INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

For Teachers

Name of Employee : Name of Rater: REGINA P. PALABRICA

Position : TEACHER 1 Position: HEAD TEACHER III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division : QUEZON NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review:
Rating Period : 2015-2016

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight
per KRA ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
RESULTS
40%

Prepared 180 lesson plans/daily log of activities

5
with five parts based on the budget of work.

Prepared 170 lesson plans/daily log of activities

4
with four parts based on the budget of work.

· Prepared daily lesson plans

Basic Education I. Teaching- and daily log of activities with five Prepared 160 lesson plans/daily log of activities
I.1 June-March 20% 3 4 4 0.8
Policy Services Learning Process parts based on the approved with three parts based on the budget of work.
budget of work.
Prepared 150 lesson plans/daily log of activities
2
with two parts based on the budget of work.

Prepared 140 and below lesson plans/daily log

1 of activities with one part based on the budget of
work.

5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.

4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.

· Facilitated reading
intervention program using 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators.
Basic Education I. Teaching- reading strategies/tools running
I.2 June-March 10% 5 3 0.3
Policy Services Learning Process records/LIP materials, lesson
plan/SLE, activity sheets, reading
passages, books (small/big)
 · Facilitated reading
intervention program using
Basic Education I. Teaching- reading strategies/tools running
I.2 June-March 10% 5 3 0.3
Policy Services Learning Process records/LIP materials, lesson
plan/SLE, activity sheets, reading 2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.
passages, books (small/big)

1 Has 1 or none of the identified indicators.

5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.

· Implemented classroom 4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.

rules and guidelines by providing
Basic Education I. Teaching- School CPP Handbook, Guidance
I.3 June-March 5% 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators. 3 0.15
Policy Services Learning Process Record, behavior charts, Report
Card, and list of classroom rules
and regulations 2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.

1 Has 1 or none of the identified indicators.

5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.

· Monitored attendance,
4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.
cleanliness, and orderliness of
classrooms by accomplishing SF1
Basic Education I. Teaching-
I.4 and Report Card, assigning June-March 5% 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators. 4 0.2
Policy Services Learning Process
individual/group daily tasks,
posting list of classroom officers, 2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.
and providing bulletin board

1 Has 1 or none of the identified indicators.

Weight
per KRA ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
RESULTS
20%
Administered reading assessment to 90% and
5
above of the class within the rating period.

Administered reading assessment to 89-80%

4
and above of the class within the rating period.

Administered reading assessment to 79-70%

3
* Administered reading and above of the class within the rating period.
Basic Education II. Pupils July and
II.1 assessment 90% of the class 5% 3 0.15
Policy Services Outcomes
within the rating period. February
 * Administered reading
Basic Education II. Pupils July and
II.1 assessment 90% of the class 5% 3 0.15
Policy Services Outcomes
within the rating period. February
Administered reading assessment to 69-60%
2
and above of the class within the rating period.

Administered reading assessment to 59% and

1
below of the class within the rating period.

Has conducted remedial instruction to 5 or more

5
academically slow learners.

Has conducted remedial instruction to 4

4
academically slow learners.
· Conducted remedial
Basic Education II. Pupils instruction weekly to 5 Has conducted remedial instruction to 3
II.2 June-March 5% 3 4 0.2
Policy Services Outcomes academically slow learners based academically slow learners.
on the assessment result.
Has conducted remedial instruction to 2
2
academically slow learners.

Has conducted remedial instruction to 1 or none

1
academically slow learner.

5 Has 9-10 of the identified indicators.

4 Has 7-8 of the identified indicators.

· Maintained updated pupils'
record by accomplishing SF1,
Basic Education II. Pupils SF2, SF3, Form 137, Form 138,
II.3 June-March 5% 3 Has 5-6 of the identified indicators. 5 0.25
Policy Services Outcomes Composite/Grading Sheet,
Nutritional Status, FCR, Class
Reading Profile, Pupils Portfolio 2 Has 3-4 of the identified indicators.

1 Has 1-2 or none of the identified indicators.

5 GSA increased by 10% and above

4 GSA increased by 100 %

· Increased FCR result by

Basic Education II. Pupils
II.4 10% from the baseline to June-March 5% 4 0.2
 3 GSA increased by 70-79%
· Increased FCR result by
Basic Education II. Pupils
II.4 10% from the baseline to June-March 5% 4 0.2
Policy Services Outcomes
achievement.
2 GSA increased by 60-69%

1 GSA increased by 59% and below

Weight
per KRA ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
RESULTS
30%

5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.

Conducted periodic PTA 4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.

meetings/ conferences at least
once every grading period with
Basic Education III. Community
III.1 accomplished indicators, such as June-March 10% 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators. 5 0.5
Policy Services Involvement
attendance sheet, agenda of the
meeting, minutes of the meeting,
pictorials, narrative report. 2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.

1 Has 1 or none of the identified indicators.

Has conductedhome visitation to 90- 100% of

5
pupils needing academic monitoring/follow-up.

Has conductedhome visitation to 80-89% of

4
pupils needing academic monitoring/follow-up.

Conducted home visitation to

Basic Education III. Community Has conductedhome visitation to 70-79% of
III.2 100% of pupils needing academic June-March 5% 3 3 0.15
Policy Services Involvement
monitoring/follow-up.
pupils needing academic monitoring/follow-up.

Has conductedhome visitation to 60-69% of

2
pupils needing academic monitoring/follow-up.

Has conductedhome visitation to 59% and below

1
of pupils needing academic monitoring/follow-up.
 Project/event/activity accomplishment with full
5 documentation report of completion duly
approved by the HRPTA officers

Undertaken/ Initiated project/ 4

Project/event/activity accomplishment with full
event/ activity with documentation report of completion
Basic Education III. Community
III.3 HRPTA/PTA/internal and external June-March 5% 5 0.25
Policy Services Involvement
stakeholders funding/ Project/event/activity accomplishment with
3
sponsorship in a year. partial documentation report of completion

Project/event/activity accomplishment with no

2
documentation report of completion

1 No initiated Project/event/activity

Participated 4 or more events/activities in the

5
community within the rating period.

