Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at .
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aea. .
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
American Economic Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The
American Economic Review.
http://www.jstor.org
An Almost Ideal Demand System
By ANGUS DEATON AND JOHN MUELLBAUER*
Ever since Richard Stone (1954) first In Section II, the model is estimated on
estimated a system of demand equations postwar British data and we use our results
derived explicitly from consumer theory, to test the homogeneity and symmetry re-
there has been a continuing search for strictions. Our results are consistent with
alternative specifications and functional earlier findings in that both sets of restric-
forms. Many models have been proposed, tions are decisively rejected. We also find
but perhaps the most important in current that imposition of homogeneity generates
use, apart from the original linear expendi- positive serial correlation in the errors of
ture system, are the Rotterdam model (see those equations which reject the restrictions
Henri Theil, 1965, 1976; Anton Barten) and most strongly; this suggests that the now
the translog model (see Laurits Christensen, standard rejection of homogeneity in de-
Dale Jorgenson, and Lawrence Lau; Jorgen- mand analysis may be due to insufficient
son and Lau). Both of these models have attention to the dynamic aspects of con-
been extensively estimated and have, in sumer behavior. Finally, in Section III, we
addition, been used to test the homogeneity offer a summary and conclusions. We be-
and symmetry restrictions of demand the- lieve that the results of this paper suggest
ory. In this paper, we propose and estimate that the AIDS is to be recommended as a
a new model which is of comparable gener- vehicle for testing, extending, and improving
ality to the Rotterdam and translog models conventional demand analysis. This does
but which has considerable advantages over not imply that the system, particularly in its
both. Our model, which we call the Almost simple static form, is to be regarded as a
Ideal Demand System (AIDS), gives an ar- fully satisfactory explanation of consumers'
bitrary first-order approximation to any de- behavior. Indeed, by proposing a demand
mand system; it satisfies the axioms of system which is superior to its predecessors,
choice exactly; it aggregates perfectly over we hope to be able to reveal more clearly
consumers without invoking parallel linear the problems and potential solutions asso-
Engel curves; it has a functional form which ciated with the usual approach.
is consistent with known household-budget
data; it is simple to estimate, largely avoid- I. Specificationof the AIDS
ing the need for non-linear estimation; and
it can be used to test the restrictions of In much of the recent literature on sys-
homogeneity and symmetry through linear tems of demand equations, the starting
restrictions on fixed parameters. Although point has been the specification of a func-
many of these desirable properties are tion which is general enough to act as a
possessed by one or other of the Rotterdam second-order approximation to any arbi-
or translog models, neither possesses all of trary direct or indirect utility function or,
them simultaneously. more rarely, a cost function. For examples,
In Section I of the paper, we discuss the see Christensen, Jorgenson, and Lau; W.
theoretical specification of the AIDS and Erwin Diewert (1971); or Ernst Berndt,
justify the claims in the previous paragraph. Masako Darrough, and Diewert. Alterna-
tively, it is possible to use a first-order
approximation to the demand functions
*University of Bristol, andBirkbeck College, London, themselves as in the Rotterdam model, see
respectively. We are grateful to David Mitchell for help
with the calculations and to Anton Barten, David
Theil (1965, 1976); Barten. We shall follow
He ndry, Claus Leser, Louis Phlips, and a referee for these approaches in terms of generality but
helpful comments on an earlier version. we start, not from some arbitrary preference
312
VOL. 70 NO. 3 DEA TON AND MUELLBA UER: IDEAL DEMAND SYSTEM 313
ordering, but from a specific class of prefer- mogeneous in p (as it must be to be a valid
ences, which by the theorems of Muellbauer representation of preferences) provided that
(1975, 1976) permit exact aggregation over j21ai 1,
l XYk*=Xki=Xf j=O It is also
consumers: the representation of market de- straightforward to check that (4) has enough
mands as if they were the outcome of deci- parameters for it to be a flexible functional
sions by a rational representative consumer. form provided it is borne in mind that, since
These preferences, known as the PIGLOG utility is ordinal, we can always choose
class, are represented via the cost or expendi- a normalization such that, at a point,
ture function which defines the minimum a2logC/au2=0. The choice of the functions
expenditure necessary to attain a specific a(p) and b(p) in (2) and (3) is governed
utility level at given prices. We denote this partly by the need for a flexible functional
function c(u,p) for utility u and price vector form. However, the main justification is that
p, and define the PIGLOG class by this particular choice leads to a system of
demand functions with the desirable proper-
(1)
ties which we demonstrate below.
