Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Phase I (2001-2005)
December 2006
104.Bang.204.DAC
_____________
(file number)
1. BASIC PROGRAMME/PROJECT DATA
Country: Bangladesh
Name of programme: Human Rights and Good Governance Programme
Budget account number2 6.32.02.11
UMF account number: 501.2041
Purpose code3: 15063
Programme period: (planned) 2001-2005 (actual)
2002 – 2005
Total Danida contribution (DKK, planned) 48,78 mio (DKK, actual) 32,87
Date of agreement: 12. 09. 2001
Date of programme end: 31.12.2005
Programme manager: Lars Iskjær ( 15.05.02 - 15.05.05)
Shireen Huq (15.05.05 - 08.10.05)
Hans Hoffmeyer (08.10.05 - 31.12.05)
All national partner organisations
(incl. local government):
1. BLAST (Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust)
2. BRCT (Bangladesh Rehabilitation Centre for Trauma Victims )
3. MLAA (Madaripur Legal Aid Association)
4. WAVE Foundation and Governance Coalition
5. DemocracyWatch
6. BSEHR (Bangladesh Society for the Enforcement of Human Rights)
7. MMC (Mass-line Media Centre )
8. BCDJC (Bangladesh Centre for Development Journalism and Communication )
9. NN (News Network )
10.PIB (Press Institute of Bangladesh )
11.BSS (Bangladesh Sangbad Sangstha)
12.RU (Department of Mass Communicaton, University of Rajshahi)
13. BS (Banchte Shekha)
14.NUK (Nari Uddug Kendra )
15.Shushilan
16.Rights Jessore
17.Naripokkho
18. BSAF (Bangladesh Shishu Adhikar Forum )
19.TDC (Tripartite Development Council )
1 Programme and Project Completion Reports are prepared for sector programme support and other programme and
project activities, where the Danida contribution is exceeding DKK 5 million.
2 Budget account number is ‘finanslovskonto’ in Danish.
3 The five-digit purpose code specifies the DAC code.
Funding modalities:(for example Danida separate, basket or other joint financing arrangement, budget
support)
30 out of a total of 33 projects have been financed entirely by Danida through the Programme
Grant and implemented by a total of 28 different NGOs. Only 3 projects have been co-
financed with other donors (Norad, DFID, Novib and Christian Aid) through basket fund
arrangements.
The original programme period was envisaged to be five years (2001-2005), however the
Programme Support Unit (PSU) for the day to day management of the programme was not
established before October 2001, and the Adviser, Head of the Unit, was not fielded until
May 2002. Therefore PSU became fully staffed and operational in early 2003. These delays
hampered programme implementation.
Especially during the first year of the programme, Local Grant Authority (LGA) financed
projects were used to kick off the programme while awaiting the formal approval and the
signing of GOB agreement concerning the Programme Grant .While 25.57 mio. DKK from
the Programme Grant was used to finance 31 projects, 26.2 mio. DKK from LGA funds
have been used to finance 20 projects. This means that PSU was in charge of the supervision
and follow up on a total of 51 projects financed through two different funding mechanisms
with a total budget of 51.77 mio. DKK.. Thus, the extensive use of LGA funds as well as
the Programme Grant, has contributed to the under expenditure of the latter.
Besides, funds had been reserved for support to governmental guardian institutions, such as
Ombudsman , Anti Corruption Commission and Human Rights Commission. However none
of these institutions materialized, and the earmarked funds were later re-allocated to NGO’s.
However, many of the NGO partners were organizationally quite weak and had limited
capacity to plan, implement and monitor projects. The combination of the partners’ low
absorption and implementation capacity and the delays in obtaining NGO Affairs Bureau’s
clearance in accessing fund hampered implementation of some planned activities.
Finally, in spite of the delayed starting up of the programme which led to only three years of
effective implementation, and the fact that the implementation periods for 16 of the 33
approved projects financed by the Programme Grant were designed to go beyond 31.12.05, it
was decided to maintain the originally defined programme period. This was because it was
assessed to be important to develop a new and stronger programme frame which was more
focused, with a view to facilitate management and monitoring. Thus this also contributed to
the unspent funds.
