Professional Documents
Culture Documents
,____
___I
Synopsis: EC to open and assign case tol
L...-. ____ _____.
L------....-----,-..,.....----.---.-----,,----,-......-.,.....----,,----,-.-----'
I Website administrators
logged the attack and stated that they were in possession of logs
for days prior to the attack.
To: Los Angeles From: Los Angeles
Re: 288A-LA-241135, 03/29/2005
.L--
........
---------,,----____.lstated that he would collect loss
figures caused by the DOS to provide to the FBI .
b6
b7C
2
~
(Rev. 01-31-2003)
FEDERAL
BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 03/29/2005
Title: UB(s);
Chu h of Scientology - Victim;
DDOS
00:LA
I
Synopsis:
I
EC to open and assign ______
__.
andD
Details: On Saturday, 03/26/2005, the Ch cb-Gf~~S
website, www.scientology.org, (192.216.201. ) came under a denial
of service (DOS) attack. The attack started at approximately
12:15 p.m. and lasted for about six hours ___ e target web server
is connected to the Internet by a Tl line. Tne Tl line also
serves about nine other web servers, to include Dianetics.com.
The Scientology online book store is also served off of the same
Tl line. All 10 web servers were not accessible to the public
Internet due to the flooding of the bandwidth of the Tl line.
~-
Fountain Avenue, os Angeles,
The information
Cal
in this
orn1a,
To:
Re:
Los Angeles
288A-LA-241135,
~'m: Los Angeles
03/29/2005
._ __________ lean also be reached on his mobile phone number
2
ALL IMFOPHAT IOM Com AINED
HEPEIM IS UNCLASSIF IED
(Rev. 01-31-2003) DATE 11- 02- 2007 BY 60324 AUC BAliJ/STP/CLS
._________
attac
_. In a 1t1on,
were not provided
loss figures
by the victim
resulting
company.
from the DOS
Due to the
above, the FBI is closing this case.
(Rev. 01-31-2003)
Title: UNSUB(s);
Church of Scientology - Victim;
DDOS
00:LA
--------------------------------------------- ...
1,"'I
(Rev. 06-04-2007)
Drafted By:
1.I .....I'~
I ____.~ b6
b7C
I ,?
To:
Re:
Cyber From:
288A-LA-249816, Los Angeles
01/31/2008
LEAD (s) :
CYBER
AT WASHINGTON,D.C.
Read and clear .
2
U.S. Department of Justice
25 February 2008
b6
b7C
b7D
De~.___ _____.
On 18 January 2008, a distributed denial of service attack was conducted against the
Church of Scientology website. FBI investigationdetermined that the hackers utilized the
website Gigaloader.com to conduct this attack. The Los Angeles Division of the FBI recently
served a subpoena tol I
1------------------J.l lwu:.hwi~chl.l-.lalthwe"""n1..,1fo~rwl.L.l&Man-,ed
the subpoena to the b3
After consultin with the Los Angeles based case agent, it became clear how the
b3
subpoen The case a ent also advised tha had contacted him
via tele hone and indicated that b6
b7C
REQUEST OF b7D
b6
b7 C
b7 D
b7D
Please direct your response and any questions regarding this matter to the attention of
Assistant Legal Attach~ I b6
b7C
Sincerely,
Scott L. Cruse
Legal Attache
r b6
b7C
Drafted By: I I
Case ID #:'J288A-LA-249816 (Pending) - f
188B-LA-A244126-C (Pending) - CfZ Z,.
Title: VICTIM NOTIFICATION FORM
Synopsis: Victim Contact Information
Reference: 288A-LA-249816 Serial 1
Details:
:o
BusName : :;-ddrq_h o,:t:_sc,ie;g.t..gJ....q,g.:....
BusEIN : 000000000
~~~!~~~
VicMidN:
VicLastN:
SSAN :
VicDate : 20080118
VicDOD
VicMinor:
DOB
Race
Sex
Addr
Addr2
City
State
Country
Zip
Email
HPhone
Fax
b6
b7C
...
~ . . J
To:
Re:
Los Angeles
288A-LA-249816,
From: Los Angeles
02/08/2008
2
u
L L J
3
FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95)
,
- 1-
b3
b6
b7C
owing is a summary o tat correspon ence:
I I
b3
b6
b7C
ff:
I'-' \~
. '.-I
by ___________
_______________________________
___,. _ b6
b7C
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency; V
it and its contents are not to be dist...,__...._......__""'ur age~cy.
~ "'"I ...,,)., , .. ~J
~[ l-~)
~' (.. ~:~' C- ..
-------- - , -1
:t)
ALL IUF0PHATIOM COIITAINED
HEREIM I S IDJCLASSIFIE D
DATE 0 4 - 20 - 20 1 2 BY 60322 UCLP / PLJ/JM
\ ..
FD-340a(Rev. 1-27-03)
Disposition
'{
J.'
..
,
....,.,~.....t 4l, ~'t.
..,
' ~,J,.~-,;
.-t,~7 -
(
Serial # of OriginatingDocument
g
----Ll-.i-;f:!=---------- HEPEIN I S IDJCLASSIFIED
DATE 04 - 20-2 012 BY 60322 UCLP/PLJ/JH
Date Received
From
.. b6
---------l.{)z::;.0..:::.:'.!.:~~ 0::.!,'-c:-.,.=..::~:::;__--!:lJ::...::....
_____ b 7C
'cAddress)
(CityandState)
,
By
I
ToBeRetumcd O Yes ~
,.,, ReceiptGiven Yes O 12(No
GrandJury Material-DisseminateQnlyPursuantto Rule6 (e)
FederalRulesof CriminalProcedure_/
0 Yes IT No
FederalTaxpayerInfonnation(FTI) /
0 Yes ~ No
Title:
Reference:
(Communication
Encbsing
Material)
~ Ori;::
Descr;:n~ ir... re _e_m_e_w_o_f
__________ _;--~-~-c
--.
RE: Subpoena No. CCS-0802247-A Page 1 of3
I do not have additional info unless you find that something is missing or need additional files.
v/r,
ww.Quinnipiac.edu
b6
b7C
Thank you for the information. I have not yet lookedat the files, but if you still needto provideinformation you
can either burn it to a CD/DVDor email it to me at this address,whichever is easierfor you.
Also, before I look at the files in the link, couldyou pleaseremovethe outlookpst file. I assumethat is email.
Emailis outside the scopeof the subpoena. I canonly view the emailcontentwith a searchwarrant. One
exceptionto this is if you or the IT departmentis a partyto the email(to/from/cc)and you are voluntarily
turning it over to me, otherwiseI can not view it.
Becauseyou providedthe materialsto me, you will not haveto appearin front of the GrandJury. If necessary,
I can appear and say this is what'was provided.
Thank you,
~~
Fax
Received subpoenas.
Will e-mail suffice for transfer or can I burn to CD/DVD and Fed-ex? Firewall logs alone would need
over 50 3.5 inch floppies.
Also when will,I know if I'm required to appear or if Grand Jury will except you providing logs?
b3
,~~~:::~,,
(WNW;al:isolute:com.
' .
b7C
Hardware details:
Name. Valu~ b3
II 11
Local IP
Proxy IP
Network Card 1
Description
Network Card 1
MAC Address
Network Card 1 IP
Network Card 2
Description
Network Card 2
MAC Address
Network Card 2 IP
b3
,___
__ _.ICISSP, CISM, MSIA b6
Information Security Officer b7C
Director of Information Security and Network Operations
~~~[~r:~~:8:?S
I
Quinnipiac University
www.Quinnipiac.edu
I
J,
I
f
~'
I
File Number
-- I 4.z
Field Office Acquiring Evidence __ ....;.........a.:L=-::.Jf::i-..
________ ~_..;.__
-
Serial # or Qrigh1atlngDocum~nt I\
Date Received
From
---~--L---.........- ........-...- .............---,--------...J
(NameofContributor/ln_tetViewee)
..
b6
b 7C
(Address)
By
I'
ALL INFORMATION cmITAINED
To Be Returned !] Yes ~No HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED
1.
.ReceiptGiven O Yes Gr'J-10 DATE 04-20 - 2012 BY 60322 UCLP/PL,J /JN
I.. Gr~ndJuryMaterial;'DisseminateOnly Pursuantto Rule6 (e)
.Fedeial Rules ofCriminal,Pr9cedure.../
0 Yes --1.!J No
Federal.Taxp,ayer}nfonn~tion(FTI)
- 'O Yes t(..... No
Title:
Refere~ce:
(Communi
d'ationE~cbsing
Material)
,
b6
b 7C
I@:
--
i-- . ~- b6
-~ =-c...,.~_;~\
r-'--'~ _ -~-- _a\v - ~ ~
. - C:_~{) r .
1 - - - ~ ---=-~ok!
.~t - -- L~ .~ , _ - - -- --
:_ _. ~_L ,--s.. --t~ - - l b~Ll =- _ ~ ---- ~
,....._.._,.,...----'~----.
~,jlJ _ _ C4.__ - c ' - ~~~-~.a,,.=- ~~
- ~ ~ ~ \;U~ _ _
c~_,k,- LO-.<"'d..Cl-~
-- .l~ ---~~
~-_t~--~k- <.-.tlV-~hi-~- ~~~<k .~--~
~~--- .-a---ec~+~W-_j"
_-- lfr'L__,_
-~ -~--~- =,.- - ---'-'- "' ___
---~- ~~
- ~ - -~~$1 --".~~~~)---- ' -. C ~-
i - - -
"'
> ..
~
~wJ?
I
b3
b6
b7C
_____ ......._
___ ___.l~~tated that there could be missing data on the b6
__________
.__ lwith regard
___. to all the possible connections . b7C
by s b6
b7C
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It. is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency;
it and its contents are not to ~e distributed 0111sidevom aveoc,r
Cad r v~,11-1
0 !'>D-z.
-~------------------------------------------------.
(Rev. 06-04-2007)
FEDERAL
BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 03/12/2008
To: Cyber
International Operations
Attn :
Attn:
I --....-....-....-....-____,
SSA ...
Asi..,.a"'---'U"""n...,1...,t...._
__ __,,
~~A~ b6
Fo;I L...,,----------' b7C
Los Angeles Attn: Squad CY-1
SAI...._____ ____,
D
From: Canberra
Contact: ALAT
Approved By: Cruse Scott L b6
Synopsis: I b3
Details:,;.;....;...__...a;...;""--.a..= ....................
-=A~LA~-=T...1...
_______ ....1..l~s.a..i...l.,l,,l,,.l..llal---'-i.......i.1.1.1......i.;..i.~;;..r..J;o1..1......l,,,l,1....1.i.1..U,,1,.....1.1..u..i...ll......;;;u..1.1..1.1..r.i...i.,
9 a
b3
b6
b7C
L-- ,......--....,..,,............,,,,.,,......---------1--:===--=----=----,:----:-:----__JAfter
........ b7D
consu ting wit SA FBI Los Angeles. it was
...d=e.;;;t.;;;e;.;;r;..;.m;.;.;i;;;.;
L...1
n;.;;.e=d:.......;;t;.;;.h.:;.;e::;.....::;.s.;;;:ua:::b;.i::p:o:e;:n:;a;:::;::::=...,e-e
____________ ~
.....
n ......
I
L.... _____________ __.
---....-....-....-....-__;;s~A.;;..i...!....-....-....--1l~a.;;;:l.;;;:s~o-=a~d;..;.v.;;;:i.;;;:s~e~d:......;:;t~hat! I b6
1.--------------------~I had contacted him and b7C
_Send ECtlettcr/fax(Secure_)
__ Enclosure(1i\nachmcnu, / 61.;c ..C..
__ CloseCase1C car cad_. serial_
-- ~/4<..d .;.-hle
--- ~-----------------------------------------.
~----
To:
Re:
Cyber Fro-
288A-LA-249816,
Canberra
03/12/2008
b6
._ _____ _.lrequested in the subpoena. b7C
2
To: Cyber Fro. Canberra
Re: 288A-LA-249816, 03/12/2008
LEAD (s) :
LOS ANGELES
AT LOS ANGELES, CA
++
3
(Rev. 06-04-2007)
FEDERAL
BUREAU
OF INVESTIGATION .
Approved I By: b6
Drafted By:
~=========--.
I I b7C
~ b6
I b7C
I
(
~===~==;==~~ ==-:-:-=-:-::===.:::::--
lwas a F;;;~~n at I
--
---===========:
lat
the time ~o-r-t~n-e-a_t_t_a_c_kand resided in a residence naLL on campus.
The spring semester ended May 9, 2008. The address l~~sted above
is his permanent address, likely that of his parents._
has no other addrrsses listed An Internet Protocol a.,..,.,.,,=I=P-
11~) ____ ___.
b6
\'-\\I b7C
To: Attn: T.ton RA - Cyber Supervisor. Omaha
From: Los Angeles
Re: 288A-LA-249816, 05/20/2008
--~----
attacks.
J
'\
b6
wa s~a- -stucleFJ.,t-a:t~ 19-t
__
1;:he time --; f b7C
the attac,,_....,...,.,..resided in a residence hall on campus (same hall
but different room asL t. The address listed above is his
permanent address, likely that of his parents. Etas no
other addresses listed. An t:lss linked to through
computer records provided by hit COS websi es over 1
million times across three di erent attacks.
2
, .
LEAD(s):
OMAHA
~L----------1 b6
b7C
Interview SSAN:
.=T~e~l"-'-'=----,..._.,,........J,at his Home Address . ..,__
_____________ ____.
L--------'
and ask the following questions:
b7E
NEWARK
@ .....
__ _
b6
Interview I TeJ: I l at his Home b7C
Address, I
following~_q_u_e_s_t,........i_o_n_s_:
______________ ____. and ask the
3
To: Attn: T.ton RA - Cyber Superviso- Omaha
From: Los Angeles
Re: 288A-LA-249816, 05/20/2008
b7E
PHILADELPHIA
___
~..... .....,
b6
Interview! L Tel:1 1 at his Home b7C
Addre~s,Ll __________________ .....,!an~ask the following
questions:
b7E
4
,, , ' ,
To:
From:
Re:
Attn:
Los Angeles
288A-LA-249816,
Tl.tonRA~
05/20/2008
Cyber
Supervisor Omaha
b7E
5
;,, -~
(Rev. 01-31-2003)
FEDERAL
BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
-
Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 07/14/2008
To: Los Angeles Attn: SA~I-----~ CY-1
From: New York
Squad C-37
Contact: SAi b6
b7C
Approved By:
Drafted By:
LOS ANGELES
2
* j - ----- l
..., .. C .... 0
' ?te;
~ .-~
',.
FD-340(Rev.4-11-03) , J}-l-t
File Number ___ 2--i..~- L_,,._</_._9___,_J3/--=6_-_
~,_,_'lf-=-L,4:r_:__-
Field Office Acquiring Evidence _____ ()_i_\_1'1
______ ~--~
From ---t
b6
b7C
TQBeReturned O Yes ~o I
ReceiptGiven D Yes bt..No I
b6
,:
;.;-:,
v~..
ht!.'
-.f'_
t
.
,t
--- b7C
' \
I
--r,:i,-.,,,,-,,...,H*'""'"""'""',:_....,\..,.,
__""t.~-~--;-- -- ----
*'-,
.... , \
b:-~ .....-=- .,._-
;_-:--..; "j.; ' --
\
\
wrvv
'zo -
...
l
l
-- ---- - - "L ,,, e..,.-f: ' , -- - \ -
~ ~,:-
-: -rtA+orr.t~T
__ : W\ -~e,,V/.,{h~-~J/ _&tJ~~F~
-l~1'--,.f20trv,_
--_-__________ 1
- ~ ~ 1' l fU-,..=;.O\.NJ__,_
___ .......,.
________ ...........
..._____ ____ b6
-0 - b7C -
_-,~ --
- - '
1----------tt----------------------------,.--=-----,,---------------------~..;....,..----b6 --
b7C
_ _....,. ~- -
b6
-_-
_9/6--:-i-;f,~~=-----
...............
(J)_
__ ---~
b ........__
7C
. --- - -- - .
-- -- - - - - :.-
'
..... "' --
~----rr-~ ~- ..,.____ __, __ - . Q)____
,:___Jl1'
~f~_::
, ~Y~. !~-----------L--L'---1==~
= L.................--
b6
,b7C
-
--
- b6
b7C
-
__,.,.,_._,..
___.""!,~.t-c---411ii,..:...- co b w WP WP
- 40$ --- !> - -- - -
-~ _k ..~
.. -- ,r2-G /' fr- /t.:) ~
_,.,..... -- ..,._,,. ,._ ------
--- - -
-: -- - - -- --
_;p-fJ
-- -- '
_4.
')
,________ d,yj ~- ~~ -~ ~
,-----------------7-3~;--:::;;=2?
______________________________
~-----------------------
,,
5.
,.:__--_ ___
..,,_rir,_
...
- ,..,..~_--.====-~--,..._.,._....__,.,.._...
--r:1 -~---------.
--
___ ........,.
_..,..,.,,,,...,,.... ~~.
,______.__ 1
- -f~~flp_y-~_f}/;::fY~J-r - ,_______...
-==-__
...,..,.._.,--,.
.,...._.
_____
-~-
.......
-----
-___
"__ ,..,....
...._-
~~._::---
~:k-----
_.........
.. --1::
~-~ - ,C _ : ~
\ --
b6 -------
~======-----:--::
_______ _J
b7C
-- .. -"-
c -~l-=-1-
, VI Vf'-J --
7.
__
.,,, - ...
._
" (Rev.
. FD-3b2 ..
10-6-95)
- - 1-
Date
oftranscription
07/17/2008
____ ___.
___________ ___,L,____,.d=a=t=e......,of
birth I SSAN I
L was interviewed at his b6
...r_e_s_1_d..,.e_n_c_e
___...,A_t..,.t_e_r_b-e
....
1_n_g_a_d_v_1_s_e_d_o_f_t_h_e_n_a
__
lure of the interview, and b7C
the identities of the interviewing Agents,! provided the
following information:
I !stated that has lived at his current
residence for about two months. He stated that a total of six
people live in the house. hat he is currently b6
looking for a job. resided b7C
This
document
contains
neither
recommendations
norconclusions
oftheFBI.
Itistheproperty
oftheFBI
and
isloaned
toyour
agency;,
itanditscontents
arenottobedistributed
outside
youragency. ..... r, H
"' L
FD-302a (Rev. 10-6-95)
-
288A-LA-249816
b6
Continuation ofFD-302 of
._ ______________ ---,1
,__ ____ ,On 07/17/2008 2
,Page --=--b7C
______
__.!was asked if he communi~c~a=t~e~d~-=-:::;,:,.:......:=.::..r,
of the
r:JlP Sdilerofers offline
1 11
meaning 11
not on the website. b6
!stated he did log into the group's IRC c anne which he b7C
: e ieveawas via thel !website. I ~tated
there was nothing going on in the chat room and that there was no
password to get into the chat _room.
I
!was asked if other individuals in the house
would be
to provide able
information ayruit the Internet group b6
ANO~YMOUS H~ stated that house matesL
andl _____ ___.}have also viewed the ANONY._M_O_U_S_w_e~b-s-i~
' t_e________ ____. b7C
I
~as asked again about his frequency of
viewing tlie ANONYMOUS message board or website. He stated that the
last time he- remembered viewing the website was around New Year's b6
Day 2008. I
!stated he had been viewing the website for b7c
at least three years and that he had just stumbled upon the group
on the Internet .
