You are on page 1of 448

Alias PublicConsultationTransparencyRegisterMarch-2016

Export Date 6/7/2016 10:52

Are you responding asI am a resident in (onl Please provide your ReName of the organisati
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 952322311484-70 EDSO FOR SMART GR
An individual in my pers Luxembourg
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 697519611807-33 Young Pirates of Europe
The representative of an organisation registered Europ6311034489 Fur Europe
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Croatia
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Lithuania
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 493652216941-84 Eesti Advokatuur (Eston
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Som Energia sccl
The representative of an organisation registered 886047218985-67 ACUDE - Asociacion de
The representative of an organisation registered 171767211533-02 Fdration europenne d
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Other country
An individual in my pers Hungary
An individual in my pers Malta
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 013953215837-21 Bernd Schnittler Consul
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Other country
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 18823402664-60 bulgarian society for rail
The representative of an organisation registered 43691777818-34 Federation of European
The representative of an organisation registered 460594519070-95 Adaptant Solutions AG
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 826843613782-52 Beruf5213132544
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 923186120002-37 CAMERA DE COMERT SI
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 6113045396-06 Fdration nationale de
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 9435658947-27 Direct Selling Europe (
The representative of an organisation registered 52277883476-14 ANITA
An individual in my pers Greece
The representative of an organisation registered 08614897787-35 ASOCIACIN DIANOVA
The representative of an organisation registered 331200913549-94 INTERBOR
The representative of an organisation registered 916169012106-53 iptsat
An individual in my pers Greece
The representative of an organisation registered 13097896529-66 Fortzer
The representative of an organisation registered 98782194744-29 Harmoni
The representative of an organisation registered 881983612196-94 Association Europenn
The representative of an organisation registered 834691420437-87 Unifly
The representative of an organisation registered Inter2514713140 IAAP
The representative of an organisation registered 250843310363-42 Asociacin de Tcnicos S
The representative of an organisation registered 2837382374-72 Coimbra Group
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 264048311507-68 Ocean Energy Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 329754520360-51 Davenport McKesson Cor
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 294072819611-29 Stratgies Mer et Littora
The representative of an organisation registered 129549620339-03 UNPACT
The representative of an organisation registered 171425020168-34 Asociacin Europea de I
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 071056710698-89 AVEVY
The representative of an organisation registered 90243962161.04 CAPA-Cooperativa dos A
The representative of an organisation registered 54373984497-13 Cabinet Tauthui & Assoc
The representative of an organisation registered 22551429377-07 VAT Practitioners Group
The representative of an organisation registered 43906893904-1 eurolobby
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Romanian Asociation fro
The representative of an organisation registered 794286420808-77 European Economic Cha
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Hungary
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 12749675101-70 ECIROA = European Capt
The representative of an organisation registered 025475014255-64 AICO EDV-Beratung G
The representative of an organisation registered 49149349131-64 MIQUEL ANGEL VALLES
The representative of an organisation registered 807981018372-79 Alliance for Democracy
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 29970752834-36 Bundesverband Baustoffe
The representative of an organisation registered 013394611927-62 the International Center
The representative of an organisation registered 954282520923-24 Juan Jose Mulero Orteg
The representative of an organisation registered 638820912393-43 European Elite Athletes
The representative of an organisation registered 657585813025-52 NURSING UP IL SINDA
The representative of an organisation registered 697065015056-39 Promote Ukraine
The representative of an organisation registered 636752920377 TB Alliance
The representative of an organisation registered 502042412304-13 CONUSBAT Regulatory
The representative of an organisation registered 48720121070-58 Coord451599218
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 611206918763-57 H-Comp Consultiung
The representative of an organisation registered 25034761081714 dipartimento europeo si
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 249230517253-41 Mas Avenir
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 1412BRU00313 FREDERIC MAURO SP
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered Ass8614650577 Associazione Europea Fe
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 698412320216-92 Financiar Acces SRL
The representative of an organisation registered 116915712797-73 Asociatia pentru Promo
The representative of an organisation registered 597848518285-91 EbiGU Engagierte Brge
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 5903604107-54 Taxpayers Association o
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 963162918784-50 UNIN GENERAL DE
The representative of an organisation registered 850749020806-53 GAL Eloro
An individual in my pers Cyprus
The representative of an organisation registered Asoci259382753 Asociatia Heidenroslein
The representative of an organisation registered 94837329683-94 International Associatio
The representative of an organisation registered 16549972091-86 AGE Platform Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 50318109352-58 CEREPPOL
The representative of an organisation registered 602795316790-45 Kooperation deutscher Ti
The representative of an organisation registered 505188620414 Asociatia Romana pent
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation registered 077706416598-79 COTANCE
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered Eolos1614701280 E-olo srl
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 468545220718-02 S3PCIMEX
An individual in my pers Greece
The representative of an organisation registered 731027919621 04 Giuseppe Lettini
The representative of an organisation registered 75895344258-05 Pohjois-Pohjanmaan lintu
An individual in my pers Czech Republic
The representative of an organisation registered 237806117704-74 EPPOSI
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 673491614416-62 ITALPOLLINA S.p.A.
The representative of an organisation registered 1404621848-82 Safeguard for Agricultura
The representative of an organisation registered 757674714316-65 Dngekalk-Hauptgemein
The representative of an organisation registered 87365826901-63 Tecnalia
The representative of an organisation registered Deuts0114329849 DPRG
The representative of an organisation registered 631025116128-79 European Medical Stude
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency ethic srls
The representative of an organisation registered 551463820607-31 European Osteopaths
The representative of an organisation registered 79639147194-11 Alkedo
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency O3 Makes free - O3 Mach
The representative of an organisation registered 58165854227-94 European league for the
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 024432110419-97 Liechtenstein Bankers A
The representative of an organisation registered 712956418144 Ecolog
The representative of an organisation registered 75964025885-59 European Mobile Seed A
The representative of an organisation registered 873181915791-38 Danske Medier
The representative of an organisation registered 8203543301-90 EWIMA (European Writing
The representative of an organisation registered 582768716033-06 ageas SA/NV
The representative of an organisation registered 62975755109-62 Mutuelle d'Assurance de
The representative of an organisation registered 434875112121-60 Fire Safety Platform
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 46864329475-46 Rechtsanwalt Anton Sch
The representative of an organisation registered 50874201390-43 Chemical Business Assoc
The representative of an organisation registered 244874814189-27 Vetcel Ltd
The representative of an organisation registered 860456882255-44 ASSOCIATION OF ACC
The representative of an organisation registered 57596413786-53 Europische Metall Uni
The representative of an organisation registered 15086733813-03 Confdration europenne
The representative of an organisation registered 573131319990-45 Universitatea Babe-Bol
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Vereniging van Leveran
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 153027416761-07 Centro Nazionale Sporti
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered Flori8814408586 Floricode
The representative of an organisation registered 93326299329-13 GE.SE.FI. onlus
The representative of an organisation registered 888-89756-78 OMNICONSUL-Public Aff
The representative of an organisation registered 256252314853-30 European Council for St
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered Gesel104428383 Gesellschaft zur Rettung
The representative of an organisation registered 739094715664-45 Association Europenne
The representative of an organisation registered 50878746386-39 Deutscher Brauer-Bund
The representative of an organisation registered 555632318779-09 Badai
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Samband slenskra sveita
The representative of an organisation registered 759449112185-60 bc berger Communicati
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 09688752938-96 Mouvement europen-Fran
The representative of an organisation registered 0893446630-97 Danish District Heating
An individual in my pers Romania
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Pirate Lobby
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered Proto0714350916 protocol international
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation registered 07483302972-25 Diakonie Deutschland E
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 128369815165-36 ASOCIACION AFECTAD
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency public matters
The representative of an organisation registered 64226865049-04 Europische Akademie
The representative of an organisation registered 846740410675-03 Europe Culture et Citoy
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 03451096957-77 European Salt Producers
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 872332582-69 BERNARDI EUGENIO
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Cyprus
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 3265773534-15 AREPO
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency vis helvetica
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Luxembourg
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 625976815556-92 Agriculture and Horticu
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Region Hannover
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Sweden
The representative of an organisation registered Consi8114789389 Considera
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 488324411347-10 British Marine
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Slovak Republic
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 48849298417-82 Zimmer Biomet Holdings
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Portugal
The representative of an organisation registered 31662245786-54 REA RADIOTELEVISIO
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency DKT Consulting Ltd
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
The representative of an organisation registered 255886420598-33 National Association of
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 11458103335-07 EGEC
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Greece
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Validee
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Other country
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Latvia
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Denmark
The representative of an organisation registered 24516996887-24 European Region of the
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Luxembourg
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Romania
An individual in my pers Romania
An individual in my pers Romania
An individual in my pers Finland
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Lithuania
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 0584121345-92 Ausstellungs- und Messe
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Romania
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Latvia
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 260615613726-15 Colegio Profesional de
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 465 308 314 12-96 Brot fr die Welt
An individual in my pers Austria
The representative of an organisation registered 58204758673-16 MasterCard Europe
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 785683118324-55 CONSELL GENERAL DE
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 74989093163-18 European Boating Indus
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Romania
The representative of an organisation registered 034546859-02 Independent Retail Eur
The representative of an organisation registered 20705158207-35 Danish Bankers Associa
The representative of an organisation registered 5378003762-62 Toyota Motor Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 94607479886-02 AMUNDI
The representative of an organisation registered 84973761187-60 EuroCommerce A.I.S.B.
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation registered Cmar502566136 Cmara Oficial de Comer
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Other country
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Celle
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 255298920864-73 Willem Scholten consult
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 14575766603-44 European Organisation o
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Poland
The representative of an organisation registered 35279857524-58 European Movement Inte
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 48703695391-16 CRUAAS & ASOCIAD
The representative of an organisation registered 84768556104-35 Foreign Trade Associati
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 46742654343-05 Golf Europe
An individual in my pers Croatia
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Other country
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered Iheeu2414651675 IHE-Europe
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 32814201372-84 European Aerosol Feder
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Other country
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Unna
The representative of an organisation registered 4016736872-59 General Electric Compa
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Czech Republic
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Denmark
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency StdteRegion Aachen
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Ireland
The representative of an organisation registered 22169245489-60 Fdration Europenne d
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 5159980776-55 Eucolait - European Asso
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered PT5462241 GIRP - European Healthc
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Landshut
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Siegen-Wittgenste
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 04077716126-17 European Industrial Gas
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Poland
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Niederschsischer Landk
The representative of an organisation registered 444896420983-33 ALEXIS
The representative of an organisation registered 0757172464-29 GIRP - European Healthc
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 68270708350-60 International Associatio
The representative of an organisation registered 74255575543-90 ENVIRONMENTAL SERV
The representative of an organisation registered 596915820961-12 Young European Leader
The representative of an organisation registered 262072219982-51 B2EU Consulting
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Other country
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Groe Kreisstadt Hoyer
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Innsbruck
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Delmenhorst
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered Compa197989263 Compassion in World F
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 403181718710-11 SPP - distribcia, a.s.
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 607887719353-18 Dianova International
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 332026115325-38 FA - Finanssektorens Ar
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Viersen
The representative of an organisation registered 644841621368-72 Kowat Control Biomimt
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Rhein-Kreis Neuss - Der
The representative of an organisation registered FR-2008-BTQ-220752113 AITEC
An individual in my pers Cyprus
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Braunschweig
The representative of an organisation registered 42119616334-41 Food & Water Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 672204711627-29 EQAR
The representative of an organisation registered 150920420956-26 Association of Clinical
An individual in my pers Croatia
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Greece
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Krefeld
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Krefeld
The representative of an organisation registered 5891420216285 ANACOFI
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 782765412493-49 Associacion for Natural
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 25679671885-26 Federacin Digital EA
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Poland
The representative of an organisation registered 02452103934-97 ADAC e.V.
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Hildesheim
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Ireland
The representative of an organisation registered 635279821512-37 Law Firm Farcas-Nedelc
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 5189667783-94 Zentralverband des Deu
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 198687221531-48 Kinnegad Combined Co
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Gtersloh
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Der Regierende Brgerme
The representative of an organisation registered 2694372574-63 Alliance for Lobbying T
An individual in my pers Finland
The representative of an organisation registered Briti3514235153 British Specialist Nutriti
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Ireland
The representative of an organisation registered 94817271686270 Handwerkskammer Ulm
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Brogemeinschaft der E
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
The representative of an organisation registered 60975211600-74 Invest Europe
An individual in my pers Slovenia
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 338352318442-47 Hrvatska zajednica upa
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Polskie Towarzystwo Fil
The representative of an organisation registered 338352318442-47 Croatian County Associa
An individual in my pers Finland
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Offenbach
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency kunfud
An individual in my pers Finland
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Slovenia
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 62636428022-47 Provincie Noord Brabant
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Warendorf
The representative of an organisation registered 42433582-82 FORATOM
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Kleve - Der Landr
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Bezirk Schwaben
An individual in my pers Other country
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Slovak Republic
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Latvia
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 8491787572473 Bundesverband Deutsch
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Finland
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 3505006282-58 ABBL
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 6182372280-83 ALFI
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Czech Republic
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Lithuania
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 70041276286-89 Laroche Conseil
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Zavod Intitut za elektron
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Germany Brogemeinschaft der Europabros der bayerischen
An individual in my pers United Kingdom schsischen Kommunen (getragen durch die kommu
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Spitzenverbnde Bayerns, Baden-Wrttembergs und
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Altreonic NV
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Austria
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Mnchen, Mar
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Netherlands Brogemeinschaft der Europabros der bayerischen
An individual in my pers Germany schsischen Kommunen (getragen durch die kommu
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Spitzenverbnde Bayerns, Baden-Wrttembergs und
The representative of an organisation registered 777023714204-72 Baden-Wrttembergische
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Wesel
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 501222919-71 Transparency Internatio
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 888 89756-78 Omniconsul-Public Affai
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Landshut
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Greece
The representative of an organisation registered Munuc139524563 municipality of iraklio at
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Estonia
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Tiroler Gemeindeverban
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Stendal
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Department of Public E
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered Inter467774150 IFRA (International Frag
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Behrde
The representative of an organisation registered 12377856409-55 Union Nationale des Co
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 040632614929-26 Danske Havne
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Fietsersbond VZW
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Gemeinde Stanz bei La
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Marktgemeinde Kundl
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 19714485883-27 Lumina sprl
The representative of an organisation registered 23869471911-54 Bundesarbeitskammer s
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Gemeinde Volders
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Bayerische Staatsregier
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 953933297-85 AFEP (Association fran
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadtgemeinde Neuleng
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Heilbronn
The representative of an organisation registered 049793414915-58 Sicim Spa
The representative of an organisation registered 33561661927-40 Nanotechnology Industri
The representative of an organisation registered 074338911841-91 Rete nazionale operatori
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered NBQ TECHNOLOGY DIGITAL GROUP
The representative of an organisation registered 452046515134-42 Vigilis Politica
The representative of an organisation registered 820341581223-36 FUNDACIN CENTRO
The representative of an organisation registered 521341216901-93 EUROPORTE
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency ESTER Association
The representative of an organisation registered 190491021763-93 European Biomass Indus
The representative of an organisation registered Stich4714180391 Stichting EAPN Nederla
The representative of an organisation registered Flori8814408586 H.P. Zwinkels
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landratsamt Neu-Ulm
The representative of an organisation registered 806128721481-01 International Alliance of
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 171767211533-02 FEPS
The representative of an organisation registered 609300716175-67 CooperFin S.p.A.
The representative of an organisation registered 59893117192-26 International Public Rel
The representative of an organisation registered 43369406961-89 AKB
The representative of an organisation registered 911224720315-28 ICT Consultative Counci
The representative of an organisation registered 048261321501-53 Asociacion Oceanos de
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 95990808181-93 Hachiko vzw
The representative of an organisation registered 277619815968-37 RING Advocacy ApS
The representative of an organisation registered 153973318978-42 Bureau of International
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency WBO
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Association pour le D
The representative of an organisation registered 8247510907380 cabinet syldy consulting
The representative of an organisation registered 4263301811-33 Pfizer
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 86984114195-68 Federacin de ridos
The representative of an organisation registered 716747713857-35 BXL Europe asbl
The representative of an organisation registered 986218614620-17 Associazione per lo Svil
The representative of an organisation registered 080551814378-33
602423612814-80 Must & Partners
The representative of an organisation registered 191306718204-57 ZERYA Producciones sin
The representative of an organisation registered Fondazione Adkins Chiti
The representative of an organisation registered 582485310717-46 ETP-ZEP
The representative of an organisation registered 92876453439-40 European Large Familie
The representative of an organisation registered ROMAN378552291 ASOCIATIA AEROPORT
The representative of an organisation registered 95072484406-67 Stowarzyszenie zwyke
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 42967152383-63 EDA
The representative of an organisation registered 937012821700-96 Cx4
The representative of an organisation registered 88072891086-36 ECTAA - Group of Nation
The representative of an organisation registered 21280626733-05 Deutsches Zentrum fr
The representative of an organisation registered 59342921440-89 IARU-R1 Political Relat
An individual in my pers Other country
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Zwizek Rzemiosa Pols
The representative of an organisation registered 794286420808-77 European Economic Ch
The representative of an organisation registered 926528111241-47 PROGECOOP
The representative of an organisation registered Garbi0214791744 Garbionda
The representative of an organisation registered 643532821002-69 2m4
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 573365521161#78 Representative Office o
The representative of an organisation registered 711197015348-03 Irish Cattle & Sheep Far
The representative of an organisation registered 324317212105-48 Nucleo Guardia Ambient
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 98016578626-11 EGALE, Egalit-Lacit
The representative of an organisation registered 81494518538-75 Associazione Culturale
The representative of an organisation registered 248993414712-40 ENA - European Nursery
The representative of an organisation registered 327963813920-28 associazione internazio
An individual in my pers Denmark
The representative of an organisation registered 04742008958-57 danzaria
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 566077714587-83 Sogrape Vinhos SA
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 832642915261-54 Movimento Italiano in E
The representative of an organisation registered Inter906594107 International Services A
The representative of an organisation registered 047479520364-58 Associazione Europea Fe
The representative of an organisation registered 28175274067-75 EFFAB
The representative of an organisation registered 563400416574-89 Sveriges Bussresearran
The representative of an organisation registered 697065015056-39 Promote Ukraine
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered Slove7614514769 SAPIE
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered Europ528884314 European Heritage Lega
The representative of an organisation registered 265962718565-49 Dataskydd.net Sverige
The representative of an organisation registered 262987221791-87 ASINVER
The representative of an organisation registered 217065513622-24 KARL KRONER KG
The representative of an organisation registered 052007712004-80 European Parents Assoc
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation registered 30399232694-16 Ezstkanl Nyugdjas T
The representative of an organisation registered 472682242281-35 A.C.E. Consulting dba A
The representative of an organisation registered Peerc1214575154 Peercraft ApS
The representative of an organisation registered 049215512245-42 ACADEMY OF ENTREP
The representative of an organisation registered 59088181732-83 Sinop University Faculty
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 190071212051 Technetium Consulting
The representative of an organisation registered 687817721601-69 Bonnier Broadcasting
The representative of an organisation registered 798071410461-65 PRS for Music
The representative of an organisation registered 31462594848-53 Business Support Centr
The representative of an organisation registered Europ87310147 CETS
The representative of an organisation registered 230235714034-13 European Network on In
The representative of an organisation registered 340058514708-71 Frimstone Ltd
The representative of an organisation registered 70183498905-52 European Specialist Nur
The representative of an organisation registered Nordp5114618860 Nord Pool Spot
The representative of an organisation registered Liber696394138 Universit Popolare LU
The representative of an organisation registered 58165854227-94 European league for the
The representative of an organisation registered Europ7013568627 European Network on Rel
The representative of an organisation registered 990257116188-47 East of England Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 359307713029-55 activ fr alle - Integrati
The representative of an organisation registered 94837329683-94 International Assn for F
The representative of an organisation registered 78661496356-69 ATHENEUM LIBERAL S
The representative of an organisation registered 071056710698-89 Assoc0810372703
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered Fachv676172192 Austrian Association for
The representative of an organisation registered 39068194588-61 Fdration International
The representative of an organisation registered 4422649896-52 UECBV
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Zesp Aktywnoci Spo
The representative of an organisation registered 80248698067-50 German Hospital Federa
The representative of an organisation registered 571426515552-29 Allied Spectrum Associa
The representative of an organisation registered 156799113994-03 European Federation of
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 58744833263-19 Transport and Environme
The representative of an organisation registered Oromo4114628017 Oromo parliamentarians
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Wildschnau
The representative of an organisation registered 1404621848-82 SAVE-Foundation
The representative of an organisation registered 068890821527-53 CARMEN e.V.
The representative of an organisation registered 077706416598-79 COTANCE
The representative of an organisation registered 178831615858-62 anav
The representative of an organisation registered 053117613298-41 FEDIAF
The representative of an organisation registered 435130314953-28 A2 Policy Advice
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 24082737690-57 Towers Watson Limited
The representative of an organisation registered 001866415031-87 HSBC Holdings Plc
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 545283317403-97 FEDERAIA NAIONAL
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 67816104631-57 Handwerkskammer Frank
The representative of an organisation registered 28280717783-17 World Nuclear Council
The representative of an organisation registered 158241921709-39 Restarting the Future
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency TERUMO BCT
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 5353162366-85 Corporate Europe Obser
The representative of an organisation registered 428630719734-25 SMES-Europa
The representative of an organisation registered 204833515454-79 OPPORTUNITY ASBL
The representative of an organisation registered 675251413366-32 Danske Studerendes Fl
The representative of an organisation registered Confe7514226596 CONFEDERAO DO C
The representative of an organisation registered 608174919777-30 Beaulieu International
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 07055806769-32 BIBM
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Aichach-Fried
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Freising
The representative of an organisation registered 14766442240-14 Deutscher Verein fr ff
The representative of an organisation registered 412752013756-49 NEON
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Berchtesgade
An individual in my pers Ireland
The representative of an organisation registered 3978240953-79 BUSINESSEUROPE
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 66336536137-63 World Federation of Tour
The representative of an organisation registered 62036915250-25 Asociacin de Empresas
The representative of an organisation registered 47195853551-35 Asociacin Nacional de
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation registered 1771817758-48 Bundesverband der Deuts
The representative of an organisation registered 17839103549-54 Asociacin Nacional de
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 69321482460-90 Asociacin Nacional de
The representative of an organisation registered 39968323574-10 Asociacin de Armadore
The representative of an organisation registered 30045843550-37 Asociacin Nacional de
The representative of an organisation registered 15913213485-46 Pesticide Action Networ
The representative of an organisation registered 34954249295-81 VIK e.V. - Verband der In
An individual in my pers Romania
The representative of an organisation registered 69851845452-33 CFE-CGC ENERGIES
The representative of an organisation registered 93987316076-63 CEMBUREAU - The Euro
The representative of an organisation registered 928780213492-36 Interstedelijk Studenten
The representative of an organisation registered Feder5414402986 European Federation fo
The representative of an organisation registered 20210641335-88 Orgalime
The representative of an organisation registered 470080317320-90 Koreneef Public Affairs
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 50751211239-57 European Federation of
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Poland
The representative of an organisation registered Europ784410164 European Wax Federati
The representative of an organisation registered 009214311424-03 SEA Europe
An individual in my pers Poland
The representative of an organisation registered 0893446630-97 Danish District Heating
The representative of an organisation registered 0285583802-96 Naturschutzbund Deutsc
The representative of an organisation registered 15366395387-57 Nestl S.A.
The representative of an organisation registered 38091528151-27 European Respiratory S
The representative of an organisation registered 85235158413-79 Groupement des Cartes
The representative of an organisation registered 839751414764-22 European Card Payment
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Naturschutzbund Deuts
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Bundesstadt Bonn
The representative of an organisation registered 677743413396 EUROPEAN FEDERATIO
An individual in my pers Poland
The representative of an organisation registered 393445716716-91 AIRPORT OPERATORS
The representative of an organisation registered Branc6211380450 Branchevereniging VHG
The representative of an organisation registered 646022113355-88 Fdration des Industrie
The representative of an organisation registered 096124310820-70 Alma Mater Studiorum -
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Asociacin de Profesiona
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Delegation of Auvergne
The representative of an organisation registered 77105321408-83 FEFAC
The representative of an organisation registered 84839535366-67 Fdration International
The representative of an organisation registered 48544465107-88 Deutsche Post DHL Gro
The representative of an organisation registered 18941013532-08 European Public Health
The representative of an organisation registered 7574621118-27 Community of European
The representative of an organisation registered 69745087426-20 Fujitsu General Euro G
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Marktgemeinde Wllersd
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Marktgemeinde Grafenw
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Pforzheim
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Gemeinde Ottenthal
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency sterreichischer Stdte
The representative of an organisation registered 10405322962-08 Wirtschaftskammer ste
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Steinfurt
The representative of an organisation registered 0346440357-87 European Association of
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency EP intergroup on Integr
The representative of an organisation registered 06698681039-26 European Trade Union O
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadtgemeinde Litschau
The representative of an organisation registered 12493392840-79 EUROCITIES
The representative of an organisation registered 43763731235-75 Mouvement des entrepri
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Marktgemeinde Rabenst
The representative of an organisation registered 29840188581-12 SODEXO SA
The representative of an organisation registered 13795213569-71 Jeantet AARPI
The representative of an organisation registered 694466214317-80 Association Belge des C
The representative of an organisation registered 942748221075-81 GEM motors, innovative e
The representative of an organisation registered 457312321659-55 Grupo Ttico de Fora A
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Rural Education and Ag
The representative of an organisation registered 61973396926-78 EKD-Bro Brssel / EKD-
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 2349218828-41 Daimler AG
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 622451920058-29 VNCI
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 152131714573-59 Diplomat Consult S.R.L.
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 15066281874-49 Intellectual Property La
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 6439238521-03 ASEDIE, Asociacin Multi
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 53141413510-95 Grayling
The representative of an organisation registered 47350036909-69 Secretariat of COMECE
The representative of an organisation registered 6128433730-45. FEDECRAIL - European F
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 849925514506-35 Li Service
The representative of an organisation registered Initi6910072472 Initiative for the Develo
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kommune
The representative of an organisation registered 9737622425-76 Bundesarbeitsgemeinsch
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadtverwaltung Leipzig
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency N Gemeindebund
The representative of an organisation registered 7410939793-88 BASF SE
The representative of an organisation registered 11011208847-86 Glass and Glazing Feder
The representative of an organisation registered Regro718472728 REFORMED ou R.E.FO.R
The representative of an organisation registered 431222818523-35 Bund Getrnkeverpacku
The representative of an organisation registered 5749958415-41 Confederation of Danish
The representative of an organisation registered 60399267990-31 International Federation
The representative of an organisation registered 4447605981-76 Statoil ASA
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 43783176689-06 KL (Kommunernes Lands
The representative of an organisation registered 6437280268-55 Gesamtverband der Deut
The representative of an organisation registered 501222919-71 Transparency Internatio
The representative of an organisation registered 62460931291-40 Imperial Tobacco Group
The representative of an organisation registered 4760969620-65 Council of Bars and Law
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Convention of Scottish
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Public Relations
Transparency Consul
International Lithuanian
The representative of an organisation registered 501222919-71 Chapter
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 46856801604-90 OXFAM INTERNATIONA
The representative of an organisation registered 47676761061-93 VERBOND VAN BELGIS
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Campaign Against Arms
The representative of an organisation registered 9825553393-31 Friends of the Earth Eu
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 501222919-71 Transparency Internatio
The representative of an organisation registered 6637576125105 Grande Loge Fminine d
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Verein zur Frderung de
The representative of an organisation registered 644245448-07 UNIONE CAMERE ESPE
The representative of an organisation registered 39966101835-69 ELECTRICITE DE FRAN
The representative of an organisation registered 1496873833-97 Confederation of Europ
An individual in my pers Poland
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Sveriges Kommuner och L
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Komisija za prepreevan
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 38020227042-38 and 8 Law Society of England
The representative of an organisation registered 55481528937-66 Konferenz Europischer
The representative of an organisation registered 99127823248-77 Stefan Scheuer SPRL
The representative of an organisation registered 85717948337-22 Verband der Kali- und Sa
The representative of an organisation registered 20457441380-38 BDEW Bundesverband der
The representative of an organisation registered 121740613680-43 Portes Ouvertes
The representative of an organisation registered 78982871558-95 Deutscher Zigarettenver
The representative of an organisation registered 81142561702-61 Council of European Mu
The representative of an organisation registered 7824139202-85 EUROPEAN APPAREL A
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 9264296748-42 Society of European Aff
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Coalition of Association
The representative of an organisation registered 48849298417-82 Zimmer Biomet Holding
The representative of an organisation registered 9505781573-45 Bureau Europen des U
The representative of an organisation registered 501222919-71 Transparency Internatio
The representative of an organisation registered 39299129772-62 EurEau
An individual in my pers Other country
The representative of an organisation registered 198063521842-62 European Network Again
The representative of an organisation registered 13635802880-80 Henkel AG & CO KGaA
The representative of an organisation registered 790716210509-69 EU-Logos Athena
The representative of an organisation registered 8828523562-52 European Public Affairs
The representative of an organisation registered 0714344663-32 Lufthansa Group
The representative of an organisation registered 1274604847-34 Confederation of Finnish
The representative of an organisation registered 95574664768-90 Verband der Automobilind
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Association Franaise d
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 0138855852-93 European Smoking Tobac
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Marktgemeinde Grokru
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landeshauptstadt Stuttg
The representative of an organisation registered 99578067285-35 Eni
The representative of an organisation registered 76130992074-15 Gas Infrastructure Euro
The representative of an organisation registered 11063928073-34 Amnesty International Eu
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 22400601191-42 Deutscher Industrie- u
The representative of an organisation registered 635043818530-97 Croatian Banking Associ
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation registered 291870610961-51 Drutvo Ekologi brez me
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 1083162721-43 Stichting BirdLife Europ
The representative of an organisation registered 501222919-71 Transparency Internatio
The representative of an organisation registered 1849405799-88 Total S.A.
The representative of an organisation registered 686996021811-49 Associao Portuguesa
The representative of an organisation registered 191538712765-84 Wikimedia (Free Knowl
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Slovenia
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 6504541970-40 Volkswagen Aktiengesell
The representative of an organisation registered 905001612275-82 Enags S.A.
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 82936193787-44 Union des Entreprises
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Marktgemeinde St. Mart
The representative of an organisation registered 501222919-71 Transparency Internati
The representative of an organisation registered 27567784437-46 Tobaksindustrien
The representative of an organisation registered 34369111614-57 Socit Gnrale
The representative of an organisation registered 43785827982-59 UNI Europa
The representative of an organisation registered 7749519702-29 Bundesvereinigung der
The representative of an organisation registered 846795818801-87 Forum Umwelt und Entw
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 41816938101-07 IBERDROLA.SA
The representative of an organisation registered 24633926420-79 Better Finance, the Eur
The representative of an organisation registered 17804464809-28 Euronext
The representative of an organisation registered 968177917885-14 Employers' Confederatio
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Association de la Ville
The representative of an organisation registered 38526121292-88 European Federation of
The representative of an organisation registered 01546986656-22 European Alcohol Policy
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 92399882921-71
814721210555-72 EURALIA
UNIN ESPAOLA DE ENTIDADES ASEGURADO
The representative of an organisation registered
The representative of an organisation registered 022255314501-32 CIP - Confederao Empr
The representative of an organisation registered 5265780509-97 The American Chamber
The representative of an organisation registered 3373670692-24 European Fund and Ass
The representative of an organisation registered 68057486299-01 European Emergency Nu
The representative of an organisation registered 0649790813-47 ACEA
The representative of an organisation registered 68700057230-72 BIONTINO EUROPE
The representative of an organisation registered 75729476306-17 Wintershall Holding Gm
The representative of an organisation registered 94275086214-14
586970115022-56 FNTR
The representative of an organisation registered First Five Consulting
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Consiglio regionale del
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Bezirksverband Niederb
The representative of an organisation registered 71175716023-03 JT International S.A.
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Bamberg
The representative of an organisation registered 25412265365-88 Bundesrechtsanwaltsk
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency South Bohemian Region
The representative of an organisation registered 798404313938-50 UFIP
An individual in my pers Ireland
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency South Bohemian Region
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency BASE
The representative of an organisation registered 090350412968-04 Banco Bilbao Vizcaya A
The representative of an organisation registered 266727516639-73 50Hertz Transmission
The representative of an organisation registered 042383714852-64 Transdev Group
The representative of an organisation registered 64879142323-90 European Chemical Indus
The representative of an organisation registered 29642463540-93 sterreichischer Recht
The representative of an organisation registered 759842510633-18 FAU Bernard FVF AVO
The representative of an organisation registered 57238506728-24 Unin Profesional
The representative of an organisation registered 150480218577-06 Institute of Alcohol Stud
The representative of an organisation registered 27762251795-15 Confindustria - Confeder
The representative of an organisation registered 1414929419-24 WWF European Policy
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Palvelualojen ammattilii
The representative of an organisation registered 783456217223-84 CALIF
The representative of an organisation registered 783456217223-84 CALIF
The representative of an organisation registered 57238506728-24 Unin Profesional
- Croatian Association of Tenants EU Citizens
- Institute for Culture and Ethics
- Association for Self Advocacy
- Faculty of Political Science Student's Club
- Code for Croatia
- Documenta
The representative of an organisation registered 27799842497-69 -SUEZ
CenterGroup
for Citizens Initiative Porec
The representative of an organisation registered ID1699998503207 Cooperatives Europe
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency - Brod Ecological Society - BED
The representative of an organisation registered 89093924456-06 Vereinigung der sterrei
The representative of an organisation registered 15423437054-40 Verband der Chemischen
The representative of an organisation registered 226354616978-90 Vanguard Asset Manage
The representative of an organisation registered 52240973601-34 Geelmuyden Kiese
The representative of an organisation registered 416456120129-02 BSH Hausgerte GmbH
The representative of an organisation registered 49931835063-67 Access Info Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 0711626572-26 ECPA
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 11487521943-46 EUNAAPA
The representative of an organisation registered 57221111091-19 Frank Bold
The representative of an organisation registered 353804021418-79 Gide
An individual in my pers Slovenia
The representative of an organisation registered 570846710712-13 European Beer Consume
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency European Movement Ire
An individual in my pers Slovenia
The representative of an organisation registered 35890511033-58 Irish Funds Industry Ass
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Vlaamse Regering
The representative of an organisation registered 030040413042-95 Michela Cocchi - Studio
The representative of an organisation registered 65110063986-76 Association for Financi
The representative of an organisation registered 1978775156-31 IFIEC Europe - Internat
The representative of an organisation registered 61911227368-75 European Patients' For
The representative of an organisation registered 33213703459-54 Insurance Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 771938270-34 ICAEW
The representative of an organisation registered 69240395197-02 REPSOL, S.A.
The representative of an organisation registered 204118419175-08 Red Flag
The representative of an organisation registered 52646912360-95 Die Deutsche Kreditwir
The representative of an organisation registered 39300567160-02 FEDMA
The representative of an organisation registered 39300567160-02 FEDMA
Union Ptrolire Europenne Indpendante's public ID number in the
The representative of an organisation registered Transparency Register is:UPEI
42843016904-50
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 01890906437-84 LA POSTE
The representative of an organisation registered 57231475311-15 Centre Maurits Coppiete
The representative of an organisation registered 44645832794-05 Universidad de Granada
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency APECOM Associao Por
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Karlsruhe
The representative of an organisation registered 96645517357-19 ClientEarth
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Scottish Local Governme
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered FFSA (5149794935-37) Association Franaise
The representative of an organisation registered 77823123416-69 European Parliamentary
The representative of an organisation registered 3945154610-54
44361352681-84 European Anti-Poverty
The representative of an organisation registered Stichting Health Action I
The representative of an organisation registered Borsa0713948094 Borsa Italiana SpA
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency CONSEIL NATIONAUX
The representative of an organisation registered 6256831207-27 Enel SpA
The representative of an organisation registered 105398420716-74 Handwerkskammer fr
The representative of an organisation registered 520775919740-63 Civil Society Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 37561907555-47 Bayerischer Handwerkst
The representative of an organisation registered 2889227277356 Handwerkskammer Niede
The representative of an organisation registered 3183894853-03 Hill & Knowlton Internat
The representative of an organisation registered 382147211686-77 Extended Producer Respo
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Marktgemeinde Ziersdor
The representative of an organisation registered 13324391892-74 EnBW Energie Baden-W
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 16178359495-57 Vereinte Dienstleistung
The representative of an organisation registered 09245221105-30 Fdration bancaire fra
The representative of an organisation registered 39912257528-48 Confederation of Swedis
The representative of an organisation registered 58798766431-41 Deutsche Gesellschaft f
The representative of an organisation registered 43246044354-41 sterreichischer Gewer
The representative of an organisation registered 43251547769-22 European Youth Forum
The representative of an organisation registered 59513031434-92 CEEP - European Centre
The representative of an organisation registered 23020671103-67 Cambre Associates
The representative of an organisation registered 64270747023-20 DIGITALEUROPE
The representative of an organisation registered 03094871618-32 UniCredit
The representative of an organisation registered 85083981189-35 Social Platform
The representative of an organisation registered 705376917728-85 Initiative Wald mit Wild
The representative of an organisation registered 42122398878-52 CNA - Confederazione Na
The representative of an organisation registered 58969291154-50 Surfrider Foundation Eu
The representative of an organisation registered 016371114093-01 Toy Industries of Europe
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Oficina Antifrau de Cata
The representative of an organisation registered 16311905144-06 European Digital Rights
The representative of an organisation registered BNP P891636587 BNP Paribas
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Maecenata Stiftung
The representative of an organisation registered 47003483702-10 European Citizen Action
An individual in my pers Other country
The representative of an organisation registered 962426013632-68 Verband Insolvenzverwal
The representative of an organisation registered Conf154646105 Confdration des Synd
The representative of an organisation registered 94850879680-26 Finansforbundet
The representative of an organisation registered 5666358527775 ENSIE - European Networ
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency BLOOM (en fait on est in
The representative of an organisation registered 70953241037-94 SOMO - Stichting Onderz
The representative of an organisation registered 067560916517-43 Baby Milk Action
The representative of an organisation registered 6314918394-16 LobbyControl e.V.
The representative of an organisation registered 618675514930-33 Grand Orient de France
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Greens/EFA group in th
The organisation's head
*Your organisation bel Other profile a) Do you agree that e
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Luxembourg Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Estonia Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Partially agree
Spain Companies and groups non profit renewable en Fully agree
Spain Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Germany Professional consultancies Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Bulgaria Think tanks and research institutions No opinion
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Romania Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Disagree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Italy Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Czech Republic Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Disagree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Companies and groups Fully agree
Other country Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Professional consultancies Fully agree
Partially agree
France Professional consultancies Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
France Transnational associations and networks of publicFully agree
Portugal Transnational associations and networks of publicPartially agree
France Self-employed consultants Partially agree
United Kingdom Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Romania Non-governmental organisprofesional association Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Luxembourg Trade and business associations Fully agree
Austria Companies and groups Fully agree
Spain Law-firms Fully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Netherlands Think tanks and research institutions Fully agree
Spain Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Netherlands Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Italy Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Czech Republic Professional consultancies Partially agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Disagree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Law-firms Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Romania Professional consultancies Fully agree
Romania Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Disagree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Italy Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Fully agree
Romania Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Romania Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Italy Professional consultancies Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
France Companies and groups Partially agree
Fully agree
Italy Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Finland Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Italy Companies and groups Fully agree
Netherlands Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Spain Think tanks and research institutions Fully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Italy Professional consultanc innovazione sociale Fully agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Croatia Self-employed consultanNon-governmental organFully agree
Czech Republic Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Other country Trade and business associations Fully agree
Netherlands Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Companies and groups Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Austria Law-firms Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade and business associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Romania Academic institutions Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Netherlands Companies and groups Society of weighing comFully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Italy Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Netherlands Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Portugal Professional consultancies Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Academic institutions Partially agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Austria Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Other sub-national publicThere are only two level Fully agree
Austria Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
France Non-governmental organis
NGO Fully agree
Partially agree
Netherlands Professional consultancies Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Partially agree
Disagree
Netherlands Professional consultanc / Fully agree
Italy Think tanks and research institutions Partially agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Italy Self-employed consultants Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Italy Professional consultanc company in Eu project mFully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
United Kingdom Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicStadtregion Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Spain Professional consultancies Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
United Kingdom Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Italy Trade unions and professional associations Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Professional consultanc ? Fully agree
Partially agree
Other country Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Disagree
Fully agree
Netherlands Other organisations incluValidee.com Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Disagree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
No opinion
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Disagree
Fully agree
Disagree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Companies and groups Fully agree
Disagree
Spain Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Companies and groups Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Spain Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
No opinion
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicLandkreis als kommunalFully agree
Fully agree
Netherlands Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Spain Professional consultancies Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKreisverwaltung Fully agree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicandere Behrden auf suFully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicStadt Landshut Partially agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publickommunale GebietskrpeFully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national public- Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Partially agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Germany Other public or mixed entKommune im Freistaat Fully agree
Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicwww.innsbruck.gv.at Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Regional structures kommunale Gebietskrpe Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Slovak Republic Companies and groups Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Spain Other organisations including: event-organising en Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Denmark Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national public- Fully agree
Spain Companies and groups Fully agree
No opinion
Partially agree
Fully agree
No opinion
Disagree
Disagree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicffentlich-rechtliche Kr Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommune Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicStadt Krefeld Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicStadt Krefeld Fully agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
No opinion
No opinion
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale Verwaltung Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Romania Law-firms Fully agree
Partially agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Ireland Other organisations including: event-organising enPartially agree
Germany Other sub-national public- Fully agree
Partially agree
Germany Regional structures Der Regierende Brgerme Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade and business associations Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Germany Trade and business associations Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale Landes- bzwFully agree
Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Croatia Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Poland Non-governmental organis To jaki bd formularza,Disagree
Croatia Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicLandkreis Fully agree
Spain Professional consultanc www.ismaelarribas.wix. Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Netherlands Regional structures Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKreisverwaltung Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publickommunale Gebietskrpe Fully agree
Germany Regional structures Die Bezirke gehren zur Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Luxembourg Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Luxembourg Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Disagree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Slovenia Non-governmental organis Zasebni zavod - nevladnFully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Kommunale Landes- bzwFully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Companies and groups SME Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale GebietskrpFully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale Landes- bzwFully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicLandkreis Fully agree
Disagree
Cyprus Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwoFully agree
Partially agree
Portugal Professional consultancies Fully agree
Germany Regional structures Kommunale GebietskrpFully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Greece Regional structures Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Austria Other public or mixed entDer Tiroler GemeindeverFully agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publickeine Fully agree
Ireland Other public or mixed entIrish Government Depar Fully agree
Fully agree
Other country Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicGemeinde Faggen Fully agree
Romania Other sub-national public authorities Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organis NGO Fully agree
Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicGemeinden Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicMarktgemeinde Kundl Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Austria Trade unions and professional associations Disagree
Austria Other sub-national publicBrgermeister Fully agree
Germany Other public or mixed entRegion mit eigenen Ge Fully agree
Fully agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicDer N Gemeindebund istFully agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale Behrde / La Partially agree
Italy Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Spain Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Think tanks and research institutions Fully agree
Spain Other organisations including: event-organising enFully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organis not for profit associati Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Netherlands Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Netherlands Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicLandratsmter Fully agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Fully agree
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Companies and groups Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Partially agree
Romania Think tanks and research institutions Fully agree
Spain Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Other organisations including: event-organising enPartially agree
Denmark Professional consultancies Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Trade and business assoPersonenbefrderung Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organis Association pour le D Fully agree
France Professional consultancies Fully agree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Spain Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Spain Professional consultancies Fully agree
Italy Other organisations including: event-organising enFully agree
Belgium Transnational associations and networks of publicFully agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Romania Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Poland Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
France Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Think tanks and research institutions Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Poland Trade unions and profesorganizacja pracodawcFully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Professional consultancies Partially agree
Spain Companies and groups Fully agree
France Professional consultancies Fully agree
Fully agree
Other country Organisations representing churches and religio Fully agree
Ireland Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Other organisations including: event-organising en
Fully agree
Partially agree
France Think tanks and research institutions Partially agree
Italy Other organisations including: event-organising en
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Italy Academic institutions Partially agree
Fully agree
Portugal Companies and groups Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Italy Other organisations including: event-organising en
Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Sweden Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Slovak Republic Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Transnational associations and networks of publicFully agree
Sweden Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Professional consultancies Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Hungary Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Denmark Companies and groups Fully agree
Greece Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Academic institutions Partially agree
Fully agree
Finland Professional consultancies Fully agree
Sweden Companies and groups Fully agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Bulgaria Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
United Kingdom Companies and groups Partially agree
Netherlands Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Italy Academic institutions Fully agree
Czech Republic Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Disagree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
United Kingdom Regional structures No opinion
Estonia Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Greece Academic institutions Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Austria Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Poland Non-governmental organis Lokalne stowarzyszenie F dully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Professional consultancies Fully agree
Sweden Other organisations including: event-organising enFully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Other organisations including: event-organising enNo opinion
Austria Other sub-national publicGemeinde/Kommune Fully agree
Germany Other organisations including: event-organising enFully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Professional consultancies Fully agree
United Kingdom Companies and groups Fully agree
Partially agree
Romania Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Regional structures Fully agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Companies and groups MedTech industry Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Belgium Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Denmark Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Portugal Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale GebietskrpFully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale GebietskrpFully agree
Germany Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Belgium Other sub-national public authorities Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunalbehrde Fully agree
Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Austria Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Netherlands Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Netherlands Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Partially agree
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Disagree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organis Verband Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommune Fully agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade and business associations Fully agree
Netherlands Trade and business associations Fully agree
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Academic institutions Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and profesA Fully agree
Partially agree
France Regional structures Regional representation Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicKommune Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicAllfllige Landes(Verfas Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicDer
Oberbrgermeister
N Gemeindebund ist Fully
einagree
im Bundesland N verfassungsrechtlich veran
Austria Other sub-national publicAllfllige Landes(verfassungs)rechtliche
Fully agree Grundlagen.
Austria Other sub-national publicsterreichischer Stdte Fully agree
Austria Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicandere Behrden auf suFully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organis European Parliament In Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicAllfllige verfassungsre Fully agree
Belgium Transnational associations and networks of publicNo opinion
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Austria Other sub-national publicKommune Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
France Law-firms Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Slovenia Companies and groups Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organis Humanitarian Organizat Fully agree
Belgium Organisations representing churches and religio Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Netherlands Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Romania Professional consultancies Fully agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Spain Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Professional consultancies Fully agree
Belgium Organisations representing churches and religio Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Sweden Trade and business associations Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national public. Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Other public or mixed entKrperschaft des ffent Fully agree
Austria Other public or mixed entDer N Gemeindebund ist Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Partially agree
Denmark Transnational associations and networks of publicFully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
United Kingdom Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Other sub-national publicNational association of LPartially agree
United Kingdom Trade unions and profesProfessional AssociationPartially agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organis I am not sure what this Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Think tanks and research institutions Partially agree
Fully agree
Austria Non-governmental organis NGO Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Sweden Other sub-national publicNationellt organ fr all Fully agree
Slovenia Other public or mixed entdravni organ Fully agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Organisations representing churches and religio Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Transnational associations and networks of publicFully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Partially agree
Partially agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Croatia Non-governmental organis Cratian umbrella patient Fully agree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Finland Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
France Trade unions and profesmonsieur Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicauf Grund bundesverfasFully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommune Fully agree
Italy Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Croatia Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Slovenia Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Portugal Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Spain Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Luxembourg Trade and business associations Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicGemeinde Partially agree
Romania Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwoPartially agree
Fully agree
Spain Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwoFully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Latvia Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Transnational associatioDnomination en nerlanFully agree
Luxembourg Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwoFully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Portugal Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwoFully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Portugal Professional consultancies Fully agree
Italy Regional structures Assemblea legislativa Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale Landes- bzwFully agree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale GebietskrperFully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Czech Republic Regional structures - No opinion
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Czech Republic Regional structures - No opinion
France Think tanks and researchGroupe de rflexion Fully agree
Spain Companies and groups Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Austria Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
France Law-firms Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwoFully agree
Italy Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwoFully agree
Finland Trade unions and profesYksityisten palvelualojenPartially agree
France Professional consultancies Fully agree
France Professional consultancies Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Croatia Non-governmental organis NGOs Fully agree
Austria Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Companies and groups Fully agree
Other country Professional consultancies Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Czech Republic Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Law-firms Fully agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Ireland Non-governmental organis Non-governmental organFully agree
Partially agree
Ireland Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Regional structures Regionale overheid Fully agree
Italy Law-firms Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Spain Companies and groups Fully agree
Ireland Professional consultancies Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Think tanks and research institutions Fully agree
Spain Academic institutions Fully agree
Portugal Trade and business assoNA Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKrperschaft des ffent Fully agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
United Kingdom Transnational associatioThe Scottish Local GovePartially agree
Partially agree
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Netherlands Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Italy Companies and groups Fully agree
France Trade and business assoInstitution reprsentativeFully agree
Italy Companies and groups Fully agree
Germany Regional structures Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national public authorities Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Austria Other sub-national publicLandes(verfassungs)rec Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Sweden Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Austria Trade unions and professional associations Disagree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Companies and groups Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Italy Trade and business associations Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Spain Other public or mixed entPublic institution attac Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Germany Think tanks and researchThe Maecenata Foundatio Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Denmark Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Non-governmental organis Vos questions sont inco Partially agree
Netherlands Think tanks and research institutions Partially agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Other public or mixed entPolitical group in the E Fully agree
Comments or suggestions b) It (Optional)
is often said tha Comments or suggestions c) In (Optional)
your opinion, how
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac Sharing of similar value They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac contrler le passage du sThey are relatively tran
Los grupos de inters, Integrity;Equality of acc Los responsables de la tThey are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Only if there is a levell Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity openness and reliability They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are not transparent
Yes I fully agree in "lo Integrity;Equality of ac A system based on testim They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality
Lobbying is - in the first place - nothing more of access They are
than the representation of interest. Thenot transparent
right at all and organisations to r
for individuals
Auf jeden Fall: LobbyarbIntegrity;Equality of acc Transparenz (das heit They are relatively transparent
Therefore it would be worrying if the right to
Integrity;Equality of interact
access was reduced or limited in the
They arefuture, for instance
relatively by legislation targeting lo
transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Current observation of the debate on lobbying at EU Level shows that the more transparency the EU offers, the more it is push
Equality of access;Othe Lobbyisten mssen den T Ehey are not transparent at all
Harmful for adequate exchange between policy-makers and organised societal are
Equality of access They not transparent
interest are also otherat all
tendencies, sometimes
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
What may be the result one Integrity;Equality
day? Return to ofthe
access They are
1960s, where an often arrogant civilrelatively transparent
service (not only in Brussels, but also in m
Integrity "Equality of access": It They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac Pubblicit delle propost They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc Though equality of access They are relatively transparent
Very unhappy about howIntegrity;Equality
t of access They are not transparent at all
Please handle lobbying ca
Integrity;Equality of access
1. I think transparent lobbying will help build trust among the public who have Theylost
areconfidence
not transparent
in the European Union's indirect
LeHowever,
2. seul objectif
theest celu Integrity;Equality
transparency should not meanof accthat
Contrle citoyen ncessai
the negotiation-rooms They
becomeare a not transparent
Live political podium through which the a
Equality
3. The best way, I think, is to giveof access
the power to hold the government in-check Theytoare relatively
journalist transparentAnd let the public hold
organizations.
4. With Wikileaks we've seen
Integrity;Equality
what distrustofinaccess
the system can trigger. They are relatively transparent
Lobbying as such has a ne Other (please elaborate Policy-makers should beThey a are not transparent at all
Integrity Being open about Who isThey are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Lobbies of big businesseIntegrity;Equality of ac Representatives of civil They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Je suis pour plus de tra Integrity;Equality of ac Que la voix des citoyensThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
It must be a mandatory Integrity;Equality of acc Equality Max info of
andaccess hastobeen
equality Theyforwarded as atran
are relatively key criterion, but it is important to
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
For instance, in the EU's Common Fisheries Policy, an annex to 1380/2013 la
Konsultationen mit Lob Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Fully agree, as long as Integrity;Equality of ac Staff of the Institutions They regulations,
In establishing good lobbying are relativelywetran
must acknowledge that many n
LEs multinationales ne dIntegrity;Equality of ac la fainantise des dput They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac The above would not be Theyof such
area relatively
great concern,
tran if it were not for the EU's in
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Le lobbying ne peut resteIntegrity;Equality of acc L' quit dans le nombreThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of ac Mandatory registration They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Il n'y contribue pas ce Integrity;Equality of ac L'quit dans la pratiqu They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Lobbying will always be pIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
lobbying
I agree with the statement, however I have currently no hope that lobbyingThey
should be consiO ther (please elaborate the civil society should mayare
onenot
daytransparent
get "clean", i.e. transparent and ethica
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively
Does ethics mean that each time that a role-player in one field is received by the decisions maker, transparent
some representent of the o
Should lobbying still be allowed
Integrity;Equality
by the EUofinstitutions,
ac I would it is
say
a good
obligation
thing to
toNo
have
opinion
any intervention logged and accessible to any
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Other (please elaborate es muss vermieden werde They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Pas d'galit des armes Integrity;Other (please La premire commissionThey d are not transparent
Pas d'galit des armes Integrity;Other (please La premire commissionThey d are not transparent
Seul le peuple souverainIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Other (please elaborate No es lo mismo quien defThey are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Equality of access companies and NGOs mu They are relatively transparent
Other (please elaborate They are not transparent at all
Lobbyists are experts onIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Les intrts des citoyen Integrity Nous avons trop souventThey are relatively transparent
The question by itself i Integrity;Equality of ac Public institutions need They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Full transparency in any They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access;Othe I think that also reason They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Le politiche vanno discusOther (please elaborate Che ogni istanza presenta They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively tran
Your question is ambiguoIntegrity;Other (please Strong regulations contr They are not transparent at all
La FNMF est trs en faveu Integrity;Equality of acc Il est certain que nos a They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access Integrity is always importThey are relatively transparent
L'thique et la transpar Other (please elaborate L'argent qu'il est autori They are not transparent at all
A la ciudadana no nos l Integrity Como grupos de inters,They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Equality of access En fonction des thmatiqThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Lobbying is an essential Integrity;Equality of ac It is important that lobb They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access;Othe Que tenga otros reconocThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access;Othe the process must be open They are not transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
The EU Lobby transparen Integrity;Equality of ac Operating process to all They are highly transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively
Si les institutions de l'UE sont bien transparentes, il conviendrait qu'elles contraignent le lobbytransparent
arien l'tre tout autant.
Integrity;Equality of ac vocational motivation They are relatively transparent
Ce n'est pas le cas. Integrity;Equality of acc La rpression effective They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity Zuverlssigkeit They are highly transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are relatively transparent
O lbi tem de ser rigor Integrity;Equality of acc O acesso actividade d They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
pour le moment le lobby Equality of access;Othe LES LOBBYSTES DOIVE They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity
Alors que rien ne l'y autorise dans le TFUE, le lobbying est devenu institutionnelThey are relatively
dans transparent
l'UE avec des associations d'entreprise
Ces associations prennes Equality
pour la
of dure
accessd'application
L'obligation
both des dcisions
sides ofdethe
comptes
prises
They
discussionn'ont
areaucune
have notlearn
to transparent
lgitimit et les
and accept contacts
that qu'elles
the better peu
informed
also the Commission, theIntegrity;Equality of ac Nt the size of a lobbying They groupare
is important,
not transparent
only the
at all
qualification to contribut
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Other (please elaborate Un systme de complianc They are relatively transparent
Wichtig ist hier vor al Integrity;Equality of acc Der Einfluss der Lobbys They are relatively tran
No opinion They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
PURCHE' SIA DATA LA Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access
It is important to understandTheywhich
are highly
inputstransparent
from consultation and lobby groups
Equality of access;Othe They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
les thmes traits sont Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
seuls les citoyens doivenOther (please elaborate Vous ne devez pas avoirThey are not transparent at all
La rponse serait oui pe Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Every time that we have Integrity;Equality of acc see above They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
also as a former eu civi Integrity They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac small NGOs do not haveThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of ac Transparenz und demokrThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Il serait intressant de Equality of access;Othe Il faudrait que les lobb They are not transparent
Im Prinzip stimme ich deIntegrity;Equality of acc Nicht nur mehr TranspareThey are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access;Othe real effectivness of the They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac public hand support for They are relatively transparent
This question is oriented.Equality of access;Othe All minute of meetings inThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
The whole chain has to bIntegrity;Equality of ac transparency sees on theThey are relatively tran
The Commissionair Should Other (please elaborate Access for citizens, not They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
transparente LobbyarbeitIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
creare momenti di discu Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
It is the first tool agai Equality of access It used to say that even They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc objectivity, openness They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
No opinion They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access;Othe Concertation et co-constrThey are relatively transparent
Integrity At present, it feels like They are relatively transparent
Totalmente de acuerdo siIntegrity;Equality of ac Responder a intereses cThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity
Full disclosure is a given, as the monies to fund the
If there
EU come
is no from
integrity, They
the taxes
there of
canare
berelatively
each no
country.
reasontransparent
There
to trust
must
what
beindividuals
open scrutiny
are oth
do
Any payments made by lobbyIntegrity
groups or other interested
As othersparties
followmust
whatbe has
made
They
gone are
public,
before.
not as
transparent
well as any paid travel by official EU
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Il est important d'avoir Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Un lobbying thique et trIntegrity;Equality of ac La publicit. Il est imp They are relatively tran
Integrity They are highly transparent
Equality of access Kohrente Regelungen, They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac L'quit entre les diff They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of ac independent control of f They are not transparent
Integrity - Regelmiger Austaus They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Ease of access for peoplThey are relatively tran
Overordnet er det godt aIntegrity;Equality of ac Registret br vr oblig They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of acc Equality of access must They are not transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Les lobbyistes occupent Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Public disenchantment wiOther (please elaborate it is mostly about the qu They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
how do you define ethic Integrity;Equality of ac a better representation They are relatively tran
Les dcideurs politiques Integrity;Equality of acc Il faut liminer les risq They are relatively tran
La presence d'une majoriIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of ac Lobbyists and the represThey are not transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Gegenseitiger Respekt, IThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac Equality of access for b They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity They are highly transparent
I don't think it is at al Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Demasiada burocracia coIntegrity They are not transparent at all
Un control totalmente tr Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Sharing the special inte Integrity;Equality of acc All of the above demand They are relatively tran
Ethical and Transparent Il ntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
The terms "ethical" and Integrity;Equality of ac Only official and publicl They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
The EU transparency regis Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access;Othe Un encadrement stricte They are relatively transparent
It depends whom is lobbyIntegrity;Equality of ac Political bias They are not transparent
Je suis en faveur d'une Integrity;Equality of ac Clair encadrement du Lob They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac l'thique They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Le lobbying est une for Other (please elaborate L'Europe doit tre l' They are not transparent
Ethical and transparent Integrity;Equality of acc Absence of mandatory app They are not transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Legitimidad They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality
If delegates need lobby inputs because theyof access
are not capable to represent They are then
citizens, relatively transparent system doesn't work
the representatve
This might be done like this
Equality
consultation,
of accesswith a general
Transparency
and specific
goes part.
of coThey
I still would
are relatively
lease the
tran
final decision to each delegate
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc Selon impact du dossier They are relatively transparent
Le lobbying, mme transp Other (please elaborate Qu'ils [les groupes de p They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
I see lobbying generally Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Lobbying should be regulEquality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
ordinary citizens do not Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Full transparency is nec Integrity;Equality of acc Sincerity. Clarity. They are not transparent at all
Actividades de lobi sao Other (please elaborate Sou completamente contr They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access The Commission must publ They are not transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
A State is the incarnati Other (please elaborate Equality is a joke due t They are not transparent
Mesure qui me semblent indispensables pour assurer la transparence des re
Equality of access - Inscription obligatorie deThey
tousare
lesrelatively transparent
reprsentants d'interets privs dans ce reg
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
- cration d'un second registre consultable sur internet par chaque citoyen lis
Integrity;Equality of ac On a Board, apour
- Interdiction member mus
They
tout lu, are relatively
membre transparent
de la commision, ou fonctionnaire europp
Le registre actuel n'as Integrity;Equality of ac - Control exhaustif des revenusThey aredes notlus
transparent
et fonctionnaires
at all pendant leurs man
Le lobbiyng est du lobbying
Integrity;Equality of acc Par intgrit, j'entends They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
I think that lobbying in Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Die EU muss zwischen de Integrity;Equality of acc Politik muss wissen, we They are relatively transparent
Certain "bad lobbyists" l Integrity They are relatively transparent
Ethical rules should be Integrity;Equality of ac There should be an obligThey are not transparent
Transparency is vital for Integrity;Equality of acc these characteristics go They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
La transparence du lobbyIntegrity;Other (please un procd permettant dThey are relatively transparent
Other (please elaborate Najpodstatnejie je poznThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access Permettre aux lobby dispThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of ac When lobbying a committThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Il lobbismo etico e trasp Integrity;Equality of ac non tener conto solo dellThey are not transparent
Whilst transparency and integrity are important and certainly needed, the long
Non dmocratique Integrity;Equality of ac Le bien commun et non lThey are not transparent at all
Le lobbying, par dfiniti Other (please elaborate Il n'y a should
There pas dealso
solution They are
be a review not transparent
of existing rules and regulations to see whethe
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Other (please I also believe that one ofThey the principles
are not transparent
should be value for money in all ways
Integrity;Equality of ac Openess of the objectiveThey are not transparent at all
Integrity Objectivity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac non Profit Organisation They are relatively transparent
it makes it more profess Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
To an extent but ONLY ifIntegrity;Equality of ac Total honesty by the lob They are not transparent
"Ethical and transparent Other (please elaborate How about not having priv They are not transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
ALLOW LOBBYING ONLY Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac SME / SE inclusion They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Transparent governanceThey are not transparent at all
Only if tightly regulated Integrity;Equality of acc The biggest challenge isThey are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
lobbying is a serious br Other (please elaborate Europeans are not AmeriThey are not transparent
It would be better if th Integrity Integrity as integrity of They are relatively transparent
Would fully agree if only Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
I agree that it should be Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Ethical & transparant lo Other (please elaborate Equality and integrity do They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
It is a matter of definit Integrity;Equality of acc All representations shou They are not transparent
The amount of money one Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Not sure if there is a c Integrity Recognition of the voic They are relatively transparent
petitions are a better Other (please elaborate if at all it should be pub They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Agreements being madeThey are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Es fllt schwer, Lobbyis Integrity;Equality of acc Die positive Bercksicht They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Lobbying should not inclIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Define "ethical". Under No opinion They are not transparent at all
This question is way top Integrity;Equality of ac No linkage to personal be They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Only if said lobby has a Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
I agree that it helps pol Integrity;Equality of ac Transparency also helpsThey are relatively tran
Publication of the list o Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Everybody except the peo Integrity;Equality of ac Serious laws and boundsThey are not transparent
lobbying isnt bad in and Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Lobbying makes policy Integrity;Equality of ac Indepence of MEPs fromThey are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Lobbying helps provide aIntegrity;Equality of acmostly
platform from which The businesses
identification
Independent, of con
in-depth
can They
express
and are opinions
logical
their relatively transparent
reviewingandof the
views
content
on many
and merit
issuesofand
facts
po
Due to this one can argueIntegrity;Equality
that transparantoflobbying
ac can help policy development.
They are Itrelatively
is when tran
lobbying certain issues becomes
This is a begging the queOther (please elaborate Democratic governance sh No opinion
There is no ethical lobyi Equality of access It's the main problem. "GThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
It seems to me that in t Equality of access First I would shortly li They are not transparent
Policys should be develoIntegrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Policy should only be in Integrity;Equality of acc Lobbying groups have anThey u are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Enkel de groepen die ges No opinion No opinion
Technically, "Fully agree" would be the correct answer "Equality of access" includes financial equality of access - the money an orga
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Lobbying can help to bri Integrity;Other (please
But I had to downgrade, since you failed to ask the Citizens
This
(more should
means be
important) offer Theyactivity
that all lobbying
question: are notshould
transparent
requireatlittle
all monetary investment
as long as no money is i Equality of access They are not transparent at all
"Can sufficient ethics andIntegrity;Equality
transparency standards
of acc Inbeaddition,
established
the effectiveness
so that the
Theybenefits
gap
are between
relatively
of sensible
in-person
tran lobbying
lobbying
exceedby the
people
costinofBr
u
I think ethical lobbying i Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Possibly, because the spe Equality of access No opinion
Unternehmen knnen sich Integrity;Equality of ac keine Involvierung von They are not transparent
Integrity No opinion
Integrity;Other (please a complete register of l They are relatively transparent
EU policies should first Integrity They are not transparent at all
I am not very versed in t Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Other (please elaborate Lobbying is state sancti They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Lobbyists work like lawyers. They more money you Thehave,
integrity
the more
of lobbying
/ bettercan
lobbyists
alwaysyou understood
can afford.through
This means
transparency.
the average c
It's a legal bribe. Other (please elaborate No money / gain should They are relatively tran
I believe lobbying can beEquality
used forofgood,
accessbut like every
The more
system,
important fact They
it's currently thatare
is abused relatively
citizens havetransparent
for power by
barely
moreany powerful
knowledge
agents,
of who
and loth
Nothing like transparent Integrity;Equality of ac Decisions must be madeThey w are not transparent
I suggest more regulations, Integrity;Equality
more rules and ofmore
acc Iequal
believe
opportunities
lobbying should
for lobbying
They
be brought
areonrelatively
the
to behalf
the public,
tran
of citizens'
and openedinterests.
up even furthe
Integrity;Equality of ac Entgeltlosigkeit (entsch They are relatively transparent
Yes, ethical conduct andIntegrity;Equality of ac There needs to be a cleaThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Unless the issue is scie Other (please elaborate This survey is so obviou They are not transparent
Integrity I do not believe that equ They are relatively tran
Businesses hold more swa Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively tran
Depends and what is mea Integrity;Equality of ac Lobbying should only takThey are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of acc Ik kan er niks aan doen, They are not transparent
No opinion They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac No corporate agenda gea No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
I am concerned that wherNo opinion I do not understand the They are relatively tran
While I think that ehica Integrity Transparency is the keyst They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access Las consultas que hacenThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc Transparenz im Hinblick They are relatively transparent
Other (please elaborate Publicly available audio They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Lobbying needs to be balIntegrity;Equality of acc Lobbying is only one impo They are relatively transparent
No opinion They are not transparent at all
I believe lobbying allow No opinion They are relatively transparent
I am a member of DiEM25 Integrity;Equality of ac There should be regulatiThey are not transparent
Ethical in the sense of " Integrity;Other (please Again it must be made clThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Le contrle des lus, desThey are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Lobbying helps businesse Integrity;Equality of ac To fully understand the They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
in an ideal world, it migh Integrity;Equality of ac How come companies can They(u are not transparent at all
Yes, under the condition Integrity;Equality of ac To prevent even a hint o They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access
'Lobbying' represents a wide range of activities. While it certainly helps policy Theydevelopment,
are not transparent at all needs to be raised, e
the question
Concordo, desde que o gIntegrity;Equality of ac The No financial
existncia de confli
means Theyorganisations.
of lobby are relatively tranIt is clear that for-profit lobbies ca
It is not as much the activity
Integrity;Equality
of lobbying itself
of ac
thatThis
needsbegs
to be
theregulated
question (though
upThey
to what
are
thisnot
point
is transparent
obviously
this financial
very mportant),
inequality isbut
allowed
these dis
to d
I object to this question Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
It can certainly help pol Integrity No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
S'il est effectivement bi Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
The problem
Lobbying hasisnothat lobbying
place inOthercan seriously
(please lacks regulation,
elaborate Complete ban and of
frequently
lobbying Tend up as
hey are notdisguised
transparent corruption and/or manipulation
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
It might also be usefull toEquality
be able of
to access
point out easily which politicians haveThey closeare
relations with whichatlobbies,
not transparent all and highlight it d
Needs to be very transpaIntegrity;Equality of access They are highly transpar
The second point of the problem is that it's less lobbyism in itself that is an issue rather than the fact that a lot of them are lobb
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Equality of access
A good example would be watching how Apple lobbied Transparency
against tax
andpolicy No opinion
identification
and crackdowns
of lobbieson andfraud,
theirbecause
targettedtheir
politicians
interests
seem
we
All parties affected by a Integrity;Equality of ac Citizen's opinions on theThey are not transparent
While they should be allowed Integrity;Equality
to make theirofcase,
ac Putting
it should
forms
be inon
public
how in
lobbyism
such
Theycases
are
should
relatively
and/or
happenrecorded
tranmight properly
also help;
(orfor
atexample
least theib
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Definition von "ethisch Integrity;Other (please Kontrollmglichkeiten They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access;Other (please elabo They are relatively transparent
Equality of access;Othe Falls nicht vorgesehen: They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Corporate and "for-profitIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of acc There is too much of a teThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity They are relatively tran
Pour le domaine financieIntegrity;Equality of acc La logique de "l'intrt They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Decisionmaking without Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access;Othe El de representar el inte They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of ac Access to everything : f They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
I do not know if EU takesIntegrity;Equality of ac Although people can expr They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
This makes only the politIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
It is important you hear it from my point of view and
It isthat
important
is of a Peruvian
you hear Citizen
it from my
whopoint
lovesofhis
viewcountry
and that
deeply
is of and
a Peruvian
is extremely
Citiz

I am no magician nor a fortune teller but I can already


I am no
tell magician
that your nor
findings
a fortune
on this
teller
process
but I can
will come
already
totell
showthatthat
your
the
findings
process
o

I can already tell by the articles the JNE are putting


I can
outalready
but the tell
mostbygrieving
the articles
feeling
the is
JNEthatare
this
putting
will come
out but
to light
the most
too late
grieving
and w

