Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TRANSLATOR'S NOTE
This little book offers the first opportunity to
introduce its author, Isaiah A. Braudo (1896-
1970), to the English-speaking musical
community. Published in Leningrad in 1965
and reprinted in 1979, the book has become
the bible to music school teachers across the
former Soviet Union, and it is still held in
high esteem as an authoritative guide to the
study and performance of keyboard works by
J. S. Bach.
One can hardly expect a casual browser to
comprehend the reverence enjoyed by this
book or to see in it but a tip of an iceberg.
For, behind the detailed analyses, meticulous
, Henry Orlov Braudo technical discussions, and practical
Braudo instructions, there lies a half-century
Braudo experience of an uncommonly versatile
musician, scholar, and teacher to whom
Bach's music had remained a constant
challenge and the fertile ground for ideas and
endeavors.
Braudo To the patrons of concert halls in his
homeland Braudo was first of all a great
Julian Martin organist. From the early 1920's and through
his last years Braudo captivated musical
audiences in many Russian cities by his
strikingly individual, irresistibly convincing
interpretations of Bach's organ compositions.
He was able to expand and use the vast
potential of this instrument because not only
he knew its intricate workings from inside
out, like a professional organ-builder, but also
because he recognized and appreciated the
specific historical origin and unique 'soul' in
each particular organ he happened to
encounter.
The organ was the first choice of the young musician enrolled in
1914 to Saint Petersburg Conservatory where Ya. Ghandshin, guidance of M. Barinova, and continued these
the Swiss organist and musicologist, a pupil of Max Reger and studies during the next five years with A.
Charles Vidor, became his mentor for a number of years. In his Goldenweiser in Moscow and A. Blumenfeld
insatiable urge to learn more, Braudo later travelled abroad to in Odessa.
Paris in 1924 and to Berlin, Hamburg, and Leipzig in 1926 However, for all his great accomplishments in
where he met and consulted with leading European organists of both fields, Braudo was neither dedicated
the time. exclusively to the organ, nor to the piano or
It may seem strange that this consummate organist devoted harpsichord. Rather he was, like Albert
himself with equally great vigor to mastering the piano, an Schweitzer, primarily a scholar devoted to the
instrument that has nothing in common with the organ except study and interpretation of Bach's musical
the keyboard. From his freshman year at the Conservatory, legacy which inspired and informed his
alongside his organ studies, Braudo took piano lessons under the performance activities. But, unlike
Schweitzer, he was also a born educator.
Braudo's life-long teaching career in his alma
mater started in 1923. During nearly five
Isaiah A. Braudo (1896-1970). 1965 decades he concurrently conducted two
1979 classes organ and piano. These were not
separate but closely connected and mutually
complementary. Almost all of his piano
students dreamed of becoming organ players.
But the lucky ones already accepted to the
organ class were doubly baffled and
disappointed: regardless of their level of
musicianship and specialization, they were
presented with the challenging task of coping
with Bach's Little Preludes and Inventions,
Braudo and had to do this, not at the organ, but at the
20 20 Braudo piano!
The seemingly easy two-voice pieces turned
out to be exceedingly difficult to perform in a
natural and meaningful way. Faced with the
necessity to control the dynamic level,
placement, and quality of each tone relative
to the overall context, the students felt
1914 exposed and awkward, not knowing how to
Ya.GhandshinMax Reger make the performance musically satisfying. It
Charles Vidor Braudo was there that Braudo's ideas about
1924 1926 performance of Bach's keyboard
compositions took root and then, over the
years, were developed, refined, and
crystallized.
Braudo believed that, in performing Bach's
music, no detail, however small, is
unimportant. One of his most difficult requirements was to devices becomes inseparable from
achieve a 'unity of the sound plane' for a particular voice which spontaneity of artistic feeling. But the field to
would set it apart from the other voices. Thus, he expected his which the art of articulation applies is much
students to recreate on the piano the effect easily available on wider. Logical, sensible shaping of structural
the organ and the harpsichord by merely choosing a keyboard units of different magnitudes and hierarchical
and setting a register for each voice. levels, from motif and phrase through
Keeping each voice within its particular 'sound plane' by no composition as a whole, helps to grasp and
means implies that all its tones must be timbrally homogeneous reveal the rhetorical eloquence of Bach's
M.Barinova music.
A.Goldenweiser A.Blumenfeld As the reader of this book will not fail to
Braudo notice, analytical results and suggestions
derived from an objective approach to Bach's
musical texts are least of all dogmatic.
Characteristically, Braudo immediately and
enthusiastically embraced Glenn Gould's
unorthodox interpretations of Bach, was
1923 Braudo fascinated by the vocal rendition of Bach's
instrumental pieces by the Swingle Singers,
and avidly listened to pieces of his favorite
composer in various jazz arrangements.
Braudo's teaching method can be defined as
heuristic. He himself called it 'the method of
variants.' Often, when working in class on the
same piece a week later, he would come up
with a new performance plan and devices
which were quite different from those
developed earlier. At such occasions the
Braudo puzzled students had no choice but to
sacrifice the contentment of the previously
found solution and to work out a new one. As
Braudo repeatedly stressed, 'the very
Braudo expectation of finding the one and only true
rule is harmful. Such expectations make the
student blind to the real diversity of possible
solutions and to the vast possibilities of music
itself.' The 'method of variants', in his view,
helped the learner assimilate and solidify the
entire spectrum of possible interpretations
and dynamically even. A performance of Bach's music is lifeless thus making rational analysis of musical
and mechanical unless every melodic idea is presented logically syntax a springboard for improvisatory
and emphatically, so as to create the impression of an engaging artistic freedom.
utterance, a spoken sentence. This task requires from the student He was well prepared to deal not only with
a total command of the art of articulation. Here matter-of-fact diverse issues of interpreting Bach's musical
analysis of various motivic types and corresponding articulatory ideas but also with psychological and
physiological aspects of playing an instrument. In his early 20's which he called 'the entrance into the stream
Braudo studied mathematical logic at the Odessa University of playing.' His principle idea was to match
the pianist's motions, as formed by the
music's texture, pace, and emotional tonus, to
the natural muscular potentials of the human
body, as it is evident in the act of singing or
speaking. Braudo insisted that the pianist's
hands, arms, and body must 'speak the music'
in order to make it an effective vehicle of
communication. 'The culture of motions
degenerates as the interest to articulation
decreases,' he wrote. 'The art of articulation
was vital to Bach's music, so much so that
Braudo correcting the articulation of an orchestral
Swingle Singers part was to him more important than
correcting the notes.'
