𝑹𝜷

𝑹𝜶
 𝑷𝒛

𝑹𝜷
𝑹𝜶
𝒖𝜷𝟎 𝒛. 𝒖𝜷𝟏

𝝏𝒖𝒛𝟎
𝝏𝜷
𝝏𝒖𝒛𝟎
𝝏𝜷
 𝒖𝜷𝟎
𝒖𝒛𝟎

𝝏𝒖𝒛𝟎
𝝏𝜷
𝛼, 𝛽
𝛼, 𝛽
𝑢(𝛼, 𝛽, 𝑧) = 𝐹𝑠 (𝑧) 𝑢𝑠 (𝛼, 𝛽)
3D = 1D + 2D

𝑢𝛼 = 𝑢𝛼0 + 𝑧𝑢𝛼1 + 𝑧 2 𝑢𝛼2 + 𝑧 3 𝑢𝛼3 + 𝑧 4 𝑢𝛼4

𝑢𝛽 = 𝑢𝛽0 + 𝑧𝑢𝛽1 + 𝑧 2 𝑢𝛽2 + 𝑧 3 𝑢𝛽3 + 𝑧 4 𝑢𝛽4

𝑢𝑧 = 𝑢𝑧0 + 𝑧𝑢𝑧1 + 𝑧 2 𝑢𝑧2 + 𝑧 3 𝑢𝑧3 + 𝑧 4 𝑢𝑧4

 2 3 4 𝑘 𝜋𝑧
𝑢 = 𝑢0 + 𝑧𝑢1 + 𝑧 𝑢2 + 𝑧 𝑢3 + 𝑧 𝑢4 + (−1) 𝜁𝑘 𝑢5 + sin( ) 𝑢6 +
ℎ
2𝜋𝑧 3𝜋𝑧 4𝜋𝑧 𝜋𝑧 2𝜋𝑧
sin( ) 𝑢7 + sin( ) 𝑢8 + sin( ) 𝑢9 + cos( ) 𝑢10 + cos( ) 𝑢11 +
ℎ ℎ ℎ ℎ ℎ
𝑧 2𝑧 3𝑧 4𝑧
3𝜋𝑧 4𝜋𝑧
cos( ) 𝑢12 + cos( ) 𝑢13 + 𝑒 𝑢14 + 𝑒 𝑢15 + 𝑒 𝑢16 + 𝑒 𝑢17
ℎ ℎ ℎ ℎ
ℎ ℎ

𝑢𝛼 = 𝑢𝛼0 + 𝑧𝑢𝛼1 + 𝑧 2 𝑢𝛼2 + 𝑧 3 𝑢𝛼3 + (−1)𝑘 𝜁𝑘 𝑢𝛼5

𝑢𝛽 = 𝑢𝛽0 + 𝑧𝑢𝛽1 + 𝑧 3 𝑢𝛽3

𝑢𝛼 = 𝑢𝛼0 + 𝑧𝑢𝛼1 + 𝑧 2 𝑢𝛼2 + 𝑧 4 𝑢𝛼4

 𝑘
𝑘
𝑢 = 𝐹𝑠 𝑢𝑠𝑘 = 𝐹𝑡 𝑢𝑡𝑘 + 𝐹𝑏 𝑢𝑏 + 𝐹𝑟 𝑢𝑟𝑘

𝜕𝑢𝑧0 (𝛼, 𝛽)
𝑢𝛼 = 𝑢𝛼0 (𝛼, 𝛽 ) − 𝑧
𝜕𝛼
𝜕𝑢𝑧0 (𝛼, 𝛽)
𝑢𝛽 = 𝑣𝛽0 (𝛼, 𝛽 ) − 𝑧
𝜕𝛽
𝑢𝑧 = 𝑢𝑧0 (𝛼, 𝛽)
𝜀𝛼𝑧 = 0

𝜀𝛽𝑧 = 0

𝜀𝑧𝑧 = 0
𝑢𝛼 = 𝑢𝛼0 (𝛼, 𝛽) + 𝑧𝑢𝛼1 (𝛼, 𝛽)

𝑢𝛽 = 𝑢𝛽0 (𝛼, 𝛽) + 𝑧𝑢𝛽1 (𝛼, 𝛽)