BUT I will talk on behalf of the people who are showing BUT I will theirtalk
outrage
on behalf
due of to the
this people
decision. whoThearefactshowing
is that their
throughout
outragethisdueLEGA
to th
Other (please elaborate Anti-corruption - transpa They are relatively tran
And that is the very thingIntegrity;Equality
is in question NOW of acandAnd
I Ithink
think
that
ayouis the
should
watchdog verykeepiThey
take
thingunder
is in are
question
great consideration
NOW
relatively and Ithe
transparent think
following:
you should take und
WHY did they (JNE) act the way they did, of
Integrity;Equality I am sure
accessWHY thedid actions
they (JNE)
that put actTODOS
the
They way
arePOR
they EL
did,PERU
relatively I am sure
out the
transparent of campaign
actions thatwereputlong
TOD b
WHY
I fully did it happen
support at that
the noti specific moment,
Integrity;Equality of please
ac WHY takedid
Maintaining a look
it happen
a at theat polls
reasonable that historical
Theyspecific moment,
are not data for the
please
transparent last take
90 days
a lookandatyoull
the polls
see thhi
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Please also focus on the WHO, who actually shared Pleaselightalso
on thefocus
error
onmadethe WHO, by the
whopolitical
actually
party
shared
whichlight
greatly
on the
benefit
errorthe
made
otheb
There exists positive lob Integrity;Equality of ac Checking the organisation They are relatively tran
Es
Butwre
mostschn, wennplease
Importantly di Integrity;Equality of accthis
question the WHY Es sollten
ButJNE most maximal
official
Importantly
did not2 TreThey
please
show more are leniency
not transparent
question the WHY
towards this the
JNEdemocratic
official didprocess
not show by
And that for some reasonIntegrity;Equality
the JNE judgments of access
is more
And that forgiven
for some
and Ireason
am sure They arewill
theshe
JNE relatively
be allowtransparent
judgments toiscontinue.
more forgiven and I am sure
I pray you can read this message
Integrity;Equality
and canofnotice
acc Ihow prayfor youmecan andread
thosethiswho
message
They I share
are and
highly
the can
same
transpar
notice
concernhow there
for meis and
clearly
thosea case
who f
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;Other (please Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Transparency is indeed important. But it is not so much about 'shedding light
Integrity Les citoyens ne sont pasThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access Furthermore, there a lot more They reasons
are relatively tran
for lobbying regulations. An important
The EU parliament as well Integrity;Equality
as the national of access (which indirectly fillThey
parliaments are relatively
the important tran in the EU institutions) are ele
positions
Having said that, it is clearIntegrity;Other
that unethical(please
(what everThey that canis also
supposed
directly to reduce
mean
Theyprecisely)
the
are amount
not transparent
andofintransparent
corruption in the lobbying
institutions.
is a lotE.g
wo
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Lobbying ist meines EracEquality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access - Enforcement of compliance They(both
are relatively
on the sidetransparent
of lobbyists as well as on the s
Integrity;Equality of ac Voorkomen dat commercil No opinion
- Accountability (of the EU institutions by publishing the influence of interest r
Integrity;Equality of ac dokadne
- Full disclosureinformacje, cz They are
(of information onrelatively transparent
representatives as well as meetings etc. o
Ethical and transparent Integrity;Equality of ac - Mandatory register They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Was ist untadelig? Wer Equality of access They are relatively transparent
This question is way too Integrity;Equality of acc protection of whistleblo They are not transparent at all
Meiner Meinung nach kn Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of acc Participants should rece They are relatively transparent
If all lobbying were eth Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Pienamente d'accordo nella Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are not transparent
Yes it can help policy de Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Not sure how ethical "et Integrity;Equality of ac Policy makers (as they aThey are not transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Lobbying id emulating thIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Lobbying is corruption Other (please elaborate Lobbyists should not be They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Other (please elaborate Openbaar maken van deThey i are not transparent
Integrity They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Decisions must be takenIntegrity;Equality
after consultationofprocedure
access with all interested parts.
They are relatively transparent
Lobbying is part of consultation procedure.
We cannot rely on ethicalIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Consultation is conducted through Transparency Registry (TR) in two levels: a) by accredited entities who can express opinion
Integrity
Any 'Lobbying' procedure is compulsory to be held within TR frame. They are relatively tran
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;No opinion Eine transparente
All opinions are expressed in written or oral (videoPublicity VerwaThey are relatively
recordings) and follow text limits and time tran
recordings rules provided by TR,
Integrity;Equality of access
All formal and informal institutions involved with the
All decision
participants
making They
(policy-makers,are
process must relatively
lobbyists,
take under transparent
etc) consideration
must give in public
opinions
their
expresse
positio
Any decision taken MUST Integrity;Equality
be subjected toof confirmation
ac Any discussion,
by the European
conversation,
Parliament.
They are
etc relatively
taking place
tranbetween interested parts and
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Lobbying allows policy Equality of access They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively tran
It should be completely tIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
I agree that transparencyIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;Other (please Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
"Ethisch untadelig" kan Integrity Gewhlte Politiker sollt They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They
die Politik sollte sich darauf are relatively
besinnen, transparent
fr das Gemeinwohl der individuellen B
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Other (please elaborate They are not transparent at all
Policy makers are faced Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Transparenz in der Lobby Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Equality
Both are relative terms doesn't of access
says about what people actually do. They are relatively transparent
Other (please elaborate "Power tends to corrupt They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Der einzelne Brger soll Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Currently there are too mIntegrity;Equality of ac full disclosure of docu They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Citizens, however, do noIntegrity;Equality of ac Democratic legitimacy (toThey are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
. Integrity;Equality of acc Policy development depend They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
There should be no lobbyi Other (please elaborate Institutions of the EU sh They are not transparent at all
We need to remember that Integrity;Equality of ac It is about engagement -They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
It depends on the ethics Integrity;Equality of ac Please see previous co They are not transparent
Qui dcide qu'un lobby eIntegrity They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac 1. Timeliness of consul They are relatively tran
The transparency registeIntegrity;Equality of ac Comprehensiveness: It isThey are relatively tran
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Politicians should stop l Integrity;Equality of ac Standing on the side of They are not transparent
Transperency is a must iIntegrity;Equality of ac Interest representitives No opinion
Es besteht aber ein UnteIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Die sterreichischen Ge Integrity Transparenz der VerwaltThey are relatively tran
Best if you left policy Other (please elaborate The most important princiThey are not transparent
Transparenz in der Lobby Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity La publicit des documents They are relatively
servant transparent
l'argumentaire de chacun (ou les rfren
A condition que cela s'a Integrity;Equality of ac They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Policy makers should takNo opinion They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity Less than lobbying, moreThey listensaretorelatively
citizens transparent
and independent expert.
Il lobbying pu contribui Equality of access;Othe Limit Ferrea regolamentazione
conflicts of interest,They at possibly,
and are relativelyfocustransparent
on people without conflicts of in
Integrity;Equality of ac Example: Miguel ARIAS They CAETE are not
hastransparent
ties to fossilatfuels,
all it should not be dire
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access I think access by lobyistsThey should arebe relatively
very limited.transparent
Maybe max one hour a day
A parte il fatto che sare Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
I think it helps, but I Integrity;Equality of ac Also I think that with preventing They are badnotlobbying/
transparent bias there is a neccesity that co
Integrity They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;Other (please Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac No basta con el principi They are highly transpar
i hate the eu , will soon No opinion as above , dont want it , They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
In general, ethical and transparent
No opinionlobbying helpsTo policy
achieve
development
a sound framework
andThey
it is important
for relatively
are relations
to makewith sure
lobbyists,
transparent that the
theprocesses
following wouldto se
la socit civile n'est Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Transparent lobbying is about more than just the Stopping EU's lobby the
transparency
privileged access
register. byThe
business
Commission
interests:should
Lobbyists
extendrepresenting
the wider t
Was ist denn unter "ethi Integrity;Equality of ac To achieveAn
Kontrolle! a sound framework
GesprcheNo for relations with lobbyists, the following would
opinion
Das Transparenzregister
Meanwhile, the European Integrity;Equality
hat auch und vor
Ombudsman ofallem
has access
den
Eine
seriously Zweck,
transparente
Stopping
criticisedEinflsse
lobbying vonThey
Verwaltung
the Commission
on behalf ofare
for not
Einzelpersonen,
setzt
'toxic' transparent
itsvoraus,
poor
industries: atethical
Unternehmen
dassAn die all
implementationvon ihr
und
of getroffenen
Organisationen
approach
the World Ents
to Health
lobby
Zur Erluterung: Die Europische
Integrity;Equality
Kommission Stopping
of accwei um und thebetont
privileged access
seit einigen
They are by relatively
Jahrenbusiness interests: der
die Bedeutung
transparent Lobbyists representing
Zusammenarbeit m
In general,it ethical
shouldand transparent lobbying helps policy development is and it isinstitutions:
important
ethical.to make sure that the processes to se
However, be pointed
Other out
(please
that lobbying
elaborate which
Ethicsis rules
transparent
for those not
in the
No
always
opinion ItLobbyists
is not justmay
about
make
rules
fullfordisclosures
lobbyists,
Stopping lobbying on behalf of 'toxic' industries: An ethical approach to lobby
Transparent lobbying is aboutIntegrity;Equality
more than justof access
the EU's lobby transparencyThey register.are The
relatively transparent
Commission should extend the wider t
Integrity;Equality of access Ethics rules for those in the They are relatively
institutions: It is transparent
not just about rules for lobbyists,
Eine Transparenz
However, it shouldinbeder Integrity
pointed out that lobbying which is transparent is notThey always areethical.
relatively tran may make full disclosures
Lobbyists
Other (please elaborate No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Transparency is not the Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Transparenz in der LobbIntegrity They are relatively transparent
Transparenz in der LobbIntegrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Any kind of lobbying by sIntegrity They are not transparent
Decision making processe Integrity;Equality of ac Publication of lobbying bThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
I take 'lobbying' to mea Integrity;Equality of ac It seems that access to They are relatively transparent
Trust in EU institutions isIntegrity;Equality
essential for the ofmaintenance
access and protection of European unity. In my
They are relatively experience of teaching studen
transparent
No opinion They are relatively transparent
Transparency of lobbyingNo activities
opinionis crucial to help stem the tide of scepticism. They are In Ireland,
relatively the Regulation of Lobbying Act, 201
transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
The Freedom of Information Act, 2014, and subsequent guidelines to Public Service Bodies, set out greater openness and tran
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;Other (please Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
The EU should continually Integrity
show Member States that verytransparency
hard to achieve (intbest
is the Theyoption
are relatively
in the 21sttrancentury, and it should lead the
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Transparency can help policy Integrity
development by focusingLobbying bureaucratic
regulations bodies
areTheyon the
are needrelatively
for ethically,
tran environmentally, and soc
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transpar
ALTER-EU
Die deutsche considers
Wirtschaftthat, in general, ethical
Integrity;Other (pleaseandDietransparent
Regulierung lobbying
der Inthelps
Theypolicy development
are relatively tran and it is important to make su
All meetings with lobby Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
A more pertinent
lobying question would perhaps
accessbe:von
what is ethical and transparent lobbying? This consultation focuses on the lobby
Oberstezoals het sollte
Prioritt nu geesEquality
sein, die ofEinflsse Organisationen
The first question und They
Personen,
above referred
aredie not transparent
toEinzelinteressen
ethical lobbying which goes further than t
vertreten zu regulieren Integrity;Equality
bzw. offenzulegen. of access wird allgemein als unrechtmige
Lobbying They are relatively transparent
Einflussnahme auf das Gesetzgebungs
The Commission's November 2014 transparency Stopping
reforms whichthe privileged
prevent commissioners
access by business and senior
interests:officials
Lobbyists
from meeting
representing
with
Integrity;No
"Ethical" is inherently subjective. Same opinion Eine transparente
applies toIntegrity:
"transparent".
applies VerwaThey
trhoughout theare relatively
entire life tran
of an individual/organisation
Prioritising the public interest: Public and private (business) interests can and conth
Therefore this statement Integrity;Other
is biased and technically
(please
We also note that the European Ombudsman hasPreventing Other:
written reasons
to encourage
seriously criticisedfor lobbying
unscrupulous a positive
Theyshould
the Commission are answer,
not
be
lobbying: Lobbying transparent
clearly
in a
for its poorclearly
indicated
in the manipulative
to prevent
implementation
context of a conflictway
"covert"
of the World op
of inte
Die Senatskanzlei wrdi Integrity Severely restricting lobbying Theyon are relatively
behalf transparent
of 'toxic' industries: An ethical approac
Transparency is only oneOther element,
(please
albeit
elaborate
an essential
All lobby
one,transparency
of ethical lobbying.
rules
No opinion
must
But ethical
be placed lobbying
in thisgoes
wider,farethical
beyond context.
transparen
Kaikenlainen salailu on Equality of access They are not transparent
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Wichtig ist u. a. die Sicherstellung, dass nicht lediglich Partikularinteressen d
Lobbying does not help p
Integrity;Equality of
Es sollte eine Selbstverstndlichkeit sein, dass sich ac What would help policy anThey
d are not transparent
TheInteressenvertreter
die besonders
integrity ofviele die geltenden
both finanzielle
lobbyists Ressourcen
and Gesetze
policy-makersfr dieis und Regeln to halten,
Interessenvertretung
essential so wie
aufbr
the effective so
Integrity und wichtig, wenn
Transparenz ist dann zielfhrend Zustzlich sollte Bercksichtigung relatively
Gleichberechtigten
sie dazu fhrt, dass
Zugang They
ein are
Mitglied
verstehen deswir
finden, transparent
Europischen
als
dass Mglichkeit Parlamentes
ffentliche fr jede Person
Behrden oder
der der
und
Mitg
Seine
SoundGrenzen liegen allerdings
policy development Equality darin,
requiresof access
woand
data zu evidence
viel Unter
Transparenz
Sound gleichberechtigtem
regionaler
and undIntransparenz
lokaler
policymaking
often They
Ebene
the industry
requiresZugang
erzeugt.
areisfull
sowie
that
the relatively
verstehen
Aus
ihre
most
range diesem
tran
wir
Gremien,
directly
of auerdem
viewsGrund
and sollteauch
Zusammenschlsse
impacted das
positions
will be dieTranspare
the
to Freiheit
be und
best
heardVb
(pe
Entgegen der in den MedIntegrity;Equality of ac Teil der Multi-Level-Governance They areinrelatively
der Europischen
tran Union und dem Gemein
Where trade-offs between Equality
competingof access
public policyButobjectives
achieving have
equality They
to beofmadeaccessitare not
isalso transparent
atrequires at all
EU levelrecognition
the shared of responsibility
the disparitiesofth
Integrity;Equality of acc They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Les lobby font leur trava Integrity;Equality of acc il est trange qu'il ex They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc Il suffit qu'un lobby so They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
No opinion Przede wszystkim wtpliw No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
I worry that lobbyists representing powerful organisations or wealthy individualsare
Integrity;Equality of ac Corporate interest groupThey have relatively
much moretransparent
opportunity to influence polic
It is not clear to me how Integrity;Equality
deep some lobbyist of ac
are involved
There needs in policy
to bemaking.
a mech They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
le lobbying peut-il tre Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Die (in)offiziellen Lob Other (please elaborate Ein technokratisch-reprThey are not transparent
gli interessi specifici d Integrity I responsabili politici, They are not transparent
Jedoch ist eine einseiti Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Dal mio punto di vista Other (please elaborate Inserire tetti di stipendi They are not transparent at all
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;Other (please Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Other (please Responsibility with compThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Lobbying darf nicht von Other (please elaborate Da sich Konzerne, im b They are not transparent
Was genau ist ethisch? DIntegrity;Equality of ac Verffentlichung von Ha They are not transparent
The adjective ethical is Integrity;Equality of ac Integrity is impossible t They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Are lobbyists registered Integrity;Other (please Full disclosure of the i They are relatively transparent
ethical is a loaded term iIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc Lobbying for essential s They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Il convient de distinguer Integrity They are relatively transparent
ethical and transparent Integrity;Equality of ac registration of the infor They are relatively tran
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;Other (please Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Die Transparenz in der LNo opinion They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access;Othe Las reuniones con grande They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
All EU decision-makers sOther (please elaborate Meetings with big busineNo opinion
Alles muss transparent sEquality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are not transparent at all
We need politics to be o Integrity;Equality of acc What is good for profit i They are not transparent at all
o dleitch veciach b Other (please elaborate transparentnos a intitThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
We, the citizens of Euro Integrity;Equality of ac The basic principle is t They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Business is not a priori Integrity;Equality of acc Information in understanNo opinion
Other (please elaborate strengere Regeln fr bei No opinion
Every EU citizen should Other (please elaborate Meetings with big busines No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
There should be no secre Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
I also think non-transpar Integrity;Equality of acc code of conduct like se They are not transparent
1. In general this is true, Equality of accessin lobbying is more than just theThey
but transparency lobbyare not transparent at all
register.
2. All EU decision-makers Integrity;Equality
must be bannedoffrom access
meeting
1.Meetingswithwith
unregistered They
big business are relatively
lobbyists
lobbies andmustmust transparent
be be
limited
obligedin number
to publishandon-line
betterlist
ba
3. Meetings with big business No opinion
lobbies must be limited
2. Tougher
in number
rules
andmustbetter
notThey
balanced
onlyareapply
notthrough
to
transparent
lobbyists
interactions
but alsowith
theother
institutions.
stakehold
Str
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Ethical and transparent lobbying helps policy
Integrity;Equality of development;
To achievethus
access a sound
it is important
framework tofor
make
Theyregister.
are relations
sure that
relatively withthe
lobbyists,
processes
transparent the following
to securewould
ethic
In general this is true, but transparency in lobbying is more than just the lobby
"Contribuerait",
All s'il tait should
EU decision-makers Integrity;Equality
be bannedoffromac meeting
Des contrles drastique They
with unregistered are not
lobbyists andtransparent
should be obliged to publish online lis
However, transparent lobbying Equality is of
about more thanStopping
access just the EU's
the privileged
lobby transparency
accessare by business
register. Theinterests:
CommissionLobbyists
must representin
extend the
Meetings with big business lobbies should be limited
Meetings
in number
with big betterThey
andbusiness lobbiesnot
balanced withtransparent
should interactions
be limitedat with
all
in number
other stakeholders
and better bai
This is our democracy and Other
NOT(please
a corporacy.
elaborate Tougher rules should notNo onlyopinion
apply for lobbyists but also the institutions. Stri
The European Ombudsman has seriously criticised Yetthe
theCommission
Commissionfor has
itscommitted
poor implementation
to deliverof balance
the WorldinHealth
stakeholder
Organisat
repr
It also helps improve th Integrity;Equality of acc It's also about tackling They are not transparent
The fact to
It needs that
beso much o
pointed outIntegrity;Equality of access
that lobbying which happens
Stoppingto be
lobbying
transparent They
on behalf are
isofnot notindustries:
'toxic' transparent
necessarily alsoAnethical.
ethical Lobbyists
approach may to lobby
mak
The existence of every mEquality of access;Othe Tougher rules should notNo opinion
Lobbying is not necessarily Otherethically
(pleaseneutral.
elaborate Ethics rules for those in the No institutions:
opinion It is not just about rules for lobbyists,
The EU is supposed to reOther (please elaborate Lobbying by businesses They sh are not transparent
I am disgusted by EU polOther (please elaborate I consider the receiving They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Decision makers MUST be Other (please elaborate As mentioned above, meet They are not transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Bei Bedarf
Full ethical sollte die Po Integrity;Equality
and transparent of ac
lobyying requires Kompetenz,
not Meetingswith Toleranz,
only that lobbyists GaThey
should
big business be are notshould
registered
lobbies transparent
but also at
be that all
EU decision
limited makers and
in number are
Other (please elaborate interactions
Meetings withwith big busines
other They are relatively
stakeholders tran civil society organization
including
Integrity;Equality of ac public interest. The most They areeffectiveand
relatively tran ethical way to stop privilege
EU-EntscheidungstrgerIntegrity;Equality
s of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
In general this is true, butIntegrity;Other
transparency (please
in lobbying is more than just the lobby
mehr Transparenz Theyregister.
are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting accessMeetingswith withunregistered
big business They are relatively
lobbyists
lobbies and
should tran
should
be limited
be obliged
in number
to publish
and better
online ba
lis
the problem is that toda Integrity again, i stongly doubt th They are not transparent
Meetings with big business
Yes but transparency Integrity;Equality
lobbies
in lobbying is should ofbeaccess
more than limited
justTougher
theinlobby
number
rules should notThey
and better
register. only are
balanced
applynotfortransparent
with lobbyists
interactions at with
but all
alsoother
the institutions.
stakeholdersStrii
All EU decision-makers Other (please
should elaborate
be banned from meeting
Meetings with
with
unregistered No lobbyists
big business opinion
lobbiesand should
should
be limited
be obliged
in number
to publish
and online
better
Meetings with big business Integrity;Equality
lobbies shouldof acc 75-80%
be limited in aller
Toughernumber Meetings
rules should f not
and betterNo only
opinion
balanced
applywithfor lobbyists
interactionsbut with
alsoother
the institutions.
stakeholder S
Other (please elaborate No opinion
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access;Othe oikeudenmukaisuus, rehThey
Meetings with big business lobbies are not transparent
should at all
be limited in number and better ba
In general this is true, butIntegrity;Equality
transparency in of ac Tougher
lobbying Orientierung
is morerules
thanam Gemeinw
should
just thenot They
lobby are notfortransparent
onlyregister.
apply lobbyists but at all
also the institutions. Stri
Other (please elaborate They are relatively tran
I would go much further Integrity;Other (please I would go much further They are not transparent at all
It is also a major founda Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
A seemingly transparent Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access;Othe No more privileged accesNo opinion
Integrity No opinion
Not only does transparenc Equality of access It is also about oversigh They are relatively tran
Other (please elaborate Ausgewogene Balance zw They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
In general this is true, Integrity;Equality of acc All EU decision-makers sThey are relatively tran
In general this is true, butIntegrity;Equality
transparency in of accessis more than just the lobby
lobbying Theyregister.
are relatively transparent
Ich EU
All denke solchen Gesprshould
decision-makers Integrity;Equality
be bannedoffrom access
meeting with unregisteredThey are not
lobbyists andtransparent
should be obliged to publish online lis
Meetings with big business Integrity;Equality
lobbies shouldofbeaccess
limited in number and betterThey balanced
are relatively
with interactions
tran with other stakeholders i
Wer bestimmt die Mastbe der Lobbyarbet? Ethisch untadelig und transparent sind doch uerst schwammige Begriffe.
Darlegung
Es kommt auf eine ausgewogene Gewichtung der Lobbyarbeit an. Und diese ist momentan m.E. nichtall
smtlicher LoOther (please elaborate offene Darlegung der KoThey are not transparent at gegeben.
All
DieEU decision-makers
Einflunahme sIntegrity;Equality
bestimmter Gruppen und of Institutionnen
acc Tougher rules should notTheyund
ist berdimensional are nicht
not transparent
mit dem Anspruch nach einer transpa
Lobbyarbeit mub zwingend Integrity;Equality of access
ffentlich und sauber dokumentiert sein. Alle Brger They are not transparent
mssen berblick berat all die Einflunahme bes
Integrity;Equality of ac Volle Transparenz smmtThey are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
MEPs are paid to express Other (please elaborate lobbyists should be bannThey are not transparent
wergeneral
In bestimmt
thiswas ethisch
is true, butOtransparency
ther (please elaborate
in lobbying keinerlei
is morewirtschaftlich
than just the lobbyTheyregister.
are not transparent
All EU decision-makers Integrity;Equality
should be banned of access
from meeting
Meetings withwith
unregistered
a) But lobbying has to be fully transparent. That means more than just a lobbying big businessThey areregister.
lobbyists
lobbies not
and transparent
shouldshould at all
be limited
be obliged
in number
to publish
and online
better lis
ba
Meetings with big business Other
lobbies
(please
should
elaborate
be limited
Tougher
in number
rules
b) All EU decision makers must be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists.should
and better
not No
only
balanced
opinion
apply with
for lobbyists
interactionsbut with
also other
the institutions.
stakeholdersStri i
Integrity;Equality
c) The above must be obliged to publish on line all of accessa)Refer
meetingsto d)with
above. They are not transparent
lobbyists and must also apply to all EU employees not just se
d) Meetingsthis
In general must be balanced
is true, butIntegrity;Equality
to includeinstakeholders
transparency of ac b)Tougher
lobbying and other
is more rulesjust
than civil
shouldsociety
the not
Noonly
lobby organisations,
opinion
apply for lobbyists
register. NOT ONLY but BIG
also BUSINESS
the institutions.
CONC S
Integrity;Equality
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meetingof access Meetings
with unregistered They
with big business are
lobbyists not
lobbies transparent
andshould
shouldbe at all
belimited
obliged in to
number
publishandonline
better
lis
Meetings with big business Other
lobbies
(please
should
elaborate
be limited Tougher
in number
Meetings rules
with and
bigshould
betternot
businessNobalanced
only
opinion
apply
lobbies with for
should interactions
lobbyists
be limitedbutwith
in also
other
number thestakeholders
institutions.
and better baSi
Meetings with big busineOther (please elaborate Tougher rules should notThey only are
applyrelatively
for lobbyists
tran but also the institutions. Stri
In general this is true, No opinion Tougher rules should notNo opinion
Bei aufgeklrten und int Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
All EU decision-makers sIntegrity;Equality of ac Independent assessmentThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Meetings with big busineOther (please elaborate Tougher rules should notNo opinion
Anything less lends itse Integrity;Equality of acc Current method tips balan They are not transparent at all
Citizens of the EU shoul Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Lobbyarbeit ist nie positivEquality of access They are not transparent at all
Meetings with big busineIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
die Unabhngigkeit beraIntegrity;Equality of acc Lobbyarbeit mu Transpa They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Fr die Teilnahme von L Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Lobbyarbeit ist im echte Integrity;Equality of ac ffentlich zugngliche They are not transparent at all
WeInare convinced
general this isthat
true,adIbut
ntegrity;Equality
transparency of in access
lobbying is more than just theThey lobbyare relatively tran
register.
Integrity;Equality
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meetingof access Meetings with
with
unregistered They
big business are notand
lobbyists
lobbies transparent
shouldshould
be limited
be obliged
in number
to publish
and online
better
Meetings with big business Equality of access
lobbies should be limited Tougher
in number
rules should
and better They
not areapply
only relatively
balanced with transparent
for lobbyists
interactions but with
alsoother
the institutions.
stakeholder S
Other (please elaborate No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac In order to rule out unfa They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Other (please elaborate Wichtig
Das ist u.mit
Treffen a. Lobbyis
die Sicherstellung,
No opinion dass nicht lediglich
In general this is true, but transparency in lobbying is more than just the
Partikularinteressen lobby
derjenigen register.
zum Zuge kommen,
All EU decision-makers Integrity;Equality
should be bannedoffrom accessmeeting
Meetings
die besonderswith
with
unregistered
big business
viele
They
finanzielle
are relatively
lobbyists
lobbies and
should
Ressourcen shouldtransparent
be
fr limited
be obliged
die in number
to publish
Interessenvertretungand online
better lis
b
Equality of access
Meetings with big business lobbies should be limited Tougher
in number
rules
aufbringen knnen. should
and better
notNo onlyopinion
balanced
apply with
for lobbyists
interactions but with
also other
the institutions.
stakeholders Str
Other (please elaborate Zustzlich sollte Bercksichtigung No opinionfinden, dass ffentliche Behrden der
In general this is true, Integrity;Equality of ac Mitgliedstaaten
Meetings with big aufbusines No opinion
nationaler,
Integrity;Equality of access regionaler und lokaler Ebene Theysowieare notihre Gremien, at
transparent Zusammenschlsse
all und V
Lobbyarbeit mu transpaIntegrity;Other (please wie Meindie EU-Institutionen
Eindruck ist, da They are not transparent at all
Wenn es keine Entkoppelu Integrity;Other (please Wichtig Teil
Wofr ist u. a.
derstehen die Sicherstellung,
Multi-Level-Governance
unsere VertThey areinnot dass
der nicht lediglich
Europischen
transparent Union und dem Gemein
at all
Partikularinteressen
verpflichtet sind. Ihrederjenigen
Teilhabe am zum Zuge kommen, und ihre Abstimmung mit
Legislativprozess
Integrity;Equality of acc Posebej pomembno je nae They are relatively tran
die
denbesonders viele finanzielle
EU-Institutionen hat daher Ressourcen
eine andere fr die Interessenvertretung
Qualitt als das Lobbying durch
Integrity;Equality
Entgegen der in den Medien teilweise verbreiteten of accessaufbringen
private
Ansicht,oder knnen.
dass
wirtschaftliche They are notSie
Akteure. transparent
unterliegen at auch
all selbst
Lobbyarbeit hat immer dOther (please
Lobbying/Interessenvertretung per se problematisch elaborate Interessensvertreter
Zustzlich
sei, ist sollte
Antikorruptionsregelungen hanThey
Bercksichtigung
die Wichtigkeit are not transparent
(z. B. finden, at all3 Abs.
dass ffentliche
42 BeamtenStG, Behrden
2 TVD). der
Der
Essential for a healthy Equality of
hervorzuheben, dass Expertise auf direktem Wege access Big business
Mitgliedstaaten
Verhaltenskodex has far
auf too They
nationaler,
an die Entscheidungstrger are not transparent
der EU entspricht ohnehin den ethischen Anforderungen an
Mit den Adjektiven
weitergegeben wird,ethisch untadelig
um Integrity;Equality
eine und transparent
hinreichende ofFaktenbasis wirzu
ac regionaler
ffentlichenhier volle
und Zustimmung
lokaler
schaffen.
Dienst. Ebene
Theysowiesuggeriert.
are Solche
ihre Gremien,
relatively tran Art von Fragestellungen
Zusammenschlsse undw V
Die Relitt der Lobbyarbeit schaut jedoch of
Integrity;Equality anders
access als die
wie untadelig und transparent
EU-Institutionen They are aus.not
Nicht umsonst at
transparent wenden
all sich die Brger zu
Vielseitig Informationen Equality of access Teil der Multi-Level-Governance
Zuarbeit und Beratung mThey areinnot dertransparent
Europischen Union und dem Gemein
Solche Vorschlge wren unter anderen: verpflichtet sind. Ihre Teilhabe am Legislativprozess und ihre Abstimmung mit
1) Entscheidungstrger drfen Integrity sich nicht mit unregistrierten
Treffen mit Lobbyisten
Lobbyistenhat They
treffen.
von are not
groen transparent in at all Anzahl beschrnkt w
den EU-Institutionen daher eineFirmen
anderesolltenQualitt derals das Lobbying durch
It must
Entgegenbe fully transpa
2) Entscheidungstrger
der in den Medien Integrity;Equality
mssen of
ihre Treffen
teilweise acc See first
mit Lobbyisten
verbreiteten private
Ansicht, comment.
oder Mayb
verffentlichen. They
wirtschaftlicheDas
dass are relatively
betrifft
Akteure. Sie alle transparent
30,000 Beamte.
unterliegen auch selbst
Solange
3) Treffendurch diese Lobb
mit Lobbyisten
Lobbying/Interessenvertretung Integrity;Equality
von international ofagierenden
access
per se problematisch Strenge Firmen
Verhaltensregeln
diesollten
Antikorruptionsregelungen
sei, ist in der
Wichtigkeit They
fr are
Anzahl
(z.die not
42 transparent
B. Parlamentarier
beschrnkt
BeamtenStG, werdenat all
und Kommissionsmitgliedern
und
3 Abs.nur2inTVD).
ausgegliche
Der
Other (please
hervorzuheben, dass Expertise auf direktem Wege elaborate Verhaltenskodex
an die Entscheidungstrger No opinion
der EU entspricht ohnehin den ethischen Anforderungen an
weitergegeben
In general this iswird,
true,um
butIntegrity;Equality
eine hinreichende
transparency in ofFaktenbasis
ac ffentlichen
lobbying is more zu schaffen.
Dienst.
than Theyregister.
just the lobby are relatively tran
All EU decision-makers should Integrity;Equality
be bannedoffromaccess
meeting
Meetings withwith
unregistered
big business They are not
lobbyists
lobbies and transparent
shouldshouldbe limitedat all
be obligedin number
to publish
and online
better lis
ba
Meetings with big business Otherlobbies
(please
should
elaborate
be limited
Tougher
in number
rules should
and better notNoonly
balanced
opinion
applywith
for lobbyists
interactions but with
alsoother
the institutions.
stakeholdersStrii
Seul les lobbys dfendant Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Selbst wenn es von den Equality of access;Othe Es muss sich um PersonThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Ik
In ben het er
general thisgedeeltelij
is true, butIntegrity;Equality
transparency in of accessis more than just the lobby
lobbying Theyregister.
are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists They are relatively
and should transparent
be obliged to publish online lis
Lobbyist
Meetings should
with big be forbi
business Other (please
lobbies elaborate
should be No
limited gifts
Meetings
in OR
number money
with big
and
In general this is true, but transparency in lobbying is more than just the lobby register. accep
business
better T hey are
balanced
lobbies not
withtransparent
should interactions
be at with
limited all
in number
other stakeholders
and better bai
Other (please elaborate
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting Tougher
Es solltewith
Meetings rules
ein
with should
besseres
unregistered not
big business No
only opinion
apply
Gleichgewicht
lobbyists
lobbiesand for lobbyists
zwischen
shouldshould but
Treffen
be limited
be also
inmit
obliged the institutions.
toLobbyisten
numberpublish derStri
and online
better Gr
lis
ba
Other (please elaborate
Meetings with big business lobbies should be limited Es sollten
Tougher
in number klare und
rules should relativ
and better They
not only strenge
are
balanced relatively
Regeln
applywith geschaffen
tran
for lobbyists
interactions but withwerden
alsoother fr den
the institutions.Wechs
stakeholdersStrii
Other (please elaborate No opinion
Sehr wichtig ist u. a. die Sicherstellung, dass nicht lediglich Partikularinteress
Zustzlich sollte Bercksichtigung finden, dass ffentliche Behrden der Mitg
regionaler und lokaler Ebene sowie ihre Gremien, Zusammenschlsse und V
wie die EU-Institutionen Teil der Multi-Level-Governance in der Europischen
verpflichtet sind. Ihre Teilhabe am Legislativprozess und ihre Abstimmung mit
den EU-Institutionen hat daher eine andere Qualitt als das Lobbying durch
Toute
In
Entgegen rencontre
general thisin
der isavec
den des
butEquality
true,Medien of access;Othe
transparency
teilweise in lobbying
verbreiteten Les
is rgles
more
private
Ansicht,oder doivent
than
dass just tre clThey
the lobby
wirtschaftliche are relatively
register.
Akteure. tran
Sie unterliegen auch selbst
No
All lobbying!
EU decision-makers Other
should (please
be banned
Lobbying/Interessenvertretung per se problematisch elaborate
from No lobbying.....since
meeting
Meetings withwith
unregistered
big
Antikorruptionsregelungen it
business c They are
lobbyists
lobbies
sei, ist die Wichtigkeit (z. B. 42 BeamtenStG,not
and transparent
shouldshould
be limited
be obliged
in3 number
to publish
Abs. and online
2 TVD). better
Der lis
ba
Meetings with bigdass
hervorzuheben, businessIntegrity;Other
lobbies
Expertise auf should
(please
direktem beWege
limited
Tougher
anindie
number
rules
Verhaltenskodex should
and better
Entscheidungstrger
der notNo
EU only
balanced
opinion
applywith
entspricht for lobbyists
ohnehininteractionsbut with
alsoother
den ethischen the institutions.
stakeholders
Anforderungen Stri
ani
weitergegeben wird, um Integrity;Equality
eine hinreichendeofFaktenbasis
ac ffentlichen zu schaffen.
Dienst. They are relatively tran
Wir stimmen insoweit zu,Integrity;Equality of acc Wir verstehen gleichbereThey are relatively tran
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;Other (please Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Le lobbying est par esseIntegrity et les conflits d'intrt They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Grundstzlich wird Tran Integrity;Equality of access;Other (please elabo They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access Die Expertise lokaler undThey regionaler Gebietskrperschaften
are relatively transparent und ihrer Verbn
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
There
Lobbying should
is anbeessential
no meetin Other
part of(please
the democratic Die
elaborateprocess.
Sincederzeit
Meetings geltenden
with
communication Regeln
big busineThey
Organisations such
is theas unterscheiden
are
essence notof
interest goodaber
transparent
groups, zwischen
policy making,zwei grundstzlico
the introduction
representative bodies, industry, NGOs, charities
Integrity;Equality of access and third party professional lobbyists all provide
They are relatively transparent
necessary input and fromfeedback through communication Die Expertise
In orderof their lokalerand
to maintain
views undconcerns
these regionaler
information Gebietskrperschaften undofficials
ihrer Verbn
I separate advocacy Integrity;Equality of access They are to government.
channels
relatively between public
transparent and i
This interaction is
Transparenter Lobbyismu a welcome and necessary element
Integrity;Equality of ac Treffen of policy development.
mit groen Wirts Following
No opinion the commencement of the Regulation o
continue to actively facilitate and encourage suchDie By derzeit
doing,geltenden
communications
so the intention
to the Regeln is tounterscheiden
greatest normalise
extent possible.
thoseaber zwischen zwei and
communications grundstzlic
let every
Interessenvertretung ist Integrity;Equality of acc Es geht auch darum, dieThey are relatively tran
Oberste
The Act doesPrioritt
not sollte Integrity;Equality
aim to prevent of acc The
or inhibit lobbying activity.
moveIts to objective
a more open is They
toand
make are relatively
transparent
the process tran
approach to consultation on public
Equality of access
more transparent while supporting the interaction of public bodies with all stakeholder They are relatively transparent
Oberste Prioritt sollt
organisations. Integrity Eineextent
The transparente
of lobbyingVerwaThey
activity areis a relatively
good measure tran of an engaged citizenry but
Integrity;Equality of ac They are highly transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
We fully support ethical Integrity;Equality of access Treffen mit Lobbyisten groer They Firmen
are relatively
solltren tran
in der Zahl begrenzt sein und in
Financer un budget plaidIntegrity;Equality of acc Compenser l'ingalit paThey are not transparent
Strengere Regeln sollten nicht nur fr Lobbyisten gelten, sondern auch fr di
Generell sehe ich das soOther (please elaborate Die Expertise lokaler undNo opinion Gebietskrperschaften und ihrer Verbn
regionaler
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity Die derzeit geltenden Regeln They unterscheiden
are relatively tran aber zwischen zwei grundstzlic
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Alle Treffen von EU-Ver Integrity;Other (please Bei professionelle Lobb They are not transparent
Allen EU-Entscheidungstr Other (please elaborate Treffen mit groen Wirts No opinion
Integrity;Equality of ac ben Ich gehekommunikation
davon aus, dass omThey dmit "Integritt"
are relatively dietransparent
mglichst vollstndige bereins
Hier muss durchgehend I1ntegrity;Equality of acc Wenn Other. mit "gleichberichtigtem They Zugang"
are not transparent
gemeint ist, dass jeder Interessierte, o
Equality of access
In general this is true, but transparency in lobbying is more than just the lobby register. They are relatively transparent
Der
All EUAussage wird insofern
decision-makers zugestimmt,
Equality
should ofbannedalsfrom
access Lobbying ethischen undbusiness
transparenten
They areRegeln
relatively unterworfen
transparent inwerden sollte. Jedoch bai
Transparency is more than just be
a lobbying meeting
Meetings
register. withwith
unregistered
big lobbyists
lobbies and
shouldshould
be limited
be obliged number
to publish
and online
better lis
Meetings with big business Other
lobbies
(please
should
elaborate
be limited
Tougher
Die Expertise lokaler und regionaler Gebietskrperschaften und ihrer Verbni
in number
rules should
and better
not Noonly
balanced
opinion
apply with
for lobbyists
interactionsbut with
also other
the institutions.
stakeholders Stri
Wie schon eine Studie der Bundesarbeitskammer (BAK) aus dem Jahr 2012 gezeigt hat, sind ArbeitnehmerInnen in Brssel st
Oberste
All Prioritt sollte Integrity
EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting Die derzeit
Meetings with geltenden
with
unregistered
bigDas Regeln
business They unterscheiden
are relatively
lobbyists
lobbies and
shouldshouldtran
be aber zwischen
limited
be obliged
in ein
numberzwei
tohnlich
publishgrundstzlic
and online
better lis
ba
https://media.arbeiterkammer.at/wien/MWUG_Ausgabe_113.pdf). EU-Transparenzregister zeichnet dramatisc
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Meetings
Schon seitwith big business
Jahren Other
setzt sich lobbies
die(please
BAK should
elaborate
gegen bedie
limited
Tougher
in number
Dominanz
Es sollte rules
fr
von should
and better
jede/n
WirtschaftnotTheyonly
balanced
Interessierte/n
und are
apply not
Finanzen with
fortransparent
lobbyists
interactions
ersichtlich
in sein,but
Europa mitwith
ein also
und other
the
welchen institutions.
stakeholders
ist bestrebt,
LobbyistInnenStri
dass ai
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Ein aufflliges oder grundlegendes Problem im Verhltnis zwischen europis
Die BAK ist seit 2010 Mitglied Integrity;Equality
bei ALTER-EU of ac
(Alliance
Wie bereits
for Lobbying
Die Expertise in lokaler
der vorhergehenden
and undTransparency
No opinionFrage
regionaler and erwhnt,
Ethics Regulation)
Gebietskrperschaftenergeben und jngste
undihrer
untersttzt
Auswertu
Verbn
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity;Equality
Die Bayerische Staatsregierung stimmt dieser Aussage of acc Die derzeit
Aus diesem geltenden
voll zu. Grunde Regeln
Die BeteiligungThey
ist es aberder unterscheiden
are relatively
auch
relevanten tran
aber
entscheidend, zwischen
Akteuredass zwei
ermglicht
eine klare grundstzlic
es, Untersch
erfolgrei
Other (please elaborate They are relatively tran
Transparente Lobbyarbeit Integrity;Equality of ac Die Anzahl der Treffen miThey are not transparent
Integrity Die Expertise lokaler undThey are highly
regionaler transparent
Gebietskrperschaften und ihrer Verbn
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity Die derzeit geltenden Regeln They unterscheiden
are relatively tran aber zwischen zwei grundstzlic
Integrity;Equality of ac Responsibility & AccountThey are relatively tran
Transparenz in der Lobby Integrity They are relatively tran
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac PLURALIDAD They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access Of course it is also a ma They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are
Es muss sichergestellt werden, relatively
dass transparentInteressen gleichberec
unterschiedliche
Transparente LobbyarbeiIntegrity;Equality of ac Die Kommunalbehrden They sind dem
are relatively
Gemeinwohltran verpflichtet und unterliegen ih
Lobbyists can provide exIntegrity;Equality of acc Equality of access includThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Lobbying is essential to Integrity;Equality of ac It is right the EU Instit They are relatively tran
The more arguments andIntegrity They are relatively tran
n Romnia nu exist o LIntegrity;Equality of acc Profesionalism atestat iThey are relatively tran
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Other (please Responsability They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of acc The should be more public They are relatively tran
Es geht darum, FehlentwIntegrity;Equality of ac Entscheidungen drfen nThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
we fully agree and joine Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
The EU should commit an Integrity;Equality of acc There should be some audi They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Transparency register heEquality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of ac spjno z reguami dia They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac there has to be no disc They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Presumo che al fine di ri Integrity;Equality of ac L'integrit non pu esserThey are relatively tran
Other (please elaborate Exclure de la liste des They are relatively transparent
fra gli Enti da consultar Integrity;Equality of ac onest, legalit, corrett They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality
Der er et misfohold imellem de lobbyer som of reprsenter
access store firmaer, og They
de somarereprsenterer
relatively transparent
befolkningen interesser. De s
Integrity
Lobbyerne skal vre ligeligt fordelt, s den svage gruppe(de borgere somThey skal are
leverelatively transparent fr en meget strre s
under afgrelserne)
Der er et stort misfohold Equality
i hvor parlementsmedlemmerne
of access S lnge frde
deres
nationale
oplysninger,
meThey are
og hvilket
not transparent
pres(hvis i ikke-s gr vi...) de bliver
No opinion No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Es kann nicht angehen, Integrity;Equality of ac Normalbrger Zugang zuThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Just They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
proper information aboutIntegrity They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
It would be ideal to hav Integrity;Equality of ac Citizens should have equa They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access
Transparente Lobbyarbeit wirkt sich auf Politikentwicklung
Integritt, nur dann positivThey
gleichberechtigteraus,are
und relatively
wenn bei dertransparent
uneingeschrnkter
Bewertung
Zugang
der Beitrge
zu Informationen
nicht die
No opinion They are relatively tran
VORSCHLAG: Integrity;Equality of ac Los valores de responsabilidad,
VORSCHLAG: They aretransparencia,
highly transparent
sostenibilidad, compromiso,
Alle Beitrge von Lobbyisten,
Integrity;Equality
die in Konsultationen
of acc Informationen
zu laufendenmitRechtssetzungsverfahren
Geheimhaltungsklassen
They are relativelyeingehen,
zu
tran
versehen
sollten
und nach
Lobbyisten
EU-Postein
zur G
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Lobbying ALWAYS favours Integrity;Equality of acc How can it possibly be They are not transparent
Fr was brauchen wir be Other (please elaborate Lobbyisten mssen einfaThey are not transparent
The question is ambiguoOther (please elaborate Politicians hold public p They are relatively tran
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc Large corporations seemThey t are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
This should not only appIntegrity;Equality of ac morality and openness inThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Other (please Those lobbying should bThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
No opinion No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Non corporate lobbying m Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Certaines organisations Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
To achieve a sound framework for highly
relations with lobbyists, the following would
Integrity;Equality of access They are transparent
Integrity;Equality of access 1) Stopping the privileged They
accessare by relatively
business transparent
interests: Lobbyists representi
Integrity 2) Stopping lobbying on behalf They are highlyindustries:
of 'toxic' transparent Industries that are in clear
Integrity;Equality of access 3) Ethics rules for those in They
the are not transparent
institutions: at all not just focus on lob
Rules should
We believe that lobbyingOther (please elaborate They are relatively tran
Integrity Die Expertise lokaler undThey are highly
regionaler transparent
Gebietskrperschaften und ihrer Verbn
Oberste Prioritt sollte Equality of access Die derzeit geltenden Regeln They unterscheiden
are relatively tran aber zwischen zwei grundstzlic
Integrity;Other (please Wahrung der Unabhngike They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac respect, mutual recognit They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Restarting the Future believes that achieving appropriate lobbying regulation
But the Commission serviIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity Meetings
A mandatory withregister withThey
big business are relatively
lobbies
appropriate should
sanctionstran
be limited
would in ensure
numberthat andlobbyists
better bap
It is absolutely essential Other (please elaborate Tougher rules should notThey only areapply notfortransparent
lobbyists but also the institutions. Stri
Integrity;Equality of access A recent conflict of interest Theyscandal in Italy involving
are relatively tran the Italian Minister of Eco
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
In general, ethical and transparent
Equality oflobbying
access helpsTo policy
achieve
development
a sound framework
andThey
it is important
arefor relatively
relations
to make with sure
lobbyists,
transparent that thetheprocesses
following would to se
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Transparent lobbying is about more than just the Stopping EU's lobby the
transparency
privileged access
register. byThe
business
Commissioninterests: should
Lobbyists
extend representing
the wider t
Equality of access No opinion
CEO
In derconsiders
Gesellschaftthat,wir
in general, ethical and
Integrity;Equality oftransparent
acc Stopping lobbyingder
Die Akzeptanz hasEurop
the potential
Theyofare torelatively
help policy trandevelopment and it is importan
Meanwhile, the European Ombudsman has seriously criticised
lobbying
the Commission
on behalf for
toxicitsindustries:
poor implementation
An ethical approach
of the World to lobbyin
Health
The registry provides oneIntegrity;Equality of acc Ethics are really very i They are highly transpar
The Commission's November 2014 transparency There reforms areapply
various
onlyadditional
to the topaspects
250 or so of ethical
most senior lobbying.
officials in the Commissio
However, it should be pointed Integrity;Equality
out that lobbying
of ac which
In addition,
is transparent
we thinkisstrong
notNoalways
lobbying
opinion ethical.
regulation
Lobbyists would
may provide
make a fullclear
disclosures
and una
Stopping the privileged access by business interests: Lobbyists representing
IThethink it is very valuab Integrity;Equality of access
tobacco industry is a sector that should be treated Prioritising
with extreme
the public They
caution.
interest: Theare
Public relatively
EU institutions transparent
and privatemust (business)
implement interests
the World
very ofte
He
Integrity;Equality of access Preventing unscrupulousThey are relatively
lobbying: Lobbyingtran in the context of a conflict of inte
Transparency is only oneIntegrity;Equality
element, albeit an of essential
accessSeverely
one, restricting
of ethical lobbying.Theyon
lobbying are
But relatively
behalf
ethical transparent
oflobbying
'toxic' industries:
goes far beyond
The WHOs transparen
FCTC
Other (please elaborate Ethics rules for those in the No institutions:
opinion It is not just about rules for lobbyists,
It depends primarily on Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Direi che addirittura neEquality of access Ritengo inoltre che si d They are highly transpar
Yes. But there should b Integrity;Equality of ac To open the possibility f They are not transparent at all
In general Integrity;Equality
this is true,lobiranje
but transparency of access theThey are relatively transparent
Etino in transparentno je gotovoinpomemben
lobbying Meetings
Nujno isdejavnik
more
je trebawith
than
pribig
just business
uravnoteiti
pripravi lobby lobbies
zakonodaje.
lobiranje.register.should
Trenutno
Bistveno be limited
levji
pa dele
je, dainsestankov
number
je lobiranje and better
odpade
**tudi vn
All EU decision-makers Integrity;Equality
should be banned of access
from meeting
Tougherwithrulesunregistered
should not They areapply
lobbyists
only relatively
and tran bebut
for should
lobbyists obliged
also theto publish
institutions.
onlineS
Meetings
Trenutno se with bigobusiness
pravila Otherlobbies
(pleaseshould
transparentnosti elaborate
nanaajo be limited
le
Pomemben in number
na zelo ozek deland
korak better
No opinion
kuradnikov
etinemu balanced
EU,
lobiranju with
priblinobi bil,interactions
250daoseb. Tawith
se dosledno other
seznam uvede stakeholder
je potrebno
konvenci
Integrity They are relatively transparent
It is important
Poleg to check Integrity;Other
(ne)transparentnosti (please
je problem tudi, da so Lobbyists
doloenejeshould
Dodatno skupine
potrebnoprovide
lobistovThey
uvesti are notintransparent
tevilno
regulativo, po
finanno
kateri lani
velikoevropskih
monejeinstitucij
od drugih (tudi
sk
Equality of access;Othe They are relatively tran
fucking jewish kibbutz !!!Other (please elaborate bullshit !!! They are not transparent
Commission official meets an unregistered lobbyist balance
and sointhat stakeholder
Partikularinteressen all lobby meetings
representation.
derjenigen heldZuge
zum are
Thekommen,
most effective, and ethical, way to
recorded online. This would ensure a further 30,000 aufbringen
privileged knnen.
die or moreaccess
besonders individuals
viele to finanzielle
theareCommission
coveredRessourcen by businessfr die interests would be clear lim
Interessenvertretung
including those with high interactions with lobbyists Zustzlich
meetings
and those sollte
and with
otherBercksichtigung
serious
kinds input
of finden,
interactions
into the dass
with bigffentliche
business Behrden
lobbyists, deras to
so
aufbringen knnen.
policy drafting process. Mitgliedstaaten
with access by auf nationaler,
other stakeholders, including civil society organisations.
Zustzlich sollte Bercksichtigung finden, dass ffentliche Behrden der
Meanwhile, the European Ombudsman has seriously regionaler
Stopping
criticised undthe
lobbying lokaler Ebeneofsowie
Commission
on behalf for itsihre
'toxic' poor Gremien,
industries: AnZusammenschlsse
ethical to und V
Mitgliedstaaten auf nationaler, regionaler und lokaler Ebeneapproach
sowie ihre lobby
Grem
implementation of the World Health Organisation's wie die
ensure
FrameworkEU-Institutionen
that the Convention
Worldhat Healthon Tobacco
Organisation's Framework Convention
den EU-Institutionen
Wichtig ist u. a. die Sicherstellung,daher einedass anderenicht Qualitt
lediglich Lobbyingondurch
alsPartikularinteressen
das Tobac
d
Control and the Commission should immediately fully Teil der
publish Multi-Level-Governance
implemented,
details of allasmeetings
recently within der Europischen
demanded by the European UnionOmbudsman,
und dem Gemein and
private
die oder
besonders wirtschaftliche
viele finanzielle Akteure.
RessourcenSie unterliegen
fr die auch selbst
Interessenvertretung aufbr
tobacco lobbyists online.Equality of access verpflichtet
with the tobacco sind. Ihre Teilhabe
industry are am Legislativprozess
really kept to an absolute und ihre Abstimmung mit
Antikorruptionsregelungen
Zustzlich sollte Bercksichtigung No opinion
(z. B. finden,
42 BeamtenStG,
dass 3minimum
ffentliche Abs. as is require
2 TVD).
Behrden Der
However, it should be pointed out that lobbying den EU-Institutionen
which
regulation.
is transparent is hat
not daher
always eine andere
ethical. Qualitt als das Lobbyingder Mitg
durch
Entgegen der in den MedIntegrity;Equality of ac regionaler Verhaltenskodex und der EU
lokaler They
entspricht
Ebene are relatively
sowie ohnehin
ihre tran
den ethischen
Gremien, Anforderungen
Zusammenschlsse undan V
Entgegen
Lobbyists mayder inmake
den Medien teilweiseaccording
full disclosures verbreiteten
toprivate
Ansicht,
Ethics
the oder
rules,
rules dass
but wirtschaftliche
forif those theAkteure.
certainininterests institutions: Sie Itunterliegen auch selbst
is not just about rules for lobbyists,
Transparenz in der Lobby
Lobbying/Interessenvertretung I ntegrity;Equality
perand of ac
se ifproblematischTeil der Multi-Level-Governance
Antikorruptionsregelungen
sei, ist They are inrelatively
der Europischen
tran Union und dem Gemein
outnumber
In general, and outspend
ethical andbegr others,
transparent lobbyingthey helps
receive
need
To greater
policy
achieve be die
todevelopment
or
far Wichtigkeit
privileged
tougher
a sound framework
and it (z.
codes
access B.for
of to relations
42 BeamtenStG,
conduct
is important toand make rules
with forthat
sure 3 Abs.
the2processes
individuals
lobbyists, the TVD).
with the
following Der
toinst
wouldse
Der Deutsche
hervorzuheben,
decision-makers, Verein
dass
and Integrity;Equality
Expertise
then manageauf direktem
to of access
secure Wege Verhaltenskodex
an
policies
those die
or
who Entscheidungstrger
ruleshave which der
recentlyEU
are They
entspricht
contrary
left. are
Such torelatively
ohnehin
the
rules transparent
would,den ethischen
for example, Anforderungen
prevent MEPs anh
A transparent and open dialogue between the EU institutions and all relevant stakeholders is vital for high quality EU policy-ma
weitergegeben
public interest, wird,
then um Integrity;Equality
eine
arguably hinreichende
this is not ofFaktenbasis
access
ethical ffentlichen
lobbying
side zu
jobs
and schaffen.
and/
it Dienst.
will
or not
blockhelptheThey
the are relatively
revolving
quality and
door tran
between the EU institutions and the
Transparent lobbying is about more than just the Stopping EU's lobby the transparency
privileged access register. byThebusiness
Commission interests: should
Lobbyists
extend representing
the wider t
BUSINESSEUROPE Integrity;Equality
legitimacy of policy development.
itself lists its Lobbying
meetings ofis
acnotleaders
with lobby
ethically
The EU institutionsThey
industry.
ofneutral.
representativeness, in its are
relevance weeklyrelatively
andNewsletter tran Headlines,
expertise of the stakeholders
and letters,concern
pos
Other (please
Meanwhile, the European Ombudsman has seriously elaborate Stopping
criticised
lobbyingthe Commission They
on behalf of for are relatively
'toxic'
its poor
industries:tran
implementation
An ethical of approach
the World to Health
lobby
BUSINESSEUROPE fullyIntegrity;Othersupported the(please aims of the
BUSINESSEUROPE
European Commission willThey
continue
to increase
are relatively
providing
transparency
tran
constructive
sincesupport
their conception
and therefo 10
However, it should be pointed Other out(please
that lobbying
elaboratewhich
Ethics is rules
transparent
for those is not
in the
They
always
institutions:
areethical.
not transparent
ItLobbyists
is not justmay aboutmake
rulesfullfordisclosures
lobbyists,
various opinions should Equality of access integrity cannot be be e They are relatively tran
El proceso debera ser cNo opinion They are not transparent
El proceso debera ser cNo opinion Die Regulierung der Interessenvertretung They are not transparent gegenber den EU-Institutionen so
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Die deutsche Wirtschaft Integrity;Other (please Der BDI und die BDA sprechen They are sich
relatively
selbstverstndlich
tran dafr aus, dass - basi
El proceso debera ser cNo opinion They are not transparent
The dominance of the priIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
El proceso debera ser cNo opinion They are not transparent
El proceso debera ser cNo opinion They are not transparent
El proceso debera ser cNo opinion They are not transparent
While we fully agree wit Equality of access equality of access but They are not transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
State of Law Other (please elaborate Minimum level of coruptioThey are relatively transparent
Dans le mesure d'un quiEquality of access;Othe l'quilibre des moyens etThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc Equality of information They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity Make sure that the stakeThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Um ein effektiven und soliden Rahmenhighlyfr Lobbying zu errichten, ist auch folg
Integrity;Equality of access They are transparent
1. Privilegierter Zugang fr Wirtschaftsinteressen muss gestoppt werden. D
Integrity;Equality of access 2. Lobbying fr gemeinwohlschdliche They are relatively tran
Interessen (toxic Lobbying) muss g
A transparent lobbying m Equality of
1. Grundstzlich kann ethisches und transparentesaccess;Othe Public has
3. Ethisches to be informe
Lobbying Politikentwicklung No opinion
Lobbying verlangtpositiv auch nach frdern. ethischen Regeln fr die Instituti
2. Zu beachten ist aber, Integrity;Equality
dass transparentes of access
Lobbying
4. Insgesamt
mehr verlangt drfenals sichThey
selbst are
solche relatively
durch
weiteren transparent
ein anspruchsvolles
Vorgaben neben Lobbyregister
den Transparen sich
3. Auerdem ist zu beachten, Integrity;Equality
dasstransparentes
of ac Lobbying nicht automatisch No opinionethisches Lobbying bedeutet. Auch wenn Lobb
Um ein effektiven und soliden Rahmen fr Lobbying zu errichten, ist auch folg
Integrity They are relatively tran
1. Privilegierter Zugang fr Wirtschaftsinteressen muss gestoppt werden. D
1. Grundstzlich kann Integrity;Equality of access
ethisches und transparentes 2. Lobbying fr PolitikentwicklungThey arepositiv
gemeinwohlschdliche not transparent
frdern.
Interessen (toxic Lobbying) muss g
Integrity;Equality
2. Zu beachten ist aber, dass transparentes Lobbying of access3. Ethisches
mehr verlangt Lobbying They
als verlangt are
selbst durch relatively
auch ein
nach transparent
anspruchsvolles
ethischen Regeln Lobbyregister
fr die Instituti
sich
3. Auerdem ist zu beachten, Integrity;Equality of access
dass transparentes 4. Lobbying
Insgesamt nichtdrfen They
automatisch
sich are
solche relatively
ethisches
weiteren transparent
Lobbying
Vorgaben bedeutet.
neben den AuchTransparen
wenn Lob
Transparenz in der Lobbyarbeit Integrity;Equality
ist sehr zuofbefrworten.
ac No opinion
Die politische Mitgestaltung Integrity
von Kommunen und ihren Verbnden ist jedoch They vonare derrelatively
Lobbyarbeit tran politischer, wirtschaftlicher, s
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are not transparent
Those being lobbied need Integrity;Equality of acc A sound framework would They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are highly transparent
Il est certain que l'exp Integrity;Other (please L'expression d'une posit They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access No opinion
Lobbyarbeit ist akzeptabEquality of access;Othe Verhinderung und TranspThey are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access for all points of view is vital to ensure that public interests a
Integrity;Equality of access
Mandatory requirements for improved ethical andThe transparent
most effective
lobbying toThey
waywould stop are
not relatively
access
only to EUtran
inform the
institutions
development
by business
of balanced
interests
pol
Integrity;Equality of acc The
Es istpossibility given
sicherzustellen, t dassThey
In particular, the European Ombudsman has highlighted the lack of transparency of the Commission are
nicht relatively
lediglich tran
Partikularinteressen derjenigen
in their meetings ber
with tob
The Deutsche Post DHL Integrity;Equality
Gr of ac besonders
The
This serves to illustrate how rules are currently poorly
Other: regulationviele
implemented, offinanzielle
Compliance evenlobbyi TheyRessourcen
are
with International
those that are relatively fr
agreement die
tranInteressenvertretung
well defined (FCTC
by the
artUN aufbringe
5.3)Framework Co
EPHA responded to the GreenIntegrity;Equality
Paper on aofEuropean
ac The Transparency Initiative RegisterThey in
should
2006,
are not ensure
thetransparent
Civil
theSociety
properContact
implementation
Group (CSCG)
of inter
Integrity Zustzlich sollte Bercksichtigung They are highly finden,transparent
dass ffentliche Behrden der Mitg
regionaler und lokaler Ebene Theysowie ihre Gremien, Zusammenschlsse und V
Integrity;Equality of access are relatively transparent
Es sollte strengstens darauf geachtet werden, dass Teiljegliche
der Multi-Level-Governance
Einflussnahme von Organisationenin der Europischen und Personen,
Union und diedem
Einzelinter
Gemein
Transparenz in dem SinnEquality of access NIcht nuram
Die Expertise
Teilhabe Industrie,
lokaleraucundThey
Legislativprozess are
undnot
regionaler transparent at all
Gebietskrperschaften
ihre Abstimmung mit denund ihrer Verbn
EU-Institutionen
Oberste Prioritt sollte
Die kommunalen Integrity;Equalityund
Gebietskrperschaften of acc
ihreDie
als derzeit
Expertise
Verbnde
das geltenden
Lobbying lokaler
setzen durch Regeln
sichund
frThey unterscheiden
are
regionaler
private relatively tran
aber zwischen
Gebietskrperschaften
Gemeinwohlinteressen
oder wirtschaftliche Akteure. zwei
ein. und grundstzlic
ihrer Verbna
Sie unterliegen
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity;Equality of acc Die derzeit geltenden
Bei ihren Vertretern handelt es sich um direkt undAntikorruptionsregelungen Regeln
demokratisch gewhlte BrgermeisterThey unterscheiden
are highly
(z. B. 71 Abs. transpar
aber
und1Landrte,zwischen
BBG, 3 welche zwei
aufgrundstzlic
Abs. 2 TVD).nationaler
Der Veru
Interessenvertretungen. Integrity;Equality
Die Stadt Pforzheimof ac
erwartet,
ohnehin
Die dassden
Expertise dieethischen
Europische
lokaler Anforderungen
und They Kommission
are relatively
regionaler andiesem
den
tranffentlichen
deutlichenDienst.
Gebietskrperschaften Unterschied Rech
und ihrer Verbn
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity;Equality of acc Die derzeit geltenden Regeln They unterscheiden
are relatively tran aber zwischen zwei grundstzlic
Diese og Art von Lobbyi Integrity Eine Verwaltung ist tra They are relatively tran
Other (please elaborate Bercksichtigung der Rep They are highly transparent
*Ethical and transparent lobbying helps policy development.
AppropriateItlobbyingis important
regulation
to make is also
sure about
that the being
processes
balanced.
to secure ethical a
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;No opinion Eine transparente VerwaThey
It is crucial to allow equal access areforrelatively tran
all stakholders, including trade unions.
* Transparent lobbying isEquality of access
about more than just theFor
EU's thelobby
ETUC, collectiveThey
transparency are relatively
bargaining
register. and social transparent
dialogue need to be excluded
Integrity;Equality of acc InLobbying
many legal regulation
ordersisbutalThey
also at are relatively tran
international and European level, trade union
* It should be pointed outIntegrity;Equality
that lobbying which
of acc
is transparent
Die Expertise is not always
lokaler undethical.
They are relatively
regionaler tran
Gebietskrperschaften und ihrer Verbn
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity;Equality of acc Die derzeit geltenden Regeln
They unterscheiden
are relatively
Un dialogue ouvert et transparent entre les institutions de l'UE et toutes les parties prenantes est essentiel pour une tran
aber zwischen zwei grundstzlic
politique U
No opinion
Le MEDEF a toujours promu l'inscription au registre De de faontransparence
globale, la auprs No opinion
reprsentativit,
de ses fdrations
la pertinence membres.
et l'expertise des parties p
Le MEDEF soutient pleinement
Integrity;Equality
les objectifs
of de
ac laEnCommission
tant que partie pourprenante,
accrotre
Theyla leare
transparence.
MEDEFrelativelypoursuivra
tran son action constructive en
Maintaining qualified lo Equality of access Same
Die as above.
Expertise Theund
lokaler sheeThey are notGebietskrperschaften
regionaler transparent und ihrer Verbn
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity;Equality of acc Die derzeit geltenden Regeln They unterscheiden
are relatively tran aber zwischen zwei grundstzlic
Tout dpend de la dfini Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
La complexit des normes Integrity Laccs doit tre libre, They are highly transparent
There is often an import Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transpar
Integrity;Equality of access
Grundstzlich schafft Transparenz im Bereich der Interessenvertretung mehr They are relatively
Vertrauen transparent
und Rckhalt in die Politik, indem sie M
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Dem Austausch mit Interessenvertretern,
Integrity;Equality NGOs
of acc und
Bereitsanderen
jetzt haben
Akteuren man der They
Zivilgesellschaft
are relativelykommt tran eine erhebliche Bedeutung
No opinion They are
Selbstverstndlich befrwortet Daimler grundstzlichrelatively transparent den Zugang zu politisch
Integrity;Equality of access They are not
Darber hinaus sollten sich politische Entscheidungstrger transparent at all ffentlich vermeh
Integrity;Equality of accessEin vereinfachter ZugangThey are not transparent
der akkreditierten at all
Interessenvertreter in das Europ
Daimler macht sich fr Integrity;Other (please They are relatively tran
Sofern politische Entsch Integrity;Equality of ac Vorrangiger Blick fr di They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
OCCORRE, A MIO PAREIntegrity They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
lobbying (contact with E Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac publication of and open They are relatively tran
Dipende da cosa si intenIntegrity;Equality of acc Anche se la parit di ac They are relatively tran
Integrity has a particular relevance in this context, especially with regard to pr
Integrity;Equality of acc Transparency and intercoThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of accessThe Registers role in providing They are relatively
clearly transparent
readable information on EU funding re
Integrity;Equality of ac All organisations should They are relatively tran
As the representation of Integrity;Other (please The principle of proportionality, They are as relatively
enshrinedtran in Article 5 of the Treaty on Euro
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
- clear expectations of impartiality and fidelity to public interest;
enhance the quality of decision-making by providing should
- practical channels
be guidance
published;
for the on input how of to
valuable
deal with expertise.
gifts and hospitality,
- guidance on handling official information, and communication with third part
Lobbyists come in many forms as diverse as environmental -- makinga robustopen NGOs
system all or calls
of multinational
for applications
conflicts companies.
of interest tomanagement,
sit on advisory/expert groups and in
- periodic disclosure of interests, rules regarding incompatibility of simultaneo
Expertise is provided to policy makers on a daily basis criteria
- a rule bytotoprofessional
ensure
only meet a balanceconsultancies,
registered of different
lobbyists, lawinterests.
firms,
-Kommunale
control of the revolvingsind
Verbnde doors between Partner,
verlssliche the public and the Kommunalpolitiker
gewhlte private sectors, an
industry
Die Arbeit associations,
der Gemeinden labour unions, NGOs,
Integrity;Equality thinkReasoning
of acc tanks,
-Kommunen
sanctions religious
forsind communities
non-compliance They and
im Transparenzregister embassies.
are relatively demnach
transparent gleich zu behandeln wie d
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
We see, however, that the misbehaviour of a few Regulation is sufficient
Equality istoonly
of access discredit
one
can element
an strengthened
be entiretoprofession.
ensureby: fairThe lobbying. Enforcement of any re
Wir befrworten die Tra Integrity;Equality of access Die Expertise lokaler undThey regionalerare relatively tran
Gebietskrperschaften und ihrer Verbn
- approving legal requirements that allow citizens, interest groups and corpor
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity;Equality
risk of undue influence and corruption in the political of acc Die
broader derzeit
process geltenden
willingness
seriously Regeln
They unterscheiden
are relatively tran
aber zwischen zwei grundstzlic
- introducing
Transparency a legal by undermines
all actors involved
requirement on the functioning
public tobodies
act ethically,
of
to publish is crucial
the resultsto creating
of con
BASF is committed to traIntegrity;Equality of acc At -Oxfam BASF
making we
open consider
all calls both
for They are
applications relatively to sit tran
on advisory/expert groups anda in
believes that full lobbying transparency is the foundation on which m
a democracy. There is a Integrity;Equality
significant public of interest
access ethical
in ensuring
Transparency and fair the lobbying
transparency
International in
They public and
aredecision-making.
believes integrity
that fullof
relatively transparent
lobbying transparency is the foun
Une
As a transparence
Interestmember of EUtotale
representation Equality
and
Transparency lobbying ofRegister
access
is a vital partA
since Chaque
Reasoning
ofmandatory
2008, anyDI
continually partie
democracy
is aregisterdoit pouvo
coherent
strong closely
for They related
European
supporter
and open are arelatively
to universal
lobbyists
ofdialoguetransparent transparent
must
between values
and be such
set up
stakeholders
open asto freedom
dialogue shed
and theofEuro
light
between spe
on Ec
lobbying, as well as diversity of participation accessand contribution
For this reason,
Regulation is toonly
public
Transparency
one decision-making.
element International
to ensure fairadvocates
lobbying. for a three tierofsystem
Enforcement any re
Transparency in lobbyingIntegrity;Equality
strengthens the of legitimacy Recommendations
To ensure
of stakeholders,
a transparent while They
and are
contributing
high relatively
quality
The IIA on the Transparency Register and the 2015 Guidelines assume that t to transparent
better
policy-makinggovernance processand in
public
EU legisla
confid
Lobbyists come in many Integrity;Other forms as diverse as environmental
(please To
Equalitycomplementof NGOs
access the orintegrity
multinational
They are companies.
system and thetran
relatively Expertise
existing Code is provided
of Conduct to policy
for inte
Any attempt to regulate lobbying must address the of:
For
-
Oxfam broader
this
clear issue Transparency
reason,
expectations
is convinced of equality
of
that ofmost
impartiality
the opportunities
International
and
effective, fidelity of
advocates
and to public
ethical, for a
interest;
way three
to stoptier system
privileged
To raise awareness of t Equality
COSLA as the national association of Scottish Local of access To share
TheAuthorities, and
new rules were participate
a public They
originally
body fully are
geared relatively
andtowards inseparablytran making ownedtransparent
by themany fundamen
undue
We see, however, that the misbehaviour of a few -Equality 1. ispractical
a
sufficient
coreofofguidancestrong
to discredit
access regulations,
canon be an strengthened
how entire
to are
dealprofession.
with by: The
and risk
giftstransparent of undue influence and
hospitality,
access, structural imbalances Integrity in resources and the 1. integrity
a core of in strong
interest regulations,They
representation. relatively
A first step to
Ignorance of that by the EU institutions supposes-Integrity: 2.
By an additional
aguidance
approving
breach
doing Asofon
this legal
aArticlelayer
handling
responsible
we have ofbeen
requirements
4 TEU Codes
official
company, ofLisbon
ofunfairly
the Conduct
information,
that allow
we for
andpublic
citizens,
support officials
communication
interest
ethical and
groups
behaviour withand
andthird
corporpart
integri
ilAny
lobbismo
attemptcomnque
to regulate togli Integrity
lobbying must address the They notpenalised
arecivil Treaty
transparent here
whichatandrequires
all our collective
the EU instituti
respon
-3.a broader
arobust
functional,
introducing issue
system strong
a legalofofequalitysphere
conflicts
requirement ofof of
opportunities
interest
on public society ofmonitoring.
management,
bodies access, structural
to publish imbalances
the results of con i
ensuring a level playing field Equalityin theof decision-making
access We
2. anstrongly
process
additional isagree layer that
transparency. achieving
offorCodes
They Lobbying, appropriate
ofrules
are Conduct
relatively and and
the
tran lobbying regulation is not just a
To be absolutely clear COSLA is however more than - periodic
making
Accountability:
It shouldhappy disclosure
open
bethat notedall
We calls
ourthat see of interests,
meetings applications
accountability
the Lobbyingwith EU(Scotland) asregarding
to sit
an on incompatibility
advisory/expert
indispensable
officials, MEPs, Act 2016 element
etc.introduces of
are publicly simultaneo
groups of a and
a mandacomp
known in
Fundierte
Efforts Informationen
to shed transparency Integrity;Other
on lobbying, (please
should In Gem
-take
athis into
rule Artikel
only 11
context,
to consideration EUV
Transparency
meet sol
theThey
registered are
challenges relatively
International
lobbyists, tran a clear
in determining
sees whose
priority interests
in the overhau
are rep
We agree
impact thatonethical
it has and
legislation transparent
and policies, lobbying
should helps
be 3. The
made
a policy
requirement
functional, development
transparent strongto be
so transparent
and
sphere
that is
society
ofnecessary
civil should
at society
large for
not
can a place
thriving
monitoring. an democracy.
unnecessary Public
burden off
Yes, wealready
believe thatstress
ethical Integrity;Equality
and of interest
acc -Recommendations
control of the revolving They
doors aare relatively
between the atran
public and the private sectors, toan
We are
However, we must formally registered
that thetransparent
in the
onus toCommittee
be transparent Equity
It isrepresentation
of ofshould
access:
unfortunate
the Regions that
not We
constitutes
as believe
this
solelyofficial
has that
and
come
lie with vitalin atorder
part
democratically
lobbyists. a time oftoThe achieve
dynamic
when better
EU
accountable
there
lobbying aredecision-making
transparency
strong
representative
community questions
is clearly prpo
Integrity;Equality of ac -To sanctions
complement
Lobbyists
for non-compliance
areofexpected
the integrity They system
topermits
declare are and thetran
relatively
their general
existing Code of Conduct for inte
information such
know who exercises influence and how. Indeed, transparency In this context, Transparency
lobbying International
any stakeholder sees to a in
clearinterest;
priority in as
theorganisa
overhau
Similarly, lobbyists subscribe Integrity;Equality of acc -Recognition
to a code of conduct clear
by expectations
appearing of on
thethe oftransparency
legiti impartiality
They are relatively and fidelity
register tran
and public
are therefore expected to be
Equality
- better of access can be strengthened by:
alsopractical
Integrity;Other guidance on how tobe deal with gifts and hospitality,
society to react to ongoing lobbying with(please their ownWe Transparency
efforts.
- approving
guidance
believe
Transparency
on legal
that
Register
requirements
handling
They
a register
also
to allow
official makesare
forhighly
must
that full
politicians
allow
information,
transpar
truly
structural inclusive
citizens,
and
and
transparency it should
interest groups
communication towith level the
monitor
and who
corpor
third part
p
In contrast, the transparency Otherregisters
(please elaborate
code of conduct does not hold the They unions areofficials
relatively ethical
tran behaviour to the same stand
Oxfam stronglyand
A transparent believes that interest
open dialogue between the EU- institutions
representation introducing
a robust
and lobbying system a legal
and is
alloftherequirement
conflicts
lifeblood
relevant ofon
of interest
stakeholders any public isbodies
democratic
management,
vital for to publish
system
high and thetherefore
quality results
EU ofvital
policy-ma con
aware that the public is watching, Integrity;Equality
and allows of acc
citizens making.
- making to hold
control open
of decision-makers
the all calls forThey
revolving toareaccount.
applications
doors relatively
between tothesittranon advisory/expert
public and the private groups
sectors and in
In
We a fully
democracy,
Preliminary support
remark:the aimsIntegrity;Equality
principle
the Friends of of ofthe
the accountability
European ofCommission
Earth Europe
access
holds
is - periodic
a that togovernment
steering disclosure
increasegroup transparency
member
They are
officialswhether
of interests, from
of ALTER-EU
notits
rules transparent
regarding
elected
conception at10
(www.alter-eu.org)
all yearsby
or incompatibility
appointed those
ago.
and ofco-develope
simultaneo
The whosame hav
Integrity;Equality of access Reasoning
- a rule to only meet They
registered are not
lobbyists, transparent
and at all
Friends of the Earth Europe (FOEE) considers that, Theinfirst general,
question ethical,above andreferred
transparent to ethical lobbying lobbying can helpwhichpolicy
goesdevelopment
further than t
However,
We agree itthat
should be pointed
lobbying Integrity;Equality
can outperhaps
indeed that
helplobbying
of ac
policy which Regulation
-Stopping
development sanctions is
is transparent only
ifforitprivilegedone
non-compliance
is not
istransparent
transparentelement
They
always and tofair
are ensure
relatively
ethical.orThis fair
ethical.
But tran lobbying.
Any from
apart Enforcement
attempt beingto regulate
ethical ofandany
lobbyi re
tra
A more pertinent question would be: what is ethical theand access lobbying?
by business consultation
interests: Lobbyists
focuses representing
on the lobby
Integrity;Other
The Commission's November 2014 transparency Prioritising (please The representativeness,
reforms which the public
prevent They
interest:
commissioners are relatively
Public and and tran
private
senior(business)
officials from interests
meeting canwith con
Interest representation and lobbying is elaborate
a vital partFor of any
this democracy
reason, Transparency
closely relatedInternational
to universal advocates
invalues such
for
far abeyond
as
three
afreedom
Other (please Corporate tier system
of inte
spe
Transparency is only one element, albeit an essential Preventing
one, ofinterests,
unscrupulous
ethical wit No
lobbying. opinion
lobbying:
But ethical
Lobbying lobbying thegoescontext of conflict
transparenof
1. a core of strong regulations,
Other (please elaborate All lobby transparency rules No opinion
must be placed in this wider, ethical context.
Lobbyists come in many forms as diverse as environmental 2. an additional NGOs layer
or multinational
of Codes of Conduct companies. for Expertise
public officialsis provided
and to policy
Integrity;Other (please honesty 3. a functional, strong sphere of They arecivil
notsociety
transparent monitoring.at all
til e
We absolutamente
see, however, thatnethe Integrity;Equality
misbehaviour ofofaac few Diversidade
is sufficient to dediscredit
opinio.an They entire areprofession.
relatively tran The risk of undue influence and
Ethical and transparent Integrity;Equality of acc In Integrity is veryTransparency
this context, very impTheyInternational are relativelysees transparent
a clear priority in the overhau
Any attempt to regulate lobbying Integrity;Equality
must address of accthe broader issue of equality They of opportunities
are relatively of tran access, structural imbalances i
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac Wichtiger als "gleichber They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Oglnie rzecz biorc etyczna i przejrzysta dziaalno Ograniczenie
lobbingowa uprzywilejowanej
pomaga w ksztatowaniu pozycji lobbystw polityki.reprezentujcych
Wanym jest abyinteresy procesyg
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Transparenz
Samo wprowadzenie im Bereich der Interessenvertretung
Integrity
i zreformowanie Rejestru Przejrzystoci schafft mehrUE
Ograniczenie Vertrauen
nietycznego
nie oznacza und
They Rckhalt
are relatively
lobbingu,
jednak, in dziaalno
die transparent
dziaajcego
e w imieniu
lobbingowa toksycznego
w UE bdzie prz
Politik,
Interestindem sie Machtmissbrauch
representation Integrity;Equalityund Korruption
of ac Proved erschwert.
competence Die Nachvollziehbarkeit
andThey ex are relatively von politischen
tran
Entscheidungen
Naley jednak podkreli, und eineIntegrity;Equality
politische
e lobbing,Rechenschaftslegung
ktryofjest
accprzejrzysty,
Zasady etyczne tragen
nie zawsze zu mehr
dla urzdnikw:
jest Vertrauen
They
jednoczenie
areefektywna
not in transparent
politische
etyczny.
regulacja Strukturen
Lobbyci
lobbingumog wymaga
ujawnia niews ty
und ihre Institutionen sowie zu einem hheren Ma von Akzeptanz der Politik bei. Zudem regt Transparenz
Det r viktigt fr besluts Equality of access They are relatively tran
zur Partizipation der Brger an, was nicht nur Brgernhe schafft, indem die Ansichten der Brger Eingang in
die EU-Politik finden, sondern Integrity auch dazu fhrt, dass Other principles, we
Kompromisse suggest,
zwischen They are relatively
would
Ansichten include
gefunden, transparent
openness, accessibility, accounta
akzeptiert
und implementiert werden knnen. Integrity;Equality of access We think that while it is They
necessary are not
to transparent
regulate at
lobbying all activities, legislators s
Lobbying
Dem is a vital
Austausch mitpart Integrity;Equality NGOs
Interessenvertretern, of ac und We anderen
also thinkAkteuren that the responsibility
der They are relatively
Zivilgesellschaft for transparent tran eine
kommt policy making should be e
erhebliche Bedeutung zu, Integrity;Equality
weil mit ihm neue of Aspekte
acc Es Diegehrt
und Ideen
Regulierung zum in Wesen die Interessenvertretung
der Entscheidungsprozesse
ein They are relativelygegenber tran einflieen. den EU-Institutionen so
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Der Verband der Kali- unIntegrity;Other (please Der Verband der Kali- und They Salzindustrie
are relatively sprichttran sich selbstverstndlich dafr
Der Bundesverband der IEntegrity;Other (please Die Regulierung der Int They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Interessenvertretung
Transparent lobbying is helps Integrity;Equality
to ensure democratic of ac Ein Nachweis derprocesses
decision-making Kompete Theythat areare relatively
open totran scrutiny, at all stages of decision
Integrity;Equality of ac Appropriate legislation They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of acc Representativeness and They e are relatively tran
un lobbismo che usa mezz Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
- introducing a legal requirement on public bodies to publish the results of con
- making open all calls for applications to sit on advisory/expert groups and in

Interest representation and lobbying is a vital partReasoning of any democracy closely related to universal values such as freedom of spe
Regulation is only one element to ensure fair lobbying. Enforcement of any re
Lobbyists come in many forms as diverse as environmental Policy makers NGOs have or amultinational
duty to seekcompanies.
out informed Expertise
specialists is provided to policy p
in the respective
It
For is up
this to the
reason, EU institutions
Transparency to make sure
International that the
advocates interest
for a representation
three tier system bec
Interest representation Integrity;Equality of ac Furthermore, legislators should They are seek
relatively
a balance tran between the regulation of lob
We see, however, that the misbehaviour of a few 1. is a
sufficient
core of strong to discredit
regulations,
an entire profession. The risk of undue influence and
Any decision-making proc Equality of access What should be layer done of They
byCodes
the EU areinstitutions
not transparent to public
introduce the right
2. an additional of Conduct for officials and balance is:
Integrity;Equality
Any attempt to regulate lobbying must address the of access- broader
3. To limitissue
a functional, thestrong
number
of equality They
sphere of ofare
of meetings relatively
with
opportunities
civil society transparent
theof business
monitoring. lobbies; imbalances i
access, structural
Integrity;Equality of access -Die Regulierung
To ensure a der They are
rightInteressenvertretung
balance relatively
between transparent
thegegenber
industry and dencivil society represen
EU-Institutionen so
Lobbying plays an importaIntegrity;Equality
Efforts to shed transparency on lobbying, should einenof ac -
In
take The
thisinto European
context,
consideration
offenen, Commission
Transparency
transparenten No opinion
the challenges in particular,
International butaDialog
in determining
und regelmigen sees also
clear the
whose other
priority
der ininstitutions
interests
Organe themitoverhau
are
den m
rep re
Integrity;Equality of acc der Zivilgesellschaft zu untersttzen They are relatively(Artikeltran 11 EUV). Manahmen zur Strku
Integrity;Equality of access Allgemeinen sowie die Beschlsse They are relatively tran
der Europischen Kommission zur Verffe
Le lobbies devono alimen Integrity;Equality of ac Mitgliedern
vedere osservazione der Kommission al No opinionoder Generaldirektoren ber Meetings mit Intere
a transparent lobbying i Equality of access;Othe Folge Equality haben,
Transparency dass
of access die Organe
should
International Nobelieves diesen
opinion Dialog
that vernachlssigen.
full lobbying transparency Denn is dann
the foun k
Die Henkel AG & Co. KGaAIntegrity;Other (please einem
Die transparenten,
Regulierung der offenen und
InteThey are regelmigen
relatively tran Dialog nicht nach. Da die O
We are convinced that the democratic process is Sachverhalte improved by decision regulieren, makers
ist dielistening to those affected
Interessenvertretung undby der policy
Austauschdecision berdu
Furthermore, we are alsoIntegrity;Equality
convinced that most Recommendations
of acdecision
Une parfaite
Transparencymakers transparencThey
is
have
at the
the core are
appropriate
of the relatively
issue.
level The
of tran
integrity
Brussels andenvironment
apply this in
is their
charac sta
Fakten
To in der Praxis
complement the mit Unternehmen und Wirtschaftsverbnden eine fornotwe
We
It is are equally
essential forconvinced Integrity;Equality
the quality that advocacy
of the has
of acc
to be
EU policy-making We
Die done
nonetheless
in
theanEU
Regulierung
that
EU-Regulierung. derintegrity
ethical
welcome
and They system
transparent
reasonable
are
Interessenvertretung
institutions have
and
a relatively
mannerthe
rules
transparent
existing
tran
andand
gegenber
and
Code
regulations
therefore
open
of asConduct
we
dendialogue support
thosewithfunction
EU-Institutionen the
all
inte
re
so
rele
Die Lufthansa Group betIntegrity;Other (please -
LHGclear expectations
spricht sich of impartiality
selbstverstndlich
They are and fidelity
relatively
dafr aus, to
tran public
dass - interest;
basierend auf gemeinsa
Die deutsche Automobilindustrie setzt sich fr einen transparenten,
- practical guidanceregelmigen
on how to deal und praxistauglichen
with gifts and hospitality, Dialog
EK has been
zwischen deninEU-Institutionen
the Transparency
Integrity;Other
undRegister
allen(please
since Der
It
Stakeholdern2008.
is important
VDA
ein.spricht that theselbstverstndlich
Interessenvertretung
sich They are relatively
gegenber dafr tranEU dass
den
- guidance on handling official information, andaus, Institutionen
communication- basierend ist ein
with aufkonstr
third geme
part
Entscheidungen. Integrity;Other (please beschlossenen und realisierten
They are
- a robust system of conflicts of interest management, Pflichten
relatively - alle
tran Stakeholder auch die gleichen
Integrity;Equality of access - periodic disclosure of interests, They arerules relatively
regardingtransparent
incompatibility of simultaneo
Integrity;Equality of access - a rule to only meet registered They are not transparent at all
lobbyists,
Interest representation i Integrity;Equality of ac -Die control
Trustworthiness,
Expertise of thelokaler
revolving unddoors
represeThey between
are
regionaler relatively the tran
public and the private
Gebietskrperschaften und ihrer sectors,
Verbn an
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity;Equality of acc -Es Diesanctions
derzeit
ist wichtig forsicherzustellen,
non-compliance
geltenden Regeln
They unterscheiden
are relatively
dass nicht nurtran aberdenjenigen
von zwischen zwei grundstzlic
partikulare Intere
Lobbying/InteressensverIntegrity;Equality of ac Weiter sollte bercksichtigt They werden,
are relatively
dass Kommunentran sowie ihre Gremien, Ve
Equality of access can be strengthened by:
A mandatory register woul Integrity They are relatively tran
- approving legal requirements that allow citizens, interest groups and corpor
Integrity;Equality of access - introducing a legal requirement They areon relatively
public bodiestran to publish the results of con
See attached written su Equality of access;Othe -Die See attached
making openwritten
Regulierung allder
calls suforThey are relatively
applications
Interessenvertretung to sit tran
on advisory/expert
gegenber groups andso
den EU-Institutionen in
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Interest representation
Die deutsche Wirtschaftand lobbying is a(please
Integrity;Other vital partReasoning
Zu of "Gleichberechtigter
any democracy closely related
Zugang":
They areIm toSinne
universal
relatively tranvalues
einer such as freedom
ausgewogenen Interessensvof spe
Integrity Regulation is only one element They areto relatively
ensure fair lobbying. Enforcement of any re
transparent
Transparency International believes that full lobbying transparency is the foun
Lobbyists
those groupscomemust in many
be regIforms as diverse of
ntegrity;Equality asaccess
environmental NGOs or multinational They are companies.
not transparent Expertise
at all is provided to policy
In general, ethical and transparent lobbying helpsFor To policy
achieve
thisdevelopment
a sound
reason, framework
and it is important
Transparency for relations
International to makewith sure
lobbyists,
advocates that
for the
athe processes
following
three would
tier systemto se
Lobbying has gotten a veEquality of access Recommendations They are highly transpar
We see, however, that the misbehaviour of a few 1. is a
sufficient
core of strong to discredit
regulations,
an entire profession. The risk of undue influence and
Transparent lobbying is about Integrity;Equality
more than just of acthe ToEU's
2.
complement
Availability
Stopping
an lobby the
additional of openthe data
transparency
privilegedintegrity
layer of accessThey system
are
register.
Codes
and
relatively
byConduct
of The
business thetransparent
Commission existingshould
interests:
for
Code of
Lobbyists
public officials
Conduct
extend
andrepresenting
for inte
the wider t
Integrity;Equality of access - clear expectations of impartiality
They and
arecivil fidelity
notsociety
transparent to public interest;
at allstructural imbalances i
Any attempt to regulate lobbying must address the3. broader
a functional, issuestrong
of equality
sphere of ofopportunities ofmonitoring.
access,
However, it should be pointed Other out(please
that lobbying
elaboratewhich-Ethics
practical
is rules guidance
transparent
for those ison inhow
not the
No to deal
always
institutions:
opinion with Itgifts
ethical. andjust
Lobbyists
is not hospitality,
may
aboutmake rules fullfordisclosures
lobbyists,
- guidance on handling official information, and communication with third part
Efforts to shed transparency Integrity;Equality
on lobbying, should
of acc In takethisinto
context,
consideration
Transparency the
Theychallenges
International
are relatively
in determining
sees
tran a clear whose
priority interests
in the overhau
are rep
- a robust system of conflicts of interest management,
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
- periodic disclosure of interests, rules regarding incompatibility of simultaneo
Integrity;Equality of access - a rule to only meet registered They are relatively transparent
lobbyists,
Equality of access - control of the revolving They doorsare relatively
between the transparent
public and the private sectors, an
Integrity;Equality of ac -Diffusionesanctions"istituzionale
for non-compliance They are not transparent at all
Oui, mais il doit absolumNo opinion They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access Equality of access can be strengthened
They are relatively by: transparent
- approving legal requirements that allow citizens, interest groups and corpor
Lobiranje, kot se izvaja Equality of access;Othe Na zakonie naj imajo mo They are relatively transparent
- introducing a legal requirement on public bodies to publish the results of con
Integrity;Equality of access - making open all calls forThey are relatively
applications to sittransparent
on advisory/expert groups and in
Sistem bi bil lahko ureje Integrity;Equality of acc preglednost, The regulation obveanjeThey are not transparent at all focus on the suppo
Public rating of of thelobbying
works and towards
their EUcourse Institutions
of action, should
with effective power on b
etica e trasparenza sonoEquality of access Reasoning They are
An added level of transparency is required beforehand. not transparent at all
Interest
Volkswagenrepresentation
promotes aand tr lobbying is a vital
Integrity;Equality of acpartRegulation
of any democracy
Volkswagen isasonly one
closely
a matter element
of related
Theycourse
areto relatively
ensure
to universal
supports fair lobbying.
tran values
equal such
chances Enforcement
as all
for freedom of any
of spe
stakeholder re
The transparency registeIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Suggestion: Do not allow the vote of citizens to be challenged by particular in
Lobbyists
Ethical andcome in many Integrity;Equality
transparent forms as diverse of asacenvironmental
For this reason, NGOsTransparency
or multinational
They are International
companies.
relatively tran advocates
Expertisefor is aprovided
three tier tosystem
policy
1. a core of strong regulations,
Integrity They are relatively transparent
We see, however, that the misbehaviour of a few 2. is an
sufficient
additional to discredit
layer of an Codesentire ofprofession.
Conduct forThe public
riskofficials
of undue and influence and
Integrity;Equality of access 3. a functional, strong sphere They of arecivil
relatively
societytransparent
monitoring.
En
Anyeffet, dans
attempt toleregulate
cadre dIntegrity;Equality
lobbying must address of accthe Labroader
reprsentativit, la They
issue of equality are relatively of
of opportunities tranaccess, structural imbalances i
Integrity They
In this context, Transparency International sees are relatively transparent
a clear priority in the overhau
Efforts to shed transparency Integrity;Equality
on lobbying, should
of acc take into consideration the Theychallenges
are relatively
in determining
tran whose interests are rep
Das Forum Umwelt und Entwicklung erkennt an, dass die Kommunikation mit einem breiten Spektrum von Gruppen und Orga
Lthique et la transparence des activits de lobbying sont essentielles la confiance des citoyens lgard des responsables
Grundstzlich begren wir, dass dass die EU-Kommission
Derzeit sehen
undwir
dasmit
Europische
Sorge einenParlament
sehr starkimprivilegierten
Bereich Sichtbarmachen
Zugang fr Wirtsch
von L
Cest dans cet esprit que le Groupe Socit Gnrale a rejoint en 2014 les principes de reprsentation responsable dfinis pa
Transparente Lobbyarbeit ist aber noch lange nicht
Aber ethisch
auch einwandfrei,
qualitativand unterscheiden
immer wieder sich
beobachten
die tran
Zugnge wir der
fragwrdige
verschiedenenMethoden Akte
En outre,
Ethical and conformment Integrity;Equality
transparent lobbying does notetof
ces principes ac representativeness
cetteThe
necessarily charte, helpdans
abundant le cadre de
the development
financial They sa
resources are relatively
of politique
policies de reprsentation
of business
that are lobby
balanced groups responsable,
and and SocitpP
representative.
businesses
Derzeit beobachten wir, dass Integrity;Equality
Regelverste of acc
gegenNotre
Dieden
Auch engagement
Regulierung
inhaltlich
Verhaltenskodex derauprs
gibt es They
unserer are
Interessenvertretung highly
des EU-Transparenzregisters
Ansicht transparent
nach gegenber
ein starkes den EU-Institutionen
leider
Ungleichgewicht
kaum geahndet so
zwis
In general though, UNI Europa Equality wishes
of access;Othe
to underline Due thetoimportance
the recognised of transparency
consultation
No opinion and
andurgescollective
the Commission
bargaining rights to extend
in relation
the tr
We believe the opportunity to interact with policy makers and contact MEPs, officials or other staff of the EU institutions is cruc
Die
Diese deutsche
Befragung Wirtschaft
fokussiert Integrity;Other
sich auf das(please Die
Lobbyregister
InsgesamtBDA undspricht
viele sich
mussunserersichselbstverstndlich
They
diefolgenden are relatively
EU unserer dafr
Anmerkungen
Meinung tran
aus,
nach dass
viel -strker
werden basierend
sich auch
gegen aufberm
daraufgeme ko
Equality of access The representativeness, No relevance
opinion and expertise of the stakeholders concern
All these activities have to respect ethical principles and be transparent to guarantee that
are to be taken into account by the European Commission and Parliament. A the public policy adapts to the public
Integrity;Equality of ac PUBBLICIT' attraverso They l' are not transparent at all
coherent policy for open dialogue with the relevant stakeholders depending o
Integrity;Equality of acc Accurate the issue at stake is important are
and updated infT hey relatively tran
for transparency.
A transparent and theopen Integrity;Equality
dialogue pharmaceutical of access
between the EUindustry institutions
Bodies and allinrelevant
representing They are not transparent at all
EFPIA represents innovative operating Europe. Through its direct membership of 33 national as
stakeholders is vital for high Integrity;Equality of access;No
quality EU policy-making. opinion
collective interests of wide economic They are relatively
and societaltransparentrelevance have to be
I fully agree in the concept discussed here, that the ethical and transparent lobbying help policy development, but I think the is
We
EFPIA support
has open
been and
signed traIntegrity;Other
up to the (please
Transparency recognised
Register since as playing
its inception a specific
They in are
2009, role.
relatively
and has tran
provided the necessary informati
-CIP Thelists
registration
its meetingsin thewithTranspaency
leaders of EU Register can't
institutionsThebe optional or voluntary.
inrepresentativeness, relevance and expertise of the stakeholders concern
-itsAllwebsite,
the organisations Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
as well as MUST
it does register,
with otherwise
letters, ormembers
otherthey
areforms cannot
to be
ofdo be allowed
taken
communication.
into account to meet
in by
with
the the MEPs Commission
European nor have anyand kindParliament.
of contact w A
-EFPIA
A MemberGeneral Principles
of the European Integrity;Other
also specify
Parlaiment that
(please
or the EFPIA
European that prizes nottransparency
Comission participate
MUST They the
are
register EU relatively
Transparency
every
coherent policy for open dialogue with the relevant stakeholders depending
tran he
meeting Register
has with shall not beinfluen
potential inclu
o
-CIPThis meeting registration Integrity;Other
has (please Iidentification andthe potent They are of relatively transparent
fully supported the aims of to
theinclude
Europeanan abstract fully
Commission
the ofagree
issue theto meeting,
at with
increase
stake iswith
participation
the
important people who
organised
for transparency. joined groups
the meeting,
Bodies from the
thecivil
representingmain society
subject ta
-transparency
The measures to be
since applied
their Equality
conceptionin the
of access;Othe
event
10 years of non-compliance
ago.So, regulation
collective
The same with
in this
interests
goes theofcode
for area
the
wide They
newhas
of conduct
are
to benefit
economic relatively
(ANNEX
and the tran
equality
societal 9 inrelevance
theof Rules
access ofand
haveProcedure
tothe
be rightino
Integrity;Equality
transparency rules on contacts between Commissioners of access recognised (andas cabinets
playing and They are
a specific role. highly transpar
Industry
director
The feedback
generals)
American based
and
Chamber Integrity;Equality
interest
of representatives
Commerce of acc
to the and According
European its overarching
Union to (AmCham
article aim11tooEU) They is are relatively
a unique tran
organisation representing over 160 c
bring the EU closer to itsIntegrity;Other
citizens. (please They are relatively tran
The issue is to clearly define what is understood by ethical and transparent lobbying and to have a level playing-field for all sta
AmCham EU believes transparency Integrity;Other and(please
ethical behaviour
AmCham benefit EU haspolicy always development,
They
stri are relatively as they tran
ensure proper scrutiny from sta
Integrity;Equality of access They
We would welcome that the Commission, the Council, the Parliament and the Committee of the Regions inter alia use as a ba are relatively tran
Expertise from stakeholdIntegrity;Equality of access Oltre alla trasparenza, lintegrit They aree relatively
la parit di accesso (concetti se non sinoni
tran
Integrity;Equality of access Secondo il Parlamento europeo,
They are Integrit
relatively significa
transparent parit di accesso e di pes
The OECD Guidelines also state usefully as the first of its 10 Principles for Transparency and Integrity in Lobbying: Public offi
Da questo punto di vista, la valorizzazione nel rapporto a livello europeo tra is
No opinion The issue is to clearly d They are relatively tran
Volendo aggiungere ulteriori principi/valori rispetto al tema dei rapporti tra isti
Wintershall is committedIntegrity;Equality of acc Il At Wintershall,
est
Inoltre, important
ai finithatdiwe
de consi They
prendre
garantire laen are
compte
trasparenza relatively
la del tran
reprsentativit
processo des stakeholders.
decisionale, potrebbe
We believe
Gleichberechtigter integrity
Zugang and equality
besteht of access
nicht, wenn are essential
bestimmten principles
Lobbyisten for acr
diritto -costit
Integrity;Equality of ac They are relatively tran z.B.
Il giudizio positivo motivato dalla circostanza che Il principio
il lobbying, di trasparenza,
nellordinamento inoltre,italiano,
potrebbe costituisce
essere esercizio
ulteriormente di unrafforzato da
Z.B. begnstigen in knapp bemessene Konsultationsfristen oder erst spt
Inoltre,
Principles dalofpunto
better vistaIntegrity;Equality
di regulation
pratico le lobby
should ofdaaccess
tradursi
be applicable A
In tal
to fine,
inrecently
theall italiano
si ritiene
stakeholders agreedgruppi
opportuno
that They
di are relatively
pressione
rendere
Inter-Institutional
participate intutte
the transparent
oAgreement
rappresentanti
le informazioni
regulatory di
onprocess.
Bettersull'influenza
interesse
Having the
Law-Making, awhr
delle
live
sam
th
Integrity;Equality of acc They are relatively tran
Gleichberechtigter Zugang beinhaltet auch, dass Partikularinteressenvertrete
Entgegen der in den Medi Integrity;Equality
The OECD lists transparency as one of the central of ac Wichtig
The pillars
above ist u.a.
of sound die Sic
points regulation.
are also They are relatively
highlighted
Businesses in theneedtran
OECDto bereport
able to Lobbyists,
fully understand
Govern
Voll zugestimmt wird, sofern Integrity;Equality
sehr hohe und of effektive
ac Integritt Standards der Ethik, They
und Transparenz are relatively
Transparenz
erfordern es,
und tran
missbrauchsanfllige
diesbezglicher Kontrolle
relevanteverhinde
Vern
Im Einzelnen unter 1.1.c.Integrity;Equality
und 2.2. of ac representativeness: ho They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Die Rechtssubjekte,
Transparenz die dervon They
demokratisch
Gesetzgebung are relatively
darflegitimierten
tranzur Beeintrchtigung
nicht Gremien regiert von werdenBrg(
Integrity;Equality of ac Reciprocity in terms of the They are relatively transparent
way both the European Institutions and lobbyists d
No opinion Proportionality - reportingNo opinion
requirements being upwardly proportionate to the a
Pas de commentaires Integrity;Equality of ac La Accountability - an element of are
reprsentativit et l They relatively tran
accountability should be infused into the report
Un
It islobbying
vital thatthique
not onlyet transparent contribue
Integrity;Equality totalement la bonne laboration
of acc They are desnot politiques.
transparent
No opinion Lgalit daccs des groupes No opinion
Dans l'inconscient collectif, le lobbying auprs des Institutions est bien souvent de peru pression
comme aux une dcideurs est primordiale
limite l'exercice dmocratice q
Aujourdhui largement prIntegrity;Equality of acc Il sagit ainsi de tendre vers They une are highly
administration
transparent dlibrative permettant de
We consider both integrity and equality of access as important principles whic
Le lobbying est aussi l'outil Integrity;Equality
qui doit mieux of access
inspirer Illes
nous Institutions
parait galementeuropennes, They
important are
perueshighly
d'ajouter transparent
par les
: opinions publiques comme lo
Die Transparenz der Gesetzgebung darf nicht, das in Art. 47 Abs. 2 S. 2 verb
Integrity;Equality of access - La gestion
The des conflits dintrt
representativeness, They are relatively
relevance and expertise transparent
of the stakeholders concern
Pour toutes ces raisons, Integrity;Equality
Il nous parait ncessaireof ac Zudem- dencourager
Surveillance du
lintervention
Pantouflage
muss sichergestellt They desare
(Revolving
werden, lobbies
relatively
dassdans door)
klartranla sphre publique
zwischen en encadran
der anwaltlichen Bera
Lobbying has to be doneIntegrity;Equality of ac It is equally important that They positions
are relatively
taken bytran parties involved in lobbying activ
Integrity;Equality of acc They are relatively tran
Il s'agit d'un mcanisme Integrity;Equality of ac l'identification non qui They are relatively tran
Interest representation is considered an integral part of a healthy democratic system[1][2]. In this context, WWF agrees that et
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Other (please The identification
[1] Machiavelli in Brussels: The Art of Lobbying the EU (M. P. C. M. van Schendelen) of confThey are relatively tran
Confindustria
[2]
Eettinen fullyedunvalvonta
ja avoin supp Integrityei kuitenkaan automaattisesti The representativeness,
http://www.transparencyinternational.eu/2016/03/spring-cleaning-time-for-transparent-lobbying/
Yritysmaailman johda lobbareilla They
tasapainoisiin arelopputuloksiin.
on muihin relatively
sidosryhmiintran Allaverrattuna
olevassa ylivertaiset
kohdassa Bresu ma
[3] http://www.integritywatch.eu/ Integrity;Equality of ac WWF wishes to underlineThey are relatively tran
Ptksentekoprosessin
Un dialogue ouvert et transparent Equality
avoimuutta ofentre
access;Othe
on les
syyt list
Ammattiliitoille
institutions niin, deettei
l'UEyksikn
etkuuluu
touteskomission
oikeus
Noparties
les opinion
kyd virkamies
kollektiivisia
prenantes tapaa neuvotteluja.
rekisterimtnt
est essentiel pourSiksi
une lobbaria,
on trkejU
politique
Integrity;Other (please De faon globale, la rep They are
Un dialogue ouvert et transparent entre les institutions de l'UE et toutes les parties prenantes est essentiel pour une politique U relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac De faon globale, la rep They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
The EU therefore has an obligation to ensure that such transparency is achieved, which mandates for full transparency around
To achieve a sound framework for relations with lobbyists, the following would
The International
In general, ethicalStandards
and transparentfor Lobbying
lobbying Regulation
helpsWhilst
policyrecognise
International
development that transparency
Standards forofLobbying
and it is important lobbying to make Regulation
activities
sure thatis emphasise
keythetoprocesses
increasing
the integra
topub
se
Stopping the privileged access by business interests: Lobbyists representing
The Standards
Transparent can beisaccessed
lobbying about more here: http://lobbyingtransparency.net
than just the A.EU's Integrity is a very important
lobby transparency register.element to effective lobbying
The Commission should extendregulation. the widerBoth tl
Stopping lobbying on behalf of 'toxic' industries: An ethical approach to lobby
Geelmuyden
The need forthe Kiese
lobby believes that better
Integrity;Equality
regulation is ever information
more ofpressing
ac The leads
Access thetotocurrent
inInternational better political
information decisions, andleading
is They are to a context
relatively bettertransociety. That is our motivation,
Meanwhile, European Ombudsman has seriously criticised the Standards
Commission also
economic
foroutline
its poor restrictionsin which
implementation around there
ofthe
the ispre-
widespread
World and post
Health
Equality of access Ethics rules for those in the They are relatively
institutions: It is transparent
not just about rules for lobbyists,
We
It is agree
essential withthat
Transparency
diverse International
participation that [l]obbying
in public In
B. addition
decision-making
Equality is toan
of transparency,
integral
access, partunderstood
is guaranteed
as ofintegrity
aso healthy
that and
alldemocracy,
by equality
the
viewpoints of closely
Internationalaccess,
are taken related
we
Standards
intofind totrust
universa
account,
within and
the
he
However, it should be pointed
Other out
(please
that lobbying
elaborate which is transparent is not They
always areethical.
relatively Lobbyists
tran may make full disclosures
Die
We sterreichische
support the joint Indu Integrity
letteroffor a mandatory They are relatively transparent
Lobbying is one method participation butEU lobby
Trust
it needs
Theto register
beatregulated
right all[2]
to stages
co-signed
participate inorder
including
Transparency
should to ensure
be the decision
implemented International
a level makers,
playing
by EUfieldEU.
the interest
Geelmuyden
institutions
for all those representati
to the whoKiese
fulles
wis
Der Verband der Chemisc Integrity;Equality of ac Der VCI spricht sich da They are relatively tran
[1]
Whilst Integrity;Equality
there is no clear definition of ethicaloflobbying
access
http://www.transparencyinternational.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/The-EU-Legislative-Footprint.pdf
Effectiveness:
Guaranteeing
in a general Lobby
equality
sense, They
regulations
ofthere
access areis
are relatively
must
clear work
essential, transparent
effectively
internationalgiven that asin to
standards notthat
previous increase
the
yearsEUthe(20
Co
[2] http://www.transparencyinternational.eu/2015/10/joint-letter-for-a-mandatory-eu-lobby-register/
Integrity;Equality of ac They are relatively tran
In general,means
Lobbying ethicalthat
andstak
transparent lobbying
Integrity;Equality of helps To
Itpolicy
achieve
acfor transparency
isThemostly development
a sound framework
important and
aalso it is important
They for relatively
are relations to make with sure
tran lobbyists,
that thetheprocesses
following would to se
It is important to remember that responsibility C. EU institutions
should be shared
should by ensure
lobbyists that
and records
public are officials,
kept by butthe it isinstitut
public
Integrity;Equality of ac They are relatively tran
Transparent lobbying is about more than just the Stopping EU's lobby the transparency
privileged access register. byThebusiness Commission interests: should
Lobbyists
extend representing
the wider t
It is also important tha Equality of access We fully support full tr They are relatively tran
lobbying
Meanwhile, is never transpaIntegrity
the European Ombudsman has seriously Stopping criticisedlobbying the Commission
on behalf Theyofare for not
'toxic'
its poortransparent
industries: Anatethical
implementation all of
approach
the World to Health
lobby
Integrity They are relatively transparent
However, it should be pointed Integrity;Equality
out that lobbyingof ac which
Ethics is rules
transparent
for those is not
in theNo
always
institutions:
opinion ethical.ItLobbyistsis not justmay about makerules fullfordisclosures
lobbyists,
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac Accountability; MandatorThey are relatively tran
Problematina je meja oz. Equality of access Lobisti so plaani. Kako They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Lobbying can help policy development as it can be a way for policy developers to receive and take account of a wide range of
We suggest that the concept Integrityof transparency should We believe be interpretedequity ofas access Theyisas
widely are relatively
important,
possible totransparent
rather thanthat
ensure equality.
all those Civilinvolved
society in or
EPF is committed to tranIntegrity;Other
Lobbying must also be ethical by which we meanIntegrity (please that bothand lobbyists
equality and They
of policy are
accessmakers relatively
are essential tran
must follow to ensurethe rules
that and
any lobbying
work in an is op
fa
Industry
We would feedback
argue thatbased
theIntegrity;Equality
best way to improve of acpolicy
According
The development
integrity to ofarticle
those 11lobbying
o Theytoare
is, however, and relatively
ensurebeing that tran
lobbied
as wide is equally
a rangeofofvital views importanc
as poss
Integrity;Equality of acc They are relatively tran
Un dilogo abierto y tra No opinion They are relatively tran
Lobbying and interactionIntegrity;Equality of acc Equality of access is cru No opinion
Transparenz und Offenhei Integrity;Other (please Vermittlung von Fachinf They are relatively tran
Stakeholders are an impor Integrity;Equality of ac In The ordercurrent to achieve
systemaalread complete
They are andrelatively
sound regulationtran on lobbying not only tran
Ethical and transparent lobbying regulation is an essential First, lobbying step in should
policybe development
performed accordingly for a number to ofthereasons.
principleFirst, of integrity
politician sin
Stakeholders are an impor Integrity;Equality of ac The current system alread They are relatively tran
A sound and effective lobbying regulation should Then, increase a regulation
the amount about
and athe firmer
qualityethicalof information
and a socially provided
responsible
to the general behaviour pu
Moreover, Ethical and transparent Integrity;Equality
lobbying ofpractices
acc Financing,
Finally,arean i.e. transparlobbying
a synonymous
appropriate ofThey
matured are relatively
regulation
political should tran also
system since balance
they imply the negative
that boths
se
Then,monopolista
the qualitynoof policiesIntegrity;Equality
is strongly related of access
to their
Finally, makingan appropriate isThey
of, since itregulation areof
impossible relatively
transparency
to separate transparent
results
should and not only
processescover lobbiewhen
Lorsquil existe
Transparent un cadr
lobbying Integrity;Equality
activities of ac La in
should be controlled transparence,
order to avoid lintg They are relatively
over-representation tran
of industries and business lobbies th
Integrity;Equality of ac Responsabilidad Social Corporativa They are relatively tran
e Inclusividad, haciendo referencia al co
Integrity;Equality of ac Comunicacin con los grupos They are de inters,
relatively incrementando
transparent as la capacidad de
We agree that EU institutions Integrity;Other
need to meet (please Defesa de
with relevant reputao to
stakeholders e aThey
adopt are sound relatively
decisions. transparent
However, for the lobbying to b
To ensure that the Commission and European Parliament are accountable they must providetran
Integrity;Other (please Einer einseitigen Inform They are relatively more information on the meeting
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
We agree that ethical anEquality of access See comments under 1.1(a No opinion
I cannot
AFA firmlysay that I full
believes Integrity;Equality
that transparent of access
lobbying is a key issue in the EU policy-making They are not transparent
process. Thus, it is of utmost importance t
On this basis, AFA is in favour Integrity;Equality
of a constructive,
of ac openThe role and of transparent
the industry dialogue
They are withrelatively
the EU institutions.
tran
Integrity They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Ethical and transparent lobbying are important to ensure a healthy policy development. For this reason, it is important to devel
Integrity;Equality of access
Die Aufgaben der Handwerkskammer als Krperschaft des ffentlichen Rechts They are sindrelatively transparent
in der Hand-werksordnung (HwO) festgele
Integrity;Equality of
It is also critical for EU decision-makers to ensureIntegrity ac La
Die reconnaissance
Akzeptanz
a balanced and access
Equality des
der Europischen
ofofthein
T hey
access are
different are relatively
Unionbothund
interests tran
der
important damit einhergehenden
to decision-makers.
principles soundpolitis
for aAccording framto
As a global company pres Integrity;Equality of access Codes of conducts should They
alsoare be relatively
developed tranwithin EU institutions which sho
Interessenvertretung
Finally policy development ist ein
Integrity;Other
konstruktiver
can (please
und notwendiger
only be guaranteed Fr
However,eine praxistaugliche
through Beitrag
inthe additionfr eine
developmentto suchAusgestaltung
They
ausgewogene
are
ofcodes, relatively
a culture der
it will und
of be Gesetze
tran
effektive
civil
critical
dialogue istpolitische
to es
at unverzichtbar,
address
all levels Entscheidung
the in theeine
imbalance EU
Other (please elaborate No opinion
Der Bayerische Handwerkstag (BHT) vertritt und Die
frdert
Akzeptanz
als Spitzenorganisation
der EuropischenderUnion
bayerischen
und der Handwerkskammern
damit einhergehenden
und
politis
-ve

Interessenvertretung ist ein Integrity;Other


konstruktiver(please
und notwendiger
Fr eine
Clear praxistaugliche
Beitragand
standards fr eine Ausgestaltung
They
principlesausgewogeneare
on relatively der
how interestundGesetze
tran
effektive istpolitische
es unverzichtbar,
representatives Entscheidung
and policyeine ma
Das ostbayerische Handwe Integrity;Other (please Fr eine praxistauglich They are relatively tran
Ethical and transparent Integrity As a WPP company, the They WPP are Code highlyof Business
transpar Conduct provides the frame
Integrity is the underlying principle that must be the foundation of a framewor
Equality of access La Fdration bancaire franaise They are est trs attache
relatively transparent la libert daccs qui pe
Integrity;Equality of access Die Expertise
Distrust and the lokaler und They
of regionaler are not transparent
Gebietskrperschaften at all factors und ihrer Verbn
Insbesondere
La lgislation doit dieimage
ppige being corrupt
en effetfinanzielle
constamment
are some
Austattung
prendreder
of the
enWirtschaft
considration undthat contribut
ihrer
les Lobb
diffren
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity;Equality of acc Die derzeit geltenden Regeln They unterscheiden
are relatively tran aber zwischen zwei grundstzlic
Die EnBW siehtLobbying
Transparentes einen reIntegrity;Equality
allein sorgt nicht of ac Integrity
zwingend Wichtig
Vonfr
Les
should
ist,
besonderer
eine
diffrents neben also
ausgeglichene derlinked
Wichtigkeit
lgislateurs I They toistaare
und
europens
comprehensive
relatively
reprsentative
der Vereinten
sont amenstran set of sanctions and
Dienstleistungsgewerkschaft
Politikformulierung.
prendre des Die
incentive
Gleichh
dcisions zus
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Allgemein untersttzt dieEquality access;Othe Besides
VereinteofDienstleistungsgewerkschaft integrity, equality
Lintgrit est ladie Wichtigkeit
valeur No ofopinion
centrale
access
von to the policy makers
de Transparenz
lactivit de laund
should be the
die Ausweitung
Fdration bancaireder
backb
Rege
franai
The data of self-reported meetings of the European Commission aggregated
Llaboration des politi Integrity;Equality of acc They are relatively tran
Young people want to hold their elected representative accountable.
We believe in a open di Integrity All affected
Equality parties should
of access need They be appliedare highly in atranspar
pro-active way in order to ensure a
The European Youth Forum Integrity;Equality
believes that, of access
while acknowledging
In order to takethe need to
well-advised They interactare relatively
with all
decisions, transparent
kind
policy-makers of interest need representatives
to be fully-inform in a
Facing
are euroskepticism Integrity;Equality
anddemocratic
defiance that of
regardingaccess;Other
theThis
work (please
proactivity
of its is elabo
byinstitutions,in line No
with
the opinion
the
European European Union Union
should commitment to maintain andan
We convinced that
DIGITALEUROPE the
strongly believes process
an open is improved
and transparent decision
dialogue makers between listening to those
stakeholders andbe
affected EUas by transparent
policy decision
institutions is centra ac
du
Our study on Young people
Integrity;Equality
and democraticof
Furthermore, we are also convinced that most decision acc
life in
This
TheEurope
balanced (2015)
Transparency
Transparency
makers is collection
have shows
Register
at the thecore They
that
of viewstransparency
are
could,
appropriate should
not
in
of the issue. transparent
that
level Thebe of recorded
context,political
of integrity
Brussels be processes
and
used
and made
by
environmentthe publically
isEUa
apply this inistheir key elem
institutio
charac av
sta
CEEP
We are therefore believes
equally convinced Integrity;Equality
that
thatincreasing
advocacy transparency
of ac
has Such
toregistering
beWe done and
consultations
nonethelessensuring scrutiny
should
and They not,
is highly
are
however,
relatively
welcomed question
tran toregulations
narrow
or undermine
thewe gap the
between
role of cit
so
Our commitment to transparency goes beyond The EUin anand
to ethical
institutions welcome
frequently
have transparent
reasonable
updating
made our
a promisemanner
rules toandand
Transparency
by therefore
Register
appropriate as support
those
profile.
means, function
give the
We re
pr
citi
Integrity;Equality of acc They
Ethnical and transparent lobbying is a precondition for the EU institutions to be accountable for its policy making. are relatively tran
We wish to stress that industryIntegrityrepresentations such DIGITALEUROPE
The as
EUDIGITALEUROPE
is responsible has for always
They
play are
a vital
its actions, relatively
role in tran
decisions the and EU decision
policies and making should process be he
We agree
The that ethics
Transparency andIntegrity
Register should apply to all EU Information
institutions, andand documents
it should They are be
include
must highly transparent
astransparent,
one of its features
made public a legislative
and accessible footprin
Each EU institution should Integrity;Equality
treat the Transparency
of acc Register as a databaseThey to systematically
are relativelyand transtructurally identify which civil
Unter einer "ethisch unt Integrity;Equality of acc Integrity Es sollte issichergestellt
the central principle They are underlying
not transparent our charter of responsible lobbying
Integrity;Equality of access Une rglementation forteThey en matire are relatively
de transparent
lobbying nous semble ncessaire. Un
Integrity;Equality of ac Equal autres access to policy-makers is also essential
Le lobbying contribue pos caractres : lhon They are relatively tran to sound public policy decisio
Interest
We fully representation
agree that ethicali Integrity;Equality
and transparentoflobbying
access Cetteis arglementation
Another critical
important element forThey
forte
principle doit
the are relatively
asesound
baserlobbying
fordemocratic sur tran
une analyse
formulation framework dtaille
of sound include des
public diffrea
respectin
policy
Integrity;Equality of acc Within the integrity prin They are relatively transparent
In order
As to develop
an additional a heaIntegrity;Equality
statement, we would add of acctheElle
that Lastly,doitensuring
Generally
It overall
is important
tre
there
goal la
ofplus
should
our prcise
an appropriate be
lobbying They possible
isareto au aniveau
relatively
governance
make andde
tran
constructive la dfinition
control contribution
of
onlobbying
des to notions.
activities
the poli
La transparence nous semble absolumentofindispensable
Integrity;Equality ac Ensuringpour lethat
bonthere are
fonctionnement
They
clear
are
and duenforceable
relatively processus
tran
rules
de prise ethical
de dcisionconduct dmo fo
an easy access to documents and
Elle doit ds lors aussi faire la distinction entre les principes et les pratiques d information, as provided for in th
The involvement Integrity;Equality
of stakeholders of access They are relatively transparent
L'engagement pour un caractre in the decision-making
(plus) thique peut Finally,
First of process
in lobbyists
al orderpermettre
gleichberechtigter
Pour accentuer
galement (so-called
to promote
should
Zugang:
laspect lobbying)
equality
not
dmocratique
des of
is access
be privileged
volutions an integral
in itaccession
depositives,
lUnion iseuropenne,
part
also
comme of
important
any healthy
tolethe thatconsidr
officials
nous
montre democra
leallcode
relev
or to d
Integrity;Equality of ac Derzeit sehen
Proposition
Comme l'indique wir
n1l'Art.mit
: CrerSorge They
152un duoutil are
einen
TFUE, relatively
sehr stark
pourlefaciliter tran
dialogue privilegierten
linformation
social est un Zugang
complte fr
objectifet Wirtsch
pourcontr l'U
Lobbying
LobbyControl is a totally
Ces politiques erkennt demEquality
an, dass die
et rglementations ofdoivent
access;Othe
Kommunikation
finalement Another
Nousmit einem pointbreiten
suggrons
permettre is
delinked toThey
laSpektrum
mettre theplace
Commission
en money
are relatively
invested
vonl'quilibre
Gruppen
europenne tran
und
en inmatire
delobbying. deAs
Organisationen
mettre longinaseiner
disposition
reprsentation the unlobb
Dem
out
des
Integrity;Other (please 1. Aber
La auch qualitativ
ausreichende
Pourront
ngociation fachliche
eux-mmes
collective unterscheiden
QThey
mesurer
est un are les
droitsich
highly de die
ratios Zugnge
transparent
des
premire catgoriesder verschiedenen
importance, dorganisations
reconnu par Aktequ
le
Seit ihrer Grndung
La promotion setztIntegrity;Equality
d'un caractre sichplus
die thique
Organisation
et ac LobbyControl
2. et galement
of transparent du lobbyingfr dasfixer Sichtbarmachen
ne des
peut objectifs
They que are de von
partiellement
relatively Lobbyarbeit
reprsentativit
trantre ralis in einem
(par unLobbyregister
exemple,
par 50%de
registre das tr
Equality of access as meEquality of access Auch inhaltlich haben wir No immer opinion wieder den Eindruck, das ffentliche Interess
Not just equakity of access but inclusiveness - everyone shall have a say : pe
Transparente Lobbyarbeit ist aber noch lange nicht
ethisch einwandfrei,
Proposition immer wieder beobachten wirdefragwrdige Methoden
Integrity;Equality of acc Involvement - n2
every : Recenser
interestThey et hberger
representative
are relatively les prises
should
tran be position about
informed des organisa
and inv
Insgesamt
Une section
Integrity on muss
du
the partsich
registre of die de
both EU unserer
transparence
lobbyists Meinung
and devrait nach
runir
decision-makers viel strker
dans is un gegen
seul
essential. berm
et mmeThis w
La seulebeobachten
Derzeit question est dedass
wir, Integrity;Equality
Regelverste of acc
gegen Il faut
den des sanctions rad TheyEU-Transparenzregisters
Verhaltenskodex are not transparent
Cela aura pour avantagedes dajouter de la transparence et leider kaum geahndet
de lexhaustivit dan
Lobbying should not be tIntegrity;Equality of ac It also important
Integritt: Es muss that mehrp They are relatively einetran
As mentioned above, the passieren,
threat of a um conflict ofweit entwickelte
interest, including Form thevon publicLobb p
Transparency
Fr uns ist dasisLobbyregister
importanIntegrity;Other (pleaseAspekt
ein wesentlicher Policy makingn3
transparenter
Proposition should : und besauberer
Imposer They la are relatively
Lobbyarbeit.
dclaration destranactivits
Dennoch: Hierzu gehren
connexes des sous-tr vie
Integrity;Equality of acc Auch Nous fragwrdige
Equality estimons
of access queLobbypraktiken
islesalso No a key opinion
organisations wiemembres
factor verdeckte
that should duLobbyarbeit
registre
be ensured demssen
transparence
throughout strkerthed
Linitiative du registre Integrity;Equality of ac Ces activits devraient tre
They inscrites
The Greens/EFA group believes that ethical and transparent lobbying is essential for good policy development. However, we aare relatively
au registre
tran de transparence de lUnion e
Integrity;Equality of acc However, in addition to this, They independence
are relatively in tranthe way decisions are taken is a
Comments or suggestions 1.2 The
(Optional)
Transparency Re
Comments or suggestions 2.1 Activities
(Optional)covered
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Disagree
COMITOLOGY PROCESS Very useful Fully agree
It is the old adage of " Very useful Ideally, such a register Partially agree
Diffrence entre Commiss Somewhat useful utile s'il est rellement Partially agree
El Reglamento 1049/2001 Not useful at all En mi opinin, la inscri Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
Huge difference betweenSomewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
I never hear anything abSomewhat useful Fully agree
Ever thought about crea Somewhat useful Since it does not apply toPartially agree
Realment me resulta difNo opinion Desconozco tal registro Partially agree
The European Insittutions Not useful at all It does not show how oftDisagree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
EU institutions are tod Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful The important stuff isn't Fully agree
i just remember the TTIPVery useful Fully agree
Exemples: TAFTA, CETA, Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially
1. A different challenge, aside fromagree
the Transparency Register, is the amount
latively transparent Somewhat useful 2. The public-private sponsored
Fully agree
thinktanks should also be able to be publicly
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Also minutes of meeting Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
Large businesses with imVery useful The register is a first s Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
Elles le sont pour les pe Somewhat useful Il serait plus utilies si Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
It should be more acces Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Partially agree
Transparent in principle, Very useful Useful, but heavily depe Partially agree
la commission europenne Very useful plus de la moiti ne sontFully agree
The institutions are far Very useful An easily searchable data Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful hier sollten mehr Detai Fully agree
Des comptes rendus devra Not useful at all Les registres de transpa Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Should be mandatory Partially agree
Access to material is oft Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Utiles condition qu'il reDisagree
latively transparent Somewhat
For the "normal" civilian the Europeanuseful
institutions are not transparent at all.Fully
Theagree
same goed for the processes and the reasons
Very useful Fully agree
because of the lack of c Somewhat useful As it is said in the sen Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
I don't have enough info Very useful I would say this is the f No opinion
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
Laisser des grandes entre Very useful Il faut saluer cette initi No opinion
Laisser des grandes entre Very useful Il faut saluer cette initi No opinion
ot transparent at all Very useful mais insuffisant sur les Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Pourquoi les lobby ont i Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
For exemple, negociations Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Partially agree
It is often not clear who Somewhat useful It is one-sided. It is a to Partially agree
The use of expert groupsVery useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
In recent years, transpa Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
Organise public hearingsNot useful at all I consider that in its c No opinion
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
More should be done to rSomewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
Anche in questo caso l'i Not useful at all Ancora una volta una doma Disagree
The E Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful A pre and post-employme Partially agree
la transparence doit g Very useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
Me preocupa mucho la op Somewhat useful En la realidad,los ciud No opinion
Comitology excepted, whe Very useful The register could well Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
Plus d'information par t Very useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful It would be much more uFully agree
latively transparent Very useful Disagree
Ok pour le Parlement et Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
Se necesita una mayor inSomewhat useful Sera importante un reg Fully agree
It is not always a quest Somewhat useful See comment above. Fully agree
negotiations with member Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
Some changes in projects Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Mais il faut aller encore Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Em Portugal, a transparVery useful Deveria ser obrigatrio! Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
L'EUROGROUPE, LA B Somewhat useful MAIS DOIT ETRE SER Disagree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Certainement utile cond Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
devraient tre troiteme No opinion Tout dpend de l'usage qu Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful A register as such doesnPartially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
Muss in jedem Falle ver Very useful Fully agree
They are transparent if Somewhat useful Of course it's better to Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
UTILIZZANO MODELLI Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful mais insuffisant Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Disagree
Transparentes pour ceuxVery useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
there is a huge differenc Very useful good tool to learn more aFully agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
i dont have a precise opiNot useful at all Who will be keeping theseNo opinion
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
Le registre de transpare Somewhat useful Disagree
latively transparent Somewhat useful eher mig ntzlich; s. Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
Heel weinig transparanti Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful No opinion
latively transparent Somewhat useful It must be mandatory/exhaFully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Il registro andrebbe sot Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Die Transparenz der euroSomewhat useful in der derzeitigen Ausg Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Partially agree
In comparison to nationaSomewhat useful Strict and transparence ePartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
it is difficult to find a Very useful officials have the chanc Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
Sometimes important issu Somewhat useful Most people is not even Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
We would like to again uVery useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Disagree
Probably somewhat transp Somewhat useful Ways around it for lobbyis Partially agree
It would be desirable if Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Disagree
latively transparent Somewhat useful No opinion
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful No opinion
latively transparent Not useful at all I repeat this earlier poi Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful No opinion
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful No opinion
The problem we have is its extremely difficult to find information as there appears to be some much clutter in the reports, many
If this was streamlined it Somewhat
would makeuseful
search's much
Thiseasier
register
andisidentify
useful, who
Nowas
opinion
doing what.
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
S'il est vrai qu'en compaSomewhat useful Disagree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Disagree
Les travaux des comitsSomewhat useful L'inscription celui-ci Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Informationen liegen sehSomewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
For the public in genera Somewhat useful Who many people know Partially
th agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
The EP is quite transpar Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Disagree
publishing some informatNot useful at all Looking up Monsanto, I fFully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
Anyone can look up the dSomewhat useful It's a good start, but it Disagree
Der er mange mder, forsl Somewhat useful Regisret er kun et af fle Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Hier gibt es natrlich g Somewhat useful Partially agree
While we appreciate thatVery useful Partially agree
latively transparent No opinion No opinion
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Encore
the TR is definitely a veryFully
faut-il que cela s agree
useful tool and easy to use tool without which there
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree have signed up to the voluntary Tra
Not all major interest representatives
latively transparent Somewhat useful The quality of the informationagree
Partially in the Register has not yet been guarantee
the parliament is often Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
full transparency should Somewhat useful only useful if the mandatFully agree
En matire de politique bVery useful Mais un registre ne suffitPartially agree
Elles sont transparentes Very useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
It has been proven that Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Debera ser obligatorio Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Sehr groe UnterschiedeVery useful Fully agree
[FR] Mme si certaines iVery useful Very useful, essential fo Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Disagree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent No opinion No opinion
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Disagree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Es til pero se necesita Partially agree
Mostly the vulnerability Very useful It gives a level playing Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
It is well-known that manNot useful at all The democratic ideologyPartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
The transparency of EU S i omewhat useful The Transparency Registe Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
The institutions have n Not useful at all Really? You think that Partially agree
Il manque encore beaucoSomewhat useful Charte Ethique + Carte Disagree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Yes, but it should be ma Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
Il y a un manque de tra Very useful Fully agree
TTIP Somewhat useful No opinion
Vous devez travailler vo Somewhat useful Le lobbying devrait demaDisagree
Decisions in EU are subjVery useful Provided that shall be t Fully agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Partially agree
See TTIP- a deal almost Very useful Necessary so we know wh Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Variable selon les DG, leSomewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
Lot of public information Very useful Public info about who coFully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Not useful at all Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Ainsi, Le citoyen europ Fully agree
Une meilleure informatioVery useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
I commend the institutio Somewhat useful I am sceptical as to the Fully agree
Newsfeed should be more Not useful at all Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful who in practice monitors Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
I would say that the inst Somewhat useful I have no concert suggesFully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful How can this data be tran Fully agree
No existe real influn Somewhat useful Actividades de lobbies No opinion
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
The Commission must publ Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
Do you know that in Ital Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Utile dans le principe maPartially agree
Je pense que de nombreux Somewhat useful Il serait plus utile si l Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Disagree
I have been working withVery useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Ein Transparenzregister Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
A citizen should have theVery useful The Transparency Registe Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful the Register should be mFully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
More can always be done Somewhat useful All EU officials must en Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Importance de la communic Fully agree
Transparency relates to aSomewhat useful Fully agree
Decisions seem to be mad Very useful Partially agree
le decisioni vengono sempSomewhat useful sarebbe molto utile se s Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Mais insuffisant Fully agree
Tout est effectivement acNot useful at all s'il ne fait pas l'objet d Disagree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
Granted, the above is myVery useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful It is somewhat useful becFully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Not useful at all As the registry is not manDisagree
latively transparent Verytransaprent
European Parliament: highly useful Das Register ist nur dan Fully agree
European Commssion and Somewhat
Council, useful
and other institutions:
need more relatively
rules and cont
Fully agree
Transparecny can only be Somewhat useful See 1.1 c) above Fully agree
The EU treats democracyNo opinion Disagree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
ESPECIALLY NON-INSTSomewhat useful ACTUALLY, LOBBYING Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Saying something existsPartially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Disagree
It is now known that mai Not useful at all We should not try to makDisagree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
the biggest argument forVery useful No opinion
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
They are somewhat transp Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful It's very useful, it is j Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Partially agree
The EU institutions are nNot useful at all Is it public? Are minute Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
I dought a mojority of EUVery useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all No opinion Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Die Antwort ist eine Me Very useful Ja, ja, ja! Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful The Transparency Registe Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Should be more scope for Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Disagree
No opinion No opinion
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful If it works well enough, Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
This questionnaire and t Somewhat useful No ordinary citizen will Partially agree
I don't think the Europ Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
I think the EU does a betVery useful Fully agree
Citizens feel like there Very useful Partially agree
Very useful Fully agree
While a lot of the staff Somewhat useful It can be a help but clea Partially agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all even if normal citizens Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Disagree
Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Trasparancy is diminisheSomewhat useful The Transparancy Registe Partially agree
There is a lot of documenNo opinion It's useful in regulating Fully agree
Since the council negotiaSomewhat useful Nice but not enough Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
This is mainly caused byVery useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful No opinion
I think the best example Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
Ik heb niet genoeg kenniSomewhat useful Het is een mooi concept,Fully agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Disagree
ot transparentSome
at all EU institutions (e.g.
Somewhat useful It is a step in the right
the European Parliament) are exemplary in theirPartially agree efforts and most are at least accepta
transparency
ot transparent at all Very useful No opinion
My special criticism goesVery
towards
useful
the European Commission for often selectively
Fully agree
releasing only flattering information about its
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
Unsure, EU seems very p Very useful Transparency is absoluteFully agree
siehe geheime Verhandl Not useful at all Nur weil ich Einsicht habNo opinion
Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful I have not heard of this No opinion
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent No opinion Fully agree
How come I have no acce Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Not useful at all No single individual, co No opinion
ot transparent at all Very useful Partially agree
and highly inefficient. Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
It must be possible for a Not useful at all It is only a listing of pe Disagree
It's hard to tell. One ca Not useful at all It's not enough. It can b Partially agree
latively transparent No opinion Partially agree
See TTIP. ALL Policy-maVery useful It's a good idea? But yo Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
If true transparency is Not useful at all No withouth a mechanism Disagree
In the case of the trans Somewhat useful Fully agree
Kafka Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful No opinion
The comitology kind-of prSomewhat useful Due to the complicated na Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
Op een of andere manierSomewhat useful Ik kan zien wie en wat, mFully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
Somewhat useful No opinion
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
They are structurally tra Somewhat useful It sounds reasonable butPartially
I agree
Although there is some tSomewhat useful It helps to know what ha Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
TIPP, need i say more? Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
Awfully non-transparent Somewhat useful It's only as useful as it Partially agree
Transparency is more than Somewhat useful A register is a useful too Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful In my opinion, it would Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
Most of them seem to beSomewhat
r useful In its current state the Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
While technically they're Very useful Perhaps make it more clea Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
The cmmunication of the European Union towards its citizens is lackluster. Very little is invested in getting the messages of the
Verhltnismig transpaVery useful Fully agree
ot transparentTo at me
all personally, I think Very useful
this is due to the lack of democracit decision-making No opinion
within the EU. Much has been said on this issue
Os programas educaciona Very useful Excelente. Fully agree
It cannot come as a surprise Somewhat
that people
usefulthink theAsEuropean
above. Institutions are
Partially
not tranparent.
agree This 'transparant lobbying' is not go
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
No opinion No opinion
The whole "TTIP fiasco" V hery useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
all work inside EU shoul Very useful Disagree
I should point out that t Very useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
Many are not aware of thVery useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
Somewhat useful No opinion
TTIP is a very good exam Not useful at all This solution is only use Fully agree
They are somewhat transp Very useful This Transparency RegistFully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Disagree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful All data should be publicFully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
Particularly the Council Somewhat useful Its use for regulating is No opinion
The European institutions Somewhat useful Fully agree
The level of transparencyVery useful Partially agree
Il est difficile d'avoir Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Transparency comes from Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
We can find almost everyVery useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Disagree
They express an opinionSomewhat useful If the register includes No opinion
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
Also each country qualit Somewhat useful The register isn't enoughNo opinion
It is important you hear it from my point of view and
It isthat
important
is of a Peruvian
you hear Citizen
it from my
whopoint
lovesofhis
viewcountry
and that
deeply
is of and
a Peruvian
is extremely
Citiz

I am no magician nor a fortune teller but I can already


I am no
tell magician
that your nor
findings
a fortune
on this
teller
process
but I can
will come
already
totell
showthatthat
your
the
findings
process
o

I can already tell by the articles the JNE are putting


I can
outalready
but the tell
mostbygrieving
the articles
feeling
the is
JNEthatare
this
putting
will come
out but
to light
the most
too late
grieving
and w

BUT I will talk on behalf of the people who are showing BUT I will theirtalk
outrage
on behalf
due of to the
this people
decision. whoThearefact
showing
is that their
throughout
outragethis
dueLEGA
to th
High access to documents Very useful More debate on what lobby Fully agree
And that is the very thingVery
latively transparent is in useful
question NOW andAnd I think
thatyouis the
shouldverytake
thingunder
is in question
Partiallygreat
agreeconsideration
NOW and Ithe think
following:
you should take und
WHY did they (JNE) act the
latively transparent Veryway they did, I am sure
useful WHY thedid actions
they (JNE)
that putactTODOS
the
Fullyway POR
they EL
agree did,PERU
I am sureout the
of campaign
actions thatwere
putlong
TOD b
WHY
I havedid it happen
found at that
it incredib Notspecific
usefulmoment,
at all please
WHY take
I fail todid
asee
look
it happen
at the
what at
polls
those that
No historical
specific
opinionmoment,
data for the
please
last take
90 days
a lookandatyoull
the polls
see th
hi
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Transparency is importanPartially agree
Please also focus on the WHO, who actually shared Pleaselightalso
on thefocuserror
onmade
the WHO, by thewho
political
actually
party
shared
whichlight
greatly
on the
benefit
errorthe
made
otheb
There exists a quartier Somewhat useful I'm not aware of its exis Partially agree
Zum Beispiel
But most zum TTIP
Importantly VVeryquestion
please useful the WHY this Wenn
ButJNE mostes fr
officialjeden
Importantly eine
did not PFully
please
show agree
more
question
leniency
the WHY
towards
this the
JNEdemocratic
official didprocess
not show by
latively transparent
And that for some reasonVery the useful
JNE judgments is more
And that forgiven
for someand Ireason
am sureFully agree
theshe
JNEwilljudgments
be allow toiscontinue.
more forgiven and I am sure
I pray you can read this message
Very useful and can notice Ihowprayforyou mecan andread
those
thiswho
message
FullyI share
agreeand
the can
same notice
concern
how there
for meis and
clearly
those
a case
who f
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
exemple les perturbateurSomewhat useful mais pas suffisant un tr Fully agree
The decision making at tVery useful Disagree
Good to see so many conta Very useful Only if it organised with Fully agree
The secret TTIP negotiatio Very useful It is very useful in prin Disagree
Eher wenig transparent. Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
Ik heb me daar als particSomewhat useful Ik vraag me af of de gemPartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
The EU has rules guidingVery useful Very useful IF it
Ich fordere ein vollstndigesmeets Partially agree
verpflichtendes Transparentes, ffentliches Lob
ot transparent at all Very useful mit folgenden Eintrgen Fully Nameagree von Unternehmen und Gesprchspartner Dat
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
The EU Commission hasVery do useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Be honest. TTIp is claimed Fullyby agree
the EU as the most open trade negotiations ev
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful If the EU is not honest inPartially its reporting,
agreewhy should I trust a register?
ot transparent at all Very useful Aber nur, wenn alle Per Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Without feedback on the Fully c agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Not all meetings and peop Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful se diventa obbligatorio dDisagree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Confidence of current tr Somewhat useful independent policing andFully agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all It is not useful if it's exi Fully agree
Define "opposite of tran Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
European institutions onlVery useful Not only that should be Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
Democratic process is hiNot useful at all Legislation is in the int Disagree
latively transparent Not useful at all Partially agree
Het is reeds bekend dat Very useful Hier moet ook instaan w Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Even when transparent ISomewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
These tools should be designed to reach the public. It may sound silly but if t

