Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BUILDING
OWNER:
Kamala Timilsina
Bharatpur-12
March 2016
CERTIFICATION
This Certificate is submitted with reference to the detail structural design of multi storied
building of the following detail.
All the designs are done as per the design criteria specified in NBC 000:1994 to 114:1994,
NBC 205:2012, IS 456:2000, IS:875 and relevant other Indian design codes.
The referenced calculations were prepared by us / under our supervision and comply with all
applicable structural provisions of the Construction Codes.
We hereby certify that the design is structurally adequate and economic. However, during
construction the use of construction materials and workmanship is to be carried out under the
supervision of qualified and certified technical person.
The designer is not responsible for the violence of the specifications provided.
Analysed By : Checked By :
On behalf of :
Sahara Engineering Solution
Bharatpur-10, Chitwan
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT ON REINFORCED CONCRETE
BUILDING
CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The analysed proposed reinforced concrete framed structure consists of G+2 Storey
The structural system chosen is Moment Resisting RCC Frames. Columns and beams have
been laid out in plan in coordination with architectural and services planning that acts jointly
support and transmit to the ground those forces arising from earthquake motions, gravity and
live load. The structure is designed by carrying out the space frame analysis.
A three dimensional mathematical model of the physical structure represents the spatial
distribution of the mass and stiffness of the structure. Thus, the essential requirements for the
analytical model are the conclusion of sufficient details of geometry, material, loading and
support such that it reflects the near true behavior of the physical structure for the structural
modelling of the present building SAP 2000 V-14 software was used.
The analysed structure is found to be safe against the all the load combinations and designed
for the governing load combination. The load combinations considered for the designing of
structure using limit state method are listed in this report.
M20 grade concrete is used for different RC members of super-structure and sub structure.
The steel grade for all the structural elements is Fe415
1
2.0 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
The Design of the total structure is based on the Limit State method of design as envisaged in Nepal
National Building Codes (NBC) and Indian Standard codes of practice. Structure is designed for
Dead loads, Imposed loads (floor finishes), service loads, taking into consideration of the relevant
codes and load combination specified in the codes.
The structure is designed using individual footings under the columns designed for a safe bearing of
175KN/m2. The Strata is in general stiff clay having the above strength and is available at most of
the places at a depth of 2.0m below naturural ground level. In case such strata is not available at
this depth, foundations are taken deeper to required strata.
2
3.0 LOADINGS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS
b) Roof level
Floor Finishes = 1.00 KN/m2
b) Roof level
Live Load (accessible) = 1.50 KN/m2
Live Load (Non-accessible) = 1.00 KN/m2
c) Stair
Live Load = 3.00 KN/m2
3
Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Cd = CZIK
Where,
C = Basic seismic coefficient as per figure 8.1, NBC 105:1994
Z = Seismic zoning factor, figure 8.2
I = Importance factor for the buildings, table 8.1
K = Structural performance factor, table 8.2
The analysis & designs are done for the following load combinations using limit state method.
4
5) Comb 5 0.9 (Dead Load) + 1.25 (Eqx)
Note:
SL = Snow Load (Not Considered)
S. WT = Seismic Weight
Dead Load = Selfweight of the structure + SIDL
5
4.0 ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE
c) Roof level
Dead load = Self weight of the Slab + SIDL
= 2.750 + 1.00 = 3.75 KN/m2
Live Load (accessible) = 1.50 KN/m2
Live Load (Non-accessible) = 1.00 KN/m2
= 0.115 x 1.00 x
(considering 1000mm height) x 20 = 2.30 KN/m
For analysys of the structure,. The height of the structure is as per the approved architectural
drawings.
The total building height above ground level is 12.8 m and below ground level is considered 2.0m
6
3.200
Stair Cover
3.200
Second floor
12.8m
3.200
First floor
3.200
Ground floor
The sketches showing the model created for the analysis are shown in the following pages.
