Professional Documents
Culture Documents
se
fen
RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-474
De
ide
ns
yI
db
Table of Contents
se
(U//FOUO) Sensitivity Originator 3
Common Acronyms and Abbreviations for MDAP Programs 4
fen
Program Information 6
Responsible Office 6
References 7
Mission and Description 8
Executive Summary 9
De
Threshold Breaches 11
Schedule 12
Performance 13
Track to Budget 14
Cost and Funding 15
ide
Cost and Funding 17
Low Rate Initial Production 23
Foreign Military Sales 24
Nuclear Costs 24
ns
Unit Cost 25
Cost Variance 28
Contracts 31
yI
se
Name: Jerry T. Slaughter, NH-04, USAF
Email: jerry.slaughter.1@us.af.mil
Phone: 937-656-5238
fen
Organization: AFLCMC/WWU, F-22 Program Office
The Aggregate Report Sensitivity has been defined as (U//FOUO) with the following explanation: Technical risks are treated
as FOUO
De
ide
ns
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
se
Acq O&M - Acquisition-Related Operations and Maintenance
ACAT - Acquisition Category
ADM - Acquisition Decision Memorandum
APB - Acquisition Program Baseline
fen
APPN - Appropriation
APUC - Average Procurement Unit Cost
$B - Billions of Dollars
BA - Budget Authority/Budget Activity
Blk - Block
De
BY - Base Year
CAPE - Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation
CARD - Cost Analysis Requirements Description
CDD - Capability Development Document
CLIN - Contract Line Item Number
CPD - Capability Production Document
ide
CY - Calendar Year
DAB - Defense Acquisition Board
DAE - Defense Acquisition Executive
DAMIR - Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval
DoD - Department of Defense
ns
DSN - Defense Switched Network
EMD - Engineering and Manufacturing Development
EVM - Earned Value Management
FOC - Full Operational Capability
yI
PB - Presidents Budget
PE - Program Element
PEO - Program Executive Officer
PM - Program Manager
se
POE - Program Office Estimate
RDT&E - Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation
SAR - Selected Acquisition Report
fen
SCP - Service Cost Position
TBD - To Be Determined
TY - Then Year
UCR - Unit Cost Reporting
U.S. - United States
De
USD(AT&L) - Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics)
ide
ns
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
Program Information
se
Program Name
F-22 Increment 3.2B Modernization (F-22 Inc 3.2B Mod)
fen
DoD Component
Air Force
De
Responsible Office
ide
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433 DSN Phone: 713-7001
DSN Fax: 986-7511
Date Assigned: July 19, 2014
anthony.genatempo@us.af.mil
ns
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
References
se
SAR Baseline (Development Estimate)
Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated June 24, 2013
fen
Approved APB
Component Acquisition Executive (CAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated March 11, 2017
De
ide
ns
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
se
The F-22s combination of stealth, supercruise, maneuverability, Intra-Flight Data Link (IFDL), sensor fusion coupled with
improved supportability provides an exponential leap in warfighting capabilities and allows full realization of operational
concepts vital to the 21st Century Air Force and joint warfighting anti-access area denial environment. As a critical
fen
component of the Global Strike Concept of Operations, the F-22 provides unmatched air-to-air and air-to-ground
capabilities.
F-22 Increment 3.2B Modernization (F-22 Inc 3.2B Mod) integrates the Air Intercept Missiles (AIM) AIM-9X and AIM-120D into
the F-22, adds Electronic Protection techniques, incorporates new hardware, enhances Geolocate capability, and expands
IFDL functionality.
De
ide
ns
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
Executive Summary
se
Program Highlights Since Last Report
The EMD effort is progressing and has resolved prior technical issues with displays and weapon bay door operations. Full
hardware qualification is complete. Developmental software coding is complete with minor clean-up activities on-going. All
fen
hardware modifications have completed on the three Developmental Test aircraft and the six Operational Test aircraft. The
last Operational Test aircraft completed modification in December 2016. Laboratory and flight tests are proceeding on
production representative hardware and with production software.
