http://www.freedom-school.com/peoples-rights-association.

pdf

The "Appearance" trap

No "Policy Enforcement" / "Revenue Collection" officer ("Police") has the power to
"Arrest" you. They can only "apprehend" and "detain" you for up to two (2) hours, during
which time they must take you before a "Court Officer" for "probable Cause" Hearing. It is
the Commissioner/ Judge/ magistrate's job to determine whether the government has
sufficient evidence to "charge" or prosecute you. It is at the "Court Officer's Office" that
the detainment is converted to an actual "Arrest".

In order to become a "Party" to a Law suit or "Case",- government must "trick" you (within
the first 48 hours after "Arrest" at the "court commissioner's"/ Justice of Peace's/ Judge's
Office) [See, Riverside vs. McLaughlin], into making "Appearance". By making
"Appearance", - you become "a party" to the case as "Defendant".

The several "tricks" are:

(1). You must give them your Name. Until YOU voluntarily state your Name, - they must
write the fictitious name "John Doe" on their papers. Even if they already know you. Even
if they have found a "Driver License" with the ALL CAPITAL LETTER fictitious name
duplicate to yours - they can not make the tie-in. They have to trick YOU into stating your
name to them, or they must trick you where:
(2.)You must agree to post a "Bail-Bond"; or
(3.)You "sign" something (Signature = "Consent to be regulated"); or
(4.)You must agree to accept an "Attorney" to "Represent" you; or
(5.)You must enter a Plea of "Not Guilty" or "Guilty"; or
(6.)You discuss, address or mention any facts about the case; or
(7.) You must say or write something (anything) favorable to your position or un-
Favorable to the Plaintiff's position, (traverse).
(8). You say or write anything admitting that there is a "case". [The presumption being - if
it is not your "case" why would you even acknowledge it?] By acknowledging that there
even is a "case", - you must be a "Party" to that case - you just made an "Appearance".

According to C.J.S. the only way to defeat being tricked into making "Appearance", is to
challenge "In Personam" jurisdiction, and NOTHING ELSE. The (geographical) physical
location "Venue" jurisdiction, and "subject matter" "In Rem" (contract in commerce)
jurisdiction of the Court, arise by "Operation of Law". (Case entry)

Returning All Papers with the "SAMPLE" "Neutral Response #1" letter removes the "In
Personam", which accomplishes - they don't get "Appearance" on you. So, you are not a
"Party" or "Defendant" - if you send all papers back with it. This is for "Defense" Mode
only.

If they "Arrest" you and "Take you in" - DON'T EVER give your name. To do so, is to
voluntarily enter into a "Contract" with the court - and You have made an "Appearance" in

http://www.peoples-rights.com/ 1
the "Case". Exercise your "Miranda" "Right to remain silent" and DON'T SIGN
ANYTHING (No Bond papers, No "Finger Print Card", No. "Photograph Card", No
"Personal effects" voucher, etc.), where they only have 48 Hours to hold you, and trick you
into "Appearance", or release you (See Riverside vs. McLaughlin- Calif.).

Also, - If they "Arrest" you - have a Friend (after the 49th Hour) serve the "Riverside vs.
McLaughlin Law Suit" on the Plaintiff "STATE OF. and District Prosecuting Attorney
and the "Keepers" at the jail (or wherever they are holding you.) They will contact their
"Lawyer" to ask about it. He will advise them to let you out, immediately, rather than face
additional damages from the "Law Suit".

When in the Court, - When they ask you a question, ANY question - Don't say Anything.
Don't give, write or say your Name. When they say, - "What's your name?" Say "I am not
'authorized' to sign anything." When they ask you a question, (such as "What's Your
Name?"), say "I don't have enough information or knowledge to form a responsive answer"
or "I Object" or "I don't Understand." (To "understand"- is to "stand" "under"; be
subordinate; be "subject" to.)

Note. If the "Judge" enters a Plea (for you) of "Not Guilty". You must ask "Is that an
"Administrative" decision or a "Judicial" Decision"? When he says "Judicial". - (or "both")
- You say "On the Record", "Thank you Your Honor, for the Acquittal that I am "Not
Guilty" and simply WALK OUT OF THE COURT. DO NOT SAY ANYTHING ELSE
TO ANYONE. SIMPLY WALK OUT.

