Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Body modification has been practiced for thousands of years all over the world (Greif,
Hewitt & Armstrong, 1999). It has changed from a practice which was once considered
taboo, to a widely accepted art form (DeMello, 1995). Although body modification,
such as tattoos and piercings, have been thought to have been signs of deviance, over
the past 20 years they have begun to filter into mainstream culture (Hewitt, 1997). In
todays society, many people are using their bodies as their canvas to express their
personal identity or make a statement of self by tattooing and piercing (Caplan, 2000).
We cannot be completely sure how many people have body modifications because it is
commonly a private practice but it has been reported that between 7 million and 20
million adults have modified their body. Other reports say 25% of 15 to 25-year-olds
have body modification (Geif, Hewitt, & Armstrong, 1999). Although this practice is
becoming widely accepted, that does not mean there are not stereotypes of those who
choose to modify their body with tattoos and body piercings. A survey about this was
conducted by Valut.com, an online management site. Out of 500 employers surveyed,
more than half said they were less likely to hire people with visible tattoos or body
piercings (Garza, 2001). Employers commonly share this opinion because tattoos and
piercings are most commonly associated with deviance, rebelliousness, or risky
behavior. Forbes, who surveyed college students on the motivations for body
modification, reported participants who had tattoos and piercings admitted to have
taken part in more risky behaviors than people who had not modified their body.
(2001). In another study, which surveyed college students about their body
modification practices, 39% reported having used recreational drugs and 24% reported
daily cigarette use (Greif, Hewitt, & Armstrong, 1999). Another Study, which
specifically looked at behavioral and self-concept differences between tattooed and
non-tattooed students, reported that body modification was associated with somewhat
deviant or risky behaviors showed that students with tattoos smoke more cigarettes. If
they were male, they had more sexual partners and were more likely to have been
arrested and if they were female, they were more likely to have used drugs and
shoplifted (Drews, Allison, & Probst, 2000). Many studies have been done concerning
body modification. Most studies done on body modification have dealt with the
correlation between body modification and risky behavior. However, a study has yet to
be done which attempts to find a correlation between body modification and academic
performance, more specifically GPA. This study strived to find just that, correlation
between body modification, specifically tattoos and body piercings, and grade point
average. Based on previous research, it was hypothesized that there would be a
negative correlation between body modification and GPA, in that the more piercings
and tattoos the lower ones GPA would be.
METHOD
Participants Participants in this study included 75 Loyola University New Orleans
students. Participants included 41 females and 34 males between the ages of 18 and
23. All participants in this study were volunteers. Some participants were recruited
from the Psychology Human Participants Pool by signing up on a sheet posted on the
psychology board and by convenience sampling. Materials Informed consent forms
were used containing information about procedures, benefits and risks of participating,
an explanation how to acquire the results of the research, availability of counseling
services, voluntary participation, and contact information of the researchers. The
purpose of the study was also on the consent form. Additional materials included a
self-compiled survey (see appendix). The survey included six demographic questions
which included GPA. The survey also included a section in which the participant was
asked to list how many piercings and tattoos they has and where they were on their
body. Earlobe piercings were excluded. A personality survey was also included to see if
there were significant differences between those with body modification and those
without. This survey was a Likert scale in which there were 15 adjective pairs. The
participants were asked to select the number along the scale that most closely
describes them or their preferences. Design and Procedure The research design of this
study was non-experimental and correlational as it studied the relationship between
the presence of body modifications and GPA. The variables in this study were body
modification, which could range from no body modification to more than two body
modifications, and GPA. As participants arrived they were asked to have a seat and
sign two informed consent forms. One was to be turned into the researcher and one
was to be kept for the participant. After obtaining informed consent, the researcher
gave each participant a survey packet and explained that they may cease participation
at any time. The researcher then asked the participants to please read the directions
carefully and fill out both the demographic and body modification sections of the
survey to the best of their ability. After the surveys were completed and turned in the
researchers debriefed the participants and told them that the study was actually
looking for a correlation between body modification and GPA. The participants were
than asked if they had any questions and thanked for their cooperation.
RESULTS
A Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient showed there was no significant
relationship between the GPA and body modification (r = -.131). This does not support
the hypothesis of a negative correlation between GPA and body modification. Another
Pearson Product-moment correlation coefficient was run on body modifications and sex
which showed a significant relationship (r = -.336). A T-test was performed and
indicated a significant difference between the number of body modifications males had
(M = .53, SD = .83) and the number of body modifications females had (M = 1.07, SD
= .72). Females reported having significantly more body modifications than males ( p<
.003, df = 74). No other significant differences in personality or demographics were
found between participants with and without body modifications.
