Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Are you responding asI am a resident in (onl Please provide your ReName of the organisati
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 952322311484-70 EDSO FOR SMART GR
An individual in my pers Luxembourg
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 697519611807-33 Young Pirates of Europe
The representative of an organisation registered Europ6311034489 Fur Europe
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Croatia
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Lithuania
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 493652216941-84 Eesti Advokatuur (Eston
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Som Energia sccl
The representative of an organisation registered 886047218985-67 ACUDE - Asociacion de
The representative of an organisation registered 171767211533-02 Fdration europenne d
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Other country
An individual in my pers Hungary
An individual in my pers Malta
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 013953215837-21 Bernd Schnittler Consul
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Other country
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 18823402664-60 bulgarian society for rail
The representative of an organisation registered 43691777818-34 Federation of European
The representative of an organisation registered 460594519070-95 Adaptant Solutions AG
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 826843613782-52 Beruf5213132544
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 923186120002-37 CAMERA DE COMERT SI
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 6113045396-06 Fdration nationale de
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 9435658947-27 Direct Selling Europe (
The representative of an organisation registered 52277883476-14 ANITA
An individual in my pers Greece
The representative of an organisation registered 08614897787-35 ASOCIACIN DIANOVA
The representative of an organisation registered 331200913549-94 INTERBOR
The representative of an organisation registered 916169012106-53 iptsat
An individual in my pers Greece
The representative of an organisation registered 13097896529-66 Fortzer
The representative of an organisation registered 98782194744-29 Harmoni
The representative of an organisation registered 881983612196-94 Association Europenn
The representative of an organisation registered 834691420437-87 Unifly
The representative of an organisation registered Inter2514713140 IAAP
The representative of an organisation registered 250843310363-42 Asociacin de Tcnicos S
The representative of an organisation registered 2837382374-72 Coimbra Group
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 264048311507-68 Ocean Energy Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 329754520360-51 Davenport McKesson Cor
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 294072819611-29 Stratgies Mer et Littora
The representative of an organisation registered 129549620339-03 UNPACT
The representative of an organisation registered 171425020168-34 Asociacin Europea de I
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 071056710698-89 AVEVY
The representative of an organisation registered 90243962161.04 CAPA-Cooperativa dos A
The representative of an organisation registered 54373984497-13 Cabinet Tauthui & Assoc
The representative of an organisation registered 22551429377-07 VAT Practitioners Group
The representative of an organisation registered 43906893904-1 eurolobby
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Romanian Asociation fro
The representative of an organisation registered 794286420808-77 European Economic Cha
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Hungary
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 12749675101-70 ECIROA = European Capt
The representative of an organisation registered 025475014255-64 AICO EDV-Beratung G
The representative of an organisation registered 49149349131-64 MIQUEL ANGEL VALLES
The representative of an organisation registered 807981018372-79 Alliance for Democracy
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 29970752834-36 Bundesverband Baustoffe
The representative of an organisation registered 013394611927-62 the International Center
The representative of an organisation registered 954282520923-24 Juan Jose Mulero Orteg
The representative of an organisation registered 638820912393-43 European Elite Athletes
The representative of an organisation registered 657585813025-52 NURSING UP IL SINDA
The representative of an organisation registered 697065015056-39 Promote Ukraine
The representative of an organisation registered 636752920377 TB Alliance
The representative of an organisation registered 502042412304-13 CONUSBAT Regulatory
The representative of an organisation registered 48720121070-58 Coord451599218
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 611206918763-57 H-Comp Consultiung
The representative of an organisation registered 25034761081714 dipartimento europeo si
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 249230517253-41 Mas Avenir
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 1412BRU00313 FREDERIC MAURO SP
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered Ass8614650577 Associazione Europea Fe
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 698412320216-92 Financiar Acces SRL
The representative of an organisation registered 116915712797-73 Asociatia pentru Promo
The representative of an organisation registered 597848518285-91 EbiGU Engagierte Brge
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 5903604107-54 Taxpayers Association o
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 963162918784-50 UNIN GENERAL DE
The representative of an organisation registered 850749020806-53 GAL Eloro
An individual in my pers Cyprus
The representative of an organisation registered Asoci259382753 Asociatia Heidenroslein
The representative of an organisation registered 94837329683-94 International Associatio
The representative of an organisation registered 16549972091-86 AGE Platform Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 50318109352-58 CEREPPOL
The representative of an organisation registered 602795316790-45 Kooperation deutscher Ti
The representative of an organisation registered 505188620414 Asociatia Romana pent
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation registered 077706416598-79 COTANCE
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered Eolos1614701280 E-olo srl
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 468545220718-02 S3PCIMEX
An individual in my pers Greece
The representative of an organisation registered 731027919621 04 Giuseppe Lettini
The representative of an organisation registered 75895344258-05 Pohjois-Pohjanmaan lintu
An individual in my pers Czech Republic
The representative of an organisation registered 237806117704-74 EPPOSI
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 673491614416-62 ITALPOLLINA S.p.A.
The representative of an organisation registered 1404621848-82 Safeguard for Agricultura
The representative of an organisation registered 757674714316-65 Dngekalk-Hauptgemein
The representative of an organisation registered 87365826901-63 Tecnalia
The representative of an organisation registered Deuts0114329849 DPRG
The representative of an organisation registered 631025116128-79 European Medical Stude
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency ethic srls
The representative of an organisation registered 551463820607-31 European Osteopaths
The representative of an organisation registered 79639147194-11 Alkedo
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency O3 Makes free - O3 Mach
The representative of an organisation registered 58165854227-94 European league for the
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 024432110419-97 Liechtenstein Bankers A
The representative of an organisation registered 712956418144 Ecolog
The representative of an organisation registered 75964025885-59 European Mobile Seed A
The representative of an organisation registered 873181915791-38 Danske Medier
The representative of an organisation registered 8203543301-90 EWIMA (European Writing
The representative of an organisation registered 582768716033-06 ageas SA/NV
The representative of an organisation registered 62975755109-62 Mutuelle d'Assurance de
The representative of an organisation registered 434875112121-60 Fire Safety Platform
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 46864329475-46 Rechtsanwalt Anton Sch
The representative of an organisation registered 50874201390-43 Chemical Business Assoc
The representative of an organisation registered 244874814189-27 Vetcel Ltd
The representative of an organisation registered 860456882255-44 ASSOCIATION OF ACC
The representative of an organisation registered 57596413786-53 Europische Metall Uni
The representative of an organisation registered 15086733813-03 Confdration europenne
The representative of an organisation registered 573131319990-45 Universitatea Babe-Bol
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Vereniging van Leveran
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 153027416761-07 Centro Nazionale Sporti
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered Flori8814408586 Floricode
The representative of an organisation registered 93326299329-13 GE.SE.FI. onlus
The representative of an organisation registered 888-89756-78 OMNICONSUL-Public Aff
The representative of an organisation registered 256252314853-30 European Council for St
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered Gesel104428383 Gesellschaft zur Rettung
The representative of an organisation registered 739094715664-45 Association Europenne
The representative of an organisation registered 50878746386-39 Deutscher Brauer-Bund
The representative of an organisation registered 555632318779-09 Badai
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Samband slenskra sveita
The representative of an organisation registered 759449112185-60 bc berger Communicati
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 09688752938-96 Mouvement europen-Fran
The representative of an organisation registered 0893446630-97 Danish District Heating
An individual in my pers Romania
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Pirate Lobby
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered Proto0714350916 protocol international
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation registered 07483302972-25 Diakonie Deutschland E
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 128369815165-36 ASOCIACION AFECTAD
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency public matters
The representative of an organisation registered 64226865049-04 Europische Akademie
The representative of an organisation registered 846740410675-03 Europe Culture et Citoy
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 03451096957-77 European Salt Producers
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 872332582-69 BERNARDI EUGENIO
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Cyprus
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 3265773534-15 AREPO
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency vis helvetica
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Luxembourg
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 625976815556-92 Agriculture and Horticu
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Region Hannover
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Sweden
The representative of an organisation registered Consi8114789389 Considera
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 488324411347-10 British Marine
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Slovak Republic
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 48849298417-82 Zimmer Biomet Holdings
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Portugal
The representative of an organisation registered 31662245786-54 REA RADIOTELEVISIO
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency DKT Consulting Ltd
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
The representative of an organisation registered 255886420598-33 National Association of
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 11458103335-07 EGEC
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Greece
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Validee
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Other country
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Latvia
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Denmark
The representative of an organisation registered 24516996887-24 European Region of the
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Luxembourg
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Romania
An individual in my pers Romania
An individual in my pers Romania
An individual in my pers Finland
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Lithuania
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 0584121345-92 Ausstellungs- und Messe
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Romania
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Latvia
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 260615613726-15 Colegio Profesional de
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 465 308 314 12-96 Brot fr die Welt
An individual in my pers Austria
The representative of an organisation registered 58204758673-16 MasterCard Europe
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 785683118324-55 CONSELL GENERAL DE
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 74989093163-18 European Boating Indus
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Romania
The representative of an organisation registered 034546859-02 Independent Retail Eur
The representative of an organisation registered 20705158207-35 Danish Bankers Associa
The representative of an organisation registered 5378003762-62 Toyota Motor Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 94607479886-02 AMUNDI
The representative of an organisation registered 84973761187-60 EuroCommerce A.I.S.B.
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation registered Cmar502566136 Cmara Oficial de Comer
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Other country
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Celle
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 255298920864-73 Willem Scholten consult
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 14575766603-44 European Organisation o
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Poland
The representative of an organisation registered 35279857524-58 European Movement Inte
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 48703695391-16 CRUAAS & ASOCIAD
The representative of an organisation registered 84768556104-35 Foreign Trade Associati
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 46742654343-05 Golf Europe
An individual in my pers Croatia
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Other country
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered Iheeu2414651675 IHE-Europe
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Sweden
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 32814201372-84 European Aerosol Feder
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Other country
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Unna
The representative of an organisation registered 4016736872-59 General Electric Compa
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Czech Republic
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Denmark
An individual in my pers Denmark
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency StdteRegion Aachen
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Ireland
The representative of an organisation registered 22169245489-60 Fdration Europenne d
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 5159980776-55 Eucolait - European Asso
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered PT5462241 GIRP - European Healthc
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Landshut
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Siegen-Wittgenste
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 04077716126-17 European Industrial Gas
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Poland
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Niederschsischer Landk
The representative of an organisation registered 444896420983-33 ALEXIS
The representative of an organisation registered 0757172464-29 GIRP - European Healthc
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 68270708350-60 International Associatio
The representative of an organisation registered 74255575543-90 ENVIRONMENTAL SERV
The representative of an organisation registered 596915820961-12 Young European Leader
The representative of an organisation registered 262072219982-51 B2EU Consulting
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Other country
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Groe Kreisstadt Hoyer
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Innsbruck
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Delmenhorst
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered Compa197989263 Compassion in World F
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 403181718710-11 SPP - distribcia, a.s.
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 607887719353-18 Dianova International
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 332026115325-38 FA - Finanssektorens Ar
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Viersen
The representative of an organisation registered 644841621368-72 Kowat Control Biomimt
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Rhein-Kreis Neuss - Der
The representative of an organisation registered FR-2008-BTQ-220752113 AITEC
An individual in my pers Cyprus
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Braunschweig
The representative of an organisation registered 42119616334-41 Food & Water Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 672204711627-29 EQAR
The representative of an organisation registered 150920420956-26 Association of Clinical
An individual in my pers Croatia
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Greece
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Krefeld
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Krefeld
The representative of an organisation registered 5891420216285 ANACOFI
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 782765412493-49 Associacion for Natural
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 25679671885-26 Federacin Digital EA
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Poland
The representative of an organisation registered 02452103934-97 ADAC e.V.
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Hildesheim
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Ireland
The representative of an organisation registered 635279821512-37 Law Firm Farcas-Nedelc
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 5189667783-94 Zentralverband des Deu
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 198687221531-48 Kinnegad Combined Co
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Gtersloh
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Der Regierende Brgerme
The representative of an organisation registered 2694372574-63 Alliance for Lobbying T
An individual in my pers Finland
The representative of an organisation registered Briti3514235153 British Specialist Nutriti
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Ireland
The representative of an organisation registered 94817271686270 Handwerkskammer Ulm
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Brogemeinschaft der E
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
The representative of an organisation registered 60975211600-74 Invest Europe
An individual in my pers Slovenia
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 338352318442-47 Hrvatska zajednica upa
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Polskie Towarzystwo Fil
The representative of an organisation registered 338352318442-47 Croatian County Associa
An individual in my pers Finland
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Offenbach
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency kunfud
An individual in my pers Finland
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Slovenia
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 62636428022-47 Provincie Noord Brabant
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Warendorf
The representative of an organisation registered 42433582-82 FORATOM
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Kleve - Der Landr
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Bezirk Schwaben
An individual in my pers Other country
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Slovak Republic
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Latvia
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 8491787572473 Bundesverband Deutsch
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Finland
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 3505006282-58 ABBL
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 6182372280-83 ALFI
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Ireland
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Czech Republic
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Lithuania
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 70041276286-89 Laroche Conseil
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Zavod Intitut za elektron
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Germany Brogemeinschaft der Europabros der bayerischen
An individual in my pers United Kingdom schsischen Kommunen (getragen durch die kommu
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Spitzenverbnde Bayerns, Baden-Wrttembergs und
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Altreonic NV
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Austria
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Mnchen, Mar
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Bulgaria
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Netherlands Brogemeinschaft der Europabros der bayerischen
An individual in my pers Germany schsischen Kommunen (getragen durch die kommu
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Spitzenverbnde Bayerns, Baden-Wrttembergs und
The representative of an organisation registered 777023714204-72 Baden-Wrttembergische
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Wesel
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 501222919-71 Transparency Internatio
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 888 89756-78 Omniconsul-Public Affai
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Landshut
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Greece
The representative of an organisation registered Munuc139524563 municipality of iraklio at
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Greece
An individual in my pers Estonia
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Tiroler Gemeindeverban
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Stendal
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Department of Public E
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered Inter467774150 IFRA (International Frag
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Behrde
The representative of an organisation registered 12377856409-55 Union Nationale des Co
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 040632614929-26 Danske Havne
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Fietsersbond VZW
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Gemeinde Stanz bei La
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Marktgemeinde Kundl
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 19714485883-27 Lumina sprl
The representative of an organisation registered 23869471911-54 Bundesarbeitskammer s
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Gemeinde Volders
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Bayerische Staatsregier
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 953933297-85 AFEP (Association fran
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadtgemeinde Neuleng
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Heilbronn
The representative of an organisation registered 049793414915-58 Sicim Spa
The representative of an organisation registered 33561661927-40 Nanotechnology Industri
The representative of an organisation registered 074338911841-91 Rete nazionale operatori
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered NBQ TECHNOLOGY DIGITAL GROUP
The representative of an organisation registered 452046515134-42 Vigilis Politica
The representative of an organisation registered 820341581223-36 FUNDACIN CENTRO
The representative of an organisation registered 521341216901-93 EUROPORTE
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency ESTER Association
The representative of an organisation registered 190491021763-93 European Biomass Indus
The representative of an organisation registered Stich4714180391 Stichting EAPN Nederla
The representative of an organisation registered Flori8814408586 H.P. Zwinkels
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landratsamt Neu-Ulm
The representative of an organisation registered 806128721481-01 International Alliance of
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 171767211533-02 FEPS
The representative of an organisation registered 609300716175-67 CooperFin S.p.A.
The representative of an organisation registered 59893117192-26 International Public Rel
The representative of an organisation registered 43369406961-89 AKB
The representative of an organisation registered 911224720315-28 ICT Consultative Counci
The representative of an organisation registered 048261321501-53 Asociacion Oceanos de
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 95990808181-93 Hachiko vzw
The representative of an organisation registered 277619815968-37 RING Advocacy ApS
The representative of an organisation registered 153973318978-42 Bureau of International
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency WBO
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Association pour le D
The representative of an organisation registered 8247510907380 cabinet syldy consulting
The representative of an organisation registered 4263301811-33 Pfizer
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 86984114195-68 Federacin de ridos
The representative of an organisation registered 716747713857-35 BXL Europe asbl
The representative of an organisation registered 986218614620-17 Associazione per lo Svil
The representative of an organisation registered 080551814378-33
602423612814-80 Must & Partners
The representative of an organisation registered 191306718204-57 ZERYA Producciones sin
The representative of an organisation registered Fondazione Adkins Chiti
The representative of an organisation registered 582485310717-46 ETP-ZEP
The representative of an organisation registered 92876453439-40 European Large Familie
The representative of an organisation registered ROMAN378552291 ASOCIATIA AEROPORT
The representative of an organisation registered 95072484406-67 Stowarzyszenie zwyke
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 42967152383-63 EDA
The representative of an organisation registered 937012821700-96 Cx4
The representative of an organisation registered 88072891086-36 ECTAA - Group of Nation
The representative of an organisation registered 21280626733-05 Deutsches Zentrum fr
The representative of an organisation registered 59342921440-89 IARU-R1 Political Relat
An individual in my pers Other country
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Zwizek Rzemiosa Pols
The representative of an organisation registered 794286420808-77 European Economic Ch
The representative of an organisation registered 926528111241-47 PROGECOOP
The representative of an organisation registered Garbi0214791744 Garbionda
The representative of an organisation registered 643532821002-69 2m4
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 573365521161#78 Representative Office o
The representative of an organisation registered 711197015348-03 Irish Cattle & Sheep Far
The representative of an organisation registered 324317212105-48 Nucleo Guardia Ambient
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 98016578626-11 EGALE, Egalit-Lacit
The representative of an organisation registered 81494518538-75 Associazione Culturale
The representative of an organisation registered 248993414712-40 ENA - European Nursery
The representative of an organisation registered 327963813920-28 associazione internazio
An individual in my pers Denmark
The representative of an organisation registered 04742008958-57 danzaria
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 566077714587-83 Sogrape Vinhos SA
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 832642915261-54 Movimento Italiano in E
The representative of an organisation registered Inter906594107 International Services A
The representative of an organisation registered 047479520364-58 Associazione Europea Fe
The representative of an organisation registered 28175274067-75 EFFAB
The representative of an organisation registered 563400416574-89 Sveriges Bussresearran
The representative of an organisation registered 697065015056-39 Promote Ukraine
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered Slove7614514769 SAPIE
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered Europ528884314 European Heritage Lega
The representative of an organisation registered 265962718565-49 Dataskydd.net Sverige
The representative of an organisation registered 262987221791-87 ASINVER
The representative of an organisation registered 217065513622-24 KARL KRONER KG
The representative of an organisation registered 052007712004-80 European Parents Assoc
An individual in my pers Spain
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation registered 30399232694-16 Ezstkanl Nyugdjas T
The representative of an organisation registered 472682242281-35 A.C.E. Consulting dba A
The representative of an organisation registered Peerc1214575154 Peercraft ApS
The representative of an organisation registered 049215512245-42 ACADEMY OF ENTREP
The representative of an organisation registered 59088181732-83 Sinop University Faculty
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 190071212051 Technetium Consulting
The representative of an organisation registered 687817721601-69 Bonnier Broadcasting
The representative of an organisation registered 798071410461-65 PRS for Music
The representative of an organisation registered 31462594848-53 Business Support Centr
The representative of an organisation registered Europ87310147 CETS
The representative of an organisation registered 230235714034-13 European Network on In
The representative of an organisation registered 340058514708-71 Frimstone Ltd
The representative of an organisation registered 70183498905-52 European Specialist Nur
The representative of an organisation registered Nordp5114618860 Nord Pool Spot
The representative of an organisation registered Liber696394138 Universit Popolare LU
The representative of an organisation registered 58165854227-94 European league for the
The representative of an organisation registered Europ7013568627 European Network on Rel
The representative of an organisation registered 990257116188-47 East of England Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 359307713029-55 activ fr alle - Integrati
The representative of an organisation registered 94837329683-94 International Assn for F
The representative of an organisation registered 78661496356-69 ATHENEUM LIBERAL S
The representative of an organisation registered 071056710698-89 Assoc0810372703
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered Fachv676172192 Austrian Association for
The representative of an organisation registered 39068194588-61 Fdration International
The representative of an organisation registered 4422649896-52 UECBV
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Zesp Aktywnoci Spo
The representative of an organisation registered 80248698067-50 German Hospital Federa
The representative of an organisation registered 571426515552-29 Allied Spectrum Associa
The representative of an organisation registered 156799113994-03 European Federation of
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 58744833263-19 Transport and Environme
The representative of an organisation registered Oromo4114628017 Oromo parliamentarians
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Wildschnau
The representative of an organisation registered 1404621848-82 SAVE-Foundation
The representative of an organisation registered 068890821527-53 CARMEN e.V.
The representative of an organisation registered 077706416598-79 COTANCE
The representative of an organisation registered 178831615858-62 anav
The representative of an organisation registered 053117613298-41 FEDIAF
The representative of an organisation registered 435130314953-28 A2 Policy Advice
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 24082737690-57 Towers Watson Limited
The representative of an organisation registered 001866415031-87 HSBC Holdings Plc
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 545283317403-97 FEDERAIA NAIONAL
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered 67816104631-57 Handwerkskammer Frank
The representative of an organisation registered 28280717783-17 World Nuclear Council
The representative of an organisation registered 158241921709-39 Restarting the Future
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency TERUMO BCT
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 5353162366-85 Corporate Europe Obser
The representative of an organisation registered 428630719734-25 SMES-Europa
The representative of an organisation registered 204833515454-79 OPPORTUNITY ASBL
The representative of an organisation registered 675251413366-32 Danske Studerendes Fl
The representative of an organisation registered Confe7514226596 CONFEDERAO DO C
The representative of an organisation registered 608174919777-30 Beaulieu International
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 07055806769-32 BIBM
An individual in my pers Germany
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Aichach-Fried
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Freising
The representative of an organisation registered 14766442240-14 Deutscher Verein fr ff
The representative of an organisation registered 412752013756-49 NEON
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landkreis Berchtesgade
An individual in my pers Ireland
The representative of an organisation registered 3978240953-79 BUSINESSEUROPE
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 66336536137-63 World Federation of Tour
The representative of an organisation registered 62036915250-25 Asociacin de Empresas
The representative of an organisation registered 47195853551-35 Asociacin Nacional de
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation registered 1771817758-48 Bundesverband der Deuts
The representative of an organisation registered 17839103549-54 Asociacin Nacional de
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 69321482460-90 Asociacin Nacional de
The representative of an organisation registered 39968323574-10 Asociacin de Armadore
The representative of an organisation registered 30045843550-37 Asociacin Nacional de
The representative of an organisation registered 15913213485-46 Pesticide Action Networ
The representative of an organisation registered 34954249295-81 VIK e.V. - Verband der In
An individual in my pers Romania
The representative of an organisation registered 69851845452-33 CFE-CGC ENERGIES
The representative of an organisation registered 93987316076-63 CEMBUREAU - The Euro
The representative of an organisation registered 928780213492-36 Interstedelijk Studenten
The representative of an organisation registered Feder5414402986 European Federation fo
The representative of an organisation registered 20210641335-88 Orgalime
The representative of an organisation registered 470080317320-90 Koreneef Public Affairs
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation registered 50751211239-57 European Federation of
An individual in my pers Poland
An individual in my pers Poland
The representative of an organisation registered Europ784410164 European Wax Federati
The representative of an organisation registered 009214311424-03 SEA Europe
An individual in my pers Poland
The representative of an organisation registered 0893446630-97 Danish District Heating
The representative of an organisation registered 0285583802-96 Naturschutzbund Deutsc
The representative of an organisation registered 15366395387-57 Nestl S.A.
The representative of an organisation registered 38091528151-27 European Respiratory S
The representative of an organisation registered 85235158413-79 Groupement des Cartes
The representative of an organisation registered 839751414764-22 European Card Payment
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Naturschutzbund Deuts
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Bundesstadt Bonn
The representative of an organisation registered 677743413396 EUROPEAN FEDERATIO
An individual in my pers Poland
The representative of an organisation registered 393445716716-91 AIRPORT OPERATORS
The representative of an organisation registered Branc6211380450 Branchevereniging VHG
The representative of an organisation registered 646022113355-88 Fdration des Industrie
The representative of an organisation registered 096124310820-70 Alma Mater Studiorum -
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Asociacin de Profesiona
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Delegation of Auvergne
The representative of an organisation registered 77105321408-83 FEFAC
The representative of an organisation registered 84839535366-67 Fdration International
The representative of an organisation registered 48544465107-88 Deutsche Post DHL Gro
The representative of an organisation registered 18941013532-08 European Public Health
The representative of an organisation registered 7574621118-27 Community of European
The representative of an organisation registered 69745087426-20 Fujitsu General Euro G
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Marktgemeinde Wllersd
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Marktgemeinde Grafenw
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Pforzheim
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Gemeinde Ottenthal
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency sterreichischer Stdte
The representative of an organisation registered 10405322962-08 Wirtschaftskammer ste
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kreis Steinfurt
The representative of an organisation registered 0346440357-87 European Association of
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency EP intergroup on Integr
The representative of an organisation registered 06698681039-26 European Trade Union O
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadtgemeinde Litschau
The representative of an organisation registered 12493392840-79 EUROCITIES
The representative of an organisation registered 43763731235-75 Mouvement des entrepri
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Marktgemeinde Rabenst
The representative of an organisation registered 29840188581-12 SODEXO SA
The representative of an organisation registered 13795213569-71 Jeantet AARPI
The representative of an organisation registered 694466214317-80 Association Belge des C
The representative of an organisation registered 942748221075-81 GEM motors, innovative e
The representative of an organisation registered 457312321659-55 Grupo Ttico de Fora A
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Rural Education and Ag
The representative of an organisation registered 61973396926-78 EKD-Bro Brssel / EKD-
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 2349218828-41 Daimler AG
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation registered 622451920058-29 VNCI
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 152131714573-59 Diplomat Consult S.R.L.
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation registered 15066281874-49 Intellectual Property La
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 6439238521-03 ASEDIE, Asociacin Multi
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 53141413510-95 Grayling
The representative of an organisation registered 47350036909-69 Secretariat of COMECE
The representative of an organisation registered 6128433730-45. FEDECRAIL - European F
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 849925514506-35 Li Service
The representative of an organisation registered Initi6910072472 Initiative for the Develo
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Kommune
The representative of an organisation registered 9737622425-76 Bundesarbeitsgemeinsch
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadtverwaltung Leipzig
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency N Gemeindebund
The representative of an organisation registered 7410939793-88 BASF SE
The representative of an organisation registered 11011208847-86 Glass and Glazing Feder
The representative of an organisation registered Regro718472728 REFORMED ou R.E.FO.R
The representative of an organisation registered 431222818523-35 Bund Getrnkeverpacku
The representative of an organisation registered 5749958415-41 Confederation of Danish
The representative of an organisation registered 60399267990-31 International Federation
The representative of an organisation registered 4447605981-76 Statoil ASA
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 43783176689-06 KL (Kommunernes Lands
The representative of an organisation registered 6437280268-55 Gesamtverband der Deut
The representative of an organisation registered 501222919-71 Transparency Internatio
The representative of an organisation registered 62460931291-40 Imperial Tobacco Group
The representative of an organisation registered 4760969620-65 Council of Bars and Law
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Convention of Scottish
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Public Relations
Transparency Consul
International Lithuanian
The representative of an organisation registered 501222919-71 Chapter
An individual in my pers Netherlands
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 46856801604-90 OXFAM INTERNATIONA
The representative of an organisation registered 47676761061-93 VERBOND VAN BELGIS
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Campaign Against Arms
The representative of an organisation registered 9825553393-31 Friends of the Earth Eu
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
An individual in my pers Portugal
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 501222919-71 Transparency Internatio
The representative of an organisation registered 6637576125105 Grande Loge Fminine d
An individual in my pers Belgium
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Verein zur Frderung de
The representative of an organisation registered 644245448-07 UNIONE CAMERE ESPE
The representative of an organisation registered 39966101835-69 ELECTRICITE DE FRAN
The representative of an organisation registered 1496873833-97 Confederation of Europ
An individual in my pers Poland
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Sveriges Kommuner och L
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Komisija za prepreevan
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 38020227042-38 and 8 Law Society of England
The representative of an organisation registered 55481528937-66 Konferenz Europischer
The representative of an organisation registered 99127823248-77 Stefan Scheuer SPRL
The representative of an organisation registered 85717948337-22 Verband der Kali- und Sa
The representative of an organisation registered 20457441380-38 BDEW Bundesverband der
The representative of an organisation registered 121740613680-43 Portes Ouvertes
The representative of an organisation registered 78982871558-95 Deutscher Zigarettenver
The representative of an organisation registered 81142561702-61 Council of European Mu
The representative of an organisation registered 7824139202-85 EUROPEAN APPAREL A
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 9264296748-42 Society of European Aff
An individual in my pers Germany
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Coalition of Association
The representative of an organisation registered 48849298417-82 Zimmer Biomet Holding
The representative of an organisation registered 9505781573-45 Bureau Europen des U
The representative of an organisation registered 501222919-71 Transparency Internatio
The representative of an organisation registered 39299129772-62 EurEau
An individual in my pers Other country
The representative of an organisation registered 198063521842-62 European Network Again
The representative of an organisation registered 13635802880-80 Henkel AG & CO KGaA
The representative of an organisation registered 790716210509-69 EU-Logos Athena
The representative of an organisation registered 8828523562-52 European Public Affairs
The representative of an organisation registered 0714344663-32 Lufthansa Group
The representative of an organisation registered 1274604847-34 Confederation of Finnish
The representative of an organisation registered 95574664768-90 Verband der Automobilind
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Association Franaise d
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 0138855852-93 European Smoking Tobac
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Marktgemeinde Grokru
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Landeshauptstadt Stuttg
The representative of an organisation registered 99578067285-35 Eni
The representative of an organisation registered 76130992074-15 Gas Infrastructure Euro
The representative of an organisation registered 11063928073-34 Amnesty International Eu
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 22400601191-42 Deutscher Industrie- u
The representative of an organisation registered 635043818530-97 Croatian Banking Associ
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Netherlands
The representative of an organisation registered 291870610961-51 Drutvo Ekologi brez me
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 1083162721-43 Stichting BirdLife Europ
The representative of an organisation registered 501222919-71 Transparency Internatio
The representative of an organisation registered 1849405799-88 Total S.A.
The representative of an organisation registered 686996021811-49 Associao Portuguesa
The representative of an organisation registered 191538712765-84 Wikimedia (Free Knowl
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Belgium
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Austria
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Slovenia
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 6504541970-40 Volkswagen Aktiengesell
The representative of an organisation registered 905001612275-82 Enags S.A.
An individual in my pers France
An individual in my pers Italy
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 82936193787-44 Union des Entreprises
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Marktgemeinde St. Mart
The representative of an organisation registered 501222919-71 Transparency Internati
The representative of an organisation registered 27567784437-46 Tobaksindustrien
The representative of an organisation registered 34369111614-57 Socit Gnrale
The representative of an organisation registered 43785827982-59 UNI Europa
The representative of an organisation registered 7749519702-29 Bundesvereinigung der
The representative of an organisation registered 846795818801-87 Forum Umwelt und Entw
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 41816938101-07 IBERDROLA.SA
The representative of an organisation registered 24633926420-79 Better Finance, the Eur
The representative of an organisation registered 17804464809-28 Euronext
The representative of an organisation registered 968177917885-14 Employers' Confederatio
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Association de la Ville
The representative of an organisation registered 38526121292-88 European Federation of
The representative of an organisation registered 01546986656-22 European Alcohol Policy
An individual in my pers Spain
The representative of an organisation registered 92399882921-71
814721210555-72 EURALIA
UNIN ESPAOLA DE ENTIDADES ASEGURADO
The representative of an organisation registered
The representative of an organisation registered 022255314501-32 CIP - Confederao Empr
The representative of an organisation registered 5265780509-97 The American Chamber
The representative of an organisation registered 3373670692-24 European Fund and Ass
The representative of an organisation registered 68057486299-01 European Emergency Nu
The representative of an organisation registered 0649790813-47 ACEA
The representative of an organisation registered 68700057230-72 BIONTINO EUROPE
The representative of an organisation registered 75729476306-17 Wintershall Holding Gm
The representative of an organisation registered 94275086214-14
586970115022-56 FNTR
The representative of an organisation registered First Five Consulting
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Consiglio regionale del
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Bezirksverband Niederb
The representative of an organisation registered 71175716023-03 JT International S.A.
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Bamberg
The representative of an organisation registered 25412265365-88 Bundesrechtsanwaltsk
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency South Bohemian Region
The representative of an organisation registered 798404313938-50 UFIP
An individual in my pers Ireland
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency South Bohemian Region
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency BASE
The representative of an organisation registered 090350412968-04 Banco Bilbao Vizcaya A
The representative of an organisation registered 266727516639-73 50Hertz Transmission
The representative of an organisation registered 042383714852-64 Transdev Group
The representative of an organisation registered 64879142323-90 European Chemical Indus
The representative of an organisation registered 29642463540-93 sterreichischer Recht
The representative of an organisation registered 759842510633-18 FAU Bernard FVF AVO
The representative of an organisation registered 57238506728-24 Unin Profesional
The representative of an organisation registered 150480218577-06 Institute of Alcohol Stud
The representative of an organisation registered 27762251795-15 Confindustria - Confeder
The representative of an organisation registered 1414929419-24 WWF European Policy
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Palvelualojen ammattilii
The representative of an organisation registered 783456217223-84 CALIF
The representative of an organisation registered 783456217223-84 CALIF
The representative of an organisation registered 57238506728-24 Unin Profesional
- Croatian Association of Tenants EU Citizens
- Institute for Culture and Ethics
- Association for Self Advocacy
- Faculty of Political Science Student's Club
- Code for Croatia
- Documenta
The representative of an organisation registered 27799842497-69 -SUEZ
CenterGroup
for Citizens Initiative Porec
The representative of an organisation registered ID1699998503207 Cooperatives Europe
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency - Brod Ecological Society - BED
The representative of an organisation registered 89093924456-06 Vereinigung der sterrei
The representative of an organisation registered 15423437054-40 Verband der Chemischen
The representative of an organisation registered 226354616978-90 Vanguard Asset Manage
The representative of an organisation registered 52240973601-34 Geelmuyden Kiese
The representative of an organisation registered 416456120129-02 BSH Hausgerte GmbH
The representative of an organisation registered 49931835063-67 Access Info Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 0711626572-26 ECPA
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 11487521943-46 EUNAAPA
The representative of an organisation registered 57221111091-19 Frank Bold
The representative of an organisation registered 353804021418-79 Gide
An individual in my pers Slovenia
The representative of an organisation registered 570846710712-13 European Beer Consume
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency European Movement Ire
An individual in my pers Slovenia
The representative of an organisation registered 35890511033-58 Irish Funds Industry Ass
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Vlaamse Regering
The representative of an organisation registered 030040413042-95 Michela Cocchi - Studio
The representative of an organisation registered 65110063986-76 Association for Financi
The representative of an organisation registered 1978775156-31 IFIEC Europe - Internat
The representative of an organisation registered 61911227368-75 European Patients' For
The representative of an organisation registered 33213703459-54 Insurance Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 771938270-34 ICAEW
The representative of an organisation registered 69240395197-02 REPSOL, S.A.
The representative of an organisation registered 204118419175-08 Red Flag
The representative of an organisation registered 52646912360-95 Die Deutsche Kreditwir
The representative of an organisation registered 39300567160-02 FEDMA
The representative of an organisation registered 39300567160-02 FEDMA
Union Ptrolire Europenne Indpendante's public ID number in the
The representative of an organisation registered Transparency Register is:UPEI
42843016904-50
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 01890906437-84 LA POSTE
The representative of an organisation registered 57231475311-15 Centre Maurits Coppiete
The representative of an organisation registered 44645832794-05 Universidad de Granada
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency APECOM Associao Por
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Stadt Karlsruhe
The representative of an organisation registered 96645517357-19 ClientEarth
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Scottish Local Governme
An individual in my pers United Kingdom
The representative of an organisation registered FFSA (5149794935-37) Association Franaise
The representative of an organisation registered 77823123416-69 European Parliamentary
The representative of an organisation registered 3945154610-54
44361352681-84 European Anti-Poverty
The representative of an organisation registered Stichting Health Action I
The representative of an organisation registered Borsa0713948094 Borsa Italiana SpA
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency CONSEIL NATIONAUX
The representative of an organisation registered 6256831207-27 Enel SpA
The representative of an organisation registered 105398420716-74 Handwerkskammer fr
The representative of an organisation registered 520775919740-63 Civil Society Europe
The representative of an organisation registered 37561907555-47 Bayerischer Handwerkst
The representative of an organisation registered 2889227277356 Handwerkskammer Niede
The representative of an organisation registered 3183894853-03 Hill & Knowlton Internat
The representative of an organisation registered 382147211686-77 Extended Producer Respo
An individual in my pers France
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Marktgemeinde Ziersdor
The representative of an organisation registered 13324391892-74 EnBW Energie Baden-W
An individual in my pers Italy
The representative of an organisation registered 16178359495-57 Vereinte Dienstleistung
The representative of an organisation registered 09245221105-30 Fdration bancaire fra
The representative of an organisation registered 39912257528-48 Confederation of Swedis
The representative of an organisation registered 58798766431-41 Deutsche Gesellschaft f
The representative of an organisation registered 43246044354-41 sterreichischer Gewer
The representative of an organisation registered 43251547769-22 European Youth Forum
The representative of an organisation registered 59513031434-92 CEEP - European Centre
The representative of an organisation registered 23020671103-67 Cambre Associates
The representative of an organisation registered 64270747023-20 DIGITALEUROPE
The representative of an organisation registered 03094871618-32 UniCredit
The representative of an organisation registered 85083981189-35 Social Platform
The representative of an organisation registered 705376917728-85 Initiative Wald mit Wild
The representative of an organisation registered 42122398878-52 CNA - Confederazione Na
The representative of an organisation registered 58969291154-50 Surfrider Foundation Eu
The representative of an organisation registered 016371114093-01 Toy Industries of Europe
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Oficina Antifrau de Cata
The representative of an organisation registered 16311905144-06 European Digital Rights
The representative of an organisation registered BNP P891636587 BNP Paribas
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Maecenata Stiftung
The representative of an organisation registered 47003483702-10 European Citizen Action
An individual in my pers Other country
The representative of an organisation registered 962426013632-68 Verband Insolvenzverwal
The representative of an organisation registered Conf154646105 Confdration des Synd
The representative of an organisation registered 94850879680-26 Finansforbundet
The representative of an organisation registered 5666358527775 ENSIE - European Networ
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency BLOOM (en fait on est in
The representative of an organisation registered 70953241037-94 SOMO - Stichting Onderz
The representative of an organisation registered 067560916517-43 Baby Milk Action
The representative of an organisation registered 6314918394-16 LobbyControl e.V.
The representative of an organisation registered 618675514930-33 Grand Orient de France
The representative of an organisation not registered in the Transparency Greens/EFA group in th
The organisation's head
*Your organisation bel Other profile a) Do you agree that e
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Luxembourg Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Estonia Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Partially agree
Spain Companies and groups non profit renewable en Fully agree
Spain Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Germany Professional consultancies Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Bulgaria Think tanks and research institutions No opinion
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Romania Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Disagree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Italy Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Czech Republic Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Disagree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Companies and groups Fully agree
Other country Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Professional consultancies Fully agree
Partially agree
France Professional consultancies Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
France Transnational associations and networks of publicFully agree
Portugal Transnational associations and networks of publicPartially agree
France Self-employed consultants Partially agree
United Kingdom Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Romania Non-governmental organisprofesional association Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Luxembourg Trade and business associations Fully agree
Austria Companies and groups Fully agree
Spain Law-firms Fully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Netherlands Think tanks and research institutions Fully agree
Spain Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Netherlands Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Italy Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Czech Republic Professional consultancies Partially agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Disagree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Law-firms Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Romania Professional consultancies Fully agree
Romania Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Disagree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Italy Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Fully agree
Romania Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Romania Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Italy Professional consultancies Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
France Companies and groups Partially agree
Fully agree
Italy Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Finland Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Italy Companies and groups Fully agree
Netherlands Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Spain Think tanks and research institutions Fully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Italy Professional consultanc innovazione sociale Fully agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Croatia Self-employed consultanNon-governmental organFully agree
Czech Republic Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Other country Trade and business associations Fully agree
Netherlands Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Companies and groups Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Austria Law-firms Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade and business associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Romania Academic institutions Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Netherlands Companies and groups Society of weighing comFully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Italy Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Netherlands Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Portugal Professional consultancies Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Academic institutions Partially agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Austria Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Other sub-national publicThere are only two level Fully agree
Austria Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
France Non-governmental organis
NGO Fully agree
Partially agree
Netherlands Professional consultancies Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Partially agree
Disagree
Netherlands Professional consultanc / Fully agree
Italy Think tanks and research institutions Partially agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Italy Self-employed consultants Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Italy Professional consultanc company in Eu project mFully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
United Kingdom Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicStadtregion Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Spain Professional consultancies Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
United Kingdom Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Italy Trade unions and professional associations Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Professional consultanc ? Fully agree
Partially agree
Other country Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Disagree
Fully agree
Netherlands Other organisations incluValidee.com Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Disagree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
No opinion
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Disagree
Fully agree
Disagree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Companies and groups Fully agree
Disagree
Spain Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Companies and groups Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Spain Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
No opinion
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicLandkreis als kommunalFully agree
Fully agree
Netherlands Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Spain Professional consultancies Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKreisverwaltung Fully agree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicandere Behrden auf suFully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicStadt Landshut Partially agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publickommunale GebietskrpeFully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national public- Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo
Partially agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Germany Other public or mixed entKommune im Freistaat Fully agree
Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicwww.innsbruck.gv.at Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Regional structures kommunale Gebietskrpe Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Slovak Republic Companies and groups Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Spain Other organisations including: event-organising en Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Denmark Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national public- Fully agree
Spain Companies and groups Fully agree
No opinion
Partially agree
Fully agree
No opinion
Disagree
Disagree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicffentlich-rechtliche Kr Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommune Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicStadt Krefeld Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicStadt Krefeld Fully agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
No opinion
No opinion
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale Verwaltung Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Romania Law-firms Fully agree
Partially agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Ireland Other organisations including: event-organising enPartially agree
Germany Other sub-national public- Fully agree
Partially agree
Germany Regional structures Der Regierende Brgerme Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade and business associations Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Germany Trade and business associations Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale Landes- bzwFully agree
Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Croatia Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Poland Non-governmental organis To jaki bd formularza,Disagree
Croatia Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicLandkreis Fully agree
Spain Professional consultanc www.ismaelarribas.wix. Partially agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Netherlands Regional structures Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKreisverwaltung Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publickommunale Gebietskrpe Fully agree
Germany Regional structures Die Bezirke gehren zur Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Luxembourg Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Luxembourg Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Disagree
Disagree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Slovenia Non-governmental organis Zasebni zavod - nevladnFully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Kommunale Landes- bzwFully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Companies and groups SME Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale GebietskrpFully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale Landes- bzwFully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicLandkreis Fully agree
Disagree
Cyprus Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwoFully agree
Partially agree
Portugal Professional consultancies Fully agree
Germany Regional structures Kommunale GebietskrpFully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Greece Regional structures Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Austria Other public or mixed entDer Tiroler GemeindeverFully agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publickeine Fully agree
Ireland Other public or mixed entIrish Government Depar Fully agree
Fully agree
Other country Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicGemeinde Faggen Fully agree
Romania Other sub-national public authorities Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organis NGO Fully agree
Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicGemeinden Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicMarktgemeinde Kundl Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Austria Trade unions and professional associations Disagree
Austria Other sub-national publicBrgermeister Fully agree
Germany Other public or mixed entRegion mit eigenen Ge Fully agree
Fully agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicDer N Gemeindebund istFully agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale Behrde / La Partially agree
Italy Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Spain Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Think tanks and research institutions Fully agree
Spain Other organisations including: event-organising enFully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organis not for profit associati Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Netherlands Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Netherlands Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicLandratsmter Fully agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Fully agree
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Companies and groups Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Partially agree
Romania Think tanks and research institutions Fully agree
Spain Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Other organisations including: event-organising enPartially agree
Denmark Professional consultancies Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Trade and business assoPersonenbefrderung Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organis Association pour le D Fully agree
France Professional consultancies Fully agree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Spain Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Spain Professional consultancies Fully agree
Italy Other organisations including: event-organising enFully agree
Belgium Transnational associations and networks of publicFully agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Romania Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Poland Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
France Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Think tanks and research institutions Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Poland Trade unions and profesorganizacja pracodawcFully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Professional consultancies Partially agree
Spain Companies and groups Fully agree
France Professional consultancies Fully agree
Fully agree
Other country Organisations representing churches and religio Fully agree
Ireland Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Other organisations including: event-organising en
Fully agree
Partially agree
France Think tanks and research institutions Partially agree
Italy Other organisations including: event-organising en
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Italy Academic institutions Partially agree
Fully agree
Portugal Companies and groups Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Italy Other organisations including: event-organising en
Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Sweden Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Slovak Republic Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Transnational associations and networks of publicFully agree
Sweden Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Professional consultancies Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Disagree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Hungary Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Denmark Companies and groups Fully agree
Greece Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Academic institutions Partially agree
Fully agree
Finland Professional consultancies Fully agree
Sweden Companies and groups Fully agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Bulgaria Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
United Kingdom Companies and groups Partially agree
Netherlands Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Italy Academic institutions Fully agree
Czech Republic Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Disagree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
United Kingdom Regional structures No opinion
Estonia Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Greece Academic institutions Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Partially agree
Austria Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Poland Non-governmental organis Lokalne stowarzyszenie F dully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Professional consultancies Fully agree
Sweden Other organisations including: event-organising enFully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Other organisations including: event-organising enNo opinion
Austria Other sub-national publicGemeinde/Kommune Fully agree
Germany Other organisations including: event-organising enFully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Professional consultancies Fully agree
United Kingdom Companies and groups Fully agree
Partially agree
Romania Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Regional structures Fully agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Italy Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Companies and groups MedTech industry Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Belgium Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Denmark Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Portugal Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale GebietskrpFully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale GebietskrpFully agree
Germany Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Belgium Other sub-national public authorities Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunalbehrde Fully agree
Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Austria Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Netherlands Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Netherlands Self-employed consultants Fully agree
Partially agree
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Disagree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organis Verband Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommune Fully agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade and business associations Fully agree
Netherlands Trade and business associations Fully agree
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Academic institutions Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and profesA Fully agree
Partially agree
France Regional structures Regional representation Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
France Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicKommune Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicAllfllige Landes(Verfas Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicDer
Oberbrgermeister
N Gemeindebund ist Fully
einagree
im Bundesland N verfassungsrechtlich veran
Austria Other sub-national publicAllfllige Landes(verfassungs)rechtliche
Fully agree Grundlagen.
Austria Other sub-national publicsterreichischer Stdte Fully agree
Austria Other public or mixed entities, created by law whoFully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicandere Behrden auf suFully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organis European Parliament In Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicAllfllige verfassungsre Fully agree
Belgium Transnational associations and networks of publicNo opinion
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Austria Other sub-national publicKommune Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
France Law-firms Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Slovenia Companies and groups Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organis Humanitarian Organizat Fully agree
Belgium Organisations representing churches and religio Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Netherlands Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Romania Professional consultancies Fully agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Spain Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Professional consultancies Fully agree
Belgium Organisations representing churches and religio Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Sweden Trade and business associations Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national public. Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Other public or mixed entKrperschaft des ffent Fully agree
Austria Other public or mixed entDer N Gemeindebund ist Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Fully agree
Other country Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Partially agree
Denmark Transnational associations and networks of publicFully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
United Kingdom Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Other sub-national publicNational association of LPartially agree
United Kingdom Trade unions and profesProfessional AssociationPartially agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organis I am not sure what this Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Think tanks and research institutions Partially agree
Fully agree
Austria Non-governmental organis NGO Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Sweden Other sub-national publicNationellt organ fr all Fully agree
Slovenia Other public or mixed entdravni organ Fully agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Organisations representing churches and religio Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Transnational associations and networks of publicFully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Partially agree
Partially agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Croatia Non-governmental organis Cratian umbrella patient Fully agree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Finland Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
France Trade unions and profesmonsieur Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicauf Grund bundesverfasFully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommune Fully agree
Italy Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Croatia Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Slovenia Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Portugal Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Disagree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Partially agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Spain Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Fully agree
Luxembourg Trade and business associations Fully agree
Austria Other sub-national publicGemeinde Partially agree
Romania Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Denmark Trade and business associations Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwoPartially agree
Fully agree
Spain Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwoFully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Latvia Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Transnational associatioDnomination en nerlanFully agree
Luxembourg Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwoFully agree
Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Portugal Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwoFully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Portugal Professional consultancies Fully agree
Italy Regional structures Assemblea legislativa Partially agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale Landes- bzwFully agree
Other country Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKommunale GebietskrperFully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Czech Republic Regional structures - No opinion
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Fully agree
Czech Republic Regional structures - No opinion
France Think tanks and researchGroupe de rflexion Fully agree
Spain Companies and groups Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Austria Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
France Law-firms Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwoFully agree
Italy Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwoFully agree
Finland Trade unions and profesYksityisten palvelualojenPartially agree
France Professional consultancies Fully agree
France Professional consultancies Fully agree
Spain Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Croatia Non-governmental organis NGOs Fully agree
Austria Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Companies and groups Fully agree
Other country Professional consultancies Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Spain Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Czech Republic Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Law-firms Fully agree
Fully agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Ireland Non-governmental organis Non-governmental organFully agree
Partially agree
Ireland Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Regional structures Regionale overheid Fully agree
Italy Law-firms Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
United Kingdom Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Spain Companies and groups Fully agree
Ireland Professional consultancies Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Belgium Think tanks and research institutions Fully agree
Spain Academic institutions Fully agree
Portugal Trade and business assoNA Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national publicKrperschaft des ffent Fully agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
United Kingdom Transnational associatioThe Scottish Local GovePartially agree
Partially agree
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Netherlands Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Italy Companies and groups Fully agree
France Trade and business assoInstitution reprsentativeFully agree
Italy Companies and groups Fully agree
Germany Regional structures Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Other sub-national public authorities Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Partially agree
Austria Other sub-national publicLandes(verfassungs)rec Fully agree
Germany Companies and groups Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
France Trade and business associations Fully agree
Sweden Trade and business associations Fully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Austria Trade unions and professional associations Disagree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Professional consultancies Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Italy Companies and groups Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
Italy Trade and business associations Fully agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Trade and business associations Fully agree
Spain Other public or mixed entPublic institution attac Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Companies and groups Fully agree
Germany Think tanks and researchThe Maecenata Foundatio Fully agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Fully agree
Germany Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Belgium Trade unions and professional associations Fully agree
Denmark Trade unions and professional associations Partially agree
Belgium Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
France Non-governmental organis Vos questions sont inco Partially agree
Netherlands Think tanks and research institutions Partially agree
United Kingdom Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Germany Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Partially agree
France Non-governmental organisations, platforms, netwo Fully agree
Belgium Other public or mixed entPolitical group in the E Fully agree
Comments or suggestions b) It (Optional)
is often said tha Comments or suggestions c) In (Optional)
your opinion, how
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac Sharing of similar value They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac contrler le passage du sThey are relatively tran
Los grupos de inters, Integrity;Equality of acc Los responsables de la tThey are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Only if there is a levell Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity openness and reliability They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are not transparent
Yes I fully agree in "lo Integrity;Equality of ac A system based on testim They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality
Lobbying is - in the first place - nothing more of access They are
than the representation of interest. Thenot transparent
right at all and organisations to r
for individuals
Auf jeden Fall: LobbyarbIntegrity;Equality of acc Transparenz (das heit They are relatively transparent
Therefore it would be worrying if the right to
Integrity;Equality of interact
access was reduced or limited in the
They arefuture, for instance
relatively by legislation targeting lo
transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Current observation of the debate on lobbying at EU Level shows that the more transparency the EU offers, the more it is push
Equality of access;Othe Lobbyisten mssen den T Ehey are not transparent at all
Harmful for adequate exchange between policy-makers and organised societal are
Equality of access They not transparent
interest are also otherat all
tendencies, sometimes
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
What may be the result one Integrity;Equality
day? Return to ofthe
access They are
1960s, where an often arrogant civilrelatively transparent
service (not only in Brussels, but also in m
Integrity "Equality of access": It They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac Pubblicit delle propost They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc Though equality of access They are relatively transparent
Very unhappy about howIntegrity;Equality
t of access They are not transparent at all
Please handle lobbying ca
Integrity;Equality of access
1. I think transparent lobbying will help build trust among the public who have Theylost
areconfidence
not transparent
in the European Union's indirect
LeHowever,
2. seul objectif
theest celu Integrity;Equality
transparency should not meanof accthat
Contrle citoyen ncessai
the negotiation-rooms They
becomeare a not transparent
Live political podium through which the a
Equality
3. The best way, I think, is to giveof access
the power to hold the government in-check Theytoare relatively
journalist transparentAnd let the public hold
organizations.
4. With Wikileaks we've seen
Integrity;Equality
what distrustofinaccess
the system can trigger. They are relatively transparent
Lobbying as such has a ne Other (please elaborate Policy-makers should beThey a are not transparent at all
Integrity Being open about Who isThey are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Lobbies of big businesseIntegrity;Equality of ac Representatives of civil They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Je suis pour plus de tra Integrity;Equality of ac Que la voix des citoyensThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
It must be a mandatory Integrity;Equality of acc Equality Max info of
andaccess hastobeen
equality Theyforwarded as atran
are relatively key criterion, but it is important to
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
For instance, in the EU's Common Fisheries Policy, an annex to 1380/2013 la
Konsultationen mit Lob Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Fully agree, as long as Integrity;Equality of ac Staff of the Institutions They regulations,
In establishing good lobbying are relativelywetran
must acknowledge that many n
LEs multinationales ne dIntegrity;Equality of ac la fainantise des dput They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac The above would not be Theyof such
area relatively
great concern,
tran if it were not for the EU's in
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Le lobbying ne peut resteIntegrity;Equality of acc L' quit dans le nombreThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of ac Mandatory registration They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Il n'y contribue pas ce Integrity;Equality of ac L'quit dans la pratiqu They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Lobbying will always be pIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
lobbying
I agree with the statement, however I have currently no hope that lobbyingThey
should be consiO ther (please elaborate the civil society should mayare
onenot
daytransparent
get "clean", i.e. transparent and ethica
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively
Does ethics mean that each time that a role-player in one field is received by the decisions maker, transparent
some representent of the o
Should lobbying still be allowed
Integrity;Equality
by the EUofinstitutions,
ac I would it is
say
a good
obligation
thing to
toNo
have
opinion
any intervention logged and accessible to any
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Other (please elaborate es muss vermieden werde They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Pas d'galit des armes Integrity;Other (please La premire commissionThey d are not transparent
Pas d'galit des armes Integrity;Other (please La premire commissionThey d are not transparent
Seul le peuple souverainIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Other (please elaborate No es lo mismo quien defThey are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Equality of access companies and NGOs mu They are relatively transparent
Other (please elaborate They are not transparent at all
Lobbyists are experts onIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Les intrts des citoyen Integrity Nous avons trop souventThey are relatively transparent
The question by itself i Integrity;Equality of ac Public institutions need They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Full transparency in any They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access;Othe I think that also reason They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Le politiche vanno discusOther (please elaborate Che ogni istanza presenta They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively tran
Your question is ambiguoIntegrity;Other (please Strong regulations contr They are not transparent at all
La FNMF est trs en faveu Integrity;Equality of acc Il est certain que nos a They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access Integrity is always importThey are relatively transparent
L'thique et la transpar Other (please elaborate L'argent qu'il est autori They are not transparent at all
A la ciudadana no nos l Integrity Como grupos de inters,They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Equality of access En fonction des thmatiqThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Lobbying is an essential Integrity;Equality of ac It is important that lobb They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access;Othe Que tenga otros reconocThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access;Othe the process must be open They are not transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
The EU Lobby transparen Integrity;Equality of ac Operating process to all They are highly transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively
Si les institutions de l'UE sont bien transparentes, il conviendrait qu'elles contraignent le lobbytransparent
arien l'tre tout autant.