It would perfect for the public for instance, if there was an indicator for lobbies
latively transparent
EU wide data and informationSomewhat useful
platforms need more centralisation on a single Partially agree
medium. More efforts should be put in communic
A whole campaign towards Somewhat
the publicuseful
on data accessibility
Additionally
The main is much
the transparency
problem needed. Disagree
with the register would
transparency benefit
register fromthere
is that beingisintegrated wita
no thematic
European Citizen never kSomewhat useful Some may consider this Disagree unnecessary and not costeffective, but this is called
In groen
There is a Teilen
lack ofarbeite Somewhat
adequate publicityuseful Das
in all member TransparenzregisterPartially agree
states.
latively transparent Somewhat useful Somewhat
All formal and informal Institutions must use TR point from which useful
allbecause Fully
interestedi parts
agreecan have access and express their opinio
Additionally all conversations,
Very useful
meetings, etc held In
byfact
EU itformal
must and
be the
informal
o Disagree
Institutions must be public followed.
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Extensive decision maki Very useful Fully agree
except treating TIP Somewhat useful more burocracy less trans Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Dziaania instytucji UE Very useful Partially agree
Gerade in kritischen Pu Somewhat useful Die weitaus meisten EU Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Molto utile se si delinea Fully agree
There is room for improvSomewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
Bei der Verhltnismig Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
latively transparent
Just who exactly is goingSomewhat useful meeting?
to the Bilderberg Fully agree
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-33067655
Not useful at all Open-source is the only Disagree
latively transparent No opinion No opinion
Brger in tgliche Arbe Very useful Fully agree
The EU gives the impressi Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful No opinion
Publish agendas of polit Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
NGO corporate models and conflicts of influence
latively transparent No opinion The basis of a conflict of Partially agree to be broadened. As it is now, the gen
interest needs
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
But NGOs sell their access and influence to foundations, trusts and large fun
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Any approach
Ideally, of be
it should politiciaNo
agreed uponopinion
that all actors involved in public debates hav
latively transparent Not useful at all Action point: Either allowDisagree
all actors to fully engage in the process (regardless
Uwaam, e instytucje eSomewhat useful Rejestr moe sta si baFully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
Example: TTIP. Horrifyin Very useful Fully agree
La Commission europenn Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful But should be more useful Fully agree
The European Commission Somewhat useful Fully agree
Relative means "a bit butVery useful It is a great first step. Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
Broadcast the European Somewhat useful Provide the public with f Partially agree
Somewhat useful Disagree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Auch hier wird auf den Disagree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
Bei beispielswiese d Somewhat useful In den EU-Vertrgen ist Partially agree
Don't really care as we wNot useful at all Pretty much anything prop Disagree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent
Actuellement c'est l'opacit Very la useful
plus complte vu l'absence de publicit desFully agree servant aux prises de dcisions.
documents
La deuxime source d'opacit Very useful
est l'imprcision des Trsrencontres
utile si les
entre
personn
les partenaires
Partially agree(agendas).
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful But it depends on the usPartially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful In order to be very usef Fully agree
latively transparent Not useful at all Impossibile verificare co Partially agree
On this
nous I don't avons
citoyens know eno Somewhatde
la perception useful I don't
fonctionnaires know enough
glandeurs, qui ontabou
unFsalire
ully agree
indcent des des avantages inacceptables, sa
nous avons aussi l'impression Somewhat que leuseful
bon sens de certaines dcisions est Partially absolument agree
absent, preuve de pression de lobbys
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
En ocasiones
The no sehave
EU institutions trataVery useful some important transparency measures
introduced Fully agree transparency varies between them. The
although
as above No opinion No opinion
ot transparentLobby
at all register: As mentioned elsewhere there should be a legally-binding No
Very useful register,
opinionwith comprehensive disclosure requiremen
ot transparentThe
at all Very useful Fully agree
EU institutions have introduced some important transparency measures when compared to some Member States, althoug
Proactive meetings transparency:
latively transparent No opinion All EU institutions
Theshould
idea ofonly
a lobby
meetregister
withPartially
registered
as a tool lobbyists,
to bring transparency
agree lists of meetings to EU
should
lobbying
be pro
is
exemple : les ngociatio
Lobby register: Very useful
As mentioned elsewhere there should be a legally-binding Fully agree
register, with comprehensive disclosure requiremen
Trilogues: These informal inter-institutional meetings A lobby
between
register
thewhich
Europeanis noParliament,
longer voluntary,
the Council
but whichof theis European
backed by Union
the forcean
Somewhat useful Wenn sich abzeichnet, da Fully agree
ot transparentProactive
at all to meetings
Access documents:transparency:
Somewhat
Reforms to All EUthe
institutions
useful
bring Access The
Asto should
apresent
result,only
Documentsaregister
meet is
with
commitment highly-flawed
regulation registered
Partially lobbyists,
and
startagree
to1049/2001 serious
linealists
negotiating
into changes
with ofthe
meetings
legally-binding mustof
Treaty should
result
lobby
Lisbonfrom
bebypro
register th
w
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
Trilogues:
European These informalSomewhat
Allinter-institutional meetings
A
In lobby
between
register
thetransparency
which
Europeanis Fully
anolegally-binding
Parliament,
longer
agreevoluntary,
bethe Council
butregister
which
of theis
is European
backed by Union
the force
an
Ombudsman: European useful
Ombudsman the
decisions
meantime,on before should binding
lobby for EU institutions.
introduced, it will b
latively transparent Very useful
Access to documents: Reforms to bring the Access Asto a result,
Documentsa commitment Partially
regulationto1049/2001 agree
start negotiating
into linea with
legally-binding
the Treaty of lobby
Lisbon
register
by w
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
Wnschenswert
European wre hier
Ombudsman: Very useful Ombudsman
All European Das
In theTransparenzregister
decisions
meantime, before Fully
on transparency agree be binding
a legally-binding
should lobby register
for EU institutions.
is introduced, it will b
Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
As noted in the EuropeanVery useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Soweit es auf StakeholdePartially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Soweit es auf StakeholdePartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
I am informed by an MEPVery useful Provided it is properly m Partially agree
I worked as an 'expert e Somewhat useful Since the grain size is quPartially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
The European Council isVery useful Fully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
they are relatively trans Very useful Thetransparency
Transparencymeasures.
Register Fully agree
isHowever,
a criticalthere
step in
The EU institutions have introduced some important is the
much regulation
that could of be
lobbying.
improved Suffa
latively transparent Somewhat useful It is difficult to compa Partially agree
The
Lobby quality
Zur Strkung of der
register: transparen Very useful
AsTransparenz
mentioned elsewhere The Register,
there should
und der Verlsslichkeit be
deraDaten inimitsTransparenzregister
current
legally-binding Partially
format,agree
register is not
with sufficient.
comprehensive
sollten It needs
die EU- to include
disclosure
Institutionen einregular
requirement
integr
latively transparent Somewhat useful Die Vergleichbarkeit der Partially Daten imagree
Register sollte dringend gestrkt werden. D
They
Es ist are
Proactive sehrfar, fardass
meetings
gut, more t Very
transparency:
die useful
All EU institutions
EU-Institutionen viele ihrer should only meet
UmArbeitsunterlagen
Transparenz with Partially
zu strken,registered
ffentlich agree
sollten lobbyists
zugnglich (or those who fall under
Nichtregierungsorganisationen
machen und politische the thre
Beratungen
verpflicht
Somewhat useful Fully agree
Tobacco lobby: All EU
Finding information in ainstitutions
rNot usefulsigned
at all up to theALTER-EU
If World
I couldHealthhas
find it Organisation's
Ilong-supported
would f Fully agreeFramework
the idea ofConvention
a lobby registeron Tobacco
as a tool Control
to bring sht
Er
In bestaat
groen geen
Teilen verplic
arbeiten Somewhat
dieany useful
europischen Er wordt waarschijnlijk, Fully agree
They
Access aretonot transparent
documents: in
ALTER EU welcomesInstitutionen
way: Das
reforms Transparenzregister
transparent.
For ALTER-EU,
to bring regulation In einzelnen
a lobby kann ein
1049/2001
register Fllen
ntzliches
which
into isjedoch,
linenowithInstrument
longerwievoluntary,
the z.B. den
Treaty zur
of Regulierung
Lisbon
but which is der
by widenbac
latively transparent
-Kriterien zur Auswertung
at functionaries Very
level - DGs useful
von ffentlichen Konsultationen,
jedoch sichergestellt
Trilogverhandlungen Fully dass
werden, agree
und beidieder
in den
Auswahl
Vertrgen
von Mitgliedern
verankerte von Offenheit
Exper
-Trilogues:
at CommissionThese level Somewhat
- politicians
informal useful
- as well as
inter-institutional at EU
meetings
As a Parliament
between
result, wethelevel
wish
European
to seePartially agree thetoCouncil
Parliament,
a commitment start negotiating
of the European
a legally-bindin
Union an
- at member States levelSomewhat in their influencing
useful EU policies
Open access to meetingsPartially agree
latively transparent
TTIP: The European Commission Very usefulshould follow the In the
European
meantime, before Disagree
Ombudsmans a legally-binding
recommendations lobbyand register
provide
is introduced,
full transparency
it will b
Somewhat useful Fully agree
EU.n toimielimet ovat avVery useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Transparency in the mostNot useful at all Disagree
A certain degree of confidentiality is inevitable and essential to any political process that is based on negotiation between diffe
latively transparent Not useful at all Grundstzlich halten wir Fully agree
das EU-Transparenzregister fr ein eher ntzliches I
Europische Behrden ag
Somewhat useful
Whether it be discussions in Coreper at Ambassadorial In der aktuellen
The Transparency Form
level on a Council sind
Register Partially
allerdings
General agreegroe
is an appropriate europische
Approach; meetings
minimumbetween Interessenvertreter
tool for the oversightag
rapporteurs o
Die Kommunen begren Somewhat
d useful Die Zielrichtung und FunFully agree
ot transparentHowever,
at all Somewhat
such non-transparency at useful
certain pointsThe in the
Register
process is aneeds toPartially
sensible be
minimum agree
balanced instrument
by transparencyto enable andoversight
opportunities
of theforintef
Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Certaines rencontre de se Fully
fontagree
en dehors des heures et des jours prvu par
Il faut d'urgence faire Not useful at all Exemple RDV le dimanche Partially
matinagree
pour un petit lobby-brunch....( Diesel Gate)
Et ce n'est pas forcmenSomewhat useful Cependant, cela ne suffiNo opinion
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Not useful at all Rejestr jako element funDisagree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
It is not clear to me as No opinion I and many of my friendsNo opinion
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
Zuerst werden endlose TNot useful at all Welches angebliche TranDisagree
i risultati delle loro op Not useful at all bisogna monitorare le attDisagree
Wahrscheinlich ist viele Very useful Wie vorhin angesprochen Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful No opinion
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
latively transparent No opinion Partially agree
The availability of docu Somewhat useful Fully agree
Alle Verhandlungen und Somewhat useful Der Spatz in der Hand i Partially agree
Entweder, es gibt keine fVery useful Es muss aber zwingend Fully agree
Relatively transparent is Somewhat useful The Register is only helpPartially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful What do we know about Fully i agree
latively transparent
Transparency is good at EU level for most things, some free trade deals are notagree
Somewhat useful Fully being brokered transparently but are however
Everybody should be able No opinion I didn't even know of its No opinion
More work should be spent Veryinto
useful
integrating the EU citizens in the EU life Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful "en vue dinfluer sur l Fully agree
Although all the efforts Somewhat useful As stated before if two Disagree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
In einzelnen Fllen, z.B Very useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
La composicin de los grSomewhat useful Se debe exigir registrar Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
No opinion A mandatory lobby transp Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Disagree
ot transparent at all Very useful If you have nothing to h Fully agree
neexistuj jednoduch nNot useful at all ja prv krt poujem o r Disagree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful However, it needs greatePartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Image may be more at stSomewhat useful Transparency is but one Fully agree
Ich habe diese Antworto Somewhat useful Das bisherige Transparen Fully agree
A mandatory lobby transp Somewhat useful A lobby register should nFully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
1. Much more can and must be done to boost transparency.
ot transparent at all No opinion No opinion
2. A mandatory lobby transparency register must require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date inform
They
3. All EU decision-makers must be banned from meeting with unregisteredFully
mostly have marketi Somewhat useful It is useful if people w agreeand must oblige them to publish on-line lis
lobbyists
ot transparent4.atTrilogue
all talks, by which 90% of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behindagree
Somewhat useful Fully closed doors, must be made as the exception
latively transparent
5. Membership of expert Somewhat
and advisory useful
groups of the
1. The
Commission
existing lobby
must Partially
register
have fullis agreeflawedtoand
transparency
highly prevent
this consultation
privileged
The EU institutions have introduced some important transparency measures although transparency varies betweenaccess
must lead
them. and
The
6. Open data must be implemented Somewhat useful to ensure that2.EU A lobby
documents
registerand must
information
no
Fully longer
agree
are
be published
voluntary but on-line
mandatory
and made andeasily
legally avail
find
ot transparentLobby
at all register: As mentioned Very useful Partially agree
elsewhere there should be a legally-binding register, with comprehensive disclosure requiremen
ot transparentMuch
at all more can and mustNot beuseful
done to at boost transparency
all Partially agree
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date informa
Proactive meetings transparency:
latively transparent Somewhat Alluseful
EU institutions Theshould
idea ofmeet a register
only with
of Fully
lobbyists
registered
agreeand lobbyists,
their activities
lists ofas meetings
a tool toshould
bring transpa
be pro
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige them to publish online li
Le prsident
Trilogue de by
talks, la Commi
whichSomewhat
90% of EUuseful law is decided C'est la moiti du
in fast-track mode strict Fullyclosed
behind agree doors, must be made to the exception in
ot transparentOn-line
at all lists of
Membership of
meetings Very
expert and
should be held in a centralised,
useful
advisory groups of the
However,
The
Commission
searchable
existing
the present
lobby
must
database
register
Fully
register
have fullis
for
is deeply
each institution.
agree
transparency
highly
flawed and serious changes must res
flawedtoand prevent
this consultation
privileged access
must informa
lead
and to co
A mandatory
Much more lobby
can transparency
and must be register
done to should
boost require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing
transparency. accurate and up-to-date
Open
AllAEU data must be
decision-makers implemented
Somewhat
should to useful
ensure
be banned that EU
A lobby
documents
register andshould
information
no
Fullylonger agree
are be
published
voluntary online
but mandatory
and made and
easily
legally
available
find
Trilogues: Theselobby
mandatory informal
transparency registerfrom
inter-institutional meeting
meetings
shouldA lobby
require with
between all unregistered
register thewhich
EU European
lobbyistsis nolobbyists
toParliament,
longer
register,and should
voluntary, oblige
the Council
disclosing but ofthem
which
accurate theisandto up-to-date
publish
European
backed online
by Union
the force
an
infor li
In the public's
Trilogue percepti
talks, by which Somewhat
90% of EU useful
law is decidedIn
The and
in of itself
existing
fast-track itmode
lobby is not u Disagree
register
behind is closed
highly flawed
doors, must
and this
be consultation
made to the exception
must lead in
to
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige them to publish online
There
Access istoprobably
Membership
Trilogue talks, some
of expert
documents: tVery
and
Reforms
by which useful
advisory
90% groups
toofbring
EU the of
law theAs
Access
is ACommission
decidedlobby
to register
a result,
Documents a must
in fast-track should
haveno
commitment Fully
regulation
mode fulllonger
behind agree
transparency
to1049/2001
start be voluntary
intotoline
negotiating
closed doors, prevent
abut
mustwith mandatory
privileged
legally-binding
bethe
madeTreaty and
access
of legally
lobby
the Lisbon andfind
register
exception by co
w
in
Open data must be implemented
Somewhat to useful
ensure
Membership of expert and advisory groups of theThe that EU documents
Commission and
existing lobby information
Fully
must register
have fullis agree
are published
transparency
highly flawed,toonline
not andprivileged
prevent
easy made
to easily
navigate toavailable
accessfind and
ap
European
Open data Ombudsman: Somewhat
All European
must be implemented useful
to Ombudsman
ensure thatInEU the
decisions
A meantime,
lobby
documents on transparency
register before
and
should Fully
a nolegally-binding
information should
agree
longerarebe be binding
lobby online
published
voluntary register
for
butEU institutions.
is introduced,
mandatory
and madeandeasily it availa
will bb
legally
Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
All lobbyists MUST be r Somewhat useful The general idea is fine Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
ot transparentThe
at allEU
Much is still to be donehave
institutions toNot useful
boost at all
transparency.
introduced someA lobby register should
important bePartially
mandatory
transparency agree and legallyalthough
measures binding. It should require al
Fast-track
transparency decisions
varies behindSomewhat
closed
between them.doors
useful
Much more can and must be done to boost transparency should
There be
A commitment
isan exception
much toand
start
that notnegotiating
could Fully
the rule
agree
be asa it
legally
happens
improved binding
today.lobby
across An open
register
the EUdata
should
policybemu
institutions in
closed doors and only Somewhat
well-resourced
useful lobbies
Thepresentregisterishig
have access Fully
to trilogue
agree documents.
There should be a ban on any private meetings by all MEP's and lobby group The publication of a
ot transparent atAallmandatory lobby transparency Somewhat register
useful should Allrequire shouldNo
all EU lobbyists
such meetings to opinion
be register,
in a public disclosing
arena. accurate and up-to-date infor
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent atAllallEU decision-makers should
Very useful be banned from meeting with unregistered Fully lobbyists
agree and should oblige them to publish online
ot transparent at all Very useful Disagree
ot transparent atTrilogue talks, by which Very90% of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behind closed doors, must be made to the exception
all useful Fully agree
Much more can and must be done to boost The existing lobby register is highly flawed and this consultation must lead
transparency
EUMembership
decision-makers shoul Somewhat useful TheCommission
existing lobby registPartially agree
A mandatory of expert
lobby and advisory
transparency groups
register of the
should must
require all EU lobbyists havetofull transparency
register, disclosing to prevent
accurateprivileged accessinfor
and up-to-date and
how many online petitio Somewhat useful A lobby register should Disagree
no longer be voluntary but mandatory and legally fi
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige them to publish online
ot transparent atTrilogue
all datatalks,
Open mustbybewhich Very90%
useful
implemented to ensure that EU documents and Fully
information agreeare published
of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behind closed doors, must be made to the exception online and made easily availa
Membership of expert Somewhat and advisory useful
groups of theThe Commission
existing lobby
must register
haveFully agree
fullis transparency
highly flawedtoand prevent
this consultation
privileged access
must leadand
DaOpen
sie Treffen
data must mit nich Somewhat useful
be implemented to ensure thatDas EU Lobbyregister
A lobby
documents
register andist information
shoulddeFully agree
no longer arebe published
voluntaryonline but mandatory
and madeand easily
legally
availa fi
Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Somewhat useful. Partially agree
ot transparentMuch
at all more can and mustSomewhat useful
be done to boost transparency Fully agree
ot transparentAatmandatory
all Very useful
lobby transparency register should requireThe existing
all EUlobby
lobbyists toPartially
register register,
is highly agree
disclosing
flawed and accurate
this consultation
and up-to-date
must informa
lead to
All EU decision-makers should Somewhatbe banned
useful from meeting with unregisteredFully lobbyists agreeand should oblige them to publish online li
ot transparent at all Not useful at all A register does not stop Disagree
Take the example of Elma Somewhat useful Its usefulness must be shDisagree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Even if a lobbyist is on Partially agree
This is impossible to as Somewhat useful Fully agree
Somewhat useful Fully agree
The lack of transparencySomewhat useful If the Register does not Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterFully agree
The EP looks more transparent, and it could not be otherwise. The Commission and the Council should be transparent... So, m
latively transparent Very useful We believe the Transparen Fully agree
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date informa
Meetings with big busineVery
All EU decision-makers shoulduseful
be banned from meeting with unregisteredNo opinionand should oblige them to publish online li
lobbyists
latively transparent Very useful We believe
Trilogue talks, by which 90% of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behind closed the Transparen Fully agree doors, must be made to the exception in
Es wird Lobbyarbeit
Membership of expertnurandVery useful groups of theThe
advisory Commission
existing lobby have Fully
must register agree flawedtoand
fullistransparency
highly prevent
this consultation
privileged access
must lead
and to co
Open data must be implemented Somewhat to useful
ensure that EU A lobby
documents
registerandshould
information
noFully
longer agree
arebe published
voluntaryonline but mandatory
and madeand easily
legally
available
find
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Wer bestimmt, wer im TraPartially agree
Trilogue talks, by whi Very useful A lobby register should nFully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Das TranzparenzregisterPartially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparentMuch
at all more can and mustVery be done
usefulto boost transparency Fully agree
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date informa
the EUROGROUP
All They
EU decision-makers meets Somewhat
in useful
shouldtransparent
be bannedalthoughfrom meeting Disagree
a) are at best minimally manywith wouldunregistered lobbyists at
say not transparent and all.should oblige them to publish online li
viel zu undurchsichtig
Trilogue talks, by which duVery
90%useful
of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behind Fullyclosedagree doors, must be made to the exception in
b) See b) above.
ot transparentMembership
c)atThere
all should of expert
beand andVery
a mandatory useful
advisory groups oflobbyists
transparent theThe
Commission
The existing
register lobby
existing mustany
lobby
with register
have
register Fully
fullis
fraud agree
transparency
highly
isbeing
highly flawed
made
flawed toand
prevent
illegal,
and this
this
which consultation
privileged
consultation access
carry heavy must
must lead
and to
sanctions.
lead co
to
Much more can must be done to boost transparency
Open
d) data
Trilogue must be
talks, implemented
bymust
whichSomewhat to useful
ensure that EU
A lobby
documents
registerandshould
information
noFully
longer agree
are be
published
voluntary online
but mandatory
and made and
easily
legally
available
find
MuchA mandatory
more can lobby
and be90%doneofto
transparency EU law is
register
boost decided
should A lobby in fast-track
require
transparency register
all EU should
mode no
lobbyists behind
tolonger closed
register,be voluntary
doors, must
disclosing but mandatory
be made
accurate andto and
be legally
the except
up-to-date find
infor
eg
e) TTIP
Open
All EU they
data do what
must
decision-makersbe th Very useful
implemented
should be to ensure
banned that
from EU
meetingdocuments
with and
unregistered Partially
information lobbyistsagree
are published
and should online
oblige and
themmade
to easily
publish availa
online
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date informa
AllTrilogue talks, by which
EU decision-makers Somewhat
90%
should useful
beofbanned
EU lawfrom
is decided
meeting in with
fast-track mode behind
unregistered Fully
lobbyists agree
closed
anddoors,
shouldmust obligebethem
madetotopublish
the exception
online li
ot transparentTrilogue
atMembership
all talks, ofbyexpert Very
which and useful
90%advisory
of EU law groups of the
is decided he in existing
Commission lobby
fast-track must
moderegister
haveFully
behind is full agree
highlytransparency
closed flawed
doors,and tothis
must prevent
beconsultation
madeprivileged
to themustaccess
lead and
exception toins
Open dataof
Membership must be implemented
expert andSomewhat
advisory useful
to ensure
groups thatThe
of the ACommission
EUlobby
documents
register
existing lobby
mustshould
and information
no
register
have Fully
fulllonger agreeare
beflawed
istransparency
highly voluntary
published
toand but
online
thismandatory
prevent and made
consultation
privileged andeasily
legally
access
must availa
lead
andfind
to
co
Open data must be implemented Somewhat to useful
ensure that EU A lobby
documents
registerandshould
information
noFully
longer agree
arebe published
voluntaryonline but mandatory
and madeand easily
legally
available
bind
Open data must be impleSomewhat useful The existing lobby regis Fully agree
Die EU-Brger werdern iVery useful Die Beeinflussung von En Disagree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
There is a general feeli Somewhat useful The lobby register shouldFully agree
ot transparentMuch
at all more can and mustSomewhat be done touseful boost transparency including havingPartially a mandatory agreelobby transparency register that would
All EU decision-makers s
Somewhat useful The existing lobby regis Fully
Trilogue talks, by which 90% of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behind closed doors, must be scrapped. There must be agree
ot transparentMembership
at all of expert and Somewhat
advisory useful
groups of thebetter Commissionthan nothing must have but Fully agree
full transparency to prevent privileged access and co
Open data must be implemented Somewhat to useful
ensure that EU It isdocuments
somewhatand usefulinformation
butFully agreeare published online and made easily available
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
Open data must be impleSomewhat useful A lobby register should nFully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all No opinion Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
Much more canabsoluti
undemokratisch, and must be doneuseful
Somewhat to boost transparency
Das Register kann nur ePartially agree
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date infor
ot transparentThe
at all level isVery useful Fully agree
Alltransparency
EU decision-makers not the
should same
be banned through themeeting
from EU Institutions.
with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige them to publish online
The European
Trilogue Parliament
talks, by which Very
is90%
highly
useful
of transparent;
EU law is decided the EUinCommission
fast-track mode relatively
Fullytransparent
behind agree
closed doors,and must
the Council
be made nottotransparent
the exception at a
aufMembership
meine Anfragen in f Very useful
of expert and advisory groups of theThe Commission
existing lobby must registerFully agree
have fullistransparency
highly flawedtoand prevent
this consultation
privileged access
must leadand
latively transparent
Open data must be implemented Somewhat useful to ensure that EU A lobby
documentsregister andshould Fully
information agree
no longer arebepublished
voluntaryonline
but mandatory
and madeand easilylegally
availab
Somewhat useful
Die Kommunen begren die beachtlichen Anstrengungen der EU-Institutionen zur Fully agree
ot transparentSicherstellung
at all von mehr Somewhat
Transparenz. useful
Positiv hervorzuheben sind hier z. B. Partially
die agree
ghly transparent
grundstzlich recht gute Very useful von Dokumenten, das amtliche
Verfgbarkeit Fully agree
ot transparentMuch
at all more der
Verzeichnis canEU and(Who must isbe doneund
Who)
Somewhat to boost
useful transparency
die Information If it isber
not aTreffen
mandatory der No opinion
A
atmandatory lobby transparency register Dieshould require all
derEU lobbyists to register, desdisclosing
Registersaccurate and up-to-date inform
ot transparenthochrangigen
all Kommissionsmitarbeiter.
Very useful Bemhungen
Die Zielrichtung EU-Brgerbeauftragten,
und Funktionen
Fully agree zur Regulierung der Lobbyarb
All EU decision-makers
auf mehr Transparenz u.Somewhat should be banned
a. bei der from meeting
Zusammensetzung sind with unregistered
grundstzlich
von als eher lobbyists
ntzlich and should oblige
einzustufen. Das them to publish
Register mit all online
den
Trilogue talks, by which 90% useful Fully closed
agree doors, must be made to the exception in
Sachverstndigengruppen, denof EU law is decided
TTIP-Verhandlungen inund
Behrden fast-track
den modeVerbnden
behind
undTrilogverhandlungen
ihren zu berfrachten, die Teil des
latively transparent
Membership of expert Somewhat
and zu advisory useful
groups of theThe
Commission
existing lobby
mustIhre
registerFully agree
have fullistransparency
highly flawed
hinzuwirken, sind ebenfalls betonen. Zustzlich Multi-Level-Governance-Systems
sollten im Portal sind und toand
prevent
sich this consultation
privilegedmit
entsprechend access
must
den leadand toc
Open
Die data
Kommunen must be
begren Very
implemented
die useful to ensure
beachtlichen
Stimme in Europa (http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/index_de.htm) that EU
A
Anstrengungenlobby
documentsregister
der
EU-Institutionenalle and
should
EU-Institutionen
abstimmen, Fully
information
no
Formen von agree
longerare
zur be
published
voluntaryonline
but mandatory
and made
ist jedoch nicht zweckdienlich. Vor diesem and
easily
legally
availab
find
Sicherstellung
Konsultationenvon mehr Somewhat
aufgefhrt Transparenz.
werden. So useful
Positivauch
wren hervorzuheben
Hintergrund sind
gezielte Konsultationen
ist eshier Fully
z. B.
wichtig, dieagree
dass sich das Transparenzregister nicht hin zum
Much more Interessentrger
grundstzlich
bestimmter can andgute
recht mustSomewhat
b unter Angabe
Verfgbarkeit useful
von Dokumenten, The existing das
des Konsultationsdatums
einzigen lobby registFully
amtliche
E-Mail-Verteiler agree
der EU-Institutionen fr die Einbindung der
ot transparentVerzeichnis
at all der EU (Who
(Treffen/Einreichfrist), des isKonsultationsthemas,
Very Who)
usefulund die Information des ber Treffen der
unterschiedlichsten
Konsultationsdokuments AkteureFullyentwickelt.
agree Wichtig ist zudem, dass Vertreter
ot transparenthochrangigen
und
at all Kommissionsmitarbeiter.
der eingeladenen/angeschriebenen
Very useful Die Bemhungen
Interessentrger-Kategorien
ffentlicher derBehrden
EU-Brgerbeauftragten,
zuund ihrer
Fully Verbnde weiterhin auch auerhalb des
agree
ot transparentauf mehr Transparenz
verffentlichen.
at all Dies wrde u.Somewhat
a. bei der Zusammensetzung
zu mehr TransparenzDie
useful Zielrichtung
von
Transparenz-Register-Systems
fhren. Vor allem und Funktionen
htten die agree
Fully desMglichkeit
die Registers zur Regulierung
haben, der Lobbyarb
einen Zugangsauswei
Sachverstndigengruppen,
Interessentrger einen berblick, den TTIP-Verhandlungen
inwieweit sie bei sind
denden und
grundstzlich
den Trilogverhandlungen
EU-Institutionen
Konsultationen, alszueher
die ntzlich einzustufen.
beantragen. Darber hinaus Das ist
Register
es unser mitAnliegen,
all den da
Pregledno delovanje evro Somewhat useful Javni nadzor je uinkovitFully agree
hinzuwirken, sind ebenfallsoffen
nicht fr die Allgemeinheit zu betonen. Zustzlich
stehen, eingebunden Behrden
6 sollten
werden.imundPortal
Imihren Ihre
Verbnden zu berfrachten, die Teil des
Portal
ot transparentStimme
at all in
knnten imEuropa
Nachgang Very
ggf. useful
(http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/index_de.htm)
diesbezgliche DokumenteMulti-Level-Governance-Systems
Konsultationsbeitrge
hochgeladen alle werden.
Formen
vonPartially
von agree
ffentlichen
Ferner sind und sich entsprechend
Behrden und Verbnden mit den
unabhng
ot transparentKonsultationen
at all
sollten die Verhandlungen Very
aufgefhrt werden. useful
ber die So wren auch
Ausgestaltung EU-Institutionen
gezielte
davon,
des knftigen
ob sieKonsultationen
abstimmen,
freiwillig Fully
im Register agree
ist jedoch nicht zweckdienlich.
eingetragen sind in einer Voreigenen
diesem
Mandatory
bestimmter lobby
Transparenz-Registers register
Interessentrger Somewhat
ffentlich useful des
unterstattfinden.
Angabe Very
Auerdem limited.
Konsultationsdatums
Hintergrund
Kategorie ist noch Should
ist es
verffentlicht be
wichtig,
nicht sehr mFully
dass
werden, agree
sich das Transparenzregister
die somit nicht hin zum
auch der Zahl der vertretenen
Die richtige Antwort:
(Treffen/Einreichfrist),
transparent, "verhltnismig
des
wie Konsultationsbeitrge
Somewhat intransparent"
Konsultationsthemas,
gewichtet des
useful kann
einzigen
Brger
werden. man hier trgt.
Konsultationsdokuments
E-Mail-Verteiler
Rechnung leider Fully
nicht geben.
der EU-Institutionen
agree fr die Einbindung der
Kurzum
ot transparentund
at all es muss viel gemacht
der eingeladenen/angeschriebenen werden, um
Very useful die Transparenz
Interessentrger-Kategorien
unterschiedlichstenzu erhhen. Akteure
zu Fullyentwickelt.
agree Wichtig ist zudem, dass Vertreter
Offenlegung
verffentlichen. derDies
Treffen mit zu
wrde Lobbyisten
mehr fr die 30,000
Transparenz Beamten.
ffentlicher
fhren. Vor Behrden
allem htten
und die
ihrer Verbnde weiterhin auch auerhalb des
TTIP und CETA Verhandlu Very useful Mit jedem Berater steig Fully agree
Interessentrger einen berblick, inwieweit sie bei Transparenz-Register-Systems
den Konsultationen, die die Mglichkeit haben, einen Zugangsauswei
ot transparentDie
at all drfen nichtVery useful Fully agree
nichtGesetze
fr die Allgemeinheit hinter
offen verschlossenen
stehen, eingebunden Tren mit Interessenvertretern
den EU-Institutionen
werden. Im Portal zu beantragen. ausgehandelt
Darberwerden.
hinaus istDieesZwischenergebnisse
unser Anliegen, da
latively transparent
knnten im Nachgang No
ggf. opinion
diesbezgliche DokumenteKonsultationsbeitrge
hochgeladen werden.
vonPartially agreeBehrden und Verbnden unabhng
ffentlichen
Ferner
ot transparentMuch more can and mustVery be done to boost transparency
at all
Die Brger
sollten mssen
die Verhandlungen ber das beruseful
Netz
die leichte Einsichtsmglichkeiten
Ausgestaltung Lobbyregister
davon,
des knftigen
ob EU sindin die
sie lobbyists
freiwillig im Fully agree
verpflichtend
Informationen zudisclosing
erstellen.
und EU-Dokumente
Alle EU-Lobbyisten
haben. haben sich
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all to Register
register, eingetragen sind
accurate in einer
and eigenen
up-to-date informa
Transparenz-Registers Somewhat
ffentlich useful
stattfinden. Auerdem
Kategorie ist noch
verffentlicht
nicht sehr Fully
werden,
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige them to publish online li agreedie somit auch der Zahl der vertretenen
transparent,
Trilogue wieby
talks, Konsultationsbeitrge
whichSomewhat
90% of EUuseful lawgewichtet
is decided Brger
werden. Rechnung
in fast-track mode trgt. Fullyclosed
behind agree doors, must be made to the exception in
ot transparentMembership
at all of expert and Somewhat
advisory useful
groups of theThe Commission
existing lobby have Fully
must register agree flawedtoand
fullistransparency
highly prevent
this consultation
privileged access
must leadand to
co
Open data must be implemented Somewhat to useful
ensure that EU A lobby
documentsregister and should
information
noFully
longer
agree
arebe published
voluntaryonline
but mandatory
and madeand easily
legally
available
find
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful C'tait vraiment pour encPartially agree
Als Brger findet man n Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparentMuch
at all more can and mustVery be done
usefulto boost transparency Fully agree
A mandatory
Much more lobby
can and transparency
must be doneregister
to boost should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date informa
transparency
De
All gang
EU van zaken rondshould
decision-makers Very useful
beregister
bannedshould from meeting with unregistered Partially agree
A mandatory lobby transparency require all EU lobbyists to lobbyists and shouldaccurate
register, disclosing oblige them to publish online
and up-to-date informa li
latively transparent
Trilogue talks, by whichshould Somewhat
90% of useful Partially agree
All EU decision-makers beEU law isfrom
banned decided
meetingin fast-track mode behind
with unregistered closed
lobbyists doors,
and must
should be made
oblige themtotothe exception
publish onlineinli
ot transparentMembership
at all
Trilogue of expert
talks, by which andNot
90% useful
of EUat
advisory all is decided
groups
law Lobbyist
of theTheCommission
inexistingshould
fast-track lobby
must beforbi
mode register
have Disagree
behindfullistransparency
highly flawed
closed doors,tomust
and
prevent
this
be consultation
privileged
made to theaccess
must lead
exception andin
to
co
Open data must be implemented
Somewhat to
Membership of expert and advisory groups of theThe useful
ensure that EUA lobby
documents
Commission register
existing lobby and should
information
must register noFully
longer
agree
are
have fullistransparencybe
published
voluntary
highly flawedtoand online
but
prevent mandatory
and made
this consultation and
easily
privileged access legally
available
must lead find
and to
co
Das
OpenTransparenzregister
data must be implemented Somewhat
s to useful
ensure that EU Das
A lobby Transparenzregister
documentsregister and should Fully
information
no s longer
agree
arebe published
voluntaryonline
but mandatory
and madeand easily
legally
available
find
Somewhat useful Fully agree
Konsultationen aufgefhrt werden. So wren auch EU-Institutionen
gezielte Konsultationen
abstimmen, ist jedoch nicht zweckdienlich. Vor diesem
bestimmter Interessentrger unter Angabe des KonsultationsdatumsHintergrund ist es wichtig, dass sich das Transparenzregister nicht hin zum
(Treffen/Einreichfrist), des Konsultationsthemas, des einzigen
Konsultationsdokuments
E-Mail-Verteiler der EU-Institutionen fr die Einbindung der
und der eingeladenen/angeschriebenen Interessentrger-Kategorienunterschiedlichsten Akteure zu entwickelt. Wichtig ist zudem, dass Vertreter
Much more can Dies
verffentlichen. and must
wrdebezudone mehrtoTransparenz
boost transparency
ffentlicher
fhren. VorBehrden
allem htten unddie ihrer Verbnde weiterhin auch auerhalb des
A mandatory lobby
Interessentrger transparency
einen berblick,register
inwieweit should require
sie bei all EU lobbyistsdie
Transparenz-Register-Systems
den Konsultationen, to register, diedisclosing
Mglichkeit accurate
haben,and einenup-to-date informa
Zugangsauswei
All EUfr
nicht decision-makers
die Allgemeinheit should
offenbe banned
stehen, from meeting
eingebunden with unregistered
den EU-Institutionen
werden. Im Portal lobbyists and
zu beantragen. shouldhinaus
Darber oblige ist
themes to publish
unser onlineda
Anliegen, li
Il reste beaucoup
Trilogue
knnten imtalks, bywhich
Nachgang fairggf.
Very
90% useful
of EU law isDokumente
diesbezgliche decidedL'inscription
in fast-track surmode
Konsultationsbeitrge
hochgeladen le regist
werden.
von Fully
behind agree doors,
closed
ffentlichen
Ferner must be
Behrden undmade the exception
Verbnden in de
unabhng
The lobbying
Membership
sollten ofmade theand
expert
die Verhandlungen Not useful
ber die at
advisory all
groups
Ausgestaltung Lobbying
of theThe
davon, obshould
Commission
desexisting sielobby
knftigen must beregister
stopp
have
freiwillig imD isagree
full istransparency
highlyeingetragen
Register flawedtoandprevent
this consultation
sind privileged access
must lead
in einer eigenen and to co
Open data must be implemented
Transparenz-Registers Somewhat
ffentlich to useful
ensure that
stattfinden. EU
A lobby
Auerdemdocuments
Kategorie register
ist noch andshould
information
verffentlicht
nicht sehrnoFully
longer
werden, agree
are be
diepublished
voluntary
somit auchonline
but
der mandatory
and
Zahl
Grundstzlich halten wir das EU-Transparenzregister fr ein eher ntzliches I made
der and
easily
legally
available
vertretenen find
transparent, wie Konsultationsbeitrge
Somewhat useful gewichtet Brger
werden.
In Rechnung
der heutigen Formtrgt.
sind Fully agree groe europische Interessenvertreter u
allerdings
Prinzipiell agieren eur Somewhat useful Disagree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
Les ngociations en couNot useful at all L'exactitude des donnesPartially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful No opinion
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Wir als Kommune begre Somewhat useful Grundstzlich wird die Z Fully agree
Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Far more needs to be don Somewhat useful Das Transparenzregister
Inclusion in the registe Fully ist schlecht
agree durchdacht. Es enthlt Ausnahmen fr g
/Regionalverbnde unter diese Kategorie fallen. Tatschlich finden sich dort v
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful von Lobbybudgets scheint Partially
- wennagreeman Berichten einschlgiger Transparenz-
Es sollte mehr fr Trans Somewhat useful Das Lobbyregister sollte Fully agree
Beispielsweise sind die VSomewhat useful Es beginnt langsam ntzPartially agree
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all Disagree
latively transparent Somewhat useful per essere pi utile dov Fully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
The Council is not transpVery useful Fully agree
De puissants lobbys sontVery useful Das bestehende RegisterFully agree
ist sehr fehlerhaft und muss ernsthaft verbessert w
Hier muss viel mehr get Somewhat useful Ein Register
Das sollte nicht freiwillig
Transparenzregister Fully agree
ist schlecht sondern verpflichtend
durchdacht. und rechtlich
Es enthlt Ausnahmen bindendfr g
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all von Lobbybudgets scheint Disagree
- wenn man Berichten einschlgiger Transparenz-
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Die Entscheidungsprozes Somewhat useful Das bestehende RegisterFully agree
Die Mitgliedschaft in E Somewhat useful Das Lobbyregister sollte Fully agree
Much
Much more
more can
can and
and must be
be done
mustSomewhatdone to boost
boost transparency
touseful transparency.
latively transparent Partially agree
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date informa
Warum
All werden der ffent
EU decision-makers Very useful
should beregister
bannedshould Sehr ntzlich,
from meeting with wenn a l Partially
unregistered lobbyists agree
and shouldaccurate
be obliged toup-to-date
publish online lis
A
In mandatory
den
latively transparent lobby transparency
vergangenen Jahren haben
Somewhat die europischen
useful require all EU
Institutionen lobbyists
wichtige toFully
register,
Schritteagree disclosing
zur Verbesserung derand
Transparenz informa
gesetzt
Trilogue talks, by which 90% of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behind closed doors,
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige them to publish online li must be made to the exception in
latively transparent
Membership of expert and Somewhat
advisory useful
groups of theThe Commission
existing lobby have Fully
must register agree flawedtoand
fullistransparency
highly prevent
this consultation
privileged access
must lead
and to co
Lobbyregister:
Open data must Die
be BAK tritt
implementedfr eintoverbindliches
Somewhat useful
ensure that Lobbyregister
Ein
EU
A verpflichtendes
lobby
documents
register mit
and weitgehenden
shouldLobbyregister
information
noFully
longer Offenlegungspflichten
agree
are stellt
be einenonline
published
voluntary wichtigen
but ein.
Bestandteil
mandatory
and madeDas Register
and
easily zur
legallySchaf
brau
available
bind
Trilogue talks, by which 90% of EU law is decided Das in Transparenzregister
fast-track mode behind ist schlecht durchdacht.
closed doors, must be Esmade
enthltto Ausnahmen
the exceptionfring
In groen Teilen
Membership of arbeitand
expert Notadvisory
useful at all
groups of thevon
Das
The Lobbybudgets
Transparenzregister
Commission
existing lobby
must scheint
register
have Disagree
ist
full -isschlecht
wenn man
transparency
highly Berichten
durchdacht.
flawed to
and
preventeinschlgiger
Es
this enthlt
consultation
privileged Transparenz-
Ausnahmen frtog
ExpertInnengruppen: Um mehr Transparenz berNur die ein
Arbeit
verpflichtendes
der ExpertInnengruppen
Transparenzregister zu schaffen,
kannsind
dafr sorgen,access
mustregelm
verpflichtende,
dass lead
and
auch wco
latively transparent Not useful at all von Lobbybudgets scheint Disagree
- wenn man Berichten einschlgiger Transparenz-
Die europischen Institutionen haben mittlerweile auf den von verschiedenen Seiten geuerten Vorwurf der Intransparenz re
Open data must be
Verffentlichung vonimplemented
Somewhat
Terminen: Wieto useful
ensure that EU
bereits zuvor A
Dielobby
documents
angefhrt,register
Entsendung and
fordert should
voninformation
die noFully
Personen
BAK longeragree
eineare bepublished
voluntaryonline
inOffenlegung but Termine
ExpertInnengremien
aller mandatory
anddermadederand
easily
legally
available
EU-Kommission
europischen findm
latively transparent Somewhat useful
Nicht zu Unrecht wird teilweise angemerkt, dass der DasZugang
bestehendezu gewissen Fully
RegisterDokumenten agree
ist ein ntzliches verbessert
Instrument.
werden Dieknnte.
BrgerDabei
Europas ist z.e
Trilog: Die informellen, inter-institutionellen
Very useful TreffenUmzwischen
die Eintragungen
Europischer in das
Fully
Kommission,
Register
agree aktuellEuropischem
zu halten,Parlament
sollte zweimal
und Europ
jhrlich
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all
Zur Transparenz gehrt nach Ansicht der Bayerischen Das Transparenzregister
Gleichzeitig
Staatsregierung
sollte das auch, Disagree
Transparenzregister
dass neben derauch grundstzlichen
nur die Organisationen
Zugangsmglic und
Nicht nur die Lobyisten mssen Somewhat alle useful
Daten offenlegen - auch die Institutionen Fullybrauchen
agree strenge Regeln, um die bermige B
Trilogue Gesprche im No Rahmen
opinion von Gesetzesnderungen
Die aktuellemssenVersion die desabsolute
Fully agree Ausnahme bleiben und die Gesprche live u
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially ist schlecht agreedurchdacht. Es enthlt Ausnahmen fr g
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all von Lobbybudgets scheint Disagree
- wenn man Berichten einschlgiger Transparenz-
Some institutions are moSomewhat useful The user interface doesn'Fully agree
Auswahl von ExpertengrSomewhat useful Ntzlich solange es fr Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful
Die angestrebte Transparenz ist positiv zu bewerten. Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful
Wnschenswert wre - neben den Bemhungen um mehr Transparenz bei Fully
der agree
Zusammensetzung von
latively transparent
Sachverstndigengruppen, Very useful
den TTIP-VerhandlungenDas und
Transparenzregister Fully
wird agree
den Trilogverhandlungen positiv
- auch
bewertet,
die Auffhrung
jedoch sollte
der es
Konsultationsfor
auch nicht mi
Die Verhandlungen ber Somewhat
die Ausgestaltung
useful des knftigen
Lokale Behrden,
Transparenzregisters
die TeilFully
des agree
Multi-Level-Governance-Systems
sollten ffentlich stattfinden. sind und sich
Institutions can be both Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
The Council is the least Somewhat useful Regulating is not the co Partially agree
They are relatively tran Very useful The Transparency Register Fully agree
Mai pot fi mult mbuntVery useful Mai trebuie promovat priPartially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful When the Commission liste Fully agree
there should be a categoVery useful Fully agree
They are transparent onlSomewhat useful The EU and the transpare Partially agree
Im Verhltnis zu nationa Somewhat useful Wer sich eine stndige VPartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Transparency has certainVery useful it is a natural evolution Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
There is too much influe Very useful It should be easier to fi Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
The European InstitutionsSomewhat useful
are relatively transparent as regards to the accessFullytoagree
public documents and meetings. This has grea
However ECTAA deplores Very
thatuseful
access to certain documents or reports of specific
Fully agree
meetings is still limited, despite the lack of se
latively transparent Somewhat useful The transparency Registe Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
Say what you do and do Veryw useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
Our activities and contacVery useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
la trasparenza per tutti No opinion E' presumibile che la proPartially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Il n'y a aucune vrificat Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Muligt de er bne, men Very useful Fully agree
Somewhat useful No opinion
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
Transparenz ist anders!!Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Often the use of privacy Very useful It's surely a good impr Partially agree
Der dringende Verdacht Somewhat
latively transparent liegt nahe, dass
usefuldie Transparenz trotz Transparenzregister abnimmt, weil der politische Druck von Re
Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
VORSCHLAG:
latively transparent Very useful
Konstitutionelle Manahmen entwickeln und beschlieen, welche: Fully agree
The transparency of the Very useful My organisation, which i
1. die Integritt und die Unabhngigkeit der Mitarbeiter der Institutionen derPartially agree Union frdern; wie zum Beispiel Ein
Europischen
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Es abundante la informacDisagree
2. die Transparenz durch Erweiterung des Transparenzregisters verbessern, indem Einrichtungen wie zum Beispiel Kirchen un
Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
Please tell EU voters th Not useful at all Partially agree
Sie sind machtgeil, wolleVery useful Wenn Transparenzregister No opinion
Again: politicians (and Somewhat useful There are numerous organi Disagree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
I admit, that there are e Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
Would have liked option V oery useful Again openness and miniFully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful The ESNO's constituancies Fully agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
No opinion No opinion
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all I don't believe these regiDisagree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Permettre des personnSomewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
While some of the EU institutions have introducedThe some present
transparency
register ismeasures,
flawed andthesignificant
scope varieschanges vastlymust between
resultthem. from this c
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
1) Lobby register: A legally-binding register should be put in place, and should include comprehensive disclosure requirements
latively transparent Very useful All EU institutions
2) Proactive meetings transparency: A legally should
mandated
only meet
lobby Fully
with
registeragree
registered
is essential
lobbyists,
if alllists
lobbyists
of meetings
are to should
sign-upbe anp
ghly transparent
3) Trilogues: These informal Veryinter-institutional
useful meetings between the European Fully Parliament,
agree the Council of the European Union
ot transparent4)atAccess
all to documents:Very useful
Reforms to bring the Access
As a to result,
Documents
a commitment Fully
regulation agree
to start
1049/2001
negotiating
into line
a legally-binding
with the Treaty lobby
of Lisbon
register b
Somewhat useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Partially agree
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all Das TransparenzregisterDisagree
No opinion.
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Much more can and must be done to boost transparency
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date informa
latively transparent
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregisteredFully
Somewhat useful lobbyistsagreeand should be obliged to publish online lis
Draft documents are ofteVery useful
Trilogue talks, by which 90% of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behind closed Fully agree doors, must be made to the exception in
access
Membership
The to internal
EU institutions docu
of expert
have Somewhat
andintroduced useful
advisory groups
some important as
of theThe a consultant,
Commission
existing lobby
transparency this
must is
register
measures Partially
have fullisalthough agree
transparency
highly flawed toand
prevent
transparency thisvaries
consultation
privileged
between access
must lead
them. and to
Theco
Open data must be implemented Somewhat to useful
ensure that EU A lobby
documentsregister andshould
information
no
Fully
longer agree
arebepublished
voluntaryonline
but mandatory
and madeand easily legally
available
bind
Lobby
Trilogue register: As mentioned
discussions elsewhere there should be a legally-binding Fully
sh Very useful register, with comprehensive disclosure requiremen
agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
Proactive meetings transparency:
latively transparent All EU institutions
Theshould
idea ofonlya lobby
meetregister
withPartially
registered
as a tool lobbyists,
to bring transparency
lists of meetings to EU should
lobbyingbe prois
The EU institutions haveSomewhat introduced useful
some important transparency measures. agree
However, there is much that could be improved a
Most documents are in EVery useful Fully agree
Trilogues: These informal inter-institutional meetings A lobbybetween
register
thewhich
European
is noParliament,
longer voluntary, the Council
but which of theis European
backed by Union the forcean
Lobby register: As mentioned elsewhere
Somewhat usefulthere should be a legally-binding
The register must be maFully register with comprehensive disclosure requirement
agree
Die europischen
Access to documents: InstitReforms
Somewhat useful
to bring the Access Das
As a Transparenzregister
to result,
Documents a commitment
regulationPartially
startagree
to1049/2001 negotiating
into linea with
legally-binding
the Treaty of lobby
Lisbonregister
by w
Proactive
Of course meetings
! ... Theretransparency:
is Very useful All EU institutions
CEO should
has long-supported
only meet withFully the
registered
idea
agree of lobbyists
a lobby register
(or those aswho
a toolfalltounder
bring the transp
thre
European Ombudsman: Somewhat All European useful
Ombudsman In the
decisions
meantime,on transparency
before Fully
a legally-binding
should
agree be bindinglobby register
for EU institutions.
is introduced, it will b
Tobacco lobby: All organisations signed up to the For WHOs CEO, FCTC
a lobbyshould
register
make which
sureisitsno policies
longerand voluntary,
practices but are
which fullyiscompliant
backed b
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
The volume
Trilogues: and technicit
These informalSinter-institutional
omewhat useful meetings As abetween
result, we thewish
European
to seeFully agree
Parliament,
a commitment thetoCouncil
start negotiating
of the Europeana legally-bindin
Union an
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
TTIP: The European Commission Somewhatshould
usefulfollow theIn the
European
meantime,Ombudsmans
before Fully
a legally-binding
recommendations
agree lobbyand register
provideis introduced,
full transparency it will b
notMuch moretransparent
so much can and must be doneuseful
Somewhat to boost transparency Partially agree
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date infor
Il Registro funziona beni Very useful E' utile soprattutto per Fully agree
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should be obliged to publish online
ot transparent atTrilogue
all Somewhat useful
talks, by which 90% of EU law is decided Wouldinbe nice with
fast-track a betPartially
mode behind closed agreedoors, must be made to the exception
latively transparent
Membership of expert Somewhat useful Fully agree
Nekaj transparentnosti je,and
a eadvisory
zdale negroups of the
dovolj. The
Commission
Register existing
lobiranjalobby
must register
have
je zelo fullistransparency
pomemben, highly vendar
flawedtopa
and prevent
bo this consultation
privileged
potrebno sedanji access
must lead
and
register
The issuedata
Open is more
mustthe
be cimplemented
Somewhat useful
to ensure that EU A lobby
documents
register and
should Fully
information agree
no longer arebe published
voluntaryonline
but mandatory
and madeand easily legally
availa b
Somewhat useful
Vse evropske institucije naj se smejo sestajati le zVpisovanje registriranimi v register
lobisti.ne Fully
Seznam
more biti agree
vsehnasestankov
prostovoljni moraosnovi,
biti javno
ampak dostopen.
je potrebno z
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Who knowskion
Odloitve, jih which
evropskibasis
Somewhat useful pravic sprejme
varuh lovekovih If I feel that
Razpravo my concernobveznem
o otransparentnosti,
zakonsko Disagree
morajo registriranju
biti zavezujoelobistineza vse aktivnosti
evropske je institucije
treba za
Somewhat useful Fully agree
fucking jewish conspiracyNot useful at all fucking jewish conspiracyFully agree
established feature of EU decision-making,
bestimmter Interessentrger unter Angabe des but Konsultationsdatums
often
needed.undermine
einzigen accountability
E-Mail-Verteiler and
der EU-Institutionen fr die Einbindung der
Stimme in Europa
transparency of the(http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/index_de.htm)
EUdes legislative EU-Institutionen
process. Very little
A lobby register alle
information abstimmen,
is
which Formen
available
is no to von
istthe
longer jedoch
public nicht zweckdienlich.
voluntary, butistwhich Vor diesem
is backed by the force
(Treffen/Einreichfrist), Konsultationsthemas, des
unterschiedlichsten
Konsultationsdokuments Akteure entwickelt. Wichtig zudem, dass Vertreter
Konsultationen
because these aufgefhrttake
meetings werden.
place So wrenclosed
behind auch Hintergrund
gezielte
essential
doors andif Konsultationen
istlobbyists
all
only eswell-resourced
wichtig, dass sich das Transparenzregister nicht hindata zum
und der eingeladenen/angeschriebenen Interessentrger-Kategorien ffentlicher Behrden zuund ihrer Verbnde weiterhin auch auerhalb des wh
are to sign-up
lobbies and if the register is to contain
bestimmter
have access Interessentrger
to trilogue unter Angabe
documents. The des Konsultationsdatums
publicationeinzigen
an of
accurate
all E-Mail-Verteiler
documents
snapshot should
of derbeEU-Institutionen
lobbying required
in the EU fr die Einbindung
institutions so that der can se
citizens
verffentlichen. Dies wrde zu mehr TransparenzTransparenz-Register-Systems
fhren. Vor allem htten die die Mglichkeit haben, einen Zugangsauswei
(Treffen/Einreichfrist),
and in a timely and des Konsultationsthemas,
systematic manner. Furthermore, des
unterschiedlichsten
Konsultationsdokuments
influencing
there should beAkteure
EU decision-making,
public entwickelt.
access ontowhich Wichtig
issues, ist on
zudem,
whose dass Vertreter
behalf, and withda
Interessentrger einen berblick, inwieweit sie beidenden EU-Institutionen
Konsultationen, zudie beantragen. Darber hinaus ist es unser Anliegen,
und der
meetings, eingeladenen/angeschriebenen
and access to any reports Interessentrger-Kategorien
or notes ffentlicher
discussed
budgets. over the Behrden zu und ihrer Verbnde weiterhin auch auerhalb des
nicht fr die Allgemeinheit offen stehen, eingebunden Konsultationsbeitrge
werden. Im course
Portalvon of the process, Behrden
ffentlichen in und Verbnden unabhng
verffentlichen.
line
The with the
EU institutions Dies
procedures wrde
have for zu mehr
normal
introduced Transparenz
Parliament
some important Transparenz-Register-Systems
fhren.
committee
As a Vor
result, allem
meetings.
transparency a htten
commitment
measures dieto startdie
although Mglichkeit
negotiating
transparency a haben, einen
legally-binding Zugangsauswei
lobby register
knnten im Nachgang ggf. diesbezgliche Dokumentedavon, hochgeladen
ob sie freiwillig werden.
im Register
Fernereingetragen sindvaries between
in einer eigenenthem. The
Interessentrger
Access to einen Reforms
documents: berblick, to inwieweit
bring the sie bei
Access denden
placetoEU-Institutionen
Konsultationen,
Documents
by 2017. A zudie
regulation beantragen.
legally-binding 1049/2001
lobby Darber hinaus ist es unser Anliegen, da
sollten die Verhandlungen Very
ber useful
die AusgestaltungKategoriedes knftigen verffentlicht werden, Fully agree die somit auch der Zahl der vertretenen the o
register would give the authorities
nicht
into fr
line die
with Allgemeinheit
the Treaty of offen
Lisbon stehen,
by eingebunden
widening its 6
levy
scope werden.
fines
to Im
encompass
or other Portal
real allsanctions
EU institutions,
(including refusing to hold lobby meetings)
Lobby register: As mentioned
Transparenz-Registers elsewhere
ffentlich
Somewhat usefulthere
stattfinden. should
Auerdem
Brger beista noch
legally-binding
Rechnung nichttrgt. register,
sehrFullytransparent,
agree with comprehensive
wie Konsultationsbeitrge disclosure gewichtet
requiremen wo
knnten im Nachgang
bodies, offices
BUSINESSEUROPE and agenciesggf. diesbezgliche
believes currently
that the not Dokumente
covered
European Konsultationsbeitrge
refuse
are hochgeladen
to
to
institutions
The idea be
register
welcomed.
are or
quite werden.
on von
Such
those
transparent
of a lobby register asagree ffentlichen
Ferner
reforms
who andpost Behrden
inaccurate
acknowledges und Verbnden
information
the or
continuous
a tool to bring transparency to EU lobbying is
whounabhng
otherwi
efforts m
Die europischen
sollten Instit Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterFully
should die
Proactive Verhandlungen
recognise
meetings ber dieAll
thetransparency:
fundamental Ausgestaltung
nature
EU institutions davon,
of the right des
rules. ofknftigen
ob
Aaccess
should sie freiwillig
legally-binding
only tomeet im
information,
withlobbyRegister
and
register
registered toeingetragen
should belists
lobbyists, sind ofmeetings
introducedin einer eigenen
alongside
shouldabe clear
pro
latively transparent
Transparenz-Registers
ensure harm and public Somewhat
ffentlich
interest useful
stattfinden.
tests apply for Das
Auerdem
all Register
Kategorie ist
registration
exceptions. noch kann
verffentlicht
which nicht ntzl
sehr
clarifies Fully
werden,
what agreedie somit
constitutes auch der
lobbying Zahl
and der
whichvertretenen
contacts with
Transparency is also one of the key components A We
oflobby
anbelieve
effective thebetter
register Register
whichregulation
is is
nosomewhat
longer agenda. useful
voluntary, It in
isbut
essential
helping
whichto isthat
achieve
all stakeholders
backed thethe
by overall
force
individual
transparent,
European contacts and Very
wie Konsultationsbeitrge
Ombudsman: useful Ombudsman
gewichtet Brger
werden. Rechnung trgt. Fully should
agreelocal
Trilogues: These informalAllinter-institutional
European meetingsdo decisions
not eg.
between citizens
on
thetransparency
contacting
European their
Parliament, bethe MEP. Council of the European Union an
binding
In for EU institutions.
this context, Somewhat
we are pleased useful
that the Commission In the
However, meantime,
clearly the
supports before
register morealsoFully
a openness
As a result, a commitment to start negotiating agree
legally-binding
contains lobbya register
over-bureaucratic
and transparency, is introduced,
provisions,
not
legally-binding only lobby
during
and/oritthe
will
requ
register b
imp
Somewhat useful continue to introduce further
Fully incentives
agree
Access to documents: Reforms to bring the Access to Documents regulation 1049/2001 into line with the Treaty of Lisbon by w to encourage registration now.
We also call on the European SomewhatCommission
useful to publish Zur
In the Strkung
order
allmeantime,
public
to remedy der Transparenz
consultations
thesePartially
before andschlagen
aunintended all
agree
legally-binding new wir
effects, Reformen
proposals
lobby weregister
have des
immediately
made Transparenzregist
someafterconcrete
is introduced, their ado
it will bp
European Ombudsman: Somewhat All European useful
Ombudsman decisions on transparency Fully should
agree be binding for EU institutions.
Die Verstndlichkeit der Angaben im Register sollte dringend verbessert werd
unless continuous interesVery useful Partially agree
La prctica nos dice qu Very useful Die Vergleichbarkeit der Fully Datenagree im Register sollte dringend gestrkt werden. D
La prctica
Zur Strkung nosderdice qu Very useful
Transparenz und der Verlsslichkeit der Daten im Transparenzregister Fully agree sollten die EU-Institutionen ein integri
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Es ist sehr gut, dass die Somewhat EU-Institutionen
usefulviele ihrer DamitArbeitsunterlagen
Transparenzvorgaben ffentlich
FullySinn agree
zugnglich
machen,machen mssenund sie politische
fr alle Organisatione
Beratungen
La prctica nos dice qu Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
La prctica nos dice qu Very useful Fully agree
La prctica nos dice qu Very useful Fully agree
La prctica nos dice qu Very useful Fully agree
the Juncker commission Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Oui le registre de tran Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful I dont see any regular c Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
Difficult or impossible to Somewhat useful Fully agree
Die Europischen Institutionen
latively transparent Somewhat haben zwar einige wichtige Transparenzinstrumente
useful Partially agree eingefhrt, aber der Grad an Transparenz
1. Ein Schritt hierzu istSomewhat
latively transparent das verbindliche
useful Lobbyregister mit klaren Zugangsgrenzen, Partially agree Monitoring, Sanktionsmechanismen und
2. Auerdem drfen sich alle EU-Institutionen nur mit registrierten Lobbyisten
Fully agree und eine Liste der Treffen soll von der K
treffen
ghly transparent Very useful
3. Der Transparenz und Glaubwrdigkeit des EU-Gesetzgebungsprozesses wird oft durch die Trilog-Verhandlungen unterlau
The
4. Council of Ministers Very
Alle Entscheidungen des useful
Europischen Ombudsmanns mit Bezug zurFully agree
Transparenz sollten verbindlich fr alle EU-Institutio
Die Europischen Institutionen
Very haben
useful
5. Die Informationszugangs-Verordnung 1049/2001 zwar einige Thewichtige
1. Die objective
muss Transparenzinstrumente
Idee of improveFully
reformiert
eines Lobbyregisters
werden und agree an eingefhrt,
alsdie
Instrument, aberum
Errungenschaften derfrGrad anLissabon-Ver
Transparenz
des Transparenz
in der
1.
6. Ein
latively transparent Auch Schritt hierzu der
hinsichtlich istSomewhat
das verbindliche
laufenden useful Lobbyregister
Beschwerde- 2.undHierfrmit klarenmuss Zugangsgrenzen,Fully agree Monitoring,
Vertragsverletzungsverfahrenzeigt
das Lobbyregister rechtlich
sich die Sanktionsmechanismen
verbindlich
Europische (und Komission
nicht wie jetzt und
nichf
2.
7. Auerdem
Darber hinaus drfen sich
finden alle
Somewhat EU-Institutionen
zahlreiche useful
andere nicht nur mit registrierten
3. transparente
Die Vereinbarung Lobbyisten
Verhandlungen
hierfr
Fully und treffen
agree
durchersteund
die eine Liste der
Verhandlungen
Kommission Treffen
statt
fr ein soll von
wierechtlich
etwa der K
zu verbi
TTIP
3. Der Transparenz und Glaubwrdigkeit des EU-Gesetzgebungsprozesses wird oft durch die Trilog-Verhandlungen unterlau
The European institutionVery useful The Transparency Registe Partially agree
4. Alle Entscheidungen des Europischen Ombudsmanns mit Bezug zur Transparenz sollten verbindlich fr alle EU-Institutio
i.e.:
5. Commissioners and Very useful
Die Informationszugangs-Verordnung 1049/20011. Die muss Idee reformiert Fully und
eines Lobbyregisters
werden agree an alsdie
Instrument,
Errungenschaften um fr Transparenz
des Lissabon-Ver in der
latively transparent Somewhat useful
6. Auch hinsichtlich der laufenden Beschwerde-2.undHierfr Fully
Vertragsverletzungsverfahrenzeigt
muss das Lobbyregister agree rechtlich sich die verbindlich
Europische (und Komission
nicht wie jetzt nichf
latively transparent
7. Darber hinaus finden Somewhat
zahlreiche useful
andere nicht 3. transparente
Die Vereinbarung Verhandlungen Fully und
hierfr agree
durcherstedieVerhandlungen
Kommission statt fr ein
wierechtlich
etwa zu verbiTTIP
Somewhat useful Fully agree
Die europischen Institu Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterNo opinion
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Disagree
Be objective, do nor relaNot useful at all U do what u feel is ok. RDisagree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Sur tous les dossiers, le Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful No opinion
APRI develops its activit Very useful Fully agree
To improve transparency, we propose reforms of the Transparency Register i

The
Das comprehensibility of the information in the register should be improved in
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful TransparenzregisterFully agree
latively transparent
To strengthen the transparency Very useful
and reliability of data
The in comparability
the Transparency of the Partially
Register,
data in the agree
theregister
EU institutions
should beshould
strengthened.
provide an Unclear
integ
There is clearly a high l Somewhat useful This is certainly useful
There is significant room for improvement in the transparency of EU institutions. Firstly, Partially agreethe transparency register must be lega
Efforts
It is very
Certain are made
good
steps but
ofthat
thetheaccVery useful process
EU institutions
decision-making make manyhaveThe objectives
Inofserious
addition,
their the are
working EU sound
documents
transparency Fullyavailable
institutions
deficits, agree
should actively
to the Commission
in particular public
promoteandathatculture
political
Expert of
andcomplianc
consulta
Advisor
Somewhat useful
Lobbying is a booming growth industry in Brussels. EPHAEstimates
believes of that
how amany Fully
legally agreetransparency
lobbyists
biding address the EU register
institutions
would ingoBrussels
some way va
EPHA highlights that EU Very institutions
useful should be obliged
In ourto view,
implement
the Transparency
recommendations
Fully agree
Registerbyintends
the EUtoOmbudsman
ensure that andthe Union
withoutisdeop
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Partially agree
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all Das
Das TransparenzregisterDisagree
Transparenzregister kann grundstzlich als ntzliches Instrument zur Re
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all Das TransparenzregisterDisagree
Die Stadt Pforzheim begSomewhat useful Die Einbindung der lokalen, Fullyregionalen
agree und nationalen Belange durch ffentli
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all Das TransparenzregisterDisagree
Mehr Transparenz der EU Somewhat useful In den EU-Vertrgen ist Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful
In Transparency International's EU integrity reportThe Das TransparenzregisterPartially
(2014)
transparency
it is statedregister
that: ''(...)
is useful,agree
existing asEUit acknowledges
transparency rules the importance
are rendered of tran
me
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Transparency
The of theregister
idea of a lobby institutions
Somewhat
as ashould
tooluseful
to be an transparency
bring ongoing
A transparency
goal to forEUEUregister
policy makers.
lobbying on
Partially
isits own
very Aimportant.
agree
well
doesfunctioning
notChanges
enabletransparency
public
must scrutiny
resultregister
regarding
from can
this conb
A lobby register which is Somewhat
no longer voluntary,
useful but whichThe information
Das is mandatory,
Transparenzregisterabout
is essential
thFully agree
if all lobbyists
ist schlecht durchdacht.are Esto sign-up and if the registe
enthlt Ausnahmen fr g
In
Legroen
MEDEFTeilenestime arbeit
que lesNot useful at all
institutions europennes vonsontLobbybudgets
relativementscheint Disagree
- wenn man
transparentes Berichtenleurs
et reconnat einschlgiger Transparenz-
efforts continus d'amli
No opinion
Dans le cadre de la ralisation des tudes d'impact, Nous il serait
pensons opportun
que leque No
registre opinion
celles-ci
est plutt
soientutile
publies
pour en
atteindre
amont l'objectif
de la publication
politique
Les institutions devraientSomewhatgalementuseful
tre plus transparentes
Toutefois, lelors registre
de leurs
contient
ngociations
No opinion
trop de dispositions
trilatrales. administratives et/ou des ex
They may be transparentSomewhat useful The present
Das register is v Partially
Transparenzregister ist schlechtagree durchdacht. Es enthlt Ausnahmen fr g
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all von Lobbybudgets scheint Disagree
- wenn man Berichten einschlgiger Transparenz-
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Beaucoup d'informationsFully s agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
There is always place fo Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Die EU-Institutionen be Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
Das Transparenzregister ist ein ntzliches Instrument zur Regulierung der Int
latively transparent Very useful Zunchst pldieren wir fr Fully agree
klarere Leitlinien. Anforderungen, wie beispielswei
ot transparentDaimler
at all begrt die Transparenz Somewhat useful Most citizens
mit der die EU-Institutionen
Auch die Berechnung have neithe
vorangehen. No opinion
der Besonders
Mitgliedsbeitrge
die ffentliche
sollte imBereitstellung
Sinne der Vergleichbark
von Arbeits
ot transparentZur
at all
Strkung der Transparenz Very useful
und der Verlsslichkeit
Auerdemder Daten sollteimvermehrt Fully agree
Transparenzregister
sicher gestellt sollten
werden,
die dass
EU-Institutionen
die Qualitt ein
derintegri
Regis
Somewhat useful Fully agree
Der Abstand von BrsselNot useful at all Sofern Details aus Verh Fully agree
A balance is important b Very useful Fully agree
Secondo la mia percezione Somewhat useful Dipende da come viene u Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful the register has become Fully agree
It is difficult to know Somewhat useful Fully agree
Sono relativamente traspSomewhat useful Purch il regolamento chDisagree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Council Working Parties Very useful The Register should be m Fully agree
The discussion on transpSomewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Parliament in general lead to far greater transparency.
- The We
register
also should
see thatbecome
severalthe
member
centralstates
hub ofare
lobby transparency. This mea

currently putting in place mandatory lobby registers


upgraded
or are otherwise
to includeincreasing
other information,
transparency
such as
andmembers of expert groups, or

the EU needs to make substantial progress in order


public
not consultations,
to fall further behind.
and lists of lobby meetings at the Commission, among o
Das Transparenzregister ist schlecht durchdacht. Es enthlt Ausnahmen fr g
TIs recent report Lobbying
latively transparent Not in Europe:
useful at allHidden Influence, In
Auch time, diethePrivileged
Transparency
Offenlegung Accessvon Register
Disagree the first-ever
Lobbybudgets shouldscheint allow users - wenn to man trackBerichten
who has influe einsc
Die Arbeit des Europis Very useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
comprehensive assessment of lobbying across 19orEuropean law in what countries
way. In and shortthree it shouldEU institutions
provide a legislative footprint.
Wir sind der Meinung, d Somewhat useful Unserer
Das Meinung nach isFully
Transparenzregister agree durchdacht. Es enthlt Ausnahmen fr g
ist schlecht
In
The groen
shows EUthat Teilen
rules arbeit
institutions already
regulating Notlobby
usefulcontact
achieve ata all
highare level
often ofvon
The
TIs Lobbybudgets
transparency
comparability
missing
recent orreport
deficient. scheint
byLobbying ByDisagree
publishing
of data - in
shouldwenn
working
assessing be
Europe:man Berichten
improved.
65 documents
Hidden
indicators einschlgiger
Especially
and
Influence, online with Transparenz-
consultations.
Privilegedregards to fund
Access H
Also with regards to impact Somewhat
assesments useful there is room Secondly, for improvements
including both onFully
the transparency,
number
agree
Der GDV setzt sich fr Transparenz bei der politischen Interessenvertretung of people
specifically involved with as
how the the
amount
final reports
of FTE
covering transparency, integrity
latively transparent Very and equality of access,
useful EU Member TI calculated States that have the average specificscore lobbying for the regulations (Austria, France, I
DI welcomes the European institutions effort to become more transparent,Fully and agree acknowledge the Commissions commitment to
latively transparent
The efforts to create transparency Very useful are part of broader Im
TheRahmen Register
commitments des
is abestehen
somewhat
to reform Transparenzregisters
Partially EU
useful agree
policy instrument
making; here todes EU-Parlaments
support
the Better
the Commissions
Regulation und der ag
quality of lobbying regulation
latively transparent Very in the three core EUPoland,
useful institution Slovenia
is onlyand 36%the compared
United
Fully agree Kingdom)
to international have all opted for a register as the
DI welcomes that the Commission supports openness We are and however
transparency. concerned The about
introductioncertainofbureaucratic
a revised and provisions
more inclusive and disclos impa
The EUwe
Finally, institutions are relatively
ask the Commission Somewhat transparent
for the
usefulswift publication1.
compared
Please Die gleichzeitige
Transparency tosee
of EU2.1
new member
proposals,
for an Verffentlichung
International states,
elaboration. supports
Partially
after as shown
adoption
agree der
thebybyKategorien
viewTransparency
thethat College Vollzeitquivalent
lobby ofregisters
Internationals
Commissioners. are essenti(VZ)
exten
best practise. The European Commission performed approach,
2. order
In best
Die ofrequiring
Einfhrung
to the three,
increase von lobbyist
theachieving registration
De-Minimis-Schwellen,
usefulness 53%, the whileand,
following the inca. most
25%,
actions cases,
wre
should aratsam.
periodic
be report
Gleiche
taken:
There is still a lack of Very useful Transparency register woPartially agree
Transparency
It is fair to say International
that thescored welcomes
Scottish andand UKthe transparency
institutions -3.Coverage
Die Vorgaben
are initiative
among oftheallofzurtheKostenschtzung
lobbyists
most European
transparentby theCommission,
register
in the
lassen Some
EU,
erheblichen
which
both organisations,
in makes
terms
Interpretationsspie
strong
of thelaw waycommitme
firms
theyan pil
latively transparent
European Parliament die Very useful
37% the Council We
However,
of certainly
the EU allaof appreciate
meagre
these Fully
the agree
registers broad scope in that it register
covers everyone
Der GDV untersttzt EU-Institutionen mit seiner umfassenden
- Greatly improve the registers
19%.
Branchenerfahrung
data This
quality areperformance
ofinadequate.
und
the Expertise
register. isMany
very
While ofthe
jederzeit.the lobbying
Der GDV isrelated
ist tem
based o
ot transparentWhen
at all looking at specific Somewhat aspects of useful
transparency, Problematisch
- the
The EUregister
institutions ist insbes.
should often
becomeFully
das
lag agree
mgliche
behind
the central
what double
hub
is already
of counting:
lobby done Die
transparency.
in Mehrfachberec
some member
This mea s
Having said that we considers
have found over the overwith 20 that years thatin COSLA has had a hub
presence in Brussels that this for good practice has
disappointing
Der EU-Institutionen
Die mangler if one
benhed i f Somewhat
haben that
in den Brussels,
useful
letzten Jahren However,
In over
Registeret
wichtige
Oxfam exist
time,25,000the the
supportsgiver
Schritte register
Europe
lobbyists,
ikke
Transparency emust
are,
in Richtung
the view is tothe be
varying
Partially mandatory
mehr
Register
that lobby ofdegrees,
agreelobbying
Transparenz
should
registers
and
allow while
flawed
on
arethe
weunfit
or
gesetzt.
users
essential toappreciate
Dazu
track purpose.
zhlen
who
in allowing
that organ
u.a.There
hascitizens
influedie
TIs recent report Lobbying Somewhat
in Europe: usefulHidden Es
Influence,
TIs
- itlevelmuss
recent
can reveal bedacht
Privileged
report the werden,
Lobbying
Access
lobby Fully dass
pressures in agree
the nicht
Europe: jede
first-ever
on Hidden von Verbnden
comprehensive
decision-makers Influence, and mit
PrivilegedMitgliedsbeitrg
assessment
help Access
to plans, of
ensureforw lob
tha
Furthermore,
We appreciate
continent. Thecompared
that EU
need to COSLA
for officials
more are work
robust requiredat national
transparency to declare
The
weak need
provisionsall , their
work
foracross
implementation ofmandatory
the
ameetings allEUand
EU institutions
with system
organisations
institutions
lack isis
with
of agree highly
enforcement sanctions
and
further predictable
self-employed
of is heightened
existing with
rules. work
individuals.
by
The the factHow
registers tha
We believe that the Transparency Somewhat useful
Register represents -it
Since canan illustrate
its adequate
inception, lobbying
first
the step Partially
imbalances
Transparencyin ensuring inRegister
terms ofhas
the transparency staff had numbers
a of theand
significant Europeanspending
impactins on
The fundamental problem Somewhat
of the EU useful
is that there - it can
are so substantially
many actors reduce
involved,Fully unethical
agree
so many or unscrupulous
issues with so lobbying.
much complexity, as we
We are alsobyconcerned
underlined the fact that by EUthe institutions,
fact that junior beingofficials
We also
perceived
definitionssuchbelieve heads that oftheunit information
and ofisdesk officers
registrants are are not required
requiredreporting to
to disclose
declare their
is onp
Transparency should be Somewhat a useful However, as limiting
the removed
present the scope
from
register
Disagree
citizens,the register,
are
highly-flawed in extranon-mandatory
and serious changes and/or
must resu
However
Finally,
need tothe need
regain to fundamentally
EU visibility,
institutions Somewhat
trust and and
should useful
substantially
address
legitimacy. theFor lack Under
this
use improve
ofreason,
of this
cross-referencing
a
inaccessibleEUas
mandatory it isor
institutions essential
register Disagree
between
non-user- with
need to ensure
agendas
sanctions,
to
friendly public
and
be transparency
data the legitimacy
meetings
issue
formats, ofandas to
reliable
they
weakthedo EU
financial
ornot decision
tend
absent data to
ov
Recommendations:
Somewhat useful Partially agree
The Federation of Enterprises in Belgium believes-We Coverage
that believe
the European of allRegister
the lobbyists is by
institutions the
somewhat register
are quite useful Some
transparent
in helping organisations,
and to achieve
acknowledges lawthefirms
overallthe anc
champions, leading by example. Somewhat useful sanctions.
- Greatly improve the data Partially
qualityagree of the register. While the register is based o
ot transparentInatthis
all context,
Although the EU weinstitutionsVeryhave
are pleased useful
thatintroduced
the Commission some - Lobbytransparency
However, clearly organizations
the
supports measures,
register morealso Fully
should Oxfam
openness agree
receive
contains maintains
better
over-bureaucratic
and guidance
that thereon
transparency, is how
much
provisions,
not onlytoduring
that
filland/or
incould
informa
therequ be
imp
ot transparent at all Very useful - The register should becomePartially the agree
central hub of lobby transparency. This mea
The EU institutions have introduced some important transparency measures. However, there is much that could be improved a
When looking
call onatAs specific Somewhat
aspects of useful
transparency, Transparency
-FOEE
the
Inorder
time,
EU institutions
the International
Transparency oftenFully lag supports
Register
behind
agree the view that lobby registers are essenti
We
Lobby also register: the European
mentioned Commission
elsewhere thereto publish
shouldIn all
behaspublic
ato remedy consultations
legally-binding
long-supported these unintended
and
register
the all
idea withofshould
newwhat
effects, is allow
a proposals
comprehensive
lobby already
we users
have
register done
asto
immediately
made ain
disclosure track
some
tool who
after
to member
has
concrete
their
requirement
bring influ
ado
trans sp
Somewhat useful In order to increase the usefulness
Partially the
agree following actions should be taken:
Proactive meetings transparency: All EU institutions Forshould FOEE,only a lobby meetregister with registered
which is no lobbyists
longer (or voluntary,
those who but fall whichunder is backed
the thre
The EU institutions are relatively transparent compared -As Coverage to the
EUof member
all lobbyiststostates, by
a as the shown
register byto Transparency
Some organisations,
of theInternationals
Somewhat useful meetings Some of information Fully agree lawUnionfirms exten an
Trilogues: These informal inter-institutional abetween
result, wethe wish
European see Parliament,
commitment the Council
start negotiating Europeana legally-bindin an
- Greatly improve the data quality of the register. While the register is based
TTIP:
Die The European
EU-Institutionen Commission
bemhenSomewhat should
sich, ihreuseful follow the In the
European
meantime, Ombudsmans
before Fully
a legally-binding
recommendations
agree lobby and
registerprovide is introduced,
full transparency it will bo
Transparency International welcomes theAktivitten
transparency - The weitgehend
register
initiativeshould offen
of thezu legen. the
become
European Nicht nur Pressemitteilungen,
Commission,
central hub of whichlobby makes
transparency. strong commitme This mea
ot transparentauch
at allbeschlossene TexteNot unduseful
Entwrfe at allsowie Details it's not
In time, ber working
the TransparencyDisagree
Abstimmungen sind
Register ffentlich
should zugnglich
allow users meist
to track who has influe
sogar
Instytucje
When in mehreren
A obrigatoriedade
looking Sprachen.
do regVery
UE wprowadziy
at specific aspectsEs
useful
kilka gibt
wanych allerdings
mechanizmw
of transparency, auch TIs Aspekte
Fundamental.
EUzwikszajcych
therecent des europischen
institutions
report Lobbying
often Partially
przejrzysto
laginbehind agree
Europe: ich
what funkcjonowania,
Hidden is already Influence, co
donePrivileged jednakmember
in some nie ozna
Access s
Entscheidungsfindungsprozesses,
latively transparent Very usefuldie an mangelnder Transparenz leiden.Fully So zum agree Beispiel die politischen
Verhandlungen
Rejestr
TIs recent report zwischen
Przejrzystoci:Lobbying Europischen
rejestr inpowinien
Somewhat Europe: useful Parlament,
by
Hidden prawnie
Influence, EU-Kommission
wicy (tj. wprowadzony
Privileged und Rat
Access mittels
Partially na
thepodstawieTrilogverfahren,
first-ever
agree obowizujcego
comprehensive die powszechnie
assessment of lobakt
weitesgehend unter Ausschluss der ffentlichkeit stattfinden. Weder ist bekannt, wann die einzelnen Treffen
Concernant les ngocaitiVery useful Einige bei krasse Flle Partially
habenSitzungen agree
bei mir zubesprochen dem Eindruck gefhrt, da die eingetrag
in welcher Besetzung
Przejrzysto spotka:stattfinden,
przedstawiciele noch wszystkich
welche Themen Pomys
instytucji naden UE
rejestr jeweiligen
powinni jako narzdzie
spotyka si
wspierajce
wycznie werden
przejrzysto
z zarejestrowanymi undlobbingu lobbystam
w ins
UERe je
Nach
welchemeiner Erfahrung
Ergebnisse erzielthNot useful Gleichzeitig
werden. at all Gelegentlich
vergrert gibt
die Nutzung es auch Disagree
dieses Personen/
intransparenten Organisationen, Verfahrens die ihren Eintrag
latively transparent
das
CECCM demokratische
supports Defizit
the Somewhat
der
Commissions EU und useful
reduziert
Better somit
Regulation das
agenda,ffentliche theza recent Partially
Vertrauen agree
innaley
die
Inter-Institutional demokratischeAgreement (IIA) on Better Law-ma
Rozmowy trjstronne (eng. trilogues): nieformalne Z spotkania
tych wzgldw midzyinstytucjonalne
niezbdne midzy uzna Parlamentem
wprowadzenie Europejskim,
obligatoryjnego Rad U r
ghly transparent
Verfasstheit
We also urgeder theEU. Der Very
Commission useful
gesetzgeberische
to promote aMeinungsfindungsprozess
clear, simple and uniform policy muss Fully agree
transparent
of publishing und fr die on stakeholder meetings
information
ffentlichkeit
latively transparent
We believe
Dostp nachvollziehbar
that
do dokumentw:in someVery areas
naley erfolgen.
useful
the Fr zakres
den ffentlichen
EU decision-making-process
poszerzy Das Transparenzregister
Wobowizywania
zwizku Rckhalt
z tymcould von
rozporzdzenia
odpowiednie Gesetzgebung
ist eintransparent.
be Partially
more gutes
agree
instytucje Instrument,
nr 1049/2001 ist es
The
powinny wichtig,
um die
trilogies
Parlamentu dass
zobowiza Ttigkeiten
process siand
Europejskiego von
the func
do rozpocz Inte
iR
die Allgemeinheit die Mglichkeit Somewhat hat, nachverfolgen
useful und
Thezu der knnen,
ffentlichkeit
Transparency welche einen
registe Institution
Partially berlick welche
agree berPosition
diese Ttigkeit einnimmt. zu verschaffen. Es i
Da der politische
Europejski Rzecznik Willensbildungsprozess
Praw Somewhat
Obywatelskich: usefulhufig
wszystkie zum unkomplizierte
Wanym Zeitpunkt
decyzje desMglichkeit,
jestEuropejskiego
aby informellen
przed umagree
wprowadzeniem
Fully Trilogs
Rzecznika eine ffentliche
gerade
dotyczce erst Kontrolle
obligatoryjnego, begonnen
przejrzystoci ber
prawnie die Interaktion
powinnywicego by w
hat, wre in diesem Stadium ein erhhtes Ma anInteressenvertreter Transparenz notwendig. herzustellen. Insbesondere, Man sollte da diederErwartungen
informelle an das Transpa
Det r ur demokratisk sySomewhat useful Utifrn ett anvndarperspFully agree
Trilog den Gesetzgebungsprozess abkrzt, d.h. ein berfrachten.
ZurTeil der Lesungen
Strkung DasTransparenz
der Offenlegen
und Diskussionen der Aufgaben
schlagen imwirEuropischen
und Finanzmittel
Reformen von Interessenv
des Transparenzregist
latively transparent
The degreeund
Parlament of transparency Veryvaries
im Rat entfallen, useful
undbetween the three
die ffentlichkeit We
oderunderstand
EU institutions.
hierdurch
kirchlichen that
keine
Reprsentanzen
oder Fully
regulating
In the case
nur agree
lobbying
ofkann
geringe the Mglichkeiten
Council,
keineis meant transparency
as hat,
vollstndige regulating andlobbying
Transparenz access und to
actiin
R
ot transparentInat all
the case of the Somewhat
Commission, more
sich einzubringen oder zumindest zu informieren.Die useful
information As
on noted
its activities
berregulierung above,
Zu Verstndlichkeit
begren wren is toavailable,
achieve
hingegen Partially
es Angaben
daher, its
although
fhrtwenn agree
stated
nur as
aims noted the above
transparency the information
register should
on vario s
der imzu Texte,
mehrBeschlsse
Register Brokratie,
sollte dringend und
lst aber nicht das
verbessert werd zu
The Parliament
Vorschlge is by far
frhzeitig undthe
Somewhat
most transparent
unkomplizierter useful online institution.
Finally, more
auffindbar
wirklich However,
Klarheit
wren. information
zu there are
schaffen, Disagree
does still not
many
bedarf necessarily
es activities
auch mean
thatSelbstverpflichtung
einer aremore difficulttransparency.
to locateder on
Bett th
Po
Zur Strkung der Transparenz schlagen wir Reformen des Transparenzregist
Somewhat useful Gesetzgebungsverfahren
Die Vergleichbarkeit
1. Die Verstndlichkeit der Partially
Daten
derderAngaben
ffentlichkeit
imagree
Register umfassend
sollte
im Register solltezugnglich
dringend zu
gestrktverbessert
dringend macheD
werden.
latively transparent
Zur Very useful Fully agree
Der Strkung
DZV untersttztder Transparenz
die Better und der Verlsslichkeit
Regulation Agenda2.derDie der Vergleichbarkeit
Daten im Transparenzregister
EU-Kommission, das der Daten im
unlngst Register
soll-ten die
verabschiedete sollteEU-Institutionen
dringend gestrkt
Inter-Institutional einAgrrem
integr
werd
Zur
Es Strkung gut,der TranspSomewhat
dass die EU-Institutionen useful viele ihrer Damit
3. Transparenzvorgaben
Smtliche legitimen Interessenvertreter sollten in den EU-Entscheidungsprozess einbezogen werden und Zugang zu den EU-g
ist sehr Arbeitsunterlagen
Transparenz-Vorgaben Fully
ffentlich Sinn
agree
mssen machen,
zugnglich fr alle mssen
machen
Organisationen sie
und fr alle
politische Organisatione
gleichermaen
Beratungen
Wir empfehlen der EU-Kommission Somewhat useful ferner, klare, einfache und einheitlicheFully Vorgaben agree zur Verffentlichung von Informationen zu
latively transparent
Regelungen, die einzelne, Somewhat useful
legitime Interessenvertreter diskriminieren, sollten Partially abgelehnt agreewerden.
Schlielich
EU sind wir der
decision-making Auffassung,
Somewhat
processes useful
dass in einzelnen
are characterised Das
by aTransparenz-Register
Bereichen
fairly high degree des EU-Entscheidungsprozesses
ofPartially
transparency, agree given the ein rules hheres
in placeMa an Transp
to guide in th
Very useful Very useful however,
EU institutions are improving their transparency as a way to strengthen the legislative process and the quality of the legislation inPartially agree
To improve the quality ofSomewhat the legislative usefulprocess, Impact We do Assessments
believe that the studies
RNo opinion should be launched well before any new legislat
ot transparent at all Very useful No opinion
Leitlinien fr die Umsetzung des Transparenzregisters vertraut sind. Der Infor
tatschlichen personellen Aufwand im Zusammenhang mit EU-Interessenver
Vollzeitquivalente deutlich hher als bei der Angabe der beteiligten Persone
We chose no opinion option, as it is not possibleZahl to evaluate
der beteiligtenall of thePersonen" institutions together. und
gestrichen Standards
aktiv gegenthey are eineapplying
irrefhrende differ
aus dem Transparenzregister durch Dritte vorgegangen werden.
According to the report entitled Lobbying in Europe, published by Transparency International in April 2015 , Council is the ins
The EU institutions According to member
latest data only around 75% of business related organisations aD
Transparency is notarejustrelatively
about knowing transparentaboutcomparedTransparency to to a)EU
Die Vergleichbarkeit
access people International
but states,
der
b) Daten
access supports
asimtoshown theby
Register
documents viewTransparency
thatdringend
sollte
and lobby
c) the registers
Internationals
gestrkt
traceability are ofessenti
werden. exten
those d
These discrepancies are harmful to the quality of In law
Vorgaben making
order to and
increase
wie zur shouldthe
Berechnung lead
usefulnessto serious
von the changes.
following
Mitgliedsbeitrgen It is
actions essential
zu should
vermeiden.that
be the
taken:
Zur legisla
Sch
The degree of transparency Verydiffers
usefulbetween the three The TR institutions
is a useful andtool theirPartially
advisoryagree bodies. This applies also to the Commissio
Transparency International welcomes the transparency In our opinion
- Coverage initiativeof all the TR European
oflobbyists
the should bybe the made
Commission,
register mandatory.
Some which Anmakeseffective
organisations, system
strong lawcommitmeto mot
firms an
It
Otherdepends the changes
positive Europeanto Somewhat
Cthe transparencyuseful level mssen It istheuseful
ofGreatly
Organisationen
if it is a
EUimprove
institutions should
unter
Disagree hohem
include:
brokratischem Aufwand Informationen
-verifizierbar sind. the data
Mitgliedsbeitrge quality of the
sollten register.
daher While
nur dann the register
verffentlicht is basedwerd o
latively transparent
-
When making
looking allatofspecific Very
the decisions
aspects useful
onoftransparency
transparency,of -It should
European
the
The EU be
register ensured
Ombudsman
institutions
should that
often
become Fully
all
binding
lag agree
co-legislators
behind
the on
centralthe
what EU
hubapply
is institutions;
already
of the
lobby same
done standards
transparency.
in some and
member
This tha
mea s
einem
Um dieweit berwiegenden
Transparenz grundstzlich Anteil zur Finanzierung der Verbandsaktivitten desb
latively transparent
- improving the transparency Somewhat useful negotiations
of trilogue In time, and
the facilitating
Transparency des the
Fully
access agree
Register tozu the strken,
documents schlagenthattowere wir eine Reformdurin
discussed
The EU institutions have introduced some important Aufgabenbereich
transparency measures but theyshould
Transparenzregisters remainallow fallen. users
unsufficientDarber track
and who
hinaus
thie has
still influe
rissollten die
a stro
-TIs recent
ImprovingreporttheLobbying
transparency
Somewhat of submission
useful received
An
TIseffective by the enforcement
European Commission:
Fully
system agree includingall submission
sanctions should be made
put in public,
place lobs
the lobby register should be in Europe:
a legally-bindingHiddenregister,
Influence, recent
Compliance-Kultur
Zum with
Privileged
report
comprehensive
Teil sollte
Lobbying
Access
frdern.
die Verstndlichkeit
Es
intheEurope:
disclosureistfirst-ever
darauf Hiddencomprehensive
Influence,
hinzuwirken,
requirements,
verschiedener anddass
Angaben activePrivileged
assessment Access
Registereintrge
immonitoring,
Transparenzre
of enf
The
All EU Council
institutions EU is Somewhat
of theshould less meet useful
onlytransparent than theTransparenzregister-Sekretariats
with registered The European
current Commission
lobbyists, lobby
lists ofregister
meetings Partially
and the agree
European
stehen,
is highly-flawed
should d.h.Parliament.
be pro-actively
and die Working
bereitgestellten
serious published
changes Parties
Information
byshould
Commission and
be ad
The European Commission Very could
useful also improve
The informal inter-institutional meetings (trilogues)Grundstzlich transparency
vollstndig,
The between
lobby registerin
aktuellthe
the sollte comitology
Europeanund
should
die Fully
nicht procedure/secondary
agree
irrefhrend
Parliament,
be legally binding,
Vergleichbarkeit sind.
the der
Council Das
so that
Daten legislation.
gegenwrtige
of im
the
allTransparenzregister
lobbyists
Europeanare Ungleichgew
Unionto sign-u
and dr
nel caso TTIP NON Zur Strkung der schadet
Vergleichbarkeit, Transparenz demthe schlgt
politischen LHGZiel Reformen
der des Transparenzregist
Transparenz und fhrt zuener
Reforms to bring thesono Veryto
Access useful
Documents regulation therefore 1049/2001
Grundstzlich we call into
the line
sollten diePartially
Commission
with agree
Treaty
EU-Institutionen to startofnegotiating
Lisbon
eine by
aktive widening
aCompliance-Kultur
legally-binding
its scope lobby
to
frd
Zur
All Strkung
ZurEuropean der
der Transparenz
Strkung Ombudsman Somewhat
allgemeinen und der
decisions
TransparenzonVerlsslichkeit
useful und inderer,
transparency theder
InAnbetracht dieDaten
should sich
meantime, be
der den
im Transparenzregister
bindingLeitlinien
before
Verfgbarkeit for
Fully entsprechend
a legally-binding
EU agree
institutions.
vonim solltenverhalten.
lobby
verlsslichen die EU Institutionen
register
Daten imis introduced,
EU-Transparenzreeinitintegri
will b
Europische Die Verstndlichkeit der Angaben Register sollte dringend verbessert werd
Wir begrenKommission,
zudem, dass das
die Europische
Somewhat useful Parlament
EU-Institutionen einen
Zudem und
Groteil sonstige
sollten ihrer EU-Einrichtungen
Transparenzrichtlinien
Arbeitsunterlagen
Fully agree ffentlich zur Verfgung
gleichermaen zugnglichstellen
fr alle machen
Organisationen
und politis
There
und havemit
direkt been
dempositive developmentsverknpfen.
Transparenzregister to try to increase the transparency of the
Damit Transparenzvorgaben SinnEU institutions.
machen, mssen sie fr alle Organisatione
Il s'agit d'voquer le fa Very useful Die Vergleichbarkeit der Partially Daten im agree
Register sollte dringend gestrkt werden. D
Nichtregierungsorganisationen gehren genauso verpflichtet, przise Informa
The
Zur EU
Transparency policy
Strkung dermaking
should env
Very
Transparenz
also be useful
und
tightly
Es ist sehr gut, dass die EU-Institutionen viele ihrerder Verlsslichkeit
linked to the The
better Transparency
der
Zuwendungsgeber Daten
regulation
Arbeitsunterlagenund im Registe
agenda. Fully
Transparenzregister
ffentlich Opennessagree
die jeweiligezugnglich and sollten die
transparency
Hhemachen EU-Institutionen
der Zuwendung und is needed ein
throughout
im Transparenzre integri
Es ist sehrBeratungen
politische gut, dass die Somewhat
EU-Institutionen
per Webstream useful viele ihrer
bertragen. Damit
bloe Arbeitsunterlagen
AllerdingsTransparenzvorgaben
Auflistung gibt es ffentlich
FullySinn
vonVerbesserungsbedarf,
Zuwendungsgebern agree
zugnglich
machen, machen
wie mssen
z.B. und
Stiftungen
bei der sie politische
fr
etc., alledie
Organisatione
Beratungen
keine Klarhe
Also the trilogues
zeitnahen between
Verffentlichung. Somewhat
the threesollten
Zudem useful
EU institutions Theshould
die EU-Institutionen
schafft Register be Transparenz
keine more
isihrsomewhat
transparent.
Vorgehen Partially
und
begrnden, agreeeine
belsst fallsbetrchtliche
sie von eigenen Gruppe von Organis
Vorgaben
Overall, EU abweichen.
institutions are Somewhat useful However
very transparent. den sie theselbst
transparencyfr andere inFully
fordert.
the agree process and the Regulatory committees
trilogue
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparentESTA at all would also recommend Very usefula consistent application of the Commission Fully policyagree of publishing information on stakeholder meet
Somewhat useful The
Als Kommune begren wir die Bemhungen der EU-Insititutionen, mehr Transparenz Transparency registe P artially agreezu schaffen. Sehr positiv sind z. B. die
In groen
Im TeilenVoice"
Portal "Your arbeit sollten
Not useful at all von Konsultationen
alle Formen DasTransparenzregister
Ein Transparenzregister
aufgefhrt werden, Disagree
mit dem d. Zielh. und
auchder "gezielte
Funktion, Konsulationen"
die Lobbyarbeit bestimm
zu re
Die Verhandlungen ber Somewhat die Ausgestaltung useful des knftigen Weiter istTransparenz-Registers
es unser Anliegen, Fullydass agree
sollten
Konsultationsbeitrge
ffentlich stattfinden. vonAuch Kommunen,ist noch ihr ke
Access to documents on Very
i useful A mandatory register
The EU institutions have introduced some important transparency measures although transparency varies between them. The wou F ully agree
EU institutions are compVery useful The transparency register Fully agree
See attached
Lobby register:written su Somewhat
As mentioned usefulthere should
elsewhere SeeStrkung
Zur attached written
be a legally-binding
der su Partially
Transparenz register, agree
with comprehensive
schlagen wir Reformen disclosure in folgenden requiremen
Kernbere
latively transparent Very useful Die Verstndlichkeit der Angaben Fully agree im Register sollte dringend verbessert werd
Proactive
Es ist sehrmeetings
gut, dasstransparency:
di Somewhat Alluseful
EU institutions The
Umshould idea ofonly
Transparenz a lobby meetzu register
withFully
strken, registered
as a toolNichtregierungsorganisationen
sollten
agree lobbyists,
to bring transparency
lists of meetings to EU should
lobbying be pro
verpflicht is
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Trilogues: These informal inter-institutional meetings A lobbybetween register the which
European is noParliament,
longer voluntary,
thethe Council
but
thatwhich of the isregisters
European
backed are by Union
the force
an
ot transparentThe EU institutions
at all are relatively
Somewhat transparent
useful compared Transparency
it must to beEU made member
International
widelystates, kn supports
Partially as shown
agree by
viewTransparencylobby Internationals essenti
exten
In order to increase the usefulness the following actions should be taken:
IAccess
believetothat they are hReforms
documents: Somewhat useful
to bring the Access Fully agree
Transparency International welcomes the transparency-As to
a result,
CoverageDocuments
initiativea commitment
of all regulation
oflobbyists
the European to1049/2001
by start negotiating
theCommission,
register into line
Some a with
legally-binding
which the Treaty
organisations,
makes of
lobby
strong Lisbon
law register
commitme
firms byanw
latively transparent Somewhat useful It doesn't show any
- Greatly improve the data quality activFully agree of the register. While the register is based o
ot transparentEuropean
at all looking
When at specific Very
Ombudsman: All
aspects useful
European Ombudsman
of transparency, In
- the
Thethe
decisions
EU meantime,
register on
institutions transparency
should before
often
become Fully
alag agree
legally-binding
should
behind
the central be binding
what lobby
hub ofregister
is alreadyfor
lobby EUdone institutions.
is introduced,
transparency.
in some member Thisit will
meabs
Somewhat useful Fully agree
In time, the Transparency Register should allow users to track who has influe
Cela dpend
TIs recent d'une
report institution
Lobbying
SomewhatinEurope:
l'autre:
usefulHidden Influence,TIs recent Privileged
report LobbyingAccess Partially
intheEurope:
first-ever
agree Hidden comprehensive
Influence, Privileged assessment Access
of lob
- L'Eurogroupe et le Conseil de l'UEuseful
ne sont absolument pas transparent: No il est difficile d'avoir accs aux documents de runio
latively transparent Somewhat opinion
- Le Parlement est trs transparent, mme si des amliorations sont encore possibles (par exemple, mise en place d'un outil r
latively transparent
- La Commission a fait des Very usefulmais son niveau de transparence n'estFully
efforts, agree satisfaisant. A titre d'exemple, tous ses f
pas encore
latively transparent Somewhat useful It needs
De plus, de nombreux cabinets de Commissaires ne respectent pas leurs obligations, to become comp Fully agree et "oublient" de publier la liste de leurs r
ot transparent at all Very useful Potrebbe non essere sufPartially agree
La pratiques inter-institutionnelles
Somewhatdes useful
trilogues manque Il s'agit aussi d'un outil cruellement
trs Fully
de transparence:
agree le public ne sait pas o et quand
latively transparent Very useful Transparency
In order to strengthen International supports
transparency
Fully agree we thepropose
view that lobby registers
reforms in three core are essenti
areas.
In order to increase the usefulness the following actions should be taken:
latively transparent Very useful Uradnik oz. Politik mora Fully agree
In order to avoid any misinterpretation and reputational damage by misleadin
latively transparent Very useful - Coverage of all lobbyists Fullyby theagree register Some organisations, law firms an
ot transparentInatorder
all to strengthen transparencySomewhat useful sam
and reliabilityComparability register
of data provided brezof datavsebin
in the Partially
inTransparency
the Register agree should
Register, urgently
all EUbe Institutions
improved.should Unclear esta
ru
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful - Greatly improve the data Fully agree
quality of the register. While the register is based o
LUEL salue that
It is positive favorablement les efforts
the EU institutions
Somewhat dploys
publish
useful many par In les
oforder
their institutions
working
to transparency europennes
documents Fully
requirements
and pour
agreemake accrotre
politicalleur
providing transparence.
consultations
actual transparency,accessible they vianeo
The EU institutions
EU institutions are relatively
are compVery transparent compared
useful -InTheorder register
tofor
EUthe member
should
registry become
states,Fullyas theshown
agree centralbyhub Transparency
of lobby transparency. Internationals Thisexten mea
En effet, la transparence est un lment cl dune meilleure efficacit de la rglementation. Il est essentiel que toutes les parti
by operating with secretiSomewhat useful I haven't considered usi No opinion
Transparency International welcomes the transparency In time,initiative
the Transparencyof the European Register Commission,
should allow whichusers makes
to track strong
whocommitme
has influe
latively transparent Very useful
LUEL salue la volont de la Commission europenne davoir plus de transparence, Fully agreenon seulement au cours du processus d'
latively transparent
When looking at specific Very aspects usefulof transparency,TIs therecent
EU institutions
report Lobbying oftenFully agree
laginbehind
Europe: whatHidden
is already
Influence,donePrivileged
in some member Accesss
Il est essentiel que les politiquesVery useful menes au niveau Le registre
europen desoienttransparen cohrentesFully agree et les analyses dimpact, qui doivent tre suff
latively transparent
TIs recent report Lobbying Not in useful
Europe:at allHidden Influence, However,Privileged all of these Access Partially
registers the agree
arefirst-ever
inadequate. comprehensive
Many of theassessment lobbying related of lobl
Somewhat useful Partially agree
CIP
- mssenbelieves that the European
Sanktionen auch angewendet institutions are quite transparent
werden.
and acknowledges the continuous efforts made to increase their own
transparency.
- mssen alle EU-Beamten, bei denen Lobbyarbeit Zurstattfindet,
Strkung in der dieTransparenz
Regel einbezogen schlagen wir Reformen
werden, dass sich des Transparenzregist
nur registrierte Lobb
Das Forum Umwelt und Entwicklung untersttzt die Idee eines Lobbyregister
Transparency
- mssen auchisAbgeordnete also one of the sichkey components
diese Regel auferlegen.of an
Die effective betterder Angaben im Register sollte dringend verbessert werd
Verstndlichkeit
regulation agenda. It is essential that all stakeholders Fr affected
das Forum byUmwelt und Entwicklung ist es essentiell, langfristig ein Lobby
Transparency
possible EU couldshould
action be i Very have useful
the opportunity to Yes
give - but
their
Diestndigen it should
views
Vergleichbarkeit beder
about co Partially
Daten agree
imsowie
Register sollte dringend gestrkt werden. D
- muss das Register auch fr den Rat inklusive der Vertretungen gelten fr alle EU-Agenturen und Behrden.
ghly transparent
initiatives
To be fully and the
transparent,evidence Very
the anduseful
rules
Zur Strkung der Transparenz und der Verlsslichkeit information
on transparency that isLa mise
used
should toen
include
der Daten
Als Ergebnis place
support the et la
them,
CouncilmFully
not
im Transparenzregister
wrden andagree
wir uns wnschen, all Permanent
sollten
wenn die Representations.
man EU-Institutionen
sich verpflichten A requiremen
ein integri
wrde V
only
- mssen at an auch
Furthermore, early stage
whilst when
it is policytoconcepts
possible
Somewhat
Rechtsanwaltskanzleien gain
useful sichare
access not
to yet Transparenzvorgaben
Despite
certain
Damit
eintragen precisely
requirements
Commission defined, but Sinn
documents,
thaFully agree UNI
machen,Europa calls on
mssen siereforms to Documents
fr alle Organisatione
also
Es istlatersehrwhen moredie
gut, dass detailed
Somewhat provisions
EU-Institutionen usefulare viele drafted.
ihrer Arbeitsunterlagen
In der Zwischenzeit, bevor ffentlich
Fully einagree
zugnglich machen und politische
gesetzlich verpflichtendes Lobbyregister Beratungen einge
Somewhat useful Transparency register is Partially
not a tool agree
but a mere voluntary step for interested re
In this context, we are pleased that the Commission clearly supports more
ot transparentNot at all
all the information Very useful
(minutes of meetings, Utileappropriate,
information
An se ofobbligatorio
public in Fully
well-functioning
hearings) is agree
provided
transparency
on time register
or in an should
easily accessible
ensure that way
all p
openness
EFPIA welcomes and transparency,
the European notCommissions
only during theBetter impact assessment
Regulation process
Agenda, andbut the recently-agreed Inter-institutional Agreemen
Somewhat useful
throughout the legislative process. All Commission departments should commit Partially agree
ot transparenttoatthisall objective and actively Somewhat
involve useful
stakeholders. TheWeTransparency
regret thoughRegister Fully agree
that comitology
We would welcome, as a result, increased transparency in trialogue and procedures where appropriate and taking
latively transparent
the Commission does notSomewhat
go further useful
and publishes
It is essential that all stakeholders affected by possible EU action should have We final
believe
draft the
texts Register
and the Partially
is somewhat agree useful in
the opportunity tohelping
give their to views
achieve the overall
about initiativ
Les
draft
The institutions
impact
Commission europennes
assessments
should sontfinal
before
Somewhat
publish des
the institutions
initiative
useful
draft texts is and publiques
finalised
political
the and
aim
draft trs
of transparentes
adopted.
increasing
impact assessments dans
transparency
Partially leur and
agree
before mode
the de fonctionnement
bringing
initiative Europe
is finalisedcloserand: miseits dis
toadopted
EFPIA
Pour would
autant, also
certaineswelcome improved access to documents, meeting agendas and minutes, both from Council and the Europe
CIP firmly
latively transparent believes thatvolutions
this
Very would
useful
rcentes
greatly enhancede procdure the risquent de rendre
citizens. la prise de dcision europenne un peu plus opaq
Partially agree
-effectiveness
Ladoptionofde la lgislation
the impact secondaire
assessment review actes
process dexcution
leading ou actes
to better dlgus par la Commission europenne est assez
Finally,
-quality we would
Deoutcomes.
mme, la recommend
compositionVery useful
ades
consistent
groupes application
dexpertsThe Transparency
ofdtachs
the Commission par Registe
les Fully
policymembres,
Etats agree
of publishing information
ou certaines partieson stakeholder
prenantes meet
There should also be more transparency However, the about register
trilateralalso contains over-bureaucratic provisions, and/or dem
latively transparent
- Au Parlement europen, Somewhat useful
la Institutions.
tendance est de plus en plus that la ngociation Fully agree
negotiations between the three requirements can lead todamendements
misinterpretations deof compromis
the information au pralable
provided. des
-Transparency
We Enfin,
also call onregulation
lvolution
the vers
EuropeanSomewhat
une
AmCham EU welcomes the Commissions Better The adoptionuseful
Commission quasi to publishMeanwhile
systmatique all
Regulation public
Transparency
theconsultations
des
Agenda,
Register
textesRegister
iPartially agree
europens
the recent Rglement
is anInter-institutional
important tool for ou Directive
Agreement
regulating(IIA) en premire
lobbying.
on Better lec
It provLa
Very useful
and all new proposals immediately after their adoption This can by the thenCollegebe used Fully agree
of to fuel unjustified controversies about perfectly
The EU institutions
Commissioners.
Nevertheless, AmCham haveSomewhat
EU believesuseful that there are UNESPA
ethical
areasand
However, is
where committed
legal
AmCham EUtoinvites
collective
transparency Partially
f representation
in the
the agree
Commission of interest
EU decision-making to further/ advocacy
inform activities.
process the
canpublic
be furthe by
Somewhat useful Partially agree
Finally, AmCham EU would Somewhat
recommend useful a consistent Furthermore,
application AmCham
of the Commission
EUPartially
underlinesagree
policy
theofimportance
publishing of information
structurallyoninvolving
stakeho
The Commission is commit Very useful Fully agree
EENA recognises the bene Very useful More than useful, the Tr Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
Although some meetings,Somewhat useful We do not believe that thDisagree
1. When Mr Juncker assumed office as President of the European Commission, he made a commitment to enhance transpare
The EU institutions alre Somewhat useful The comparability of dat Fully agree
Cet
On 11 November 2014 the Commission publishedIl
objectif de transpa Somewhat useful apourrait
Communicationgagner tr on thattheNoWorking
opinion Methods of the European Commission 20
Currently we consider the Transparency Register is a somewhat useful to
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Con riferimento
This "rule", however al gradowasSomewhat
included inuseful a Communication Il registro
It instead perbecome
la
of traspa
one ofmandatory Fully
the agree
Commission willDecisions adopted later that month, then
Die Stadt Bamberg begrt die Bestrebungen der1.EU-Institutionen would zur Verbesserung andder be used as
Transparenz. a unique tool across
Die
We Kommunen
believe
Positiv wird that begren
die BerichterstattungSomewhat
d
European institutions useful
are currently
zu Treffen Die
2.
hochrangiger
Ein Zielrichtung
relatively
All registered
Transparenzregister und
transparent
Komissionsvertreter FunFully
parties asistwould agree
public
mitproperly
dann institutions.
use
Interessengruppen
ntzlich, wenn The
theseintool
proper in aimplementation
sowie
Umfang, transparent
insbesondere andof
seine Ausgesta eth
der th
2. Ongoing negotiations Somewhat on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
usefuluntersttzt Partially have been conducted entirely behind closed d
Die gute Verfgbarkeit von Dokumenten Dasdie isttgliche
sicher nicht Arbeit der des Fall, wennagree
Rechtsanwenders.
Partikularinteressenvertreter,
Je frhzeitiger und wie je konkreter
Handwer
While it is true that the register does contain
einessome useful information, zu such
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree a
Um bersichtlichkeit und Aussagekraft Transparenzregisters gewh
The only information that over 1 million EU citizens that signed a petition against TTIP have been given, has eine Klarstellung, se
been through a
Die Verhandlungen ber Somewhat ein Transparenzregister
useful Konsultationsbeitrge
sollten ihrerseits transparent von FullyKommunen,
stattfinden.
agree die
Wichtig
Teil eines ist auch
Mehrebenenregierens ws
Making the transparency register mandatory will not solve these problems.
latively transparent
L'UFIP
3. reconnat Commission
The European No opinion
les efforts constants submitsdes itselfinstitutions
to a mereeuropennes
5 parliamentary pour Disagree
amliorer
questions leurMEPs
from transparence.
each month. Il estThese
essentiel que toute
questions are
Dans le cadre de la ralisation No opiniondes tudes d'impact, It hasil serait
beenopportunreported que No opinion
celles-ci
by transparency soient publies that
watchdogs en amont
over half de thela publication
entries on
Les
When institutions
MEPs finally devraient
receive Somewhat
galement
answers,useful tre
theyplus are intransparentes
Toutefois,
the form of le lors
200 registre
de leurs
word c ngociations
answers,No opinion heavily trilatrales.
confined to the regurgitation of either in
In general, we would argue that there
Somewhat useful is openness and transparency
In light of this information, in most contacts
Disagree with policy be
it cannot reasonably makers,
statedinthat all the
institutions
Transparen and
No opinion No opinion
Transparency is one of the key components of an effective Better Regulation policy. It is essential that all stakeholders affected
ghly transparent Very useful BASE salue la cration du Fully agree
The Transparency Register is a useful tool as it puts focus on ethical and tran
ghly transparent In terms of public consultations by the European Commission, the design Partially
Very useful agree
of the questionnaire often prevents meaningful and u
latively transparent
Nous citons
When souvent la is
the consultation Very useful
transparence
carried out indes Institutions
preparation ofeuropennes
However an initiative
the Register comme
subject Fully
toexemple
contains agree
impact suivre dans
requirements
assessment, that
the les
can Etats
draft lead membres
impact
to misperceptionso nous
assessments
De plus, Il nous parait ncessaire Very useful d'amener plus de Le transparence
registre des reprsent dans la P prise
artiallyde agree
dcision du Conseil de l'Union europenne.
Confindustria
With regard tobelieves
the specific that the European
Somewhat
process of
useful institutions
requests forThe are
access quite
comparability transparent
to documents, of data and
reviews
Partially
should acknowledges
ofagree
be
policies
improved bytheEU continuous
between efforts made
institutions/regulatory
the different to in
categorie
agen
Fr allen am GesetzgebuSomewhat useful Diese Kontrollfunktion Disagree
Transparency
Not all European is also one of the
institutions arekey components
equally transparent. We
of an believe
effective
Among thebetter
Register regulation
most transparent is somewhat agenda. useful
It is in
EU institutions essential
helping that
to achieve
is the European all stakeholders
the overallaf
Parliament.
Chaque intervention de lVery useful La facult pour les profe Partially agree
At the other extreme is the Council of Ministers, which partly due to its heterogeneity fails to show the necessary transpare
latively transparent
In this
The context, Commission
European we are pleased Verysitsuseful
that the Commission
somewhere However,
in between clearlythethe supports
register
European more also Partially
openness
Parliament contains agree
and over-bureaucratic
and
the transparency,
Council in terms provisions,
notofonly during
and/or
transparency. therequ
imp
Wh
It would have been even Very
WWF has noticed that trilogues have now becomeuseful While
an established
the registerfeature Fully
is a necessary agree
of EU decision-making,
and important tool in order
to allow to reach
for publicfirst scrutin
reading
We also call on the European Somewhat Commission
useful to publish In order
EU newtoproposals
institutions remedy needtheseimmediately
to be Partially
unintended
serious after
agree effects,
abouttheir adoption
lobby we have bymade
transparency the College
some
as well. concrete
ofWWF
Commi wep
[1] http://www.oeilm.europarl.europa.eu/oeilm/home
Somewhat useful For the register to become Fully truly
agree
effective, we would need a legally mandatory
On trke,
CALIF estime ett
que avoimuus Somewhat
les institutions useful
europennes sontRekisteriss
relativement on paljon viFully agree
transparentes et reconnat leurs efforts continus d'amlioratio
Somewhat useful Nous pensons que le regi No opinion
CALIF estime que les insSomewhat useful Nous pensons que le regi No opinion
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Lobby register: As mentioned elsewhere there should
A lobby
be register
a legally-binding
which is no
register,
longerwith
voluntary,
comprehensive
but whichdisclosure
is backed requiremen
by the force

