vex-
ans were only found in the elds where they had
been released. Apoanagyrus diversicornis out-
54.1.22 Management competed Aenasius vexans in Sao Goncalo, but
not Acerophagus coccois in Itaberaba. The con-
Three encyrtid parasitoids, Apoanagyrus diversi- certed action of the three introduced parasitoids
cornis (Howard), Aenasius vexans (Kerrich), and and the native natural enemies was sufciently
Acerophagus coccois (Smith), are used to control efcient to control P. herreni at low levels in the
the cassava mealybug P. herreni in South America elds (Bento et al. 2000).
(Calatayud et al. 2001; Dorn et al. 2003a). For
efcient eld application, it is suggested to release
A. vexans and A. coccois late in the morning, dur- 54.2 Paracoccus marginatus
ing its period of increasing activity (Dorn et al.
2003b). A multispecies (A. vexans and A. coccois) Paracoccus marginatus (PMB), a polyphagous
approach to biological control of P. herreni may pest, is native of Central America/ Mexico, infest-
yield best results. ing more than 60 species of plants invaded over
In six states in northeastern Brazil, the mealy- 50 countries. In India, it was rst reported on cas-
bug P. herreni causes considerable damage to cas- sava from Tamil Nadu during 2008 (Muniappan
sava. Several native natural enemy species were et al. 2008), infesting a wide list of agricultural
found associated with the pest in Brazil but did and horticultural crops, including cassava/tapioca.
not provide adequate control. Exotic encyrtid par- Though Paracoccus marginatus was reported on
asitoids were imported and released in elds in cassava in more than nine countries, only in India,
the states of Bahia and Pernambuco. Apoanagyrus particularly in Tamil Nadu and Kerala, the cas-
diversicornis was introduced from Colombia, and sava crop was found severely damaged.
482

Paracoccus marginatus Damage to cassava Acerophagus papayae


M. Mani et al.
54 Tuber Crops 483

Heavy clustering of mealybugs was seen observed in a pre-release survey in all three loca-
under the leaf surface, giving the appearance of a tions. An average of 6.08 % parasitism and
thick mat with waxy secretion. They excrete 11.51 % reduction in papaya mealybug was
copious amount of honeydew that attracts ants recorded. The mealybug population had declined
and helps in the development of black sooty uniformly, corresponding to the gradual increase
mould, which inhibits the plants ability to manu- in percent parasitism at 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th
facture food. This pest infests all aerial parts of months in all three locations. The average popu-
the plant. Infestation at the initial stage is lation of papaya mealybug from the tapioca gar-
observed on the leaf, particularly on the ventral dens was eliminated up to 93.15 % at 6th month
surface and petiole, and later it spreads to stems corresponding to 76.33 % parasitism. Parasitism
and branches. Heavy infestation causes leaf- by A. papayae accounted for 80.8994.31 %. It is
shedding and yield loss. The mealybug infesta- concluded that the release of A. papayae at 200
tion varied from 50 to 90 % in cassava, resulting individuals per location alone is sufcient to
in a monetary loss of Rupees 220 crores in cas- eradicate the population of papaya mealybug,
sava alone in Tamil Nadu. rather than the application of chemicals (Sakthivel
2013). Similar control of the mealyugg was
achieved with the release of A.papayae in other
54.2.1 Management districts, namely, Trichy, Erode (Divya 2012),
and Karur (Vijay 2010) in Tamil Nadu, India.
A comprehensive integrated pest management Tapioca is a major tuber crop of Kerala, and its
practices, viz., early detection by timely monitor- yield was reduced considerably by the infestation
ing, removal and destruction of affected plants of P.marginatus. In Kerala, total area for tapioca
and weeds, conserving natural enemies like pre- cultivation is 75,000 ha, and production is 30 t/ha.
dacious coccinellid beetles, lepidopteran preda- The mealybug infestation affected the tapioca pro-
tor, Spalgis epeus, and need-based application of duction to a great extent. Due to the release of
insecticides were developed. Even after adoption Acerophagus papaya in 2011, tapioca crop was
of IPM, the population of papaya mealybug was saved. Approximate cost of cultivation is Rs.
found to increase at a faster rate for want of ef- 50,000/ha, and the income is Rs. 3 lakhs/ha/year
cient natural enemies, since the pest is invasive (at Rs. 10,000/t). Thus, the net savings is 2.5 lakhs/
(introduced from other country), and the chemi- ha and 1.8 crores/year in Kerala, with the release of
cal control is short-lived and farmers have to Acerophagus papaya (Lyla, personal communica-
spray once in a fortnight. tion). Central Tuber Crop Research Institute,
Severe infestation of P.marginatus was Trivandrum (CTCRI) developed bioformulations
observed on cassava in Namakkal, Salem, and SHREYA and NANMA, which are very effec-
Dharmapuri districts of Tamil Nadu state tive against P.marginatus (http://www.yentha.com/
(Sakthivel and Qadri 2010), besides Coimbatore, news/view/4/bio-pesticides-developed-from-
Karur, Erode, Thirupur, and Trichy districts. tapioca-leaves).
Since Acerophagus papayae has provided excel-
lent control of P.marginatus in many countries, it
was imported from Puerto Rico in June 2010, and 54.3 Phenacoccus gossypii
releases were made in Tamil Nadu in 2010.
Population densities of papaya mealybug on Large populations of the mealybug Phenacoccus
cassava and percent parasitism in the three sam- gossypii (Tns. & Ckll.) had built up on cassava in
pling sites before and after release of parasitoids the Llanos Orientales, Colombia.. Seven species
are given in Table. Heavy population load of of parasitoids, of which the most important was
38.70, 43.85, and 41.21 numbers/5 cm2 was Anagyrus sp., and 18 species of predators were
recorded in Salem, Dharmapuri, and Namakkal observed in the eld. The most effective of the
districts, respectively. No parasitism was predators in controlling the populations of Ph.
484 M. Mani et al.

gossypii were Scymnus sp., Chrysopa sp., 54.5 Yam Dioscorea spp.
Coccidophilus sp., Ocyptamus stenogaster
(Will.), and Kalodiplosis coccidarum (Felt.) Three species of mealy bugs, including
(Milena Varela et al.1982). Planococcus lilacinus (Cockerell), P. citri, and P.
dioscorea have been reported to evoke a devastat-
ing impact on the yam tubers (Morse et al. 2000).
54.4 Sweet Potato Postharvest loss of tubers of yams and aroids due
to pests and diseases has ever been havoc. In
Paracoccus marginatus is known to attack a vari- warehouses and storage huts, insect pests are the
ety of crop plants, including sweet potatoes. The more serious menace to stored tubers and often
mealybugs feed, often in groups, on the underside more important than storage diseases. Damage
of leaves. Feeding on leaves by sucking out tissue inicted by the insects facilitates the entry of
uid, they release a poison into the plant tissue pathogens; besides, pests themselves indulge in
and secrete a sticky, sweet substance, called hon- spreading microbial contamination.
eydew. Where honeydew falls, a black fungal
growth called sooty mould develops. Although
this fungus does not harm plants directly, it blocks
out sunlight essential for the plant growth. The
mealybug infestations lead to stunted growth, dis-
coloration, malformed foliage, and defoliation of
sweet potato plants. To control papaya mealybugs
on sweet potato plants, gardeners should begin
with a biological approach by releasing natural
enemies, particularly Acerophagus papayae. For
severe infestations, applications at twice the nor-
mal rate of a pesticide, with an active ingredient
such as carbaryl or malathion, offer some control,
particularly when used alongside cultural mea- Mealybug damage to Dioscorea
sures (Tarah Damask What Causes White Bumps
on Sweet Potato Leaves? (http://homeguides.
sfgate.com/causes-white-bumps-sweet-potato- Feeding activity of the mealybugs not only
leaves-42692.html). Sweet potatoes are known to makes the tubers unattractive and unmarketable
be infested with mealybugs in storage. but also predisposes them to rot (Vasquez and
Buyser 2007; Rajamma et al. 2002). Infestation
of mealybugs leads to qualitative and quantitative
deterioration of the tubers, which culminates in
the unacceptability and low-prole marketability
of the tubers (Chomchalow, 2003). Palaniswami
and Pillai (1989) and Korada et al. (2010)
reported the qualitative and quantitative deterio-
ration of tubers of yams and aroids due to the
infestation by mealybugs. Palaniswami et al.
(1982) reported the incidence of Ferrisia virgata
(Cockerell) on sweet yam (Dioscorea dumeto-
rum). They desap the leaves, and the high inci-
dence of this pest causes drying of leaves and
Mealybugs on sweet potato withering.
54 Tuber Crops 485

54.6 Elephant Foot Yam the storage was for planting purpose, the corms
(Amorphophallus paeoniifolius) should be treated with fenitrothion (0.05 %) + man-
cozeb (0.2 %). (http://odisha.gov.in/e-magazine/
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius, popularly known Orissareview/2008/Sept-Octo-2008/eng-
as elephant foot yam, is an important tropical pdf/64-66.pdf). A two-instalment spray/drench
tuber crop in India. Mealybug (Rhizoecus amor- application of imidacloprid spaced 34 weeks
phophalli), a soft-bodied insect, infests the corms, apart resulted in complete control with zero phyto-
both in storage and in the eld (Misra et al. 2013). toxicity noted on any of the very mixed collection
Rhizoecus amorphophalli (Betrem) was widely (http://www.aroid.org/aroidl-archive/showthread.
distributed in South Asia, infesting many tuber php?id=3696). CTCRI-developed bioformula-
crops (Williams 2004). Mealybugs are seen in tions SHREYA and NANMA are very effec-
clusters on the stem, petiole, and leaf, particularly tive against the pests. Spraying neem oil at a
on the lower side. Infestation is high during warm concentration of 2 % at 15 days interval was found
and dry periods. Usually, the Amorphophallus effective to reduce the incidence (http://www.yen-
seed corms are harvested during the dry season, tha.com/news/view/4/bio-pesticides-developed-
after the crop is fully matured. During this period, from-tapioca-leaves).
mealybugs enter soil cracks and holes formed Though pesticides are effective in controlling
after drying of the pseudostem, and infest the mealybugs, they can be hazardous to human
corms. Infestation becomes severe when the health and the environment. Salt (NaCl) solution
corms are left for longer periods in the soil during (1000 ppm), cow urine, cow dung slurry (2 kg of
the dry season. Mealybug is a pest that thrives in cow dung in 1 L of water), and clay slurry (1 kg of
hot and humid conditions. When the temperature clay in 1 L of water) treatments were effective in
is more than 30 C, its infestation is severe, and reducing mealybug numbers and the associated
increases with rising temperature and humidity. corm damage. However, availability of cow urine,
Tubers are stored in storehouses, after harvesting, cow dung, and clay slurry limits their usage.
until further use. During storage, Rhizoecus amor- Common salt is cheap, widely available, and easy
phophalli (Betrem) causes 1015 % loss of tuber. to use in treating the corms prior to storage.
In the absence of mealybug control measures, Relative to untreated corms, those treated with
mealybug numbers increased by 45 times during salt solution recorded greater emergence when
the storage period. The pest affected the quality of eld-planted, as well as producing plants with
the corms and reduced subsequent eld establish- more vigorous growth (Nedunchezhiyan et al.
ment and crop growth. Infestation also affects the 2011). Cryptolaemus montruzieri was found pre-
corms ability to sprout, which then affects subse- dating on Rhizoecus amorphophalli in the storage.
quent production and productivity. Two species of It is recommended to maintain a temperature
mealybugs Ps.citriculus (Green) and Rhizoecus range between 25 C and 30 C in the elephant
sp. (Bit) are found together, and they suck and foot yam storage houses, as this temperature is
desap the cell contents of the tubers (Palaniswami most congenial for development, activity of
(1999). The eld infestation ranged from 6 to C. Montrouzieri, and for successful control of
45 %. Mealybugs multiplied during high tempera- mealybugs. Approximately two to three numbers
ture and humidity. They cover the tuber surface of C. montrouzieri are required for each infested
with powdery mealy substances. Severely infested tuber to control mealybugs. Accordingly, the
tubers shriveled, adversely affecting the quality predator can be released in storage godowns. As
and marketability. Several methods have been there is also natural parasitization of mealybugs
tried for controlling mealybugs. Rubbing of by Anomalicornia tenuicornis (Mercet)
infested corms with a dry cloth /soft brush, and (Encyrtidae, Hymenoptera), C. montrouzieri and
forcefully washing the corms with water are some A. tenuicornis together can contribute to the suc-
of the management practices which are cessful control of mealybug in storage, making
recommended. However, re-infestation after some the tubers suitable for planting during subsequent
time is common when using these techniques. If times (Misra et al. 2013).
486 M. Mani et al.

Mealybugs on elephant foot yam

54.7 Yam Bean

Yam bean (Pachyrrhizus erosus (L) Urban), oth-


erwise called potato bean, is grown for its starchy
root. The stripped mealybug Ferrisia virgata
(Cockerell) infestation was found infesting on
yam bean seed crop in Orissa State, India. At the
time of infestation, the crop was in fruiting stage.
The plants were full of immature young pods. The
initial infestation was found on the lower side of
the bottom leaves. Soon, it was seen on growing
points and young immature pods. Initially, the
infested parts were full of white mealy substances. Yam bean infested with Ferrisia virgata
Later, the apical meristem and other growing parts
turned black. The young pods were curled inward
and blackened. The other infested parts also Lower number of infested pods per plant,
slowly blackened and dried. Dry weather due to higher number of uninfested pods/plant, seeds/
low rainfall, high relative humidity followed by pod, 100-seed weight, seed yield/plant, and
low relative humidity, and high variation in maxi- seed yield (kg/ha) were observed with the
mum and minimum temperatures (diurnal varia- application of two sprayings of acephate
tion) during the year 2011 might be responsible 0.03 % (spray uid 250 L/ha) (Nedunchezhiyan
for the outbreak of F. virgata on yam bean. et al. 2014).
(Nedunchezhiyan et al. 2014).
54 Tuber Crops 487

54.8 Enset the roots than the corms. Enset root mealybugs
were found up to a soil depth of 60 cm and up to
Presently, more than 12 million people in Ethiopia 80 cm from the corm. In addition, about 90 % of
depend on enset as a source of food. Its produc- the mealybugs were found within a 60 cm radius
tion is strongly hampered by the enset root from the plant (Addis, 2008).
mealybug Cataenococcus ensete (Williams and
Matile-Ferrero) in Ethiopia (Addis et al. 2008).
Enset plants infested with mealybugs have a 54.8.1 Management
retarded growth and dried lateral leaves. The
insects attack all plant age groups, but symptoms Repeated ploughing and sanitation of enset elds
are more severe on 2-to-4 years old enset plants. has also been reported as a control option for
Enset root mealybugs are found on roots and reducing enset root mealybug population num-
corms. Early infestations by root mealybugs can bers (Tadesse et al. 2003). Application of farm-
be easily overlooked, because they live under- yard manure (20 kg plant-1 year-1) resulted in
ground, and no visual symptoms will be observed vigorously growing plants with lower population
on the plant parts above the ground, until exten- numbers of enset root mealybugs (Anonymous
sive damage has been made to the roots and corm 2002). Among the insecticides tested, chloropyri-
(Hara et al. 2001). However, during periods of fos and diazinon have shown promising results
extreme drought, the mealybugs tend to move for its control and eradication (Tadesse 2006).
toward the corm when some of the roots drought. Soil drenching with diazinon 60 % EC and chlor-
The dispersal mechanism of enset root mealy- pyrifos 48 % EC caused at least 98 % mortality,
bugs is facilitated by the movement of infested both under eld and greenhouse conditions
suckers, farm implements during cultivation, (Tadesse et al. 2010). Still, cost-effective and
repeated transplanting operations, and associa- user-friendly control measures for the enset root
tion with ants. The population density of the mealybug have not yet been developed (Tadesse
mealybugs was signicantly (p < 0.05) higher on 2006) (Table 54.3).

Table 54.3 List of mealybugs recorded on tuber crops other than cassava
Crop and Mealybug
species Country Reference
Ipomoea batatas (Sweet potato)
Ferrisia virgata Guam IIse Schreiner (2000)
(Cockerell) Bangladesh http://www.aappbckv.org/journal/archive/6%20Sudden%
20outbreak% 20of% 20mealybug.pdf
Geococcus coffeae India David and Ananthakrishnan (2004)
(Green)
Maconellicoccus USA manatee.ifas.u.edu/comm-hort/pdf/pest-topics/InsectPHMHosts.pdf
hirsutus (Green)
Phenacoccus Ethiopia http://www.ppse.org.et/index.php?option=com_content&view=article
solenosis (Tinsley) &id=40:selonopsis-mealybug-phenacoccus-solenosis-tinsley-
hompotera-pseudococcidae-a-new-threat-to-cotton-production-in-
ethiopia&catid=7:-news&Itemid=3
(continued)
488 M. Mani et al.

Table 54.3 (continued)


Crop and Mealybug
species Country Reference
Paracoccus Texas Tarah Damask (http://homeguides.sfgate.com/causes-white-bumps-
marginatus (Williams sweet-potato-leaves-42692.html)
and Granara de Florida Walker et al. (2003)
Willink)
Palau Pest Alert ( 2003)
Ghana Cham et al. (2011)
Planococcus kenyae Africa http://www.infonet-biovision.org/default/ct/94/pests
(LePelley)
Planococcus minor Trinidad Francis et al. (2012)
(Maskell
Tannia (Xanthosoma sagittifolium (Schott))
Maconellicoccus The United manatee.ifas.u.edu/comm-hort/pdf/pest-topics/InsectPHMHosts.pdf
hirsutus (Green) States
Taro -Colocasia esculenta
Dysmicoccus brevipes Ben-Dov (1994)
(Cockerell)
Dysmicoccus The Philippines Williams (2004)
neobreipes
(Beardsley)
Ferrisia virgata http://www.plantwise.org/KnowledgeBank/Datasheet.
(Cockerell) aspx?dsid=23981
Geococcus coffeae Ben-Dov (1994)
(Green)
Maconellicoccus Trinidad http://www.ncipmc.org/phmb/elson.cen.umontreal.ca/revue/
hirsutus (Green) phyto/1999/v80/n2/706185ar.pdf
The United manatee.ifas.u.edu/comm-hort/pdf/pest-topics/InsectPHMHosts.pdf
States
Paracoccus Kerala Mani Chellappan et al. (2013)
marginatus (Williams
and Granara de
Willink)
Planococcus minor The United http://www.invasive.org/caps/host.cfm?host=5369
(Maskell) States
Trinidad Francis et al. (2012)
India Ben-Dov (1994);Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus The United http://www.plantwise.org/KnowledgeBank/Datasheet.
longispinus (Targioni States aspx?dsid=45079
Tozzetti) Africa http://www.infonet-biovision.org/default/ct/94/pests
India, Indonesia Williams (2004)
Rasrococcus invadens Ben-Dov (1994)
(Williams)
Rhizoecus India Williams (2004)
amorphophalli
(Betrem)
Yam (Dioscorea)
Maconellicoccus The United manatee.ifas.u.edu/comm-hort/pdf/pest-topics/InsectPHMHosts.pdf
hirsutus (Green) States
Planococcus Nigeria,West Ben-Dov (1994)
furcisetosus (Mamet) Indies
(continued)
54 Tuber Crops 489

Table 54.3 (continued)


Crop and Mealybug
species Country Reference
Planococcus halli Africa and the Cox and Wetton (1988)
(Ezzat and West Indies
McConnell) Florida https://edis.ifas.u.edu/in947
Planococcus minor Trinidad Francis et al. (2012)
(Maskell)
Planococcus kenyae Africa http://www.infonet-biovision.org/default/ct/94/pests
(Le Pelley)
Planococcus halli Ibadan, Nigeria Akinlosotu (1984)
(Ezzat and
McConnell)
Planococcus Solomon islands Ben-Dov (1994)
dioscoreae (Williams)
Rasrococcus invadens Malaysia Ben-Dov (1994);Williams (2004)
(Williams)
Rhizoecus India Williams (2004)
amorphophalli
(Betrem)
Elephant foot yam (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius)
Paracoccus Kerala, India Mani Chellappan et al. (2013)
marginatus (Williams
and Granara de
Willink)
Pseudococcus cryptus India Williams (2004)
(Hempel)
Rasrococcus India Williams (2004)
iceryoides (Green)
Enset (Ensete ventricosum)
Cataenococcus ensete Ethiopia Addis et al. (2008)
(Williams and
Matile-Ferrer)

Report Lunyangwa Agricultural Research Station.


References 1988/1989, pp 4144
Anonymous (2002) Awassa Agricultural Research Center
Addis T, Azerefegne F, Blomme G (2008) Density and progress report of plant protection research division
distribution of enset root mealybugs on enset. Afr for the year 2000. Awassa, Ethiopia, 46 p
Crop Sci J 16(1):6774 Atu UG, Okeke JE (1981a) Evaluation of insecticides for
Akinlosotu TA (1983) Studies on the control of the cas- control of cassava mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti).
sava mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti) and the green Trop Pest Manag 27(2):251253
spider mite (Monoychellus tanajoa) in south-western Atu UG, Okeke JE (1981b) Effect of insecticide applica-
Nigeria. J Root Crop 9(12):3343 tion on cassava yield in control of cassava mealybug
Akinlosotu TA (1984) Planococcus halli, a new mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti). Trop Pest Manag
pest of white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) at Moor 27(2):434435
plantation, Ibadan, Nigeria. J Root Crop Barnard PC, Brooks SJ (1984) The African lacewing
10(12):7173 genus Ceratochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): a
Anonymous (1985) Cassava clone resistant to mealybugs predator on the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus mani-
now being used in intensive breeding program in hoti (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Syst Entomol
Zaire. Research Highlights, International Institute of 9(4):359371
Tropical Agriculture, pp 4243 Beardsley JW (1978) Some thoughts on mealybugs and
Anonymous (1989) Cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus mealybug management. Proceedings of the
manihoti, management by chemical pesticides. Annual International Workshop on the cassava mealybug
490 M. Mani et al.

Phenacoccus manihoti Mat.-Ferr. (Pseudococcidae) crops (Manihot esculenta) and observations on some
held at INERA-Mvuazi, Bas-Zaire, Zaire, 2629 June of their natural enemies [Spanish]. Revista Colombiana
1977, pp 6569 de Entomologia 16(2):3343
Bellotti AC (1983) More on the mealybug: a major cas- Chakupurakal J, Markham RH, Neuenschwander P,
sava pest. Cassava Newslett 7(1):34 Sakala M, Malambo C, Mulwanda D, Banda E,
Bellotti A, Vargas HO (1991) Recent advances in host Chalabesa A, Bird T, Haug T (1994) Biological con-
plant resistance studies with whiteies and mealybugs trol of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti
on cassava at CIAT. Resist Pest Manag 3(2):17 (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in Zambia. Biol Control
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- 4(3):254262
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Chakupurakal J, Markham RH, Neuenschwander P,
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- Sakala M, Malambo C, Mulwanda D, Banda E,
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic Chalabesa A, Bird T, Haug T (1996) Biological con-
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p trol of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti
Ben-Dov Y, Miller DR, Gibson GAP (2012) ScaleNet: a (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in Zambia. IITA Res
database of the scale insects of the world. Available: 12:1925
http://www.sel.barc.usda.gov/scalenet/scalenet.htm. Cham D, Davis H, Obeng-Ofori D, Owusu E (2011) Host
Accessed 10 April 2012 Range of the Newly Invasive Mealybug Species
Bennett FD, Greathead DJ (1978) Biological control of Paracocccus marginatus Williams and Granara De
the mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero: Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Two
prospects and necessity. Carlos Lozano, J. In: Ecological Zones of Ghana. Res Zool 1(1):17
Proceedings cassava protection workshop CIAT, Cali, Chellappan M, Lince L, Indhu P, Cherian T, Anitha S,
Colombia, 712 November, 1977, pp 181194 Jimcymaria T (2013) Host range and distribution pat-
Bento JMS, de Moraes GJ, Bellotti AC, Castillo JA, tern of papaya mealy bug, Paracoccus marginatus
Warumby JF, Lapointe SL (1999) Introduction of par- Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera:
asitoids for the control of the cassava mealybug Pseudococcidae) on selected Euphorbiaceae hosts in
Phenacoccus herreni (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Kerala. J Trop Agric 51(12):5159
north-eastern Brazil. Bull Entomol Res Cox JM, Wetton MN (1988) Identication of the mealy-
89(5):403410 bug Planococcus halli Ezzat & McConnell
Bento JMS, de Moraes GJ, de Matos AP, Bellotti AC (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) commonly occurring on
(2000) Classical biological control of the mealybug yams (Dioscorea spp.) in Africa and the West Indies.
Phenacoccus herreni (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Bull Entomol Res 78:561571
northeastern Brazil. Environ Entomol 29(2):355359 Cox JM, Williams DJ (1981) An account of cassava
Borowka R, Neuenschwander P, Hummel HE (1997) mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) with a
Reaction of two cassava cultivars to cassava mealybug description of a new species. Bull Entomol Res
attack under conditions favoring high pest infestation 71(2):247258
in Malawi. Mededelingen Faculteit Cudjoe AR, Neuenschwander P, Copland MJW (1992)
Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Experimental determination of the efciency of indig-
Wetenschappen, Universiteit Gent 62(2a):289299 enous and exotic natural enemies of the cassava
Boussienguet J, Neuenschwander P, Herren HR (1991) mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti Mat.-Ferr. (Hom.,
Experiments on the biological control of the cassava Pseudococcidae) in Ghana. J Appl Entomol
mealybug in Gabon: I. Establishment and dispersal 114(1):7782
of the exotic parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi (Hym.: David BV, Ananthakrishnan TN (2004) General and
Encyrtidae) and competitive displacement of local Applied Entomology. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing,
parasitoids. Entomophaga 36(3):455469 New Delhi, 1184p
Calatayud PA, Le R BP (2006) Cassava-Mealybug Delalibera I Jr, Humber RA, Bento JMS, de Matos AP
Interactions. IRD ditions, Paris, 110 p (1997) First record of the entomopathogenic fungus
Calatayud PA, Seligmann CD, Polania MA, Bellotti AC Neozygites fumosa on the cassava mealybug
(2001) Inuence of parasitism by encyrtid parasitoids Phenacoccus herreni. J Invertebr Pathol
on the feeding behaviour of the cassava mealybug 69(3):276278
Phenacoccus herreni. Entomologia Experimentalis et Divya S (2012) Studies on management of papaya mealy-
Applicata 98(3):271278 bug Paracoccus marginatus (Williams and Granara de
Carrejo GNS, Bellotti AC, Gonzalez OR (1991) Willink) (Pseudococcidae:Hemiptera). Thesis submit-
Evaluation of some determining factors in the ef- ted to the TamilNadu agricultural university. TNAU,
ciency of Cleothera notata (Col: Coccinellidae) as Coimbatore
predator of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus her- Dorn B, Mattiacci L, Bellotti AC, Dorn S (2003a) Effects
reni (Hom: Pseudococcidae) [Spanish]. Revista of a mixed species infestation on the cassava mealy-
Colombiana de Entomologia 17(1):2127 bug and its encyrtid parasitoids. Biol Control
Castillo J, Bellotti AC (1990) Diagnostic characters of 27(1):110
four mealybug species (Pseudococcidae) in cassava
54 Tuber Crops 491

Dorn B, Mattiacci L, Bellotti AC, Dorn S (2003b) Host Hennessey RD, Muaka T (1987) Field biology of the cas-
specicity and daytime activity of parasitoids of the sava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti and its natural
Latin American cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus her- enemies in Zaire. Insect Sci Appl 8(46):899903
reni (Sternorrhyncha: Pseudococcidae). Mitteilungen Hennessey RD, Neuenschwander P, Muaka T (1990)
der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft Spread and current distribution of the cassava mealy-
76(3/4):293300 bug, Phenacoccus manihoti (Homoptera:
Ezumah HC, Knight A (1978) Some notes on the mealy- Pseudococcidae), in Zaire. Trop Pest Manag
bug (Phenacoccus manihoti Mat.-Ferr.) incidence on 36(2):103107
manioc (Manihot esculenta) in Bas-Zaire. In: Herren HR, Neuenschwander P, Hennessey RD,
Proceedings of the International Workshop on the cas- Hammond WNO (1987) Introductions and dispersal
sava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Mat.-Ferr. of Epidinocarsis lopezi (Hym., Encyrtidae), an exotic
(Pseudococcidae) held at INERA-Mvuazi, Bas-Zaire, parasitoid of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus
Zaire, 2629 June 1977, pp 714 manihoti (Hom., Pseudococcidae), in Africa. Agric
Fabres G (1981) Bioecology of the cassava mealybug Ecosyst Environ 19(2):131144
(Phenacoccus manihoti Hom. Pseudococcidae) in the Iheagwam EU (1981) Natural enemies and alternative
Peoples Republic of Congo. II -- Variations in abun- hostplant of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus
dance and regulation factors. [French]. Agronomie manihoti (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae) in south-
Tropicale 36(4):369377 eastern Nigeria. Revue de Zoologie Africaine
Francis MA, Kairo WTK, Roda AL, Oscar E, Liburd OE, 95(2):433438
Polar P (2012) The passionvine mealybug, IIse Schreiner (2000) Striped mealybug Ferrisia virgata
Planococcus minor (Maskell) (Hemiptera: (Cockrell). Agricultural pests of the Pacic ADAP
Pseudococcidae), and its natural enemies in the cocoa 200-18Reissued August 2000ISBN1-931415-21-9.
agroecosystem in Trinidad. Biol Control 60:290296 http://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/adap/Publications/
Galanihe LD, Jayasundera MUP, Vithana A, ADAP_pubs/2000-18.pdf
Asselaarachchi N, Watson GW (2010) Occurrence, James BD (1987) The cassava mealybug Phenacoccus
distribution and control of papaya mealybug, manihoti Mat-Ferr (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in
Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), Sierra Leone: a survey. Trop Pest Manag 33(1):6166
an invasive alien pest in Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res Ext Kiyindou A, le Ru B, Fabres G (1990) The inuence of
13(3):8186 the nature and abundance of prey on the numerical
Giga DP (1994) First record of the cassava mealybug, response of two coccinellids preying on the cassava
Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero (Homoptera: mealybug in Congo [French]. Entomophaga
Pseudococcidae) from Zimbabwe. Afr Entomol 35(4):611620
2(2):184185 Korada RR, Naskar SK, Edison S (2010) Insect pests and
Greathead DJ (1978) Biological control of mealybugs their management in yam production and storage: a
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) with special reference world review. Int J Pest Manag 56(4):337349
to cassava mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti Mat- le Ru B (1986) Epizootiology of the fungus Neozygites
Ferr.). In: Proceedings of the International Workshop fumosa (Zygomycetes, Entomophthorales) in a
on the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Mat.- population of cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus mani-
Ferr. (Pseudococcidae) held at INERA-Mvuazi, Bas- hoti (Hom.: Pseudococcidae) [French]. Entomophaga
Zaire, Zaire, June 2629, 1977, pp 7080 31(1):7989
Gutierrez AP, Neuenschwander P, Schulthess F, Herren le Ru B, Fabres G (1987) Inuence of temperature and
HR, Baumgaertner JU, Wermelinger B, Lohr B, Ellis relative humidity on the capacity for increase and pop-
CK (1988) Analysis of biological control of cassava ulation dynamics of the cassava mealybug,
pests in Africa. II. Cassava mealybug Phenacoccus Phenacoccus manihoti (Hom. Pseudococcidae), in the
manihoti. J Appl Ecol 25(3):921940 Congo [French]. Acta Oecologica, Oecologia
Hammond WNO, Neuenschwander P (1990) Sustained Applicata 8(2):165174
biological control of the cassava mealybug le Ru B, Iziquel Y (1990a) New observations on the epi-
Phenacoccus manihoti (Hom.: Pseudococcidae) by zootiology of Neozygites fumosa in populations of the
Epidinocarsis lopezi (Hym.: Encyrtidae) in Nigeria. cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti [French].
Entomophaga 35(4):515526 Entomophaga 35(2):173183
Hammond WNO, Neuenschwander P, Herren HR (1987) le Ru B, Iziquel Y (1990b) An experimental study, with
Impact of the exotic parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi on the aid of a rain simulator, of the mechanical effect of
cassava mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti) popula- rainfall on populations of the cassava mealybug,
tions. Insect Sci Appl 8(46):887891 Phenacoccus manihoti. [French]. Acta Oecol
Hara AH, Nino-Duponte RY, Jacobsen CM (2001) Root 11(5):741754
mealybugs of quarantine signicance in Hawaii. le Ru B, Makosso JPM (2001) Prey habitat location by the
Cooperative Extension Service, CTAHR, university of cassava mealybug predator Exochomus aviventris:
Hawaii, Manoa. IP-6, 4 p olfactory responses to odor of plant, mealybug, plant-
492 M. Mani et al.

mealybug complex, and plant-mealybug-natural Phenacoccus manihoti (Hom. Pseudococcidae).


enemy complex. J Insect Behav 14(5):557572 J Appl Entomol 121(4):231236
Lema KM, Herren HR (1985) Release and establishment Mtambo K (1995) The current situation of cassava mealy-
in Nigeria of Epidinocarsis lopezi, a parasitoid of the bug and its natural enemy in Tanzania. Res Train
cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti. Newsl (Dar es Salaam) 10(1/4):1718
Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata Muniappan R, Meyerdirk DE, Sengebau FM, Berringer
38(2):171175 DD, Reddy GVP (2006) Classical biological control
Lit IL Jr, Calilung VJ, Villacarlos LT (1990) Notes on of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus
mealybugs and scale insects (Coccoidea, Hemiptera) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the Republic of
of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Philipp Palau. Florida Entomol 89:212217
Entomol 8(1):707708 Muniappan R, Shepard BM, Watson GW, Carner GR,
Lohr B, Varela AM, Santos B (1990) Exploration for nat- SartiamI D, Rauf A, Hammig MD (2008) First report
ural enemies of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus
manihoti (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), in South (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), in Indonesia and India.
America for the biological control of this introduced J Agric Urb Entomol 25(1):3740
pest in Africa. Bull Entomol Res 80(4):417425 Muniappan R, Shepard BM, Watson GW, Carner GR,
Mani Chellappan (2011) Impact of Acerophagous papa- Rauf A (2009) New Records of Invasive Insects
yae Noyes and Schauffon Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha) in Southeast Asia and
Williams and Granara de Willink in Kerala. In: West Africa. J Agric Urban Entomol 26:167174
Proceedings of the National consulation meeting on Nedunchezhiyan M, Jata SK, Ray RC, Misra RS (2011)
strategies for deployment and impact of the imported Management OF mealybug (Rhizoecus amorpho-
parasitoids of papaya mealybug, Classical biological phalli) in elephant foot yam (Amorphophallus paeoni-
control of papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) ifolius). Exp Agric 47(4):717728
in India, pp.82-83 Nedunchezhiyan M, Jata SK, Misra RS (2014). Climate
Mastoi MI, Azura AN, Muhammad R, Idris AB, Ibrahim change inicts stripped mealybug (Ferrisia virgata)
Y (2011) First report of papaya mealybug Paracoccus invasion on yam bean (Pachyrrhizus erosus) and its
marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from management. Indian J Agric Sci (In Press)
Malaysia. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 5(7):12471250 Neuenschwander P, Hammond WNO (1988) Natural
Matile-Ferrero D (1978) Cassava mealybug in the enemy activity following the introduction of
Peoples Republic of Congo. In: Proceedings of the Epidinocarsis lopezi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae)
international workshop on the cassava mealybug against the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti
Phenacoccus manihoti Mat.-Ferr. (Pseudococcidae) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in southwestern
held at INERA-Mvuazi, Bas-Zaire, Zaire, June Nigeria. Environ Entomol 17(5):894902
2629, 1977, pp 2946 Neuenschwander P, Hammond WNO, Gutierrez AP,
Milena Varela A, Belloti AC, Reyes JA (1982) Biology Cudjoe AR, Adjakloe R, Baumgartner JU, Regev U
and ecology of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus (1989) Impact assessment of the biological control of
gossypii Townsend & Cockerell (Homoptera: the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti
Pseudococcidae). Revista Colombiana de Entomologia Matile-Ferrero (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), by the
5(1/2):915 introduced parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi (De Santis)
Miller DR, Miller GL (2002) Redescription of Paracoccus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Bull Entomol Res
marginatus Williams, D. J. and Granara de Willink, 79(4):579594
(Homoptera:Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), including Neuenschwander P, Borowka R, Phiri G, Hammans H,
descriptions of the Immature Stages and Adult Male. Nyirenda S, Kapeya EH, Gadabu A (1991) Biological
Proc Entomol Soc Wash 104(1):123 control of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus mani-
Minko DO, Bekon AK (2005) Study of insect fauna asso- hoti (Hom., Pseudococcidae) by Epidinocarsis lopezi
ciated to the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti (Hym., Encyrtidae) in Malawi. Biocontrol Sci Tech
Matile-Ferrero in Ivory Coast [French]. Tropicultura 1(4):297310
23(3):136140 Noyes JS (1984) A new genus and species of encyrtid
Misra S, Korada RR, Mishra B (2013) Thermomediated (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) parasitic on the cassava
activity of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero
(Coleoptera:Coccinellidae) predating on mealybug (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Bull Entomol Res
Rhizoecus amorphophalli Bertem 74(3):529533
(Hemiptera:Rhozoecinae) on elephant foot yam. Nwanze KF (1982) Relationships between cassava root
J Biol Control 27(3):225228 yields and crop infestations by the mealybug,
Morse S, Acholo M, McNamara N, Oliver R (2000) Phenacoccus manihoti. Int J Pest Manag 28:2732
Control of storage insects as a means of limiting yam Nweke FI (2010) Controlling cassava mosaic virus and
tuber fungal rots. J Stored Prod Res 36:3745 cassava mealybug in sub-Saharan Africa. Proven suc-
Mourier M (1997) Effects of neem (Azadirachta indica) cesses in agricultural development: a technical com-
kernel water extracts on cassava mealybug, pendium to Millions Fed, pp 99121
54 Tuber Crops 493

Nyirenda GKC (1988) Incidence, ecology and control of Sakthivel N (2013) Field performance of three exotic para-
the cassava mealybug in Malawi. Enhancing the con- sitoids against papaya mealybug, Paracoccus margin-
tribution of cassava to food security in SADCC, atus (Williams and Granara de Willink) infesting
Mzuzu, Malawi, 28 November-2 December 1988, cassava in Tamil Nadu.J. Biol Control 27(3):8387
pp 277294 Sakthivel N, Qadri SMH (2010) Incidence of papaya
Odebiyi JA, Bokonon-Ganta AH (1986) Biology of mealybug on tapioca in Tamil Nadu. Indian Silk
Epidinocarsis (=Apoanagyrus) lopezi (Hymenoptera: 1(56):89
Encyrtidae) an exotic parasite of cassava mealybug, Schulthess F, Baumgartner JU, Delucchi V, Gutierrez AP
Phenacoccus manihoti (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) (1991) The inuence of the cassava mealybug,
in Nigeria. Entomophaga 31(3):251260 Phenacoccus manihoti Mat.-Ferr. (Hom.
Palaniswami MS (1999) Major pests of tropical tuber Pseudococcidae) on yield formation of cassava,
crops and their management. In: Upadhyay RR, Manihot esculenta Crantz. J Appl Entomol
Mukherjee KG, Dubey OP (eds) IPM system in 111(2):155165
Agriculture. Vol. VI. Aditya Books Ltd., New Delhi Shylesha AN, Sunil Joshi (2012) Occurrence of Madeira
Palaniswami MS, Pillai KS (1989) Investigation on yield mealybug Phenacoccus madeirensis Green
loss due to pest damage in taro in India. J Root Crop (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on cotton in India and
15:109114 record of assiaciated parasitoids. J Biol Control
Palaniswami MS, Pillai KS, Abraham K (1982) Occurance 26(3):272273
of Ferrisia virgata on Dioscorea dumetorum. J Root Shylesha AN, Rabindra RJ, Bhumannavar BS (2011) The
Crop 8:6970 papaya mealybug Paracoccus marginatus
Pantoja A, Abreu E, Pena J, Robles W (2007) Paracoccus (Coccoidea:Pseudococcidae). In: Proceedings of the
marginatus Williams and Gra, nara de Willink National consulation meeting on strategies for deploy-
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) affecting papaya in ment and impact of the imported parasitoids of papaya
Puerto Rico. J Agric Univ P R 91(3/4):223225 mealybug classical biological control of papaya
Parsa S, Kondo T, Winotai A (2012) The Cassava mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) in India, pp 18
Mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti) in Asia: First Sullivan DJ, Castillo JA, Bellotti AC (1991) Comparative
Records, Potential Distribution, and an Identication biology of six species of coccinellid beetles
Key. PLoS One 7(10), e47675. doi:10.1371/journal. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) predaceous on the mealy-
pone.0047675 bug, Phenacoccus herreni (Homoptera:
Paul Cox T (2010) Thailand brings in wasps to save cas- Pseudococcidae), a pest of cassava in Colombia, South
sava industry http://www.new-ag.info/en/develop- America. Environ Entomol 20(2):685689
ments/devItem.php?a=1741 Tadesse E (2006) Evaluation of some synthetic and botan-
Pedigo LP (1999) Entomology and pest management, 3 ical insecticides against the enset root mealybug
edn, Prentice-Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River, 23,691 p (Cataenococcus ensete) (homoptera: pseudococcidae)
Pegoraro RA, Bellotti AC (1994) Biological aspects of William and Matile-Fererro in Southern Ethiopia.
Pseudococcus mandio Williams (Homoptera: MSc thesis, Department of plant sciences, Awassa col-
Pseudococcidae) in cassava [Portuguese]. Anais da lege of agriculture, School of Graduate Studies
Sociedade Entomologica do Brasil 23(2):203207 Hawassa University Awassa, Ethiopia, 67 p
Pest Alert (2003) Papaya Mealybug, Paracoccus margin- Tadesse M, Anito E, Geta E (2003) Enset- Based Farming
atus, in Palau, ISSN 17278473. (le:///C:/ Systems of Masha wereda, Shaka zone. EARO
Documents%20and%20Settings/user/My%20 Research report no. 51. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 25 p
Documents/Downloads/Bat_PA_PestAlertNo31%20 Tadesse E, Azerefegne F, Alemu T, Blomme G, Addis T
Papaya%20mealybug%20. (2010) The effect of insecticides against the root
Pijls JWAM, Van Alphen JJM (1996) On the coexistence mealybug (Cataenococcus ensete) of ensete ventrico-
of the cassava mealybug parasitoids Apoanagyrus sum in Southern Ethiopia. (Special Issue: Bananas,
diversicornis and A. lopezi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) plantains and enset II.) Tree and Forestry Science and.
in their native South America. Bull Entomol Res Biotechnology 4(2):9597
86(1):5159 Tertuliano M, Le Dossou-Gbete S, Ru B (1993)
Rajamma P, Jayaprakas CA, Palaniswami MS (2002) Bio- Antixenotic and antibiotic components of resistance to
ecology of storage pests and theirnatural enemies in the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti
aroids and yams. In: Annual Report. Central Tuber (Homoptera: pseudococcidae) in various host-plants.
Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, Insect Sci Appl 14(5):657665
pp 20012002, 54p Umeh EDNN (1983) Towards a biological control of cas-
Reyd G, le Ru B (1992) Impact of predation by coccinel- sava mealybug: Phenacoccus manihoti Mat.-Ferr.
lid larvae on colonies of the mealybug Phenacoccus (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae). Revue de Zoologie
manihoti in crop lands. Acta Oecol 13(2):181191 Africaine 97(1):6064
Saengyotl S, Burikam I (2011) Host Plants and Natural Van Driesche RG, Bellotti AC, CastilloJ HCJ (1990)
Enemies of Papaya Mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Estimating total losses from parasitoids for a eld
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Thailand. Thai population of a continuously breeding insect, cassava
J Agric Sci 44(3):197205 mealybug, Phenacoccus herreni (Homoptera:
494 M. Mani et al.

Pseudococcidae) in Colombia, S.A. Fla Entomol Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
73(1):133143 Natural History Museum, London, 896
Vasquez EA, Buyser MA (2007) Post harvest Losses in Williams DJ, Granara de Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs
Greater Yam (Dioscorea alata L.) due to insect pests. of Central and South America. CAB International,
J Root Crop 33(2):114118 London, 635 p
Vijay S (2010) Management of papaya mealybug in cassava. Winotai A, Goergen G, Tam M, Neuenschwander P
(http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp- (2010) Cassava mealybug has reached Asia. Biocontrol
sci-tech-and-agri/management-of-papaya-mealybug-in- News Inf 31:10N11N. doi:10.1017/
cassava/article464560.ece s0007485300050677
Walker A, Hoy M, Meyerdirk DE (2003) Papaya Wu SA, Wang YP (2011) Precaution of cassava mealy-
Mealybug. Univ. Florida Featured Crea-tures. http:// bug, Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero in China.
creatures.ifas.u.edu/fruit/mealybugs/papa J Environ Entomol 33:122125
Williams DJ (1978) Taxonomy of mealybugs on cassava. Zeddies J, Schaab RP, Neuenschwander P, Herren HR
In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on the (2001) Economics of biological control of cassava
cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Mat.-Ferr. mealybug in Africa. Agric Econ 24(2):209219
(Pseudococcidae) held at INERA-Mvuazi, Bas-Zaire,
Zaire, June 2629, 1977, pp 4752
Ornamental Plants
55
V. Sridhar, L.S. Vinesh, and M. Mani

Mealybugs are worldwide pests of ornamental citri (Risso), Phenacoccus solani Tinsley and
plants grown indoors and outdoors. Both green- Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de
house and open cultivated grown ornamentals are Willink are some of the important mealybugs
commonly attacked by different mealybugs. In recorded on this crop.
recent years, mealy bugs have become an increasing
threat to the cultivation of several ornamentals in
India (Jhansi Rani 2001; Mani and Krishnamoorthy 55.1.1 Maconellicoccus hirsutus
2003). Mealybug infestation reduces vigour and
growth of the foliage which reduces the beauty of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis is a preferred and eco-
ornamental plant and affects marketability (Hamlen nomically important host of M. hirsutus also
1975). Mealybugs are a quarantine problem on popularly known as pink hibiscus mealybug
exported foliage and owers. Mealybugs cost grow- (PHMB), and is considered as a prolic pest that
ers and retailers millions of dollars per year in con- injects a toxin at the point of feeding, causing
trol costs and crop damage (Gullan and Kosztarab severe distortion of leaves and stunted growth
1997). An exhaustive list of mealybugs on various (Vitullo et al. 2009). Severe outbreak of M. hirsu-
ornamentals from different parts of the world has tus was noticed on ornamentals around Cairo in
been documented by Mattiuz et al. (2006), Cham 1920. Biological control is the best option for the
et al. (2011) and Arif et al. (2009) (Table 55.1). suppression of the pink hibiscus mealybug. The
parasitoid Anagyrus kamali Moursi and
Australian ladybird beetle, Cryptolaemus mon-
55.1 Hibiscus trouzieri Musant are the best-known natural ene-
mies to keep PHMB under check. Anagyrus
The greatest mealybug host diversity is found in kamali has been reported to be an outstanding
Hibiscus spp. Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green), natural enemy in Egypt, Hawaii, Caribbean
Coccidohystrix insolita (Green), Planococcus islands and Florida, and is able to dramatically
suppress pink hibiscus mealybug populations.
The introduction of C. montrouzieri was facili-
V. Sridhar (*) L.S. Vinesh M. Mani
tated by India into Caribbean islands to control
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India M. hirsutus on several ornamental plants includ-
e-mail: vsridhar@iihr.ernet.in ing hibiscus (Gautam 2003).

Springer India 2016 495


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_55
496

Table 55.1 List of some mealybugs recorded on different ornamental plants


Mealybug species Host plant Region/country Reference
Chaetococcus Ornamental bamboo Florida Hodges and Hodges (2004)
bambusae (Maskell)
Delottococcus Protea, Leucospermum Portugal Passarinho et al. (2006); Leandro et al. (2006)
confusus (De Lotto)
Dysmicoccus boninsis Canna Ben-Dov (1994)
(Kuwana)
Dysmicoccus Heliconia Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
mackenziei Beardsley
Exallomochlus Hibiscus Malaysia Williams (2004)
hispidus (Morrison)
Ferrisia virgata Ornamentals Philippines Lapis (1970)
(Cockerell) Bauhinia purpurea India Mani (2008)
Sida rhombifolia India Kumar and Sheela (2002)
Croton, Dracaena http://www.plantwise.org/KnowledgeBank/Datasheet.aspx?dsid=23981
Ixora India Williams (2004)
Acalypha bicolor, Codiaeum India Vijay and Suresh (2013); Ben-Dov (1994); Suresh and Mohanasundaram (1996)
variegatum & Nerium
Croton, Dracaena http://www.plantwise.org/KnowledgeBank/Datasheet.aspx?dsid=23981
Durantha India Sakthivel et al. (2012)
Acalypha bicolor India Vijay and Suresh (2013)
Ferrisia virgata Hibiscus, Crotons & Ben-Dov (1994)
(Cockerell) Gladiolus India Williams (2004)
Geococcus coffeae Nerium, Canna Ben-Dov (1994)
Green Coleus India Williams (2004)
Canna Malaysia Williams (2004)
Heliococcus danzigae Rose Palaearctic region Ben-Dov (1994)
Bazarov
Hypogeococcus Aster New York Ben-Dov (1994)
barbarae Rau
Hypogeococcus Cacti Puerto Rico, Caribbean Helmuth et al. (2010)
pungens Granara de and Mexico
Willink
V. Sridhar et al.
Mealybug species Host plant Region/country Reference
Lankacoccus ornatus Jasmine India Williams (2004)
(Green)
Maconellicoccus Ornamental plants Caribbean islands Matile-Ferrero and Etienne (1996)
hirsutus (Green) Alpinia purpurata, Caribbean islands Etienne et al. (1998)
Allamanda cathartica
Ornamental plants Mexico Gonzalez-Gaona et al. (2010)
Ornamental trees California Castle and Prabhaker (2011)
55 Ornamental Plants

Nerium, Acalypha, Bauhinia, Egypt Hall (1920)


Cassia & Clerodentron
Allamanda, Angelica, Florida http://entnemdept.u.edu/creatures/orn/mealybug/mealybug.htm
Anthurium, Croton,
Bougainvillea, lily, Heliconia,
Ixora Hibiscus & oleander
Clitoria & Crotalaria, Ben-Dov (1994)
Clerodendron & Hibiscus India Williams (2004)
Hibiscus Indonesia, Malaysia, Williams (2004)
Philippines & Thailand
Nipaecoccus Clerodendron Ben-Dov (1994)
lamentosus
(Cockerell)
Nipaecoccus nipae Canna & Redginger Ben-Dov (1994)
(Makell)
Nipaecoccus viridis Nerium oleander India David and Ananthakrishnan (2004)
(Newstead) Alcea rosea, Asparagus, http://www.plantwise.org/KnowledgeBank/Datasheet.aspx?dsid=36335
Clerodendrum, Euphorbia &
Nerium
Clerodendron Malaysia Williams (2004)
Palmicultor Ornamental bamboo Florida Hodges and Hodges (2004)
lumpurensis
(Takahashi)
Paracoccus burnerae Hibiscus Ethiopian region Ben-Dov (1994)
(Brain)
(continued)
497
Table 55.1 (continued)
498

Mealybug species Host plant Region/country Reference


Paracoccus Crotons Kenya Ben-Dov (1994)
kajiadoensis (De
Lotto)
Paracoccus Amaranthus, Allamanda, India Chellappan et al. (2013)
marginatus Williams Nerium, Plumeria,
and Granara de Anthurium, Tagetes, Zinnia,
Willink Tecoma, Codiaeum, Jatropha
& Michelia
Adiantum, Caesalpinia, India Selvaraju and Sakthivel (2011)
Codiaeum, Euphorbia,
Hibiscus, Plumeria,
Taberbaemontana, Vinca,
Crossandra
Plumeria, Acalypha, Ghana Cham et al. (2011)
Codiaeum, Jatropha,
Euphorbia, Nerium,
Allamanda, Cassia, Hibiscus,
Malvaviscus, Lagerstroemia
& Plumbago
Hibiscus Florida Walker et al. (2003); Miller and Miller (2002)
Sri Lanka Galanihe et al. (2010)
Malaysia Mastoi et al. (2011)
Puerto Rico Pantoja et al. (2007)
Indonesia Muniappan et al. (2008)
Hawaii Ronald et al. (2007)
Palau Muniappan et al. (2006)
Indonesia Muniappan et al. (2008)
Guam Meyerdirk et al. (2004)
Durantha plumeri India Sakthivel et al. (2012)
Paraputo jasmini (De Jasmine Kenya Ben-Dov (1994)
Lotto)
Peliococcus Chrysanthemum Italy, Sweden Ben-Dov (1994)
manifectus
Borchsenius
V. Sridhar et al.
Mealybug species Host plant Region/country Reference
Phenacoccus Lotus California Ben-Dov (1994)
artemisiae Ehrhorn
Phenacoccus asteri Aster Taiwan Ben-Dov (1994)
Borchsenius
Phenacoccus Hibiscus, Acalypha, Tagetes India Vijay and Suresh (2013)
madeirensis Green & Codiaeum
Hibiscus Ben-Dov (1994)
55 Ornamental Plants

Chrysanthemum USA Chong et al. (2003)


Alcea rosea Mauritius Williams and Matile-Ferrero (2008)
Acalypha & Hibiscus Nigeria Akintola and Ande (2009)
Acalypha bicolor India Vijay and Suresh (2013)
Gerberra, crotons, Aster Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus Ornamental rubber & Nigeria Iheagwam (1981)
manihoti Manihot glaziovii
Matile-Ferrero Hibiscus China Wu et al. (2010)
Phenacoccus avenae Ornamental bulbs Netherlands Hofker et al. (1991)
Borchsenius
Phenacoccus defectus Echeveria spp. Britain Malumphy (1997)
Ferris
Phenacoccus Cestrum nocturnum India Shylesa and Sunil Joshi (2012)
madeirensis Green
Phenacoccus parvus Clerodendron Ben-Dov (1994)
Morrison Cestrum diurnum Florida Williams and Hamon (1994)
Chrysanthemum India Williams (2004)
Phenacoccus pumilus Dianthus Ben-Dov (1994)
Kritshenko
Phenacoccus Atraphaxis sp. Iran Moghaddam and Alikhani (2010)
salviacus Moghaddam
(continued)
499
500

Table 55.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Host plant Region/country Reference
Phenacoccus solani Hibiscus rosasinensis India Vijay and Suresh (2013)
Ferris Ornamentals Florida Hamlen (1975)
Durantha India Selvaraju and Sakthivel (2011)
Aster Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus Nerium, Chrysanthemum, India Vijay and Suresh (2013); Nagrare et al. (2009); Saini et al. (2009); Vennila et al.
solenopsis Tinsley Helianthus, Tagetes, (2012)
Euphorbia, Croton,
Asparagus, Hibiscus,
Clerodendron, Duranta,
Althaea, Celosia, Rose
Crossandra, Salvia
Gomphrena, Acalypha,
Codiaeum, Lawsonia &
Bougainvillea
Celosia, Polyalthia, Pakistan Arif et al. (2009)
Tabernaemontana, Calendula,
Aphelandra, Nerium,
Plumeria, Chrysanthemum,
Tagetes, Tecoma, Cassia,
Quisqualis, Setcreasia,
Ipomoea cairica, Acalypha,
Croton, Lagerstroemia,
Hibiscus, Malvaviscus,
Bougainvillea, Jasmine,
Rose, Gardenia, Hamelia,
Cestrum, Clerodendron &
Duranta
Acalypha & Hibiscus Nigeria Akintola and Ande (2009)
Planococcoides Clerodendron Ben-Dov (1994)
nijalensis (Laing)
V. Sridhar et al.
Mealybug species Host plant Region/country Reference
Planococcus citri Coleus & Philodendron Texas Chandler (1980)
(Risso) Greenhouse ornamentals Bulgaria Tsalev (1970)
Kalanchos blossfeldiana Shanghai Tang et al.(1992)
Coleus California Lain et al.(2004)
Glasshouse ornamentals Poland Labanowski (2009)
Alpinia purpurata Hara et al.(1997)
55 Ornamental Plants

Codiaeum & Gardenia Bangladesh Ullah and Parveen (1993)


Rose Lain and Parrella (2004)
Nerium,Philodendron, Ben-Dov (1994)
Stephanitis, Canna,
Acalypha, Crotons,
Bogainvillea & Jasmine
Clerodendron Thailand, Vietnam Williams (2004)
Ixora India Williams (2004)
Planococcus cus Ornamentals Bulgaria Pencheva and Gerasimova (2006)
(Signoret)
Planococcus Nerium Ben-Dov (1994)
furcisetosus Mamet
Planococcus Rhododendron Ben-Dov (1994)
japonicus Cox
Planococcus Nerium Taiwan, China & Japan Ben-Dov (1994)
kraunhiae (Kuwana)
Planococcus lilacinus Rhododendron Ben-Dov (1994)
(Cockrell) Gladiolus India Williams (2004)
Planococcus minor Acalypha, Red ginger Ben-Dov (1994)
(Maskell) Crotons, Canna, Plumeria India Williams (2004)
Clerodendron Malaysia & Thailand Williams (2004)
Planococcus vovae Juniperus communis Poland Golan and Jaskiewicz (2002)
(Nasonov)
(continued)
501
502

Table 55.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Host plant Region/country Reference
Polystomophora Atraphaxis sp. and P. Iran Moghaddam and Alikhani (2010)
arakensis salviacus
Moghaddam
Pseudococcus Greenhouse ornamentals Bulgaria Tsalev (1970)
adonidum (L.)
Pseudococcus Ornamentals Bulgaria Pencheva and Gerasimova (2006)
calceolariae (Green). Nerium, Rhododendron & Ben-Dov (1993)
Rose
Pseudococcus Clivia miniata Beijing Dong (1993)
comstocki (Kuwana) Ornamental trees Korea Kwon GiMyon et al. (2002)
Syringa China Cheng Hong and Yan ShanChum (2011)
Rhododendron Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus sp. Ornamental palms Cuba Rivero Aragon et al. (2000)
Pseudococcus cryptus Pistacia & Nerium Israel Ben-Dov (1993)
Hempel Crotons Philippines Williams (2004)
Dendrobium Singapore Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus Nerium, Jasmine, Cordyline, India Shylesha (2013); Mani et al. (2013)
jackbeardsley Gimpel Streptocarpus, Jasmine &
and Miller Chrysanthemum
Aglaonema, Hibiscus, Hawaii Beardsley (1986)
Dieffenbachia, Red ginger
V. Sridhar et al.
Mealybug species Host plant Region/country Reference
Pseudococcus Draceana sp. Mari et al. (2007)
longispinus (Targ) Ornamental plants Alexandria El-Minshawy et al. (1974)
Ornamentals Florida Hamlen (1975)
Ornamental species Israel Wysoki et al (1977)
Polyscias, Pachira, Dracaena Korean Peninsula Kwon GiMyon et al. (2002)
Glasshouse ornamental Poland Labanowski (2009)
potted plants
55 Ornamental Plants

Cycad & Phormium tenax California, USA Lain et al. (2004)


Ornamental plants Craiova Tuca et al. (2010)
Jasmine Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
Nerium, Plumeria Malaysia Williams (2004)
Hibiscus Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus Hibiscus, Crotalaria, Kirbati & Marshall Ben-Dov (1994)
neomaritimus Acalypha islands
Beardsley
Pseudococcus Greenhouse ornamentals Bulgaria Tsalev (1970)
maritimus (Ehrh.) Howeia forsteriana Hungary Ordogh and Takacs (1983)
Glasshouse ornamentals Poland Labanowski (2009)
Gladiolus Brazil Paiva et al. (2005)
Pseudococcus occidus Nerium Ethiopian Ben-Dov (1994)
De Lotto
Pseudococcus Heliconia New Zealand and Pacic Ben-Dov(1994)
orchidicola Takshashi region
Pseudococcus viburni Pittosporum, Hoya carnosa Italy Tranfaglia (1972/73)
(Signoret) Plant families (especially California, USA Lain et al. (2004)
Liliaceae and Iridaceae)
Jasmine Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus Hibiscus Caroline islands Ben-Dov (1994)
trukensis Bearsley
(continued)
503
504

Table 55.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Host plant Region/country Reference
Puto barberi Woody ornamental plants Las Palmas and El Faro, Malumphy (2010)
(Cockerell) Gran Canaria & Spain
Acalypha, Croton, Coleus Neotropical Ben-Dov (1994)
Rastrococcus Plumeria, Croton, Euphorbia, Ben-Dov (1994)
iceryoides Green Caesalpinia
Euphorbia, Leucas India Vijay and Suresh (2013)
Cycas sp. Ben-Dov (1994)
Hibiscus, Crotons, Rose & India Williams (2004)
Cassia
Hibiscus, Crotons Malaysia Williams (2004)
Rastrococcus Nerium, Plumeria, Roses Nigeria Ivbijaro et al. (1992)
invadens Williams Acalypha hispida Nigeria Akintola and Ande (2006)
Heliconia, Ixora Ben-Dov (1994)
Rastrococcus spinosus Plumeria Malaysia Williams (2004)
(Robinson)
Rastrococcus vicorum Plumeria Malaysia Williams (2004)
Williams & Watson
Rhizoecus americanus Chrysanthemum & Hibiscus Nearctic, Ben-Dov (1994)
(Hambleton) neotropicalaearctic region
Rhizoecus arabicus Gasteranthus atratus Florida Hamon (1982)
Hambleton
Rhizoecus dianthi African violet & California and other Ben-Dov (1994)
Green Chrysanthemum countries
Rhizoecus falcifer Aralia, stephanis, Ben-Dov (1994)
Kunckel d Herculais chrysanthemum, lotus,
hibiscus & Jasmine
Rhizoecus hawaiiensis Coleus Hawaii Ben-Dov (1994)
(Hambleton)
V. Sridhar et al.
Mealybug species Host plant Region/country Reference
Rhizoecus hibisci Cryptanthus Florida Anonymous (1978)
Kawai & Takagi Cuphea, Hibiscus, Japan Anonymous (1978)
Pelargonium
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis Tokyo Kawai and Takagi (1971)
Florida Anonymous (1979)
Nerium, hibiscus Puerto Rico, Japan Ben-Dov (1994)
Rhizoecus kondonis Nerium, Chrysanthemum, California, Japan &China Ben-Dov (1994)
55 Ornamental Plants

Kuwana
Spilococcus leucopogi Ornamental plants Bulgaria Pencheva and Gerasimova (2006)
(Brittin)
Spilococcus eriogoni Asparagus California, Mexico Ben-Dov (1994)
(Ehrhorni)
Spilococcus Ornamentals Many countries Ben-Dov (1994)
mamillariae (Bouche)
Spilococcus pressus Nerium &Aster California Ben-Dov (1994)
Ferris
Vryburgia amaryllidis Plant families (Liliaceae and California & USA Lain et al. (2004)
(Bouche) Iridaceae)
Ornamental plants Bulgaria Pencheva and Gerasimova (2006)
Vryburgia bechuanae Geranium South Africa Ben-Dov (1994)
(Brain)
Vryburgia brevicruris Asclepiadaceae and other Belgium Ronse and Matile-Ferrero (1991)
(McKenzie) succulents
505
506 V. Sridhar et al.