Integrity;Equality of ac vocational motivation They are relatively transparent
Ce n'est pas le cas. Integrity;Equality of acc La rpression effective They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity Zuverlssigkeit They are highly transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are relatively transparent
O lbi tem de ser rigor Integrity;Equality of acc O acesso actividade d They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
pour le moment le lobby Equality of access;Othe LES LOBBYSTES DOIVE They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity
Alors que rien ne l'y autorise dans le TFUE, le lobbying est devenu institutionnelThey are relatively
dans transparent
l'UE avec des associations d'entreprise
Ces associations prennes Equality
pour la
of dure
accessd'application
L'obligation
both des dcisions
sides ofdethe
comptes
prises
They
discussionn'ont
areaucune
have notlearn
to transparent
lgitimit et les
and accept contacts
that qu'elles
the better peu
informed
also the Commission, theIntegrity;Equality of ac Nt the size of a lobbying They groupare
is important,
not transparent
only the
at all
qualification to contribut
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Other (please elaborate Un systme de complianc They are relatively transparent
Wichtig ist hier vor al Integrity;Equality of acc Der Einfluss der Lobbys They are relatively tran
No opinion They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
PURCHE' SIA DATA LA Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access
It is important to understandTheywhich
are highly
inputstransparent
from consultation and lobby groups
Equality of access;Othe They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
les thmes traits sont Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
seuls les citoyens doivenOther (please elaborate Vous ne devez pas avoirThey are not transparent at all
La rponse serait oui pe Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Every time that we have Integrity;Equality of acc see above They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
also as a former eu civi Integrity They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac small NGOs do not haveThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of ac Transparenz und demokrThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Il serait intressant de Equality of access;Othe Il faudrait que les lobb They are not transparent
Im Prinzip stimme ich deIntegrity;Equality of acc Nicht nur mehr TranspareThey are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access;Othe real effectivness of the They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac public hand support for They are relatively transparent
This question is oriented.Equality of access;Othe All minute of meetings inThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
The whole chain has to bIntegrity;Equality of ac transparency sees on theThey are relatively tran
The Commissionair Should Other (please elaborate Access for citizens, not They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
transparente LobbyarbeitIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
creare momenti di discu Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
It is the first tool agai Equality of access It used to say that even They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc objectivity, openness They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
No opinion They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access;Othe Concertation et co-constrThey are relatively transparent
Integrity At present, it feels like They are relatively transparent
Totalmente de acuerdo siIntegrity;Equality of ac Responder a intereses cThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity
Full disclosure is a given, as the monies to fund the
If there
EU come
is no from
integrity, They
the taxes
there of
canare
berelatively
each no
country.
reasontransparent
There
to trust
must
what
beindividuals
open scrutiny
are oth
do
Any payments made by lobbyIntegrity
groups or other interested
As othersparties
followmust
whatbe has
made
They
gone are
public,
before.
not as
transparent
well as any paid travel by official EU
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Il est important d'avoir Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Un lobbying thique et trIntegrity;Equality of ac La publicit. Il est imp They are relatively tran
Integrity They are highly transparent
Equality of access Kohrente Regelungen, They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac L'quit entre les diff They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of ac independent control of f They are not transparent
Integrity - Regelmiger Austaus They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Ease of access for peoplThey are relatively tran
Overordnet er det godt aIntegrity;Equality of ac Registret br vr oblig They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of acc Equality of access must They are not transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Les lobbyistes occupent Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Public disenchantment wiOther (please elaborate it is mostly about the qu They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
how do you define ethic Integrity;Equality of ac a better representation They are relatively tran
Les dcideurs politiques Integrity;Equality of acc Il faut liminer les risq They are relatively tran
La presence d'une majoriIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of ac Lobbyists and the represThey are not transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Gegenseitiger Respekt, IThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac Equality of access for b They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity They are highly transparent
I don't think it is at al Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Demasiada burocracia coIntegrity They are not transparent at all
Un control totalmente tr Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Sharing the special inte Integrity;Equality of acc All of the above demand They are relatively tran
Ethical and Transparent Il ntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
The terms "ethical" and Integrity;Equality of ac Only official and publicl They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
The EU transparency regis Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access;Othe Un encadrement stricte They are relatively transparent
It depends whom is lobbyIntegrity;Equality of ac Political bias They are not transparent
Je suis en faveur d'une Integrity;Equality of ac Clair encadrement du Lob They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac l'thique They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Le lobbying est une for Other (please elaborate L'Europe doit tre l' They are not transparent
Ethical and transparent Integrity;Equality of acc Absence of mandatory app They are not transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Legitimidad They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality
If delegates need lobby inputs because theyof access
are not capable to represent They are then
citizens, relatively transparent system doesn't work
the representatve
This might be done like this
Equality
consultation,
of accesswith a general
Transparency
and specific
goes part.
of coThey
I still would
are relatively
lease the
tran
final decision to each delegate
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc Selon impact du dossier They are relatively transparent
Le lobbying, mme transp Other (please elaborate Qu'ils [les groupes de p They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
I see lobbying generally Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Lobbying should be regulEquality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
ordinary citizens do not Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Full transparency is nec Integrity;Equality of acc Sincerity. Clarity. They are not transparent at all
Actividades de lobi sao Other (please elaborate Sou completamente contr They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access The Commission must publ They are not transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
A State is the incarnati Other (please elaborate Equality is a joke due t They are not transparent
Mesure qui me semblent indispensables pour assurer la transparence des re
Equality of access - Inscription obligatorie deThey
tousare
lesrelatively transparent
reprsentants d'interets privs dans ce reg
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
- cration d'un second registre consultable sur internet par chaque citoyen lis
Integrity;Equality of ac On a Board, apour
- Interdiction member mus
They
tout lu, are relatively
membre transparent
de la commision, ou fonctionnaire europp
Le registre actuel n'as Integrity;Equality of ac - Control exhaustif des revenusThey aredes notlus
transparent
et fonctionnaires
at all pendant leurs man
Le lobbiyng est du lobbying
Integrity;Equality of acc Par intgrit, j'entends They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
I think that lobbying in Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Die EU muss zwischen de Integrity;Equality of acc Politik muss wissen, we They are relatively transparent
Certain "bad lobbyists" l Integrity They are relatively transparent
Ethical rules should be Integrity;Equality of ac There should be an obligThey are not transparent
Transparency is vital for Integrity;Equality of acc these characteristics go They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
La transparence du lobbyIntegrity;Other (please un procd permettant dThey are relatively transparent
Other (please elaborate Najpodstatnejie je poznThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access Permettre aux lobby dispThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of ac When lobbying a committThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Il lobbismo etico e trasp Integrity;Equality of ac non tener conto solo dellThey are not transparent
Whilst transparency and integrity are important and certainly needed, the long
Non dmocratique Integrity;Equality of ac Le bien commun et non lThey are not transparent at all
Le lobbying, par dfiniti Other (please elaborate Il n'y a should
There pas dealso
solution They are
be a review not transparent
of existing rules and regulations to see whethe
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Other (please I also believe that one ofThey the principles
are not transparent
should be value for money in all ways
Integrity;Equality of ac Openess of the objectiveThey are not transparent at all
Integrity Objectivity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac non Profit Organisation They are relatively transparent
it makes it more profess Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
To an extent but ONLY ifIntegrity;Equality of ac Total honesty by the lob They are not transparent
"Ethical and transparent Other (please elaborate How about not having priv They are not transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
ALLOW LOBBYING ONLY Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac SME / SE inclusion They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Transparent governanceThey are not transparent at all
Only if tightly regulated Integrity;Equality of acc The biggest challenge isThey are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
lobbying is a serious br Other (please elaborate Europeans are not AmeriThey are not transparent
It would be better if th Integrity Integrity as integrity of They are relatively transparent
Would fully agree if only Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
I agree that it should be Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Ethical & transparant lo Other (please elaborate Equality and integrity do They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
It is a matter of definit Integrity;Equality of acc All representations shou They are not transparent
The amount of money one Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Not sure if there is a c Integrity Recognition of the voic They are relatively transparent
petitions are a better Other (please elaborate if at all it should be pub They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Agreements being madeThey are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Es fllt schwer, Lobbyis Integrity;Equality of acc Die positive Bercksicht They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Lobbying should not inclIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Define "ethical". Under No opinion They are not transparent at all
This question is way top Integrity;Equality of ac No linkage to personal be They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Only if said lobby has a Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
I agree that it helps pol Integrity;Equality of ac Transparency also helpsThey are relatively tran
Publication of the list o Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Everybody except the peo Integrity;Equality of ac Serious laws and boundsThey are not transparent
lobbying isnt bad in and Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Lobbying makes policy Integrity;Equality of ac Indepence of MEPs fromThey are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Lobbying helps provide aIntegrity;Equality of acmostly
platform from which The businesses
identification
Independent, of con
in-depth
can They
express
and are opinions
logical
their relatively transparent
reviewingandof the
views
content
on many
and merit
issuesofand
facts
po
Due to this one can argueIntegrity;Equality
that transparantoflobbying
ac can help policy development.
They are Itrelatively
is when tran
lobbying certain issues becomes
This is a begging the queOther (please elaborate Democratic governance sh No opinion
There is no ethical lobyi Equality of access It's the main problem. "GThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
It seems to me that in t Equality of access First I would shortly li They are not transparent
Policys should be develoIntegrity They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Policy should only be in Integrity;Equality of acc Lobbying groups have anThey u are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Enkel de groepen die ges No opinion No opinion
Technically, "Fully agree" would be the correct answer "Equality of access" includes financial equality of access - the money an orga
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Lobbying can help to bri Integrity;Other (please
But I had to downgrade, since you failed to ask the Citizens
This
(more should
means be
important) offer Theyactivity
that all lobbying
question: are notshould
transparent
requireatlittle
all monetary investment
as long as no money is i Equality of access They are not transparent at all
"Can sufficient ethics andIntegrity;Equality
transparency standards
of acc Inbeaddition,
established
the effectiveness
so that the
Theybenefits
gap
are between
relatively
of sensible
in-person
tran lobbying
lobbying
exceedby the
people
costinofBr
u
I think ethical lobbying i Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Possibly, because the spe Equality of access No opinion
Unternehmen knnen sich Integrity;Equality of ac keine Involvierung von They are not transparent
Integrity No opinion
Integrity;Other (please a complete register of l They are relatively transparent
EU policies should first Integrity They are not transparent at all
I am not very versed in t Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Other (please elaborate Lobbying is state sancti They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Lobbyists work like lawyers. They more money you Thehave,
integrity
the more
of lobbying
/ bettercan
lobbyists
alwaysyou understood
can afford.through
This means
transparency.
the average c
It's a legal bribe. Other (please elaborate No money / gain should They are relatively tran
I believe lobbying can beEquality
used forofgood,
accessbut like every
The more
system,
important fact They
it's currently thatare
is abused relatively
citizens havetransparent
for power by
barely
moreany powerful
knowledge
agents,
of who
and loth
Nothing like transparent Integrity;Equality of ac Decisions must be madeThey w are not transparent
I suggest more regulations, Integrity;Equality
more rules and ofmore
acc Iequal
believe
opportunities
lobbying should
for lobbying
They
be brought
areonrelatively
the
to behalf
the public,
tran
of citizens'
and openedinterests.
up even furthe
Integrity;Equality of ac Entgeltlosigkeit (entsch They are relatively transparent
Yes, ethical conduct andIntegrity;Equality of ac There needs to be a cleaThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Unless the issue is scie Other (please elaborate This survey is so obviou They are not transparent
Integrity I do not believe that equ They are relatively tran
Businesses hold more swa Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively tran
Depends and what is mea Integrity;Equality of ac Lobbying should only takThey are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of acc Ik kan er niks aan doen, They are not transparent
No opinion They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac No corporate agenda gea No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
I am concerned that wherNo opinion I do not understand the They are relatively tran
While I think that ehica Integrity Transparency is the keyst They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access Las consultas que hacenThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc Transparenz im Hinblick They are relatively transparent
Other (please elaborate Publicly available audio They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Lobbying needs to be balIntegrity;Equality of acc Lobbying is only one impo They are relatively transparent
No opinion They are not transparent at all
I believe lobbying allow No opinion They are relatively transparent
I am a member of DiEM25 Integrity;Equality of ac There should be regulatiThey are not transparent
Ethical in the sense of " Integrity;Other (please Again it must be made clThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Le contrle des lus, desThey are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Lobbying helps businesse Integrity;Equality of ac To fully understand the They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
in an ideal world, it migh Integrity;Equality of ac How come companies can They(u are not transparent at all
Yes, under the condition Integrity;Equality of ac To prevent even a hint o They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access
'Lobbying' represents a wide range of activities. While it certainly helps policy Theydevelopment,
are not transparent at all needs to be raised, e
the question
Concordo, desde que o gIntegrity;Equality of ac The No financial
existncia de confli
means Theyorganisations.
of lobby are relatively tranIt is clear that for-profit lobbies ca
It is not as much the activity
Integrity;Equality
of lobbying itself
of ac
thatThis
needsbegs
to be
theregulated
question (though
upThey
to what
are
thisnot
point
is transparent
obviously
this financial
very mportant),
inequality isbut
allowed
these dis
to d
I object to this question Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
It can certainly help pol Integrity No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
S'il est effectivement bi Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
The problem
Lobbying hasisnothat lobbying
place inOthercan seriously
(please lacks regulation,
elaborate Complete ban and of
frequently
lobbying Tend up as
hey are notdisguised
transparent corruption and/or manipulation
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
It might also be usefull toEquality
be able of
to access
point out easily which politicians haveThey closeare
relations with whichatlobbies,
not transparent all and highlight it d
Needs to be very transpaIntegrity;Equality of access They are highly transpar
The second point of the problem is that it's less lobbyism in itself that is an issue rather than the fact that a lot of them are lobb
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Equality of access
A good example would be watching how Apple lobbied Transparency
against tax
andpolicy No opinion
identification
and crackdowns
of lobbieson andfraud,
theirbecause
targettedtheir
politicians
interests
seem
we
All parties affected by a Integrity;Equality of ac Citizen's opinions on theThey are not transparent
While they should be allowed Integrity;Equality
to make theirofcase,
ac Putting
it should
forms
be inon
public
how in
lobbyism
such
Theycases
are
should
relatively
and/or
happenrecorded
tranmight properly
also help;
(orfor
atexample
least theib
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Definition von "ethisch Integrity;Other (please Kontrollmglichkeiten They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access;Other (please elabo They are relatively transparent
Equality of access;Othe Falls nicht vorgesehen: They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Corporate and "for-profitIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of acc There is too much of a teThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity They are relatively tran
Pour le domaine financieIntegrity;Equality of acc La logique de "l'intrt They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Decisionmaking without Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access;Othe El de representar el inte They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of ac Access to everything : f They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
I do not know if EU takesIntegrity;Equality of ac Although people can expr They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
This makes only the politIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
It is important you hear it from my point of view and
It isthat
important
is of a Peruvian
you hear Citizen
it from my
whopoint
lovesofhis
viewcountry
and that
deeply
is of and
a Peruvian
is extremely
Citiz
BUT I will talk on behalf of the people who are showing BUT I will theirtalk
outrage
on behalf
due of to the
this people
decision. whoThearefactshowing
is that their
throughout
outragethisdueLEGA
to th
Other (please elaborate Anti-corruption - transpa They are relatively tran
And that is the very thingIntegrity;Equality
is in question NOW of acandAnd
I Ithink
think
that
ayouis the
should
watchdog verykeepiThey
take
thingunder
is in are
question
great consideration
NOW
relatively and Ithe
transparent think
following:
you should take und
WHY did they (JNE) act the way they did, of
Integrity;Equality I am sure
accessWHY thedid actions
they (JNE)
that put actTODOS
the
They way
arePOR
they EL
did,PERU
relatively I am sure
out the
transparent of campaign
actions thatwereputlong
TOD b
WHY
I fully did it happen
support at that
the noti specific moment,
Integrity;Equality of please
ac WHY takedid
Maintaining a look
it happen
a at theat polls
reasonable that historical
Theyspecific moment,
are not data for the
please
transparent last take
90 days
a lookandatyoull
the polls
see thhi
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Please also focus on the WHO, who actually shared Pleaselightalso
on thefocus
error
onmadethe WHO, by the
whopolitical
actually
party
shared
whichlight
greatly
on the
benefit
errorthe
made
otheb
There exists positive lob Integrity;Equality of ac Checking the organisation They are relatively tran
Es
Butwre
mostschn, wennplease
Importantly di Integrity;Equality of accthis
question the WHY Es sollten
ButJNE most maximal
official
Importantly
did not2 TreThey
please
show more are leniency
not transparent
question the WHY
towards this the
JNEdemocratic
official didprocess
not show by
And that for some reasonIntegrity;Equality
the JNE judgments of access
is more
And that forgiven
for some
and Ireason
am sure They arewill
theshe
JNE relatively
be allowtransparent
judgments toiscontinue.
more forgiven and I am sure
I pray you can read this message
Integrity;Equality
and canofnotice
acc Ihow prayfor youmecan andread
thosethiswho
message
They I share
are and
highly
the can
same
transpar
notice
concernhow there
for meis and
clearly
thosea case
who f
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;Other (please Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Transparency is indeed important. But it is not so much about 'shedding light
Integrity Les citoyens ne sont pasThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access Furthermore, there a lot more They reasons
are relatively tran
for lobbying regulations. An important
The EU parliament as well Integrity;Equality
as the national of access (which indirectly fillThey
parliaments are relatively
the important tran in the EU institutions) are ele
positions
Having said that, it is clearIntegrity;Other
that unethical(please
(what everThey that canis also
supposed
directly to reduce
mean
Theyprecisely)
the
are amount
not transparent
andofintransparent
corruption in the lobbying
institutions.
is a lotE.g
wo
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Lobbying ist meines EracEquality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access - Enforcement of compliance They(both
are relatively
on the sidetransparent
of lobbyists as well as on the s
Integrity;Equality of ac Voorkomen dat commercil No opinion
- Accountability (of the EU institutions by publishing the influence of interest r
Integrity;Equality of ac dokadne
- Full disclosureinformacje, cz They are
(of information onrelatively transparent
representatives as well as meetings etc. o
Ethical and transparent Integrity;Equality of ac - Mandatory register They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Was ist untadelig? Wer Equality of access They are relatively transparent
This question is way too Integrity;Equality of acc protection of whistleblo They are not transparent at all
Meiner Meinung nach kn Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of acc Participants should rece They are relatively transparent
If all lobbying were eth Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Pienamente d'accordo nella Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are not transparent
Yes it can help policy de Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Not sure how ethical "et Integrity;Equality of ac Policy makers (as they aThey are not transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Lobbying id emulating thIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Lobbying is corruption Other (please elaborate Lobbyists should not be They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Other (please elaborate Openbaar maken van deThey i are not transparent
Integrity They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Decisions must be takenIntegrity;Equality
after consultationofprocedure
access with all interested parts.
They are relatively transparent
Lobbying is part of consultation procedure.
We cannot rely on ethicalIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Consultation is conducted through Transparency Registry (TR) in two levels: a) by accredited entities who can express opinion
Integrity
Any 'Lobbying' procedure is compulsory to be held within TR frame. They are relatively tran
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;No opinion Eine transparente
All opinions are expressed in written or oral (videoPublicity VerwaThey are relatively
recordings) and follow text limits and time tran
recordings rules provided by TR,
Integrity;Equality of access
All formal and informal institutions involved with the
All decision
participants
making They
(policy-makers,are
process must relatively
lobbyists,
take under transparent
etc) consideration
must give in public
opinions
their
expresse
positio
Any decision taken MUST Integrity;Equality
be subjected toof confirmation
ac Any discussion,
by the European
conversation,
Parliament.
They are
etc relatively
taking place
tranbetween interested parts and
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Lobbying allows policy Equality of access They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively tran
It should be completely tIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
I agree that transparencyIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;Other (please Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
"Ethisch untadelig" kan Integrity Gewhlte Politiker sollt They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They
die Politik sollte sich darauf are relatively
besinnen, transparent
fr das Gemeinwohl der individuellen B
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Other (please elaborate They are not transparent at all
Policy makers are faced Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Transparenz in der Lobby Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Equality
Both are relative terms doesn't of access
says about what people actually do. They are relatively transparent
Other (please elaborate "Power tends to corrupt They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Der einzelne Brger soll Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Currently there are too mIntegrity;Equality of ac full disclosure of docu They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Citizens, however, do noIntegrity;Equality of ac Democratic legitimacy (toThey are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
. Integrity;Equality of acc Policy development depend They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
There should be no lobbyi Other (please elaborate Institutions of the EU sh They are not transparent at all
We need to remember that Integrity;Equality of ac It is about engagement -They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
It depends on the ethics Integrity;Equality of ac Please see previous co They are not transparent
Qui dcide qu'un lobby eIntegrity They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac 1. Timeliness of consul They are relatively tran
The transparency registeIntegrity;Equality of ac Comprehensiveness: It isThey are relatively tran
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Politicians should stop l Integrity;Equality of ac Standing on the side of They are not transparent
Transperency is a must iIntegrity;Equality of ac Interest representitives No opinion
Es besteht aber ein UnteIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Die sterreichischen Ge Integrity Transparenz der VerwaltThey are relatively tran
Best if you left policy Other (please elaborate The most important princiThey are not transparent
Transparenz in der Lobby Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity La publicit des documents They are relatively
servant transparent
l'argumentaire de chacun (ou les rfren
A condition que cela s'a Integrity;Equality of ac They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Policy makers should takNo opinion They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity Less than lobbying, moreThey listensaretorelatively
citizens transparent
and independent expert.
Il lobbying pu contribui Equality of access;Othe Limit Ferrea regolamentazione
conflicts of interest,They at possibly,
and are relativelyfocustransparent
on people without conflicts of in
Integrity;Equality of ac Example: Miguel ARIAS They CAETE are not
hastransparent
ties to fossilatfuels,
all it should not be dire
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access I think access by lobyistsThey should arebe relatively
very limited.transparent
Maybe max one hour a day
A parte il fatto che sare Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
I think it helps, but I Integrity;Equality of ac Also I think that with preventing They are badnotlobbying/
transparent bias there is a neccesity that co
Integrity They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;Other (please Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac No basta con el principi They are highly transpar
i hate the eu , will soon No opinion as above , dont want it , They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
In general, ethical and transparent
No opinionlobbying helpsTo policy
achieve
development
a sound framework
andThey
it is important
for relatively
are relations
to makewith sure
lobbyists,
transparent that the
theprocesses
following wouldto se
la socit civile n'est Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Transparent lobbying is about more than just the Stopping EU's lobby the
transparency
privileged access
register. byThe
business
Commission
interests:should
Lobbyists
extendrepresenting
the wider t
Was ist denn unter "ethi Integrity;Equality of ac To achieveAn
Kontrolle! a sound framework
GesprcheNo for relations with lobbyists, the following would
opinion
Das Transparenzregister
Meanwhile, the European Integrity;Equality
hat auch und vor
Ombudsman ofallem
has access
den
Eine
seriously Zweck,
transparente
Stopping
criticisedEinflsse
lobbying vonThey
Verwaltung
the Commission
on behalf ofare
for not
Einzelpersonen,
setzt
'toxic' transparent
itsvoraus,
poor
industries: atethical
Unternehmen
dassAn die all
implementationvon ihr
und
of getroffenen
Organisationen
approach
the World Ents
to Health
lobby
Zur Erluterung: Die Europische
Integrity;Equality
Kommission Stopping
of accwei um und thebetont
privileged access
seit einigen
They are by relatively
Jahrenbusiness interests: der
die Bedeutung
transparent Lobbyists representing
Zusammenarbeit m
In general,it ethical
shouldand transparent lobbying helps policy development is and it isinstitutions:
important
ethical.to make sure that the processes to se
However, be pointed
Other out
(please
that lobbying
elaborate which
Ethicsis rules
transparent
for those not
in the
No
always
opinion ItLobbyists
is not justmay
about
make
rules
fullfordisclosures
lobbyists,
Stopping lobbying on behalf of 'toxic' industries: An ethical approach to lobby
Transparent lobbying is aboutIntegrity;Equality
more than justof access
the EU's lobby transparencyThey register.are The
relatively transparent
Commission should extend the wider t
Integrity;Equality of access Ethics rules for those in the They are relatively
institutions: It is transparent
not just about rules for lobbyists,
Eine Transparenz
However, it shouldinbeder Integrity
pointed out that lobbying which is transparent is notThey always areethical.
relatively tran may make full disclosures
Lobbyists
Other (please elaborate No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Transparency is not the Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Transparenz in der LobbIntegrity They are relatively transparent
Transparenz in der LobbIntegrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Any kind of lobbying by sIntegrity They are not transparent
Decision making processe Integrity;Equality of ac Publication of lobbying bThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
I take 'lobbying' to mea Integrity;Equality of ac It seems that access to They are relatively transparent
Trust in EU institutions isIntegrity;Equality
essential for the ofmaintenance
access and protection of European unity. In my
They are relatively experience of teaching studen
transparent
No opinion They are relatively transparent
Transparency of lobbyingNo activities
opinionis crucial to help stem the tide of scepticism. They are In Ireland,
relatively the Regulation of Lobbying Act, 201
transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
The Freedom of Information Act, 2014, and subsequent guidelines to Public Service Bodies, set out greater openness and tran
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;Other (please Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
The EU should continually Integrity
show Member States that verytransparency
hard to achieve (intbest
is the Theyoption
are relatively
in the 21sttrancentury, and it should lead the
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Transparency can help policy Integrity
development by focusingLobbying bureaucratic
regulations bodies
areTheyon the
are needrelatively
for ethically,
tran environmentally, and soc
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transpar
ALTER-EU
Die deutsche considers
Wirtschaftthat, in general, ethical
Integrity;Other (pleaseandDietransparent
Regulierung lobbying
der Inthelps
Theypolicy development
are relatively tran and it is important to make su
All meetings with lobby Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
A more pertinent
lobying question would perhaps
accessbe:von
what is ethical and transparent lobbying? This consultation focuses on the lobby
Oberstezoals het sollte
Prioritt nu geesEquality
sein, die ofEinflsse Organisationen
The first question und They
Personen,
above referred
aredie not transparent
toEinzelinteressen
ethical lobbying which goes further than t
vertreten zu regulieren Integrity;Equality
bzw. offenzulegen. of access wird allgemein als unrechtmige
Lobbying They are relatively transparent
Einflussnahme auf das Gesetzgebungs
The Commission's November 2014 transparency Stopping
reforms whichthe privileged
prevent commissioners
access by business and senior
interests:officials
Lobbyists
from meeting
representing
with
Integrity;No
"Ethical" is inherently subjective. Same opinion Eine transparente
applies toIntegrity:
"transparent".
applies VerwaThey
trhoughout theare relatively
entire life tran
of an individual/organisation
Prioritising the public interest: Public and private (business) interests can and conth
Therefore this statement Integrity;Other
is biased and technically
(please
We also note that the European Ombudsman hasPreventing Other:
written reasons
to encourage
seriously criticisedfor lobbying
unscrupulous a positive
Theyshould
the Commission are answer,
not
be
lobbying: Lobbying transparent
clearly
in a
for its poorclearly
indicated
in the manipulative
to prevent
implementation
context of a conflictway
"covert"
of the World op
of inte
Die Senatskanzlei wrdi Integrity Severely restricting lobbying Theyon are relatively
behalf transparent
of 'toxic' industries: An ethical approac
Transparency is only oneOther element,
(please
albeit
elaborate
an essential
All lobby
one,transparency
of ethical lobbying.
rules
No opinion
must
But ethical
be placed lobbying
in thisgoes
wider,farethical
beyond context.
transparen
Kaikenlainen salailu on Equality of access They are not transparent
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Wichtig ist u. a. die Sicherstellung, dass nicht lediglich Partikularinteressen d
Lobbying does not help p
Integrity;Equality of
Es sollte eine Selbstverstndlichkeit sein, dass sich ac What would help policy anThey
d are not transparent
TheInteressenvertreter
die besonders
integrity ofviele die geltenden
both finanzielle
lobbyists Ressourcen
and Gesetze
policy-makersfr dieis und Regeln to halten,
Interessenvertretung
essential so wie
aufbr
the effective so
Integrity und wichtig, wenn
Transparenz ist dann zielfhrend Zustzlich sollte Bercksichtigung relatively
Gleichberechtigten
sie dazu fhrt, dass
Zugang They
ein are
Mitglied
verstehen deswir
finden, transparent
Europischen
als
dass Mglichkeit Parlamentes
ffentliche fr jede Person
Behrden oder
der der
und
Mitg
Seine
SoundGrenzen liegen allerdings
policy development Equality darin,
requiresof access
woand
data zu evidence
viel Unter
Transparenz
Sound gleichberechtigtem
regionaler
and undIntransparenz
lokaler
policymaking
often They
Ebene
the industry
requiresZugang
erzeugt.
areisfull
sowie
that
the relatively
verstehen
Aus
ihre
most
range diesem
tran
wir
Gremien,
directly
of auerdem
viewsGrund
and sollteauch
Zusammenschlsse
impacted das
positions
will be dieTranspare
the
to Freiheit
be und
best
heardVb
(pe
Entgegen der in den MedIntegrity;Equality of ac Teil der Multi-Level-Governance They areinrelatively
der Europischen
tran Union und dem Gemein
Where trade-offs between Equality
competingof access
public policyButobjectives
achieving have
equality They
to beofmadeaccessitare not
isalso transparent
atrequires at all
EU levelrecognition
the shared of responsibility
the disparitiesofth
Integrity;Equality of acc They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Les lobby font leur trava Integrity;Equality of acc il est trange qu'il ex They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc Il suffit qu'un lobby so They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
No opinion Przede wszystkim wtpliw No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
I worry that lobbyists representing powerful organisations or wealthy individualsare
Integrity;Equality of ac Corporate interest groupThey have relatively
much moretransparent
opportunity to influence polic
It is not clear to me how Integrity;Equality
deep some lobbyist of ac
are involved
There needs in policy
to bemaking.
a mech They are not transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
le lobbying peut-il tre Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Die (in)offiziellen Lob Other (please elaborate Ein technokratisch-reprThey are not transparent
gli interessi specifici d Integrity I responsabili politici, They are not transparent
Jedoch ist eine einseiti Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Dal mio punto di vista Other (please elaborate Inserire tetti di stipendi They are not transparent at all
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;Other (please Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Other (please Responsibility with compThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Lobbying darf nicht von Other (please elaborate Da sich Konzerne, im b They are not transparent
Was genau ist ethisch? DIntegrity;Equality of ac Verffentlichung von Ha They are not transparent
The adjective ethical is Integrity;Equality of ac Integrity is impossible t They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Are lobbyists registered Integrity;Other (please Full disclosure of the i They are relatively transparent
ethical is a loaded term iIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc Lobbying for essential s They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Il convient de distinguer Integrity They are relatively transparent
ethical and transparent Integrity;Equality of ac registration of the infor They are relatively tran
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;Other (please Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Die Transparenz in der LNo opinion They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access;Othe Las reuniones con grande They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
All EU decision-makers sOther (please elaborate Meetings with big busineNo opinion
Alles muss transparent sEquality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are not transparent at all
We need politics to be o Integrity;Equality of acc What is good for profit i They are not transparent at all
o dleitch veciach b Other (please elaborate transparentnos a intitThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
We, the citizens of Euro Integrity;Equality of ac The basic principle is t They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Business is not a priori Integrity;Equality of acc Information in understanNo opinion
Other (please elaborate strengere Regeln fr bei No opinion
Every EU citizen should Other (please elaborate Meetings with big busines No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
There should be no secre Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
I also think non-transpar Integrity;Equality of acc code of conduct like se They are not transparent
1. In general this is true, Equality of accessin lobbying is more than just theThey
but transparency lobbyare not transparent at all
register.
2. All EU decision-makers Integrity;Equality
must be bannedoffrom access
meeting
1.Meetingswithwith
unregistered They
big business are relatively
lobbyists
lobbies andmustmust transparent
be be
limited
obligedin number
to publishandon-line
betterlist
ba
3. Meetings with big business No opinion
lobbies must be limited
2. Tougher
in number
rules
andmustbetter
notThey
balanced
onlyareapply
notthrough
to
transparent
lobbyists
interactions
but alsowith
theother
institutions.
stakehold
Str
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Ethical and transparent lobbying helps policy
Integrity;Equality of development;
To achievethus
access a sound
it is important
framework tofor
make
Theyregister.
are relations
sure that
relatively withthe
lobbyists,
processes
transparent the following
to securewould
ethic
In general this is true, but transparency in lobbying is more than just the lobby
"Contribuerait",
All s'il tait should
EU decision-makers Integrity;Equality
be bannedoffromac meeting
Des contrles drastique They
with unregistered are not
lobbyists andtransparent
should be obliged to publish online lis
However, transparent lobbying Equality is of
about more thanStopping
access just the EU's
the privileged
lobby transparency
accessare by business
register. Theinterests:
CommissionLobbyists
must representin
extend the
Meetings with big business lobbies should be limited
Meetings
in number
with big betterThey
andbusiness lobbiesnot
balanced withtransparent
should interactions
be limitedat with
all
in number
other stakeholders
and better bai
This is our democracy and Other
NOT(please
a corporacy.
elaborate Tougher rules should notNo onlyopinion
apply for lobbyists but also the institutions. Stri
The European Ombudsman has seriously criticised Yetthe
theCommission
Commissionfor has
itscommitted
poor implementation
to deliverof balance
the WorldinHealth
stakeholder
Organisat
repr
It also helps improve th Integrity;Equality of acc It's also about tackling They are not transparent
The fact to
It needs that
beso much o
pointed outIntegrity;Equality of access
that lobbying which happens
Stoppingto be
lobbying
transparent They
on behalf are
isofnot notindustries:
'toxic' transparent
necessarily alsoAnethical.
ethical Lobbyists
approach may to lobby
mak
The existence of every mEquality of access;Othe Tougher rules should notNo opinion
Lobbying is not necessarily Otherethically
(pleaseneutral.
elaborate Ethics rules for those in the No institutions:
opinion It is not just about rules for lobbyists,
The EU is supposed to reOther (please elaborate Lobbying by businesses They sh are not transparent
I am disgusted by EU polOther (please elaborate I consider the receiving They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Decision makers MUST be Other (please elaborate As mentioned above, meet They are not transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Bei Bedarf
Full ethical sollte die Po Integrity;Equality
and transparent of ac
lobyying requires Kompetenz,
not Meetingswith Toleranz,
only that lobbyists GaThey
should
big business be are notshould
registered
lobbies transparent
but also at
be that all
EU decision
limited makers and
in number are
Other (please elaborate interactions
Meetings withwith big busines
other They are relatively
stakeholders tran civil society organization
including
Integrity;Equality of ac public interest. The most They areeffectiveand
relatively tran ethical way to stop privilege
EU-EntscheidungstrgerIntegrity;Equality
s of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
In general this is true, butIntegrity;Other
transparency (please
in lobbying is more than just the lobby
mehr Transparenz Theyregister.
are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting accessMeetingswith withunregistered
big business They are relatively
lobbyists
lobbies and
should tran
should
be limited
be obliged
in number
to publish
and better
online ba
lis
the problem is that toda Integrity again, i stongly doubt th They are not transparent
Meetings with big business
Yes but transparency Integrity;Equality
lobbies
in lobbying is should ofbeaccess
more than limited
justTougher
theinlobby
number
rules should notThey
and better
register. only are
balanced
applynotfortransparent
with lobbyists
interactions at with
but all
alsoother
the institutions.
stakeholdersStrii
All EU decision-makers Other (please
should elaborate
be banned from meeting
Meetings with
with
unregistered No lobbyists
big business opinion
lobbiesand should
should
be limited
be obliged
in number
to publish
and online
better
Meetings with big business Integrity;Equality
lobbies shouldof acc 75-80%
be limited in aller
Toughernumber Meetings
rules should f not
and betterNo only
opinion
balanced
applywithfor lobbyists
interactionsbut with
alsoother
the institutions.
stakeholder S
Other (please elaborate No opinion
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access;Othe oikeudenmukaisuus, rehThey
Meetings with big business lobbies are not transparent
should at all
be limited in number and better ba
In general this is true, butIntegrity;Equality
transparency in of ac Tougher
lobbying Orientierung
is morerules
thanam Gemeinw
should
just thenot They
lobby are notfortransparent
onlyregister.
apply lobbyists but at all
also the institutions. Stri
Other (please elaborate They are relatively tran
I would go much further Integrity;Other (please I would go much further They are not transparent at all
It is also a major founda Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
A seemingly transparent Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access;Othe No more privileged accesNo opinion
Integrity No opinion
Not only does transparenc Equality of access It is also about oversigh They are relatively tran
Other (please elaborate Ausgewogene Balance zw They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
In general this is true, Integrity;Equality of acc All EU decision-makers sThey are relatively tran
In general this is true, butIntegrity;Equality
transparency in of accessis more than just the lobby
lobbying Theyregister.
are relatively transparent
Ich EU
All denke solchen Gesprshould
decision-makers Integrity;Equality
be bannedoffrom access
meeting with unregisteredThey are not
lobbyists andtransparent
should be obliged to publish online lis
Meetings with big business Integrity;Equality
lobbies shouldofbeaccess
limited in number and betterThey balanced
are relatively
with interactions
tran with other stakeholders i
Wer bestimmt die Mastbe der Lobbyarbet? Ethisch untadelig und transparent sind doch uerst schwammige Begriffe.
Darlegung
Es kommt auf eine ausgewogene Gewichtung der Lobbyarbeit an. Und diese ist momentan m.E. nichtall
smtlicher LoOther (please elaborate offene Darlegung der KoThey are not transparent at gegeben.
All
DieEU decision-makers
Einflunahme sIntegrity;Equality
bestimmter Gruppen und of Institutionnen
acc Tougher rules should notTheyund
ist berdimensional are nicht
not transparent
mit dem Anspruch nach einer transpa
Lobbyarbeit mub zwingend Integrity;Equality of access
ffentlich und sauber dokumentiert sein. Alle Brger They are not transparent
mssen berblick berat all die Einflunahme bes
Integrity;Equality of ac Volle Transparenz smmtThey are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
MEPs are paid to express Other (please elaborate lobbyists should be bannThey are not transparent
wergeneral
In bestimmt
thiswas ethisch
is true, butOtransparency
ther (please elaborate
in lobbying keinerlei
is morewirtschaftlich
than just the lobbyTheyregister.
are not transparent
All EU decision-makers Integrity;Equality
should be banned of access
from meeting
Meetings withwith
unregistered
a) But lobbying has to be fully transparent. That means more than just a lobbying big businessThey areregister.
lobbyists
lobbies not
and transparent
shouldshould at all
be limited
be obliged
in number
to publish
and online
better lis
ba
Meetings with big business Other
lobbies
(please
should
elaborate
be limited
Tougher
in number
rules
b) All EU decision makers must be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists.should
and better
not No
only
balanced
opinion
apply with
for lobbyists
interactionsbut with
also other
the institutions.
stakeholdersStri i
Integrity;Equality
c) The above must be obliged to publish on line all of accessa)Refer
meetingsto d)with
above. They are not transparent
lobbyists and must also apply to all EU employees not just se
d) Meetingsthis
In general must be balanced
is true, butIntegrity;Equality
to includeinstakeholders
transparency of ac b)Tougher
lobbying and other
is more rulesjust
than civil
shouldsociety
the not
Noonly
lobby organisations,
opinion
apply for lobbyists
register. NOT ONLY but BIG
also BUSINESS
the institutions.
CONC S
Integrity;Equality
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meetingof access Meetings
with unregistered They
with big business are
lobbyists not
lobbies transparent
andshould
shouldbe at all
belimited
obliged in to
number
publishandonline
better
lis
Meetings with big business Other
lobbies
(please
should
elaborate
be limited Tougher
in number
Meetings rules
with and
bigshould
betternot
businessNobalanced
only
opinion
apply
lobbies with for
should interactions
lobbyists
be limitedbutwith
in also
other
number thestakeholders
institutions.
and better baSi
Meetings with big busineOther (please elaborate Tougher rules should notThey only are
applyrelatively
for lobbyists
tran but also the institutions. Stri
In general this is true, No opinion Tougher rules should notNo opinion
Bei aufgeklrten und int Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
All EU decision-makers sIntegrity;Equality of ac Independent assessmentThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Meetings with big busineOther (please elaborate Tougher rules should notNo opinion
Anything less lends itse Integrity;Equality of acc Current method tips balan They are not transparent at all
Citizens of the EU shoul Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Lobbyarbeit ist nie positivEquality of access They are not transparent at all
Meetings with big busineIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
die Unabhngigkeit beraIntegrity;Equality of acc Lobbyarbeit mu Transpa They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Fr die Teilnahme von L Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent
Lobbyarbeit ist im echte Integrity;Equality of ac ffentlich zugngliche They are not transparent at all
WeInare convinced
general this isthat
true,adIbut
ntegrity;Equality
transparency of in access
lobbying is more than just theThey lobbyare relatively tran
register.
Integrity;Equality
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meetingof access Meetings with
with
unregistered They
big business are notand
lobbyists
lobbies transparent
shouldshould
be limited
be obliged
in number
to publish
and online
better
Meetings with big business Equality of access
lobbies should be limited Tougher
in number
rules should
and better They
not areapply
only relatively
balanced with transparent
for lobbyists
interactions but with
alsoother
the institutions.
stakeholder S
Other (please elaborate No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac In order to rule out unfa They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Other (please elaborate Wichtig
Das ist u.mit
Treffen a. Lobbyis
die Sicherstellung,
No opinion dass nicht lediglich
In general this is true, but transparency in lobbying is more than just the
Partikularinteressen lobby
derjenigen register.
zum Zuge kommen,
All EU decision-makers Integrity;Equality
should be bannedoffrom accessmeeting
Meetings
die besonderswith
with
unregistered
big business
viele
They
finanzielle
are relatively
lobbyists
lobbies and
should
Ressourcen shouldtransparent
be
fr limited
be obliged
die in number
to publish
Interessenvertretungand online
better lis
b
Equality of access
Meetings with big business lobbies should be limited Tougher
in number
rules
aufbringen knnen. should
and better
notNo onlyopinion
balanced
apply with
for lobbyists
interactions but with
also other
the institutions.
stakeholders Str
Other (please elaborate Zustzlich sollte Bercksichtigung No opinionfinden, dass ffentliche Behrden der
In general this is true, Integrity;Equality of ac Mitgliedstaaten
Meetings with big aufbusines No opinion
nationaler,
Integrity;Equality of access regionaler und lokaler Ebene Theysowieare notihre Gremien, at
transparent Zusammenschlsse
all und V
Lobbyarbeit mu transpaIntegrity;Other (please wie Meindie EU-Institutionen
Eindruck ist, da They are not transparent at all
Wenn es keine Entkoppelu Integrity;Other (please Wichtig Teil
Wofr ist u. a.
derstehen die Sicherstellung,
Multi-Level-Governance
unsere VertThey areinnot dass
der nicht lediglich
Europischen
transparent Union und dem Gemein
at all
Partikularinteressen
verpflichtet sind. Ihrederjenigen
Teilhabe am zum Zuge kommen, und ihre Abstimmung mit
Legislativprozess
Integrity;Equality of acc Posebej pomembno je nae They are relatively tran
die
denbesonders viele finanzielle
EU-Institutionen hat daher Ressourcen
eine andere fr die Interessenvertretung
Qualitt als das Lobbying durch
Integrity;Equality
Entgegen der in den Medien teilweise verbreiteten of accessaufbringen
private
Ansicht,oder knnen.
dass
wirtschaftliche They are notSie
Akteure. transparent
unterliegen at auch
all selbst
Lobbyarbeit hat immer dOther (please
Lobbying/Interessenvertretung per se problematisch elaborate Interessensvertreter
Zustzlich
sei, ist sollte
Antikorruptionsregelungen hanThey
Bercksichtigung
die Wichtigkeit are not transparent
(z. B. finden, at all3 Abs.
dass ffentliche
42 BeamtenStG, Behrden
2 TVD). der
Der
Essential for a healthy Equality of
hervorzuheben, dass Expertise auf direktem Wege access Big business
Mitgliedstaaten
Verhaltenskodex has far
auf too They
nationaler,
an die Entscheidungstrger are not transparent
der EU entspricht ohnehin den ethischen Anforderungen an
Mit den Adjektiven
weitergegeben wird,ethisch untadelig
um Integrity;Equality
eine und transparent
hinreichende ofFaktenbasis wirzu
ac regionaler
ffentlichenhier volle
und Zustimmung
lokaler
schaffen.
Dienst. Ebene
Theysowiesuggeriert.
are Solche
ihre Gremien,
relatively tran Art von Fragestellungen
Zusammenschlsse undw V
Die Relitt der Lobbyarbeit schaut jedoch of
Integrity;Equality anders
access als die
wie untadelig und transparent
EU-Institutionen They are aus.not
Nicht umsonst at
transparent wenden
all sich die Brger zu
Vielseitig Informationen Equality of access Teil der Multi-Level-Governance
Zuarbeit und Beratung mThey areinnot dertransparent
Europischen Union und dem Gemein
Solche Vorschlge wren unter anderen: verpflichtet sind. Ihre Teilhabe am Legislativprozess und ihre Abstimmung mit
1) Entscheidungstrger drfen Integrity sich nicht mit unregistrierten
Treffen mit Lobbyisten
Lobbyistenhat They
treffen.
von are not
groen transparent in at all Anzahl beschrnkt w
den EU-Institutionen daher eineFirmen
anderesolltenQualitt derals das Lobbying durch
It must
Entgegenbe fully transpa
2) Entscheidungstrger
der in den Medien Integrity;Equality
mssen of
ihre Treffen
teilweise acc See first
mit Lobbyisten
verbreiteten private
Ansicht, comment.
oder Mayb
verffentlichen. They
wirtschaftlicheDas
dass are relatively
betrifft
Akteure. Sie alle transparent
30,000 Beamte.
unterliegen auch selbst
Solange
3) Treffendurch diese Lobb
mit Lobbyisten
Lobbying/Interessenvertretung Integrity;Equality
von international ofagierenden
access
per se problematisch Strenge Firmen
Verhaltensregeln
diesollten
Antikorruptionsregelungen
sei, ist in der
Wichtigkeit They
fr are
Anzahl
(z.die not
42 transparent
B. Parlamentarier
beschrnkt
BeamtenStG, werdenat all
und Kommissionsmitgliedern
und
3 Abs.nur2inTVD).
ausgegliche
Der
Other (please
hervorzuheben, dass Expertise auf direktem Wege elaborate Verhaltenskodex
an die Entscheidungstrger No opinion
der EU entspricht ohnehin den ethischen Anforderungen an
weitergegeben
In general this iswird,
true,um
butIntegrity;Equality
eine hinreichende
transparency in ofFaktenbasis
ac ffentlichen
lobbying is more zu schaffen.
Dienst.
than Theyregister.
just the lobby are relatively tran
All EU decision-makers should Integrity;Equality
be bannedoffromaccess
meeting
Meetings withwith
unregistered
big business They are not
lobbyists
lobbies and transparent
shouldshouldbe limitedat all
be obligedin number
to publish
and online
better lis
ba
Meetings with big business Otherlobbies
(please
should
elaborate
be limited
Tougher
in number
rules should
and better notNoonly
balanced
opinion
applywith
for lobbyists
interactions but with
alsoother
the institutions.
stakeholdersStrii
Seul les lobbys dfendant Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Selbst wenn es von den Equality of access;Othe Es muss sich um PersonThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Ik
In ben het er
general thisgedeeltelij
is true, butIntegrity;Equality
transparency in of accessis more than just the lobby
lobbying Theyregister.
are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists They are relatively
and should transparent
be obliged to publish online lis
Lobbyist
Meetings should
with big be forbi
business Other (please
lobbies elaborate
should be No
limited gifts
Meetings
in OR
number money
with big
and
In general this is true, but transparency in lobbying is more than just the lobby register. accep
business
better T hey are
balanced
lobbies not
withtransparent
should interactions
be at with
limited all
in number
other stakeholders
and better bai
Other (please elaborate
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting Tougher
Es solltewith
Meetings rules
ein
with should
besseres
unregistered not
big business No
only opinion
apply
Gleichgewicht
lobbyists
lobbiesand for lobbyists
zwischen
shouldshould but
Treffen
be limited
be also
inmit
obliged the institutions.
toLobbyisten
numberpublish derStri
and online
better Gr
lis
ba
Other (please elaborate
Meetings with big business lobbies should be limited Es sollten
Tougher
in number klare und
rules should relativ
and better They
not only strenge
are
balanced relatively
Regeln
applywith geschaffen
tran
for lobbyists
interactions but withwerden
alsoother fr den
the institutions.Wechs
stakeholdersStrii
Other (please elaborate No opinion
Sehr wichtig ist u. a. die Sicherstellung, dass nicht lediglich Partikularinteress
Zustzlich sollte Bercksichtigung finden, dass ffentliche Behrden der Mitg
regionaler und lokaler Ebene sowie ihre Gremien, Zusammenschlsse und V
wie die EU-Institutionen Teil der Multi-Level-Governance in der Europischen
verpflichtet sind. Ihre Teilhabe am Legislativprozess und ihre Abstimmung mit
den EU-Institutionen hat daher eine andere Qualitt als das Lobbying durch
Toute
In
Entgegen rencontre
general thisin
der isavec
den des
butEquality
true,Medien of access;Othe
transparency
teilweise in lobbying
verbreiteten Les
is rgles
more
private
Ansicht,oder doivent
than
dass just tre clThey
the lobby
wirtschaftliche are relatively
register.
Akteure. tran
Sie unterliegen auch selbst
No
All lobbying!
EU decision-makers Other
should (please
be banned
Lobbying/Interessenvertretung per se problematisch elaborate
from No lobbying.....since
meeting
Meetings withwith
unregistered
big
Antikorruptionsregelungen it
business c They are
lobbyists
lobbies
sei, ist die Wichtigkeit (z. B. 42 BeamtenStG,not
and transparent
shouldshould
be limited
be obliged
in3 number
to publish
Abs. and online
2 TVD). better
Der lis
ba
Meetings with bigdass
hervorzuheben, businessIntegrity;Other
lobbies
Expertise auf should
(please
direktem beWege
limited
Tougher
anindie
number
rules
Verhaltenskodex should
and better
Entscheidungstrger
der notNo
EU only
balanced
opinion
applywith
entspricht for lobbyists
ohnehininteractionsbut with
alsoother
den ethischen the institutions.
stakeholders
Anforderungen Stri
ani
weitergegeben wird, um Integrity;Equality
eine hinreichendeofFaktenbasis
ac ffentlichen zu schaffen.
Dienst. They are relatively tran
Wir stimmen insoweit zu,Integrity;Equality of acc Wir verstehen gleichbereThey are relatively tran
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;Other (please Eine transparente VerwaThey are relatively tran
Le lobbying est par esseIntegrity et les conflits d'intrt They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Grundstzlich wird Tran Integrity;Equality of access;Other (please elabo They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access Die Expertise lokaler undThey regionaler Gebietskrperschaften
are relatively transparent und ihrer Verbn
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
There
Lobbying should
is anbeessential
no meetin Other
part of(please
the democratic Die
elaborateprocess.
Sincederzeit
Meetings geltenden
with
communication Regeln
big busineThey
Organisations such
is theas unterscheiden
are
essence notof
interest goodaber
transparent
groups, zwischen
policy making,zwei grundstzlico
the introduction
representative bodies, industry, NGOs, charities
Integrity;Equality of access and third party professional lobbyists all provide
They are relatively transparent
necessary input and fromfeedback through communication Die Expertise
In orderof their lokalerand
to maintain
views undconcerns
these regionaler
information Gebietskrperschaften undofficials
ihrer Verbn
I separate advocacy Integrity;Equality of access They are to government.
channels
relatively between public
transparent and i
This interaction is
Transparenter Lobbyismu a welcome and necessary element
Integrity;Equality of ac Treffen of policy development.
mit groen Wirts Following
No opinion the commencement of the Regulation o
continue to actively facilitate and encourage suchDie By derzeit
doing,geltenden
communications
so the intention
to the Regeln is tounterscheiden
greatest normalise
extent possible.
thoseaber zwischen zwei and
communications grundstzlic
let every
Interessenvertretung ist Integrity;Equality of acc Es geht auch darum, dieThey are relatively tran
Oberste
The Act doesPrioritt
not sollte Integrity;Equality
aim to prevent of acc The
or inhibit lobbying activity.
moveIts to objective
a more open is They
toand
make are relatively
transparent
the process tran
approach to consultation on public
Equality of access
more transparent while supporting the interaction of public bodies with all stakeholder They are relatively transparent
Oberste Prioritt sollt
organisations. Integrity Eineextent
The transparente
of lobbyingVerwaThey
activity areis a relatively
good measure tran of an engaged citizenry but
Integrity;Equality of ac They are highly transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
We fully support ethical Integrity;Equality of access Treffen mit Lobbyisten groer They Firmen
are relatively
solltren tran
in der Zahl begrenzt sein und in
Financer un budget plaidIntegrity;Equality of acc Compenser l'ingalit paThey are not transparent
Strengere Regeln sollten nicht nur fr Lobbyisten gelten, sondern auch fr di
Generell sehe ich das soOther (please elaborate Die Expertise lokaler undNo opinion Gebietskrperschaften und ihrer Verbn
regionaler
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity Die derzeit geltenden Regeln They unterscheiden
are relatively tran aber zwischen zwei grundstzlic
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Alle Treffen von EU-Ver Integrity;Other (please Bei professionelle Lobb They are not transparent
Allen EU-Entscheidungstr Other (please elaborate Treffen mit groen Wirts No opinion
Integrity;Equality of ac ben Ich gehekommunikation
davon aus, dass omThey dmit "Integritt"
are relatively dietransparent
mglichst vollstndige bereins
Hier muss durchgehend I1ntegrity;Equality of acc Wenn Other. mit "gleichberichtigtem They Zugang"
are not transparent
gemeint ist, dass jeder Interessierte, o
Equality of access
In general this is true, but transparency in lobbying is more than just the lobby register. They are relatively transparent
Der
All EUAussage wird insofern
decision-makers zugestimmt,
Equality
should ofbannedalsfrom
access Lobbying ethischen undbusiness
transparenten
They areRegeln
relatively unterworfen
transparent inwerden sollte. Jedoch bai
Transparency is more than just be
a lobbying meeting
Meetings
register. withwith
unregistered
big lobbyists
lobbies and
shouldshould
be limited
be obliged number
to publish
and online
better lis
Meetings with big business Other
lobbies
(please
should
elaborate
be limited
Tougher
Die Expertise lokaler und regionaler Gebietskrperschaften und ihrer Verbni
in number
rules should
and better
not Noonly
balanced
opinion
apply with
for lobbyists
interactionsbut with
also other
the institutions.
stakeholders Stri
Wie schon eine Studie der Bundesarbeitskammer (BAK) aus dem Jahr 2012 gezeigt hat, sind ArbeitnehmerInnen in Brssel st
Oberste
All Prioritt sollte Integrity
EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting Die derzeit
Meetings with geltenden
with
unregistered
bigDas Regeln
business They unterscheiden
are relatively
lobbyists
lobbies and
shouldshouldtran
be aber zwischen
limited
be obliged
in ein
numberzwei
tohnlich
publishgrundstzlic
and online
better lis
ba
https://media.arbeiterkammer.at/wien/MWUG_Ausgabe_113.pdf). EU-Transparenzregister zeichnet dramatisc
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Meetings
Schon seitwith big business
Jahren Other
setzt sich lobbies
die(please
BAK should
elaborate
gegen bedie
limited
Tougher
in number
Dominanz
Es sollte rules
fr
von should
and better
jede/n
WirtschaftnotTheyonly
balanced
Interessierte/n
und are
apply not
Finanzen with
fortransparent
lobbyists
interactions
ersichtlich
in sein,but
Europa mitwith
ein also
und other
the
welchen institutions.
stakeholders
ist bestrebt,
LobbyistInnenStri
dass ai
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Ein aufflliges oder grundlegendes Problem im Verhltnis zwischen europis
Die BAK ist seit 2010 Mitglied Integrity;Equality
bei ALTER-EU of ac
(Alliance
Wie bereits
for Lobbying
Die Expertise in lokaler
der vorhergehenden
and undTransparency
No opinionFrage
regionaler and erwhnt,
Ethics Regulation)
Gebietskrperschaftenergeben und jngste
undihrer
untersttzt
Auswertu
Verbn
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity;Equality
Die Bayerische Staatsregierung stimmt dieser Aussage of acc Die derzeit
Aus diesem geltenden
voll zu. Grunde Regeln
Die BeteiligungThey
ist es aberder unterscheiden
are relatively
auch
relevanten tran
aber
entscheidend, zwischen
Akteuredass zwei
ermglicht
eine klare grundstzlic
es, Untersch
erfolgrei
Other (please elaborate They are relatively tran
Transparente Lobbyarbeit Integrity;Equality of ac Die Anzahl der Treffen miThey are not transparent
Integrity Die Expertise lokaler undThey are highly
regionaler transparent
Gebietskrperschaften und ihrer Verbn
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity Die derzeit geltenden Regeln They unterscheiden
are relatively tran aber zwischen zwei grundstzlic
Integrity;Equality of ac Responsibility & AccountThey are relatively tran
Transparenz in der Lobby Integrity They are relatively tran
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac PLURALIDAD They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access Of course it is also a ma They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are
Es muss sichergestellt werden, relatively
dass transparentInteressen gleichberec
unterschiedliche
Transparente LobbyarbeiIntegrity;Equality of ac Die Kommunalbehrden They sind dem
are relatively
Gemeinwohltran verpflichtet und unterliegen ih
Lobbyists can provide exIntegrity;Equality of acc Equality of access includThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Lobbying is essential to Integrity;Equality of ac It is right the EU Instit They are relatively tran
The more arguments andIntegrity They are relatively tran
n Romnia nu exist o LIntegrity;Equality of acc Profesionalism atestat iThey are relatively tran
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Other (please Responsability They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of acc The should be more public They are relatively tran
Es geht darum, FehlentwIntegrity;Equality of ac Entscheidungen drfen nThey are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
we fully agree and joine Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
The EU should commit an Integrity;Equality of acc There should be some audi They are relatively tran
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Transparency register heEquality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of ac spjno z reguami dia They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac there has to be no disc They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Presumo che al fine di ri Integrity;Equality of ac L'integrit non pu esserThey are relatively tran
Other (please elaborate Exclure de la liste des They are relatively transparent
fra gli Enti da consultar Integrity;Equality of ac onest, legalit, corrett They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality
Der er et misfohold imellem de lobbyer som of reprsenter
access store firmaer, og They
de somarereprsenterer
relatively transparent
befolkningen interesser. De s
Integrity
Lobbyerne skal vre ligeligt fordelt, s den svage gruppe(de borgere somThey skal are
leverelatively transparent fr en meget strre s
under afgrelserne)
Der er et stort misfohold Equality
i hvor parlementsmedlemmerne
of access S lnge frde
deres
nationale
oplysninger,
meThey are
og hvilket
not transparent
pres(hvis i ikke-s gr vi...) de bliver
No opinion No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Es kann nicht angehen, Integrity;Equality of ac Normalbrger Zugang zuThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Just They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
proper information aboutIntegrity They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
It would be ideal to hav Integrity;Equality of ac Citizens should have equa They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access
Transparente Lobbyarbeit wirkt sich auf Politikentwicklung
Integritt, nur dann positivThey
gleichberechtigteraus,are
und relatively
wenn bei dertransparent
uneingeschrnkter
Bewertung
Zugang
der Beitrge
zu Informationen
nicht die
No opinion They are relatively tran
VORSCHLAG: Integrity;Equality of ac Los valores de responsabilidad,
VORSCHLAG: They aretransparencia,
highly transparent
sostenibilidad, compromiso,
Alle Beitrge von Lobbyisten,
Integrity;Equality
die in Konsultationen
of acc Informationen
zu laufendenmitRechtssetzungsverfahren
Geheimhaltungsklassen
They are relativelyeingehen,
zu
tran
versehen
sollten
und nach
Lobbyisten
EU-Postein
zur G
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Lobbying ALWAYS favours Integrity;Equality of acc How can it possibly be They are not transparent
Fr was brauchen wir be Other (please elaborate Lobbyisten mssen einfaThey are not transparent
The question is ambiguoOther (please elaborate Politicians hold public p They are relatively tran
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc Large corporations seemThey t are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
This should not only appIntegrity;Equality of ac morality and openness inThey are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Other (please Those lobbying should bThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
No opinion No opinion
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Non corporate lobbying m Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Certaines organisations Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
To achieve a sound framework for highly
relations with lobbyists, the following would
Integrity;Equality of access They are transparent
Integrity;Equality of access 1) Stopping the privileged They
accessare by relatively
business transparent
interests: Lobbyists representi
Integrity 2) Stopping lobbying on behalf They are highlyindustries:
of 'toxic' transparent Industries that are in clear
Integrity;Equality of access 3) Ethics rules for those in They
the are not transparent
institutions: at all not just focus on lob
Rules should
We believe that lobbyingOther (please elaborate They are relatively tran
Integrity Die Expertise lokaler undThey are highly
regionaler transparent
Gebietskrperschaften und ihrer Verbn
Oberste Prioritt sollte Equality of access Die derzeit geltenden Regeln They unterscheiden
are relatively tran aber zwischen zwei grundstzlic
Integrity;Other (please Wahrung der Unabhngike They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac respect, mutual recognit They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Restarting the Future believes that achieving appropriate lobbying regulation
But the Commission serviIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity Meetings
A mandatory withregister withThey
big business are relatively
lobbies
appropriate should
sanctionstran
be limited
would in ensure
numberthat andlobbyists
better bap
It is absolutely essential Other (please elaborate Tougher rules should notThey only areapply notfortransparent
lobbyists but also the institutions. Stri
Integrity;Equality of access A recent conflict of interest Theyscandal in Italy involving
are relatively tran the Italian Minister of Eco
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
In general, ethical and transparent
Equality oflobbying
access helpsTo policy
achieve
development
a sound framework
andThey
it is important
arefor relatively
relations
to make with sure
lobbyists,
transparent that thetheprocesses
following would to se
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Transparent lobbying is about more than just the Stopping EU's lobby the
transparency
privileged access
register. byThe
business
Commissioninterests: should
Lobbyists
extend representing
the wider t
Equality of access No opinion
CEO
In derconsiders
Gesellschaftthat,wir
in general, ethical and
Integrity;Equality oftransparent
acc Stopping lobbyingder
Die Akzeptanz hasEurop
the potential
Theyofare torelatively
help policy trandevelopment and it is importan
Meanwhile, the European Ombudsman has seriously criticised
lobbying
the Commission
on behalf for
toxicitsindustries:
poor implementation
An ethical approach
of the World to lobbyin
Health
The registry provides oneIntegrity;Equality of acc Ethics are really very i They are highly transpar
The Commission's November 2014 transparency There reforms areapply
various
onlyadditional
to the topaspects
250 or so of ethical
most senior lobbying.
officials in the Commissio
However, it should be pointed Integrity;Equality
out that lobbying
of ac which
In addition,
is transparent
we thinkisstrong
notNoalways
lobbying
opinion ethical.
regulation
Lobbyists would
may provide
make a fullclear
disclosures
and una
Stopping the privileged access by business interests: Lobbyists representing
IThethink it is very valuab Integrity;Equality of access
tobacco industry is a sector that should be treated Prioritising
with extreme
the public They
caution.
interest: Theare
Public relatively
EU institutions transparent
and privatemust (business)
implement interests
the World
very ofte
He
Integrity;Equality of access Preventing unscrupulousThey are relatively
lobbying: Lobbyingtran in the context of a conflict of inte
Transparency is only oneIntegrity;Equality
element, albeit an of essential
accessSeverely
one, restricting
of ethical lobbying.Theyon
lobbying are
But relatively
behalf
ethical transparent
oflobbying
'toxic' industries:
goes far beyond
The WHOs transparen
FCTC
Other (please elaborate Ethics rules for those in the No institutions:
opinion It is not just about rules for lobbyists,
It depends primarily on Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Direi che addirittura neEquality of access Ritengo inoltre che si d They are highly transpar
Yes. But there should b Integrity;Equality of ac To open the possibility f They are not transparent at all
In general Integrity;Equality
this is true,lobiranje
but transparency of access theThey are relatively transparent
Etino in transparentno je gotovoinpomemben
lobbying Meetings
Nujno isdejavnik
more
je trebawith
than
pribig
just business
uravnoteiti
pripravi lobby lobbies
zakonodaje.
lobiranje.register.should
Trenutno
Bistveno be limited
levji
pa dele
je, dainsestankov
number
je lobiranje and better
odpade
**tudi vn
All EU decision-makers Integrity;Equality
should be banned of access
from meeting
Tougherwithrulesunregistered
should not They areapply
lobbyists
only relatively
and tran bebut
for should
lobbyists obliged
also theto publish
institutions.
onlineS
Meetings
Trenutno se with bigobusiness
pravila Otherlobbies
(pleaseshould
transparentnosti elaborate
nanaajo be limited
le
Pomemben in number
na zelo ozek deland
korak better
No opinion
kuradnikov
etinemu balanced
EU,
lobiranju with
priblinobi bil,interactions
250daoseb. Tawith
se dosledno other
seznam uvede stakeholder
je potrebno
konvenci
Integrity They are relatively transparent
It is important
Poleg to check Integrity;Other
(ne)transparentnosti (please
je problem tudi, da so Lobbyists
doloenejeshould
Dodatno skupine
potrebnoprovide
lobistovThey
uvesti are notintransparent
tevilno
regulativo, po
finanno
kateri lani
velikoevropskih
monejeinstitucij
od drugih (tudi
sk
Equality of access;Othe They are relatively tran
fucking jewish kibbutz !!!Other (please elaborate bullshit !!! They are not transparent
Commission official meets an unregistered lobbyist balance
and sointhat stakeholder
Partikularinteressen all lobby meetings
representation.
derjenigen heldZuge
zum are
Thekommen,
most effective, and ethical, way to
recorded online. This would ensure a further 30,000 aufbringen
privileged knnen.
die or moreaccess
besonders individuals
viele to finanzielle
theareCommission
coveredRessourcen by businessfr die interests would be clear lim
Interessenvertretung
including those with high interactions with lobbyists Zustzlich
meetings
and those sollte
and with
otherBercksichtigung
serious
kinds input
of finden,
interactions
into the dass
with bigffentliche
business Behrden
lobbyists, deras to
so
aufbringen knnen.
policy drafting process. Mitgliedstaaten
with access by auf nationaler,
other stakeholders, including civil society organisations.