Significant Accomplishments:
De
During development flight test in late CY 2015, significant display blanking and weapon bay door anomalies were
discovered. Government / industry team root cause analysis attributed these problems to software issues, and by the end
of summer 2016 the team completed corrective actions for both anomalies. The corrective actions for both the display and
weapon bay door anomalies successfully completed developmental flight testing in March 2017, and the associated watch
items and deficiency report are closed. Display stability is now better than fleet average.
Two successful Air Intercept Missile (AIM)-9X Block II Live Fire shots were completed on November 1 and 22, 2016 and a
ide
successful AIM-120D Live Fire Shot on February 8, 2017. The Capstone Live Fire event was successfully accomplished
with simultaneous AIM-9X and AIM-120D shots on April 19, 2017.
The production Operational Flight Program (OFP) was released for flight test on March 15, 2017. A final clean-up OFP is
currently in-work with a June 20, 2017 release to flight test in support of Initial Operational Test and Evaluation scheduled to
begin August 14, 2017.
ns
The Low Rate Initial Production I and II contracts were awarded February 28, 2017. The advance procurement option for
FRP was awarded March 28, 2017.
yI
Milestone C was briefed and approved by the Service Acquisition Executive on August 2, 2016. The program is on track for
a FRP decision review in July 2018.
There are no significant software-related issues with the program at this time.
db
ta ine
Ob
se
Date Significant Development Description
December 2011 USD(AT&L) approved the Material Development Decision and designated F-22 Increment 3.2B
Modernization as a pre-MDAP for entry into the acquisition management system at Milestone B as
fen
an ACAT 1D program.
December 2012 USD(AT&L) approves the F-22 Increment 3.2B Modernization Acquisition Strategy.
June 2013 USD(AT&L) approves the Milestone B Decision and entry into EMD as an ACAT 1D program.
June 2013 The F-22 Program Office awarded the F-22 Increment 3.2B Modernization EMD contract.
De
October 2014 F-22 Increment 3.2B Modernization Developmental Test and Evaluation flight testing began.
April 2015 USD(AT&L) delegated F-22 Increment 3.2B Modernization to the Secretary of the Air Force and
designated the program as ACAT IC.
July 2015 The F-22 Program Office awarded the LRIP Advance Procurement Contract.
1st Quarter FY 2016 Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center conducted an Operational Assessment for F-22
Increment 3.2B Modernization.
ide
September 2016 The SAE approved the F-22 Increment 3.2B Modernization Milestone C Decision and entry into the
Production and Deployment Phase.
December 2016 Modifications for the 9 aircraft needed to support Initial Operational Test and Evaluation completed.
February 2017 The F-22 Program Office awarded the LRIP I and II contracts.
ns
March 2017 The SAE approved F-22 Increment 3.2B Modernization Milestone C APB.
April 2017 The Capstone Live Fire Event was successfully accomplished.
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
Threshold Breaches
se
APB Breaches
Schedule
Performance
fen
Cost RDT&E
Procurement
MILCON
Acq O&M
O&S Cost
De
Unit Cost PAUC
APUC
Nunn-McCurdy Breaches
Current UCR Baseline
ide
PAUC None
APUC None
Original UCR Baseline
PAUC None
APUC None
ns
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
Schedule
se
fen
De
Schedule Events
SAR Baseline Current APB
ide
Current
Events Development Production
Estimate
Estimate Objective/Threshold
Materiel Development Decision Dec 2011 Dec 2011 Dec 2011 Dec 2011
Milestone B Mar 2013 Jun 2013 Jun 2013 Jun 2013
ns
Milestone C Mar 2016 Aug 2016 Aug 2016 Jun 2016
Full Rate Production Jan 2018 Jul 2018 Jan 2019 Jul 2018
Required Assets Available (RAA) Mar 2019 Mar 2019 Sep 2019 Jul 2019 (Ch-1)
yI
Change Explanations
(Ch-1) The RAA current estimate changed from September 2019 to July 2019 due to schedule refinement as a result of
LRIP contract award in February 2017.
db
Notes
RAA is defined as six aircraft and associated support equipment.
ta ine
Ob
Performance
se
Performance Characteristics
SAR Baseline Current APB
Demonstrated Current
Development Production
Performance Estimate
fen
Estimate Objective/Threshold
Materiel Availability (Am)
Do not degrade aircraft Do not degrade aircraft (T=O) Do not degrade TBD Do not degrade aircraft
Am below current Am below current aircraft Am below Am below current
baseline performance. baseline performance. current baseline baseline performance.
