Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BASIC CONCEPTS
Tehnoredactare computerizat :
Lector dr. Ionela Neagu
Director editur :
Prof. dr. ing. erban Vasilescu
Adresa:
Editura Universit ii Petrol-Gaze din Ploie ti
Bd. Bucure ti 39, cod 100680
Ploie ti, Romnia
Tel. 0244-573171, Fax. 0244-575847
2
This book has grown out of the need to update the linguistic information that students in
Philology or Foreign Languages must be provided during the lectures on English
Syntax. I have taken into account the latest trends in this field, but I have tried to
introduce them gradually, always contrasting new approaches to traditional ones. That is
why learners will find issues related to Structuralist, Generative but also Minimalist
Grammar; or concepts that belong to Cognitivism and Functionalism. Theoretical
problems are thoroughly explained and exemplified all the time, followed by useful
activities that offer food for thought to the students.
I have also considered the demands that students will face during the Master Studies or
even Doctoral Schools and I hope I have managed to design an accessible course,
covering a wide range of key concepts and approaches in order to lay the foundation for
further specialised training.
The first volume focuses on the Syntax of the Simple Sentence and it will soon be
accompanied by a second volume dealing with the Syntax of the Complex Sentence and
a Workbook that will challenge students to in-depth study and discussion. I am aware
this is not an exhaustive study, but I hope you will find it an invaluable learning
resource.
The author
3
4
Chapter 1 Approaches to Syntax: past and present 7
Classical Analytical Structuralism 7
From GTG to Universal Grammar 10
The Minimalist Program 17
5
Chapter 4 Predication 75
Inside the Verb Group 75
Tense 76
Aspect 78
Modal Verbs 80
Passive Voice 83
Activo-passive constructions 85
Passive-like causative GET and HAVE 87
Negation and polarity items 89
Predication Types 95
Copulative Predication 95
Non-copulative Intransitive Predication 98
Transitive Predication 101
6
Theoretical ideas in this field are changing rapidly under the impact of new
empirical evidence. Concepts and principles regarded in this book as
fundamental have already been challenged and eliminated or substantially
revised by now.
Structuralist analysis divides the parts of speech into: form class words (Nouns,
Pronouns, Verbs, Adjectives, Adverbs) and function words (Determiners,
Conjunctions). The central assumption underpinning syntactic analysis in
traditional grammar is that phrases and sentences are built up of a series of
constituents (i.e. syntactic units), each of which belongs to a specific
grammatical category and serves a specific grammatical function.
Activity. Are phrases and constituents similar concepts? Identify the phrases
and then the constituents in the following sentence:
The little boy crossed the street in a hurry.
Are all phrases in a sentence also constituents? Are all constituents in a sentence
phrases?
7
Structuralists made use of three main methods in order to analyse complex
grammatical structures, namely: 1. Phrase analysis; 2. Immediate constituent
analysis; 3. Sentence formulas.
The syntactic level is concerned with the description of the units Phrase and
Sentence as groups of constituents round a head and with the internal phrase
structure of Noun Phrases (NP), Verb Phrases (VP), Prepositional Phrases (PP),
Adjectival Phrases (AP), Adverbial Phrases (AvP). Phrases can be subdivided
until the ultimate constituents are identified:
Further more, one can proceed to the morphological analysis of each form word
to separate inflectional or derivational morphemes from the root (stem or base).
The morphological and distributional criteria bring reliable evidence as to the
syntactic category to which a word belongs. Syntactic functions are discharged
by phrasal units generally referred to as sentence constituents: Subject, Predicate,
Complement, Object, Adverbial/Adjunct.
8
S
NP VP
Vgp NP NP
The Verb Phrase is the core of the structure realizing the function of predication.
The immediate constituents within the Verb Group must follow the logical order:
Tense, Mood and Modality, Aspect, Voice.
Activity. Identify the structure of the phrases in the following sentences and
draw tree diagrams:
1. My neighbours bought a car yesterday.
2. Mum has broken a plate.
3. The lion followed the path.
4. This smells wonderful.
5. The children are singing carols.
6. Your cousin must have missed the train.
9
!" " #$
Activity. Identify the operations that take place while turning the following
active strings into passive:
1. The children have eaten the cake.
2. Someone broke into our house yesterday.
10
Further refinement of this approach took place once Chomsky launched in 1981
the Government and Binding (GB) Model. The Government and Binding
Model assumes that grammar at large is common to all languages, making up a
Universal Grammar. The Universal Grammar represents the theory of the initial
state of the language faculty which, in Chomskyan tradition, seems to be
genetically determined and which undergoes multiple changes in a continuous
process of creative generation of structural descriptions, in order to reach the
current state, namely the grammar we use today, our I-language. Or to put it
better, our I-language (where I=1, i.e. only one language) as this language is
internal - representing human endowment, it is individual representing a
persons mind and it is also intensional covering all properties and relations
that help the speaker mould his thoughts.
Movement/ move-
S-structure
Within GTG, the binary constituent structure of the sentence (S) used to be
considered an exocentric construction, i.e. a phrase without a head or centre,
11
being based on mutual dependency relations between the Subject NP and the
Predicate VP.
The GB frame has replaced the concept of Sentence as a result of the headedness
principle, according to which all phrases are headed. Lexical categories such as
nouns, verbs, adjectives or prepositions are the heads of the phrases they
represent. A head opts for certain lexical categories to combine with in order to
form a phrase depending on the properties of that head. The lexical category
selected by a head is called complement.
Specifiers precede the head and they are not subcategorized for. For instance, the
synthetic genitive, the determiners that precede a head noun or degree words that
precede an adjective head fall into the category of specifiers.
GB tries to capture the similarities between different categories of lexical phrases
by assigning the same structure to them. The X-bar Theory is based on two rules
that cover all lexical categories:
(4) XP Specifier X
X X Complements
X - head complement(s)
12
the intermediate X projection is mother to the two nodes below it which thus
become its daughters.
The X-bar Theory can be extended to sentences and clauses in which case the
Subject NP is said to occupy the specifier position, while the sentence becomes
an Inflection Phrase whose head I covers the tense and agreement features and
the subordinate clause is a Complementizer Phrase having the Complementizer
as its head. The complementizer subcategorises for its complement which can
take the form of a finite or non-finite Inflection Phrase. For example,
complementizers that or whether subcategorise for a finite complement, while for
requires a nonfinite complement.
The Sentence comes to be described as an endocentric Inflection Phrase (IP),
having as head the functional category of Inflection (I). Inflection, the head of
the sentence, is a verbal functional category. It represents a bundle of verbal and
nominal features: tense, agreement and mood features. Inflection (I) is
considered the head of the sentence because it governs the VP and it agrees with
the Subject Deep Phrase.
NP I
N I VP (V)
N T Agr V
decorated DET N
the N
room
13
In 1928, Hjelmslev stated that the head and its dependent term can be bound
either by agreement (concord) or by government, as follows:
if they are bound by agreement, like in those pictures, the dependent term
those shows its relation of dependence on the head-noun pictures by
obvious agreement in number which is an inherent category of the head-
noun.
Activity. Provide examples to account for the following Case assignment rules
as rephrased by Black (1999: 38) in terms of government:
a. I[+fin] assigns nominative case to the NP specifier that it governs.
b. N assigns genitive case to the NP specifier that it governs.
c. V, P, C[for] assign accusative case to the NP that they govern.
The relation between two nodes part of the same constituent (as in decorated the
room) is called constituent-command / c-command, defined after Reinhart
(1976) as follows:
14
(6) c-command
c-commands iff,
a) does not dominate and
b) the first branching node dominating dominates .
Later on linguists redefined this relation (sometimes even labeling it M-
command) as reproduced below, noticing for instance that the Subject NP c-
commands any NP in the VP due to the first maximal node above it, which is the
sentence node.
(7) c-commands iff, every maximal projection dominating dominates .
The c-command relation has proved its importance when understanding anaphors
(reflexives and reciprocals) and (negative/ interrogative) polarity items. Further
details will be provided in the following chapters.
Consider the example below and pay attention also to another way of drawing the
tree diagram:
IP
NP I
Mary
I[+finite] VP
V
V NP
15
In the example above, we wonder whether the NP Mary c-commands the NP her
mother. The first requirement is fulfilled as NP Mary does not dominate NP her
mother because they belong to different branches. The first branching node
dominating NP Mary is IP which also dominates NP her mother, which proves
that NP Mary c-commands NP her mother. Another line of argument is that the
NP Mary c-commands its sister node I and all the other constituents dominated
by it.
Activity. Create your own examples according to the diagram below and identify
all c-command relations:
IP
NP I
Spec N I VP
N Compl Spec V
V Compl
16
%$ "&
The shift from GB to the Minimalist Program (MP) is motivated by the same
tension between descriptive and explanatory adequacy which has always
motivated the reshaping of generative grammar.
Any theory of language must include a lexicon which informs the speaker about
all phonological, syntactic and semantic properties of certain lexical items. The I-
language is structured or generated by means of the lexicon and a computational
system. The operations of the computational system help ensure the accurate
form of all structural descriptions (SDs) that the speaker will possibly perform.
X-bar Theory proved the phrase structure rules to be superfluous. Thus, they
were eliminated so that UG should be feasible. Within the Principles and
Parameters Approach, transformational rules become universal principles that
can be applied on any expression. Language variation is determined by the
interaction of these principles with one another. That is why, for instance,
Chomsky considers command and government as fundamental concepts that
apply throughout the modules of language (Binding theory, -Theory, Case
theory, etc.). Principles are language-invariant, whereas language-particular
features are the result of specific values ascribed to certain parameters.
17
constructions. Rather, there are just general principles that interact to form these descriptive
artifacts. (Chomsky, 1995: 26)
The new trees are considered by Chomsky as set-theoretic entities, as the Merge
operation always applies to two lexical items, and , to produce the set { , },
i.e. a single element with a more complex structure.