Zustzlich sollte Bercksichtigung finden, dass ffentliche Behrden der
Meanwhile, the European Ombudsman has seriously regionaler
Stopping
criticised undthe
lobbying lokaler Ebeneofsowie
Commission
on behalf for itsihre
'toxic' poor Gremien,
industries: AnZusammenschlsse
ethical to und V
Mitgliedstaaten auf nationaler, regionaler und lokaler Ebeneapproach
sowie ihre lobby
Grem
implementation of the World Health Organisation's wie die
ensure
FrameworkEU-Institutionen
that the Convention
Worldhat Healthon Tobacco
Organisation's Framework Convention
den EU-Institutionen
Wichtig ist u. a. die Sicherstellung,daher einedass anderenicht Qualitt
lediglich Lobbyingondurch
alsPartikularinteressen
das Tobac
d
Control and the Commission should immediately fully Teil der
publish Multi-Level-Governance
implemented,
details of allasmeetings
recently within der Europischen
demanded by the European UnionOmbudsman,
und dem Gemein and
private
die oder
besonders wirtschaftliche
viele finanzielle Akteure.
RessourcenSie unterliegen
fr die auch selbst
Interessenvertretung aufbr
tobacco lobbyists online.Equality of access verpflichtet
with the tobacco sind. Ihre Teilhabe
industry are am Legislativprozess
really kept to an absolute und ihre Abstimmung mit
Antikorruptionsregelungen
Zustzlich sollte Bercksichtigung No opinion
(z. B. finden,
42 BeamtenStG,
dass 3minimum
ffentliche Abs. as is require
2 TVD).
Behrden Der
However, it should be pointed out that lobbying den EU-Institutionen
which
regulation.
is transparent is hat
not daher
always eine andere
ethical. Qualitt als das Lobbyingder Mitg
durch
Entgegen der in den MedIntegrity;Equality of ac regionaler Verhaltenskodex und der EU
lokaler They
entspricht
Ebene are relatively
sowie ohnehin
ihre tran
den ethischen
Gremien, Anforderungen
Zusammenschlsse undan V
Entgegen
Lobbyists mayder inmake
den Medien teilweiseaccording
full disclosures verbreiteten
toprivate
Ansicht,
Ethics
the oder
rules,
rules dass
but wirtschaftliche
forif those theAkteure.
certainininterests institutions: Sie Itunterliegen auch selbst
is not just about rules for lobbyists,
Transparenz in der Lobby
Lobbying/Interessenvertretung I ntegrity;Equality
perand of ac
se ifproblematischTeil der Multi-Level-Governance
Antikorruptionsregelungen
sei, ist They are inrelatively
der Europischen
tran Union und dem Gemein
outnumber
In general, and outspend
ethical andbegr others,
transparent lobbyingthey helps
receive
need
To greater
policy
achieve be die
todevelopment
or
far Wichtigkeit
privileged
tougher
a sound framework
and it (z.
codes
access B.for
of to relations
42 BeamtenStG,
conduct
is important toand make rules
with forthat
sure 3 Abs.
the2processes
individuals
lobbyists, the TVD).
with the
following Der
toinst
wouldse
Der Deutsche
hervorzuheben,
decision-makers, Verein
dass
and Integrity;Equality
Expertise
then manageauf direktem
to of access
secure Wege Verhaltenskodex
an
policies
those die
or
who Entscheidungstrger
ruleshave which der
recentlyEU
are They
entspricht
contrary
left. are
Such torelatively
ohnehin
the
rules transparent
would,den ethischen
for example, Anforderungen
prevent MEPs anh
A transparent and open dialogue between the EU institutions and all relevant stakeholders is vital for high quality EU policy-ma
weitergegeben
public interest, wird,
then um Integrity;Equality
eine
arguably hinreichende
this is not ofFaktenbasis
access
ethical ffentlichen
lobbying
side zu
jobs
and schaffen.
and/
it Dienst.
will
or not
blockhelptheThey
the are relatively
revolving
quality and
door tran
between the EU institutions and the
Transparent lobbying is about more than just the Stopping EU's lobby the transparency
privileged access register. byThebusiness
Commission interests: should
Lobbyists
extend representing
the wider t
BUSINESSEUROPE Integrity;Equality
legitimacy of policy development.
itself lists its Lobbying
meetings ofis
acnotleaders
with lobby
ethically
The EU institutionsThey
industry.
ofneutral.
representativeness, in its are
relevance weeklyrelatively
andNewsletter tran Headlines,
expertise of the stakeholders
and letters,concern
pos
Other (please
Meanwhile, the European Ombudsman has seriously elaborate Stopping
criticised
lobbyingthe Commission They
on behalf of for are relatively
'toxic'
its poor
industries:tran
implementation
An ethical of approach
the World to Health
lobby
BUSINESSEUROPE fullyIntegrity;Othersupported the(please aims of the
BUSINESSEUROPE
European Commission willThey
continue
to increase
are relatively
providing
transparency
tran
constructive
sincesupport
their conception
and therefo 10
However, it should be pointed Other out(please
that lobbying
elaboratewhich
Ethics is rules
transparent
for those is not
in the
They
always
institutions:
areethical.
not transparent
ItLobbyists
is not justmay aboutmake
rulesfullfordisclosures
lobbyists,
various opinions should Equality of access integrity cannot be be e They are relatively tran
El proceso debera ser cNo opinion They are not transparent
El proceso debera ser cNo opinion Die Regulierung der Interessenvertretung They are not transparent gegenber den EU-Institutionen so
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Die deutsche Wirtschaft Integrity;Other (please Der BDI und die BDA sprechen They are sich
relatively
selbstverstndlich
tran dafr aus, dass - basi
El proceso debera ser cNo opinion They are not transparent
The dominance of the priIntegrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
El proceso debera ser cNo opinion They are not transparent
El proceso debera ser cNo opinion They are not transparent
El proceso debera ser cNo opinion They are not transparent
While we fully agree wit Equality of access equality of access but They are not transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
State of Law Other (please elaborate Minimum level of coruptioThey are relatively transparent
Dans le mesure d'un quiEquality of access;Othe l'quilibre des moyens etThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of acc Equality of information They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity Make sure that the stakeThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Um ein effektiven und soliden Rahmenhighlyfr Lobbying zu errichten, ist auch folg
Integrity;Equality of access They are transparent
1. Privilegierter Zugang fr Wirtschaftsinteressen muss gestoppt werden. D
Integrity;Equality of access 2. Lobbying fr gemeinwohlschdliche They are relatively tran
Interessen (toxic Lobbying) muss g
A transparent lobbying m Equality of
1. Grundstzlich kann ethisches und transparentesaccess;Othe Public has
3. Ethisches to be informe
Lobbying Politikentwicklung No opinion
Lobbying verlangtpositiv auch nach frdern. ethischen Regeln fr die Instituti
2. Zu beachten ist aber, Integrity;Equality
dass transparentes of access
Lobbying
4. Insgesamt
mehr verlangt drfenals sichThey
selbst are
solche relatively
durch
weiteren transparent
ein anspruchsvolles
Vorgaben neben Lobbyregister
den Transparen sich
3. Auerdem ist zu beachten, Integrity;Equality
dasstransparentes
of ac Lobbying nicht automatisch No opinionethisches Lobbying bedeutet. Auch wenn Lobb
Um ein effektiven und soliden Rahmen fr Lobbying zu errichten, ist auch folg
Integrity They are relatively tran
1. Privilegierter Zugang fr Wirtschaftsinteressen muss gestoppt werden. D
1. Grundstzlich kann Integrity;Equality of access
ethisches und transparentes 2. Lobbying fr PolitikentwicklungThey arepositiv
gemeinwohlschdliche not transparent
frdern.
Interessen (toxic Lobbying) muss g
Integrity;Equality
2. Zu beachten ist aber, dass transparentes Lobbying of access3. Ethisches
mehr verlangt Lobbying They
als verlangt are
selbst durch relatively
auch ein
nach transparent
anspruchsvolles
ethischen Regeln Lobbyregister
fr die Instituti
sich
3. Auerdem ist zu beachten, Integrity;Equality of access
dass transparentes 4. Lobbying
Insgesamt nichtdrfen They
automatisch
sich are
solche relatively
ethisches
weiteren transparent
Lobbying
Vorgaben bedeutet.
neben den AuchTransparen
wenn Lob
Transparenz in der Lobbyarbeit Integrity;Equality
ist sehr zuofbefrworten.
ac No opinion
Die politische Mitgestaltung Integrity
von Kommunen und ihren Verbnden ist jedoch They vonare derrelatively
Lobbyarbeit tran politischer, wirtschaftlicher, s
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are not transparent
Those being lobbied need Integrity;Equality of acc A sound framework would They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are highly transparent
Il est certain que l'exp Integrity;Other (please L'expression d'une posit They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access No opinion
Lobbyarbeit ist akzeptabEquality of access;Othe Verhinderung und TranspThey are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Equality of access for all points of view is vital to ensure that public interests a
Integrity;Equality of access
Mandatory requirements for improved ethical andThe transparent
most effective
lobbying toThey
waywould stop are
not relatively
access
only to EUtran
inform the
institutions
development
by business
of balanced
interests
pol
Integrity;Equality of acc The
Es istpossibility given
sicherzustellen, t dassThey
In particular, the European Ombudsman has highlighted the lack of transparency of the Commission are
nicht relatively
lediglich tran
Partikularinteressen derjenigen
in their meetings ber
with tob
The Deutsche Post DHL Integrity;Equality
Gr of ac besonders
The
This serves to illustrate how rules are currently poorly
Other: regulationviele
implemented, offinanzielle
Compliance evenlobbyi TheyRessourcen
are
with International
those that are relatively fr
agreement die
tranInteressenvertretung
well defined (FCTC
by the
artUN aufbringe
5.3)Framework Co
EPHA responded to the GreenIntegrity;Equality
Paper on aofEuropean
ac The Transparency Initiative RegisterThey in
should
2006,
are not ensure
thetransparent
Civil
theSociety
properContact
implementation
Group (CSCG)
of inter
Integrity Zustzlich sollte Bercksichtigung They are highly finden,transparent
dass ffentliche Behrden der Mitg
regionaler und lokaler Ebene Theysowie ihre Gremien, Zusammenschlsse und V
Integrity;Equality of access are relatively transparent
Es sollte strengstens darauf geachtet werden, dass Teiljegliche
der Multi-Level-Governance
Einflussnahme von Organisationenin der Europischen und Personen,
Union und diedem
Einzelinter
Gemein
Transparenz in dem SinnEquality of access NIcht nuram
Die Expertise
Teilhabe Industrie,
lokaleraucundThey
Legislativprozess are
undnot
regionaler transparent at all
Gebietskrperschaften
ihre Abstimmung mit denund ihrer Verbn
EU-Institutionen
Oberste Prioritt sollte
Die kommunalen Integrity;Equalityund
Gebietskrperschaften of acc
ihreDie
als derzeit
Expertise
Verbnde
das geltenden
Lobbying lokaler
setzen durch Regeln
sichund
frThey unterscheiden
are
regionaler
private relatively tran
aber zwischen
Gebietskrperschaften
Gemeinwohlinteressen
oder wirtschaftliche Akteure. zwei
ein. und grundstzlic
ihrer Verbna
Sie unterliegen
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity;Equality of acc Die derzeit geltenden
Bei ihren Vertretern handelt es sich um direkt undAntikorruptionsregelungen Regeln
demokratisch gewhlte BrgermeisterThey unterscheiden
are highly
(z. B. 71 Abs. transpar
aber
und1Landrte,zwischen
BBG, 3 welche zwei
aufgrundstzlic
Abs. 2 TVD).nationaler
Der Veru
Interessenvertretungen. Integrity;Equality
Die Stadt Pforzheimof ac
erwartet,
ohnehin
Die dassden
Expertise dieethischen
Europische
lokaler Anforderungen
und They Kommission
are relatively
regionaler andiesem
den
tranffentlichen
deutlichenDienst.
Gebietskrperschaften Unterschied Rech
und ihrer Verbn
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity;Equality of acc Die derzeit geltenden Regeln They unterscheiden
are relatively tran aber zwischen zwei grundstzlic
Diese og Art von Lobbyi Integrity Eine Verwaltung ist tra They are relatively tran
Other (please elaborate Bercksichtigung der Rep They are highly transparent
*Ethical and transparent lobbying helps policy development.
AppropriateItlobbyingis important
regulation
to make is also
sure about
that the being
processes
balanced.
to secure ethical a
Oberste Prioritt sollt Integrity;No opinion Eine transparente VerwaThey
It is crucial to allow equal access areforrelatively tran
all stakholders, including trade unions.
* Transparent lobbying isEquality of access
about more than just theFor
EU's thelobby
ETUC, collectiveThey
transparency are relatively
bargaining
register. and social transparent
dialogue need to be excluded
Integrity;Equality of acc InLobbying
many legal regulation
ordersisbutalThey
also at are relatively tran
international and European level, trade union
* It should be pointed outIntegrity;Equality
that lobbying which
of acc
is transparent
Die Expertise is not always
lokaler undethical.
They are relatively
regionaler tran
Gebietskrperschaften und ihrer Verbn
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity;Equality of acc Die derzeit geltenden Regeln
They unterscheiden
are relatively
Un dialogue ouvert et transparent entre les institutions de l'UE et toutes les parties prenantes est essentiel pour une tran
aber zwischen zwei grundstzlic
politique U
No opinion
Le MEDEF a toujours promu l'inscription au registre De de faontransparence
globale, la auprs No opinion
reprsentativit,
de ses fdrations
la pertinence membres.
et l'expertise des parties p
Le MEDEF soutient pleinement
Integrity;Equality
les objectifs
of de
ac laEnCommission
tant que partie pourprenante,
accrotre
Theyla leare
transparence.
MEDEFrelativelypoursuivra
tran son action constructive en
Maintaining qualified lo Equality of access Same
Die as above.
Expertise Theund
lokaler sheeThey are notGebietskrperschaften
regionaler transparent und ihrer Verbn
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity;Equality of acc Die derzeit geltenden Regeln They unterscheiden
are relatively tran aber zwischen zwei grundstzlic
Tout dpend de la dfini Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
La complexit des normes Integrity Laccs doit tre libre, They are highly transparent
There is often an import Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transpar
Integrity;Equality of access
Grundstzlich schafft Transparenz im Bereich der Interessenvertretung mehr They are relatively
Vertrauen transparent
und Rckhalt in die Politik, indem sie M
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Dem Austausch mit Interessenvertretern,
Integrity;Equality NGOs
of acc und
Bereitsanderen
jetzt haben
Akteuren man der They
Zivilgesellschaft
are relativelykommt tran eine erhebliche Bedeutung
No opinion They are
Selbstverstndlich befrwortet Daimler grundstzlichrelatively transparent den Zugang zu politisch
Integrity;Equality of access They are not
Darber hinaus sollten sich politische Entscheidungstrger transparent at all ffentlich vermeh
Integrity;Equality of accessEin vereinfachter ZugangThey are not transparent
der akkreditierten at all
Interessenvertreter in das Europ
Daimler macht sich fr Integrity;Other (please They are relatively tran
Sofern politische Entsch Integrity;Equality of ac Vorrangiger Blick fr di They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
OCCORRE, A MIO PAREIntegrity They are not transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
lobbying (contact with E Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac publication of and open They are relatively tran
Dipende da cosa si intenIntegrity;Equality of acc Anche se la parit di ac They are relatively tran
Integrity has a particular relevance in this context, especially with regard to pr
Integrity;Equality of acc Transparency and intercoThey are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of accessThe Registers role in providing They are relatively
clearly transparent
readable information on EU funding re
Integrity;Equality of ac All organisations should They are relatively tran
As the representation of Integrity;Other (please The principle of proportionality, They are as relatively
enshrinedtran in Article 5 of the Treaty on Euro
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
Integrity They are relatively transparent
- clear expectations of impartiality and fidelity to public interest;
enhance the quality of decision-making by providing should
- practical channels
be guidance
published;
for the on input how of to
valuable
deal with expertise.
gifts and hospitality,
- guidance on handling official information, and communication with third part
Lobbyists come in many forms as diverse as environmental -- makinga robustopen NGOs
system all or calls
of multinational
for applications
conflicts companies.
of interest tomanagement,
sit on advisory/expert groups and in
- periodic disclosure of interests, rules regarding incompatibility of simultaneo
Expertise is provided to policy makers on a daily basis criteria
- a rule bytotoprofessional
ensure
only meet a balanceconsultancies,
registered of different
lobbyists, lawinterests.
firms,
-Kommunale
control of the revolvingsind
Verbnde doors between Partner,
verlssliche the public and the Kommunalpolitiker
gewhlte private sectors, an
industry
Die Arbeit associations,
der Gemeinden labour unions, NGOs,
Integrity;Equality thinkReasoning
of acc tanks,
-Kommunen
sanctions religious
forsind communities
non-compliance They and
im Transparenzregister embassies.
are relatively demnach
transparent gleich zu behandeln wie d
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
We see, however, that the misbehaviour of a few Regulation is sufficient
Equality istoonly
of access discredit
one
can element
an strengthened
be entiretoprofession.
ensureby: fairThe lobbying. Enforcement of any re
Wir befrworten die Tra Integrity;Equality of access Die Expertise lokaler undThey regionalerare relatively tran
Gebietskrperschaften und ihrer Verbn
- approving legal requirements that allow citizens, interest groups and corpor
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity;Equality
risk of undue influence and corruption in the political of acc Die
broader derzeit
process geltenden
willingness
seriously Regeln
They unterscheiden
are relatively tran
aber zwischen zwei grundstzlic
- introducing
Transparency a legal by undermines
all actors involved
requirement on the functioning
public tobodies
act ethically,
of
to publish is crucial
the resultsto creating
of con
BASF is committed to traIntegrity;Equality of acc At -Oxfam BASF
making we
open consider
all calls both
for They are
applications relatively to sit tran
on advisory/expert groups anda in
believes that full lobbying transparency is the foundation on which m
a democracy. There is a Integrity;Equality
significant public of interest
access ethical
in ensuring
Transparency and fair the lobbying
transparency
International in
They public and
aredecision-making.
believes integrity
that fullof
relatively transparent
lobbying transparency is the foun
Une
As a transparence
Interestmember of EUtotale
representation Equality
and
Transparency lobbying ofRegister
access
is a vital partA
since Chaque
Reasoning
ofmandatory
2008, anyDI
continually partie
democracy
is aregisterdoit pouvo
coherent
strong closely
for They related
European
supporter
and open are arelatively
to universal
lobbyists
ofdialoguetransparent transparent
must
between values
and be such
set up
stakeholders
open asto freedom
dialogue shed
and theofEuro
light
between spe
on Ec
lobbying, as well as diversity of participation accessand contribution
For this reason,
Regulation is toonly
public
Transparency
one decision-making.
element International
to ensure fairadvocates
lobbying. for a three tierofsystem
Enforcement any re
Transparency in lobbyingIntegrity;Equality
strengthens the of legitimacy Recommendations
To ensure
of stakeholders,
a transparent while They
and are
contributing
high relatively
quality
The IIA on the Transparency Register and the 2015 Guidelines assume that t to transparent
better
policy-makinggovernance processand in
public
EU legisla
confid
Lobbyists come in many Integrity;Other forms as diverse as environmental
(please To
Equalitycomplementof NGOs
access the orintegrity
multinational
They are companies.
system and thetran
relatively Expertise
existing Code is provided
of Conduct to policy
for inte
Any attempt to regulate lobbying must address the of:
For
-
Oxfam broader
this
clear issue Transparency
reason,
expectations
is convinced of equality
of
that ofmost
impartiality
the opportunities
International
and
effective, fidelity of
advocates
and to public
ethical, for a
interest;
way three
to stoptier system
privileged
To raise awareness of t Equality
COSLA as the national association of Scottish Local of access To share
TheAuthorities, and
new rules were participate
a public They
originally
body fully are
geared relatively
andtowards inseparablytran making ownedtransparent
by themany fundamen
undue
We see, however, that the misbehaviour of a few -Equality 1. ispractical
a
sufficient
coreofofguidancestrong
to discredit
access regulations,
canon be an strengthened
how entire
to are
dealprofession.
with by: The
and risk
giftstransparent of undue influence and
hospitality,
access, structural imbalances Integrity in resources and the 1. integrity
a core of in strong
interest regulations,They
representation. relatively
A first step to
Ignorance of that by the EU institutions supposes-Integrity: 2.
By an additional
aguidance
approving
breach
doing Asofon
this legal
aArticlelayer
handling
responsible
we have ofbeen
requirements
4 TEU Codes
official
company, ofLisbon
ofunfairly
the Conduct
information,
that allow
we for
andpublic
citizens,
support officials
communication
interest
ethical and
groups
behaviour withand
andthird
corporpart
integri
ilAny
lobbismo
attemptcomnque
to regulate togli Integrity
lobbying must address the They notpenalised
arecivil Treaty
transparent here
whichatandrequires
all our collective
the EU instituti
respon
-3.a broader
arobust
functional,
introducing issue
system strong
a legalofofequalitysphere
conflicts
requirement ofof of
opportunities
interest
on public society ofmonitoring.
management,
bodies access, structural
to publish imbalances
the results of con i
ensuring a level playing field Equalityin theof decision-making
access We
2. anstrongly
process
additional isagree layer that
transparency. achieving
offorCodes
They Lobbying, appropriate
ofrules
are Conduct
relatively and and
the
tran lobbying regulation is not just a
To be absolutely clear COSLA is however more than - periodic
making
Accountability:
It shouldhappy disclosure
open
bethat notedall
We calls
ourthat see of interests,
meetings applications
accountability
the Lobbyingwith EU(Scotland) asregarding
to sit
an on incompatibility
advisory/expert
indispensable
officials, MEPs, Act 2016 element
etc.introduces of
are publicly simultaneo
groups of a and
a mandacomp
known in
Fundierte
Efforts Informationen
to shed transparency Integrity;Other
on lobbying, (please
should In Gem
-take
athis into
rule Artikel
only 11
context,
to consideration EUV
Transparency
meet sol
theThey
registered are
challenges relatively
International
lobbyists, tran a clear
in determining
sees whose
priority interests
in the overhau
are rep
We agree
impact thatonethical
it has and
legislation transparent
and policies, lobbying
should helps
be 3. The
made
a policy
requirement
functional, development
transparent strongto be
so transparent
and
sphere
that is
society
ofnecessary
civil should
at society
large for
not
can a place
thriving
monitoring. an democracy.
unnecessary Public
burden off
Yes, wealready
believe thatstress
ethical Integrity;Equality
and of interest
acc -Recommendations
control of the revolving They
doors aare relatively
between the atran
public and the private sectors, toan
We are
However, we must formally registered
that thetransparent
in the
onus toCommittee
be transparent Equity
It isrepresentation
of ofshould
access:
unfortunate
the Regions that
not We
constitutes
as believe
this
solelyofficial
has that
and
come
lie with vitalin atorder
part
democratically
lobbyists. a time oftoThe achieve
dynamic
when better
EU
accountable
there
lobbying aredecision-making
transparency
strong
representative
community questions
is clearly prpo
Integrity;Equality of ac -To sanctions
complement
Lobbyists
for non-compliance
areofexpected
the integrity They system
topermits
declare are and thetran
relatively
their general
existing Code of Conduct for inte
information such
know who exercises influence and how. Indeed, transparency In this context, Transparency
lobbying International
any stakeholder sees to a in
clearinterest;
priority in as
theorganisa
overhau
Similarly, lobbyists subscribe Integrity;Equality of acc -Recognition
to a code of conduct clear
by expectations
appearing of on
thethe oftransparency
legiti impartiality
They are relatively and fidelity
register tran
and public
are therefore expected to be
Equality
- better of access can be strengthened by:
alsopractical
Integrity;Other guidance on how tobe deal with gifts and hospitality,
society to react to ongoing lobbying with(please their ownWe Transparency
efforts.
- approving
guidance
believe
Transparency
on legal
that
Register
requirements
handling
They
a register
also
to allow
official makesare
forhighly
must
that full
politicians
allow
information,
transpar
truly
structural inclusive
citizens,
and
and
transparency it should
interest groups
communication towith level the
monitor
and who
corpor
third part
p
In contrast, the transparency Otherregisters
(please elaborate
code of conduct does not hold the They unions areofficials
relatively ethical
tran behaviour to the same stand
Oxfam stronglyand
A transparent believes that interest
open dialogue between the EU- institutions
representation introducing
a robust
and lobbying system a legal
and is
alloftherequirement
conflicts
lifeblood
relevant ofon
of interest
stakeholders any public isbodies
democratic
management,
vital for to publish
system
high and thetherefore
quality results
EU ofvital
policy-ma con
aware that the public is watching, Integrity;Equality
and allows of acc
citizens making.
- making to hold
control open
of decision-makers
the all calls forThey
revolving toareaccount.
applications
doors relatively
between tothesittranon advisory/expert
public and the private groups
sectors and in
In
We a fully
democracy,
Preliminary support
remark:the aimsIntegrity;Equality
principle
the Friends of of ofthe
the accountability
European ofCommission
Earth Europe
access
holds
is - periodic
a that togovernment
steering disclosure
increasegroup transparency
member
They are
officialswhether
of interests, from
of ALTER-EU
notits
rules transparent
regarding
elected
conception at10
(www.alter-eu.org)
all yearsby
or incompatibility
appointed those
ago.
and ofco-develope
simultaneo
The whosame hav
Integrity;Equality of access Reasoning
- a rule to only meet They
registered are not
lobbyists, transparent
and at all
Friends of the Earth Europe (FOEE) considers that, Theinfirst general,
question ethical,above andreferred
transparent to ethical lobbying lobbying can helpwhichpolicy
goesdevelopment
further than t
However,
We agree itthat
should be pointed
lobbying Integrity;Equality
can outperhaps
indeed that
helplobbying
of ac
policy which Regulation
-Stopping
development sanctions is
is transparent only
ifforitprivilegedone
non-compliance
is not
istransparent
transparentelement
They
always and tofair
are ensure
relatively
ethical.orThis fair
ethical.
But tran lobbying.
Any from
apart Enforcement
attempt beingto regulate
ethical ofandany
lobbyi re
tra
A more pertinent question would be: what is ethical theand access lobbying?
by business consultation
interests: Lobbyists
focuses representing
on the lobby
Integrity;Other
The Commission's November 2014 transparency Prioritising (please The representativeness,
reforms which the public
prevent They
interest:
commissioners are relatively
Public and and tran
private
senior(business)
officials from interests
meeting canwith con
Interest representation and lobbying is elaborate
a vital partFor of any
this democracy
reason, Transparency
closely relatedInternational
to universal advocates
invalues such
for
far abeyond
as
three
afreedom
Other (please Corporate tier system
of inte
spe
Transparency is only one element, albeit an essential Preventing
one, ofinterests,
unscrupulous
ethical wit No
lobbying. opinion
lobbying:
But ethical
Lobbying lobbying thegoescontext of conflict
transparenof
1. a core of strong regulations,
Other (please elaborate All lobby transparency rules No opinion
must be placed in this wider, ethical context.
Lobbyists come in many forms as diverse as environmental 2. an additional NGOs layer
or multinational
of Codes of Conduct companies. for Expertise
public officialsis provided
and to policy
Integrity;Other (please honesty 3. a functional, strong sphere of They arecivil
notsociety
transparent monitoring.at all
til e
We absolutamente
see, however, thatnethe Integrity;Equality
misbehaviour ofofaac few Diversidade
is sufficient to dediscredit
opinio.an They entire areprofession.
relatively tran The risk of undue influence and
Ethical and transparent Integrity;Equality of acc In Integrity is veryTransparency
this context, very impTheyInternational are relativelysees transparent
a clear priority in the overhau
Any attempt to regulate lobbying Integrity;Equality
must address of accthe broader issue of equality They of opportunities
are relatively of tran access, structural imbalances i
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac Wichtiger als "gleichber They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Oglnie rzecz biorc etyczna i przejrzysta dziaalno Ograniczenie
lobbingowa uprzywilejowanej
pomaga w ksztatowaniu pozycji lobbystw polityki.reprezentujcych
Wanym jest abyinteresy procesyg
Integrity;Equality of access They are highly transparent
Transparenz
Samo wprowadzenie im Bereich der Interessenvertretung
Integrity
i zreformowanie Rejestru Przejrzystoci schafft mehrUE
Ograniczenie Vertrauen
nietycznego
nie oznacza und
They Rckhalt
are relatively
lobbingu,
jednak, in dziaalno
die transparent
dziaajcego
e w imieniu
lobbingowa toksycznego
w UE bdzie prz
Politik,
Interestindem sie Machtmissbrauch
representation Integrity;Equalityund Korruption
of ac Proved erschwert.
competence Die Nachvollziehbarkeit
andThey ex are relatively von politischen
tran
Entscheidungen
Naley jednak podkreli, und eineIntegrity;Equality
politische
e lobbing,Rechenschaftslegung
ktryofjest
accprzejrzysty,
Zasady etyczne tragen
nie zawsze zu mehr
dla urzdnikw:
jest Vertrauen
They
jednoczenie
areefektywna
not in transparent
politische
etyczny.
regulacja Strukturen
Lobbyci
lobbingumog wymaga
ujawnia niews ty
und ihre Institutionen sowie zu einem hheren Ma von Akzeptanz der Politik bei. Zudem regt Transparenz
Det r viktigt fr besluts Equality of access They are relatively tran
zur Partizipation der Brger an, was nicht nur Brgernhe schafft, indem die Ansichten der Brger Eingang in
die EU-Politik finden, sondern Integrity auch dazu fhrt, dass Other principles, we
Kompromisse suggest,
zwischen They are relatively
would
Ansichten include
gefunden, transparent
openness, accessibility, accounta
akzeptiert
und implementiert werden knnen. Integrity;Equality of access We think that while it is They
necessary are not
to transparent
regulate at
lobbying all activities, legislators s
Lobbying
Dem is a vital
Austausch mitpart Integrity;Equality NGOs
Interessenvertretern, of ac und We anderen
also thinkAkteuren that the responsibility
der They are relatively
Zivilgesellschaft for transparent tran eine
kommt policy making should be e
erhebliche Bedeutung zu, Integrity;Equality
weil mit ihm neue of Aspekte
acc Es Diegehrt
und Ideen
Regulierung zum in Wesen die Interessenvertretung
der Entscheidungsprozesse
ein They are relativelygegenber tran einflieen. den EU-Institutionen so
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Der Verband der Kali- unIntegrity;Other (please Der Verband der Kali- und They Salzindustrie
are relatively sprichttran sich selbstverstndlich dafr
Der Bundesverband der IEntegrity;Other (please Die Regulierung der Int They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Interessenvertretung
Transparent lobbying is helps Integrity;Equality
to ensure democratic of ac Ein Nachweis derprocesses
decision-making Kompete Theythat areare relatively
open totran scrutiny, at all stages of decision
Integrity;Equality of ac Appropriate legislation They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of acc Representativeness and They e are relatively tran
un lobbismo che usa mezz Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
- introducing a legal requirement on public bodies to publish the results of con
- making open all calls for applications to sit on advisory/expert groups and in
Interest representation and lobbying is a vital partReasoning of any democracy closely related to universal values such as freedom of spe
Regulation is only one element to ensure fair lobbying. Enforcement of any re
Lobbyists come in many forms as diverse as environmental Policy makers NGOs have or amultinational
duty to seekcompanies.
out informed Expertise
specialists is provided to policy p
in the respective
It
For is up
this to the
reason, EU institutions
Transparency to make sure
International that the
advocates interest
for a representation
three tier system bec
Interest representation Integrity;Equality of ac Furthermore, legislators should They are seek
relatively
a balance tran between the regulation of lob
We see, however, that the misbehaviour of a few 1. is a
sufficient
core of strong to discredit
regulations,
an entire profession. The risk of undue influence and
Any decision-making proc Equality of access What should be layer done of They
byCodes
the EU areinstitutions
not transparent to public
introduce the right
2. an additional of Conduct for officials and balance is:
Integrity;Equality
Any attempt to regulate lobbying must address the of access- broader
3. To limitissue
a functional, thestrong
number
of equality They
sphere of ofare
of meetings relatively
with
opportunities
civil society transparent
theof business
monitoring. lobbies; imbalances i
access, structural
Integrity;Equality of access -Die Regulierung
To ensure a der They are
rightInteressenvertretung
balance relatively
between transparent
thegegenber
industry and dencivil society represen
EU-Institutionen so
Lobbying plays an importaIntegrity;Equality
Efforts to shed transparency on lobbying, should einenof ac -
In
take The
thisinto European
context,
consideration
offenen, Commission
Transparency
transparenten No opinion
the challenges in particular,
International butaDialog
in determining
und regelmigen sees also
clear the
whose other
priority
der ininstitutions
interests
Organe themitoverhau
are
den m
rep re
Integrity;Equality of acc der Zivilgesellschaft zu untersttzen They are relatively(Artikeltran 11 EUV). Manahmen zur Strku
Integrity;Equality of access Allgemeinen sowie die Beschlsse They are relatively tran
der Europischen Kommission zur Verffe
Le lobbies devono alimen Integrity;Equality of ac Mitgliedern
vedere osservazione der Kommission al No opinionoder Generaldirektoren ber Meetings mit Intere
a transparent lobbying i Equality of access;Othe Folge Equality haben,
Transparency dass
of access die Organe
should
International Nobelieves diesen
opinion Dialog
that vernachlssigen.
full lobbying transparency Denn is dann
the foun k
Die Henkel AG & Co. KGaAIntegrity;Other (please einem
Die transparenten,
Regulierung der offenen und
InteThey are regelmigen
relatively tran Dialog nicht nach. Da die O
We are convinced that the democratic process is Sachverhalte improved by decision regulieren, makers
ist dielistening to those affected
Interessenvertretung undby der policy
Austauschdecision berdu
Furthermore, we are alsoIntegrity;Equality
convinced that most Recommendations
of acdecision
Une parfaite
Transparencymakers transparencThey
is
have
at the
the core are
appropriate
of the relatively
issue.
level The
of tran
integrity
Brussels andenvironment
apply this in
is their
charac sta
Fakten
To in der Praxis
complement the mit Unternehmen und Wirtschaftsverbnden eine fornotwe
We
It is are equally
essential forconvinced Integrity;Equality
the quality that advocacy
of the has
of acc
to be
EU policy-making We
Die done
nonetheless
in
theanEU
Regulierung
that
EU-Regulierung. derintegrity
ethical
welcome
and They system
transparent
reasonable
are
Interessenvertretung
institutions have
and
a relatively
mannerthe
rules
transparent
existing
tran
andand
gegenber
and
Code
regulations
therefore
open
of asConduct
we
dendialogue support
thosewithfunction
EU-Institutionen the
all
inte
re
so
rele
Die Lufthansa Group betIntegrity;Other (please -
LHGclear expectations
spricht sich of impartiality
selbstverstndlich
They are and fidelity
relatively
dafr aus, to
tran public
dass - interest;
basierend auf gemeinsa
Die deutsche Automobilindustrie setzt sich fr einen transparenten,
- practical guidanceregelmigen
on how to deal und praxistauglichen
with gifts and hospitality, Dialog
EK has been
zwischen deninEU-Institutionen
the Transparency
Integrity;Other
undRegister
allen(please
since Der
It
Stakeholdern2008.
is important
VDA
ein.spricht that theselbstverstndlich
Interessenvertretung
sich They are relatively
gegenber dafr tranEU dass
den
- guidance on handling official information, andaus, Institutionen
communication- basierend ist ein
with aufkonstr
third geme
part
Entscheidungen. Integrity;Other (please beschlossenen und realisierten
They are
- a robust system of conflicts of interest management, Pflichten
relatively - alle
tran Stakeholder auch die gleichen
Integrity;Equality of access - periodic disclosure of interests, They arerules relatively
regardingtransparent
incompatibility of simultaneo
Integrity;Equality of access - a rule to only meet registered They are not transparent at all
lobbyists,
Interest representation i Integrity;Equality of ac -Die control
Trustworthiness,
Expertise of thelokaler
revolving unddoors
represeThey between
are
regionaler relatively the tran
public and the private
Gebietskrperschaften und ihrer sectors,
Verbn an
Oberste Prioritt sollte Integrity;Equality of acc -Es Diesanctions
derzeit
ist wichtig forsicherzustellen,
non-compliance
geltenden Regeln
They unterscheiden
are relatively
dass nicht nurtran aberdenjenigen
von zwischen zwei grundstzlic
partikulare Intere
Lobbying/InteressensverIntegrity;Equality of ac Weiter sollte bercksichtigt They werden,
are relatively
dass Kommunentran sowie ihre Gremien, Ve
Equality of access can be strengthened by:
A mandatory register woul Integrity They are relatively tran
- approving legal requirements that allow citizens, interest groups and corpor
Integrity;Equality of access - introducing a legal requirement They areon relatively
public bodiestran to publish the results of con
See attached written su Equality of access;Othe -Die See attached
making openwritten
Regulierung allder
calls suforThey are relatively
applications
Interessenvertretung to sit tran
on advisory/expert
gegenber groups andso
den EU-Institutionen in
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Interest representation
Die deutsche Wirtschaftand lobbying is a(please
Integrity;Other vital partReasoning
Zu of "Gleichberechtigter
any democracy closely related
Zugang":
They areIm toSinne
universal
relatively tranvalues
einer such as freedom
ausgewogenen Interessensvof spe
Integrity Regulation is only one element They areto relatively
ensure fair lobbying. Enforcement of any re
transparent
Transparency International believes that full lobbying transparency is the foun
Lobbyists
those groupscomemust in many
be regIforms as diverse of
ntegrity;Equality asaccess
environmental NGOs or multinational They are companies.
not transparent Expertise
at all is provided to policy
In general, ethical and transparent lobbying helpsFor To policy
achieve
thisdevelopment
a sound
reason, framework
and it is important
Transparency for relations
International to makewith sure
lobbyists,
advocates that
for the
athe processes
following
three would
tier systemto se
Lobbying has gotten a veEquality of access Recommendations They are highly transpar
We see, however, that the misbehaviour of a few 1. is a
sufficient
core of strong to discredit
regulations,
an entire profession. The risk of undue influence and
Transparent lobbying is about Integrity;Equality
more than just of acthe ToEU's
2.
complement
Availability
Stopping
an lobby the
additional of openthe data
transparency
privilegedintegrity
layer of accessThey system
are
register.
Codes
and
relatively
byConduct
of The
business thetransparent
Commission existingshould
interests:
for
Code of
Lobbyists
public officials
Conduct
extend
andrepresenting
for inte
the wider t
Integrity;Equality of access - clear expectations of impartiality
They and
arecivil fidelity
notsociety
transparent to public interest;
at allstructural imbalances i
Any attempt to regulate lobbying must address the3. broader
a functional, issuestrong
of equality
sphere of ofopportunities ofmonitoring.
access,
However, it should be pointed Other out(please
that lobbying
elaboratewhich-Ethics
practical
is rules guidance
transparent
for those ison inhow
not the
No to deal
always
institutions:
opinion with Itgifts
ethical. andjust
Lobbyists
is not hospitality,
may
aboutmake rules fullfordisclosures
lobbyists,
- guidance on handling official information, and communication with third part
Efforts to shed transparency Integrity;Equality
on lobbying, should
of acc In takethisinto
context,
consideration
Transparency the
Theychallenges
International
are relatively
in determining
sees
tran a clear whose
priority interests
in the overhau
are rep
- a robust system of conflicts of interest management,
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
- periodic disclosure of interests, rules regarding incompatibility of simultaneo
Integrity;Equality of access - a rule to only meet registered They are relatively transparent
lobbyists,
Equality of access - control of the revolving They doorsare relatively
between the transparent
public and the private sectors, an
Integrity;Equality of ac -Diffusionesanctions"istituzionale
for non-compliance They are not transparent at all
Oui, mais il doit absolumNo opinion They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access Equality of access can be strengthened
They are relatively by: transparent
- approving legal requirements that allow citizens, interest groups and corpor
Lobiranje, kot se izvaja Equality of access;Othe Na zakonie naj imajo mo They are relatively transparent
- introducing a legal requirement on public bodies to publish the results of con
Integrity;Equality of access - making open all calls forThey are relatively
applications to sittransparent
on advisory/expert groups and in
Sistem bi bil lahko ureje Integrity;Equality of acc preglednost, The regulation obveanjeThey are not transparent at all focus on the suppo
Public rating of of thelobbying
works and towards
their EUcourse Institutions
of action, should
with effective power on b
etica e trasparenza sonoEquality of access Reasoning They are
An added level of transparency is required beforehand. not transparent at all
Interest
Volkswagenrepresentation
promotes aand tr lobbying is a vital
Integrity;Equality of acpartRegulation
of any democracy
Volkswagen isasonly one
closely
a matter element
of related
Theycourse
areto relatively
ensure
to universal
supports fair lobbying.
tran values
equal such
chances Enforcement
as all
for freedom of any
of spe
stakeholder re
The transparency registeIntegrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Suggestion: Do not allow the vote of citizens to be challenged by particular in
Lobbyists
Ethical andcome in many Integrity;Equality
transparent forms as diverse of asacenvironmental
For this reason, NGOsTransparency
or multinational
They are International
companies.
relatively tran advocates
Expertisefor is aprovided
three tier tosystem
policy
1. a core of strong regulations,
Integrity They are relatively transparent
We see, however, that the misbehaviour of a few 2. is an
sufficient
additional to discredit
layer of an Codesentire ofprofession.
Conduct forThe public
riskofficials
of undue and influence and
Integrity;Equality of access 3. a functional, strong sphere They of arecivil
relatively
societytransparent
monitoring.
En
Anyeffet, dans
attempt toleregulate
cadre dIntegrity;Equality
lobbying must address of accthe Labroader
reprsentativit, la They
issue of equality are relatively of
of opportunities tranaccess, structural imbalances i
Integrity They
In this context, Transparency International sees are relatively transparent
a clear priority in the overhau
Efforts to shed transparency Integrity;Equality
on lobbying, should
of acc take into consideration the Theychallenges
are relatively
in determining
tran whose interests are rep
Das Forum Umwelt und Entwicklung erkennt an, dass die Kommunikation mit einem breiten Spektrum von Gruppen und Orga
Lthique et la transparence des activits de lobbying sont essentielles la confiance des citoyens lgard des responsables
Grundstzlich begren wir, dass dass die EU-Kommission
Derzeit sehen
undwir
dasmit
Europische
Sorge einenParlament
sehr starkimprivilegierten
Bereich Sichtbarmachen
Zugang fr Wirtsch
von L
Cest dans cet esprit que le Groupe Socit Gnrale a rejoint en 2014 les principes de reprsentation responsable dfinis pa
Transparente Lobbyarbeit ist aber noch lange nicht
Aber ethisch
auch einwandfrei,
qualitativand unterscheiden
immer wieder sich
beobachten
die tran
Zugnge wir der
fragwrdige
verschiedenenMethoden Akte
En outre,
Ethical and conformment Integrity;Equality
transparent lobbying does notetof
ces principes ac representativeness
cetteThe
necessarily charte, helpdans
abundant le cadre de
the development
financial They sa
resources are relatively
of politique
policies de reprsentation
of business
that are lobby
balanced groups responsable,
and and SocitpP
representative.
businesses
Derzeit beobachten wir, dass Integrity;Equality
Regelverste of acc
gegenNotre
Dieden
Auch engagement
Regulierung
inhaltlich
Verhaltenskodex derauprs
gibt es They
unserer are
Interessenvertretung highly
des EU-Transparenzregisters
Ansicht transparent
nach gegenber
ein starkes den EU-Institutionen
leider
Ungleichgewicht
kaum geahndet so
zwis
In general though, UNI Europa Equality wishes
of access;Othe
to underline Due thetoimportance
the recognised of transparency
consultation
No opinion and
andurgescollective
the Commission
bargaining rights to extend
in relation
the tr
We believe the opportunity to interact with policy makers and contact MEPs, officials or other staff of the EU institutions is cruc
Die
Diese deutsche
Befragung Wirtschaft
fokussiert Integrity;Other
sich auf das(please Die
Lobbyregister
InsgesamtBDA undspricht
viele sich
mussunserersichselbstverstndlich
They
diefolgenden are relatively
EU unserer dafr
Anmerkungen
Meinung tran
aus,
nach dass
viel -strker
werden basierend
sich auch
gegen aufberm
daraufgeme ko
Equality of access The representativeness, No relevance
opinion and expertise of the stakeholders concern
All these activities have to respect ethical principles and be transparent to guarantee that
are to be taken into account by the European Commission and Parliament. A the public policy adapts to the public
Integrity;Equality of ac PUBBLICIT' attraverso They l' are not transparent at all
coherent policy for open dialogue with the relevant stakeholders depending o
Integrity;Equality of acc Accurate the issue at stake is important are
and updated infT hey relatively tran
for transparency.
A transparent and theopen Integrity;Equality
dialogue pharmaceutical of access
between the EUindustry institutions
Bodies and allinrelevant
representing They are not transparent at all
EFPIA represents innovative operating Europe. Through its direct membership of 33 national as
stakeholders is vital for high Integrity;Equality of access;No
quality EU policy-making. opinion
collective interests of wide economic They are relatively
and societaltransparentrelevance have to be
I fully agree in the concept discussed here, that the ethical and transparent lobbying help policy development, but I think the is
We
EFPIA support
has open
been and
signed traIntegrity;Other
up to the (please
Transparency recognised
Register since as playing
its inception a specific
They in are
2009, role.
relatively
and has tran
provided the necessary informati
-CIP Thelists
registration
its meetingsin thewithTranspaency
leaders of EU Register can't
institutionsThebe optional or voluntary.
inrepresentativeness, relevance and expertise of the stakeholders concern
-itsAllwebsite,
the organisations Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
as well as MUST
it does register,
with otherwise
letters, ormembers
otherthey
areforms cannot
to be
ofdo be allowed
taken
communication.
into account to meet
in by
with
the the MEPs Commission
European nor have anyand kindParliament.
of contact w A
-EFPIA
A MemberGeneral Principles
of the European Integrity;Other
also specify
Parlaiment that
(please
or the EFPIA
European that prizes nottransparency
Comission participate
MUST They the
are
register EU relatively
Transparency
every
coherent policy for open dialogue with the relevant stakeholders depending
tran he
meeting Register
has with shall not beinfluen
potential inclu
o
-CIPThis meeting registration Integrity;Other
has (please Iidentification andthe potent They are of relatively transparent
fully supported the aims of to
theinclude
Europeanan abstract fully
Commission
the ofagree
issue theto meeting,
at with
increase
stake iswith
participation
the
important people who
organised
for transparency. joined groups
the meeting,
Bodies from the
thecivil
representingmain society
subject ta
-transparency
The measures to be
since applied
their Equality
conceptionin the
of access;Othe
event
10 years of non-compliance
ago.So, regulation
collective
The same with
in this
interests
goes theofcode
for area
the
wide They
newhas
of conduct
are
to benefit
economic relatively
(ANNEX
and the tran
equality
societal 9 inrelevance
theof Rules
access ofand
haveProcedure
tothe
be rightino
Integrity;Equality
transparency rules on contacts between Commissioners of access recognised (andas cabinets
playing and They are
a specific role. highly transpar
Industry
director
The feedback
generals)
American based
and
Chamber Integrity;Equality
interest
of representatives
Commerce of acc
to the and According
European its overarching
Union to (AmCham
article aim11tooEU) They is are relatively
a unique tran
organisation representing over 160 c
bring the EU closer to itsIntegrity;Other
citizens. (please They are relatively tran
The issue is to clearly define what is understood by ethical and transparent lobbying and to have a level playing-field for all sta
AmCham EU believes transparency Integrity;Other and(please
ethical behaviour
AmCham benefit EU haspolicy always development,
They
stri are relatively as they tran
ensure proper scrutiny from sta
Integrity;Equality of access They
We would welcome that the Commission, the Council, the Parliament and the Committee of the Regions inter alia use as a ba are relatively tran
Expertise from stakeholdIntegrity;Equality of access Oltre alla trasparenza, lintegrit They aree relatively
la parit di accesso (concetti se non sinoni
tran
Integrity;Equality of access Secondo il Parlamento europeo,
They are Integrit
relatively significa
transparent parit di accesso e di pes
The OECD Guidelines also state usefully as the first of its 10 Principles for Transparency and Integrity in Lobbying: Public offi
Da questo punto di vista, la valorizzazione nel rapporto a livello europeo tra is
No opinion The issue is to clearly d They are relatively tran
Volendo aggiungere ulteriori principi/valori rispetto al tema dei rapporti tra isti
Wintershall is committedIntegrity;Equality of acc Il At Wintershall,
est
Inoltre, important
ai finithatdiwe
de consi They
prendre
garantire laen are
compte
trasparenza relatively
la del tran
reprsentativit
processo des stakeholders.
decisionale, potrebbe
We believe
Gleichberechtigter integrity
Zugang and equality
besteht of access
nicht, wenn are essential
bestimmten principles
Lobbyisten for acr
diritto -costit
Integrity;Equality of ac They are relatively tran z.B.
Il giudizio positivo motivato dalla circostanza che Il principio
il lobbying, di trasparenza,
nellordinamento inoltre,italiano,
potrebbe costituisce
essere esercizio
ulteriormente di unrafforzato da
Z.B. begnstigen in knapp bemessene Konsultationsfristen oder erst spt
Inoltre,
Principles dalofpunto
better vistaIntegrity;Equality
di regulation
pratico le lobby
should ofdaaccess
tradursi
be applicable A
In tal
to fine,
inrecently
theall italiano
si ritiene
stakeholders agreedgruppi
opportuno
that They
di are relatively
pressione
rendere
Inter-Institutional
participate intutte
the transparent
oAgreement
rappresentanti
le informazioni
regulatory di
onprocess.
