Professional Documents
Culture Documents
C onsolidation working papers for the parent-company equity method of accounting were
discussed in Chapter 5. Those illustrations are repeated here for an incomplete equity
method and the cost method of parent-company accounting.
As in the supplement to Chapter 4, this supplement departs from the normal numerical
sequenc- ing to make it easier to compare the alternative working paper formats. The exhibits
labeled Exhibits I5-7 and I5-8 are for incomplete equity method accounting, and Exhibit C5-7 is
for cost method accounting with an initial conversion to equity method accounting. Exhibit T5-8
provides an illustration of the traditional cost method accounting approach, without the initial
conversion to the equity method. These exhibits correspond to equity method Exhibits 5-7 and 5-8
in the chapter.
ES47
Electronic Supplement to Chapter 5 ES1
income amounts for the $2,000 unrealized profit in 2013. The amount of overstatement of
Paks Investment in Say and retained earnings balances would increase by $500 to $2,500 at
December 31, 2014, because the $2,000 unrealized profits deferred in 2013 would not be recog-
nized in Paks 2014 income and the $2,500 unrealized profit at year-end 2014 would not be
excluded from Paks income. The following table summarizes these observations:
Investment balance at
December 31, 2013 $130,500 - $2,000 $128,500
Income from Say in 2014 27,000 + 2,000 26,500
- 2,500 V
Dividends received in 2014 (9000) (9000)
Investment balance at
December 31, 2014 $148,500 - $2,500 $146,000
The errors of omitting the intercompany inventory profits affect the Investment in Say and
retained earnings accounts of Pak by the same amount.
CONVERSION TO EQUITY METHOD APPROACH We convert the working papers for Pak and Say for 2014 to
the equity method with the following working paper entry to correct for the omissions on Paks
books:
After entering this working paper correction, the other working paper entries would be the same as
those illustrated in the consolidation working papers of Exhibit 5-7. Pak could also record this
entry on its separate books before closing in 2014 to correct for all prior errors resulting from the
misapplication of the equity method.
TRADITIONAL WORKING PAPER SOLUTION FOR INCOMPLETE EQUITY METHOD The initial approach to consolidating
Pak and Say financial statements under an incomplete equity method converts the income from
subsidiary, investment in subsidiary, and retained earnings balances to a complete equity basis.
Alternatively, we can adjust the consolidation working paper entries to accommodate an incom-
plete equity method without conversion to the equity basis. Exhibit I5-7 illustrates this alternative
working paper approach.
Only entries b and d differ from those appearing in Exhibit 5-7 under the equity method. We
reproduce these two working paper entries for convenient reference:
Retained Earnings
Retained earningsPak $ 196 b 2 $ 194
Retained earningsSay $ 45 f 45
Balance Sheet
Cash $ 30 $ 5 $ 35
Accounts receivable 70 20 g 10 80
Accounts payable $ 80 $ 15 g 10 $ 85
$1,202.5 $200
$1,241.5
EXH I B I T C5 - 6
Retained
Pak and Subsidiary Earnings Investment Income Dividend
Cost-to-Equit y 12/31/13 in Say from Say Income
Conversion Schedule
Prior Years Effect
90% of Says Increase in undistributed
earnings from July 1, 2011, to December 31,
2013 ($45,000 - $5,000) * 90% $36,000 $36,000
Unrealized profit in Says Inventory
at December 31, 2014 (2,000) (2,000)
Current Years Effect
Reclassify dividend Income as investment
decrease ($10,000 * 90%) (9,000) $(9,000)
Equity in Says Income for 2014
($30,000 * 90%) 27,000 $27,000
Unrealized profit in Says December 31,
2013, inventory 2,000 2,000
Unrealized profit in Says December 31,
2014, inventory (2,500) (2,500)
2014 working paper adjustments to convert
from cost to equity $34,000 $51,500 $26,500 $(9,000)
Beginning parent-company retained earnings are overstated because Pak failed to eliminate the
$2,000 unrealized profits in 2013. The overstatement amount is the difference between the transfer
price and historical cost of the merchandise sold downstream. Entry b decreases Paks beginning
retained earnings and cost of goods sold for realized profits in the beginning inventory. Entry
d eliminates the investment income recognized on Paks books and dividends received from Say.
Entry d also adjusts the investment account to its beginning-of-the-period balance.