Braudo was by no means a secluded cabinet
thinker. His scholarly and artistic explorations
were conducted in constant cooperation with
Braudo younger colleagues. From 1926 he led the
Bach Circle at the Leningrad Institute for the
History of the Arts. Ten years later he
Braudo organized another Bach Circle at the
Leningrad Conservatory, which functioned,
with active participation of several of the
Conservatory professors, until the beginning
of the World War II. After the War Braudo
resumed his educator's mission; during a
dozen years he conducted a weekly seminar
for piano teachers of Leningrad music
schools.
Braudo This experience is reflected in a number of
articles, papers, and books written by Braudo
and published either during his life or
A few years earlier, while continuing his musical studies, he posthumously The most important of them is
entered the Moscow State University where, for three years, he the book Articulation subtitled 'On the
studied in the Department of Medicine and participated in Pronunciation of Melody' (Leningrad, 1961,
seminars on philosophy, and Pavlovian physiology, among other 2nd ed. 1973). Here, in a highly systematic
subjects. In his mature years he often shared his ideas with way, the author discusses aspects of
leading Russian physiologists. articulation in different stylistic conditions,
Little wonder that one of his works was directly related to the including works of Mozart, Beethoven,
study of pianists' movements. It centered on a discussion of the
initial movements which establish the logical and emotional
character of the entire act of a particular performance, and
Braudo
Braudo
1926
Braudo
cognitive task so advanced and difficult should be put before
youngsters who continue to struggle with the rudiments of
music. Is it at all possible to explain the meaning of an author's
text to a student who is still unsure about identifying the notes in
the treble clef? Here much depends on the teacher's tact. Isn't it
this instrument. However, since it is sensitive
to the quality of touch, a melody can be
enriched with certain flexibility of the tones
and even with vibrato.
As distinct from the clavichord's soulful,
intimate tone, the harpsichord's sound is
resonant and bright. Pressing one key,
depending on the player's choice, activates
from one to four strings. The typical
instrument of Bach's time had two keyboards
the lower one (indicated: manual I) and
the upper one (indicated: manual II). The
keyboards ranged from G to d3. Later, the
range was extended to f3 and g3. However, in
reality, the tone range is much wider.
The harpsichord has several sets of strings.
The set whose pitches correspond to the
written notes (as in example 2a) is defined as
the 8-foot register, or 8'. The set that sounds
an octave higher (2b) is the 4-foot register, or
4'. And the set that sounds an octave below
the written notes (2c) is the 16-foot register,
or 16'.
Overall, the harpsichord has four sets of
strings, i.e., four registers, which are
distributed among the two manuals in the
following way: manual I has one 8-foot and
one 16-foot register; manual II one 8-foot
and one 16-foot register. The player can
switch each or all of the registers on or off by
means of special levers. Furthermore, the
HARPSICHORD AND CLAVICHORD player can couple the manuals so that when a
The second difficulty encountered in Bach's keyboard key is pressed on one manual then the
compositions is the fact that they were by no means intended for respective key on
the forte-piano.
They were written for the instruments that in the 18th century
bore the generic name 'clavier,' and a piece written for any
keyboard instrument was classified as 'clavier piece'. Of the
three main keyboard instruments of the time (harpsichord,
clavichord, and organ) we shall discuss performance issues 18 clavier
related to the first two.
Clavichord is a small instrument with a correspondingly soft clavier piece
tone. Pressing a key makes only one string produce a sound.
Strong variations in volume and sharp contrasts are foreign to
In order to make the music sound imposing
and bright, all four registers may be turned on
and the manuals coupled:
The initial tutti of the Italian Concerto
will, in this case, sound as follows:
G d3 f3 g3
2a 8 8'
2b 4 4'
2c 16 16'
I 8 16 8
16
I
the other manual is also lowered producing an additional tone an
octave higher or lower. When all four registers are switched on
and the manuals are coupled, then in response to each key
pressed on manual I, four strings will sound. The total sound
becomes widespread and enriched with upper and lower octave
doublings.
To complete the description of the harpsichord's sound
resources, one should mention the device called 'Laute' (lute).
Moving a special lever dampens the strings of the chosen 8 C
register making the sound softer and shorter, more like the lute
sound.
Below are some brief examples which illustrate the effects of
a harpsichord's registration. 4
When the beginning of the Little Prelude in C major is played
with only the 8-foot register, the sound will correspond to the 16
written pitches:
If only the 4-foot register is used then the same measures will
sound an octave higher:
With the 16-foot register it will sound an octave below the
notated:
dominates, it must blend with the upper voice
in a restrained and not excessively bright
sound. The Prelude can be 'orchestrated' thus:
the left hand plays on manual I with one 8-
foot register, and the right on manual II, also
with one 8-foot register, muted by employing
the Laute register. The resulting dynamics
will be: 13 II (81 Laute)
1-29
30
By changing manuals and registers, different colors can be
applied to different parts of a piece. For instance, in the first
movement of the Italian Concerto, after the initial tutti (bars 1- tutti
29) in bar 30, Bach prescribes forte in the right hand and piano 16 8 4
in the left:
This forte, unlike the tutti, is usually played without the 16- 8
foot register. The right hand now plays on the manual II which
uses two registers (8' + 4') (forte), while the left hand plays on D
the manual I with only the 8-foot register switched on (piano).
The resulting sound is this: 21
In the Little Prelude in D Major, the following distribution of 37
manuals would be quite consistent with Bach's spirit. It begins 40
with a full sound of the manual I (forte). From measure 21 (the
second section) both hands play on the manual II (piano). In bar
37 the right hand returns to the manual I, followed in bar 40 (on
the last eighth) by the left hand (forte):
Below are but a few examples illustrating the possible ways
of playing, on the harpsichord, pieces in which two voices have ..
different functions (i.e., melody and accompaniment). In such G
cases it is reasonable to make use of both manuals. 8
In the G Major Minuet from "Little Notebook of Anna 8
Magdalena Bach," to bring out the right-hand part without mf
resorting to octave doublings, the two manuals, each using one p
8-foot register, should be coupled. Then two 8-foot registers will
respond to manual I and only one to manual II. The right hand C
will sound vtf, and the left p:
In the Little Prelude in C Minor the melodic idea appears in
the lower voice. However, the pensive, contemplating mood of 8
the piece would be compromised by an overly contrasting 8
coloration of the two voices. Even though the lower voice
It is necessary to mention a particular implementation of the 4- 4
foot register. In the 17th and 18th centuries the 4-foot register
was employed, not only in addition to the basic 8-foot register to ..
achieve upper octave doublings, but also independently, and as a Bagpipe II -4'
result, the music sounded an octave higher than notated. Such I-8'
use of the 4-foot register was not always indicated by the text.
