Professional Documents
Culture Documents
in an Enterprise
Environment
Best Practices to Managing Quality Processes
1 2 3 4 5
Quality Benefits
IT System
Introduction System of EQMS Resources
Challenges
Processes Implementation
Introduction
Organizations have increased their global presence by entering new markets, outsourcing
to global suppliers and contract manufacturers, and through mergers and acquisitions. This
offers competitive advantages but also increases risk due to the lack of visibility of quality
processes across the value chain.
As a result, industries have seen considerable increases in product recalls, which has increased
regulatory attention and requirements. Increases in rework, disposals and scrap attributed
to poor quality also increased cost and reduced profitability for companies in an already
struggling economy.
While companies in the life sciences industry have leveraged Enterprise Quality Management
Systems (EQMS) for the last 20 years, 80% of quality managers in consumer products (i.e. food,
beverage, personal care, cosmetics, baby products and tobacco) and chemical companies are
still managing quality processes using spreadsheet and paper-based systems.*
Companies have spent years trying to find ways to use existing enterprise IT systems to
manage quality processes, with a big assumption that their ERP system can be extended to
handle it.
This eBook will highlight trends in both the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and quality
management systems, as well as discuss key issues that should be considered by those
looking to better manage quality across the enterprise..
*Transforming Quality Management through Automation, Quality Digest. January 23, 2012
3
The total cost of ownership becomes extremely high due to the cost of each upgrade
which includes the redesign of custom objects and almost a full revalidation of the system.
While that seems like a positive for ERP vendors from a license and professional services
revenue standpoint, but it actually ends up putting incumbent vendors in a full competitive
evaluation process during each upgrade. More frequently, this trend and refocused
perspective are driving organizations away from the view that ERP platforms are a one-size-
fits-all solution.
1 Avons Failed SAP Implementation Reflects Rise of Usability, The Wall
*Panorama Consulting Solutions, 2014 ERP Report. Street Journal, January 24, 2014
2 Identifying Critical Issues in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
Implementation Elsevier. May 2005.
4
These systems not only span the broad spectrum of highly interrelated quality
systems processes, but also involve the participation of cross-functional
groups within the organization. The evolution of these systems has also
resulted in expansion well beyond manufacturing quality systems processes,
and in many cases these systems are now extensively used by regulatory
affairs groups, lab operations, clinical operations and even, increasingly,
environmental health and safety staff.
During the manufacturing process, there are a variety of deviations that can occur against a particular batch or lot number within the ERP system. However,
these systems typically work in a batch-centric fashion, where a deviation is associated with a specific batch. So, when the total quality process, such as an
incidents, is reviewed, business users can see that upto 90% of the quality process is done manually outside the ERP system.
This is different than a typical quality management system, which manages business processes via an incident-centric fashion. So, significant customization of
an ERP system is normally required to permit a single deviation to be associated with multiple batches or products, unlike a quality management system that is a
purpose-built solution.
For those that choose not to engage in customization, resource-intensive manual processes susceptible to errors are developed instead.
The implementation model for these systems is consistent with the approach taken in a broad range of ERP-related deployments. These are typically large-scale
professional services engagements involving significant customization to enable the ERP to conform to the customer-specific product and quality process
requirements. Even for a mid-tier company, this isolated component of the overall quality systems landscape can cost several million dollars, easily equaling or
exceeding the price of implementation of a complete, best-of-breed quality management system.
CAPAs
Nonconformances and product complaints are increasingly cross-referenced to both materials and the suppliers that had 51%
reduc*on
provided them, allowing true aggregation of all supplier-related quality information. in
CAPA
cycle
*me
From a manufacturing perspective, there are a number of different product and operational incidents that must
51%
be captured. After the logging of these incidents, a thorough investigation must be conducted, followed by the
identification of root cause and the planning and execution of corrective and preventive actions (CAPAs). To allow
accurate closure, a disciplined process must be put in place to check the effectiveness of the remediation activities to Incidents
&
Nonconformances
make sure the issue doesnt recur in the future. 72%
reduc*on
in
72 incident
%
process
cycle
*me
Quality Manager,
The EQMS does not end at the manufacturing of the product. It extends post-market to the intake
and investigation of consumer product complaints. Issues identified in the field must follow the Hologic
same regimented investigation, root-cause analysis and CAPA process as the earlier-mentioned
pre-market incidents and deviations.