Participated 3 events/activities in the community

4
within the rating period.
Participated 4 events/activities in
Basic Education III. Community
III.4 the community within the rating June-March 10% Participated 2 or more events/activities in the 5 0.5
Policy Services Involvement
period.
3
community within the rating period.

Participated 1 or more events/activities in the

2
community within the rating period.

No participated events/activities in the

1
community within the rating period.

Weight
per KRA ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
RESULTS
10%

Conducted action research and published in the

5
District's Official Journal .

Conducted action research with full

4 documentation and duly signed by the Division
TWG.
IV. Professional Conducted classroom- based
Basic Education
Growth and IV.1 Action Research within the rating June-March 5% Conducted action research with full 4 0.2
Policy Services Development period. 3 documentation and duly signed by the District
TWG.

Conducted action research with partial

2 documentation and duly signed by the District
TWG

1 No action research conducted

 Initiated and participated 2 or more co-curricular
5
activities within the year

Initiated and participated 1 co-curricular activity

4
IV. Professional Initiated and participated 2 co- within the year
Basic Education
Growth and IV.2 curricular activities within the June-March 2% Participated 2 or more co-curricular activities 4 0.08
Policy Services Development year.
3
within the year.

Participated 1 co-curricular activity within the

2
year.

1 No participation of co-curricular activity

Produced publication/ creative work published in

5 National Circulation/DepEd Post/ CSC
Newsletters and similar publications.

Produced publication/ creative work published in

IV. Professional 4
Basic Education Produced a publication/ creative regional publications.
Growth and IV.3 June-March 1% 1 0.01
Policy Services Development
work for school papers in a year.
Produced publication/ creative work published in
3
division publication.

2 Produced publication/ creative work published in

school papers.
1 Unpublished work produced.

Received 4 or more special awards/ citations/

5
recognitions.

Received 3 special awards/ citations/

4
recognitions.
IV. Professional · Received special
Basic Education Received 2 special awards/ citations/
Growth and IV.4 awards/citation/ recognition for June-March 2% 3
recognitions. 1 0.02
Policy Services Development exemplary performance in a year.
2 Received 1 special award/ citation/ recognition.

1 No special award/citation/recognition received.

OVERALL RATING FOR

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned. ACCOMPLISHMENTS VERY SATISFACTORY
58 3.96

REGINA P. PALABRICA EDEN R. VALDEZ ROGER J. CARIO

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

PRINCIPAL II
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
For Master Teachers

Name of Employee : Name of Rater: ROSELINE P. VICENTE

Position : MASTER TEACHER I Position: OIC-ASDS
Bureau/Center/Service/Division : QUEZON NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review:
Rating Period : 2016-2017
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight
per KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
30% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T

I. Professional Conducted 1 duly approved by the SDO fully implemented in

Growth and 5
the school and adapted in the district
Development
Conducted 1 duly approved by the SDO fully implemented in
Conducts at least one action research 4
the school.
related to teaching Conducted 1 duly approved by the SDO fully
1.1
methodologies/strategies/behavior of
June-April 5% implemented in the classroom. 4 3 3
Conducted 1 duly approved by the SDO fully implemented in
3
students within a year the classroom.

2 Proposed an action research with no implementation

1 No action research

Participated at least 4 or more seminar-workshops/trainings

5
within the rating period.

Participated at least 3 seminar-workshops/trainings within the

4 rating period.

Attend/Participate 4 seminar-workshops/ Participated at least 4 or more seminar-

I.2
trainings within the rating period.
June-April 10% 3
Participated at least 2 seminar-workshops/trainings within the
rating period. workshops/trainings within the rating period. 5 5 5

Participated at least 1 seminar-workshop/training within the

2
Basic rating period.
Education
Policy Services 1 No seminar-workshops/trainings attended.

Received award/recognition in national level within the rating

5 period.

Receive award/ recognition in national,

Received award/recognition in division level within
I.3 region, division, district, school level within June-April 10% the rating period. 3 3 3
the rating period.
Policy Services

Received award/recognition in Regional level within the rating

4 period.
Receive award/ recognition in national,
Received award/recognition in division level within the rating Received award/recognition in division level within
I.3 region, division, district, school level within June-April 10% 3 period. the rating period. 3 3 3
the rating period.
Received award/recognition in district level within the rating
2 period.

Received award/recognition in school level within the rating

1 period.

Serve as demonstration teacher, facilitator Has 4 lesson demonstrations or at least 1 national/regional

5
demonstration teaching
or resource speaker at the
Has 3 lesson demonstrations or at least 1 division
school/district/division/regional/nationaland/ 4
demonstration teaching
or provided mentoring services to
Has 2 lesson demonstrations or at least 1 district
I.4 demonstration teachers during the year June-April 5%
3
demonstration teaching Has no lesson demonstration (school level) 1 1 1
2 Has 1 lesson demonstrations (school level)

1 Has no lesson demonstration (school level)

Weight
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA
35% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T

5 Has 360 or more minutes of actual teaching loads

4 Has 350-359 minutes of actual teaching loads

Handle 360 minutes of actual teaching
II.1 loads as reflected in the class program of June-April 15% 3 Has 340-349 minutes of actual teaching loads Has 360 or more minutes of actual teaching loads 5 5 5
activities and SF7.
2 Has 330-339 minutes of actual teaching loads

1 Has 329 or less minutes of actual teaching loads

5 Increased achievement test by 5% or more over baseline test.

4 Increased achievement test by 4% or more over baseline test.

3 Increased achievement test by 3% or more over baseline test.

Increase achievement test by 5% over Increased achievement test by 4% or more over
II.2
baseline test results.
June-April 10% baseline test. 4 4 4
2 Increased achievement test by 2% or more over baseline test.