Bettersull'influenza
interesse
Having the
Law-Making, awhr
delle
live
sam
th
Integrity;Equality of acc They are relatively tran
Gleichberechtigter Zugang beinhaltet auch, dass Partikularinteressenvertrete
Entgegen der in den Medi Integrity;Equality
The OECD lists transparency as one of the central of ac Wichtig
The pillars
above ist u.a.
of sound die Sic
points regulation.
are also They are relatively
highlighted
Businesses in theneedtran
OECDto bereport
able to Lobbyists,
fully understand
Govern
Voll zugestimmt wird, sofern Integrity;Equality
sehr hohe und of effektive
ac Integritt Standards der Ethik, They
und Transparenz are relatively
Transparenz
erfordern es,
und tran
missbrauchsanfllige
diesbezglicher Kontrolle
relevanteverhinde
Vern
Im Einzelnen unter 1.1.c.Integrity;Equality
und 2.2. of ac representativeness: ho They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of ac Die Rechtssubjekte,
Transparenz die dervon They
demokratisch
Gesetzgebung are relatively
darflegitimierten
tranzur Beeintrchtigung
nicht Gremien regiert von werdenBrg(
Integrity;Equality of ac Reciprocity in terms of the They are relatively transparent
way both the European Institutions and lobbyists d
No opinion Proportionality - reportingNo opinion
requirements being upwardly proportionate to the a
Pas de commentaires Integrity;Equality of ac La Accountability - an element of are
reprsentativit et l They relatively tran
accountability should be infused into the report
Un
It islobbying
vital thatthique
not onlyet transparent contribue
Integrity;Equality totalement la bonne laboration
of acc They are desnot politiques.
transparent
No opinion Lgalit daccs des groupes No opinion
Dans l'inconscient collectif, le lobbying auprs des Institutions est bien souvent de peru pression
comme aux une dcideurs est primordiale
limite l'exercice dmocratice q
Aujourdhui largement prIntegrity;Equality of acc Il sagit ainsi de tendre vers They une are highly
administration
transparent dlibrative permettant de
We consider both integrity and equality of access as important principles whic
Le lobbying est aussi l'outil Integrity;Equality
qui doit mieux of access
inspirer Illes
nous Institutions
parait galementeuropennes, They
important are
perueshighly
d'ajouter transparent
par les
: opinions publiques comme lo
Die Transparenz der Gesetzgebung darf nicht, das in Art. 47 Abs. 2 S. 2 verb
Integrity;Equality of access - La gestion
The des conflits dintrt
representativeness, They are relatively
relevance and expertise transparent
of the stakeholders concern
Pour toutes ces raisons, Integrity;Equality
Il nous parait ncessaireof ac Zudem- dencourager
Surveillance du
lintervention
Pantouflage
muss sichergestellt They desare
(Revolving
werden, lobbies
relatively
dassdans door)
klartranla sphre publique
zwischen en encadran
der anwaltlichen Bera
Lobbying has to be doneIntegrity;Equality of ac It is equally important that They positions
are relatively
taken bytran parties involved in lobbying activ
Integrity;Equality of acc They are relatively tran
Il s'agit d'un mcanisme Integrity;Equality of ac l'identification non qui They are relatively tran
Interest representation is considered an integral part of a healthy democratic system[1][2]. In this context, WWF agrees that et
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Other (please The identification
[1] Machiavelli in Brussels: The Art of Lobbying the EU (M. P. C. M. van Schendelen) of confThey are relatively tran
Confindustria
[2]
Eettinen fullyedunvalvonta
ja avoin supp Integrityei kuitenkaan automaattisesti The representativeness,
http://www.transparencyinternational.eu/2016/03/spring-cleaning-time-for-transparent-lobbying/
Yritysmaailman johda lobbareilla They
tasapainoisiin arelopputuloksiin.
on muihin relatively
sidosryhmiintran Allaverrattuna
olevassa ylivertaiset
kohdassa Bresu ma
[3] http://www.integritywatch.eu/ Integrity;Equality of ac WWF wishes to underlineThey are relatively tran
Ptksentekoprosessin
Un dialogue ouvert et transparent Equality
avoimuutta ofentre
access;Othe
on les
syyt list
Ammattiliitoille
institutions niin, deettei
l'UEyksikn
etkuuluu
touteskomission
oikeus
Noparties
les opinion
kyd virkamies
kollektiivisia
prenantes tapaa neuvotteluja.
rekisterimtnt
est essentiel pourSiksi
une lobbaria,
on trkejU
politique
Integrity;Other (please De faon globale, la rep They are
Un dialogue ouvert et transparent entre les institutions de l'UE et toutes les parties prenantes est essentiel pour une politique U relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac De faon globale, la rep They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
The EU therefore has an obligation to ensure that such transparency is achieved, which mandates for full transparency around
To achieve a sound framework for relations with lobbyists, the following would
The International
In general, ethicalStandards
and transparentfor Lobbying
lobbying Regulation
helpsWhilst
policyrecognise
International
development that transparency
Standards forofLobbying
and it is important lobbying to make Regulation
activities
sure thatis emphasise
keythetoprocesses
increasing
the integra
topub
se
Stopping the privileged access by business interests: Lobbyists representing
The Standards
Transparent can beisaccessed
lobbying about more here: http://lobbyingtransparency.net
than just the A.EU's Integrity is a very important
lobby transparency register.element to effective lobbying
The Commission should extendregulation. the widerBoth tl
Stopping lobbying on behalf of 'toxic' industries: An ethical approach to lobby
Geelmuyden
The need forthe Kiese
lobby believes that better
Integrity;Equality
regulation is ever information
more ofpressing
ac The leads
Access thetotocurrent
inInternational better political
information decisions, andleading
is They are to a context
relatively bettertransociety. That is our motivation,
Meanwhile, European Ombudsman has seriously criticised the Standards
Commission also
economic
foroutline
its poor restrictionsin which
implementation around there
ofthe
the ispre-
widespread
World and post
Health
Equality of access Ethics rules for those in the They are relatively
institutions: It is transparent
not just about rules for lobbyists,
We
It is agree
essential withthat
Transparency
diverse International
participation that [l]obbying
in public In
B. addition
decision-making
Equality is toan
of transparency,
integral
access, partunderstood
is guaranteed
as ofintegrity
aso healthy
that and
alldemocracy,
by equality
the
viewpoints of closely
Internationalaccess,
are taken related
we
Standards
intofind totrust
universa
account,
within and
the
he
However, it should be pointed
Other out
(please
that lobbying
elaborate which is transparent is not They
always areethical.
relatively Lobbyists
tran may make full disclosures
Die
We sterreichische
support the joint Indu Integrity
letteroffor a mandatory They are relatively transparent
Lobbying is one method participation butEU lobby
Trust
it needs
Theto register
beatregulated
right all[2]
to stages
co-signed
participate inorder
including
Transparency
should to ensure
be the decision
implemented International
a level makers,
playing
by EUfieldEU.
the interest
Geelmuyden
institutions
for all those representati
to the whoKiese
fulles
wis
Der Verband der Chemisc Integrity;Equality of ac Der VCI spricht sich da They are relatively tran
[1]
Whilst Integrity;Equality
there is no clear definition of ethicaloflobbying
access
http://www.transparencyinternational.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/The-EU-Legislative-Footprint.pdf
Effectiveness:
Guaranteeing
in a general Lobby
equality
sense, They
regulations
ofthere
access areis
are relatively
must
clear work
essential, transparent
effectively
internationalgiven that asin to
standards notthat
previous increase
the
yearsEUthe(20
Co
[2] http://www.transparencyinternational.eu/2015/10/joint-letter-for-a-mandatory-eu-lobby-register/
Integrity;Equality of ac They are relatively tran
In general,means
Lobbying ethicalthat
andstak
transparent lobbying
Integrity;Equality of helps To
Itpolicy
achieve
acfor transparency
isThemostly development
a sound framework
important and
aalso it is important
They for relatively
are relations to make with sure
tran lobbyists,
that thetheprocesses
following would to se
It is important to remember that responsibility C. EU institutions
should be shared
should by ensure
lobbyists that
and records
public are officials,
kept by butthe it isinstitut
public
Integrity;Equality of ac They are relatively tran
Transparent lobbying is about more than just the Stopping EU's lobby the transparency
privileged access register. byThebusiness Commission interests: should
Lobbyists
extend representing
the wider t
It is also important tha Equality of access We fully support full tr They are relatively tran
lobbying
Meanwhile, is never transpaIntegrity
the European Ombudsman has seriously Stopping criticisedlobbying the Commission
on behalf Theyofare for not
'toxic'
its poortransparent
industries: Anatethical
implementation all of
approach
the World to Health
lobby
Integrity They are relatively transparent
However, it should be pointed Integrity;Equality
out that lobbyingof ac which
Ethics is rules
transparent
for those is not
in theNo
always
institutions:
opinion ethical.ItLobbyistsis not justmay about makerules fullfordisclosures
lobbyists,
Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are not transparent at all
Equality of access They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of ac Accountability; MandatorThey are relatively tran
Problematina je meja oz. Equality of access Lobisti so plaani. Kako They are relatively tran
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Lobbying can help policy development as it can be a way for policy developers to receive and take account of a wide range of
We suggest that the concept Integrityof transparency should We believe be interpretedequity ofas access Theyisas
widely are relatively
important,
possible totransparent
rather thanthat
ensure equality.
all those Civilinvolved
society in or
EPF is committed to tranIntegrity;Other
Lobbying must also be ethical by which we meanIntegrity (please that bothand lobbyists
equality and They
of policy are
accessmakers relatively
are essential tran
must follow to ensurethe rules
that and
any lobbying
work in an is op
fa
Industry
We would feedback
argue thatbased
theIntegrity;Equality
best way to improve of acpolicy
According
The development
integrity to ofarticle
those 11lobbying
o Theytoare
is, however, and relatively
ensurebeing that tran
lobbied
as wide is equally
a rangeofofvital views importanc
as poss
Integrity;Equality of acc They are relatively tran
Un dilogo abierto y tra No opinion They are relatively tran
Lobbying and interactionIntegrity;Equality of acc Equality of access is cru No opinion
Transparenz und Offenhei Integrity;Other (please Vermittlung von Fachinf They are relatively tran
Stakeholders are an impor Integrity;Equality of ac In The ordercurrent to achieve
systemaalread complete
They are andrelatively
sound regulationtran on lobbying not only tran
Ethical and transparent lobbying regulation is an essential First, lobbying step in should
policybe development
performed accordingly for a number to ofthereasons.
principleFirst, of integrity
politician sin
Stakeholders are an impor Integrity;Equality of ac The current system alread They are relatively tran
A sound and effective lobbying regulation should Then, increase a regulation
the amount about
and athe firmer
qualityethicalof information
and a socially provided
responsible
to the general behaviour pu
Moreover, Ethical and transparent Integrity;Equality
lobbying ofpractices
acc Financing,
Finally,arean i.e. transparlobbying
a synonymous
appropriate ofThey
matured are relatively
regulation
political should tran also
system since balance
they imply the negative
that boths
se
Then,monopolista
the qualitynoof policiesIntegrity;Equality
is strongly related of access
to their
Finally, makingan appropriate isThey
of, since itregulation areof
impossible relatively
transparency
to separate transparent
results
should and not only
processescover lobbiewhen
Lorsquil existe
Transparent un cadr
lobbying Integrity;Equality
activities of ac La in
should be controlled transparence,
order to avoid lintg They are relatively
over-representation tran
of industries and business lobbies th
Integrity;Equality of ac Responsabilidad Social Corporativa They are relatively tran
e Inclusividad, haciendo referencia al co
Integrity;Equality of ac Comunicacin con los grupos They are de inters,
relatively incrementando
transparent as la capacidad de
We agree that EU institutions Integrity;Other
need to meet (please Defesa de
with relevant reputao to
stakeholders e aThey
adopt are sound relatively
decisions. transparent
However, for the lobbying to b
To ensure that the Commission and European Parliament are accountable they must providetran
Integrity;Other (please Einer einseitigen Inform They are relatively more information on the meeting
Integrity;Equality of access No opinion
We agree that ethical anEquality of access See comments under 1.1(a No opinion
I cannot
AFA firmlysay that I full
believes Integrity;Equality
that transparent of access
lobbying is a key issue in the EU policy-making They are not transparent
process. Thus, it is of utmost importance t
On this basis, AFA is in favour Integrity;Equality
of a constructive,
of ac openThe role and of transparent
the industry dialogue
They are withrelatively
the EU institutions.
tran
Integrity They are highly transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively transparent
Integrity;Equality of access They are relatively tran
Ethical and transparent lobbying are important to ensure a healthy policy development. For this reason, it is important to devel
Integrity;Equality of access
Die Aufgaben der Handwerkskammer als Krperschaft des ffentlichen Rechts They are sindrelatively transparent
in der Hand-werksordnung (HwO) festgele
Integrity;Equality of
It is also critical for EU decision-makers to ensureIntegrity ac La
Die reconnaissance
Akzeptanz
a balanced and access
Equality des
der Europischen
ofofthein
T hey
access are
different are relatively
Unionbothund
interests tran
der
important damit einhergehenden
to decision-makers.
principles soundpolitis
for aAccording framto
As a global company pres Integrity;Equality of access Codes of conducts should They
alsoare be relatively
developed tranwithin EU institutions which sho
Interessenvertretung
Finally policy development ist ein
Integrity;Other
konstruktiver
can (please
und notwendiger
only be guaranteed Fr
However,eine praxistaugliche
through Beitrag
inthe additionfr eine
developmentto suchAusgestaltung
They
ausgewogene
are
ofcodes, relatively
a culture der
it will und
of be Gesetze
tran
effektive
civil
critical
dialogue istpolitische
to es
at unverzichtbar,
address
all levels Entscheidung
the in theeine
imbalance EU
Other (please elaborate No opinion
Der Bayerische Handwerkstag (BHT) vertritt und Die
frdert
Akzeptanz
als Spitzenorganisation
der EuropischenderUnion
bayerischen
und der Handwerkskammern
damit einhergehenden
und
politis
-ve
BUT I will talk on behalf of the people who are showing BUT I will theirtalk
outrage
on behalf
due of to the
this people
decision. whoThearefact
showing
is that their
throughout
outragethis
dueLEGA
to th
High access to documents Very useful More debate on what lobby Fully agree
And that is the very thingVery
latively transparent is in useful
question NOW andAnd I think
thatyouis the
shouldverytake
thingunder
is in question
Partiallygreat
agreeconsideration
NOW and Ithe think
following:
you should take und
WHY did they (JNE) act the
latively transparent Veryway they did, I am sure
useful WHY thedid actions
they (JNE)
that putactTODOS
the
Fullyway POR
they EL
agree did,PERU
I am sureout the
of campaign
actions thatwere
putlong
TOD b
WHY
I havedid it happen
found at that
it incredib Notspecific
usefulmoment,
at all please
WHY take
I fail todid
asee
look
it happen
at the
what at
polls
those that
No historical
specific
opinionmoment,
data for the
please
last take
90 days
a lookandatyoull
the polls
see th
hi
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Transparency is importanPartially agree
Please also focus on the WHO, who actually shared Pleaselightalso
on thefocuserror
onmade
the WHO, by thewho
political
actually
party
shared
whichlight
greatly
on the
benefit
errorthe
made
otheb
There exists a quartier Somewhat useful I'm not aware of its exis Partially agree
Zum Beispiel
But most zum TTIP
Importantly VVeryquestion
please useful the WHY this Wenn
ButJNE mostes fr
officialjeden
Importantly eine
did not PFully
please
show agree
more
question
leniency
the WHY
towards
this the
JNEdemocratic
official didprocess
not show by
latively transparent
And that for some reasonVery the useful
JNE judgments is more
And that forgiven
for someand Ireason
am sureFully agree
theshe
JNEwilljudgments
be allow toiscontinue.
more forgiven and I am sure
I pray you can read this message
Very useful and can notice Ihowprayforyou mecan andread
those
thiswho
message
FullyI share
agreeand
the can
same notice
concern
how there
for meis and
clearly
those
a case
who f
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
exemple les perturbateurSomewhat useful mais pas suffisant un tr Fully agree
The decision making at tVery useful Disagree
Good to see so many conta Very useful Only if it organised with Fully agree
The secret TTIP negotiatio Very useful It is very useful in prin Disagree
Eher wenig transparent. Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
Ik heb me daar als particSomewhat useful Ik vraag me af of de gemPartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
The EU has rules guidingVery useful Very useful IF it
Ich fordere ein vollstndigesmeets Partially agree
verpflichtendes Transparentes, ffentliches Lob
ot transparent at all Very useful mit folgenden Eintrgen Fully Nameagree von Unternehmen und Gesprchspartner Dat
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
The EU Commission hasVery do useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Be honest. TTIp is claimed Fullyby agree
the EU as the most open trade negotiations ev
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful If the EU is not honest inPartially its reporting,
agreewhy should I trust a register?
ot transparent at all Very useful Aber nur, wenn alle Per Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Without feedback on the Fully c agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Not all meetings and peop Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful se diventa obbligatorio dDisagree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Confidence of current tr Somewhat useful independent policing andFully agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all It is not useful if it's exi Fully agree
Define "opposite of tran Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
European institutions onlVery useful Not only that should be Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
Democratic process is hiNot useful at all Legislation is in the int Disagree
latively transparent Not useful at all Partially agree
Het is reeds bekend dat Very useful Hier moet ook instaan w Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Even when transparent ISomewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
These tools should be designed to reach the public. It may sound silly but if t
It would perfect for the public for instance, if there was an indicator for lobbies
latively transparent
EU wide data and informationSomewhat useful
platforms need more centralisation on a single Partially agree
medium. More efforts should be put in communic
A whole campaign towards Somewhat
the publicuseful
on data accessibility
Additionally
The main is much
the transparency
problem needed. Disagree
with the register would
transparency benefit
register fromthere
is that beingisintegrated wita
no thematic
European Citizen never kSomewhat useful Some may consider this Disagree unnecessary and not costeffective, but this is called
In groen
There is a Teilen
lack ofarbeite Somewhat
adequate publicityuseful Das
in all member TransparenzregisterPartially agree
states.
latively transparent Somewhat useful Somewhat
All formal and informal Institutions must use TR point from which useful
allbecause Fully
interestedi parts
agreecan have access and express their opinio
Additionally all conversations,
Very useful
meetings, etc held In
byfact
EU itformal
must and
be the
informal
o Disagree
Institutions must be public followed.
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Extensive decision maki Very useful Fully agree
except treating TIP Somewhat useful more burocracy less trans Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Dziaania instytucji UE Very useful Partially agree
Gerade in kritischen Pu Somewhat useful Die weitaus meisten EU Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Molto utile se si delinea Fully agree
There is room for improvSomewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
Bei der Verhltnismig Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
latively transparent
Just who exactly is goingSomewhat useful meeting?
to the Bilderberg Fully agree
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-33067655
Not useful at all Open-source is the only Disagree
latively transparent No opinion No opinion
Brger in tgliche Arbe Very useful Fully agree
The EU gives the impressi Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful No opinion
Publish agendas of polit Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
NGO corporate models and conflicts of influence
latively transparent No opinion The basis of a conflict of Partially agree to be broadened. As it is now, the gen
interest needs
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
But NGOs sell their access and influence to foundations, trusts and large fun
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Any approach
Ideally, of be
it should politiciaNo
agreed uponopinion
that all actors involved in public debates hav
latively transparent Not useful at all Action point: Either allowDisagree
all actors to fully engage in the process (regardless
Uwaam, e instytucje eSomewhat useful Rejestr moe sta si baFully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
Example: TTIP. Horrifyin Very useful Fully agree
La Commission europenn Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful But should be more useful Fully agree
The European Commission Somewhat useful Fully agree
Relative means "a bit butVery useful It is a great first step. Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
Broadcast the European Somewhat useful Provide the public with f Partially agree
Somewhat useful Disagree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Auch hier wird auf den Disagree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
Bei beispielswiese d Somewhat useful In den EU-Vertrgen ist Partially agree
Don't really care as we wNot useful at all Pretty much anything prop Disagree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent
Actuellement c'est l'opacit Very la useful
plus complte vu l'absence de publicit desFully agree servant aux prises de dcisions.
documents
La deuxime source d'opacit Very useful
est l'imprcision des Trsrencontres
utile si les
entre
personn
les partenaires
Partially agree(agendas).
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful But it depends on the usPartially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful In order to be very usef Fully agree
latively transparent Not useful at all Impossibile verificare co Partially agree
On this
nous I don't avons
citoyens know eno Somewhatde
la perception useful I don't
fonctionnaires know enough
glandeurs, qui ontabou
unFsalire
ully agree
indcent des des avantages inacceptables, sa
nous avons aussi l'impression Somewhat que leuseful
bon sens de certaines dcisions est Partially absolument agree
absent, preuve de pression de lobbys
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
En ocasiones
The no sehave
EU institutions trataVery useful some important transparency measures
introduced Fully agree transparency varies between them. The
although
as above No opinion No opinion
ot transparentLobby
at all register: As mentioned elsewhere there should be a legally-binding No
Very useful register,
opinionwith comprehensive disclosure requiremen
ot transparentThe
at all Very useful Fully agree
EU institutions have introduced some important transparency measures when compared to some Member States, althoug
Proactive meetings transparency:
latively transparent No opinion All EU institutions
Theshould
idea ofonly
a lobby
meetregister
withPartially
registered
as a tool lobbyists,
to bring transparency
agree lists of meetings to EU
should
lobbying
be pro
is
exemple : les ngociatio
Lobby register: Very useful
As mentioned elsewhere there should be a legally-binding Fully agree
register, with comprehensive disclosure requiremen
Trilogues: These informal inter-institutional meetings A lobby
between
register
thewhich
Europeanis noParliament,
longer voluntary,
the Council
but whichof theis European
backed by Union
the forcean
Somewhat useful Wenn sich abzeichnet, da Fully agree
ot transparentProactive
at all to meetings
Access documents:transparency:
Somewhat
Reforms to All EUthe
institutions
useful
bring Access The
Asto should
apresent
result,only
Documentsaregister
meet is
with
commitment highly-flawed
regulation registered
Partially lobbyists,
and
startagree
to1049/2001 serious
linealists
negotiating
into changes
with ofthe
meetings
legally-binding mustof
Treaty should
result
lobby
Lisbonfrom
bebypro
register th
w
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
Trilogues:
European These informalSomewhat
Allinter-institutional meetings
A
In lobby
between
register
thetransparency
which
Europeanis Fully
anolegally-binding
Parliament,
longer
agreevoluntary,
bethe Council
butregister
which
of theis
is European
backed by Union
the force
an
Ombudsman: European useful
Ombudsman the
decisions
meantime,on before should binding
lobby for EU institutions.
introduced, it will b
latively transparent Very useful
Access to documents: Reforms to bring the Access Asto a result,
Documentsa commitment Partially
regulationto1049/2001 agree
start negotiating
into linea with
legally-binding
the Treaty of lobby
Lisbon
register
by w
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
Wnschenswert
European wre hier
Ombudsman: Very useful Ombudsman
All European Das
In theTransparenzregister
decisions
meantime, before Fully
on transparency agree be binding
a legally-binding
should lobby register
for EU institutions.
is introduced, it will b
Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
As noted in the EuropeanVery useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Soweit es auf StakeholdePartially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Soweit es auf StakeholdePartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
I am informed by an MEPVery useful Provided it is properly m Partially agree
I worked as an 'expert e Somewhat useful Since the grain size is quPartially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
The European Council isVery useful Fully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
they are relatively trans Very useful Thetransparency
Transparencymeasures.
Register Fully agree
isHowever,
a criticalthere
step in
The EU institutions have introduced some important is the
much regulation
that could of be
lobbying.
improved Suffa
latively transparent Somewhat useful It is difficult to compa Partially agree
The
Lobby quality
Zur Strkung of der
register: transparen Very useful
AsTransparenz
mentioned elsewhere The Register,
there should
und der Verlsslichkeit be
deraDaten inimitsTransparenzregister
current
legally-binding Partially
format,agree
register is not
with sufficient.
comprehensive
sollten It needs
die EU- to include
disclosure
Institutionen einregular
requirement
integr
latively transparent Somewhat useful Die Vergleichbarkeit der Partially Daten imagree
Register sollte dringend gestrkt werden. D
They
Es ist are
Proactive sehrfar, fardass
meetings
gut, more t Very
transparency:
die useful
All EU institutions
EU-Institutionen viele ihrer should only meet
UmArbeitsunterlagen
Transparenz with Partially
zu strken,registered
ffentlich agree
sollten lobbyists
zugnglich (or those who fall under
Nichtregierungsorganisationen
machen und politische the thre
Beratungen
verpflicht
Somewhat useful Fully agree
Tobacco lobby: All EU
Finding information in ainstitutions
rNot usefulsigned
at all up to theALTER-EU
If World
I couldHealthhas
find it Organisation's
Ilong-supported
would f Fully agreeFramework
the idea ofConvention
a lobby registeron Tobacco
as a tool Control
to bring sht
Er
In bestaat
groen geen
Teilen verplic
arbeiten Somewhat
dieany useful
europischen Er wordt waarschijnlijk, Fully agree
They
Access aretonot transparent
documents: in
ALTER EU welcomesInstitutionen
way: Das
reforms Transparenzregister
transparent.
For ALTER-EU,
to bring regulation In einzelnen
a lobby kann ein
1049/2001
register Fllen
ntzliches
which
into isjedoch,
linenowithInstrument
longerwievoluntary,
the z.B. den
Treaty zur
of Regulierung
Lisbon
but which is der
by widenbac
latively transparent
-Kriterien zur Auswertung
at functionaries Very
level - DGs useful
von ffentlichen Konsultationen,
jedoch sichergestellt
Trilogverhandlungen Fully dass
werden, agree
und beidieder
in den
Auswahl
Vertrgen
von Mitgliedern
verankerte von Offenheit
Exper
-Trilogues:
at CommissionThese level Somewhat
- politicians
informal useful
- as well as
inter-institutional at EU
meetings
As a Parliament
between
result, wethelevel
wish
European
to seePartially agree thetoCouncil
Parliament,
a commitment start negotiating
of the European
a legally-bindin
Union an
- at member States levelSomewhat in their influencing
useful EU policies
Open access to meetingsPartially agree
latively transparent
TTIP: The European Commission Very usefulshould follow the In the
European
meantime, before Disagree
Ombudsmans a legally-binding
recommendations lobbyand register
provide
is introduced,
full transparency
it will b
Somewhat useful Fully agree
EU.n toimielimet ovat avVery useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Transparency in the mostNot useful at all Disagree
A certain degree of confidentiality is inevitable and essential to any political process that is based on negotiation between diffe
latively transparent Not useful at all Grundstzlich halten wir Fully agree
das EU-Transparenzregister fr ein eher ntzliches I
Europische Behrden ag
Somewhat useful
Whether it be discussions in Coreper at Ambassadorial In der aktuellen
The Transparency Form
level on a Council sind
Register Partially
allerdings
General agreegroe
is an appropriate europische
Approach; meetings
minimumbetween Interessenvertreter
tool for the oversightag
rapporteurs o
Die Kommunen begren Somewhat
d useful Die Zielrichtung und FunFully agree
ot transparentHowever,
at all Somewhat
such non-transparency at useful
certain pointsThe in the
Register
process is aneeds toPartially
sensible be
minimum agree
balanced instrument
by transparencyto enable andoversight
opportunities
of theforintef
Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Certaines rencontre de se Fully
fontagree
en dehors des heures et des jours prvu par
Il faut d'urgence faire Not useful at all Exemple RDV le dimanche Partially
matinagree
pour un petit lobby-brunch....( Diesel Gate)
Et ce n'est pas forcmenSomewhat useful Cependant, cela ne suffiNo opinion
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Not useful at all Rejestr jako element funDisagree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
It is not clear to me as No opinion I and many of my friendsNo opinion
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
Zuerst werden endlose TNot useful at all Welches angebliche TranDisagree
i risultati delle loro op Not useful at all bisogna monitorare le attDisagree
Wahrscheinlich ist viele Very useful Wie vorhin angesprochen Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful No opinion
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
latively transparent No opinion Partially agree
The availability of docu Somewhat useful Fully agree
Alle Verhandlungen und Somewhat useful Der Spatz in der Hand i Partially agree
Entweder, es gibt keine fVery useful Es muss aber zwingend Fully agree
Relatively transparent is Somewhat useful The Register is only helpPartially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful What do we know about Fully i agree
latively transparent
Transparency is good at EU level for most things, some free trade deals are notagree
Somewhat useful Fully being brokered transparently but are however
Everybody should be able No opinion I didn't even know of its No opinion
More work should be spent Veryinto
useful
integrating the EU citizens in the EU life Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful "en vue dinfluer sur l Fully agree
Although all the efforts Somewhat useful As stated before if two Disagree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
In einzelnen Fllen, z.B Very useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
La composicin de los grSomewhat useful Se debe exigir registrar Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
No opinion A mandatory lobby transp Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Disagree
ot transparent at all Very useful If you have nothing to h Fully agree
neexistuj jednoduch nNot useful at all ja prv krt poujem o r Disagree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful However, it needs greatePartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Image may be more at stSomewhat useful Transparency is but one Fully agree
Ich habe diese Antworto Somewhat useful Das bisherige Transparen Fully agree
A mandatory lobby transp Somewhat useful A lobby register should nFully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
1. Much more can and must be done to boost transparency.
ot transparent at all No opinion No opinion
2. A mandatory lobby transparency register must require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date inform
They
3. All EU decision-makers must be banned from meeting with unregisteredFully
mostly have marketi Somewhat useful It is useful if people w agreeand must oblige them to publish on-line lis
lobbyists
ot transparent4.atTrilogue
all talks, by which 90% of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behindagree
Somewhat useful Fully closed doors, must be made as the exception
latively transparent
5. Membership of expert Somewhat
and advisory useful
groups of the
1. The
Commission
existing lobby
must Partially
register
have fullis agreeflawedtoand
transparency
highly prevent
this consultation
privileged
The EU institutions have introduced some important transparency measures although transparency varies betweenaccess
must lead
them. and
The
6. Open data must be implemented Somewhat useful to ensure that2.EU A lobby
documents
registerand must
information
no
Fully longer
agree
are
be published
voluntary but on-line
mandatory
and made andeasily
legally avail
find
ot transparentLobby
at all register: As mentioned Very useful Partially agree
elsewhere there should be a legally-binding register, with comprehensive disclosure requiremen
ot transparentMuch
at all more can and mustNot beuseful
done to at boost transparency
all Partially agree
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date informa
Proactive meetings transparency:
latively transparent Somewhat Alluseful
EU institutions Theshould
idea ofmeet a register
only with
of Fully
lobbyists
registered
agreeand lobbyists,
their activities
lists ofas meetings
a tool toshould
bring transpa
be pro
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige them to publish online li
Le prsident
Trilogue de by
talks, la Commi
whichSomewhat
90% of EUuseful law is decided C'est la moiti du
in fast-track mode strict Fullyclosed
behind agree doors, must be made to the exception in
ot transparentOn-line
at all lists of
Membership of
meetings Very
expert and
should be held in a centralised,
useful
advisory groups of the
However,
The
Commission
searchable
existing
the present
lobby
must
database
register
Fully
register
have fullis
for
is deeply
each institution.
agree
transparency
highly
flawed and serious changes must res
flawedtoand prevent
this consultation
privileged access
must informa
lead
and to co
A mandatory
Much more lobby
can transparency
and must be register
done to should
boost require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing
transparency. accurate and up-to-date
Open
AllAEU data must be
decision-makers implemented
Somewhat
should to useful
ensure
be banned that EU
A lobby
documents
register andshould
information
no
Fullylonger agree
are be
published
voluntary online
but mandatory
and made and
easily
legally
available
find
Trilogues: Theselobby
mandatory informal
transparency registerfrom
inter-institutional meeting
meetings
shouldA lobby
require with
between all unregistered
register thewhich
EU European
lobbyistsis nolobbyists
toParliament,
longer
register,and should
voluntary, oblige
the Council
disclosing but ofthem
which
accurate theisandto up-to-date
publish
European
backed online
by Union
the force
an
infor li
In the public's
Trilogue percepti
talks, by which Somewhat
90% of EU useful
law is decidedIn
The and
in of itself
existing
fast-track itmode
lobby is not u Disagree
register
behind is closed
highly flawed
doors, must
and this
be consultation
made to the exception
must lead in
to
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige them to publish online
There
Access istoprobably
Membership
Trilogue talks, some
of expert
documents: tVery
and
Reforms
by which useful
advisory
90% groups
toofbring
EU the of
law theAs
Access
is ACommission
decidedlobby
to register
a result,
Documents a must
in fast-track should
haveno
commitment Fully
regulation
mode fulllonger
behind agree
transparency
to1049/2001
start be voluntary
intotoline
negotiating
closed doors, prevent
abut
mustwith mandatory
privileged
legally-binding
bethe
madeTreaty and
access
of legally
lobby
the Lisbon andfind
register
exception by co
w
in
Open data must be implemented
Somewhat to useful
ensure
Membership of expert and advisory groups of theThe that EU documents
Commission and
existing lobby information
Fully
must register
have fullis agree
are published
transparency
highly flawed,toonline
not andprivileged
prevent
easy made
to easily
navigate toavailable
accessfind and
ap
European
Open data Ombudsman: Somewhat
All European
must be implemented useful
to Ombudsman
ensure thatInEU the
decisions
A meantime,
lobby
documents on transparency
register before
and
should Fully
a nolegally-binding
information should
agree
longerarebe be binding
lobby online
published
voluntary register
for
butEU institutions.
is introduced,
mandatory
and madeandeasily it availa
will bb
legally
Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
All lobbyists MUST be r Somewhat useful The general idea is fine Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
ot transparentThe
at allEU
Much is still to be donehave
institutions toNot useful
boost at all
transparency.
introduced someA lobby register should
important bePartially
mandatory
transparency agree and legallyalthough
measures binding. It should require al
Fast-track
transparency decisions
varies behindSomewhat
closed
between them.doors
useful
Much more can and must be done to boost transparency should
There be
A commitment
isan exception
much toand
start
that notnegotiating
could Fully
the rule
agree
be asa it
legally
happens
improved binding
today.lobby
across An open
register
the EUdata
should
policybemu
institutions in
closed doors and only Somewhat
well-resourced
useful lobbies
Thepresentregisterishig
have access Fully
to trilogue
agree documents.
There should be a ban on any private meetings by all MEP's and lobby group The publication of a
ot transparent atAallmandatory lobby transparency Somewhat register
useful should Allrequire shouldNo
all EU lobbyists
such meetings to opinion
be register,
in a public disclosing
arena. accurate and up-to-date infor
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent atAllallEU decision-makers should
Very useful be banned from meeting with unregistered Fully lobbyists
agree and should oblige them to publish online
ot transparent at all Very useful Disagree
ot transparent atTrilogue talks, by which Very90% of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behind closed doors, must be made to the exception
all useful Fully agree
Much more can and must be done to boost The existing lobby register is highly flawed and this consultation must lead
transparency
EUMembership
decision-makers shoul Somewhat useful TheCommission
existing lobby registPartially agree
A mandatory of expert
lobby and advisory
transparency groups
register of the
should must
require all EU lobbyists havetofull transparency
register, disclosing to prevent
accurateprivileged accessinfor
and up-to-date and
how many online petitio Somewhat useful A lobby register should Disagree
no longer be voluntary but mandatory and legally fi
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige them to publish online
ot transparent atTrilogue
all datatalks,
Open mustbybewhich Very90%
useful
implemented to ensure that EU documents and Fully
information agreeare published
of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behind closed doors, must be made to the exception online and made easily availa
Membership of expert Somewhat and advisory useful
groups of theThe Commission
existing lobby
must register
haveFully agree
fullis transparency
highly flawedtoand prevent
this consultation
privileged access
must leadand
DaOpen
sie Treffen
data must mit nich Somewhat useful
be implemented to ensure thatDas EU Lobbyregister
A lobby
documents
register andist information
shoulddeFully agree
no longer arebe published
voluntaryonline but mandatory
and madeand easily
legally
availa fi
Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Somewhat useful. Partially agree
ot transparentMuch
at all more can and mustSomewhat useful
be done to boost transparency Fully agree
ot transparentAatmandatory
all Very useful
lobby transparency register should requireThe existing
all EUlobby
lobbyists toPartially
register register,
is highly agree
disclosing
flawed and accurate
this consultation
and up-to-date
must informa
lead to
All EU decision-makers should Somewhatbe banned
useful from meeting with unregisteredFully lobbyists agreeand should oblige them to publish online li
ot transparent at all Not useful at all A register does not stop Disagree
Take the example of Elma Somewhat useful Its usefulness must be shDisagree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Even if a lobbyist is on Partially agree
This is impossible to as Somewhat useful Fully agree
Somewhat useful Fully agree
The lack of transparencySomewhat useful If the Register does not Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterFully agree
The EP looks more transparent, and it could not be otherwise. The Commission and the Council should be transparent... So, m
latively transparent Very useful We believe the Transparen Fully agree
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date informa
Meetings with big busineVery
All EU decision-makers shoulduseful
be banned from meeting with unregisteredNo opinionand should oblige them to publish online li
lobbyists
latively transparent Very useful We believe
Trilogue talks, by which 90% of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behind closed the Transparen Fully agree doors, must be made to the exception in
Es wird Lobbyarbeit
Membership of expertnurandVery useful groups of theThe
advisory Commission
existing lobby have Fully
must register agree flawedtoand
fullistransparency
highly prevent
this consultation
privileged access
must lead
and to co
Open data must be implemented Somewhat to useful
ensure that EU A lobby
documents
registerandshould
information
noFully
longer agree
arebe published
voluntaryonline but mandatory
and madeand easily
legally
available
find
ot transparent at all Not useful at all Wer bestimmt, wer im TraPartially agree
Trilogue talks, by whi Very useful A lobby register should nFully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Das TranzparenzregisterPartially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparentMuch
at all more can and mustVery be done
usefulto boost transparency Fully agree
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date informa
the EUROGROUP
All They
EU decision-makers meets Somewhat
in useful
shouldtransparent
be bannedalthoughfrom meeting Disagree
a) are at best minimally manywith wouldunregistered lobbyists at
say not transparent and all.should oblige them to publish online li
viel zu undurchsichtig
Trilogue talks, by which duVery
90%useful
of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behind Fullyclosedagree doors, must be made to the exception in
b) See b) above.
ot transparentMembership
c)atThere
all should of expert
beand andVery
a mandatory useful
advisory groups oflobbyists
transparent theThe
Commission
The existing
register lobby
existing mustany
lobby
with register
have
register Fully
fullis
fraud agree
transparency
highly
isbeing
highly flawed
made
flawed toand
prevent
illegal,
and this
this
which consultation
privileged
consultation access
carry heavy must
must lead
and to
sanctions.
lead co
to
Much more can must be done to boost transparency
Open
d) data
Trilogue must be
talks, implemented
bymust
whichSomewhat to useful
ensure that EU
A lobby
documents
registerandshould
information
noFully
longer agree
are be
published
voluntary online
but mandatory
and made and
easily
legally
available
find
MuchA mandatory
more can lobby
and be90%doneofto
transparency EU law is
register
boost decided
should A lobby in fast-track
require
transparency register
all EU should
mode no
lobbyists behind
tolonger closed
register,be voluntary
doors, must
disclosing but mandatory
be made
accurate andto and
be legally
the except
up-to-date find
infor
eg
e) TTIP
Open
All EU they
data do what
must
decision-makersbe th Very useful
implemented
should be to ensure
banned that
from EU
meetingdocuments
with and
unregistered Partially
information lobbyistsagree
are published
and should online
oblige and
themmade
to easily
publish availa
online
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date informa
AllTrilogue talks, by which
EU decision-makers Somewhat
90%
should useful
beofbanned
EU lawfrom
is decided
meeting in with
fast-track mode behind
unregistered Fully
lobbyists agree
closed
anddoors,
shouldmust obligebethem
madetotopublish
the exception
online li
ot transparentTrilogue
atMembership
all talks, ofbyexpert Very
which and useful
90%advisory
of EU law groups of the
is decided he in existing
Commission lobby
fast-track must
moderegister
haveFully
behind is full agree
highlytransparency
closed flawed
doors,and tothis
must prevent
beconsultation
madeprivileged
to themustaccess
lead and
exception toins
Open dataof
Membership must be implemented
expert andSomewhat
advisory useful
to ensure
groups thatThe
of the ACommission
EUlobby
documents
register
existing lobby
mustshould
and information
no
register
have Fully
fulllonger agreeare
beflawed
istransparency
highly voluntary
published
toand but
online
thismandatory
prevent and made
consultation
privileged andeasily
legally
access
must availa
lead
andfind
to
co
Open data must be implemented Somewhat to useful
ensure that EU A lobby
documents
registerandshould
information
noFully
longer agree
arebe published
voluntaryonline but mandatory
and madeand easily
legally
available
bind
Open data must be impleSomewhat useful The existing lobby regis Fully agree
Die EU-Brger werdern iVery useful Die Beeinflussung von En Disagree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
There is a general feeli Somewhat useful The lobby register shouldFully agree
ot transparentMuch
at all more can and mustSomewhat be done touseful boost transparency including havingPartially a mandatory agreelobby transparency register that would
All EU decision-makers s
Somewhat useful The existing lobby regis Fully
Trilogue talks, by which 90% of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behind closed doors, must be scrapped. There must be agree
ot transparentMembership
at all of expert and Somewhat
advisory useful
groups of thebetter Commissionthan nothing must have but Fully agree
full transparency to prevent privileged access and co
Open data must be implemented Somewhat to useful
ensure that EU It isdocuments
somewhatand usefulinformation
butFully agreeare published online and made easily available
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
Open data must be impleSomewhat useful A lobby register should nFully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all No opinion Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
Much more canabsoluti
undemokratisch, and must be doneuseful
Somewhat to boost transparency
Das Register kann nur ePartially agree
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date infor
ot transparentThe
at all level isVery useful Fully agree
Alltransparency
EU decision-makers not the
should same
be banned through themeeting
from EU Institutions.
with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige them to publish online
The European
Trilogue Parliament
talks, by which Very
is90%
highly
useful
of transparent;
EU law is decided the EUinCommission
fast-track mode relatively
Fullytransparent
behind agree
closed doors,and must
the Council
be made nottotransparent
the exception at a
aufMembership
meine Anfragen in f Very useful
of expert and advisory groups of theThe Commission
existing lobby must registerFully agree
have fullistransparency
highly flawedtoand prevent
this consultation
privileged access
must leadand
latively transparent
Open data must be implemented Somewhat useful to ensure that EU A lobby
documentsregister andshould Fully
information agree
no longer arebepublished
voluntaryonline
but mandatory
and madeand easilylegally
availab
Somewhat useful
Die Kommunen begren die beachtlichen Anstrengungen der EU-Institutionen zur Fully agree
ot transparentSicherstellung
at all von mehr Somewhat
Transparenz. useful
Positiv hervorzuheben sind hier z. B. Partially
die agree
ghly transparent
grundstzlich recht gute Very useful von Dokumenten, das amtliche
Verfgbarkeit Fully agree
ot transparentMuch
at all more der
Verzeichnis canEU and(Who must isbe doneund
Who)
Somewhat to boost
useful transparency
die Information If it isber
not aTreffen
mandatory der No opinion
A
atmandatory lobby transparency register Dieshould require all
derEU lobbyists to register, desdisclosing
Registersaccurate and up-to-date inform
ot transparenthochrangigen
all Kommissionsmitarbeiter.
Very useful Bemhungen
Die Zielrichtung EU-Brgerbeauftragten,
und Funktionen
Fully agree zur Regulierung der Lobbyarb
All EU decision-makers
auf mehr Transparenz u.Somewhat should be banned
a. bei der from meeting
Zusammensetzung sind with unregistered
grundstzlich
von als eher lobbyists
ntzlich and should oblige
einzustufen. Das them to publish
Register mit all online
den
Trilogue talks, by which 90% useful Fully closed
agree doors, must be made to the exception in
Sachverstndigengruppen, denof EU law is decided
TTIP-Verhandlungen inund
Behrden fast-track
den modeVerbnden
behind
undTrilogverhandlungen
ihren zu berfrachten, die Teil des
latively transparent
Membership of expert Somewhat
and zu advisory useful
groups of theThe
Commission
existing lobby
mustIhre
registerFully agree
have fullistransparency
highly flawed
hinzuwirken, sind ebenfalls betonen. Zustzlich Multi-Level-Governance-Systems
sollten im Portal sind und toand
prevent
sich this consultation
privilegedmit
entsprechend access
must
den leadand toc
Open
Die data
Kommunen must be
begren Very
implemented
die useful to ensure
beachtlichen
Stimme in Europa (http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/index_de.htm) that EU
A
Anstrengungenlobby
documentsregister
der
EU-Institutionenalle and
should
EU-Institutionen
abstimmen, Fully
information
no
Formen von agree
longerare
zur be
published
voluntaryonline
but mandatory
and made
ist jedoch nicht zweckdienlich. Vor diesem and
easily
legally
availab
find
Sicherstellung
Konsultationenvon mehr Somewhat
aufgefhrt Transparenz.
werden. So useful
Positivauch
wren hervorzuheben
Hintergrund sind
gezielte Konsultationen
ist eshier Fully
z. B.
wichtig, dieagree
dass sich das Transparenzregister nicht hin zum
Much more Interessentrger
grundstzlich
bestimmter can andgute
recht mustSomewhat
b unter Angabe
Verfgbarkeit useful
von Dokumenten, The existing das
des Konsultationsdatums
einzigen lobby registFully
amtliche
E-Mail-Verteiler agree
der EU-Institutionen fr die Einbindung der
ot transparentVerzeichnis
at all der EU (Who
(Treffen/Einreichfrist), des isKonsultationsthemas,
Very Who)
usefulund die Information des ber Treffen der
unterschiedlichsten
Konsultationsdokuments AkteureFullyentwickelt.
agree Wichtig ist zudem, dass Vertreter
ot transparenthochrangigen
und
at all Kommissionsmitarbeiter.
der eingeladenen/angeschriebenen
Very useful Die Bemhungen
Interessentrger-Kategorien
ffentlicher derBehrden
EU-Brgerbeauftragten,
zuund ihrer
Fully Verbnde weiterhin auch auerhalb des
agree
ot transparentauf mehr Transparenz
verffentlichen.
at all Dies wrde u.Somewhat
a. bei der Zusammensetzung
zu mehr TransparenzDie
useful Zielrichtung
von
Transparenz-Register-Systems
fhren. Vor allem und Funktionen
htten die agree
Fully desMglichkeit
die Registers zur Regulierung
haben, der Lobbyarb
einen Zugangsauswei
Sachverstndigengruppen,
Interessentrger einen berblick, den TTIP-Verhandlungen
inwieweit sie bei sind
denden und
grundstzlich
den Trilogverhandlungen
EU-Institutionen
Konsultationen, alszueher
die ntzlich einzustufen.
beantragen. Darber hinaus Das ist
Register
es unser mitAnliegen,
all den da
Pregledno delovanje evro Somewhat useful Javni nadzor je uinkovitFully agree
hinzuwirken, sind ebenfallsoffen
nicht fr die Allgemeinheit zu betonen. Zustzlich
stehen, eingebunden Behrden
6 sollten
werden.imundPortal
Imihren Ihre
Verbnden zu berfrachten, die Teil des
Portal
ot transparentStimme
at all in
knnten imEuropa
Nachgang Very
ggf. useful
(http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/index_de.htm)
diesbezgliche DokumenteMulti-Level-Governance-Systems
Konsultationsbeitrge
hochgeladen alle werden.
Formen
vonPartially
von agree
ffentlichen
Ferner sind und sich entsprechend
Behrden und Verbnden mit den
unabhng
ot transparentKonsultationen
at all
sollten die Verhandlungen Very
aufgefhrt werden. useful
ber die So wren auch
Ausgestaltung EU-Institutionen
gezielte
davon,
des knftigen
ob sieKonsultationen
abstimmen,
freiwillig Fully
im Register agree
ist jedoch nicht zweckdienlich.
eingetragen sind in einer Voreigenen
diesem
Mandatory
bestimmter lobby
Transparenz-Registers register
Interessentrger Somewhat
ffentlich useful des
unterstattfinden.
Angabe Very
Auerdem limited.
Konsultationsdatums
Hintergrund
Kategorie ist noch Should
ist es
verffentlicht be
wichtig,
nicht sehr mFully
dass
werden, agree
sich das Transparenzregister
die somit nicht hin zum
auch der Zahl der vertretenen
Die richtige Antwort:
(Treffen/Einreichfrist),
transparent, "verhltnismig
des
wie Konsultationsbeitrge
Somewhat intransparent"
Konsultationsthemas,
gewichtet des
useful kann
einzigen
Brger
werden. man hier trgt.
Konsultationsdokuments
E-Mail-Verteiler
Rechnung leider Fully
nicht geben.
der EU-Institutionen
agree fr die Einbindung der
Kurzum
ot transparentund
at all es muss viel gemacht
der eingeladenen/angeschriebenen werden, um
Very useful die Transparenz
Interessentrger-Kategorien
unterschiedlichstenzu erhhen. Akteure
zu Fullyentwickelt.
agree Wichtig ist zudem, dass Vertreter
Offenlegung
verffentlichen. derDies
Treffen mit zu
wrde Lobbyisten
mehr fr die 30,000
Transparenz Beamten.
ffentlicher
fhren. Vor Behrden
allem htten
und die
ihrer Verbnde weiterhin auch auerhalb des
TTIP und CETA Verhandlu Very useful Mit jedem Berater steig Fully agree
Interessentrger einen berblick, inwieweit sie bei Transparenz-Register-Systems
den Konsultationen, die die Mglichkeit haben, einen Zugangsauswei
ot transparentDie
at all drfen nichtVery useful Fully agree
nichtGesetze
fr die Allgemeinheit hinter
offen verschlossenen
stehen, eingebunden Tren mit Interessenvertretern
den EU-Institutionen
werden. Im Portal zu beantragen. ausgehandelt
Darberwerden.
hinaus istDieesZwischenergebnisse
unser Anliegen, da
latively transparent
knnten im Nachgang No
ggf. opinion
diesbezgliche DokumenteKonsultationsbeitrge
hochgeladen werden.
vonPartially agreeBehrden und Verbnden unabhng
ffentlichen
Ferner
ot transparentMuch more can and mustVery be done to boost transparency
at all
Die Brger
sollten mssen
die Verhandlungen ber das beruseful
Netz
die leichte Einsichtsmglichkeiten
Ausgestaltung Lobbyregister
davon,
des knftigen
ob EU sindin die
sie lobbyists
freiwillig im Fully agree
verpflichtend
Informationen zudisclosing
erstellen.
und EU-Dokumente
Alle EU-Lobbyisten
haben. haben sich
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all to Register
register, eingetragen sind
accurate in einer
and eigenen
up-to-date informa
Transparenz-Registers Somewhat
ffentlich useful
stattfinden. Auerdem
Kategorie ist noch
verffentlicht
nicht sehr Fully
werden,
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige them to publish online li agreedie somit auch der Zahl der vertretenen
transparent,
Trilogue wieby
talks, Konsultationsbeitrge
whichSomewhat
90% of EUuseful lawgewichtet
is decided Brger
werden. Rechnung
in fast-track mode trgt. Fullyclosed
behind agree doors, must be made to the exception in
ot transparentMembership
at all of expert and Somewhat
advisory useful
groups of theThe Commission
existing lobby have Fully
must register agree flawedtoand
fullistransparency
highly prevent
this consultation
privileged access
must leadand to
co
Open data must be implemented Somewhat to useful
ensure that EU A lobby
documentsregister and should
information
noFully
longer
agree
arebe published
voluntaryonline
but mandatory
and madeand easily
legally
available
find
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful C'tait vraiment pour encPartially agree
Als Brger findet man n Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparentMuch
at all more can and mustVery be done
usefulto boost transparency Fully agree
A mandatory
Much more lobby
can and transparency
must be doneregister
to boost should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date informa
transparency
De
All gang
EU van zaken rondshould
decision-makers Very useful
beregister
bannedshould from meeting with unregistered Partially agree
A mandatory lobby transparency require all EU lobbyists to lobbyists and shouldaccurate
register, disclosing oblige them to publish online
and up-to-date informa li
latively transparent
Trilogue talks, by whichshould Somewhat
90% of useful Partially agree
All EU decision-makers beEU law isfrom
banned decided
meetingin fast-track mode behind
with unregistered closed
lobbyists doors,
and must
should be made
oblige themtotothe exception
publish onlineinli
ot transparentMembership
at all
Trilogue of expert
talks, by which andNot
90% useful
of EUat
advisory all is decided
groups
law Lobbyist
of theTheCommission
inexistingshould
fast-track lobby
must beforbi
mode register
have Disagree
behindfullistransparency
highly flawed
closed doors,tomust
and
prevent
this
be consultation
privileged
made to theaccess
must lead
exception andin
to
co
Open data must be implemented
Somewhat to
Membership of expert and advisory groups of theThe useful
ensure that EUA lobby
documents
Commission register
existing lobby and should
information
must register noFully
longer
agree
are
have fullistransparencybe
published
voluntary
highly flawedtoand online
but
prevent mandatory
and made
this consultation and
easily
privileged access legally
available
must lead find
and to
co
Das
OpenTransparenzregister
data must be implemented Somewhat
s to useful
ensure that EU Das
A lobby Transparenzregister
documentsregister and should Fully
information
no s longer
agree
arebe published
voluntaryonline
but mandatory
and madeand easily
legally
available
find
Somewhat useful Fully agree
Konsultationen aufgefhrt werden. So wren auch EU-Institutionen
gezielte Konsultationen
abstimmen, ist jedoch nicht zweckdienlich. Vor diesem
bestimmter Interessentrger unter Angabe des KonsultationsdatumsHintergrund ist es wichtig, dass sich das Transparenzregister nicht hin zum
(Treffen/Einreichfrist), des Konsultationsthemas, des einzigen
Konsultationsdokuments
E-Mail-Verteiler der EU-Institutionen fr die Einbindung der
und der eingeladenen/angeschriebenen Interessentrger-Kategorienunterschiedlichsten Akteure zu entwickelt. Wichtig ist zudem, dass Vertreter
Much more can Dies
verffentlichen. and must
wrdebezudone mehrtoTransparenz
boost transparency
ffentlicher
fhren. VorBehrden
allem htten unddie ihrer Verbnde weiterhin auch auerhalb des
A mandatory lobby
Interessentrger transparency
einen berblick,register
inwieweit should require
sie bei all EU lobbyistsdie
Transparenz-Register-Systems
den Konsultationen, to register, diedisclosing
Mglichkeit accurate
haben,and einenup-to-date informa
Zugangsauswei
All EUfr
nicht decision-makers
die Allgemeinheit should
offenbe banned
stehen, from meeting
eingebunden with unregistered
den EU-Institutionen
werden. Im Portal lobbyists and
zu beantragen. shouldhinaus
Darber oblige ist
themes to publish
unser onlineda
Anliegen, li
Il reste beaucoup
Trilogue
knnten imtalks, bywhich
Nachgang fairggf.
Very
90% useful
of EU law isDokumente
diesbezgliche decidedL'inscription
in fast-track surmode
Konsultationsbeitrge
hochgeladen le regist
werden.
von Fully
behind agree doors,
closed
ffentlichen
Ferner must be
Behrden undmade the exception
Verbnden in de
unabhng
The lobbying
Membership
sollten ofmade theand
expert
die Verhandlungen Not useful
ber die at
advisory all
groups
Ausgestaltung Lobbying
of theThe
davon, obshould
Commission
desexisting sielobby
knftigen must beregister
stopp
have
freiwillig imD isagree
full istransparency
highlyeingetragen
Register flawedtoandprevent
this consultation
sind privileged access
must lead
in einer eigenen and to co
Open data must be implemented
Transparenz-Registers Somewhat
ffentlich to useful
ensure that
stattfinden. EU
A lobby
Auerdemdocuments
Kategorie register
ist noch andshould
information
verffentlicht
nicht sehrnoFully
longer
werden, agree
are be
diepublished
voluntary
somit auchonline
but
der mandatory
and
Zahl
Grundstzlich halten wir das EU-Transparenzregister fr ein eher ntzliches I made
der and
easily
legally
available
vertretenen find
transparent, wie Konsultationsbeitrge
Somewhat useful gewichtet Brger
werden.
In Rechnung
der heutigen Formtrgt.
sind Fully agree groe europische Interessenvertreter u
allerdings
Prinzipiell agieren eur Somewhat useful Disagree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
Les ngociations en couNot useful at all L'exactitude des donnesPartially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful No opinion
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Wir als Kommune begre Somewhat useful Grundstzlich wird die Z Fully agree
Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Far more needs to be don Somewhat useful Das Transparenzregister
Inclusion in the registe Fully ist schlecht
agree durchdacht. Es enthlt Ausnahmen fr g
/Regionalverbnde unter diese Kategorie fallen. Tatschlich finden sich dort v
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful von Lobbybudgets scheint Partially
- wennagreeman Berichten einschlgiger Transparenz-
Es sollte mehr fr Trans Somewhat useful Das Lobbyregister sollte Fully agree
Beispielsweise sind die VSomewhat useful Es beginnt langsam ntzPartially agree
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all Disagree
latively transparent Somewhat useful per essere pi utile dov Fully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
The Council is not transpVery useful Fully agree
De puissants lobbys sontVery useful Das bestehende RegisterFully agree
ist sehr fehlerhaft und muss ernsthaft verbessert w
Hier muss viel mehr get Somewhat useful Ein Register
Das sollte nicht freiwillig
Transparenzregister Fully agree
ist schlecht sondern verpflichtend
durchdacht. und rechtlich
Es enthlt Ausnahmen bindendfr g
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all von Lobbybudgets scheint Disagree
- wenn man Berichten einschlgiger Transparenz-
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Die Entscheidungsprozes Somewhat useful Das bestehende RegisterFully agree
Die Mitgliedschaft in E Somewhat useful Das Lobbyregister sollte Fully agree
Much
Much more
more can
can and
and must be
be done
mustSomewhatdone to boost
boost transparency
touseful transparency.
latively transparent Partially agree
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date informa
Warum
All werden der ffent
EU decision-makers Very useful
should beregister
bannedshould Sehr ntzlich,
from meeting with wenn a l Partially
unregistered lobbyists agree
and shouldaccurate
be obliged toup-to-date
publish online lis
A
In mandatory
den
latively transparent lobby transparency
vergangenen Jahren haben
Somewhat die europischen
useful require all EU
Institutionen lobbyists
wichtige toFully
register,
Schritteagree disclosing
zur Verbesserung derand
Transparenz informa
gesetzt
Trilogue talks, by which 90% of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behind closed doors,
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should oblige them to publish online li must be made to the exception in
latively transparent
Membership of expert and Somewhat
advisory useful
groups of theThe Commission
existing lobby have Fully
must register agree flawedtoand
fullistransparency
highly prevent
this consultation
privileged access
must lead
and to co
Lobbyregister:
Open data must Die
be BAK tritt
implementedfr eintoverbindliches
Somewhat useful
ensure that Lobbyregister
Ein
EU
A verpflichtendes
lobby
documents
register mit
and weitgehenden
shouldLobbyregister
information
noFully
longer Offenlegungspflichten
agree
are stellt
be einenonline
published
voluntary wichtigen
but ein.
Bestandteil
mandatory
and madeDas Register
and
easily zur
legallySchaf
brau
available
bind
Trilogue talks, by which 90% of EU law is decided Das in Transparenzregister
fast-track mode behind ist schlecht durchdacht.
closed doors, must be Esmade
enthltto Ausnahmen
the exceptionfring
In groen Teilen
Membership of arbeitand
expert Notadvisory
useful at all
groups of thevon
Das
The Lobbybudgets
Transparenzregister
Commission
existing lobby
must scheint
register
have Disagree
ist
full -isschlecht
wenn man
transparency
highly Berichten
durchdacht.
flawed to
and
preventeinschlgiger
Es
this enthlt
consultation
privileged Transparenz-
Ausnahmen frtog
ExpertInnengruppen: Um mehr Transparenz berNur die ein
Arbeit
verpflichtendes
der ExpertInnengruppen
Transparenzregister zu schaffen,
kannsind
dafr sorgen,access
mustregelm
verpflichtende,
dass lead
and
auch wco
latively transparent Not useful at all von Lobbybudgets scheint Disagree
- wenn man Berichten einschlgiger Transparenz-
Die europischen Institutionen haben mittlerweile auf den von verschiedenen Seiten geuerten Vorwurf der Intransparenz re
Open data must be
Verffentlichung vonimplemented
Somewhat
Terminen: Wieto useful
ensure that EU
bereits zuvor A
Dielobby
documents
angefhrt,register
Entsendung and
fordert should
voninformation
die noFully
Personen
BAK longeragree
eineare bepublished
voluntaryonline
inOffenlegung but Termine
ExpertInnengremien
aller mandatory
anddermadederand
easily
legally
available
EU-Kommission
europischen findm
latively transparent Somewhat useful
Nicht zu Unrecht wird teilweise angemerkt, dass der DasZugang
bestehendezu gewissen Fully
RegisterDokumenten agree
ist ein ntzliches verbessert
Instrument.
werden Dieknnte.
BrgerDabei
Europas ist z.e
Trilog: Die informellen, inter-institutionellen
Very useful TreffenUmzwischen
die Eintragungen
Europischer in das
Fully
Kommission,
Register
agree aktuellEuropischem
zu halten,Parlament
sollte zweimal
und Europ
jhrlich
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all
Zur Transparenz gehrt nach Ansicht der Bayerischen Das Transparenzregister
Gleichzeitig
Staatsregierung
sollte das auch, Disagree
Transparenzregister
dass neben derauch grundstzlichen
nur die Organisationen
Zugangsmglic und
Nicht nur die Lobyisten mssen Somewhat alle useful
Daten offenlegen - auch die Institutionen Fullybrauchen
agree strenge Regeln, um die bermige B
Trilogue Gesprche im No Rahmen
opinion von Gesetzesnderungen
Die aktuellemssenVersion die desabsolute
Fully agree Ausnahme bleiben und die Gesprche live u
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially ist schlecht agreedurchdacht. Es enthlt Ausnahmen fr g
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all von Lobbybudgets scheint Disagree
- wenn man Berichten einschlgiger Transparenz-
Some institutions are moSomewhat useful The user interface doesn'Fully agree
Auswahl von ExpertengrSomewhat useful Ntzlich solange es fr Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful
Die angestrebte Transparenz ist positiv zu bewerten. Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful
Wnschenswert wre - neben den Bemhungen um mehr Transparenz bei Fully
der agree
Zusammensetzung von
latively transparent
Sachverstndigengruppen, Very useful
den TTIP-VerhandlungenDas und
Transparenzregister Fully
wird agree
den Trilogverhandlungen positiv
- auch
bewertet,
die Auffhrung
jedoch sollte
der es
Konsultationsfor
auch nicht mi
Die Verhandlungen ber Somewhat
die Ausgestaltung
useful des knftigen
Lokale Behrden,
Transparenzregisters
die TeilFully
des agree
Multi-Level-Governance-Systems
sollten ffentlich stattfinden. sind und sich
Institutions can be both Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
The Council is the least Somewhat useful Regulating is not the co Partially agree
They are relatively tran Very useful The Transparency Register Fully agree
Mai pot fi mult mbuntVery useful Mai trebuie promovat priPartially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful When the Commission liste Fully agree
there should be a categoVery useful Fully agree
They are transparent onlSomewhat useful The EU and the transpare Partially agree
Im Verhltnis zu nationa Somewhat useful Wer sich eine stndige VPartially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Transparency has certainVery useful it is a natural evolution Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
There is too much influe Very useful It should be easier to fi Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
The European InstitutionsSomewhat useful
are relatively transparent as regards to the accessFullytoagree
public documents and meetings. This has grea
However ECTAA deplores Very
thatuseful
access to certain documents or reports of specific
Fully agree
meetings is still limited, despite the lack of se
latively transparent Somewhat useful The transparency Registe Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
Say what you do and do Veryw useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
Our activities and contacVery useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
la trasparenza per tutti No opinion E' presumibile che la proPartially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Il n'y a aucune vrificat Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Muligt de er bne, men Very useful Fully agree
Somewhat useful No opinion
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
Transparenz ist anders!!Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Often the use of privacy Very useful It's surely a good impr Partially agree
Der dringende Verdacht Somewhat
latively transparent liegt nahe, dass
usefuldie Transparenz trotz Transparenzregister abnimmt, weil der politische Druck von Re
Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
VORSCHLAG:
latively transparent Very useful
Konstitutionelle Manahmen entwickeln und beschlieen, welche: Fully agree
The transparency of the Very useful My organisation, which i
1. die Integritt und die Unabhngigkeit der Mitarbeiter der Institutionen derPartially agree Union frdern; wie zum Beispiel Ein
Europischen
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Es abundante la informacDisagree
2. die Transparenz durch Erweiterung des Transparenzregisters verbessern, indem Einrichtungen wie zum Beispiel Kirchen un
Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
Please tell EU voters th Not useful at all Partially agree
Sie sind machtgeil, wolleVery useful Wenn Transparenzregister No opinion
Again: politicians (and Somewhat useful There are numerous organi Disagree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
I admit, that there are e Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
Would have liked option V oery useful Again openness and miniFully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful The ESNO's constituancies Fully agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
No opinion No opinion
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Not useful at all I don't believe these regiDisagree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Permettre des personnSomewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
While some of the EU institutions have introducedThe some present
transparency
register ismeasures,
flawed andthesignificant
scope varieschanges vastlymust between
resultthem. from this c
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
1) Lobby register: A legally-binding register should be put in place, and should include comprehensive disclosure requirements
latively transparent Very useful All EU institutions
2) Proactive meetings transparency: A legally should
mandated
only meet
lobby Fully
with
registeragree
registered
is essential
lobbyists,
if alllists
lobbyists
of meetings
are to should
sign-upbe anp
ghly transparent
3) Trilogues: These informal Veryinter-institutional
useful meetings between the European Fully Parliament,
agree the Council of the European Union
ot transparent4)atAccess
all to documents:Very useful
Reforms to bring the Access
As a to result,
Documents
a commitment Fully
regulation agree
to start
1049/2001
negotiating
into line
a legally-binding
with the Treaty lobby
of Lisbon
register b
Somewhat useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Very useful Partially agree
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all Das TransparenzregisterDisagree
No opinion.