logc(u,p)=(1 - u)log{a(p)} + ulog{b(p)} The demand functions can be derived di-
rectly from equation (4). It is a fundamental
With some exceptions (see the Appendix), u property of the cost function (see Ronald
lies between 0 (subsistence) and 1 (bliss) so Shephard, 1953, 1970, or Diewert's 1974
that the positive linearly homogeneous func- survey paper) that its price derivatives are
tions a(p) and b(p) can be regarded as the the quantities demanded: ac(u,p)/apj=q.
costs of subsistence and bliss, respectively. Multiplying both sides by pi/c(u,p) we find
The Appendix further discusses this general
model as well as the implications of the (5) alogc(u,p) piqi
underlying aggregation theory. alogp, = c(u,p)
Next we take specific functional forms for
log a(p) and log b(p). For the resulting cost
function to be a flexible functional form, it where wi is the budget share of good i.
must possess enough parameters so that at Hence, logarithmic differentiation of (4)
any single point its derivatives ac/api, gives the budget shares as a function of
ac/au, a2c/apiapj, a2c/auapi, and a2c/au2 prices and utility:
can be set equal to those of an arbitrary cost
function. We take j 8 l p Ok
(6) wi = ai E Y logp1+fu0
(2) log a(p)= aO+ E ak logPk
k
where
2 E Yk*,l?gPk 109P,
k j (7) (Y'J+ YJ*)
Provided (10), (1 1), and (12) hold, equation which, when applied to (8') gives
(8) represents a system of demand functions
which add up to total expenditure (Ewi = 1), -
(8") = ai + E y. logp1-/i log P
are homogeneous of degree zero in prices
and total expenditure taken together,
and which satisfy Slutsky symmetry. Given
+ YtEXh 1?g(Xhl/kh )/E Xh}
these, the AIDS is simply interpreted: in the
absence of changes in relative prices and
"real" expenditure (x/P) the budget shares Define the aggregate index k by
are constant and this is the natural starting
point for predictions using the model.
Changes in relative prices work through the (13) log(x/k)= E xhlog(xhlkh / xh
h
terms yij; each yij represents 102 times the
effect on the ith budget share of a 1 percent where x is the average level of total expendi-
increase in the jth price with (x/P) held ture Xh.Hence (8") becomes
constant. Changes in real expenditure oper-
ate through the /ARcoefficients; these add to (8"') iwi=ai+ '
zero and are positive for luxuries and nega- y,ylogpj+,8ilog(xi/kP)
i
tive for necessities. Further interpretation is
best done in terms of the claims made in the This is identical in form to (8') and this
introduction. confirms that under these assumptionsag-
gregatebudget sharescorrespondto the de-
A. Aggregation Over Households cisions of a rational representativehouse-
hold whose preferences are given by the
The aggregation theory developed in AIDS cost function(4) and whose budget is
Muellbauer (1975, 1976, of which the main given by x-/k, the "representativebudget
relevant points are summarized in the Ap- level."
