Standard Layout - Qualitative Detailed RR Operation - Plan: Project Data

Standard Layout - Qualitative Detailed
RR Operation.plan
Project Data
File Name RR Operation.plan
Plan Title RR Operation.plan
Total Tasks 1565
Completed 1219
In Progress 111
Plan TimeNow 01 May 2015
Deterministic Finish 06 Jul 2016
Total Deterministic Cost $2,121,470
Actual Cost to Date $1,671,005
Deterministic Remaining Cost $450,465
Report Summary
Report Name Standard Layout - Qualitative Detailed
Date Printed 16 Jul 2015
Total Risks 10
Proposed Risks 0
Open Risks 10
High 2
Medium 4
Low 3
Negligible 1
Impacted (Closed) Risks 0
Managed (Closed) Risks 0
Rejected (Closed) Risks 0
Threats 10
Opportunities 0
Filter Options
Sections included in report
Include in depth risk information Yes
Include risk assessment information Yes
Include risk response information Yes
Include task impacted information Yes
ID Title
EXS Excess flow to TEG columns
Status Owner
Open AGM
RBS Start Date End Date Exposure

01 May 2015 06 Jul 2016 $0
Cause Effect
Slow opening and closure of inlet bypass TUCO discharge line overpressure trip
Description
'Ensure rapid change over of
compressor to minimise excess flow to
TEG columns.
Pre-mitigation Score 40 High

Post-mitigation Score 0 Negligible
Qualitative Quantitative
Pre-
Schedule N 0
mitigation
Post-
N 0
Qualitative Quantitative mitigation
Pre- Pre-
M 40% Cost N $0
mitigation mitigation
Post- Post-
N 0% N $0
Pre-
Performance VH
mitigation
Post-
N
mitigation
Mitigation Title:
Description Install quick response time automatic valves
Mitigated
Responsibility Designer Status Proposed $0 Actual Cost $0
Cost
Task
TaskID undefined
Description
Target Start Target Finish
Start Date 01 May 2015 Finish Date 06 Jul 2016 01 May 2015 06 Jul 2016
Date Date
ID Title
MA Moisture Analyser
Status Owner
Open External (OMVP)

01 May 2015 06 Jul 2016 $0
Cause Effect
Future condion of gas might change Off-spec gas delivered
Description
'Consider additional moisture analyser
on common export gas line (future plan
to develop the management
of current metering station to third
party) Only physical connections for
the moisture analyser will be
implemented in this phase
Pre-mitigation Score 0 Negligible

Pre-
Schedule N 0
mitigation
Post-
N 0
Pre- Pre-
VL 5% Cost N $0
Post- Post-
N 0% N $0
Pre-
Performance N
mitigation
Post-
N
mitigation
Mitigation Title:
Description Physical connections were installed
External Mitigated
Responsibility Status Proposed $0 Actual Cost $0
(OMVP) Cost
Task
TaskID undefined
Description
Date Date
ID Title
CI Chemical Injection
Status Owner
Open AGM

01 May 2015 06 Jul 2016 $0
Cause Effect
Inlet gas condition changes over time TEG degradation, possible off-spec gas delivery
Description
Possible TEG contamination with gas byproducts (heavy hidrocarbons, salt, H2S etc)
Pre-mitigation Score 5 Low

Pre-
Schedule N 0
mitigation
Post-
N 0
Pre- Pre-
M 40% Cost N $0
Post- Post-
N 0% N $0
Pre-
Performance L
mitigation
Post-
N
mitigation
Mitigation Title:
Description Chemical injection skid provided to counter this potential threat
Mitigated
Responsibility AGM Status Proposed $0 Actual Cost $0
Cost
Task
TaskID undefined
Description
Date Date
ID Title
LT Level Transmitter
Status Owner
Open AGM

01 May 2015 06 Jul 2016 $0
Cause Effect
Possible vessel rupture TEG spill-out, gas release into atmosphere
Description
Consider installing a full range level
transmitter on reboiler 38-V-104
Pre-mitigation Score 6 Medium

Pre-
Schedule N 0
mitigation
Post-
N 0
Pre- Pre-
L 20% Cost N $0
Post- Post-
N 0% N $0
Pre-
Performance M
mitigation
Post-
N
mitigation
Mitigation Title:
Corrosion allowance was taken into account during engineering phase, the vessel
Description
calculation took this into consideration
Mitigated
Responsibility Unassigned Status Proposed $0 Actual Cost $0
Cost
Task
TaskID undefined
Description
Date Date
ID Title
SPIR SPIR
Status Owner
Open OMVP

01 May 2015 06 Jul 2016 $0
Cause Effect
Improper maintenance, poor design, lack of Unit downtime, loss of production, off-spec gas
spare parts delivery
Description
Dynamic equipment breakdown

Pre-
Schedule N 0
mitigation
Post-
N 0
Pre- Pre-
L 20% Cost N $0
Post- Post-
N 0% N $0
Pre-
Performance M
mitigation
Post-
N
mitigation
Mitigation Title:
Description Critical dynamic equipment has backup installed, proper SPIR in place
Mitigated
Responsibility OMVP Status Proposed $0 Actual Cost $0
Cost
Task
TaskID undefined
Description
Date Date
ID Title
MCP Manual Call Points
Status Owner
Open AGM

01 May 2015 06 Jul 2016 $0
Cause Effect
Description
Manual points will be available in the field for personnel to indicate the presence of fire or gas.
Manual call points shall be:
? Located as per their design intent;
? Free from damage or impairment which may impact on operation;
? Send a signal to the site fire and gas panel to undertake an executive action based on alarm/trip
points defined in the site fire and gas philosophy.