18
' (
$ ) ( " *$ $ ) ") +$
Minimal syntagms teach learners how to use a word correctly as they represent
the items subcategorisation frame. Notice the organisation of such a frame for
the verb to reach.
19
(1) reach
[+ V] categorial feature
[+ __NP] strict subcategorisation feature
[+ (achievement)] inherent semantic feature
[+ <[( Animate)]NP --- [(+ destination)]>] contextual semantic
features
The categorial feature specifies the syntactic category the lexical constituent
belongs to, in our case [+ V]. The strict subcategorisation feature identifies the
syntactic category of the obligatory component that the verb reach must select
in order to form a correct phrase. Thus the verb reach must always be followed
by an NP. Notice that within the strict subcategorisation frame, the syntactic
category of the constituent that can fill in the subject position is never mentioned.
The last two types of features represent the selectional restrictions of the lexical
item under study. Hence, the verb reach is an achievement verb (according to
Vendlers classification) representing the final act of an Animate subject NP
moving towards a destination. The contextual semantic features clearly resemble
and anticipate the theta grid of the verb reach that can be designed according to
the theory of semantic/thematic roles discussed in another chapter:
1
A * before a word, phrase or sentence indicates deviance.
20
The only acceptable sentence is (2e) because it is the only one which fulfills the
condition that the verb to remind requires an NP and a PP as its complements due
to its internal, lexical properties. Some of the unacceptable examples in (2) can
become correct when used in the appropriate contexts:
(3) a. It is a wonderful period of my life of which these songs [remind me].
b. Here are some pictures from the childhood of which these songs
[remind me vaguely].
External contexts can once again turn the well-formed VP in (2e) into
unacceptable ones, as in the following examples:
(4) a. *Mother wanted [remind me of my childhood].
b. Mother wanted [to remind me of my childhood].
The sentence (4a) is unacceptable because the verb want must be followed by a
long infinitive/ to-infinitive as in (4b), not by a short infinitive.
Within the phrase2, there is one obligatory element which defines it and
determines its projection into a larger phrasal constituent. In lexical terms, such
an element can be a noun, verb, adjective or preposition; in structural terms, they
are called heads. The phrase that a lexical category takes or selects is called a
complement. As explained in the previous examples, the head verb remind must
be accompanied by an NP and a PP which are its complements. Here are other
examples:
(5) remind V [ _ NP, PP[of] ]
tell V [ _ NP, NP]
depend V [ _ PP[on]]
die V[_]
2
The phrase sometimes includes other words/phrases which precede the head and which are not
subcategorized for. These are called specifiers and comprise determiners, indefinite pronouns, synthetic
genitives and degree words.
21
In addition to the complements of a head, a phrase may also contain modifiers
(or also called adjuncts) which are not selected by the verb, but provide further
information about the action denoted by the verb.
A phrase including the head with all its complements is called a minimal
phrase.
A phrase that includes both the head with its complements and the modifiers is
called a maximal phrase.
Here are some of the differences that help one identify the complements and the
modifiers in a phrase (adapted after Kim and Sells, 2007):
Modifiers of the same type of phrase can follow the verb head whereas
two complements of the same type cannot co-occur with the same verb
head:
22
(8) a. *Mary was writing a letter [to her aunt] [to her grandma].
b. Mary was writing a letter to her aunt [on Sunday] [at 8 oclock].
The examples in (8) prove that the two complements functioning as indirect
objects in (8a) cannot co-occur with the same verb head, whereas the two
modifiers functioning as adverbial phrases of time in (8b) can accompany the
same verb head.
23
In (11a) the NP the letter functions as the complement of lexical heads such as
wrote/ read/ received, but it cannot follow the verb to tell (11c) which requires
only [+ ANIMATE] complements.
% $ *$ ) % $ ,$
" % $
Taking into account that sentence (12) proved that the NP children may occur
without the definite article the, we can state that any NP needs a head-noun and
it can also be preceded by an optional determiner. In syntax, this statement can
be expressed by the following phrase-structure rule:
(14) NP (Det) N
24
The class of central determiners includes: the articles, the possessive and
demonstrative pronouns and several indefinite pronouns.
(15) (a) the book
(b) my rights
(c) no reason
Except for the ordinal and cardinal numerals that may occur together functioning
as postdeterminers as in (18 (a)), it seems that no other two determiners of the
same type may co-occur in a NP:
The table below provides examples of NPs and their morphological structure:
25
(19)
DETERMINERS HEAD
PREMODIFIERS POSTMODIFIERS
PREDET CENTRAL POSTDET NOUN
- a - - carpet -
both these - - students -
all the last fifty - pages to read
some of his first leather jackets -
each of those - famous leaders who spoke yesterday
none of your - mothers blouses -
- a whole - mile to the store
- the - - flat next door
- the - grocers (shop) -
- - - Janets husband -
- - - - court martial
Activity. Check your comprehension by adding further items into the empty slots.
Account for your choice.
Syntactically, we can represent the structure of a sentence using the so-called tree
diagrams or Phrase-markers as we have done the previous chapter.
Phrase-markers are diagrams made up by connecting a set of nodes. The lines
that connect the nodes are called branches.
On a vertical axis, the nodes in a Phrase-marker are related by dominance. We
say that one node N1 dominates another N2 if N1 is represented higher up the
tree than N2. On a horizontal axis, the nodes in a Phrase-marker are related by
precedence. We say that one node N1 precedes another N2 if N1 occurs to the
left of N2.
Basically, these are the first principles that representatives of Transformational
Syntax found important as regards the representation of phrase-structures. New
principles have followed once they adopted other approaches to Syntax.
All nodes are labeled according to the dominance relation: from the S-node (the
Sentence) which immediately dominates a NP and a VP that in turn dominate
other phrases or only lexical categories (N, V, P, etc.) represented by the terminal
nodes, namely the lexical items (the words) that make up the sentence.
26
As this subchapter is restricted to the study of NPs, lets examine the structure of
several simple and complex NPs and the way they can be represented.
(20) (a) a movie
(b) each star
NP NP
Det N Det N
a movie each star
27
(22) Michaels plane has landed.
NP or: NP
Det N NP[+poss] N
[+poss]
N[+poss] N
NP N N [+poss]
N
Michael s plane Michaels plane
NP
NP[+poss] N
Det N[+poss] AP N
AP N[+poss] A
A
A N[+poss] A
28
The NP can also be postmodified by nouns, adjectives, prepositional phrases or
even clauses. Whenever the head noun requires one of these we say that it selects
its complements.
We discuss here the case of prepositional phrases (PPs) as modifiers and
complements of the head-noun, including both the PP in the Accusative (24) and
the Analytical Genitive construction (the of-Genitive) (25).
In (24), the head-noun is books, the Determiner is the specifier and the NP that
shelf is the complement of the preposition from. The whole PP from that shelf
functions as modifier and not as noun complement fact which can be tested by
trying to insert other similar modifiers: the books from that shelf from the
bookcase.
(24) the books from that shelf
NP
Det N
N PP
P
P NP
Det N
N
29
(25) the colours of the rainbow
NP
Det N
N PP
P
P NP
Det N
N
the colours of the rainbow
In (25), colours is the head-noun, the Determiner is in specifiers position and the
possessive prepositional phrase is a complement in the NP, the sister of the head
noun.
Binding Theory
(26)
DEFINITE ARTICLE INDEFINITE ARTICLE ZERO ARTICLE
A. DEFINITE SPECIFIC A. INDEFINITE A. IMPLICIT REFERENCE
REFERENCE SPECIFIC
1. Implicit/ situational REFERENCE Eg.: Mother; Father;
reference 1. Individualizing function Sunday/ Thursday;
Eg.: Shut the window, will Eg.: They have a son and a (The) Summer was ending.
you? daughter. Measles is contagious.
the Earth, the sun (Pojarul este contagios.)
30
2. Anaphoric reference
[ ]
3. Explicit/ linguistic
reference
Eg.: He is sitting at the first
desk.
She was wearing the new
dress.
4. Cataphoric reference
[ ]
B. GENERIC B. GENERIC REFERENCE
Eg.: The road between the REFERENCE 1. Classifying function
trees is narrow. Eg.: Potatoes are vegetables.
1. Classifying function Man is mortal.
Eg.: He is a teacher.
B. GENERIC REFERENCE
1. Classifying function
Eg.: The horse is a useful C. OTHER USES
animal. C. OTHER USES
[all horses] 1. Epiphoric reference
the rich, the people, the [ ] 1. Epiphoric reference
French
Can you play the piano? Eg.: As I was passing down Eg.: There were birds in the sky,
the street, a flowerpot came flowers in the grass
C. OTHER USES down with a crash.
2. Idiomatic function
1. Deictic/ demonstrative 2. Cataphoric reference
function Eg.: at noon; at night;
(the = this, that) Eg.: a flowerpot from the arm in arm; hand in hand; by mistake;
Eg.: I could not remember it 3rd floor by chance; by heart; go to school/bed;
at the time. have lunch; at home; by bus/ train;
3. Distributive function from top to toe; on foot; on board/deck.
2. Distributive function Eg.: once a day; twice a
(the = each) month.
Eg.: This material sells at 80p
the meter. 4. Numerical function (a =
His popularity increases by one)
the day. Eg.: Ill come back in a day
or two.
3. Idiomatic function They are of an age/ of a size.
Eg.: in the morning/afternoon;
in the beginning; to throw the 5. Idiomatic function
book at someone (= to Eg.: in a hurry; as a reward;
punish); to be on the what a pity!; in a loud/ low
bus/plane. voice; What a cold day!
such a good day = so good a
day
31
However, Chomsky introduces the term anaphor restricting it to cover reflexive
and reciprocal pronouns. Whereas pronominals (personal pronouns, possessive
pronouns) cannot be found in the same NP or in the same clause with their
antecedent, anaphors have their antecedent in the same NP or minimal clause.