1 Increased achievement test by 1% or less over baseline test.

Increased instructional and independent readers by 50% or

5
more in the posttest .

Basic
Education Increase the number of instructional &
Policy Services independent readers in the posttest from
the pretest by 50% or conduct July and Increased instructional and independent readers by
II.3 5% 5 5 5
 Basic
Increased instructional and independent readers by 40-49% in
Education Increase the number of instructional & 4
the posttest .
Policy Services independent readers in the posttest from
the pretest by 50% or conduct July and Increased instructional and independent readers by30-39% in Increased instructional and independent readers by
II.3
remediation/enrichment programs to February
5% 3
the posttest . 50% or more in the posttest . 5 5 5
improve performance indicators in any
specific discipline Increased instructional and independent readers by 20-29% or
2
more in the posttest .

Increased instructional and independent readers by 19% or

1
less in the posttest .

Attained 75% and above required competencies in a given

5
period of time.

Attained 70-74% required competencies in a given period of

4
time.

Attain 75% of the required learning Attained 65-69-% required competencies in a given period of Attained 75% and above required competencies in a
II.4 July-April 5% 3
time. given period of time. 5 5 5
competencies in a given period of time.
Attained 60-64% required competencies in a given period of
2
time.

Attained 59% and below required competencies in a given

1
period of time.

Weight
per KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
30% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T

III. Support to Observe all teachers in a year with post Conducted mentoring/coaching to 4 or more teachers in the
Instructional conference. 5
school/cluster/line.
Supervision *all teachers in the department (big secondary
schools) Conducted mentoring/coaching to 3 teachers in the
*all teachers in small secondary schools 4
school/cluster/line.
*all teachers in small elementary schools
*all teachers in the assigned grade level for Conducted mentoring/coaching to 3 teachers in the
III.1 central schools June-April 10% 3
Conducted mentoring/ coaching to 2 teachers in the
school/cluster/line. 4 4 4
school/cluster/line.

Conducted mentoring/ coaching to 1 teacher in the

2
school/cluster/line.

1 No teacher conducted mentoring/coaching.

Managed/Monitored 5 or more teachers in the implementation

5
of the RPMS cycle.

Basic
Manage/Monitor 5 teachers in the
Education Managed/Monitored 3 teachers in the
 Managed/Monitored 4 teachers in the mplementation of the
4
RPMS cycle.
Basic
Manage/Monitor 5 teachers in the
Education Managed/Monitored 3 teachers in the
III.2 implementation of the RPMS cycle within July-April 10% 3
Managed/Monitored 3 teachers in the mplementation of the 5 5 5
Policy Services RPMS cycle. mplementation of the RPMS cycle.
the rating period.
Managed/Monitored 2 teachers in the implementation of the
2
RPMS cycle.

Managed/Monitored 1 or none teacher in the implementation

1
of the RPMS cycle.

5 Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book to 5 or more teachers

4 Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book to 4 teachers.

Check daily Lesson Plans/Journals/Log

III.3 June-April 10% 3 Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book to 3 teachers. Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book to 2 teachers. 2 2 2
book to 5 teachers.
2 Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book to 2 teachers.

1 Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book to 1 or none teacher.

Weight
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA
5% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T

IV. Community Participated 4 or more events/activities in the community

5
Involvement/ within the rating period.
Stakeholders
Participated 3 events/activities in the community within the
Engagement 4
rating period.

Basic 1. Maintain harmonious relationship with Participated 2 or more events/activities in the community
Education IV.1 superiors, students, local and public June-April 5% 3
within the rating period. 5 5 5
Policy Services officials and co-teachers
Participated 1 or more events/activities in the community
2
within the rating period.

No participated events/activities in the community within the

1
rating period.

Weight
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA ACTUAL RESULTS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
 Plus Factor 1. Serve with evidences in any four (4) of
(Each item gets .25 accomplishments on the following:
but not to exceed 1 pt a). Committee or Program Chairman or Served in any 4 or more related tasks with the full
for all the items) Coordinator with project/accomplishment like Gender 1 documentation/artifacts/action plan/program of activities, and
& Development or Adop-A-School accomplishment report/certification
b). District Key Teacher
c.) Facilitator, documenters in SLAC or INSET
d). Committee member-division, district, regional
level e).
Guidance Teacher f).
ICT/LIS Coordinator g). Served in any 3 related tasks with the full
Canteen Manager h). 0.75 documentation/artifacts/action plan/program of activities, and Served in any 4 or more related tasks with the full
Clinic Teacher i). Club accomplishment report/certification
or Organization adviser such as SPA, SSG etc. documentation/artifacts/action plan/program of activities, and
j). Officer in accomplishment report/certification such as:
Basic any academic organization k). Resource a).ICT/LIS Coordinator
Education Person l. Research June-April
b). Canteen Manager
Policy Services Focal Person m). Research
Presenter n). c). Clinic Teacher
Examiner/Proctor in any National Examination o). Served in any 2 related tasks with the full d). Club or Organization adviser such as SPA, SSG etc.
Other special tasks such as Curriculum Writer, Test 0.5 documentation/artifacts/action plan/program of activities, and
Constructor, and MOOE Assistant 2. accomplishment report/certification
Attained zero absent and zero late from June 2017-
April 2018. 3.
No Retained/Zero drop-out rate

Served in any 1 related task with the full

0.25 documentation/artifacts/action plan/program of activities, and
accomplishment report/certification

TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING ASSESSMENT 4.87
Plus Factor 1% ADJECTIVAL RATING Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating Scale:
Outstanding 4.500 5.000
3.500 4.499
Very Satisfactory 2.500 3.499
Satisfactory 1.500 2.499
Unsatisfactory 1.000 1.499
Poor
ROGER J. CARIO AVEGAIL ALARCON CONSTANTINO ROSELINE P. VICENTE
Principal II Ratee IOC-ASDS
Rater Approving Officer

