American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. 1969. Boston: Houghton-Miffllin.

Audi, R. (1986). Belief, Reason, and Inference. Philosophical"Topics 14 (1):27X65.

Ayer, AJ.(1973) The"Central"Questions"of"Philosophy, London: Weidenfeld.

Bain, D. 2003. ‘Intentionalism and Pain’. Philosophical"Quarterly, 53, 213, 502X23.

Bar, 2011 (ed). Prediction"and"the"Brain. OUP.

Bates, Marcia, J. 2005. An introduction to metatheories, theories, and models, In Fisher,

Karen.E., Erdelez, Sandra. and McKechnie, Lynne, eds. Theories of information behavior.
Medford, NJ: Information Today, pp. 1-24.

Bates, Marcia. J. 1994. The design of databases and other information resources for
humanities scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project report no. 4. Online and CD-ROM
review. 18n6: 331-340.

Beghtol, Clare. 1986. Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics: aboutness analysis,
intertextuality and the cognitive act of classifying documents. Journal of documentation 42n2:
84-113.

Beghtol, Clare. 2002. A proposed ethical warrant for global knowledge representation and
organization systems. Journal of documentation 58n5: 507-532.

Beghtol, Clare. 2003. Classification for information retrieval and classification for knowledge
discovery: relationships between “professional” and “naïve” classifications. Knowledge
organization 30n2: 64-73.

BIBLIOGRAFIA

Bliss Classification Association. 2007. The Bliss Bibliographic Classification : history &
description. Available: http://www.blissclassification.org.uk/bchist.htm

Block, Ned 1990: ‘Inverted Earth’. Philosophical"Perspectives, 4, pp. 53X79

Bowker, Geoffrey C. 2005. Memory practices in the sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Bowker, Geoffrey C. and Star, Susan Leigh. 1999. Sorting things out: classification and its
consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Boyd, R., Gasper, P., & Trout, J. D. (Eds.). (1991). The philosophy of science . Cambridge, MA:

Broadfield, A. 1946. Philosophy of classification. London: Grafton.

Bronowski, J. (1965). Science and Human Values. New York: Julian Messner, Inc.

Campbell, D. Grant. 2006. A phenomenological framework for the relationship between the
semantic web and user-centered tagging systems. In Furner, Jonathan and Tennis, Joseph T.,
eds. Proceedings 17th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research 17, Austin, Texas Available
http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1838/.
Carlyle, Allyson. 1989. Matching LCSH and user vocabulary in the library catalog. Cataloging &
classification quarterly. 10: 37-63.

Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A

theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education , 86 , 175–218.

Chisholm, R. (1982). The Foundations of Knowing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Crawford, T., Chen, C., & Kelly, G. J. (1997). Creating authentic opportunities for presenting
science: The infl uence of audience on student talk. Journal of Classroom Interaction , 32 , 1–
13. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition & Instruction , 10
(2&3), 105–225.

Daly, Mary in cahoots with Jane Caputi. 1987. Websters’ first new intergalactic wickedary of
the English language. Boston: Beacon Press.

Day, Ronald. 2001 Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management through
European documentation, critical modernity, and Post-Fordism. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science and Technology 5n29:725-735.

Duell, O. K., & Schommer-Atkins, M. (2001). Measures of people’s beliefs about knowledge and
learning. Educational Psychology Review , 13 , 419–449.

Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their
development . New York: Teachers College Press.

Duschl, R. A. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual,

epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education , 32 , 268–291.

Duschl, R. A., & Hamilton, R. J. (1998). Conceptual change in science and in the learning of
science. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp.
1047–1065). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

Duschl, R., Hamilton, R., & Grandy, R. (1992). Psychology and epistemology: Match or
mismatch when applied to science education? In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of
science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice (pp. 19–47). Albany, NY:
SUNY Press.

