Professional Documents
Culture Documents
English 1T
Susie Huerta
19 March 2018
Unwanted
“Corre, Corre !!” would yell the coyotes. These were some of the brief words I remember
from a journey many don't forget. Coming from one of the most violent countries in the
our nation grows economically, culturally, and so forth, as a population residing in the US we
should adjust to the needs of those immigrants to see how it is we can improve not just their lives
interpreting the lives of many refugee immigrant kids seeking asylum here in the US in her book
“Tell Me How It Ends An Essay In Forty Questions”. Luiselli explains her perspective through
the top 40 questions asked in a questionnaire to see whether these kids are eligible for asylum.
Through those 40 questions Luiselli inputs her opinion on why these kids should be granted
some sort of asylum. Many children go through treacherous journeys and for what ? Just to come
to the United States and get dehumanized by those who don't want them here, or who think they
are far more superior because of a piece of paper that says their legal status. Tensions between
American Citizens and immigrants is due to tensions built up by this very own country. Because
of the history and relation between the US and Mexican and Northern Triangle Countries,
migrant children should be granted some form of asylum or protection in the US. We have all
Carbajal Aguilar 2
seen in the news that immigration policies is an issue and continues to be an even bigger issue as
However in order to acknowledge the bigger problem going on in the Northern Triangle
countries, we must find out the root of where they first started. According to The Center for
Justice and Accountability who specialize in the pursuit of justice from crimes, and human right
abuses mention that the root of the problems in many Northern Triangle countries ( Honduras, El
Salvador, Guatemala, etc ) has always been land. These countries are able to produce many
resources like the cocoa beans, plantains, and many other things that Europeans or other
countries might not be able to. The involvement of the US government and what broke the bond
they had built with the Salvadoran government wasn't their involvement with trying to get land.
It was all in trying to get the leftists party ( campesinos ) to go against the right side party ( elite,
military ). In this case we see that even though it wasn't about land, it always comes down to
something and in this case it was all about politics. The US had always aided the Salvadoran
government however an event that drew the line for this government was when four American
church women were raped and killed by military and paramilitary Salvadoran forces. That is
when President Carter decided to cut aid to El Salvador. However, “U.S. policy took a dramatic
shift with the election of President Ronald Reagan in 1980. Asserting a hemispheric-wide
national security strategy, the Reagan administration considered the Salvadoran government–its
atrocities notwithstanding–a friend in the Cold War… When the FMLN ( Farabundo Marti
National Liberation ) launched an all-out attack on the government on January 10, 1981, the
United States came to the Salvadoran government’s assistance and provided them with
substantial military aid and advisors.” Essentially the US thought they were being of help by
Carbajal Aguilar 3
providing many Salvadoran people with weapons to defend themselves, but they basically gave
them the tools to destroy themselves. Although the US “aided” El Salvador in times when it was
in crisis, it was only beneficial to them because they saw this as an opportunity to further their
political influence amongst the leftists party which is made up of lower income groups Which
leads onto the birth of MS13. Many of the people that migrated from El Salvador were
traumatized by the events in the Civil war of their country. Many were defensive young adults
who came with fear, trauma, and the need to protect each other. MS13 originated in Los Angeles,
the place of the bloods and crips. Since many young people migrated to Los Angeles during the
time of the civil war in order to escape the extreme violence there, many felt the need to create
this gang in order to protect themselves from other gangs. They created a familia. A familia
As Americans we have to inform ourselves on the history of why many of these kids
choose to migrate to the US. These refugee kids go through problems and traumas that no kid
should ever go through. By informing and explaining these problems to Americans it would
cause a shift in perspectives towards them and why they should be considered for asylum. Many
get three choices. You either join the gang (voluntarily). Get killed. If not get forced to join the
gang and if you refuse, your whole family is persecuted. Like Luiselli mentions, “And perhaps
the only way to grant any justice -- were that even possible -- is by hearing recording those
stories over and over again so that they come back” ( Luiselli 30 ). Luiselli emphasizes the
danger of normalizing the horror and violence these immigrants face. By continuously saying
these stories we are bringing awareness to others and exposing them in ways we can educate
each other. Another specific story she mentions in her book that should resonate with many is the
Carbajal Aguilar 4
story of a Honduran boy who was running with his friend from MS 13 members who wanted to
beat them up, and as he looked back his friend had been shot. No person should ever see their
best friend or anyone die in such a cruel manner. As Americans we have gotten so used to
normalizing the violence and horror around us and being comfortable as long as our skin is not
being put on fire. When in reality we should care about these refugee kids being granted an
opportunity at another shot at life here in the US. Adding unto this just like the US and Northern
Triangle countries have had their fair share in creating these problems for future generations to
find solutions to. As previously mentioned the US has had its fair share in providing El Salvador
with the tools to destroy itself, just like many of these countries have created their own tools.