Served in any 4 or more related tasks with the full

1 documentation/artifacts/action plan/program of
activities, and accomplishment report/certification

Served in any 3 related tasks with the full

0.75 documentation/artifacts/action plan/program of
activities, and accomplishment report/certification

Served in any 2 related tasks with the full

0.5 documentation/artifacts/action plan/program of
activities, and accomplishment report/certification

Served in any 1 related task with the full

0.25 documentation/artifacts/action plan/program of
activities, and accomplishment report/certification
E P. VICENTE

ALUATION

SCORE
AVERAGE

3.3 0.17

5.0 0.50

3.0 0.30
 3.0 0.30

1.0 0.05

SCORE
AVERAGE

5.00 0.75

4.00 0.40

5.00 0.25
 5.00 0.25

5.00 0.25

SCORE
AVERAGE

4.00 0.40
 5.00 0.50

2.00 0.20

SCORE
AVERAGE

5 0.10

SCORE
 vities, and

G etc.

4.87
Very Satisfactory
E P. VICENTE
OC-ASDS
oving Officer
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
For Master Teachers

Name of Employee : AVEGAIL ALARCON CONSTANTINO Name of Rater: ROGER J. CARIO

Position : MASTER TEACHER I Position: Principal II
Bureau/Center/Service/Divis : QUEZON NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: April 2018
Rating Period : 2017-2018
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weig
ht
per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS TARGET ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE KRA SCORE
RESULTS

20% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T AVERAGE

I. Professional Conducts at least one action research related Should have conducted Action Research
Growth and to teaching methodologies/strategies/behavior
OUTSTANDING= Crafted and conducted data gathering with
Development of students within a year.
5 interpretation, conclusions and recommendation, adopted and Crafted and
Mode of verification (MOV): implemented in the school. conducted data
a. Hard copy of manuscript Should propose gathering with
VERY SATISFACTORY= Crafted and conducted data
b. Approved request in the conduct of 4
gathering but incomplete.
title of Action interpretation,
1.1 research duly signed by the June-April 4% Research related conclusions and 5 5 5 5.0 0.20
SATISFACTORY= Crafted three (3) parts with approval of to the subject recommendation,
principal/department head c. 3 area. adopted and
department head and principal.
Approved title duly signed by the implemented in the
principal/department head 2
UNSATISFACTORY=Crafted three (3) parts with approval of school.
department head.

1 POOR= with title only.

Attend/Participate seminars-workshops/ Should have attended seminars-workshops/ trainings and conferences

conducted by DepEd(National/Regional/Division/District/School)
trainings and conferences within the rating
period. Mode Should
5 Participated in national/regional seminar-worshops/trainings. participate/atten Participated in
of verification (MOV):
d in School national/regional
I.2 a. Certificate of Appearance/Participation June-April 4% 4 Participated in division seminar-worshops/trainings.
seminar- seminar- 5 5 5 5.0 0.20
b. worshops/trainin worshops/trainings.
3 Participated in district seminar-worshops/trainings.
Memorandum gs.
c. Pictures/Official documentations 2 Participated in district seminar-worshops/trainings.

1 Participated in school seminar-worshops/training.

Receive special award/s, citation/s, Should have received special awardscitation/s, recognition/s
recognition/s, in national/region, division,
district, school level for exeplary performance
within the rating period.
Mode of verification (MOV): Should receive
special Received
Certificate/Certification
 Receive special award/s, citation/s,
recognition/s, in national/region, division,
district, school level for exeplary performance Received award/recognition in National level within the rating
5 period.
within the rating period.
Mode of verification (MOV): Should receive
Received award/recognition in Regional level within the rating
4 special Received
Certificate/Certification period.
Basic I.3 June-April 4%
award/recognitio award/recognition in
5 5 5 5.0 0.20
n in School level division level within
Educati 3
Received award/recognition in Division level within the rating
within the rating the rating period.
period.
on period.
Policy Received award/recognition in District level within the rating
2 period.
Service
s Received award/recognition in School level within the rating
1 period.

Enroll/Finish graduate studies Should enroll and finish graduate studies

Requiredevidences:
Mode of verification (MOV):
5 Doctoral Degree
a. Transcript of Record
b. Certificate/ Certification
c. Diploma d. 4 Masteral Degree Should have
I.4 Pictures June-April 4% units in Masteral with units only 1 1 1 1.0 0.04
CARMA (Complete Academic Requirements for Degree.
3
Masteral/Dortoral degree

2 Achieved units leading to Comprehensive Examination

1 with units

Involve/Participate in community and civic - Should involve/participate in community and civic -

organization activities. organization activities.
Mode of verification (MOV): Participated 4 or more events/activities in the community
a.Certification 5 Should
within the rating period.
b.Pictures involve/ Involved/
Participated 3 events/activities in the community within the participate 2 Participated 4
4
rating period.
events/activitie events/activities in
I.5 June-April 4%
Participated 2 or more events/activities in the community s in the the community 5 5 5 5 0.04
3
within the rating period. community within the rating
within the period.
Participated 1 or more events/activities in the community rating period.
2
within the rating period.

No participated events/activities in the community within the

1
rating period.