The contemporary performer may see an octave transposition as
an improper liberty, but in Bach's time in certain cases
(depending on the specific characteristics of a particular
instrument, the acoustics of the room, etc.) a performer did not
hesitate to give preference to, and freely employ the 4-foot
register. This can be especially effective in fast and lively as
well as song-like pieces. For instance, it is quite appropriate to 1.
perform the Bagpipe from "Little Notebook of Anna Magdalena 2.
Bach" by playing with the right hand II-4', and with the left 3.
hand I-8', in which case the music will sound as follows:
To summarize this brief discourse of the harpsichord's sound
resources, the use of the manuals and registers makes it possible
1. to vary the character of a musical piece,
2. to provide various sections within a piece with different
coloration, and
3. to provide different coloration to the two voices of a two-
part piece (or to the two groups of voices in a multipart
composition).
The resulting diversity of sound can emphasize the music's
character as well as clarify its structure. It must be pointed out,
however, that manuals and registers were never switched in the
middle of a melody, for rather than increasing its flexibility and
expressiveness, this would tear it rudely into artificially
separated fragments.
On the harpsichord melodic flexibility is achieved, not by
means of dynamics, but by two other features that make not by the soft hammer head (as on the
harpsichord playing particularly impressive, namely, by means piano). The string is not struck, but plucked
of rhythm and articulation. by the wedge which conveys the pressure
On the harpsichord, rhythm plays an especially important role exerted by the player's finger on the key
due to certain technical properties of the instrument. The sound directly to the string. The plucked string
of the harpsichord string is caused by the little hard wedge, sounds sharp and clear, and this provides a
4 17 18 4 graphic clarity to the rhythmic outline in a
8 series of tones.
4 The role of articulation in playing the
harpsichord is difficult to exaggerate, since this instrument does
not have the right pedal of the piano which allows to blend,
prolong, or dampen the complex sound summarily. On the
harpsichord, on the contrary, connecting and detaching the tones
in each voice individually must be achieved only by proper
actions of the player's fingers on the keys.
Turning to the issue of performing harpsichord pieces on the
modern piano, we shall begin with the use of dynamics which
must receive entirely different treatment on these two
instruments
IV
DYNAMICS
Having compared the dynamic resources of
the fortepiano, on the one hand, and of the
harpsichord and clavichord, on the other, we
can summarize:
1) The fortepiano has neither registers to
change nor two manuals that permit octave
doublings and contrasts of sound on the
harpsichord, nor the expressive vibrato of the
clavichord.
2) Instead, the fortepiano offers a much
wider dynamic range, and, furthermore, it
affords the performer an extremely fine and
flexible control over the volume and sound
coloration inaccessible to either harpsichord
or clavichord.
How, then, are Bach's pieces for
harpsichord or clavichord to be played on the
contemporary piano? How should we use its
rich dynamic capabilities unknown to
performers in the 18th century? Ignoring
these possibilities is out of the question. A
remarkable property of the piano lies in its openness to music of
very different historical periods and styles. Mastering the piano
means, among other things, developing the ability to employ
those of its resources which are appropriate to the given musical
style. And one of the necessary areas for such development is
the study of Bach's clavier works.
It should be made clear from the very outset that the goal here
is not to mimic the sound of the old instruments, but to find the
dynamic means by which Bach's clavier pieces can receive a
true and meaningful realization.
On the harpsichord the volume of a given note does not
depend on how the key is pressed. The harpsichordist cannot
control the sound's qualities while playing; the desired register
has to be set up prior to the performance. The pianist, on the 'auditory picture' of the piece can be called
other hand, has no levers to pull or push before playing a piece; 'piano orchestration.'
instead he must imagine, in advance, the desired dynamic plan, Sometimes due to accidental
the coloration and shading, and then to create them during the circumstances, technical or psychological,
course of performance. pieces very different in character are played
Therefore the teacher's first task is to develop in the student within the same gamut of sound qualities.
the ability to produce tones of certain qualities called for in the Most often this happens when the student
given piece. The ability to make logical and consistent choices pays too much attention to so-called dynamic
and, following a chosen dynamic plan, to present an organized markings, executing them in an exaggerated,
IV random or forced manner. The usual result
then is a monotonous patchwork of dynamic
fortepiano contrasts indiscriminately applied to pieces
very different in character.
1fortepiano To help the student in developing an
individual dynamic and coloristic plan
revealing the unique character of a piece, the
2fortepiano teacher should appeal to the student's
imagination. For instance, the majestic,
festive Little Prelude in C major can be
likened to a short orchestral overture
punctuated by trumpets and timpani. The
18 contemplative Little Prelude in E minor can
be interpreted as if it were a piece for a small
chamber ensemble with oboe solo and
accompanying strings.
The next step in developing the skill of
piano orchestration is the exercise in
juxtaposing elements of different volumes
and qualities. The student should understand
that dynamic and coloristic variations are
highly effective means of setting sections of a
piece apart one from the other. However, juxtapositions of
different dynamic levels will sound crude if the pupil's attention
is focused only on the prescribed contrasts and disregards the
context of the piece as a whole. In order to sound natural,
dynamic shading and coloring must be felt as subtle nuances On the contrary, we expect the dynamics,
within the range of a well-chosen overall tone color of the piece. within the boundaries of the chosen particular
In developing sensitivity to the piano's coloristic possibilities, gamut of sound qualities, to be as flexible and
it is extremely important to practice playing two voices of a expressive as the melody itself.
piece in contrasting orchestration. In the simplest case, each of Thus, dynamics serves two different ends.
the voices should retain its particular color and character On one level, it is used to endow the melody
throughout. Such exercises are absolutely indispensable in with a certain orchestral color; this function
mastering the piano's dynamic capabilities, particularly in the can be defined as orchestral shading. On the
polyphonic styles. other level, it serves to enhance flexibility
Although neither on the harpsichord nor on the piano can the and expressiveness of melodic material, and
orchestration be changed from one motif to the next, this is not to reinforce its logically correct presentation;
to say that the melody is confined to a constant dynamic level. this function can be called melodic shading.
The piano cannot compete with the
harpsichord in creating juxtapositions of
distinctly contrasting sound planes, but it by
far surpasses its old predecessor in the
capacity to animate the sound with endlessly
changing, flexible dynamics.
Melodic shading is, by definition, different
from orchestral shading. It is more detailed,
since it accompanies all the turns, crests and
C troughs of the melody, and often very
delicate, since it must remain within the range
of the overall tonal palette. Unlike orchestral
shading, which well may be indicated in the
text, melodic shading is difficult if not
impossible to indicate by written remarks.
Obviously, it has to be discussed and
developed at the keyboard with the aid of the
teacher rather than the editor.