𝑢𝑧 = 𝑢𝑧0 (𝛼, 𝛽)
𝛼
 𝜕𝑢𝑧𝑜
−𝑧
𝜕𝛼

𝛼 𝛼

𝛼
 𝑢𝛼4

𝑢𝛼3

𝑢𝛼2

𝑢𝛼1

𝑢𝛼0
 2(𝑧−𝑧0𝑘 )
𝜍𝑘 = , 𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒: − 1 ≤ 𝜍𝑘 ≤ 1
ℎ𝑘

𝜍𝑘 = 1: 𝐹𝑡 = 1, 𝐹𝑏 = 0, 𝐹𝑟 = 0

𝜍𝑘 = −1: 𝐹𝑡 = 0, 𝐹𝑏 = 1, 𝐹𝑟 = 0
𝛼, 𝛽
 𝑢 = 𝑢0 + 𝑧𝑢1 + 𝑧 2 𝑢2 + 𝑧 3 𝑢3 + 𝑧 4 𝑢4 + (−1)𝑘 𝜍𝑘 𝑢5

Teoría Asintótica:
Evalúa la Se obtiene la
efectividad de las mejor teoría.
variables
 (−1)𝑘 𝜁𝑘
𝜋𝑧 𝜋𝑧 𝑁𝑧
Model Disp. sin(𝑁 ) cos(𝑁 ) 𝑒 ℎ
𝑧𝑁 ℎ ℎ
o
0 1 2 3 4 -- 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
𝑢𝛼  -  - - - - - - - - - - - -
12
𝑢𝛽  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
HRM
𝑢𝑧  -  - - - - - - - - - - - - -

𝑢𝛼 = 𝑢𝛼0 + 𝑧𝑢𝛼1 + 𝑧 2 𝑢𝛼2 + 𝑧 3 𝑢𝛼3 + (−1)𝑘 𝜁𝑘 𝑢𝛼5

𝑢𝛽 = 𝑢𝛽0 + 𝑧𝑢𝛽1 + 𝑧 3 𝑢𝛽3

𝑢𝛼 = 𝑢𝛼0 + 𝑧𝑢𝛼1 + 𝑧 2 𝑢𝛼2 + 𝑧 4 𝑢𝛼4

 Termino
Activo 
Termino
Inactivo 

Termino Termino
activo no activo
 -
 𝜋𝑧 𝜋𝑧 𝑁𝑧
𝑧𝑁 (−1)𝑘 𝜁𝑘 sin(𝑁 ) cos(𝑁 ) 𝑒ℎ
Modelo Disp. ℎ ℎ
0 1 2 3 4 -- 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
𝑢𝛼 -  - - - - - - - - - - - -
12
𝑢𝛽 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
HRM
𝑢𝑧 -  - - - - - - - - - - - - -
𝑢𝛼 -  - - - - - - - - - - -
15
𝑢𝛽 - -  - - - - - - - - - - -
HRM
𝑢𝑧 -  - - - - - - - - - - - - -
𝑢𝛼 - -  - - - - - - - - - -
16
𝑢𝛽 - - -  - - - - - - - - -
HRM
𝑢𝑧 - - -  - - - - - - - - - - -
𝑢𝛼 -  - - - - - - - - - -
18
𝑢𝛽 - -  - - - - - - - - - -
HRM
𝑢𝑧 -  - - - - - - - - - - - -
𝑢𝛼 - - -  - - - - - - - - -
20
𝑢𝛽 - - -  - - - - - - - -
HRM
𝑢𝑧 - -   - - - - - - - - - -
𝑢𝛼 -  - - - - - - - - - -
21
𝑢𝛽 - -  - - - - - - - -
HRM
𝑢𝑧 -  - - - - - - - - - - -
𝑢(𝛼, 𝛽, 𝑧) = 𝐹𝑠 (𝑧) 𝑢𝑠 (𝛼, 𝛽)
𝛿𝑢 (𝛼, 𝛽, 𝑧) = 𝐹𝜏 (𝑧) 𝛿𝑢𝜏 (𝛼, 𝛽)

