Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Account Approach
versus
Ledger Approach
Parallel
accounting is discussed in detail for the following recommended
approaches:
Chart of accounts approach (or parallel G/L accounts referred to here as the
account approach)
Ledger approach in new General Ledger Accounting
Components
Financial Acounting
Asset Accounting
Controlling
Material Management
Others
Parallel accounts X X
Recommended approaches
In new General Ledger Accounting in SAP ERP, the approaches using parallel
ledgers or parallel accounts are equivalent in terms of the results produced. Which
approach is applied depends on each customer's situation.
Parallel accounts in SAP ERP prove just as powerful as parallel accounts in classic
General Ledger Accounting in SAP R/3.
Parallel ledgers in SAP ERP are much better than the combination of classic
General Ledger Accounting and Special Purpose Ledgers in SAP R/3.
Pure
Pure IFRS Local GAAP
Accounts Accounts
Common
Accounts
Items with significant valuation differences are posted to different accounts. Each valuation
has its own set of pure accounts.
Since each set must be in balance, extra care must be taken to ensure correct account
determination: establish an accounting guideline!
A 1 0 xxxxxx Common 0
accounts
B 2 1 xxxxxx IFRS accounts 1
C 3 2 xxxxxx Local accounts 2
(Receivable) (Payable)
Clearing Account Fix Asset Revenue Fix Asset Clearing Account Fix Asset
Retirement Retirement Retirement
If no ledger group is specified during document entry: Posting is done to all defined GL ledgers
Ledger A
Entry View Ledger B Ledger C
(IFRS)
BKPF / BSEG (Local GAAP) (Tax)
(leading ledger)
2014 SAP AG or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. Public 10
Parallel Ledgers
Operative postings updating all G/L ledgers
Specifying a ledger group during document entry: Posting is done to specific ledgers
Ledger A
Entry View Ledger B Ledger C
(IFRS)
BKPF / BSEG (Local GAAP) (Tax)
(leading ledger)
2014 SAP AG or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. Public 11
Approach and Valuation effect on number of postings
Same approach and valuation
3. Different approaches
=> Only one posting to local or IFRS accounts or ledgers
Financial Leasing
Depreciation Financial Leasing
IFRS IFRS Only one
(1) 1000 1000 (1)
posting
Account approach
A valuation area is assigned to certain target accounts that belong to the specific
accounting principle.
The valuation report (Classic G/L -> SAPF100, New G/L -> FAGL_FC_Valuation)
has to be run for each valuation area.
Ledger approach
Determination of the ledger group using the assignment of the
valuation area to an accounting principle that is assigned to a target ledger group.
N:1 N:1
Valuation area ----> Accounting principle ----> Ledger group
The valuation report (FAGL_FC_Valuation) has to be run for each valuation area.
2014 SAP AG or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. Public 18
Foreign Currency Valuation in FI-CA
In the FI-CA application component, open items that are posted in a foreign currency may
be valuated using different accounting views.
Account approach
Customizing in FI-CA: Assignment of the adjustment accounts to a valuation area
The valuation report has to be run for each valuation area.
Ledger approach
Customizing in FI-CA: Assignment of the adjustment accounts to a valuation area.
N:1
Valuation area ----> Ledger group
Account approach:
Assignment of different accounts using valuation areas.
Run Transaction F107 for each valuation area.
Ledger approach:
Assignment of ledger group using valuation areas
N:1 N:1
Valuation area ----> Accounting principle ----> Ledger group
Run Transaction F107 for each valuation area.
Receivables/Payables
FAS 52 requires that the valuation result in the functional currency be translated into the
reporting currency.
Account approach:
Assignment of different accounts depending on the valuation area.
The program is run for each valuation area.
Ledger approach in new General Ledger Accounting:
Assignment of valuation area to accounting principle to ledger group
N:1 N:1
Transaction FAGLF101 in New G/L has to be run for each valuation area.
In Classic G/L transaction F103 has to be run for each provision method.
Account approach:
The special G/L transaction represents a type of account approach.
Ledger approach:
Provision methods can be defined by valuation area.
N:1 N:1
Valuation area ----> Accounting principle ----> Ledger group
Ledger approach
Assignment of ledger group using valuation areas
In the results analysis, different results analysis versions can be used to view down payments
differently. For example, down payments that have already been received can be considered
revenue in results analysis and thereby reduce the revenue in excess of billings. This is
achieved in transaction OKG3 by setting the "Commitments" indicator (methods G-K).
With the "G" indicator, two results analysis categories are calculated and updated: category
ANKB (down payments reduce revenue in excess of billings) and category ANUS (down
payment surplus). When down payments reduce revenue in excess of billings, the amount of
the down payment cannot exceed the amount of revenue in excess of billings. The portion of the
down payment amount exceeding the revenue in excess of billings is transferred as down
payment surplus. In both cases, postings can be made to FI during the settlement of the
order/project.
Account approach:
Assignment of different accounts in Posting rules in WIP Calculation and Results Analysis (OKG8)
Ledger approach
Assignment of accounting principle in Posting rules in WIP Calculation and Results Analysis (OKG8)
For internal orders, sales orders, and projects carrying revenues, provisions can be created
by means of results analysis or WIP calculation.
Provisions are created for probable losses when the plan costs exceed the planned revenue. In the
subsequent periods, these provisions are automatically used until the complete amount has been
realized as a loss.
Provisions are created for uncovered costs when the calculated cost of sales exceeds the actual costs
(using results analysis) or when the credit amount exceeds the actual costs due to goods receipts (WIP
calculation). In the subsequent periods, these provisions are automatically used whenever subsequent
costs are incurred. The provisions are cancelled upon order completion.
Provisions for complaints and commission are created on the basis of planned costs for specific cost
elements. In the subsequent periods, these provisions are automatically used whenever costs are
incurred for these cost elements.
For all of these provisions, postings are created automatically in FI during settlement
(managed in transaction OKG8). A results analysis version can be created for each
accounting principle. In this way, the different results analysis versions can be used to create
different amounts of provisions that can then be used or cancelled when the order attains
different statuses.
With IFRS, results analysis is also used to make revenue postings (revenues in excess of
billings) automatically on the basis of the percentage of completion. If the revenues that are
actually made exceed the revenues determined, the revenue surplus is calculated and
transferred to FI as a provision.
Accruals and deferrals need to be allocated to the relevant periods. The use of parallel
accounting may mean that different accrual/deferral postings need to be made, depending on
the accounting principle.
Account approach:
Assignment of the accounts to a set of rules (such as accrual type)
The program (periodic accrual run) is run for each accrual type.
Ledger approach in new General Ledger Accounting:
Assignment of the accrual method to the accounting principle (determination of the
ledger group)
The program is run for each accounting principle.
Account approach:
Manual posting of provision amounts on different provision accounts
Ledger approach in new General Ledger Accounting:
With ERP 6.0 EHP3, manual processing of provisions (that is, manual posting and
clearing) for each ledger (only G/L accounts)
Asset Accounting
Usually only the leading ledger representing group accounting integrates with CO.
Thereby a consistent set of data all over the group for accounting and management
reporting purposes is ensured with the following benefits:
Data for controlling is derived from internationally comparable numbers which are unique within
the group.
Internationally comparable numbers are represented by the leading ledger.
Structuring costs by
Time FI-AA
Payroll FI Logistics Functional Area
sheet (depreciation)
Cost Center A
Cost Element Accounting
Cost Center B
..
Personnel costs
Cost Center Accounting
Structuring by
Cost Element
Material costs
Tax
Local GAAP
Balance Sheet (B/S) parallel valuation via
IFRS
WIP multiple results analysis versions
Usually only the leading ledger shall post to CO to have a consistent set of data
all over the group for accounting and management reporting purposes.
Data for controlling should be derived from international comparable
numbers within the group.
Usually the internationally comparable numbers are represented by the leading
ledger.
But there are some countries that require actual costs based on their country specific
law.
Brazil
Russia
Turkey
Also one industry specific regulation in USA is requiring actual costs
FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission)
The depreciation costs can be included in the activity rates for the work performed and in
the costs of goods manufactured, both of which are calculated at period close.
Ledger groups / accounts in FI-GL with inventory values calculated according to two
different valuation methods, can be updated. For example,
CO Version 0 represents the leading valuation (IFRS) Actual costs are calculated
using the periodic costing run and update inventory values in the leading ledger in FI-
GL.
Second CO Version represents the local valuation (GAAP), Actual costs are
calculated using an alternative valuation run and update inventory values in the local
ledger in FI-GL.
.
2014 SAP AG or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. Public 34
Parallel Accounting in Controlling
Parallel Valuation of Costs of Goods Manufactured (CoGM)
If your leading valuation is based on standard costs and your local valuation based on actual
costs then
CO Version 0 represents the leading valuation (IFRS) and is used to determine the standard
costs.
The second CO Version represents the local valuation (GAAP). Here you can use the
periodic costing run to update the inventory values in the local ledger in FI-GL.
Tax
Local GAAP
Balance Sheet (B/S) parallel valuation via
IFRS
WIP multiple results analysis versions
Ledger 0L Ledger N
(IFRS) (Local GAAP)
Version 0 Version N
Actual Costing
Y (par. COGM)
X
Periodic Costing Run (legal) OR
Updates either leading valuation or local valuation* (Actual rate) (Actual rate)
Business Requirement: Parallel reporting according to multiple accounting principles to reflect results of
different depreciation rules and for activation of costs in inventory and valuation of cost of goods sold
Solution: Post depreciation to cost centers into parallel actual versions in CO, calculate actual activity rates
based on depreciation, calculate parallel actual material prices in material ledger and revaluate inventory
and costs of goods sold.
Asset Accountant Financial Accountant Controller Controller
Customer
In CO parallelbusiness
actual versionschallenges
can be defined for up to 3 Business value
parallel valuations (valuations 5, 6 and 7).