7
4.2 SKETCHES SHOWING THE MODEL
4.2.1 3D Model
8
4.2.2 Column Joint Label
9
4.2.3 Deformed Shape
10
4.2.4 Axial Force Diagram
0.00
11
4.2.5 Moment Diagram
12
5.0 DESIGN OF COLUMNS AND FOOTINGS
5.1.1 Design of Column (C1) - 79, 80, 83, 84 Ground Floor Only(From SAP)
The governing condition for the design of column and footing is the case 3
Pu = 875 KN
My = 81.42 KNm
Mz = 42.88 KNm
3
Pu = 875 x 10
fck.B.D 20 x 350 x 350
= 0.357
6
Mu 92.02 x 10
=
fck.B.D2 20 x 350 x 350 2
= 0.1073
d' 50
= = 0.14
D 350
p
= 0.081
fck
13
p = 0.081 x 20 = 1.62 %
Ac = 122500 mm2
2
Ast- req = 1.62 x 122500 = 1985 mm
100
2
Ast Provided (= 2061 mm )
Reinforcement Provided for the section is more than mimimum and less than maximum
Hence safe
2262.4 350
e-min = + = 16.2 mm
500 30
2262.4 350
e-min = + = 16.2 mm
500 30
Hence the following formula can be used for calculating load carrying capacity of the column
14
5.1.2 Design of Footing
Pu = 875 kN Mu = 92 kNm
P = 875 = 583.5 KN
1.5
M = 92 = 61 KNm
1.5
2
Footing area = 583.5 x 1.00 = 3.33 m
175
2
Providing footing size 1.89 x 1.89 m ( 3.57 m )
Size of the column 0.35 x 0.35 m
350
100
1890 x 1890
100 100
= 163.34 + 10.00
2
= 173.34 or 153.34 < S.B.C of Soil = 175 KN/m
Hence Safe
B = 1890 mm
L = 1890 mm
d = 425 - 50 - 12 - 12
2
= 357 mm
15
In Long Span Direction
2
Max. BM = 173.34 x 0.77 x 1.89
2
= 97 KNm
2
1890 x 357
= 0.60
2
Provide 14 nos. Tor - 12 ( = 1583 mm )
2
Max. BM = 173.34 x 0.77 x 1.89
2
= 97 KNm
2
1890 x 357
= 0.60
2
Provide 14 nos. Tor - 12 ( = 1583 mm )
16
Check for One Way Shear ( Transverse shear check)
1890
Critical Section is at 'd' from
face of column.
350
413
In Short Span Direction
Vu = 1.5 x 173.34 x ( 0.413
x 1.89 ) = 203.0 KN
= 9.90
1890
Critical Section is at 'd/2' from
face of column/pedestal 707
350
17
Overall Depth at critical section = 425 mm
d = 425 - 62 - 12
2
= 357 mm
B = 2 x ( 707 + 707 )
= 2828 mm
c = 1.000 x 1.12
18
5.2 DESIGN OF COLUMN AND FOOTING
The governing condition for the design of column and footing is the case 4
Pu = 600.68 KN
My = 25.78 KNm
Mz = 43.08 KNm
3
Pu 601 x 10
=
fck.B.D 20 x 300 x 300
= 0.334
6
Mu 50.21 x 10
=
fck.B.D2 20 x 300 x 300 2
= 0.0930
d' 45
= = 0.15
D 300
p
= 0.08
fck
p = 0.080 x 20 = 1.6 %
Ac = 90000 mm 2
19
2
Ast- req = 1.6 x 90000 = 1440 mm
100
2
Ast Provided (= 1608 mm )
Reinforcement Provided for the section is more than mimimum and less than maximum
Hence safe
2262.4 300
e-min = + = 14.5 mm
500 30
2262.4 300
e-min = + = 14.5 mm
500 30
Hence the following formula can be used for calculating load carrying capacity of the column
20
5.2.2 Design of Footing
Pu = 601 kN Mu = 50 kNm
P = 601 = 400.5 KN
1.5
M = 50 = 33 KNm
1.5
M = 50.21 = 33 KNm
1.5
2
Footing area = 400.5 x 1.00 = 2.29 m
175
2
Providing footing size 1.60 x 1.60 m ( 2.56 m )
Size of the column 0.30 x 0.30 m
300
100
1600 x 1600
100 100
= 156.43 + 8.99
2
= 165.42 or 147.44 < S.B.C of Soil = 175 KN/m
Hence Safe
B = 1600 mm
L = 1600 mm
d = 400 - 50 - 12 - 12
2
= 332 mm
21
In Long Span Direction
2
Max. BM = 165.42 x 0.65 x 1.60
2
= 56 KNm
2
1600 x 332
= 0.48
2
Provide 11 nos. Tor - 12 ( = 1244 mm )
2
Max. BM = 165.42 x 0.65 x 1.60
2
= 56 KNm
2
1600 x 332
= 0.48
2
Provide 11 nos. Tor - 12 ( = 1244 mm )
22
Check for One Way Shear ( Transverse shear check)
1600
Critical Section is at 'd' from
face of column.
