Professional Documents
Culture Documents
On December 31, 2015 the accounts receivable control account of Ipil-ipil Co. had a
balance of P181,000. An analysis of the accounts receivable account showed the
following:
REQUIRED:
Determine the trade and other receivables to be reported on the entitys December 31,
2015 statement of financial position.
In the audit of Beatles Company, the auditor had an appreciation of the following schedule
and noted some comments for possible adjustments:
Beatles Company
Accounts Receivable Schedule
December 31, 2015
The external auditor submitted the following audit comments for possible adjustments:
This Boy Company Merchandise worth P160,000 was destroyed while in transit
on May 31, 201, terms FOB Destination. The carrier was
billed on June 15, 2015. (See Ticket To Ride Corp. and
Yesterday Corp.)
Let It Be Corp. Paid in full on December 30, 2015 but not recorded.
Collections were deposited on January 2, 2016.
REQUIRED:
1. Adjusting entries as of December 31, 2015.
2. Adjusted balance of Accounts Receivable Trade as of December 31, 2015.
In connection with the audit of the financial statements of Praktis Corporation, your audit
senior instructed you to examine the companys accounts receivable.
Prior to any adjustments you were able to extract the following balances from Praktis trial
balance as of December 31, 2015:
From the schedule of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2015, you determined that
this account includes the following:
The credit balance in customers account represents collection from a customer whose
account had been written-off as uncollectible in 2014.
Accounts receivable for more than a year totaling, P21,000 should be written off.
Confirmation replies received directly from customers disclosed the following exceptions:
Robert We do not owe this amount *%#@ (bad Investigation revealed that
word). We did not receive any merchandise goods sold for P16,000
from your company. were shipped to Robert on
December 29, 2015, terms
FOB shipping point. The
goods were lost in transit
and the shipping company
has acknowledged its
responsibility for the lost of
the merchandise.
Jay-ar We have not yet sold the goods. We will Merchandise billed for
remit the proceeds as soon as the goods P18,000 were consigned to
are sold. Jay-ar on December 30,
2015. The goods cost
P13,000.
Based on your discussion with Praktis Credit Manager, you both agreed that an
allowance for doubtful accounts should be maintained using the following rates:
60 days old and below 1%
61 to 90 days 2%
Over 90 days 5%
REQUIRED:
Professional Company produces paints and related products for sale to the construction
industry throughout Metro Manila. While sales have remained relatively stable despite a
decline in the amount of new construction, there has been a noticeable change in the
timeliness with which the companys customers are paying their bills.
The company sells its products on payment terms of 2/10, n/30. In the past, over 75
percent of the credit customers have taken advantage of the discount by paying within 10
days of the invoice date. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the number of
customers taking the full 30 days to pay has increased. Current indications are that less
than 60% of the customers are now taking the discount. Uncollectible account as a
percentage of total credit sales have risen from the 1.5% provided the past years to 4%
in the current year.
In response to your request for more information on the deterioration accounts receivable
collections, the companys controller has prepare the following report:
Professional Company
Accounts Receivable Collections
December 31, 2015
The fact that some credit accounts will provide uncollectible is normal, and annual bad
debt written-offs had been 1.5% of total credit sales for many years. However, during the
year 2015, this percentage increased to 4%. The accounts receivable balance is
P1,500,000, and the condition of this balance in terms of age and probability of collections
is shown below:
REQUIRED:
1. Adjusted balance of the allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2015.
2. The necessary adjusting journal entry to adjust the allowance for doubtful accounts as
of December 31, 2015.
The Poster Co. sells direct to retail customers and also to wholesalers. Accounts
receivable and an allowance for bad debts are maintained separately for each division.
On January 1, 2015 the balance of the retail accounts receivable was P209,000 while the
bad debts with respect to retail customers was a credit of P7,600.
Bad debts are provided for as a percentage of credit sales. The accountant calculates the
percentage annually by using the experience of the three years prior to the current year.
The formula is bad debts written off less recoveries expressed as a percentage of the
credit sales for the same period. cash receipts in 2015 from credit sales to retail customers
was P1,380,200.