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Much more can and must be done to boost transparency
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date informa
latively transparent
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregisteredFully
Somewhat useful lobbyistsagreeand should be obliged to publish online lis
Draft documents are ofteVery useful
Trilogue talks, by which 90% of EU law is decided in fast-track mode behind closed Fully agree doors, must be made to the exception in
access
Membership
The to internal
EU institutions docu
of expert
have Somewhat
andintroduced useful
advisory groups
some important as
of theThe a consultant,
Commission
existing lobby
transparency this
must is
register
measures Partially
have fullisalthough agree
transparency
highly flawed toand
prevent
transparency thisvaries
consultation
privileged
between access
must lead
them. and to
Theco
Open data must be implemented Somewhat to useful
ensure that EU A lobby
documentsregister andshould
information
no
Fully
longer agree
arebepublished
voluntaryonline
but mandatory
and madeand easily legally
available
bind
Lobby
Trilogue register: As mentioned
discussions elsewhere there should be a legally-binding Fully
sh Very useful register, with comprehensive disclosure requiremen
agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
Proactive meetings transparency:
latively transparent All EU institutions
Theshould
idea ofonlya lobby
meetregister
withPartially
registered
as a tool lobbyists,
to bring transparency
lists of meetings to EU should
lobbyingbe prois
The EU institutions haveSomewhat introduced useful
some important transparency measures. agree
However, there is much that could be improved a
Most documents are in EVery useful Fully agree
Trilogues: These informal inter-institutional meetings A lobbybetween
register
thewhich
European
is noParliament,
longer voluntary, the Council
but which of theis European
backed by Union the forcean
Lobby register: As mentioned elsewhere
Somewhat usefulthere should be a legally-binding
The register must be maFully register with comprehensive disclosure requirement
agree
Die europischen
Access to documents: InstitReforms
Somewhat useful
to bring the Access Das
As a Transparenzregister
to result,
Documents a commitment
regulationPartially
startagree
to1049/2001 negotiating
into linea with
legally-binding
the Treaty of lobby
Lisbonregister
by w
Proactive
Of course meetings
! ... Theretransparency:
is Very useful All EU institutions
CEO should
has long-supported
only meet withFully the
registered
idea
agree of lobbyists
a lobby register
(or those aswho
a toolfalltounder
bring the transp
thre
European Ombudsman: Somewhat All European useful
Ombudsman In the
decisions
meantime,on transparency
before Fully
a legally-binding
should
agree be bindinglobby register
for EU institutions.
is introduced, it will b
Tobacco lobby: All organisations signed up to the For WHOs CEO, FCTC
a lobbyshould
register
make which
sureisitsno policies
longerand voluntary,
practices but are
which fullyiscompliant
backed b
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
The volume
Trilogues: and technicit
These informalSinter-institutional
omewhat useful meetings As abetween
result, we thewish
European
to seeFully agree
Parliament,
a commitment thetoCouncil
start negotiating
of the Europeana legally-bindin
Union an
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
TTIP: The European Commission Somewhatshould
usefulfollow theIn the
European
meantime,Ombudsmans
before Fully
a legally-binding
recommendations
agree lobbyand register
provideis introduced,
full transparency it will b
notMuch moretransparent
so much can and must be doneuseful
Somewhat to boost transparency Partially agree
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to register, disclosing accurate and up-to-date infor
Il Registro funziona beni Very useful E' utile soprattutto per Fully agree
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered lobbyists and should be obliged to publish online
ot transparent atTrilogue
all Somewhat useful
talks, by which 90% of EU law is decided Wouldinbe nice with
fast-track a betPartially
mode behind closed agreedoors, must be made to the exception
latively transparent
Membership of expert Somewhat useful Fully agree
Nekaj transparentnosti je,and
a eadvisory
zdale negroups of the
dovolj. The
Commission
Register existing
lobiranjalobby
must register
have
je zelo fullistransparency
pomemben, highly vendar
flawedtopa
and prevent
bo this consultation
privileged
potrebno sedanji access
must lead
and
register
The issuedata
Open is more
mustthe
be cimplemented
Somewhat useful
to ensure that EU A lobby
documents
register and
should Fully
information agree
no longer arebe published
voluntaryonline
but mandatory
and madeand easily legally
availa b
Somewhat useful
Vse evropske institucije naj se smejo sestajati le zVpisovanje registriranimi v register
lobisti.ne Fully
Seznam
more biti agree
vsehnasestankov
prostovoljni moraosnovi,
biti javno
ampak dostopen.
je potrebno z
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Who knowskion
Odloitve, jih which
evropskibasis
Somewhat useful pravic sprejme
varuh lovekovih If I feel that
Razpravo my concernobveznem
o otransparentnosti,
zakonsko Disagree
morajo registriranju
biti zavezujoelobistineza vse aktivnosti
evropske je institucije
treba za
Somewhat useful Fully agree
fucking jewish conspiracyNot useful at all fucking jewish conspiracyFully agree
established feature of EU decision-making,
bestimmter Interessentrger unter Angabe des but Konsultationsdatums
often
needed.undermine
einzigen accountability
E-Mail-Verteiler and
der EU-Institutionen fr die Einbindung der
Stimme in Europa
transparency of the(http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/index_de.htm)
EUdes legislative EU-Institutionen
process. Very little
A lobby register alle
information abstimmen,
is
which Formen
available
is no to von
istthe
longer jedoch
public nicht zweckdienlich.
voluntary, butistwhich Vor diesem
is backed by the force
(Treffen/Einreichfrist), Konsultationsthemas, des
unterschiedlichsten
Konsultationsdokuments Akteure entwickelt. Wichtig zudem, dass Vertreter
Konsultationen
because these aufgefhrttake
meetings werden.
place So wrenclosed
behind auch Hintergrund
gezielte
essential
doors andif Konsultationen
istlobbyists
all
only eswell-resourced
wichtig, dass sich das Transparenzregister nicht hindata zum
und der eingeladenen/angeschriebenen Interessentrger-Kategorien ffentlicher Behrden zuund ihrer Verbnde weiterhin auch auerhalb des wh
are to sign-up
lobbies and if the register is to contain
bestimmter
have access Interessentrger
to trilogue unter Angabe
documents. The des Konsultationsdatums
publicationeinzigen
an of
accurate
all E-Mail-Verteiler
documents
snapshot should
of derbeEU-Institutionen
lobbying required
in the EU fr die Einbindung
institutions so that der can se
citizens
verffentlichen. Dies wrde zu mehr TransparenzTransparenz-Register-Systems
fhren. Vor allem htten die die Mglichkeit haben, einen Zugangsauswei
(Treffen/Einreichfrist),
and in a timely and des Konsultationsthemas,
systematic manner. Furthermore, des
unterschiedlichsten
Konsultationsdokuments
influencing
there should beAkteure
EU decision-making,
public entwickelt.
access ontowhich Wichtig
issues, ist on
zudem,
whose dass Vertreter
behalf, and withda
Interessentrger einen berblick, inwieweit sie beidenden EU-Institutionen
Konsultationen, zudie beantragen. Darber hinaus ist es unser Anliegen,
und der
meetings, eingeladenen/angeschriebenen
and access to any reports Interessentrger-Kategorien
or notes ffentlicher
discussed
budgets. over the Behrden zu und ihrer Verbnde weiterhin auch auerhalb des
nicht fr die Allgemeinheit offen stehen, eingebunden Konsultationsbeitrge
werden. Im course
Portalvon of the process, Behrden
ffentlichen in und Verbnden unabhng
verffentlichen.
line
The with the
EU institutions Dies
procedures wrde
have for zu mehr
normal
introduced Transparenz
Parliament
some important Transparenz-Register-Systems
fhren.
committee
As a Vor
result, allem
meetings.
transparency a htten
commitment
measures dieto startdie
although Mglichkeit
negotiating
transparency a haben, einen
legally-binding Zugangsauswei
lobby register
knnten im Nachgang ggf. diesbezgliche Dokumentedavon, hochgeladen
ob sie freiwillig werden.
im Register
Fernereingetragen sindvaries between
in einer eigenenthem. The
Interessentrger
Access to einen Reforms
documents: berblick, to inwieweit
bring the sie bei
Access denden
placetoEU-Institutionen
Konsultationen,
Documents
by 2017. A zudie
regulation beantragen.
legally-binding 1049/2001
lobby Darber hinaus ist es unser Anliegen, da
sollten die Verhandlungen Very
ber useful
die AusgestaltungKategoriedes knftigen verffentlicht werden, Fully agree die somit auch der Zahl der vertretenen the o
register would give the authorities
nicht
into fr
line die
with Allgemeinheit
the Treaty of offen
Lisbon stehen,
by eingebunden
widening its 6
levy
scope werden.
fines
to Im
encompass
or other Portal
real allsanctions
EU institutions,
(including refusing to hold lobby meetings)
Lobby register: As mentioned
Transparenz-Registers elsewhere
ffentlich
Somewhat usefulthere
stattfinden. should
Auerdem
Brger beista noch
legally-binding
Rechnung nichttrgt. register,
sehrFullytransparent,
agree with comprehensive
wie Konsultationsbeitrge disclosure gewichtet
requiremen wo
knnten im Nachgang
bodies, offices
BUSINESSEUROPE and agenciesggf. diesbezgliche
believes currently
that the not Dokumente
covered
European Konsultationsbeitrge
refuse
are hochgeladen
to
to
institutions
The idea be
register
welcomed.
are or
quite werden.
on von
Such
those
transparent
of a lobby register asagree ffentlichen
Ferner
reforms
who andpost Behrden
inaccurate
acknowledges und Verbnden
information
the or
continuous
a tool to bring transparency to EU lobbying is
whounabhng
otherwi
efforts m
Die europischen
sollten Instit Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterFully
should die
Proactive Verhandlungen
recognise
meetings ber dieAll
thetransparency:
fundamental Ausgestaltung
nature
EU institutions davon,
of the right des
rules. ofknftigen
ob
Aaccess
should sie freiwillig
legally-binding
only tomeet im
information,
withlobbyRegister
and
register
registered toeingetragen
should belists
lobbyists, sind ofmeetings
introducedin einer eigenen
alongside
shouldabe clear
pro
latively transparent
Transparenz-Registers
ensure harm and public Somewhat
ffentlich
interest useful
stattfinden.
tests apply for Das
Auerdem
all Register
Kategorie ist
registration
exceptions. noch kann
verffentlicht
which nicht ntzl
sehr
clarifies Fully
werden,
what agreedie somit
constitutes auch der
lobbying Zahl
and der
whichvertretenen
contacts with
Transparency is also one of the key components A We
oflobby
anbelieve
effective thebetter
register Register
whichregulation
is is
nosomewhat
longer agenda. useful
voluntary, It in
isbut
essential
helping
whichto isthat
achieve
all stakeholders
backed thethe
by overall
force
individual
transparent,
European contacts and Very
wie Konsultationsbeitrge
Ombudsman: useful Ombudsman
gewichtet Brger
werden. Rechnung trgt. Fully should
agreelocal
Trilogues: These informalAllinter-institutional
European meetingsdo decisions
not eg.
between citizens
on
thetransparency
contacting
European their
Parliament, bethe MEP. Council of the European Union an
binding
In for EU institutions.
this context, Somewhat
we are pleased useful
that the Commission In the
However, meantime,
clearly the
supports before
register morealsoFully
a openness
As a result, a commitment to start negotiating agree
legally-binding
contains lobbya register
over-bureaucratic
and transparency, is introduced,
provisions,
not
legally-binding only lobby
during
and/oritthe
will
requ
register b
imp
Somewhat useful continue to introduce further
Fully incentives
agree
Access to documents: Reforms to bring the Access to Documents regulation 1049/2001 into line with the Treaty of Lisbon by w to encourage registration now.
We also call on the European SomewhatCommission
useful to publish Zur
In the Strkung
order
allmeantime,
public
to remedy der Transparenz
consultations
thesePartially
before andschlagen
aunintended all
agree
legally-binding new wir
effects, Reformen
proposals
lobby weregister
have des
immediately
made Transparenzregist
someafterconcrete
is introduced, their ado
it will bp
European Ombudsman: Somewhat All European useful
Ombudsman decisions on transparency Fully should
agree be binding for EU institutions.
Die Verstndlichkeit der Angaben im Register sollte dringend verbessert werd
unless continuous interesVery useful Partially agree
La prctica nos dice qu Very useful Die Vergleichbarkeit der Fully Datenagree im Register sollte dringend gestrkt werden. D
La prctica
Zur Strkung nosderdice qu Very useful
Transparenz und der Verlsslichkeit der Daten im Transparenzregister Fully agree sollten die EU-Institutionen ein integri
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Es ist sehr gut, dass die Somewhat EU-Institutionen
usefulviele ihrer DamitArbeitsunterlagen
Transparenzvorgaben ffentlich
FullySinn agree
zugnglich
machen,machen mssenund sie politische
fr alle Organisatione
Beratungen
La prctica nos dice qu Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Partially agree
La prctica nos dice qu Very useful Fully agree
La prctica nos dice qu Very useful Fully agree
La prctica nos dice qu Very useful Fully agree
the Juncker commission Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Oui le registre de tran Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful I dont see any regular c Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Fully agree
Difficult or impossible to Somewhat useful Fully agree
Die Europischen Institutionen
latively transparent Somewhat haben zwar einige wichtige Transparenzinstrumente
useful Partially agree eingefhrt, aber der Grad an Transparenz
1. Ein Schritt hierzu istSomewhat
latively transparent das verbindliche
useful Lobbyregister mit klaren Zugangsgrenzen, Partially agree Monitoring, Sanktionsmechanismen und
2. Auerdem drfen sich alle EU-Institutionen nur mit registrierten Lobbyisten
Fully agree und eine Liste der Treffen soll von der K
treffen
ghly transparent Very useful
3. Der Transparenz und Glaubwrdigkeit des EU-Gesetzgebungsprozesses wird oft durch die Trilog-Verhandlungen unterlau
The
4. Council of Ministers Very
Alle Entscheidungen des useful
Europischen Ombudsmanns mit Bezug zurFully agree
Transparenz sollten verbindlich fr alle EU-Institutio
Die Europischen Institutionen
Very haben
useful
5. Die Informationszugangs-Verordnung 1049/2001 zwar einige Thewichtige
1. Die objective
muss Transparenzinstrumente
Idee of improveFully
reformiert
eines Lobbyregisters
werden und agree an eingefhrt,
alsdie
Instrument, aberum
Errungenschaften derfrGrad anLissabon-Ver
Transparenz
des Transparenz
in der
1.
6. Ein
latively transparent Auch Schritt hierzu der
hinsichtlich istSomewhat
das verbindliche
laufenden useful Lobbyregister
Beschwerde- 2.undHierfrmit klarenmuss Zugangsgrenzen,Fully agree Monitoring,
Vertragsverletzungsverfahrenzeigt
das Lobbyregister rechtlich
sich die Sanktionsmechanismen
verbindlich
Europische (und Komission
nicht wie jetzt und
nichf
2.
7. Auerdem
Darber hinaus drfen sich
finden alle
Somewhat EU-Institutionen
zahlreiche useful
andere nicht nur mit registrierten
3. transparente
Die Vereinbarung Lobbyisten
Verhandlungen
hierfr
Fully und treffen
agree
durchersteund
die eine Liste der
Verhandlungen
Kommission Treffen
statt
fr ein soll von
wierechtlich
etwa der K
zu verbi
TTIP
3. Der Transparenz und Glaubwrdigkeit des EU-Gesetzgebungsprozesses wird oft durch die Trilog-Verhandlungen unterlau
The European institutionVery useful The Transparency Registe Partially agree
4. Alle Entscheidungen des Europischen Ombudsmanns mit Bezug zur Transparenz sollten verbindlich fr alle EU-Institutio
i.e.:
5. Commissioners and Very useful
Die Informationszugangs-Verordnung 1049/20011. Die muss Idee reformiert Fully und
eines Lobbyregisters
werden agree an alsdie
Instrument,
Errungenschaften um fr Transparenz
des Lissabon-Ver in der
latively transparent Somewhat useful
6. Auch hinsichtlich der laufenden Beschwerde-2.undHierfr Fully
Vertragsverletzungsverfahrenzeigt
muss das Lobbyregister agree rechtlich sich die verbindlich
Europische (und Komission
nicht wie jetzt nichf
latively transparent
7. Darber hinaus finden Somewhat
zahlreiche useful
andere nicht 3. transparente
Die Vereinbarung Verhandlungen Fully und
hierfr agree
durcherstedieVerhandlungen
Kommission statt fr ein
wierechtlich
etwa zu verbiTTIP
Somewhat useful Fully agree
Die europischen Institu Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterNo opinion
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful Disagree
Be objective, do nor relaNot useful at all U do what u feel is ok. RDisagree
latively transparent Somewhat useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
Sur tous les dossiers, le Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Somewhat useful No opinion
APRI develops its activit Very useful Fully agree
To improve transparency, we propose reforms of the Transparency Register i
The
Das comprehensibility of the information in the register should be improved in
ot transparent at all Somewhat useful TransparenzregisterFully agree
latively transparent
To strengthen the transparency Very useful
and reliability of data
The in comparability
the Transparency of the Partially
Register,
data in the agree
theregister
EU institutions
should beshould
strengthened.
provide an Unclear
integ
There is clearly a high l Somewhat useful This is certainly useful
There is significant room for improvement in the transparency of EU institutions. Firstly, Partially agreethe transparency register must be lega
Efforts
It is very
Certain are made
good
steps but
ofthat
thetheaccVery useful process
EU institutions
decision-making make manyhaveThe objectives
Inofserious
addition,
their the are
working EU sound
documents
transparency Fullyavailable
institutions
deficits, agree
should actively
to the Commission
in particular public
promoteandathatculture
political
Expert of
andcomplianc
consulta
Advisor
Somewhat useful
Lobbying is a booming growth industry in Brussels. EPHAEstimates
believes of that
how amany Fully
legally agreetransparency
lobbyists
biding address the EU register
institutions
would ingoBrussels
some way va
EPHA highlights that EU Very institutions
useful should be obliged
In ourto view,
implement
the Transparency
recommendations
Fully agree
Registerbyintends
the EUtoOmbudsman
ensure that andthe Union
withoutisdeop
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
ot transparent at all Very useful Partially agree
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all Das
Das TransparenzregisterDisagree
Transparenzregister kann grundstzlich als ntzliches Instrument zur Re
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all Das TransparenzregisterDisagree
Die Stadt Pforzheim begSomewhat useful Die Einbindung der lokalen, Fullyregionalen
agree und nationalen Belange durch ffentli
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all Das TransparenzregisterDisagree
Mehr Transparenz der EU Somewhat useful In den EU-Vertrgen ist Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful Fully agree
In groen Teilen arbeite Somewhat useful
In Transparency International's EU integrity reportThe Das TransparenzregisterPartially
(2014)
transparency
it is statedregister
that: ''(...)
is useful,agree
existing asEUit acknowledges
transparency rules the importance
are rendered of tran
me
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Transparency
The of theregister
idea of a lobby institutions
Somewhat
as ashould
tooluseful
to be an transparency
bring ongoing
A transparency
goal to forEUEUregister
policy makers.
lobbying on
Partially
isits own
very Aimportant.
agree
well
doesfunctioning
notChanges
enabletransparency
public
must scrutiny
resultregister
regarding
from can
this conb
A lobby register which is Somewhat
no longer voluntary,
useful but whichThe information
Das is mandatory,
Transparenzregisterabout
is essential
thFully agree
if all lobbyists
ist schlecht durchdacht.are Esto sign-up and if the registe
enthlt Ausnahmen fr g
In
Legroen
MEDEFTeilenestime arbeit
que lesNot useful at all
institutions europennes vonsontLobbybudgets
relativementscheint Disagree
- wenn man
transparentes Berichtenleurs
et reconnat einschlgiger Transparenz-
efforts continus d'amli
No opinion
Dans le cadre de la ralisation des tudes d'impact, Nous il serait
pensons opportun
que leque No
registre opinion
celles-ci
est plutt
soientutile
publies
pour en
atteindre
amont l'objectif
de la publication
politique
Les institutions devraientSomewhatgalementuseful
tre plus transparentes
Toutefois, lelors registre
de leurs
contient
ngociations
No opinion
trop de dispositions
trilatrales. administratives et/ou des ex
They may be transparentSomewhat useful The present
Das register is v Partially
Transparenzregister ist schlechtagree durchdacht. Es enthlt Ausnahmen fr g
In groen Teilen arbeit Not useful at all von Lobbybudgets scheint Disagree
- wenn man Berichten einschlgiger Transparenz-
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Fully agree
ghly transparent Somewhat useful Beaucoup d'informationsFully s agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
There is always place fo Somewhat useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Die EU-Institutionen be Somewhat useful Das TransparenzregisterPartially agree
Das Transparenzregister ist ein ntzliches Instrument zur Regulierung der Int
latively transparent Very useful Zunchst pldieren wir fr Fully agree
klarere Leitlinien. Anforderungen, wie beispielswei
ot transparentDaimler
at all begrt die Transparenz Somewhat useful Most citizens
mit der die EU-Institutionen
Auch die Berechnung have neithe
vorangehen. No opinion
der Besonders
Mitgliedsbeitrge
die ffentliche
sollte imBereitstellung
Sinne der Vergleichbark
von Arbeits
ot transparentZur
at all
Strkung der Transparenz Very useful
und der Verlsslichkeit
Auerdemder Daten sollteimvermehrt Fully agree
Transparenzregister
sicher gestellt sollten
werden,
die dass
EU-Institutionen
die Qualitt ein
derintegri
Regis
Somewhat useful Fully agree
Der Abstand von BrsselNot useful at all Sofern Details aus Verh Fully agree
A balance is important b Very useful Fully agree
Secondo la mia percezione Somewhat useful Dipende da come viene u Partially agree
latively transparent Very useful Partially agree
ghly transparent Very useful the register has become Fully agree
It is difficult to know Somewhat useful Fully agree
Sono relativamente traspSomewhat useful Purch il regolamento chDisagree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Council Working Parties Very useful The Register should be m Fully agree
The discussion on transpSomewhat useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
latively transparent Very useful Fully agree
Parliament in general lead to far greater transparency.
- The We
register
also should
see thatbecome
severalthe
member
centralstates
hub ofare
lobby transparency. This mea
For purposes
Trilogues: of this
These consultation,
informal Access Info
inter-institutional Europe
meetings
In theismeantime,
only focusing
between on transparency
the European
before Parliament,ofthe
a legally-bindingEU institutions
lobby
Council
register regarding
of the
is Europeanlobbying
introduced,
Union ac
it willan
b
BUT I will talk on behalf of the people who are showing BUT I will theirtalk
outrage
on behalf
due of to the
this people
decision.whoThearefact
showing
is that their
throughout
outragethisdueLEGA
to th
Good and most importanChanged to include certaAll institutions and mem No opinion
And that is the very thingChanged
is in question NOWcerta
to include andAnd I think
Every that you
is the
entity should
veryto
triyng take
thing
in under
is in question
Good great consideration
NOW and Ithe thinkfollowing:
you should take und
WHY did they (JNE) act the way they
Changed did, I am
to include sure
certa WHY
Thethe did
actions
registertheyhave
(JNE)
thattoputactTODOS
incl the wayPOR
Average they ELdid,PERU
I am sureout the
of campaign
actions that were
putlong
TOD b
WHY did it happen
The register at that
is difficult Nospecific
opinionmoment, please WHY
The take did
lacka look
it happen
of at thefor
means at
polls
that historical
specific moment,
anAverage data for the
please
last take
90 days
a lookandatyoull
the polls
see th
hi
No opinion No opinion
Please also focus on the WHO, who actually shared Please lightalso
on thefocuserror
onmadethe WHO, by thewhopolitical
actually
party
shared
whichlight
greatly
on the
benefit
errorthe
made
otheb
Changed to include certaThe religious communities Average
But most Importantly please Preserved thethe
question same
WHY asthis
currently
ButJNE most official
Importantly
did not please Good
show more
question
leniency
the WHY
towards
this the
JNEdemocratic
official didprocess
not show by
And that for some reasonPreserved the same as
the JNE judgments is currently
more
And that forgiven
for some
and Ireason
am sureGood
theshe
JNEwilljudgments
be allow toiscontinue.
more forgiven and I am sure
I pray you can read this message
Changed andto exclude
can notice
certaIKommunale
how
prayforyou mecan and read
thosethiswhomessage
Good
Gebietskrperschaften,I shareandthe can
same
ihre notice
concern
how there
Zusammenschlsse for meis and
clearly
undthose a Verb
ihre case
who f
Churches and religious communities should definitely be included.
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Institutionen stellen auchAverage die kommunalen Verwaltungen Ebenen der ffentlic
A too broad definition is meaningless. By the above Firstdefinition
of all, different
any citizencountries
that writes
have an very
email
different
to hisstandards
representative
on whatin parliamen
constitute
quel que
Crucial soit le lieu o Changed to exclude certa
are: lBut
e lobbying
even if we desareEtats meAverage
talking about actual churches and religious groups. A lot o
Conflicts
1) aim (asofalready
interestincan
the Preserved the same as currently
definition above) There really is no reasonGood to exclude them. They are not above the law.
2) quantity (e.g. how often) Changed to exclude certa Local and municipal autho Good
3) professionality (are theChanged
people doing
to include
it paidcerta
forAlso,
doingone it? Orshould
are they
only at exclude
least
Goodpart political
of anparties
organization
if this isthat
notsatisfies
too easily 1) abusable
?)
Wie sieht das dann im Changed to include certaKirchen- und Religionsg Good
Changed to include certaIk vind eigenlijk dat ied Average
Die Frage, die sich hier Changed to include certaInternationale zwischensGood
The scope of the register should be very clear. Public administrations on all le
Changed to include certaA maximum of transparenc Good
Changed to include certaTransparantie krijg
On the other hand, all other je pas Average
organisations should be included. Noting that the
Changed to include certamona zamieszcza inform Good
The definition is too na Changed to include certaFurthermore, the Register Average
should be mandatory for membership of all bodies
Alle Bereiche Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certaBy nature, the above exaPoor
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaIn addition to those mentGood
Changed to include certaRegierung
The currentvon Drittstaa
definition Poor
does not make clear if the EU does not want to have th
Changed to include certaThere is no reason to exclude Average religious groups if the EU wants to take measu
Changed to include certaAnyone Es sollteutilising
keine Ausnah
the RegisterGoodthat could in any way be considered to be repre
Changed to include certa Good
Changed to include certaIt should include all ent Good
viene, di fatto, escluso il Changed to include certaincludere gli enti pubbliciGood
Changed to include certaPartis politiques (possib Good
Changed to exclude certa churches and religious cGood
Changed to include certaNo group should be exclGood
Sounds good per se, butChangedn to include certaThe Register will need toGood
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to exclude certa Member states should f Poor
Changed to include certaChurches and religious cNo opinion
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certapolitical parties No opinion
Must include all payement Changed to include certaShould apply to all entiti Poor
Changed to include certaMust include churches an Good
Changed to exclude certa overheidsdiensten kunnen No opinion
Changed to include certaAll organisations shoul Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl No opinion
Changed to include certaChiese, partiti politici, g Poor
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certaall entities mentioned a Good
Changed to include certaI believe that if any kin No opinion
I could wish to have inc Changed to include certain types of entities (pl No opinion
Changed to include certaReligious institutions ha Average
There are no activities coChanged to include certaJust add all parties invo Poor
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Kommunale Gebietskrper Average
Changed to include certaIt should be expanded toGood
Activities covered by th Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to exclude certa Everyone who can influeAverage
Changed to include certathe excluded entities ref Good
Changed to include certacatholic church in italy Average
Changed to include certaEvery special interest gr Average
Changed to include certachurches
Kommunale andGebietskrperschaften,
religious co Good ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Institutionen stellen auchAverage
die kommunalen Verwaltungen Ebenen der ffentlic
Changed to include certaChurches and religious co Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
So SOLLTE es zumindest Changed to include certaJEDE Organisation, Inte Average
Changed to include certaMember states governmen No opinion
Changed to include certaAll public parties should Average
Changed to include certaOrganizzazioni religiose Good
No opinion keine Ausnahmen, das ist Average
klar, auch Regierungsstellen knnen einseitig sein
Changed to include certa Good
Changed to include certaChurches and religious co Good
Changed to include certaAll entities, engaged in Good
Die Vertretung der im V Changed to exclude certa Den Kommunen
Kommunale und ihrePoor
k
Gebietskrperschaften, ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
Changed to include certaIn general, EU institutio Good
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen haben sich Average
in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Preserved the same as currently Poor
Disband politic as it is, No opinion http://www.coindesk.co Poor
No opinion No opinion
Changed to include certaMglichst alle Akteure Good
Changed to exclude certa Transparentcy is transparPoor
No opinion Good
What is indirect influenceChanged to include certaThe scope of Register s Poor
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaAs written in comment abPoor
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Nofields
Define lobbying for certain opinion Broaden the Transparency Average
Register to include journalists
Preserved the same as
You will need to clarify some definitions of who is Ascurrently
a lobbyist.
the journalism
We saw Average
profession
that in thecontinues
first roundtowhen
sufferthink
under tanks
the evolution
and law firms
in thedid
nen
No opinion
Other academics are clearly lobbying but think they Forare
example,
protectedin 2013,
by their Average
Corporate
university Europe
titles. For
Observatory
example,(CEO)
the IUCN
offered
Taskforce
to pay fo
fr
Action point: Define clearly
Changed
what types
to include
of activities
certaKommunale
Action
are considered
point Gebietskrperschaften,
create
as required
a section
Goodtoinopen
the ihre
transparency
a dossier in the
registry
Transparency
Zusammenschlsse for und
journalists
Register,
ihre whe
Verb
No opinion Average
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen haben sich Average
in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certa"certain entities, for ex Average
Pourquoi mettre "notam Changed to include certaLes partis politiques, l Good
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaMember States' governmen Average
Changed to exclude certa Local, municipal authoritAverage
No opinion Average
Provide the public with f Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
This statement misses equ Preserved the same as currently No opinion
Changed to exclude certa Kommunen und ihren komm No opinion
Changed to include certaEvery entity that wants t Good
Der Geltungsbereich we Changed to exclude certa Die kommunalen Gebietsk Average
As is typical of the EU, Changed to include certaYouKommunen, kommunalePoor
epitomise verbiage anZusammenschlsse und ihre Verbnde sowie deren
Der Umfang des Geltungsb Changed to exclude certa Den Kommunen und ihren Average
kommunalen Spitzenverbnden kommt neben Bu
No opinion
Toutes ces activits doivent faire l'objet d'une publicit
inclureprenne
les entits
intgre Goodla
religieuses
dans ; dcision.
Changed to include certainclure les organisations Good intergouvernementales internationales et leurs miss
Changed to include certaNo one should be exempAverage
Changed to include certaThe register should incluNo opinion
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to exclude certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certapolitical parties, labours, Average
It is necessary that all Changed to include certaAt least churches and reAverage
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaall entities need to be i Average
Changed to include certaChiese e comunit religioAverage
Changed to include certaAll entities Average
Changed to include certaChiese e comunit religi No opinion
Changed to include certachurches and religious cGood
No opinion Poor
Changed to include certaIt should basicly contain No opinion
Changed to include certatoutes
Kommunaleles parties prena No opinion ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
Gebietskrperschaften,
Preserved the same as currently Average
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen haben sich Average
in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Changed to include certaNegar la historia de la Average
No opinion No opinion
No opinion Average
Changed to include certaAlle entiteiten (maar me No opinion
Preserved the same as currently No opinion
Changed to include certatous ceux qui sont l'o Average
Aitec considers that all churches and religious communities, political parties,
Changed to include certaKommunale
Im Sinne hchstmgliche Good
Gebietskrperschaften, ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
No opinion There should be no excep
Average
It is also essential that all third country (ie those outside of the EU) governme
Der Rhein-Kreis Neuss sChanged to exclude certa Die Institutionen haben sich Average
in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
The definition of lobbyin Changed to include certaWe consider that all churches andtoreligious communities, political parties,corr
thir
Furthermore, the register Average
applies law firms but many refuse to register
No opinion It is also essential that allGood
third country (ie those outside of the EU) governme
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to exclude certa Den Kommunen
Furthermore, the und ihren
register No opinion
applies to law firms but many refuse to register corr
Changed to include certa Poor
Changed to include certaThe reason for excludingGood
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaInclude everyone excep Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Unter Interessenvertret Changed to exclude certa Kommunalbehrden undAverage St
Unter Interessenvertret Changed to exclude certa Kommunalbehrden undAverage St
Preserved the same as currently Average
Provided the definition c Changed to include certaAll lobbying should be r No opinion
Let's see the actual detaChanged to include certaEverything need to be reAverage
Preserved the same as currently Good
The definition is reasonaChanged to include certaThere should be no exceGood
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently No opinion
Preserved the same as currently No opinion
No opinion Kommunale Gebietskrperschaften,Good ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen haben sich Average
in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Changed to include certaf.i. regional public aut Good
Changed to include certaEverybody must be appl Average
To ensure the intent of Changed to include certaIt should apply to all p Good
Preserved the
Die interinstitutionelle Vereinbarung same as
zwischen currently
dem Europischen Parlament Goodund der Europischen Kommission enthlt bereits
Blaming" derer, die sich Changed include certaKommunale
complianttoverhalten. It should holdGebietskrperschaften,
member s Good ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
sollten aus dem Anwendungsbereich des Registers ausgenommen werden. G
No opinion Het register moet van Poor
toepassing worden voor alle lobbyende entiteiten, zoal
Institutionen stellen auch die kommunalen Verwaltungen Ebenen der ffentlic
Changed to include certaIt should coverall. NO No opinion
prachtige bedoeling maarChanged to include certaDie Institutionen haben sich Average
in den europischen
Registration in the Transparency Register should Vertrgen
depend solelyselbst
onverpflichte
the nature
Die weite Definition hat inPreserved the same zu
der Vergangenheit as Missverstndnissen
currently Good
gefhrt. Eine Vielzahl von Fllen,
insbesondere solche im Zusammenhang
Changed to exclude mit Wahlkampfveranstaltungen
certa
It is also essential that all der
Average
Abgeordneten
third des Europischen
country (ie those outside of theParlaments
EU) governme und
Lobbying takes place alsChanged to include certaEveryone should be incluPoor
Demokratisch gewhlte uChanged to exclude certa JFinally,
ede Form der Ausdehnun
the register Noto
applies opinion
law firms but many refuse to register correctly,
We consider that the defiChanged to include certa Average
Changed to include certaMainitut poikkeukset tul Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Diese Definition Changed
ist ausseems
unserer to include certa
Sicht nichtAlthough If
in allenThe you decide
Teilen such
angemessen. a regiPoor
The existing definition appropriate. it exclusion
uses broad publicGroe
ofterms (e.g.
bodies europische
Interest
(at whatever Interessenvertreter
representation)
level) is broadly wrden
that arelegitimate
not definedgleichg
andprec
ca
Changed to includevor.
Daher schlagen wir ein Drei-Stufen-Modell certa The register should
Organisationen, apply
die ein Good vor Ort in Brssel unterhalten, sollten sich v
Vertretung
So wrerefinements
Further sichergestellt, dass
Nodefinition
of the opinion
im Transparenzregister
are unlikely toDie
Primaausschlielich
gewhlten
produce dieentities
faciesignificant
all other Organisationen
Average
Volksvertreter
additionalin benefitsaufgefhrt
den kommunalen
undertaking and risk sind,
activities that die fr denthe
europisch
Gebietskrperschaften
simply fall
generating
under neh
uncertain
definition
Das Kapitel Muss ich mChanged to exclude certa Mit Blick u. a. auf kommunale Good Resolutionen, Konsultationsbeitrge, Brssel-D
We note that the current Changed
definition to include the
excludes certa an
Council
As intermediate
and Member,
step Average
States
any and
entity
other
of aEUtype
entities,
that issuch
currently
as theexcluded
European from
Supth
Changed to include certa Good
Changed to include certalaw firms Average
Preserved the same as currently No opinion
Changed to include certaInclure le plus grand no No opinion
No opinion Good
A spotkanie posa z min Changed to include certaNo dokadnie to pytanie Average
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaDifferent communities cou Good
Changed to include certaAll lobbying should be p Average
Changed to include certaAny organisation seekingNo opinion
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaLe registre ne doit fair Average
Changed to include certaKirchen und ReligionsgeAverage
Siehe 1.1. c bezgl. lang Changed to include certaJede Stelle muss klar in Poor
il registro deve essere c Changed to include certaTutte le organizzazioni, No opinion
Changed to include certaAlle Einrichtungen soll Good
Changed to include certaKommunale
Tutte le associazioni comNo opinion ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
Gebietskrperschaften,
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Institutionen stellen auchAverage
die kommunalen Verwaltungen Ebenen der ffentlic
Trustee Third Parties an No opinion Average
Changed to include certaI see no reason to excludGood
Leider zu wenig transpa Changed to include certaauf alle Personen und OrAverage
Changed to include certaAuch fr Kommunalbehrd Average
The definition is appropr Changed to include certaI see no reason to exclu Average
No opinion Average
Changed to include certaUK local authorities. At Good
Changed to include certaChurches, religious comm Good
Changed to include certacan't see why there's a No opinion
I would say yes, but as sChanged to include certaIt should include any entNo opinion
The register should also Changed to include certaI see of no reason why aAverage
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaIl semble impratif, puis
Kommunale Gebietskrperschaften, Average ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
Every meeting or appointm Changed to include certaEqual treatment for all Poor
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen
Kommunale haben sich Average
in den europischen
Gebietskrperschaften, Vertrgen selbst
ihre Zusammenschlsse verpflichte
und ihre Verb
Changed to include certaInstitutionen
Certain typesstellenof entities
auchGooddie kommunalen Verwaltungen Ebenen der ffentlic
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Average
Die Begriffe der "Lobby Changed to exclude certa Kommunen, kommunaleGood Zu
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certaSe debe incluir a las igl Good
Changed to include certaAll entities No opinion
The existing lobby registChanged to include certaIt should cover any orga Good
Changed to include certanatrlich um Religionsg No opinion
Changed to exclude certaThere are far too many wPoor
Only those with a hidde Changed to include certaOur politicians are publ Average
prepte, dvate tu ot Changed to include certakad, ktor chce Poor
Changed to include certachurches and religious cNo opinion
Changed to include certaAll entities should appl Average
Does this include freebi Changed to include certaAny organisation seekingNo opinion
Changed to include certain
All types
actorsofthatentities (pl Good
undertake lobbying or that are representing their own interests
Changed to include certa Average
Changed to include certaEs gibt keinen Grund, beGood
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaThe register should cont Good
No opinion No opinion
Changed to include certaAnyone who uses lobbyin Average
Voting is lobbying. Ever Changed to include certaIt should include everyo No opinion
Changed to include certaInclude churches and reliPoor
Changed to include certain types
1. All of entities
lobbyists (pl Average
and those are representing their own interests must register. C
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certa2. Law firms, PR firms and Goodthink tanks must be included in the mandatory lob
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaAll entities should be re Average
No opinion Average
Changed to include certaDepuis quand les groupes No opinion
Changed to include certaAll
tous services
actors that de l'Etat, Good
undertake lobbying or that are representing their own interests
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAlso law firms, PR firms and Average
think tanks should be included in the mandatory
It is surely axiomatic that all churches and religious communities, political par
Changed to include certain All
types of entities (pl No opinion
actors that undertake lobbying or that are representing their own interes
Changed to include certaOf course
It isAlso
alsolaw itfirms,
should
essential PRincl
that allGood
firms andcountry
third think tanks should
(ie those be included
outside of the in
EU)thegovernme
mandato
Changed to include certaAll lobbyists, without exception, Good should be required to register, whether actors
The definition of lobbyin Changed to include certaFurthermore,
Also law firms,the register
PR firms Good
applies to law
and think firms
tanks but many
should refuse to
be included register
in the corr
mandato
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certa Poor
Changed to include certaAll state and non state aAverage
Changed to include certajede Gruppierung, die verGood
Needs to be as strong asChanged to include certaANY lobbyist organisati Good
Changed to include certaEs sollte erweitert werd Poor
Changed to include certaMandatstrger mit einer Average
This definition is strong Changed to include certaAll actors actorsthat that
undertakeGood
undertake lobbying or that are representing theirow
Changed to include certaregister in order for citizens Poorto know the kind of activities and lobbying u
Changed to include certaJeder sollte sich eintra Average
Preserved the same as currently No opinion
Changed to include certaDas Register sollte fr Good
Changed to include certaJede(r) die (der) Einflu Good
Changed to include certaKirchen und ReligionsgeGood
Limit meetings with big bChanged to include certaAny Alland all entities
actors tha Good
that undertake lobbying or that are representing their own interes
Again. The solution is
Very strong definition. t Changed to include certano exceptions, no leak-hAverage
Changed to include certachurchesAlso law and religious
firms, cGood
PR firms and think tanks should be included in the mandato
All efforts should be made Changed
to resisttoany
include
demands
certato All
weaken
actorsit.that undertake Average
lobbying or that are representing their own interes
Changed to include certaGrundstzlich
Also law firms, sollte
PRJE Average
firms and think tanks should be included in the mandato
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certa Average
it covers SOME of the acPreserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaSoveltamisalaan pitisi l Good
Changed to include certaAll Kirchen,
actorsReligionsgemein
that undertake Nlobbying
o opinion or that are representing their own interests
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAlso law firms, PR firms and Average
think tanks should be included in the mandatory
A register does not stop Changed to include certaAt the very least, anyon No opinion
Definition should explici Changed to include certaIt should at least apply No opinion
Preserved the same as currently Good
It has to be clear who t Changed to include certaNo entities should be ex Average
This is a good definition Changed to include certaAll it should include ALL
who undertake en Poor
lobbying or that are representing their own interests should
Changed to include certa Average
Changed to include certaThere should be no exc Good
Changed to include certaAlle Akteure, die auf as Average
No opinion Good
Meetings with big busineChanged to include certaTougher rules should notNo opinion
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaAll Gerade
actorsauf
thatdieundertake
Politik Average
lobbying or that are representing their own interests
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAlso law firms, PR firms and No opinion
think tanks should be included in the mandatory
Changed to include certaEs sollten keinerlei G Average
Changed to include certaAll actors that undertakeAverage
Wieder eine schwammige Changed to include
Formulierung. certaIn
I. sieheAuf alle Einrichtungen
oben.
jedem Good Gruppen und Instititutionen erweitert werden,
Fall um all diejenigen
Changed to include certaVollumfnglich und ohneAverage jegliche Ausnahmen. Dies soll auch fr Entscheidu
Changed to include certaauf alle Average
Es sollte dahinter auch Changed to include certaEs sollten alle beinhalt Average
lobbyists have superior Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certaEZB Average
All actors that undertake lobbying or that are representing their own interes
Changed to include certaAll There should
actors that be no
Also law firms, PR firmsexclu
undertake Average
lobbying
and thinkor that
tanksare representing
should theirinown
be included the interests
mandato
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAlso law firms, PR firms and Average
think tanks should be included in the mandatory
No opinion Good
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certa All actors that undertake Average
lobbying or that are representing their own interes
Changed to include certaKirchen und Religionsg
Also law firms, PR firms Noandopinion
think tanks should be included in the mandato
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certa Average
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaLaw firms, PR firms, thinGood
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaRegister
Also law sind
firms,nicht
PR firms Poor wenn hierzu kein Anlass gegeben wird.
zu fhren,
Entweder unabhngige EU- No opinion Politik funktioniert auch ohne No opinion
Lobbyismus !!!
Changed to include certaAny person or organisatiGood
Any person or organisation that undertakes lobbying or that are representing
Changed to include certa Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAll actors that undertakeAverage
Changed to include certaEvery entity should be inPoor
This is a very good definChanged to include certaAny body regardless of Good
Changed to include certaKirchen und Religionsgem Average
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAll actors that undertakeGood
Changed to exclude certa Gerade die Einflunahme Good
Changed to include certaIntegrar TODO tipo de reGood
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaGltigkeit fr alle, um Average
Changed to include certaKirchen und ReligionsgeNo opinion
Die gewhlten Volksvertreter
Preserved the same as currently Goodin den kommunalen Gebietskrperschaften neh
No opinion Gemeinwohlinteresse entweder direkt oder ber ihre Verbnde Einfluss auf d
No lobbying
opinion
All actors that undertake
Rechtsetzungsprozess auf EU-Ebene. or Den
that are representing their own
Kommunalverbnden kommt interes
hier
Preserved the same as currently Alsoeine
law wichtige Good
firms, PRBndelungsfunktion
firms and think tanks
einen zu.should be included in
Die gemeinsamen the mandato
Positionen un
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaStellungnahmen werden Average in demokratischen Strukturen erarbeitet und einem
Changed to include certaalle, - sonst
internen machts ja Average
Beschlussfassungsprozess unterworfen. Zum anderen tragen sie da
Changed to exclude certain types
Sorge, of entities
dass auch die (plBelange
Average und Interessen finanzschwcherer Kommunen
No opinion eigene Europakoordinatoren bzw. -abteilungen gleichberechtigt Bercksichtig
No opinion
Changed to include certaDie Um gewhlten
findenalleknnen. Volksvertreter
Dies ist zu
die Einrichtungen in den kommunalen
unterscheiden
Good Gebietskrperschaften
von der Einflussnahme neh
durch privat
Gemeinwohlinteresse
Lobbyisten, die lediglich
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good entweder direkt oder
Partikularinteressen ber ihre
vertreten. Verbnde
Dass eineEinfluss
der auf
Ebene d
Rechtsetzungsprozess
im Multi-Level-Governance-System auf EU-Ebene. mit Den Kommunalverbnden
Lobbyisten gleichgestellt wird,kommtist hier
Changed to include certaEnsure
All actorsthat all who do loGood
einen eine that
insbesondere undertake
wichtige
vor dem lobbying or
Bndelungsfunktion
Hintergrund that
von are
zu.
Art. representing
4Die
Abs. gemeinsamen theirPositionen
own interests
2 EUV (Anerkennung un
der
Preserved the same as currently
Also law
Stellungnahmenfirms, PR firms
werden Good
and
in think tanks
demokratischen should be
Strukturen included
lokalen Selbstverwaltung) sowie von Art. 5 Abs. 3 EUV (Subsidiarittsprinzip) in
erarbeitetthe mandatory
und einem
Very strong definition. Changed to include certainternen All actors
nicht that undertake Good lobbying or unterworfen.
Beschlussfassungsprozess
nachvollziehbar. that are representing their own
Zum anderen interests
tragen sie da
A very good definition t Changed to include certaSorge, Mit Blickdassu. a.auch
auf kommunale Average
die Belange und Interessen
Resolutionen, finanzschwcherer Kommunen
Konsultationsbeitrge,
Changed to include certain eigene
typesEuropakoordinatoren
Brssel-Delegationen, bzw. -abteilungen
of entities (pl EU-Veranstaltungen
No opinion undgleichberechtigt
-Projekte wird zudem Bercksichtig
nach d
Changed to include certafinden
Wortlaut
wenn eine knnen.
der Dies istvzu Nounterscheiden
Umsetzungsleitlinien
Einrichtung opinion(S. 6 f.)von
vonderfastEinflussnahme
allen Kommunen durch
einprivat
Das Kapitel Muss ich mich registrieren?
Changed in den
to include Lobbyisten,
certaLeitlinien
Eintrag erwartet,
Smtliche zur die lediglich Partikularinteressen
einer enormen, nichtvertreten.
was zu Average
Entscheidungs Dass eine
gerechtfertigten der Ebene
Aufblhung de
im Multi-Level-Governance-System
interinstitutionellen Vereinbarung ber das Transparenzregister
Registers fhrenknnte mit Lobbyisten gleichgestellt
wrde. Aus verfassungspolitischen wird,
(siehe u. a. Art. 4 ist
und 5
Changed to include certaRegister bi se moral uporAverage
optimiert werden. Wenn Veranstaltungen in Bezug insbesondere
EUV,
auf Art.
Manahmen
28 GG, vor Art.
dem
oder71 Hintergrund
Verfahren von Art. 4Baden-Wrttemberg,
Landesverfassung Abs. 2 EUV (Anerkennung Art. 83 der
+
der EU organisiert werden, Changed
zu denento include certa
lokalen
Kommissionsmitglieder,
Verfassung ,
des
MdEP Good
Selbstverwaltung)
Freistaates
und deren sowie
Bayern,vonArt.
Art.845 Abs. 3 EUV (Subsidiarittsprinzip)
Verfassung des Freistaates Sach
Zwingend
Assistenten muss
oderauch VOR
Changed
EU-Beamte to include
eingeladen certaEs
wurden, und drfen
nicht
kann keinerlei
nachvollziehbar.
pragmatischen
es sich Ein
schlielich
GrndenAverage
auchistumeine Ausnahme der Kommunen (local author
Must not be weakened. Changed to include certa
reine Fachvortrge seitens der EU-Institutionen handeln, All
Mit lobbyists
Blick
sowie der u. a.should
auf be c
kommunale
dieVereinigungen
mit der No
undopinion
Resolutionen,
Netze, Konsultationsbeitrge,
die zu ihrer Vertretung gegrndet werde
Einflussnahme auf die Politikgestaltung
Changed to exclude Brssel-Delegationen,
auf EU-Ebene
certa
aus dem nichts
Anwendungsbereich
zu tun haben. EU-Veranstaltungen und -Projekte wird
Good des Transparenz-Registers zudem nach d
zwingend.
Changed to include certaWortlaut
das Register der Umsetzungsleitlinien
soll fr al No opinion(S. 6 f.) von fast allen Kommunen ein
Das Kapitel Muss ich mich No registrieren?
opinion in den Leitlinien
Eintrag erwartet,
zur was zu Average
einer enormen, nicht gerechtfertigten Aufblhung de
interinstitutionellen Vereinbarung ber das Transparenzregister
Registers fhren knnte
wrde. Aus verfassungspolitischen (siehe u. a. Art. 4 und 5
Preserved the same as currently Good
optimiert werden. Wenn Veranstaltungen in Bezug EUV,
auf Art.
Manahmen
28 GG, Art. oder71Verfahren
Landesverfassung Baden-Wrttemberg, Art. 83
Just having a list is ins Changed to include certa
der EU organisiert werden, zu denen Kommissionsmitglieder,Public Information
Verfassung des MdEP Act: aAverage
Freistaates
und deren Bayern, Art. 84 Verfassung des Freistaates Sach
Assistenten oder EU-Beamte Changed to include
eingeladen certaAlle
wurden, Auch
und
kannsollten aufgenommen
Anwaltskanzleien,
pragmatischen
es sich schlielich
GrndenGood
Firmen
auchistumzur
eineffentlichkeitsarbeit
Ausnahme der Kommunen und Denkfabriken
(local authorm
Nur,
reinewenn diese Bedinigu
Fachvortrge Changed
seitens to include certa
der EU-Institutionen handeln,
sowie der dieVereinigungen
mit der Good
und Netze, die zu ihrer Vertretung gegrndet werde
Einflussnahme auf die Politikgestaltung
Changed to excludeauf EU-Ebene
certa
aus dem nichts
Anwendungsbereich
zu tun haben. Good des Transparenz-Registers zwingend.
Changed to include certaAll every entities
actors that undertake Averagelobbying or that are representing their own interests
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAlso law firms, PR firms and Average
think tanks should be included in the mandatory
" Influer le processus d Preserved the same as currently Average
Er zou ook gekeken moeten worden en rekening gehouden moeten worden m
De omschrijving 'tot doelChanged
hebben' istoniet
include
goedcertain
De types
genoeg, pers
want of het
heeftentities
op
biedt (pl
deze ruimteAverage
manier aaneenontwijken
onevenredig
op grond grotevaninvloed
definitie.
op de
Hetpolitieke
bedrijfsl
Changed
Ondertussen oefenen ze invloed uit! to include certaKirchen und ReligionsgeGood
Dat zou bijvoorbeeld kunnen gebeuren door de media op te nemen in het reg
Het 'tot doel hebben' moet Changed
dus wegtoininclude
de omschrijving
certa voor wie het register Average
bedoeld is.
No opinion No opinion
Changed to include certain All types
actorsofthat entities (pl Poor
undertake lobbying or that are representing their own interests
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAlso law firms, PR firms
All actors that undertake lobbying and
Good think or
tanks
thatshould be includedtheir
are representing in the
own mandatory
interests
Changed to include certaAnwalts-Kanzleien; PR-Fi Good
Also law firms, PR firms and think tanks should be included in the mandatory
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certa Average
nicht nachvollziehbar.
Mit Blick u. a. auf kommunale Resolutionen, Konsultationsbeitrge,
Brssel-Delegationen, EU-Veranstaltungen und -Projekte wird zudem nach d
Wortlaut der Umsetzungsleitlinien (S. 6 f.) von fast allen Kommunen ein
Das Kapitel Muss ich mich registrieren? in den Leitlinien
Eintrag erwartet,
zur was zu einer enormen, nicht gerechtfertigten Aufblhung de
interinstitutionellen Vereinbarung ber das Transparenzregister
Registers fhren knnte
wrde. Aus verfassungspolitischen (siehe u. a. Art. 4 und 5
optimiert werden. Wenn Veranstaltungen in Bezug EUV, auf Art.
Manahmen
28 GG, Art. oder
71Verfahren
Landesverfassung Baden-Wrttemberg, Art. 83
der EU organisiert werden, Changed to include
zu denen certaTous
Kommissionsmitglieder,
Verfassungles acteurs
des
MdEP quiund
reprAverage
Freistaates
derenBayern, Art. 84 Verfassung des Freistaates Sach
Stop the questions
Assistenten aboutNo opinion
oder EU-Beamte Stop
eingeladen wurden,Registration
und kann alleslobbying.....it's
sichshould
pragmatischen schlielich Poor
be mandatory
Grndenauchistum forAusnahme
eine all that undertake lobbying (local
der Kommunen or thatauthor
are r
Must
reine be implemented
Fachvortrge asChanged
seitens der to include certa
EU-Institutionen Citizens
handeln,
sowie der should
die know
Vereinigungen
mit der what
Good
lobbying
und Netze, is being
die zu carried
ihrer
Diese Definition ist aus unserer Sicht nicht angemessen. Denn danach msste sich jede noch so kleine Organisation registrier out without
Vertretung exception
gegrndet inc
werde
Einflussnahme auf die Politikgestaltung
Changed to exclude
auf Under
EU-Ebene
certa
aus
Wir schlagen daher ein dreistufiges Modell vor. Organisationen dem the
nichts Irish Lobbying
Anwendungsbereich
zu tun haben. Act
Good you
des must register if
Transparenz-Registers
mit Bro in Brssel sollten you are carrying
zwingend.on
sich in jedem Fall registrieren. lobbying
Regi
Kommunale Gebietskrperschaften, ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
No opinion 1. You are communicating either directly or indirectly with a Designated Pu
Average
7
2. That communication is about a relevant matter and
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa Institutionen stellen auchAverage die kommunalen Verwaltungen Ebenen der ffentlic
3. That communication is not specifically exempted and;
Le registre doit concerneChanged to include certaLe registre doit s'appliquGood
4. You are one of the following:
Changed to include certaAll entities should be
A professional in Good
lobbyist being paid to communicate on behalf of a client (w
Changed to include certaKommunalbehrden
application withund
du registre
An employer Kommunalverbnde
p Average
more than 10 employees where sind Regionalbehrden
the communications unda
Changed to exclude certa I dontA representative
see any interest body with at least one employee communicating on beh
Good
Das
Den AnRegister
advocacysolltebody
in sich kohrent
with at least sein. Es kann nicht
one employee willkrlich
that exists eine staatli
primarily to tak
Changed to exclude certa Ebene Kommunen
vom und ihren Good
Anwendungsbereich ausnehmen, eine andere aber davon erfass
Any
Changed to include certaalle Einrichtungen person communicating
Good about the development or zoning of land.
No opinion Wenn Goodund Verbnde sowie diplomatische Vertretunge
So for regionale Vertretungen
example churches may be required to register.
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certaDieThe Institutionen
The Register arehaben
following should sich
appl
Excepted in
or den
Average europischen
Exempted Vertrgen selbst
Communications and areverpflichte
not rega
Changed to include certaThere
should be
Private affairs no excluNo opinion
Gebietskrperschaften, ihrerZusammenschlsse und Verbnde vom
Changed to include certachurches Diplomatic relationscGood
and religious
Anwendungsbereich
types Factual information des Registers.
I would provide clear ex Changed to include certain of entities (pl No opinion
Changed to include certa
Alle Published
Akteure, diesubmissions
Wre jegliche unmittelbare und mittelbare Einflussnahme
Safetyerfasst, gbe esPoor
eigene
and security keine
Es sollte JEGLICHE
Ausnahmen (s.u.). FORMChanged to include certaEs gibt keinen Grund, waAverage
Parliamentary committees
Changed to exclude certa Communications byGood Designated Public Officials or public servants
Changed to include certaincludere
Kommunale anche
Governance organizz AverageState
Gebietskrperschaften,
of Commercial ihre Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verb
bodies
Die weite Definition ha Changed to exclude certa .Die Institutionen
Policyhaben
Working sich
Average
in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Groups
Section 5 of the Irish Re Changed to include certaFurther information on these Average
exemptions is at page 7 of https://www.lobbying
No opinion No opinion
Kommunalbehrden und Kommunalverbnde sind Regionalbehrden und de
Preserved the same as currently
Das Register sollte in sich Good
kohrent sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich eine staatli
Changed to include certain Wenntypes
Alle Akteure,of entities
regionale (pl Average
die Vertretungen
im Eigeninteresse Lobbyarbeit
und Verbnde betreiben
sowie sollen eingeschlos
diplomatische Vertretunge
Sehr gute Defnition! DIe Changed to include certaDie Anwaltskanzleien,
Institutionen haben PR-Agenturen
Good
sich in denund Think-TanksVertrgen
europischen sollen eingeschlossen we
selbst verpflichte
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Gebietskrperschaften, ihrer GoodZusammenschlsse und Verbnde vom Anwend
Changed to exclude certa Si les autorits rgionaleGood
Diese Definition ist zie Changed to include certaALLE Akteure,
Alle Akteure, diedie
alsLobbya Noauftreten
Lobby opinion oder ihre eigenen Interessen vertreten,
Dies ist eine sehr gute Changed to include certaAuerdem sollten Anwaltskanzleien, Good PR-Agenturen und Think Tanks in ein ve
Lobbyvirksomhed og inter No opinion Average
vgl. Anmerkungen zu Pun Changed to include certaSoweit rechtlich mglich Average
Kommunalbehrden und Kommunalverbnde sind Regionalbehrden und de
Changed to include certaIt would
Das be useful
Register solltetoininsich
Average
kohrent sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich eine staatli
No opinion Die
All Bayerische
actors that undertake
Wenn regionale Vertretungen
Kommunalbehrden undGood
Staatsregierung
lobbying
undnimmt
or zur
that
Verbnde
Kommunalverbnde Kenntnis,
are dass their
representing
sowie aktuell
diplomatische own
sind Regionalbehrden von regiona
interests
Vertretunge
und de
All efforts should be ma Changed to include certaAlso law firms,
Die Institutionen
Das Register solltePR firms
haben and
Average
sich
in sich think tanks should
in den europischen
kohrent be included
sein. Es kannVertrgen in the
nicht willkrlich mandatory
selbst eine
verpflichte
staatli
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Die deutschen Lnder
Gebietskrperschaften,
Wenn regionale bilden
ihrer
Good
Vertretungen den
und Bundesrat
Zusammenschlsse
Verbnde und sind
und damit
VerbndeMitglieder
vom eines
Anwend
All actors that undertake lobbying or that are sowie diplomatische
representing their ownVertretunge
interests
Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen haben sich Good in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Als Trger hoheitlicher Aufgaben verfgen sie ber eigene Gesetzgebungszu
Very strong definition. A Changed to include certaAlso law firms, PR firms and
Good think tanks should
Auch Kirchen und Religionsgemeinschaften,
Kommunalbehrden und Kommunalverbnde be included
politische
sind in theRegierungen
Parteien,
Regionalbehrden mandatory
und de
Changed to include certaChurches
Das Register
Schon and religious
die grundstzliche cAverage
sollte in sichRegistrierungsmglichkeit
kohrent sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich
stellt eine
die Lnder staatli
funktion
Der gegenwrtigen, weitrChanged to include certaAuch Wenndie bisherige
regionale Unterscheidung
Average
Vertretungen zwischensowie
und Verbnde regionalen BehrdenVertretunge
diplomatische einerseits
Wre jegliche
Eine breite unmittelb
Definition Changed
spiegelt to exclude
die Vielfalt certa Die Institutionen
von Lobbyttigkeit
Gleichzeitig auf
darf haben
europischer
eine sich
Good in den europischen
Nichtaufnahme
Ebene angemessen Vertrgen
in das Register
wieder.
nicht selbst verpflichte
Gleichzeitig
dazu fhren,
mussdass
da
Kommunalbehrden und Kommunalverbnde sind Regionalbehrden und de
Changed to exclude certa No opinion
Das Register sollte in sich kohrent sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich eine staatli
Das wre eine schne Fo Changed to include certaWenn ALLE Organisationen,
regionale VertretungendiAverageund Verbnde sowie diplomatische Vertretunge
Cette dfinition est part Changed to include certaDie Toutes les entitshaben
Institutionen non gsich
Good in den europischen Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Gebietskrperschaften, ihrer GoodZusammenschlsse und Verbnde vom Anwend
Changed to include certaWhere non-EU governments Poor
Changed to exclude certa In Deutschland kommt de Poor
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaA matter of equal treatm Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
No opinion Average
Changed to include certaThe scope of the RegisteAverage
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaQui dit largissement dit Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
There is however also a Preserved the same as currently
Den Lokalen Behrden und Good
den Kommunalverbnden kommt bei ihrer Einflu
Changed to include certainternen
all organisations must beAverage
Beschlussfassungsprozess unterworfen; sie bercksichtigen auch d
Changed to exclude certasowie deren Vereinigungen Good
und NetzeAnwendungsbereich aus dem Anwend
No opinion Average
Changed to include certapolitical parties, intern Average
Changed to include certaAll group of interest, wh Average
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
A definition is one thing Changed to include certaAny entity which seeks t Good
Preserved the same as cThere are very good rea Average
Changed to include certaServiciile guvernamentalAverage
Preserved the same as currently Good
No opinion Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certachurches and religious cGood
Changed to include certaThe Register should incl Good
Stimme der Definition zuChanged to include certaJede Vor-Ort Vertretung No opinion
Changed to include certaInclure glises, pays ti Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaAll entities should be c Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaEvery organization have Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
The EU officials should Changed to include certaEvery single entity shoulPoor
Changed to include certaShould include internati Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Poor
Preserved the same as currently Good be excluded. We have the right to know who i
I don't see why anyone should
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Poor
Please make sure that thChanged to include certa No opinion
Changed to exclude certaall representatives of in Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaECTAA believes that ethiAverage
Changed to include certaBecause of the instituti Good
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaAll relevant entities sh No opinion
No opinion Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certachiese comunit religiose, Average
Changed to include certaI think it should include Good
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaAll the above entities. Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
I mezzi di comunicazioniPreserved the same as cMantenuto a condizione Average ch
Changed to include certaLes glises et communau Good
Changed to include certaincludere le organizzazion Good
Preserved the same as currently
Israel er det eneste land Good
med en srlig aftale med EU - derfor er deres firma
Preserved the same as currently Good
Hvis Tyrliet fr lignende skal det ogs registreres. Ellers bliver der nemt flere
Hber man kan se om det Changed
e to include certaVil man have indflydelse,Good
m der glde samme normer for alle.
