You are on page 1of 5

NK Retal:

North Korea would simply not attack South Korea


or the US without provocation, as Perry of politico
in 17 and Wagstaff of the week in 13 explain North
Korea is not normally crazy enough to strike first,
and is only using its nuclear weapons to gain
concessions from others. However, Anti-missile systems provoke North
Korea and increase the risk of a Kim first strike.
Of a US Preemptive Strike enabled from THAAD:
Weigh this scenario above all else, as this is the most likely scenario because
Everything’s in place for a conventional Preemptive strike from the US to occur.
Trump is calling for one, Mattis is calling for one, Dunford is calling for a
conventional preemptive strike, all because they view North Korea’s
nuclearization as “unimaginable”-That’s Bodeen. The only thing missing is the
US having a perceived safety net from a counterstrike. Gomez tells you THAAD
is that safety net. But in response to the conventional preemptive strike, Miere
tells you clearly north korea would retaliate by striking Seoul.
Boxed in
Krustalev tell you North Korea views THAAD as offensive, they feel boxed in;
the only thing they’ve done when feeling boxed in is retaliate. THIS IS
DIFFERENT FROM Acceleration without AMS; KRustalev tells you is that their
acceleration is in the name of trying to circumvent thaad. This materializes via
This strike will materialize via
Artillery strikes on South Korea
Which mizokami states could kill 1 million south Koreans. But the only time
when North korea feels the need to develop and strike via artillery is to
circumvent THAAD’s deployment-that’s what Reif tells you from case
Even if you buy that missile defense can somehow shoot down these other
measures, Remember madjumar and reif-even if a single launch takes place for
any reason, the US would release a devastating response, causing a huge war
involving South Korea.

You might also like