DISCUSSION
The hypothesis was not supported. There was no correlation found between GPA and
body modification. Although there was no previous research in this area, it was
suspected that this study would yield results similar to research done concerning body
modifications and risky behavior. Risky behavior and body modifications had a positive
correlation in previous research, therefore, body modification and GPA would have a
negative correlation (Drews, Allison, & Probst, 2000). Results show no relationship
between the two variables. It is possible though that these results are due to the
limitations of this study. There were many limitations in this study because it was not
representative of all people with body modifications. This study was limited to
undergraduate students attending Loyola University New Orleans. These students all
have similar qualities and therefore there was not much variation among participants.
Students with a GPA lower than 2.0 were not represented at all in the sample. There
could be two possible explanations for this. One, students with a GPA lower than 2.0
are unlikely to volunteer for a psychology study. Two, because Loyola University is a
competitive school, students are required to keep a sufficient GPA to continue
attending school. A correlation maybe found if this study was replicated with a more
diverse sample. Another limitation of this study was the personality portion of the
survey. The directions instructed participants to select the number along the scale that
most closely describes them or their preferences. It is possible that some participants,
who were familiar with Likert scales, ignored the directions and went straight to
completing the survey. If this happened, the participants would not have known that
the scale was not only assessing themselves but also their preferences. Participants
could also have misunderstood certain adjective pairs. Limitations such as participant
laziness and boredom could have contributed to the results of the study as well. Also,
because body modification is often a private practice, it is possible that although they
were informed of the anonymity of their answers some participants chose not to
disclose the information about their body modifications. Also, participants may have
figured out before being debriefed that the study was looking for a correlation between
GPA and body modifications. If this happened it is possible that participants answered
the survey in a different way than they would have if they did not know the true
reason for the study. Because of the numerous limitations of this study it does not
have very high validity. Even without high validity, this study opens the door to
research concerning GPA and body modification which had not been done before. If
this study was repeated with a larger sample, which was more representative of the
population, the results would be much more accurate and possibly different. Results of
this study can inform those who have modified their body or are considering body
modification about certain characteristics body modification commonly correlates with.
This information can also help people understand the stereotypes about body
modification and if they have any truth behind them. Body modification has become a
common art form in todays society. This study did not find a relationship between
body modification and GPA. Unfortunately, this study could not confirm or deny the
negative stigmas that are associated with body modifications. But, with further
research in this area we maybe able to positively state whether those stigmas are true
or false.
REFERENCES
Caplan, J. (Ed.). (2000). Written on the body: the tattoo in European and American
history. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.DeMello, M. (1995). Not Just for
Bikers Anymore: Popular Representations of American Tattooing. Journal of Popular
Culture, 29, 37-52.Drews, D.R., Allison, C.K., & Probst, J.R. (2000). Behavioral and
Self-Concept Differences in Tattooed and Nontattooed College Students. Psychological
Reports, 86, 475-481. Forbes, G.B. (2001). College Students with Tattoos and
Piercings: Motives, Family Experiences, Personality Factors, and Perception by Others.
Psychological Reports, 89, 774-786.Garza, R. (2001). Marked For Unemployment.
Daily Texan . Retrieved March 1, 2003, from
http://navisite.collegeclub.com/servlet/channels.ChannelArticleServlet?areaid=7&articl
ed=14Greif, J., Hewitt, W., & Armstrong, M.L. (1999). Tattooing and Body Piercing.
Clinical- Nursing Research, 8, 368-385. Hewitt, K. (1997). Mutilating the Body:
Identity in Blood and Ink. Bowling green, OH: Bowling Green State University Popular
Press.
APPENDIX
AppendixSurvey QuestionsThank you for agreeing to answer this survey.
Your answers will be kept anonymous. Please answer all questions to the
best of your ability. A. How many piercings, excluding ears, do you
have? ____________B. Please fill in the appropriate information in the
table. Column 1 is for the body part where each piercing is located, and
column 2 is to record the number of piercings at each body part. You may
continue onto the back of the paper if space be needed.Example:Body Part
Body Part Number of Piercings
__________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________ C. How many tattoos do you
have? ________________D. Please fill in the appropriate information in
the table. Column 1 is for the body part where each tattoo is located,
and column 2 is to record the number of tattoos at each body part. You
may continue onto the back of the paper if space be needed.