The overall disbursement level in relation to approved budget is 64,2%, but a breakdown on
“focus area” level shows significant differences. Thus it is almost 100% in “focus area” 3
(Women and justice) and only 42% in “focus area” 4 (Child protection) and 46 % in “focus
area” 4 (indigenous peoples).”Focus area” 1 and 2 are close to average. These variations are
on one hand reflecting the complementary use of LGA funds, and on the other hand,
disproportions might be caused by the fact, that development of the programme portfolio has
been principally demand driven.
In order to understand the context and scope of the present report it is necessary to give a
brief explanation of the overall structure of the programme.
The HRGG Programme in Bangladesh has in its first phase not been a consistent programme
in a normal sense, since it was rather an umbrella covering existing commitments and planned
new interventions, along with project ideas within a common strategic framework defined by
4 programme level objectives and 7 focus areas, all related to 4 fundamental human rights
issues: (1) Rule of Law, (2) Civil Rights, (3) Women Rights and (4) Child Rights.
The use of 3 different funding mechanisms (Danida Board approvals of individual projects
(JATI,VAW,UCEP), Programme Grant and Local Authority Grants) imply different
reporting mechanisms, and the scope of the present report will be the Programme Grant
only, since other projects within the framework of the programme are being reported on
individually.
No objectives have been defined in relation to the 7 focus areas so they are not components
in a traditional sense, rather they describe broad problem areas. However projects within
these focus areas should relate to one or more of the 4 overall programme level objectives.
In the following, main activities as per focus area and projects is briefly described. In order to
show the significance of the support, the period and the Danida contribution (Programme
grant) is included.
BLAST : Access to Justice for Realisation of HR and Advocacy for Empowerment of the poor
Danida Contribution: 949,705 DKK Period: April 2003 – December 2005
Provision of legal aid to poor population groups through legal services. Advocacy activities with the
aim of having an impact at the national policy level for protection of human rights.
DemocracyWatch: People’s Reporting Centre for Building local monitoring system for
strengthening Local Governments
Danida Contribution: 1,968,988 DKK Period: October 2003 - September 2005.
Establishment of local monitoring system for strengthening the local government institutions (Union
Parishad), including Local Citizen Committees. Monitoring and appraisal activities in relation to the
performance of the elected representatives and the local service providing institutions.
BRCT: Rapid Response Psychological Support Service for Victims of Torture & Organised Violence
Danida Contribution: 420,829 DKK Period: July 2003 - June 2004.
WAVE Strengthening Local Governance through Participatory and Responsive Public Services
Danida Contribution: 1,940,134 DKK Period: November 2004 - December 2005.
Activities to ensure accountability and responsiveness of local government institutions in the south-
western and northern parts of the country. Training of 32 local NGOs
Rights Jessore: Combating Women and Children Trafficking at Greater Jessore District through
NGOs
Danida Contribution: 360,44 DKK Period: March 2003 - February 2005
Naripokkho Consolidating the National Platform for the Women’s Movement: Doorbar
Danida Contribution: 1,116,610 DKK. Period: January 2004 – December 2006
Institutional Strengthening of the Network, enhancing the capacity of network members to deal with
Violence Against Women; capacity building of network members for Political Empowerment; and,
decentralisation of network management.
CDP Situation Analysis on Child Rights in the Shrimp Sector in the South-West Region of
Bangladesh
Danida contribution: 68,495 DKK Period: September 2005 – December 2005
The study explored and analyzed the extent of child rights violations in the shrimp industry and
recommend interventions.
Dipshika Awareness Building on Human Rights and Good Governance among the Adivasi
communities
Danida Contribution: 442,987 DK Period: October 2004 - December 2005
Awareness building and human rights promotion among the Uraw community of northern part.
CIPRAD:Development Discourse Perspective Government and NGOs programme for Plain Land
IPs
Danida Contribution: 175,573 DKK Period: January 2005-June 2005
Documentation of opinions, viewpoints, development interventions of Government, NGOs and aid
institutions - on plain land Indigenous Peoples in Bangladesh. Strengthening policy recommendations
an dialogues on Plain Land Indigenous Peoples in Bangladesh
1. Improved awareness and respect for civil and legal rights in government institutions,
including the judiciary
2. Improved accountability, transparency and effectiveness of public administration.
3. Promotion of freedom of expression and public awareness of human rights and good
governance.
