Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How unlikely was the presidential election victory for Donald Trump? With Hillary
Clinton favored at -300, its safe to say most people did not see it coming. What was more than
1,000 times (literally) less likely to happen than a Trump presidency? A victory for the so called
Brexit campaign in the United Kingdom. Anyone who wants to read about one of these
unique, once in a lifetime political events have more choices on the internet available to
them than a soccer mom buying groceriesyet the underlying theme and rhetoric of these
movements have been left unconnected to the larger scheme of things in the mainstream. I
believe the political uprisings in developed democracies are connected and could potentially be
It was early spring, and a presidential hopeful stood in front of the cameras citing a
failure of leadership in Washington to drive him to run for President of the United States. This
candidate was thought by most to be a longshot, guaranteed to not make it out his partys
primary process. He was unconventional, unexperienced, but many say hes a very charismatic
speaker and despite his unconventional ideas; were drawn to him. Which candidate am I
speaking of? Why President Obama of course. In a weird way, President Obama lead the way
for future ideological movements and candidates similar to what has now been popularized by
President Trump. There are other parallels that can be made, (such as their fundraising tactics
to go outside their party system) but whats important is that right wing populism as we know it
right now started on the backs of a democratic outsider chanting: yes we can in 2007.
Fast forward a couple years. America has now elected its first black presidentand
many people arent a fan of his politics. Ratings for the talking heads like Sean Hannity, Glenn
Beck, and Rush Limbaugh are skyrocketing. These and others are gaining popularity by giving
daily diatribes on how the government is broken, the media is fake, and dealing out conspiracy
theories as fact (like say, the birther movement). Their voices would ultimately give way to a
new political movement on the right-wing: the Tea Party. In the 2010 midterm elections in the
United States; the Tea Party dominates and not only do they win back the House but they
Across the pond in Europe, an interesting shift is taking place. Mainstream parties are at
historically weak points they havent seen since the world wars. Insurgent policies are popping
up in The Netherlands, in France, and UK most notably. All of these parties have a leader who is
seen to be a charismatic politician on the rise. The mainstream incidentally aids the growth of
these parties across Europe as they begin to adopt watered-down versions of their rhetoric and
policies. A growing sense of legitimacy for these political outsiders and insurgents allows them
Now; the stage is set. Donald Trump, Marine le Pen, Nigel Farage, and Geert Wilders are
now front and center on the world stage and there are other candidates in several parties
starting to capitalize on the perceived populist rage of social and economic changes to western
society. A lot of these changes seem to be benefitting certain people enormously, while leaving
aspect of proving people wrong is more than a talking point for media coverage. There is a
common demographic across these countries that are receptive to this message being: working
class white. While cultures undoubtedly have many subtle and not so subtle differences, the
psychological makeup of a type of a person (in this case working class white) is always going to
have some similarities because of the environmental resemblance. This type of person (the
common person), is more likely to sub consciously or consciously gravitate towards the
David archetype from David and Goliath. Proving the elite, know-it-all, pundits wrong feeds
into that narrative. Whether knowingly or on purpose, the little guy standing up to
bureaucrats was a big part of the exploited rhetoric for these political movements. Across
national boundaries, the first shared theme can be identified as the underdog complex.
The next dot to connect between these movements is strongly shared bit of rhetoric:
getting control of the borders/tighter immigration. All of these political movements have made
it a point to bring immigration (or rather the lack of it) to the forefront. This brings in a lot of
calculated risk as it is shown to strike a strong accord with the target base. In fact, research
done with focus groups by the Leave campaign in the UK showed that aversion to immigration
was their strongest weapon. This is one of the more dangerous messages from these political
movements. Geert Wilders the leader of the PVV in The Netherlands once said the Koran was a
fascist book while also calling Islam a totalitarian religion. Marine Le Pen once stated: I am
opposed to a multi-cultural France. The former Prime minister of Australia Tony Abbott said:
Jesus knew there was a place for everyone, and its not everyones place to be in Australia.