In a sentence like: They would often call them the pronoun them cannot be
understood as referring to the same class of individuals as the subject they.
32
The Syntactic Functions of Noun Phrases and NP Substitutes
Subject
Consider the following examples:
(28) (a) Money is useful.
(b) Both families have met.
(c) A strange noise was coming from the window.
Simple or complex NPs may function as the subject of a sentence. Notice that the
subject is assigned to the whole noun-phrase (which includes possible specifiers
and adjuncts), not only to the head-noun.
Generic Subjects may also be considered those NPs whose referents are sets or
classes of individuals due to the classifying function of the determiners that
accompany the head-noun:
(31) (a) The wolf is a dangerous animal.
(b) A lion would eat a man when hungry.
(c) Man is mortal.
33
Expletive IT and THERE can function as Subjects. Expletive IT and THERE
(from Latin: explere=to fill) are meaningless words used to fill a syntactic
vacancy. They function as Dummy subjects (meaningless subjects).
(32) (a) It is raining heavily.
(b) There are few pupils in the classroom.
(c) It is true that his father is ill.
(d) Its no use arguing with her.
(e) It was Janet who first realized the difficulty of the situation.
On the one hand, expletive IT and THERE are inserted into the subject position
whenever the subject is moved from its usual location (further details are
included in the chapter on Transformations). Notice the examples (32) (b)-(e)
where the Deep-Subject NP, i.e. the logical subject of the sentence is introduced
by it or by there because it was moved after the verb. In such cases the Subject
can be expressed by a NP (32b), a THAT-Nominal Clause (32c), a gerundial
construction (32d) or it can occur in Cleft sentences (32e). These examples also
illustrate the cataphoric function of the pronoun IT to introduce and anticipate
items of information that come later in the utterance. That is why some linguists
still name it Introductory IT making the difference between Anticipatory IT and
Emphatic IT (as in (32e)).
34
Subject Complement
The NP being assigned the role of Subject Complement or Predicative provides
information about the Subject-entity. As shown in the examples below, the
Predicative is part of a copulative predication. The Predicative is the complement
of a copula verb, such as: be, become, seem, pass and so on.
(34) (a) He is a man of honour.
(b) They seem friends.
Object
The role of Object is assigned to a complement of the verb. The NP can have the
syntactic function of Direct Object or Indirect Object.
Direct Objects (DO/Od) always occur with transitive verbs:
(35) (a) The typist has just finished the report.
35
(d) Grandmother chopped the onion.
(e) She tore up all the letters.
Understood as the transfer of an entity from its owner to a different possessor, the
Dative Construction requires an Agent in the Subject position, a ditransitive verb,
a Direct Object to encode the affected/transferred entity and an Indirect Object to
encode the final destination or the individual who benefits from the transfer.
36
As shown in the examples above, the Indirect Object is preceded by preposition
to/for when it is placed after the Direct Object. If the Indirect Object directly
follows the main verb, thereby exchanging places with the direct object, the
prepositions are deleted unless the verb requires an obligatory dative preposition.
In such cases, the Direct Object is expressed by a longer NP or even a clause:
The prepositional Indirect Object can also follow intransitive verbs in complex
intransitive predications (see further details in Chapter 4):
Object Complement
The NP functioning as Object Complement (OC/Co) must be governed by a
transitive verb, so the Direct Object NP and the Object Complement NP are sister
complements:
37
)-$ # % $
T-noun modifier
When the deletion transformation leaves a single-word ing verb or
participle as the modifier of a noun phrase, the word is shifted to a position
between the determiner and the head noun:
Det + N + modifier Det + modifier + N
38
(b) The trip was short. deletion the trip short T-noun modifier the
short trip
In order to derive APs having as head an adjective formed from a past participle,
we need initial sentences based on transitive predications with verbs in the
simple aspect:
(46) Someone sold an item. T-passive An item was sold. deletion an
item sold T-noun modifier a sold item
NP
Det N
N AP
A
A
the doctors concerned
39
Adjectival Phrases as Verb Complements
Within the Verb Phrase the Adjectival Phrase can function as the Predicative in a
copulative predication:
(48) (a) The car is broken.
(b) The ball is dirty.
The Adjectival Phrase can also function as Object Complement following the
Direct Object of a transitive verb:
(49) (a) They thought Ann asleep.
(b) Father painted the car black
$*" " % $
In (50) the Determiner is in Specifier position, while the PP of the river is the
complement in the NP. In (51) the Determiner is in Specifier position, the noun
40
head fish is followed by the PP from the river which is only a Modifier of the
head-noun. Notice in the diagram that modifiers are sisters of the N, whereas
complements are sisters of the head noun, i.e. N.
(51) the fish from the river
NP
Det N
N PP
P
N P NP
Det N
N
the fish from the river
Lszl Budai (1999: 340) identifies a few of the possible structures involving
Prepositional Phrases as Noun modifiers, namely:
NP + for + NP (indicating purpose): shelter for the poor, provision
for bleak days
NP + with + NP (possession): the boy with blue eyes, the lady with
a pink purse, a student with low self-esteem
NP + without + NP (lacking): a man without a woman, a king
without heirs
NP + in + NP (with nouns denoting articles of clothing): those
children in uniforms, those people in mourning clothes, a party in
pyjamas
41
Prepositional Phrases as Adjective Complements
Within the Verb Phrase the Prepositional Phrase can function as Subject
Complement/ Predicative in a copulative predication when the PP follows a
copula verb:
(53) (a) She is in low spirits.
(b) All goods seem of high quality.
42
(c) He works in a great company.
Adv. of Place
(d) She peeped inside out of curiosity.
Adv. of Cause/Reason
(e) They were playing computer games for fun.
Adv. of Purpose
)#$ . % $
43
As all of them are locative Adverb Phrases that describe the position of the entity
denoted by the head noun, we say that they function as modifiers or adjuncts of
the head noun and not as complements.
Activity. Make up Noun Phrases using the following adverbs as modifiers of the
head noun:
outside, ahead, back, before, underneath. Check your choice of using them as
pre- or post- modifiers with a dictionary.
Adverb Phrases can accompany any type of predication due to their optional
nature functioning as different Adverbial Modifiers.
Adverbials of Place denote the location or the direction of the event expressed by
the verb:
(58) (a) We are waiting for her here.
(b) Mark slipped the letter inside.
(c) The car was driving slowly as the dog was running behind.
(d) Try to walk backwards now!
(e) Look westwards to see the sunset!
Adverbials of Time provide details about the precise moment when the event
takes place:
(59) (a) Tomorrow we are going to the cinema.
(b) Lets see a good movie tonight!
(c) See you soon!
(d) The teacher will be here presently/ shortly.
44
(60) (a) He would often skip classes
(b) Temperatures are usually higher this time of year.
(c) People seldom have fun with their children
nowadays.
(d) Photocopy this document twice, please!
Adverbials of Manner focus on the rhythm of the action expressed by the verb,
the way in which the action is performed:
(61) (a) Margaret reads English fluently.
(b) Children were playing noisily in the park.
(c) The hunchback got quickly out of sight.
(d) Speak louder, please!
There are other Adverb Phrases having a connective function at the level of the
paragraph that help the writer make the text cohesive. Such Adverb Phrases as:
45
firstly, however, moreover, thus, hence, overall, then, anyway are said to function
as conjuncts.
(63) (a) It was chilly in the morning. The sea, however, was
nice and warm.
(b) In spite of our warning them, they will climb that
mountain anyway.
(c) Overall, its been a great party!
Unlike Adverbial Phrases functioning as adjuncts, disjuncts and conjuncts are not
integrated within the clause. They can appear initially in a declarative clause but
they cannot be contrasted with another adverbial in alternative interrogation or
negation.
Adverbial Intensifiers
46
Syntactically, at the level of an Adjectival Phrase such as extremely disappointed,
the Intensifier is placed in specifier position in the tree diagram as shown below:
Such an AP can easily be inserted within a NP, adjoined to N to modify the head
noun: an extremely disappointed clerk.
/$ . % $
The Verb Phrase must be understood as the verb plus its complements and
adjuncts that follow the main verb in a sentence.
(66) [S[NP Her great voice] [VP made Mary famous in the whole
world]].
47
Consider the following example:
(68) Sarah answered the phone.
S
NP VP
N Vgp NP
AUX MV Det N
[TENSE]
VP
V
V NP
Det N
N
noticed the mistake
We have represented only the VP within the sentence (69) He noticed the
mistake. The diagram shows a VP headed by noticed with one NP complement.
Remember: Specifiers and Complements are only functional not categorial terms.
48
Radford (1988: 232) emphasizes the need to distinguish between obligatory
Complements and optional Adjuncts when representing them in Phrase Markers
as well. He proves that within the X-bar framework Complements are sisters of
the head verb, while Adjuncts are sisters and daughters of V-bar. Lets make this
distinction referring to the following example:
(70) They tell her in the morning.
S
NP VP(V)
They V
V PP
V NP in the morning
tell her
The VP is headed by tell which selects the NP her as its sister complement,
accompanied by the PP in the morning as adjunct, sister of V and daughter of
V.
But are Auxiliaries Specifiers of VP or possible heads of VPs? The approach to
sentence as an Inflection Phrase has offered a possible solution to this issue
discussed in the following subchapter.
Van Valin and Lapolla (1997: 26) present the structure of the clause in universal
terms from a syntactico-semantic perspective suitable to account for the clause
structure in any language. They discuss the contrast between verb complements
and verb adjuncts in terms of the core of the clause (the predicate + its
arguments) and its periphery (non-arguments of the predicate). The predicate is
the nucleus of the clause. These distinctions constitute what they call the layered
structure of the clause (LSC).
