Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Tempo
This content downloaded from 193.52.64.244 on Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:44:46 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Mike Searby
The stylistic changes in Gy6rgy Ligeti's music eminent influence on Ligeti in his formative years:
since 1960 have in some ways mirrored those in
Bartok remained my idol until 1950, and he continued
the wider contemporary music world. In his to be very important [to] me even after I left the
music of the 1960s he displays an experimental country in 1956.4
and systematic approach to the exploration of
sound matter which can also be seen in the Ligeti himself considers that Bartok's influence
has returned in his music:
contemporaneous music of composers such as
Xenakis, Penderecki and Stockhausen. In the Ever since the 1980s I have experienced a kind of
1970s his music shows a more eclectic approach,
return to Bartok, especially as far as the Piano
Concerto is concerned.5
particularly the opera Le Grand Macabre (1974-7)
in which there is much plundering of past styles -
The resulting music, however, is very different to
such as allusions to Monteverdi, Rossini, and
his Bartok-tinged music of the 1950s because it
Verdi. From this work onward there would
shows a synthesis of materials from the 1960s
appear to be a complete break from the approach
with tonal/modal elements and new ideas. These
in his works on the 1960s.
new ideas include Sub-Saharan and Caribbean
This softening of the avant garde, modernist
stance can also be identified in the music of polyrhythms, fractal geometry (although admit-
tedly it is difficult to identify this feature clearly),
Ligeti's contemporaries, such as Berio, Xenakis,
and the player-piano music of the American
Maxwell Davies, and Penderecki.1 Ligeti's music
composer Conlon Nancarrow. Ligeti's recent
of the 1980s and 1990s has continued evolving
music does show elements of past styles and his
towards greater approachability and an almost
attitude to the avant garde seems to have changed:
tonal or modal (or at least, in his words, 'non-
My rejection of avant garde music also lays me open
atonal')2 language. The general trend of con-
to attacks and accusations of being a postmodern
temporary music in the last 15 years seems to
composer. I don't give a damn.6
consist of a gradual shift away from a 'modernist'
and atonal approach, towards an unashamedly
Ligeti's latest music refers to music and approaches
'postmodernist' and tonal one. of the past in some ways, but to label it as
Stephen Taylor, in his study of Ligeti's later
postmodernist is misleading. To develop a full
music, asks some pertinent questions: understanding of why Ligeti (like some of his
... has the new music in fact simply returned contemporaries)
to has shifted towards a more
conservative approach, it is necessary to consider
Ligeti's old style, before he left Hungary? Has Ligeti,
briefly the compositional techniques he used in
in spite of all his protestations to the contrary, gone
'retro'?3 the 1960s.
Ligeti's music from the early 1960s shows a
There are some superficial resemblances between
complete destruction of traditional composi-
Ligeti's 'Hungarian' works, such as the String
tional means. For example in a work like
Quartet No.1 (1953-4), and his recent music: not
Atmospheres for orchestra (1961), melody, harmony
least the rediscovery of Bartokian stylistic
and rhythm are all practically excluded in favour
features, particularly in the rhythms of Ligeti's
of texture and timbre. The harmony largely
recent compositions. Bartok's music had a pre-
consists of saturated semitone clusters; there is no
1 Penderecki has gone much further towards a tonal language clearly recognizable melody. This music does
composing in a kind of sub-Brucknerian style from the 1970s show a type of polyphony described by Ligeti as
onwards.
Mikropolyphonie, but this'results in a complex
2 Szitha, T. 'A Conversation with Gyorgy Ligeti', Hungarian
4 'A Conversation with Gy6rgy Ligeti', p.14.
Music Quarterly, Vol 3, ptl, 1992, p.15.
s Ibid., p.14.
3 Taylor, S., The Lamento Motif: Metamorphosis in Ligeti's Late
Style, DMA, Cornell University, 1994, p.18. 6 Ibid., p.15.
This content downloaded from 193.52.64.244 on Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:44:46 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
10 Ligeti: the Postmodernist?
interweaving texture, rather than audible counter- individual parts move at a quicker pace than the
point.7 What can be observed in Atmospheres is surrounding texture, bringing them forward in
a 'razing to the ground' of past traditions and the perspective of the musical landscape. Even in
building a compositional edifice with completely the enormous web-like structures of Lontano
new foundations. there are always instruments and motifs which
Throughout the 1960s it is possible to identify are more apparent to the ear; this is almost a
in Ligeti's music a refining of the techniques chance-like function of Ligeti's orchestration. If
found in Atmospheres and Apparitions for orchestra all the instruments (or voices) are markedpp, it is
(1958-9). Mikropolyphonie becomes a much more inevitable that the balance will not be completely
varied and subtle device, controlling the whole equal (indeed this unevenness of balance is almost
process and evolution of a work in a similar way essential to the music, otherwise the texture
to the compositional processes found, for could become extremely bland and featureless).
