Robert B. Sklaroff, M.D., F.A.C.P.

Medical Oncology/Hematology  Telephone: (215) 333-4900

 Facsimile: (215) 333-2023
Smylie Times Building - Suite #500-C
8001 Roosevelt Boulevard  rsklaroff@gmail.com
Philadelphia, PA 19152
May 9, 2018

To: Informed-Consent – Follow-Up – V [absolutely last-gasp]

Re: Dean H. Malik, Esquire – [https://www.scribd.com/document/378719049/Malik-Follow-Up-V]

For those yearning for a one-page summary of the GOP-Primary in CD-1, note that this mop-up report of
what has/hasn’t occurred this week builds upon prior data: “History” [subjective]; “Physical” [objective];
“Assessment”; “Plan”; initial and subsequent follow-ups; an op-ed [composed by moi, noting that the
editor wished colorful-puns be removed from an earlier draft thereof]; an article about the debate; and a
“last-gasp” synthesis of what had occurred longitudinally. On the basis of these data, it was found that
Brother Brian merits support and—perhaps prescient of both the local/national forces-at-play—an op-ed
by J.D. Mullane [paralleling comments he made instantly/orally after the debate] simply concluded that:
A divided Republican Party needs MAGA hats to win. This comment seemed to have been directed
primarily @ Brother Brian; more in-depth discussion was provided below [1]—my op-ed, [2]—the article
about the debate, and [3]—Mullane’s essay. Jettisoned were residual/documented “issues” with Malik’s
campaign-leadership, particularly noting that his speech @ the NAAC only attracted ~40 souls last night.
Notwithstanding lit-drops and customary conflicts with the placement of signs, it seems it’s “game over.”
{I’m told that Dean is internally-polling @ < 10%, although I’m not @ liberty to reveal the source.}

Of the 100+ recipients of these memos (mostly culled from lists that were felt to constitute most of the
Constitutional Conservative activists in Bucks County), one requested deletion of distribution because they
allegedly constituted Malik-bashing. Undermining that attack is a letter (by Paul Salvatore, Newtown)
published in the Courier Times today (which suggests that, if anything, Fitz wasn’t sufficiently praised):

Recently, Dr. Robert B. Sklaroff sent a letter to the newspaper titled, “Handicapping the
GOP debate.” He pointed out several differences between the congressional candidates
and indicated where Dean Malik would’ve been a different vote from Congressman Brian
Fitzpatrick on a particular issue. I always remember the saying, “it’s easy to be a Monday
morning quarterback,” and that’s just exactly what the good doctor was doing.
I noticed that he forgot to mention that Fitzpatrick supported the president on tax reform
legislation. My family now enjoys additional $400 dollars a month to help cover our bills,
and that is a big deal.
I’ve heard Fitzpatrick state that he represents everyone, not just conservative
Republicans. I find that there are people who are on the far left and the far right, but most
of us sit somewhere in the middle, the area I called the common-sense area.
I am tired of people going to Washington and creating a deadlock where nothing gets
done. Many Americans voted for President Trump because we were tired of that, and it
was many Democrats voting for Trump that put him in office.
So I get a little upset when I hear candidates saying they are more Republican than the
person they are running against. I want to send somebody to Washington who
understands the core values of Republicanism: a smaller government, less intrusion in our
lives and a willingness to get something done.