De
Baseline performance Baseline performance performance. Baseline Baseline performance
KPP: By the end of: FY KPP: By the end of: FY performance KPP: By KPP: By the end of: FY
2011: 61.2% FY 2012: 2011: 61.2% FY 2012: the end of: FY 2011: 2011: 61.2% FY 2012:
62.6% FY 2013: 65.8% 62.6% FY 2013: 65.8% 61.2% FY 2012: 62.6% 62.6% FY 2013: 65.8%
FY 2014: 67.6% FY FY 2014: 67.6% FY FY 2013: 65.8% FY FY 2014: 67.6% FY
2015: 70.6% 2015: 70.6% 2014: 67.6% FY 2015: 2015: 70.6%
70.6%
ide
Reliability, MTBCF
Do not degrade aircraft Do not degrade aircraft (T=O) Do not degrade TBD Do not degrade aircraft
MTBCF below current MTBCF below current aircraft MTBCF below MTBCF below current
baseline performance. baseline performance. current baseline baseline performance.
performance.
ns
Weapons Integration
The F-22A shall be The F-22A shall be (T=O) The F-22A shall TBD The F-22A shall be
modified as required to modified as required to be modified as required modified as required to
yI
Requirements Reference
CPD, dated January 4, 2007, as modified by JROC Memorandum 052-11 dated April 19, 2011
ine
Change Explanations
None
ta
Track to Budget
se
RDT&E
Appn BA PE
Air Force 3600 07 0207138F
fen
Project Name
674785 F-22 (Shared) (Sunk)
Air Force 3600 07 0207163F
Project Name
De
673777 AIM-120D (Shared) (Sunk)
Air Force 3600 05 0605213F
Project Name
654785 F-22 Increment 3.2B (Shared)
Procurement
ide
Appn BA PE
Air Force 3010 06 0207138F
Line Item Name
000999 Initial Spares/Repair Parts (Shared)
ns
Air Force 3010 05 0207138F
Line Item Name
F2232B Increment 3.2B
yI
se
Cost Summary
fen
BY 2016 $M BY 2016 $M TY $M
De
Procurement 353.7 301.6 331.8 301.9 376.8 321.2 331.4
Flyaway -- -- -- 281.8 -- -- 309.2
Recurring -- -- -- 281.8 -- -- 309.2
Non Recurring -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- 0.0
Support -- -- -- 20.1 -- -- 22.2
Other Support -- -- -- 6.6 -- -- 7.3
ide
Initial Spares -- -- -- 13.5 -- -- 14.9
MILCON 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Acq O&M 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total 1607.9 1482.8 N/A 1474.1 1584.1 1460.9 1465.3
ns
Current APB Cost Estimate Reference
F-22 Increment 3.2B SCP signed by SAF/FMC, dated July 29, 2016
yI
The Base Year for the program has been updated from FY 2013 to FY 2016 using the following deflators:
Appn Category Deflation Factor
RDT&E 1.04569696
Procurement 1.04569696
db
Cost Notes
In accordance with Section 842 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2017, which amended title 10 U.S.C.
2334, the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, and the Secretary of the military department concerned
or the head of the Defense Agency concerned, must issue guidance requiring a discussion of risk, the potential impacts of
ine
risk on program costs, and approaches to mitigate risk in cost estimates for MDAPs and major subprograms. The
information required by the guidance is to be reported in each SAR. This guidance is not yet available; therefore, the
information on cost risk is not contained in this SAR.
ta
Ob
Total Quantity
SAR Baseline
Current APB
Quantity Development Current Estimate
Production
se
Estimate
RDT&E 9 9 9
Procurement 143 143 143
fen
Total 152 152 152
Quantity Notes
The unit of measure is modified aircraft.