Pre-
Schedule N 0
mitigation
Post-
N 0
Pre- Pre-
M 40% Cost N $0
Post- Post-
N 0% N $0
Pre-
Performance M
mitigation
Post-
VL
mitigation
Mitigation Title:
Carry out inhibited function check of the manual call points to confirm the correct executive
action. Audit of fire and gas detection testing strategy against industry best practice.
Description Witnessing of inhibited function testing to ensure compliance with procedures. Review of
maintenance records to confirm no equipment is overdue for testing and agreed frequencies
are being achieved.
Mitigated
Cost
Task
TaskID undefined
Description
Date Date
ID Title
F&G Fire and Gas Detection
Status Owner
Open AGM

01 May 2015 06 Jul 2016 $0
Cause Effect
Description
Required to be available and comply with the criteria specified in this performance standard unless
agreed with Technical Authority. Site management practices for management of change and deviation
from standards.
Pre-mitigation Score 28 High

Pre-
Schedule N 0
mitigation
Post-
N 0
Pre- Pre-
H 60% Cost N $0
Post- Post-
N 0% N $0
Pre-
Performance H
mitigation
Post-
VH
mitigation
Mitigation Title:
Description Type, sample size and frequency to be in line with existing site wide policies.
Mitigated
Cost
Task
TaskID undefined
Description
Date Date
ID Title
SS Structural support
Status Owner
Open AGM

01 May 2015 06 Jul 2016 $0
Cause Effect
Description
All structural supports will be fit for purpose to meet their design requirements
There shall be no signs of material defects on vessel supports such that the following criteria is met:
? There shall be no gouges/gross deformation which would challenge the design intent;
? There shall be no missing, loose or significantly corroded fastenings;
? No visible damage to vessel supports which would challenge the design intent.

Pre-
Schedule N 0
mitigation
Post-
N 0
Pre- Pre-
VL 5% Cost N $0
Post- Post-
VL 5% N $0
Pre-
Performance L
mitigation
Post-
N
mitigation
Mitigation Title:
External visual inspections carried out of all valves, pipework and vessels. External Non
Destructive Testing (NDT) carried out for pressure vessels. Audit of inspection strategy
against industry standards and best practice. Witnessing of external visual inspections and
Description
NDT to ensure they are being carried out in line with procedure. Review of maintenance
records to confirm no equipment is overdue for inspection and agreed inspection
frequencies are being achieved.
Mitigated
Cost
Task
TaskID undefined
Description
Date Date
ID Title
FL Flow Limitation
Status Owner
Open Unassigned

01 May 2015 06 Jul 2016 $0
Cause Effect
Description
Restriction orifices shall be fitted in the correct locations and remain within acceptable tolerance of the
design sizing to allow them to function as per their design intent.

Pre-
Schedule N 0
mitigation
Post-
N 0
Pre- Pre-
L 20% Cost N $0
Post- Post-
N 0% N $0
Pre-
Performance L
mitigation
Post-
N
mitigation
Mitigation Title:
Description Inspection of restriction orifices.
Mitigated
Cost
Task
TaskID undefined
Description
Date Date
ID Title
ESD ESD Input
Status Owner
Open Unassigned

01 May 2015 06 Jul 2016 $0
Cause Effect
Description
ESD inputs as defined above shall:
? Operate as per their design intent as detailed in the ESD Cause and Effects (PE-D-A02114-22078-05-
IN-CED-001);
? Shall function at the desired set point.

Pre-
Schedule N 0
mitigation
Post-
N 0
Pre- Pre-
M 40% Cost N $0
Post- Post-
N 0% N $0
Pre-
Performance M
mitigation
Post-
N
mitigation
Mitigation Title:
Description Inhibited function test to ensure signal is received by ESD panel.
Mitigated
Cost
Task
TaskID undefined
Description
Date Date

Standard Layout - Qualitative Detailed RR Operation - Plan: Project Data

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Standard Layout - Qualitative Detailed RR Operation - Plan: Project Data

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Standard Layout - Qualitative Detailed

RBS Start Date End Date Exposure

Pre-mitigation Score 40 High

RBS Start Date End Date Exposure

Pre-mitigation Score 0 Negligible

RBS Start Date End Date Exposure

Pre-mitigation Score 5 Low

RBS Start Date End Date Exposure

Pre-mitigation Score 6 Medium

RBS Start Date End Date Exposure

Pre-mitigation Score 6 Medium

RBS Start Date End Date Exposure

Pre-mitigation Score 10 Medium

RBS Start Date End Date Exposure

Pre-mitigation Score 28 High

RBS Start Date End Date Exposure

Pre-mitigation Score 1 Low

RBS Start Date End Date Exposure

Pre-mitigation Score 3 Low

RBS Start Date End Date Exposure

Pre-mitigation Score 10 Medium

You might also like