pendix) implies that exact aggregation is The index k has an interestinginterpreta-
possible if, for an individual household h, tion. If each householdhad the same tastes
behavior is described by the generalization (kh= 1, all h), k would be an index of the
VOL. 70 NO. 3 DEA TON AND MUELLBA UER: IDEAL DEMAND SYSTEM 315
equality of the distribution of household other flexible forms such as the translog or
budgets. In fact, this index is identical to the Rotterdam models. However, if maxi-
Theil's (1972) entropy measure of equality Z mizing behavior is not assumed but it is
deflated by the number of households H, simply held that demands are continuous
where logZ=-X(xh/X)log(xh/X) and X functions of the budget and of prices, then
is the aggregate budget; Z reaches its maxi- the AIDS demand functions (8) (without
mum level of H when there is perfect equal- the restrictions (11) and (12)) can still pro-
ity so that Xh= x, all h. Therefore as inequal- vide a first-order approximation. In general,
ity increases, k = Z/ H decreases and the without maximizing assumptions, we can
representative budget level increases. When think of the budget shares wi as being un-
kh differs across households, for example, known functions of logp and logx. From
because of differences in household com- (8) and (9), the AIDS has derivatives
position, the index k reflects not only the awi/alogx=A/3 and awi/alogp1=y -- 8-
distribution of budgets but the demographic AfEYjklogPk so that, at any point, f and
structure. Ideally, one might attempt to y can be chosen so that the derivatives of
model the variation of kh with household the AIDS will be identical to those of any
characteristics in a cross-section study and, true model. Given that the a parameters act
given time-series data on the joint distribu- as intercepts, the AIDS can thus provide a
tion of household budgets and characteris- local first-order approximation to any true
tics, construct a series for k for use in fitting demand system, whether derived from the
(8"'). Data limitations have prevented us theory of choice or not. This property is
from carrying out this proposal in the em- important since it means that tests of homo-
pirical application below. To the extent that geneity of symmetry are set within a main-
k is constant or uncorrelated with x orp, no tained hypothesis which makes sense and
omitted variable bias arises from our proce- would be widely accepted in its own right.
dure of omitting k and redefining a!*= ai - Generality is not without its problems,
A log k* where k* is the constant or sample however. There is a large number of param-
mean value of k. eters in (18) and on most data sets these are
When the distribution of household bud- unlikely to be all well determined. It is thus
gets and household characteristics is invar- important that there should exist some
iant except for equiproportional changes in straightforward procedure for eliminating
household budgets, k is constant. In this unnecessary parameters without untoward
case there is considerable extra scope for consequences for the properties of the
taste variations in the individual demand model. In the AIDS, this can be done by
functions without altering the validity of placing whatever restrictions on yij parame-
the representative consumer hypothesis em- ters are thought to be empirically or theor-
bodied in (8"'). Indeed, it turns out that not etically plausible. As we shall see below, in
only aih, all i, but also yij, all i,j, can differ many cases it will be possible to impose
over households. The ai and y. parameters these restrictions on a single equation basis.
in (8"') are then weighted averages of the One obvious restriction is that for some
micro parameters. pairs (i,j),-y, should be zero; for such pairs
the budget share of each is independent of
the price of the other if (x/P) is held con-
B. Generalityof the Model stant. It can be shown that yij has approxi-
mately the same sign as the compensated
The flexible functional form property of cross-price elasticity and this is also useful
the AIDS cost function implies that the in suggesting prior restrictions. We should
demand functions derived from it are first- not however expect all the y,,s to be zero;
order approximations to any set of demand the resulting model, wi= ai + A9log(x/P) is
functions derived from utility-maximizing extremely restrictive and has been tested
behavior. The AIDS is thus as general as and rejected by Deaton (1978).
316 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW JUNE 1980
easily seen that a = 0 is still required for be seen by writing (17) in full, i.e.,
adding up, since E 8, = 0.