288A-LA-249816
Continuation ofFD-302 of
L- ______________ ....J------ ,On 07/17/2008 ,Page __ 3"--_b6 b7C
JJsed far tbe fttacks is with him at his current residence ofL___J
I -
lwas asked if an one else had access to the
desktop c~o_m_p_u~t_e_r-~i-n--.-h~is
dorm room . ._ ________ _.,.stated no one else
b6
had access to the desktop computer. He state that he did not have
b7C
a roommate while living at! T !was unaware if anyone
else on the! !campus participated in the DOS attacks.
I !does not know if any of his current roommate~
participated in any of the attacks on the COS website.
know his actions were a criminal violation and illegal but didn't
think the FBI would be showing up at his door. I !was
asked a ain if an one had access to the computer in his dorm room b6
at stated that he was the only one who had access b7C
to is computer at that he had no roommate and that he locked
his dorm room door . ._ _____ __.stated he did use a password with
his computer .
group either
I online
lwas again asked
or in real life. I
if he knew anyone
!stated
else in the
that he
b6
b7C
doesn't know anyone else in the group.
:~,t
,, .. ... ....~Jr-,.,,
. ~ - ~ .~-:~:;::~
,...
,,. . " ,. 'l
,a.,"..... '
..'
~
=(r FD-340(Rcv,,....,i A P.
~ , I
UniversalCasePile Number _d-_Q0
__
"1f_-_L.;;;,i../f"----d~~~9 ;J_ Ol;...../i_7..._~~-
-;;__'.}
__
-
Field OfficeAcquiringEvidence__ ..,.:__.:.-
,_A.&.~:-
rf::..:::,e~f):'--
_______ ,~
_,,,,
l Serial# of OriginatingDocument __ 1 __.,,._,;...__.__
_________ _
D Yes -~ ~ .
Title: I/Alf ti 6Cf)
tJ/lv~cl/o,C X/~toto3/-, _Ue,,17,,,,.._
~/v/47e /4/rvf/2:?i~
-:---___;;_-~-LO""t}"--,
' ,Reference: .,L?~d'at~~~~~:.!....:::::::::...------..;._ 0
(Communication
Enclosing
Material)
i
Description: ~
. 1..........=---,====::.:.:....:::.: notesre interview
of
b6
b7C
F
>
-'"
-~- - -" ..... ~ '
- -
b6
_b_7C ____
1
-
- -d ~Af(/VS- _ _3/ft_~O ~__,_
-____
-
!ft-;,r:dldt/CJ/1)/_ ~ ~
,----,-----H-l'l ~:;....__~_..,.._.,.............,_,,_..,.._._,,......,,__b6 --'---
b7C
- -
- -
.. - -
- -
. - - .
.
.. -- -- b6 -- -
. - //dl-Z, b7C
-
&u_ . - . . -
-. - -
- .
~'J{{j
__
I,
-
-
:
;:;:_
- __' ~. .
- &Y
, --
- . -
:
--~~----.
- - .
@ff;'~,_~Ji&s.
'/::< ~~C<.-hin
~/;re- /)[rm/~J.
r
~~C.
-~-
. ,,. - - , - . . .7e~/i- 41~&1~' , .
- .
~
- -
- ~- /4111//Ji
/') _MC!L!p~s-
__
_ .3/_fr~o
.
/.11//CJ/t)e/_-
- . . ~
.
~
.
I b6
if~i.. ~ ~:Ls/~
--
. - - . . b7c
. //r.r:
. I t2/l~re,1t-;5- o/i1f ~~ .
l!c/4-h /,;,._
.. (]Js - v~ /' Mf//lk.J . ~ -
. . :~-1. U__&&GF~-~- __
. ..
;...-
l/2cl/~ .,/egp_P-; _q; ~-~
~-~.P<-- ~~d ,I!(/~
'f-'-
. .
~kc;uJ t(JJ, . .
- C
.
.. - -
a - .. - -~- -
b6
b7C
,, -1-,,//4"" K /v//4; ~ ~ . . ..
-~-u~~a/- I : ~k M k -~
/ );4;/ . ii: ~~J .tf/~ pd
-.-.~-b,&~ d~I --
1~ kwi_~
----jq-e. ;,/J ~t1r~~ ,,
1--------iiekJ~Lear~~ . .. ..
1
_~ - ------tL--~t/4..;;:;...V-,-"..L-;/-~
-L./.~1..,.....
__.......\,.;.
~- -J~~ r_ . ~7->-<:;..;;:;.;.. ;_ __
- /Jt,,
5 //f-yJ/_((!R<
/KC~ - -
,___ .,..-u~,,___ S . t:eCc_a_v/X_;L ~1 r. u1'1_~~ ~ -
J),r'/)/~-<: .
'
- ~ ,.
- ,,. .
'
- I ..
- j
1- I
I
l
I I
r
3.,
---.--;~-e,L~ .~er-d,vC475-,..____--4-{_...____,..---.-.,,...........___,,..-------
.
?' - 0ld'1.
.
t?l'C-
C/
j
. .
tJ-tl r-l4tt,N (/ t:- ~
---------.:....,' --ti
1.....-----''
IL--___________
.
__,..
____ ~..........,......,.,..._.............,_...,.._
FD-302 (R~v. 10-6-95)
- - 1-
.------...,,.., .........
'1"1y 23, 2008,! l date of birth
,_ _______ ___.,----"s~o~c=i~a~la....:s~e=c~u~rity
account number_!___,,,_-..-.,,......,,....-1
ofl
was interviewed by Special Agents._-~ b6
Prior to the b7C
in erview,,__ _ ___, e in erviewing agents' identities
and purpose of He thereafter stated the following:
He was academically dismissed froml I
approximately four weeks ago; he fail~d to maintain the required
GPA. I !completed two years a~ ~ j:ajjr~ng in Mechanical b6
Engineering. The last nine months at,__ __ ........
.....,._his room mate was b7C
I ~tated! !was maJoring in Information
Technology but was not sure of the minor.
I
I
indivi
i !heard
Accordin to
internet group "anonymous" through
and approximately
uals at""",----,"'""'~were upset about a video featuring
20 other
movie
actor TOM CRUI . e group, whic~""""=.,,,,.......,..,,..~new
no other names of, b6
protested at the CHURCHOF SCIENTOLOGY (COS) located in b7C
Philjdelphia. The group met at City hall then went to the protest.
I _stated he was not a member of the group "anonymous" nor did he
attend the protests.
The onl other individual! !believes may be a
of "anonymous ...'_'-=i=s..._ _______ ___.._s__._e....;;;;;lling
provided by! ___ _. b6
Accordinr=i,.....:::t~o~
... ---,,...,,.......,,--...,........,,--...,...--r ................................
""""....................
.....,.
...............
.....,..
........
, b7C
often. resided next door to
._ _ ___.ladvised in approximately January this year,!- .......
,_ _ _.
went to various websites looking for programs to initiate DDOS b6
attacks. He nrovided the following sites: b7C
Investigation on 7/23/2008 at
FD-302a(R'ev.10-6-95)
-
288A-LA-249816
"anonymous" sent two large DDOS attacks and several smaller attacks
against the COS. I !knows! Ito own a Mac Book and a Dell
Desktop. I !used both computers in their room. The DDOS ___ _
attacks were sert using the Dell computer. On one occasion, I b6
b7C
saw onl . monitor approximately 15 of the "nifty" windo._w_s_.
_ _.
The windows were downsized and all running at the same time and
I ~old him they were directed toward COS.
attacks
further
___
against
stated,
!stated
the
I co:
he was not involved
and knows very little
Jdid use his
in any of
about
I
!computer
the DDOS
computers.
on occasion
He
to
b6
b7C
complete and print school work.
(Rev. 05-01-2008)
UNCLASSIFIED
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Drafted.By:
Case ID #:
By:
______________
(
288A-LA-24981~?, (Pending)
Title: UNSUB(S);
CHURCHOF SCIENTOLOGY- VICTIM
Computer Intrusion
00:LA
UNCLASSIFIED
,:. J
To:
Re:
Los Angeles
288A-LA-249816,
From:
UNCLASSIFIED
Omaha
07/29/2008
LEAD (s):
LOS ANGELES
AT LOS ANGELES, CA
Read and clear .
UNCLASSIFIED
2
-
.,
I
(Rev. 06-04-2007)
FEDERAL
- BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
-
Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 07/30/2008
To: Newark Attn: Garret Mountain RA - Cyber Supervisor
Approved By: b6
b7C
Drafted By:
b6
"b7C
b6
b7C
To: Attn: Ga-et Mountain RA - Cyber sulrvisor
From: Los Angeles
Re: 288A-LA-249816, 07/30/2008
----------- b7E
2
To: Attn: G.et Mountain RA - Cyber sulrvisor
From: Los Angeles
Re: 288A-LA-249816, 07/30/2008
LEAD(s):
NEWARK
AT GARRET MOUNTAIN
b7E
3
To: Attn: G.et Mountain RA - Cyber slrvisor
From: Los Angeles
Re: 288A-LA-249816, 07/30/2008
b6
addition please ask for consent to take and search! b7C
computer and/or for him to provided any evidence av~a-1~1-a~b~l~e,--.~
4
--.
-
~
. ' ..._,..~
(Rev. 05-01-2008)
UNCLASSIFIED
Drafted By: I I
Case ID #-12
8....
8A ___L_A
___
2_4_9-8 ding) 7 /-
l-6--(-Pe_n ......
Title: UNSUB( S)
CHURCHOF SCIENTOLOGY- VICTIM
Computer Intrusion
00:LA
I I b7C
On August 6 2008, I
~ telephone
b6
.___ ..........
!provided SAL-__,--w~i-t=h
__t:h:e::=a_=_=a-=r-~t~=m-=e:_n:_t:complex
that as
now livin i located on b7C
UNCLA$SIFIED
,.----------------------------------------------
To:
Re:
Los Angeles
288A-LA-249816,
From:
-
Newark
08/06/2008
UNCLASSIFIED
__..._,-------,.,......._---.---____,..-.,.........,.-r-~--__J~
confirmed
L.1
UNCLASSIFIED
2
,e
..
FD,302 ZRev. 10-6-95)
- 1-
b6
b7C
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency;
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.
~,
I
!
~:~--------....------.
4. ~
.............:...i:.:...--......:.____ __-~.
/I
= -- .-,-- ,-_,- -/ ,..L
..
I ,.
-' '/.
.i
C' b6
b 7C
- FD-340(Rev.4-11-03)
I JI-~..
---~=-g-=g""'-A:...1.----=l-:;.....:..:A-_
FIie Nu1_11ber ----=2.=-
YJ-lq"'g.L..l/ ??~-------
Field OfficeAcquiringEvidence ____ .a::L:.J.{i-l,_
_________ _
From --------L-------------.,.---i--------
(Nameof Contributor/lntetViewce)
'
(Address)
(CityandState)
By __ ,__ ~$::...i1t:.1--..1LI
______ _J------
/
/
To Be Returned D Yes ffNo I
1J ReceiptGiven Yes t2JNo
D
I Grand Jury Material- DisseminateOnly Pursuantto Rule6 (e)
FederalRulesof CriminalPro~edure
.t D Yes ra---No ALL INF0IUlATI0N C0NTAIMED
.'
.,. FederalTaxpayerInfonnation(FTI) ~ HEREIN IS illiJCLASSIFIED
'. DATE 04 - 20-2012 BY 60322 UCLP/PL,J /JN
DY es fZfNi0
Title:
\)N5v~[$) ..
j L""utc.~tP -v l'"L-}t'h..,
~(..~.A-6tly
' { o~ ;o\eJ ~\,.;,~
1 60! (..,A-,
l Reference: - I
I (Communiciuon
.cncbsmgMatenatJ
IJ Description:
.
~riginal notesre in:erviewof
j
II .
!
' .
I ,
~ -
I 9-i 4 '{,Jf-
L..;. . - 4
-~
\
' ' .- -- ~~ -~'=-- .., - . -- - -
\
~ -- --=---=r--"l-------+l!'.!-IJ_k~
--- ta\d~ ---W\-iuLL--u_.
C ......_ _
- - - - ____. - ,_
0
- -- ~d:cL~~- - -~--~ -b6 -~
b7C
-~ -f-----~t?~_o,_+.fu.--f2c-ov-l~
---, --~--~~()) - --
-- --____;_----
--,
--~ -1~" -~l\U,.(-_ C _ _ _ _ - - - __ -
- ---=-a-- ~ - ~cl~l_,,J-
~--~ L ~+--w~>-- ~ ~ b-j~vfck.(
1
~__..~
-1 ~ta-tJ_
_ - -=-
~1 -- 41<i-- ~
--
~-~~----bJ)~ ~S- - '),if~cl._ ~~~- -- ~-=---
I
.-----__,_ __
[was
,_ _____ _,,...._....,....---.----,,-J~
interviewed via telephone
mother ofI
at~,-------~,----
L
b6
After being advised of the nature of the interview and the identity b7C
of the interviewing agent! !provided the following information:
just took up bandwidth. She did not know why he did it.
b6
b7C
by b6
-----------'-----------------,---------------- b7C
.. ~~,,J:l
Q
i
.
1
.
, I
AC 1:
r (
, I
, ftf ~
,I
FD-340(Rev.4-ll-03) . ',I-,., -
E,f~ld
OfficeAcquiringEvidence__ A/4
...
........
.;_r.J._~_K..
____
'::(
J
__ z____
___ -_l_~_T._(UJ-
- _, , ,
,_..
----
..
j'
I JL____________
(Address)
7
f
,1,
CCitv
andState) ~
I '1
By
1 To Be Rrtumed D Yes rJNo
__J--------
~i
1,
-l!
ti,,,
:1 ,,
),
/
I
,;
ReceiptGiven Yes D No 23' ',. '
GrandJuryMaterial- DisseminateOnlyPursuantto Rule6 (e) ~
FederalRulesof CriminalProcedure ,1 J
f Yes D No Bl ~I
... ' l
Title: (A.-.1)&\~{s) {'
l
, '
,t
(Comm~nication
EncbsingMaterial)
l
j
Descrlpllon, ,I'llOriginalnotesreinterviewof
!i
ri
);
J
,
jL--------------ll,'--.;.,,;;;;.a.;,_ l ~/C,veQ........ fo-3 r-5 s,~ra
_..,__,;a...-;;._JJr-_.__,~--- Coe'(!Ii
bg- 1,ru,: (Yi USG 100 I ' :- b6
,,
b7C
\\
d~ (JPEG Image,793xl 121 pixels) http://img329.imageshack.us/img329/2297/docwnent0001
uul .jpg
'633~sll=M&reel
-'S..rooo
.
-~~eai~ :9<:071~~
,-ei;-;tiii.:Ctf12i<
r . .... , . -'Fax:~i.21aao,,ats3
~ . ...... . . -
'\\wti~
flRl.t/ AFFILIATE
OFFlCES
tATHAMa.WATKI
.. .. . .. . .
,., -..: .. NSLL~
. - , ' , ' 'earceicru
, ~ev.:Jt(iey
SN-~ N_~Y9'1',
;oika.
f,-ail.~
~;,.i;{,g
r~~
r&rat
Kor,g San
Holi1 D1eg)
toodOA SariFtancisco
~Argf:les G~~
t.13cr.d
. s1,ocn
va1ey
~, ~pm
VIA HANDDEL1VERV f.bs:oN 'l'o\)'Q
~ ~-~
Wf.h-',gbn,
b6
b7C
WiYJU'C .~ -~ihC?
.~O _~<?~ J .Oht~ :i3ifn>J.~1~c~'2Q~8-~.:~~;c5''Jgfog~ -P.~~~
~ofRi~glyc~rt~ :wilr4e(9p~~e ~n)lfe.C~~~ch~ ~fS~te~t9l~gy. a~ossthe;;tJ!ij~d
be.the:w9tl9'
,~-~tes:.~(Alllerifa... '.fhis:-,viJl sbigge_$t
te~orf~t.
a~~k _9n:a ,eu~on.
Livcswjll be lo~t.A:.separatepe~on~l,attac~-onJtl,lc~~sigc,t _onhe Gh\ll"ch]
,vmbe.launchedontlie 13thof.March 2008-aian widiscfored.time. His.execution
;al~bs,v'itii
lliedc:afil.s
-~f,6the~
,c.oimtlw.Sci~nioiogists f~nrintoJhe .
v.ilistrik~
'.he.artso'feverymember.of this cuit.
5v~9f9~e1nell~
uuthm: Jiav~J>een
:i.ffes 1io1ificd
oft~escrillcgal
:adi~.ilies.
'We ~c ~nding-you.ihis Iett_er bc~usethe,Cliurc)l'.hliS
,n:~:10~
-lq b::licy!!Q1~t
'YO~may:pe
d:irectirig
,~r lca9irigsoineor all o(~e a!=liori~
~f "~onymo~,'1 andhaveassis~edin-its
1 of 1 10/14/2008 11:56 AM
dcJr~t0002fk4.jpg(JPEG Image, 793xl 121 pixels) http://imgl71.imageshack.us/imgl71/3118/docwnent0002fk4.jpg
,1arc1118,
2C04
~~g!Z ' _,
LATHAMa.WATKINSw.
b6
b7 C
I of 1 10/14/2008 11:56 AM
mvcandd-pl.jpg (JPEG Image, 774xl024 pixels) - Scaled (64%) ~ttp://www.epicanon.conc=}vcandd-p l .jpg
>-'--...
b6
b7C
r'l
I,j21212SHIII~
I
-~i~(aO.~
-~~-~~~'
(~'
*ll.Ut.~V,
,UJCMUl-"JU..V.\.'(
'\.lx:!WI>~
~1.'-'lel'f~,
.QA.'\''l).GCI..D\ffff '',ffll'l'<aoSS
.~11CUnu., ..,(1,UGl:AJIL.vt'_
~-"---,
;
:niis liienrciaiii&t
Ja,v,iiriiiiia's by:theciiuiclii
orscicntoiogy C~e "Ch~h1 in- f
;coruiectioii
with':iseriesorun1a,vru1
wcaismade bya gto'uporiiidividiials"k.nownas
. f
.\-Anonymoiis,a
instCliun:li'tcadc:sand'
''shion~::'.'',.. , .. , '" - , . ,. ':
.-_s:i~~~~~~~ ~r!:~~~~~u'cniascd
rf~;~o~;
Yandalism;h~cnt;iindtbreats'of
violence
inawn~gnor.
agairis~ mem.~rs
Church;i~
thC: and~
-<:huich Aiionyrnous'mcinbcrshave
properly. made ~n'jhreati
bombthreats; zii4
cominitteilactsofviindaliiintigainstScientologyChurches,
JndMd1131s
idcnlilicdU.
~ orAiioiiymous,1iave
, _;1>e,tig mruic~ng pli'onc'c&11s; ..~ ,.,..~""':"":''I
&n1{u1sarindl!iicateiiiiif
raxes,
posted threats
onihe1riicrnei'anifiiuiinc11;threaien'td
Sclen'toiogistScngagcd/
t;ld11 , ~
, ,inreligious
mlccs;Asafunner panof itiecampaig1{ Janii1y
ofterror;on 30;2008;' ,
~~1~~ siriiut~ic'd
'1ci1efs iili~ \YC~~se~t byA;~9~~Mi~tote~g1~tf,
.~_cicntology
Chu~~sJ~ S~ut~em, Califo!'"ia.