4. Strengthened civil society organisations.
The project level objectives should be aligned with at least one of the above mentioned
programme level objectives (P.O.), which imply that there is no objectives as per focus
area. The following chart show how the project level objectives contributes to the
fulfilment of the programme level objectives. In order to somehow appreciate the
“weight” of the objectives, disbursement figures as well as months of duration of the
project are included in the chart.
No outputs have been established beforehand for the 4 objectives. However, the
following 14 activity categories identified retrospectively through the systematization of
results, can somehow compensate for the lack of defined outputs at programme level.
In the following, the principal results of these activities will be reported, and finally
evaluated in relation to the programme level objectives.
PO-2
Increasing people’s participation in public affairs including monitoring of public
service delivery and the performance of elected representatives (Democracy
Watch, WAVE, MLAA)
Training of members of elected bodies and local government personnel ( WAVE,
MLAA)
PO-3
Public HRGG awareness building through NGOs
(Naripokkho, MLAA, AUS, BAF, RJ, BSF,CDP, IPDS)
Public HRGG awareness building through press (MCC, NN, DemWatch, RJ, IPDS )
Promotion of Human Rights and Good Governance through awareness raising and
improvement of professional skill of journalists. (RU, BCDJC, MCC, PIB)
Promotion of freedom of expression (BCDJC)
PO-4
Alternative Dispute Resolutions (ADR) based on traditional community institutions.
(MLAA, Shushilan, Banchte Shekka,)
Organizational support and capacity building of civil society organisation representing
HR-vulnerable groups, especially children, women and indigenous peoples.
Grass roots: Democracy Watch,
Women: Naripokkho, Banchte Shekka,
Children: BSAF, TDC, DNS, Barcik
Indigenous Peoples Taungya, AUS, BAF, IPDS,
Dipshikha
Support to NGO based service delivery for children (RJ, BRCT, TDC, DNS)
Capacity building of implementing NGOs (BLAST, MLAA, Shushilan, BS, BSEHR,
Naripokkho, BASF, AUS)
In the following the level completion of the objectives will be analyzed on the basis of
the defined outputs:
PO-I
Improved awareness and respect for civil and legal rights in government
institutions, including the judiciary
On the one hand (1) disadvantaged groups in civil society have received support in order
to improve their access to justice, including initiatives of awareness raising related to
rights of specific HR-vulnerable groups (demand side), and on the other hand (2) public
institutions (supply side) have been directly targeted in some capacity building activities.
Finally (3) advocacy initiatives oriented toward legal reforms, including Public Interest
Litigation, have been supported in order to improve the respect for civil rights.
The following results have been produced through the supported activities
Demand side:
Free legal aid for disadvantaged people
9.521 cases have been settled with support and legal assistance from two NGOs (7.421
BLAST, 2.100 MLAA)
BLAST reports that 73% of their cases (5.414) were disposed of positively for the
clients, and since 80% of complainants were women, it might be deduced, that the
legal aid especially has improved women’s access to justice and increased the
respect of women’s rights.
This work included a significant number of follow up meetings with the clients,
lawyers and law enforcing agencies.
Awareness raising within public institutions, related to rights of specific HR-
vulnerable groups
Women Rights:
1 round table discussion with the parliament members of Bangladesh
39 round table discussions in 39 districts with political leaders.
(Naripokkho)
22 dialogue meetings with GOB agencies at the Upazila level,
5 sharing sessions on women and social justice with GOB agencies at district
level
22 dialogue meetings on women’s rights, human rights and social justice with
different stakeholders and
42 dialogue meetings with Union Parishads.
(Banchte Shekha)
6 Child rights consultation meetings at district level
6 Dialogues concerning child rights with locally elected bodies in 6 districts
1 Roundtable concerning child rights meeting with MPs and policy makers
(BSAF)
Indigenous Peoples rights:
A Study containing a systematic documentation of key stakeholder’ viewpoints on
development interventions for the Plain Lands Indigenous Peoples has been
completed. Special focus dedicated to those undertaken by Government (Special
Affairs Division).The study brought out policy recommendations for better,
effective and participatory development programmes with the Indigenous Peoples
and the strengthening of policy dialogues between Indigenous communities and
the duty bearers. (CIPRAD)
248 locally elected bodies (LEB) have received training and awareness building
regarding trafficking of women and children, through 12 one-day courses.
