Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KEYWORDS:
GDP, INFLATION
1. INTRODUCTION
2014 saw a decline in gold prices, plus the Modi government is widely
expected to allow more imports of gold over time. This directly affects the Indian
consumers who happen to be among the top buyers of this precious metal. Our paper
addresses the issue of gold pricing in relation to its most important variables to help
the readers make educated decisions about their future purchases.
Gold, one of the most used investment and hedging tools in the market, has
seen a price increase from 1994 to 2013 on the whole as well as fluctuations in the
short run. Its price increased from an average of US$385.42 per ounce in 1994 to an
average of $1700 per ouncein2012.Even taking the inflation into consideration, the
gold price still jumped dramatically but it fell to $1598 per ounce from 2012 to 2013
and is continuing its downward spiral. (please see the figure below)
Gold price is determined by many factors, such as the US dollar to Indian
Rupee exchange rate, Inflation Rate, Crude oil prices, US dollar short term and long
terminterest rates, and US real GDP. This paper empirically analyses these factors
affecting the price of gold by using Ordinary Least Square, Weighted Least Square
and White-test etc. to help explain this correlation and give guidance to investors
regarding any future investment that they may have in mind.
The alternative hypothesis is that at least one b i does not equal zero
(i=1,2,3,4,5,6,7)
We get F-statistic=50.18677 for a significance level of a=0.05. The
critical value for a 7-numerator freedom and 22-denominator freedom is 2.464
which is less than 50.18677 so we reject H 0 showing that the regression model is
indeed significant.
(4) White-test - The auxiliary regression result is
Y=77571. 36-24.23448X1 +5399095+8.033133X3-1175. 637X4
+477.7411X50.000000000178 X6 -4661.099X7with an
R2=0.825367(Regression results are shown in Table 5)
The white nR2=20*0.825367= 16.20734. From c 2 distribution table, we get
that for a significance level of a=0.05, and freedom level=7, thisc2 critical value
isc2a=0.05=14.067. Because nR2>c2a=0.05it rejects the null hypothesis of
homoscedasticity in this model. Thus to eliminateheteroscedasticity, we use the
Weighted Least Squares method)The WLS equation output is Y=3848.471-
13.70254X1 - 9301.900X2+ 21.87139X3 -16.53885X4-111.7561X5 - 0.000278X6 -
121.6887X7R2=0.825367(Result shown in Table 6)(6) White test for WLSThe aux-
iliary regression result is shown in table 7.HereR 2=0.388622, the white
nR2=20*0.388622= 7.77324. From c2 distribution table, we get that for a signifi-
cance level of a=0.05, and freedom level=7, the c 2 critical value isc2a=0.05= 14.067.
Because nR2<c2a=0.05 we accept the null hypothesis of Homoscedasticity. So
TABLE 2
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS
Test Equation:
Dependent Variable: WGT_RESID^2
Method: Least Squares
Date: 04/11/14 Time: 21:32
Sample: 1994 2013
Included observations: 20
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C
2246.753 591.7512 3.796787 0.0030
US_EXCHANGE_RATE^2
-15049.44 10522.39 -1.430230 0.1804
INFLATION_RATE^2
CRUDE_OIL_PRICE^2
1.424418 2.129075 0.669031 0.5173
SHORT_TERM_INTEREST_RATE^2 1765003. 1757060. 1.004521 0.3367
LONG_TERM_INTEREST_RATE^2 -0.487207 0.523892 -0.929974 0.3723
REAL_GDP^2 -21.57277 64.74409 -0.333201 0.7452
SP500^2 81.69057 76.18201 1.072308 0.3065
3.54E-11 3.45E-11 1.024102 0.3278
538.3493 424.5168 1.268146 0.2309
R-squared Adjusted 0.388622 Mean dependent var 1112.593
R-squared S.E. of -0.056016 S.D. dependent var 1424.216
regression Sum 1463.563 Akaike info criterion 17.71730
squared resid Log 23562174 Schwarz criterion 18.16538
likelihood F- -168.1730 Hannan-Quinn criter. 17.80477
statistic Prob(F-
0.874018 Durbin-Watson stat 2.046375
statistic)
0.565023
AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING GOLD PRICES 13
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
messagethiswithoutPDFtoPrint
TABLE 8
MULTICOLLINEARITY
14
)com/.novapdf.http://www(novaPDFpurchasingby