Proactive meetings transparency: All EU institutions


As should
a result,only
a commitment
meet with registered
to start negotiating
lobbyists, alists
legally-binding
of meetings lobby
shouldregister
be pro

For purposes
Trilogues: of this
These consultation,
informal Access Info
inter-institutional Europe
meetings
In theismeantime,
only focusing
between on transparency
the European
before Parliament,ofthe
a legally-bindingEU institutions
lobby
Council
register regarding
of the
is Europeanlobbying
introduced,
Union ac
it willan
b

Extending current rulesReforms


Access to documents: on proactive transparency
to bring the Access The
All to Commission
efforts
Documents
behind regulationshould expand
transparency 1049/2001 the into
register scope
will lineof
not its November
meet
with the Treaty 2014
its designated Decision
of Lisbon
goals by
ifw
Although
SUEZ welcomes the European institutions
Very usefulare relatively transparent, there is definitely
the seriou Fully roomagreefor improvement. The legislative processe
Das Transparenzregister ist grundstzlich geeignet Auskunft ber Akteure zu
Access
latively transparent
European Info also believesSomewhat
Ombudsman: Allother EU institutions
European useful
Ombudsman should implement
Furthermore,
decisions on the Commission
fulltransparency
tracking Fully agree
of lobbyist
shouldDecision or introduce
activities
be binding byfor EU similar
citizens rulesbepublishin
institutions.
The EU-institutions are good at giving insight intoAuch manygilt of es
theetwaigen
issues and verffentlichten
the lawmaking Fehlinformationen
work that is taking -can
z.B.only
place.ber achieve
Lobbykos
However, it
Somewhat useful Fully agree
Access
latively transparent to EU documents EU
Somewhat institutions should strengthen Regulation 1049/2001 to meet international standards on access
The EU institutions
It is also possible tohaveget an overviewuseful
introduced some
in the importantDertransparency
European VCI untersttzt
Parliament, die
thisvom
measures
but Partially
too although
requiresagree
BDI eingebrachten work.Reformvorschlge
transparency
some varies between
However, compared - siehe
them. bit
The
to natio
Verbesserungen gerade Somewhat useful Partially agree
Implementation of the regulation should ensure an efficient process for both citizens and institutions. The Commission should
Lobby
The EUregister:
latively transparent As mentioned elsewhere
Very useful there should be a legally-binding register (not onlya based on IIA), with comprehensive
Transparency Register could make a lot more
The EUs sense experience withFully
if the EU institutions the agree provide
Transparency better
Registeroverview of the
and comparative legislative
experiw
Somewhat useful Geelmuyden Kiese finds Fully
t agree
Trilogues transparency- All documents used in trilogue meetings should be proactively published in a timely manner. EU institu
Proactive
The main meetings transparency:
non-transparenc Very useful All EU institutionsTheshould
idea ofonlya lobby
meetregister
withFullyregistered
asagree
a toollobbyists,
to bring transparency
lists of meetings to EUshould
lobbyingbe pro
is
The International Standards for Lobbying Regulation also outline further polic
TTIP- The Commission should Somewhat followuseful
the European Ombudsmans recommendations Fully agree and provide full transparency on TTIP ne
Trilogues: These informal inter-institutional meetings A lobby
between
registerthewhich
European is noParliament,
longer voluntary,the Council
but which of theis European
backed by Union the force
an
There has been a great iVery useful Yes, it is useful and it Fully agree
ot transparentAccess
at all to documents: Reforms Very useful
to bring the Access useful
Asto only ifapoliticians
a result,
Documents commitment
regulation Fully agree
to1049/2001
start negotiating
into linea with
legally-binding
the Treaty of lobby
Lisbonregister
by w
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
European Ombudsman: Somewhat All European useful
Ombudsman In the
decisions
meantime, on transparency
before Fully
a legally-binding
should
agree be binding lobby register
for EU institutions.
is introduced, it will b
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparentTheat all
new comitology introduced Somewhat afteruseful
the Lisbon treaty put the decision-making Fully agree
process much more complicated and less trans
Additionally, due to the amount Somewhat of information
useful potentially available, real transparency Fully agree is only possible with the proper tools to fi
There is room for improvVery useful Very useful only if it m Partially agree
Odvisno je od angamajaSomewhat useful Kaj je lonica med lobir Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
Insurance Europe is committed to full transparency. However, it must be cons
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful For instance, the simultaneous Fully agree publication of the categories Full time equiva
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
The European
Insurance institutionSomewhat
Europe useful
provides the EU institutions While
with
Another
Asitsthe we find the
extensive
example,
existence ofexisten
industry
which Partially
experience
is more
a Register agree
problematic,
enables andinterested
expertise.
is the Insurance
possible
parties double
Europethose
to monitor counting
is involv
wh
No opinion In addition to completeness Fullyofagree
record, the details recorded on the Register m
The level of transparencySomewhat useful Creemos que el RegistroFully agree
de Transparencia es muy til ayudando a consegui
Repsol cree que las ins Somewhat useful Sin embargo, el Registro
Es ist sehr gut, dass die EU-Institutionen viele ihrer Arbeitsunterlagen ffentlich zugnglich Partially
incluye agree
actualmente machenrequerimientos
und politische queBeratungen
contribuye
Somewhat useful The register at present Partially agree
Somewhat useful The Register
Finanzielle represents
Mittel an essential
/ Mit Partially agree tool to monitor and track lobbying activi
Further progress can alwSomewhat useful For FEDMA, which has bee Partially agree
The Register in itself will not solve some of the most significant issues related
Further progress can alwSomewhat useful For FEDMA, which has bee Partially agree
European Institutions have put some efforts in enhancing transparency level in the EU but still a significant number of EU activ
the institutions do not Somewhat useful
The most important issue about EU transparencyInquality the meantime,
depends on making Partially
the complexity agree
the Transparency of its decision
Register making
compulsory
processand thatextendin
implie
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Also, revolving doors is another relevant phenomenon that is negatively affecting European transparency and accountability le
The EU institutions
La Poste reconnat ensure a certain degree of transparency. However, l'there are still some crucial stages of their decision-mak
However, Europeanles eVery useful
institutional Le sum
framework has enhanced
To registre itssatisfait
up, Transparency
transparency Partially
Register
level only agree
isvia
a useful
daily update
tool to of increase
web content.
transparency
The Euro in
Impact assessments along with the opinions from the regulatory scrutiny board must be actively disseminated once they a
Thanks to the Transparency Somewhat
Register useful
European officials and citizens can more Fully easily
agree control these organizations expenditure,
Infringement proceedings constitute the main instrument used by the Commission to fulfill its obligations under the TFEU
latively transparent
The legislative process Somewhat useful
falls short of the required transparency standard. FullyShadow
agree rapporteurs discuss and adopt, in total c
latively transparent
Very useful
Trilogue meetings are not foreseen by the EU TheTreaties
register and needs
prevent to be Fully
public
made agree
participation
mandatory from and legally
taking place
binding andformake
all lobbyists
the dis
Die europischen Instit Somewhat useful Das
Additionally, the rules needs toagree
Transparenzregister Fully be made clearer as to what needs to be decla
Somewhat useful Fully agree
No opinion AFA is fully committed toFully agree
transparency. We believe that the Transparency Re
We need to have accessVery useful For instance, the simultaneous Partiallypublication
agree of the categories Full time equiva
AFA isoffully
None thecommitted t Somewhat
options proposed, useful
including no opinionAnother example,and
is satisfactory, whichthey Fully
is introduce
more agreeproblematic,
a certain is biasthethe
possible
way they double counting
are formulate
We suggest therefore that:
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Transparency rules should
latively transparent Veryapply equally to all EU institutions
useful Fully agree
A legally-binding register,
Some are more transparen with comprehensive
Somewhat useful disclosure requirements,
For the transparency regiPartially and active agree
monitoring, enforcement and sanction capa
A code of conduct ensuring that EU institutions should Grundstzlich
It is important
only meet stellt
to with das
ensure Transparenzregister
registered
that thelobbyists,
lobby register einis sinnvolles
pro-actively mandatory Instrument
published andlists
that of adar, die
quality
meeti
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Public access to meetings including Council working group meetings
La transparence
Transparency devrait Very useful
of trilogues Verbesserungsbedarf
With an improved register, Disagree
besteht the insofern, dass der
EU institutions could Aufwand zur Registrierung
pro-actively use the regisu
Transparency
Reforms to bring the Access to Documents regulation 1049/2001 into line Partially
of trilogueVery useful with the agreeTreaty of Lisbon by widening its scope to en
Positiv ist hervorzuheb
All European Ombudsman Somewhat
decisionsuseful
on transparencyEs istshould
auerdem
A systematic be
use darauf
binding
of the forhinzuwirken,
Partially
register inagree
thisdass
EU institutions. sense Registereintrge
would be usefulimand Einklang
would mitalsod
Somewhat useful Fully agree
Grundstzlich stellt das Transparenzregister ein sinnvolles Instrument dar, die

The European Commission and European Parliament Verbesserungsbedarf


have made significant besteht insofern, dass
improvements in der
terms Aufwand zur Registrierung
of transparency over the up
Positiv ist anzumerken, dass die EU-InstitutionenDerzeit viele ihrer ist von
Arbeitsunterlagen
auen noch nicht ffentlich
erkennbar, zugnglich
was nach machen. Einreichung
Jedochmit sollte
derme Ko
Positiv ist there
However, hervorzuheb
do remain Somewhat
areas for useful Es istCode
Weiterhin
further improvement.
The auerdem
sollte
Trialogue
of Conduct, darauf
knftig hinzuwirken,
negotiationsPartially
Transparenz
alerts, and in agree dass Registereintrge
geschaffen
particular
complaints could werden,
benefit inwieweit
mechanisms from imgreater
provided Einklangdie mitTrd
Ergebn
bytranspa
the
Compared to a vast majority of the EU
Somewhat Member States, the European institutions
useful Fully agree have a much more developed and transpare
The Council also has many Somewhat
opportunities usefulfor improvingThe register transparency,
should facilitate
and Partially
much access
progress
agree for interest
remainsrepresentatives,
to be made withrather regards thanto rs
However the fact that not all European institutionsKritik are concerned
ist immer noch by the antransparency
der Vergleichbarkeit regime undermines
der Eingaben thisbzw. character.
ihres Informa
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparentTransparency
at all should also Very useful to the Council of the European
be applied Union, Fully as agree
one of the key dieinstitution in the
desproduction of EU
La transparence des activits de lobbying devraitInsbesondere pouvoir saccompagner verbesserungswrdig dune mmewre transparence Darstellungdes processus Personalaufwa
lgislatifs
In groen
Ein Teilen Transparenz
verbesserte arbeit Not useful knnteatber all ein integriertes
Das Transparenzregister
Register geschaffen Disagree werden, d.h. unter Einbeziehung aller magebli
Also,
Erhebliche European institutions
Fortschritte sind should
Somewhat
bereits guarantee the A right
Transparency
of public access
Register to Fully
documents
aloneagree cannot related
regulate
zur to policy
lobbying, making asvon itinMitgliedsbeitrg
must
aBeratungen
harmonised
be part o
La transparence est bnfique non bei useful
der Verffentlichung
seulement Weiterhin
pour le citoyen, fhren
vonmaisDokumenten
dieaussiunklaren
pourund Vorgaben
les ffentlicher
institutions Berechnung
Verfolgbarkeit
elles-mmes. von LUnion europene
latively transparent Somewhat useful The Register should be iFully agree
Access
With thetoTransparency
documents should
Register, alsothe cover informal The
EU institutions trilogues Transparency
- Commissionand conciliation
and Register discussions
Parliament is agree
indeed- made abetween
relevantthe toolEuropean
to highlight Commission,
informationthe tho
Fr
Le trilogue eine volle
estTranspar
un bon exemple Somewhat ; ce useful
processus Trotz
lgislatif der
estAnforderung
peu transparent deFully et rompt avec alahuge volont step deforward
la Commission in increasing de mie
Very useful La Fdration bancaire frFully agree
The European
However, Youthstill
loopholes Forumexist:welcomed the development To contribute initiated to by lobbying
the Juncker regulation Commission
at the European to close level, the loopholes
the Transparency in the EU
We Believe that the eu i Somewhat useful To much information. Partially agree
- The activities of the Council are not covered by the Register.
latively transparent
However
- Legislative more could be such
"practices" Somewhat
done as usefulto acts
in delegated
regards the record
European
and
Shedding of meetings
trilogue institutions
light onbetween
negotiations Fully
who(Commission,
iskeep
trying agree
EUlagging
political Parliament
to influence representatives
behind and Council)
decision-makers
in terms ofand high-ranking
should
transparency,
is bebeing
the necessary comm
officin
- The scope of application Very useful Fully agree
DIGITALEUROPE believesofthat thethe Register lacks ofThe
EU institutions coherence:
make Transparency
a strongwhile Commissioners,
Register
effort to actalso in a allows theircitizens,
transparent members manner.journalists
of cabinet and
As previously and external
European obse
mentione C
Transparency is not a goal Somewhat
per se but useful
the highestContribution
level of it is necessaryof interest to representatives
Fully
ensure agree a fair, is openessential
and trustful
to the relationship
drafting of legislatio betwee
We believea that the Transparency Register hastransparency
the potential to beunnecessary
athose
very use
We
However, believewe that effortsthat
believe inVery
increasing
there useful transparency
are various areasHowever,to improve
DIGITALEUROPE
where the EU balance
theinstitutions
perceptionshould
believes Partially
canof
bethe
that foundagree
EU
increase
the between
institutions
Transparency
transparency should fornow
Register theisand target
benefit
a somewhat of all asp
stak
us
The EU policy making env Very useful The Transparency Registe Fully agree
We would like it to include Legislative footprints disclosing comprehensive a
Furthermore,
Decisions thatwe wouldpeoples
affects welcome
Somewhat greater
lives useful
should transparency
be made However, surrounding
with andwe forbelieve thethere
people trilogues
atPartially
arecentre.
the areas
asagree
we wherefind this improvements
to be an opaque can be partmade.
of theThis
leg
ghly transparent Somewhat useful The reporting should be Fully expanded agreeto all actors involved in the EU policy-mak
Ever
As the
Die practice,
largest
Vielzahl from
social
der best
sector
Aufgaben possible
Somewhat dietoGre
pan-European
und worst der
useful possible
networks
Behrden isoftoNGOs
be
machtseen we inexperience
different
Transparenz parts
that of
Partially
sicherlich whiletheschwierig.
agree different
we may be EU
Aber institutions.
informed
wir haben andWhile inwe
consulted,
z.B. ackn
Deutscwe
-Fr The current voluntary
NGO, die ausschlielich register
Somewhat is not efficient.
mit ehrenamtlich
useful The register should
ttigen Krften arbeiten, wird be compulsory
Fullyes dadurch and legally binding.
agree erschwert bis unmglich, sich in geme In this sense, the use of
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
- Reform the way citizens can get access to documents, with a principle of "open by default". There are too many cases of ma
Il y a un manque de tranVery useful
Die EU-Institutionen haben einige wichtige Manahmen bezglich Transparenz Partially agree Trotzdem gibt es noch vieles, wasv
eingefhrt.
-The intentions
Proactive of the JuofSomewhat
publication meetings from useful Those who
all EU institutions, have and
bodies signed Partially
up
agencies is agree
needed. These should be included in a cen
Auch wenn wir wissen, dass
latively transparent Verydie usefulEU-Kommission dazu derzeit keine Mglichkeit Fully agree sieht: Langfristig muss das EU-Lobbyregister
- Most
The of the legislation
transparency of
Somewhat
the European useful Union (EU)
Although is today the adopted
lobby regisFully
inusing an years.
informal,
agree non-democratic, non-accountable andm
If talking
Die about theofTransparency
EU-Kommission
European
wird fr's erste
institutions
Register has significantly
In
nur einofverpflichtendes
the EP our
andview,EC, improved
the
as ITransparency
Register have recent
already
aufgrund
Register
mentioned,
einer
There is aitare,
very
lacks
interinstitutionellen
however,
useful tool
transparency some to promote
Vereinbarung
areas where
with regards transp
einrichtet
Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent
Transparency
-Anothermssenimportant in the Somewhat
EU institutions
modification
die Kontrollen der of the
Eintrge useful
is still an issue
Register
deutlich The
would
verstrkt ofbeTransparency
concern.
the mandatory
werden WhileRegister
(was effortsPartially
indication
deutlich have
is
mehr agree
a positive
been
of the made
Personal initiative
iminSekretariat
specific the butpast
regulationsit isfew
not andyears
a silver
erfordert). to bullet
directiveschange to
tha
-On the other
mssen hand, while
Sanktionen auch Somewhat
since the Lisbon
angewendet useful Treaty Introducing
werden. co-decision ahas legislative
becomefootprintPartially
the ordinary recording
agree
The transparency register is a useful tool for shedding light on who the actors
legislative
all input procedure,
receivedinvolving from interest up torep 3
-It mssen
should alsoalle include
EU-Beamten,information
Somewhat
bei denenabout
usefulthe fact whether
Lobbyarbeit At stattfindet,
this stage,
the lobbyistto die
in my Regel
is
opinworking
Partially on agree
einbezogen his own or is representing
werden, dass sich nurthe interestsLobb
registrierte of h
ghly transparent -La mssen
Whilst politiqueauch
various Abgeordnete
enrankings
matire d'accsVery
on sich
useful
lobby diese Regel auferlegen.
transparency
l'information est
or In exemplaire
the addition,
right of access plusieurs
the lobby Fully places
gards
to register
information agreesi put
on thecompare
theonus lestransparency
EU institutions
of institutions europennes
at a comparatively
on outside act a
h
-Il muss das Register
y a nanmoins auch
aussi des fr
Very den
points
useful Rat inklusive
de grande der
LobbyControl
inquitude
L'ide stndigen
du
quiregistreVertretungen
untersttzt
concernent comme die
gelten
notamment
PartiallyIdeesowie eines
agree
les groupesfr
Lobbyregisters
alle d'experts
EU-Agenturen als
de Mittel
la und fr
Behrden.
Commission mehr Tra eu
-The
Tomssen fullyauch
beEuropean Rechtsanwaltskanzleien
Commission usefulsich
is a relatively openeintragen.
administration,
-But If the
transparent, Somewhat it's registrations
necessary which that are
is sometimes
alldone
Fully by
agree
organisations third
more parties,
transparent
influencingand this EUand system
accessible
decision-making is notthan coupledwha
sign
Fr LobbyControl ist es essentiell, langfristig ein Lobbyregister einzufhren, w
It seems that threy are Very useful Partially agree
Zugang
However, zuforDokumenten:
several LobbyControl inbegrt es, isIfdie
theRegulierung 1049/2001 toan den Vertrag von Lissabon anzupassen, inde
Les degrs varient : lereasons,
Not usefulpoliticsat all Brussels -Le
Eindu
more registration
registre distant
gesetzlich
to citizens
system
est verpflichtendes
INDISPEN is
across
Disagree work, the itEU. must The also
overall
be
Lobbyregister wrde den Behrden die Mglic
coupled
level of with
citizens
effective
confidesa
Proposition n4 : Accentuer la transparence au sein Conseil de lUnion europenne
The transparancy
Triloge: Diese is onlySomewhat
informellen useful Without active monitoring Fully agree
Les
Local rgles
and national politics interinstitutionellen
de transparence aredevraient
less distantsappliquerTreffen-au
to citizens: This zwischen
Conseil
Media dedem
registration lUnion
reports Europischen
system
more europenne.
about
overlooks them, Parlament,
Le
the onus dem
secrtariat
citizens of
have Europarat
du Conseil
transparency
more personal undthatder
devrait Europi
formule
should
contacts bew
In relation to corporatio Very useful Corporate
In influence takePartially
der Zwischenzeit, bevor ein gesetzlich agree verpflichtendes Lobbyregister einge
TTIP: Die Europische
Proposition
Transparency n5is:essential
Rendre Kommission
Somewhat
plus limpide
because useful
sollte
thelevery der Empfehlung
fonctionnement
existenceWhilstofitdes isder
the Europischen
procdures
true
EU institutions FullyisOmbudsfrau
informelles
that the European inagree
question
Commission infolgen undbegun
an unprecedented
has fr volle listing Transparenz
manner. We be
its meetings be
Les travaux informels deVery type useful
'Trilogue' ou COREPER pourraient tre plusFully transparents,
agree notamment pour tre mieux compris d
Todays European UnionSomewhat is sometimes useful
rather seen Finally,
as a Europe
the EU of institutions
lobbyists Fully
have
than agreea
yet Europe
to produce of citizens.
an adequateThe number legislativeof active footplo
Comments or suggestions 2.2 The
(Optional)
Register does nComments or suggestions 3.1 What
(Optional)
is your impre
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaChurches and political p Average
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certachiese e comunit religiose Average
Changed to include certaINCLUDE THOSE LIST Good
Changed to include certaEvery entity influencing Average
il manque le conseil Changed to include certan'importe quelle organis Average
Debera abarcar tambinChanged to include certaEn mi opinin, la obligacAverage
Changed to include certaMandatory too for regiona Good
Changed to include certaAt least churches and reAverage
Changed to include certaI think those entities m Average
Changed to include certaWhy not include any typ No opinion
Fully agree ... if all act Changed to include certaAll entities. No opinion
Changed to include certaSe deberia incluir en el Average
No opinion Poor
Changed to include certaInclude all parties ment Poor
Changed to include certaalle. Average
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certaI think that changing the Good
Siehe oben: Ich wnsche, Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaDevrait inclure: partis Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
EU
This question could be made clearer. The reply could be "mostly agree". Good
regulatory agencies Preserved the same as currently
It is a clear weakness of Changed
the register
to that
include
an (increasingly)
certaShould beimportant
included:category
ChurGood of lobbyists, i.e law firms, are often not mentione
Changed to include certaChiese e comunit religioGood
Changed to include certain types
In my of entities
opinion (plof representatives
all kind Good should be included.
However, it is only appl Changed to include certaBut I can imagine that governmentsGood and international intergovernmental orga
Changed to include certaDecisions that influence No opinion
Changed to include certaCertain entities
Inclure les are imp Average
organisations internationales comme le FMI et la banque mondiale
Changed to include certaInclure les organisations Averageconfessionnelles,
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
No opinion Average
Changed to include certaNo entity should be excl No opinion
Changed to include certaChurches and religious i No opinion
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl No opinion
Changed to include certaALL tentatives to influe Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaDevraient apparatre surGood
Changed to include certaWhy not include all? If noGood
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaInclure toutes les organ Good
Kommunikationskanle un Preserved the same as currently Good
Should include a mentionChanged to include certaThe Register should incl Good
Nous savons tous qu'elleChanged to include certaTout ce qui influe sur la No opinion
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certainclure toutes les entits Average
Changed to include certaTo include anyone who cAverage
Changed to include certaChiese, comunit religiose Average
Changed to include certaReligionsgemeinschaften, Average
Pour plus de transparence Changed to include certaPour une totale transparAverage
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaToutes personnes ou entiNo opinion
Registered organization Changed to include certasee the US example, no Good
All methods of communicat Changed to include certachurches, religious commu Average
Changed to exclude certaIglesias y comunidades rGood
Changed to include certaIl devrait tre modifi po No opinion
Changed to include certachurches and religious cAverage
Changed to include certaBy excluding organisation Good
Changed to include certareligious communities sho Good
Changed to include certaLe registre devrait sans Average
Changed to include certaall of the information i Good
La traduccin de lobby pChanged to exclude certa Las diferentes iglesias Good
Changed to include certaAll entities Good
Changed to include certaUm Schlupflcher zu verm Good
Changed to include certaPolitical parties should Average
Changed to include certaInclure les Etats, pour l No opinion
Changed to include certaInclure les Etats, pour l No opinion
Changed to include certales
Le registre s'applique
glises et Poor religieuses, les partis politiques, les services
les communauts
Changed to include certaPas d exception non justifies.
Average
No opinion No opinion
Changed to include certaAll informations must be Poor
If the definition is too b Changed to include certaThe member states influ Average
Changed to include certa No opinion
The Register covers onlyChanged to include certaAll lobbyists should be Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
rajouter dans la dfinit Changed to include certainclure toutes les entits Good
Il est indispensable qu' Changed to exclude certa les glises et communautGood
Changed to include certaThere should be no excluPoor
Changed to include certaKirchen und Religionsg Good
No opinion No opinion
Changed to include certales glises et les commuGood
Changed to include certaEvery entites that aren' Average
Changed to exclude certathe distinction between rGood
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaIl faut une transparence Good
Le attivit rientranti ne Changed to include certaAnyone
Qualsiasiwhogruppo di press
pushes for aPoor
legislation, policy or anything else in whatever way
It shold also include exp Changed to include certaThe same applies to pressure Good received from MEPs outside their Parliamentar
No opinion Good
le registre permet il de No opinion Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaI'd include all the entiti Poor
Preserved the same as currently Good
Is signing a petititon by Preserved the same as currently Good
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaQue todas esas negociaci No opinion
Changed to include certaThe scope should be extAverage
Changed to include certapartiti politici, governi d Average
Changed to exclude certain types of entities (pl Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Il manque, ce qui devrai No opinion Average
Preserved the same as currently
There is no point having Good
a mandatory lobbying register if some organisations
Preserved the same as currently Good of what kind of organisation should be decla
Also, it should not be a question
Changed to include certaFinally, law firms that refuse
Goodto sign the register should be blacklisted. If law f
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certainclude everyone Poor
No opinion Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaKirchen und Religionsgem Average
Changed to include certaAll entities aiming to in Good
Changed to include certaToutes les entits cites Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
No opinion Good
Un doute peut subsister Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
O termo local no cl Changed to include certaO Registo deve ser obri Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
VOUS DECRIVEZ L'INSChanged to include certaLES PAYS TIERS DOIV No opinion
tout ceci est inutile si No opinion Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
mme commentaire que No d opinion Le registre n'est pas le Poor
Changed to include certaeither you allow visibili No opinion
No opinion Average
Ce ft une trs dsagraNo opinion Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certaInclude regional public aAverage
Changed to include certaErzielen von "WaffengleiGood
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
No opinion SAREBBE OPPORTUNO Average
INSERIRE , TRA I SOGGETTI INTERESSATI, ANC
Changed to include certa Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
This definition excludes Changed to include certachurches and religious Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
accessibilit ce regist Changed to exclude certainclure toutes les entit Poor
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
No opinion Average
Cette rponse refltebpl Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
No opinion Good
Preserved the same as currently No opinion
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certadovrebbero essere inclusAverage
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to exclude certaExclusion should be exten Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaJeder der Lobbying betr
We consider very important Good
and urgent, there is an identification, differentiate
Changed to include certaOok religieuze instanti Good
Changed to include certaWe believe that unions as Average
a fundamental part of society and as a pillar of the
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
i disagree with the regis No opinion i disagree with the regis Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to exclude certaI would consider it approGood
No opinion Good
Le registre existant ne Changed to include certale Registre ne devrait a Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaall institutions should re Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaalles erin Average
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaAll influence groups musGood
Changed to include certaIncludere chiese e comun Good
Changed to include certaNo creo que deba explicGood
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Poor
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to exclude certaShould include churchesGood
Preserved the same as currently Good
No opinion Average
In den Geltungsbereich Changed to include certaDas Register sollte ebe Good
Changed to include certaall sould have the same Good
The Council is missing. TChanged to include certaAny hint of backdoor inf Good
Changed to include certaRegister should inclusie a Average
Changed to include certaDeberan incluirse tambiNo opinion
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaThe above mentioned enti Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Poor
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to exclude certa ovit ppadnou nrodnGood
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaAll the stakeholders invoAverage
Changed to include certaThe Register should incl No opinion
Changed to include certaany entities which wish t No opinion
Changed to include certaChurches and other simila Average
Changed to include certaTous les intervenants auAverage
Changed to include certaThe spirit of the regist Good
Changed to include certaEntidades religiosas debNo opinion
Changed to include certaRat und Europischer Rat Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaThe register should incl Average
Changed to include certaThird countries'governmen Average
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Il ne couvre absolument Cp hanged to include certaLes glises et les commuAverage
No opinion No opinion
Preserved the same as currently Average
Local and regional governments, their national representative associations an
Au sein du registre, une Changed to include certaLes glises et les commuGood
Preserved the same as currently Good
For this reason, we call for the exemption on local governments and their ass
Changed to include certaKommunalbehrden, -z Good
Preserved the same as currently
Samband is more than Average
happy that our meetings with EU officials, MEPs
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl No opinion
Changed to include certaToutes
Neither our constitution
les organisations Good nor our Parliament transparency standards trea
No opinion When Lobbying is not a rGood
Crucially Samband is explicitly recognised in the existing Local Governm
Changed to include certachurches and religious Average
Changed to include certaToute
entit ayant
Samband, des a Average
or indeed our sister organisations in other Member States doe
Changed to include certachurches and religious cAverage
Changed to include certaKirchen, ReligionsgemeiAverage
It does not have any private or voluntary body within our membership.
The register shows me thChanged to include certaEvery organization or peGood
Changed to include certaTrossamfund,
It has a public law statute and our employees are bound by same the ter
foreningerAverage
Preserved the same as currently Good
Its employees are directly accountable to an elected member assembly f
Changed to include certaalle, fr die Ausnahmer Average
No opinion Furthermore Article 4 of the Good
Lisbon Treaty recognises local and regional gove
Changed to include certaGleiches Recht fr Alle. Average
The Register only coversChanged to include certaThe
In theRegister
interestshould inclu
of better Average we call on you to exclude local governme
law-making,
Changed to exclude certa No opinion
Sollte auch als Registri Changed to include certaauf alle Mitgliedsstaate Average
Changed to include certaDans
Il faudrait inclure
un esprit detous l Average
lacit bien compris, les glises et communauts des diver
Dans la pratique, la s Changed to include certaPar ailleurs, de plus en plus Poorles autorits publiques rgionales sont reprsent
Changed to include certaNobody should be exclu Average
Changed to include certaall entities should be inc Good
Changed to include certadevrait inclure tout grou Good
Changed to include certaif a local governement cAverage
Les sociologues qui tudChanged to include certaAide par les sociologues Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl No opinion
Suggestion:(...) include Changed to exclude certa Exclude indirect represenNo opinion
Changed to include certaDeben incluirse todas la Good
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaThe
Kirchen und ReligionsgeGood
Register should apply to all entities taking part into negotiations, policym
Informal negotiations areChanged to include certaYes, it's a huge work, butAverage
this would ensure an efficient transparency. (And cr
Changed to exclude certaExclude churches and relGood
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certaTransparency would be iNo opinion
Hacer lobby en el RegistNo opinion Average
Changed to include certaSe deben incluir las igl Average
Changed to include certaSee remarks above. Good
No opinion As the register is still Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certapolitical parties, Membe Average
Mention the unofficial affChanged to include certaThe
All decision
Registeraffecting p Average
should include churches and religious communities, political pa
Changed to include certaThese actors can represent Average
interests of other stakeholders, so that the promo
Activities also include i Changed to include certaAs of the moment that thAverage
Preserved the same as currently Average
Subject to previous que Changed to include certaNo exemptions, particularNo opinion
Diffrencier clairement Changed to include certaInclure tous ceux qui ex Average
Changed to include certaAll people or groups shoAverage
Changed to include certaI don't understand why Average
No opinion Average
Changed to include certaToute entit publique devGood
Changed to include certaAll entities should be in Good
Le registre doit lister le Changed to exclude certaAucune exception.
Churches TransAverage
and religious communities, political parties, Member States' govern
Changed to include certa Average
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Poor
No opinion No opinion
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl No opinion
Changed to include certaInclure les glises et l Good
Changed to include certaAll lobbying should be c Average
Changed to exclude certaI cannot see, why anybod Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Difficults mettre en Changed to include certaTout sauf organisme dip Average
Changed to include certaTout ce qui peut influer Good
Changed to include certaAfin d'viter des drives Good
No opinion Average
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Poor
Changed to include certaReligious groups and autPoor
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Poor
Changed to include certaInternational intergover Poor
Changed to include certait is laughable that the Poor
Changed to exclude certain types of entities (pl Poor
Changed to include certaThe Register should incl Poor
Changed to include certaInclude everyone in the Average
Changed to include certachurches and religious cAverage
Changed to include certaIt should include all, n Average
Changed to include certaInclude all religious or Average
Mais uma vez no acrediNo opinion Poor
Preserved the same as currently Average
The Register must include Changed to include certaThere must be NO exclusio Average
Changed to include certaMust include all entities No opinion
Changed to include certaAlso churches and all ki Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to exclude certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certaIt is reasonable to excl Average
Il ne doit pas etre option Changed to include certail dervait inclue les gou Average
Cette dfinition est trs Changed to include certaLe registre devrait enti Good
Changed to include certaIt should include all entit Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to exclude certaDen Kommunen und ihren Good
No opinion No opinion
It should further define Changed to include certaNo group should be exclu Average
Changed to include certaI see no reason at all to Average
Changed to exclude certachurches and religious cNo opinion
Changed to include certaAll the organizations sh Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Preserved the same as cThe EU needs to ensureGood t
Changed to include certainclure les mouvements rGood
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certainclude any actor which iPoor
Preserved the same as cglises et communautsAverage
Changed to include certano strong reason why soGood
Changed to include certaIl faut inclure communautAverage
Changed to include certaShould include religious Good
Changed to include certapolitical parties, third Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaLes religions Good
Il ne couvre pas toutes Changed to include certainclure les communautsPoor
Changed to include certaLes services gouvernemen Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaDo not exempt religious Average
Changed to include certaReligious entities are po Average
No opinion Average
Changed to include certaAll entities should be in Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaas the entities mention Good
Changed to include certaNo-one at all should be Average
Sounds an awful lot like Changed to include certaIf it excludes foreign g Poor
Changed to include certaChurch's and religions Average
No opinion No opinion
Changed to include certaReligious communities, pGood
Changed to include certaReligious entities shouldGood
Changed to include certaInclude all lobbying wit Poor
Changed to include certaThere is no reason to le No opinion
Changed to include certaIt should include all the Good
Same comment as abovChanged to include certaNot the right answer, a No opinion
Changed to include certaIt should be changed so No opinion
Changed to include certaShould include all entitieAverage
No opinion Average
Changed to include certaAnyone who tries to pestNo opinion
Changed to include certaThere should be no discrGood
Changed to include certaIt definitely should appl Poor
Changed to include certapartis politiques Good
Changed to include certaAs to political parties, No opinion
Changed to include certaExclusion in this case is Average
Changed to include certaChurches and Religious Good
Changed to include certaAll those listed above m Good
Changed to include certaall institutial approaches Average
Changed to include certaALL should be recorded.Poor
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaInclude religious groups,Good
Preserved the same as cNicht einzusehen, warumAverage
Changed to include certaChurches, Religious comm Average
Changed to include certaThe more the merrier. Id Poor
Changed to include certapetitions should also be Good
Changed to include certaAll lobbyists ought to b Good
Changed to include certaChurches should be inc Average
No opinion No opinion
The definition is fine en Changed to include certaIt should include all gr No opinion
Changed to include certaRegister all churches an Average
This will result in a ts Changed to include certaIWhy would
know the entities
that freedom mPoor is a fundamental rights, but it concerns me wh
of religion
Changed to include certaI also think third countries Good
government and international intergovernmental or
Changed to include certaInclude everyone and eve Good
Changed to include certaNo organisations, regardPoor
Changed to include certaReligious groups should Average
Changed to include certaIt should include any typ No opinion
Changed to include certaEverything that is not a Average
Changed to include certaall entities should be t Average
Changed to include certaAll entities that contri Poor
Changed to include certaChurches must not be alPoor
Changed to include certaAll policymaking entities No opinion
Changed to include certaAll entities should be inc No opinion
Changed to include certaReligious entities shoul Good
See my earlier commentChanged to include certaEvery party with the inte Good
Changed to include certaThe Register is transpar Good
Changed to exclude certa I'm not at ease with churAverage
Changed to include certaEvery sort of agency sh Good
Why not include the CouChanged to exclude certa Churches and religious cGood
Changed to include certaInclude absolutely every Average
No opinion Average
Changed to include certaAny organisation, compan Good
Changed to include certaChanged to include ALL A t verage
Preserved the same as cZolang de invloed van deGood
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certaAll of the above except l Good
Changed to include certainclude everyone Average
Changed to include certaReligious entities shouldGood
Changed to include certaAll entities No opinion
Changed to include certaWhy would you not detailGood
Changed to include certaALLE Einrichtungen, die No opinion
No opinion Average
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaChurches and religious cAverage
Changed to include certaI don't know the reason Good
Changed to include certaEvery group influencing Average
Under no circumstances No s opinion Ridiculous. If this death No opinion
Changed to include certaIt should include each st Average
Changed to include certablanket inclusion of all thGood
Changed to include certakirkot, uskonnolliset yhteGood
This register covers no l Changed to include certain types
Every of entities
single (pl Good
entity should be regulated. Religion should not be above or supe
Changed to include certaAlso registration should be Average
mandatory. How can any group or institution with
Changed to include certaAlle nichtstaatlichen un Good
Changed to include certaAn anti-corruption systemAverage
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaI believe that pretty m
No it does not include the infuencing of a person itself it includes their policy Poor
decisions but not personal beliefs that might be ch
Also this needs to includeChanged to include
family members certaChruches
friend Churches
workplaceshould
partnersalso
of beGood
and
course
spouses
be included
as wellinasthat
children
as theofpublic
any given
should
politician.
know if an
Also any politician shouldChanged
be disallowed
to include
fromcerta
deciding
also should
within legislation
every meeting
affecting
Poor
with aany
third
institution
party government
that any family
be registered
member workas wel
fo
Changed to include certaReligious communities and Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
No opinion Average
The general public doesnPreserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaAny entity which wishes tAverage
Changed to include certaAlle entiteiten opnemen! Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaInclude all those which Average
Changed to include certaAb einer bestimmten Gr Average
No opinion No opinion
Changed to include certaReligious entities, intern Good
No opinion Poor
Changed to include certaThe more transparency, tAverage
Changed to include certaTous les groupes, associAverage
Changed to include certaReligious communities an Average
Debiera extenderse a todChanged to include certaDebieran inscribirse tod No opinion
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaMust include all, especi Average
Changed to include certaThe register should applyGood
Changed to include certaThe register shouldincludGood
No opinion Poor
Changed to include certaAll parties should be reg No opinion
If it covers everything t Changed to include certaThe It should include
register shouldeveryt Poor
be expanded to include every entity that aims to influence
Changed to include certaThe nature of the influence Poor
on policy making and the need for transparency d
Changed to include certaTous les groupes d' influ Average
Changed to include certaFor better transparency aGood
Changed to include certaThird country influences Average
How feasible is it to inc Changed to include certaChurches and religious cGood
No opinion Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Poor
You forgot to mention hoChanged to include certaWhy should churches and Good
Changed to include certaReligious communities wiAverage
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certaEverybody bringing Amy No opinion
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl No opinion
Changed to include certaVerpflichtung sich einzu Average
Changed to include certaReligionsgemeinschaftenNo opinion
A legislao deve ser cl Changed to include certaOs mais corruptos foramGood
Changed to include certaAll of them should be in Poor
Changed to include certaReligious
Churches communities
and religious sh Average
communities should not influence governments at all,
Changed to exclude certa Company's with ulterior No opinion
Changed to include certaThird countries' governments Goodrarely have the interests of the EU as their main
It would be usefull to addChanged to include
lists of main eventscerta Ilthematics
andThe devrait impliquer
balance upon
seems tout
which about Good
lobbiesdecentmight
on have
that side.
met and lobbied politicians. Basica
Preserved the same as currently Good
In the individuals fiches there should
Changed be an "event
to include certaAdding
Thelist"register
which
gouvernment
indicate
should be that
would theybemet
t Average interesting
such politician
but it can
to lobby,
be difficult
abouttosuch
keeptopic,
trackao
After looking through a f Changed to include certaIt should apply to every Average
If i look for example Amazon's
Changedpageto:include
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/displaylobbyist.do?id=36611
certaIAnyalsopublic
understand reading
authorities anGood the transparency agreement ( http://eur-lex.europa
And this is a good thing : While they do have a right like everybody else to m
Changed to include certaEspecially religious enti Average
I picked Amazon because it is a big and well known organization for technophiles. A household brand on the same level than "
No opinion Why do i highlight this ? No Well, opinion
i suspect it is important for a secular EU state-l
Preserved the same as currently Average
Reading the page, I can see who are the lobbyists, and what are the topics they are somewhat following, but not much more.
Changed to exclude certa churches
So, and religious
expanding informationcPoor on religious groups' lobbying to seems important t
It would be interesting toPreserved
know for mosts
the same
people
as cthat read the register thatAverage 2 years ago they were writing themselves parts of o
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Auch Europischer Rat sChanged to include certaReligionsgemeinschaften, Good
Changed to include certaSame treatment for eve Good
Preserved the same as currently
El registro no debiera aplicarse Poor a toda aquella entidad no obligada a ello, sie
Habra que matizar el alcChanged to include certaPor otro lado, toda entidad Average
pblica no obligada a registrase y todas aquellas
Changed to include certaDas Register sollte um Average
Changed to include certaTransparency principles G s ood
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to exclude certa Churches and religious No opinion
Changed to include certaAny organization that is Average
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaIt is hard to see why lo Average
The definition is good, buNo opinion Good
Sans doute serait-il trs appropri de permettre aux glises de se prononcer
Comme indiqu plus haut, Changed to include certaN.B. : cette rponse est une Good opinion formule titre personnel, qui n'engage
No opinion Good
No opinion Poor
Habra que matizar el alcChanged to include certaToda entidad pblica queAverage
Changed to exclude certa Churches and religious cGood
Changed to include certaAny person or entity tha No opinion
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certaChurches and political paPoor
Changed to include certaAll entities that lobby t Poor
Changed to include certaI can't see why churchesNo opinion
It is important you hear it from my point of view and
It isthat
important
is of a Peruvian
you hear Citizen
it from my
whopoint
lovesofhis
viewcountry
and that
deeply
is of and
a Peruvian
is extremely
Citiz

I am no magician nor a fortune teller but I can already


I am no
tell magician
that your nor
findings
a fortune
on this
teller
process
but I can
will come
already
totell
showthatthat
your
the
findings
process
o

I can already tell by the articles the JNE are putting


I can
outalready
but the tell
mostbygrieving
the articles
feeling
the is
JNEthatare
this
putting
will come
out but
to light
the most
too late
grieving
and w

BUT I will talk on behalf of the people who are showing BUT I will theirtalk
outrage
on behalf
due of to the
this people
decision.whoThearefact
showing
is that their
throughout
outragethisdueLEGA
to th
Good and most importanChanged to include certaAll institutions and mem No opinion
And that is the very thingChanged
is in question NOWcerta
to include andAnd I think
Every that you
is the
entity should
veryto
triyng take
thing
in under
is in question
Good great consideration
NOW and Ithe thinkfollowing:
you should take und
WHY did they (JNE) act the way they
Changed did, I am
to include sure
certa WHY
Thethe did
actions
registertheyhave
(JNE)
thattoputactTODOS
incl the wayPOR
Average they ELdid,PERU
I am sureout the
of campaign
actions that were
putlong
TOD b
WHY did it happen
The register at that
is difficult Nospecific
opinionmoment, please WHY
The take did
lacka look
it happen
of at thefor
means at
polls
that historical
specific moment,
anAverage data for the
please
last take
90 days
a lookandatyoull
the polls
see th
hi
No opinion No opinion
Please also focus on the WHO, who actually shared Please lightalso
on thefocuserror
onmadethe WHO, by thewhopolitical
actually
party
shared
whichlight
greatly
on the
benefit
errorthe
made
otheb
Changed to include certaThe religious communities Average
But most Importantly please Preserved thethe
question same
WHY asthis
currently
ButJNE most official
Importantly
did not please Good
show more
question
leniency
the WHY
towards
this the
JNEdemocratic
official didprocess
not show by
And that for some reasonPreserved the same as
the JNE judgments is currently
more
And that forgiven
for some
and Ireason
am sureGood
theshe
JNEwilljudgments
be allow toiscontinue.
more forgiven and I am sure
I pray you can read this message
Changed andto exclude
can notice
certaIKommunale
how
prayforyou mecan and read
thosethiswhomessage
Good
Gebietskrperschaften,I shareandthe can
same
ihre notice
concern
how there
Zusammenschlsse for meis and
clearly
undthose a Verb
ihre case
who f
Churches and religious communities should definitely be included.
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Institutionen stellen auchAverage die kommunalen Verwaltungen Ebenen der ffentlic
A too broad definition is meaningless. By the above Firstdefinition
of all, different
any citizencountries
that writes
have an very
email
different
to hisstandards
representative
on whatin parliamen
constitute
quel que
Crucial soit le lieu o Changed to exclude certa
are: lBut
e lobbying
even if we desareEtats meAverage
talking about actual churches and religious groups. A lot o
Conflicts
1) aim (asofalready
interestincan
the Preserved the same as currently
definition above) There really is no reasonGood to exclude them. They are not above the law.
2) quantity (e.g. how often) Changed to exclude certa Local and municipal autho Good
3) professionality (are theChanged
people doing
to include
it paidcerta
forAlso,
doingone it? Orshould
are they
only at exclude
least
Goodpart political
of anparties
organization
if this isthat
notsatisfies
too easily 1) abusable
?)
Wie sieht das dann im Changed to include certaKirchen- und Religionsg Good
Changed to include certaIk vind eigenlijk dat ied Average
Die Frage, die sich hier Changed to include certaInternationale zwischensGood
The scope of the register should be very clear. Public administrations on all le
Changed to include certaA maximum of transparenc Good
Changed to include certaTransparantie krijg
On the other hand, all other je pas Average
organisations should be included. Noting that the
Changed to include certamona zamieszcza inform Good
The definition is too na Changed to include certaFurthermore, the Register Average
should be mandatory for membership of all bodies
Alle Bereiche Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certaBy nature, the above exaPoor
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaIn addition to those mentGood
Changed to include certaRegierung
The currentvon Drittstaa
definition Poor
does not make clear if the EU does not want to have th
Changed to include certaThere is no reason to exclude Average religious groups if the EU wants to take measu
Changed to include certaAnyone Es sollteutilising
keine Ausnah
the RegisterGoodthat could in any way be considered to be repre
Changed to include certa Good
Changed to include certaIt should include all ent Good
viene, di fatto, escluso il Changed to include certaincludere gli enti pubbliciGood
Changed to include certaPartis politiques (possib Good
Changed to exclude certa churches and religious cGood
Changed to include certaNo group should be exclGood
Sounds good per se, butChangedn to include certaThe Register will need toGood
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to exclude certa Member states should f Poor
Changed to include certaChurches and religious cNo opinion
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certapolitical parties No opinion
Must include all payement Changed to include certaShould apply to all entiti Poor
Changed to include certaMust include churches an Good
Changed to exclude certa overheidsdiensten kunnen No opinion
Changed to include certaAll organisations shoul Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl No opinion
Changed to include certaChiese, partiti politici, g Poor
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certaall entities mentioned a Good
Changed to include certaI believe that if any kin No opinion
I could wish to have inc Changed to include certain types of entities (pl No opinion
Changed to include certaReligious institutions ha Average
There are no activities coChanged to include certaJust add all parties invo Poor
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Kommunale Gebietskrper Average
Changed to include certaIt should be expanded toGood
Activities covered by th Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to exclude certa Everyone who can influeAverage
Changed to include certathe excluded entities ref Good
Changed to include certacatholic church in italy Average
Changed to include certaEvery special interest gr Average
Changed to include certachurches
Kommunale andGebietskrperschaften,
religious co Good ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Institutionen stellen auchAverage
die kommunalen Verwaltungen Ebenen der ffentlic
Changed to include certaChurches and religious co Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
So SOLLTE es zumindest Changed to include certaJEDE Organisation, Inte Average
Changed to include certaMember states governmen No opinion
Changed to include certaAll public parties should Average
Changed to include certaOrganizzazioni religiose Good
No opinion keine Ausnahmen, das ist Average
klar, auch Regierungsstellen knnen einseitig sein
Changed to include certa Good
Changed to include certaChurches and religious co Good
Changed to include certaAll entities, engaged in Good
Die Vertretung der im V Changed to exclude certa Den Kommunen
Kommunale und ihrePoor
k
Gebietskrperschaften, ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
Changed to include certaIn general, EU institutio Good
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen haben sich Average
in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Preserved the same as currently Poor
Disband politic as it is, No opinion http://www.coindesk.co Poor
No opinion No opinion
Changed to include certaMglichst alle Akteure Good
Changed to exclude certa Transparentcy is transparPoor
No opinion Good
What is indirect influenceChanged to include certaThe scope of Register s Poor
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaAs written in comment abPoor
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Nofields
Define lobbying for certain opinion Broaden the Transparency Average
Register to include journalists
Preserved the same as
You will need to clarify some definitions of who is Ascurrently
a lobbyist.
the journalism
We saw Average
profession
that in thecontinues
first roundtowhen
sufferthink
under tanks
the evolution
and law firms
in thedid
nen
No opinion
Other academics are clearly lobbying but think they Forare
example,
protectedin 2013,
by their Average
Corporate
university Europe
titles. For
Observatory
example,(CEO)
the IUCN
offered
Taskforce
to pay fo
fr
Action point: Define clearly
Changed
what types
to include
of activities
certaKommunale
Action
are considered
point Gebietskrperschaften,
create
as required
a section
Goodtoinopen
the ihre
transparency
a dossier in the
registry
Transparency
Zusammenschlsse for und
journalists
Register,
ihre whe
Verb
No opinion Average
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen haben sich Average
in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certa"certain entities, for ex Average
Pourquoi mettre "notam Changed to include certaLes partis politiques, l Good
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaMember States' governmen Average
Changed to exclude certa Local, municipal authoritAverage
No opinion Average
Provide the public with f Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
This statement misses equ Preserved the same as currently No opinion
Changed to exclude certa Kommunen und ihren komm No opinion
Changed to include certaEvery entity that wants t Good
Der Geltungsbereich we Changed to exclude certa Die kommunalen Gebietsk Average
As is typical of the EU, Changed to include certaYouKommunen, kommunalePoor
epitomise verbiage anZusammenschlsse und ihre Verbnde sowie deren
Der Umfang des Geltungsb Changed to exclude certa Den Kommunen und ihren Average
kommunalen Spitzenverbnden kommt neben Bu
No opinion
Toutes ces activits doivent faire l'objet d'une publicit
inclureprenne
les entits
intgre Goodla
religieuses
dans ; dcision.
Changed to include certainclure les organisations Good intergouvernementales internationales et leurs miss
Changed to include certaNo one should be exempAverage
Changed to include certaThe register should incluNo opinion
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to exclude certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certapolitical parties, labours, Average
It is necessary that all Changed to include certaAt least churches and reAverage
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaall entities need to be i Average
Changed to include certaChiese e comunit religioAverage
Changed to include certaAll entities Average
Changed to include certaChiese e comunit religi No opinion
Changed to include certachurches and religious cGood
No opinion Poor
Changed to include certaIt should basicly contain No opinion
Changed to include certatoutes
Kommunaleles parties prena No opinion ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
Gebietskrperschaften,
Preserved the same as currently Average
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen haben sich Average
in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Changed to include certaNegar la historia de la Average
No opinion No opinion
No opinion Average
Changed to include certaAlle entiteiten (maar me No opinion
Preserved the same as currently No opinion
Changed to include certatous ceux qui sont l'o Average
Aitec considers that all churches and religious communities, political parties,
Changed to include certaKommunale
Im Sinne hchstmgliche Good
Gebietskrperschaften, ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
No opinion There should be no excep
Average
It is also essential that all third country (ie those outside of the EU) governme
Der Rhein-Kreis Neuss sChanged to exclude certa Die Institutionen haben sich Average
in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
The definition of lobbyin Changed to include certaWe consider that all churches andtoreligious communities, political parties,corr
thir
Furthermore, the register Average
applies law firms but many refuse to register
No opinion It is also essential that allGood
third country (ie those outside of the EU) governme
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to exclude certa Den Kommunen
Furthermore, the und ihren
register No opinion
applies to law firms but many refuse to register corr
Changed to include certa Poor
Changed to include certaThe reason for excludingGood
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaInclude everyone excep Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Unter Interessenvertret Changed to exclude certa Kommunalbehrden undAverage St
Unter Interessenvertret Changed to exclude certa Kommunalbehrden undAverage St
Preserved the same as currently Average
Provided the definition c Changed to include certaAll lobbying should be r No opinion
Let's see the actual detaChanged to include certaEverything need to be reAverage
Preserved the same as currently Good
The definition is reasonaChanged to include certaThere should be no exceGood
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently No opinion
Preserved the same as currently No opinion
No opinion Kommunale Gebietskrperschaften,Good ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen haben sich Average
in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Changed to include certaf.i. regional public aut Good
Changed to include certaEverybody must be appl Average
To ensure the intent of Changed to include certaIt should apply to all p Good
Preserved the
Die interinstitutionelle Vereinbarung same as
zwischen currently
dem Europischen Parlament Goodund der Europischen Kommission enthlt bereits
Blaming" derer, die sich Changed include certaKommunale
complianttoverhalten. It should holdGebietskrperschaften,
member s Good ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
sollten aus dem Anwendungsbereich des Registers ausgenommen werden. G
No opinion Het register moet van Poor
toepassing worden voor alle lobbyende entiteiten, zoal
Institutionen stellen auch die kommunalen Verwaltungen Ebenen der ffentlic
Changed to include certaIt should coverall. NO No opinion
prachtige bedoeling maarChanged to include certaDie Institutionen haben sich Average
in den europischen
Registration in the Transparency Register should Vertrgen
depend solelyselbst
onverpflichte
the nature
Die weite Definition hat inPreserved the same zu
der Vergangenheit as Missverstndnissen
currently Good
gefhrt. Eine Vielzahl von Fllen,
insbesondere solche im Zusammenhang
Changed to exclude mit Wahlkampfveranstaltungen
certa
It is also essential that all der
Average
Abgeordneten
third des Europischen
country (ie those outside of theParlaments
EU) governme und
Lobbying takes place alsChanged to include certaEveryone should be incluPoor
Demokratisch gewhlte uChanged to exclude certa JFinally,
ede Form der Ausdehnun
the register Noto
applies opinion
law firms but many refuse to register correctly,
We consider that the defiChanged to include certa Average
Changed to include certaMainitut poikkeukset tul Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Diese Definition Changed
ist ausseems
unserer to include certa
Sicht nichtAlthough If
in allenThe you decide
Teilen such
angemessen. a regiPoor
The existing definition appropriate. it exclusion
uses broad publicGroe
ofterms (e.g.
bodies europische
Interest
(at whatever Interessenvertreter
representation)
level) is broadly wrden
that arelegitimate
not definedgleichg
andprec
ca
Changed to includevor.
Daher schlagen wir ein Drei-Stufen-Modell certa The register should
Organisationen, apply
die ein Good vor Ort in Brssel unterhalten, sollten sich v
Vertretung
So wrerefinements
Further sichergestellt, dass
Nodefinition
of the opinion
im Transparenzregister
are unlikely toDie
Primaausschlielich
gewhlten
produce dieentities
faciesignificant
all other Organisationen
Average
Volksvertreter
additionalin benefitsaufgefhrt
den kommunalen
undertaking and risk sind,
activities that die fr denthe
europisch
Gebietskrperschaften
simply fall
generating
under neh
uncertain
definition
Das Kapitel Muss ich mChanged to exclude certa Mit Blick u. a. auf kommunale Good Resolutionen, Konsultationsbeitrge, Brssel-D
We note that the current Changed
definition to include the
excludes certa an
Council
As intermediate

and Member,
step Average
States
any and
entity
other
of aEUtype
entities,
that issuch
currently
as theexcluded
European from
Supth
Changed to include certa Good
Changed to include certalaw firms Average
Preserved the same as currently No opinion
Changed to include certaInclure le plus grand no No opinion
No opinion Good
A spotkanie posa z min Changed to include certaNo dokadnie to pytanie Average
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaDifferent communities cou Good
Changed to include certaAll lobbying should be p Average
Changed to include certaAny organisation seekingNo opinion
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaLe registre ne doit fair Average
Changed to include certaKirchen und ReligionsgeAverage
Siehe 1.1. c bezgl. lang Changed to include certaJede Stelle muss klar in Poor
il registro deve essere c Changed to include certaTutte le organizzazioni, No opinion
Changed to include certaAlle Einrichtungen soll Good
Changed to include certaKommunale
Tutte le associazioni comNo opinion ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
Gebietskrperschaften,
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Institutionen stellen auchAverage
die kommunalen Verwaltungen Ebenen der ffentlic
Trustee Third Parties an No opinion Average
Changed to include certaI see no reason to excludGood
Leider zu wenig transpa Changed to include certaauf alle Personen und OrAverage
Changed to include certaAuch fr Kommunalbehrd Average
The definition is appropr Changed to include certaI see no reason to exclu Average
No opinion Average
Changed to include certaUK local authorities. At Good
Changed to include certaChurches, religious comm Good
Changed to include certacan't see why there's a No opinion
I would say yes, but as sChanged to include certaIt should include any entNo opinion
The register should also Changed to include certaI see of no reason why aAverage
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaIl semble impratif, puis
Kommunale Gebietskrperschaften, Average ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
Every meeting or appointm Changed to include certaEqual treatment for all Poor
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen
Kommunale haben sich Average
in den europischen
Gebietskrperschaften, Vertrgen selbst
ihre Zusammenschlsse verpflichte
und ihre Verb
Changed to include certaInstitutionen
Certain typesstellenof entities
auchGooddie kommunalen Verwaltungen Ebenen der ffentlic
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Average
Die Begriffe der "Lobby Changed to exclude certa Kommunen, kommunaleGood Zu
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certaSe debe incluir a las igl Good
Changed to include certaAll entities No opinion
The existing lobby registChanged to include certaIt should cover any orga Good
Changed to include certanatrlich um Religionsg No opinion
Changed to exclude certaThere are far too many wPoor
Only those with a hidde Changed to include certaOur politicians are publ Average
prepte, dvate tu ot Changed to include certakad, ktor chce Poor
Changed to include certachurches and religious cNo opinion
Changed to include certaAll entities should appl Average
Does this include freebi Changed to include certaAny organisation seekingNo opinion
Changed to include certain
All types
actorsofthatentities (pl Good
undertake lobbying or that are representing their own interests
Changed to include certa Average
Changed to include certaEs gibt keinen Grund, beGood
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaThe register should cont Good
No opinion No opinion
Changed to include certaAnyone who uses lobbyin Average
Voting is lobbying. Ever Changed to include certaIt should include everyo No opinion
Changed to include certaInclude churches and reliPoor
Changed to include certain types
1. All of entities
lobbyists (pl Average
and those are representing their own interests must register. C
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certa2. Law firms, PR firms and Goodthink tanks must be included in the mandatory lob
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaAll entities should be re Average
No opinion Average
Changed to include certaDepuis quand les groupes No opinion
Changed to include certaAll
tous services
actors that de l'Etat, Good
undertake lobbying or that are representing their own interests
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAlso law firms, PR firms and Average
think tanks should be included in the mandatory
It is surely axiomatic that all churches and religious communities, political par
Changed to include certain All
types of entities (pl No opinion
actors that undertake lobbying or that are representing their own interes
Changed to include certaOf course
It isAlso
alsolaw itfirms,
should
essential PRincl
that allGood
firms andcountry
third think tanks should
(ie those be included
outside of the in
EU)thegovernme
mandato
Changed to include certaAll lobbyists, without exception, Good should be required to register, whether actors
The definition of lobbyin Changed to include certaFurthermore,
Also law firms,the register
PR firms Good
applies to law
and think firms
tanks but many
should refuse to
be included register
in the corr
mandato
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certa Poor
Changed to include certaAll state and non state aAverage
Changed to include certajede Gruppierung, die verGood
Needs to be as strong asChanged to include certaANY lobbyist organisati Good
Changed to include certaEs sollte erweitert werd Poor
Changed to include certaMandatstrger mit einer Average
This definition is strong Changed to include certaAll actors actorsthat that
undertakeGood
undertake lobbying or that are representing theirow
Changed to include certaregister in order for citizens Poorto know the kind of activities and lobbying u
Changed to include certaJeder sollte sich eintra Average
Preserved the same as currently No opinion
Changed to include certaDas Register sollte fr Good
Changed to include certaJede(r) die (der) Einflu Good
Changed to include certaKirchen und ReligionsgeGood
Limit meetings with big bChanged to include certaAny Alland all entities
actors tha Good
that undertake lobbying or that are representing their own interes
Again. The solution is
Very strong definition. t Changed to include certano exceptions, no leak-hAverage
Changed to include certachurchesAlso law and religious
firms, cGood
PR firms and think tanks should be included in the mandato
All efforts should be made Changed
to resisttoany
include
demands
certato All
weaken
actorsit.that undertake Average
lobbying or that are representing their own interes
Changed to include certaGrundstzlich
Also law firms, sollte
PRJE Average
firms and think tanks should be included in the mandato
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certa Average
it covers SOME of the acPreserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaSoveltamisalaan pitisi l Good
Changed to include certaAll Kirchen,
actorsReligionsgemein
that undertake Nlobbying
o opinion or that are representing their own interests
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAlso law firms, PR firms and Average
think tanks should be included in the mandatory
A register does not stop Changed to include certaAt the very least, anyon No opinion
Definition should explici Changed to include certaIt should at least apply No opinion
Preserved the same as currently Good
It has to be clear who t Changed to include certaNo entities should be ex Average
This is a good definition Changed to include certaAll it should include ALL
who undertake en Poor
lobbying or that are representing their own interests should
Changed to include certa Average
Changed to include certaThere should be no exc Good
Changed to include certaAlle Akteure, die auf as Average
No opinion Good
Meetings with big busineChanged to include certaTougher rules should notNo opinion
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaAll Gerade
actorsauf
thatdieundertake
Politik Average
lobbying or that are representing their own interests
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAlso law firms, PR firms and No opinion
think tanks should be included in the mandatory
Changed to include certaEs sollten keinerlei G Average
Changed to include certaAll actors that undertakeAverage
Wieder eine schwammige Changed to include
Formulierung. certaIn
I. sieheAuf alle Einrichtungen
oben.
jedem Good Gruppen und Instititutionen erweitert werden,
Fall um all diejenigen
Changed to include certaVollumfnglich und ohneAverage jegliche Ausnahmen. Dies soll auch fr Entscheidu
Changed to include certaauf alle Average
Es sollte dahinter auch Changed to include certaEs sollten alle beinhalt Average
lobbyists have superior Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certaEZB Average
All actors that undertake lobbying or that are representing their own interes
Changed to include certaAll There should
actors that be no
Also law firms, PR firmsexclu
undertake Average
lobbying
and thinkor that
tanksare representing
should theirinown
be included the interests
mandato
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAlso law firms, PR firms and Average
think tanks should be included in the mandatory
No opinion Good
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certa All actors that undertake Average
lobbying or that are representing their own interes
Changed to include certaKirchen und Religionsg
Also law firms, PR firms Noandopinion
think tanks should be included in the mandato
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certa Average
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaLaw firms, PR firms, thinGood
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaRegister
Also law sind
firms,nicht
PR firms Poor wenn hierzu kein Anlass gegeben wird.
zu fhren,
Entweder unabhngige EU- No opinion Politik funktioniert auch ohne No opinion
Lobbyismus !!!
Changed to include certaAny person or organisatiGood
Any person or organisation that undertakes lobbying or that are representing
Changed to include certa Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAll actors that undertakeAverage
Changed to include certaEvery entity should be inPoor
This is a very good definChanged to include certaAny body regardless of Good
Changed to include certaKirchen und Religionsgem Average
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAll actors that undertakeGood
Changed to exclude certa Gerade die Einflunahme Good
Changed to include certaIntegrar TODO tipo de reGood
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaGltigkeit fr alle, um Average
Changed to include certaKirchen und ReligionsgeNo opinion
Die gewhlten Volksvertreter
Preserved the same as currently Goodin den kommunalen Gebietskrperschaften neh
No opinion Gemeinwohlinteresse entweder direkt oder ber ihre Verbnde Einfluss auf d
No lobbying
opinion
All actors that undertake
Rechtsetzungsprozess auf EU-Ebene. or Den
that are representing their own
Kommunalverbnden kommt interes
hier
Preserved the same as currently Alsoeine
law wichtige Good
firms, PRBndelungsfunktion
firms and think tanks
einen zu.should be included in
Die gemeinsamen the mandato
Positionen un
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaStellungnahmen werden Average in demokratischen Strukturen erarbeitet und einem
Changed to include certaalle, - sonst
internen machts ja Average
Beschlussfassungsprozess unterworfen. Zum anderen tragen sie da
Changed to exclude certain types
Sorge, of entities
dass auch die (plBelange
Average und Interessen finanzschwcherer Kommunen
No opinion eigene Europakoordinatoren bzw. -abteilungen gleichberechtigt Bercksichtig
No opinion
Changed to include certaDie Um gewhlten
findenalleknnen. Volksvertreter
Dies ist zu
die Einrichtungen in den kommunalen
unterscheiden
Good Gebietskrperschaften
von der Einflussnahme neh
durch privat
Gemeinwohlinteresse
Lobbyisten, die lediglich
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good entweder direkt oder
Partikularinteressen ber ihre
vertreten. Verbnde
Dass eineEinfluss
der auf
Ebene d
Rechtsetzungsprozess
im Multi-Level-Governance-System auf EU-Ebene. mit Den Kommunalverbnden
Lobbyisten gleichgestellt wird,kommtist hier
Changed to include certaEnsure
All actorsthat all who do loGood
einen eine that
insbesondere undertake
wichtige
vor dem lobbying or
Bndelungsfunktion
Hintergrund that
von are
zu.
Art. representing
4Die
Abs. gemeinsamen theirPositionen
own interests
2 EUV (Anerkennung un
der
Preserved the same as currently
Also law
Stellungnahmenfirms, PR firms
werden Good
and
in think tanks
demokratischen should be
Strukturen included
lokalen Selbstverwaltung) sowie von Art. 5 Abs. 3 EUV (Subsidiarittsprinzip) in
erarbeitetthe mandatory
und einem
Very strong definition. Changed to include certainternen All actors
nicht that undertake Good lobbying or unterworfen.
Beschlussfassungsprozess
nachvollziehbar. that are representing their own
Zum anderen interests
tragen sie da
A very good definition t Changed to include certaSorge, Mit Blickdassu. a.auch
auf kommunale Average
die Belange und Interessen
Resolutionen, finanzschwcherer Kommunen
Konsultationsbeitrge,
Changed to include certain eigene
typesEuropakoordinatoren
Brssel-Delegationen, bzw. -abteilungen
of entities (pl EU-Veranstaltungen
No opinion undgleichberechtigt
-Projekte wird zudem Bercksichtig
nach d
Changed to include certafinden
Wortlaut
wenn eine knnen.
der Dies istvzu Nounterscheiden
Umsetzungsleitlinien
Einrichtung opinion(S. 6 f.)von
vonderfastEinflussnahme
allen Kommunen durch
einprivat
Das Kapitel Muss ich mich registrieren?
Changed in den
to include Lobbyisten,
certaLeitlinien
Eintrag erwartet,
Smtliche zur die lediglich Partikularinteressen
einer enormen, nichtvertreten.
was zu Average
Entscheidungs Dass eine
gerechtfertigten der Ebene
Aufblhung de
im Multi-Level-Governance-System
interinstitutionellen Vereinbarung ber das Transparenzregister
Registers fhrenknnte mit Lobbyisten gleichgestellt
wrde. Aus verfassungspolitischen wird,
(siehe u. a. Art. 4 ist
und 5
Changed to include certaRegister bi se moral uporAverage
optimiert werden. Wenn Veranstaltungen in Bezug insbesondere
EUV,
auf Art.
Manahmen
28 GG, vor Art.
dem
oder71 Hintergrund
Verfahren von Art. 4Baden-Wrttemberg,
Landesverfassung Abs. 2 EUV (Anerkennung Art. 83 der
+
der EU organisiert werden, Changed
zu denento include certa
lokalen
Kommissionsmitglieder,
Verfassung ,
des
MdEP Good
Selbstverwaltung)
Freistaates
und deren sowie
Bayern,vonArt.
Art.845 Abs. 3 EUV (Subsidiarittsprinzip)
Verfassung des Freistaates Sach
Zwingend
Assistenten muss
oderauch VOR
Changed
EU-Beamte to include
eingeladen certaEs
wurden, und drfen
nicht
kann keinerlei
nachvollziehbar.
pragmatischen
es sich Ein
schlielich
GrndenAverage
auchistumeine Ausnahme der Kommunen (local author
Must not be weakened. Changed to include certa
reine Fachvortrge seitens der EU-Institutionen handeln, All
Mit lobbyists
Blick
sowie der u. a.should
auf be c
kommunale
dieVereinigungen
mit der No
undopinion
Resolutionen,
Netze, Konsultationsbeitrge,
die zu ihrer Vertretung gegrndet werde
Einflussnahme auf die Politikgestaltung
Changed to exclude Brssel-Delegationen,
auf EU-Ebene
certa
aus dem nichts
Anwendungsbereich
zu tun haben. EU-Veranstaltungen und -Projekte wird
Good des Transparenz-Registers zudem nach d
zwingend.
Changed to include certaWortlaut
das Register der Umsetzungsleitlinien
soll fr al No opinion(S. 6 f.) von fast allen Kommunen ein
Das Kapitel Muss ich mich No registrieren?
opinion in den Leitlinien
Eintrag erwartet,
zur was zu Average
einer enormen, nicht gerechtfertigten Aufblhung de
interinstitutionellen Vereinbarung ber das Transparenzregister
Registers fhren knnte
wrde. Aus verfassungspolitischen (siehe u. a. Art. 4 und 5
Preserved the same as currently Good
optimiert werden. Wenn Veranstaltungen in Bezug EUV,
auf Art.
Manahmen
28 GG, Art. oder71Verfahren
Landesverfassung Baden-Wrttemberg, Art. 83
Just having a list is ins Changed to include certa
der EU organisiert werden, zu denen Kommissionsmitglieder,Public Information
Verfassung des MdEP Act: aAverage
Freistaates
und deren Bayern, Art. 84 Verfassung des Freistaates Sach
Assistenten oder EU-Beamte Changed to include
eingeladen certaAlle
wurden, Auch
und
kannsollten aufgenommen
Anwaltskanzleien,
pragmatischen
es sich schlielich
GrndenGood
Firmen
auchistumzur
eineffentlichkeitsarbeit
Ausnahme der Kommunen und Denkfabriken
(local authorm
Nur,
reinewenn diese Bedinigu
Fachvortrge Changed
seitens to include certa
der EU-Institutionen handeln,
sowie der dieVereinigungen
mit der Good
und Netze, die zu ihrer Vertretung gegrndet werde
Einflussnahme auf die Politikgestaltung
Changed to excludeauf EU-Ebene
certa
aus dem nichts
Anwendungsbereich
zu tun haben. Good des Transparenz-Registers zwingend.
Changed to include certaAll every entities
actors that undertake Averagelobbying or that are representing their own interests
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAlso law firms, PR firms and Average
think tanks should be included in the mandatory
" Influer le processus d Preserved the same as currently Average
Er zou ook gekeken moeten worden en rekening gehouden moeten worden m
De omschrijving 'tot doelChanged
hebben' istoniet
include
goedcertain
De types
genoeg, pers
want of het
heeftentities
op
biedt (pl
deze ruimteAverage
manier aaneenontwijken
onevenredig
op grond grotevaninvloed
definitie.
op de
Hetpolitieke
bedrijfsl
Changed
Ondertussen oefenen ze invloed uit! to include certaKirchen und ReligionsgeGood
Dat zou bijvoorbeeld kunnen gebeuren door de media op te nemen in het reg
Het 'tot doel hebben' moet Changed
dus wegtoininclude
de omschrijving
certa voor wie het register Average
bedoeld is.
No opinion No opinion
Changed to include certain All types
actorsofthat entities (pl Poor
undertake lobbying or that are representing their own interests
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAlso law firms, PR firms
All actors that undertake lobbying and
Good think or
tanks
thatshould be includedtheir
are representing in the
own mandatory
interests
Changed to include certaAnwalts-Kanzleien; PR-Fi Good
Also law firms, PR firms and think tanks should be included in the mandatory
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certa Average
nicht nachvollziehbar.
Mit Blick u. a. auf kommunale Resolutionen, Konsultationsbeitrge,
Brssel-Delegationen, EU-Veranstaltungen und -Projekte wird zudem nach d
Wortlaut der Umsetzungsleitlinien (S. 6 f.) von fast allen Kommunen ein
Das Kapitel Muss ich mich registrieren? in den Leitlinien
Eintrag erwartet,
zur was zu einer enormen, nicht gerechtfertigten Aufblhung de
interinstitutionellen Vereinbarung ber das Transparenzregister
Registers fhren knnte
wrde. Aus verfassungspolitischen (siehe u. a. Art. 4 und 5
optimiert werden. Wenn Veranstaltungen in Bezug EUV, auf Art.
Manahmen
28 GG, Art. oder
71Verfahren
Landesverfassung Baden-Wrttemberg, Art. 83
der EU organisiert werden, Changed to include
zu denen certaTous
Kommissionsmitglieder,
Verfassungles acteurs
des
MdEP quiund
reprAverage
Freistaates
derenBayern, Art. 84 Verfassung des Freistaates Sach
Stop the questions
Assistenten aboutNo opinion
oder EU-Beamte Stop
eingeladen wurden,Registration
und kann alleslobbying.....it's
sichshould
pragmatischen schlielich Poor
be mandatory
Grndenauchistum forAusnahme
eine all that undertake lobbying (local
der Kommunen or thatauthor
are r
Must
reine be implemented
Fachvortrge asChanged
seitens der to include certa
EU-Institutionen Citizens
handeln,
sowie der should
die know
Vereinigungen
mit der what
Good
lobbying
und Netze, is being
die zu carried
ihrer
Diese Definition ist aus unserer Sicht nicht angemessen. Denn danach msste sich jede noch so kleine Organisation registrier out without
Vertretung exception
gegrndet inc
werde
Einflussnahme auf die Politikgestaltung
Changed to exclude
auf Under
EU-Ebene
certa
aus
Wir schlagen daher ein dreistufiges Modell vor. Organisationen dem the
nichts Irish Lobbying
Anwendungsbereich
zu tun haben. Act
Good you
des must register if
Transparenz-Registers
mit Bro in Brssel sollten you are carrying
zwingend.on
sich in jedem Fall registrieren. lobbying
Regi
Kommunale Gebietskrperschaften, ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
No opinion 1. You are communicating either directly or indirectly with a Designated Pu
Average
7
2. That communication is about a relevant matter and
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Institutionen stellen auchAverage die kommunalen Verwaltungen Ebenen der ffentlic
3. That communication is not specifically exempted and;
Le registre doit concerneChanged to include certaLe registre doit s'appliquGood
4. You are one of the following:
Changed to include certaAll entities should be
A professional in Good
lobbyist being paid to communicate on behalf of a client (w
Changed to include certaKommunalbehrden
application withund
du registre
An employer Kommunalverbnde
p Average
more than 10 employees where sind Regionalbehrden
the communications unda
Changed to exclude certa I dontA representative
see any interest body with at least one employee communicating on beh
Good
Das
Den AnRegister
advocacysolltebody
in sich kohrent
with at least sein. Es kann nicht
one employee willkrlich
that exists eine staatli
primarily to tak
Changed to exclude certa Ebene Kommunen
vom und ihren Good
Anwendungsbereich ausnehmen, eine andere aber davon erfass
Any
Changed to include certaalle Einrichtungen person communicating
Good about the development or zoning of land.
No opinion Wenn Goodund Verbnde sowie diplomatische Vertretunge
So for regionale Vertretungen
example churches may be required to register.
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certaDieThe Institutionen
The Register arehaben
following should sich
appl
Excepted in
or den
Average europischen
Exempted Vertrgen selbst
Communications and areverpflichte
not rega
Changed to include certaThere
should be
Private affairs no excluNo opinion
Gebietskrperschaften, ihrerZusammenschlsse und Verbnde vom
Changed to include certachurches Diplomatic relationscGood
and religious
Anwendungsbereich
types Factual information des Registers.
I would provide clear ex Changed to include certain of entities (pl No opinion
Changed to include certa
Alle Published
Akteure, diesubmissions
Wre jegliche unmittelbare und mittelbare Einflussnahme
Safetyerfasst, gbe esPoor
eigene
and security keine
Es sollte JEGLICHE
Ausnahmen (s.u.). FORMChanged to include certaEs gibt keinen Grund, waAverage
Parliamentary committees
Changed to exclude certa Communications byGood Designated Public Officials or public servants
Changed to include certaincludere
Kommunale anche
Governance organizz AverageState
Gebietskrperschaften,
of Commercial ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
bodies
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa .Die Institutionen
Policyhaben
Working sich
Average
in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Groups
Section 5 of the Irish Re Changed to include certaFurther information on these Average
exemptions is at page 7 of https://www.lobbying
No opinion No opinion
Kommunalbehrden und Kommunalverbnde sind Regionalbehrden und de
Preserved the same as currently
Das Register sollte in sich Good
kohrent sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich eine staatli
Changed to include certain Wenntypes
Alle Akteure,of entities
regionale (pl Average
die Vertretungen
im Eigeninteresse Lobbyarbeit
und Verbnde betreiben
sowie sollen eingeschlos
diplomatische Vertretunge
Sehr gute Defnition! DIe Changed to include certaDie Anwaltskanzleien,
Institutionen haben PR-Agenturen
Good
sich in denund Think-TanksVertrgen
europischen sollen eingeschlossen we
selbst verpflichte
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Gebietskrperschaften, ihrer GoodZusammenschlsse und Verbnde vom Anwend
Changed to exclude certa Si les autorits rgionaleGood
Diese Definition ist zie Changed to include certaALLE Akteure,
Alle Akteure, diedie
alsLobbya Noauftreten
Lobby opinion oder ihre eigenen Interessen vertreten,
Dies ist eine sehr gute Changed to include certaAuerdem sollten Anwaltskanzleien, Good PR-Agenturen und Think Tanks in ein ve
Lobbyvirksomhed og inter No opinion Average
vgl. Anmerkungen zu Pun Changed to include certaSoweit rechtlich mglich Average
Kommunalbehrden und Kommunalverbnde sind Regionalbehrden und de
Changed to include certaIt would
Das be useful
Register solltetoininsich
Average
kohrent sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich eine staatli
No opinion Die
All Bayerische
actors that undertake
Wenn regionale Vertretungen
Kommunalbehrden undGood
Staatsregierung
lobbying
undnimmt
or zur
that
Verbnde
Kommunalverbnde Kenntnis,
are dass their
representing
sowie aktuell
diplomatische own
sind Regionalbehrden von regiona
interests
Vertretunge
und de
All efforts should be ma Changed to include certaAlso law firms,
Die Institutionen
Das Register solltePR firms
haben and
Average
sich
in sich think tanks should
in den europischen
kohrent be included
sein. Es kannVertrgen in the
nicht willkrlich mandatory
selbst eine
verpflichte
staatli
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Die deutschen Lnder
Gebietskrperschaften,
Wenn regionale bilden
ihrer
Good
Vertretungen den
und Bundesrat
Zusammenschlsse
Verbnde und sind
und damit
VerbndeMitglieder
vom eines
Anwend
All actors that undertake lobbying or that are sowie diplomatische
representing their ownVertretunge
interests
Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen haben sich Good in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Als Trger hoheitlicher Aufgaben verfgen sie ber eigene Gesetzgebungszu
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAlso law firms, PR firms and
Good think tanks should
Auch Kirchen und Religionsgemeinschaften,
Kommunalbehrden und Kommunalverbnde be included
politische
sind in theRegierungen
Parteien,
Regionalbehrden mandatory
und de
Changed to include certaChurches
Das Register
Schon and religious
die grundstzliche cAverage
sollte in sichRegistrierungsmglichkeit
kohrent sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich
stellt eine
die Lnder staatli
funktion
Der gegenwrtigen, weitrChanged to include certaAuch Wenndie bisherige
regionale Unterscheidung
Average
Vertretungen zwischensowie
und Verbnde regionalen BehrdenVertretunge
diplomatische einerseits
Wre jegliche
Eine breite unmittelb
Definition Changed
spiegelt to exclude
die Vielfalt certa Die Institutionen
von Lobbyttigkeit
Gleichzeitig auf
darf haben
europischer
eine sich
Good in den europischen
Nichtaufnahme
Ebene angemessen Vertrgen
in das Register
wieder.
nicht selbst verpflichte
Gleichzeitig
dazu fhren,
mussdass
da
Kommunalbehrden und Kommunalverbnde sind Regionalbehrden und de
Changed to exclude certa No opinion
Das Register sollte in sich kohrent sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich eine staatli
Das wre eine schne Fo Changed to include certaWenn ALLE Organisationen,
regionale VertretungendiAverageund Verbnde sowie diplomatische Vertretunge
Cette dfinition est part Changed to include certaDie Toutes les entitshaben
Institutionen non gsich
Good in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Gebietskrperschaften, ihrer GoodZusammenschlsse und Verbnde vom Anwend
Changed to include certaWhere non-EU governments Poor
Changed to exclude certa In Deutschland kommt de Poor
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaA matter of equal treatm Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
No opinion Average
Changed to include certaThe scope of the RegisteAverage
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaQui dit largissement dit Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
There is however also a Preserved the same as currently
Den Lokalen Behrden und Good
den Kommunalverbnden kommt bei ihrer Einflu
Changed to include certainternen
all organisations must beAverage
Beschlussfassungsprozess unterworfen; sie bercksichtigen auch d
Changed to exclude certasowie deren Vereinigungen Good
und NetzeAnwendungsbereich aus dem Anwend
No opinion Average
Changed to include certapolitical parties, intern Average
Changed to include certaAll group of interest, wh Average
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
A definition is one thing Changed to include certaAny entity which seeks t Good
Preserved the same as cThere are very good rea Average
Changed to include certaServiciile guvernamentalAverage
Preserved the same as currently Good
No opinion Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certachurches and religious cGood
Changed to include certaThe Register should incl Good
Stimme der Definition zuChanged to include certaJede Vor-Ort Vertretung No opinion
Changed to include certaInclure glises, pays ti Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaAll entities should be c Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaEvery organization have Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
The EU officials should Changed to include certaEvery single entity shoulPoor
Changed to include certaShould include internati Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Poor
Preserved the same as currently Good be excluded. We have the right to know who i
I don't see why anyone should
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Poor
Please make sure that thChanged to include certa No opinion
Changed to exclude certaall representatives of in Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaECTAA believes that ethiAverage
Changed to include certaBecause of the instituti Good
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaAll relevant entities sh No opinion
No opinion Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certachiese comunit religiose, Average
Changed to include certaI think it should include Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaAll the above entities. Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
I mezzi di comunicazioniPreserved the same as cMantenuto a condizione Average ch
Changed to include certaLes glises et communau Good
Changed to include certaincludere le organizzazion Good
Preserved the same as currently
Israel er det eneste land Good
med en srlig aftale med EU - derfor er deres firma
Preserved the same as currently Good
Hvis Tyrliet fr lignende skal det ogs registreres. Ellers bliver der nemt flere
Hber man kan se om det Changed
e to include certaVil man have indflydelse,Good
m der glde samme normer for alle.
No opinion Average
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certaThe Regisiter should apply Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certaPolitical parties, nation Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certathird countries governmen Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certaInternational Intergover Good
The register should also Changed to include certaIf transparency is the g Average
Changed to include certaTo include other entities Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Wie unter Nr. 2.1 vorgeschlagen, erstreckt sich der Geltungsbereich des Reg
This depends on whetherChanged to include certaChurches and religious cGood
No abarca todas las acti Changed to include certaDebe ampliarse progresiAverage
VORSCHLAG:
Changed to include certaKonstitutionelle Manahmen Goodentwickeln und beschlieen, welche absolut alle
Changed to include certaAll organisations with lo Good
No opinion It doesn't stop those wi Poor
Die Lobbyisten, AbgeordNo opinion Fuck die Politiker, Abg No opinion
Often it is unclear who f No opinion The politicians should b Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaAll should be included e Poor
Changed to include certaThe Register should incl Good
Changed to exclude certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certashould include political Average
Changed to include certaall lobbying parteis shoulAverage
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaAll organisations that ar Good
Changed to include certaAll entities that attempt Average
Changed to include certaEveryone engaged in lobb Good
Changed to include certaShould include everyoneAverage
Preserved the same as currently Good
The European Commission and European Parliament will be aware that loca

We believe it is inappropriate for the EU institutions to classify democratically