example, in the music of Steve Reich. Lontano for Each performance/recording of Lontano (or other
orchestra (1967) and LuxAeterna for voices (1966) similar works) is therefore quite distinct, because
are particularly significant examples of this the 'foreground' parts will never be the same; it is
refined process.8 There is less use of the broad not simply a matter of interpretation but is a
'brush-stroke' of texture and timbre, and more result of the musical language.9
reliance on arhythmic canons. The aural result The shift towards melodic writing becomes
consists of a slowly shifting cluster, starting from even more clear in Ligeti's Chamber Concerto
a unison note and gradually expanding, rather in (1969-70) and in Melodien for orchestra (1971). In
the way a fertilized egg develops, by splitting the former work, the second movement shows
each cell into two, and then each new cell splits the solo instruments (horn, trombone, and oboe
again, ad infinitum. See Ex. 1, from Lux Aeterna, d'amore) taking parts of the surrounding back-
showing the background dusters: ground texture and placing them in the foreground
Ex.1 bars 1- 12
bar 1 4 5 7 8
9 11 12
This content downloaded from 193.52.64.244 on Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:44:46 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Ligeti the Postmodernist? 11
clt.
(background) x
PP
tbn. |8
b.25-6
pppp p dolce
hn. 6 7 3 --'.
b.26-7 I - I~ r' ,;- 7'F7LqJ. I h~ .I
_l l I I Df e do no bw- I , ,
v
vt7 . V- dolc
PPTP = p dolce
dissonance.
apparently 'forbidden fruit' of melody This can create an unnece
over the
next 25 years. restricted harmonic palette in which
possible harmonies
In his works of the early 1960s, however, there are taboo. What can
is a sense in which Ligeti destroyedin Ligeti's
the later works, such as the Ho
traditional
(1983),
elements of music such as harmony, Piano
melody, and Concerto (1988) and
rhythm, to allow himself to focus on the
Concerto (1992), is an incredibly rich an
range
parameters of texture and timbre.11 of
It is harmony. As Taylor observes:
hardly
surprising that once his experiments in the use of
The harmonies [in Ligeti's later music] hav
those parameters had been fully explored, he
four types:
needed to move on to new concerns. As
1. Triads, Ligeti
major or minor in first inversion;
states: 2. 'open-fifth fields', though not always arranged
vertically in fifths;
... creating something that already exists is not
3. {0, 1, 6}, which combines tritones, major
interesting for me. If something new has been tried out
sevenths, and fifths - also elaborations of this set
and a result has emerged from it, it is not worth making
such as {0, 1, 2, 7} or {0, 1, 3, 6, 7J or a major triad
the same experiment again.12
with an added #fourth;
This meant rediscovering elements
4. Seventhhechordshad- usually major, minor,
diminished
previously avoided: harmony; melody; or half diminished in root position or
rhythm;
inversion.15
and finally thirds, sixths, triads and tonal/modal
implications. This 'rediscovery' Such
is not a simple
a breadth of harmony creates for Ligeti a
return to a traditional view of these elements, but
much more expressive harmonic language which
an examination of them in the light of his
is extended earlier
further by his use of microtonality
discoveries.
or unusual tunings. These can be found in the
It is thus misleading to suggest
Hornthat
Trio, Ligeti's
the Violin Concerto (especially when
latest works are postmodernist or the
'retro':
ocarinas he is not
are used), Ramifications for Strings
trying to 'rediscover the past', rather he is trying
(1968-9), and Passacaglia ungherese for Harpsi-
to discover new ways of treating universal
chord (1978).
elements of music. He puts it likeThe
this:
latter work uses mean-tone temperament,
which allows the
Now I have the courage to be 'old-fashioned'. I basic
don't eight intervals of the work
want to return to the 19th century, but(majorI'm noand
thirds longer
minor sixths) to be heard in just
interested in such categories as avant garde,
intonation.modernism
It is one of the first works to explore
Ligeti's new
or atonality13 . . . I hate neo-Expressionism andambiguous
I can't tonal style; the opera Le
stand the neo-Mahlerite and neo-Bergian affectations,
Grand Macabre (1974-7) also explores tonality, but
just as I can't stand post-modern architecture.14
there it is driven by quotation and pastiche, rather
than the forging of of
The main generalized characteristics a new musical language. The
modernist harmony are, usually,Passacagliaan avoidanceis based onofa succession of eight
intervals, inverted
tonal implication and a fairly consistently at bar 5, which form the
high
framework for the passacaglia. These intervals
are allnot
11 This kind of musical experimentation would major thirds
have and minor sixths (inversions
been
allowed in Hungary in the 1950s. of each other) and contain all 12 notes of the
12 Ligeti in Conversation, p.94. chromatic scale. Four pitches related by the
13 'A Conversation with Gyorgy Ligeti', interval
p.14. of the perfect fourth (E, A, D, and G)
This content downloaded from 193.52.64.244 on Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:44:46 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
12 Ligeti the Postmodernist?
appear twice and seem to create a shifting tonal ambiguous approach to quasi-tonal harmony
centre. The progressions of the intervallic allows Ligeti to 'play' with the listener's
framework seem to imply C, D, G, and F, as expectations. The listener never feels completely
fleeting tonal centres.16 Another feature is the on firm tonal land because the harmonic
lower voice, which outlines two chromatic background of the music is continually twisting
clusters in a rather Webernesque manner. and turning.