., .Anonymous niembc'isiiavcaiso emailstoScientology'cliuic&C$,
sen(tbreaieiiint
~[Iwill]'killyou:;;
ivhicliincludethe'follo,ving: theauthonty'to'uie
I ha,-i: lethalforce;~
'and"I'm,vatchirigyou;and l controlthebombst 16nFel>ruaty
.l3,200S;'Anonymous
:Pl#~fa.:vi.d~thrc.iton.d.ieJ~t~:11;sia1l9g::
. - ' " " ,,, ' ,
I of 1
10/14/2008 -10:34 AM
.. I
mvcandd-p2.jpg(JPEG hnage, 777xl024 pixels)- Scaled (64%) http://www.epicanon.conC:]nvcandd-p2.jpg
>
b6
b7
I of I 10/14/2008 10:35 AM
CD00I.jpg (JPEG Image, 744xl024 pixels) - Scaled (61%)
.' http://i280.photobucketcom'albwns/kkl99~1...-----''CDOOI.jpg
,, b6
RABINOwni;B01.IDIN,STM1>ARD;KRL~SKY
& LIEBERM:AN;P.C.
- ,, . ' ., .-. ' ., .. . .:ATIOR.~YSATLAW . '." , ..... ,., . b7C
111BROADWAY, EUM'.1nllrl.OOX
m'z
'NEW.YORK, 10006-1901,'"
1UD'1!0!,1i'2122St 1111
FAX 212610614'
I . ;
GJ2l2VIUI
~~~~
i..x...~
' DCM U-l!UM'-"I .
P,,,..~a,(ICUllJn'J'f.
\~lJIA!H.&r
.._.......
,-
--
.....
~
,,._,
.....,....,..
,JDll'QCISI
.a
',!>OU.I 11.
~b_c#,PQOS
I NI07109
Dcilcvlllc:
I ALL IUF0PHATIOM COIITA
HERE IM IS
I NED
IDJCLASSIF IE D
Rc:~'Dl~~\ctivitics
DATE 04- 20- 2012 BY 60322 UCLP/PLJ / JM
0-1 I
i'lb!slA'Yfmitlwl,ccn~ncdbY,thcChuichof'Sclen~(lhe"Chuzdii'!n
connection mthascrlcs bya g:roupof
ofunli'l\fu!'lh=tsmadc b)llvidU3lslaio\\'ll&S<
againstOiuzchleadcnand~oocrs. .We\\ntcaboutyoiifaivides
"Ano11)1'110us~
on liclwfofthisgroup. Whilemen:~ful pfcketlni,-v.tmothernise
notR$11{cteiJby
l:w,b orcourseprotecteduncle:the Fini~ 'axe'~
'i\'C ihat;''vm.out
'apparc-ntlcadiogrolcirithegrotn'youmayalsobeutlng!n~ofoth~.nJ$0 ...
'~;ae~~ti~;s'.~~n~' - '"
:Afyouundoubtcdl.~."'CTI&\\.iic,mi&is'."'" 2008, ofAnon
members
havccngagedina'cam~J:iorwixlalfun;Jwassm~thrt3isofviolcnccaJ::,
CfiUl't!i
Oiufuli.itsmcmbeis'and l'{Opcrty, b4ve
"Atl0ll)'ll)Oll$mmibcrs illtmacd\villi
the,
FimAmaidincnt'riifits
oi'aiw-cbmemberstodiscuss theirreligious cesmth, .
"#ie:nbcq
ofthepublicandtodisin'bu!crdlpOU$U1m1urc:ili~~been a ..
-~ntinuingfoimofhatassmcnthiNcwYorl:.:wcbclitl'Cthat)Wpcmiwtyh3,-c
engagedinsuchactlvilics,ln<:<?nc~irni~~- '
, have
In llddition,individualsidentifiedas bci part of Anonymoiii i:mdc
lwas.1ingphone ~Is. $Ctllw!guam'tfucatcni: faxes;postcd
tb:cais
ontheIntcmtt
andpublicly t~~ to~ Scicntolo~s engaged intcli&iousservlce,,
madebomb
!W~~~-and~i~cdacuofv.i.ndalismtgalll$tSclcntolQg)'_Cburchcs; As
30,2008;leuers~ sj!llwated
a furtherpart of t!Jccampaignof tcm>r,on Jam.my
I of I 10/14/2008 11:59 AM
c:;oqo~Jpg
(JPEG Image,744x1024pixels) - Scaled (61%) http://i280.photobucketcom'albwm/kkl91
...____ _,!D002.jpg
\
' -.
Calif~
weresentby Anonymous
anlhra.'<
.. .
to mote thanlwcntyScimlology
. . .
1:1
Churches Soulhcni
b6
0n'F~ u;~.~l!Ofl~~ayio~onJ!!c~~~ b7 C
Wearcan elite Anonymous.~
llic'l31hotMiicli200S-oiic'S
kllopupackofni~~deloi:itclnihe:ctmrc6esof .
SclcniolOll)'aems America.:
lhc UnikdS131CSof Thiswillbellie
\\'orld'sblggm !Crroristattackon a religion;tlvcs,\\ill belost.
A ~c penOft&1atbekon (the l'rcmtll!oflhe Church)willbe
the t311t
bunchedC)I), orM.ut1,2ooa time.ms
01anlllldudosed
along
exicuiion with~ dcalhso(olhei ~ SdcnlO!oiuu
willitrikercatlntolhc
_~~f~:~~flhis~~ :-
have&ennoilliido_fthcsc'ilkgil~~~;
.LawciifofCtlnentautboiitics
You u JiRctins
bccnldcniliicd
1iavo ~ We
or1cidtngaciiocso( :
iher:cforea:c~1ha1 ,)-ouractiviiicsmay~y~1ndirectlysuppo'rll~:: .
campaignofactualthreats-and
incltcmcnls.Actssudiash=lng Chwthmembmto
mteifetcwlthlhcircxctdseofthcirrishtsor~orrcligioo,
'letal~~lhic:ts
orlncilingvioleiice
.aga{nsitheChui-ch anditsmcmbcis;'and en~ mICU of . .
'imodsm(such'i.$Illeslmu!ited~ -attack;bomb,ai$on ind dcatlilhrta1s)
,ioli!c
Swe'andFcdcr.l.1bw. Wedemarid thai)'Ol.lttfrainfiomcoinmitting;
auistinz, or'ac&g:
Ineonccrt illegalacts
wllliolhffl iii-coiwnittiiig iiIlicCm:dioriu pwliloners.
dirccta1
ShouldAnonvmous contiri~ incitingolhco,and/or a\gagcinviolentactsagainst11ic
. .
Churchor ilsmcmben,weaic prcpw1 to lako~c-.-crsteps may berequited toprotcci,
lheehurch. .
,..
I of I 10/14/2008 11:59 AM
..
,,
se6it i: tetitt.Ti.
i<ll.l8ERl,'Y
L.'.S!iARPE.
WRR,\V.BiS'!.VERS1EIN
JOA.'4J.tYECCll{OLI .
SlE\lcH H. 'o\'~BERGSR
JOSePjt J;\'/El$S),\A.~
StMU /1. '/r.t.UAiASON
01:co_uNsei;
ru:.o,,1S615.115757
dctober,8;2008'
-1 ,-...,. .,...,,,,
Member:Chimera
Pe/ifMrC:
.
:Re! t~rtO~Y!'JfQ
)
. _.. .
n
ALL INF0PJ.IA T I0N cm rr AH IED
HEREIN IS U!i.TCLASS IFIE D
<~>ur by.the~hurchof.
law firm has.bet?!n:retained Sfi~ntqlogyofNeviYo* in
~ S$riesi>f;~em.,fist
COOQE;CtiOO.\Yith anct-'parishione,rs
t~fea~,agains,l;Chr_ch,l~aders
~n lritemet-gtj:,pknown:?~r~An9nyqi~ms'\
made,:by
. .. Sine~ .~a~uarx.-.2.(J~.~/f!l~ni~e~
QfAnonymous:h~veen_gag_ed'.in-a_~!11.Pat~n-of_
Viplenc~~gam~ttheChorch_.'.1fs:membersa_nd
.CIJur~h. Anqraymou~
prop~fW~ m~,r.nb~r~
?QrrtP
hay~:rn~~e.n~:rfte.rf>y_~
thr~~\s~:a)-s9ot~t~at.s:~n~:comr,;itted
acts,.ofvarjdalism
~g~ili~t$cie,ntc;ilogy)Sburh~.s.
Th~y,~aV~m.~cfe.n~~~siljg~p,hpn,e.~all~~:~erj(yulgat,and
,.,....,.,... 9Jaxes
th'reatenin 'ostea-lnreatsct:tnetntemetancv
. - .,.J~--
.c-
ublicl":threatenectto~km
..1 ~ . n ........,.~"-...~ ....P..
-,.~~ ,......., . . ..,.
~- .,.Y ...
~~i~tj_t9l9gi,~~f~rjg~g~g
1
:OnJ~n'iJaiy:ao/20.osrfinqnymo~s.:
!1i>.~~t1gi9~t'~.s~fyices;
cnur~nes
.over~tvi~o~y;~crentQtogy
rn~(6brs~~~tjJ!e~~ts~con1afn11fa~simuia_ted;an~tiraxJo
ih.Soultiem.~~lifo'rtii~~. ~ . . . .
W~~rirar:i~IJt9~t19.r~yriJ9~s.
Onlfi~;~~ttiPf
Marc~200~. ~n,e:.5
wilJ
ki19gra1:rfpa~1<:of.ilJ!rog~ycerin detonatejn t~e Churchesof,SciE;mtology
~cross;th~U.nited'Statesof'America:~ .. Thisvjill.beth~world'sbigg~l
lerrofist;ittackon~ religion;lilieswillbeJost...A.sep~raieP.e,rsori~I
attac~
TAMPA, .+ +
I
~---.:_i<lllllSOll, rorE,,U01'0R, Rl/'11, & IIUl!.N$,1.1.P
Tt'~&NEY:S AND COl!l/SlLLOl!.S AT I.AW
or
on [the Pro$ident tho Chumi]\\'4 be 13undiedon lhe.13'.hof March
aloog \\iUItho dC3\hsofOtllet
2008 at ao 11ndi$do$ootimo.Hise~e<:IJtlon
c:oun1lo$sScientologl$1$wa$1rilco
f~ in'.otho~ orC'iCf'Jmember of
llnc:ull.
ABOUTC&D'sFROM.....
STATEMENT I __ __ b7 C
With this C&D came one for my parents aswell (not uploadingthat one) which wasthe sameas mine, as
well as a copy of the Anonymous Hate Crimesdvd for e~chC&D.
Now, my an_alysis.
After seeing LittleSister'sC&D,then mine, I havecometo the conclusionthere are two different types
for a reason.
ALL IMFOPliATIOM C01ITAIMED
Type 1: Leadership HEP.Em I S UNCL ASSIFIE D
C&D,no DVD,accusesof having a leadingrole in Anon activities. DATE 04- 20-20 12 BY 60322 UCLP/PLJ/JM
I noticed now for the Newperson-type C&Dit'had my nameand han~le,and mentioneda few of the
global protest dates. With the DVD,as well asa C&Dsent to my parentsaswell, I havecome to the
conclusionthat this type is meant for peoplethe Cosconsidersnewer members.I alsofound it odd that
mine came from Clearwater, FL.
This is the Cosattempting to intimidate new members.If you were new and got this, wouldn't you
contemplate ending your participation with Chanology?Youjust got a letter from the home base of
Scientologysayingyou.could be in leaguewith somebad people!Theyevensent a DVDtelling you what
these bad people have done!
As for Leader-typeC&D, I noticed how it statesthe recipient may be taking part in "not so benign
activities of Anonymous" outside of the peacefulpicketingthat is protected by the FirstAmendment. In
New-type, there is NO MENTIONof the peacefulpicketingor accusationof "no~so benign" activities.
Also, the law firm is one that's not as far awayasClearwater.Thereis also no DVDenclosedwith it.
1.
..,
. ~
In my eyes,this is the Cos trying to break us apart by makingus questioneachother's stancein the
group, our motives, etc. In past conversationswith Anon,it's beensaidthat we needto stop hanging out
and being friendly with each other, and if I'm right about what this tactic is attempting to do, such a
move could ruin us completely.
We need to show the Cos that they can't breakus apart, they can't makeus losetrust in e_ach other. To
show them that we can't even trust each other is to showthem that they've won.
All I can say after all that, is that I will still continueto contribute howeverI can,and now with this
knowledge of the situation, let's show them that we meanit when we say"Anonymousis Legion."
2.
..
,
This is the person who Hand Delivereda C&Dletter tot~~ member"First Vendetta"'s house.This person
also harassedhis family by slamming on the door for 20 minutes,then slippinga "Anonymous No More"
flier which had First yendetta's real name,and location,aswell as his picture on it, with the words
"Anonymous No More" on the bottom of the flier. This is one of the peoplethe Churchof Scientology
hires as "security".
The police have been informed of this, and we are currentlytrying to find out this personsname so we
may file a police report.
., .~-"
-
..
:' ic , ' t,: ,"If
r)\i/\i .1 ;
p,,..,::~;\1\~QUI
b6
b7C ''
.
. ~
- - ,,1,. ..:~,,........,~
_,
;~~--~- ,,. ::>-1,
RABINOW,ITZ,BOUDIN,STANDARD,
KRINSKY& :tIEBERMAN,P.C.
ATTORNEYSATLAW
111BROADWAY,ELEVENTH FLOOR
~~WYORK,NY 10006-1901 b6
TELEPHONE2122S4l Hl b 7c
JAX 2126744614
I
t I c212,2s4 1
i mr i 1
1 I I
1)
LEONARD B,BOUDIN
(l91:Z.1939) COUNSEL
vtCTO!I.IWllNOWJTZ
(1911-2007)
MICHAELJ<IUNSKY LEONARD 1:WEINGLASS
'DEBRAEVENSON
ERIC!.t LIEBERMAN . TERR.'/GROSS .
DAVIDB. OOl.l>STEIN
QOOSTOPHERJ.KLATEI.L CRAIGKAPLAN
THOMAS
R..ASflER
September4, 2008
\
Dead'----...---
This lawfmn has been:retainedby the-Church.of Scien(ology.(the''Church")in
connectionwith a.series of unlawfulthreatsmadeby a groupoihdividualskilownas
Anonymous11 ag~instChurchleader~and]ariS~~ners. We writeaboutyor.activities
11
.,
tln:~~ts,arsonthreatsand.committedacts
of vandalismagainstScjentologyChurches.,As
a furtherpartof thecampaignof terror,on-January
30;2Q08,fottersC()P,~iw.pg
~i~t~ted
anthraxwere sentby Anonymousto morethan.twentyScientologyChurchesin Southern
California.
Law enforcementauthoritieshave.beennotified
of theseillegalactivities,
I
Stateand.Federallaw; We demandthatyourefrain.from coimitting,assisting,iQcitingpi:
actingin concertwith others in committingillegalactsdirectedat the Churchor-its
parishioners.ShouldAnonymouscontinueinciting'others, and/orengagein violentacts
againstthe Church.orits members,we.arepreparedto takewhateverstepsmaybe
requiredto protectthe Church.
Sincerelv. /\
b6
"' b7C
---,------------------------------~--,--~--
Registrant Contact:
WhoisGuard
WhoisGuard Protected
8939 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #110 - 732
Westchester, CA 90045
us
Administrative Contact:
whoisGuard
WhoisGuard Protected (5a0cb68ffe0643bc9440d078717d784a.protect@whoisguard.com)
+1.6613102107
Fax: +1.6613102107
8939 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #110 - 732
Westchester, CA 90045
us
Technical Contact:
WhoisGuard
Fax: +1.6613102107
8939 S. Sepulveda Blvd. tt1io- 732
Westchester, CA 90045
us
Status: Locked ALL IUF0PHATIOM COIITAINED
HEREIM I S IDJCLASSIFIE D
DATE 04- 20- 2012 BY 60322 UCLP/ PLJ/JM
Name Servers:
nsl.vaninollc.com
ns2.vaninollc.com
RandomInformation and Links:
The Largest Community website for Anonymous and Protesting. I am currently helping r'i.m it:
http://www.whyw1forotest.net
Scientology's Enemys:
http://www.xenu.net/archive/enemy names/
Cut that out. Seriously. Quit it. You have shown up ~Q my home now on two separate occasions
to hand deliver notices which accuse me of illegal activities which are hilariously far from the
truth. The letters which you sent got a total of four things correct. My name, my mom's name, I
am a part of anonymous, and I am site staff on EplcAnon.com. ,
I have never made any attempts or had any desires to harm any Scientologlsts. They are victims
of a cult. My father is a Scientologist, as are several of his friends. I know several of these
people. The idea that I would wish any malice upon any of them is absurd at best.
I have invited you to have conversations with me in the past, since you obviously know my
name and address. The closest you have come to communication with me is having that horrible
banshee woman shriek my name and cackle at me from across the street. For the "most ethical
people on earth" and a "religion based around communication" you have failed miserably at
demonstrating either of these claims.
Your only success has been cowering from communication and discussion; cowering from the
truth. You have made bogus legal claims and attempted to intimidate me from practicing my first -
amendment rignts. You have done exactiy the opposite in doing so. You have validated claims of
your abuse and harassment of anyone who speaks the truth about your organization. Expect me.
Love,
I b6
xoxo b7C
\
\
1 of 1 10/14/2008 11:28 AM
Op~ation Clambakepresent:The ScientologyFair Gamepolicy http://www.xenu.net/fairgame-e.html
This is the much talked about 'Fair Game' policy in Scientology. Is this an
ordinary church that w,e should just let.~o about its own business?
. ,
TREASON Sspension of pay and ,deprivation of all .uniforms and insignia,
a black mark on~eft . cheek -and confi~ement on org premises or
dismissal from post and debarment from premises.
DOUBT Debarment from premises. Not to be employed. Payment of fine
amounting to -any ~um may have cost org. N9t to
be trained or
proce sed. Not to .be COIIU)\Unicatedor . argue
~ Fair gam~. May be _dep~ived of property or injured by
any means , by any Scientologist without any discipline of the
Scientologist. May be tricked; sued or lied to -or destroyed.
LRH:jp L: RONHUBBARD
Gopyright . (c) 1967 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Wh_en ,brought up, they often try to changethe subject and.for exampleattack you,
asking what criminal acts you have on your co_nscience9r if you are payed by the
drug cartells or something. According to Scientologyall critics of Scientologyare
criminals, that's why they are critics. Nice logic.This is only standard Scientolqgy
tech, it's part of the training they have payed a fortune to learn. Hubbardsaid so,
period.
I
l of 4 . 10/14/2008 11:43-AM, .-:1:
I
. r ., ,.,. ....
Op.;rationClambakepresent:The ScientologyFair Gamepolicy http://www.xenu.net/fairgame-e.html
.. II yuu II IC:Uld~C lU ~cc ll II vu~ II ll ICII ~lUJJIU JJCI ~Ulldl Cllld\,I\~ ClllU
HUBBARDCOMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCOPolicy Letter of 21 October 1968
CANCELLATION
OF FAIR GAME
LRH:ci:cden L. RONHUBBARD
Copyright (c) 1968 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Comments:
~
A waiver or quit claim is given or sent the studen~ stating
Date ____ _
~lace ____ _
Only when this is signed the student may have his <;:ourse f_ee
returneq, but ~o -other fees as he a~~epted that se~vice.