Weig
ht
per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE KRA TARGET SCORE
RESULTS
40% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T AVERAGE
Basic II.Instructional Assist principal in instructional monitoring of Should have assisted principal in instructional monitoring of
Educati Supervision teachers through observation. teachers:
on Mode of verification (MOV): Should assist
a. Teachers' Observation Assisted the
Policy the principal in
principal in
Sheet b. Teachers' DLL/Lesson instructional
Service instructional
 Basic II.Instructional Assist principal in instructional monitoring of
Educati Supervision teachers through observation.
on Mode of verification (MOV): Should assist
5 7 teachers were observed within a semester Assisted the
Policy a. Teachers' Observation the principal in
principal in
Sheet b. Teachers' DLL/Lesson instructional
Service 4 5-6 teachers were observed within a semester instructional
Plan c. Pictures/Documentation monitoring by
monitoring and
s II.1 June-April 15% observing 3-4 3 3 3 3.00 0.45
observed 4
3 3-4 teachers were observed within a semester teachers in the
teachers in the
department
department within
within a
2 1-2 teachers were observed within a semester a semester.
semester.

1 No teachers were observed within a semester.

Provides technical assistance to teachers Should have assisted principal in instructional monitoring of teachers:
through mentoring, coaching and cliniquing.
Mode of verification Should provide
5 7 teachers were given technical assistance.
(MOV): technical Provided technical
a. Pictures 4 5-6 teachers were given technical assistance.
assistance to assistance to
teachers through teachers through
II.2 June-April 15% mentoring, mentoring, coaching 5 5 5 5.00 0.75
3 3-4 teachers were given technical assistance. coaching and and cliniquing 5
cliniquing 3-4 teachers in the
teachers in the department
2 1-2 teachers weregiven technical assistance.
department.

1 No teachers were given technical assistance.

Serve as Demonstration Teacher within the Serve as Demonstration Teacher within the school year
school year
Mode of verification (MOV):
a. Matrix/Program 5 4 Demo-Teaching within the school year
b. DLL with Collaboration
c. Pictures/Documentation 4 3 Demo-Teaching within the school year Should have
atleast 1 demo- 1 Demo-Teaching
II.3 June-April 10% teaching within within the school year 2 2 2 2.0 0.20
3 2 Demo-Teaching within the school year the school year.

2 1 Demo-Teaching within the school year

1 No Demo-Teaching within the school year

Weig
ht
per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE KRA TARGET SCORE
RESULTS
40% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T AVERAGE
III. Prepare and execute Daily Logs/Lesson Plans Should prepare and execute Daily Lesson Logs/Lesson Plans
including appropriate, adequate and updated instructional materials
Instructional including appropriate, adequate and updated
Competence instructional materials. Should prepare
Mode of verification (MOV): and execute 81-
Prepared and
a. DLL/Lesson Plan 90% Daily
executed 91-100%
Lesson
b. Picture of instructional materials Daily Lesson
 III. Prepare and execute Daily Logs/Lesson Plans
Instructional including appropriate, adequate and updated
Competence instructional materials. Prepared and executed 91-100% Daily Lesson Logs/Lesson Plans Should prepare
5
Mode of verification (MOV): including appropriate, adequate and updated instructional materials and execute 81-
Prepared and
a. DLL/Lesson Plan 90% Daily
Prepared and executed 81-90% Daily Lesson Logs/Lesson Plans executed 91-100%
4 Lesson
b. Picture of instructional materials including appropriate, adequate and updated instructional materials Logs/Lesson
Daily Lesson
III. Logs/Lesson Plans
1
June-April 15% Prepared and executed 71-80% Daily Lesson Logs/Lesson Plans
Plans including
including appropriate, 5 5 5 5.00 0.75
3 appropriate,
including appropriate, adequate and updated instructional materials adequate and
adequate and
updated instructional
updated
Prepared and executed 61-70% Daily Lesson Logs/Lesson Plans materials
2 including appropriate, adequate and updated instructional materials instructional
materials
Prepared and executed 60% and below Daily Lesson Logs/Lesson
1 Plans including appropriate, adequate and updated instructional
materials

Attain the required GSA/MPS for grade level

Should attain the required GSA/MPS for grade level and learning area.
and learning area. Mode
of verification (MOV):
91-100% or ___ out of ____ students in Grade 7 and Grade 10
a. Diagnostic and Achievement Test Result 5 English passed at the end of the school year and with
b. Class Record increased of 13% and above MPS. 81%-90% or
c. Grade Sheet ___ out of ____
81-90% or ___ out of ____ students in Grade 7 and Grade 10 students in _____% or ___ out of
4 English passed at the end of the school year and with Grade 8 and ____ students in
Basic increased of 10% - 12% MPS. Grade 9 Grade 8 and Grade 9
Educati III. Mathematics Mathematics passed
2
July-April 15% 71-80% or ___ out of ____ students in Grade 7 and Grade 10 passed at the at the end of the 5 5 5 5.00 0.75
on 3 English passed at the end of the school year and with end of the school school year and with
Policy increased of 7% - 9% and above MPS. year and with increased of 13% and
increased of above MPS.
Service 61-70% or ___ out of ____ students in Grade 7 and Grade 10 10% - 12%
s 2 English passed at the end of the school year and with MPS.
increased of 4% - 6% and above MPS.

60% and below or ___ out of ____ students in Grade 7 and

1 Grade 10 English passed at the end of the school year and
with increased of 3% and below MPS.

Conduct enrichment to above-average/average Should conduct enrichment to above-average/average learners and

learners and remedial classes to students who remedial classes to non-readers/slow learners
will gain less mastered competencies.
Mode of verification (MOV): 5
91-100% or ___ out of ___ identified/listed students were
given enrichment/ remedial classes. Should conduct
enrichment to Conducted
a. Schedule of remediation above- enrichment to above-
conducted b. Assessment Result 4
81-90% or ____ out of ____ identified/listed students were average/average average/average
c. List given enrichment/ remedial classes. learners and learners and remedial
III.
3 of Learners d. July-April 10% remedial classes classes to 81-90% or 4 4 4 4.00 0.40
71-80% or ____ out of ___ identified/listed students were to 71-80% or ___ ___ out of ____
Pictures g. 3 out of ___ identified/listed
given enrichment/ remedial classes.
Certificates/Certification identified/listed students in
students in Mathematics.
61-70% or ____ out of ____identified/listed students were Mathematics.
2
given enrichment/ remedial classes.