"'If he orders the Bailiff or other "Court Officer" to apprehend you or you will be in
"Contempt Of Court", - say, "If you are Not going to honor your own 'Decision' - I hereby
serve NOTICE of Appeal" (State vs. Adams, and K-Mart Corp vs. Salmon, "Malicious
Prosecution", and "Abuse of Process".

For copy of "Brad's Kansas Law Suit/Riverside vs. McLaughlin" send $5.00, or for further
information and/or a Seminar for your "Rights Study" Group, contact:

Peoples Rights Foundation/ No tax Academy

1524 Savannah Road. CMP
Lewes, Delaware 18858-9999

http://www.peoples-rights.com/ 2
JOHN DOE

John Doe- A fictitious name frequently used to indicate a person for the purpose of
argument or illustration or in the course of enforcing a fiction in the law. The name which
was usually given to the fictitious lessee of the plaintiff in the mixed action of ejectment.
He was sometimes called "Good title." So the Romans had their fictitious personages in
law proceedings as Titus, Seius.

The name "John Doe" is and for some centuries has been used in legal proceedings as a
fictitious name to designate a party until his real name can be ascertained. State v.
Rossignol, 22 Wash.2d 19. 153 P.2d 882. 885.

When they demand "payment" of a "debt" in Court. We say, "Will you accept a
non-redeemable Note drawn on a Private Bank?" They say "No." We show a $
Federal Reserve "Note" to the Judge, and we say, "Your Honor, they just
refused "Payment" - per U.C.C. 3- 603 1 (b) Debt is discharged'. He says,
'You're right-Case Dismissed"

Statement to make before a "fiction court"

"Under"- 1.) in or to a position below or beneath something. 3.) in or into a condition of

subjection, subordination, or unconsciousness.

"Standing" - n. lb: a position from which one may assert or enforce legal rights and duties.

"Understanding" - n. 3c: a mutual agreement not formally entered into but in some degree
binding on each side. "Understanding" - adj. 1: fully apprehended.

"Apprehend" - 1a: to take hold of. 1b: arrest, seize. 3: to grasp with the understanding; be
fully aware of vi i understand, grasp.

"Fiction" - 1a: something invented by the imagination or feigned.

"Feign"-la: to represent by a false appearance of. Pretense, dissemble.

"Dissemble" 1: to hide under false appearance. 2: to put under the appearance of: simulate
- vi: to put on a false appearance, conceal facts, intentions, of feelings under some
pretense.

"Statement - before a fictitious court", "I Do Not understand as to feign or dissemble, or to

be so understood as to be fully apprehended, for to do so would be under false pretense,
therefore, I Do Not have understanding"

http://www.peoples-rights.com/ 3
SECOND STATEMENT (follow-up) if necessary. "I Do NOT understand, for I may be
beneath a position from which YOU may assert your legal rights, and may create an
agreement not formally entered into, but in some degree binding, and this may cause me to
be falsely understood, fully apprehended, and dissembled, therefore, I Do NOT have
understanding"

FICTION OF LAW
Fiction of law. An assumption or supposition of law that something which Is or may be
false Is true, or that a state of facts exists which has never really taken place. An
assumption for purposes of justice, of a fact that does not or may not exist. A rule of law
which assumes as true and will not allow to be disproved something which is false, but not
impossible. Ryan v. Motor Credit Co., 30 N.I.Eq. 531. 23 A 2d 607, 621

In their "Fiction" Court Their "discretion" is YOU LOSE - regardless how much "Proof" or
evidence of how "Right" you are.

Neutral response:

These enclosed documents were inadvertently received and opened by mistake. These
enclosed document(s), which appear to
be___________________________________________________, are not understandable,
acknowledgeable or recognizable under the penalty of False Personation must be returned.

The enclosure herein contains the aforementioned and misdirected documents; as there is
not enough knowledge or information disclosed to form a responsive answer, said
documents are being returned forthwith.

Singular response

I inadvertently received the enclosed document(s) which appear to be

____________________________________________________
I do not know what this is all about. I do not understand or recognize these document(s).
I do not have enough knowledge or information to form a responsive answer.
So I am returning these document(s),

Instructions:
Immediately Place documents to be returned in a new envelope. Immediately Address new
envelope with document sender's address, also use this address as the return address. DO
NOT use YOUR name or address on this envelope, Do not use any headings or signature
on your response. The object is to return the presentment in the most neutral, non-

http://www.peoples-rights.com/ 4
committal manner possible Immediately. Do not rebut the issue or address anything in
their documents. You simply return unwanted presentments. This is simply a misdirected
posting being returned to the sender.