The ex-student should realize this makes him Fair Game and outside
our Justi~e Codes. He may not have recourse of any ~ind bey~nd refund.
And af~er signing can only ,return to Scientology as per policy on Fair
Game.
.-::>IVl'"'I
4 of4
10/14/2008 11:43 AM
u
., '-
vs.
Filed concurrently with: (1) Evidentiary objections; (2) Declaration of Donald J. xxxx and Exhibits; (3) Declaration
of Graham Berry and Exhibits; (4) Declaration of Florian Schwanert and Exhibits; (5) Declaration of Garry L. Scarff
and Exhibits; (6) [Proposed] order.
PLEASETAKE NOTICE that on Friday, October 24, ioos, -at 8.30 am In Department_76 of this Court, located at 111
North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, Defendant Donald xxxx will and does hereby move this Honorable ..Court
for.an order striking the Complaints of.each of Plaintiff in thelr entirety, without leave to amend, and further
aw~rding the Defendant his i"easona~le attorneys' fees and costs Incurred in bri~ging this special motion to strike.
This special motion to strike will be and is brought upon the grounds that each Plaintiff's claims, causes of action
and/or requests for relief are subject to being stricken, and are barred, in their entirety pursuant to the provisions.
of Code Civ. Proc.425.16, the United States ConstitutioQ ~nd the California Constitution.
This motion Is also made pursuant to the court's equitable and Inherent powers to control its own calendar and for
such other and further relief tha.t this Honorable Court may deem just and proper. -
This motion is based upon this notice of motion and motion, the following memorandum of points and authorities,
all.other papers.filea concurrently herewith, the pleadings and other documents on file in this matter, the reply
memorandum Defendant intends to file, any further argument the Court might allow, and such other matters as
may properly be brought be(ore the Court prior fo or a_tthe hearing on this notice of motion and moti,on.
Respectfully submitted,
Graham E. Berry,
Attorney for Defendant Donald xxxxx
TABLEOF CONTENTS:
I. STATEMENTOF RELEVANTFACTS..............................
;..........................
6
1.
THERE IS NO PROBABIUlY PLAINTIFF WILL PREVAIL............ 16
CALIFORNIA CASES
City of Los Angeles v. Animal Defense League, 135 Cal.App. 4th 606 (2006) ... 14
Diamond View, Ltd. v. Herz, 180 Cal.App. 3d 612, 618-619 (1986) .... 16
Huntingdon Life Science v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty, 129 Cal.App. 4th 1228 (2005) ..9
Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc., v. Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty U.S.A., Inc., 143 Cal.App. 4th 1284
(2006) ......................14
Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center, 23 Cal.3d 899 (1979) aff'd sub nom ...................15
Schraer v. Berkley Property Owners Association, 207 Cal.App. 3d 719 (1989) .........16, 17
FEDERAL CASES
Consolidated Edison C(?.v. Public Service Comm'n of New York, 447 U.S. 530, 546-547 ..... 19
Frisby v. Schultz, 487 U.S. 474, 101 L. Ed. 2d 420 (1988) .....15
NAACP v. Claibor11eHardware Co., 458 U.S. 886, 909, 73 L. Ed. 2d 1215, 1233 (1982) .. 15, 18
2.
NLRB v. Retail Store Employees, 447 U.S. 607, 618-619 ............18
Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe, 402..U.S. 415, 419-20, 29 L. Ed. 2d .1 (1971) ......18
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74, 64 L. Ed. 2d 741 (1980) .....................15
Schenk v. Pro Choice Network of Western New York, 519 U.S. 357, 137 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1997) ...... 19
Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Memb's of New York State Crime Victims BD., 502 U.S. 105 (1991) ..... 19
Southwestern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad, 420 U.S. 546, 43 L. Ed. 2d 448 (1975) .....................15
OTHER AUTHORITIES
Well & Brown, Cal. Practice Gulde, Civil Procedure Before Trial, 9: 708 ...17
CALIFORNIA STATUTES
California Constitution
Article 1, Section 2 ....................................................................................
8, 15
Article 1, Section 3 ....................................................................................
15
FEDERAL STATUTES
United States Constitution
First Amendment. ...................................................................................
15
Fourteenth . Amendment. ............................................................................
15
This case Involves a C.C.P. 527.6 Temporary Restraining Order obtained against Defendant on August 11, 2008.
Accordingly, most of the Defendant's "public Issue" and other evidence herein concerns events until August 20,
2008. However, subsequent -abuse is Included.
Defendant Donald xxxxx Is a 43 year old man without any criminal convictions or record. He has never been
Involved in a civil harassment proceeding. Declaration of Donald xxxxx ("xxxx Deel.') 114.He ls opposed to the
Church of Scientology's wrongful and abusive conduct and not any of their copyrighted beliefs. xxxx Deel., 11115-9.
,_rD_e_c1_ar_a_t1_on_of_G_r_a_h_am_E_._B_e_rry~(~"B_e_r~ry:._D_ec~l.~,"~)~11~8-5.
___________________ _
In March 2008, Defendant began his continuing participation with the group known as "Anonymous." xxxx Deel.,
111110-12.Anonymous Is a global group of tens of thousands of Internet users who have mobilized to stop the
copyright, tax, civil rights, human rights and other abuses of the Church of Scientology. Berry Deel., 1111
8-86.
'~~~~~:::-::-=::-:-:::-:-::-.~~::::::=-=::-::=::-::=-:~:::-::-:==~
Most Anonymous have a stron and reasonable desire to maintain their anonymity. The Church of Scientology has
a documented reputation for unmasking and punishing their critics, such as those participating in Anonymous.
___________ 3.
Declaration of Ga_rryScarff (''Scarff Deel.") ,147-51, Berry Deel. ,J,187-366.This is_unconstitutional.
In McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission 514 U.S. 334 (1995) the U.S. Supre.,meCourt held that "[p]rotections for
anonymous speech are vital to democratic discourse ... in particular: to protect unpopular Individuals from
retaliation at the hand of an Intolerant society." Berry De~I., ,J,164-65.
Indeed, after Defendant had participated In the June 14, 2008, global picket against Scientology crimes and .
abuses, Church of Scientology agents followed Defendant for two days and "ran the plates" of an elderly friend's
car.
By_July 19, 2008, Sclentolqgy's Office of Special Affairs, which includes their attorneys herein, had identified.
Defendant and his associates. xxxx ,i,i 13-15, 22-25, 29. Scientology preaches that the "purpose of the lawsuit is
not to win." It Is to "harass" and "utterly ruin." Berry Deel., 1)84, Exh. I, p. 338. Th~ Anonymous protests, and the
Defendant's First Amendment activity at issue herein, involve public Issues of great' global interest. Berry Deel.,
11114-56,xxxx Deel., 113A-0.
The purpose of Code of Civil Procedure ("C.C.P.") 527.6 ls to provide quick relief to harassment victims
threatened with great or Irreparable injury. Grant v. Clampitt, 56 Cal.App. 4th 586 (1997). Section 527.6 is not
designed to be a sword to silence critical speech. Evidencing such, C.C.P. 527.6 (b) provides that constitutionally
protected activity, as In the case at bar, Is excluded from its scope. C.C.P. 527.6 states its injunctive relief is
available only in certain delineated circumstances.
The Code requires unlawful violence, a credible threat of violence, or a knowing and willful course of conduct ... that
seriously alarms, annoys or harasses the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose. The course of conduct
must be such as to cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and it must actually cause
substantial emotional distress to the plaintiff. C.C.P. 527.6.
Tlie petitions state no allegation of unlawful violence. For example, Ms. Uvizl testifies, in her declaration, that she
feels threatened and unsafe when Mr. xxxxx is around. Uvizl Deel., para. 6. However, her Form CH-i00 answer to
c.
question 6 expressly testifies that Mr. xxxxx did not commit any acts of violence or threaten any acts of violence
against".Ms. Uvizl.
Furthermore, the two petitions do not describe conduct that seriously annoys, etc. and serves no legitimate
purpose, as the exercise of constitutionally protected free speech, is certainly legitimate.communication. The
alleged activity although not necessarily pretty, never rises to the level of a threat of violence, or of.anything. Mere
opinion is expressed, questions are asked.
Any threat was nothing more than a threat to speak truth. Most telling, at section 6e of the'Petitlon, Ms. Uvizl did
not describe, by what specific conduct and by what specific words, the alleged conduct that had seriouslyalarmed,
annoyed or harassed her. This defect alone is sufficient to dehy the application on grounds of failure.of due
process, i.e., notice of the conduct complained of in detail, as well as a fatal procedural defect under Civil Code
section 527 .6.
Even taking the petition atface value, a prima facie case of harassment has not beenmade. Constitutionally
protected activity, including speech, has been deemed by statute not to be included within the meaning of "course
of conduct" under Civil Code section 527.6 (b) (3).
Furthermore, Appellate opinions are consistent: private communications are constitutionally guaranteed forms of
expression. Thomas v. Quintero, 126 Cal.AP.p:4th 63~ (2005), Califor!)ia Constitution Art. 1, Sectio11-2:
The constitution states that "a law may not restrain or abridge liberty of speech or press". Because the alleged
harassment Is presumed t9 be, and factually is, based on constitutionally protected speech, assembly and
protesting the application must be denied .
In addition, where an act, such as public criticism, protest, free speech, attempting to bring the truth to the public
in genei:al and to members of the church.In particular; serves a legitimate purpose, and there is no evidence to.
support the conclusion that defendant is contacting plaintiff for any other purpose than fo meet this legitimate
need, such conduct does not constitute "harassment." West, Annotated C.C.P. '527.6, Byers v. Cathcart, _57
cal.App. 4th 805 (~997).
The determination of an injun.ction requires that this Court apply the "clear and convincing" standard. Accordingly,
absent a finding of a high probability that unlawful harassment exists, the application must be denied. Russell v.
Douvan, 112 Cal.App. 4th 399 (2003).
4.
Fatally, there is no allegation of ongoing conduct here. The course of challenged conduct must be ongoing at the
time the injunction is sought in order to obtain Injunctive relief under the harassment statute. Scripps Health v.
Marin, 72 Cal. App. 4th 324 (1999).
Inasmuch as the Defendant has done nothing to qualify for an injunction in the first instance, and since there Is no
ongoing conduct alleged which is either illegal or improper under the standards of C.C.P. 527.6, the application
must be denied. In addition, there'is no threatened injury.
Since an injunction will liot lie for prior claims, and only to prevent threatened injury, it can not be used as
punishment for past acts. Huntingdon life Science v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cru~ity, 129 cal,App. 4th 1228
(2005). Thus, the granting of.an injunction requires "clear and convincing" evidence of future threatened harm.
The petition and the facts in any form do not support such a finding. The plaintiffs also lack credibility. Ms. Uvlzl
alleges that the "date of most recent harassment is 5/10/08; 7/26/08; 8/10/08." Form CH-100, question 6 a.
However, her declaration states that her first encounter with Mr; xxxxx was in late July. Uvizl, Deel., para. 3.
She also testifies that she became aware of Mr. xxxxx "several weeks ago" (Iii late July, 2008) and she then states
that his activity has been ongoing for "the past several months." Uvizl Dec., 11113-4.
Furthermore, Ms. Uvizl's own
video evidence does not support her claims. On the contrary, it indicates that on at least one occasion Ms. Uvizl
was engaged in a debate of the issues with the Defendant. She did ,not demonstrate the allegations set forth In her
complaint and supporting declaration herein.
_Similarly, the evidence also shows Plaintiff Miranda aggressively going right up to Defendant and slamming his
open hand into Defendant's video camcorder lens in use by Defendant.
Finally, there is credible evidence from which to conclude that these proceedings were actually instigated by the
Church of Scientology, acting through Its attorneys Kendrick L. Moxon and Ava Paquette, and that the T.R.O.
herein is being abused ~Y the Churc_hof sc1entology and Mr. Moxon.
-#
Mr. Moxon is part of the legal unit of the Church of Scientology Office of Special Affairs which is also located In the
Church of Scientology management'building at 6331 Hollywoo_dBoulevard, Los Angeles, CA~
The evidence indicates that Mr. Moxon's associate attorney, Ava Paquette, Esq., personally a'ppeared on the public
sidewalks and threatened Defendant witharrest and prose,cutlonon July 14, 2008. Th~ evidence also establishes
that she did not expressly do so on behalf of any clients.
The evidence further indicates that Mr. Moxon personally appeared on the public sidewalks and threatened
Defendant with th_esel_egalproceedings on July 22, 2008. He did not do so expressly on behalf of any client . Mr.
Moxon expressly stated that he was going to file a law suit the nextday, July 23, 2008.
Mr. Moxon's own declaration of service refers to his communication with the Plaintiff's on August 10, 2008, one day
before this proceeding was filed. -
There is credible evidence that Mr. Moxon has previously instigated litigation against Scientology critics, litigation
opponents and their legal counsel, and that Mr. Moxon has previously engaged in blackmail, bribery, perjury,
obstruction of justice and other public corruption in such matters. Berry_Deel., ,111)290-358,Exhibits E-H.
Defendant's evidence also indicates that Mr. Moxon abused the August 11, 2008 Temporary Restraining Order
herei~ by applying it to locations expressly excluded by the court in. its Temporary Restraining Order, and by
attempting to have law enforcement officers use it prevent the Defendant from picketing Church of Scientology
premises located at Tustin and Hemet-in Riverqide Cou!)ty on September 6, 2008. -
The declaration of Florian,Schwarnert establishes.that during this matter, Plaintiff's attorney Moxon, and other
Church of Scientology officials, followed Defendant's counsel to Hamburg, Germany where Mr. Moxon threatened
two German State employees with litigation if they did not admit him to an international forum being addressed by
Defendant's counsel, and then aemanded they provide their passports and identification to him. -
Very disturbingly, and in a blatant attempt to obstruct justice herein, two officials from Scientology's O.S.A. -visited
Defendant's witness Garry Scarff ,at his home on the day preceding this filing. They insisted that they had to
talk with hlm, .they served him with a "Ceaseand Desist letter," Informed him that they had observed him twice
entering the. home office of Defendant's counsel herein -two days before this filing; and that they had
electronically monitored Garry Scarff's conversation with Defendant's counsel, In the back yard of his
home-offic~. Scarff Deel., 1)50 Berry Deel., 1111352-356.See generally, Berry Deel., 1)290-358, Exhibits E to H.
The manner of service of this action was itself calculated to intimidate and harass; Berry Deel., 1)359.
5.
LEGAL ARGUMENT
C.C.P. 527.6 provides an expedited procedure for Injunctive relief to persons experiencing harassment from
conduct and/or speech that serves "no legitimate purpose" such as the exercise of first amendment freedoms of
speech and assembly.
In essence, Defendant contends that Plaintiffs evidence was Insufficient to support the C.C.P. 527.6 restraining
order issued ex parte against him herein, that it therefore must be stricken pursuant to C.C.P. ~25.16 because It
was sought "primarily to chill the valid exercise of rights of freedom of speech," that the challenged :cause _of action
arose from protected activity .in connection with a public Issue, and that it has unjustifiably Interfered with his
"constitutionally protected activity," after being served with these proceedings on August 14, 2008 during a
peaceful group picket of the Church of Scientology office management building.
It is Y'ell establish_ed that .certain government property Is by.its very _nature a public forum; for example, the
sidewalks of Hollywood Boulevard, Ivar Avenue, Sunset Boulevard, L. Ron Hubbard Way, Fountain Avenue and
Franklin Avenue arid Bronson Street.
In Thomas v. Quintero, .126 cal.App. 4th 635, 646 (2005), the court held "that antlSLAPP motions may be filed
challenging petitions for Injunctive relief brought under'section 527.6." Plaintiff's Triaf Brief (p.1:26-28) sel'\'.ed
August 28, 2008. expressly concedes the relevant building,at 6331 Hollywood Boulevard houses only
"administrative offices;" the Church of Scien.tology International and. Religious Technology Center management,
legal and lntelli ence o:.:,:ffi:,c:e:s:_
___ .:..---------------...:..----------....
The church of Scientology does not have traditional church.services where a deity \s worshiped. Instead, !t has
pook stores and course rooms where members purchase and take courses, and engage in "auditing'.! (which
lndudes elements of hypnosis, mind control;.mental manipulation and coercive indoctrination) with a primitive form
of lie detector called an E Meter
.- onversely, in Thorria_s v. Quintero, Ibid: "The petition ai1~gedthat Quin!ero was among a group oi
people wh~o
appeared at Thomas's church, and who then harassed members of the congregation 'with the stated purpose of
causing extreme em~arrassment and severe emotionardistress to [Thomas].'
The petition went on :to explain that good cause existed to include members of ,Thomas's family within the
protection of the .orders requested because Quintero and others had also ~emonstrated at Thoma s's home, and
threatened to harass his family , thereby pl~cing themIn 'fear of their -security at home.'
It was.noted that Quintero had Indicated an intent ion to return to Thomas's church and home, with the effect of
disrupting church activities and Invading Thomas's fre'e'.exerclse of religion and right to privacy." Id. at 643.
In Thomas v. Quintero the court Initially granted a T.R.O. The matter was continued during which time "Quintero
filed a special motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute (425.16).'' Id. at 643. The court denied the special
tion to strike and d~nled a civil harassment re~st:ra~l:ni:n:g~o:rd~e:r~.
-~-:----------~------
The .DCA reversed and held that "antlSLAPP motions may be filed challenging petitions for Injunctive relief brought
under section 527.6, because they constitute 'causes of action' under the antiSLAPP law." Id. at 642. Section
425:16 -(b) (1) and (e) (3) provide In pertinent part:
...A cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of that person's right of
petition or free speech ... In connect ion with a public issue ... shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless
the court determine _s that the plaintiff has established that there Is a probability .that the plaintiff will prevail on the
claim .... As used in this section; 'act In furtherance of a person's right of.petition or. free speech ..: in connection
with a_publ_icissue' includes: ... (3) any written or oral statement or.writing made in a place open to the public or a
public forum In connes_tionwith an issue of public Interest."
The DCA further opined that: Under the statute, the court makes a two-step determination: 'First, _ the court
decides whether the defendant has made a threshold showing that the challenged cause of action Is one arising
from protected activity ...'If the court finds ~hat such a showing has been. made, It must then determine ' whether
th~ plaintiff has demonstrated a probability of prevailing upon the claim. :.. 'Only a cause of action that satisfies
both prongs of the antlSLAPP statute-1.e., that arises from protected speech or pe~itionlng.and lacks even
minimal merit....;ls a SLAPP, subject to be stricken under the statute.'" Citati(?nSomitted. Id. at 645.
The DCA also held that "[a] cause of action is subject to a motion to strike ... even if it Is based only part on
allegations Involving protected activity.'' Citations omitted. Id. at 653:
"While SLAPPsuits 'masquerade as ordinary law suits' the conceptual features which reveal them as SLAPP's are
6.
that they are generally merit less suits brought by large private Interests to deter common citizens from exercising
their constitutional rights or to punish them for doing so." :citations omitted. Id. at 658.
-The Thomas court, referring to Weinberg v. Feisel, 110 cal.App. 4th 1122 (2003), then set forth a "few guiding
principles ... from decisional authorities" as to what constitutes "an issue of public Interest."
