Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FROM DICHLOROPROPANOLS
Kinetic Aspects of the Process
Abstract: The reactions involved in the industrial production of epichlorohydrin from dichloro-
propanols (DCP, including 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol and 2-3-dichloro-1-propanlol) have been kine-
tically investigated. The kinetics of dehydrochlorination of DCP has been studied in the presence
of caustic soda, by potentiometric techniques. The kinetic parameters of the reactions have been
determined. The epichlorohydrin hydrolysis has been studied by measuring the decrease of the
reagents during the time using titration. The whole study indicate that both dehydrochlorination
and hydrolysis reaction can be considered as second order kinetic reaction. It is also indicated
that the kinetic constant for dehydrochlorination reaction is far bigger than that for hydrolysis
reaction in the same conditions.
Keywords: dichloropropanol; epichlorohydrin; kinetics; dehydrochlorination; hydrolysis;
activation energy.
EPCH have been studied, both in the presence of caustic temperature control device is also the same as the one
soda. used in dehydrochlorination reaction study. Since this is a
very slow reaction, the reaction rate was determined by
using titration to measure the decrease of the hydroxyl ion
EXPERIMENTAL
concentration as a consequence of the reaction, and the
Equipment, Reagents and Operating Conditions reaction took place in a thermo stated stirred batch reactor.
Three hundred millilitres of basic solution containing about
Both the kinetics of dehydrolorination and hydrolysis reac-
0.2 mol L21 of NaOH was put into the reactor. When the reac-
tions was studied in presence of caustic soda. Dehydrochlor-
tion temperature was reached, one equivalent of EPCH per
ination of DCP in aqueous basic solution is a fast reaction
equivalent of base was used. Runs were made in the temp-
occurring with the elimination of hydrogen chloride. In a
erature range of 322.85 K–344.25 K and in the rotation rate
dilute caustic soda solution, the reaction rate has been deter-
range of 270 –410 r min21.
mined by using a glass complex electrode to measure the
decrease of conductivity of the solution with time according
to the method described by Jin et al. (2005). The conductivity RESULTS
varies with concentration of ions in the dilute electrolyte sol-
ution, and was recorded by the conductivity recorder with Dehydrochlorination Reaction
the measure accuracy of 0.01 mS cm21 and the response In the dehydrochlorination reaction, the hydroxyl ion con-
time of 0.01 s, which make sure that the conductivity centration decreases rapidly during the reaction, and
measurement system has high control accuracy. The temp- caused the conductivity decrease rapidly, which was
erature control device shown in Figure 1 makes sure of the recorded by the conductivity recorder. The experimental
temperature-control with the measure accuracy of 0.01 K. results, in fact, can be well represented by assuming a
The dehydrochlorination reaction took place in a thermo second order kinetic model, of the type:
stated stirred batch reactor. Fifty millilitres of basic solution
containing about 0.01 mol L21 of NaOH was put into the reac- r1 ¼ k1 ½OH ½DCP (4)
tor. When the reaction temperature was reached, 0.25 ml of
the organic reagent was injected into the solution using a The whole data processing was taken according to the
glass syringe, and the potentiometric response was method mentioned by Li (2004).
recorded. Runs made with the two pure dichloropropanols Let
isomers (1,3-DCP and 2,3-DCP) have shown identical reac-
tivity. The kinetic data collected in this paper refer to an indus- 1
M¼
trial mixture of the two isomers mentioned. The main (b a)
component of these mixtures is 1,3-DCP, with little 2,3-DCP h
1 ai
only (Krafft et al., 2005). ln (k0 k/ ) (k0 kt ) (5)
Hydrolysis reaction was studied in a different procedure. kt k/ b
The reactor for hydrolysis reaction study is almost the
The experimental data were obtained for runs made in
same as the reactor shown in Figure 1 but with different
different operating conditions and the kinetic constants
dimensions: diameter of 100 mm, height of 100 mm, and
have been calculated on the basis of the second order kinetic
the diameter of the anchor-like agitator is 45 mm. The
model.
Figure 2 shows the values of M versus time for the dehy-
drochlorination reactions made at different temperatures.
The linearity of the curves justifies the assumption of the
second order for dehydrochlorination reaction, and we deter-
mined the constant k by the slope of the straight line.
Figure 3 shows the exponential-like variation of the kinetic
constant with the temperature, compared with Figures 7–12
in literature (Hu, 1999), we can conclude that the dehydro-
chlorination reaction obeys the general reaction kinetics.