Although this provides some details on an EQMS, each individual organization will have scope
variations and business-process details unique to both their operations and the products they are
manufacturing. As the functionality and benefits of an EQMS are identified, it becomes clear that
they go beyond simply tracking a batch process as in a transactional ERP system.
ERP Integration
initiation nonconformances
Enterprise Bus
The most prevalent EQMS integration is the exposure of master data from the ERP. This data LIMS PLM
Automated initiation Engineering change order
typically includes material master information, product information and vendor information to of lab investigations Document access
There are multiple integration strategies from a technology perspective, ranging from more Quality Management
System
legacy batch processes all the way to real-time web services.
Real-time data push: Product issues are logged and affected lots/batches are identified in
real-time, so the EQMS can trigger an alert to the ERP system to quarantine or flag appropriate products.
n-demand data pull: When the data is needed, the ERP system performs an in-bound inquiry into the EQMS requesting to identify any open product issues
O
that should prevent product from being released.
E QMS-managed release: In environments with legacy or limited ERP deployments, the EQMS can manage release criteria and bridge together product-related
quality information.
With todays complex IT environments, an EQMS can provide a flexible integration capability that can successfully interconnect many legacy systems while
ensuring a consistent, transparent quality management process. In addition, web services and cloud-based capabilities allow multiple integration points to be
put in place in a diverse environment at manageable cost and effort.
10
MES Integration
In organizations utilizing manufacturing execution systems (MES), product nonconformities can be identified in real time as a function of shop-floor auto-
mation. An element of efficiency will be achieved from the establishment of an automated inbound integration with the EQMS to allow product nonconfor-
mities to be automatically initiated, leading to immediate product containment, investigation and corrective activity.
LIMS Integration
Potential material or product issues can be identified through routine laboratory testing activities. The results from this lab testing are stored within
laboratory information management systems (LIMS) and nonconforming results are identified. At the point of identification, a LIMS application can
automatically initiate a lab investigation process within the EQMS, transferring the appropriate identifying information. The nonconforming lab result will be
investigated through a structured process resulting in a decision on the status of the product nonconformity and if corrective action is needed. Following
the conclusion of the investigation, the EQMS will perform an outbound communication to the LIMS so the results are clearly visible to those in the lab.
Additionally, comprehensive enterprise applications such as Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) and Document Management systems can be integrated
with an EQMS, creating enhanced visibility through out the quality workflows.
11
Organizations will achieve the most effective holistic quality system with the fastest time-to-value and time-to-productivity for their investment using an
EQMS with the appropriate integration with their other existing enterprise systems.
In summary:
Implementing an EQMS helps avoid costly and complex customization of ERP systems and other peripheral applications.
anufacturing organizations can achieve powerful visibility and traceability with the highest level of efficiency across the broad scope of quality systems
M
processes are with an EQMS, avoiding the pitfalls of when functions are spread across multiple applications and/or across manual processes.
n EQMS can serve as a powerful bridging point for quality management in organizations that have been engaged in mergers and acquisitions, effectively
A
interconnecting diverse and global enterprise application environments.
An EQMS is incident-centric and allows the appropriate impact and assessment tracking expected in a GxP and ISO environments.
n EQMS provides a proven solution to managing regulatory and compliance requirements according to FDA, USDA, EU Directives and Asia and Latin
A
America requirements.
rganizations can gain a faster return on investment and lower total cost of ownership will be gained by leveraging purpose-built EQMS solutions rather
O
than customized ERP-based solutions.
12
13
Global Headquarters
2000 Waterview Drive
Hamilton, NJ 08691
(609) 807-5100
(888) 261-5948
info@spartasystems.com
European Offices
Berlin | London | Tel Aviv | Vienna
europe-info@spartasystems.com
www.spartasystems.com
http://blog.spartasystems.com