Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Matthew Bishop
Cooper
AP Language, Pd. 3
27 August 2017
Oyeniyi, Doyin. “Native Americans Continue the Fight to Stop the Trans-Pecos Pipeline
http://www.texasmonthly.com/energy/native-americans-continue-fight-stop-trans- pecos-
Speaker: The speaker of this article, Doyin Oyeniyi, is a young female author who writes about
local events for the Texas monthly. She has stated her position as a firm supporter of the protests
combating the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. Therefore, the views that she
expresses in the article can be presumably biased in favor of the Native Americans and the
protestors. Additionally, the heated tone that she expressed towards Donald Trump and his
executive orders indicates that she may also hold a liberal bias.
Occasion: This article was written about two months after Donald Trump took office, which was
directly after he wrote executive orders to continue the construction of both the Dakota Access
Pipeline and the Trans-Pecos Pipeline in West Texas. This indicates why the author primarily
focuses on the fight against the Trans-Pecos Pipeline. Additionally, the pipeline is being built in
a region that supports both Donald Trump and advancements in the fossil fuels industry, which
Audience: Throughout the article, Oyeniyi repeated statements such as; “we need more of our
communities to support [us]” and “we need more feet on the ground” (Paragraph 12). Based on
these statements, the reader can assume that she is directing the piece towards community
members of the Big Bend region where the Trans-Pecos Pipeline is being constructed.
Additionally, one can assume that this audience is inactive in combating local issues such as the
pipeline construction.
Purpose: The author wrote this article in order to persuade her audience to be more active in the
Subject: Oyeniyi begins the article by writing about the opposition to the Dakota Access
Pipeline, and she explains why the protesters were successful until Trump’s executive orders.
And as the article progressed, she shifted to writing about the current fight against the Trans-
Pecos Pipeline. She explains the importance in opposing it’s construction and emphasizes the
Tone: Overall, her attitude towards the subject was of strong opposition to the construction of the
pipeline. This can presumably be out of her deep respect for any community members, Native
American people, and environments that would potentially suffer. Additionally, her heated tone
of opposition helps her get her point across to the reader and strengthens her call to action.
Perez, Tom. “Trump is breaking the federal government's promises to Native Americans.” Los
Speaker: Tom Perez, the speaker of this article, is the chairmen of the Democratic National
Committee. Based on his political alignment, he is most assuredly biased in opposition to the
acts of our current president, Donald Trump. This explains his opposition to Trump’s proposed
Occasion: The article was written when Trump was continuing his attempts to get his southern
border wall approved by Congress. Therefore, the article was most likely written in response to
the debate over Trump’s proposed wall, and the issues with Native American lands located on
Audience: This article is directed towards the citizens of the United States and the supporters of
Trump’s proposed border wall. As US citizens, this is an issue of all of our concern as his wall
would severely violate Native American rights, and intrude upon their sacred and dignified
lands.
Purpose: The author wrote this piece in order to inform readers about this issue, and to persuade
them to step up against Trump’s movements that threaten the health and prosperity of the Native
Americans.
Subject: Perez writes about the atrocities of the Eisenhower-era policy of Termination that
dismantled the sovereignty of Native American governments, and he compares them to the
current policies being set up by President Trump. He focuses on presenting the reader with facts
and statistics related to how these policies will negatively affect the Native American societies.
Finally, he finishes his argument by stating the necessity of President Trump to join the
Tone: The author presented the article in a spiteful and snide tone. This indicates that he is
heavily against the current shift in the treatment of Native Americans under the Presidency of
Donald Trump.
Bateman, Christopher. “A Step Back for Women’s Rights.” Vanity Fair, April 2008,
Speaker: The speaker for this article is a male writing about the history of wage discrimination
based on gender. This is significant because it shows that he is unbiased on this issue despite
being a male who doesn’t suffer from the wage gap. Additionally, he is a former student of
Occasion: The article was written in April of 2008, which was right before Obama was elected
president. This is an important time period for this subject, because it occurred when President
Bush opposed bills that proposed equal pay. It was also before Obama fought to strengthen the
rights of victims of pay discrimination, which overall strengthens the need of this influential
article.
Audience: This piece was directed to all US citizens, as the author often directly addresses the
United States public as a whole. Additionally, this is an issue that should be concerning for all,
for it negatively affects a large portion of our population. Therefore, it is something that needs
Purpose: The author wrote this text in order to send a message to the American people that the
wage gap is a seriously concerning and harmful issue that needs to be amended.
