Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Caitlin McDonnell
Introduction to Philosophy
Perhaps one of the biggest arguments with the existence of God is the problem of evil.
The problem of evil can best be described by saying, If God can prevent the suffering of the
innocent, yet chooses not to, He is not good. If God chooses to prevent the suffering, but cannot,
He is not omnipotent. If God cannot recognize the suffering of the innocent, He is not wise
(Soccio 239). This statement is suggesting that if God exists, then why does he not prevent
suffering if he is the creator of it and is able to? St. Thomas Aquinas, among other philosophers
have written articles to support Gods existence and to disclaim it. However, all these questions
The best way to begin to answer the question of the problem of evil, is to first prove the
existence of God. Matt Slick wrote an article called Is belief in God rational? In this article, he
claims Ultimately, if God exists then belief in him is ration. If he does not exist, then it isnt.
Likewise, if he does not exist then not believing in him is supremely irrational. So, it comes
down to whether or not God exists. Does he? Of course he does. One person who's claims
would be able to support this statement is St. Thomas Aquinas. St. Thomas Aquinas was an
Italian Dominican friar and Catholic priest who was an immensely influential philosopher and
theologian. He combined the theological principles of faith with the philosophical principles of
reason and was ranked one of the most influential thinkers of the medieval Scholasticism. St.
Thomas believed in God, however he also though Gods existence could be demonstrated by
natural reason (230). He created five proofs for the existence of God which all follow a basic
2
pattern. The Five Ways are cause-effect arguments, beginning with our experience of effects
The First Way in the Five Ways is the argument from motion meaning both linear motion
and more complex life-motion, animating motion. The argument of motion is an attempt to
prove the existence of God based on the reasoning that to avoid an infinite regress, there must be
an Unmoved Mover capable of imparting motion to all other things Aristotelian argument that
forms the basis for the first of Thomas Aquinass Five Ways (230). As a result of things already
being in motion, we know that something had to cause this object that was not yet in motion to
become and object in motion. St. Thomas reasoned that some first mover had to exist outside
The Second Way is cause which is based on the Aristotelian concept of cause which talks
about the initial cause of the existence of the universe. The cosmological argument is from the
Greek word cosmos, meaning world, universe, or orderly structure; argument for the
existence of God that because it is impossible for any natural thing to be the complete and
sufficient source of its own existence, there must be an Uncaused Cause capable of imparting
existence to all other things; Aristotelian argument that forms the basis for the second of
Aquinass Five Ways (232). This suggests that it is impossible for anything to exist with out a
previous cause. In order to cause itself, a thing would have t pride itself. However, God always
was, is and will be. This is a way to state that God was the first efficient cause, that nothing
The Third Way is necessity. The argument of necessity is the argument for the
existence of God based on the idea that if nothing had ever existed, nothing would always exist;
there fore, there is something whose existence is necessary (an eternal something) (233).
3
Humans exist given the particular history of the world. Our existence is contingent on something
else. As a result of this Thomas said that If nothing had ever existed, nothing would always
The Forth Way is degree. Degree also comes into play when explaining the existence of a
good and loving being thus relating to the problem of evil. The argument of gradation is based on
a metaphysical concept of a hierarchy of souls. It is based on the idea that being progresses
qualitatively uniq God: (234). Thomas bases this off of the great chain of being which was
created by a philosopher named Arthur O. Lovejoy. Thomas though it was reflected in the
properties of individual things, as well as in the kinds of things that exists. It ranges from
complete lack goodness or evil and goes all the way to pure goodness which is God. God is the
cause of all our being, goodness and every other perfection therefore, he is the greatest in truth
The final way is The Fifth Way which is design (also known as teleological argument). It
is a widely known argument for the existence of God claims that the universe manifests order
and purpose that can only be result of a conscious intelligence (God) (236). Thomas argued that
order implies intelligence, purpose and plan; starting with the common observations and
searching for principles to explain them. The world exhibits evidence of design, it follows
logically that there must be a designer. Thomas suggested that if something lacks knowledge, it
cannot move towards and end unless it is directed by some being with knowledge and
To me, St. Thomas offers a clear, concise explanation for the existence of God. However,
none of these ways truly explain why there is an existence of evil if God is so great. B.C Johnson
4
wrote and essay asking why God does not intervene to prevent evil. As a Catholic, it was rather
hard for me to get through is essay, although I did agree with some of his statements. Johnson
began with an example of an infant in a burning building asking why God did not intervene to
save that child. Johnson said that every action successfully performed must in the end be good
and therefore the right thing to do, other wise God would not have allowed it to happen.
However, he goes on to say that this argument does not explain why God allowed the child to
burn to death.
From Johnsons writings, it seems to me that the only way to prove God exists is for him
to eliminate the evil in this world and to be able to intervene when such evil happens. Every
excuse we could provide to make the world consistent with a good God can be paralleled by an
excuse to make the world consistent with an evil God. This is so because the world is a mixture
of both good and bad (Johnson). However, what he fails to mention, that John Hick does is, His
only son suffered. The climax of this history of evil is the crucifixion of Jesus, which is
presented not only as a case of utterly unjust suffering, but as the violent and murderous rejection
of Gods Messiah (Hicks). The Bible does not really drop many hints as to why God allowed
this to happen, except that Jesus died to save us from our sins. God willed and ordained the
weakness of the cross of Christ from all eternity as a demonstration of His goodness, love, and
mercy. Evil has not been set there by God, but represents the distortion of something that is
inherently valuable Evil is essentially parasitic upon good, being disorder and perversion in a
There is no greater demonstration of God's love! (1 John 4:9-10). God shares each and all
of our sufferings. Rather than looking at someone dying as a bad thing, we could look at it as a
beautiful thing. Perhaps they are at peace now and are going on to the afterlife. In relation to the
5
crucifixion of Christ, At the cross of Christ, God's greatness, God's goodness, and the reality of
evil co-exist without diminishing or modifying any one of these truths. God sovereignly ordains
and overrules all events surrounding the cross; God reveals His love, mercy and goodness
through the cross; all the while, Christ's crucifixion remains a result of real human evil and
injustice (Vincent). Richard Vincent is saying that although there are these harsh evils in the
world, they are actually an act of Gods love. Some might argue that mass shootings and natural
disasters are not a result of Gods love. John Hicks offers a suggestion to this saying For we can
never provide a complete casual explanation of a free act; if we could, it would not be a free act.
The origin of moral evil lies forever concealed within the mystery of human freedom.
As a result of the arguments that people present about the problem of evil and presenting
the question of If there is evil, how can you prove God exists?, I feel as though a combination
of St. Thomas Aquinass Five Ways and John Hicks article do a great job of elaborating on how
God can exist and give reasoning behind the problem of evil. It is clear that God truly exists and
that as a result of him creating us with free will, there is evil in the world. One of John Hicks
final quotations is Man has been made as a person in the image of God but has not yet been
brought as a free and responsible agent into the finite likeness of God, which is revealed through
Christ.
Works Cited
Hick, John. "There Is a Reason Why God Allows Evil." Philosophy of Religion (1963): n. pag.
Web.
Johnson, B.C. "Why Doesn't God Intervene to Prevent Evil?" The Atheist Debater's Handbook
Matt, Slick. "Is Belief in God Rational?" CARM. Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry,
Soccio, Douglas. "Chapter 8: Thomas Aquinas." Archetypes of Wisdom. 8th ed. Boston:
Vincent, Richard. "The Problem of Evil and the Cross of Christ." Suffering. Unknown, 1 Sept.