Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2016
Hypothesis: It was assumed, based on the price that Philips is the most
expeditious, since usually expensive products are the ones sparing best
of the results.
Materials:
• Safety goggles
• Stirring rod
• Plastic pipette
• Antacids
• hydrochloric acid (HCL)
Variables
Procedure: 140 ml of beaker was filled with tap water 5 drops of each
product were put into a beaker using pipette and one drop of
phenolphthalein in each.. And drops of HCl poured for each material
unless they turn transparent, signifying they are taking affect.
Observation:
Qualitative Quantitative
st nd
Description 1 2 3rd Avera Ranking
trial trial trial ge
The solution turned pink
when the
Phillips phenolphthalein was 24 27 24 25 2nd
added. Adding 13 drops drops drops drops drops
into the solution turned
it cloudy and continued
turning it slowly into
pink. At 25 drops, the
solution turned
transparent
Moving onto the next product, Phillips turned pink when one drop of
phenolphthalein was first added, pink color began to fade away at one
drop of HCl and the solution turning cloudy at 13 drops of and gradually
turning loght pink, progressing to transparency at 25 drops.
Conclusion:
Life Brand has the most effectiveness of the three antacids, since the
quality in this experiment is dependent on the volume of HCl needed
to neutralize the antacid not the price of it. Therefore, the hypothesis
is rejected.
Error Analysis: Errors in this experiment to be pointed out are more
than a couple, first being that the pipette didn’t have any form of
measurement whatsoever, thus the drops off the pipette couldn’t be as
accurate as they were completely dependent to the pressure applied by
the user, one way to fix this problem would be to measure all the
solutions as needed in well measured test tubes, away from other
classmates, to be only utilized for your team’s experiment, which brings
to my next point, same pipettes and flask being used over again by
various kids in class could have affected the accuracy of results since
some chemicals may not be completely soluble and may sometimes be
sticky, such as magnesium hydroxide. Water alone may not be able to
remove all the magnesium hydroxide left from different trials or
brands, thus wiser to use different materials for each antacid
implementation. Another error to point out is me, and my experiment
and real life mate Mohamed Elgobashy deciding to cut the pipette off
the top for our experiment as a cause of lack of patience and deficiency
of enough time for the experiment, solution to this would be to
implement the experiment at a time only set to do the experiment, not
in class and to be patient with the slow progress.
Application: The experiment results reveal that Life Brand is the most
effective antacid in treating excess acidity in the alimentary canal,
meaning that Life Brand would be the best in treating cases of acidity in
the fastest time possible in comparison to other antacids experimented
on. It is important to be able to fix acidity as quick as possible for the
patient as It may limit their full potential as a person, thus limiting their
contribution the world.
Discussion Questions:
Phillips:
10
0
Milk…
Life…
5
4 Philips
3
2
1
Number of drops of antacid
Philips Life Brand Milk of Magnesia (mint flavour)
4. Based on your results, what was the most effective antacid? Explain
your reasoning. Indicate the active ingredient in this antacid and write
a balanced chemical equation to show the reaction between your
active ingredient and the hydrochloric acid (HCl) in your stomach.
Based on the results obtained from this experiment, the most effective
antacid is Life Brand antacid out of the 3 antacids. Life Brand turned
neutral at 29 drops, which is more than the two other brands. Phillips
required 25 and Milk of Magnesia (mint flavour), 21.3 drops to become
neutral.
I think the reason we went with adding ACID to BASE in lab is since it is
a small scale experiment, and wiser to not use excess of HCl, since it
could have been quite a wreck. And I say, it wouldn’t really affect the
outcome as once the ACID and BASE are neutral with pH, there is no
problem regardless of what is added into what.
i think it is after because if you don’t feel any heartburn, chances are
that you do not need an antacid as it is useless, however if the problem
is regular, I assume it would be wiser to take one down before
breakfast each day, as it would prevent any heart burn from occurring
in the first place.
Citations:
"ANTACIDS: THEIR EFFECT BY TITRATION AND WITHIN THE HUMAN STOMACH(0)." ANTACIDS:
THEIR EFFECT BY TITRATION AND WITHIN THE HUMAN STOMACH**. N.p., 01 June 1941. Web.
06 Nov. 2016.
"General Chemistry Labs." Acid-Base Titrations: Standardization of NaOH and Antacid. N.p., n.d.
Web. 06 Nov. 2016.
"Nonprescription Medicines and Products-Antacids and Acid Reducers." WebMD. WebMD, n.d.
Web. 06 Nov. 2016.
By Relaxing the Lower Esophageal Sphincter to Release Gas, Peppermint Encourages the Release
of a Belch after a Meal, Hence the Popularity of After-dinner Mints. "Antacids." Antacids. N.p.,
n.d. Web. 06 Nov. 2016.