60% and below or ____ out of ____identified/listed students

1
were given enrichment/ remedial classes.
 MFO SCORE
Basic Plus Factor 1.) Writer During the Division Workshop on Revision and Finalization of Crafted Daily Lesson Logs (DLLs) on August 21-25, 2017 at A&A Plaza Hotel, Puerto Princesa City, Palawan. 2.) 0.5
Educati (Each item gets . Basa Palaweño-Palawan Reading Inventory and Assessment Writer
on 25 but not to
Policy exceed 1 pt for
Service all the items)
s
TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING ASSESSMENT 4.48
Plus Factor 1 ADJECTIVAL RATING Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating Scale:
Outstanding 4.500 5.000
3.500 4.499
Very Satisfactory 3.499
2.500
Satisfactory 1.500 2.499
Unsatisfactory 1.000 1.499
Poor

ROGER J. CARIO ROSELINE P. VICENTE

Principal II Ratee IOC-ASDS
Rater Approving Officer
 Served in any 4 or
more related tasks
with the full
documentation/artifac
1 ts/action
plan/program of
activities, and
accomplishment
report/certification

Served in any 3
related tasks with the
full
documentation/artifac
0.75 ts/action
plan/program of
activities, and
accomplishment
report/certification

Served in any 2
related tasks with the
full
documentation/artifac
0.5 ts/action
plan/program of
activities, and
accomplishment
report/certification

Served in any 1
related task with the
full
documentation/artifac
0.25 ts/action
plan/program of
activities, and
accomplishment
report/certification
 COMPETENCIES

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES

improve performance. Examples may include doing something better, faster,
Self-Management at alower cost, more efficiently; or improving quality, costumer satisfaction,
morale, without setting any specific goal.
1 Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development. 5

Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and Teamwork
2 4.6
purposive and takes into account personal goals and values congruent 5 1 4
Willingly does his/her share of responsibilty.
to that of the organization.
2 Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal
accomplishment across the organization 4 4.2
3 Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by 5
higher goals
Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through gantt charts, checklists, 3
4 4
Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
4
etc.) to achieve goals.
5 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others 4 4 Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions. 4
5
Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across
Professionalism and Ethics 5
organizations to accomplish organizational goals and objectives.

Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Service Orientation
Conduct and Ethical Standards for public officials and employee (RA 1
1 6713). 4 Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems. 5
2
Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into
2 4.2 Takes personal responsibilty for dealing with and/or correcting costumer 4.4
account the impact of his/her actions and decisions. 4 service issues and concerns 4
Maintains professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of 3 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women
3 4
attendance and punctuality, good grooming and communication. 4 empowerment.
4
Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates & strategies
4 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs.
5 based on DepEd strategies and directions. 5
Acts with a sense pf urgency and responsibility to meet the 5
Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified
5 organization's needs, improves systems and help others improve their
4 procedures that will further enhance service delivery. 4
effectiveness.
Result Focus Innovation
1 Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions.
Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the
1 Fosters new ideas, processes, and suggests bettter ways to do things (cost
time. 4 5
and/or operational efficiency).
2
Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box". Continuously focuses on
2
by placing organizational needs before personal needs. 4 improving personal productivity to create higher value and results. 4
 Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to
standard operating procedures correctly and consistently. Able to
3 produce very satisfactoy quality of work in terms of
usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision
required.
Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste
4 or inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting
goals set.
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates;
CORE SKILLS
Oral Communication
1 Follows instructions accurately.
2 Expresses self clearly, fluently and articulately.
3 Uses appropriate medium for the message.
4 Recommends appropriate and updated technology to enhance productivity
Adjust communication style to others.
5 Guides discussions between and among peers to meet an objective.
Written Communication
Knows the different written business communication formats used in
1 the DepEd.
Writes routine correspondence/communications, narrative and
descriptive report based on ready available information data with
2 minimal spelling or grammatical error/s (e.g. Memos, minutes, etc.)
Secures information from required references (i.e., Directories,
3 schedules, notices, instructions) for specific purposes.
Self-edits words, numbers, phonetic notation and content, if
4 necessary.
3
Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas
4 4.2
or solutions.
4 4
4
Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
organization.
4 4
5 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the
4 ability to succeed with minimal resources. 4
1 - Rarely demonstrates
DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form -Teachers
Computer / ICT Skills
Prepares basic compositions ( e.g., letters, reports, spreadsheets and
1 graphic presentations using Word Processing and Excel. 5
Identifies different computer parts, turns the computer on/off, and work on
4.2 4.2
a given task with acceptable speed and accuracy and connects computer
5 2 peripherals ( e.g., printers, modems, multi-media projectors, etc.) 4
4 3 Prepares simple presentations using Powerpoint. 4
Utilizes technologies to : access information to enhance professional
productivity, assists in conducting research and communicate through local
4 4 and global professional networks. 4
4 5 and professional practice. 4
4
4
4.2
4 OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS
4 CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 4.24
4
 Demonstrates clarity, fluency, impact, conciseness, and effectiveness
5 in his/her written communications. 5 OVERALL RATING 4.24

5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrates

Note: These ratings can be used for the developmental plans of the employee.

DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form - For Teachers

 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives

Employee-Superior Agreement
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.

