You are on page 1of 3

October 26, 2017 Meeting Minutes School West High

Logistics Date Start & End Time Location Facilitator Minute Taker Data Analyst
Today’s Meeting 10/26/17 7:00-7:30 Andy’s Office A.J. Emily Andy
Next Meeting 11/2/17 7:00-7:30 Andy’s Office A.J. Emily Andy

Meeting Attendance: List all team members & bold names of team members who attend the meeting
A.J. Cassidy Emily Youngblut Joe Kadlec
Matt Tobin Marsha Watters Byron Phillips Andy Miehe
Carrie Schaefer Kate Luensmann Tyler Morehead Aaron Reinhart

Today’s Agenda Announcements Next Meeting Agenda Items


1.Review Agenda 4. Organizational Housekeeping 1. 1.
2. Overall status of Problem Behavior -- 2. 2.
3.Student Problem Solving -- 3. 3.
--Previous Problem(s) --Reports to Other Teams 4. 4.
--New problems? 5.Assessment of Meeting 5. 5.

Overall Status Tier/Content Tier/Content Area Measure Used Data Collection Schedule Current Level/Rate
Area (Tier I, II, III, Reading,
Math, Social Behavior)
Overall Status of
Implementation Fidelity
Overall Status of Student
Outcomes

Todd. A. ​\V .. ​Newton, ​J. ​S.. Algozzinc. K.. Homer. R. H.. Algozzinc. B.. ​& ​Cusumano, D. ​L. ​{2013). The Team Initiated Problem Solving (TIPS 11). Eugene, OR: UniYersity of Oregon, Educational and Community Surrorts.
Student Problem Solution Actions Who? By Goal & Timeline Fidelity of Imp. Measure Effectiveness of
Precise Problem Statement (Prevent, Teach, Acknowledge, When? (What/How/When/Who Solution
(What, When, Where, Who, Why) Correct, Extinguish, Safety) to measure/report) (What/How/When to
assess report)
Initial Levels:

Established date:
Current rate/level per school day=
Follow Up Follow Up
□​Not Started □​Worse
□Partial imp. □No Change
□Imp. w/fidelity □Imp. But not to Goal
□Stopped □Imp. & Goal met

________________________________________​Meeting Minutes continued Date​_________________________________________________

Organizational & Housekeeping Discussion Decisions and Tasks Who By When


Items

Meeting Assessment (Mark your ratings with an “X”) Our Rating


Yes So-So No
1. Was today’s meeting a good use of our time? x

2. In general, did we do a good job of ​tracking​ whether we’re completing the task we agreed on at previous meetings? x

3. In general, have we done a good job of actually ​completing​ the tasks we agreed on at previous meetings? x

4. In general, are the completed tasks having the ​desired effects​ on student behavior? x

If some of our ratings are “So-So” or “No” what can we do to improve things?

Todd. A. ​\V .. ​Newton, ​J. ​S.. Algozzinc. K.. Homer. R. H.. Algozzinc. B.. ​& ​Cusumano, D. ​L. ​{2013). The Team Initiated Problem Solving (TIPS 11). Eugene, OR: UniYersity of Oregon, Educational and Community Surrorts.
Todd. A. ​\V .. ​Newton, ​J. ​S.. Algozzinc. K.. Homer. R. H.. Algozzinc. B.. ​& ​Cusumano, D. ​L. ​{2013). The Team Initiated Problem Solving (TIPS 11). Eugene, OR: UniYersity of Oregon, Educational and Community Surrorts.

You might also like