In the empirical results below we shall
estimate both (15) and (16), and show that (18) A?wiw=AiAlogx- E akA4logPk
k
the latter is an excellent approximation to
the former. However, it must be emphasized
that (16) exists only as an approxima- 2 E X YkjA(logPjlogpk) + z y/i logpj
tion to (15) and will only be accurate in 2k j J
specific circumstances, albeit widely occur-
ring ones in time-series estimation. Note Again, all the parameters (except ao) are
finally that if single equation estimation is theoretically identified, but in practice the
used to investigate likely restrictions substitutability between y..s and f3-a1sin fit-
amongst the y parameters, as is suggested in ting (18) if prices are nearly collinear means
Part B above, the constrained OLS estimates that, in such cases, the only practical way of
will no longer automatically be maximum estimating (17) is to replace AlogP by some
likelihood, efficient, or satisfy adding up. index, for example, A(Y Wklogpk) as before
Hence, once the restrictions have been or by its approximationZWkAlogpk. In the
selected, (15) should be used to reestimate latter case, the right-hand side of (17) be-
the whole system. comes identical to the right-hand side of the
Rotterdam model which is
estimated parameter values to preferences one equation fit perfectly.' This difficulty
themselves becomes of great significance. can only be resolved by assuming a particu-
lar structure for the variance-covariance
II. An Application to Postwar British Data matrix of the residuals. Following Deaton
(1975, p. 39), we assume V= a2(I- ii'),
In this section we estimate the model where V is the variance-covariance matrix
using annual British data from 1954 to 1974 of the residuals, a2 is a (positive) parameter
inclusive on eight nondurable groups of to be estimated, I is an n x n identity matrix
consumers' expenditure, namely, food, and i is a vector each of the elements of
clothing, housing services, fuel, drink and which is (n)- 1/2. In this case, maximum-like-
tobacco, transport and communication lihood estimation reduces to least squares so
services, other goods, and other services. As that instead of minimizing the determinant
discussed in Section I, Part A above, if we of the matrix of residual cross products, we
assume that the index k in (8"') is either minimize its trace. The likelihood values
constant or that its deviations are indepen- quoted below are calculated on this assump-
dently distributed from those of the average tion. Once again, maximum use is made of
budget x- and of prices, no biases result from substitution in the estimation so that, under
its omission. In particular, we allow the in- symmetry, (15) is estimated using only the
tercepts in (8"') to absorb the - fAlog k fourteen independent ai*s and A3isand the
terms. We then proceed by first following twenty-eight parameters forming the upper
the strategy outlined in Section I, Part D, right-hand triangle of y with its final row
setting logP* = X Wk logpk for each year and and column deleted. We now check that P*
estimating equation (16) for each good sep- and P are sufficiently close to allow com-
arately by OLS. The system is then reesti- parison of likelihoods both by direct evalua-
mated, equation by equation, and again tion of both indices and by reestimation of
using P*, in order to test the homogeneity the unrestricted and homogeneous models
condition. Equation (11) is imposed by sub- using P as evaluated from the symmetric
stitution so that instead of (16), we estimate estimates. It is also possible to check con-
cavity at this stage by using the symmetric
parameter estimates to calculate the eigen-
(20) wi= a,*+ 2- Yijlog(P) + Aiog( p*J) values of the matrix in (14). Finally, the
whole process is repeated with the model
written in first differences, that is, equation
At this stage, F-ratios are calculated equa- (17) with the addition of intercepts. Collin-
tion by equation to test the validity of the earity prevented any successful attempt to
restriction. link P to the parameter estimates in these
The next stage is to impose symmetry of regressions; instead, the value of P calcu-
y, at this point replacing P* by the "correct" lated from the symmetric estimation in
price index (9) with ao set to some ap- levels was used throughout.
propriate value. Since symmetry, unlike Note that we choose to test symmetry
homogeneity or the unrestricted model, whether or not homogeneity is rejected. This
involves cross-equation restrictions, the vari- procedure has been criticized by Grayham
ance-covariance matrix of the residuals for Mizon who suggests that optimal inference
the first time plays a part in the estimation. requires that further testing be abandoned
Since this is unknown a priori, normal prac- as soon as a rejection is encountered.
tice would be to replace it by its maximum Mizon's criticism would be correct if we
likelihood estimate. However, with only were certain of our maintained hypothesis,
twenty-one observations, this is not practi- but to some extent this is a matter of choice.
cable for equation (15) since, with so many Many economists would choose not to test
parameters in each equation, the likelihood 'We are grateful to Teun Kloek for pointing this out
can be made arbitrarily large by making any to us.