300
318
In Short Span Direction
Vu = 1.5 x 165.42 x ( 0.318
x 1.60 ) = 126.2 KN
= 9.92
1600
Critical Section is at 'd/2' from
face of column/pedestal 632
300
23
Overall Depth at critical section = 400 mm
d = 400 - 62 - 12
2
= 332 mm
B = 2 x ( 632 + 632 )
= 2528 mm
c = 1.000 x 1.12
24
5.3 DESIGN OF COLUMN AND FOOTING
5.3.1 Design of Column (C3) - 75, 76, 77, 78, 87, 88, 89, 90 (From SAP)
The governing condition for the design of column and footing is the case 4
Pu = 413.12 KN
My = 38.30 KNm
Mz = 44.24 KNm
3
Pu 413 x 10
=
fck.B.D 20 x 300 x 300
= 0.230
6
Mu 58.52 x 10
=
fck.B.D2 20 x 300 x 300 2
= 0.1084
d' 45
= = 0.15
D 300
p
= 0.065
fck
p = 0.065 x 20 = 1.3 %
Ac = 90000 mm 2
25
2
Ast- req = 1.3 x 90000 = 1170 mm
100
2
Ast Provided (= 1257 mm )
Reinforcement Provided for the section is more than mimimum and less than maximum
Hence safe
2262.4 300
e-min = + = 14.5 mm
500 30
2262.4 300
e-min = + = 14.5 mm
500 30
Hence the following formula can be used for calculating load carrying capacity of the column
26
5.2.2 Design of Footing
Pu = 413 kN Mu = 59 kNm
P = 413 = 275.4 KN
1.5
M = 59 = 39 KNm
1.5
M = 58.52 = 39 KNm
1.5
2
Footing area = 275.4 x 1.00 = 1.57 m
175
2
Providing footing size 1.40 x 1.40 m ( 1.96 m )
Size of the column 0.30 x 0.30 m
300
100
1400 x 1400
100 100
= 140.52 + 15.64
2
= 156.16 or 124.88 < S.B.C of Soil = 175 KN/m
Hence Safe
B = 1400 mm
L = 1400 mm
d = 400 - 50 - 12 - 12
2
= 332 mm
27
In Long Span Direction
2
Max. BM = 156.16 x 0.55 x 1.40
2
= 33 KNm
2
1400 x 332
= 0.32
2
Provide 11 nos. Tor - 12 ( = 1244 mm )
2
Max. BM = 156.16 x 0.55 x 1.40
2
= 33 KNm
2
1400 x 332
= 0.32
2
Provide 11 nos. Tor - 12 ( = 1244 mm )
28
Check for One Way Shear ( Transverse shear check)
1400
Critical Section is at 'd' from
face of column.