Subject: Bateman writes about women’s rights issues in the past, and he relates them to the still
prevalent modern issue of unequal pay. He does this by telling a personal story of Lilly
Ledbetter, an advocate for women’s rights, and her failed struggles for an equal paycheck
Tone: The author’s attitude towards this subject is passionate and enthusiastic. In the end, this
tone increases the effect of his pro women’s rights message by further engaging the reader
Skutsch, Carl. “The History of White Supremacy in America.” Rolling Stone, 19 August 2017,
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-history-of-white- supremacy-in-
Speaker: Carl Skutsch, the speaker of this article, is a middle-aged male history teacher from
New York. Based on his profession, one can assume that the information presented will be an
accurate and factual recollection of our dark history with white supremacy. However, despite his
position as a historian, his other posts about the impeachment of Donald Trump suggest his
Occasion: This article was written on August 19th, 2017, just days after the alt-right rallies in
Charlottesville. As a result, this article was written in direct response to that recent resurgence of
racism, hatred, and supremacy, all of which have deep, dark roots in American history.
Bishop |6
Audience: This piece is directed towards the US citizens who are uneducated about alt-right and
racist hate groups in the past. This can include people of all race, religion, and age.
Purpose: Carl Skutsch wrote this article in order to inform his audience about the various hate
groups that have come and gone throughout history. He does this by illustrating the horrendous
behaviors of groups such as the KKK, which will hopefully make an impact on his readers for
the better.
Subject: The author began the article by talking about the issues with white supremacy today and
events such as the violence in Charlottesville. Later in the writing, he gives an extensive
recollection of the history of white supremacy in the United States, which goes all the way back
Tone: Throughout the article, the author portrays quotes from white supremacists in a negative
light, and he presents haunting and gruesome fact about American hate groups. Overall, the
writer has a passionate distaste for the backwards horrors of white supremacy. And In turn, this
bleak tone leaves the reader with an accurately dark image of the alt-right.
turn/wp/2017/03/09/opposition-to-immigration-is-at-odds-with-economic-
Speaker: Jennifer Rubin is an author for the Right Turn blog, and she reports opinions from a
conservative perspective. However, unlike many other conservatives, she is pro-immigration and
Occasion: This post was written in the summer of this year, which has been a rough time for
policies revolving around immigration. Because of the time that this was written, the article
focuses heavily on the current attempts to bar and deport immigrants away from the United
States.
Audience: This article was directed towards US citizens who are opposed to immigration to the
United States, both legal and illegal. While this remains a diverse audience, it mainly consists of
other conservatives.
Purpose: Rubin wrote this article in order to inform readers about the importance that immigrants
have in the overall success of our economy. This remains especially true in a time where the
Subject: The author conveys her point through the use of facts and statistics about the positive
influence immigrants have on the economy. She also goes on to include statistics that counter the
arguments of anti-immigrant conservatives. Overall, this provides the article with a strong logos
appeal.
Tone: Rubin shows that many immigrants do in fact have a sufficient level of education, most of
them maintain a low crime rate, and most of them live here legally. In the end, the author
presented these positive statistics with a pleasant and encouraging attitude towards the subject of
Bishop |8
immigration. As a result, the article was a more successful piece of persuasive writing, and it will
Tavernise, Sabrina. “Sanctuary Bills in Maryland Faced a Surprise Foe: Legal Immigrants.” The
Speaker: Sabrina Tavernise is an American born journalist for the New York Times who has
reported in Iraq, Lebanon, and Russia. As an American born citizen, she could be biasedly
opposed to immigrants who are not citizens and reside in the United States illegally.
Occasion: She wrote this article in May of 2017, which was during an incredibly polar time in
the heated debate over immigration policies. More specifically, this piece focused primarily on
the debate over the passing of sanctuary bills. These pro-immigration bills were passed around
May of this year, and they gave refuge to illegal immigrants coming into the United States.
Audience: The author directs this article to those who support illegal immigration to the United
States. These supporters of sanctuary cities for undocumented immigrants are mostly democratic
liberals. However, as this article surprisingly outlines, most legal immigrants are not of these
supporters.
Purpose: The author wrote this article in order to convince the audience that undocumented
immigrants are not dignified to bypass the legal immigration system, and sanctuary cities are
Subject: Sabrina Tavernise interviewed four legal immigrants from varied backgrounds, and she
told of their hard-working path to citizenship. Throughout the article, she compared and
contrasted these hard-fought success stories of reputable citizens with the undesirable statistics
Tone: In the end, the author had a bitter attitude towards the overall subject of illegal
immigration. This tone helps the reader to understand the importance of the issue, and to