Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1REFLECTION
PAPER 1
PAPER 2
The artifact used to demonstrate mastery of Standard 2.1 was a Multimedia Design
Project. This artifact was independently created by myself, as partial fulfillment of ITEC 7445,
Multimedia and Web Design. This artifact demonstrated mastery of the standard because it
reflects the model and facilitation of a design and implementation of technology enhanced
learning experiences aligned with student content standards and student technology standards.
The Multimedia Design Project reflected my ability to model and facilitate the design of
designed for upper elementary school students, to master the Georgia Standard of Excellence
MGSE4NBT.5b (Multiply two, two-digit numbers using strategies based on place value and
standards one, three, six, and seven, for students, were also incorporated into the WebQuest
that demonstrated mastery of how to multiple two-digit factors. Students evaluated their peers
projects and contributed valuable feedback to improve their learning experience. Students were
exposed to a variety of audio, visual, and multimedia content that worked to reinforce the
mathematics standards. Students could learn math in their own and express what they knew
The WebQuest was designed with students of diverse learning needs in mind. The
learning activities in the WebQuest provided students with disabilities, English Language
2.1 REFLECTION PAPER 32.1REFLECTION
PAPER 3
Learners, gifted students, and regular education students with the opportunity to learn in multiple
ways. Instructional strategies, such as differentiation were embedded to provide students with
multiple ways to express what they have learned. Commented [JPC2]: This section is good Im not quite
sure why it is here. Differentiation and diversity isnt a part
of this standard (although I might wish it were). Use this area
The Multimedia Design Project also reflected my ability to model and facilitate the to describe your HOW from above. Tell (briefly) how you
intentially took a standard (the one you mentioned above)
implementation of technology-enhanced learning experiences aligned with student content and talk about how the project teaches students to do that
with technology. Does that make sense? Again, dont just
tell, describe.
standards and student technology standards because the result of the project was a functional
WebQuest that students can access at any time, at any pace, and at home or school. Students can
use the WebQuest to master the multiplication of two-digit numbers and leverage technology to
communicate clearly and express their learning in multiple ways. Commented [JPC3]: This part is much better. You describe
the implementation.
I The candidate learned that the concept of accessibility must be considered at the
conceptual level of any multimedia design. The candidateI also learned that learning
experiences must take into consideration the diverse learning needs of students with disabilities,
English Language Learners, as well as gifted learners so that all students have an opportunity to
mastery state and national standards. In the process of reflecting on this project, the candidate I
probably would have used Microsoft tools to check my documents and text for accessibility. The
candidate I also would have placed Alternate Text with my graphics for those who use screen
readers. In addition, the candidate I would have presented all content in a vertical format, which
The candidate had I have yet to statistically analyze this Weebly site for its impact on
accessibility for all learners to achieve student standards and technology standards.