REQUIRED:
In connection with your examination of the financial statements of Ringo Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2015, you were able to obtain certain information during your audit
of the accounts receivable and related accounts.
The December 31, 2015 balance in the Accounts Receivable control accounts is
P837,900.
REQUIRED:
1. Determine the following as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015:
a. Accounts receivable
b. Allowance for doubtful accounts
c. Doubtful accounts expense
2. Adjusting entries as of December 31, 2015
The balance sheet of Yoko Corporation reported the following long-term receivables as
of December 31, 2014:
In connection with your audit, you were able to gather the following transactions during
2015 and other information pertaining to the companys long-term receivables:
a. The note receivable from sale of plant bears interest at 12% per annum. The note is
payable in 3 annual installments of P2,000,000 plus interest on the unpaid balance
every April 1. The initial principal and interest payment was made on April 1, 2015.
b. The note receivable from officer is dated December 31, 2014, earns interest at 10%
per annum, and is due on December 31, 2017. The 2015 interest was received on
December 31, 2015.
c. The corporation sold a piece of equipment to Yes, Inc. on April 1, 2015, in exchange
for an P800,000 non-interest bearing note due on April 1, 2017. The note had no
ready market, and there was no established exchange price for the equipment. The
prevailing interest rate for a note of this type at April 1, 2015, was 12%. The present
value factor of 1 for two periods at 12% is 0.797.
d. A tract of land was sold by the corporation to No Co. on July 1, 2015, for P4,000,000
under an installment sale contract. No Co. signed a 4-year 11% note for P2,800,000
on July 1, 2015, in addition to the down payment of P1,200,000. The equal annual
payments of principal and interest on the note will be P902,500 payable on July 1,
2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019. The land had an established cash price of P4,000,000,
and its cost to the corporation was P3,000,000. The collection of the installments on
this note is reasonably assured.
REQUIRED:
Determine the following as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015:
1. Noncurrent receivables
2. Current portion of long-term receivables
3. Accrued interest receivable
4. Interest income
On January 1, 2015, Pedro Company sold land that originally cost P400,000 to Buyer
Company. As payment, Buyer gave Pedro Company a P600,000 note. The note bears of
4% and is to be repaid in three annual installments of P200,000 (plus interest on the
outstanding balance). The first payment is due on December 31, 2015. The market price
of the land is not reliably determinable. The prevailing rate of interest for notes of this type
is 14% on January 1, 2015 and is 15% on December 31, 2015.
Pedro made the following journal entries in relation of the sale of land and the related
note receivable:
January 1, 2015
Cash P224,000
Notes receivable P200,000
Interest income 24,000
Pedro reported the notes receivable in its statement of financial position at December 31,
2015 as part of trade and other receivables.
REQUIRED:
1. Determine the following as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015:
a. Correct gain on sale of land
b. Correct interest income
c. Overstatement of profit
d. Correct carrying amount of note receivable
e. Overstatement of working capital
My Love Corporation made the following entries in relation to the sale of the equipment
and the related note receivable:
January 1, 2014
Cash P 300,000
Notes receivable 1,705,900
Cost of goods sold 750,000
Sales P2,005,900
Inventory 750,000
Cash P 341,180
Notes receivable P 341,180
Cash P 341,180
Notes receivable P 341,180
My Love Corporation reported the notes receivable in its statement of financial position
at December 31, 2014 and 2015 as part of trade and other receivables.
REQUIRED:
You are examining the financial statements of Merlyn, Inc. for the year ended December
31, 2015. Your analysis of the 2015 entries in the Notes Receivable account follows:
Merlyn, Inc.
Analysis of Notes Receivable
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
Date
2015 Debit Credit
Jan. 1 Balance Forwarded P118,000
Received P25,000 6% note due
10/29/15 from Anna whose trade
Account was past due
(1) Balances at January 1, 2015, were a debit of P1,400 in the Accrued Interest
Receivable account and a credit of P400 in the Unearned Interest Income account.
The P118,000 debit in the Note Receivable account consisted the following three
notes:
(2) No entries were made during 2015 to the Accrued Interest Receivable or the
Unearned Interest Income account and only one entry for a credit of P1,200 on
December 31, appeared in the Interest Income account.