Education , 85 , 554–567. Grandy, R. E., & Duschl, R. A. (2008). Consensus: Expanding the
scientifi c method and school science. In R. A. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientifi c
inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 304–325). Rotterdam, The
Netherlands: Sense.

Edwards, D. (1993). Concepts, memory, and the organization of pedagogical discourse: A case
study. International Journal of Educational Research , 19 , 205–225.

Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science

Feinberg, Melanie. 2006. An examination of authority in social classification systems. In Furner,

Jonathan and Tennis, Joseph T. eds. Proceedings 17th Workshop of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research 17,
Austin, Texas. Available list.sir.arizona.edu/1783/01/feinberg.pdf

Fidel, Raya. 1994. User-centered indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science 45n8: 572-578.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making social science matter: why social inquiry fails and how it can
succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Quoted in Mai 2002.

Frohmann, B. 1990. Rules of indexing: a critique of mentalism in information retrieval theory.

Journal of Documentation 46n2: 81-101.

Furner, Jonathan. 2002. Shera's social epistemology recast as psychological bibliology. Social
epistemology. 16: 5-22. Gene Ontology. 2008. Available: http://www.geneontology.org/

Furner, Jonathan. 2007. Dewey deracialized: a critical race-theoretic perspective. Knowledge

organization 34n3: 144-168.

Gettier, E. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge?,Analysis, 23, 121-123.

Gnoli, C. and Poli, R. 2004. Levels of reality and levels of representation. Knowledge
organization. 31n3: 151-160.

Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2003). Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. The
Journal of the Learning Sciences , 12 , 53–90.

Hammer, D., Russ, R., Mikeska, J., & Scherr, R. (2008). Identifying inquiry and conceptualizing
students’ abilities. In R. A. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientifi c inquiry:
Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 138–156). Rotterdam, The
Netherlands: Sense.

Hamza, K. M., & Wickman, P.-O. (2008). Describing and analyzing learning in action: An
empirical study of the importance of misconceptions in learning science. Science Education ,
92 , 141–164.

Hjørland, Birger. 1998. Theory and metatheory of Information Science: a new interpretation.
Journal of documentation 54n5: 606-621.

Hjørland, Birger. 2004. Arguments for philosophical realism in library and information science.
Library trends 52n3: 488-506.

Hodson, D. (1988). Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education ,
72 , 19–40. Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemological research: Implications for learning and
teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review , 13 , 353–383.

Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud

during online searching. Educational Psychologist , 39 (1), 43–55.

Jakobson, B., & Wickman, P.-O. (2008). The roles of aesthetic experience in elementary school
science. Research in Science Education , 38 , 45–65.

Jeng, L. H. 1996. Using verbal reports to understand cataloging expertise: two cases. Library
resources and technical services 40: 343-358.

Jiménez-Aleixandre, M., & Reigosa, C. (2006). Contextualizing practices across epistemic levels
in the chemistry laboratory. Science Education , 90 , 707–733.

Kelly, G. J. (2005). Discourse, description, and science education. In R. Yerrick & W.-M. Roth
(Eds.), Establishing scientifi c classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of research on
teaching and learning (pp. 79–108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kelly, G. J. (2008). Inquiry, activity, and epistemic practice. In R. Duschl & R. Grandy (Eds.),
Teaching scientifi c inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 99–117;
288–291). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

Kelly, G. J., & Crawford, T. (1997). An ethnographic investigation of the discourse processes of
school science. Science Education , 81 , 533–559.

Kelly, G. J., & Green, J. (1998). The social nature of knowing: Toward a sociocultural
perspective on conceptual change and knowledge construction. In B. Guzzetti & C. Hynd (Eds.),

Kelly, G. J., Carlsen, W. S., & Cunningham, C. M. (1993). Science education in sociocultural
context: Perspectives from the sociology of science. Science Education , 77 , 207–220.

Kelly, G. J., Chen, C., & Crawford, T. (1998). Methodological considerations for studying
sciencein-the-making in educational settings. Research in Science Education , 28 , 23–49.