In order for relations between these countries to be better the US must take ownership
and take the lead and acknowledge how it has damaged these countries leading many to migrate.
Although many politicians, conservatives, and even U.S citizens might oppose this idea and say
that the U.S has done nothing but help these countries in times when they were most suffering,
they did. But they were also the reason many of these countries suffered in the first place. The
U.S has implemented many programs that helped Northern Triangle countries. For example, the
TPS programs also known as Temporary Protected Status was implemented to help certain
countries that had suffered from armed conflict or natural disasters, such as the Haitians when
many received it because of the 2010, 7.0 magnitude earthquake. Another example is DACA --
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival. Which was granted to those who came to the US at a
young age and granted the opportunity to work, and go to school. Although all these forms have
helped, they have all been temporary and under the Trump Administration they are under
jeopardy to getting removed permanently. Therefore there needs to be other ways in which a
Carbajal Aguilar 5
permanent form is established that either guarantees full asylum here in the US or creates a
pathway towards citizenship for many of these kids and immigrants. In order to move forward in
this process the US must lead by example, like Luiselli says in her text, “It would surely be a
step forward for our governments to officially acknowledge the hemispheric dimensions of the
problem, acknowledge the connection between such phenomena as the Drug wards, gangs in
Central America and the united states, the consumption of drugs, and the massive migration of
children from the Northern Triangle to the united states through Mexico. No one, or almost none,
from producers to consumers, is willing to accept their role in the great theater of devastation of
these childrens lives.To refer to the situation as a hemispheric war would be a step forward
because it oblige us to rethink the very language surrounding the problem, and, in doing so,
imagine potential directions for combined policies” (86). In this Luisell emphasizes the
importance in recognize the naming the many causes of the problems. The US leading by
example has to recognize that the causes create “hemispheric war” because when the leader
recognizes its faults its followers follow. Therefore these kids are technically considered
refugees and should be granted asylum because many are stuck in a war they didn't create.
Immigrants are the future of this country, they always have, always will be. Therefore
these kids should be granted asylum instead of being seen like a burden but rather an asset.
Immigrants are the hardest group of working people. Being an immigrant myself, I am living
proof of the brightness of this future. Tying this back to my previous claim. Although the US has
caused a lot of harm to these countries, nothing can cause more harm than the removal of
DACA, although many politicians and tax payers may see this program as a burden, it is
completely false! the DACA program has helped in the advancement of our economy, education
Carbajal Aguilar 6
and more. Many of the kids under this program are promising students that bring a lot to the
table. The loss of this program would not benefit the states, According to the American Progress
a progressive public policy research and advocacy organization they mention in their article “A
new threat to DACA could cost states Billions of Dollars” that the states should really reconsider
in removing this program, and instead look to invest more into it and create some sort of path so
that these kids have the opportunity to contribute much more to society, economy, and
government. Adding unto this, according to a report by the Institute on Taxation and Economic
Policy ( ITEP ) they mention that “An estimated 11 million undocumented residents pay about
eight percent of their incomes in state and local taxes every year… they pay billions of dollars,
and their contributions would be much greater if some sort of reform or pathway to citizenship
was granted.” The giant flow of these kids should not be seen as a burden but rather be seen as
an asset in how they are bettering our country, not just them but the people coming along with
them.
By understanding the history of why these kids choose to flee their countries it should
change our perspectives on how we view them, and when the US decides to step it up and take
ownership that's when the real change will be seen. But through all the conflicts and problems
that many face at an early age, and migrating to a country that's not even their own, they should
have the right to be granted something in order to feel safe in place that's not their own.
Carbajal Aguilar 7
Works Cited
● Luiselli, Valeria, and Lizzie Davis. Tell Me How It Ends: An Essay In Forty Questions.
● Passel, Jeffrey S., and D’Vera Cohn. “Unauthorized Immigrant Population, National and
State Trends, 2010.” Pew Hispanic, Pew Research Center, 1 Feb. 2011,
● Svajlenka, Nicole Prchal, et al. “A New Threat to DACA Could Cost States Billions of
● El Salvador: War, Peace, and Human Rights, 1980-1994, Special Collection, The