Hibiscus shrub heavily infested M. hirsutus on hibiscus Various developmental stages


of M. hirsutus
(Courtesy: Dale Meyerdirk, APHIS)

Maconellicoccus hirsutus was known to attack ing levels. The population of C. montrouzieri
several ornamental crops in the Mariana Islands. declined for the rst 2 weeks, and then increased
The predator C. montrouzieri supplemented to a peak of 6 weeks after release. The predator
Anagyrus kamali and Allotropa mecrida sp. in population declined at about the same time as the
maintaining population density of M. hirsutus pest (McComie et al. 1997). In India, Spalgis
below the economic threshold at all locations epeus Westwood is the common natural enemy
(Reddy et al. 2009). After eld releases of C. found on mealybugs infesting hibiscus.
montrouzieri in May and July 1996 for control of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, when released @ 20
M. hirsutus on ornamental hibiscus in Port of grubs/plant, reduced mealybug populations from
Spain, Trinidad, the mealybug population uctu- 84.3/plant in March to 0.9/plant in May (Mani
ated from 8 to 20 weeks, continuing, at a decreas- and Krishnamoorthy 2008).

Biocontrol agents for M. hirsutus

C. mountrouzieri Anagyrus kamali

According to Lai Yi-Chun and Chang Niann- sinensis (Goolsby et al. 2002). Since its acciden-
Tai (2007), all C. montrouzieri introduced were tal introduction into the island of Grenada in
killed and removed in 132.5 min by ants particu- 1994, A. kamali and C. montrouzieri were highly
larly Pheidole megacephala (Fabricius) and effective in bringing PHMB populations under
Tapinoma elanocephalum (Fabricius) in Taiwan. control (Sagarra and Peterkin 1999).
In Queensland, Australia C. montrouzieri was Invasion by M. hirsutus in Puerto Rico could
recovered on M. hirsutus infesting Hibiscus rosa- be restricted to less economic impact due to the
55 Ornamental Plants 507

timely introduction of A. kamali and of the laycaenid predator, S. epeus (Mani and
Gyranusoidea indica (Michaud and Evans 2000). Krishnamoorthy 2008). Cryptolaemus moun-
Efforts were made in 1922 to control M. hirsutus trouzieri was also found effective against this
on ornamentals with Cryptolaemus montrouzieri mealybug on hibiscus (Mani 2008).
introduced from France (Hall 1927). M. hirsutus
was found on ornamental hibiscus in Egypt in
20002001. Among several parasitoids recovered 55.1.4 Phenacoccus solenopsis
from PHMB, a gregarious parasitoid, Allotropa
mecrida was by far the most abundant parasitoid Phenacoccus solenopsis causes devastating dam-
attacking PHMB in Egypt. Primary parasitoids age on H. rosa-sinensis (Babasaheb 2012).
made up 94.9 % of the total parasitoids emerging Hibiscus syriacus was one of the most preferred
while 5.1 % were secondary (Gonzalez et al. hosts for P. solenopsis (Dhawan et al. 2010). A
2003). mean infestation of 96.4 % was reported in
Pakistan by Abbas et al. (2010).
According to Arve et al. (2011), the popula-
55.1.2 Planococcus citri tion of P. solenopsis on hibiscus was observed
throughout the year with its peak activity from
Planococcus citri causes severe damage to rst fortnight of October to rst fortnight of
Hibiscus rosasinensis. Cryptolaemus montrouz- December. The nymphs and adult female mealy-
ieri was effective for the management of this bugs were preyed by two predators Spalgis epeus
mealybug in India (Mani et al. 2011). (Westwood) and Scymnus coccivora (Ayyar
1963). Cryptolaemus montrouzieri gave excellent
control of P. solenopsis on Hibiscus after 4
55.1.3 Coccidohystrix insolita months of release in 2007 at Pune, India (Mani
2008). Aenasius bambawalei Hayat was found
Coccidohystrix insolita was recorded on H. rosa- parasitizing the Ph. solenopsis on hibiscus in
sinensis (Suresh and Mohanasundaram 1996 and Bangalore North. Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. was
Williams 2004). Mealybug population declined found seriously infested with Phenacoccus sole-
from 145.6/plant in February to 0.6/plant in April nopsis in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province,
2003. There was 99.6 % reduction in the popula- China (Wu and Zhang 2009) and Iran
tion of C. insolita within 60 days of appearance (Moghaddam and Bagheri 2010).

Pl. citri Ph. solenopsis C. insolita Ph. madeirensis


508 V. Sridhar et al.

55.1.5 Paracoccus marginatus Planococcus citri on Coleus blumei was reduced


or eliminated by two applications of Temik
Acerophagus papayae (Noyes and Schauff) is granules at 0.005 g a.i./pot giving complete con-
found very useful to control P. marginatus on trol. Acephate at 150 ppm as a single soil drench
several crops including Hibiscus (Shylesha et al. gave good results, and was easy to apply
2011). (Lindquist 1979). Coccidohystrix insolita was
recorded on Coleus aromaticus and C. variega-
tum (Suresh and Mohanasundaram 1996;
55.2 Coleus Williams 2004).

Planococcus citri was known to damage orna-


mental coleus (Solenostemon scutellarioi- 55.3 China Aster
des = Coleus blumei (Bentham) (Ghorbanian
et al. 2011). Yang JinSong and Sadof (1995) Phenacoccus parvus Morrison was recorded
reported that nymphs of P. citri developed most feeding mainly on collar region and subterranean
rapidly and adult females produced more eggs plant parts. About 25 % of the plants were
on red-variegated plants as compared with green infested making the plant stunted without bearing
counterparts. Yang JinSong and Sadof (1997) owers (Sridhar et al. 2012). Phenacoccus par-
indicated that population growth rates (rm) of vus Morrison was identied for the rst time in
the parasitoid Leptomastix dactylopii How. (a Australia after it was found causing severe dam-
parasitoid of P. citri) were higher on red-varie- age to Lantana at Gatton, Queensland, in the win-
gated and green-plants than on yellow-varie- ter of 1988; it must have spread quite rapidly in
gated plants (Solenostemon scutellarioides). the summer of 19881989 and is now widespread
Cloyd and Sadof (2000) reported higher attack throughout the Lockyer Valley (Campbell 1990).
of the parasitoid on caged plants as the number
of citrus mealy bugs increased. Hogendorp et al.
(2006) reported the greatest egg loads, were 55.4 Chrysanthemum
larger in size, and had the shortest developmen-
tal times in citrus mealy bugs receiving the high The Madeira mealybug, Ph. madeirensis, has
nitrogen fertilizer concentrations (200 and 400 become an increasingly damaging pest on chry-
ppm). Hogendorp et al. (2009) indicated that santhemum (Dendranthema grandiorum)
applying silicon-based fertilizers, like potas- (Chong et al. 2003). Phenacoccus parvus inci-
sium silicate had no effect on the population of dence on chrysanthemum was recorded from
P. citri infesting coleus. Cryptolaemus mon- Orissa (Williams 2004). Pseudococcus jack-
trouzieri was used to control the mealybug P. beardsleyi Gimpel and Miller was also reported
citri on coleus (Garcia and ONeil 2000). on chrysanthemum in India (Shylesha 2013).
55 Ornamental Plants 509

Ph. madeirensis Ph. solenopsis parasitized by Aenasius bambawalei

55.5 Poinsettia oxamyl. Diubenzuron was also found to be


effective against F. virgata. Permethrin provided
Striped mealybug Ferrisia virgata (Ckll.) is the the most effective control of the mealybugs 21
major mealy bug infesting Poinsettia (Euphorbia) days after dip treatment of tubers of Caladiums
pulcherrima. The plants of poinsettia were com- (Price 1979).
pletely cleared of this mealybug with release of
C. montrouzieri (Mani et al. 2011).
55.7 Clerodendron

55.6 Caladiums Planococcus citri is the common mealy bug on


Clerodendron phillippinum (Mani and
Ferrisia virgata is the major pest on Caladiums. Krishnamoorthy 2003). Leptomastix dactylopii
Mealybugs on foliage were controlled best by (How.) is an effective parasite that can be utilized
four sprays at weekly intervals by permethrin or to control this mealybug.
510 V. Sridhar et al.

Mealybugs on Rose Poinsettia with F. virgata Clerodendron with P. citri

55.8 Dieffenbachia corms by sucking the sap causing shrivelling and


drying of affected corms. Prompt collection and
Planococcus citri is the major pest on destruction of infested parts reduces spread of the
Dieffenbachia. Diazinon, oxamyl, malathion, pest. Crawling of ants on plants is the sign of
acephate and butocarboxim were found highly beginning of mealy bug infestation. Spraying
effective in controlling P. citri on potted plants of should be taken up at this stage. Sprays of methyl
Dieffenbachia exotica (Chandler 1980). Three parathion 0.04 % or dimethoate 0.04 % or
applications over 4 weeks of Enstar 5E [kino- acephate 0.1 % at 15 days interval effectively
prene] at 8 or 16 oz/100 gal and Zoecon controls mealybug infestation (Jhansi Rani
Houseplant Mist (Enstar + resmethrin) at the rec- 2001). Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrhorn) and
ommended rate reduced the number of citrus Dysmicoccus sp. are also known to attack
mealybugs (P. citri) on Dieffenbachia sp. from gladiolus.
initial populations of 304329/plant to 6.2, 0 and
13/plant, respectively, 5 weeks after the rst
application (Lindquist 1981). 55.11 Saxifrages

Pseudococcus vibruni (Pseudococcus obscures)


55.9 Schefera (Essig) is known to infest Saxifraga longifolia.
The ability of this mealybug to reproduce at low
Four applications over 3 weeks of Enstar 5E at 8 temperatures constitutes a serious threat to grow-
or 16 oz/100 gal and Zoecon Houseplant Mist at ers of saxifrages. Exposed colonies can be
the recommended rate, Safers Insecticidal Soap removed by hand or sprayed with malathion or
at 400 oz/100 gal and Murphys Oil Soap (a non- nicotine, while concentrated colonies are best
insecticide preparation) at 800 oz/100 gal reduced controlled with a systemic insecticides such as
the number of citrus mealybugs on Schefera sp. dimethoate or formothion (Southgate 1974).
from 139261/plant to 3.8, 3.8, 4, 5.5 and 13.2/
plant, respectively, 4 weeks after the rst applica-
tion (Lindquist 1981). 55.12 Jasmine

The pseudococcid, Rastrococcus iceryoides


55.10 Gladiolus (Green) was observed in Bangalore infesting
leaves of Jasminum rigidum. The lycaenid
Damage by F. virgata begins in the eld on Spalgis epeus was observed feeding voraciously
underground corms during dry conditions and on R. iceryoides (Vasundhara et al. 1990).
carries on to storage. Nymphs and adults damage Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Tozzetti)
55 Ornamental Plants 511

was recorded in severe form on Jasminum sam- in India. Ferrisia virgata and Phenacoccus orna-
bac in India (Mani et al. 2011). Heavy popula- tus were also reported on Jasmine (David and
tions of Lankacoccus ornatus (Green) have been Ananthakrishnan 2004).
reported as covering the leaves of Jasminum sp.

Jasmine with P. longispinus Tube rose with F. virgata P. minor on crotons

55.13 Tube Rose August 2002. On 30th and 40th day of release,
the mealy bug population was further reduced
Mealybugs particularly Ferrisia virgata and to 50.45/plant and 4.87/plant, respectively. The
Planococcus citri have become increasing plants were completely cleared of the mealy
threat to tube rose cultivation in India (Mani bugs with about 50 days after the release of the
and Krishnamoorthy 2007a; Shanthi et al. predator (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 2007a).
2008). Following the release of C. montrouz- Dysmicoccus neobrevipes (Cockerell) is known
ieri, the mealybug population declined from to attack severely the roots of tube rose in
190 to 108/plant within 20 days during July Bangalore North, India.

F. virgata on tube rose Ph. madeirensis on Jasmine


512 V. Sridhar et al.

55.14 Crossandra inside the spikelets and they excrete honeydew


leading to the development of sooty mould inter-
Planococcus citri was observed infesting fering with the photosynthetic activity of the
Crossandra undulifolia in India (Mani and plants. Following the release of C. montrouzieri,
Krishnamoorthy 2007b). The mealybugs suck the the plants were almost cleared of the mealy bugs
sap from leaves, stem, tender spikes, spikelets by about 3 months in India (Mani and
and developing buds. Heavy mealy bug infesta- Krishnamoorthy 2007a).
tion was observed on lower surface of leaves and

Ph. madeirensis on crossandra Ph. solenopsis on gerbera Ps. jackbeardsley on Epipremnum

55.15 Crotons of the pest. The local natural enemies


Sympherobius amicus Navas, Scymnus syriacus
Citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri is the major (Mars.) and Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) and
mealybug on crotons (Codiaeum variegatum). In Coccidoxenoides permintus (Timberlake) were
1952, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri was released found feeding on P. citri infesting croton shrubs
along with some parasitoids for the management (A et al. 2010). Crotons are also known to be
of this mealybug. The predator has survived for severely damaged by several mealybugs in India.
several generations but could not become perma- Planocoocus minor (Maskell) is a major pest on
nently established (Bennett and Hughes 1959). it. C. montrouzieri is effective to control the
C. montrouzieri was used to control P. citri on the mealy bugs on crotons (Mani 2008). Rastrococcus
crotons Codiaeum variegatum at Giza governor- invadens in Nigeria (Ivbijaro et al. 1992) and
ate, Egypt. After 3 months of releasing the preda- Maconellicoccus hirsutus in India (Manjunath
tor, reduction rates reached to 100 % for all stages et al. 1992) are also known to attack crotons.
55 Ornamental Plants 513

Pa. marginatus on plumeria Ph. madeirensis on acalypha Pa. marginatus on acalypha

55.16 Acalypha atively correlated with temperature. Top leaves


of all these plants were preferred by mealybugs
Striped mealy bug, Ferrisia virgata is the (Mari et al. 2007).
major mealybug species attacking Acalypha
macrophylla. The coccinellid predator,
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, was used to con- 55.17 Heliconia
trol this pest in Giza region, Egypt and other
places. The optimum release rate was 10 Dysmicoccus brevipes was recorded on Heliconia
Cryptolaemus adults/shrub of Acalypha. The (Ben-Dov 1994). The aerial individuals are to be
percentage of reduction of F. virgata reached found mostly at the base of the leaves, which may
95.39 % (Attia and El-Arnaouty 2007). The have to be spread in order to make the bugs
coccinellid predator, when released at 20 lar- evidence. Maximum population of mealybug was
vae/plant, was found highly effective in clear- noticed during hot climatic conditions and in
ing the mealy bug F. virgata and also C. insolita plains, while hilly region and low temperature
on acalypha within 2 months of its release in with high humid areas the pest incidence was
India (Mani 2008). At Sindh Agriculture very minimum. Severe infestation of Planococcus
University Tando Jam, the population of the citri was found on Heliconia under nethouse con-
longtailed Ps. lonispinus on Acalypha was neg- ditions in India.

Ps. jackbeardsley F. virgata on Acalypha Madeira mealybug


on chrysanthemum on Bromeliads
514 V. Sridhar et al.

55.18 Clivia mealybugs. As a last resort, chemical insecticides


can be used to remove a mealybug infestation.
Comstock mealy bug, Pseudococcus com-
stocki (Kuwana), is the major species infesting
this bulbous ornamental Clivia miniata. In 55.22 Woody Ornamentals
Beijing, C. montrouzieri was released on Clivia
miniata to control this mealybug and there was Malumphy (2010) recorded Puto barberi
92 % reduction in numbers of P. comstocki per (Cockerell) infesting woody ornamental plants
leaf (Dong 1993). from Spain and reviewed its host range, biology,
geographical distribution and economic impor-
tance. Pseudococcus calceolariae (Maskell), a
55.19 Oranamental Citrus pest of ornamental woody plants, was rst reported
in Italy. Natural enemies Cryptolaemus montrouz-
Citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri, a major ieri, Tetracnemoidea peregrina (Compere),
mealybug pest on ornamental citrus was found Anagyrus fusciventris (Girault) and
feeding sporadically by Cryptolaemus montrouz- Tetracnemoidea brevicornis (Girault) were con-
ieri in central Italy (Del Bene and Gargani 2006) sidered for trials against P. calceolariae. Early
and Netherlands (Hennekam et al. 1987). instars can be controlled by means of light mineral
oils combined with fenitrothion, methidathion or
tetrachlorvinphos at low concentrations which do
55.20 Europrotea not affect parasitoids within the hosts, and affect
the free-living stages of natural enemies (Laudonia
Paracoccus marginatus infestations were man- and Viggiani 1986). Heavy predation by
aged by mass release of C. montrouzieri in Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. was observed
Europroteas plantation in Portugal (Leandro on Pseudococcus viburni infesting Cercis sili-
et al. 2006). quastrum in avenues in Turin (Arzone 1983).

55.21 Bromeliad 55.23 Bougainvillea

Mealybugs are found devastating to bromeliads. Phenacoccus peruvianus Granara de Willink is


They feed on the sap of bromeliads by puncturing native to South America (Argentina, Peru) and
the living tissues on leaves and roots causing sig- has been introduced to several countries includ-
nicant damage to the plant. Mealybugs excrete a ing Almeria, Spain, France, Monaco and Spain,
sticky substance called honeydew that is left Portugal, the Balearic Islands, Corsica and Sicily.
behind on plants surface. This sweet honeydew England Western Mediterranean on indoor plant-
is highly desired by ants. Mealybug infestation, ings and on sheltered plants outdoors. It is com-
on bromeliads leaves may begin to turn yellow monly known as the bougainvillea mealybug
and drop. The plant may experience distorted because of its preference for this host. The mealy-
growth and the appearance of a black sooty bug populations damage the plants by causing
mould may become present. If the infestation is necrosis of the foliage, leaf loss and die back.
small, use a cotton swab to swipe the mealybugs Being polyphagous, it also occurs on other woody
with Isopropyl Alcohol. It is also a good idea to ornamentals. They can move relatively quickly,
wash the plant with a strong water spray to or at least more quickly than most mealybugs
remove any residual eggs from the plants. Many encountered in Britain. Adult and nymph bou-
outdoor pests are kept under control through the gainvillea mealybugs mainly feed on the lower
natural presence of predators. These soaps and surfaces of the foliage, but are also found on the
oils are not toxic and work by suffocating the growing shoots, bark, and occasionally the upper
55 Ornamental Plants 515

leaf surfaces. It is advisable to check plants for dum (Linnaeus). Permanent establishment was
pests such as mealybugs before purchase and not achieved, however despite the fact that small
before introducing them into a greenhouse or colonies survived for some months (Bennett and
conservatory. Cultural control of bougainvillea Hughes 1959). Inspect the foliage of sago palm
mealybug can be achieved by removing and care- carefully to identify where mealybugs are located
fully disposing infested leaves and stems. The on the plant. Soak a cotton swab in rubbing alco-
larvae of Cryptolaemus are available to gardeners hol and rub the cotton swab over mealybugs on
and professional growers for the biological con- the infested palm to kill the bugs on contact. This
trol of mealybugs. They are most effective in treatment is effective for small numbers of mealy-
summer and need temperatures of at least 20 C bugs on a sago palm, but it is not practical to carry
for a few hours a day. For chemical control, sys- out when there are heavy infestations (http://
temic insecticides can be used. For ornamental www.ehow.com/how_12083815_kill-mealy-
plants in greenhouses or conservatories, garden- bugs-sago-palm.html).
ers can use products containing thiacloprid, acet-
amiprid, thiamethoxam or imidacloprid (http://
www.fera.defra.gov.uk/plants/publications/ doc- 55.26 Myoporum
uments/factsheets/bougainvillea.pdf).
In Morocco, C. montrouzieri was successful
some times against P. citri on the hedge plant
55.24 Araucaria (Myoporum) but was effective against heavy
infestations of P. citri when released in large
Araucaria, gliricidia and several other trees numbers (Boughelier 1935).
grown in parks and avenues in Bangalore (India)
have been found infested with the mealybug
Planococuus citri (Risso). C. montrouzieri was 55.27 MEALYBUG MANAGEMENT
the principal predator becoming abundant in IN ORNAMENTALS
April-May and October-November on these
plants. In some cases up to 12,000 larvae of Chemical Control
Cryptolaemus were encountered per tree. In such
cases, though belated, they completely controlled In Bulgaria, azinphos-methyl at 0.15 % and
the mealybugs (Manjunath 1986). phenthoate at 0.08 % proved the most effec-
tive materials against the mealybugs.
Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrh.), Ps. adoni-
55.25 Sago Palm dum (L.) and Planococcus citri (Risso) infest-
ing ornamentals (Tsalev 1970).
Sago palms arent palm trees at allthese attrac- In Florida, acephate, oxydemeton-methyl and
tive, low-growing plants are actually cycads. Sago the insect growth regulator kinoprene were
palms are compact evergreen plants that make an found highly toxic to Pseudococcus longispi-
attractive addition to home interiors. The plants nus and Phenacoccus solani Ferris on orna-
are prone to mealybug infestations. Mealybugs mental plants. Overall reductions of Rhizoecus
are small, oval insects that use their sharp mouth- oridanus Hambleton by kinoprene and
parts to feed on the sap from sago palm foliage. epofenonane were comparable to the insecti-
Severe infestations can cause discoloured foliage, cides acephate and oxamyl (Hamlen 1977).
irregular growth and plant death. Mealybugs are One application of ZR-777 (prop-2-ynyl 3, 7,
easy to kill on sago palms with the proper treat- 11-trimethyl-(2E,4E)-2, 4 dodecadienoate) at
ment. In Bermuda, C. montrouzieri was liberated 1,000 ppm as foliar spray effectively reduces
on sage palm infested with Pseudococcus adoni- the mealybug populations on Ardisia crispa
516 V. Sridhar et al.

(crenata) and Gynura sarmentosa (Hamlen bugs. Insecticidal soap containing 49.5 %
1975). potassium salts of fatty acids or TweenReg con-
Diazinon, oxamyl, malathion, acephate and taining 100 % polysorbate 80 can be used to
butocarboxim all proved highly effective in create aqueous, plant-safe emulsions of these
controlling Planococcus citri on Dieffenbachia oils that are effective in controlling waxy insect
exotica, Ficus benjamina, Coleus sp. and Ps. longispinus. When sodium lauryl sulfate
Philodendron cordatum (Chandler 1980). and citric acid are included in the formulation,
This cocktail containing iminocloprid efcacy increases dramatically. Many types of
(growth regulator) + acephate (Systemic insec- ornamental plants tolerate these enhanced mix-
ticide) was sprayed on an orchid and coleus tures, which penetrate and kill mealybugs within
heavily infested with mealybugs. Two months seconds (Hollingsworth and Hamnett 2010).
later, these plants were ourishing with no Using 1 % limonene (a citrus extract), 0.75 %
sign of mealybugs. APSA-80 and 0.1 % Silwet L-77, a semitrans-
Acephate (780 mg/litre) was found to reduce parent mixture (primarily a micro emulsion)
the populations of longtailed mealybug was obtained that was safe for most plants and
Pseudococcus longispinus to zero on provided good control of mealybugs when
Asplenium bulbiferum (hen and chicken fern), sprayed or used in 1-min dips. Limonene has
while imidacloprid reduced the infestation to promise as a safe, natural pesticide for insect
14 % fronds infested and mean of 0.52.5 pests on tolerant plants. They caused no dam-
mealybugs on the youngest infested frond age to ornamentals with thick, waxy leaves,
(Martin and Workman 1999). such as palms, cycads, and orchids
In the Imperial Valley of California (USA), (Hollingsworth 2005).
imidacloprid-treated and thiamethoxam- The mealybug Phenacoccus solani Ferris was
treated hibiscus plants were completely free effectively reduced with acephate and vydate
of Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Castle and on Aphelandra squarrosa (Hamlen 1977).
Prabhaker 2011).
In Shanghai region 15 % aldicarb granules
mixed in soil around the ornamental succulent Biological Control
Kalanchos blossfeldiana plant roots or 40 %
omethoate 100x poured over the roots resulted Release the Australian ladybird beetle
in 97 % control or more of Planococus citri Cryptolaemus montrouzieri to control the
(Tang et al. 1992). mealy bugs on ornamentals in general (Mani
In Poland, pirimiphos-methyl 50 EC and and Krishnamoorthy 2003) and host specic
methidathion 40 EC are recommended to con- parasitoids for the control of mealy bugs on
trol Planococcus vovae (Nasonov) infesting ornamental crops.
common juniper, Juniperus communis (Golan In a commercial greenhouse in Leiden,
and Jaskiewicz 2002). Netherlands, successful control of the pseudo-
Horticultural oils kill all stages of the mealy- coccid Planococcus citri on Stephanotis
bugs that are present at application, and often plants was obtained with the coccinellid pred-
give good control. Oil products labelled as ators Cryptolaemus montrouzieri and Nephus
summer, superior, or Volck oil are high grade reunioni (Fursch); and the encyrtid parasitoids
and may be used on tolerant plants during Leptomastix dactylopii and Leptomastidea
either the growing or dormant seasons, but at abnormis (Girault) during summer and
different concentrations. autumn (Hennekam et al. 1987).
Post-harvest dips in properly formulated oil-in- Introduction of parasitoids Leptomastidea
water emulsions of terpene oils such as limo- abnormis and Leptomastix dactylopii gave
nene or essential oils such as peppermint oil or improved biological control of Planococcus
spearmint oil is advocated to control the mealy- citri in a large glasshouse stocked with a
55 Ornamental Plants 517

variety of ornamental plants in the UK, Delottococcus sp. infesting Leucospermum


supplementing that achieved by the coccinel- (Passarinho et al. 2006).
lid predator (Tingle and Copland 1988). Periodic releases of a green lacewing,
Leptomastix dactylopii and Leptomastidea Chrysoperla rulabris (Burmeister) had
abnormis are used as biological control agents reduced populations of the long-tailed mealy-
against Planococcus citri on ornamental bug, Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni
plants in the greenhouse in the Netherlands Tozzetti), infesting pothos ivy, Epipremnum
(Alphen and van Xu 1990). aureum (Goolsby et al. 2000).
The parasitoid Anagyrus pseudococci
(Girault) is used to control Planococcus citri
and Pseudococcus afnis (Maskell) on
Streptocarpus hybridus or Aeschynanthus 55.27.1 Pheromone-Based
ellipticus. Leptomastix dactylopii was able to Management
parasitize these mealybugs. Cryptolaemus
montrouzieri gave good control of Operational parameters of traps baited with the
Pseudococcus afnis on S. hybridus, Citrus, pheromones of three mealybug species namely
Passiora, potato and coffee, while N. reunioni Ps. longispinus, Pl. citri and Ps. viburni were
gave good control on ornamental citrus but optimized in nurseries producing ornamental
was less effective on S. hybridus (Copland plants. Traps Lures containing 25 microgram
et al. 1993). dose had effectiveness in the eld for at least 12
In the Southwest of Alentejo, releases of week, were used to detect infestations of mealy-
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri gave good control bugs season long and to track population changes
of mealybugs Paracoccus sp. and in the eld (Waterworth et al. 2011).

Ornamentals damaged by mealybugs

M. hirsutus on red ginger P. lilacinus on Bhaunia Pl. citri on Heliconia


518 V. Sridhar et al.

Pl. citri on Ixora sp. Ph. parvus on China Aster F. virgata on C. pulcherima

Phenacoccus solenopsis on Tagetes Ph. madierensis on Tagetes Mealybugs on Tithonia

Ps. jackbearsley on nerium F. virgata on nerium

Akintola AJ, Ande AT (2006) Aspect of biology of


References Rastrococcus sp. of Acalypha hipida in Southern
Guinnea savanna, Nigeria. Afr J Agric Res 1:2123
Abbas G, Arif MJ, Ashfaq M, Aslam M, Saeed S (2010) Akintola AJ, Ande AT (2009) Pest status and ecology of
Host plants, distribution and overwintering of cotton ve mealybugs (Family: Pseudococcidae) in the
mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis); Hemiptera: Southern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. J Entomol Res
Pseudococcidae. Int J Agric Biol 12:421425 33(1):913
A AI, El-Arnaouty SA, Attia AR, Alla AEA (2010) Alphen JJ, Van M, Xu CR (1990) The role of host-plant
Biological control of citrus mealy bug, Planococcus odours in the attraction of Leptomastix dactylopii and
citri (Risso.) using coccinellid predator, Cryptolaemus Leptomastidea abnormis, parasitoids of the citrus
montrouzieri Muls. Pak J Biol Sci 13:216222 mealybug, Planococcus citri. Mededelingen van de
55 Ornamental Plants 519

Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen, Rijksuniversiteit Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de


Gent 55(2a):343353 Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in two ecologi-
Anonymous (1978) A mealybug (Trionymus caricis) cal zones of Ghana. Res Zool 1:17
Alabama new state record. Cooper Plant Pest Rep Chandler LD (1980) Greenhouse insecticide evaluations
3(1/4):6 for suppression of citrus mealybug on ornamental foli-
Anonymous (1979) A mealybug (Rhizoecus hibisci Kawai age plants. Progress Report, Texas Agric Exp Stn,
& Takagi) Florida a new Western Hemisphere PR-3685, 11 p
record. Cooper Plant Pest Rep 4(1):6 Chellappan M, Lince L, Indhu P, Cherian T, Anitha S,
Arif MI, Raq M, Ghaffar A (2009) Host plants of cotton Jimcymaria T (2013) Host range and distribution pat-
mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis): a new menace to tern of papaya mealy bug, Paracoccus marginatus
cotton agro ecosystem of Punjab, Pakistan. Int J Agric Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera :
Biol 11:163167 Pseudococcidae) on selected Euphorbiaceae hosts in
Arve SS, Patel KG, Chavan SM, Vidhate PK (2011) Kerala. J Trop Agric 51(12):5159
Investigation on population dynamics of hibiscus Cheng H, Chum YS (2011) Insects causing damage to
mealy bug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley in rela- plants of the genus Syringa. [Chinese]. J Northeast For
tion to biotic factors under south Gujarat condition. Univ 39(3):113116
J Biopest 4:211213 Chong JH, Oetting RD, Van Iersel MW (2003)
Arzone A (1983) Pseudococcus obscurus Essig and Temperature effects on the development, survival, and
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. in Turin. [Italian]. reproduction of the Madeira mealybug, Phenacoccus
Atti XIII Congresso Nazionale Italiano di Entomologia, madeirensis Green (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), on
pp 448452 chrysanthemum. Ann Entomol Soc Am
Attia AR, El-Arnaouty SA (2007) Use of the coccinellid 96(4):539543
predator, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant against Cloyd RA, Sadof CS (2000) Effects of plant architecture
the striped mealy bug, Ferrisia virgata (Ckll.) on the on the attack rate of Leptomastix dactylopii
ornamental plant, Agalypha macrophylla in Egypt. (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), a parasitoid of the citrus
J Biol Pest Control 17:7176 mealy bug (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Environ
Ayyar TVR (1963) Hand book of economic entomology Entomol 29:535541
for South India. Govt. of Madras, 516 p Copland MJW, Perera HAS, Heidari M (1993) Inuence
Babasaheb BF (2012) Modeling the impact of climate of host plant on the biocontrol of glasshouse mealy-
change on potential geographic distribution of polyph- bug. Bull OILB/SROP 16(8):4447
agous mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis in India. David BV, Ananthakrishnan TN (2004) General and
Paper presented In: IV National symposium on Plant applied entomology. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing,
protection in Horticultural Crops, held during 2528 New Delhi, 1184 p
April 2012, Bangalore, p 37 Paiva PDO, Ceralli M, Resende ML (2005) Cultivation of
Beardsley JW (1986) Taxonomic notes on Pseudococcus gladiolus. (Floricultura) [Portuguese]. Informe
elisae Borchsenius, a mealybug new to the Hawaiian Agropecuario 26(227):5054
Fauna (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Proc Hawaiian Del Bene G, Gargani E (2006) Planococcus citri on orna-
Entomol Soc 26:3134 mental Citrus plants in central Italy. Integrated control
Ben-Dov Y (1993) Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel in in citrus fruit crops. IOBC WPRS Bull 29:259
Israel. [Hebrew]. Alon Hanotea 47(4):271272 Dhawan AK, Saini S, Singh K (2010) Seasonal occur-
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- rence of cotton mealy bug Phenacoccus solenopsis
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Tinsley on different hosts in Punjab. Indian J Ecol
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- 37:105109
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic Dong HF (1993) A preliminary study on the occurrence of
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p Pseudococcus comstocki (Hom.: Pseudococcidae) on
Bennett FD, Hughes IW (1959) Biological control of Clivia miniata and its control with inundative release
insect pests of Bermuda. Bull Entomol Res of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Col.: Coccinellidae)
50:423436 [Chinese]. Chinese J Biol Control 9(1):1214
Boughelier R (1935) Observations sur quelques El-Minshawy AH, Karam HH, El-Sawaf SK (1974)
Coccinelles coccidiphages au maroc. Rev Zool Agric Biological studies on the long tailed mealy bug,
34:1720 Pseudococcus longispinus (Targ. and Tozzeti)
Campbell C (1990) Lantana mealybug arrives. Aust (Homoptera:Pseudococcidae). Bulletin de la Societe
Hortic 88(1):57 Entomologique dEgypte 58:385391
Castle SJ, Prabhaker N (2011) Field evaluation of two Etienne J, Matile-Ferrero D, Leblanc F, Marival D (1998)
systemic neonicotinoid insecticides against pink hibis- First record of the mealybug Maconellicoccus hirsutus
cus mealybug (Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green)) on (Green) from Guadeloupe; present state of this pest of
mulberry trees. J Pest Sci 84(3):363371 crops in the French Caribbean (Hem., Pseudococcidae).
Cham D, Davis H, Obeng-Ofori D, Owusu E (2011) Host [French]. Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique de
range of the newly invasive mealybug species France 103(2):173174
520 V. Sridhar et al.

Galanihe LD, Jayasundera MUP, Vithana A, Pseudococcidae). Entomology Circular, Division of


Asselaarachchi N, Watson GW (2010) Occurrence, Plant Industry, Florida Department of Agriculture and
distribution and control of papaya mealybug, Consumer Services 238, 2 p
Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), Hara AH, Hata TY, Hu BKS, Tsang MMC (1997) Hot-air
an invasive alien pest in Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res Ext induced thermotolerance of red ginger owers and
13(3):8186 mealybugs to postharvest hot-water immersion.
Garcia JF, ONeil RJ (2000) Effect of Coleus size and var- Postharv Biol Technol 12(1):101108
iegation on attack rates, searching strategy and Helmuth GZ, Sandi P, Cuen M (2010) The threat of
selected life history characteristics of Cryptolaemus mealybugs Hypogeococcus pungens and
montrouzieri (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Biol Hypogeococcus festerianus (Hemiptera:
Control 18:225234 Pseudococcidae) to Mexican and Caribbean cactus
Gautam RD (2003) Fumigation of fresh agricultural pro- [Spanish]. Cactaceas y Suculentas Mexicanas
duce with magnesium phosphide for quarantine secu- 55(1):417
rity. Indian J Entomol 65:193201 Hennekam MMB, Kole M, Van Opzeeland K, Van Alphen
Ghorbanian S, Aghdam HR, Ghajarieh H, Malkeshi H JJM (1987) Biological control of citrus-mealybug in a
(2011) Life cycle and population growth parameters of commercial crop of ornamental plants in the
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant (Col.: Netherlands. Mededelingen van de Facultei
Coccinellidae) reared on Planococcus citri (Risso) Landbouwwetenschappen, Rijksuniversiteit Gent
(Hem.: Pseudococcidae) on Coleus. J Entomol Res 52(2a):329338
Soc 13:5359 Hodges G, Hodges A (2004) New invasive species of
Golan K, Jaskiewicz B (2002) Noxiousness and control of mealybugs, Palmicultor lumpurensis and
the juniper mealybug, Planococcus vovae [Polish] Chaetococcus bambusae (Hemiptera: Coccoidea:
Szkodliwosc i zwalczanie maczystka jalowcowego. Pseudococcidae) on bamboo in Florida. Fla Entomol
Ochrona Roslin 46(6):1112 87(3):396397
Gonzalez D, El-Heneidy AH, Mousa SM, Triapitsyn SV, Hofker K, Conijn C, Van Alphen JJM (1991) Is the iris
Adly D, Trjapitzin VA, Meyerdirk DE (2003) A sur- mealybug, Phenacoccus avenae Borchsenius, able to
vey for pink hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hir- multiply itself and spread in bulbelds in the
sutus (Green) and its parasitoids in Egypt, Spain and Netherlands? Mededelingen van de Faculteit
Morocco. Egyp J Biol Pest Control 13(1/2):15 Landbouwwetenschappen. Rijksuniversiteit Gent
Gonzalez-Gaona E, Sanchez-Martinez G, Zhang AiJun 56(3b):9951001
Lozano-Gutierrez J, Carmona-Sosa F (2010) Hogendorp BK, Cloyd RA, Swiader JM (2006) Effect of
Validation of two pheromonal compounds for moni- nitrogen fertility on reproduction and development of
toring pink hibiscus mealybug in Mexico [Spanish, citrus mealy bug, Planococcus citri Risso (Homoptera:
English]. Agrociencia (Montecillo) 44(1):6573 Pseudococcidae), feeding on two colors of coleus,
Goolsby JA, Rose M, Morrison RK, Woolley JB (2000) Solenostemon scutellarioides L. Codd. Environ
Augmentative biological control of longtailed mealy- Entomol 35:201211
bug by Chrysoperla rulabris (Burmeister) in the inte- Hogendorp BK, Cloyd RA, Swiader JM (2009) Effect of
rior plantscape. Southwest Entomol 25(1):1519 silicon-based fertilizer applications on the reproduc-
Goolsby JA, Kirk AA, Meyerdirk DE (2002) Seasonal tion and development of the citrus mealybug
phenology and natural enemies of Maconellicoccus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) feeding on green coleus.
hirsutus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Australia. J Econ Entomol 102:21982208
Fla Entomol 85:494498 Hollingsworth RG (2005) Limonene, a citrus extract for
Gullan PJ, Kosztarab M (1997) Adaptations in scale control of mealybugs and scale insects. J Econ
insects. Annu Rev Entomol 42:2350 Entomol 98(3):772779
Hall WJ (1920) Report on preliminary campaign against Hollingsworth RG, Hamnett RM (2010) Using food-safe
hibiscus mealybug in the Cairo Nusery gardens. Agric. ingredients to optimize the efcacy of oil-in-water
J. Egypt Cairo 10:16 emulsions of essential oils for control of waxy insects.
Hall WJ (1927) The introduction of Cryptolaemus mon- Acta Horticult 880:399405
trouzieri Muls. into Egypt. Bull Entomol Res Iheagwam EU (1981) Natural enemies and alternative
17:385392 host plant of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus
Hamlen RA (1975) Insect growth regulator control of manihoti (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae) in south-
longtailed mealybug, hemispherical scale and eastern Nigeria. Revue de Zoologie Africaine
Phenacoccus solani on ornamental foliage plants. 95(2):433438
J Econ Entomol 68(2):223226 Ivbijaro MF, Udensis N, Ukwela UM, Anno-Nyako FV
Hamlen RA (1977) Laboratory and greenhouse evalua- (1992) Geographical distribution and host range in
tions of insecticides and insect growth regulators for Nigeria of the mango mealy bug, Rastrococcus
control of foliar and root infesting mealybugs. J Econ invadens Williams, a serious exotic pest of horticul-
Entomol 70(2):211214 ture and other crops. Insect Sci Appl 13(3):411416
Hamon AB (1982) Rhizoecus arabicus Hambleton, a root Jhansi Rani B (2001) Pest management in medicinal,
mealybug in Florida (Homoptera: Coccoidea: ornamental and aromatic crops. In: Paravatha Reddy P,
55 Ornamental Plants 521

Verghese A, Krishna Kumar NK (eds) Integrated pest Mani M (2008) Record of mealybugs (Pseudococcidae:
management in horticultural ecosystems. Capital Homoptera) of ornamentals in India. J Insect Sci
Publishing Company, New Delhi, pp 4676 21:305306
Kawai S, Takagi K (1971) Descriptions of three economi- Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (2003) Biological control of
cally important species of root-feeding mealybugs in vegetable and ornamental crop pests in India. In: Rev.
Japan (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Appl Entomol Fr. S. Ignacimuthu SJ, Jayaraj S (eds) Biological con-
Zool 6(4):175182 trol of insect pests. Phoenix Publishers, New Delhi,
Kumar TS, Sheela MS (2002) Anoop Sankar Occurrence pp 98116
of red cotton bug, Dysdercus cingulatus (Fb.) and Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (2007a) Field efcacy of
white mealy bug, Ferrisia virgata (Ckll.) on Australian ladybird beetle Cryptolaemus montrouzieri
Kurumthotti, Sida rhombifolia L. (Malvaceae) a new Muls. In the suppression of striped mealy bug Ferrisia
report. Insect. Environment 8(4):177 virgata (Ckll.) on tuberose. J Biol Control
Kwon GiMyon, Lee Seung Hwan, Han Man Jong, Goh 21:129131
Hyun Gwan (2002) The genus Pseudococcus Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (2007b) Biological suppres-
(Westwood) (Sternorrhyncha: Pseudococcidae) of sion Planoccous citri (Risso) (Homoptra:
Korea. J Asia Pac Entomol 5(2):145154 Pseudococcidae) on Crossandra undulifolia Salisb in
Labanowski G (2009) Pests of ornamental plants intro- India. J Biol Control 21:283285
duced to Polish glasshouses. [Polish]. Progress Plant Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (2008) Biological suppres-
Protect 49(4):17141723 sion of mealy bug Coccidohystrix insolitus and
Lain HM, Parrella MP (2004) Developmental biology of Maconellicoccus hirsutus on Hibiscus rasa-sinensis.
citrus mealybug under conditions typical of California Indian J Plant Prot 36:3234
rose production. Ann Entomol Soc Am 97:982988 Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A, Shivaraju C (2011)
Lain HM, Gullan PJ, Parrella MP (2004) Mealybug spe- Biological suppression of major mealybug species on
cies (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) found on ornamen- horticultural crops in India. J Hortic Sci 6:85100
tal crops in California nursery production. Proc Mani M, Joshi S, Kalyanasundaram M, Shivaraju C,
Entomol Soc Wash 106(2):475477 Krishnamoorthy A, Asokan R, Rebbith KB (2013) A
Lai Yi Chun, Chang Niann Tai (2007) The association of new invasive Jack Beardsley Pseudococcus jackbeard-
pink hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus sley Gimpel and Miller (Heiptera; Pseudococcidae) on
(Green) with bigheaded ant, Pheidole megacephala papaya in India. Fla Entomol 96(1):242245
(Fabricius) on hibiscus [Chinese]. Form Entomol Manjunath TM (1986) Recent outbreaks of mealybugs
27:229243 and their biological control. In: Jayaraj S (ed)
Lapis EB (1970) The biology of the grey mealybug, Resurgence of sucking pests. Proceedings of National
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) (Pseudococcidae, Symposium. T.N.A.U., Coimbatore, 1986,
Homoptera). Philip Entomol 1(5):397405 pp 249253
Laudonia S, Viggiani G (1986) Natural enemies of the Manjunath D, Prasad KS, Gowda DKS (1992) Ecological
citrophilus mealybug (Pseudococcus calceolariae approach for the management of the mealybug,
Mask.) in Campania. Bollettino del Laboratorio di Maconellicoccus hirsutus causing tukra in mulberry.
Entomologia Agraria Filippo Silvestri, Italy Plant Arch 6(2):767768
43(Suppl):167171 Mari JM, Nizamani SM, Lohar MK (2007) Population
Leandro MJ, Oliveira M, Figueiredo E, Mexia A (2006) uctuation of longtailed mealybug on different orna-
Biological control in Proteaceae: an effort to solve mental plants. Acta Horticult 755:99104
some problems. Acta Horticult 716:127133 Martin NA, Workman PJ (1999) Efcacy of insecticides
Lindquist RK (1979) Insecticide evaluations for spider for longtailed mealybug control. In: Proceedings of
mite, aphid, and mealybug control on selected foliage the fty second New Zealand plant protection confer-
plants in 1978. Ohio Florists Assoc Bull 596:57, 9 ence, Auckland Airport Centra, Auckland, New
Lindquist RK (1981) Introduction of predators for insect Zealand, 1012 August 1999, pp 2224
and mite control on commercial interior plantings. Mastoi MI, Nur Azura A, Muhammad R, Idris AB,
Ohio Florists Association Bulletin 622: 58 Ibrahim Y (2011) First report of Papaya Mealybug
Malumphy C (1997) Imperfect mealybug, Phenacoccus Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera:Pseudococcidae)
defectus Ferris (Homoptera: Coccoidea, from Malaysia. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 5:12471250
Pseudococcidae), a pest of succulent ornamental Matile-Ferrero D, Etienne J (1996) Presence of the hibis-
plants, new to Britain. Entomol Gazette cus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus in Saint-
48(4):285288 Martin (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae) [French]. Revue
Malumphy C (2010) Barber giant mealybug Puto barberi Francaise dEntomologie 18(1):38
(Cockerell) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), a neotropi- Mattiuz CFM, de O Campos LZ, Pinto A de S (2006)
cal pest of ornamental plants established in Gran Survey of residential ornamental potted and landscape
Canaria, Spain. Entomol Monthly Mag plants and associated mealy bugs and scale insects
146(174850):2125 (Insecta, Hemiptera) in Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo
522 V. Sridhar et al.

State, Brazil. [Portuguese]. Revista Brasileira de Pencheva A, Gerasimova N (2006) Study on the species of
Horticultura Ornamental 12:4351 family Pseudococcidae (Hemiptera: Coccoidaea) in
McComie LD, Gosine S, Siew P (1997) The effect of Bulgarian greenhouses. Rastenievdni Nauki
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant) on the hibiscus 43(6):486490
mealy bug Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green), on Price JF (1979) Control of mealy bugs on caladiums. Proc
hibiscus plants in Trinidad. Trop Fruits Newslett Fla State Hortic Soc Publ 92:358360
23:710 Reddy GVP, Muniappan R, Cruz ZT, Naz F, Bamba JP,
Meyerdirk DE, Muniappan R, Warkentin R, Bamba J, Tenorio J (2009) Present status of Maconellicoccus
Reddy GVP (2004) Biological control of the papaya hirsutus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the Mariana
mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Islands and its control by two fortuitously introduced
Pseudococcidae). Plant Prot Q 19:110114 natural enemies. J Econ Entomol 102:14311439
Michaud JP, Evans GA (2000) Current status of pink Rivero Aragon A, Martinez Fuentes E, Grillo Ravelo H
hibiscus mealybug in Puerto Rico including a key to (2000) Hambletonia sp. (Hymenoptera; Encyrtidae),
parasitoid species. Fla Entomol 83(1):97101 parasite of Pseudococcus sp. (Homoptera;
Miller DR, Miller GL (2002) Re-description of Pseudococcidae), new species for Cuba [Spanish].
Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Centro Agricola 27(3):9192
Willink (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), Ronald AH, Fukada MT, Patrick C (2007) Papaya mealy-
including descriptions of the immature stages and bug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de
adult male. Proc Entomol Soc Washington 104:123. Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). New Pest
Quoted in Walker, A., Hoy, M. and Meyerdirk, D.E. Advisory. http://www.hawaiiag.org/hdoa/npa/npa04-
2003 Papaya Mealybug. Univ. Florida Featured 03-PMB.pdf
Creatures. http://creatures.ifas.u.edu/fruit/mealy- Ronse A, Matile-Ferrero D (1991) First observation in
bugs/ papaya_mealybug.htm Belgium of Vryburgia brevicruris (McKenzie), a
Moghaddam M, Alikhani M (2010) Two new species of mealybug pest of succulent plants cultivated under
mealybugs (Hemiptera, Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae) glass (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae). [French]. Revue
from Iran. J Entomol Acarol Res 42(1):1117 Francaise dEntomologie 13(1):3334
Moghaddam M, Bagheri AN (2010) A new record of Sagarra LA, Peterkin DD (1999) Invasion of the Caribbean
mealybug pest in the south of Iran, Phenacoccus sole- by the hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus
nopsis (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae). Green [Homoptera: Pseudococcidae]. Phytoprotection
J Entomol Soc Iran 30(1):6769 80:103113
Muniappan R, Meyerdirk DE, Sengebau FM, Berringer Saini RK, Palaram Sharma SS, Rohilla HR (2009)
DD, Reddy GVP (2006) Classical biological control Mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley and its
of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus survival in cotton ecosystem in Haryana. In:
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the Republic of Proceedings of national symposium on Bt-cotton:
Palau. Fla Entomol 89:212217 opportunities and prospectus, Central Institute of
Muniappan R, Shepard BM, Watson GW, Carner GR, Cotton Research, Nagpur, 1719 Nov, 150 p
Sartiami D, Rauf A, Hammig MD (2008) First report Sakthivel P, Karuppuchamy P, Kalyanasundaram M,
of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Srinivasan T (2012) Host plants of invasive papaya
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), in Indonesia and India. mealy bug Paracoccus marginatus (Willams and
J Agric Urban Entomol 25:3740 Granara de Willink) in Tamil Nadu. Madras Agric
Nagrare VS, Kranthi S, Birder VK, Zade NN, Sangode V, J 99:615619
Kakde G, Shukla RM, Shivare D, Khadi BM, Kranthi Selvaraju NG, Sakthivel N (2011) Host plants of papaya
KR (2009) Widespread infestation of the exotic mealy- mealy bug (Paracoccus marginatus Williams and
bug species, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley Granara de Willink.) in Tamil Nadu. Karnataka J Agric
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on cotton in India. Bull Sci 24:567569
Entomol Res 99(5):537541 Shanthi M, Nalini R, Rajavel DS, Baskaran RKM (2008)
Ordogh G, Takacs A (1983) The effectivity of Pyrotox Occurrence of mealy bug, Ferrisia virgata Cock on
against larvae of scale insects (Pseudococcus mariti- tuberose in Madurai, Tamil Nadu. Insect Envion
mus, Saissetia coffeae, Aspidiotus nerii) damaging 13:149
potted ornamentals [Hungarian]. Novenyvedelem Shylesha AN (2013) Host range of invasive Kack
19(9):417419 Beardsley Pseudococcus jackbeardsley Gimpal and
Pantoja A, Abreu E, Pena J, Robles W (2007) Paracoccus Miller in Karanataka. Pest Manage Hortic Ecosyst
marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink 19(1):106107
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) affecting papaya in Shylesha AN, Joshi S (2012) Occurrence of Madeira
Puerto Rico. J Agric Univ PR 91:223225 mealybug Phenacoccus madeirensis Green
Passarinho AM, Leandro MJ, Oliveira M, Figueiredo E, (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on cotton in India and
Franco JC, Neves-Martins J, Mexia A (2006) record of assiaciated parasitoids. J Biol Control
Parasitism of mealybugs by Anagyrus pseudococci 26(3):272273
(Girault) in Proteaceae [Portuguese]. Boletin de Shylesha AN, Rabindra RJ, Bhumannavar BS (2011)
Sanidad Vegetal, Plagas 32(2):215221 Classical biological control of papaya mealybug
55 Ornamental Plants 523

(Paracoccus marginatus) in India. In: The papaya tem. Technical Bulletin no. 24, National Centre for
mealybug Paracoccus marginatus (Coccoidea: Integrated Pest Management, New Delhi, 39 p
Pseudococcidae). Proceedings of the National consul- Vijay S, Suresh S (2013) Host plants of Phenacoccus spp.
ation meeting on strategies for deployment and impact complex in Tamil Nadu. Karnataka J Agric Sci
of the imported parasitoids of papaya mealybug, 30th 26:147151
October 2010, Bangalore, India, pp 18 Vitullo J, Zhang AJ, Mannion C, Bergh JC (2009)
Southgate BJ (1974) An infestation of mealybug on saxi- Expression of feeding symptoms from pink hibiscus
frages. J R Hortic Soc 99:399400 mealy bug (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) by commer-
Sridhar V, Joshi S, Jhansi Rani B, Kumar R (2012) First cially important cultivars of hibiscus. Fla Entomol
record of the Lantana Mealy bug, Phenacoccus parvus 92:248254
Morrison (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae) as Walker A, Hoy M, Meyerdirk DE (2003) Papaya
a pest of China Aster, Callistephus chinensis (L) Nees Mealybug. University of Florida Featured Creatures.
from south India. J Hortic Sci 7:108109 http://creatures.ifas.u.edu/fruit/mealybugs/papaya_
Suresh S, Mohanasundaram M (1996) Coccoid mealybug.htm
(Coccoidea: Homoptera) fauna of Tamil Nadu, India. Waterworth RA, Redak RA, Millar JG (2011) Pheromone-
J Ent Res New Delhi 20:233274 baited traps for assessment of seasonal activity and
Tang SJ, Qin HZ, Wang JM, Gu P (1992) Studies on the population densities of mealybug species (Hemiptera:
mealy-bug Planococus citri (Risso). [Chinese]. Pseudococcidae) in nurseries producing ornamental
J Shanghai Agric College 10(1):4452 plants. J Econ Entomol 104(2):555565
Tingle CCD, Copland MJW (1988) Effects of temperature Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of south Asia. The Natural
and host-plant on regulation of glasshouse mealybug History Museum/Southdene SDN, BHD, Kuala
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) populations by intro- Lumpur, 896 p
duced parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae. Bull Williams DJ, Hamon AB (1994) Phenacoccus parvus
Entomol Res 78(1):135142 Morrison, a possible injurious mealybug recorded for
Tranfaglia A (1972/1973) Studies on Homoptera the rst time from Florida (Homoptera: Coccoidea:
Coccoidea. I. On the discovery in Campania of Pseudococcidae). Insecta Mundi 8(1/2):16
Pseudococcus obscurus Essig, a species new to the Williams DJ, Matile-Ferrero D (2008) Mealybugs of
Italian fauna. [Italian]. Bollettino del Laboratorio di Mauritius [Hemiptera, Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae].
Entomologia Agraria Filippo Silvestri Portici 30: Revue Francaise dEntomologie 30(2/4):97101
294299 Wu SA, Zhang RZ (2009) A new invasive pest,
Tsalev M (1970) On some mealybug species, Phenacoccus solenopsis threatening seriously to cot-
Pseudococcus spp., in Bulgaria [Bulgarian]. ton production. (In Chinese; Summary in English).
Ovoshcharstvo 17(12):2024 Chinese Bull Entomol 46(1):159162
Tuca OA, Stan C, Mitrea I, Stan I (2010) Quantication of Wu SA, Nan N, Lu Y (2010) Phenacoccus madeirensis
the main harmful species attack on ornamental plants (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), a newly
in greenhouses of the botanical garden alexandra invasive mealybug in mainland China [Chinese].
Buia, Craiova. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Entomotaxonomia 32:812
Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Wysoki M, Izhar Y, Swirski E, Gurevitz E, Greenberg S
Horticulture 67(1):399402 (1977) Susceptibility of avocado varieties to the long-
Ullah GMR, Parveen A (1993) Coccoid pests (scale tailed mealybug, Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni
insects and mealybugs) and their host-plants on Tozzetti) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), and a survey
Chittagong University campus a checklist. of its host plants in Israel. Phytoparasitica
Bangladesh J Zool 21(1):181182 5(3):140148
Vasundhara M, Siddappaji C, Kotikal YK (1990) New Yang JS, Sadof CS (1995) Variegation in Coleus blumei
record of downey snow line mealybug on Jasminum and the life history of citrus mealybug (Homoptera:
rigidum and its predators. Curr Res 19(6):99100 Pseudococcidae). Environ Entomol 24:16501655
Vennila S, Ramamurthy VV, Deshmukh A, Pinjarkar DB, Yang JS, Sadof CS (1997) Variation in the life history of
Agarwal M, Pagar PC, Prasad YG, Prabhakar M, the citrus mealybug parasitoid Leptomastix dactylopii
Kranthi KR, Bambawale OM (2012) A treatise on (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on three varieties of
mealy bugs of Central Indian cotton production sys- Coleus blumei. Environ Entomol 26:978982
Orchids
56
N.K. Meena, R.P. Medhi, and M. Mani

56.1 Species species due to their occurrence in serious propor-


tions in many parts of the world (Bronson 2009).
Mealybugs are serious pests of orchids Only P. dendrobiorum and P. longispinus are
(Table 56.1), and next to scale insects, they are known to infest orchids in greenhouses of tropi-
probably the most difcult to control pests of cal and subtropical regions of India. In most of
orchids in homes and greenhouses. Nearly 300 Canada and the United States, the long-tailed
species of mealybugs are known from Canada mealybug (P. longispinus) is probably the most
and the United States. Fortunately, only a few common and problematic species on orchids,
species are common or serious pests of orchid particularly in homes and greenhouses.
(Johnson 2014). The most important pest of this
crop is the long-tailed mealybug Pseudococcus
longispinus in California and Canada. In Hawaii, 56.2 Nature of Damage
P. longispinus and Dysmicoccus brevipes are
common on orchids (https://www.aos.org/ Mealybugs are not particular about their host, and
Default.aspx id=511). The mealybugs problem probably all species of orchids are susceptible to
are reported on many orchid species like mealybugs, especially when cultivated. The com-
Cymbidium, Dendrobium, Cattleya, Calanthe, mon mealybug species found attacking orchids are
Phaius, Phalaenopsis, Pholidota, etc., world- the citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri, and the
wide. Pineapple mealybug (D.brevipes), long- long-tailed mealybug, P. longispinus. These suck-
tailed mealybug (P. longispinus), jack beardsley ing insects attack any part of the plant, but tend to
mealybug (Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi), stay tucked away at the junction of the leaf and
obscure mealybug (Pseudococcus viburni), and stem. Severe infestations cause chlorotic areas to
orchid mealybugs (Pseudococcus microcirculus appear on the leaves, which may darken, causing
and Pseudococcus dendrobiorum) are the major the leaf to yellow and drop prematurely. After
hatching, crawlers move to nd suitable sites for
N.K. Meena (*) R.P. Medhi feeding. They feed on the tender portions of the
ICAR-National Research Centre for Orchids, plants and also exude a white waxy substance on
Pakyong, Sikkim, India their body, which covers the entire body and gives
e-mail: narottammeena@gmail.com
a mealy appearance. Both nymphs and adults suck
M. Mani the sap from the attacked parts and resulted in loss
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India of vigor and growth, shrinking of pseudobulbs,
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in curling, wilting of plants, and also loss of leaves,

Springer India 2016 525


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_56
526

Table 56.1 List of mealybugs reported on orchids in different regions


Mealybug species Plants Region/country References
Crisicoccus orchidiradicis (Takahashi) Orchids Malaysia Williams (2004)
Chryseococcus arecae (Maskell) Dendrobium New Zealand Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus orchidum sp.n Dendrobium India Thailand Williams (2004)
Phalaenopsis Singapore, Indonesia Williams (2004)
Hypogeococcus baharti (Miller) Orchids Mexico Ben-Dov (1994)
Hypogeococcus gilli (Miller) Orchids Costa Rica Ben-Dov (1994)
Hypogeococcus othnius (Miller Orchids Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
&McKenie)
Hypogeococcus festerianus (Lizery Cactus Australia, Italy Ben-Dov (1994)
Trelles)
Hypogeococcus pungeans (Granara de Cactus Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
Wilink)
Hypogeococcus spinosus (Ferris) Cactus Mexico, California, Japan Ben-Dov (1994)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) Orchids (Laeliocattleya canhamiana alba) Caribbean islands Gautam and Cooper (2003)
Anthurium, Andraeanum, Dendrobium http://manatee.ifas.u.edu/comm-hort/
pdf/pest-topics/InsectPHMHosts.pdf
Paracoccus invectus sp.n Orchids Thailand Ben-Dov (1994)
Dendrobium India
Paracoccus interceptus (Lit.) Dendrobium India, The Philippines Williams (2004)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Orchids Cuba Diaz et al.(2004)
Cacti - Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus dendrobii (Ezzat&Mc Dendrobium The Philippines, India, Thailand Williams (2004)
Connel)
Planococcus hasnyi (Ezzat&Mc 0rchids South Africa Ben-Dov (1994)
Connel)
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Anthurium India Williams (2004)
Planococcus hospitus (De lotto) Orchids Uganda Ben-Dov (1994)
N.K. Meena et al.
Mealybug species Plants Region/country References
56

Planococcus phillipinensis (Ezzat&Mc Orchids The Philippines Ben-Dov (1994)


Connel)
Planococcus ovae (Nasanov) Anthurium Neotropical and Palaearctic region Ben-Dov (1994)
Orchids

Pseudococcus dendrobium (Williams) Dendrobium Australia,Indonesia Ben-Dov (1994))


Orchids India Williams (2004)
Dendrobium Indonesia Williams (2004)
Orchids Malaysia Williams (2004)
Dendrobium The Philippines Williams (2004)
Orchids Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
Orchids Korean Peninsula Kwon GiMyon et al. (2002)
Pseudococcus jackbeardsley (Gimpel Dendrobium Thailand Williams (2004)
and Miller)
Anthurium, Dracaena Hawaii Beardsley (1986)
Pseudococcus importatus (McKenzie) Orchids California Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus microcirculus, Ps. Orchids California https://www.aos.org/Default.
importatus, Ps. viburni, Dysmicoccus aspx?id=511
brevipes, Phenacoccus solani
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell), Orchids Hawaii https://www.aos.org/Default.
Pseudococcus dendrobiorum, aspx?id=511
Pseudococcus jackbeardsley (Gimpel
and Miller) Pseudococcus maritimus
(Ehrhorn)
Pseudococcus dendrobiorum (Williams) Cymbidium India
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Cattleya, Dendrobium, Bulbophyllum, India
Tozzetti) Calanthe, Coelogyne, Phaius, Phalaenopsis,
Oncidium
(continued)
527
Table 56.1 (continued)
528

Mealybug species Plants Region/country References


Pseudococcus microcirculus Ansellia, Cattleya, Oncidium Northern Italy Camporese and Scaltriti (1991).
(McKenzie) Orchids California and Florida Camporese and Scaltriti (1991)
Pseudococcus maritimus complex (P. Orchids The United States Gimpel and Miller (1996)
microcirculus and P. sorghiellus (Forbes
)
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Orchids Phalaenopsis Germany Lindemann and Richter (2007)
Tozzetti) Odontoglossum France Jullien (2009)
Phalaenopsis Taiwan Yang (1997)
Phalaenopsis Indonesia Williams (2004)
Orchids Canada and the United States https://www.aos.org/Default.
aspx?id=511
Orchids Cuba Diaz et al.(2004)
Pseudococcus orchidicola Takshashi Orchids New Zealand and Pacic region Ben-Dov (1994)
N.K. Meena et al.
56 Orchids 529

ower buds, owers, and premature senescence. provides a substrate for the development of sooty
Such types of plants produce inferior quality ow- mould, which affects the rate of photosynthesis in
ers. In addition, mealybugs also produce honey- plants. Some species of mealybugs play a role as
dew, which makes the plant parts sticky, and vectors in the transmission of viral disease.