49
As previous subchapters on types of phrases have also specified possible
complements and adjuncts of the Verb Phrase, we will move on to introduce the
clause as an Inflection Phrase according to the Government and Binding Model.
Learners of English become acquainted with the concept of Inflection when they
start the study of English Morphology. Derivational Morphology teaches them
word-formation by means of derivational affixes, such as prefixes, infixes,
suffixes, whereas Inflectional Morphology introduces them to a new category of
affixes that carry grammatical information. These inflectional affixes form a
closed set and they represent concrete realizations (or formatives) of
grammatical categories such as Tense, Aspect, Agreement, Case, Comparison
and so on.
Here is a synthetic presentation of the categories and the formatives that realize
them as resulted from the study of Inflectional Morphology:
50
More recent approaches to syntax have decided to use the term Inflection as a
general label which covers both Auxiliary and the system of inflections that mark
all the other grammatical categories specified above. Notice that we have
mentioned the category of Auxiliary and not the class of Auxiliary verbs, as
linguists have brought evidence in favour of the idea that auxiliary verbs
(aspectual auxiliaries BE and HAVE) are also functional categories.
Two such pieces of evidence are provided by Cornilescu in Concepts of Modern
Grammar (1996: 195), as follows:
These features prove that the English aspectual auxiliaries BE and HAVE behave
like the Inflection, so they cannot be constituents of Inflection, but only different
functional categories.
The Government and Binding Model replaces the concept of sentence as a result
of the headedness principle (i.e. all phrases are headed). The sentence comes to
be described as an endocentric inflection phrase (IP) having as head the
functional category of Inflection (I). Due to various instances of agreement or
substitution that mark the relation between the subject of a sentence and
Inflection, the subject is said to be the Specifier of Inflection.
51
Hence the representations (like (59)) based on the traditional Phrase Structure
Rules (PSRs) such as S NP ^ VP; NP (Det) ^ N and so on are now
replaced by representations (like (74)) that take into account new PSRs, namely:
(72) IP NP ^ I
I I ^ VP
NP VP
N Vgp NP
AUX MV DET N
TENSE
NP I
N I VP (V)
N V
John T Agr V NP
an N
apple
52
upon the binary branching bringing evidence from the phonological structure and
the morphological structure of natural languages. For instance, the lexeme
unjustifiable is structured starting from its root just to which the derivational
morpheme ify is attached deriving the verb justify; then another binary
branching is formed by the lexeme justify to which the suffix able is attached
deriving the adjective justifiable which in its turn is prefixed by un.
Binary branching has to be preserved also in the case of an infinitival phrase like
to leave. Consider the following examples:
(75) a. I expect [Alice must be sleeping].
b. I expect [Alice will be sleeping].
c. I expect [Alice to be sleeping].
d. I expect [Alice to have slept].
The first two Complement Clauses between square brackets have a present tense
interpretation due to the present-tense features acquired when moving into the
Inflection node. In (c) the Complement Clause has a present tense value as well,
while the bracketed Infinitival Complement Clause in (d) clearly refers to a past
event. We can paraphrase (c) and (d) as below:
53
where the T-bar constituent is the intermediate projection of a tense auxiliary (T)
that merges with a verb phrase (VP).
" $ $
In order to identify a constituent, one can make use of several tests. Here are
some of the options:
54
(79) (a) How did the boy cross the street?
(b) In a hurry.
Movement Test. If one can change the position of the string within the
same sentence, than the string is very likely to be a constituent.
(80) (a) The strike began on Monday.
(b) On Monday, the strike began. [on Monday is a constituent]
Coordination Test. If one can coordinate two strings than both strings are
constituents.
(81) (a) The manager was speaking on the phone and to his
secretary at the same time.
(b) The postman was riding and delivering the mail to each house.
Cleft Test. The string that a cleft sentence focuses upon is always a
constituent.
55
56
1 $ ) & $ $
!" 2 ! " 2 $
"$
Sentences can be analysed using phrase structure rules that allow us to represent
constituents in terms of lexical and phrasal syntactic categories, namely nouns,
verbs, adjectives, adverbs, NPs, VPs, APs, AdvPs.
Another dimension of the sentence analysis is focused upon when using the
notion of syntactic functions: Subject, Predicate, Object, Adverbial.
In the above examples one can notice how in spite of the change in syntactic
functions that took place once the sentence is turned into the Passive voice, the
57
thematic roles assigned to each constituent remain the same. Thus, the children
which is the Active Subject turns into a Prepositional Object in the passive
sentence, but it is still the Agent who perform the action. As the window changes
from an Active Direct Object into a passive Subject, it still keeps the thematic
role of Patient, suffering the action initiated by the Agent.
Bas Aarts (2008: 94) draws on the idea that an element in a sentence that does
not refer to a participant is not an argument. Among the expressions having
non-participant status, he identifies the impersonal it and existential there, as well
as all phrases or clauses that function as Adjuncts (i.e. for instance, time or
manner adverbials).
58
Each predicate displays a certain argument structure as it is shown below:
(4) cry
[1<NP>]
(5) load
[1<NP>, 2<NP>]
(6) brought
[1<NP>, 2<NP>, 3<NP>]
(7) cost
[1<NP>, 2<NP>, 3<NP>]
The argument structure identifies the arguments that the predicate takes and their
categorial status. The figures 13 show the position of each argument in the
order they appear in the sentence. The underlined argument represents the
external argument, namely those NPs functioning as the Subject of the clause.
Here is an inventory of the most cited thematic roles taken over from Fillmores
theory on Case (The Case for Case, 1968):
59
Agent: the initiator of the action acting with volition, thus
performing a deliberate act for which he may be held responsible
(8) The robber shot the clerk.
The little boy stumbled.
In certain instances, the Agent does not really intend to perform the act. We can
notice the difference between the two examples above and we can test the
presence of volition or willingness by adding adverbials of manner such as:
deliberately, willingly, intentionally:
(9) The robber deliberately shot the clerk.
*The little boy willingly stumbled.
Patient: the entity that suffers a change of state when the action is
performed:
(11) She sliced the bread carefully.
A car ran over their dog yesterday.
The bee stung the farmer on his arm.
The gardener mowed the grass.
David has got bitten by an angry dog.
Blake (1994: 68) argues that the role Patient covers all of the following situations
(for which we provide further examples below), thus including what other
linguists call Theme (b):
60
(a) an entity viewed as existing in a state or undergoing change
(12) This theory is clearly obsolete.
The bomb blew the tower up.
(b) an entity viewed as located or moving
(13) The baby is sleeping in the pram.
The competitors have dived into the water.
61
The Moores have sent for the doctor.
Stimulus
(21) Their criticism stung him.
He amazed everybody with his intelligence.
Recipient
(22) The student has got a last warning.
The trainer always gets the blame for whatever goes wrong.
Starting from the assumption that a head may directly -mark only one sister NP,
Cornilescu (1996: 180) notices that only verbs and prepositions may occur with
sister NPs which they assign -roles directly, whereas As and Ns relate to NPs
only by means of prepositions, so they indirectly -mark the respective NPs.
Consider the following examples:
(23) [NP Your friends] [VP have missed [NP the train]].
Within the VP, the NP the train gets Accusative case marking, being assigned the
syntactic function of DO and the -role of Theme.
62
The letter is from Italy.
Source
The cat is under the table.
Location
Due to their full meaning, the above prepositions directly assign the appropriate
thematic roles to the governed NPs. However, the role can be jointly assigned by
the verb and the preposition:
(25) The police will look into the matter.
She dived into the swimming-pool.
63
respect the authorities respect for authorities
revise a report the revision of/ to a report
All the above examples prove the defective nature of nouns as -markers.
Grimshaw (1990) suggests that the theta-grid represents the prominence relations
among arguments. She adopts the following thematic hierarchy noticing that
syntactic relations are not established only according to this hierarchy of thematic
roles but also according to the aspectual properties (Vendlers: activities,
accomplishments, achievements, states) of the predicate.
(28) Thematic Hierarchy
(Agent(Experiencer(Goal/Source/Location(Theme)))))
She claims that arguments are -marked from the least prominent to the most
prominent, as the least prominent roles are the most dependent on the verb for
their interpretation.
Jackendoff (1990: 258) proposes another Thematic Hierarchy based on the
principle of ordering the -marked arguments from the least embedded to the
most deeply embedded, from left to right, as follows:
(29) 1. Actor
2. Patient or Beneficiary
3. Theme
4. Location, Source, Goal
Instrumental Prepositional Phrases are not included as they are always adjuncts.
The role of Agent is always related to Actor or to Patient.
64
In spite of linguists different views on thematic hierarchies, they all agree that
each argument of a predicate can be assigned a thematic role. By including the
thematic roles of the verbs arguments within the argument structures, we make
up the thematic structure of the predicate.
Here are a few examples based on the sentences ((4)-(7)) discussed in the
beginning of this chapter:
(30) cry
[1<NP, Experiencer>]
(31) load
[1<NP, Agent>, 2<NP, Patient>]
(32) brought
[1<NP, Agent/Source>, 2<NP, Benefactive/Goal>, 3<NP, Theme>]
(33) cost
[1<NP,Stimulus>, 2<NP,Patient/Experiencer>, 3<NP, Instrument>]
In this way thematic grids do not represent only sets of thematic roles, but they
also encode syntactic information about the coding of these roles.
Activity. Discuss the influence of the thematic hierarchy and of the aspectual
properties of verbs in assigning -roles in the following examples:
1a. Hes been writing a novel for 2 years.
1b. He wrote a novel last year.
2a. Hes been climbing the mountain for an hour.
2b. He reached the top.
3a. He swam to the buoy.
65
3b. He is swimming to the buoy.
4a. The plane has just landed in Atlanta.
