You are on page 1of 5

Coverting dB/2.83w to dB/1w - diyAudio http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/29472-coverting-db-2-83...

Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way Welcome, fvg50. [log out]
You last visited: Today at 02:25 AM
Coverting dB/2.83w to dB/1w Private Messages: Unread 0, Total 0.

Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki User CP Donations FAQ Calendar Community Quick Links Search

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to


help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title /


More PMs / More album space
/ Advanced printing & mass
image saving

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread

4th March 2004, 06:29


#1
AM

Coverting dB/2.83w to dB/1w

moving_electron
What is the conversion to change an efficiency spec that is in dB/2.83w to one that is in dB/1w so
diyAudio Member that one can compare apples to apples.

Since the power would be 2.83 times less it would seem that the efficiency rating would be reduced
by a little over 3 dB. But what is the actual correction?

Join Date: Jan 2004


Location: Where the rain does
fall but the trees grow tall

4th March 2004, 06:56


#2
AM

kelticwizard 8 ohm speaker: 2.83 volts = 1 watt


Wizard of Kelts
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus 4 ohms speaker: 2.83 volts = 2 watts. At equal efficiency, the 4 ohmer will have a plus 3 dB higher
rating at 2.83 Volts than an 8 ohms speaker.
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The
Nutmeg State 2 ohms speaker: 2.83 volts = 4 watts. The two ohm speaker at equal efficiency will have a plus 6 dB
higher efficiency at 2.83 volts than it will at one watt.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body."
-Anonymous

4th March 2004, 10:01


#3
AM

Re: Coverting dB/2.83w to dB/1w


sreten
diyAudio Member RIP
Quote:
Join Date: Nov 2003 Originally posted by moving_electron
Location: Brighton UK
What is the conversion to change an efficiency spec that is in dB/2.83w to one that
is in dB/1w so that one can compare apples to apples.

Its not quite apples to apples.

It depends on the load handling capability of an amplifier.

Take an amplifier 50W on the point of clipping into 8 ohms.

With 16 ohms output will be typically ~ 28W into 16 ohms.

1 de 5 21/08/2017 09:03
Coverting dB/2.83w to dB/1w - diyAudio http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/29472-coverting-db-2-83...

With 4 ohms amplifiers vary a lot, typically producing between


55W and 90W into 4 ohms, the latter value is more load tolerant.

Speakers of equal efficiency will give max outputs directly


related to the power output of the amplifier into that load.

But note that a 8 ohm speaker 3dB less efficient than a 16 ohm
speaker will have nearly the same maximum output with the
above amplifier.
For 4 ohm tolerant amplifiers the the same reasoning can be
used, a 4 ohm speaker 6dB less efficient than a 16 ohm
speaker will have nearly the same maximum output with the
above amplifier.

If you also note that bass extension is generally inversely


proportional to efficiency, less efficient more bass extension,
it becomes clear amplifier matching is critical to optimise
maximum performance.

2.83V is 1 Watt into 8 ohm. (dB/2.83V)

For impedance Z, you change the dB/2.83V


by 10 x log (Z/8) to derive the dB/W figure.

sreten.

4th March 2004, 02:59


#4
PM

I wrote:
moving_electron
Quote:
diyAudio Member
What is the conversion to change an efficiency spec that is in dB/2.83w to one that is in
dB/1w

I was not realizing that the 2.83 was a voltage spec rather than a watt spec. Thanks for the
clarifications and considerations.

Join Date: Jan 2004


Location: Where the rain does
fall but the trees grow tall

4th March 2004, 03:24


#5
PM

Ron E dB~=10*log10(Re/8)
diyAudio Member
If you have a 4ohm speaker with a 3 ohm voice coil, rated at 93dB/2.83V, its 1W sensitivity would be

dB=10*log10(3/8) = -4.26dB or 88.74dB

-------------

Join Date: Jun 2002 The least ambiguous spec is the 2.83V spec. Manufacturers play around with the ambiguity of the 1W
Location: USA, MN spec so I wouldn't trust it.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of
how the world works. --Carl Sagan
Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western
prosperity. —Aldous Huxley

4th March 2004, 03:46


#6
PM

kelticwizard Ron:
Wizard of Kelts
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus You gave us the following equation for comparing SPL at 2.83 volts to SPL at 1 watt:

Join Date: Sep 2001


dB~=10*log10(Re/8)
Location: Connecticut, The
Nutmeg State
The only thing is: you assume that an 4 ohm rated speaker with a 3 ohm voice coil should be rated at
3 ohms. But that an 8 ohm rated speaker should be rated with a DC resistance, (Re), of 8 ohms.

2 de 5 21/08/2017 09:03
Coverting dB/2.83w to dB/1w - diyAudio http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/29472-coverting-db-2-83...

If you are going to use the DC resistance of the 4 ohm speaker, then you should use the DC
resistance of the 8 ohm speaker.

As you know, a speaker rated at 8 ohms is very likely to have a DC resistance, (Re) of between 5.5
and 6.5 ohms. Call it 6 ohms as an estimate.

So your equation becomes:


dB~=10*log10(Re/6) = 10*log10(3/6) =-3.01 dB.

So the 4 ohm speaker rated at 93 dB @ 2.83volts will be 89.9999dB at 1 watt. Or 90 dB for short.