Melodic shading
Dynamic nuances necessarily associated
with melody are too manifold and varied to
be listed and described. One can single out
only some issues frequently encountered in
pedagogical practice. The first of them
concerns the interpretation of dance-like
melodies; another, the execution of
polyphonic imitations; the third, the treatment
of iambic and trochaic motifs; and the last, with inflections student play at two pianos: the first 4-bar unit,
which define the direction and perspective of an unfolding the 'question/ is played by the teacher; the
melody. student 'answers' with the second four bars;
In the G major Minuet from "Little Notebook of Anna the same goes for the third and the fourth 4-
Magdalena Bach," the right hand plays the melody throughout, bar units. The teacher and the student then
accompanied by the bass in the left. Naturally, the melody must exchange places. Now the student 'asks
sound bright and clear, and the bass line lighter and softer. This, questions' and the teacher 'gives answers.' In
however, does not mean that the entire melody should be played this exercise the student learns not only to
at a constant dynamic level. To make it meaningful and play a little louder or a little softer, but also to
expressive, one has to recognize the 'question-answer' relations 'ask questions' and to 'answer' on the piano.
When offered to play the entire Minuet by
himself, the student must experiment. The
'questions' could be demanding and strong
while the 'answers' timid and soft, or vice
versa. It should be left to the student to decide
which of the versions is preferable as the one
which endows the dialogue with the
particular desired character and meaning.
Unlike orchestration shading which have to
be clearly set apart one from the other,
melodic shading is to be perceived as subtle
changes of motivic expression rather than
changes in the sound volume. The teacher
should not be afraid of the difficulties
involved because the all-important goal,
development of the student's ability to 'speak'
on the piano, is by no means beyond reach.
The exercise described above can apply to
all musical contexts where melodic
expression is confined to 2- or 4-bar units.
Another example is the Polonaise from the
French Suite in E major:
By succeeding in such relatively easy tasks
the student gains experience which will
subsequently help him or her in much more
complex situations.
The above discussion was intended to
..G demonstrate how the requisite control of the
piano's tonal palette is challenged by the
necessity of dynamic nuances called forth to
shape an expressive melodic line. However, a
4 - challenge of another kind comes from certain
between its 4-bar units: structural features of polyphonic composition
This relationship can be better understood if the teacher and itself, first of all, from the imitation.
loudness. The same effect can be achieved by
Imitation giving to the important voice a sound
Often the question is asked: 'When playing one of Bach's different, even if less sonorous, from that of
the surrounding voices.
This is particularly true in regard to the
4 bass voice. Softly played, the bass is often
perceived more distinctly against the ringing
upper voices than if it were played at the
same dynamic level and drowned in a loud
monotony. If, in the Polonaise from the
French Suite in E major, the right hand plays
energetically and with expression, and the
left, unaffected by the melodic shadings,
plays evenly at the pianissimo level, then the
bass line becomes more conspicuous and the
entire texture more transparent.
Now what about imitations? Must they be
emphasized dynamically? There can be no
simple or unambiguous answer to this
question. Marking imitations is not the most
effective device determining the performance
2 4 dynamics. There are other substantial
requirements which overshadow the issue of
imitation, one being the principle of
polyphonic orchestration.
An imitation is a reappearance of the same
melody in a different voice. Therefore, the
first condition for the very possibility of
imitation is the presence of at least two
voices, this being most evident when the
voices are performed by two different
instruments or by two singers. In such cases
each performer creates a real, distinctly
characteristic melodic line unified by the
singer's breath or the violinist's bow
polyphonic pieces on the piano, should one emphasize the movements.
imitations so plentiful in them?' Or, more specifically, 'In To achieve a similar effect on the piano is
playing a Bach fugue, should one emphasize its subject every much harder. The pianist presses a certain
time it enters?' number of keys simultaneously and in
First, let us consider what the words 'to emphasize,' 'to succession producing a number of tones that
underscore,' 'to show' in regard to a motif can imply .Certainly, belong to both voices. And it would be wrong
in a polyphonic piece the imitations or, for that matter, the to believe that this sum total of
subject of a fugue must always be heard distinctly. Yet this does
not mean that all such instances necessarily involve increased
melody threatens to break up its unity and to
erase contrast between the voices since, in
each of them, the main motif receives the
same emphasis.
Dutiful marking of every imitation throws
the very existence of two voices into doubt
and leaves the impression of one motif
aimlessly wandering over the keyboard.
There is another reason to avoid dynamic
stressing of imitations. Often, as the second
voice enters with the subject, the first voice
E continues with a counterpoint which is an
organic extension of the subject and, as such,
must be kept within the same dynamic range.
In this instance a loud entrance of the second
voice also breaks up the musical unity
For example, in the Little Prelude in C
major (example 17) an overly emphasized
imitation in bar 4 would destroy the contour
of the upper voice which rises in the initial
three bars, culminates on e, and then descends
in resolute iambic motifs:
pic
In the initial two bars of the Invention in C
Major (example ), it is important to preserve
a) the unity of the melodic line in bar 1, b) the
dynamic unity of the upper voice in both bars,
and 3) the 'question-answer' relationship
tones would, by itself, create the effect of two real voices. No between them. It is reasonable, therefore, to
matter how poorly or how well the notes are played, the treat the upper voice as dominating and
critically important and most difficult skill is the ability to create
an impression of two separate, individual voices conversing
with one another.
For this effort to succeed, the pianist must
1) provide the tones of each part with a sense of unity within
the range of melodic nuances required by it, and
2) establish a certain audible difference in character and color 1
between the parts, which is most helpful in creating the
impression of two coexisting voices. 2
It is necessary to recognize that there exists a fundamental
contradiction between orchestration of the voices and marking
(emphasizing) imitations by dynamic means. Orchestration
implies unity of character and distinct coloring of each of the
voices, whereas dynamic emphasis on the imitated part of a
1) Often the character of a piece is
determined by a motifs alternating between
the voices. This device is a key to the playful,
light, humorous character of the Invention in
F Major and the Prelude in E Major
(examples 20 a, b):
(zhong) The study of these pieces should begin
with a clear-cut marking of the imitated
motifs. Having done this, the student will be
better prepared to perceive the dialogue
between voices as well as the unity of the
C e main motif (the eights) and its continuation
(the sixteenths).
2) The marking of a motif now in one then
in another voice is quite justified within 3- or
C 1 1 4-part compact chordal progressions which
23 defeat attempts to separate the voices by
different orchestration. This enriches melodic
content of the sound texture and underscores
dynamically conspicuous. This would in no way obliterate the the logic of voice leading connecting
imitations in the lower voice, even if they were to be played
with a lighter sound:
W)
With the right hand playing the principal melody, and the
supporting voice in the left hand imitating its fragment (usually,
the beginning), overstressing of the imitation would
compromise the orchestration plane of that melody. This could E
happen, for instance, in the Little E minor Prelude:
the chords.
