Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KEVIN REYNOLDS
LEGAL COUNSEL
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
By letter dated July 19, 2017, Frank Rubino filed a complaint pursuant to Article V of the
State Party Rules alleging that the Derby Town Committee (DTC) improperly conducted its
The Dispute Resolution Hearing was held on July 22, 2017 by telephone. Serving on the
Dispute Resolution Panel were: Barbara Reynolds of District 26, Tony Duarte of District 3, and
Tom McDonough of District 16. At the hearing, Andrew McIndoo appeared on behalf of the
Complainant. The DTC Chair Linda Fusco appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Carmen
DiCenso, who received the endorsement for Mayor at the July 19th DTC meeting, also
participated.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
The facts in this matter are not in dispute. On July 19th, the DTC voted to endorse Mr.
DiCenso for Mayor. Mr. DiCenso received 21 votes and Mayor Anita Dugatto received 15
votes. The vote was by secret ballot. There was no challenge to the voting process and the
meeting adjourned with the endorsement of Mr. DiCenso for Mayor. Supporters of Mayor
Dugatto left concerned about the use of secret ballot and contacted the State Party the following
day.
Mr. Rubino challenged the endorsement pursuant to Article V of the State Party Rules
DISCUSSION
Article VII, Section 8 of the State Party Rules, entitled Rules Governing the Democratic
In accordance with the Charter of the Democratic National Committee, all meetings
of Democratic town committees, subcommittees and all other Democratic Party
committees shall be open to the public, and votes shall not be taken by secret ballot.
The reason behind this rule is that when you cast your ballot in a representative capacity, such as
a town committee member or a delegate, those who elected you have the right to know how you
voted. This is in contrast to when you cast a vote as an individual Democrat such as at a caucus.
When you participate in a caucus as a member of the Democratic Party, you have the right to
DTC Chair Fusco acknowledged that the town committee erred by not following Article
VII, Section 8 and took full responsibility. The Panel recognizes that Chair Fusco was following
the established tradition in Derby by holding a secret ballot and notes that she did not seek to
help one side over the other. Chair Fusco was very forthright at the hearing.
Having determined that a violation occurred, the Panel concludes that the proper remedy
is to vacate the endorsement of Mr. DiCenso. This is not to suggest that the open ballot process
would have changed the outcome. It is simply a recognition that an endorsement that is the
The next question facing the Panel is whether to order a new vote by the DTC under the
appropriate process. This is not a simple question. Selecting a new date injects a great
uncertainty into the equation. Unlike the July 19th meeting which was set with ample notice to
all members of the DTC, a new meeting would have to take place quite soon in order to conform
to the election deadlines. Which town committee members would be able to make the new date?
\Would the outcome of the July 19th meeting influence members one way or the other? Would
the delay in endorsing a candidate affect whether there is a primary or the campaign for the
primary?
Weighing these and other factors, the Panel determines that it would be most appropriate
to vacate the DTCs endorsement and recommend that both candidates gather petitions to qualify
CONCLUSION
The Panel unanimously vacates the mayoral endorsement by the DTC because the vote
improperly was by secret ballot. The Panel also directs the DTC to amend its local rules to
comply with Article VII, Section 8 and prohibit the use of a secret ballot when voting in a
representative capacity.