300
218
In Short Span Direction
Vu = 1.5 x 156.16 x ( 0.218
x 1.40 ) = 71.5 KN
= 8.68
1400
Critical Section is at 'd/2' from
face of column/pedestal 632
300
29
Overall Depth at critical section = 400 mm
d = 400 - 62 - 12
2
= 332 mm
B = 2 x ( 632 + 632 )
= 2528 mm
c = 1.000 x 1.12
30
6.0 DESIGN OF FLOOR SLAB
loads
At continuous edge
2
Maximum BM, Mu = 0.0750 x 8.63 x 3.049
( In short span direction ) = 6.01 KNm
2
Maximum BM, Mu = 0.047 x 8.63 x 3.049
( In long span direction ) = 3.77 KNm
At mid span
2
Maximum BM, Mu = 0.056 x 8.63 x 3.049
( In short span direction ) = 4.49 KNm
2
Maximum BM, Mu 0.035 x 8.63 x 3.049
( In long span direction ) = 2.81 KNm
Provided d = 110 - 15 - 8 -
(for long span) 8 / 2 = 83 mm
Provided d = 110 - 15 -
(for short span) 8 / 2 = 91 mm
31
i). At Continuous edge
6
Mu 6.01 x 10
= = 0.73
b.d2 1000 x 91 2
pt = 0.248 %
6
Mu 3.77 x 10
= = 0.55
b.d2 1000 x 83 2
pt = 0.218 %
6
Mu 4.49 x 10
= = 0.54
b.d2 1000 x 91 2
pt = 0.218 %
32
b). In long span direction
6
Mu 2.81 x 10
= = 0.41
b.d2 1000 x 83 2
pt = 0.158 %
For, pt = 0.248 %
33
7.0 DESIGN OF BEAMS
X = 2 x 33 + 2 x 49
2 + 2
= 41.0
= 359.0 mm
d| = 33.0 = 0.09
d 359.0
6
Mu 64.50 x 10
= = 2.18
bd2 230 x 359.0 2
pt = 0.701 ;
X = 3 x 33 + 3 x 49
3 + 3
= 41.0 mm
34
6
Mu 96.54 x 10
= = 3.26
bd2 230 x 359.0 2
d| = 33
d| = 33 = 0.09
d 359.0
pt = 1.100 ;
Shear Design
= 68.80 KN
= 189 mm
35
7.2 Design of Beam - floor level @ Z=3.2m to Z=12.8m (Remaining Beam)
M 20
( 300 x 400 ) Fe 415
X = 2 x 33 + 1 x 49
2 + 1
= 38.3
= 361.7 mm
d| = 33.0 = 0.09
d 361.7
6
Mu 22.16 x 10
= = 0.56
bd2 300 x 361.7 2
pt = 0.369 ;
X = 2 x 33 + 2 x 49
2 + 2
= 41.0
= 359.0 mm
36
6
Mu 42.95 x 10
= = 1.11
bd2 300 x 359.0 2
d| = 33
d| = 33 = 0.09
d 359.0
pt = 0.525 ;
Shear Design
= 21.40 KN
= 609 mm
37
8. DESIGN OF STAIR
M 20
Fe 415
Tread = 260 mm
Riser = 180 mm
2
Total Load WS = 9497 N/m
2
Total Load WL = 4900 N/m
1
RB = x [ (0.5 X (WS x F12))+ ((0.5 x WL) x L1 x (L-(0.5 X L1)))]
L
= 10459.499 N
38
M max = [(RA x XA) - (WS x XA2 x 0.5)]
= 13006396 N-mm
Spacing = 131.33 mm
1000
No of Bars Required = = 8 Nos
125
2
Area of Steel Provided = 905 mm /m OK
Shear Check
V
Nominal Shear tv = = 0.13 < 0.6 Safe in Shear
bd
= 8505.1085 N
39
Depth d = Sqrt (M/(1000 x R))
= 105.8 mm ~ 106.0 mm
Spacing = 153.58 mm
1067.073
No of Bars Required = = 9 Nos
120
2
Area of Steel Provided = 1006 mm OK
40
9.0 LIST OF DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS
2). IS 456 - 2000 : Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete.
3). IS 875 - 1987 : Code of Practice for Design Loads ( other than Earth
Quake ) for Buildings and Structures.
4). IS 1893 ( Part 1) - 2002 : Code of Practice for Earth Quake resistant design of
Structures.