A. Freshman
B. Sophomore
C. Junior
D. Senior
____________ years
___________________
A. Female
B. Male
A. Asian
B. Caucasian C. Hispanic
D. African American
E. Other
1. Quiet 1 2 3 4 5 Talkative
2. Tolerant 1 2 3 4 5 Critical
3. Disorganized 1 2 3 4 5 Organized
4. Tense 1 2 3 4 5 Calm
5. Imaginative 1 2 3 4 5 Conventional
6. Reserved 1 2 3 4 5 Outgoing
7. Uncooperative1 2 3 4 5 Cooperative
8.Unreliable 1 2 3 4 5 Dependable
9. Insecure 1 2 3 4 5 Secure
Bavdekar, Sandeep B. and Sneha Chandak. "Results: Unraveling the Findings." Journal of the
Association of Physicians of India 63 (September 2015): 44-46; Brett, Paul. "A Genre Analysis of
the Results Section of Sociology Articles." English for Specific Speakers 13 (1994): 47-59; Burton,
Neil et al. Doing Your Education Research Project. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2008; Results. The
Structure, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper. Department of Biology.
Bates College; Kretchmer, Paul. Twelve Steps to Writing an Effective Results Section. San
Francisco Edit; "Reporting Findings." In Making Sense of Social Research Malcolm Williams, editor.
(London;: SAGE Publications, 2003) pp. 188-207.
NOTE: Just as the literature review should be arranged under conceptual categories
rather than systematically describing each source, organize your findings under key
themes related to addressing the research problem. This can be done under either
format noted above [i.e., a thorough explanation of the results] or a sequential
description and explanation of each key finding.
II. Content
In general, the content of your results section should include the following:
NOTE: Use the past tense when referring to your results. Reference to findings
should always be described as having already happened because the method of
gathering data has been completed.
III. Problems to Avoid
When writing the results section, avoid doing the following:
1. Discussing or interpreting your results. Save all this for the next section of
your paper, although where appropriate, you should compare or contrast
specific results to those found in other studies [e.g., "Similar to Smith [1990],
one of the findings of this study is the strong correlation between motivation
and academic achievement...."].
2. Reporting background information or attempting to explain your
findings. This should have been done in your Introduction section, but don't
panic! Often the results of a study point to the need for additional background
information or to explain the topic further, so don't think you did something
wrong. Revise your introduction as needed.
3. Ignoring negative results. If some of your results fail to support your
hypothesis, do not ignore them. Document them, then state in your discussion
section why you believe a negative result emerged from your study. Note that
negative results, and how you handle them, offer you the opportunity to write a
more engaging discussion section, therefore, don't be afraid to highlight them.
4. Including raw data or intermediate calculations. Ask your professor if you
need to include any raw data generated by your study, such as transcripts from
interviews or data files. If raw data is to be included, place it in an appendix or
set of appendices that are referred to in the text.
5. Be as factual and concise as possible in reporting your findings. Do not
use phrases that are vague or non-specific, such as, "appeared to be greater or
lesser than..." or "demonstrates promising trends that...."
6. Presenting the same data or repeating the same information more than
once. If it is important to highlight a particular finding, you will have an
opportunity to emphasize its significance in the discussion section.
7. Confusing figures with tables. Be sure to properly label any non-textual
elements in your paper. Don't call a chart an illustration or a figure a table. If
you are not sure, go here.
This section is often considered the most important part of your research paper
because this is where you:
neral Rules
These are the general rules you should adopt when composing your discussion
of the results:
V. Problems to Avoid
Do not waste time restating your results. Should you need to remind the
reader of a finding to be discussed, use "bridge sentences" that relate the result
to the interpretation. An example would be: In the case of determining
available housing to single women with children in rural areas of Texas, the
findings suggest that access to good schools is important," then move on to
explaining this finding.
Recommendations for further research can be included in either the
discussion or conclusion of your paper, but do not repeat your
recommendations in the both sections. Think about the overall narrative flow of
your paper to determine where best to locate this information.
Do not introduce new results in the discussion section. Be wary of
mistaking the reiteration of a specific finding for an interpretation because it
may confuse the reader. The description of findings [results] and the
interpretation of their significance [discussion] should be distinct sections of
your paper. If you choose to combine the results section and the discussion
section into a single narrative, you must be clear in how you report the
information discovered and your own interpretation of each finding.