VOL. 70 NO. 3 DEA TON AND MUELLBA UER: IDEAL DEMAND SYSTEM 319
S.EE.
Commodityi ai* pi 'YiI 'Y2 Ye0 Y44 Yes 'y6 'Yn Yig Yj (10 2 D. W.
Food 1.221 -0160 0.186 -0.077 -0.013 -0.020 -0.058 0.032 0.015 -0.098 -0.033 .113 0.999 2.33
(7.4) (-6.1) (9.8) (-4.3) (-0.8) (-1.1) (-6.2) (1.3) (0.7) (-4.2) (-4.4) .180 0.998 1.74
Clothing -0.482 0.091 0.033 0.016 -0.024 -0.026 -0.029 0.014 0.033 -0.049 -0.032 .106 0.984 2.29
(-3.1) (3.7) (1.8) (1.0) (-1.6) (-1.5) (-3.3) (0.6) (1.6) (-2.2) (-4.5) .171 0.955 1.55
Housing 0.793 -0.104 -0.082 -0.9 0.088 0.9 0.033 -0.055 -0.030 0.098 0.051 .086 0.999 1.89
(6.3) (-5.1) (-5.6) (-0.7) (7.2) (0.7) (4.7) (-2.9) (-1.8) (5.5) (9.1) .241 0.992 1.29
Fuel -0.159 0.033 -0.042 0.010 -0.011 0.037 -0.004 0.022 0.007 -0.031 -0.010 .140 0.883 2.25
(-0.8) (1.0) (- 1.8) (0.4) (-0.5) (1.6) (-0.3) (0.7) (0.3) (- 1.1) (- 1.1) .141 0.870 2.03
Drink and -0.043 0.028 -0.043 0.034 -0.027 -0.020 0.056 0.005 -0.018 0.014 0.001 .099 0.969 2.96
Tobacco (-0.3) (1.2) (-2.6) (2.2) (- 1.9) (- 1.2) (6.9) (0.2) (-0.9) (0.7) (0.0) .095 0.969 2.93
Transport and -0.061 0.029 -0.022 -0.012 -0.002 0.011 0.060 -0.023 -0.024 0.053 0.040 .047 1.000 2.24
Communication(-0.9) (2.6) (-2.7) (-1.6) (-0.3) (1.4) (15.2) (-2.2) (-2.6) (5.3) (13.1) .184 0.992 1.36
Other Goods -0.038 0.022 0.001 -0.003 -0.001 -0.006 -0.030 0.007 0.032 -0.006 -0.005 .108 0.885 1.92
(-0.2) (0.9) (0.0) (-0.2) (-0.0) (-0.3) (-3.4) (0.3) (1.5) (-0.2) (0.7) .106 0.880 1.91
Other Services -0.231 0.060 -0.032 0.041 -0.011 0.014 -0.028 -0.003 -0.015 0.019 -0.014 .107 0.843 2.27
(-1.5) (2.4) (- 1.8) (2.4) (-0.7) (0.8) (-3.1) (-0.1) (-0.7) (0.9) (-2.0) .119 0.788 1.98
homogeneity, treating absence of money umns of Table 2 and, although food has an
illusion as a maintained hypothesis; the test (insignificant) positive price elasticity, these
of symmetry would then be the interesting numbers appear both credible and in line
one. Even if the maintained hypothesis with other studies. Note the general price
turns out to be false, tests based on it are inelasticity of demand; only transport and
not necessarily without interest. Few if any communication appear to be price elastic.