Mealybug damage to orchids

P. longispinus (Photo by Fowler) Mealybug on Dendrobium Ferrisia on orchids

Phalaenopsis with mealybug Mealybug on Angraecum Mealybug on Cattleya

Mealybug on Lycaste Mealybug on Cymbidium Mealybug on Oncidium


530 N.K. Meena et al.

Mealybug infestation on Phaius ower bud Mealybug on leaf sheath of Phaius Mealybugon Cattleya leaf

All stages of the bug suck the sap from the plant temperatures, wind velocity, etc.) help to keep the
parts and secrete honeydew. Sooty mould develops population low or below economic injury level.
on the leaves in case of severe infestation. Attacked
plants look withered, reduced in growth with chlo-
rotic and deformed leaves. They prefer to live on 56.4 Mode of Mealybug Spread
roots deep in the media and are often only discov-
ered when orchids are repotted, though they will Orchids become infested with mealybugs in three
also attack other parts of the plant, especially under different ways: purchase of infested planting
the leaves. They will also hide in depressions on material, movement from infested to uninfested
pots, in sheaths, and in newly emerging growths plants, and windblown colonization. The occur-
(http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art66287. rence of P. microcirculus is reported on the roots
asp). Imported exotic plants are inspected to pre- of orchids belonging to the genera Ansellia,
vent the accidental introduction of mealybugs in Cattleya, and Oncidium in the greenhouses in
Brazil (Camporese and Scaltriti 1991). The adult northern Italy (Lombardy). The orchids involved
females and nymphs of P. dendrobiorum are known had been recently imported from Brazil. With the
to infest leaves and roots of orchids in the green- entry of infested plants in an area where unin-
houses in the central part of the Korean Peninsula fested orchids are grown, juvenile mealybugs
(Kwon GiMyon et al. 2002). spread by crawling from one plant to another
plant through operational tools, irrigating water,
wind, pots, and potting media. Excess roots,
56.3 Seasonal Development dried leaves, pseudobulbs, and other wastage
thrown during repotting in the nearby areas are
The orchids are generally grown in greenhouses other most important modes of transportation of
or partially shaded net houses (under controlled mealybugs. Shifting of plants from one poly-
conditions), wherein mealybug species are active house to another polyhouse or from one place to
in warm climate (temperature range 2530 C), another place also plays a role in the spreading of
but in cold climate, when temperature goes below this pest. Sometimes, these mealybugs survive on
10 C, these mealybug species become less active unwanted plants (weeds), which provide suitable
and hide in protected places, such as among niche during unavailability of host or complete
roots, deep inside potting media, on pseudobulbs few stages of their life cycle during adverse con-
covering with scales, below leaf sheaths, and ditions and then migrate on the orchids. Ants that
other tight places. In open eld conditions, are attracted by honeydew produced by mealy-
mealybugs are susceptible to a variety of natural bugs can also be spread by crawling from one
enemies (predators and parasitoids), and weather plant to other plants.
factors (heavy rainfall, extremely high and low
56 Orchids 531

56.5 Management particularly under direct sunlight or high heat,


and while certain species may not react to a
The common mealybug species found attacking given formulation, others may; so, testing is
orchids are the citrus mealybug, Planococcus justiable.
citri, and the long-tailed mealybug, P. longispi- In case of severe infestation, uses of selective
nus. Prompt collection and destruction of infested synthetic insecticides have great potential for
parts reduce the spread of the pest. It is very mealybug management in orchids. Initially, two
important to immediately start intervention as foliar sprays of chlorpyriphos 20 EC 2.5 ml/lit. at
soon as these pests are spotted, or else, they might 15 days interval provided protection for ants that
spread rapidly and could overtake the collection attract on plants due to honeydew secretion.
in a matter of weeks. If there are only a few There are few insecticides viz. acephate 75 SP
mealybugs, a Q-tip dipped in isopropyl alcohol 0.035 %, imidacloprid 17.8 SL 0.3 ml/lit., mala-
or toothbrush dipped in a pesticide solution can thion 50 EC 2.5 ml/lit., bifenthrin 10 EC 0.25 %,
be used. For prevention of mealybugs, it is and monocrotophos 36 EC 1.5 ml/lit, which were
advised to remove old leaves and ower sheaths tested and found effective for the control of
to eliminate the hiding places and allow easy mealybugs in orchids. Monocrotophos 36 EC
inspection. New plants are to be checked care- 0.02 % + phorate 10 G + neem cake can be recom-
fully before adding them to the growing area. mended to control Dysmicoccus brevipes
These mealybugs are yellow-coloured with a (Mandal 2009), and profenophos and methyl
covering of white powdery wax. (https://www. parathion on P. solenopsis (Mahalakshmi et al.
aos.org/Default.aspx?id=511). 2010) can also be used for the mealybugs infest-
ing orchids. Chemical insecticides generally pro-
duce phytotoxic symptoms on owers; so, the
56.6 Insecticides basic rule is that any insecticide that is not spe-
cically recommended/labeled for ornamental
Persistent populations of mealybugs or infesta- plants should never be used.
tion in many plants may demand the need for use When ants are noticed on the plants, spraying
of synthetic insecticides. There are several com- should be taken up with dichlorvos (76 EC)
mon, inexpensive, home-use andgarden-use pes- 1 ml/l followed by profenofos (50 EC) @ 1.5 ml/l
ticides labeled for ornamental plants. Insecticide or methomyl (40 SP) 2 g/l or acephate (75 SP)
formulations not labeled for ornamental plants 1.5 g/l. Pongamia oil or neem oil 10 ml/l are also
are often mixed with solvents that aid in the effective in checking pest buildup in India. Neem
application of the active ingredient for specic oil (azadirachtin 0.03 % EC) @ 35 ml/lit,
purposes. These solvents, not necessarily the tobacco leaf extract 5 %, and Artimessia leaf
insecticide itself, often produce phytotoxicity extract 10 % were tested against mealybug on
and may seriously damage or kill plants. Thus, Cymbidium orchid and found effective for mealy-
any insecticide that is not specically labeled for bug suppression. Lindemann and Richter (2007)
ornamental plants should never be used. Some of stressed the use of Azadirachtin as biochemical
the more available and effective insecticides that control of P. longispinus on Phalaenopsis
come in various brand names are acephate, mala- orchids.
thion, carbaryl, and diazinon. Pyrethrins and
rotenone have limited effectiveness. Label direc-
tions should always be followed, and the mini- 56.7 Repotting
mum recommended concentration given in
mixing directions should never be exceeded! Even a light-to-moderate infestation of mealy-
Recommended solutions are based on extensive bugs should be of concern. These insects like to
testing for selected pests and plants. Orchids are move into the potting media and feed on roots, or
tough plants, but are sensitive to many chemicals, move off from the plant to nd hiding places to
532 N.K. Meena et al.

lay eggs. Unless the roots are checked and the application is less than botanical oils. Kinoprene
media changed, removal of mealybugs from only (tradename = Enstar II) is a synthetic form of
the upper plant portions is not a guarantee of suc- juvenile hormone, which is highly important in
cess. The potting medium can harbor eggs and insects at critical stages of their metamorphosis.
crawlers, so they should be disposed in a compost The use of kinoprene interrupts the normal devel-
pile or in the garbage. When repotting, a close opment of the insects, including mealybugs,
inspection, and, if necessary, a very gentle clean- scales, aphids, and whiteies. This insect hor-
ing and spraying of the roots before repotting are mone appears safe for humans and pets under
essential (https://www.aos.org/Default. usual use precautions. Experience on its use in
aspx?id=511). greenhouses and home collections suggest that
this may be the best new-generation pesticide for
controlling many orchid pests, including
56.8 Oils and Soaps mealybugs. Bifenthrin and other growth regula-
tors are also available for use on ornamentals, but
Horticultural oil, neem oil, mineral oil, and insec- little information is available for their use on
ticidal soaps are effective for mealybug suppres- orchids. Some of these new chemicals are very
sion. They are generally considered safe for effective, but are also highly regulated, and may
humans, pets, and plants than the usual insecti- not be available in some states for noncommer-
cides. None provide absolute control over mealy- cial uses. Azadirachtin (trade names = Azatin and
bugs, but frequent use during the presence of Neemazad) is a plant-derived chemical that is a
crawlers can serve to reduce their populations chitin inhibitor. Chitin is a primary compound
dramatically. The main caution with these oil used by insects when developing their integu-
solutions is that they should never be applied to ment or exoskeleton. Azadirachtin reduces the
plants on hot days (85 F) or in direct sunlight, as insects ability to properly develop its integument
to prevent burning of tissues (https://www.aos. and causes mortality through incomplete devel-
org/Default.aspx?id=511). opment. There is little information available on
this chemical for use on orchids, but more infor-
mation is available on its use on a wide variety of
56.9 Rubbing with Alcohol ornamentals, and is labeled for greenhouse appli-
cations, but may be too expensive for most home
As an orchid is a hard-leaved plant, gentle rub- greenhouse uses (https://www.aos.org/Default.
bing of leaves with cotton swabs dipped in aspx?id=511).
6070 % isopropyl alcohol gives satisfactory
results against mealybugs. If infestation occurred
in the root zone, inside potting media, the plants 56.11 Biological Control
should be removed immediately from the infested
media, and the roots should be sprayed with Use of natural enemies (parasitoids, predators,
chemical insecticides Further, repotting with and pathogens) for the management of mealy-
fresh media provides control measures to the pest bugs is the most effective and long-term solution
(https://www.aos.org/Default.aspx?id=511). in any crop ecosystem. Biological control agents
that are available commercially include a variety
of tiny parasitic wasps, brown lacewings, green
56.10 Growth Regulators lacewings, and lady beetles. The coccinellid bee-
and Chitin Inhibitors tles like Cheilomenes sexmaculata, Coccinella
septempunctata, and Cryptolaemun montrouzieri
These classes of insecticides have great potential are important predators of mealybugs (Lindemann
for use in orchid pest management. Growth regu- and Richter 2007). Cryptolaemun montrouzieri
lators are relatively expensive, but the cost per and Chrysoperla carnea larvae have been used as
56 Orchids 533

successful biological control agents of P. longis- (and money!), and such use allows resistant
pinus in potted Phalaenopsis orchids. mealybugs to develop. Finally, keep up the man-
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri was used to control ual removal of all mealybugs, if possible.
P. longispinus on the orchids in Germany Mealybugs are an excellent example of pests that
(Lindemann and Richter 2007). Pseudococcus are easily transported and that create tremendous
maritimus is becoming serious on the orchids in problems. Though most orchid keepers in North
India. Cryptolaemus montrouzieri can be tried America obtain their plants from conscientious
against all the arboreal mealybug species. growers in either Canada or the United States,
many persons do purchase plants while traveling,
in exchange from friends, or from questionable
56.12 General Management sources. Everyone needs to be aware of the great
Practices potential of inadvertently dispersing species to
new areas, particularly from international ori-
Heavy infestations of mealybugs, especially on gins. There cannot be enough stress placed on
many plants, require severe control methods the recommendation that all plants come from
using insecticides. On the extreme side, if a plant a reputable and quality grower, and are clean
shows signs of decline from infestation, then it is of pests.
seriously advised to destroy that plant, as the low
likelihood of rejuvenating that plant may not jus-
tify the expense and effort of continued treat-
ments. Also, destruction of a sick plant can be
References
used to justify the purchase of a new and health- Beardsley JW (1986) Taxonomic Notes on Pseudococcus
ier plant. If the mealybugs persist for long peri- elisae Borchsenius, a Mealybug New to the Hawaiian
ods of time (e.g., >9 months) even with the usage Fauna (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Proc Hawaiian
of the same insecticidal control method, then it Entomol Soc 26:3134
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
means probably that the mealybugs might have bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
developed a resistant population. The best resolu- Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
tion to this is to change the methods and chemi- ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
cals. The same chemical should not be used more importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
Bronson CH (2009) An orchid mealybug, Pseudococcus
than three to four times sequentially. After isolat- dendrobiorum Williams (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae).
ing the infested plants, it is suggested to give Pest Alert, Florida Department of Agriculture and
them a thorough application of something differ- Consumer Service, Florida, pp 13
ent from what has been used. For example, if Camporese P, Scaltriti GP (1991) Occurrence of
Pseudococcus microcirculus McKenzie (Homoptera:
insecticide is used, then switch on to an oil, soap, Coccoidea) on greenhouse cultivated orchids. Inf
or different insecticide. Resistance is not gener- Fitopatol 41(11):5961
ally a problem with growth regulators, such as Diaz A, Abreu N, Martin J, Suarez GM (2004) Hemiptera
kinoprene. Generally, an insecticide not labeled associated with wild orchids. Fitosanidad 8(2):4344
Gautam RD, Cooper B (2003) Insecticidal dip of some
for orchids should never be used. Whenever tropical cut owers for quarantine security against
using oils, soaps, and insecticides, be thorough, pink Hibiscus mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus.
change formulations frequently, and do not use Indian J Entomol 65(2):259263
less than the minimum concentration of mixture, Gimpel WF Jr, Miller DR (1996) Systematic analysis of
the mealybugs in the Pseudococcus aritimus complex
or more than that is normally recommended. Too (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Contrib Entomol Int
little of a chemical enhances resistance, while too 2(1):1163
high of a concentration may damage the plant. GiMyon K, Hwan LS, Jong HM, Gwan GH (2002) The
Unless you are a commercial grower rotating genus Pseudococcus (Westwood) (Sternorrhyncha:
Pseudococcidae) of Korea. J Asia Pac Entomol
mixtures of chemicals, do not use chemicals pro- 5(2):145154
phylactically, that is, do not routinely use chemi- Johnson PJ (2014) Mealybugs on Orchids. https://www.
cals as a preventative, as it is a waste of chemical aos.org/Default.aspx?id=511
534 N.K. Meena et al.

Jullien J (2009) What is your diagnosis? [French] Quel est Mandal D (2009) Eco-friendly management of
votre diagnostic? PHM Revue Horticole 510:4547 mealybug and wilt in pineapple. J Plant Prot Sci
Lindemann S, Richter E (2007) Biological control of 1(1):4043
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Tozzetti) in Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Phalaenopsis hybrids. Nachrichtenbl Dtsch Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
Panzenschutzdienst 59(4):7786 London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Mahalakshmi V, Kalyanasundaram M, Karuppuchamy P, Yang SL (1997) Insect pests and harmful animals
Kannan M (2010) Biology and management of cotton of Phalaenopsis and their infestation habits.
mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley Report of the Taiwan Sugur Research Institute,
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Entomon 35(2):7379 Taiwan, pp 4968
Medicinal Plants
57
V. Sridhar, L.S. Vinesh, and M. Mani

Mealybugs are injurious to several medicinal and farmyard manure (FYM) (12.5 t/ha) + Azophos (2
aromatic plants. Though medicinal and aromatic kg/ha) + neem cake (1000 kg/ha) and need-based
plants play an important role in public healthcare foliar application of neem oil (3 %) to be very
globally, they are affected by several mealybug effective in reducing the incidence of mealybug.
species. Incidence of P. solenopsis was observed Striped mealybug, Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell)
on a wide range of medicinal plants. Symptoms is another mealybug species, which causes dam-
of damage observed on these plants were twisted age on Aswagandha by sucking the sap from the
and dried leaves and shoot, white uffy mass on lower surfaces of leaves and pods during
stems, distorted or bushy shoots, presence of OctoberFebruary (Kumar 2007; Ramanna
honeydew, black sooty mould, small deformed 2009). Maximum population of 18 mealybugs
fruits, etc. (Chaudhary 2013). Various species of per plant was recorded during December 2008,
mealybugs recorded on medicinal plants and and the infested leaves turned yellowish and
cropwise options for their management are pre- dried up. Natural incidence of the predator
sented below. Cryptolaemus montrouzieri was observed on this
mealybug from Karnataka, India. Activity of
predators gradually increased from November
57.1 Aswagandha 2008 to January 2009 and then declined from
February 2009 onward (Ramanna 2009).
Coccidohystrix insolita (Green) (=Phenacoccus Solenopsis mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis
insolitus; Centrococcus insolitus) is one of the (Tinsley), was reported on Aswagandha from
key pests on Aswagandha (Withania somnifera) Tamil Nadu (Selvaraju and Sakthivel 2011).
(Williams 2004). Since Aswagandha is a herbal Abbas et al. (2010) reported a mean infestation of
medicine, application of synthetic chemicals 41 % by this mealybug on Aswagandha.
leads to accumulation of toxic residues. Hence, Papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus
organic pest management including very safe (Williams Granara de Willink), an invasive pest
chemicals is the only option for this crop. was recorded in Tamil Nadu, India, in 2008, on
Ravikumar et al. (2008) found the application of papaya, and has attained the status of a serious
pest on a wide range of host plants, including
Aswagandha (Sakthivel et al. 2012; Selvaraju
V. Sridhar (*) L.S. Vinesh M. Mani
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, and Sakthivel 2011).
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: vsridhar@iihr.ernet.in

Springer India 2016 535


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_57
536 V. Sridhar et al.

57.1.1 Indian acalypha, Acalypha Paracoccus marginatus from Tamil Nadu


indica (Selvaraju and Sakthivel 2011).

Striped mealybug, Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) is


a major pest on Acalypha indica. Release of 57.1.2 Decalepis hamiltonii
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri resulted in complete
clearing of these mealybugs within 40 days of Mango mealybug, Rastrococcus iceryoides
release (Mani 2008). Coccidohystrix insolita also (Green), is observed as the major mealybug on
damages this plant. Spalgis epius is the common this plant. Release of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri
predator recorded on these mealybugs. Other reduced mealybug population from 48.75/plant
mealybugs recorded on this plant include in January to 1.26/plant in March (Mani et al.
Phenacoccus solenopsis, P. madeirensis and 2011).

Cryptyolaemus feeding on C. insolita on coleus Rastrococcus ceryoides on Decalepis namiltoni

57.1.3 Coleus (Sakthivel et al. 2012; Selvaraju and Sakthivel


2011). Phenacoccus solenopsis is reported on S.
Medicinal coleus (Coleus forskohlii) is an impor- nigrum from Tamil Nadu (Vijay and Suresh
tant medicinal crop, which contains forskolin in 2013a, b) and Pakistan (Arif et al. 2009).
their roots. Coccidohystrix insolita is the impor-
tant pest on C. forskohlii, and also on C. aromati-
cus (Vijay and Suresh 2013a). Release of C. 57.1.5 Tulsi, Ocimum sanctum
montrouzieri reduced mealybug population
within 40 days (Mani et al. 2011) on Coleus. Paracoccus marginatus in India is reported on
Ocimum sanctum (Tanwar et al. 2010) and P. sole-
nopsis on O. basilicum in Pakistan (Arif et al. 2009).
57.1.4 Black night shade, Solanum
nigrum
57.1.6 Turmeric, Curcuma longa
Solanum nigrum is an important ingredient in tra-
ditional Indian medicines. Papaya mealybug, Papaya mealybug, P. marginatus, was reported
Paracoccus marginatus, is an invasive pest on turmeric from Tamil Nadu (Selvaraju and
recorded on black night shade in Tamil Nadu Sakthivel 2011).
57 Medicinal Plants 537

57.1.7 Neem, Azadirachta indica 57.2 Gulancha, Tinospora


cordifolia
In Tamil Nadu, India, Pseudococcus gilbertensis
(Beardsley) (Karthikeyan et al. 1993) and Incidence of spherical mealybug Nipaecoccus
Paracoccus marginatus (Sakthivel et al. 2012; viridis (Newstead) on Tinospora cordifolia
Selvaraju and Sakthivel 2011) are known to was recorded from Bangalore, India (Saroja
attack neem. Maconellicoccus hirsutus was also et al. 2013). This pest also attacks other
reported on this plant by Williams (1986). medicinal crops, viz., Leucas aspera, Mimosa
pudica, and Phyllanthus emblica (Vijay and
Suresh 2013a; Williams 2004). Thick clusters
57.1.8 Sweet Indian Mallow, Abutilon of cotton-like masses were seen on leaves and
indicum vines. The mealybug population ranged at an
average of 1012 mealybugs per leaf. The
Paracoccus marginatus and Phenacoccus sole- infested leaves showed symptoms of chlorosis
nopsis were reported on this crop from Tamil on leaves and drying. The honeydew excretion
Nadu (Selvaraju and Sakthivel 2011), and P. sole- was heavy, which attracted ants, and served as
nopsis from Pakistan (Arif et al. 2009). Percentage a medium for sooty mould development
infestation by P. solenopsis was recorded as 7.6 (Saroja et al. 2013).
by Abbas et al. (2010) from Pakistan.

57.1.9 Indian gooseberry,


Phyllanthus emblica

Spherical mealybug, Nipaecoccus viridis, is


known to feed on this plant (Ramadasan and
Harikumar 2011; Vijay and Suresh 2013a, b;
Williams 2004). Of late, E. ofcinalis is grown
widely for export purpose, for its medicinal prop-
erties, and is grown in all altitudes, and wide-
spread occurrence was noticed in other parts of
the country. E. ofcinalis, being grown as rain- Nipaecoccus viridis on T. cordifolia
fed crop under water-stressed conditions, paved
way for the multiplication of insects. Improper
use of insecticides also resulted in increased inci- 57.2.1 Lavender
dence of mealybugs in E. ofcinalis. The popula-
tion is higher in hot climatic conditions coupled Eriococcus munroi (Boratynski) is known to
with high relative humidity (Vijay and Suresh damage Lavender (Lavandula spica) in France
2013a). (Matile-Ferrero and Germain 2004).
Apart from the various crops mentioned
above, there are so many hosts recorded from dif-
57.1.10 Indian Senna, Cassia ferent medicinal and aromatic plants for various
angustifolia mealybugs by different authors. Countries or
places of their records with their host plants are
Papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus, an presented in Table 57.1, along with the names of
invasive mealybug, was recorded as a pest on this authors.
medicinal plant from Tamil Nadu (Selvaraju and
Sakthivel 2011).
538 V. Sridhar et al.

Table 57.1 Various medicinal and aromatic plants infested with different mealybugs
Mealybugs Country/Medicinal plants, where recorded References
Paracoccus marginatus (Williams India Selvaraju and Sakthivel
Granara de Willink) (2011), Tanwar et al.
(2010)
Achyranthes aspera; Alternanthera sessilis:
Amaranthus viridis; Amaranthus spinosus;
Boerhavia diffusa; Calotropis gigantea; Cassia
angustifolia; Celosia argentea; Cleome
gynandra; Cleome viscose; Crotalaria retusa;
Glinus lotoides; Guettarda speciosa; Jatropha
gossypiifolia; Leucas aspera; Lippia nodiora;
Physalis minimam; Phyllanthus fraternus;
Phyllanthus amarus; Pulmonaria longifolia;
Solanum xanthocarpum; Tephrosia purpurea;
Trianthema portulacastrum; Tribulus terrestris;
Wedelia chinensis; Canthium inerme;
Phyllanthus niruri; Convolvulus arvensis;
Commelina benghalensis
India Chellappan et al. (2013)
Adhatoda vasica Nees, Alstonia scholaris (L.)
R. Br., Rauvola serpentina (L.),Benth. Ex.
Kurz, Cyanthillium cinereum (L.) H. Rob,
Bauhinia variegata, Ficus exasperate,
Azadirachta indica, Ocimum sanctum,
Couroupita guianensis, Indigofera tinctoria,
Cassia occidentalis, Phyllanthus amarus,
Phyllanthus fraternus, Datura stramonium,
Ghana Cham et al. (2011)
Wedelia trilobata; Sida sp.
Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) India Vennila et al. (2013), Vijay
and Suresh (2013a) and
Vijay and Suresh (2013b),
Nagrare et al. (2009), Saini
et al. (2009)
(continued)
57 Medicinal Plants 539

Table 57.1 (continued)


Mealybugs Country/Medicinal plants, where recorded References
Trianthema portulacastrum; Commelina
bengalensis; Sida cordifolia; Portulaca
grandiora; Corchorus trilocularis ;Boerhavia
diffusa; Phyllanthus niruri; Acmella uliginosa;
Abelmoschus culneu; Lactuca runcinata;
Digera muricata; Asteracantha longifolia;
Triumfetta rhomboidea; Pentanema indicum;
Aerva lanata; Phyllanthus amarus; Sida acuta;
Phyllanthus reticulatus; Corchorus
trilocularis; Euphorbia geniculata; Portulaca
oleracea; Acalypha india; Solanum trilobatum;
Datura metel; Ocimum basilicum; Ocimum
sanctum; Rhinocanthus nasutus; Andrographis
paniculata; Solanum khasianum; Abrus
precatorius; Artemisia nilagria; Solanum
nigrum;Amaranthus sp.; Gymnea sylvestris;
Vitex leooryxylon; Strilobanthus cilatus;
Acerva lanata; Artemesia nilagiria; Vernonia
cineria; Cassia occidentalis; Cleome viscosa;
Eleusine indica; Coleus forskohli; Coleus
aromaticus; Leucas aspera; Mentha longifolia;
Piper longum; Plumbago zeylanica; Vitex
negundo; Vitex leooryxylon; Tribulus terrestris
India, Gujarat Chaudhary (2013)
Hibiscus sabdariffa, Hibiscus rosa- sinensis,
Abutilon indicum, Sida cordata, Abelmoschus
moschatus, Artemisia annua, Tagetus erecta,
Tagetus minuta, Chrysanthemum maximum,
Parthenium hysterophorus, Cestium diumum,
Datura metel, Withania somnifera, Solanum
khasianum, Cestrurn noctumum, Solanum
nigrum, Commiphora wightii, Murraya
koenigii, Plantago indica, Tinospora
cordifolia, Adhatoda vasica, Boerhaavia
diffusa, Merremia turpethum, Rosa damascene,
Vetiveria zizanioides,Cymbopogon
uxeouuses,Abrus precatorius, Desmodium
gangeticum,Cyamopsis tetragonopoloba,
Achyranthes aspera,Mimosa pudica,Crataeva
nurvala, Plumbago zeylanica,Kicloxia incana,
Kicloxia ossisima, Lantana camera,Gymnema
syltvestre
Pakistan Arif et al.(2009)
Achyranthes aspera; Amaranthus viridis;
Phyllanthus niruri; Mentha longifolia;
Ocimum basilicum; Portulaca oleracea;
Datura metel; Solanum nigrum
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) India Singh and Ghosh (1970);
Clerodendron infortunatum; Erythrina Ghose (1972), Fletcher
variegate; Eugenia jambolana; Glyricidia (1919); Mani (1986); Rao
sepium; Hibiscus acetosella; Hibiscus et al. (1984); Babu and
cannabinus; Hibiscus sabdariffa; Mikania Azam (1987); Ghose
cordata; Phyllanthus niruri; Portulaca (1961); Dutt et al. (1951);
oleracea; Portulaca quadrida; Spondias Balikai (1999); Balikai and
dulcis; Zizyphus mauritiana Bagali (2000)
(continued)
540 V. Sridhar et al.

Table 57.1 (continued)


Mealybugs Country/Medicinal plants, where recorded References
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) India Vijay and Suresh (2013b)
Ocimum sanctum
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Ocimum sanctum Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Ocimum sanctum Ben-Dov (1994)
Paraputo odontomachi (Takahshi) India, Philippines, Indonesia, Singapore and Williams 2004
Vietnam
Garcinia
Rastrococcus iceryoides (Green) India Vijay and Suresh(2013b)
Leucas aspera
Coccidohystrix insolita (Green) India Vijay and Suresh (2013b)
Solanum khasianum
Coleus aromaticus
Nipaecoccus sp., Paracoccus sp., Spain Martinez et al. (2010)
and Phenacoccus sp. Lippia alba, L. geminate, Ocimum sanctum
Nipaecoccus viridis India Williams (2004)
Ocimum sanctum
Rhizoecus dianthi (Green) Withania somnifera Ben-Dov (1994)
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) India Vijay and Suresh (2013a)
Leucas aspera, Mimosa pudica, and
Phyllanthus emblica
India Varshney (1992), Ben-Dov
Nerium oleander (1994), Williams (2004)
Asia Williams (2004)
Embelica ofcinalis and Leucas aspera
Abrus precatorius Ben-Dov (1994)

Rastrococcus iceryoides infested Nipaecoccus viridis Ferrisia virgata on Vinca rosea


Leucas aspera infested Phyllanthus emblica
57 Medicinal Plants 541

References Kumar HR (2007) Survey of pests of medicinal plants


with special reference to biology and management of
Epilachna beetle, Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata
Abbas G, Arif MJ, Ashfaq M, Aslam M, Saeed S (2010)
Fabricius (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on
Host plants, distribution and overwintering of cotton
Ashwagandha. M.Sc. (Agri) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci.,
mealy bug (Phenacoccus solenopsis); Hemiptera:
Dharwad (India).
Pseudococcidae. Int J Agric Biol 12:421425
Mani M (1986) Distribution, bioecology and management
Arif MI, Raq M, Ghaffar A (2009) Host plants of cotton
of grape mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green)
mealy bug (Phenacoccus solenopsis): a new menace
with special reference to its natural enemies. Ph.
to cotton agro ecosystem of Punjab, Pakistan. Int
D. Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Bangalore (India)
J Agric Biol 11:163167
Mani M (2008) Record of mealybugs (Pseudococcidae:
Babu TR, Azam KM (1987) Studies on biology, host spec-
Homoptera) of ornamentals in India. J Insect Sci
trum and seasonal population uctuation of the mealy-
21:305306
bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) on grapevine.
Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A, Shivaraju C (2011)
Indian J Hortic 44:284288
Biological suppression of major mealy bug species on
Balikai RA (1999) New record of alternate host plants of
horticultural crops in India. J Hortic Sci 6:85100
grape mealy bug. Insect Environ 5:81
Martinez M, de Los A, Blanco E (2010) Mealybug
Balikai RA, Bagali AN (2000) Population density of
(Hemiptera: Coccoidea) associated to medicinal plants
mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus on ber (Zizyphus
[Spanish]. Revista de Proteccion Vegetal 25(1):6768
mauritiana) and economic losses. Agric Sci Dig
Matile-Ferrero D, Germain JF (2004) Eriococcus munroi
20:6263
(Boratynski), new pest on Lavandin in France, and
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
note on two mealybugs new for France (Hemiptera,
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
Eriococcidae and Pseudococcidae) [French]. Bull Soc
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
Entomol France 109(2):191192
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
Nagrare VS, Kranthi S, Biradar VK, Zade NN, Sangode V,
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
Kakde G, Shukla M, Shirave D, Khadi BM, Kranthi
Cham D, Davis H, Obeng-Ofori D, Owusu E (2011) Host
KR (2009) Widespread infestation of the exotic mealy-
Range of the Newly Invasive Mealy bug Species
bugs species, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley
Paracocccus marginatus Williams and Granara De
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on cotton in India. Bull
Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Two
Entomol Res 1:15
Ecological Zones of Ghana. Res Zool 1:17
Ramadasan K, Harikumar KB (2011) Phyllanthus
Chaudhary V (2013) Cotton mealybug Phenacoccus sole-
Species: Scientic Evaluation and Medicinal
nopsis Tinsley on medicinal and aromatic plants in
Applications, CRC Press, Health & Fitness 393p
cotton agroecosystem of Gujarat. Insect Environ
Ramanna D (2009) Investigations on pests of madicinal
18(3/4):9294
plants and their management with special reference to
Chellappan M, Lawrence L, Indhu P, Cherian T, Anitha S,
Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera (Linn.). Thesis
Jimcymaria T (2013) Host range and distribution pat-
submitted to University of Agricultural Sciences,
tern of papaya mealy bug, Paracoccus marginatus
Dharwad for M. Sc. (Ag) in Ag. Entomology,88p.
Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera :
Rao PRM, Kanakaraju A, Appa Rao RV, Azam KM (1984)
Pseudococcidae) on selected Euphorbiaceae hosts in
New record of predators on mealy bug of mesta. Qutly
Kerala. J Trop Agric 51(12):5159
News lett Pl Prote Comm 27:12
Dutt N, Mukerjee PK, Sen Gupta N (1951) Preliminary
Ravikumar A, Rajendran R, Chinniah C, Irulandi S, Pandi
observations on the incidence of Phenacoccus hirsu-
R (2008) Evaluation of certain organic nutrient sources
tus Green and its effect on the growth of Hibiscus sab-
against mealybug, Coccidohystrix insolitus (Green.)
dariffa L. var altissima hort. Indian J Agric Sci
and the spotted leaf beetle, Epilachna vigintioctopunc-
21:231237
tata Fab. on Ashwagandha, Withania somnifera Dunal.
Fletcher TB (1919) Report of the Imperial Entomologist.
J Pestic 1:2831
Scientic Report of Agricultural Research Institute,
Saini RK, Pala Ram, Sharma SS, Rohilla HR (2009)
Pusa for 191819, pp. 86103.
Mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley) and its
Ghose SK (1961) Studies of some coccids (Coccoidea:
survival in cotton ecosystem in Haryana. Proc Nation
Hemiptera) of economic importance in West Bengal,
Symp. Bt Cotton: Opportunities Prospects, Cent Inst
India. Indian Agric 5:5778
Cot Res, Nagpur, p102.
Ghose SK (1972) Biology of the mealybug,
Sakthivel P, Karuppuchamy P, Kalyanasundaram M,
Maconellicoccus hirsutus. Indian Agric 16:323332
Srinivasan T (2012) Host plants of invasive papaya.
Karthikeyan K, Rangarajan AV, Velusamy R (1993) Major
Madras Agric J 99:615619
pests of neem and their management in southern Tamil
Saroja S, Kamala Jayanthi PD, Verghese A, Ranganath
Nadu. Abstr World Neem Conf Feb. 2428, Bangalore,
HR, Mani M (2013) Incidence of spherical mealybug
India, Indian Society of Tobacco Science,
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) on medicinal plant
Rajahmundry, India. pp.25
Tinospora cardifolia. Insect Environ 19:168170
542 V. Sridhar et al.

Selvaraju NG, Sakthivel N (2011) Host plants of papaya bug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera:
mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Pseudococcidoae). J Environ Biol 34:153158
Granara de Willink.) in Tamil Nadu. Karnataka J Agric Vijay S, Suresh S (2013a) Coccid pests of ower and
Sci 24(4):567569 medicinal crops in Tamil Nadu. Karnataka J Agric Sci
Singh MP, Ghosh SN (1970) Studies on Maconellicoccus 26:4653
hirsutus causing bunchy top in mesta. Indian J Sci Vijay S, Suresh S (2013b) Host plants of Phenacoccus
Ind 4:99105 spp. complex in Tamil Nadu. Karnataka J Agric Sci
Tanwar RK, Jeyakumar P, Vennila S (2010) Papaya 26:147151
mealybug and its management strategies, Technical Williams DJ (1986) The identity and distribution of
bulletin 22. National Centre for Integrated Pest Maconellicoccus Ezat (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)
Management, New Delhi, 22 p in Africa. Bull Entomol Res 76:621624
Varshney RK (1992) A check list of the scale insects and Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of south Asia. The Natural
mealybugs of South Asia. Part- 1. Rec Zool Surv India History Museum/Southdene SDN, BHD, London/
Occ Paper 139:1152 Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Vennila S, Prasad YG, Prabhakar M, Agarwal M, Sreedevi
G, Bambawale OM (2013) Weed hosts of cotton mealy
Plantation Crops
58
Chandrika Mohan, P. Rajan,
and A. Josephrajkumar

The plantation crops viz., coconut, arecanut, Palmicultor palmarum, Phenacoccus sakai,
cocoa and tea are traditionally grown in India. Planococcoides anaboranae, Pseudococcus por-
The products and by-products of these crops tiludovici, Tylococcus malaccensis, Crinitococcus
form vital inputs for several industries and sus- palmae and Cyperia angolica are almost
tain livelihood for many million farm families. restricted to palms.
Infestation by insects form a crucial limiting
factor in attaining the production potential of
plantation crops. Among the sucking pest complex, 58.1 Coconut
mealy bugs, being polyphagous constitute a key
biotic stress that reduce plantation crop yield sig- In coconut, nine important species of mealybugs
nicantly. Fifty-seven species of Pseudococcids are reported from India viz. Palmicultor pal-
have been recorded on palms (Table 58.1). Half marum Ehron. Dysmicoccus cocotis Maskell,
of the Palmivorous species belong to the genera Pseudococcus longispinus Targ. Pseudococcus
Dysmicoccus, Planococcus, Pseudococcus and cryptus, Planococcus lilacinus, Pseudococcus
Rhizoecus. Among the wide array of mealy bug microadonidam, Nipaecoccus nipae Maskell,
species, Dysmicoccus has the most palmivorous Dysmicoccus nitimus and Rhizoecus sp. In
species (eight) including three species known Guam, Coccidohstrix insolita was observed
only from palms. The most commonly reported infesting coconut palm (Aubrey Moore et al. 2014).
mealy bug pest of palms are highly polyphagous Ferrisia virgata is also known to infest coconut
species, distributed worldwide and are primarily ( http://www.plantwise.org/KnowledgeBank/
known as pests of crops other than palms. Datasheet.aspx?dsid=23981).
Classical examples include Dysmicoccus brevi-
pes, Nipaecoccus nipae and Pseudococcus
longispinus. Few mealybug species namely 58.1.1 Palmicultor palmarum
Dysmicoccus hambletoni, Dysmicoccus cocotis,
Dysmicoccus nitimus, Neosimmondsia hirsuta, Palmicultor palmarum infests young seedlings
especially when they are closely spaced or in
nurseries and greenhouses. It does little damage
C. Mohan (*) P. Rajan A. Josephrajkumar to mature coconut palms but sometimes kills
ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, seedlings. It has been observed in dense aggrega-
Kayamkulam, 690 533 Alappuzha district, tions on leaf axils especially on spindle/spear
Kerala, India leaves and at the base of spear leaves. Red ants
e-mail: cmcpcri@gmail.com

Springer India 2016 543


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_58
544 C. Mohan et al.

Table 58.1 Mealybugs recorded on Palms [Ben-Dov (1994), Howard et al. (2001)]
Mealy bug species Palm hosts Distribution
Chryseococcus arecae (Maskell) Rhopalostylis sapida Australia, New Zealand
Crisicoccus hirsutus (Newstead) Areca catechu India
Coccidohystrix insolita Green) Cocus nucifera Eastern Hemisphere, Guam
Crinitococcus palmae Ben-Dov Caryota sp. Philippines
Dysmicoccus boninsis (Kuwana) C. nucifera Pantropical
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) Areca catechu, Carpentaria acuminata, Cosmopolitan (India, Indonesia,
C. nucifera, E. guineensis, Malaysia, Maldives, Philippines,
Pheonix dactylifera, Rhapis, Sri Lanka)
Roystonea & Sabal bermudiana
Dysmicoccus cocotis (Mask ell) C. nucifera Oceania, India
Dysmicoccus nitimus Williams C. nucifera Southern Asia, Malaysia
Dysmicoccus furcillosus sp.n. Areca catechu India
Dysmicoccus neobrevipes (Beardsley) C. nucifera Tropical America, Oceania,
Philippines
Dysmicoccus nesophilus Williams & Balaka seemanni Oceania
Watson
Dysmicoccus papuanicus Williams & C. nucifera New Guinea
Watson
Ferrisia consobrina Williams & Watson Metaxylon sagu Pantropical
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) C. nucifera & P. dactylifera Cosmopolitan
Formicoccus polysperes sp.n. Areca catechu India
Geococcus coffeae Green Chamaedorea Cosmopolitan
Laingiococcus painei (Laing) C. nucifera Oceania
Laminicoccus andersi Williams Gronophyllum & Howea Australia, New Zealand
Laminicoccus vitensis (Green ) C. nucifera & Roystonea regia Oceania
Leptococcus metroxyli Reyne C. nucifera & Metroxylon New Guinea
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) P. dactylifera & P. sylvestris Cosmopolitan
Maculicoccus malaitensis (Cockrell) C. nucifera Oceania
Neosimmondsia esakii Takahashi Metroxylon amicarum & Ptychosperma Caroline Islands
ledermanniana
Neosimmondsia hirsuta Laing C. nucifera Solomon Islands
Nipaecoccus agathidis Williams C. nucifera Guadeloupe
Nipaecoccus nipae (Maskell) Areca sp. Arenga saccharifera, Cosmopolitan
Calyptrogyne, Chamaedorea,
Chamaerops excelsus, C. nucifera,
Gronophyllum, Howea belmoreana,
Howea forsteriana, Livistona chinensis,
Nypa fruticans, Pritchardia,
Ptychosperma, Rhapis humilis,
Sabal & Syagrus romanzofana
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) C. nucifera India
Palmicultor palmarum (Beardsley) A. catechu, C. nucifera, Dypsis Oceania, Asia, tropical America,
lutescens, Latania glaucaphylla, Florida, Bermuda, Bangladesh,
R. regia & Veitchia sp. India, Malaysia, Maldives,
Philippines, Vietnam
Paraputo kukumi Williams C. nucifera Solomon Islands
(continued)
58 Plantation Crops 545

Table 58.1 (continued)


Mealy bug species Palm hosts Distribution
Paraputo leveri (Green) C. nucifera Oceania, Papua New Guinea
Phenacoccus gregosus Williams & Chamaedorea Mexico, Central America
Granara de Willink
Palmicultor guamensis (Beardsley) A.catechu, C. nucifera Neotropical & Pacic region
Phenacoccus sakai (Takahashi) N. fruticans Malaysia
Planococcoides anaboranae (Mamet) C. nucifera Madagascar
Planococcus citri (Risso) C. nucifera, Gronophyllum sp., Cosmopolitan
P. dactylifera
Planococcus cus (Signoret) P. dactylifera Cosmopolitan
Planococcus kraunhiae (Kuwana) Trachycarpus fortunei Asia, California
Planococcus lilacinus (Cockerell) C. nucifera & P. dactylifera Cosmopolitan
Planococcus minor (Maskell) A. catechu, B. seemannii, & C. nucifera Cosmopolitan
Planococcus nigritulus De Lotto P. dactylifera Tanzania
Plotococcus neotropicus Williams & C. nucifera Tropical America
Granara de Willink
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel C. nucifera, Areca catechu & Cosmopolitan
E. guineensis
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni A. catechu, Chamaedorea elatior, Cosmopolitan
Tozzetti) D. lutescens, C. nucifera, Dictyosperma
album, Howea sp., Metroxylon sagu,
Roystonea sp. & Phoenix canariensis
Pseudococcus microadonidum Beardsley C. nucifera Oceania, Seychelles
Pseudococcus portiludovici Mamet C. nucifera & Latania verschaffeltii Indian Ocean, Mauritius, Chagos
Archipelago
Pseudococcus zamiae (Lucas) Howea sp. Australia
Rastrococcus iceryoides Green A. catechu Eastern Hemisphere, India
Rastrococcus neoguineensi Williams & C. nucifera Indonesia, New Guinea
Watson
Rastrococcus spinosus (Robinson) C. nucifera South-East Asia
Rhizoecus americanus Ferris Areca sp., Chamaedorea elegans, Tropical America, Italy
D. lutescens, Coccothrinax argentata,
Chamaedorea, Howea sp.,
Phoenix loureiri
Rhizoecus californicus Ferris Rhopalostylis sapida New Zealand, California
Rhizoecus cocois Ben-Dov C. nucifera India
Rhizoecus falcifer Kiinckel dHerculais Chaaerops humilis, Howea belmoreana, Cosmopolitan
Howea forsteriana, P. canariensis,
Phoenix roebelenii, Ptychosperma sp.,
Ptychosperma elegans, Sabal
blackburniana
Rhizoecus oridanus D. lutescens, P. canariensis, South-eastern USA
S. romanzofana
Rhizoecus hibisci Kawai & Takagi P. canariensis, Sabal sp. Japan, Puerto Rico
Tylococcus malaccensis Takahashi N. fruticans Malaysia
Xenococcus annandalei Silvestri C. nucifera Australia, New Guinea,
South-East Asia, Malaysia, India
546 C. Mohan et al.

are mostly associated with this mealybug colony. 3789 offspring (Jalaluddin and Mohanasundaram
It was introduced into Florida where it has been 1993). Sometimes the red ant, Oecophylla sma-
observed in leaf axils and at the base of the spear ragdina (Fab.) was found associated with the
leaf of R. regia, Veitchia spp. and D. lutescens. In mealybugs.
severe cases, spear leaves become necrotic and
the palm dies. P. palmarum was found mainly on
coconut in Micronesia, Hawaii and Bahamas 58.1.2 Psuedococcus longispinus
(Williams 1981). P. palmarum has also been
recorded in Bangladesh on leaves of coconut and Pseudococcus longispinus affects spindle leaves,
palmyra palm (Borassus abellifer) (Ali 1987). and severe infestation results in failure of heart
In India, Palmicultor sp. took 21.60 days to com- leaf development and nally ends up with drying
plete its lifecycle. Adult females and males lived up of spindle. Seedlings are highly prone to
for 18.27 and 2.8 days, resp. A female produced attack.

Psudococcus cocotis Palmicultor palmarum (Ehrhorn)

58.1.3 Dysmicoccus spp. developed, resulting in the reduction of the


effective photosynthetic area of the leaets
They are known to infest leaves of coconut seed- (Razak and Jayaraj 2002). In Vellayani, Kerala,
lings. D. cocotis is known to occur west of India, Dysmicoccus brevipes was reported from
Micronesia in the north and Fiji in the south. the perianth of immature nuts in coconut
D. nitimus is found colonizing the spadix of (Radhakrishnan et al. 2003).
coconut to southern India, Sri Lanka, Cocos
Islands and peninsular Malaysia (Williams
1994). Infesttion by D. nitimus was also 58.1.4 Rhizoecus sp.
recorded from the spathe of coconut palms from
Kerala (CPCRI 2012). Dysmicoccus carens was A species of the genus Rhizoecus infesting
observed on coconuts at Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, roots of coconut was reported for the rst time
India on the undersurface of the leaets, from Trivandrum, Kerala (Nair et al. 1980). It
desapping the plant heavily causing severe infests roots of coconut palms in sandy areas.
yellowing. D. carens excreted honeydew on Infested seedlings turn yellowish and loose
which the sooty mould (Capnodium sp.) vigour.
58 Plantation Crops 547

58.1.5 Pseudococcus microadonidam feeding on the roots of coconut palm. It was


and Planococcus lilacinus recoded on coconut in Philippines (Lit et al.
2006). The occurrence of N. nipae was reported
Pseudococcus microadonidam was found caus- from Bengal, East India (Green 1908).
ing damage to coconut in Seychelles (Williams Re-emergence of the pest was reported in India
1981). Planococcus lilacinus (Ckll.) was reported after a time gap of 100 years. It was recorded on
from Guyana (Williams 1981). P. microadoni- tender feeder roots of coconut seedling at
dam and P. lilacinus are known to infest coconut Kayamkulam, Kerala, India. N. nipae was not
in India (Mohandas and Remamony 1993). located on any other arboreal parts of palm
(Josephrajkumar et al. 2012). Adult females and
immatures feed on the sap of the host plant. Ants
58.1.6 Nipaecoccus nipae are often found feeding on mealybug honeydew
secretions and may also defend the mealybugs
Nipaecoccus nipae was reported on coconut in from predators or parasitoids (Ben-Dov 1994;
Demerara, Guyana (Maskell 1893). In Florida, Williams and Granara de Willink 1992).
Howard et al. (2001) gave an account of N. nipae

Mealybug damage Nipaecoccus nipae


to coconut

Infestation of Nipaecoccus nipae on a palm species


(Photocredit: Lyle J. Buss)

58.1.7 Pseudococcus cryptus Infested colonies were foraged by ants. P. cryptus


and Formicococcus cocotis was reported from Colachel, Tamil Nadu, India
(CPCRI 2012). Formicococcus cocotis sp. nov.
The leaf mealybug, Pseudococcus cryptus, was was reported on coconut from Zanzibar (Williams
found colonizing at moderate level on the leaves. and Matile-Ferrero 2005).
548 C. Mohan et al.

58.1.8 Management the pest insects. The most important natural ene-
mies on coconut mealybugs are Pullus sp.,
Chemical Control Management of mealybugs Scymnus sp. (Coccinellidae), Spalgis epeus
begins with detection and identication of the (Lycaenidae), Bergineus maindroni
pest. Regular monitoring will allow detection of (Mycetophazidae), Dicrodiplosis sp.
these pests before damage is obvious and will (Cecidomyiidae), Homalotylus oculatus
also allow improved control. All plant parts need (Encyrtidae). These natural enemies exert good
to be searched, including the undersides of leaves control of the pest in nature. In case of severe
and stems. Pruning or washing infested plant infestation only, insecticides are to be applied. C.
parts can be helpful in reducing populations, par- montrouzieri was imported from California for
ticularly in cases of small infestations. A brisk the control of coconut mealybug Nipaecoccus
wash spray of water can also be helpful in reduc- nipae in Bermuda. The numbers released were
ing the population. Systemic insecticides can not probably adequate to provide reasonable
provide excellent options for mealybug control. opportunity for establishment (Bennett and
Soil application of thiodemeton [disulfoton] at Hughes 1959). In Seychelles, C. montrouzieri
0.5 g/plant and spraying with methyl demeton was introduced in 1959 and 1961 for the control
0.05 % were both highly effective against a of Pseudococcus (=Planococcus) longispinus but
severe attack of P. longispinus on 6-month-old not recovered (Bartlett 1977). The use of
coconut seedlings in India (Murthy and Pseudaphycus utilis Timberlake, a parasitic
Giridharan 1976). Application of 0.1 % mala- wasp, as a biological control agent successfully
thion, 0.025 % methomyl, 0.025 % demeton-O- controlled coconut mealybug Nipaecoccus nipae
methyl, 0.03 % dimethoate and 0.05 % in Hawaii and Puerto Rico (http://entnemdept.u.
phosphamidon caused 100 % mortality within 7 edu/creatures/orn/mealybug/coconut mealybug.
days, and 0. 05 % parathion-methyl caused 70 % htm).
mortality of Palmicultor sp. on coconut leaves
(Jalaluddin et al. 1991). Regular monitoring and
spot application twice with dimethoate 0.05 % at 58.2 Arecanut
20 days interval during summer to avoid further
spread of mealy bugs from infested coconut and Pseudococcus cryptus, Dysmicoccus brevipes
cocoa plantations (Nair 1983). and Dysmicoccus sp. are the mealybug species
found feeding on developing fruit bunches, spa-
dices, outer surface of leaf sheath, inorescence,
spindle leaves and occasionally on leaves. Severe
58.1.9 Biological Control infestation during tender nut stage causes imma-
ture nut fall.
Mealybugs are commonly attacked by predators,
parasitoids and diseases which can help manage
populations, particularly for long-term control. It 58.2.1 Pseudococcus cryptus
is important to recognize the presence of bene-
cial insects and to take steps to conserve them in It was found to infest leaves, inorescence and
the environment so they are available to control developing fruit bunches (Daniel 2003).
58 Plantation Crops 549

Pseudococcus cryptus Paracoccus marginatus

58.2.2 Dysmicoccus spp. Rao and Bavappa (1961) reported D. brevipes on


areca nut infesting the lamina and collar regions
Dysmicoccus brevipes and Dysmicoccus sp. were of the seedling causing yellowish patches. Ants
reported on arecanut. They were found coloniz- associated with D. brevipes protect them by mud
ing mainly the spindle leaf of the arecanut palm nests (Daniel 2003).
and the inner basal portion of the inorescence.