Use of the first person is generally acceptable. Using first person can help
emphasize a point or illustrate a contrasting finding. However, keep in mind that
too much use of the first person can actually distract the reader from the main
points [i.e., I know you're telling me this; just tell me!].
Why a Scientific Format?
The scientific format may seem confusing for the beginning science writer due
to its rigid structure which is so different from writing in the humanities. One
reason for using this format is that it is a means of efficiently communicating
scientific findings to the broad community of scientists in a uniform manner.
Another reason, perhaps more important than the first, is that this format
allows the paper to be read at several different levels. For example, many
people skim Titles to find out what information is available on a subject. Others
may read only titles and Abstracts. Those wanting to go deeper may look at
the Tables and Figures in the Results, and so on. The take home point here is
that the scientific format helps to insure that at whatever level a person reads
your paper (beyond title skimming), they will likely get the key results and
conclusions.
Top of page
The sections appear in a journal style paper in the following prescribed order:
What did I do in a
Abstract
nutshell?
Section Headings:
Main Section Headings: Each main section of the paper begins with a heading
which should be capitalized, centered at the beginning of the section,
and double spaced from the lines above and below. Do not underline the
section heading OR put a colon at the end.
INTRODUCTION
Subheadings: When your paper reports on more than one experiment, use
subheadings to help organize the presentation. Subheadings should
be capitalized (first letter in each word), left justified, and
either bold italics OR underlined.
Example of a subheading:
Top of page
1. Function: Your paper should begin with a Title that succinctly describes
the contents of the paper. Use descriptive words that you would associate
strongly with the content of your paper: the molecule studied, the organism
used or studied, the treatment, the location of a field site, the response
measured, etc. A majority of readers will find your paper via electronic database
searches and those search engines key on words found in the title.
2. Title FAQs
3. Format:
The title should be centered at the top of page 1 (DO NOT use a title
page - it is a waste of paper for our purposes); the title is NOT underlined
or italicized.
the authors' names (PI or primary author first) and institutional
affiliation are double-spaced from and centered below the title. When
more then two authors, the names are separated by commas except for
the last which is separated from the previous name by the word "and".
For example:
Top of page
The title is not a section, but it is necessary and important. The title should be
short and unambiguous, yet be an adequate description of the work. A general
rule-of-thumb is that the title should contain the key words describing the
work presented. Remember that the title becomes the basis for most on-line
computer searches - if your title is insufficient, few people will find or read your
paper. For example, in a paper reporting on an experiment involving dosing
mice with the sex hormone estrogen and watching for a certain kind of
courtship behavior, a poor title would be:
Mouse Behavior
Why? Because the key words identify a specific behavior, a modifying agent,
and the experimental organism. If possible, give the key result of the study in
the title, as seen in the first example. Similarly, the above title could be restated
as:
Top of page
ABSTRACT
Whereas the Title can only make the simplest statement about the content of
your article, the Abstract allows you to elaborate more on each major aspect of
the paper. The length of your Abstract should be kept to about 200-300 words
maximum (a typical standard length for journals.) Limit your statements
concerning each segment of the paper (i.e. purpose, methods, results, etc.) to
two or three sentences, if possible. The Abstract helps readers decide whether
they want to read the rest of the paper, or it may be the only part they can
obtain via electronic literature searches or in published abstracts. Therefore,
enough key information (e.g., summary results, observations, trends, etc.) must
be included to make the Abstract useful to someone who may to reference your
work.
Top of page
How do you know when you have enough information in your Abstract? A
simple rule-of-thumb is to imagine that you are another researcher doing an
study similar to the one you are reporting. If your Abstract was the only part of
the paper you could access, would you be happy with the information
presented there?
2. Style: The Abstract is ONLY text. Use the active voice when possible, but
much of it may require passive constructions. Write your Abstract using
concise, but complete, sentences, and get to the point quickly. Use past tense.
Maximum length should be 200-300 words, usually in a single paragraph.
Top of page
Top of page
INTRODUCTION
[ strategy | FAQs | style | structure | relevant literature review | statement of purpose | rationale ]
Quite literally, the Introduction must answer the questions, "What was I
studying? Why was it an important question? What did we know about it before I
did this study? How will this study advance our knowledge?"
2. Style: Use the active voice as much as possible. Some use of first person is
okay, but do not overdo it.
Top of page
Top of page
Top of page
What literature should you look for in your review of what we know
about the problem? Focus your efforts on the primary research journals -
the journals that publish original research articles. Although you may
read some general background references (encyclopedias, textbooks, lab
manuals, style manuals, etc.) to get yourself acquainted with the subject
area, do not cite these, becasue they contain information that is
considered fundamental or "common" knowledge wqithin the discipline.