tests in econometrics are carried out within Table 1 also shows, in the column headed
the framework of maintained hypotheses yzij, the row sums of the unconstrained Yij
which are even widely accepted, let alone of matrix; this number shows 102 times the
unchallengeable validity. absolute effect on each value share of a 1
Table 1 reports the first-stage estimates of percent increase in all prices and total ex-
(16) using P* and without any constraints penditure. Under homogeneity, this should
on the parameters save (10) which are auto- be zero and the bracketed numbers given
matically and costlessly satisfied. The esti- are t-tests of the significance of the devia-
mates of /8 classify food and housing tion from zero. These numbers are, of
as necessities while the other goods are course, identical to the square roots of the
luxuries. A large number of y coefficients F-ratios obtained by comparing the residual
are significantly different from zero; twenty- sums of squares of equations (16) and (20).
two out of sixty-four have t-values ab- Hence, a proportional increase in prices and
solutely larger than 2. Even so, none of the expenditure will decrease expenditure on
variables considered have any detectable food and on clothing, and increase expendi-
effect on the value share for fuel and very ture on housing and transport and com-
few have influence in the other goods munication. These are also the commodities
or other services equations. Similarly, the for which the elasticities suffer the largest
prices of fuel, of transport and communica- changes between columns 1 and 2 and col-
tion, and of other services have little or no umns 3 and 4 of Table 2. Other deviations
effect anywhere (except, of course, through from homogeneity appear not to be signifi-
P* and the value share itself), while the cant. The final columns of Table 1 give
prices of food, drink and tobacco, and of equations standard errors, the R 2 and
other services appear with considerable reg- Durbin-Watson (D. W.) statistics for free
ularity. The total expenditure and own-price and restricted estimation. Note that for the
elasticities are shown in the first two col- four commodity groups where homogeneity
320 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW JUNE 1980
P* P P P* P* P
TABLE4-COMPARATIVE
VALUES
OF2 LOG LIKELIHOOD
dure of starting with P*, calculating OLS ple, it is possible to introduce habits into
regressions, computing a new P, and repeat- demand functions so that, if they are
ing will be a computationally efficient way allowed for, symmetry can be expected to
of obtaining good estimates of the full non- hold, while if ignored, symmetry will be
linear system. destroyed.
Symmetry, unlike homogeneity, cannot be The full set of symmetric parameter
tested on an equation-by-equation basis and estimates are not included here for reasons
we must rely on a large-sample likelihood- of space. The most interesting property of
ratio test for the system as a whole. For these, apart from symmetry, is in their im-
comparison, twice the logarithm of the like- plications for negativity. To assess this, the
lihood is 1722.5 for the unconstrained sys- K matrix of equation (14) was evaluated for
tem, 1579.6 for the homogeneous model (a each year in the sample and its eigenvalues
fall which reflects the individual restrictions) calculated. One of these is identically zero
and this falls further to 1491.0 under sym- and, for concavity, the others should be
metry. Since symmetry embodies twenty- negative. Contrary to this, we found one
one constraints over and above the seven of positive eigenvalue for the early part of the
homogeneity, the restriction is rejected on period, increasing to two by the end. The
an asymptotically valid X2-test whether or most obvious symptom of nonconcavity in
not the maintained hypothesis is taken to the symmetric estimates was an estimated
contain homogeneity. Once again, this is positive compensated own-price elasticity
consistent with earlier results although rejec- for fuel throughout the sample period. This
tion of symmetry given homogeneity is not may seem to be of limited importance given
always clear-cut in the studies cited above. that the symmetric homogeneous model has
The interpretation of the rejection is not already been rejected; if the cost function
clear without some convincing explanation doesn't exist, why worry about its concav-
of the lack of homogeneity. Without this, it ity? However, for several reasons it would
is impossible to know whether or not we be extremely useful to have parameter
should expect symmetry to hold. For exam- estimates for a reasonably general concave
322 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW JUNE 1980
where the constants qi are introduced pri- In this paper we have introduced a new
marily for econometric reasons but, if sig- system of demand equations, the AIDS, in
nificant, would imply time trends in the which the budget shares of the various com-
original model which expresses the variables modities are linearly related to the loga-
in levels. The P is taken as in Table 3. In rithm of real total expenditure and the loga-
these regressions homogeneity is only re- rithms of relative prices. The model is
jected for food and for transport and com- shown to possess most of the properties
munication; clothing and housing, which usually thought desirable in conventional
rejected homogeneity in the earlier re- demand analysis, and to do so in a way not
gressions, now yield insignificant F-ratios. matched by any single competing system.
