CASE: CIR VS.

SOLIDBANK CORPORATION
G.R. NO. 148191
November 25, 2003

FACTS:
Solidbank filed its Quarterly Percentage Tax Returns reflecting gross receipts amounting
to P1,474,693.44. It alleged that the total included P350,807,875.15 representing gross receipts
from passive income which was already subjected to 20%final withholding tax (FWT).

The Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) held in Asian Ban Corp. v Commissioner, that the 20%
FWT should not form part of its taxable gross receipts for purposes of computing the tax.

Solidbank, relying on the strength of this decision, filed with the BIR a letter-request for
the refund or tax credit. It also filed a petition for review with the CTA where the it ordered the
refund.

The CA ruling, however, stated that the 20% FWT did not form part of the taxable gross
receipts because the FWT was not actually received by the bank but was directly remitted to the
government.

The Commissioner claims that although the FWT was not actually received by Solidbank,
the fact that the amount redounded to the bank’s benefit makes it part of the taxable gross receipts
in computing the Gross Receipts Tax. Solidbank says the CA ruling is correct.

ISSUE:
Whether or not the FWT forms part of the gross receipts tax.

HELD:
Yes. In a withholding tax system, the payee is the taxpayer, the person on whom the tax
is imposed. The payor, a separate entity, acts as no more than an agent of the government for
the collection of tax in order to ensure its payment. This amount that is used to settle the tax
liability is sourced from the proceeds constitutive of the tax base.

These proceeds are either actual or constructive. Both parties agree that there is no actual
receipt by the bank. What needs to be determined is if there is constructive receipt. Since the
payee is the real taxpayer, the rule on constructive receipt can be rationalized.

The Court applied provisions of the Civil Code on actual and constructive possession.
Article 531 of the Civil Code clearly provides that the acquisition of the right of possession is
through the proper acts and legal formalities established. The withholding process is one such
act. There may not be actual receipt of the income withheld; however, as provided for in Article
532, possession by any person without any power shall be considered as acquired when ratified
by the person in whose name the act of possession is executed.

In our withholding tax system, possession is acquired by the payor as the withholding
agent of the government, because the taxpayer ratifies the very act of possession for the
government. There is thus constructive receipt.

The processes of bookkeeping and accounting for interest on deposits and yield on
deposit substitutes that are subjected to FWT are tantamount to delivery, receipt or remittance.
Besides, Solidbank admits that its income is subjected to a tax burden immediately upon “receipt”,
although it claims that it derives no pecuniary benefit or advantage through the withholding
process.

There being constructive receipt, part of which is withheld, that income is included as part
of the tax base on which the gross receipts tax is imposed.