De
ide
ns
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
se
Funding Summary
fen
Appropriation Summary
FY 2018 President's Budget / December 2016 SAR (TY$ M)
To
Appropriation Prior FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 Total
De
Complete
RDT&E 1050.0 70.3 13.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1133.9
Procurement 95.6 82.8 113.5 13.1 20.4 6.0 0.0 0.0 331.4
MILCON 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Acq O&M 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
PB 2018 Total 1145.6 153.1 127.1 13.1 20.4 6.0 0.0 0.0 1465.3
ide
PB 2017 Total 1183.9 153.1 151.4 13.1 20.4 20.7 0.0 0.0 1542.6
Delta -38.3 0.0 -24.3 0.0 0.0 -14.7 0.0 0.0 -77.3
Quantity Summary
ns
FY 2018 President's Budget / December 2016 SAR (TY$ M)
FY FY FY FY FY FY To
Quantity Undistributed Prior Total
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Complete
yI
Development 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
Production 0 35 36 72 0 0 0 0 0 143
PB 2018 Total 9 35 36 72 0 0 0 0 0 152
PB 2017 Total 9 35 36 72 0 0 0 0 0 152
Delta 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
db
ta ine
Ob
se
Annual Funding By Appropriation
Annual Funding
fen
3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force
TY $M
De
Flyaway
2004 -- -- -- -- -- -- 6.4
2005 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2006 -- -- -- -- -- -- 16.5
2007 -- -- -- -- -- -- 33.0
2008 -- -- -- -- -- -- 31.4
ide
2009 -- -- -- -- -- -- 40.8
2010 -- -- -- -- -- -- 131.0
2011 -- -- -- -- -- -- 129.5
2012 -- -- -- -- -- -- 127.5
2013 -- -- -- -- -- -- 129.0
ns
2014 -- -- -- -- -- -- 109.1
2015 -- -- -- -- -- -- 180.2
2016 -- -- -- -- -- -- 115.6
2017 -- -- -- -- -- -- 70.3
yI
2018 -- -- -- -- -- -- 13.6
Subtotal 9 -- -- -- -- -- 1133.9
db
ta ine
Ob
Annual Funding
3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force
se
BY 2016 $M
fen
Flyaway Flyaway
Flyaway
2004 -- -- -- -- -- -- 7.9
2005 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2006 -- -- -- -- -- -- 19.2
2007 -- -- -- -- -- -- 37.4
De
2008 -- -- -- -- -- -- 34.9
2009 -- -- -- -- -- -- 44.7
2010 -- -- -- -- -- -- 141.7
2011 -- -- -- -- -- -- 137.6
2012 -- -- -- -- -- -- 133.1
2013 -- -- -- -- -- -- 132.4
ide
2014 -- -- -- -- -- -- 110.5
2015 -- -- -- -- -- -- 180.7
2016 -- -- -- -- -- -- 114.2
2017 -- -- -- -- -- -- 65.5
2018 -- -- -- -- -- -- 12.4
ns
Subtotal 9 -- -- -- -- -- 1172.2
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
Annual Funding
3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
se
TY $M
fen
Flyaway Flyaway
Flyaway
2015 -- 28.5 -- -- 28.5 -- 28.5
2016 35 62.1 -- -- 62.1 5.0 67.1
2017 36 76.8 -- -- 76.8 6.0 82.8
2018 72 102.8 -- -- 102.8 10.7 113.5
De
2019 -- 13.0 -- -- 13.0 0.1 13.1
2020 -- 20.0 -- -- 20.0 0.4 20.4
2021 -- 6.0 -- -- 6.0 -- 6.0
Subtotal 143 309.2 -- -- 309.2 22.2 331.4
ide
ns
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
Annual Funding
3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
se
BY 2016 $M
fen
Flyaway Flyaway
Flyaway
2015 -- 27.9 -- -- 27.9 -- 27.9
2016 35 59.6 -- -- 59.6 4.8 64.4
2017 36 69.6 -- -- 69.6 5.4 75.0
2018 72 91.3 -- -- 91.3 9.5 100.8
De
2019 -- 11.3 -- -- 11.3 0.1 11.4
2020 -- 17.1 -- -- 17.1 0.3 17.4
2021 -- 5.0 -- -- 5.0 -- 5.0
Subtotal 143 281.8 -- -- 281.8 20.1 301.9
ide
ns
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
se
End Item
Recurring
Fiscal Flyaway
Quantity
Year (Aligned With
fen
Quantity)
BY 2016 $M
2015 -- --
2016 35 69.0
2017 36 70.9
De
2018 72 141.9
2019 -- --
2020 -- --
2021 -- --
Subtotal 143 281.8
ide
ns
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
se
Item Initial LRIP Decision Current Total LRIP
Approval Date 6/26/2013 6/26/2013
Approved Quantity 71 71
fen
Reference Milestone B ADM Milestone B ADM
Start Year 2016 2016
End Year 2017 2017
De
The Current Total LRIP Quantity is more than 10% of the total production quantity due to an opportunity to capture economic
order quantity efficiencies. This strategy was approved as part of the Milestone B review.