Closer inspection reveals that for both these Fitted to postwar British data, the AIDS is
cases, the constant term qi, which is insigni- capable of explaining a high proportion of
ficant without constraints, becomes signifi- the variance of the commodity budget
cant when homogeneity is imposed. Simi- shares but, unless allowance is made for
larly, for transport and communication mi omitted variables by the arbitrary use of
VOL. 70 NO. 3 DEA TON AND MUELLBA UER: IDEAL DEMAND SYSTEM 323
time trends, does so in a way which is have the "generalized linear" (GL) form:
inconsistent with the hypothesis of con-
sumers making decisions according to the (A2)
model's demand functions governed by the Wih(XhIP) = Vh(Xh,p)Ai(p) + Bi(p) + Cih(p)
conventional static budget constraint. These
results suggest that influences other than where Vh,Ai,Bi, and Cih are functions satis-
current prices and current total expenditure fying XiAj=XiCih=X-hCih=O and EBi=l.
must be systematically modelled if even the Clearly, (Al) goes beyond the usual for-
broad pattern of demand is to be explained mulation of xo = xE, and, as we shall see
in a theoretically coherent and empirically below, allows us to incorporate into the
robust way. Whether these developments demand functions features of the expendi-
generalize the static framework by including ture distribution other than the mean.
stock effects, errors in price perceptions, or Of particular interest is the case where xo
by going beyond the assumption of weak is independent of prices, depending only on
intertemporal separability on which the the individual xs. This occurs if, and only if,
static model rests, we believe that the AIDS, the vh function in (A2) restricts to
with its simplicity of structure, generality,
and conformity with the theory, offers a (A3) vh(xh,p) ={ 1-(xh/kh) a}
platform on which such developments can
proceed. where a is a constant and kh, although not a
function of Xh, and p is free to vary from
APPENDIX: AIDS IN THE CONTEXT household to household. In this case, the
OF AGGREGATIONTHEORY budget shares are said to have the "price-in-
dependent generalized linear" form (PIGL).
In Muellbauer (1975, 1976), a definition Note the special case of (A3) as a->O, i.e.,
of the existence conditions for a representa-
tive consumer is given which allows more (A4) Vh(Xh,P) = log(Xh / kh)
general behavior than the parallel linear En-
gel curves which are required if average For obvious reasons, this is referred to as
demands are to be a function of the average the PIGLOG case. By substituting (A3) in
budget. We know that in general, the (A2), (A1) can be used to give an explicit
average budget share form for xo, viz.,
parameter of (A3), and (with some excep- outlay of the household. This averaging is
tions discussed below) 0 <u < 1. The quan- even more obvious in the value share equa-
tity kh can be used to allow for family tions (A9) and (A 10). Since (1 - u)(a/x)a
composition effects within PIGL; for the and u(b/x)a sum to unity, as do (1- u) and
standard or "reference" household kh is u, these equations give the actual budget
unity. shares as weighted averages of ai and bi.
Since the AIDS is a member of the PIG- Since the value shares of luxuries increase
LOG family, and hence of PIGL, we can with total outlay and hence with u, we can
achieve maximum generality by discussing characterize luxuries and necessities simply
some of the important properties of this by whether bi is greater than or less than ai.
class. If, omitting the household subscript, Inferior goods are not excluded under PIGL
we write q* for the quantity demanded of and it is straightforward to construct exam-
good i, then, by the derivative property of ples from both (A9) and (AIO).