𝜕 𝑢𝑖 1 𝜕𝑆𝑖 2 𝑢𝑘
𝜀𝑖 = ( )+ 2 ∑ , 𝑖 = 𝛼, 𝛽, 𝑧
𝜕𝑖 𝑆𝑖 2𝑆𝑖 𝜕𝑘 𝑆𝑘
𝑘=𝑖

1 2 𝜕 𝑢𝑖 2 𝜕 𝑢𝑗
𝜀𝑖𝑗 = (𝑆𝑖 ( ) + 𝑆𝑗 ( )) 𝑖 = 𝛼, 𝛽, 𝑧; 𝑗 ≠ 𝑖
𝑆𝑖 𝑆𝑗 𝜕𝑗 𝑆𝑖 𝜕𝑖 𝑆𝑗
 𝜎 𝑘 = 𝐶𝑖𝑗𝑘 𝜀 𝑘
𝑘 𝑘
𝜎𝛼𝛼 𝑘 𝐶𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝐶𝑘 𝑘
𝐶11 12 𝐶16 𝐶14 15 𝐶13 𝛼𝛼 𝜀
𝑘 𝑘
𝜎𝛽𝛽 𝑘 𝐶𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘
𝐶12 22 𝐶26 𝐶24 𝐶25 𝐶23 𝛽𝛽 𝜀
𝑘 𝑘
𝜎𝛼𝛽 𝑘
𝐶16 𝐶26 𝑘 𝐶66
𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘
𝐶34 𝐶35 𝐶36 𝜀𝛼𝛽
𝑘
= 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘
𝜎𝛼𝑧 𝐶14 𝐶24 𝐶34 𝐶44 𝐶45 𝐶46 𝜀𝛼𝑧
𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘
𝜎𝛽𝑧 𝐶15 𝐶25 𝐶35 𝐶45 𝐶55 𝐶56 𝜀𝛽𝑧
𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘
𝑘
[ 𝜎𝑧𝑧 ] [𝐶13 𝐶23 𝐶36 𝐶46 𝐶56 𝐶33 ] [ 𝜀𝑧𝑧
𝑘
]
 𝛿𝐿𝑖𝑛𝑡 = 𝛿𝐿𝑒𝑥𝑡
𝑁𝑙 𝑁𝑙
𝑇
∑ ∫ ∫ {𝛿𝜀 𝑘 𝜎 𝑘 } 𝐻𝛼 𝑘 𝐻𝛽 𝑘 dΩ𝑘 d𝑧 = ∑ ∫ ∫{𝛿𝑢𝑘 𝑝𝑘 }𝐻𝛼 𝑘 𝐻𝛽 𝑘 dΩ𝑘 d𝑧
𝑘=1 Ω𝑘 𝐴𝑘 𝑘=1 Ω𝑘 𝐴𝑘
 𝑘𝜏𝑠 𝑘 𝑘
𝐾𝑢𝑢 𝑢𝑠 = 𝑃𝜏
 Nucleo fundamental

𝑘𝜏𝑠 𝑘𝜏𝑠 𝑘𝜏𝑠

𝐾𝑢𝑢11 𝐾𝑢𝑢12 𝐾𝑢𝑢13 𝑢𝛼 (𝛼, 𝛽) 0
𝑘𝜏𝑠
[𝐾𝑢𝑢21 𝑘𝜏𝑠 𝑘𝜏𝑠 ] [𝑢 (𝛼, 𝛽 )] = [ 0 ]
𝐾𝑢𝑢22 𝐾𝑢𝑢23 𝛽
𝑘𝜏𝑠
𝐾𝑢𝑢31 𝑘𝜏𝑠
𝐾𝑢𝑢32 𝑘𝜏𝑠
𝐾𝑢𝑢33 𝑢𝑧 (𝛼, 𝛽) 𝑃𝜏
 𝜋𝑚 𝜋𝑛
𝑢𝛼𝑘𝑠 = ∑𝑚,𝑛 𝑈𝛼𝑘𝑠 cos ( 𝛼) sin ( 𝑏 𝛽)
𝑎