Boris Johnson one of the leaders of the Brexit campaign once said: Orientals have larger
brains and higher IQ scores. Blacks are at the other pole. President Trump said on the
campaign trail: The more economic difficulties increase; the more immigration will be seen as
a burden. Okay, actually I lied about that last one he didnt say that. However, that is a real
quote from a leader admonishing immigration, actually Adolf Hitler was the one who said that. I
know its super lame and disingenuous how people always compare politicians they dont like
to Hitler but all Im saying is there was a moment where you totally believed me and that
should count for a little something. History has shown that nativist, anti-immigration rhetoric
leads to tragic things and it has been said that those who do not know history are doomed to
repeat it.
The next similarity isnt as glaring, yet speaks to a pattern among these movements
nonetheless. The basis of right wing populism in the UK was built on leaving the EU, and a
constant bullet point Trump hit on in his campaign stump was to leave NAFTA. While leaders
like Le Pen and Wilders may not have had the same opportunity to leave the EU like in the UK,
it is certainly no secret where they stand. Marine Le Pen going as far to say that the British
people should be proud everyday for the referendum result. While this detail might not seem
as significant as say immigration, it speaks volumes in terms of learning about the rhetorical
pattern established. Its not about substance, but the feeling of these moves. When President
Trump backed out of the Paris climate agreement, it was to make a point--he wanted to put
America first no matter the perceived cost. Abandoning these things drives home the point that
bureaucrats and their fancy policies are bad, and that the people who set up these systems
Nationalism was a contributing factor that cant be ignored within these political
movements. To make ones country great again, returning to better times was no doubt a
sentiment pushed by many campaign leaders. This is an overlooked element by a lot of people
because, so what of course politicians from different countries think their country has a right to
be recognized as the best, whats wrong with that? I must again return to the pages of history
because, what else can we use to predict the future other than the past? History is clear;
nationalism is dangerous. Nationalism leads to genocide and racism and conflict and war.
Nationalism leads to Bosnia. Nationalism leads to World War I. I know its hyperbole to say
were on the brink of World War, but lets take a brief look. Before World War I countries across
Europe were taken over by propaganda from small, insurgent political parties that lead
governments to believe other countries in Europe werent as good. America was experiencing a
sudden wave of immigration that made it difficult for a lot of people to find workand many
people resented this fact blaming Jews, Irish, Italian, Polish, for a lack of work. Im not saying
Im just saying.
Now, to focus in more on Donald Trumps campaign for presidency, and the Leave
you willand their use on the campaign trail. A popular line from the Leave campthat was
even plastered to a buswas that Britain was sending 350 million pounds a week to Brussels it
could be spending on national health care. However, this number was widely criticized as
Britain gets back a substantial sum from the EU every week. Also, the difference in the money is
worth it because without being a part of the EU, Britain would have to establish its own
individual trade deals with each of its European neighbors which would end up being more
expensive. As John Oliverhost of HBOs Last Week Tonight--put it the bus should have read:
We actually send the EU a proportion of our GDP which makes fiscal sense. In fact, considering
the benefits we reap in return oh shit, were running out of bus! Okay bye! The Trump
campaigns affinity for twisting the facts was fairly well documented as well. To name a couple,
stating that the Mexican government wanted criminals to cross the border, the US corporate
tax rate is the highest in the world, and Poltifacts lie of the year: Muslims in New Jersey were
cheering when the Twin Towers fell on 9/11. Why were these and other lies deemed okay by
supporters? Statistical analysis shows Trump did amazing among voters whos education was
no higher than a high school diploma. Supporters of Trump overwhelmingly sighted emotion
over logic as to explain why they voted for him. Obviously, part of the appeal of Donald Trump,
Nigel Farage, or Boris Johnson wasnt that they were wordsmiths, but rather unafraid to speak
their mind and reject the politically correct mainstream. These politicians were popular
among voters who had a disconnect with the elites who were spewing the data, so it became
all too easy to simply go along with Trump, Farage, and Johnson in blissful ignorance or willing
denial.
A new era of politics has been ushered into developed democracies around the world,
and we are all in uncharted waters. This could be dangerous if we do not seek to understand
and question what has been presented to us in recent history. Lets make our world great
again.
(Im not actually going to end here or like this/but Ive hit a wall and I want to sleep).