ide
ns
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
se
None
fen
Nuclear Costs
None
De
ide
ns
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
Unit Cost
se
Current UCR Baseline and Current Estimate (Base-Year Dollars)
BY 2016 $M BY 2016 $M
fen
Baseline
(Dec 2016 SAR)
(Mar 2017 APB)
Program Acquisition Unit Cost
Cost 1482.8 1474.1
Quantity 152 152
De
Unit Cost 9.755 9.698 -0.58
Average Procurement Unit Cost
Cost 301.6 301.9
Quantity 143 143
Unit Cost 2.109 2.111 +0.09
ide
Original UCR Baseline and Current Estimate (Base-Year Dollars)
BY 2016 $M BY 2016 $M
se
fen
De
ide
APB Unit Cost History
BY 2016 $M TY $M
Item Date
PAUC APUC PAUC APUC
Original APB Jun 2013 10.651 2.490 10.422 2.635
APB as of January 2006 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
ns
Revised Original APB N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Prior APB Jun 2013 10.651 2.490 10.422 2.635
Current APB Mar 2017 9.755 2.109 9.611 2.246
Prior Annual SAR Dec 2015 10.401 2.543 10.149 2.685
yI
10.422 0.136 0.000 0.000 0.000 -0.908 0.000 -0.010 -0.782 9.640
Development Current
Estimate Econ Qty Sch Eng Est Oth Spt Total Estimate
2.635 0.094 0.000 0.000 0.000 -0.401 0.000 -0.010 -0.317 2.317
Ob
se
Item Planning Development Production
Estimate
Estimate Estimate Estimate
Milestone A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Milestone B N/A Mar 2013 N/A Jun 2013
fen
Milestone C N/A Mar 2016 N/A Jun 2016
RAA N/A Mar 2019 N/A Jul 2019
Total Cost (TY $M) N/A 1584.1 N/A 1465.3
Total Quantity N/A 152 N/A 152
PAUC N/A 10.422 N/A 9.640
De
ide
ns
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
Cost Variance
se
Summary TY $M
Item RDT&E Procurement MILCON Total
SAR Baseline (Development 1207.3 376.8 -- 1584.1
fen
Estimate)
Previous Changes
Economic -4.0 -1.5 -- -5.5
Quantity -- -- -- --
Schedule -- -- -- --
Engineering -- -- -- --
De
Estimating -44.7 +9.4 -- -35.3
Other -- -- -- --
Support -- -0.7 -- -0.7
Subtotal -48.7 +7.2 -- -41.5
Current Changes
Economic +11.3 +14.9 -- +26.2
ide
Quantity -- -- -- --
Schedule -- -- -- --
Engineering -- -- -- --
Estimating -36.0 -66.7 -- -102.7
Other -- -- -- --
ns
Support -- -0.8 -- -0.8
Subtotal -24.7 -52.6 -- -77.3
Adjustments -- -- -- --
yI
Summary BY 2016 $M
Item RDT&E Procurement MILCON Total
se
SAR Baseline (Development 1254.2 353.7 -- 1607.9
Estimate)
Previous Changes
Economic -- -- -- --
fen
Quantity -- -- -- --
Schedule -- -- -- --
Engineering -- -- -- --
Estimating -45.2 +7.7 -- -37.5
Other -- -- -- --
De
Support -- -0.3 -- -0.3
Subtotal -45.2 +7.4 -- -37.8
Current Changes
Economic -- -- -- --
Quantity -- -- -- --
Schedule -- -- -- --
ide
Engineering -- -- -- --
Estimating -36.8 -58.3 -- -95.1
Other -- -- -- --
Support -- -0.9 -- -0.9
Subtotal -36.8 -59.2 -- -96.0
ns
Adjustments -- -- -- --
Total Changes -82.0 -51.8 -- -133.8
CE - Cost Variance 1172.2 301.9 -- 1474.1
CE - Cost & Funding 1172.2 301.9 -- 1474.1
yI
RDT&E $M
se
Base Then
Current Change Explanations
Year Year
Revised escalation indices. (Economic) N/A +11.3
fen
Revised estimate to align to the Milestone C SCP dated August 2016 which decreased the -19.8 -18.9
estimate from the Milestone B SCP due to unrealized test risk. (Estimating)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating) -11.3 -11.3
Revised estimate due to the inadvertent addition of funding in FY 2016. (Estimating) -5.7 -5.8
RDT&E Subtotal -36.8 -24.7
De
Procurement $M
Base Then
Current Change Explanations
Year Year
