Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prefaces
Purpose
The purpose of this guide is to explain how to photograph common "stuff" in the night
sky. The main part of the guide is organized by increasing level of equipment, starting
with a simple hand-held point-and-shoot and going up to an SLR camera mounted on a
clock-driven equatorial mount. This guide is for digital cameras. Though the techniques
are likely the same for film, I do not have a film camera and so it is not written for that.
The opinions and techniques expressed herein are solely mine. I give no guarantee of
success for you when using them, but I would be surprised if you are unsuccessful if you
follow my instructions. There may be other, better, techniques out there, the ones
expressed here are simply what I've learned over the past few years of doing this.
This guide is meant to be read straight-through. Though you can use it as a common
internet FAQ, I don't recommend it because it is not laid out that way. As it progresses, I
introduce new concepts, ideas, and notes that I do not necessarily repeat later on, even
though they may be relevant.
I have tried to make it easy to follow by including common features at the beginning of
each new section that describes what new things I will be addressing. I have also tried to
point out important notes with arrows ().
Assumptions
This guide assumes that you can find objects in the sky. It simply gives names and
advice on how to photograph, and it should not be used as a how-to-find-stuff manual.
This guide assumes you know how to work your camera and how to manipulate aperture
and exposure length. It also assumes you know how to manually focus.
This guide assumes you know what objects are in the sky or can look them up elsewhere.
I explain some terms, like "Earthshine," if it's a specific thing to be photographed. But,
common astronomical objects (like the Pleiades cluster, the Summer Triangle asterism, or
the Andromeda Galaxy) I will not provide explanations for because that is not the
purpose of this guide. Google is your friend.
Terminology
Field of View - This is how much you can see through your optics. A large field of view
means you can see a lot, whereas a narrow field of view means that you can only see a
little. Field of views are usually measured in angles.
Angular Measurements - There are 360° (degrees) in a circle. Thus, if you could see
everything around you, you would have a 360° field of view. If you can only see objects
from directly left to directly right, you have a 180° field of view. One degree (1°) is
divided into 60' (minutes, or arcmin), while 1 arcmin is composed of 60" (seconds, or
arcsec).
Astrophotography Guide Version 0.5 Page 2 of 16
Constellations - This varies by constellation. There are very small constellations like
Dolphinus or Canes Minor to very large constellations like Virgo, Draco, or Ursa Major.
I'm not going to list the sizes of all 88 constellations, especially because the size varies
depending upon how much you want to see. A few of the more photogenic ones, with
their largest dimension to get most of the good stars are:
Orion - 27°
Hercules - 34°
Leo - 30°
Cygnus - 27°
Gemini - 22°
Böotes - 30°
Canes Major - 19°
Asterisms - These are not "official" constellations, but they are other groupings of stars
that have common names, such as the Big and Little Dippers, the Hyades, or the Summer
Triangle. Some of the more common ones:
Little Dipper - 20°
Big Dipper - 26°
Hyades - 20° or 4° (depending upon how much)
Summer Triangle - 38°
Planets - Very small. The largest as seen from Earth is Venus, which when new gets up
to 1 arcminute, but when full shrinks down to about 10 arcseconds. Jupiter is second-
largest, which gets up to nearly 50 arcseconds. Saturn can appear nearly as large as
Jupiter because of its massive rings. Mars gets up to around 25 arcsec, but it usually
hovers closer to 5. Uranus, Neptune, and Mercury are closer to a few arcminutes, and
Pluto is a point-source.
What is impressive and can be captured in a very big zoom lens (generally need more
than 500 mm equivalent) are the moons of Jupiter, which can span several arcminutes
across. You won't be able to resolve the disk of the moons, but you'll easily be able to
see their positions relative to the larger, brighter planet.
Astronomical Objects - Without a telescope, there are really only two other things I can
think of that you can capture with a normal camera lens: The Pleiades (AKA M45) and
The Orion Nebula (AKA M42). The former is 1.8° in extent while the latter is about 50
arcmin (the part visible with reasonable exposures, anyway … it's over 80 arcmin).
Adding a Tripod
Required Equipment: Camera with manual focus, exposure, and aperture. Tripod.
What Can be Photographed: The Moon. Artificial satellites (trails). Planets as points.
Pleiades.
Major Limiting Factors: Earth's rotation and limited exposure time.