𝜋𝑚 𝜋𝑛
𝑢𝛽𝑘𝑠 = ∑𝑚,𝑛 𝑈𝛽𝑘𝑠 sin ( 𝛼) cos ( 𝑏 𝛽)
𝑎

𝜋𝑚 𝜋𝑛
𝑢𝑧𝑘𝑠 = ∑𝑚,𝑛 𝑈𝑧𝑘𝑠 sin ( 𝛼) sin ( 𝑏 𝛽)
𝑎
𝜋𝑚 𝜋𝑛
𝑝𝑧𝑘𝑠 = ∑𝑚,𝑛 𝑃𝑧𝑘𝑠 sin ( 𝛼) sin ( 𝑏 𝛽)
𝑎
Propiedades Valor numérico
𝐸1 (𝐺𝑃𝑎) 25
𝐸2 (𝐺𝑃𝑎) 1
𝐸3 (𝐺𝑃𝑎) 1
𝐺12 (𝐺𝑃𝑎) 0.5
𝐺13 (𝐺𝑃𝑎) 0.5
𝐺23 (𝐺𝑃𝑎) 0.2
𝜐12 0.25
𝜐13 0.25
𝜐23 0.25
𝜗 0/90/0
Parámetro Longitud
a, b 1m
𝑅𝛼 , 𝑅𝛽 R
h 0.1m
 𝑘𝜏𝑠
𝐾𝑢𝑢
 Propiedades Lámina 1 Lámina 2
𝐸1 (𝐺𝑃𝑎) 25 25
𝐸2 (𝐺𝑃𝑎) 1 1
𝐸3 (𝐺𝑃𝑎) 1 10
𝐺12 (𝐺𝑃𝑎) 0.5 0.5
𝐺13 (𝐺𝑃𝑎) 0.5 0.5
𝐺23 (𝐺𝑃𝑎) 0.2 0.2
𝜐12 0.25 0.25
𝜐13 0.25 0.25
𝜐23 0.25 0.25
Angulo de rotación (𝜗) 0 90
Bibliografía:
[1] Hale Justin. Boeing 787 from the ground up. QTR_04 06. A quarterly publication Boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine.
[2]Walker Andrew. Carbon, Fiber, Composite and aviation.
[3] J.N. Reddy y C. Liu, «A higher-order shear deformation theory of laminated elastic shells,» International journal of engineering science, vol.
23, nº 3, pp. 319-330, 1985.
[4] J. Yarasca, J. Mantari, M. Petrolo y E. Carrera , «Best Theory Diagrams for cross-ply composite plates using polynomial, trigonometric and
exponential thickness expansions,» Composite Structures, vol. 161, pp. 362-383, 2017.
[5] J. Yarasca, J. Mantari, M. Petrolo y E. Carrera, «Multiobjective Best Theory Diagrams for Cross-Ply Composite Plates employing
Polynomial, Zig-Zag, Trigonometric and Exponential Thickness Expansions,» Composite Structures, vol. 176, pp. 860-876, 2017.
[6] J.L. Mantari , S. Oktem y C. Guedes Soares, «Static and dynamic analysis of laminated composite and sandwich plates and shells by using a
new higher-order shear deformation theory,» Composite structures, vol. 94, pp. 37-49, 2011.
x = r1 (α,β)

y = r2 (α,β)

z = r3 (α,β)

𝑟 = 𝑟1 (𝛼,𝛽) 𝑒1 + 𝑟2 (𝛼,𝛽) 𝑒2 + 𝑟3 (𝛼,𝛽) 𝑒3

𝑑𝑟 = 𝑟,𝛼 𝑑𝛼 + 𝑟,𝛽 𝑑𝛽
 𝑑𝑠 2 = 𝑑𝑟. 𝑑𝑟
𝑑𝑠 2 = 𝑟,𝛼 . 𝑟,𝛼 (𝑑𝛼)2 + 2𝑟,𝛼 . 𝑟,𝛽 (𝑑𝛼 𝑑𝛽 ) + 𝑟,𝛽 . 𝑟,𝛽 (𝑑𝛽)2

𝐴𝛼 = √𝑟,𝛼 . 𝑟,𝛼

𝐴𝛽 = √𝑟,𝛽 . 𝑟,𝛽
 𝑟,𝛼 × 𝑟,𝛽
𝑡𝑛 =
𝐴𝛼 𝐴𝛽
 −𝐴𝛼
𝑅𝛼 =
𝑡𝑛 . 𝒓,𝜶𝜶
−𝐴𝛽
𝑅𝛽 =
𝑡𝑛 . 𝒓,𝜷𝜷
 𝑅 = 𝑟 + 𝑡𝑛 . 𝑧

𝑑𝑆 2 = (𝑑𝑟 + 𝑛. 𝑑𝑧 + 𝑑𝑛. 𝑧)(𝑑𝑟 + 𝑛. 𝑑𝑧 + 𝑑𝑛. 𝑧)

2 2
𝑧 𝑧
𝑑𝑆 2 = ((𝐴𝛼 ) (1 + )) (𝑑𝛼)2 + ((𝐴𝛽 ) (1 + )) (𝑑𝛼)2 + (𝑑𝑧)2
𝑅𝛼 𝑅𝛽

𝑧
𝐻𝛼 = 1 +
𝑅𝛼
𝑧
𝐻𝛽 = 1 +
𝑅𝛽