4b. The plane has flown to Atlanta.
5a. They look up to their manager.
5b. The young lady looked down on the maid.
6a. Tears blurred her eyes.
6b. The writing blurred and danced before his eyes.
" "
The lexicon and syntax are not considered separate units in this approach to
Grammar. As Goldberg (1995: 19) states:
() syntactic frames are directly associated with semantics, independently of the verbs
which may occur in them. [] To a large extent, verb meaning remains constant across
constructions; differences in the meaning of full expressions are in large part
attributable directly to the different constructions involved.
66
Ditransitive Constructions
The next three examples (b)-(d) are metaphorical instances of the Dative
Construction. Although the meaning of the verb remains the same, the three
sentences have different meanings due to the construction as a whole: the Indirect
67
Object NPs are obviously affected by the action expressed by the verb, they
become Patients subjected to certain changes by a certain Causer.
Caused-Motion Constructions
Goldberg brings evidence in favour of the idea that there are complex transitive
constructions of the form (SVOObl) (where V is a nonstative verb; Obl is a
directional Preposition Phrase) which can be interpreted as X CAUSES Y TO
MOVE Z although the lexical items involved do not inherently encode this
meaning.
Here are further examples we have found suitable to account for her theory:
(35) (a) The audience clapped the speaker out of the conference hall.
S/Cause DO/Theme OC/ Path
(b) The animals scared the thieves out of the house.
S/Cause DO/Theme OC/ Path
(c) He smuggled a gun into the prison.
S/Cause DO/Theme OC/Path
Compare also:
(36) (a) She piled old articles of furniture onto the balcony.
(b) She piled the balcony with old articles of furniture.
In the first sentence, the Direct Object NP old articles of furniture is assigned the
thematic role of Theme as the entity denoted by the NP changes its location
being moved to the balcony. Thus the Adverbial of Place onto the balcony is
assigned the role of Path. In the second example, the NP the balcony is a Direct
Object totally affected by the action performed, thus the NP carries the theta-role
Patient, while the Prepositional Phrase with old articles of furniture is only the
Instrument that helps the Agent fulfill the action.
68
Related interpretations of such constructions:
X talks Y to move Z with transitive verbs that basically involve a
communicative act, such as: order, ask, urge, invite, send
(37) (a) The judge sent him to jail.
(b) The emperor ordered his daughter out of his empire.
Resultative Constructions
69
the Object Complement as an Adjectival Phrase where the adjective must
denote the end point of a scale:
(41) (a) The prince set her free.
(b) The cook boiled the eggs hard.
(c) The cat licked the plate clean.
The semantics of the Way Construction implies an Agent who directs his motion
along a difficult Path by certain means used to remove the encountered obstacles.
Syntactically, it is structured as illustrated by the following example:
(44) The ambulance hooted its way out of the traffic jam.
The NP the ambulance functions as Subject, the verb hooted behaves like a
transitive verb here being followed by the NP its way functioning as Direct
Object. As regards the Prepositional Phrase out of the traffic jam we cannot state
yet whether it is a complement of the verb or a modifier of the NP way.
It is argued that the Prepositional phrase is a sister of the verb, rather than a
modifier of the NP way as an adverb may be introduced between the two
complements. The example belongs to Jackendoff (1990a: 212):
70
(45) Bill belched his way noisily out of the restaurant.
He was whistling his way to the park obviously means here: He was walking and
whistling at the same time.
(47) (a) Connie tricked her way past the security guards into the club.
S/Theme DO/Path Adv.of place/Path Adv.of place/Goal
(b) He conned his way into the job using false diplomas.
S/Theme DO/Path Adv.of place/Goal Adv.of manner/Instrument
71
Goldbergs work represents an interesting approach to argument structure
proving once more the intertwining of Syntax with Semantics and Pragmatics.
V PP
V NP P
DET N P NP
DET N
read the newspaper in the morning
72
Chomsky furthermore argues that if is a lexical constituent and not a
grammatical formative or inflection, it means that the head L-marks its sister
complement:
(51) L-marking
L-marks , iff is lexical and -governs .
The principle is helpful in that on the one hand, it identifies the argument of the
predicate which will be assigned a thematic role; on the other hand, the principle
helped Chomsky refine the definition of the notion of barrier as a maximal
projection which is not L-marked.
On the basis of such evidence, we find at Cornilescu (1996: 185) the Condition
on Extraction Domains:
73
74
4 PREDICATION
)$ %$ /$ . " *
As we have already mentioned in the first chapters, the order of Auxiliaries in the
Verb Group is as follows:
(1)
1. Tense / Modal + infinitive
2. Perfective: [have + -en]
3. Progressive: [be + -ing]
4. Passive: [be + -en]
Activity. Analyse the structure of the Verb group in the following sentences:
a. She is wasting her time.
b. Tim has broken the window.
c. Mary will have graduated by 2012.
d. The mistakes must have been identified very quickly.
e. It might be snowing in Italy.
75
Tense
Hans Reichenbachs (1947) tense theory is based upon three basic entities:
speech time (ST), reference time (RT) and event time (ET). Speech time is
always now. At the moment of utterance (ST) the speaker realizes, recalls or
predicts an event. The time at which the event occurred (ET) can be simultaneous
(ov.=overlap) or it may precede (bf.=before) or follow (af.=after) the time of
reference (RT) marked on the axis of orientation (present, past, future).
The diagram below represents our informal perspective on the English tenses
of the Indicative as they can be represented on the axes of orientation. Remember
that all Tenses are both Simple and Progressive.
FUTURE FUTURE
FUTURE PERFECT TENSE
IN THE PAST
PRESENT
TENSE
PRESENT
PERFECT
PAST
TENSE
PAST
PERFECT
76
Here are several examples of abstract temporal interpretations of the tense
forms in English. Notice how the different values assigned to each tense, on the
one hand, and the aspectual variations, on the other, may or may not lead to
changes in the relationship between ST, RT and ET.
(5)
a.Twelve divided by four is three.
ST ov RT ov ET = present
b.The birds are singing in the tree.
Even though the temporal representation is the same the two sentences differ
in terms of structural realization: 5a uses Present Simple to express general,
scientific truths, whereas 5b uses Present Continuous to express a momentary
action in progress.
(6)
a. David is buying a car next week.
RT af ST
RT ov ET = future
b. The train leaves at 10 a.m.
The above examples are two instances of Present Tense used with future
reference, however, whereas the Present Simple points to future actions as part of
a scheduled programme, the Present Progressive expresses future events in the
speakers personal plan.
(7)
a. Jack has already moved in.
RT ov ST = present
ET bf RT, already
b. Jack moved in yesterday.
77
RT bf ST
ET ov RT = past, yesterday
Notice how the Present Perfect Simple accounts for a recently fulfilled event,
while the Past Simple denotes an action finished in a definite past moment.
(8)
a. The soldier lived in Germany for 2 months (during the war).
RT bf ST
ET ov RT = past
b. The soldier has lived in Germany for 2 months.
RT ov ST = present
ET bf RT
Besides the difference noticed in the RT (past in 8a vs present in 8b), the two
verb structures include the time adverbial for 2 months which helps us make the
distinction between an open (until present) and a closed (past) period of time.
More precisely, the Present Perfect will always express an event that lasts up to
the moment of speech (ST=now).
Aspect
However, when dealing with predication we must take into account the semantic
features relevant for aspectual distinctions summarized in the table below:
78
Table. Aspectual features and types of predications
[-DURATIVE] [+DURATIVE]
MOMENTARY Limited duration Unlimited duration
PREDICATIONS EVENT PREDICATIONS STATE
The actions are perfected PREDICATIONS
almost at the same time they
are performed
[- DEFINITE]
He kicks and slams the door
recategorized . He is kicking the ball.
My head hurts!
Watch out, you are hurting me! recategorized
In 1976, Co eriu develops the concept of phase verbs as a means to express the
transition from one state into another, some change in the state of affairs. Thus he
distinguishes the following phases of an event: imminent/ ingressive, inceptive,
progressive, continuative, regressive, conclusive and egressive.
In English such aspectual distinctions can be either grammaticalized whenever a
verb is used in a certain Tense or lexicalized whenever certain verbs exhibit such
values in their inherent meaning. For example, Continuous Tenses express the
Imperfective Aspect of events, while in order to express the beginning of an
event we can use ingressive verbs such as begin or start. To emphasize the
79
duration of the event we can use durative or continuative verbs, such as resume
or continue. In order to focus on the end of the event, to express the conclusive
aspect, we can use egressive verbs such as stop or finish.
Many of these phase verbs behave like ergative verbs, making the transition from
their transitive form into an intransitive one without passivization:
Modal Verbs
The above discussions illustrate the fact that the form of the main verb is
determined by the auxiliary that precedes it. This means that auxiliary verbs
subcategorize for VPs.
Consider the following two examples and their tree diagrams:
(10) John has bought a car.
IP
NP I
Spec N I[+present] VP
[+ PERF]
_ N has V
John V NP
bought Spec N
N
a car
80
The perfective auxiliary subcategorises for a VP headed by a participle (bought a
car), just as in the following example the modal auxiliary subcategorises for a
VP headed by a verb in the bare infinitive form (can not have missed the train).
IP
NP I
cousin not V VP
have V
V NP
missed Spec. N
N
the train
Remember that in semantics, the English modal system is divided into deontic
and epistemic. On the one hand, there are differences in meaning between the
two types, namely: the deontic modals communicate types of social information
such as permission, obligation, moral duty etc., while the epistemic modals
express different degrees of prediction (possibility, probability, certainty) as
regards the speakers knowledge about the world.
81
Activity. Identify the deontic and epistemic meanings of the modal verbs in the
following sentences:
a. He was angry and he would not go.
b. This experience must have taught him a lesson.
c. John may be walking in the park.