Revised escalation indices. (Economic) N/A +14.9
Revised estimate to align to the Milestone C SCP dated August 2016 which decreased the -54.3 -62.3
ide
estimate from the Milestone B SCP due to unrealized program risk. (Estimating)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating) -4.0 -4.4
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Support) -0.3 -0.3
Decrease in Other Support due to application of new outyear inflation indices. (Support) -0.2 -0.1
Decrease in Initial Spares due to application of new outyear inflation indices. (Support) -0.4 -0.4
ns
Procurement Subtotal -59.2 -52.6
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
Contracts
se
Contract Identification
Appropriation: RDT&E
Contract Name: F-22 Mod, DO 0004 REDI II, Incr 3.2B Ph C&D
fen
Contractor: Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Contractor Location: 1 Lockheed Blvd
Ft. Worth, TX 76108-3619
Contract Number: FA8611-13-D-2850/3
Contract Type: Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF)
De
Award Date: June 26, 2013
Definitization Date: June 26, 2013
Contract Price
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
ide
Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
328.8 N/A 9 344.9 N/A 9 290.3 328.9
Contract Modification 000412 added ECP 0661 - Addition of 7th Dual Computing Engine (DuCE) and Global Inertial
Navigation System (GINS) 09 to Increment 3.2B; as a result, the Delivery Order (DO) 0004 price increased by $.9M.
yI
Contract Modification 000417 added CCP 438 - Credit for stop work of maintenance training courseware activities; as a
result, the DO 0004 price decreased by $.3M.
Contract Modification 000419 added CCP 0452 - Partial stop work and addition of new work due to Air Force Operational
db
Test and Evaluation Center (AFOTEC) providing new threat model requirements beyond the scope of DO 0004 and deleted
threat model requirements previously identified; as a result, the DO 0004 price increased by $3.1M.
The total net value of DO 0004 contract changes in CY2016 amount to $16.1M.
ine
Contract Variance
Item Cost Variance Schedule Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date (2/28/2017) -27.1 -3.1
ta
se
Combat Simulator threat data base. The value is still to be negotiated.
The favorable net change in the schedule variance is due to the pending target cost adjustment to reflect the new Budget at
Completion.
fen
De
ide
ns
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
Contract Identification
Appropriation: RDT&E
Contract Name: D.O. 009 Test Execution CLIN 0301
se
Contractor: Lockheed Martin (Aeronautics)
Contractor Location: 1 Lockheed Blvd
Ft. Worth, TX 76108-3619
fen
Contract Number: FA8611-13-D-2850/4
Contract Type: Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF)
Award Date: January 01, 2015
Definitization Date: January 01, 2015
De
Contract Price
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
54.6 N/A N/A 57.1 N/A N/A 54.6 54.6
ide
Target Price Change Explanation
The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to Modification 25
increasing the ceiling of CLIN 0301 in the amount of $2.5M.
Contract Variance
ns
Item Cost Variance Schedule Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/27/2015) +2.2 -0.5
Previous Cumulative Variances +2.2 -0.5
yI
Notes
This effort is for 3.2B System Integration and Test efforts only; there are no quantities to be delivered
ine
This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract.