Kelly, G. J., Chen, C., & Prothero, W. (2000). The epistemological framing of a discipline:
Writing science in university oceanography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 37 , 691–
718.

King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing refl ective judgment: Understanding and
promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults . San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge .
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kipp, Margaret E.I. and Campbell, D. Grant. 2006. Patterns and inconsistencies in collaborative
tagging systems: an examination of tagging practices. Proceedings of the 2006 Annual Meeting
of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Austin, November 3-8, 2006.
Available dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1704/

Korotkin, Arthur. L. et al. 1965. Indexing aids, procedures, and devices. Rome Air Development
Center Report RADC-TR-64-582. Available from C.F.S.T. I. as AD 616342.

Krarup, Karl. and Boserup, Ivan. 1982. Reader-oriented indexing. Part of the series, Automation
and Documentation Pamphlets Edited by the Royal Library vol. 2. Royal Library, Copenhagen.

Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd. ed., Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.

Langridge, Derek Wilton. 1989. Subject analysis: principles and procedures. London: Bowker
Saur.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society .
Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

Lawson, A.E. (1995). Science Teaching and the Development of Thinking. Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2003). Individual and sociocultural views of learning in science education.
Science & Education , 12 , 91–113.

Leach, J., Hind, A., & Ryder, J. (2003). Designing and evaluating short teaching interventions
about the epistemology of science in high school classrooms. Science Education , 87 , 831–848.
Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G.

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values . Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Mai, Jens-Erik. 2000. The subject indexing process: an investigation into the problems in
knowledge representation. Dissertation from the University of Texas, Austin.

Mai, Jens-Erik. 2001. Semiotics and indexing: an analysis of the subject indexing process.
Journal of documentation 57n5: 591-622.

Mai, Jens-Erik. 2002. Is classification theory possible? Rethinking classification research. In

LópezHuertas, María. ed., Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the
21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries: Proceedings of the Seventh
International ISKO Conference 10-13 July 2002 Granada. Würzburg: Ergon, pp. 427-78.

MIT Press.

Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New
York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.

Negri, A. 2000. Kairòs, alma Venus, multitudo: nove lezioni impartite a me stesso. Rome:
Manifestolibri.

Negri, Antonio. 1988. Archaeology and project: The mass worker and the social worker.
Revolution retrieved: selected writings on Marx, Keynes, Capitalist crisis and new social
subjects. London: Red Notes: 203–228.

Negri, Antonio. 1999. Value and affect. Boundary. 2n26: 77–88.

Oliver, Lawrence H. 1966. An investigation of the basic processes involved in the manual
indexing of scientific documents. Bethesda, MD: General Electric Company. NSF C-422 [PB 169
415].

Olson, Hope. A. 2002. The power to name: locating the limits of subject representation in
libraries. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Perspectives on conceptual change: Multiple ways to understand knowing and learning in a

complex world (pp. 145–181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, London:
Routledge.

Ranganathan, Shiyali. Ramamrita. 1967. Prolegomena to library classification. 3rd ed. Bombay:
Asia Publishing House.

Reynolds, Paul. D. 1971. A primer in theory construction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Richardson, Laurel. 2004. Writing as a method of inquiry. In Hesse-Biber, Sharlene Nagy and
Leavy, Patricia eds., Approaches to qualitative research: a reader on theory and practice. New
York: Oxford University Press.

Ritzer, George. 1991a. Metatheorizing in sociology. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Ritzer, George. 1991b. Reflections on the rise of metatheorizing in sociology. Sociological
perspectives 34n3: 237-248.

Rorty, Richard. 1982. Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota

Press.

Rorty, Richard. 1999. Philosophy and social hope. New York: Penguin Books.

Sandstrom, A. R., & Sandstrom, P. E. 1995. The use and misuse of anthropological methods in
library and information science research. Library quarterly, 65n2: 161-199.