Changed to include certaThe register should incl Good
Multi-level governance and subsidiarity have been at the heart of EU decision
Changed to exclude certain types of entities (pl Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Local and regional authorities receive a mandate from their local citizens and
Changed to include certaIt should include church Average
Changed to exclude certa Finally, in order to gain economies
No opinionof scale and to speak with a single, cohere
Changed to exclude certain types of entities (pl Average
No opinion Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certaMost entities should be i Good
No opinion No opinion
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaKoci w Polsce ma spoGood
Political parties, regionalAverage
public authorities and their representative offices mu
The influence of scienceNo opinion
No opinion It is also essential that allGood
third country (ie those outside of the EU) governme
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certain types of entities
Furthermore,
Kommunalbehrden (plundAverage
the register applies to law firms however
Kommunalverbnde many refuse to und
sind Regionalbehrden registe
de
The definition of lobbyin Changed to include certaDas Register sollte in sich Average
kohrent sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich eine staatli
Preserved the same as currently
Wenn regionale Vertretungen Average und Verbnde sowie diplomatische Vertretunge
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen haben sich Good in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to exclude certa Social Partners at EU le No opinion
Preserved the same as currently
Changed to include certain Good types of entities.
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaSome governmental
All actors inforAlobbying
that undertake verage or that are representing their own interests
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaThe
Also current
law firms, PR firms
process and
Poorthink
requires tanksregardless
all firms, should beofincluded in the mandatory
size or frequency of enga
No opinion Good
Changed to exclude certa Potential solutions could Good be: (a) a minimum entry on the register simply to ge
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
ALTER-EU considers that all churches and religious communities, political pa
Changed to include certashould include churches No opinion
Die Definition des Geltu No opinion It is also essential that allAverage
third country (ie those outside of the EU) governme
No opinion Good
The definition of lobbyin Changed to include certaFurthermore, the registerAverage applies to law firms but many refuse to register corr
It is essential that all third country (ie those outside of the EU) governments s
Preserved the same as cI do not think it will b Average
Changed to include certainteraction
Additionally,with
CEO polical Good
considers that all churches and religious communities, poli
Preserved the same as cIl Registro deve avere caGood
We consider that the defiChanged to include certaFinally, the register applies Poor to law firms but many refuse to register correctly,
Changed to include certaincluding : churches & reAverage
Changed to include certaIo lo applicherei anche aiGood
Yes this is how it should Changed to include certachurches and religious cPoor
Changed to include certaIt should include
All actors all ent Average
that undertake lobbying or that are representing their own interes
Preserved the same as currently
Also law firms, PR firms Average
and think tanks should be included in the mandato
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaMenim, da bi se morale tudi Average
verske skupnosti, politine stranke, vlade tretjih d
Preserved the same as currently Good
Public shouldlobiranja
Ta definicija know which Changed
oziroma to include
zastopanja certaChurch
interesov je enashould
Registracija be biti
najboljih
mora include
plati Average
obvezna
sedanjega tudi za
registra
odvetnike
lobiranja
pisarne;
in jo jemnoge
na vsakodnain
teh seda
po
Changed to include certa Average
fucking jewish plague !! Changed to exclude certa throw fucking jewish pla Poor
Comments:
Brssel-Delegationen, EU-Veranstaltungen und -Projekte wird zudem nach d
nicht
All nachvollziehbar.
churches and religious communities, political parties, third
Wortlaut der Umsetzungsleitlinien (S. 6 f.) von fast allen Kommunen ein
Mit Blickgovernments,
country u. a. auf kommunale and Resolutionen,
regional public Konsultationsbeitrge,
authorities and their Aufblhung
representative
Das Kapitel Muss ich mich registrieren? in den Leitlinien
Eintrag erwartet,
zur was zu einer enormen, nicht gerechtfertigten de
Brssel-Delegationen,
should register if they EU-Veranstaltungen
are undertaking und -Projekte
lobbying/ representing wird zudem nach d
interinstitutionellen Vereinbarung ber das Transparenzregister
Registers fhrenknnte
wrde. Aus verfassungspolitischen (siehe u. their
a. Art. own intere
4 und 5
Wortlaut
to the der Umsetzungsleitlinien
definition provided. There is (S.
no 6 f.) von fast
rationale for allenexclusion:
their Kommunen ein of th
some
optimiert werden. Wenn Veranstaltungen in Bezug EUV,
auf Art.
Manahmen
28 GG, Art. oder 71Verfahren
Landesverfassung Baden-Wrttemberg, Art. 83
Eintrag
(eg erwartet,
between a city wasand zu einer enormen, nicht gerechtfertigten Aufblhung de
der EU organisiert werden, zu denen Kommissionsmitglieder,Verfassung des
MdEP und aderen
Freistaates regional
Bayern, government) are arbitrary,
Art. 84 Verfassung and it is also
des Freistaates cle
Sach
Das Kapitel Muss ich mich registrieren? in den Leitlinien
Registers
of these zurfhrenhave
entities wrde. Aus verfassungspolitischen
'interests' and there is a strong (siehe
public u. a. Art. in
interest 4 und 5
citizen
Assistenten oder EU-Beamte eingeladen wurden,und kann pragmatischen
es sich schlielich Grnden auchistum eine Ausnahme der Kommunen (local author
interinstitutionellen Vereinbarung
Preserved ber das Transparenzregister
EUV,
what
the same as handeln,
currentlyArt. 28
lobbying GG,
knnte
they Art. 71
carry Landesverfassung
out.
No opinion Baden-Wrttemberg, Art. 83
reine Fachvortrge seitens der EU-Institutionen sowie der dieVereinigungen
mit der und Netze, die zu ihrer Vertretung gegrndet werde
optimiert werden. Wenn Veranstaltungen in Bezug Verfassung
It auf Manahmen
is also des Freistaates
essential oderallVerfahren
Bayern, Art.(ie84those
Verfassung
outside des Freistaates Sach
Einflussnahme auf die Politikgestaltung
Changed to exclude auf EU-Ebene
certa
aus dem
nichts zu tunthat
Anwendungsbereichhaben. third
Good country
des Transparenz-Registers of zwingend.
the EU) governme
der EU organisiert werden, zu denen Kommissionsmitglieder,und
also pragmatischen
be covered MdEP by undGrnden
the derenist and
register, einerequired
Ausnahme der Kommunen
to register. Furthermore,(local the
author
lob
Assistenten oder EU-Beamte Changed to exclude
eingeladen certa
wurden, D en Kommunen
sowie
kann der
es sich und ihren
Vereinigungen
schlielich Good
und
auchNetze,
firms and law firms employed toum
lobbydie thezuEU ihrer Vertretung
institutions ongegrndet
behalf of third werde co
Auf
reineden
The erstenofBlick
Fachvortrge
definition sc Changed
seitens
lobbying / interesttorepresentation
exclude certa
der EU-Institutionen D erthe
handeln,
aus Deutsche
dem
governments,
in die Verein
Anwendungsbereich
lobby mit der
register
or for
to promote
is Good
one des Transparenz-Registers zwingend.
ALTER-EU considers that allof
their
theimage,
churches andshould be required
religious to declare
communities, all suc
political pa
Einflussnahme
strongest auf die
elements Changed
of the to include
Politikgestaltung
present set-up. auf certain
AllEU-Ebene
efforts types
Furthermore,
should ofbeentities
nichts zu (plresist
tunregister
made
the haben.
to Poor
applies
any demands
to law firms but many refuse to register corr
to weaken it. Changed to exclude certa although some do. It is Good
imperative
It is also essential that all third country to find(ieathose
solution so that
outside lawEU)
of the firmsgovernme
which lo
Changed to include certaregister. A legally-bindingAverage register is the obvious long-term solution.
No opinion The specificitythe
Furthermore, of register
some Average applies to law firms but many refuse to register corr
The definition of lobbyin Changed to include certa Average
a Definition is not realit Changed to include certaall entities, church, Ch No opinion
No opinion Average
No opinion Average
Changed to include certaBeing a member of the TrGood
Die interinstitutionelle No opinion Poor
No opinion Average
not covered in the defini Changed to include certaall influencing/advising Poor
No opinion Average
No opinion Average
No opinion Average
it is very interesting to No opinion Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to exclude certain types of entities (pl Good
La notion d'influence es Changed to include certatoutes les organisations Good
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaall lobbying activities i Good
Changed to include certaChurches and religious Poor
Preserved the same as currently Good
The catch-all use of "dir Changed to include certaIn the current political Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaANY entity involved in l Poor
No opinion Good
No opinion Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Lobbying also relates to Changed to include certaIt seems strange that locAverage
Information responsibilit Changed to include certaIn principle all initiativ Average
Changed to include certa1. OnlyDer governments
NABU ist der of MS, Average dass alle Kirchen und Religionsgemeinsch
Auffassung,
Die Definition von LobbyChanged to include certa2. Gleiches gilt fr PR-Agenturen, Average Anwaltskanzleien, etc., die beauftragt si
The Register should cover Changed to include certaAny persons or entities wGood
Changed to include certaThere should be no excep Average
Changed to include certales partis
1. Der NABU
Kommunen politiques,
undist ihre l No opinionSpitzenverbnde
derkommunalen
Auffassung, dass alle Kirchensollten und Religionsgemeinsch
von der Pflicht zu
Changed to include certa2. les partis politiques,
Gleiches
Den Kommunen und ihrengilt frl Nokommunalen
opinion Anwaltskanzleien,
PR-Agenturen, Spitzenverbnden etc.,kommt
die beauftragt
neben Bu si
Die Definition von LobbyChanged to include certaDie gewhlten Volksvertreter Averagein der kommunalen Gebietskrperschaften sind
Changed to exclude certa Die kommunalen Spitzenverbnde Average arbeiten auf Grundlage von politischen Be
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Listen to the citizen of Changed to include certaInclude all , no exeptati Poor
Influential individuals an Changed to include certaAll parties lobbying pol Good
Changed to include certaAll examples mentioned Good
Changed to include certaLes Etats Membres devraie Good
No opinion Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaJegliche Firma/Person, dAverage
Changedbetween
The inter-institutional agreement to exclude
thecertaAll the bodies
European representi
Parliament and the Average
European Commission already contains a very br
No opinion Average
The EU institutions should Noactively
opinionpromote a culture of compliance and work Good towards ensuring that register entries are in acco
No opinion The register should coverPoor consultants, consultancy companies (including PR,
The definition of lobbyingChanged to include certaPolitical parties, all levelsGood of EU or non-EU government including local, munic
No opinion Average
Kommunalbehrden und Kommunalverbnde sind Regionalbehrden und de
No opinion Das Register sollte inund
Kommunalbehrden sichAverage
kohrent sein. Es kann
Kommunalverbnde sindnicht willkrlich eineund
Regionalbehrden staatli
de
Strenge Regeln sollten Changed to include certaAlle Wenn
Das sollten
Register sich
regionale eintr
Vertretungen
sollte in sichGood und Verbnde
kohrent sowienicht
sein. Es kann diplomatische
willkrlich Vertretunge
eine staatli
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Die
Wenn
Die Institutionen
regionale
Stadt
KommunalbehrdenPforzheim haben undsich
Vertretungen
setztGood inund
sich denVerbnde
dafreuropischen sindVertrgen
ein, dasssowie
Kommunalverbnde selbstVertretunge
diplomatische
kommunale verpflichte
Gebietskrperscha
Regionalbehrden und de
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen haben sich
Good in den europischen Vertrgen
Das Register sollte in sich kohrent sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich eine selbst verpflichte
staatli
Das Kapitel Muss ich mChanged to exclude certa Nebenregionale
Wenn der erluterten verfassungspolitischen
VertretungenAverage und Verbnde sowieVerankerung der kommunalen
diplomatische Vertretunge
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen haben sich Good in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Geltungsbereich ist un Changed to exclude certa vKommunale
om Anwendungsverfahren Average
We would like to adjust the definition to the one that In the
is used inGebietskrperschaften,
IIA 2014 the
thecurrent
following
IIA, ishereby ihre Zusammenschlsse
statedincluding
on regional
'all authorities: und ihreofVerb
institutions' instead solely
Preserved the same as currently Average
Die
''(...)weite Definition
all activities, ha than
other Changed
those to exclude
referred to certaDie Institutionen
in paragraphs
Article 10 to haben
16. Regional sich
12, carriedAverage
public in den
witheuropischen
authorities
out theand
objective
theirsindVertrgen
directly selbst
representative
ofRegionalbehrden verpflichte
or indirectly
offices areinflu
no
Kommunalbehrden und Kommunalverbnde und de
Preserved the same as currently Good
Das Register sollte in sich kohrent sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich eine staatli
We would like to encourage Changed
the Commission
to include certa
to include
In
Wennarticle
a clause
17, all that
regionale sub-national
prohibits
VertretungenAverage
public
unregistered
authorities,
und Verbnde lobbyists
otherdiplomatische
sowie entrance
than regional
to itsVertretunge
authorities
premises.
Changed to include certaDie All churches
Institutionenand haben
religiouAverage
sich in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Gebietskrperschaften, ihrer GoodZusammenschlsse und Verbnde vom Anwend
Kommunalbehrden und Kommunalverbnde sind Regionalbehrden und de
Changed to exclude certain types of entities
Das Register sollte in sich (pl Nokohrent
opinion sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich eine staatli
No opinion Good
Wenn regionale Vertretungen und Verbnde sowie diplomatische Vertretunge
The scope for dishonestyChanged to include certaDie it should include haben
Institutionen everyo sichNo opinion
in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Gebietskrperschaften, ihrer GoodZusammenschlsse und Verbnde vom Anwend
Changed to include certaFavoriser le principe d'qGood
La notion de "indirectemeChanged to exclude certa L'exclusion des glises Good
Why limiting to CommissiChanged to include certaAll entities must be incl No opinion
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently
Die derzeitige Regelung,Good die die Kirchen und Religionsgemeinschaften aus d
No opinion Average
Es wre angemessen, dePreserved the same as cDie aktuelle Regelung spiegelt Good die Vielfalt von Kontakten gut wieder, die die E
Changed to include certareligious institutions sh Good
I am simply unqualified toNo opinion Again I feel I am unqual Average
Changed to include certaQualsiasi tipo di organiz Average
Daimler bekennt sich zu No opinion Average
Changed to include certaEs sollten alle Organis Good
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaVanno incluse le cooperat No opinion
The
Preserved the same as currently COMECE Secretariat is registered in the Transparency Register since 20
Good
Changed to include certaall interest groups shou Good
Changed to include certaThe quality to
it is difficult and quantity Average
unders of registrations that took place under Section V since
Sarebbe come dire anche Changed to exclude certa Perch p riportato solo No opinion
The approach according to which the Register does not apply to Churches an
Changed to include certaAs the more types of entiAverage
Changed to include certachanged
Due to thetolegal include all tyAverage
framework enshrined in the Treaties and under which Church
Changed to include certaAll the above should be oGood
We would consider it appPreserved the same as cArticle 17(1) of the TreatyGood on the Functioning of the EU provides that The Un
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaChurches, religious comm Poor
Changed to include certaAt least international i Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
The EU Transparency Register aims to make the influence of interest represe

that sense it is more than a lobby register and should cover all actors that ha

decision-making.
Kommunalbehrden In addition, since the definition
und Kommunalverbnde sindincludes both direct and
Regionalbehrden undindide
Das Register sollte in sich kohrent sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich eine staatli
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa also
Eine take into accountzwischen
Unterscheidung where certain actors advance the causebei of den
lobbyists w
Kommunalbehrden undGood Einzelkommune
Kommunalverbnde sindundRegionalbehrden
Verband Eintrag
und de
Preserved the same as currently Wir
Dassind der
Register Meinung,
sollte dassGood Kommunen, kommunale Zusammenschlsse und
Transparency International welcomes the broad definition transparent. of lobbying
This is in onsich
the case,
which kohrent
for EUsein.
theexample, Es
forkann
Transparency nicht
embassies willkrlich eine staatli
of third countries. T
Changed to exclude certa Die Kommunen
Wenn regionale sind direkt
Vertretungen Good vorund Ort Verbnde
erster Ansprechpartner
sowie diplomatische fr Brgerinnen
Vertretunge un
The
Wre register
jegliche does not distinguish
unmittelb Changed lobbying
to activits
exclude from intergovernmental
certa Die COSLA
Institutionen is more negotiations.
haben than happy
sich
Good in denthat our meetingsVertrgen
europischen with EU officials,selbst MEPs, et
Register
Le registre is built.
porte notamment sur les de interests
divers of their
groupes debusiness
pression*, community
representants or individual
d'intrt,companies
de plaidoyer Il verpflichte
(national
couvre cham
tou
*Politique Changed to include certa The same obligations shou Average
Section
The 2.2. incorrectly
Register should continuestates that
to Regional
include all public
external authorities
on Neither the and UK their
or Scottish
representative Parliament offices transparency
doshould
not havestandards
to register treat
but can
us ar
Groupe de pression, Preserved
organe de the same
dfense as currently
d'intrts ouinfluence.
EU dedecision
valeurs, As and
such,
qui law-making
essaiethird
Good country
par should
divers embassies
be made
moyens transparent
(campagnes, in thedirecte,
action same way
pr
Preserved the same as cS'il doit y avoir transpa Good
It
beshould
included exclude
on theALL list local,
of No regional authorities
organisations seeking to and NGOs, their
COSLA,
influence official
EUordecision-making
companies bodies
indeedor tradesuch
our sister
as COSLA.
unions. organisations
that should be in other Member States, does
opinion Good
This distinction plainly makesNo opinionno sense as a region Where isWe nonational
less
do not a democratically
have anyAverage
private elected
or voluntary
tier EUof government
body within as ourRegister
local
membership.
governmen
covered by the register. registers are missing, the Transparency should a
The register should incl Changed to include certaIt should include all poli Good
In
The Scotland
definition theofunitary
interestauthorities
No opinionhave an
representation average
should potential
sizeWe ofhave
167,000 ainfluence
publicpeople law with
statute
Good the and
smallestourMember
employees
about 4States times
are services
the
bound average
byatsame sizethe of
Transparency International welcomes the broadnot definition
The be made
EU lobby
any
Transparency
of lobbyingmore restrictive.
on coming
Register
which the Transparency
through
aimsEUto Transparency
make the influence Register ofisinterest
built. national
represe
The Register should Changed
continue to include
to elected
include certadovrebbe
all external Where influence. includere
national As registers
such, tuttithirdAverage
are country
missing,
We are
Registeret all public
International has
giver democratically
observed
ikke i how
Changed in the
to UK,institutions
include for example,
certa We
Det withOur
see
giveraan employees
them equal
definition
ingen obligation
taking
meningthat are
on is directly
to
positions
atoo
Average ofembassies
thataccountable
restrictive
of thetheEuropean
their has
EU to
national
led
Transparency
should
toanchampions be included
aParliament
elected Register
member on
ortoimportant
should
representthe list
assembly oua
ind
The scope
The definition of interest
of the activities representation should not
that lead to registration Allshould
beorganisations
made be anymore more
that
clearly restrictive.
currently
defined. fall
Transparency
under
That is the scopeInternational
of particular of relevance
the registerhas observed
for should
lawyers, rem
hoa
Aus
In
The Sicht
light
term desoriginal
of rules
the GDV and
advocacy istspirit
diChanged
of the
policy to include certa
Transparency
implementation are Erweiterung
Register,
Someambiguous auf
organisations,
Transparency allecontext
inaregister.
that Int
law Average
International
firms and consultancies,
reiterates that the
inCommittee
particular,
current register
still refuse
shouldto s
new
We strongly
situation where were
agree
lesswithoriginally
thanthe1% geared
broad
of the towards
definition
lobbyists andmaking
are scope covered
We
All COSLA
transparent
believe
of the
organisations
by the is
there
register nominating
any
areinundue
that clearly
that
currently itas theyof
influence
body
covers
somefall cover
the
common-sense
indirect
under such
theEuropean
big
the and
scope activities
corporate
direct
exemptions
of the as
lobbying well.
interests
register ofAlso
of
andmight
the the
Regions
officials
we
should wor
exert
largel
an
rem
We welcome the
Furthermore, paragraph No
broad definition opinion of lobbying as defined
7 of the Interinstitutional We support
Agreement by the a EUmandatory
considers Transparency
even Average
register Register
that applies
the preparation as ofit to
includes
all entities
letters, any seeking
information entity seeking to represe
material toorr
The
By CCBE
doing acknowledges Changed
that to include
theTransparency
Guidelines certa
have Oxfam attemptedmaintains toand thatformally
address all those
entities
Average undertaking
concerns, inbut lobbying/
in the form representing
ofpoliticians
ofan theirEU
administrative own did
The
In light of this
register the we
as it have
original been
currently
spirit ofunfairly
stands
the onlypenalised
requires here organisations
lobbyists
Register, The and We our
are
Register
to collective
already
disclose
Transparencydoes responsibility
their
however
entities meetingsregistered
need
International
from toreiterates
with
within bring
clearly
MEPs,
the the
togetherCommittee
define
European local
Commissioners,
that common-sense
Union the
that Regions
cabinets
do and as
exemption
not and
have ao
The CCBE considers thatChanged a satisfactoryto include
definition
certaAs of a lobbying
rule, anythat activityaddresses
f No opinion the abovementioned concerns is formulated in t
Where national registers are about
missing, the EUprovisions
Transparency Register should
It
The
theis current
unfortunate
PRCA has thatshould
long
register this Changed
arguedhas notcome
thatbethe toatUK
exclude
merelya timefocuswhen
Registercerta
onWe there
oflobbying, are but
Consultant
appreciate
law-making strong questions
Lobbyists
that
process,
should the Average
register
inmoveshould
particular, has
cover
to include the future
specific
should special
andremain
link and viability
political
under advisers
to
the ofscope
the(SPADs)
exempt EU ofto some
organisation
the as
regis thae
Changed to include certa Average
All organisations that currently fall under the scope of the register should rem
information on EU decision-making. Changed to include certalobbying to convince the Average institutions that they are indeed not lobbyists.
Preserved the same as currently Of particular concern for Oxfam No opinionas a development NGO are the firms working
No opinion Average
Oxfam welcomes the broad Changed to include certaFinally, some organisations, Averagelaw firms and consultancies, in particular, still ref
No opinion Average
Registration in the Transparency Register should depend solely on the nature
Changed to include certaIt There
is also is no rationale
essential thatfoallAverage
third country (ie those outside of the EU) governme
Transparency International welcomes the broad definition
The EUthe Transparency
of register
lobbyingapplies onRegister
which the
aimsEUto Transparency
make the refuse
influence
Register ofisinterest
built. represe
We consider that the defiChanged to include certa Finally, Good to law firms but many to register correctly,
The Register should continue to include all external Whereinfluence.
national As registers
such, third arecountry
missing, embassies
the EU Transparency
should be included Register onshould
the lista
needs more of interest Changed
The definition representation to include
should certa
not all
Allbeshould
madebe
organisations any in more
it that restrictive.
Poor fall
currently Transparency
under the scope International
of the register has observed
should rem ho
O registo
In light of theapenas
originaluma Changed
d of the Transparency
spirit to include certa Register,Toda eorganisations,
Some qualquer
Transparency activid law Good
International
firms and consultancies,
reiterates that the in particular,
current register still refuseshouldto s
Changed to include certaIMir thinksind the register
keine Grnde shouersichtlich,
Good die allgemeine Ausnahmen rechtfertigen w
Changed to include certaFalls es solche Grnde im Average
Einzelfall gibt, knnten sie ja anstelle detaillierter A
pour certains groupes l'i Changed to include certaPlus aucune exclusion Average
"Jegliche EinflussnahmeChanged to include certaIm Rat oder ZT auch im Parlament Average vertretenen Einrichtungen spielen als Mitg
Changed to include certa Som
Kirchen
The current definition of lobbying is not precise enough and does not provide sufficient registret
und r idag
ReligionsgeGood uppmanas kommuner och deras
legal certainty. sammanslutningar
There should be a new att
The current definition does not offerthe a sufficiently Sverige har inte
clear exemption for legalGood ett hierarkiskt system mellan kommun och
work that is a legitimate business activity for law firm landsting/region. D
Preserved same as currently
- contacts with public No bodies to better inform clients SKL anser drfr
about a general att det r
legal fel att gra tskillnad av demokratiskt folkvalda int
opinion Die derzeitige Regelung, diesituation
Good die Kirchen or theirundspecific legal position, or toaus
Religionsgemeinschaften advis d
- advice given to clients to help them ensure their Frbundet
activities anser
comply att kommissionen
with the relevant skyndsamt
law undantar kommuner och dera
Changed to include certaVertretungen CECCM
Pon samma supports und Krperschaften,
stt som a mandato Average
medlemsstaternas
Bros und Netzwerke, die geschaffen wurd
representationer, regeringar eller nati
-Bardzo preparation of ciseChanged
analyses and studies for clients den theRejestrem
potential
EU-Organen zuimpact of opinion
reprsentieren,any legislativesowie ihre or regulatory
Verbndechanges erfasst, with wird regard
sowoh
wane jest to exclude certa O
SKLbjcievill pminna Rady
kommissionen No om att kommuner och landsting/regioner r e
- representation on behalf of clients in the context of a conciliation
ffentlichen Kontrolleorderjenigen, mediation die procedure
im Umfeld to prevent a dispute from
der europischen being
Institutione b
- Changed to exclude
activities relating to litigation on behalf of clients, certa particularly the No opinion
Selbstverstndis derexercise
Kirchen of und theReligionsgemeinschaften
fundamental right of a client to a fair trial,
gerecht.
- work that directly relates Preserved the same
to a specific legalasor currentlyadministrative case or procedure Good which does not seek to change the existin
Also, the definition should Changed
not include to include certain
the actions of types
an of
individualentitiesor (pl
organisation
Die aktuelle Regelung spiegelt die Vielfalt von Average responding to an approach
Kontakten gutbywieder,
a public diebody
die E t
In light
Es wreofangemessen,
the above, weden Changed
welcome the
to include
Councilcerta
Anwendungsbereich of des
Europe We Registers
think
Vertreter definition:
thatden
zu the
auch lobbyinGood
lobbying
auf den means
gesellschaftlichen Ministerrat promoting
Gruppen specific
als Mit-Gesetzgeber
und interests byunterhalten.
Organisationen communica
auszudehnen. Preserved the same as cdass diese vielfltigen Kontakte, Good transparent sind.
Changed to include certaAll the above. Governmen Good
Die interinstitutionelle No opinion Poor
Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR), and its members fu
Die interinstitutionelle No opinion Poor
Changed to include certain Furthermore, we see thatPoor
types of entities (pl the Register is incoherent in its approach in that re
Changed to include certaAs Derlegitimate
DZV untersttzt actors in einEuropean
Average governance and recognised by EU Treaties
The definition needs to Changed to exclude certa Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl No opinion
The TR after the last revision widened the scope of those covered: this was a positive move. However, it is NOT true to say it c
Despite the attempts of the Changed
Commission
to include
to clarify
certaTransparency
the meaning of does
some notlobbying
sto
Good activities in the guidelines, there still remains
It should also cover all Changed to include certaIt should include ALL entAverage
The EU Transparency Register aims to make the influence of interest represe
Transparency International Preserved
welcomes thethe
same
broadas definition
currently
We do not
Where ofsee
national aregisters
lobbyingreason Average
to
on which
areexclude
missing,
the EU any types
Transparency
the of entities
EU Transparency fromRegister
Register the
is TR. should
built. All intera
Changed to include
The Register should continue to include all external certain types of
All influence. entities
organisations As such, (pl Average
that currently
third country
fall under
embassies
the scope
shouldof the
be included
register should
on the rem
list
We
The support a strong
definition andChanged
of interest to include
representation shouldcertaMoreover
not
Some
be made some
organisations,entities,
any more law Good
like
restrictive.
firms law firms,
and are often
Transparency
consultancies, not
in registered
International
particular, haseven
still if theyto
observed
refuse hoars
In light of the original spirit
Changed
of the Transparency
to include certaRegister, Transparency International Average reiterates that the current register should
No opinion All churches and religious Good
communities, political parties, third country govern
No opinion Furthermore, the lobby firms, No opinion
PR firms and law firms employed to lobby the E
Die
The interinstitutionelle
current definition ofVereinbarung
Changed tozwischen dem
include certa TheEuropischen
register applies Parlament
to law Good und der
firms but Europischen
many refuse to register correctly, althoug
Kommission enthlt bereits
Die bisher geltenden VerNo eine sehr weite Definition der Ttigkeiten, die unter
opinion Poor das Register fallen.
Problematisch ist, dass Organisationen bei ihren Registereintrgen offenbar teilweise von einer engeren
Il serait utile aussi d' Changed to include certaDans le but d'obtenir uneGood
Definition ausgehen. Folglich ist eine Vergleichbarkeit der Daten im Register nicht gewhrleistet. Die EU-Institutionen sollten a
This is a complicated
Einklang quePreserved
mit den Leitlinien the same as cOne of the moststehen,
des Transparenzregister-Sekretariats positiveGood
d.h. die bereitgestellten
Die interinstitutionelle No opinion
Informationen nach bestem Wissen vollstndig, aktuell und nicht irrefhrend Poor sind. Das gegenwrtige
Ungleichgewicht mindertNo dieopinion The activities
Vergleichbarkeit, schadet related to
dem politischen ZielAverage
der Transparenz und fhrt zu
einem einseitigen Blaming No opinion
derer, die sich compliant verhalten. Poor
Changed to include certaLe Kommunalbehrden undGood
principe de registre, Kommunalverbnde sind Regionalbehrden und de
Preserved the same as currently
Das Register sollte
Die gewhlten in sich
VolksvertreterPoor
kohrent sein.
in lokalen Es kann nicht willkrlich eine staatli
Behrden/Gebietskrperschaften neh
Changed to include certaWenn ESTA supports
regionale a mandator
VertretungenAverage und Verbnde sowie diplomatische Vertretunge
Mit Blick u. a. auf kommunale Resolutionen, Konsultationsbeitrge, Delegatio
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen
Registers fhren haben
wrde.sich Good
Aus in den europischen Vertrgen
verfassungspolitischen (siehe u. selbst
a. Art. verpflichte
4 und 5
In den Leitlinien zur i Changed to exclude certa sowie der VereinigungenGood und Netze, die zu ihrer Vertretung gegrndet werde
Changed to include certaAll non-State actors shouAverage
Additional guidelines shoChanged to include certaAll organisations engaged Good
See attached written su Changed to include certaSee attached written su Average
Changed to include certaIt should also be record Poor
No opinion Poor
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
ALTER-EU considers that all churches and religious communities, political pa
No opinion Average
This includes informal Changed to include certaIItdo not see
is also why, apart
essential that Poor
Transparency International welcomes the broad definition of lobbying onall thirdthe
which country (i.e. those outside
EU Transparency Register of the EU) governm
is built.
Changed to include
The Register should continue to include all external certaWe see no
Theinfluence. good
EU Transparency reason
As such, third G
t ood
Registercountry
aimsembassies
to make the should
influence
be included
of interest on the
represe
list
The definition of interest Changed to include
representation shouldcertain
not
Where
betypes
Furthermore,
made of any
entities
nationalthe more (plrestrictive.
register
registers No
are opinion
applies to law
missing, thefirms
Transparency but many refuse
EU Transparency
International has toobserved
register
Register corr
shouldhoa
The definition
In light of lobbyin
of the original Changed
spirit to include certa
of the Transparency Register,
All organisations
Transparency No opinion
that currently
International fall under
reiterates
the scope
that theof current
the register
register
shouldshould
rem
Changed to include certaSome organisations, lawAverage firms and consultancies, in particular, still refuse to s
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaDada a definio do pontGood
Changed to include certaThe register should applyGood
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certaToutes les entits cherchGood
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaMonost registracije naj Average
Changed to include certaTroverei opportuna l'applGood
Changed
The Interinstitutional Agreement to include
between thecerta Lobist je
European vsak, ki lahko
Parliament and the Average
European Commission already contains a very wid
Changed to include certaqualunque portatore di i Good
The Joint Transparency Register
ChangedSecretariat
to include certa
staffing
It
Theis should
acitizen
matter therefore
of perceive
will equalitbe increased.
Poor
as legitimateThisanwould helpiftoit deploy
influence effective enforce
is representative of it's
All organisations engaged Changed to include certaThe All EU Transparency
organisations engaged Register
Good aims to make the
However, not every citizen feels like he or she is represented into influence of interest represe
the Europe
Transparency
I'm wishing it isInternational
! welcomes
Changed the broad
to include definition
certaTherefore, of access
lobbying toon which
specific the EU Transparency
Goodinformation is mandatory Register
to allowis said
built.citizens t
Where national registers are missing, the EU Transparency Register should a
Changed to include certaTutti i soggetti che inte Good
The Register should continue to include all external influence. As such, third country embassies should be included on the list
Changed to include certain All types of entities
organisations (plcurrently
that Good fall under the scope of the register should rem
No opinion
The definition of interest representation should not be made any more restrictive. Good Transparency International has observed ho
Preserved the same as currently
Some organisations, lawAverage firms and consultancies, in particular, still refuse to s
In light of the original spirit
Changed
of the Transparency
to include certaRegister, Transparency International Average reiterates that the current register should
Changed to include certaDie Any Registrierung im Lobbyregister
entity representing sAverage sollte ausschlielich davon abhngen, we
Preserved the same as currentlyEs ist noch dazu essentiell, Good dass alle Regierungen von Drittstaaten (also Staa
Changed to include certaA requirement should beAverage i
Die interinstitutionelle No opinion Letztlich gilt das RegisterPoor auch fr Anwaltskanzleien, von denen sich nicht all
Wir sind der Meinung, d Changed to include certa Average
Changed to include certaThe Associazioni
Register religiose,
should include p Good all organisations engaged in any activity conside
More than influence poli Changed to include certa Average
Avec le Conseil des Communes et Rgions Europennes (CCRE-CEMR) et
Changed to include certaAny party that is not ei Poor
The Register should alsoPreserved the same as currently Theoutre,
En specificity
nous of socialque
voyons Good
partners ans social
le registre dialogue activities
est incohrent dans sonshould
approchebe fully
dan
No opinion The same goes for activities Averagewhere the European institutions are demanding
La dfinition doit tre Changed to exclude certa L'Union europenne doitAverage faire tout son possible pour assurer un dialogue ouv
The Register should be based No opinion
on precise definitions EFPIA supports aasreform Average
t is considered lobbying and what is not and what
Thethat are clear
specificity of some to what
organisations, such as BUSINESSEUROPE, our umb
Preserved the same as currently Good
recognised by the European institutions. All activities carried out under
We can't
The control
current the acti
definition doesChanged
not offerto ainclude certaTo
clear exemption me,for
Social every
workorganisation
Dialogue relating Athe
verage
shouldtocontinue defence
to beofexcluded
clients individual rights before
from the scope the Co
of the registe
Preserved the same as currently Good
The same goes for activities where the European institutions are demanding
1. Contacts
UNESPA with officials
believes that theto better
No opinioninform clients if input,
a particular legal or administrative
data, examples Average
etc, step is appropriate
to the organisation concerned, andoradmissible
where they in invite
the e
No opinion them to hearings, meetings, Averageseminars or other events.
2. Advice given to clients to help them ensure their activities comply with the relevant law in collaboration with outside Counsel
AmCham EU would like to Changed to include certaAmCham EU believes that Average
3. Preparation of strategyNo opinion
notes for clients on the potential impact of any legislative Good or regulatory changes with regard to their
The definition should be Changed to include certaAll bodies having activi Average
The definition of
4. Processing anddirect a Changed
sharing to include
of sensitive certa
business Any entity
secrets andcarrying
confidential out adocuments
Good relating to individual procedures
No opinion Good
Die BRAK begrt, dassChanged to include certa
die Interinstitutionelle The same obligations
Vereinbarung (IV) in Art.shou 10Average
eine Ausnahme fr die rechtsberatende Ttigkeit vo
No opinion Good
I rappresentanti dei governi e delle assemblee legislative regionali non dovre
So liegt anwaltliche Ttigkeit vor, wenn
Changed der Anwalt
to include certa fr seinen
ItIntegrity
should be Mandanten
about the w in
Goodeineril contributo
konkreten regionale
Rechtsangelegenheit eine Vorschr
The OECD in its Principles for Transparency andSi osserva, in per converso,
Lobbying che
states that definitions alle politiche
of lobbying europee,
and lobbyists neee
La definizione appare esPreserved the same as c Average
Auch die Vertretung rechtlicher Interessen des Mandanten gegenber den EU-Institutionen im Rahmen der Anwendung beste
Das Kapitel
Overall, "Muss
we take theich
viewmChanged to exclude certa
that the Transparency D
Wieiedetailed
gewhlten
Register
As definition
unter Ziffer Volksvert
in our is,
response
1.1.b Good
content
gezeigt, above
wise, fit
in for
ist eine 1.2purpose,
and 2.1, nevertheless,
Koordination we
derbelieve thatthe
Politiken the
im scope
scopeofo
Mehreben
Changed to include certa sollten unter Good
Jede andere Ttigkeit des Anwalts gegenber den EU-Institutionen, die nicht die Vertretung rechtlicher Interessen sowieverfas
Deshalb Beachtung der demokratischen Legitimation und die A
About "no matter where tChanged to include certaDurch Any kind eineof Ausnahme
entity entit vom Average
Transparenzregister und Einrichtung einer separa
Zurdiesem
In Klarstellung
Sinne knnte
regt die Changed
BRAK an,toausdrcklich
exclude certa EUArt.
in bzw.
10 deren Gremien Average
IV klarzustellen, unddassBehrden
bei Fragen (siehe
zur unter Ziff. 1.1.b).
Auslegung bestehenden Rech
No opinion No opinion
Changed to exclude certa To exclude Regional publi No opinion
No opinion Good
While this statement mayPreserved the same as currently Good
Der RAK begrt, dassChanged in der Interinstitutionelle
to exclude certa ToVereinbarung
exclude Regional (IV) inpubli
Artikel 10 eine klare Ausnahme fr Ttigkeiten im Zusa
No opinion
Bedauerlich ist allerdings, dass diese Ausnahmeregelung
Changed to include certaBASE indessen
dfend nicht ausreichend
Average au klar formuliert ist. In der Praxis wird dies
Le registre faitlesens
principe
s'il sapplique plus grand nombre. Nous proposons d'i
We consider that the defiChanged to include certaFor - Lesthe sake ofdiplomatiques
missions transpareGood
Um dies zu gewhrleisten msste von der Europischen Kommission eine przise Definition festgelegt werden, welche Aktivit
Preserved the same as currently- Les associations religieuses Good
Il
Il nous paraitTtigkeit
Anwaltliche
conviendrait ncessai liegtChanged
de distinguer etwa
avecdannto include
plus vor,
de wenncerta
clart - Les
der
l'activitautorits
Anwaltquifr rgionales
seinen
ressortit Good du
Mandanten
au domaine in einer konkreten
"plaidoyer" Rechtsangelegenheit
qui correspond plus propreme eine
More clarity/guidance is No opinion
Une distinction pourrait mriter d'tre apporte cet gard. Good
Auch
Le die Vertretung
Projet rechtlicher
de recommandation ChangedduInteressen
to include
Comit des
des certa
Mandanten
Transparenz
Ministres
Le aux gegenber
Registre sollte
tats
ne devraitsowoNo
membres den
pasEU-Institutionen
opinion
relatif
pouvoir latre im Rahmen
rglementation
ouvert aux entitsder qui
juridiqueAnwendung
des beste
sontactivits
des drivde
Toutefois, il semble que le Changed
terme "influencer"
to exclude pourrait
certa tre heureusement remplac Average dans le cadre d'une dfinition propre au Re
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
No opinion The specificity of some Average
While the definition see Changed to include certaWWF believes that all entGood
Changed to include certaPeriaatteena tulisi olla, Average
No opinion Good
No opinion Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
ALTER-EU considers that all churches and religious communities, political pa

It is also essential that all third country (ie those outside of the EU) governme

Furthermore, the register applies to law firms but many refuse to register corr
No opinion Registration
More information in thehere: Good Register should depend solely on the nature
Transparency
Preserved the same as currently Good
http://corporateeurope.org/pressreleases/2015/01/european-pr-firms-whitewa
The definition of lobbyin Changed to include certaAll churches and religious communities, political parties, and regional and loc
Average
No opinion Average
It is also essential that lobby firms, PR firms, and law firms employed to lobby
Die interinstitutionelle No opinion Average
No opinion Finally, the register must Good ensure that all law firms correctly register any lobbyi
Geelmuyden Kiese findsChangedt to include certaGeelmuyden Kiese believe Good
Changed to include certaThe Usually one couldStandards
International say thAverage for Lobbying Regulation do make an exception f
The definition of lobbyi Changed to include certa Good
ALTER-EU considers that all churches and religious communities, political pa
Although we fully agree No opinion Many of the entities lis Average
Changed to include certathe It is register shouldthat
also essential applallNo opinion
third country (ie those outside of the EU) governme
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
The definition of lobbyin Changed to include certaFurthermore, it is imperative Average
to find a solution so that law firms which lobby jo
The definition of activit No opinion Good
Changed to include certaVe registracij vseh sub Average
De Vlaamse Regering is van mening dat het toepassingsgebied van het regis
Changed to include certaIf transparency needs to Good
The Register should be eChanged to include certaOutside Net zoalsofde public
Raadadminis Average
van Europa definieert de Vlaamse Regering lobbyen als
Kje je lonica med lobi Changed to include certaDodati vico in vse dra No opinion
No opinion Wanneer lokale overheden Gooden hun respectieve koepelorganisaties als lobbyg
Changed to exclude certa No opinion
Preserved the same as currently Good
No opinion Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
We believe the definitio No opinion Average
Insurance Europe believe No opinion Average
Excluding certain activit No opinion Although
Creemos que la definicin es adecuada pero que en la prctica se ha hecho we express no Good
o desproporcionadamente extensiva a actividades
As, entendemos que noNo pueden
opinion
ser incluidos como actividades de lobby Good el proporcionar informacin a las instituciones como
Under the current scope Changed
o to include certaToAll maintain
citizens, NGOs, businGood
a balanced approach between transparency and efficiency the sy
Man inclusion
The knnte noch
of allergnzen
No opinion
organisations representing anHearings
interest isand
somewhat
other events
To maintain a balanced approach Average
unrealistic.
are anTheexample.
current
between It register
currentlyhas
transparency allows
reached
and individuals
the right
efficiency with
the b
sy
However,
The FEDMA
inclusion of allconsiders
Preserved
crucial
organisations the
for pan
same
representingEuropean
asancHearings
Moreover,
trade
interest a
association
isand balance
somewhat between
toGood
other events beare
registered
transparency
unrealistic.anThe in theand
example.
current ItTR. accountability
As constantly
register
currentlyhas
allows can
reachedactive
be part
reache
individuals
the rightofb
with
However, FEDMA considers Preserved
crucial the
for pan
sameEuropean
as cMoreover,trade a association
balance between
toGood
be registered
transparencyin theand
TR.accountability
As constantlycanactive
be part
reacheof
Activities covered by th Preserved the same as cAs long as the current s Average
Changed to include certareligiose, politiche e dei Average
La dfinition est trop va No opinion All entities that carry out Good lobbying activities should have to register. Registrati
Kommunen, kommunale Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verbnde sowie deren
The definition included i Changed to include certaChurches Dengovernments
Kommunen and religious
und ihrenco
Average
kommunalen Spitzenverbnden
All including those from outside the EU shouldkommt
also beneben Bu
required
Changed to include certain types
Finally, of
Die demokratische entities (pl Good
it should be Legitimation
ensured thatund die firms
all law besondere verfassungsrechtliche
carrying out lobbying activities Ster
Changed to include certaAutoridades Pblicas ReGood
Changed to exclude certa Average
Changed to include certa Good
Changed to exclude certa We propose the exclusion No opinion
Financing should be inc Changed to include certaEverybody should be inclGood
AFA believes that the curNo opinion Good
Le champ dapplication des activits menant linscription au registre doit tre clairement dfini. Ce point est particulirement
Changed to include certaNo entity should be excluGood
Les termes plaidoyer et mise en uvre des politiques sont ambigus dans ce contexte, car ils dsignent galement cet
De plus, le paragraphe 7No de opinion
laccord interinstitutionnel considre mme llaboration Good de lettres, de documents dinformation, d
TheCNB
Le register doesn't
reconnat proles
que Changed to includeont
lignes directrices certa All mentioned
tent de rpondre groups
cesshproccupations,
Average mais elles lont fait sous la forme dun
Pour le CNB, le Projet dePreserved the same
recommandation duas currently
Comit des Ministres aux tats Goodmembres relatif la rglementation juridique de
Changed to include certaEn rgle gnrale, toute Good
No opinion Average
No opinion CSE sees no reason for Average the exclusion of certain entities and thinks all church
Changed to include certa Good
No opinion Average
There is still opportunity for opinion greater clarityFollowing
No bringing the rationale
to the definitions ofAverage
theand
of direct definition provided
indirect influence,in the
as previous
a great rangepoint,ofthere
activis
The Council of Europes Changed
draft definition
to include I
of lobbying
certaThe give you two
isintroduction
perhaps clearerexamples:
of a und
man
andAKommunalverbnde
verage
carries less risk of misinterpretation :Lobbying me
Kommunalbehrden sind Regionalbehrden
(Confindustria) und havede
Changed to include certa1. in Register
Italy, trade unions and the Employers Association b
The
Das Register should
sollte in appl A
sichverage
kohrent sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich eine staatli
2. in UK, the Transparency Register only requires lobbists working in consulta
Changed to include certaAller Wennofregionale
them Vertretungen No opinion
und Verbnde sowie diplomatische Vertretunge
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen
According haben vision
to a pluralist sich
Good inofden europischen
society, all interest Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
groups promote a particu
Die Anforderungen an diNo opinion If you are interested my PhD Averagedissertation is on the concept of Public Interest
Changed to include certaAttached you find a chapter Poorthat I wrote for a volume which is about to be pub
Changed to include certaAlle Einheiten und Orga Average
La Fdration bancaire frNo opinion Good
All entities that conduct any of the activities covered by the current definition
Changed to include certaShould include all, or e Average
Such definition seems unreasonably extensive. We do not believe that sending a position paper by email could be reasonably
Changed to include certaOnly Ein Register
entities sollte
that are in sinvolved
Good in policy making according to the Part Six Instit
Changed to include
It seems to us that such a wide definition would implycertain
CEEP types of entities
a tremendous (pl
believes thatworkloadchangesAverage
for
in the
bothexclusion
the institutions
regimeand should
the be
lobbyists,
implemented.
calling
A proper monitoring of t Changed to include certaTherefore, Regional authorities Good when acting outside their rights and duties as
A
Thisclear
is adefinition of the
complicated scope
Changed
question of
asthe
to activities
goodexclude certa
covered
arguments However,
for abymoretheumbrella
Transparency
limitedorganisations
Good
Register
definition representing
exist. is absolutely
The at necessary.
the European
wide definition of theWe level
believe
registers regional
that t
scope
However, as long as the Changed
register istonot
include
legallycerta
binding,
One of wetheagreemostthatpositiveGood
it is positive to have a wide definition, all activities carried
While DIGITALEUROPE Changed part to include certaDIGITALEUROPE strongly Average
b
No opinion Good
We believe the register Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
La definizione sopraindicata Changed to include
corretta, ma noncerta
Das Register sollte auf Average
esaustiva.
Il lobbismo per la nostra Preserved
organizzazione
the same
non as
si traduce
currentlysolo "nell'influenzare Average
direttamente o indirettamente l'elaborazione o l'a
Il est a noter que si la Changed to include certaIl est essentiel d'largi Average
If we understand it corre Changed to include certaAll entities should be regAverage
Preserved the same as currently Good
The EU institutions shouChanged to include certaUnless there are compelliAverage
The current definition of Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include
The Register cannot cover the whole spectrum ofThe certa At least,
indirect religious
Register
lobbying. commu
is notGroosrats Goodlobbying
comprehensive enough in terms
campaigns, of the
done by entities it includes
non-registered org
In order for this definit Changed to include certa Average
In conclusion, I would say, Changed
the Register
to include
has tocerta
cover
All the onlyorganizations
direct influence or and
Good contacts with EU officials.
Preserved the same as currently Good
Le registre devrait gale Changed to include certaLe registre devrait incl Poor
Changed to include certaThe register should
All organisations applyNo opinion
influencing EU decision-making sign up to the EU Transpare
What about the Council?Changed to include certaDie Registrierung im Lobbyregister Average sollte ausschlielich davon abhngen, we
Je suis inscrite au regi Changed to include certaIl Esest istanachronique,
nochdapplication inju Average
dazu essentiell, dass alle
Le champ du registre estRegierungen
actuellementvon Drittstaaten
satisfaisant (also Staa
lexception
Changed to include certaTo be added: regional puAverage
I have not notice really Changed to include certaLetztlich It
should
The Proposition
update include
gilt das
of n6 Public
theRegister
:present Good
Appliquerauch
IIAaux frEglises
shouldAnwaltskanzleien,
make etclear that von
communauts denen ofsich
religieuses
all levels public nicht
les all
m
gove
Wir sind der Meinung, d Changed to include certaLes Eglises et les communauts Average religieuses ralisent des oprations de lobb
Changed to include certaLes Eglises etofles
Associations communauts
regional Average religieuses non-inscrites
or local governments formed either devraient
including bnficie
private
One of the key reasons th Changed to exclude certa Average
3.1 What is your impres3.1 What is your impre 3.1 What is your impres3.1 What is your impre
Average Good Good Good
Average Average Poor Poor
Average Poor Average Average
Average Average Poor Average
Good Average No opinion Poor
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Average Average
Average Good Average Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion Average
Poor Good Good Average
Average Average No opinion Good
Average Good Average Poor
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Poor Poor Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average Good Good
Good Average No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor Average
Average Average Good Good
Average Good Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Good Average
No opinion Good No opinion Average
Good Good Good Good
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average Average
Good Average Good Average
Average Average Good No opinion
Average Average Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Average Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Average Good No opinion Poor
Poor Poor No opinion Poor
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Poor Poor Average Poor
Average Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Average Good No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Average
Good Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Good Average No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Poor No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Average Average Good Average
Average Average Good Average
Poor Average Poor Average
No opinion Good No opinion Average
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Good Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Average Poor Average Average
Average Good Average Poor
Average Average Average Average
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Good Average Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average Poor
Good Average Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Average Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Good Poor Good
Average Poor Poor Poor
Poor Poor Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Poor Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Poor Poor
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Poor
Average Average Average Average
No opinion Good Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion Average No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Average Average Average Average
Average Average No opinion Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average Good Average
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Average Good Good Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Poor
Good Good Good No opinion
Poor Good Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Good Average No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Good Good Average Average
Good Average No opinion Average
Good Average Poor Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average Average
Good Good Average Average
Poor Poor No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Average Good Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Average Average
Poor Average Average Poor
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Average Average Good No opinion
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Poor Average Average No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Average Average
Average Average Poor Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Good Good Good
Average Average Poor Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Good Poor No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good No opinion
Good Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Good
Good Average Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good Average No opinion
Poor Average Average No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Good No opinion Average
Average Average Poor Poor
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average Poor
Good No opinion No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Good
Good Good Good Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Average Poor
Good Poor Average No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Average Average Average Average
Good Average Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Average No opinion
Poor Good Poor No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion Average
Average Poor Average Average
Average Average Average Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average Poor
Poor Poor No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Average Poor No opinion Poor
Poor Average No opinion Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Average Average Average
Average Average Average Poor
Poor No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Average Poor Poor Average
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average Good No opinion
Poor Poor Average Poor
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average Poor Average
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Average Poor Average
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Good Average No opinion
Average Average Average Poor
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Poor
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Good Average Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Good No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Good Good Average
Good Good Good Good
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average No opinion
Good Poor Poor Poor
Average Poor No opinion Poor
Average Poor Average No opinion
Poor Poor Good No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Good Average No opinion Average
Good Good Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion Good No opinion
No opinion Poor No opinion Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion Good
Good Good Poor Average
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average Average
Good Good Average Average
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Poor Poor Average Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor Average
Good Average Good No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Good
Poor Poor Good No opinion
Poor Poor Average Poor
Poor Average Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion Average
Good Good Good Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Average Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion Poor
Good Good Good Average
No opinion Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion Good
Average Average Average Average
Average Good Average Average
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Poor No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Good Average No opinion Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Average Average
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Good Poor
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Good Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Good Average Average Average
Average Good No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion Poor
Good Good Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion Average Good No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Average Average Poor Poor
Good Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
No opinion No opinion Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion Good
Average Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Poor Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average Average No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good Poor No opinion
Good Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Average Good No opinion
Good Poor Good Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average No opinion Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Average Average
Poor Average Average Poor
Average Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Good Good Good Good
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average No opinion Average
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Good
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Poor Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor Poor
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Good Poor Average No opinion
Good Average Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Poor Average Average Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Poor Poor Poor
Poor Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Good
Average Poor No opinion Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Average Poor Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Average Average Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Average Good Good
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Average Good No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Poor Average No opinion Poor
Average No opinion No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Good Good Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Good Average Good Average
Good Average Good Average
Good Average Good Average
Average No opinion No opinion Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Poor Average Poor Average
Average Average Average No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good Good No opinion
Poor Average Good Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Poor Average No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion Poor No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Poor Poor Good No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Average Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Poor Poor Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Average Average Good Average
Average Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Average
Poor Good Average No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Average
Good Good Good Good
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Poor No opinion No opinion Good
Average Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Average
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion Good
Average Poor Good Good
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Poor Average No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor No opinion No opinion Average
Poor Average Poor Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Average Poor No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good Poor No opinion
Good Average Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion Average Average Poor
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average Good
Average Poor Average No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Good Good Average Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Poor No opinion
Average Average Poor No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Poor No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Average No opinion Good
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Poor Poor
Poor Average Poor Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Average Average Average
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
No opinion Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
No opinion Average No opinion Good
Poor Poor Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Poor
Average Average Good No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor Average Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Poor No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion Average
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Good Good Good
No opinion Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Good
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Good Good Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Average Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Average Average
Poor Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Good Average Average Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average Average
Average Poor Good Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Poor No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Poor Poor Poor
Average Poor Average Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion Poor
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Poor Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
Good Average Average Average
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Average Good No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Good Average Average
Poor No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Good Average Average Poor
Good Good Good Good
Good Average Poor No opinion
Good Average Poor Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Poor Average Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Good Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Average Average Poor Poor
Good Good Good Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Poor Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Good Average
Good Average Good Average
Average Average Good Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Average Good Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Average Average Good Good
Poor Average Poor No opinion
Average Good Good Good
Good Good Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Good
Good Average Average Average
Poor No opinion Average No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Poor
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Good Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average Average Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Poor No opinion Average
Good Average Good No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion Poor
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good Average
Good Average No opinion Good
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Average Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Poor Average Average No opinion
Average Poor No opinion Poor
Good Average Average Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average Good
Good Good Good Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Average No opinion Poor
No opinion Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Good No opinion Poor
Poor Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Good Good Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Good Average Average
Good Good Good Average
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion Average
Poor Poor Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Average
No opinion Good No opinion Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Poor
No opinion Good No opinion Average
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Average Good Average Average
Average Good Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Good Average Average
Poor Poor Average No opinion
Average Good Average Average
Average Good Average Average
Average Good Average Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Poor Average Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Poor Poor
Good Good Poor Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Average Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Average Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Average Average Average Average
Poor Average Average No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Average Good Average Good
Good Good Average No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Average Average Poor No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Average Good Good Good
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Average Good No opinion Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good Good Good
Good Average Poor Average
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good Average Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Average Poor Poor Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Good Average No opinion
Average Poor Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Average Good Poor No opinion
No opinion Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Average Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor Average No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Good
Average Good No opinion Good
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Poor Average Average
Average Good Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average Good
Average Average No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Poor Poor Poor Average
Average Good Good No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Average Average No opinion Average
Poor Average No opinion Poor
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Good Average Good Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good Good Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average Good
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Poor Average Poor
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average Poor Average
Average Average Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Poor
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Average Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Poor Good Good Good
Good Good Average Good
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average Good
No opinion Good No opinion Average
Average Good No opinion Good
Good No opinion Average No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Poor Average Good Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Poor Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Average Poor Good
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Average Good Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Good No opinion Average
Average Average Poor Poor
Good Good Good Average
Average Average No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Average Good No opinion Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Good No opinion Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average Average Average
Average Good Average Good
Good Good No opinion Poor
Average Good No opinion Good
Poor Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Good Average Average
Average Good Average Average
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Good
Average Average No opinion Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Good
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Average
Average No opinion No opinion Average
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Good
Average Good No opinion Good
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Average No opinion Good
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Poor Average Average No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion Average
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Good Average Average
Poor Average Poor Average
Comments or suggestions Final(Optional)
comments or ideas Do you want to proceed1.1 The Register invite
No
Yes No
No
Yes No opinion
Yes No
No
No
Se podra hacer ms atraAdjunto un documento so Yes No opinion
No
Yes No
Yes Yes
No
I would add a "how to naSeriously ... no one shouNo
No
No
Yes No opinion
No
No
Yes No
No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes No opinion
Yes No
Yes No opinion
Links to sponsored projects or parties would be vNo
No
Yes No opinion
No
No
No
No
Public bodies like the EUNo
No
Yes No
Money is important. Big No
Yes Yes
No
In my comment to 1.1 b) I made a reference to the ongoing TTIP negotiations and the precautionary p
Zur Vollstndigkeit der Informationen: FinanzquelYes No
The language the entity The Registry, to be effic No
Many consumer groups are rightly concerned that the TTIP negotiations may produce regulations tha
L'Europe peut vivre san No
Viewed in this light (whichYes
is not to acknowledge that
No there aren't other perspectives), I think TTIP neg
No
No
No
Die Einfachheit der Suchfunktionen sollte erhalteYes No
Adapter les documents et fonctions tous suppoNo
No
Yes No
No
The EU should implement Yes No
No
No
La communication et la pdagogie vis vis des citoyens europens reste a amliorer parce qu'inexist
No
No
Yes No
when representant registyou should watch this vi Yes No
Yes
Strong measures (prevention & sanctions) must be Notaken to ensure the "ethical" part of the definition g
The best solution in my opinion
No would be to find alternatives to lobbying. Such as public discussions /
Yes No
No
das kann ich im Moment nicht beurteilen, das wirNo
Yes No opinion
Plus ergonomique. Par ailleurs, ce serait No
Plus ergonomique. Par ailleurs, ce serait No
Yes Yes
Il manque une sorte de tBonne initiative a rendreNo
the parliaments and governments of EU Member states have to be forced to adopt a lobbying register
No
Companies have to be enforced to give better information about their activities.
We don't know wich enterIt's a great ide ton cons Yes have to be in place.No opinion
If they fail to do so, penalties
The register has to be mandatory
Yes for everyone. No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes Yes
No
No
The lack of meaningful open data offered by the tYes No
Yes No
No
Yes No
I thnik the lobbies shou No
' No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes No opinion
il est trs important de Yes No
Yes No
No
No
No
Yes No
Por favor, el TTIP influ No
Yes No
Una volta ottenuta la regiYes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
A maps (like webgis) of all the organization will Yes No
No
Those lobbyists willing t Yes No
Yes No
Lorsque pour une Directiv Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
No
with an approaching UK No
No
Yes No
No
No
Yes No
Debe haber un apartadoYes p No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes Yes
Yes No
J'UTILISE TRES PEU CA FAIT DES ANNEES No
Tous les registres du moNo
No
Yes No
dans le cadre actuel de sDvelopper des centres Y des No opinion
all entries have to be presented in latin language Yes No
No
Il serait bien de pouvoir avoir le registre en catalan.
Il serait bien que le registre
Yesne serve pas qu'au parlement
Yes et la commission europenne mais aussi
Thema Menschrechte kn Yes Yes
Just had a look for the If the media don't watch No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
No
Yes No
No
No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No opinion
Yes No
Yes No
No
No
Yes No
Tutte le pagine del sito dovrebbero essere scritteNo
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Transparenz von allen SNo
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
possibility to register in the register if you are No
No
Yes Yes
Yes No
Some field are not mandatory. There fore the infoNo
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No opinion
No
Yes No
Yes No
da manche Angaben offen Register sollte auf jed Yes No
Yes Yes
Technically, the register Explain why some interesNo
Register should allow Search on policy domains an No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes Yes
Yes No
No
No
Yes No
Cannot search specific pieces of legislation and No
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes Yes
Yes No
Yes No
El principal problema de No
Yes No
Yes No
The website has some good Priorpoints in it allowslobbyists/interest
to Registration acc
No representatives should meet minimum professional qualification
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
No
No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Erweiterte Suchfunktion anbieten, z.B. fr Such No
No
No
Yes No
The problem in Portugal Yes i No
Yes No
Yes Yes
As I said above, this re Yes No
No
No
Opdel ift. registrering og sgning Yes No opinion
Yes Yes
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes Yes
The following solutions were No identified:
1. Implement strengthened incentives for registrants
Yes No
2. Allocate more resources to the Joint Transparency Register Secretariat
No
3. Run quality checks of the data introduced by registrants more often and also before publishing it
Une certaine modernisation 4. serait la bienvenue.
Introduce Yes
de-facto sanctions for misbehavingNo
5. Harmonise the Register with Member StatesNo
Yes
Yes No opinion
Yes No
No
La transparence doit se No
Yes No
Have not visited the website. Only this survey. No
No
Yes No opinion
No
Yes No
No
Yes No opinion
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
A certain level of minim No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes Yes
No
Yes No
No
Once there is a genuine Ndo
Carte Professionnelle + Sans Carte Professionnel No
Yes No opinion
Yes No
Yes Yes
No
No
Il a dj le mrite d'exist Une consultation publiquNo
Yes No
No
No
No
Yes No
No
Looks as this IS just a Register must show conta No
Yes No
Donnes incompltes Yes Yes
No
No
No
No
You should really hire some good web developersNo f
Yes No opinion
Yes No
ordinary citizens do not No
No
No
No
very messy design and colouring No
Yes No
No
Declaraao de presena,No
Yes No
I am a private individua No
Yes No opinion
Start to make a better jo Yes Yes
No
Yes No opinion
No
No
No
Es erscheint im uersten NoMae unlogisch und nicht zielfhrend, wenn staatliche Intstitutionen der NU
Wenn die EU den MultilevelNo Governance Dialog ernst meint, muss sie auch akzeptieren, dass die Kom
No
No
There should be a directo
Thank you for asking peoYes No opinion
Yes No opinion
No
Yes No
No
Stop allowing Commission Yes No opinion
The Register must remain Yes No
No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Le registre ne permet pas de savoir qui a fait qu No
Yes No
No
No
No
Yes No
No
Advertise proposed changes as a result of lobbyiNo
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes No opinion
Good to see the 'Lobby-is No
No
I don't know who is lobbying, I want to see who hNo
No
Yes No opinion
You are making up as a mo Europeans are not Americ No
No
No
No
No
The page is a bit overburdened, especially the s No
oldschool design. No
Yes No opinion
The EU website is somethi As I mentioned, transparNo
No
Yes No
No
For a site like this a mobile version is less import No
No
Yes No opinion
No
uneingeschrnkte TranspYes No
No
This design is frequently used by organisations. No
No
No
No
No
No
While transparency and a No
Do as startups do and aaDumb it down, include alNo
No
No
It looks like it was crea I love the EU and want t No
I did not know the website before - why? Yes No
No
Adequate but the designConsultations are good. No
allow these boxes were writing in to resize as wri No
Yes Yes
No
No
No
No
The option to search and sort by lobbying party No
No
No
No
It's clear who is lobbying but its not clear how t No
No
No
The layout is not ideal for a phone, a better lay No
No
Laat het beter weten dat No
No
Language: Even the non-standardized parts of anNo entry should be accessible in as many languages as possible - at the very le
No
For high-stakes entries (e.g. those where annual No costs related to activities covered by the register exceed 1.000.000 or othe
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Seems like the powers thThis should not pass un No
No
which politician did they talk to? what interests d No
Mahdollisuus koko rekisterin tai osan siit lataa No
As a web designer I found problems with the site,No namely it's out of date regarding modern standards of basic usability, and it's
No
No
The website needs to be more user-friendly to le No
No
I think that the search function could be much m No
No
design is poor and not Again this survey seemsYes No
No
No
No
No
No
Website voor de leek ov U merkt, ik ben wat cynisNo
No
No
Eine alphabetisch geordnete Liste aller registrie No
No
No
Your website looks over 5 years old and appears No a
You should at least be able to search interaction No
No
No
No
Yes No
No
No
It would be helpful if th No
No
No
Poor.website
The What isisneeded is a but
functional, live-stream.
not clear People
in what noYes
kinds of information can beNo opinion
found and where. The appearance is cluttered, bloc
As an example, it would be helpful if users using the Yessearch function wereNo given
opinion
example keywords or categories so that they
Yes No opinion
No
Yes No
No
No
No
I am a firm supporter of No
Haven't compared extensively enough regarding No the
Yes No
No
No
No
No
Tem que se alargar o regYes No
No
No
No
No
Yes No
Sera interesante difere Yes Yes
No
No
No
Categories / "genres" for searching. Example " No
On a desktop computer it works perfectly. The mobile No websites has some very light css bugs on my phone on the first page wh
No
I would mainly recommand Companies
extendingorthe
institution
pages of Noeach lobbyists groups to include what are the main points they argued upo
I would command the EUNo fo
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Die bei der Suche angezLobbyarbeit soll in erst No
Yes No
No
No
No
It should be possible to Yes Yes
Yes No
User-friendliness of the website improved significYes No
Il est frquent que les c No
Yes No
No
No toda la informacin se encuentra traducida enYes No
In the interest of transparency, websites such as No
No
No
No
Yes No opinion
No
It is important you hear itItfrom
is important
my pointyou
of view
hearand
it from
thatmy
is of
point
a Peruvian
of view and
Citizen
thatwho
is ofloves
a Peruvian
his country
Citizen
deeply
who loves
and ishis
extremely
country

I am no magician nor a fortune


I am noteller
magician
but I can
nor already
a fortunetell
teller
thatbut
your
I can
findings
already
on tell
thisthat
process
your will
findings
comeon
tothis
showprocess
that the
willprocess
come

I can already tell by the articles


I can already
the JNE
tellare
by putting
the articles
out but
thethe
JNEmost
are grieving
putting out
feeling
but the
is that
mostthis
grieving
will come
feeling
to light
is that
toothis
latewill
andcow

BUT I will talk on behalf ofBUT theI people


will talkwho
on behalf
are showing
of the people
their outrage
who are due
showing
to this decision.
their outrageTheduefact to
is this
that decision.
throughoutThe this
fact
LEGA
is t
No
And that is the very thingAnd is inthat
question
is the NOW
very thing
andNo Iisthink
in question
you shouldNOW take
andunder
I thinkgreat
you consideration
should take under the following:
great consideration th
WHY did they (JNE) act the WHY way
didthey
theydid,
(JNE)
I amact sure
the
No thewayactions
they did,thatI am
put sure
TODOSthe actions
POR EL that
PERU
put TODOS
out of campaign
POR EL were
PERU long
outb
WHY did it happen at that WHY specific
Since did itmoment,
2013, happen at
please
I have becom that
Nospecific
take a look
moment,
at theplease
polls historical
take a lookdata at for
thethe
polls
lasthistorical
90 days data
and youll
for theseelastth9
No
Please also focus on thePlease
WHO, also who focus
actually
onshared
the WHO, lightwho
on the
actually
error shared
made by light
theonpolitical
the error
party
madewhichby greatly
the political
benefit
party
the whic
othe
I'll check if it would be No
But most Importantly please But most
question
Importantly
the WHYplease NoJNE
this question
officialthe
didWHY
not show
this JNE
moreofficial
leniencydid towards
not showthe more
democratic
leniency process
towards by th
And that for some reasonAnd thethat
JNEfor judgments
some reason Yes
is morethe forgiven
JNE judgments No she
and I amissure
more forgiven
will beandallow
I amto continue.
sure she will be allow to cont
I pray you can read this message
I pray youand cancan
readnotice
this message
No
how for me andand canthose
notice
whohowI share
for methe and
samethoseconcern
who I share
there is
theclearly
sameaconcern
case f
No
la transparence ET l'INF No
I recently registered, an No
No
No
No
zoekfunctie op naam kan ik niet vinden binnen 5 No
Yes No
Yes No
Ik heb geen idee waaropIk had eerder nooit geh No
The inclusion of the Council in the Transparency Register is a necessity for genuine democratic and a
No
The Transparency Registe The Transparency Register Yesis an important element No in making the EU decision making process more
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Vertreter sollten auf A No
I got 500-internal server error on using it. No
Being made aware of consultations No and roadmaps and being able to comment on them makes our org
Yes No
No
bisogna dare la possibilit di scaricare i dati con fiYes No
No
Yes No
No
It is straightforward to A Transparency RegisterNo i
L'utilisation des trois l Yes No
Sorry, but its not user friendly Yes Yes
No
Yes No
Yes No
No
No
No
ik heb nog geen registerstricte voorwaarden hoe No
Yes No
No
Yes Yes
Yes No
Yes No opinion
No
No
Good first step, I love No
the website looks like it was made in the year 20 No
No
Yes No
There should be a link with a list of consultatio No
No
Yes No
Yes No
No
No
No
No
No
Man muss allerdings wi Die Einflussnahme diverNo
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
No
Yes No
Die bisherige Unterteil Die Rolle der KommunenNo
see comments at top 2. From our own experienceNo
No
No
I don't care about your whttp://mouseion.weebly. No
No
Man sollte auch sehen k Zivilgesellschaft, Brg No
There are entries that d This is long over due re No
Yes No
It should be possible to Will such a register makeYes Yes
Yes No
In my opinion registrati Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes Yes
No
Yes No
No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Quite outdated design. It's clear though...but no No
Est-ce que les entreprises rpondent elles-mmes Noa
Yes No
Yes No
Provide overviews for types of organizations. Fo No
Mobile app in the future? No
No
Many years ago our athen No
No
No
No
Do what you want. We're No
Die bisherige Unterteilu Die kommunalen Gebietsk No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes No
No
No
No
Information on the exist Yes No
No
I haven't looked at it en etre
Transparancy
efficace !! is good,donne
l'union weYes son impression de toujours
No opinion
avancer embourbe jusqu'au cou.
In addition to the above comments,
No including about the need for the introduction of a legally-binding lo
Yes No
Effective data monitoring: The quality of the data in the lobby register is extremely poor and Transpare
No
In
Enaddition
ocasionesto the
no seabove comments, including about
trataYes Nothe need for the introduction of a legally-binding lo
Improved sanctions to boost data quality and registrations: Submitting inaccurate and / or misleading
No
Effective data monitoring: The quality of the data in the lobby register is extremely poor and Transpare
Meetings with registeredNo lobbyists: The Commission's lobby meeting policy should be immediately ext
No
Improved sanctions to boost data quality and registrations: Submitting inaccurate and / or misleading
Include the European Council, No Council and permanent representations: The European Council and C
il serait bon de connatreMeetings
l'objet duwith
lobbying. La cYes
registered No lobby meeting policy should be immediately ext
lobbyists: The Commission's
Changes to the lobby transparency register disclosure requirements: A series of detailed changes are
Auch die konkreten ZieleFinancial
der Lobbyisten bezogen
disclosure: No turnover should be disclosed to the nearest 10,000 euros and not accordi
Lobby
Include the European Council, Council and permanent
and lawrepresentations:
firms should be The European
to list,Council
Nolobby andthe
C
Lobby issue disclosure: All consultancies required alongside
Lobbyists' names disclosure: No All individuals lobbying on behalf of a registrant should be listed
Besides categories (I to Changes
Disclosuretoofthe lobby transparency
Yes third register
parties: disclosure
No requirements: A series
all thirdofparty
detailed changes are
lobbying through Registrants should specify organisations wh
Financial disclosure: Lobby turnover should be disclosed to the nearest 10,000 euros and not acc
Registering
should be mNo
Lobby issue disclosure: All lobby consultancies and law firms should be required to list, alongside
Yes
Lobbyists' names disclosure: No
All individuals lobbying on behalf of a registrant should be listed
Disclosure of lobbying Nothrough third parties: Registrants should specify all third party organisation
Yes No
In addition to the existi Yes Yes
Yes No
No
No
Yes No opinion
Die bisherige Unterteilu Eine Eintragungspflicht No
Die bisherige Unterteilu Eine Eintragungspflicht No
Yes No
No
Now we see that it's mere See above, records of evYes No
Yes No
There is far too much acNo
Effective data monitoring: The quality of the data in the lobby register is extremely poor and Transpare
Yes No
No
Improved sanctions to boost data quality and registrations: Submitting inaccurate and / or misleading
No
Meetings with registeredYes lobbyists: The Commission's No lobby meeting policy should be immediately ext
No
Include the European Council,
No of Council and permanent representations: The European Council and C
The lack of detailed information, and the vague nature the information supplied is insufficient for true transparency. Greater
Yes No
Changes to the lobby transparency register disclosure requirements:
Accessibility could be improved
On a general
by arranging
point, call
the No
symbol buttons on
Aufbau und Struktur des Transparenzregister-Portals sollten dringend verbessert each individual lobbyist's
werden, um page along the left hand
Fehlinterpretationen und side an
reputat
Financial disclosure: Lobby Yesturnover should be disclosed
No to the nearest 10,000 euros and not accordi
Das Transparenzregister-Portal sollte einen eindeutigen No Hinweis enthalten, dass geschtzte Kosten fr EU- Interessenvertretu
It is true to say that the register
Lobby issue
websitedisclosure:
was improved
All
Yeslobby
in the
consultancies
relaunch of and
April
Nolaw2015.
firmsHowever
should be
we required
wish to make
to list,these
alongside
commen
the
Never found the register No
- The search function shouldNo lobbyist
be improved
shouldandbe sensitised.
able
Yesto represent
For example,
an unregistered
a No
search client
for exxon
and declarations
only pulls up
oftwo
clients
lobbyshould
firmslink
whicd
- Participation in EU structures and platforms should be via a direct link to the Commissions expert groups database, so that
Yes No
- A list of 100 most recentLobbyists'
registrants
names
woulddisclosure:
be useful. All
Theindividuals
present list
lobbying
is too short.
on behalf of a registrant should be listed.
No
- The news listing is not prominent enough and is too far down the home page. All 'news' postings should be notified to those r
- Currently data on the Commissions
Disclosure of lobby
lobbying No is third
meetings
through provided
parties:
onlyRegistrants
via numerousshould
htmlspecify
pages.all
This
third
data
party
should
organisations
also be prov
wh
- We also propose that the technical team for the No lobby register should be open for practical suggestions by outside users.
There should be compulsory Yes twice-a-year updates Noto the lobby register including financial information,
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes Yes
Yes No
Die bisherige Unterteil No
No
Yes No
Yes No
La mention "Cabinets deModifier les lois en fon No
No
Yes No
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
I have attached a PDF do No
No
I am not sure to what extThe EU institutions sho No
les
Et dans
citoyens
toutNoa? Quel est leur poids face ces lobbys? Pourquoi ces "consultants" qui d
Le registre a le mrite Pourquoi la partie B est elle No rserve aux lobbystes ? Comment peut-on esprer plus de transparenc
bersetzungen sind teil Transparenz ist extrem wNo
Es ist schon peinlich, Einfachste Antwort. Ve Yes Yes
lo consulterei volentieri se avesse le caratteristi No
Yes No
No
No
Since 2006 as pioneer en No
No
Transparent ist nicht tei No
Viele Eintragungen sind fehlerhaft bis unsinnig. No
Very helpful would be a reverse database - wh No
Yes No opinion
If EU can be seen to be No
No
No
Didn't know about its existence. No
The website should also have a section for "knowNo
No
No
Could be much more user It's good to develop eth Yes No
No
No
No
Allerdings ist die Unterteilung des Registers n No
Yes No
No
Further important changes Yes are required, such as Noimproved monitoring of the data entries, to stop in
No
No
Britain will be better off leaving the EU and that i No
No
o registry poujem prv Som aktivista, ale nepo Yes No opinion
No
No
No
No
A word cloud with key search terms can help visitNo
Das Transparenzregister sollte rechtlich verbindlich ausgestaltet werden, da nur so eine vertraunesw
Die Verhaltensregeln zurNo Kontaktaufnahme mit Lobbyisten sollte auf die Vertreter/innen des Europis
Visitors of the website s Lobby rules should appl No
No
In addition to the above comments,No including about the need for the introduction of a legally-binding lo
Further important changes beyond the legally binding lobby register are required:
NA I did not look at it 1. Improved monitoring ofNo data entry.ofLobbyists frequently
Effective
Jobs givendata monitoring:
to MEP by bigNo The quality the data in the lobbyenter
registerinaccurate or even
is extremely poorfrivolous data.
and Transpare
2. Improved sanctions to punish inaccurate or misleading information, such as through suspension f
3. All EUsanctions
decision-makers No
Improved to boostmust data be banned
quality and from meeting with
registrations: unregistered
Submitting lobbyists
inaccurate and/or and must oblige
misleading in
Visitors of the website s 4. All lobby rules must also No apply to the European Council, the Council of Ministers and Permanent
Meetings with registeredNo lobbyists: The Commission's lobby meeting policy should be immediately ext
No
Further important changes beyond the legally binding lobby register are required:
Include the European Council, YesdataCouncil and permanent representations: The European Council and C
No frequently
Improved monitoring of the entries, as lobbyists enter inaccurate or even frivolous data
Improved sanctions to punish No inaccurate or misleading information, such as through suspension from
Changes to the lobby transparency No become register disclosure requirements: A series of detailed changes are
The website has seen many All EUimprovements
decision-makers and has
should be banned
more user-friendly
from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige
Visitors of the website should
Lobbyberulesableshould
to viewapply
andNo order
also tothethefull
European
list of registered
Council,lobbyists
the Council according
of Ministers
to different
and Permanent
categories, Repr
suc
Financial disclosure:
Further important Lobby turnover
changes beyond the should be binding
legally disclosed to the
lobby nearest
register are10,000
required:euros and not
according No
Improvedtomonitoring
the present ofsystem
the data ofentries,
wide brackets. Lobby
as lobbyists spendingenter
frequently should be disclosed
inaccurate or evento the nearesd
frivolous
websiteunder
The details has seen
eachmany
Lobby
improvements
registrant issue
Improved should disclosure:
be and
sanctions No
has
available
to Allbecome
lobby
punishin all consultancies
more oruser-friendly.
inaccurate
languages; for and law firms
misleading
an English should finding
information,
speaker, be required
such asthat atoGerman
through list, alongside
suspension
company th
fro
The website has seenmany Lobbyists'
All EU
improvements
decision-makers andNo
names disclosure: has
shouldAll be
individuals
become banned lobbying
more user-friendly, on behalf
from meeting but ofneeds
withstill a registrant
unregistered ofshould
a lotlobbyists be
andlisted.
improvement. should obli
Visitors of the
Visitors website
of the should
website should
Disclosure
bebe
Lobby able oftoshould
rules
able lobbying
view and
to view through
No
apply
and order
alsothe
order thirdfull
tothe
theparties:
list
full of registered
European
list ofRegistrantslobbyists
registered
Council, should
lobbyists according
specify
the Council of all
according to
third
different
Ministers party
andorganisations
to differentcategories,
Permanent
categories,suc
Rew
s
No
Improved sanctions to puNo
Yes No
It needs to document ALAll data entered must beNo
Ich finde, vor allem soll Ich hatte groe SchwieriYes No
The
Further quality of the data changes
important in the lobby register
beyond the is extremely
legally binding poor (Transparency
lobby International
register estimates th
are required:
- Improved monitoring of the dataentries, as lobbyists frequently enter inaccurate
-Lobby rules should
Improved apply also
sanctions to topunish
the European inaccurateCouncil,or the Council of Ministers
misleading and Permanent
information, such Repr
as
suspension fromthe registry and frommeeting with politicians
Lobby
- All EUturnover and spending
decision-makers should be
should be disclosed
banned to the nearest with
frommeeting 10,000 euros.
unregistered lobbyists and
should oblige them to publish online lists of all meetingsheld with lobbyists (existing
-There
Lobbyshould shouldYesapply
rulesbe disclosure of lobby issues
also toandthe ofNolobbyists
Europeannames, including
Council, the third party of
Council lobbying.
Ministers
The search function shouPermanent Representations No in Brussels, and not only the European Parliament and
Commission Yes No
Further important changes No beyond the legally binding lobby register are required:
No
The website has seenFurthermany
Improvedimportant
improvements changes
monitoring andof
No
beyond
has
the data
become the legally
entries, binding
lobbyistslobby
moreasuser-friendly register
frequently are inaccurate
enter required: or even frivolous d
1) Improved monitoring of the data entries, as lobbyists frequently enter inaccurate or even frivolous d
No inaccurate or misleading information, such as through suspension from
Visitors of the websiteImproved
should
Improvedbesanctions
able
sanctions to punish
to view toand
punish
orderinaccurate
the full listorofmisleading
registered information,
lobbyists according
such astothrough
differentsuspension
categories,fros
2) All EU decision-makers No should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should obli
It should have a powerful3)filter Lobby
All EU
Further
rules should
anddecision-makers
search
important
apply
function Noshould
changes inalso
order to
beyondbetothe European
banned
quickly
the legallyassess Council,
frombinding
meeting the
involvementwithCouncil
lobby
of Ministers
unregistered
of a group
register of andand
lobbyists
interest
are required:
Permanent
in EUshould Re
policyobli
it is a shame i cannot u No
Improved monitoring of the data entries, as lobbyists frequently enter inaccurate or even frivolous d
Currently lobbies can only describe
Lobby
Improved rules
themselves.
should apply
sanctions No
toHowever,
also inaccurate
punish toI think
the European
thisorismisleading
misleading.
Council,information,
the
It would
Council
besuch
of
good
Ministers
to through
as alsoand
indicate
Permanent
whether
suspension Re
froa
Verdicts from law cases should All EU also be seen on the
decision-makers Noshould
lobby page.
be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should obli
Lobby rules should apply No also to the European Council, the Council of Ministers and Permanent Re
Further important changes beyond the legally binding lobby register are required:
Visitors of the website s No
Improved monitoring of the data entries, as lobbyists frequently enter inaccurate or even frivolous data
Improved sanctions to punish Yes inaccurate or misleading No information, such as through suspension from
Yes
Further important changes beyond the legally binding No lobby register are required:
Improved monitoring of the No data entries, as lobbyists frequently enter inaccurate or even frivolous data
Visitors of the website s Improved sanctions to punish No inaccurate or misleading information, such as through suspension from
The register
Take is a pointle
the example of ShellA register
Companies, doesI not stopsee
do not Noa single report of an actual lobbying activity: post, calls, emails, meetings,
To write "Shell staff regularly engaged in interest representation
Yes activities towards
No opinion the EU Institutions" with no further detail, is
Yes No
No
Much more can and must be done to boost transparency No
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date infor
No
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige them to publish online
Trilogue talks, by which 90% of EU law is decided Yes in fast-track mode behind No opinion closed doors, must be made to the exception
Membership of expert and Theadvisory
existinggroups No
lobby register
of the Commission
is highly flawed mustand have thisfullconsultation
transparency mustto prevent
lead to serious
privilegedchanges
access and
Open data must be implemented A lobby register
to ensureshould
thatYes
EU
no longer
documents be voluntary
and No
information
but mandatory
are published
and legally
onlinefinding.
and made
It should
easily
require
availaa
Further important changes beyond the legally binding lobby register are required:
No
Improved monitoring of the data entries, as lobbyists frequently enter inaccurate or even frivolous data
Improved sanctions to punish Yes inaccurate or misleading No information, such as through suspension from
The website has seen many All EUimprovements
decision-makers and hasNo become
should be banned
more user-friendly
from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige
Visitors of the website shouldLobbyberules ableshould
to viewapply
andNo order
also tothethefullEuropean
list of registered
Council,lobbyists
the Councilaccording
of Ministers
to different
and Permanent
categories, Repr
suc
No
Visitors of the website s Lobby rules should appl No
Eine Publikmachung derYes Einflunahme in jeder Form No ist wnschenswert, sollte aber nur eine Zwische
No
echt gemeinntzige Lobby No
Yes No
Further important changes beyond the legally binding lobby register are required:
the EU needs cleaning ou
Y es
Improved monitoring of the data entries, as lobbyists No frequently enter inaccurate or even frivolous data
die Namen der Organisationen Improved sindsanctions
alleine wenig No inaccurate or misleading information, such as through suspension from
to punish
The website has seen many All EUimprovements
decision-makers and hasYesbecome
should be banned
more user-friendly No
from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige
Visitors of the website shouldLobbyberules ableshould
to viewapply
andNo order
also tothethefullEuropean
list of registered
Council,lobbyists
the Councilaccording
of Ministers
to different
and Permanent
categories, Repr
suc
Further important changes beyond the legally binding lobby register are required:
Visitors of the website shouldImprovedbe able
Improved sanctions
to viewtoand
monitoring Yes
punish
oforder inaccurate
the datathe entries,
full listorofas No
misleading
registered opinion
lobbyists information,
lobbyists
frequentlyaccording
suchinaccurate
enter astothrough
different
orsuspension
categories,
even from
frivoloussucd
Lobby rules should
Improved sanctionsapply
toNo also to inaccurate
punish the European Council, the
or misleading Council of such
information, Ministers and Permanent
as through suspension Repr
fro
The website has seen many All EUimprovements
decision-makers andNo has
shouldbecome
be bannedmore user-friendly
from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should obli
Visitors of the website shouldLobbyberulesableshould
to viewapply
and
No order
also tothe thefull
European
list of registered
Council,lobbyists
the Council
according
of Ministers
to different
and Permanent
categories, Res
No
The website has seen mLobby rules should appl No
Was soll dieser ganze Nonsens hinsichtlich der F No
All members of EU
Improved monitoring of the counci No data entries and indication made of this, as there is no way of knowing the
Lobby rules should applyNo also to the European Council, the Council of Ministers and Permanent Repr
No
Further important changes beyond the legally binding lobby register are required:
Visitors of the website s Improved monitoring of thNo
Improved monitoring of the data entries, as lobbyists frequently enter inaccurate or even frivolous data
Improved sanctions to punish No inaccurate or misleading information, such as through suspension from
Visitors of the website should be able to view andNo
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige
Lobby rules should applyNo also to the European Council, the Council of Ministers and Permanent.
Visitors of the website s Representations in Brussels, No and not only the European Parliament and Commission.
Yes No
No
No
Bei Beratern, Anwlten eNo
Further important changes beyond the legally binding lobby register are required:
Yes No
Improved monitoring of the data entries, as lobbyists frequently enter inaccurate or even frivolous d
Improved sanctions toYes punish inaccurate or misleading No information, such as through suspension fro
ichThe
kannte es bisher noch
website has seen many nicht-
All EU also ueber
improvements die
decision-makers n No
and has should
become
be banned
more user-friendly
from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should obli
Visitors of the website should Lobbyberulesableshould
to viewapply Yesorder
and also tothe
thefull
European No
list of registered
Council,lobbyists
the Council
according
of Ministers
to different
and Permanent
categories, Res
No
Yes No opinion
No
No
Further important changes Yesbeyond the legally binding No lobby register are required:
Improved
Further important monitoringchangesof thebeyond
data entries, as lobbyists
the legally binding frequently
lobby register enter
areinaccurate
required: or even frivolous da
Lobby
Improved Regeln solltento
sanctions aupunish
No inaccurate or misleading information, such as through suspension from
- Improved monitoring of the data entries, as lobbyists frequently enter inaccurate or even frivolous da
The website has seen many Data
-All EUentered
improvements
Improved by lobbyistNo
decision-makers
sanctions and has
should
to punish become
be banned
more or
inaccurate user-friendly
from meetinginformation,
misleading with unregistered
such aslobbyists
throughand should oblig
suspension from
Visitors of the website should
-Lobby
All EU berules
ableshould
to viewapply
decision-makers and No order
also tothe
should bethefull
European
bannedlist offrom
registered
Council,
meetinglobbyists
thewithCouncil
according
of Ministers
unregistered to different
and and
lobbyists Permanent
categories, Rep
should obligsu
- Lobby rules should apply Noalso to the European Council, the Council of Ministers and Permanent Rep
Visitors of the website s No
No
kenn ich nicht, kann ich nix zu sagen. No
Die Transparenz soll ste No
No
Die bisherige Unterteilung des Registers in Kategorien ist nicht hinreichend
konkret. Auerdem ist sicherzustellen, Yes dass Kommunen, No ihre Zusammenschlsse
Die Verfgbarkeit kann icPolitik ist und war sch No
und Verbnde aus den oben beschriebenen Grnden unabhngig von einer
This must be strengthened
Registrierung die VorteileNo genieen, die in Punkt 5.1 des vorliegenden
Fragebogens genannt sind. No
No
Wenn EUROPA nicht zerbr No
Yes No
Die bisherige Unterteilung des Registers in Kategorien ist nicht hinreichend
It can only see a list, not konkret.
Die what was
von den done by the
Lobbyisten l No
angegebenen
- Further Auerdem
important changes beyond theDaten
ist sicherzustellen, dass sollten
Kommunen,
legally bindingauflobby
den
ihreWahrheitsgehalt
Zusammenschlsse
register berprft werden.
are required:
Kontakte
und Verbndeder Lobbyisten
aus den No
sollten
oben offengelegt
beschriebenen werden.
Grnden unabhngig von einer
-Further
Improved monitoring
important changes of thebeyond
data entries,
the legally as lobbyists frequently
binding lobby enter
register areinaccurate
required: or even
Suchfunktion nach Katego Registrierung
frivolous
Improveddata die Vorteile
monitoring of theNogenieen, die in
data entries, asPunkt 5.1 des
lobbyists vorliegenden
frequently enter inaccurate or even frivolous data
Fragebogens
-Improved
Improvedsanctions genannt
sanctions sind.
No inaccurate
totopunish
punish inaccurateorormisleading
misleadinginformation,
information,such suchasasthrough
throughsuspension from
The website has seen many suspension
All EU improvementsfrom the
decision-makers and No become
registry
has
should andbefrom
bannedmeeting
more from with
user-friendly politicians.
meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige
Visitors of the website should All
Lobby EUberules
decision-makers
ableshould andshould
to viewapply Noalso tobe
order the banned
thefull
European
list offrom meetinglobbyists
registered
Council, withCouncil
the unregistered
according lobbyists
of Ministers andand
to different should oblige
Permanent
categories, Repr
suc
-Permettre
Lobby rules shouldcolleNo
un accs apply also to the European Council, the Council of Ministers and Permanent Rep
In addition to the above comments, No including about the need for the introduction of a legally- binding l
Effective data monitoring:Yes The quality of the data No in the lobby register is extremely poor and Transpare
Improved sanctions to boost data quality and registrations: Submitting inaccurate and / or misleading
Meetings with registered Yes
lobbyists: No lobby meeting policy should be immediately ext
Further important changes beyond The Commission's
the legally binding lobby register are required:
Include themonitoring
EuropeanofCouncil, Yes Yes representations: The European Council and C
Improved the dataCouncil
entries,and as permanent
lobbyists frequently enter inaccurate or even frivolous data
Visitors of the website should Changes
Improvedbe able
to the
to view
lobby
sanctions toand No
transparency
orderinaccurate
punish the full
register
listorofmisleading
disclosure
registeredrequirements:
lobbyists
information, A series
such of detailed
as through changesfrom
suspension are
according to different
The website has seen many categories,
Financial
All EU such
disclosure:
improvements as
decision-makersnumber
and hasLobby
Noof
shouldlobbyists
turnover
become employed,
be banned should be
more user-friendly budget,
disclosed issues
to nearest
covered.
10,000
from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige
Visitors of the website should Das
Lobby Transparenzregister
berules
ableshould andNo
to viewapply order
also tothethefull
European
list of registered
Council,lobbyists
the Council according
of Ministers
to different
and Permanent
categories, Repr
suc
No
Further important changes beyond the legally binding lobby register are required:
- Improved
Die monitoring
bisherige Unterteilungof the
desdata entries,inasKategorien
Registers lobbyists frequently enter inaccurate or even frivolous da
ist nicht hinreichend
La recherche par critre -Le contrle
Improved
konkret. des entres
sanctions
Auerdem No
isttosicherzustellen,
punish inaccuratedassorKommunen,
misleading information, such as through suspension from
ihre Zusammenschlsse
Stopt the register....stop -Lobbying
All EU is criminal.....
decision-makers No
und Verbnde aus den oben beschriebenen Grnden unabhngig von einerlobbyists and should oblig
should be banned from meeting with unregistered
Visitors of the website s Registrierung
- Lobby rules should apply
die Vorteile No also to thedie
genieen, European
in Punkt Council, the Council of Ministers and Permanent Rep
5.1 des vorliegenden
Fragebogens genannt sind. No
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
les informations financi No
A similar kind of regist Yes No
Die bisherige Unterteilung des Registers erschei No
No
No
Yes No
Re. the search function, there should definitely b No
Full details of everyone There is a need for effe No
No
The following links may be Yesuseful:- Yes
No
The Irish lobbying register and website is at https://www.lobbying.ie/
Die Suchfunktion bedarf Beispiele: Frauen, Gesc No
Kategorie VI scheint berdurchschnittlich
All material of theviele No of Public Expenditure and Reform on the development of the Regulatio
Department
No
http://www.per.gov.ie/en/regulation-of-lobbying/
No
The following is the link The Regulation of Lobbying No Act 2015 is at http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2015/act/5/enacted/en/h
berwachung auf unangemessene No Eingaben.
Yes
Strenge Sanktionierung unangemessener No
oder irrefhrender Angaben.
Yes
Allen EU-Entscheidungstrgern sollte verboten sein, No opinion
sich mit unregistrierten Lobbyisten zu treffen. Alle
Man sollte nach verschi Die Regeln sollten auch No fr den Europischen Rat gelten, nicht nur fr Parlament und Komission!
Kategorie VI scheint berdurchschnittlich viele No
Die Transparenzregeln sollten No auch fr den Europischen Rat, den Ministerrat und alle EU-Behrden
Listenfunktionen erweit Das Register muss engmaschig No berwacht werden, fehlende oder falsche Eintrge sollten verfolgt we
Weitere nderungen nebe No
Yes Yes
Further
Further important
important changes
changes beyond
beyond the
the legally
legally binding
binding lobby
lobby register
register are
are required:
required:
Improved monitoring of No data entries, as lobbyists frequently
the enter inaccurate or
Improved
Um monitoring
das Vertrauen of the data entries, as lobbyists frequently enter inaccurate or even
even frivolous
frivolous data
data
Improved sanctionsderto europischen
No inaccurate
punish BrgerInnen in dieinformation,
or misleading Europischen such Institutionen
as throughzu strken,
suspension sollte
from
-All
Aufstockung der personellen
EU decision-makers No Ressourcen
should be bannedorfrom des Registersekretariats,
meetinginformation, sodass
with unregistered eine systematische
lobbyists undobr
Improved sanctions to EntscheidungstrgerInnen
punish inaccurate misleading suchund as throughand should be
suspension from
Visitors of the website s -Lobby
Treffen europischer
rules should applyNo also to the European Council, nur mitthe LobbystInnen
Council of Ministers InteressensvertreterInnen
and Permanent Repr
- Beschrnkung der Zahl der Treffen europischer EntscheidungstrgerInnen mit LobbystInnen der W
Kategorie VI scheint berdurchschnittlich
All viele No
EU decision-makers
- Einheitliche Regeln frshould be banned from
eine ausgewogene meeting von
Besetzung with ExpertInnengruppen
unregistered lobbyists and die
durch should oblige
Kommissi
Kategorie
The websiteVI has
scheint
seenberdurchschnittlich
many improvements viele
and No
has become more user-friendly
auch VertreterInnen der ArbeitnehmerInnen, von Umweltinteressen sowie der Zivilgesellschaft gleichw
Visitors of the website should
Lobby berules
ableshould
- Regelmige to und
viewapply
andNo
aktuelle order
also tothe
thefull
European
list of registered
Verffentlichungen Council, lobbyists
the Council
von Tagesordnungen according
ofund
Ministers
to different
and Permanent
Protokollen categories,
der Repr
suc
ExpertInnen
- Einfhrung des legislativen Yes Fuabdruckes welcher No offenlegen wrde, welche LobbyistInnen Berich
Die BAK regt die Verffe- Verffentlichung der Dokumente Yes aus dem TrilogYes in systematischer und zeitnaher Form.
Kategorie VI scheint berdurchschnittlich viele No
N.A. Zusammenfassend mussNo sowohl das Lobbyregister deutlich an Verbindlichkeit gewinnen, als auch au
Es sollte die Mglichkei Fr die Entscheidungstrger No & deren Mitarbeiter (!) mssen die selben Regeln gelten; alle mssen ihr
Yes No
Kategorie VI scheint berdurchschnittlich viele No
No
No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
There should be a specific search function to seaNo
Yes No opinion
Yes No
Yes No
No
No
Yes No
We would like to stress Yes No
No
Die Unterteilung des Regi No
No
No
Yes No
Yes No
The Register should keeYes Yes
The Register's website is quite technical and stri No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes Yes
Upon registration in the Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Wir haben uns bislang nicht registriert, deshalb No
Yes Yes
No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
Yes Yes
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Jestemy przeciwni nadmi No
Yes Yes
Estendere il modello dei registro della trasparenzYes Yes
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
The focus of transparencYes No opinion
Yes No
Il giudizio espresso p Persone che si sono macch No
Yes No
non ho mai utilizzato il s tenere conto anche delleYes Yes
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
Es kann nicht angehen, No
Yes No
No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
It should be filled in English, otherwise it is no No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes Yes
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Weg mit den Abgeordneten, Brger sollen per CoNo
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Fit for purpose and speed effective No
Yes No
No
Historic records should be easily available, for Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
It would be useful to check accessibility of the weNo
To be truly effective an Yes No opinion
No
No
Yes Yes
Yes No
No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
No
No
No
No
Meetings with registeredNo lobbyists: The Commission's lobby meeting policy should be immediately ext
No
Include the European Council,Yes Council and permanent Yes representations: The European Council and C
Yes
In addition to the above comments, including about Nothe need for the introduction of a legally-binding lo
Kategorie VI scheint berdurchschnittlich viele No
Effective
unabhngige data NGOs
monitoring:
haben
YesThe quality of the data No in the lobby register is extremely poor and Transpare
Yes No
Improved sanctions to boost Yes data quality and registrations:
No Submitting inaccurate and / or misleading
No
Meetings with registered lobbyists: The Commission's lobby meeting policy should be immediately ext
Yes No
No
Include the European Council, Council and permanent representations: The European Council and C
Not at all clear on how t There is very little tru Yes No opinion
Changes to the lobby transparency
Yes register disclosureNo requirements: A series of detailed changes are
Yes No
Creare un'applicazione che -consenta
Financialladisclosure:
consultazio
YesLobby turnover should be disclosed to the nearest 10,000 euros and not acc
Nothe
In addition to the above comments, including about need for the introduction of a legally-binding lo
Most documents are in English or French. Trans Yes No
-Lobby issue disclosure: All lobby consultancies and law firms should be required to list, alongside
Effective
There shoulddata be
monitoring:
checks Yes The quality of the data No in the lobby register is extremely poor and Transpare
opinion
It is true to say that the register website was improved Yes in the relaunch of April
Yes 2015. However we wish to make these commen
- Lobbyists' names disclosure: All individuals lobbying on behalf of a registrant should be listed
Very well designed. Improved sanctions to boost
Thanks of the grateful o Yes data quality and registrations:
No Submitting inaccurate and / or misleading
- The search function should be improved and sensitised. For example, a search for exxon only pulls up two lobby firms whic
- Disclosure of lobbying Yes through third parties: Registrants
Yes should specify all third party organisations
- Participation in EU structures
Meetings andwith
platforms
registered
should
lobbyists:
be viaThea direct
Commission's
link to the Commissions
lobby meeting expert
policy should
groupsbe database,
immediately
so that
ext
Yes
- A list of 100 most recent registrants would be useful. The present list is too short. Yes
The volume
- The news listing is not prominent
Include of interactio
theenough
European isYes
andCouncil,
too farCouncil
down the andhome No All
permanent
page. representations:
'news' postingsTheshould
European
be notified
Council
to those
and Cr
- Currently data on the Commissions lobby meetings Yes is provided only via numerous No html pages. This data should also be prov
- We also propose that the Changes
technicalto team
the lobby
for the
transparency
Yes
lobby registerregister
should disclosure
be No
open requirements:
for practical suggestions
A series of detailed
by outsidechanges
users. are
Absolutly integrity - ethi No
Further important changes beyond the legally binding lobby register are required:
Yes No
ZaImproved monitoring
transparentnost of the data
je bistveno,
Yes
entries, as lobbyists
da registriranje postane frequently
No opinionzakonsko enter inaccurate
obvezno, or even
da se ohrani frivolous
sedanja defid
Improved sanctions to punish inaccurate or misleading information, such as through suspension fro
The website has seenZa many
All EU
improvements
decision-makers
andYeshas
should
become fromNo
uinkovito delovanje registra jebe banned
more zagotoviti
potrebno user-friendly
meeting
dovolj with unregistered
osebja, lobbyists
ki bo lahko znatenanddelshould
vnosovbetu
Visitors of the website should
Lobbyberules
ableshould Yesorder
to viewapply
and also tothe
thefull
European No
list of registered
Council,lobbyists
the Council
according
of Ministers
to different
and Permanent
categories,Res
No
Raziriti je treba seznam oseb, za katere veljajo pravila o transparentnosti. Veljati bi moralo, da se no
Yes No
Yes
Za etinost lobiranja je bistveno, da se zmanja celoten Yes obseg lobiranja in zagotovi uravnoteena zas
No
international zionists !!! No
representations.
Changes to the lobby transparency register disclosure requirements: A series of detailed
changes
In addition are
to required
the above to comments,
the rules of including
the lobbyabout
register theinneed
orderfor tothe
further boost data
introduction of aquality
legally-binding lo
and to ensure that the register presents a reliable picture of lobbying at the EU level:

DieFinancial
Effective
bisherigedisclosure:
data monitoring:
Unterteilung Lobbydesturnover
The quality
Registersofshould
the databe indisclosed
in Kategorien the ist
lobby toregister
nicht the nearest 10,000 poor and Transpare
is extremely
hinreichend
euros
konkret. and not according
Auerdem to the presentdass
ist sicherzustellen, system of wide brackets.
Kommunen, Lobby spending
ihre Zusammenschlsse
should
Improved be sanctions
und Verbnde disclosed
aus dento boost
to the
oben nearest
data 10,000and
quality
beschriebenen euros.
registrations:
Grnden Submitting
unabhngig von inaccurate
einer and / or misleading
Lobby issue disclosure:
Registrierung die VorteileNo All lobby consultancies
genieen, die in Punkt 5.1 anddeslawvorliegenden
firms should be required to
Die
list, bisherige
Meetings withUnterteilung
alongside the specific
registered des Registers
lobby revenue
lobbyists: in Kategorien
received
The Commission's ist
fromlobby
eachnicht hinreichend
client,
meeting the precise
policy should be immediately ext
Fragebogens genannt sind.
No
konkret.
issues upon Auerdem
which theyist sicherzustellen, dass Kommunen,
lobby and / or advise each client.ihre Zusammenschlsse
Die bisherige Unterteilung
unddes Registers
Verbnde ist ni
aus den No
oben beschriebenen Grnden
Lobbyists'
Include names
the European disclosure:
Council, All individuals
Council lobbyingunabhngig
and permanent on behalf ofvon
representations: einer
a registrant should Council and C
The European
Registrierung
be listed die VorteileYes genieen, die in Punkt Yes 5.1 des vorliegenden
Fragebogens
Disclosure genannt
of lobbying Yes
sind.
through third parties: Yes
Registrants should specify all third
Changes to the lobby transparency register disclosure requirements: A series of detailed changes are
party
which No
Financial disclosure: Lobby turnover should be disclosed to the nearestindicate
organisations it pays through which it conducts its lobbying and 10,000 euros and not acc
how
much itissue
Lobby paysdisclosure:
to them. Yes All lobby consultancies Yesand law firms should be required to list, alongside
BUSINESSEUROPE encourages the Commission
Lobbyists' Yesand ParlAll individuals lobbying
names disclosure: No on behalf of a registrant should be listed
Disclosure of lobbying Nothrough third parties: Registrants should specify all third party organisation
No
Aufbau und Struktur des Transparenzregister-Portals sollten dringend verbessert werden, um Fehlinterpretationen und reputat
Yes No
Insbesondere die Kategorien Vollzeitquivalent (VZ)" Yes und Zahl der beteiligten No Personen" fhren zu Missverstndnissen, we
Very easy to access, immediatly in your home l No
Das Transparenzregister-Portal sollte einen eindeutigen Yes Hinweis enthalten, Nodass geschtzte Kosten fr EU-Interessenvertretu
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes Yes
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes Yes
No
No
Ergnzend zu der Einfhrung No eines rechtlich verbindlichen Lobbyregisters sind weitere Manahmen e
1. Effektive Datenkontrolle ist essentiell: Damit Brger Vertrauen in das System haben, muss die Ko
The
2. current - optional - Yes mssen erleichtert und
Sanktionsmglichkeiten Yesverbessert werden. Fehlangaben mssen durch A
The objective of improved3. Schon jetzt sollte Kommissions-BedienstetenNo
communication within th
Yes opinion werden, sich mit nicht registrierten Lobby
untersagt
4. Der Rat und die Stndigen No Vertretungen der Mitgliedstaaten mssen ins Lobbyregister einbezoge
5. Die Offenlegungspflichten Yes sind ein Bereich im Nobestehenden
opinion Register, der konkret verbessert werd
Ergnzend zu der Einfhrung eines rechtlich verbindlichen Lobbyregisters sind weitere Manahmen e
Yes No
1. Effektive Datenkontrolle ist essentiell: Damit Brger Vertrauen in das System haben, muss die Ko
2. Sanktionsmglichkeiten Yes mssen erleichtert und No verbessert werden. Fehlangaben mssen durch A
No
3. Schon jetzt sollte Kommissions-Bediensteten untersagt werden, sich mit nicht registrierten Lobby
4. Der Rat und die Stndigen No Vertretungen der Mitgliedstaaten mssen ins Lobbyregister einbezoge
5. Die Offenlegungspflichten No sind ein Bereich im bestehenden Register, der konkret verbessert werd
Die bisherige Unterteilung des Registers ist nic No
Yes No
Be objective and do not We do not trust EU beuroNo
Yes No
No further comments No
No
No
No
Effective data monitoring: The quality of the data in the lobby register is extremely poor. Transparency International estimates
Improved sanctions to boost data quality and registrations: Submitting inaccurate and / or misleading information must be spec
The structure
Meetings with of the Transparency
registered lobbyists:Register
The portalNo
Commission's should
lobbybe meeting
improvedpolicy
in order to avoid
should misinterpretation
be immediately and so
extended reputation damag
that no Comm
Fehlerhafte, wissentlich
Include the European Council, Council and permanent representations: The European Council and Council are significant EU
In particular, thelobby
categories "full-timeregister
equivalent No and "number of persons involved," lead to misunderstandings, if users
(FTE)"
Changes to the transparency disclosure requirements: A series of detailed changes are required to the rules of t
It would be useful for EUYes
Financial disclosure: Lobby turnover should be disclosed to the nearest 10,000 No euros and not according to the present system
The Transparency
Lobby issue disclosure: It
Register would
All lobby be good to
portalconsultancies get
should contain Yes
a clear
and indication
law firms shouldthat
be theYes
estimated
required to list,costs for EUthe
alongside advocacy
specificare repeatedly
lobby revenuere
re
Yes
Lobbyists' names disclosure: All individuals lobbying on behalf of a registrant No should be listed.
Disclosure of lobbying through third parties: Registrants Yes should specify all No
third party organisations which it pays through which
Yes No
No
Yes No opinion
Kategorie VI scheint berdurchschnittlich viele No
Kategorie VI scheint berdurchschnittlich viele No
No
Kategorie VI scheint berdurchschnittlich viele No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
The links about the various meetings with the E Yes
Le MEDEF encourage la Commission et la Parlement faciliter la divulgation No de l'identit des membres des structures europ
Kategorie VI scheint b Beachtung der Stuttgart No
Afin d'viter toute surcharge administrative, nous recommandons que les institutions europennes elles-mmes tablissent un
Dans un tel cas, un simple lien pourrait tre insr Yes No opinion
dans le registre de transparence.
Yes No
I have not done researchThe present lobby registeNo
Kategorie VI scheint berdurchschnittlich viele No
Yes No
Le registre devrait tre Yes No
No
No
No
No
Yes No
No
Your explanatory video
Der gegenwrtige AufbauThe deswebsite
Portalsneeds to zu
fhrt oft meeNo
fehlerhafter und negativer Berichterstattung. Besonders die Kategorien Vollz
Auerdem sollte das Portal den eindeutigen Hinweis No enthalten, dass die Kosten der EU-Interessenvertretung auf der Basis vo
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
the number given toe achteh ergister should have Yes No
The CJEU prohibits goveYes No
No
Yes No
No
In our view, the general balance achieved since 2011 and confirmed in the following revisions that con
All organisations should Yes No
An exception would concern Yes the fact that a number Noof entities that have registered in the Transparenc
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
The search function should
encourages
be improved.
registrants
To improve
to provide
general
accurate
accessibility
information.
and relevance
Organisations
of displayed
that do not comply with the

information, an (advanced)
rules
search
should
function
be sanctioned
should allow
subject
comparing,
to due process,
ranking,including
and visualizing
an independent body to rule on alleged

different entries. Search violations


results areand
notan
ranked
appeal
andprocedure.
do not currently display the information that was

searched for each result


These
has to
demands
be opened
are individually
supported
No by
to over
get the
60,000
desired
citizens
data.who
Transparency
have signed our online petition
Vollstndige Transparen Yes No
Internationals www.integritywatch.eu
(change.org/eu-lobbying) is a good example as wellofasvisually
XX lobby presenting
organisations the data representing
in a XX lobbyists that have co-
No
Kategorie
searchableVIway. scheint berdurchschnittlich
signed a joint letter: vieleLobbyistsNo for transparent lobbying.
To avoid misinterpretation, the category of "peop Yes No
Moreover, the search function Make
OK as is should
the negations
be grantedon the
a
Yes prominent
Inter-Institutional
place onAgreement
the Nomain page as open of theandRegister
transparent as possible
possibilit aux groupes Yes Yes
and not be part of the subsection
Transparency calledInternational
Consult Yes thehas Register.
activelyThe followed
search negotiations
Nofield that remains on previous
on allIIAs. Unfortunately, these
DI invites the Commission The and forthcoming
ParliamentInter-Institutional
to prom Yes Agreement, reviewing No the functioning of the Register, is a unique op
pages
The EUinTransparency
the top right cornernegotiations
Register
Putting should allow
website
in placebehind toeffective
should
an search
closedbeYes for
doors
the other
system
EU dotoorganisations
not attract
institutions
motivate the
central
allNo when
same
hub already
transparency
organisations
for on
information a page
influencing standards
on the as ordinary
EUlegislative
decision-making processtoand si
The availability of information Ensuring / documents
that the new on the Transparency
register canRegisterbe further covers
improved all EU byinstitutions
merging orinvolved connecting in the existing
political informatio
decisio
of the register, rather Yes means No
There should also be than
morelegislative
searching
Designingguidance procedures,
a the
robust (unconnected)
for registrants.
system which Thewww.europa.eu
with better that
introduction
legalcitizens domain
definitions,cannot
of automatic and
easily
monitoring not follow
plausibilityyielding the exchange
procedures
checks would of arguments.
and sanctions
avoid commonthat encmis
The search function should For
These at skabe
be improved. mere
demands are benhed
To improve
supportedNo og gennemsigtighed
general
by over accessibility
67,000 citizens kunne et
and relevance fremtidig
who haveofsigned vrktj
displayed vre,
our online at
information, udbygge
petition fx EUR
an(change.o
(advance
results
Der brfrom
Moreover, thesearch
skabes
the register.
langt st We
functionMake hope thethat
should thegranted
negations
be newonstandards
Yes
the
a prominent for lobbying
Inter-Institutional transparency
theYes
place onAgreement main page aswill ofnot
open the be
and drawn
Register
transparentup
andinnot thebe
as samepart opaque
possible of the su
Wie bereits
Finally, erwhntshould
the website (siehe Ausfhrliches
Transparency
also in A1.2
provideInternational
easy access Yeshas to historic
activelydata followed No
(old versions
negotiations of the onregister)
previoustoIIAs. enable Unfortunately,
comparisonthese and mo n
To further simplify the process fashion forasheavy
previous users,agreements.
the Yes data ofWe thetherefore
Transparency suggest
YesRegisterthat meetingsshould also of thebe high-level working group
Yes No
made available in API format of thetoEuropean allow users Commission,
to retrieve the Parliament
most up-to- and dateCouncil datathatdirectly
will discuss
from the the new IIA should be open to
A supposedly
Effective data non-binding
monitoring:Yes The quality of the data No in the lobby register is extremely poor and Transpare
The forthcoming Inter-Institutional
A formal Agreement,
letter reviewing the functioning ofYes the Register, is a unique opportunity / for substantial
database. This would make Improved
the itpublic
easier andforfrom
sanctions otherth
web-streamed. Yes data
toorganisations
boost Thequality
draft and registrations:
to develop
agreement, tools and
proposed Submitting
applications changes, inaccurate
that agendas and and minutes
or misleading
should
The Registers search function Meetings withberegistered
could improvedYes lobbyists: The Commission's Yes lobby meeting policy should be immediately ext
Putting in place an effective system to motivate all organisations influencing EU decision-making The European Council andUn
to sign up to the Register.
use information from the Includealso be the
Transparency made European
available
Register, Council,
online.
such
Yes as Council
Corporate and Europe
permanent Yes representations:
Observatorys LobbyFacts C
It is true to say that the register
Changes website
to the was lobby improved
transparency
No in the register
relaunchdisclosure
of April 2015. requirements:
However we wish to make these commen
Ensuring
- The search thatfunction
the newshould
Transparency
Financial be improved Register
disclosure: andcovers
sensitised.
Lobby all EU institutions involved
searchinfor the political decision-making process: this m
No turnover For example,
should be a disclosed toexxon
the nearest
only pulls
10,000 up euros
two lobby and firms
not accord
whic
- Participation in EU structures
As Lobby
questesand
issueplatforms
dadisclosure: should
transparncia, All lobby
beigualdade
viaconsultancies
a direct de link toand
acesso, theequidade,
law
Commissions
firms should expert
integridadebe required
groups
e todatabase,
diversidadelist, alongsideso that thn
Designing a robust system The withforthcoming
betterwould
legal Inter-Institutional
definitions,
Yes toThe Agreement,
monitoring reviewing
procedures andthe
Yesshort. functioning
sanctions thatofencourages
the Register, is de
registrants opinio
ashould
unique op
tolink
pr
- A list of 100 most recent 1)Noregistrants
lobbyist
Registo should
obrigatrio bebe useful.
em able todas represent
as present an
list
instituies unregistered
is datoo UE; client and declarations of clients
The
The EU Transparency
Federation of Register
Putting
Enterprises inwebsite
in place
Belgium should
an effective
encourag be Yesthe system
EU institutions
to motivate central
allYesorganisations
hub for information
influencing on the
EU legislative
decision-making process toand
si
- The news listing is not prominent
Lobbyists'
2) enough
Obrigatoriedade namesand disclosure:
dethe is too os
todos farAlldown
individuals
the home
intervenientes lobbying
page.on
polticos All behalf
'news' of postings
a registrantshould should
be notified
be listed.to those
a enr
The availability of information
Ensuring / documents
thatof the new
on Transparency
register canRegister
be only
further covers
improved alleEU agentes
byhtml pblicos
institutions
merging da UE
orinvolved
connecting in s
the recorrerem
existing
political
alsoinformatio
decisio
-The quality data
Currently of theondata
the in 3)the
Commissions Register
Disclosure
Sistema de is
lobbypoor.
lobbying
registo Itpblico
meetings No
through isdeprovided
third parties:
reunies via
Registrants
numerous
(intervenientes, should
assuntos pages.
specify This
all third
data party
debatidos/apresentados,should organisationsbe
datasprovew
There should also bethatmore Designing
guidance a team
robust
forbe registrants.
system with
The better
introduction
legal definitions,
ofbeautomatic monitoring
plausibility procedures
checks would
and sanctions
avoid commonthat encmis
- We also propose the 4)There
technical
Sistema should for
compulsory
de monitorizao;the Yes
lobby twice-a-year
register should updates No
opento the
for practical
lobby register
suggestions
including by financial
outside users.
informatio
The search function should Thesebe improved.
demands are
To improve
supported general
by over accessibility
67,000 citizens and relevance
who haveofsigned displayed our online
information,
petition an(change.o
(advance
cluttered and long winded
Moreover, the search function 5) Sistema
Makeshould punitivo
the negations
be granted para
on the Yes
ano cumpridores
prominent place(para
Inter-Institutional onAgreement
the No
ambas
mainopinion
asaspartes)
page open
of the andRegister
transparentand not as be possible
part of the su
Finally, the website should A criao
Transparency
also provide de um sistema
International
easy access Yes
que togaranta
has historic
actively odata
conhecimento
followed No pblico
(old versions
negotiations of the da
on "pegada
register)
previous legislativa",
toIIAs.
enable isto , onde
Unfortunately,
comparison and se
these mo
n
No
Spotkania wycznie z zarejestrowanymi Yes lobbystami: Yes Obowizek spotykania si wycznie z zarejestro
Certaines fonctionnalits amliorer notamment Yes No
Objcie Rejestrem Rady Europejskiej, Rady Unii Europejskich
und als iPartnerorganisation
Yes No opinion staych przedstawicielstw pastw czo
internationale NGOs mit ECOSOC Status in der UNO in der EU-Grundre
Zum Beispiel hat die international Yes ttige NGO-Organisation Yes Verein zur Frderung der Vlkerverstndig
Zmiany dot. zakresu informacji podlegajcych ujawnieniu w Rejestrze Przejrzystoci: wymagany jest s
Yes No
Yes
ujawnienie informacji finansowych: wydatki na dziaalno No lobbingow powinny by ujawniane w przyb
ujawnienie przedmiotu lobbingu: Yes wszystkie firmy lobbingowe No i kancelarie prawne powinny by zobowi
dane personale osb dziaajcych No w imieniu zarejestrowanych lobbystw: wszystkie osoby wykonujc
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
No
Aufbau und Struktur des Transparenzregister-Portals sollten dringend verbessert werden, um Fehlinterpretationen und reputat
In a democratic society, Yes No
Yes
Insbesondere die Kategorien "Vollzeitquivalent (VZ)" und "Zahl der beteiligten No Personen" fhren zu Missverstndnissen, we
Aufbau und Struktur des Transparenzregister-Portals sollten dringend verbessertYes No opinion werden, um Fehlinterpretationen und reputat
Das Transparenzregister-Portal sollte einen eindeutigen Yes Hinweis enthalten,
erhalten,No dassgeschtzte
dass geschtzteKosten Kostenfr frEU-Interessenvertretun
EU-Interessenvertretu
Yes No
No
Yes No
It is essential to ensur No
There should be a clear interface between the regYes No
No
All EU officials, Permanent Representations representatives and partially MEPs, should not be allowe