Cost Method
If Pak accounts for its investment in Say using the cost method, the investment account and the
December 31, 2014, retained earnings are understated by equal amounts in the parents separate
balance sheet. Also, instead of income from Say, the income statement for 2014 shows dividend
income of $9,000. The Investment in Say account is $94,500the original amount paid by Pak
for its investment.
CONVERSION TO EQUITY METHOD APPROACH The cost-to-equity conversion schedule in Exhibit C5-6 is based
on the same data as under the equity method for Pak and Say, except that Pak maintains its
Investment in Say account using the cost method. The schedule provides information necessary to
adjust the working paper accounts to what they would have been had Pak used the equity method.
We prepare the following consolidation working paper entry from the schedule:
After we enter this working paper adjustment, the other working paper entries are exactly the
same as those in Exhibit 5-7 under the equity method. The parent company may also record this
entry on its books before closing in 2014 to convert the parent-company records to an equity basis.
TRADITIONAL WORKING PAPER SOLUTION FOR COST METHOD When Pak accounts for its investment in Say
by the cost method, the financial statements of Pak and Say are consolidated without converting
to the equity method. Exhibit C5-7 illustrates consolidation working papers when the parent
EXH IB I T C5 - 7
PAK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATION WORKING PAPERS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 (IN THOUSANDS) I n te r c o mpa n y Pr of it s
o n D o wns t r eam
Adjustments
Sa les C os t M e th o d
and Eliminations
wit h In it ia l
90% Consolidated Con v er s io n to Eq ui ty
Pak Say Debits Credits Statements
Income Statement
Net sales $1,000 $300 a 20 $1,280
Dividend Income 9 d 9
Retained Earnings
Retained earningsPak $ 160 b 2 f 36 $ 194
Retained earningsSay $ 45 g 45
Balance Sheet
Cash $ 30 $ 5 $ 35
Accounts receivable 70 20 h 10 80
Accounts Payable $ 80 $ 15 h 10 $ 85
$1,148.5 $200
$1,241.5
company accounts for its investment under the cost method without a working paper entry for
con- version to the equity method.
Working paper entries from Exhibit C5-7 are reproduced for convenient reference:
Entries a, b, and c are the same as those in Exhibit I5-7 under the incomplete equity method.
Under the cost method, the balance of Paks Investment in Say account remains at the $94,500
original cost. Pak recognizes dividend income but does not record its share of Says income or
eliminate intercompany profits.
Entry d eliminates dividend income and 90% of Says dividends. Entry e records noncontrol-
ling interest in Says earnings and dividends. Entry f establishes reciprocity between the
Investment in Say account balance and Says equity balances at the beginning of the period
($145,000 90%). Entries g and h are the same as under the equity method.
Equity
Incomplete - Overstated = Method
Equity Method + Understated (see Exhibit 5-8)
Investment balance at
December 31, 2011 $600 - $32 $568
Income from Sit in 2012 80 + 32 88
- 24 V
Dividends received in 2012 (40) (40)
Investment balance at
December 31, 2012 $640 - $2 $616
CONVERSION TO EQUITY METHOD APPROACH The errors from omitting the intercompany profits in 2011 and
2012 affect the Investment in Sit and retained earnings accounts of Poh by equal amounts.
A working paper entry to correct for the omissions on Pohs books in the 2012 consolidation
working papers of Poh and Subsidiary is as follows:
This working paper entry converts the separate accounts of Poh from the incomplete equity to
the equity method for working paper utilization. After entering the conversion in the working
papers, the other working paper entries are the same as those illustrated in the consolidation work-
ing papers of Exhibit 5-8. The conversion entry could also be recorded in Pohs separate records
before closing in 2012 to correct for the 2011 and 2012 errors of omission.
