Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Finance management
1
3. Some Main Examples for Agency Relationship
Problems
1. Agency Cost:
Salary and incentives are the fundamental motivators according to the motivational
theories of management. Every manager would prefer to achieve his/her own
personal objectives by getting more incentives and other benefits from the firm. Also
they may tend to use luxury cars and private vehicles from company’s wealth. This
kind of unnecessary expenses also can be considered as an agency relationship
problem of a company.
According to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Theory Job security is one of the main
needs of an employee apart from his physiological needs. Nobody will like to
undertake risky investments since those may lead them towards uncertainty of their
own jobs. But the perception of shareholders is something different. They would like
to maximize their wealth. To maximize shareholder’s wealth, it is essential to
undertake some projects those can provide a fair amount of outcome. But the risk of
project is positively proportional to the profit of the project. So it is unavoidable to
undertake high risk in order to earn high profit. So the unwillingness of the
managers to take high risk ventures may seems to be a barrier in maximizing
shareholder wealth. So this will create conflicts between both parties.
2
4. Agency Relationship problems of (CAO) China
Aviations Oil Singapore
In the context of the agency relationship problem of China Aviation Oil Singapore
limited is a more challenging one to explain. Normally in usual conditions agency
problems arise between shareholders and appointed managers. The reason is, in fact
the shareholders or directors does not involve in the management task of the
company instead they appoints mangers to under take the work on behalf of them,
giving the authority of make decisions. Therefore some managers take these
privileges as an added advantage and make decisions that work in favor for there
benefits. Under these conditions through the offer of share options to the mangers as
part of there remuneration, shareholders attempts to align there goals and managers
goals as whole.
In this case, the agency problems of China Aviation Oil (CAO) Singapore lead the
company to its collapse. Actually speaking reason for it is managements improper
planning and unsuccessful decisions are seen as been some of the pointed issues.
The China Aviations Oil Holdings which is the parent and the largest shareholder and
creditor of the China Aviations Singapore had supplied six of China Aviations nine
directors including those who are accused for the security violations, Chen Julin
China Aviations former chief executive and Jia Changbin president, and also Gu
Yanfei chairmen of the parent China Aviations Oil Holdings (CAOH).
Studies found the fundamentals for the collapse of the CAO was occured due to the,
too much intervention of the chairmen’s and presidents in to the Managerial
activities. The reason for this was CAOH holds the most shares of CAO Singapore
hence less value for other shareholders in selecting new directors, because one
major shareholder is dominating the voting power and influences in choosing the
directors who they want and its not a compromise decisions of all the shareholders, a
good example was the six of nine directors were appointed by the CAOH. Because
they had the major shares hence dominating selection power.
The second problem is management was given less opportunity to carry out there
work according to the circumstances. Since the intrusion from the Chairman and
president’s professional managers might not had the opportunity to implement thing
as they want, because the views from the both parties, the manager and president
may defer finally the superior power wins. As per the report from the
Therefore the agency problem in the CAO has stimulated to a certain extend and
resulted to its collapse, the main reason for it were the intervention of chairman and
president in the management. Therefore it should be given more consideration.
3
5. Solutions for Agency Relationship Problems
Shareholders may closely monitor the activities of the managers through various
ways in order to ensure the proper functioning of a manager. For this shareholder’s
may request managers to provide reports annually and can check whether the
managers are functioning align or not with the interests of shareholders. Theses
reports may check through an employed auditor of the firm. The auditors are
requested to express an opinion on the financial reports to shareholders at the
annual general meeting of the firm. The cost spent to check the activities of
managers would called as ‘monitoring cost’.
Not only providing remuneration packages to managers but also it is required to link
their remuneration needs with the maximization of shareholder wealth. Shareholders
are doing this by providing some special share options to managers.
4
Q 2 .1 Investment Appraisal Methods
When the Business finds a new opening or a new investment; it is natural to feel a
managerial urge to acquire the particular investment in order to grow well in
business.
But it’s the ultimate responsibility of the financial manager to analyze the project and
decide whether it’s profitable or not to undertake the particular project.
FV – Future Value
r - Discount rate (rate of interest)
n - Number of Terms
PV = FV x 1
(1+ r) n
Adding value for the product is one of the ways to achieve high degree of customer
satisfaction. Researches on total quality management (TQM) and some other management
studies are emphasizing the importance of value adding functions; a business has to adopt in
order to compete successfully in a rapidly growing business world. Net present value is the
method of determining the value that has been added by the business to the particular
investment.
Definition of NPV
The Net Present Value (NPV) of a project or investment can be defined as “The sum of the
present values of the annual cash flows – initial investment.”
5
Steps to follow when Calculating the NPV of an Investment
1. Identify the time range and size of the expected future cash flows generated by
the project/investment
2. Determine the discount rate or the estimated rate of return for the project
3. Calculate the NPV using the equations
1 $ 20000
2 $ 30000
3 $ 40000
4 $ 50000
0 1 2 3 4
6
Present values for every year can be calculated through the following
method
Amount n Discount PV
Factor
NPV 7150
The value of NPV is $7150 it is positive. This means that the investment is returning
more then the desired interest rate of return of 10% per year.
Advantages Of NPV
Disadvantages Of NPV
1. identifying the exact discount rate is difficult
2. the decision criteria must be specified before undertaking appraisal through
this method.
7
2. Discounted Payback Method
The discounted payback period can be defined as “The length of time required to
recover the initial cash outflow from the discounted future cash inflows.” Or it can be
said as the length of time until the sum of the discounted cash flows is equal to the
initial investment.
1 $ 20000
2 $ 30000
3 $ 40000
4 $ 50000
8
After remaining 2 years = 60000 – 42960
=` 17040
Advantages
Disadvantages
9
4. Average Accounting Return (AAR)
Average Accounting Rate of Return can be defined as “A measure of the return on an
investment over a given period, equal to average projected earnings minus taxes,
divided by average book value over the duration of the investment.” This can be
denominated through the following formula also.
Investment Criteria:
10
Average Net Income = $56 250 + $56 250 + $101 250 + $ 116 250
4
= $82 500.
Advantages
Disadvantages
11
4. The Internal Rate of return (IRR)
The IRR is the annualized effective compounded return rate which can be earned on
the invested capital. This method is a most important alternative for NPV.
IRR Rule:
If IRR > Required Return - Project can be accepted
If IRR < Required Return – Project cannot be accepted
Case study
Year Cash flows
0 $ 10000
1 $ 3000
2 $ 2000
3 $ 1000
We have to calculate the IRR?
If the required return is 15% is it wise to accept the project?
10000 o 1 (10000)
NPV 9676
12
When the NPV is at 20%
10000 o 1 (10000)
NPV 9465
= 5.5055%
Since we require a 15% return in investment, the above project is not accepted.
Disadvantages
1. Since this method is reporting on terms of percentage, it ignores the
difference in project magnitude and so is unreliable when evaluating project
of great different in sizes.
2. This method cannot be viewed upon to give correct advice for mutually
exclusive investment decisions.
13
3. Decision rule breakdown for multiple IRR
Reference :
14