You are on page 1of 2

Title III Title IV

33.A, a lady professor, was giving an 1. Enumerate the Crimes against


examination. She noticed B, one of the Public Interest
students, cheating. She called the student’s
Article 161. Counterfeiting the great seal of
attention and confiscated his examination
the Government of the Philippines, forging
booklet, causing embarrassment to him.
the signature or stamp of the Chief
The following day, while the class was
Executive
going on, the student, B, approached A and,
without any warning, slapped her. B would Article 162. Using forged signature or
have inflicted further injuries on A had not counterfeiting seal or stamp
C, another student, come to A’s rescue and
prevented B from continuing his attack. B Article 163. Making and importing and
turned his ire on C and punched the latter. uttering false coins
What crime or crimes, if any, did B Article 164. Mutilation of coins,
commit? Why? importation and uttering of
Suggested answer: mutilated coins

B, is liable for two counts of direct assault. Article 165. Selling of false or mutilated
First, when he slapped A, who is a person coins, without connivance
in authority expressly mentioned in Article Article 166. Forging treasury or bank
152 of the Revised Penal Code, who was in notes or other documents payable to
the performance of her duties on the day of
bearer, importing and uttering of
the commission of the assault. Second,
such false or forged notes and
when he repeatedly punched C, who
became an agent of the person in authority documents
when he came to the aid of a person in Article 167. Counterfeiting, importing and
authority, A, a lady professor (Celig v. uttering instruments not payable to
People, GR No. 173150, July 28, 2010).
bearer
The elements of Direct Assault are: Article 168. Illegal possession and use of
(a) that the accused makes an attack, forged treasury or bank notes and
employs force, makes a serious other instruments of credit
intimidation or a serious resistance;
(b) that the person assaulted is a person in Article 170. Falsification of legislative
authority or his agent; documents
(c) that at the time of the assault the person
in authority or his agent is engaged in the Article 171. Falsification by public officer,
performance of his official duties or that the employee or notary
assault was on the occasion of the Article 172. Falsification by private
performance of his official duties;
individuals and use of falsified
(d) that the accused knows that the person
documents
he is assaulting is a person in authority or
his agent in the exercise of his duties; and Article 173. Falsification of wireless,
(e) that there is no public uprising. cable, telegraph and telephone messages
and use of said falsified messages
Article 174. False medical certificates,
false certificates of merit or service
Article 175. Using false certificates
Article 176. Manufacturing and possession
of instruments or implements for
falsification
Article 177. Usurpation of authority or
official functions
Article 178. Using fictitious name and
concealing true name
Article 179. Illegal use of uniforms or
insignia
Article 180. False testimony against a
defendant
Article 181. False testimony favourable to
the defendant
Article 182. False testimony in civil cases
Article 183. False testimony in other cases
and perjury
Article 184. Offering false testimony in
evidence
Article 185. Machinations in public auction
Article 186. Monopolies and combinations
in restraint of trade
Article 187. Importation and disposition of
falsely marked articles or
merchandise made of gold, silver, or
other precious metals or their alloys

2. Presumption of Falsification
Falsification of documents under
paragraph 1, Article 172 are:
1) the offender is a private
individual or a public officer or
employee who did not take
advantage of his official position;
2) the offender committed any of
the acts of falsification enumerated
in Article 171 and
3) the falsification was committed
in a public or official or commercial
document

You might also like