the cost function, q = ac1pj so that wi= Note finally that there are restrictions on
p,q,/x = alogc/alogpj. Hence from (A6), the possible set of x and p over which the
taking kh= 1, and differentiating cost function and the associated demands
are valid. One set of restrictions is implied
(A8) ac a alogc= aa aai(-1u) + uab abi by the necessity that, for all i, 0 < wi < 1. The
alogp1 upper bound is relevant when bi >ai and
implies that u = (xa - aa)/(ba - aa) <
where a,=aloga/1logpj and b1=alogb/ min{I - ai(a/x)a }/ {(b/x)bi - (a/x)aia}].
a logpi. Hence, substituting x for c, The lower bound, relevant when bi <ai re-
quires similarly that u = (x a a)/(b aa)
> maxj[(a/x)aa1/{(a/x)a/x - (b/x)abi}].
( ) i ( )( x )i (x )i The second set of restrictions are those re-
quired to ensure that the cost function is
where, from (A6), u=(xa- aa)/(ba- aa) concave. From (A6), we can see that a
or from (A7), u=(logx-loga)/(logb- sufficient condition for concavity of c(u,p) is
log a). Similarly, when a = 0, that a(p) and b(p) be concave and that
0 < u < 1. However, this is by no means nec-
(AIO) wi= (I -u)a + ubi essary. If b(p) is "more concave" than a(p),
then c(u,p) is concave for u >0 and for a
Equations (A9) and (A10) have attractive range of u > 1. It can be shown that the
interpretations. Cost c(u,p) is increasing in PIGL cost function is concave for all x > 0,
utility as long as b(p) is greater than p > 0 if and only if ai = bi for all i, and a(p)
a(p)-note that this does not depend on the and b(p) are concave. In this not very inter-
sign of a-so that as u increases from 0 to esting case, preferences are homothetic.
1, c(u,p) increases from a(p) to b(p) with wi The practical application of the PIGL
moving from ai to bi. Hence a total expendi- class requires selection of specific functional
ture of a(p) can be thought of as "poverty" forms for the functions a(p) and b(p); those
expenditure with associated expenditure leading to the AIDS have been discussed in
pattern ai, while b(p) is "affluence" ex- the text. However, the PIGL class is related
penditure with budget shares bi. On this to two other well-known models. Note first
interpretation x = a(p) and x = b(p) are the that if a = 1, and kh= 1, (A6) becomes the
equations of the tangents to the poverty Gorman polar form. The PIGL class thus
and affluence indifference curves, respec- includes all models with linear Engel curves,
tively, u = 0 and u = 1. From (A6) therefore, for example, linear expenditure system, the
we see that the tangent to the indifference quadratic utility function, as special cases.
curve actually attained is the mean of order Perhaps less obviously, a weakly restricted
a of poverty and affluence tangents, the form of the indirect translog is also PIG-
weights depending on the welfare level or LOG. From Jorgenson and Lau the translog
VOL. 70 NO. 3 DEA TON AND MUELLBA UER: IDEAL DEMAND SYSTEM 325
Stud., Oct. 1975, 62, 525-43. Pattern of British Demand," Econ. J.,
, "Community Preferences and the Sept. 1954, 64, 511-27.
Representative Consumer," Econometrica, Henri Theil, "The Information Approach to
Sept. 1976, 44, 979-99. Demand Analysis," Econometrica, Jan.
R. W. Shephard,Cost and Production Func- 1965, 33, 67-87.
tions, Princeton 1953. , Statistical Decomposition Anal-
, Theoryof Cost and Production Func- ysis with Applications in the Social and
tions, Princeton 1970. Administrative Sciences, Amsterdam 1972.
J. R. N. Stone, The Measurement of Con- , Theory and Measurement of Con-
sumers' Expenditure and Behaviour in the sumer Demand, Vols. 1 and 2, Amsterdam
United Kingdom, 1920-1938, Vol. 1, Cam- 1976.
bridge 1953. H. Working,"Statistical Laws of Family Ex-
, "Linear Expenditure Systems and penditure," J. Amer. Statist. Assn., Mar.
Demand Analysis: An Application to the 1943, 38, 43-56.