TRADITIONAL WORKING PAPER SOLUTION FOR INCOMPLETE EQUITY METHOD Exhibit I5-8 illustrates the traditional
approach to consolidating the financial statements of Poh and Sit under an incomplete equity
method. Beginning parent-company retained earnings is overstated by Pohs share of the unreal-
ized profits in Pohs December 31, 2011, inventory of goods acquired from Sit. Entry b
eliminates the $40,000 cost-of-goods-sold effect of the intercompany profits in Pohs beginning
inventory and allocates it 80% to Pohs beginning-of-the-period retained earnings and 20%
EXH I B I T I5 - 8
POCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATION WORKING PAPERS
In te r c o mpa n y Pr of it s FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 (IN THOUSANDS)
o n U ps t r eam Sa le s
Adjustments
In c om pl et e E qu ity
and Eliminations
M e th o d
80% Consolidated
Poh Sit Debits Credits Statements
Income Statement
Sales $3,000 $1,500 a 300 $4,200
Retained Earnings
Retained earningsPoh $1,032 b 32 $1,000
Balance Sheet
Cash $ 200 $ 50 $ 250
$5,024 $1,000
$5,304
Cost Method
If Poh Corporation uses the cost method of accounting for its investment in Sit for 2011 and
2012, its Investment in Sit account remains at $480,000, the original cost of the investment.
Assume the same facts for Poh and Sit as shown in Exhibit 5-8 under the equity method,
except that Poh accounts for the investment in Sit by the cost method.
CONVERSION TO EQUITY METHOD APPROCH Exhibit C5-9 provides data for the working paper entry to
convert Pohs cost-based accounting records to the equity basis. We use the information in the
cost-to-equity conversion schedule to construct a consolidation working paper entry for Poh and
Sit as follows:
This entry is the first working paper adjustment, after which other working paper entries are the
same as those prepared when using the equity method. The cost-to-equity conversion entry may be
recorded on the parent company books before closing in 2012 to convert the parent-company
records to an equity basis.
TRADITIONAL WORKING PAPER SOLUTION FOR THE COST METHOD Exhibit T5-8 illustrates working paper proce-
dures to consolidate the financial statements of Poh and Sit without converting to the equity
method. Entries a, b, and c under the cost method are identical to those under an incomplete equity
method. Entry d eliminates dividend income and 80% of Sits dividends. Entry e records the
noncontrolling interest in Sits earnings and dividends. Entry f takes up Pohs share of Sits
EXH I BI T T5- 8 POH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATION WORKING PAPERS
I n terco mp an y Pro f it s FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 (IN THOUSANDS)
o n U ps t re am Sa les
Adjustments
Tra d iti on a l C os t
and Eliminations
M e th o d
80% Consolidated
Poh Sit Debits Credits Statements
Income Statement
Sales $3,000 $1,500 a 300 $4,200
Retained Earnings
Retained earningsPoh $ 912 b 32 f 120 $1,000
Balance Sheet
Cash $ 200 $ 50 $ 250
$4,864 $1,000
$5,304
Entry g eliminates reciprocal investment and equity balances and enters beginning noncontrol-
ling interest the same as under the equity method. Entry b eliminates reciprocal accounts
receivable and payable.
ASSIGNMENT MA TERIAL
W 5-1
Upstream Sales
Sud Corporation is a 90%-owned subsidiary of Par Corporation, acquired by Par at book value, which was also equal to
its fair value on January 1, 2011. Par uses the equity method of accounting for its investment in Sud but does not adjust
for intercompany profit transactions (an incomplete equity method). Separate income statements for Par and Sud for
2011 and 2012 are as follows (in thousands):
Par Sud
Intercompany sales from Sud to Par were $80,000 during 2011 and $120,000 during 2012. Unrealized profits
included in ending inventories from these intercompany sales amounted to $8,000 at December 31, 2011, and $24,000
at December 31, 2012.
1. Consolidated cost of sales for 2012 should be:
a $950,000
b $966,000
c $934,000
d $926,000
2. Noncontrolling interest share for 2012 should be:
a $16,600
b $15,000
c $13,400
d $12,600
3. Controlling share of consolidated net income for 2012 should be:
a $381,000
b $379,400
c $365,000
d $350,600
ES58 CHAPTER 5
W 5-2
Computations and correcting journal entries (downstream)
Pep Corporation recorded $65,000 investment income from Son Corporation, its 80%-owned subsidiary, for
2012, and $70,000 for 2013. This investment income represented 80% of Sons reported income of $81,250 and
$87,500 in 2012 and 2013, respectively. Peps net income (including investment income) for 2012 was $240,000
and for 2012 it was $160,000.
During 2012 Pep sold merchandise to Son for $180,000. This merchandise cost Pep $130,000 and 40%
of it was inventoried by Son at December 31, 2012.
Pep sold merchandise that cost $150,000 to Son for $210,000 during 2013. The December 31, 2013, inventory of
Son included $63,000 of this merchandise.