Cite, instead, articles that reported specific results relevant to your study.
Learn, as soon as possible, how to find the primary literature (research
journals) and review articles rather than depending on reference books.
The articles listed in the Literature Cited of relevant papers you find are a
good starting point to move backwards in a line of inquiry. Most
academic libraries support the Citation Index - an index which is useful
for tracking a line of inquiry forward in time. Some of the newer search
engines will actually send you alerts of new papers that cite particular
articles of interest to you. Review articles are particularly useful because
they summarize all the research done on a narrow subject area over a
brief period of time (a year to a few years in most cases).
Top of page
Be sure to clearly state the purpose and /or hypothesis that you
investigated. When you are first learning to write in this format it is
okay, and actually preferable, to use a pat statement like, "The purpose
of this study was to...." or "We investigated three possible mechanisms
to explain the ... (1) blah, blah..(2) etc. It is most usual to place the
statement of purpose near the end of the Introduction, often as the topic
sentence of the final paragraph. It is not necessary (or even desirable) to
use the words "hypothesis" or "null hypothesis", since these are usually
implicit if you clearly state your purpose and expectations.
Top of page
Top of Page
1. Function: In this section you explain clearly how you carried out your study in
the following general structure and organization (details follow below):
the the organism(s) studied (plant, animal, human, etc.) and, when
relevant, their pre-experiment handling and care, and when and where
the study was carried out (only if location and time are important
factors); note that the term "subject" is used ONLY for human studies.
if you did a field study, provide a description of the study site, including
the significant physical and biological features, and the precise location
(latitude and longitude, map, etc);
the experimental OR sampling design (i.e., how the experiment or
study was structured. For example, controls, treatments, what variable(s)
were measured, how many samples were collected, replication, the final
form of the data, etc.);
the protocol for collecting data, i.e., how the experimental procedures
were carried out, and,
how the data were analyzed (qualitative analyses and/or statistical
procedures used to determine significance, data transformations used,
what probability was used to decide significance, etc).
Organize your presentation so your reader will understand the logical flow of
the experiment(s); subheadings work well for this purpose. Each experiment or
procedure should be presented as a unit, even if it was broken up over time. The
experimental design and procedure are sometimes most efficiently presented
as an integrated unit, because otherwise it would be difficult to split them up. In
general, provide enough quantitative detail (how much, how long, when, etc.)
about your experimental protocol such that other scientists could reproduce
your experiments. You should also indicate the statistical procedures used to
analyze your results, including the probability level at which you determined
significance (usually at 0.05 probability).
2. Style: The style in this section should read as if you were verbally describing
the conduct of the experiment. You may use the active voice to a certain
extent, although this section requires more use of third person, passive
constructions than others. Avoid use of the first person in this section.
Remember to use the past tense throughout - the work being reported is done,
and was performed in the past, not the future. The Methods section is not a
step-by-step, directive, protocol as you might see in your lab manual.
4. Methods FAQs.
Top of Page
Describe the organism(s) used in the study. This includes giving the
(1) source (supplier or where and how the orgranisms were collected),
(2) typical size (weight, length, etc), (3) how they were handled, fed, and
housed before the experiment, (4) how they were handled, fed, and
housed during the experiment. In genetics studies include the strains or genetic
stocks used. For some studies, age may be an important factor. For example,
did you use mouse pups or adults? Seedlings or mature plants?
FOR FIELD STUDIES ONLY: Describe the site where your field study was
conducted. The description must include
both physical and biological characteristics of the site pertinant to the study
aims. Include the date(s) of the study (e.g., 10-15 April 1994) and the exact
location of the study area. Location data must be as precise as possible: "Grover
Nature Preserve, mi SW Grover, Maine" rather than "Grover Nature
Preserve" or "Grover". When possible, give the actual latitude and longitude
position of the site: these can be obtained using handheld GPS units, OR, from
web resources such as Google Earth(TM) and MapQuest(TM). It is often a good
idea to include a map (labeled as a Figure) showing the study location in
relation to some larger more recognizable geographic area. Someone else
should be able to go to the exact location of your study site if they want to
repeat or check your work, or just visit your study area.
NOTE: For laboratory studies you need not report the date and
location of the study UNLESS it is necessary information for someone
to have who might wish to repeat your work or use the same facility.