There are structural differences as well. Deontic modals take only [+ ANIMATE]
subjects, while epistemic modals allow both personal and impersonal subjects.
(12) You must drive carefully.
(13) It must be raining in London.
In the first example, the modal verb must has a deontic value expressing the
obligation of a [+ ANIMATE] subject to perform an action in a certain way. In
the second example, the modal verb must has an epistemic meaning, expressing
certainty as concerns an impersonal [- ANIMATE] subject, i.e. a natural
phenomenon which is taking place in London at the moment of speech.
Past time reference is realized by Past Tense forms or substitutes in the case of
deontic modals, while epistemic modals are followed by perfect infinitive forms
of the main verb in order to refer to past events.
(14) Alice would play the piano when she was young.
That would have been in 1878.
82
Activity. Illustrate the structural differences of CAN, MAY, MUST and WILL in
their deontic and epistemic meanings.
Passive Voice
(15)
a. movement applied on the active Subject = Subject Postposing/Demotion
b. movement applied on the active Object to fill the empty Subject position =
Object Preposing/Promotion
c. insertion of aux. BE and attachment of en to V;
d. insertion of the agentive preposition by in front of the newly formed
Object;
e. optional deletion of the Object of Agent.
83
According to the Government and Binding Principles, movement can occur only
in empty slots and in positions that will preserve the tree structure. For example,
a head can move only to an empty head position; a wh-phrase can move to a
specifier or non-argument position. Nothing can be moved to a Complement
position, since Complement positions are subcategorized for and filled at Deep-
structure level.
IP
NPk I
Spec N I[+past] VP
play V VP[+pass]
ti V
V PP
V[+pass] NP P
praised tk P NP
by Spec N
all N
critics
84
Radford (2003: 134) notices the resemblance between passive predicates and
unaccusatives in that they allow expletive structures such as: There was found no
evidence of any corruption. He supports the claim that the passive Subject
initially originates as the complement of the main verb receiving the thematic
role the verb assigns it and then moves to the specifier position as the preverbal
Subject of the passive construction: No evidence of any corruption was found.
Such an account would explain how a phrase functioning as Patient ends up in
Subject position, while its canonical position is after the main verb.
Activo-passive constructions
Ergative Verbs
Notice how ergative verbs allow us to move NPs functioning as DOs (the
concert, the ice) into Subject positions without passivization. However these
structures resemble Agentless passives inasmuch as the NPs functioning as
Subjects (the conductor, the sun) that have been assigned the thematic role of
Agent in the D-structure are deleted in the S-structure, i.e. in the ergative
construction.
85
As regards their meaning, ergative verbs express all kinds of changes suffered by
certain Patients, some of them related to movement, some others to culinary
processes, as exemplified below:
(19) The child cracked the mirror with a toy. / The mirror cracked.
The storm sank the ship. / The ship sank.
The captain sailed the boat. / The boat sailed.
The player spun the ball. / The ball spun.
The cook filled the doughnuts with cream. / Her eyes filled with tears.
Mother cooled the soup for the baby. / The soup cooled.
Middle constructions
Middle constructions are also considered activo-passive structures just like the
ergative verbs. Among the differences that must be identified between the two
categories we start by mentioning the fact that middle constructions always
require an affected Subject NP, an intransitive verb which has a transitive
counterpart and an Adverbial Modifier. Here are a few examples:
The above examples show us that the event or process expressed by the verb
affects the entity in the Subject position which most of the times is the Patient of
the action (as in (20) (a)-(d)), but it can be both the Patient and the Agent of the
86
action (as in (20) (e) and (f)) depending on the reading assigned to the verbs
semantics.
For a detailed discussion of the syntax of the middle constructions as compared
to the passive, the active and the ergative structures, see Viorica Lifari (2007).
The causative auxiliaries enter two types of structure. The Active patterns
(21) GET + NP (somebody) + long infinitive
HAVE + NP (somebody) + short infinitive
The examples show that the entities denoted by the Subject NPs are in charge of
the actions, though they do not really perform it; they rather benefit from it.
These NPs are assigned the Benefactive theta-role. The real Agents are the DO-
NPs: my cousin, the maid, his secretary, your driver.
87
In (24) the Subject NPs carry the thematic roles of Benefactive, while the Agents
are represented by the Prepositional Phrases in the end of the sentences. The
difference in meaning between (24) and (25) is thus pointed out at the level of
thematic roles.
(25) The Simpsons had their office broken into.
Hes never got his wallet stolen.
The wounded got the shot made by the nurse.
The GET Passive better expresses a detrimental meaning. In (25) the first two
Subject NPs are assigned the Experiencer theta-role, while the DO-NPs their
office and his wallet represent the Patients. In the last example, the Subject NP is
Patient because the entity suffers the action, the DO-NP the shot is the
Instrument, and the PO-NP the nurse represents the Agent.
Our analysis has been made in terms of Subject-NPs and Direct Object NPs
trying to emphasize the transitivity of the main verbs. However, when analyzing
complex sentences such as We had the maid clean the windows yesterday we
must deal with Main Clauses and Embedded Clauses, as follows:
88
Negation and polarity items
Local negation has scope over a lexeme or a phrase, while sentential negation
extends to the entire sentence.
In order to be considered negative, a sentence must express the opposite truth
value of its Affirmative counterpart.
(28) We redecorated our house last week.
We didnt redecorate our house last week.
If the first sentence is true, the second is false. If the first sentence is false, then
the second is true.
Whenever individual lexemes are attached negative derivational morphemes
(prefixes or suffixes) there is an instance of local negation:
(29) He was driving carelessly.
Your information is inaccurate.
89
Unlike never or not which overtly express negation, there are lexemes evincing
an inherent negative meaning:
(30) to deny/ refute = not to admit
to refuse/ reject = not to accept
to doubt = not to believe/trust
to lack = not to have/own
to miss = not to catch
to prohibit = not to allow
to fail = not to succeed
(31) Hardly had he dialed the number when Thomas entered the door.
Little did he know what his decision would lead to.
Klima (1964) assigns the Negator to the pre-sentential position, from where it is
later moved and incorporated into Auxiliary or indefinites.
In 1972, Lasniks conclusion of his study is that Neg actually appears in Comp
position.
Later on, Pollock (1989) suggests the Split IP Hypothesis according to which
functional elements (Tense, Agreement, Negation) serve as heads of their own
phrasal category. Thus negation is represented as the head of a NEG Phrase.
90
(32) He did not hear the bell.
CP
C TP
PRN T
He T NEGP
did ADV NEG
not NEG VP
Spec V
V NP
hear
the bell
Our aim is not to bring evidence in favour or against these theories; at least not in
this book. We are going to restrict our attention to readily identifiable licensers
with relatively clear positions at LF.
Our approach will be as follows: an overt negator like NOT is placed in the
Specifier position of the VP, being c-commanded by I and c-commanding all
items dominated by its sister-complement V, including all those negative
polarity items whose uses it licenses.
91
IP
NP I
brother not V NP
read Spec N
any N
poems
Polarity items are those lexemes or phrases that due to their inherent meaning or
collocational instances strictly require either an affirmative or a negative context.
Thus, we must distinguish between Affirmative Polarity Items (APIs) and
Negative Polarity Items (NPIs). APIs occur only in the scope of some affirmative
elements, while NPIs select a negative environment.
Polarity items range from grammatical formatives (some, any, ever, until, yet,
either, little, unless, lest) or lexical items (to bother, to budge, to fathom, to
flinch, to mind) to idiomatic constructions (to bat an eye, to hurt a flea, to give a
damn, in weeks, in donkeys years etc.).
(34) Troubles never come singly.
No pain, no gains.
They dont give two pins for that.
According to Quirk (1972) all sentential environments which require or allow the
use of Negative Polarity Items are [- assertive]. In fact, a sentence is
grammatically correct only if its assertivity corresponds to the [ assertive]
inherent feature of the polarity items. (Suggested reading on Polarity Reversal
Rule in Cornilescu, 1982: 15-18, 32-34)
92
(35) Youd better leave now. [+ assertive] inherent marking;
[+ assertive] derivational marking
Activity. Identify the negative polarity idioms. Use them in negative clauses to
see if their [ assertive] inherent marking matches the derivational, sentential
assertivity.
a fat chance; in the least; bat an eyelid; bark up the wrong tree; be all ears
A weak Epistemic meaning like possibility turns into a strong negative meaning,
namely impossibility, which conveys the speakers higher degree of certainty:
93
Beside semantic oppositions, Negative Polarity Items indicate certain syntactic
structures. For instance, it was proved (Ladusaw, 1980; Sailer, 1995) that NPIs
occur only in the scope of monotone decreasing operators.
In the example above, the downward monotone quantifier few of licenses the use
of NPI ever.
94
$) " *$
"* #$ $) "
95
The predicative can be a Noun Phrase, an Adjectival Phrase, a Prepositional
Phrase or a Complementizer Phrase (clausal constituent, finite/non-finite).
Provide examples of each type. Traditionalists often label this function as
Subject Complement.
Despite the distinct syntactic and semantic features of the types of BE, they all
share the same behavioural features, namely:
(42)
BE does not require do-inversion except for the negative imperatives
(Dont be so cruel!)
In interrogative sentences it undergoes inversion with the subject: Is Mary
at home?
The negation is inserted after BE: The pupil is not writing!
All types of Be can be deleted in contexts like relative clauses: The man
(who is) ringing at the door
All types of Be can undergo there-insertion except for the copula BE:
There are no children in the garden.
Only the existential BE assigns thematic roles to its neighbours:
She is at school. BE <theme, location>
96
2. the Equative Type: A is B and consequently B is A; A is the identified ; B is
the identifier.
(44) He is the Prime Minister of France./ My deskmate is the smartest child in
the classroom.