No opinion Average
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certaThe Regisiter should apply Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certaPolitical parties, nation Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certathird countries governmen Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Changed to include certaInternational Intergover Good
The register should also Changed to include certaIf transparency is the g Average
Changed to include certaTo include other entities Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Wie unter Nr. 2.1 vorgeschlagen, erstreckt sich der Geltungsbereich des Reg
This depends on whetherChanged to include certaChurches and religious cGood
No abarca todas las acti Changed to include certaDebe ampliarse progresiAverage
VORSCHLAG:
Changed to include certaKonstitutionelle Manahmen Goodentwickeln und beschlieen, welche absolut alle
Changed to include certaAll organisations with lo Good
No opinion It doesn't stop those wi Poor
Die Lobbyisten, AbgeordNo opinion Fuck die Politiker, Abg No opinion
Often it is unclear who f No opinion The politicians should b Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certaAll should be included e Poor
Changed to include certaThe Register should incl Good
Changed to exclude certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certashould include political Average
Changed to include certaall lobbying parteis shoulAverage
Preserved the same as currently Average
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaAll organisations that ar Good
Changed to include certaAll entities that attempt Average
Changed to include certaEveryone engaged in lobb Good
Changed to include certaShould include everyoneAverage
Preserved the same as currently Good
The European Commission and European Parliament will be aware that loca
that sense it is more than a lobby register and should cover all actors that ha
decision-making.
Kommunalbehrden In addition, since the definition
und Kommunalverbnde sindincludes both direct and
Regionalbehrden undindide
Das Register sollte in sich kohrent sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich eine staatli
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa also
Eine take into accountzwischen
Unterscheidung where certain actors advance the causebei of den
lobbyists w
Kommunalbehrden undGood Einzelkommune
Kommunalverbnde sindundRegionalbehrden
Verband Eintrag
und de
Preserved the same as currently Wir
Dassind der
Register Meinung,
sollte dassGood Kommunen, kommunale Zusammenschlsse und
Transparency International welcomes the broad definition transparent. of lobbying
This is in onsich
the case,
which kohrent
for EUsein.
theexample, Es
forkann
Transparency nicht
embassies willkrlich eine staatli
of third countries. T
Changed to exclude certa Die Kommunen
Wenn regionale sind direkt
Vertretungen Good vorund Ort Verbnde
erster Ansprechpartner
sowie diplomatische fr Brgerinnen
Vertretunge un
The
Wre register
jegliche does not distinguish
unmittelb Changed lobbying
to activits
exclude from intergovernmental
certa Die COSLA
Institutionen is more negotiations.
haben than happy
sich
Good in denthat our meetingsVertrgen
europischen with EU officials,selbst MEPs, et
Register
Le registre is built.
porte notamment sur les de interests
divers of their
groupes debusiness
pression*, community
representants or individual
d'intrt,companies
de plaidoyer Il verpflichte
(national
couvre cham
tou
*Politique Changed to include certa The same obligations shou Average
Section
The 2.2. incorrectly
Register should continuestates that
to Regional
include all public
external authorities
on Neither the and UK their
or Scottish
representative Parliament offices transparency
doshould
not havestandards
to register treat
but can
us ar
Groupe de pression, Preserved
organe de the same
dfense as currently
d'intrts ouinfluence.
EU dedecision
valeurs, As and
such,
qui law-making
essaiethird
Good country
par should
divers embassies
be made
moyens transparent
(campagnes, in thedirecte,
action same way
pr
Preserved the same as cS'il doit y avoir transpa Good
It
beshould
included exclude
on theALL list local,
of No regional authorities
organisations seeking to and NGOs, their
COSLA,
influence official
EUordecision-making
companies bodies
indeedor tradesuch
our sister
as COSLA.
unions. organisations
that should be in other Member States, does
opinion Good
This distinction plainly makesNo opinionno sense as a region Where isWe nonational
less
do not a democratically
have anyAverage
private elected
or voluntary
tier EUof government
body within as ourRegister
local
membership.
governmen
covered by the register. registers are missing, the Transparency should a
The register should incl Changed to include certaIt should include all poli Good
In
The Scotland
definition theofunitary
interestauthorities
No opinionhave an
representation average
should potential
sizeWe ofhave
167,000 ainfluence
publicpeople law with
statute
Good the and
smallestourMember
employees
about 4States times
are services
the
bound average
byatsame sizethe of
Transparency International welcomes the broadnot definition
The be made
EU lobby
any
Transparency
of lobbyingmore restrictive.
on coming
Register
which the Transparency
through
aimsEUto Transparency
make the influence Register ofisinterest
built. national
represe
The Register should Changed
continue to include
to elected
include certadovrebbe
all external Where influence. includere
national As registers
such, tuttithirdAverage
are country
missing,
We are
Registeret all public
International has
giver democratically
observed
ikke i how
Changed in the
to UK,institutions
include for example,
certa We
Det withOur
see
giveraan employees
them equal
definition
ingen obligation
taking
meningthat are
on is directly
to
positions
atoo
Average ofembassies
thataccountable
restrictive
of thetheEuropean
their has
EU to
national
led
Transparency
should
toanchampions be included
aParliament
elected Register
member on
ortoimportant
should
representthe list
assembly oua
ind
The scope
The definition of interest
of the activities representation should not
that lead to registration Allshould
beorganisations
made be anymore more
that
clearly restrictive.
currently
defined. fall
Transparency
under
That is the scopeInternational
of particular of relevance
the registerhas observed
for should
lawyers, rem
hoa
Aus
In
The Sicht
light
term desoriginal
of rules
the GDV and
advocacy istspirit
diChanged
of the
policy to include certa
Transparency
implementation are Erweiterung
Register,
Someambiguous auf
organisations,
Transparency allecontext
inaregister.
that Int
law Average
International
firms and consultancies,
reiterates that the
inCommittee
particular,
current register
still refuse
shouldto s
new
We strongly
situation where were
agree
lesswithoriginally
thanthe1% geared
broad
of the towards
definition
lobbyists andmaking
are scope covered
We
All COSLA
transparent
believe
of the
organisations
by the is
there
register nominating
any
areinundue
that clearly
that
currently itas theyof
influence
body
covers
somefall cover
the
common-sense
indirect
under such
theEuropean
big
the and
scope activities
corporate
direct
exemptions
of the as
lobbying well.
interests
register ofAlso
of
andmight
the the
Regions
officials
we
should wor
exert
largel
an
rem
We welcome the
Furthermore, paragraph No
broad definition opinion of lobbying as defined
7 of the Interinstitutional We support
Agreement by the a EUmandatory
considers Transparency
even Average
register Register
that applies
the preparation as ofit to
includes
all entities
letters, any seeking
information entity seeking to represe
material toorr
The
By CCBE
doing acknowledges Changed
that to include
theTransparency
Guidelines certa
have Oxfam attemptedmaintains toand thatformally
address all those
entities
Average undertaking
concerns, inbut lobbying/
in the form representing
ofpoliticians
ofan theirEU
administrative own did
The
In light of this
register the we
as it have
original been
currently
spirit ofunfairly
stands
the onlypenalised
requires here organisations
lobbyists
Register, The and We our
are
Register
to collective
already
disclose
Transparencydoes responsibility
their
however
entities meetingsregistered
need
International
from toreiterates
with
within bring
clearly
MEPs,
the the
togetherCommittee
define
European local
Commissioners,
that common-sense
Union the
that Regions
cabinets
do and as
exemption
not and
have ao
The CCBE considers thatChanged a satisfactoryto include
definition
certaAs of a lobbying
rule, anythat activityaddresses
f No opinion the abovementioned concerns is formulated in t
Where national registers are about
missing, the EUprovisions
Transparency Register should
It
The
theis current
unfortunate
PRCA has thatshould
long
register this Changed
arguedhas notcome
thatbethe toatUK
exclude
merelya timefocuswhen
Registercerta
onWe there
oflobbying, are but
Consultant
appreciate
law-making strong questions
Lobbyists
that
process,
should the Average
register
inmoveshould
particular, has
cover
to include the future
specific
should special
andremain
link and viability
political
under advisers
to
the ofscope
the(SPADs)
exempt EU ofto some
organisation
the as
regis thae
Changed to include certa Average
All organisations that currently fall under the scope of the register should rem
information on EU decision-making. Changed to include certalobbying to convince the Average institutions that they are indeed not lobbyists.
Preserved the same as currently Of particular concern for Oxfam No opinionas a development NGO are the firms working
No opinion Average
Oxfam welcomes the broad Changed to include certaFinally, some organisations, Averagelaw firms and consultancies, in particular, still ref
No opinion Average
Registration in the Transparency Register should depend solely on the nature
Changed to include certaIt There
is also is no rationale
essential thatfoallAverage
third country (ie those outside of the EU) governme
Transparency International welcomes the broad definition
The EUthe Transparency
of register
lobbyingapplies onRegister
which the
aimsEUto Transparency
make the refuse
influence
Register ofisinterest
built. represe
We consider that the defiChanged to include certa Finally, Good to law firms but many to register correctly,
The Register should continue to include all external Whereinfluence.
national As registers
such, third arecountry
missing, embassies
the EU Transparency
should be included Register onshould
the lista
needs more of interest Changed
The definition representation to include
should certa
not all
Allbeshould
madebe
organisations any in more
it that restrictive.
Poor fall
currently Transparency
under the scope International
of the register has observed
should rem ho
O registo
In light of theapenas
originaluma Changed
d of the Transparency
spirit to include certa Register,Toda eorganisations,
Some qualquer
Transparency activid law Good
International
firms and consultancies,
reiterates that the in particular,
current register still refuseshouldto s
Changed to include certaIMir thinksind the register
keine Grnde shouersichtlich,
Good die allgemeine Ausnahmen rechtfertigen w
Changed to include certaFalls es solche Grnde im Average
Einzelfall gibt, knnten sie ja anstelle detaillierter A
pour certains groupes l'i Changed to include certaPlus aucune exclusion Average
"Jegliche EinflussnahmeChanged to include certaIm Rat oder ZT auch im Parlament Average vertretenen Einrichtungen spielen als Mitg
Changed to include certa Som
Kirchen
The current definition of lobbying is not precise enough and does not provide sufficient registret
und r idag
ReligionsgeGood uppmanas kommuner och deras
legal certainty. sammanslutningar
There should be a new att
The current definition does not offerthe a sufficiently Sverige har inte
clear exemption for legalGood ett hierarkiskt system mellan kommun och
work that is a legitimate business activity for law firm landsting/region. D
Preserved same as currently
- contacts with public No bodies to better inform clients SKL anser drfr
about a general att det r
legal fel att gra tskillnad av demokratiskt folkvalda int
opinion Die derzeitige Regelung, diesituation
Good die Kirchen or theirundspecific legal position, or toaus
Religionsgemeinschaften advis d
- advice given to clients to help them ensure their Frbundet
activities anser
comply att kommissionen
with the relevant skyndsamt
law undantar kommuner och dera
Changed to include certaVertretungen CECCM
Pon samma supports und Krperschaften,
stt som a mandato Average
medlemsstaternas
Bros und Netzwerke, die geschaffen wurd
representationer, regeringar eller nati
-Bardzo preparation of ciseChanged
analyses and studies for clients den theRejestrem
potential
EU-Organen zuimpact of opinion
reprsentieren,any legislativesowie ihre or regulatory
Verbndechanges erfasst, with wird regard
sowoh
wane jest to exclude certa O
SKLbjcievill pminna Rady
kommissionen No om att kommuner och landsting/regioner r e
- representation on behalf of clients in the context of a conciliation
ffentlichen Kontrolleorderjenigen, mediation die procedure
im Umfeld to prevent a dispute from
der europischen being
Institutione b
- Changed to exclude
activities relating to litigation on behalf of clients, certa particularly the No opinion
Selbstverstndis derexercise
Kirchen of und theReligionsgemeinschaften
fundamental right of a client to a fair trial,
gerecht.
- work that directly relates Preserved the same
to a specific legalasor currentlyadministrative case or procedure Good which does not seek to change the existin
Also, the definition should Changed
not include to include certain
the actions of types
an of
individualentitiesor (pl
organisation
Die aktuelle Regelung spiegelt die Vielfalt von Average responding to an approach
Kontakten gutbywieder,
a public diebody
die E t
In light
Es wreofangemessen,
the above, weden Changed
welcome the
to include
Councilcerta
Anwendungsbereich of des
Europe We Registers
think
Vertreter definition:
thatden
zu the
auch lobbyinGood
lobbying
auf den means
gesellschaftlichen Ministerrat promoting
Gruppen specific
als Mit-Gesetzgeber
und interests byunterhalten.
Organisationen communica
auszudehnen. Preserved the same as cdass diese vielfltigen Kontakte, Good transparent sind.
Changed to include certaAll the above. Governmen Good
Die interinstitutionelle No opinion Poor
Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR), and its members fu
Die interinstitutionelle No opinion Poor
Changed to include certain Furthermore, we see thatPoor
types of entities (pl the Register is incoherent in its approach in that re
Changed to include certaAs Derlegitimate
DZV untersttzt actors in einEuropean
Average governance and recognised by EU Treaties
The definition needs to Changed to exclude certa Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl No opinion
The TR after the last revision widened the scope of those covered: this was a positive move. However, it is NOT true to say it c
Despite the attempts of the Changed
Commission
to include
to clarify
certaTransparency
the meaning of does
some notlobbying
sto
Good activities in the guidelines, there still remains
It should also cover all Changed to include certaIt should include ALL entAverage
The EU Transparency Register aims to make the influence of interest represe
Transparency International Preserved
welcomes thethe
same
broadas definition
currently
We do not
Where ofsee
national aregisters
lobbyingreason Average
to
on which
areexclude
missing,
the EU any types
Transparency
the of entities
EU Transparency fromRegister
Register the
is TR. should
built. All intera
Changed to include
The Register should continue to include all external certain types of
All influence. entities
organisations As such, (pl Average
that currently
third country
fall under
embassies
the scope
shouldof the
be included
register should
on the rem
list
We
The support a strong
definition andChanged
of interest to include
representation shouldcertaMoreover
not
Some
be made some
organisations,entities,
any more law Good
like
restrictive.
firms law firms,
and are often
Transparency
consultancies, not
in registered
International
particular, haseven
still if theyto
observed
refuse hoars
In light of the original spirit
Changed
of the Transparency
to include certaRegister, Transparency International Average reiterates that the current register should
No opinion All churches and religious Good
communities, political parties, third country govern
No opinion Furthermore, the lobby firms, No opinion
PR firms and law firms employed to lobby the E
Die
The interinstitutionelle
current definition ofVereinbarung
Changed tozwischen dem
include certa TheEuropischen
register applies Parlament
to law Good und der
firms but Europischen
many refuse to register correctly, althoug
Kommission enthlt bereits
Die bisher geltenden VerNo eine sehr weite Definition der Ttigkeiten, die unter
opinion Poor das Register fallen.
Problematisch ist, dass Organisationen bei ihren Registereintrgen offenbar teilweise von einer engeren
Il serait utile aussi d' Changed to include certaDans le but d'obtenir uneGood
Definition ausgehen. Folglich ist eine Vergleichbarkeit der Daten im Register nicht gewhrleistet. Die EU-Institutionen sollten a
This is a complicated
Einklang quePreserved
mit den Leitlinien the same as cOne of the moststehen,
des Transparenzregister-Sekretariats positiveGood
d.h. die bereitgestellten
Die interinstitutionelle No opinion
Informationen nach bestem Wissen vollstndig, aktuell und nicht irrefhrend Poor sind. Das gegenwrtige
Ungleichgewicht mindertNo dieopinion The activities
Vergleichbarkeit, schadet related to
dem politischen ZielAverage
der Transparenz und fhrt zu
einem einseitigen Blaming No opinion
derer, die sich compliant verhalten. Poor
Changed to include certaLe Kommunalbehrden undGood
principe de registre, Kommunalverbnde sind Regionalbehrden und de
Preserved the same as currently
Das Register sollte
Die gewhlten in sich
VolksvertreterPoor
kohrent sein.
in lokalen Es kann nicht willkrlich eine staatli
Behrden/Gebietskrperschaften neh
Changed to include certaWenn ESTA supports
regionale a mandator
VertretungenAverage und Verbnde sowie diplomatische Vertretunge
Mit Blick u. a. auf kommunale Resolutionen, Konsultationsbeitrge, Delegatio
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen
Registers fhren haben
wrde.sich Good
Aus in den europischen Vertrgen
verfassungspolitischen (siehe u. selbst
a. Art. verpflichte
4 und 5
In den Leitlinien zur i Changed to exclude certa sowie der VereinigungenGood und Netze, die zu ihrer Vertretung gegrndet werde
Changed to include certaAll non-State actors shouAverage
Additional guidelines shoChanged to include certaAll organisations engaged Good
See attached written su Changed to include certaSee attached written su Average
Changed to include certaIt should also be record Poor
No opinion Poor
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
ALTER-EU considers that all churches and religious communities, political pa
No opinion Average
This includes informal Changed to include certaIItdo not see
is also why, apart
essential that Poor
Transparency International welcomes the broad definition of lobbying onall thirdthe
which country (i.e. those outside
EU Transparency Register of the EU) governm
is built.
Changed to include
The Register should continue to include all external certaWe see no
Theinfluence. good
EU Transparency reason
As such, third G
t ood
Registercountry
aimsembassies
to make the should
influence
be included
of interest on the
represe
list
The definition of interest Changed to include
representation shouldcertain
not
Where
betypes
Furthermore,
made of any
entities
nationalthe more (plrestrictive.
register
registers No
are opinion
applies to law
missing, thefirms
Transparency but many refuse
EU Transparency
International has toobserved
register
Register corr
shouldhoa
The definition
In light of lobbyin
of the original Changed
spirit to include certa
of the Transparency Register,
All organisations
Transparency No opinion
that currently
International fall under
reiterates
the scope
that theof current
the register
register
shouldshould
rem
Changed to include certaSome organisations, lawAverage firms and consultancies, in particular, still refuse to s
No opinion Good
Changed to include certaDada a definio do pontGood
Changed to include certaThe register should applyGood
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
Changed to include certaToutes les entits cherchGood
Preserved the same as currently Average
Changed to include certaMonost registracije naj Average
Changed to include certaTroverei opportuna l'applGood
Changed
The Interinstitutional Agreement to include
between thecerta Lobist je
European vsak, ki lahko
Parliament and the Average
European Commission already contains a very wid
Changed to include certaqualunque portatore di i Good
The Joint Transparency Register
ChangedSecretariat
to include certa
staffing
It
Theis should
acitizen
matter therefore
of perceive
will equalitbe increased.
Poor
as legitimateThisanwould helpiftoit deploy
influence effective enforce
is representative of it's
All organisations engaged Changed to include certaThe All EU Transparency
organisations engaged Register
Good aims to make the
However, not every citizen feels like he or she is represented into influence of interest represe
the Europe
Transparency
I'm wishing it isInternational
! welcomes
Changed the broad
to include definition
certaTherefore, of access
lobbying toon which
specific the EU Transparency
Goodinformation is mandatory Register
to allowis said
built.citizens t
Where national registers are missing, the EU Transparency Register should a
Changed to include certaTutti i soggetti che inte Good
The Register should continue to include all external influence. As such, third country embassies should be included on the list
Changed to include certain All types of entities
organisations (plcurrently
that Good fall under the scope of the register should rem
No opinion
The definition of interest representation should not be made any more restrictive. Good Transparency International has observed ho
Preserved the same as currently
Some organisations, lawAverage firms and consultancies, in particular, still refuse to s
In light of the original spirit
Changed
of the Transparency
to include certaRegister, Transparency International Average reiterates that the current register should
Changed to include certaDie Any Registrierung im Lobbyregister
entity representing sAverage sollte ausschlielich davon abhngen, we
Preserved the same as currentlyEs ist noch dazu essentiell, Good dass alle Regierungen von Drittstaaten (also Staa
Changed to include certaA requirement should beAverage i
Die interinstitutionelle No opinion Letztlich gilt das RegisterPoor auch fr Anwaltskanzleien, von denen sich nicht all
Wir sind der Meinung, d Changed to include certa Average
Changed to include certaThe Associazioni
Register religiose,
should include p Good all organisations engaged in any activity conside
More than influence poli Changed to include certa Average
Avec le Conseil des Communes et Rgions Europennes (CCRE-CEMR) et
Changed to include certaAny party that is not ei Poor
The Register should alsoPreserved the same as currently Theoutre,
En specificity
nous of socialque
voyons Good
partners ans social
le registre dialogue activities
est incohrent dans sonshould
approchebe fully
dan
No opinion The same goes for activities Averagewhere the European institutions are demanding
La dfinition doit tre Changed to exclude certa L'Union europenne doitAverage faire tout son possible pour assurer un dialogue ouv
The Register should be based No opinion
on precise definitions EFPIA supports aasreform Average
t is considered lobbying and what is not and what
Thethat are clear
specificity of some to what
organisations, such as BUSINESSEUROPE, our umb
Preserved the same as currently Good
recognised by the European institutions. All activities carried out under
We can't
The control
current the acti
definition doesChanged
not offerto ainclude certaTo
clear exemption me,for
Social every
workorganisation
Dialogue relating Athe
verage
shouldtocontinue defence
to beofexcluded
clients individual rights before
from the scope the Co
of the registe
Preserved the same as currently Good
The same goes for activities where the European institutions are demanding
1. Contacts
UNESPA with officials
believes that theto better
No opinioninform clients if input,
a particular legal or administrative
data, examples Average
etc, step is appropriate
to the organisation concerned, andoradmissible
where they in invite
the e
No opinion them to hearings, meetings, Averageseminars or other events.
2. Advice given to clients to help them ensure their activities comply with the relevant law in collaboration with outside Counsel
AmCham EU would like to Changed to include certaAmCham EU believes that Average
3. Preparation of strategyNo opinion
notes for clients on the potential impact of any legislative Good or regulatory changes with regard to their
The definition should be Changed to include certaAll bodies having activi Average
The definition of
4. Processing anddirect a Changed
sharing to include
of sensitive certa
business Any entity
secrets andcarrying
confidential out adocuments
Good relating to individual procedures
No opinion Good
Die BRAK begrt, dassChanged to include certa
die Interinstitutionelle The same obligations
Vereinbarung (IV) in Art.shou 10Average
eine Ausnahme fr die rechtsberatende Ttigkeit vo
No opinion Good
I rappresentanti dei governi e delle assemblee legislative regionali non dovre
So liegt anwaltliche Ttigkeit vor, wenn
Changed der Anwalt
to include certa fr seinen
ItIntegrity
should be Mandanten
about the w in
Goodeineril contributo
konkreten regionale
Rechtsangelegenheit eine Vorschr
The OECD in its Principles for Transparency andSi osserva, in per converso,
Lobbying che
states that definitions alle politiche
of lobbying europee,
and lobbyists neee
La definizione appare esPreserved the same as c Average
Auch die Vertretung rechtlicher Interessen des Mandanten gegenber den EU-Institutionen im Rahmen der Anwendung beste
Das Kapitel
Overall, "Muss
we take theich
viewmChanged to exclude certa
that the Transparency D
Wieiedetailed
gewhlten
Register
As definition
unter Ziffer Volksvert
in our is,
response
1.1.b Good
content
gezeigt, above
wise, fit
in for
ist eine 1.2purpose,
and 2.1, nevertheless,
Koordination we
derbelieve thatthe
Politiken the
im scope
scopeofo
Mehreben
Changed to include certa sollten unter Good
Jede andere Ttigkeit des Anwalts gegenber den EU-Institutionen, die nicht die Vertretung rechtlicher Interessen sowieverfas
Deshalb Beachtung der demokratischen Legitimation und die A
About "no matter where tChanged to include certaDurch Any kind eineof Ausnahme
entity entit vom Average
Transparenzregister und Einrichtung einer separa
Zurdiesem
In Klarstellung
Sinne knnte
regt die Changed
BRAK an,toausdrcklich
exclude certa EUArt.
in bzw.
10 deren Gremien Average
IV klarzustellen, unddassBehrden
bei Fragen (siehe
zur unter Ziff. 1.1.b).
Auslegung bestehenden Rech
No opinion No opinion
Changed to exclude certa To exclude Regional publi No opinion
No opinion Good
While this statement mayPreserved the same as currently Good
Der RAK begrt, dassChanged in der Interinstitutionelle
to exclude certa ToVereinbarung
exclude Regional (IV) inpubli
Artikel 10 eine klare Ausnahme fr Ttigkeiten im Zusa
No opinion
Bedauerlich ist allerdings, dass diese Ausnahmeregelung
Changed to include certaBASE indessen
dfend nicht ausreichend
Average au klar formuliert ist. In der Praxis wird dies
Le registre faitlesens
principe
s'il sapplique plus grand nombre. Nous proposons d'i
We consider that the defiChanged to include certaFor - Lesthe sake ofdiplomatiques
missions transpareGood
Um dies zu gewhrleisten msste von der Europischen Kommission eine przise Definition festgelegt werden, welche Aktivit
Preserved the same as currently- Les associations religieuses Good
Il
Il nous paraitTtigkeit
Anwaltliche
conviendrait ncessai liegtChanged
de distinguer etwa
avecdannto include
plus vor,
de wenncerta
clart - Les
der
l'activitautorits
Anwaltquifr rgionales
seinen
ressortit Good du
Mandanten
au domaine in einer konkreten
"plaidoyer" Rechtsangelegenheit
qui correspond plus propreme eine
More clarity/guidance is No opinion
Une distinction pourrait mriter d'tre apporte cet gard. Good
Auch
Le die Vertretung
Projet rechtlicher
de recommandation ChangedduInteressen
to include
Comit des
des certa
Mandanten
Transparenz
Ministres
Le aux gegenber
Registre sollte
tats
ne devraitsowoNo
membres den
pasEU-Institutionen
opinion
relatif
pouvoir latre im Rahmen
rglementation
ouvert aux entitsder qui
juridiqueAnwendung
des beste
sontactivits
des drivde
Toutefois, il semble que le Changed
terme "influencer"
to exclude pourrait
certa tre heureusement remplac Average dans le cadre d'une dfinition propre au Re
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
Preserved the same as currently Good
No opinion The specificity of some Average
While the definition see Changed to include certaWWF believes that all entGood
Changed to include certaPeriaatteena tulisi olla, Average
No opinion Good
No opinion Good
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
ALTER-EU considers that all churches and religious communities, political pa
It is also essential that all third country (ie those outside of the EU) governme
Furthermore, the register applies to law firms but many refuse to register corr
No opinion Registration
More information in thehere: Good Register should depend solely on the nature
Transparency
Preserved the same as currently Good
http://corporateeurope.org/pressreleases/2015/01/european-pr-firms-whitewa
The definition of lobbyin Changed to include certaAll churches and religious communities, political parties, and regional and loc
Average
No opinion Average
It is also essential that lobby firms, PR firms, and law firms employed to lobby
Die interinstitutionelle No opinion Average
No opinion Finally, the register must Good ensure that all law firms correctly register any lobbyi
Geelmuyden Kiese findsChangedt to include certaGeelmuyden Kiese believe Good
Changed to include certaThe Usually one couldStandards
International say thAverage for Lobbying Regulation do make an exception f
The definition of lobbyi Changed to include certa Good
ALTER-EU considers that all churches and religious communities, political pa
Although we fully agree No opinion Many of the entities lis Average
Changed to include certathe It is register shouldthat
also essential applallNo opinion
third country (ie those outside of the EU) governme
Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Good
The definition of lobbyin Changed to include certaFurthermore, it is imperative Average
to find a solution so that law firms which lobby jo
The definition of activit No opinion Good
Changed to include certaVe registracij vseh sub Average
De Vlaamse Regering is van mening dat het toepassingsgebied van het regis
Changed to include certaIf transparency needs to Good
The Register should be eChanged to include certaOutside Net zoalsofde public
Raadadminis Average
van Europa definieert de Vlaamse Regering lobbyen als
Kje je lonica med lobi Changed to include certaDodati vico in vse dra No opinion
No opinion Wanneer lokale overheden Gooden hun respectieve koepelorganisaties als lobbyg
Changed to exclude certa No opinion
Preserved the same as currently Good
No opinion Average
Preserved the same as currently Good
We believe the definitio No opinion Average
Insurance Europe believe No opinion Average
Excluding certain activit No opinion Although
Creemos que la definicin es adecuada pero que en la prctica se ha hecho we express no Good
o desproporcionadamente extensiva a actividades
As, entendemos que noNo pueden
opinion
ser incluidos como actividades de lobby Good el proporcionar informacin a las instituciones como
Under the current scope Changed
o to include certaToAll maintain
citizens, NGOs, businGood
a balanced approach between transparency and efficiency the sy
Man inclusion
The knnte noch
of allergnzen
No opinion
organisations representing anHearings
interest isand
somewhat
other events
To maintain a balanced approach Average
unrealistic.
are anTheexample.
current
between It register
currentlyhas
transparency allows
reached
and individuals
the right
efficiency with
the b
sy
However,
The FEDMA
inclusion of allconsiders
Preserved
crucial
organisations the
for pan
same
representingEuropean
asancHearings
Moreover,
trade
interest a
association
isand balance
somewhat between
toGood
other events beare
registered
transparency
unrealistic.anThe in theand
example.
current ItTR. accountability
As constantly
register
currentlyhas
allows can
reachedactive
be part
reache
individuals
the rightofb
with
However, FEDMA considers Preserved
crucial the
for pan
sameEuropean
as cMoreover,trade a association
balance between
toGood
be registered
transparencyin theand
TR.accountability
As constantlycanactive
be part
reacheof
Activities covered by th Preserved the same as cAs long as the current s Average
Changed to include certareligiose, politiche e dei Average
La dfinition est trop va No opinion All entities that carry out Good lobbying activities should have to register. Registrati
Kommunen, kommunale Zusammenschlsse und ihre Verbnde sowie deren
The definition included i Changed to include certaChurches Dengovernments
Kommunen and religious
und ihrenco
Average
kommunalen Spitzenverbnden
All including those from outside the EU shouldkommt
also beneben Bu
required
Changed to include certain types
Finally, of
Die demokratische entities (pl Good
it should be Legitimation
ensured thatund die firms
all law besondere verfassungsrechtliche
carrying out lobbying activities Ster
Changed to include certaAutoridades Pblicas ReGood
Changed to exclude certa Average
Changed to include certa Good
Changed to exclude certa We propose the exclusion No opinion
Financing should be inc Changed to include certaEverybody should be inclGood
AFA believes that the curNo opinion Good
Le champ dapplication des activits menant linscription au registre doit tre clairement dfini. Ce point est particulirement
Changed to include certaNo entity should be excluGood
Les termes plaidoyer et mise en uvre des politiques sont ambigus dans ce contexte, car ils dsignent galement cet
De plus, le paragraphe 7No de opinion
laccord interinstitutionnel considre mme llaboration Good de lettres, de documents dinformation, d
TheCNB
Le register doesn't
reconnat proles
que Changed to includeont
lignes directrices certa All mentioned
tent de rpondre groups
cesshproccupations,
Average mais elles lont fait sous la forme dun
Pour le CNB, le Projet dePreserved the same
recommandation duas currently
Comit des Ministres aux tats Goodmembres relatif la rglementation juridique de
Changed to include certaEn rgle gnrale, toute Good
No opinion Average
No opinion CSE sees no reason for Average the exclusion of certain entities and thinks all church
Changed to include certa Good
No opinion Average
There is still opportunity for opinion greater clarityFollowing
No bringing the rationale
to the definitions ofAverage
theand
of direct definition provided
indirect influence,in the
as previous
a great rangepoint,ofthere
activis
The Council of Europes Changed
draft definition
to include I
of lobbying
certaThe give you two
isintroduction
perhaps clearerexamples:
of a und
man
andAKommunalverbnde
verage
carries less risk of misinterpretation :Lobbying me
Kommunalbehrden sind Regionalbehrden
(Confindustria) und havede
Changed to include certa1. in Register
Italy, trade unions and the Employers Association b
The
Das Register should
sollte in appl A
sichverage
kohrent sein. Es kann nicht willkrlich eine staatli
2. in UK, the Transparency Register only requires lobbists working in consulta
Changed to include certaAller Wennofregionale
them Vertretungen No opinion
und Verbnde sowie diplomatische Vertretunge
Wre jegliche unmittelb Changed to exclude certa Die Institutionen
According haben vision
to a pluralist sich
Good inofden europischen
society, all interest Vertrgen selbst verpflichte
groups promote a particu
Die Anforderungen an diNo opinion If you are interested my PhD Averagedissertation is on the concept of Public Interest
Changed to include certaAttached you find a chapter Poorthat I wrote for a volume which is about to be pub
Changed to include certaAlle Einheiten und Orga Average
La Fdration bancaire frNo opinion Good
All entities that conduct any of the activities covered by the current definition
Changed to include certaShould include all, or e Average
Such definition seems unreasonably extensive. We do not believe that sending a position paper by email could be reasonably
Changed to include certaOnly Ein Register
entities sollte
that are in sinvolved
Good in policy making according to the Part Six Instit
Changed to include
It seems to us that such a wide definition would implycertain
CEEP types of entities
a tremendous (pl
believes thatworkloadchangesAverage
for
in the
bothexclusion
the institutions
regimeand should
the be
lobbyists,
implemented.
calling
A proper monitoring of t Changed to include certaTherefore, Regional authorities Good when acting outside their rights and duties as
A
Thisclear
is adefinition of the
complicated scope
Changed
question of
asthe
to activities
goodexclude certa
covered
arguments However,
for abymoretheumbrella
Transparency
limitedorganisations
Good
Register
definition representing
exist. is absolutely
The at necessary.
the European
wide definition of theWe level
believe
registers regional
that t
scope
However, as long as the Changed
register istonot
include
legallycerta
binding,
One of wetheagreemostthatpositiveGood
it is positive to have a wide definition, all activities carried
While DIGITALEUROPE Changed part to include certaDIGITALEUROPE strongly Average
b
No opinion Good
We believe the register Changed to include certain types of entities (pl Average
La definizione sopraindicata Changed to include
corretta, ma noncerta
Das Register sollte auf Average
esaustiva.
Il lobbismo per la nostra Preserved
organizzazione
the same
non as
si traduce
currentlysolo "nell'influenzare Average
direttamente o indirettamente l'elaborazione o l'a
Il est a noter que si la Changed to include certaIl est essentiel d'largi Average
If we understand it corre Changed to include certaAll entities should be regAverage
Preserved the same as currently Good
The EU institutions shouChanged to include certaUnless there are compelliAverage
The current definition of Preserved the same as currently Good
Changed to include
The Register cannot cover the whole spectrum ofThe certa At least,
indirect religious
Register
lobbying. commu
is notGroosrats Goodlobbying
comprehensive enough in terms
campaigns, of the
done by entities it includes
non-registered org
In order for this definit Changed to include certa Average
In conclusion, I would say, Changed
the Register
to include
has tocerta
cover
All the onlyorganizations
direct influence or and
Good contacts with EU officials.
Preserved the same as currently Good
Le registre devrait gale Changed to include certaLe registre devrait incl Poor
Changed to include certaThe register should
All organisations applyNo opinion
influencing EU decision-making sign up to the EU Transpare
What about the Council?Changed to include certaDie Registrierung im Lobbyregister Average sollte ausschlielich davon abhngen, we
Je suis inscrite au regi Changed to include certaIl Esest istanachronique,
nochdapplication inju Average
dazu essentiell, dass alle
Le champ du registre estRegierungen
actuellementvon Drittstaaten
satisfaisant (also Staa
lexception
Changed to include certaTo be added: regional puAverage
I have not notice really Changed to include certaLetztlich It
should
The Proposition
update include
gilt das
of n6 Public
theRegister
:present Good
Appliquerauch
IIAaux frEglises
shouldAnwaltskanzleien,
make etclear that von
communauts denen ofsich
religieuses
all levels public nicht
les all
m
gove
Wir sind der Meinung, d Changed to include certaLes Eglises et les communauts Average religieuses ralisent des oprations de lobb
Changed to include certaLes Eglises etofles
Associations communauts
regional Average religieuses non-inscrites
or local governments formed either devraient
including bnficie
private
One of the key reasons th Changed to exclude certa Average
3.1 What is your impres3.1 What is your impre 3.1 What is your impres3.1 What is your impre
Average Good Good Good
Average Average Poor Poor
Average Poor Average Average
Average Average Poor Average
Good Average No opinion Poor
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Average Average
Average Good Average Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion Average
Poor Good Good Average
Average Average No opinion Good
Average Good Average Poor
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Poor Poor Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average Good Good
Good Average No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor Average
Average Average Good Good
Average Good Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Good Average
No opinion Good No opinion Average
Good Good Good Good
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average Average
Good Average Good Average
Average Average Good No opinion
Average Average Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Average Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Average Good No opinion Poor
Poor Poor No opinion Poor
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Poor Poor Average Poor
Average Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Average Good No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Average
Good Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Good Average No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Poor No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Average Average Good Average
Average Average Good Average
Poor Average Poor Average
No opinion Good No opinion Average
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Good Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Average Poor Average Average
Average Good Average Poor
Average Average Average Average
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Good Average Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average Poor
Good Average Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Average Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Good Poor Good
Average Poor Poor Poor
Poor Poor Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Poor Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Poor Poor
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Poor
Average Average Average Average
No opinion Good Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion Average No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Average Average Average Average
Average Average No opinion Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average Good Average
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Average Good Good Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Poor
Good Good Good No opinion
Poor Good Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Good Average No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Good Good Average Average
Good Average No opinion Average
Good Average Poor Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average Average
Good Good Average Average
Poor Poor No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Average Good Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Average Average
Poor Average Average Poor
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Average Average Good No opinion
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Poor Average Average No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Average Average
Average Average Poor Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Good Good Good
Average Average Poor Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Good Poor No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good No opinion
Good Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Good
Good Average Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good Average No opinion
Poor Average Average No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Good No opinion Average
Average Average Poor Poor
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average Poor
Good No opinion No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Good
Good Good Good Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Average Poor
Good Poor Average No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Average Average Average Average
Good Average Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Average No opinion
Poor Good Poor No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion Average
Average Poor Average Average
Average Average Average Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average Poor
Poor Poor No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Average Poor No opinion Poor
Poor Average No opinion Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Average Average Average
Average Average Average Poor
Poor No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Average Poor Poor Average
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average Good No opinion
Poor Poor Average Poor
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average Poor Average
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Average Poor Average
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Good Average No opinion
Average Average Average Poor
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Poor
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Good Average Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Good No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Good Good Average
Good Good Good Good
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average No opinion
Good Poor Poor Poor
Average Poor No opinion Poor
Average Poor Average No opinion
Poor Poor Good No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Good Average No opinion Average
Good Good Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion Good No opinion
No opinion Poor No opinion Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion Good
Good Good Poor Average
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average Average
Good Good Average Average
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Poor Poor Average Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor Average
Good Average Good No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Good
Poor Poor Good No opinion
Poor Poor Average Poor
Poor Average Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion Average
Good Good Good Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Average Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion Poor
Good Good Good Average
No opinion Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion Good
Average Average Average Average
Average Good Average Average
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Poor No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Good Average No opinion Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Average Average
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Good Poor
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Good Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Good Average Average Average
Average Good No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion Poor
Good Good Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion Average Good No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Average Average Poor Poor
Good Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
No opinion No opinion Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion Good
Average Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Poor Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average Average No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good Poor No opinion
Good Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Average Good No opinion
Good Poor Good Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average No opinion Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Average Average
Poor Average Average Poor
Average Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Good Good Good Good
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average No opinion Average
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Good
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Poor Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Poor Poor
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Good Poor Average No opinion
Good Average Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Poor Average Average Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Poor Poor Poor
Poor Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Good
Average Poor No opinion Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Average Poor Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Average Average Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Average Good Good
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Average Good No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Poor Average No opinion Poor
Average No opinion No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Good Good Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Good Average Good Average
Good Average Good Average
Good Average Good Average
Average No opinion No opinion Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Poor Average Poor Average
Average Average Average No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good Good No opinion
Poor Average Good Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Poor Average No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion Poor No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Poor Poor Good No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Average Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Poor Poor Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Average Average Good Average
Average Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Average
Poor Good Average No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Average
Good Good Good Good
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Poor No opinion No opinion Good
Average Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Average
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion Good
Average Poor Good Good
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Poor Average No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor No opinion No opinion Average
Poor Average Poor Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Average Poor No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good Poor No opinion
Good Average Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion Average Average Poor
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average Good
Average Poor Average No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Good Good Average Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Poor No opinion
Average Average Poor No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Poor No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Average No opinion Good
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Poor Poor
Poor Average Poor Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Average Average Average
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
No opinion Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
No opinion Average No opinion Good
Poor Poor Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Poor
Average Average Good No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor Average Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Poor No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion Average
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Good Good Good
No opinion Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Good
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Good Good Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Average Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Average Average
Poor Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Good Average Average Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average Average
Average Poor Good Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Poor No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average Good Average
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Poor Poor Poor
Average Poor Average Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion Poor
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Poor Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
Good Average Average Average
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Average Good No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Good Average Average
Poor No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Good Average Average Poor
Good Good Good Good
Good Average Poor No opinion
Good Average Poor Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Poor Average Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Good Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Average Average Poor Poor
Good Good Good Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Poor Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Good Average
Good Average Good Average
Average Average Good Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Average Good Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Average Average Good Good
Poor Average Poor No opinion
Average Good Good Good
Good Good Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Good
Good Average Average Average
Poor No opinion Average No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Poor
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Good Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average Average Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Poor No opinion Average
Good Average Good No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion Poor
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good Average
Good Average No opinion Good
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Average Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Poor Average Average No opinion
Average Poor No opinion Poor
Good Average Average Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average Good
Good Good Good Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Average No opinion Poor
No opinion Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Good No opinion Poor
Poor Average Average Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Good Good Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Good Average Average
Good Good Good Average
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion Average
Poor Poor Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Average
No opinion Good No opinion Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Poor
No opinion Good No opinion Average
Poor Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Poor Poor No opinion
Average Good Average Average
Average Good Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Good Average Average
Poor Poor Average No opinion
Average Good Average Average
Average Good Average Average
Average Good Average Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor Average Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Poor Average Poor Poor
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Poor Poor
Good Good Poor Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Average Average Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Poor Poor Poor Poor
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Good Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Average Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Average Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Average Average Average Average
Poor Average Average No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Average Good Average Good
Good Good Average No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good Average No opinion
Average Average Poor No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Average Good Good Good
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Average
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Good Good
Average Good No opinion Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good Good Good
Good Average Poor Average
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good Average Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Average Poor Poor Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Good Average No opinion
Average Poor Good No opinion
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Average Good Poor No opinion
No opinion Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good Average Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Poor Poor Average No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Good
Average Good No opinion Good
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Poor Average Average
Average Good Good No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average Good
Average Average No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Poor Poor Poor Average
Average Good Good No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Average
Good Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Average Average No opinion Average
Poor Average No opinion Poor
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good Good No opinion
Good Average Good Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good Good Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Good Average Good
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Good Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Poor Average Poor
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average Poor Average
Average Average Good No opinion
Good Good No opinion Poor
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average Average Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Poor Good Good Good
Good Good Average Good
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good Good Good
Average Average Average Good
No opinion Good No opinion Average
Average Good No opinion Good
Good No opinion Average No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Poor Average Good Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Poor Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Average Poor Good
Good Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Average Good Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good No opinion No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Average Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Good No opinion Average
Average Average Poor Poor
Good Good Good Average
Average Average No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Average Good No opinion Poor
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Good No opinion Good
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Average
Poor Poor No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Average Average Average
Average Good Average Good
Good Good No opinion Poor
Average Good No opinion Good
Poor Good Good No opinion
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Average Average Average Average
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Good Average Average
Average Good Average Average
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Good Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Good
Average Average No opinion Poor
No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
Average No opinion No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Poor Poor Poor No opinion
Average Good No opinion Average
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good Average Good
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Good
Average Good No opinion Good
Good Good No opinion Average
Average No opinion No opinion Average
Average Average Average Average
Good Good Average Average
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Average Good No opinion Good
Average Good No opinion Good
No opinion Good No opinion No opinion
Good Good Good Good
Average Average No opinion Average
Average Average No opinion Good
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
Good Good No opinion Average
Poor Average Average No opinion
Average Good No opinion No opinion
Average Poor No opinion Average
Average Poor No opinion No opinion
Poor Average No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good No opinion Good
Average Average No opinion No opinion
Poor Good Average Average
Poor Average Poor Average
Comments or suggestions Final(Optional)
comments or ideas Do you want to proceed1.1 The Register invite
No
Yes No
No
Yes No opinion
Yes No
No
No
Se podra hacer ms atraAdjunto un documento so Yes No opinion
No
Yes No
Yes Yes
No
I would add a "how to naSeriously ... no one shouNo
No
No
Yes No opinion
No
No
Yes No
No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes No opinion
Yes No
Yes No opinion
Links to sponsored projects or parties would be vNo
No
Yes No opinion
No
No
No
No
Public bodies like the EUNo
No
Yes No
Money is important. Big No
Yes Yes
No
In my comment to 1.1 b) I made a reference to the ongoing TTIP negotiations and the precautionary p
Zur Vollstndigkeit der Informationen: FinanzquelYes No
The language the entity The Registry, to be effic No
Many consumer groups are rightly concerned that the TTIP negotiations may produce regulations tha
L'Europe peut vivre san No
Viewed in this light (whichYes
is not to acknowledge that
No there aren't other perspectives), I think TTIP neg
No
No
No
Die Einfachheit der Suchfunktionen sollte erhalteYes No
Adapter les documents et fonctions tous suppoNo
No
Yes No
No
The EU should implement Yes No
No
No
La communication et la pdagogie vis vis des citoyens europens reste a amliorer parce qu'inexist
No
No
Yes No
when representant registyou should watch this vi Yes No
Yes
Strong measures (prevention & sanctions) must be Notaken to ensure the "ethical" part of the definition g
The best solution in my opinion
No would be to find alternatives to lobbying. Such as public discussions /
Yes No
No
das kann ich im Moment nicht beurteilen, das wirNo
Yes No opinion
Plus ergonomique. Par ailleurs, ce serait No
Plus ergonomique. Par ailleurs, ce serait No
Yes Yes
Il manque une sorte de tBonne initiative a rendreNo
the parliaments and governments of EU Member states have to be forced to adopt a lobbying register
No
Companies have to be enforced to give better information about their activities.
We don't know wich enterIt's a great ide ton cons Yes have to be in place.No opinion
If they fail to do so, penalties
The register has to be mandatory
Yes for everyone. No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes Yes
No
No
The lack of meaningful open data offered by the tYes No
Yes No
No
Yes No
I thnik the lobbies shou No
' No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes No opinion
il est trs important de Yes No
Yes No
No
No
No
Yes No
Por favor, el TTIP influ No
Yes No
Una volta ottenuta la regiYes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
A maps (like webgis) of all the organization will Yes No
No
Those lobbyists willing t Yes No
Yes No
Lorsque pour une Directiv Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
No
with an approaching UK No
No
Yes No
No
No
Yes No
Debe haber un apartadoYes p No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes Yes
Yes No
J'UTILISE TRES PEU CA FAIT DES ANNEES No
Tous les registres du moNo
No
Yes No
dans le cadre actuel de sDvelopper des centres Y des No opinion
all entries have to be presented in latin language Yes No
No
Il serait bien de pouvoir avoir le registre en catalan.
Il serait bien que le registre
Yesne serve pas qu'au parlement
Yes et la commission europenne mais aussi
Thema Menschrechte kn Yes Yes
Just had a look for the If the media don't watch No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
No
Yes No
No
No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No opinion
Yes No
Yes No
No
No
Yes No
Tutte le pagine del sito dovrebbero essere scritteNo
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Transparenz von allen SNo
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
possibility to register in the register if you are No
No
Yes Yes
Yes No
Some field are not mandatory. There fore the infoNo
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No opinion
No
Yes No
Yes No
da manche Angaben offen Register sollte auf jed Yes No
Yes Yes
Technically, the register Explain why some interesNo
Register should allow Search on policy domains an No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes Yes
Yes No
No
No
Yes No
Cannot search specific pieces of legislation and No
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes Yes
Yes No
Yes No
El principal problema de No
Yes No
Yes No
The website has some good Priorpoints in it allowslobbyists/interest
to Registration acc
No representatives should meet minimum professional qualification
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
No
No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Erweiterte Suchfunktion anbieten, z.B. fr Such No
No
No
Yes No
The problem in Portugal Yes i No
Yes No
Yes Yes
As I said above, this re Yes No
No
No
Opdel ift. registrering og sgning Yes No opinion
Yes Yes
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes Yes
The following solutions were No identified:
1. Implement strengthened incentives for registrants
Yes No
2. Allocate more resources to the Joint Transparency Register Secretariat
No
3. Run quality checks of the data introduced by registrants more often and also before publishing it
Une certaine modernisation 4. serait la bienvenue.
Introduce Yes
de-facto sanctions for misbehavingNo
5. Harmonise the Register with Member StatesNo
Yes
Yes No opinion
Yes No
No
La transparence doit se No
Yes No
Have not visited the website. Only this survey. No
No
Yes No opinion
No
Yes No
No
Yes No opinion
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
A certain level of minim No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes Yes
No
Yes No
No
Once there is a genuine Ndo
Carte Professionnelle + Sans Carte Professionnel No
Yes No opinion
Yes No
Yes Yes
No
No
Il a dj le mrite d'exist Une consultation publiquNo
Yes No
No
No
No
Yes No
No
Looks as this IS just a Register must show conta No
Yes No
Donnes incompltes Yes Yes
No
No
No
No
You should really hire some good web developersNo f
Yes No opinion
Yes No
ordinary citizens do not No
No
No
No
very messy design and colouring No
Yes No
No
Declaraao de presena,No
Yes No
I am a private individua No
Yes No opinion
Start to make a better jo Yes Yes
No
Yes No opinion
No
No
No
Es erscheint im uersten NoMae unlogisch und nicht zielfhrend, wenn staatliche Intstitutionen der NU
Wenn die EU den MultilevelNo Governance Dialog ernst meint, muss sie auch akzeptieren, dass die Kom
No
No
There should be a directo
Thank you for asking peoYes No opinion
Yes No opinion
No
Yes No
No
Stop allowing Commission Yes No opinion
The Register must remain Yes No
No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Le registre ne permet pas de savoir qui a fait qu No
Yes No
No
No
No
Yes No
No
Advertise proposed changes as a result of lobbyiNo
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes No opinion
Good to see the 'Lobby-is No
No
I don't know who is lobbying, I want to see who hNo
No
Yes No opinion
You are making up as a mo Europeans are not Americ No
No
No
No
No
The page is a bit overburdened, especially the s No
oldschool design. No
Yes No opinion
The EU website is somethi As I mentioned, transparNo
No
Yes No
No
For a site like this a mobile version is less import No
No
Yes No opinion
No
uneingeschrnkte TranspYes No
No
This design is frequently used by organisations. No
No
No
No
No
No
While transparency and a No
Do as startups do and aaDumb it down, include alNo
No
No
It looks like it was crea I love the EU and want t No
I did not know the website before - why? Yes No
No
Adequate but the designConsultations are good. No
allow these boxes were writing in to resize as wri No
Yes Yes
No
No
No
No
The option to search and sort by lobbying party No
No
No
No
It's clear who is lobbying but its not clear how t No
No
No
The layout is not ideal for a phone, a better lay No
No
Laat het beter weten dat No
No
Language: Even the non-standardized parts of anNo entry should be accessible in as many languages as possible - at the very le
No
For high-stakes entries (e.g. those where annual No costs related to activities covered by the register exceed 1.000.000 or othe
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Seems like the powers thThis should not pass un No
No
which politician did they talk to? what interests d No
Mahdollisuus koko rekisterin tai osan siit lataa No
As a web designer I found problems with the site,No namely it's out of date regarding modern standards of basic usability, and it's
No
No
The website needs to be more user-friendly to le No
No
I think that the search function could be much m No
No
design is poor and not Again this survey seemsYes No
No
No
No
No
No
Website voor de leek ov U merkt, ik ben wat cynisNo
No
No
Eine alphabetisch geordnete Liste aller registrie No
No
No
Your website looks over 5 years old and appears No a
You should at least be able to search interaction No
No
No
No
Yes No
No
No
It would be helpful if th No
No
No
Poor.website
The What isisneeded is a but
functional, live-stream.
not clear People
in what noYes
kinds of information can beNo opinion
found and where. The appearance is cluttered, bloc
As an example, it would be helpful if users using the Yessearch function wereNo given
opinion
example keywords or categories so that they
Yes No opinion
No
Yes No
No
No
No
I am a firm supporter of No
Haven't compared extensively enough regarding No the
Yes No
No
No
No
No
Tem que se alargar o regYes No
No
No
No
No
Yes No
Sera interesante difere Yes Yes
No
No
No
Categories / "genres" for searching. Example " No
On a desktop computer it works perfectly. The mobile No websites has some very light css bugs on my phone on the first page wh
No
I would mainly recommand Companies
extendingorthe
institution
pages of Noeach lobbyists groups to include what are the main points they argued upo
I would command the EUNo fo
Yes No
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
Yes No
Die bei der Suche angezLobbyarbeit soll in erst No
Yes No
No
No
No
It should be possible to Yes Yes
Yes No
User-friendliness of the website improved significYes No
Il est frquent que les c No
Yes No
No
No toda la informacin se encuentra traducida enYes No
In the interest of transparency, websites such as No
No
No
No
Yes No opinion
No
It is important you hear itItfrom
is important
my pointyou
of view
hearand
it from
thatmy
is of
point
a Peruvian
of view and
Citizen
thatwho
is ofloves
a Peruvian
his country
Citizen
deeply
who loves
and ishis
extremely
country
information, an (advanced)
rules
search
should
function
be sanctioned
should allow
subject
comparing,
to due process,
ranking,including
and visualizing
an independent body to rule on alleged
Dataforthcoming
The entered intoInter-Institutional
the TR should beAgreement, specific enough reviewingto provide a real picture
the functioning of the ofRegister,
the lobbying is a activities
unique op
The EU Transparency
We would welcome if being Register
Putting website
in
a member
In addition place should
an effective
of organisa
to the be Yes
above comments,thesystem
EU institutions
to motivate central
including about all organisations
hub for information
influencingon the
EU legislative
decision-making
Yesthe need for a legally-binding lobby register, furthe process toand
si
The availability of information All lobbying
Ensuring/ documents
that consultancies
the new
on the and lawcan
Transparency
register firms should
Register
be further be
covers required
improved all EU by tomerging
list not only
institutions or their clients
involved
connecting in the and the
existing
political revenu
informatio
decisio
I tried to find any info The
If thequality
EU does of the
notdatabecom inNo the lobby register is extremely poor and Transparency International estimate
There should also be more Designing
guidance
Submitting ainaccurate
robust
for registrants.
system
and /with
The better
introduction
or misleading legalinformation
definitions,
of automatic monitoring
must plausibility
be specifiedprocedures
checks
as an would
and
offence, sanctions
avoid common
that enc
punishable mis
by
The search function should All individuals,
Thesebe improved.
demands andare
To not
improve Yes
only the
supported ones
general
by over that
accessibility
67,000 No
are accredited
citizens
and to access
relevance
who have of the
signed EPour
displayed premises,
online
information, should
petitionan be listed i
(change.o
(advance
The Commission's lobbyYes meeting policy should beNo immediately extended so that no Commission offic
Moreover, the search function Make
The should
the negations
European beCouncil
granted onand the
a prominent
Inter-Institutional
Council areplace onAgreement
the main
significant page
as open
EU institutions of the and
and Register
transparent
the EUand lobby not
asregister
be
possible
partshould
of the be su
Finally, the
Aufbau undwebsite
Strukturshoulddes If aalso
registrant
Transparencyprovide isInternational
Transparenzregister-Portals usingaccess
easy a help
Yeshas of
to aactively
third
historic
sollten party
data toverbessert
followed
dringend (old conduct
No itswerden,
versions
negotiations lobbying
of theon
A series of detailed changes are required to the rules of the lobby register in order to further boost dat
it should
register)
previous
um to be Unfortunately,
IIAs.
enable specified so in these
comparison the
and TR.
mo
n
Fehlinterpretationen und reputationsschdigende
Lobby Yes
Berichterstattung zu Yes
vermeiden.