----------
A tripod opens up a few more options. With a tripod and a point-and-shoot camera, you
should be able to take an exposure for up to 30 seconds, which allows you to do a few
more things.
Earthshine
One of the first - and very often over-looked - is Earthshine from the Moon. The Sun
shines light on Earth, but it also shines on the Moon. That makes day on Earth and day
on the Moon, and where it's day on the Moon, it appears very bright (what we normally
think of when we see the Moon). But there's another reflection that goes on: Light
reflects off Earth, onto the Moon, and then back to Earth (so we can see it).
There are two differences with this light. The first is that it's much dimmer since Earth is
far from an ideal reflector. The second is that the light from Earth reflects off the entire
surface of the Moon that is facing Earth at that time, as opposed to just the sun-lit day
side. This means that when the Moon is in a crescent phase, you can still see the entire
disk of the moon due to the Eartshine off of it. The newer the Moon's phase (the thinner
the crescent), the brighter the Eartshine will appear because there's less of the sun-lit
portion showing.
And you can photograph this. It requires an exposure of a few seconds, and the Sun-lit
part of the moon will be completely saturated. But, you can see it, as in the example
below, which was an 8-second exposure, tripod-mounted shot at 18 mm (28.8 mm
equivalent) at I think f/3.5.
Other Stuff
Other observations that open up are satellite passes (they appear as bright streaks in a
time-lapse image) soon after dusk, the Pleiades, and planets (if you don't have a long
enough lens, then you can at least record any interesting conjunctions, like Jupiter and
Venus being close together in the sky, for example).
albeit very small. In the Southern Hemisphere, there is no bright star to mark the South
Celestial Pole (SCP), though the constellation of The Southern Cross spans across it.
If you aim your camera at the pole (you only have one choice unless you're on the
equator, in which case the poles are on the horizons), then the star trails will be arcs with
a center at the pole. If you aim your camera away from the pole, then you will get arcs
with no on-camera center. They can both produce interesting effects as shown in the next
two example images:
Another issue to keep in mind with star trails is that foreground objects, such as the
mountains in the top one and the trees in the bottom one can serve to make the trails more
interesting.
Aperture - Assuming at this point you're going for deep-sky objects (pretty much
anything but the Moon, though planets are sometimes not considered deep-sky objects),
then you want the largest aperture you can get your hands on. Otherwise, you'll need to
take much longer exposures. The amount of light that gets through is proportional to the
square of the f-number. So, for example, my kit lens goes down to f/3.5. A lens I want
to buy is a 50 mm prime at f/1.4. Squaring the two and dividing shows that to get the
same amount of light to come through the lens and onto the detector, I would only need
an exposure 16% the length as I would need with the f/3.5. In astronomy, it's all about
aperture -- bigger really is better, and that's why we're always trying to build bigger and
bigger telescopes.
Exposure Length - There is no rule of thumb that I can give you for exposure of
astronomical objects since it will totally depend upon (1) the object, (2) how dark your
observing site is, and (3) your maximum aperture. The best thing to do is to guess-and-
check.
Atmospheric Turbulence - The atmosphere moves. That's why we have wind, weather,
etc. But, the atmosphere does not move all at once, and it has many different layers that
move on their own. This creates turbulence, and due to various optical properties, it
causes the positions of various parts of the object you're trying to view to move around.
This makes it appear blurry, and it can shift positions slightly between exposures (if
viewing a very small object like a planet). There is no way that you can correct for this at
this level (look up "Adaptive Optics" if you're interested in how astronomers deal with
it). The only thing you can do is to try to minimize it by only photographing during calm
weather, having low humidity, or being at high elevations (like on a mountain).
Earthshine Revisited
At this point in the guide, as I said at the beginning of this section, you should be using
an SLR. Attach your biggest camera lens and set up your mount. Take an image of the
crescent moon for a split second (for me, around 1/20 sec at 1000 mm f/16) to properly
expose the Sun-lit portion of the Moon. Then, take around a 20-second exposure. Then
make a nice montage like the one below (though I used a telescope for the Sun-lit sliver,
you can just use the same super-duper telephoto):
This is a good point to talk about adding images to get better ones. Going back to the
"if you have software that does image arithmetic," you can take several photographs of
the same object, take them into the image arithmetic program, and then take the average
of all the images. This will help to reduce the effects of the noise in the detector, noise in
the sky, and noise that the atmospheric turbulence adds onto the image (it's more for the
atmospheric turbulence that we average in astronomy). See the "Averaging Multiple
Images" sub-section in the "Advanced Techniques for Better Images" section for more
information.