More specific data should be disclosed

Dataforthcoming
The entered intoInter-Institutional
the TR should beAgreement, specific enough reviewingto provide a real picture
the functioning of the ofRegister,
the lobbying is a activities
unique op
The EU Transparency
We would welcome if being Register
Putting website
in
a member
In addition place should
an effective
of organisa
to the be Yes
above comments,thesystem
EU institutions
to motivate central
including about all organisations
hub for information
influencingon the
EU legislative
decision-making
Yesthe need for a legally-binding lobby register, furthe process toand
si
The availability of information All lobbying
Ensuring/ documents
that consultancies
the new
on the and lawcan
Transparency
register firms should
Register
be further be
covers required
improved all EU by tomerging
list not only
institutions or their clients
involved
connecting in the and the
existing
political revenu
informatio
decisio
I tried to find any info The
If thequality
EU does of the
notdatabecom inNo the lobby register is extremely poor and Transparency International estimate
There should also be more Designing
guidance
Submitting ainaccurate
robust
for registrants.
system
and /with
The better
introduction
or misleading legalinformation
definitions,
of automatic monitoring
must plausibility
be specifiedprocedures
checks
as an would
and
offence, sanctions
avoid common
that enc
punishable mis
by
The search function should All individuals,
Thesebe improved.
demands andare
To not
improve Yes
only the
supported ones
general
by over that
accessibility
67,000 No
are accredited
citizens
and to access
relevance
who have of the
signed EPour
displayed premises,
online
information, should
petitionan be listed i
(change.o
(advance
The Commission's lobbyYes meeting policy should beNo immediately extended so that no Commission offic
Moreover, the search function Make
The should
the negations
European beCouncil
granted onand the
a prominent
Inter-Institutional
Council areplace onAgreement
the main
significant page
as open
EU institutions of the and
and Register
transparent
the EUand lobby not
asregister
be
possible
partshould
of the be su
Finally, the
Aufbau undwebsite
Strukturshoulddes If aalso
registrant
Transparencyprovide isInternational
Transparenzregister-Portals usingaccess
easy a help
Yeshas of
to aactively
third
historic
sollten party
data toverbessert
followed
dringend (old conduct
No itswerden,
versions
negotiations lobbying
of theon
A series of detailed changes are required to the rules of the lobby register in order to further boost dat
it should
register)
previous
um to be Unfortunately,
IIAs.
enable specified so in these
comparison the
and TR.
mo
n
Fehlinterpretationen und reputationsschdigende
Lobby Yes
Berichterstattung zu Yes
vermeiden.
Der Aufbau und die Struktur desspending should be disclosed
Transparenzregisters sollten to the nearest
dringend 10,000werden,
verbessert euros. um Fehlinterpretationen entgegenz
All lobby consultancies Yeslaw firms should be required
and No
Eu-Logos Athna estime que le registre de transparence to list, alongside
devrait the specific
tre obligatoire lobbyorganisatio
pour toute revenue r
Insbesondere
mai consultatodie von
Die Verfgbarkeit Kategorien Vollzeitquivalent
All individuals
Informationen bzw.lobbying
Unterlagen (VZ)"
onNobehalfistundof Zahl der fr
a registrant
gegenwrtig beteiligten
should Personen"
be
alle eingetragenenlisted fhren zu nicht immer vergleich
Stakeholder
Missverstndnissen,
We consider the availabi wenn die Nutzer
Registrants nicht
should mit den
specify Yes Leitlinien
alldethird fr die
party Umsetzung
organisations Nodu which des Transparenzregisters
it pays through which it conducts its lobb
Aufbau und
vertraut sind.Struktur des De plus, il serait
Transparenzregister-Portals
Der Transparenzregister-Portal
Informationsgehalt
intressant
ber deneinen tatschlichen
signaler
sollten sur
dringend
personellen
laverbessert
fiche
Aufwand
registre
werden,
im
deumchaque
Zusammenhang
organisation
Fehlinterpretationen
mit EU
inscrite leur
und reputat co
Zudem sollte das Yes eindeutigen Hinweis enthalten,
No dass geschtzte Kosten frInteressenvertre
die EU-Interess
beteiligten Personen. Um Transparenz zu strken und Fehlinterpretationen zu vermeiden, sollte die Kategorie
Il est importantdie
Insbesondere deKategorien
garde Pour "Vollzeitquivalent
finir, il faudrait bien Yes garderund lesprit
"Zahl que la procdure
No dinscription ne devrait pas salourdir afin d
Zahl der beteiligten Personen" daher gestrichen(VZ)" und aktiv gegen der beteiligten
eine irrefhrende Personen"
Darstellung fhren
vonzu Missverstndnissen, we
The website has
Informationen ausbeendemimproved a lot since the
Transparenzregister durchbeYes Dritte vorgegangen werden. No
Das Transparenzregister-Portal sollte einen eindeutigen Yes Hinweis enthalten, Nodass geschtzte Kosten fr EU-Interessenvertretu
The Commission
Das and the Parliament
Transparenzregister-Portal sollteshould facilita
einen eindeutigen Yes Hinweis enthalten, Nodass geschtzte Kosten fr EU Interessenvertretun
Berechnungen zu Lobbying-Ausgaben einzelner Sektoren Yes methodische Schwchen No sowie verzerrte Ergebnisse enthalten. Ku
Yes No
No
In addition to the above comments, Yes including about Nothe need for the introduction of a legally-binding lo
Kategorie VI scheint b No
Effective data monitoring: The quality of the data in the lobby register is extremely poor and Transpare
Es ist sicherzustellen, No
It would besanctions
Improved appropriate t Yes data quality and registrations:
to boost No Submitting inaccurate and / or misleading
Yes No
No further
Aufbau undcomments. See
Struktur des Meetings attached with written
registered
Transparenzregister-Portals su No lobbyists:
solltenThe Commission's
dringend verbessert lobby
werden,meeting um policy should be immediately
Fehlinterpretationen und reputat ext
Insbesondere die Kategorien Vollzeitquivalent (VZ)" No und Zahl der beteiligten Personen" fhren zu Missverstndnissen, we
Das Transparenzregister-Portal Include the European
Die Transparenz
sollte einen Council, Council
dereindeutigen
poliYes Hinweisand permanent
enthalten, Nodassrepresentations:
geschtzte Kosten Thefr European Council and C
EU-Interessenvertretu
Yes No
Changes to the lobby transparencyAgreement,register disclosure requirements: A series
of theof detailedischanges
a uniqueare
did not have time to lookThe be moreforthcoming
clear and Inter-Institutional
comuni No reviewing the functioning Register, op
The EU Transparency Register
PuttingFinancial
website
in place disclosure:
should be Lobby
an effective EUturnover
thesystem should
institutions
to motivate beorganisations
central
all disclosed to the
hub for information nearest
influencingon the 10,000
EU eurosprocess
legislative
decision-making and nottoand acc
si
If I were a citizen with very little
Lobbyinterest issue in No All lobby consultancies and law firms should be required to list, alongside
The availability of information Ensuring/ documents
that the disclosure:
new
on the Transparency
register canRegisterbe further covers
improved all EU byinstitutions
merging orinvolvedconnecting in theexisting
political
informatio
decisio
There should also be more Many
guidance
Designing such
Lobbyists' consultations
fornames
a robust registrants.
system Yes
t with
disclosure:
The betterAll individuals
introduction No monitoring
lobbying
legal definitions,
of automatic on behalfprocedures
plausibility ofchecks
a registrant andshould
would sanctionsbe listed
avoid common that enc mis
IThe
have not seen
search and should
function red It. Ibe
These cannot
Disclosure
improved.
demands commentofare righNothrough
Tolobbying
improve
supported general third
by over parties:citizens
accessibility
67,000 Registrants
and relevance
who have should specify
ofsigned
displayed ourall third petition
online
information,party organisation
an(change.o
(advance
Moreover, the search function Makeshould
the negationsbe granted on the Yes
a prominent
Inter-Institutional theNo
place onAgreement mainopinion
page
as open of the and Register
transparentand not as be
possible
part of the su
Finally, the website should Transparency
also provideInternational
easy access Yeshasto historic
activelydata
followed
(old versions
negotiations
Yes of the onregister)
previoustoIIAs.enable Unfortunately,
comparisonthese and mo n
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Dans un contexte o l'euYes Yes
No
Lobiranje je zame trenutnNo
Setup and structure of the Transparency Registers webpage should be improved as a matter of urgency in order to avoid any
The forthcoming Inter-Institutional No Agreement, reviewing the functioning of the Register, is a unique op
Register
The mora
In particular biti
EU Transparency tudi povezan
figures on Register
full-time z
Putting website
in tokami
placeshould
equivalents vpliva
andbeNo
an effective n thesystem
number EU institutions
of to motivate
persons central
all organisations
involved hub leadfor toinformation
influencingon the
misinterpretation EUlegislative
ifdecision-making
users are process toand
not familia si
Yes No
The availability of information
Registers webpage Ensuring
should / documents
that the
clearly new
on the
indicate Transparency
register
that
Yes estimatedcanRegister
be further
costs ofcovers
EUimproved
No all EU
lobbying byare
institutions
merging
captured orinvolved
connecting
more than in theexisting
oncepolitical
informatio
(doubledecisio
cou
No Comments Yes No
There should
No opinion also be
means: moreDesigning
guidance
featuTransparency, a robust
forbefore
registrants.
system
bein Nowith
The better
introduction
legal definitions,
of automatic monitoring
plausibility procedures
checks would and sanctions
avoid common that enc mis
The search function should be improved. To improve general accessibility and relevance of displayed information, an (advance
No
These demands are supported by over 67,000 citizens who have signed our online petition (change.o
Moreover, the search function should be granted No a prominent place on the main page of the Register and not be part of the su
Make the negations on the YesInter-Institutional Agreement No as open and transparent as possible
Finally, the website should Transparency
also provideInternational
easy accesshas No to historic
activelydata
followed
(old versions
negotiations of the onregister)
previoustoIIAs.enable Unfortunately,
comparisonthese and mo n
Yes Yes
Zustzlich zu den bereits gettigten Bemerkungen und Kommentaren, u.a. zur Notwendigkeit der Ein
Aufbau und Struktur des Transparenzregister-Portals sollten dringend verbessert werden, um Fehlinterpretationen und reputat
Yes No
Effektive Datenberwachung / Effektives Datenmonitoring: Die Qualitt der Daten im Lobbyregister is
-Insbesondere
Die Suchfunktiondie Kategorien Vollzeitquivalent
solle verbessert und sensibilisiertYes
(VZ)" No
und Zahl der beteiligten
werden. Personen" fhren zu Missverstndnissen, we
the website could be
- Eine Liste der letzten 100improved so
Verstrkte data
Registrierungenanalysis
Sanktionen wre i Yes
umhilfreich.
Datenqualitt
Die jetzige ListeNoist mit 10 Eintrgen
und Registrierungen zu frdern:
zuDie
kurz.
Angabe von falschen od
Das
- DieTransparenzregister-Portal
Seite mit Neuigkeiten ist nicht sollte einengenug
zentral eindeutigen
Yes Hinweis
im Portal. enthalten, Nodass
Die Registrierten geschtzte
sollten auf alle Kosten
Updatesfrunter
EU-Interessenvertretu
'Neuigkeiten' hinge
Treffen mit registrierten LobbyistInnen:
Yes Die Regelungen
No zu Treffen zwischen Kommission und Lobbyin
Al di l della obbligator No
The register website hasLobbying and transparency Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
CIP encourages the Commission and Parliament Yes to facilitate the No
disclosure of memberships in EU structures and platforms (high-level groups)
Yes No
as well as to ensure a coherent terminology. It is often very burdensome and
Empowerment of the civilYes
difficult to collect all relevant information. To increase data reliability, No
EURALIA dfend les princYes
we recommend the EU institutions themselves should establish a fully No
The information in the Transparency Register can Yes
integrated, accurate database covering all EU advisory structures and No
platforms and to link it to the EU Transparency Register. Yes No
AmCham EU takes note of the Transparency Registe Yes No
Unless already aware of the existence of the Tra Yes No
A registry of the meetin Yes No
Yes No
We doubt the need to putYes No
Il giudizio sul sito web positivo:
To
- avoid misinterpretation,
concezione e struttura:therisultano
categorychiari
of "peop Yes
ed immediati; No si segnala lopportunit della presenza della m
quale suggerimento
- Yes
disponibilit di informazione e documenti: il sito fornisce informazioni; Noi documenti cercati risultano disponibili; si segnala
- Accessibilit: molto buono per cromatismi eYes No pu migliorare con l'aggiunta di scorciatoie da ta
semplicit di visione; il sito
La base giuridica del regNo
In sum, the Register website Die bisherige Unterteil
is a sufficiently No tool to work with and broadly achieves the desired objectives. Some info
effective
Yes No
I would like to mention and support below mentioned part of the statement of the Bavarian State Gove
No
siehe Ziffer 2.2 Unabhngig
"The Bavarian von einer
State Re No
Government takes note of the fact that, while regional authorities and their repres
of the Transparency Yes would be blurred if No
Register, contacts onthe
thestatement
level of states
I would like to mention and support below mentioned part of of theand governments
Bavarian fell
State Gove
Similar considerations apply No to German municipalities. They are part of the administration of the Germ
La Commission et le Parlement devraient
"The Bavarian facilite
State Yes
Government takes note of the Nofact that, while regional authorities and their repres
of the Transparency Register, No would be blurred if contacts on the level of states and governments fell
Similar considerations apply No to German municipalities. They are part of the administration of the Germ
BASE souhaite que le cad BASE attire lattention Yes Yes
Yes No
No
Yes No
In order to create a leve Yes No
Yes Yes
L'accessibilit par critr Le Registre doit avoir l Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
We encourages the Commission and Parliament Yes to fa No
Yes No
Sivustoa
CALIF pitisi kehitt
encourage niin, ett data-analyysie
la Commission et la ParlementNo faciliter la divulgation de l'identit des membres des structures europenne
CALIF encourage la Commission et la ParlementYes faciliter la divulgation deNol'identit des membres des structures europenne
Yes No
Yes Yes
1. The Joint Transparency Register Secretariat should be given stronger powers to enforce rules arou
Der VCI untersttzt folgende Vorschlge, die der BDI eingebracht hat:
International Standards for Lobbying Regulation recommend an independent, mandated and well-reso
Die Verstndlichkeit der comments,
Angaben
Yes from im
In addition to the above Registerabout
including sollte the
dringend
need forverbessert werden,of
the introduction um a Fehlinterpretatio
legally-binding lo
As the organizations coming a new memberNo state with absolutely no legal framework for lobbying
For citizens to
Additionally, know whoYesisalso
lobbying on which issues,
No it is essential the in
Secretariat actively monitorstaen
Effective dataasmonitoring:
Die Vergleichbarkeit the CSOs
der Daten operating
im Register
The quality in sollte
of the the wider
data in theregion,
dringend lobby especially
gestrkt
register werden. countries
Dazu sind
is extremely withinsbesondere
poor candidate
and Transpareu
As a watchdog organizati No
It is clear that the Register
2. website
The EU has Transparency
undergone Register
Yessignificant
should
changes
require
since
more
No it was
accurate
first launched
and detailed
Accessreporting:
Info strongly
Lobbyrecomm
spendin
Damit Transparenzvorgaben
Improved sanctions to boost Sinn quality
data machen, and mssen sie fr alle
registrations: Organisationen
Submitting inaccurate gleichermaen gelten:
and / or misleading
- The data in the lobby register should be available as open data (reflecting the spirit of EU Communication on Open Data of
Yes No
- A longer list of most recent
3. The registrants.
International Standards require lobbyists and public officials be subject to effective, proportiona
Meetings with registered lobbyists: The Commission's lobby meeting policy should be immediately ext
- Obligatory linking between entries, in particular, Yes where organisations areNo part of coalitions or associations that are also in the
- Greater linking should be Suchmade sanctions
between would Yespublication
proactive
encourage preciseof disclosureNo of data
Commissioner lobbyby meetings
providing andlobbyists
the register
with a disincentive
database.
Include the European Council, Council and permanent representations: The European Council and C
- Greater linking should be made between expert Yes group information and the Noregister database.
4. Given the important role Yesof national PermanentNo Representations in EU decision-making processes,
Changes to the lobby transparency register disclosure requirements: A series of detailed changes are
The new site is a lot eas In line with the Commis Yes No
Financial disclosure: Lobby turnover should be disclosed to the nearest 10,000 euros and not acc
Lobby issue disclosure: No All lobby consultancies and law firms should be required to list, alongside
No
Lobbyists' names disclosure: All individuals lobbying on behalf of a registrant should be listed
The register should be b Disclosure of lobbying Yesthrough third parties: Registrants
Yes should specify all third party organisation
Yes No
No
Yes No
It would be useful if the The extension of the scoYes No
Izvajanje nadzora in sanNo
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
It must be borne in mind that information in the Yes No
Yes Yes
Repsol anima a la Comisin y al Parlamento a que Yes No
Yes No
Unterschiedliche Interpretationen: Nach der let Yes No
Yes No
Centre Maurits Coppieters truly believes in the importance of the Transparency Register and in its role
Yes No
First of all, the non-mandatory nature of the register makes it less effective, particularly with regards to
The Register website is quite
Second, intuitive
the register
and user Yes
should
friendly be for
used
bothto registrants No
highlight whichand visitors.
kinds of However,
interests arethe represented
consultation andshould
havebethe
s
Also, users should have Finally,
the possibility
since theto sort
European No
out registrants
Union has byexpanded
category of itsfunding
scope and and activities,
level of spending
its importance
in lobbying
for lobbying
activities
a
L'ergonomie
Finally, du registre
the European Leconclusion,
dptshould
institutions
In de demande
thedevelop dehandbooks
Yes
d
Transparency Register
of concepts
needs someNothose
for further
whodevelopments
are interest in to bebecome
registered moreor efficient
are alre
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
No
CSE believes that the quality No of the data in the lobby register needs to be substantially improved. Acc
If the Transparency Register is a useful tool, AFA No encourages the European Commission and the European Parliament to mak
In addition, if the availability, the access
In order to improveand this,
the design
Yes are good,
systematic checks it must
on at be
Noborne
least 20%inofmind that information
the declarations must in be
thecarried
Transparenc
out ev
Yes No
In addition to making theNo register mandatory, so as to cover all those that engage in lobbying including
No
Anmerkung
We also support zu EU-Konsultationen:
the proposals of ALTER Eine umfassende
EU on concrete Analyse der Ergebnisse
changes von Konsultationen
to the information required: ist g
Yes No
Financial disclosure: Lobby turnover should be disclosed to the nearest 10,000 euros and not accordi
Un
Lobby registre
issuede
Grundstzlich transpareYes
wre es wnschenswert,
disclosure: All lobby consultancies Yeslaw firms
wenn mglichst
and zeitnah nachbe
should Ende einer to
required Konsultation die the
list, alongside eing
Yes
Lobbyists' names disclosure: All individuals lobbying No on behalf of a registrant should be listed
Aufbau und Struktur des Nicht klar istofbei
Disclosure allen Konsultationen,
lobbying Yes third parties:
through wie dieRegistrants
eingereichten
No Beitrge,
should specifyangegebenen
all third party Daten und Aussa
organisations wh
The quality of data need Yes Yes
Es ist von auen nicht nachvollziehbar, wie die Auswertung der ffentlichen Konsultationen durchgef
The EU Transparency
Anmerkung Register is already
zu EU-Konsultationen: Oftmals a machen
well-developed
wir die one. However,
Erfahrung, dassimprovement
die eingereichten can always
Beitrgb
Aufbau und Struktur des Es ist von auen nicht nachvollziehbar, Yes wie die Auswertung
No der ffentlichen Konsultationen durchgef
In addition to the alreadyYes made comments, the European No Youth Forum calls for:
Yes No
- The Council of the European Union to be covered by the Transparency Regime
- Yes
The introduction of a legislative footprint linked Noto any legislative production (draft texts, amendm
The Transparency Register - website
The EUshould institutions No
followpolitical
the following
representatives
guidelinesand to ensure
high-ranking
its accessibility
officials involved
to everyone:in policy making to
Kategorie VI scheint berdurchschnittlich
- The EU institutions viele political
No representatives and high-ranking officials involved in policy making to
Accessibility guidelines for - UN These
websites:
commitmentsYes from the EU institutions No should be part of a Code of Conduct annexed to an
The user interface is fundamental - Registered
for themeetings
successNo should directly link to the entries of the lobbyists in the Transparency Regist
http://www.un.org/webaccessibility/
-
Die Webseite und ihre Suchfunktionen To ensuresollten that thesobody Yes in charge of the Transparency No Register is fully staffed and with the appro
- Trilogues to be covered by the EU Transparency Regime
Yes No
Introduction to Web Accessibility:
We would recommend the We E fully support Busnin No
All these call and commitments reflect the EU treaties, especially:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php Yes No
- Article 112 TEU: Yes
The institutions
As conceived, the Register website offers great opportunities, with possibilities shall No ansuch
maintain open,as transparent
the search by and regular dialogue
organisations and thewithexr
Source: ENIL - European- Network Articleon 2981
Independent
TFEU:Yes InLiving
carrying out their missions, No the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies o
However, the lack of guidance on how to properlyYes fill the data leads to incoherent Yes data being filled in, impacting the efficiency a
Social Platform is currently in the process of finalising a position paper on 'civil society participation an
The website has been improved a lot since the beYes No
DIGITALEUROPE
Accessibility encourages
is a crucial To add,the
element of EU
we areinstitutions
any website,
a member Yes
forto dCivil information
ofmore Society Europe, No
we referseetotheir
ourseparate
member responseorganisation to the
the public
Europeanconsultati
Disab
Yes No
The register needs to beFinally, improved we ashave around
signed halfaYes
of
joint
theNGOentries
letter
arewith
problematic
Transparency
No according
International
to Transparency
'LobbyistInternational.
for Transparent Lo
No
Yes No
Il serait intressant au No
Yes No
In the Spanish version of the website, in the se Yes No opinion
It would be very helpful to be able to download the Yes information in the register Yesto be able to process it using Excel or similar sof
See attached files refer Yes No
The Inter-Institutional No
Agreement with regards to theleTransparency Register and the Code of Conduct
Le site web du registre devrait intgrer davantage de contenus. Cela aidera dcideur public disposer de la meilleure inform
Yes
Proposition n7 : Refonte dun portail de transparence facile utiliser aux contenus intgrs No
As portail
Le I have dualready stated,
registre It is clear that doit
de transparence the interest Yesof the EU
tre davantage citizens
simple is above
utiliserNo opinion
the interests
et accessible of EU lobbyists.
(user-friendly). Thus, the
Un portail Register
devrait a min
-The Le Registre de Die
transparence
availability of information Information
We believe tel quil
or documents estdarber,
that a dramatic No
actuellement
on the register (a)
overhaul avec
canof belintgration
theimproved
transparency doutils
by adding de
register gestion
more multilingues
is required,
informationin order (b);
from to
other
turndatabases
it into a fu
-LesLesinformations
Positions publiques
concernant desles organisations,
rencontres des des Yes
think-tanks et des dcideurs No publics (proposition n2) ;
- Les
As Consultations
a starter, publiques
the transparency
This de
It is importantla Commission
isregister
why, until
coulda mandatory
to stress europenne
be improved
No register ; is introduced,
to include also the listswe believe
of meetingsit is key
thattohigh-level
use all possible
Commission
incentives
offici
Es stimmt, dassdedas Portal
deEslades
stimmt,
Transparenzregisters
dass das PortalYesdes
- Les Feuilles route Commission europenne mit
; Transparenzregisters
dem Relaunch im Aprilmit2015
demverbessert
Relaunch im wurde.
April Trotzdem
2015 verbessert
mchten wurd
w
No
-There
Les Agendas des
is no informationdcideurs
about
WeMettre publics
accept thequi
the sanctions le souhaitent,
Commission's
placed o
on stance dont
lobbyists linstitution
thatwho dappartenance
a legislative
violate theact terms
remains le requiert
of thea lobby
possible ;
register
next step
on theif the
public
upcoming
websi
J'appartiens une catg1)
Die Suchfunktion solle verbessert
- du
DieParlement und
un niveau
Suchfunktion gNo
sensibilisiert
solle verbessert
- LObservatoire lgislatif europen ; werden.und Z.B. sensibilisiert
ergibt die Suchewerden. nach Z.B.'exxon'
ergibtnur
die zwei
Suche Lobbyfirmen,
nach 'exxon' dienurExx
z
The
Einedisclosure
Liste der of thede
fi The
neuesten -does
100
Eine register should
Registrierungen
Liste der also; Yes Yeshilfreich.
- Les
The Communiqus
search function alsopresse
Improvementsdesallow
not toneuesten
Institutions
forthe wre
ranking
level 100
ofhilfreich.
of Registrierungen
detail
the Die jetzige
various
included wre
Liste
registrations
in the ist
bymit
various 10Die
differentEintrgen
registrationjetzigeareListe
criteria, zu
alsokurz.
e.g. ist mit 10 Eintrgen
spending,
required. These zu sk
even ifinclud
you
- Die
Les Seite
Rseauxmit Neuigkeiten -- Die
ist Seite
sociaux (Facebook,
More nicht zentral
Twitter,
information aboutYes
mit Neuigkeiten
genug
Linkedin);imistPortal.
the nicht
link zentral
between genugNo
Die Registrierten
lobbying imincome/expenditure
Portal.
sollten Dieauf alle
Registrierten
Updates
and the unter
sollten 'Neuigkeiten'
auf alle
decision Updates
or process hinge
b
- Des
We Pages
also thinkdinformation
that more can tierces
- More gres
be details
done toaboutpar the
make les Yes
theorganisations
exact
register data :accessible
amount ofPartenariats, No
expenditure for Alliances,
persons
for example,Evnements,
with hearing,
NGOs readingPositions,
should be etc. difficulties
or required
other to list w
Idalement, le site devrait Legalement
portail de transparen
tre subdivis Yespar grands thmes etNo sous-thmes (par exemple : Dveloppement durabl
All data should be as machine Of course readable
it goes aswithout
possibleYes
saying
to allowthatcivil
the society
European and
Yes Council,
journalistsCouncil
to play andtheir
permanent
watchdogrepresentations
role effectively.s
Comments or suggestions
2.1 Entities
(Optional)
joining th Comments or suggestions
2.2 It(Optional)
is easy to provi

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Too much is asked La excesiva informacin No opinion

No opinion Fully agree


I think the categories ar Too much is asked Partially agree

Fully agree Disagree

Fully agree The requirements for disclosure of financial data go too far. It is unacceptable
No opinion
Experience shows hat the main "consumers" of such data are 1) competitors
Fully agree Fully agree
Should the Commission think that access to such Information is necessary fo
Too much is asked Fully agree
Too much is asked Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Partially agree
Too much is asked No opinion

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Limiter la capacit des l Fully agree

No clear ways to add opiFully agree Fully agree

Too little is asked Source of financial supp Fully agree

Specifically, the phrase "If a company and its advisers are involved as a party
Too little is asked Partially agree
Too little is asked Fully agree

Too little is asked No opinion

Too little is asked The accuracy of the info Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Too little is asked No opinion
No opinion No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion No opinion

Too little is asked Disagree

We observe two main limitations to the current approach:


Too little is asked Disagree
1. Organizations are required to select a single classification, but may themselves be engaged in more than one of these activ
Fully agree The right information is No opinion
2. At present the registerToo muchan
requires is asked
organizationConcerning
to register as
a
entities
single Disagree
classifying
entity with
under
subsidiary
Annex Ientities
SectionandI (as
structure
well as Associatio
loosely ou
Too much is asked Fully agree
We would advise the Commission
Too little istoasked
take a firmerWe
position
wouldonadvise
multi-national
the Commission
Fully
or group
agreetocompany
require entities
entries.falling
In theunder
case aofSection
a singleI r

Too little is asked Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Too little is asked Il registro avrebbe reale Fully agree

Too little is asked No opinion


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Se debera pedir otros r Partially agree

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Too much is asked Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Der Bereich FinanzdatenFully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree
No h nenhum local ond
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion


Too little is asked manque la description deFully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Es ist manchmal umstnToo much is asked Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree Partially agree
Too much is asked Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree Partially agree

Too much is asked On ne demande pas les Fbully agree


Too much is asked Stimme im Prinzip voll Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Partially agree

Too little is asked Il questionario consente Fully agree

Too much is asked Partially agree

Too much is asked Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
we are a multi staekholdeFully agree Disagree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Too little is asked The information providedPartially agree

Too much is asked Partially agree


Fully agree Partially agree

Too little is asked Fully agree

Fully agree Providing information abFully agree

Too little is asked Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Not always that clear in Too much is asked Financial data are redunPartially agree
Too little is asked Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Too much is asked Fully agree


Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Too little is asked Partially agree
Too little is asked Partially agree
Fully agree Partially agree

Too little is asked Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree
Cette division par sectio Too little is asked Partially agree
Too little is asked Fully agree

Too little is asked Det er for let levere inf Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree
As a political party, it i Fully agree Partially agree

Too much is asked Mitgliedschaften ist schwPartially agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree there needs to be many cFully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree

Too little is asked Fully agree

Too little is asked Je mehr die Einrichtung Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Too much is asked Too much information is Partially agree


Fully agree Partially agree

Too little is asked Disagree

Fully agree Fully agree

Too much is asked Partially agree


Too little is asked It should add the companFully agree
Too much is asked Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Limites floues entre les Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree No opinion

Too little is asked Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree Disagree

Too much is asked Fully agree

No opinion No opinion
Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Too little is asked Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Comment cela peut-il etrNo opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree

No opinion No opinion
Too much is asked No opinion

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree No opinion

Maybe the different sect Fully agree No opinion

most categories are to b Too little is asked Partially agree


why do organistaions si Too little is asked again who checks that ? Disagree

Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion Partially agree


Fully agree "Goals of the organisati No opinion
Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


No aparecen los ColegioToo much is asked Partially agree

Too little is asked No opinion


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Too much is asked Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Associations are asked for their turnover, but the large majority of association
Some organisations regisFully agree Associations should therefore
Fully agree
be required to provide their annual budget as w
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Too much is asked Existe informacin de la Partially agree

No opinion No opinion
Fully agree Partially agree

Die Fragestellung ist et Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Too little is asked The data in the Register Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

It should be MANDATORY
Fully agree Fully agree

Too much is asked Partially agree


Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Too little is asked Partially agree


Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

The entities should stat Fully agree No opinion


No opinion Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Too little is asked Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion Broaden the Transparency Partially agree


Register to include internal ethical codes of condu
Fully agree Fully agree
While the Transparency Register has a code of conduct for how all members
What is important to note here is that many organisations not only do not hav
See section in Part A ab Too little is asked Action point: Provide a section
No opinion
in the register for organisations to upload their

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Partially agree

Too much is asked Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree

I'm not in such a organizFully agree No opinion

Fully agree Hvis bare alle vil opgive Fully agree

Too much is asked Partially agree

A series of detailed changes are required


Too little is asked Partially agree to the rules of the lobby register in
Financial disclosure: Lobby turnover should be disclosed to the nearest 10,00
Lobby issue disclosure: All lobby consultancies and law firms should be requi
Lobbyists' names disclosure: All individuals lobbying on behalf of a registrant
There are many organisat
Too little is asked Disclosure of lobbying through
Fully agree
third parties: Registrants should specify all thir

Fully agree Fully agree

Too little is asked Partially agree


We are an organisation sFully agree Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Too much is asked No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree


But the excluded organisToo little is asked No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Too little is asked No opinion


Unklare Vorgaben wie zur Berechnung von Mitgliedsbeitrgen sind zu verme
Too much is asked A series
Die EU-Institutionen Partially
of detailed changes
sollten ein agree toRegister
areintegriertes
required boost data quality:
ber alle mageblichen

Too much is asked Financial disclosure: Currently,


Disagreelobby consultancies and law firms are require

Fully agree Lobby dossier disclosure:Partially


Unfortunately,
agree this area of the register is poorly pol
Fully agree Fully agree
Lobbyists' names disclosure: All names of lobbyists operating on a registrant'

Disclosure of lobbying through third parties: Currently, registrants are required

We note that there are mToo little is asked End think-tank exemption:
Partially
Currently,
agree
think-tanks only provide general funding
Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Corporations aren't mentFully agree Fully agree


Too much is asked Vgl. Bemerkung zu 2.3.. Disagree

We believe the information that is currently required is appropriate. It is of leg


As a trade association, Fully agree Fully agree
Too little is asked financial fourchette is to Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Troch tak, bo nie przewToo much is asked Z jednej strony wymaga sDisagree
Fully agree Fully agree

Mehr unntiger rechtlich Too little is asked Siehe Teil A Nr. 1.1.c Disagree

Fully agree Fully agree


Too little is asked Fully agree

Too little is asked As long as the provided Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion

Too much is asked Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Dennoch: ich bentige HiToo little is asked Es geht - s.o. - um die Partially agree
Too little is asked Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree Partially agree

No opinion No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion No opinion

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Too little is asked No opinion

Too little is asked Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Too little is asked Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Too little is asked Disagree

No opinion Partially agree


Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Too little is asked Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Too little is asked


Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully


Lobbyisten zijn in principe agreeen organisaties met hetzelfde kiesrecht en
mensen
Het is onduidelijk of ge Too little is asked Een mogelijkheid om meer Noover
opinion
hen bekend te laten zijn is door voordat besl
they do it wrong Too little is asked Partially agree
Too much is asked Siehe Bemerkungen zu Disagree

L'UE doit veiller au com Too little is asked Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Too much is asked Partially agree

I would make movementsFully


( agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


No opinion Partially agree

Det er ikke i alle hring Fully agree Fully agree

Die BAK spricht sich insgesamt fr klarere Bezeichnungen der jeweiligen Gruppen und Sub-Gruppen aus, damit weniger Falsc

Als gesetzliche Arbeitnehmervertretung passt die BAK in keine der genannten Kategorien exakt. Die BAK ist zur Zeit in der Su
Fully agree Fully agree
Die BAK schlgt daher vor,
Tooeine
littleeigene
is asked
KategorieDie
fr fr
"Gewerkschaften
Lobbying einges
und
Fully
gesetzliche
agree Arbeitnehmervertretungen" zu schaffe

Fully agree En ce qui concerne les Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree
The category (Trade Unio
Fully agree To request more would hPartially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Too much is asked Wat heeft de financile sFully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Too little is asked should ask for legal stat Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Too little is asked Fully agree

Too much is asked Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Too much is asked Partially agree

Too much is asked Partially agree

Too little is asked Fully agree

from a interest represen Fully agree Fully agree

Too little is asked ECTAA is satisfied with tFully agree


Fully agree It is important to mainta Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Too much is asked Partially agree
Too little is asked Partially agree

Too much is asked There is no need to proviFully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Too much is asked Too much is asked of smal
Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Non ho trovatoi le Associa
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Confusin entre diferent No opinion Partially agree
Too much is asked Kundenliste und FinanzdPartially agree
Fully agree the register is not suita Partially agree
Too little is asked There are not enough opDisagree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Too little is asked Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Too much is asked Partially agree


Fully agree This is the definition of Fully agree

Too little is asked Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Some detailed changes need to be made to the overall rules of the register to
1) Financial disclosure: Lobby spending should be disclosed to the nearest 1
2) Lobbyists' names disclosure: All individuals lobbying on behalf of a registra
3) Disclosure of lobbying through third parties: Registrants should specify all
Using clear titles, acco Too little is asked Fully agree
Too much is asked Partially agree

Too much is asked die finanzielle leistungs Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion No opinion
A series of detailed changes are required to the rules of the lobby register in
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Financial disclosure:Fully
Lobby turnover should be disclosed to the nearest 1
agree
Fully agree No opinion
Lobby issue disclosure: All lobby consultancies and law firms should be
Fully agree Fully agree
No opinion A series of detailed changes are required to ensure that the register presents
No opinion
Lobbyists' names disclosure: All individuals lobbying on behalf of a regis
Too much is asked Disagree
Fully agree Financial disclosure: Currently,
Fully lobby consultancies and law firms are require
agree
Disclosure of lobbying through third parties: Registrants should specify a
There are many organisat
Too little is asked Fully agree
Lobby issue disclosure: Currently all registrants are required to record the ma
My employer is an associa
Fully agree Partially agree
Too little is asked The information providedFully Ifagree
Lobbyists' names disclosure: the names of all individuals lobbying on behal
CEO has found amongstFully agreeanomalies and data inaccuracies in thePartially
the many register,agree
that a high number of general consultancy
Too little is asked Disclosure of lobbying through
Fully agree
third parties: Registrants should specify all thir

Fully agree Fully agree


No opinion No opinion
Too much is asked Finantial data required i Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


I missed the registratio Too much is asked Partially agree
A series of detailed changes
BUSINESSEUROPE is in favourare required
of furthertoimproving
the rules the
of the lobby register
reliability, validity in
an
data quality and to ensure that the register presents a reliable picture of lobby
level. At the moment
For instance, much of theoffer
trade associations dataaislarge
too poor to be
variety of use. Asforarticulated
of activities their mem
question 4 the following changes are recommended:
Financial
In disclosure: Lobby
addition, membership turnover
fees would be should
referredbetodisclosed
twice astocosts
the nearest
of membe 10
euros and not according to wide or open-ended brackets. Lobby spending sh
be disclosed
However, to the
as we fullynearest
support10,000 euros.
the Commissions aim of shedding light on thos
Lobby issue disclosure: All lobby consultancies and law firms should be req
list, alongside
1. In the future,the allspecific lobby should
registrants revenue bereceived
asked tofrom eachaclient,
provide the precis
list of maximum
There are many organisations which have categorised issues
2. themselves
upon whichfees
Membership wrongly.
they(orlobby
aSome andof/ or
these
proportionaladvise each client.
calculation) should only be included
could be easily dealt with by using clearer titles and Lobbyists'
descriptions names
isforfinanced
the
disclosure:
different All individuals lobbying on behalf of a registra
agree to indicate 3. ..an entity by more
Der Deutsche
categories andVerein fr Fullyexamples
by providing be
how listed Fully
certain kinds of organisations agreethan 30% by a single registrant.
Fully agree
should categorise themselves. For example, professional
Disclosure consultancies
of lobbying Fully
should
through agree
be third
renamed
parties: Registrants should specify all t
as 'lobby
The consultancies'
classification to make
does not convey it clear
to thethat other
wider party
kinds
public
Thus, organisations
the offact
an consultancies
entity
that thewhich
which should
European
has itonly
pays through
very
Social which are
fewPartners
members, it conducts
and
distinct
where its one
from lobbying
other
(or twoand
orin
interes t
register in other categories.
Too little is asked how much it pays to them. Partially agree
The representativeness of Too
Social
muchPartners
is askedis fullyThis
documented,
would be regularly
easy to understand
researched
Disagree and andinreviewed
line with by
existing
the European
principlesCommissi
in the co

Insbesondere bei global aufgestellten groen Unternehmen ist die Aktualisier


Too much is asked Partially agree
Too much is asked Unklare Vorgaben wie zurPartially agree von Mitgliedsbeitrgen sind zu verme
Berechnung

Too much is asked Die EU-Institutionen sollten


Disagree
ein integriertes Register ber alle mageblichen
Too much is asked Partially agree

Too much is asked Partially agree


Too much is asked Partially agree
Too much is asked Partially agree

Too much is asked Die Offenlegung von FinPartially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Partially agree

Lobbying firms should beFully


m agree Fully agree
Fully agree It is important to have Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Organisations especiallyFully agree Partially agree

It is difficult to make Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Subject of the particular Fully agree

Too little is asked Fully agree


Fully agree It would be convenient toPartially agree
Too little is asked Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Too much is asked Financial data publicati Partially agree


Especially for globally positioned large enterprises the update of the data in t

Unclear requirements as for the calculation of membership fees should be av


Fully agree Fully agree
Our association is non-pFully agree For bigger umbrella orgaPartially
The EU institutions should provide agree
an integrated register of all relevant EU st
Too much is asked Disagree
Some of the organisationToo little is asked The registration system Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree No opinion

Too much is asked Disagree

Fully agree Fully


All lobby consultancies and lawagree
firms should be required to list, alongside the
Fully agree Regarding the financial i Fully agree
"Trade unions and profesToo little is asked Registrants should specify
La difficult majeure Fully
rside all
dansagree
third
laparty organisations
mthode which
de calcul des it pays
cots through
et du "temps
Seule une mthodologie claire et applicable toutes les parties prenantes pe
No opinion No opinion
Il est important que soit vit tout double comptage.
Fully agree Afin d'viter toutes surcharges
Partially
administratives,
agree nous soutenons donc pleinem

Fully agree Il faudrait pouvoir affi Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Too much is asked Die erforderliche Aktual Disagree

No opinion Partially agree

Fully agree Please note that some typ


Partially agree
this classification has Fully agree Fully agree
No opinion Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


We appreciate the way in which Section V (Organisations representing Churches and religious communities) is devised. Its h
Fully agree Partially agree
A quotation from paragraph
Fully
13agree
of the relevant 2014
Theinterinstitutional
level of disclosure
agreement
c Fully agree
(The register does not apply to churches and
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree Partially agree
through the revolving door. Lobby organisations that employ former MEPs, C

officials should provide that information as part of their entries on the register

public to monitor potential conflicts of interest.

- an option for registrants to upload documents such as policy papers or lette


Fully agree Partially agree
the EU institutions

The
The EU
scope institutions
and qualitythemselves
of thetoinformationcould alsothat provide additional
lobbyists information
are required or lin
DI welcomes further efforts create transparency of disclosed datato(e.g.disclos
cos
Too much is asked For
There large
shouldmultinationals
also be more Disagree
guidance for registrants. The introduction of autom
DI strongly advocates a register that lists the most important EU membership
Fully agree information to the entriesFully on the register:
agree
The approach is easy to understand and balances the Commissions intentio
Nous sommes une organisa Fully agree en complment
Recommendations
Another issue ofd'un concern codPartially
is the listing agreeof EU structures monitored by the orga
Fully agree - entries should be automatically Partially linked to information on grants received, the
Finally, some members of DI haveagree expressed concerns about art. 13 i.e. fund
Too much is asked In a reformed Register, Transparency Disagree International would like to see additiona
groups,
-The up-to-date the high-level
financial meetings with
information. the European Commission, contributions
Fully agree Federation of Enterprises Fully agree is inAllfavour
financial information
of further improvingon the theRegister
reliability,is cv
- information on revolving door cases. Entries should provide information on s
Fully agree -- information Partially agree
Section 2.2. specifically, and in our view entirely inappropriately For option foron
an instance, trade
which organisations
registrants to
associations
recognises thatupload offer
Regional
have beensuch
documents
a largepublic
suspended
variety of
authorities
or deregistered.
asactivities
policy
andpapers for their
their or lette
mem
represen
T
Der GDV bekennt sich grundstzlich zu
The EU institutions themselves could also provide additional information or lin Transparenz. Die zu Grunde liegende
The categories provided No by the
opinionRegister are generally We believe
accountability. good. thatAs too
However, much
it automatically
stands, isitasked
Transparency
Fully isagree and
impossible atolot
International toofsee
thewhoinformation
hasgrants
been asked from the
sanctioned. reg
For that reason we specifically request that the IIA - entries
In addition,
on should
the Transparency be
membership fees would
Register linked
and be
thereferred information
Guidelines to twice on as costs
specifically received,
say of
that:membe
The categories provided Too much
by the is asked
Register are generally-Beispiele
information
good. und Argumente
However,
on Partially
whichTransparencyhierzu siehe
organisations agree A1.2.
International
have been suspended
has observed or deregistered.
that a numbeT
has observed thatIIAa itnumber of organisations First,
categorise
There asking
should registrants
themselves also bewrongly.
moreto disclose
emphasis their on goals
ensuringand thethe required
remit of their organisat
information is
As part of a new should
Too little
be considered
is asked to
Representations of national, regional and local governments clearlyThere
Whilst
On separate
theweshould
otheragree also
corporate
hand,
and thatbe
theirwe more
the from
Fully
right
fully emphasis
non-commercial
agree
type of
support
associations the on ensuring
information
should interests
the
not fallisunder
Commissions required
by
required
approachmoving
the EU from information
the
shed subsec
toregistrants,
transparency is
light
Wepart
appreciate that Fully agree As
Leaving mentionedaside before,
that we the Fully
CCBE
fundamentally agreebelievesdisagree that the
withspecificities
theincluding
expectation ofeveryone
certain profe
that public
As of a new IIAthe Registers
it should scope extends
be considered to clearlySecondly,
be
A
to consultancy
automatic
separate
series
asking lobbyists
alerts registrants
corporate
of future,
detailed if fields as
from well
aretonon-commercial
arenot
estimate
as in-house
completed the percentage
lobbyists
with the their staff
thatnecessary
spends
diligence. from
onF
To COSLA and our membership Too much thisis distinction
asked 1.
The
plainly Inmakes
the
breath and allchanges
detail
no sense registrants
of
asPartially
the financial
a region required
should
agree
is no be to
information
less ensure
asked to provide
required the
of a democratically toaregister
be presents
listdisclosed
of maximum
elected tierbea
o
We believe that the Too much
transparency is asked
register should 2. Even
Finally,
level Membership
when
thewe data
playing
have fees
is
also
field (orDisagree
possible adistinguishing
previously
and proportional
to be provided
discussed calculation)
the design
organisations
how the should
and
disclosure
on the only
underlying be included
register
of financialassum
in such
dat
interests by moving the subsection Trade Unionsdescription and Professional
Recommendations of activitiesAssociations
and legislative either into files itsfollowed could be standardised wi
Too much is asked 3. an entity is financed No by opinionmore than 30% by a single registrant.
The
scope
Financial anddisclosure:
quality of the Lobby information
turnover that shouldlobbyists are required
be disclosed to theto disclos1
nearest
own category or integrating Tooitlittle
into isIII.
asked
Non-Governmental with
There
Thus,Lobby allshould
ongoing
organisations.
issue legislative
also be more
disclosure: Fullyfiles. agree
guidance
All lobby for registrants.
consultancies The
and introduction
law firms of
should autom
be
an entity which has only very few members, and where one (or two or t
categories provided
The classification does notbyconvey
the Registerto theare generally
wider public Recommendations
A series Lobbyists'
good.
the fact However
thatnames
the Oxfam
disclosure:
European has observed
All
Social individuals
Partners that a lobbying
number
are distinct on
of organisations
behalf
from of
other a regis
cat
interes
of detailed changes are required to boost data quality:
In
This a reformed
Financial Disclosure be Register,
woulddisclosure: of lobbying
easy Transparency
toCurrently, through
understand andthirdInternational
in parties:
line with would
Registrants
existing like to
should
principlessee additiona
specify
in the coa
lobby consultancies and law firms are require
We suggest
The to clearly separate
representativeness Too
of little
Social corporate
is asked from
Partners is fully -the
non-commercial up-to-date
documented,
serious financial
interests
problems
regularly information.
the by
Fullymoving
researched agree
overwhelming All
the financial
and subsection
majority
reviewed information
ofTrade
by on
Unions
associations
the the
European Register
and
and Profess
Commissi
compan is c
Lobby dossier disclosure: Unfortunately, this area of the register is poorly pol
-Lobbyists'
information on revolving door Allcases.
namesEntries
Too much is asked Disagree shouldoperating
provide information on s
names disclosure: of lobbyists on a registrant'
-Disclosure
an option of forlobbying
registrants to upload documents such as policy papers or lette
through third parties: Currently, registrants are required
The
End EU institutions themselves could also provide additional
provide information or lin
We note that there are mToo little is asked think-tank exemption: Partially
Currently, agree think-tanks only general funding
- entries should be automatically linked to information on grants received, the
The categories provided Too littleRegister
by the is askedare generally - information
good. However,
on whichTransparencyFully agree International
organisations have been suspended has observed or deregistered.
that a numbeT
As part of a new IIA it should Fullybeagreeconsidered to clearly Thereseparate
should also corporate
be more Fully
from agree on ensuring
emphasis
non-commercial interests
the required
by moving information
the subsec is

Too little is asked Fully agree


Angesichts der speziellen Rolle, die den Europischen Sozialpartnern vonPartially
Fully agree agree eingerumt wird, ist es erstaunlich, d
den Vertrgen
Der
internationale NGOs mit ECOSOC Status in der UNO und als Partnerorganisationagree
Begriff "NGO" sollte Fully
definiert
agreeund ihre Finanzierungsquellen
..., aber es scheint
offengelegt
kei Partially
werden, inso
derwie einige Organisationen haben
EU-Grundrechteagentur dies von an
einen
Zum Beispiel hat die international
Fully agree ttige NGO-Organisation Verein zur Frderung
Fully agree
der Vlkerverstndigung (Society for the Adv
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Disagree
Fully agree Partially agree
The information currently required is more than sufficient and its scope shoul
We also think that the existing provision of information on costs and revenue
No opinion No opinioncan be calculated differently, its inclusion m
Moreover, as financial information
Fully agree When considering the type Fully
of agree
information to be reported, it should be kept in
In addition, we do not think that it is crucial that information on costs should b
Too much is asked Finally, it should be easier
Partially
for newagree
organisations (including also those organis
Fully agree Fully agree
Unklare Vorgaben wie zur Berechnung von Mitgliedsbeitrgen sind zu verme
No opinion Partially agree
Too much is asked Die EU-Institutionen sollten
Disagree
ein integriertes Register ber alle mageblichen
Too much is asked Unklare Vorgaben wie zur Disagree

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree The information requestePartially agree


The scope
The listed categories and their replication in this survey seemand qualityAof
to differ. the information
separation that lobbyists
of associations are required
as follows to disclos
would help:
Associations mostly representing commercial members There should also be more guidance for registrants. The introduction of autom
Associations mostly representing non-commercialRecommendations
members
Associations representing a profession In a reformed Register, Transparency International would like to see additiona
Trade Unions - up-to-date financial information. All financial information on the Register is c
Fully agree -Forinformation
practicality ontherevolving door cases.
poli Partially agreeEntries should provide information on s
- an option for registrants to upload documents such as policy papers or lette
The EU institutions themselves could also provide additional information or lin
Fully agree - entries should be automatically Fully agree linked to information on grants received, the
Fully agree -Insbesondere
information on which Fully agree have been suspended or deregistered. T
organisations
bei global aufgestellten groen Unternehmen ist die Aktualisier
The categories provided Too littleRegister
by the is askedare generally
Registrants
There good.
should should
However,
Transparenzregister
Not only also be
information
also
mit
about
beinem
Fully
Transparency
more the
agree
emphasis International
on
erheblichen
past 12 ensuring
months has
theobserved
required
brokratischen
should Aufwand
be required, information
thatbut
averbunde
numbe
alsoisin
As part of a new IIA it should
Too little
be considered
is asked to clearly
knnten
Lobby separate
dazu corporate
beitragen,
spending should from
Fully
den non-commercial
agree
brokratischen
be disclosed interests
Aufwand
to thebedeutet zu
nearest 10,000 by moving
begrenzen
euros. the subsec
und Tran
Fr multinational agierende Unternehmen die stetige Aktualisierung
Fully agree The reliability, validity and transparency
Partially agree of costs for EU interest
All lobby consultancies and law firms should be required to list, alongside the representatio
Unklare
All
Unklare Vorgaben
individuals
Vorgaben wie
wie zur
lobbying on Berechnung
z.B. behalf von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
of a registrant
zur Berechnung von should be listedsind sind
Mitgliedsbeitrgen zu verme
zu ve
Too little is asked For example,should
Mitgliedsbeitrgen
Registrants trademssen
associations
specifyPartially
all offer
Organisationen
third
agree a large
party variety
unter of which
hohem
organisations activities for their
brokratischem
it pays mem
Aufw
through
Insbesondere
einholen, die bei global
nicht aufgestellten
verifizierbar sind. groen Unternehmen
Mitgliedsbeitrge sollten istdaher
die Aktualisier
nur dann
Too much is asked Die EU-Institutionen sollten Disagree
darber hinaus eine Transparenz-Plattform fr al
Membership
einzelne fees are
Mitglieder zualso
einem referred twice, both as costs
weit berwiegenden Anteilof members
zur Finanzierungand asderc
Too little is asked De manire
Unklare gnrale
Vorgaben wiecezurFully
s Berechnung
agree von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
die in den Aufgabenbereich des Transparenzregisters fallen. sind zu verme
Fully agree The Confederation
The information required Partially
of Finnish agree EK is a member of BUSINESSEURO
Industries
Too much is asked Die
1. InEU-Institutionen
the future, all sollten
Disagree
registrants ein integriertes
should
Die EU-Institutionen sollten ein integriertes be askedRegister ber
ber alle
to provide
Register a listmageblichen
alle of maximum 5
mageblichen
The classification shouldToo much is asked 2. Membership
fr die Europische fees Kommission,
shouldDisagree
only be dasincluded in the annual
Europische Parlamentcostundestimate,
sonstigeif an
E
Too much is asked stellen und direkt mit dem Disagree
Transparenzregister verknpfen.
Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
The scope and quality of the information that lobbyists are required to disclos
There should also be more guidance for registrants. The introduction of autom
Too much is asked Recommendations
Besonders der Kostenasp Disagree
Fully agree A
In series of detailed
a reformed changes
Register, Fullyare
Transparency
agreerequired to the rules
International of the
would likelobby
to see register in
additiona
- up-to-date financial information. All financial information on the Register is c
- information
Financialon disclosure:
revolving Lobby turnover
door cases. should
Entries be disclosed
should to the nearest
provide information on s1
- an option
Lobby forissue disclosure:
registrants All lobby
to upload consultancies
documents suchand law firms
as policy should
papers be
or lette
Fully agree The

The last
EU changenames
Lobbyists' to the
institutions FPartiallycould
disclosure:
themselves agree
All individuals
also provide lobbying on behalf
additional of a regis
information or lin
- entries
Disclosure
should ofbelobbying through
automatically thirdtoparties:
linked Registrants
information on grants should specify
received, a
the
There are many organisat Too little is asked
The categories provided by the Register are generally - information
good. However, Fully
on whichTransparency agree
organisationsInternational
have been suspended
has observed or deregistered.
that a numbeT
As part of a new IIA it should
Too little
be considered
is asked to clearly
Thereseparate
should also
corporate
be morefrom
Fully
emphasis
non-commercial
agree on ensuring interests
the required
by moving information
the subsecis
Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

La dlimitation entre ce Fully agree Les informations sont app No opinion


The scope and quality of the information that lobbyists are required to disclos
There should also be more guidance for registrants. The introduction of autom
In particular for international corporations it takes a tremendous bureaucratic
Recommendations
In a reformed
Unclear Register,
rules for Transparency
calculation International
of membership wouldbe
fees should like to see additiona
avoided. In order
Too little is asked Fully agree
- up-to-date financial information. All financial information on the Register is c
Too much is asked -EUdetailed, complete
institutions shouldand up-to-date
establish
Disagree informationregister
an integrated on financing sources
covering for theEU
all relevant e
Fully agree - information on revolvingFullydooragree
cases. Entries should provide information on s
- an option for registrants to upload documents such as policy papers or lette

The EU institutions themselves could also provide additional information or lin


- entries should be automatically linked to information on grants received, the
The categories provided Fully
by theagree
Register are generally
- information
good. However, Partially agree
on whichTransparency
organisations International
have been suspended
has observed
or deregistered.
that a numbeT

As part of a new IIA it should


Too little
be considered
is asked to clearly
Thereseparate
should also
corporate
be more
from
Fully
emphasis
non-commercial
agree on ensuring
interests
the required
by moving
information
the subsec
is
not relate to EU interest representation.

In addition, membership fees would be referred to twice as costs of membe


and as costs of associations (double counting). This creates a misleading
picture
Eine Reihe and vonthreatens the quality
detaillierten and reputation
nderungen of the register.
der Regelungen We
des Registers sind
therefore
1) Finanzielle Angaben: Momentan mssen Lobbyberatungen undthe
strongly recommend excluding membership costs from estimate
Anwaltska
annual lobby costs.
Insbesondere bei global aufgestellten groen Unternehmen ist die Aktualisier
Fully agree Lobby turnover brackets Partially
should agree
be made smaller to theMomentannearest 10000 euros
2) Angaben zu Lobbyarbeit durch Drittorganisationen: mssen die
Fully agree Le Groupe
However,
Lobby and as Socit
lawwe firms Gnral
fully Partially
support
should bethe agree
Commissions
required to list aim
the of
issues
Unklare Vorgaben wie zur Berechnung von Mitgliedsbeitrgen sind zu verme shedding
they light
lobby on
on, thosh
and
Too little is asked registered
A
3)registrant entities
Kein Ausschlussmust be which might
obliged
von Fully
Think not
toagree beMomentan
inform
Tanks: clear
of theenough
use ist in their
of third
jede partstructures,
for lobbying.
Organisation, aims
die als
Too much is asked and financing, we propose
Die EU-Institutionen sollten the
einfollowing,
Disagree onRegister
integriertes the basisberof the
alleproposal of BUS
mageblichen
Wir mchten jedoch darau Too little is asked 1. In the future, all registrants should
Partially agreebe asked to provide a list of
maximum 5 direct memberships in entities that are on the register.
2. Membership fees (or a proportional calculation) should only be
There should be a way toFully agree included in the annual cost Fully agree if
estimate,
Too little is asked Trade
3. ..an entity is financed by more agree
association should Partially than 30% by a single registrant.
Fully
The classification does not agreeto the wider public
convey Thus,the anfactentity
thatwhich hasFully
the Europeanonlyagree
very fewPartners
Social members, areand where
distinct fromone (or two
other or
interes
European Social Partners
The representativeness of
Tooare distinct
Social
much from is
Partners
is asked other
fullyinterest
three) registrants
documented,representatives.
finance
regularly it in a proportion
researched
Partially agree above 30%,
and reviewed by thewould
Europeanbe considered
Commissi
They are playing an institutional role, and are sometimes
an exception integralto the
partnormal
of the situation, and additional transparency on its
legislative process, in accordance
Fully agree with a procedurefinancing
foreseen would
in thehave
EU to be provided.
Partially agree
Treaties. This would be easy to understand and in line with existing principles in the
Fully agree Fully agree
The representativeness of Social Partners is fullycompetition
documented, field.
regularly
We believe this rule would be workable and bring a fair
Iresearched
think the categories a Fully
and reviewed agree
by the European Commission.To me the
solution to information
The the
sameproblems
shouldthaNo
beopinion
encountered
done by so many registrants. It would avoid
Fully agree
for any organisation claiming to defend wider collective
the serious
interests,
problems
including Fully agree
the overwhelming majority of associations and compan
NGOs. Fully agree The
haveunderlying
encountered provisionPartially
with the existing agree
requirements on this point, including
Too much is asked compliance issues, whilstDisagree at the same time tackling the issue of transparency
However, some of AmCham Fully agree AmCham EU fully agreesPartially t agree
The Guidelines that are Fully agree Fully agree
Too little is asked The transparency registePartially agree
Fully agree Partially agree
Too much is asked Financial data is often i Partially agree
Too much is asked For large multinational Disagree
Fully agree le calcul des cots et du Partially agree
Too much is asked Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Die Eintragung in das Register und damit die "Offenlegung von Daten und Qu
Too much is asked No opinion

Fully agree Confindustria is in favourPartially


of further improving the reliability, validity and transp
agree
BASE est une association franaise fonde en 2006, For dont les champs de rflexionoffer et dchange sont :oflaactivities
promotion, la comp
1. It instance, trade to
is not relevant associations
force registrantsatolarge variety
submit the fees for lobby foractivities
their mem o
BASE dfend un lobbying dexpertise, sur le modle de celui pratiqu Bruxelles et dans les pays anglo-saxons, qui respecte
Le choix entre associationTooquimuch
est notre
is asked
forme juridique
BASE
In et
regrette
groupeque de les
rflexion
inDisagree
feesqui est be
notre mission
to ncessiterait uneofexplicatio
At addition,
the samemembership
time, this simplified would referred
requirement would twice asany
prevent costs membe
distorted inte
Fully agree Fully agree
However,
2. The amount as weoffully support
people the Commissions
involved, the respectiveaim of shedding
percentage andlight
the on
FTE thos
ne
Fully agree Fully agree
Too much is asked 1
3.-In Interms
the future, all registrants
of information Partiallyshould
to provide, itbe
agree asked
might be to provide atolist
envisaged of maximum
request all the e
2 - Membership fees (or a proportional calculation) should only be included i
Es wre begrenswert
Agissant pour notre part eTen
ooqualit
much is asked nousDie
d'avocat, abgefragten
pouvons soulignerInformat
que Nleso opinion
avocats constituent une catgorie clairement ide
3 - ...an entity is financed by more than 30% by a single registrant.
Cela tant, les entits recenses
Too little is
parasked
le Registre de
L'inscription
la transparence
au Registrne sont Fullypasagree
distingus entre eux par un critre rationnel. l
Fully agree Aportar
Thus, anjustificacin
entity whichdehasFully onlyagree
very few members, and where one (or two or t
Fully agree Fully agree
Too much is asked This wouldthere
Currently be easy to understand
is very Disagree
little and
structure in line with
provided when existing principles
registrants have into the co
share
Too little is asked A list of names of all the Fully individuals
agreelobbying on behalf of a registrant should
La difficult majeure rside dans la mthode de calcul des cots et du "temps
Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree La difficult majeure rs Partially agree
Fully agree Partially agree
Die gewissenhafte Erhebung und regelmige Aktualisierung der Information

Es ist eingehend zu prfen, ob die erhobenen Informationen wirklich einen M


The International Standards for Lobbying Regulation require that lobby regist
Zum Beispiel sind Verbnde und Unternehmen mitunter Mitglied in einer Viel
Aus Sicht der IV muss eine Reform des EU-Transparenzregisters Transparen
Fully agree Whilst
Um diethe current register
Verstndlichkeit Partially
der already agree
Angabenincludes much of this information, thedie
data
Seitens der EU-Insitutionen knnte einimintegriertes
Register zuRegister
verbessern,
ber sollte
MitgliedschRe
Fully agree Im Registerund
Strukturen mussPlattformenFully agree
derzeit angegeben
zur Verfgungwerden, wie werden,
gestellt viele Personen zu wie viel
um Verwaltungsla
Currently all registrants
Weiters sind are required
unklare Angaben, wie dieto zur
record the main EU
Berechnung von initiatives, policies
Mitgliedsbeitrge
Too much is asked Disagree
Von einer Erhhung der geforderten Aktualisierungsfrequenz sollte abgesehe
Entries in the EU Transparency Register should disclose the names of all lob
Too much is asked Disagree
Fully
Whilst there is no problem withagree
the categories perEntries
se, theinJoint
the register
Transparency Partially
should agree
Register
specify all
Secretariat
third partyshould
organisations
ensure that
paidentries
(via me
a
Fully agree We find that this informaPartially agree
Fully agree
The Joint Transparency Register Secretariat should
Think-tanks
also offershould
more precise Partially
disclose agree
descriptions
all their funding
for the
sources,
differentnotcategories
only whether
and provid
the fun
A series of detailed changes are required to the rules of the lobby register in
Too little is asked Fully agree
Too much is asked We
agree withdisclosure:
Financial providing Partially
t Lobby turnover
agree should be disclosed to the nearest 1
Lobby issue disclosure: All lobby consultancies and law firms should be
Lobbyists' names disclosure: All individuals lobbying on behalf of a regis
There are many organisat
Too little is asked Disclosure of lobbying
Partially
throughagree
third parties: Registrants should specify a
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


No opinion Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


We think the right questions are asked regarding goal and remit, as well as re
Fully agree In our advocacy work, weFully alsoagree
have campaigns that are not necessarily linke
No opinion A significant amount of Disagree
Too much is asked Publishing the
Regarding financial
fieldsdata Partiallythere
of interest, agree shouldvalidez
be opportunities to prioritise
Repsol est a favor de mejorar la fiabilidad, y transparencia de lostocop
We have not encounteredFully
a agree Partially agree
Too much
We note that an organisation is asked
can only register asInsurance
oneclaro
Un Europe
typeejemplo
of is el
lobbying
es full
dePartially
entity,
loseven agree
though
gastos its activitiesen
de membresa may
las include a number
asociaciones, queo
Fully agree Whle we provide all the iPartially agree
Too much is asked Asimismo, entendemos que Disagree
no pueden ser incluidos como actividades de lob
Fully agree Fully agree
Too much is asked Insbesondere die EinbeziPartially agree
Fully agree FEDMA considers the curPartially agree
Fully agree FEDMA considers the curPartially agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Il serait intressant de Partially agree


The categorisation is quiFully agree The information includedPartially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree AFA is fully committed t Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree

The way questions are formulated and even the guidelines encourage in prac
Fully agree Fully agree
Il n'est pas prvu de rub Fully agree Le
TheCNB a t
Der derzeitige amen
questions Umfang
on humancons
Partially
an agree
Daten sollte
resources nicht noch
dedicated weiter ausgebaut
to lobbying werden.
does not allow to aD
Fully agree We consider the Transpar Partially agree
Too much is asked Im Vordergrund
Furthermore we des Registers
believe Partially
that sollte
the agree
die in
entries Schaffung voncould
the register Transparenz undused
be usefully Nac
The category NGO is tooToo little is asked Partially agree
We agree that the right type of information is required from registrants to the
Der derzeitige Umfang an Daten sollte nicht noch weiter ausgebaut werden. D
Too much is asked Imaddition,
In Vordergrund des Registers
whereas Partially
details aresollte
agree
die Schaffung
published von Transparenz
of those individuals und an
who have Naca
Too much is asked Der derzeitige Umfang aPartially agree
Fully agree Finally, we question the relevance
Partially agree
of the requirement for consultancies to pro
Fully agree Information on grants anPartially agree

Too much is asked Insbesondere die AufschlDisagree

Too little is asked Organisationen mit mehrFully agree


Fully agree La FBF dclare part saPartially agree

Fully agree Zustzlich zu den Ausgaben Partially agree Lobbying sollte auch angegeben we
fr eigenes
Too little is asked LobbyistInnen
Considering their specific role in the EU decision-making
We believe sollten
process,
that the
socialnicht
Fully
details nuragree
partners ihre
requested KlientInnen
should offenlegen, sondern ausweise
While DIGITALEUROPE believes that are
beunbalanced.
the included
right type ofin a
Thespecific
Transparency
information section, whic
Reg
is currently
Fully agree Though the Register alreFully agree
Also, the current divisionToo
in 5much
sections
is asked
and 15 mutually
We
We believe
wishexclusive
that subsections
forthat
to stress advocates
Disagree
trade is of
complex
transparency,
associations tooffer
handle,
aknowing
bothvariety
wide for
theregistered
issues on organis
which
of services to tha
Fully agree The information requiredPartially agree
Fully agree However,
More we do support
information should Partially
the Commissions
be asked agree goal to
with regards of NGOs
increasing transparency
resources, fo
to clarify
Fully agree Partially agree
Too little is asked The information about NGOs Partially
areas
agree
of work and fields of interest must be des

Too much is asked Le informazioni andrebbePartially agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Experiences have shownToo
t little is asked In order to ensure an eff No opinion
Fully agree Partially agree
Eine Reihe von
Les cabinets de detaillierten
consultancenderungen derjuridiques
et les cabinets Regelungen des Registers
devraient sind
tre obligs
Too little is asked A list of potential
- les noms des clientsor re Fully agree
Too little is asked As
- lesI have
sujetsstated
Finanzielle earlier,
Angaben:
par rapport Fully agree
Momentan
auxquels mssen
ils Lobbyberatungen und Anwaltskanz
sont actifs
- les montants de leurs honoraires
Too little is asked Angaben zu Lobbyzielen:
en particulier Momentan
concernantFully
leursagree sind
activits dealle Akteure dazu verpflichtet, anzu
lobbying.

Namentliche Angaben: Momentan


Fully agree Fully agreemssen im EU-Transparenzregister keine
Angaben
Comments zuabout
Lobbyarbeit
the datadurch Drittorganisationen:
provided have already beenMomentan mssen
made above die A
(includin
Branch organisations of Too little is asked Much more details are nee Partially agree
Too little is asked This
A fewisadditional
difficult - becau
Finanzierungsquellen von
comments:NoThink
opinion
Tanks: Momentan mssen Organisationen, d
Wir mchten jedoch daraToo little is asked Auch sollten alle Akteure Partially
zum Zweck
More information about the individual agreederr Vergleichbarkeit
lobbyists die finanziellen
working in Brussels An
is require
Fully agree Partially agree
There is evidence that s Too little is asked Entries should be updated Partially
more regularly:
agree either after any major changes occ
Comments or suggestions
2.3 Do
(Optional)
you see any rooComments or suggestions
2.4 What
(Optional)
is your impres

No opinion Good

Yes Average
No opinion Good

Yes Hay que limitar la infor Average

No No opinion
No opinion Average

Can't even search contenNo opinion Poor

No Good

No opinion Good
Yes Good
Yes Removal of the financial Good

No opinion Good
No Good
No opinion No opinion

Yes Good

No Good

No Average

No Average

No opinion Good
Yes mehr Abfragen zur vorhaAverage

No opinion Average

Yes See answer to question 2Average

No Good
No opinion Average
No Average

No opinion Good

No opinion No opinion

No Poor

No opinion Poor
No Poor
Yes Average
No No opinion
No opinion Good

No Poor
No Good

No opinion Average

Yes Good
No Good
No Poor

No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion
Yes Good

Yes Average
No Average
Yes Good
Yes Good
Yes Good
No Good
No Good

No opinion Average
No Good
No opinion Good

No Average
Yes Good

No Good

No Good
Yes Good

No opinion Good

Yes Average
No opinion Good
No Good
No Good
Yes Average
Yes O Registo deve ser autoGood
No opinion Average

No opinion Good
facile oui, souhait et ef No Protger les donnes indi
Poor
No opinion Average

No No opinion
Yes Average

No opinion Good
No Good
No Good

No No opinion
No opinion Good
Yes Good
No Average
No opinion Good
No Good

No Average

Yes Good
No opinion Good
No opinion Good
No opinion Good

No Good

No opinion Average

Yes Good
No opinion Good

No Certaines donnes "sensi


Average
No Good

Yes Average
certain information requeNo opinion Average

No Good

Yes Average

Yes Good

Yes Average
No opinion Average
No Average
No Average

No Good
No Average
No opinion Average
No Average
No Poor

Yes Good
No opinion Average

No Average

Yes Multiple selection (tick Good

Yes Poor

No opinion No opinion
see above re budgets Yes Avoid redundancy with otAverage
No Average
No Good

Yes Good
calculation of the financ Yes financial aspects Average

Yes Average
Yes Poor
Yes Poor
Yes An easier-to-fill-in form Good

Yes Average
No Good

Yes Average
No Average
No opinion Average
Problmes lis la bure Yes Average
No opinion Poor

No Man skal ikke g p komPoor


Yes Good
No Average
No opinion Good
Yes Average
No Average

No opinion Average

No Good
No Average
No opinion Poor
No Good
Les catgories demandes
Yes en ayant des termes plusNo opinion

No opinion Average

No opinion No opinion

No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good

Yes Si con previa audiencia Average

Yes Good
No Good

I've only found the surveYes Average

No opinion Good

Yes Average
No Average
Yes Average

Yes Average

No opinion Good

No Average
L'information "nombre deNo
l opinion Poor

Yes an electronic platform b Average


Yes Average
No opinion Average

Yes Good

No Average
Yes Good

Yes Average

No opinion No opinion
No opinion Average

No Good

No Average
No Good

No Average

No opinion Good

No Good

No opinion Poor

Yes Good

No Good

No opinion No opinion
Yes Average

No Good

No opinion Average

No opinion Good

No opinion No opinion

No opinion Average

No Poor
it shouldnt be easy for No again there shouldnt be No opinion

No Average

No opinion Poor
No opinion No opinion
No opinion Average
Yes It should be easier to seeGood

No opinion Average

No opinion Good

Yes Good
Yes Good

No Poor
No Good

No Good

Yes Good

No Good

No Average
No opinion Average
Financial data cannot beNo Current requirements serAverage

More guidance for registNo Good

Yes Good

No opinion No opinion
Yes Good

Yes Average
No Average

The description of the n No Poor

No Average
No opinion Good
No Good

I represent an sector gr Yes Is there any real need f No opinion

No opinion Average

No Good

Yes Average
No Average

Yes Good
No Good

Calculating financial da Yes Concerning the participatGood

No Poor
Yes Average
No Average
No Once all information is coAverage

No No opinion
No Good

No Average

No opinion Average

No Good

No Good
Yes Poor
No Average
No Average

No opinion Average
No No opinion

No Average

Yes Good
No Good

1. To have the opportunities to meet periodically some officials/representative


Sometimes we as NGOsYes
are 2. To propose a permanent
Average
mandate of liaison between Register (EP, EC and
No opinion No opinion
No Good

Financial section is a bi Yes Financial section - emploGood

No opinion No opinion

No opinion Good

Yes Good

No opinion Average

No At the contrary, level o Poor

No Good

No Poor
It is challenging to deci No No opinion
No Good

Yes To reduced the required N


i o opinion

No Good
No No opinion
No Good

No Average

No opinion Good
Die folgenden Reformen knnten die Offenlegungspflichten vereinfachen:

Unklare Vorgaben wie zur Berechnung von Mitgliedsbeitrgen sind zu verme


No opinion No opinion
Mitgliedsbeitrgen mssen Organisationen unter hohem brokratischem Aufw
Unklare Vorgaben wie zur Berechnung von Mitgliedsbeitrgen sind zu vermeiden. Zur Schtzung von Mitgliedsbeitrgen mss
Yes Good
Die EU-Institutionen sollten ein integriertes Register ber alle mageblichen
Die EU-Institutionen sollten ein integriertes Register
fr die
berEuropische
alle mageblichen
Kommission,
EU-Strukturen
das Europische
und Plattformen
Parlament
fr und
die Europisch
sonstige E
Yes Poor

Yes Average
No Good

No For ALTER-EU, there is nPoor


Yes Average
No Good

No Goodstndigen Vertretung in Brssel ist der Umfang


Fr Organisationen mit einer
Vgl. Bemerkung zu 2.3.. Yes Analog zum in Punkt 2.1Poor
skizzierten Drei-Stufen-Modell sollten sich die Offen

The information that is c No As stated above, we beliAverage


No Average

No opinion Good
Nie, nie jest atwo, po No opinion Nie wiem, jak uproci, aAverage
No opinion Good

Siehe Teil A Nr. 1.1.c Yes Siehe Teil A Nr.1.1.c Poor

No Good
No opinion Good

It is just a matter of be No opinion Average

Yes Good

No opinion Average

No opinion No opinion

No opinion No opinion

No opinion Good

No Average
No Poor

Yes Poor

No opinion No opinion
No opinion Average

No opinion Poor
No Good

No opinion Average

We fully believe in the u No Average

We fully believe in the u No Average

No opinion No opinion

No Poor
No Poor

No Average

No opinion No opinion
Yes Average

No Average
Costs for carrying activi No Good

No opinion Good

No Average

Yes Good

No Poor

No Good

No Poor
No Poor
No opinion Average
Fr groe Organisationen mit stndigem Sitz in Brssel ist die Menge an abg
Analog zu dem in Punkt 2.1 skizzierten Drei-Stufen-Modell sollten sich die Of
Siehe Bemerkungen zu Yes Poor

No Poor

No Good

No Average

No opinion No opinion

the financial aspect see No Good


Yes Average

No opinion No opinion

No Average
Nach den bisherigen Erf No Es ist zu befrchten, da Poor

Le calcul des informationNo opinion Average

Yes Good
No opinion Good

No Good

No opinion Good
Yes Average
No Good

No Good
No Good

New or small organizationNo opinion Average


Yes Good
The Financial DeclarationNo Good

Yes ntotdeauna simplificareaGood


No Good

Yes Average
No As long as (like currentl Good
No Good
No Good

No Good

The section regarding finYes The section regarding finAverage


No Average

Yes Average

No Good
No Average
Yes Good

Yes Good

Yes Good

No Good

No opinion No opinion
No Good
No Average
No opinion Good
Yes Average

No opinion Average

No opinion Good
No Average
Yes Good

No opinion Average
No opinion Good
No Good
No opinion Good

No opinion Average

No opinion No opinion

No Good

No Good

No opinion Good

No Good

No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion
Yes Good
Yes Keine Angabe von Fina Good
Yes Average
No Quite the contrary. Pro Average

No Good
No Average
Yes Good

No opinion Good
No Average

No Average

No opinion Average
No Good
No Average

No No opinion
Yes Good
No opinion Average

Yes Good

Yes Average
No Good

No Average
No Good

No Poor
No opinion Good

No opinion Good
No opinion Good
Yes Average

No Good

Yes The very fact you're ask No opinion


No Good
No Average
No opinion Average
No Average
No opinion No opinion
Yes Poor
No Good
Yes, the information requNo There is no rationale to Poor
No No opinion
No The data required are basAverage
E' certamente facile fornYes Average
For CEO, there is no rationale to simplify the data disclosure requirements, e
No Poor

No Good
No opinion No opinion
Finantial data required isNo opinion Average
No Good

No Good
Yes Just register people whoAverage
No opinion Average
Yes Averagethe data disclosure requirements, especially
There is no rationale to simplify
ultimately leads to less data being disclosed. Rather, as set out above, the da
No requirements need strengthening.
Poor
As explained above, it i Yes See our concrete 30% p Poor
Offenlegungspflichten im Transparenzregister mssen im Hinblick auf den da

Insbesondere bei global aufgestellten groen Unternehmen


Die folgenden
ist die
Reformen
Aktualisierung
knntender
dieDaten
Offenlegungspflichten
im Transparenzregister
vereinfachen:
mit einem
Yes Good
Unklare Vorgaben wie zurYes
Berechnung von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
Unklare Vorgaben
sind zu Good
wievermeiden.
zur Berechnung
Zur Schtzung
von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
sind zu verme
mss

Die EU-Institutionen sollten


Yesein integriertes Register
Dieber
EU-Institutionen
alle mageblichen
sollten
Poor
EU-Strukturen
ein integriertesund
Register
Plattformen
ber alle
frmageblichen
die Europisch
Yes Good

Yes Good
Yes Good
Yes Good

No Good

No Good
No Average

No opinion Average
Yes The registrant should be Good
No Good

No Good

No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion

No Es gibt keinen Grund un Poor


Overall, it is easy to fi Yes There are sometimes someGood
No opinion Poor

No opinion Good

Yes No need to disclose fina Good


Disclosure requirements in the Transparency Register must be proportionate

Following reforms could lead to a simplification of the disclosure requirement


Especially for globally positioned large enterprises the update of the data in the Transparency Register comes with a significan
Unclear requirements as for the calculation of membership fees should be av
Unclear requirements asNo for the calculation of membership fees should beGoodavoided. The estimation of membership fees require
In our organisation, whi Yes See answer
The EU above should
institutions Good
provide an integrated register of all relevant EU st
The EU institutions shouldYesprovide an integrated register of all relevant EUPoor
structures and platforms for the European Commiss
No The data disclosure requPoor
No opinion Average

No Average

Yes No opinion

No opinion Good
No Poor
No opinion The data disclosure req No opinion

No opinion No opinion
Comme mentionn prcde
Yes No opinion

Yes Average
No opinion Average

No opinion Good

Die folgenden nderungen knnten die Offenlegungspflichten vereinfachen:


Unklare Vorgaben wie zur Berechnung von Mitgliedsbeitrgen sind zu verme
Die erforderliche Aktual Yes Die EU-Institutionen sollten
Good
ein integriertes Register ber alle mageblichen

The counting of lobbyingNo opinion Average

No Good
No it is extremely easy, the Average
No opinion No opinion

No Good

Number of persons expreNo opinion Good


No opinion Average
No opinion Good

No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good
possible without compromising essential information.
Transparency
For this, new
International
technological
suggest
solutions
to create
and an
an additional category of lobbyi

overhaul of the guidelines for the register should be


organisations
envisaged.that
Changes
are most
in this
active
regard
andshould
have the
include:
biggest budgets to influence

In terms of technical solutions Organisations having more than 3 high-level meetings per year with Commis

- Automatic alerts that ask registrants to reconfirmadvisors


implausible
or those
declarations
organisations
such as
spending
particularly
more than 1 million euros annually
No opinion Good
short explanations or registrants declaring higher activities
lobby expenditure
should receive
than turnover.
additionalIt scrutiny
should also
and be
can be asked to provide more

calculated how much lobby expenditure is declared on pertheirfull-time


activities.
lobbyist
Currently,
and ifabout
the amount
500 organisations
is smaller would fall in this catego
For large multinationals Yes Some of the information,Average
than a minimum wage orNo larger than 500,000/lobbyist/year
In general, this thereshould
shouldbebe explicitly
Gooda principle
confirmed.
that entries get updated when significa
Par exemple
Under demand
the current designles
Noofsthe register, it is easy to provide the information Good
required and the administrative burden is reasona
-Transparency
On the lobbying expenditure in particular datatoaccuracy
Rather than
might asking
be improved
for regular by registrants
updates,
askingintroducing
forthey
the should occur,data
for example, when
The disclosed International
data create supports
Noissues
opinion all efforts
of double Transparency
limit administrative
accounting for companiesInternational
burden on
suggests
andAverage
trade associations, as far
whenasgradual
possible
assembling without
disclosure
datacomprom requ
on memb
In
The terms
final of technical
sums solutions
are often Yes
subject to misunderstandings, Such awhich
As mentionedsystem would
create
above create
C a claims
unjustified
the Poor sort of of
light-registration to the EU Transparen
alleged non-compliance.
different
- Automatic budget
alertslines
that(staff,
ask office, consulting/communications
into a new category.
budgets)At least
separately.
oneasannual update should be maintained.
Noregistrants
opinion to reconfirmTransparency
implausible declarations
International such
suggest
Average particularly
to create an
short
additional
explanations
category or registran
of lobbyi
- On the lobbying expenditure in particular data accuracy In general, mightthere
be should
improved be by
a principle
asking for thattheentries
different
get budget
updated lines
when(staff,
significa
offic
Statoil
-- Drop-downis an internatio Yes introduced where possible, Statoil believes that lifor the
No opinion
Drop-down menusmenus should
should be A
A system
be introduced where possible, system particularly
of
of gradual
gradual data
particularly data disclosure
for the legislative
disclosure
legislativerequirements
files
files a
requirements could
could be
a registrants be based
is active
basedon on the
the follo
on(synced
follo
In term of better guidance - Available resources of the organisation (staff, lobby expenses etc.)
registrants
- Overhaul is of active on (synced
No opinionwithout
EULex or the-- legislative
Available resources
observatory).of the organisation (staff, lobby expenses etc.)
the guidelines to rule ambiguities The Activity
using non-technical
levels
methodology (meetings toNo
usedlanguage. opinion
with
assessEU the
officials,
number number
of full of access
time badges)
lobbyists per organis
-Siehe
betterB.2.1
guidance on howYes Siehe B.2.1orthe
to calculate Full-Time Equivalents
Maintaining Lobby
current
budgetsAverage
logic of
soincentives,
that entriesthose in theorganisations
register are comparable.
wishing to obt
In term of better guidance Yes -First, we levels
Activity believe(meetings
that organisations should not
with EU officials,
Poor be required
number of accessto disclose
badges) financia
Data accuracy on lobbying expenditure may also be improved by introducing
Yes Secondly, the goals sectionAverage
should be removed
-Under
Overhaul
the of the guidelines
current design of to rule
the out ambiguities
register, it is easy Maintaining
tousing
providenon-technical
the
the current language.
informationlogic of incentives, thoseand the fields ofwishing
organisations interesttosect
obt
A balance should be achNo opinion Norequired
opinion and the administrative burden is reasona
Leaving
-Oxfam aside thatonwehow
better international
guidance fuYes Finally,
to calculate Full-Time Equivalents
meetings organisations
ororexceeding
Lobby budgets Poorno
should
certain longer
sobudget
that be required to disclose to how much time
supports asentries
thresholds
in the then have compromising
provide additio
Yes all efforts to limit administrative burden on registrants far as possible without es
We believe that the proce No opinion
register
In termsare comparable.
of technical Yes
solutions detail to the register. Poor
Under the current
- Automatic design
alerts that askofregistrants
the register, it is easy to
to reconfirm provide the
implausible informationsuch
declarations required and the administrative
as particularly burdenorisregistran
short explanations reasona
Transparency
- better guidanceInternational
on how tosupports
calculateall efforts toEquivalents
Full-Time Transparency
limit administrative
International
or Lobby burden
budgets onsuggests
registrants
so introducing
that entriesas in
farthe
asgradual
possible
register data
without
are disclosure
comprom
comparable. requ
In
As terms
- On the of
explainedtechnical
lobbying
above, solutions
expenditure
it is No
often in particular
very complicated Such
data accuracy
There
and aissystem
might would
no rationale
burdensome be create
improved
for to Poor
companies bya asking
sort
andoftrade
light-registration
for the totoassemble
different budget
associations thelines
EU Transparen
(staff, offic
all the da
- Automatic alerts that ask registrants to reconfirmTransparency
Yes implausible
See declarations
International
our concrete 30% p Poor such
suggest
as particularly
to create an short
additional
explanations
category
or registran
of lobbyi
- On the lobbying expenditure in particular data accuracy In general,might
there
be should
improved be bya principle
asking forthatthe
entries
different
get budget
updated lines
when(staff,
significa
offic
- Drop-down menus should be introduced where possible,
A system particularly
of gradual data
for the
disclosure
legislative
requirements
files a registrants
could be
is active
based on
on (synced
the follo
No For FOEE, there is no raPoor
In term of better guidance - Available resources of the organisation (staff, lobby expenses etc.)
- Overhaul of the guidelines Yes to rule out ambiguities - Activity
using non-technical
levels (meetings Poor
language.
with EU officials, number of access badges)
- better guidance on howNo to opinion
calculate Full-Time Equivalents
MaintainingortheLobby
current Average
budgets
logic of
soincentives,
that entriesthose
in theorganisations
register are comparable.
wishing to obt

Yes Poor
quelques difficluts sur No Good ber den Export/ Import von CSV- oder Excel-
Die Mglichkeit, Informationen
Selbst wenn alle erford Yes Statt konkreter Dateneingabe
Average
knnten auch Links zu eigenen Webseiten, auf
No opinion Good
No opinion Good
Yes No opinion
Yes The accurate calculationAverage
See the previous response with respect to the ease of providing financial information.
No opinion for the register may pose some challenges
Preparing non-financial information No opinion
to international law firms for whom lobbying act
In addition, preparing theNo opinion for the register can pose challenges Good
information generally for law firms especially (but not solely) if th
It should be noted that some organisations whoseFirstly,
lobbying
as noted
activityabove,
Offenlegungspflichtenwouldimitrequire
shouldthem
be easier
to register
Transparenzregister for new
often
organisations
mssen take part in(including
im Hinblick consultatio
auf den daa
Finally, to be able to accurately
Yes record lobbying activities,
Secondly,firms
the need
percentage
to invest
Noofopinion
the
in raising
full-time
staff
equivalent
awareness (FTE)
of the
dedicated
time-recording
to lobbya
Unklare Vorgaben wie zur NoBerechnung
opinion von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
Unklare Vorgaben
sind zu Good
wievermeiden.
zur Berechnung
Zur Schtzung
von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
sind zu verme
mss
Instructions related to f No opinion
Unklare Vorgaben wie zur Berechnung von Mitgliedsbeitrgen sind zu vermeiden. Average Mitgliedsbeitrge sollten nur verffentlicht w
Die EU-Institutionen
Zur Strkung sollten
Yeseinund
der Transparenz integriertes Register
Dieber
der VerlsslichkeitEU-Institutionen
der alle
Datenmageblichen
sollten
PoorEU-Strukturen
ein integriertes
im Transparenzregister und
Register
sollten Plattformen
die ber alle
frmageblichen
EU-Institutionendie Europisch
ein integri
Yes Siehe Antwort zu Frage Poor

Die korrekte Kalkulation Yes Die korrekte Kalkulation Average

Improvements in the metho


Yes see above No opinion
Under the current design of the register, it is easy to provide the information required and the administrative burden is reasona
Transparency International supports all efforts to Transparency
limit administrative International
burden on suggests
registrants introducing
as far asgradual
possible data
without
disclosure
comprom requ
In terms of technical solutions Such a system would create a sort of light-registration to the EU Transparen
-Although
Automatic thealerts that
recent ask registrants to reconfirmTransparency
guidYes implausible
Although the declarations
International
recent guidGood such
suggest
as particularly
to create an short
additional
explanations
category or registran
of lobbyi
- On the lobbying expenditure in particular data accuracy In general, might there
be should
improved be by
a principle
asking for thatthe
entries
different
get budget
updated lines
when(staff,
significa
offic
- Drop-down menus should be introduced where possible, A system particularly
of gradual data for the disclosure
legislative requirements
files a registrants
could be is active
basedon on(synced
the follo
In term of better guidance No - Available resources of the Good organisation (staff, lobby expenses etc.)
-Insbesondere
Overhaul of the No
guidelines opinion
to rule out ambiguities - Activity
using non-technical
levels (meetings No
language.opinion
with EU officials, number of access badges)
bei global aufgestellten groen Unternehmen
Offenlegungspflichten
ist die Aktualisierung
im Transparenzregister
der Daten im mssen im Hinblick auf den da
- better guidance on mit
Transparenzregister No
howeinem opinion
to calculate Full-Time
erheblichen Equivalents
Maintaining
brokratischen
verhltnismig orthe
AufwandLobby
current
sein. logicopinion
budgetsNo
verbunden.
Auerdem of
soDie
incentives,
that
mssen entries
folgenden those
sieinhinsichtlich
theorganisations
registerihres
Reformen are comparable.
wishing to obt
Verpflichtungs
knnten dazu beitragen, Yes
denUnternehmen
brokratischen Aufwand
Diediefolgenden
zustetige
begrenzen Reformen Poor
und Transparenz
knnten die zu Offenlegungspflichten
strken: vereinfachen:
Fr multinational agierende bedeutet Aktualisierung der Daten im Transparenzregister einen nicht un
No opinion No opinion
Unklare Offenlegungspflichten im Transparenzregister mssen im Hinblicksindauf
zu den da
Unklare Vorgaben
Vorgaben wiewie zur
z.B.Berechnung
zur Berechnung von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
Unklare Vorgaben
von Mitgliedsbeitrgen sind sind
zu
wievermeiden.
zur Berechnung
zu vermeiden. Zur Schtzung
von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
Diese werdenvonzum Teil unter verme
hohem b
Mitgliedsbeitrgen
Only the information mssen
for No Organisationen unter Mitgliedsbeitrgen
hohemisbrokratischem
There no reason mssen
to sim Aufwand
PoorOrganisationen
Informationen unterDritter
hohem brokratischem Aufw
Insbesondere
einholen, bei global
die nicht aufgestellten
verifizierbar groen Unternehmen
sind. hinaus Die folgenden
Mitgliedsbeitrge
einholen,
sollten
dieistdaher
die
Reformen
nichtAktualisierung
nur knnten
verifizierbar
dann der
dieDaten
verffentlicht
sind. Offenlegungspflichten
im Transparenzregister
Mitgliedsbeitrge
werden, wenn solltenvereinfachen:
daher mit
nureinem
dann
Die
The EU-Institutionen
last update sollten
of the Yes darber
registerweit
introduced eine Transparenz-Plattform
a requirement forMitglieder
consultancies frAverage
alle Organe
to provide (Europische
information onbeitragen, Kommission,
the costs Europisch
for carrying out
einzelne Mitglieder zu einem berwiegenden einzelne
Anteil zur Finanzierung
zu einemder Verbandsaktivitten
weit berwiegenden Anteil zur Finanzierung dero
It is relevant
Unklare in
Vorgabena wie zurNoBerechnung
transparency opinion
context to know
von that a client
Mitgliedsbeitrgen
Unklare is
Vorgabenpaying
sind zua
wie Average
consultancy
vermeiden.
zur Berechnung a
Zur certain
Schtzung
von amount of money
Mitgliedsbeitrgen
von for an
Mitgliedsbeitrgen
sind assignm
zu verme
mss
die in den Aufgabenbereich des Transparenzregisters die infallen.
den Aufgabenbereich des Transparenzregisters fallen.
Hence, we would strongly Yes
recommend to go backAs to stated
registering
in theonly
previousGood
our revenue, both in total and as per client, in order to inc
Die EU-Institutionen sollten
Yes ein integriertes Register
Die EU-Institutionen sollten ein integriertes Register Die ber
EU-Institutionen
Dieber alle mageblichen
EU-Institutionen
alle mageblichen sollten
Poor
sollten EU-Strukturen
ein
ein integriertes
integriertesund
EU-Strukturen Register
und Plattformen
Register ber
ber alle
Plattformen frmageblichen
alle die Europisch
mageblichen
It isdie
fr often burdensome
Europische Yes
Kommission, das Europische See
fr ourEuropische
answer
Parlament
die undinsonstige
2.1. Poor
Kommission,
EU-Einrichtungen
das Europische zur Verfgung
Parlament und sonstige E
stellen und direkt mit dem Yes
Transparenzregister verknpfen.
stellen und direkt mit dem Poor
Transparenzregister verknpfen.
En ce qui concerne les ca No opinion No opinion

Yes The accurate calculationAverage

No Average
No Good

Under the current designYesof the register, it is easyDie


to provide
Vorgaben themssen
informationkon required and the administrative burden is reasona
Poor
Transparency InternationalNosupports
opinion all efforts to Transparency
limit administrative
International
burden on
Goodsuggests
registrants
introducing
as far asgradual
possible
data
without
disclosure
compromrequ
In terms of technical solutions Such a system would create a sort of light-registration to the EU Transparen
- Automatic alerts that ask registrants to reconfirmTransparency
implausible declarations
Internationalsuch suggest
as particularly
to create an short
additional
explanations
category
or registran
of lobbyi
- On the lobbying expenditure in particular data accuracy
In general,might
there
be should
improved be by
a principle
asking forthatthe
entries
different
get budget
updatedlines
when(staff,
significa
offic
see previous menus
- Drop-down comment Yesbe introduced where possible,
should Ideally
A system theparticularly
ofbasic infordata
gradual No
for the opinion
disclosure
legislative
requirements
files a registrants
could be
is active
basedonon(synced
the follo
In term of better guidance - Available resources of the organisation (staff, lobby expenses etc.)
No to rule out ambiguities
- Overhaul of the guidelines There
usingisnon-technical
- Activity no rationale
levels tolanguage.
(meetings Poor
with EU officials, number of access badges)
- better guidance on howYesto calculate Full-Time Equivalents
Maintainingorthe Lobby
current
budgets
logic
Poorofsoincentives,
that entriesthose
in theorganisations
register are comparable.
wishing to obt
The way to compute costs Yes No opinion
Yes Good
No opinion Average

No opinion Poor
Under the current design of the register, it is easyDisclosure
to provide requirements
the information
of required and the administrative
the Transparency burden
Register should is reasona
be proportiona

Transparency
In particular forInternational
internationalsupports all efforts
corporations to Transparency
it takes limit
The administrative
a tremendous
following International
burden on
recommendations
bureaucratic suggests
registrants
effortcouldintroducing
to updateasto
help farease
theirasgradual
possibledata
Transparencywithout
disclosure disclosure
comprom
requirements:
Register requ
entry
In terms of technical solutions
Unclear rules for calculation of membership fees should Such
Unclear a be
system
rules forwould
avoided. In create
calculation
order toa estimate
of sort of light-registration
membership membership
fees should to
fees, the EU Transparen
beorganisations
avoided. In order
have
- Automatic alerts that ask Noregistrants to reconfirm implausible declarationsPoor such as particularly short explanations or registran
EU institutions should establish
Yes Transparency
an integrated register
EU institutions International
covering allshould
relevant suggest
establish
Poor
EU to create
structures
an integrated an additional
and platforms
register of thecategory
covering
European of lobbyi
all relevant
CommEU
-Additional
On the lobbying expenditure
guidelines sh No in particular data accuracy might be improved by asking for the different budget lines (staff, offic
Good
In general, there should be a principle that entries get updated when significa
- Drop-down menus should be introduced where possible, particularly for the legislative files a registrants is active on (synced
A system of gradual data disclosure requirements could be based on the follo
In term of better guidance - Available resources of the organisation (staff, lobby expenses etc.)
En ce qui concerne
- Overhaul les i No opinion
of the guidelines to rule out ambiguities - Activity
using non-technical
levels (meetings Average
language.
with EU officials, number of access badges)
- better guidance on how to calculate Full-Time Equivalents
Maintainingorthe Lobby
current
budgets
logic of
soincentives,
that entriesthose
in theorganisations
register are comparable.
wishing to obt
Yes Poor
Offenlegungspflichten im Transparenzregister mssen im Hinblick auf den da

Insbesondere bei global aufgestellten groen Unternehmen


Die folgendenist die
Reformen
Aktualisierung
knntenderdieDaten
Offenlegungspflichten
im Transparenzregister
vereinfachen:
mit einem
No opinion Average
Si la majorit
Unklare des inform
Vorgaben Yes
wie zur Face laVorgaben
Berechnung von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
Unklare problmatique
sind zu Good
wievermeiden.
zur Berechnung
Zur Schtzung
von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
sind zu verme
mss
No Poor
Die EU-Institutionen sollten
Yesein integriertes Register
Dieber
EU-Institutionen
alle mageblichen
sollten
Poor
EU-Strukturen
ein integriertesund
Register
Plattformen
ber alle
frmageblichen
die Europisch
No Es gibt es keine nachvo Poor

No opinion Average
No opinion Poor
No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion

As explained
AmCham
EFPIA EU above,
believeswelcomes
that theit issthe
often
Yes very complicated
Transparency and
Register burdensome
Implementing
Please for companies
Guidelines,
see 2.2 above. which provide more clarity on some of the opera
Average
and trade associations to assemble all the data on membership costs,
No Good
especially
1) The staff since a percentage
costs: the currentofguidelines
the organisations
state thatlobby cost ofofthat
all shares staff costs including gross/fees allowances, bonuses and be
I'm
The a student and I don't Yes I think (only supposition Average
2) current
membership data
needs
The methodologydisclosure
to beused may be misleading
investigated
to count year
the when
by year
number calculating
of through
people aggregate
long research
involved lobbying
in lobbying expenses
activities (25%, per
50%, sector
75%,represented
100%) is notbyclear
trade
processes.
3) AmCham ThisEUinformation No opinion
is then often
is not comfortable with subject to various
the definition possible
of representation Goodas currently provided by the guidelines.
costs
For
4) instance, UNESPA
misinterpretations
Consultancies which
and law Yes
is
canmember
create
firm of Insurance
unjustified
annual Europe.
UNESPA
claims
See to
costs related Insurance
belives
concrete
ofactivities:
alleged 30% that
Europes
theAverage
proposal
AmCham EU lobbying
on expenses
membership
believes costs
that this are solely based
above.
information on its natio
is not relevant for
non-compliance. Yes Poor
Moreover, AmCham EU would Yes also welcome more Please
claritysee
on the
2.2 given
above.possibilities
Average of an enforcement mechanism overseeing c
Yes There may be merit in incGood
The documentation is easy No opinion Average
More clarity could be pr Yes No opinion
Some of the questions arYes A definition and the pur Average
For large multinational Yes Some of the information,Average
voir commentaire ci-des Yes No opinion
Yes Good

The data disclosure requirements should be fully compliant with the relevant
No Average

No opinion No opinion

Yes No opinion

BASE regrette le manque Yes BASE appelle un cadrag Average


1. To facilitate the disclosure of participation in EUAs
structures
suggestedand
under
platforms
the response
(High-level
to the
groups,
question
'Consultative
B. 2.1, there
Committees',
is room for 'Ex
sim
No opinion No opinion
This suggestion of automatic pre-filling of the data1.already
Changeine.g.
posession
the 6th of
cost
theelement
EU authorities
to only include
(as it is trade
the case
associations/netwo
already for the l
No No opinion
2. It is often very complicated,
Yes time-consuming and 2. burdensome
the requirement
for a
totrade
report
Average
association
the amount(and
of people
any company
involvedmembers)
and their respectiv
to assem
No opinion No opinion
Il s'agit, en l'tat, d'u No opinion Average
No Average
No Good
As explained above, it i Yes See our 30% proposal o Poor
No There will always be a c Poor

Comme mentionn prcde


Yes
prcdemment, Noseraient
des prcisons sur la mthode de calcul opinion ncessaires afin d'viter toute mauvaise i
Yes No opinion
No Good
As far as the financial Yes Providing the respondentAverage
No Good

Yes siehe
Siehe 2.1
oben Poor
Die gewissenhafte ErhebYes (Seitens der EU-Insitutionen
Average
knnte z.B. ein integriertes Register ber Mitglie
Providing comprehensiveYes In light of the above comGood
Providing the informatio Yes See point 4.1. No opinion
Most of the data is easi Yes It is important to keep t No opinion
No The disclosure requiremePoor
As per the comment above Yes A clearer, more streamli No opinion

As the number of errors No There is no rationale to Poor


No Good

No opinion Good
No Average

No Good

Insurance Europe agrees that the right type of information is required from registrants to the TR. However, the current data dis
No opinion Good
The estimation of the re Yes A simpler framework for
For instance, Insurance Europes lobbying expenses are solely based on its Average
national members contributions. However, Insura
One issue we encounter No is the provision of numbers of naturalque
S, creemos persons
hay dos
Good
within our membership,
importantes mejoras asqueweseare an umbrella
podran hacer: organis
No would like the TR to offer the possibility for trade
Therefore, Insurance Europe No opinion
associations and their members (as well as thei
El elemento ms complejo Yesy que genera un mayorInsurance
Con
coste Europe
respecto a losbelieve
burocrtico es elAde
gastos verage
dereunir
membresa
toda la en
informacin
las asociaciones,
sobre costes
Repsol
deapues
memb
Once information is submi
No opinion No comment
Die Erhebung der Daten insbesondere zu Mitarbeiterkapazitten und finanziellenNo opinion
Mitteln ist zwar gerechtfertigt, verursacht abe
Tambin es muy difcil llevar
Yes un seguimiento de todos
Con respecto
los actosapblicos
los gastos
oAverage
eventos
asociados
en los
a laque
participacin
hayan participado
en actosmiembros
pblicos ode
e
No opinion Average
Yes Insbesondere die EinbeziAverage
Organisations are adaptiYes There might be possibili Average
Organisations are adaptiYes There might be possibili Average
No Average
Les donnes financires concernant l'valuation cot de la force de travail consacre au activits de lobbying sont les plus dif
Le deuxime point de difficult
Yes concerne les financements
Oui, par exemple,
reus deseninstitutions
laisNo opinion
europennes pour les groupes qui ont de nom
Sometimes it is a bit dif Yes We think it would be bettGood

No Average

AFA agrees that the right type of information is required from registrants to the Transparency Register. However, the current da
Therefore, AFA supports Yes
the possibility for trade associations
AFA supportsand
thetheir
possibi
members
No opinion
(as well as their members members) to be ab
No Average

No opinion Good
Il est
As ncessaire
mentioned, de veil
some No
information Average
required are unclear and difficult to interpret and collect. This leads to misinterpretations whic
Yes Requesting detailed datas Average
Generell sollte
Some of the von unkl Yes
information required such as the FTE calculation is unnecessary Average
complicated and does not allow to have a consis
No More data should be reqPoor
Certain information required for registrations is easy to provide, and the Implementing Guidelines do provide helpful guidance
Generell
We cannotsollte von unkl
disclose Yes data which is not publicly available and therefore
financial Average
agree that the financial data to be provided (i.e.
Generell sollte von unkl Yes s.o. Poor
In addition, as noted above,
Yes the estimation of the Please
full time
see
equivalent
response of
to staff
No opinion
working on activities falling within the scope of th
Yes Average

Insbesondere bei grerYes Die erwarteten Angaben Poor


s

No Poor
Le recensement des persNo No opinion

No opinion No opinion
The last update of the register introduced a requirement for consultancies to provide information on the costs for carrying out o
No Poor
It is relevant in a transparency context to know that a client is paying a consultancy a certain amount of money for an assignm
No opinion
Hence, we would strongly recommend going back to registering only our revenue, Average both in total and as per client, in order to inc
As of today,Cambre
In addition,
DIGITALEUROPE there iswelcomes
a c Yes
would likethe
to Transparency Additional
report its hesitations
Register guidelines
in guidelines,
some wo Average
caseswhich
when indicating
provide in financial
some clarity onbrackets revenues for
the methodology from clien
entities
Making the distinction between
Yes the two would enable As stated
the register
in the previousGood
to provide better and more accurate data since the budget ra
Furthermore, we believe Yes that the methodology used Please
to declare
see above
the number
our anAverage
of people involved in lobbying activities is not clear
Yes UniCredit esteems that t Average
The FTE calculation couNo Poor

Yes Average
Having to report our membership contributions to professional associations which are themselves registered in the European T
Nopercentage
In addition, estimating the opinion of time spent by internal experts whose Average
main activity is not lobbying can be time consum
No opinion Good
Both of these points are No The are
consistent with the guidelines
We goal to achievelobbying
forcomfortable
declaring a fu Poor
with theexpenses
degree ofdeveloped
flexibility allowed
jointly with
in the
Transparency
current guideli
Int
No Average

No opinion Average
The information requiredNo I consider the procedure Average

No opinion Average

No Average

No For small organisations Poor


The system could be made simpler for registrants and those accessing the re
Its never easy to fill in No opinion To capture the nature of No opinion
Beim ersten Mal mssenNo Fr LobbyControl
Proposition
Registrationn8
could gibt
alsoebe
: Rendre Poor
linscription plusifsimple
made simpler en intgrant
there was les indicateurs
a list of specific dossiers
Les lignes de conduite nYes De nombreuses organisations
Averagefournissent des informations errones sur le re
It is easy to provide the Yes Some automatic error alerts
Poorcould be programmed, for example when there a
Comments or suggestions
3.1 The
(Optional)
Code of Conduct
Comments or suggestions
a) The
(Optional)
present procedu

Fully agree Fully agree

Partially agree Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree No opinion


Partially agree Fully agree

No opinion Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree
No opinion Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

It should be improve conFully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion Fully agree


sieh oben Fully agree Fully agree

Partially agree No opinion

Disagree They are not mandatory.Disagree

Fully agree Fully agree


No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion No opinion

Disagree Disagree

Disagree No opinion
Fully agree No opinion
Disagree Disagree
No opinion Fully agree
Partially agree Point (h) concerning the No opinion

Partially agree Partially agree


Partially agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Disagree Manca nel codice l'obbligPartially agree

Fully agree No opinion


nous n'avons pas vrifi Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree Partially agree

No opinion No opinion
Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
No opinion No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Disagree


Partially agree Partially agree
Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree


Partially agree Disagree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion


Debe haber un apartadoFully
p agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


No opinion Fully agree
siehe 2.1 Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree Partially agree
Partially agree No opinion

Fully agree No opinion


Disagree non, au vu du constat quNo opinion
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree Partially agree

No opinion No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree
Disagree Partially agree
Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion

No opinion Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Partially agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Partially agree

Partially agree Fully agree


Bis auf: s. 2.2 Ich bef Fully agree Fully agree

Partially agree Partially agree


Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree No opinion
Partially agree The CoC is pretty basic Partially agree
The information providedFully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Disagree

Fully agree Fully agree

There is no guarantee tha


Partially agree No opinion

Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree Fully agree
No opinion No opinion
Fully agree Disagree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Partially agree Partially agree
Partially agree Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Disagree Disagree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Partially agree No opinion
Disagree Self-declarations are notPartially agree

No opinion No opinion
Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree No opinion
Partially agree Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Partially agree Knnte kompakter sein -No opinion


over half the entries contain factual errors or implausible numbers; around 3844 groups declare expenditure of less than a min
SOLUTION:
Each time a registration isFully agree
sent, it should be first checked for accuracy andNo opinion before being approved and published i
compliance
Partially agree No opinion
It is important that the companies confidential information is really confidential, otherwise, it intervenes with the internal marke
No opinion No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree
No opinion No opinion

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Partially agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Partially agree

Partially agree Partially agree

Fully agree No opinion

Partially agree Partially agree


Partially agree Fully agree
Partially agree No opinion

Partially agree Partially agree

Fully agree No opinion

Partially agree Fully agree


Informations manquantePartially agree Disagree

Partially agree No opinion


Partially agree Partially agree
Partially agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Partially agree Disagree

Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion No opinion
Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Partially agree

No opinion No opinion
Partially agree No opinion

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

cf plus haut. les inform Partially agree No opinion

Partially agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion

No opinion No opinion
Fully agree No opinion

No opinion Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion

Partially agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion Partially agree

Partially agree Partially agree


i have checked some butDisagree Code of conduct implies Fully agree

No opinion No opinion

No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Partially agree No opinion
Partially agree Fully agree

Partially agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Il serait intressant d'a Partially agree Partially agree


Partially agree No opinion

Partially agree Partially agree


Partially agree Partially agree

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree No opinion

No opinion Partially agree


It should be mandatory toFully agree Fully agree
Some registrants are morFully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree

No opinion Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree Fully agree

We do not have the impre


Disagree The Code of Conduct is q
Disagree

No opinion No opinion
Partially agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

non possibile avere uno


Fully agree No opinion

Accepting data given is No opinion I am not qualified to co Fully agree

Disagree No opinion
Partially agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Partially agree Partially agree


Partially agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree
The overall data quality Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Partially agree No opinion

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree No opinion


The data quality is not Partially agree Partially agree
No opinion Partially agree
No opinion Partially agree

Partially agree Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Disagree Transparency is not a virNo opinion

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Partially agree


Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion

No opinion No opinion

Fully agree No opinion


The Code of Conduct covers many important points although some importan
Fully agree Partially
The Code of Conduct should agree
prohibit the representation by private firms (inclu

The Code of Conduct should also prohibit the representation by private firms

Breaches of the Code of Conduct should be more readily sanctioned; see be


Partially agree Partially agree
More information here:
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%
The Code of Conduct
entries oncovers many important points although some importan
Transparency International has estimated that over
http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/press/release.faces/en/63655/html.boo
half of the the lobby register contain factual errors or implausible
http://corporateeurope.org/pressreleases/2015/01/european-pr-firms-whitewa
The Code
to the of Conduct should prohibit theitsrepresentation by private firms (inclu
The human resources and Partially
softwareagree
capacity devoted EU lobby register,
Disagree
as well as investigatory and enforcement po
Transparency International has estimated that over
Thehalf
Code
of the
of Conduct
entries onshould
the lobby
alsoregister
prohibit contain
the representation
factual errors
byorprivate
implausible
firms
Fully agree Partially agree
The human resources and software capacity devoted
Breaches
to theofEUthelobby
Coderegister,
of Conduct
as well
should
as itsbeinvestigatory
more readilyand
sanctioned.
enforcement po
Partially agree Disagree
Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree


Disagree In my experience, the 'ruDisagree
Partially agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion No opinion
Die Vergleichbarkeit der Daten im Register sollte dringend gestrkt werden. Dazu sind insbesondere unklare Vorgaben wie zu
Fully agree Fully agree
Um Transparenz zu strken, sollten Nichtregierungsorganisationen verpflichtet werden, przise Informationen ber ihre jeweili
Fully agree Partially agree

Disagree Disagree
Fully agree Fully agree
The Code of Conduct covers many important points although some importan
Transparency International has estimated that over half of the entries on the lobby register contain factual errors or implausible
The Code of Conduct should prohibit the representation by private firms (inclu
The human resources and software capacity devoted to the EU lobby register, as well as its investigatory and enforcement po
Partially agree A further concern is that Disagree
the Code of Conduct is too indirectly linked to the sy
Partially agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Durch die aktuell engen Fully agree Partially agree

The amount of data that Fully agree We support the set of ru Fully agree
Partially agree Disagree

Fully agree Fully agree


Disagree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree

Siehe 3.1 Kommentar Disagree Siehe Teil A 1.1.c. Disagree

Fully agree Fully agree


Partially agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion No opinion

No opinion No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Disagree Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Partially agree Something should be add


No opinion
Fully agree Partially agree

There is no information No opinion No opinion


Fully agree Fully agree

Disagree There are too many fudgPartially agree

Although not regularly s Fully agree No opinion

Although not regularly s Fully agree No opinion

No opinion No opinion

Partially agree Die Paragrafen sind so Partially agree


all Lobbying organisati Disagree all large financial inst Disagree

Partially agree Disagree

No opinion Partially agree


Partially agree Fully agree

No opinion Entfaltet im Zweifel kein Partially agree


Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Partially agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Partially agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Partially agree Disagree


Je leest wat de lobbyist Partially agree Dit pakket van regels en Disagree
Partially agree Partially agree
Durch die engen Raster,Fully agree Partially agree

Disagree Disagree

Fully agree No opinion

Partially agree Partially agree

Partially agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree


Partially agree Partially agree

Fully agree No opinion

Transparency International hat im vergangenen Jahr 4.253 Einzelbeschwerden wegen Fehleintrgen im Transparenzregister e
Fully agree Fully agree
Daher ist es von ganz grundlegender
Partially agree
Bedeutung,Verste
dass dasgegen
Registersekretariat
den VerhDisagree
personell ausreichend ausgestatt ist, so dass g

La qualit de certaines Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion


Partially agree No opinion
Fully agree No opinion

Partially agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree The Register should keeDisagree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion Partially agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Mixed: some data entrie Fully agree Fully agree


Partially agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Disagree

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree


In General ok, but one c Fully agree No opinion
Partially agree No opinion
Fully agree Partially agree
Partially agree No opinion

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Partially agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree

Pas de vrification, c'es Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion No opinion

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree No opinion
Partially agree Insuficiente, el cdigo No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree No opinion
Partially agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Partially agree Partially agree

Partially agree Disagree

Partially agree No opinion


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree No opinion

e web application meansNo opinion Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
No opinion No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Partially agree Fully agree

Transparency Internationa
Partially agree The Code of Conduct cove
Disagree
Partially agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
No opinion No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Partially agree Partially agree
Partially agree The Code of Conduct covers many
Partially important points although some importan
agree
Fully agree Fully agree
The Code of Conduct should prohibit the representation by private firms (inclu
No opinion No opinion
Transparency InternationalFully
hasagree
estimated that over
Thehalf
Code
of the
of Conduct Partially
entries onshould
the alsoagree
lobby register
prohibit contain
the representation
factual errors
byorprivate
implausible
firms
Fully agree Fully agree
The Code of Conduct covers many important points although some importan
The human resources and Partially
software
agree
capacity devoted
Breaches
to theofEUthelobby
Coderegister,
of Disagree
Conduct
as well
should
as itsbeinvestigatory
more readilyand
sanctioned;
enforcement
see po
be
differs tremendously per No opinion No opinion
The Code of Conduct should prohibit the representation by private firms (inclu
The data provide
Transparency a basicFully
International hasagree
estimated that over half of the entries on thePartially
lobby agree
register contain factual errors or implausible
Fully agree A further concern is that Partially
the Codeagree
of Conduct is too indirectly linked to the sy
The human resources and Partially
software
agree
capacity devoted to the EU lobby register,
Disagree
as well as its investigatory and enforcement po

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Partially agree


I would like to find also Fully agree Partially agree
Transparency International has estimated that over half of the entries on the lobby register
contain factual errors or implausible numbers andThe it made
Codea offormal
Conduct
complaint
coversabout
manyover
important points although some importan
4,200 entries! This reflects the scale of the challenge
suchandas inappropriate
the current lackbehaviour
of capacityremain
of undefined. This should be remedie
the secretariat to properly monitor the data in the along
register.
the lines of the European Parliament's decision of April 2014 on the mo
The human resources and software capacity devoted the inter-institutional
to the EU lobby agreement
register, as onwellthe
asTransparency Register.
its investigatory and enforcement powers, need toThe be Code
totallyoftransformed
Conduct should
so that prohibit
effective
the representation by private firms (inclu
monitoring checks are carried out on at least 20 per firms,
cent
PRoffirms,
all declarations
law firms) of
eachregimes
year, and
the EU considers to be in breach of hum
Es obliegt in erster
all complaints Lin with
are dealt Fullyspeedily.
agree Particular priority
The Codeshouldof Conduct
be allocatedFully
should agree
to ensuring
also prohibit
the the representation by private firms
No opinion
accuracy of the financial data within registrations tobacco
and software
industry. No opinion
could easily be used to
alert registrants to particularly unlikely-looking postings
Breaches(seeofbelow
the Code
for more
of Conduct
detail) and
shouldto be more readily sanctioned; see be
highlight unlikely-lookingPartially
entries to
agree
staff, enablinginformation.
speedy follow-up investigations.
Disagree
The comparability of the Fully agree Partially agree

Die Verstndlichkeit der Daten im Register sollte dringend verbessert werden, um Fehlinterpretationen und reputationsschdig
Fully agree Fully agree
Die Vergleichbarkeit der Fully
Datenagree Fully
im Register sollte dringend gestrkt werden. agree
Dazu sind insbesondere unklare Vorgaben wie zu

Damit Transparenzvorgaben
FullySinn
agree
machen, mssen sie fr alle Organisationen
Partially
gleichermaen
agree gelten: Nichtregierungsorganisa
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree


Data control should be i Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree

Due to the obligation of No opinion Fully agree

Sompe data seem to be F


oully agree No opinion
No opinion No opinion

Nach Untersuchungen von Partially agree Der Verhaltenskodex entDisagree


It would be useful to havFully agree Fully agree
No opinion Disagree

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


The structure of the Transparency Register portal should be improved in order to avoid misinterpretation and reputation damag

In particular, the categories "full-time equivalent (FTE)" and "number of persons involved," lead to misunderstandings, if users

The comparability of the data in the register should be strengthened. Unclear requirements as for the calculation of membersh
Fully agree Partially agree
All organisations should Fully agree Much more can and must be done to boost transparency
Fullytowards
agree
The EU institutions should actively promote a culture of compliance and work ensuring that register entries are in acco
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to
Fully agree Partially agree
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered
The data from Transparen Partially agree The Code of talks,
Trilogue Conduct inclDisagree
by which 90% of EU law is decided in fast-track mode beh
Fully agree Membership of expert Partially agreegroups of the Commission must have f
and advisory
Open data must be implemented to ensure that EU documents and inform
No opinion Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree


In the first paragraph of the Code of Conduct:
Fully agree No opinion
"The parties hereto consider that all interest representatives interacting with t
There is not enough capac
Partially agree The sentence "registeredPartially
or not" should
agree be eliminated, as we want all lobbyis
Partially agree The Code of Conduct cove No opinion

No opinion No opinion
Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree No opinion


Certaines organisations Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree


some help could be given
Fully agree No opinion
No opinion No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree The principles containedNo opinion
Fully agree Partially agree

Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree Fully agree
Between 7 September 2015, when TI EU launched its original Alert to the JTRS, and 31 March 2016,

1619 new organisations signed up to the Register. Of these, 353 organisations, or 22% of the new

registrants, report that their lobbyists earn under 10,000 per year. 45 new registrants report

lobbying expenses of over 1 million. Approximately half of the new registrants, 768 organisations,
Partially agree Fully agree
report that their lobbying expenses exceed their total annual turnover.

The comparability of data should be improved. Especially


Recommendation: The Codewith regards to
of Conduct funding
itself of activities.
is appropriate andWhile
coversin the case of private
relevant aspects. sect
Secondly, including both Fully the number
agree of people involved as the amount of FTE Partially
can agree
be confusing and might lead to misleading
Set-up a proper monitoring system
Fully agreefor registrations What is not adequate at Fully the moment
agree is the enforcement of the Code. Those n
The combination of limited Fully agree with the absence
monitoring joindreof le consequences
code d'thiqu Partially agree that provide false, out-dated or inco
for organisations
Introducing
According toa aproper monitoring
basiccreate
plausibility systempublished
check is key to ensuring
of Conduct
by that
Transparency should
the International
information
be sanctioned.providedCurrently,
on agree
7The is
September the2015,
combination
over ofthe
limited monito
The disclosed data Noanopinion
inadequate understanding of stakeholders Partially
activities. methodology on howhalf entries
to calculate for
lobby
Since
This isthen, 780 of these
e.g. viewable organisations
in the
Fully
organizational
agree have updated theirofentry
representation DI in or been removed
European No from
activities,
opinion asthe theregister. Nevertheless,
fixed percentiles offer the
poorsituation
insight
meaningful, accurate, up-to-
Between 7 September 2015, date
whenand comprehensive.
TI EU launched absence A minimum
of any
its original consequences
Alertofto5%
theof declarations
JTRS, when
and 31 organisations
should be provide
March 2016, 1619 new false, out-dated o
organisations
No opinion No opinion
thoroughly checked eachFully
Recommendation: year.agree
When organisations information
first register,leadstheir
to dismal No data
opinion
declarations quality.
shouldInreceivethe current
an situation, organisations
The PRCA fully supports the development of ethical and professional standar
initial
Set-upquality
a propercheck and organisations
monitoring opinionforshould
No system be contacted
registrations incentive
The Codeto ifoftheir
provide
declarations
Conduct meaningful doupdates
Noisopinion
itself not fulfil to
appropriate minimum
their
and entries.
covers theIndeed
relevant weaspects.
see that a
Siehe B.2.1 a proper monitoringPartiallysystem With
agree is key to ensuring this
Mit einem inCompliance-Le
mind, we believeP in preserving
artially agree the distinction between those who
Introducing
Even when data is possible to provide What
the organisations
designannual is not
that
and underlying adequate
the information
at
assumptions the moment
provided
equate is isthe
meaningful,
itand/or enforcement
with the sort accurate,
of the
of information Code.
up-to-date
that Those
a lawand n
c
requirements. This should happen
Fully agree before To first
updating
increase have a
cycle
high-level
compliance 58%
with ofmeeting
Disagree
theorganisations
Code the have
receive
JTRS simply
should changed
make the
effective financi
use o
Whilst data quality has improved in recent years due to the Commission
A statutory code of conduct introducing
risks a newsituationmonitoring procedures,
where members a system
of the public of vier
The new rules Fully agree towards making
were originally No opinion
a parliament access badge. It geared
is also important tonotAn
make transparent
advantage
making anyofuse
effective any
changes undue
ourofindustry influence
sanctions code
whatsoever the
to ensure
compared
to thebig
all corporate
legislative interests
to a statutory
files theycode might
work is
on,exert
flexibi
staf
Fully agree Disagree
However
registrantsit play
is hardly a secret
by the No opinion
rules. to reveal
Even that they
repeated fail
It onalso
is
violations
numbers.that purpose
andworth as the
noting
miss-declarationsthat No
rules
UKopinion
stillso
allow
Register
have farof "regional"
lead to chambers
Consultant
not Lobbyists, of commerce
which is often an
As an organisation that Disagree Partially agree
any sanctions. Fully agree To increase compliance with Disagree
the Code the JTRS should make effective use o
A study by Transparency International has estimated that over half of the entries on the lobby register contain factual errors or
The Code of Conduct covers many important points although some importan
The combination of limited
human resources and monitoring
Partially
softwareagreewith thedevoted
capacity absence
Whattoisof consequences
the
notEU
adequate for organisations
lobby register,
at Disagree
the moment
as well as itsthat
is the provide false,
investigatory
enforcement and out-dated
of the Code. Toorincre
enforcement inco
po
According to a basic
The comparability plausibility
of the check published by
Fully agree Transparency International on
Partially 7 September
agree 2015, over half the entries for
The Code of Conduct covers many important points although some importan
Since then, 780 of these organisations have updated their entry or been removed from the representation
register.factual
Nevertheless, orthe situation
Transparency International has estimated that over
Thehalf
Code
of the
of Conduct
entries onshould
the lobby
prohibit
register
the contain by
errors
private implausible
firms (inclu
Between 7 September 2015, when TI EU launched its original Alert to the JTRS, and 31 March 2016, 1619 new organisations
The human resources and Partially
softwareagree
capacity devoted
A further
to the
concern
EU lobby is that
register,
Disagree
the Code
as well
of Conduct
as its investigatory
is too indirectly
and enforcement
linked to the po sy
Recommendation: The Code of Conduct itself is appropriate and covers the relevant aspects.
Disagree
Set-up a proper monitoring system for registrations Disagree
What is not adequate at the moment is the enforcement of the Code. Those n
Partiallysystem
Introducing a proper monitoring agree is key to ensuring
To increase thatcompliance
the informationNo opinion
with the
provided
Code is themeaningful,
JTRS should accurate,
make effective
up-to-date useand
o

Fully agree Disagree


Fully agree Fully agree
zT recht unterschiedlich Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree Disagree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree No opinion
Some data are reported F wully agree No opinion

No opinion No opinion
Fully agree However, the enforcement Fully agree
of the Code should equally be based on a sound s
We have no opinion on whether or not the qualityWe of data
would
is also
high.like
It istogenerally
add that accepted
the solicitor
thatprofession
the qualityinofEngland
data varies
and betwee
Wales i
We must also stress thatFully
we would
agreewelcome moreFurthermore,
resources dedicated
these codes toDisagree
the
setTransparency
out the core values
Register
of secretariat.
the profession, which are
Fully agree
Die Verstndlichkeit der Daten im Register sollte dringend verbessert werden, Fullyum
agree
Fehlinterpretationen und reputationsschdig
No opinion No opinion
Die Vergleichbarkeit der Fully
Datenagree
im Register sollte dringend gestrkt werden. Partially
Dazu sind
agreeinsbesondere unklare Vorgaben wie zu
Die Verstndlichkeit der Fully agree Partially agree

Manche Datenstze entha


Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree No opinion


Leitlinien fr die Umsetzung des Transparenzregisters vertraut sind. Der Informationsgehalt ber den
tatschlichen personellen Aufwand im Zusammenhang mit EU-Interessenvertretung ist bei der Angabe der
Vollzeitquivalente deutlich hher als bei der Angabe der beteiligten Personen. Daher sollte die Kategorie
Zahl der beteiligten Personen" gestrichen und aktiv gegen eine irrefhrende Darstellung von Informationen
aus dem Transparenzregister durch Dritte vorgegangen werden.
The combination of limited
Die Vergleichbarkeit monitoring
der Daten with the
im Register absence
sollte dringend of consequences
gestrkt werden. forDazu
organisations that provide
sind insbesondere false, out-dated or inco
unklare
According wie
Vorgaben to azur
basic plausibility
Berechnung check
von
Fully agree published by
Mitgliedsbeitrgen Transparency
zu vermeiden. International
Zur on
Schtzung
The Code is rightly a C Partially agree 7 September
von 2015,
Mitgliedsbeitrgenover half the entries for
Since then,
mssen 780 of these unter
Organisationen organisations have updated their
hohem brokratischem AufwandentryInformationen
or been removed from
Dritter the register.
einholen, Nevertheless, the situation
die nicht
Between 7 September
verifizierbar 2015, when TI
sind. Mitgliedsbeitrge EU launched its original Alert to the JTRS, wenn and 31einzelne
March 2016, 1619zu new organisations
Recommendation: Fully agreesollten daher nur dann verffentlicht werden, Partially agree Mitglieder
einem weit berwiegenden
Die Verstndlichkeit Anteil zur Finanzierung
der angegebenen der Verbandsaktivitten
Daten im Transparenzregister sollteNobeitragen,verbessert
dringend die in denwerden, da so weitreichende F
Set-up a proper monitoring Fully agreefor registrations
system opinion
Aufgabenbereich des Transparenzregisters fallen.The Code hinaus
Darber of Conduct itself
sollten dieisEU-Institutionen
appropriate andaktiv covers
einethe relevant aspects.
Introducing a properfrdern.
Compliance-Kultur No Es
opinion
monitoring system ishinzuwirken,
key to ensuring
Whatdass is not
thatadequate at Partially
the information theim agree
moment
provided isisthe
meaningful,
enforcement accurate,
of the Code.
up-to-date
Those
andn
Zudem sollte die Vergleichbarkeit der Daten innerhalb des Transparenzregisters dringend gestrkt werden.des
ist darauf Registereintrge Einklang mit den Leitlinien Dazu zhlen u.a. a
Fully agree
Transparenzregister-Sekretariats stehen, d.h. dieTo increase compliance
bereitgestellten with
Disagree
Informationen thenach
Code the JTRS
bestem should make effective use o
Wissen
vollstndig,
Grundstzlich aktuell und
sollten Fully
dienicht agree
irrefhrend
EU-Institutionen sind. Das Thegegenwrtige
Code of Conduct No opinion
Ungleichgewicht
covers manymindert
importantdie pointsInformationen
although some importan
Die Verstndlichkeit
Vergleichbarkeit, der
schadet Daten
dem im Registereine
politischen Ziel
aktive
sollte
der
Compliance-Kultur
dringend
Transparenz verbessert
und
frdern.
werden,
fhrt umDie
zu einem
abgegebenen
Fehlinterpretationen
einseitigen Blaming
sollten mit d
und reputationsschdig
For the reasons mentioned above we consider the
Thelevel
Codeof data
of Conduct
provided should
not sufficient
prohibit to
theensure
representation
proper transparency.
by private firms
Moreov
(inclu
derer,
The
Zudem die
human sich den Leitlinien
resources and entsprechend
Partially
software
sollten Transparenzrichtlinien agree
capacityverhalten.
devoted
gleichermaen Breaches
to the
fr alle of
EUthelobby
Code
Organisationenregister,
of Disagree
Conduct
as
gelten.well
should
as
Auch its
beinvestigatory
more readily and
sanctioned
enforcement
Nichtregierungsorganisationen po
sollte
Die Vergleichbarkeit der Daten im Register sollte dringend gestrkt werden. Dazu sind insbesondere unklare Vorgaben wie zu
Fully agree Partially agree
Damit Transparenzvorgaben Sinn machen, mssen sie fr alle Organisationen gleichermaen gelten:
Les informations
Darber dans lePartially
hinaus sollten agree
die EU-Institutionen Il serait
aktiv eine bon que ses r frdern.
Compliance-Kultur No opinionEsber
ist darauf hinzuwirken, dass Registereintr
Nichtregierungsorganisationen gehren genauso verpflichtet, przise Informationen ihre jeweiligen
There are exceptions, butFully agree Partially
Zuwendungsgeber und die jeweilige Hhe der Zuwendung im Transparenzregister zu verffentlichen. Eine agree
Damit Transparenzvorgaben
bloe Auflistung FullySinn
agree
von Zuwendungsgebern machen, mssen
wie Stiftungensie fr alledie
etc., Organisationen Partially
keine Klarheit gleichermaen
agree
ber gelten: Nichtregierungsorganisa
deren Interessen bringt,
The comparability
schafft of dat Fully
keine Transparenz undagree
belsst eine betrchtliche Gruppe von Organisationen Partially agreeauerhalb des Rahmens,
den sie selbst fr andereFully fordert.
agree Partially agree
Les donnes du registre Fully agree No opinion

Some data are reported F


wully agree No opinion

Better guidelines on the Fully agree Fully agree


The Transparency Registe No opinion Partially agree

Es gibt zu viele unters Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree Partially agree
The combination of limited monitoring with the absence of consequences for organisations that provide false, out-dated or inco
According to a basic plausibility check published by Transparency International on 7 September 2015, over half the entries for
Transparency
Since then, 780International has estimated
of these organisations that
have over half
updated of the
their entryentries on removed
or been the lobbyfrom
register
the contain
register.factual errors orthe
Nevertheless, implausible
situation
Between 7 September 2015, Fullywhen
agreeTI EU launched its original Alert to the No opinion
JTRS, and 31 March 2016, 1619 new organisations
The human resources and software capacity devoted
Recommendation: The Code
to the ofEU Conduct
lobby register,
covers
itself is many
as wellimportant
as itsand
appropriate investigatory
points
coversalthough
theand enforcement
some
relevant importan
aspects. po
Partially agree
Set-up a proper monitoring system for registrations Breaches of the Code of Disagree
Conduct should be more readily sanctioned
What is not adequate at the moment is the enforcement of the Code. Those n
Introducing a proper monitoring
Fully agree
system is key to ensuring
To increasethatcompliance
the information
with
Disagree
the
provided
Code is the
meaningful,
JTRS shouldaccurate,
make effective
up-to-date
useand
o
Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree No opinion

Les informations relativ No opinion No opinion

In order to avoid any misinterpretation and reputational damage by misleading media coverage, comprehensibility of data prov
The combination of limited monitoring with the absence of consequences for organisations that provide false, out-dated or inco
Comparability of data in the Register should urgently be improved. Unclear rules for calculation of membership fees should be
i processi di
According toassicurazio Partiallycheck
a basic plausibility agreepublished by
nonTransparency
dovrebbe essere conc
Disagree
International on 7 September 2015, over half the entries for
In order to transparency Fully
requirements
agree providing actual
Alongside
transparency,
the CoC, they
Volksw
Partially
need to agree
apply equally for any registrant. NGOs shou
Since then, 780 of these Noorganisations
opinion have updated their entry or been removed
Partially from
agreethe register. Nevertheless, the situation

Between 7 September 2015, when TI EU launched


TheitsCode
original
of Conduct
Alert to the
itself
JTRS,
is appropriate
and 31 March
and 2016,
covers1619
the relevant
new organisations
aspects.

Recommendation: What is not adequate at the moment is the enforcement of the Code. Those n
Fully
Set-up a proper monitoring agreefor registrations
system No opinion
Introducing a proper monitoring system is key to ensuring
To increase
thatcompliance
the information
with the
provided
Code is
the
meaningful,
JTRS should
accurate,
make effective
up-to-date
useand
o
Fully agree Disagree
Die Verstndlichkeit der Daten im Register sollte dringend verbessert werden,
Der Verhaltenskodex deckte um Fehlinterpretationen
viele wichtige Punkte ab,und reputationsschdig
obwohl einige wichtige
Fully agree No opinion
Die Vergleichbarkeit
Transparency der Fully
Daten
International agree
im Register
schtzt, dass ber dieLors
sollte Der deder
dringend
Hlfte son enregistreme
gestrkt
Verhaltenskodex
Eintrge im NoDazu
werden.
sollte opinion
sind insbesondere
Transparenzregister
es privaten Firmen unklare
faktische FehlerVorgaben
(Lobbyfirmen, oder wie zu
Anwaltskanzleie
implausible
see above. Partially agree Partially agree
Damit
SowohlTransparenzvorgabenFullySinn
der Personalbestand agree
und machen,
die mssen sie fr die
Softwarekapazitten allefr
Grundstzlich Organisationen
sollte
dasder Partially
Register gleichermaen
agree mitwerden
Verhaltenskodex
aufgewendet gelten:
dem Nichtregierungsorganisa
Sanktionssystem
als auch die Untersuchun
verbunde
Partially agree Disagree

It lacks uniform criteria, sFully agree No opinion


Somequality
Data of the could
information F
i ully agree
be improved by the publication of common guidelines as Fully agree
to what financial information
covers and how it should Fully
be calculated.
agree No opinion
EFPIA believes that the section regarding financial disclosure requires simplification. Revised and simplified Implementing Gui
Fully agree Partially agree
As encouraged by the renewed Inter-Institutional Agreement between the European Parliament and the European Commissio
Fully agree Partially agree
The comparability of the lobby costs is poor. The Imethodology fully agree with the principles
of how to and standards of behaviour established in the
On financial issues it is No opinion A possible measure to No the
help opinion
judging procedure it would be the audio recor
calculate them is unclear. The full-time equivalent figure of people is not
The quality is good (if it Fully agree
used in practice, and only the persons involved figure appears in "studies" Partially agree
and some media articles.Fully Thisagree
is potentially distorting and leads to Fully agree
inflated and inaccurate figures. Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree
AmCham EU takes note Fully tha agree Partially agree
Fully agree No opinion
The overall data quality No opinion No opinion
Fully agree No opinion
It is difficult to compar Disagree The register does not neDisagree
The comparability of dat Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree

We believe that in order to achieve good quality data across the board, registered parties need to upload and update relevant
Fully agree Partially agree
Die deutschen Rechtsanwlte unterliegen ihrem eigenen strengen Berufsrech
Zu beachten ist auch, dass das Berufsrecht der Rechtsanwlte dem Verhalte
No opinion Disagree

Fully agree No opinion

Dans certains pays, tels Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree Fully agree

Fully agree No opinion unterliegen ihrem eigenen strengen Beru


Die sterreichischen Rechtsanwlte
Most registrants seem seFully agree In
Zu addition
beachten
Ces donnes pourraient tre heureusement compltes par des informationsto the
ist adhesi
auch, Partially
dass das agree
Berufsrecht
relatives der Rechtsanwlte
notamment aux exigencesdem Verhalte
de dontolo
Disagree
Le cas des avocats est particulirement Frcaractre
reprsentatif
Le den
cetVerhaltenskodex
gard.
contraignantDisagree
des Transparenzregisters
pourrait tre renforc par gibt
une es ferner keine ordnu
communication plus
Ces donnes supplmentaires Partiallypermettraient
agree tant D'une
aux institutions
manire gnrale,
qu'aux utilisateurs
Partially
un dispositif
agree
du de
Registre,
"porterde
connaissance"
mieux apprciersystmatiqu
la crdibi
Fully agree Partially agree
It is difficult to gauge the overall data quality as the register does not allowNo
No opinion foropinion
the relevant search queries necessary for useful
The comparability
From of the Fully
individual searches agreethat the data quality is sometimes questionable,
it is clear Partially agree
as stakeholders might be withholding deta
Considering the limited amountFully agree
of validity checks carried out by the EU institutions
No opinion it is impossible to make any assumptions a

Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree
Die Verstndlichkeit der Angaben im Register sollte dringend verbessert werden, um Fehlinterpretationen und reputationssch
Fully agree No opinion
Die Vergleichbarkeit der Fully
Datenagree Fully
im Register sollte dringend gestrkt werden. agree
Dazu sind insbesondere unklare Vorgaben wie zu
In 2015, Transparency International
FullySinn
agree complained to
The
theCode
Secretariat
of Conduct
aboutcovers
4253 registrations
many
Partially important
agree (around
pointshalf
although
the register
someentries)
key phras
w
Damit Transparenzvorgaben machen, mssen sie fr alle Organisationen gleichermaen gelten: Nichtregierungsorganisa
Fully agree No opinion
The investigatory and enforcement powers of theThe Secretariat,
Code of along
Conduct withshould
adequate
also human
prohibitresources,
representation
needbyto private
be transformed
firms of th
Although the overall dataFully agree No opinion
Particular priority should Fully agree to ensuring Athe
be allocated further
accuracy
concern
of the
is that Partially
financial dataagree
the Code within
of Conduct
registrations
is too indirectly
and software
linkedcould
to theeas
sy
we do not use the regist Fully agree The Code of Conduct covers many important points although some importan
No opinion
Partially agree Disagree
The Code of Conduct should prohibit the representation by private firms (inclu
Fully agree Fully agree
Transparency International has estimated that over
Thehalf
Code
of the
of Conduct
entries onshould
the lobby
alsoregister
prohibit contain
the representation
factual errors
byor
private
implausible
firms

The human resources and


Partially
software
agree
capacity devoted
Breaches
to theofEU
thelobby
Coderegister,
of Disagree
Conduct
as well
should
as itsbeinvestigatory
more readilyand
sanctioned;
enforcement
see po
be
No opinion No opinion

Fully agree No opinion


It should be ensured thatPartially agree Disagree

Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree


We expect that there coulFully agree Fully agree
Fully agree No opinion
As we only provide data Fully agree Fully agree
Partially agree Fully agree
No comment Fully agree No comment
La comparatibilidad de los costes de lobby es pobre. La metodologa de cmo Partially agree no es clara.
calcularlos
No creemos que la nueva Fully
guaagree
haya llevado a mejorar los costes que a las
Partially
entidades
agree
les supone el desarrollo de actividades
For some entities not all Fully agree No opinion
Die Vergleichbarkeit der Fully agree Fully agree
Sustaining trust implies Fully agree Further improvements can No opinion
Sustaining trust implies Fully agree Further improvements can No opinion
It relies on the quality Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree No opinion


The overall data quality Fully agree Yes, it is. Partially agree

Fully agree Fully agree

Partially agree No opinion


Fully agree No opinion

Fully agree Fully agree


Fully agree Disagree
Fully agree
Transparency International has estimated that over CSE
halfsupports
of the entries Partially
the position
on theof Alteragree
lobby register
EU that:contain factual errors or implausible
Die Vergleichbarkeit der Fully agree Partially
The Code of Conduct should prohibit agree
the representation by private firms (inclu
As mentioned before, at Partially
least a fifth
agree
of the entries must be systematically checked
Disagreeevery year. An adequately staffed secretaria
Die Vergleichbarkeit der Fully agree Partially agree
Die Vergleichbarkeit de Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree No opinion

Nach wie vor sind die g Fully agree Partially agree

Partially agree Partially agree


Au-del du problme de Fully agree La Fdration bancaire frNo opinion

Informationen ber im R Fully agree No opinion


Fully agree Disagree
The lack of guidance leads to misinterpretations, misunderstandings and errors in many entries in the Register. For small-scale
Though the quality of th Fully agree No opinion
Simplification and clarification,
Fully agree
on both the purposes of the Register and on
Disagree
what is expected from registrants, will help organis
There are exceptions, but Fully agree Partially agree
While we believe that som Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Please see the formal coPartially agree The Code of Conduct shou Disagree

- The Code of Conduct covers many important points although some importa
Fully agree No opinion
- Breaches of the Code of Conduct should be more readily sanctioned.
We are not sure everyone Fully agree For more information, see: No opinion
Without prejudice
Unfortunately, the of refi Partially
current situationagree A more precise
can only be describes approach Partially
c of theagree
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%
as "poor", because insufficient funding of the EU lobby registe
If thequality
The EU institutions
of data inwant
thePartially
to win back
Register agree
the trust
appears of uneven.
to be http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/press/release.faces/en/63655/html.boo
European Citizens,
This it is an
is perhaps Disagree
important
to be part
expected to have
given an efficient
the large number control over the
and varied na
Fully agree Fully agree

The fact that the Trasnp Fully agree Partially agree


The data is good bot notFully agree The Code is good, but I tFully agree

Partially agree Le code de conduite conNo opinion


Der Verhaltenskodex deckt viele wichtige Punkte ab, obwohl einige wichtige B
Transparency International schtzt, dass ber die Hlfte der Eintrge im Transparenzregister faktische Fehler oder implausible
Partially agree No opinion
Entsprechend der Framework Convention on Tobacco Control der World Hea
Sowohl der Personalbestand und die Softwarekapazitten die fr das Register aufgewendet werden als auch die Untersuchun
Analysis e.g. by TranspaPartially agree Der Verhaltenskodex Disagree
The Code of Conduct ist des
could Weiteren
be improved zu to
indirekt mit dem
strengthen theSanktionssystem
obligations of lobbv
I don't know
Weiterhin the register
bleiben AkteureNodem
opinion I don't know
Register fern. Im groen the dies
Stil sind register No opinion
Anwaltskanzleien, die Lobbyarbeit betreiben. ALTER-EU
NGOs such as ALTER EU Partially agree
and Transparency International
Breacheshaveof theregularly Disagree
Code ofhighlighted
Conduct should
the flaws
be more
in thereadily
data contained
sanctioned.
in the
Thistran
wo
Fully agree Disagree
We believe that more resources
Partiallyneed
agreeto be provided
In addition,
to the EU changes
transparency
to the
Disagree
codes
register
of secretariat,
conduct for soMEPs
that and
theyEU
areofficials
better able
shoulto
Comments or suggestions
b) Do
(Optional)
you think that theComments
names of organisations
or suggestions
4.1that
How
(Optional)
are
user-friendly
suspendedisunder
in your
theopinion
alerts and
thecomp
Regis

Yes Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Yes Straightforward

Cualquier ciudadano no Y
s es No opinion

Yes Satisfactory but can be


No Satisfactory but can be

Yes Cumbersome

Yes No opinion

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Yes Straightforward
No opinion Satisfactory but can be

Yes Satisfactory but can be


No Not in first instance. Bu No opinion
Yes No opinion

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward

No opinion Straightforward

No Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
No Die jeweilige BeschwerdStraightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward

Transparency!!
Yes Straightforward
as a civilian it s impossi Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion

No opinion Straightforward

No opinion No opinion

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Yes It is crucial that there No opinion
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes At present the lobby reg Straightforward

Yes Cumbersome
No opinion Straightforward

Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward

Yes No opinion
Yes Straightforward
No Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
No Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Deben estar ms argum Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward

Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
No Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Defina-se "erros de fact Yes Satisfactory but can be
No opinion Straightforward

Yes No opinion
Tout dpend de l'usage qYes publiques et sanctionn No opinion
Yes Straightforward

Yes Cumbersome
Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward
No Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward

No the principle of the pre Straightforward

No No opinion
No opinion Publicarea sa se faca, duStraightforward
Yes Straightforward
It should be meticoulouslYes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be

No Il suffit
Es solltedeeiner
leur interdi Cumbersome
Organisation, die mglicherweise aufgrund von Nichtwissen, a
No Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Si ma rendendo note le Straightforward

No Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes name and shame wrde Straightforward
d
Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward
No Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
No not until they are proved Straightforward
Yes Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be


No opinion Straightforward

Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be

No opinion Straightforward
No Satisfactory but can be
Yes Cumbersome
The current system is 'p Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Satisfactory but can be
No Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Yes Absolument. Le risque de
Straightforward

Yes Cumbersome
Yes Straightforward
No opinion Satisfactory but can be
Yes Cumbersome
Yes We are taking about tra No opinion

Yes No opinion
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
No Satisfactory but can be

Yes aber erst nach Abschlus Cumbersome

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Yes Straightforward
Yes what would be the point Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes No opinion

No opinion Das hngt von der Schwe


Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Its a transparency regist Satisfactory but can be


Yes Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be

No opinion Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Peut-tre selon un bar Straightforward

Yes No opinion
Pas de "vritable" contr Yes Naming and Shaming, crd
No opinion

Yes Cumbersome
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes No opinion
This is the first time I Yes Straightforward

No No opinion

Yes No opinion
Yes Satisfactory but can be

No opinion Straightforward

Yes No opinion
Yes But only after an accounStraightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward

Yes No opinion

Yes Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes No opinion
No No disclosure should be No opinion

Yes No opinion

No opinion Straightforward

Yes Straightforward

Voraussetzung, die Mel Yes No opinion

Yes No opinion

often to late to react, al Yes always be transparent witSatisfactory but can be


THIS SHOULD BE A LAW
Yes
!! honestly these questionsStraightforward

No Straightforward

No opinion Cumbersome
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion

Yes Straightforward

Yes E devem ser irradiados. Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Yes Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Yes Straightforward

Yes Names should be disclose


Straightforward

No Debiera hacerse pblico Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward

There should be a more Y


ces There needs to be someStraightforward
k
Yes Straightforward
No Suspensions could be mad
Straightforward

No No, because sometimes Straightforward


a

No Existe una gran diferencSatisfactory but can be

Yes No opinion
No Straightforward

Yes Im Hinblick auf die gew No opinion


No opinion The publication should Straightforward

The procedure for dealinYes Straightforward

No opinion Satisfactory but can be


Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward

Yes On the understanding thaSatisfactory but can be

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes No opinion

Yes Straightforward
Yes No opinion

Yes Satisfactory but can be


No the complaint shall be a No opinion

No A blaming/shaming apprSatisfactory but can be

Yes Satisfactory but can be


No opinion No opinion
Yes Satisfactory but can be
No opinion It depends if these org Straightforward

Yes It should be made clear Satisfactory but can be


Yes Satisfactory but can be

No Straightforward

Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
Yes Depends on the severity No opinion

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Yes No opinion

Yes No opinion

Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward

As doctor of law, I strong believe that first of all is necessary to have some gr
It is easy to complain a Yes If finally some organization
Satisfactory
have to bebutsuspended,
can be that organization need to
Yes Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward

Yes Straightforward

Yes No opinion

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Satisfactory but can be

The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the general maintenance of the register is far from adequate an

Currently, the only real sanction


Yes available to the lobby
Yes, this
register
is absolutely
authorities
c is
Satisfactory
removal from
but the
canregister.
be This is an important san
The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the general maintenance of the register is far from adequate an
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Currently, the only real sanction available to the lobby register authorities is removal from the register. This is an important san
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Yes, they should be madStraightforward
Yes Straightforward

Yes No opinion

Yes Straightforward
No way of getting to pri Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward

No opinion Straightforward

Yes Straightforward

No opinion No opinion

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Die EU-Institutionen sol No Dem vorbergehenden Aus


Straightforward

Yes Cumbersome
The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the general maintenance of the register is far from adequate. Th
Yes Straightforward
Currently, the only real sanction available to the lobby register authorities is removal from the register and this can only occur i

Meanwhile, a future legally-binding lobby register should implement a system of fines and criminal prosecutions for serious bre
Yes Yes, this is absolutely c No opinion
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Need to say why but thisStraightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Sofern die Meldungen unNo Cumbersome

No opinion We agree that the namesStraightforward


Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
No opinion No opinion
Yes Straightforward

Nur, weil jemand in RechYes Bldeste Frage berhaupt.


No opinion

Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Satisfactory but can be

No opinion Straightforward

Yes No opinion

Yes Cumbersome

No Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward

Yes No opinion
Yes Satisfactory but can be

There should be more folYes Satisfactory but can be

Yes No opinion
Yes Straightforward

Yes The fact that you even aNo opinion


Yes Straightforward

Yes No opinion

We have no experience Yes Only breaches which have


Straightforward

We have no experience w
Yes Only once the breac hasStraightforward

Yes No opinion

Die Beweislast liegt lei Yes Cumbersome


Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes No opinion
Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward
We would like to see a sYes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward

Feitelijk kan alleen de lobbyist of de parlementarir of EU-bestuurder een melding en/of klacht indienen. Anderen kunnen geen
Benvloeding met onjuiste Yes Straightforward
informatie dient fors bestraft te worden. Bijvoorbeeld door toegang te weigeren tot de EU gebouwen
De procedure is dus ontoereikend.
Yes Er moeten duidelijke sa Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Sofern die Meldungen und
No Cumbersome

Toute violation de la nor Yes Essentiel ! Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be

No opinion No opinion

not enough resources it Yes Satisfactory but can be


Yes Satisfactory but can be

No opinion Satisfactory but can be

Wie bereits unter 2.4. dargestellt wurde, ist das Registersekretariat derzeit personell nicht ausreichend ausgestattet, so dass n
Yes Straightforward
So in Zukunft Termine mitYes
EntscheidungstrgerInnenDie BAK
nur mehr
schliet
nachsich
Eintrag
d Straightforward
in das Register mglich sein sollten (wie in diesem

No Straightforward

No The names should be maSatisfactory but can be


No Disclosure after procedurStraightforward

No Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward

No Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Yes Satisfactory but can be
While Alerts are fine, No There should be no suspStraightforward

Nu am o mare experienYes Pe lng bune practici t Straightforward


Yes Straightforward

No Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward

No Satisfactory but can be

No opinion Straightforward
Yes Straightforward

Yes Cumbersome

Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
No Satisfactory but can be

No opinion Satisfactory but can be

Yes Cumbersome

No Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
How can a false alert b No In Germany someone is Straightforward
no
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
No opinion Cumbersome

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward
No Satisfactory but can be
No Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
No Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward

No It depends on the gravit Straightforward

Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes No solamente los nombre
Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Cumbersome

Yes Straightforward
No Nyilvnossgra hozatal Straightforward
Yes Straightforward

No opinion Straightforward
No Satisfactory but can be

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Yes Cumbersome
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward

No opinion Satisfactory but can be


No No opinion
Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Yes This is again transparen Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward
No Straightforward

The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the general maintenance of the register is inadequate and the C

Currently, the only real sanction


Yes available to the lobby register authorities is
Satisfactory
removal from
but the
canregister.
be This is an important san
No opinion Satisfactory but can be

No Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be

No Straightforward

Yes No opinion
Yes Straightforward
Access should be free, oNo We are concerned that teStraightforward
Yes No opinion
No Satisfactory but can be
The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the generalNo
Yes opinion
maintenance of the register is far from adequate an
No Cumbersome
No opinion
Currently, the only real sanction Straightforward
available to the lobby register authorities is removal from the register. This is an important san
The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the general maintenance of the register is far from adequate. Th
Yes Yes, this is absolutely c Satisfactory but can be
Yes
Currently, the only real sanction Satisfactory
available to the lobby register authorities is but the
removal from canregister
be and this can only occur i
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes
Meanwhile, a future legally-binding lobby registerLa pubblicazione
should implementdelle s Straightforward
a system of fines and criminal prosecutions for serious bre
Yes Yes, this is absolutely c Straightforward

No Straightforward
Yes This would create an ince
Satisfactory but can be
No But access to the reasons
Cumbersome
No Cumbersome

No Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the general maintenance of
the register is far from adequate and the Commission should significantly boost the
resources devoted to the register.
Currently, the only real sanction available to the lobby register authorities is removal from
the register. This is an important sanction, but also a blunt one that can only be applied in
limited circumstances. Under the current rules, those who have been shown to post
inaccurate information face no real penalty and can maintain their European Parliament
Yes
access passes or hold meetings Der Ausschluss
with commissioners. einer reif Straightforward
This must change citizens are to
have confidence in the system. Submitting inaccurate and / or misleading Satisfactory
Yes but can be
information must
be specified as an offence and new sanctions should Yes, be
thisintroduced
is absolutely
suchcrucial
as theastemporary
the threat of bad publicity from suspension s
suspension of lobby 'privileges'.
Yes further incentive to keep Satisfactory
registrationsbut
andcan
databeup to date.
In practice, it is import No opinion Cumbersome

No Satisfactory but can be


No Satisfactory but can be

Die EU-Institutionen sol No Dem vorbergehenden Aus


Straightforward
No Satisfactory but can be

No Satisfactory but can be


No Satisfactory but can be
No Satisfactory but can be

No opinion Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be


No opinion Satisfactory but can be
No Straightforward

No "In dubio pro reo" Satisfactory but can be

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Yes The reason should be shNo opinion

Die derzeitigen MeldemeYes Die Verffentlichung de No opinion


No Disclosing the names of Satisfactory but can be
No Principle that one is inn Straightforward

Yes Straightforward

No Complaints should only bStraightforward


No Name and shame is not S a traightforward
Yes The reason(s) for suspe Straightforward
The EU institutions shouNo The temporary exclusionStraightforward
he only one sanction avaYes This data should be keptStraightforward
No Satisfactory but can be

Als Normalbrger erfahr Yes No opinion

No Cumbersome

No opinion Straightforward
Unregistered lobbyists s Yes No opinion
Yes Yes, this is absolutely c Straightforward

No opinion No opinion
No opinion Satisfactory but can be

Yes Cela fait partie de la tr Satisfactory but can be


No sauf rcidives et fraudesStraightforward

No Straightforward

Die EU-Institutionen sol No Ein vorbergehender Auss


Straightforward

Yes It depends on the procedStraightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be


I have never been confroNo opinion Straightforward
No opinion Satisfactory but can be

Yes Satisfactory but can be

Grayling has never beenNo It can cause significant Straightforward


No opinion Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be

No opinion Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
which are higher than the declared turnover. So more than half of the new entries again raise

concerns not much seems to have changed in terms of the underlying systematic issues.

This clearly shows the need for more systematic checks and verification. For this it is key to set-up a

proper monitoring system for registrations and ensure


Transparency
independent
International
oversightstrongly
and duesupports
process.making public names of organis
No opinion Straightforward
Organisations that do not play by the rules need to
suspended
be sanctioned.
under the alerts and complaints procedure. This would both cons

In order to overcome this problem, we suggest setting-up incentiveatoproper handlemonitoring


entries with system
due diligence
for and allow public monitoring of t
The EU institutions shouNo A human error could be tStraightforward
registrations and using technologyYes to alleviate theunregistered
burden on human organisations.
resources. An increase in
Straightforward
Si on tient compte
Improvements need detolabeYes
made in both the procedure Une fois itselfla as
plainte
well asou inl'aproviding
Straightforward
the JTRS with more resources to complete
resources
The currentformonitoring
the JTRS capacity
as well as
Yes of better
the JointuseTransparency
of technology
Public naming to identify
Register andSecretariat
shaming
bad Straightforward
declarations
of not
is those isorganisations
needed.
sufficient to check that do anot
even playportion
small by the oru
No opinion Cumbersome
It is important
Having submittedthat 4,254
the body overseeing
complaints the register
in September strongest
and we
2015 administering
sanction
have gatheredthesanctions
secretariat
extensiveis independent.
has at its disposal.
experience with the The entries ofmechanis
complaints sanctione
Yes Straightforward
The High Authority for780 No opinion in Public Lifeshould
Transparency in France be marked
could our
serve
and Satisfactory
previous
as a model forbutthecan
suspensions EUbe
or sanctions should beinlisted on
In comparison to the organisations that were dealt with under complaint, 1,619 organisations had registered the me
This clearly shows the need for more systematic checks Transparency and verification.
International For strongly
this it is supports
key to set-up
makinga proper
publicmonitoring
names of organis
system
We fully to
agree that anyone should be
weablethattoone
make a complaint about factual errors and more serious andinstances
using of
transparency regime. This
Nowould
opinionmean body
entry isoninthecharge
register.
of the
The different
current elements
practise
Straightforward of deleting organisations non-compli
from thetop
In order
While overcome
the CCBE agreesthis problem,
that the Code suggest
of conduct setting-up
is basedaon proper
a soundmonitoring system
set of rules andfor registrations
principles, the procedure technology
for its enforce
Informationen
It is important thatim TranspNo
the body overseeing the register Dieand
Public Verffentlichung
naming
administering m
and shaming Straightforward
sanctions ofisthose
independent.
organisations
The Highthat Authority
do not play forby
Transp
the ru
The most serious
transparency and breach under the transparency
ethics:Yes
overseeing registers
the lobby register,
register codethey
receiving
when of conduct
complaints would
violateSatisfactory
rules
and or indo
givingthenotworst case
update scenario
should warrant the
be changed andorga
thos
We have
Under thenever filed a complaint
Interinstitutional or been
Agreement, targetedWe
violations bythe
of believe
one, Codethusthat
ofwe suspended
are notare
Conduct in aregistrations
position
both but
investigatedcan
to commentbe
shouldandbesanctioned
whether
made public it isby
adequate.
once the app
the Joint Tra
In contrast, the Office Yes
of the of
Registrar Straightforward
recommendations on cases conflictsofofConsultantWe of Lobbyists
interestshould fullybe
MEPs agree
and inCommissioners,
that
the the
displayed UK names
withhas theof power
organisations
a suspended
keeping to the
impose
or suspended
civil label,
deleted and criminal
should sanctions
including bethe
made
detaipin
Furthermore, the enforcement No authority should have Suspension
sufficientbefore
resources a finato
Nomonitor
opinioncompliance with the regulatory framework
Of course,
expert group a strong system
and revolving Nodoor
opinion
of sanctions
registers,would only
This
publishing work
longer procedure
and ifmonitoring
havethearegister
is clearly
current was No
laid
declarationsopinion
mandatory
out of
registration. alongside
This therefore
interest
wouldtheallow
and PRCA
a mandatory
Code of
a public system
Conduct
record ofalong
andoff
past wim
Yes No opinion
ass Yes a stronger deterrent for current Satisfactory
registrants.
but can be
Improvements
The present system need for
to be madewith
dealing in both theand
alerts procedure itselfand
complaints as the
wellgeneral
as in providing
maintenancethe JTRS
of thewith more is
register resources to complete
far from adequate an
The current monitoring capacity of the Joint Transparency Register Secretariat is not sufficient to check even a small portion o
Currently, the only real sanction
Yes available to the lobby
Oxfamregister
stronglyauthorities
supportsis
Satisfactory
removal from but the
canregister.
be This is an important san
Having
The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the general maintenance of the register is complaints
In submitted
practice, it is 4,254
import complaints
No opinion in September 2015 we have gathered extensive
Cumbersome experience with the mechanis
far from adequate. Th
Currently, the only real sanction available to the lobby register authorities is removal from the register and this can only occur i
In comparison to thelegally-binding
780Yes
organisations that were Yes,
dealt with
isunder our complaint, 1,619andorganisations had registered in the me
Meanwhile, a future lobby register should
this implement
absolutely
a system
c Satisfactory
of fines but can
criminal
be prosecutions for serious bre
This clearly shows the need for more systematic checks Transparency
and verification.
International
For strongly
this it is supports
key to set-up
makinga proper
publicmonitoring
names of organis
system
Yes Cumbersome
In order to overcome this problem, we suggest setting-up a proper monitoring system for registrations and using technology to
It is important that the body Yesoverseeing the register Public
and naming
administering No opinion
and shaming
sanctions ofisthose
independent.
organisations
The High
that Authority
do not playforby
Transp
the ru

Yes Satisfactory but can be


No
Die Abgrenzung zu reinen Denunziation ist schwierig. Concernant
Soweit
Anonyme les
ein Versto alertes il Satisfactory
Meldungen/Beschwerden
zweifelsfrei but can
nachgewiesen sindbe
unakzeptabel.
ist, unter Angabe der Grnde f
Sowohl
Es gibt keine bergeordnete Beschwerdestelle bei Missstnden im EU-Transparenzregister.auf
"whistleblower" als
Yesauch beschuldigte Organisationen
Ungerechtfertigtes
haben "whistle
Anspruch Satisfactory
blowing"
auf gerechte
sollte
but canBehandlung
be
Die dieselbe
Beamten Weise
und
desSchutz
ffentlich
gegen
EU-Transparengemaun
Zum Beispiel hat die international
No ttige NGO-Organisation
die stndigeVerein
Rechtsprec
zur Frderung
Straightforward
der Vlkerverstndigung (Society for the Adv
No opinion Although we have no clear opinion on the issue, we can nevertheless offer se
Straightforward
No We think
Maybe that
not as ifa ageneral
registrant is suspended
rSatisfactory but canfrombethe register during the investig
The procedures with respect
The complaint procedureNo opinionto alerts and complaints
However,
shouldonce
be treated
a decision
separately.
is
We believe it is sufficie Straightforwardtaken This
and is
a registrant
because these
is found
aretotwo
have
different
committe
typ
To make a clearer distinction between the two, weThere propose
are changing
several systems
the term where
alertpublication
to requestof forinfractions
clarification,
is allowed
as this albeit
phrasein
At the moment, the procedure for requests for clarification
- the name
(alerts)of and
the economic
the procedure operator
for complaints
concerned;are carried out by the Tran
With the register becoming No mandatory,
opinion an investigation
- the
into
exclusion
an organisations
situation No (...);
opinion
alleged misconduct will become even more signi
Yes agreement does not- always
The current inter-institutional the duration
specify the of the No
timeexclusion opinion
limits in which
and/orthe theinformation
amount of has the financial
to be delivered
penalty.by
A registrant who receives a notification from the secretariat,
That same whether
article specifies
a request thefor circumstances
clarification (anin which
alert) orthea decision
complainttoagainst
publish
It is possible that the current
No opinion
shortcomings in handling
We would
requests
also for
referclarification
to the Straightforward
Opinion
(alerts)
of and
the European
complaintsData procedures
ProtectionareSupervis
a result
No Straightforward
Yes No opinion
Die EU-Institutionen sol No Dem vorbergehenden Aus Straightforward
Die EU-Institutionen sol No Dem vorbergehenden Aus Straightforward

No opinion Im Falle eines verpflich Straightforward

Yes Satisfactory but can be


Suspension from the Commission Register has attracted negative publicity and reputational damage to those affected. Compla
o an independent complaint body should consider potential suspensions and not the Register secretariat. SEAP volunteers
Improvements needmust
o the procedure to bebemade in both the procedure itself as well as in providing the JTRS with more resources to complete
confidential
The current monitoring capacity of the Joint Transparency
o more precision is needed on admissibility Register Secretariat is not sufficient to check even a small portion o
and proportionality
o the Respondent must be able to see the complaint file in full
Having
o thesubmitted 4,254
system may complaints
need
Yes in September
to be adapted 2015however
for individuals.
Yes, we havepublishing
gatheredStraightforward
extensive experience with the complaints mechanis

In comparison to the 780 organisations that were dealt with under our complaint, 1,619 organisations had registered in the me
This clearly shows the need No for more systematic checks and verification. For Straightforward
this it is key to set-up a proper monitoring system
Yes
In order to overcome this problem, we suggest setting-upTransparency a proper Straightforward
International
monitoringstrongly
systemsupports
for registrations
making and
public
using
names
technology
of organis
to
More staff would
It is important thatbethe
nee Yesoverseeing the register
body See ouradministering
and answer to questStraightforward
sanctions is independent. The High Authority for Transp
Yes Public naming and shaming Satisfactory
of thosebut organisations
can be that do not play by the ru
No opinion Satisfactory but can be
The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the general maintenance of the register is far from adequate an
Currently, the only real sanction available to the lobby register authorities is removal from the register. This is an important san
Under the current rules, those Yes who have been shown to post inaccurate information Straightforward
face no real penalty and can maintain thei
Die EU-Institutionen sol No Dem vorbergehenden Auss Straightforward
Il
We y a un manque d'inform
theYes Il serait intressant d' ourStraightforward
Die would like to see
EU-Institutionen dueaktiv
sollten process
eine strengthened.
Compliance-Kultur
Dem Asvorbergehenden
consultancies, members
frdern. Es ist darauf
Ausschluss are
hinzuwirken, verydass
knnte dependent
ein on their
menschlicher reputation
Fehler zugrundein
Ideally, the JTRS would have
Yes the capacity to review
The
Registereintrge im Einklang mit den Transparenzleitlinien data
answer
before
harte Strafe, is
stehen,given
it was with
published.
Satisfactory
da infolgedessen but
d.h. die bereitgestellten can be
effektive Interessenvertretung
Informationen gegenber den
Die
nachEU-Institutionen
bestem Wissensol No
vollstndig, aktuell und nichtDem
mehr vorbergehenden
irrefhrend
mglichsind.
ist. Die Aus
Straightforward
DasVerffentlichung
gegenwrtige Ungleichgewicht
eines vorbergehenden Ausschlusses
mindert die Vergleichbarkeit, No opinion
schadet dem politischen
reputationsschdigende
Ziel der Transparenz Cumbersome
Wirkung
und fhrtund zuwre
einemimeinseitigen
Falle eines vorbergehenden A
Blaming derer, die sich No den Leitlinien entsprechend
verhltnismig.
verhalten. Straightforward
Yes Une publication des sancStraightforward

ESTA has never filed a cYes Suspended registrations Straightforward

No Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be

Improvements need
Keine Erfahrung to be
mit dem Nomade in both the procedure itself as well as in Aus
Dem vorbergehenden providing the JTRS with more resources to complete
Straightforward
The current monitoring capacity
No of the Joint Transparency Register Secretariat is not sufficient
Satisfactory but can beto check even a small portion o

Having submitted 4,254 complaints in September 2015 we have gathered extensive experience with the complaints mechanis

The
In present system
comparison to thefor
780 Yes
dealing with alerts
organisations thatand complaints
were dealt withand the our
under general No opinion
maintenance
complaint, of the registerhad
1,619 organisations is far from adequate
registered an
in the me
This clearly shows the need for more systematic checks Transparency
and verification.
International
For strongly
this it is supports
key to set-up
making
a proper
publicmonitoring
names of organis
system
Currently,
In order tothe only realthis
overcome sanction
Yes available
problem, to thesetting-up
we suggest lobby
Yes, this
register
aisproper
absolutely
authorities
c is
Noremoval
monitoring opinion
systemfrom the register. This
for registrations is an important
and using technology san
to
It is important that the bodyYesoverseeing the registerPublic
and naming
administering
and shaming
sanctions
Satisfactory
ofisthose
independent.
but
organisations
can beThe High
that Authority
do not playforby
Transp
the ru
No opinion No opinion
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward

Yes Oui, absolument. Des saNo opinion


Improvements need to be made in both the procedure itself as well as in providing the JTRS with more resources to complete

The current monitoring capacity of the Joint Transparency Register Secretariat is not sufficient to check even a small portion o
EU Institutions should actively foster a culture of compliance. It should be ensured that all entries in the Register are complian
Yes
Having submitted 4,254 complaints in September 2015 we have gatheredNo opinion experience with the complaints mechanis
extensive
The Joint Transparency Register
Yes Secretariat staffing
Enforcement
should therefore
of rulesbe
sho
increased.
Straightforward
This would help to deploy effective enforce
In comparison to the 780Yes
organisations that were dealt with under our complaint, 1,619but
Satisfactory organisations
can be had registered in the me

This clearly shows the need for more systematic checks and verification. For this it is key to set-up a proper monitoring system

In order to overcome this problem, we suggest setting-up


Transparency
a proper
International
monitoringstrongly
systemsupports
for registrations
making and
public
using
names
technology
of organis
to
Yes Straightforward
It is important that the body overseeing the register
Public
and naming
administering
and shaming
sanctionsofisthose
independent.
organisations
The High
that Authority
do not play
forby
Transp
the ru
Yes Satisfactory but can be
No opinion Straightforward
Das aktuelle System, wie mit Meldungen und Beschwerden umgegangen wird und generell die Instandhaltung des Registers i
Yes Straightforward
UNI Europa fully supportYes
Momentan ist die einzige wirkliche Sanktionsmglichkeit das Entfernen aus Straightforward
dem Lobbyregister, was aber auch nur bei Nicht-K
Die EU-Institutionen sol No Registerangaben, die zuStraightforward
Ein zuknftiges gesetzlichYes
verpflichtendes Lobbyregister
Absolut sollte
notwendig.
ein SystemSatisfactory
an Strafen und
but can
strafrechtlicher
be Verfolgung fr Verst

Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
No opinion Satisfactory but can be

IEFPIA would
think the be supportiYes
procedure is fine. There's just one thing I don't understand and Straightforward
it is about the measures available in the event of non
I don't understand why, inYes Type of non-compliance number 2 (Non-cooperation Straightforward
with JTRS) the measure says: "Removal from
And in the number 3 case: Yes"Inappropriate behavior",
Whyit'snot?
exactly
Thatthe
would
same,
be Straightforward
I think this type of non-compliance is referring to ent
Yes Straightforward
In practice, it is important to distinguish between malicious or unjustified Satisfactory but can be
Yes UNESPA bilieves that ent
claims on the one hand, No andopinion
serious breaches of the code of conduct. Cumbersome
AmCham EU believes that Yest No suspension should beStraightforward
EFAMA does not have anYes Names of suspended orga Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Suspensions should occur Straightforward
No No opinion
The EU institutions shouNo A human error could be tStraightforward
No opinion Satisfactory but can be
No Satisfactory but can be

We have not made, nor have been subjected to any


We alert
believe
or complaint
that a decision
procedure.
shouldOur
only
comment
be madecan
public
therefore
once aonly
finaltheoreticall
determina
No opinion Straightforward
Die BRAK ist der Auffassung, dass die Namen von Einrichtungen, die im Zus

Das derzeitige Beschwerdeverfahren ist nach Auffassung


Ein vorbergehender
der BRAK nicht
Ausschluss
angemessen,
aus dem
da es
Register
keine unabhngige
erfolgt, wenn Entscheidun
eine registr
No No opinion

No opinion Satisfactory but can be

Yes Satisfactory but can be


No opinion The names of organisatioStraightforward
The situation today, with a couple of NGOs responsible L'instruction d'uneallplainte
for almost doit absolument
surveillance rester secrte,
and subsequent dans
complaints le respect
is not ideal. du
In terms
Der of complaints,
sterreichische itNo
is important to distinguish
Rechtsanwaltskammertag Le
istDer
dernon-respect
between
sterreichische
Ansicht, avr
frivolous
dass dasorde Straightforward
type 4 (Non-coopration
unjustified
Rechtsanwaltskammertag
derzeitige Kontroll- undist rpte et dlibre
Sanktionsregime
der Ansicht, dass nicht
eineou com
ange
Ver
claims
Das on the
Sekretariat one hand,
des Yes
and claims triggered
Transparenzregisters ist by serious
The
zurzeit Cefic
breaches
answer
Anklger bei of
is the
given
code
VerstenS atisfactory
of conduct.
gegen but
den can be
Verhaltenskodex
D'une manire gnrale, un dispositif de "porter connaissance" systmatique des suites donnes aux carts de certaines en des Transparenzre
Es sollte
Bien que dementsprechend
la procdure mise No eine unabhngige
en uvre Instanz
ne paraisse Ein
pasvorbergehender
eingerichtet
constituer une werden,
Ausschluss
Nodie
procdureopinion
frdisciplinaire
die
ausMelde-
dem Register
undsens
au Beschwerdeverfahren
erfolgt,
propre wenn
de ce eine registr
terme, einsc
mai
A dfaut, l'autorit de mise Yesen uvre exposerait certainement
La publicit de terme,
la sancti la Straightforward
Commission des recours.
No opinion Las medidas tienen que Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
In practice, it is impor No opinion Cumbersome
No opinion No opinion

No opinion Satisfactory but can be


No opinion Satisfactory but can be
Yes Satisfactory but can be
No Satisfactory but can be
International Standards for
NoLobbying Transparency require ade
Il convient complaint mechanism
distinguer that allows anyone to report violations eith
Straightforward

Whilst the EU Transparency Register currently allows for complaints to beCumbersome


Notoopinion made, the Secretariats lack of resources means tha
Including a sound chance correct its registration is important not to scare smaller actors from signing up and establishing co
No Menschliche Fehler knne Straightforward
For citizens to have confidence in the system, the Secretariat should act where breaches of the register are found and dissuad
Yes secretariat should be
It is our view that the register Yes, assuming
granted morethat the aStraightforward
recourses to increase its capacity to ensure they can properl
Yes Satisfactory but can be
A legally-binding lobby register would help to remedy such problems by enabling the implementation of sanctions such as fines
We don't have scrutinizeYes Of course this depends: Satisfactory but can be
Yes The names of organisatioStraightforward
No Until a complaint has be Straightforward
The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the general maintenance of the register is far from adequate an

Currently, the only real sanction


Yes available to the lobby
Yes, this
register
is absolutely
authorities
c is
Satisfactory
removal from
but the
canregister.
be This is an important san
No Any sanctions should notSatisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward
The procedure for dealinYes Satisfactory but can be

Irish Funds does not ha Yes Straightforward

Yes Straightforward
No We are concerned that te
Satisfactory
Registration to the TR requires butinformation
detailed can be that may prove difficult to
No opinion Straightforward
Yes We think itInsurance
However, should beEurope
maStraightforward
believes that entities registered in the TR should
Yes Satisfactory but can be
We are concerned that thYes Satisfactory but can be
Entendemos que este pro No Creemos que no deberaStraightforward
Yes Straightforward
No Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
Yes Yes, BUT only when backg Straightforward

No opinion Straightforward
The procedure is adequaYes Yes, the names of suspende
Satisfactory but can be

Yes Straightforward

AFA recognizes that the Transparency Register requires detailed information


Yes However, we believe thatSatisfactory
entities registered
but caninbethe Transparency Registered s
No opinion Satisfactory but can be
Le CNB admet que le code de conduite sappuie sur un solide ensemble de rgles et de principes. Nanmoins, la procdure d

En vertu de laccord interinstitutionnel, les violations du code de conduite font la fois lobjet dune enqute et de sanctions de
Yes Straightforward
De plus, lautorit de mise
Yes
en uvre doit disposerLe deprincipe
ressources
devrait
suffisantes
tre Satisfactory
pour sassurer
but can
duberespect du cadre rglementaire
It is fundamental to pres No opinion Satisfactory but can be
Grundstzlich
The Commission ist darauf
has notNo Straightforward
allocated sufficient resources to deal with complaints, nor to check efficiently at least part of the entri
Yes This would be an importaSatisfactory but can be
Grundstzlich ist darauf No Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
Yes We agree that details shSatisfactory but can be
Yes Satisfactory but can be

Die EU-Institutionen sol No Menschliche Fehler sind Straightforward

Die Vereinte Dienstleis Yes Straightforward


Yes Straightforward
Das Registersekretariat ist derzeit personell nicht ausreichend ausgestattet, so dass nicht gewhrleistet ist,
dass die Eintrge regelmig Yes berprft werden knnen
Bei Versten
und die ist eine S Straightforward
eingelangte
Beschwerden zeitnah bearbeitet
Yes werden. List of suspended/banned
CEEP believes that the quality of the Transparency Register should rely less Straightforward
organisations from
on the external the Register
complaints andshall be made ava
denunciation, and
Yes In case of alert or complaint,
Straightforward
the status shall be made available also under th
Also, we believe
We would like to that onlyYes
see the an independent
due body, with
If anAs
process strengthened. aindependent
clear mandate body
consultancies, andwCumbersome
our appeal
members procedure
are veryset in place, on
dependent would
theirbe in position
reputation in
Ideally, the JTRS would have Yes the capacity to review
Thedata
answer
before
is given
it waswith
published.
Straightforward
DIGITALEUROPE believes Yest DIGITALEUROPE believes Satisfactory
t but can be
Yes The current Code of Cond Straightforward
The Commission has notYes a Satisfactory but can be

No opinion Satisfactory but can be

Yes On condition that the s Straightforward


It should
We refer be taken
to the into c Nomade by Alter-EU, i.e.:From
comments "The our pointsystem
present of view,for
aNo opinion
dealing with alerts and complaints and the general m
Currently, the only real sanction
No opinion
available to the lobby register authorities is
Noremoval
opinionfrom the register and this can only occur i
Yes Straightforward

As previously mentionedYes Straightforward


Yes No opinion

Yes Oui, car cela constituer Straightforward

Das aktuelle System, wieNo mitopinion


Meldungen und Beschwerden umgegangen Satisfactory wird, und generell
but candiebeInstandhaltung des Registers
Proposition n9 : Mettre en place une procdure gradue davertissements et de sanctions
Momentan
Une ist die
procdure deeinzige wirkliche
sanctions Sanktionsmglichkeit
est bienvenue, dasabus
afin dviter les Entfernen
et les aus dem Lobbyregister,
contournements was Cependant,
des rgles. aber auch nur bei consid
nous Nicht-K
The unit/body dealing
- Signalement wiYes signale des informations
: Un internaute See above. Satisfactory
quil considre errones. but candebeTransparence en informe lorg
Le Registre
I- don't
Ein know
zuknftiges
Enqute thelagesetzlich
: de registe
part desYesverpflichtendes
services du registre de as long sollte
Lobbyregister as entities
transparence ein aredun
System
partir Straightforward
an Strafen
certain fr Verste
nombre gegen die Regeln
de signalement des Regi
des avertisseme
- Publicit
As : partir
mentioned above,dun Yes
wecertain
believenombre Dies
davertissement,
that more ist eine wichtige
resources arepublication
required and I Satisfactory
desa avertissements,but
greater emphasis can be
etisdes erreurs
needed oncommises
checking data quality
- Suspension temporaireYes des droits lis au registre
Suite
de transparence
une procdure d Satisfactory but can be
We know from Transparency Yes International, who submitted
Only in this4,254
manner
complaints
can Satisfactory
about databutinaccuracies
can be in September 2015, that i
4.1 How user-friendly isComments
in your opinion
or suggestions
the Register
5.1 The
(Optional)
website
Europeanin relation
Parli5.1 to
Theregistration
European and
Parliupdating?: Updating proce

Cumbersome Somewhat important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be FOR SOME REGISTRANT
Very important Very important

No opinion Not important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Not important

Cumbersome Can't pass main page witSomewhat important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Not important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important


No opinion Somewhat important Somewhat important
No opinion Somewhat important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be improved No opinion Somewhat important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Not important Very important

No opinion Very important Somewhat important


Satisfactory but can be improved Not important Not important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Somewhat important Somewhat important


No opinion Very important Very important
No opinion Very important Very important

No opinion Somewhat important Somewhat important

No opinion No opinion No opinion

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important


No opinion Somewhat important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Very important

Cumbersome Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important


Straightforward Somewhat important Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important
Cumbersome Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Straightforward Not important Somewhat important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Not important Not important
Straightforward Somewhat important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Debe haber un apartadoVery
p important Very important

Straightforward No opinion Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward I always struggle to find Somewhat important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward No opinion Somewhat important

No opinion Very important Not important


No opinion Very important Very important
Straightforward Somewhat important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be Je crains qu'on ne peut pNo opinion Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


No opinion No opinion No opinion
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important

No opinion Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Straightforward Somewhat important Not important

Satisfactory but can be updating: make it every Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important


Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important


No opinion Very important Very important

Straightforward Somewhat important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important

Straightforward Somewhat important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important


Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Somewhat important Somewhat important
Straightforward Somewhat important Very important
Straightforward Somewhat important Very important
Straightforward Not important Not important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Straightforward Somewhat important No opinion

Straightforward Not important Very important

Straightforward Very important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Not important Somewhat important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Cumbersome Very important Very important
Straightforward Somewhat important Somewhat important

Straightforward Very important No opinion


Straightforward Somewhat important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important
Straightforward Somewhat important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important

Cumbersome Very important Somewhat important


Straightforward Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important
Cumbersome La lourdeur de l'enregis Very important Very important
No opinion Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Not important Very important
Satisfactory but can be pas toujours trs simple Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Not important Not important

Cumbersome Alle systeme die man seSomewhat important Not important

Straightforward Very important Somewhat important


Straightforward Very important Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Somewhat important Not important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Cumbersome No opinion Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Somewhat important

No opinion Somewhat important Somewhat important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Cumbersome Very important Somewhat important
Straightforward Somewhat important Very important

Cumbersome Somewhat important Very important

No opinion Somewhat important Very important


Straightforward Somewhat important Very important

No opinion Very important Somewhat important

No opinion No opinion No opinion


Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

No opinion No opinion No opinion


Straightforward Somewhat important Not important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important

No opinion Very important Very important

No opinion No opinion No opinion

Straightforward Not important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important

No opinion Somewhat important Very important


No opinion Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


No opinion dont care already too deSomewhat important Somewhat important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Cumbersome Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved No opinion No opinion
No opinion Somewhat important Very important
No opinion Very important Not important

Straightforward Not important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important


Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Registered entitities th Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward I initially missed the dis Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Not important


Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be Any registration and up Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

Cumbersome Very important Very important


No opinion Very important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


No opinion Somewhat important Very important

Satisfactory but can be Concerning the participatVery important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important


No opinion Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be Would be useful to be p Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Not important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Somewhat important Not important


Straightforward Very important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important
No opinion Somewhat important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important


No opinion Somewhat important Not important

No opinion Not important Somewhat important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be The Register have to chec


Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Somewhat important

No opinion Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

Straightforward Somewhat important Not important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward A good proportion of the Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved No opinion No opinion
Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved No opinion No opinion

Straightforward Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

Straightforward Somewhat important Somewhat important

Straightforward Unklare Vorgaben wie zur


Very important Very important

Cumbersome Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important

We suspect that a good proportion of the errors in the data posted on the lobby register are accidenta

Satisfactory but can be Furthermore, we consider


Very
thatimportant
the register would Very
be farimportant
more effective and precise if all registrants we
Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Very important

No opinion Es ist durchaus sinnvoll, Not importantzur Organisation


die Angaben Very important
einmal jhrlich verpflichtend zu aktualisieren. L
Cumbersome Komplettaktualisierung nicht
Not important
nachvollziehbar undNot
zustzlich
important
zeitaufwndig. Eine Teilaktualisierung sol

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Somewhat important Very important


No opinion Very important No opinion
Straightforward Somewhat important Very important

No opinion Not important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

Cumbersome No opinion No opinion

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important

No opinion Very important Somewhat important


Cumbersome Very important Very important

Cumbersome Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important


Straightforward Not important Not important

No opinion Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

Cumbersome Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

No opinion Somewhat important Very important


Cumbersome Somewhat important Not important

Straightforward Somewhat important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Somewhat important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Not important
Cumbersome Somewhat important Somewhat important
Cumbersome Es ist durchaus sinnvoll Not important Not important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important

No opinion Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important

Cumbersome Det br vre muligt at hVery important Somewhat important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Aus den bisherigen ErfahVery important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Straightforward Somewhat important Somewhat important

Straightforward Very important Not important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important


Cumbersome Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Not important


Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Not important


Straightforward Very important Very important
No opinion Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important

Cumbersome Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Not important

Straightforward Very important Somewhat important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Somewhat important Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved No opinion No opinion

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Somewhat important Somewhat important
Straightforward No opinion Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important
Cumbersome Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Somewhat important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important

Cumbersome Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Somewhat important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be Not particularly cumbersSomewhat important Somewhat important


No opinion Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important No opinion

Straightforward Somewhat important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Somewhat important


Straightforward No opinion Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be Developing a system thatVery important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Not important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Somewhat important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

No opinion No opinion No opinion


Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
No opinion Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be bilingual or multilingual Very important Very important
No opinion Die geforderten
A good proportionAngaben Somewhat
zu Finanzen
of the errors important
in the data postedVery
im Rahmen ondesimportant
Transparenzregisters,
the fhren
lobby register are likely to bebei der jhrlichen
accidental or in
Cumbersome Not important Not important
Straightforward Well implemented.
Furthermore, the registerSomewhat
would be farimportant Somewhat
more effective important
and precise if all registrants were required to sub
Satisfactory but can be Very important Not important
Cumbersome Keeping an own administr Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved
We suspect that a good proportion of the errors inSomewhat
Very important important
the data posted on the lobby register are accidenta
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Furthermore, we consider Very
thatimportant
the register would Very
be farimportant
more effective and precise if all registrants we

Straightforward Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be Make navigation easier Somewhat important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
A good proportion of the errors in the data posted on the lobby register are likely to be
accidental or inadvertent. The register's software could help identify and warn about
possible errors during the update process.
Straightforward Der Aufwand zur
Furthermore, the Aktuali
registerVery
wouldimportant Veryand
be far more effective important
precise if all registrants were
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very
required to submit at least two updates per year, and onimportant
shared dates ie. 31 January and
31 July. This would result in improved data which could be more easily compared.
No opinion Very important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be The Register should be aVery important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Unklare Vorgaben wie zur


Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be The registrant should be Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be Probably difficult to imp No opinion Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


No opinion Very important Somewhat important

No opinion Somewhat important Somewhat important


Satisfactory but can be Regarding the registrati Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Somewhat important Very important

Straightforward Not important Somewhat important


Straightforward Very important Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Unclear requirements asVery important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Cumbersome Somewhat important Very important

No opinion Somewhat important Somewhat important

Cumbersome Die verlangten Daten (v No opinion Somewhat important

Straightforward Very important Somewhat important


No opinion Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important

No opinion No opinion No opinion


Satisfactory but can be Le registre doit tre un Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Straightforward Il faudrait pouvoir sauve Somewhat important Very important

Satisfactory but can be Die Anforderungen bei dVery important Very important

Die erforderliche Aktualisierung der Daten im Transparenzregister erfordert groen brokratischen Au


Das Portal enthlt insbesondere keine Funktion fr eine Zwischenstandspeicherung, das heit, falls w
Cumbersome Ein weiteres gutes Beispiel
Very
istimportant
die Save the Draft Very
Funktion
important
am Ende dieser Konsultation.

Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be Sometimes, we can not cVery important Very important
Satisfactory but can be the email sent for the a Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Somewhat important Very important

Straightforward Somewhat important Somewhat important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
register should include automatic links to other registers, such as the lobby meetings of

Commissioners, the register of expert groups, the online database on EC grants, the database of

submissions to EC consultations and the list of EC staff and Commissioners having gone through

the revolving door. Linking this information automatically to the entries on the register largely
Satisfactory but can be Die Bundesarbeitsgemeins Very important Very important
improves the available information while not increasing the administrative burden of filling out

the registration.
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward There should be drop-down menus wherever
Very important possible (e.g. for
Somewhat EU initiatives worked on linked from
important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward EULex or the legislative observatory)
Not important Not important
Satisfactory but can be The Transparency Registe Very important Somewhat important
Automatic
Both in thealerts should
process be introduced
of registration and for the online
updating, the form of the Transparency Register. These
Straightforward Very important Veryintroduction
important of additional smart online measures
Der GDV nimmt die anlassbezogene Aktualisierung seiner Daten regelmig vor. Jedoch kann auch h
Satisfactory but can be improved
alerts Somewhat important No opinion
There should
should automatically
be drop-downflag
menuspotential mistakes
wherever and
possible misreporting.
(e.g. It shouldworked
for EU initiatives be impossible to from EU
on linked
Zudem
Automatic alerts should be introduced for the online form of the Transparency Register. These alertsffs
hat der GDV eine konkrete praktische Unzulnglichkeit festgestellt: Das Update der letzten
Straightforward report - under activitiesVery
and files worked on andNot
important an alarm should indicate when organisations
important
Satisfactory but can be These
Der GDV hat in dieser
changes shouldRubrik
Veryreduce
also important
angemerkt, dass for
the burden sich
Very
derimportant
the GDVtomit
JTRS einem
check onCompliance-Leitfaden
the declarations. bereits
Satisfactory but can be declare lobbying budgetsVery that important
would mean that their lobbyistsimportant
Somewhat receive less than a minimum
Straightforward Very important Very important
wage or make other obvious mistakes by declaring budgets far outside a reasonable range, for
No opinion Very important Very important
No opinion example. Very important Very important
No opinion No opinion No opinion
Satisfactory but can be These changes should also Veryreduce
important
the burden forSomewhat
the JTRS important
to check on the declarations.
Both in the process of registration and updating, the introduction of additional smart online measures

Satisfactory but can be Automatic alerts should beVery


introduced
importantfor the online
Somewhat
form of the
important
Transparency Register. These alerts s
Both in the process of registration and updating, the introduction ofonadditional smart online
Satisfactory but can be The Register should be a
Very important Somewhat
We suspect that a good proportion of the errors in the data postedimportant the lobby register aremeasures
accidenta
Furthermore, we consider that the register would be far more effective and precise if all registrants we
Satisfactory but can be There should bedata
drop-down
Verymenus wherever possible (e.g. for EU initiativesisworked oncompare
linked from
As a result, the posted, especially
important in the areaVery
of spending
important on lobbying, tricky to andEU
c
Automatic alerts should be introduced for the online form of the Transparency Register. These alerts s
Cumbersome Not important Not important
No opinion These changes should also Veryreduce
important
the burden forVery
the important
JTRS to check on the declarations.

