You are on page 1of 13

2/22/2009

MainWindSystems

Module4:WindTurbinesand OnShore
Systems
MohamedA.ElSharkawi
DepartmentofElectricalEngineering
University of Washington
UniversityofWashington
Seattle,WA98195 OffShore
ff h
http://SmartEnergyLab.com
Email:elsharkawi@ee.washington.edu

Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.1 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.2

KeyPartsofWindTurbine PowerFlow BladePower

Gearbox
Pblade
Highspeedshaft
Rotatingblades MechanicalPower
WindPower Pm
Pwind
Housing gear G
Generatorand ElectricPower
GearPower
Lowspeedshaft
converter
Pgear Pe
Yaw

Tower

Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.3 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.4

1
2/22/2009

PowerFlow Example
TehachapiisadesertcityinCaliforniawithan
Captured
Captured Inputto
Input to Inputto
Input to Outputpower
Output power
Wind powerfrom gearbox generator P elevationofabout350m,andisknownforits
Power Wind e
Pgear Pm extensivewindfarms.
Pwind Pblade
1. Computethepowerdensityofthewindwhentheair
temperatureis30oCandthespeedofthewindis5m/s
2. Awindturbineatthesitehasthreerotatingblades;
Lossesin
each is 60 m in length Compute the power captured by
eachis60minlength.Computethepowercapturedby
Lossesin thebladesassumingthecoefficientofperformanceis
Lossesinrotating generator
gearbox
bladesandrotor 30%
Coefficientof mechanism
Performance

Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.5 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.6

Solutionofpart1 Example
350
353 ComputethetotalefficiencyiftheCoefficientof
e 29.3( 30 273) 1.12 kg/m
g 3
30 273 performanceis30%,theefficiencyoftherotating
f i 30% th ffi i f th t ti
bladeandrotormechanismis90%,theefficiencyof
1 1 thegearboxis95%andtheefficiencyofthegenerator
w3 1.12 * 53 70.0 W/m is70%
2 2
Solution
Pwind A r 2 * 60 2 * 70 792 kW
C p blade gear generator 0.3 * 0.9 * 0.95 * 0.7 18 %
Pblade Pwind * C p 792 * 0.3 237.6 kW

Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.7 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.8

2
2/22/2009

1.5MWTurbine

Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.9 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.10

BasicWindTurbineSpecifications(2MW)
RapidGrowthofWindTurbineSize
RotorDiameter=80meters
2500
SweptArea=5,026m2
2000 2000 Blade Rotation 15 5 16 5 rpm
BladeRotation=15.516.5rpm
GeneratorVoltage=690Volts
1500 1500 Capacity=1,8002,000kW
kW

Nacelle(housing)Weight=77tons
1000 RotorWeight=41tons
750
Tower Weight = 105 tons
TowerWeight=105tons
500 500
TotalWeight=223tons
300
50 100
0
1980 1984 1992 1995 1998 2004 2006

Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.11 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.12

3
2/22/2009

GE3.6MW TypicalBladelength
Bladelength(m) PowerRating(kW)
27 225
2733 300
3340 500
4044 600
4448 750
4854 1000
5464 1500
6472 2000
7280 2500

Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.13 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.14

CanWeExceed100m? VESTAS
Windspeedincreaseswithheight aboveground 1.8MW
100mdiametercanproduce35MW
Canwegohigherthan100m?
Introducestransportationconstraintsinmost
highways
Maxtrailerdimensionis4.1m(H)X2.6m(W)
Requireslargecranesthatarenotreadilyavailable
Producesanewsetoftechnicalandenvironmental
problems(impactongrid,wake,etc.)

Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.15 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.16

4
2/22/2009

OffShoreWindSystem

Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.17 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.18

TwoBladesTurbines
RunsatfastspeedtoimproveCp
Advantages:
g
Gearboxratioisreduced
Bladeseasiertoassembledonground
Disadvantages:
Forthesamewindspeed,thetwoblade
systemcaptureslesspowerthenthe
threebladesystem
Createsgyroscopic imbalances(bending
momentduetotowerwindshade)
Higherspeedmeansmorenoise
Higherrateofbirdcollisions
Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.19 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.20

5
2/22/2009

BendingMoments(2blade) BendingMoments(3blade)
Whenonebladeisatthetop,itis WindForce Thebottombladeinthe
receivingthemaximumforceofthe shadowofthetower
wind receiveslessthanthe
Thebottombladeisintheshadow maximumforce
ofthetower;thusreceivingless Theothertwobladesarenot
force WindForce
intheverticalposition,so
Theforcesarenotbalancedathub they also receive less than
theyalsoreceivelessthan
Torqueonthehubispulsating, themaximumforce
thusstressingthehubgears
Theforcesarealmost
balancedatthehub
Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.21 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.22

ThreeBladeTurbine Whynot5or7Blades?
Advantages: Moreexpensive WindForce

Slow rotation Increasewindwalleffect


Increase wind wall effect
threebladescapture moreenergythan
twobladesforthesamewindspeed Reductionofwindspeed
Gyroscopicforcesarebetterbalanced infrontoftheblades,
Moreaesthetic,lessnoise,fewerbird thusreducingthe WindForce
collisions
amountofenergythat
Disadvantages: canbecapturedbythe
Slowerrotationincreasesgearboxcosts
blade
Rotorcannotfullyassembledonthe
ground
Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.23 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.24

6
2/22/2009

Pitch,YawandFeatherControl TypicalPowerSpeedCharacteristics
Mostturbinesoperateatwindspeedof12 30mph

Power
PitchControl Windpower
TomaximizeCp
ReduceCp whenwindspeedproducespower Rated
OutputPower
higherthantheratingoftheturbine Power
Regulatetheoutputpoweroftheturbineaspart
ofgridcontrolaction
YawControl
Toaligntherotortofacethewind Rampup
Rampdown
Feathering
Tolockthebladesathighwindspeeds(>50mph) Ratedspeed Cutoutspeed
Cutinspeed

4.25
WindSpeed 4.26
Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington

WindTurbinePerformance TypicalOnShoreSystem
Vestas V80 Power Curve FarmCollection
2000
GridConnection HVGSU Point
1800 Point Point
1600
1400
TrunkLine
Power kW

1200 WPS
1000
800
600 GSU
Grid xfm
f
400 WindPower
200 System
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Windspeed MPH
HVGSU:HighVoltagesideofGenerationStepUptransformer
Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.27 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.28

7
2/22/2009

TypicalOffShoreSystem OffShore
FarmCollection
GridConnection HVGSU Point
Point Point
TrunkCable
MarineCable
WPS

GSU
Grid xfm
f WindPower
System

Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.29 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.30

OffshoreWindEnergy OffshoreWindEnergy
Normallybetween25MW
Agoodmatchbetweengenerationand 80126minbladelength
d
demandd Transportationrestrictionislessthanonshoresystems
28statesintheUSAhavecostallines Mostlyinrelativelyshallowwater(upto30m)
Marinecablesareusedtoconnectthesystemstothe
Thesestatesconsumes78%ofthenational shorestations
electricenergy Cablecapacitance ismuchhigherthanthatfor
overheadlines
900MWoffshorecapacityinstalledinEurope
p y p Thismayresultinleading
Thi lt i l di powerfactorattheshore
f t t th h
10offshoresystem,2.4GWcapacityare station
Inductivecompensationmaybeneededtoprevent
consideredintheUSA theovervoltageattheshorestation

Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.31 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.32

8
2/22/2009

ChallengestoOffshoreSystems ChallengestoOffShoreWind
Highcost ofinstallation Predictionofthedynamicforcesandmotions
Transportation,construction,foundations, acting on off shore turbines are needed
actingonoffshoreturbinesareneeded
anchors,andmoorings Offshorewindsaremuchmoredifficult to
Highcostofmaintenance characterizethanwindsoverland
Marinelife
Technologyislimitedfordeepwaters
Foundationscanactasartificialreefs
Windspecificsafetystandards
Wind specific safety standards fishpopulationincreases
offshoreoilandgasstandards birdpopulationincreases
birdcollisionsincreases
Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.33 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.34

ChallengestoOffShoreWind
Interferencewith
commercialshippingandfishing
recreationalboating.
Couldaffectmaritimeradarsystems
Visualimpactsforsystemsclosetoshores
Impactsoflowfrequencymotionnoiseon
I t fl f ti i
mammals

Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.35 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.36

9
2/22/2009

FactorsAffectingWindGeneration
FloatingTechnology
Windspeedandlengthofwindseason
Mostwindturbinesoperateat416m/s
Diameter ofrotatingblades
Thepowercapturedisproportionaltothesquareof
theradius
a10%increaseinthebladelengthwillresultin
21%increaseinthecapturedpower

Efficiency ofwindturbinecomponents

Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.37 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.38

FactorsAffectingWindGeneration FactorsAffectingWindGeneration

Pitchcontrol Arrangementoftheturbines(arrayeffect)
Withpitchcontrol,theTSR
p , canbeadjustedto
j thebladesofthefrontturbinescreatewakesofturbulent
windthatcanreachtherareturbines
producepoweratawiderangeofwindspeeds.
efficiencyisreducedwhenwindisturbulent.
YawControl Reliabilityandmaintenance
Mostwindturbinesareequippedwithyaw Thecostofelectricitygeneratedbythewindfarmisa
mechanismtokeepthebladesfacingintothe functionof
windasthewinddirectionchanges
g Capitalcost,landuse,maintenance,andcontractualarrangement.
Theearlydesignsofwindturbineswerehighmaintenance
Someturbinesaredesignedtooperateon
machinesaswellascostineffectivesystems.
downwind;theseturbinesdon'tneedyaw Newerdesignshavereliabilityratearound98percent
mechanismsasthewindalignstheseturbines.

Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.39 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.40

10
2/22/2009

WindTurbineTechnolgies
Generator
AsynchronousGenerator(InductionMachine)
SquirrelCageInductionGenerator(SCIG)
q g ( )
WoundRotorInductiongenerator(WRIG)
SynchronousGenerator(SG)
TypesofWindTurbineSystems Controls
NoControl
FixedVARcompensation
Internalvoltageandvar control
External flicker and reactive power controls
Externalflickerandreactivepowercontrols
Pitchcontrol
AGCparticipation
Stabilityandridethroughfaultcontrol

Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.41 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.42

TypesofWTG Type1:SCIGwithFixedCompensation
Type1: Squirrelcageinductiongeneratordirectly FarmCollection
GridConnection HVGSU Point
coupled tothegrid.Mayhavepitchcontrol
to the grid May have pitch control Point Point
SCIG
Type2:Woundrotor inductionmachinewith TrunkLine
externalrotorresistancecontrol Gear
Box
Type3: WoundrotorDoublyfedinduction
generator(Voltageinjectedintherotorwinding) GSU
Grid xfm
f
Type4: Synchronousorinductiongenerator,the Fixed
statorisconnectedtothegridviapower Compensation
converter. HVGSU:HighVoltagesideofGenerationStepUptransformer
Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.43 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.44

11
2/22/2009

Type1:SCIGwithVariableCompensation Type2:WoundRotorIG
FarmCollection
Point FarmCollection
GridConnection HVGSU
P i t
Point WRIG
Point Point
SCIG
TrunkLine
Gear Gear
Box
Box
GSU
Grid xfm
f
Variable
Compensation

HVGSU:HighVoltagesideofGenerationStepUptransformer
Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.45 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.46

Type3:DoublyFedInductionGenerator Type3:DFIGwithAGC
(DFIG)
WRIG
FarmCollection Gear
P i t
Point WRIG Box

Gear FarmCollection
Point
Box AC/DC+DC/AC
Pitchangle

Grid Injectedvoltage

AC/DC+DC/AC Conditions

AGC
Commands WindConditions
Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.47 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.48

12
2/22/2009

Type4:SGwithAGC PerformanceComparison

AC/DC+DC/AC Type1 & 2 Type 3 Type 4


Voltage Control Poor Better Best
FarmCollection Flicker Control Poor Better Best
Point
Excitation Low Voltage Ride-Through Poor Better Best
Pitchangle Stability Control Poor Better Best
Excitationcontrol
AGC Control Poor Better Best
Grid
Conditions
Commands
AGC
WindConditions
Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.49 Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 4.50

13

You might also like