Colony of Dysmicoccus Dysmicoccus damage to arecanut


550 C. Mohan et al.

58.2.3 Management India (Nair 1981; Daniel 1994; TNAU 2015).


Pest attack is more in July to October. It colo-
Basavaraju et al. (2013) reported that neem oil nizes on the tender parts of the plant such as
at 3 % signicantly reduced the population of D. growing tips of the shoots, the terminal buds, the
brevipes (1.07 no./nut) which is at par with pon- ower cushions, the young cherelles and mature
gamia oil at 3 % (1.13 no./nut) when compared pods. Planococcoides njalensis (Laing) occurs
to untreated check (4.53 no./nut). Natural enemies throughout West Africa, and is the most impor-
of arecanut mealybug D. brevipes include mag- tant mealy bug on cocoa being the vector of
gots of cecidomyiid, Tryphlodromus sp., cocci- cocoa swollen shoot caused by badnavirus,
nellid predators and ichneumonid parasitoid, resulting in heavy crop loss (Padi 1997; Roivainen
Oricoruna arcotensis (Mani and Kurian), which 1976; Campbell 1983; Owusu and Bonney 1984).
keep the pest under check in nature (Daniel Planococcus citri (Risso), Planococcoides
2003). njalensis (Laing) and Phenacoccus hargreavesi
(Laing) are the most common mealybugs on
cacao at Tafo, Ghana (Campbell 1974). At Tafo,
58.3 Cocoa Ghana, Planococcoides njalensis (Laing) and
Planococcus citri (Risso) are the main vector
Planococcus lilacinus, Planococcus citri, species of cocoa swollen shoot disease
Rastrococcus iceryoides and Paracoccus (Bigger 1977) (Table 58.2).
marginatus were reported infesting cocoa from

Table 58.2 List of mealybugs recorded on cocoa in different countries


Mealybug species Region/country References
Crinticoccus tectus Williams Solomon islands Ben-Dov (1994)
Crinticoccus theobromae Williams Solomon islands Ben-Dov (1994)
Crisicoccus theobromae Williams &Watson Papua New Guinea Ben-Dov (1994)
Deltococcus tafaensis (Strickland) Ghana Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockrell) Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus debregeasiae (Green) Malaysia Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus grassii (Leonardi) Malaysia Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus lepelleyi (Betrem) Malaysia Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus neobreipes Beardsley Ben-Dov (1994)
Exallomochlus camur sp.n. Malaysia Williams (2004)
Exallomochlus hispidus (Morrison) Malaysia & Singapore Williams (2004)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) India Ben-Dov (1994), Williams (2004)
Malaysia Williams (2004)
Geococcus coffeae Green Ben-Dov (1994)
Hordeolicoccus nephalii (Takahashi) Malaysia Williams (2004)
Laingiococcus painei (Laing) Papua New Guinea Ben-Dov (1994)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
India Anand and Ayub Khan (2006)
Maconellicoccus multipori (Takahashi) Malaysia Williams (2004)
Mutabilicoccus vanheurni (Reyne) Papua New Guinea Ben-Dov (1994)
Neochavesia trinidadiensis (Beardsley) Trinidad Ben-Dov (1994)
Nipaecoccus guazumae (Balachowsky) Columbia Ben-Dov (1994)
(continued)
58 Plantation Crops 551

Table 58.2 (continued)


Mealybug species Region/country References
Nipaecoccus kuduyaricus Williams & Columbia Ben-Dov (1994)
Granara de Willink
Nipaecoccus neogaeus Williams & Columbia Ben-Dov (1994)
Granara de Willink
Nipaecoccus nipae (Makell) Hawaii Ben-Dov (1994)
Nipaecoccus pikini Williams & Trinidad Ben-Dov (1994)
Granara de Willink
Phenacoccus hargreavesi (Laing) Ethiopian region Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
Planococcus kenyae (Le Pelley) Ethiopian Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus lilacinus (Cockrell) India, Malaysia, Williams (2004)
Philippines, Sri Lanka
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Malaysia, Philippines, Ben-Dov (1994), Williams (2004)
Singapore, Thailand
Trinidad Francis et al. (2012)
Planococcus principe Cox Principe island Williams (2004)
Planococcoides lmbokensis Central Africa Ben-Dov (1994)
(Balachowsky & Ferrero)
Planococcoides njalensis (Laing) Africa Ben-Dov (1994)
Plotococcus neotropicus Williams de Granara Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
Promyrmococcus wayi Williams Malaysia Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus calceolarieae (Maskell) Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus jackbeardsley Gimpel and Miller Malaysia Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus landoi (Balachowsky) Neotropical Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Tozzetti) Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudorhizoecus proximus Green Columbia Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus solomonensis Williams Solomon islands Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus theobromae (Douglas) England Ben-Dov (1994)
Rastrococcus iceryoides (Green) Malaysia Williams (2004)
Rhizoecus falcifer Kunckel d Herculais Ben-Dov (1994)
Rhizoecus globoculus (Hambleton) Trinidad Ben-Dov (1994)
Rhizoecus ornatus (Hambleton) Trinidad Ben-Dov (1994)
Rhizoecus spelaea (Strickland) Ghana Ben-Dov (1994)
Rhizoecus theobromae Hambleton Ecuador Ben-Dov (1994)

58.3.1 Planococcus lilacinus terminal buds, the ower cushions, the young
cherelles and the mature pods. Mealybugs feed-
The cocoa mealybug P. lilacinus (Ckll.) occurs in ing on the tender apical shoots result in reduced
most of the cocoa growing tracts of South East growth causing deformity of the shoots which
Asia viz., India, Sri Lanka and Papua New grow as brush-like structures. Infestation of the
Guinea. In India, it is reported as a serious pest ower cushion results in cushion abortion and
causing damage to cocoa and is present in all continuous attack results in withering and drying
cocoa tracts of the country. It is present through- of the ower cushions. The feeding on the bark of
out the year colonizing the tender parts of the pods by mealybugs results in irregular cracks and
plants such as the growing tips of the shoots, the pitting and feeding on cherelles result in cherelle
552 C. Mohan et al.

wilt. Peak population is reported in April-May example of NA34 and T63/967. Trees of T17/524
and low level of activity is recorded during rainy parentage were sparsely infested with mealybugs
and post monsoon seasons (Nair 1981). (Campbell 1990).

58.3.3 Planococcus minor

It was widely distributed throughout Trinidad but


at low level. Twelve species of predators includ-
ing Diodiplosis coccidivorum and two parasit-
oids, Leptomastix dactylopii and Coccidoxynoides
perminutus, were able to keep the mealybug to
minor status in all the locations in Trinidad
(Francis et al. 2012).
Planococcus lilacinus

58.3.4 Ant Association

58.3.2 Planococcus citri Ants are always found attending mealybug


colonies. Some construct tents over mealy bug
Ayyar (1940) rst reported P. citri (Risso) on colonies while some others make covered nest
cocoa in Nilgiris and later in Kerala (Abraham over colonies with mud particles. Though about
and Padmanbhan 1967). This species infests seven species of ants are found associated with
shoot tips, ower stalks, foliage, stem tissues, mealy bug colonies of cocoa in India, the Asian
cherelles and pods. Severe infestation of weaver ant, Oecophylla smaragdina (Fab.) and
cherelles results in drying up. Infestation on Technomyrmex sp. are seen attending the mealy
mature pods results in irregular sunken necrotic bug colonies infesting cocoa in Southern
lesions. Population peak occurs in July-October Karnataka. Colonies of Technomyrmex are more
(Abraham and Remamony 1979). P. citri has also prevalent on mealy bug colonies of ower cush-
been reported on cocoa in Sri Lanka (Williams ions. The black ant Dolichoderus bituberculatus
2004). In Ghana, regression lines of log numbers also attend to P. lilacinus (Daniel 2002). In West
per tree of P. citri against canopy size of the two Africa, Crematogasterine ants attending the colo-
progenies were parallel, indicating that for a given nies of P. njalensis (Bigger (1981) indicate that
canopy size P. citri was 2.3 times more prevalent incidence of West African mealybug is strongly
in trees of Series IIB (E1:C43/291XT63/967) inuenced by the nature of ant fauna and the
than in T85/799XT17/359. A similar analysis presence of planted shade trees that provide
with the combined numbers per tree of seven nesting sites to the associated species of
mealybug species showed that they were 1.9 Crematogaster.
times more prevalent in Series IIB than in Neochavesia caldasiae (Pseudococcidae,
T85/799XT17/359 trees of the same size (Bigger Rhizoecinae) and its host ant Acropyga fuhrmanni
1975). Resistance studies on Planococcoides live in symbiosis on the cocoa tree roots at Bahia,
njalensis (Laing) and P. citri (Risso) in cocoa Brazil. The mealybug antennae are used as a
indicated that progenies 85D/176A X M7/537 communication organ between the two organ-
and T12/116 X T62/977 were judged the most isms, aiming to recruit the ant to be sheltered or
resistant (Firempong 1984). In Ghana, crosses carried to another gallery of the nest. It is
with Amelonado or T63/971 were generally more described as the appeasement boxing: the
densely infested with mealybugs than those for mealybug boxes the ant with its abdominal apex
58 Plantation Crops 553

when it is hustled by the ant, aiming this one far the population of mealy bugs in cocoa plantations
from its safe place on the root (Delabie et al (Daniel 2002). In India, the predators observed
2008). with mealy bugs infesting cocoa are coccinellid
beetles, Scymnus sp., the lycaenid Spalgis epeus
Westwood. Trials with introduced predatory bee-
58.3.5 Management tles Cryptolaemus montrousieri did not give pos-
itive results (CPCRI 1986) probably due to
The control of mealy bug by insecticide is usu- activity of the associating attendant ant, mainly
ally difcult because of its habits, water repellent Oecophylla smargdina, in cocoa ecosystem.
nature of their body covering and the protection Ackonor and Mordjifa (1999) have listed the nat-
provided by the ant-constructed nests. Hence ural enemies of Planococcoides njalensis in
destruction of initial foci of infestation before Ghana. Natural enemies include two species of
attaining severe proportion is very important. coccinellid predators Hyperaspis sgregia Mader
Destruction of highly infested plant parts and and Scymnus sp., the cecidomyiid Coccodiplosis
removal of alternate weed hosts in the immediate coffeae Barnes and six hymenopteran parasitoids
vicinity aid in reducing the mealybug population. including Aenasius abengouroui (Risbec).
Locate ant colonies during summer ploughing Cecidomyiids predating on both species of
and destroy. Conservation of coccinellid lady Planococcus infesting cocoa was reported in
beetles in the ecosystem. Proper pruning of cocoa Southern Karnataka (Daniel 2002). Exotic para-
branches helps some way in preventing colony sitoid Acerophagous papayae was released to
build up of O. smaragdina (Daniel 2002). Nair control Paracoccus marginatus infesting cocoa
(1981) indicated that foliar spraying of 0.05 % inter-cropped in coconut garden at Kondikulam
fenthion, quinalphos or dimethoate was effective and Alivalam villages of Pattukottai taluk in
against P. lilacinus. This could even be applied as Thanjavur district in Tamil Nadu, India (http://
spot spray whenever the mealy bug population www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-
was over 15 % for maintianing the population at tamilnadu/parasitoids-to-control-mealy-bug- -
a lower level. infesting-cocoa-released/article1157926.ece). In
When the infestation is lesser, Spraying of the area where P. marginatus alone occurs, eld
neem oil 3 % or sh oil rosin soap 25 g/litre was release of Acerophagus papayae, the encyrtid
recommended. In case of severe incidence, parasitoid @ 100 per hamlet is recommended as
spraying of any one of the following chemicals the best management strategy (Jayaraj and
is recommended: Dimethoate (2 ml/litre), Ananthan 2008). After the complete control of
Profenophos (2 ml/litre), Chlorpyriphos (5 ml/ ants, release predatory ladybird beetle particu-
litre), Buprofezin (2 ml/litre), Imidacloprid (0.6 larly C. montrouzieri is to be considered to check
ml/litre), Thiamethoxam (0.6 g/litre). The insec- the mealybugs on cocoa in general.
ticide must be applied only after collecting the
pods which are ready for harvesting (Jayaraj and
Ananthan 2008). The possibility of exploiting the 58.4 Tea
use of natural enemies, semiochemicals, tolerant
or cocoa varieties unattractive to pseudococcids, The predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri was
and the sterile male technique for effective vector released against the mealybugs on tea
control are to be considered (Padi 1997). (Dzhiviladze 1979). Cryptolaemus montrouzieri
was found colonizing on sucking insects in tea
gardens in China (Xuan Dai 1996). A new genus
58.3.6 Biological Control and species Assamencyrtus jorhatensis Singh
from Assam, India, is described. This species is
Indigenous natural enemies, though present in all recorded as a primary parasitoid of coconut-
situations, are not in sufcient numbers to lower mealy-bug, which has been observed as a serious
554 C. Mohan et al.

Table 58.3 List of mealybugs recorded on tea the tea gardens monitored, four generations per
Mealybug species Region/country References year are indicated by peaks in crawler density.
Crisicoccus India Williams (2004) Changes in the tea mealybug within tea tree dis-
matsumotoi tribution showed greater seasonal variation than
(Siraiwa) its density. The most notable aspect of the within-
Dysmicoccus India Williams (2004)
tree distribution is that some tea mealybugs were
impararlis sp.n.
found on the roots on all sample dates. The pro-
Lankacoccus Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
ornatus (Green) portion was smallest during the June-July period,
Nipaecoccus India Williams (2004) when the mealybug density was peaking (during
viridis (Newstead) Sri Lanka Williams (1999) the spring ush of growth and the harvest period).
Planococcus Ben-Dov (1994) As tea mealybug population entered the warmest
minor (Maskell) summer months the proportion of the population
Paraputo India Williams (2004) found under ground and on the lower portion of
theaecola (Green) the tea trunk increased. The tea mealybug was
Pseudococcus Sri Lanka Williams (2004) seeking protection (probably from heat) under-
theae (Rutherford)
ground (Abbasipour and Taghavi 2007).
Pseudococcus Iran Abbasipour and
viburni (Signoret) Taghavi (2007)
Rasrococcus India Ben-Dov (1994),
iceryoides (Green) Williams (2004) References
Rhizoecus theae Japan Ben-Dov (1994)
Kawai & Takai Abbasipour H, Taghavi A (2007) Description and sea-
sonal abundance of the tea mealybug, Pseudococcus
viburni (afnis) (Signoret) found on tea in Iran.
J Entomol 4(6):474478
Abraham EV, Padmanbhan MD (1967) Pests that damage
pest of young coconut nuts in Assam (Singh cocoa in Madras. Indian Hortic 11:1112
Abraham CC, Remamony KS (1979) Pests that damage
2006). Rhizoecus theae sp.n. was found infesting
cocoa plants in Kerala. Indian Cocoa Arecanut Spices
on the roots of tea in Japan (Kawai and Takagi J 2:7781
1971). In tea gardens of north of Iran, obscure Ackonor JB, Mordjifa DK (1999) Parasitism and preda-
mealybug Pseudococcus viburni (Ps. afnis) tion in Planococcoides njalensis (Laing) (Homoptera:
Pseudococcoidae) on Cocoa in Ghana. Trop Agric
(Signoret) was recorded as dominant species
76:269274
from tea gardens. Tea mealybug density increased Ali M (1987) Palm mealybug, Palmicultor palmarum
rapidly to an early peak in April, followed by a (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), new to the Indian sub-
decline and then a low, but steady density for continent. Ann Entomol Soc Am 80(4):501
Anand B, Ayub Khan P (2006) Attractivenessof hibiscus
remainder of the season until there was another
mealybug to different plant species. Insect Environ
decline in November. Across the tea gardens 11(4):175176
monitored, four generations per year are indi- Aubrey Moore, Gillian W, Watson, Jesse Bamba (2014)
cated by peaks in crawler density (Abbasipour First record of Eggplant Mealybug,
Coccidohystrixinsolita (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae),
and Taghavi 2007). Nipaecoccus viridis
on Guam: potentially a major pest First record of Egg
(Newstead) was found mainly on the axils of plant Mealybug, Coccidohystrixinsolita (Hemiptera:
leaves and the growth of the affected shoots in Pseudococcidae), on Guam: potentially a major pest.
Assam (Das and Ganguli 1961). Two mealybugs, Data J 2:e1042 (23Jan2014)7/ BDJ.2.e1042 (le:///H:
/First%20record %20of%20 Eggpla.htm)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Pseudococcus viburni
Ayyar TVR (1940) Hand book of economic entomology
(Obscure mealybug), have been recorded in tea for South India. Government Press, Madras, 548p
gardens of north of Iran (Table 58.3). Tea mealy- Basavaraju SL, Revanappa SB, Prashant K, Rajkumar
bug density increased rapidly to an early peak in AK, Sowmya HC, Gajanan KD, Srinivas N (2013)
Bioecology and management of arecanut scale,
April, followed by a decline and then a low, but
Parasaissetia nigra (Neitner) and mealybug,
steady density for remainder of the season until Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell). Indian J Agric Res
there was another decline in November. Across 47(5):436440
58 Plantation Crops 555

Bartlett BR (1977) Pseudococcidae In introduced Firempong S (1984) Laboratory and eld evaluation of
parasites and predators of arthropod pests and weeds cocoa progenies for resistance to mealybug vectors
A world Review (C.P. Clausen ed.) U.S. Dept. Agri. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) of swollen shoot virus.
Hand Book No. 490, pp 137169 Bull Entomol Res 74(1):97102
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- Francis MA, Kairo WTK, Roda AL, Oscar E, Liburd OE,
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Polar P (2012) The passionvine mealybug, Planococcus
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- minor (Maskell) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), and its
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic natural enemies in the cocoa agroecosystem in
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686p Trinidad. Biol Control 60:290296
Bennett FD, Hughes IW (1959) Biolgoical control of Green EE (1908) Remarks on Indian scale insects
insect pests of Bermuda. Bull Entomol Res (Coccidae), Part 3. With a catalogue of all species hith-
50:423436 erto recorded from the Indian continent. Memoirs of
Bigger M (1975) Susceptibility of two cocoa progenies to the department of agriculture in India. Entomol Ser
attack by insect species. II- Effects of canopy size on 2:1546
numbers of mealybugs. Exp Agric 11(3):193199 Howard FW, Moore D, Giblin-Davis RM, Abad RG (2001)
Bigger M (1977) Recent work on the mealybug vectors on Insects on palms. CAB International, Wallingford
cocoa swollen shoot virus. In: Proceedings of the 4th Jalaluddin M, Mohanasundaram (1993) Biological stud-
conference of West African cocoa entomologists, ies of the coconut mealybug Palmicultor sp. Indian
Zoology Department, University of Ghana, Legon, Coconut J (Cochin) 23(11):911
Ghana, 9th13th December 1974, pp 6266 Jalaluddin SM, Mohanasundaram M, Sundarababu PC
Bigger M (1981) Observations on the insect fauna of (1991) Toxicity of insecticides to the coconut mealy-
shaded and unshaded Amelonado Cocoa. Bull bug Palmicultor sp. Indian Coconut J (Cochin)
Entomol Res 71:107119 22(4):1516
Campbell CAM (1974) The distribution of mealybug vec- Jayaraj J, Ananthan M (2008) Controlling cocoa mealy
tors of CSSV within trees. In: Proceedings of the 4th bug. The Hindu, Thurasday, October 16, 2008.
conference of West African Cocoa Entomologists, Available at http://www.hindu.com/seta/ 2008/10/16/
Zoology Department, University of Ghana, Legon, stories/2008101650871600.htm
Ghana, 9th13th December 1974, pp 6771 Josephrajkumar A, Rajan P, Mohan C, Thomas RJ (2012)
Campbell CAM (1983) The assessment of mealybugs New distributional record of buff coconut mealybug
(Pseudococcidae) and other Homoptera on mature cocoa (Nipaecoccus nipae) in Kerala, India. Phytoparasitica
trees in Ghana. Bull Entomol Res 73(1):137151 40:533535. doi:10.1007/s12600-012-0260-2
Campbell CAM (1990) The susceptibility of cocoa to Kawai S, Takagi K (1971) Descriptions of three economi-
mealybugs (Pseudococcidae) and other honeydew- cally important species of root-feeding mealybugs in
producing Homoptera in Ghana. Bull Entomol Res Japan (Homoptera:Pseudococcidae). Appl Entomol
80(2):137151 Zool 6(4):175182
CPCRI (1986) Annual Report for 1985. ICAR-Central Lit IL, Lit MTC, Larona AR (2006) Buff coconut mealy-
Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, 212p bug, Nipaecoccus nipae (Maskell), a new invasive pest
CPCRI (2012) Two new species of mealy bugs identied. in the Philippines with a synopsis of other scale insects
CPCRI News 31(2):2 found in coconut. Philipp Agric Sci 89:719
Daniel M (1994) Pests of cocoa. In: Chadda KL, Rethinam Maskell WM (1893) Further coccid notes, with descrip-
P (eds) Plantation and spices crops part 2, Advances in tions of new species from Australia, India, Sandwich
horticulture, vol 10. Malhotra Publishing House, New Islands, Demerara and South Pacic. Trans Proc NZ
Delhi, pp 743758 Inst 25:230252
Daniel M (2002) Pests In: Cocoa (Ed. D. Balasimha) Mohandas N, Remamony KS (1993) Emerging pest prob-
ICAR-CPCRI, Kasaragod, India, pp 108130. lems in coconut and their control. In: Nair MK, Khan
Daniel M (2003) Final report NATP Project on HH, Gopalasundaram P, Bhaskara Rao EVV (eds)
Development of IPM package for plantation crops. Advances in coconut research and development (eds).
CPCRI, Kasaragod, 184p Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.,
Das GM, Ganguli RN (1961) Coccoids on tea in North pp 493503
East India. Indian J Entomol 23(4):245256 Murthy AD, Giridharan S (1976) Control of the coconut
Delabie JHC, Serrao JE, Mariano C Dos SF, Matile- mealybug Pseudococcus longispinus T. Coconut Bull
Ferrero D (2008) Communication behaviors of the 6(12):3
Neotropical mealybug Neochavesia caldasiae Nair CPR (1981) Investigations on insect pests of cocoa
(Balachowsky 1957) (Pseudococcidae: Rhizoecinae) Theobroma cacao L. in Kerala with special reference
with its symbiotic ant Acropyga fuhrmanni (Forel to the mealy bug Planococcus lilacinus (Ckll.)
1914) (Formicidae: Formicinae) [French]. Annales de (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Ph.D. thesis, Kerala
la Societe Entomologique de France 44(4):471475 Agric University, 150 p
Dzhiviladze KN (1979) Use of biological methods in Nair CPR (1983) Effect of some insecticides on the control
Georgia. Zashch. Rast. No. 5, 28 p of cacao mealybug. Proceedings of the second annual
556 C. Mohan et al.

symposium on plantation crops. Plant protection Pseudococcidae). (Focusing on lesser known fauna).
(entomology, microbiology, nematology, plant pathol- Indian Forester 132(12):164172
ogy and rodentology). PLACROSYM II 1979, TNAU (2015) http://agritech.tnau.ac.in/horticulture/
pp 461465 horti_plantation%20crops_cocoa.html. Assessed
Nair MRGK, Visalakshi A, Koshy G (1980) A new root- October 2015. TNAU, Coimbatore
infesting mealybug of coconut. Entomon Williams DJ (1981) New records of some important
5(3):245246 mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Bull
Owusu GK, Bonney JK (1984) Availability of swollen Entomol Res 71(2):243245
shoot virus to mealybugs from virus-sensitive and Williams DJ (1994) Distribution of the Pacic coconut
virus-tolerant young cocoa. Report, Cocoa Research mealybug, Dysmicoccus cocotis (Maskell) and of a
Institute, Ghana, pp 252254 new related species on coconut in southern Asia
Padi B (1997) Prospects for the control of cocoa mealy- (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae). J Nat Hist
bugs. Proceedings rst international cocoa pests and 28(2):365371
diseases seminar, Agric, Ghana, 610 Nov 1995, Williams DJ (1999) The mealybug species Ripersia theae
pp 249263 Rutherford from Sri Lanka and Trionymus kayashimai
Radhakrishnan B, Mathew TB, Premila KS, Mohan P Takahashi from Malaysia (Hem., Pseudococcidae).
(2003) New report of mealybugs occurring inside the Entomol Month Mag 135(16161619):9193
perianth of immature nuts in coconut. Insect Environ Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
9(2):5354 Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
Rao KSN, Bavappa KVA (1961) Nursery diseases and London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
pests of arecanut and their control. Arecanut J 12:136 Williams DJ, Granara de Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs
Razak TA, Jayaraj S (2002) Incidence of spiralling white- of Central and South America. CAB International,
y and leaf mealybug on coconut. Insect Environment London. 635p
8(1):3839 Williams DJ, Matile-Ferrero D (2005) Mealybugs from
Roivainen O (1976) Transmission of cocoa viruses by Zanzibar and Pemba islands with a discussion of a
mealybugs (Homoptera:Pseudococcidae). J Sci Agric potential invasive species (Hemiptera,
Soc Finl 48(3):203304 Pseudococcidae). Rev Fr dEntomol 27(4):145152
Singh S (2006) A new encyrtid genus Assamencyrtus Xuan Dai (1996) Investigation on ladybird beetles
(Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea), from Assam, India, (Coccinellidae) in tea gardens of east Guizhou. J Tea
parasitising coconut mealybugs (Homoptera: Sci 16:131134
Rubber
59
Mani Chellappan

59.1 Species 59.2 Damage

Mealybugs are injurious to rubber (Hevea brasil- Both crawlers and adult female mealybugs feed
iensis) in Sri Lanka, India, Indonesia, Egypt, on the sap of rubber plants by inserting their sty-
Malaysia, Nigeria, Tanzania, etc. (Table 59.1). lets into the epidermis of the leaf, tender shoots,
Mealybug infestation had not been a major prob- main stem, inorescence, as well as the fruit. Due
lem on rubber until the recent introduction of the to the feeding, the leaves showed chlorosis, plant
mealybug Paracoccus marginatus in India. stunting, leaf deformation, early leaf and fruit
Among the mealybugs infesting rubber, except P. drop, heavy buildup of honeydew and consequent
marginatus, all are considered to be minor. sooty mould development on all plant parts, and
Ferrisia virgata were found attached to the roots drying of worst affected branches (Mani
hanging down from an African rubber tree (http:// Chellappan 2010).
bugguide.net/node/view/148641/bgpage).

Mealybug P. marginatus infestation on rubber plants

M. Chellappan (*)
Kerala Agricultural University,
Thrissur 680656, Kerala
e-mail: mani-chellappan@kau.in

Springer India 2016 557


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_59
558 M. Chellappan

Table 59.1 List of mealybugs recorded on rubber in different countries


Mealybug species Country Reference
Dysmicoccus sp. Sri Lanka Jayasinghe (1999)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) India
Florida http://bugguide.net/node/view/148641
Sri Lanka Jayasinghe (1999)
Leptorhizoecus deharvengi Indonesia Williams (2004)
(Williams)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus Egypt Hall (1921)
(Green)
Paracoccus marginatus Sri Lanka Galanihe et al.(2010)
(Williams and Granera de India Mani Chellappan (2010): Lyla and Philip (2010)
Willink) Jacob Mathew (2011)
Phenacoccus manihoti Nigeria Iheagwam (1981)
(Matile-Ferrero)
Planococcus citri (Rosso) Sri Lanka Jayasinghe (1999), Hill (2008)
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Malaysia Williams (2004)
Minnesota Venette and Davis (2004)
Planococcus tanzaniensis Tanzania Ben-Dov (1994)
(Cox)
Planococcus tanzaniensis sp. Cox (1989)
(nov.)
Pseudococcus cryptus Malaysia Williams (2004)
(Hempel)
Pseudococcus maritimus Sri Lanka Jayasinghe (1999)
(Ehrhorn)
Rastrococcus iceryoides Sri Lanka Jayasinghe (1999)
(Green)
Rasrococcus spinosus Malaysia Williams (2004)
(Robinson)

In Gampaha and Colombo districts of Sri Lanka,


P. marginatus has spread to rubber nurseries, 59.3 Natural Enemies
immature and mature rubber plantations in rubber-
growing districts. Especially, the papaya mealybug In southeastern Nigeria, Phenacoccus manihoti
disease infected only the rubber plants or trees on Cerea rubber tree (Manihot glaziovii) was
which are around the infected papaya trees. The found to be attacked by Spalgis lemolea (Druce)
main reason for this unfortunate incidence is that and Chrysopa sp. (Iheagwam 1981).
proper steps have not been taken timely to control.
Papaya mealybug infections are typically observed
as clusters of cotton-like masses on the rubber leaf 59.4 Spread
blades, leaf stems, and immature apex. The dam-
age symptoms can be clearly seen on the lower sur- Newly emerged nymphs of P. marginatus were
face of the leaf. The premature leaf fall, deformation greenish yellow, with oval-shaped body. Crawlers
of apex, and leaf curling may occur due to the sap- dispersed after emergence from the ovisac and
sucking by the mealybug. In addition, it can be started feeding. Active crawling of the early
observed that a fungus called sooty mould grows nymphal instars, wind-aided dispersion, through
on the excreta of this insect. The severely infected phoretic ants, bursting rubber seeds which reach
trees eventually died (http://www.plantationindus- 1518 m away from the parent tree, infested
tries.gov.lk/ dwnlds/ plantation/8.pdf). fallen leaves and cover crops. All vegetation in
59 Rubber 559

and around the rubber plantation, viz., %) or neem oil emulsion (12 %) as spray were
Eupatorium odoratum (Chromolena oderata), recommended to control the mealybugs.
Berrari sp., Lantana aculeata, Mimosa pudica, Application of thiamethoxam 25 %WG (@ 1 g/L,
lmpertala cylindrica, and a variety of other plants imidacloprid 480 SL (@ 1 mL/L), acetamiprid 20
had papaya mealybug infestation, including glyr- % (1 g in 1 L of water), and mineral oil (@ 5 mL/L)
icidia. Mulching with dry leaves, grass cuttings, was recommended to control P. marginatus
and cover crop looping around the plant, is rec- (Galanihe et al. 2010). Acephate, carbaryl, chlor-
ommended as a cultural operation for rubber pyrifos, diazinon, dimethoate, malathion, and
nurseries, and young seedlings also aggravated white mineral oils (Mani Chellappan 2010),
the problem. Also, the abnormal leaf fall in rub- dimethoate EC 40 % (1 mL in 1 L of water) / imi-
ber caused by the fungi Phytophthora palnivora dacloprid 20 % (1 mL in 1 L of water)/thiameth-
during wet weather coupled with humid condi- oxam 25 % (12 g in 1 L of water)/ acetamprid 20
tion and powdery mildew disease caused by fun- % (1 g in 1 L of water) (http:// www.plantationin-
gus Oidium heveae steinm on newly formed dustries.gov.lk/ dwnlds/ plantation/8.pdf) were
tender ush during the refoliation period of recommended to control P.marginatus on rubber.
January to March (symptoms including tender
leaves with ashy coating curl, crinkle, edges roll
inward and fall, leaving the petit. Die-back of 59.7 Biological Control
twigs also follows. On older leaves, white patches
appear causing necrotic spots affecting ower Biological control includes spraying entomo-
and tender fruits, which are shed affecting seed pathogenic fungus, viz., Verticilium leccanii (10
production) suppressed the actual symptom of g/L) in 5 % soap solution, encouraging the lepi-
the mealybug on rubber (Mani Chellappan 2010). dopteran predator, Spalgis epeus and release of
aphelinid Acerophagus papayae (Noyes and
Schauff). The parasitoid was found highly suc-
59.5 Management cessful in suppressing P. marginatus on rubber.
Kerala accounts for 92 % of the total area in India
Cultural management includes inspecting all under rubber cultivation, that is, 5.17lakhs ha.
papaya, temple trees, and other susceptible hosts Average production is 1949 kg/ha. Average price
in and around rubber plantations; burning and is Rs. 1619/kg; Yield reduction 10 %; Total
destroying the severely infected trees/parts of infested area49,500 ha; Saving Rs. 17.85 lakhs
trees immediately; avoiding transportation of (Mani Chellappan 2010).
infested plant material; avoiding pruned, infested
plant parts being left unattended or being placed
in garbage bins or vehicles; washing the insects References
off the plants with a powerful water jet; wrapping
polythene/spongy tapes impregnated with insec- Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
ticides around tree trunks to exclude ants from
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
the canopy; and unsettling the crawlers with a jet ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
of water. importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686p
Chellappan M (2010) Status of papaya mealybug,
Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de
Willink in Kerala. In: Shylesha AN, Joshi S, Rabindra
59.6 Chemical RJ, Bhumannavar BS (eds) Classical biological con-
trol of papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus in
Spraying soap solution (5 %) to dissolve the wax India Proceedings of the national consultation meet-
ing on strategies for deployment and impact of the
and expose the mealybug body to various methods
imported parasitoids of papaya mealybug. NBAII
of management and use of tobacco decoction (2 (ICAR), Begaluru, pp 4042
560 M. Chellappan

Cox JM (1989) The mealybug genus Planococcus Jayasinghe CK (1999) Pests and diseases of hevea rubber
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist and their geographical distribution. Bull Rubber Res
Entomol 58(1):178 Inst Sri Lanka 40:18
Galanihe LD, Jayasundera MUP, Vithana A, Lyla KR, Philip BM (2010) Incidence of papaya mealy-
Asselaarachchi N, Watson GW (2010) Occurrence, bug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de
distribution and control of papaya mealybug, Willink in Kerala. Insect Env 15(4):156
Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), Mathew J (2011) Status of papaya mealy bug on rubber in
an invasive alien pest in Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res Ext Kerala. In: Proceedings of the National consulation
13(3):8186 meeting on strategies for deployment and impact of
Hall WJ (1921) The hibiscus mealybug. Ministry Agric the imported parasitoids of papaya mealybug,
Egypt Tech Sci Ser Entomo Sec Bull 17:128 Classical biological control of papaya mealybug
Hill DS (2008) Pests of crops in warmer climate and their (Paracoccus marginatus) in India, p 60
control. Springer, Dordrecht, 625p Venette RC, Davis EE (2004) Mini risk assessment pas-
Iheagwam EU (1981) Natural enemies and alternative sionvine mealybug: Planococcus minor (Maskell)
hostplant of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus [Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera]. Department of
manihoti (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae) in south- Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, 30p
eastern Nigeria. Revue de Zool Afr 95(2):433438 Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Cashew
60
V. Ambethgar

Mealybugs are injurious to cashew plantations in (Ambethgar 2011). In South India, the rst out-
India, West Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, etc. break of F. virgata on cashew was discovered
(Table 60.1). during FebruaryMarch 1998 in Cuddalore dis-
In India, severe incidence of mealybugs was trict of Tamil Nadu. Ferrisia virgata is largely
observed on cashew in Maharashtra (Godse et al. dominant across the cashew-growing areas
2003), Tamil Nadu (Ambethgar et al. 2000), (Ambethgar et al. 2000).
Kerala, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh

Cashew infested with Ferrisia virgata

V. Ambethgar (*)
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University,
Regional Research Station,
Vridhachalam 606 001, Tamil Nadu, India
e-mail: drva1965@gmail.com

Springer India 2016 561


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_60
562 V. Ambethgar

Table 60.1 List of mealybugs recorded on cashew in different countries


Mealybug species Region/country References
Crisicoccus hirsutus (Newstead) Zanzibar and Pemba Islands Williams (2004)
Crisicoccus longispilosus (De Lotto) Zanzibar and Pemba Islands Williams and Matile-Ferrero (2005)
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) Africa De Lotto (1964)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) India Ambethgar et al. (2000);Williams
(2004); Maruthadurai et al. (2012)
Africa De Lotto (1964)
Tanzania Williams (1996)
Formicoccus nijalensis(Laing) West Africa Strickland (1947); Ben-Dov (1994)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) India Lad et al.(2013)
Paracoccus marginatus (Williams and India Chellappan et al. (2013)
Granara de Willink)
Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) India Maruthadurai et al.(2012)
Planococcoides nijalensis (Laing) Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus citri (Risso) India Rai (1984); Maruthadurai et al.
(2012)
Planococcus agellates (DeLotto) Africa De Lotto (1964)
Planococcus lilacinus (Cockerell) India Rai (1984); Maruthadurai et al.
(2012); Ambethgar et al. (2000)
Planococcus minor (Maskell) India Williams (2004)
The United States Venette and Davis (2004)
Plotococcus neotropicus (Williams de Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
Granara)
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Tanzania Maniania (2011)
-Tozzetti) Mozambique Topper (2002)
Rasrococcus spinosus (Robinson) Thailand Williams (2004)

Around the same period in 2001, there was


another major outbreak of mealybug species 60.1 Damage
Planococcus citri in the cashew-growing regions
of Villupuram district of Tamil Nadu. These All the commercially available graftedcashew
mealybugs were widespread and recorded in varieties are susceptible to the mealybug infesta-
eight other cashew-growing locations in Tamil tions at varying extent. Mealybugs have syringe-
Nadu. In Africa, Pseudococcus longispinus is a like sucking mouthparts that feed on
potential pest of cashew in parts of Tanzania and
Mozambique (Topper 2002).

Planococcus citri damage P. marginatus damage F.virgata damage


60 Cashew 563

The plants phloem, which contains the nutri- of black sooty mold fungi (Capnodium species)
ents needed for mealybug development. As that can result in further plant damage, because it
mealybugs digest their food, they excrete sugar- hastens the germination of sooty molds, which
rich uid called honeydew. Mealybugs also block light from the leaves and impede photosyn-
exude brous, white waxy beard that hangs from thetic efciency of plants. The honeydew and
the tree trunk and branches. In cashew, mealybug sooty mold contamination may also impair the
infestations are more often conned to short peri- quality of the cashewnut (Ambethgar et al. 2000).
ods, synchronizing with ushing through the Additionally, the feeding punctures resulting
fruiting season (February-May) rather than the from mealybug infestation facilitate secondary
remaining periods of the dormant season. Both infection of twig-blight disease caused by
nymphs and adults prefer to feed on the tender Pestalotia microspora (Ambethgar 2011).
shoots, nodes, petioles, leaves, inorescence, Severe outbreaks of mealybug have been
ower panicles, or developing fruit clusters reported on cashew, adversely affecting the yield
which are soft and succulent. Mealybugs, while of cashewnut over 80 % in extreme cases in the
desapping the plants, inject salivary toxins, which state of Tamil Nadu, India. Aapparent yield
resulted in malformed leaves, reduced plant losses in terms of raw cashewnut have been
vigor, stunted growth, and occasional death of reported to be varying from 7 to 16 % and 2350
branches. Severely infested cashew trees could % during 19981999 and 20032004, respec-
be easily sighted even from a distance by their tively (Ambethgar 2011). Such a massive yield
sickly appearance. On susceptible trees, affected losses occur when mealybugs infest fruit clusters
leaves showed a characteristic curling/premature or excrete honeydew that covers fruit and
senescence (yellowing), similar to the damage foliage.
caused by viruses. If ower blossoms were
attacked, the fruits could set poorly. When fruits
are infested, they could be entirely covered with 60.2 Seasonal Occurrence
the waxy white coating of the mealybug. Heavy of Mealybugs
infestation could lead to fruit rot drop, or fruits
remained on the bunch in a shriveled and dry Temperature is the driving force for mealybug
condition. Sometimes, the whole plants may wilt upsurge. The maximum mealybug population
and become stunted. New growth may become was found when dry and humid conditions pre-
distorted. vail from March to May. There has been positive
More importantly, the direct sap feeding on correlation between temperature and mealybug
developing fruit clusters results in ill-lled nut population, and also signicant negative correla-
meal/kernel formation, improper shell-split, and tion with relative humidity and total number of
reduced shelling outturn, which ultimately impair rainy days on mealybugs. The population of F.
the market value of cashewnuts. Besides, mealy- virgata is abundant during JanuaryMay, coin-
bug causes indirect physical damage as they ciding with active new ushing, owering, and
excrete the carbohydrate-rich clear sticky honey- fruit development periods of cashew in cashew
dew which can accumulate on the foliage and orchards. Four to ve generations are completed.
fruit clusters, and supports the growth of black The rapid population increase in summer is fol-
sooty mold fungus. Though honeydew can be lowed by an equally rapid decline after harvest.
dissolved even by a slight rain, they readily dry in Low precipitation of Northeast seasonal mon-
warm temperatures. When mealybug populations soon (OctoberDecember) is found to be favor-
are severe, honeydew can accumulate to form a able for the early buildup of mealybugs under the
hard, wax-like layer that covers the infested climatic conditions of Tamil Nadu. Once
plant, which clog stomatal openings and impede Southwest monsoon (MayJune) sets in due to
gas exchange and respiration. Undoubtedly, hon- heavy downpour of rain, mealybugs are washed
eydew serves as a substrate for the development out. Due to increase in humidity and decrease in
564 V. Ambethgar

the temperature, the mealybug population Diacamma rugosum (Le Guill), Monomorium
declines and becomes almost negligible. latinode (Forel), Oecophylla smaragdina
Continuous monsoon, low temperature, and (Fabricius), and Technomyrmex sp. (Ambethgar
humidity are detrimental for mealybug develop- 2002b) were found to be associated with mealy-
ment (Abdul Rahiman et al. 1995). bugs in cashew ecosystem. Mealybugs are known
to bribe ants with their sugary secretion called
honeydew, and in return, ants help in the spread-
60.3 Association of Ants ing of mealybugs and provide them protection
with Mealybugs from predators, parasitoids, and other natural
enemies (Bentley 1977). Most often, colonies of
Four ant species, viz., Anoplolepis longipes M. hirsutus are attended by red weaver ant
(Jerdon), A. gracilipes (Smith), Tapinoma indi- Oecophylla smaragdina. These ants are known to
cum (Ingar), T. melanocephalum (Fabricius) attack the natural enemies of mealybugs while
(Rickson and Rickson 1998), and seven species, attending the pests. Thus, ants can exacerbate
namely Camponotus compressus (Fabricius), C. mealybug pest problems by disrupting the natural
sericeus (Fabricius), Crematogaster sp., enemy activity in cashew.

M. hirsutus attended by O.samaragdina F.virgata attended by C.compressus

60.4 Management 60.5 Mealybug Monitoring

Prevention is better than cure. This principle is Farm-level regular monitoring, early detection,
highly applicable in the management of cashew and isolation of infested plants are important to
mealybugs. Mealybugs are best treated if detected avoid outbreaks. Visual plant inspection is an
early, when populations are low. Once they efcient way to detect early mealybug infesta-
become established, mealybugs are very difcult tions. Early infestations can be easily overlooked
to achieve effective control. Hence, a concomi- due to the mealybugs tendency to hide in pro-
tant use of pest monitoring, cultural, mechanical, tected locations. Presence of white ecks or waxy
biological, and chemical methods of control at residues along the leaf midribs, on leaf or stem
appropriate time have to be integrated for long- axils, and on the underside of leaves is an indica-
term management of mealybugs and to reduce tion of mealybug infestation. Honeydew, sooty
the yield loss. mold, and the presence of ants may also be indi-
cations of mealybug infestation.
60 Cashew 565

60.6 Cultural Management orchards, F. virgata was found parasitized by


Blepyrus insularis (Cameron) with 15 % parasit-
In orchards, individual cashew trees should be ism. Release of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri can
maintained in a healthy condition, avoiding water give excellent control of Ferrisia virgata as in the
stress by providing proper mulches around the case on guava ecosystem (Mani et al. 1990).
perimeter zone of trees. Clean orchard mainte- Similarly, P. citri on cashew was found parasit-
nance and proper fertility are important compo- ized by Angyrus pseudococci under eld condi-
nents of plant health management. If only a few tions with a mean parasitism of 23.0 % on cashew
plants are infested, selective removal and elimi- in Tamil Nadu. Planococcus citri was also found
nation of mealybug colonies at the initial pest causing very severe damage to the inorescence
infestation (JanuaryFebruary) can reduce the in Bangalore North, India. Two parasitoids,
pest load and prevent further attack (Ambethgar namely, Leptomastix dactylopii and Anagyrus
et al. 2000). Collection and destruction of the sp., and two predators, viz., Cryptolaemus mon-
mealybug-borne plant residues and dry foliage trouzieri and Spalgis epeus were recorded on P.
amidst infested trees during nut harvest (March cirti infesting cashew. The Brazilian encyrtid
April) is benecial to prevent further spread of parasitoid Leptomastix dactylopii (How) can be
the pest. Postharvest sanitation pruning of cashew utilized in the suppression of the mealybug
trees by judicial shearing of lanky and unthrifty Planococcus citri infesting cashew. Field infec-
twigs during dormant periods during JuneJuly, tions of Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) (Vuill.),
and their prompt clearing may help to improve Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) (Sorokin), and
the overall health of orchards. Removal of alter- Verticillium lecanii (Zimm.) (Veigas) on F. vir-
nate weed hosts and destruction of ant colonies gata were reported on enzootic levels in cashew
within the orchards are desirable to prevent ecosystem (Ambethgar 2002a; Ambethgar and
mealybug invasion. Water-stressed plants may Bhat 2008). Topical spray of B. bassiana (2 108
also be more susceptible to mealybugs. If feasi- conidia/mL) @ 50 g/100 mL of water produced
ble, a forceful or high-pressure water spray, at highest mortality of 76.33 % at the end of the
least twice per week, is effective in dislodging or 21st day (Ambethgar and Bhat 2008).
removing all life stages of mealybugs (eggs,
crawlers, and adults) quickly, thus preventing the
occurrence of outbreaks. On the other hand, cer- 60.8 Use of Botanical Pesticides
tain environmental conditions (e.g., temperature)
and luxuriant plant growth may increase the Foliar application of neem seed kernel extracts
mealybug population. For example, cashew (NSKE) (10 % at weekly intervals) provided
plants irrigated frequently and that receive high good control of F. virgata on cashew (Ambethgar
concentrations of a nitrogen-based fertilizer tend 2011). Foliar spray of neem oilsoap emulsion
to be more susceptible to mealybugs. (3 % at weekly intervals) is reported to control
mealybugs on cashew. For organic cashew farm-
ing, neem oil and fatty acid soaps may be bene-
60.7 Biological Control cial (Mahapatro 2008; Sunitha et al. 2009).

The current thrust in mealybug management is to


promote the biocontrol agents. Natural enemies 60.9 Chemical Control
such as parasitoids, predators, and pathogens
occasionally exert signicant control of Many organophosphates are effectively used for
mealybugs on cashew (Ambethgar et al. 2000). the control of mealybugs. Spray application of
In cashew orchards, natural biological control is dichlorvas 75 WSC @ 1.5 mL/L in combination
often restricted by the frequent use of insecti- with sh oil resin soap @ 25 g/L was found to be
cides that kill these natural enemies. In cashew effective in controlling the striped mealybug F.
566 V. Ambethgar

virgata on cashew (Ambethgar et al. 2000). Nadu. In: Mason PG, Gillespie DR, Vincent C (eds)
Proceedings of ISBCA 3, USDA-Forest Service,
Sprays of malathion (0.05 %) or monocrotophos
pp 562563
(0.05 %) or phosphamidon (0.03 %) or dimetho- Ambethgar V (2011) Field evaluation of some insecti-
ate (0.03 %) were recommended for the control cides against white-tailed mealybug, Ferrisia virgata
of F. virgata on cashew (Ambethgar 2011). Use (Cockerell) infesting cashew. In: Souvenir and abstract
of the international symposium on Cashew, 0912
of chlorpyriphos 20 EC @ 2.5 mL/L offered ade-
December 2011, Madurai, India, pp 131132
quate control of mealybugs in cashew. Foliar Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the
sprays of dichlorvas (0.05 %) was most effective, mealybugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera:
recording 93.5 % mealy bug reduction over con- Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data
on geographical distribution, host plants, biology
trol in 10 days after rst spray, and contributed to
and economic importance. Intercept Limited,
a maximum nut yield (1200 kg/ha (Ambethgar Andover, 686 p
2011). Triazophos (0.05 %) and profenophos Bentley BL (1977) The protective function of ants visiting
(0.05 %) were at par and recorded 91.292.5 % the extraoral nectaries of Bixa orellana L. (Bixaceae).
J Ecol 65:2738
reduction of mealybug over control, and contrib-
Chellappan M, Lawrence L, Indhu P, Cherian T, Anitha S,
uted to the nut yield of 11001125 kg/ha. Jimcymaria T (2013) Host range and distribution pat-
Currently, newer insecticides in the group of tern of papaya mealy bug, Paracoccus marginatus
neonicotinoids with more novel modes of action Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera:
Pseudococcidae) on selected Euphorbiaceae hosts in
have also gained in popularity for control of
Kerala. J Trop Agric 51(12):5159
mealybugs. Thiamethoxam (0.003 %) and imida- De Lotto G (1964) Observations on African mealy bugs
cloprid (0.005 %) were at par and recorded 91.2 (Hemiptera: Coccoidea). Bull Brit Mus Nat Hist
92.5 % reduction of mealybug over control with Entomol 14:343397
Godse SK, Bhole SR, Munj AY, Gurav SS (2003)
nut yield of 11001125 kg/ha (Ambethgar 2011).
Chemical control of mealybugs (Ferrisia virgata
Insecticides recommended for control of mealy- Cockerell). Cashew 17(2):1517
bugs in cashew production are carbaryl 50 WP Lad SK, Patil PD, Godase SK (2013) Record of mealy
(2.0 g/L), acephate 75 SP (1.0 g/L), chlorpyri- bugs infesting fruit crops in in Konkan Region of
Maharashtra. J Appl Zool Res 24(2):141145
phos 20 EC (2.5 mL/L), dichlorvas 76 WSC (1.5
Mahapatro GK (2008) Helopeltis management by chemi-
mL/L), dimethoate 30 EC (2.0 mL/L), malathion cals in cashew: A critical concern. Indian J Entomol
50 EC (2.0 mL/L), monocrotophos 36 WSC (1.5 70(4):293308
mL/L), phosphamidon 75 EC (1.0 mL/L), pro- Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A, Singh SP (1990) The impact
of the predator, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant,
fenophos 40 EC (1.5 mL/L), triazophos 40 EC
on pesticide-resistant populations of the striped mealy-
(2.0 mL/L), imidacloprid 17.8 SL (0.5 mL/L), bug, (Ckll.) on guava in India. Insect Sci Appl
thiamethoxam 25 WG (0.5 mL/L), and azadi- 11(2):167170
rachtin 0.03 EC (3.0 mL/L). Maniania NK (2011) Integrated management of major
insect pests and diseases of cashew in East and
Western Africa. Factsheet-BAF Advisory Service on
Agricultural Research for Development, Gotingen,
References Germany, pp 12
Maruthadurai R, Desai AR, Chidananda Prabhu HR,
Abdul Rahiman P, Vijayalakshmi CK, Reddy AGS (1995) Singh NP (2012) Insect pests of cashew and their man-
Occurrence and distribution of mealy bug in coffee. agement. Technical Bulletin 28/2012, ICAR Research
Kisan World 22(11):3940 Complex for Goa, India, 16 p
Ambethgar V, Lakshmanan V, Naina Mohammed SE Rai PS (1984) Hand book on cashew pests. Researchco
(2000) Managing mealybugs in cashew. Science and Publication, New Delhi, 124p
Technology, The Hindu, February 24, 2000 Rickson FR, Rickson MM (1998) The cashew nut,
Ambethgar V (2002a) Record of entomopathogenic fungi Anacardium occidentale (Anacardiaceae), and its
from Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry. J Entomol Res perennial association with ants: extraoral nectary
26(2):17 location and the potential for ant defense. Am J Bot
Ambethgar V (2002b) Insect visitors of cashew in North- 85(6):835849
Eastern Zone of Tamil Nadu. Progress Hortic Strickland AH (1947) Coccids attacking cacao
34(2):223229 (Fheobroma cacao L.), in West Africa, with descrip-
Ambethgar V, Bhat PS (2008) Entomogenous fungi asso- tions ofve new species. Bull Entomol Res
ciated with insect pests in cashew orchards of Tamil 38:497523
60 Cashew 567

Sunitha ND, Jagginavar SB, Biradar AP (2009) Entomology, University of Minnesota, St.Paul, USA,
Bioefcacy botanicals and newer insecticides against pp 130
grape vine mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus Williams DJ (1996) A synoptic account of the mealybug
(Green). Karnataka J Agric Sci 22:710711 genus Ferrisia (Hem., Pseudococcidae). Entomol
Topper CP (2002) Issues and constraints related to the Month Mag 132:110
development of cashew nuts from ve selected African Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
countries. International Trade Centre (ITC)-Common Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
Fund for Commodities (CFC), Reunion Regionale sur London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
le Developpement des Exportations de noix de Cajou Williams DJ, Matile-Ferrero D (2005) Mealybugs from
d Afrique, Cotonou, Bnin, pp 124 Zanzibar and Pemba islands with a discussion of a
Venette RC, Davis EE (2004) Mini risk assessment: pas- potential invasive species (Hemiptera,
sionvine mealybug, Planococcus minor (Maskell) Pseudococcidae). (Summary In French). Revue
(Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera). Department of Franyaise dEntomol 27(4):145152
Oil Palm
61
P. Kalidas

Mealybugs are injurious to oil palm (Elaeis 61.1 Damage


guineensis) in Angola, India, Ecuador, Colombia,
Malaysia Indonesia, Maldives, etc. (Table 61.1) Both Pseudococcus and Palmicultor species
Corley and Tinker (2007) reported mealybugs attack spindle leaves of young plants, resulting in
as pests attacking leaves and fruits in oil palm the yellowing of unfolding leaves and stunted
nursery as well as on eld palms. Some species growth of the palm. Dysmicoccus spp. are known
live on the roots of Elaeis, such as Dysmicoccus to infest the oil palm fresh fruit bunches by suck-
brevipes (Cockerell) in Ecuador (Mariau 2001). ing the sap from the mesocarp. When the harvest
Geococcus johorensis (Williams), when found is delayed, there will be severe loss to ripe fruit
originally in Malaysia on the roots of oil palm bunches. The mealybug attack leads to loosening
(Elaeis guineensis), was reported as causing yel- of the fruits, which leads to premature fruit drop.
lowing and early dieback of the leaves. The Dysmicoccus brevipes infests inorescences and
striped mealybug (Ferrisia virgata) is known to also unripe and ripe oil palm fruits (Dhileepan
infest African oil palm (Elaeis guineensis). and Jacob 1992; Ponnamma 1999). Mealybug
Palmicultor palmorum (Ehrhorn) was reported infestation has been reported on irrigated oil
on oil palm in India, infesting spear leaves palms of India (Kochu Babu and Kalidas 2004).
(Ponnamma 1999). The mealybug incidence is found to increase with
the age of the palms.