Satisfactory but can be notamment pour lechargmentVery important


de pices jointes : ilSomewhat importanttous les formats
faudarait autoriser
Satisfactory but can be la
Jede Aktualisierung sollte auch die Besttigigung aller Datenimportant
temporaisation est trop
Very
courte
important
aussi ... coupureSomewhat
au-dela de 20 minutes ..
erhalten.
Cumbersome Die zum Jaherstag der Ersteintragung
Very importantvorgeschriebene
Very important
Aktualisierung knnte dann als berflssige F
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Very important

No opinion No opinion No opinion


No opinion Somewhat important Somewhat important
Die Anforderungen bei der Aktualisierung, insbesondere welche Daten erforderlich sind oder inwiefern
Straightforward Verywerden
bestimmte Daten angepasst important
mssen, sindVery important
nicht immer eindeutig. Insofern wren genauere
Satisfactory but can be individuelle Hinweise wnschenswert.
Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be Unklare Vorgaben wie zuVery important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be It would be good that whVery important Very important
Straightforward Both in the process of registration and updating, the
Very important Veryintroduction
important of additional smart online measures
There should be drop-down menus wherever possible (e.g. for EU initiatives worked on linked from EU
Straightforward Very
Automatic alerts should be importantfor the online
introduced Very important
form of the Transparency Register. These alerts s
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important
Straightforward Veryreduce
These changes should also important
the burden forVery
the important
JTRS to check on the declarations.
Satisfactory but can be Very important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward the register would be fa Very important Not important


Straightforward Unklare oder irrefhrendVery important Very important
Straightforward La procdure d'enregistre Very important Very important
Unklare Vorgaben wie zur Berechnung von Mitgliedsbeitrgen sind zu vermeiden. Zur Schtzung von
Satisfactory but can be As mentioned above,
Mitgliedsbeitrgen sevVery
mssen important
Organisationen unter Very
hohemimportant
brokratischem Aufwand Informationen Dritte
Straightforward Unklare
einholen, die nicht verifizierbar sind. Mitgliedsbeitrge important
Vorgaben wie zur
Very important Very sollten daher nur dann verffentlicht werden, w
Satisfactory but can be All existing
einzelne information
Mitglieder Very weit
zu einem important
berwiegendenSomewhat important
Anteil zur Finanzierung der Verbandsaktivitten beit
Straightforward die in den Aufgabenbereich Verydes
important
Transparenzregisters
Very important
fallen.
Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Not important


Straightforward Somewhat important Very important

Both in the process of registration and updating, the introduction of additional smart online measures
Satisfactory but can be The process
There shouldcould be mor
Verymenus
be drop-down important Somewhat
wherever possible important
(e.g. for EU initiatives worked on linked from EU
Automatic alerts should be introduced for the online form of the Transparency Register. These alerts s
No opinion Very important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be These changes should also
Veryreduce
important
the burden forSomewhat
the JTRS important
to check on the declarations.
Straightforward Very important Very important
No opinion Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Somewhat important

No opinion Very important Very important


Straightforward Unclear rules for calcul Very important Very important
Straightforward Both in the process
The registration of registration
process and updating, the
Very important Veryintroduction
important of additional smart online measures

There should be drop-down menus wherever possible (e.g. for EU initiatives worked on linked from EU

Automatic alerts should be introduced for the online form of the Transparency Register. These alerts s
Straightforward Very important Very important
These changes should also reduce the burden for the JTRS to check on the declarations.
Satisfactory but can be Very important Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Verygegebenen
Wir vermuten, dass ein groer Teil der Fehler in den important Angaben im Lobbyregister versehent
Straightforward Unklare Vorgaben wie zurVery important Very important
Satisfactory but can be Very important Somewhat important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important
The Register should be a user-friendly tool. Therefore, all existing
Straightforward There could be a countryVery important Somewhat
information on Commission websites (on expert groups, important
high-level groups or
Straightforward Very important Very important
other, as well as on EU grants, funds etc) should be used and therefore linked
Satisfactory but can be improved VeryThis
to the transparency register. important Very
will help avoiding important
double work and
Satisfactory but can be factual mistakes. Very important Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be Overall, both the regist Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Cumbersome There are problems withNo opinion No opinion
Straightforward Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be Le registre doit pouvoir Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be BASE appelle un cadraVery important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Verytoimportant
As suggested under B. 2.2, Not important
facilitate the disclosure of participation in EU structures and platforms,
Satisfactory but can be This suggestion is also valid
Verywith
important
regard to other data
Very already
importantin posession of the EU authorities (cf. fu
No opinion Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be The Register should be aVery important Somewhat important
Straightforward WWF EPO has been a regi Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be Le registre doit tre un outil


Veryfacile
important Veryles
utiliser tant pour important
inscrits que pour les citoyens. Raison pour laq
Satisfactory but can be Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important
Satisfactory but can be In
Seegeneral,
answerwe
onfind the registration
financial and updating process
Very important to be straightforward. However, some measu
Very important
Straightforward Somewhat important Not important
- Ambiguity: Making the text on the register site more coherent with the Guidelines, displaying mor
Satisfactory but can be improved
- Very important
Streamlining: Both registrants and the publicSomewhat important
could benefit from a more streamlined Register. For
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward -The register
Automation: The
is user Very
register
friendly andimportant
could alsotobenefit
simple use butVery
from important
other,
therefore smarter
prone toIT solutions.
entries One example
containing could
erroneous datb
Satisfactory but can be It would be very helpful to Very
haveimportant Very important
an editable work sheet as in a large company one usually has many c
No opinion The updating Access
Furthermore, processInfo
weVery
haven't
important
considers done
thatyet,
thethus no
Somewhat
registeropinion.
would be important
far more effective and precise if all regi
Satisfactory but can be Very important Very important
Straightforward If changes are made to tVery important Very important
A good proportion of the errors in the data posted on the lobby register are likely to be accidental or in

Satisfactory but can be Furthermore, the registerSomewhat


would be far
important
more effective
Veryand
important
precise if all registrants were required to sub
No opinion Somewhat important No opinion

Straightforward Very important Not important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward The register is very cle Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be While the updating proceVery important Very important
Satisfactory but can be Insurance Europe is full Very important
El Registro debe ser una herramienta amigable. La Very important existente sobre los websites de la Co
informacin
Straightforward See response under 2.2 Very important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be Asimismo, los apartadosVery a actualizar
importantdeberan ser
Very
los important
mismos en vista lectura que en vista edicin. E
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be The Transparency Registe
Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Satisfactory but can be The Transparency Registe


Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Somewhat important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be Sanctions of banning entVery important Very important
Straightforward Very important
Currently you are discouraged to make updates toVery
the important
register and are only allowed to make an annu
Satisfactory but can be Some of the mistakes byVery
several
important
organisations seem
Verytoimportant
be involuntary. There should be a first check b
Straightforward Very important
At present, the website allows Very
users to copy details of important
clients from the previous year, which facilitates
Straightforward Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be In addition, the website has
Veryatimportant
times paused during
Veryupdates,
important
forcing users to restart the lengthy updat
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Somewhat important
Cumbersome There is very little gui Very important Somewhat important
Straightforward As mentioned above, weVery important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be It should be possible to Very important Somewhat important

Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Somewhat important


No opinion Somewhat important Very important
No opinion Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


No opinion Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important

Straightforward Very important Very important


Wir vermuten, dass ein groer Teil der Fehler in den gegebenen Angaben im Lobbyregister versehent
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important
Straightforward Veryberzeugt,
Des weiteren sind wir davon important dass dasVery important
Register wesentlich effektiver und prziser wre, we
Satisfactory but can be In general, the registration
Very important Very important
and updating process is not overly cumbersome, with only annual updates
Straightforward Very important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be It would also be essentialVery
to automatise
important the checking
Somewhat
of registrations
important so that this is done at the mom
5.1 The European ParliIn the European Commis
In the European Commis
In the European Commis

Very important Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Not important Very important Very important Not important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Not important Somewhat important Not important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Not important Not important Somewhat important Somewhat important
Somewhat important Not important Not important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Somewhat important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Not important Very important Somewhat important Not important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important No opinion

Not important Very important Very important Not important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Not important Somewhat important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Somewhat important Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Not important
Somewhat important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important


Not important Somewhat important Very important Not important
Somewhat important Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Not important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Somewhat important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important


No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Not important Very important Very important Not important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Not important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Somewhat important Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important Not important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Somewhat important


No opinion Very important Very important No opinion

Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Not important


Very important Very important Not important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important

Not important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Not important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Somewhat important Not important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Very important Very important Not important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important No opinion


Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Not important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important

No opinion Not important Somewhat important Not important


Not important Very important Very important Not important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Not important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important


Not important Somewhat important Somewhat important Not important
Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
No opinion Very important Very important No opinion
Not important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Not important Not important Very important Not important

Not important Somewhat important Very important Not important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important Not important Not important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Somewhat important Not important Very important

Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
No opinion Somewhat important Somewhat important No opinion

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Not important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important


Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important

No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion


Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important No opinion

No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion


Very important Very important Not important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion Very important No opinion No opinion

Not important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important

No opinion Very important Very important No opinion

Not important Somewhat important Very important Not important


Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important


Somewhat important Very important Not important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important No opinion

Not important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important


Very important No opinion No opinion Not important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Somewhat important Not important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important


Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Somewhat important No opinion


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Not important Not important Somewhat important Not important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
No opinion Very important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Somewhat important Not important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important


Somewhat important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important No opinion


Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important
No opinion Somewhat important No opinion No opinion
Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important


Somewhat important Very important Very important Very important

Not important Not important Not important Not important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Not important Very important Very important Not important
Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Somewhat important Very important Not important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important


Not important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Somewhat important Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important

No opinion Very important No opinion Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Not important Very important


Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Very important


Not important Somewhat important Very important Not important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Somewhat important Very important Very important


No opinion Very important Very important Very important
Somewhat important Somewhat important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Not important Somewhat important Not important Not important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important No opinion


Not important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Not important Very important
Not important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Not important Somewhat important Somewhat important No opinion

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important

No opinion Very important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Not important Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion Somewhat important Very important No opinion


Somewhat important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Not important Very important Very important Not important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Not important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Not important Very important Very important Not important

Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important No opinion
Very important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important No opinion Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Not important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Not important Very important Very important Not important


Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Somewhat important Not important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion No opinion Somewhat important No opinion


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


No opinion No opinion Not important No opinion

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Not important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion


No opinion Very important Very important No opinion
Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important
Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Not important Very important Very important Not important
Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Very important


Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important


Somewhat important Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Not important Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Not important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Very important

Not important Very important Somewhat important Not important


Very important Not important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Not important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Not important Somewhat important Somewhat important Not important

Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion Not important Not important Not important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Somewhat important No opinion

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Not important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important

Not important Somewhat important Very important Not important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important No opinion


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Not important Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
No opinion Very important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important No opinion Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Not important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Not important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Not important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion


Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Not important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Not important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Not important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Not important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Not important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Not important Very important Very important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Not important Somewhat important Very important Not important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion Very important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Not important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Not important Very important Very important Not important


Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Not important Very important Somewhat important Not important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
No opinion Very important Not important No opinion
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
No opinion Very important Not important No opinion
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Not important Somewhat important Not important Somewhat important

Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important


No opinion Very important Somewhat important No opinion

Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important Somewhat important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


No opinion Very important Somewhat important No opinion
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Not important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
No opinion Very important Very important No opinion
Not important Very important Very important Not important
Very important Somewhat important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Somewhat important Somewhat important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Somewhat important Not important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important

No opinion Very important Very important No opinion


Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important
Somewhat important Very important Somewhat important Somewhat important
Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important


Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important
Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important


Somewhat important Very important Very important Somewhat important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Very important Very important

Very important Very important Somewhat important Very important


Very important Very important Very important Very important
Not important Very important Not important Not important
No opinion Very important Somewhat important No opinion
Very important Very important Very important Very important
In the European Commiss
In the European Commis
Comments or suggestions
6.1 Do
(Optional)
you believe that

Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes

Somewhat important Very important Yes


Somewhat important Very important No

Not important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No opinion


Not important Somewhat important Yes
Not important Not important The main advantage of re
No

Somewhat important Very important Yes


Somewhat important Very important No
Not important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important No

Somewhat important Very important No opinion


Very important Not important Die Hinzuziehung von ExNo

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No opinion

No opinion No opinion No opinion

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes


1.
Somewhat important Very important Yes
No opinion Very important Yes
Not important Very important No
Somewhat important Very important Expert group transparenNo opinion

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important No

Somewhat important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important No


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Tutti i vantaggi sono moltYes

Very important Very important No opinion


Very important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Le fait d'tre enregistr Yes


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important No
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Not important Il faut laisser une cert No opinion
Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important Yes


Very important Not important No opinion
Somewhat important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important Yes


Somewhat important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important La transparence joue daYes

Very important Somewhat important Yes


Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important No opinion

Not important Not important No opinion


Not important Very important Transparence ! pas de lisYes
Very important Very important No

Very important Very important Yes


Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes

Very important Somewhat important Yes


No opinion Very important Yes
Somewhat important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Not important Yes

No opinion Very important No

Not important Somewhat important Yes


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Very important No

Somewhat important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Somewhat important No opinion

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important Yes


Somewhat important Very important No

Somewhat important Very important Yes


Somewhat important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No

Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Verschrfung der VorschrNo opinion
Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes


Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes
Somewhat important Very important No
Somewhat important Very important No opinion
Somewhat important Somewhat important No opinion

Very important Somewhat important Yes


Somewhat important Somewhat important No opinion

Very important Very important No

Somewhat important Very important No

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No


Somewhat important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Very important No opinion

Not important Not important No opinion


Very important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes
Very important Very important Yes

Not important Very important Yes


Not important Very important Listes de diffusion: L'en No

Somewhat important Very important Yes


Very important Somewhat important No opinion
Very important Somewhat important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important Yes
Not important Not important Yes
The Commissions decision to no longer allow non-registrants to meet with hi
Despite the fact that this change may help to further a culture of transparency
Very important Somewhat important Fein wre noch die aut No opinion
Further incentives for registration might include:
Making the names of interest representatives public (not only the organis
Somewhat important Very important Yes
Prohibiting non-registrants from sitting on an expert group;
Not important Very important No opinion
Creating a Points system based on the quality and quantity of informati
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes

No opinion No opinion Yes

Somewhat important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important No

Somewhat important Somewhat important No

Somewhat important Very important No


Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Somewhat important No

Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes


Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Somewhat important No opinion

Somewhat important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No opinion

Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes


Somewhat important Very important No

Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes


Not important Very important No
Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No

Very important Very important No opinion


Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes

Very important Very important No

No opinion No opinion Yes


Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

No opinion No opinion Yes


Not important Very important No

Somewhat important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Somewhat important No

Somewhat important Very important No opinion

No opinion Very important Yes

Somewhat important Somewhat important No

Very important No opinion Yes

Somewhat important Not important No opinion


Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Not important Very important No opinion

Somewhat important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes


Very important Very important as long as professional Yes

Very important Very important No opinion

Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes


Very important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important Yes
Not important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important No

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes


Somewhat important Very important No

Somewhat important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes

Not important Very important No


Respecto a las Listas de correo, no se considera importante puesto que el de
Not important Not important Sobre los Grupos de expertos,
Yes se debera preveer la participacin de experto

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes


Somewhat important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Somewhat important No

Very important Very important No

Not important Not important El derecho a la informacYes

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important No

Very important Very important No opinion


Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important The requirement for regisYes

Somewhat important Somewhat important No


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No


Very important Somewhat important No

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No

Not important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Somewhat important No opinion

Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes


Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important No

Not important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Somewhat important No opinion


Very important Very important Yes

Not important Somewhat important All of these points must No

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important No

Very important Very important No


Very important Very important No opinion
Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes

No opinion Very important We are part of an exper Yes

Somewhat important Somewhat important No opinion

Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important In the interim period bef Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes


Not important Somewhat important Yes
Somewhat important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Somewhat important Yes


No opinion No opinion I 'love' the idea of 'patr Yes
Very important Very important Yes

No opinion Somewhat important Yes

Very important Very important No opinion

Somewhat important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes

Very important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important In the interim period before


No aopinion
legally-binding lobby register comes into force,
Very important Very important Yes
The Commission's policy that only senior elite in the Commission meet with r
Such policies only boost the number of registrations; they do nothing to impro

These incentives would have far more effect if the power to suspend organisa
Not important Very important Overall, such incentives do
Yesnot replace the need for a legally-binding register
Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes
Very important Very important Yes

Not important Somewhat important Yes


Not important Not important Die Handwerkskammer Ulm
No

Very important Very important No


Somewhat important Very important all Commission and EP an
Yes

Somewhat important Very important No


Very important Very important Uwaam to za wane, ale
No
Somewhat important Very important No

Very important Very important Zugang zu Parlamentsgeb


No opinion

Very important Very important Yes


Somewhat important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

No opinion No opinion prepte, ako sa mm doYes

Somewhat important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important th eprocess of public co Yes


Somewhat important Not important Yes

Not important Very important The question under "Publi


Yes
Very important Very important No

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes


Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes be implemented for the access to the Commis
Same level of flexibility should
Very important Very important Indeed, even when reigstered,
Yes we are asked to fill documents to access to m

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No

Very important Very important Yes


Not important Very important No opinion
Somewhat important Very important Yes
No opinion No opinion Der Baden-Wrttembergis
No

Very important Very important les commissaires en foncYes

Somewhat important Very important No

Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes

Very important Very important No

Very important Very important apply advantages to Com


Yes
Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes

No opinion Very important No opinion

Very important Very important Yes


No opinion Very important Die BAK tritt fr ein v Yes

Somewhat important Very important No

Somewhat important Very important Yes


Somewhat important Somewhat important No opinion

Very important Not important No

Somewhat important Very important No opinion


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No


Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important No

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes

Very important Somewhat important Yes


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No


Very important Very important No

Somewhat important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No


Somewhat important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes

Not important Somewhat important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important Yes


Somewhat important Somewhat important Another important AdvanNo
Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Somewhat important Differentiating between No

Very important Very important No


Somewhat important Very important No
Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes

Very important Very important No opinion


Very important Very important No opinion
Not important Not important Yes
Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No

Very important Somewhat important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No opinion


Somewhat important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important All these above points arNo

Very important Very important No


Somewhat important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes


Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes

Somewhat important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Somewhat important No


Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Very important No opinion

Not important Not important Yes


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important No opinion

Somewhat important Somewhat important No opinion

Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes


Somewhat important Very important No

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Somewhat important Yes

Very important Very important Yes


Somewhat important No opinion No

Very important Very important No


Somewhat important Not important Yes
Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

No opinion No opinion No opinion


Very important Very important No opinion
No opinion Somewhat important No
Somewhat important Somewhat important No
Very important Very important No opinion
Somewhat important Very important No opinion
Not important Not important No
Somewhat important Somewhat important No opinion
In the interim period before a legally-binding lobby register comes into force,
Somewhat important Very important In the interim period bef Yes
Very important Very important - The Commission's policy Nothat only senior elite in the Commission meet with
Somewhat important Very important - Such policies only boostYes
the number of registrations; they do nothing to imp
Very important Very important - These incentives wouldYeshave far more effect if the power to suspend organi
Not important Very important - Overall, such incentivesYes
do not replace the need for a legally-binding registe

Somewhat important Somewhat important No


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Somewhat important No

Very important Very important No


Somewhat important Very important Yes
In the interim period before a legally-binding lobby register comes into force,
can be important in incentivising participation in the register. However, such p
boost the number of registrations; they do nothing to improve the data quality
Very important Very important No are many lobby groups accessing the elite of the
register, and arguably there
Very important Very important or gaining access passesYesto the Parliament on the basis of flawed or even mi
lobby register entry. Overall, such incentives do not replace the need for a leg
Somewhat important Very important register. Yes
Very important Very important The above categories doNo

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Es sollte mglich sein, No opinion


Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important No opinion


Somewhat important Very important It would be useful to ha No opinion
Not important Very important No

Not important Very important No

Very important Very important No opinion


Somewhat important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Somewhat important Bis zu einem verbindlichYes


Not important Very important When the results of a CoYes
Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important No


Somewhat important Very important There must be flexibility No
Somewhat important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No opinion

Not important No opinion No

Somewhat important Somewhat important No


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes

Not important No opinion The direct access by ourNo opinion


Very important Very important No

Somewhat important Very important No opinion


Very important Somewhat important Yes

Very important Very important Die mit einer Registrie No opinion

Very important Very important No opinion

Not important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important Yes


Somewhat important Very important the mailing list should b No opinion
Not important Very important Yes
Even in the context of a mandatory system, effective benefits deriving from re
Very important Very important Yes
The quality and detail of communications to registrants concerning public con
Very important Very important No
Very important Very important The establishment of a sort
Yesof EU transparency label could also be conside
Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Somewhat important No opinion


Somewhat important Very important Yes
Very important Very important No

Very important Very important Experts who are not regiNo


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Somewhat important Pour les groupes d'experYes
No opinion Somewhat important No
Very important Very important No than happy that our meetings with EU officials, M
To be clear COSLA is more
Very important Very important No opinion
No opinion No opinion However what we and Scottish Councils entirely dispute is that putting us in t
No opinion

Very important Very important Local Authorities


Ovenstende svarand their
Noofficial
er give opinionand entirely owned subsidiaries such as C
Very important Very important No opinion
The pretension that the EU institutions can impose restrictions of their intera
Somewhat important Very important The
The system of incentives,Yes
current situation at which are in reality disincentives for not registering
Very important Very important Public institutions be thatYes
EU, national, regional and local should not impose
Very important Very important Furthermore, it should beNo ascertained
opinion that the restrictions imposed on non-re
Very important Very important No
No opinion No opinion No
Somewhat important Very important Yes

We support
In the interimthese practical
period before incentives but they
a legally-binding should
lobby not replace
register comes the
intofact tha
force,
Somewhat important Very important Overall, such incentives do
Yes not replace the need for a legally-binding
The Commission's policy that only senior elite in the Commission meet with register
Very important Very important Such policies only boost Nothe number of registrations; they do nothing to imp
These incentives would have far more effect if the power to suspend organi
Very important Very important Overall, such incentivesYesdo not replace the need for a legally-binding registe
No opinion Very important Yes
Very important Very important No caso da Comisso dev Yes
The current situation at the European Parliament in terms of activating the lob
Somewhat important Very important Yes
Very important Somewhat important Yes
Very important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important No opinion
Somewhat important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important Yes

No opinion No opinion Vi avstr frn att svara No


Somewhat important Somewhat important Noverbundenen Vorteile sind alle sehr wichtig und zu
Die mit einer Registrierung
Verteilerlisten der Europischen Kommission, die ffentliche Konsultationen u
Somewhat important Very important Wejedoch
es would wnschenswert,
like to point o Nowenn
opinion
diese die jeweilige Konsultation bzw. den Fa
Very important Very important verlinken wrden, anstattNo nuropinion
auf die jeweilige allgemeine Hompage zu verwe
No opinion Very important No opinion
Very important Very important Es sollte mglich sein, No opinion
Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No


Very important Very important No

Somewhat important Very important Yes


Not important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Very important The current situation at Yes
Very important Very important No opinion

Not important Very important Yes


Very important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important Yes per organization at the same time in the Europea
The limitation of four people
Somewhat important Somewhat important argument behind is aboutYessafety and security, but we would welcome a less d
Very important Very important Es sollte mglich sein, No opinion
Somewhat important Very important No opinion
Es sollte mglich sein, dass einzelne Experten angehrt werden knnen, ohn
Very important Very important KMUs). No opinion
Very important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes


Somewhat important Very important Despite understandable Y
des

Very important Somewhat important Die Fragestellung kann No opinion


Somewhat important Very important No opinion

Somewhat important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important In the interim period bef Yes


Somewhat important Very important The current situation at Yes
Very important Very important No opinion
Plus le lobby est impliqu dans l'laboration des politiques, et plus il est impo
Somewhat important Very important Yes
Not important Very important Yes publiques constituent des mesures importante
Le parrainage et les auditions

Not important Very important Les consultations publiques


Yes devraient rester ouvertes aux entits non-inscrite

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important Hearings of single experNo opinion
Somewhat important Very important Access for registered lo Yes

Very important Very important Yes

Somewhat important Very important The current situation at Yes


Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Es sollte mglich sein, No opinion
Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes
In general, all activities resulting on interaction with the Institutions should req
Somewhat important Very important Yes
Not important Very important However, although we are Yes
Somewhat important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Mandatory registration inNo theopinion
Transparency Register should also be required

Very important Very important The reformed recordings


Furthermore, Transparenc
No
of meetings directly with the European Commission
Not important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Somewhat important Not enough. Nevertheless Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important The above categories doNo
Somewhat important Very important Currently, the European No
Very important Very important No
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important No
No opinion No opinion The right to access and iNo
Very important Very important Experts who are not regiNo opinion
In addition we consider the following potential incentives:
Very important Very important No
Very important Very important The register is usedYes
as a directory for all stakeholders in Brussels
Public consultations: sending automatic alerts to registered entities abou
Mailing lists: relevant organizations featuring on any mailing lists set up t
Very important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important No

Very important Very important No

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important No opinion

Not important Very important Les avantages lis l'e No


Somewhat important Very important The limitation of four p No
Very important Very important No
Not important Very important Tous
Mandatory registration inYes
ces lments sont lethe Transparency Register should also be required
Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes
Not important Very important Furthermore, recordings Yesof meetings directly with the European Commission
Very important Very important No
Somewhat important Very important WWF considers most of Yes th

Very important Very important No


Very important Very important No
Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Not important Somewhat important No

Very important Very important No


Very important Very important Experten mssen auch oNo
Very important Very important Whilst there should be a No
legally-binding regulatory framework to ensure lobby
Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Very important Yes to registration should not restrict the principle o
Any incentives or advantages
Somewhat important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Very important No

Not important Very important In the interim period bef Yes


No opinion No opinion No

Not important Somewhat important No


Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No

Very important Very important No


Somewhat important Very important Yes
Very important Very important No
Somewhat important Very important At the moment the consult
Yes
Very important Very important No opinion
Not important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important No opinion
Somewhat important Not important No opinion
Very important Somewhat important No
Somewhat important Very important These advantages are the
No
Somewhat important Very important These advantages are the
No
Very important Very important No opinion

Very important Very important No


Very important Very important The most important advan
Yes

Somewhat important Very important Yes

Very important Very important No opinion


Somewhat important Very important No opinion

Le systme dincitations, qui consiste en fait dissuader de ne pas sinscrire,


Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Very important En outre, il convient de dterminer
Yes si les restrictions imposes aux lobbyistes
Very important Very important The TR badge daily acti Yes
It is useful to have incentives, however these do not replace the need for a le
Very important Somewhat important No opinion
Very important Very important CSE believes that also aYes positive use of the register could be made provided
Very important Very important Access to the ParliamentNo opinionis a very important advantage for registran
buildings
Very important Very important No opinion
Not important Somewhat important More generally, the possibility
Yes for registration to facilitate access to the institu
Very important Very important Yes

Very important Very important Hinsichtlich Expertengr No opinion

Very important Very important Yes


Very important Very important La Fdration Bancaire Fr
Yes

Very important Very important Guests to committee publicNo hearings


opinion and organisations receiving Parliament
No opinion Very important Der GB fordert ein ver Yes
Very important Very important If patronage is given by the
YesEuropean Commission to an un-registered organ
Somewhat important Very important No
Somewhat important Somewhat important The limitation of four p Yes
Very important Very important The Transparency Register No should be used systematically and structurally to
Somewhat important Very important No
Somewhat important Very important While the register is important
Yes in order to engage with the EU institutions, the

Somewhat important Very important No opinion

Somewhat important Very important Noimportant to incentivize entities to register and abid
We consider that it is very
Not important Very important The efficiency of those No
Not important Very important One observation regarding Yesannouncements and notifications of up-coming co
Very important Very important No

Somewhat important Very important Yes


Very important Very important No gesetzlich verpflichtendes Lobbyregister in Kraft
In der Zwischenzeit, bis ein

Very important Very important - Die Regelung der Kommission,


Yes dass sich leitende Angestellte nur mit regist

- Solche Regelungen frdern


Very important Very important Yes lediglich die Anzahl der Registrierungen, nicht a
- Diese Anreize htten einen wesentlich greren Effekt, wenn der Ausschlus
Very important Very important Registrationregistration
Mandatory should alsoinYes
the Transparency Register should also be required
Somewhat important Very important Yes Anreize kein gesetzlich verpflichtendes Lobbyr
- Alles in allem ersetzen diese
Not important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Very important No opinion
Somewhat important Very important As long as there is no le Yes
Comments or suggestions
6.2 Do
(Optional)
you agree with Comments or suggestions
7.1 How
(Optional)
does the Trans

Yes It is better

Yes It is better
Yes It is better

Yes It is neither better, nor

Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion

Yes It is better

Access to MEPs and EUYes


o It is better

Yes It is better
Yes Any other EU agencies esp
No opinion
Yes It is better

Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better

Yes It is better

Tout contact des lobbys Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is neither better, nor

No opinion It is better
sieh oben Yes It is better

Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Everything should be mad


Yes It is neither better, nor

Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion

Yes It is better

No opinion It is better

Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is better
Yes Every EU member state No
wi opinion
No It is worse
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better

Yes It is neither better, nor worse


Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is better

Yes It is neither better, nor worse


Yes It is worse
Qualsiasi interazione deiYes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes No opinion
l'enregistrement doit t Yes It is better
Yes It is better

No No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Yes It is better
No It is better

All access to MEPs and EP


Yes It is neither better, nor
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
Yes It is better

Yes It is neither better, nor worse


Cualquiera debe pasar po
Yes It is better

Yes It is better

No No opinion
Todos deben estar supe Yes It is better

Yes No opinion

Yes It is better
Smaller groups seem to No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
No It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better

Yes It is better
bien entendu: l'influenceYes mais aussi bien sur le P No opinion
Yes No opinion

Yes It is better
Die Reaktionszeiten si Yes It is worse

Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
No opinion No opinion

Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
accs aux fonctionnairesNo opinion No opinion
Yes It is better

Yes No opinion

Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion

Toegang tot leden Euro Yes No opinion

Yes It is better

Yes It is better
Yes No opinion

No Le mlange des genres n'


It is neither better, nor worse
No opinion It is better

Yes It is better
Yes No opinion

No opinion No opinion

Yes It is better

Yes No opinion

No It is better
No opinion It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better

Yes It is better
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Yes No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is neither better, nor worse


No opinion No opinion

No It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is better

Yes No opinion

Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
Yes No opinion

Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion

Minimum Professional QYes It is better


Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Yes No opinion

Yes No opinion
Il s'agit d'viter de cre Yes No opinion

Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor
Yes No opinion
L'accs aux dputs et aYes It is neither better, nor worse
No The Council is only repreNo opinion

Arrangementer, mder, tiYes It is better


Yes It is better
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Yes No opinion
Jede Interessengruppe, Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is better

Yes No opinion
No opinion No opinion
everything should be off Y
l es It would be advisable to It is better
Toute interaction pouvanYes It is better
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is better

Grundstzlich sollte die Yes Aber verbunden mit erhIt is better

Yes It is better
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is worse
Yes It is better

Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes Just as the European UnNo opinion

Yes It is worse
Yes It is better
No opinion It is better

Yes It is better

Yes Absolument obligatoire No opinion

Yes No opinion
No It is better

Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion

No It is neither better, nor worse

Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse

No It is better

All interaction should be Yes It is better


Yes No opinion

Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes No opinion
Yes It is better

Yes It is better

No opinion No opinion

Yes It is neither better, nor worse

No opinion No opinion

Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is better

No opinion No opinion
Yes No opinion

Yes It is better

Yes No opinion

Yes It is better

Yes No opinion

Yes No opinion

Yes It is worse
honestly why is none of tYes It is neither better, nor

Yes It is better

Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
No It is better

Yes It is better

Yes It is better

Yes No opinion
Yes It is better

Yes No opinion
Yes It is better

Yes It is better

Yes No opinion

Yes No opinion

Any interaction with ALL Y


oes All institutions should be No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion

No opinion No opinion

Yes No opinion

No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better

No opinion No opinion
Yes No opinion

Yes but: Whereas thereYes This is a necessity for No opinion

this would restrict acce No It is better


Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion

Restrictions on joining Yes No opinion

Yes It is better

Yes No opinion

Yes It is better
Yes It is better

Yes It is better
Yes No opinion

Yes No opinion

Yes It is neither better, nor worse


No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
We don't fully understandYes No opinion

No opinion It is better
Yes It is better

Yes No opinion

Yes No opinion

Yes No opinion

Yes No opinion
Since low income populati
No The Council has, like th No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better

Yes It is neither better, nor worse


Yes No opinion

Don't make the process cYes No opinion

Yes It is better
Yes No opinion

Yes It is neither better, nor worse


Yes No opinion
In the interim period before a legally-binding lobby register comes into force, the following interactions should be made conditio

European Commission:
Any lobby meeting with any
YesCommission official No opinion
Any participation in expert groups, advisory groups, market access groups
Any attendance by Commission staff and commissioners at meetings and
other events organised by lobbyists

European Parliament: Yes No opinion


All meetings by MEPs, their staff and Parliament with lobbyists
In the interim period before a legally-binding lobby register comes into force, the following interactions should be made conditio
All events in the Parliament's
Yes premises organised by lobbyists No opinion
Any participation by MEPs, their staff and Parliament staff at events and activities organised by lobbyists
European Commission:
Any participation in official Parliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party groups which organise events inside the Parliame
Any lobby meeting withNo opinion
any Commission official It is better
Any participation in expert groups, advisory groups, market access groups
European Council, the Council, and member states
Any attendance by Commission
YesPresident staff and commissioners at meetingsItand isand
better
Any lobby meeting held by Donald Tusk, members of his Cabinet, staff from the secretariat
other events organised by lobbyists
Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat of the Council
Any lobby meeting held by the permanent representations on EU decision-making matters
European Parliament:
Any lobby meeting held by staff from the European External Action Services, high-level representative Federica Mogherini and
All meetings by MEPs, their staff and Parliament with lobbyists
All events in the Parliament's premises organised by lobbyists
However, it is important to remember that even if all of these incentives areIt implemented, they will still only lead to a de facto m
Any participation by Yes
MEPs, their staff and Parliament staff at events and isactivities
better organised by lobbyists
MoreAny participation in official Parliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party groups which organise events inside the Parli
information here:
http://alter-eu.org/documents/2015/07/next-step-measures
The European Council and Council are significant EU institutions and importa
European Council, the Council, and member states
http://alter-eu.org/sites/default/files/documents/NationalRepresentationBrussels%20FINAL.pdf
Any lobby meeting heldYes by President DonaldHowever,
Tusk, members
if thereofis his
no Cabinet, and
thatstaff from the secretariat
likelihood
No opinion these bodies will join the register, the C
Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat of the Council
Any lobby meeting held by the permanent representations on EU decision-making matters
Any lobby meeting heldYes by staff from the European External Action Services,
No opinion
high-level representative Federica Mogherin

However, it is important to
Yes
remember that even if all of these incentives are
Noimplemented,
opinion they will still only lead to a de facto m
In addition to the acces Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion

No opinion No opinion

Yes No opinion
Yes And everything else COREPIt is neither better, nor
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
We consider that, in the interim period before a legally-binding lobby register comes into force, the following interactions shoul

European Commission: Yes It is better


Any lobby meeting with any Commission official
Any participation in expert groups, advisory groups, market access groups
Any attendance by Commission
Yes staff and commissioners at meetings andNo opinion
other events organised by lobbyists

European Parliament:
No opinion No opinion
All meetings by MEPs, their staff and Parliament with lobbyists
All events in the Parliament's premises organised by lobbyists
Any participation by MEPs, Yestheir staff and Parliament staff at events and activities
No opinionorganised by lobbyists
Any participation in official Parliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party groups which organise events inside the Parliame
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
European Council, the Council, and member states
Any lobby meeting held by NoPresident Donald Tusk, members of his Cabinet, Noand staff from the secretariat
opinion
Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat of the Council
Invitation to EU Forums rYes It is better
Any lobby meeting held by the Permanent Representations on EU decision-making matters
Any lobby meeting held by staff from the European External Action Services, high-level representative Federica Mogherini and
The European Council and Council are significant EU institutions and importa
However, it is important to remember that even if all of these incentives are implemented, they will still only lead to a de facto m
Yes However, if there is no likelihood
No opinion that these bodies will join the register, the C
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion

We are of the view that the current mandatory registration system already covers the most important interactions between EU
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Um den Zugang zu Abgeor
No Der Europische Rat best
NoEurope
Parliamentary events should remain accessible to the public at large. Invest opinionhas had the opportunity in the past to brin

MEPs will often hold meetings in their constituencies with organisations that are not registered at European level and they sho
Yes We agree that the CounciNo opinion
all Commission and EP an
Yes It is better

Yes It is neither better, nor worse


A czym byaby rejestrac Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is better

Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion

Yes It is better

Yes It is better

Yes No opinion

No opinion No opinion

No opinion No opinion

Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Mit meinem VerfahrensvoYes It is better


Yes It is better

All meetings, invitations Yes It is better

Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse

All of the above except mYes Of course! This is anoth No opinion


Yes It is better

Yes It is better

Speaking slots at public No opinion No opinion

Speaking slots at public No opinion No opinion

Yes No opinion

Yes It is neither better, nor worse


Yes No opinion

Yes It is worse

No opinion No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Zugang zu Mitgliedern Yes It is better


Yes It is better

Yes It is neither better, nor worse

alle Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is better

Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is better

Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes fcuk yea It is neither better, nor worse
Um einen niederschwelliNo Der Europische Rat best
No opinion

Toute interaction doit tr Yes Parmi les pires cas de l It is neither better, nor

Yes It is neither better, nor

Yes It is better

No opinion No opinion

Yes It is better
Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes No opinion
Ungeachtet dessen, dass die Eintragung in das Transparenzregister verpflichtend sein sollte, sollte eine Eintragung auch Bed

Darunter fallen insbesondere:


- Termine mit allen Angestellten der Kommission sowie MitarbeiterInnen von EU-Agenturen
- Termine mit Europischen Abgeordneten, ihren MitarbeiterInnen und MitarbeiterInnen des Europischen Parlaments
- Termine mit dem Prsidenten des Europischen Rats, seinem Kabinett sowie dem Generalssekretariat des Rates
- Lobbytermine in den Stndigen Vertretungen
- Teilnahme an ExpertInnengruppen oder hnlichenDieGruppen
BAK spricht
der Kommission
sich dafr aus, auch den Europischen Rat, den Rat und die
Yes
- Teilnahme an parlamentarischen Intergroups It is better
- Teilnahme der oben genannten
Yes Personen aus EK,
Sollte
EP,der
EREuropische
und Rat an vonRat
It is
LobbyistInnen
und
worse
Rat diesem
organisierten
Vorhaben zumVeranstaltungen
jetzigen Zeitpunkt

Il parat dlicat de dem No Nous considrons que ceIt is better

Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion

Yes It is better

No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better

Yes It is worse
E.g. the EAPN annual EuYes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is better
Yes It is better
The current balance of inYes The Council is the least It is better

Yes It is better
Yes It is better

Yes No opinion
Typically interest Grou Yes It is better
in a democracy all voter Yes No opinion
No opinion I don't know It is better

Yes It is better

Yes It is neither better, nor worse


Yes It is better

Yes It is worse

Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is neither better, nor worse

No opinion No opinion

Yes It is better

difficult exercise Yes It is better

Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion

Yes It is better

Yes No opinion
No It is better
No It is better

Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
It should depend on the lNo It is better
Yes It is better

Yes It is better

Yes It is better

Yes It is better

Yes No opinion

Yes It is better

Yes It is better

No opinion No opinion
Access to MEPs and parliYes It is better
contactos con eurodiputaYes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
No opinion No opinion

No opinion It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better

Yes It is better
Yes It is better

Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is neither better, nor worse

No opinion It is neither better, nor worse


Yes It is better
The following recommendations should be put in place, during the interim Itperiod
Yes is better
prior to the establishment of a legally-binding

European Commission:
1) Any lobby meeting with any Commission official
Yes It is better
2) Any participation in expert groups, advisory groups, market access groups
3) Any attendance by Commission staff and commissioners at meetings and other events organised by lobbyists
Yes It is better
European Parliament: Yes No opinion
1) All meetings by MEPs, their staff and Parliament with lobbyists
Yes
2) All events in the Parliament's premises organised by lobbyists No opinion
3) Any participation by MEPs,
Yes their staff and Parliament staff at events andIt activities
is better organised by lobbyists
4) Any participation in official Parliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party groups which organise events inside the Parliam

European Council, the Council, and Member States:


1) Any lobby meeting held by President Donald Tusk, members of his Cabinet, and staff from the secretariat
2) Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat of the Council
3)
In Any lobby meeting
the interim held by
period before the permanent lobby
a legally-binding representations on EU
register comes decision-making
into matters
force, the following interactions should be made conditio
4) Any lobby meeting held by staff from the European External Action Services, high-level representative Federica Mogherini a
European Commission: Yes The European Council and No opinion
Yes
Any lobby meeting with any Commission official No opinion
Any participation in expert groups, advisory groups, market access groups
Any attendance by Commission
Yes staff and commissioners at meetingsItand is neither better, nor worse
We consider that, in the interim period before a legally-binding lobby register comes into force, the following interactions shoul
other events organised by lobbyists
Yes It is better
European Commission: Yes No opinion
European Parliament:
Any lobby meeting with any Commission official
All meetings by MEPs, their staff and Parliament with lobbyists
Any participation
All events in in
theexpert groups,premises
Yes advisory groups, market access groupsIt is better
Parliament's organised by lobbyists
Any attendance by Commission staff and commissioners at meetings andand activities organised by lobbyists
Any participation by MEPs, their staff and Parliament staff at events
other events organised by lobbyists
No opinion No opinion
Any participation in official Parliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party groups which organise events inside the Parli
No opinion No opinion
European Parliament:
European
See Council,
comments at the Council,
3.2. Yes and member statesBroadly agree that a reg It is better
All
meetings bymeeting
MEPs, their staff and Parliament
Donaldwith lobbyists
Any lobby held
Yes by President Tusk, members of his Cabinet,
No opinionand staff from the secretariat
All
events in themeeting
Parliament's premises organised by lobbyists
Any lobby held by the general secretariat of the Council
Any participation by MEPs, Yestheir staff and Parliament staff at events and activities
It is better
organised by lobbyists
Any lobby meeting held by the permanent representations on EU decision-making matters
Any participation in official
YesParliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party It groups
is better which organise events inside the Parliame
Any lobby meeting held by staff from the European External Action Services, high-level representative Federica Mogherin
No opinion The European Council and No Council
opinion are significant EU institutions and importa
European Council, the Council,
Yes and member states Noimplemented,
opinion
However, it is important to remember that even if all of these incentives are they will still only lead to a de facto m
Any lobby meeting held by President Donald Tusk, members of his Cabinet, and staff from the secretariat
Yes However, if there is no likelihood
It is neither
thatbetter,
these nor
bodies will join the register, the C
Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat of the Council
No opinion No
Any lobby meeting held by the Permanent Representations on EU decision-making matters opinion
Any lobby meeting held by Yesstaff from the EuropeanThe
The transparency
External
European Action system
Council It isCouncil
Services,
and worse arerepresentative
high-level significant EUFederica
institutions
Mogherini
and importa
and
Yes Se l'obiettivo di estendIt is better
However, it is important toYesremember that even if However,
all of theseif there
incentives
is no are
likelihood
Noimplemented,
opinion
that these
theybodies
will still
willonly
joinlead
the register,
to a de facto
the Cm

Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
All entities involved in Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse

Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Any participation by MEPs, their staff and Parliament staff at events and activities
organised by lobbyists
Any participation in official Parliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party groups
which organise events inside the Parliament
European Council, the Council, and member states
Any lobby meeting held by President Donald Tusk, members of his Cabinet, and
staff from the secretariat
Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat TheofEuropean
the Council
Council and Council are significant EU institutions and importa
Any lobby meeting held by the permanent representations also occurs ontowards
EU decision-making
the member states' permanent representations in Brusse
matters lobby register should be fully extended to include the European Council, the C
Any lobby meeting held by staff from the European permanent
External
representations.
Action Services, highlevel
Yes
representative Federica Mogherini and her Cabinet No opinion
However, if there is no likelihood that these bodies will join the register, the C
Yes
However, it is important to remember that even if and all ofParliament
these incentives It implemented,
shouldare is better
proceed to revise the present register and set-up lega
they will still only leadistonot
BUSINESSEUROPE a de
in facto
favourmandatory
of a legallyregister.
system.
binding There
Recalcitrance
remains
register. The aexample
on
pressing
the part
ofneed
of the
some forother institutions
member states with should nottrack
a good prevent
reco
a legally-binding register.Yes new register. No opinion
We would especially seeNo major
opinion
problems if the register were to be made conditional
It is neitheronbetter,
commissioners
nor or senior commission o

Con los Consejos ConsulNo opinion No opinion


Con los Consejos ConsulNo opinion No opinion

No opinion It is neither better, nor worse


Con los Consejos ConsulNo opinion No opinion

Con los Consejos ConsulNo opinion No opinion


Con los Consejos ConsulNo opinion No opinion
Con los Consejos ConsulNo opinion No opinion

No It is neither better, nor worse

financements europensYes No opinion


Yes No opinion

Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Bis zur Einfhrung einesYes It is neither
verbindlichen Lobbyregisters sollten folgende Aspekte better, noreiner
Voraussetzung worseRegistrierung werden:
Kommission:
-This Alle Lobbymeetings
increases werden erfasst
burocrac Yes No opinion
- Alle Teilnehmer an Expertentreffen etc. werden genannt
EP:
- Alle Lobbytreffen mit MEPs und Mitarbeitern werden erfasst
- Alle Events im EP, auch von offiziellen Gruppen wie Intergroups und inoffiziellen interfraktionellen Gruppen, etc. werden e
Rat und MS: Yes No opinion
The
- subject
Alle Lobbytreffen vom Prsidenten, Mitgliedern seines Kabinetts, undNo
of the lobby Yes opinion
Sekretariats-Mitarbeitern werden erfasst
- Alle Treffen vom Generalsekretariat des Rats werden erfasst
Yes Der Rat ist eine wesent No opinion
Any meetings that are intYes The Council of the EU beiNo opinion
Following the definition gYes No opinion

Yes It is neither better, nor worse

No Trying to include 28 nat It is neither better, nor


YesCommission official, any participation in expertNo
Any lobby meeting with any opinionadvisory groups, market access groups, an
groups,
In the European Parliament all meetings with MEPs, their staff and Parliamentopinion
Yes No with lobbyists, events in the Parliament's premis
Nothe
For the European Council, opinion
Council, and member
Thestates
European
any lobby
Council It isCouncil
meeting
and neither
held bybetter,
of th EUnor
areworse
President Donald
significant
Tusk,
EUmembers
institutions
of his
an
Yes However, if there is no likelihood
No opinion that these bodies will join the register, the C
Yes No opinion

Yes Ein Transpartenzgesetz u


It is worse

No It is neither better, nor worse


All contact with EU officials from the Commission and the Parliament should be conditional to prior registration.
No opinion No opinion
In 2014, the CommissionYes has started to oblige its The
Commissioners,
participation Directorat
of the It isGeneral's
better and members of the Cabinet of the Com
Yes No opinion

The direct access by ourNo opinion No opinion


No opinion No opinion

Yes It is better
Yes Mais avec quelles excepIt is better

Das TransparenzregisterYes It is better

No opinion It is neither better, nor worse

Yes No opinion

Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
In general, because of its constrictive character, a mandatory system - even more so than a voluntary one - is viable only if it re
Yes No opinion
Over-regulation is not advisable. The EU framework should be kept light and avoid creating additional administrative burdens.
Yes There should be a level pl
No opinion
We have a certain degree Yes
of understanding for the
While
argument
the technical
that an diff
exaggeratedly
No opinionextensive and detailed record of meetings
Yes No opinion

Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion
Unregistered lobbyists should not be able to organise
To allow events
the public
at the
to monitor
Europeanthat
Parliament
the aboveorprinciples are respected, the Co

the Commission. meetings with lobbyists in a similar fashion to the European Commission. The
Transparency International is convinced that a mandatory register that is legally binding for lobbyists and can be enforced by t
To allow the public to monitor that the above principles publish areallrespected,
written input thebyinstitutions
lobbyists inshould
a central location to allow the establish
In preparation of a mandatory lobby register a new IIA can bring about further transparency and with sufficient political will it co
publish meetings with lobbyists. Current transparency Legislative
provisionsFootprint.
that apply to Commissioners,
To make this approach work, Yes the Commission, Parliament and Council
Ein Eintrag im Transpar should be guided by the aim to make it as difficult as po
It is better
Cabinets and Directors-General should be extended Lobbying
to include
transparency
all officialsisthat
onlyhaveas strong
significant
as its weakest element, since there i
Unregistered lobbyists should not have access to Parliament/Commission premises. Visitors that are not on the register should
influence on the decision-making process, down to activities
Head ofand Unit
undue
level.influence
When publishing
tend to concentrate
the on the least transparent pa
Unregistered lobbyists Yes not be able to get meetings. This should beItthe
should is neither
case better,
for all nor worse
officials. Among the be
MEPs thisconditio
shoul
In the interim period before a legally-binding lobby register comes into force, the following interactions should made
subject of meetings, information
Yes should include reference
making process.
to the concrete
In orderlegislative
Ittoishave
bettera procedure
robust system of lobby transparency, it is
C'est la cas
Unregistered
European
The current actuelleme
Commission:
Transparency Yes
lobbyists should not advise
Register the Parliament
is already somewhat as quasi-mandatory It as
part of intergroups, is better
parliamentary
the Register works hearings or in any other
on a voluntary basis advisory
and inc
if applicable
Any lobbyand not simply
meeting Yesrepeat
with the portfolioofficial
any Commission oftothe
ensure
official.transparency
For the Europeanthroughout
It iswillParliament
better the entire decision-making process. The C
Therefore, the current quasi-mandatory register means that interest groups sign up as this is the only way to access high-
Unregistered
We therefore lobbyists
Any participation
suggest in should
theexpert
No not advise
groups,
Commission
opinion the Commission
advisory
to keep Transparency
groups,
the broadmarketas partInternational
definition ofofhigh-level
access Nostrongly
groups
mandatory groups,
in aadvocates
opinion consultative
possibly for committees,
a register
revised thatexpert
approach. covers groups
all EU
president,
vice-presidents,
Any attendance group presidents, committee
by Commission European chairsUnion
andinrapporteurs
its roleand as co-legislator,
publishing theiralongside the European Parliamen
No opinion staff and commissioners at meetingsNo opinion
Unregistered
other lobbyists should
events organised by not be able to organise
lobbyists Council
eventsshouldat the
joinEuropean
the Inter-Institutional
Parliament or Agreement
the Commission.
and become a full memb
Yes
meetings should be mandatory. Other MEPs should all EU
publish
legislation.
their meetings No
Decisions, onopinion
which
a voluntary
affectbasis.
the daily life of 500 million of EU cit
To allow
European the publiclobbyists
Parliament:
Unregistered to monitor that the
should notabove principles
have access To to allow
aretherespected,
public tothe
Commission/Parliament monitor
institutions
that the
premisesshould
abovepublish principles
meetings
are respected,
with lobbyists.
the CoC
The
Parliament
All meetingsand by the
MEPs, Commission
Yesshould
their staff should publish three allwith
institutions,
written inputthe by Council
lobbyists remains
No opinion in a central
the blind-spot when it comes to lobbyin
Unregistered lobbyists notand Parliament
be able to get meetings lobbyists
with Commission officials/MEPs
Organisations events with bad No should
opinion
entries should
not be
be temporarily
to Lobbying suspended
transparency No opinion
The All
location
Unregistered
pretension
to
in the
allow that
Parliament's
lobbyists
the EU institutions
the establishment
premises
ancan
of staff
EU
organised
able
impose organise
The
Legislative
TI
by lobbyists
events
restrictions
pretension
research
Footprint. ofand
on
that
their
repeatedly
no
the
the is
longer
only
premises
interactions
EU get
as of
strong
access
thethe
institutions
confirmed. with
TIs
asto
can
recent EUits
the
Commission/ weakest
impose Commission,
institutions
report
element,
Parliament
restrictions
on EU
Lobbying
Parliament
since
their there
inofmatters
Europe:
andi
intera
that
Hid
We consider Any participation
Unregistered by Yes
MEPs, their and Parliament staff at events It
and is neither
activities better,
organised nor worse
by lobbyists
that, lobbyists should
in the interim not before
period be ableatolegally-binding
We
advise agree thewith
Commission/Parliament
the Commissions
lobby register comesview intothat
force,thethe Council
followingof the EU shouldshoul
interactions inde
European Anyinstitutions
Public participation in official
Yes Parliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party
It EU, groups
is privileges
neither which
better, nororganise events inside orthe Parli
Organisations
Transparency Internationalwith be
Commission: badthat EU, national,
entries
is should beregional
convinced temporarily
that a
and
Public
mandatory
local
Privileged institutions
should
suspendedAccess
register
notbe
and impose
shows
that no that
is longer
that
legally
national,
get
the accessand
Council
binding
regional
for toregistration
the and
scoring
lobbyists
local
meagre
and
obligations,
can
should not
19be%enforced even
impose
compared ex
bywt
Any lobby meeting withYes any Commission officialThe CCBE is in favour ofNo opinion
European
Commission, Council, in
Any participation the Council,
No
expert and member states Itthe
isgroups
neither better, nor
In
As preparation
Any lobby Parliament
of a mandatory
meeting andgroups,
held byCouncil.
lobby
advisory
They
register
President
groups,
should
a new
Donald bemarket
Commission
IIA excluded
can bring
access
at from
53of%
about
groups
expert
and
further Europeanand
transparency business
Parliament
andthe with 37 %political
withsecretariat
sufficient is a particular
will it co b
ItTusk,
wouldmembers
Any attendance by Commission staff and commissioners at meetings his Cabinet,
and other and
eventsstaff from
organised by lobbyists European Par
with the forthcoming Yes make sense for It is better
All meetings
Any lobbyby meeting
MEPs, held by the
their offences general
staff and should secretariat
Parliament of the Council
delegations.
To
Allmake this Grave
Any lobby approach
meetingor repeat
Yes
work,
held bythetheCommission,
permanent be it with
sanction
comes
Parliament
representations
lobbyists
to
and lobbying
Counciltransparency.It is neither
should be guided better,
by the nor aim to make it as difficult as po
events in the Parliament's premises organised by lobbyistson EU decision-making matters
AnyFederation
The Any lobby meeting
participation held by
of Enterprises
by MEPs, instaff
their from
Belgium
staff andisthenotEuropean
inThe
Parliament European
favour External
of a
staff Council
atlegallyAction
events binding
and Services,
and Council high-level
register.
activities are
Thesignificant
organised representative
example EU
of
by lobbyists institutions
some Federica
member and
Mogherin
importa
states wit
Unregistered lobbyists should not have access to Parliament/Commission premises. Visitors that are not on the register sho
Any participation in official Parliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party groups which organise events inside the Parliam
Unregistered lobbyists should not be able toTusk,
get
if Transparency
allmeetings. This
International
should be isstrongly
the
andcase
However,
We would itespecially
is important seetoYesremember
major that
problems ifeven
the However,
register of these
wereif to
there
incentives
be is Cabinet,
madeno are likelihood
It implemented,
neither
conditional thatadvocates
for
better,
on theseall
theyofficials.
nor
bodies
commissioners forstill
will awill
Among
register
only
join
or the
leadthat
the
senior MEPs
covers
a de this
register,
tocommission allsho
facto
the EU
Cm
o
Any lobby meeting held by President Donald members of his staff from the secretariat
Unregistered lobbyists should
No opinion not advise the Parliament as part of intergroups,
It is parliamentary
neither better, nor hearings or in any other advis
Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat The ofEuropean
the Council Council and Council are significant EU institutions and importa
Unregistered lobbyists
held should not advise the Commission
Council should
as
onpart
join ofthe high-level
Inter-Institutional
groups, consultative
Agreement and committees,
become a expert
full memb
grou
Any lobby meeting by the Permanent Representations
http://alter-eu.org/documents/2016/03-0
EU decision-making matters
Unregistered lobbyists should not be able to organise events at the European Parliament or the Commission.
Any lobby meeting heldYes by staff from the European However,
External if there
Action is Services,
no likelihood
No opinion
high-level
that these representative
bodies will join Federica
the register,
Mogherini the an
C
To allow the public to monitor that the above principles are respected, the Co
Yes It is neither
To allow the public to monitor that the above principles are respected, the institutions should publish meetings with lobbyists. C better, nor worse
Yes Lobbying transparency isItonly is neither better,
as strong as norits weakest element, since there i

Yes It is neither better, nor


interactions avec les r Yes No opinion
Yes
internationale NGOs mit ECOSOC Status in der UNO und als Partnerorganisation No opinion in der EU-Grundrechteagentur haben einen
Zum Beispiel hat die international
Yes ttige NGO-Organisation Verein zur Frderung
It is better
der Vlkerverstndigung (Society for the Adv
Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion
Representatives of organYes No opinion
Das Transparenzregister sollte nicht nur fr das Europische Parlament und die Kommission gelten, sondern
sollte alle EU-Institutionen, mithin auch den Ministerrat, umfassen. Man sollte jedoch bei der Gestaltung eines
No Rdet r en av de tv besNo opinion
verbindlichen Transparenzregister darauf achten, dass die unkomplizierte Nutzbarkeit und der relativ geringe
Verwaltungsaufwand erhaltenYes bleiben. Insbesondere sollte der administrative
It is und
better
personelle Aufwand zur
Registrierung mglichst klein gehalten werden, um vor allem kleine NGOs oder andere Vertreter der
In a democratic society,
Zivilgesellschaft Yes
nicht auszuschlieen, the register
die mit hohen should
Kosten und cove ItVerwaltungsaufwand
groem is neither better, norberfordert wren. Der jeweilig
Rechnung getragen werden. Yes It is better
Yes It is better
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
Nach Ansicht des BDEWNo s opinion It is neither better, nor worse

Vertreter von Organisati Yes No opinion

No opinion No opinion
In the interim period before a legally-binding lobby register comes into force, the following interactions should be made conditio
European Commission:
To
Anymake
lobbythis approach
meeting with work, the Commission,
any Commission officialParliament and Council should be guided by the aim to make it as difficult as po
Any participation in expert groups, advisory groups, market access groups
Unregistered
Any attendance by lobbyists shouldstaff
Commission not and
havecommissioners
access to Parliament/Commission
at meetings and premises. Visitors that are not on the register sh
Unregistered lobbyists should
other events organised by lobbyists not be able to get meetings. This should be the case for all officials. Among the MEPs this sh
Unregistered
European Parliament:lobbyists should not advise the Parliament
Transparency as part
International
of intergroups,
strongly
parliamentary
advocates for hearings
a register
or in
that
anycovers
other all
advis
EU
Unregistered
SEAP
All believes
meetings lobbyists
by that
MEPs,anytheirshould not advise the
rYes staff and Parliament with Commission
The absence as part of
lobbyists of Council w high-level
It is bettergroups, consultative committees, expert gro
Unregistered lobbyists should
All events in the Parliament's not beorganised
premises able to organise
Council should
events join
by lobbyists at the
theEuropean
Inter-Institutional
Parliament
Agreement
or the Commission.
and become a full memb
Any participation by MEPs, Yestheir staff and Parliament staff at events and activities organised by lobbyists
Itinstitutions
is better
To
Anyallow the publicinto
participation monitor
official that the above
Parliament principles
intergroups To
andallow
arethe
respected,
public
unofficial tothe
monitor
cross-party that the
groups should
abovepublish
principles
meetings
are respected,
with lobbyists.
the CoC
Yes It is betterwhich organise events inside the Parliame
European Council, the Council, and member states
See our answers
Organisations withtobad
quesYes should be temporarily No opinion
Any lobby meeting held entries
by President Donald Tusk, Lobbying
suspended
members transparency
and
of his no is
longer
Cabinet, only
andget
as strong
access
staff fromastoits
the theweakest
Commission,
secretariat element,Parliament
since there
andi
Yes
Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat of the Council It is neither better, nor
Any lobby meeting held by Yesthe permanent representations on EU decision-making No opinion matters
Any lobby meeting held by staff from the European TheExternal
EU lobbyAction
register
Services,
should high-level
be fully extended
representative
to include
Federica
the European
MogheriniCoun
and
However, it is important to Yesremember that even if However,
all of theserecalcitrance
incentives are on
Noimplemented,
theopinion
part of thethey
otherwillinstitutions
still only lead
should
to anot
deprevent
facto m
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
In principle, we think no access should be given to any official for lobbyingNo
Yes opinionwithout being registered. There are surely
purpose
We also realize that this Yes is a rule easier to enforceThe to staff
Council
members
is a keythan
parto
It is
elected
betterpoliticians.
In the interim period before a legally-binding lobby register comes into force, the following interactions should be made conditio
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
European Commission: No opinion It is neither better, nor
No opinion
Any lobby meeting with any Commission official It is neither better, nor worse
No opinion
Any participation in expert groups, advisory groups, market access groups It is better
Any attendance by Commission staff and commissioners at meetings and
other events organised
Representatives of organbyYeslobbyists No opinion
European Parliament:
Transparency International is convinced that a mandatory register that is legally binding for lobbyists and can be enforced by t
All meetings by MEPs, their staff and Parliament with lobbyists
In preparation
All events of
in athe Yes
Parliament's premises It is better
mandatory lobby register organised by lobbyists
a new IIA can bring about further transparency and with sufficient political will it co
Yes
Any participation by MEPs, their staff and Parliament staff at events and No opinion
activities organised by lobbyists
make
To Any participation
this approachinwork,
official
theParliament
Commission,intergroups andand
Parliament unofficial
Councilcross-party
should begroups
guidedwhich
by theorganise events
aim to make inside
it as the as
difficult Parli
po

European Council,
Unregistered the Council,
lobbyists should
No and
not member
opinion states
have access to Parliament/Commission No premises.
opinion Visitors that are not on the register sho
Unregistered
Any lobby meeting
lobbyistsheld by President
should
Yes not be ableDonald
to getTusk, members
meetings. This of his Cabinet,
should be
It isthe and staff
case
better from
for all the secretariat
officials. Among the MEPs this sho
Unregistered
Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat
lobbyists should not advise the Parliament of the
Transparency Council
as part
International
of intergroups,
strongly
parliamentary
advocates hearings
for a register
or inthat
anycovers
other advis
all EU
Any lobby meeting
Unregistered lobbyistsheld by the
should notpermanent
advise the representations
Commission as on partEUof decision-making
high-level groups, matters
consultative committees, expert grou
Any lobby meeting
Unregistered lobbyistsheld by staff
should from
not be thetoEuropean
able The European
organise
Council External
events
shouldat Council
Action
join
thethe Services,
and
European Council
high-level
are significant
Inter-Institutional
Parliament representative
Agreement
or EU institutions
the Commission.
and Federica
become andMogherin
importa
a full memb
esoecially access to officYes It is better
However, it ispublic
To allow the important to remember
to monitor that the that even
above if However,
all allow
principles
To of these if there
arethe incentives
publicisto
respected, no are
likelihood
the implemented,
monitor thatthat
institutionsthe these
shouldthey
above bodies
will still
publish will
principles only
join
arelead
meetings the register,
to alobbyists.
respected,
with de the
facto
theCoCC
m
Yes No opinion
Organisations with bad entries
Yes should be temporarily Lobbying
suspended
transparency
and no is longer
Itonly
is neither
get
as strong
access
better,
astonor
its
theweakest
Commission,
element,Parliament
since thereandi
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes Le Conseil de l'UE est aussi It is better
important que le Parlement europen en terme l
Transparency International
L'accs aux fonctionnair Yesis convinced that a mandatory register
Etendre le that
registre auisConseil
legally bindingtoutefois
No opinion
crera for lobbyists and can be
des difficults enforcedcar
pratiques, bylet

In preparation of a mandatory lobby register a new IIA can bring about further transparency and with sufficient political will it co

To make this approach work, the Commission, Parliament and Council should be guided by the aim to make it as difficult as po
As stated above, clear rules and their actual enforcement are key. The Joint T
Yes
- Unregistered lobbyists should not have access to Parliament/Commission Nopremises.
opinion Visitors that are not on the register shou
- Unregistered lobbyists should not be able to getVolkswagen
No opinion meetings. This should be
furthermore theneither
caseestablishing
Itsuggests
is for all officials.
better, nor worse Among the
an advisory MEPs
body thisSecre
to the sho
- Unregistered lobbyists should
Yes not advise the Parliament
Transparency
as part
International
of intergroups,
Nostrongly
parliamentary
opinion advocateshearings
for a register
or in any
that other
coversadviso
all EU
- Unregistered lobbyists should not advise the Commission as part of high-level groups, consultative committees, expert group
- Unregistered lobbyists should not be able to organise
Council
events
shouldatjoin
the the
European
Inter-Institutional
ParliamentAgreement
or the Commission.
and become a full memb

To allow the public to monitor that the above principles


To allow
arethe
respected,
public tothe
monitor
institutions
that the
should
abovepublish
principles
meetings
are respected,
with lobbyists.
the CoC
No opinion No opinion
Organisations with bad entries should be temporarily
Lobbying
suspended
transparency
and no islonger
only get
as strong
accessastoits
theweakest
Commission,
element,
Parliament
since there
andi
Yes It is neither better, nor
- alle Treffen von MdEPs, deren Angestellten und Angestellte des Parlaments mit LobbyistInnen
- alle Treffen auf dem Gelnde des Parlaments, die von LobbyistInnen organisiert sind
- jedwede Partizipation von MdEPs, deren Angestellten und Angestellten des Parlament bei Veranstaltungen und Aktivitten, d
- jedwede Partizipation in offiziellen Intergroups des Parlaments und unoffiziellen berparteilichen Gruppen, die Veranstaltung

Europarat, Rat, und Mitgliedsstaaten


- jedwede Lobbytreffen mit YesPrsident Donals Tusk, Mitgliedern seines Kabinetts und Angestellten des Sekretariat
No opinion
- jedwede Lobbytreffen mit dem Sekretariat des Rates
Lenregistrement pralabYes
- jedwede Lobbytreffen Le
DerGroupe
mit Angestellten des Europischen Socit
Europische
Auswrtigen Gnral
Rat und It Rat
is better
Dienstes, sind
derwesentliche
hohen Vertreterin
EU-Institutionen
Federica undMogherini
wichtige
un
All Commission officials Yes No opinion
Es ist wichtig zu betonen,No opinion
dass selbst wenn all diese
Wenn Anreize
jedochdurchgesetzt Itwerden,
is neithersie
keine Wahrscheinlichkeit better,
doch nor
nur worse
besteht, zu
dass
einem
diese
quasi-verpflichtende
Institutionen dem
Yes No opinion
CIP is not in favour of a legally binding register. The example
of some member states with a good track record shows that very high levels of
All of those mentioned
transparency shYes
and ethical The Council
policy-making can be achieved withoutshould be suNo opinion
any mandatory
As required in Sweden
register for lobbyists. frYes It is better
Yes No opinion
We would especially seeNo major problems if the register were to be made It is neither better, nor worse
opinion
conditional on commissioners or senior commission officials being able to meet
Mandatory registration in the Transparency Register should also be required for organisations and bodies participation in stake
stakeholders. This could Yeslimit the meetings to representatives
EFPIA wouldofsupportthe theIt is neither better, nor
Brussels bubble, and make it more difficult for SME representatives (who are
Furthermore, recordings No of meetings
opinion directly with the European Commission It isshould
better be extended to all levels of officials, such
often not on the register) to meet with decision-makers. It would thus
Of
impede on the Commissions goal of better integrating SME concerns in its better
course. To me, the goYes Obviously: it's a legislati It is
Yes run against its visionEURALIA
policies and, more generally, for smartersoutient la Comm
and better It is better
law-making. Yes No opinion
No opinion It is neither better, nor
Yes AmCham EU would welcome It is neither better, nor
No opinion No opinion
EENA firmly believes thatYes All institutions having It is better
Yes No opinion
See above Yes Insofar as the Interinsti No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better

Yes No opinion

Yes No opinion

No opinion No opinion

Yes It is better
Yes No opinion

No opinion It is better
SMEs may not be register Yes No opinion
Yes Fr alle am europische No opinion
Certainement. Le Registre
Mandatory registration inYes It isfor
the Transparency Register should also be required neither better, nor
organisations worse
and bodies participation in stake
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Furthermore, recordings No of meetings
opinion directly with the European CommissionIt isshould
better be extended to all levels of officials, such
Confindustria is not in No opinion No opinion
All direct interactions Yes No opinion

No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
- Any participation in expert groups, advisory groups, market access groups
In the interim period before a legally-binding lobby register comes into force, the following interactions should be made conditio
- Any attendance by Commission staff and commissioners at meetings and other events organised by lobbyists
European Commission:
European Parliament:
Any lobby meeting with any Commission official
- All meetings by MEPs, their staff and Parliament with lobbyists
Any participation in expert groups, advisory groups, market access groups
- All events in the Parliament's premises organised by lobbyists
Any attendance by Commission staff and commissioners at meetings and
- Any participation by MEPs, their staff and Parliament staff at events and activities organised by lobbyists
other events organised byNolobbyists
-SUEZ believes thatinevents
Any participation official opinion
Parliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party No opinion
groups which organise events inside the Parliam
Ceci n'empchera en rien No No opinion
European Parliament:
European Council, the Council, and member states:
In general,
All meetingsfindbythe
MEPs, their staff and Parliament with lobbyistsbe adequate.
- Any lobby we
meeting current
held No
advantages
by opinion
President linked
Donald to registration
Tusk, members oftohis Cabinet,
It is and staffbetter,
neither from the
nor secretariat
worse
All events in the Parliament's premises organised by lobbyists
- Any lobby meeting held by the General Secretariat TheofEuropean
the Council Council and Council of the European Union are EU institutions
Any participation
However, additional No opinion
by MEPs, their staff andtoParliament staff It is neither
at eventsrepresentatives better,
and activities organised nor worse
bytolobbyists
- Any lobby meeting measures
held by theare necessary
Permanent ensure that
Representations all
oninterest
EU decision-making matters with a view influencing the EU decis
Any participation in official
No Parliament
opinion intergroups and unofficial cross-party
It is groups
better which organise events inside the Parli
- Any lobby meeting held by staff from the European Recently
External
published
Action Services,
research by high-level
ALTER representative
EU (http://alter-eu.org/documents/201
Federica Mogherini an
[1] http://www.transparencyinternational.eu/2015/10/joint-letter-for-a-mandatory-eu-lobby-register/
Yes It is better
European Council, the Council,Yes and member states
Yet even if all of these incentives are implemented, The
they
EUwill
institutions lead No
still only should aopinion
to workde facto
to ensure
mandatory
loopholes
register.
are closed
There by
remains
any agree
a pr
Any lobby meeting held by President Donald Tusk, members of his Cabinet, and staff from the secretariat
Yes No opinion
Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat of the Council
The
minute
Any lobbyyoumeeting
make the Yes by the permanent representations
held We think they on should parNo opinion matters
EU decision-making
Any lobby meeting held by staff from the European
The European
ExternalCouncil
Action Services,
and Council
high-level
are significant
representative
EU institutions
Federicaand
Mogherin
importa

However, it is important to
Yes
remember that even if However,
all of theseif there
incentives
is no are
likelihood
It implemented,
is neither
thatbetter,
these
theynor
bodies
will still
willonly
joinlead
the register,
to a de facto
the Cm
By imposing registration Yes No opinion

By putting too many condYes Similar patterns of infor It is better


Yes It is necessary for the u It is worse

No opinion It is neither better, nor

Yes It is better
No opinion It is better
No It is neither better, nor worse
Organisations on the tra Yes We include the Council i No opinion
No opinion No opinion
No comment No opinion Our view on this would dIt is neither better, nor
No opinion No opinion
No opinion It is better
No opinion It istoneither
Participation of the Council the TRbetter, nor worse
is welcome as long as it can be done w
The current TR is de fac Yes The Council is
Participation offormed ofItnational
the Councilistoneither
the ministers,
TRbetter, nor
their participation
is welcome as long as it would
can becreate
done wp
The current TR is de fac Yes The Council is formed ofItnational
is neither
ministers,
better, nor
their participation would create p
There should be a distincYes BUT only if this would No opinion

No opinion No opinion
Yes of course. The Transp
Yes We completely agree on No
i opinion

Yes It is neither better, nor worse

No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better

It is regrettable that the European Council and Council are not part of the reg
Yes No opinion
Yes Le
Meeting with EC officials, participation in expert orThe CNB
advisory se positionne
register
groups, enIt isthe
shouldparticipation
include neither better,
European
at official nor of the Council
events
Council, EU institutions,
of the EUPartici
and
Unregistered lobby orga Yes Only General SecretariatNo opinion
Nevertheless we believeNo opinion
that the most efficient and
In case
practical
this does
solution toItmake
is neither
notishappen, it the better, nor
is important
register worse
mandatory.
nonetheless that the European C
Yes No opinion
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
Interactions with other Yes Hill+Knowlton believes t It is neither better, nor
All interactions should b Yes No opinion

No opinion It is neither better, nor worse

Alle Angestellen der KomYes No opinion


Yes It is better

Yes No opinion
Die Eintragung sollte Be Yes No opinion
Yes We would welcome the conclusion It is better of an Interinstitutional Agreement, as the o
In principle, we think no access should be given to any official for lobbyingNo
Yes As long as lobbyists will be able
opinion
purpose towithout
reach out to legislators
being registered.from theare
There Council
surelyw
We also realize that this Yes
is a rule easier to enforce The
to staff
Council
members
is a keythan
par to
It is
elected
better
Interactions with lobbying organisations that should be made conditional upon prior registration, should include: politicians.
- Any meeting with anyNo opinion
Commission official It is neither better, nor
- Attendance by Commission No officials and their staff in any "expert group", It is"think
bettertank", "market access group" or any other c
The - All meetings
Register with be
should Members
Yes of Parliament or their
m staff
We believe the register No opinion
Wir- Events
sind derinMeinung, dass inorganised
the Parliament der Zwischenzeit, bevor ein gesetzlich verpflichtendes Lobbyregister in Kraft tritt, die folgenden
by lobbyists
- Attendance by Members of Parliament and their staff in any "expert group", "think tank", "market access group" or any othe
Europische Yes No opinion
- All social Kommission:
events set up for the purpose of discussing policy issues
- jedwede
- EventsLobbytreffen mit Kommissionsangestellten
held by the President of the Council, members of his Cabinet and their staff
- jedwede
- EventsPartizipation an
NoExpertInnen-Gruppen,
held by the general opinion Beratungsgruppen und Marktzugangsgruppen
secretariat of the Council It is neither better, nor worse
- jedweder Auftritt von Kommissionsangestellten
Yes
- Events held by the permanent representations onKommissarInnen
und EU matters aufNo Veranstaltungen,
opinion die von LobbyisInnen organisiert s
- Events held by the European
Yes External Action Negotiators
The
Services,
CouncilFederica
of the
at the level
EU,
Mogherini
as Nothe
of opinion
and her are
Council Cabinet
representatives of member states a
Europisches Parlament:
We think the current scopNo It is better
- alle Treffen von MdEPs und ihren MitarbeiterInnen, sowie MitarbeiterInnen des Parlaments, mit LobbyistInnen
- alle Treffen auf dem Gelnde des Parlaments, die von LobbyistInnen organisiert sind
- jedwede Partizipation von YesMdEPs, deren MitarbeiterInnen und MitarbeiterInnen It is better
des Parlaments bei Veranstaltungen und Akt
-Actually
jedwede I consider that inYes
Partizipation offiziellen Intergroups des I consider everyund
Parlaments EUinoffiziellen
instiIt is neither better, nor Gruppen, die Veranstaltunge
berparteilichen
The Council and European Council should also join the register, and hence should also look into implementing incentives for lo
Europarat, Rat, und Mitgliedsstaaten
Yes It is neither better, nor
-Registration
jedwede Lobbytreffen
is already mit Prsident
required for anDonald
access Tusk,
badge Mitgliedern
to the seines
European Kabinetts
Parliament und Angestellten
for example, but des
we Sekretariat
believe that theand
institutio
meet officials of the three main institutions (European Commission, European Parliament, Council), organise events, parti
- jedwede Lobbytreffen mit dem Sekretariat des Rates
Yes No opinion
-Wejedwede
believeLobbytreffen der Stndigen
that registration should be Vertretungen
a requirementzu forThemen,
access to dieCommission
EU Entscheidungsprozesse
expert groups and beinhalten
advisory groups or Europea
- jedwede Lobbytreffen mit Angestellten des Europischen Auswrtigen Dienstes, der hohen Vertreterin Federica Mogherini un
Meetings with
Mandatory any officiinYes
registration the Transparency Register It isfor
neither better, nor
Commission, Council and Parliament officials should should also be required
avoid attending events organised organisations and bodies
by lobbyists participation
that have in stake
not registered, if
Es ist wichtig zu betonen,Yes dass selbst wenn all diese Anreize durchgesetztNo opinionsie doch nur zu einem quasi-verpflichtende
werden,
The European Commission's Yes policy of not meeting Der Europische
unregistered Rat undNo
lobbyists shouldopinion
be extended to cover all Commission officials
Yes Sous rserve de respecte It is better
Members of the European YesParliament should be under We believe,
the obligation
as stated to abIt
list their
is neither
interactions
better, nor
with lobby groups, and to refuse m
Good practices or lessonsFinallearned
comments
at the
orEU
ideas
Member
Publication
on anyState
additional
oflevel
yourto
co
subjects
beJustification:
considered,
that youorconsider
pitfalls to
important
be avoided.
in the
(Optional)
context
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
El Registro de TranspareAdjunto documento. I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
The UK Register of Consultant Lobbyists containsI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
The exclusion of law firms as contained in certai I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Lobbying persons and the Finanztransparenz (sourcI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
The situation is very di Take a look at the US fe I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
The transparency register itself is significantl I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
It depends on the national lobby registry, impor I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
It is not reasonable to oblige registrants to make I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
A UE deve criar uma poltica de harmonizao I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
l'un n'empche pas les arespecter l'avis des cit I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Je ne sais pas si a exi I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Soy escritor de un libro I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse Il serait idal que le r I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
In Portugal the problem iI also think that EU Ins I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
l'enregistrement journalieI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
The EU Transparency Register is now a vital part of the policy-making process.
Deutlicch besser und einfacher. Es ist zudem ko I agree to my contribution being published.
Across the whole European Union
The TR there
still are
hassix
some
Memberflaws States
which stem
who have
from mandatory
the fact thatregisters
not all major
at theinterest
national
representatives
level (Austria, ha
Ire
The first example is the UK
Making
where thetheRegister I mandatory
agree
definition to mywould
of interest contribution
neither being
representativeimprove published.
is so narrow
the status
thatquo
onlynor
1%solve
of organisations
the issue of and
dispri
Secondly, Lithuanias mandatory
The voluntary
registersystemI agree
excludes
has mostto my
worked contribution
interest givenbeing
so fargroups its
such published.
9000
asentries
businessin less
associations,
than 5 years.
trade unions, relig
Thirdly, in Slovenia, the definitions
Providing more
of interest I agree
incentives to my
representatives contribution
and creating being
anda targets are published.
strengthened fairly
checks
broadandbutsanctions
the registration
systemitself
would
exclude
help
I agree to my contribution being published.
Publicit du registre : I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Vereinfachter Zugang f I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
There is no existing Lobby register in Italy (at I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Nationales Register in sterreich ist mir nicht be I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I don't know anything about lobbying in my membe I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
none of those archieve wh
This survey is a joke an I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Engage in discussions wI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Se a Europa no incluir partidos e outros vai s I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
There is no comparable register in Denmark. I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
There is a fine balance bI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
We very much welcome Ithe agree to my contribution
opportunity being
to contribute published.
to this consultation as we find participation in the
Not aware of the availab I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I suspect better but can The use of the word mand I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Due to lacking transparen
As stated above: Since lI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Germany does not have such a register so that i I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I don't know, but member state level politics is I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree toprocess.
It is good to see this consultation my contribution
Howeverbeing
it willpublished.
be important that the process of the inter-ins
I agree to my contribution being published.
It is useful for national Finally, all EU institutionsI should
agree to
conduct
my contribution
regular reviews
being published.
of their transparency rules and the way in w
I agree to my contribution being published.
It is good to see this consultation process. However it will be important that the process of the inter-ins
I agree to my contribution being published.
Finally, all EU institutionsI should
agree to my contribution
conduct being published.
regular reviews of their transparency rules and the way in w
The situation at Member I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I'm not sure that there a See above, this is a feebI agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
It is disappointing that this
It is
consultation
good to seehas I agree
thisconfined itselftoprocess.
consultation tomy contribution
only look
However being
at good willpublished.
it practice
be important
in the EUthat
when
thethere
process
are of
well-known
the inter-ins
a
I agree to my contribution being published.
ALTER-EU considers that Finally,
the EUallinstitutions
EU institutions
should
I should
agree
set best
toconduct
my
practice
contribution
regular
standards
reviews
beingforpublished.
ofstrong
their transparency
transparencyrules
requirements
and the way
to serve
in w
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
all Commission and EP an I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
Przede wszystkim zastanI agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Liste wre zu lang. All I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
In many capitals or national, regional or local authI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Prepte na vinu otI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
In Portugal, there are no register about the lob I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
It chages a lot from country to country I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Tha main pitfall to be av The link to the Specific I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
In Ireland a working system like the Transparenc I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree
Ik ben niet op de hoogte van de lobbyregisters van to my contribution
de lidstaten. being
Ik weet alleen ietspublished.
van Nederland en van de rest weet ik weini
Mijn mening over het Nederlandse lobbyregistersI isagree
dat het
to my
eencontribution
wassen neus being
is. Ik
published.
hoop dat het nieuwe EU register meer bod
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Comme tout ce qui a traiSi les institutions EU ne I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
An old issue is the fact In the case of indirect I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Danmark har ikke et etableret sammenligneligt loI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
In sterreich ist die Ei Die BAK begrt den vorI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Italy lacks a proper law concerning lobbying and I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Most EU national systems are poor, have too many
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
V rog s ne ajutai s I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Mutual Recognition Agr I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Sweden does not have any regulation or registratio
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
The whole business of prI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
This consultation processI agree to my contribution
is a positive being
step in the right published.
direction, however it is important that the inter-
I agree to my contribution being published.
Finally, all EU institutionsI should
agree to conduct
my contribution
regular reviews
being published.
of their transparency rules and the way in w
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Regulating lobbying can be effective only if it involves I agree both
to lobbyists and decision
my contribution makers. Good practice should ensure obliga
being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Pecuniary sanctions are absolutely necessary to ensure effective compliance with the registry. In Italy, a number of Regions ha
I agree to my contribution being published.
Please also find a position It ispaper
goodintoItalian
see this our Irecommendations
agree toprocess.
on consultation my contribution
However being
it willpublished.
for a mandatory belobby
important
registry
thattothe
beprocess
adoptedofinthe
Italy,
inter-ins
http:/
I agree to my contribution being published.
It's really
Additionally, in Italy thereFinally,
is some allvery good as
confusion thetoI the
EU institutions agree
should to my contribution
definition
conduct
of aregular
lobbyistsbeing
and published.
reviews whether
of their transparency
it includes non-professional
rules and the way lobbyist
in w
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
It is disappointing that this
It is
consultation
good to seehas I agree
thisconfined itselftoprocess.
consultation tomy contribution
only look
However being
at good willpublished.
it practice
be important
in the EUthatwhenthethere
process
are of
well-known
the inter-insa
Rendere obbligatorio il r Sarebbe necessario che Ii agree to my contribution being published.
CEO considers that the EU Finally,
institutions
all EU institutions
should setI best
should
agreepractice
toconduct
my contribution
standards
regular reviews
for
being
strongpublished.
of transparency
their transparencyrequirements
rules andtothe
serve
wayas in an
w
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
It is good to see this consultation process. However it will be important that the process of
the inter-institutional agreement which follows is also conducted openly; previous
processes have been farI too opaque.
agree to my Meetings of the
contribution high-level
being published.working group of the
European Commission, Parliament and Council that will discuss
I agree to my contribution being published. the new IIA should be
open to the public and web-streamed. The draft agreement, proposed changes, agendas
I agree to my contribution being published.
and minutes should be made available online promptly.
Die
Finally, all EU institutionsI should
hier wiedergegebenen agree to my contribution
conduct being published.
regular reviews of their transparency rules and
I agree to my contribution
the way in which they are implemented so as to constantly being published.
strive for better and more
The EU should set best practice
comprehensive
As statedstandards
throughout I contribution
agree
transparency.
for our
strong to my contribution
transparency
This would
to include,
this being
requirements
but published.
notto
consultation, beserve
limited
as to,
BUSINESSEUROPEan the
example
EU lobby
for members
fully shares the politica
states transparency register. I agree to my contribution being published.
The European TransparencThe business communityI supports
agree to my
mostcontribution
elements of being
the ETI,
published.
but also recalls that too many transparen
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Participation in EU deb The subject of the lobbi I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Die Beteiligung am Konsu I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Simplicity is key. The The whole focus of this cI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Further important changes beyond the legally binding lobby register are required:
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
Improved monitoring of the data entries, as lobbyists frequently enter inaccurate or even frivolous d
In our opinion it is imp AllImproved
Europeansanctions
institutiontoI punish
agree to my contribution
inaccurate being published.
or misleading information, such as through suspension fro
I agree to my contribution
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting being published.
with unregistered lobbyists and should obli
Lobby rules should apply I agree
alsototomy
thecontribution being published.
European Council, the Council of Ministers and Permanent Re
DIe USA sind strikter un ITCO welcome the realisation I agreeofto my contribution
a mandatory being published.
transparency register. The coming into existence of a m
I agree to my contribution being published.
The mandatory characterI agreeof the to
register should be being
my contribution realised by on the one hand suspending privileges
published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
In the IIA 2014, it is stated that: to my contribution being published.
I agree
Article 35. The European Council and the Council are invited to join the register. Other EU institutions
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse ITCO suggests that otherI agree to my contribution
EU institutions, bodies and being published.
agencies are encouraged to use the framework
I agree to my contribution being published.
We recommend includingI agree to my contribution
a connection between the being published.Register and the legislative footprin
Transparency
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
We would welcome an open
I agree
Pour viter toutes surcharges to my contribution
administratives, being published.
les performances du registre pourraient tre amliore
Comme indiqu tout au long I agree
de notre
to my contribution
contribution being
cettepublished.
consultation, le MEDEF partage pleinement
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
La France s'orientant vers un registre obligatoire,I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
At a member state level, we should prevent too mu I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Concerning
A lobby EU Directive migLobby is a misused termiIMember
national experiences, the majority of agree toStates that feature
my contribution a registration
being published.system have chosen the mandatory
better and more succesfull. often it is easier to g I agree to my contribution being published.
The specificity of various entities is recognised byI means
agree toofmy
exemptions
contributionor specific provisions - with different rationales and in
being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Concerning rather more negative experiences, in the UK, the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-party Campaigning and Trade U
As in Spain the Transparency register has only juI agree to my contribution being published.
Going beyond EU borders, as encouraged by theI recent agree to my contribution
public hearing on thebeing published.
topic, the seminal experience of the American le
Too difficult to answer a There should be a mandat I agree to my contribution being published.
Essentially, European and international experiences I agree
showtothat
my the
contribution
specificity
being
of certain
published.
entities, including Churches and religio
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
guidance on how to fill out
legislation.
registration and the objectives of the register to both lobbyists and public

officials. The office provides


A number
personalised
of Member
advice
States
to registrants,
have already
including
taken at
initiative
the timeto of
require
registration
the publication
to of some level of

ensure complete disclosures


documentation,
and approves
providing
registrations
a light only
formwhen
of a legislative
it is satisfied
footprint,
that registrations
including: Austria,
are Cyprus, Estonia,

accurate and complete and


France,
registrants
Lithuania,
havethe
certified
Netherlands,
the to
I agree accuracy
Poland
my ofand
theirSlovenia.
contribution registrations. The office
being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
also conducts investigations On the andintegrity
sanctions side lobbyists
better guidancewhere necessary.for EU officials
In case and of MEPs
violations on how (non- to deal with lobbyist is
I agree to my contribution being published.
The Lobbying
registration (Scotland)
mostly) Act
are 2016
thereneeded. Aintroduces
financial strongsanctions,
Code a mandatory
ofIpublic
agree
Conduct to register
my
naming-and-
of the but
contribution the Schedule
Transparency
shaming being and in of
published.
Register Section
severe applying
cases1.i(iv) specifically
to lobbyists excludes
should be any
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
COSLA
even is an association
convictions based
in courtcomplemented
that
Nothing can on public
lead
further toby law in Scotland.
toimprisonment.
a Code
add of Conduct
I agree toThe
my for organisation
officials. being
contribution itself is not named in statute of Scotland or the UK
published.
Je
In apense
Danish qu'il devraitlobbying
context, meMettre is en avant aussi and
self-regulated l I agree
although to my contribution
introduction abeing
lobbypublished.
Neither
Obligation thetoUK or Scottish
publish meetingsParliament
Finally, with transparency
the high-ranking
Commission publicstandards
should officials
launch treat
in us asoflobbyists
a discussion
Canada liesonwiththe
register
nor expect
lobbyists.
equality
is sometimes
us
ofThey to be As
access.
discussed
register in the
TIs analysis
in same
the publ
of thereg
The Danish PR Association which is associated toI agree
DI has toestablished
my contribution an being
ethical published.
code on
From a UK-wide perspective, the EU Transparency Register certainly excels in scope andprinciples
its pool offor good lobbyism:
registrants in comparison http://g
COSLA, DI fully supports the po I agree to my contribution being published.
have to file or indeed ourmeetings
communication sister
reportsorganisations
between in other
detailinghigh-level
who they Member
met and States,
European whatdoes
onCommission topic.not Thecarry
officials for
withprofit
information activities
lobbyists
that showed nor its engagement
- 75% of all wit
Wetransparency
The do not have register
any privatehas or voluntary
another body within
advantage I in
agree
thatour to
it my contribution
membership.
covers all forms being
of published.
lobbying whether indirect or direct and it covers
Governments have gravitated towards the idea of a lobby register as a quick-fix solution to regulating
is published is not too dissimilar meetings to have
the reports
been taken I agree
publishedplaceby towith
mythe contribution
representatives
European being
Commission published.
of the
We have a public law For thisand
statute reason,
our on the
employees transparency
are bound side,
by a move
same the towards
terms and acorporate
since sector.
legislative
conditions
At the
footprint
of municipal
same time large
a comprehensive
government pu
emp
Finally, we appreciate that A number of Member States have already taken initiative to require the publication ofaccess
organisations can register for free and have access to a range of benefits such as to the
I agree to my contribution being published. some level ofEudo
December 2014, but everything variations
On the
Economic is available
between
integrity
inequalityside portfolios
on a Icentral
better
has agree have
guidance
grown website
to become
toengagement
my for
extreme in
EU open
apparent.
contribution data
officials
levels. Abeing
and(machine
Whereas
recent published.
MEPsreport readable)
theby
on Health
howOxfamto and
deal Environment
with
entitled lobbyist
AN is
ECONOMY needed F
Our
The employees are
Transparency We
directly
Register are committed
accountable to transparent
to an elected member assembly with policy-makers,
for from
the exercise adhering to high
of its representational standards of
roles with integ
th
DerdoesGDV
Finally, thehave
hat its limitations
sich
Commission mit einIshould andlaunch
agree it could
to adraw
my contribution lessons
discussion being
on the the Registers
published.
equality in theAs
of access. UKTIs
to analysis
enhance transp
of the m
format that has a great search
better, nor worse portfolios function
have and a 50/50must balance
Ibe updated
agree between
to my monthly.
meetings
contributionReportingwith industry
being is simplified and by other stakeholders, a the areas oft
In
comparison
AsCOSLA
mentioned to the lobby
is a throughout
nominating In
For this
body
this
context,
registers
us, a sound
of thefound
consultation,
Oxfam
framework
inthe
European the International
EU for
Member
Committee
fact that relations welcomes
ofStates,
the
the Transparencywith
RegionstheEU
interest
the European
and
Register ispublished.
Transparency Commissions
representatives
responsible
is not mandatoryRegister
includes initiative
outlines
freedom
for providing
and
for
a not
broad
for mandatory
secretarial
does all definition
have stakehol
and pol
a syst
I agree to my contribution being published.
drop-down menus that greatly Financial
For facilitate
this Markets
reason, toonidentify
andtheisDigitalall meetings
transparencyEconomy onare
side, aagiven
completely
move topic.
towards Additionally,
dominated (90/10)
ademocratically
legislativethe footprint
by corporate actors. This pu
a undermines
comprehensive
We arelimitation
Another already of formally The protection
registered
the transparency of
theprofes
inregister Committee I agree
its oftothe
statutory my contribution
Regions
code being
as official
of conduct published.
and
because it lowers the accountable
bar and representativ estab
most senior public servants shows are that
subject I agree to my contribution being published.
Finally, whata is more
to a strategic
needed lobbying
isI a approach
ban of fivetoyears
multi-pronged stakeholder
after to
strategy leaving
consultation
rebalanceoffice.power is needed
within to
thethat it is not itsonly
isEU
whyand member
Finally, the issue of financial disclosure is unworkable agree andtodoesmy contribution
nothing to improve
being published.
transparency, which neither transpas
- mandatory public lobby registries and stronger rules on conflicts of interest;
The US has a strong mandatory those
- ensuring withsystem
the most
that as well:
good resources
qualityquarterly
I agree that
tofinancial
information myget contribution
their
on reporting
voices beingheard
administrative provipublished.
in
and Brussels.
budget processes is made public, and i
It is disappointing that this - reform
consultation
of the regulatory
has confined I agree
environment,to my contribution
itself to onlyparticularly
look at good being
around published.
practice
transparency
in the EU in when
government;
there are well-known a
- cooling
As statedperiods
throughout to closeourI contribution
agree to my
revolving doorscontribution
to between
this being published.
big business
consultation, and government.
the Federation of Enterprises in Belgium fu
Oxfam maintains that thetransparency.
-and
EU institutions
launch a discussion should set I on
agree
best
the topractice
equality
my contribution
standards
of access being to
fordevelop
strong
published.
transparency
a more strategic requirements
approach to serve stakehold as a
The European Transparenc I agree to my contribution being published.
It is good to see this consultation process. However it will be important that the process of the inter-ins
Governments have gravitated towards theagendas
idea of abeing lobby register as a quick-fix
be madesolution
I agree to my contribution published. toonline
regulating
The draft agreement, proposed changes, and minutes should available prom
For this reason, on the transparency side, a move towards of their transparency rules and the way in pu
a legislative footprint a comprehensive
It is disappointing that Finally, all EU institutionsI should agree to conduct
my contribution
regular reviews being published. w
A number of Member States have already taken initiative to require the publication of some level of do
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
On the integrity side better guidance for EU officials and MEPs on how to deal with lobbyist is needed
Depende de Estado-membro Finally, paratheEstado-membro.
Commission should I agree launchto my contribution
a discussionbeing on the published.
equality of access. As TIs analysis of the m
TI has carried out a number of in-depth studies into I agree to my contribution
international best-practice being published.
of national lobbying regulation. The 2015 Lobb
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
internationale NGOs mit IECOSOC agree to my contribution
Status in der UNO being undpublished.
als Partnerorganisation in der EU-Grundre
Zum Beispiel hat die international I agree tottige my contribution
NGO-Organisation being published.Verein zur Frderung der Vlkerverstndig
I agree to my contribution being published.
A mandatory transparency I agree to my contribution being published.
No sufficient informatio No sufficient informatio I agree to my contribution being published.
Our final comments concern the to duty
myof confidentiality of published.
a solicitor and the chosen legal basis of the n
I agree contribution being
The duty of confidentiality is one of the core principles of the legal profession. In a joint declaration on
Sverige har inget lobbyr Ytterligare
The Societyinformationacknowledges I agree
that atoclient
my contribution
may waive being published.
confidentiality so that a solicitor could continue to r
For lawyers and law firmsI agree establishedto my in contribution
Brussels, both beingthe published.
Flemish-Speaking Brussels Bar (Nederlan
Since an increasing number I agree of lawto my firmscontribution
employ lawyers being published.
from different jurisdictions, these firms deal w
It is important to note t We understand the circumstances I agree to my leading
contribution
the Commissionbeing published.to choose an inter-institutional agreement
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Hierfr fehlt uns eine ausreichende Expertise. In I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Clarification in the me I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
SEAP supports a mandatory Transparency Register that will help create a level-playing field across th
Compared against international - Anbest-practice
effective the EU Transparency to Register is
allahead in some influencing
areas, but lacks behind in a ma
En faisant
TI has uneout
carried rapide comparaison
a number of in-depth lesystem
avecstudies nouveau
into
that continues
registre
internationalnational motivate
des reprsentants
best-practice of
organisations
national dintrts,
lobbying cre par EUladecision-making
regulation. loi Sapin,
The 2015 actuel
Lobb
Tout dabord, comme les - institutions
Coverage of all EU institutions
europennes, les involved
franais ontineuthedespolitical decision-making,
difficults dfinir le including
concept de the
lobby Council
et de an
gro
The
There seven EUquality
are big Member States
ditemps, Athat
-tous have
robust specific
system withIlobbying
agree
better regulations
toofficial
mydevront (Austria,
contribution
definitions, being France,
monitoringpublished.Ireland,
proceduresLithuania, Poland, Slovenia
and sanctions that encoura
Dans un premier
A positive example is Slovenia,
Governments les reprsentants
where definitions
have gravitated dintrts
of both towards
lobbying theand senregistrer
idealobbied
of a lobby targets sils
register veulent
are fairly rencontrer
as a broad,
quick-fix des
although ministres,
solutiontheto latter fails m
des
regulating
Puis les lobbies devront communiquer I agree to myclients,
contribution beingles published.
On paper, these agenciesFor have
this reason, on les
close-to-adequate thenoms de leurs
transparency
enforcement side,
powers. et indiquer
a move Thetowards sources
lack ofacapacity, de
asdocuments
legislative footprint et chiffres
well as lobbying
a comprehensive
not beingquilsapu
prp
En ce quibest
International concerne le number
practice
A contenuEurope:
beyond ofduMember
registre,States
lesI agreehave to already
lobbyistes mydevront
contribution
fournir
taken being published.
des informations
initiative to require thedtailles
publicationsurofleurs
some activits
level ofetdol
Canada has a mandatoryOn lobby
the integrity
register with side an I
better agree
independent to my contribution
guidance authority
for EU officials being
overseeingand MEPs published.
it. Theon Canadian
how to dealOffice
with
oflobbyist
the Commissione
is needed
Il est intressant
Obligation de voir
to publish quen France
meetings
Finally, with linscriptionpublic
the high-ranking
Commission I au
should registre
agree to myest
officials
launch a obligatoire
contribution
in discussion
Canada lies et
being mme
onwiththe contraignante
published.
lobbyists.
equality ofThey
access.devant
have As la loi
toTIs
file pour tous
analysis
communication lesm
of the
The US has a strong mandatory system as well: quarterly I agree tofinancial
my contribution
reportingbeingprovides published.
almost real-time updates; and lawyers p
Pour en savoir plus :
I agree to my contribution being published.
http://www.gouvernement.fr/argumentaire/loi-sapin-2-transparence-lutte-contre-la-corruption-modernisation-de-l-economie-420
it will be important that the I agree
processto my contribution
of the being published.
inter-institutional agreement which follows is also conducted
Finally, all EU institutions I should
agree to
conduct
my contribution
regular reviews
being published.
of their transparency rules and the way in w
https://positions.contexte.com/lab/positions/app/#%2Fprojet-de-loi-sapin-2-les-parlementaires-ont-considerablement-enrichi-le
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
https://www.contexte.com/article/pouvoirs/la-commission-des-lois-muscle-le-registre-des-representants-dinterets-sapin2_5195
A key feature of the EU register
EPACA that has is since
oftenlong I agree
overlooked
been tonational
my of
in favour
in contribution
registersbeing
a mandatory thatpublished.
is register. it includes
We understand
all sorts ofand
stakeholders
respect thewhich Comm g
Some national registers seemGiven to the include
currentcertain
situation,
policy-makers
I agree
we would
to mylikeactive
contribution
to make
in Brussels
the
being register
in
published.
theireven
scope.
more Wedearefacto
concerned
mandatory that wethroug
are
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
In Finland there is no lo We fully agree with the I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
No sufficient informatio ESTA believes that any oI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Compared against international best-practice the IEU Transparency
agree Registerbeing
to my contribution is ahead in some areas, but lacks behind in a ma
published.
The seven EU Member States that have specific lobbying regulations (Austria, France, Ireland, Lithuania, Poland, Slovenia an
It is good to see I agree toprocess.
thisgravitated
consultation my contribution
However being willpublished.
it targetsbe important that thealthough
process oftothe inter-ins
A positive example is Slovenia,
Governments where definitions
have of both towards
lobbying theandidea lobbied
of a lobby register
are fairly
as a broad,
quick-fix solutionthe latter
regulating
fails
On paper, these agencies For have
thisclose-to-adequate I
reason, on the transparency agree to
enforcementmy contribution
side,
powers.
a move The being
lack published.
towards ofacapacity,
legislative
as footprint
well as lobbying
a comprehensive
not being apup
International best practice Finally,
A number
beyond all Europe:
EUMember
of institutions I should
States agree
have to my contribution
conduct
already regular being published.
reviews
taken initiative of require
to their transparency
the publicationrulesofand
somethelevel
way ofin do
w
Canada has a mandatoryOn lobby
the integrity
register with side an I
better agree
independent to my contribution
guidance authority
for EU officials being
overseeingand MEPs published.
it. Theon Canadian
how to dealOffice
with
oflobbyist
the Commissione
is needed
Obligation to publish meetings
Finally,with the high-ranking
Commission public should
I agreeofficials
launch
to my contribution
in
a discussion
Canada lies being
onwiththepublished.
lobbyists.
equality ofThey access.
haveAs toTIs
file analysis
communication of the m
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
As stated above, clear rules I agreeandtotheir
my actual
contribution being published.
enforcement are key. The Joint Transparency Register S
in qualit di cittadino
Governments e I agree
have gravitated to my contribution
towards the idea of abeing lobbypublished.
register as a quick-fix solution to regulating
better, nor worse Volkswagen furthermore Isuggests agree to establishing
my contribution an advisory
being published. body to the Secretariat. It goes without sa
Compared against international
For thisbest-practice
reason, on the thetransparency
IEU Transparency
agree to myside, aRegister
move towards
contribution is ahead
being a legislative
in some areas,
published. footprint
but lacks
a comprehensive
behind in a ma pu
TI has carried out a number of in-depth studies into international best-practice
I agree to my contribution being published. of national lobbying regulation. The 2015 Lobb
The seven EU Member States A number that ofhaveMember
specificStates
lobbying
haveregulations
already taken (Austria,
initiativeFrance,
to requireIreland,
the Lithuania,
publicationPoland,
of some Slovenia
level of an
do
I agree to my contribution being published.
A positive example is Slovenia, where definitions of both lobbying and lobbied targets are fairly broad, although the latter fails
On paper, these agencies Onhavethe integrity
close-to-adequate
side better I agree to myfor
enforcement
guidance contribution
powers.
EU officialsThe being
and published.
lack MEPs
of capacity,
on how astowell
deal
aswith
lobbying
lobbyist
notisbeing
needed ap
LUEL partage
International best practice beyond Europe: pleinement I agree to my contribution being published.
Canada has a mandatoryFinally, lobby register
the Commission I agree launch
with an independent
should to myauthority
contribution
a discussion being
overseeingon the published.
it.equality
The Canadian
of access.Office
As of
TIsthe
analysis
Commissioneof the m
Obligation to publish meetings with high-ranking public I agreeofficials
to my contribution
in Canada lies being withpublished.
lobbyists. They have to file communication
Any stakeholder registerI agree to my contribution being published.
Wir begren den Prozess I agree to my contribution
der Konsultation being
zu sehen. published.
Aber es wird umso wichtiger sein, dass der kom
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to myregelmige
Letztlich sollten alle EU-Institutionen contribution berprfungen
being published. ihrer Transparenzregeln und der da
Es ist enttuschend, das I agree to my contribution being published.
Iberdrola believes that the I agree to my contribution
introduction of increasedbeing published.
transparency will add fairness, more accuracy and
Currently in Spain, there I agree to my contribution being published.
First of all, the idea of a public
I agreeconsultation is great,being
to my contribution aboutpublished.
anything (legitimate).
The EU needs to be a reference again, as we see sceptisism
I agree to my contribution being published. and anti-EU movements spreading all a
The EU must be aware of it's own limitations (competences, political interests and above all, budget)
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
Without money (Budget) the only available political activity is regulation.
To me, regulation must I agree
walk to mythe
towards contribution
approaching being published.
of EU Institutions to the
the political
people, objectives
and so to impro
Good practices or lessons As stated throughout
learned at EU Member ourIScontribution
agree to to this consultation,
my contribution being CIP fully shares
published. of th
Transparency is an international political issue, parties and
However, it is critical of over-burdensome reporting requirements, unnecessary Governments all around Europe are talkin
So, regulationand on lobbying: I agree to my
it exists butcontribution
it has to be being
improvedpublished.
and updated, so EU Institutions be a refe
bureaucracy, unintended negative side-effects.
I'm from Spain. Thanks for the attention! I agree to my contribution being
The business community supports most elements of the ETI, but also recalls published.
Dans la mesure du possible,
that EURALIAtransparency
too plaide pour I agree to my contribution being undermine
published. genuine
- Themany
Transparency Register requirements
should apply can to
ultimately
all the European institutions having legislative powers
The European Transparency UNESPA deems
transparency.
Register that theI re
agree to my contribution being published.
- Not all thegoes
burdenfurther in itsbereporting
should requirementsCivil
put on stakeholders. servants and representatives should also
than almost all national registers.
- There is between
All meetings no register
I agree in Portugal.
to my contribution
stakeholders being should
and EU officials published.
be published.
The EU and Member States - undertake different ap
I agree to my contribution
Data on the Transparency Register should be correctly being published.
checked.
EFAMA does not have any experience
-ThereThere withno
should
is currently lobbyi
be I agree
hard
proper legaltobasis
sanctions mytocontribution
prevent beingand
non-respect
for the Register published.
offortiori,
a the mandatory Transparency
any mandatory Register.
Register should
I agree to my contribution being published.
We think that it is not satisfactory in the future for the JTRS to be judge and party in any future manda
We are not sure that the IInternetagree toismy thecontribution
correct setting beingfor published.
all the information that is requested as it cou
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Many countries have decided to implement lobbying I agree
rulestoandmy guidelines
contributionwith being published.
registers as a key component of their transparen
I agree to my contribution being published.
Ein verpflichtendes Register wrde fr deutsche Rechtsanwlte zu praktischen Problemen fhren, da
I agree to my contribution being published.
Die BRAK hebt hervor, dass I agree ein to my contribution
verbindliches beingunter
Register published.
die Bedingung klarer Definitionen und ei
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Dans certains pays, tels BASE propose que les ass I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Le projet de loi portant sur la transparence, la lutte I agree
contretolamy contribution
corruption, et labeing published.de la vie conomique va faire vol
modernisation
Nous rappelons la ncessit d'avoir un systme mlant I agreetransparence
to my contributionet efficacit
being published.
du travail de reprsentation.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Der sterreichische RecI agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse As stated throughout ourI contribution
agree to myto contribution being published.
this consultation, wefully shares the political objectives of the
I agree to my contribution being published.
The business communityI supports agree to my most contribution
elements of being
the ETI,
published.
but also recalls that too much transparen
WWF recommends that the I agree to my contribution being published.
Pour viter toutes surcharges I agree to my contribution
administratives, being published.
les performances du registre pourraient tre amliore
I agree to my contribution being published.
Pour viter toutes surch I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Whilst there are few examples
better, nor worse AccessinInfothe Europe
European welcomes
Union ofthis
developed
consultationlobbyprocess,
transparency
and looks registers,
forward thetoUStheand
feedback
Canada toboth
be prov
are
It
Theis important
Transparency to underline
Registerthat legally-binding
is already a role modelandI agree
mandatory
for many to my contribution
register
registers does
at thebeing
not
EUmean published.
Member automatically that lobbying level.
State and third-country will beShifting
transp
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
In any case, the EU institutions The Commission
should implement
should ensure
lobby regulation
that the inter-institutional
rules that meet agreement
internationalprocess
standards is conducted
with strong astranspar
openly
Therefore, it is important to (in contrary with
Geelmuyden Kiese will continue the efforts to encourage Polish regulation):
I agree to
themy contribution being
establishment published. registers at the national level. The
of transparency
1. built the register using open data standards; I agree to my contribution being published.
Access Info notes that inFinally, many countries
all EU institutions
across the should
EU it regularly
is possible review
to obtain
EU transparency
documents about rules lobbying,
and their including
implementation
detailstomins
2.
weaggregate
do not have all alobbying Itinformation
is goodon
good overview tothe
see
in one
thiscentral
consultation
registers database
Ii agree toprocess.
mywhich However
will be the
contribution it new
beingwillpublished.
beversion
importantof thethat
transparency
the processregister
of the inter-ins
(the EU
3. introduce a system of effective and inevitable sanctions for lobbyists who do not comply with registration and disclosure obli
I agree to my contribution being published.
4. introduce a system of Finally,sanctions all for
EUEU institutions
officials who should do conduct
not comply regularwith reviews
their disclosure
of their transparency
obligations (as rules
the and
Polishtheexample
way in ws
5. introduction of a new anti-revolving door regulation I agree andtoamy bancontribution
on registering being as published.
a lobbyist and performing lobbying activities
Last but not least issue about I agree thetotransparency
my contribution beingispublished.
register that the register should contain not only bas
Legislative footprint: additionally,
Most importantly,
as in many it should I agree
countries,include to full
data myfromcontribution
information
the lobbying being
about published.
register
lobbying thatcontacts
is collectedandduring
activities,
communication
including datw
Additionally, it should - toI completeagree to my thecontribution
picture - cover being legislative
published. footprint and revolving door informati
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
In Ireland, the Register of Lobbying is mandatoryI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
The EU transparency register is very clear in ter I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
In the UK, the Office of the Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists (ORCL) and the Register of Consultant Lobbyists was set up follo
better, nor worse
At present the UK Register records the name of the I agree
lobbyingto myorganisation
contributionand beingthepublished.
name of their clients. It does not record who
I agree to my
Although it is mandatory for anyone who considers they are acting in a lobbying capacity contribution being published. (subject to certain exemptions such a
We also note that other than the avoidance of prosecution I agree tothere my contribution
is no benefit being
for apublished.
lobbying organisation to register with the UK
We would highlight the faI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
It is difficult to compar The intention of the tran I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse
FEDMA understands thatBeim many EP akkreditierte
different systems In I exist
agreeattonational
my contribution
level, butbeing published.
is supportive of the European mechanism of the T
An example
FEDMA of partial that
understands flexibility
FEDMA
manycan welcomes
be taken
different the
from
systems inten
I exist
the
agreeIrish
attonational
transparency
my contribution
level, butregister
being which
published.
is supportive provides the possibility
of the European for the organisa
mechanism of the T
We acknowledge the efforts made by the European Commission and the European Parliament to enh
An example of partial flexibilityFEDMA canwelcomes
be takenthe frominten
I the
agreeIrishtotransparency
my contribution register
beingwhich
published.
provides the possibility for the organisa
Nevertheless, there are still some issues that remain pending. For instance, the exclusion of the Coun
On the other hand, what Iconcerns agree to my contribution
us more being published.
is the influence of lobbies on European policy making. Eve
The public interest, as I
well agree
as to my
minorities contribution
or niche being published.
interests, may
A APECOM defende que, para a real proteo da sociedade, e adont find neither
credibilizao space
dos nor resource
agentes envolvid
Le
In Groupe
conclusion, La Poste
the parta
European I agree to my
institutions, contribution
in particular being
the published.
European
O Lobbying como ferramenta democrtica s funcionar se quem desenvolve estes processos Parliament, should find new dewaysrep
I agree to my contribution being published.
Mais se considera que a EU pode exercer um papel crucial nas recomendaes aos estados membr
Essas recomendaes so I agree to my contribution
particularmente being
relevantes published.
para a clarificao da atividade do lobby e de
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
The issue is not to compare the EU register with national registers of vice versa, but to achieve an efficient and reliable registe
awareness about such good practices should b I agree to my contribution being published.
Il
Inn'existe
order toactuellement
do so, we canLa protection
certainly learndesfromprinci
bothI agree
good and to my badcontribution
practices that being published.
exist in the EU member States, but also in othe
Civil Society Europe welcomes this consultation process published.
I agree to my contribution being and calls for an open and transparent decisio
better, nor worse
Certainly the mandatory dimension of the register,I agree to myofcontribution
the quality being published.
the data required, a sufficiently resourced secretariat to ensure
It is also important to include I agree in the
to myproposal
contribution
regular being
evaluation
published. and revision mechanisms so as to imp
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
The Joint Transparency Register compares favoura I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Vorschlag der Einrichtung eines to
I agree Beauftragten fr Interessenvertretung:
my contribution being published.
Die de'ge'pol schlgt vor,I begleitend zum Tranzparenzregister
agree to my contribution being published. eine/n Beauftrage/n fr Interessenvertr
better, nor worse - wahrt die Integritt der politischen Willensbildung als Wchter
I agree to my contribution being published. ber die Lauterkeit der Interessenvert
- wird selbst oder durch Beschwerden und Anregungen von Brgerinnen und Brgern ttig;
I agree to my contribution being published.
- kann sich bei der Erfllung seiner/ihrer Aufgaben auf eigene Ermittlungen und Anhrungen sttzen;
- rgt in Einzelfllen unzulssige I agree toFormen
my contribution being published.
und Handlungen bei der Interessenvertretung ffentllich und
La loi Sapin 2 va mettre en place un tel registre I agree to my contribution
- initiiert einen ffentlichen Diskurs ber Handlungsspielrume being published. und Grenzen der Interessenvertretung
I agree to my contribution being published.
Damit
The trgt die/der Register
Transparency Interessenbeaufragte
I agree
is antoalready
my contribution
dazu bei, being
Orientierung
well-developed published.
tool butinthere
der Flle der Informationen
is always aus de
room for improvemen
I agree to my contribution being published.
A general Transparency Portal I agreefor to the
my European
contribution institutions
being published.
should be set up where the citizen could h
I agree to my contribution being published.
A key feature of the EU register that is often overlooked in national registers is that it includes all sorts of stakeholders which g
Some national registers seemCambre to include
has since certain
long be policy-makers
I agree to my active
contribution
in Brussels
being in published.
their scope. We are concerned that we are
DIGITALEUROPE
In wishes
Italy, currently there isWe
notosuch
note register.
welcome that the
the consultation
EU institu
I agree
A legislative toa my
proposal
for contribution being published.
is beingTransparency
mandatory discussed in Register,
the Parliament.
which also would serve as a lea
In Germany, we would say that the TransparencyIRegister agree toismy neither
contribution
better, being
nor worse.
published.
We strongly believe the Transparency I agree to my contribution
Register hasbeing the potential
published. to be used proactively as a tool by th
I agree to my contribution being published.
Sarebbe utile ed interessI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
In comparison to Germany Lobbying should be made I agree to my contribution being published.
The EU Institutions have made a promise to by appropriate means, give citizens and representative a
The Greens/EFA
It's important alsogroup inI agree
the follow toEU
theupEuropean
of my decision-making
contribution
Parliamentbeing published.
welcomes
process: this consultation
after processhas
a policy proposal andbecome
is lookingla
De nombreux pays membres de l'UE n'ont pas de I agree
r to my
As developped by Professor Jonathan Zeitlin, 2009 - In thecontribution being published.
best of all worlds civil society participates
As mentioned above,
Complementing weI are
a mandatory agreecommitted to following
to my contribution
Transparency Register closely
being andEU
published.
for all the actively participating
institutions, and anineffective
the newEU inter-
Le
I agree to my contribution being published.
We hope that the inter-institutional I agree process
to my will be as participative
contribution and transparent as possible, and w
Es ist enttuschend, dass sich diese Befragung nur auf die Good Practices being published.
in Europa beschrnkt, wo es doch bekannte und g
Some countries such as Any F istdraft
Es for
gut,that a new
diesen inter I agree
Prozess der to my contribution being published.
As stated above, the EU We is relatively
hope transparent
the Council but
of theKonsultation
needsEuropean
to do much zu sehen.
Unionmore
will toAber
join ases
become wird
a full umso wichtiger
a member
leading force sein, dass
of theforregister,
transparency derin kom
including Eu
if p
The EU's
LobbyControl ist der Meinung, dass position
die EUinInstitutionen
relaI agree dem to myBest
contribution
Practice being
Prinzippublished.
folgen sollten und so starke Transparenzan
To date, there are several Letztlich
AsMember
we have sollten
States
arguedalle
that EU-Institutionen
above, I agree
regulate to myregelmige
we lobbying
believe contribution
that
to some
the systemberprfungen
being
extent, published.
ofwith
lobbying ihrer
7 having Transparenzregeln
transparency
fully-fledged,
needs und
specific,
to be deren
lobbying
radically
I agree to my contribution being published.
Other positive examples We include
alsoSlovenia
believe thatandreforms
Lithuania,
I agreeto the
to
which
my
Code
contribution
bothof have
Conduct an
being
independent
for MEPs
published.andoversight
for Commissioners
agency equipped
and EU with
official
stro

You might also like