In Figure 4, an Arrhenius plot for this reaction is also
reported. From Figure 4, one can compare the kinetic con-
stants of the reaction in different temperature range:
293 K 313 K and 313 K 333 K. According to the Arrhe-
nius equation (Laidler, 1987a; Kooij, 1893)
k ¼ AeEa=RT (6)
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1580–1585
1582 MA et al.
Figure 2. A plot of M versus time for the dehydrochlorination reaction Figure 4. The Arrhenius plot for the kinetic constants of the dehydro-
performed in the temperature range of 293 K –333 K: reaction made chlorination reaction: reaction made in caustic soda solutions with
in caustic soda solutions with [OH-] ¼ 0.01 mol L21, [DCP] ¼ 0.05 [OH-] ¼ 0.01 mol L21, [DCP] ¼ 0.05 mol L21.
mol L21; the kinetic constants have been calculated assuming a
second order kinetic model.
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1580–1585
SYNTHESIS OF EPICHLOROHYDRIN FROM DICHLOROPROPANOLS 1583
DISCUSSION
The experiments described in this paper, allowed the deter-
mination of the kinetic parameters of the reactions involved in
the EPCH production process. The rates of reactions
involved in the progress are identical, as has been seen
Figure 5. A plot of 1/CNaOH versus time for the EPCH hydrolysis experimentally.
reaction with the rotation rate at 271 r min21: the kinetic constants The Boltzmann factor Ea/RT is considered as the statisti-
have been calculated assuming a second order kinetic model; both
of the initial concentration of NaOH and EPCH are 0.2314 mol L21. cal distribution of energies among the reacting molecules.
And the pre-exponential factor A represents the rate of
activated molecules converting into the product molecules
reaction. In Figure 6, an Arrhenius plot for the kinetic constant (Laidler, 1987b). Both the activation energy and pre-
of hydrolysis reaction is also drawn. The kinetic parameters, exponential factor are temperature dependent. In fact, the
including Ea and A, for hydrolysis reaction are also calculated activation could vary with the temperature, but could be con-
from the data shown in Figure 6. Then, the kinetic expression sidered as changeless at a certain temperature range, and it
of EPCH hydrolysis reaction can be simplified as follows: was also shown in Figure 4. Apparently, the rate of activated
molecules converting into product molecules at temperature
r2 ¼ 5:66 1010 e70 790=RT ½EPCH½OH (10) range 313 K 333 K is big than that at the temperature
range 293 K 313 K. But in the hydrolysis reaction,
To prove that equation (10) could be well applied for the the Arrhenius plot is linear; the activation energy was a
description of hydrolysis reaction, another run was also con- constant at the experimental temperature range.
ducted at different conditions (both for temperature and the For the EPCH formation, the ring closure reaction, occurs
initial concentration of NaOH and EPCH) from the runs according to an internal nucleophilic substitution (SN2) mech-
shown in Figure 5. The reaction results show in Table 2. anism preceded by a base catalyzed dissociation equilibrium.
The hydrolysis reaction kinetic constant at 318.3 K was cal- It is belong to the Williamson reaction (Williamson, 1852;
culated according to equation (10). And the calculated value Ullmann and Sponagel, 1905; Dermer, 1934; Allen and
of k is 0.1354, which is almost the same as the experimental Gates, 1945; Baker and Martin, 1960; Fieser and Fieser,
value in Table 2, with the relative error of 1.81%, which is less 1961), and is similar to the reaction happens between propy-
than 5%. This means equation (10) could be well applied for lene chlorohydrins and caustic soda, as described by Patai
the description of hydrolysis reaction. (1967), Weissberger (1964) and Elderfield et al. (1950).
The reaction mechanism can be represented as follows:
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1580–1585
1584 MA et al.
Table 3. The ratio between the dehydrochloriantion reaction rates and the hydrolysis reaction rates.
DCP isomers which can give EPCH, have the different reac- Although decreasing the temperature is also good for
tivity. Apparently, in the reaction mentioned in progress, the improving dehydrochlorination reaction rate when the reac-
reactivity of 1,3-DCP is much higher than the reactivity of tion temperature is below 313.15 K, the absolute reaction
2,3-DCP. This is due to the inductive effects (Clarki et al., rate is low; and such kind of low temperature is not practical
1989) and space effect. In the structure figure, both halogen- in industrial producing.
oalkyls in 1,3-DCP increased the chlorine mobility or the
negative charge on the oxygen, and the hydroxyl could
CONCLUSION
attack 1-C, and 3-C, but only one halogenoalkyl in 2,3-DCP
could increase the negative charge on the oxygen, and the (1) Both of the dehydrocholorination reaction and hydrolysis
hydroxyl could only attack 2-C. At the same time, it is hard reaction were proved to be the second order kinetic
for the hydroxyl to attack 2-C in 2,3-dicloropropanol due to reaction, and could be well described by the second
the space effect (Salaun, 2000), which is even not exist in kinetic model, which could be applied in reactor design
1,3-DCP. and reaction simulation, obtained in this paper.