To sum up, there is no universally correct answer to the
question concerning the treatment of imitations. The very
expectation of finding the one and only true rule is, in fact,
harmful. Such expectations make the student blind to the real
diversity of possible solutions and to the vast possibilities of ##
music itself.
In most of the above examples we have focused on
differentiation of two voices by means of orchestration. With a
greater ciple becomes impractical. However, the experience 5 B-flat
gained in mastering 2-part pieces can be applied to working on 21
pieces with more voices.
In the exposition of the 5-part B-flat minor Fugue, W.K. I
(example 21), there is no need to mark-off the entrance of each 2 3
of the voices. It is far more important to establish a certain order 4 5
in their orchestration. It seems advisable to play the second
(alto) voice with a firm tone which will provide clarity to the 2-
and then 3-part structure. Later on, as the voice flows into the 4-
and 5-part texture, it will not be lost, providing that the pianist E-flat
maintains in it the initial firm tone up to the cadence (in the
relative major) at the end of exposition:
In the exposition of the Fugue in E-flat Minor (W.K. I), the
marking of the middle voice, the first to enter, is also desirable.
Here, too, this will help coordinate the orchestration and create
an audible axis of the entire structure:
P
Emphasizing a voice does not necessarily make it the most
prominent. This separates it from the other voices rather than
overshadows them. At the same time, by sustaining its
characteristic tone and coloring, the emphasized voice cements
the unity and serves as a reference point for the surrounding
voices thus facilitating a clearer perception of the whole.
VI
TEMPO
Whatever musical text we deal with, the
performance-related indications to be found
in it are neither comprehensive nor related to
all aspects of the piece. Subtle gradations of
tempo and volume which are necessary in a
decent performance can in no way be
precisely notated.
The degree of the 'indeterminate' varies
from one historical period to the next.
G However, no matter how wide the scope of
divergent interpretations of a piece, in a
majority of cases the limits of acceptable
character and tempo variations are reasonably
clear. It is obvious that the first movement of
Beethoven's "Moonlight" sonata cannot be
anything but calm and contemplative, and the
third movement, violent and impetuous. No
performer would decide to reverse their
characters and tempos.
With performance of early music in general and Bach's in
particular, the situation is very different. Paradoxically, one and
the same piece is sometimes treated by different performers and
editors in diametrically opposite ways. Such discrepancies can
only be explained by taking into account a number of different
factors.
1. The perception of music, which many believe to be
immediate, is, in fact, guided by numerous conditions. Much 2.
depends on one's knowledge of music in general and of the
given piece in particular, on the ability to identify and grasp the
meaning of musical elements, genres and forms, the properties
of particular trends, schools, and personal styles in composition books, editions, recordings, and live
and in performance, the features and use of various instruments. performances. Each of these sources presents
Such diverse knowledge, experience, and hearing skills are a particular idiosyncratic view on the music
essential in understanding and appreciation of early music. in question.
Thus, the first source of false impressions and mistaken Plunging into this sea of interpretations
interpretations is usually ignorance about the musical and only deepens the musician's bewilderment.
cultural environment in which that music was created. Clearly, if every performer of early music is
2. Even more often than by ignorance, false concepts are affected in very different ways by his period,
prompted by a wrong approach in familiarizing oneself with school, style, or individual predilections, then
music of the past centuries. In most cases, the musician wishing it would be futile to look for ready recipes.
to gain greater knowledge of early music turns to respective Today's musician would do better to search
for his own solution to every problem.
This is not to say that the vast experience
accumulated by generations of musicians and
scholars should be ignored. One must know
the main stages of the historical process,
works of Czerny and Btilow, the great
interpreters of Bach's legacy in the Romantic
era, the edition of "Wohltemperierte Klavier"
prepared by Busoni, the first anti-Romantic
proponent of Bach, and to compare his ideas
born in the early 20th Century with those of
subsequent decades. Neither Romantic nor
anti-Romantic trend in interpreting Bach's
music is solid, and the knowledge of each in
its diversity should warn the musician against
taking sides.
Beside the subjective factors, there is an
important objective reason that makes the
1. multitude of interpretations unavoidable.
It lies in a basic difference between
musical practices of the 19th- 20th centuries
and of the 16th-18th centuries. In those
remote periods the notation of musical pieces was by far less
complete and detailed than in the last 200 years. The paucity of which the keyboard player had to
such notations not only allowed but forced musicians to improvise on a basis of little numbers,
interpret, fill in, define, and embellishto re-create the written showing the intervalic structure of the desired
skeleton of the piece, to bring it to life. harmonies, stacked under the notes of the
In the 16th-17th centuries, polyphonic compositions were bass line.
often notated without bar lines, and performers could interpret The lack of definition and scarcity of detail
their rhythm structures differently. The composers gave rather in early scores should by no means be seen as
indefinite indications, or none at all, as to what instruments they a deficiency On the contrary, this gave the
had in mind. Moreover, whether certain parts were to be played musician the freedom to choose whatever
or sung was often open to the performer's conjecture. means he had at his disposal to realizate the
Compositions of the so-called Generalbass (or figured bass) era vast potential hidden in a sketchy notation.
(17th-18th cc.) implied a harmonic accompaniment (on the This applies to Bach's works as well. The
harpsichord, the organ, the lute) very nature of his musical subjects is such
that they allow different realizations in terms
of sound production, tone-color, articulation,
etc. Indeed, on what instrument was the
"Wohltemperierte Klavier" supposed to be
played? For what instrument were "Kunst der
Fuge" or "Musikalisches Opfer" composed?
Even if a work was explicitly designed for the
organ, the organist still had to decide what
manuals and registers to use. His instrument
Btilow could be a small one-manual three-register
organ in a room or a gigantic organ with five
20 manuals and 120 registers installed in the loft
of a great cathedral.
No doubt, Bach anticipated that his works
would be performed on different instruments
and under different conditions, and it is for
this reason that he endowed his ideas with
potentials for different realizations. Along
16-18 19-20 with a wide variety of sound properties,
volumes, and timbres, they also allow a
variety of tempos.
Pedagogical goals of Bach's clavier
compositions further encourage such
variations. A beginner, an advanced student,
1617 and an accomplished pianist would play an
invention (say, the Invention in F major) in
very different tempos which would not affect
17-18 the structure of the piece. The inevitable
question 'what tempo would best fit its
character?' affords no single or simple
answer. most useful to the student, that is, in which he
Naturally, a young student, learning the text and trying to performs the given piece best. It would be
grasp the idea of an invention, a little prelude, or a minuet from wrong to see the slow, 'learning' tempo only
"Little Notebook of Anna Magdalena Bach," plays them at a as a preparation for ever faster playing. Its
calm unhurried pace. It allows him to listen into the details, to real importance, however, lies deeper: slow
develop a clear idea of the piece's structure, and it helps the tempo opens the way to a thorough
teacher to pinpoint particular problems to be worked on in the comprehension and assimilation of a piece.
