Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Generating Ideas
2. Opportunity Identification
3. Business Concepts
Business Concept is the creative process involved in generating, developing and communicating a novel concept
that has the potential of exploiting a new or untapped business opportunity in the market. Business Concept is
essential in a world where the only constant is change, and where you need to be innovative and find new
opportunities for growth to take your business to the next level.
For entrepreneurs, it is often easier to come up with a variety of ideas for new businesses and
more difficult to actually implement those concepts. A business concept is a bridge between an
idea and a business plan. It focuses ones thinking so that the entrepreneur can identify the
specifics of his/her proposed venture. Converting an idea into a business concept requires
thinking about how the product or service will be sold and who will buy it, the benefits of the
product or service, how it is differentiated from similar ones, and methods of delivery.
Preparing a written concept statement helps unearth critical components of a venture and begins
research into key factors that may be more thoroughly addressed in a business plan. As the
business idea takes form as a concept statement, the entrepreneur can evaluate the business more
effectively for potential challenges and pitfalls.
WHAT IS CREATIVITY
Creativity is designed as the tendency to generate or recognize ideas, alternatives or possibilities
that may be useful in solving problems, communicating with others and entertaining ourselves
and others.
Tests of creativity measure not only the number of alternatives that people can generate but the
uniqueness of those alternatives. The ability to generate alternatives or to see things uniquely
does not occur by change; it is linked to other more fundamental qualities of thinking, such as
flexibility and tolerance of ambiguity or unpredictability.
PROCESS OF CREATIVITY
1. Opportunity or Problem Recognition
A person discovers that a new opportunity exits or a new problem needs resolution.
2. Immersion
The individual concentrates on the problem and becomes immersed in it. He/she will recall and
collect information that seems relevant, dreaming up alternatives without refining or evaluating
them.
3. Incubation
The person keeps the assembled information in mind for awhile. He or she does not appear to be
working on the problem actively; however, the subconscious mind is still engaged. While the
information is simmering it is being arranged into meaning new patterns.
4. Insight
The problem-conquering solution flashed into the persons mind at an unexpected time, such as
on the verge of sleeps, during a shower or while running.
WHAT IS INNOVATION
Innovation is the implementation of new ideas at an individual, a group or organizational level.
TYPES OF INNOVATION
1. PRODUCT INNOVATION
Perhaps the by and large understood type of innovation is that which introduces or improves the
value of a product or service. The Split AC is an example of a product innovation, which has also
benefited from a range of incremental innovations since its original invention. There may also be
innovative products which help to achieve organizational goals. For example, the Life Straw is a
portable water filter developed by Vestergaard-Frandsen which enables individuals to drink
clean water from almost any source. Product innovation leads to product development
approaches.
2. PROCESS INNOVATION
Innovations also focus on processes through which products are produced or delivered to
customers. By improving the process into innovative process organizations mostly enhance their
efficiency and effectiveness. Examples of process innovations that have had a positive effect on
organizational performance are automated packing, Adoption of CNC etc.
3. POSITION INNOVATION
The third focus of innovation is re-positioning the perception of an existing product/services or
process in a specific context. Position-based innovations refer to changes in how a specific
product or process is perceived representatively and how they are used to achieve the
organizational goals. For example, Levi-Strauss jeans are a well know global product line,
formerly developed as manual workers clothing materials, but then re-branded as a fashion item.
4. PARADIGM INNOVATION
The final P of 4P innovation model relates to innovation that defines or redefines the dominant
paradigms of an organization or entire sector. Paradigm-based innovations relate to the mental
models which shape what an organization or business is about. Henry Ford provides a pithy
quote, when talking about the development of the Model T motor car: If I asked people what
they wanted, they would have asked for a five-legged horse.
2. Modular Innovation
Modular innovation uses the architecture and configuration associated with the existing system
of an established product, but employs new components with different design concepts.
3. Discontinuous Innovation
Discontinuous innovations cause a paradigm shift in science or technology and/or the market
structure of an industry. As they are entirely new-to-the world products, made to perform a
function for which no product has previously existed, discontinuous innovation requires a good
deal of learning for the incumbent organisation and its value network, including the user.
