Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Thermal expansion behaviour and mechanical performance of high temperature laser sintered PEK
Received 9 February 2015 (LS-PEK) and glass bead lled PEK composite (LS-GB/PEK) are reported and discussed for the rst time.
Revised 14 April 2015 The laser sintered PEK and its composite show anisotropic thermal expansion properties related with
Accepted 3 June 2015
their multilayer structure created by the laser sintering method. Compared with the PEK manufactured
Available online 19 June 2015
by conventional injection moulding (IM-PEK), LS-PEK has a 10% lower tensile strength but a higher hard-
ness due to its greater crystallinity. Addition of glass bead to PEK increases the hardness of PEK without
Keywords:
affecting the ultimate tensile strength and also improves the thermal stability of laser sintered parts. The
Laser sintering
Glass
rule of mixtures is applied to simulate the coefcient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the LS-GB/PEK
Polyetherketone composite structures and compare with experimental results. The measured CTE values match the
Thermal analysis calculated results below Tg and deviate slightly from the simulated trend line above Tg.
Thermal expansion 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Microstructure
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.005
0264-1275/ 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
546 Y. Wang et al. / Materials & Design 83 (2015) 545551
Review of literature showed that the majority of studies in the 2.3. Injection moulding
PAEK polymer family had been carried out on PEEK rather than PEK
or PEKK polymers. Although both polymers offer overall improved The material used for injection moulding was VICTREX HT G22
performance, the difference in chemical structure leads to higher pellets (melt viscosity = 220 Pa s). VICTREX HT G22 is equivalent
melting temperatures and glass transition temperatures for PEK to EOS PEK HP3. The pellets were dried for 5 h at 120 C. Dog bone
(Tm = 372 C, Tg = 164 C) over PEEK (Tm = 343 C, Tg = 143 C) samples were manufactured as per manufacturer specications
[3]. The lower melting and glass transition temperatures of PEEK (see Section 2.2). The nozzle temperature was 400 C, injection
allowed its easier implementation in manufacturing processes hydraulic pressure was 900 bars for 2 s, the holding hydraulic pres-
and therefore it was preferred over PEK, even though, ultimately, sure was 900 bars; injection speed was 60 cm3 s1 and the cooling
PEK is a stronger material. Although the primary aim of this study time was 15 s. The injection moulding samples were used for
was to further improve thermal stability of PEK through incorpora- benchmarking.
tion of glass beads, the new material will also have cost benets
(reduced price of the resulting LS component due to less use of 3. Experimental methods
PEK material).
3.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
2. Manufacturing
Microstructure analysis of glass beads, PEK powders and the
2.1. Preparation of powder for high temperature laser sintering fracture surface of samples were carried out by scanning electron
microscopy SEM (Hitachi S-3200N, Japan). The secondary electron
The HP3 PEK powder supplied by EOS (melt viscosity = 190 Pa s) images were taken under 25 kV acceleration voltage in the low
was mixed with Potters Spheriglass 2000 CP3 glass beads in a vacuum chamber with pressure of 50 Pa.
80/20% (PEK/Glass) by weight mixing ratio. The glass beads used
in this study are solid glass beads. The mixing of glass and PEK 3.2. Wide Angle X-Ray Diffractometry (WAXD)
powder was carried out using an EOS electric powder roller mixer
for 1 h in a 15 l drum. The WAXD measurements were performed with a Bruker D8
Advance WAXD with copper anode at room temperature. XRD data
2.2. High temperature laser sintering were collected in the angular range where 2h = 1032. The step
size of 2h was 0.01. Al2O3 was used as a standard sample to
The LS process was carried out in a reduced build mode using the measure the instrumental line broadening and to calibrate the
EOSINT P800 system [23]. The parts were built in the shape of dog diffractometer. The percentage relative crystallinity (% Xc) of
bone geometries 80 10 4 mm, according to ISO527-2 test various samples and their lamellar thickness (L) were calculated
specimen type 1BA. The position of the parts within the build from Eqs. (1) and (2):
chamber is shown in Fig. 1. The system went through a warm up
stage where it gradually increased the temperature of the base X c Ac =Ac Aa 100% 1
powder to the 368 C process temperature under an inert gas atmo- L Kk=FWs cos h 2
sphere. After completion of the warm up stage the EOSINT P800
started the laser sintering build stage. During the laser sintering where Ac is area of crystalline phase, As is area of amorphous phase,
process the powder was applied to the bed by means of a recoating and k is the wavelength of the copper anode (0.154 nm), K is con-
mechanism to give a layer thickness of 0.12 mm. The parts were stant (K = 1) and FW(s) is the specimen peak broadening at half
then scanned using the CO2 laser at 15 W power and 2250 mm s1 the maximum intensity (FWHM) in radians.