Hasty attempts to play faster are harmful in
many respects. They imply that the progress
consists merely of gradual increase in speed,
and thus obliterate the pedagogical purpose of
slow tempo, the most important aspect of
studyan ever deepening grasp of the music,
of its character, structure, and logic.
Restrained tempos are important at all
stages of learning. They are highly conducive
to keeping the beats of the meter clear and
stable, to clear understanding of the melodic
material, and to treating passages and
120 ornaments as melodic phrases. It helps the
learner to imagine the themes as they could
be sung, and actually to sing or hum them.
Sometimes a fast-playing student cannot
perform the same piece at a slow pace.
Sometimes he can play both fast and slow but
experiences difficulties with a 'middle' tempo.
This is usually a sign that the work on the
piece is not complete, and that, due to an
insufficient knowledge of the piece, the
F student is unable to keep his mechanical
playing habits under control.
Learning a piece and working on it should
progress gradually through the entire range of
appropriate tempos, without sudden jumps
***
Let us return to the hypothetical example
with the Invention in F major played by three
pianists from 8 to 30 years of age. Regardless
of the obvious differences in tempos and
characters, the basic structural elements of the
piece will be identical in all three
performances. The eighths in the main motif
are played detache throughout. Its imitations
always begin on the second eighth of the bar.
Unlike the main motif (example 54 a), the
sixteenths in the counterpoint (54 b) are
played legato or, at any rate, closer connected
than the tones in the main motif. In the bars
21-23 in the right hand (and in the bars 24-25,
in the left hand) a hidden melodic line is
unveiled lightly and transparently. The
energetic character of two endingsof the I
part of the Invention (in C major) and of the
entire piece (in F major)is enhanced by the
strongly punctuated up-beat motifs (bars 9,10
and 31,32, respectively) and by staccato of
the eighths (bars 11 and 33). All these
features are totally independent of the tempos
and tone-colors each of the players may
common with music. Playing slowly is only justified if it helps happen to choose.
the student to learn the piece in all its detail, to feel its meaning Understandably, when working with a
and appreciate its beauty, to sharpen his musical instincts, and to student, a thoughtful teacher, taking into
bring him a degree of artistic satisfaction. Endless repetition of a account the student's abilities and music
bad performance never results in a good one.
Now, having recognized the absence of concrete directions
and faced with vast possibilities in the choice of tone-colors and
tempos, are we not at risk of losing ourselves in a sea of the
indeterminate? By no means! By studying a work by Bach, the
performer uncovers many objective features that dictate certain
responses on his part. Such features are rooted in Bach's musical
language itselfrich, diverse, strictly logical. Comprehending
its grammar, learning to pronounce Bach's subjects correctly, to
build a balanced exposition of a fugue, to interpret dance-like
harpsichord players, by choirs and chamber
orchestras in oratorios, cantatas, and
instrumental concertos, rather than on famous
piano performances.
Experience shows that students and mature
musicians alike often tend to play Bach's
Allegros too fast, and Adagios too slow. One
*** has to remember that Adagio should not be
8 30 F artificially stretched out and that whatever the
tempo, it must sustain the feeling of motion.
On the other hand, in Bach's time Allegros
54a were not as rash and impetuous as some
54b contemporary pianists make them sound.
21-23 24-25 Usually, an Allegro sounds rash and fitful
C because some beat in the meter slips out of
F performer's attention and passes unnoticed.
910 3132 Often, when the defect is spotted, and the
11 33 student's attention is directed to all the beats,
the playing becomes insuperably sluggish.
This only shows that in many cases the urge
to play fast goes hand in hand with rhythmic
lassitude and with the inability to maintain an
internal feeling of the rhythmic pulse. As for
skills, will try to outline for him a general character of the piece, listlessness in slow tempos, the usual
to find its natural pace and the range of appropriate tempos.
Examples set by great performers and experts of early music can
offer some useful hints and ideas, yet they should not be seen as
models to be followed or imitated.
We can deeply appreciate the way Egon Petri, Busoni's
student, played Bach, as well as Busoni's editions of Bach's Egon Petri
works which reflect his profound understanding of melodic
structures, insightful articulation, dynamic plans, and fingering.
But no student should be advised to imitate Petri's unusually fast
tempi. Similarly, the tempi are exceedingly fast in Glenn Petri Glenn Gould
Gould's truly amazing interpretations of Bach's works, as well as Samuel Feinberg
in all the 48 preludes and fugues of W.K. I and II recorded by Maria
Samuel Feinberg. In my view, the best balanced tempi in the Yudina
performances of Bach's clavier works are those established by
Maria Yudina, precisely because she interprets them not as a
virtuoso but as a musician in possession of a profound
knowledge and penetrating understanding of early music to
which her phenomenal piano technique was put to service.
In search of true tempos in Bach's music, one should focus
attention on the ways it is performed by organists and
tempos and characters, the student will be
hopelessly lost. What they fail to understand
is that 'wandering' in search of the true tempo
Allegros and character of a piece represents an
Adagio Adagio important and indispensable part of the
Allegros learning process. Without such wandering,
Allegro being guided by a single word, it is nearly
impossible to discover the music's true spirit.
3.In my opinion, the most useful way is to
bypass both
cause is that the student, being too preoccupied with observing Allegro
all the beats of the meter, fails to embrace the whole of a
melodic line behind the beats.
Punctuating beats in Allegro and consolidating melodic flow Adagio
in Adagio are not the ultimate goal. The former is but a phase in
achieving natural, effortless motion; the latter should not be
pursued at the expense of metric awareness, highly important in
playing the ornaments so plentiful in Bach's Adagios and which
often include groups of sixteenths, thirty-secondths and sixty-
fourths.
The last issue to be considered here is the three accepted ways 1
of denoting tempo and character in music: 2
1) commonly used Italian terms, 3
2) descriptions in the local language, and 1.
3) metronomic indications.
1. As mentioned earlier, Bach's clavier works, as a rule,
contain no tempo-related indications. Therefore it seems
inappropriate to describe their tempos with Italian terms which
have been developed later, in the Classic and Romantic eras, and 2.
are essentially foreign to Bach's music.