"First, 'public interest' does not equate with mere curiosity. [Citations].
Second, a matter of public interest should be something of concern to a substantial number of people. Citations
omitted.... , -
Third, ther~ sllould be so111edegree of closeness between the challenged statements and the asserted public
interest (Citation omitted); ...
Fourth, the focus of the speaker's conduct should be the public interest rather than a mere effort 'to gather
information for another round of (private] controversy:'" Citations omitted. Id. at 658-659.
The Tl}omas court held that "the evldentiary showing made by [the plaintiff] was woefully inadequate." Id. at 662-
663. As In the [nstant case at bar, there was no evidence of any credible threat of violence or other conduct "that
serves no legitimate purpose" and there was no admissible evidence of "substantial emotional distress" being
caused by the defendant who was engaged in "protected speech." ...
"Even if the conduct was not constitutionally protected, [the defendant] was not engaged qualitatively In a "pattern
of conduct" as contemplated by the statute." Id. at 663. "The sole Issue is whether there Is clear and convincing
evidence that harassment, as defined by the statute, has occurred. (527.6, subd. (d))." Id. at 665. See also,
Flatley v. Mauro, 39 Cal. 4th 299 (2006), City of Los Angeles v. Animal Defense League, 135 Cal.App. 4th 606
(2006), Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc., v. Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty U.S.A., Inc., 143 Cal.App. 4th
1284 (2006), Terry .v. Davis Community Church,.131 Cal.App. 4th 1534 (2005).
Defendant's evidence herein makes the requisite prlma facie showing that "the plaintiff's cause of action arises
from the defendant's free speech activity." Church of Scientology v. Wollersheim, 42 Cal.App.4t~ 628, 646 (1996).
Defendant's evidence herein further establishes that his free speech activity at Issue herein is within the four
expressly enumerated and protected categories set forth in c:c:P. 425.16 (e)(3)&(4). It involved statements
"made in a place or a-public forum in connection with an Issue of public Interest" and "oth-er conduct In furtherance
of the exercise of ... the constitutional.right of free speech In conne_ctfon with a public issue or an issue of public
-Interest."
C.C.P. 425.16 (a) provides that the "section shall be construed broadly." Dowling v.Zimmerman, 85 Cal. App. 4th
1400, 1411 (2001). . -
DEFENDANT'SACTIVn:Y IS CONSTITUTIONALLYPROTECTE
Public Issue picketing 1san activity protected by the First Amendment, which has been made applicable to the
-States by the Fourteenth Amendment. Frisby _v. Schultz, 487 U.S. 474, l0lL. _Ed. 2ci 420 (1988) (holding that
restrictions on picketing are subject to careful scrutiny); NAACPv. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886, 909, 73
L. Ed. 2d 1215, 1233 (1982); Southwestern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad, 420 U.S. 546, 43 L. Ed. 2d 448 (197?)
Picketing Is an activity also implicating (ree speech rights pursuant to article I, sections 2 and 3 of the California
Constitution. Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center, 23 Cal.3d 899 (1979) aff'd sub nom. Pruneyard Shopping
center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74, 64 L. Ed. 2d 741 (1980):
Under current First Amendment analysis, the extent to which a defendant's rights of speech may be curtailed
begins with identifying the forum used by the _defendant' to communicate his or her message. In the case at bar It
Is exclu_sively the city streets and sidewalks. "It has been clearly established since time immemorial that city
streets ahd sidewalks are public fora:" Collins v. Jordan, 110 F. 3d 1363 (9th Cir. 1996).
"No particularized Inquiry Into the precise nature of a specific street is necessary; all public streets are held in the
ublic trust and a_re properly considered public fora.,, Frisby, f\87 U.S. at 481.
7.
.
Defendant's conduct Involved speecti "made In a place or a public forum in connection with an issue of public
-Interest" and "other conduct In furtherance of the exercise of ... the constitutional right of free speech in connection ,
with a public issue or an issue of public Interest/ Dowling v. Zimmerman, 85 Cal. App. 4th 1400, 1414 -1418
(2001) .,
Protected activity is not harassment. Plaintiffs appear to contend that unwanted criticism arid questions regarding
Scientology abuse, crime and fraud constitutes harassment. On the contrary, "[h]arassment" is a knowing and
willful course of conduct dlrected ,at a specific person which seriously alarms~ annoys or harasses the person, and
which se_rves no legitimate purpo_se." C.C.P. 527.6 (b). _
Significantly; C.C.P. 527.6 (b) (3) provides, In essence, that "constitutionally protected conduct" is a "legitimate
purpose". that "is not included within the meaning of course of conduct." This course of conduct, when It ~oes r:i_ot
Involve "constitutionally protected conduct," "must be such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer .
substantial distress, and must actually cause substantial emotional distress to the plaintiff." C.C.P. 527.6; Schraer
v. Berkley Property Owners Ass'n, 207 Cal.App. 3d 719 (1989); Schild. v. Rubin, 232 Cal.App. 3d 755, 763 (1991)
(there must be medical, psychological, or other evidence establishing that the "harassing" activity is the cause.of
"substantial emotional distress" within the meaning of C.C.P. 527.6 (b)).
There is no such admissible evidence in the case atbar. Furthermore, only natural persons can.seek relief under
C.C.P. 527.6 (b). Diamond View, Ltd. v. Herz, 180 cal.App. 3d 612, 618-619 (1986). Because Plaintiff is.
operating as the alter ego of the Church of Scientology, and two of its attorneys herein, there is no standing to
assert the instant claim. xxxx Deel., ,i20, Berry Deel., Exhibits D-H, Schwanert Deel., ,i,i 7-9;
"Course of co~duct" is defined as a pattern of co!lduct composed of a series of acts over a period oftlme however'
short, evidencing a continuity of purpose." C.C.P. 527.6 (b); see also; Leydon v. Alexander, 212 Cal.App. 3d 1, 5
(1989) (single Incident in which former city employee abused plaintiff and another employee could not meet
statutory requl~ements of course of conduct).
A trial court may not issue an injunction against harassment unless it finds by clear and convincing evidence that .
unlawful harassment already exists in fact. C.C.P. 527. 6 (d);.Scllraer, supra, 207 Cal. App. 3d 719. However, as
constltution~lly protected activity Is excluded from the meaning of"course of.conduct," (C.C.P. 527. 6 (b)), there
is no need to entertain the traditional inquiry as to whether clear and convincing evfdence. e~ist~ warranting
injunctive reli~f which "is rarely granted to restrain speech or publication." Weil & Brown, Cal. Practice Guide, Ci\,111
Procedure B_efor~ ~rial, 9: 708. ,
Plaintiffs have no right to be free from public criticism. The skeletal conclusory allegations that constituted-the
evidence in support of the Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order herein are totally silent as to the
specific content of the statements that constitute the alleged harassment.
- - C, ~,
However, itis . cle~r from the Defendant's evidence submitted herewith, although most of it is legally inadmissible,
that the alleged harassment Involved Defendant, along with dozens andfometlmes hunareds 'of others, taking
his/their criticism of Scientology abuse,.blackmail, bribery and fraud to _theeyes and ears of Scientology staff
members who are supposedly Homo Novls as Scientology's founder called them; human beings with super powers
over matter, energy, space and time and who can even mentally clear the side walks of.protestors with their
"Operating Thetan" powers and'ablllties.
If Scient9iogists see and hear protests outside their buildings then the credibility of the expensive Scientology .
Adv_ancedTechnology and SUP.er:powersmight be.questioned and._Sclenfology's book, course and auditing sales
adversely affected. For that reasons, picketers ofteri shout and anti scientology picket signs proclaim, "No OT
owers here otherwise we wouldn'fbe here."
In essence, the court is bem e .to e JO n arst Amendment activity that Scientology fears may
wake up its coercively indoctrinated members. They would then exit the organization, as happened at the'end
of "The Truman Show" movie. . .
However, cratIcIsm of Scientology to Individual Scientologlstsls not harassment as a matter of law. "No prior
decisions support the claim that the Interest of an individual In being free from public criticism of his business
practices in pamphlets or leaflets [or other forms of speech] warrants US\:!of the Injunctive powers of a court."
Organization for a Better Austin v. Ke_efe, 402 U.S. 415, 419-20, 2~ L. Ed. 2d 1 (1971).
In Organization for a Better Austin, members of an organization distributed leaflets In a residential community that
were critical of respondent's real estate practices. The distribution of the leaflets was on all .occasions conducted in
a peaceful and orderly man~er, did .riot cause any disruption of pedestrian or vehicula~ traffic, and did not
8.
-, . .. ' .
The Court noted that the fact that "expressions were Intended to exercise a coercive Impact on respondent does
not remove them from the reach of the First Amendment ... Id. at 420; see also NAACPv. Clairbome Hardware Co.,
458 U.S. 886,773 L. Ed. 2d 1215, -1234 (1982) ("Speech does not lose.its protected character, however, simply
~barrass others or coerce them Into acti~n?.
The applicable law Is clear, the Scientology en erprise cannot constitutionally prevent others from delivering
deprogramming messages and institutionally embarrassing information to its members and staffers on the public
sidewalks.
Fre_espeech includes offensive speech. It is dear that what the Plaintiffs, as the alter egos of the Scientology
, enterprise, and Its attorneys herein, contend Is that offensive speech Is the reason for the lnj(inctive relief obtained
herein. That is wrong. "First, It is important to recognize that, '[l]ike so many other kinds of expression, picketing is
a mixture of conduct and communication." NLRBv. Retail Store Employees, 447 U.S. 607, 618-619 (STEVENS J.,
concurring in part and concurring ti:i result).
"[A] communication may be offensive In two different ways. In epen ently of the message the speaker Intends to
convey, the form of his communication may be offensive - perhaps because It is too loud or too ugly In a particular
1settlng. Other speeches, even though elegantly phrased In dulcet tones, are offensive simply because the listener
,' disagrees with 'the speaker's message." Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Service Comm'n of New York, 447 U.S.
./ 530, 546-547 (STEVENS, J., con urring In judgment) (footnotes omitted).
The authorities also hold that the state cannot justify restrictions on peaceful expres~ion on the basis of the
offensiveness of the message and conduct to some viewers. "The fact that society may _find speech offensive Is not
a sufficient reason for suppressing it.
Indeed, if It is the speaker's opinion that gives offense, that consequence is a reason for according It constitutional
protection." Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of New York State Crime Victims BD., 502 U.S. 105, 118 (1991).
Emphasis added. Similarly, the Supreme Court has also determined that "[f]reedom of speech cannot be made
subject to prevailing notions of taste or preferences for particular forms of expression.
_A_s long as the me~ns ar~ peaceful [as they were here], the communication need not meet standards of
acceptability." Organization for a Better Austin v.-Keefe, 402 U.S. 41S, 419, 29 .L. Ed. 2d 1,(1971). The U.S. _
Supreme Court was even stronger In Schenk v. Pro Choice Network of Western New York, 519 U.S. 357, 137 L. Ed.
.2d 1 (1997): "Aswe said in Madsen, quoting from Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 322, '[a]s a general matter, we have
indicated that in public debate our own citizens must tolerate Insulting, and even outrageous, speech in order to
provide adequate breathing space to the freedoms protected by the First Amendment." Emphasis added.
c.C.P. 425.16 (c) provides that ''[i]n any action subject to subdivision (b), a prevailing defendant on a special.
motion to ~trike shall be entitled to recover attorney's fees and costs." The amount is within the court's discretion.
Dowling v. Zimmerman, 85 Cal. App. 4th 1400, 1426 (2001).
Indeed, In Church of Scientology v. Wollersheim, 42 Cal.App. 4th 628 (1996), Plaintif('s attorney _hereinwas one of
the counsel unsuccessfully arguing that the trial court's award of C.C.P. 425.16 (c) attorney's fees In the amount
of.$130,506.71 was excessive. Mr. Moxon was also ordered to pay the attorney's fees on appeal. Id. at p. 659.
In Ketchum v. Moses, 24 Cal. App. 4th 1122 (2001) the D.C.A. was considering the trial court's C.C.P. 425.16 (c)
attorney fees award of $140, 212.00 which Included a lodestar amount of $70,106.00. The D.C.A. upheld the fee
and lodestar amounts. The amount of Defendant's Fees and Costs claim herein currently exceeds $10,000.00 and
will be updated and detailed by Supplemental Declaration.
III. CONCLUSION
For the -foregoing reasons, Defendant'~ C.C.P. 425.16 -(b) (_1) motion should be granted.
Respectfully submitted,
Graham E. Berry,
Attorney for Defendant Donald xxxxx
9.
FD-395 (Rev. 2-28-97)
ADVICE OF RIGHTS
1 __,.U~L'---
Place -=~~~=wA.~.-t...;;..tf~
ALL rnF0PHATIOM cm ITAINED Date --=-'-=-o~/1_.3/'--+-/-=t1_....,Y,__
__ _ b6
HEREH.I I S UWCLASSIF IED Time __ ,_1:.t_;_;~~~U_;./._~....;_
__ _ b7C
DATE 04 - 2 0 - 2012 BY 60322 UCLP/PLJ/JI.I
YOURRIGHTS
...-
-
'" )f Y9l!.'.~ect~e.
answenng~tany time. '
.t!i~
p~~}.l!,Y?l!il!lYe
!2 ~~~F-~qu~SU9J.ltD<L~:witl}9ut~:!.~~~r .ri~J !)\"t9-!1
"' ..._
~
.-
WAIVEROFRIGHTS
Signed
Time: ---t-7..._,
-""3-+-{-1-{1.=--ri1l..--
___ _
.'J
U.S. Department of Justice
FederalBureauof Investigation
b6
b7C
7
' Dat_e
,'
' :-;--
c_:...-~-1-.,-
............
,__,..._.,_._....,....,...__._._
_____,____..;..._......,...,._,.
__ . --------- -,-=--.~--~
.,__
-----
ALL IUF0PHATIOM COIITAINED
HEREIM I S IDJCLASSIF IE D
DATE 04 - 20 - 20 1 2 BY 60322 UCLP / PL J /JM
- - ----- ------ ----~
I
-~--+-lf-----'-----------------------..:..~-1~~-:
. ----
i' . _;fr
'
.
tf}~5 _. 4,1. i ,
,_.-----tt--~--- _o-=-~--/4~,A.,,
1" - ~L{#,N -___.;.r;-::-~-__;_r__.;..
r.. ~--~-.;i;/_., ~::: __ __;_ _____ _
,------++--____, .....
;.J,
__
;.-=~=#
_ _.-L..;:_A-~1'P;.,_.;;.6
__
S _-,--- ___<__ ~G ~ 1. d/ a de.. 1&:;;...
----"---"-. __
. ,,Ve..,J.:,:
1------t+-'~.;.,..~--h.....; ....;;.f..;.:.;"/k.,;...4;....
.5::..,;.-
_ __,.....;\:,...).f.t-;t,..;..r/..;._.
_-__;;._-,--...;;.~-:--=~.....;'l)::..,.-_'_~__;,'C-/...;..'11'.=;.&,_t:::>....;.,./;_,---'-_.:,A~'n~(<
__ I
1...;._ _____
. ,~"'1 ?-
____,;--4-;...,;_ __
/)
l-("v~-(?"-
_,;._ ___ '/11,)t::?1.
_,v_:..;;;..:.;V~_..;.;.._ ______
/I / ----1.1.,.;;..,.,-
___,,.;.~W~-_;;;J--J-o,....:..--i,f-L~r-r~v~.- /A
..;;.;):~~~"----1
. , /' - .
,;.,
_..;._..:..~~()~~:-,-'l...;,._...:,_1._
~c,:::..__(..1)=re=c-.;;..;()=-...,._----- ;..;._: ~_r_-
-_"_,....
-,--:c._..-v:_h.-,--w._- ...;.._..;_L_c-o__::...t_'A.l.....:;...
t.,,..,;_/;;....:-.>---
., -
cc-,t-l.
__~r/t</' I A.l'A
.
_<,,Ii' rd -
-Cos
I -
\
I'--
) ..
- -
I /c-,,f O,
1.;.;;."----H-,,_.,_;t//,'-1.4'/
_ _,_./~ /-).v"-v la ICf ~,,ii o~_lr.=:-v1_._1_1
-----,-------
- - ----
'
I
I
'
I
I
,
/l.,- A)~..&..::, G~/4tf~.A-t.c!.J De, ) -
- A.vr .;J,.C/~tb-
CLMJ-4;, o I Co~ .. - - /A.J ~1:
.Ci,_ C
A"'vAl"'T'~,.,
,,,, fbctc.seJ. {!05.
-
. -
.. Srlfi't? tJ.,.) t:;J1.1-e.' (/
r~ cti,4/-,,.J-t'
I r/- 0 _<'/<::ffeM./' )
- t~/f //4-<J.51A-5C ( 0 .,J IJ
c.J.12 ~t/? s
- .
: 11.,~,rz /
-
Dw~-r ci~/ld"' ~~-e,
,~f~- ... ~ -
-Gc/4,/
/44,P/V)t,
- 'U'(Mc--fl}tpfdrr:
~
; [/C/i-V
_
0-c/,
;Ver
Cc.4
Den l..,ue.,
-c
-r;
. _/4..r~6$'/
--
lft/
_
t,J/4HC:--
CAsc:7(_...
S,t<
)
lo-5
r' t:,4-S~
... 17
- CJ..J(/= ~- k., U $'_e' I r;_
<:...t!t.c;.: :ru V..v /4,~ s,r-c:-,
,
. - 1), o~/1 f~/1.
ft~ 1/7,rr<:; I ,.J PDos (,v J~j__,~t
..
= ~--ue,
;).NW.> e1r 4-rr.11.YL_)-.r>.L?-"'-f c,- ~
_;;;
-t"f/!V (J~ ~<.
- -'1-
~5
=-J::J. A, :r
~rtA ... {1-]) Lef/u- v.J. l111 ,-v-/4--7.
.- Ii) -
' -
. 2.
' - ~-
. -- -
..
- - -
- --
-
,
. - -
-- -- ------
: -
. .
- ->
.
~- -
- /It);- 'f.fffliAc !t,t? /-ft.J - . 4},;t -~ .Gr_x_ C.;,-A{:"--
.
/!Jr~. . .. -
. ..
>
- /,J1n}if' /{;wO/;'t1 7 .
l/,-.'"',f-(1,-
r) &~
~
C,cD 1-e:~.
S J'l,e~5
AC:,fr ) -
.
. - -- .-
('/,..,._,~ qu-r /1,ttJJ (,1) ,4,. f:tl, R~~c~ -
. '-
I
-
I
- - -
~
-fl~,D~O -VA_;-..,<.,
i"JL .#-elll.GA/ 6+ G_.IUII~ g~&f
.- .. . . . -
9,/4/?tN
~J ;--
G~? -. . ~tt;c:O -,.::tA
'- 1~i:l ''"-C.-
r{;'.; c...
0;Y
.- ..
..
. .
. --
.
...~
C:'C,,,,.,..,c.<Ae, /4,z G~ti:/et,O
.
1-~s
"
.
.
- 5t-A-T<:::--r'J
. .k~p_.;/4.vr d-rr1ct 5
/,.,IL
I
. s,rowc.-"o ~. r1;t
- 5~,) ,c,.....,
"':=1.<:::;r? W eli 1~ . t,A./1 f-t~U-~
-
-~
I
t4,,., ,_h,~1. .f,,V-~- tJ~/1,r, R/
. h.em1..