Der Aufbau und die Struktur desspending should be disclosed
Transparenzregisters sollten to the nearest
dringend 10,000werden,
verbessert euros. um Fehlinterpretationen entgegenz
All lobby consultancies Yeslaw firms should be required
and No
Eu-Logos Athna estime que le registre de transparence to list, alongside
devrait the specific
tre obligatoire lobbyorganisatio
pour toute revenue r
Insbesondere
mai consultatodie von
Die Verfgbarkeit Kategorien Vollzeitquivalent
All individuals
Informationen bzw.lobbying
Unterlagen (VZ)"
onNobehalfistundof Zahl der fr
a registrant
gegenwrtig beteiligten
should Personen"
be
alle eingetragenenlisted fhren zu nicht immer vergleich
Stakeholder
Missverstndnissen,
We consider the availabi wenn die Nutzer
Registrants nicht
should mit den
specify Yes Leitlinien
alldethird fr die
party Umsetzung
organisations Nodu which des Transparenzregisters
it pays through which it conducts its lobb
Aufbau und
vertraut sind.Struktur des De plus, il serait
Transparenzregister-Portals
Der Transparenzregister-Portal
Informationsgehalt
intressant
ber deneinen tatschlichen
signaler
sollten sur
dringend
personellen
laverbessert
fiche
Aufwand
registre
werden,
im
deumchaque
Zusammenhang
organisation
Fehlinterpretationen
mit EU
inscrite leur
und reputat co
Zudem sollte das Yes eindeutigen Hinweis enthalten,
No dass geschtzte Kosten frInteressenvertre
die EU-Interess
beteiligten Personen. Um Transparenz zu strken und Fehlinterpretationen zu vermeiden, sollte die Kategorie
Il est importantdie
Insbesondere deKategorien
garde Pour "Vollzeitquivalent
finir, il faudrait bien Yes garderund lesprit
"Zahl que la procdure
No dinscription ne devrait pas salourdir afin d
Zahl der beteiligten Personen" daher gestrichen(VZ)" und aktiv gegen der beteiligten
eine irrefhrende Personen"
Darstellung fhren
vonzu Missverstndnissen, we
The website has
Informationen ausbeendemimproved a lot since the
Transparenzregister durchbeYes Dritte vorgegangen werden. No
Das Transparenzregister-Portal sollte einen eindeutigen Yes Hinweis enthalten, Nodass geschtzte Kosten fr EU-Interessenvertretu
The Commission
Das and the Parliament
Transparenzregister-Portal sollteshould facilita
einen eindeutigen Yes Hinweis enthalten, Nodass geschtzte Kosten fr EU Interessenvertretun
Berechnungen zu Lobbying-Ausgaben einzelner Sektoren Yes methodische Schwchen No sowie verzerrte Ergebnisse enthalten. Ku
Yes No
No
In addition to the above comments, Yes including about Nothe need for the introduction of a legally-binding lo
Kategorie VI scheint b No
Effective data monitoring: The quality of the data in the lobby register is extremely poor and Transpare
Es ist sicherzustellen, No
It would besanctions
Improved appropriate t Yes data quality and registrations:
to boost No Submitting inaccurate and / or misleading
Yes No
No further
Aufbau undcomments. See
Struktur des Meetings attached with written
registered
Transparenzregister-Portals su No lobbyists:
solltenThe Commission's
dringend verbessert lobby
werden,meeting um policy should be immediately
Fehlinterpretationen und reputat ext
Insbesondere die Kategorien Vollzeitquivalent (VZ)" No und Zahl der beteiligten Personen" fhren zu Missverstndnissen, we
Das Transparenzregister-Portal Include the European
Die Transparenz
sollte einen Council, Council
dereindeutigen
poliYes Hinweisand permanent
enthalten, Nodassrepresentations:
geschtzte Kosten Thefr European Council and C
EU-Interessenvertretu
Yes No
Changes to the lobby transparencyAgreement,register disclosure requirements: A series
of theof detailedischanges
a uniqueare
did not have time to lookThe be moreforthcoming
clear and Inter-Institutional
comuni No reviewing the functioning Register, op
The EU Transparency Register
PuttingFinancial
website
in place disclosure:
should be Lobby
an effective EUturnover
thesystem should
institutions
to motivate beorganisations
central
all disclosed to the
hub for information nearest
influencingon the 10,000
EU eurosprocess
legislative
decision-making and nottoand acc
si
If I were a citizen with very little
Lobbyinterest issue in No All lobby consultancies and law firms should be required to list, alongside
The availability of information Ensuring/ documents
that the disclosure:
new
on the Transparency
register canRegisterbe further covers
improved all EU byinstitutions
merging orinvolvedconnecting in theexisting
political
informatio
decisio
There should also be more Many
guidance
Designing such
Lobbyists' consultations
fornames
a robust registrants.
system Yes
t with
disclosure:
The betterAll individuals
introduction No monitoring
lobbying
legal definitions,
of automatic on behalfprocedures
plausibility ofchecks
a registrant andshould
would sanctionsbe listed
avoid common that enc mis
IThe
have not seen
search and should
function red It. Ibe
These cannot
Disclosure
improved.
demands commentofare righNothrough
Tolobbying
improve
supported general third
by over parties:citizens
accessibility
67,000 Registrants
and relevance
who have should specify
ofsigned
displayed ourall third petition
online
information,party organisation
an(change.o
(advance
Moreover, the search function Makeshould
the negationsbe granted on the Yes
a prominent
Inter-Institutional theNo
place onAgreement mainopinion
page
as open of the and Register
transparentand not as be
possible
part of the su
Finally, the website should Transparency
also provideInternational
easy access Yeshasto historic
activelydata
followed
(old versions
negotiations
Yes of the onregister)
previoustoIIAs.enable Unfortunately,
comparisonthese and mo n
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
Dans un contexte o l'euYes Yes
No
Lobiranje je zame trenutnNo
Setup and structure of the Transparency Registers webpage should be improved as a matter of urgency in order to avoid any
The forthcoming Inter-Institutional No Agreement, reviewing the functioning of the Register, is a unique op
Register
The mora
In particular biti
EU Transparency tudi povezan
figures on Register
full-time z
Putting website
in tokami
placeshould
equivalents vpliva
andbeNo
an effective n thesystem
number EU institutions
of to motivate
persons central
all organisations
involved hub leadfor toinformation
influencingon the
misinterpretation EUlegislative
ifdecision-making
users are process toand
not familia si
Yes No
The availability of information
Registers webpage Ensuring
should / documents
that the
clearly new
on the
indicate Transparency
register
that
Yes estimatedcanRegister
be further
costs ofcovers
EUimproved
No all EU
lobbying byare
institutions
merging
captured orinvolved
connecting
more than in theexisting
oncepolitical
informatio
(doubledecisio
cou
No Comments Yes No
There should
No opinion also be
means: moreDesigning
guidance
featuTransparency, a robust
forbefore
registrants.
system
bein Nowith
The better
introduction
legal definitions,
of automatic monitoring
plausibility procedures
checks would and sanctions
avoid common that enc mis
The search function should be improved. To improve general accessibility and relevance of displayed information, an (advance
No
These demands are supported by over 67,000 citizens who have signed our online petition (change.o
Moreover, the search function should be granted No a prominent place on the main page of the Register and not be part of the su
Make the negations on the YesInter-Institutional Agreement No as open and transparent as possible
Finally, the website should Transparency
also provideInternational
easy accesshas No to historic
activelydata
followed
(old versions
negotiations of the onregister)
previoustoIIAs.enable Unfortunately,
comparisonthese and mo n
Yes Yes
Zustzlich zu den bereits gettigten Bemerkungen und Kommentaren, u.a. zur Notwendigkeit der Ein
Aufbau und Struktur des Transparenzregister-Portals sollten dringend verbessert werden, um Fehlinterpretationen und reputat
Yes No
Effektive Datenberwachung / Effektives Datenmonitoring: Die Qualitt der Daten im Lobbyregister is
-Insbesondere
Die Suchfunktiondie Kategorien Vollzeitquivalent
solle verbessert und sensibilisiertYes
(VZ)" No
und Zahl der beteiligten
werden. Personen" fhren zu Missverstndnissen, we
the website could be
- Eine Liste der letzten 100improved so
Verstrkte data
Registrierungenanalysis
Sanktionen wre i Yes
umhilfreich.
Datenqualitt
Die jetzige ListeNoist mit 10 Eintrgen
und Registrierungen zu frdern:
zuDie
kurz.
Angabe von falschen od
Das
- DieTransparenzregister-Portal
Seite mit Neuigkeiten ist nicht sollte einengenug
zentral eindeutigen
Yes Hinweis
im Portal. enthalten, Nodass
Die Registrierten geschtzte
sollten auf alle Kosten
Updatesfrunter
EU-Interessenvertretu
'Neuigkeiten' hinge
Treffen mit registrierten LobbyistInnen:
Yes Die Regelungen
No zu Treffen zwischen Kommission und Lobbyin
Al di l della obbligator No
The register website hasLobbying and transparency Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No
CIP encourages the Commission and Parliament Yes to facilitate the No
disclosure of memberships in EU structures and platforms (high-level groups)
Yes No
as well as to ensure a coherent terminology. It is often very burdensome and
Empowerment of the civilYes
difficult to collect all relevant information. To increase data reliability, No
EURALIA dfend les princYes
we recommend the EU institutions themselves should establish a fully No
The information in the Transparency Register can Yes
integrated, accurate database covering all EU advisory structures and No
platforms and to link it to the EU Transparency Register. Yes No
AmCham EU takes note of the Transparency Registe Yes No
Unless already aware of the existence of the Tra Yes No
A registry of the meetin Yes No
Yes No
We doubt the need to putYes No
Il giudizio sul sito web positivo:
To
- avoid misinterpretation,
concezione e struttura:therisultano
categorychiari
of "peop Yes
ed immediati; No si segnala lopportunit della presenza della m
quale suggerimento
- Yes
disponibilit di informazione e documenti: il sito fornisce informazioni; Noi documenti cercati risultano disponibili; si segnala
- Accessibilit: molto buono per cromatismi eYes No pu migliorare con l'aggiunta di scorciatoie da ta
semplicit di visione; il sito
La base giuridica del regNo
In sum, the Register website Die bisherige Unterteil
is a sufficiently No tool to work with and broadly achieves the desired objectives. Some info
effective
Yes No
I would like to mention and support below mentioned part of the statement of the Bavarian State Gove
No
siehe Ziffer 2.2 Unabhngig
"The Bavarian von einer
State Re No
Government takes note of the fact that, while regional authorities and their repres
of the Transparency Yes would be blurred if No
Register, contacts onthe
thestatement
level of states
I would like to mention and support below mentioned part of of theand governments
Bavarian fell
State Gove
Similar considerations apply No to German municipalities. They are part of the administration of the Germ
La Commission et le Parlement devraient
"The Bavarian facilite
State Yes
Government takes note of the Nofact that, while regional authorities and their repres
of the Transparency Register, No would be blurred if contacts on the level of states and governments fell
Similar considerations apply No to German municipalities. They are part of the administration of the Germ
BASE souhaite que le cad BASE attire lattention Yes Yes
Yes No
No
Yes No
In order to create a leve Yes No
Yes Yes
L'accessibilit par critr Le Registre doit avoir l Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
We encourages the Commission and Parliament Yes to fa No
Yes No
Sivustoa
CALIF pitisi kehitt
encourage niin, ett data-analyysie
la Commission et la ParlementNo faciliter la divulgation de l'identit des membres des structures europenne
CALIF encourage la Commission et la ParlementYes faciliter la divulgation deNol'identit des membres des structures europenne
Yes No
Yes Yes
1. The Joint Transparency Register Secretariat should be given stronger powers to enforce rules arou
Der VCI untersttzt folgende Vorschlge, die der BDI eingebracht hat:
International Standards for Lobbying Regulation recommend an independent, mandated and well-reso
Die Verstndlichkeit der comments,
Angaben
Yes from im
In addition to the above Registerabout
including sollte the
dringend
need forverbessert werden,of
the introduction um a Fehlinterpretatio
legally-binding lo
As the organizations coming a new memberNo state with absolutely no legal framework for lobbying
For citizens to
Additionally, know whoYesisalso
lobbying on which issues,
No it is essential the in
Secretariat actively monitorstaen
Effective dataasmonitoring:
Die Vergleichbarkeit the CSOs
der Daten operating
im Register
The quality in sollte
of the the wider
data in theregion,
dringend lobby especially
gestrkt
register werden. countries
Dazu sind
is extremely withinsbesondere
poor candidate
and Transpareu
As a watchdog organizati No
It is clear that the Register
2. website
The EU has Transparency
undergone Register
Yessignificant
should
changes
require
since
more
No it was
accurate
first launched
and detailed
Accessreporting:
Info strongly
Lobbyrecomm
spendin
Damit Transparenzvorgaben
Improved sanctions to boost Sinn quality
data machen, and mssen sie fr alle
registrations: Organisationen
Submitting inaccurate gleichermaen gelten:
and / or misleading
- The data in the lobby register should be available as open data (reflecting the spirit of EU Communication on Open Data of
Yes No
- A longer list of most recent
3. The registrants.
International Standards require lobbyists and public officials be subject to effective, proportiona
Meetings with registered lobbyists: The Commission's lobby meeting policy should be immediately ext
- Obligatory linking between entries, in particular, Yes where organisations areNo part of coalitions or associations that are also in the
- Greater linking should be Suchmade sanctions
between would Yespublication
proactive
encourage preciseof disclosureNo of data
Commissioner lobbyby meetings
providing andlobbyists
the register
with a disincentive
database.
Include the European Council, Council and permanent representations: The European Council and C
- Greater linking should be made between expert Yes group information and the Noregister database.
4. Given the important role Yesof national PermanentNo Representations in EU decision-making processes,
Changes to the lobby transparency register disclosure requirements: A series of detailed changes are
The new site is a lot eas In line with the Commis Yes No
Financial disclosure: Lobby turnover should be disclosed to the nearest 10,000 euros and not acc
Lobby issue disclosure: No All lobby consultancies and law firms should be required to list, alongside
No
Lobbyists' names disclosure: All individuals lobbying on behalf of a registrant should be listed
The register should be b Disclosure of lobbying Yesthrough third parties: Registrants
Yes should specify all third party organisation
Yes No
No
Yes No
It would be useful if the The extension of the scoYes No
Izvajanje nadzora in sanNo
Yes No
No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
It must be borne in mind that information in the Yes No
Yes Yes
Repsol anima a la Comisin y al Parlamento a que Yes No
Yes No
Unterschiedliche Interpretationen: Nach der let Yes No
Yes No
Centre Maurits Coppieters truly believes in the importance of the Transparency Register and in its role
Yes No
First of all, the non-mandatory nature of the register makes it less effective, particularly with regards to
The Register website is quite
Second, intuitive
the register
and user Yes
should
friendly be for
used
bothto registrants No
highlight whichand visitors.
kinds of However,
interests arethe represented
consultation andshould
havebethe
s
Also, users should have Finally,
the possibility
since theto sort
European No
out registrants
Union has byexpanded
category of itsfunding
scope and and activities,
level of spending
its importance
in lobbying
for lobbying
activities
a
L'ergonomie
Finally, du registre
the European Leconclusion,
dptshould
institutions
In de demande
thedevelop dehandbooks
Yes
d
Transparency Register
of concepts
needs someNothose
for further
whodevelopments
are interest in to bebecome
registered moreor efficient
are alre
Yes No
No
Yes No
No
No
CSE believes that the quality No of the data in the lobby register needs to be substantially improved. Acc
If the Transparency Register is a useful tool, AFA No encourages the European Commission and the European Parliament to mak
In addition, if the availability, the access
In order to improveand this,
the design
Yes are good,
systematic checks it must
on at be
Noborne
least 20%inofmind that information
the declarations must in be
thecarried
Transparenc
out ev
Yes No
In addition to making theNo register mandatory, so as to cover all those that engage in lobbying including
No
Anmerkung
We also support zu EU-Konsultationen:
the proposals of ALTER Eine umfassende
EU on concrete Analyse der Ergebnisse
changes von Konsultationen
to the information required: ist g
Yes No
Financial disclosure: Lobby turnover should be disclosed to the nearest 10,000 euros and not accordi
Un
Lobby registre
issuede
Grundstzlich transpareYes
wre es wnschenswert,
disclosure: All lobby consultancies Yeslaw firms
wenn mglichst
and zeitnah nachbe
should Ende einer to
required Konsultation die the
list, alongside eing
Yes
Lobbyists' names disclosure: All individuals lobbying No on behalf of a registrant should be listed
Aufbau und Struktur des Nicht klar istofbei
Disclosure allen Konsultationen,
lobbying Yes third parties:
through wie dieRegistrants
eingereichten
No Beitrge,
should specifyangegebenen
all third party Daten und Aussa
organisations wh
The quality of data need Yes Yes
Es ist von auen nicht nachvollziehbar, wie die Auswertung der ffentlichen Konsultationen durchgef
The EU Transparency
Anmerkung Register is already
zu EU-Konsultationen: Oftmals a machen
well-developed
wir die one. However,
Erfahrung, dassimprovement
die eingereichten can always
Beitrgb
Aufbau und Struktur des Es ist von auen nicht nachvollziehbar, Yes wie die Auswertung
No der ffentlichen Konsultationen durchgef
In addition to the alreadyYes made comments, the European No Youth Forum calls for:
Yes No
- The Council of the European Union to be covered by the Transparency Regime
- Yes
The introduction of a legislative footprint linked Noto any legislative production (draft texts, amendm
The Transparency Register - website
The EUshould institutions No
followpolitical
the following
representatives
guidelinesand to ensure
high-ranking
its accessibility
officials involved
to everyone:in policy making to
Kategorie VI scheint berdurchschnittlich
- The EU institutions viele political
No representatives and high-ranking officials involved in policy making to
Accessibility guidelines for - UN These
websites:
commitmentsYes from the EU institutions No should be part of a Code of Conduct annexed to an
The user interface is fundamental - Registered
for themeetings
successNo should directly link to the entries of the lobbyists in the Transparency Regist
http://www.un.org/webaccessibility/
-
Die Webseite und ihre Suchfunktionen To ensuresollten that thesobody Yes in charge of the Transparency No Register is fully staffed and with the appro
- Trilogues to be covered by the EU Transparency Regime
Yes No
Introduction to Web Accessibility:
We would recommend the We E fully support Busnin No
All these call and commitments reflect the EU treaties, especially:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php Yes No
- Article 112 TEU: Yes
The institutions
As conceived, the Register website offers great opportunities, with possibilities shall No ansuch
maintain open,as transparent
the search by and regular dialogue
organisations and thewithexr
Source: ENIL - European- Network Articleon 2981
Independent
TFEU:Yes InLiving
carrying out their missions, No the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies o
However, the lack of guidance on how to properlyYes fill the data leads to incoherent Yes data being filled in, impacting the efficiency a
Social Platform is currently in the process of finalising a position paper on 'civil society participation an
The website has been improved a lot since the beYes No
DIGITALEUROPE
Accessibility encourages
is a crucial To add,the
element of EU
we areinstitutions
any website,
a member Yes
forto dCivil information
ofmore Society Europe, No
we referseetotheir
ourseparate
member responseorganisation to the
the public
Europeanconsultati
Disab
Yes No
The register needs to beFinally, improved we ashave around
signed halfaYes
of
joint
theNGOentries
letter
arewith
problematic
Transparency
No according
International
to Transparency
'LobbyistInternational.
for Transparent Lo
No
Yes No
Il serait intressant au No
Yes No
In the Spanish version of the website, in the se Yes No opinion
It would be very helpful to be able to download the Yes information in the register Yesto be able to process it using Excel or similar sof
See attached files refer Yes No
The Inter-Institutional No
Agreement with regards to theleTransparency Register and the Code of Conduct
Le site web du registre devrait intgrer davantage de contenus. Cela aidera dcideur public disposer de la meilleure inform
Yes
Proposition n7 : Refonte dun portail de transparence facile utiliser aux contenus intgrs No
As portail
Le I have dualready stated,
registre It is clear that doit
de transparence the interest Yesof the EU
tre davantage citizens
simple is above
utiliserNo opinion
the interests
et accessible of EU lobbyists.
(user-friendly). Thus, the
Un portail Register
devrait a min
-The Le Registre de Die
transparence
availability of information Information
We believe tel quil
or documents estdarber,
that a dramatic No
actuellement
on the register (a)
overhaul avec
canof belintgration
theimproved
transparency doutils
by adding de
register gestion
more multilingues
is required,
informationin order (b);
from to
other
turndatabases
it into a fu
-LesLesinformations
Positions publiques
concernant desles organisations,
rencontres des des Yes
think-tanks et des dcideurs No publics (proposition n2) ;
- Les
As Consultations
a starter, publiques
the transparency
This de
It is importantla Commission
isregister
why, until
coulda mandatory
to stress europenne
be improved
No register ; is introduced,
to include also the listswe believe
of meetingsit is key
thattohigh-level
use all possible
Commission
incentives
offici
Es stimmt, dassdedas Portal
deEslades
stimmt,
Transparenzregisters
dass das PortalYesdes
- Les Feuilles route Commission europenne mit
; Transparenzregisters
dem Relaunch im Aprilmit2015
demverbessert
Relaunch im wurde.
April Trotzdem
2015 verbessert
mchten wurd
w
No
-There
Les Agendas des
is no informationdcideurs
about
WeMettre publics
accept thequi
the sanctions le souhaitent,
Commission's
placed o
on stance dont
lobbyists linstitution
thatwho dappartenance
a legislative
violate theact terms
remains le requiert
of thea lobby
possible ;
register
next step
on theif the
public
upcoming
websi
J'appartiens une catg1)
Die Suchfunktion solle verbessert
- du
DieParlement und
un niveau
Suchfunktion gNo
sensibilisiert
solle verbessert
- LObservatoire lgislatif europen ; werden.und Z.B. sensibilisiert
ergibt die Suchewerden. nach Z.B.'exxon'
ergibtnur
die zwei
Suche Lobbyfirmen,
nach 'exxon' dienurExx
z
The
Einedisclosure
Liste der of thede
fi The
neuesten -does
100
Eine register should
Registrierungen
Liste der also; Yes Yeshilfreich.
- Les
The Communiqus
search function alsopresse
Improvementsdesallow
not toneuesten
Institutions
forthe wre
ranking
level 100
ofhilfreich.
of Registrierungen
detail
the Die jetzige
various
included wre
Liste
registrations
in the ist
bymit
various 10Die
differentEintrgen
registrationjetzigeareListe
criteria, zu
alsokurz.
e.g. ist mit 10 Eintrgen
spending,
required. These zu sk
even ifinclud
you
- Die
Les Seite
Rseauxmit Neuigkeiten -- Die
ist Seite
sociaux (Facebook,
More nicht zentral
Twitter,
information aboutYes
mit Neuigkeiten
genug
Linkedin);imistPortal.
the nicht
link zentral
between genugNo
Die Registrierten
lobbying imincome/expenditure
Portal.
sollten Dieauf alle
Registrierten
Updates
and the unter
sollten 'Neuigkeiten'
auf alle
decision Updates
or process hinge
b
- Des
We Pages
also thinkdinformation
that more can tierces
- More gres
be details
done toaboutpar the
make les Yes
theorganisations
exact
register data :accessible
amount ofPartenariats, No
expenditure for Alliances,
persons
for example,Evnements,
with hearing,
NGOs readingPositions,
should be etc. difficulties
or required
other to list w
Idalement, le site devrait Legalement
portail de transparen
tre subdivis Yespar grands thmes etNo sous-thmes (par exemple : Dveloppement durabl
All data should be as machine Of course readable
it goes aswithout
possibleYes
saying
to allowthatcivil
the society
European and
Yes Council,
journalistsCouncil
to play andtheir
permanent
watchdogrepresentations
role effectively.s
Comments or suggestions
2.1 Entities
(Optional)
joining th Comments or suggestions
2.2 It(Optional)
is easy to provi
Fully agree The requirements for disclosure of financial data go too far. It is unacceptable
No opinion
Experience shows hat the main "consumers" of such data are 1) competitors
Fully agree Fully agree
Should the Commission think that access to such Information is necessary fo
Too much is asked Fully agree
Too much is asked Partially agree
Specifically, the phrase "If a company and its advisers are involved as a party
Too little is asked Partially agree
Too little is asked Fully agree
No opinion No opinion
Too little is asked Det er for let levere inf Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree
As a political party, it i Fully agree Partially agree
No opinion No opinion
Fully agree No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Too much is asked No opinion
Associations are asked for their turnover, but the large majority of association
Some organisations regisFully agree Associations should therefore
Fully agree
be required to provide their annual budget as w
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree
No opinion No opinion
Fully agree Partially agree
It should be MANDATORY
Fully agree Fully agree
We note that there are mToo little is asked End think-tank exemption:
Partially
Currently,
agree
think-tanks only provide general funding
Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Mehr unntiger rechtlich Too little is asked Siehe Teil A Nr. 1.1.c Disagree
Dennoch: ich bentige HiToo little is asked Es geht - s.o. - um die Partially agree
Too little is asked Fully agree
No opinion No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree
No opinion No opinion
Die BAK spricht sich insgesamt fr klarere Bezeichnungen der jeweiligen Gruppen und Sub-Gruppen aus, damit weniger Falsc
Als gesetzliche Arbeitnehmervertretung passt die BAK in keine der genannten Kategorien exakt. Die BAK ist zur Zeit in der Su
Fully agree Fully agree
Die BAK schlgt daher vor,
Tooeine
littleeigene
is asked
KategorieDie
fr fr
"Gewerkschaften
Lobbying einges
und
Fully
gesetzliche
agree Arbeitnehmervertretungen" zu schaffe
Some detailed changes need to be made to the overall rules of the register to
1) Financial disclosure: Lobby spending should be disclosed to the nearest 1
2) Lobbyists' names disclosure: All individuals lobbying on behalf of a registra
3) Disclosure of lobbying through third parties: Registrants should specify all
Using clear titles, acco Too little is asked Fully agree
Too much is asked Partially agree
No opinion No opinion
A series of detailed changes are required to the rules of the lobby register in
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Financial disclosure:Fully
Lobby turnover should be disclosed to the nearest 1
agree
Fully agree No opinion
Lobby issue disclosure: All lobby consultancies and law firms should be
Fully agree Fully agree
No opinion A series of detailed changes are required to ensure that the register presents
No opinion
Lobbyists' names disclosure: All individuals lobbying on behalf of a regis
Too much is asked Disagree
Fully agree Financial disclosure: Currently,
Fully lobby consultancies and law firms are require
agree
Disclosure of lobbying through third parties: Registrants should specify a
There are many organisat
Too little is asked Fully agree
Lobby issue disclosure: Currently all registrants are required to record the ma
My employer is an associa
Fully agree Partially agree
Too little is asked The information providedFully Ifagree
Lobbyists' names disclosure: the names of all individuals lobbying on behal
CEO has found amongstFully agreeanomalies and data inaccuracies in thePartially
the many register,agree
that a high number of general consultancy
Too little is asked Disclosure of lobbying through
Fully agree
third parties: Registrants should specify all thir
officials should provide that information as part of their entries on the register
The
The EU
scope institutions
and qualitythemselves
of thetoinformationcould alsothat provide additional
lobbyists information
are required or lin
DI welcomes further efforts create transparency of disclosed datato(e.g.disclos
cos
Too much is asked For
There large
shouldmultinationals
also be more Disagree
guidance for registrants. The introduction of autom
DI strongly advocates a register that lists the most important EU membership
Fully agree information to the entriesFully on the register:
agree
The approach is easy to understand and balances the Commissions intentio
Nous sommes une organisa Fully agree en complment
Recommendations
Another issue ofd'un concern codPartially
is the listing agreeof EU structures monitored by the orga
Fully agree - entries should be automatically Partially linked to information on grants received, the
Finally, some members of DI haveagree expressed concerns about art. 13 i.e. fund
Too much is asked In a reformed Register, Transparency Disagree International would like to see additiona
groups,
-The up-to-date the high-level
financial meetings with
information. the European Commission, contributions
Fully agree Federation of Enterprises Fully agree is inAllfavour
financial information
of further improvingon the theRegister
reliability,is cv
- information on revolving door cases. Entries should provide information on s
Fully agree -- information Partially agree
Section 2.2. specifically, and in our view entirely inappropriately For option foron
an instance, trade
which organisations
registrants to
associations
recognises thatupload offer
Regional
have beensuch
documents
a largepublic
suspended
variety of
authorities
or deregistered.
asactivities
policy
andpapers for their
their or lette
mem
represen
T
Der GDV bekennt sich grundstzlich zu
The EU institutions themselves could also provide additional information or lin Transparenz. Die zu Grunde liegende
The categories provided No by the
opinionRegister are generally We believe
accountability. good. thatAs too
However, much
it automatically
stands, isitasked
Transparency
Fully isagree and
impossible atolot
International toofsee
thewhoinformation
hasgrants
been asked from the
sanctioned. reg
For that reason we specifically request that the IIA - entries
In addition,
on should
the Transparency be
membership fees would
Register linked
and be
thereferred information
Guidelines to twice on as costs
specifically received,
say of
that:membe
The categories provided Too much
by the is asked
Register are generally-Beispiele
information
good. und Argumente
However,
on Partially
whichTransparencyhierzu siehe
organisations agree A1.2.
International
have been suspended
has observed or deregistered.
that a numbeT
has observed thatIIAa itnumber of organisations First,
categorise
There asking
should registrants
themselves also bewrongly.
moreto disclose
emphasis their on goals
ensuringand thethe required
remit of their organisat
information is
As part of a new should
Too little
be considered
is asked to
Representations of national, regional and local governments clearlyThere
Whilst
On separate
theweshould
otheragree also
corporate
hand,
and thatbe
theirwe more
the from
Fully
right
fully emphasis
non-commercial
agree
type of
support
associations the on ensuring
information
should interests
the
not fallisunder
Commissions required
by
required
approachmoving
the EU from information
the
shed subsec
toregistrants,
transparency is
light
Wepart
appreciate that Fully agree As
Leaving mentionedaside before,
that we the Fully
CCBE
fundamentally agreebelievesdisagree that the
withspecificities
theincluding
expectation ofeveryone
certain profe
that public
As of a new IIAthe Registers
it should scope extends
be considered to clearlySecondly,
be
A
to consultancy
automatic
separate
series
asking lobbyists
alerts registrants
corporate
of future,
detailed if fields as
from well
aretonon-commercial
arenot
estimate
as in-house
completed the percentage
lobbyists
with the their staff
thatnecessary
spends
diligence. from
onF
To COSLA and our membership Too much thisis distinction
asked 1.
The
plainly Inmakes
the
breath and allchanges
detail
no sense registrants
of
asPartially
the financial
a region required
should
agree
is no be to
information
less ensure
asked to provide
required the
of a democratically toaregister
be presents
listdisclosed
of maximum
elected tierbea
o
We believe that the Too much
transparency is asked
register should 2. Even
Finally,
level Membership
when
thewe data
playing
have fees
is
also
field (orDisagree
possible adistinguishing
previously
and proportional
to be provided
discussed calculation)
the design
organisations
how the should
and
disclosure
on the only
underlying be included
register
of financialassum
in such
dat
interests by moving the subsection Trade Unionsdescription and Professional
Recommendations of activitiesAssociations
and legislative either into files itsfollowed could be standardised wi
Too much is asked 3. an entity is financed No by opinionmore than 30% by a single registrant.
The
scope
Financial anddisclosure:
quality of the Lobby information
turnover that shouldlobbyists are required
be disclosed to theto disclos1
nearest
own category or integrating Tooitlittle
into isIII.
asked
Non-Governmental with
There
Thus,Lobby allshould
ongoing
organisations.
issue legislative
also be more
disclosure: Fullyfiles. agree
guidance
All lobby for registrants.
consultancies The
and introduction
law firms of
should autom
be
an entity which has only very few members, and where one (or two or t
categories provided
The classification does notbyconvey
the Registerto theare generally
wider public Recommendations
A series Lobbyists'
good.
the fact However
thatnames
the Oxfam
disclosure:
European has observed
All
Social individuals
Partners that a lobbying
number
are distinct on
of organisations
behalf
from of
other a regis
cat
interes
of detailed changes are required to boost data quality:
In
This a reformed
Financial Disclosure be Register,
woulddisclosure: of lobbying
easy Transparency
toCurrently, through
understand andthirdInternational
in parties:
line with would
Registrants
existing like to
should
principlessee additiona
specify
in the coa
lobby consultancies and law firms are require
We suggest
The to clearly separate
representativeness Too
of little
Social corporate
is asked from
Partners is fully -the
non-commercial up-to-date
documented,
serious financial
interests
problems
regularly information.
the by
Fullymoving
researched agree
overwhelming All
the financial
and subsection
majority
reviewed information
ofTrade
by on
Unions
associations
the the
European Register
and
and Profess
Commissi
compan is c
Lobby dossier disclosure: Unfortunately, this area of the register is poorly pol
-Lobbyists'
information on revolving door Allcases.
namesEntries
Too much is asked Disagree shouldoperating
provide information on s
names disclosure: of lobbyists on a registrant'
-Disclosure
an option of forlobbying
registrants to upload documents such as policy papers or lette
through third parties: Currently, registrants are required
The
End EU institutions themselves could also provide additional
provide information or lin
We note that there are mToo little is asked think-tank exemption: Partially
Currently, agree think-tanks only general funding
- entries should be automatically linked to information on grants received, the
The categories provided Too littleRegister
by the is askedare generally - information
good. However,
on whichTransparencyFully agree International
organisations have been suspended has observed or deregistered.
that a numbeT
As part of a new IIA it should Fullybeagreeconsidered to clearly Thereseparate
should also corporate
be more Fully
from agree on ensuring
emphasis
non-commercial interests
the required
by moving information
the subsec is
Die Eintragung in das Register und damit die "Offenlegung von Daten und Qu
Too much is asked No opinion
The way questions are formulated and even the guidelines encourage in prac
Fully agree Fully agree
Il n'est pas prvu de rub Fully agree Le
TheCNB a t
Der derzeitige amen
questions Umfang
on humancons
Partially
an agree
Daten sollte
resources nicht noch
dedicated weiter ausgebaut
to lobbying werden.
does not allow to aD
Fully agree We consider the Transpar Partially agree
Too much is asked Im Vordergrund
Furthermore we des Registers
believe Partially
that sollte
the agree
die in
entries Schaffung voncould
the register Transparenz undused
be usefully Nac
The category NGO is tooToo little is asked Partially agree
We agree that the right type of information is required from registrants to the
Der derzeitige Umfang an Daten sollte nicht noch weiter ausgebaut werden. D
Too much is asked Imaddition,
In Vordergrund des Registers
whereas Partially
details aresollte
agree
die Schaffung
published von Transparenz
of those individuals und an
who have Naca
Too much is asked Der derzeitige Umfang aPartially agree
Fully agree Finally, we question the relevance
Partially agree
of the requirement for consultancies to pro
Fully agree Information on grants anPartially agree
Fully agree Zustzlich zu den Ausgaben Partially agree Lobbying sollte auch angegeben we
fr eigenes
Too little is asked LobbyistInnen
Considering their specific role in the EU decision-making
We believe sollten
process,
that the
socialnicht
Fully
details nuragree
partners ihre
requested KlientInnen
should offenlegen, sondern ausweise
While DIGITALEUROPE believes that are
beunbalanced.
the included
right type ofin a
Thespecific
Transparency
information section, whic
Reg
is currently
Fully agree Though the Register alreFully agree
Also, the current divisionToo
in 5much
sections
is asked
and 15 mutually
We
We believe
wishexclusive
that subsections
forthat
to stress advocates
Disagree
trade is of
complex
transparency,
associations tooffer
handle,
aknowing
bothvariety
wide for
theregistered
issues on organis
which
of services to tha
Fully agree The information requiredPartially agree
Fully agree However,
More we do support
information should Partially
the Commissions
be asked agree goal to
with regards of NGOs
increasing transparency
resources, fo
to clarify
Fully agree Partially agree
Too little is asked The information about NGOs Partially
areas
agree
of work and fields of interest must be des
No opinion Good
Yes Average
No opinion Good
No No opinion
No opinion Average
No Good
No opinion Good
Yes Good
Yes Removal of the financial Good
No opinion Good
No Good
No opinion No opinion
Yes Good
No Good
No Average
No Average
No opinion Good
Yes mehr Abfragen zur vorhaAverage
No opinion Average
No Good
No opinion Average
No Average
No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion
No Poor
No opinion Poor
No Poor
Yes Average
No No opinion
No opinion Good
No Poor
No Good
No opinion Average
Yes Good
No Good
No Poor
No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion
Yes Good
Yes Average
No Average
Yes Good
Yes Good
Yes Good
No Good
No Good
No opinion Average
No Good
No opinion Good
No Average
Yes Good
No Good
No Good
Yes Good
No opinion Good
Yes Average
No opinion Good
No Good
No Good
Yes Average
Yes O Registo deve ser autoGood
No opinion Average
No opinion Good
facile oui, souhait et ef No Protger les donnes indi
Poor
No opinion Average
No No opinion
Yes Average
No opinion Good
No Good
No Good
No No opinion
No opinion Good
Yes Good
No Average
No opinion Good
No Good
No Average
Yes Good
No opinion Good
No opinion Good
No opinion Good
No Good
No opinion Average
Yes Good
No opinion Good
Yes Average
certain information requeNo opinion Average
No Good
Yes Average
Yes Good
Yes Average
No opinion Average
No Average
No Average
No Good
No Average
No opinion Average
No Average
No Poor
Yes Good
No opinion Average
No Average
Yes Poor
No opinion No opinion
see above re budgets Yes Avoid redundancy with otAverage
No Average
No Good
Yes Good
calculation of the financ Yes financial aspects Average
Yes Average
Yes Poor
Yes Poor
Yes An easier-to-fill-in form Good
Yes Average
No Good
Yes Average
No Average
No opinion Average
Problmes lis la bure Yes Average
No opinion Poor
No opinion Average
No Good
No Average
No opinion Poor
No Good
Les catgories demandes
Yes en ayant des termes plusNo opinion
No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good
Yes Good
No Good
No opinion Good
Yes Average
No Average
Yes Average
Yes Average
No opinion Good
No Average
L'information "nombre deNo
l opinion Poor
Yes Good
No Average
Yes Good
Yes Average
No opinion No opinion
No opinion Average
No Good
No Average
No Good
No Average
No opinion Good
No Good
No opinion Poor
Yes Good
No Good
No opinion No opinion
Yes Average
No Good
No opinion Average
No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion
No opinion Average
No Poor
it shouldnt be easy for No again there shouldnt be No opinion
No Average
No opinion Poor
No opinion No opinion
No opinion Average
Yes It should be easier to seeGood
No opinion Average
No opinion Good
Yes Good
Yes Good
No Poor
No Good
No Good
Yes Good
No Good
No Average
No opinion Average
Financial data cannot beNo Current requirements serAverage
Yes Good
No opinion No opinion
Yes Good
Yes Average
No Average
No Average
No opinion Good
No Good
No opinion Average
No Good
Yes Average
No Average
Yes Good
No Good
No Poor
Yes Average
No Average
No Once all information is coAverage
No No opinion
No Good
No Average
No opinion Average
No Good
No Good
Yes Poor
No Average
No Average
No opinion Average
No No opinion
No Average
Yes Good
No Good
No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good
Yes Good
No opinion Average
No Good
No Poor
It is challenging to deci No No opinion
No Good
No Good
No No opinion
No Good
No Average
No opinion Good
Die folgenden Reformen knnten die Offenlegungspflichten vereinfachen:
Yes Average
No Good
No opinion Good
Nie, nie jest atwo, po No opinion Nie wiem, jak uproci, aAverage
No opinion Good
No Good
No opinion Good
Yes Good
No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good
No Average
No Poor
Yes Poor
No opinion No opinion
No opinion Average
No opinion Poor
No Good
No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion
No Poor
No Poor
No Average
No opinion No opinion
Yes Average
No Average
Costs for carrying activi No Good
No opinion Good
No Average
Yes Good
No Poor
No Good
No Poor
No Poor
No opinion Average
Fr groe Organisationen mit stndigem Sitz in Brssel ist die Menge an abg
Analog zu dem in Punkt 2.1 skizzierten Drei-Stufen-Modell sollten sich die Of
Siehe Bemerkungen zu Yes Poor
No Poor
No Good
No Average
No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion
No Average
Nach den bisherigen Erf No Es ist zu befrchten, da Poor
Yes Good
No opinion Good
No Good
No opinion Good
Yes Average
No Good
No Good
No Good
Yes Average
No As long as (like currentl Good
No Good
No Good
No Good
Yes Average
No Good
No Average
Yes Good
Yes Good
Yes Good
No Good
No opinion No opinion
No Good
No Average
No opinion Good
Yes Average
No opinion Average
No opinion Good
No Average
Yes Good
No opinion Average
No opinion Good
No Good
No opinion Good
No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion
No Good
No Good
No opinion Good
No Good
No opinion Good
No opinion No opinion
Yes Good
Yes Keine Angabe von Fina Good
Yes Average
No Quite the contrary. Pro Average
No Good
No Average
Yes Good
No opinion Good
No Average
No Average
No opinion Average
No Good
No Average
No No opinion
Yes Good
No opinion Average
Yes Good
Yes Average
No Good
No Average
No Good
No Poor
No opinion Good
No opinion Good
No opinion Good
Yes Average
No Good
No Good
No opinion No opinion
Finantial data required isNo opinion Average
No Good
No Good
Yes Just register people whoAverage
No opinion Average
Yes Averagethe data disclosure requirements, especially
There is no rationale to simplify
ultimately leads to less data being disclosed. Rather, as set out above, the da
No requirements need strengthening.
Poor
As explained above, it i Yes See our concrete 30% p Poor
Offenlegungspflichten im Transparenzregister mssen im Hinblick auf den da
Yes Good
Yes Good
Yes Good
No Good
No Good
No Average
No opinion Average
Yes The registrant should be Good
No Good
No Good
No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good
No Average
Yes No opinion
No opinion Good
No Poor
No opinion The data disclosure req No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Comme mentionn prcde
Yes No opinion
Yes Average
No opinion Average
No opinion Good
No Good
No it is extremely easy, the Average
No opinion No opinion
No Good
No opinion No opinion
No opinion Good
possible without compromising essential information.
Transparency
For this, new
International
technological
suggest
solutions
to create
and an
an additional category of lobbyi
In terms of technical solutions Organisations having more than 3 high-level meetings per year with Commis
Yes Poor
quelques difficluts sur No Good ber den Export/ Import von CSV- oder Excel-
Die Mglichkeit, Informationen
Selbst wenn alle erford Yes Statt konkreter Dateneingabe
Average
knnten auch Links zu eigenen Webseiten, auf
No opinion Good
No opinion Good
Yes No opinion
Yes The accurate calculationAverage
See the previous response with respect to the ease of providing financial information.
No opinion for the register may pose some challenges
Preparing non-financial information No opinion
to international law firms for whom lobbying act
In addition, preparing theNo opinion for the register can pose challenges Good
information generally for law firms especially (but not solely) if th
It should be noted that some organisations whoseFirstly,
lobbying
as noted
activityabove,
Offenlegungspflichtenwouldimitrequire
shouldthem
be easier
to register
Transparenzregister for new
often
organisations
mssen take part in(including
im Hinblick consultatio
auf den daa
Finally, to be able to accurately
Yes record lobbying activities,
Secondly,firms
the need
percentage
to invest
Noofopinion
the
in raising
full-time
staff
equivalent
awareness (FTE)
of the
dedicated
time-recording
to lobbya
Unklare Vorgaben wie zur NoBerechnung
opinion von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
Unklare Vorgaben
sind zu Good
wievermeiden.
zur Berechnung
Zur Schtzung
von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
von Mitgliedsbeitrgen
sind zu verme
mss
Instructions related to f No opinion
Unklare Vorgaben wie zur Berechnung von Mitgliedsbeitrgen sind zu vermeiden. Average Mitgliedsbeitrge sollten nur verffentlicht w
Die EU-Institutionen
Zur Strkung sollten
Yeseinund
der Transparenz integriertes Register
Dieber
der VerlsslichkeitEU-Institutionen
der alle
Datenmageblichen
sollten
PoorEU-Strukturen
ein integriertes
im Transparenzregister und
Register
sollten Plattformen
die ber alle
frmageblichen
EU-Institutionendie Europisch
ein integri
Yes Siehe Antwort zu Frage Poor
No Average
No Good
No opinion Poor
Under the current design of the register, it is easyDisclosure
to provide requirements
the information
of required and the administrative
the Transparency burden
Register should is reasona
be proportiona
Transparency
In particular forInternational
internationalsupports all efforts
corporations to Transparency
it takes limit
The administrative
a tremendous
following International
burden on
recommendations
bureaucratic suggests
registrants
effortcouldintroducing
to updateasto
help farease
theirasgradual
possibledata
Transparencywithout
disclosure disclosure
comprom
requirements:
Register requ
entry
In terms of technical solutions
Unclear rules for calculation of membership fees should Such
Unclear a be
system
rules forwould
avoided. In create
calculation
order toa estimate
of sort of light-registration
membership membership
fees should to
fees, the EU Transparen
beorganisations
avoided. In order
have
- Automatic alerts that ask Noregistrants to reconfirm implausible declarationsPoor such as particularly short explanations or registran
EU institutions should establish
Yes Transparency
an integrated register
EU institutions International
covering allshould
relevant suggest
establish
Poor
EU to create
structures
an integrated an additional
and platforms
register of thecategory
covering
European of lobbyi
all relevant
CommEU
-Additional
On the lobbying expenditure
guidelines sh No in particular data accuracy might be improved by asking for the different budget lines (staff, offic
Good
In general, there should be a principle that entries get updated when significa
- Drop-down menus should be introduced where possible, particularly for the legislative files a registrants is active on (synced
A system of gradual data disclosure requirements could be based on the follo
In term of better guidance - Available resources of the organisation (staff, lobby expenses etc.)
En ce qui concerne
- Overhaul les i No opinion
of the guidelines to rule out ambiguities - Activity
using non-technical
levels (meetings Average
language.
with EU officials, number of access badges)
- better guidance on how to calculate Full-Time Equivalents
Maintainingorthe Lobby
current
budgets
logic of
soincentives,
that entriesthose
in theorganisations
register are comparable.
wishing to obt
Yes Poor
Offenlegungspflichten im Transparenzregister mssen im Hinblick auf den da
No opinion Average
No opinion Poor
No opinion Average
No opinion No opinion
As explained
AmCham
EFPIA EU above,
believeswelcomes
that theit issthe
often
Yes very complicated
Transparency and
Register burdensome
Implementing
Please for companies
Guidelines,
see 2.2 above. which provide more clarity on some of the opera
Average
and trade associations to assemble all the data on membership costs,
No Good
especially
1) The staff since a percentage
costs: the currentofguidelines
the organisations
state thatlobby cost ofofthat
all shares staff costs including gross/fees allowances, bonuses and be
I'm
The a student and I don't Yes I think (only supposition Average
2) current
membership data
needs
The methodologydisclosure
to beused may be misleading
investigated
to count year
the when
by year
number calculating
of through
people aggregate
long research
involved lobbying
in lobbying expenses
activities (25%, per
50%, sector
75%,represented
100%) is notbyclear
trade
processes.
3) AmCham ThisEUinformation No opinion
is then often
is not comfortable with subject to various
the definition possible
of representation Goodas currently provided by the guidelines.
costs
For
4) instance, UNESPA
misinterpretations
Consultancies which
and law Yes
is
canmember
create
firm of Insurance
unjustified
annual Europe.
UNESPA
claims
See to
costs related Insurance
belives
concrete
ofactivities:
alleged 30% that
Europes
theAverage
proposal
AmCham EU lobbying
on expenses
membership
believes costs
that this are solely based
above.
information on its natio
is not relevant for
non-compliance. Yes Poor
Moreover, AmCham EU would Yes also welcome more Please
claritysee
on the
2.2 given
above.possibilities
Average of an enforcement mechanism overseeing c
Yes There may be merit in incGood
The documentation is easy No opinion Average
More clarity could be pr Yes No opinion
Some of the questions arYes A definition and the pur Average
For large multinational Yes Some of the information,Average
voir commentaire ci-des Yes No opinion
Yes Good
The data disclosure requirements should be fully compliant with the relevant
No Average
No opinion No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes siehe
Siehe 2.1
oben Poor
Die gewissenhafte ErhebYes (Seitens der EU-Insitutionen
Average
knnte z.B. ein integriertes Register ber Mitglie
Providing comprehensiveYes In light of the above comGood
Providing the informatio Yes See point 4.1. No opinion
Most of the data is easi Yes It is important to keep t No opinion
No The disclosure requiremePoor
As per the comment above Yes A clearer, more streamli No opinion
No opinion Good
No Average
No Good
Insurance Europe agrees that the right type of information is required from registrants to the TR. However, the current data dis
No opinion Good
The estimation of the re Yes A simpler framework for
For instance, Insurance Europes lobbying expenses are solely based on its Average
national members contributions. However, Insura
One issue we encounter No is the provision of numbers of naturalque
S, creemos persons
hay dos
Good
within our membership,
importantes mejoras asqueweseare an umbrella
podran hacer: organis
No would like the TR to offer the possibility for trade
Therefore, Insurance Europe No opinion
associations and their members (as well as thei
El elemento ms complejo Yesy que genera un mayorInsurance
Con
coste Europe
respecto a losbelieve
burocrtico es elAde
gastos verage
dereunir
membresa
toda la en
informacin
las asociaciones,
sobre costes
Repsol
deapues
memb
Once information is submi
No opinion No comment
Die Erhebung der Daten insbesondere zu Mitarbeiterkapazitten und finanziellenNo opinion
Mitteln ist zwar gerechtfertigt, verursacht abe
Tambin es muy difcil llevar
Yes un seguimiento de todos
Con respecto
los actosapblicos
los gastos
oAverage
eventos
asociados
en los
a laque
participacin
hayan participado
en actosmiembros
pblicos ode
e
No opinion Average
Yes Insbesondere die EinbeziAverage
Organisations are adaptiYes There might be possibili Average
Organisations are adaptiYes There might be possibili Average
No Average
Les donnes financires concernant l'valuation cot de la force de travail consacre au activits de lobbying sont les plus dif
Le deuxime point de difficult
Yes concerne les financements
Oui, par exemple,
reus deseninstitutions
laisNo opinion
europennes pour les groupes qui ont de nom
Sometimes it is a bit dif Yes We think it would be bettGood
No Average
AFA agrees that the right type of information is required from registrants to the Transparency Register. However, the current da
Therefore, AFA supports Yes
the possibility for trade associations
AFA supportsand
thetheir
possibi
members
No opinion
(as well as their members members) to be ab
No Average
No opinion Good
Il est
As ncessaire
mentioned, de veil
some No
information Average
required are unclear and difficult to interpret and collect. This leads to misinterpretations whic
Yes Requesting detailed datas Average
Generell sollte
Some of the von unkl Yes
information required such as the FTE calculation is unnecessary Average
complicated and does not allow to have a consis
No More data should be reqPoor
Certain information required for registrations is easy to provide, and the Implementing Guidelines do provide helpful guidance
Generell
We cannotsollte von unkl
disclose Yes data which is not publicly available and therefore
financial Average
agree that the financial data to be provided (i.e.
Generell sollte von unkl Yes s.o. Poor
In addition, as noted above,
Yes the estimation of the Please
full time
see
equivalent
response of
to staff
No opinion
working on activities falling within the scope of th
Yes Average
No Poor
Le recensement des persNo No opinion
No opinion No opinion
The last update of the register introduced a requirement for consultancies to provide information on the costs for carrying out o
No Poor
It is relevant in a transparency context to know that a client is paying a consultancy a certain amount of money for an assignm
No opinion
Hence, we would strongly recommend going back to registering only our revenue, Average both in total and as per client, in order to inc
As of today,Cambre
In addition,
DIGITALEUROPE there iswelcomes
a c Yes
would likethe
to Transparency Additional
report its hesitations
Register guidelines
in guidelines,
some wo Average
caseswhich
when indicating
provide in financial
some clarity onbrackets revenues for
the methodology from clien
entities
Making the distinction between
Yes the two would enable As stated
the register
in the previousGood
to provide better and more accurate data since the budget ra
Furthermore, we believe Yes that the methodology used Please
to declare
see above
the number
our anAverage
of people involved in lobbying activities is not clear
Yes UniCredit esteems that t Average
The FTE calculation couNo Poor
Yes Average
Having to report our membership contributions to professional associations which are themselves registered in the European T
Nopercentage
In addition, estimating the opinion of time spent by internal experts whose Average
main activity is not lobbying can be time consum
No opinion Good
Both of these points are No The are
consistent with the guidelines
We goal to achievelobbying
forcomfortable
declaring a fu Poor
with theexpenses
degree ofdeveloped
flexibility allowed
jointly with
in the
Transparency
current guideli
Int
No Average
No opinion Average
The information requiredNo I consider the procedure Average
No opinion Average
No Average
No opinion No opinion
Disagree Disagree
Disagree No opinion
Fully agree No opinion
Disagree Disagree
No opinion Fully agree
Partially agree Point (h) concerning the No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
No opinion No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree
No opinion No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree Partially agree
Disagree Partially agree
Fully agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree
Disagree Disagree
Fully agree Fully agree
No opinion No opinion
Fully agree Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree
Fully agree No opinion
Partially agree Partially agree
Fully agree Fully agree
No opinion No opinion
Fully agree No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Partially agree No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Fully agree No opinion
No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Partially agree No opinion
Partially agree Fully agree
No opinion No opinion
Partially agree No opinion
Fully agree Fully agree
Disagree No opinion
Partially agree Partially agree
No opinion No opinion
The Code of Conduct should also prohibit the representation by private firms
No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Die Vergleichbarkeit der Daten im Register sollte dringend gestrkt werden. Dazu sind insbesondere unklare Vorgaben wie zu
Fully agree Fully agree
Um Transparenz zu strken, sollten Nichtregierungsorganisationen verpflichtet werden, przise Informationen ber ihre jeweili
Fully agree Partially agree
Disagree Disagree
Fully agree Fully agree
The Code of Conduct covers many important points although some importan
Transparency International has estimated that over half of the entries on the lobby register contain factual errors or implausible
The Code of Conduct should prohibit the representation by private firms (inclu
The human resources and software capacity devoted to the EU lobby register, as well as its investigatory and enforcement po
Partially agree A further concern is that Disagree
the Code of Conduct is too indirectly linked to the sy
Partially agree Fully agree
Fully agree Fully agree
The amount of data that Fully agree We support the set of ru Fully agree
Partially agree Disagree
No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Disagree Disagree
Transparency International hat im vergangenen Jahr 4.253 Einzelbeschwerden wegen Fehleintrgen im Transparenzregister e
Fully agree Fully agree
Daher ist es von ganz grundlegender
Partially agree
Bedeutung,Verste
dass dasgegen
Registersekretariat
den VerhDisagree
personell ausreichend ausgestatt ist, so dass g
No opinion No opinion
Transparency Internationa
Partially agree The Code of Conduct cove
Disagree
Partially agree Partially agree
No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Partially agree Partially agree
Partially agree The Code of Conduct covers many
Partially important points although some importan
agree
Fully agree Fully agree
The Code of Conduct should prohibit the representation by private firms (inclu
No opinion No opinion
Transparency InternationalFully
hasagree
estimated that over
Thehalf
Code
of the
of Conduct Partially
entries onshould
the alsoagree
lobby register
prohibit contain
the representation
factual errors
byorprivate
implausible
firms
Fully agree Fully agree
The Code of Conduct covers many important points although some importan
The human resources and Partially
software
agree
capacity devoted
Breaches
to theofEUthelobby
Coderegister,
of Disagree
Conduct
as well
should
as itsbeinvestigatory
more readilyand
sanctioned;
enforcement
see po
be
differs tremendously per No opinion No opinion
The Code of Conduct should prohibit the representation by private firms (inclu
The data provide
Transparency a basicFully
International hasagree
estimated that over half of the entries on thePartially
lobby agree
register contain factual errors or implausible
Fully agree A further concern is that Partially
the Codeagree
of Conduct is too indirectly linked to the sy
The human resources and Partially
software
agree
capacity devoted to the EU lobby register,
Disagree
as well as its investigatory and enforcement po
Die Verstndlichkeit der Daten im Register sollte dringend verbessert werden, um Fehlinterpretationen und reputationsschdig
Fully agree Fully agree
Die Vergleichbarkeit der Fully
Datenagree Fully
im Register sollte dringend gestrkt werden. agree
Dazu sind insbesondere unklare Vorgaben wie zu
Damit Transparenzvorgaben
FullySinn
agree
machen, mssen sie fr alle Organisationen
Partially
gleichermaen
agree gelten: Nichtregierungsorganisa
Fully agree Fully agree
In particular, the categories "full-time equivalent (FTE)" and "number of persons involved," lead to misunderstandings, if users
The comparability of the data in the register should be strengthened. Unclear requirements as for the calculation of membersh
Fully agree Partially agree
All organisations should Fully agree Much more can and must be done to boost transparency
Fullytowards
agree
The EU institutions should actively promote a culture of compliance and work ensuring that register entries are in acco
A mandatory lobby transparency register should require all EU lobbyists to
Fully agree Partially agree
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting with unregistered
The data from Transparen Partially agree The Code of talks,
Trilogue Conduct inclDisagree
by which 90% of EU law is decided in fast-track mode beh
Fully agree Membership of expert Partially agreegroups of the Commission must have f
and advisory
Open data must be implemented to ensure that EU documents and inform
No opinion Partially agree
No opinion No opinion
Fully agree No opinion
1619 new organisations signed up to the Register. Of these, 353 organisations, or 22% of the new
registrants, report that their lobbyists earn under 10,000 per year. 45 new registrants report
lobbying expenses of over 1 million. Approximately half of the new registrants, 768 organisations,
Partially agree Fully agree
report that their lobbying expenses exceed their total annual turnover.
No opinion No opinion
Fully agree However, the enforcement Fully agree
of the Code should equally be based on a sound s
We have no opinion on whether or not the qualityWe of data
would
is also
high.like
It istogenerally
add that accepted
the solicitor
thatprofession
the qualityinofEngland
data varies
and betwee
Wales i
We must also stress thatFully
we would
agreewelcome moreFurthermore,
resources dedicated
these codes toDisagree
the
setTransparency
out the core values
Register
of secretariat.
the profession, which are
Fully agree
Die Verstndlichkeit der Daten im Register sollte dringend verbessert werden, Fullyum
agree
Fehlinterpretationen und reputationsschdig
No opinion No opinion
Die Vergleichbarkeit der Fully
Datenagree
im Register sollte dringend gestrkt werden. Partially
Dazu sind
agreeinsbesondere unklare Vorgaben wie zu
Die Verstndlichkeit der Fully agree Partially agree
In order to avoid any misinterpretation and reputational damage by misleading media coverage, comprehensibility of data prov
The combination of limited monitoring with the absence of consequences for organisations that provide false, out-dated or inco
Comparability of data in the Register should urgently be improved. Unclear rules for calculation of membership fees should be
i processi di
According toassicurazio Partiallycheck
a basic plausibility agreepublished by
nonTransparency
dovrebbe essere conc
Disagree
International on 7 September 2015, over half the entries for
In order to transparency Fully
requirements
agree providing actual
Alongside
transparency,
the CoC, they
Volksw
Partially
need to agree
apply equally for any registrant. NGOs shou
Since then, 780 of these Noorganisations
opinion have updated their entry or been removed
Partially from
agreethe register. Nevertheless, the situation
Recommendation: What is not adequate at the moment is the enforcement of the Code. Those n
Fully
Set-up a proper monitoring agreefor registrations
system No opinion
Introducing a proper monitoring system is key to ensuring
To increase
thatcompliance
the information
with the
provided
Code is
the
meaningful,
JTRS should
accurate,
make effective
up-to-date
useand
o
Fully agree Disagree
Die Verstndlichkeit der Daten im Register sollte dringend verbessert werden,
Der Verhaltenskodex deckte um Fehlinterpretationen
viele wichtige Punkte ab,und reputationsschdig
obwohl einige wichtige
Fully agree No opinion
Die Vergleichbarkeit
Transparency der Fully
Daten
International agree
im Register
schtzt, dass ber dieLors
sollte Der deder
dringend
Hlfte son enregistreme
gestrkt
Verhaltenskodex
Eintrge im NoDazu
werden.
sollte opinion
sind insbesondere
Transparenzregister
es privaten Firmen unklare
faktische FehlerVorgaben
(Lobbyfirmen, oder wie zu
Anwaltskanzleie
implausible
see above. Partially agree Partially agree
Damit
SowohlTransparenzvorgabenFullySinn
der Personalbestand agree
und machen,
die mssen sie fr die
Softwarekapazitten allefr
Grundstzlich Organisationen
sollte
dasder Partially
Register gleichermaen
agree mitwerden
Verhaltenskodex
aufgewendet gelten:
dem Nichtregierungsorganisa
Sanktionssystem
als auch die Untersuchun
verbunde
Partially agree Disagree
We believe that in order to achieve good quality data across the board, registered parties need to upload and update relevant
Fully agree Partially agree
Die deutschen Rechtsanwlte unterliegen ihrem eigenen strengen Berufsrech
Zu beachten ist auch, dass das Berufsrecht der Rechtsanwlte dem Verhalte
No opinion Disagree
- The Code of Conduct covers many important points although some importa
Fully agree No opinion
- Breaches of the Code of Conduct should be more readily sanctioned.
We are not sure everyone Fully agree For more information, see: No opinion
Without prejudice
Unfortunately, the of refi Partially
current situationagree A more precise
can only be describes approach Partially
c of theagree
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%
as "poor", because insufficient funding of the EU lobby registe
If thequality
The EU institutions
of data inwant
thePartially
to win back
Register agree
the trust
appears of uneven.
to be http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/press/release.faces/en/63655/html.boo
European Citizens,
This it is an
is perhaps Disagree
important
to be part
expected to have
given an efficient
the large number control over the
and varied na
Fully agree Fully agree
Yes Straightforward
Cualquier ciudadano no Y
s es No opinion
Yes Cumbersome
Yes No opinion
Yes Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
No Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
No Die jeweilige BeschwerdStraightforward
Yes Straightforward
Transparency!!