(2) In the high temperature range (313.15 K –363.15 K),
enhancing temperature is good for dehydrocholorination
reaction, but it will also enhance the hydrolysis reaction
rate.
(3) If we consider the high temperature of 363.15 K, which is
So the probability of intermediate ion formation is evidently the reaction temperature in industrial process, and for low
not the same. And the activation energy value for the dehy- contact time, yields of EPCH could hardly be affected by
drochlorination reaction in the presence of caustic soda is the hydrolysis reaction. Therefore, low contact time is one
equal to the true activation energy (E) plus the enthalpy of the important factors during designing the distillation
change (DHR ) in intermediate ion formation, that is: column and choosing the optimal operating conditions
for the process of synthesis of EPCH from DCP.
Eapp ffi E þ DHR (12)
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1580–1585
SYNTHESIS OF EPICHLOROHYDRIN FROM DICHLOROPROPANOLS 1585
k/ the infinite conductivity of solution in Hu, Y., 1999, Physical Chemistry, 3rd edition, 312 (Higher Education
dehydrochlorination reaction, mS cm21 Press, Shanghai, China).
DHR enthalpy change in intermediate ion formation during Jin, L., Wu, S. and Chen, D., 2005, Physical chemistry experi-
the synthesis reaction, KJ mol21 ments[M]. Shanghai, East China University of Science and
Technology Press, 1: 55– 58.
Kooij, D.M., 1893, Z Phys Chem, 12: 155.
REFERENCES Krafft, P., Gilbeau, P., Gossenlin, B. and Claessens, S., 2005,
Process for producing dichloropropanlol from glycerol-the
Allen, C.F.H. and Gates, J.W., 1945, a-Butoxynitrobenzene, Organic glycerol coming eventually from the conversion of animal fats
Syntheses, 25: 9. in the manufacture of biodiesel[P], SOLVAY, WO/2005/054167,
Baker, R.H. and Martin, W.B., 1960, Side reaction in the Williamson 7– 10.
synthesis. II, J Org Chem, 25: 1496. Laidler, K.J., 1987a, Chemical Kinetics, 3rd edition, 42 (Harper &
Berthelot and Luca, 1856, Ann Chem, 48(3): 306, 311. Row, New York, USA).
Braun, G. 1932, Preparation of epichloro- and epibromohydrins, J Am Laidler, K.J., 1987b, Chemical Kinetics, 3rd edition, 48 (Harper &
Chem Soc, S4: 1248–1250. Row, New York, USA).
Braun, G., 1943, Glycerol a,g-Dibromohydrin, Organic Syntheses, Li, S., 2004, Measurement of reaction rate constant in ethyl acetate
Coll., 2: 308. saponification, Journal of Luoyang Teachers College, 2: 54– 55.
Carra, S., Santacesaria, E., Morbidelli, M. and Cavalli, L., 1979, Patai, S., 1967, The Chemistry of Functional Groups, 43–49 (Inter-
Synthesis of propylene oxide from propylene chlorohydins—I, science Publishers, Wiley, New York, USA).
Chem Eng Sci, 34: 1123–1132. Sakakibara, M., Katsumata, K., Watanabe, Y., Toru, T. and Ueno, Y.,
Clark, S.A.C., Bawagan, A.O. and Brion, C.E., 1989, The valence 1992, Synthesis, 4: 377.
orbital momentum distributions and binding energy spectra of Salaun, J., 2000, Small Ring Compounds in Organic SynthesisV1
dimethyl ether by electron momentum spectroscopy: an investi- (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany).
gation of the methyl inductive effect[J]. Chemical Physics, 137: Ullmann, F. and Sponagel, P., 1905, Chem Ber, 38: 2211.
407. Weissberger, A., 1964, The Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds,
Clarke, H.T. and Hartman, W.W., 1941, Org Syn Coll, 1: 233. 180, 210 (Interscience, New York, USA).
Claus, 1877, Chem Ber, 10: 557. Williamson, A.W., 1852, J Chem Soc, 4: 229.
Dermer, O.C., 1934, Metallic salts of alcohols and alcohol analogs,
Chem Rev, 14: 409.
Elderfield, R.C. et al., 1950, Synthesis of branched-chain d-
isopropylaminoamyl and 4-isopropylaminobutyl ethers and of
derived bromides, J Amer Chem Soc, 72: 1334. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Fairbourne, Gibson and Stephens, 1930, Chemistry and Industry, 49:
1021. The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support by Shanghai
Fieser, L.F. and Fieser, M., 1961, Advanced Organic Chemistry, 113, Huayi (Group) Company.
306 (Reinhold, New York, USA).
Horsley, H.L., 1965, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, in The manuscript was received 20 April 2007 and accepted for
Othmer, K. (ed.), 595 (Wiley, New York, USA). publication after revision 16 August 2007.
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1580–1585