scanning speed. Once sintered, the material went through a
post-cure stage where the powder layer was exposed to thermal 3.3. Thermal expansion measurements
radiation for a further 12 s to enhance the fusion between powder
grains. The piston then dropped by the layer thickness and the For thermal expansion tests, the dog bone shaped parts were
recoating mechanism applied the next layer of powder. On cut down into cubic specimens of approximate 3 3 3 mm.
completion of the build the machine entered a cool down stage. The measurements were made in all three directions X, Y and Z
The parts were then cooled down to room temperature [23]. in order to determine the thermal expansion dependence of the
building direction. For LS samples, the X, Y and Z directions as a sintered PEK and GB/PEK composite. For comparison purposes,
function of the building direction are shown in Fig. 1. For the injec- the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and Vickers hardness results
tion moulded samples, X, Y and Z directions represent the width, of IM-PEK, LS-PEK and LS-GB/PEK composite are listed in
length and thickness of the sample, respectively. For each type of Table 1(a). Amongst the three types of samples, the IM-PEK had
sample, three repeat tests were performed on three different spec- the highest UTS but the lowest Vickers hardness. All laser sintered
imens. Specimens were annealed in oven for 1 h at 160 C to specimen show less percentage of strain than injection moulded
release any internal stress before conducting thermal expansion ones at break. Addition of the glass beads to the PEK powder in
measurements. Thermal expansion tests were conducted in a the laser sintering process neither reduced nor increased its tensile
Mettler Toledo TMA 40. A negligible force of 0.002 N was applied strength. This suggests a good interfacial bonding between the
using a 3 mm at quartz probe. To obtain the accurate coefcient glass beads and the matrix and indicates that the glass beads used
of thermal expansion, two heating cycles were applied on each were not at a critical size distribution or weight fraction to inu-
specimen. In the rst heating cycle, specimens were heated from ence positively or negatively the failure mechanisms and the
30 C to 300 C at a heating rate of 5 C min1 in air, held at strength [25]. The variance of UTS was higher for laser sintered
300 C for 10 min, then cooled down to 50 C at 10 C min1 cool- samples, as they were built along various directions.
ing rate. During the second heating cycle, the specimens were The LS-GB/PEK composite showed a 7% increase in hardness
heated from 50 C to 300 C at 5 C min1 in air. The thermal scan when compared with LS-PEK and a 24% increase when compared
recorded during the second heating cycles were used to calculate with IM-PEK. The presence of the glass beads increased the hard-
the CTE below glass transition temperature, ag, and the CTE above ness of the LS-GB/PEK composite; the hardness values obtained
glass transition temperature, ac. from the composite representing an average measurement of the
manufactured samples incorporating both components (glass and
3.4. Mechanical testing PEK). It is interesting to notice that depending on the manufactur-
ing process applied, the hardness of the same material (PEK) is sig-
The tensile tests were performed on a Lloyds EZ20 machine nicantly different, LS-PEK having an approximately 18% increase
with a crosshead speed of 2 mm min1 for all samples. 20 samples in hardness compared with IM-PEK samples. This is believed to
were tested. be the result of the two very different cooling regimes introduced
Hardness testing was performed on a digital micro-hardness tes- by the two manufacturing processes which lead to different crys-
ter FM-1e (Future-Tech Crop., Japan) the indentation force used was tallinities and crystal morphology. For example, Stuart and
300 gf, 10 s. The lengths of diagonal left by the indenter were mea- Briscoe [26] noticed that the hardness of crystalline PEEK is signif-
sured, and the Vickers hardness (HV) was calculated from Eq. (3): icantly higher than that of the amorphous PEEK material, while Lu
2 and Friedrich [18] also concluded that the spherulite size of PEEK
HV 1:854F=d 3 inuenced the hardness and ultimately the friction and wear
where F is the force in K gf applied to the diamond and d is the aver- performance.
age length of the diagonal left by the indenter in mm.
4.3. Microstructure of LS-PEK and LS-GB/PEK composite
4. Results and discussion
4.3.1. LS-PEK
4.1. Characterization of the raw materials The fracture surface of LS-PEK in Fig. 4(a)(d) shows a
multi-layered structure consisting of two distinct morphologies:
Fig. 2(a) and (b) shows the SEM images of glass beads and PEK (1) a homogeneously sintered structure approximately 80 lm
powder, respectively. The glass beads have almost perfect spherical thick, where the presence of individual particles is lost completely
shape, while the PEK powders have a ake like appearance. and (2) a dense and fully sintered layer where the presence of indi-
Previous particle analysis [24] of HP3 PEK powder showed that vidual particles is still clearly visible with an average thickness of
50% volume frequency had particle size in range of 37.563 lm 40 lm. For clarity and ease of discussion, the two morphologies
whereas the glass beads, 52% volume frequency had diameter in will be referred to as melted layer 1 and particle layer 2.