41
10.0 RESULT SUMMARY
Reinforcement detail
Column ID Type Size
GF to 1st floor 2nd floor
75 Square (12"x12") 4-16+4-12 4-16+4-12
76 Square (12"x12") 4-16+4-12 4-16+4-12
77 Square (12"x12") 4-16+4-12 4-16+4-12
78 Square (12"x12") 4-16+4-12 4-16+4-12
79 Square (14"x14") 4-20+4-16 4-16+4-12
80 Square (14"x14") 4-20+4-16 4-16+4-12
81 Square (12"x12") 4-16+4-16 4-16+4-16
82 Square (12"x12") 4-16+4-16 4-16+4-16
83 Square (14"x14") 4-20+4-16 4-16+4-12
84 Square (14"x14") 4-20+4-16 4-16+4-12
85 Square (12"x12") 4-16+4-16 4-16+4-16
86 Square (12"x12") 4-16+4-16 4-16+4-16
87 Square (12"x12") 4-16+4-12 4-16+4-12
88 Square (12"x12") 4-16+4-12 4-16+4-12
89 Square (12"x12") 4-16+4-12 4-16+4-12
90 Square (12"x12") 4-16+4-12 4-16+4-12
3-16+3-12 3-16+0-12
2-16+2-12 2-16+2-12
At Support At Midspan
At Z=3.2m to Z= 6.4m (Frame ID B2-B3)
2-16+2-12 2-16+1-12
2-16+1-12 2-16+1-12
At Support At Midspan
At Z=3.2m to Z=12.8m (Remaining Beam)
42
11.0 CHECKLIST FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND SPECIFICATION
43
2.5 NBC 104-1994 Wind load
Wind zone
Basic wind velocity .. m/s
2.6 NBC 105-1994 Seismic Design of Buildings in Nepal
Seismic coefficient method
Method of earthquake analysis: Model Response Spectrum method ..
.
Subsoil category II
Fundamental transactions period 0.39 sec
Basic seismic coefficient 0.08
Seismic zoning factor 0.99
Importance factor 1.00
Structural performance factor 1.00
2.7 NBC 106 : 1994 Snow load N/A
2.8 NBC 107: 1994 Provisional Recommendation on Fire Safety N/A
2.9 NBC 108: 1994 Site Consideration for Seismic Hazards
Distance from toe/beginning of
Distance from river bank
Soil type in footing Medium soil
Adopted safe bearing capacity 175 KN/m2
Type of foundation Isolated
Depth of foundation 2m
Soil test report available? Yes .. No
2.10 NBC 109 : 1994 Masonry : Unreinforced N/A
2.11 NBC 110 : 1994 Plain and Reinforced Concrete
Concrete grade M15 .. M20 M25 .. Other ..
Reinforcement Steel Grade Fe 415
Critical size of slab panel 10'0''x15'0''
Calculated short span to effective depth
33.50
ratio (L/d) for corresponding slab
Permissible L/d ratio 40
Effective depth 91 mm
Span correction factor
Tension reinforcement (Ast)Percent
Ast modification factor
Compression reinforcement
modification factor
Beam characteristics Condition of beams
Canti- Simply One side Both side
lever supported Continuous continuous
Maximum span/depth ratio 11.43
Span of corresponding beam Depth 4572 mm
of corresponding beam Width of 400 mm
corresponding beam 230 mm
Maximum slenderness ratio of column 6.5
Lateral dimension of corresponding column 350 mm
Limit State method
Design Philosophy: Working stress method ..
Ultimate strength method ..
Load Combinations:
1:
2: Mentioned in Design Sheets
3:
4:
44
2.12 NBC : 111-1994 Steel
Simple connection
Design assumption: Semi-rigid connection
Fully rigid connection
Yield Stress:
Least wall thickness
Exposed condition Pipe Webs of Composite
Standard size section
For Exposed Section
For not exposed section
Have you used Truss? Yes No
What is the critical span of purlin
Purlin size
Have you used steel post? Yes No
Slenderness ratio of the critical post
45