Another piece of equipment you may want for constellations is a cross-screen filter to
produce diffraction spikes on the stars (what some people call "twinkling" though
"twinkling" is caused by something completely different). In real science images,
diffraction spikes are bad (they are caused by the support "spider" that holds secondary
mirrors in place) because we want the stars to be circles and not have their light spread
out all over the place. However, in "pretty picture" astronomy, diffraction spikes
generally make the image look more interesting and they help to bring out the color of the
stars.
An example of adding the diffraction spikes is in this image of the constellation Böotes
and Corona Borealis (the bright orange star is Antares):
Other than those suggestions, the best advice for constellations are to expose as long as
you can without getting too much sky noise, use the largest aperture you can, and take
several images and average them (this is also sometimes called "stacking").
Unfortunately, there is another effect that will come into play at this point that I have
not yet mentioned, and there is no easy way to get rid of it: Vignetting. Vignetting is
when the corners of the field appear darker than the center. The degree of vignetting is
heavily dependent upon the lens. One way to get around the vignetting is to simply mask
out everything but a circle in the center of your image. However, that can be very
unsatisfying. There are several advanced techniques that can be used to remove
vignetting; for more information, see the "Dealing with Vignetting" sub-section in the
"Advanced Techniques for Better Images" section.
Small Stuff
You may notice that this section of the guide is quite short. That's because the small
objects - such as planets, nebulae, star clusters, and galaxies - are, well, really small for
the most part. In order to properly photograph them, you need to have a powerful
telephoto lens.
For example, on a standard camera, a 1000 mm lens will give you a horizontal field of
view of around 2°. In contrast, most telescopes give a field of view of around 20% of
this, around 20 arcmin. Compare this with the largest planet size, Venus, which at its
largest is 1 arcmin. Galaxies and globular clusters, meanwhile, are generally around 10-
30 arcsec in size.
So unless you're going for the largest deep-sky objects - Andromeda Galaxy (AKA M31,
approx. 3° across), Pleiades (AKA M45, approx. 2° across), and other open clusters
(generally around 30-50 arcmin for the larger ones) - you're entering into the realm where
you need a telescope. And if you're going to buy a telescope for astrophotography, you
should be reading a more advanced guide than this.
Subtracting Noise
The more advanced DSLR cameras these days will actually do this for you. But for those
of us who don't have one, you can remove the thermal noise and hot/cold pixel noise by
taking what is known as a "dark" image. To do this, you take a photograph with the lens
cap on for the same length of time as the object you imaged (called the "object" from
now on). Technically, you should do this 3 or more times and take the median of the
dark images, or if you can't do that, take the average (mean). Practically speaking for this
level of photography, you can more realistically take a single dark image.
Once you have your dark, you simply subtract it from the object image. And that's it,
since the detector noise adds linearly to the object.
Alternatively, you could simply use the "Dust and Scratches" filter in PhotoShop to take
care of the hot pixels.
Focusing Advice
Let's face it: It'd be nice if the "infinity" focus location on the camera lens really did
focus at infinity. But - in my experience - more often than not the infinity focus position
is "past" infinity, and you need to back-track slightly in order to get the camera lens
properly in focus. But how can you tell on that tiny little view-finder if your star is in or
out of focus?
One way that I've used is to focus on the Moon. It's big enough that you can usually tell
when you're in or out of focus without taking a picture.
The second method I use - for when the Moon's not out - is to take a picture of the
brightest object in the sky (Venus, Jupiter, Sirius, or another bright object), and then
zoom in all the way on the LCD screen on the photo. If it looks like the bright object is
too big, I adjust the focus slightly and try again. I continue this until I've gotten it as
good as I think is reasonable.
The third method - and I only do this if focus is extremely important and I'm imaging for
a long time on deep-sky objects - is to do the above method, but have the image pop up
live on the computer screen (requires proper software and cables). I can then zoom in in
the camera's software or PhotoShop and actually measure how many pixels across the
object is. I can then adjust the focus slightly and repeat the process and see if it got
better.
If you use method 2 or 3, I would suggest starting at the farthest "infinity" setting your
camera lens has. Then work your way downwards from there.
Also keep in mind that on many zoom lenses (in my experience) the exact "infinity"
focus location will change slightly depending upon what focal length you have your lens.