2. In recent editions of Bach's clavier pieces there has
developed a tendency toward using, in place of standard tempo gailymajesticallyexpressivesong-
indications, descriptions in the local language, such as 'gaily,' likeenergetically
'majestically/ 'expressive/ 'song-like,' 'energetically,' etc. These
can be helpful during piano lessons. Some of them are lucky
findings of an editor. However, by claiming to define the music's
contents, such descriptions often suggest the false and
dangerous idea that the character of a piece can be embraced
with a single word, and lure the student away from listening
into, and getting a deeper feel of the music itself. Partisans of
verbal descriptions argue that, without the hints at desirable
3.
both Italian tempo terms and verbal character descriptions, and
to indicate the area of desirable tempo for the given piece by the
metronome.
Whether the student and teacher accept one edition over the
other or disagree with them all, the metronomic indication can
serve as the reference point in their search. And by comparing
the tempos prescribed by different editors they will continue to
experiment with greater confidence.
The metronome allows the student to compare his tentative
tempo with those recommended by different editors, to check its
constancy over an entire piece or within its parts. This is not to
imply that the student should be permitted to play the whole VII
piece with the metronome; such practice can do more harm than
good. However, inability to obey the metronome, to coordinate
one's playing with its clicks, reveals a serious defect which has
to be corrected and ultimately eliminated.
VII
FINGERING
Fingering is one more feature almost entirely missing from 1
Bach's manuscripts. The fingering one sees in printed scores
usually belongs to their editors. It deserves attention and has to
be obeyed by the student who is supposed to know how to read 2
and understand it. This, however, represents but the initial step Reson Echo
after which it is necessary to decide: 50ab
1) to what motif or phrase the given fingering is related, and
whether it is aimed at highlighting a detail of articulation or
phrasing;
2) whether it is possible to find such free movements of the
hand without which the fingering becomes awkward and
uneasy; the piece 'Echo' by Reson can illustrate this point
(examples 50a, b):
Along with the ability to read and apply fingering, the student condition for this exercise to be successful is
must be taught to work out and write down his own fingering. a thorough and thoughtful study of the piece
The best way to do this is to supply him with a blank score, if at the piano. It will inevitably lead to
such can be found, or to instruct him to disregard the fingering observations, discoveries, and the emergence
present in one. Or else, the teacher can suggest that the student of further problems. The deeper the student
review critically and revise an editor's fingering. A crucial comprehends the piece, the more effective his
choice of fingering becomes, and the more
naturally the music flows. Thus, the fingering exercises and
experiments constitute an important, integral element in the C
process of mastering a piece.
In works for clavier of the 17th and early 18th centuries, the 42 c
fingering is sometimes characterized by certain peculiarities.
One of them is playing scale-like passages without participation
of the thumb; for instance, the fingering in an ascending passage
could be 3, 4, 3, 4, and in a descending one 3, 2, 3, 2.12 As a A
result, the playing acquires greater flexibility, and even
contemporary pianists have not neglected the device.
Special attention should be given to fingering which by itself
forces a particular phrasing. An example the beginning of the
Invention in C Major:
In the example 42 (from the same piece), the motif c is
shaped not by a caesura but by a slight accent placed on its
opening tone, which can be achieved by assigning to the first
tone of each motif the heaviest finger, the thumb.
In the following excerpts from the Prelude from the English
Suite in A Minor, the fingering is also aimed at clarifying
motivic structure of the ornamental passages:
In working out a fingering of a compact 3-part polyphonic
texture, the first thought should be given to the middle voice.
Since the upper voice is played with the right hand and the
lower one by the left, the middle voice in most cases is divided one of the three following ways:
between them, and this should be done so as to ensure that each 1) by switching fingers on the key which
hand can perform smoothly the 2-voice fragment given to it. makes a perfect legato possible;
In a 4-part polyphony the situation is different. The voices can 2) by playing one voice legato and the
be distributed in such a way that one hand plays one voice and other staccato. For instance, playing an
the other the remaining three, or each hand plays two voices. In ascending line in the right hand with the
the first case it may be difficult to connect 3-voice chords with fingering 3! \ \ \ or \ 52 \ 52 would allow to
one hand. However, even in the second case coping with two connect the tones of the upper voice.
voices with one hand is not always easy. The simplest example 3) both voices are played non legato; this
is a string of parallel sixths which can be performed in often makes a string of sixths sound smoother
than do difficult and often futile attempts to
connect the tones.
The latter can be applied to 4-, 5-, and 6-
voice textures as well. Here, too, a free and
even non legato often produces fluency which
is nearly impossible to achieve by attempts at
17 18 playing legato. However, the piano has a
device that permits motions, adjustments, and
3434 3232.12 position changes of a free hand without
breaking the continuity of sound: the right
pedal.
On the harpsichord, the player's actions aimed at linking
multivoice complexes, whatever they may be, do not affect the
character of the sound which is determined by the chosen
register and therefore remains constant. The piano, on the
contrary, is highly sensitive to the touch, and the same efforts
would destroy the easy flow and homogeneity of sound. By
assisting the hands in such efforts, the right pedal becomes, in a
sense, an extension, an augmentation of fingering, a
'superstructure' which presupposes the presence of necessary
manual skills. Therefore it makes sense to study 2- and 3-voice
polyphonic pieces without the pedal.
Later, having achieved a degree of manual dexterity, the WAYS TO STUDYING POLYPHONIC
student may be invited to use the pedal. As to 4-voice pieces, COMPOSITIONS
however, learning them without the pedal would be In a majority of Bach's polyphonic works,
counterproductive. the main musical idea appears at the very
beginning, in the first bar or few initial bars.
13
Since the entire piece consists of
development of this idea, its demands special
attention and the most thorough study. The
student must work out and polish the
presentation of the main subject at its
introduction so as to be able to cope with
1 problems and difficulties that arise in its
subsequent development.
2 This means that the initial assignment
13/14/13/14 14/15/14/15 given to the student should not include the
whole piece, not even a half of it, but be
3 limited to the main musical idea stated in the
few opening bars. The assignment should
stand until it is fulfilled to the teacher's
satisfaction. This may take several lessons but
the time and effort spent will eventually pay
off: in working with the student on the entire
piece, the teacher would not have to face the
sad necessity time and again to point at, and
correct flaws in the treatment of the musical
idea in its further development.
"The one who is unable clearly and with
full immersion to perform the theme of a
fugue is no organist/' These words of the great
French organist Charles Vidor are widely
accepted in the community of organ players.
No less important these words are to anyone
playing a Bach clavier fugue, be it a pupil or an accomplished
musician. relationship between the two appearances of
The work on a fugue must begin with a thorough study of its the subject. Unless this relationship is
subject, and can continue only after it has been understood in all recognized and expressed in the beginning,
detail, fully absorbed by the student and has become, as it were, all that follows fatally degenerates into
his own statement. A fugue is nothing but an evolving of its monotonous re-statements of the same theme.
subject, and the student has to learn about, and be able to The dialogues between the voices, which give
identify, at least the main devices and features of this process. a fugue meaning and character, are ignored.