Yes Straightforward
as a civilian it s impossi Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
No opinion Straightforward
No opinion No opinion
Yes Cumbersome
No opinion Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes No opinion
Yes Straightforward
No Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
No Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
No Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Defina-se "erros de fact Yes Satisfactory but can be
No opinion Straightforward
Yes No opinion
Tout dpend de l'usage qYes publiques et sanctionn No opinion
Yes Straightforward
Yes Cumbersome
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
No Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
No No opinion
No opinion Publicarea sa se faca, duStraightforward
Yes Straightforward
It should be meticoulouslYes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
No Il suffit
Es solltedeeiner
leur interdi Cumbersome
Organisation, die mglicherweise aufgrund von Nichtwissen, a
No Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes name and shame wrde Straightforward
d
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
No Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
No not until they are proved Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
No Satisfactory but can be
Yes Cumbersome
The current system is 'p Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Cumbersome
Yes Straightforward
No opinion Satisfactory but can be
Yes Cumbersome
Yes We are taking about tra No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
No Satisfactory but can be
Yes No opinion
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes No opinion
Pas de "vritable" contr Yes Naming and Shaming, crd
No opinion
Yes Cumbersome
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
Yes No opinion
This is the first time I Yes Straightforward
No No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes Satisfactory but can be
No opinion Straightforward
Yes No opinion
Yes But only after an accounStraightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes No opinion
Yes Straightforward
Yes No opinion
No No disclosure should be No opinion
Yes No opinion
No opinion Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes No opinion
No Straightforward
No opinion Cumbersome
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes No opinion
No Straightforward
Yes No opinion
Yes Straightforward
Yes No opinion
No Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
Yes Depends on the severity No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
As doctor of law, I strong believe that first of all is necessary to have some gr
It is easy to complain a Yes If finally some organization
Satisfactory
have to bebutsuspended,
can be that organization need to
Yes Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes No opinion
The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the general maintenance of the register is far from adequate an
Yes No opinion
Yes Straightforward
No way of getting to pri Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
No opinion No opinion
Yes Cumbersome
The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the general maintenance of the register is far from adequate. Th
Yes Straightforward
Currently, the only real sanction available to the lobby register authorities is removal from the register and this can only occur i
Meanwhile, a future legally-binding lobby register should implement a system of fines and criminal prosecutions for serious bre
Yes Yes, this is absolutely c No opinion
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Need to say why but thisStraightforward
Yes Straightforward
No opinion No opinion
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
No opinion Straightforward
Yes No opinion
Yes Cumbersome
Yes Straightforward
Yes No opinion
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes No opinion
Yes Straightforward
Yes No opinion
We have no experience w
Yes Only once the breac hasStraightforward
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
We would like to see a sYes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Feitelijk kan alleen de lobbyist of de parlementarir of EU-bestuurder een melding en/of klacht indienen. Anderen kunnen geen
Benvloeding met onjuiste Yes Straightforward
informatie dient fors bestraft te worden. Bijvoorbeeld door toegang te weigeren tot de EU gebouwen
De procedure is dus ontoereikend.
Yes Er moeten duidelijke sa Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Sofern die Meldungen und
No Cumbersome
Yes Straightforward
No opinion No opinion
Wie bereits unter 2.4. dargestellt wurde, ist das Registersekretariat derzeit personell nicht ausreichend ausgestattet, so dass n
Yes Straightforward
So in Zukunft Termine mitYes
EntscheidungstrgerInnenDie BAK
nur mehr
schliet
nachsich
Eintrag
d Straightforward
in das Register mglich sein sollten (wie in diesem
No Straightforward
No Straightforward
No Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
No Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Cumbersome
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
No Satisfactory but can be
Yes Cumbersome
No Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
How can a false alert b No In Germany someone is Straightforward
no
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
No opinion Cumbersome
Yes Straightforward
No Satisfactory but can be
No Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
No Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes No solamente los nombre
Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Cumbersome
Yes Straightforward
No Nyilvnossgra hozatal Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
No Satisfactory but can be
Yes Cumbersome
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
No Straightforward
The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the general maintenance of the register is inadequate and the C
No Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
No Straightforward
Yes No opinion
Yes Straightforward
Access should be free, oNo We are concerned that teStraightforward
Yes No opinion
No Satisfactory but can be
The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the generalNo
Yes opinion
maintenance of the register is far from adequate an
No Cumbersome
No opinion
Currently, the only real sanction Straightforward
available to the lobby register authorities is removal from the register. This is an important san
The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the general maintenance of the register is far from adequate. Th
Yes Yes, this is absolutely c Satisfactory but can be
Yes
Currently, the only real sanction Satisfactory
available to the lobby register authorities is but the
removal from canregister
be and this can only occur i
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes
Meanwhile, a future legally-binding lobby registerLa pubblicazione
should implementdelle s Straightforward
a system of fines and criminal prosecutions for serious bre
Yes Yes, this is absolutely c Straightforward
No Straightforward
Yes This would create an ince
Satisfactory but can be
No But access to the reasons
Cumbersome
No Cumbersome
No Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the general maintenance of
the register is far from adequate and the Commission should significantly boost the
resources devoted to the register.
Currently, the only real sanction available to the lobby register authorities is removal from
the register. This is an important sanction, but also a blunt one that can only be applied in
limited circumstances. Under the current rules, those who have been shown to post
inaccurate information face no real penalty and can maintain their European Parliament
Yes
access passes or hold meetings Der Ausschluss
with commissioners. einer reif Straightforward
This must change citizens are to
have confidence in the system. Submitting inaccurate and / or misleading Satisfactory
Yes but can be
information must
be specified as an offence and new sanctions should Yes, be
thisintroduced
is absolutely
suchcrucial
as theastemporary
the threat of bad publicity from suspension s
suspension of lobby 'privileges'.
Yes further incentive to keep Satisfactory
registrationsbut
andcan
databeup to date.
In practice, it is import No opinion Cumbersome
No opinion Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
No Cumbersome
No opinion Straightforward
Unregistered lobbyists s Yes No opinion
Yes Yes, this is absolutely c Straightforward
No opinion No opinion
No opinion Satisfactory but can be
No Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
which are higher than the declared turnover. So more than half of the new entries again raise
concerns not much seems to have changed in terms of the underlying systematic issues.
This clearly shows the need for more systematic checks and verification. For this it is key to set-up a
In comparison to the 780 organisations that were dealt with under our complaint, 1,619 organisations had registered in the me
This clearly shows the need No for more systematic checks and verification. For Straightforward
this it is key to set-up a proper monitoring system
Yes
In order to overcome this problem, we suggest setting-upTransparency a proper Straightforward
International
monitoringstrongly
systemsupports
for registrations
making and
public
using
names
technology
of organis
to
More staff would
It is important thatbethe
nee Yesoverseeing the register
body See ouradministering
and answer to questStraightforward
sanctions is independent. The High Authority for Transp
Yes Public naming and shaming Satisfactory
of thosebut organisations
can be that do not play by the ru
No opinion Satisfactory but can be
The present system for dealing with alerts and complaints and the general maintenance of the register is far from adequate an
Currently, the only real sanction available to the lobby register authorities is removal from the register. This is an important san
Under the current rules, those Yes who have been shown to post inaccurate information Straightforward
face no real penalty and can maintain thei
Die EU-Institutionen sol No Dem vorbergehenden Auss Straightforward
Il
We y a un manque d'inform
theYes Il serait intressant d' ourStraightforward
Die would like to see
EU-Institutionen dueaktiv
sollten process
eine strengthened.
Compliance-Kultur
Dem Asvorbergehenden
consultancies, members
frdern. Es ist darauf
Ausschluss are
hinzuwirken, verydass
knnte dependent
ein on their
menschlicher reputation
Fehler zugrundein
Ideally, the JTRS would have
Yes the capacity to review
The
Registereintrge im Einklang mit den Transparenzleitlinien data
answer
before
harte Strafe, is
stehen,given
it was with
published.
Satisfactory
da infolgedessen but
d.h. die bereitgestellten can be
effektive Interessenvertretung
Informationen gegenber den
Die
nachEU-Institutionen
bestem Wissensol No
vollstndig, aktuell und nichtDem
mehr vorbergehenden
irrefhrend
mglichsind.
ist. Die Aus
Straightforward
DasVerffentlichung
gegenwrtige Ungleichgewicht
eines vorbergehenden Ausschlusses
mindert die Vergleichbarkeit, No opinion
schadet dem politischen
reputationsschdigende
Ziel der Transparenz Cumbersome
Wirkung
und fhrtund zuwre
einemimeinseitigen
Falle eines vorbergehenden A
Blaming derer, die sich No den Leitlinien entsprechend
verhltnismig.
verhalten. Straightforward
Yes Une publication des sancStraightforward
No Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Improvements need
Keine Erfahrung to be
mit dem Nomade in both the procedure itself as well as in Aus
Dem vorbergehenden providing the JTRS with more resources to complete
Straightforward
The current monitoring capacity
No of the Joint Transparency Register Secretariat is not sufficient
Satisfactory but can beto check even a small portion o
Having submitted 4,254 complaints in September 2015 we have gathered extensive experience with the complaints mechanis
The
In present system
comparison to thefor
780 Yes
dealing with alerts
organisations thatand complaints
were dealt withand the our
under general No opinion
maintenance
complaint, of the registerhad
1,619 organisations is far from adequate
registered an
in the me
This clearly shows the need for more systematic checks Transparency
and verification.
International
For strongly
this it is supports
key to set-up
making
a proper
publicmonitoring
names of organis
system
Currently,
In order tothe only realthis
overcome sanction
Yes available
problem, to thesetting-up
we suggest lobby
Yes, this
register
aisproper
absolutely
authorities
c is
Noremoval
monitoring opinion
systemfrom the register. This
for registrations is an important
and using technology san
to
It is important that the bodyYesoverseeing the registerPublic
and naming
administering
and shaming
sanctions
Satisfactory
ofisthose
independent.
but
organisations
can beThe High
that Authority
do not playforby
Transp
the ru
No opinion No opinion
Yes Straightforward
Yes Straightforward
The current monitoring capacity of the Joint Transparency Register Secretariat is not sufficient to check even a small portion o
EU Institutions should actively foster a culture of compliance. It should be ensured that all entries in the Register are complian
Yes
Having submitted 4,254 complaints in September 2015 we have gatheredNo opinion experience with the complaints mechanis
extensive
The Joint Transparency Register
Yes Secretariat staffing
Enforcement
should therefore
of rulesbe
sho
increased.
Straightforward
This would help to deploy effective enforce
In comparison to the 780Yes
organisations that were dealt with under our complaint, 1,619but
Satisfactory organisations
can be had registered in the me
This clearly shows the need for more systematic checks and verification. For this it is key to set-up a proper monitoring system
Yes Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
No opinion Satisfactory but can be
IEFPIA would
think the be supportiYes
procedure is fine. There's just one thing I don't understand and Straightforward
it is about the measures available in the event of non
I don't understand why, inYes Type of non-compliance number 2 (Non-cooperation Straightforward
with JTRS) the measure says: "Removal from
And in the number 3 case: Yes"Inappropriate behavior",
Whyit'snot?
exactly
Thatthe
would
same,
be Straightforward
I think this type of non-compliance is referring to ent
Yes Straightforward
In practice, it is important to distinguish between malicious or unjustified Satisfactory but can be
Yes UNESPA bilieves that ent
claims on the one hand, No andopinion
serious breaches of the code of conduct. Cumbersome
AmCham EU believes that Yest No suspension should beStraightforward
EFAMA does not have anYes Names of suspended orga Straightforward
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Suspensions should occur Straightforward
No No opinion
The EU institutions shouNo A human error could be tStraightforward
No opinion Satisfactory but can be
No Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
The procedure for dealinYes Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
No We are concerned that te
Satisfactory
Registration to the TR requires butinformation
detailed can be that may prove difficult to
No opinion Straightforward
Yes We think itInsurance
However, should beEurope
maStraightforward
believes that entities registered in the TR should
Yes Satisfactory but can be
We are concerned that thYes Satisfactory but can be
Entendemos que este pro No Creemos que no deberaStraightforward
Yes Straightforward
No Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
Yes Yes, BUT only when backg Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
The procedure is adequaYes Yes, the names of suspende
Satisfactory but can be
Yes Straightforward
En vertu de laccord interinstitutionnel, les violations du code de conduite font la fois lobjet dune enqute et de sanctions de
Yes Straightforward
De plus, lautorit de mise
Yes
en uvre doit disposerLe deprincipe
ressources
devrait
suffisantes
tre Satisfactory
pour sassurer
but can
duberespect du cadre rglementaire
It is fundamental to pres No opinion Satisfactory but can be
Grundstzlich
The Commission ist darauf
has notNo Straightforward
allocated sufficient resources to deal with complaints, nor to check efficiently at least part of the entri
Yes This would be an importaSatisfactory but can be
Grundstzlich ist darauf No Straightforward
No opinion Straightforward
Yes We agree that details shSatisfactory but can be
Yes Satisfactory but can be
Satisfactory but can be Je crains qu'on ne peut pNo opinion Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be updating: make it every Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be Any registration and up Very important Very important
We suspect that a good proportion of the errors in the data posted on the lobby register are accidenta
Satisfactory but can be Die Anforderungen bei dVery important Very important
Satisfactory but can be Sometimes, we can not cVery important Very important
Satisfactory but can be the email sent for the a Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important
Commissioners, the register of expert groups, the online database on EC grants, the database of
submissions to EC consultations and the list of EC staff and Commissioners having gone through
the revolving door. Linking this information automatically to the entries on the register largely
Satisfactory but can be Die Bundesarbeitsgemeins Very important Very important
improves the available information while not increasing the administrative burden of filling out
the registration.
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward There should be drop-down menus wherever
Very important possible (e.g. for
Somewhat EU initiatives worked on linked from
important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward EULex or the legislative observatory)
Not important Not important
Satisfactory but can be The Transparency Registe Very important Somewhat important
Automatic
Both in thealerts should
process be introduced
of registration and for the online
updating, the form of the Transparency Register. These
Straightforward Very important Veryintroduction
important of additional smart online measures
Der GDV nimmt die anlassbezogene Aktualisierung seiner Daten regelmig vor. Jedoch kann auch h
Satisfactory but can be improved
alerts Somewhat important No opinion
There should
should automatically
be drop-downflag
menuspotential mistakes
wherever and
possible misreporting.
(e.g. It shouldworked
for EU initiatives be impossible to from EU
on linked
Zudem
Automatic alerts should be introduced for the online form of the Transparency Register. These alertsffs
hat der GDV eine konkrete praktische Unzulnglichkeit festgestellt: Das Update der letzten
Straightforward report - under activitiesVery
and files worked on andNot
important an alarm should indicate when organisations
important
Satisfactory but can be These
Der GDV hat in dieser
changes shouldRubrik
Veryreduce
also important
angemerkt, dass for
the burden sich
Very
derimportant
the GDVtomit
JTRS einem
check onCompliance-Leitfaden
the declarations. bereits
Satisfactory but can be declare lobbying budgetsVery that important
would mean that their lobbyistsimportant
Somewhat receive less than a minimum
Straightforward Very important Very important
wage or make other obvious mistakes by declaring budgets far outside a reasonable range, for
No opinion Very important Very important
No opinion example. Very important Very important
No opinion No opinion No opinion
Satisfactory but can be These changes should also Veryreduce
important
the burden forSomewhat
the JTRS important
to check on the declarations.
Both in the process of registration and updating, the introduction of additional smart online measures
Satisfactory but can be It would be good that whVery important Very important
Straightforward Both in the process of registration and updating, the
Very important Veryintroduction
important of additional smart online measures
There should be drop-down menus wherever possible (e.g. for EU initiatives worked on linked from EU
Straightforward Very
Automatic alerts should be importantfor the online
introduced Very important
form of the Transparency Register. These alerts s
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Somewhat important
Straightforward Veryreduce
These changes should also important
the burden forVery
the important
JTRS to check on the declarations.
Satisfactory but can be Very important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Both in the process of registration and updating, the introduction of additional smart online measures
Satisfactory but can be The process
There shouldcould be mor
Verymenus
be drop-down important Somewhat
wherever possible important
(e.g. for EU initiatives worked on linked from EU
Automatic alerts should be introduced for the online form of the Transparency Register. These alerts s
No opinion Very important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be These changes should also
Veryreduce
important
the burden forSomewhat
the JTRS important
to check on the declarations.
Straightforward Very important Very important
No opinion Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
There should be drop-down menus wherever possible (e.g. for EU initiatives worked on linked from EU
Automatic alerts should be introduced for the online form of the Transparency Register. These alerts s
Straightforward Very important Very important
These changes should also reduce the burden for the JTRS to check on the declarations.
Satisfactory but can be Very important Somewhat important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Straightforward Very important Verygegebenen
Wir vermuten, dass ein groer Teil der Fehler in den important Angaben im Lobbyregister versehent
Straightforward Unklare Vorgaben wie zurVery important Very important
Satisfactory but can be Very important Somewhat important
Satisfactory but can be Le registre doit pouvoir Very important Very important
Straightforward Verytoimportant
As suggested under B. 2.2, Not important
facilitate the disclosure of participation in EU structures and platforms,
Satisfactory but can be This suggestion is also valid
Verywith
important
regard to other data
Very already
importantin posession of the EU authorities (cf. fu
No opinion Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be improved Somewhat important Very important
Straightforward Very important Very important
Satisfactory but can be The Register should be aVery important Somewhat important
Straightforward WWF EPO has been a regi Very important Very important
These incentives would have far more effect if the power to suspend organisa
Not important Very important Overall, such incentives do
Yesnot replace the need for a legally-binding register
Somewhat important Somewhat important Yes
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important Yes be implemented for the access to the Commis
Same level of flexibility should
Very important Very important Indeed, even when reigstered,
Yes we are asked to fill documents to access to m
We support
In the interimthese practical
period before incentives but they
a legally-binding should
lobby not replace
register comes the
intofact tha
force,
Somewhat important Very important Overall, such incentives do
Yes not replace the need for a legally-binding
The Commission's policy that only senior elite in the Commission meet with register
Very important Very important Such policies only boost Nothe number of registrations; they do nothing to imp
These incentives would have far more effect if the power to suspend organi
Very important Very important Overall, such incentivesYesdo not replace the need for a legally-binding registe
No opinion Very important Yes
Very important Very important No caso da Comisso dev Yes
The current situation at the European Parliament in terms of activating the lob
Somewhat important Very important Yes
Very important Somewhat important Yes
Very important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important Yes
Very important Very important No opinion
Somewhat important Very important No opinion
Very important Very important Yes
Somewhat important Very important Noimportant to incentivize entities to register and abid
We consider that it is very
Not important Very important The efficiency of those No
Not important Very important One observation regarding Yesannouncements and notifications of up-coming co
Very important Very important No
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes Any other EU agencies esp
No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
No opinion It is better
sieh oben Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
No opinion It is better
Yes It is better
Yes Every EU member state No
wi opinion
No It is worse
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
l'enregistrement doit t Yes It is better
Yes It is better
No No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Yes It is better
No It is better
Yes It is better
No No opinion
Todos deben estar supe Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Smaller groups seem to No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
No It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
bien entendu: l'influenceYes mais aussi bien sur le P No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Die Reaktionszeiten si Yes It is worse
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
accs aux fonctionnairesNo opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
No It is better
No opinion It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Yes No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion
Yes No opinion
Il s'agit d'viter de cre Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor
Yes No opinion
L'accs aux dputs et aYes It is neither better, nor worse
No The Council is only repreNo opinion
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
No opinion No opinion
everything should be off Y
l es It would be advisable to It is better
Toute interaction pouvanYes It is better
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
Yes It is worse
Yes It is better
Yes It is worse
Yes It is better
No opinion It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
No It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
No It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is worse
honestly why is none of tYes It is neither better, nor
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
No It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
No opinion It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Since low income populati
No The Council has, like th No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
European Commission:
Any lobby meeting with any
YesCommission official No opinion
Any participation in expert groups, advisory groups, market access groups
Any attendance by Commission staff and commissioners at meetings and
other events organised by lobbyists
However, it is important to
Yes
remember that even if all of these incentives are
Noimplemented,
opinion they will still only lead to a de facto m
In addition to the acces Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes And everything else COREPIt is neither better, nor
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
We consider that, in the interim period before a legally-binding lobby register comes into force, the following interactions shoul
European Parliament:
No opinion No opinion
All meetings by MEPs, their staff and Parliament with lobbyists
All events in the Parliament's premises organised by lobbyists
Any participation by MEPs, Yestheir staff and Parliament staff at events and activities
No opinionorganised by lobbyists
Any participation in official Parliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party groups which organise events inside the Parliame
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
European Council, the Council, and member states
Any lobby meeting held by NoPresident Donald Tusk, members of his Cabinet, Noand staff from the secretariat
opinion
Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat of the Council
Invitation to EU Forums rYes It is better
Any lobby meeting held by the Permanent Representations on EU decision-making matters
Any lobby meeting held by staff from the European External Action Services, high-level representative Federica Mogherini and
The European Council and Council are significant EU institutions and importa
However, it is important to remember that even if all of these incentives are implemented, they will still only lead to a de facto m
Yes However, if there is no likelihood
No opinion that these bodies will join the register, the C
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
We are of the view that the current mandatory registration system already covers the most important interactions between EU
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Um den Zugang zu Abgeor
No Der Europische Rat best
NoEurope
Parliamentary events should remain accessible to the public at large. Invest opinionhas had the opportunity in the past to brin
MEPs will often hold meetings in their constituencies with organisations that are not registered at European level and they sho
Yes We agree that the CounciNo opinion
all Commission and EP an
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is worse
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes fcuk yea It is neither better, nor worse
Um einen niederschwelliNo Der Europische Rat best
No opinion
Toute interaction doit tr Yes Parmi les pires cas de l It is neither better, nor
Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Yes No opinion
Ungeachtet dessen, dass die Eintragung in das Transparenzregister verpflichtend sein sollte, sollte eine Eintragung auch Bed
Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is worse
E.g. the EAPN annual EuYes It is neither better, nor worse
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
The current balance of inYes The Council is the least It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Typically interest Grou Yes It is better
in a democracy all voter Yes No opinion
No opinion I don't know It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is worse
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
No It is better
No It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
It should depend on the lNo It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion
Access to MEPs and parliYes It is better
contactos con eurodiputaYes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
No opinion No opinion
No opinion It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
European Commission:
1) Any lobby meeting with any Commission official
Yes It is better
2) Any participation in expert groups, advisory groups, market access groups
3) Any attendance by Commission staff and commissioners at meetings and other events organised by lobbyists
Yes It is better
European Parliament: Yes No opinion
1) All meetings by MEPs, their staff and Parliament with lobbyists
Yes
2) All events in the Parliament's premises organised by lobbyists No opinion
3) Any participation by MEPs,
Yes their staff and Parliament staff at events andIt activities
is better organised by lobbyists
4) Any participation in official Parliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party groups which organise events inside the Parliam
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
All entities involved in Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Yes No opinion
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Any participation by MEPs, their staff and Parliament staff at events and activities
organised by lobbyists
Any participation in official Parliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party groups
which organise events inside the Parliament
European Council, the Council, and member states
Any lobby meeting held by President Donald Tusk, members of his Cabinet, and
staff from the secretariat
Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat TheofEuropean
the Council
Council and Council are significant EU institutions and importa
Any lobby meeting held by the permanent representations also occurs ontowards
EU decision-making
the member states' permanent representations in Brusse
matters lobby register should be fully extended to include the European Council, the C
Any lobby meeting held by staff from the European permanent
External
representations.
Action Services, highlevel
Yes
representative Federica Mogherini and her Cabinet No opinion
However, if there is no likelihood that these bodies will join the register, the C
Yes
However, it is important to remember that even if and all ofParliament
these incentives It implemented,
shouldare is better
proceed to revise the present register and set-up lega
they will still only leadistonot
BUSINESSEUROPE a de
in facto
favourmandatory
of a legallyregister.
system.
binding There
Recalcitrance
remains
register. The aexample
on
pressing
the part
ofneed
of the
some forother institutions
member states with should nottrack
a good prevent
reco
a legally-binding register.Yes new register. No opinion
We would especially seeNo major
opinion
problems if the register were to be made conditional
It is neitheronbetter,
commissioners
nor or senior commission o
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
Bis zur Einfhrung einesYes It is neither
verbindlichen Lobbyregisters sollten folgende Aspekte better, noreiner
Voraussetzung worseRegistrierung werden:
Kommission:
-This Alle Lobbymeetings
increases werden erfasst
burocrac Yes No opinion
- Alle Teilnehmer an Expertentreffen etc. werden genannt
EP:
- Alle Lobbytreffen mit MEPs und Mitarbeitern werden erfasst
- Alle Events im EP, auch von offiziellen Gruppen wie Intergroups und inoffiziellen interfraktionellen Gruppen, etc. werden e
Rat und MS: Yes No opinion
The
- subject
Alle Lobbytreffen vom Prsidenten, Mitgliedern seines Kabinetts, undNo
of the lobby Yes opinion
Sekretariats-Mitarbeitern werden erfasst
- Alle Treffen vom Generalsekretariat des Rats werden erfasst
Yes Der Rat ist eine wesent No opinion
Any meetings that are intYes The Council of the EU beiNo opinion
Following the definition gYes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes Mais avec quelles excepIt is better
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
In general, because of its constrictive character, a mandatory system - even more so than a voluntary one - is viable only if it re
Yes No opinion
Over-regulation is not advisable. The EU framework should be kept light and avoid creating additional administrative burdens.
Yes There should be a level pl
No opinion
We have a certain degree Yes
of understanding for the
While
argument
the technical
that an diff
exaggeratedly
No opinionextensive and detailed record of meetings
Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
No opinion No opinion
Unregistered lobbyists should not be able to organise
To allow events
the public
at the
to monitor
Europeanthat
Parliament
the aboveorprinciples are respected, the Co
the Commission. meetings with lobbyists in a similar fashion to the European Commission. The
Transparency International is convinced that a mandatory register that is legally binding for lobbyists and can be enforced by t
To allow the public to monitor that the above principles publish areallrespected,
written input thebyinstitutions
lobbyists inshould
a central location to allow the establish
In preparation of a mandatory lobby register a new IIA can bring about further transparency and with sufficient political will it co
publish meetings with lobbyists. Current transparency Legislative
provisionsFootprint.
that apply to Commissioners,
To make this approach work, Yes the Commission, Parliament and Council
Ein Eintrag im Transpar should be guided by the aim to make it as difficult as po
It is better
Cabinets and Directors-General should be extended Lobbying
to include
transparency
all officialsisthat
onlyhaveas strong
significant
as its weakest element, since there i
Unregistered lobbyists should not have access to Parliament/Commission premises. Visitors that are not on the register should
influence on the decision-making process, down to activities
Head ofand Unit
undue
level.influence
When publishing
tend to concentrate
the on the least transparent pa
Unregistered lobbyists Yes not be able to get meetings. This should beItthe
should is neither
case better,
for all nor worse
officials. Among the be
MEPs thisconditio
shoul
In the interim period before a legally-binding lobby register comes into force, the following interactions should made
subject of meetings, information
Yes should include reference
making process.
to the concrete
In orderlegislative
Ittoishave
bettera procedure
robust system of lobby transparency, it is
C'est la cas
Unregistered
European
The current actuelleme
Commission:
Transparency Yes
lobbyists should not advise
Register the Parliament
is already somewhat as quasi-mandatory It as
part of intergroups, is better
parliamentary
the Register works hearings or in any other
on a voluntary basis advisory
and inc
if applicable
Any lobbyand not simply
meeting Yesrepeat
with the portfolioofficial
any Commission oftothe
ensure
official.transparency
For the Europeanthroughout
It iswillParliament
better the entire decision-making process. The C
Therefore, the current quasi-mandatory register means that interest groups sign up as this is the only way to access high-
Unregistered
We therefore lobbyists
Any participation
suggest in should
theexpert
No not advise
groups,
Commission
opinion the Commission
advisory
to keep Transparency
groups,
the broadmarketas partInternational
definition ofofhigh-level
access Nostrongly
groups
mandatory groups,
in aadvocates
opinion consultative
possibly for committees,
a register
revised thatexpert
approach. covers groups
all EU
president,
vice-presidents,
Any attendance group presidents, committee
by Commission European chairsUnion
andinrapporteurs
its roleand as co-legislator,
publishing theiralongside the European Parliamen
No opinion staff and commissioners at meetingsNo opinion
Unregistered
other lobbyists should
events organised by not be able to organise
lobbyists Council
eventsshouldat the
joinEuropean
the Inter-Institutional
Parliament or Agreement
the Commission.
and become a full memb
Yes
meetings should be mandatory. Other MEPs should all EU
publish
legislation.
their meetings No
Decisions, onopinion
which
a voluntary
affectbasis.
the daily life of 500 million of EU cit
To allow
European the publiclobbyists
Parliament:
Unregistered to monitor that the
should notabove principles
have access To to allow
aretherespected,
public tothe
Commission/Parliament monitor
institutions
that the
premisesshould
abovepublish principles
meetings
are respected,
with lobbyists.
the CoC
The
Parliament
All meetingsand by the
MEPs, Commission
Yesshould
their staff should publish three allwith
institutions,
written inputthe by Council
lobbyists remains
No opinion in a central
the blind-spot when it comes to lobbyin
Unregistered lobbyists notand Parliament
be able to get meetings lobbyists
with Commission officials/MEPs
Organisations events with bad No should
opinion
entries should
not be
be temporarily
to Lobbying suspended
transparency No opinion
The All
location
Unregistered
pretension
to
in the
allow that
Parliament's
lobbyists
the EU institutions
the establishment
premises
ancan
of staff
EU
organised
able
impose organise
The
Legislative
TI
by lobbyists
events
restrictions
pretension
research
Footprint. ofand
on
that
their
repeatedly
no
the
the is
longer
only
premises
interactions
EU get
as of
strong
access
thethe
institutions
confirmed. with
TIs
asto
can
recent EUits
the
Commission/ weakest
impose Commission,
institutions
report
element,
Parliament
restrictions
on EU
Lobbying
Parliament
since
their there
inofmatters
Europe:
andi
intera
that
Hid
We consider Any participation
Unregistered by Yes
MEPs, their and Parliament staff at events It
and is neither
activities better,
organised nor worse
by lobbyists
that, lobbyists should
in the interim not before
period be ableatolegally-binding
We
advise agree thewith
Commission/Parliament
the Commissions
lobby register comesview intothat
force,thethe Council
followingof the EU shouldshoul
interactions inde
European Anyinstitutions
Public participation in official
Yes Parliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party
It EU, groups
is privileges
neither which
better, nororganise events inside orthe Parli
Organisations
Transparency Internationalwith be
Commission: badthat EU, national,
entries
is should beregional
convinced temporarily
that a
and
Public
mandatory
local
Privileged institutions
should
suspendedAccess
register
notbe
and impose
shows
that no that
is longer
that
legally
national,
get
the accessand
Council
binding
regional
for toregistration
the and
scoring
lobbyists
local
meagre
and
obligations,
can
should not
19be%enforced even
impose
compared ex
bywt
Any lobby meeting withYes any Commission officialThe CCBE is in favour ofNo opinion
European
Commission, Council, in
Any participation the Council,
No
expert and member states Itthe
isgroups
neither better, nor
In
As preparation
Any lobby Parliament
of a mandatory
meeting andgroups,
held byCouncil.
lobby
advisory
They
register
President
groups,
should
a new
Donald bemarket
Commission
IIA excluded
can bring
access
at from
53of%
about
groups
expert
and
further Europeanand
transparency business
Parliament
andthe with 37 %political
withsecretariat
sufficient is a particular
will it co b
ItTusk,
wouldmembers
Any attendance by Commission staff and commissioners at meetings his Cabinet,
and other and
eventsstaff from
organised by lobbyists European Par
with the forthcoming Yes make sense for It is better
All meetings
Any lobbyby meeting
MEPs, held by the
their offences general
staff and should secretariat
Parliament of the Council
delegations.
To
Allmake this Grave
Any lobby approach
meetingor repeat
Yes
work,
held bythetheCommission,
permanent be it with
sanction
comes
Parliament
representations
lobbyists
to
and lobbying
Counciltransparency.It is neither
should be guided better,
by the nor aim to make it as difficult as po
events in the Parliament's premises organised by lobbyistson EU decision-making matters
AnyFederation
The Any lobby meeting
participation held by
of Enterprises
by MEPs, instaff
their from
Belgium
staff andisthenotEuropean
inThe
Parliament European
favour External
of a
staff Council
atlegallyAction
events binding
and Services,
and Council high-level
register.
activities are
Thesignificant
organised representative
example EU
of
by lobbyists institutions
some Federica
member and
Mogherin
importa
states wit
Unregistered lobbyists should not have access to Parliament/Commission premises. Visitors that are not on the register sho
Any participation in official Parliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party groups which organise events inside the Parliam
Unregistered lobbyists should not be able toTusk,
get
if Transparency
allmeetings. This
International
should be isstrongly
the
andcase
However,
We would itespecially
is important seetoYesremember
major that
problems ifeven
the However,
register of these
wereif to
there
incentives
be is Cabinet,
madeno are likelihood
It implemented,
neither
conditional thatadvocates
for
better,
on theseall
theyofficials.
nor
bodies
commissioners forstill
will awill
Among
register
only
join
or the
leadthat
the
senior MEPs
covers
a de this
register,
tocommission allsho
facto
the EU
Cm
o
Any lobby meeting held by President Donald members of his staff from the secretariat
Unregistered lobbyists should
No opinion not advise the Parliament as part of intergroups,
It is parliamentary
neither better, nor hearings or in any other advis
Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat The ofEuropean
the Council Council and Council are significant EU institutions and importa
Unregistered lobbyists
held should not advise the Commission
Council should
as
onpart
join ofthe high-level
Inter-Institutional
groups, consultative
Agreement and committees,
become a expert
full memb
grou
Any lobby meeting by the Permanent Representations
http://alter-eu.org/documents/2016/03-0
EU decision-making matters
Unregistered lobbyists should not be able to organise events at the European Parliament or the Commission.
Any lobby meeting heldYes by staff from the European However,
External if there
Action is Services,
no likelihood
No opinion
high-level
that these representative
bodies will join Federica
the register,
Mogherini the an
C
To allow the public to monitor that the above principles are respected, the Co
Yes It is neither
To allow the public to monitor that the above principles are respected, the institutions should publish meetings with lobbyists. C better, nor worse
Yes Lobbying transparency isItonly is neither better,
as strong as norits weakest element, since there i
No opinion No opinion
In the interim period before a legally-binding lobby register comes into force, the following interactions should be made conditio
European Commission:
To
Anymake
lobbythis approach
meeting with work, the Commission,
any Commission officialParliament and Council should be guided by the aim to make it as difficult as po
Any participation in expert groups, advisory groups, market access groups
Unregistered
Any attendance by lobbyists shouldstaff
Commission not and
havecommissioners
access to Parliament/Commission
at meetings and premises. Visitors that are not on the register sh
Unregistered lobbyists should
other events organised by lobbyists not be able to get meetings. This should be the case for all officials. Among the MEPs this sh
Unregistered
European Parliament:lobbyists should not advise the Parliament
Transparency as part
International
of intergroups,
strongly
parliamentary
advocates for hearings
a register
or in
that
anycovers
other all
advis
EU
Unregistered
SEAP
All believes
meetings lobbyists
by that
MEPs,anytheirshould not advise the
rYes staff and Parliament with Commission
The absence as part of
lobbyists of Council w high-level
It is bettergroups, consultative committees, expert gro
Unregistered lobbyists should
All events in the Parliament's not beorganised
premises able to organise
Council should
events join
by lobbyists at the
theEuropean
Inter-Institutional
Parliament
Agreement
or the Commission.
and become a full memb
Any participation by MEPs, Yestheir staff and Parliament staff at events and activities organised by lobbyists
Itinstitutions
is better
To
Anyallow the publicinto
participation monitor
official that the above
Parliament principles
intergroups To
andallow
arethe
respected,
public
unofficial tothe
monitor
cross-party that the
groups should
abovepublish
principles
meetings
are respected,
with lobbyists.
the CoC
Yes It is betterwhich organise events inside the Parliame
European Council, the Council, and member states
See our answers
Organisations withtobad
quesYes should be temporarily No opinion
Any lobby meeting held entries
by President Donald Tusk, Lobbying
suspended
members transparency
and
of his no is
longer
Cabinet, only
andget
as strong
access
staff fromastoits
the theweakest
Commission,
secretariat element,Parliament
since there
andi
Yes
Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat of the Council It is neither better, nor
Any lobby meeting held by Yesthe permanent representations on EU decision-making No opinion matters
Any lobby meeting held by staff from the European TheExternal
EU lobbyAction
register
Services,
should high-level
be fully extended
representative
to include
Federica
the European
MogheriniCoun
and
However, it is important to Yesremember that even if However,
all of theserecalcitrance
incentives are on
Noimplemented,
theopinion
part of thethey
otherwillinstitutions
still only lead
should
to anot
deprevent
facto m
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
In principle, we think no access should be given to any official for lobbyingNo
Yes opinionwithout being registered. There are surely
purpose
We also realize that this Yes is a rule easier to enforceThe to staff
Council
members
is a keythan
parto
It is
elected
betterpoliticians.
In the interim period before a legally-binding lobby register comes into force, the following interactions should be made conditio
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
European Commission: No opinion It is neither better, nor
No opinion
Any lobby meeting with any Commission official It is neither better, nor worse
No opinion
Any participation in expert groups, advisory groups, market access groups It is better
Any attendance by Commission staff and commissioners at meetings and
other events organised
Representatives of organbyYeslobbyists No opinion
European Parliament:
Transparency International is convinced that a mandatory register that is legally binding for lobbyists and can be enforced by t
All meetings by MEPs, their staff and Parliament with lobbyists
In preparation
All events of
in athe Yes
Parliament's premises It is better
mandatory lobby register organised by lobbyists
a new IIA can bring about further transparency and with sufficient political will it co
Yes
Any participation by MEPs, their staff and Parliament staff at events and No opinion
activities organised by lobbyists
make
To Any participation
this approachinwork,
official
theParliament
Commission,intergroups andand
Parliament unofficial
Councilcross-party
should begroups
guidedwhich
by theorganise events
aim to make inside
it as the as
difficult Parli
po
European Council,
Unregistered the Council,
lobbyists should
No and
not member
opinion states
have access to Parliament/Commission No premises.
opinion Visitors that are not on the register sho
Unregistered
Any lobby meeting
lobbyistsheld by President
should
Yes not be ableDonald
to getTusk, members
meetings. This of his Cabinet,
should be
It isthe and staff
case
better from
for all the secretariat
officials. Among the MEPs this sho
Unregistered
Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat
lobbyists should not advise the Parliament of the
Transparency Council
as part
International
of intergroups,
strongly
parliamentary
advocates hearings
for a register
or inthat
anycovers
other advis
all EU
Any lobby meeting
Unregistered lobbyistsheld by the
should notpermanent
advise the representations
Commission as on partEUof decision-making
high-level groups, matters
consultative committees, expert grou
Any lobby meeting
Unregistered lobbyistsheld by staff
should from
not be thetoEuropean
able The European
organise
Council External
events
shouldat Council
Action
join
thethe Services,
and
European Council
high-level
are significant
Inter-Institutional
Parliament representative
Agreement
or EU institutions
the Commission.
and Federica
become andMogherin
importa
a full memb
esoecially access to officYes It is better
However, it ispublic
To allow the important to remember
to monitor that the that even
above if However,
all allow
principles
To of these if there
arethe incentives
publicisto
respected, no are
likelihood
the implemented,
monitor thatthat
institutionsthe these
shouldthey
above bodies
will still
publish will
principles only
join
arelead
meetings the register,
to alobbyists.
respected,
with de the
facto
theCoCC
m
Yes No opinion
Organisations with bad entries
Yes should be temporarily Lobbying
suspended
transparency
and no is longer
Itonly
is neither
get
as strong
access
better,
astonor
its
theweakest
Commission,
element,Parliament
since thereandi
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Yes Le Conseil de l'UE est aussi It is better
important que le Parlement europen en terme l
Transparency International
L'accs aux fonctionnair Yesis convinced that a mandatory register
Etendre le that
registre auisConseil
legally bindingtoutefois
No opinion
crera for lobbyists and can be
des difficults enforcedcar
pratiques, bylet
In preparation of a mandatory lobby register a new IIA can bring about further transparency and with sufficient political will it co
To make this approach work, the Commission, Parliament and Council should be guided by the aim to make it as difficult as po
As stated above, clear rules and their actual enforcement are key. The Joint T
Yes
- Unregistered lobbyists should not have access to Parliament/Commission Nopremises.
opinion Visitors that are not on the register shou
- Unregistered lobbyists should not be able to getVolkswagen
No opinion meetings. This should be
furthermore theneither
caseestablishing
Itsuggests
is for all officials.
better, nor worse Among the
an advisory MEPs
body thisSecre
to the sho
- Unregistered lobbyists should
Yes not advise the Parliament
Transparency
as part
International
of intergroups,
Nostrongly
parliamentary
opinion advocateshearings
for a register
or in any
that other
coversadviso
all EU
- Unregistered lobbyists should not advise the Commission as part of high-level groups, consultative committees, expert group
- Unregistered lobbyists should not be able to organise
Council
events
shouldatjoin
the the
European
Inter-Institutional
ParliamentAgreement
or the Commission.
and become a full memb
Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
Yes No opinion
No opinion It is better
SMEs may not be register Yes No opinion
Yes Fr alle am europische No opinion
Certainement. Le Registre
Mandatory registration inYes It isfor
the Transparency Register should also be required neither better, nor
organisations worse
and bodies participation in stake
Yes It is neither better, nor worse
Furthermore, recordings No of meetings
opinion directly with the European CommissionIt isshould
better be extended to all levels of officials, such
Confindustria is not in No opinion No opinion
All direct interactions Yes No opinion
No opinion No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
- Any participation in expert groups, advisory groups, market access groups
In the interim period before a legally-binding lobby register comes into force, the following interactions should be made conditio
- Any attendance by Commission staff and commissioners at meetings and other events organised by lobbyists
European Commission:
European Parliament:
Any lobby meeting with any Commission official
- All meetings by MEPs, their staff and Parliament with lobbyists
Any participation in expert groups, advisory groups, market access groups
- All events in the Parliament's premises organised by lobbyists
Any attendance by Commission staff and commissioners at meetings and
- Any participation by MEPs, their staff and Parliament staff at events and activities organised by lobbyists
other events organised byNolobbyists
-SUEZ believes thatinevents
Any participation official opinion
Parliament intergroups and unofficial cross-party No opinion
groups which organise events inside the Parliam
Ceci n'empchera en rien No No opinion
European Parliament:
European Council, the Council, and member states:
In general,
All meetingsfindbythe
MEPs, their staff and Parliament with lobbyistsbe adequate.
- Any lobby we
meeting current
held No
advantages
by opinion
President linked
Donald to registration
Tusk, members oftohis Cabinet,
It is and staffbetter,
neither from the
nor secretariat
worse
All events in the Parliament's premises organised by lobbyists
- Any lobby meeting held by the General Secretariat TheofEuropean
the Council Council and Council of the European Union are EU institutions
Any participation
However, additional No opinion
by MEPs, their staff andtoParliament staff It is neither
at eventsrepresentatives better,
and activities organised nor worse
bytolobbyists
- Any lobby meeting measures
held by theare necessary
Permanent ensure that
Representations all
oninterest
EU decision-making matters with a view influencing the EU decis
Any participation in official
No Parliament
opinion intergroups and unofficial cross-party
It is groups
better which organise events inside the Parli
- Any lobby meeting held by staff from the European Recently
External
published
Action Services,
research by high-level
ALTER representative
EU (http://alter-eu.org/documents/201
Federica Mogherini an
[1] http://www.transparencyinternational.eu/2015/10/joint-letter-for-a-mandatory-eu-lobby-register/
Yes It is better
European Council, the Council,Yes and member states
Yet even if all of these incentives are implemented, The
they
EUwill
institutions lead No
still only should aopinion
to workde facto
to ensure
mandatory
loopholes
register.
are closed
There by
remains
any agree
a pr
Any lobby meeting held by President Donald Tusk, members of his Cabinet, and staff from the secretariat
Yes No opinion
Any lobby meeting held by the general secretariat of the Council
The
minute
Any lobbyyoumeeting
make the Yes by the permanent representations
held We think they on should parNo opinion matters
EU decision-making
Any lobby meeting held by staff from the European
The European
ExternalCouncil
Action Services,
and Council
high-level
are significant
representative
EU institutions
Federicaand
Mogherin
importa
However, it is important to
Yes
remember that even if However,
all of theseif there
incentives
is no are
likelihood
It implemented,
is neither
thatbetter,
these
theynor
bodies
will still
willonly
joinlead
the register,
to a de facto
the Cm
By imposing registration Yes No opinion
Yes It is better
No opinion It is better
No It is neither better, nor worse
Organisations on the tra Yes We include the Council i No opinion
No opinion No opinion
No comment No opinion Our view on this would dIt is neither better, nor
No opinion No opinion
No opinion It is better
No opinion It istoneither
Participation of the Council the TRbetter, nor worse
is welcome as long as it can be done w
The current TR is de fac Yes The Council is
Participation offormed ofItnational
the Councilistoneither
the ministers,
TRbetter, nor
their participation
is welcome as long as it would
can becreate
done wp
The current TR is de fac Yes The Council is formed ofItnational
is neither
ministers,
better, nor
their participation would create p
There should be a distincYes BUT only if this would No opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes of course. The Transp
Yes We completely agree on No
i opinion
No opinion No opinion
Yes It is better
It is regrettable that the European Council and Council are not part of the reg
Yes No opinion
Yes Le
Meeting with EC officials, participation in expert orThe CNB
advisory se positionne
register
groups, enIt isthe
shouldparticipation
include neither better,
European
at official nor of the Council
events
Council, EU institutions,
of the EUPartici
and
Unregistered lobby orga Yes Only General SecretariatNo opinion
Nevertheless we believeNo opinion
that the most efficient and
In case
practical
this does
solution toItmake
is neither
notishappen, it the better, nor
is important
register worse
mandatory.
nonetheless that the European C
Yes No opinion
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
No opinion It is neither better, nor worse
Interactions with other Yes Hill+Knowlton believes t It is neither better, nor
All interactions should b Yes No opinion
Yes No opinion
Die Eintragung sollte Be Yes No opinion
Yes We would welcome the conclusion It is better of an Interinstitutional Agreement, as the o
In principle, we think no access should be given to any official for lobbyingNo
Yes As long as lobbyists will be able
opinion
purpose towithout
reach out to legislators
being registered.from theare
There Council
surelyw
We also realize that this Yes
is a rule easier to enforce The
to staff
Council
members
is a keythan
par to
It is
elected
better
Interactions with lobbying organisations that should be made conditional upon prior registration, should include: politicians.
- Any meeting with anyNo opinion
Commission official It is neither better, nor
- Attendance by Commission No officials and their staff in any "expert group", It is"think
bettertank", "market access group" or any other c
The - All meetings
Register with be
should Members
Yes of Parliament or their
m staff
We believe the register No opinion
Wir- Events
sind derinMeinung, dass inorganised
the Parliament der Zwischenzeit, bevor ein gesetzlich verpflichtendes Lobbyregister in Kraft tritt, die folgenden
by lobbyists
- Attendance by Members of Parliament and their staff in any "expert group", "think tank", "market access group" or any othe
Europische Yes No opinion
- All social Kommission:
events set up for the purpose of discussing policy issues
- jedwede
- EventsLobbytreffen mit Kommissionsangestellten
held by the President of the Council, members of his Cabinet and their staff
- jedwede
- EventsPartizipation an
NoExpertInnen-Gruppen,
held by the general opinion Beratungsgruppen und Marktzugangsgruppen
secretariat of the Council It is neither better, nor worse
- jedweder Auftritt von Kommissionsangestellten
Yes
- Events held by the permanent representations onKommissarInnen
und EU matters aufNo Veranstaltungen,
opinion die von LobbyisInnen organisiert s
- Events held by the European
Yes External Action Negotiators
The
Services,
CouncilFederica
of the
at the level
EU,
Mogherini
as Nothe
of opinion
and her are
Council Cabinet
representatives of member states a
Europisches Parlament:
We think the current scopNo It is better
- alle Treffen von MdEPs und ihren MitarbeiterInnen, sowie MitarbeiterInnen des Parlaments, mit LobbyistInnen
- alle Treffen auf dem Gelnde des Parlaments, die von LobbyistInnen organisiert sind
- jedwede Partizipation von YesMdEPs, deren MitarbeiterInnen und MitarbeiterInnen It is better
des Parlaments bei Veranstaltungen und Akt
-Actually
jedwede I consider that inYes
Partizipation offiziellen Intergroups des I consider everyund
Parlaments EUinoffiziellen
instiIt is neither better, nor Gruppen, die Veranstaltunge
berparteilichen
The Council and European Council should also join the register, and hence should also look into implementing incentives for lo
Europarat, Rat, und Mitgliedsstaaten
Yes It is neither better, nor
-Registration
jedwede Lobbytreffen
is already mit Prsident
required for anDonald
access Tusk,
badge Mitgliedern
to the seines
European Kabinetts
Parliament und Angestellten
for example, but des
we Sekretariat
believe that theand
institutio
meet officials of the three main institutions (European Commission, European Parliament, Council), organise events, parti
- jedwede Lobbytreffen mit dem Sekretariat des Rates
Yes No opinion
-Wejedwede
believeLobbytreffen der Stndigen
that registration should be Vertretungen
a requirementzu forThemen,
access to dieCommission
EU Entscheidungsprozesse
expert groups and beinhalten
advisory groups or Europea
- jedwede Lobbytreffen mit Angestellten des Europischen Auswrtigen Dienstes, der hohen Vertreterin Federica Mogherini un
Meetings with
Mandatory any officiinYes
registration the Transparency Register It isfor
neither better, nor
Commission, Council and Parliament officials should should also be required
avoid attending events organised organisations and bodies
by lobbyists participation
that have in stake
not registered, if
Es ist wichtig zu betonen,Yes dass selbst wenn all diese Anreize durchgesetztNo opinionsie doch nur zu einem quasi-verpflichtende
werden,
The European Commission's Yes policy of not meeting Der Europische
unregistered Rat undNo
lobbyists shouldopinion
be extended to cover all Commission officials
Yes Sous rserve de respecte It is better
Members of the European YesParliament should be under We believe,
the obligation
as stated to abIt
list their
is neither
interactions
better, nor
with lobby groups, and to refuse m
Good practices or lessonsFinallearned
comments
at the
orEU
ideas
Member
Publication
on anyState
additional
oflevel
yourto
co
subjects
beJustification:
considered,
that youorconsider
pitfalls to
important
be avoided.
in the
(Optional)
context
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
El Registro de TranspareAdjunto documento. I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
The UK Register of Consultant Lobbyists containsI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
The exclusion of law firms as contained in certai I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Lobbying persons and the Finanztransparenz (sourcI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
The situation is very di Take a look at the US fe I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
The transparency register itself is significantl I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
It depends on the national lobby registry, impor I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
It is not reasonable to oblige registrants to make I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
A UE deve criar uma poltica de harmonizao I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
l'un n'empche pas les arespecter l'avis des cit I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Je ne sais pas si a exi I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Soy escritor de un libro I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse Il serait idal que le r I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
In Portugal the problem iI also think that EU Ins I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
l'enregistrement journalieI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
The EU Transparency Register is now a vital part of the policy-making process.
Deutlicch besser und einfacher. Es ist zudem ko I agree to my contribution being published.
Across the whole European Union
The TR there
still are
hassix
some
Memberflaws States
which stem
who have
from mandatory
the fact thatregisters
not all major
at theinterest
national
representatives
level (Austria, ha
Ire
The first example is the UK
Making
where thetheRegister I mandatory
agree
definition to mywould
of interest contribution
neither being
representativeimprove published.
is so narrow
the status
thatquo
onlynor
1%solve
of organisations
the issue of and
dispri
Secondly, Lithuanias mandatory
The voluntary
registersystemI agree
excludes
has mostto my
worked contribution
interest givenbeing
so fargroups its
such published.
9000
asentries
businessin less
associations,
than 5 years.
trade unions, relig
Thirdly, in Slovenia, the definitions
Providing more
of interest I agree
incentives to my
representatives contribution
and creating being
anda targets are published.
strengthened fairly
checks
broadandbutsanctions
the registration
systemitself
would
exclude
help
I agree to my contribution being published.
Publicit du registre : I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Vereinfachter Zugang f I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
There is no existing Lobby register in Italy (at I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Nationales Register in sterreich ist mir nicht be I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I don't know anything about lobbying in my membe I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
none of those archieve wh
This survey is a joke an I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Engage in discussions wI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Se a Europa no incluir partidos e outros vai s I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
There is no comparable register in Denmark. I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
There is a fine balance bI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
We very much welcome Ithe agree to my contribution
opportunity being
to contribute published.
to this consultation as we find participation in the
Not aware of the availab I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I suspect better but can The use of the word mand I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Due to lacking transparen
As stated above: Since lI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Germany does not have such a register so that i I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I don't know, but member state level politics is I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree toprocess.
It is good to see this consultation my contribution
Howeverbeing
it willpublished.
be important that the process of the inter-ins
I agree to my contribution being published.
It is useful for national Finally, all EU institutionsI should
agree to
conduct
my contribution
regular reviews
being published.
of their transparency rules and the way in w
I agree to my contribution being published.
It is good to see this consultation process. However it will be important that the process of the inter-ins
I agree to my contribution being published.
Finally, all EU institutionsI should
agree to my contribution
conduct being published.
regular reviews of their transparency rules and the way in w
The situation at Member I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I'm not sure that there a See above, this is a feebI agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
It is disappointing that this
It is
consultation
good to seehas I agree
thisconfined itselftoprocess.
consultation tomy contribution
only look
However being
at good willpublished.
it practice
be important
in the EUthat
when
thethere
process
are of
well-known
the inter-ins
a
I agree to my contribution being published.
ALTER-EU considers that Finally,
the EUallinstitutions
EU institutions
should
I should
agree
set best
toconduct
my
practice
contribution
regular
standards
reviews
beingforpublished.
ofstrong
their transparency
transparencyrules
requirements
and the way
to serve
in w
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
all Commission and EP an I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
Przede wszystkim zastanI agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Liste wre zu lang. All I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
In many capitals or national, regional or local authI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Prepte na vinu otI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
In Portugal, there are no register about the lob I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
It chages a lot from country to country I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Tha main pitfall to be av The link to the Specific I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
In Ireland a working system like the Transparenc I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree
Ik ben niet op de hoogte van de lobbyregisters van to my contribution
de lidstaten. being
Ik weet alleen ietspublished.
van Nederland en van de rest weet ik weini
Mijn mening over het Nederlandse lobbyregistersI isagree
dat het
to my
eencontribution
wassen neus being
is. Ik
published.
hoop dat het nieuwe EU register meer bod
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Comme tout ce qui a traiSi les institutions EU ne I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
An old issue is the fact In the case of indirect I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Danmark har ikke et etableret sammenligneligt loI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
In sterreich ist die Ei Die BAK begrt den vorI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Italy lacks a proper law concerning lobbying and I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Most EU national systems are poor, have too many
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
V rog s ne ajutai s I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Mutual Recognition Agr I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Sweden does not have any regulation or registratio
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
The whole business of prI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
This consultation processI agree to my contribution
is a positive being
step in the right published.
direction, however it is important that the inter-
I agree to my contribution being published.
Finally, all EU institutionsI should
agree to conduct
my contribution
regular reviews
being published.
of their transparency rules and the way in w
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Regulating lobbying can be effective only if it involves I agree both
to lobbyists and decision
my contribution makers. Good practice should ensure obliga
being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Pecuniary sanctions are absolutely necessary to ensure effective compliance with the registry. In Italy, a number of Regions ha
I agree to my contribution being published.
Please also find a position It ispaper
goodintoItalian
see this our Irecommendations
agree toprocess.
on consultation my contribution
However being
it willpublished.
for a mandatory belobby
important
registry
thattothe
beprocess
adoptedofinthe
Italy,
inter-ins
http:/
I agree to my contribution being published.
It's really
Additionally, in Italy thereFinally,
is some allvery good as
confusion thetoI the
EU institutions agree
should to my contribution
definition
conduct
of aregular
lobbyistsbeing
and published.
reviews whether
of their transparency
it includes non-professional
rules and the way lobbyist
in w
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
It is disappointing that this
It is
consultation
good to seehas I agree
thisconfined itselftoprocess.
consultation tomy contribution
only look
However being
at good willpublished.
it practice
be important
in the EUthatwhenthethere
process
are of
well-known
the inter-insa
Rendere obbligatorio il r Sarebbe necessario che Ii agree to my contribution being published.
CEO considers that the EU Finally,
institutions
all EU institutions
should setI best
should
agreepractice
toconduct
my contribution
standards
regular reviews
for
being
strongpublished.
of transparency
their transparencyrequirements
rules andtothe
serve
wayas in an
w
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
It is good to see this consultation process. However it will be important that the process of
the inter-institutional agreement which follows is also conducted openly; previous
processes have been farI too opaque.
agree to my Meetings of the
contribution high-level
being published.working group of the
European Commission, Parliament and Council that will discuss
I agree to my contribution being published. the new IIA should be
open to the public and web-streamed. The draft agreement, proposed changes, agendas
I agree to my contribution being published.
and minutes should be made available online promptly.
Die
Finally, all EU institutionsI should
hier wiedergegebenen agree to my contribution
conduct being published.
regular reviews of their transparency rules and
I agree to my contribution
the way in which they are implemented so as to constantly being published.
strive for better and more
The EU should set best practice
comprehensive
As statedstandards
throughout I contribution
agree
transparency.
for our
strong to my contribution
transparency
This would
to include,
this being
requirements
but published.
notto
consultation, beserve
limited
as to,
BUSINESSEUROPEan the
example
EU lobby
for members
fully shares the politica
states transparency register. I agree to my contribution being published.
The European TransparencThe business communityI supports
agree to my
mostcontribution
elements of being
the ETI,
published.
but also recalls that too many transparen
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Participation in EU deb The subject of the lobbi I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Die Beteiligung am Konsu I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Simplicity is key. The The whole focus of this cI agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Further important changes beyond the legally binding lobby register are required:
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
Improved monitoring of the data entries, as lobbyists frequently enter inaccurate or even frivolous d
In our opinion it is imp AllImproved
Europeansanctions
institutiontoI punish
agree to my contribution
inaccurate being published.
or misleading information, such as through suspension fro
I agree to my contribution
All EU decision-makers should be banned from meeting being published.
with unregistered lobbyists and should obli
Lobby rules should apply I agree
alsototomy
thecontribution being published.
European Council, the Council of Ministers and Permanent Re
DIe USA sind strikter un ITCO welcome the realisation I agreeofto my contribution
a mandatory being published.
transparency register. The coming into existence of a m
I agree to my contribution being published.
The mandatory characterI agreeof the to
register should be being
my contribution realised by on the one hand suspending privileges
published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
In the IIA 2014, it is stated that: to my contribution being published.
I agree
Article 35. The European Council and the Council are invited to join the register. Other EU institutions
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse ITCO suggests that otherI agree to my contribution
EU institutions, bodies and being published.
agencies are encouraged to use the framework
I agree to my contribution being published.
We recommend includingI agree to my contribution
a connection between the being published.Register and the legislative footprin
Transparency
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
We would welcome an open
I agree
Pour viter toutes surcharges to my contribution
administratives, being published.
les performances du registre pourraient tre amliore
Comme indiqu tout au long I agree
de notre
to my contribution
contribution being
cettepublished.
consultation, le MEDEF partage pleinement
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
La France s'orientant vers un registre obligatoire,I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
better, nor worse I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
At a member state level, we should prevent too mu I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Concerning
A lobby EU Directive migLobby is a misused termiIMember
national experiences, the majority of agree toStates that feature
my contribution a registration
being published.system have chosen the mandatory
better and more succesfull. often it is easier to g I agree to my contribution being published.
The specificity of various entities is recognised byI means
agree toofmy
exemptions
contributionor specific provisions - with different rationales and in
being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
Concerning rather more negative experiences, in the UK, the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-party Campaigning and Trade U
As in Spain the Transparency register has only juI agree to my contribution being published.
Going beyond EU borders, as encouraged by theI recent agree to my contribution
public hearing on thebeing published.
topic, the seminal experience of the American le
Too difficult to answer a There should be a mandat I agree to my contribution being published.
Essentially, European and international experiences I agree
showtothat
my the
contribution
specificity
being
of certain
published.
entities, including Churches and religio
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
I agree to my contribution being published.
guidance on how to fill out
legislation.
registration and the objectives of the register to both lobbyists and public