Sample letter on next page:

http://www.peoples-rights.com/ 5
David S.; DeRiemer, all rights reserved address used without prejudice to rights
Care of, - 1624 Savannah Road
Lewes, Non-Domestic is in real Delaware land
Not Federal Regional District or fiction military Venue "DE")
No military fiction Venue zip Code

Court of Common Pleas Sussex County February, 26, 1998

address used without prejudice to rights
c/o, - The Circle, Court House
Georgetown,
military district fiction The "State Of Delaware"
military/martial fiction law district venue #19947

Dear Common Pleas Court Clerk,

Enclosed herewith, returned, rejected and refused for fraud are legal documents, postmarked (date) which
were delivered fraudulently "without prejudice", opened by "Mistake", and they are "Returned to Sender".
As I do not have "enough information or knowledge upon which to base a responsive answer" - it is
apparently not intended for me. As I am not a trustee/fiduciary or transfer agent, and as I am not a resident
or resident agent, it is apparently not intended for me.
As I am not "Trading As" "d.b.a." or "a.k.a." DAVID S. DERIEMER, it is apparently not intended for me.
The "Unliquidated Debt" (Res), (identified by Instrument/Document) which is the "subject-matter" of this
action, is not within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court.
I do not understand these papers.
As it is illegal for me to knowingly accept or keep mail or papers particularly legal papers, that are
fraudulently delivered - the are returned to you for fraud, fraudulent venue, and no valid Subject matter as
pertains to me a actual live flesh and blood American man.
Any mail or other (legal) papers intended for my attention may be directed as shown:
David S.; DeRiemer, all rights reserved
address used without prejudice to rights
Care of, - 1624 Savannah Road
Lewes, Non-Domestic is in real
Delaware No zip Code
Sincerely yours,
David S. DeRiemer, real natural man
not Corporate Fiction Person subject

http://www.peoples-rights.com/ 6
(Note: Serve this NOTICE on "Agencies", extortionists, Captors, Pirates; Ransomers,
"Jailers", or "police" - not on Court)

"NOTICE OF NON APPEARANCE" based upon NO UNDERSTANDING and NO

CONSENT based upon
"I did NOT "understand", - if and when I did sign anything, and you have to
prove I did understand". (See, Garrett v. Moore McCormack Co.)
"An Appearance induced by Fraud (legal coercion, physical duress, or
fictitious party) has no efficacy" (Stultz v. Stultz, 94A.2d 527, 24 N.J.Super,
354, 6 C.J.S. 18)
per Court Rule 12 (b) (1) "MOTION TO DISMISS due to lack of jurisdiction.
(Do NOT touch the issue)

"Holding or detaining beyond 48 hours without "charging" or "booking" is

unlawful" per COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE vs. McLAUGHLIN, 111 S.Ct 1661
(1991)
1. U.S. vs. IKE KOZMINSKY et al, 487 US 931, 934 (no involuntary servitude)
2. GARRETT vs. MOORE-McCORKACK Co., 317 U.S. 238 (no full
understanding = no meeting of minds = no intent)
3. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE vs. McLAUGHLIN, 111 S.Ct 1661 (1991) (No
incarceration beyond 48 hours without "charging" or "booking")
4. MIRANDA vs. ARIZONA, 384 U.S. 436 "You have the right to remain
silent (and NOT make "Appearance" by a statement) or the court will
appoint a Lawyer for you, who will make an "Appearance" for you and
grant the Court "Jurisdiction" for you.
Note: We must file with Court: 1. "OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION" (reserve
your rights - failure to object waives your rights).
2. "DEMAND TO DISMISS" due to lack of jurisdiction (no consent to use
"Code") and denial of "Due Process" therefore, due to no "consent". (per
Court Rule 12 (b) (1) MOTION TO DISMISS -no jurisdiction)
signed,
Dated: August 25, 1998
by: _________________________________________________

Accused/Detainee
real live flesh and blood Natural Man
Private Party Foreign State
Non "corporate fiction person subject"

http://www.peoples-rights.com/ 7