Passacaglia Ungherese is Baroque in its textural In Ligeti's next work, the Horn Trio, it is
sound world but becomes increasingly demented possible to see continuations of some of the ideas
and distorted as the relatively simple and contained in the Passacaglia. Ligeti consistently
straightforward opening music disintegrates. It uses thirds, sixths and triads throughout the
begins with a simple melodic line, added to the Horn Trio (see Ex.3) combined with other more
passacaglia at bar 5, which sometimes fits, anddissonant and atonal harmonies. The work never
sometimes contradicts, the underlying harmonicshows a clear sense of tonality other than in the
implication. Generally the piece becomes denser most fleeting sense, and clear triadic formations
and more contrapuntal before appearing toare subverted by the other parts; see Ex.4.
'break down' on the final page; rather like one of In the second movement the ostinato in the left
Ligeti's movements based on machines and clockshand of the piano seems to imply a combination
which eventually self-destruct (for example, theof the keys of C and G flat - a rather Bartokian
third movement of his Chamber Concerto). The device - but the melodic right hand is freely
final chord in Passacaglia consists of a clear chromatic,
E albeit within local modal regions; see
major triad, but this does not sound as a tonic, andEx.5.
the tonality remains enigmatic throughout. This The other link between the Passacaglia and the
vln.
p
4if a j j ^ :bI: v -Ff1- I# 7 i?
_ ,, I r I -j i--J_ I
vln.
Li-Y
ibm1-
I - f
_ rI I- M
l;?,. I i1- rr- I
*F- - r >-4 r >
pft.~ mf L ' v
I I L L,> i .- h , L> -
r 7~~~~~I
I
I I IL I 1 I l
iPP-
This content downloaded from 193.52.64.244 on Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:44:46 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Ligeti the Postmodernist? 13
'Lamento motif 17 (see Ex.6). Steven Taylor For a great many years I h
suggests this is a fundamental melodic 'signal' in asymmetrical rhythms, whic
Ligeti's later works such as the second movement rhythms... These asymmetric
of the Piano Concerto and the sixth Piano Study have been very much in line
(1985).18 According to Jeffery Bossin this motif rhythmic solutions. . . [Hung
is based on the funeral laments of the women of the influence of Latin Amer
Siebenbiirgen.19 derived from the commercial
inF F Y 1> I } 10
f
This content downloaded from 193.52.64.244 on Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:44:46 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
14 Ligeti the Postmodernist?
Vivace cantabile
A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vln. 1
i--poco
6. 6^ 6j.: , ^~j. ^ . 6 J. ^ J. ;j - -0. 6j - ^j_6 -~
cresc. _-- _ p
LJ b: b:- r- 6 P6 I r ir
vla.
ppp pp p
more clearly heard when they pulled apart, the next stepby
are performed would seem to be
separate instrumentalists/singers such
gradually as inthe
to reintegrate the
elements into the
Nonsense Madrigals (1988).23 In newgeneral it can
musical landscape. WherebeLigeti differs
seen that rhythm has become more of a from the postmodernists is that his 'rediscovery'
foreground component of Ligeti's language, andof past materials illuminates them in a new and
has a clear connexion with Bartok's use of original way, whereas much of what is classified
rhythm. as postmodernist music seems to be attempting to
Ligeti's approach to structure has evolved breathe life into long-dead musical corpses.
towards the use of shapes which are more Ligeti's music is postmodern in the sense that it
preformed and perhaps traditional in nature. goes beyond modernism; but it does not show the
Examples include the use of passacaglia structures sentimentality or backward-looking quality of
in the finale of the Horn Trio, the Passacaglia much of what is classified as postmodernist
Ungherese, and the fourth movement of the Violin music. He has observed:
Concerto; and also the use of a simple ternary
We live in an age of artistic pluralism. While
structure in the first three movements of the
modernism and even the experimental avant-garde
Horn Trio. This approach is very different to that are still present, 'post-modern' artistic movements are
in works like Lontano, where the structural model becoming more prevalent. 'Pre-modern', however,
has an almost improvisational character with very would be a better word to describe these movements,
little repetition of earlier material. The structures for the artists who belong to them are interested in the
of his music up to Le Grand Macabre have a high restoration of historical elements and forms.24
This content downloaded from 193.52.64.244 on Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:44:46 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms