Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Pack
FOR
INTRODUCTION TO LITERARY THEORY-EST431
Total Teaching Hours For Semester : 75 Total Teaching Hours For Semester : 5
frameworks. It will enable students to critically perceive and engage with the production of meanings, significations and negotiations. This paper will act as a bridge to
Cultural Studies; Popular Culture; Indian Literatures; Postcolonial Studies; Ecological Studies and other studies that will be introduced in the final year and English
Honours.
Learning Outcome
An awareness of the constructed-ness of the literary material, and a refined sense of theory; an ability to look beyond the obvious and rewrite and reconstruct texts
Introducing Theory: Literature and the Need for Criticism and Theory
I.1 What is Literature?I.2 What is Literary Criticism; Literary/Critical Theory?1.3 Literary Criticism/Theory:
Key Ideas: Plato to Leavis (An Overview of the development of theory)
Unit-1 Teaching Hours:10
Introducing Theory: Literature and the Need for Criticism and Theory
I.1 What is Literature?I.2 What is Literary Criticism; Literary/Critical Theory?1.3 Literary Criticism/Theory:
Key Ideas: Plato to Leavis (An Overview of the development of theory)
Unit-2 Teaching Hours:20
2. Ahmand, Aijaz. In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures. Rpt. New Delhi: OUP, 2006.
3. Culler, Jonathan. The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, literature, deconstruction. London/New York: Routledge, 2001. Print.
4. Devy, G.N., ed. Indian Literary Criticism: Theory and Interpretation. Rpt. Hyderabad: Orient Longman, 2007. Print.
nd
5. Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. 2 ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008
8. Habib, M.A.R., ed. A History of Literary Criticism and Theory: From Plato to the Present. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008. Print.
9. John, Eileen and Dominic McIver Lopes, eds. Philosophy of Literature: Contemporary and Classic Readings. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004. Print.
10. John, Eileen and Dominic McIver Lopes. Philosophy of Literature: Contemporary and Classic Readings. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.
11. Kapoor, Kapil. Literary Theory: Indian Conceptual Framework. New Delhi: Affiliated East-West Press, 1998. Print.
12. Klages, Mary. Literary Theory: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum, 2006
13. Leitch, Vincent B., ed. The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. New York:Norton, 2001. Print.
th
14. Rice, Philip and Patricia Waugh. Modern Literary Theory. 4 ed. London: Hodder Arnold, 2001. Print.
15. Rivkin, Julie, Michael Ryan, eds. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Rev ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. Print.
16. Rooney, Ellen ed. Feminist Literary Theory. Cambridge: CUP, 2006. Print.
17. Waugh, Patricia. Literary Theory and Criticism: An Oxford Guide. Oxford: OUP, 2006. Print
Evaluation Pattern
CIA II: Mid Semester Section A: Any 3 questions out of 5. (3x10=30) (Conceptual Questions)Section B: 1x 20=20.
Application question. Compulsory no choice.Total = 50. CIA I: A class test (open book or otherwise on concepts and
application) for 20 marksCIA III: Any creative test that is application based for 20 marks. End Semester Pattern
Section A: 5x10 =50 (Answer any 5 out of 7) Conceptual Questions aloneSection B: 2x25 = 50 (Answer any 2 out of
3) Application based Total 100
Course Plan
Class Name : 4PSENG Subject Name : INTRODUCTION TO LITERARY
THEORY
CIA 1
Component/Task 1
CIA Details
The students would be asked to submit an assignment on an almost daily basis- an analytical essay
on one of the theories prescribed. The students must make use of the resources at library, research
extensively and present a finding they have arrived at on the topic given.
CIA Details will display form 08/11/2017
Learning Objective
Assignment Learning Objectives:The students would develop stronger analytical skills, better writing
skills and achieve well-rounded research ability. Assessment Strategies aligned to LO:The students
would be evaluated based on the following parameters: 5 + 5 + 10 = 20 Parameter 1 = Language
Parameter 2 = Analysis Parameter 3 = Research ability Language = 5 marks Analysis = 5 marks
Research ability = 10 marks Technology Tools used along with their Purpose: None
Assignment Learning Objectives:The students would develop stronger analytical skills, better writing
skills and achieve well-rounded research ability. Assessment Strategies aligned to LO:The students
would be evaluated based on the following parameters: 5 + 5 + 10 = 20 Parameter 1 = Language
Parameter 2 = Analysis Parameter 3 = Research ability Language = 5 marks Analysis = 5 marks
Research ability = 10 marks Technology Tools used along with their Purpose: None
Evaluation Rubrics
Marks Language Analysis Research ability
2 Poor grammar, sentence Minimal analysis without Lack of thorough
construction, and choice of new insight. research, primary and
vocabulary. secondary sources not
quoted extensively.
3 A few errors in grammar, Sharp analysis, but with Average research, with
but altogether well written. logical errors. narrow focus in collecting
Word choice average. data.
4 No grammar errors, Excellent analysis with Exemplary research, with
excellent vocabulary. supporting data. a thorough and intense
focus on chosen material.
CIA 3
Component/Task 1
CIA Details
The students would be asked to conduct and participate in a quiz in terms of some of the theories
discussed in the class.
CIA Details will display form 08/11/2017
Learning Objective
Assignment Learning Objectives: The students would hone their skills to research, plan and
conceptualize a theoretical concept and organize groups of students around an argumentative session.
Assessment Strategies aligned to LO:The students would be evaluated based on the following
parameters:5 + 5 + 10 = 20Parameter 1 = Ability to conceptualize and conduct a quizParameter 2 =
Coherence of argument in terms of the concepts presented with the questions.Parameter 3 = Research
ability Technology Tools used along with their Purpose: None
Assignment Learning Objectives: The students would hone their skills to research, plan and
conceptualize a theoretical concept and organize groups of students around an argumentative session.
Assessment Strategies aligned to LO:The students would be evaluated based on the following
parameters:5 + 5 + 10 = 20Parameter 1 = Ability to conceptualize and conduct a quizParameter 2 =
Coherence of argument in terms of the concepts presented with the questions.Parameter 3 = Research
ability Technology Tools used along with their Purpose: None
Evaluation Rubrics
Concepts = 5 marksCoherence of argument = 5 marksResearch ability = 10 marks