Most often it is not. If you have performed experiments at a particular
location or lab because it is the only place to do it, or one of a few,
then you should note that in your methods and identify the lab or
facility.
Top of Page
Describe the procedures for your study in sufficient detail that other
scientists could repeat your work to verify your findings. Foremost in your
description should be the "quantitative" aspects of your study - the masses,
volumes, incubation times, concentrations, etc., that another scientist needs in
order to duplicate your experiment. When using standard lab or field methods
and instrumentation, it is not always necessary to explain the procedures (e.g.,
serial dilution) or equipment used (e.g., autopipetter) since other scientists will
likely be familiar with them already.
You may want to identify certain types of equipment by vendor name and
brand or category (e.g., ultracentrifuge vs. prep centrifuge), particularly if they
are not commonly found in most labs. It is appropriate to report,
parenthetically, the source (vendor) and catalog number for reagents used,
e.g., "....poly-L-lysine (Sigma #1309)." When using a method described in
another published source, you can save time and words by providing
the relevant citation to the source. Always make sure to describe any
modifications you have made of a standard or published method.
Describe how the data were summarized and analyzed. Here you will
indicate what types of descriptive statistics were used and which analyses
(usually hypothesis tests) were employed to answer each of the questions or
hypotheses tested and determine statistical siginifcance.
"A Paired t-test was used to compare mean flight duration before and after
applying stablizers to the glider's wings."
"One way ANOVA was used to compare mean weight gain in weight-matched
calves fed the three different rations."
"Comparisons among the three pH treatment groups for each variable were done
using one way ANOVA (with Tukey's post hoc test) or a Kruskal-Wallis Test (with
Dunn's post hoc test)."
Top of Page
"The petri dish was placed on the turntable. The lid was then raised slightly. An
inoculating loop was used to transfer culture to the agar surface. The turntable
was rotated 90 degrees by hand. The loop was moved lightly back and forth over
the agar to spread the culture. The bacteria were then incubated at 37 C for 24 hr."
Improved Example: Same actions, but all the important information is given in
a single, concise sentence. Note that superfluous detail and otherwise obvious
information has been deleted while important missing information was added.
"Each plate was placed on a turntable and streaked at opposing angles with fresh
overnight E. coli culture using an inoculating loop. The bacteria were then
incubated at 37 C for 24 hr."
Best: Here the author assumes the reader has basic knowledge of
microbiological techniques and has deleted other superfluous information. The
two sentences have been combined because they are related actions.
"Each plate was streaked with fresh overnight E. coli culture and incubated at 37 C
for 24 hr."
Top of Page
Problem: Avoid using ambiguous terms to identify controls or
treatments, or other study parameters that require specific identifiers to
be clearly understood. Designators such as Tube 1, Tube 2, or Site 1 and
Site 2 are completely meaningless out of context and difficult to follow in
context.
Problematic example: In this example the reader will have no clue as to what
the various tubes represent without having to constantly refer back to some
previous point in the Methods.
"A Spec 20 was used to measure A600 of Tubes 1,2, and 3 immediately after
chloroplasts were added (Time 0) and every 2 min. thereafter until the DCIP was
completely reduced. Tube 4's A600 was measured only at Time 0 and at the end of
the experiment."
Improved example: Notice how the substitution (in red) of treatment and
control identifiers clarifies the passage both in the context of the paper, and if
taken out of context.
"A Spec 20 was used to measure A600 of the reaction mixtures exposed to light
intensities of 1500, 750, and 350 uE/m2/sec immediately after chloroplasts were
added (Time 0) and every 2 min. thereafter until the DCIP was completely
reduced. The A600 of the no-light control was measured only at Time 0 and at the
end of the experiment."
Top of Page
RESULTS
2. Style: Write the text of the Results section concisely and objectively. The
passive voice will likely dominate here, but use the active voice as much as
possible. Use the past tense. Avoid repetitive paragraph structures. Do not
interpret the data here. The transition into interpretive language can be a
slippery slope. Consider the following two examples:
This example highlights the trend/difference that the author wants the
reader to focus:
The results of the germination experiment (Fig. 2) suggest that the optimal
time for running-water treatment is 2 days. This group showed the highest
cumulative germination (84%), with longer (5 d) or shorter (12 h) exposures
producing smaller gains in germination when compared to the control group.
Top of Page
What are the "results"?: When you pose a testable hypothesis that can be
answered experimentally, or ask a question that can be answered by collecting
samples, you accumulate observations about those organisms or phenomena.
