Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Budgeting
Project Evaluation:
Alternative Methods
0 1 2 3 4 5
-40 K 10 K 12 K 15 K 10 K 7K
0 1 2 3 (a) 4 5
Cumulative
Inflows PBP =a+(b-c)/d
= 3 + (40 - 37) / 10
= 3 + (3) / 10
= 3.3 Years
Payback Solution (#2)
0 1 2 3 4 5
-40 K 10 K 12 K 15 K 10 K 7K
-40 K -30 K -18 K -3 K 7K 14 K
PBP = 3 + ( 3K ) / 10K
Cumulative = 3.3 Years
Cash Flows Note: Take absolute value of last
negative cumulative cash flow value.
PBP Acceptance Criterion
Strengths: Weaknesses:
Easy to use and Does not account
understand for TVM
Can be used as a Does not consider
measure of cash flows beyond
liquidity the PBP
Easier to forecast Cutoff period is
ST than LT flows subjective
Net Present Value (NPV)
NPV is the present value of an
investment projects net cash flows
minus the projects initial cash
outflow.
Strengths: Weaknesses:
Accounts for TVM. May not include
Considers all managerial
cash flows. options embedded
in the project.
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
=0
IRR Solution
Interpolation
Spreadsheet: Goal Seek
Spreadsheet: IRR function
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5
CF (40.000) 10.000 12.000 15.000 10.000 7.000
PV (40.000) 8.971 9.657 10.829 6.476 4.067
NPV 0
r 11,47%
IRR 11,47%
IRR Acceptance Criterion
Strengths: Weaknesses:
Accounts for Multiple IRRs
TVM
Considers all
cash flows
Less
subjectivity
NPV & IRR Profile
10
5 IRR
NPV@13%
0
-4
0 3 6 9 12 15
Discount Rate (%)
Profitability Index (PI)
PI = $38,572 / $40,000
= .9643
Strengths: Weaknesses:
Same as NPV Same as NPV
Allows Provides only
comparison of relative profitability
different scale
projects
Evaluation Summary
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5
CF (1.065.000) 350.000 350.000 350.000 350.000 350.000
PV (1.065.000) 307.018 269.314 236.240 207.228 181.779
NPV 136.578
r 14,00%
IRR 19,22%
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5
CF (1.065.000) 350.000 350.000 350.000 350.000 350.000
PV (1.065.000) 293.581 246.257 206.562 173.265 145.335
NPV 0
r 19,22%
IRR 19,22%
Project Relationships
A. Scale of Investment
B. Cash-flow Pattern
C. Project Life
A. Scale Differences
-$1,000 $2,000
-1,000 $2,000
-1,000 $2,000
-$1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $2,000
Results: IRR = 100% NPV* = $2,238
*Higher NPV, but the same IRR. Y is Best.
Sample Problem
Eagle Air is planning a new route and
considering two alternative plane to serve it.
Plane A has expected life of 5 years, cost $100
million and produce net cash flow of $30 million
per year. Plane B has expected life of 10 years,
cost $132 million and produce net cash flow of
$25 million per year.
Eagle Air plans to serve the route for 10 years
and has cost of capital of 12%. Which plane it
should select to add more value to the company?
Sample Problem-answer
Plane A
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
CF (100) 30 30 30 30 30
(100) 30 30 30 30 30
(100) 30 30 30 30 (70) 30 30 30 30 30
PV (100) 27 24 21 19 (40) 15 14 12 11 10
NPV 12,76
IRR 15,24% 1,13
Plane B
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
CF (132) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
PV (132) 22 20 18 16 14 13 11 10 9 8
NPV 9,26
IRR 13,69% 1,07
Another Issue :Multiple IRR
50
($000s)
25
-100
0 40 80 120 160 200
Discount Rate (%)
Capital Rationing
Capital Rationing occurs when a constraint
(or budget ceiling) is placed on the total
size of capital expenditures during a
particular period.
Post-completion Audit
A formal comparison of the actual costs and
benefits of a project with original estimates.