P. Kalidas (*)
Directorate of Oil Palm Research,
Pedavegi 534450, Andhra Pradesh, India
e-mail: pothinenikali@redif.com

Springer India 2016 569


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_61
570 P. Kalidas

Pseudococcus citricutus on spear leaves Dysmicoccus brevipes on Fruit Bunch

Table 61.1 List of mealybugs recorded on oil palm in different countries


Mealybug species Country/Region Reference
Cyperia angelica (De Angola De Lotto (1969), Ben-Dov (1994)
Lotto)
Dysmicoccus brevipes India Ponnamma (1999), Williams (2004)
(Cockerell) Ecuador Mariau (2001), https://www.plantvillage.com/topics/
oil-palm/infos
Colombia Orellana and Vera (1989)
Africa http://www.infonet-biovision.org/default/ct/94/pests
Dysmicoccus cocotis Neotropical region Williams and Granara de Willink (1992)
(Maskell)
Ferrisia virgata Neotropical region Williams and Granara de Willink (1992)
(Cockerell)
Geococcus johorensis India Williams (1969)
(Williams)
Nipaecoccus nipae Ecuador Mariau (2001); https://www.plantvillage.com/topics/
(Maskell) oil-palm/infos
Palmicultor palmorum India Williams (2004)
(Ehrhorn) Ecuador Mariau (2001); https://www.plantvillage.com/topics/
oil-palm/infos
Pseudococcus citricutus India Dhileepan and Jacob (1992), Kochu Babu and Kalidas
(Green) (2004), Kalidas (2012), Kalidas et al. (2002)
Pseudococcus cryptus India, Malaysia Williams (2004)
(Hempel) Indonesia, Maldives
Neotropical region Williams and Granara de Willink (1992)
Rhizoecus nr. Colombia Orellana and Vera (1989)
americanus (Hambleton)
Cyperia angolica (De Angola Ben-Dov (1994)
Lotto)
Dysmicoccus hambletoni E. guineensis Ecuador
(Williams and Granara
de Willink)
Nipaecoccus nipae Ben-Dov (1994)
(Makell)
61 Oil Palm 571

61.2 Management Dhileepan K, Jacob SA (1992) Pests. In: Oil Palm


Production Technology (ed) Central Plantation Crops
Research Institute. Research Centre, Palode,
Since mealybugs are often carried by ants, elimi- pp 4957
nation of the pest can easily be done by control of Kalidas P (2011) Strategies on pest management in oil
ants and by keeping the garden hygienic. Poor palm. In: Dhawan AK, Singh B, Singh R, Bhuller MB
(eds) Recent trends in integrated pest management.
hygienic conditions/sanitation practices are the
Indian Society for the Advancement of Insect Science,
major criteria for endemic infestation. Leaf prun- Ludhiana, pp 177185
ing and weeding at regular intervals are found to Kalidas P (2012) Pest problems of oil palm and manage-
keep the plantation free from the pest attack. ment strategies for sustainability. Agrotechnology
S11(001):2012. doi:10.4172/2168-9881.
Mealybug Dysmicoccus brevipes can potentially
S11-001Meilke
be controlled by natural enemies such as lady Kalidas P, Ramprasad KV, Rammohan K (2002) Pest sta-
beetles, but are commonly controlled using tus in irrigated oil palm orchards of coastal areas of
chemicals; chemical pesticides may also decrease India. J Indian Soc Coast Agric Res 20(1):4150
Kochu Babu M, Kalidas P (2004) Key pests and diseases
the populations of natural enemies, leading to
of Oil Palm in India Their biology, epidemiology
mealybug outbreaks (Kalidas 2011; https://www. and method of control. In: Proceedings of the interna-
plantvillage.com/topics/oil-palm/infos). When tional conference on the pests and diseases of impor-
the mealybugs become serious and are wide- tance to the Oil Palm Industry held in Malaysia during
18-19th May, 2004, Malaysia, pp 184206
spread, host-specic natural enemies can be uti-
Mariau D (2001) The fauna of oil palm and coconut
lized to control the mealybugs infesting oil palm. insect and mite pests and their natural enemies.
CIRAD, Montpellier, p 213
Orellana F, Vera HD (1989) Las Cochinillas harinosas
References (Dysmicoccus brevipes Cockerell y Rhizoecus prob,
americanus, Hamilleton) en viveros de palma africana
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- y su control. INiAP Ecuador Boletin Divulgativo no
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: 200, 8 p
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- Ponnamma KN (1999) Coccoids associated with oil palm
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic in India a review. Planter 75(882):445451
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p Williams DJ (1969) A revision of the genus Geococcus
Corley RHV, Tinker PB (2007) The oil palm, 4th edn. Green (Homoptera, coccoidea, Pseudococcidae). Bull
Blackwell Publishing, Great Britain, 561p Entomol Res 59:505517
De Lotto G (1969) On a few old and new soft scales and Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
mealybugs (Homoptera: Coccoidea). J Entomol Soc Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
South Afr 32(2):413422 London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
De Lotto G (1977) On some African mealybugs Williams DJ, Granara de Willink C (1992) Mealybugs of
(Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae). J Entomol central and South America. CAB International,
Soc South Afr 40(1):1336 London, 635p
Spices
62
S. Devasahayam and T.K. Jacob

Mealybugs are injurious to spice crops like black observed in all the taluks surveyed in Wayanad
pepper, cardamom, ginger, turmeric, etc. The (Kerala). The pest infestation was also observed
mealybug species recorded on various spice in Udumbanchola (Idukki district), Kozhikode
crops in different regions are listed in Table 62.1. (Kozhikode district), and Taliparamba (Kannur
district) taluks in Kerala. The pest infestation was
higher in Wayanad (8.021.1 %) and lower in
62.1 Black Pepper (Piper nigrum) Idukki (03 %). Stray infestations of the pest
were also observed in Kozhikode and Kannur dis-
In Indonesia, Planococcus citri and Ferrisia vir- tricts in Kerala. Among the taluks in Kerala, the
gata are reported to infest the aerial parts (shoots, percentage of vines infested by root mealybugs
leaves, spikes, and berries) of black pepper vines was higher in Vythiri (21.1 %) taluk. In Karnataka
(Kueh et al. 1993). In Sri Lanka, P. citri is reported state, mealybug infestation was conned to
to infest the roots of black pepper vines Kodagu and Hasan districts (Alur and Saklespur).
(Dharmadasa 2000), whereas in China, Mealybug infestation was higher in Kodagu (1.7
Planococcus sp. and P. lilacinus in Vietnam 15.1 %) district and lower in Hassan (04.4 %)
are known to infest the roots of black pepper vines district. Among the taluks in Kodugu district, the
(Sarma 2010). Twelve species of mealybugs are percentage of vines infested by root mealybugs
known to infest black pepper in India, and among was higher in Virajpet (15.1 %) taluk. Based on
them, the root mealybugs are the most severe the distribution pattern, it was concluded that a
(Devasahayam et al. 2009). According to these highly signicant and positive correlation
authors, the mealybugs Planococcus sp., (r = 0.451**) was observed between the pest
Planococcus citri, Planococcus lilacinus, Ferrisia infestation and altitude of the location. A mean of
virgata, and Dysmicoccus brevipes are known to 0.1 % of vines were infested at lower altitudes
infest the roots and basal regions of black pepper (0250 m above MSL) when compared to 8.9 %
vines in India and were conned to certain parts at higher altitudes (7511000 m above MSL).
of Kerala and Karnataka states. In Kerala, root
mealybug infestations on black pepper were
62.1.1 Damage

S. Devasahayam (*) T.K. Jacob In India, the incidence of mealybugs infesting the
Indian Institute of Spices Research, aerial parts of the vine (all species combined)
Marikunnu P. O., Kozhikode 673 012, Kerala, India was highest in Kasargod district (Kerala),
e-mail: devasahayam@spices.res.in

Springer India 2016 573


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_62
574 S. Devasahayam and T.K. Jacob

Table 62.1 List of mealybug species recorded on different spice crops


Mealybug species Country Reference
Black pepper (Piper nigrum)
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) India Devasahayam et al. (2009)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) India Rao (1926)
Indonesia Kueh et al. (1993)
Singapore Williams (2004)
Formicoccus polysperes sp.n. India Ramanujam et al. (2013)
Planococcus sp. India Koya et al. (1996)
China Sarma (2010)
Vietnam Sarma (2010)
Planococcus citri (Risso) India Nayar et al. (1976)
Indonesia Kueh et al. (1993)
Sri Lanka Dharmadasa (2000)
Planococcus lilacinus (Cockerell) China Sarma (2010)
Planococcus lilacinus (Cockerell) India Devasahayam et al. (2009)
Planococcus minor (Maskell) India Koya et al. (1996)
Indoneasia, Maldives, Malaysia Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus sp. India Koya et al. (1996)
Pseudococcus longispinus India Koya et al. (1996)
(Targioni-Tozzetti)
Pseudococcus orchidicola (Takahashi) India Koya et al. (1996)
Cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum)
Planococcus sp. India Narasimham (1987)
Planococcus citri (Risso) India David and Ananthakrishnan (2004)
Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) Pakistan Arif et al. (2009)
Dysmicoccus debregeasiae (Green) India and Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus subterreus sp.n. India Williams (2004)
Ginger (Zingiber ofcinale)
Pseudococcus sp. Fiji Ernhorn and Whitney (1926)
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) Africa Anonymous (2012)
Indonesia Williams (2004)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) India Williams (2004)
Formicoccus polysperes sp.n. India Williams (2004)
Niapecoccus nipae (Maskell) Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus cryptus (Hempel) Thailand Williams (2004)
Rhizoecus amorphophalli (Betrem) India, Java, and Hawaii Williams (2004)
Phenacoccus parvus (Morrison) Ethiopian, Neotropical, and Ben-Dov (1994)
Pacic region
Turmeric (Curcuma longa)
Planococcus sp. India Devasahayam (2006)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
Paracoccus marginatus (Williams and India Chellappan et al. (2013)
Granara de Willink)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) India Bhatt (2010)
Rastrococcus iceryoides (Green) India Williams (2004)
(continued)
62 Spices 575

Table 62.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Country Reference
Betel vine (Piper betle)
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) India Williams (2004)
Formicoccus polysperes sp.n. India Williams (2004)
Geococcus citrinus (Kuawna) India Williams (2004)
Coriander (Coriandrum sativum)
Paracoccus ferrisi (Ezzat and Mexico Ben-Dov (1994)
McConnel)
Cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum)
Rastrococcus lamingtoniensis Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
(Williams)

followed by Idukki district (Kerala), wherein 2.7 were covered with mulch. The pest infestation
and 2.3 % of leaves of affected vines (5.4 %) results in defoliation, yellowing and wilting of
were infested (Koya et al. 1996). The aerial infes- leaves and lateral branches, and also mortality of
tation of mealybugs such as F. virgata and P. citri vines in severe cases of infestation (Devasahayam
is mainly seen on tender shoots, leaves and et al. 2009). Various intercrops (coconut,
spikes, especially in the nursery. Planococcus arecanut, coffee, banana, colocasia, cardamom,
minor, P. longispinus, and P. orchidicola are gen- and turmeric) grown in black pepper gardens
erally encountered within old leaf galls induced were found infested with root mealybugs. Root
by leaf gall thrips (Liothrips karnyi Bagn.), prob- mealybug infestations were observed on black
ably due to the conducive microclimatic condi- pepper vines trailed on all standards (support
tions within them (Devasahayam 2000). In trees like silver oak, Erythrina spp., and jack-
nursery plants, infestations by F. virgata and fruit) (Devasahayam et al. 2009). Continuous
P. citri result in wilting of the affected parts. infestation without proper management leads to
gradual decline and death of the vine. The infes-
tation is generally greater during the post-mon-
soon season and lesser during summer months.

62.1.2 Associated Organisms

62.1.2.1 Pathogens
The fungus Phytophthora capsici (Leonian) and
nematodes such as Meloidogyne incognita
(Kofoid and White) (Chitwood), and Radopholus
similis (Cobb) were commonly associated with
Ferissia virgata on black pepper root mealybug infested vines. At Wayanad and
Kozhikode districts, all the root mealybug
Colonies of root mealybugs are distributed on infested vines examined (n = 104) were also
the main, secondary, and tertiary roots, basal infested with either Phytophthora and nematodes
region of stems on rooted cuttings in the nursery, or both. The infested vines exhibited symptoms
and also on the vines of all age groups in the eld. such as rotting of roots, absence of feeder roots,
The mealybug colonies are observed even up to a yellowing and wilting of leaves, defoliation, and
depth of 2 ft below the soil in severely affected mortality of vines that are characteristically asso-
vines. The infestation on the basal regions of the ciated with P. capsici and nematode infections.
stem is seen under the soil and also when they At a few locations in Wayanad district, the root
576 S. Devasahayam and T.K. Jacob

mealybug colonies were covered with a fungus ed as an undetermined species of Planococcus


(unidentied) which formed a soil-encrusted sp. The other species of root mealybugs were not
globular covering lined with mycelium. The covered with the fungus (Devasahayam et al.
mealybug associated with the fungus was identi- 2009).

Root mealybug infestation Root mealybug infestation on Phytophthora and nematode


on the basal region of the stem rooted cuttings in the nursery association with root mealybug
infestations in the eld

The fungus Diacanthodes philippinensis tricts in Kerala and Karnataka (Bhat et al. 2003a,
(Pat.) (Singer) is reported to be associated with P. b, 2005)
lilacinus on coffee in India, and whenever both
occurred together, the plants wilted and died.
Infestation by the mealybug alone did not cause 62.1.3 Ants
the death of coffee plants (Sekhar 1964; Chacko
and Sreedharan 1981). In Africa, the coffee root Three species of ants, namely, Anaplolepis sp.,
mealybug, which was earlier identied as P. citri Crematogaster sp., and Technomyrmex sp., and
and associated with the fungus D. novoguineesis two unidentied species were associated with
(Hennings) Fidalgo, has been later described as a root mealybug colonies. In many cases, it was
new species, P. fungicola (Watson and Cox easier to identify infested vines based on the
1990). The fungus is considered as a symbiont activity of the ants (Devasahayam et al. 2009).
providing protected cavities on the root surface in
which the mealybugs live in return for the sugars
in the honeydew excreted by them and in the sap 62.1.4 Natural Enemies
that escapes from the insects feeding punctures in
the roots (Fidalgo 1962). On black pepper, Leptacis sp. (Platygasteridae)
Ferrisia virgata and P. citri were identied to and Blepyrus insularis (Cam.) (Encyrtidae) were
transmit Piper Yellow Mottle Virus (PYMoV), found parasitizing Pseudococcus sp. and F. vir-
the badnavirus, causing stunt disease which is gata, respectively, infesting on the aerial parts of
increasingly becoming serious, especially at the vine (Devasahayam and Koya 1998). Larvae
higher altitudes in Wayanad and Kodagu dis- of Spalgis sp. (Spaligidae) were observed to
62 Spices 577

predate on root mealybug colonies, especially three times a season, has been recommended.
those at the base of the stems (Devasahayam Use of Erythirna variegata (L.) and E. orientalis
et al. 2009). (Murr.) as live supports is not advocated (Sarma
2010). In Indonesia, spraying albolineum (200
250 mL in 18 L water) or dimethoate (3540 mL
62.1.5 Management in 18 L water) or malathion (45 mL in 18 L water)
has been suggested for controlling P. citri and F.
virgata (Kueh et al. 1993).
Microbial Pathogens The fungal pathogen
Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) (Sorokin) was 62.1.5.1 Integrated Management
found to cause 79.6 % reduction in mealybug In India, an integrated pest management strategy
population, 30 days after treatment under labora- for the management of root mealybugs was
tory conditions (Devasahayam and Koya 2000). developed based on eld trials conducted with
promising insecticides and plant products. The
Natural Products Alcoholic extracts (3 %) of strategy involves planting root mealybug-free
Azadirachta indica and Vitex negundo; tobacco rooted cuttings in the eld, removal of weeds in
extract (3 %); custard apple seed extract (2 %); the interspaces of black pepper vines during sum-
and agro spray oil (3 %) are known to cause up to mer, drenching tobacco extract (3 %) or custard
75 % reduction in root mealybug population, 30 apple seed extract (2 %) on mildly affected vines,
days after treatment. Among the neem products, or drenching imidacloprid (0.0125 %) or aceta-
Nimbicidine (0.5 %) was the most effective, maprid (0.0125 %) or carbosulfan (0.075 %) or
resulting in 60 % reduction in the population of chlorpyriphos (0.075 %) on the affected vines,
root mealybugs, 30 days after treatment and adoption of control measures against
(Devasahayam 2006). Phytophthora and nematode infections
(Devasahayam 2006). Adequate care should be
Insecticides In India, imidacloprid (0.0125 %), taken to ensure that the insecticide solution per-
acetamaprid (0.0125 %), and carbosulfan colates down to the roots while drenching the
(0.075 %) were more promising, resulting in over vines.
90 % reduction in the population of root mealy-
bugs, 30 days after treatment under laboratory
conditions (Devasahayam 2006). Dimethoate, References
parathion-methyl, and quinalphos were the most
effective against the pepper mealybug F. virgata Anonymous (2012) Mealybugs. Available at: http://www.
infonet-biovision.org/print/ct/94/pests. Accessed 1
in Karnataka, India (Prasad Kumar et al. 1998).
Nov 2012
In Sri Lanka, cleaning the base of the vine, adopt- Arif MI, Raq M, Ghaffar A (2009) Host plants of cotton
ing control measures against ants, drenching the mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis): a new menace to
base of the plant with pronil 50 G-SC (5 mL in cotton agroecosystem of Punjab, Pakistan. Int J Agric
Biol 11:163167
10 L of water) and applying carbofuran 3G (10
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
15 g per vine) (Dharmadasa 2000), or drenching bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
the base of the vine with chlorpyriphos (28 mL in Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
12 L water) (Sarma 2010) have been recom- ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
mended for the management of root mealybug P.
Bhat AI, Devasahayam S, Hareesh P, Preethi N, Tresa T
citri. In Malaysia, spraying deltamethrin (0.1 %) (2003a) Planococcus citri (Risso)-an additional
at biweekly intervals, ve to six times, has been mealybug vector of badna-virus infecting black pep-
suggested for the control of mealybugs such as P. per (Piper nigrum L.) in India. Entomon 30:16
Bhat AI, Devasahayam S, Sarma YR, Pant RP (2003b)
citri and F. virgata affecting the aerial parts of the
Association of a badna-virus with black pepper (Piper
vine. Alternatively, spraying of albolineum nigrum L.) transmitted by mealybug (Ferrisia virgata)
(white oil) 72 % (16.5 mL/L), not more than in India. Curr Sci 84:15471550
578 S. Devasahayam and T.K. Jacob

Bhat AI, Devasahayam S, Venugopal MN, Bhai RS (2005) Dharmadasa M (2000) Management of insect pests of
Distribution and incidence of viral disease of black export agricultural crops. Department of Export
pepper (Piper nigrum L.) in Karnataka and Kerala, Agriculture, Matale, 31 p
India. J Plantn Crop 33:5964 Ernhorn EM, Whitney LA (1926) Division of plant
Bhatt NA (2010) Mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis inspection, MayAugust 1926. Hawaii For Agric
Tinsley (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae)] a serious pest 23:106109
of tobacco in Gujarat. Insect Environ 16(2):9091 Fidalgo O (1962) Type studies and revision of the genus
Chacko MJ, Sreedharan K (1981) Control of Planococcus Diacanthodes Sing. Rickia 1:145180
lilacinus and Diacanthodes sp. associated with coffee Koya KMA, Devasahayam S, Selvakumaran S, Kallil M
roots. J Coff Res 11:7680 (1996) Distribution and damage caused by scale
Chellappan M, Lawrence L, Indhu P, Cherian T, Anitha S, insects and mealy bugs associated with black pepper
Jimcymaria T (2013) Host range and distribution pat- (Piper nigrum Linnaeus) in India. J Entomol Res
tern of papaya mealy bug, Paracoccus marginatus 20:129136
Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Kueh TK, Gumbek M, Wong TH, Chin SP (1993) A eld
Pseudococcidae) on selected Euphorbiaceae hosts in guide to diseases, pests and nutritional disorders of
Kerala. J Trop Agric 51(12):5159 black pepper in Sarawak. Department of Agriculture,
David BV, Ananthakrishnan TN (2004) General and Kuching, 78 p
applied entomology. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing, Narasimham AU (1987) Scale insects and mealybugs on
New Delhi, 1184 p coffee, tea and cardamom and their natural enemies.
Devasahayam S (2000) Bioecology of leaf gall thrips J Coff Res 17(1):713
Liothrips karnyi Bagnall infesting black pepper. PhD Nayar KK, Ananthakrishnan TN, David BV (1976)
thesis, University of Calicut, 199 p General and applied entomology. Tata McGraw-Hill
Devasahayam S (2006) Bioecology and integrated man- Publishing Co. Ltd., New Delhi, 589 p
agement of root mealybug (Planococcus sp.) infesting Ramanujam B, Mohanraj P, Ballal CR, Venkatesan T,
black pepper. Final Report, ICAR Ad-Hoc Research Joshi S, Shylesha AN, Rangeshwaran R, Murthy KS,
Scheme, Indian Institute of Spices Research, Calicut, Mohan M, David KJ, Verghese A, Basha H (2013)
24 p Annual progress report 201213, AICRP on biological
Devasahayam S, Koya KMA (1998) Biological control of control of crop pests and weeds. National Bureau of
insect pests of black pepper. In: Zacharaiah TJ, Eapen Agriculturally Important Insects, Bangalore
SJ (eds) Annual report for 1997. Indian Institute of Rao YR (1926) The pollu disease of pepper. J Madras
Spices Research, Calicut, p 68 Agric Stud Union 14:5
Devasahayam S, Koya KMA (2000) Evaluation of ento- Sarma YR (2010) Integrated pest and disease manage-
mopathogenic fungi against root mealybug infesting ment in black pepper (Piper nigrum L.). International
black pepper. In: Abstracts, Entomocongress 2000, Pepper Community, Jakarta & Spices Board, Kochi,
58 November 2000, Trivandrum, Association for 80 p
Advancement of Entomology, Trivandrum, pp 3334 Sekhar PS (1964) Entomology in India. In: Pests of cof-
Devasahayam S, Koya KMA, Anandaraj M, Thomas T, fee. Entomological Society of India, New Delhi, 529 p
Preethi N (2009) Distribution and bio-ecology of root Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
mealybugs associated with black pepper (Piper Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
nigrum Linnaeus) in Karnataka and Kerala, India. London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
Entomon 34:147154
Mulberry
63
J.B. Narendra Kumar, M.A. Shekhar,
and Vinod Kumar

Mealybugs are injurious to mulberry (Morus Maconellicoccus hirsutus was rst detected on
spp.) in several countries (Table 63.1). Mulberry mainland US in August, 1999 in Imperial Valley,
is the sole food plant of the silkworm, Bombyx a low desert region in southern California on
mori L., the producer of fabulous silk which mulberry (Roltsch et al. 2006).
derives all the nutrients for its growth from the
mulberry leaf. Mealybugs pose serious threat to Seasonal Development In south India, though
mulberry cultivation mainly in India. Mulberry the pest is observed to infest mulberry throughout
fruits are edible, and can be great for health in the year, the incidence was highest during sum-
some countries. Production of appreciable quan- mer (34.93 %) and least during winter (9.45 %)
tity of quality mulberry leaf is hampered by the with an average incidence of 22.15 % (Hemalatha
mealybugs in silk-producing states in India. and Shree 2008; Sathya Prasad and Manjunath
Among the mealybug species, Maconellicoccus 1992). According to Narendra Kumar et al.
hirsutus and Paracoccus marginatus in plains (2006), in Bangalore rural district, the mealybug
and Paraputo sp. in the hilly regions caused dras- incidence reached its peak during April (18.79
tic reduction in mulberry leaf yield thereby %) and gradually started declining afterwards,
affecting the silk industry. and lowest incidence of 2.56 % was recorded
during December. Pink mealybug passes through
1015 generations in a year and was found active
63.1 Pink Hibiscus mealybug, even during winter months without any hiberna-
Maconellicoccus hirsutus tion (Rajadurai 2005b). Further, it completes its
life cycle in 2429 days on mulberry (Misra
In India, Misra (1919) reported for the rst time, 1919). However, Dhahira Beevi (1989) reported
the attack on mulberry by M. hirsutus. Though that total life span of the mealybug was 30.6 days
the pest is known to attack mulberry almost since for female while it was 22.7 days for males on
a century, it has assumed the key pest status, mulberry.
especially in Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Andhra
Pradesh only about one and a half decade back Damage Mealybugs cause damage to mulberry
(Sriharan et al. 1979; Baskaran et al. 1994). crop by sucking the sap from young leaves and
buds. As mealybugs suck and feed, they inject
J.B.N. Kumar (*) M.A. Shekhar V. Kumar into the plant a toxic saliva that results in mal-
Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, formed leaf and shoot growth, stunting and occa-
Mysore 570 008, India sional death (Lavanya Latha et al. 2004; Rajadurai
e-mail: jbnarendra@gmail.com

Springer India 2016 579


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_63
580 J.B.N. Kumar et al.

Table 63.1 List of mealybug species recorded on mulberry in different regions in the world
Species Region/country References
Atracoccus fuscus (Borchsenius) Turkmenistan Ben-Dov (1994)
Crisicoccus maricola Tang Mongolia Ben-Dov (1994)
Ferrisia virgata (Ckll.) Egypt Attia (2006)
Formicoccus lateens sp.n India Williams (2004)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green India Misra (1919), Raichoudhury (1958),
Manjunath et al. (1996)
China Snchez (2000)
Brazil de Almeida and Fonseca (2000)
Egypt Hall (1926)
Canada Garland (1998)
California Roltsch et al. (2006)
Philippines Mundo (1984)
Pakistan Zaman et al. (1996); Sahito et al.
(2012)
Bangladesh Ali and Ahmed (1990)
Iran Fallahzadeh et al. (2002)
Nipaecoccus vastator (Maskell) Iraq El-Haidari et al. (1978)
Niapecoccus viridis (Newstead) Pakistan Williams (2004)
Paracoccus marginatus Williams and India Mani Chellappan et al. (2013);
Granara de Willink Mahalingam et al. (2010); Shekhar
et al. (2011); Prasad et al. (2012)
Paraputo sp. India Misra et al. (1996); Biswas et al.
(2002)
Peliococcus mesaiaticus Borchsenius Afghanistan Ben-Dov (1994)
& Kozarzhevskaya
Phenacoccus divericatus sp.n. Pakistan & India Williams (2004)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Pakistan Williams (2004)
Planococcus minor Maskell Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus comstocki (Kuw.) California Bartlett and Clancy (1972)
Central Asia Kryachko (1978)
Armenia Oganesyan and Babayan (1979)
Crimea (USSR) Romanchenko and Belskaya (1981)
Georgia Kanchaveli and Partsvaniya (2009)
Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni India Sakthivel et al. (2011)
Tozzetti)
Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrhorn) Nearctic & neotropical Ben-Dov (1994)
Spilococcus mari (Siraiwa) Japan Ben-Dov (1994)
Trionymus mori Lobdell Mississippi Ben-Dov (1994)

2005a). The damage by the pink mealybug gives mity symptom caused due to pink mealybug
disease like appearance called as tukra. A heavy infestation.
black sooty mould develops on the infested leaves
and stem as a result of honey dew excretions by The extent of damage by the pink mealybug in
the mealybug. Earlier tukra in mulberry was mis- mulberry is reported to be 34.24 % (Manjunath
taken for a viral disease and mealybugs were et al. 1996) leading to an estimated leaf yield loss
believed to be the vectors of the same of about 4,500 kg/ha/year with a cocoon crop loss
(Rangaswamy et al. 1976). Later it was discov- of about 1015 % (Manjunath et al. 2000;
ered that so-called tukra disease is only a defor- Rajadurai and Thyagarajan 2003). Due to this, the
63 Mulberry 581

sericulturists are constrained to forego a rearing of and least in Dharmapuri (12.06 %) and Thanjavur
about 450 layings/ha/year, thus reducing cocoon districts of Tamil Nadu, India (Baskaran et al.
production by about 300350 kg/ha/year (Kumar 1994). Mealybug infestation had resulted in 30 to
et al. 1995) which works out to be Rs. 60,000 40 % loss in mulberry leaf yield (Nighat Mehmood
70,000 annually. Severe incidence of the mealy- 2004). In West Bengal, a leaf yield loss of 7.95 to
bug has been reported in Erode district (63.12 %) 11.03 % has been reported (Anonymous 2011).

Eggs of M. hirsutus Mealybug damage to mulberry Female M. hirsutus

63.1.1 Varietal Tolerance/ affected with tukra in Ambari-Falkata area. In


Susceptibility Sabour area (Bihar state), mealybug damage was
recorded highest on mulberry in variety S-763
Pink mealybug incidence is varying in different (22 %) followed by S-799 (18 %), S-1310, C-776,
mulberry varieties but there is no mulberry vari- Tr-4 and Tr-10 (14 %). Varieties such as C-741,
ety resistant to M. hirsutus available in India C-1608, C-1729 and C-1730 were not affected by
(Ganesan 1994). In Karnataka, among the ruling tukra. Among mulberry varieties M-5, MR-2,
mulberry varieties, S36, S34, S13, K2 and V1, Kosen, Ichinose, Gosoerami, BC2-59, Tr-4 and
the mealybug damage was least in V1 (44 %) fol- S-13, mealybug damage was more in Ichinose and
lowed by K2 (66 %) and maximum incidence least in Kosen and BC2-59 (Babu et al. 1994).
was observed in S36 & S34 (87 %) (Sathya
Prasad et al. 2000). Under eld conditions in
Bangalore rural district, the pest was found to 63.1.2 Management
prefer S-36 variety (24.56 %) followed by V-1
(18.32 %) & RFS-175 (13.44 %) whereas M-5 Chemical Control Spraying 0.2 % dichlorvos
(4.17 %) and local varieties (2.38 %) were least in 0.5 % soap solution twice at an interval of 10
preferred (Narendra Kumar et al. 2006). days and allowing 15 days waiting period before
Preference of mealybugs towards the newly using the leaves as feed for silkworm was recom-
evolved mulberry varieties may be attributed to mended (Anonymous 2010a). In California, mul-
high contents of moisture, sugar and protein berry trees infested with M. hirsutus were treated
compared to M-5 and local varieties (Savithramma with imidacloprid and thiamethoxam which were
and Dandin 2000). In West Bengal, among the found effective against the pink mealybug (Castle
mulberry genotypes namely Kajili, S-1, S-778, and Prabhaker 2011).
S-799, S-1301 and S-1531, the genotypes S-1
and S-799 were less susceptible to mealybug Botanicals Spraying of neem oil effectively
damage in Berhampore area, and on the contrary controlled the infestation of M. hirsutus
same varieties along with Tr-10 were severely (Ravikumar et al. 2010). Both neem seed kernel
582 J.B.N. Kumar et al.

extract and Pongamia seed kernel extract were single dose and irrigated once in 6 days than
found to be more effective than seed oils against applying nitrogenous fertilizer as a split dose and
mealybug (Narendra Kumar et al. 2006). providing irrigation either once in 6 days or 8
Spraying with 0.03 % Azdirachtin was recom- days.
mended for the mealybug control @ 5 ml/litre
(safety period: 10 days) (Anonymous 2010a). Mechanical Method The mechanical control of
mealybugs includes clipping of infested portion
Cultural Method Kasi Reddy et al. (2004) by sickle or secateur, collecting them in a poly-
reported that raising of maize as intercrop in mul- thene bag or bucket and destroying them by burn-
berry plantation increased the population of pred- ing or dipping in 0.5 % soap solution (Rajadurai
ator, Cheilomenes sexmaculata, (Fabricius) 2005a). According to Tomy Philip et al. (2002),
doubly (44 %) compared to the mulberry without chopping the affected portion and killing the
intercrop (21 %) resulting in the suppression of mealybugs either by burning or dipping them in
the pink mealybug population by 84 %. Growing 0.5 % DDVP with 0.5 % soap solution after prun-
cowpea as intercrop with mulberry enhances the ing or leaf harvest was found to be effective in
population of predatory ladybird beetles such as reducing mealybug population in mulberry.
C. sexmaculata, which initially feeds on cowpea
aphids and slowly shifts over to mulberry mealy-
bugs later (Jayaraj 2006). Sidde Gowda and 63.1.3 Biological Control
Kumar (1995) recommended Hibiscus cannabi-
nus as trap crop. Mealy bug population was sig- In West Bengal, India it is recommended to
nicantly low in mulberry with the trap crop release predatory ladybird beetles, Cryptolaemus
(3.14 %) compared to mulberry without the trap montrouzieri Mulsant @250 adults/ac or Scymnus
crop (11.44 %). As the trap crop facilitates better coccivora Ayyar @500 adults/ac in two split
colonization of M. hirsutus, it can also pave way releases during Oct-Nov and Jan-Feb to suppress
for preventing migration of the recommended the mealybugs (Santha Kumar et al. 1995;
predatory beetles from the release sites so that Anonymous 2010a).
they can effectively suppress the population of Complete control of M. hirsutus was achieved
M. hirsutus on mulberry. Manjunath et al. (2003) in Egypt, by introducing Anagyrus kamali Moursi
also indicated a signicant difference in mealy- (Encyrtidae) from Java, and then later in
bug damage in mulberry with H. cannabinus Caribbean islands and Florida. M. hirsutus
(4.28 %) as trap crop compared to mulberry as appeared on mulberry in California in 1999.
sole crop (26.02 %). Subsequently, the parasitoids Anagyrus kamali,
Samuthiravelu et al. (2005) reported that Gyranusoidea indica Shafee, Alam & Agarwal
mealybug infestation was minimized by reduced (Encyrtidae) and Allotropa sp. nr. mecrida
application of nitrogenous fertilizer blended with (Walker) (Platygastridae) were released for per-
neem cake @60 kg/ac (3 %) followed by pon- manent establishment on mulberry trees. The
gamia cake (4 %), mahua cake (4.4 %) and castor population density of M. hirsutus within the rst
cake (7.9 %) compared to control with recom- year was reduced by approximately 95 %.
mended dose of chemical fertilizer (20.8 %). Anagyrus kamali was the predominant parasitoid
Lavanya Latha et al. (2004) also reported that of M. hirsutus (Roltsch et al. 2006). Such intro-
limited irrigation once in 10 days and 25 % duction of A. kamali to India should be tried
reduced nitrogenous fertilizer applied in two split against M. hirsutus in mulberry gardens.
doses brought down the mealybug incidence to
1.60 % from 8.5 % in control with recommended 63.1.3.1 Integrated Pest
dose of fertilizer. In addition, Narendra Kumar Management (IPM)
et al. (2006) found that mealybug incidence was The Integrated Pest Management package against
more when nitrogenous fertilizer was applied as a pink mealybug includes clipping and destruction
63 Mulberry 583

of affected terminal portion, spraying of 0.2 % assumed the status of a major pest resulting in
DDVP with 0.5 % soap solution and release of C. huge losses to farmers in Tamil Nadu, Karnataka,
montrouzieri @250 adults/acre. The per cent Kerala (Shekhar and Qadri 2009; Krishnakumar
reduction in mealybug damage ranged from and Rajan 2009; Mahalingam et al. 2010).
73.21 to 88.81 whereas the increase in leaf yield
ranged from 3416.68 to 4750 kg/ha/year.
Narendra Kumar et al. (2006) also recommended 63.2.1 Damage
that the IPM practice involving the application of
5 % Neem seed kernel extract on 10th and 20th In mulberry, the papaya mealybugs infest leaf
day after pruning (DAP) integrated with release buds, leaves, stem portion, stump portion after
of predatory ladybird beetles @ 250/acre and top pruning, etc. They are found congregating all
clipping on 45th DAP proved better in control- along the veins on the lower side of the leaves.
ling the mealybug wherein the pest suppression Since they suck the plant sap continuously,
was recorded to an extent of 82.17 % (Manjunath affected leaves turn yellow and the plant growth
and Katiyar (1995). retards. In addition to sucking of plant sap they
also inject toxic substance through their saliva,
which causes deformation of plant parts. Due to
63.2 Papaya mealybug, profuse honey dew secretion, black sooty mould
Paracoccus marginatus secretion is also formed. When the mealybugs
infest with heavy population, the plants will end
Paracoccus marginatus popularly known as up with drying and death. Due to large quantity
papaya mealybug (PMB) has been accidentally of honey dew secretion, lots of ants will be
introduced in to south India and posing serious attending to them which arrive to feed on the
threat to several crops including mulberry. It sweet honey dew (Shekhar and Qadri 2009).

P. marginatus Papaya Mealybug damage Acerophagus papayae


to mulberry

63.2.2 Management be not safe to silkworms (Anonymous 2010b).


Fish Oil Rosin Soap @ 25 g/litre recorded the
Chemical Insecticides were recommended until lowest infestation (2.22 %) one day after treat-
the importation of parasitoids in India. ment (Suresh et al. 2010).
Profenophos 50 EC @ 2 ml/litre was the most
effective in knocking down the pest population Biological Control A total of 13 local natural
followed by dimethoate, imidacloprid, dichlor- enemies were reported attacking P. marginatus in
vos and acephate (Mahalingam et al. 2010). But India. Spalgis epius Westwood is seen devouring
profenophos was found to be toxic to silkworms all the stages of the mealybug in several mulberry
even 60 days after spray and hence considered to gardens (Sakthivel et al. 2010; Shekhar et al.
584 J.B.N. Kumar et al.

2011). However the indigenous predators are not tation was recorded (Qadri et al. 2011).
so effective in managing the huge populations of Surprisingly the pest incidence was reduced to
papaya mealybug. Since P. marginatus is an mere 1 % within 56 months of release. Saving
exotic pest, a classical biological control pro- the mulberry crop thereby increasing the cocoon
gramme was initiated, and the parasitoid A. papa- production has resulted in savings to the tune of
yae was imported by National Bureau of few crores of rupees in Karnataka.
Agriculturally Important Insects (ICAR),
Bangalore during July 2010 (Shylesha et al. Kerala Paracoccus marginatus appeared on
2010). The parasitoid was multiplied and released mulberry in 2009 in Idukki, Wyanad, Palakkad,
in farmers gardens through extension units of Malappuram, Thrissur districts of Kerala
Department of Sericulture of the southern states (Krishnakumar and Rajan 2009). Mulberry is
of India (Qadri et al. 2011). cultivated in about 300 acres in Kerala. Due to
release of Acerophagus papayae in 2011, mul-
berry crop worth few lakhs was saved. The suc-
63.3 Impact Analysis of Classical cess of classical biological control using A.
Biological Control of Papaya papayae has emerged as an excellent model
Mealybug in Mulberry reviving the sericulture to normalcy in the entire
in South India Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala.

Tamil Nadu There was 60 % damage by 63.4 Root mealybug Paraputo sp.
papaya mealybug in Tamil Nadu (T.N.). A total
area of 10,000 acres of mulberry gardens was Mulberry plantations in hilly areas of Northern
found infested with P. marginatus. It was esti- India such as Darjeeling and Kalimpong are
mated that mulberry crop worth Rs. 135 crores being infested by root mealybug, Paraputo sp.
was lost due the papaya mealybug infestation in (Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera) causing consider-
T.N. According to Qadri et al. (2011), more than able damage. It is considered as most persistent
33,000 adults of A. papayae were released (from and noxious pest (Biswas et al. 2002; Das et al.
Nov 2010 to March 2011) in the papaya mealybug 2004; Mukhopadhyay et al. 2010). It occurs
infested mulberry gardens of 350 farmers in the throughout the year with a peak during July-
districts of Erode, Tiruppur and Salem. After the August, and the population decreases with fall in
release of the parasitoids, the mealybug infestation temperature during winter months (Biswas et al.
was reduced from 90 % to less than 5 % thereby 2002; Anonymous 2011). It is a noxious pest
achieving a suppression of 8595 %. Similar con- which remains in the root zone as well as adja-
trol was achieved with the parasitoid in Trichy and cent to stump portion below the soil surface up to
in Coimbatore districts in Tamil Nadu. 20 cm or 3 deep and causes damage to root sys-
tem by sucking the sap (Biswas et al. 2002;
Karnataka A total of 15,000 adults of A. papa- Mukhopadhyay et al. 2010; Anonymous 2011).
yae were released (from Nov 2010 to Jan 2011) The affected mulberry becomes yellow and
in papaya mealybug infested mulberry gardens of stunted in growth (Misra et al. 1996).
150 farmers covering about 300 acres mulberry The mealybug causes appreciable damage to
in Chamarajanagar district. Further, a total of mulberry directly by sucking the sap and indi-
20,000 parasitoids were released in Mysore dis- rectly by making way for some fungal infection,
trict covering about 400 acres under seven leading to rotting of the root and ultimately death
Technical Service Centres (from Feb 2011 to of the plants. The infested mulberry plants show
May 2011). After the release of the parasitoids, vulnerability to the attack of various fungal
9095 % suppression in papaya mealybug infes- pathogens such as Fusarium solani, Phomopsis
63 Mulberry 585

convexifrons Mues., plus native predators, mainly


Leucopis ocellaris Mall. and Chrysopa spp. The
population density of P. comstocki was reduced
by a maximum of 68 % in East Porterville from
1972 to 1976, 71 % in Central Porterville and 73
% in West Porterville from 1974 to 1976 as a
result of the newly established natural enemy
complex. Allotropa convexifrons, the last to be
established, was now the dominant parasite
(Meyerdirk et al. 1981). In Odessa region of the
Crimea (USSR), the mealybug Pseudococcus
Root mealybug damage to mulberry comstocki was reduced 76.896.8 % with the
release of the exotic parasitoid Pseudaphycus sp.
(Romanchenko and Belskaya 1981).
mori and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Due to
this, decaying of bark portion of root and stem
occurs with severe anthracnose disease. Finally, 63.6 Ferrisia virgata (Ckll)
it results in the death of such severely affected
mulberry plants (Biswas et al. 2002). Ferrisia virgata (striped mealybug) appeared in
Highest density of this perennial pest is severe form on Morus alba at Giza region, Egypt
observed at 7.515 cm depth on the underground during 20042005. Scymnus syriacus Mars. was
stem and root region of mulberry during June released for the control of the striped mealybug, F.
September. The population diminishes with the virgata (Ckll) attacking M. alba. Percentage of
fall in atmospheric temperature and humidity. reduction among the nymphs and adults of F. virgata,
Nymphal population is double vis--vis the 30 days after releasing of the predator reached 94.08
adults (females) from March to August, and and 68.99 %, respectively, and 99.76 % after 100
remains at par with adults during autumn and days for nymphs and 92.27 % for adults (Attia 2006).
winter. The steadiness of the pest population
(infestation) pattern suggests that the microcli-
mate at 7.515 cm depth of the soil, i.e. at root References
stem transition zone was to the best of liking and
most congenial for this persistent pest of mul- Ali R, Ahmed SU (1990) A preliminary report on the
mealybug (Maconellicoccus sp.) and tukra disease of
berry (Das et al. 2004).
mulberry. Bangladesh J Zool 18(1):123124
Citronella oil (5 %) performed better towards Anonymous (2010a) Handbook of sericulture technolo-
controlling root mealybug followed by 5 % neem gies, 4th Rev edn, (Eds.) Dandin SB, Giridhar,
oil and 5 % neem leaf extract, without any K., Central Silk Board, Bangalore, 427 p
Anonymous (2010b) Annual report for 200910, Central
adverse effect on silkworm rearing (Anonymous
Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysore,
2011). Biswas et al. (2002) reported that carbofu- p 53
ran (3 % a.i.) and endosulfan (0.2 % a.i.) were Anonymous (2011) Directory of concluded projects
effective in controlling root mealybug for longer (19432010). Central Sericultural Research and
Training Institute, Berhampore, 226p
period.
Attia AR (2006) Biological control of the striped mealy-
bug, Ferrisia virgata (Ckll.) (Hemiptera:
Pseudococcidae) on the mulberry tree, Morus alba
63.5 Pseudococcus comstocki using the coccinellid predator, Scymnus syriacus.
Mars. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 16(1/2):4550
Babu RS, Dorcus D, Vivekananda M (1994) Changes in
In California, the imported natural enemy com- morpho-physiology, water relations and nutrients in
plex consisted of three parasitoids, Pseudaphycus tukra diseased leaves of a few mulberry varieties.
malinus Gah. and Allotropa burrelli Mues. and A. J Seric Sci Jpn 63(3):183188
586 J.B.N. Kumar et al.

Bartlett BR, Clancy DW (1972) The Comstock mealybug Garland JA (1998) Pest risk assessment of the pink mealy-
in California and observations on some of its natural bug Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green), with particular
enemies. J Econ Entomol 65(5):13291332 reference to Canadian greenhouses. PRA 9621.
Baskaran P, Ramanujam K, Muralikumaran C, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa
Radhakrishnan NV (1994) Incidence and severity of Hall WJ (1926) The hibiscus mealybug (Phenacoccus hir-
mealy bug associated with Mulberry leaf curl (Tukra) sutus Green) in Egypt in 1925 with notes on the intro-
in Tamil Nadu. Indian J Plant Protect 22(2):145147 duction of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. Technical
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy- and Scientic Service, Bulletin No. 70, Ministry of
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Agriculture, Egypt, pp 115
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph- Hemalatha, Shree MP (2008) Analysis of the trend of
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic infestation by sap suckers in mulberry crop system.
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p Ind J Seric 47(1):130132
Biswas S, Das D, Chattopadhyay S, Das SK, Mondal K Jayaraj S (2006) Integrated nutrient and pest management
(2002) Root mealybug (Paraputo sp.) of mulberry in for sustainable sericulture. In: Abstract in National
Darjeeling hills: Its severity, Biology and Control. Seminar on soil health and water management for sus-
Sericologia 42(1):3948 tainable sericulture. Regional Sericultural Research
Castle SJ, Prabhaker N (2011) Field evaluation of two Station, Central Silk Board, Kodathi, Bangalore, 27th
systemic neonicotinoid insecticides against pink hibis- & 28th Sept. 2006, pp 6785
cus mealybug (Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green)) on Kanchaveli L, Partsvaniya M (2009) Lesser mulberry
mulberry trees. J Pest Sci 84(3):363371 pyralid a new mulberry pest in Georgia. [Russian].
Chellappan M, Lince L, Indhu P, Cherian T, Anitha S, Zashchita i Karantin Rastenii 1:3637
Jimcymaria T (2013) Host range and distribution pat- Kasi Reddy B, Venugopal A, Jayaraj S (2004) Studies on
tern of papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus pest-predator relationship in mulberry based inter-
Williams and Granara de Willink cropping system under integrated nutrient manage-
(Hemiptera:Pseudococcidae) on selected ment practices. In: Govindan R, Naika R, Sannappa B
Euphorbiaceae hosts in Kerala. J Trop Agric (eds) Progress of Research on Disease and Pest
51(12):5159 Management in Sericulture. Seri Publishers,
Das D, Biswas S, Sarkar S, Das SK, Chakrabarti (2004) Bangalore, pp 7881
Population dynamics of the root mealybug, Paraputo Kawakami K, Yanagawa H (2003) Illustrated working
sp. on mulberry in the hills of Darjeeling. Sericologia process of new mulberry cultivation technology.
44(1):95100 Published by JICA, PEBS project Central Sericultural
de Almeida JE, Fonseca TC (2000) Mulberry germplasm Research & Training Institute, Central Silk Board,
and cultivation in Brazil. In: FAO electronic confer- Mysore, p 65
ence on Mulberry for Animal Productionorganised Krishnakumar R, Rajan VP (2009) Record of papaya
from 1st May to 31st June 2000 by Feed Resource mealybug infesting mulberry in Kerala. Insect Environ
Group of FAO, published by FAO, UN, 346 p. 15(3):29
Dhahira Beevi N (1989) Investigations on the mealybug, Kryachko ZF (1978) Comstocks mealybug [Russian].
M. hirsutus and its phytotoxaemia in mulberry. M.Sc. Zashchita Rastenii 10:57
(Ag.) thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Kumar P, Prasad KS, Kishore R, Katiyar RL, Ahsan MM,
Agril. College & Research Institute, Madurai, 89p Datta RK (1995) IPM approach to optimize silkworm
Dutt N, Mukerjee PK, Sengupta N (1951) Preliminary cocoon production. In: Proceedings of the interna-
observations on the incidence of Phenacoccus hirsutus tional conference Series, pp 252257
green and its effect on the growth of Hibiscus sabdar- Lavanya Latha K, Harihara Raju A, Jayaraj S (2004)
iffa. Ind J Agric Sci 21:231237 Studies on the effect of fertilizer doses and irrigation
El-Haidari HS, Aziz FI, Wahab WA (1978) Activity of schedules for the control of tukra mealybug in mul-
predators and parasites of the mealybug, Nipaecoccus berry. In: Govindan R, Naika R, Sannappa B (eds)
vastator (Maskell) in Iraq. [Arabic]. Yearbook of Plant Progress of Research on Disease and Pest Management
Protection Research, Iraq Ministry of Agriculture and in Sericulture. Seri Publishers, Bangalore, pp 7173
Agrarian Reform. 1974/1976, 1:4146 Mahalingam CA, Suresh S, Subramanian S, Murugesh
Fallahzadeh M, Hesami S, Moghaddam M (2002) The KA, Mohanraj P, Shanmugam R (2010) Paracoccus
rst record of Coccophagus pseudococci (Hym.: marginatus, A new pest on mulberry, Morus spp.
Aphelinidae) parasitoid of mealybugs (Hom.: Karnataka J Agric Sci 23(1):182183
Pseudococcidae) in Iran. (In English; Summary In Manjunath D, Katiyar RL (1995) Demonstration of IPM
Persian). J Entomol Soc Iran 22(1):8182 against tukra in mulberry. Annual report. Central
Ganesan K (1994) Screening of mulberry varieties for Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysore,
resistance to mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus. p 75
M.Sc. (Seri.) thesis, Tamil Nadu Agril. Univ., Manjunath D, Kishore R, Sathya Prasad K, Kumar V,
Coimbatore, 80p Kumar P, Datta RK (1996) Biology of the mealybug,
63 Mulberry 587

Maconellicoccus hirsutus, causing tukra in mulberry. Qadri SMH, Shekhar MA, Vinod Kumar, Narendra Kumar
Sericologia 36(3):487491 JB (2011) An impact and constraint analysis on the
Manjunath D, Prasad KS, Katiyar RL, Rajadurai S, establishment of Acerophagus papayae for the man-
Shekhar MA, Sen AK, Datta RK (2000) Integrated agement of papaya mealybug in mulberry ecosystem.
Pest Management in Sericulture. In: National confer- Presented at National Symposium on Harnessing
ence strategy service research development, 1618 Biodiversity for Biological Control of Crop Pests,
Nov 2000. Central Sericultural Research and Training 2526th May 2011, National Bureau of Agriculturally
Institute, Mysore, p 65 Important Insects, Bangalore (Abs. No.I-P- 38)
Manjunath D, Sathya Prasad K, Sidde Gowda DK (2003) Raichoudhury DP (1958) A short note on the study of
Ecological approaches for the management of mealy- tukra disease of mulberry caused by Phenacoccus hir-
bug, Maconellicoccu hirsutus attacking mulberry. sutus Green. J Silkworm 4:315319
National conference on Tropical sericulture for global Rajadurai S (2005a) Ladybird beetle a potential bio-
competitiveness. Central Sericultural Research & control agent for mulberry mealybug. Indian Silk
Training Institute, Mysore, p 41 44(5):57
Meyerdirk DE, Newell IM, Warkentin RW (1981) Rajadurai S (2005b) Mulberry pest management. In:
Biological control of Comstock mealybug. J Econ Govindaiah, Gupta VP, Sharma DD, Rajadurai S,
Entomol 74(1):7984 Nishita Naik V (eds). A text book on Mulberry Crop
Misra CS (1919) Tukra disease of mulberry. In: Protection. Central Silk Board Publication,
Proceedings of 3rd Ent Mtg, Pusa, pp 610618 pp 277459
Misra AK, Das BK, Ahsan MM (1996) New record of Rajadurai S, Thyagarajan V (2003) Mulberry sap sucking
Paraputo sp., as a pest of mulberry. Sericologia pests. Indian Silk 42(4):58
36(2):369371 Rangaswamy G, Narasimhanna MN, Kasiviswanathan K,
Mukhopadhyay SK, Das D, Santha Kumar MV, Das NK, Sastry CR, Jolly MS (1976) Sericulture manual 1.
Mondal K, Bajpai AK (2010) Weather based fore- Mulberry cultivation. FAO agriculture services bulle-
warning of root mealybug, Paraputo sp. in mulberry of tin. FAO., Italy, pp 6882
Kalimpong hills. J Plant Protect Sci 2(2):8587 Ravikumar J, Samuthiravelu P, Qadri SMH,
Mundo FB (1984) Survey and identication of insects Hemanthkumar L, Jayaraj S (2010) IPM module for
associated with mulberry, Morus alba L. in Philippines. tukra mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (green) and
Central Luzon State Univ Sci J 5(2):35 leaf roller, Diaphania pulverulentalis (Hamp.) in mul-
Muniappan R, Meyerdirk DE, Sengebau FM, Berringer berry. J Biopesticides 3(1 Spl. Issue):354357
DD, Reddy GVP (2006) Classical biological control Roltsch WJ, Meyerdirk DE, Warkentin R, Andress ER,
of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Carrera K (2006) Classical biological control of the
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the Republic of pink hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus
Palau. Florida Entomol 89:212217 (Green) in southern California. Biol Control
Narendra Kumar JB, Veeraiah TM, Jayaraj S (2006) Tukra 37(2):155166
mealybug (Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green) of mul- Romanchenko AA, Belskaya NM (1981) The Comstock
berry Tackling through eco- friendly strategies for mealybug in the Odessa region. [Russian]. Zashchita
sustainable sericulture. In: Abstract in National Rastenii 4:41
Seminar on soil health and water management for sus- Sahito HA, Soomro RB, Talpur MA, Memon SA, Dhiloo
tainable sericulture. Regional Sericultural Research KH (2012) Biology of mulberry mealybug,
Station, Kodathi, Bangalore, 27th & 28th Sept 2006, Maconellicoccus Hirsutus (Green) in laboratory con-
p 127 ditions. Basic Res J Agric Sci Rev 1(1):1118
Nighat Mehmood (2004) Pests of mulberry in Kashmir Sakthivel N, Gopalsamy S, Balakrishna R, Qadri SMH
valley and their management. In: Govindan R, Naika, (2011) Long tailed mealybug, Pseudococcus longispi-
R., Sannappa B (eds) Progress of Research on Disease nus- A new threat to mulberry. Indian Silk 50:89
and Pest Management in Sericulture. Seri Publishers, Sakthivel N, Kirsur MV, Balakrishna R (2010) Predatory
Bangalore, pp 7881 fauna of papaya mealybug Paracoccus marginatus
Oganesyan SB, Babayan GA (1979) The inuence of air Williams and Granara de Willink on mulberry in Tamil
temperature and humidity on the survival of eggs and Nadu. Insect Environ 16(3):117118
duration of embryonic development of the Comstock Samuthiravelu P, Ravikumar J, Hemantkumar L, Suresh
mealybug. [Russian]. Ekologiya 4:98100 A, Jayaraj S, Qadri SMH, Vijayakumar R (2005)
Philip T, Mary Josepha AV, Soudaminy PV (2002) Insect Effect of green manuring on soil health, pest and natu-
pests of mulberry in Kerala. Indian Silk 40(9):2123 ral enemy diversity in mulberry cropping system. In
Prasad GV, Arumugam V, Mogili T, Raju CS, Qadri SMH abstracts of National Symposium on Biodiversity and
(2012) The rst case of papaya mealybug infestation insect pest management, held at Loyola College,
in the mulberry gardens of Andhra Pradesh: A report Chennai, Tamil Nadu on February 34, 2005, p 25
on the extension strategies and control methods Snchez MD (2000) World distribution and utilization
adopted to check the menace. J Exp Zool of mulberry, potential for animal feeding. In: FAO
15(2):545549
588 J.B.N. Kumar et al.

electronic conference on Mulberry for Animal infesting mulberry in Karnataka. Insect Environ
Production Published by FAO, Rome, 346 p. 16(4):170172
Santha Kumar MV, Chakraborty N, Aswani Kumar C, Shylesha AN, Joshi S, Rabindra RJ, Bhumannavar BS
Bhattacharya SS, Sahakundu AK (1995) New record (2010) Classical biological control of papaya mealy-
of a coccinellid [Scymnus nubilus] predator on the bug. Tech. Broch., National Bureau of Agriculturally
pink mealybug. Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) Important Insects, Bangalore, 4p
Sericologia 35(2):359364 Sidde Gowda DK, Vinod Kumar (1995) Development of
Sathya Prasad K, Manjunath D (1992) Monitoring the ecological methods for the management of mealybug,
incidence of pests of mulberry. Annual Report of Maconellicoccus hirsutus. Annual Report, Central
Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysore,
Mysore for 199293, p 31 p 73
Sathya Prasad K, Sujatha CR, Manjunath D, Datta RK Sriharan TP, Samson MV, Krishnaswami S (1979) Studies
(2000) Screening of popular varieties for tukra infesta- on the tukra disease of mulberry. Indian J Seric
tion. In: National conference on strategies on sericul- 18:7880
ture research and development, Central Sericultural Suresh S, Jothimani R, Sivasubramaniam P,
Research and Training Institute, Mysore, 1820 Karuppuchamy P, Samiayyapan R, Jonanthan ER
November, 2000 (2010) Invasive mealybugs of Tamil Nadu and their
Savithramma P, Dandin SB (2000) Leaf quality evaluation management. Karnataka J Agric Sci 23:69
of mulberry genotypes through chemical analysis. Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Indian J Seric 39(2):117121 Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
Shekhar MA, Qadri SMH (2009) Papaya mealybug A Kuala Lumpur/London, 896 p
new menace to Mulberry in Tamil Nadu. Indian Silk Zaman A, Qader MA, Islam S, Barman AC, Alam MS,
48(4):2223 Islam M (1996) Effects of feeding of Tukra affected
Shekhar MA, Narendra Kumar JB, Sreenivas BT, Divya mulberry leaves on economic characters of silkworm,
SH (2011) Papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Bombyx mori L. Pak J Zool 28(2):169171
Tobacco
64
M. Mani and G.N. Rao

64.1 Species noticed during the crop season when hot weather
condition prevailed and rains were delayed.
Mealybugs are found to be injurious to tobacco About 2028 mealybugs were observed on the
(Nicotiana tabacum) in India, Zimbabwe, Africa, ventral side of 45 lower leaves of 1015 %
Italy, Argentina, etc. (Table 64.1). Phenacoccous plants. Crinkling of the lower leaves and pucker-
solenopsis (Tinsley) has been reported both in the ing in young leaves was observed (photo) due to
nursery and elds in India (Rao 2009; Bhatt the damage of the pest in Andhra Pradesh (Rao
2010). Heavy infestation of P. solani has been 2009). In Gujarat, P.solenopsis has been reported
reported to be found in Zimbabwe. as the major species. At the initial stage, the
mealybugs attach themselves to the lower leaves
and suck the cell sap. The infested leaves of
64.2 Damage tobacco showed sickly appearance, dried out
before maturity, and the quality of leaf also dete-
P. solenopsis appears in early sown tobacco nurs- riorated (Bhatt 2010).
eries and multiplies in large number and causes
damage to young leaves by sucking sap from the
succulent leaves. The affected leaves show puck- 64.3 Management
ering symptoms and become brittle during the
later course of development. As many as 19 Biological Control The Australian ladybird
mealybugs were recorded in each nursery bed. In beetle Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant)
the main eld, mealybug damage was also (23 per tobacco plant) gave good control of
observed. The mealybugs were found on the ven- F. virgata in the glasshouse. The mealybug popu-
tral side of the lower leaves, and they were found lation declined from 16/cm2 to 0 after 35 days of
to suck the sap. Ants were also noticed visiting release (Gautam et al. 1988). C. montrouzieri can
the mealybugs for honeydew. This pest was also be used to control P. solenopsis on tobacco
(Rao 2009). In Gujarat, the encyrtid Aenasius
M. Mani (*) bambawalei (Hayat) was found on P.solenopsis
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, (up to 30 % parasitism). Parasitized mealybugs
Bangalore 560089, India turned reddish brown, loss of white mealy pow-
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in der from their mummied body (Bhatt 2010).
G.N. Rao
Central Tobacco Research Institute,
Rajamundry, AP, India

Springer India 2016 589


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_64
590 M. Mani and G.N. Rao

Table 64.1 List of mealybugs recorded on tobacco


Mealybug Species Country References
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) India Gautam et al. (1988); http://www.plantwise.org/
KnowledgeBank/Datasheet.aspx?dsid=23981)
Geococcus coffeae (Green) Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus solani (Ferris) Zimbabwe springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02980920
Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) India Rao (2009); Bhatt (2010)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Africa http://www.infonet-biovision.org/default/ct/94/pests
Pseudococcus notobilis (Leonardi) Italy Ben-Dov (1994)
Trionymus nicotinicola (Williams and Argentina Ben-Dov (1994)
Granar de Willink)

Chemical Since tobacco is a high-value crop, Bhatt NA, Jyani DB, Patel AD (2009) Mealybug
the leaf is used for human consumption; care is to Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley- An emerging pest of
bidi tobacco in Gujarat. In: Proceedings of national
be taken to select the chemicals for the control of symposium IPM strategies to combat emerging pests
mealybugs. Chloripyriphos 0.05 % spray gave in the current scenario of climate change, 2830 Jan
100 % control of the mealybugs in Andhra 2009. Chfcau,Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh, p 38
Pradesh (Rao 2009). On tobacco, methomyl Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
90.80 % and profenophos had signicantly Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
reduced the mealybug population of P.solenopsis ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
in Gujrat (Bhatt et al. 2009). importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
Gautam RD, Paul AVN, Srivastava KP (1988) Preliminary
studies on Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. against
the white tailed mealybug Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell)
References infesting tobacco plants. J Biol Control 82:1213
Rao GN (2009) Status paper on mealy bug on tobacco. In:
Bhatt NA (2010) Mealybug [Phenacoccus solenopsis Proceedings of interactive meeting on mealybugs and
Tinsley (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae)] a serious its management held at IIHR, Bangalore, 56th
pest of tobacco in Gujarat. Insect Environ December 2009, 146 p
16(2):9091
Jatropha
65
M. Mani

Biodiesel produced from nonfood crops like of jatropha were found infested with the mealy-
Jatropha (Jatropha curcas) is one of the most bug Rhizoecus bicirculus (McKenzie) (Ben-Dov
promising solutions for tackling the growing car- 1994). A prediction model has been developed,
bon emissions from transport. Paracoccus mar- which could act as an indicator of the severity of
ginatus (Williams and Granara de Willink) was the mealybug Paracoccus marginatus damage in
found to cause serious damage on jatropha in jatropha plantations, under tropical conditions, if
India (Regupathy, and Ayyasamy, 2009; Pretheep- no proper pest management measures had been
Kumar et al. 2013), Malaysia (Mastoi et al. employed (Pretheep-Kumar et al. 2013). The
2011), and Sri Lanka (Galanihe et al. 2010) The model for predicting the percentage of mealybug
infestation resulted in symptoms like crinkling or infestation in jatropha was of the form:
twisting of leaves and shoots, bunched and y = ax1b + cx2d, where y is the percentage of mealy-
unopened leaves, yellowing of leaves or leaf bug infestation, x1 is the mean monthly tempera-
drop, fruit drop, appearance of honeydew on ture, x2 is the mean monthly rainfall, and a, b, c,
leaves, sooty mould development, stunted d are the coefcients: a = 1.172; b = 1.951;
growth, deformation, and death of the plants in c = 3.722; d = 9.024. Standard error = 7.231;
case of severe infestation. Ferrisia virgata Correlation coefcient = 0.966. It was apparent
(Cockerell), Phenacoccus herreni (Cox and that the percentage of mealybug damage in jatro-
Williams), and Planococcus minor (Maskell) are pha decreased with increase in rainfall and vice
known to attack Jatropha sp. In California, roots versa (Pretheep-Kumar et al. 2013).

