You are on page 1of 3

OBP005061

From: (b) (6)


To: (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6)

Subject: RE: PF225 Phase I Project Issues for J1/J3 & I1A
Date: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 8:15:30 AM

ALCON;
I have the contractor working up a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) for the additional section that is
required along J1 at the POE. Should have this information shortly to advise Loren Flossman
accordingly.
Thanks,
(b
)

(b) (6)
Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers-Albuquerque District
4101 Jefferson Plaza NE
Albuquerque, NM, 87109
(b) (6)
(b) (6)

From: (b) (6)


Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:33 PM
To: (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6)

Subject: Re: PF225 Phase I Project Issues for J1/J3 & I1A

Thanks (b) (6) Please advise if you do not get the required answers for your questions. OBP is
obviously behind the sector's position on operational placement of the fencing around the POE. The
IBWC issue will more than likely need to be discussed with IBWC, SBI and OBP if SBI TI is not inclined
to place the gates in the fence. There is an open communication with IBWC at the DC level so
hopefully we can get a feel for their wishes at that level also. Thanks again.
(b)
(6)
----- Original Message -----
From: (b) (6)
To: (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6)

Sent: Fri Dec 28 17:04:32 2007


Subject: PF225 Phase I Project Issues for J1/J3 & I1A
OBP005062

Scott,

On December 28, the SBInet Office conducted a teleconference with (b) (6) (USACE) and PAIC
Jonathan Richards (STN). Several issues came up that I wanted to address with you so that we can get
a resolution in a rapid manner. I’m not sure if you are aware, but we are holding the Pre-Construction
Meeting for the projects in Santa Teresa on January 9th. Once this is completed, the fence will be
going in the ground almost immediately. At that point all issues will be considered either out in the
open for resolution or resolved.

About a week ago we received the project plans from Tetra Tech for our review. I was told that a copy
was also sent to ACPA (b) (6) and yourself. During the review of the plans PAIC Jonathan
Richards brought up some valid issues. After speaking with (b) (6) about it this morning, it was
decided collectively that decisions on some of these issues will have to be made at your level. I have
tried to outline the issues below and cc’d all involved for clarification.

(b) (5)
OBP005063

(
b
)
(
5
)

With the project set to begin in less than two weeks, we need guidance on these issues immediately.

To ensure that there are no other issues representatives from USACE and Tetra Tech will be coming out
to the Santa Teresa Border Patrol Station on January 4th for a site visit. During this visit we will tour all
of the project areas to ensure that everyone involved understands exactly what is being built, and
where it is being built. This should also ensure that our understanding accurately reflects Tetra Tech’s
intentions.

Thanks for the assistance.

(b) (6)

Field Operations Supervisor

El Paso Sector SBInet Office

(b) (6)

Office -(b) (6)

You might also like