Those observations are then analyzed to yield an answer to the question. In
general, the answer is the " key result".
The above statements apply regardless of the complexity of the analysis you
employ. So, in an introductory course your analysis may consist of visual
inspection of figures and simple calculations of means and standard deviations;
in a later course you may be expected to apply and interpret a variety of
statistical tests. You instructor will tell you the level of analysis that is expected.
For example, suppose you asked the question, "Is the average height of male
students the same as female students in a pool of randomly selected Biology
majors?" You would first collect height data from large random samples of male
and female students. You would then calculate the descriptive statistics for
those samples (mean, SD, n, range, etc) and plot these numbers. In a course
where statistical tests are not employed, you would visually inspect these plots.
Suppose you found that male Biology majors are, on average, 12.5 cm taller
than female majors; this is the answer to the question.
Notice that the outcome of a statistical analysis is not a key result, but
rather an analytical tool that helps us understand what is our key result.
Top of Page
Organize the results section based on the sequence of Table and Figures
you'll include. Prepare the Tables and Figures as soon as all the data are
analyzed and arrange them in the sequence that best presents your findings in
a logical way. A good strategy is to note, on a draft of each Table or Figure, the
one or two key results you want to addess in the text portion of the Results.
Simple rules to follow related to Tables and Figures:
Tables and Figures are assigned numbers separately and in the sequence
that you will refer to them from the text.
o The first Table you refer to is Table 1, the next Table 2 and so
forth.
o Similarly, the first Figure is Figure 1, the next Figure 2, etc.
Each Table or Figure must include a brief description of the results being
presented and other necessary information in a legend.
o Table legends go above the Table; tables are read from top to
bottom.
o Figure legends go below the figure; figures are usually viewed
from bottom to top.
Top of Page
Top of Page
"Males (180.5 5.1 cm; n=34) averaged 12.5 cm taller than females (168 7.6
cm; n=34) in the AY 1995 pool of Biology majors (two-sample t-test, t = 5.78, 33
d.f., p < 0.001)."
If the summary statistics are shown in a figure, the sentence above need not
report them specifically, but must include a reference to the figure where they
may be seen:
"Males averaged 12.5 cm taller than females in the AY 1995 pool of Biology
majors(two-sample t-test, t = 5.78, 33 d.f., p < 0.001; Fig. 1)."
Note that the report of the key result (shown in blue) would be identical in a
paper written for a course in which statistical testing is not employed - the
section shown in red would simply not appear except reference to the figure.
Top of Page
Report negative results - they are important! If you did not get the
anticipated results, it may mean your hypothesis was incorrect and needs to be
reformulated, or perhaps you have stumbled onto something unexpected that
warrants further study. Moreover, the absence of an effect may be very telling
in many situations. In any case, your results may be of importance to others
even though they did not support your hypothesis. Do not fall into the trap of
thinking that results contrary to what you expected are necessarily "bad data".
If you carried out the work well, they are simply your results and need
interpretation. Many important discoveries can be traced to "bad data".
for an individual value you would write, "the mean length was 10 m", or,
"the maximum time was 140 min."
When including a measure of variability, place the unit after the error
value, e.g., "...was 10 2.3 m".
Likewise place the unit after the last in a series of numbers all having the
same unit. For example: "lengths of 5, 10, 15, and 20 m", or "no
differences were observed after 2, 4, 6, or 8 min. of incubation".
Top of Page
DISCUSSION
| strategy | FAQs | style | approach | use of literature | results in discussion |
2. Style: Use the active voice whenever possible in this section. Watch out for
wordy phrases; be concise and make your points clearly. Use of the first person
is okay, but too much use of the first person may actually distract the reader
from the main points.
You will necessarily make reference to the findings of others in order to support
your interpretations.Use subheadings, if need be, to help organize your
presentation. Be wary of mistaking the reiteration of a result for an
interpretation, and make sure that no new resultsare presented here that
rightly belong in the results.
You must relate your work to the findings of other studies - including
previous studies you may have done and those of other investigators. As
stated previously, you may find crucial information in someone else's study that
helps you interpret your own data, or perhaps you will be able to reinterpret
others' findings in light of yours. In either case you should discuss reasons for
similarities and differences between yours and others' findings. Consider how
the results of other studies may be combined with yours to derive a new or
perhaps better substantiated understanding of the problem. Be sure to state
the conclusions that can be drawn from your results in light of these
considerations. You may also choose to briefly mention further studies you
would do to clarify your working hypotheses. Make sure to reference any
outside sources as shown in the Introduction section.