ta
Ob
Contract Identification
Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name: Increment 3.2B Production
se
Contractor: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Contractor Location: 1 Lockheed Blvd
Fort Worth, TX 76108-3619
fen
Contract Number: FA8611-13-D-2850/5
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price (FFP)
Award Date: July 22, 2015
Definitization Date: July 22, 2015
De
Contract Price
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
20.4 N/A 0 145.7 N/A 71 145.7 145.7
ide
Target Price Change Explanation
The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to to multiple
modifications for Advance Procurement for EMD, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources, and Processor Interface Control and
Communication 3 for $7.6M, the awards on February 28, 2017 of 3.2B Production and Deployment LRIPs I and II in the
amount of $114.3M, and the award on March 28, 2017 of Advance Procurement for Production in the amount of $3.4M.
ns
Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations
Cost and Schedule Variance reporting is not required on this (FFP) contract.
yI
Notes
This is the first time this contract is being reported.
db
ta ine
Ob
se
Deliveries
Percent
Delivered to Date Planned to Date Actual to Date Total Quantity
Delivered
fen
Development 9 9 9 100.00%
Production 0 0 143 0.00%
Total Program Quantity Delivered 9 9 152 5.92%
De
Total Acquisition Cost 1465.3 Years Appropriated 14
Expended to Date 1073.5 Percent Years Appropriated 77.78%
Percent Expended 73.26% Appropriated to Date 1298.7
Total Funding Years 18 Percent Appropriated 88.63%
ide
Total funding years reflect development executed in support of the F-22 Inc 3.2B Mod program. Beginning in FY 2011 the
program was rescoped into smaller increments of capability (e.g. 3.2A, 3.2B) to adjust to financial constraints, facilitate
improved baseline control/management, and meet capability delivery needs. F-22 Inc 3.2B Mod officially started in FY 2013
with approval of Milestone B.
ns
LRIP I deliveries are expected to begin in April 2019.
yI
db
ta ine
Ob
se
Cost Estimate Details
Date of Estimate: July 29, 2016
Source of Estimate: SCP
fen
Quantity to Sustain: 149
Unit of Measure: Modified Aircraft
Service Life per Unit: 33.00 Years
Fiscal Years in Service: FY 2018 - FY 2051
De
The F-22 Inc 3.2B Mod is a capability upgrade modification program. The program will modify 152 F-22A aircraft (9
RDT&E and 143 Procurement). Of the 152 aircraft, 3 are development test assets, and 149 will be sustained with O&S
funds.
Sustainment Strategy
Given the low hardware risk of the F-22 Inc 3.2B Mod upgrade, sustainment requirements will be managed within the
ide
baseline F-22 sustainment concept with minimal impact on O&S cost estimates or achievement of materiel availability
goals. The F-22 sustainment strategy is to sustain F-22 readiness and availability at the lowest cost over the life of the
weapon system. The F-22 sustainment strategy employs Performance-Based Logistics contracts with Public/Private
Partnering for depot repair capabilities to meet Air Force Core requirements.
ns
Antecedent Information
No Antecedent
se
No Antecedent
Current Production APB (Antecedent)
Current Estimate
Objective/Threshold
Base Year 180.0 198.0 180.0 N/A
fen
Then Year 260.9 N/A 0.0 N/A
The F-22 Inc 3.2B Mod O&S costs will not be tracked separately as directed by the June 26, 2013 ADM.
F-22A Modernization Increment 3.2B O&S cost estimate from the Milestone C SCP is $180M (BY 2016), $260.9M (TY).
The total life cycle cost estimate for the F-22A system is $96.3B (BY 2016$). The service life of the F-22 system was
increased from 15 years to 33 years per modified aircraft.
De
The Air Force expects F-22 Inc 3.2B Mod O&S costs to be budgeted in the baseline F-22 PE (27138F) and expended
along with baseline program O&S funds, so the PAA value used in the calculation includes all F-22s, not just the aircraft
receiving the Inc 3.2B modification.
Costs are applied for the years 2018 (1st modified aircraft is fielded) through 2051 (33 years).
$M
Prior SAR Total O&S Estimates - Dec 80.9
2015 SAR
Programmatic/Planning Factors 99.1 The service life of the F-22A system was increased from
15 years to 33 years per modified aircraft.
ine
Other 0.0
Total Changes 99.1
Current Estimate 180.0
Ob
Date of Estimate:
Source of Estimate:
Disposal/Demilitarization Total Cost (BY 2016 $M):
se
Disposal costs for this modification are included in the F-22 platform.
fen
De
ide
ns
yI
db
ta ine
Ob