'
.
.. . -
- .
-
3.
'
. ' - - . " --
-- .
-- -- --
b6
.. b7C
- ~/k-{f lrc.11e-
r_ r ,,s
7
.--;:it.,.,,,p
o,N~<( i~:r Sucv.1.1 , -
.
- /
l,,J /,.,.-,
I
.
3/2 Z jy&, .
I '
L5Jj_ ~ <l'2, - 3oY 2:::
r:,' tJ_,,.G
Dllc-t/ ,Ive-
.
.
q1Lf,l-9o7- - ~/L{(J
C) r<-IS---2-
(c)
--J(,,,tL
J~
t"'t-
'f'_
..
-- I (c -
-Et) -
~. - 5-
\,
-"-t-.,,L,?, I
!
4.e:t-~1f- I I
. Q_ Yc-,M
s -e1i~cr-
.
-
.
--
~
.
,,
~~ I /-y-13:, I I
( '
11/,t? 'I
Gec,1/l.ol' #r I
r' a~r1 L .-
I
i:bjJ I
. '. . 4.
.[i)
. . ,
~
- -
FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95)
- -I-
Date of transcription 10 / 15 / 2 0 0 8
birth_! __ ___,
,.w,.-'-'----~f
residing at
cellular telephone b6
nurnber..,_ __ -=----~was interviewed at the Newark Field Office of b7C
the Fe era Bureau of Investigation, 11 Centre Place, Newark, New
Jersey. After being advised of the identities of the interviewing
Agents and the nature of the interview,! provided the
following information:
by ANONYMOUSat
the protest
fbe cos in New Yorj City.
fra, _____________ attended
I the
!had learned
protest with
about
both
b6
b7C
I -
._ __ __.!described ANONYMOUSas a leaderless organization
with the common goal of bringing a stop to the "crimes and abuses"
perpetrated by COS. Although he thinks ANONYMOUShas focused on
other entities or activities, since at least December 2007 there b6
b7C
focus was on COS. ANONYMOUShas a lot of members but has very
little control over their activities. Most of ANONYMOUS's
activities include spamming COS websites and posting "nonsense" on
websites such as channel Bon www.4chan.com. I ~oes not think
that ANONYMOUSis focused on COS anymore.
I I
stated that as I he is I
familiar with what a DDOS attack is and has seen how much damage
such an attack can cause. I !denied participating in any of b6
the DDOS attack activity that occurred against the COS in January b7C
or February 2008. I !further stated that no IP address
activity related to the DDOS attacks would link to him.
288A-LA-249816
I office I
telephone._ _____ ___.
by!
In January and February, I
~ an IT solutions
!believed he was emplo~
company, located
rl """""'......_--------,_~ .....,..t_e
__ I
l_e_p..Jhone l His boss was I inL__J
!LNU.
bG
b?c
(Rev. 05-~1-2008)
,.~
UNCLASSIFIED
-
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Drafted By: _
___:p;--
Case ID #: 2 8._~_A ___
2_4_9_8
_1_6_..,.3-=-rN,..-(
P_e_n_d_i_n_g_)_,
Title: UNSUB(S)
CHURCHOF SCIENTOLOGY- VICTIM
Computer Intrusion
00:LA
UNCLASSIFIED
To:
Re:
Los Angeles
288A-LA-249816,
From:
UNCLASSIFIED
Newark
10/15/2008
LEAD (s) :
LOS ANGELES
AT LOS ANGELES, CA
UNCLASSIFIED
2
. . .
.. ~
'
i't\ .- . , .. , -- .
;
J_
. ~ . I
). .;,. . ,,,,.
,,, , .'J,1, ~
''
"
,
~- >
...
'.
{). 0 - . ,
- '
,, F~340(R CV. 4-11-03)
"..... '
tA1' - .
'
From
- . I ,:~~~~:~."'~"'"
I
(Address) ..
. '
b6
b7C
-
,
...
.
'
...,
. ..
(CityandSt~tc)
L
,I
By_
I ,
,
;
'
,
ToBeR etumed
-1
Yes D i2rNo
ReceiptGiven Yes D B"No
GrandJury Material-DisseminateOnlyPursuantto Rule6 (e) .. J .
'
.
FederalRulesof CriminalProcedure 1-
} ,
Yes D CTNo '( . .-
FederalT axpayerInformation(Fri) \
".. '
'
D Yes. . -El'No
,,, '
Title:
,.;J'
_,.
uN,u\5(>) '
/1 x.: lofoejy- _vi'c.f~ . '
'"
c.~~J(.~ ,t.-,
b6
'
- --- \- b7C
-
(?
(~-dr"
l l <.._
- - , z ~ ~\ - ..
--. -- ....,..
-;,.,u .-.... ~ '
,......,....~
)1!
- ,
,
. \ .
;o.-"""'~,:,l--.-..
--:~
-- ~
-~_ "'II
b6 :l
i-- ---1L----~-----' -Jj :.~1;-J-1,~__ __ _ _ __ _ b 7C 1
1--=-s-- "'- _ _ _ lk_ ~{},;H', __ cf;_,)SS[_J__.Lf_ (_.HtJL]., 7~}PtJJ_ _
~~ -~- A1lilv~_-\::~
-~'=> ~L{l-O(!r. -~~-5 ~ - - --!
I ~4~ - _A_ whY'. :s~c1f--. _ _
~~ -
1
-- -- - ~~ -
--------------~o~----------'l .!1
_,I
' '
.
r'
~-
....
- ,_..f
-..,_
>---- .::i
-=........--_,...... __ ,......,...;_......,_________
--...- --
_L
-- - -
-------.:,..~--,.---.
). 1 1fII .U,
>' ,1~
...
.
';,
,, 0 O
FD-340(Rev.4-11-03)
:::R-ec-ei-ve-d,====:=L...-==
......
C-==-:::.._:=-==-~=-~=-rn,=-te1v=-:~=---.ee):1============
'
(Address) .. b6
b7C
(City:indSlate) ~
To Be Returned,1 D Yes D No
ReceiptGiven D Yes D No
GrandJury Material-DisseminateOnlyPursuantto Rule6 (e)
FederalRulesof CriminalProcedure
,. /
i,:
JJ D Yes D No 'I,
FederalTaxpayerInfonnation(FTI)
0' Yes ONo
Title:
\)N ?\)~[S)
C.l.-u-tc.,L- 6' ~~\1<17y
Co-po\v ~~,~
Reference: ------------.....&...-----'l---=3;..::a),:::;.....;.._
___ _
(Communic:ition.Enclosing
M:iterial)
, I b6
Description: rn/Originalnotesre interviewof b7C
- -.--
-- --
... - - -
\
\
' . I ' 1 "- ~ - -
00000000 000
---
___,H
~- - ~ -- - - --- -- --
..._....,......-=-'l....._
__ i .. . \0 '7../
---=------~
-~-~c.-:--~~ ~~-~~--~-fW--~~L~--~
~~ .. 1
with the
Church o..:.-~c~1-=-=e~n:""'!:"'==~~-~=-=~'=":l=-=-=~:-:--:~r-::=-=---r-:e:"'T"e=p=-:o~n~e=--.-~1so
on the b6
conference call was for the Church of b7C
Scientology ("COS"). Ater a vised o the ideptity of the
interviewing Agent and the of the interview,_[ __ __.~rovided
the following information:
by b6
-L--------__J.-------------------------------
b7C
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency;
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.
~I p'1..o~~
-I 1-s.e,1..
FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95)
- 1-
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
b6
b7C
/4
by ________
......._ ________________________________ _
......_ b6
b7C
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency;
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.
ot tl& -1
~. \ ... ' ..
~. ,> I
'' lt
;.
0 :-
FD-340(Rev.4-11-0J{
. File Number ~ A-
:::Z. l.-A-- I~
""2-"1.1( b6
b7C
.....
Field Offi.ce Acquiring Evidence -----=~:;...:..A.;.____;._...;;_
_______ _
Serial# of OrigJnating Document -~------,Y- __
-...:....J_,__
_____ ....;...
__ _
Date Received- ~
\ I / z.,'5/<)
..
From
--------- '
'
--
z~
- ~(ty andSlate)
t By ----',----I
'1
D D
To Be Returned
ReceiptGiven Yes D No
Yes
D
No
;'
J
Grand Jury Material- DisseminateOnly Pursuant'toRule6 (e) )
(
FederalRulesof CriminalProcedure - ALL INF0Pl-lA T I0N cm rrAHIED
HEREIN IS U!i.TCLASS I FIED
D Yes D No DATE 04 - 2 0- 2012 BY 60322 UCLP/PL, J /,JN
FederalTaxpayerlnfo~tion (FTI).
D Yes D No
Title: ..JN5o ('}{J,)_
L\.-,.v1.(."- o'-so>""\-ll<it')y
rv\-U ;c.,...,.\.,.15,'o""'
Lu ...... .
Reference:
oo,t..~ -I ----lsc>'-
(
(Communication
Enclosing
Material)
i
t
{
---
f.
Descrip~on: ig/ Originalnotes re int~rviewof
. '
t l
). ,. - ,
-
" ,,-
-
~-
A'
' . \
' \.
t .
- - ~ - __
w~JJd__,~~- 0.L(l_ ,,t,)____~
-C te.~~_
--~~(k:....__..__ -L- __~l
-_~G.~~ --~~ --- ~{/&!._:h~
~~~- -_.........(~~Y _c -- '-'~----F-~~...Y.c -~C_(~J~')(_d_
_____j/V><-( --- -
t_:c~td fc>:k--J/&_--
_;.:.. __;: __e~!-~.J_~
o_vk - ~?----
-- ?C --- ktJ_L
....
--~~(.,
- .. l : 4 '~--..c-i--.c_.l-~~ ----a,
-- -- . ._- tA~ t-
u.e::b..&~'?_,'b~_-. ._. ..,:: -. --_-V''"'-
- .
1.
b6
b7C
~-~- ~-
- -uls:- - -~_()_: _- -- - - ir2
_-_~-z :: '-'fl'-~..........
_~~- - -
~~-- --./~- O
. ~-- ..........:: ~L~tr~O '_ ~tk!L~_ li!"t~~- - ~
l
~-~ ------
-~---- ----=
--- ~.J_c..,~ . -- ~J "4 --.. --
---~~~- ~:-:_
_ _e.,:1-;:hL
<- , ..-0-~aLck~------
/-1~-,.y:__1..cl ,.
-~-~ --~~
- - ---vt.w::s\1 ~ -0-
___~~ r.J~:1:'~--C,?4Y.___ck,:~'....,_
_._ _._-,
~---cb.1-s-\,,..L _ ~~_k..,, t- . ~r
~~-~- .-W.U.t~:..l._ ~
- ...U-,~ - -4ll.
_,
~--J2.<ri-v~~l-ht.~
0-~ - ~~l-~--r:;_~f
__- --- -
2.
.
,.. 1. 21:octdt:1 :Wtffln " t _............_ .
:j
'i
~'t.6 y
'lo!-.. "
FD-340(Rev.4-11-03) 1A1 D
File Nuiiiber A__ -_7--_L{_q...._f?.;..;;\(o:..----------
--_.,;;a'2-_i""""'q,'--{\~-.....;(;._.;.
_
- feld O(tice-Acquiring ,Evidence ......-~~ -::::L:::.-!..::~~
~.
f, - . 4 41"
-~~_.,...,......,,_,.~;.--===-:-'!"~:---=-=-
r ,.- ~
Ser._al # of Ori~ijlatlng DO-C\!ment----------------- ~
Date Received - i-1'f (~'1
From-~~~~,- -.... -=.~
.. ===~==
..==-----
,.
'
'. ..
..
I (Cityand Stat~) ALL INF0@-1:ATION CONTAIMED
HEREIN IS TJ1JCLASSIFIED
By ---......,.---1 DATE 04-20-2012 BY 60322 TJCLP/PLJ/JN
To Be Returned
'D Yes
',I.!
ReceiptGiven D Yes ~o I'
/
GrandJury Material- DisseminateOnly Pursuantto Rule6 (e) 1
'tf
FederalRules of CriminalProcedure ,,. . ,.
DYes
FederalTaxpayerInformation(FTI)
~o ' t, ' .
.,. b6
....
r
. D Yes ~ -- .. b7C
,
Title:
U Nfo \)(!, '>
'?Y
C1-.v1ct- OV Sc..\'-"\bl,
(ll,.,.Vol.e.) T.,-.\.,J!.~v
.......
t Refere11ce:___ __:t.._"-----1'
w ca..._ ...so~
__ _, I~1.....
os=ing:::;;..M_:it-en-at)-
-------
.j
- __ o_ri_g
_n_e-sc_r_ip__~_n=
__ ~_ iT
..... noiesreiotcivlew
of
. !{ .
' .
; ~- .
' ;t
': ~.
~-.
'F ' ~. ~ - (J4_
.,.-~ "'( - . - ..,_ - - - _,.,..... ..
\
\
---.-., __
_ __ _.....:~
6:,=lf:v'.~~:
::.__~~~~~...=.~q.-..-~
,~ le~_
---...... _--
- _....,.
__
_ _.r.,,..G(G
e> l(_ ___ l. _ fe .L._o {.- -~
__ ,...,,,...___, .. ~~
- "---"-<.,.. ,..,s.,s_~~ ....- p~~~t[.c- --
'
~-..----.--__,,,
~
~~~ , . __ -
_-,...;;~
_ t ALL INF0PJ,lAT:0NC.:O!iITAHIED
- - HEREIN IS UloJLLA;:,;:,IFIED -=-
. __
- ~~us _ _12~ ' DATE 04 - 20-2012
,Le"'-_'~~~
BY 60322
-'-~
TJCLP/PL,J/,JN
_ _
- -~----' """ J .~~.$.. . ...a.Jv_
__Fksu_>4~ - - .
.. ~k.,~~-h>&'--feeJ ~l~ _(~./'- - -
--~ -----l-J.-Sc.~ --- 6f p.f::-~d - _ ~r!~r~-~~
:::-=~---Lu--i-\_;.-=,'-c ~ /".t-~u ~<I -~ <-I~~--_ t._
~-,.,.____,.
---~-
~ ':~L-:~~
I~~L;::ls~
-_
.,,...,._....__
__ c...,._.,,.
, _~~ ............... ~~~~-7-~d---- ----
~~- -~vp -- - -- - - ::--- --=--~
--------=------
---=-~
, 65~~ -__~5 la<.~v.k?~ 4--:-5___ .
_ Cvf _ - c' CoLl- ----~c_
- _6{j,_,J-1.~~~
__w./- _cq:5_ _ _-:--_- -~- g~c~~ri::-! -~ __0).d_
-_c C-<i}(~ ~
_ __
_ __vu. __,~r,__xY- _-~ ~ / l~~--'-.J_/ _/ YS _-
-_ . - \pJQ~~ ----_-- - - -- -~ - - - - - - - - - -+ - -- -- - -
-- - I 1. .
--~ -~ .;L 6-(,.- ~~~ ___9--kL __ ...,, 0,(1/.r-;i.
~ ~~0- -
~2.- ?YWJ / 1~,. v'vL..i~~ 5<-l1~ 7U Y
,e,, ... ...... ~ ,-, ...
J"'t-e \--I:1 ~ k,..,,-lt_
\{w-v.1,;1v~ (l\h \tt.i .. '\:; ~f2ktvt--
,._ ~
, ~ "" ,-. ~ ~ ,.-, ,-., ' ... ... - - - ., _, .. ~~ ,-.,
,_:_ ~ ~ ~-
_- -~--- ---~-:~,,
--- - -~-:?./
:cf(~7~~
~ J~.f-6-9-t-L:.J,
____
~-.-- fi51-:__7'5C
:-_--:()~(~ _- -_
-
--~"- ~- - ~~-~
.. - - -~~--~~-
-\2,~ -""i~~q;'- ~)~~ - ~>lc..~-Go-"'-- --
- ._ - - . - -,-__ - - _. -
,a.f:__5-"~(e~ -- __- --~
_ _-__L ___,~L_
~- -- ~ - 5._g,~..IJ~L-vr:7:_
. : . -. _: --:-?~(J~-4~
...___ic>~5""li>f2
_, $11?:r.J.,
.., --- -.
------- -~~~oJ:::"
=--
L~'-- -- ~J~~--=--~~ ~:J-~ - ~
-~~ ----~- -- _ --:~~c~ -,-
fqk'rf-~ ----- -
~--- ~~- -:'- _r CL~J=~:~!d- i, ~ - /:_4'~-L~ - ~ 1
_
-- - ----~ - ~- -- - - e..:h.id
:-G-<-'-L~s __ _ __
_____
_ . _ -~--- .,<-_C:-~11.J~
,,_~-- ~1i __ -":V~w
____ _
_ ___ _ _-~\I v .- l~U--'==- -~'-- -~--
' . -- --
----- ~ - - - . - LQS_..~~--~ C ...~~-:kst-~V
f?241~ -
----~ - -~ ~-:ub , ~-CCLS~--- ~:
_-_ - _--- _-~o.., - ~--c:-: I 1 - -
-~-~..,..._...;.....,............~--
-- . I
-- ,-~-~~~~ .
L t,. ,,,..., ,,._
1
(,.;
~c.--VY-"TC:l
--_ ,J_,
.-
.
-~~~-----=----_
\Ill,~-~~'--4...,.
_~___,;,__.;L1~~~~~
~l:~
2.
-
l
.
j
~
~,.. .,, ... ~";/ ,1"'
"-~! :,.. w
__, , :, ~ f
. ,(,_:,t..j
... ,U'/X,-.,
~
.... ,
.. __
i.,,. t >ttrtt1:rrt:b
.1 FD-340(Rev.3-8-01)
o 1
iUnivcrsalCue File Number ;) 8g/1--l14 ...~ 'I <:j'i'tCD
.....;;..-~~-....;...__,;~--------
..Field OfficeAcquiringEvidence--O~fr"1_
__________ __ b6
Serial# of OriginatingDocument ______________ _ b7C
DateReceived 2'.'.:-
J. J - C) 4'
From lL______________ .,.........,......,.....-J----~-:---
.(NamcoFContnlnitor)
,._
0: (AddressofContn'butor),
~ .:rr-~. A/L-
By j___________
ToBe ReturnedD Yes ~
y____
______
ReceiptGiv~ : D Yes ~o
Federal
RulesofCriminal
OnlyPursuant
Grand1uryMaterial-Disseminate
Procedure_/
to Rule6 (e)
1
/
D Yes E:rNo ALL IN F0PJ-rATI0N cm rr AnJE D
HEREIN IS U!i.TCLASSIFIED
FederalTaxpayer {Fl1) ,/
Information DATE 04 - 2 0- 2012 BY 60322 UCLP/ PL,J /,JN
D Yes ~No '
..
"' '
Title: cJ)V .f V /3
Co- f1v~ :::r::::;..;J7o..Js,
~ ,J
~ D notesreinterview
Original of
f
l
t) b :::rSvt1P~ S~ t>-
b3
:(
,{
L=:==-=--=--=----
___
-_________ 4_~.
2_Cf---,OJ_
\
\\ _,
\
..........