Top of Page
If, in your experiment, you received any significant help in thinking up,
designing, or carrying out the work, or received materials from someone who
did you a favor by supplying them, you must acknowledge their assistance and
the service or material provided. Authors alwaysacknowledge outside
reviewers of their drafts (in PI courses, this would be done only if an instructor
or other individual critiqued the draft prior to evaluation) and any sources of
funding that supported the research. Although usual style requirements (e.g.,
1st person, objectivity) are relaxed somewhat here, Acknowledgments are
always brief and never flowery.
LITERATURE CITED
1. Function: The Literature Cited section gives an alphabetical listing (by first
author's last name) of the references that you actually cited in the body of your
paper. Instructions for writing full citations for various sources are given in on
separate page. A complete format list for virtually all types of publication may
be found in Huth and others(1994).
Top of Page
APPENDICES
| FAQs | Function | Headings | Types of Content | Tables and Figures
raw data
maps (foldout type especially)
extra photographs
explanation of formulas, either already known ones, or especially if you
have "invented" some statistical or other mathematical procedures for
data analysis.
specialized computer programs for a particular procedure
full generic names of chemicals or compounds that you have referred to
in somewhat abbreviated fashion or by some common name in the text
of your paper.
diagrams of specialized apparati.
Figures and Tables are often found in an appendix. These should be formatted
as discussed previously (see Tables and Figures), but are numbered in a
separate sequence from those found in the body of the paper. So, the first
Figure in the appendix would be Figure 1, the first Table would be Table 1, and
so forth. In situations when multiple appendices are used, the Table and Figure
numbering must indicate the appendix number as well (see Huth and others,
1994).
Abstract
There are little facts about the role of obedience when doing evil actions up until now (1961).
Most theories suggest that only very disturbed people do horrible actions if they are ordered to
do so. Our experiment tested people's obedience to authority. The results showed that most
obey all orders given by the authority-figure. The conclusion is that when it comes to people
harming others, the situation a person's in is more important than previously thought. In
contrary to earlier belief, individual characteristics are less important.
[Page 3-X - text starts in the top, left corner, no extra spacing to align text]
Introduction
Current theories focus on personal characteristics to explain wrong-doing and how someone
can intentionally harm others. In a survey, professionals such as doctors, psychologist and
laymen thought that very few out of a population (1-3%) would harm others if ordered to do so.
In the recent war trial with Adolph Eichmann, he claims to "only have been following orders".
The author wanted to test whether this is true, or just a cheap explanation. Can people harm
others because they obey the orders? Are good-hearted people able to do this?
The experiment will test whether a person can keep giving electric shocks to another person
just because they are told to do so. The expectation is that very few will keep giving shocks,
and that most persons will disobey the order.
Methods
Participants
There were male 30 participants participating. They were recruited by advertisement in a
newspaper and were paid $4.50.
Instruments
A "shock generator" was used to trick the participants into thinking that they gave shock to
another person in another room. The shock generator had switches labeled with different
voltages, starting at 30 volts and increasing in 15-volt increments all the way up to 450 volts.
The switches were also labeled with terms which reminded the participant of how dangerous
the shocks were.
Procedures
The participant met another "participant" in the waiting room before the experiment. The other
"participant" was an actor. Each participant got the role as a "teacher" who would then deliver a
shock to the actor ("learner") every time an incorrect answer was produced. The participant
believed that he was delivering real shocks to the learner.
The learner was a confederate who would pretend to be shocked. As the experiment
progressed, the teacher would hear the learner plead to be released and complain about a
heart condition. Once the 300-volt level had been reached, the learner banged on the wall and
demanded to be released. Beyond this point, the learner became completely silent and refused
to answer any more questions. The experimenter then instructed the participant to treat this
silence as an incorrect response and deliver a further shock.
When asking the experimenter if they should stop, they were instructed to continue.
Results
Of the 40 participants in the study, 26 delivered the maximum shocks. 14 persons did not obey
the experimenter and stopped before reaching the highest levels. All 40 participants continued
to give shocks up to 300 volts.
Discussion/Conclusion
Most of the participants became very agitated, stressed and angry at the experimenter. Many
continued to follow orders all the time even though they were clearly uncomfortable. The study
shows that people are able to harm others intentionally if ordered to do so. It shows that the
situation is far more important than previously believed, and that personal characteristics are
less important in such a situation.