(3) All notes were from the trade customers unless otherwise indicated.
(4) Debits and credits affecting Notes Receivable were correctly recorded unless facts
indicated otherwise.
REQUIRED:
1. Determined the following as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015:
a. Notes receivable-trade
b. Interest income
2. Adjusting entries as of December 31, 2015
PROBLEM NO. 11 Loan impairment
The borrower paid the interest due on December 31, 2014. However, during 2015 the
borrower began to experience financial difficulties, requiring the bank to reassess the
collectability of the loan. As of December 31, 2015, the bank expects that only P8,000,000
of the principal will be recovered. The P8,000,000 principal amount is expected to be
collected in two equal installments on December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2019. The
prevailing interest rates for similar type of notes as of December 31, 2014 and 2015 are
15% and 16% respectively.
REQUIRED:
1. In the audit of which of the following general ledger accounts will tests of controls be
particularly appropriate?
a. Equipment
b. Bank charges
c. Bonds payable
d. Sales
.
2. The purpose of test of controls over shipping is to determine whether
a. Billed goods have been shipped.
b. Shipments are billed.
c. Shipping department personnel are competent.
d. Credit is approved before goods are shipped.
4. An auditor most likely would review an entitys periodic accounting for the numerical
sequence of shipping documents and invoices to support managements financial
statement assertion of
a. Existence or occurrence
b. Rights and obligations
c. Valuation
d. Completeness
5. Which of the following might be detected by an auditors review of the clients cut-off?
a. Excessive goods returned for credit
b. Unrecorded sales discounts
c. Lapping of year-end accounts receivable
d. Inflated sales for the year
6. An auditor who has confirmed accounts receivable may discover that the sales
journal was held open past year-end if
a. Positive confirmations sent to debtors are not returned
b. Negative confirmations sent to debtors are not retuned
c. Most of the returned negative confirmations indicate that the debtors owes a
ledger balance that the amount being confirmed.
d. Most of the returned positive confirmations indicate that the debtor owes a smaller
balance than the amount being confirmed.
7. The auditor finds situation in which one person has the ability to collect receivables,
make deposits, issue credit memos and record receipt of payments. The auditor
suspects the individual may be stealing from cash receipts. Which of the following
audit procedures would be most effective in discovering fraud in this scenario?
a. Send positive confirmations to a random selection of customers.
b. Send negative confirmations to all outstanding accounts receivable customers.
c. Perform a detailed review of debits to customer discounts, sales returns, or other
debit accounts, excluding cash posted to the cash receipts journal.
d. Take a sample of bank deposits and trace the detail in each bank deposit back to
the entry in the cash receipts journal.
8. All of the following are examples of substantive tests to verify valuation of net accounts
receivable except the
a. Re-computation of the allowance for bad debts.
b. Inspection of accounts for current versus non-current status in the statement of
financial position.
c. Inspection of the aging schedule and credit records of past due accounts
d. Comparison of the allowance for bad debts with past records.
10. The negative request form of accounts receivable confirmation may be used when the
Combined Assessed Number of Consideration by
Level Of Inherent and Small Balances the Recipient is
Control Risk is is
a. Low Many Likely
b. Low Few Unlikely
c. High Few Likely
d. High Many Likely
11. Which of the following procedures would an auditor most likely perform for year-end
accounts receivable confirmations when the auditor did not receive replies to second
requests?
a. Review the cash receipts journal for the month prior to year-end.
b. Intensify the study of internal control concerning the revenue cycle.
c. Increase the assessed level of detection risk for the existence assertion.
d. Inspect the shipping records documenting the merchandise sold to the debtors.
12. Which of the following is the greatest drawback of using subsequent collections
evidenced only by a deposit slip as an alternative procedure when responses to
positive accounts receivable confirmations are not received?
a. Checking of subsequent collections can never be used as an alternative auditing
procedure.
b. By examining a deposit slip only, the auditor does not know whether the payment
is for the receivable at the balance sheet date or a subsequent transaction.
c. A deposit slip is not received directly by the auditor.
d. A customer may not have made a payment on a timely basis.
.