Of course, he is aware that the second voice enters with 'the The student will grasp the question-answer
same' theme previously introduced with the first voice, that is, relationship more readily if he is asked to
'imitates' it. Very often, however, imitations are treated formally, sing the subject at its first and then second
as literal repetitions. Even though the melodic contour and the appearances, or to play alternatively the one
rhythm in proposta and risposta, the proposition and response, and sing the other, or to play them in a
may be identical or similar, what usually escapes the student's dialogue with the teacher.
attention is the expressive value of the question-answer The next step is playing a two-voice texture
and getting acquainted with the phenomenon
of countersubject. Here two items should be
brought to the student's attention:
1) the transition from the subject to the
countersubject in the first voice, and
2) the interplay between the subject in the
second voice and the countersubject in the
first one.
Sometimes the main technical problem of
performing a fugue lies in the absence of an
organization that would integrate the subject
with its continuation, the countersubject. If
the transition from the subject to
countersubject lacks unity, the performance
of an entire fugue is disorganized. The
Invention in F Major can serve as an
illustration:
Charles Vidor Until the motifs a and b are linked together
so naturally as to be played through in a
steady tempo, and the b is undisturbed by the
second voice entering with c, any further
work on the piece is useless. To understand
and control the structure of the subject, the
relationships of proposition and response, of
subject and counter-subject, of response and
countersubjectsuch are the primary
problems which must be solved before the
work on a fugue continues. Once this difficult
stage is passed, the entire exposition of a
fugue will be grasped and absorbed much more easily. This the main motif's direct and inverted versions,
preliminary experience helps the student to achieve the and its intelligent performance is hardly
desirable: to present an exposition as a rounded paragraph of possible without a clear awareness of their
speech. interplay. In the bars 3-4 and then 5-6,
After the above experiments on flexible melodic correlations, juxtapositions of the theme, in direct and
along with an analysis of the fingering and structural aspects of inverted forms, appear twice. And if the
a polyphonic piece (or even before it), the habitual student recognizes and brings out the
'demonstrations' of the theme cease to sound like a series of loud vividness of those dialogues at their initial
appearances, then he will easily handle the
similar developments in the rest of the piece.
The previous discussion by no means
implies that grasping and assimilating
structures of a fugue or an invention must
always be learned in a succession of slow
steps. The progress depends greatly on the
student's musical instincts, power of
observation, and intellectual capacity. The
1 teacher's instructions and hints which may
accompany it are but signposts on the main
2 route leading to gradual accumulation of
experience and knowledge by active and
creative listening.
F There are no general prescriptions as to
how to listen to polyphonic textures of Bach's
a b sinfonias and fugues. In the end, the decisive
b c role here belongs to thorough and methodical
preparation by working on pieces from "Little
Notebook of Anna Magdalena Bach" and on
little preludes and inventions. These easy
pieces are invaluable in acquiring an
understanding of Bach's motivic and melodic
structures, in developing rhythmic calm and
stability essential for perceptive self-
controlled performance, and in getting a taste
for orchestration on the piano which is related
to performing imitations in many ways.
shouts and turn into a flow of expressive intonations. Nonetheless, a few devices commonly used
The need to grasp and control the question-answer in teaching of a fugue or a sinfonia can be
relationships discussed earlier is no less important in regard to recommended.
dialogues between themes (and motifs) and their inversions. The 1. In a three-part piece, the upper, middle,
following fragment of the Invention in C Major can thus be and lower voices
treated as an appealing dispute between two voices uncertain as are highlighted in turn.
to which version of the motif, direct or inverted, should prevail:
The entire Sinfonia in C Major is built on juxtapositions of
C enrich the student's hearing experience and
spur his auditory imagination. At times it
makes sense to transpose an entire piece an
octave higher, as many performers of the
C 17th-18th centuries felt free to do at their
3-4 discretion. This custom, however strange it
5-6 may seem in our time, often shines a new
light on the piece by exposing its previously
unnoticed expressive potentials which can
enrich an orthodox performance.
It would be wrong to think that the devices
described above are intended only for purely
technical training. Their application, in no
way mandatory, can enliven the study of early
music with exciting experiments in solo or
ensemble music making which require
discipline, patience, and zeal. Certainly, all
this takes time, but what more justifies
.M. spending pupils' time on if not on learning!
1. 2.a
2. Out of the three voices: a) two upper voices are played with
the right hand (the middle voice partially played with the right b
hand and the rest of it by the left hand with the same fingering
as in playing with both hands); b) two lower voices should be
practiced in the same way 3.
3. One or two voices are played by the teacher, the rest by the
student. 4.
4. One of the voices is given to an instrument other than the
piano; the rest is played by the student. 5.
5. The whole piece is played with 4 hands on one or two
pianos, the bass line is doubled in the lower octave. 6.
6. Wherever appropriate, the upper voice is played with the
higher-octave doubling. Such liberties are not distortions of the
composer's concept: being wholly in the spirit of playing the
organ and harpsichord equipped with octave registers, they ta
17-18 five forgotten pieces and one hastily learned,
he will have mastered six pieces which are
thoroughly understood and worked out in
detail.
Such regimen is not at all mandatory or
exclusive. In some cases fast browsing
through a large number of pieces can be
useful, since this greatly expands the student's
musical outlook. In other cases, the student
can be given a piece which is clearly beyond
his grasp in order to test his limits or to
invoke and mobilize his latent potentials.
IX
THE SCHOOL YEAR
The teacher giving to a student a clavier piece to study, must
be sure of the student's ability to cope with it and to understand
its meaning. Otherwise the study turns into indifferent rote ta
learning. Each assignment has to be oriented toward certain new
structural elements, performance features, etc, on the condition
that the student's acquired skills and experience are sufficient for
accomplishing the task. The goal set with each new assignment
should be to bring him/her a step further. Such a methodical
step-by-step process yields the fastest results and ensures real
progress in the development of musical proficiency.
Suppose that during a school year a pupil has to learn six
Bach's pieces. To work on each of them separately, one after
another, would be unproductive. Each would take several weeks
and even that time would not be sufficient to assimilate it fully.
Better results can be achieved if the pieces are studied
concurrently or alternatively. Then each piece is actually learned
during the entire school year, which gives the student ample
time to work on its particular problems and improve details of ta
performance. At such an unhurried pace the interpretation of
each piece will mature more successfully than it would during
the few weeks of an uninterrupted struggle with it. These pieces
will not be forgotten by the year's end and they become part of
the student's active repertory. As a result, by spring, instead of