Activity. Distinguish between the attributive and the equative type in the
following sentences:
1. His behaviour was above reproach.
2. The weather has turned cold and windy.
3. Dmitrii Anatolevich Medevedev became Russias president on 2nd March
2008.
4. Margaret Thatcher was the United Kingdoms first female Prime-Minister in
1979.
(45) Martin and Denise are married. / The women and children were
separated from the men. / Grammar is similar to Mathematics.
97
" 4 "* #$ #$ $) "
Simple Intransitives
Unaccusative predicates are verbs that do not assign accusative case to the
complements that follow them. This feature distinguishes them from the
transitive verbs. Moreover, whereas in a transitive construction both the Subject
and the Complement are assigned thematic roles, unaccusative structures have a
non-thematic there subject, which is not a theta-marked argument of the verb
but a purely expletive one. Here are some examples:
The Subject NPs anticipated by there have the thematic role of Theme.
Generative Grammar explains the structure by analyzing the two transformations
that take place, namely: movement of Subject NP into the VP right after the main
98
verb and then insertion of the expletive there in the position left empty by the
moved Subject.
Activity. Try to explain the required inversion between verb and Subject NP
after expletive there in terms of Movement within the frame of Government
and Binding Syntax.
Unergative verbs differ from the unaccusatives in that their Subject NPs carry
the thematic role of Agent and they never follow the verb.
Another structural difference noticeable from the examples above is that unlike
unergative verbs, the unaccusatives cannot be used in the Progressive aspect.
99
They have fallen behind with their instalments.
Vintr. + IO + PO
(55) The manager talked to the employees about the crisis.
They signaled to the waiter for another beer.
Criminals would pray to God for mercy.
100
6. Reciprocal intransitive verbs:
(57) The dates of the two conferences have overlapped.
Their parents divorced two years ago.
None of these glasses match.
Basically a transitive verb can become intransitive when it gives up on its Direct
Object. This can take place by means of two important processes:
1. DELETION of the Direct Object:
(58) In order to get on time to work she has to drive (her car) each and every
morning.
2. DELETION of the reflexive Direct Object
3. PROMOTION of the Direct Object in Subject position:
(59) The book sold well.
#$ $) "
All transitives share the feature [_ NP]. This NP occupies the Complement
position, being governed by the transitive verb. The verb governor assigns
Accusative case to its governee.
(60) You must send the letter today.
Mother is baking a cake.
He always makes me laugh.
Simple Transitives
101
verbs or better ditransitive complementation which includes those transitive
verbs that take two arguments functioning as DOs (The teachers have asked him
a lot of questions./ This car cost him a lot of money.) or one having the function
of DO and the other of IO (His father handed him the keys yesterday./ A clown
has given us the tickets.).
Pinker (1989) suggests that productive use of the ditransitive syntax is the result of a
lexicosemantic rule which takes as input a verb with the semantics X CAUSES Y TO GO TO
Z and produces the semantic structure X CAUSES Z TO HAVE Y. The double object syntax,
he argues, is then predictable from near-universal linking rules mapping the arguments of a verb
with the meaning X CAUSES Z TO HAVE Y into the ditransitive form. (Goldberg, 1995: 8)
The underlined NPs functioning as DOs are obviously affected by the action
denoted by the transitive verb. In the examples above the DOs are assigned the
thematic role of Patient. However there are verbs that denote actions performed
to the benefit of their arguments, as in:
102
2. Monotransitive verbs with effected/resultative DO:
(66) to sleep the sleep of the just, to dance the last dance, to laugh a bitter
laugh, to fight a battle
103
6. Monotransitive verbs with Locative DO:
8. Relational verbs:
a. reciprocal verbs which express symmetric relations between the subject and
the DO:
(70) She resembles her father.
These trousers dont fit me at all.
This frame perfectly matches your photo.
b. verbs of possession:
(71) The architect owned two flats in Germany.
He evinced a strong desire to win the competition.
She possessed that kind of self confidence that nobody could defeat her.
104
By midnight she had covered half of the subjects for the
exam.
The university board comprises teachers and students as well.
9. Causative verbs
a. periphrastic causatives:
(73) I had my car repaired yesterday.
The heat will make the windows steam up.
They havent found out what caused the accident.
c. morphological causatives are transitive verbs that have been derived from
other lexical items by means of word-formation processes, such as:
- conversion:
(75) He has never feared the unknown.
The collector has faked the signature on the painting.
His friends could never fault his honesty.
She ironed the folds of her skirt carefully.
The lady suddenly faced the man who was following her.
105
- affixation:
(76) The Town Hall decided to widen the main avenues.
The farmer tightened the rope around the horses legs.
There are also some transitive verbs that have developed a causative meaning, as
in:
(79) Grandparents would forgive him anything.
Victory would earn them a semi-final place against Surrey or Kent
tomorrow. (British National Corpus)
f. ergative verbs are verbs that can function either as transitive or as intransitive
without any change in form and without passivization (to sink, to float, to dry, to
ring, to break):
(80)
Vtransitive Vintransitive
The sun faded the T-shirt. The T-shirt faded in the sun.
She dropped her voice dramatically. Her voice dropped (in a whisper).
The heat steamed his glasses up. His glasses steamed up.
106
10. Lexically complex transitive verbs are phrasal verbs (verb + particle)
followed by a direct object. The whole verb phrase can be subjected to particle
movement or not. The particle must accompany the verb or it may move after the
direct object sometimes changing the meaning of the VP. For instance,
considering the verb to run, one can notice that in the phrase run into somebody
with the meaning meet sb. by chance no particle movement is allowed, whereas
to knock sth. and kill it can be expressed either by run sth. over or by run over
sth. However the latter VP has a second interpretation, namely to read
something carefully.
Complex Transitives
107
different state. The new state is expressed by a Predicative Adjunct/ Object
Complement that follows the DO.
(83) They elected him chairman.
Local authorities have judged his nomination a great success.
Yesterday the Association chose White (to be) their president.
108
5 ! /
Furthermore, as the reader will notice in the following presentation, the evidence
brought in favour of the use and eligibility of these types of traditional
transformations requires knowledge brought to the fore by linguists when
discovering universal principles of language, such as: the Projection Principle.
Projection Principle
Representations at every syntactic level (D-structure, S-structure, Logical
structure) are projected from the lexicon in that they observe the
subcategorisation and thematic properties of lexical items. (Cornilescu
(1996: 178))
109
during derivation. This is syntactically realized by the empty element called trace
[t] which will remain in the initial position of the displaced item. The trace will
indicate the subcategorized position, hence the syntactic function and the
thematic role of the moved constituent, as in the following example:
The trace forms a chain with the moved constituent. In the chain (whati; ti), the
trace ti shows that what functions as a Direct Object thematically indexed (i) as
Goal. The trace is a phonologically null category left behind after movement.
/4 /
Linguists such as Koopman (1984), Chomsky (1986 b), Radford (1988) claim
that whenever there is an empty Inflection (I) in a Clause (so when there is no
Modal/Auxiliary), the finite verb originates in the VP, but is moved into the
empty I by V-MOVEMENT, acquiring the Tense and Agreement properties
associated with I, becoming an inflected verb-form:
110
V-MOVEMENT
Clear evidence in favour of this theory is offered by the case of the verbs
HAVE and BE which are always extracted from the VP to fill a finite empty I
position, where they acquire all relevant Tense-Agreement features:
NP I
Spec N I[+finite] VP
A N must Spec V
priest not V
lie
Notice that the negative adverb is placed in the Specifier of the VP allowing the
modal auxiliary to move into the I-node to acquire its inflectional features.
111
In the case of aspectual auxiliaries, for instance, the particle not is directly
attached to the inflected forms of HAVE and BE which supports their movement
from the VP into the empty finite I. According to the pattern:
(7) Matt [I will] not [VP drive carefully].
we can notice that the negative particle is inserted between the Inflection (here
the Modal Auxiliary will) and the VP. The inflected forms of BE and HAVE
clearly take over the same position as the Modal Auxiliary inasmuch as the
negative particle follows them closely:
The example above shows how the Aspectual Auxiliary be moves out of the VP
into I by V-MOVEMENT to acquire the necessary Tense-Agreement features.
The same transformation occurs in the case of the Aspectual Auxiliary have
which is inflected for Tense and Agreement, surfacing as the 3rd person singular
Present Tense form has.
112
Activity. Discuss the derivation of the following sentences, providing arguments
to support your analysis:
1. Mary felt very lonely.
2. The sun was shining brightly.
3. They had met before.
4. This ring means engagement.
5. Your friend has not passed the exam.
4 / ) $ 7 "8 $ "
(12) S
C S
e
NP I VP
He can ride a bike
I-MOVEMENT
113
However, I-MOVEMENT is blocked in Yes/No Interrogative Dependant
Clauses introduced by the overt Complementisers whether/if that fill in the
former empty category:
(13) They wondered [whether/if he could ride a bike].
Whenever several rules are applicable one after another, we get a derivation of
the sentence under analysis. For instance, the derivation proposed for the Yes/No
Direct Question Is the baby crying? can be represented as follows:
To put it into words, there are two stages in the derivation starting from the D-
structure (14) (a) until the final derived structure, the S-structure (14) (c). Firstly,
we apply V-MOVEMENT on the D-structure, by which the Aspectual Auxiliary
be is moved into the empty Inflection position acquiring the Tense-Agreement
features. Secondly, we apply I-MOVEMENT so that the inflected form is moves
into the empty category that precedes the derived sentence (14) (b) providing the
interrogative form of the D-structure, under the form of the Yes/No direct
question Is the baby crying?.
114
Activity. Discuss the derivation of the following sentences, providing arguments
to support your analysis:
1. Is it raining?
2. Will you help us?
3. Do you remember me?
4. Does his father read the newspaper?
5. May I call you tonight?
6 %4 / ) 6 %4 8 $ "
Starting from embedded questions, the Government and Binding Theory states
that direct questions are also Complementizer Phrases whose Complementizer
position is empty in the Deep structure.
