CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.

mortgagemovies007@gmail.com
617.543.8085p
206.299.9333f

25 December 2017 VIA EMAIL TRANSMITTAL

Re: Pending Litigation with Michael Levitz

Failure on Negotiation of SLS Account No. 1009602497;
Dual Tracking, Force-Placed Insurance, Chain of Title Questions

Property Address: 3718 East Alder Street, Seattle WA 98122

Loan Number(s): 1009602497

We have always had a mutual respect for one another over the years. Witness my November
2015 journal entry referencing you as "a lawyer with a conscience" and I hope that
continues as I publicly declare that your client and others associated with your client (read:
Any and all purported Beneficiaries) have been, and continue to be, a complete Scrooge and
a Grinch to Michael Levitz.

I’ve sent you and your client, Quality Loan Servicing, official notice of violations against Mr.
Levitz going back many years to when he was trying to complete a sale and pay off this
purported loan…. And nobody could find the purported owner of the Note. He has been
ready to pay off this loan since before 2009 when Chevy Chase closed down its offices and
no servicer showed up until months after. And as his requests go unanswered, new parties
show up claiming arrears that his rescission should have legally stopped cold instead of
continuing to put the screws to him with negative amortization. Jesinoski v. Countrywide
Home Loans, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 790 (2015), Johnson v. Nationstar 2016 WL 6075574 (2016).

In my opinion as a former manager of a title company, I believe there has been, and
continues to be, unlawful dual-tracking and forced-place insurance and general Bad Faith. I
see the Beneficiary according to the NoTS in 2010 was of course CCB Libor Series 2005-1
Trust c/o Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems as nominee for Capital One, N.A.

How exactly did the Note then get to:

Chevy chase funding LLC, Mortgage-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-1 in the 2017 NoTS as
Beneficiary?

Can you provide me a chain of title for that?

Because as to the current alleged Beneficiary, that series isn't even registered with the SEC
as noted by SEC Information specialist Larry Mills in his 6 July 2017 attestation. See
attached. That’s questionable.

So in spite of the fact that Mr. Levitz claims that he filed a timely Rescission and in spite of
the fact that you can’t show a clear Chain of Title, Mr. Levitz was ignored, and now
Specialized Loan Servicing is coming after him for the full amount of everything time
immemorial. SLS was taken over by Compushare from Australia in 2011.
 CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.
mortgagemovies007@gmail.com
617.543.8085p
206.299.9333f

Mr. Levitz says their business is to act as a Transfer Agent for these mortgage pools. SLS was
assigned servicing rights by Ambac Insurance in late 2014 followed by
MERS fraudulently assigning the Levitz DOT in early 2015 while adding SLS as stand-in for
US Bank. US Bank was not assigned until early 2011, two years after Chevy Chase Bank
failed, yet SLS was added in 2015 in a DOT assignment by MERS.

SLS requested of Moody's in 2014 a ratings assessment of the mortgage pool allegedly
containing the Levitz home, meaning the certificate was trading somewhere, yet never
registered these certificates with the SEC. The reason all this is relevant is that the Levitz's
could never find a lender they could rely on to be valid. Meanwhile the arrears kept being
claimed against the Levitz home to the point where it became underwater leaving the Levitz's
with no equity, as it was being stolen by false and misleading claims.

Computershare is relevant now because SLS allegedly was assigned the DoT in Feb 2015 as
an agent for US Bank as Trustee of the unregistered mortgage pools that were implied to
contain the Levitz mortgage. If SLS is now accepting the DoT in place of US Bank as Trustee,
then where has Computershare -- as Transfer Agent -- transferred the DOT to?

I am confused. And reasonably so.

What security is the Levitz mortgage now illegally trading under? Are your client’s
bedfellows peddling an illegally trading security outside the US?

The bottom line Rocky is you should suspend the foreclosure sale indefinitely, which
actually protects your client and all of its proverbial bedfellows from the pernicious effects
of well-grounded litigation because your client US Bank does not have a tenable and clear
claim based on a number of factors.

As such, Mr. Levitz informs that he is filing a complaint with the SEC and with the court.
Given what you have just witnessed, and given your duty to maintain integrity of the
Process it is your duty to suspend and stand aside while the matter is wither litigated or
settled.

The 2014 Washington AG Action against your client for False and Deceptive Business
Practices was window dressing. This one is real.

Respectfully submitted,
______________________________________
CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.
kingcast955@icloud.com
mortgagemovies007@gmail.com
http://affordablevideodepo.com
http://iamonlocation.com
http://mortgagemovies.blogspot.com
617.543.8085m

206.299.9333f
CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.
mortgagemovies007@gmail.com
617.543.8085p
206.299.9333f