Šauperl, Alenka. 1999. Subject indication during the cataloging process. PhD Dissertation
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.

Šauperl, Alenka. 2002. Subject determination during the cataloging process. Lanham, MD:
Scarecrow.

Šauperl, Alenka. 2004. Cataloger's common ground and shared knowledge. Journal of the
American

Smith, Barry. 2005. From concepts to clinical reality: an essay on the benchmarking of
biomedical terminologies. Journal of biomedical informatics 39: 288-298.

Society for Information Science and Technology 55n1 :55-63.

Soergel, Dagobert. 1974. Indexing languages and thesauri: construction and maintenance. Los
Angeles: Melville.

Sonesson, G. 1998a. Icon. In Bouissac, Paul ed. Encyclopedia of semiotics. New York: Oxford
University Press.

Sonesson, G. 1998b. Index. In Bouissac, Paul ed. Encyclopedia of semiotics. New York: Oxford
University Press.

Tennis, Joseph T. 2006. Function, purpose, predication, and context of information

organization frameworks. In Budin, Gerhard, Swertz, Christian. and Mitgutsch, Konstantin.
eds., Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the Ninth
International ISKO Conference 4-7 July 2006 Vienna. Würzburg: Ergon, pp. 303-310.

Wenning, C.J. (2005). Levels of inquiry: Hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry
processes. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 2(3), 3-1.

Wilson, Patrick. 1968. Two kinds of power: an essay in bibliographical control. Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.

Wilson, Patrick. 1983. Second-hand knowledge: an inquiry into cognitive authority. Westport,
CT: Greenwood.

Dorothy Edgington. The Paradox of Knowability. Mind, 94(376):557–568, 1985.

Paul Ègre. Epistemic Logic. In Leon Horsten and Richard Pettigrew, editors, The Continuum
Companion to Philosophical Logic, Continuum Companions, pages 503–542. Continuum, New
York, 2011.*** For an introduction to further topics in epistemic logic, go here next.

Frederic B. Fitch. A Logical Analysis of Some Value Concepts. The Journal of Symbolic Logic,
28(2):135–142, 1963.
Jelle Gerbrandy. The Surprise Examination in Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Synthese, 155:21–33,
2007.

Paul Gochet and Pascal Gribomont. Epistemic Logic. In Dov M. Gabbay and John Woods,
editors, Handbook of the History of Logic, volume 7. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006.

Joseph Y. Halpern. Should Knowledge Entail Belief? Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25:483–494,
1996.

Joseph Y. Halpern and Riccardo Pucella. Dealing with Logical Omniscience: E xpressiveness
and Pragmatics. Artificial Intelligence, 175:220–235, 2011.

Vincent F. Hendricks. Mainstream and Formal Epistemology. Cambridge University Press, New
York, 2005.

Vincent F. Hendricks and Duncan Pritchard, editors. Epistemology: 5 Questions. Automatic

Press, Copenhagen, 2008.

Vincent F. Hendricks and Olivier Roy, editors. Epistemic Logic: 5 Questions. Automatic Press,
Copenhagen, 2010.

Jaakko Hintikka. Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions.
Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1962. *** The founding text of modern epistemic logic, still
worth reading.

Jaakko Hintikka. A Second Generation Epistemic Logic and its General Significance. In Vincent
F. Hendricks, Klaus Frovin Jørgensen, and Stig Andur Pedersen, editors, Knowledge
Contributors, volume 322 of Synthese Library.

Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2003. Wesley H. Holliday. Epistemic Closure and Epistemic Logic I: Relevant
Alternatives and Subjunctivism. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 44(1):1–62, 2015.

Wolfgang Lenzen. Recent Work in Epistemic Logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 30:1–219, 1978.

David Lewis. On the Plurality of Worlds. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1986.

David Lewis. Elusive Knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74(4): 549–567, 1996.