M. Mani (*)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India
e-mail: mmani1949@yahoo.co.in

Springer India 2016 591


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_65
592 M. Mani

Paracoccus marginatus damage to jatropha

Ten natural enemies, including parasitoids have to be sprayed repeatedly to achieve satisfac-
viz. Acerophagus papayae (Noyes and Schauff), tory control. The combination of parathion and
Anagyrus loecki (Noyes), Pseudleptomastix mex- malathion with white oils makes spraying more
icana (Noyes and Schauff), and predators like efcient. To manage the insects at the beginning
Spalgis epeus (Westwood), Cryptolaemus of a local outbreak, severely infested branches
montrouzieri (Mulsant), Brumoides suturalis should be cut and burnt immediately (le:///C:/
(Fabricius), Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fabricius), Documents%20and%20Settings/
Scymnus coccivora (Ayyar), Chilocorus sp., and user/y%20Documents/Downloads/Jatropha%
Chrysoperla zastrowi (Sillemi) (Esben-Petersen) 20under%20attack.pdf). The systemic acephate
were found attacking P. marginatus in India. on the plant can be used to clear up the mealy-
Among them, Acerophagus papayae was found to bugs on jatropha. Spraying is to be done twice at
be highly effective in controlling the mealybug 10-day intervals. Sprays can be scheduled in the
population in Bangalore North. early morning or evening when the temperatures
Mealybugs Ferrisia virgata and Planococcus are low. (http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2000-
sp. suck the plants sap, resulting in yellowing, 06- 23/lifestyle/0006220403_1_mealybug-
withering and drying of plants, and shedding of toads-seeds)
leaves and fruits. The foliage and fruits become
covered with large quantities of sticky honeydew,
which serves as a medium for the growth of black References
sooty moulds, resulting in the reduction of the
photosynthetic area. Some ladybird beetles, Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
including Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, Olla
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
v-nigrum, and Azya luteipes, together with syr- ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
phids such as Alloagrapta oblique, are known importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
predators of mealybugs. Chemicals such as diazi- Galanihe LD, Jayasundera MUP, Vithana A,
Asselaarachchi N, Watson GW (2010) Occurrence,
non, malathion, dimethoate, and parathion are
distribution and control of papaya mealybug,
effective in controlling F. virgata. However, they Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae),
65 Jatropha 593

an invasive alien pest in Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res Ext (Jatropha curcas L.) based on the weather parameters.
13(3):8186 Int J Agrisci 3(6):440443
Mastoi MI, Azura AN, Muhammad R, Idris AB, Ibrahim Regupathy A, Ayyasamy R (2009) Need for generating base-
Y (2011) First report of papaya mealybug Paracoccus line data for monitoring insecticide resistance in new
marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from invasive mealybug Paracoccus marginatus Williams and
Malaysia. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 5(7):12471250 Granara de Willink (Insecta: Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae),
Pretheep-Kumar P, Tilak M, Durairasu P (2013) A model the key pest of papaya and biofuel crop, Jatropha curcas.
for predicting the infestation of mealybugsin jatropha Resistant Pest Manag Newsl 19(1):3740
Forage Crops and Grasses
66
Narendra S. Kulkarni and M. Mani

Fodder crops and grasses harbour large number the infested areas, the plant stand is sparse and
of mealybugs throughout the world (Table 66.1). existing plants yield poorly and weeds often over-
Though a number of mealybugs are recorded on take these areas. The mealybugs produce white
grasses and fodder crops, only some are known to webbing and clusters of whitish eggs, so theyre
cause economic damage. often obvious in the soil. Ground mealybug is
restricted to the heavier soils. The eggs, nymphs
and adults all occur in the soil. Infestations in
66.1 Rhizoecus kondonis alfalfa elds generally occur in circular patches
and spread slowly. The damage to alfalfa plants is
The mealybug Rhizoecus kondonis Kuwana feeds very apparent in the summer months but less so
on alfalfa roots causing severe damage to alfalfa. It during the winter and spring (McKenzie 1967).
sucks out plant juices, which causes stunting and There are three generations per year. Mealybugs
yellowing of plants. The infestations generally start are abundant in July-August, December-January
in small circular areas near the eld borders and and March-April. Signicantly more R. kondonis
gradually increase in size up to an acre or so. Within were found 15.245.7 cm deep in the soil.

Rhizoecus kondonis Ground mealybug damage in foreground compared


with undamaged eld in the background

N.S. Kulkarni (*)


Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, M. Mani
Dharwad 580 005, India Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
e-mail: narendrask@yahoo.co.in Bangalore 560089, India

Springer India 2016 595


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_66
596

Table 66.1 List of mealybugs attacking the grasses and fodder crops
Mealybug species Plant species Region References
Antonina graminis (Maskell) Cyprus, Cyanodon, Many countries Ben-Dov (1994)
Echinochloa
Antonina martima Green Cyprus, Cyanodon India Williams (2004)
Sri Lanka
Antonina purpurea Signoret Grasses France, Italy & Spain Ben-Dov (1994)
Antonina graminis, A. indica Grasses Africa Williams (2001)
Hall., A. natalensis Brain &
A. transvaalensis Brain
Antonina graminis (Maskell) Bermuda grass, Brazil Culik and Gullan (2005)
Balanococcus botulus Cox Cyprus New Zealand Cox (1987)
Balanococcus poae Pasture grass New Zealand Charles et al. (2009)
(Maskell)
Balanococcus mediterraneus Cynodon Greece Kozar (1983)
Lozar
Balanococcus Cynodon Italy & Korea Ben-Dov (1994)
notodanthoniae Cox
Brevennia cyanadontis Cynodon & Sorgum Iraq Ben-Dov (1994)
(Bodennhemer)
Brevennia licus (DeLotto) Sorgum South Africa De Lotto (1967)
Brevennia rehi (Lindinger) Sorgum India David and Ananthakrishnan (2004)
Cyprus & grasses California Miller (1973)
Cynodon dactylon Australia & Papua New Williams et al. (1981)
Guinea
Chaetococcus australis Cyperus Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
(Froggatt)
Chlorozococcus sorghi Sorgum India Williams (2004)
Williams
Dysmicoccus andropogonisn Andropogon grass India Williams (2004)
sp.n.
Dysmicoccus boninsis Sorghum & Cynodon Ben-Dov (1994)
(Kuwana)
N.S. Kulkarni and M. Mani
Mealybug species Plant species Region References
Dysmicoccus brevipes Maize & Cyprus Ben-Dov (1994)
(Cockrell) & Dysmicoccus
neobrevipes Beardsley
Dysmicoccus multivorus Lucerne Turkmenia & USSR Myartseva and Kharchenko (1988)
Koteja & Zak-Ogaza
Ehrhornia cupressi (Ehrhorn) Cyprus California & Mexico Ben-Dov (1994)
Fonscolombia butorinae Grasses Russia Danzig (2007)
(Danzig et Gavrilov)
Formicoccus lingnani Sorghum Malaysia Williams (2004)
66 Forage Crops and Grasses

(Ferris)
Ferrisia virgata (Ckll.) Su-babul Leucaena India Pillai and Gopi (1990)
leucocephala
Maize & Lucerne Ben-Dov (1994)
Geococcus coffeae Green Cyperus Many countries Ben-Dov (1994)
Heliococcus singularis Cyperus India Williams (2004)
Awasthi & Shafee
Heterococcus cyperi (Hall) Cyperus Egypt Ben-Dov (1994)
Marendelleae harrisae Sorhgum Nigeria Ben-Dov (1994)
Williams Leucaena http://www.plantwise.org/KnowledgeBank/Datasheet.aspx?dsid=36335
Paradoxococcus mdaniell Sorghum Texas Ben-Dov (1994)
McKenzie
Phenacoccus angustatus Sorghum Kazakhstan Ben-Dov (1994)
Borchsenius
Phenacoccus bicerarius Sorghum Kazakhstan Ben-Dov (1994)
Borchsenius Colver Europe
Phenacoccus hordei Grasses England Malumphy (2011)
(Lindeman)
Planococcoides lindingeri Sorghum Egypt & Israel Ben-Dov (1994)
(Bodenheimer)
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Maize Ben-Dov (1994)
(continued)
597
Table 66.1 (continued)
598

Mealybug species Plant species Region References


Pseudococcus kozari sp. n. Pasture grasses (Poa Romania Savescu (1984)
pratensis & Loliu
perenne)
Pseudococcus scaaharicola Sorghum India, Pakistan Williams (2004)
Takahashi
Pseudococcus sorghiellus Sorghum & Maize California Ben-Dov (1994)
(Forbes)
Rhizoecus kondonis Kawana Lucerne California McKenzie (1967)
Rhodania porifera Goux Pastures France Ben-Dov (1994)
Sacchariococcus sacchari Sorghum Ben-Dov (1994)
(Cockrell)
Spilococcus expressus Sorghum Tadzhikistan Ben-Dov (1994)
(Borchsenius)
Stemmatomerinx spp. Grasses United States Howell and Miller (1976)
Trionymus ceres Williams Sorghum India & Pakistan Williams (2004)
Trionymus internodii (Hall) Maize Egypt & Israel Ben-Dov (1980)
Trionymus polyporus Hall Sorghum Egypt Ben-Dov (1994)
Trionymus radicola Sorghum Columbia & Jamaica Ben-Dov (1994)
(Morrison)
Trionymus townsei Beardsley Sorghum India Ben-Dov (1994)
Trionymus utahensis Sorghum California Ben-Dov (1994)
(Cockrell)
Trionymus violascens Grasses Colorado & California Ben-Dov (1994)
Cockrell
N.S. Kulkarni and M. Mani
66 Forage Crops and Grasses 599

The highest ground mealybug populations 66.3 Dysmicoccus multivorus


were generally found at intermediate soil mois-
ture conditions; however, some individuals were In Turkmenia, USSR, Dysmicoccus multivorus
found in soils as dry as 7 % moisture. Ten lucerne was observed as a potential pest of Lucerne.
varieties were examined for susceptibility to this Numbers of the mealybugs were markedly
insect and found to be equally susceptible. Crop reduced by Leptomastix ava, Anagyrus diversi-
rotation with corn, wheat, or dry beans might be cornis, Leptomastidea rubra and Ericydnus
the best rotation option for reducing populations, robustior (Myartseva and Kharchenko 1988).
perhaps coupled with a summer fallow period
(Godfrey and Pickle 1998).
66.4 Antonina graminis

66.2 Ferrisia virgata Rhodesgrass mealybug (often called Rhodesgrass


scale) A. graminis (Maskell) attacks a wide range
Infestations of F. virgata (Cockrell) remain clus- of pasture, lawn and turf grasses. It has been
tered around the terminal shoots, leaves, sucking recorded in several Asian countries, California,
the sap which results in yellowing, withering and Texas, Mexico, Australia, Philippines, Africa,
drying of plants and shedding of leaves of South and Central America. The mealybug is
lucerne. The foliage also becomes covered with unique in Pseudococcidae in that the legs are not
large quantities of sticky honeydew which serves retained throughout the life (Clausen 1978). This
as a medium for the growth of black sooty mealybug A. graminis (Maskell) is of Asiatic ori-
moulds. The sooty moulds and waxy deposits gin infesting at least 69 species of lawn and turf
result in a reduction of photosynthetic area. Such grasses (Dean et al. 1979). Bermuda grass, St.
plants are not preferred as cattle feed. Augustine grass, tall fescue, and centipede-grass
are severely injured. Mealybugs typically feed
under leaf sheaths, on nodes or in the crowns.
They feed on plant sap with piercing-sucking
mouthparts and disrupt the plant's vascular sys-
tem which will interfere with water and nutrient
uptake resulting in discoloration and wilt.
Stunting, thinning and death may result in a
heavy infestation. Masses of waxy, white secre-
tions may be noticed along with possible honey-
dew and sooty mould. These mealybugs feed
under leaf sheaths, on nodes or in the crowns.
Damage may be most noticeable during periods
of drought or if the grass is stressed. Mealybug
females deposit 300600 eggs in a cottony ovi-
sac. Eggs hatch into crawlers within 13 weeks
Lucerne infested with Ferrisia virgata and the crawlers will begin feeding under the leaf
sheath at a node. A generation may take 46
weeks depending upon temperature and location.
There can be several generations per season.
600 N.S. Kulkarni and M. Mani

Antonina graminis on Rhodesgrass Neodusmetia sangwani

Rhodesgrass mealybug was an important pest occurring at only 20 % of survey sites. In addi-
of forage and lawn grasses in Texas. Cultural tion, N. sangwani exhibited a patchy geographic
control includes collecting and destroying grass distribution. Possible causes for these results are
clippings. A classical biological control project that N. sangwani has not dispersed widely since
resulted in the introduction of several species of its introduction, or that the imported re ant,
parasitoids (Schuster et al. 1971). However, Solenopsis invicta Buren, is interfering with bio-
complete control was attained by encyrtid para- logical control. Two other encyrtid wasps
sitoid Neodusmetia sangwani (Rao), imported Acerophagus sp. and Pseudectroma sp. are utiliz-
from India after being disseminated by aircraft ing A. graminis as a host (Chantos et al. 2009.
(Schuster et al. 1971: Dahlsten and Hall 1999).
By 1976, it was estimated that the parasitoid
saved ca. 17 million dollars annually in turf grass 66.5 Dysmicoccus brevipes
management costs (Dean et al. 1979). The exotic
parasitoid Anagyrus antoninae Timb. established Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) is a polypha-
and gave good control in cooler and more humid gous mealybug; it was only found in moderate
areas of Texas, Mexico and Florida. Antonina densities on Rhodesgrass, Chloris gayana, and
graminis is resurging as an important pest of turf- wire grass, Eleusine indica, both of which were
grass across Texas and the South-eastern United found in mowed and unmowed weedy areas with
States. This mealybug is known to feed on many the former species being more common in
warm-season turf grasses and pasture grasses. Hawaii. All phenological stages of Rhodesgrass
Cultivars of kikuyugrass (Pennisetum clandesti- were infested with pink pineapple mealybugs,
num Hochst) and bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) but only mature wire grass plants were infested
were signicantly more susceptible than cultivars (Gahan) (Pandey and Johnson 2006).
of seven other genera of turfgrass. Cultivars of St.
Augustinegrass, buffalograss and zoysiagrass
each exhibited susceptibility of >2 mealybugs 66.6 Brevennia rehi
per 7.5 7.5-cm plant. Populations did not
exceed < =0.5 mealybug per plant on centipede- Many grass species are grown as lawns or used in
grass, seashore paspalum, bahiagrass, or tall fes- golf courses and other recreational settings espe-
cue (Reinert and Vinson 2010). A survey cially turf grasses are susceptible to numerous
conducted in south-eastern United States indi- species of pest insects, and annually millions of
cated that N. sangwani was uncommon overall, dollars are spent to prevent or eliminate infesta-
66 Forage Crops and Grasses 601

tions. The Tuttle mealybug, Brevennia rehi Bermuda and zoysia are important lawn grasses,
(Lindinger), is a pest of many grass species and especially in the southern United States, infesta-
occurs nearly worldwide, especially where rice tion by Tuttle mealybug should be considered
and sugarcane are grown. Ofcially recorded in whenever dieback is noticed, especially if the
the United States only from Arizona, California, grass blades show white wax or are sticky from
Florida and Texas (Ben-Dov 2012), but is proba- honeydew secretion. Both Bermuda and zoysia
bly more widespread in south-eastern states that lawns are commonly installed as sod or plugs,
produce turf grasses for the sod market. Tuttle which provide a ready route for the spread of
mealybug is known from other regions of the infestations should the pest control practices of
world (e.g., Palearctic region Afghanistan, Iraq, the grower fail to maintain a pest-free production
Iran; Ben-Dov 2012) where there is a distinct environment.
cold season, which suggests the mealybug may
be capable of surviving in much of the United
States. Tuttle mealybug was described in the 66.7 Trionymus winnemucae &
United States as Heterococcus tuttlei Miller and Saccharicoccus sacchari
its taxonomy status is now amended to junior
synonym of Brevennia rehi. Healthy turfgrass Trionymus winnemucae McKenzie (Winnemuca
will have lower mealybug populations, so proper grass mealybug) lives within the sheath, but may
fertilization and watering is needed. Keep bene- also be found below the crown at the crownsoil
cial insects in the area to reduce the number of interface. Saccharicoccus sacchari (Comstock)
mealybugs, such as big-eyed bugs and lady bee- (pink sugarcane mealybug) is also an elongated
tles. After mowing, collect and destroy all pinkish mealybug that will occasionally infest
infested grass clippings. Brevennia rehi is also ornamental grasses. Both T. winnemucae and Sa.
recorded from Israel, Iraq, Azerbaijan, and sacchari are slightly larger, with a more elongate
Tajikistan and from Brazil. The rice mealybug is body form.
recorded from Israel as a pest to lawn grasses,
Dactyloctenium australe (Poaceae) (Ben-Dov
2008). Mealybugs hide between the grass blade 66.8 Balanococcus poae
and the stem where they can be difcult to see.
They are destructive infestations in South Asia The pasture mealybug Balanococcus poae
(e.g., India, Bangladesh). There was a correlation (Maskell) can be a serious pasture pest in
between drought stress and degree of infestation, Canterbury areas, and is known to occur in
possibly due to an increase in the availability of Manawatu and Nelson region of New Zealand.
amino acids in the vascular uid (Dale 1994). It Adult mealybugs are small, growing to about
was discovered infesting bermudagrass (Cynodon 2 mm in size, pink in colour. There are white,
dactylon) seed production crops in Arizona to waxy secretions in the plant crown and upper
such an extent that the sticky exudates produced roots. These will appear as cotton-woollike glob-
by the mealybugs fouled the harvesting equip- ules. Damage becomes apparent in autumn during
ment (Miller and McKenzie 1970). Tuttle mealy- extended dry periods. Symptoms of infestation
bug is a recorded host of the parasitoids Rhopus resemble those of drought, with pastures brown-
nigroclavatus Ashmead and Apoleptomastix ing off. The mealybug damage tends to affect a
bicoloricornis Girault (Hymenoptera: whole paddock, rather than isolated patches. It
Encyrtidae) (Noyes 1988). Rhopus nigroclavatus causes widespread ryegrass death, leading to poor
does not occur in Florida, but is recorded from pasture persistence. At Hawke's Bay, adult
several other states, and A. bicoloricornis is not females of Balanococcus poae were found
recorded from the United States. Because throughout the year, typically in wax cells ca.
602 N.S. Kulkarni and M. Mani

12 cm below the soil surface, with a peak density The timing of life-stages indicates that there was a
of ca. 1,300/m2 during winter and early spring single generation each year, but a partial second
(June-October). Winter eggs were followed by generation may also have occurred in late sum-
neonate nymphs from spring through summer. mer. No males were found (Charles et al. 2009).

Brevennia rehi on a stem of zoysia grass Pasture mealybug

Pasture mealybug (Balanococcus poae) was high number on any individual plant and the
found infesting native grasses, tussocks in symptoms of infestation on the surface become
Poaceae and several introduced pastoral grass easily visible. Usually, the mealybug is capable
species particularly ryegrass (Lolium spp.) in of growing to a maximum length of 4 mm (3/16
Canterbury, New Zealand. Pasture mealybug are in.) and it thrives in the narrow gap between stem
capable of inicting severe damage to endophyte- and the enfolding leaf sheath. Initially, this pest
free ryegrass (Pennell et al. 2005). The use of generally forms colonies near the base of the
pure stands of endophyte-infected grasses or a plant and gradually ascends upward with the
mixed stand of infected and non-infected plants amplication of their population. In general, the
may increase the persistence and durability of initial surface symptoms of a plant being infested
turf and forage grass species in the presence of by Miscanthus mealybug include slowing down
foliar damaging mealybugs (Sabzalian et al. of the plant's growth and an abnormal entwining
2004). of the owering head. In addition, the colour of
the sheath tissue as well as the stem becomes
deep red in parts where the mealy bugs are draw-
66.9 Miscanthicoccus miscanthi ing their food from the plant, particularly in the
later part of the growing season. Even when a
Miscanthus is a genus of about 15 species of plant is severely plagued, it is not eliminated, but
perennial grasses native to subtropical and tropi- is decreased to ugly, distorted masses as the white
cal regions of Africa and southern Asia. The dis- powdery wax swathes its stems, particularly in
persal of the Miscanthus mealybug, the lower parts. Plants that are infested by this
Miscanthicoccus miscanthi (Takahashi), has bug usually become incapable of owering in any
actually been unsuspectingly rapid, by means of way. In some cases, the owering stalks may pos-
selling as well as exchanging the plants infested sibly be underdeveloped resulting in the owers
with this insect. It only becomes conspicuous to open droopingly among the foliage, instead of
when the population of this bug reaches a very blossoming elegantly above.
66 Forage Crops and Grasses 603

66.10 Geococcus coffeae sap. Hawthorn mealybugs also produce a lot of


and Rhizoecus hibisci honeydew, a sugary waste material as a result of
feeding on the sap. Honeydew is shiny, clear or
Geococcus coffeae and Rhizoecus hibisci Kawai whitish in appearance and sticky. Honeydew can
& Takagi are the root mealybugs infest grasses, also lead to sooty mould, a black fungus that col-
cyperus etc. Mealybugs secrete lots of white onizes the honeydew. Hawthorn mealybug has
waxy material that cover their bodies. Because the potential to weaken branches and cause die-
the root mealybug is very difcult to control, back, although that has not been noticed on
efforts should be made to prevent spread and infested trees here so far. Hawthorn mealybugs
establishment: inspect roots of newly purchased
plants; do not allow water from infested areas to
drain in to clean areas, as crawlers can be trans-
ported in water; hot water dips alone or with
insecticides work as insecticides such as Dursban
WP and Marathon G.; watering plants prior to
drench application will signicantly reduce prob-
lems with phytotoxicity.

66.11 Phenacoccus hordei

It is a root-feeding species that occurs throughout


Europe, and is oligophagous on Poaceae, and
occasionally plants in other families. Its hosts Hawthorn mealybug, Phenacoccus dearnessi
include several important crops, such as alfalfa
(Malumphy 2011).
appear to have one generation per year. They
mature in the late spring. Eggs hatch and nymphs
66.12 Antonina pretiosa are active by early summer. After feeding on
leaves briey, the nymphs move to twigs and feed
Antonina pretiosa Signoret is known to infest the in protected sites. Because of the white waxy
arundinaria, mocker grass. They tend to cluster in material that is present and the habit of the
masses on protected parts of the bamboo and nymphs to feed in protected places, direct insec-
move slowly, if at all. Adult females lay yellow ticide control can be challenging. However, if
eggs in a mass with white wax. Nymphs are management is necessary, an application of a sys-
white, yellowish or reddish and oblong, and sev- temic insecticide, like imidacloprid and dinotefu-
eral generations of mealybugs can occur each ran should be effective.
year. Antonina purpurea is known to occur on the
roots of the grasses (Ben-Dov 1994).
66.14 Tridiscus sporoboli
and Trionymus sp.
66.13 Phenacoccus dearnessi
Two grass-feeding mealybugs, Tridiscus spo-
Phenacoccus dearnessi Whitney has been found roboli (Cockerell) and Trionymus sp., were found
infesting several hawthorns in Minneapolis and heavily damaging buffalograss (Buchloe dacty-
northeast Illinois (Hann 2012). This insect colo- loides) stands near Mead, Nebraska. They were
nizes the bark of twigs and small branches using most commonly found feeding within leaf
its piercing sucking mouthparts to feed on the sheaths just below the collar or behind leaf axils
604 N.S. Kulkarni and M. Mani

enclosing the pistillate spikelets. Injury appeared pronounced that the species is supposed to be
as foliar yellowing with the most severely injured extinct locally (Brinon et al. 2004).
plants turning straw-brown and dying (Baxendale
et al. 1994). Pubescent leaves increase buffalo-
grass susceptibility to mealybugs Tridiscus spo- 66.18 Sorghum
roboli and Trionymus sp. (Johnson-Cicalese et al.
1998, 2011). Parasitism on these mealybugs by Pink sugarcane mealybug Saccharicoccus sac-
Rhopus nigroclavatus in Nebraska went up to chari (Cockerell) sucks the sap and reduces cane
78.5 % indicating its potential in the population vigour, besides causing sooty mould. The mealy-
regulation of these mealybugs (Heng-Moss et al. bugs are usually attended by ants. Severe attack
1999). results in stunted growth, yellowing of leaves,
deposition of sticky honeydew, and development
of sooty mould on the mealybug infested plants.
66.15 Pseudococcus saccharicola
Takahashi
66.19 Maize
It was found infesting Chloris barbata Sw. (swol-
len ngergrass), C. radiata (L.) (radiate nger- Infestations of Ferrisia viragata remain clustered
grass) and Cynodon dactylon L. (bermudagrass) around the terminal shoots and leaves, sucking
in Guana Island, and nearby Beef Island and the sap which results in yellowing, withering and
Tortola, in the British Virgin Islands (BVI). The drying of plants and shedding of leaves. The
coccinellid predator Hyperaspis scutifera sooty moulds and waxy deposits result in a reduc-
(Mulsant) was commonly witnessed with colo- tion of photosynthetic area.
nies of P. saccharicola on all three islands
(Wheeler et al. 2010).
66.20 Forage Trees

66.16 Dysmicoccus dennoi & Gliricidia, Gliricidia sepium and subabul


Trionymus clandestinus Leucaena leucocephala, multipurpose fodder
trees are frequently attacked by the striped mealy-
The coccinellid predator Hyperaspidius venustu- bug Ferrisia virgata. A severe outbreak of
lus (Mulsant) was reported on Dysmicoccus den- Ferrisia virgata was found in a 25-ha plantation
noi Kosztarab from South Carolina on big of Leucaena leucocephala in Tamil Nadu, India
cordgrass (Spartina cynosuroides), in or near in May 1988. The coccinellid predator Scymnus
brackish marshes and along tidal waterways and coccivora Ayyar (Coleoptera) and the encyrtid
on the mealybug Trionymus clandestinus parasitoid Aenasius advena (Hymenoptera) were
McConnell infesting beardgrass, Andropogon the biological control agents in the eld (Pillai
tenuispatheus. and Gopi 1990).

66.17 Heliococcus summervillei 66.21 General Management


Practices
It was a very severe pest on grasses in pastures in
New Caledonia. In Australia, similar populations Its important to always monitor the forage crops,
of H. summervillei Brookes were observed on pasture or turf grasses for the presence of mealy-
Paspalum grass in a pasture. Like in Australia, a bugs and their damaging symptoms before initi-
natural reduction of populations was observed, so ating any management options. Yellow sticky
66 Forage Crops and Grasses 605

cards can be used to trap the ying adult males, duced in New Caledonia, Heliococcus summervillei
Brookes (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae). [French]. Bull
preventing them from mating. Insecticidal soaps
Soc Entomol France 109(4):425428
and horticultural oils work great in controlling Chantos JM, Vinson SB, Helms KR (2009) Distribution
the mealybugs. The tricky part is mealybugs tend and abundance of parasites of the rhodesgrass mealy-
to hide very well where leaves attach to the stem, bug, Antonina graminis: reassessment of a classic
example of biological control in the southeastern
so make sure you get coverage there. Horticultural
United States. J Insect Sci (Madison) 9:48
soaps and oils dont have systemic properties, Charles JG, Chhagan A, Forgie SA, Slay MWA, Edwards
which means when spraying, the product must RD (2009) Observations on the biology of the pasture
come in contact with the pest. Burn leaves with mealybug, Balanococcus poae, from Hawke's Bay
pastures. NZ Plant Protect 62:197204
horticultural soaps and oils. These products need
Clausen CP (1978) Introduced parasites and predators of
to be applied when the air temperature is cool. arthropod pests and weeds: a world review. USDA
Make sure your plants were watered well the day ARS Agric. Hand Book, University of Illinois No
before applying any control measures. Following 480545 p
Cox JM (1987) Pseudococcidae (Insecta: Hemiptera).
labelled rates also reduces the risk of leaf dam-
Fauna NZ 11:1228
age. More is not better. Also, make sure bene- Culik MP, Gullan PJ (2005) A new pest of tomato and
cial insects are not affected while spraying other records of mealybugs (Hemiptera:
insecticides. There are a few benecial insects Pseudococcidae) from Espirito Santo, Brazil
(Summary In Portuguese). Zootaxa 964:18
that can help in mealybug treatment, too. Green
Dahlsten DL, Hall RW (1999) Biological control of
lacewings feed on the crawler stage of almost any insects in outdoor urban environments. In: Bellows
mealybug, where some others are more special- TS, Fisher TW (eds) Handbook of Biological Control:
ized like the mealybug destroyer (Cryptolaemus Principles and Applications. Academic Press, San
Diego/New York, 1046 p
montrouzieri). This benecial insect is a type of
Dale D (1994) Insect pests of the rice plant-their biology
ladybug that loves to feed on most mealybug spe- and ecology. In: Heinrichs EA (ed) Biology and man-
cies. Mealybugs can be controlled if the timing of agement of rice insects. Wiley Eastern Limited, New
the initiation of the treatment is planned correctly Age International Limited, Bangalore, pp 363486
Danzig M (2007) Mealybugs of the genus Fonscolombia
at the crawler stage.
Licht. (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae) of the fauna of
Russia and neighbouring countries [Russian]. Entomol
Obozrenie 86(2):363377
References David BV, Ananthakrishnan TN (2004) General and
applied entomology. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing,
New Delhi, 1184p
Baxendale FP, Johnson-Cicalese JM, Riordan TP (1994)
De Lotto G (1967) The mealybugs of South Africa(Homo
Tridiscus sporoboli and Trionymus sp. (Homoptera:
ptera:Pseudococcidae)-1.Entomolgy Memoirs. Rep
Pseudococcidae): potential new mealybug pests of
South Afr Dep Agric Tech Ser 12:128
buffalograss turf. J Kansas Entomol Soc
Dean HA, Schuster MF, Boling JC, Riherd PT (1979)
67(2):169172
Complete biological control of Antoninagraminis in
Ben-Dov Y (1980) Observations on scale insects
Texas with Neodusmetia sangwani (a classic exam-
(Homoptera:Coccoidea) of the Middle. East Bull Ent
ple). Bull Ent Soc Am 25:262267
Res 70:261271
Godfrey LD, Pickle C (1998) Seasonal dynamics and
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
management schemes for a subterranean mealybug,
bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
Rhizoecus kondonis Kuwana, pest of alfalfa. Southwest
Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
Entomol 23(4):343350
ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
Hann J (2012) Hawthorn Mealybug: An Interesting Insect
importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
in the Landscape. University of Minnesota Website,
Ben-Dov Y (2008) The rice mealybug, Brevennia rehi
Minneapolis
(Lindinger, 1943): new synonyms, and new distribu-
Heng-Moss TM, Baxendale FP, Riordan TP, Young LJ
tion records (Hemiptera, Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae).
(1999) Inuence of Rhopus nigroclavatus
Bull Soc Entomol France 113(1):8588
(Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on the mealybugs
Ben-Dov Y (2012) ScaleNet. World Wide Web electronic
Tridiscus sporoboli and Trionymus sp. (Homoptera:
publication (5 September 2012)
Pseudococcidae). Environ Entomol 28(1):123127
Brinon L, Matile-Ferrero D, Chazeau J (2004) Outbreak
Howell JO, Miller DR (1976) A taxonomic study of the
and regression of a grass infesting mealybug, intro-
mealybug genus Stemmatomerinx (Homoptera:
606 N.S. Kulkarni and M. Mani

Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae. Ann Entomol Soc Am Pillai SRM, Gopi KC (1990) Epidemic outbreak of mealy-
69(2):345361 bug Ferrisiana virgata (Cockerell) (Pseudococcidae:
Johnson-Cicalese J, Baxendale F, Riordan T, Heng-Moss Homoptera) in su-babul (Leucaena leucocephala
T (1998) Identication of mealybug- (Homoptera: (Lam.) de Wit) plantations. Indian Forester
Pseudococcidae) resistant turf-type buffalograss 116(10):822824
germplasm. J Econ Entomol 91(1):340346 Reinert JA, Vinson SB (2010) Preference among turfgrass
Johnson-Cicalese J, Baxendale F, Riordan T, Heng-Moss genera and cultivars for colonization by Rhodesgrass
T, Baird L (2011) Evaluation of buffalograss leaf mealybug, Antonina graminis (Hemiptera:
pubescence and its effect on resistance to mealybugs Pseudococcidae). Southwest Entomol 35(2):121128
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). J Kansas Entomol Soc Sabzalian MR, Hatami B, Mirlohi A (2004) Mealybug,
84(1):7177 Phenococcus solani, and barley aphid, Sipha maydis,
Kozar F (1983) New and little known scale response to endophyte-infected tall and meadow fes-
insects(Homoptea:Coccoidea). Acta Zool Acad Sci cues. Entomol Exp et Appl 113(3):205209
Hung 29:139149 Savescu A (1984) Species of Coccoidea new to science
Malumphy C (2011) Barley mealybug Phenacoccus hor- reported in Romania. II. Species belonging to the gen-
dei (Lindeman) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), new to era Pseudococcus Westw. Phenacoccus Ckll. and
Britain, with an updated key to native Phenacoccus Peliococcus Borchs. (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae)
species. Entomol Gazette 62(3):165171 [French]. Bull Acad Sci Agric For 13:143156
McKenzie HL (1967) Mealybugs of California. University Schuster MF, Boling JC, Marony JJ Jr (1971) Biological
of California Press, Berkeley, 526 p control of rhodesgrass scale by airplane releases of an
Miller DR (1973) Brevennia rehi (Lindinger) a potential introduced parasite of limited dispersing activity. In:
pest of rice in the U.S.(Hompotera; Coccoidea: Huffaker CB (ed) Biological Control. Plenum Press,
Pseudococcidae). Proc Entomol Soc Wash 75:372 New York, pp 227250, 511 p
Miller DR, McKenzie HL (1970) Review of the genus Wheeler AG Jr, Evans GA, Vandenberg NJ (2010)
Heterococcus (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcus saccharicola Takahashi (Hemiptera:
Pseudococcidae) with a description of a new species. Pseudococcidae) in the British Virgin Islands: First
Ann Entomol Soc Am 63:438453 Western Hemisphere Records, with records of a co-
Myartseva SN, Kharchenko GA (1988) Parasitoid com- occurring lady beetle, Hyperaspis scutifera (Mulsant)
plex of the polyphagous mealybug. [Russian]. Izv (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Proc Entomol Soc Wash
Akad Nauk Turkm SSR Ser Biol Nauk 1:3743 112(4):565575
Noyes JS (1988) Encyrtidae, Fauna of New Zealand Williams DJ (2001) African species of the mealybug
Number 13. DSIR, Wellington, 188 p genus Antonina Signoret (Hemiptera: Coccoidea:
Pandey RR, Johnson MW (2006) Weeds adjacent to Pseudococcidae). J Nat Hist 35(6):833848
Hawaiian pineapple plantings harboring pink pineap- Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
ple mealybugs. Environ Entomol 35(1):6874 Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD,
Pennell CGL, Popay AJ, Ball OJP, Hume DE, Baird DB London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
(2005) Occurrence and impact of pasture mealybug Williams DJ, Radunz LAJ, Brookes HM (1981) The rice
(Balanococcus poae) and root aphid (Aploneura len- mealybug Brevennia rehi (Lindinger) now recorded
tisci) on ryegrass (Lolium spp.) with and without from Australia and Papua New Guinea (Hemiptera:
infection by Neotyphodium fungal endophytes. N Z Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae). J Aust Entomol Soc
J Agric Res 48(3):329337 20(1):46
Forest Plants
67
R. Sundararaj and M. Mani

Mealybugs often cause serious damage to the highly polyphagous and have many collateral
growth of forest tree species particularly in nurs- hosts and hence, they can spread very rapidly to
eries and plantations. The damage is caused by the neighbouring plants.
sap sucking resulting in dieback symptoms and
secreting copious amount of honeydew on which
black sooty mould fungus develops. Often the 67.1 Ferrisia virgata
infestation results in drying of branches causing
dieback of branches and ultimately death in seed- The striped mealybug Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell)
lings and trees. The affected owers wither and is covered with powdery white wax and has a pair
fruits dry up, fall off prematurely. The seedlings of purplish dorsal stripes along the back. It is
and trees affected severely by mealybugs shed reported to breed on leaves, stem and fruits of
their leaves and look like sickly appearance and large number of tree plants including Azadirachta,
in some cases drying of branches in trees and Anacardium, Annona, Artocarpus, Caesalpinia,
death of seedlings. Most of the mealybugs are Casuarina, Cassia, etc. in India (Ali 1970). On a

Ferrisia virgata on S. album Ferrisia virgata on P. pinnata

R. Sundararaj (*)
Institute of Wood Science and Technology, M. Mani
Bangalore 560 003, India Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
e-mail: rsundariwst@gmail.com Bangalore 560089, India

Springer India 2016 607


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_67
608 R. Sundararaj and M. Mani

variety of host plants, it was most active during and owering. During this period, it infests
August-November and March-April but very almost all parts of tree. The affected owers
much reduced during December-January (Rawat wither and fruits dry and fall off prematurely. Its
and Modi 1968). Ferrisia virgata was found infestation starts from February reaching peak
infesting Santalum album in India (Sundararaj during March and April and then it declines in
et al. 2006). Karnataka (Mangala et al. 2012). An infestation
It is emerging as an important pest on by F. virgata was reported on four tree species
Pongamia pinnata. Nymphs and adults were (Albizia lebbeck, Gliricidia sepium, Leucaena
found sucking the sap from both the surfaces of leucocephala and Cassia siamea) in a screen
leaves as well as tender shoots and owers of P. house at IITA main station, Ibadan, Nigeria
pinnata at the time of formation of new foliage (Kadiata et al. 1992).

Ferrisia virgata on white leadtree Nipaecoccus viridus on S. album

67.2 Nipaecoccus spp. and two species of dipteran parasitoids


(Sundararaj et al. 2006; Sundararaj 2008). N.
The spherical mealybug Nipaecoccus viridis viridis has been reported on Dalbergia sisso in
(Newstead) occurs on foliage, stem, branches and India. In Egypt, the lebbeck mealybug was par-
root of sandal (Chatterjee and Bose 1933). It is ticularly destructive to the lebbeck tree, Albizia
also known to infest Acacia karroo, Ficus carica, lebbeck. Releases of C. montrouzieri has resulted
Grevillea robusta, Spathodea campanulata and in establishment but were of limited effectiveness
Tamarindus indica (http://www.plantwise.org/ (Hall 1927). Two encyrtid parasitoids, Anagyrus
KnowledgeBank/Datasheet.aspx?dsid=36335. aegyptiacus Moursi and Leptomastix phenacocci
On Santalum album, the mealybug infestation Compere were introduced from Java and estab-
was found throughout the year with two peaks of lished. Parasitization levels soared to 98 %, pro-
population the rst during April-May and the viding complete biological control, so that it was
other during February-March. Besides, it was difcult to nd the host (Clausen 1978; Dahlsten
found parasitized by ten species of hymenopteran and Hall 1999). Population of N. viridis was sig-
67 Forest Plants 609

nicantly higher on branches of the woody an important role in maintaining N. viridis popu-
legume Leucaena leucocephala in northern lations at low levels (Nechols and Seibert 1985).
Guam, Mariana Is. Cryptolaemus was found
feeding on N. viridis (= N. vastator) infesting
several plants in Guam but the predator was not 67.3 Nipaecoccus lamentosus
feeding preying N. viridis when it occurred on
woody legume L. leucocephala. It might be due Nipaecoccus lamentosus (Cockerell)
to the presence of amino acid mimosin derivative (Pseudococcus lamentosus) has been recorded
which might have acted as feeding deterrent on limes, Tamarix stricta, Ficus carica [gs],
through the host (Muniappan et al. 1980). The Vitis sp. and Nerium oleander in Iran. There were
presence of the ants Technomyrmex albipes (Fr. four generations annually in the Fars region. The
Smith) decreased the percentage of N. viridis coccinellid Cryptolaemus montrouzieri has been
parasitized by the encyrtid Anagyrus indicus imported from northern Iran and has proved to be
Shafee et al. and the mortality of mealybugs was effective as a biological control agent of N. la-
attributed due to parasitism by A. indicus and pre- mentosus (Khalaf and Aberoomand 1989).
dation by other arthropods. Natural enemies play

Rastrococcus iceryoides on P. pinnata Paracoccus marginatus on teak leaf

67.4 Nipaecoccus nipae Pithecellobium saman, Samanea saman, S.


album, Wendlandia notoniana, Zizyphus mauri-
Nipaecoccus nipae (Maskell) (Pseudococcus tiana, Tephrosia candida, Vitex sp. (Varshney
nipae) completely defoliated Erythrina glauca 1992). It is reported to infest on Pongamia pin-
each year but since the introduction of C. mon- nata in and around Bangalore. Both the nymphs
trouzieri, there is no economic importance of and adults suck the plant sap from leaves and
this pest on the above tree in Puerto Rico sooty mould develops on the honey dew excreted.
(Martorell 1940). The extent of infestation was more (23 %) in
younger plantations and lower (8.0 %) in older
plantations. In some cases, due to severity of
67.5 Rastrococcus iceryoides infestation, the leaves gradually dried resulting in
defoliation of trees (Mangala et al. 2012;
The mango mealybug Rastrococcus iceryoides Sundararaj and Devaraj 2010). Rastrococcus
(Green) has been reported on several tree plants invadens was also recorded on Ficus sp. in Sri
including Ficus indicus, Mangifera indica, Lanka (Galanihe and Watson, 2012).
610 R. Sundararaj and M. Mani

67.6 Maconellicoccus hirsutus 67.7 Humococcus resinophilus

M. hirsutus (Green) (PHMB) was known to infest Humococcus resinophilus (Green) in northern
Acacia arabica and Albizzia lebbak in Egypt. India is a pest of Pinus roxburghii regeneration.
Maconelicoccus hirsutus was detected in teak As a result of heavy infestations, branches appar-
plantations in 2004 in the Banderas valley in ently turn black and die (Ben-Dov 1994).
Mexico. A biological control programme was ini-
tiated in May 2004 to release 210,000 of the
predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri on 150 ha. 67.8 Paracoccus marginatus
Damage to trees was reduced by 92 %. In India,
it has been reported on Samanea saman, Tectona In multi-tier agroforestry ecosystems of Kerala,
grandis, Tabeubuia rosea, Delonix regia (Anand India, the invasive mealybug Paracoccus margin-
Persad and Khan 2006), Ficus cunia, F. religiosa, atus Williams and Granara de Willink infestation
F. indica (Ayyar 1930; Varshney 1992). In Bahia was reported from teak, rubber, and other such
de Banderas, Nayarit, Mexico, the parasitoid plantations of Kerala even though the incidences
Anagyrus kamali Moursi regulated the popula- were highly localized. In the case of young teak
tion growth of Maconellicoccus hirsutus on teak. plantations, the immediate action taken was to
The average reduction of the pest was 96.5 % in chop off the infested branches and burn them.
30 days after release (Garcia-Valente et al. 2009). Subsequently the exotic parasitoid Acerophagus
M. hirsutus was found infesting Casuarina equi- papayae was released in the forest ecosystem to
setifolia in Andhra Pradesh (Murthy et al. 1997) control Pa. marginatus.
and Ficus trees in Gujarat, India (Muralidharan
and Badaya 2000).
67.9 Planococcus vovae

Planococcus vovae (Nasonov) was known to


infest cypress trees in Shiraz, Iran. A total of 15
species of natural enemies was found attacking
cypress tree mealybug Pl. vovae. These included
two parasitoids, Anagyrus pseudococci (Girault)
and Dusmetia fascipennis (Noys & Hayat). The
most common predators included Exochomus
quadripustulatus (L.) Hyperaspis polita Weise,
Nephus bipunctatus (Kugelann), Chrysoperla car-
nea (Stephens), Suarius fedtschenkoi (McLachlan
in Fedchenko), Dicrodiplosis manihoti Harris and
Geocoris quercicola Linnavuor (Lotfalizadeh and
Ahmadi 2000) and Coccidoxenoides perminutus
Girault (Talebi et al. 2008). P. vovae is a common
pest of cypress trees in Greece (Milonas and Kozar
2008). C. montrouzieri adults and larvae were
detected in Turkey during May and June on cypress
trees (Cupressus sempervirens L.) heavily infested
with P. vovae (Yigit and Canhilal 1998). It was
found attacking the conifers, e.g., Chamaecyparis,
Cupressocyparis, Cupressus, Libocedrus and
Thuja in Poland. Insecticides Actellic [pirimiphos-
methyl] 500 EC and Ultracid [methidathion] 40
Saman tree killed by heavy EC for its control were recommended (Golan and
PHM B infestation Jaskiewicz 2002).
67 Forest Plants 611

Planococcus vovae Oracella acuta on slash pine Close up of the mealybug

67.10 Phenacoccus azaleae but they may severely retard growth (http://for-
estpests.org/vd/7047.html). Three native parasit-
The Bunge Prickly-Ash tree plant (Zanthoxylum oids, Zarhopalus debarri Sun, Acerophagus
bungeanum) damaged by the mealybug coccois Smith and Allotropa oracellae Masner
Phenacoccus azaleae Kuwana which attracts its help regulate this mealybugs population size in
natural enemy, the ladybug Harmonia axyridis the southeast United States. All three parasitoids
(Pallas), was studied in Tainhang Mountain Area were imported to China and released in heavily
of Shanxi Province, China, during 19992001 infested slash pine plantations (Clarke et al. 2010).
(Xie et al. 2004).

67.10.2 Pseudococcus viburni


67.10.1 Oracella acuta (=Pseudococcus obscurus)

The mealybug Oracella acuta (Lobdell) is native Judas tree, Cercis siliquastrum, is a small decidu-
to the south-eastern United States. Hosts of this ous tree from Southern Europe and Western Asia
mealybug include loblolly (Pinus taeda L.), slash which is noted for its prolic display of deep pink
(Pinus elliottii Engelm.), Virginia (Pinus virgin- owers in spring. Heavy predation by
iana Miller), shortleaf (Pinus echinata Miller), Cryptolaemus montrouzieri was observed on Ps.
and longleaf (Pinus palustris Miller) pine (http:// viburni (Signoret) infesting Judas trees in ave-
forestpests.org/vd/7047.html). O. acuta was acci- nues of Turin resulting in small mealybug popu-
dentally introduced into Guangdong, southern lation in subsequent years (Arzone 1983).
China, in 1988 on scions of slash pine (Pinus
elliottii) and found damaged pine trees (Sun
Jiang Hua et al. 1996). Mealybugs either settle on 67.11 Peliococcus serratus
the shoot or occasionally between the needles
near the fascicle. Females secrete a characteristic American Beech Fagus grandifolia is an impor-
white resin cell that covers their body. The tips of tant tree in forestry. Peliococcus serratus (Ferris)
new shoots are the preferred settling site, though was known to attack F. grandifolia in Maryland,
the entire shoot may be colonized when popula- USA. The mealybug had two generations in a
tions are high. The resin cells, shoots, and nee- year. The eggs were laid in an ovisac on the bark
dles may become covered with black, sooty in June-August (hatching in 710 days) and in
mould growing on honeydew produced by the October-November (these overwintering, hatch-
mealybug. Infestations rarely cause tree mortality, ing in late April or early May). Limiting factors
612 R. Sundararaj and M. Mani

included adverse weather conditions, parasitoids 67.15 Palmicultor lumpurensis


and predators (Russell 1987). and Chaetococcus bambusae

67.12 Pseudococcus aurilanatus Palmicultor lumpurensis (Takahashi) and


Chaetococcus bambusae (Maskell) had estab-
In South Australia, C. montrouzieri played a key lished in Florida, USA. The potential economic
role in controlling the golden mealybug, impact of these invasive species for Floridas
Pseudococcus aurilanatus (Maskell) a serious bamboo is not yet known. Monitoring of popula-
pest of Norfolk Islands pines, Araucaria excelsa tions from each of these invasive species will be
(Vosler 1920). important for the native bamboo species,
Arundinaria gigantea, and for ornamental bam-
boo stands (Hodges and Hodges 2004). The bam-
67.13 Plotococcus spp. boo mealybug Palmicultor lumpurensis causes
considerable damage to the host plant. New
Plotococcus capixaba Kondo was found infest- shoots are more susceptible to damage and heavy
ing the leaves of the jaboticaba tree, Myrciaria populations can cause abortion of new shoots.
jaboticaba at Espirito Santo and Leandra erina- Severe infestations could potentially kill stands
cea at Sao Paulo. Plotococcus hambletoni Kondo of bamboo.
was collected in Sao Paulo on a myrtaceous plant
(Kondo et al. 2005).

67.14 Antonina spp.

Bamboo node mealybugs, Antonina sp., in the


absence of attending ants, produced long waxy
laments both in the greenhouse and in the eld
conducted in the Philippines. In contrast, ant-
attended mealybugs had only very short laments
or none at all. Ant exclusion experiments using
potted Bambusa tuldoides and B. vulgaris var.
vitatta conrmed the eld observations. The
available data suggest that the long laments are
an adaptation for the dispersal of honeydew in the
absence of solicitous ants to avoid drowning in
the accumulating honeydew or suffocation due to
development of sooty moulds (Lit et al. 1999).
Eleven species of Antonina were reported on
bamboos from Taiwan, China, Japan, and the
U.S. (California) (Williams and Miller 2002). Palmicultor lumpurensis
67 Forest Plants 613

67.16 Dysmicoccus obesus 67.20 Dysmicoccus spp.

Dysmicoccus obesus (Lobdell) was found in Serianthes nelsonii is a large tree endemic to
Arkansas living in crevices under bark scales of Guam and Rota of the Mariana Islands. Three
loblolly pine trees (Pinus taeda). Most individu- species of mealybugs, Dysmicoccus neobrevipes
als (77 %) were found on the bole between 0 and Beardsley, D. brevipes (Cockerell), and
90 cm of the ground, and they showed slight pref- Planococcus citri (Risso), feed on the leaves, leaf
erences for the northern and southern bole expo- buds, branch tips, and roots of trees and seed-
sures. Individuals of the formicid Crematogaster lings. On the cultivated tree in Yona, up to 40 %
were observed tending the mealybug. Three of the branch tips were killed every two weeks by
broods per year were detected, with adults pro- a combination of D. neobrevipes and P. citri.
duced in May, July and September. It is suggested Most mealybug colonies were removed by preda-
that D. obesus probably overwinters off the tree tors, including the lady beetle Nephus roepkei
as immatures. The documented occurrence of D. (Fluiter) (Coccinellidae). Seedlings may remain
obesus from ten southern and south-eastern states vulnerable to mealybugs for longer periods of
in the USA suggests that its distribution is prob- time; malathion effectively killed the mealybugs
ably throughout the range of its host, P. taeda. on the seedlings (Gary et al. 1996).
Records from Maryland indicated that the pseu-
dococcid also feeds on Virginia pine (P. virgin-
iana) (Thompson and Colvin 1990). 67.21 Management

Inspecting seedlings and young trees regularly is


67.17 Chaetococcus sp. essential for early detection. The branches, heav-
ily infested by these coccid bugs, should be
On the bamboo Gigantochloa scortechinii in lopped and burnt. Eggs of the mealybugs, pro-
Malaysia, the ant Tetraponera sp. was found to tected by waxy lamentous secretions of ovisacs,
be always associated with the pseudococcid are almost impossible to reach with insecticides.
Chaetococcus sp. (Klein et al. 1992). Late instar nymphs and adult female mealybugs
are not affected by foliar application of insecti-
cides since they are covered with waxy coating.
67.18 Pseudococcus baliteus Besides, spraying with suitable insecticides may
not be economically and environmentally viable.
In Philippines, Pseudococcus baliteus Lit was Hence, biological control particularly the third
recorded on prop roots of Ficus elastica (Lit and type that involves the supplemental release of
Calilung 1994). natural enemies is the best control option in for-
estry. Among the predators, coccinellids com-
monly known as ladybird beetles are mainly
67.19 Acaciacoccus spp. free-living species that consume a large number
of preys during their lifetime. They feed on mealy
Acaciacoccus hockingi Williams and Matile was bugs, and other injurious insect and mites and
recorded in swollen thorns of Acacia drepanolo- keep the insect populations under control. Proven
bium in Tanzania. The species was tended by natural enemies of the respective mealybug spe-
Crematogaster nigriceps prelli. It was not found cies can be used for their suppression on forest
without this formicid in attendance and appeared plants. Hence, it is vital to exploit natural ene-
to be reliant on C. n. prelli to remove honeydew mies to develop ecologically and environmen-
from the thorns (Williams and Matile-Ferrero tally sound insect pest management in forestry
1994) (Table 67.1).
614 R. Sundararaj and M. Mani

Table 67.1 List of mealybug species infesting different forest plants


Mealybug species Vegetables Region/country Reference
Anaparaputo liui Borchsenius Ficus China Ben-Dov (1994)
Antonina banbusae Khalid & Bamboo India Williams (2004)
Shafee
Antonina meghalayaensis Bamboo India Khalid and Shafee
Khalid & Shafee (1988b)
Antonina pretiosa Ferris Bamboo USA, China, Cuba Ben-Dov (1994)
Antonina thiensis Takahashi Bamboo Thailand Takahashi (1951b)
Antonina zonata Green Bamboo Thailand Takahashi (1951b)
Apodrastacoccus onar Williama Acacia Australia Williams (1985a)
Astraputa eucalypti Williams Eucalyptus Australia Williams (1985b)
Cataencoccus barbatus (De Acacia Tanzania Ben-Dov (1994)
Lotto)
Cataencoccus hispidus Ficus Java, Malaysia Williams (2004)
(Morrision)
Cataencoccus mazoensis (Hall) Acacia Zimbabwe Ben-Dov (1994)
Cataencoccus olivaceus Ficus California Ben-Dov (1994)
(Cockerell)
Cataencoccus villosus (De Acacia South Africa Ben-Dov (1994)
Lotto)
Chaetococcus bambusae Bamboos Uganda, Brazil, Ben-Dov (1994)
(Maskell) Hawaii, Sri Lanka &
China
Cirnecococcus policis (Mamet) Eugenia Mauritius Ben-Dov (1994)
Conlicoccus Beardsley Eucalyptus Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Williams
Crinticoccus cus Williams Ficus Solomon Islands Ben-Dov (1994)
Crisicoccus acaciae Williams Acacia Solomon Islands Ben-Dov (1994)
Crisicoccus chalpus (Williams) Ficus Solomon Islands Ben-Dov (1994)
Crisicoccus matsumotoi Ficus Japan, Korea Ben-Dov (1994)
(Siraiwa)
Crisicoccus pini (Kuwana) Pines California & Japan Ben-Dov (1994)
Deltococcus tafaensis Casurina Ghana Ben-Dov (1994)
(Strickland)
Dysmicoccus acaciarum Acacia Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Williams
Dysmicoccus aciculus Ferris Pines California Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus angustus (Ezzat Bamboo New Jersey & China Ben-Dov (1994)
& McConnel)
Dysmicoccus anicus Williams Acacia & Eucalyptus Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus banksi Williams Acacia Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus bispinosus Acacia Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
Beardsley
Dysmicoccus brevipes Date palm Ben-Dov (1994)
(Cockrell)
Dysmicoccus casuarinas Casurina Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Williams
Dysmicoccus grassii (Leonardi) Acacia Neotropical region Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus hawrahicus Casurina Tasmania Ben-Dov (1994)
Williams
Dysmicoccus kaiensis (Kanda) Bambusa Japan Ben-Dov (1994)
(continued)
67 Forest Plants 615

Table 67.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Vegetables Region/country Reference
Dysmicoccus nesophilus Pines, Erithrina Austroriental & Ben-Dov (1994)
Williams & Watson Pacic region
Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Tectona grandis, Tamarind Ben-Dov (1994)
Beardsley
Dysmicoccus periius Williams Acacia Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Dysmicoccus pinecolus Pines Mexico Ben-Dov (1994)
McKenzie
Dysmicoccus senegalensis Casurina Senegal Ben-Dov (1994)
Balachowsky
Dysmicoccus texensis (Tinsley) Acacia Mexico Ben-Dov (1994)
Epicoccus acacia (Maskell) Acacia Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Erium globosum (Maskell) Acacia Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Eucalyptococcus brookesae Eucalyptus Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Williams
Eucalyptococcus gisleni Eucalyptus Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
(Ossiannilsson)
Eurycoccus monody Acacia Kenya Ben-Dov (1994)
Balachosky & Ferrero
Eurycoccus saudiensis Matile Acacia Saudi Arabia Ben-Dov (1994)
Ferrero
Ferrisia consobrina Williams & Tectoma grandis Australian, Ethiopian, Ben-Dov (1994)
Watson Neotropical & Pacic
region
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) Acacia, Ficus India Williams (2004)
Fijicoccus casurainae Williams Casurina Fiji Ben-Dov (1994)
& Watson
Formicoccus Erythrina India Williams (2004)
erythrinae sp.n.
Geococcus coffeae Green Ficus Ben-Dov (1994)
Heliococcus bambusae Bambusa China &Taiwan Ben-Dov (1994)
(Takahashi)
Heliococcus takae (Kuwana) Bambusa China & Japan Ben-Dov (1994)
Idiococcus bambusa Takshashi Bambusa Japan Ben-Dov (1994)
& Kanda
Indococcus pipalae Ali Ficus India Williams (2004)
Itycoccus beardsleyi Williams Acacia Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Itycoccus milprinkae Williams Acacia Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Laingiococcus painei (Laing) Ficus Papua New Guinea Ben-Dov (1994)
Maconellicoccus auatraliensis Acacia Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
(Green & Lidgett)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus Aegle marmelos, Albizia Many countries manatee.ifas.u.edu/
(Green) spp., Bauhinia spp. comm-hort/pdf/
Caesalpinia spp., Casuarina pest-topics/
spp., Cordia, Syzygium, InsectPHMHosts.pdf
Tabebuia, Erthrina spp.,
Haldina. agerstroemia,
Melia, Cassia spp.
Parkinsonia, a,
Tamarindusia & Terminalia
spp.
Ficus, Tectona grandis & Ben-Dov (1994)
Tamarind
(continued)
616 R. Sundararaj and M. Mani

Table 67.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Vegetables Region/country Reference
Maconellicoccus ugandae Acacia Ghana Ben-Dov (1994)
(Laing)
Melanococcus albizziae Acacia, Albizia Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
(Maskell)
Niapecoccus brasilicus Ficus Brazil Ben-Dov (1994)
Williams & Granara de Willink
Niapecoccus gilli Williams & Acacia Mexico Ben-Dov (1994)
Granara de Willink
Niapecoccus guazumae Acacia & Ficus Columbia Ben-Dov (1994)
(Balachowsky)
Niapecoccus nipae (Makell) Ficus Ben-Dov (1994)
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) Acacia, Ficus Many countries Ben-Dov (1994)
Albizia & Tamarind
Paracoccus barymelus Williams Casurina Papua New Guinea Ben-Dov (1994)
& Watson
Paraputo anomala (Newstead) Acacia Tanzania Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus eugeniae Eugenia Mongolia Ben-Dov (1994)
Takahashi
Phenacoccus hystrix Pines Germany Ben-Dov (1994)
(Baerensprung)
Paraputo leveri (Green) Ficus Papua New Guinea Ben-Dov (1994)
Peliococcus subcoticola Casurina & Eucalyptus Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Williams
Peridiococcus ethtelae (Fuller) Casurina Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Phenacoccus aceris (Signoret) Ficus Nearctic & Palaearctic Ben-Dov (1994)
region
Phenacoccus hargreavesi Ficus Ethiopian region
(Laing)
Phenacoccus madeirensis Ficus Pakistan Williams (2004)
Green
Phenacoccus pratti Takahashi Eucalyptus Malaysia Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcoides robustus (Ezzat Ficus & date palm Bangladesh, India & Williams (2004)
& McConnel) Pakistan
Planococcus citri (Risso) Cassia & Delonix regia Ben-Dov (1994)
Teakwood India Williams (2004)
Planococcus cus (Signoret) Date palm Many countries Ben-Dov (1994)
Planococcus dorsopinosus Ficus Philippine, India & Williams (2004)
Ezzat & McConnel Thailand
Planococcus kraunhiae Casurina Taiwan, China, Japan Ben-Dov (1994)
(Kuwana)
Planococcus lilacinus Acacia, Ficus & Eugenia Ben-Dov (1994)
(Cockrell)
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Casurina, Ficus, Eucalyptus, Ben-Dov (1994)
Tectona grandis
Planococcus nigritulus De Ficus, date palm Tanzania Ben-Dov (1994)
Lotto
Plotococcus subterraneus De Ficus South Africa Ben-Dov (1994)
Lotto
(continued)
67 Forest Plants 617

Table 67.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Vegetables Region/country Reference
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel Date palm Maldives Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus viburni P = afnis Eucalyptus Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus bombusicola Bamboos Ben-Dov (1994)
Takahashi
Pseudococcus calceolarieae Ficus Ben-Dov (1994)
(Maskell)
Pseudococcus comsocki Ficus Ben-Dov (1994)
(Kuwana)
Pseudococcus eucalypticus Eucalyptus Australia Ben-Dov (1994)
Williams
Pseudococcus kikuyensis James Ficus Sudan & Kenya Ben-Dov (1994)
Pseudococcus longispinus Acacia, cus, date palm, Ben-Dov (1994)
(Targioni-Tozzetti) Carambola & pines
Pseudococcus moribensis Casurina Malaysia Williams (2004)
Takahashi
Pseudococcus occiduus Ficus Ethiopian Ben-Dov (1994)
DeLotto
Rasrococcus iceryoides (Green) Caesalpinia & cus Many countries Ben-Dov (1994)
Ficus & teak India Williams (2004)
Rasrococcus invadens Williams Ficus Indonesia Williams (2004)
Rasrococcus spinosus Ficus Malaysia Williams (2004)
(Robinson)
Rhizoecus americanus Ficus Nearctic, neotropical. Ben-Dov (1994)
(Hambleton) Palaearctic region
Trionymus bambusa (Green) Bambusa Bangladesh, India, Sri Williams (2004)
Lanka
Trionymus internodii (Hall) Bambusa Egypt & Israel Ben-Dov (1980)
Xenococcus annandalei Ficus Malaysia & India Williams (2004)
Silvestri

Ben-Dov Y (1980) Observations on scale insects


References (Homoptera: Coccoidea) of the Middle East. Bull Ent
Res 70:261271
Ali SM (1970) A catalogue of the Oriental Coccoidea. Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealy-
(Part III.) (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea). Indian bugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea:
Museum Bull 5:994 Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geograph-
Anand Persad B, Khan A (2006) Attractiveness of hibis- ical distribution, host plants, biology and economic
cus mealybug to different plant species. Insect Environ importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 p
11(4):17576 Chatterjee NC, Bose M (1933) Entomological Investigations
Arzone A (1983) Pseudococcus obscures Essig and on the spike disease of Sandal (13), Membracidae &
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. in Turin. In: Af Cercopidae (Homopt.), Supplementary data. The Indian
XII Congresso National Italiano di Entomologia, Forest Records (Entomology series), Forest Research
Turin Itali Instituto di Entomologia Agraria e Institute, Dehra Dun 19(2):110
Apicoltura, Universita di Torino, Torino, pp 448452 Clarke SR, Yu HB, Chen MR, Debarr GL, Sun JH (2010)
Ayyar TV R (1930) A contribution to our knowledge of Classical biological control program for the mealybug
South Indian Coccidae (Scales and Mealybugs). Oracella acuta in Guangdong Province, China. Insect
Bulletin of the Imperial Institute of Agricultural Sci 17:129139. Available on line at http://onlinelibrary.
Research, Pusa, India 197:173 wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2009.01292.x/pdf
618 R. Sundararaj and M. Mani

Clausen CP (1978) Introduced parasites and predators of Lotfalizadeh H, Ahmadi AA (2000) Natural enemies of
arthropod pests and weeds: a world review. USDA cypress tree mealybug, Planococcus vovae (Nasonov),
ARS Agriculture Handbook No. 480, 455 p and their parasitoids in Shiraz, Iran. Iran Agri Res
Dahlsten DL, Hall RW (1999) Biological control of 19(2):145154
insects in outdoor urban environments. In: Bellows Mangala N, Sundararaj R, Nagaveni HC (2012) Scales
TS, Fisher TW (eds) Handbook of biological control: and mealybugs (Coccoidea: Hemiptera) infesting
principles and applications. Academic, San Diego/ Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre and their population
New York, 1046 p dynamics in Karnataka, India. Ann Forest
Galanihe LD, Watson GW (2012) Identication of 20(1):11015
Rastrococcus rubellus Williams (Hemiptera: Martorell LF (1940) Some notes on forest entomology.
Pseudococcidae) on Mango: a new record to Sri Carib For 1:2324
Lanka. Tropic Agric Res Ext 15(2):710 Milonas PG, Kozar F (2008) Check list of mealybugs
Garcia-Valente F, Ortega-Arenas LD, Gonzalez- (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in Greece: three new
Hernandez H, Villanueva-Jimenez JA, Lopez-Collado records. Hellenic Plant Protect J 1(1):3538
J, Gonzalez-Hernandez A, Arredondo-Bernal HC Muniappan R, Blas T, Duenas JJ (1980) Predatory deter-
(2009) Natural and induced parasitism of Anagyrus rent effect of Leucaena leucocephala on the coccinel-
kamali against pink hibiscus mealybug on teak shoots lid, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. Micronesia
in Bahia de Banderas, Nayarit. [Spanish, English]. 16:360362
Agrociencia (Montecillo) 43(7):729738 Muralidharan CM, Badaya SN (2000) Mealybug
Golan K, Jaskiewicz B (2002) Noxiousness and control of (Maconellicoccus hirsutus) (Pseudococcidae:
the juniper mealy bug, Planococcus vovae [Polish]. Hemiptera) out break on herbaceum cotton (Gossypium
Ochrona Roslin 46(6):1112 herbaceum) in Wagad cotton belt of Kachchh. Indian
Hall WJ (1927) The introduction of Cryptolaemus mon- J Agri Sci 70(10):705706
trouzieri Muls. in Egypt. Bull Ent Res 17:385392 Murthy GR, Babu TR, Murthy GR, Babu TR (1997)
Hodges G, Hodges A (2004) New invasive species of Casuarina as an alternate host to grape mealybug,
mealybugs, Palmicultor lumpurensis and Maconellicoccus hirsutus. J Res ANGRAU
Chaetococcus bambusae (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: 25(4):89
Pseudococcidae), on bamboo in Florida. Fla Entomol Nechols JR, Seibert TF (1985) Biological control of the
87(3):396397 spherical mealybug, Nipaecoccus vastator
Kadiata BD, Ntonifor NN, Mulongoy K (1992) A severe (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae): assessment by ant
mealybug infestation on some tree legumes. Nitro Fix exclusion. Environ Entomol 14(1):4547
Tree Res Rep 10:7072 Rawat RR, Modi BN (1968) Preliminary study on Ferrisia
Khalaf J, Aberoomand GH (1989) Some preliminary (Ferrisiana) virgata (Ckll.), white mealy bug
research on the biology and biological control of (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in Madhya Pradesh.
mealybug in Fars province of Iran [Persian]. Madras Agri J 55(6):277282
Entomologie et Phytopathologie Appliquees Russell LM (1987) Habits and biology of the beech
56(12):27 mealybug, Peliococcus serratus (Ferris) (Coccoidea,
Khalid M, Shafee AS (1988) Descriptions of three new Pseudococcidae). Proc Entomol Soc Wash
species of Pseudococcidae (Homoptera) from North 89(2):359362
East India. Indian J Syst Entomol 5:6573 Sun Jiang Hua, De Barr GL, Liu Tong Xian, Berisford
Klein RW, Kovac D, Schellerich A, Maschwitz U (1992) CW, Clarke SR (1996) An unwelcome guest in China:
Mealybug-carrying by swarming queens of a south- a pine-feeding mealybug. J For 94(10):2732
east Asian bamboo-inhabiting ant. Naturwissenschaften Sundararaj R (2008) Population dynamics, parasitoids
79(9):422423 and chemical control of the spherical mealybug
Kondo T, Gullan PJ, Ventura JA, Culik MP (2005) Nipaecoccus viridis on sandal. Indian J Plant Protect
Taxonomy and biology of the mealybug genus 36(1):1518
Plotococcus Miller & Denno (Hemiptera: Sundararaj R, Devaraj R (2010) Record of Mango
Pseudococcidae) in Brazil, with descriptions of two Mealybug, Rastrococcus iceryoides (Green)
new species. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ (Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera) on Pongamia pinnata
40(3):213227 (L.) Pierre in Karnataka. Indian For 136(2):
Lit IL Jr, Calilung VJ (1994) Philippine mealybugs of the 269270
genus Pseudococcus (Pseudococcidae, Coccoidea, Sundararaj R, Karibasavaraj LR, Sharma G,
Hemiptera). Philip Entomol 9(3):254267 Muthukrishnan R (2006) Scales and Mealybugs
Lit IL Jr, Caasi-Lit M, Talidong CV Jr (1999) The produc- (Coccoidea: Hemiptera) infesting Sandal (Santalum
tion of long anal laments by the bamboo node mealy- album Linn.). Entomon 31(3):239241
bug, Antonina sp. (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Takahashi R (1951) Some mealybugs (Pseudococcidae,
Pseudococcidae), as a response to lack of attending Homoptera) from the Malay Peninsula. Indian
ants. Entomologica 33:311316 J Entomol 12:122
67 Forest Plants 619

Talebi AA, Ameri A, Rakhshani E (2008) Natural ene- Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
mies of cypress tree mealybug, Planococcus Natural History Museum, London, UK and Southdene
vovae (Nasonov) (Hem., Pseudococcidae), and their SDN. BHD, Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
parasitoids in Tehran, Iran. J Agri Sci Tech 10(2): Williams DJ, Matile-Ferrero D (1994) A new genus and
123133 species of mealybug (Homoptera: Coccoidea:
Thompson LC, Colvin RJ (1990) Biological notes on the Pseudococcidae) associated with ants in swollen thorn
mealybug Dysmicoccus obesus (Homoptera: acacias in Tanzania. Annales de la Societe
Pseudococcidae) on loblolly pine in southern Entomologique de France 30(3):273277
Arkansas. J Entomolog Sci 25(1):8998 Williams DJ, Miller DR (2002) Systematic studies on the
Varshney RK (1992) A checklist of the scale insects and Antonina crawi Cockerell (Hemiptera: Coccoidea:
mealybugs of south Asia. Records of Zoological Pseudococcidae) complex of pest mealybugs. Proc
Survey of India, Occasional paper No. 139, 152 p Entomol Soc Wash 104(4):896911
Vosler EJ (1920) Insect enemies. Sci Ind Melbourne Xie Ying Ping, Xue Jiao Liang, Tang Xiao Yan, Zhao Shi
2:184186 L (2004) The Bunge Prickly-Ash tree damaged by a
Wiles GJ, Schreiner IH, Nafus D, Jurgensen LK, mealybug, Phenacoccus azaleae attracting the lady-
Manglona JC (1996) The status, biology, and conser- bug, Harmonia axyridis [Chinese]. Scientia Silvae
vation of serianthes nelsonii (fabaceae), an endan- Sinicae 40(5):116122
gered micronesian tree. Biol Conserv 76:229239 Yigit A, Canhilal R (1998) Introduction into East
Williams DJ (1985a) Australian mealybugs. British Mediterranean region of cold-tolerant ecotypes of the
Museum (Natural History) London, pp 431 citrus mealybugs predator [Cryptolaemus montrouz-
Williams DJ (1985b) Some scale insects (Hom. ieri Muls. (Col.:Coccinellidae)], some biological
Coccoidea) from the island of Nauru. Entomologists properties and their adaptation to the region (Turkish).
Monthly Magazine 121:53 Bitki Koruma Bulteni 38:2341
Glasshouse, Greenhouse
and Polyhouse Crops 68
K. Gopalakrishna Pillai

Protected environments such as glasshouse/ feeds upon perennial crops such as cycad and
greenhouse/net house/polyhouse are those that Phormium tenax. Ferrisia virgata (Ckll.) appears
maintain plants year round. They provide optimal in a very severe form on poinsettia in the poly-
conditions for insect and mite pests to survive, house. In glasshouse, the obscure mealybug,
develop, and reproduce. Mealybugs are serious Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret), and
pests of various crops in greenhouses and proba- Phenacoccus gossypii (Townsend and Cockerell)
bly the most difcult-to-control pests in green- are found on chrysanthemum. Maconellicoccus
houses. Mealybugs are not particular about their hirsutus (Green), Paracoccus marginatus
hosts, and probably all species of crops are sus- (Williams and Granara de Willink), and
ceptible to mealybugs, especially when cultivated Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) are also found
in protected environments. on several crops in greenhouses. Phenacoccus
madeirensis (Green) has become an increasingly
damaging pest in greenhouse ornamental produc-
68.1 Mealybug Species tion. Maconellicoccus hirsutus is known to attack
many species of ornamental plants including
There are a number of different mealybugs of Allamanda, Angelica, Anthurium, Bougainvillea,
concern to greenhouse growers. In greenhouses Croton, ginger lily, Heliconia, Ixora, hibiscus,
of California, the most frequently found mealy- palm, and oleander. The lily bulb mealybug
bugs are the long-tailed mealybug, Pseudococcus Vryburgia amaryllidis (Bouch) and the obscure
longispinus (Targioni-Tozzetti) and the citrus mealybug Pseudococcus viburni were commonly
mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso) (Lain and found as well. Vryburgia amaryllidis is limited to
Parrella 2004). Planococcus citri is the most a few plant families (especially Liliaceae and
common and damaging insect pest in greenhouse Iridaceae). It occurs on the bulb and on the basal
and protected cultures. With the exception of portion of the leaves. Pseudococcus viburni was
roses, P. citri feeds on many short-term crops found both on the roots and the aerial portion of
such as coleus, whereas P. longispinus often the plants, most commonly on short-term crops.
Root mealybugs (Rhizoecus spp.) feed on the
root systems of plants; so, they can be undetected
for long periods of time. Phenacoccus solenopsis
K.G. Pillai (*) occurs more commonly on the roots, stems, and
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India foliage close to the soil line in dry climates, com-
e-mail: pillaig@iihr.ernet.in pared to settling on the upper foliage of the plant.

Springer India 2016 621


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_68
622 K.G. Pillai

68.2 Damage 68.3 Monitoring

The most common species of mealybugs that Monitoring of immature and adult mealybugs is
infest crops are immediately recognized in the to be carried out on the stems, leaves, and ow-
adult stage by the white, yellowish-white, ers. The mealybugs survive several millimeters
whitish-gray, or pale pink to pale blue color coat- below the soil surface. Observations should be
ing. Mealybugs can be found on all plant parts, directed to all plant tissues for the white waxy
especially roots, rhizomes, pseudobulbs, and the specimens. Sticky traps set out in the greenhouse
underside of leaves. They are adept at hiding on can be used to detect the presence of mealybug.
roots and rhizomes deep in the potting media, in Once mealybugs become established, it is dif-
crevices, and under sheaths. Mealybugs are cult to achieve effective control. Incoming plants
active and crawl from one plant to another, pot to should be inspected for signs of mealybugs.
pot, and across benches. Mealybugs hide under Roots of newly purchased plants should be
rims of pots and trays, in bench crevices, and inspected for the root mealybug. Greenhouses
even drop from overhead plants. The mealybugs should be kept as weed-free as possible.
species have the ability to increase rapidly in Operational parameters of traps baited with the
population size in a relatively short period of pheromones of three mealybug species were
time. With their piercingsucking mouthparts, optimized in nurseries producing ornamental
they feed on leaf and stem axils, and even on the plants. All pheromone doses (1320 g) attracted
roots of some plants. The mealybugs damage the P. longispinus and P. viburni males, with the low-
plant by extracting the sap, which stresses the est dose (1 g) attracting the fewest males for
plant, resulting in the leaves becoming chlorotic both species. Doses of 3.2100 g were as attrac-
and shedding over time, as well as fruit bodies tive to male P. longispinus as the highest dose
being aborted. Flowers often take on an abnormal (320 g); doses from 10 to 320 g were equally
shape, reducing yield. Infested leaves become attractive for P. viburni males. Lures containing
curled and crinkled, acquiring a rosette pattern, 25-g doses of either pheromone had effective
with the plant appearing bushy and stunted. In eld lifetimes of at least 12 weeks. When
addition, the high numbers of developing mealy- pheromone-baited traps for P. longispinus were
bugs produce large amounts of honeydew that compared with manual sampling, trap counts of
fall onto the lower leaves, producing a substrate male mealybugs were signicantly correlated
for the development of sooty mould, which inhib- with mealybugs counted on plants in the vicinity
its photosynthesis within the plant. of the traps (Waterworth et al. 2011).
Mealybugs can be serious and persistent pests
in the greenhouse. Host plant range depends on
the particular mealybug species, and includes 68.4 Management
herbaceous annuals or perennials, foliage plants,
orchids, vegetables, and herbs. Some of the Mealybug management in greenhouses is dif-
greenhouse crops prone to mealybug infestations cult because of their propensity to move into the
include coleus, croton, dracaena, hoya, English potting medium and feeding on roots, or for the
ivy, cus, fuchsia, stephanotis, schefera, hibis- crawlers to work their way into tight places.
cus, mandevilla, strawberry plant (houseplant), Repeated application of any treatment is required
jade plants, palms, prayer plants, gardenia, and to kill the immature, and treatments are at their
orchids as well as many other foliage plants. The greatest effectiveness against the small crawlers.
mealybugs have been found feeding on mari- All control efforts must begin immediately
golds, gerbera, daisies, poinsettias, begonias, and following discovery. Even light infestations
chrysanthemums. restricted to one or a few plants can explode
68 Glasshouse, Greenhouse and Polyhouse Crops 623

rapidly and necessitate chemical methods. When can live up to 6 weeks and can continue to repro-
required, infested plants should be isolated duce after crop harvest. Severe pruning of
immediately from others to prevent the mealy- infected plants can be considered to allow for
bugs from moving among them. Also, the lips better spray coverage, followed by an aggressive
and cracks of pots, trays, and benches should be control program. As soon as an infestation is
checked, because females will wander and leave detected, infested plants should be isolated and
the plant to nd hiding places. The physical con- treated. It is important to prune or cut infested
ditions in greenhouses approach an optimum stems or branches from plants and destroy the
environment for the uncontrolled increase in infested plant material. Also, stalks and crop resi-
populations of phytophagous insects. Once the due in infested sites should be removed and
insect is introduced, the greenhouse structure destroyed, as such residue left in the greenhouse
affords warm temperature, high humidity, and a can harbor mealybugs, which can survive to
physical barrier, isolating the pest from the natu- invade the new crop. It is necessary to sanitize
rally occurring predators and parasites. Effective equipments and check clothing items to prevent
chemical control of insects in greenhouse condi- the transfer of the pest into new locations. Small
tions when plant diversity is high is difcult. populations of mealybugs can be controlled by
Compact growth habit, certain structural plant inspection of plants, removing, and handpicking
forms such as leaf sheaths, and dense foliage, all the specimens from newly infested plants. Soap
prevent adequate application of the chemical to applications are often effective against targeted
the entire plant. Failure to treat all surfaces, along small populations of the mealybug.
with sublethal dosages due to improper applica-
tion rates and pest diversity contribute to a seri-
ous problem encountered by greenhouses 68.6 Chemical Control
todayresistance and resurgence. The phenom-
enon of pesticide resistance followed by a rapid The conventional management tactics for mealy-
resurgence of the surviving insects can cause an bugs in greenhouse ornamental production
actual increase in the pest population following include regular application of insecticides.
chemical application. Persistent populations of mealybugs or infesta-
tion in many plants may demand the need for use
of synthetic insecticides. Well-established infes-
68.5 Cultural/Physical/mechanical tations are difcult to control, because their waxy
control and sanitary secretions help to protect the young nymphs and
measures eggs from penetration with chemical sprays. The
crawler stage, which does not possess a waxy
Prevention is the most important element of covering, is most susceptible to insecticides,
mealybug control. Careful selection of clean cut- including insect growth regulators (e.g., azadi-
ting materials before propagation is critical. If rachtin, buprofezin, and kinoprene), insecticidal
needed, the cutting materials could be treated soaps (potassium salts of fatty acids), horticul-
with pesticides before rooting. Planting material tural oils (petroleum-based), and possibly insect-
should not be taken from infested elds. It should killing fungi (Beauveria bassiana).
be made sure that transplants are clean and The types of insecticide applications include
healthy before introducing into elds. Sanitation foliar sprays and those directed toward the grow-
is the second most important element of control. ing medium (drench or granule). Adult mealy-
Fields should be scouted regularly, checking bugs are difcult to manage, because they form a
entire plants, paying attention to ants and other white, waxy protective covering that is nearly
crawling insects that move mealybugs. impervious to most insecticides. And, because
Aggressive control programs, if present, could be most insecticides have no activity on eggs (with
implemented immediately. Sanitation in green- the possible exception of petroleum-based or
houses and shade houses is critical. The female neem oils), at least 23 weekly applications
624 K.G. Pillai

usually are required to achieve satisfactory sup- Growth Regulators and Chitin Inhibitors are
pression, especially when dealing with overlap- classes of insecticides that have some potential
ping generations. Although very few (if any) for mealybug management. The insect growth
insecticides are able to penetrate the waxy cover- regulator (IGR) buprofezin was not decisive;
ing of mealybugs, those containing ethyl alcohol however, the IGR pyriproxyfen and the insecti-
(ethanol), such as some oil-based insecticides, cide onicamid were not directly or indirectly
may allow the material to penetrate through the harmful to the predator C. montrouzieri and para-
waxy covering, killing mealybugs. When apply- sitoid L. dactylopii, indicating that these insecti-
ing high-volume sprays, thorough coverage is cides are compatible with both the natural
imperative, especially when using contact insec- enemies when used together for the control of
ticides, because mealybugs are commonly citrus mealybug in greenhouses and conservato-
located in areas that are not easily accessible, ries (Cloyd and Dickinson 2006).
such as the base of leaf petioles, leaf sheaths, and Systemic insecticides, those that move
leaf undersides. Adding a spreader-sticker to a throughout plant parts, may also be used to
spray solution may be helpful in improving cov- protect plants from mealybug infestations.
erage and penetration. For highly susceptible Applications should be initiated early in the crop-
plants, it may be prudent to routinely spray with ping cycle or before introducing the plants into
either an insecticidal soap or horticultural oil to interiors. Systemic insecticides may be applied as
prevent mealybug populations from reaching either a growing medium drench or granule. It is
outbreak proportions. Also, it is essential to make important to avoid overwatering plants after-
multiple applications when crawlers are present, ward, so that the roots can absorb the active
because eggs will hatch (with the exception of the ingredient. Systemic insecticides, depending on
long-tailed mealybug) over an extended time the type, may be less effective on mealybugs than
period. Insecticides classied as reduced-risk on aphids or whiteies. This may be associated
include insecticidal soaps, horticultural oils, insect with mealybugs not ingesting lethal concentra-
growth regulators, and systemic insecticides. tions of the active ingredient, because they feed
Insecticidal soaps are usually solutions of a within the mesophyll tissues or on plant stems.
synthetic pyrethrin and a plant-safe detergent. As The use of insecticides is the most effective
with oils, the detergent acts as a surfactant and control against the mealybug when applications
spreader for dispersing the pyrethrin evenly, and are timed to coincide with the crawler stage. In
as a mild caustic against the insects. Pyrethrins greenhouse tests, acephate, oxydemeton methyl,
are synthetic analogs of pyrethrum, the natural and kinoprene suppressed populations of both
extract from certain Asteraceae. Caution should mealybug species and prevented crop damage.
be urged with the so-called safe insecticidal Overall reductions of Rhizoecus oridanus
soaps, as some plants are sensitive, particularly (Hambleton) by kinoprene and Ro 103108 were
tender new tissues. comparable to the insecticides acephate and
Horticultural oil, neem oil, and mineral oil are oxamyl (Hamlen 1977). In greenhouse against
effective for mealybug suppression. Horticultural, P.solenenopsis on coleus Solenstemon scutellari-
mineral, or neem oil solutions smother the oides, soil drenching with thiamethoxam, a
insects; so, complete coverage of all sprayed neonicotinoid-based insecticide, provided the
plants is essential. These oils are mixed with highest mealybug control (Willmott 2012).
water and usually a plant-safe detergent for When using pesticides, nymphs are easier to
enhancing the spreading and sticking of the oil. control than mature mealybugs. Insecticides used
The main caution with these oil solutions is that for mealybug control should be rotated to mini-
they should never be applied to plants on hot mize resistance buildup. Insecticides should be
days or in direct sunlight, as to prevent burning of applied using a sprayer that provides complete
tissues. Also, to prevent sun-burning, the chemi- spray coverage of plant. Particularly for mealy-
cal should be applied and allowed to dry in shade. bugs, it is important to totally wet the entire plant,
68 Glasshouse, Greenhouse and Polyhouse Crops 625

including the basal portion. All pesticide labels tion practices and the management program
should always be read and followed. against another pest. The nontarget effects of a
The following insecticides are registered for biological control agent on other benecial or
use against mealybugs in greenhouses: nonpest organisms have to be investigated. The
most suitable host stages may achieve higher
Acephate, Acetamiprid, Azadirachtin, Beauveria rates of parasitism, survival and development,
assiana, Bifenthrin, Buprofezin, Chlorpyrifos, and produce a higher number of progeny consist-
Cyuthrin, Dinotefuran, Fenoxycarb, ing of mainly female parasitoids. The mean tem-
Fenpropathrin, Flonicamid, Imidacloprid, perature of the greenhouse should be maintained
Kinoprene, Parafnic oil, Petroleum oil, at 15 to 30 C for the parasitoids to achieve the
Potassium salts of fatty acids, Spirotetramat, highest developmental rate. Choosing the appro-
Thiamethoxam. priate release time and environmental conditions
can enhance the establishment and effectiveness
of the parasitoid population. The parasitoids can
68.7 Biological control be released as an inundative or seasonal inocula-
tive biological control agent when the mealybug
With some of these chemicals facing phase-out, population level is low. When the mealybug pop-
and with the rising environmental and economic ulation is high, chemical control may be required to
concerns surrounding chemical control tactics, reduce the mealybug population below the dam-
biological control presents a promising alterna- aging level, before the parasitoids can be released.
tive to chemical control for greenhouse ornamen- Insecticides of choice may include insect growth
tal growers. The waxy covering may be the regulators and other compatible chemicals.
reason for the rare occurrence of pathogens and
nematodes as major infesting agents of the
mealybug (Franco et al. 2009). Still, biological 68.7.1 Planococcus citri
control of greenhouse pests through introduction
of natural enemies offers a viable alternative to Biological control agents currently available for
chemical controls. The use of biological control suppression of citrus mealybug populations
agents such as parasitoids and predators has been include the predatory ladybird beetle,
successful in managing mealybugs, primarily cit- Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, commonly referred
rus mealybugs, under specic crop production to as the mealybug destroyer, and the parasit-
systems and interiorscapes. Biological control of oid, Leptomastix dactylopii. The larval stages of
mealybug in greenhouse production relies on the mealybug destroyer resemble mealybug
augmentative releases of parasitoids and preda- adults. L. dactylopii females only attack the third
tors. Biological control agents that are available instar and young adult female life stages. Both
commercially include a variety of tiny parasitic the natural enemies are effective in suppressing
wasps, brown lacewings, green lacewings, and or regulating citrus mealybug populations, and
lady beetles. Some of the commercially available they can be used together under certain systems
mealybug natural enemies are the parasitoids and situations. Doutt (1952) demonstrated that
Anagyrus pseudococci (Girault), Leptomastidea the mealybug P. citri could be successfully con-
abnormis (Girault) and L. dactylopii (Howard) trolled on gardenias by two encyrtid parasites
(all Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) for P.citri, and the (Leptomastix dactytopii and Leptomasiidea
predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant) abnormis) and the ladybird Cryptolaemus
(Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) for many mealybug montrouzieri Mulsant. One of the difculties
species (Chong and Oetting 2007). encountered in the use of a predatory insect as an
Biological control in greenhouse ornamental agent of pest control is that the near eradication
production is characterized by the diversity of of the host, in this case mealybugs, is followed
plants and pests. A biological control program by the disappearance of the predator. This
for one pest must be compatible with the produc- necessitates reintroduction of the natural enemy.
626 K.G. Pillai

The parasitic wasps Leptomastix dactylopii and Leptomastidea abnormis. Successful control was
Anagyrus pseudococci are commercially avail- obtained during summer and autumn, but not in
able for the control of citrus mealybugs. winter when the temperature was 13-17 C.
Generalist predators, such as green lacewings Leptomastix dactylopii was more successful in
Chrysoperla spp., and a mealybug predator summer and Leptomastidea abnormis in autumn.
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri are also marketed as Aggregation of adults of Leptomastix dactylopii
biological control agents of mealybugs. occurred at the level of sample areas, but no spa-
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri is highly effective in tial relationship was found between host density
the control of mealybugs in greenhouses. and percentage of parasitism.
Cryptolaemus has also been often used to control Introduction of parasitoids gave improved
the mealybugs in glasshouses. The temperature biological control of P. citri in a large glasshouse
has to be above 20 C in the glasshouse, and the stocked with a variety of ornamental plants in the
mealybug infestation should be great enough to United Kingdom, supplementing that achieved
provide adequate food for the predator (Panis and by the coccinellid predator Cryptolaemus mon-
Brun 1971). Planococcus citri on gardenias and trouzieri. Following the release of parasitoids
Phenacoccus gossypii on chrysanthemum were Leptomastix dactylopii and Leptomastidea
controlled effectively by the release of C. mon- abnormis, there was evidence of mealybug popu-
trouzieri. One adult per plant of gardenia and one lation regulation on guava and coffee bushes
for each two chrysanthemum plants were with reduced and stabilized mealybug numbers
released. C. montrouzieri was recommended to and stable percentage parasitism. The encyrtid
compliment L. dactylopii for the control of orna- Leptomastidea abnormis was responsible for
mentals in the glasshouse. Good control of P. about 90 % of the parasitism observed; the
citri on Clivia and crotons, and reasonable con- remainder was by another encyrtid, Leptomastix
trol on Pelargonii, Saintpaulia, Cattleya, and dactylopii. The combinations of L. dactylopii and
Pilea were observed (Copland et al. 1985). C. other parasitoids (e.g., L. abnormis) and preda-
montrouzieri was used to control P. citri on the tors (e.g., C. montrouzieri) are most effective
crops grown in glasshouses (Lagowska 1995). In against P. citri in greenhouses (Copland et al.
the green net house, Cryptolaemus, when released 1985; Chong and Oetting 2007). Inoculative
at 20 larvae/plant, was found highly effective in release of ve encyrtid parasitoids, Leptomastidea
clearing the mealybugs P. citri on the ornamen- abnormis, Anagyrus pseudococci, L. dactylopii,
tals red ginger, Heliconia, etc. within 2 months of Chrysoplatycerus splendens (Howard), and
its release in India. In Canada, C. montrouzieri Coccidoxinoides perminutus (Timberlake),
was found in greenhouses on P. citri and P. gos- resulted in the rapid suppression of citrus mealy-
sypii (McLeod 1939). P. citri is the major pest of bug, P. citri, on greenhouse citrus. Several para-
ornamental citrus plants in greenhouses. A sites, L. abnormis, A. pseudococci, and L.
predator:prey ratio of 1:15, in most cases, resulted dactylopii, persisted for periods >20 weeks and
in lower populations of P. citri. When compared maintained the host at reduced densities through
with Nephus reunioni (Fursch), C. montrouzieri delayed density-dependent regulation (Summy
caused a signicant reduction in the mealybug et al. 1986; Van Lenteren and Woets 1988).
population. In most cases, signicant differences
in pest reductions were not detected between C.
montrouzieri and methidathion on potted orange 68.7.2 Pseudococcus viburni syn.
plants (Hamid and Michelakis 1994; 1997). P. afnis and P. obscurus
In a commercial greenhouse in Leiden,
Netherlands, biological control of the pseudococ- Good control of Pseudococcus obscurus (Essig)
cid P. citri on Stephanotis plants was carried out on cacti and Clivia were achieved by using C.
with the coccinellid predators Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Copland et al. 1985). The
montrouzieri and Nephus reunioni, and with the Australian ladybird beetle Cryptolaemus mon-
encyrtid parasitoids Leptomastix dactylopii and trouzieri is used to control the mealybugs in
68 Glasshouse, Greenhouse and Polyhouse Crops 627

glasshouses. A minimum temperature of 21 C 68.7.4 Phenacoccus solenopsis


was needed for the predator to feed and lay eggs.
The time between the introduction of adults into Several parasitoids and predators have been iden-
a house and the next generation of adults was 6 tied that attack P. solenopsis. The incorporation
weeks during summer. It is suggested that under of parasitoids into the management system pro-
greenhouse conditions, predators could maintain vides the opportunity to control pest populations
their populations and provide continuous control at low densities. Aenasius bambawalei (Hayat
of mealybugs for at least 4 months in the year 2009) can be exploited for the control of P. sole-
(Codling 1977). nopsis infesting plants in the greenhouses.
Biological control of mealybugs on various
kinds of ornamental plants in greenhouses at
Antibes in southern France was attempted by References
means of the release of Cryptolaemus montrouz-
ieri and the encyrtid Hungariella pretiosa Chong JH (2005) Biology of the Mealybug Parasitoid,
Anagyrus loecki, and its Potential as a Biological
(Timb.), either alone or together, and of H. pre-
Control Agent of the Madeira Mealybug, Phenacoccus
tiosa with another encyrtid, Pseudaphycus macu- madeirensis. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of
lipennis (Merc). P. maculipennis gave good Georgia, Athens, GA, 186 p
control of Pseudococcus obscurus at tempera- Chong JH, Oetting RD (2007) Specicity of Anagyrus sp.
nov. nr. sinope and Leptomastix dactylopii for six
tures of 20-25 C, even when the mealybugs
mealybug species. BioControl 52:289308
were attended by Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr). Cloyd RA, Dickinson A (2006) Effect of Insecticides on
C. montrouzieri controlled the mealybugs at over Mealybug Destroyer (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and
20 C, but were ineffective at lower temperatures Parasitoid Leptomastix dactylopii (Hymenoptera:
Encyrtidae), Natural Enemies of Citrus Mealybug
or in the presence of ant attendants. C. montrouz-
(Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). J Econ Entomol
ieri gave good control of Pseudococcus afnis 99(5):15961604
(Maskell) on Streptocarpus hybridus, citrus, Codling A (1977) Biological control of mealybug. Nat
Passiora, potato, and coffee in glasshouses Cact Succ J 32(2):3638
Copland MJW (1983) Temperature constraints in the con-
(Copland 1983). C. montrouzieri was used to
trol of mealybug and scale insects. Bull SROP
control the coccid pests in the glasshouses of the 6(3):142145
botanic garden in Lublin, Poland (Golan and Copland MJW, Tingle CCD, Saynor M, Panis A (1985)
Grska-Drabik 2004). In glasshouses, good con- Biology of glasshouse mealybugs and their predators
and parasitoids. In: Hussey NW, Scopes NEA (eds)
trol was achieved against the obscure mealybug
Biological pest control: the glasshouse experience.
P. viburni by C. montrouzieri, irrespective of the Branford Press, Poole, pp 8286
hairiness of the plant species. The plants used Doutt RL (1952) Biological control of Planococcus citri
include Citrus limon, Coffeae arabica, on commercial greenhouse -stephanotis. J Econ
Entomol 45(2):343344
Lycopersicon esculentum, Passiora caerulea,
Franco JC, Zada A, Mendel Z (2009) Novel approaches
Solanum tuberosum, and Streptocarpus sp. for the management of mealybug pests. In: I. Ishaaya
(Heidari 1999). and A.R. Horowitz (eds) Biorational control of arthro-
pod pests. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 233278
Golan K, Grska-Drabik E (2004) The scale insects of
some tropical fruit plants in greenhouses of Botanical
68.7.3 Phenacoccus madeirensis Garden in Lublin (Poland). Latvian J Agron 7:3942
Hamid HA, Michelakis S (1994) The importance of
Anagyrus loecki (Noyes and Menezes) Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant (Col.,
Coccinellidae) in the control of the citrus mealybug
(Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) is a parasitoid of the
Planococcus citri (Homoptera: Coccoidea) under spe-
Madeira mealybug P.madeirensis in the green- cic conditions. J Appl Entomol 118:1722
house ornamental production in Georgia (Chong Hamid HA, Michelakis SE (1997) The use of
2005). Anagyrus sinope sp. nr is a highly host- Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant) for the control
of Planococcus citri (Risso) in Crete Greece. Bull
specic parasitoid that develops only in P. madei-
OILB/SROP 20:712
rensis (Chong and Oetting 2007).
628 K.G. Pillai

Hamlen RA (1977) Laboratory and greenhouse evalua- Panis A, Brun J (1971) Trial of biological control against
tions of insecticides and insect growth regulators for three species of Pseudococcidae (Homoptera,
control of foliar and root infesting mealybugs. J Econ Coccoidea) in greenhouses of ornamental plants.
Entomol 70(2):211214 Revue de Zool Agricole 70:4247
Hayat M (2009) Description of a new species of Aenasius Summy KR, French JV, Hart WG (1986) Citrus mealybug
Walker (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), parasitoid of the (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) on greenhouse citrus:
mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley Homoptera: density-dependent regulation by an encyrtid parasite
Pseudococcidae ) in India. Biosystematica 3:2126 complex. J Econ Entomol 79(4):891985
Heidari M (1999) Inuence of host-plant physical defenses Van Lenteren JC, Woets JV (1988) Biological and inte-
on the searching behaviour and efcacy of two cocci- grated pest control in greenhouses. Annu Rev Entomol
nellid predators of the obscure mealybug, Pseudococcus 33(1):239269
vibruni (Signoret). Entomologica 33:397402 Waterworth RA, Redak RA, Millar JG (2011) Pheromone-
Lain HM, Parrella MP (2004) Mealybug species baited traps for assessment of seasonal activity and
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) found on ornamental population densities of mealybug species (Hemiptera:
crops in California nursery production. Proc Entomol Pseudococcidae) in nurseries producing ornamental
Soc Wash 106:475477 plants. J Econ Entomol 104(2):555565
Lagowska B (1995) The biological control perspective of Willmott AL (2012) Efcacy of systemic insecticides
scale insects (Homoptera, Coccinea) on ornamental against the citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri, and
plants in glasshouses. Wiadomosci Entomologiczne pesticide mixtures against the western ower thrips,
14:510 Frankliniella occidentalis, in protected environ-
McLeod JH (1939) Biological control of greenhouse ments. Masters thesis. Kansas State University,
insect pests. Rep Entomol Soc Ont 70:6268 Manhattan, KS
Root Mealybugs
69
Maicykutty Mathew and M. Mani

Root mealybugs are several small species of eld crops. The species belonging to genera
mealybugs found below the soil surface, and Geococcus, Rhizoecus, Xenococcus,
feed on root and root hairs in numerous plants. Chorizococcus, Spilococcus, Spinococcus and
They are also called soil mealybugs and subter- Chnaurococcus are known to roots of the
ranean mealybugs. Infestations frequently are plants (Table 69.1).
not detected as the pests occur in the soil, and
populations are quite slow to develop, with
36 months occurring before infestations are
easily visible. Careful examination of infested 69.1 Important Root Mealybug
roots will reveal white, cotton-like masses. Species
These white masses contain both mature
females and eggs. Infected plants become 69.1.1 Gonococcus coffeae
wilted and stunted with foliar yellowing or
chlorosis. They are oval shaped (1/16 to 3/16 Geococcus coffeae Green can be easily be distin-
of an inch long) that look like they have been guished by the pair of stout dorsal spines situated
covered by our. Because they are white or on the head (Green 1933). Geococcus coffeae
light grey in colour, they often resemble small was known to infest sweet potato Ipomoea bata-
grains of rice. These mealybugs have a thin, tas in Tamil Nadu, India (Williams 1985) and
uniform waxy coating and lack the terminal also several other plants such as Theobroma
wax laments typical of their foliar-feeding cacao, Coffea spp., ornamentals, pine apple, and
relatives. Root mealybugs are slow moving, palms (Ben-Dov 1994).
sac-like mealybugs with pronounced crosswise
grooves. They do not have laments surround-
ing their body like many of the foliar feeding 69.1.2 Geococcus citrinus
mealybugs. Root mealybugs pose serious prob-
lem to potted and greenhouse plants and also Geococcus citrinus is a ground mealybug that
lives in the soil and damages the root of citrus in

M. Mathew (*)
Kerala Agricultural University, Trichur, India
e-mail: maycypm@yahoo.co.in
M. Mani
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research,
Bangalore 560089, India

Springer India 2016 629


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_69
630 M. Mathew and M. Mani

Table 69.1 List of other root mealybugs on different host plants in different countries
Mealybug species Plants Country
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) Pigeon pea & groundnut South India
Pineapple Many countries
Dysmicoccus texensis (Tinsley) Coffee Espirito Santo
Cassava Paraguay, Bolivia & Brazil
Dysmicoccus vaccinii sp. n. Blueberries USA
Ferrisia virgata (Ckll.) Parthenium hysterophorus India
Geococcus johorensis Williams Oil palm Johore & Malaya
Geococcus lawrencei Williams Asplenium nidus Solomon Islands
Geococcus oryzae Kuwana Oryza sativa Japan & Ceylon
Phenacoccus salviacus Moghaddam Salvia bracteata Iran
Phenacoccus hordei (Lindeman) Grasses, alfalfa, barley, clover, rye & European countries
wheat
Planococcoides robustus Ezzat & Mango India
McConnell
Planococcus citri (Risso) Coffee Kenya/East Africa
Citrus Crete
Planococcus cryptus Hempel Coffee Brazil
Planococcus cus Signoret Grapevine South Africa
Planococcus fungicola sp. nov. Coffee Kenya
Pseudococcus eriocerei Williams Cacti Argentina
Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) Plum Chile
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel Coffee Espirito Santo
Polystomophora arakensis Atraphaxis sp. Iran
Moghaddam
Rhizoecus maasbachi Jansen Segeretia theezans Netherlands
Michelis sp. China
Segeretia sp. England
Rhizoecus amorphophalli Betrem Amorphophallus variabilis Java
Amorphophallus sp. India
Gingiber ofcinale
Diosorea elephantipes
Curcuma domestica
Amorphophallus variabilis Caroline Islands
Colocasia esculenta, Curcuma longa Philippines
and Kaempferia galangal
Rhizoecus theae sp.n. Tea Japan
(continued)
69 Root Mealybugs 631

Table 69.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Plants Country
Rhizoecus hibisci Kawai & Takagi Hibiscus rosasinensis Japan
Coffee Hawaii
Tea, bonsai plant Serissa foetida, East and southeast Asia, Puerto
ornamentals: Cuphea, Hibiscus Rico, Florida and Hawaii, Italy
rosa-sinensis, Nerium, Oleander and the Netherlands
largonium, Rhododendron, bonsais
like, Ligustrum ovalifolium, Punica
granatum, Segeretia theezans, Ulmus
parviora, Zelkova serrata, foliage
plants Calathea, Diffenbachia, cus,
and various members of Araceae and
dwarf Bermuda grass
Rhizoecus kondonis Kuw. Citrus Japan
Rhizoecus cynodontis Green Cynodon dactylon India
Rhizoecus arabicus Hambleton Coffee, Gasteranthus atratus & other Colombia, Costa Rica &
ornamental plants Florida
Rhizoecus kondonis Kuw. Citrus China
Rhizoecus aloes sp. Nov Aloe glauca UK
Ripersia speciosa De Lotto Coreopsis sp. Congo
Xenococcus annandalei Silvestri Grapes India

China and orange in Izu peninsula, Shizuoka-


ken and Japan. It has been reported on the roots
of betel vine from Tamil Nadu (India)
(Muthukrishnan et al. 1958). This species
became an important pest of Nendran variety of
banana in Kerala. A total of 28 collateral hosts
were recorded for Geococcus citrinus in banana
ecosystem (Abraham et al. 2000; Smitha et al.
2005).

Adult females on the roots


69.1.3 Rhizoecus hibisci

Potted palms and other slow-growing plants are


more susceptible to infestation by root mealybug 69.1.4 Rhizoecus americanus
Rhizoecus hibisci Kawai & Takagi because they
require lengthy bench time to attain marketable Rhizoecus americanus Ferris is a soft-bodied,
size. Rhizoecus hibisci have been found on palms, sucking insect that attacks the tips of roots. It is
calathea, and Serrisa spp. very common in Florida and other southern
states. However, if shipped in plants, it continues
632 M. Mathew and M. Mani

to thrive indoors and in greenhouses. These crea- ignored as insignicant or misidentied as


tures are dangerous to the plants and are often mycorrhiza.

Roots of Euphorbia squarrosa Rhizoecus americanus on


infested with mealybugs African Violets

69.1.5 Rhizoecus falciper African violet, although it is also known to infest


Achillea, Arctostaphylos, Geum, and Polygala.
The ground mealybug R. falciper Kunckel d Pritchards mealybug causes devitalization, foli-
Herculais was described in France, and occurs in age deterioration, and even death of its host plant.
scattered locations across the United States. The When infested African violets are irrigated,
ground mealybug feeds on the roots of anemone, Pritchards mealybugs crawl out of the drainage
chrysanthemum, gladiolus, iris, and numerous holes and spread throughout the greenhouse. Eggs
other owers, shrubs, and ornamental grasses. At are laid in a loose ovisac in clusters of at least six
times, the ground mealybug becomes abundant eggs. All stages can be found on the roots.
enough to damage its host.

69.1.7 Rhizoecus maasbachi

Rhizoecus maasbachi Jansen is known to infest


bonsai plants of Sageretia spp. in China. This
species lives hidden on root hairs and detection
of small population is difcult. Rhizoecus hibisci
and R. maasbachi are the only two species regu-
larly detected on Chinese bonsai and could be
confused with one another. In R. maasbachi, eyes
are present and the antennae are 6-segmented. In
R. hibisci, the eyes are absent and antennae are
5-segmented (Jansen 2003).

69.1.8 Rhizoecus amorphophalli


Rhizoecus falcifer
Rhizoecus amorphophalli Betrem was recorded
on roots of elephant foot yam, Amorphophallus
69.1.6 Rhizoecus pritchardi sp. from Trivandrum, Kerala (India) and roots of
ginger Zingiber ofcinale from Calicut,
Pritchards mealybug Rhizoecus pritchardi Dioscorea elephantipes from Goa, and rhizomes
Mckenzie is found across the United States. of Curcuma domestica Zingiberaceae) from
Pritchards mealybug has become a serious pest of Kohlapur, Maharashtra stored for seed purpose.
69 Root Mealybugs 633

69.1.9 Rhizoecus cocois bugs species namely Planococcus sp.,


Planococcus citri (Risso), P. lilacinus Cockerell,
Rhizoecus cocois Williams was reported from Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) and Ferrisia
Kazhakkoottam, Kerala infesting coconut palms. virgata (Cockerell) are known to infest the roots
Infested young palms show yellowing and loss of and basal region of stem of black pepper vines
vigour and discolouration of the roots at the point (Piper nigrum) (Ventataramaiah and Rehman
of feeding resulting in the drying up of such 1989; Devasahayam et al. 2010).
roots. The adult female is subglobular, cream
coloured and enclosed within a loose jacket of
pure white cottony felt (Nair et al. 1980). 69.1.13 Planococcoides robustus

Planococcoides robustus sp.nr. was found infest-


69.1.10 Rhizoecus kondonis ing roots of mango, grapes and the weed plant
Coniza ambigua in the Kolar district of Karnataka,
Rhizoecus kondonis Kuwana is a subterranean India. Ants were observed to carry the mealy-
pest of alfalfa (lucerne), prunes (plums, Prunus bugs. The affected plants showing desiccation
domestica) and other crops primarily in the and leaf fall survived (Puttarudriah and
Sacramento Valley of California. Root feeding by Eswaramurthy 1976).
the mealybug results in chlorotic, stunted lucerne
plants. Rhizoecus kondonis has three generations
per year with peaks in abundance in July-August, 69.1.14 Xenococcus annandalei
December-January and March-April.
Signicantly more R. kondonis were found 15.2 The grape root mealybug Xenococcus annanda-
45.7 cm deep in the soil (averaging 8.3/1240 cm lei Silvestri in India also known to cause damage
superscript three soil core samples) compared occasionally by sucking the sap from roots, and
with depths of 015.2 cm (averaging 2.2/sample). the affected vines show reduced vigour, shorten-
All ten lucerne varieties were examined for sus- ing of fruit bearing canes and reduction in size of
ceptibility to this insect and found to be equally fruit bunches and yield.
susceptible (Godfrey and Pickel 1998).

69.1.15 Paraputo sp.


69.1.11 Dysmicoccus brevipes
Mulberry plantations in hilly areas of Northern
Dysmicoccus brevipes Cockerell is common on parts of India such as Darjeeling and Kalimpong
the roots of pineapple, and large colonies develop are being infested by root mealybug, Paraputo
on the stems just above ground level. It is associ- sp. (Pseudococcidae: Homoptera) causing con-
ated with pineapple wilt. It was also found on the siderable damage (Mukhopadhyay et al. 2010).
roots of the groundnut. It lives in colonies under-
ground, and few may be seen on foliage. They
feed on nodules and cut off the nutrient supply to 69.1.16 Phenacoccus parvus
plants (Singh et al. 1986).
Phenacoccus parvus Morrison was recorded
feeding mainly on collar region and subterranean
69.1.12 Pepper Root Mealybugs plant parts of the ornamental China aster in India.
About 25 % of the plants were infested making
Mealybugs are major insect pests of black pepper the plant stunted without bearing owers (Sridhar
plantations in southern parts of India. Five mealy- et al. 2012).
634 M. Mathew and M. Mani

69.1.17 Chryseococcus arecae per plant was recorded in Gedeo zone while the
lowest infestation of three mealybugs per plant
The golden root mealybug, Chryseococcus are- was recorded in Yem district. Knowledge about
cae Maskell is a native of New Zealand. It was the biology and distribution of this species has
found in Britain and can be witnessed on the paramount importance in devising proper man-
roots of outdoor plants all year round. Golden agement. Enset plants infested with mealybugs
root mealybug is a sap feeding insect that feeds have a retarded growth and dried lateral leaves.
on the roots of a wide variety of plants, although The insects attack all plant age groups but symp-
it has only been found on Meconopsis and toms are more severe on 2 to 4 years old enset
Primula in UK. Mealybug infestations have been plants. Enset root mealybugs are found on roots
noticed on plants lacking vigour. and corms. However, during periods of extreme
drought the mealybugs tend to move towards the
corm when some of the roots drought. The dis-
persal mechanism of enset root mealybugs is
facilitated by movement of infested suckers, farm
implements during cultivation, repeated trans-
planting operations and association with ants.
The population density of the mealybugs was sig-
nicantly (P < 0.05) higher on the roots than the
corms. Enset root mealybugs were found up to a
soil depth of 60 cm and up to 80 cm from the
corm. However, root density as well as mealybug
population numbers decreased with increasing
soil depth. About 99 % of the mealybugs and
Chryseococcus arecae 96 % of the roots were collected within the upper
40 cm soil layer. In addition, about 90 % of the
mealybugs were found within a 60-cm radius
from the plant (Addis et al. 2008, 2010).
69.1.18 The Enset Root Mealybug
Cataenococcus ensete
69.2 Damage
Enset (Ensete ventricosum) was domesticated in
Ethiopia several hundred years ago, and is now There can be several generations of the root
the staple food crop for over 15 million Ethiopians mealybugs throughout the year and numbers can
living in the highlands of southern Ethiopia. The multiply under favourable conditions. With
enset root mealybug Cataenococcus ensete severe infestations, root mealybugs can be found
Williams and Matile-Ferrero is a major pest in on the soil surface at the stem base. It is very dif-
the enset growing regions of southern Ethiopia. cult to detect symptoms of root mealybugs on
Infestation was high in Amaro, Gedeo, Sidama the plant. White, cottony-like masses containing
and Bench districts with 100, 67, 61 and 57 % egg-laying females and/or eggs are normally vis-
incidence respectively. Low mealybug incidence ible on the outside of the root mass when an
was recorded in Gurage, Kembata Tembaro, infested plant is lifted. Slow plant growth and
Hadyia zones and Yem districts. More than 30 % leaf deterioration may be signs of the presence of
of the enset farms were infested with the mealy- the pest. Root-bound or under environmental or
bugs. The highest infestation of 81 mealybugs nutritional stress, the plants are more susceptible
69 Root Mealybugs 635

to attack. Once established in the greenhouse, The adults and nymphs of Geococcus suck sap
root mealybugs may spread as crawlers from from the lateral roots of banana colonizing at the
plant to plant as the water moves out of the drain- junction of laterals with main root resulting in
age holes to nearby plants and in plant debris. It drying up of such roots. Yellowing and narrowing
is mainly potted plants (especially bonsai plants) of leaves, general weakening of the plant, reduc-
that are concerned during import inspections. tion in bunch weight, etc. were the observed
The pot should be removed and roots examined symptoms. Geococcus citrinus occurs seriously
for waxy secretions. In case of heavy infesta- on banana roots in reclaimed paddy elds. G. cof-
tions, crawlers may be observed on the soil sur- feae was also associated with banana grown in
face. The mealybugs may be found particularly in uplands.
the new feeder roots in the upper layer of the soil. The adults and immature stages of Rhizoecus
The resulting damage sties the ability of roots to hibisci feed on plant roots particularly new roots
absorb water and nutrients. The only outward in the upper layer of soil reducing water and
sign of root mealybug feeding may be a decline nutrient uptake by host. Feeding reduces plant
in the health of infested plants. When plants are growth resulting in shrivelling and crinkling.
removed from the pot, the whitish mealybugs Leaves wilt, become pale and turn yellow or
feeding on the roots are then observed. If the grey; alternatively they can become soft, translu-
plant seems to be declining in health because it cent and brown. Flowers may not be produced.
has yellow foliage or slow growth or is stunted Mealy bugs (Planococcus sp., P. citri, P.
for what seems to be no particular reason, then it lilacinus, Dysmicoccus brevipes and Ferrisia vir-
is to be looked for something that could be lurk- gata) were found infesting the roots and basal
ing below feeding on the plants root system. In region of stem of black pepper vines (Piper
case there are mealybugs on bonsai trees, leaves nigrum). Infested plants show slow or poor
may be pale (sometimes greyish) or wilted, growth. Leaves wilt, become pale or turn yellow
despite regular fertilizer and watering. Maybe the or grey. Wax deposit is seen around the roots, on
plant growth has slowed down and/or owering the soil or on the side of the pots. The infestation
has ceased. In severe cases, the leaves may be is generally severe during the post monsoon. The
misshapen. Although they occur throughout the root mealy bug affects the aerial parts of the black
roots, they are most obvious along the edges. pepper vines such as the tender shoots, leaves and
berries (Devasahayam et al. 2010).
Parputo sp. cause appreciable damage to
mulberry directly by sucking the sap and indi-
rectly by making way for some fungal infection,
leading to rotting of the root and ultimately
death of the plants. The infested mulberry plants
show vulnerability to the attack of various fun-
gal pathogens such as Fusarium solani,
Phomopsis mori and Colletotrichum gloeospo-
rioides. Due to this, decaying of bark portion of
root and stem occurs with severe anthracnose
disease. Finally, it results in the death of such
severely affected mulberry plants (Biswas et al.
Mealybugs on the roots
2002).
636 M. Mathew and M. Mani

Symptoms of banana root mealy bug infestation on banana

Roots of banana infested with mealybugs Banana plants infested with root mealybugs

69.2.1 Mode of Spread causing considerable damage. It remains in the


root-zone and adjacent to stump portion below the
Under moist conditions, young root mealybugs soil surface up to 20 cm deep, sucks sap and secrets
or nymphs are active. They move short distances honey dew, thus inviting the occurrence of several
to adjacent plants. They may crawl from pot to fungi on the plants. Due to sucking root becomes
pot via drainage holes. They are slow moving in stunted, normal growth ceases and leaves become
irrigation water thereby facilitating the spread. yellow and appear to be wilting (Das et al. 2004).
However their dispersal potential is usually lim-
ited. Infestations often begin with the purchase of
infested plant material. 69.2.3 Natural Enemies

There is poor natural enemy complex, particu-


69.2.2 Seasonal Development larly natural predators or parasites on root mealy-
bugs. Two predators namely Scymnus sp.
Banana root mealybugs: The maximum popula- (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera) were found feeding
tion of Geococcus spp. was observed within on G. citrinus (Smitha and Mathew 2010a).
2040 cm radius followed by 4060 cm. In the Mathew et al. (2010) reported the fungal patho-
case of vertical distribution, more mealybugs gen, Paecilomyces lilacinus on Geococcus spp. It
were collected within 20 cm depth. The popula- was pathogenic to both Geococcus coffeae and
tion increased with the commencement of south- G. citrinus (Smitha and Mathew 2011) and also
west monsoon in June and reached a peak in July, isolated Hirsutella sp. infecting G. citrinus. The
followed by a decline in September, reaching a larvae of Spalgis sp. were observed to predate on
lower level in January and remained low up to pepper root mealybug colonies (Planococcus sp.,
May (Smitha and Mathew 2010a). P. citri, P. lilacinus, Dysmicoccus brevipes and
Mulberry root mealybugs: Plantations in hill Ferrisia virgata) (Devasahayam et al. 2010;
are being infested by root mealybug Paraputo sp. Ventataramaiah and Rehman 1989).
69 Root Mealybugs 637