Authorities from India and Bangladesh have met to discuss and coordinate action
against Women and Child Trafficking. (Rights Jessore)
PO-2
Improved accountability, transparency and effectiveness of public administration.
This objective have been pursued from both the demand side (right holders) and the
supply side (duty bearers) through, increased popular participation, awareness raising,
monitoring and training activities.
Demand side:
Increased Peoples Participation in public affairs including monitoring of
public service delivery and the performance of elected representatives
UP representatives, local GOB officials, local elites, CBO members have been sensitized
on Present scenario of AC, VC and Mediation Process through:
266 Follow-up meetings organized
16 Thana workshops organized
153 Union level meetings organized
7096 Courtyard meetings organized
(MLAA)
PO-3
Promotion of freedom of expression and public awareness of human rights and
good governance.
4 International Women’s Day and International Day for protesting Violence Against
Women’s Day have been observed.
1 Human Chain to protest the proposed revision of Women’s Development Policy
has been organized (Naripokkho)
129 workshops and 24 Courses organized on Gender & Development conducted with
women leaders and animators (MLAA)
The Indigenous Peoples International day has been celebrated and used for
advocacy and awareness raising activities.(AUS)
5.000 indigenous gathered to celebrate the Decade of the Indigenous Peoples and
International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples (BAF-1)
20473 students, 790 teachers, 130 imams and 510 social leaders have increased awareness
about the trafficking issue, through the organization of 48 rallies, 45 school
campaigns, 48 one-day meeting with imam and social leaders.
37,000 (apporx.) grassroots people have reached increased awareness about the
1 web based HRGG library has been designed and implemented to support journalist’s
fact finding work, and to spread worldwide information on HRGG situation in
Bangladesh.
90 female journalists have received 6 monthly on-job training related to the web library.
(NN)
918 reports on human rights (295), gender (65) and democracy and development (558)
published in local and national newspapers (MCC)
700 reports on HRGG have been published in local and national media, meaning that
people in general have increased awareness of their civic rights, due to increased
coverage of HRGG issues in local press(Democracy Watch)
55 trafficked victims have been identified through fact finding through daily newspapers
(Rights Jessore)
The understanding of issues related to Indigenous Peoples rights has been increased
among majority communities at local and national level, through media advocacy
activities and reports published in local and national newspaper (case: the struggle of
Khasi people) (IPDS)
Pilot diploma for university course on Civic Journalism formulated and implemented
The Department of Mass Communication (DoMC) in Rajshahi University
Educational materials and guideline have been developed and approved by the Academic
sub-committee
40 student have initiated the course (RU)
397 female journalist students have attended in the 16 workshops
20 women journalists have completed an advanced training program with specialized
follow-up
PO-4
Strengthened civil society organisations.
The support to strengthening civil society organizations has had three directions.:
On the one hand, NGOs has been addressed in their function as compensation for
missing or inadequate service delivery from the public sector. This has been the case for
street children, victims of human rights violations and poor people with very limited
access to claim redress through the formal judicial system. In all these cases alternative
civil society based solutions have been promoted.
On the other hand, NGOs have been strengthened in their role as representatives of
HR-vulnerable groups, especially women, children and indigenous peoples, who can
raise their voice and defend their rights through dialogue, information campaigns,
advocacy etc.
Finally, the implementing institutions have in many cases themselves been strengthened
through capacity building facilitated by the projects. Several of these NGOs do not really
have a representative mandate, but some have a kind of watchdog function in relation to
human rights.
10.173 disputes resolved through ADR (7.862 at Union level and 2.311 at Thana level)
68 courses held regarding ADR related issues.
200 workshops conducted on Mediation & Law with WARD CBO
members
888 ward committees and99 Union Committees formed
3609 meetings organized with Ward CBO members
355 meetings organized with Union CBO members
(MLAA)
1174 disputes handled through ADR (60% of disputes resolved effectively)
115 court cases handled (31 cases finalised with verdicts in favour of Shushilan client, 18
dismissed and 66 pending)
UPs are referring disputes to ADR Committees
108 wards and 12 unions have established ADR Committees
5,700 (approx.) have participated in seminars, workshops and courtyard meetings
300 grassroots women leaders are involved in ADR Women Networks
589 women group members have participated in training programme
(Shushilan)
986 ADR committee members and 326 paralegals trained in family laws and
ADR techniques and management.