In previous releases, only the values in the leading ledger Allows global manufacturing organizations to set activity
Operational postings are posted to all valuations
were transferred to controlling. Other values were prices that take account of depreciation according to IFRS
Some closing activities can post to a specific valuation
unavailable for controlling and therefore could not be used and local GAAP
Parallel actual activity
to determine valuations can and
prices be assigned
update to a valuation
inventory values
area of a valuation plan in asset accounting
for the goods manufactured.
Depreciation is posted by depreciation run to cost centers
with parallel values from parallel valuation areas.
Business Requirement: Parallel reporting according to multiple accounting principles to reflect results of
different depreciation rules and for activation of costs in inventory and valuation of cost of goods sold
Solution: Post depreciation to cost centers into parallel actual versions in CO, calculate actual activity rates
based on depreciation, calculate parallel actual material prices in material ledger and revaluate inventory
and costs of goods sold.
Asset Accountant Financial Accountant Controller Controller
Business Requirement: Parallel reporting according to multiple accounting principles to reflect results of
different depreciation rules and for activation of costs in inventory and valuation of cost of goods sold
Solution: Post depreciation to cost centers into parallel actual versions in CO, calculate actual activity rates
based on depreciation, calculate parallel actual material prices in material ledger and revaluate inventory
and costs of goods sold.
Asset Accountant Financial Accountant Controller Controller
Business Requirement: Parallel reporting according to multiple accounting principles to reflect results of
different depreciation rules and for activation of costs in inventory and valuation of cost of goods sold
Solution: Post depreciation to cost centers into parallel actual versions in CO, calculate actual activity rates
based on depreciation, calculate parallel actual material prices in material ledger and revaluate inventory
and costs of goods sold.
Asset Accountant Financial Accountant Controller Controller
Calculation can
Customer business
be performedchallenges
using the periodic costing run Business value
for the leading version 0, or if version 0 is used for reporting
at previous
In standard prices for one
releases, of the
only the values
parallel in
actual versions.ledger
the leading Allows global manufacturing organizations to set activity
If
were transferred
periodic to controlling.
costing run Other values
is used for version were
0, parallel actual prices that take account of depreciation according to IFRS
unavailable for controlling and therefore could notruns.
versions can be calculated with alternative valuation be used and local GAAP
Actual activity rates
to determine from
activity version
prices andare assigned
update to the costing
inventory values
runs. Cost centers are credited with the closing posting
for the goods manufactured.
Revaluation of Inventory and CoGS are posted to assigned
ledgers/accounts the original CO object only in version 0.
Ledger 0L Ledger N
(IFRS) (Local GAAP)
Version 0 Version N
Actual Costing
Y (par. COGM)
X
Periodic Costing Run (legal) OR
Updates either leading valuation or local valuation* (Actual rate) (Actual rate)
Asset Accounting
Controlling
In case that Material Ledger is activated a periodic unit price is calculated using the value
flows for the period. (Operational stock valuation with standard price)
Periodic actual costing run determines single and multilevel costs of all goods for each
period performs revaluation of stock, costs of goods sold and WIP at actual price
according to the leading accounting principle.
Alternative valuation runs are used to perform revaluation of stock, costs of good sold
and WIP according to non-leading accounting principles using alternative activity rates
and / or alternative material prices.
For balance sheet valuation based on actual costs basically the non leading valuation is
done be alternative valuation run (AVR) .
Account Solution
Customizing: Valuation correction Accounts have to be assigned to a account
modification
Classic AVR is used to do the necessary delta postings
COGM AVR can also be used with adequate BADI (Full Postings)
Ledger Solution
Customizing: Ledger groups have to be assigned to accounting principle
For classic AVR Valuation correction Accounts have to be assigned to
a account modification
For COGM AVR only the ledger group has to be assigned to an
accounting principle
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without the express permission of SAP AG or an
SAP affiliate company.
SAP and other SAP products and services mentioned herein as well as their respective logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of SAP AG
(or an SAP affiliate company) in Germany and other countries. Please see http://global12.sap.com/corporate-en/legal/copyright/index.epx for additional
trademark information and notices.
Some software products marketed by SAP AG and its distributors contain proprietary software components of other software vendors.
These materials are provided by SAP AG or an SAP affiliate company for informational purposes only, without representation or warranty of any kind,
and SAP AG or its affiliated companies shall not be liable for errors or omissions with respect to the materials. The only warranties for SAP AG or
SAP affiliate company products and services are those that are set forth in the express warranty statements accompanying such products and
services, if any. Nothing herein should be construed as constituting an additional warranty.
In particular, SAP AG or its affiliated companies have no obligation to pursue any course of business outlined in this document or any related
presentation, or to develop or release any functionality mentioned therein. This document, or any related presentation, and SAP AGs or its affiliated
companies strategy and possible future developments, products, and/or platform directions and functionality are all subject to change and may be
changed by SAP AG or its affiliated companies at any time for any reason without notice. The information in this document is not a commitment,
promise, or legal obligation to deliver any material, code, or functionality. All forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of their dates, and they should not be relied upon in making purchasing decisions.