Am I correct on this?
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body."
-Anonymous

4th March 2004, 03:54


#7
PM

sreten Quote:
diyAudio Member RIP
For impedance Z, you change the dB/2.83V
Join Date: Nov 2003 by 10 x log (Z/8) to derive the dB/W figure.
Location: Brighton UK

base 10 was assumed for the log and nominal impedance assumed.

Re values can be very misleading and the above doesn't


take into account different impedance characteristics.
But the above is correct, if you use Re values, the Re
of 8 ohms nominal is nominally 8/root2 = 5.6R.
Nominal Re for 4ohms is 2.8R.

The correct ratio's are Z/8 or Re/5.6.

sreten.

5th March 2004, 02:20


#8
AM

Ron E 2.828 Volts is 1Watt into 8 ohms


diyAudio Member
2.828 volts into 3 ohms is 2.828^2/3 = 2.666Watts into 3 ohms

10*log10(2.666)= 4.26dB

I made no errors, Kelticwizard.


The question was how to convert 2.83V ratings to a 1W rating.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN It does not matter if the 4ohm voice coil is actually 2 ohms or 3 ohms or 4 ohms. The conversion
from volts to watts with an assumed resistive load is not difficult...............

sreten wrote:
Quote:

The correct ratio's are Z/8 or Re/5.6

sreten is wrong.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of
how the world works. --Carl Sagan
Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western
prosperity. —Aldous Huxley

5th March 2004, 04:54


#9
AM

kelticwizard Quote:
Wizard of Kelts
Originally posted by Ron E
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus

Join Date: Sep 2001


Location: Connecticut, The It does not matter if the 4ohm voice coil is actually 2 ohms or 3 ohms or 4 ohms.
Nutmeg State
The conversion from volts to watts with an assumed resistive load is not

3 de 5 21/08/2017 09:03
Coverting dB/2.83w to dB/1w - diyAudio http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/29472-coverting-db-2-83...

difficult...............

Okay, but what bothers me is that a speaker with a 3 ohm voice coil will not be playing at 3 ohms in
practice. The lowest impedance it will be playing at will be 4 ohms.

So why are we using Re in that formula instead of nominal impedance? It is never going to play at 3
ohms.

It seems to me that by the same token, if we have a speaker with a 6 ohm voice coil that is rated 90
dB @ 2.83 volts/1M, then at 1 watt we have:
dB~=10*log10(Re/8)
dB= 10 log (6/8) = -1.25

A speaker with an Re of 6.0 is certain be rated at 8 ohms.

The eight ohm speaker is 88.25 db @ 1W/1M


but 90 dB at 2.83V/1M

Is that true? That just about every speaker rated 8 ohms is really less efficient than what the 2.83V
specs would indicate?
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body."
-Anonymous

5th March 2004, 08:03


#10
AM

sreten Quote:
diyAudio Member RIP
Originally posted by Ron E
Join Date: Nov 2003 2.828 Volts is 1Watt into 8 ohms
Location: Brighton UK
2.828 volts into 3 ohms is 2.828^2/3 = 2.666Watts into 3 ohms

10*log10(2.666)= 4.26dB

I made no errors, Kelticwizard.


The question was how to convert 2.83V ratings to a 1W rating.

It does not matter if the 4ohm voice coil is actually 2 ohms or 3 ohms or 4 ohms.
The conversion from volts to watts with an assumed resistive load is not
difficult...............

sreten wrote:

sreten is wrong.

I'm afraid Ron E it is you who has got it all wrong.

I never assumed resistive loads, I assumed nominal loudspeaker loads.

Speakers are tested with a constant voltage for dB/2.83V.

A 4 ohm speaker with with the same voltage sensitivity as


an 8 ohm speaker is basically 3 dB less efficient, not 4.26.

If you want to compare relative efficiencies of speakers


then Z/8 or Re/5.6 can be used makes no difference.

The fact that 2.83V into an 8R resistor is 1 Watt is a nicety.

If you insist using this then the relative efficiency according


to your method of an 8ohm speaker is 10log 6/8, i.e. -1.26,
and the relative efficiency of 4 and 8 ohm speakers with the
same voltage sensitivity is still - 3dB.

People do not seem to understand the meaning of nominal speaker impedance :

The average impedance of the speaker must be higher or = nominal.


The lowest impedance must not be less than nominal/root2.

One of the two will decide the nominal impedance,


unless the manufacturers cheat in their specifications,
which is not exactly unknown.

4 de 5 21/08/2017 09:03
Coverting dB/2.83w to dB/1w - diyAudio http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/29472-coverting-db-2-83...

It should be obvious that dB/2.83V is easy to measure.

Real efficiency is must harder as it depends on the


impedance curve and is an essentially useless figure.
However using Z nominal of the speaker will give you an idea.
Using Re of a driver will give an unrealistically low figure.

sreten.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >

Quick Reply

Message:

Options
Quote message in reply?

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules

You may post new threads


You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump
Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post

Coverting guitar amp to bass crysisfx Instruments and Amps 2 26th January 2009 10:37 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

Search Frequently Asked Questions


Privacy Statement Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Log Out fvg50

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:56 AM.

Home - Contact Us - Advertise - Rules - diyAudio Store - Sponsors - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top - Opt-out policy

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 13.04%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio

5 de 5 21/08/2017 09:03

You might also like