Community peoples have been voicing their demands, and grassroots level leaders have
become more responsive through:
22 public meetings
240 court yard meetings
108 orientation meetings
32 seminars
24 spot campaigns, 24 documentary shows
(Democracy Watch)
Women’s organisations have been trained to sharpen analysis of problems and strategies
on key issues as violence against women and women’s political empowerment and to
enable more focused activism in this regard.
40 Doorbar member organisations received training in Leadership Development
(training of trainers)
12 members attended different trainings and conferences abroad
35 members participated in country study tour in 2004 and 38 in 2005
48 workshops on VAW organized for the members of Doorbar member
organizations, and
9 workshops were held at central level.
188 workshop for CPVAW members (Naripokkho)
12 orientation and training events with member organisations and 6 exchange visits
(BSAF)
Network established with 23 NGOs in Rajshahi to promote public awareness about
child rights in general to especially support street children in establishing their rights.
(TDC)
1 poster (5.000 copies) and class routines (7.500 copies) for the primary and non-primary
students in 12 adivasi unions have been published to promote Indigenous Peoples right
to bilingual education.(Barcik)
12 village common forests have been managed according to a sustainable management
plan which benefited 948 families, by strengthened indigenous community organisations
(Taungya)
Cultural awareness has been raised among the Garo people raising through a cultural
festival Wanna (Wangala) in the Garo Hills area, Mymensingh (BAF-2)
940 meetings have been held, including 673 at community level, to promote the rights of
indigenous peoples and to strengthen the ability of indigenous community leaders to
undertake effective advocacy (IPDS)
Open Air Street Centre established for primary contact and referral point for 360 street
children in Rajshahi
Drop in Center (DIC) established to facilitate first aid, health, psychological and
educational support for 120 street children.
Assessment The present report is only including projects financed through the Programme
Grant, which according to Programme Document makes up 22% of the total
programme budget. However, the 4 programme level objectives are defined for the
whole programme without considering the 3 different funding modalities. Thus the
present assessment of the completion of objectives is held within the limits of the
Programme Grant.
PO-1
The achievements regarding legal aid have been very satisfactory and both the direct and
the indirect impacts of this support are considered significant. There have been some
important contributions to awareness raising as well as capacity building within public
institutions, related to rights of specific HR-vulnerable groups. However, overall this
support has been too dispersed to guarantee sustainable long term impact. There have
PO-2
A few local projects have contributed to the completion of this objective, on the one hand
by increasing people’s participation in public affairs and by monitoring public service
delivery as well as performance of elected representatives. On the other hand, by training
of members of elected bodies and local government personnel, good results have been
achieved at the local level, and the impact of the training of UP representatives in their
role and responsibilities in relation to Village Court and Arbitration Councils should be
highlighted. However, the interventions have all been limited to a few districts and not
exceeding local government level (Union Parishads), which hamper the possibilities of
achieving a broader impact. The conclusion must be that the contribution to the
completion of this objective has been less satisfactory. The fact that the planned support
to expected guardian institutions did not materialize, has obviously contributed to less
progress regarding this objective.
PO-3
Several projects have contributed with significant results to the increase of public
awareness about HRGG through NGOs as well as through the press, and probably
this awareness building represents the most comprehensive impact of the support
financed through the Programme Grant. Additionally, the free press has been defended
through interventions supporting and encouraging journalists who have been harassed
because of their commitment to freedom of expression. Finally some interventions aimed
at the improvement of professional skill of journalists. Although this support only
indirectly might have benefited the HRGG situation, at an overall level the achievements
to the fulfilling of this objective should be classified as very satisfactory.
PO-4
Among the efforts to comply with this objective the Alternative Dispute Resolutions
(ADR) based on traditional community institutions should be highlighted, since
significant impacts have been achieved in this regard. Due to the difficulties for poor
people to access justice through the formal judicial system, civil society organisations have
developed an alternative response using the traditional shalish councils at village level as
starting point. The ADR especially concerns family conflicts, and women have especially
benefited from this alternative.
A wide range of initiatives has been oriented towards organizational support and capacity
building to civil society organisation representing HR-vulnerable groups, especially
children, women and indigenous peoples, including the implementing NGOs themselves.