\
\
~AOl 10 (RC\',04/07)Subpoenalo TestifyBeforeGrandJury
UNITED-STATESDISTRICTCOURT
CENTRAL. DISTRICTOF CALIFORNIA
TO: b3
b6
b7C SUBPOENATO TESTIFY
BEFOREGRANDJURY
SUBPOENAFOR:
!83PERSON a DOCUMENT(S)
OR OBJECT(S)
~ t
YOU AREHEREBY-COMMANDEiYtoappearattdtestffybeforethe GrandJury or"tfe UnitedStates District .
j
PLACE COURTROOM
0 Pleasesee additionalil![o_rm'!_iio11
011 reve!:S,'!
This subpoenashall remain in effect ;mtilyou arc grantedleaveto departby the courtor by an officer acting on
behalfof the com1.
Cl.ERK DATE
April 15,2009
(By) Dcpu~y_q~k _ _
Terry Nafisi, Clerk of Court
-1I
.........,......,......."t' ~ PHONENU~BEROFASSISTANT
::-:--..:...-,:F .U.S.A~1'0RNIW
This subpoenais issuedon appliealion
of the UnitedStatesof ,\incrica AssistantUnitedStatesAttorney b6
312 N. SpringStreet b 7C
THOMASP. O'BRIHN l.os Angeles,California90012
UnitedStatesAttomc Tele hone:(213) 894-2231
Ifnotapplicable,enter"none".
-;o,-- - -
.__
TELi ____
AGl"lNJsA
__.
1 NOTE:An agentof theFBI willdeli\'ertheabove-mentioned document(s)
to the GrandJury shouldyou
desirevoluntarilyto surrenderthemto theGrandJuryin admnceof theGrandJurydate indicatedabo\'e.
,
AOI 10 (Rev. 04/07) Subpoenato TestifyBeforeGrandJury
... - - - - - - ~RETURN OF SERVICE0 > - - - -- _,._ -- - - - --- -
DATE PLACE
RECEIVED
BY SERVER f-/~-J O O '} G/l,ffvlJ:IS ~,v ./j 1 f\}r;_
DATE PLACE
SERVED
1/-J.~-d- DO9 b~. .IS~} Jt/'i---
SrVED ON(PRINTNAME! - ~-- -- -- __ ;;.- --- .=- - - ~ - - -
SERVEDBY (PRINTNAME)
I TITLE b3
b6
b7C
s~C,c111-l- A- bt:,Afr; Hz
- - ..... _,.,,..- - -
TRAVEL
.
- -
I
.STATEMENT.OE
SERVICES
SERVICEFEES- -
'TOTAL
- - -
OF SERVER<2'
DECLARATION
I declare under penaltyof perjuryunderthe lawsof the UnitedStatesof Americathat the foregoinginfonnation
containedin the Proof of Serviceis true and correct.
r-~.2~.J oo 9 - -
- . -- - - f-
Executedon
DATE ~I\JI'</-\ I UKr.. ur ;)City C.K (/
Jo:J !",-
t,,.J. :J/IJJJ
ADDRESS
OFSERVER
~ :IS kN IJI /It l,fgoJ I
I
ADDITIONAi,INFORMATION
- ~- ~- -- - -- - -..- -- ~ _.... - ., - -- - .- , 4~--~-l-
.
.,.=.- - -- - -- - - - - - - .,.. - . - -- - - - -
- - - - -~ -- - -- - ~ -- -- ....... .- - ~ ~ - ;c.
- -
.(I) As 10 \\ho mar servea subpo.:naand 1hcmannerof its scr\'iccsecRulel7{d),FederalRulesof CriminalProcedure, or Rule-IS(b).federalRulesofCMI
Procedure.
(2) ..fees and mileageneednot be tenderedto the \\ilncssuponsmiceof a subpoenaissuedon behalfof 1heUnitedSlatesor an ofliccror agencythereof
(Rule4S(b),fedml RulesofCi\'il Procedure;Ruic17{d).rcderalRulesof CriminalProcedure) or on behalfof certainindigentpartiesand criminal
defendants\1hoarc unable10pa}'such costs(28 USC1825,RuleI7(b)Fcdml Rulesof CriminalProcedure)".
..
...
-. ..
-Serial# of OriginatingDocument _SD
______ ___
p{
f '
~-.
From L-----..J----------------=--
(Nam, ofCOnlributor/Intmicweo) ~.
~
~
b6 '
;; .
i b7C
(Admss) '
<
l~ '
(CityandStato)
. .
'
By
.
,...
Title:
ALL INFOPl-rATION CONTAINED
HEREIN IS UlJCLASSIFIED
DATE 04 - 2 0- 20 12 BY 60322 UCLP/PL, J /,JN
Refe:ence: I
(Communicatio11EnclosingMatmal)
~1
,
,,
,: Description: D Originalnotesre interview
of i .
. ~~ JY6/)ren(-\
[etleo,IGva~
l
"""
_,.. ~
( !(JA' '=
'ii \ I l
.,_- .......
~
1119".;,....,_.,,...,-....;,:,._
~I
;,,,., - ...
-. --
\
\
\
\
~0110 (Rev.04/07)Subpoena10 TestifyBcforcGr~J1d
Jury
SUBPOENAFOR:-
181PERSON a DOCUMENT(S)
OROBJECT(S)
PLACE COURTROOM
UNITEDSTATESCOURTHOUSE 1346
312.N. Spring Street DATEANDTI_Mg
'Los Angeles~California90012 September2, 2009 @ 8:30 a.m,
'
0 :Pleaseseeaddi(iondl
- ' .
ilyomfation
. ' . 011reverse.
., . -
CLEIU-. DATE-
August5, 2009
(By)DeputyCle k
Terry Nalisi, Cler~ of Cslllrt Ii /1:
-IP ADDRESSAN PHONBNUMBEROF~\SSISTANT
U.S.A'rl'ORNHY-
This subp~cna is is.sued011appl_ic~lion
of the UnitedStatesof America AssistantUnitedStates~omey b6
312 N. SpringStreet b 7C
THOMASP. O'QRIEN J,osAngele~,Ctjlifl,,mi;i
90012.
UnitedStatesAllomc Tele 1honc::(213)&9.J-2231
1r1101.ipplkoble,enter"none~.
'
l_
,,
' ,c.,J
;.,.,
:
A-rM$, :t'o>Jf.\ St>0/1..f
SERVEDBY (PRINTNAME)
I I
b3
b6
b7C
TITLE
I I ~de-\ ~ - FBI
STATEMENTOF SERVICEFEES
TRAVEL
- 'SERVICES _ 'TOTAi,- b6
b7C
OF SERVER<2,
DECLARATION
Executedon foh-ot'l,Doj
1
DATE
I SJGt(ATUREOFSERVER 1"..,,,.,
1/4:_o~-:PIV
u V
ADDITIONALINFO~MATION
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X Deleted Page(s) X
X No Duplication Fee X
X For this Page X
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
UNCLASSIFIED -
FD-71
., Revised FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
7-21-2009 COMPLAINT FORM
ADMINISTRATION
ClassificationLevel:
u r FISA Derived
On 11/03/2009 another scientology website, Freedom-Belgium.org, logged attempts to access the C99shell
program. The Freedom-Belgium.org website is hosted on the same computer as scientology-europe.org
Webserver logs show that several of the IP address who accessed the C99Shell program are located in the United
States
Occurrence(s): Time:
From: To: Duration: Duration Units:
COMPLAINANT
Name: r ProtectSource !Date
.
of Complaint: tme of Complaint: b6
b7C
Address: lfelephone:
~~
Gender: lr-....,nb1n~ 0 ___ ,., _ _, D,
I
~
SUBJECT ~ J
Last Name or OrganizationName:
WHYARETHEYDEAD.ORG
First Name: MiddleInitial: TeA
%Iephone Number
. . ~f\ l
SocialSecurity Number: Date of Birth:
.
Placeof Birth: /
' P< I
,~1+
- ZS 4 -s&9
2~6"',A---1..-A-
This document should not be disseminat ...
......, :1_
\ j
Gender:
. u,.
Hair Color:
. Build:
Eye Color:
UNCLASSIFIED
'.
Complexion:
Heiaht :
Feet: Inches:
Address:
Other Names:
Other Addresses:
Scar(s)/Tattoo(s):
Scar/Tattoo Description :
J\ssociate(s):
Weapon(s):
Weapon Description:
Vehicle(s):
INVESTIGATIVE METHODS
FINDINGS
Recommended Classification: Recommended Alpha:
r Disseminate to FIG
r Disseminate to others
Recommended Action:
Date :
Assessment Findings:
b6
Federal Violation:
b7C
SUPERVISOR REVIEW
DAcnon!=:ihleSunervisor:
I . ,._
kLA) (FBI)
Author :
('
(.'
Preliminary Investigation
Full Investigation
FI'Start Date:
11/3/2009
UNCLASSIFIED
Issue: Country: b6
b7C
Division: Classification: Alpha: ICPI Code: I Case ID:
LA
Serial Number:
288 iA I\NONE
I
n------~1-..1 .... -
IIKl:11.11:vll::S
t~A) (FBI)
ATTACHMENTS
FEDERAL
BUREAU
UNCLASSIFIED
OF INVESTIGATION
Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 11/04/2009
Approved By: I/
UNCLASSIFIED
To:
Re:
Los Angeles
288A-LA-254389
From:
UNCLASSIFIED
Los Angeles
, 11/04/2009
b6
b7C
UNCLASSIFIED
2
To:
Re:
Los Angeles
288A-LA-254389
From:
UNCLASSIFIED
Los Angeles
, 11/04/2009
LEAD (s) :
CYBER
AT WASHINGTON, DC
UNCLASSIFIED
3
(Rev. 05-01-2008)
FEDERAL
BUREAU
UNCLASSIFIED
OF INVESTIGATION
Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 11/06/2009
UNCLASSIFIED
FD-302(Rev. 10-6-95)
- 1-
ALL IMF0RHATI0M C0MTAINED
HEREIM IS UMCLASSIFIED
DATE 06-13-2011 BY 60322 UCLP/PLJ/JM
v. Whois is on 888chan.org b6
b7C
======~~~~ru-m
by~=: .....
~-----------,1<--l~f'--------------
'
This documentcontains neitherrecommendationsnor conclusionsof the FBI. It is the propertyof the FBI and is loaned to your agency;
it and its contents are not to be distributedoutside your agency.
288A-LA~389
JPM : j pm-"Jt .
~:s
1
ALL IUFOPHATIOMCOIITAINED
HEREIMI S IDJCLAS SI FIED
DATE 06- 13- 2011 BY 60322 UCLP/P LJ/JM
t'
FD-919 (Rev. 06-05-2003)
FEDERAL
- BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
-
Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 12/11/2009
Approved By:
Drafted By:
VWrkAddr: b6
b7C
VWrkadd2:
VWrkCity:
VWrkSt
VWrkCtry:
VWrkZip
WEmail
WPhone
WFax
VicPager:
NOKFirN :,..____________ ~
NOKMidN:
NOKLastN:
NOKRel
NOKAddr:
NOKAddr2:
NOKCity :
NOKState:
NOKCtry :
NOKZip
NOKHEmal:
NOKWEmal:
NOKHPho
NOKWPho
NOKHFax
NOKWFax
NOKPager:
GrdFirN:
GrdMidN:
GrdLastN:
GrdRel
GrdAddr :
GrdAddr2:
GrdCity:
GrdState:
GrdCtry:
GrdZip
GrdHEmal:
GrdWEmal:
GrdHPho
GrdWPho
GrdHFax
GrdWFax
GrdPager:
PropRet N
TotLoss 001000000
Lang. EN
Disable
2
I
To:
Re:
Los Angeles
-
288A-LA-254389
From: Los Angeles
, 12/11/2009
3
r
(Rev. 05-01-2008)
FEDERAL
BUREAU
UNCLASSIFIED
OF INVESTIGATION
Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 12/14/2009
To: San Antonio Attn: SSA ._I ________ _,J
Approved By:
Drafted
Case ID (Pending)
ALL IN F0Pl-lATI0 N cm rrAHIED
HEREIN IS U!i.TCLASSIFIED
Title: UNSUB(S) DATE 06 - 13-2 011 BY 6 0 3 2 2 UCLP/PL,J /,JN
Church of Scientology - VICTIM
Computer Intrusion
00:LA
UNCLASSIFIED
,
I
To:
Re:
San Antonio
288A-LA-254389,
From:
UNCLASSIFIED
Los Angeles
12/14/2009
b6
b7C
surveillance
Write~
atr
r:anest:t:;t a San Antonio
lusing
Agent conduct
a wireless capable device
and make note o t e availa e wireless networks in and around the
residence. Please note the name of the network as it appears on
the device and whether or not the network is secured or available
to the public. Also, please provide a description of the
residence and if possible pictures in anticipation of a search
warrant.
UNCLASSIFIED
2
r
'
I ' ~ ")..
~
UNCLASSIFIED
LEAD (s)':
J
Writer requests that a San Antonio Agent conduct
surveillance at! I using a wireless capable device
and make note of the available wireless networks in and around the
residence. Please note the name of the network as it appears on
the device and whether or not the network is secured or available
to the public. Also, please provide a description of the
residence and if possible pictures in anticipation of a search
warrant.
++
UNCLASSIFIED
3
288A-~f254389 -
i
JPM: j prti1
f\
ALL IUFOPHATIOMCOIITAINED
HEREIMI S IDJCLAS SI FIED
DATE 06- 13- 2011 BY 60322 UCLP/P LJ/JM
FD-302(Rev. 10-6-95)
- 1-
ALL IUF0PHATIOM COIITA INED
HEREIM I S IDJCLASSIFIE D
DATE 06 - 13 - 20 11 BY 60322 UCLP/PL J /JM
the IP a6atessl
! l:tate: thatattrr
further
~ccessed
review of the server
the following
logs,
pages on the
website Sciento ogy- urope.org (Date/Time stamps may vary depending
on which entry of the log used, as multiple entries are made for
each visit to a webpage):
Defaced Page: 3 times (November 1, 2009 19:36:19, 19:36:33 and
19:36:38 b6
b7C
Shell.php: 2 times (November 2, 2009 09:45:09 and
November 2, 2009 09:45:39)
SQL.php 1 time (November 2, 2009 09:47:06)
b6
b7C
This document contains neither recommendationsnor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency;
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.
FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95)
- 1-
b6
b7C
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
by ~----f-1"1
___________ _
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency;
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.
,. ~; , , l
FD-340a (Rev. 11-12-89)
0 0
...'
-4. "'.',},.
~-.
ALL rnF0 PHATIOM cm ITAINED
HEREIM I S IDJCLASS IF IED
DATE 06 - 13 - 2011 BY 60322 UCLP/ PLJ/ JM
I_Als
(Title) _____________ _ ' '
l-:-
-i_-rt;ss;ciaaii~~~oit~~~-~~~ii~iN~~i.~io~$o~I ..- ;~,.'~"' b6
__li___________ i3~~~~-~Q~~ ___ .. _ :.: __ . ____ -.----b7C
]:1\NQ~9VJ,wg~-~~'!'!!I :
- - ,
, ,.. ,j
~~~~Tqs-~OM
' sqkVEILLANCE AT ....
.
I
/#fo
I
-1 fu,-
Ml:h /U ~~ I
IA-1
I
I
~ 11FlA< {,+(MM,11~ 7-1 I b6
b7C
- --~- -~-:.......:;,...:~
~---..,~
I I ' ,- j
-1
I
I
I
I I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- ---- ---~- .e
,-----..,...--
C'
FD,340 (Rey.+l 1-03)
\:,.,
._,.. ,I ' b6
Serial # ofOriginatingDocument b7C
Date Received
,,
.,
Fro
----------m~ofContributor/Interviewee)
(Address)
~-
To Be Returned D Yes D No
I
/
r'
ReceiptGiven Yes No .D D
GrandJuryMaterial-Disseminate OnlyPursuantto Rule6 (e)
FederalRulesof CriminalProcedure
0 Yes 0. No'
FederalTaxpayerlnfonnation(FTI) ..
0 Yes D No
b6
Reference: ---------- .......
------------------ b 7C
(CommCnibaqon
EncbsingMaterial)
..._____________________ -1 on~
_____. I m & .. s. h..s:-1,-
1..,.~
\
~- \
~
~ ..
_,....,,_..;.. :- _ --
, .,;,
- - . . 7 '\ . . ..
- Random [Anonymoused] http://anonymouse.org/cgi -bin/anon-www.cgi/http://netchanorg/b/res/588 .html
b6
[ l2/ h / x / jQ / ~ / ss / radio / mJn / flirl J b7C
D[Home) [Manage)
/bl - Random
-c:: -c::
0 0
C: C:
:ti :ti
5 g
:i: :i:
!Il
m m
9l
[Bml.m)
Posting mode: Reply ALL IMF0RMATIOM COJITAIMED
HEPEHJ IS IDJCLASSIFIED
Name
DATE 06 - 13-2011 BY 60322 UCLP/PLJ/JH
Message
File
r3x
r3x!Gq8xTPRAXU
r3x! !NcXaWSO/
http://oahuraid.ninq.com/
http://forums.whyweprotest.net/members/r3x-169D6/
http://www.oahuraid.com/ - dead
r3x
Tranisent Ox
tOxen
tektonic04
b6
:========::::::;------'
Mifune b7C
Previous Cities:
Augusta, Kansas
Wichita, Kansas
b6
b7C
Relatives;
Home:
www.myspace.com/tektonic04
http ://209.85.173.132/search?g=cache: lPDujfJ yLgJ :profile.myspace.com
/ind ex.cfm%3Ffuseactjon%3Duser. vj ewprofi Ie%26friendI D%3D 51483116+ Transient+Ox&h I=
en&ct=clnk&cd=l&gl=us
http ://www.myspace.com/transientox
http://209.85.173.132/search?g-cache;cCGfZGRaLxgJ:www.myspace.com/transientox+Transient+Ox&hl-en&ct-clnk&cd-S&gl-us
http: //transieotox.wordpress.com/
http: //209.85.173 .132/search?g =cache: rOOrjCEDnIEJ:transientox. wordpress.com/2008/01 /19/who-is-transient-ox/ + Transient+Ox&hl =en&ct=cln k&
cd-3&gl-us
http: //www. run uo. com/forums/starbu cks- run uo-com/7 2091-do-you-have-myspace. htm I# post55 3217
http://www.runuo.com/forums/members/mifune.html
ICQ: 171983547
AIM: mifune04
YIM: mifune04
Website: http; //www.shardwjre.org/
http://priyate.dnsstuff.com/too!s/whois.ch?ip-http://www.shardwire.org/&email-on
3RD -Third
RAD - Radio
BN - Battalion
H&s - Headquarters and Service
CO- Company
EM - Enlisted Military
PLT - Platoon
[Mod]
Delete Post [ File Only]
[ "QIh / X / jQ I ':!:1fJI ss / radio / m3n / f!irl ] Password :,;q~iit~:t
;/Report:..
- Serissa 1.0.5 + Took 0.02s -
..
f,
c
' '
C.
,
FD,340 (Rev,4-11-03) _....(,AL- t
Serial# of OriginatingDocument
....
\.. ,1
. ~-.~
Date Received \, (1 "Joto
Fro b6
___ ..___________ ...laJllle
ofContributor/Inteiviewee) ,. b7C
(Address)
f.;
'--""""'.:"
____________ ...J (Cityand State)
,.
C "I.4- l_ _________
_;) .J~1
_ ______ HEREIIUFOPHA
ALL TJCLASSIFIED
M I S ID IOM COI
ITAINED i .
