Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2012
10.2)
10.3)
Page | 1
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.4)
a) 6
b) 11
c) 5(Note: It is tempting to select 1, but the graphs are drawn on
cumulative basis)
d) 4
e) 2
f) 10
g) 3
h) 7
i) 9
10.5)
(a) Contribution M arg in per unit = 250 - 80 = $170
170
Contribution M arg in percentage = 100 = 68% Ans.
250
50, 000
(b) B.E.P. = = 294.11 295units
250 - 80
10.6)
F 200, 000
(a) B.E.P. = $450, 000 =
P -V P -V
P P
P -V
= 0.444 44.4% Ans.
P
P - V P - 12
(b ) Contribution M arg in per unit = 0.444 = =
P P
P = 12 / 0.56 = $21.42 per unit Ans.
10.7) (a)
2
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
F 50, 000
(b) B.E.P. = = = $66666.66 Ans.
V 1 - 0.25
1-
P
(c ) New Variable cos t and selling price ratio = V / 0.94 P 0.25 / 0.94 = 0.2659
F 50, 000
B.E.P. = = = $68115.94 Ans.
V 1 - 0.2659
1-
P
10.8)
(a) Line A has the largest contribution margin
So, $255, 000 - $3(20, 000) = $195, 000 remains unchanged. For the line B,
$195, 000
= 97,500
$2 units should be produced. Therefore, 20,000 units of
line A and 97,500 units of line Bneed to be produced to breakeven.
$3(20, 000) $2(80, 000) $1(100, 000) - $255, 000 = $65, 000 .
The new break-even point:
The fixed cost $255, 000 - 20,000($3) = $195, 000 remains
unchanged.
The demand of Line B is 80,000 units and the fixed cost
$195,000 - $2(80,000) = $35,000remains unchanged.
The break-even point for line C is $35,000 / $1 = 35,000units.
Therefore, the new break-even is 20,000 units of line A, 80,000
units of line B, and 35,000units of line C.
10.9)
a) Marginal tax rates:
3
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.10)
a) Marginal tax rates with the project:
10.11)
Incremental tax rate calculation:
Year 1 Year 2
Revenue $200,000 $200,000
Operating Costs $100,000 $100,000
Depreciation $10,000 $16,000
Taxable income $90,000 $84,000
4
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
Comments: Note that the marginal tax rates over the project life remain
unchanged because the additional income from the new project is not large
enough to push the company into a higher tax bracket.
Year 1
Taxable income without project $195,000
Income taxes $59,300
5
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.14)
(a) Taxable gain:
Note: Ordinary gains are not included in this calculation, even though
these gains will be treated as ordinary income. Of course, these figures can
be included to find the total tax liabilities.
6
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.15)
Note 1: The loss from disposal of the asset is not a part of operating
activities, so it is not included in the operating income calculation.
Note 2: Income taxes = $113,900 + 0.34($590,000- $335,000)
= $200,600
7
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.16)
(a), (b), and (c)
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.18)
X = $60, 000( P / A,15%,10)
= $301,128
10.23)
The required lease payment should be $16,651 per year, payable at the end of each year.
If the ACLC schedules each lease payment to be made at the beginning of each year, the
required lease payment should be much lower, or precisely $15,137 per year.
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.24)
Investment decision based on after-tax IRR:
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.25)
Investment in a new trench excavator:
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.26)
Tucson Solar Company:
(a)
(b)
AE(12%) = ( $62, 469 ) ( A / P /12%, 6)
= $15,194
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.27)
Investment in 3-D computerized car-styling system
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.28)
Investment in Mazda automatic screw machine:
10.29)
10.30)
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.31)
(a), (b), and (c)
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.33) (a)
(c) Which alternative to choose? The debt financing option is more attractive.
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.37)
10.38)
Option 1: Lease (a lease paid at the start of each period)
($800,000)(0.05) = $40,000
PW(12%)purchase = -$931,551
Option 3: Remodel
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
Plant A
Capital recovery cost with return:
A2 = (1 - 0.39)($1,964) = $1,198.04
Unit cost:
$2,158,520
= $0.04317 / kWh
50,000,000kWh
Plant B
Capital recovery cost with return:
Unit cost:
$2,133,330
= $0.04267 / kWh
50, 000, 000kWh
Plant C
Unit cost:
$3,183, 010
= $0.06366 / kWh
50, 000, 000kWh
10.40)
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
P2 = -$13,169( P / A,15%, 4)
= -$37,597
(c) Should the truck be leased or purchased? The borrowbuy option is a better
choice.
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.41)
Note: Since the operating revenues will be the same for both options, we will only
consider the cost of ownership.
PW of after-tax O&M
P2 = -$37,857( P / A,15%, 4)
= -$108, 080
Input Output
PW(15%)
Tax Rate(%) = 40 = ($143,405)
MARR(%) = 15
0 1 2 3 4
Income Statement
Revenues (savings) $0 $0 $0 $0
Expenses:
O&M $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
Depreciation 24,000 38,400 23,040 6,912
Debt interest (10%) 12,000 9,414 6,570 3,441
PW of after-tax leasing
(c) Should ICI buy or lease the equipment? The buying option is a better choice.
10.42)
(a) OMC PW cost of leasing (payments at start of year):
P2 = $40,386( P / A,15%,3)
= $92, 209.32
Sample calculation:
Note that both depreciation and interest expenses are not responsive to
inflation.
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
0.18 - 0.05
=
i = 12.38%
1 0.05
PW(12.38%) no inflation = $92, 781
PW(18%) with inflation = $98, 771
present value gain = $98, 771 - $92, 781
=$5,990
10.45)
(a), (b)
10.46)
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.47)
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
0.09 - 0.03
imunicipal = = 5.825%
1 0.03
isavings = 2.91%
Select B.
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
0.15 - 0.08
i= = 6.48%
1 0.08 (Inflation-free MARR)
10.51)
(a) & (b) Project cash flows in actual and constant dollars:
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
(e) Required additional before-tax annual revenue in actual dollars (equal amount) to make-up the inflation loss.
$4,103( A / P,18%, 6)
= $1,955
1 - 0.40
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
Note 1: In a strict sense, capital gains are only realized for the sale of land.
Note 2: It is assumed that the building will be disposed of at the end of December of the 12th year.
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.53)
(a) The net after-tax cash flows for each financing option:
10.54) (a),(b),(c) & (d): Assumption: The building will be placed in service in January.
Note: If the firm decides not to invest in the project, the firm could write off the R&D expenditure. The amount of write-off will
be (0.38)($8,000,000) = $3,040,000. If the firm decides to undertake this project, then an opportunity cost of $3,040,000 will be
incurred.
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
(e)
(f)
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
10.55) (a) The net cash flow from the cogeneration project with bond financing:
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
(b). The maximum annual lease amount that ACC is willing to pay is $907,673.
10.56)
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
(a) & (b) The project cash flows and IRR with no inflation:
(e). The economic gain in present worth due to inflation = $108,411- $90,992 = $17,419.