REQUIRED
1. Compute the following:
a. Peps income from Son on a correct equity basis for 2012 and 2013
b. Consolidated net income for 2012 and 2013
2. Prepare journal entries to correct Peps books at December 31, 2013, assuming that closing entries at
December 31, 2013, have not been made.
W 5-3
Consolidated income statement (upstream sales)
Sap Corporation is an 80%-owned subsidiary of Par Corporation, acquired at book value on January 1, 2011, when
Saps assets and liabilities were equal to their fair values. During 2011, Sap sold $12,000 merchandise to Par at a 25%
gross profit (cost to Sap was $9,000). At December 31, 2011, Par included 40% of this merchandise in its inventory
at its purchase price from Sap.
Income statements for Par and Sap Corporation for 2011 follow (in thousands):
Sales
Income from Sap
Cost of sales
Other expenses
Net income
R E Q U I R E D : Prepare a consolidated statement for Par Corporation and Subsidiary for 2011
Electronic Supplement to Chapter 5 ES59
W 5-4
Journal entries and computations (upstream sales and incomplete equity method)
Sad is a 75%-owned subsidiary of Pod Corporation, acquired by Pod at book value (also fair value) on January 2,
2012. Comparative income statements for Pod and Sad for 2014 are as follows (in thousands):
Pod Sad
REQUIRED
1. Prepare any entries necessary to adjust Pods Investment in Sad account at December 31, 2014, and
income from Sad for 2014.
2. Determine the following:
a. Consolidated cost of goods sold for 2014.
b. Noncontrolling interest expense for 2014.
c. Consolidated net income for 2014.
W 5-5
Computations (downstream sales, cost method, no noncontrolling Interest)
Pat Corporation paid $2,900,000 for all the outstanding voting common stock of Set Corporation on January 2, 2005,
when Sets stockholders equity consisted of $1,500,000 common stock and $1,000,000 retained earnings. The excess
fair value over book value acquired was assigned to previously unrecorded patents with a 10-year amortization period.
Financial information relating to Sets income, dividends, and retained earnings for 2012 and 2013 follows (in thousands):
2012 2013
During 2013 Pat sold inventory items to Set for $120,000, and $20,000 intercompany profit from the sales was
unrealized at December 31. Sets December 31, 2012, inventory included $30,000 unrealized profit on merchandise
acquired from Pat.
Pat used the cost method of accounting for its investment in Set, and accordingly, Pats investment in Set
account balance has remained at $2,900,000 since acquisition.
Pats retained earnings balances at year-end 2012 and 2013 are $4,700,000 and $5,300,000, respectively.
REQUIRED
1. Determine the correct balance of Pats Investment in Set account at December 31, 2012, under the
equity method.
2. Determine Pats income from Set under the equity method for 2013.
3. Prepare a schedule to convert from the cost to the equity method in the consolidation working papers for 2013.
4. Prepare a consolidation working paper entry for 2013 to convert Pats accounts to an equity basis for
consolidation purposes. The entry should be based on the schedule prepared in 3.
ES60 CHAPTER 5
W 5-6
Prepare parent company and consolidated income statements (downstream sales)
Comparative income statements for Par Corporation and its 70%-owned subsidiary, Set Corporation, for 2009
follow (in thousands):
Par Set
2010
REQUIRED
1. Prepare a corrected income statement for Par Corporation for 2011 with Set Corporation being treated as
an equity investee.
2. Prepare a consolidated income statement for Par Corporation and Subsidiary for 2011.
W 5-7
Comparative separate-company and consolidated balance sheets for Pam Corporation and its 80%-owned
subsidiary, Say Corporation, at year-end 2012 are as follows (in thousands):
Pam Say
Investigation reveals that the consolidated balance sheet is in error because Pam Corporation has not amortized
patents and has not eliminated unrealized inventory profits. The investment in Say was acquired on January 1, 2009,
at a price $150,000 in excess of the book value and fair value. The original plan was to amortize patents over 20 years.
Unrealized profits in Says December 31, 2011 and 2012, inventories of merchandise acquired from Pam were
$30,000 and $50,000, respectively. Other current assets include intercompany receivables of $10,000.
Electronic Supplement to Chapter 5 ES61
R E Q U I R E D : Prepare consolidated balance sheet working papers on December 31, 2012, for Pam
Corporation and Subsidiary.