Discontinuous innovations disrupt established routine and may even require a very different set
of capabilities and new behaviour patterns. The notion of novelty is relative so a discontinuous
innovation for one organisation might be an incremental one for another. Radical innovation and
discontinuous innovation are synonyms. Disruptive innovation used to be a synonym until 1997.
Since then the term has been strongly associated with Christensens model. Incremental
innovation is the opposite of radical innovation
4. Architectural Innovation
Innovations that change the way in which the components of a product are linked together, while
leaving the core design concepts (and thus the basic knowledge underlying the components)
untouched. Architectural innovation destroys the usefulness of a firm's architectural knowledge
but preserves the usefulness of its knowledge about the product's components
Sources of Innovation
1. new markets;
2. new technologies;
3. new political rules;
4. running out of roads (limited options);
5. change in sentiments or behaviours;
6. deregulations;
7. Changes in the business models.
A good example of incremental innovation is Googles Gmail, the worlds most popular email
service. When first launched, Gmail had few features, but did one thing very well. It delivered
emails quickly, without lots of confusing ads. As time passed, Google introduced many
additional features and improved its service, making it faster and better. Since then, the company
has successfully emulated this method numerous times with their other products, from Google
Maps to the Chrome internet browser. Google rushes to get a simple product to market in order
to quickly stake out market share in emerging industries, then gradually improves their offering,
making it the best in the field.
But there are still dangers with incremental innovation especially if this is your only method.
Take Kodak, for example. Kodak led the photography industry for years with incremental, yet
steady improvements to traditional film. When the disruptive innovation of digital imaging was
introduced, it revolutionized the way people captured, stored and used images making Kodak
obsolete. Had the company been willing to invest time and effort in more disruptive innovations,
perhaps it would have remained an industry contender.
This brings us to disruptive innovation. It explores new technologies and as such is characterized
by a high level of risk and uncertainty. Ironically, disruptive innovation often depends on
incremental improvements, refinements modifications in complementary technologies. Due to
the high risk factor, smaller companies or start-ups usually play important roles in
disruptive innovation. On the positive side, you sometimes dont need to compete for market
share with disruptive innovation; rather you branch off and create your own market. And the
eventual pay-off can often be spectacular much greater than with incremental innovation. The
Uber example, provided above, is an excellent case of disruptive innovation that played off big.
Since its generally a complex, lengthy process, with big ups and downs, the criteria used to
evaluate a radical idea should not be the same as those applied to incremental innovations.
Whereas incremental innovation will often have a formal, phase-gate development model,
disruptive innovation usually requires an informal, flexible model, especially in the early stages,
due to the many uncertainties. Viewing ideas associated with high uncertainty from the
perspective of mainstream business and traditional trajectories either gives a false sense of
security or leads to prematurely rejecting good ideas. You can switch to a more formal model in
the later stages, after these uncertainties have been minimized.
Find Your Innovation Balance
Whether you choose disruptive or incremental innovation will depend on many factors for
example, the industry you are operating in. The rate of technological change differs greatly
between one industry and another. Some sectors are characterized by rapid change and
disruptive innovations, others by smaller, incremental ones. But generally speaking, there is no
need to put all your eggs in one basket. At the end of the day, its best to find a balance between
the two approaches. Combine the introduction of the occasional revolutionary product with many
small incremental improvements in existing products. By having a comprehensive view of your
initiatives over time, you can avoid either overwhelming or underwhelming the marketplace.
Open source has long since proved its legitimacy, and the use of open source has changed the
way that companies compete. Its very difficult for companies to develop innovative software
without it, and companies now understand the rapid, progressive development it enables. As
industries and technologies continue to evolve at a faster pace, closed source companies will be
dead in the water if they arent leveraging the open source community and the projects theyre
working on.
Nurturing and Managing Innovation
1. Conditions for effective innovation:
Micro/Organisational level
(i) Incentives for innovating;
(ii) Internal policy;
(iii) Organisational culture:
- Inspiration;
- Observation;
- listening to consumer;
- Organisational structure.
Macro/National level
Policy development:
(i) Social (for example, changing demographics);
(ii) Political (for example, internal governance, stability);
(iii) Economic (for example, entrepreneurship policies, incentives);
(iv) Environmental (regulations, environmental responsibility);
(v) Cultural (respect for indigenous customs and practices);
(vi) Ethical (adherence to sound principles and business practices).