Larva of Scymnus sp. Adult Scymnus

69.3 Management Do not allow water from infested areas to run


onto clean areas.
It is very difcult to detect and control root Remove alternate host plants from around the
mealybugs. Every effort should be made to pre- greenhouse, or control mealybugs on them.
vent their spread and establishment. Pesticides Use clean pots and soil; if infested, wash pots
applied as dips, drenches, or granules are more with soap and water.
effective for root mealybug control than are foliar Keep the growing area clean of plant debris.
sprays. First, isolate the affected plants, especially if
they share a common watering tray with other,
healthy plants. Although soil mealy bugs do
69.3.1 Pot Culture Plants not spread easily, they will travel over moist
surfaces.
Infestations usually begin with new plant Root mealybugs can be spread by irrigation
material. Inspect roots of newly purchased water, re-use of previously infested pots, re-
plants by removing them from their pots. use of contaminated media, and crawlers
Inspect roots of suspected plants, especially moving from infested plants to other plants.
slow growing ones. Infestation of greenhouse bench plants by root
Avoid pot-bound plants by re-potting when mealybugs can occur by introducing nursery
necessary. stock that was already infested when pur-
Use pots with inner coatings of copper chased or from crawlers that move in from
hydroxide which prevents root matting and host plants near the greenhouse.
thereby minimizes root mealybug infesta- For root mealybug in pots, remove all soil and
tions. Separate pots from the ground on raised destroy it. Wash the roots thoroughly and treat
benches or with plastic lm over the soil. (eventually immersing the whole plant) with
Palm roots in the pot not treated with copper the above mentioned insecticide, letting the
hydroxide (right) are more compacted and roots dry after treatment and before replanting
infested with mealybugs (Hara et al. 2001). in completely fresh, sterilized soil. Always
cleanse and sterilize frames and all other items
638 M. Mathew and M. Mani

used when replanting. Regular applications in a diluted chlorpyriphos solution (1 pint per
(weekly for several weeks) of insecticide 100 gal) for about 30 s with slight agitation is
watered into the soil are also effective; it is nearly twice as effective as dipping the plant
also possible to immerse the plant pot up to while still in its pot. Imidacloprid, which can
the top of the soil in a bucket of insecticide. be applied only as a drench and incorporated
A promising alternative to chemical treat- with a surfactant or wetting agent to ensure
ments has been found in the use of thorough distribution of solution in the potting
Diatomaceous Earth, a fully inert, non-vola- medium, can also signicantly reduce the
tile substance that has proven effective in number of individuals in an infestation (Hata
eradicating certain insect pests. Strictly speak- et al. 1996).
ing, Diatomaceous Earth is not an insecticide. Moth ball: As a preventative measure, moth
It is made from the skeletal remains of dia- balls (paradichlorobenzene), added to the pot-
toms, a microscopic form of algae. When pro- ting mix, seem to discourage infestation by
cessed into Diatomaceous Earth, these skeletal root mealy bug, and probably discourages
remains form razor-sharp particles which cut other insects. However, the chemicals in the
into the bodies of small insects. While eradi- moth balls can cause damage to plastic plant
cating the insects, Diatomaceous Earth does pots and are best used with clay pots.
not harm African Violets. To treat for soil Traditionally, the only effective treatment for
mealy bugs, repot the African Violet in a soil soil mealybugs (R. amercanus) has been to
that has been mixed with Diatomaceous Earth. spray the soil with acephate (as directed on the
Use about one tablespoon per one litre of soil. label) or with malathion (1 teaspoon of
Pasteurize soil before re-potting. To make soil Malathion 50 per 4 l of lukewarm water).
uninhabitable for future mealy bug infesta- While this treatment does work, it usually
tions, mix about one fourth tablespoon of takes several applications over a period of
Diatomaceous Earth with every litre of soil. days. Moreover, there is usually some risk to
Hot-water dips are as effective as insecticides plants when using any chemical treatment.
against mealybugs. Submerging the potted
palms in water held at 120 F (49 C) until the
internal root ball temperature reached 115 F
(46 C) was 100 % effective in killing root 69.3.2 Field Conditions
mealybugs. Drenching potted palm roots in
hot water at 120 F for 15 min will not only Application of sodium silicate and calcium oxide at
control mealybugs but will also eliminate bur- the time of planting effectively reduced the popula-
rowing nematodes. If an infestation is found tion of banana root mealybug, G. citrinus.
(Rhizoecus hibisci), hot water treatment of Drenching of the chemical insecticides, chlorpyri-
root balls is very effective (Hu et al. 1996). phos at 0.05 % at monthly intervals, reduced the
Chemical control of root mealybugs requires root mealybug population. Among the combina-
saturation of the root ball and potting medium tions, without synthetic insecticides, sodium sili-
to a degree that allows the pesticide to pene- cate alone and its combination with neem seed
trate the pests white, waxy secretion. Dipping kernel extract (NSKE) and Cephalosporium leca-
or drenching with liquid insecticide is more nii Zimm, were effective in reducing the mealybug
effective than applying a granular formula- population at sixth and seventh month of the crop.
tion. Chlorpyriphos, applied twice as a drench Application of chlorpyriphos gave the highest ben-
or dip at 2-week intervals controls coffee root et--cost ratio of 2.46 followed by sodium silicate
mealybug; however, it may take 46 months (2.30) (Smitha and Mathew 2010b). Application of
before the cottony, waxy secretions deterio- neonicotinoids, which include imidacloprid, thia-
rate completely. In the dip method, submerg- methoxam, thiocloprid, by way of soil drench can
ing the plants entire root ball without the pot also be tried against root mealybugs in general.
69 Root Mealybugs 639

Drenching the affected vines with about 69.3.3 Biological Control


0.075 % chlorpyriphos is effective in controlling
the pepper root mealybug infestation in India. If Smitha and Mathew (2010b) found
the infestation persists, then drenching may have Cephalosporium lecanii Zimmerman as the best
to be repeated after 2030 days, Adequate care among the three fungi screened, namely,
should be taken to ensure that the insecticide Beauveria bassiana Balsomo, Hirsutella sp. and
solution percolates down to the roots while Cephalosporium lecanii. Entomopathogenic
drenching the vines. Farmers should not trans- nematodes (EPNs) have potential for biological
plant infested nursery plants in the eld and mild pest control and have been successfully used in
infestations should be controlled in the nursery several countries in soil and cryptic pests control,
itself. Ploughing the interspaces in black pepper as for example the coffee root mealybug
gardens and removal of weeds also help in lower- Dysmicoccus texensis (Tinsley). Aqueous
ing the level of pest population. The mango root suspension of Heterorhabditis on coffee root was
mealybug Planococcoides robustus sp.nr. was more efcient with 70 % control efciency when
controlled by application of disulfoton granules compared with thiamethoxam (Alves et al. 2009).
at monthly intervals and watering weekly. The
affected plants showing desiccation and leaf fall
had survived (Puttarudriah and Eswaramurthy 69.3.4 Phytosanitary Risk
1976).
Under green house and farmers eld condi- R. hibisci has spread from Asia to USA (Hawaii
tions, insecticides like diazinon 60 % EC and and Florida) and has established in some orna-
chlorpyriphos 48 % EC caused at least 98 % mor- mental glasshouses in Europe. Though there are
tality of enset mealybug Catenococcus ensete also European species of Rhizoecus with similar
both under eld and green house conditions biology, R. hibisci is a potentially serious pest in
(Tadesse et al. 2010a). Seed water suspension of the EPPO region, particularly on glasshouse pot
Millettia ferruginea at 10 % was toxic to C. plants. Moreover, it has signicance as an indica-
ensete, causing 66 % mortality. However, the tor that pot plants (especially bonsai plants) pro-
efcacy was inferior to diazinon application in duced in eastern Asia, and exported to the EPPO
the pot and dipping treatments (Tadesse et al. region, have not been grown under adequately
2010b). Citronella oil at 5 % performed better controlled conditions (as dened for example in
towards controlling mulberry root mealybug EU 2000), and may accordingly be infested by
Paraputo sp. followed by 5 % neem oil and 55 other non-European pests. Rhizoecus hibisci was
neem leaf extract, without any adverse effect on added in 2001 to the EPPO A2 list of regulated
silkworm rearing (Anonymous 2011). Biswas pests. Nurseries producing pot plants for export
et al. (2002) reported that both carbofuran and to the EPPO region should maintain good stan-
endosulfan were effective in controlling mul- dards of hygiene, and in particular should respect
berry root mealybug for longer period. Diazinon, EPPO Standard PM 3/54 growing plants in grow-
oxamyl and granules of aldicarb are recom- ing medium prior to export (OEPP/EPPO 1994).
mended for control of Rhizoecus arabicus Bonsai plants for export to the EPPO region
Hambleton (Hamon 1982). Phyrinex 48 % EC should respect the requirements set out in EU
and Phostoxin tablet had provided better control (2000) or equivalent requirements. Consignments
of root mealybug (Paraputo sp.) than the other of containerized host species from areas where R.
insecticides. Phostoxin tablets and Phyrinex hibisci occurs should have containers removed
48 % EC resulted in mean pseudostem circum- and the roots inspected. Montanucci (2010)
ference increases of 23.23 and 32.34 cm, and in described a safe and inexpensive procedure for
mean plant height increases of 71.09 and elimination of root mealybugs (genus Rhizoecus)
58.11 cm, respectively, over the control (Bekele from a small cactus collection. The procedure
2001). prevents re-infestation by taking advantage of the
640 M. Mathew and M. Mani

fact that the root mealybug females and nymphs Green EE (1933) Notes on some Coccoidae from Surinam,
Dutch-Guiana, with descriptions ofnew species.
are wingless and must crawl to potted plants to
Stylops J Taxon Entomol 2:4958
become established. The procedure is expected to Hamon AB (1982) Rhizoecus arabicus Hambleton, a root
permanently eradicate rather than simply control mealybug in Florida (Homoptera: Coccoidea:
these pests. Pseudococcidae). Entomology Circular, Division of
Plant Industry, Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services, 238, 2 p
Hara AH, Nino-DuPonte RY, Jacobsen CM (2001) Root
References mealybugs ofquarantine signicance in Hawaii.
Cooperative Extension Service, CTAHR, University
Abraham V, Ajith CB, Priyamol S (2000) Krishiyankanam, of Hawaii, Manoa
6 (4): 56 Nair, M.R.G.K., Visalakshi, A. and Koshy, Hata TY, Hara AH, Hu BKS (1996) Use of a systemic
G. 1980. A new root infesting mealybug of coconut. insecticide granule against root mealybugs, Hawaii.
Entomon 5: 245246. In: Arthropod management tests, Vol. 21, p.382.
Addis T, Azerefegne F, Blomme G (2008) Density and Entomological Society of America, Lanham
distribution of enset root mealybugs on enset. Afr Hu BKS, Hara AH, Hata TY (1996) Hot water as a poten-
Crop Sci J 16(1):6774 tial treatment against root mealybugs, Hawaii, 1995.
Addis T, Azerefegne F, Alemu T, Lemawork S, Tadesse E, In: Arthropod Management Tests, Vol. 21, pp. 382
Gemu M, Blomme G (2010) Biology, geographical 383. Entomological Society of America, Lanham
distribution, prevention and control of enset root Jansen MGM (2003) A new species of Rhizoecus on bon-
mealybug, Cataenococcus ensete sai trees. Tijdschrift voor Entomol 146:297300
(Homoptera:Pseudococcidae) in Ethiopia. (Special Mathew MP, Beena S, Sowmya KC, Aipe KC (2010)
Issue: Bananas, Plantains and ensete II.). Tree and Studies on Paecilomyces lilacinus, an entomopatho-
Forestry Science and. Biotechnology 4(1):3946 gen on Root mealy bug of Banana in Global confer-
Alves VS, Moino Junior A, Santa-Cecilia LVC, Rohde C, ence on banana organized by AIPPUB, ICAR,
da Silva MAT (2009) Revista Brasileira de Bioversity International and NRCB, Trichy, during
Entomologia 53(1):139143 1013 December 2010
Anonymous (2011) Directory of concluded projects Montanucci RR (2010) A safe procedure for eradicating
(1943 2010). Central Sericultural Research and root mealybugs from a cactus collection. Cactus Succ
Training Institute, Berhampore, 226p J 82(4):184186
Bekele T (2001) Insecticidal screening against enset root Mukhopadhyay SK, Das D, Santha Kumar MV, Das NK,
mealybug, Paraputo spp. Agric Topia 16(2):23 Mondal K, Bajpai AK (2010) Weather based fore-
Ben-Dov Y (1994) A Systematic Catalogue of the warning of root mealybug, Paraputo sp. in mulberry of
Mealybugs of the World (Insecta: Homoptera: Kalimpong hills. J Plant Protect Sci 2(2):8587
Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae and Putoidea) with data Muthukrishnan TS, Nagaraja Rao KR, Subramanian TR,
on geographical distribution, host plants, biology and Janaki IP, Abraham EV (1958) Brief notes on a few
economic importance. Intercept Limited, Andover crop pests noted for the rst time in Madras. Madras
(GB) 686 p Agric J 45:363364
Biswas S, Das D, Chattopadhyay S, Das SK, Mondal K Nair MRGK, Visalakshi A, Koshy G (1980) A new root-
(2002) Root mealybug (Paraputo sp.) of mulberry in infesting mealy bug of coconut. Entomon
Darjeeling hills: Its severity, Biology and Control. 5(3):245246
Sericologia 42(1):3948 OEPP/EPPO (1994) EPPO Standard PM 3/54 Growing
Das D, Biswas S, Sarkar S, Das SK, Chakrabarti (2004) plants in growing medium prior to export. Bull OEPP/
Population dynamics of the root mealybug, Paraputo EPPO Bull 24:326327
sp. on mulberry in the hills of Darjeeling. Sericologia Puttarudriah M, Eswaramurthy (1976) Planococcoides
44(1):95100 sp.nr. robustus, a mango root mealybug and its control.
Devasahayam S, Abdulla Koya KM, Ananaraj M, Thomas Curr Res 5(12):205207
T, Preethi N (2010) Distribution and ecology of root Singh TVK, Goud TR, Azam KM (1986) Attack of mealy-
mealybugs associated with black pepper (Piper bug, Dysmicoccus breviceps on groundnut. Indian
nigrum L.) in Karnataka and Kerala, India. Entomon J Entomol 48(3):358
34(3):147154 Smitha MS, Mathew MP (2010a) Population dynamics of
EU (2000) Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 the root mealybugs, Geococcus spp. (Homoptera:
on protective Rhizoecus hibisci 367 2005 OEPP/ Pseudococcidae) infesting banana in Kerala. Entomon
EPPO, Bulletin OEPP/EPPO bulletin 35, pp 365367 35(3):163167
Godfrey LD, Pickel C (1998) Seasonal dynamics and Smitha MS, Mathew MP (2010b) Management of root
management schemes for a subterranean mealybug, mealybugs, Geococcus spp. In banana cv. Nendran.
Rhizoecus kondonis Kuwana, pest of alfalfa. Southwest Pest Manag Hortic Ecosyst 16(2):108119
Entomol 23(4):343350
69 Root Mealybugs 641

Smitha MS, Mathew MP (2011) In vitro assays on the sum in Southern Ethipia. (Special Issue: Bananas,
inuence of selected pesticides on the growth param- Plantains and ensete II.). Tree and Forestry Science
eters of entomopathogen, Hirsutella sp. Indian and. Biotechnology 4(2):9597
J Entomol 73(4):343345 Tadesse E, Azerefegne F, Alemu T, Addis T, Blomme G
Smitha MS, Mathew MP, Thomas J, Ushakumari R, Nair S (2010b) Studies on the efcacy of some selected
(2005) Root mealybug, Geococcus citrinus: a to banana botanicals against ensete root mealybug
cultivation in Kerala. Insect Environ 11(3):112113 (Cataenococcus ensete) Williams and Matile-Ferrero
Sridhar V, Joshi S, Jhansi Rani B, Kumar R (2012) First (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) (Special Issue:
Record of the Lantana Mealy bug, Phenacoccus par- Bananas, Plantains and ensete II.). Tree and Forestry
vus Morrison (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae) Science and. Biotechnology 4(2):9194
as a Pest of China Aster, Callistephus chinensis (L.) Ventataramaiah GH, Rehman PA (1989) Ants associated
Nees from south India. J Hortic Sci 7:108109 with the mealybugs of coffee. Indian Coff 43:1314
Tadesse E, Azerefegne F, Alemu T, Blomme G, Addis T Williams DJ (1985) Hypogeic mealybugs of the genus
(2010a) The effect of insecticides against the root Rhizoecus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) in India. J Nat
mealybug (Cataenococcus ensete) of Ensete ventrico- Hist 19(2):233241
Coffee
70
P.K. Vinod Kumar, G.V. Manjunath Reddy,
H.G. Seetharama, and M.M. Balakrishnan

70.1 Species Distribution gata Ckll. has also been recorded (Chacko and
Bhat 1976). They attack both robusta and arabica
Among the two commercially cultivated coffee but prefer the former. Planococcus cus and P.
varieties, Coffea arabica L. (arabica coffee) and minor have been recorded on coffee as minor
C. canephora Pierre ex Froehner (robusta cof- pests. The mealybugs, P. citri and P. lilacinus, are
fee), the latter is more prone to attack by mealy- distributed throughout the coffee tracts of India
bugs since this variety is grown in more open and can be noticed quite often during the summer
conditions and at lower elevations. Over 50 spe- months. Planococcus lilacinus is predominantly
cies of scales and mealybugs are reported to found in Kodagu district of Karnataka state,
attack various parts of the coffee tree roots, while P. lilacinus and P. citri are found in equal
branches, leaves, ower clusters and berries proportion in Wayanad district of Kerala state in
where they suck the sap and are of great eco- India (Abdul Rahiman et al. 1995). In Wayanad
nomic importance (Wrigley 1988). Planococcus district of Kerala, the population of P. citri was
kenyae (Le Pelley), popularly known as coffee higher in all the zones compared to P. lilacinus
mealybug, is distributed in Uganda, Tanzania and (Abdul Rahiman and Naik 2009b). For P. lilaci-
Kenya (Bigger 2009). The two most commonly nus, several collateral hosts have been recorded,
encountered mealybugs on coffee in India are which can aid in the survival of the mealybug
Planococcus citri Risso (Coleman and Kannan even if adequate measures are adopted to control
1918; Ayyar 1940) and P. lilacinus Ckll. (Sekhar them on coffee (Bhat and Shamanna 1972)
1964; Bhat and Shamanna 1972). Ferrisia vir- (Table 70.1).

P.K.V. Kumar (*) G.V.M. Reddy


H.G. Seetharama M.M. Balakrishnan
Central Coffee Research Institute,
Chikmagalur 577117, Karnataka, India
e-mail: i2vinod03@gmail.com

Springer India 2016 643


M. Mani, C. Shivaraju (eds.), Mealybugs and their Management in Agricultural
and Horticultural crops, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2677-2_70
644 P.K.V. Kumar et al.

Table 70.1 List of mealybugs recorded on coffee from different countries


Mealybug species Region Reference
Archeomyrmococcus dolichoderi Williams Indonesia Williams (2004)
Benedictycoccina ornata (Hambleton) Trinidad & Tobago Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Capitisetella migrans (Green) Surinam Bigger (2009)a
Cataenococcus sp. India Williams (2004)
Coccidella globocula (Hambleton) Trinidad & Tobago Bigger (2009)
Coccidohystrix insolita (Green) India Williams (2004)
Crisicoccus hirsutus (Newstead) India Williams (2004)
Delottococcus aberiae De Lotto Kenya Bigger (2009)
Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) Brazil, El Salvador, Guatemala, Trinidad Williams and Granara de
and Tobago, Venezuela, Uganda Willink (1992)
Colombia, Costa Rica, Federated States Bigger (2009)
of Micronesia, Cuba, Guam, Hawaii,
Honduras, Indonesia Madagascar, New
Caledonia, Surinam, Zaire
Cook Is, Fiji, Tonga Williams and Watson
(1988)
Malaysia, India Williams (2004)
Papua New Guinea Williams (1986b)
Dysmicoccus debregeasiae (Green) India Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus grassii (Leonardi) Brazil Culik et al. (2006)
Colombia, Costa Rica Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Dysmicoccus lepelleyi (Betrem) Indonesia Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Beardsley Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Western Samoa Williams and Watson
(1988)
Dysmicoccus nesophilus Williams & Papua New Guinea Williams and Watson
Watson (1988)
Dysmicoccus probrevipes (Morrison) Guatemala Bigger (2009)
Dysmicoccus radicis (Green) Brazil, Surinam, Venezuela Bigger (2009)
Dysmicoccus subterreus Williams India Williams (2004)
Dysmicoccus texensis (Tinsley). Portugal Alves et al.(2009)
Brazil Souza et al. (2008)
Farinococcus sp. Ghana Bigger (2009)
Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) Colombia, Ghana, Guatemala, El Williams and Granara de
Salvador Willink (1992)
Federated States of Micronesia Caroline Bigger (2009)
Is, Fiji, Hawaii, Indonesia, Kenya
Madagascar, Malaysia, China
New Caledonia, Papua New Guinea,
Philippines, Sierra Leone, Solomon Is,
Sudan
Tanzania, Uganda, Zaire, Cameroon
Vietnam Williams (2004)
Ferrisia sp. Colombia Bigger (2009)
Formicococcus greeni (Vayssiere) Madagascar Bigger (2009)
Formicococcus ireneus (De Lotto) Uganda Bigger (2009)
(continued)
70 Coffee 645

Table 70.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Region Reference
Formicococcus njalensis (Laing) Ghana, Ivory Coast, Sierra Leone Bigger (2009)
Togo, Zaire
Formicococcus robustus (Ezzat & Mc China Bigger (2009)
Connell) India Williams (2004)
Geococcus coffeae Green Costa Rica Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Brazil, Colombia, Surinam Bigger (2009)
El Salvador, Ghana, Guatemala,
Honduras
Hypogeococcus boharti Miller Mexico Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) Cameroon Williams (1986a)
India Williams (2004)
Belize, Indonesia, Tanzania Bigger (2009)
Maconellicoccus ugandae (Laing) Kenya, Uganda Bigger (2009)
Neochavesia caldasiae (Balachowsky) Colombia Bigger (2009)
Neochavesia eversi (Beardsley) Colombia Bigger (2009)
Neochavesia trinidadensis (Beardsley) Colombia Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Nipaecoccus coffeae (Hempel) Brazil Bigger (2009)
Nipaecoccus lamentosus (Cockerell) Haiti Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Nipaecoccus nipae (Maskell) Dominican Republic Bigger (2009)
Nipaecoccus pseudolamentosus Betrem Indonesia Bigger (2009)
Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead) Vietnam,India Williams (2004)
Angola, China, Indonesia Bigger (2009)
Kenya, Madagascar, Malaysia
Uganda, S. Africa, Tanzania
Nipaecoccus sp. Colombia Bigger (2009)
Paracoccus burnerae (Brain) Ethiopean region Ben-Dove (1994)
Paracoccus cognatus Williams India Williams (2004)
Paraputo sp. India Bigger (2009)
Paraputo leveri (Green) Papua New Guinea Ben-Dove (1994)
Phenacoccus hargreavesi (Laing) Ethiopean region Ben-Dove (1994)
Planococcus angkorensis (Takahashi) India Williams (2004)
Planococcus angkorensis (Takahashi) Cuba Williams and Matile-
Ferrero (2009)
Planococcus citri (Risso) Costa Rica, Honduras Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Angola, Australia, Brazil Bigger (2009)
Canary Is, China, Colombia, Cuba,
Dominican Republic Eritrea, Ghana,
Guatemala, Hawaii
Indonesia, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi,
Peru, Philippines, Sao Tome & Principe,
Vietnam, S. Africa, Sudan, Uganda
Surinam, Taiwan, Tanzania
Togo, Trinidad & Tobago, Zaire,
Zimbabwe
(continued)
646 P.K.V. Kumar et al.

Table 70.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Region Reference
Planococcus minor (Maskell) India Williams (2004)
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel India, Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
Pl. fungicola Watson & Cox Cuba Williams and Matile-
Ferrero (2009)
Pl. halli Ezzat & McConnell. Cuba Williams and Matile-
Ferrero (2009)
Pl. radicum Watson & Cox Cuba Williams and Matile-
Ferrero (2009)
Planococcus kenyae (Le Pelley) Kenya, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda Bigger (2009)
Zaire
Cuba Williams and Matile-
Ferrero (2009)
Pl. kraunhiae (Kuwana) Vietnam Nguyen Thi et al. (2011)
Cuba Williams and Matile-
Ferrero (2009)
Planococcus lilacinus (Cockerell) Philippines Williams and Matile-
Ferrero (2009)
Indonesia, Reunion, India Bigger (2009)
Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Vietnam
Planococcus minor (Maskell) Argentina, Costa Rica, Brazil, Guatemala Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Fiji, Vanuatu Williams (1982)
Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Indonesia Williams (2004)
Papua, New Guinea Williams (1986b)
India Reddy et al. (1990)
Australia, Cuba, Federated States of Bigger (2009)
Micronesia, Tonga, Western Samoa
Planococcus radicum Watson &Cox Nigeria, Tanzania Ben-Dove (1994)
Planococcoides irenus Delotto Uganda, Angola Ben-Dove (1994)
Planococcoides nijalensis (Laing) Ben-Dove (1994)
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel Sri Lanka, India Williams (2004)
Western Samoa Williams and Watson
(1988)
Brazil, Honduras Bigger (2009)
Pseudococcus landoi (Balachowsky) Neotropical Bendove (1994)
Pseudococcus longispinus Colombia, Costa Rica, Guadeloupe, Java, Bigger (2009)
(Targioni-Tozzetti) Madagascar
Martinique, New Caledonia, Papua New
Guinea, Puerto Rico, Reunion
Sri Lanka, Vietnam
India, Indonesia, Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
Paracoccus burnerae (Brain) Angola, Kenya Bigger (2009)
Paraputo leveri (Green) Papua New Guinea Williams and Watson
(1988)
Paraputo podagrosus (Green) Surinam Bigger (2009)
Paraputo sp. Ghana, Guatemala, Honduras Bigger (2009)
Phenacoccus hargreavesi (Laing) Angola, Tanzania, Uganda Bigger (2009)
Phenacoccus madeirensis Green Ghana Bigger (2009)
Phenacoccus parvus Morrison Surinam Bigger (2009)
(continued)
70 Coffee 647

Table 70.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Region Reference
Planococcus fungicola Watson & Cox Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda Watson and Cox (1990)
Zaire, Zimbabwe
Planococcus halli Ezzat & McConnell Colombia Bigger (2009)
Guatemala Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Planococcus kraunhiae (Kuwana) Taiwan Bigger (2009)
Planococcus radicum Watson & Cox Nigeria, Tanzania Watson and Cox (1990)
Planococcus sp. Cuba Bigger (2009)
Pseudococcus calceolariae (Maskell) Indonesia Bigger (2009)
Pseudococcus concavocerarii James Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda Bigger (2009)
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel Brazil, Honduras Bigger (2009)
Sri Lanka Williams (2004)
Western Samoa Williams and Watson
(1988)
Pseudococcus elisae Borchsenius Brazil Bigger (2009)
Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi Gimpel & Colombia, Guatemala Bigger (2009)
Miller Trinidad & Tobago Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Pseudococcus kikuyuensis James Kenya Bigger (2009)
Pseudococcus landoi (Balachowsky) Costa Rica, Guatemala Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Pseudococcus longispinus Brazil Souza et al. (2008)
Pseudococcus occiduus De Lotto Cameroon, Ethiopia, Sudan Williams and Matile-
Ferrero (1995)
Angola, Kenya, Tanzania Bigger (2009)
Uganda, Zaire
Pseudococcus pseudocitriculus (Betrem) Indonesia Java Bigger (2009)
Pseudococcus pseudolamentosus Betrem Java Ben-Dove (1994)
Pseudococcus sociabilis Hambleton Colombia Bigger (2009)
Pseudococcus solomonensis Williams Papua, New Guinea Williams and Watson
(1988)
Pseudococcus sp. Colombia, Ethiopia, Indonesia Bigger (2009)
Ivory Coast, Kenya, Kenya, Sierra Leone,
Zaire
Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Venezuela
Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) St Helena Bigger (2009)
Pseudorhizoecus proximus Green Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Surinam Bigger (2009)
Puto antioquensis (Murillo) Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras Bigger (2009)
Puto barberi (Cockerell) Colombia, Venezuela Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Puto lasiorum (Cockerell) El Salvador Bigger (2009)
Puto mexicanus (Cockerell) El Salvador Bigger (2009)
Guatemala Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Puto sp. Costa Rica Bigger (2009)
(continued)
648 P.K.V. Kumar et al.

Table 70.1 (continued)


Mealybug species Region Reference
Rastrococcus iceryoides (Green) India Williams (2004)
Malaysia Williams (1989); Miller
(1941)
Rastrococcus spinosus (Robinson) Indonesia, Philippines, Taiwan Bigger (2009)
Rastrococcus vicorum Williams & Watson Indonesia Williams and Watson
(1988b)
Rhizoecus americanus (Hambleton) Colombia Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Ecuador Bigger (2009)
Rhizoecus arabicus Hambleton Colombia, Costa Rica Bigger (2009)
Guadeloupe Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Rhizoecus americanus (Hambleton) Nearctic, neotropicpalaearctic region Bendove (1994)
Rhizoecus cacticans (Hambleton) Guatemala Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Rhizoecus caladii Green Surinam Bigger (2009)
Rhizoecus coffeae Laing Brazil,Colombia, Surinam, Venezuela Bigger (2009)
Costa Rica Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Rhizoecus compotor Williams & Granara Colombia Williams and Granara de
de Willink Willink (1992)
Rhizoecus cyperalis (Hambleton) El Salvador Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Rhizoecus divaricatus Hambleton Nicaragua Bigger (2009)
Rhizoecus eloti Giard Guadeloupe Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Rhizoecus falcifer Kunckel d'Herculais Surinam Bigger (2009)
Rhizoecus globoculus (Hambleton) Trinidad Ben-Dove (1994)
Rhizoecus knodaonis Kuwana Coffee Ben-Dove (1994)
Rhizoecus ornatus (Hambleton) Trinidad Ben-Dove (1994)
Rhizoecus nemoralis (Hambleton) El Salvador, Honduras Bigger (2009)
Rhizoecus tropicalis Hambleton Guatemala Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Mexico Ben-Dove (1994)
Ripersiella andensis (Hambleton) Colombia Bigger (2009)
Ripersiella campestris (Hambleton) Guatemala Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
Ripersiella kondonis (Kuwana) Guatemala Williams and Granara de
Willink (1992)
a
Original reference from the Source: Bigger (2009)
70 Coffee 649

and crop loss (Ramesh 1987). Crop loss can be


enormous depending upon the level of infestation.
Heavy infestation leads to development of fungus,
Capnodium sp., on the honey dew secreted by the
mealybugs which forms a black coating on the
surface of the leaves. This can hinder the photo-
synthesis process as well as raise the surface tem-
perature of the leaves. Sometimes the infestation
is on the roots leading to serious damage to young
seedlings in the eld. This mealybug is very
destructive to the roots of young plants. In areas
where replanting is taken up, the roots of the
Planococcus kenyae on coffee
young coffee plants are usually observed to be
infested by the mealybug leading to debility of the
plants, with the plants exhibiting stunted growth
and yellowing of leaves. The roots are sometimes
encrusted with mycelia of a fungus, Diacanthodes
sp., in association with the mealybugs. The mealy-
bugs are visible beneath the fungus when the
encrustation is peeled away (Chacko and
Sreedharan 1981). When the root form is associ-
ated with fungus, it is capable of killing the plant.
Planococcus citri is a pest on arabica and robusta
coffee (young trees are occasionally killed)
(Anonymous 1998). Ferrisia virgata was rst
Planococcus citri
recorded on robusta coffee during 1976; the inci-
dence appeared to be limited but severe infested
occurred on leaves, shoots and berries (Chacko
70.2 Damage and Bhat 1976). In Uganda, attack of the berry
clusters by F. virgata interrupted normal bean
Heavy infestation of mealybugs (P. citri) around development, leading to premature ripening and
the oral buds leads to deformity of the owers drying of berries on primaries. Such berries were
and also sometimes total arrest of the blossom of lower marketable quality. Mean bean size was
process. The mealybugs can be usually seen reduced by 7.7 %. Roast colour, centre-cut appear-
infesting the tender twigs, fruits and leaves. They ance and liquor quality were reduced (Kucel and
suck the sap leading to debilitation of the plant Ngabirano 1997).

Coffee berries affected by mealybugs Leaf damage


650 P.K.V. Kumar et al.

70.3 Seasonal Development and the cock tailed ant, Crematogaster sp.,
actually chase away the bigger predators while
Mealybug population increases if warm and their constant presence over the mealybug colony
humid conditions prevail. Continuous monsoon, is a hindrance for the parasitoids. This is evident
high humidity and low temperatures are detri- in the case of the lepidopteran predator Spalgis
mental to mealybug development. The migration epeus Westwood wherein the aggressiveness of
of mealybugs starts in September/October from the ants and S. epeus population indicated a
the ground to the aerial parts of the coffee plant highly negative relationship. Species belonging
along the main stem. The attack of mealybugs to the genus Crematogaster interfered more with
becomes severe during summer and with the predator activity than the ant O. smaragdina
intermittent showers/irrigation (Anonymous (Vinod Kumar et al. 2008a). About 27 species of
1998). Excessive removal of shade in the robusta ants have been recorded world over in associa-
plantations often leads to are up of mealybugs. tion with different species of homoptera attack-
Planococcus citri on arabica and robusta coffee ing coffee. Thirteen species, namely
is distributed throughout the coffee tracts of Crematogaster sp., Anaplolepis longipes Jerdon,
India, mostly on robusta coffee which is grown at Myrmica brunnea Saunders, Plagiolepis sp.,
lower elevations with lesser shade. Two peaks Paratrechina longicornis Latreille, Camponotus
were in FebruaryMarch and JanuaryMarch; rufogalaucus Jerdon, Anoplolepis gracilipes
there was a positive correlation between maxi- (F. Smith), Tapinoma melanocephalum
mum temperature and adults and nymphs and a (Fabricius), Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius),
negative correlation with relative humidity and Acropyga sp., Technomyrmex albipes Smith,
nymphs (Gokuldas Kumar 1987). According to Solenopsis geminata Fabricius, Monomorium
Vinod Kumar et al. (2007), the population of P. sp., have been recorded from coffee tracts of
citri on coffee responded positively to maximum South India (Venkataramaiah and Abdul Rahiman
temperature and had no correlation with mini- 1989).
mum temperature. More than rainfall, relative Of the ant species so far recorded, Plagiolepis
humidity was negatively correlated with the sp. is widespread and seen in almost every estate
mealybug population. The hours of sunshine in the coffee growing regions. Acrophaga sp. is
received had a positive correlation with mealy- recorded from Kodagu district of Karnataka state.
bug population (Vinod Kumar et al. 2007). The presence of ant O. smaragdina along with
mealybugs is not a limiting factor for the estab-
lishment of introduced parasitoid Leptomastix
70.4 Ant Association dactylopii attacking P. citri in the eld. The ant
with Mealybugs species associated with mealybugs recorded from
other coffee growing countries are: Camponotus
Mealybugs produce honeydew, a sweet excretory sp. in Brazil, Lepisiota incise (Forel) in Kenya,
product, to which ants are attracted. Ants provide Myrmelachista ramulorum Wheele, Paratrechina
mealybugs sanitation and protection from natu- jaegerskioeldi (Mayr) in Kenya, Solenopsis
ral enemies. The ants feed on the honeydew and punctaticeps (Mayr) in Kenya (James 1933),
act as clearing agents. The common ants found in Pheidole speculifera (Emery) in Kenya, Lepisiota
association with the mealybugs on coffee in India capensis (Mayr) in Kenya, Monomorium phara-
are Anoplolepis longipes, Oecophylla smarag- onis (Linnaeus) in Kenya, Myrmicaria natalensis
dina and Crematogaster sp. (Venkataramaiah and eumenoides (Gerstaeker) in Kenya, Pseudolasius
Rahiman 1989). Sometimes, ants of the genus gowdei (Wheeler) in Uganda, Pheidole punctu-
Camponotus are also observed. Some of the lata (Mayr) in Kenya and Technomyrmex albipes
aggressive ants like the red ant, O. smaragdina, (F. Smith) in Kenya.
70 Coffee 651

70.5 Natural Enemies Spalgis epeus (Westwood), lycaenidae, Brumiodes


suturalis (Fabricius), Horniolus vietnamicus
Several indigenous predators and parasitoids have (Coccinellidae) Pseudoscymnus pallidicollis
been recorded from mealybugs on coffee in India. (Mulsant) are known to attack coffee ecosystem in
They exert considerable pressure on the bug popu- India (Reddy et al. 1990, 1992; Balakrishnan et al.
lation in ideal conditions. If conditions are suit- 1991; Chacko and Bhat 1976; Le Pelley 1968;
able or made suitable for the activity of the Irulandi et al. 2000; Prakasan et al. 1992). On
indigenous natural enemies, then no external Ferrisia virgata, the parasitoids namely Aenasius
effort to manage the mealybug is required (Chacko advena Compare, Anagyrus qadrii (Hayat Alam
1987; Venkataramaiah and Ramaiah 1988; & Agarwal), Anicetus annulatus Timberlake,
Prakasan et al. 1992; Reddy et al. 1992). Spalgis Blepyrus insularis (Cameron) were reported in
epeus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) the indigenous India (Balakrishnan et al. 1991). And predators
buttery predator of the mealy bugs is highly ef- namely Alloprapta javana (Weidemann),
cient in bringing down the population of the Brumiodes suturalis (Fabricius), Scymnus sp.,
mealybugs (Aitken 1894; Vinod Kumar et al. Gitona sp., Leucopis sp., Mallada sp., Scymnus
2008b). The biology of this predator has been sp., Spalgis epeus (Westwood), Diadiplosis coc-
studied extensively (Vinod Kumar et al. 2006) and cidivora (Felt) are known to attack mealybugs
the method of eld augmentation standardized for present in the coffee ecosystem in India
achieving the desired control (Vinod Kumar et al. (Balakrishnan et al. 1991; Chacko and Bhat 1976).
2009). Exclusion of the ants frequenting mealy- In Cuba, the cecidomyiid Diadiplosis cocci was
bug infested coffee plants assists the natural ene- the most abundant natural enemy, followed by
mies in becoming more active. Ant control alone Leptomastix dactylopii, two encyrtid species,
can be a very effective method to tackle any Signiphora sp. and an eulophid. Signiphora sp.
mealybug on coffee estates. Several species of was recorded as a parasitoid of this pest complex
natural enemies have been recorded on mealybugs for the rst time (Martinez et al. 1995).
in India. On Planococcus citri, the parasitoids
namely Alamella ava Agarwal, Aprostocerus
purpureus (Cameron), Anagyrus agraensis 70.6 Management
Saraswat, Anagyrus inopus, Cryptochetum sp.,
Leptomastix nigrocoxalis Compere, 70.6.1 Cultural Control
Prochiloneurus sp., Coccidoxenoides perminutus
are known to parasitise in coffee ecosystem in During the dry season, frequent checks should be
India (Pruthi and Mani 1940; Reddy et al. 1990; conducted for the presence of scales and mealy-
Chacko et al. 1977; Prakasan and Gokuldas bugs on the coffee plants and the movement of
Kumar 1985). And the predators namely ants. Colonies of mealybugs are commonly
Cryptochaetus sp., Dicrodiplosis sp., attended by ants because of the sweet substance
Pseudoscymnus pallidicollis (Mulsant), Pullus called honey dew excreted by them. Ants make
pallidicollis, Spalgis epeus (Westwood), nests on the coffee plants or on shade trees by
Domomyza perspicax (Knab) are known to attack joining two or more leaves. Such nests have to be
coffee ecosystem in India (Reddy et al. 1990). On cut down and burnt frequently. If it is possible to
Planococcus lilacinus, the parasitoids namely trim the branches of the coffee plants in such a
Anagyrus sp., Apenteles sp. nr. sauros Nixon, way that they do not touch the soil and nearby
Gonatocerus sp., Gyranusoidea sp., Alamella shade trees, it should be done. If the branches
ava, Tetracnemoidea india (Ayyar), Leptacis sp. touch the ground or the shade tree, this would be
were recorded in India (Reddy et al. 1990). And used as bridge by the ants to travel on to the coffee
the predators namely Dicrodiplosis sp., plants. Once the plants are isolated, banding with
Hyperaspis maindroni, Leucopis luteicornis, grease may be tried on the main stem. Grease
Pullus pallidicollis, Scymnus (Nephus) severini, should not be directly applied on the coffee plant.
652 P.K.V. Kumar et al.

A newspaper may rst be tightly tied on the stem cloprid and thiamethoxam in the liquid form,
and over this paper, grease may be applied. applied to the base of the plant, cause 100 %
Optimum shade maintenance helps in regulating mortality of the coffee root mealybug,
the micro-climate around the coffee plants. Plants Dysmicoccus texensis, independent of the coffee
exposed to sunlight are favourable to mealybug plants age, in a single application (Souza et al.
attack. Since many of the common weeds found 2007).
in the coffee plantations harbour mealy bugs, it is Planococcus kenyae only be controlled by a
best to destroy the weeds regularly. combination of measures. Ant management prac-
tices included banding the coffee plants with
20 cm wide plastic bands covered with a sticky-
70.6.2 Chemical Control substances mixed with insecticide chlorpyrifos.
Removal of suckers that touch the ground is to be
Control of mealybugs on coffee using insecti- done to prevent ants. Spraying on the ant nests in
cides was the choice option before stress was the ground with the insecticides is to be carried
placed on biological control (Rangashetty et al. out to control the ants,
1959). Several trials were conducted using insec- The other management includes the applica-
ticides for achieving affordable control of mealy- tion of oils (such as vegetable oils, neem oil or
bugs (Sekhar and Narayana Rao 1964; Chacko mineral oils) or soapy solutions (12 %) to kill
et al. 1976; Vinod Kumar and Prakasan 1992). mealybugs by suffocation. Spraying cow urine
The insecticides tried were mostly organophos- fermented for 1 day, in a ratio of 1 urine : 4 water
phates. Synthetic pyrethroids did not show any can cause moderate reduction of mealybug popu-
promise against the mealybugs. But most of these lation. Spraying with dimethoate, diazinon, eth-
insecticides were highly toxic to the introduced ion and carbaryl are more toxic (class II,
natural enemies as well as indigenous natural moderately hazardous) (http://www.plantwise.
enemies (Chacko et al. 1979; Stephen et al. 1981; org/FullTextPDF/2013/20137803401.pdf). In
Reddy et al. 1988; Vinod Kumar et al. 2010). In Brazil, with systemic insecticides for the control
the case of severe incidence, quinalphos 20EC at of Dysmicoccus cryptus (Hemp.) (Planococcus
300 ml in 200 L of water plus 200 ml of any wet- cryptus), which attacks the roots of coffee, mor-
ting agent is recommended as hot spot applica- tality was complete and no reinfestation occurred
tion and not as a blanket spray. If the root region for more than 60 days when granules containing
is infested with the mealybug P. lilacinus, a soil 10 % aldicarb had been placed in a furrow (10 cm
drench with dimethoate 30EC at 660 ml in 200 L deep at a radius of 30 cm from the trunk) at the
of water is found to be extremely useful (Vinod rate of 75 g/tree, or when an emulsion spray con-
Kumar and Prakasan 1992). Kerosene, as spray, taining 0.06 % vamidothion was applied to the
can also be used as a milder measure to tackle the foliage at 2 l/tree. Good initial results were also
mealybugs. For spray use 4 L of kerosene in obtained with granules containing disulfoton,
200 L of water along with a wetting agent. The phorate or aphidan [S-((ethylsulnyl) methyl) O,
solution should be mixed thoroughly with the O-bis (1-methylethyl) phosphorodithioate]
wetting agent so that any risk of un-emulsied (Cavalcante 1975).
kerosene falling on the plants is avoided
(Gokuldas Kumar et al. 1989). Plant products,
like neem formulations, have also been tested 70.6.3 Biological Control
against P. citri and some of them have been found
to affect the mealybug population considerably Several indigenous natural enemies on their own
and bring about reduction (Irulandi et al. 2000). are capable of keeping the mealybug population
Iimidacloprid at 0.01 % was known to cause 94 in check (Reddy et al. 1992). This is particularly
% P. lilacinus on coffee after 21 days of spraying true in the case of P. lilacinus, the dipterans
in India (Irulandi et al. 2000). In Brazil, imida- Triommata coccidivora Felt were able to suppress
70 Coffee 653

the mealybug population up to 96 % (Prakasan the predator C. montrouzieri with the perfor-
et al. 1992). mance of the parasitoid L. dactylopii in the eld
In Kenya, the release of C.montrouzieri failed as the predator is not able to discriminate between
to suppress the coffee mealybug Planococcus parasitized and healthy mealy bugs (Prakasan
kenyae. In Celebes, substantial control of and Bhat 1985).
Rastrococcus iceryoides in coffee was obtained The fungus Beauveria bassiana (Bals.-Criv.)
with C. montrouzieri . Control of the mealybug, Vuill. (UEL 114) and the nematode Steinernema
Ferrisia virgata, in coffee plantation of Java was carpocapsae (Weiser) are known to cause high
attempted in 1918 using C. montrouzieri. mortality in short time of adult female mealybugs
Establishment of Cryptolaemus occurred Dysmicoccus texensis (Tinsley) (Andalo et al.
throughout the eastern Java on Planococcus citri 2004). Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs)
but with determinable effect on mealybug infes- have potential for biological pest control and
tations which declined. In Dutch East Indies, an have been successfully used in several countries
attempt was made to use C. montrouzieri against in soil and cryptic pests control, as for example
F. virgata on coffee. the coffee root mealybug D. texensis. Greenhouse
In India, severe infestations of mealybugs results demonstrate that aqueous suspension
(Planococcus spp.) occurred in many estates in (JPM3) was more efcient with 70 % control
South Wayanad, Kerala. At Shevaroy hills, adults efciency. In eld experiments, treatments with
and grubs of C. montrouzieri were seen on San aqueous suspensions of insecticide Actara 250
Ramon hybrid coffee where mealybug infestation WG (thiamethoxam), used for comparison, and
was virtually cleaned up (Chacko 1979). A JPM3 were the only ones statistically different
release rate of ve beetles per mealybug infested from control (Alves et al. 2009). Heterorhabditis
Robusta coffee, three beetles per Arabica coffee bacteriophora Poinar strain HC1 was known to
and two beetles per San-ram Coffee plants has cause 100 % mortality in the inoculated the cof-
been recommended to control the coffee mealy- fee mealybug complex (Rodriguez et al. 1997).
bugs in India (Singh 1978). The drawback is that
C. montrouzieri becomes active when the mealy-
bug population reaches high levels by which time References
the damage to the ower buds and tender berries
would have been already caused leading to crop Abdul Rahiman P, Naik PR (2009a) Field performance of
mealy bug parasitoid Leptomastix dactylopii (How.) in
loss (Chacko 1982). Leptomastix dactylopii
coffee ecosystem of Wayanad district in Kerala.
(Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), a parasitoid of P. J Coffee Res 37(1&2):1015
citri, was introduced into India during 1983 from Abdul Rahiman P, Naik PR (2009b) Distribution of coffee
Trinidad through the then Project Directorate of mealy bug in Wayanad district of Kerala. J Coffee Res
37(1&2):8286
Biological Control, now the National Bureau of
Abdul Rahiman P, Vijayalakshmi CK, Reddy AGS (1995)
Agriculturally Important Insects, Bangalore Occurrence and distribution of mealy bug in coffee.
(Chacko 1987). A total of 15,000 Leptomastix Kissan World 22(11):3940
parasitoids were released at 11 locations in Aitken EH (1894) The larva and pupa of Spalgis epius
Westw. Bombay Nat Hist Soc J 8:485487
Kodagu district having mixed plantations of cof-
Alves VS, Moino Junior A, Santa-Cecilia LVC, Rohde C,
fee with oranges against P. citri. The parasitoid da Silva MAT (2009) Tests for the control of coffee
has established within two months of release. root mealybug Dysmicoccus texensis (Tinsley)
Parasitism reached as much as 100 % in some (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae) with Heterorhabditis
(Rhabditida, Heterorhabditidae). [Portuguese].
colonies (Nargatti et al. 1992). The parasitoid L.
Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 53(1):139143
dactylopii has established in the robusta coffee Andalo V, Moino Junior A, Santa-Cecilia LVC, Souza GC
elds in the Wayanad district of Kerala state and (2004) Selection of entomopathogenic fungi and nem-
is bringing about appreciable reduction in the atodes to the coffee root mealybug Dysmicoccus tex-
ensis (Tinsley) [Portuguese]. Arquivos do Instituto
population of the mealybugs (Abdul Rahiman
Biologico (Sao Paulo) 71(2):181187
and Naik 2009a) There exists an interference of
654 P.K.V. Kumar et al.

Anonymous (1998) A compendium on pests and diseases Gokuldas Kumar M (1987) Population trend of the coffee
of coffee and their management in India. Coffee Board mealy bug, Planococcus citri (Risso) under the inu-
Research Department, India, 67 p ence of certain key abiotic factors. Proceedings of the
Ayyar TVR (1940) Handbook of economic entomology workshop on the insect pest management strategies in
for South India. Madras, 528 p coffee, cardamom and tea cropping systems. J Coffee
Balakrishnan MM, Sreedharan K, Venkatesha MG, Res 17:99100
Krishnamurthy P, Bhat PK (1991) Observations on Gokuldas Kumar M, Bhat PK, Ramaiah PK (1989)
Ferrisia virgata (Ckll) (Homoptera: Pseudoccocidae) Potential role of kerosene and neem derivatives in inte-
and its natural enemies on coffee, with the records of grated management of mealy bugs on coffee. J Coffee
predators and host plants. J Coffee Res 21:1119 Res 19(1):1729
Ben-Dove Y.A. 1994. Systematic Catalogue of the Irulandi S, Kumar PKV, Seetharama HG, Sreedharan K
Mealybugs of the World (Insecta: Homoptera: (2000) Laboratory evaluation of imidacloprid 17.8%
Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae and Putoidae). Intercept SL against the coffee mealy bug, Planococcus lilaci-
Ltd, 686 pp nus (Cockerell). J Coffee Res 28(1/2):9294
Bhat PK, Shamanna HV (1972) Some new collateral hosts James HC (1933) Taxonomic notes on the coffee mealy
of Planococcus lilacinus from South India. J Coffee bugs of Kenya Colony. Bull Entomol Res 24:429436
Res 2(2):27 Kucel P, Ngabirano H (1997) Effect of stripped mealybug
Bigger M (2009) A geographical distribution list of insects (Ferrisia virgata Cockerell) on marketable quality of
and mites associated with coffee derived from litera- Uganda Robusta coffee (Coffea canephora Pierre).
ture published before 2010. Available at: www.ipm- Dix-septieme colloque scientique international sur le
network.net/commodity/coffee_insects.pdf cafe, Nairobi, Kenya, 2025 juillet 1997, pp 771778
Cavalcante RD (1975) Control of the coffee root mealy- Le Pelley RH (1968) Pests of coffee. Longmans, London,
bug Planococcus cryptus Hempel, with systemic 590 p
insecticides [Portuguese]. Fitossanidade 1(2):6869 Martinez M, de los A, Hernandez M, Ceballos M (1995)
Chacko MJ (1979) The recovery of Cryptolaemus mon- Ecological relationships of natural enemies of the
trouzieri on the Shevaroy hills. J Coffee Res mealybug complex in Topes de Collantes region.
9(3):8081 [Spanish]. Revista de Proteccion Vegetal 10(2):
Chacko MJ (1982) The mealy bug predator Cryptolaemus 159162
montrouzieri. Indian Coffee XLVI(11):300302 Miller NCE (1941) Insects associated with cocoa
Chacko MJ (1987) Biological control with exotic as well (Theobroma cacao) in Malaya. Bull Entomol Res
as indigenous natural enemies. Proceedings of the 32:116
workshop on the insect pest management strategies in Nargatti S, Singh SP, Jayanth KP, Bhusmannavar BS
coffee, cardamom and tea cropping systems. J. Coffee (1992) Introduction and establishment of Leptomastix
Res 17:109113 dactylopii How. against Planococcus species in India.
Chacko MJ, Bhat PK (1976) Record of Ferrisia virgata Indian J Plant Prot 19:102104
and its natural enemy Spalgis epius on coffee in India. Nguyen Thi Thuy, Pham Thi Vuong, Ha Quang Hung
J Coffee Res 6:5657 (2011) Composition of scale insects in Dalak, Vietnam
Chacko MJ, Sreedharan K (1981) Control of Planococcus and reproductive biology Japanese mealybug
lilacinus and Diacanthodes sp. associated with coffee Planococcus kraunhiae Kuawana (Hemiotera:
roots. J Coffee Res 11(3):7680 Pseudicoccidae). J Eddaas 17(2):2937
Chacko MJ, Bhat PK, Ramanarayana EP (1976) Prakasan CB, Bhat PK (1985) Interference of predator
Laboratory and eld testing of insecticides against Cryptolaemus montrouzieri with performance of a
coffee mealybugs. Indian Coffee XL(4&5):118119 newly introduced parasite, Leptomastix dactylopii.
Chacko MJ, Bhat PK, Ramanarayana EP (1977) New J Coffee Res 15(1&2):2932
records of Coccoidea with notes on natural enemies of Prakasan CB, Gokuldas Kumar M (1985) New record of
Planococcus spp. on coffee in India. J Coffee Res natural enemies of mealybug and green scale. J Coffee
7(3):6870 Res 16(1&2):3840
Chacko MJ, Bhat PK, Ananda Rao LV, Deepak Singh MB Prakasan CB, Vinod Kumar PK, Balakrishnan MM (1992)
(1979) Inuence of some contact insecticides on Biological suppression of the mealy bug Planococcus
adults of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. PLACROSYM lilacinus Cockerell (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) on
II:4446 coffee by Triommata coccidivora (Felt) (Diptera:
Coleman LC, Kunhi Kannan K (1918) Some scale insect Cecidomyiidae). PLACROSYM IX:140141
pests of coffee in India. Entomological Series Pruthi HS, Mani MS (1940) Biological notes on Indian
Bulletin No. 4., Department of Agriculture, Mysore parasitic Chalcidoidea. Miscellaneous Bulletins.
State, 67 p Indian Council Agric Res 30:40
Culik MP, Martins D, Dos S, Gullan PJ (2006) First Ramesh PK (1987) Observations on crop loss in robusta
records of two mealybug species in Brazil and new coffee due to mealy bug and shot-hole borer.
potential pests of papaya and coffee. J Insect Sci Proceedings of the workshop on the insect pest man-
6:16
70 Coffee 655

agement strategies in coffee, cardamom and tea crop- Vinod Kumar PK, Vasudev V, Seetharama HG, Irulandi S,
ping systems. J Coffee Res 17:9495 Sreedharan K (2007) Inuence of abiotic factors on
Rangashetty HT, Swaminathan B, Parthasarathy S (1959) mealy bug population and activity of Spalgis epius on
Insecticides on root mealy bug. Indian Coffee coffee. J Coffee Res 35(1&2):6176
LIII(6):58 Vinod Kumar PK, Vasudev V, Seetharama HG, Irulandi S,
Reddy KB,. Bhat PK, Prakasan CB (1988) Toxicity of cer- Sreedharan K (2008a) Predatory potential of the
tain insecticides and fungicides to Leptomastix dacty- lycaenid Spalgis epius. J Coffee Res 36(1&2):2529
lopii, and introduced parasitoid of Planococcus citri. Vinod Kumar PK, Vasudev V, Seetharama HG, Irulandi S,
PLACROSYM VIII:281284 Sreedharan K (2008b) Attendant ants and activity of
Reddy KB, Sreedharan K, Prakasan CB, Bhat PK (1990) Spalgis epius. J Coffee Res 36(1&2):3845
New records of natural enemies of Planococcus spp., Vinod Kumar PK, Vasudev V, Seetharama HG, Irulandi S,
Coccus viridis (Green) and Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) Sreedharan K (2009) Effect of augmentation of
on coffee in India. J Coffee Res 20(2):153156 Spalgis epius on mealy bug population. J Coffee Res
Reddy KB, Sreedharan K, Prakasan CB, Bhat PK (1992) 37(1&2):6678
Role of indigenous natural enemies in the integrated Vinod Kumar PK, Vasudev V, Seetharama HG, Irulandi S,
management of sucking pests of coffee. PLACROSYM Sreedharan K (2010) Effect of insecticides on Spalgis
IX:152 epius. J Coffee Res 38(1&2):1128
Rodriguez I, Rodriguez MG, Sanchez L, de los Angeles Watson GW, Cox JM (1990) Identity of African coffee
Martinez M (1997) Effectivity of Heterorhabditis bac- root mealybug with descriptions of two new species of
teriophora (Rhabditidae: Heterorhabditidae) against Planococcus (Homopterta;Pseudococcidae). Bull Ent
coffee mealybugs (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Res 80:99105
[Spanish]. Revista de Proteccion Vegetal Williams DJ (1982) The distribution of mealybug genus
12(2):119122 Planococcus(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Melanesia,
Sekhar PS (1964) Pests of coffee. In: Entomology in Polynesia and Kribati. Bull Ent Res 64:535540
India. Entomolgical Society of India, New Delhi, 529 Williams DJ (1986a) The identity and distribution of the
p genus Maconellicoccus Ezzat (Hemiptera:
Sekhar PS, Narayana Rao BK (1964) Studies on the con- Pseudococcidae) in Africa. Bull Entomol Res
trol of coffee mealy bug Planococcus lilacinus 76:351357
(CKLL). Indian Coffee XXVIII(9):205207 Williams DJ (1986b) Rastrococcus invadens sp. n.
Singh SP (1978) Propagation of a coccinellid beetle for (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) introduced from the
the biological control of citrus and coffee mealybugs. Oriental Region to West Africa and causing damage to
Scientic conference, CPA, Dec 1978, 2 p mango, citrus and other trees. Bull Entomol Res
Souza JC, de Reis PR, Ribeiro JA, Santa-Cecilia LVC, 76:695699
Silva RA (2007) Chemical control of the coffee root Williams DJ (1989) The mealybug genus Rastrococcus
mealybug Dysmicoccus texensis (Tinsley, 1900) in Ferris (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Syst Entomol
coffee plants (Coffea arabica L.). [Portuguese]. Coffee 14(4):433486
Sci 2(1):2937 Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The
Souza B, Santa-Cecilia LVC, Prado E, de Souza JC (2008) Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD.,
Mealybugs (Pseudococcidae) on coffee (Coffea ara- London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 p
bica L.) in Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Coffee Sci Williams DJ, Granara de Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs
3(2):104107 of Central and South America. CAB International,
Stephen SD, Venkateshulu K, Chacko MJ (1981) Inuence London, 635 p
of insecticides on Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. 1. Williams DJ, Matile-Ferrero D (1995) The identity and
Effect of residues of Cythion, Ekalux, Lebaycid and distribution of the african mealybug Pseudococcus
Metacid on grub. J Coffee Res 11(4):126128 occiduus De Lotto (Homoptera, Coccoidea,
Venkataramaiah GH, Abdul Rahiman P (1989) Ants asso- Pseudococcidae), a species common on coffee, cacao,
ciated with the Mealybugs of coffee. Indian Coffee mango and other economic plants. Revue Franaise
53(9):1314 dEntomologie 17:14
Venkataramaiah GH, Ramaiah PK (1988) Mealy bugs of Williams DJ, Matile-Ferrero D (2009) A note on two
coffee and their control measure. Indian Coffee mealybug species on coffee in Cuba named in the
52(9):58 genus Planococcus Ferris [Hemiptera, Coccoidea,
Vinod Kumar PK, Prakasan CB (1992) Soil application of Pseudococcidae]. Revue Francaise dEntomologie
systemic insecticides for mealy bug control. J Coffee 31(1):3738
Res 22(1):6568 Williams DJ, Watson GW (1988) In: The scale insects of
Vinod Kumar PK, Vasudev V, Seetharama HG, Irulandi S, the tropical South Pacic Region. Pt. 2: The Mealybugs
Sreedharan K (2006) Biology and biometry of the (Pseudococcidae). CAB International Institute of
lycaenid predator Spalgis epius. J Coffee Res Entomology, London, 260 p
34(1&2):72104 Wrigley G (1988) Coffee. Longman Scientic and
Technical, Essex, 639 p

You might also like