The head of the VP, namely the highest auxiliary moves into the Inflection
position and then into the Complementizer position to derive the correct word
order or Surface structure of a Yes/No question for instance.
Yes/No questions are used when the speaker is interested in the truthfulness or
falsity of a situation:
(15) A: Have you bought a new car?
B: Yes/No
By asking Wh-questions the speaker is aware of the fact, however he/she requires
further information about certain items already mentioned in a sentence. As the
label states it, such questions begin with an interrogative wh-phrase, such as who,
what, which, when, where, why including how as well:
115
Besides such direct Wh-questions, there are also indirect/dependant Wh-
questions that make up the Complement of a verb like ask from the Main Clause:
(17) They asked him what his name was.
Notice the difference in structure between (16) and (17). The D-structure of (16)
has obviously been affected by transformations, such as I-MOVEMENT and
Wh-MOVEMENT in order to derive the question, whereas in (17) operator
fronting cannot take place as the embedded/subordinate clause is introduced by
the Wh-phrase (here, what) which fills the Complementiser slot.
Q S
COMP S
I NP VP
N I V
N V NP
116
The diagram illustrates the stages followed to derive the interrogative structure,
as follows:
Stage 1: modal operator/ Inflection fronting which shifts can around the
subject; the Inflection moves to the left into the empty Complementiser
position outside the Sentence;
Stage 2: Wh-MOVEMENT which extracts the Wh-phrase and moves it
into the leftmost empty slot Q, thereby leaving a trace within the sentence
S which indicates the subcategorized position, both the syntactic function
and the thematic role of the displaced constituent (according to the
Projection Principle).
Lets identify the traces [t] left by the moved items in the examples below:
(19) (a) [NP Her friends] will visit [NP her] [PP at the hospital].
Agent Theme Location
(b) [NPi Whom] will [NP her friends] [I t] visit [NPi t] [PP at the
hospital]?
Theme Agent Location
(c) [PPi Where] will [NP her friends] [I t] visit [NPi her] [PPi t]?
Location Agent Theme
As the -criterion states that all Arguments must have a theta-role, we might
easily think that sentences like (19) (b) and (c) are ill-formed. Hence, the need to
accept the existence of a D-structure like (19) (a) subjected to the respective Wh-
movements by which certain wh-phrases (here, whom and where) have been
extracted and preposed in a slot that precedes the Complementiser.
So we can state that sentences like (19) (b) and (c) derive from the following D-
structures (20) (a) and (b), respectively:
117
(20) (a) Her friends will visit whom at the hospital?
(b) Her friends will visit her where?
It is at this level that the appropriate thematic roles have been assigned and the
Wh-items will carry this information during and after their movement.
118
4 /
119
Thus the transformational approach to Grammar argues that the D-structure of
the sentence in the active voice is converted into the S-structure of a sentence in
the passive voice by applying the following transformations:
Stage 4: The above derived structure (24) clearly shows that the NP a
camera functioning as Subject carries the thematic role of Theme. Thus,
120
according to the -grid of the verb bring, the NP Mary must become the
Agent of the initiated action. This will be done by inserting the passive
preposition BY in front of the new Object, providing the final derived
structure or the S-structure of the active sentence:
(26) [A camera] will be brought [by Mary].
At this point, one may argue that by inserting another preposition like to, for
instance, in front of the NP Mary, we also get a grammatical S-structure:
(27) [A camera] will be brought [to Mary].
121
NP-MOVEMENT in ergative structures
Starting the derivation of example (28) (a) The postman rang the bell, we decide
to follow the same procedure as in the above (22) (Mary will bring a camera.).
In the first stage we need an empty NP Subject so we apply NP-movement to the
postman as shown below:
(31) [t] rang [the bell] [the postman].
122
As no grammatical sentence in English can allow an empty NP Subject. We must
farther on apply NP-movement to the DO the bell which is promoted to the
Subject position:
(33) [The bell] rang [t] [by the postman].
Theme Agent
At this stage we notice that the verb allows us either to delete the Agent, thus
deriving the ergative clause (34) or to insert the passive Auxiliary BE which is
inflected with the Tense-Agreement features and attach EN to the main verb,
hence deriving the passive construction (35).
(34) [The bell] rang [t].
(35) [The bell] was rung [by the postman].
Middle structures are also activo-passive constructions like the ergative ones
presented in the previous subchapter.
123
on which we firstly apply NP Subject Demotion and insertion of the Agentive
preposition by required by the thematic information of the displaced constituent
(Agent):
At this stage one can decide whether to delete the Agent in order to derive the
middle construction or to insert the passive Auxiliary BE and attach EN to the
main verb and obtain the passive alternative.
124
) " "
As the reader can notice along the presentation in this chapter, the evidence
brought in favour of such transformations makes use of several principles and
concepts that were determined in fact by other refined approaches that followed
the Transformational Approach to Grammar, as linguists tried to identify
universal rather than individual rules, universal principles governing the
application of transformations that derive further structures.
Here are only a few of the recurrent principles indirectly touched upon in this
book, as defined by Radford in his works (1988; 2003):
125
Trace Erasure Principle
No moved constituent can erase the trace of another constituent.
Headedness Principle
Every syntactic structure is a projection of a head word.
Binarity Principle
Every syntactic structure is binary-branching.
126
127
128
1. Name and exemplify the non-finite forms of the verb.
2. Make the difference between: adjuncts and disjuncts. Exemplify.
3. Analyse the following predications in terms of cause-effect relationship
and classify them from [-VOLITION] to [+VOLITION] taking into
account the types of entities [RATIONAL] involved:
a. The new law revolted the medical staff.
b. Black clothes grieve me all the time.
c. George prevented Michael from climbing that mountain.
d. The Doctor cured her in a month.
e. The student persuaded his teacher that he was right.
4. Analyse the structure of the verb phrase in:
a. set off on a journey b. make up for the lost time
5. Exemplify ergative verbs. Explain why they form a specialised system.
'
129
1
130
5
2. Provide examples and draw the tree diagrams to account for the following
statements taken from Bas Aarts (2008):
a. The aspectual auxiliary acquires its inflectional present tense ending by
moving from the VP that dominates it into the I-node.
b. If a clause contains a modal verb or the infinitival marker to, these elements
are positioned under the I-node.
131
:
132
;
4. Turn the following sentences into the negative and comment upon the
syntactic and semantic aspects of negation:
a. It may rain.
b. Mary must have missed the train.
c. He was dishonest and merciless.
d. Mary woke up and so did I.
133
<
1. Account for the use of much and many as Negative Polarity Items.
2. Identify the types of interrogative sentences and name some of their syntactic
properties:
a. Has he been running?
b. Whose signature was faked?
c. Nobody cares, do they?
d. So, you quite dislike your step-father!
Dislike him? I hate him!
e. Is he sleeping, reading or talking on the phone?
134
=
2. Discuss the structure of the following Noun Phrases and draw the
corresponding tree diagrams:
a. direct exchanges between candidates
b. failure of institutions on Wall Street
c. quite rapidly changing decisions of the Government
d. some very clever remarks
135
>
2. Explain the principles that lie at the basis of the following transformations:
a. They offered some money to my uncle.
a. They offered my uncle some money.
3. Analyse the predications and specify the type and the syntactic functions of the
internal arguments of the verbs in the following sentences:
a. Inflation threatens many peoples jobs.
b. They must have used a rope.
c. The guest-speaker provided further details on the topic.
d. Our neighbours refurnished the kitchen.
136
Bibliography
Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press
Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on government and binding, Dordrecht: Foris
Chomsky, N. (1986) Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, Mass., London:
M.I.T. Press
Cornilescu, Alexandra (1982) English Syntax 2, TUB
137
Fillmore, C.J. (1968) The case for case. In E. Bach & R.T.Harms (eds), Universals in
linguistic theory, 1-88, London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
Horn, L.R., Kato, Y. (2000) Introduction: Negation and Polarity at the Millenium. In
Horn and Kato (eds) Studies in Negation and Polarity, Oxford University Press,
pp.1-19
Kim, J.B., Sells, P. (2007) English Syntax: an Introduction, Center for the Study of
Language and Information
Klima (1964) Negation in English. In J.A.Fodor and J.J.Katz, eds., Readings in the
philosophy of language, Englewood Cliffs, N.Y.: Prentice-Hall
Lawler, John (2008) Negation and Negative Polarity in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of
the Language Sciences
138
Neagu Maria-Ionela (2008) From Transformational Grammar to the Minimalist
Approach: structure, meaning and function, Buletinul UPG, Ploiesti, seria
Filologie, nr. 1/2008, p. 99-104
Pinker, S. (1989) Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure,
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Pollock, J.-Y. (1989) Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP.
Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365-424
Quirk, R.S.Greenbaum, G. Leech and J.Svartvik (1972) A Grammar of Contemporary
English, Seminar Press, London
Radford, Andrew (1988) Transformational Grammar, CUP
Roberts, Paul, (1968) Modern Grammar, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World Inc.
Sailer, M. (1995) Complement Anaphora and Negative Polarity Items, in Proceedings
of Sinn und Bedeutung 11, E. Puig-Waldmller (ed), Barcelona: Universitat
Pompeu Fabra, pp. 494-508
Serban, Domnica (1984) English Syntax 1, TUB.
Serban, D., Ha gan, R., Moisescu, D. (2002) English Syntax Workbook, Editura
Funda iei Romnia de Mine
Side Richard, Wellman Guy (2002) Grammar and Vocabulary for Cambridge
Advanced and Proficiency, Longman
Van Valin, Robert, J. LaPolla, Randy (1997) Syntax. Structure, meaning and function.
CUP.
139