Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Custom Search
THIRD DIVISION
DECISION
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.:
xxxx
xxxx
I.
II.
A.
B.
III.
xxxx
In sum, this Court finds that the petitioner did not submit
itself voluntarily to the authority of the court a quo; and in the
absence of valid service of summons, the RTC utterly failed
to acquire jurisdiction over the person of the petitioner.
In the same way, the appellate court did not err in denying
petitioner’s Motion to Dismiss Civil Case No. MC99-605 on
the ground of improper venue. In arriving at such conclusion,
this Court quotes with approval the following ratiocination of
the RTC:
xxxx
SO ORDERED.
MINITA V. CHICO-NAZARIO
Associate Justice
WE CONCUR:
CONSUELO YNARES–SANTIAGO
Associate Justice
Chairperson
MA. ALICIA AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ ANTONIO EDUARDO B. NACHURA
Associate Justice Associate Justice
ATTESTATION
CONSUELO YNARES-SANTIAGO
Associate Justice
Chairperson, Third Division
CERTIFICATION
REYNATO S. PUNO
Chief Justice
Footnotes
4 Id. at 371-372.
5 Id. at 180-188.
6 Id. at 97-105.
8 Id. at 733.
9 Id. at 156-159.
10 Id. at 96.
11 Id. at 160-164.
12 Id. at 151.
13 Id. at 152.
16 Id. at 225-226.
17 Id. at 227-230.
18 Id. at 238.
19 Id. at 155.
20 Id. at 239-264.
27 Id.
28 Id.
29 Valmonte v. Court of Appeals, 322 Phil. 96, 106 (1996).
37 Id.