range of 1627.5 lm. In spite of its irregular shape, the HP3 PEK Considering that the combined thickness of the two layers is
powder dispersed well during manufacture. The addition of the approximately 120 lm, it is assumed that layer 1 and layer 2 form
glass beads however improved further the ow and spreading one LS layer spread during the sintering process. Fig. 4(e) gives a
characteristics of powder in laser sintering process. schematic representation of this phenomenon. A similar structure
(Fig. 5) has been noticed by Zarringhalam et al. [27] when investi-
4.2. Mechanical performance gating the microstructure of laser sintered nylon 12. The authors
referred to unmelted particle cores surrounded by melted and
Fig. 3(a) and (b) shows the stressstrain curve, tensile strength crystallised region when investigating particles noticed here in
and hardness of injection moulded PEK specimens and laser particle layer 1. The authors were able to correlate the layering
Fig. 2. (a) SEM image of glass beads, (b) SEM image of the PEK powder and (c) fracture surface of LS-GB/PEK composite.
548 Y. Wang et al. / Materials & Design 83 (2015) 545551
Fig. 3. (a) The stressstain curves and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) result of IM-PEK, LS-PEK and LS-GB/PEK composite and (b) the Vickers hardness (HV) of IM-PEK, LS-PEK
and LS-GB/PEK composite.
Table 1 layer has been sintered and a new layer of powder is applied, the
(a) Tensile strength, Vickers hardness, crystallinity%, averaged lamellar thickness and particles in the previous layer cooled to such an extent that bond-
CTE of PEK powder, IM-PEK, LS-PEK and LS-GB/PEK composite and (b) peak position
ing between particles in different layers is signicantly lower than
and FWHM of crystal planes of IM-PEK, LS-PEK and LS-GB/PEK.
the particle bonding between or within vectors. Due to this reason,
IM-PEK LS-PEK LS-GB/PEK increasing energy input can help diminish creation of large differ-
(a) ences between X, Y and Z but cannot eliminate them completely.
Tensile strength (MPa) 97.7 0.85 87.6 7.2 89.5 5.1 The layered structure and weaker mechanical performance in Z
Vickers hardness 24.9 0.5 30.2 0.4 32.6 0.5
direction is an inherent effect of the manufacturing process.
Crystallinity% (XRD) 40.2 53.3 51.6
Average lamellar thickness (nm) 9 15 15 Nylon, a well-researched and optimised polymeric material for
ag-x (ppm C1) 52.3 1.7 51.0 0.82 45.3 0.47 laser sintering showed a difference of 16% in tensile strength in
ag-y (ppm C1) 49.3 0.94 51.0 0.82 45.0 0.82 the X, Y and Z axes [28]. Previous study on laser sintered HP3
ag-z (ppm C1) 49.3 1.25 49.0 0.82 44.7 0.94 PEK showed a signicantly higher difference in tensile strength
ar-x (ppm C1) 138.3 0.94 138.7 2.36 116.3 0.47
ar-y (ppm C1) 135.7 6.13 136.3 1.25 116.0 0.82
amongst the three directions [29] (approx. 50%), which could the
ar-z (ppm C1) 141.0 0.00 124.0 2.45 105.3 3.30 result of the higher processing temperatures and therefore higher
thermal gradients between layers in Z axis.
IM-PEK LS-PEK LS-GB/PEK
Crystal plane 2h FWHM 2h FWHM 2h FWHM 4.3.2. LS-GB/PEK composite
(b) The fractured surface of the LS-GB/PEK composites presented in
[1 1 0] 18.268 0.71 18.639 0.49 18.615 0.49 Fig. 1(c), shows a good interface bonding between the glass beads
[1 1 1] 20.195 1.07 20.568 0.60 20.552 0.65 and PEK matrix, the glass beads were embedded in the polymer
[2 0 0] 22.406 1.20 22.837 0.81 22.855 0.85
matrix without being damaged or pulled out. The coating on the
[2 1 1] 28.193 1.46 28.671 0.84 28.63 0.74
glass beads is designed to promote the adhesion with polymers
with polar function groups such as ether, esters, amides, ketones,
and sulphone [30]. PEK have ether and ketones groups therefore
effect with a double melting peak in the DSC thermograms, where
it is compatible with the coating on the glass beads.
a high peak represented large amounts of un-melted material, and
a low peak was representative of a more complete melting. They
also introduced the terminology of degree of particle melt 4.4. Crystallinity and morphology
(DPM) when discussing the layering effect similar to the one
noticed here. Ajoku et al. [28] explained clearly the bonding mech- Fig. 6 presents the WAXD spectra of the injection moulded PEK
anisms and temperature differences that take place between vec- and high temperature laser sintered PEK and GB/PEK composite
tors and layers and led to the layered structure. The neck growth samples. Reections of crystal planes [31] 1 1 0, 1 1 1, 2 0 0, 1 1 2,
is signicantly smaller in Z direction than X and Y axes. Once a 2 1 1 and 0 2 0 are indexed in the gure. Table 1(b) shows the peak
Y. Wang et al. / Materials & Design 83 (2015) 545551 549
Fig. 4. (a) Fractured surface of LS-PEK samples showing a multi-layered structure, (bd) high magnication images of the multi-layered structure and (e) schematic
illustration of the multi-layered structured developed during the LS method.