Name of Employee: AVEGAIL ALARCON CONSTANTINO Name of Superior: ROGER J. CARIO

Signature: Signature:
Date: Date:

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention)
Achieves results with optimal use of Legibly practice time consciousness in all 1. Classroom
time and resources most of the time. professional duties and responsibilities if not all 2. Alarm Clock
Sets personal goals and direction, the time at least most of the time.
June- March
needs and development.
Undertakes personal actions and
behaviors that are clear and purposive
and takes into account personal goals
and values congruent to that of the
organization.
Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage Makes sure that all reports are checked for 1. Laptop
through effective work methods by editing and critiquing with at least 99.9% 2. Organizer
placing organizational needs before accuracy to the immediate head or concerned 3. Drafts
personal needs. person before it is finalized and passed. June- March

Displays emotional maturity and
enthusiasm for and is challenged by
higher goals
Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by Careful filling up of information following the 1. Laptop
conforming to standard operating procedures correctly
and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactoy standard operating procedure of the school 2. Organizer
quality of work in terms of usefulness/acceptability June- March 3. Drafts
and completeness with no supervision required.

Prioritize work tasks and schedules Expresses a desire to do better and may Participate in community forum/fora/ meetings 1. Fund
(through gantt charts, checklists, etc.) express frustration at waste or inefficiency. orientations to clarify stand and issues 2. Classroom
to achieve goals. May focus on new or more precise ways of concerning organizational structures. 3. Sound System
meeting goals set. June- March
4. School
Supplies
Develops and adopts service 1. Attend educational semianars and workships, 1. Fund
improvement programs through reading educational materials regularly. 2. Classroom
simplified procedures that will further 2. Engage in educational 3. Laptop
Sets high quality, challenging, realistic enhance service delivery. research to come up with service improvement 4. School
June- March
goals for self and others in teaching practice. Supplies

Demonstrates clarity, fluency, impact,
conciseness, and effectiveness in
his/her written communications.
Makes specific changes in the system or in own
work methods to improve performance.
Examples may include doing something better,
faster, at alower cost, more efficiently; or
improving quality, costumer satisfaction, morale,
without setting any specific goal.
Plan for possibe activities related to work task and 1. Remediation Worksheets
environment that is highly effective and adaptable 2. Instructional Materials
among students who are challenged in language and
(soft copy/hard copy)
communication through conducting a remediation July- March 3.Classroom
program and other colleagues through support
materials
 To have updated knowledge on teaching 1. Request and or Set for an INSET that will focus 1. School Administrations 2.
strategies and learning materials to on innovative teaching strategies in teaching Division of Palawan 3.
improve performance indicator. language and literature. 2. Approved Seesion Guide on
Provides remediation/enrichment to Reqquest for internet connection to be able to a certain topic highly in
June- March
improve student's performance. research and download innovative and recent demand to the needs of
materials in teaching. teachers

Utilizes technologies to : access information Make use of projector or other technology-based Seek projector and other
to enhance professional productivity, assists resources in teaching learning process. technologies through
Participates in updating of office vision, in conducting research and communicate solicitation or fund raising.
mission, mandates & strategies based through local and global professional June- March
networks.
on DepEd strategies and directions.

HELEN C. CAMIAS ROGER J. CARIO

English Department Chairman Approving Officer
Head Teacher III

DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form -For Teacher |

 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FO
For Master Teachers

Name of Employee : AVEGAIL ALARCON CONSTANTINO

Position : MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division : QUERZON NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Rating Period : 2016-2017
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Weight per PERFORMANCE
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE KRA
30% (Quality, Efficiency

·        Conducted action 5
research related to classroom
problems/concerns within the
rating period, supported with 4

I. Professional the ff. Evidences; Research

Basic Education Policy
Services Growth and I.1 Workshop output, action June-April 10% 3
Development research paper, certificate of
completion, proposed learning
2
interventions, proposed M&E
for results/outcomes
1

4
·         Attended/Participated
I. Professional
Basic Education 4 seminar-workshops/
Growth and I.2 June-April 5%
Policy Services trainings within the rating 3
Development
period.
2

4
·        Received award/
I. Professional recognition in national,
Basic Education
Growth and I.3 region, division, district, June-April 5% 3
Policy Services
Development school level within the
rating period. 2

5
·          Served as
demonstration teacher
within the school year as
I. Professional evidenced by; LP duly
Basic Education
Growth and I.4 signed by the critique June-April 5%
Policy Services
Development panel, pictorials, training
 ·          Served as
demonstration teacher
4
within the school year as
I. Professional evidenced by; LP duly
Basic Education
Growth and I.4 signed by the critique June-April 5% 3
Policy Services
Development panel, pictorials, training
matrix, certificate of 2
recognition, attendance
sheet 1

Weight per PERFORMANCE

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE KRA
35% (Quality, Efficiency

4
·         Handled 360 minutes
of actual teaching loads as
Basic Education II. Instructional
II.1 reflected in the class June-April 15% 3
Policy Services Competence
program of activities and
SF7. 2

4
·          Increased
Basic Education II. Instructional
II.2 achievement test by 5% June-April 10% 3
Services Competence
over baseline test results.
2

·          Increased the

number of instructional &
Basic Education II. Instructional July and
II.2 independent readers in the 5% 3
Services Competence February
posttest from the pretest by
50%.
2

1
 5

·      Attained 75% of the

Basic Education II. Instructional required learning
II.3 July-April 5% 3
Services Competence competencies in a given
period of time.
2

Weight per PERFORMANCE

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE KRA
30% (Quality, Efficiency

Conducted
III. Support to
Basic Education mentoring/coaching to 4
Instructional III.1 June-April 10%
Policy Services teachers in the 3
Supervision
school/cluster/line.

Managed/Monitored 5
III. Support to teachers in the
Basic Education
Instructional III.2 implementation of the July-April 10% 3
Policy Services
Supervision RPMS cycle within the
rating period.

2
 Supervision RPMS cycle within the
rating period.

4
III. Support to Checked daily Lesson
Basic Education
Instructional III.3 Plans/Journals/Log book June-April 10% 3
Policy Services
Supervision to 5 teachers.
2

Weight per PERFORMANCE

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE KRA
5% (Quality, Efficiency

Participated 4
Basic Education IV. Community events/activities in the
IV.1 June-April 2% 3
Policy Services Involvement community within the
rating period.