By
DATE 06- 13- 2011 BY 60322 UCLP/PLJ/JM ~i
Reference:
(Comnl;I\idationEnc~singMaterial)
-;,--------------------------lr-~1-+-r-a/_j)
.7
\
b6
b7C
:1::
::
act=img&img=ext_error_log
europe. org/admin/shell.php"
1
::rko/2009102815
- [02/Nov/2009:
.._"""".-=-..,....,...,.,.,.,,,""=",..,......,a.
t-lng It -a w ltr
HTTP/1. l" 200 1467 "http://www.
"Mozilla/5.
Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty)
scientology-
o (Xll; U; Linux i686; en-US;
Firefox/3.0.15"
09 :45: 10 -0700] "GET /admin/shell
HTTP/1.1" 200 520 "http://www.scientology-
.php?
europe.org/admin/shell.php" "Mozilla/5. 0 (Xll; U; Linux i686; en-US;
rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009102815 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Firefox/3.0.15"
I-::J::-::' -
t-1 g i -e
:rcko/2009102815 Ubuntu/9.04
[02/Nov/2009:09:45:.44
(jaunty) Firefox/3.0.15"
-0700] "GET /admin/shell.php?
txt HTTP/1.1" 200 564 http://www.scientology-
11
europe;org/admin/shell.php?act=f&f=shell.php&d=%2Fhome4%2Fsciento2%
2Fpublic html%2Fadmin&" "Mozilla/5. o (Xll~ U; Linux i686; en-US;
rv:1.9.0-:-15) Gecko/2009102815 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Firefox/3.0.15"
.__a_c..,.t-=
!-- [02/Nov/2009:09:45:44
...i-m-g"""'&""i_m_g_=_e_x..,..t
-0700] "GET /admin/shell.php?
.exe HTTP/1.1" 200. 550 "http://www.scientology-
europe.org/admin/shell.php?act=f&f=shell.php&d=%2Fhome4%2Fsciento2%
2Fpublic html%2Fadmin&" "Mozilla/5.0 (Xll; U; Linux i686; en-US;
1::::- - J : :-::}
:: t-l49 l t -e
:(cko/20091028E .Ubuntu/9.04
[02/Nov/2009:Q9:45:44
(jaunty) Firefox/3.0.15"
-0700] "GET (admin/shell.php?
html HTTP/1.1" 200 662 11http://www.scientology-
europe.org/admin/shell.php?act=f&f=shell.php&d=%2Fhome4%2Fsciento2%
2Fpublic html%2Fadmin&" "Mozilla/5.0 (Xll; U; Linux i686; en-US;
1::::t - J : :-::}
:: c-:r.,19 1 t -e
::fko/2009102815 Ubuntu/9.04
[02/Nov/2009:09:45:44
(jaunty) Firefox/3.0.15"
-0700] "GET_!admin/shell.php?
rtf HTTP/1.1" 200 596 11http://www.sc1entology-
europe.org/admin/shell.php?act=f&f=shell.php&d=%2Fhome4%2Fsciento2%
2Fpublic html%2Fadmin&" "Mozilla/5.0 (Xll; U; Linux i686; en-US;
rv:1.9.0-:-15) Gecko/2009102815 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Firefox/3.0.15"
.
\\
FD-340 (Rev.4-11-03)
Serial# of OrfgloatfngDocument JO \:
Date Received O 2 / 2 S / 2- ~ Io
From S.e / {=-
(Nameof Contributor/Interviewee)
ALL IMFOPHATIOM
COMTAINED
---------------------- HEREIM IS UUCLASSIFIED
(Address) DATE 06-13-20 11 BY 60322 UCLP/PLJ/JH
(Cityand State)
By ~.-----------.li---------- b6
__ , I
~-
..~.
b7C
:ToBeRetumed O Yes ~o l
...
Receipt Given O yes ~o
Grand Jury Material- DisseminateOnlyPursuantto Rule 6 (e)
FederalRules of CriminalProcedure.-./
0 Yes ~ No
FederalTaxpayerInformation(FTI) ~
0 Yes )A' No
Title:
A)Oil
DOCLABNOTE
ITEM(S)
CANNOT
.
BESCANNED I
~-"--.
.,.,
,, ...
1.,t
1..;,.;, . -'\'
i
b6
.,
,I b7C
I .:~~
I '
(
'~:,
. ALL IUFOPHA . .. f -
HEREIM I "' TIOM COIITAINED
' ,
I
f' '
,:
~,..,;
' ....
r' ,( i
;.
1
I
}.
\
---------------------------------------
; ,.,
' '~.
- ....,....... . ' .,.. ' .. ' --- . .., .. ',-:,
'
i (
0 0
i I
FD-340(Rev.,1.11-03)
Serlal1#of OriginatingDocume'1t /0 \
..
,
I
Date Received O i. .I 2 S / 2 o J~
(Nameof Contributor/Interviewee)
(Addrcu)
ALL rnFOPHATIOM cm ITAINED
~
tatrnd 11-:~_>
_____ D
_A_TE
_ 0_6_-_u _--_2_0_ll _ B_Y_ 60322 7ucLP /PLJ / JN
,t:
To Be Returned Yes D .12t"'No b6
'
FederalRulesof CriminalProcedure
o Yes g/No
FederalTaxpayerInfonnation(FTI)
O Yes ~No
Title:
'"'--.
-I- /3/02,
02../-i.s / ;;_~, t>
--
~
___-
_______
~.;-.,,
....,.,.---,,
.... .,;;,
,
,
,,
.
'
-~-\
-
~
,_
-- --~ - ~,-
- l( ~---~--~-
._.._______
-----
-- ---~--- I
K - ~ a
--. --~~-/_.
-~~--- -- -------
ri.', . :
y
: .
;.1
..,
~
I '
0 0 ,1'
., 1'irr rr
From
(Nameof Contributor/Interviewee)
(Addrlu)
~ .. ..::.; .
~~-~--------------
-------.,...-'"""(--=- ....
:. (CityandSlate)
b6-
b 7c
By ~---___.Ji--- O
---h , .
., I FederalTaxpayerInfonnation~-
Title:
0 Yes
.
.P-/40
Reference~--11Go::::-;...(._,;;;;-
_____ .....;_
(1
________________ _
(Communication
EnchsingMaterial)
e x..i:.,J {: f e
-_,.,
-:..- - \
From:
Sent: b6
To: b7C
Subject:
ud INov12010 OLD~ I
NOV/2009 EWT 4800 GWT 5800 TONS 112
TRUCKPLT, STKRREGCLASS35 $ 64.32 BEXARCNTY
TITLE! ::::: :~21/2005 ODOMETER
335REGDT11/24/2009
2005,CHEq,.._~.,..,..,.,,......,.....,.......,.....,..,
.......--RK<=l, SALESPRICE$ 21232.00
PREVOWN RODOLPHCHE L L PASO,TX ,
I ::;:31/2004,GMAc,,P.o. BOXs104,,COcKEVk1LLE,MD,21030
PLATEAGE: 5 LASTACTIVITY 12/05/2009 RENEWOFC: 015
REMARKSRELEASEOF PERSONALINFO RESTRICTED.ACTUAL mLE.
MILEAGE.PAPER
MRI: 93372450 IN: MVD 95300 AT 04MAR201013:20:58
OUT: FBSZ24 AT 04MAR201013:20:59
I I
Technical Information Specialist
EBI Sao Aotaoio Division
1
DATE: 03-04-2010 10:42:15 AM LJe: Recv
SUBJECT: RR FROMNLET - RQ,
Message:
Reference: 02V700001B b6
Msg ID : 02V700001B b7C
Msg Key : RR
Date/Time: 20100304095924
Ent Agy :
Requester:
User :
ORI NMNSP0000
Source NLET
Dest TXFBISA00
Dest FBSz ..___ ----.
Control
Summary I_____,
RQ: ...
TXT: RR.NMNSP0000
08:59 03/04/2010 56492
08:59 03/04/2010 57050 TXFBISA00
TXT
ZZ .. RR.NMLIC0000.NMNSP0000.*----------,
TXT
NEW...-Jlo:L~~J......a/EHICLE
REGISTRATION INQUIRY
** NO MORERECORDS
MRI: 92988132 IN: NLil 25265 AT 04MAR2010 09:59:23
OUT: FBSZ 16 AT 04MAR2010 09:59:24
DISSEMINATEDON TLETS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE PURPOSES ONLY.
======------========================================-=======
ALL IUFOPHATIOMCOIITAINED
HEREIM I S IDJCLASSI FIE D
DATE 06- 13- 2011 BY 60322 UCLP/P LJ/JM
Page 1
.., ---- ----- --- ~---' .. - - - ..- --- ,,,___ ,.1__,...._....,__
_____ ...._....__
__ _
: ,.
....
r'
,:
0 0
FD-340(Rev.4-11-03)
To Be Returned D Yes No
ReceiptGiven YesD No
I
I
/
GrandJury Material- DisseminateOnly Pursu nt to Rule 6 (e)
FederalRulesof CriminalProcedure
YesD No ALL nJFOPHATIONCONTA
INED
FederalTaxpayerInformation(FTI) HEREIN IS UJ,JCLASSIFIED
\ '~ . DATE 06-13-2011 BY 60322 UCLP/PLJ/JM
D Yes No
Title: t" _
~,(),,1otr~
.
Reference:
(Communication
Enclosing
Material)
I
~
~~
------. -
_,,~
~.
_..
I
ALL IUF0PHATIOM COIITAINED
HEREIM I S IDJCLASSIFIE D
.---------- DATE 06 - 13 - 20 11 ~....
Y_6-03-22_ l_TC-LP-/ f-'LJ_/ _
JN-- \
/ . vt 5
~1 I b6
b7C
k~
s'1e/c~h-s ;J
~ /.!Gt~,,.(
YJ,ore Co-fvk'.s
-( G-9
(,~-ri- ~y r<.-.,.>J1u.'-.
Y~ r-.. f-e~r1,t_ (r,e-k ;
-----
f:'r,e.J,.{
f.<v
r\ 5 1,~v x '11f)re_ SR c, ..- r I' f=-r
,-t'..) ..s t ,.; f 11
""''
I c. o; 1
1,
v1ot- tc..,,o'"-,{-tJ
< ~rote vi (rc,,,s
b6
~ b7C
..
,, vV, ( e\e.S.J '-"-"'J. ~(--f'/1. Vvt)v {).
I Ove
~e '-"-<~ \-t"'5>~ .. ~ka{ f/J-e&r1f v~":)
IV,o 0J):c~0,..! fio v..s )z:;~ -/ li:.s' /".'J.-5,
....i '"",,s,'
_____ __._.l,
..,
I, t
0 0
,t{\ 1
;\'f',,
FD-340(Rev. 4,11-03)
Fron
(Address)
KW~r~-~-tj
_____________ _ l
b6
b7C
~:;
ToBeRetumed D Yes No I -.
-,
~~
ReceiptGiven DYes No I
J.
GrandJury Material- DisseminateOnlyPursu nt to Rule 6 (e) {.
FederalRulesof CriminalProcedure
D Yes No ALL INF0Pl-lA TI 0N cmrrA HIE D
FederalTaxp11yerInfonnation(FTI) HEREIN IS U!i.TCLASSIFIE D
'. . DATE 06 - 1 3 - 2011 BY 60322 UCLP/PL,J /,JN
, D Yes No
.. '
Title:
Reference:
, ., ,
(Communication
..... EnclosingMaterial)
-,r.e,-:-~_te
_.nl.Wii:DLDtlLLD.;:.,__J~~_Jn~wnaJu:1.C, interviewof
-~-
,__,__
""'*
-1 ~ .,.._
\
b6
b7C
b6
b7C
Date of transcription 03/04/2010
-~-......-11
......
t
A keypad
driveway
Every several
by brick
as
columns.
was
feet
The house sits approximately 100 yards from the road. Paved
parking areas were observed in the front of the house, on the west
side of the house (which is the area in front of the garage), and
on the east side of the garage (which is the area behind the
house). On the back of the house, eastern side, a deck area
enclosed in wood lattice was observed.
0
wac Chevrolet van, bearing exas icense plate
S took nine digital photographs of the
ce/proper y during this surveillance.
This document .contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency;
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.
..
~ ,.,
FD-302a(Rev. 10-6-95)
,
288A-LA-254389
Approved
I con~ucted
! on 02/25at ___ _
1,.._______
........... _,
UNCLASSIFIED
To:
Re:
Los Angeles
288A-LA-254389,
From:
-
San Antonio
03/04/2010
UNCLASSIFIED
~~;~!~~{an~:ra~:fereDC::,CO:IDJJDi:at:OD
San::to:ir.~~ndu~ted
02/25/2010. Writer uti ize a wire ess capa e evice which
detected three secure wireless networks in the vicinity of this
address. The house is located approximately 100 yards from the
road and was enclosed by wood, wire, and wrought-iron fencing. A
wrought-iron gate at the entrance of the driveway was closed
denying access to the property. It is possible that a wireless
device/network went undetected from the residence because of the
distance the writer was from the house. b6
b7C
Writer took Nine digital photographs of the
residence/property. There were two vehicles located on the
property. One vehicle a white 2004 Chevrolr-a- ....... z.......
...-~
Utility Vehic~l..i:.:......i.:.-
...........:::1......,1..ii......1:.1.............. ~"'-- ...... .-.i..........,.-.....i.......,.i...:,,i._
___ &.....II......,
registered t
other vehicleL....:1,~ra~s=-=a---=-=-:~=--"l'l""l"'......,."l'!::"":e~v~r~o-=--r-~e~t:--::~q~~~~-:..~~~~~::-i-~~
._J_i_c_e_u_s_e_n_i_a_t_e_l
________ ,_-s_registered
1
Writer also accessed and printed two satellite images
of this property from the Internet (Bing).
San Antonio considers lead covered.
UNCLASSIFIED
2
To:
Re:
Los Angeles
288A-LA-254389,
-From:
UNCLASSIFIED
San Antonio
03/04/2010
e
LEAD(s):
LOS ANGELES
UNCLASSIFIED
3
('
(Rev. 05-01-2008)
- UNCLASSIFIED
- c!fl
Approved By:
Drafted By:
I
l.....,.
_______
L"~=---------
l_j_..p~rA
Case ID#: 288A-LA-254389 (Pending)
~oto
Computer Intrusion DATE 06 - 1 3 - 2011 BY 60322 UCLP/PL J/ JM
00:LA
Administrative: Writer
July 7, 2010 re~ard~Ag
spoke with
thi,l~atter:
ssJ
=ag~eedSSAI
:vif
telephone on
D;rvide t: b6
b7C
n agP-nt to aRsist s with said int rvi w. s_ _ __
: y writer
= and SA I
to San An onio.
covered previous lead Seria 7 sent
UNCLASSIFIED
I '
To:
Re:
San Antonio
288A-LA-254389,
- From:
UNCLASSIFIED
Los Angeles
07/07/2009
-
b6
Scientology-Europe.org and Scientology-Europe.org without b7C
entering
address
l,aai
.defacemLnt.;esults
::~:er
a username and password.
by the
accessed
Church of Scientology
files associated
from AT&T show this
show IP
with the
IP address is
registered to I Biographical information is as follows:
UNCLASSIFIED
2
-i:
To:
Re:
San Antonio
288A-LA-254389,
- From:
UNCLASSIFIED
Los Angeles
07/07/2009
-
LEAD(s) :
At SAN ANTONIO, TX
UNCLASSIFIED
3
{ '
FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95)
- 1-
ALL IUF0PHATIOM COIITAINED
HEREIM I S IDJCLASSI FIE D
DATE 06 - 1 3 - 20 11 BY 60 3 22 UCLP / PLJ/JM
agents
II
th~ctober
was then provided information
of 2009 an IP address
by the interviewing
associated with his
b7C
a residence
addition,
at his re
stated
accessed
ology-Europe.org.
the access
re1c:::, rnet
filesoere
tated
since
cou
connection
there
October
related
had no knowledge
ave occurred
to a hack on the website
while
as it is not always
of this
inro~;
b7C
FHo~A-T.A-254389-j"/ ~ Date dictated 10/ 2 0/ 2 010
s
by SA '
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency;
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.
{ ..
FD-302a (Rev. 10-6-95)
288A-LA-254389
C,mtin"'tionofFD-302 of ~
.. __________ :---------- , On 10 / 13/2010_ , Page ---=2=----
Notes: y resi es at
b6
Name: b7C
Phone:
Relation:
Notes: previously
Currrr~e~nrE:QyV-TI;:iu:i:si:::I:C::::::::c:!isffilt::L.5l.itl..u..a.ni.a--but
lived at and visit
Name:
Phone:
Relation:
Notes: y ives at
Name,
Phone:._ ______
Relation:
I
Family
I
__,..___,
friend
Notes: Currently lives and goes to school in Austin TX.
Name: I I1
Phone:
Relation:
Notes:
Family
No longer
friena
lives at_
I
~~~~~L, ,amHy
Notes:
.:~ :~ :~ :~ :~ :~ :~ :~ :~ ~l~rI.....
rne,~I---
No longer lives~
NU
~~~~~~
I l1
Relation: Family Frie~
Notes: No longer lives at_l________ _
Name: I
Phone:......,o=n~k=n-o~w-n
___ ...,
Relation: Family Friend I
Notes:
Name: I
No longer lives
I ..__
_____ _____.
at_
Phone: Unknown
. '
,,
FD-302a (Rev, 10-6-95)
b6
b7C
288A-LA-254389
Relation:
Notes:
~e
Family Friend
No longer lives
items from the
at I
hou._s_e_1_n_c_l.,...u___,d
....
I
Stole
1_n_g_J"'"e-w""'elry
and guns.
San
Antonio Texas, te ep one nu er was interviewed at
his residence. of ......
After being advi....,,..,........,..,_...,,.,.,,.......,,..,~e-~ityt~h-e-----.
interviewing agents, and the purpose of .interview!
provided the following information: ______
._ _
b6
current1y lives at! riea~~es the b7C
internet conlection at this location to visit Facebook, Myspace,
and YouTube. _ !stated he jr
not a very knowledgeable computer
user, and that he uses Windows. lwas not familiar with the
internet ANONYMOUS,or the website 888chan.org.
had no knowledge of and attack on the website
sc org and had not heard any of the other residents
at.__......,._...,...
questioning
_____ _.discuss
FBI.
the attack ....
.
l___
___.lwasopen to further
.
ALL IloJFORHA.TIOMCO?ITAIMED
HEREIN IS IDJCLASSIFIED
DATE 06- 13- 2011 BY 60322 UCLP/PLJ/JM
Drafted By:
UNCLASSIFIED
a,UVAL
/(-- 5' - /tJ
tr'
;)..t,iA-rviLl
I - 25t./!>~1-ll.tP
(' (05et( __
;)ifl- LA- -JSltJiC?f,
~ ,..ot<
To:
Re:
Los Angeles
288A-LA-254389
From:
UNCLASSIFIED
Los Angeles
, 11/02/2010
such as TOR to mask their identity. No further investigation was
conducted on these IP addresses.
I t: :I
writer interviewed nd learned that in addition to
I
nve'?-"
the
three
his
individuals
child~en
residence
were college
and
during
friends
,
the
of
t least
timer th:attacr.
eight other
an~
individuals
Q. not provide
stated
me so that
connection.
their
he often left
full contact
his wireless
anyone could access
in
the
orma ion.
router
internet
urth
open for periods
through his
r
UNCLASSIFIED