Although it is difficult to evaluate the impact of this support in short terms, the results of
these wide spread efforts represents one of the most important impacts provided by of
the Programme Grant. Due to inadequate public service delivery a few projects have
supported NGO based service delivery for street children. Although such initiative are
unsustainable, it should be considered that they are part of projects with a wider
perspective of improving legal framework and institutional conditions.
The PSU was entrusted with the responsibility to support the Embassy in
facilitating the mainstreaming HRGG concerns in the Danish funded Sector
Programmes, and specific inputs and strategy proposals were prepared. Besides
specific consultations/information dissemination events were undertaken by the
PSU.
5. PROGRAMME/PROJECT RESULTS
Not applicable
6. CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
Which changes in output (policies, services, etc.6) have been experienced by partner organisations? Discuss the
contribution by the programme/project to achieving the possible changes.
As stated elsewhere, the programme has contributed significantly to the consolidation and
5 All programmes prepared after 1 September 2003 are expected to have output-based budgets. For programmes prepared
before this date, it may not be possible to indicate the budget and expenditure for one key output per component.
6 See Danida: A Results-Oriented Approach to Capacity Change, April 2005. The paper mentions as an example that
capacity support to an accounts department (partner organisation) should lead to better and timely monthly accounts
statements (outputs).
7. OUTSTANDING ISSUES
Discuss major outstanding issues after the end of the programme (phase)/project, incl. relevant sustainability
issues.
The first phase of the programme has focused NGO support to human rights issues, and few
initiatives have been oriented towards governance issue, and none implemented by government
institutions. This certainly leaves governance issues as outstanding, which should be addressed
in the second phase of the programme.
Considering the risks, the Programme Document includes a critical and realistic view on the
HRGG situation in Bangladesh and the political, institutional and cultural circumstances which
make up the conditions for this situation. There is no optimism about future perspectives, as
vested interest is expected to continue to hamper possibilities of impact in relation to the
programme areas, and the political will is expected to continue to be poor or even turn worse
after 2001 elections. The Document concludes that support to HRGG is quite vulnerable,
“facing a range of obstacles and problems that could well weaken the effectiveness and success
of the intended outcomes. In summary, there is a fairly strong risk that the programme alone
will have little effect on national policies and practices.” However, together with other donor
inputs, the programme may have a cumulative effect that is positive.
The stated risk have maintained its relevance throughout the project period, and the lack of
political will has been the main reason for not establishing the foreseen guardian institutions,
and for not complying fully with the Chittagong Hill Tracts Peace Accord . Thus there has not
been any direct support to government institutions through the Programme Grant and
although some advocacy work has been carried out, it has had little effect on national policies.
The main achievements of the programme are definitely linked to the support to the
Among the assumptions and preconditions mentioned in the Programme Document only one
has not been fully met, since it was assumed that ” the legislation in the relevant areas with
respect to human rights and good governance will be passed and that it will be passed in a form
that facilitates the concerned projects”.
9. LESSONS LEARNED
Important lessons of general interest to Danida with particular emphasis on (i) alignment, (ii) harmonisation,
(iii) programme management (incl. monitoring).
The number of projects and partners (totally 52 NGO projects within little more than 3 years)
was excessive, so the major part of PSU’s time was used on identification and appraisal of new
project proposals, thus leaving insufficient time for monitoring and follow up during
implementation. The lack of a monitoring system at programme level has hampered the work
of quality assurance, and the ongoing dialogue with the partners.
On the other hand, the support to smaller and local NGOs has brought the Programme in
close contact with the target group and also permits piloting of more innovative interventions.
All through the programme the project implementation has been anchored with the partner
organisations, and flexibility has been applied in order to align with partners procedures and
formats in relation to reporting, procurement and audits. In three cases good experiences have
been obtained as to co funding with other donors through basket fund arrangements.
10. DOCUMENTATION
List all relevant documents7 prepared during the lifespan of the programme (details in annex).
(All documents to be found at PSU)
Title month-year
ENDORSEMENT8
*) The programme consisted of many small NGO projects, and there was no programme level steering committee
and the programme was managed by the PSU/the Embassy. Thus there is no relevant partner representative to
sign.
8 A paper version with signatures is filed in the Representation, while an electronic version (including names and dates of
signatories) is uploaded in PDB.