Conducted periodic PTA meetings/ 5

conferences at least once every
grading period with accomplished
indicators, such as attendance 4
sheet, agenda of the meeting,
Basic Education IV. Community
IV.2 minutes of the meeting, pictorials, June-April 3% 3
Policy Services Involvement narrative report.
2

4
Maintained harmonious
Basic Education IV. Community relationship with superiors,
IV.3 June-April 10% 3
Policy Services Involvement students, local and public
officials and co-teachers.
2
 Maintained harmonious
Basic Education IV. Community relationship with superiors,
IV.3 June-April 10%
Policy Services Involvement students, local and public
officials and co-teachers.

Weight per PERFORMANCE

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE KRA
5% (Quality, Efficiency

* Officership to Professional 1.5

Organizations
Basic Education *Region-2
Plus Factor * Division-1.5 June-April 1
Policy Services *
District/Municipal-1.0 0.5
* School -.5

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned.

ROGER J. CARIO AVEGAIL ALARCON CONSTANTIN

Principal II Ratee
Rater
NT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
hers

Name of Rater: ROSELINE P. VICENTE

Position: HEAD TEACHER III
Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING SCORE
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave.

Has 5 of the identified indicators.

Has 4 of the identified indicators.

Has 3 of the identified indicators. 2 2 4 2 2 0.2

Has 2 of the identified indicators.

Has 1 or none of the identified

indicators.

Participated at least 4 or more

seminar-workshops/trainings
within the rating period.
Participated at least 3 seminar-
workshops/trainings within the
rating period.
Participated at least 2 seminar-
workshops/trainings within the 5 5.00 10 5 5 0.25
rating period.
Participated at least 1 seminar-
workshop/training within the rating
period.
No seminar-workshops/trainings
attended.

Received award/recognition in national level

within the rating period.

Received award/recognition in Regional level

within the rating period.

Received award/recognition in division level

within the rating period. 2 2 4 2 2 0.1
Received award/recognition in district level
within the rating period.

Received award/recognition in school level

within the rating period.

Has 5 of the identified indicators.

2 2 4 2 2 0.1
 Has 4 of the identified indicators.

Has 3 of the identified indicators. 2 2 4 2 2 0.1

Has 2 of the identified indicators.

Has 1 or none of the identified

indicators.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING SCORE
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave.

Has 360 or more minutes of actual

teaching loads

Has 350-359 minutes of actual

teaching loads

Has 340-349 minutes of actual

teaching loads 5 5 10 5 5 0.75
Has 330-339 minutes of actual
teaching loads

Has 329 or less minutes of actual

teaching loads

Increased achievement test by 5%

or more over baseline test.

Increased achievement test by 4%

or more over baseline test.

Increased achievement test by 3%

or more over baseline test. 3 3 6 3 3 0.3
Increased achievement test by 2%
or more over baseline test.

Increased achievement test by 1%

or less over baseline test.

Increased instructional and

independent readers by 50% or
more in the posttest .

Increased instructional and

independent readers by 40-49% in
the posttest .

Increased instructional and

independent readers by30-39% in 5 5 10 5 5 0.25
the posttest .

Increased instructional and

independent readers by 20-29% or
more in the posttest .

Increased instructional and

independent readers by 19% or less
in the posttest .
 Attained 75% and above required
competencies in a given period of
time.

Attained 70-74% required

competencies in a given period of
time.

Attained 65-69-% required

competencies in a given period of 4 4 8 4 4 0.2
time.

Attained 60-64% required

competencies in a given period of
time.

Attained 59% and below required

competencies in a given period of
time.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING SCORE
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave.

Conducted mentoring/coaching to
4 or more teachers in the
school/cluster/line.

Conducted mentoring/coaching to
3 teachers in the
school/cluster/line.

Conducted mentoring/coaching to 4 4 8 4 4 0.4

2 teachers in the
school/cluster/line.

Conducted mentoring/coaching to
1 teacher in the school/cluster/line.

No teacher conducted
mentoring/coaching.

Managed/Monitored 5 or more
teachers in the implementation of
the RPMS cycle.

Managed/Monitored 4 teachers in
the mplementation of the RPMS
cycle.

Managed/Monitored 3 teachers in
the mplementation of the RPMS 2 2 4 2 2 0.2
cycle.

Managed/Monitored 2 teachers in
the implementation of the RPMS
cycle.
 Managed/Monitored 1 or none
teacher in the implementation of
the RPMS cycle.

Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book

to 5 or more teachers
Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book
to 4 teachers.
Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book
to 3 teachers. 5 5 10 5 5 0.5
Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book
to 2 teachers.
Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book
to 1 or none teacher.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING SCORE
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave.

Participated 4 or more
events/activities in the community
within the rating period.

Participated 3 events/activities in
the community within the rating
period.

Participated 2 or more
events/activities in the community 5 5 10 5 5 0.1
within the rating period.

Participated 1 or more
events/activities in the community
within the rating period.

No participated events/activities in
the community within the rating
period.

Has 5 of the identified indicators.

Has 4 of the identified indicators.

Has 3 of the identified indicators. 5 5 10 5 5 0.15

Has 2 of the identified indicators.

Has 1 or none of the identified

indicators.

Has 5 of the identified indicators.

Has 4 of the identified indicators.

Has 3 of the identified indicators. 4 4 8 4 4 0.4

Has 2 of the identified indicators.

 4 4 8 4 4 0.4

Has 1 or none of the identified

indicators.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING SCORE
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave.
Regional officership with full
documentation

Division officership with partial

documentation

District officership without

documentation

School o fficership without

documentation

No initiated officership.

OVERALL RATING FOR VERY

ACCOMPLISHMENTS SATISFAC-
53.5 4.4 TORY

L ALARCON CONSTANTINO ROSELINE P. VICENTE

Ratee IOC-ASDS
Approving Officer