5. Conclusions
[12] Engineering Materials Magazine, Thermoplastics to Revolutionise the [23] O.R. Ghita, E. James, K.E. Evan, Physico-chemical behaviour of Poly (Ether
Composite Industry, June 2013 <http://www.materialsforengineering.co.uk/ Ketone) (PEK) in high temperature laser sintering (HT-LS), J. Mater. Process.
engineering-materials-features/thermoplastics-to-revolutionaise-the-composites- Technol. 214 (2014) 969978.
industry/52151>. [24] S. Berretta, O.R. Ghita, K.E. Evans, Morphology of polymeric powders in laser
[13] High Performance Composites Magazine, Thermoplastic Composites: sintering (LS): from polyamide to new PEEK powders, Eur. Polym. J. 59 (2014)
Primary Structure? May 2011 <http://www.compositesworld.com/articles/ 218229.
thermoplastic-composites-primary-structure>. [25] H.H. Kausch, Ph. Beguelin, M. Fischer, Failure of particulate reinforced
[14] K. Bassett, R. Carriveau, S.K.D. Ting, 3D printed wind turbines part 1: design polymers, Mech. Compos. Mater. 36 (2000) 177184.
considerations and rapid manufacture potential, Sust. Energy Technol. Assess. [26] B.H. Stuart, B.J. Briscoe, Scratch hardness studies of poly(ether ether ketone),
(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2015.01.002. Polymer 37 (1996) 38193824.
[15] P. Strom, Dynamic vehicle weight reduction and safety enhancement, SAE Int. [27] H. Zarringhalam, C. Majewski, N. Hopkinson, Degree of particle melt in Nylon-
J. Passeng. Cars-Mech. Syst. 1 (2009) 12021207. 12 selective laser-sintered parts, Rapid Prototyp. J. 15 (2009) 126132.
[16] D. Cooper, J. Thornby, N.R. Blundell, R. Henrys, M.A. Williams, G. Gibbons, [28] U. Ajoku, N. Saleh, N. Hopkinson, R. Hague, P. Erasenthiran, Investigating
Design and manufacture of high performance hollow engine valves by additive mechanical anisotropy and end-of-vector effect in laser-sintered nylon parts,
layer manufacturing, Mater. Des. 69 (2015) 4445. Proc. IMechE, Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 220 (2006) 10771086.
[17] J.A. Barnes, I.J. Simms, G.J. Farrow, D. Jackson, G. Wostenholm, B. Yates, [29] O.R. Ghita, E. James, R. Davies, S. Berretta, B. Singh, S. Flint, K.E. Evans, High
Thermal expansion characteristics of PEEK composites, J. Mater. Sci. 26 (1991) temperature laser sintering: an investigation into mechanical properties and
22592271. shrinkage characteristics of poly (ether ketone) structures, Mater. Des. 61
[18] Z.P. Lu, K. Lu, On sliding friction and wear of PEEK and its composites, Wear (2014) 124132.
181183 (1995) 624631. [30] High Performance Solid Glass Polymer Additives, Engineered Glass Materials
[19] C.L. Choy, W.P. Leung, C. Nakafuku, Thermal expansion of poly (ether-ether- Division, Technical Datasheet, Potters Industries LLC.
ketone) (PEEK), J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 28 (1990) 19651977. [31] P.C. Dawson, D.J. Blundell, X-ray data for poly(aryl ether ketones), Polymer 21
[20] H. Voss, K. Friedrich, On the wear behaviour of short bre reinforced PEEK (1980) 577578.
composites, Wear 116 (1987) 118. [32] R.J. Sarasua, P.M. Remiro, Effects of thermal history on mechanical behavior of
[21] T. Snmazcelik, T. Ylmaz, Thermal aging effects on mechanical and tribological PEEK and its short-ber composites, J. Polym. Compos. 17 (1996) 468477.
performance of PEEK and short ber reinforced PEEK composites, Mater. Des. [33] Materials Datasheet of EOS High Temperature Polymer PEEK HP3, EOS, 2013
28 (2007) 641. <http://www.eos.info/material-p>.
[22] J. Wippl, H.W. Schmidt, R. Giesa, High temperature thermosets with a low
coefcient of thermal expansion, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 290 (2005) 657668.