Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Court of Appeals
VISAYAS STATION
Cebu City
DECISION
LEGASPI, J.:
* Crisologo Abines died while the case was pending in the trial court. No motion for substitution of heirs
has yet been filed.
1 Records, pp. 106-107; issued by Judge Wilfredo Fiel Navarro.
CA-G.R. CEB-CV No. 05635
Decision Page 2 of 11
Because Civil Case No. CEB-27700 had already become final, the
banks consolidated ownership over the 11 parcels of land and TCT No. T-
1833704 was issued in their favor.
Crisologo Abines died on January 28, 2008 while the case was
pending before the trial court. Accordingly, plaintiffs-appellants' counsel
informed the trial court of Crisologo's death during the hearing of the case
on July 27, 2010. Counsel manifested that there is a need to substitute
Crisologo Abines with his heirs and that the Complaint must be amended to
include the buyer of the disputed properties as defendant. Per Order8 issued
on the same date, the trial court granted plaintiffs-appellants motions as
follows:
“When the case was called, counsel for plaintiffs as well as that of
the defendants appeared. Counsel for the plaintiffs manifested that it was
only recently that his office learned of the demise of one of the principal
plaintiffs in this case, Crisologo Abines, and prayed that he be given time
to file a Notice of Death as well as the substitution of said plaintiff.
Besides, given the manifestation of the defendant-bank, that the property
subject of this case had already been disposed of to third parties, plaintiffs'
counsel likewise prayed for time to implead the necessary parties, that is,
the vendees of the property in litigation.
8 Records, p. 71.
9 Records, p. 102.
CA-G.R. CEB-CV No. 05635
Decision Page 5 of 11
“When the case was called, only plaintiff and counsel appeared.
There is no appearance for the defendant and counsel. However, counsel
for the plaintiff manifested to the court that there is a need to amend the
complaint in order to implead an indispensable party as one of the
defendants and he needs time to be able to do so and prayed for the
cancellation of today's pre-trial and he be given a period of time to file the
necessary amended pleadings and possibly a motion for leave together
with said amended pleading. Finding the motion to be well-taken, the
same is hereby GRANTED. The plaintiff is given fifteen (15) days from
today to file the necessary motion for leave together with the amended
pleading. And the defendant is given the same number of days from
receipt of the said motion to file any opposition or amended answer as it
may deem proper.
SO ORDERED.”
During the 5 July 2011 hearing of the motion to cancel lis pendens,
the trial court issued the assailed 5 July 2011 Order11 dismissing the
Complaint and cancelling the notice of lis pendens annotated on TCT No. T-
183370. The Order reads:
Again, the plaintiffs were given fifteen (15) days from said date, that is,
from March 9, 2011 to file an amended complaint. Unfortunately,
however, no pleadings for the substitution of plaintiff Crisologo Abines
was filed until today. Neither was an amended complaint filed to implead
a new defendant as ordered by the court. In fine, therefore, the plaintiffs
have defied two (2) orders of this court, that is, the order of July 27, 2010
and that issued on March 9, 2011. Pursuant to section 3 Rule 17 of the
1997 Revised Rules of Civil Procedure, it is very clear that failure to
comply with any order of the Court on the part of the plaintiff or any
party, for that matter, may warrant dismissal of the Complaint upon the
court's discretion or instance.
SO ORDERED.”
For its part, defendant-appellee BPI filed its appeal brief15 to refute the
arguments raised by plaintiffs-appellants. It argues that the trial court was
correct in dismissing the case. To grant plaintiffs-appellants' motion to admit
amended complaint would render nugatory Section 3, Rule 17 of the Rules
of Court, which states that the complaint may be dismissed for failure of the
plaintiff to “prosecute his action for an unreasonable length of time, or to
comply with these Rules or any order of the court.” As to the second
argument, defendant-appellee BPI counters that the cancellation of the
notice of lis pendens was warranted under the circumstances obtaining in the
case.
appellants' failure to comply with the orders of the court, in particular, the
Orders dated July 27, 2010 and March 29, 2011. The first Order granted
plaintiffs-appellants' request to file a notice of death and substitution of the
late Crisologo Abines. Meanwhile, the second Order granted plaintiffs-
appellants' request to amend the complaint in order to implead an additional
defendant. For failing to comply with these Orders, the trial court dismissed
the Complaint in the assailed 5 July 2011 Order.16
16 Vide footnote 1.
CA-G.R. CEB-CV No. 05635
Decision Page 9 of 11
In Bautista vs. Teodoro, Jr., 54 Off. Gaz. 619, this Court upheld the
dismissal by the trial court of a complaint for failure of the plaintiff to
comply with its order, either to amend her complaint or to file a bill of
particulars within ten days from receipt of notice and within an extension
of time prayed for by her and granted by the court.”
We also rule that the trial court acted correctly in cancelling the notice
of lis pendens annotated on TCT No. T-183370. Since there is no more
pending suit to speak of, the lis pendens annotated on the title should
necessarily be cancelled.
SO ORDERED.
19 Section 77. Cancellation of lis pendens. Before final judgment, a notice of lis pendens may be canceled
upon order of the court, after proper showing that the notice is for the purpose of molesting the adverse
party, or that it is not necessary to protect the rights of the party who caused it to be registered. It may
also be canceled by the Register of Deeds upon verified petition of the party who caused the registration
thereof.
At any time after final judgment in favor of the defendant, or other disposition of the action such as to
terminate finally all rights of the plaintiff in and to the land and/or buildings involved, in any case in
which a memorandum or notice of lis pendens has been registered as provided in the preceding section,
the notice of lis pendens shall be deemed canceled upon the registration of a certificate of the clerk of
court in which the action or proceeding was pending stating the manner of disposal thereof.
CA-G.R. CEB-CV No. 05635
Decision Page 11 of 11
Original Signed
GERMANO FRANCISCO D. LEGASPI
Associate Justice
WE CONCUR:
Original Signed
GABRIEL T. INGLES
Executive Justice
Original Signed
MARILYN B. LAGURA-YAP
Associate Justice
C E R T I FI CAT I O N
Original Signed
GABRIEL T. INGLES
Executive Justice
Chairperson, Eighteenth Division